packet

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JULY 11, 2016 - 7:30 P.M. REVISED BY DELETING CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION - CAROLINE HERMANCE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 15 LOOCKERMAN PLAZA DOVER, DELAWARE OPEN FORUM - 15 MINUTES PRIOR TO OFFICIAL MEETING (7:15 P.M.) THE “OPEN FORUM” SEGMENT IS PROVIDED TO EXTEND THE OPPORTUNITY TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO SHARE THEIR QUESTIONS, THOUGHTS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS, AND COMPLAINTS. DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM APPEARING ON THE AGENDA AS A PUBLIC HEARING IS PROHIBITED DURING THE OPEN FORUM AS AN OPPORTUNITY WILL BE PROVIDED DURING CONSIDERATION OF THAT ITEM. CITIZEN COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. COUNCIL IS PROHIBITED FROM TAKING ACTION SINCE THEY ARE NOT IN OFFICIAL SESSION; HOWEVER, THEY MAY SCHEDULE SUCH ITEMS AS REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND ACT UPON THEM IN THE FUTURE. INVOCATION BY BISHOP THOMAS L. HOLSEY PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN SUDLER AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS * CONSENT AGENDA THOSE ITEMS ON THE COUNCIL AGENDA WHICH ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND NON- CONTROVERSIAL SHALL BE MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK (*) AND WILL BE ACTED UPON BY A SINGLE ROLL CALL VOTE OF THE COUNCIL. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS A MEMBER OF COUNCIL SO REQUESTS, IN WHICH EVENT THE MATTER SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED A SEPARATE ITEM. * 1. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 2. PRESENTATIONS - RECOGNITION OF SERVICE A. DAVID EDGELL - PUBLIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) - JANUARY 2000 THROUGH JULY 2002 AND SILVER LAKE COMMISSION - MAY 2000 THROUGH MAY 2016 B. CINDY SMALL - DOWNTOWN DOVER PARTNERSHIP - JUNE 2008 THROUGH MARCH 2016 C. DOROTHY SNYDER - DOVER PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY COMMISSION - JUNE 2001 THROUGH JUNE 2016 D. COLONEL ROBERT D. WELSH, RETIRED - PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 1998 THROUGH JUNE 2016 3. PRESENTATION - MAURICE SENDAK: 50 YEARS, 50 WORKS, 50 REASONS MEMORIAL EXHIBITION

Council Agenda - July 11, 2016 Page 2 * 4. DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION REPORT - MAY 25, 2016 A. ELECTION OF CHAIR - COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE (COMMISSION DEFERRED THE ELECTION OF THE CHAIR FOR THE COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING, DUE TO VACANCIES ON THE COMMISSION) B. DHRC COMMITTEE UPDATES (1) GOVERNMENT POLICY, PROGRAMS, AND PRACTICES COMMITTEE (MCGIFFIN) (2) COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE (ROACH) (3) EDUCATION COMMITTEE (BOGLE) (COMMISSION DEFERRED THE EDUCATION COMMITTEE UPDATE UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING, DUE TO THE ABSENCE OF COMMISSIONER BOGLE) (4) COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE (DUE TO THE LACK OF COMMISSIONERS AVAILABLE TO ATTEND, THE COMMISSION VOTED TO FOREGO PARTICIPATION IN THIS YEAR'S AFRICAN AMERICAN FESTIVAL) C. OLD BUSINESS - DHRC VACANCIES (FIRST AND FOURTH DISTRICTS) * 5. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT - JUNE 28, 2016 A. SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (1) PRESENTATIONS (A) SPEED CONTROL MEASURES - NORTH STATE STREET (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED MOVING FORWARD WITH THE PROPOSED MEDIAN AND THAT THE 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT BE EXTENDED TO THE INTERSECTION ON WALKER ROAD) (B) PROPOSED SERVICE ROAD BEHIND THE MALL (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO PROVIDE A LETTER AT THE JULY 6, 2016 MEETING OF THE DOVER/KENT COUNTY MPO REQUESTING THAT THE PROPOSED DOVER MALL SERVICE ROAD BE ELEVATED ON THE MPO'S TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIZATION LIST) (2) REVIEW OF BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS - SENATOR BIKEWAY DESIGN CONCEPT (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ACCEPTANCE OF THE BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND MOVING FORWARD WITH THE SENATOR BIKEWAY DESIGN CONCEPT ) (3) QUARTERLY UPDATE - BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN SUBCOMMITTEE (COMMITTEE ACTION NOT REQUIRED) (4) RE-EVALUATION OF THE NEED FOR THE BLUE LIGHT PHONES IN CITY PARKS (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED REFERRING THIS MATTER TO THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE WITH A COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF DATA REGARDING BLUE PHONE USAGE VERSUS THE NUMBER OF EMERGENCY CELL PHONE CALLS RECEIVED OVER THE LAST FIVE (5) YEARS) (5) UPDATES (COMMITTEE ACTION NOT REQUIRED ON THE BELOW ITEMS) (A) HAMLET SHOPPING PLAZA (B) THE ELKS LODGE - 217 NORTH KIRKWOOD STREET (6) VIABILITY OF THE SHOTSPOTTER GUNSHOT DETECTION AND LOCATION SERVICE (DEFERRED DUE TO TIME CONSTRAINTS)

Council Agenda - July 11, 2016 Page 3 * 5. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT - JUNE 28, 2016 (CONTINUED) B. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE (1) FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 EDWARD BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM - JOINT GRANT WITH SMYRNA POLICE DEPARTMENT AND KENT COUNTY (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE GRANT PROJECT, AS REQUESTED) (2) DISCUSSION - FISCAL YEAR 2016 AUDIT PROGRAM (COMMITTEE ACTION NOT REQUIRED) (3) ACTUARY SERVICES CONTRACT - PENSION AND OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED AWARDING A FIVE (5) YEAR CONTRACT, TO BEGIN IN FY17 AND END IN FY21, TO NYHART FOR VALUATION SERVICES TOTALING $96,700 AND HOURLY RATES FOR BENEFITS CONSULTING AS QUOTED IN THEIR RESPONSE TO THE CITY OF DOVER RFP #16-0041FN - PENSION AND OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS ACTUARIAL SERVICES AND BENEFITS CONSULTING) * 6. MONTHLY REPORTS - MAY 2016 A. CITY ASSESSOR’S REPORT B. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT C. CITY PLANNER’S REPORT D. CONTROLLER/TREASURER’S BUDGET REPORT E. FIRE CHIEF’S REPORT F. POLICE CHIEF’S REPORT * 7. DISCHARGING THE PRESIDENT'S COUNSEL ON PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS AND THE FUTURE OF CITY HALL, WEYANDT HALL, FORMER DOVER LIBRARY, AND OTHER CITY PROPERTIES 8. REAPPOINTMENTS RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR CHRISTIANSEN (DEFERRED DURING THE COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016) A. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - THREE (3) YEAR TERMS TO EXPIRE JULY 2019 (1) K.C. SHETH, CHAIRMAN (2) WILLIAM A. HUFNAL B. PLANNING COMMISSION - KATHLEEN WELSH - FIRST DISTRICT - THREE (3) YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 1, 2019 (DEFERRED DURING THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 23, 2016) 9. CITY MANAGER’S ANNOUNCEMENTS 10. COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ANNOUNCEMENTS 11. ADJOURNMENT EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO: 29 DEL. C. §10004(B)(2) - PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIONS ON SITE ACQUISITIONS FOR ANY PUBLICLY FUNDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, OR SALES OR LEASES OF REAL PROPERTY; 29 DEL. C. §10004(B)(4) - STRATEGY SESSIONS, INCLUDING THOSE INVOLVING LEGAL ADVICE OR OPINION FROM AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW, WITH RESPECT TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING OR PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION, BUT ONLY WHEN AN OPEN MEETING WOULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE BARGAINING OR LITIGATION POSITION OF THE PUBLIC BODY;

Council Agenda - July 11, 2016 Page 4 EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO: (CONTINUED) 29 DEL. C. §10004(B)(6) - DISCUSSION OF THE CONTENT OF DOCUMENTS, EXCLUDED FROM THE DEFINITION OF "PUBLIC RECORD" IN §10002 OF THIS TITLE WHERE SUCH DISCUSSION MAY DISCLOSE THE CONTENTS OF SUCH DOCUMENTS; 29 DEL. C. §10004(B)(9) - PERSONNEL MATTERS IN WHICH THE NAMES, COMPETENCY AND ABILITIES OF INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES ARE DISCUSSED, UNLESS THE EMPLOYEE REQUESTS THAT SUCH A MEETING BE OPEN /TM S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\COUNCIL-AGENDAS\2016\07-11-2016 REVISED.WPD THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. PURSUANT TO 29 DEL. C. §10004(E)(2), THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, WHICH ARISE AT THE TIME OF THE MEETING.

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING The Regular Council Meeting was held on June 27, 2016 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Slavin presiding. Council members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Sudler, Mr. Neil, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Cole (departed at 7:54 p.m., and returned at 7:58 p.m.), Mr. Hosfelt, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Council staff members present were Police Chief Bernat, Mrs. Mitchell, Mr. Koenig, Fire Chief Carey, City Solicitor Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Mrs. Townshend was absent. Mayor Christiansen was also present (departed at 7:54 p.m.). OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Slavin declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council was not in official session and could not take formal action. Mr. William Neaton, Director of Economic Development for the City of Dover, stated that City Council took action a month or so ago that affected his office and he wanted to respond to a few of the comments that were made. With regard to comments that they should have advertised the Garrison Oak Technology Park in USA Today, Mr. Neaton advised that he would have loved to have advertised in all types of national publications; however, his marketing budget was zero. Regarding comments that he should have been attending regional and national conferences, Mr. Neaton advised that his travel budget was $100. He noted that, over the last four (4) years, he put almost 80,000 miles on his personal car attending meetings and seminars, much of which were for the City. Mr. Neaton stated that he was truly grateful for the privilege to have worked for the City of Dover for the past eight (8) years, noting that it has been one of the highlights of his professional career. He stated that he felt that they had accomplished a number of good things, such as creating relationships throughout the State that were not created in the past and developing a good working relationship with other economic development agencies. Mr. Neaton stated that they also had some good successes, such as Uzin Utz, Advantech, Produce Junction, and the Garrison Energy Center, all of which they worked directly with. Mr. Neaton advised that Mr. Ed Perez and Mrs. Beverly Jackson of his office are truly hard working, dedicated, and professional people. He noted that they had worked the past month with a black cloud over their heads and they have never wavered in their diligence to do a good job. Mr. Neaton stated that he hopes City Council will take care of them. Ms. Kristen Pleasanton, current Chair and eight (8) year member of the Design Committee for the Downtown Dover Partnership, stated that she had witnessed the hard work of Mr. Neaton, Mr. Perez, and Mrs. Jackson, and the successes resulting from their hard work. She stated that she has always had their support for all of their activities, in particular Mrs. Jackson, who has been her contact in the office, and Mr. Perez, both of whom are extremely conscientious, dedicated, and kind. Ms. Pleasanton stated that she wanted to express her support of Mrs. Jackson and Mr. Perez and to thank them for all of their hard work.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 2 Mayor Christiansen requested members to join him in a moment of silence in memory of Ryan Bradford; Eliza James, wife of former City Manager William T. James; and the victims of the Orlando, FL shootings. The invocation was given by Mayor Christiansen, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Neil moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and unanimously carried. Mr. Lewis requested that items #4-C-4 - Whatcoat Village Revitalization Payment-in-Lieu of Taxes (PILOT), #4-C-6 - Recommendation of General Employee Pension Board - Consideration of a Retiree Cost of Living Allowance (COLA), and #7 - Appointments (Reappointments) Recommended by Mayor Christiansen, be removed from the Consent Agenda. Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Consent Agenda, as amended. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hosfelt and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of June 13, 2016 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Neil, seconded by Mr. Hosfelt and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen. PROGRAM PRESENTATION - FIRST STATE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY During the Council Committee of the Whole/Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee meeting of June 14, 2016, Charles Kistler, Program Manager, First State Community Action Agency (FSCAA), reviewed a presentation regarding the organization’s Healthy Home, Energy Efficiency, Lead Safe, and People Centric (H.E.L.P.) Program. Council President Slavin stated that this matter could be placed on the agenda for a Regular City Council meeting, which would be televised and might be an opportunity to get the word out regarding the H.E.L.P. Program in another venue. During the Council meeting, Mr. Kistler reviewed a presentation entitled “City of Dover Council Briefing - June 27, 2016.” He explained that FSCAA is a Statewide community action agency that has a special relationship with communities in the State, especially those that are hard pressed. He stated that they offer more than 20 programs, including family services, housing and financial literacy, community services, community-based after school programs, employment training, and senior services. Mr. Kistler reviewed some of the components of the H.E.L.P. Program. He advised that the program’s Healthy Home aspect has to do with 29 hazards defined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), including pest infestation, indoor air quality, floors that are not structurally sound and cause trips and falls, etc. Mr. Kistler noted that the Energy Efficiency component has to do with helping people understand how to save energy and to apply these savings to a better quality of life. He stated the importance of the Lead Safe aspect of the program, noting that it was unknown how many children currently living in poverty are being poisoned by lead-based

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 3 paint. Mr. Kistler indicated that FSCAA currently has a grant to contain or abate lead. He stated that the People Centric aspect is a key piece of FSCAA programs because self-sufficiency is FSCAA’s main objective. This requires that they understand their clients and work toward putting sustainable behaviors in place that will lead clients to take full advantage of the work FSCAA does with the other components of the program. Referring to page 2 of the presentation, Mr. Kistler advised members that the Summer Cooling Assistance Program (SCAP) and Replace Repair Heaters & Conserve Energy (RRHACE) Program are components of the H.E.L.P. Program that are funded by the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) through the State of Delaware Division of Health and Social Services (DHHS). He explained that FSCAA was fortunate to win a 2016 base contract with an option for four (4) additional years for this program. Mr. Kistler noted that the benchmarks for this project in regard to air conditioning include installation of 650 window-mounted, wall-mounted, or portable- mounted air conditioners State-wide. He indicated that FSCAA was disappointed because they had not been able to get the word out or make proper outreach to obtain the number of interested people that they expected. Mr. Kistler stated that they had hoped for hundreds of participants to line up but had experienced numbers only in the single or double digits and was hopeful that they would benefit from the visibility provided by this Council meeting. Mr. Kistler advised that FSCAA also offers EcoKits that include LED lights that substantially reduce kilowatt consumption, low-flow shower heads, aerators, night lights, door sweeps, and window sealing. He stated that EcoKits add the benefit of offsetting what the air conditioners consume in electricity and also include an educational piece. Mr. Kistler noted that summers would become hotter each year and expressed concern about elderly people, young children, and those with breathing disorders, noting that FSCAA witnesses horrific situations on a daily basis. He advised that people in need are not aware of the program and do not know to ask. Mr. Kistler stated that extreme heat of the summer and extreme cold in the winter are crisis-oriented events, noting that FSCAA offers Statewide programs to address them and makes a concerted effort to identify those in real crisis and move them to a top priority level. He noted that FSCAA planned to provide 250 heating unit repairs and 200 replacements. They also planned 81 Healthy Home interventions based on 29 hazards, such as indoor air quality, pest infestation, and mold, noting that homes could not be healthy without fixing heating problems first. Mr. Kistler expressed the need to work in partnership with housing authorities and code enforcement individuals to identify homes without heat. He informed members that they have $1.6M for this purpose and that there are funds that must be spent before the end of September. Mr. Kistler stated that they were blessed to receive another contract to help people since they had hit their benchmarks. He noted that they also offer training. Mr. Kistler explained that there is only energy educator in the State of Delaware for this type of work and FSCAA wants to educate more people in the communities and train them to be energy educators. He noted that the FSCAA not only put in measures and repair heaters, but also act as an advocate for clients. Mr. Kistler informed members that FSCAA understands that breathing difficulties may bring a client to the emergency room and that some clients may have asthma or have to put cotton in their children’s ears to prevent bugs from entering. He stated that as long as they can understand the problems, they can come up with an attack strategy to remediate them. Mr. Kistler indicated that data tracking and evaluation of the RRHACE program is a means for FSCAA’s

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 4 survival, because without hard outcome analytical data to prove that the money spent is benefitting the clients being served, they will not be funded going forward. Mr. Kistler, referring to page 3 of the presentation, expressed the desire to focus in particular on the Department of Public Health Lead Paint Hazard Reduction (DeLead) program tonight. He advised members that census data showed that 50,000 children were living in poverty in Delaware. Areas were targeted for lead remediation, lead abatement, and containment of lead-based paint. Mr. Kistler indicated that there was a three (3) year contract with an option for two (2) additional three (3) year extensions for this purpose, noting that the contract was in its second year. Mr. Kistler advised that HUD runs the program, which is a very difficult program administratively, that has amazing outcomes. He indicated that 160 homes had been designated for Healthy Homes; therefore, they would be able to identify and get rid of mold or pest infestation in conjunction with the DeLead program work. Mr. Kistler stated that this was a $1.3M contract for the year ending November 30, 2016, and 37 homes must be completed within the next 90 days. He explained that help is needed to identify these homes. Mr. Kistler reviewed the DeLead - Service Delivery Model on page 4 of the presentation, noting that the young man pictured in the middle of depicts the person FSCAA is trying to help, and if the young lady pictured holding him is pregnant, they are also trying to help her. He noted that Delaware Public Health (DPH) is the grantee and works directly with HUD in Washington, D.C. They would provide $2.7M over a three (3) year period and oversee the program. DPH relies on FSCAA to administer the program and provides leadership and coordination with HUD. Mr. Kistler advised that Delaware Health and Social Services is FSCAA’s gateway, noting that there are 15 service centers in the State, seven (7) or eight (8) of which are in Kent and Sussex Counties. He stated that FSCAA was originally engaged to cover seven (7) zip codes and did such a good job that they were allowed to expand to zip codes throughout Kent and Sussex Counties, which indicated that they were hitting their numbers. Mr. Kistler advised that HUD is very strict and classifies agencies into green, yellow, and red statuses, noting that being in the red status is agonizing. Although FSCAA had a bit of a rough start, he stated that they had successfully remained in the green area and were doing a good job. He felt that DeLead should be a State-wide program; however, they were now focusing on the City of Dover because two (2) of the zip codes in the City had the most houses built before 1978 that are candidates for lead-based paint. Mr. Kistler expressed thanks to Mayor Christiansen for a letter writing campaign that reached out to schools in the Capital School District, Head Start, and the Modern Maturity Center, noting that these types of partnerships are needed to identify children so that FSCAA can follow up and get an audience. He advised that the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) is also a partner with the lead program and had committed funds for the weatherization of 100 homes. Mr. Kistler explained that two (2) members of Council had met with FSCAA and FSCAA would be walking through some of the homes discussed. He informed members that City management, including the City Manager’s Office, Department of Planning and Community Development, and Emergency Management/Public Affairs had been very helpful. Mr. Kistler thanked the Dover Public Library for making space for their program. He expressed the need to know where housing stock is and to work with the school systems, stating that FSCAA is working with the Capital School District to identify children in the elementary schools in residences with lead-based paint and

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 5 determine if they have been affected. Mr. Kistler noted that they are also working with the faith-based community in regard to housing. Mr. Kistler expressed disappointment that FSCAA did not receive the training grant from the Department of Labor. He noted that during the Council Committee of the Whole/Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting, he had expressed excitement about this possibility but would pursue finding ways to employ people in Communities of Promise and to work on lead work and heating/cooling work. Mr. Kistler explained that a portion of their existing grant allows them to train 40 people in the community through Delaware Technical Community College and put them to work through contractors. Mr. Kistler reviewed a map depicting Parcels with Structures Built in 1978 or Earlier (Exhibit #1) and advised members that thanks to Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, and Mr. Kirby Hudson, Assistant City Manager, all of the City’s housing stock from prior to 1978 had been plotted, and this included 4,785 properties. Mr. Kistler stated that 1,025 of these properties were older stock, which would have a higher probability of lead-based paint. He informed members that FSCAA planned to approach the school systems and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) to identify the children and create a map overlay which would show where the children are relative to the location of the housing stock. It could then be determined if these children have elevated blood levels. Mr. Kistler advised that if children were poisoned, this would be addressed as a priority one (1) issue, in the same way that the problems of someone over 60 years old in a winter crisis situation are addressed. He emphasized the need to find these children, have them tested, and remediate the paint. Mr. Kistler stated he was unsure of the number of children affected, but when this question was posed to the Mayor, he indicated that it must be found and corrected transparently, regardless of the number. Mr. Kistler stated that any awareness the City could provide in regard to the lead or summer cooling programs would be appreciated. In regard to the heating program, he stated the need to identify owner-occupied homes, since they could not do repairs or replacements of heater units through a tenant relationship. Mr. Kistler stated his intent to develop a secondary workforce development plan. Mr. Kistler indicated that a young lady, writing on behalf of an elderly woman, had provided him a perspective that he felt was important for members to hear since it said a lot about people in need. He read this work, as follows: Come Into My Home Come into my home. You’ll find me quietly sitting in the cold – sweater on, extra socks on. I worry. Why am I alone yet surrounded by many? Where is my family? Where will I find the money to eat? What if I fall? Who will hear me? Come into my home. Let me bend your ear. No one else listens. I don’t feel so old inside. Does anyone care that my house is old and drafty, that my heat is broken, that I may be broken myself? Please come into my home. Mr. Hutchison asked Mayor Christiansen and Council President Slavin where Council would go from here in regard to this matter. He felt there was an opportunity for the City to embrace this

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 6 program and indicated that he would like to see the City move forward. Responding, Mayor Christiansen advised that since an original meeting was held with FSCAA, a commitment had been made to assist them in any way possible. Efforts were continuing to make sure the goals and mission of FSCAA were accomplished. Mayor Christiansen noted that the City was continuing to work with this fine organization to make sure that those who need these services the most are touched. In response to Mr. Hutchison, Mayor Christiansen estimated that there were approximately 4,800 houses in the City built before the 1970s extending up until nearly the1980s, noting that staff was trying to substantiate that number. Mayor Christiansen advised that the City had to review building permits and tax records to verify this information. Mr. Hutchison moved to strongly endorse the City’s participation and support of this program. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Mr. Slavin stated that Council would invite Mr. Kistler back to provide updates. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 2016-07 - PROPOSING INCLUSION OF WESTFIELD INTO THE KENT COUNTY STORM WATER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that the Kent County government has a program whereby various subdivisions can enter into a maintenance district, with the assistance of the Kent Conservation District being the inspector as well as potentially the contractor, to repair any deficiencies. He stated that this program is offered across Kent County to subdivisions outside incorporated limits as well as those within the incorporated limits of a municipality. Mr. Koenig explained that for subdivisions within a municipality, a resolution must be authorized by city council for the subdivisions to enter into the maintenance district. Mr. Koenig stated that this is how these types of facilities will be maintained in perpetuity. He advised members that staff supports subdivisions entering into maintenance districts with the caveat that if the City of Dover ever creates a stormwater utility, these subdivisions would have to join the City’s utility and forego the maintenance obligations in the County program. Mr. Koenig noted that since the City did not currently have such a program and these facilities are in need of inspection, repair, and maintenance, staff endorses the resolution. Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the Resolution, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and, by a unanimous vote, Resolution No. 2016-07 was adopted, as follows: A RESOLUTION PROPOSING INCLUSION OF WESTFIELD INTO THE KENT COUNTY STORM WATER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT WHEREAS, pursuant to 9 Del. C. §5202 et.seq. and Chapter 187 §90.4E(1) of the Kent County Code, a Petition to extend the stormwater maintenance district for the area known as Westfield was submitted by a majority of the real property owners within the proposed district; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 187 §90.4.E(2) of the Kent County Code, the Kent Conservation District inspected the stormwater management facilities for the proposed stormwater maintenance district, identified required repairs, and developed an operation and maintenance plan; and

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 7 WHEREAS, the property owners of Westfield have requested the Stormwater Maintenance District Complete the required repairs to be repaid over a period of five (5) years; and WHEREAS, Chapter 187 §90.4.E.(7) of the Kent County Code requires that for subdivisions and land developments located within incorporated areas, the petition shall be accompanied by evidence of concurrence of the local governing body. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the proposed stormwater maintenance district expansion is adequate and appropriate; and 2. That all of the property owners within the district are benefitted directly or indirectly thereby; and 3. That it is in the public interest to extend the stormwater maintenance district in the manner proposed; and 4. That the stormwater maintenance infrastructure within Westfield, exclusive of that within Delaware Department of Transportation/City of Dover right-of-way, shall be maintained in accordance with the Operation and Maintenance Plan and that maintenance may include routine maintenance and shall include regular minor and major maintenance as well as emergency repairs as needed, as defined by Chapter 187 §90.4.B of the Kent County Code; and 5. That the inclusion of Westfield within the Stormwater Maintenance District and the resulting infrastructure maintenance managed by the County shall take precedence over any homeowner obligation for stormwater management included in declarations of restrictions or similar development agreements. Any common open space or infrastructure within a community not maintained as part of a stormwater maintenance district shall remain the responsibility of the homeowners; and 6. Inclusion of Westfield with the Stormwater Maintenance District shall not exempt lot owners within the subdivision from participation in a stormwater utility should one be established by the City of Dover; and 7. That the City of Dover Council concurs with the extension of the Stormwater Maintenance District - Westfield. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT - JUNE 14, 2016 The Council Committee of the Whole Meeting was held on June 14, 2016 at 6:13 p.m., with Council President Slavin presiding (departed at 6:15 p.m. and returned at 6:17 p.m.). Members of Council present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Sudler, Mr. Neil (arrived at 6:15 p.m., departed at 6:42 p.m., returned at 6:45 p.m., departed at 7:07 p.m., returned at 7:10 p.m., departed at 7:36 p.m., and returned at 7:40 p.m.), Mr. Lewis (departed at 6:53 p.m.), Mr. Cole, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Hosfelt and Mayor Christiansen were

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 8 absent. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Caldwell and Mrs. Horsey (Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement), Ms. Arndt and Mr. Blakeman (Utility), and Mr. Shevock and Ms. Stewart (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee met with Chairman Sudler presiding. Program Presentation - First State Community Action Agency Mr. Charles Kistler, Program Manager, First State Community Action Agency (FSCAA), advised members that FSCAA is a non-profit organization and is the only Community Action Partnership (CAP) agency in the State of Delaware. He reviewed a presentation entitled “City of Dover Council Briefing - June 13, 2016,” stating that FSCAA has more than 20 programs. Referring to Page 2 of the presentation, Mr. Kistler reviewed the components of the organization’s Healthy Home, Energy Efficiency, Lead Safe, and People Centric (H.E.L.P.) Program, as follows: 1) Department of Public Health (DPH) Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction (DeLead) Program - Mr. Kistler explained that FSCAA’s DeLead program was started in seven (7) targeted zip codes, noting that the two (2) largest zip codes were in the City of Dover, which has some of the oldest housing stock in the State. Mr. Kistler stated that 250 homes were identified as positive for lead, and remediation and abatement was completed, although this was a nominal scratch of the surface. He indicated that City management had been very supportive of this process and had provided documentation on nearly 5,000 homes in the City that were built before 1978. Mr. Kistler explained that 160 Healthy Home Repairs were completed for issues such as pest infestation and mold. 2) Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Summer Cooling Assistance Program (SCAP) - Mr. Kistler advised that FSCAA was in the first year of a five (5) year, Statewide program for SCAP, and City management had been very supportive in getting the exposure needed. He noted that, due to extreme temperatures, many more people need air conditioners. Mr. Kistler explained that Energy Conservation Kits (EcoKits) include LED light bulbs, aerators, low-flow shower heads, night lights, door sweeps, and first aid kits.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 9 3) Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Replace Repair Heaters and Conserve Energy (RRHACE) Program - Mr. Kistler stated that the RRHACE Statewide program started last year and is a five (5) year program that provides for repair and replacement of heaters. He noted that before September 30, 2016, 450 heaters would be repaired or replaced. Mr. Kistler indicated that FSCAA would be working with the City’s code enforcement and property development staff to identify people with no heat. 4) Today’s Reinvestment Around Industry Needs (TRAIN) Program - Mr. Kistler stated that FSCAA had submitted a training plan to the Department of Labor for approval. This program would allow FSCAA to go into communities, identify those who would be eligible for training through community leaders, bring those individuals through a vocational technology program, and put them into jobs in their own neighborhoods, which FSCAA has termed “Communities of Promise.” Mr. Kistler stated that they had asked the City of Dover to write a letter of support for this program, and if FSCAA reaches the implementation phase of this large initiative, they will start to recruit individuals to help their own communities. Mr. Kistler, referring to page 2 of the FSCAA presentation, reviewed the H.E.L.P. - Hub and Spoke Service Delivery Model, explaining that Communities of Promise had been identified as concentrated areas of poverty where community leaders could identify people to be brought in through the Delaware Technical Community College (DTCC) system through a workforce development training plan. Mr. Kistler stated that FSCAA DeLead program has a contractual obligation to identify and train up to 40 people in the Renovation, Repair, and Painting (RRP) formal certification program. He expressed the desire to certify as many people as possible in these communities and put them to work with contractors who perform lead work, creating a path forward for participants. Mr. Kistler indicated that FSCAA is working with DPH in regard to the DeLead Program and with the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) regarding the RRHACE and SCAP programs, and these entities were funding the activity that the agency has planned for the next five (5) years. Mr. Kistler explained that FSCAA had partnerships in place related to the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) weatherization program, Senate Bill 150, the Clean Power Plan (CPP), and the Sustainable Energy Utility (SEU) to identify available funding and craft programs for low-income families. He noted that FSCAA was trusted to be able to identify programs that will bring self-sufficiency to their clients in the communities. Mr. Kistler explained that DHSS and utility providers are gateways that clients are

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 10 moving through to be identified, have their needs assessed, and effectively apply to programs. Mr. Kistler stated that FSCAA is working with an analytical firm from Princeton, New Jersey to develop analytical data to back up that the investment being made in these programs has a legitimate outcome. He informed members that the City was helping FSCAA to share and collaborate on data and was playing a major part in identifying needs in concentrated areas of poverty in the City. He indicated that the Delaware Housing Authority, Wilmington Housing Authority, and Dover Housing Authority needed to identify the properties in the cities that are deficient so that financial resources can be pooled and existing talent can be used to implement programs with good outcomes. Mr. Kistler stated that houses of worship would also be key because of the trust factor. He noted that the City of Dover is the hub of the model. Mr. Kistler, referring to page 4 of the presentation, reviewed the H.E.L.P. Program. He indicated that the FSCAA was not necessarily asking for money, but that his request was more about being able to work collaboratively toward data collection and demographics in the City to leverage combined resources. Mr. Kistler reviewed the ways that the City of Dover could support the Program, as follows: 1) DeLead Collaboration Plan - Mr. Kistler reiterated that there were 5,000 pre-1978 properties that are candidates for this program, noting that children under six (6) years old living in those houses could potentially be poisoned. It was unknown whether or not they were poisoned as there was no requirement to have the children tested. Mr. Kistler indicated that the City Manager had put FSCAA in touch with the superintendent of the school systems, and they were starting to craft a relationship to identify kids that could be tested and match this up against the properties. This would provide a focused idea of where properties are with children who could potentially be poisoned by lead paint and allow them to act. 2) SCAP Collaboration Plan - Mr. Kistler indicated that FSCAA has offices in all three (3) counties, including one (1) in the Blue Hen Mall; however, they do not have a brick and mortar appearance as a community action agency in the forefront and need this. He advised that mass intake is performed every week for the summer cooling program in different counties. Mr. Kistler stated that they were disappointed that more people were not signing up for the program, noting that they sometimes have only 13 people per day at the Blue Hen Mall, and they should have hundreds. He indicated that the FSCAA is asking for help to raise awareness. Mr. Kistler noted that there are eligibility requirements, including being over the age

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 11 of 60, having medically proven breathing issues such as COPD or asthma, having children, being medically challenged, etc. He stated that FSCAA would have 650 air conditioners by September 30, 2016. 3) RRHACE Collaboration Plan - Mr. Kistler stated that they have 450 heating units to be completed by September 30, 2016 and have completed 238. He asked for help identifying clients with no heat now to avoid panic in the fall. 4) TRAIN Collaboration Plan - Mr. Kistler stated that if the agency is blessed with a training grant, they would like to return to the City of Dover. He believed that there would be an 18-month implementation period to identify people in the community that could be trained through DTCC as energy educators and quick-help assessors. Mr. Kistler noted that if these individuals can be certified and put to work in an apprenticeship program, they could do some good and create role models for their communities. He advised that a merger had just taken place that affected Delmarva Power, and they were discussing some type of assistance for people who were in the dunning process and bordering on disconnection of their electricity. Mr. Kistler stated that these individuals would be put into a formal training program. He noted that there was only one (1) energy educator in the State and expressed the desire to create more. Mr. Kistler stated the desire to have the utility companies and electric cooperatives bring individuals into these programs and help FSCAA help clients understand how to become more energy efficient, decrease consumption of energy, and apply these savings toward a better quality of life and less dependence on social programs. Mr. Kistler stated the desire to stay in touch with the City. He expressed FSCAA’s belief that the capital of the State is where their master plan should be laid out, reiterating that the City had a big need. He felt the master plan could then be applied to any city in the State. Mr. Hutchison questioned how long the training and certification program would take. Responding, Mr. Kistler stated that if they receive the grant award in July, participants would be brought in to DTCC in September. Certification would be a one (1) to three (3) week process, depending on the type of certification. He explained that resources would be shared, noting that DTCC has some funding for apprenticeships, FSCAA would have funding from the grant, and the employer would

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 12 be expected to contribute funds. Mr. Kistler stated that they were looking at a 90-day apprenticeship. Mr. Anderson asked Mr. Kistler to elaborate on the FSCAA’s summer jobs program. In response, Mr. Kistler stated that FSCAA will find out in early July if the Department of Labor will approve their training plan, and FSCAA could then provide all relevant information. He noted that all three (3) campuses of DTCC are partnering in regard to workforce development to help train people and get them employed, as is Delmarva Power. Mr. Anderson requested that Mr. Kistler advise him when FSCAA receives information about their grant, noting that he would like to share with Mr. Kistler the names of 400 people who need jobs. Mr. Anderson asked if Mr. Kistler needed anything from the City, or if staff needed something from Council in this regard. Responding, Mr. Kirby Hudson, Assistant City Manager, advised that he had been responding to Mr. Kistler’s requests and staff was trying to do what they could to support FSCAA. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, stated that staff wanted FSCAA to come before Council to promote their program, and requested that Council members who prepare newsletters or electronic communications help in this regard. He stated that this was a rare instance where someone was coming to the City with human and financial resources behind them and asking for the City to help establish community contacts. Mr. Koenig explained that FSCAA staff had experienced difficulty in getting people to answer their doors when they are out knocking and advised that contacts provided by members could help. He felt this was a wonderful opportunity for the community. Mr. Slavin stated that FSCAA could be placed on the agenda for a Regular City Council meeting, which would be televised and might be an opportunity to get the word out in another venue. Mr. Kistler responded favorably, stating the desire to create as much awareness as possible. Mr. Slavin indicated that the City Clerk’s Office would get in touch with Mr. Kistler. Update - Residential Appeal Process and Non-Compliant/Non-Conforming Uses During their meeting of January 11, 2016, Council approved the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee’s recommendation that staff be requested to prepare a residential appeal process and to also look at those properties within City limits that are clearly non-compliant with the uses to be reviewed by the Committee during their March meeting. During the Council Committee of the Whole/Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee meeting of March 15, 2016, Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, reminded members that the first step in this process would be to determine the degree of the problem with non-conforming uses by finding out how many such uses exist. She advised that her staff had been working with the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) staff in the Public Works Department, and they were in the process of developing an application that would allow the City’s planners to go into the field and document non-conforming uses. Mrs. Townshend stated that staff could then

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 13 determine which of the non-conforming uses would be permitted as a conditional use, noting that multi-family residential uses would not be permitted any longer in certain residential zones. From that point, a strategy could be developed on how to attrition non-conforming uses. During the Committee meeting of June 14, 2016, Mrs. Townshend stated that two (2) members of the Planning Department staff were going out to identify each non- conforming use in residential zones. In her last discussion with these staff members, the process was moving slower than expected. She advised that one (1) quarter of the geographic area of the City was complete, and they estimated completion in two (2) months. Mrs. Townshend advised that once staff has a picture of non-conforming uses, they would bring forward the language and proposed process to sunset those uses. Mr. Slavin stated appreciation for the effort to complete a 100% census; however, he questioned whether a representative sample could be relied on, noting that this could be approached in broad categories of uses. Responding, Mrs. Townshend stated her understanding that all non-conforming uses in residential zones would be sunsetted and, if this was so, all such uses must be identified. Mr. Slavin questioned if such uses could be sunsetted in a blanket ordinance adopted by Council. He expressed frustration because it was taking a long time to get to a solution, and in the interim non-conforming uses were continuing to cause problems. Mr. Slavin noted that there had been a recent problem, with the root cause being a bar operating in the heart of a neighborhood in the middle of the Fourth District. He indicated that everything the City does, including police enforcement, cameras, street cleaning, and picking up garbage, would not correct the problem until there is no longer a bar in the middle of a residential area. Mrs. Townshend stated that this could be approached in several ways. She explained that if all non-conforming properties are not sunsetted, there would be a need for fair system to handle them. Mrs. Townshend advised that a section in the Code could be developed under non-conforming uses to deal with those uses that have been determined to be a nuisance and criteria could be set to bring them forward more expeditiously. She indicated that when this matter was considered by the Committee in December, she shared her belief regarding the proper methodology and had stated that it would be very time consuming and labor intensive, and no Council members had told her to do this differently. Mr. Slavin stated his concern regarding the statement that 25% of the properties had been completed in six (6) months and that the other 75% would be completed in two (2) months. In response, Mrs. Townshend explained that staff had to develop a tablet application to be used for this process. She indicated that she had been very up front that this project would take a lot of time and labor. Mrs. Townshend offered to move forward in a different way if that was what Council wanted; however, she explained that she was proceeding in the way that she previously outlined.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 14 Mr. Slavin stated that he is sensitive to not micro-managing staff; however, this was taking a little longer than he was comfortable with. Although he did not wish to speak for others, he expressed his opinion of the need to get to a solutions-based approach rather than data gathering. In response to Mr. Hare regarding a retail business that is set up across from K-Mart, Mrs. Townshend explained that this was not a case of non-conforming use, explaining that a business license was issued for this enterprise under policies that existed in the past. She indicated that the business license would expire in the current month, would not be reissued, and the business owner was aware of this. Mrs. Townshend explained that a non-conforming use is a use that was legal when it was established but the zoning had changed so that it is no longer a permitted use. She noted that the most numerous non-conforming uses seen in the City were houses that had been carved into apartments. Mrs. Townshend advised that the Elks’ Club on Kirkwood Street and a liquor store on Forest Street were non-conforming uses. When the issue of non-conforming uses first came up, she spoke with Mr. William Pepper, Deputy City Solicitor, who was very clear that the City needed to be fair and consistent in how non-conforming uses are dealt with, and Mrs. Townshend had used this approach in developing a process. She indicated that if another process were developed, it must be fair and consistent. Mr. Sudler asked if it would be fair to use a process that is complaint driven, since this type of process is used for code enforcement. Responding, Mrs. Townshend stated her belief that if this approach is used, there would need to be some type of due process and non-conforming uses could not be administratively expired. She explained that properties could go to the Board of Adjustment or another body to determine if a non-conforming use should expire, and this would require a Code amendment. Mrs. Townshend indicated that if Council wanted a Code amendment in advance of the other part of the process, she could bring one forward; however, this had not been discussed in the past. Mr. Anderson expressed appreciation to Mrs. Townshend and her staff for the work being done, noting that this was a lot of work added to what they are already doing. He concurred with Mr. Slavin that it was a bit frustrating, which he stated was why he and Mr. Sudler brought up the idea of a complaint-driven approach several months ago. Mr. Anderson hoped that this would be looked into, noting that all non- conforming uses are not equal. He loved the idea of looking at nuisance non- conforming uses because there are many non-conforming uses that no one knows are there. Mr. Anderson expressed the need to distinguish those uses that are a problem. Now that staff had invested much time and effort into the process, he did not want them to stop, and start a new process; however, he asked if staff could start working on something for nuisances in the community, in the meantime.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 15 Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Townshend stated that this could happen concurrently. She stated that if nuisances are being dealt with separately and language is added to the Code that specifically sets up a list of criteria and a process, this could be brought forward ahead of the full survey. Mrs. Townshend advised that the approach had started with expiring all non-conforming uses. She reminded members that the language in the Code regarding non-conforming uses in residential zones indicates that these uses would expire 20 years after the adoption of the ordinance or 40 years from initiation of the use. Mrs. Townshend noted that staff was unable to determine when the ordinance was adopted and, without having the full picture, that section of Code cannot be used to say that the 20 years had passed and the uses must expire. She stated that other language could be added to the Code in the meantime that would accomplish this. Mr. Anderson asked if the current research would only identify non-conforming uses or indicate when those uses were granted. Responding, Mrs. Townshend explained that staff’s current fieldwork was identifying the uses, which would be entered in a table. She indicated that other data could be pulled in, but she was unsure if there would be a good data source for exactly when uses started. Mr. Anderson stated the need to be very careful about property rights of those who had invested their life savings; however, he noted that the rights of other people to live in reasonable peace also needed to be protected. He asked if staff was proceeding based on geography or by categories, and questioned which 25% portion of the City had been done and what was outstanding. In response, Mrs. Townshend advised that staff started working on the east side of the City and had gotten to the area east of the highway, and the northern part of the downtown area, north of Mary Street. She stated that when working further west in some of the newer developments, the number of non-conforming uses would decrease and less time would be required. Mrs. Townshend noted that some of the newer developments had been crossed off the list because staff knew there were no such uses. She informed members that staff had started the Fairview area and was moving south. Mrs. Townshend indicated that the next step would be the downtown area, which would be very labor intensive. Mr. Slavin advised that his comments were not reflective of poor work on data gathering; however, he felt that perhaps the results of the work could be used more quickly. He referred to Mrs. Townshend’s comment that the existing section of Code states that non-conforming uses would be expired 20 years after the adoption of that ordinance or 40 years from their initiation. Mr. Slavin stated that this section of Code could be repealed if it no longer serves a purpose and another section could be put in its place to state that as of a certain date, all non-conforming uses in the City are repealed and the City will take action against them upon discovery. Mr. Slavin indicated that this approach would be similar to other things done in the City, noting that not everyone is 100% in compliance with the rules, and rules are enforced when non-compliance is found. Referring to houses that had been carved into apartments, he indicated this is the example that he would use to say that they will be corrected

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 16 when discovered on a case-by-case basis. Mr. Slavin believed that if all properties were addressed at once, the Planning Department would be choked with appeals. He agreed with Mr. Anderson that the City would want to honor legitimate uses, such as a church located in a certain area. Mr. Slavin stated that if staff paused with 25% of the properties complete and asked Council to take the action needed to clean up the Code, which he felt all members would be glad to do, staff could begin the enforcement process with the identified properties. In response to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Slavin did not feel that his suggested approach needed to take the form of a motion. He thought that Mrs. Townshend had heard the concerns and suggested that she return in one (1) month with an update. Citizen Suggestions Mr. Anderson stated that a citizen had advised him that a building had been purchased and was immediately set up for rehabilitation in order to be occupied; however, previous vacant building fines did not reset and the individual had to pay these fines on top of the money for rehabilitation. This citizen suggested that a six (6) month window be allowed for marketing and rehabilitation when there is a transfer like this. UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee met with Chairman Cole presiding. Chairman Cole recognized Ms. Tricia Arndt as a new member of the Utility Committee and thanked her for accepting the appointment. Differential Disposal Fee Agreement - Delaware Solid Waste Authority Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that the Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) was created more than 30 years ago to handle municipal waste through the State of Delaware, and the City had a good relationship with the DSWA. He explained that the City is not in the landfill business and has a contractual relationship with the DSWA. Mr. Koenig indicated that the proposed differential disposal fee agreement would memorialize that relationship from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2021. He stated that the gate charge would be reduced for the next five (5) years, with the result that spending in FY 2021 would be approximately the same amount that was currently being paid to the DSWA. Mr. Koenig stated that the agreement would offer a rebate and set the gate charge at $85 per ton. The prescriptive rebate would be included on the City’s bill that would be issued twice per year, on February 15th and August 15th for that year of tonnage. Mr. Koenig stated that in recent history, all of these agreements had come before Council for approval; however, he noted that the City does not have another place to take its waste in the State of Delaware, and it would not be desired to cross state lines with waste. He advised that the contract being presented was the same contract being offered to all municipalities in the State.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 17 Staff recommended authorizing the City Manager to execute the proposed Differential Disposal Fee Agreement with the Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) to provide municipal solid waste disposal service for the City of Dover from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2021 at the rates set forth in the agreement. The Committee recommended approval of staff’s recommendation. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hosfelt and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Quarterly Review of Utility Related Capital Investment Plan (CIP) (Electric and Water/Wastewater) (January, February, and March) Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed the Quarterly Report for the Capital Investment Plan (CIP) as of March 31, 2016. He advised that this report was prepared by the Finance Department and summarizes the finances for each project identified in the CIP. In regard to Water/Wastewater Improvement & Extension Fund - Major CIP Projects, Mr. Koenig noted that a number of projects were listed as being in process, explaining that staff had been diligently working through the capital plan. He stated that construction timelines do not match budget timelines, and some project carry-forwards must be rebudgeted. Mr. Koenig advised that when project budget difficulties have occurred, staff came before Council to amend project budgets; however, projects were generally moving forward. He stated that staff had gravitated toward doing design features for water/sewer projects during the first year, with construction typically occurring the next year. Mr. Koenig indicated that this routine had been used, for example, for pump station upgrades. He noted that staff had been working for some time on the 1M gallon elevated storage tank location. Mr. Koenig reminded members that staff had proposed a location several years ago that met with public resistance. Since that time, staff had been negotiating a second site and had passed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) back and forth with a property owner for the better part of a year. Mr. Koenig stated that the attorneys had finished their reviews and it was believed that final closure of that location was close. He informed members that once a final MOU is signed, staff would come back before Council to discuss how that project would move forward. Mr. Koenig stated that this was the longest running project. Mr. Koenig stated that the Garrison improvements had been constructed and were in place. Staff was working on project closeout documentation and final release of payments. A number of current projects were progressing with construction. In regard to electric components of the CIP, Mr. Koenig advised that Mr. Harry Maloney, Electric Director, had completed the General Scott Switchgear project. The station was in operation and the project would be closed out this fiscal year. The Garrison Oak Transmission Line Relocation was complete, as was construction of the Van Sant Capacity Increase, and project documentation would be closed out. Mr. Koenig stated that the Electric Department had done a very good job of working through the capital plan. He advised members that Mr. Maloney had staff

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 18 in place so that design features could be completed in-house or externally, projects could move through the capital system to completion, and the assets could be put in operation. Mr. Koenig stated that he was very happy with the work that had been done both on the Public Works side under the water/sewer utility and the electric side and believed that the City’s customers could see the benefits of these systems being improved over time. Updates Green Energy Funding and Programming Members reviewed details regarding Green Energy Funding and Programming, as of April 21, 2016. National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that staff had been exchanging a document related to the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit back and forth with the Department of Natural Resources and Control (DNREC) and it was expected to be finalized in the next 30-60 days. He noted that staff had been working on compliance issues over the last year to year-and-a-half. Mr. Koenig indicated that the City’s Environmental Scientist, who was heading up this program, had left the City to work in the private sector and this position would be advertised shortly so that permit compliance can be resolved. Mr. Koenig stated that staff was starting to get all of the permit activities embedded into the operations of the Public Works Department and other departments that have influence on the permit. He felt that the City was moving toward compliance, noting that the FY 17 budget has many items that are cost drivers for the Public Works Department that are related to compliance, including monitoring and operational issues. Mr. Koenig informed members that the City was working through the system to achieve compliance at the DNREC level. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Chairman Hare presiding. Mr. Hare welcomed Dr. Courtney Stewart, who previously served on the Utility Committee, as a new member of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee. Kent County Secondary Intensive Learning Center School Resource Officer (SRO) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Police Chief Paul Bernat advised members that the City of Dover Police Department currently has a partnership with the Capital School District and has three (3) School Resource Officers (SROs), one (1) at Dover High School, one (1) at Central Middle

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 19 School, and one (1) at Parkway Academy Central. The District pays $100,000 for the officers at Dover High School and Central Middle School and $60,000 for the SRO at Parkway Academy Central. He indicated that there is also a Gang Resistance Education and Awareness Training (GREAT) officer. Chief Bernat requested permission to enter into another agreement with the Kent County Secondary Intensive Learning Center (ILC) School for another SRO. He explained that he had met with Dr. Dan Shelton, Superintendent, Capital School District, and his staff and developed an agreement similar to the Parkway Academy Central agreement. Chief Bernat informed members that the Police Department is authorized 101 police officers and there would be a resignation effective June 30, 2016. He stated that he would like to remain at a strength of 101 officers, send a police officer to the Academy in September, and enter into this agreement with the Capital School District for FY 17, FY 18, and FY 19. Staff recommended authorizing the Chief of Police to negotiate and sign the final Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the placement of a School Resource Officer (SRO) at the Kent County Secondary Intensive Learning Center site for the next three (3) years (FY 2017, FY 2018 and FY 2019). The Committee recommended approval of staff’s recommendation. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hosfelt and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Disposition of Excess Property - 29 South Governors Avenue and 749 West North Street Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, informed members that the City had acquired several properties over the years through demolition of structures, subsequent levying of the demolition liens, and acquiring these properties through sheriff’s sales. He indicated that 29 South Governors Avenue and 749 West North Street had been declared excess property by Council; however, in the declaration, Mr. Koenig was required to dispose of them using the standard method of disposition, which is typically the public bidding process. These properties were advertised for public bid last year and no offers were received. Mr. Koenig advised that staff was preparing to put these properties out for bid again; however, Mr. Michael Maupin, Managing Director, MauTiste Investment Group, submitted an unsolicited bid for these properties. Mr. Koenig stated that, Mr. William Pepper, Deputy City Solicitor, had indicated that it would not be a good idea for Mr. Koenig to act on this administratively and that he should bring this matter before Council for their recommendation on accepting the proposals. Mr. Koenig noted that the offered price for 29 South Governors Avenue was $8,000 and for 749 West North Street was $18,000, for a total of $26,000. Mr. Koenig stated that demolition and other related expenses had been identified, and if these offers were accepted the City would have to write off approximately $17,718.35 in loss; however, the properties would be put back into private sector hands. He advised that Mr. Maupin intended to develop the properties and, once developed, they would go back on the tax rolls. Mr. Koenig

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 20 believed one (1) of the properties was located in the Downtown Development District (DDD), and depending on how they are redeveloped, the property that is not in the DDD would go back on the tax rolls immediately. The tax rebate guidelines for the DDD would apply to the other property in the DDD. Mr. Koenig stated that, in general, these redevelopments would be positive for the City since there would be new structures, hopefully owner-occupied homes, and there would no longer be vacant pieces of land. He noted that currently the City was incurring cost to mow the grass and dispose of any debris. Staff recommended authorizing the City Manager to accept the offers from MauTiste Investment Group in the amount of $8,000 for 29 South Governors Avenue and $18,000 for 749 West North Street and write-off the remaining expenses and charges in the combined amount of $17,718.35 for these properties. Mr. Koenig advised that Mr. Maupin was present and had provided an updated letter, dated June 9, 2026, stating that the Mautiste Investment Group is prepared to extend the expiration date of their offer to purchase the properties. Mr. Koenig noted that the previously provided letter had expired. Mr. Shevock asked if the properties would remain exempt from taxes until a house is actually built. Responding, Mr. Koenig explained that the property at 749 West North Street is not in the DDD; therefore, the purchaser would have to pay FY 17 property taxes on the raw land and may be subject to additional taxes on improvements made in FY 17. He indicated that the property at 29 South Governors Avenue would potentially be in the DDD, and improvements made to the property would not necessarily go onto the tax rolls immediately since there is a roll-in period for new improvements. Mr. Koenig stated that the purchaser would most likely have to pay the land tax associated with this property, but if improvements are made in the near future, the roll-in for full property tax value of the land and structure would be in accordance with the district guidelines. The Committee recommended authorizing the City Manager to accept the offers from MauTiste Investment Group in the amount of $8,000 for 29 South Governors Avenue and $18,000 for 749 West North Street and write-off the remaining expenses and charges in the combined amount of $17,718.35 for these properties, as recommended by staff. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hosfelt and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Discussion - Tax Account Delinquency Listing Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reminded members that he had previously sent the Tax Account Delinquency Listing as of May 31, 2016 to members of Council and indicated that he would be willing to discuss placing the list on the City’s website during a Committee meeting. He informed members that staff had previously posted this listing on the City of Dover website going back to 2011-2012; however, it had

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 21 stopped being updated on the website. He stated that he would like to start posting the list on the website to encourage people to review it and become non-delinquent. Mr. Koenig noted that delinquencies on the list range from a few dollars because of late charges, etc., to thousands of dollars because people do not want to, or have not paid their taxes. He advised that staff was looking for the lowest cost way to get delinquent taxes collected and staff had done a good job in addressing this over the last couple of years. Mr. Koenig informed members that as of June 1, 2016, approximately $111,0000 in tax delinquency was due from all years. Mr. Koenig noted that the list included locations that are familiar to everyone, where payment has not been made for one (1) reason or another. He expressed the desire to minimize the amount of time needed for staff to reach out to these people to encourage them to make their accounts current. Mr. Anderson expressed his opinion that there should be a $10 or $25 level in the list that screens delinquencies, stating that someone may think they are paid up and be suddenly put on a public list because they owe a small amount. He believed this is excessive and ridiculous. Mr. Anderson stated that something may be listed in error and did not wish to unnecessarily embarrass people for a small delinquency, such as $5.83. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that he understood Mr. Anderson’s point and Council could create a bar if they desired; however, he felt that any bar above zero (0) would have some outstanding balances on it. While in some cases these delinquencies were relatively minor, Mr. Koenig indicated that there are accounting issues that must be cleaned up whether the amount owed is $5.83, $50.83, or $500.83, and the City still has an obligation to collect it. He explained that Mr. William Pepper, Deputy City Solicitor, had advised that staff did not have the right to write-off penalties. Mr. Koenig stated that these parties had been notified that monies were due and still had not paid outstanding bills, so the City was incurring dollars to send notifications. He did not believe the City should be incurring those costs but should post the list to encourage people to look at it and pay all amounts owed. Mr. Anderson stated that posting the list would not alleviate staff from having to do the other items. He felt that just because the list is posted did not mean that the party would see it. Mr. Anderson believed, at the very least, that the party would pay the penalty when they see it on their next property tax bill. In response, Mr. Koenig stated that this is potentially correct; however, the charge may carry forward and not be paid the next time. He indicated that he was looking for people to call their neighbors and friends to say that an amount is owed, which would mean more than the City asking them to pay the fee. Mr. Koenig noted that it is a time-consuming process for staff to call or send letters to people on a list, such as the current 14-page list, to inform them that they will not be bothered if they are below a $25 threshold and the fee will carry over to the next year. He felt that this would be time consuming and put staff at a greater disadvantage regarding why one (1) party is called versus another. Mr. Koenig reiterated that he wanted people to pay the fees because they are owed to the City.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 22 Mr. Anderson questioned why the list would not just be flagged in the computer so that customers who come in to pay their electric, water, and sewer bill would be asked by Customer Service if they would like to pay any delinquent taxes owed. He felt this would be more effective in collecting the money. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that this may be easier to do as the City upgrades to the Enterprise Resource Program (ERP). He had not examined the screen at Customer Service to see if there is a flag that pops up regarding taxes when someone pays their electric bill, so he was unsure if this was possible; however, he pointed out that this would be another step incurred at the administrative level and there would be a cost for this. Although he could not detail the cost at this time, he noted that it would equate to some dollar amount. Mr. Slavin expressed confusion about why the City would want to coddle those who do not pay their bills on time. He stated that the City is compassionate when people face issues in paying for their utilities. This takes only one (1) conversation with the customer, and they are then accommodated by setting up any kind of payment plan that they need. Mr. Slavin felt that there were some people on the list that fall into this category; however, he did not believe that everyone did. He advised that there were names on the list that he and others in the room recognized as people of means in the community who had chosen not to pay their bills on time and have the City incur additional costs to have them paid. Mr. Slavin felt that 98% of the property owners pay their bills on time and 2% require staff time to chase down. He felt it would be prudent to put the word out, noting that the list is a matter of public record that had already been included in a City Council meeting packet. Mr. Slavin stated that he supported what Mr. Koenig and Mr. Kirby Hudson, Assistant City Manager, had been trying to do on this matter and in regard to utility payments. He also supported the compassion customers had been shown by Customer Service agents in dealing with those who cannot pay on time. Mr. Cole agreed with Mr. Slavin. Referring to Mr. Koenig’s comment that the delinquency list had been posted in the past, Mr. Cole questioned why this was discontinued. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that he was unsure. He advised that at one time there was a link to the list on the home page of the website. Mr. Koenig noted that if a list is posted on July 1st, when the tax bills go out, the list has hundreds of pages, so it would not be appropriate to post it at that time. He thought perhaps that staff stopped posting it at the end of a fiscal year and, for some reason, it did not get posted as it became a truly delinquent list. Mr. Hare asked if the City is able to issue business licenses for those with delinquent taxes. Responding, Mr. Koenig advised that controls have been put in place for business licenses, building permits, and development applications to invoke clean hands. He stated that all departments are aware of the Clean Hands Ordinance. Mr. Koenig indicated that he could not say that staff takes advantage of every opportunity with respect to the Ordinance; however, this issue is sometimes caught by the Planning Department, Customer Service, and City Manager’s Office. He stated that as the City potentially replaces its financial systems, it will probably

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 23 become easier to catch these issues, noting that currently it is sometimes necessary to go into multiple screens to find out what is owed. Mr. Hare stated that some of the delinquencies are quite large and are known businesses, and they should be made note of when it is time to renew licenses. Mr. Koenig stated that staff had worked on whittling down the delinquency listing and the backlog at Customer Service. He advised members that when August 31st arrives and FY 17 is delinquent, he would ideally like to send out a very direct Clean Hands letter saying that if a party does not pay soon, the City reserves the right to cut their power. Mr. Koenig noted that this would not be customer friendly and he was trying to balance reality with getting the bills paid. He indicated that it would be difficult to send this letter out because it could affect business operations. Mr. Koenig explained that, in some cases, people have triple net leases where the property owner may have had to pay the property tax, is waiting for a business to pay him, and everyone is pointing their finger at someone else. He felt that as this message gets stronger to the residential and business communities, people will pay on time and staff will not have to send additional letters because people will know that if they do not pay on time and keep current, they will be subject to disconnection. Mr. Koenig stated that some businesses do not mind accruing a late penalty and do not provide an explanation as to why they are not offended by the late penalty accruing. He advised that they hold the money and pay the tax when it is convenient for them or when the City threatens a sheriff’s sale or gets into the issue of Clean Hands. Whatcoat Village Revitalization Payment-in-Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. had proposed the revitalization of Whatcoat Village, 992 Whatcoat Village Drive. Mr. Koenig referred to the draft Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) agreement between the City of Dover and Whatcoat Community Development, Inc., explaining that this was very similar to a previous discussion regarding the revitalization of the Walker Woods development by the Milford Housing Development Corporation. Mr. Koenig explained that the owner of Whatcoat Village Apartments had applied for tax exemption through the City of Dover Board of Assessment Appeals, which was approved because of the 501(c)(3) designation and their history of qualifying for this designation. He advised that Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. wanted to be a good neighbor and had offered a PILOT agreement. This agreement was similar to the Milford Housing Development Corporation agreement that was executed for the redevelopment of Walker Woods and was prepared by the same attorney. Mr. Koenig indicated that the City Manager’s Office was supportive of the proposed agreement, noting that he would like to discuss minor adjustments to the agreement with the attorney in order to finalize it. He noted that the Walker Woods agreement had a small escalator that was not included in this draft agreement. Mr. Koenig advised that in the case of Walker Woods, Council reviewed the draft agreement and turned it over to Mr. Koenig to finalize, and it was placed on file with the City Clerk’s and Tax

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 24 Assessor’s Offices. He noted that the proposed agreement is different from Walker Woods where the City released a road right-of-way. In this instance there would not be the same release of property. Staff recommended authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a final agreement with Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. regarding a proposed PILOT agreement for Whatcoat Village located at 992 Whatcoat Village Drive. Mr. Hutchison asked if a strong management program would be in place to oversee operations on a day-to-day basis. Responding, Ms. Vandana Sareen, Vice President of Development, Michaels Development Company, stated that Mr. William Hill was serving as Chairman of the Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. board. Ms. Sareen indicated that they were working together as partners to redevelop the 78- unit project. She explained that Interstate Realty Management would be the management agent and management was available onsite. In response to Mr. Hutchison as to whether they had experience, Ms. Sareen stated that the community was developed approximately 35 years ago and there had been no capital improvements at the property since. Ten years ago, Interstate Realty Management, which is an arm of the Michaels Development Company, was hired by Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. to perform management. They had now received some funding to help bring the units to current market standards and improve the physical assets of the property. Ms. Sareen stated that a lot of upgrades would be done; however, affordable housing tenants would still be targeted and the population served would be similar to the current population. The Committee recommended authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a final agreement with Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. regarding a proposed PILOT agreement for Whatcoat Village located at 992 Whatcoat Village Drive, as recommended by staff. Mr. Anderson thanked Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. for entering into this agreement and hoped that others would do the same. During the Council meeting, Mr. Hare, Chairman of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee, reminded members that Whatcoat Village had submitted a draft Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) agreement between the City of Dover and Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. He explained that this was very similar to a previous agreement for Milford Housing Authority; however, in this case, the City would still maintain the roads. Mr. Lewis stated that this was previously discussed during the Council Committee of the Whole /Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting which is not televised for the public to hear, and requested Mr. Koenig to give the public an overall explanation. Mr. Lewis expressed his belief that Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. should be paying their fair share. He noted that some constituents had approached him and questioned what Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. would be paying in lieu of taxes.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 25 Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Koenig stated that Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. is proposing to revitalize Whatcoat Village Apartments, located at 992 Whatcoat Village Drive, Dover, Delaware, noting that this project will cause the substantial rehabilitation of all the existing units. He informed members that Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. is a recognized 501(c)(3) corporation and has a charitable mission of providing affordable housing opportunities to families and individuals of low income. Mr. Koenig stated that this property was granted tax exemption by the Board of Assessment Appeals with the recommendation that Council consider a PILOT payment as a contribution to the City to provide certain public services. He indicated that there are currently 78 rent restricted apartments on the property. It was his understanding that all 78 apartments would be renovated and there would still be 78 upon completion of the renovation. Mr. Koenig stated that, due to the 501(c)(3) designation, this project is exempt from taxation pursuant to the Delaware Code. He advised that the attorneys working with Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. had submitted a draft PILOT agreement to the City for a proposed amount of $9,000 per year, and the existing tax levy on the property is currently $16,956.54. Mr. Koenig stated that staff had requested that the City Manager be authorized to negotiate the final terms of the agreement, with the minimum payment of $9,000 per year and that this agreement be made similar to the one (1) that was granted for the Milford Housing Development Corporation for the redevelopment of Walker Woods subdivision. He explained that the difference between Whatcoat Village and Walker Woods was that the City actually abandoned a street that ran through the middle of Walker Woods and gave up services for street sweeping, street lighting, etc. In this case, Whatcoat Drive is located adjacent to the property and not incorporated into the actual property. It is a cutout right-of-way that is not part of the revitalization project, so the City is would not give up any maintenance responsibilities or forego any infrastructure related to this proposal. Mr. Koenig stated that this is consistent with the fact that housing redevelopment corporations for charitable purposes have by right a tax exempt status. In this case, they were offering a PILOT to compensate the City for emergency services for the residents, such as fire, ambulance, police, etc. Mr. Lewis stated that he was satisfied with the explanation but that he would like to see a thorough study of all the tax exempt properties, and review and recommendations from the City Assessor’s Office. Referring to the Milford Housing Development Corporation, Mr. Sudler asked what the difference was between the assessed value of their property and what they are paying. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that he did not bring those numbers with him; however, it was his recollection that the PILOT agreement was for $7,500 per year and included an escalator. It was his belief that the tax on that property was between $12,000 and $14,000 per year. Mr. Koenig indicated that he would have to confirm these numbers. Mr. Hosfelt asked if Mr. Koenig was saying that the City had to comply with this by State law since Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) corporation. In response, Mr. Koenig explained that the tax exemption was granted by the Board of Assessment Appeals and this was an offer to pay at least $9,000 to the City for services. He expressed his opinion that the City should not turn this down. Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation to authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a final agreement with Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. regarding

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 26 a proposed PILOT agreement for Whatcoat Village located at 992 Whatcoat Village Drive, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Lewis indicated that City services are not free and something is better than nothing. He stated that the City would be getting $9,000; however, he had heard a lot of concerns from constituents in the Second District who own small businesses, are homeowners, and have to pay their fair share of taxes. Mr. Sudler stated that, although he respected Mr. Lewis’ position, this is a 501(c)(3) faith-based organization and other churches could be assessed the same amount. He expressed his belief that a PILOT agreement is more than fair, noting that they were not legally obligated to pay any type of financial restitution. Responding, Mr. Lewis stated that he was aware of that; however, he thought that everybody needed to pay their fair share, even if they fall under tax exemption. Mr. Lewis indicated that there should be no more tax welfare and cost shifting to the homeowners and small businesses that do pay their fair share of property taxes, noting that he feels this was unfair. The motion for approval of the Committee’s recommendation to authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a final agreement with Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. regarding a proposed PILOT agreement for Whatcoat Village located at 992 Whatcoat Village Drive, as recommended by staff, was carried with Mr. Lewis voting no. Evaluation of Requests for Proposals Collection Agency Services Mr. Kirby Hudson, Assistant City Manager, informed members that on May 22, 2003, the City entered into a contract with Capital Credit Services, which was subsequently acquired by First Collect, which came to fruition on September 1, 2014. He stated that a number of City customers had accounts that were at or above $90,000, and First Collect was having a difficult time collecting because many parties were moving out of the general area where the collections agency was licensed to pursue them. Mr. Hudson stated that it became paramount to engage an agency that could collect in all 50 states, noting that Dover is a transient area with many military and college students. Mr. Hudson indicated that the contract with First Collect does not have an expiration date; however, there is a stipulation that either party can submit a 30-day letter to be released from the contract. Mr. Hudson advised members that staff was recommending removing the current collection agency and moving on to a new agency based on a Request for Proposals (RFP) that was issued several months ago. Members were provided a document entitled “City of Dover Collection Agency Services Contract, RFP Number 16-0033CM” and Mr. Hudson reviewed the Decision Scale regarding RFP submissions. Members were advised that candidates chosen were licensed and authorized to collect in all fifty (50) states; provide skip tracing, scrubs, and credit bureau reporting. The three (3) major credit reporting agencies are Experian, Trans Union, and Equifax. The importance of these factors are directly related to the City of Dover’s ability to collect military accounts as well

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 27 as other transient accounts. All companies listed offer services similar in nature and are comparable in terms of auto dialer and times calls, paper correspondence, and consumer dispute resolution. Each company has provided a Collectors Code of Ethics and regulatory requirements for Federal, State, and Local Guidelines; to include Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Mr. Hudson indicated that of the eight (8) proposals received, three (3) companies were considered to be the top candidates: SIMM Associates, Inc., Penn Credit Corporation, and Progressive Financial. Based on the criteria (10-point scale), SIMM Associates, Inc., provided positive scoring in all areas except minority business. If positive negotiations were to fail, it was recommended that Penn Credit be considered. Mr. Hudson pointed out that there was an error in the Recommended Action section of the Committee Action Form previously provided. He explained that, although it had been indicated that “Fees are based on a percentage of revenue collected,” this was incorrect and the City would pay nothing for collection services. He explained that currently anyone who goes to collections with First Credit must pay a 35% contingency fee; therefore, 35% is tacked on to whatever they owe the City. Mr. Hudson advised that SIMM Associates, Inc., would have a 20% fee. For example, if a customer owed the City $100, the total fee would be $120, with the City receiving $100 and SIMM Associates keeping $20. SIMM Associates would not be paid unless they collect, and if they collect they would add their 20% and the service would be free to the City. Mr. Hudson stated that staff recommended authorization to negotiate and sign a final, three (3) year agreement with SIMM Associates, Inc. He noted that this would remove First Credit. Mr. Shevock recused himself from voting on this matter for personal reasons. Members were provided a Trial Balance Report prepared May 31, 2016. Mr. Hudson noted that Line 21 reflected balances over 30, 60 and 90 days for residential energy. He advised that this was highlighted to indicate the amount of funds owed for electric bills; however, a new collection agency would pursue all amounts listed in the report. In response to Mr. Hare, Mr. Hudson indicated that SIMM Associates, Inc. would also be collecting delinquent tax bills. The Committee recommended authorizing staff to negotiate and sign a final three (3) year agreement with SIMM Associates, Inc. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hosfelt and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 28 Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Maintenance and Repair Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that proposals were solicited and advertised according to City policy by the City’s Contract and Procurement Manager under RFP #16-0040PW for Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Maintenance and Repair. Submissions were received from four (4) contractors. One (1) was deemed non-responsive and the other three (3) were evaluated by cost and performance. Based on that evaluation, staff recommended awarding a contract to A. A. Duckett, Inc., which would include four (4) quarterly preventative maintenance services, as well annual preventative maintenance services for each of the units. Mr. Koenig stated that standby and emergency rates were also incorporated into the proposal. Staff recommended awarding a three (3) year contract with the option for two (2) one (1) year extensions to A.A. Duckett, Inc. as per the proposal submitted in response to RFP #16-0040PW. Mr. Hare noted that the rates between John Hiott Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Inc., and A. A. Duckett, Inc. were very close. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that there was a slight difference in the tech rate; however, the after hours and general labor rates were very similar. Mr. Hare questioned why a company from New Jersey was selected rather than a company from Wyoming, Delaware. Responding, Mr. Koenig explained that staff was interested in overall performance and liked the discussion about safety records that A. A. Duckett provided, noting that HVAC services had been a challenge for staff. He stated that staff preferred this company because they have a good performance record in the documentation submitted. Mr. Hare asked if A. A. Duckett had a facility in Delaware, and Mr. Koenig responded that they did not and were being dispatched out of New Jersey; however, he was unsure where their staff actually lives and if they take their trucks home at night. He advised that they had stated they could meet the City’s standards to be here in the time frames identified in the RFP, and if they do not they would be called out on non-performance, as stated in the contract. The Committee recommended awarding a three (3) year contract with the option for two (2) one (1) year extensions to A.A. Duckett, Inc. as per the proposal submitted in response to RFP #16-0040PW, as recommended by staff. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hosfelt and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Recommendation of General Employee Pension Board - Consideration of a Retiree Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) Mr. Lester Blakeman, 209 Falmouth Way, advised members that he is a member of the Civilian Pension Board and a pensioner. Members were provided handouts by Mr. Blakeman, as follows: 1) Exhibit A - COLA History, and 2) Exhibit B1 - Breakdown of Monthly Pension Payments and B2 - Pension List 2008.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 29 Mr. Blakeman stated that the COLA History listed the cost of living increases that had been granted to retirees in the General Employee Pension Plan. He informed members that it had been 10 years since a COLA had been addressed, which he felt was a long time. Mr. Blakeman understood that there was nothing in the pension plan that guarantees a cost of living increase for these pensioners, and these employees knew this when they retired; however, he noted that in the past the City had acknowledged from time to time that retirees may need a little help surviving. He explained that Exhibit B1 listed pension checks written through January 15, 2008, when this matter was last reviewed. He noted that the individuals in the first column were making less than $1,000 per month. Mr. Blakeman stated that more than half the individuals in the second column were making less than $2,000 per month and the primary amount in the third column was approximately $2,000. He felt that the last three (3) individuals were doing okay. Mr. Blakeman indicated that he had previously suggested granting raises to sections of the pensioners and was told that this would not be allowed and an increase of any kind must be applied to all pensioners. He explained that he would be glad not to receive an increase if some of those on the lower end of the scale could be helped. Reiterating that a COLA had not been discussed for 10 years, Mr. Blakeman stated that this used to be an annual discussion. He requested that reviewing the need for or the ability to provide a COLA for pensioners in the General Employee Pension Plan be included on a future agenda. Mr. Blakeman advised that these were the people who built the City and gave hundreds or thousands of years of combined service to the City, and he felt it might be appropriate to give them some help from time to time. He stated that if this goes unnoticed year after year, nothing would happen and suggested it could be agreed to at least review this every year as part of the budget process. Mr. Blakeman indicated that he did not expect anything to happen this year, stating his understanding that the budget was set. He stated that if pension payments were $3,863,000, a 1% increase would cost $38,000, a 2% increase would cost $77,000, a 3% increase would cost $115,000, a 4% increase would cost $154,000, and a 5% increase would cost $193,000. Mr. Slavin questioned if Mr. Blakeman’s figures were calculated on a one (1) time annual basis. Responding, Mr. Blakeman stated that the figures that he provided were the cost for the year of the increase and would be the carry-forward amount until additional action was taken. He noted that the history provided showed that a variety of approaches had been taken in regard to increases. Mr. Blakeman thanked Mr. Anderson and others for getting him to the point to talk to members today, stating that this had been a long, uphill battle. In response to Mr. Neil, Mr. Blakeman stated that pensioners were also collecting Social Security. Mr. Blakeman stated that employees were told when they signed up for the plan that they should not count on the City’s contribution as their sole source of retirement income and the plan would be in conjunction with Social Security. He

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 30 estimated Social Security payment at approximately one-third of the amount that employees receive from their City pension, noting that COLAs from Social Security had been scarce. Mr. Neil stated that he would favor considering this in the future. Mr. Blakeman indicated that this was all he was asking, noting that pensioners feel like lost sheep because they are not being talked about but are set aside and ignored. He reiterated the desire to at least be considered. Mr. Shevock questioned the amounts that employees were making per month, for example, the individual who was receiving $200 per month and $2,400 per year. Responding, Mr. Blakeman indicated that $200 was probably a minimum pension amount. He stated that this employee could have been making $4,000 per year or less. Mr. Blakeman advised that the City’s defined benefit plan allowed employees to set their own pensions. He indicated that employees received 2% for every year they worked and the amount was based on their average salary during their last three (3) years. An employee who worked 10 years would receive 20% of their salary, an employee who worked 20 years would receive 40%, and an employee who worked 50 years would receive 100% of their salary. During the Council meeting, Mr. Slavin reminded members that no action was required by the Committee, explaining that this was an informational item and a request that may require some additional research on the part of Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer. Mr. Hare, Chairman of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee, stated that this was a request by Mr. Blakeman for future consideration of COLA’s for retirees. Mr. Lewis stated that this was previously discussed during the Council Committee of the Whole /Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting which is not televised and the public was unaware of what happened. Mr. Lewis asked how much this would cost the City and if the City has the funding. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that, to his knowledge there was no financial proposal submitted regarding this matter. He explained that there was a series of spreadsheets provided by Mr. Blakeman indicating the various pensions being received, excluding retiree names; however, there was no proposal to cost out. Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 Amending Chapter 22 - Building and Building Regulations; Chapter 26 - Businesses; Chapter 50 - Floods; Chapter 66 - Manufactured Homes and Trailers; Chapter 102 - Taxation; Chapter 106 - Traffic and Vehicles; Chapter 110 - Utilities; Appendix B - Zoning, Articles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 12; and Appendix F- Fees and Fines (Sponsors: Neil, Slavin, and Cole) Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, informed members that Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 had required a very comprehensive review and update to the Dover Code including any section referencing manufactured homes or mobile homes. She explained that the Mobile Home Park Zone would by changed to the Manufactured Home Zone, and it was

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 31 made clear that manufactured homes that meet that Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) standard are the type of homes that are allowed. Mrs. Townshend stated that this would ensure that nothing that does not meet those standards would be permitted in the City; however, language would be left to ensure that homes that already exist could still obtain licenses. In addition, where the current Code references mobile home parks, the terminology had been changed to land lease communities, and basic standards for maintenance and licensing of land lease communities had been developed. Mrs. Townshend explained that much of the language involved the zoning section of the Code, as well as the licensing section for manufactured homes. She noted that staff did a sweep of the entire Code and reviewed any section that referenced the terms manufactured home, mobile home, or trailer to make sure the text was consistent with current terminology. Councilman Neil read a prepared statement, as follows: Monday night, we heard Chief Carey mention the fire at the Grandview mobile home community that damaged or destroyed 3 houses. Several years ago before I was elected to this August body, Councilman Hare, then Councilman Perza and I toured several leased land communities, one of those was Grandview... which isn't grand at all. The potholes, contrary to State Law and the City code, were deep enough to serve as swimming pools for kids. I have sent each of you copies of the arbitrators decision in the Wild Meadows case in which the arbitrator said . . . “In all, I am left asking myself: If the City of Dover had not issued the Violation Letter, would the Landlord have ever fixed the community’s problems? The record before me indicates No . . . .” Wild Meadows is located on wetlands, the community owner was required to sign a topography map. Deep fissures or sinkholes were clustered around failing drains. Streets the City would build to last for 20 to 30 years, are going bad after 12. Today, I sent to you the Saga of the Gas Cut-off. The problem is, for the same services we provide, the values of homes drop, and we collect less tax money. The State of Delaware has laws that it can’t or does not enforce. The low income and limited income home owners are held at the mercy of the landlord because Leased Land communities are not “Free Enterprise” businesses. In the past, the Wild Meadows Home Owners Association had to request the City to make management cut down a tree branch that blocked a stop sign.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 32 While this ordinance can’t cure all of the ills in the leased land arena, this will mark the first in the State to hold community owners accountable for health and safety violations of the law, or face the loss of their license to operate. The Committee recommended adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2016-16. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hosfelt and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. (The First Reading of the ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting.) Mr. Anderson moved for acceptance of the Council Committee of the Whole Report. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sudler and unanimously carried. ABANDONMENT OF TOPAZ CIRCLE STUB STREET/WAIVING THE ABANDONMENT PROCEDURE During their Regular meeting of May 9, 2016, City Council approved the Council Committee of the Whole/Safety, Advisory, and Transportation Committee’s recommendation of looking into the process of abandoning the Topaz Circle stub street. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised that following the Planning Commission’s approval of The Arbors Senior Garden Apartments at 1051 College Road, members of City Council heard concerns from residents in Emerald Pointe and surrounding areas regarding the potential interconnection between The Arbors and the Emerald Pointe subdivision. Emerald Pointe was approved by the Planning Commission with two (2) stub streets, one (1) of which is at Topaz Circle and connects to property located 1051 College Road, which is currently known as The Arbors. This stub street has been improved as part of the infrastructure related to the Emerald Pointe subdivision. Mr. Koenig explained that at the Council Committee of the Whole/Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting of April 26, 2016, the Committee heard a presentation from the Planning Office about the substantial history related to The Arbors project and the interconnection between the subject site and Emerald Pointe. After that presentation, there was public testimony with regard to the interconnection. He indicated that the Committee unanimously approved a motion to look into the process of abandoning the stub street that was recommended by the Planning Commission in Emerald Pointe. This motion was ultimately approved by City Council through the acceptance of the Council Committee of the Whole/Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee report on May 9, 2016. Mr. Koenig stated that the City’s Charter provides City Council with the power and authority to vacate or abandon streets under Article II, Section 27. The Dover Code of Ordinances does not specify a process for street abandonment, but the City has consistently followed a process specified by the City Clerk’s Office. Mr. Koenig noted that this process is intended to begin with a request from an adjacent property owner. In this case, there was no such request; however, it is within the authority of City Council to initiate the process. Mr. Koenig indicated that proposals for abandonment of improved streets are referred to the Development Advisory Committee and the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission then makes a recommendation to the Utility

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 33 Committee. He explained that the Utility Committee makes a recommendation to City Council, who sets a public hearing and takes action following the public hearing. Mr. Koenig advised members that in the current situation, the abandonment would start with a motion by City Council to waive the normal process for street abandonment and to refer the matter to the Planning Commission. In order to move forward, City Council would need to: 1) waive the normal process for street abandonment, and 2) refer this matter to the Planning Commission for a public hearing on July 18, 2016. Responding, to Mr. Sudler, Mrs. Traci McDowell, City Clerk, indicated that the Council Committee of the Whole/Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee’s recommendation was to look into the process of abandoning the street. She stated that the normal process does not fit this situation. Mrs. McDowell clarified that the current recommendation, as explained by the City Manager, was to waive the normal process for abandonment, which is used when an adjacent property owner requests an abandonment, and move forward. She noted that several property owners in attendance at the April 26th meeting had expressed support for the abandonment. Mr. Sudler moved to waive the normal process for street abandonment. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cole and unanimously carried. Mr. Hosfelt moved to refer this matter to the Planning Commission for a public hearing on July 18, 2016. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. ELECTRIC RATES AND TARIFFS - TRANSMISSION VOLTAGE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CLASSIFICATION (“FT”) Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that on July 1, 2015, the current rates for all electric customers were implemented in accordance with the FY-2016 City of Dover budget authorization. The new electric rates resulted in an increase of approximately 3.4 percent for the Dover Air Force Base as a customer. He indicated that under a 1954 agreement, the City of Dover was to provide notice of a rate increase to Dover Air Force Base in advance of implementation. Mr. Koenig stated that current City management was not aware of the notice requirement in advance of implementation and, therefore, did not notify the Air Force of the proposed rate increase. The Air Force contacted the City of Dover in August 2015 regarding the rate increase. Mr. Koenig noted that the City issued a formal correspondence in November 2015 explaining the rate increase. Subsequent conversations over the past six (6) months had included a review of the rate model with Burns & McDonnell, who represents the City of Dover, as well as input from various consultant advocates working for the Air Force. He stated that after conducting a full rate review of all documents, the City of Dover and the Air Force mutually agreed on a final rate acceptable to both parties, and the rate of $0.06370/KWH adopted in July 2015 will be reduced to $0.0635/KWH. The proposed rate adjustment will reduce electric revenues from the Dover Air Force Base by approximately $9,500 to $18,000 per year, depending upon actual energy consumption at the facility. Staff recommended authorizing the City Manager to implement the Transmission Voltage Federal Government Classification (“FT”) Rate and Tariff. The effective date will be back dated to July 1, 2015 and all necessary billing adjustments will be implemented.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 34 Mr. Anderson questioned if this tariff classification would be exempt from a rate adjustment. Responding, Mr. Koenig explained that all rate classifications would be eligible for the Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) that would be considered later in the meeting by City Council. He indicated that this was the base rate for power for this customer class. Mr. Koenig stated that the PCA would be applied to the energy component. Mr. Neil moved to authorize the City Manager to implement the Transmission Voltage Federal Government Classification (“FT”) Rate and Tariff (Exhibit #2). The effective date will be back dated to July 1, 2015 and all necessary billing adjustments will be implemented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. APPOINTMENTS (REAPPOINTMENTS) RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR CHRISTIANSEN Mayor Christiansen requested the following reappointments to the Board of Adjustment for three (3) year terms to expire July 2019: K.C. Sheth, Chairman William Hufnal Mayor Christiansen requested the reappointment of Mrs. Kathleen Welsh to serve on the Planning Commission, representing the First District, for a three (3) tear term to expire June 1, 2019. Mr. Lewis had requested that this item be removed from the Consent Agenda; however, he withdrew his request since the Mayor was not present to answer his questions. He noting that this was nothing personal against the candidate. Mr. Sudler stated that since members would be voting on the matter, he would like to hear Mr. Lewis’ questions, even though the Mayor was not present to answer them. Responding, Mr. Lewis thought that it would be unfair with the Mayor not being present. Mr. Sudler moved to defer the appointments (reappointments) recommended by Mayor Christiansen until the Mayor is present to answer questions. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis and unanimously carried. FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-16 AMENDING CHAPTER 22 - BUILDING AND BUILDING REGULATIONS; CHAPTER 26 - BUSINESSES; CHAPTER 50 - FLOODS; CHAPTER 66 - MANUFACTURED HOMES AND TRAILERS; CHAPTER 102 - TAXATION; CHAPTER 106 - TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES; CHAPTER 110 - UTILITIES; APPENDIX B - ZONING, ARTICLES 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 12; AND APPENDIX F - FEES AND FINES Council President Slavin reminded the public that copies of the proposed ordinance were available at the entrance of the Council Chambers, on the City’s website at www.cityofdover.com under “Government,” or by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at 736-7008 or cityclerk@dover.de.us. Since the ordinance amends the Zoning Code, a public hearing is required. Staff recommended

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 35 referral of the amendments to the Planning Commission on July 18, 2016 and that a public hearing take place during the Council Meeting of August 8, 2016, at 7:30 p.m., at which time, final action by Council will take place. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that the proposed ordinance was a compilation of changes to address concerns of Council and staff and would update the standards and terminology throughout the Dover Code as they relate to manufactured homes. He stated that the proposed ordinance would also implement standards for management and maintenance of land lease communities. Mr. Koenig noted that the proposed ordinance was sponsored by Councilmen Neil, Slavin, and Cole. Mr. Hare moved to refer the amendments and set a public hearing before City Council for August 8, 2016 at 7:30 p.m., as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the Zoning Ordinance Amendments as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-16 AMENDING CHAPTER 22 - BUILDING AND BUILDING REGULATIONS; CHAPTER 26 - BUSINESSES; CHAPTER 50 - FLOODS; CHAPTER 66 - MANUFACTURED HOMES AND TRAILERS; CHAPTER 102 - TAXATION; CHAPTER 106 - TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES; CHAPTER 110 - UTILITIES; APPENDIX B - ZONING, ARTICLES 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 12; AND APPENDIX F - FEES AND FINES (Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee) FINAL READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-17 - 2016/2017 CITY OF DOVER BUDGET ORDINANCES The First Reading of the proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Regular Council Meeting of June 13, 2016. Council President Slavin reminded members of the public that copies of the proposed ordinance were available at the entrance of the Council Chambers, and on the City’s website at www.cityofdover.com under “Government.” Mr. Hare moved that the Final Reading of the Proposed Ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, stated that Proposed Ordinance #2016-17 was the compilation of documents and the discussions that occurred during the Special Council Meeting - Budget Review of May 24, 25, and 26, 2016 which encompassed approximately 10 hours of introduction and debate with respect to all components of the City budget. He stated that the 28-page ordinance boiled down approximately 315 pages of information related to the City’s General Fund, Electric Fund, and Water/Wastewater Fund, as well as a number of ancillary funds that the City manages. Mr. Koenig advised that the aggregated budget for the City’s General Fund, Electric Fund, and Water/Wastewater Fund is approximately $156,144,700, with total revenues and expenses of $137,119,300 estimated for FY 17. He stated that it was important to note that the FY 17 City of Dover budget contains no property tax or fee increases related to the General Fund, no water or sewer rate or fee increases related to the water and sewer utility, and no rate increase related to the

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 36 electric utility. Mr. Koenig reminded members that during the budget discussions, Council had voted in favor of an alternate budget design, which included an approximate 2% Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) on the energy portion of the electric bill. He noted that the final staff count went from 359 full-time employees in FY 16 to 357 full-time employees in the proposed FY 17 budget. Mr. Koenig stated that the recommendation, based on the budget deliberation, reduced full-time equivalents to 354 employees because there was a motion to dissolve the Economic Development Office through the FY 17 budget and direct the City Manager to incur the necessary expenses to dissolve that Office. He reiterated that the Final Reading of the budget ordinance is a 28-page document that spells out estimated and projected spending for the City of Dover in all funds, including capital projects, for FY 17. Mr. Slavin stated that the Second Reading and possible adoption of the budget this evening was the result of 15 hours of public hearings, hundreds of hours of preparation from staff, and research and study done by staff and by other Council members. He advised that this was the ninth City budget that he had been involved in. Mr. Slavin indicated that if he had been told when he returned to Council three (3) years ago that the budget presented in 2016 would have no tax, fee, or utility increases, he would have stated the need for everyone work very hard to get there, and that everyone had worked very hard and gotten there. He acknowledged that the budget may not have everything that everyone wants, but it has enough that the budget would do well for the City and the constituents. Not only did the proposed budget have no tax increase, it actually would lower property taxes on owners of property in the Business Improvement District (BID). As such, according to Mr. Slavin’s memory and research, this was the first budget in more than 20 years for the City of Dover that would actually lower taxes. He stated his respect for the right of any Council member to raise motions on the floor at this time; however, he cautioned that adopting things at the 59th minute of the 23rd hour of deliberations without time to properly vet and study the proposed changes would shift risk onto the City. Mr. Slavin noted that it may not be known what proposed cuts or additions would do to the delicate budget that was put together over those many hours. Mr. Anderson stated that he had a simple motion to put forward meant to clarify what was done by Council during the series of motions that were voted on during the Special Council meeting - Budget Review, relating to the economic development. He reminded members that money had been moved to the Mayor’s Office and the Mayor was given discretion to use it; however, an earlier motion eliminated all staff members of the Economic Development Office. Mr. Anderson wished to clarify that the Mayor would have discretion to keep the one (1) person from the Economic Development Office who does the administrative work. Mr. Anderson felt that the Mayor and the DDP would otherwise be handicapped, stating that the DDP was quite concerned about not having anyone to do administration before they have time to hire staff. He commented that some, but not all, work could be done by volunteers. Mr. Anderson moved to allow the Mayor to utilize a portion of the $65,000 for economic development for an administrative staffer and be allowed to share the said staffer with the Downtown Dover Partnership with funds paid for said staffing from the DDP returning to the Mayor’s economic development budget. The motion failed for lack of a second. Responding to Mr. Hutchison regarding the actions taken by Council pertaining to funds to be directed to the DDP, Mr. Koenig explained that there had been a series of motions by Council. He

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 37 stated that there had been a recommendation for an economic development committee and a recommendation to increase the funding to the DDP from $70,000 in the draft budget to a total of $150,000. The $150,000 was intended to be used at the discretion of the DDP to address their staffing needs for FY 17 and could be used for one (1) or more persons. Mr. Koenig stated that the DDP was currently advertising for an Executive Director and was hoping to fill this position by early September. He indicated that a subsequent motion by Council related to setting the Business Improvement District (BID) tax. Mr. Koenig explained that the proposed rate brought before Council would have raised approximately $48,800; however, Council set the FY 17 rate at zero. The taxing district boundaries and legal requirements of the district would be kept in place in the Code, but no additional BID tax would be collected from property owners in the BID for FY 17, provided Council adopts the budget. Mr. Koenig stated that Council’s last motion had to do with the funds remaining after the City Manager incurs the necessary expenses to close the Economic Development Office. If all necessary payments were made from the proposed budget, which was approximately $238,000 to his recollection, a sum of money would be left over in FY 17. Council had authorized those remaining funds to be directed to the Mayor’s budget. Mr. Koenig advised that he and Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, had not yet directed those funds to a specific line item but would inform Council of this once the funds are transferred. He indicated that these were the FY 17 operating budget recommendations that came out of the budget hearings and deliberation, and it was his understanding that this would not carry forward into FY 18. In response to Mr. Lewis regarding various programs that could possibly be cut in relation to the State budget, Mr. Koenig stated that the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) budget included Municipal Street Aid and Community Transportation Funds at the same levels as FY 16. Late last week, there was an email regarding Community Transportation Funds that indicated that each legislator’s allotment would increase by $15,000. Mr. Koenig indicated that this would be an increase to $240,000 or $265,000, noting that he was unsure of the actual funding authorization that DelDOT was able to secure for those types of services. He stated that, to his knowledge, the police pension payment would stay at the same rate as FY 16. As part of the FY 16 budget discussions at the State level, a possibility of changing the appropriation for realty transfer taxes was mentioned. Mr. Koenig explained that this 3 percent tax is currently split 50/50 between the municipality or county and the State. Mr. Koenig noted that the proposal last year was to alter that split to allocate 2 percent to the State and 1 percent to the local government. This proposal did not go through as part of the FY 16 State budget, and Mr. Koenig’s understanding was that alteration of the real estate transfer tax appropriation was not being debated at the State budget level this year. Mr. Koenig believed that there were minor changes regarding law enforcement funds related to 911 cellular reimbursements; however, there was no indication at this point that there would be any adjustments to State revenues. He advised that Ms. Cheryl Bundek, Tax Assessor, met with the Secretary of Finance regarding a Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) of approximately $280,000 per year, and the expectation was that funding for PILOT would remain at the same level as FY 16. Mr. Koenig indicated that, at this late hour, he believed that State revenues in FY 17 would be roughly equal to those in FY 16. Responding to Mr. Lewis regarding his opinion as to whether the City was safe, Mr. Koenig stated that he was reasonably confident that the City was in fair shape, noting that he does not control anything that happens at Legislative Hall.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 38 Mr. Hare felt that the DDP had been given sufficient funding to hire an administrative person if they wished to continue that position, stating that this had been the purpose for giving the funds. Mr. Hare moved for adoption of Ordinance #2016-17 as presented (Exhibit #3), seconded by Mr. Hosfelt. The motion carried by a roll call vote of eight (8) yes (Sudler, Neil, Lewis, Cole, Hosfelt, Hare, Hutchison, and Slavin) and one (1) no (Anderson). CITY MANAGER’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, thanked Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, and her staff for their patience and diligence in helping to prepare the FY 17 budget. He noted that a lot of effort and discussion went into it. Mr. Koenig also thanked the department heads who all contributed significantly related to their budget, noting that they all appreciate the opportunity to come in and argue for their staff, programs, and capital projects. He expressed thanks to everyone who had participated in the budget discussion, including members of Council, stating his appreciation for the comments and encouragement. He stated the expectation of providing excellent service and projects for the citizens and rate payers. Mr. Koenig stated that staff was very proud of the document endorsed tonight and was looking forward to the FY 17 budget implementation. COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Slavin extended early wishes for a happy birthday to Mr. Hare, whose birthday is July 6th. Mr. Hosfelt noted that the City had increased in size last week by 90,000 people, noting that the Firefly Music Festival had come and gone successfully, in large part due to the City’s workforce. He felt that those involved were incredible people, including the Fire Marshal’s Office; Police Department; Fire Department; Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager; the Public Works Department; and Ms. Kay Sass, Public Affairs/Emergency Management Coordinator. Mr. Hosfelt stated that they did a great job and that everyone should be very proud of City employees, noting that actions that were taken to bring portions of the Dover International Speedway into the City had paid off. Speaking for the Dover International Speedway, Mr. Hosfelt expressed appreciation for everyone’s efforts. Mr. Sudler informed members that on July 16, 2016 at 12:00 p.m., there would be a Fourth District Annual Empowerment Fair sponsored by Mr. Sudler and held in partnership with the Cen-Del Foundation. He indicated that the theme is to empower the youth and citizens of Dover with resources that will not only enhance the quality of life in their communities but encourage citizens to be held accountable for being law-abiding citizens that other cities can model after. Mr. Sudler invited all members of Council and residents of their districts to join in, noting that there would be vendors advocating job opportunities, anti-illegal gang strategies, voter registration, and pardon procedures for at-risk youth offenders. He noted that the location of the event is Mishoe Park Place, 320 Raymond Street, Dover, which is off State College Road. Mr. Sudler reiterated that the start time of the event was 12:00 p.m. with no set end time. Mr. Hare advised that on June 21, 2016, he and Mr. Lewis held a community meeting for the Second District. Mayor Christiansen; Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development; and Officer Krista Roosa from the Dover Police Department were present. He indicated that there was a nice turnout and participants expressed concerns that Mr. Hare emailed to Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, to address. He advised that one (1) of the biggest issues was

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 39 speeding on Wyoming Avenue and Westview Terrace. A few code violations were mentioned, as well as other issues that the City must discuss with the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC). Mr. Hare noted that the event was held at Capitol Baptist Church, which did a very nice job and provided good food. He felt it was a very good meeting. Mr. Hutchison noted that there had been a well-written newspaper article about Dover Air Force Base being considered for an air refueling mission. He felt sure that the City of Dover, along with the Chamber of Commerce, Kent County Levy Court, and the State of Delaware would reach out to embrace that opportunity when the time frame is closer. On behalf of Council, Mr. Slavin extended get well soon wishes to Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, who suffered a minor injury and was resting comfortably at home. Mr. Hare moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All ordinances, resolutions, motions, and orders adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of June 27, 2016, are hereby approved. ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /TM S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Council-Minutes\2016\06-27-2016.wpd Exhibits Exhibit #1 - Map depicting parcels with structures built in 1978 or earlier Exhibit #2 - Transmission Voltage Federal Government Classification ("FT") Rate and Tariff Exhibit #3 - Ordinance #2016-17 - 2016/2017 City of Dover Budget Ordinances

EXHIBIT #1 Parcels with Structures Wilmington College City Council Meeting of 06/27/2016 Built in 1978 or Earlier E Campus D r r D e h c iat Tec Dr so re As wa Dela p us D r lers Wa C am Todd y W Dr Ca m p u s D r ha se C ar ed Del Tech C Cedar Dover Mall Chase Apartments lvd B Rd W Ln K Scarborou ic C us ra t R w gh fo rd C ar r Ln Stonebrook ol e e lA Ln Tr an East ve us on Ho ll d tic m Ct im e rs r R Jonathan D W P G Wild Meadows Mol Dr rin Dr l y Ct ek ng l e di ee m Mic Sut Pri Stonebrook Rd cr Wh We to n le D s Mill West Ka ey lc h ro s r en h el r nn Kur Dr Ci Dr De rell r Dr eD on Far W Millcreek e Dr r Pl t Dr m m is D r l Ct h Lin si inn el G Finis Persimmon Pe r McG Ve r n Dr ri s re y Ct tm Park ill Old ly n Aud r re P Dr Place rD ave o Car Dr We ic R Mo o Dover Downs M au an P n do ip s Go r Sus McKee Le ree l n Pl Road Gor d Bet l Mc Business Park Ke e don hP l Rd Pl Pl a za Dr Ap Maple Glen ns ri l D elaware Do Dr St w Ct Delaware at e e U Farthing or State er bb n ni Do Woods Ho M Se ve v o ap s ki University rs ity d yh le ic R e Seskinore North Dover rs en Ct Gl Shopping i ps Dr Rd Center Le Ln Ni bl ic le ge la ol k Ct rk C ow r d Garrison eD Ol ea in Tract M yw ou d a nd rn M Br in g Do Oak Shadows ve Meadows Ln at Dover Dr Pu Somerset rp le ow Park M ar tin Me W Ct ad ay ay Fai r w N t R d Du Ve a W yC a or St ilm po g d W r G re on ita nt Ct m R ay J as Hw li p Phil ay o n R Ct College St y Whit s h Fox Road Business Towne Point em ar Apartments Meadows Park University el Bl v d C Co nw Courtyard Silver Mill Ba ol lS Apartments co ne le t Ln n st o ge Ct St m d lv Av a te Ge Pa R d e ge w atha Retreat ic B Hw r Ba k D o lle co y 1 Emerald r C ffe r n R d Hi a er ak Pointe Je Dr on ite o Terry Cir d ho W Wh in R r Mi Sc ay W er D lle or e Rd l es st p e r r y Le na vd lle P tm Dr a p Medi al Dr Silver Lake Bl Va p Townhouses Silver Lake ck Towne Point N E n e O To p Overlook so en Dr im W Pi Tr oo ck d itz in Bu h Ct az ns An d Ov erlo ok Pl ch Ct n Bu R ar nock or Dr r d Ci n To Ln Rd w Portm Me Westminster Dr Dr r s lD rio gg ve t t eC r Bay Tree Bo n ni d Ca Dr Rd za Rd Ta n k R Baltray l a t el e O ow hi t W y stw Woodcrest a ltra Aug us ta ick cD W O ld W oolh h M d eR Ct C Dr in Fox Hall n Cha am re Vondaway Sch B Pi d D r Pr t l fie yT Ct e Hidden O Ct ar rd Ba N Ct ak a M bo Ho Oaks e Ln G Br ar Wils ous D A St d yl r en ad l ac od ak Re d N e ar Towne Point rt h Wo d ey on D Oa Ln G Ea ur Ct kD st Apartments Ei s Rd Ln Ct t Creek Al o dy Dr n cres St eve pl r Av vd t eld r h rip ne D es Ma en St C For e Dr nz ynn es rfi Silver La ke B l es n oD t Dr Dr Dr ow Ke y M a le nea Patriot Part ui ick L gl k e D so ed La ew er r G le l tu ilv er vi Fr e n Manchester Village Patr Tea Ba ke r Rd S r r ar D r Square e C sro ont D Ct Qu rD An East La t t lC Oakm ion ail ylo Dr Mer n Dr t sC Lo ne Ho Ta R d Ro Do re An Oakmont ow G llo e Lake n k ve so t r noustie Rd st T ad w Av c Trl Oa in park d rP r rri Sa Me White eD B lv Gardens White te kfo ar en Dr ttn Ha hi k Car ard Oak Farms d rg S t Bu es Lake Club Oak rd Blv Aco Ln wn tT rs Apartments W Fo B ro Vi urn Oakridge ov Apartments a ry rg er P r Farms Xi t io n Me dc ern ng rn L olu d Ol The Hamlet in ia l W oo o side R ev kA ve Lak e oc anc n Be ood Cir Northwest Carol Street s St NG SH Ironw Ros Mapleton Ave llr e iv e Ct Dover Ave al C Ln en pki ns Development w N St mori Lake k C Square Independence Oa te Ho e Heights r Villag view Turnbe Tho H it r t me te a te S Rd ra Village Fair c hing P D over ood N rry Turnberry o st D r y n Nixo ol Caro enue Rd Dr sr W nto t e Rd rC rov Dr n Av S Turnbe u ker ir tG B alt Wal Pl illi e Ave m rry n Ln ge Dr Cly erica rita St u Sp stn Dr Liberty l St sR io t o Ct e Ch He a N Am e ru a Av d Court mb i g Lon nc Capital NW Colu St Mi N Br Ke n Wi Sc Village Ext ison tsc eR Mah Mad est S Westfield t on Poi ng at McKee Healthcare d in Rd ed oga rR rd S Lex Fo Branch Rd N Dr o he Gir l ny P hola s d ney Aca tR nt R a d fo Ha Bice d t Rod Nic N Edgehill l Ct Wi d t gton Shi rm ng Gr lse en C t ut L h Governors am S Pl Ha o n y ed erg As n ne Fo Arlb t Dr tc o a Willi B Lind cia Cir Square n Ar St ve yR Sc o co ot ee nial Wh a r g to n Ct t Pea ck Apartments dA r hin nc B bo l d Pl Rd Was F ox Rd Bu hil nten t la n Acorn Farms t Bla ee Dr i Free St e n Up rn Lexington Av Sw Ave dom Matt Ha io ng Mo n Patr m ze Rd Ln wi lv d wy Glen ltin D gu Tr e r Le k Edgehill rn D eR d sM d us Haz el R ill D r eP eR rty D r t Dr pl erho Dr tie Libe n Dr lvd Ma a St d rno ra tio ve Clar nd A N Go Decla la Ca Bicentennial r Mar y Village I g N L ittle Creek Rd W o Ed vern Four Seasons d o t R em ill r Me nS ll D v Ha nsyl ve H s io x g r ta Fo ve etin rs A iv i ob rL Fox Hall West g hte n mpli Ma nt A Pen La y St ED N y NQ English y sbur Bicentennial Mar Wa se Village t a Ex N Am t r Dr hou E i g er C Clar Saul D N Ne b Dr d ueen ey Pe Village III yR St on bl Dr nt al ania a ls e ta i l ve Ha r r ow Ave B a ll w St SE b e Ln H e an A Pe St ware Ave tin S lu ow kL n eV Rd Dela a y Dr Cold dg l e ri c C a ld on co al lle olon c wi ey Map eh Va C C tS llo Pl Ct il S t Sw Cec ble t ll C Ta y ill l Bicentennial s Hw g Sprin le L n a Fox Hall Te King e we Stone Av N Ki Heatherfield Village II P au Edgehill yD t West Gr e Pew Shopping r rk w l R ev e r e Addition Pl en Bro o t N Ca r Blade D r on S Center Par k D ter C ood Fult n Pl Pe n Clearview on Mallard Pond k Pl Ke gel eric nt Ct t Ave d t o lin wC St lR Meadow Se w R id S Am an C odro r hil ir Independence Blvd ht Ct l Wo D wig en St Che Country Club eP re Cir Green w lsea yS G an Pil ot Wa y v an A Tu c e t Cir Apartments Presidential t rm k Heatherfield Brandywine Ln ke oc Ro u ndtree Dr Greenway Carver Rd Fa Courts Lo e Dr lm East Apartments y Sq n nB a Ct out Dr ison E n St Hampton Mad Pl ton Bu un hW Cranberry visio w ay Square Greentree Dr Andrew Dr do r i Cranberry Ru a Wes Sh Way WD Par Haven D H a mp H ton D r ne Ln rd n B Run ed S t hn ll E Re ya Ct rson Dr Jeffe Jo Lady Bug Dr Heatherfield S Ki Ba lv d Ya Ct n Afton r o wn Rd Cir tree rm h ed S t Babb Dr Mars ou Marsh id Dover per W Re is rk w o Creek e e Leg Av ate S th Way ts ms C t ow Regent St Coo Crossing Dover k Ln Ada Cour Ave JH Br S St Cree Forrest untry t lativ East Mobile od S Country Dr C Stoney Creek June Ln Gibbs Dr Fores Dr Home Park Un e Av t St za Bennington St n P la W ay o Barrister St t Aly St d Ingram St M o ri a Pine Minor k er ma ite Place Looc e Bertrand Dr Grove Farms dN Dr y Signal St Wa Barrister Pl South gJ r Blv M er es Mo rty St Lincoln St Ra St e r Kin Country Village m rm an Luth Court St Martin Luther King Jr Blvd l n t h v ocke rt h S Mar tin Apartments Ho arc W Lo E No ad A Cherry S t S Little Creek Rd ilro Dover High N Farmview Dr m S Qu S lvd sale School Gateway West Paul St Jr B Jeru Jawd Dr e g Shopping Gre K in een S Ne r Fawn St uthe The en e nS t Av Lincoln tin L S Sauls S Farmview Dr r ti Tudor St Center a r Davis Cir M Eas St Park Way w St Ma Ir m a Kent A Clare r St ve Industrial ghte t Hay d tS se S Slau rR t Woo dmill Dr es wg lle C Park s le bury R t nce S Mi vy Mini Ree Co vd Ha C ir Le Sim o gate Tr Bl Maggies W Mar A Woodmill Capital Green ill n ay af k Ln tgun ma S t al d Ban te r St St rt He Kerb E Wa ou Ot Apartments tle A Cir g e C ir n Sho ar u Bl D ve Dr Enterprise t Sussex Ln is in R Ave L on Ct Cr be r Ban Simon Circle Dr Business Park d D Dr ly Cas g I slan aw f Ro MC ow ning er El m Te r or rt a W o rch e s t St ater S t New o rt h Blue Hen ve Av e WN St WW llins Dr dA Commerc e Way Co Apartments Pa r Ch Village of lv d Ct R rB est st a ee rne rri Westover lin is e Blue Hen ad Fai iff Be Schoolview H or SW Tr ib ng M Rive Corporate tt Dr W B Pl ay t r Rd bi ad s Cr o d nW th S s ep ro n if fli Sou Center Ke a St ta i to M St Ct t ng r ond D Enterpris e AS rs f Pl ni ss Te s ne y Lo Scull r en r nd P ll Rd tla E rt h hoo l Bay Ma Sh No r ry Sc n Dr d w W D Pl ss E leme nta Court e He el es S Governors Ave H oly Cro do s ra t ov m e Rd B lu Cannon Mill n er a yss Kent Plaza ke Dr Dr Th Wem Ln r e rry General Ci G r eenb S Hospital S State St W yR m Ja t re S Bulld Ba es Sh Mo o Ruth Ct Hope St el d Ann Je f e La d ke fre St in Av ur rack og Dr y b ra Ct Rd a Pu Way Sack n el Ci lle ill e lvd y r ui tv ely B t Hw Dr lic Q et Ridg fe Stover azl Sa H Dover St pon ty t General Foods Eden Hill W ic S nn shir e Ct S Du Bl k Ca r Ct D er by Farm The Beeches vd L este on M t Tr a ill C d ns Dr Ln oo Gooden Ave Department of po al e rb rw S t De e Pine Transportation r ta nd Sh t io xo Sa Ln ysh Morris Estate ir gh a t nC Sunset Ter Paradee Elec Monroe Ter k Westview Ter S Bradford St ir e Waples Ave ittin o ro m Wyo Center Br b Ave ill e t Av us S ve Dr Ave Lot Sig ri c A G ak Park m Ln ch rgre n R d in g en sit Janeka Ln e al ns Sh an Dr uv M il Ko R Tr Shank Rd e Eve op L a ff B lR Woodford Dr ris Dr d d Mor Morris e r ty Nottingham Meadows Estates 2 Av e Ln Sherwood 2 d r O rc ha Ev Starlifter A e rg r ee Wyoming Ave n Riverside Schutte Park Sherwood Ci r ve Mobile Dr Wo Home Park o ds Roosevelt Ave Cha edge Rd Jef ferson Ter rle River Chase Dr s Woo Carrolls Corner dburn C ir Woodbrook Shopping Yearsley Dr River Capital Park Center Chase G al ax y Dr Holly Dr Westwood Dr Dr Apartments M a llard Rd n Hidden Creek rto ector Bu Oak Dr St Crescent Dr eon R un Conn w ew ar P unch n e Ba La tC Riverside Rd Ne sel t Lynnhaven r n nD sto Ly n n ha v e ng s ing in e Crickle Creek Ln Ki Cr d C lif Liv e k B e nd R y Ct Wa fM e Rd eH ler rl C obil Sh s ad Ct an w Ca ow Ba o me Ev Fo d Blue Beach Dr k Sir eR na P ar s tl t l St Kings C a Crossgates May s Ln Cliff Mobile r Home Park dle De d Fid at J anes R nt e sD Wi Legend D ogwood Ave Do gw oo d rb e rry sG rn r Ct Dr Alder Rd sC Homes Built 1978 or Earlier Clearfield Ja ne ir Apartments Ave Kesselring Condos rd Ave Dover Air Mockingbi Ln n ic k Force Ru d Post Blvd Mayfair Old Base Turner Dr Residential Mimosa Ave Haman Dr Pine Grove Garton Ln Mayber ry Ln Apartments Residential (Exempt) We Wedgewood b bs Ln City Parcels Kent Acres Water Bodies Rodney ¯ Village 1 inch = 680 feet Date Printed: June 3, 2016 File: m:\gis_data\projects\tech_mxds \year_1978_or_earlier_construction_42x54 Department: Public Works GIS City of Dover, Delaware

EXHIBIT #2 City Council Meeting of TRANSMISSION VOLTAGE FEDERAL GOVERMENT CLASSIFICATION 06/27/2016 “FT” AVAILABILITY This rate is available by special contract throughout the City of Dover electric service area for Federal Government customers located where Dover's existing facilities are adequate to supply the character of service as specified below. CHARACTER OF SERVICE The electric power delivered hereunder shall be three phase, 60 cycle, alternating current at a nominal potential of sixty-nine thousand (69,000) volts. Demand, energy and power factor will be metered at the point of delivery of service. All transformation, circuiting and protective apparatus beyond the point of delivery shall be installed, owned and maintained by the customer. Service shall be supplied and metered at 69,000 volts, and the customer is required to own and maintain all transforming, switching and protective equipment. Demand Charge All KW - per KW 10.50 Energy Charge All KWH, per KWH 0.0635 DETERMINATION OF DEMAND The measured demand shall be the average of the four (4) greatest sixty (60) minute demands measured on separate days of each month. In any month in which the average power factor at the delivery point is greater or less than ninety-eight and one half percent (98.5%), the measured demand shall be corrected in accordance with the following formula: Billing Demand = Measured demand x . 985 Average Power Factor The City measures both leading and lagging power factor, treating both as non-unity power factors and the customers are billed accordingly. MINIMUM MONTHLY BILL The minimum monthly charge shall be seventy-five percent (75%) of the greatest Billing Demand during the preceding 11 months and energy equal to three hundred (300) hours' use of that demand. PURCHASE POWER ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Power Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2015

EXHIBIT #3 City Council Meeting of 06/27/2016 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2016-17 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Forty Six Million Seven Hundred Seventeen Thousand Four Hundred dollars ($46,717,400) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: GENERAL FUND CASH RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR 2016-2017 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 4,820,400 $ 4,493,900 RECEIPTS FINES AND POLICE REVENUE 651,400 763,300 INVESTMENT INCOME 140,000 90,000 LIBRARY REVENUES 67,000 70,300 KENT COUNTY BOOK REIMBURSEMENT 312,600 312,600 BUSINESS LICENSES 1,472,000 1,467,000 PERMITS AND OTHER FEES 1,436,300 1,662,100 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 56,600 56,800 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 461,500 525,000 PROPERTY TAXES 12,783,800 12,895,100 BID REVENUE 49,700 - RECREATION REVENUE 149,000 150,000 FRANCHISE FEE 682,300 680,000 SANITATION FEES 2,530,000 2,538,300 RENT REVENUE - GARRISON FARM 93,900 94,500 COURT OF CHANCERY FEES 1,090,400 1,100,000 RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 21,976,500 22,405,000 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS W/WW 1,420,200 1,653,800 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS ELECTRIC 3,586,700 3,564,900 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 5,006,900 5,218,700 GRANTS: POLICE RELATED/EXTRA DUTY 172,700 258,600 POLICE PENSION GRANT 500,000 500,000 GREEN ENERGY GRANT 98,500 98,500 MISC GRANT REVENUE 25,000 25,000 VERIZON RESERVE 50,000 - GRANTS SUBTOTAL 846,200 882,100 TRANSFERS FROM: TRANSFER TAX 2,090,200 1,672,700 MUNICIPAL STREET AID 673,100 673,100 CIVIL TRAFFIC PENALTIES 480,000 496,900 WATER/WASTEWATER 850,000 875,000 ELECTRIC 10,000,000 10,000,000 OTHER RESERVES 13,200 - TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL 14,106,500 13,717,700 TOTAL REVENUES 41,936,100 42,223,500 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE & REVENUE $ 46,756,500 $ 46,717,400 1

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES GENERAL FUND - EXPENDITURES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2016-2017 2015/16 2016/17 DEPARTMENT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET CITY CLERK $ 382,800 $ 412,300 COUNCIL 113,600 141,100 TAX ASSESSOR 239,800 244,000 FIRE 735,400 721,700 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 1,133,000 1,201,300 LIBRARY 1,456,000 1,635,000 RECREATION 723,200 750,900 LIFE SAFETY 479,800 485,200 CODE ENFORCEMENT 412,700 421,100 PLANNING 532,800 546,800 INSPECTIONS 749,000 697,900 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 245,000 - POLICE 15,921,400 16,091,600 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 634,200 783,600 STREETS 658,500 1,163,500 SANITATION 2,151,100 2,032,800 CITY MANAGER 909,300 792,400 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 625,500 716,300 FINANCE 991,400 1,011,100 PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION 580,300 680,000 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 692,200 607,100 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 173,400 207,000 PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY 569,300 585,100 FLEET MAINTENANCE 760,000 776,300 CUSTOMER SERVICE 1,082,000 1,143,800 HUMAN RESOURCES 376,700 392,500 MAYOR 76,100 74,000 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTALS 33,404,500 34,314,400 OTHER EXPENSES DEBT SERVICE 669,400 685,300 CONTRIBUTION TO DDP 70,000 150,000 MISCELLANEOUS GRANT RELATED EXP 25,000 25,000 INSURANCE 690,000 700,000 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 1,567,700 2,039,700 OTHER EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES 51,500 400,700 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 10,600 15,000 UNCOLLECTIBLES - TRASH AND OTHER 50,000 50,000 STREET LIGHTS 797,700 804,000 NEW STREET PROPERTIES ACQUISITIONS 240,400 - OTHER EXPENSE SUBTOTAL 4,172,300 4,869,700 TRANSFERS TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND - PROJECTS 2,625,400 1,859,400 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 229,600 - APPROP. TO THE GENERAL EMPLOYEE PENSION FUND 594,300 - APPROP. TO THE POLICE PENSION FUND 676,500 670,000 APPROP. POLICE PENSION - STATE GRANT 500,000 500,000 TRANSFER TO VERIZON RESERVE 50,000 - TRANSFER TO INVENTORY WRITE-OFFS 10,000 10,000 TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL 4,685,800 3,039,400 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 42,262,600 42,223,500 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 4,493,900 4,493,900 TOTALS $ 46,756,500 $ 46,717,400 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 2

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Million Four Hundred Thirty Three Thousand Three Hundred dollars ($2,433,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: REVENUES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - PROJECTS $ 2,926,700 $ 383,900 REVENUES INCOME FROM SALE OF ASSETS 120,800 - GRANT RECEIPTS 80,500 105,000 INTEREST EARNINGS 5,000 5,000 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 2,625,400 1,859,400 MISCELLANOUS RECEIPTS 74,700 - TRANSFER FROM PARKLAND RESERVE - 80,000 SUBTOTAL PROJECT RECEIPTS 2,906,400 2,049,400 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 2,906,400 2,049,400 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE AND REVENUES $ 5,833,100 $ 2,433,300 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 EXPENDITURES REVISED BUDGET FIRE $ 445,800 $ 145,700 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 185,200 58,200 LIFE SAFETY 55,700 29,500 POLICE 302,700 299,800 RECREATION 73,900 165,000 STREETS 3,735,000 1,026,000 SANITATION 449,000 261,500 CITY MANAGER 24,700 - FACILITIES MANAGEMENT - 27,700 FLEET MAINTENANCE 84,500 31,000 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTAL 5,356,500 2,044,400 TRANSFERS TRANSFER TO CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 92,700 - TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL 92,700 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,449,200 2,044,400 BUDGET BALANCE 383,900 388,900 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCE & EXPENDITURES $ 5,833,100 $ 2,433,300 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 3

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Forty One Thousand dollars ($741,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 720,300 $ 731,000 INTEREST EARNED 10,700 10,000 TOTALS $ 731,000 $ 741,000 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 731,000 741,000 TOTALS $ 731,000 $ 741,000 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 4

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES GENERAL CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Two Hundred Sixty Six Thousand Three Hundred dollars ($1,266,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 915,100 $ 1,251,300 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS 13,900 15,000 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL CAPITAL ASSET FUND 92,700 - TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 229,600 - TOTAL RECEIPTS 336,200 15,000 TOTALS $ 1,251,300 $ 1,266,300 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR $ 1,251,300 $ 1,266,300 TOTALS $ 1,251,300 $ 1,266,300 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 5

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES PARKLAND/RECREATION RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Twenty Seven Thousand Nine Hundred dollars ($327,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: OPERATING REVENUES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 320,800 $ 324,900 INTEREST INCOME 4,100 3,000 TOTALS $ 324,900 $ 327,900 OPERATING EXPENSES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUND - 80,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 324,900 247,900 TOTALS $ 324,900 $ 327,900 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 6

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES WATER/WASTEWATER FUND REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Sixteen Million Six Hundred Ninety Six Thousand Nine Hundred dollars ($16,696,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 1,072,900 $ 566,500 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 206,900 663,200 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,279,800 1,229,700 BASE REVENUE WATER SERVICES 5,366,600 5,800,000 WASTEWATER SERVICES 3,823,800 3,800,000 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICES 2,997,600 3,000,000 GROUNDWATER INFLOW ADJUSTMENT 1,965,600 1,938,000 WATER TANK SPACE LEASING 341,900 366,200 SEWER IMPACT FEES 222,400 228,000 WATER IMPACT FEES 253,400 252,000 INTEREST - WATER 5,000 10,000 INTEREST - WASTEWATER 5,000 10,000 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE 56,200 63,000 TOTAL REVENUES 15,037,500 15,467,200 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES AND REVENUES $ 16,317,300 $ 16,696,900 7

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES WATER/WASTEWATER FUND - EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2016-2017 2015/16 2016/17 DIRECT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ 512,500 $ 516,500 WATER DEPARTMENT 650,900 655,400 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 840,600 962,400 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 1,743,100 1,727,400 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL 3,747,100 3,861,700 OTHER EXPENSES DEBT SERVICE - WATER 521,100 590,300 DEBT SERVICE - WASTEWATER 611,300 636,900 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 60,200 192,400 OTHER EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES 142,300 21,200 KENT COUNTY TREATMENT CHARGE 4,130,000 4,130,000 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 1,420,200 1,653,800 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 25,000 25,000 BOND ISSUE COSTS - 40,000 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 6,910,100 7,289,600 TRANSFER TO: GENERAL FUND FROM WATER 550,000 500,000 GENERAL FUND FROM WASTEWATER 300,000 375,000 WATER IMP AND EXT 1,800,000 1,000,000 WASTEWATER IMP AND EXT 1,500,000 1,000,000 CONTINGENCY RESERVE WATER 32,000 110,000 CONTINGENCY RESERVE WASTEWATER - 60,000 GENERAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND 248,400 - ELECTRIC IMP AND EXT - 231,200 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 4,430,400 3,276,200 TOTAL EXPENSES 15,087,600 14,427,500 BUDGET BALANCES BUDGET BALANCE WATER 566,500 1,103,100 BUDGET BALANCE WASTEWATER 663,200 1,166,300 BUDGET BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,229,700 2,269,400 TOTAL CURRENT YEAR BALANCES AND EXPENSES $ 16,317,300 $ 16,696,900 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 8

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES WATER/WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Million Eight Hundred Thirty Eight Thousand Five Hundred dollars ($7,838,500) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year begining July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 4,990,300 $ 1,179,900 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 4,551,700 952,600 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 9,542,000 2,132,500 REVENUES STATE LOAN FUND - WATER - 2,400,000 STATE LOAN FUND - WASTEWATER - 884,000 TRANS FR OPERATING FUND - WATER 1,800,000 1,000,000 TRANS FR OPERATING FUND - WASTEWATER 1,500,000 1,000,000 TRANSFER FROM WATER IMPACT FEE - 190,800 TRANSFER FROM WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE 165,000 211,200 INTEREST INCOME 69,900 20,000 GRANT RECEIPTS 20,300 - MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS 61,400 - TOTAL REVENUES 3,616,600 5,706,000 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES & REVENUES $ 13,158,600 $ 7,838,500 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET W/WW ENGINEERING $ - $ 30,400 WATER 5,442,600 1,338,800 WASTEWATER 5,299,100 2,021,200 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 284,400 1,200,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 11,026,100 4,590,400 BUDGET BALANCE - WATER 1,179,900 2,226,700 BUDGET BALANCE - WASTEWATER 952,600 1,021,400 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 2,132,500 3,248,100 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCES & EXPENSES $ 13,158,600 $ 7,838,500 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 9

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES WATER/WASTEWATER CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Thirty Five Thousand Eight hundred dollars ($1,035,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 510,700 $ 514,600 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 509,500 513,400 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,020,200 1,028,000 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 3,900 3,900 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 3,900 3,900 TOTAL RECEIPTS 7,800 7,800 TOTALS $ 1,028,000 $ 1,035,800 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 514,600 $ 518,500 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 513,400 517,300 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,028,000 1,035,800 TOTALS $ 1,028,000 $ 1,035,800 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 10

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES WATER/WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Million Thirty Seven Thousand dollars ($2,037,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated fromcurrent revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 427,500 $ 430,700 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 1,742,700 1,590,900 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 2,170,200 2,021,600 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 3,200 3,300 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 13,200 12,100 TOTAL RECEIPTS 16,400 15,400 TOTALS $ 2,186,600 $ 2,037,000 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO I & E FUND FROM WATER IMPACT FEES $ - $ 190,800 TRANSFER TO I & E FUND FROM WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES 165,000 211,200 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER 430,700 243,200 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 1,590,900 1,391,800 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 2,021,600 1,635,000 TOTALS $ 2,186,600 $ 2,037,000 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 11

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES WATER/WASTEWATER CONTINGENCY RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Hundred One Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($501,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 105,200 $ 138,000 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 190,200 191,600 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 295,400 329,600 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS 2,200 2,500 TRANSFER FROM OPERATING ACCOUNT TO WATER 32,000 110,000 TRANSFER FROM OPERATING ACCOUNT TO WASTEWATER - 60,000 TOTAL RECEIPTS 34,200 172,500 TOTALS $ 329,600 $ 502,100 BUDGET SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER 138,000 249,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 191,600 253,100 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 329,600 502,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND CURRENT YEAR BALANCES $ 329,600 $ 502,100 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 12

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ninety Two Million Seven Hundred Thirty Thousand Eight hundred dollars ($92,730,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 8,337,500 $ 13,302,200 BASE REVENUE DIRECT SALES TO CUSTOMER 78,493,800 77,193,200 UTILITY TAX 1,309,600 1,287,900 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 911,400 548,600 RENT REVENUE 202,600 223,000 GREEN ENERGY 128,000 128,000 INTEREST EARNINGS 35,000 47,900 TRANSFER FROM RATE STABILIZATION 750,000 - TOTAL REVENUES 81,830,400 79,428,600 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE & REVENUES 90,167,900 92,730,800 13

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2016-2017 2015/16 2016/17 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET POWER SUPPLY $ 23,402,600 $ 16,557,600 SOLAR ENERGY 2,313,900 2,313,900 SOLAR RENEWAL ENERGY CREDITS 363,400 363,400 POWER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 996,000 996,000 REC'S (Renewable Energy Credits) 673,400 673,400 RGGI (Regional Greenhouse Gas Init.) 175,000 175,000 PJM CHARGES - ENERGY 7,966,100 12,357,900 PJM CHARGES - TRANSMISSION & FEES 7,932,500 7,603,800 CAPACITY CHARGES 10,225,100 10,160,600 SUB-TOTAL POWER SUPPLY 54,048,000 51,201,600 PLANT OPERATIONS 6,382,900 6,215,700 GENERATIONS FUELS 1,167,300 256,900 PJM SPOT MARKET ENERGY (1,708,300) (804,900) PJM CREDITS (360,000) (360,000) CAPACITY CREDITS (10,472,100) (7,355,100) GENERATION SUBTOTAL (4,990,200) (2,047,400) POWER SUPPLY & GENERATION SUBTOTAL 49,057,800 49,154,200 DIRECT EXPENDITURES TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION 3,437,300 3,605,700 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 1,120,900 1,247,900 ADMINISTRATION 834,300 929,700 METER READING 363,200 378,600 SYSTEMS OPERATIONS 601,500 651,700 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTALS 6,357,200 6,813,600 OTHER EXPENSES: UTILITY TAX 1,309,600 1,287,900 ALLOW FOR UNCOLLECTIBLES 200,000 250,000 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 57,700 600,000 OTHER EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES 353,400 58,900 GREEN ENERGY PAYMENT TO DEMEC 128,000 128,000 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 3,586,700 3,564,900 INTEREST ON DEPOSITS 20,500 21,000 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 259,300 275,000 DEBT SERVICE 1,617,700 1,618,000 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 7,532,900 7,803,700 TRANSFER TO: IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION 3,500,000 2,500,000 GENERAL FUND 10,000,000 10,000,000 TRANSFER TO FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE - 750,000 TRANSFER TO DEPRECIATION RESERVE - 750,000 TRANSFER INSURANCE RESERVE 10,000 - TRANSFER CONTINGENCY RESERVE 13,000 - TRANSFER RATE STABILIZATION RESERVE 394,800 1,250,000 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 13,917,800 15,250,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 76,865,700 79,021,500 BUDGET BALANCE - WORKING CAPITAL 13,302,200 13,709,300 TOTALS $ 90,167,900 $ 92,730,800 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 14

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES ELECTRIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Nine Million Two Hundred Sixteen Thousand Seven Hundred dollars ($9,216,700) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: REVENUES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 7,095,300 $ 5,540,500 REVENUES TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC 3,500,000 2,500,000 TRANSFER FROM WATER/WASTEWATER - 231,200 TRANSFER FROM 2010 BOND RESERVE 2,108,000 - GENERAL SERVICE BILLING 1,900,000 900,000 DEVELOPMENT GRANTS 15,000 5,000 INTEREST EARNINGS 57,900 40,000 TOTAL REVENUES 7,580,900 3,676,200 TOTALS $ 14,676,200 $ 9,216,700 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET ELECTRIC GENERATION $ 2,299,800 $ 1,842,800 TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION 3,524,900 1,975,000 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 3,288,000 910,700 METER READING 23,000 41,800 ERP SYSTEM - 1,000,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 9,135,700 5,770,300 BUDGET BALANCE 5,540,500 3,446,400 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCE & EXPENSES $ 14,676,200 $ 9,216,700 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 15

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES ELECTRIC UTILITY CONTINGENCY RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Forty Eight Thousand Three Hundred dollars ($848,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 822,700 $ 841,900 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS 6,200 6,400 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC FUND 13,000 - TOTAL RECEIPTS 19,200 6,400 TOTALS $ 841,900 $ 848,300 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 841,900 848,300 TOTALS $ 841,900 $ 848,300 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 16

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPRECIATION RESERVE SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ten Million Nine Hundred Ten Thousand Two Hundred dollars ($10,910,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 9,957,900 $ 10,083,600 INTEREST EARNINGS 125,700 76,600 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND - 750,000 TOTALS $ 10,083,600 $ 10,910,200 BUDGET SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 10,083,600 10,910,200 TOTALS $ 10,083,600 $ 10,910,200 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 17

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES ELECTRIC UTILITY FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ten Million Nine Hundred Sixty One Thousand Seven Hundred dollars ($10,961,700) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 10,107,900 $ 10,134,700 INTEREST EARNINGS 76,800 77,000 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND - 750,000 TOTALS $ 10,184,700 $ 10,961,700 BUDGET SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE 50,000 - CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 10,134,700 10,961,700 TOTALS $ 10,184,700 $ 10,961,700 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 18

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES ELECTRIC UTILITY INSURANCE STABLIZATION RESERVE SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Sixty Two Thousand dollars ($762,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 740,600 $ 756,300 INTEREST EARNINGS 5,700 5,700 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC FUND 10,000 - TOTALS $ 756,300 $ 762,000 BUDGET SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 756,300 762,000 TOTALS $ 756,300 $ 762,000 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 19

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES ELECTRIC UTILITY RATE STABLIZATION RESERVE SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Million Five Hundred Eleven Thousand Nine Hundred dollars ($8,511,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 7,505,400 $ 7,207,100 INTEREST EARNINGS 56,900 54,800 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND 394,800 1,250,000 TOTALS $ 7,957,100 $ 8,511,900 BUDGET SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC FUND $ 750,000 $ - CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 7,207,100 8,511,900 TOTALS $ 7,957,100 $ 8,511,900 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 20

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES MUNICIPAL STREET AID FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Six Hundred Seventy Three Thousand Two Hundred dollars ($673,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 100 $ 100 STATE GRANT 673,100 673,100 TOTALS 673,200 673,200 BUDGET SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND 673,100 673,100 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 100 100 TOTALS $ 673,200 $ 673,200 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 21

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES ELECTRONIC RED LIGHT SAFETY PROGRAM CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Hundred Ninety Seven Thousand dollars ($497,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: CASH RECEIPTS 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 100 $ 100 STATE GRANT 480,000 496,900 TOTALS 480,100 497,000 BUDGET SUMMARY 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND 480,000 496,900 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 100 100 TOTALS $ 480,100 $ 497,000 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 22

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Million One Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Seven Hundred dollars ($2,136,700) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: OPERATING REVENUES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 1,248,200 $ 1,256,300 INTEREST INCOME 20,700 25,000 PREMIUM FROM CITY 620,000 855,400 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 9,400 - TOTALS $ 1,898,300 $ 2,136,700 OPERATING EXPENSES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES - CLAIMS $ 475,000 $ 475,000 INSURANCE 103,900 105,500 STATE OF DEL - SELF INSURANCE TAX 38,100 39,000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,000 25,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 642,000 644,500 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 1,256,300 1,492,200 TOTALS $ 1,898,300 $ 2,136,700 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 23

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Hundred Ninety Two Thousand One Hundred dollars ($592,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: OPERATING REVENUES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 57,800 $ 92,100 GRANTS REVENUE 839,300 500,000 INTEREST INCOME 500 - TOTALS $ 897,600 $ 592,100 OPERATING EXPENSES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET PROGRAM EXP. GRANT RELATED $ 805,500 $ 500,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 92,100 92,100 TOTALS $ 897,600 $ 592,100 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 24

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES LIBRARY GRANT FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Three Hundred dollars ($325,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: OPERATING REVENUES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 30,600 $ 17,300 STATE GRANT 305,500 305,500 FEDERAL GRANT 2,500 2,500 TOTALS $ 338,600 $ 325,300 OPERATING EXPENSES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET STATE GRANTS FURNITURE/FIXTURES $ 7,000 $ 10,500 OFFICE SUPPLIES 30,800 30,800 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 12,500 12,500 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 27,500 27,500 BOOKS 146,600 150,600 AUDIO VISUAL SUPPLIES 77,200 77,200 POSTAGE 100 100 TRAINING/CONF/FOOD/TRAV 8,800 5,300 OFF EQP/REPAIRS & MAINT 6,300 6,300 OTHER EQUIP - LEASE 2,000 2,000 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES STATE GRANTS 318,800 322,800 FEDERAL GRANTS PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 2,500 2,500 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES FEDERAL GRANTS 2,500 2,500 GRAND TOTAL EXPENSES 321,300 325,300 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 17,300 - TOTALS $ 338,600 $ 325,300 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 25

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES POLICE GRANTS FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Six Hundred Fourteen Thousand Three Hundred dollars ($614,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: OPERATING REVENUES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 154,900 $ 295,300 STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS RECEIVED 1,111,900 319,000 TOTALS 1,266,800 614,300 OPERATING EXPENSES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET EXPENDITURES PERSONNEL EXPENDITURES CADET PROGRAM SALARIES 71,400 71,400 CADET PROGRAM FICA 5,400 5,500 CADET PROGRAM W/COMP 3,500 4,200 MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES POLICE EQUIPT & PROG SUPP 384,600 284,000 TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT 20,000 - ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES CELL PHONE CHARGES 15,000 16,000 TRAINING 72,600 17,000 AUDIT FEES 1,000 1,000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 299,400 5,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 872,900 404,100 OTHER FINANCING USES OPERATING TRANSFERS-OUT 172,700 82,000 TOTAL FINANCING USES 172,700 82,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 221,200 128,200 TOTALS $ 1,266,800 $ 614,300 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 26

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES CDBG GRANT FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Thirty Eight Thousand Six Hundred dollars ($238,600) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: OPERATING REVENUES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 2,100 $ 2,100 CDBG GRANTS RECEIVED 272,800 236,500 TOTALS 274,900 238,600 OPERATING EXPENSES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET EXPENDITURES PRIOR YEAR CLOSING COST/DOWN PAYMENT PROGRAM 900 - PRIOR YEAR NCALL RESEARCH INC. 6,500 - CURRENT YEAR CLOSING COST/DOWN PAYMENT PROGRAM 60,000 50,000 CURRENT YEAR CONNECTION SUPP PROGRAM 7,400 7,200 CURRENT YEAR DOVER INTERFAITH MINISTRY 27,000 22,000 CURRENT YEAR MHDC EMERGENCY HOME REPAIR 35,300 25,000 CURRENT YEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 40,000 30,000 CURRENT YEAR MHDC HOMEOWNER REHAB. 52,900 55,000 CURRENT YEAR PEOPLES PLACE 6,800 - CURRENT YEAR SALARIES 36,000 47,300 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 272,800 236,500 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 2,100 2,100 TOTALS $ 274,900 $ 238,600 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 27

2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES SUBSTANCE ABUSE GRANTS FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Hundred Twenty One Thousand Three Hundred dollars ($121,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: OPERATING REVENUES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 98,200 $ 60,300 STATE GRANTS RECEIVED 28,000 28,000 RECREATION REVENUE 50,000 33,000 TOTALS 176,200 121,300 OPERATING EXPENSES 2015/16 2016/17 REVISED BUDGET EXPENDITURES TEMPORARY HELP/BENEFITS 60,200 60,200 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 55,700 55,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 115,900 115,200 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 60,300 6,100 TOTALS $ 176,200 $ 121,300 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: JUNE 27, 2016 28

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION The Dover Human Relations Commission (DHRC) meeting was held on May 25, 2016 at 6:05 p.m. with Chairman Henderson presiding. Members present were Mr. McGiffin, Ms. Mullen, and Mr. Roach. Ms. Bogle and Mrs. Sadusky were absent. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. McGiffin moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Roach and unanimously carried. Election of Chair - Communications Committee Mr. Henderson advised members that Commissioner Griffith, former Chair of the Communications Committee, had resigned from the DHRC. Mr. McGiffin noted that Ms. Griffith was serving on the Delaware Commission for Women. Mr. Roach moved to defer the election of the chair for the Communications Committee until the next meeting, due to vacancies on the Commission. The motion was seconded by Mr. McGiffin and unanimously carried. Mr. Roach advised members that he would also be leaving the DHRC, as he would be serving on the Planning Commission. Mr. Henderson stated that Mayor Christiansen and Council President Slavin had advised him that there was a conflict because he was serving as a City Chaplain and also as a member of the DHRC. He stated that he must make a choice regarding which office he would like to continue to hold. DHRC Committee Updates Government Policy, Programs, and Practices Committee (McGiffin) Mr. McGiffin indicated that City Council had approved the Government Policy, Programs, and Practices (GPPP) Committee’s plan to conduct an online survey of employees with regard to diversity in the City of Dover. He stated that Mr. Andy Siegel, Information Technology (IT) Director would put the survey online. Mr. McGiffin indicated that when the results are tallied, he and Mr. Henderson would prepare a report, estimating that it would be complete in June or July 2016. Mr. McGiffin suggested that Mr. Henderson prepare a brief invitation to employees to complete the survey. Community Engagement Committee (Roach) During the City Council meeting of February 22, 2016, members approved the Commission’s recommendation that Dover High School students be asked to create a logo for the DHRC in exchange for a $50 gift certificate. During the DHRC meeting of April 20, 2016, Mr. Roach indicated that he would discuss this with the Art Department at Dover High School, and if he received submissions in a timely manner, he would request that review of the logos be added to the next meeting agenda.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2016 PAGE 2 During the DHRC meeting of May 25, 2016, Mr. Roach stated that he had a conversation with the art and graphic design instructors at Dover High School, who both indicated that they would be happy to put this challenge to their students. He suggested that the next agenda include discussion regarding when submissions would be received for review, how the gift certificate would be awarded, and whether the certificate should be presented before City Council. Mr. Roach advised that he expected to have logo submissions in hand around the time of the next meeting, since he planned to meet with Dover High staff next week. He noted that the school year would end June 6, 2016 and that staff indicated they could incorporate this into an end-of-the-year project. Mr. Roach reiterated that he had accepted an appointment on the Planning Commission and planned to submit his resignation from the DHRC. He advised members that serving on the DHRC under the tutelage of Mr. McGiffin, Mr. Henderson, and former DHRC chairs Mr. Cecil Wilson and Ms. S. Renee Smith given him greater understanding. Mr. Roach stated that his service had been an eye-opening experience regarding human relations in the City of Dover and offered to serve in any capacity allowed in regard to the DHRC logo. Mr. Roach also offered to leave contact information for Mr. Dionta Cox, who had taken photographs of the DHRC members during their meeting of April 20, 2016, in case additional pictures were needed in the future. Mr. Roach stated that he was in contact with Councilman Sudler in regard to a task force related to gangs, and he planned to be involved in this as a citizen rather than as a Commissioner. In response to Mr. Henderson regarding the status of the Reach One, Teach One Challenge mentoring project, Mr. Roach stated his belief that Commissioner Bogle was spearheading that venture. Ms. Mullen advised members that she had reached out to several civic associations and was on the agenda for Capital Park on July 12, 2016 and the White Oak/Towne Point Civic Association for August 19, 2016 to explain what the DHRC is about. She questioned if there was a DHRC brochure or if this information is on the City’s website. Responding, Mr. Roach explained that the website has information that includes the DHRC’s mission statement, vision, members’ bios, and the Dover Human Relations Commission 2015-2018 Strategic Plan. He suggested that an item be placed on the next agenda to discuss developing a palm card for the DHRC, perhaps including the mission statement and vision. Education Committee (Bogle) Mr. Roach moved to defer the Education Committee Update until the next meeting, due to the absence of Commissioner Bogle. The motion was seconded by Mr. McGiffin and unanimously carried. Communications Committee Mr. McGiffin stated his understanding that the DHRC was planning to staff a table at the upcoming African American Festival. (City Clerk’s Office Note: During their meeting of February 22, 2016, City Council approved the Commission’s recommendation that the Communications Committee work up a plan to recommend the DHRC’s presence at the African American Festival this year. During their meeting of April 25, 2016, Council approved the Commission’s recommendation to allocate $200 for the African American Festival from the DHRC budget.)

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2016 PAGE 3 Mr. Roach stated that the purpose of participating in the African American Festival was for members to become known in the community; however, he noted that there were only a few members that could potentially attend. Ms. Mullen advised that she could not attend. Mr. McGiffin felt that it would be a mistake to participate this year, due to the limited number of members who could participate. Responding to Mr. McGiffin, Mr. Roach stated that he was unsure if former Commissioner Griffith had reached out to Mr. Salters regarding a table at the festival. Mr. Roach felt that spending money on a table and attempting to get donations of water to distribute did not seem feasible because only Mr. McGiffin and Mr. Henderson had confirmed that they were able to be at the festival. Due to the lack of Commissioners available to attend, Mr. Roach moved to forego participation in this year’s African American Festival. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Mullen and unanimously carried. Old Business DHRC Vacancies (First and Fourth Districts) Mr. Henderson stated that he would talk to Council President Slavin regarding the DHRC vacancies for the First and Fourth Districts. Mr. Roach stated that, due to the fact that he would be leaving the DHRC, he would do everything in his power to make one (1) or two (2) recommendations for DHRC representatives from the Fourth District. He noted that there were two (2) vacancies in the Fourth District. In response to Mr. McGiffin, Mrs. Jody Stein, Administrative Assistant, City Clerk’s Office, advised that there were two (2) vacancies in the First District. Mr. McGiffin suggested that members commit to trying to coming up with names to suggest individuals for appointment to the DHRC and that these be submitted through the City Clerk’s Office. Mr. McGiffin moved for adjournment. The motion was seconded by Mr. Roach and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 6:32 p.m. Theodore A. Henderson Chair TAH/JS/dd/tm S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Misc-Minutes\HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION\2016\05-25-2016 DHRC.wpd

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE The Council Committee of the Whole Meeting was held on June 28, 2016 at 6:00 p.m., with Council President Slavin presiding. Members of Council present were Mr. Anderson (arrived at 6:05 p.m. and departed at 7:27 p.m.), Mr. Sudler, Mr. Neil, Mr. Cole, Mr. Hosfelt, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison (departed at 7:21 p.m. and returned at 7:28 p.m.). Mr. Lewis was absent. Mayor Christiansen was also present. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Keller and Mr. Shelton (Safety Advisory and Transportation), and Ms. Stewart (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). Mr. Shevock was absent. SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE The Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee met with Councilman Hosfelt presiding. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Presentations Speed Control Measures - North State Street Mr. Mike Somers, Senior Transportation Planner, Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), and Mr. Glenn (Guy) Pusey III, Engineering Designer, RK&K, introduced themselves. Mr. Somers advised members that they were asked to address speeding concerns on North State Street and had worked with a committee and Representative Sean Lynn, 31st District, to come up with some ideas. Mr. Somers stated that they had a difficult time trying to find something the community would accept because many of the measures considered would take away a lot of the parking in the area due to the way State Street is laid out. Mr. Somers reviewed a presentation entitled “North State Street Proposed Median Island Chicane.” Referring to the overhead rendering of the chicane, he explained that their last effort resulted in a proposed median for the section of North State Street between Pennsylvania Avenue and Columbia Avenue. Mr. Somers stated that the idea was to slow drivers as they come into the corridor. He felt this would be effective in this specific area; however, it would not extend all the way down the street, noting that nothing done in one (1) place would change the nature of all the traffic. Mr. Somers noted that State Representative Sean Lynn had worked with the homeowners in the immediate area and they did not oppose the concept. Mr. Somers explained that the idea was to slow traffic as it enters, noting that there were two (2) general ways to do this: 1) vertical measures, like speed humps, which no one had wanted on State Street; and 2) horizontal measures, such as the median. He noted that a chicane would accommodate trucks and all other vehicles. There would be no need for traffic to stop, but it would slow as it passes through.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 2 Mr. Hutchison questioned if one-way streets were considered. Responding, Mr. Somers indicated that this had been discussed; however, the City did not want to go in this direction just yet. He noted that State Street and Governors Avenue could possibly be paired for one-way traffic; however, the down side to that concept would be that one-way streets tend to increase traffic speed since drivers are all traveling in the same direction. On the positive side, Mr. Somers stated that this measure would provide extra space on the outside of the road that could be pinched in to slow traffic if everyone was traveling in one (1) direction. Mr. Hutchison indicated that he liked the idea of traffic continuing to travel north and south and slowing down approaching traffic. Mr. Slavin stated that another solution that involved taking out one (1) of the inlets to the cemetery in the area had been conceptually proposed. Mr. Somers pointed out the small access road into the graveyard opposite Columbia Avenue. He explained that they had asked the church that maintains the graveyard about the possibility of realigning this intersection, which would create a semi-circular island that would cover that access and a three-way stop. Mr. Somers advised there had been potential to modify this area to allow traffic to exit; however, enough modification could not be made to let traffic enter as well. The church was against this concept; therefore, it was not pursued. Mr. Slavin commented that a solution was needed in this neighborhood, noting that he lives in this area and is very aware of the concerns. He stated that there was a high frequency of vehicles speeding in both directions. Mr. Slavin thought that part of the issue was that the road becomes wider for cars traveling northbound because no one parks in front of the cemetery. The downtown area is choked, causing drivers to slow down, and the sudden crest that leads to the causeway across Silver Lake naturally causes people to accelerate. Mr. Slavin advised that he had seen solutions similar to the median in place and believed that they help to calm traffic. Referring to the depiction of the chicane from a driver’s view, Mr. Somers advised that brickwork had been assumed since this was the most common material used; however, he noted that there could be concrete, a pebble look, or other potential measures. Mr. Slavin stated that, in his experience, anything that disrupts the view of an unimpeded road causes drivers naturally to not accelerate. Mr. Somers advised that the chicane would contain the field of vision. In addition, he stated that the 25 m.p.h. zone stops just north of Pennsylvania Avenue and suggested this be extended to the corner of Columbia Avenue. Mr. Cole moved to recommend moving forward with the proposed median, seconded by Mr. Neil. Ms. Laura Chupp, 315 North State Street, explained that she lives at the corner of Hazel Road and State Street and she has two (2) young children who play outside and safety is a very important aspect of the community for her and her family. Ms. Chupp stated that she agreed with the proposal; however, she wondered if a second median was needed further toward Division Street. She advised that she lives close to Wesley College and traffic in front of her house in the middle of the night is

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 3 very fast. Ms. Chupp indicated that a lot of families with kids live in this area and questioned if a second median could be proposed at a later time, or if a secondary measure could be in the works closer to the downtown area. In response, Mr. Somers stated that they had tried to look at the entire length of the road; however, they could not go much further than Columbia Avenue or perhaps the next street because this would be closer to the stoplight. He indicated that there would be problems because a measure like the median would take all of the frontage, so there would be no parking from approximately 50 feet before the median to 50 feet after it. Mr. Somers stated that if it were put further down, parking would be eliminated for two (2) or three (3) houses on each side of the road. He explained that he was not saying that this was not possible; however, he felt there would be a community fight and the City would have to decide whether they would do this. It was not included in the proposal because of this issue. Mr. Slavin stated that most, if not all, of the houses along North State Street from Hazel Road north have off-street parking, including driveways or garages, so the impact may not be as much as believed. Responding, Mr. Somers stated this was correct, noting that there is a service road on the west side that goes back behind most of the houses, if not all of them. However, he explained that when dealing with the public on such matters, he typically finds that many people are not thinking about the practicality and feasibility of the project but about selling their houses eventually, which causes resistance. Mr. Cole stated that this issue came up during some of the meetings that were held related to this project. Some people had expressed concern about what would happen if this measure was located in front of their houses when they want to sell them. Ms. Sara Herbert, 223 North Bradford Street, stated that one (1) of the things that the old Dover Neighborhood Watch had noted was that there was already a speed monitor at that end of the street and they wanted it to be moved up the street and turned so that it would face south. People driving by Wesley College would go through the crosswalk that was marked for children and would then be able to see their speed when they pass Hazel Road. She stated that Representative Lynn was aware of this suggestion. Mrs. Herbert felt that the speed monitor would help stop traffic heading north on State Street and the median would stop people heading south. Responding, Mr. Hosfelt stated that this could be looked at with City staff, noting that the City has the ability to change the location of these signs. Ms. Herbert advised that one (1) gentleman had volunteered to have the monitor placed in front of his house. Mr. John Caldora informed members that he represented Wesley College at 120 North State Street. He indicated that Wesley College supported the speed control measures because they thought they were necessary to protect their community. Mr. Caldora informed members that one (1) of their freshman students, Brittany Paige, was killed last year at the cross section of Walker Road and North State Street near where the measures were proposed. He advised that Ms. Paige was an education and special education major from Maryland and a bright and warm person who was greatly missed. Mr. Caldora felt that the proposed measures would encourage motorists to pay attention and slow

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 4 down in the area. He thanked Councilmen Neil and Cole, the Old Dover Neighborhood Watch, and DelDOT for their efforts on this project. Mr. Keller questioned where the speed limit increases on State Street. In response, Mr. Somers advised that it currently increases just to the south of the measure, which would be slightly to the north of Pennsylvania Avenue. Mr. Keller asked if it would be feasible for the 25 m.p.h. speed limit to continue through that section. Responding, Mr. Somers suggested extending the 25 m.p.h. speed limit to the corner to encompass this measure, stating that if they had to design for 35 m.p.h., the project would be bigger than proposed. He stated that the size and shape of the project would be dependent upon the speed since the faster the speed, the more open it would have to be, and the less it would slow people down. In response to Mr. Keller, he confirmed that they had already taken a 25 m.p.h. speed limit into consideration. Mr. Cole moved to amend the motion to include a 25 m.p.h. speed limit throughout the measure. The amendment was seconded by Mr. Neil. Mr. Slavin questioned if the 25 m.p.h. speed limit would extend through the entire length of North State Street. Responding, Mr. Somers indicated that the speed limit would apply through the measure. Mr. Slavin asked what the impact would be if the 25 m.p.h. speed limit was extended all the way to Walker Road. In response, Mr. Somers stated his belief that this had been requested previously; however, warrants were not met. He indicated that there was a history on that request and apologized that he had not brought the data with him. Mr. Somers advised that warrants could be met with the addition of the proposed phase, but carrying it all the way down to Walker Road would be a different issue. Mr. Slavin stated that members could recommend that the City deal with DelDOT on this idea, noting his preference for a 25 m.p.h. speed limit all the way down to Walker Road. From his experience, if drivers are given a moment to accelerate, they will accelerate. He indicated that Mr. Cole could clarify his motion to state that he had intended to recommend a 25 m.p.h. speed limit all the way down to Walker Road. Mr. Cole stated his belief that this was what most of the residents had been hoping for and questioned if this could be done. Responding, Mr. Slavin advised that this was a State road and the City would be making a recommendation. Mr. Cole clarified that the motion was intended to include a 25 m.p.h. speed limit to the intersection on Walker Road, and Mr. Neil stated that he agreed. The motion to recommend moving forward with the proposed median and that the 25 m.p.h. speed limit be extended to the intersection on Walker Road was unanimously carried.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 5 Proposed Service Road Behind the Mall Mr. John Paradee of Baird, Mandalas, Brockstedt, 6 South State Street, reviewed a presentation entitled, “June 28, 2016 Presentation to City of Dover Transportation Committee Collector- Distributor Road Modification to the Scarborough Road Interchange.” He advised members that this presentation grew out of the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) 2007 U.S. Route 13 Corridor Study. Mr. Paradee indicated that he would not be asking the City for money but for moral support through the Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) prioritization process. Mr. Paradee referred to the executive summary of the 2007 U.S. Route 13 Circulation Study, which identified the Collector Distributor Road Modification to the Scarborough Road Interchange. He explained that this would be a service road extension off the Scarborough Road interchange running parallel and just west of State Route 1 and would ultimately result in an east- west connector road running between the Dover Mall and Dover Downs to Route 13. Mr. Paradee noted that, since the 2007 Route 13 corridor study was performed, continuing growth and development had strained the existing roadway infrastructure. He informed members that there were a number of significant users in the area, including a few institutions of higher learning, a NASCAR track, a huge retail mall, and recent special events to the west, such as the Firefly Music Festival. Mr. Paradee indicated that he represented Western Development, the owners of the Dover Mall. He stated that discussions had started with DelDOT and the General Assembly two (2) years ago about how to move forward with this project, and in last year’s Bond Bill, the General Assembly authorized DelDOT to conduct three (3) studies, including a feasibility study, a toll study, and a wetlands delineation to determine whether or not the project could move forward. Mr. Paradee advised that a feasibility study was recently completed and a copy was provided to the City electronically. He noted that after spending a lot of money and studying this with many experts, the conclusion was that the road modification being discussed was feasible and would relieve congestion, improve circulation, and enhance traffic safety. Mr. Paradee stated that it would also foster and accommodate continued economic growth and development in the corridor. He advised that this was important due to the strained infrastructure system and many users who were trying to grow but could not, noting that this was a chicken and egg problem. Mr. Paradee indicated that the Dover Mall owns approximately 88 acres to the east, behind them and they were proposing to expand to triple the current size of the mall; however, they cannot without the traffic infrastructure. He stated that current users were having trouble, noting that Sears was thinking about leaving and, in all likelihood, would do so in the near term. Mr. Paradee felt that other users in the area would continue to suffer severe stress if efforts are not made to improve the infrastructure system. Mr. Paradee informed members that the next steps would be to conduct a toll study. DelDOT had already picked a consultant to perform the study, which would be concluded sometime this year. He stated that wetlands delineation was also underway and would hopefully be concluded early next year. Mr. Paradee indicated that the owners of the Dover Mall were paying all of the costs of the studies, so there would be no cost to State citizens. He advised that once the project is completed through the design stage, construction costs were estimated at approximately $15M, which he felt was reasonable, noting that the project would involve a service road and ramps and would not include a lot of overpass work. Mr. Paradee estimated the cost at a little more than half the cost of two (2) interchanges that were recently constructed in north Frederica and another under construction in south Frederica. He felt that this was a good value for the money and a low cost investment in terms of what would be received in economic development and traffic safety, noting that the project

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 6 would all be funded by additional toll revenue. Mr. Paradee indicated that tolls would be placed on the north and south side so that those who use the road for access and convenience would pay for this privilege. He stated the expectation that the additional toll would be approximately $0.50, which would pay for the entire design and construction of the improvements. Mr. Paradee was hopeful that they would reach the design phase sometime in the next year and, if the project moves forward, he believed it could be completed within four (4) years. Mr. Paradee indicated that the City’s support was vital. He stated that they were performing study and analysis work currently but would not commit to moving forward with the project unless and until the Dover/Kent County MPO escalates the project’s priority. Mr. Paradee explained that the project was already in the MPO priority list but was presently approximately two-thirds down the list. He requested that the City support elevating the priority of this project before the Dover/Kent County MPO due to its value compared to the funds required. Mr. Paradee indicated that this area is important to the City, Kent County, and the State of Delaware to improve traffic safety and circulation, and at the same time encourage continuing economic development in the Route 13 corridor. He felt that these goals could not be accomplished without alleviating a lot of the pressure in this area. Mr. Neil questioned if the City Manager had any concerns about this request. Responding, Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, stated that there were no negatives to this proposal from the City’s standpoint, especially if construction costs could be recovered through a new user-based toll. He advised that the City met with different developers approximately a dozen time in the last decade to talk about the expansion of the Dover Mall. Mr. Koenig informed members that there had been a general complaint regarding the direction that the mall seemed to be going, and if this would ignite the next round of investment in the mall, as well as the potential for spin-off business or additional development, he felt it was feasible and worthwhile. He indicated that several concepts had been discussed, and he was unsure which were being currently pursued. Generally, Mr. Koenig thought it would be an improvement to this area, would spur additional development on U. S. Route 13, and may encourage additional annexation into the City on the north side of the mall over the long run. It would also be helpful for commercial development on the highway. Mr. Koenig had no objections to the proposal, feeling that it was a great idea to try and recover the cost through the toll revenue because he was unsure that there was any other way to get this done at this point. Mayor Christiansen advised members that he serves as the Vice Chairman of the Dover/Kent County MPO. He felt that this was a very admirable idea and that Mr. Paradee had made a great point that it would be an economic development tool. Mayor Christiansen expressed the need to move forward as rapidly as possible. He asked, since this was a Council Committee of the Whole meeting, that members authorize him by consensus to send or carry a letter to the July 6, 2016 meeting of the MPO requesting that this project be moved up in priority. Mayor Christiansen reminded members that, over the last year-and-a-half, Secretary of Transportation Jennifer Cohan had been very receptive to the needs of Kent County. He felt that the sooner that the City submits this letter, the sooner this could happen.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 7 Mr. Neil moved to recommend authorizing the Mayor to provide a letter at the July 6, 2016 meeting of the Dover/Kent County MPO requesting that the proposed Dover Mall Service Road be elevated on the MPO transportation prioritization list. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Hare felt that this project was long overdue. He reminded members that Christiana Mall ran into this same situation years ago because the mall wanted to expand and it was difficult to exit Route 1 into the mall and a lot of changes were made in that area. Mr. Hare advised that he had suggested to those coming north from the beach that they stop at the Dover Mall; however, they felt it was easier to go on to Christiana. He felt that easy access to the mall and that area would spur business and that the City should pursue moving this project to the top five (5) or top of the list. Mr. Paradee indicated that they had done marketing studies that demonstrated that a number of users traveling north and south through the State of Delaware simply bypass Dover because it is too congested. Mayor Christiansen requested that Mr. Paradee provide the verbiage on exactly what he was requesting and indicated that, if it pleased Council, he would initiate that letter, copy members of Council, and personally carry it to the meeting on July 6, 2016. The motion to recommend authorizing the Mayor to provide a letter at the July 6, 2016 meeting of the Dover/Kent County MPO requesting that the proposed Dover Mall Service Road be elevated on the MPO’s transportation prioritization list was unanimously carried. Review of Bicycle/Pedestrian Subcommittee Recommendations - Senator Bikeway Design Concept Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that City staff, including the Planning Department, Parks and Recreation Department, City Manager’s Office, and Public Works Department, had been working with the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) and their consultants on expanding the transportation network using bicycle and pedestrian improvements throughout the City. He noted that a lot of hard work and thought had gone into the presentation and expressed his hope that Council would endorse the concept. Mr. Koenig felt this would be a major improvement to the capital city for bicycling and pedestrian transportation, especially through the downtown area. Mr. Anthony Aglio, Planning Supervisor, Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), explained that he is not a formal member of the Bicycle/Pedestrian Subcommittee; however, he attends almost every meeting and works with its members. He stated that the City had adopted a bicycle plan earlier this year, and the first recommendation of the plan was the Senator Bikeway design concept. Mr. Aglio advised that this is an east/west bicycle route that would include off-road and a few on-road areas and would connect West Dover, from Dover High School, to East Dover extending across Route 13. Since the route would connect an elementary school, middle school, and the high school, it was named the Senator Bikeway. Mr. Aglio noted that DelDOT had hired a consultant to develop this concept and allocated approximately $720,000 for the first phase. He explained that, in working with the Subcommittee, due to time constraints, a first phase was developed that they believed would be digestible. This would include developing a plan set and

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 8 moving the project forward to construction in FY 18, noting that they would like to start construction at approximately this time next year. Mr. John Hermes, Century Engineering, informed members that his firm had been hired by DelDOT to work on the Senator Bikeway and that it was hoped to obtain City Council’s support. He reviewed a presentation entitled “Senator Bikeway Trail” (Attachment #1). Mr. Hermes advised that the western limit of the project would be Route 8 at Dover High School. The goal would be to provide a separated facility so cyclists would not have to ride in the roadway. Mr. Hermes noted that there are currently sidewalks and a multi-use trail on one (1) side of the route; however, this passage is small and not Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant. He noted that it is ultimately planned to widen the route to 10-12 feet on both sides of the road from Mifflin Road to Saulsbury Road. Mr. Hermes indicated that the next section of the bikeway would be a hot mix surface extending from Saulsbury Road to the railroad tracks that would include a 10-foot wide facility on the north side of the route. After crossing the railroad tracks, the trail would take the first left onto West Street and north to Fulton Street. It would extend down through Wesley College and continue on Delaware Avenue through the Central Middle School property and connect to Silver Lake Park, where there is an existing pedestrian bridge. Mr. Hermes explained that this route was being considered because there was no good opportunity to cross the river on Division Street using existing facilities. The proposed trail would tie well into the park and would also save the money that would have been needed to construct a new bridge. Mr. Hermes indicated that the trail would continue out to White Oak Road from Silver Lake Park and cross Route 13 at the Dunkin’ Donuts location, which is an area of high usage. He stated that DelDOT had considered having the trail extend straight on Division Street; however, there were not as many cyclists or pedestrians crossing at that location. Mr. Hermes felt that the proposed route also included more locations that people on the west side go to or come from. Mr. Hermes explained that Capital School District was supportive of the project, as were planning organizations such as the Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). He indicated that the project was too large to complete all at once and must be broken into phases, noting that multiple meetings would be needed due to the many concerns involved. Referring to page 5 of the presentation, Senator Bikeway Trail - Phase 1, he explained that Phase 1 had been identified as a portion of the route where construction could begin within the next year and also addressed an immediate need in the cycling community. Phase 1 would extend from Saulsbury Road in front of the elementary school and down to West Street, where it would terminate. Mr. Hermes explained that this area was a priority because there are no good pedestrian or bicycle facilities there now, noting that cars drive up to the parking area on this route and the sidewalk is narrow. A 10-foot wide pathway was proposed on the north side of the road from Saulsbury Road to Weston Drive, where there is a new signal. Mr. Hermes advised that they planned to look into landscaping and adding trees north of the pathway to provide shade and greenery where the sidewalk exists today. He stated that the Capital School District was very supportive and loved the idea of better access for those walking to the school.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 9 In reference to page 6 of the presentation, Proposed Cross Section - Division Street between Weston Drive and Railroad Avenue, Mr. Hermes informed members that this section of the trail would be key. Referring to pages 7 - 12, he explained that a parking study was done for the area from Weston Drive to the railroad tracks in conjunction with MPO. It was determined that the parking on the north side of the route is not heavily used, and a multi-use trail was proposed in place of that parking. Mr. Hermes stated this 10-foot-wide, multi-use pathway would use the existing parking on only the north side. This would allow for a three (3) to four (4) foot buffered area with painted striping on the ground and delineators to provide separation between vehicles and bicyclists, while still maintaining sidewalks so that people can walk. Mr. Aglio noted that parking would remain on the south side of the roadway. Mr. Hermes stated that removal of parking is typically a sensitive issue, explaining that a parking study had been done for this area, which contains on-street parking, as well as a substantial amount of off-street parking. He advised that the section from Weston Drive to Railroad Avenue has 22 existing spaces on the north side and 20 on the south. Mr. Hermes stated that they observed the number of spaces being used at different times throughout the day, which were indicated on page 8. For example, between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m., only five (5) of the 22 spaces on the north side were being used. During the busiest times, less than 50% of the parking was being utilized at any one (1) time. Referring to the pictures taken at various times of the day on pages 9-12, Mr. Hermes pointed out a cyclist in a photo taken between 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., noting that the cyclist was riding right next to cars and stating the desire to provide protection in this area. In regard to maintenance of the trail, Mr. Hermes stated that there would be additional striping and plastic delineators, noting that DelDOT would maintain the delineators and restore them if hit. He stated that, because this would be a 10-foot wide area plus an additional buffer, a streetsweeper could maintain and navigate this roadway and meet any regulations or requirements. Mr. Hermes indicated that snow removal would be an issue and DelDOT would be responsible for the road in this area. In terms of getting to the extra small 10-foot wide pathway, he stated that they would continue to talk to Mr. Brian Urbanek, Assistant Director, Statewide Support, DelDOT, and DelDOT maintenance in this regard, and there may be a need to use special equipment. Mr. Hermes noted that the idea is that the roadway would remain open and at some time DelDOT would have to get to the cycle track in that area. He indicated that they were looking for support regarding removal of parking on the north side of the trail, reiterating that parking would remain on the south. He stated that they were planning a meeting with property owners on both the north and south sides this month to review the individual locations. Mr. Aglio noted that they met with the funeral home in this area. Mr. Hermes stated that, as part of the MPO’s Capital Gateway project, they had reached out to some of the property owners and there had been a positive reaction in general. Property owners had indicated that they like the parking, but were willing for it to be removed and supportive of the project. Mr. Hermes noted that Mr. Aglio had stated that approximately $720,000 had been committed to the project, although Mr. Hermes’ presentation had indicated $740,000. He reiterated that DelDOT had committed funding to the project, the design was paid for, construction had been set up for next year, and the City of Dover would not have to spend money this year to implement the project. Mr. Hermes advised that this was the first of many phases, the concept would be continuous, and as soon as this phase is complete they hoped to move right into the next phase. He

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 10 indicated that the next phase had not yet been determined; however, it would also be within this corridor, noting that this was dependent upon various factors, such as right-of-way, permitting, and approval from these committees. Mr. Slavin thanked Mr. Aglio, Mr. Hermes, and members of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Subcommittee for their continued work on this project. He believed it was a nice vision and he was glad to see it coming together. Mr. Slavin questioned the location of the existing pedestrian bridge where the trail would cross the St. Jones River. Responding, Mr. Aglio explained that the crossing of the river at the bridge in Silver Lake Park would be used. He noted that the crossing may need to be upgraded or widened; however, the permitting would be much less significant than creating a new bridge. Mr. Aglio advised that the trail would be brought around the back of the middle school and cross one (1) private property. Mr. Hermes explained that there are two (2) utility crossings that pedestrians walk over along Division Street that are encased in concrete. They had considered trying to make use of these crossings or putting a new structure next to them, but the cost was substantial. Mr. Hermes indicated that the existing utility concrete walkways could not be used for bridges. Mr. Slavin stated that he had been concerned that the crossing next to the Division Street bridge was being discussed. Responding, Mr. Hermes stated that, in the long term, they would like to see a bridge there; however, this would have to be a separate structure, and there is a utility and a lot of other concerns there. This had not been ruled out; however, currently they felt that connecting the school to the park and having easier access to White Oak Road would be beneficial. Mr. Aglio noted that the school has an outdoor classroom next to the river that they access and they thought the trail would help students get to and from this location. In response to Mr. Hosfelt, Mr. Hermes stated that members would like a recommendation that this initiative move forward to Council. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, recommended that the Committee and Council endorse the concepts of the Senator Bikeway Trail. He noted that there would be public hearings and the plan would be refined so that construction could hopefully begin next summer. Mr. Koenig stated the desire to continue the momentum of funding going into the capital city from DelDOT. He indicated that there had been a lot of road investment, and now off-road investment was occurring. Mr. Koenig noted that there are a lot of other investments that the City would like DelDOT and the State to make in the City. He expressed his understanding that there would be maintenance obligations for the City at some point because some of the off-road alignment would be on City streets, and the City would likely take on maintenance responsibilities in City parks. Mr. Koenig advised that there had been in-depth discussion about the crossing of the St. Jones River and the concerns with attaching any type of bridge structure to the utility crossings. While this sounded like a good idea at first, in the end none of the engineering staff supported this concept because of the potential for failure and having to take the structure down for maintenance. Mr. Koenig stated that the proposed alignment, while it creates a bend back through the park, is ultimately a better design than going along the road right-of-way. DelDOT had confirmed that the correct crossing of

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 11 Route 13, based on current traffic, would be at White Oak Road versus Route 8, which supported using the school property, going through the City park, coming back out onto King’s Highway, and ultimately crossing at White Oak Road. Mr. Koenig stated that the numbers were starting to indicate that the proposed concept would benefit the City in many ways. Mr. Cole moved to recommend acceptance of the Bicycle Pedestrian Subcommittee recommendations and moving forward with the Senator Bikeway design concept. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Keller questioned how many bicycles were anticipated on the trail. Responding, Mr. Aglio estimated a few hundred per day. The motion to recommend acceptance of the Bicycle Pedestrian Subcommittee recommendations and moving forward with the Senator Bikeway design concept was carried with Mr. Anderson abstaining. Quarterly Update - Bicycle/Pedestrian Subcommittee Mr. Hosfelt referred members to the Bicycle/Pedestrian Subcommittee Quarterly Update - June 2016. Re-Evaluation of the Need for the Blue Light Phones in City Parks Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that over Memorial Day Weekend, the City experienced problems with one (1) of the blue light phones in Silver Lake Park, which was repeatedly dialing the 911 Center for the Dover Police Department and could not be reset. The Electric Department used on-call staff to cut the power to the phone to prevent it from dialing 911. Mr. Koenig indicated that software and systems that support the phones had not been updated since the phones were installed, and he felt that the manufacturer would recommend investing additional funds if the phones were kept in place. Mr. Koenig stated that the Police Department had provided information regarding the total calls for service from the five (5) blue light phones, including hang-ups, and the history revealed that there were not many calls. Since 2007, there had been a total of five (5) legitimate calls through Memorial Day Weekend 2016. All of the legitimate calls were from Silver Lake Park, three (3) from the beach area and two (2) from the boat ramp area. Those five (5) calls represented distress requests within a City park. Mr. Koenig stated it was important to note that Silver Lake Park was the only park that had received any type of calls and no other park had received any legitimate calls in the time frame. Based on the history and the evolution and availability of cellular phones, staff requested that Council consider that this program be discontinued. Mr. Koenig indicated that if Council would like to discontinue this program in phases, staff recommended removing the phones that had no legitimate calls over the time frame, which would potentially provide parts to repair the existing phones. He advised that Ms. Kay Dietz-Sass, Emergency Management Coordinator, had found literature indicating that the institutions that initiated this type of safety measure, predominantly on college campuses, were starting to gravitate away from these systems. They were being discontinued due to the availability of cell phones, GPS applications, and apps that direct dial to 911 services, as well as the fact that long-term maintenance of these facilities is expensive. Although the City was

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 12 only paying approximately $1,000 per year, if there was a need for maintenance upgrades, hardware upgrades, or repairs, these costs could be fairly substantial. Mr. Koenig indicated that the actual cost for installation had been several thousand dollars for each device. He reiterated that this issue arose due to failure of components in the existing system that created discomfort in the 911 Center. After looking at legitimate calls versus costs and potential cost on the horizon to maintain the system, staff recommended eliminating the program over time or removing the system in its entirety within a 90-day window. Mr. Sudler questioned if a study had been done regarding how many people had used their cell phones in emergency situations at the parks versus the blue light phones. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that he did not have that information available. He assumed that the 911 Center could provide the information; however, it had not been requested. Mr. Sudler expressed concern regarding how homeless individuals or those who do not own cell phones could make emergency calls. Mr. Anderson noted there were approximately 18 calls in the Silver Lake area and no calls from anywhere else. He questioned if Mr. Koenig would be amenable to phasing out the phones at Silver Lake Park at the end of the calendar year because summer is a busy time. This would also provide notice that the City was eliminating the phones. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that the two (2) phones in White Oak Park were not being used and he would like them removed first if a regression in the use of the phones was desired. He indicated that the phones at Silver Lake Park could stay in use until there are real problems and the parts cannot be replaced. Mr. Anderson noted that the cost of the phones was approximately $50 per call, stating that he personally would not mind phasing them out at the end of the year. He advised that he would like people to have some notice and for the phones to remain in place during the busy season for calls. In response to Mr. Koenig, Mr. Anderson stated that he was discussing only the phones at Silver Lake Park. Mr. Koenig stated that they could be phased out over the next six (6) months and some type of notice, such as Facebook or Twitter, could be provided. Responding to Mr. Anderson regarding any concerns the Police Department may have, Captain David Spicer stated that the Police Department had researched this matter and determined that they had received very few legitimate calls. Even though there were 18 calls in 2015, many of those were hang-ups or malfunctions from emergency phones. Captain Spicer noted that there were only five (5) legitimate calls in the last 10 years, some of which were related to subjects in distress lying on the ground and possibly not breathing, etc. He noted that three (3) of the phones had no usage at all. Captain Spicer advised that the phones had become a nuisance and a hindrance that tied up a lot of personnel at the 911 Center. Mr. Slavin recalled that former Councilman Ken Hogan had sponsored the blue phone effort, which was implemented during a spike in the availability of cell phones. Mr. Slavin questioned if calls were transmitted through hard wiring or cellular calls, and Mr. Koenig stated his understanding that calls are cellular.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 13 Responding to Mr. Slavin, Mr. Koenig indicated that the calls are transmitted using cellular technology. He also responded that the infrastructure could potentially be used for cameras at the sites. Mr. Koenig advised that if there are legitimate camera locations, they would be considered whether the phones are removed or not. Mr. Slavin stated that while the infrastructure may not be used for phones, they provide a sense of security and access, and he felt that these lights allow people to feel a little safer when they are in a park. Rather than obliterating what the City has there as a safety presence, he suggested giving thought to reverse engineering the infrastructure and replacing it with something else. Mr. Shelton indicted that 92% of the population have cell phones; therefore, 8% of the population do not have cell phones. He expressed concern that there would be no avenue for them to contact someone if they did encounter a problem. Mr. Shelton felt that phasing the phones out would be a good idea; however, he felt there should be another method in place for people to feel comfortable and secure. Mr. Sudler asked Captain Spicer if they had data regarding the total number of calls over the last 10 years. Captain Spicer reiterated that 18 calls were logged; however, there may have been 20 to 30 malfunction calls with that particular unit which were not logged. Although five (5) calls were listed for 2016, Ms. Christina Kober, 911 Supervisor, Dover Police Department, advised him that she had documented 20 to 30 malfunctions along with those five (5) calls. Mr. Sudler stated that there was nothing in place to protect those who do not own cell phones and might be in an emergency situation. He noted that many homeless individuals sleep in these parks and need an avenue to call for help. Mr. Sudler felt that until there was some method to protect them, he was not confident in phasing out blue phone access for emergencies. Mr. Sudler moved to refer this matter to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee with a comparison and analysis of data regarding blue phone usage versus the number of emergency cell phone calls received over the last five (5) years. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson. Responding to Mr. Hare’s request for clarification, Mr. Anderson stated that the cost of $50 per call was arrived at by dividing the maintenance cost by the number of calls received. In response to Mr. Hare regarding the actual cost of the phones, Mr. Koenig indicated that the total cost of the phone lines was between $950 and $1,050 per year, noting that this did not include repairs, since no repairs had been done. He indicated that the City was spending approximately $1,000 per year on the phone line access for the five (5) phones, or approximately $200 per phone. Mr. Slavin indicated that if this matter were referred to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee, consideration might be given to leaving one (1) phone in place in one of the more high profile areas. This might ameliorate some of members’ concerns, and repairs could be made utilizing parts from the items taken out of circulation.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 14 The motion to refer this matter to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee with a comparison and analysis of data regarding blue phone usage versus the number of emergency cell phone calls received over the last five (5) years was unanimously carried. Updates Hamlet Shopping Center Mr. Sudler stated that the majority of the business owners/managers in the Hamlet Shopping Center had not had any major concerns and, according to them, crime, loitering, and panhandling had decreased. He indicated that they preferred the police presence in the parking area and appreciated the City’s efforts to provide additional security in that area. Captain David Spicer, Dover Police Department, indicated that he had asked the crime analyst, Mr. Robert Scott, to pull the numbers for the Hamlet and areas surrounding the shopping center. Captain Spicer indicated that in 2014 there were 41 reported crimes in that area, including assault, criminal mischief, disorderly conduct, local fugitives who were wanted, firearm possession, robberies, and trespassing. In 2015 there was an increase to 88 reported crimes, including criminal mischief, local fugitives, 17 thefts, assaults, burglaries, a reported carjacking, and disorderly conduct. In 2016, there were 29 reported crimes. Captain Spicer stated that this trend would result in approximately 70 crimes by the end of this year, which would be slightly lower than last year’s numbers. The crimes being experienced included an assault, three (3) burglaries, and three (3) juveniles apprehended for daytime burglaries. He noted that there are continual incidences of disorderly conduct and shoplifting. Responding to Mr. Hosfelt, Captain Spicer explained that these statistics also included the Hamlet residential area located behind the shopping center. He stated that he had been advised by Mr. Scott that patrols had been increased due to issues with crime in the area and as a result of Joint Finance Committee funding received by the Dover Police Department. Captain Spicer noted that Lieutenant Christopher Hermance indicated that there had been 256 additional man-hours spent patrolling in this area, which is considered the 860 district. He noted that the Police Department had taken a proactive approach to try to reduce crime in the shopping center and surrounding area. Mr. Sudler asked if there had been a decrease in crime from 2015 to 2016 in the Hamlet Shopping Center. Responding, Captain Spicer indicated that crime had decreased. Mayor Christiansen stated that he had spoken to a number of business owners and shoppers in this area. He commented that the parking lot was in atrocious condition and needed re-striping and the handicapped signs needed to be redone. Mayor Christiansen advised that a number of those who live in the Hamlet area had indicated that tractor-trailers were parking overnight or for days at a time. He questioned if there was an ordinance in place that could address that issue. Responding, Captain Spicer stated his belief that there was an ordinance that prohibits tractor-trailers from parking on a City street; however, he believed that they do have a right to park on private property as long as the business owners do not disagree with them.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 15 Mayor Christiansen indicated his belief that there was a concern among the shoppers, business owners, and landlords. Captain Spicer stated that staff could contact the businesses, noting that if the issues are brought to the attention of the Police Department, the Department can take appropriate action or advise them on what to do. If they want vehicles to be towed, those affected would have to tow the vehicles, and this would not be the Police Department’s obligation. Mr. Hare stated, from his experience, that this would be the responsibility of the property owner. The businesses may not like the tractor-trailers parked there; however, the owner may have granted them permission to park their trucks on the outskirts. The Elks Lodge - 217 North Kirkwood Street Mr. Sudler informed members that residents of the Kirkwood community continue to deal with loitering, loud noise, and patrons from the Elks Club having sex in their yards, often leaving condoms, bottles, and debris. He had continued to assure them that the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee and the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee had heard their concerns and were working with staff regarding amendments to the current ordinance relating to properties with non-conforming uses. Mr. Sudler advised that the Kirkwood Neighborhood Watch Committee continued to meet regularly. In their last meeting, Senator Brian Bushweller, Representative Sean Lynn, City Council President Tim Slavin; Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development; and Councilman Anderson, were all present to hear the intensity of Kirkwood residents’ cries for relief from the Elks Lodge, especially on Sunday evenings into early Monday mornings. Mr. Sudler stated that the Kirkwood community and surrounding areas had confidence that the City would provide relief within a reasonable time frame. Captain David Spicer, Police Department, stated that Mr. Robert Scott ran complaints for 2014, 2015, and 2016, and there were 18 complaints associated with the Elks Lodge on North Kirkwood Street. There were burglary alarms in 2014, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, trespassing, and a weapon violation. In 2015, there were 26 reported crimes, including an accident, criminal mischief, disorderly conduct, a couple of fights, eight (8) loitering complaints, and two (2) shots fired. In 2016, there had been three (3) criminal complaints, including two (2) disorderly conduct and one (1) loitering complaint. Captain Spicer indicated that the only explanation he could offer was that, because of funding received from the Joint Finance Committee, much of the Police Department’s attention had been focused in the 820 district due to the loitering and problems in the North New Street and Fulton Street areas. So far this year, approximately 800 additional man-hours had been spent on Fulton Street, Kirkwood Street, and the surrounding area. Captain Spicer felt that the police presence there had dramatically decreased crime. He believed that these three (3) complaints would probably coincide with the three (3) complaints documented so far at the Elks Club. Mr. Hare stated his understanding that the police officers had been working two (2) hour shifts in front of the Fulton Deli, noting that the street now looked deserted. He stated his understanding that a rental permit could be revoked for criminal violations and asked if a business license be revoked for continual criminal violations. Mr. Koenig stated that he was unsure if a business license could be revoked for that reason.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 16 Noting that Captain Spicer had mentioned that there were only three (3) complaints in this area, Mr. Sudler stated that he had called at least three (3) times himself this year in regard to the Elks Lodge and residents and members of the Kirkwood Community Neighborhood Watch had also made calls. Mr. Sudler asked how complaints were defined and if they include calls received or incidents where an officer stops individuals and finds something wrong. Responding, Captain Spicer explained that if someone calls, the dispatcher may record the call as the address that the call comes from rather than the Elks Lodge and this could explain why complaints might not be shown for the actual business. If an officer rides by and sees people loitering outside the Elks Lodge, takes appropriate enforcement action, finds there is a crime, and takes someone into custody, the business address would be logged as the location of the arrest and associated with the crime. Mr. Sudler advised that the Police Department is short staffed and may have 11 officers each night for 38,000 people, stating that he advocates more officers. He questioned if live data, including the time, is provided to the Police Department. Mr. Sudler indicated this would show that managers of the club were present, seeing those loitering, and not doing anything proactively to get them to come into the club. He noted that the management had argued that once individuals are on the sidewalk, they are the Dover Police Department’s responsibility; however, according to the Department of Justice, it was management’s responsibility as well because they are the magnet bringing patrons there. Mr. Sudler felt that if managers were not being proactive, the City needed to put something in place to hold them accountable. He believed this was unfair to the residents and the Police Department. Captain Spicer indicated that Police Chief Paul Bernat had made adjustments in personnel and expended the Department’s Street Crimes Unit, which is a very busy and aggressive unit. Captain Spicer advised that this area has a lot of loitering and drug activity. He stated that, year-to- date for the City, there had been 56 burglaries and 41 had been solved, which was a 78% clearance rate. Captain Spicer advised that there had been 33 robberies this year and 27 had been cleared, for an 82% clearance rate. There had been 17 separate shootings, including10 in the downtown area, and 35% of those had been cleared. Captain Spicer noted that these incidents are sometimes very difficult to figure out and officers do not receive a lot of cooperation from some of those injured or the witnesses. In addition, 43 firearms had been seized in the City so far this year, including handguns and other types of weapons. Captain Spicer informed members that the men and women of the Dover Police Department were working extremely hard to make the City safer. Viability of the ShotSpotter Gunshot Detection and Location Service This item was deferred due to time constraints. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting, seconded by Mr. Keller and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:22 p.m.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 17 LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting was held with Chairman Hare presiding. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Cole and unanimously carried. Fiscal Year 2015-16 Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant Program - Joint Grant with Smyrna Police Department and Kent County The Dover Police Department recently received its annual allocation from the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) for the 2016 Justice Assistance Grant (JAG). Similar to previous years, Dover Police Department was identified as a disparate funding agency along with Smyrna Police Department and Kent County. This disparate condition requires the submission of a joint grant application for the three agencies. Although no funds were designated for Kent County in the allocation document, a Memorandum of Understanding will be completed and signed by all three agencies and will state that Kent County will waive any claim to funding on the grant. The Dover Police Department will serve as the fiscal and administrative agent for the grant. Responding to Ms. Stewart regarding the cost of maintenance for the system, Mr. Koenig stated that the costs would be relatively small for the added infrastructure; however, he cautioned that these numbers add up over time. He explained that these grants usually provide an opportunity to expand technology, but there is also an associated maintenance cost, just as when streets are added. Mr. Koenig advised that the police infrastructure was growing, so there would be expenses that would impact the City budget at some point. Mayor Christiansen noted that there would also be an opportunity to reapply for the grant funds, noting that this is an ongoing grant. Mr. Koenig stated that the grant program was important to expanding the technology and service infrastructure; however, there is a cost to the City budget at some point. Mr. Anderson questioned if the City would want to acquire this particular technology if the grants were not available. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that it would; however, the question was whether the City should have to spend $100 of City money versus $10 of City money to get the same net effect. He advised that the City of Dover had been very good about applying for grants, obtaining the technology, closing out the grants, and accounting for all of the money, noting that additional procedures are required when grant funds are obtained. Mr. Koenig indicated that, because of the size of the Police Department and the dedication and ability of staff, the City is able to fill out grant applications, advocate for grants, and receive them. He felt there was no question that, of all the City departments, the Police Department was probably the highest priority when it comes to getting grants. Mr. Koenig stated that there are many grants available to law enforcement, so this is part of the funding technique for that type of service.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2016 PAGE 18 Mr. Neil moved to approve the grant project as requested, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Discussion - Fiscal Year Audit Program Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, reviewed a presentation entitled “Auditor’s Responsibility for Communicating with Audit Committee.” Referring to page 3, Mrs. Mitchell reviewed the three (3) primary purposes of the auditors and the significant findings from the audit on page 6. She noted that the audit calendar was provided so that members would be aware of the tentative schedule for completing the audit this year. Actuary Services Contract - Pension and Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Members were advised that the Finance Department requested proposals for Actuarial Services on May 5, 2016 (RFP #16-0041FN). In order to continue efficiencies in preparing the data and cost savings, the RFP requested that each actuary perform valuation services for both the Civilian and Police Pension Plans and the Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB). Mrs. Mitchell advised members that the RFP resulted in a proposed change from the City’s current actuary, Milliman, Inc., due to the significant difference in prices submitted. She explained that Milliman, Inc. provides investment advisory services to the City through another arm of their company, and this investment service would stay intact. Mrs. Mitchell explained that Nyhart Actuary & Employee Benefits had provided actuary services for the City when the OPEB trust began and prior to the City’s contract with Milliman, Inc. Staff recommended awarding a five (5) year contract, to begin in FY17 and end in FY21, to Nyhart for valuation services totaling $96,700 and hourly rates for benefits consulting as quoted in their response to the City of Dover RFP #16-0041FN – Pension & Other Post Employment Benefits Actuarial Services and Benefits Consulting. Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hosfelt and unanimously carried. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cole and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m. By unanimous consent, the Council Committee of the Whole meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m. Timothy A. Slavin Council President TAS/TM/js/dd/tm S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Committee-Minutes\2016\06-28-2016-CCW.wpd Attachments Attachment #1 - Presentation - Senator Bikeway Trail

ATTACHMENT #1 Council Committee of the Whole Meeting of 06/28/2016 Senator Bikeway Trail Welcome

Senator Bikeway Trail Agenda Project Overview Phase 1 Key Elements

Senator Bikeway Trail

Senator Bikeway Trail /

Senator Bikeway Trail – Phase 1 /

Senator Bikeway Trail

Senator Bikeway Trail

Senator Bikeway Trail

Senator Bikeway Trail

Senator Bikeway Trail

Senator Bikeway Trail

Senator Bikeway Trail

Senator Bikeway Trail Project Highlights Maintenance Proposed Removal of North Side Parking Future Meeting with Properties (July 2016) DelDOT has Construction Funding ($740 K) for 2017

Monthly Report May 2016 Office of City Assessor

ASSESSOR’S OFFICE Number of Deeds Stamped for the Transfer Tax Dollar Amount for the Month of May 2015/2016 Month of May 2015/2016 32 $100 $82 27 29 Thousands 35 24 30 $50 25 $50 $12 20 10 13 $17 $13 $11 15 $3 10 0 2 3 5 $0 5 $0 0 2015 2016 2015 2016 First Time Buyer for the Month of May 2015/2016 Realty Property May 2015/2016 Sales in Dollars Received Prior to Recording 40 32 $5 24 $6 $3 $2 Millions 30 $4 $2 $1 $2 $0 $1 $0 20 10 13 $0 10 0 2015 2016 Res. Non‐First Time Buyers Res. First Time Buyers 2015 2016 Major Updates March ‐16 April ‐ 16 May ‐ 16 Assessment Change ‐$542,400 $1,815,900 $1,256,000 Residential Sales Ratio Report Sales in Study Total Assessed Total Sale Price Ratio PRD Value 37 $5,674,100 $5,987,311 0.95 1.06 1

ASSESSOR’S OFFICE Ratio – Assessed Value divided by Sale Price. PRD – Mean – A PRD above 1.03 tends to indicate assessment regressivity – high valued properties are under appraised relative to low valued properties. A PRD below .98 tends to indicate assessment progressivity – high valued properties are relatively over appraised. Points of Interest Scanning & Filing ‐ All new deeds are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. ‐ All appeal documents and correspondence are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. ‐ All old property record cards are being scanned and indexed into Fortis. Assessor’s Office ‐ 2016 Appeal Hearings have been completed (see attached spread sheet) 2

JUN 15, 2016 CITY OF DOVER PAGE: 1 09:05 AM SALES RATIO REPORT CA324 PARID NBHD LUC ADDRESS UNITS STYLE YRBLT STORIES SFLA GRADE CDU TOTAL APPR SALE DT PRICE ASR ED05-056.20-01-44.00 18 R10 103 MAPLE GLEN DR 1 14 2003 1 2025 B+ AV 222,000 19-MAY-16 255,000 .87 ED05-057.17-02-09.00 18 R10 217 MILLCREEK DR 1 8 1994 2 1911 C+ AV 155,600 06-MAY-16 152,500 1.02 ED05-067.00-03-07.00- 6 R10 18 SESKINORE CT 8 2016 1 1560 B+ VG 198,700 27-MAY-16 294,894 .67

JUN 15, 2016 CITY OF DOVER PAGE: 2 09:05 AM SALES RATIO REPORT CA324 PARID NBHD LUC ADDRESS UNITS STYLE YRBLT STORIES SFLA GRADE CDU TOTAL APPR SALE DT PRICE ASR 011 ED05-067.11-01-71.00 10 R10 909 SCHOOLHOUSE LN 1 16 1968 1 1922 C AV 163,000 09-MAY-16 167,000 .98 ED05-067.12-04-48.00 8 R10 43 REPRESENTATIVE LN 13 2016 2 2163 B- AV 184,600 10-MAY-16 191,845 .96 ED05-067.12-04-53.00 8 R10 53 REPRESENTATIVE LN 13 2016 2 2143 B- AV 182,400 13-MAY-16 186,000 .98 ED05-067.13-01-42.00 3 R10 34 HOYLAKE CT 1 14 1975 1 2078 B+ AV 204,200 06-MAY-16 206,000 .99 ED05-067.14-04-26.00 18 R10 3 PIN OAK DR 1 6 1993 2 2510 B- GD 202,200 18-MAY-16 235,000 .86 ED05-067.15-01-10.00 2 R10 64 VILLAGE DR 1 13 1973 2 1450 C- AV 102,000 26-MAY-16 78,000 1.31 ED05-067.15-01-26.00 2 R10 87 VILLAGE DR 1 13 1974 2 1273 C- GD 95,600 15-MAY-16 75,000 1.27 ED05-067.15-01-36.00 2 R10 59 VILLAGE DR 1 13 1974 2 1298 C- AV 84,100 24-MAY-16 48,000 1.75 ED05-067.16-02-01.00 10 R10 323 COLUMBIA AVE 1 3 1951 1 934 C AV 132,900 05-MAY-16 100,000 1.33 ED05-067.19-03-26.00 17 R10 736 BICENTENNIAL BLVD 1 5 1987 2 2364 B AV 208,300 03-MAY-16 227,000 .92 ED05-068.17-01-21.00 8 R10 518 PENNSYLVANIA AVE EXT 1 5 1968 2 2354 A- GD 228,500 23-MAY-16 220,000 1.04 ED05-068.17-01-49.00 8 R10 46 RODNEY RD 1 3 1950 1.5 1544 C+ AV 151,400 31-MAY-16 172,000 .88 ED05-068.17-03-02.00 8 R10 28 WASHINGTON ST 1 3 2006 1 2397 B- AV 232,800 12-MAY-16 230,000 1.01 ED05-068.18-05-59.00 7 R10 53 GREENHILL RD 1 14 1950 1 1194 C AV 104,600 26-MAY-16 112,500 .93 ED05-068.19-05-52.00 14 R10 165 LEXINGTON PL 1 13 2009 3 2201 C+ GD 154,900 23-MAY-16 195,000 .79 ED05-076.03-02-39.00 14 R10 352 PARADEE DR 1 13 2007 2 1760 C+ AV 130,700 17-MAY-16 130,000 1.01 ED05-076.03-02-84.00 14 R10 332 TRIBBITT ST 1 13 2014 2 1388 C+ AV 118,000 24-MAY-16 146,000 .81 ED05-076.03-05-87.00 11 R10 39 WELLINGTON AVE 1 2016 2 3332 B+ AV 273,500 24-MAY-16 284,720 .96 ED05-076.04-06-03.00 2 R10 516 S GREENBERRY LN 1 13 2010 2 1296 C+ AV 142,800 31-MAY-16 156,000 .92 ED05-076.05-04-01.007 102 R50 36 COURTSIDE DR 1 20 1978 1 1008 C- AV 43,100 20-MAY-16 45,000 .96 ED05-076.05-04-01.040 102 R50 21 PAR HAVEN DR 1 20 1978 1 1008 C- AV 43,700 13-MAY-16 48,000 .91 ED05-076.08-02-51.00 9 R10 204 N NEW ST 1 1 1930 2 1366 C- AV 78,100 24-MAY-16 45,000 1.74 ED05-076.13-05-38.00 14 R10 235 NORTHDOWN DR 1 13 2000 2 1848 C+ AV 128,600 17-MAY-16 97,000 1.33 ED05-077.06-01-85.00 8 R10 239 BAYARD AVE 1 3 1950 1 1516 C+ AV 147,400 09-MAY-16 162,800 .91 ED05-077.06-02-63.00 7 R10 751 E LOOCKERMAN ST 1 14 1956 1 1436 C GD 162,300 13-MAY-16 151,000 1.07 ED05-077.07-01-32.00 6 R10 63 MORIARTY ST 1 13 2005 2 1554 C AV 121,600 31-MAY-16 122,900 .99 ED05-077.07-06-43.00 6 R10 718 MARTA DR 1 2016 2 2320 B- AV 193,200 17-MAY-16 224,990 .86 ED05-077.07-06-45.00 6 R10 714 MARTA DR 1 2016 2 1680 B- AV 187,800 20-MAY-16 208,662 .9 ED05-077.07-07-85.00 6 R10 126 NOB HILL RD 1 13 2007 2 1496 B- AV 125,100 06-MAY-16 153,500 .82 ED05-077.13-02-40.00 4 R10 805 S STATE ST 1 1 1911 2 1716 C- AV 145,600 06-MAY-16 180,000 .81 ED05-077.17-04-47.00 4 R10 67 LOTUS ST 1 1 1942 2 1314 C- GD 112,700 09-MAY-16 127,000 .89 ED05-085.08-01-78.00 12 R10 128 LYNNHAVEN DR 1 3 1950 1.5 2282 B- AV 230,500 13-MAY-16 215,000 1.07

JUN 15, 2016 CITY OF DOVER PAGE: 3 09:05 AM SALES RATIO REPORT CA324 PARID NBHD LUC ADDRESS UNITS STYLE YRBLT STORIES SFLA GRADE CDU TOTAL APPR SALE DT PRICE ASR ED05-085.08-02-63.00 12 R10 419 DOGWOOD CT 1 16 1965 1 1926 C+ AV 128,800 31-MAY-16 169,000 .76 ED05-085.12-01-04.00 12 R10 379 ALDER RD 1 5 1964 2 2004 C+ AV 152,800 13-MAY-16 175,000 .87

2016 Appeal Log Commercial Values after Name PIN# Property Address# 2015 Amount Reque. Amou Appeal Board Decision T OWENS LLC ED05-077.09-01-47.01 150 S GOVERNORS AVE $127,400 $11,700 $80,700 APPROVED NEW VALUE JARRELL PROPERTIES LLC ED05-067.00-01-32.00 1282 MCKEE RD $435,000 $208,200 298,000 APPROVED NEW VALUE Exempt Request Name PIN# Property Address # 2015 Amount Reque. Amount Board Decision WHATCOAT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC. ED05-067.19-02-11.00 992 WHATCOAT VILLAGE DR $4,186,800 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-077.09-01-01.00 67 S QUEEN ST $13,800 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-076.08-06-43.00 18 S QUEEN ST $0 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-076.08-06-24.00 47 S KIRKWOOD ST $11,900 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-076.08-05-36.00 27 N NEW ST $13,100 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-076.08-05-18.00 24 N NEW ST $0 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-076.08-05-20.00 20 N NEW ST 47,600 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-077.09-01-02.00 101 S QUEEN ST 13,400 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-076.08-06-42.00 16 S QUEEN ST 0 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-076.08-05-73.00 45 S QUEEN ST 11,900 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-076.08-05-34.00 19 N NEW ST $75,500 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-076.08-04-36.00 23 N KIRKWOOD ST $10,300 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-076.08-05-29.00 223 W DIVISION ST $0 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-077.05-03-04.00 53 S NEW ST $47,500 $0.00 $0.00 Approved CDHFH ED05-077.05-03-39.00 50 S GOVERNORS AVE $102,500 $0.00 $0.00 Approved Stipulations Name Pin# Property Address # 2015 Amount Reque. Amount ARNOLD RICHARD O & ALICIA J ED05-077.05-02-54.00 1 KINGS HWY N.E. $313,300 278,400 APPROVED STIPULATION AHRENS, WILLIAM LC05-058.14-01-01.70 700 MCGINNIS DR $107,300 $88,000 91,100 APPROVED STIPULATION YONG BILLY M ED05-077.17-01-45.06 863 MONROE TER $182,800 $155,000 159,200 APPROVED STIPULATION LUMOR STEPHEN E ED05-067.01-01-44.00 314 TOPAZ CIR $264,600 $252,300 252,300 APPROVED STIPULATION FITZPATRICK PAMELA & OTHERS ED05-077.05-03-60.00 118 W DIVISION ST $303,900 $175,000 185,200 APPROVED STIPULATION Totals $6,268,600 $1,344,900

CITY MANAGER’S MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2016 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016

Customer Service  In the month of May, we processed 6,425 credit card payments for the month totaling $1,138,305.16. Human Resources  ICMA Training for City Staff. Library  990 attended 64 programs for adults.  326 attended 26 programs for teens.  778 attended 38 programs for children.  18 volunteers completed 329 hours of service.  602 attended 37 programs/classes coordinated through the Job Center. Public Works  Working on CIP and additional funding for future street program and other projects. 2 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016

CUSTOMER SERVICES Extensions of Credit WORK ORDERS PROCESSED 3,000 400 326 2,500 1,998 2,0752,144 300 1,904 2,000 1,861 1,7701,7211,717 1,6941,659 228 1,646 1,536 1,507 200 1,500 127 111 1,000 100 76 500 0 May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 CUTS FOR NON PAYMENT CUSTOMER PAYMENT USAGE 80,000 $2,000,000 1,902,218.95 55,604 60,000 56,063 $1,600,000 $1,200,000 40,000 25,425 25,492 21,093 20,385 $800,000 20,000 1,801 1,651 $400,000 $246,469 0 $119,242 Drive-Thru Over the Mail, Drop Credit Bank Drafts Window Counter Box Cards $- May 2016 May 2015 FYTD16 FYTD15 2016 YTD 2015YTD FY 2016 FY 2015 Major Program Updates May 2016 May 2015 Difference Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Number of Customers Served 22,294 21,633 661 232,270 230,952 Final Bills 606 667 (61) 7,422 7,095 Estimated Bills 200 169 31 2,487 1,912 Penalties Posted $ 5,163 $ 14,935 (9,772) $ 144,085 $ 199,964 Extensions of Credit - Amount Extended $ 28,266 $ 116,275 (88,009) $ 900,074 $ 960,103 Balance Transfers $ 5,530 $ 2,199 3,331 $ 232,485 $ 65,493 Utility Collections $ 27,157 $ 28,162 (1,005) $ 419,013 $ 633,207 Special Assessments $ - $ - - $ - $ - Miscellaneous Billings $ 127,835 $ 120,361 7,475 $ 1,368,458 $ 1,104,843 CNP through Disconnect Collars $ - $ - - $ - $ - Court Cases $ - $ - - $ - $ - Tamperings $ - $ - - $ - $ - Taxes Levied (includes carry forward) $ - $ 432,593 (432,593) $ - $ - Billing Adjustments $ - $ (836) 836 $ - $ - Total Taxes Collected $ - $ 26,833 (26,833) $ - $ - Taxes Outstanding $ - $ 404,924 (404,924) $ - $ - Payments in Lieu $ - $ - - $ - $ - City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016 3

HUMAN RESOURCES Category May June July August Sept Oct Dec Jan Feb March April May Total 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 Caucasian* 291 290 291 290 296 300 298 297 296 299 301 302 N/A * Minorities 63 63 64 64 67 66 67 66 67 68 67 70 N/A Hired 9 3 8 2 12 1 3 0 2 9 3 3 55 Terminated/ 4 4 4 1 4 1 5 2 2 5 2 0 34 Resigned/ Retired/Other Transferred/ 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 4 0 13 Promoted Jobs Posted 2 2 1 7 9 4 3 3 2 5 10 2 50 Workers Comp. 2 2 0 4 6 7 1 3 0 1 4 2 32 Injuries Workers Comp. 231 115 260 42 24 211 10 0 166 144 73 0 1276 Hours Insurance Claims 2 2 0 3 1 3 1 5 4 5 1 4 31 339 Full-time Employees: Part-time Employees: 33 (*4 Pitts Center, 1 Recreation, 15 Library, 3 Customer Service, 1 Central Services, 9 Police Department) -Numbers do not reflect, temporary, seasonal, relief fire dispatchers, committee or council members. ** August 2015 Pitts Center Number reduced to 4 to reflect error in July 2015 Positions Hired: (2) Cadets, Parking Enforcement Officer, Library Page Positions Posted: Customer Service Clerk II (part-time), Operations Manager Recruitment Information (Positions closed in May) Position Total Female Male Unknown Black White Hispanic Asian/Pacific American Indi- Unknown In Out Islander an/Alaskan Dover Dover Native Crew Leader 4 - 4 - - 4 - - - - - 4 Utility Maintenance 5 - 5 - 1 2 - - 1 1 2 3 Mechanic Water Service Person 2 - 2 - - 2 - - - - 1 1 (In-House) Motor Equipment 24 - 18 6 2 15 - - 1 6 9 15 Operators Customer Service 28 22 2 4 15 9 2 - - 2 13 15 Clerk II (part-time) Unfilled/Open Positions by Department* Unfilled/Open Posi- May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Marc April May tions 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 h 16 16 By Department 16 Electric 3 2 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 5 Public Works 17 16 18 17 16 16 14 12 13 14 12 10 10 Police 2 3 5 5 1 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 1 All Other Depart- 4 6 11 9.5 7.5 7 8.5 10 12 10.5 8 7 7 ments Totals 26 27 35 33.5 26.5 27 27.5 27 30 30.5 29 26 23 *Not used for Budgeting Purposes ² The following has been updated to reflected the Fiscal 2015-16 Budget Electric: Generation Manager, Transmission and Distribution Coordinator, (2) Substation Technician; Key Accounts Representative Public Works: Utility Maintenance Mechanic II/Wastewater; Motor Equipment Operator I (Sanitation); Motor Equipment Operator I (Streets); Ga rden- er II (Grounds); (2) Motor Equipment I Water/wastewater; Public Works Operations Manager; Motor Equipment Operator II (Grounds); Motor Equipment Operator II (Water/wastewater); Crew Leader (Grounds) Police: Building Maintenance Craftsperson All Other Departments: Customer Service Clerk, Collections (Part-time), (1) Library Clerk I (part-time), Administrative Assistant (Information Technology- part-time); Accountant I, Finance (part-time), AS400/System Operator (Information Technology), Fire Dispatcher; Librarian I; Office Assistant II (Inspections); Inspector III (Fire Marshall) 4 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016

HUMAN RESOURCES continued Turnover Statistics 2010 2011 2012* 2013 * 2014 2015 2016 Total Turnover % 5.57 6.75 11.00 10.91 6.02 11.77 3.0 Termination Turnover % 0.27 1.08 0.29 1.47 .57 .28 -- Resignation Turnover % 2.12 4.05 5.21 5.01 2.29 7.56 2.18 Retirement Turnover % 3.18 1.62 5.50 4.42 3.15 4.20 .82 * Healthcare cost sharing implemented ** Healthcare cost sharing implemented for DOE Average Employees 2010 2011 2012* 2013* 2014 2015 2016 Total Number of Employees 21 25 38 37 21 42 11 Separating from Service Average Number of Full-time 362 356 333 325 331 333 337 Employees Average Number of Part-time 16 15 12 14 18 24 29 Employees * Healthcare cost sharing implemented City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016 5

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Service Requests Resolved Programming Requests Completed 100 88 35 30 90 80 77 30 74 74 70 71 66 25 22 62 60 58 56 20 18 17 52 16 16 50 13 14 13 15 11 40 9 30 31 27 10 7 4 20 13 5 10 0 0 May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 Page Views - City of Dover Web Page 40,000 35,000 30,000 Pages Viewed 25,000 33,605 33,344 34,436 34,652 20,000 31,423 32,737 30,300 28,802 28,730 30,073 27,473 26,032 26,071 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 Current Performance Indicators Last Month Same Month Month Last Year iSeries Availability 100% 100% 100% Server Availability 100% 100% 100% AS/400 Connections (concurrent/authorized users) N/A N/A N/A PCs Supported 360 360 372 Scheduled PCs Replaced - - - Servers Supported 35 35 30 People Trained 7 4 21 Availability Statistics based on 7:00 AM until 5:00 PM Monday—Friday 6 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016

LIBRARY Reference Transactions May 2016 Adult 1690 Teen 472 Children 494 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 Circulation May 16 FYTD 16 May 15 FYTD 15 Dover residents 17,523 203,204 17,931 219,985 Ebooks 2,552 28,284 2,198 22,577 Kent residents* 10,113 123,956 11,008 145,491 Non-county residents 1,759 20,671 1,723 21,383 Registrations Dover residents 266 3,885 271 3,790 Kent residents* 36 355 37 427 Non-county residents 9 68 3 65 Other Visiting Patrons 32,053 311,920 25,330 305,564 Meeting Room Usage 1,592 16,985 1,889 19,804 Photocopier Usage 757 12,963 1,298 12,392 Computer Printing Usage 2,730 36,443 3,247 35,154 Computer Users 4,204 49,067 4,346 51,634 Wireless Computer Users 1,169 18,126 1,799 19,305 Holds (Total) 6,987 75,751 6,241 71,809 *Breakout of Kent County Residential Statistics Circulation Registrations Harrington: 137 Harrington: 1 Milford: 77 Milford: 0 Smyrna: 538 Smyrna: 5 Outside City Limits: 1,759 Outside City Limits: 30 Total Registered Users: (Card Holders) City: 28,475 Kent County: 11,602 Outside Kent County: 1,041 Other Points of Interest: Inter/Interlibrary: 71 items loaned out Technical services: 1,979 items added 59 items borrowed 2,505 items deleted Volunteers: 329 hours of service completed City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016 7

PUBLIC WORKS Construction Inspection Subdivisions Site Development The following required inspection services The following required inspection services Seskinore Court Dover Dental Chestnut Groove Dover High School Clearview Meadows Kent County Recreation Center / Boys and Girls Club Eden Hill Winner Ford Nottingham Meadows 365 North DuPont Hwy (Mission Bbq) Senators Lake Dover Town Center (Old Walmart Renovation) Garrison Oak Technical Park Capital Commons (Old Kmart Renovation) Dover Volkswagen Leander Lakes Sanitation Monthly Total Refuse (Tons) Sanitation Hours 1,500 869 869 925 827 853 913 1000 1,000 806 837 865 776 711 660 716 556 446 449 441 500 500 239 190 177 177 169 145 134 160 130 131 189 152 167 168 160 25 27 - 0 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Bulk Col lecti on Mechanized Hand Trash Container 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 Collection Collection Repair/Del ivery Bulk Automated May 16 May 15 MAY 16 FYTD 16 MAY 15 FYTD 15 Trips to DSWA Sandtown Landfill 173 1,891 176 1,978 Total Tonnage to DSWA 1,032.48 10,635.79 1,045.84 13,597.32 90-Gallon Containers Delivered 44 616 23 335 300-Gallon Containers Delivered 0 0 0 38 Total Man Hours-containers Delivered 25 187 27 370 CURBSIDE RECYCLING TOTAL # OF TOTAL # OF STATS HOUSEHOLDS ACCOUNTS WEIGHT/ AVE. LBS. COLLECTED LBS. May 2016 20,940 9,317 277,700 13.26 8 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016

PUBLIC WORKS continued Streets MAY 16 FYTD 16 MAY 15 FYTD 15 Signed Installed 31 92 17 328 Signs Repaired 9 98 0 131 Curbs Painted Yellow (feet) 2,658 16,656 3,093 15,902 New Post Installed 9 84 3 43 Storm Catch Basins Repaired 3 14 4 21 Storm Catch Basin Repairing (Hrs.) 3 72 39 161 Storm Catch Basins Cleaned 1 423 3 215 Storm Catch Basins Cleaning (Hrs.) 2 82 3 121 Hot Mix Patching (Tons) 7 15 0 6.00 Hot Mix Patching (Hrs.) 4 12 0 73 Cold Mix Patching Hrs.) 23 103 8 266 Concrete Work (Hrs) 15 91 60 224 Concrete Patching (Cubic Yards) 0.52 9 0 0 Ditch Work (Hrs). 0 28 0 39 Street and Alley Maintenance (Hrs) 0 88 160 707 Street Sweeping (Miles) 1,469 11,495 1,558 9,349 Street Sweeping (Cubic Yards) 105 945 390 2,248 Leaves Collected (Cubic Yards) 0.0 11,378 0 8,676 Leaf Collection (Miles) 0 7,099 0 4,796 Grounds Total Work Orders = 9 General = 3 Arborist = 6 Arborist Crew May 2016 May 2015 Trees Trimmed 11 8 Trees Removed 2 6 Stumps Removed 2 4 Root Pruning 0 0 Beautification Crew Transplanted plugs into pots Pulled tulip bulbs Planted hanging baskets Mulched City Hall, the Library, and The Plaza Mowing Crews Mowed, trimmed, and edged designated mowing sites. Assisted with pulling bulbs and mulching of the Library Athletic Field Maintenance Prepped athletic fields for upcoming spring season.  Lined athletic fields  Filled, dragged, and prepped infields Litter Removal Litter person has been doing an outstanding job with emptying trash cans and picking up litter. Helped with pulling bulbs and prepping beds. Miscellaneous Cleaned up and mowed City owned properties on S New Street City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016 9

PUBLIC WORKS continued Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Electric Admin Created an 8.5"x11" map of the wetlands near the Garrison Oak TP. Provided a PDF copy to the requester. Electric Admin Worked with requester over the phone to add the new server connections. Found issue with GIS Viewer profile. Found solution and implemented it Planning Modified Nonconforming Use Collector App Public Works Created a map for Storm Sewer QA/QC Public Works Upgrade ArcGIS to 10.4 Public Works Worked on ArcGIS issues regarding Server and SDE Public Works Added multiple items to the website Public Works Added fields to hydrant database and modified Collector App Public Works Updated the parcels, rentals & active AHIs layers and put them in Update to SDE Public Works Created two 8.5"x11" maps of the parking lots at Weyandt Hall and the Old Dover Library Public Works Updated the trash and recycling zones to reflect recent annexations and updates to the serviced areas. Public Works Created a layer, based on the Recycling Customer's list kept by Public Works, of all the recycling can locations in the City's recycling service zones Public Works/Century Created water, wastewater & stormwater plans for the area around the Engineering Division St bridge over the St Jones. Provided PDF copies to the requester Public Works/Inland Updated the recycling zones to match changes indicated by staff. Recycling Created 10 new PDF maps to send to requester. 10 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016

PUBLIC WORKS continued Fleet and Facilities Management PM Work Orders Completed: 27 Number of Tire Repairs: 11 Number of Road Repairs: 4 Other Work Orders: 67 Repair Hours: 248.5 Road Repair Hours: 4 Total Work Orders: 94 Fabrication Hours: 8 Misc. Hours: 122 PM Hours: 151.5 # Of Scheduled PM’s: 33 # Of Scheduled PM’s: Completed: 15 Major Program Updates May May MEASURE 2016 2015 DIFFERENCE Fleet Maintenance - Scheduled Preventative Maintenance appoint- 15 out of 33 0 out of 33 + 45.45% ments being kept (Quantity and 45.45 % 0% Percentage) Facilities Maintenance Facilities - Routine work orders 28 out of 28 35 out of 35 completed within 5 days (Quantity 0% 100 % 100 % and Percentage) Facilities - Emergency work orders 5 out of 5 1 out of 1 completed within 2 days (Quantity 0% 100 % 100 % and Percentage) City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016 11

PUBLIC WORKS continued Water/Wastewater Water Producti on/Bi l led Cons umpti on/Fl ow to Kent County 2550000 00 2050000 00 1550000 00 1050000 00 5500000 0 5000000 May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Sep 15 Oct 15 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16 Apr 16 May 16 Total Water Prod. Billed Consumpt. Total Flow to County City Readings ENGINEERING SUMMARY Major Program Updates MAY 16 MAY 15 DIFF FY16 YTD FY15 YTD State and Federal Violations 0 violations 0 violations - - - Water Quality Complaints 9 1 +8 94 106 Plan Review Completed With- 9 plans Plans 102 +1 87 in 30 days of Submission 100% 100% OPERATIONAL SUMMARY Task MAY 16 MAY 15 CURRENT FY 1,661,246,00 Water Production - Daily Average 4,712,935 5,147,806 0 Average Field Response Time (goal is <30 minutes) 16.16 25.34 17.15 Water Mains Repaired 2 0 14 Water Service Lines Repaired 1 0 14 Wastewater Mains Repaired 1 0 6 Wastewater Service Lines Repaired 0 1 6 Sewer Lines Flushed - linear feet 110,856 72,703 611,651 Sewer Mains Videoed -linear feet 734 346 12,305 Total Fire Hydrants in Service 1,820 1,820 1,820 Total Water Meters in City Distribution System 14,436 14,199 14,436 12 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016

ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT System Peak Total System Load 200 100,000 155.6 158.5 76,060 80,000 74,133 148 148 68,704 150 135.8 66,383 128.16 61,012 62,563 57,888 116.96 55,011 53,746 56,155 55,967 56,586 110.15 53,202 60,000 101.3 98.93 100.37 100 95.5 94.64 40,000 50 20,000 May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Sep 15 Oct 15 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16 Apr 16 May 16 May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Sep 15 Oct 15 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16 Apr 16 May 16 Outages Customers of Gained/Lost 70 35 3,000 61 30 60 2,500 25 50 2,000 Customers 20 Outages 40 1,500 15 29 30 1,000 10 20 21 20 16 5 500 14 14 13 12 9 9 10 6 0 0 5 May Jul 15 Sep Nov Jan 16 Mar May 0 15 15 15 16 16 Outages Customers May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Sep 15 Oct 15 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16 Apr 16 May 16 Outages: 2 Customers: 206 Electric Monthly Outage Report The annual outage goal will be less than 295 Controllable Outages Average Response Time minutes per customer, which is a Delaware Annual goal is less than 40 Goal is less than 30 minutes Standard. This will be measured by calculating the System Average Interruption Duration Index. Month Year-to-date Month Year-to-date FY 16 YTD FY 15 FY 14 1 20 23.5 Minutes 33.04 Minutes 25.53 45.76 67.76 MAY 16 MAY 15 FY16 YTD PROGRAM UPDATES Tree Trimming 252 578 3458 Number of Oil Releases 3 0 5 Lost Time Accidents – All Electric Utility Divisions 0 0 0 New Services 13 12 211 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016 13

ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT continued May 2016 Electric (EE Capitol Improvement Projects (CIP) S:\Shared Data\Electric Department Bi Weekly Meetings\Capital Improvement Projects Status\2016 Project Number Description Update EE1500 69kV Rebuild Progress: In discussion about possible relocation of some poles for irrigation | (Horsepond to Received permit | Long Point) Schedule: FY15 is for Design |FY16 budget is for construction | EE1509 West Dover Progress: Poles are in| 1 phase is moved Connector - State of DE Schedule: Waiting on customer EE1513 Town Pointe Progress: 10% Complete on setting TXs and pedestals Distribution Feeders Schedule: In progress EE1524 Lenders Lake Progress: Equipment set | 70 meters left to install and 1 TX to complete Phase 1 | Apartments Phase 2 designed, calculating primary fee | 3 more TX pads have been set, close to needing TX Schedule: Waiting on customer EE1537 Kirby & Progress: Primary Design complete | Waiting for primary fee payment Holloway Restaurant Schedule: Waiting on customer EE1607 Horsepond URD Progress: Directional Bores Complete | Need add'l $35K for 6" boring | UG Crew start Distribution dig north end, boring crew start south end | Poles are set Feeder Schedule: Start 6 Jun EE1636 Clearview Mead- Progress: Primary conductors and equipment installed | Pump station has been ener- ows Phase 4 gized | All requested lights have been installed | Done until customer raises and levels equipment…we need to pull wires Schedule: Waiting on customer EE1640 Round Barn Progress: Installing 480 volt service for new grain elevator | Waiting on customer Farm Schedule: Waiting on customer EE1643 Winner Progress: New service to new show room |Design complete | Waiting on pipe install Volkswagen Schedule: Primary fee paid, waiting customer go-ahead EE1644 Retreat Pump Progress: Station upgrade from 120/240 Volt to 208Y/120 volt | Design completed and Station Renova- waiting on public works | Contracts are awarded vault | 8-12 weeks lead time tion Schedule: Waiting on customer EE1646 Loockerman Progress: Met with electrician | Preliminary design complete | Compete except for Retail being energized Schedule: COMPLETE EE1648 Blue Hen - UG Progress: Met with customer and received updated drawings | Waiting on payment | Starting foundations Schedule: In progress EE1520 69Kv Cable Re- Progress: Work to begin this fiscal year | In planning stages | May push out to FY18 placement North St. Substation Schedule: Planning stages 14 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016

ELECTRIC DEPARMENT continued EE1650 Live Front with Progress: Preliminary design | waiting on finance Dual TX Replacement Schedule: Waiting on finance EE1509 West Dover Progress: Poles are in| 1 phase is moved Connector Schedule: Waiting on customer EE1603 Horsepond to Progress: Received permit| Starting in April | 65% complete DAFB, 69 Insulator Install Schedule: In progress EE1649 Burlington - Progress: Compete except for meters New Service Schedule: COMPLETE EE1627 Dover East Progress: Start live front transformer swap FY16 Schedule: FY2016 EE1500 69kV Rebuild Progress: In discussion about possible relocation of some poles for irrigation | Re- (Horsepond to ceived permit | Long Point) Cartanza Schedule: FY15 is for Design |FY16 budget is for construction | EE1622 Persimmon Progress: Work to begin this fiscal year | Material has been allocated | Drawing/ Tree Apts design is complete Schedule: COMPLETE EE1619 Route 8 - Mifflin Progress: Work to begin this fiscal year | Might be night bore. Need to complete de- Road sign Schedule: FY17 complete EE1617 Oak Grove Progress: Work to begin this fiscal year | Preliminary design completed | Permit re- trailer park ceived, boring start 31st Schedule: In progress EE1652 New Street Progress: | Standard poles are set | Waiting for the heads to come in (ETD beginning Lights of Jun) Schedule: In progress EE1610 Fraizer 900 Progress: Preliminary location design complete | waiting on PO approval Circuit Fault Indicators Schedule: Waiting on customer City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2016 15

Prlmecare Medical Transpon, uc. P.O. Box839 Milford, DE 19963 302-422-0900 Fax: 302-422-1082 City of Dover RECEIVED PrimeCare Medical Transport, LLC. JUN 1 3 2016 CITY MANAGER/MAYOR Total 911 ambulance runs 736 Gone on arrival/cancel 101 Transport refusals 27 Stand-by scene 03 Average response time 49 sec. Average time to the scene 06 min. 58 sec. Average time on scene 09 min. 23 sec. Average time to the hospital 07 min. 34 sec. Average daily responses 24 Average daily transports 19 Total patients transported 590

Monthly Management Committee Update May 2016 Prepared By: Arline Holloway Client Services Manager Phone: 904-360-1347 Email: aholloway@teainc.org Date: June 23, 2016 301 W. Bay Street, Suite 2600  Jacksonville, FL 32202  Tel: 904.356.3900  Toll-Free: 800.423.4800

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 1 Power Supply Summary 1 Supply Source Summary 2 Supply Variance 2 Generation Summary 3 Emissions Summary 5 Risk Management Summary 9 II. Budget Report 10 III. Operations Management 13 Operations Summary 13 IV. Appendix: PJM Invoice 27 June 23, 2016 Page ii

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY POWER SUPPLY SUMMARY Overall Power Supply costs were $784,442 below budget, predominantly driven by bearish PJM-Energy, Congestion and Losses and lower PJM-ARR Transmission and Fees. PJM Energy, Congestion and Losses for the month totaled $59,187. Dover’s budgeted cost for all power supply (capacity AND energy) was $70.30/MWh. The actual cost of all power supply (capacity AND energy) was $58.03/MWh. The actual cost of energy alone was $34.66/MWh as opposed to a budgeted energy cost of $41.11. Dover’s total load was 57,588 MWh versus a forecasted load of 58,700 MWh. Hedge purchases totaled 45,072 MWh, which was 78% of the actual load. The budgeted hedge purchase totaled 42,432 MWh, which was 72% of the budgeted load. Dover’s planned energy purchase from the SunPark solar installation was 1,927 MWhs. Dover’s actual energy purchase from the SunPark installation was 1,545 MWhs. Dover’s power purchases from hedge transactions totaled $1,729,231. Purchases from PJM (energy and fees) totaled $1,284,155.23. PJM Revenue (Generation Credits) totaled $(946,724.72). The Grand Total owed to PJM for the month of May $337,430.51. June 23, 2016 Page 1

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 Supply Source Summary Supply Variance Purchased Power Variance Report: May Budget Actual Variance Gross Load 58,700 57,588 1,112 Wholesale Load 56,773 56,043 730 Hedged Volume (MWh) 42,432 45,072 (2,640) Unhedged Volume (MWh) 14,341 10,971 3,370 Dover SunPark Volume (MWh) 1,927 1,545 382 Renewable Energy Credits Volume 289 $ 288 1 Hedged Cost ($/MWh) $ 38.96 $ 38.37 $ 0.59 Unhedged Energy Cost ($/MWh) $ 35.51 $ 5.39 $ 30.11 Solar Energy Cost ($/MWh) $ 130.15 $ 134.20 $ (4.05) Energy Costs ($/MWh) $41.11 $34.66 $6.45 All-in Costs - Energy, Capacity and RECs ($/MWh) $70.30 $58.03 $12.26 June 23, 2016 Page 2

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 GENERATION SUMMARY Generation Revenue FY2015-16 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $- Jul-15 Apr-16 Jun-16 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 May-16 $(100,000) Budget Actual Net Generation Revenue for the month of April was $511,332 versus a budget of $576,800. June 23, 2016 Page 3

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 Generation Breakdown: City of Dover Monthly Wholesale Generation Formula May 2016 Net Generation 0.00 D Production Margin PJM - Generation Economic and Reliability Dispatch $ 5,307.20 A Natural Gas & Oil Consumption Purchases for Generation $ - Natural Gas Transport $ - Eastern Shore Cashout $ - Oil Consumption $ - Subtotal: Natural Gas & Oil Consumption $ - B Gross Production Margin $ 5,307.20 C = (A + B) $/MWh Generation Production Gross Margin $ - E = (C/D) PJM - Capacity Generation Capacity Credit $ 902,145.57 Reactive Supply and Transmission Losses $ 39,271.95 Subtotal: PJM - Capacity $ 941,417.52 F All in Generation Margin All in Generation Margin Total $ 946,724.72 (G = C + F) June 23, 2016 Page 4

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 EMISSIONS SUMMARY Emissions Allowance and Solar Renewable Energy Summary through May 31, 2016 The reinstated Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) replaced the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) beginning January 1, 2015. The State of Delaware was included in the CAIR footprint but is not included in the CSAPR footprint. The separate Clean Air Act acid rain deposition control program (CAA Title IV) which governs SO2 national allowance trading program remains in effect for Dover. Beginning with the January 2015 report, TEA no longer includes a CAIR summary. It will continue to report on Dover’s Clean Air Act Title IV SO2 allowances. Market liquidity for Title IV SO2 allowances is very low, with few transactions occurring. The following table shows estimated values for Dover’s banked allowances, based on a market price assessment published by SNL Energy. Market Value for Clean Air Act Title IV Allowances Commodity $/Ton1 Tons Market Value SO2 Allowances – Title IV $0.56 15,015 $8,408 Total $8,408 Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative The State of Delaware is a participant in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). The City of Dover must comply with RGGI by surrendering carbon dioxide (CO2) allowances pursuant to the State of Delaware’s laws (Title 7, Chapter 60, Sub-Title II-A). Dover had more than a sufficient number of RGGI allowances allocated to cover its requirements through the first compliance period (calendar years 2009-2011) and second compliance period (2012 – 2014). Any unused allowances are carried over (“banked”) for subsequent years. The table below includes Dover’s historical activities, and includes projections through 2020. Two projections are presented: (1) future annual emissions based on the average for 2009 – 2015, and (2) future annual emissions based on 2010 actual CO2 emissions which was the highest emissions year between 2009 and 2015. The table and chart indicate that Dover could run out of banked allowances as early as the end of 2018 under the high emissions scenario and by the end of 2020 under the average scenario. Therefore, Dover has initiated a program to participate in RGGI’s quarterly auctions to ensure it has adequate allowances in the future. 1 June 16, 2016 Daily Power Report by SNL Energy June 23, 2016 Page 5

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 Dover, DE RGGI Allowance History and Forecast - May 2016 CO2 Tons EOY Historical CO2 Tons CO2 Tons Projected EOY Compliance CO2 Allowances Allocated CO2 Emitted & Projected EOY Allowance Emitted - Proj. Emitted - Proj. Balance Year (CY) Purchased Allowances Adjustments- Balance (High) Balance (Avg) (High) (Average) Historical 2009 62,184 5,796 56,388 2010 49,747 32,971 73,164 2011 37,311 17,746 92,729 2012 27,983 15,957 104,755 2013 24,818 10,230 119,343 2014 1,000 N/A 25,427 94,916 2015 14,000 N/A 18,828 90,075 2016 14,000 N/A 14 104,061 19,384 33,000 84,678 71,061 2017 N/A 19,384 33,000 65,294 38,061 2018 N/A 19,384 33,000 45,911 5,061 2019 N/A 19,384 33,000 26,527 -27,939 2020 N/A 19,384 33,000 7,144 -60,939 Dover RGGI Allowance History and Projection May 31, 2016 150,000 100,000 Includes the 14,000 allowances awarded in this year's Auction 31 and Auction 32 Tons of CO2 50,000 0 -50,000 -100,000 Historical CO2 Emissions Projected CO2 Emissions - Avg CO2 Tons Emitted - Proj. (High) EOY Historical Allowance Balance Projected EOY Balance (Average) Projected EOY Balance (High) June 23, 2016 Page 6

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 In anticipation of needing additional RGGI allowances in the future, Dover has participated in the last six out of seven auctions and plans to continue to participate as required. The table below shows details for Dover’s allowance purchases for each of these previous Auctions. Dover’s RGGI Allowance Purchase History Quantity Of RGGI Auction Auction Clearing Allowances Number Auction Date Price ($/Ton) Awarded Total Cost 26 Dec 3, 2014 $5.21 1,000 $ 5,210 27 Mar 11, 2015 $5.41 6,000 32,460 28 June 3, 2015 $5.50 4,000 22,000 29 Sept 3, 2015 $6.02 4,000 24,080 30 Dec 2, 2015 $7.50 0 0 31 Mar 9, 2016 $5.25 8,000 42,000 32 Jun 1, 2016 $4.53 6,000 27,180 Totals 29,000 $152,930 As mentioned in previous reports, RGGI Futures prices dropped dramatically after the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay on EPA’s Clean Power Plan (CPP) and fell even further after the US Court of Appeals rescheduled oral arguments from June until September. Since the June auction, spot prices have rebounded $1.00 with the future price direction in the secondary market likely dependent on the decision of how to incorporate the CPP into the program (currently under review) and summer weather (forecasted to be above-normal in the Northeast). RGGI Futures - June 16, 2016 6.20 6.10 6.00 5.90 RGGI V13 5.80 $/Ton RGGI V14 5.70 5.60 RGGI V15 5.50 RGGI V16 5.40 RGGI V17 5.30 RGGI V18 5.20 6/1/2016 RGGI V19 7/1/2016 8/1/2016 9/1/2016 10/1/2016 11/1/2016 12/1/2016 1/1/2017 2/1/2017 3/1/2017 4/1/2017 5/1/2017 6/1/2017 7/1/2017 8/1/2017 9/1/2017 10/1/2017 11/1/2017 12/1/2017 3/1/2018 6/1/2018 9/1/2018 12/1/2018 12/1/2019 The next RGGI auction will be held on September 7, 2016. The Cost Containment Reserve will be 10 Million tons with a CCR price of $8.00/ton. June 23, 2016 Page 7

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 Based on the June 16, 2016 ICE price for the June 2016 futures price ($5.52/ton), the estimated market value of Dover’s existing 104,0612 ton RGGI allowance bank is $574,416. Renewable Energy Certificates Dover owns two photovoltaic systems totaling 15 kW, consisting of one 5 kW unit at the Utilities Administration Building and two 5 kW units at the McKee Run generating station. Dover also receives solar energy produced by the 10 MW Dover Sun Park which is owned by White Oak Solar Energy, LLC. In addition to all of the physical energy produced by the Sun Park, Dover receives 15% of Sun Park’s Solar Renewable Energy Credits (SRECs). Dover participates in the Delaware Municipal Electric Renewable Portfolio Standard (DMERPS) for compliance with the State of Delaware’s RPS laws applicable to municipal utilities. The first compliance period under DMERPS was for the 12 months ending May 2014 and the second compliance period was for the 12 months ending May 2015. Through the end of generation month April 2016, Dover had accumulated a net total of 7,686 SRECs from these renewable energy resources. This total includes SRECs reported in PJM’s GATS account and Bonus allowances for Sun Park labor. This total is reduced by 2,941 SRECs transferred to DEMEC for surrender on October 3, 2014 for the first compliance period and 2,861 SRECs and 574 bonus SRECs for the second compliance period on November 9, 2015. Delaware periodically holds SRECs auctions; however, these auctions are for size tiers N1 – N3, E1 and E2. The Dover Sun Park is in the N4 tier for large-scale facilities. State-wide carve outs for Tier 4 have been fully subscribed, so there is not a market for tier T4 SRECs in Delaware. The nearest viable market for Dover’s SRECs is Pennsylvania. The most recent daily settlement prices for Pennsylvania SRECs from Bloomberg and SRECTrade are used in the table below. Net SREC PJM-GATS 10% Bonus Balance Market Balance SREC Vintage SRECs for Transferred to DEMEC After Market Clearing Before (June 1 – May 31) Sun Park for 2014/15 Transfer Value Price 2014/15 Labor(3) Compliance and Compliance Surrender GATs Bonus 2011/2012 $0.00 0 290.2 290.2 0 $0 2012/2013 $0.00 2,173 215.7 2,173 215.7 0 $0 2013/2014 $8.00 2,701 268 688 68.1 2,212.8 17,702 2014/2015 $13.00 2,685 266.3 0 0 2,951.3 38,367 2015/2016 $14.00 2,354 168 0 0 2,522.0 35,308 Totals 9,913 1,208.20 2,861 574 7,686.1 $91,377 TEA continues to recommend to Dover to retain these allowances for compliance with its Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS). Additionally, Dover will need to acquire additional SRECs resources in future years. It is apparent that Dover’s portion of SRECs produced by White Oak Solar Energy Center will not 2 Subject to verification from RGGI COATS account. 3 Note: Retroactive Bonus Allowances were not transferred within PJM’s GATS system, but were used to offset 2014/2015 compliance obligation. June 23, 2016 Page 8

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 be sufficient in future years as the compliance requirements increase. DEMEC has indicated that it expects to have excess SRECs available for Dover’s compliance requirements. This and other alternatives will need to be evaluated in the near future. RISK MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Forward power prices in PJM had the most significant movement for PY 2016-2017. Blended Monthly Hedge Cost Change PY Ratio ($/MWh) ($/MWh) 2015-16 76% $ 41.30 ($0.02) 2016-17 64% $ 40.72 $0.23 2017-18 56% $ 40.47 $0.01 2018-19 88% $ 39.63 ($0.03) 2019-20 80% $ 37.22 ($0.11) June 23, 2016 Page 9

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 II. BUDGET REPORT Budget Actual Variance May-16 May-16 Gross Load 58,700 57,588 1,112 Power Supply Hedged Energy $1,653,100 $1,729,231 ($76,131) PJM - Energy, Congestion & Losses $509,200 59,187 $450,013 PJM - ARR, Transmission and Fees $650,000 325,920 $324,080 Dover SUN Park Energy $250,800 $207,362 $43,438 Dover SUN Park RECs $41,800 $38,209 $3,591 RECS (Solar and Non-Solar) $56,100 $0 $56,100 RGGI Credit Costs $0 $0 $0 Management Fees $83,000 $83,000 $0 PJM - Capacity UCAP Obligated Purchased $882,400 $899,048 ($16,648) Subtotal - Power Supply $4,126,400 $3,341,958 $784,442 Power Generation O&M Plant O&M $ 451,800 $ 435,393 $ 16,407 Subtotal Generation O&M $451,800 $ 435,393 $16,407 Power Generation Production Margin PJM - Economic and reliability dispatch ($284,700) ($5,307) ($279,393) Fuel Costs - Natural Gas $194,600 $0 $194,600 Fuel Costs - Oil $0 $0 $0 Testing Costs $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Generation Production Margin ($90,100) ($5,307) $ (84,793) Power Generation Non-Production Revenue PJM - Generation Capacity Credit ($908,500) ($902,146) ($6,354) Emissions Allowance Sales $0 $0 $0 Reactive Supply - Gas ($30,000) ($39,272) $9,272 Subtotal - Non-Production Revenue ($938,500) ($941,418) $2,918 SubTotal - All Generation ($576,800) ($511,332) ($65,468) Total - Utilities Cost $3,549,600 $2,830,626 $718,974 Unit Costs Total - Power Supply $70.30 $58.03 $12.26 Total - Power Generation ($9.83) ($8.88) ($0.95) Final Cost of Service to City of Dover Ratepayers $60.47 $49.15 $11.32 June 23, 2016 Page 10

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 Variance Analysis  Power Supply o Dover consumed 1,112 MWh less than forecasted for the month. o Dover saw an unfavorable variance for budgeted Hedged Energy of $76,131. o Dover experienced a favorable variance for budgeted PJM - Energy, Congestion & Losses of $450,013 and a favorable variance for PJM ARR, Transmission and Fees of $324,080. o The City of Dover realized a favorable variance of $784,442 for power supply vs. the monthly budget. o Dover Sun Park generated 382 MWhs less than forecasted. o This resulted in a net power supply cost positive budget variance of $12.26/MWh below budget.  Generation o Non Production Revenue had a favorable variance of $2,918. o Net All Generation Revenue had an unfavorable variance of $65,468. June 23, 2016 Page 11

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 Budget Actual Variance YTD YTD Gross Load 671,500 674,785 (3,285) Power Supply Hedged Energy $21,797,000 $21,555,271 $241,729 PJM - Energy, Congestion & Losses $6,890,100 2,894,738 $3,995,362 PJM - ARR, Transmission and Fees $7,282,500 4,897,733 $2,384,767 Dover SUN Park Energy $2,010,600 $1,981,195 $29,405 Dover SUN Park RECs $325,000 $313,791 $11,209 RECS (Solar and Non-Solar) $617,100 $0 $617,100 RGGI Credit Costs $131,300 $66,080 $65,220 Management Fees $913,000 $913,000 $0 PJM - Capacity UCAP Obligated Purchased $9,564,000 $9,711,459 ($147,459) Subtotal - Power Supply $49,530,600 $42,333,268 $7,197,332 Power Generation O&M Plant O&M $ 5,935,800 $ 5,177,708 $ 758,092 Subtotal Generation O&M $5,935,800 $ 5,177,708 $758,092 Power Generation Production Margin PJM - Economic and reliability dispatch ($1,423,500) ($979,317) ($444,183) Fuel Costs - Natural Gas $973,000 $196,985 $776,015 Fuel Costs - Oil $0 $742,471 ($742,471) Testing Costs $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Generation Production Margin ($450,500) ($39,861) $ (410,639) Power Generation Non-Production Revenue PJM - Generation Capacity Credit ($9,847,000) ($9,215,100) ($631,900) Emissions Allowance Sales $0 $0 $0 Reactive Supply - Gas ($330,000) ($570,532) $240,532 Subtotal - Non-Production Revenue ($10,177,000) ($9,785,631) ($391,369) SubTotal - All Generation ($4,691,700) ($4,647,784) ($43,916) Total - Utilities Cost $44,838,900 $37,685,484 $7,153,416 Unit Costs Total - Power Supply $73.76 $62.74 $11.03 Total - Power Generation ($6.99) ($6.89) ($0.10) Final Cost of Service to City of Dover Ratepayers $66.77 $55.85 $10.93 June 23, 2016 Page 12

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 III. OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS SUMMARY Executive Summary: During the month of May, there were no recordable accidents, lost time accidents or environmental incidents. The facility has gone 505 days through May 31, 2016 without a Lost Time Accident (LTI) and 411 days since the April 16, 2015 OSHA recordable accident. There were three (3) Near Misses reported in May 2016 at McKee Run or VanSant Generating Station. The team completed a full speed no load test on Unit 11 on May 4th for thirty minutes with no issues. Units 1, 2, and 3 were not dispatched during the month of May by PJM or by the City of Dover. Monthly Budget Variance – The actual expenses attributable to O&M of the two sites for the month of May were $435,393 against a budgeted amount of $452,325 for a favorable variance of $16,831 or 3.72%. The variance was due to: Personnel Expenses which had a favorable variance of $64,261, this was due to not having a full complement of employees for this time period. The Materials and Supplies variance was favorable for $3,349 and was due to maintenance costs lower than projected – sewer costs. The Administrative Expense variance was unfavorable for $50,779 which was due primarily to the costs of the accelerated unit start-up –up expenses for the initial site visit. June 23, 2016 Page 13

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 NAES Corporation Dover, Delaware May 2016 Monthly Report Employees Receive Awards and Work Anniversary Letters3 3Cover Photo: Plant employees for the City of Dover generation plants received awards and work anniversary letters during the month. Erik Petty received an anniversary service award, Sarah Best a Recognition Award, Debro Curtis an anniversary, and Ron McNair Recognition Award. June 23, 2016 Page 14

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 Table of Contents 1.0 Environmental, Health and Safety 2.0 Financials 3.0 Operations 4.0 Maintenance 5.0 Capital Improvement Projects (CIP 6.0 General Plant Information 7.0 Training 8.0 Calendar of Upcoming Events 9.0 “Value Added” Accomplishments during April June 23, 2016 Page 15

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 1.0 Environmental, Health and Safety During the month of May, there were no recordable accidents, lost time accidents or environmental incidents. The facility has gone 505 days through May 31, 2016 without a Lost Time Accident (LTI) and 411 days since the April 16, 2015 recordable accident. There were three (3) Near Misses reported in May 2016 at McKee Run or VanSant Generating Station. During the month of May, there were no industrial wastewater discharges to the Kent County Public Works sewer system. McKee Run submitted the monthly SIU Report to Kent County Public Works indicating no discharge or sampling occurred. During the month of May, a semi-annual sampling event occurred at McKee Run’s Outfall 001, 004, 005 and 006. The May e-DMR was submitted to DNREC indicating laboratory sample results from Outfall 001, 004, 005 and 006. No exceedances or violation are expected. Accumulated storm water inside Tank 1 containment berm was released from the normally-closed valve at Outfall 006 at the time of the semi- annual sampling. No NPDES exceedances were identified. There are no processes that discharge to the outfalls. All non-contact cooling tower blowdown water is being discharged directly to the Kent County Department of Public Works under the facilities Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit #18. 1.1 Environmental, Health and Safety Tables June 23, 2016 Page 16

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 1.2 Air Permit Fuel Operation Title V Permit Compliance McKee Run Generating Station: The Title V Permit dictates that natural gas is the primary fuel source for the unit operations and stipulates that by April 16, 2015, the boiler shall not combust oil for more than 10.0% of the average annual heat value MMbtu input during any 3 calendar years or no for more than 15% of the annual heat rate during any single calendar year. The tables below track fuel combustion operations to ensure compliance with the respective site Title V permits are maintained. Up to 48 hours can be used for “testing” purposes and gas curtailments are an allowable exception to the rule. The plant is communicating with Eastern Shore to obtain the required written confirmation of NG outages for compliance purposes. We are also and determining how many operating hours were done for “testing” which will also reduce the required natural gas to combust to be incompliance for Unit 3. June 23, 2016 Page 17

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 Van Sant Station: The Title V Air permit restrictions with regards to operations, is limited to 70,080 MW- hr. per calendar year with a rolling average* of 35,040 MW-hr. over the previous 3 calendar years. *Rolling average was not calculated because the unit generation is not close to the limit to consider this limit for the Van Sant unit with regards to the previous 3 calendar years of operations. June 23, 2016 Page 18

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 2.0 Financials Monthly and year to date financial results as compared with the approved power plant budget for the Generation Units are provided below. 2.1 Variance analysis: The actual expenses for the month of May are $435,494 against a budgeted amount of $452,325 for a favorable variance of $16,831 or 3.72%. The variance was due to the following: PERSONNEL EXPENSES – A favorable monthly variance of $64,261 was due to not having a full complement of employees for this time period. As a result, this impacted three (3) labor accounts – Straight Time, Overtime, and Labor Burdens. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES EXPENSES- A favorable monthly variance of $3,349 was due to timing of payment for computer software maintenance fees and lower than anticipated water – sewer costs. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES – An unfavorable monthly variance of $50,779 was due primarily to costs associated with the accelerated unit startup work that was not budgeted for this FY. June 23, 2016 Page 19

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 3.0 Operations Unit Operations / Outages / Trips: Team completed a full speed no load test on Unit 11 on May 4th for thirty minutes with no issues. Units 1, 2, and 3 were not dispatched during the month of May by PJM or by the City of Dover. June 23, 2016 Page 20

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 June 23, 2016 Page 21

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 3.1 Team Report: The Operations Department continues to utilize the on duty Day Shift Team to support plant Operations and general Maintenance of the plant. The Operations Team continues to support maintenance by completing Preventative Maintenance (PM) work orders and other plant related work orders utilizing their skills to successfully complete the task. The Operations Team continues to complete GPI Learning courses to improve their knowledge and skills. The GPI online training targets OSHA safety training and OSHA environmental training. Also GPI online training is utilized to completed NAES SMP (Safety & Environmental) Training; the operators review the plant’s safety and environmental permits/policies/manuals and complete a final test for knowledge of the material. 4.0 Maintenance During the month of May, the Plant Maintenance staff continued addressing the backlog of work orders, preventative maintenance (PM’s) and new work orders received during the month. Back logged Work Orders are work orders that have been open for greater than thirty days. There were 91 new work orders issued with 39 work orders being completed, and 13 of the back logged work orders completed during the month. There were 3 new Safety Work Orders entered into the plant’s Computerized Maintenance Management System (MP2) for the McKee Run site during the month and 2 were completed. The table below summarizes the monthly work order activities based on MP2 records and will continue to improve with time. This table gives a representation of identified outstanding work; Preventative Maintenance tasks completion and remaining corrective work orders and back logged work orders that require attention. June 23, 2016 Page 22

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 Notable activities during the month include: The IC&E staff and a Honeywell representative started the process of networking all of the electronic chart recorders together on Unit 3. The Honeywell representative trained the technicians how to set up the network and also how to use the Honeywell program that is required to collect data off of the recorders and export the data to different files. The networking is just about complete and up and running. This network will allow data to be view at one location and down loaded for future uses. The Maintenance and IC&E staff along with Diamond State Pole Builders constructed a building around the wet compression system. The building will protect the system from the elements and also will ensure during the winter months that the systems will not freeze and cause damage to the equipment. The Maintenance staff fabricated a roof cover over the Industrial Waste Water Pit. This coving will prevent debris from entering in the pit which could cause damage to the pumps. The IC&E technicians troubleshot an issue with the compressor bleed air valves on the combustion turbine at VanSant. This issue was found when a starting permissive for the bleed air valve would not allow the unit to start. They found a bad wire that ran from the control cab to the junction box for the compressor bleed air valves. The wires were replaced and the unit was tested with no issues from the compressor bleed air valves. The Maintenance staff installed a hand rail system around a small opening around the condenser pit area. This opening was chained off instead of a piping hand rail system. This is a safer railing system than the chain system. The Maintenance and IC&E staff returned the wet compression system back into to service after the winter layup. The system was tested for water leaks and pump operations. There were no issues with getting the system up and ready for the summer period. June 23, 2016 Page 23

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 5.0 Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) This month’s report for CIP project planned and budgeted for the current budget year 2015/2016 with the status to date for the project. June 23, 2016 Page 24

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 6.0 General Plant Information McKee Run employees celebrated work anniversary’s and received recognition awards during the month of May. Erik Petty completed 15 years of service, Sarah Best received a Recognition Award for developing a quick reference tri-fold of benefit contact numbers for employee benefits, Debro Curtis celebrated his one year work anniversary and Ron McNair received a Recognition Award for observing that the Van Sant unit was momentarily shifted to oil operation on the operational check after the exhaust plenum replacement. He ensured the operators collected an oil sample for analysis to maintain environmental compliance in accordance with our Title V Air Permit conditions avoiding what would have resulted in an NOV had the oil sample not been obtained. Lance Berryhill, Operations Supervisor, and Jacob Aucoin, Plant Engineer, attended the O&M Conference held by NAES in New Orleans, Louisiana on May 16 through May 19. William “Lance” Berryhill transitioned from Operations Supervisor to Senior Operator as of May 23, 2016. Lance will support the operation of the City of Dover facilities in his new Senior Operator position. Sarah Best completed a Budgeting and Bookkeeping seminar held at Polytech Adult Education on May 11, 2016. The class lasted for 3 weeks and was conducted several nights a week. Sarah got an in-depth look at budgeting and was involved in class budgeting projects and problem-solving. We continue to conduct interviews for the open position of IC&E Technician, and hope to have it filled soon. Negotiations for a renewed contract between NAES and IBEW Local 1238 began on May 18 and May 19, 2016. Negotiations are continuing and the next meeting is scheduled on June 6, 2015. 7.0 Training Safety Topics discussed during the May monthly safety committee meeting were reviewed by the entire staff. The monthly safety topic was on Ladder Safety “How to use a step ladder properly”; Safety doesn’t come naturally; it requires you to constantly ask questions and educate yourself. The Operating Teams continued to utilize PJM and OES-NA computer based training programs for maintaining their PJM/NERC Generation Owner Certification/Continuing Education Hours. (CEH’s). 8.0 Calendar of Upcoming Events A forecast of general event dates for the power plant projects, outages and various agency reporting dates are listed below June 23, 2016 Page 25

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 9.0 “Value Added” Accomplishments during May During the month the power plant staff accomplished the normal preventative and corrective maintenance for the generation units. We are tasked with maintaining and protecting the City of Dover power generation assets and keeping them “available” for dispatch when called. Listed below are some of the work accomplishments that have been completed this month that NAES feels added value to the generation unit assets, protected the assets from deterioration or inoperability, and overall increased the life expectancy through maintenance practices including preventative and predictive maintenance tasks (see Section 4) for the City of Dover assets. • A City building permit for the equipment shed for the inlet fogging system at the Van Sant facility was obtained at no cost. A substantial savings was realized when the staff members produced existing site drawings that were acceptable to the City Planning Department and required no additional engineering plans. This resulted in an inexpensive building permit approval without additional engineering costs for detail site layout. • The Inlet Fogging Shed was erected at the Van Sant site, City of Dover NAES employees completed the footing and building foundation excavation for the Diamond State building contractor to approve the building construction. The staff also purchased all the required building insulation, electrical conduit, wiring and space heater(s) for the building which will be installed over the next couple of months. This work and activity on the part of the staff reduced the contractor cost for the project providing additional cost savings to the City. • A Nitrogen generator was purchased to reduce the costs of nitrogen use on the McKee Run site. The nitrogen generator was purchased form funds in the 2015- June 23, 2016 Page 26

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 IV. APPENDIX: PJM INVOICE REPORT NAME: Monthly Billing Statement - CSV and XML CUSTOMER ACCOUNT: City of Dover, Delaware CUSTOMER CODE: DOVDE CUSTOMER ID: 76.000000 FINAL BILLING STATEMENT ISSUED: 6/7/2016 9:02 BILLING PERIOD START DATE: 5/1/2016 BILLING PERIOD END DATE: 5/31/2016 INVOICE NUMBER: 2016053100076.000000 INVOICE DUE DATE: 6/10/2016 12:00 SOURCE BILLING PERIOD CHARGES ADJ BILLING LINE ITEM NAME START AMOUNT ($) 1100.000000 Network Integration Transmission Service 342573.250000 1108.000000 Transmission Enhancement 52788.080000 1130.000000 Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service 0.000000 1140.000000 Non-Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service 0.000000 1200.000000 Day-ahead Spot Market Energy 255339.120000 1205.000000 Balancing Spot Market Energy 25639.180000 1210.000000 Day-ahead Transmission Congestion -214149.610000 1215.000000 Balancing Transmission Congestion -96.350000 1220.000000 Day-ahead Transmission Losses -4778.070000 1225.000000 Balancing Transmission Losses 617.540000 1230.000000 Inadvertent Interchange -291.940000 1242.000000 Day-Ahead Load Response Charge Allocation 51.420000 1243.000000 Real-Time Load Response Charge Allocation 102.330000 1250.000000 Meter Error Correction -2340.080000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1301.000000 Service - Control Area Administration 9652.540000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1302.000000 Service - FTR Administration 39.680000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1303.000000 Service - Market Support 2215.960000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1304.000000 Service - Regulation Market Administration 86.660000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1305.000000 Service - Capacity Resource/Obligation Mgmt. 936.820000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1306.000000 Service - Advanced Second Control Center 1145.540000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1307.000000 Service - Market Support Offset -193.950000 1313.000000 PJM Settlement, Inc. 193.950000 1314.000000 Market Monitoring Unit (MMU) Funding 332.050000 1315.000000 FERC Annual Recovery 3713.820000 1316.000000 Organization of PJM States, Inc. (OPSI) Funding 39.940000 North American Electric Reliability Corporation 1317.000000 (NERC) 701.670000 1318.000000 Reliability First Corporation (RFC) 1146.660000 Transmission Owner Scheduling, System Control 1320.000000 and Dispatch Service 4238.650000 Reactive Supply and Voltage Control from 1330.000000 Generation and Other Sources Service 30611.790000 1340.000000 Regulation and Frequency Response Service 6974.280000 June 23, 2016 Page 27

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 1360.000000 Synchronized Reserve 3435.280000 1362.000000 Non-Synchronized Reserve 304.410000 1365.000000 Day-ahead Scheduling Reserve 473.750000 1370.000000 Day-ahead Operating Reserve 2548.660000 1375.000000 Balancing Operating Reserve 1408.540000 1376.000000 Balancing Operating Reserve for Load Response -0.060000 1378.000000 Reactive Services 3458.160000 1380.000000 Black Start Service 2567.930000 1400.000000 Load Reconciliation for Spot Market Energy 288.060000 1410.000000 Load Reconciliation for Transmission Congestion -81.360000 1420.000000 Load Reconciliation for Transmission Losses -1.820000 1430.000000 Load Reconciliation for Inadvertent Interchange 0.180000 Load Reconciliation for PJM Scheduling, System 1440.000000 Control and Dispatch Service 1.940000 Load Reconciliation for Schedule 9-6 - Advanced 1442.000000 Second Control Center 0.270000 Load Reconciliation for Market Monitoring Unit 1444.000000 (MMU) Funding 0.050000 1445.000000 Load Reconciliation for FERC Annual Recovery 0.610000 Load Reconciliation for Organization of PJM 1446.000000 States, Inc. (OPSI) Funding 0.010000 Load Reconciliation for North American Electric 1447.000000 Reliability Corporation (NERC) 0.120000 Load Reconciliation for Reliability First Corporation 1448.000000 (RFC) 0.190000 Load Reconciliation for Transmission Owner 1450.000000 Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch Service 0.700000 Load Reconciliation for Regulation and Frequency 1460.000000 Response Service 1.590000 1470.000000 Load Reconciliation for Synchronized Reserve 0.290000 Load Reconciliation for Non-Synchronized 1472.000000 Reserve 0.090000 Load Reconciliation for Day-ahead Scheduling 1475.000000 Reserve 0.030000 Load Reconciliation for Balancing Operating 1478.000000 Reserve 0.240000 1490.000000 Load Reconciliation for Reactive Services -0.650000 1500.000000 Financial Transmission Rights Auction -87032.190000 1600.000000 RPM Auction 6324.930000 1610.000000 Locational Reliability 904154.060000 1932.000000 Generation Deactivation Refund -343.230000 1108.000000 A Transmission Enhancement 1/1/2016 79.870000 1108.000000 A Transmission Enhancement 2/1/2016 79.870000 1108.000000 A Transmission Enhancement 3/1/2016 79.870000 1108.000000 A Transmission Enhancement 4/1/2016 79.870000 1250.000000 A Meter Error Correction 4/1/2016 -963.520000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1304.000000 A Service - Regulation Market Administration 4/1/2014 -0.010000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1304.000000 A Service - Regulation Market Administration 5/1/2014 0.020000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1304.000000 A Service - Regulation Market Administration 6/1/2014 0.010000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1304.000000 A Service - Regulation Market Administration 7/1/2014 0.010000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1304.000000 A Service - Regulation Market Administration 8/1/2014 -0.010000 PJM Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch 1304.000000 A Service - Regulation Market Administration 9/1/2014 0.030000 June 23, 2016 Page 28

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 Reactive Supply and Voltage Control from 1330.000000 A Generation and Other Sources Service 3/1/2014 -2.870000 1340.000000 A Regulation and Frequency Response Service 4/1/2014 -0.080000 1340.000000 A Regulation and Frequency Response Service 5/1/2014 11.350000 1340.000000 A Regulation and Frequency Response Service 6/1/2014 -2.480000 1340.000000 A Regulation and Frequency Response Service 7/1/2014 0.600000 1340.000000 A Regulation and Frequency Response Service 8/1/2014 1.320000 1340.000000 A Regulation and Frequency Response Service 9/1/2014 2.290000 1340.000000 A Regulation and Frequency Response Service 4/1/2016 -0.190000 1360.000000 A Synchronized Reserve 6/1/2014 -84.500000 1360.000000 A Synchronized Reserve 12/1/2015 27.400000 1360.000000 A Synchronized Reserve 4/1/2016 1.850000 1375.000000 A Balancing Operating Reserve 1/1/2014 601.600000 1375.000000 A Balancing Operating Reserve 8/1/2014 -0.940000 1375.000000 A Balancing Operating Reserve 9/1/2015 600.610000 1375.000000 A Balancing Operating Reserve 10/1/2015 -50.030000 1375.000000 A Balancing Operating Reserve 11/1/2015 -43.580000 1375.000000 A Balancing Operating Reserve 12/1/2015 -9.820000 1375.000000 A Balancing Operating Reserve 1/1/2016 -23.510000 1375.000000 A Balancing Operating Reserve 2/1/2016 95.280000 1375.000000 A Balancing Operating Reserve 3/1/2016 31.510000 1375.000000 A Balancing Operating Reserve 4/1/2016 20.880000 Michigan - Ontario Interface Phase Angle 1911.000000 A Regulators 4/1/2016 173.700000 Total Charges 1355508.110000 SOURCE BILLING PERIOD CREDITS ADJ BILLING LINE ITEM NAME START AMOUNT ($) 2100.000000 Network Integration Transmission Service 0.000000 2108.000000 Transmission Enhancement 39659.000000 2130.000000 Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service 0.000000 2140.000000 Non-Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service 407.420000 2210.000000 Transmission Congestion -56882.750000 2220.000000 Transmission Losses 9963.530000 Transmission Owner Scheduling, System Control 2320.000000 and Dispatch Service 0.000000 Reactive Supply and Voltage Control from 2330.000000 Generation and Other Sources Service 29388.000000 2340.000000 Regulation and Frequency Response Service 0.000000 2360.000000 Synchronized Reserve 0.000000 2365.000000 Day-ahead Scheduling Reserve 0.000000 2370.000000 Day-ahead Operating Reserve 0.000000 2375.000000 Balancing Operating Reserve 0.000000 2380.000000 Black Start Service 0.000000 2420.000000 Load Reconciliation for Transmission Losses 3.750000 2510.000000 Auction Revenue Rights 76153.980000 2600.000000 RPM Auction 908470.500000 2630.000000 Capacity Transfer Rights 2192.010000 2640.000000 Incremental Capacity Transfer Rights 264.430000 2661.000000 Capacity Resource Deficiency 2095.290000 2666.000000 Load Management Test Failure 539.430000 2140.000000 A Non-Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service 4/1/2016 40.990000 Reactive Supply and Voltage Control from 2330.000000 A Generation and Other Sources Service 3/1/2014 -79.580000 2375.000000 A Balancing Operating Reserve 9/1/2015 5307.200000 June 23, 2016 Page 29

Monthly Management Committee Update April 2016 2661.000000 A Capacity Resource Deficiency 8/1/2014 436.800000 2661.000000 A Capacity Resource Deficiency 9/1/2014 117.600000 Total Credits 1018077.600000 Monthly Billing Net Total 337430.510000 Previous Weekly Billing Net Total 158952.740000 Total Due / Receivable 178477.770000 End of Report June 23, 2016 Page 30

City Planner’s Monthly Report Planning, Inspections & Recreation MAY 2016 Planning, Inspections & Recreation Highlights  May celebrated as National Bicycle Month—The Bicycle/Pedestrian Subcom- mittee with their partners offered a couple of options for celebrating the American League of Bicyclists, Bike Month. Bike To Work Day on May 18th was a little less at- tended than we had hoped for, but the Ride of Silence that evening exceeded last year’s participants with more than 30 riders. New, we partnered with the DelDOT Bicycle sec- tion to offer a Fun Ride, May 26th that took riders from The Green out and back from Route10 using the Isaac's Branch and Capital City Trails. We purchased and displayed a new banner across Governors Avenue promoting bike month. We’ll be hosting the Fun Ride again on June 23, July 28 and August 25, so there’s plenty of time to get your bikes ready to join us for a future date.  Concerts on The Green— We’ve kicked off the 40th Annual Season of the Spr ing & Summer Performing Arts on The Green. With sponsorships from Eden Hill Medical Group, Chesapeake Utilities and YMCA of Dover, we have scheduled 16 weeks of family entertainment. We have some new acts such as Evolution Orange and our regular favorites such as the Honeycombs and Reptile World. Join us Thursday nights at 7 pm, for an even- ing of relaxing and good entertainment.  Keller Williams Day of Giving / Code Purple —The John W. Pitts Recreation was quite the busy place on May 12 as Keller Williams and Code Purple partnered to offer a Day of Giving. Both organizations proudly pulled together to offer clothing, food, outdoor sup- plies, hygiene products, diapers and more to our community members in need. These or- ganizations are a big part of making Dover a place where people want to live, work, and play while helping those less fortunate.  Annexation - Over 250 acres of land owned by Dover International Speedway Inc. was annexed into the City of Dover on May 9, 2016; this is the largest land annexation since the 2006 annexation of the Lands of Carey which became the new Dover High School. The land annexed is located east of State Route 1 in the vicinity of Leipsic Road and Per- simmon Tree Lane and also includes the property at 1229 Persimmon Tree Lane. (Application AX-16-03) This annexation brings The Woodlands area (festival lands) into one jurisdiction.

PROGRESS IN PICTURES Duplex at Seskinore Development Garrison Energy Center Booker T Washington School

Planning, Inspections & Recreation Revenue FY '16 Budget FY '16 Actual Revenue Stream Looking Forward Business License $1,425,000 $ 1,473,314 100% Trailer License $21,000 $ 20,122 96%  End of Fiscal Year Building Permits $600,000 $ 528,089 88% FY2016 Cert. of Occupancy $6,500 $ 10,540 162%  Report on Firefly Music Public Occupancy $9,700 $ 22,506 232% Festival Lodging House $14,100 $ 13,666 97%  Plan 4 Health Charette Plumbing/Heating/Air $75,000 $ 83,619 111% Rental Inspection Fee $350,000 $ 395,370 113% Miscellaneous $15,000 $ 40,815 272% Fire Protection Fees $62,000 $ 66,513 107% Code Enf. Fines $25,000 $ 41,525 Vacant Building Reg. $100,000 $ 193,567 194% Total P&I Revenue $2,703,300 $ 2,889,645 105% Recreation $149,800 $ 161,378 108% PERSONNEL AND TRAINING  On May 13, 2016 Ann Marie Townshend attended Ethics training in Harris- burg, PA.  On May 25-26, 2016 Matthew Brown and Jason Osika attended NFPA and DELJIS training at the Silver Lake Plaza in Dover, Delaware. PLANNING OFFICE The Planning Office is part of the review process for certain types of construc- tion activity permits (Building Permits, Sign Permits, etc.) and Certificate of Oc- cupancy permits. For May 2016, Planning Staff was involved with review of 109 Permits and 11 Certificates of Occupancy permits. (2016 calendar year total of 328 Permits and CO’s compared to 374 for 2015). Thus Permit activity is up when compared to previous years. Planning Staff also reviews new applications for Business Licenses and Rental Dwelling Permits.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Planning Staff continues to focus on the various implementation items identified in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as amended.  The Planning Office is also involved in the following studies and projects: Manufac- tured Housing, Restoring Central Dover Community Plan implementation, Transporta- tion Improvement Districts, and the Division Street/Forest Street Design Week Char- rette.  The Planning Office began utilization of the mobile GIS application for data collection in for the study of “Non-conforming Uses” including use of a mobile GIS application for data collection to identify non-compliant uses.  Ordinance Adopted: The Text Amendment to Zoning Ordinance, Article 6 Section 5.3 regarding the parking regulations for multiple dwellings was adopted by City Council on May 9, 2016 (Ordinance #2016-14). Construction Activity  Construction activities continue at several multi-family residential projects. These include the Leander Lakes Apartments project south of Forrest Avenue/Route 8 (S-12-18), the re- development of Walker Woods as the Village of McKee Branch (S-13-18), and the re-start of construction at the Tall Pines project at 1655 and 1665 Kenton Road (S-14-18) and this first building of Phase 2 at the Blue Hen Apartments Complex. There are also residential construction activity in Clearview Meadows PND, Nottingham Meadows, Senators Lake, Village of Westover Phase VI, and Village of Cannon Mill.  Construction activities began for the renovations of the building at 515 North DuPont Highway (old Kmart location) consisting of the tenant fit-outs for Burlington and Big Lots. A series of site improvements including parking lot reconfiguration, entrance recon- figuration, sidewalks/multi-use paths, and landscaping will also occur under Site Plan S- 16-02.  Construction activities also began at the Kraft-Heinz facility for a new breadcrumb pro- duction line and for a new office building at Creekstone Development on South Governors Avenue (S-15-14). MAY 16 TOTAL FOR 2016 New Home Permits Issued 20 33 Value of Commercial Projects $8,059,305.00 $15,653,370.00 Downtown Incentives (Fees $207.00 $2,172.00 Waived)

BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTIVITY Planning Commission The Planning Commission met on May 16, 2016. The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for June 20, 2016. The following applications were considered:  S-16-12 Parking Lot at 1 South Bradford Street – Commission granted approval of a Site Plan to permit the construction of a 3,830 S.F. parking lot containing thirteen (13) parking spaces at the rear of the existing building on site.  MI-16-05 Text Amendments: Speed Bumps, Speed Cushions, and Speed Humps — Com- mission moved to recommend to City Council denial of the proposed Text Amendments regarding Speed Bumps, Speed Cushions and Speed Humps as written but to re-visit the need and the language if there is a thought that these are a necessary item to allow. These proposed Ordinance revisions would create definitions for speed bumps, speed cushions, and speed humps and allow speed cushions to be installed on private commer- cial property following review by the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee and approval by City Council. Speed bumps and speed humps would remain prohibited. Ordi- nance #2016-09. Board of Adjustment The Board of Adjustment met on May 18, 2016. The next regular scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment is scheduled for June 15, 2016. The following applications were consid- ered:  V-16-04 131 Nob Hill Road: Wayne S. Lipscomb—The Board moved to approve variance V-16-04 from the requirements of Zoning Ordinance, Article 4 §4.1 pertaining to required off-street parking in the R-8 (One –Family Residence Zone) and as it relates to Zoning Ordi- nance, Article 6 §3.2 stipulating how areas for parking are computed.  V-16-05 385 Saulsbury Road: Family Dental Associates c/o Christoper A. Nacrelli—The Board moved to defer action because a representative was not present. Historic District Commission The Historic District Commission met on May 19, 2016. The next Historic District Commis- sion meeting is scheduled for June 19, 2016. The following application was considered:  HI-16-04 Sign Permit #16-611: Signage for The Depot at 595 Forest Street - The Commis- sion granted approval for an Architectural Review Certification for placement of a wall sign including a LED electronic message center.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CDBG FY15 Projects Homeownership Assistance Program CDBG funds will be used to provide homeownership assistance to first-time homebuyers who purchase affordable housing in the Downtown Development District (DDD) Target Area. One (1) family pur- chased a property in the DDD Target Area and one family is pending approval to purchase a newly con- structed home on the corner of Mary and West Streets. Dover Interfaith Mission for Housing CDBG funds will be used for operations cost for the shelter. This project is currently underway with 90% of program funds spent year to date. Connections Community Support Program CDBG funds will be used to provide rapid re-housing/rental assistance services for homeless households within the City. Rental assistance was provided for two (2) low income persons. Milford Housing Homeowner Rehabilitation Program CDBG funds will be used to rehabilitate existing owner occupied housing in the City that is in violation of the City’s Housing Code and complete emergency home repairs to eliminate housing conditions that threaten the health and safety of low income homeowners. Emergency home repairs were completed for five (5) low income households and homeowner rehabs for three (3) low income families. Habitat for Humanity CDBG funds will be used to rehabilitate an existing home to provide affordable housing to a family in the Downtown Development District Target Area. Habitat for Humanity purchased 111 S. Queen Street on November 2, 2015, renovated the property, and sold the property on December 18, 2015 to a first time homebuyer. Remainder of the funding was utilized for asbestos removal for properties in the DDD Tar- get Area that will be renovated and sold to low income families. Peoples Place Whatcoat Homeless Shelter CDBG funds will be utilized for minor renovations to a facility that shelters the homeless. This Project is completed. Neighborhood Stabilization Program Settlement assistance was provided for three (3) families who purchased affordable housing in the City of Dover and was able to assist in stabilizing our neighborhoods by purchasing properties that have been vacant for at least 90 days or foreclosed. The following properties were purchased providing NSP settle- ment assistance:  40 Spruance Road  310 Crickle Creek Lane  155 Periwinkle Drive

Code Enforcement Activity—MAY Case Type # cases current # cases % staff initiated % staff initiated month YTD current month YTD No valid Rental Permit 72 79 98% 99% No valid Building Permit 2 25 95% 98% Tall grass and weeds 122 289 88% 94% Unregistered vehicle 5 16 78% 55% Abandoned vehicle 2 22 100% 80% Annual Housing Inspection 23 94 74% 77% Property Maintenance – 33 190 67% 79% Exterior Electric Termination 8 55 88% 95% Dover Code of Ordinances 36 229 69% 85% Zoning 1 22 100% 77% Total Cases 304 1021 Total # of Inspections For 324 Month 200 North West Street-Dangerous Building House at 139 Mitscher Road—Dangerous Building

Dangerous Buildings, Vacant Buildings & Demolitions  35 N. Queen Street—Property is condemned and a lien search is complete; home has been placed on the market for sale. An adjacent land owner has inquired about purchasing the property and demolishing the structure; they currently are in contact with City Staff.  2 S. Queen Street—Property was brought forward to City Council on December 9th as a dangerous building. Council declared that the owner would have 15 days to submit a con- tractor’s plan for renovations to City Staff and to place the issue back on the City Council agenda for January 11, 216, for further review. Council has ordered that the home be de- molished by February 11, 2016. The demolition of the structure has been delayed.  53 S. New Street—A fire occurred within this residence on January 14, 2016. City Staff scheduled an emergency hearing for Dover Council on January 25, 2016, where City Council declared the structure dangerous and ordered it demolished or repaired by Febru- ary 10, 2016. The property has been sold and the new owners have advised that they are going to demolish the structure and build a new home on the site.  113 Davis Circle—Property is condemned and a lien search has been requested.  133 Sweetgum Drive—Property was condemned due to fire damage.  234 N. Kirkwood Street—Property was condemned when the Dover Police Department discovered that a meth lab was being operated in a vacant home.  200 N. West Street—A Demolition Permit was submitted by the new owners of the proper- ty and was approved.  528 Bay Road—Commercial property is condemned and will be going to City Council in August as City Staff will request permission to have the structure demolished.  139 Mitscher Road—This property was condemned in July of 2015 as unfit for habitation. City Staff had scheduled it to go to City Council on August 24, 2015, to request permis- sion to have the structure demolished, but the property sold and the new owner obtained permits for renovations. Since that date, minimal work has been performed and City Staff will be taking this to City Council in August to request permission to have the home de- molished.  Vacant Buildings—During the month of May, twenty six (26) additional buildings were registered as vacant, and $4,375.00 in vacant building registration fees were collected.

Fire Marshal’s Office, Building Inspections & Licensing Summary LIFE SAFETY Current July15-June16 May 2015 July14-June15 Inspections MAY 16 FYTD 16 MAY 15 FYTD 15 Annual Fire/Life Safety Inspections 22 312 35 403 Fire/Code/DCO Complaints 20 328 30 478 Inspection Deficiencies from AFI 84 1197 73 983 C/O & Acceptance Tests 25 166 27 118 Administrative Walk Thru 12 124 19 106 Plan Review 6 102 9 - Accidental $500.00 $315,000 $16,100 $421,000 Incendiary $250.00 $17,716 $ 0.00 $73,600 Undetermined $220,000 $446,950 $0.00 $22,900 PERMITTING AND LICENSING Permits Issued MAY 16 FYTD 16 MAY 15 FYTD 15 Administrative Permit 5 47 7 25 Building Addition/Renovation Permits 44 327 31 379 Building Permits 37 142 31 184 Demolition Permits 2 52 4 47 Fence Permits 21 97 15 85 Fire Prevention Permits 4 104 13 90 Mechanical Permits 35 379 30 274 Plumbing Permits 19 360 32 259 Sign Permits 27 232 32 233 Swimming Pool Permits 2 5 0 9 Business Licenses 66 1290 84 1066 Merchant Licenses 1 283 2 208 Contractor Licenses 26 903 30 654 Lodging House Licenses 0 42 0 55 Mobile Homes 1 271 5 303 Public Occupancy 33 379 6 399 Rental Dwelling 92 352 69 3521 BUILDING INSPECTIONS Inspections MAY 16 FYTD 16 MAY 15 FYTD 15 Building 280 3370 367 3522 Plumbing/Mechanical 326 3492 325 3082 Certificate of Occupancy 11 153 17 152

Fire Marshal’s Office—At a Glance The Fire Marshal’s Office investigated a total of six (6) incidents in the month of May, to include a fire at 133 Sweetgum Drive which resulted in a large fire loss. In a separate incident, a subject received burns to over 50% of their body. During the month of May, the Fire Marshal’s Office conducted several inspections and acceptance tests. The Office also worked to ensure safety of the citizens and visitors in the lots utilized for the Dover Interna- tional Speedway NASCAR race events. Recreation Division Enrollment Summary MAY FY 16 verses MAY FY 15 500 400 FY15 300 FY16 200 100 0 Ge n Rec Sports Trips Leagues Camps Category FY15 FY16 General Recreation 166 184 Sports 63 74 Trips 0 0 Leagues 423 255 Camps 0 0

Revenue Breakdown: May 2016 verses May 2015 General Recreation General Recreation Sports Sports Trips Trips Leagues Leagues Building & Field Rentals Building & Field Rentals Camps Camps Youth Connections/CSW Youth Connections/CSW General Recreation $2,988.50 General Recreation $2,668.63 Sports $420.00 Sports $360.00 Trips $333.00 Trips 0.00 Leagues $14,430.00 Leagues $17,260.00 Building & Field Rentals $1,050.00 Building & Field Rentals $1,125.00 Camps $3,840.00 Camps $1,135.00 Youth Connections/CSW $17,753.00 Youth Connections/CSW $13,040.00

John W. Pitts Recreation Center – MAY 2016 Total Program Attendance Facility Usage By The Hour 20,000 1,000 15,000 800 600 10,000 400 5,000 200 0 May 15 0 May 15 June 15 July 15 Aug 15 June 15 July 15 Aug 15 Sept 15 Oct 15 Nov 15 Sept 15 Oct 15 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16 Apr 16 May 16 Mar 16 Apr 16 May 16 ** Program Attendance figures includes daily participants, parents and spectators in the facility. Facility Usage By The Hour MAY 16 FYTD 16 MAY 15 FYTD 15 Open Gym 477 4,105.25 480 4,389.5 Fitness Classes 28 372.5 28 424 Leagues 41.5 1,174 32 862.5 Camps 0 998 0 764 Sports Classes 12 160.5 9 245 Meetings & Rentals 35 267 15.5 364 Enrichment Classes 2 27 2 14 Total Facility Usage Hours 595.5 7,104.25 566.5 7,063 Daily Program Attendance** MAY 16 FYTD 16 MAY 15 FYTD 15 Total 1,632 56,940 1,449 53,349 Open Gym 478 4,170 449 5,758 Fitness Classes 143 2,116 262 2,958 Leagues 576 44,508 550 32,458 Camps 0 1,231 0 1,185 Sports Classes 95 2,126 87 2,339 Meetings & Rentals 332 2,656 91 8,596 Enrichment Classes 8 133 10 55 Since our opening in late April 2008, we have had 441,835 guests at the John W. Pitts Recreation Center. May Open Gym Registrations and Packages Sold Packages Sold: MAY MTD YTD FYTD Daily: 18 $54 142 $426 Individual Quarterly: 0 $0 9 $135 Individual Annual: 0 $0 0 $0 Family Quarterly: 0 $0 0 $0 Family Annual: 0 $0_ 0 __ $0_ Revenue: 18 $54 151 $661

CITY OF DOVER FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY DEPARTMENTS MAY 2016 - MONTHLY BUDGET REPORTS PLEASE NOTE – THIS REPORT PROVIDES TOP LINE INFORMATION ON THE OPERATING FUNDS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT.

CITY OF DOVER ACTIVITY REPORTS MAY 2016 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY LEVELS FY15 YTD FY16 YTD BANK TRENDS Number of Deposits Made (Hand, ACH & Wire, Lockbox) 6,442 6,532 Total Amount of All Deposits $ 124,809,340 $ 119,295,349 PAYROLL Hours % Amount Hours % Amount Gross wages per registers 798,918 100.0% $ 18,970,835 825,303 100.0% $ 20,029,533 Wages and Hours Worked Regular 655,348 82.0% $ 14,528,571 681,709 82.6% $ 15,311,794 All over time 31,170 3.9% $ 1,264,645 32,250 3.9% $ 1,397,411 Other Paid or Unpaid Wages and Hours Vacation 40,480 5.1% $ 1,080,710 38,317 4.6% $ 1,064,745 Sick 17,290 2.2% $ 437,294 14,987 1.8% $ 378,829 Terminal Leave - Retiree Vacation/Sick Payout 20,920 2.6% $ 675,888 16,976 2.1% $ 554,213 Comp Time 8,281 1.0% $ 239,578 6,953 0.8% $ 209,181 Personal 1,809 0.2% $ 54,560 2,996 0.4% $ 98,399 Leave Without Pay 3,281 0.4% $ - 2,665 0.3% $ - Other (description below) 20,351 2.5% $ 689,588 28,451 3.4% $ 1,019,890 Other includes: pay adjustments, military differential pay, training, committee meetings, worker compensation tracking/adjustments, etc. Other Activity Number of Pay Periods 24 24 Number of Payroll Checks & Direct Deposits Issued 8,850 9,342 Number of Pension Checks Issued 2,786 2,790 Total Pension Benefits Paid - Defined Benefit Plan $ 4,779,076 $ 4,787,288 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Number of Check Vouchers 5,395 5,693 Number of EFT Vouchers 2,214 2,376 Vouchers Dollar Amount Disbursed $ 74,617,869 $ 66,896,095 PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY ACTIVITY LEVELS Contingency & Warehouse Stock 3,500,000 1435 3,000,000 1430 2,500,000 1425 2,000,000 1420 Total Dollar Value 1,500,000 1415 Total Line Items 1,000,000 1410 500,000 1405 0 1400 Value: $2,676,709.26 Line Items: 1,412 Fuel Use Unleaded: 11,379.7 gallons Diesel: 5,903.1 gallons Total Cost: $ 27,355.86 2

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report - May 2016 General Fund Summary Revised 92% Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 3,977,500 $ 4,820,400 $ 4,820,414 $ (14) 100.0% Revenues Court of Chancery Fees 1,065,100 1,090,400 1,017,860 72,540 93.3% Police Extra Duty, Fines & Revenue 1,235,300 1,112,900 884,439 228,461 79.5% Franchise Fees 672,300 682,300 510,633 171,667 74.8% Grants 623,500 623,500 212,333 411,167 34.1% Intrafund Services 5,231,200 5,006,900 4,540,749 466,151 90.7% Library & Recreation Revenues 671,000 528,600 576,596 (47,996) 109.1% Licenses & Permits 2,861,300 2,908,300 3,124,536 (216,236) 107.4% Property Taxes (Includes BID Revenue) (1) 12,894,200 12,833,500 12,837,936 (4,436) 100.0% Miscellaneous Revenues 57,700 196,600 210,384 (13,784) 107.0% Sanitation Revenues 2,580,000 2,530,000 2,318,662 211,338 91.6% Other Miscellaneous Revenues - 0.0% Garrison Farm Rent Revenue 93,700 93,900 93,858 42 100.0% Transfers-In from Special Funds & Utilities Municipal Street Aid Fund 564,200 673,100 673,345 (245) 100.0% Civil Traffic Penalties 450,000 480,000 412,347 67,653 85.9% Transfer Taxes 1,340,000 2,090,200 2,077,795 12,405 99.4% Verizon & Other Reserves 63,200 63,200 50,000 13,200 79.1% Police Grants/Extra Duty 74,400 172,700 126,879 45,821 73.5% Water/Wastewater Fund 850,000 850,000 850,000 - 100.0% Electric Fund 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 - 100.0% Total Revenues 41,327,100 41,936,100 40,518,352 1,417,748 96.6% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 45,304,600 $ 46,756,500 $ 45,338,766 $ 1,417,734 97.0% Expenditures City Clerk & Council $ 501,500 $ 496,400 $ 412,967 $ 83,433 83.2% Mayor, City Manager & Human Resources 1,210,300 1,363,400 1,226,706 136,694 90.0% Police & Police Extra Duty 15,761,400 16,557,500 14,648,068 1,909,432 88.5% Public Services 4,669,500 4,522,900 3,843,444 679,456 85.0% Engineering 181,400 173,400 142,867 30,533 82.4% Procurement & Inventory, Facilities Mgmt., Fleet Maint. 2,036,200 2,022,500 1,781,761 240,739 88.1% Planning, Inspections, Life Safety, Code Enf., & Economic Dev. 2,338,300 2,419,300 2,111,850 307,450 87.3% Finance, Info Tech & Customer Services 2,803,400 2,698,900 2,351,865 347,035 87.1% Library & Recreation 2,239,500 2,179,200 1,889,198 290,002 86.7% Fire Department 745,400 735,400 651,731 83,669 88.6% Assessor 234,800 239,800 213,167 26,633 88.9% Contribution to DDP 70,000 70,000 52,500 17,500 75.0% Miscellaneous Grant Expense 25,000 25,000 - 25,000 0.0% Other Employment Expenses 520,100 47,300 - 47,300 0.0% Bank & CC Fees 15,000 10,600 7,016 3,584 66.2% Insurance 690,000 690,000 680,148 9,852 98.6% New Street Property Acquisitions - 240,400 240,362 38 100.0% OPEB - Retiree’s Health Care Contribution 1,895,600 1,567,700 1,150,987 416,713 73.4% Police Pension Trust Contribution - State Grant 500,000 500,000 203,400 296,600 40.7% Appropriation to Employee Pension Fund - 594,300 594,300 - 100.0% Appropriation to Police Pension Fund 570,000 676,500 431,813 244,687 63.8% Street Lights 797,700 797,700 735,755 61,945 92.2% Debt Service 660,800 669,400 635,726 33,674 95.0% Transfers Out Capital Asset Reserve - 229,600 229,600 - 100.0% Inventory Write-offs 10,000 10,000 10,000 - 100.0% Capital Projects Fund 2,625,400 2,625,400 1,969,050 656,350 75.0% Verizon Reserve 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 100.0% Uncollectibles: Trash & Other 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 100.0% Total Expenditures 41,201,300 42,262,600 36,314,281 5,948,319 85.9% Budget Balance -Working Capital 4,103,300 4,493,900 - 4,493,900 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenditures $ 45,304,600 $ 46,756,500 $ 36,314,281 $ 10,442,219 77.7% Reserve Balances Contingency $ 720,300 $ 731,000 $ 731,866 (1) Property Taxes are the taxes billed and not cash received. The outstanding receivable balance as of 5/31/16 is $122,437 as compared to $205,226 in May 2015. 3

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report - May 2016 Water/Wastewater Fund Summary Revised 92% Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Water $ 861,600 $ 1,072,900 $ 1,072,915 $ (15) 100.0% Beginning Balance - Wastewater 293,400 206,900 206,894 6 100.0% 1,155,000 1,279,800 1,279,809 (9) 100.0% Revenues Water Fees 6,200,000 5,366,600 4,970,573 396,027 92.6% Wastewater Fees 3,728,000 3,823,800 3,438,946 384,854 89.9% Wastewater Treatment Services 3,026,500 2,997,600 2,697,205 300,395 90.0% Groundwater Inflow Adjustment 1,864,300 1,965,600 1,724,680 240,920 87.7% Water Tank Space Leases 341,900 341,900 298,507 43,393 87.3% Miscellaneous Service Fee 67,000 66,200 71,573 (5,373) 108.1% Impact Fees - Water 250,000 222,400 202,330 20,070 91.0% Impact Fees - Wastewater 250,000 253,400 175,216 78,184 69.1% Total Revenues 15,727,700 15,037,500 13,579,030 1,458,470 90.3% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 16,882,700 $ 16,317,300 $ 14,858,839 $ 1,458,461 91.1% Expenses Water/Wastewater Operating Divisions Engineering & Inspection $ 517,500 $ 512,500 $ 438,871 $ 73,629 85.6% Water Department 673,300 650,900 563,491 87,409 86.6% Water Treatment Plant 1,910,000 1,743,100 1,469,721 273,379 84.3% Wastewater Department 968,600 840,600 698,403 142,197 83.1% Kent County Treatment Charge 4,130,000 4,130,000 3,569,901 560,099 86.4% Intrafund Service Fees 1,492,700 1,420,200 1,264,747 155,453 89.1% Retiree's Health Care 178,600 60,200 60,200 - 100.0% Debt Service 1,132,100 1,132,400 1,089,700 42,700 96.2% Other Employment Expenses 20,000 142,300 - 142,300 0.0% Bank & CC Fees 46,200 25,000 21,314 3,686 85.3% Transfers Out General Fund 850,000 850,000 850,000 - 100.0% Contingency Reserve 32,000 32,000 - 32,000 0.0% Appropriation to Pension Fund - 248,400 248,400 - 100.0% Water I & E Fund 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,350,000 450,000 75.0% Wastewater I & E Fund 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,125,000 375,000 75.0% Total Expenses 15,251,000 15,087,600 12,749,748 2,337,852 84.5% Budget Balances Budget Balance - Work. Cap Water 1,048,600 566,500 - 566,500 0.0% Budget Balance - Work. Cap WW 583,100 663,200 - 663,200 0.0% Total Budget Balances 1,631,700 1,229,700 - 1,229,700 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 16,882,700 $ 16,317,300 $ 12,749,748 $ 3,567,552 78.1% Reserve Balances Contingency-Water $ 137,700 $ 138,000 $ 106,873 Contingency-Wastewater $ 191,100 $ 191,600 $ 193,254 Impact Fee Reserve - Water $ 202,000 $ 430,700 $ 433,584 Impact Fee Reserve - Sewer $ 1,309,500 $ 1,590,900 $ 1,745,109 Bond Coverage Ratio (Covenant 1.20) 4.30 4.30 4.34 4

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report - May 2016 Electric Revenue Fund Summary Revised 92% Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 6,177,600 $ 8,337,500 $ 8,337,466 $ 34 100.0% Revenues Direct Sales to Customers 78,279,200 78,493,800 71,448,153 7,045,647 91.0% Utility Tax 1,281,100 1,309,600 1,198,516 111,084 91.5% Weyandt Hall Rents 202,600 202,600 226,649 (24,049) 111.9% Miscellaneous Revenues 725,200 1,039,400 912,774 126,626 87.8% Interest Earnings 47,900 35,000 43,138 (8,138) 123.3% Transfer from Rate Stabilization 3,000,000 750,000 750,000 - 100.0% Total Revenues 83,536,000 81,830,400 74,579,230 7,251,170 91.1% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 89,713,600 $ 90,167,900 $ 82,916,696 $ 7,251,204 92.0% Expenses Power Supply & Generation Hedged Energy $ 23,402,600 $ 23,402,600 $ 21,555,272 $ 1,847,328 92.1% Power Supply Management 996,000 996,000 913,000 83,000 91.7% Capacity Charges 10,225,100 10,225,100 9,711,459 513,641 95.0% Dover Sun Park Energy 2,313,900 2,313,900 1,981,195 332,705 85.6% Renewal Energy Credits (Incl. Solar) 1,036,800 1,036,800 313,930 722,870 30.3% RGGI 175,000 175,000 66,080 108,920 37.8% PJM Charges - Energy 7,966,100 7,966,100 2,894,738 5,071,362 36.3% PJM Charges - Transmission & Fees 7,932,500 7,932,500 4,897,733 3,034,767 61.7% Total Power Supply 54,048,000 54,048,000 42,333,407 11,714,593 78.3% Plant Operations 6,434,600 6,382,900 5,177,815 1,205,085 81.1% Generation Fuels 1,167,300 1,167,300 1,227,300 (60,000) 105.1% Capacity Credits (10,472,100) (10,472,100) (9,215,100) (1,257,000) 88.0% PJM Spot Market Energy (1,708,300) (1,708,300) (979,317) (728,983) 57.3% PJM Credits (360,000) (360,000) (570,532) 210,532 158.5% Total Generation (4,938,500) (4,990,200) (4,359,834) (630,366) 87.4% Total Power Supply & Generation 49,109,500 49,057,800 37,973,573 11,084,227 77.4% Electric Operating Divisions: Transmission/Distribution 4,068,600 3,437,300 2,892,780 544,520 84.2% Electrical Engineering 1,335,800 1,120,900 950,976 169,924 84.8% Administration 839,300 834,300 625,519 208,781 75.0% Meter Reading 360,500 363,200 316,003 47,197 87.0% Systems Operations 679,800 601,500 529,024 72,476 88.0% Intrafund Services 3,738,500 3,586,200 3,276,002 310,198 91.4% Utility Tax 1,281,100 1,309,600 1,198,516 111,084 91.5% OPEB Trust Contribution - Unfunded Liability 1,030,000 - - - 0.0% Retirees Health Care 537,800 57,700 57,700 - 100.0% Interest on Deposits 20,500 20,500 17,028 3,472 83.1% Green Energy Payment to DEMEC 128,000 128,000 116,077 11,923 90.7% Accounts Receivable Write-Offs 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 100.0% Other Employee Expenses 72,000 353,400 - 353,400 0.0% Bank & CC Fees 242,300 259,300 236,393 22,907 91.2% Debt Service 3,402,000 1,617,700 1,468,716 148,984 90.8% Transfers Out: General Fund 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 - 100.0% Electric Improvement & Extension Fund 3,500,000 3,500,000 2,625,000 875,000 75.0% Rate Stabilization Reserve - 394,800 394,800 - 100.0% Transfer to Insurance Reserve 10,000 10,000 10,000 - 100.0% Transfer to Contingency Reserve 13,000 13,000 13,000 - 100.0% Total Expenses 80,568,700 76,865,200 62,901,107 13,964,093 81.8% Budget Balance - Work. Capital 9,144,900 13,302,700 - 13,302,700 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenses $ 89,713,600 $ 90,167,900 $ 62,901,107 $ 27,266,793 69.8% Reserve Balances Contingency Reserve $ 844,600 $ 841,900 $ 848,859 Insurance Reserve $ 758,700 $ 756,300 $ 762,508 Rate Stabilization Reserve $ 4,602,600 $ 7,207,100 $ 7,259,586 Bond Coverage Ratio (Covenant 1.25) 2.62 7.29 5.07 Megawatt Hours Sold & Purchased Sales to Customers MWh (excluding Street Light MWh) 712,390 712,390 646,597 90.8% Sales per MWh $ 109.88 $ 109.88 $ 110.50 100.6% Purchased/Generated MWh 741,522 741,522 674,784 91.0% All In MWh Supply & Generation $ 66.23 $ 66.23 $ 56.28 85.0% 5

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report - May 2016 General Capital Project Fund Summary Revised 92% Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Projects $ 154,800 $ 2,926,700 $ 2,926,738 $ (38) 100.0% Revenues State Grant - Other - 80,500 61,765 18,735 76.7% Interest Earnings 5,000 5,000 4,323 677 86.5% Income from Sale of Assets 20,300 120,800 111,213 9,587 92.1% Transfer from General Fund for Projects 2,625,400 2,625,400 1,969,050 656,350 75.0% Miscellaneous Receipts - Reimb for Village of Cannon Mills - 74,700 74,680 20 100.0% Total Revenues 2,650,700 2,906,400 2,221,031 685,369 76.4% Total Beginning Balance & Revenue $ 2,805,500 $ 5,833,100 $ 5,147,769 $ 685,331 88.3% Expenditures Fire $ 145,600 $ 445,800 $ 445,594 $ 206 100.0% Grounds Maintenance 201,100 185,200 68,352 116,848 36.9% Recreation - 73,900 7,850 66,050 10.6% Life Safety 55,700 55,700 56,411 (711) 101.3% Police 262,100 302,700 246,696 56,004 81.5% Streets 1,428,500 3,735,000 2,242,546 1,492,454 60.0% Sanitation 449,000 449,000 253,871 195,129 56.5% City Manager 24,700 24,700 - 24,700 0.0% Fleet Maintenance 84,000 84,500 - 84,500 0.0% Transfer to Capital Asset Reserve - 92,700 - 92,700 0.0% Total Expenditures 2,650,700 5,449,200 3,321,320 2,127,880 61.0% Budget Balance - Projects 154,800 383,900 - 383,900 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenditures $ 2,805,500 $ 5,833,100 $ 3,321,320 $ 2,511,780 56.9% Reserve Balances Capital Asset Replacement Reserve $ 916,500 $ 1,251,300 $ 1,159,544 Parkland/Recreation $ 296,700 $ 324,900 $ 358,932 6

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report - May 2016 Water/Wastewater Improvement & Extension Fund Summary Revised 92% Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Water $ 833,500 $ 4,990,300 $ 4,990,310 $ (10) 100.0% Beginning Balance - Wastewater $ 1,027,600 $ 4,551,700 $ 4,551,722 $ (22) 100.0% Revenues Grants Receipts - 20,300 17,631 2,669 86.9% Miscellaneous Receipts - 61,400 70,247 (8,847) 114.4% Interest Earnings 25,000 69,900 105,471 (35,571) 150.9% Transfer from Operating Fund for Water 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,350,000 450,000 75.0% Transfer from Operating Fund for Wastewater 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,125,000 375,000 75.0% Transfer from Impact Fee Reserve - Wastewater 165,000 165,000 20,800 144,200 12.6% Total Revenues 3,490,000 3,616,600 2,704,615 911,985 74.8% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 5,351,100 $ 13,158,600 $ 12,246,647 $ 911,953 93.1% Expenses Water $ 2,028,600 $ 5,442,600 $ 1,582,070 $ 3,860,530 29.1% Wastewater 1,822,100 5,299,100 1,927,790 3,371,310 36.4% Water Treatment Plant - 284,400 171,038 113,362 60.1% Total Expenses 3,850,700 11,026,100 3,680,898 7,345,202 33.4% Budget Balance Water - Working Capital 617,400 1,179,900 - 1,179,900 0.0% Budget Balance Wastewater - Working Capital 883,000 952,600 - 952,600 0.0% Total Budget Balances 1,500,400 2,132,500 - 2,132,500 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 5,351,100 $ 13,158,600 $ 3,680,898 $ 9,477,702 28.0% Reserve Balances Capital Asset Replacement - Water $ 518,500 $ 514,600 $ 518,857 Capital Asset Replacement - Wastewater $ 515,200 $ 513,400 $ 517,670 7

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report - May 2016 Electric Improvement & Extension Fund Summary Revised 92% Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 3,623,600 $ 7,095,300 $ 7,095,270 $ 30 100.0% Revenues Interest Earnings 26,700 57,900 79,376 (21,476) 137.1% Transfer from 2010 Bond Reserve - 2,108,000 2,108,003 (3) 100.0% Miscellaneous Receipts - 15,000 - 15,000 0.0% Transfer from Electric Revenue Fund 3,500,000 3,500,000 2,625,000 875,000 75.0% Income from Sale of Assets - - 4,424 (4,424) 0.0% General Service Billing 1,900,000 1,900,000 305,807 1,594,193 16.1% Total Revenues 5,426,700 7,580,900 5,122,610 2,458,290 67.6% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 9,050,300 $ 14,676,200 $ 12,217,880 $ 2,458,320 83.2% Expenses Electric Generation $ 1,655,000 $ 2,299,800 $ 866,254 $ 1,433,546 37.7% Transmission/Distribution 2,887,600 3,524,900 836,219 2,688,681 23.7% Electrical Engineering 1,724,300 3,288,000 1,634,088 1,653,912 49.7% Meter Reading - 23,000 - 23,000 0.0% Total Expenses 6,266,900 9,135,700 3,336,561 5,799,139 36.5% Budget Balance Bond - Work. Capital 2,783,400 5,540,500 - 5,540,500 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenses $ 9,050,300 $ 14,676,200 $ 3,336,561 $ 11,339,639 22.7% Reserve Balances Depreciation Reserve $ 10,066,400 $ 10,083,600 $ 10,117,298 Future Capacity Reserve $ 10,218,000 $ 10,134,700 $ 10,269,726 City of Dover Electric Revenue Fund FY16 - White Oak Solar Park Incremental Cost Original Budget YTD Balance Power Supply & Generation Dover Sun Park - Energy $ 2,313,861 $ 1,981,195 $ 332,666 Dover Sun Park - REC's 363,381 273,788 89,593 Total Power Supply Cost 2,677,242 2,254,983 422,259 Non-Solar Power Supply Cost (1,304,934) (903,021) (401,913) Incremental Energy Cost $ 1,372,308 $ 1,351,962 $ 20,346 Revenues Customer Sales - Electricity (93,900) (86,014) (7,886) Rent Receipts (93,700) (61,468) (32,232) Total Revenues (187,600) (147,482) (40,118) Incremental Sun Park Cost $ 1,184,708 $ 1,204,479 $ (19,772) MWh Purchased/Generated - Solar 18,159.000 15,173.654 MWh $ Solar Energy $ 127.42 $ 130.57 Solar REC's MWh 2,044.000 MWh $ Solar REC (one month lag)* $ 133.95 8

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report - May 2016 Community Transportation Improvement Fund Revised 92% Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 144,000 $ 57,800 $ 57,798 $ 2 100.0% Revenues Grants Revenue 500,000 839,300 287,202 552,098 34.2% Interest Earned 500 500 137 363 27.4% Total Revenues 500,500 839,800 287,339 552,461 34.2% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 644,500 $ 897,600 $ 345,137 $ 552,463 38.5% Expenses Program Expenses - Del Dot $ 644,000 $ 805,500 $ 541,803 $ 263,697 67.3% Total Expenses 644,000 805,500 541,803 263,697 67.3% Budget Balance - Working Capital 500 92,100 - 92,100 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 644,500 $ 897,600 $ 541,803 $ 355,797 60.4% 9

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report - May 2016 Police Grant Funds Revised 92% Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 125,000 $ 154,900 $ 154,944 $ (44) 100.0% Revenues State & Federal Grants Received 527,300 1,111,900 902,860 209,040 81.2% Interest Earnings - - 1,781 (1,781) 0.0% Total Revenues 527,300 1,111,900 904,641 207,259 81.4% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 652,300 $ 1,266,800 $ 1,059,585 $ 207,215 83.6% Expenses Cadet Program $ 80,300 $ 80,300 $ 66,367 $ 13,933 82.6% Equipment & Program Supplies 410,600 384,600 159,314 225,286 41.4% Technology Equipment 20,000 20,000 2,825 17,175 14.1% Telephone/Fax 15,000 15,000 15,550 (550) 103.7% Training/Conference/Food/Travel 17,000 72,600 67,997 4,603 93.7% Consulting/Audit Fees 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 0.0% Contractual services - 299,400 90,714 208,686 30.3% Operating Transfers - Out 74,400 172,700 126,879 45,821 73.5% Total Expenses 618,300 1,045,600 529,646 515,954 50.7% Budget Balance - Working Capital (Unaudited) 34,000 221,200 - 221,200 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 652,300 $ 1,266,800 $ 529,646 $ 737,154 41.8% City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report - May 2016 Library Grant Fund Revised 92% Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 17,300 $ 30,600 $ 30,571 $ 29 99.9% Revenues Grants Received 278,900 305,500 293,835 11,665 96.2% Federal Grants 2,500 2,500 2,500 - 100.0% Total Revenues 281,400 308,000 296,335 11,665 96.2% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 298,700 $ 338,600 $ 326,906 $ 11,694 96.5% Expenses Program Expenses/Supplies-State Grants $ 24,100 $ 27,500 $ 18,824 $ 8,676 68.5% Program Expenses/Supplies-Federal Grants 2,500 2,500 1,831 669 73.2% Office Supplies 24,000 30,800 23,565 7,235 76.5% Printing/Duplicating 13,200 12,500 8,950 3,550 71.6% Postage 100 100 27 73 27.0% Books 129,200 133,300 101,019 32,281 75.8% Furniture 3,100 7,000 9,827 (2,827) 140.4% Audio Visual Supplies 75,100 77,200 58,431 18,769 75.7% Training/Conference/Food/Travel 2,000 8,800 3,235 5,565 36.8% Contractual Services 900 - - - 0.0% Office Equipment/Repairs & Maintenance 6,000 6,300 5,105 1,195 81.0% Other Equipment - Lease 1,200 2,000 1,697 303 84.9% Total Expenses 281,400 308,000 232,511 75,489 75.5% Budget Balance - Working Capital 17,300 30,600 - 30,600 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 298,700 $ 338,600 $ 232,511 $ 106,089 68.7% 10

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report - May 2016 After School Program/Substance Abuse Prevention Fund Revised 92% Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 41,000 $ 98,200 $ 98,181 $ 19 100.0% Revenues Grants Received 55,700 28,000 28,030 (30) 100.1% Recreation Revenue 33,000 50,000 45,054 4,946 90.1% Total Revenues 88,700 78,000 73,084 4,916 93.7% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 129,700 $ 176,200 $ 171,265 $ 4,935 97.2% Expenses Temporary Help/Benefits $ 60,200 $ 60,200 $ 47,753 $ 12,447 79.3% Program Expenses/Supplies 55,700 55,700 26,232 29,468 47.1% Total Expenses 115,900 115,900 73,985 41,915 63.8% Budget Balance - Working Capital 13,800 60,300 - 60,300 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 129,700 $ 176,200 $ 73,985 $ 102,215 42.0% City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report - May 2016 CDBG Fund Revised 92% Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 2,100 $ 2,100 $ 87,290 $ (85,190) 4156.7% Revenues Grants Received 265,400 272,800 246,403 26,397 90.3% Interest Earnings - - 158 (158) 0.0% Total Revenues 265,400 272,800 246,561 26,239 90.4% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 267,500 $ 274,900 $ 333,851 $ (58,951) 121.4% Expenses Closing Cost/Down Payment Program $ 60,000 $ 60,900 $ 60,000 $ 900 98.5% Connection Community Supply Program 7,400 7,400 4,952 2,448 66.9% Dover Interfaith Ministry 27,000 27,000 26,928 72 99.7% MHDC Emergency Home Repair 35,300 35,300 12,989 22,311 36.8% MHDC Homeowner Rehab 52,900 52,900 39,506 13,394 74.7% Habitat For Humanity 40,000 40,000 37,047 2,953 92.6% NCALL Research Inc. - 6,500 5,500 1,000 84.6% Peoples Place 6,800 6,800 6,722 78 98.9% Salaries 36,000 36,000 33,360 2,640 92.7% NSP Expense - - 74,250 (74,250) 0.0% Total Expenses 265,400 272,800 301,254 (28,454) 110.4% Budget Balance - Working Capital 2,100 2,100 - 2,100 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 267,500 $ 274,900 $ 301,254 $ (26,354) 109.6% 11

MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2016

Date Range: From 05/01/2016 to 05/31/2016 Incident Run Log Company: All Companies Dover Fire Department Sorted by: Not selected Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type Lgth 05/01/2016 30046 2016-000398 10:20 400 N DUPONT HWY H False alarm or false call, other 0.3 05/01/2016 30046 2016-000399 11:00 101 N GOVERNORS BLVD Motor vehicle accident with injuries 0.9 05/01/2016 30046 2016-000400 12:00 1441 N DUPONT HWY Service Call, other 0.5 05/01/2016 30046 2016-000401 12:57 35 LOOCKERMAN PLAZA Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 0.2 05/01/2016 30046 2016-000402 15:41 139 S STATE ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 0.1 05/01/2016 30046 2016-000403 20:32 110 HAMAN DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 0.3 05/02/2016 30046 2016-000404 18:38 SOUTH DUPONT HWY Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 0.3 05/02/2016 30046 2016-000405 19:17 9 STATE CIR Cooking fire, confined to container 0.4 05/03/2016 30046 2016-000406 11:42 Charring Cross Dr Animal rescue 1.0 05/03/2016 30046 2016-000407 11:47 868 S STATE ST Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 0.2 05/03/2016 30046 2016-000408 16:06 884 WALKER RD A Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 0.6 05/04/2016 30046 2016-000409 01:23 1200 N DUPONT HWY Central station, malicious false alarm 0.1 05/04/2016 30046 2016-000410 11:44 325 RUSTIC LA Combustible/flammable gas/liquid condition, other 0.7 05/04/2016 30046 2016-000411 17:41 428 N GOVERNORS AVE Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 0.3 05/04/2016 30046 2016-000412 17:57 1200 N DUPONT HWY Dispatched & canceled en route 0.1 05/05/2016 30046 2016-000413 15:34 1030 FORREST AVE 106 Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 0.3 05/05/2016 30046 2016-000414 16:05 1570 N DUPONT HWY 0.1 05/05/2016 30046 2016-000415 19:18 6 LAKEVIEW DR Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 0.3 05/06/2016 30046 2016-000416 10:09 930 WHATCOAT DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 0.4 05/06/2016 30046 2016-000417 11:20 4 BENNINGTON ST False alarm or false call, other 0.2 05/06/2016 30046 2016-000418 18:13 29 n. new street Building or structure weakened or collapsed 1.4 05/07/2016 30046 2016-000419 02:59 426 S NEW ST Emergency medical service incident, other 0.5 05/07/2016 30046 2016-000420 16:36 17 N AMERICAN AVE 0.3 05/08/2016 30046 2016-000421 16:15 13 GREENWAY SQUARE Overheated motor 0.5 05/08/2016 30046 2016-000422 16:39 203 SHELDRAKE CIRCLE Motor vehicle accident with injuries 0.5 05/09/2016 30046 2016-000423 02:50 44 VIRGINIA AVE Smoke scare, odor of smoke 0.5 05/09/2016 30046 2016-000424 04:09 S DUPONT HWY Assist police or other governmental agency 0.4 05/09/2016 30046 2016-000425 20:24 170 HOLMES ST Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 0.5 05/10/2016 30046 2016-000426 04:18 30 CHATHAM CT Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 0.3 05/10/2016 30046 2016-000427 09:57 123A Willis road CO detector activation due to malfunction 0.7 05/11/2016 30046 2016-000428 01:17 1 W LOOCKERMAN ST False alarm or false call, other 0.3 05/11/2016 30046 2016-000429 01:20 152 S STATE ST False alarm or false call, other 0.7 05/11/2016 30046 2016-000430 11:19 1035 FORREST AVE Dispatched & canceled en route 0.2 05/11/2016 30046 2016-000431 16:09 1289 WALKER RD BUILD B Assist police or other governmental agency 1.2 05/12/2016 30046 2016-000432 07:00 209 S STATE ST Combustible/flammable gas/liquid condition, other 0.3 05/12/2016 30046 2016-000433 07:35 1710 N DUPONT HWY Good intent call, other 0.5 05/12/2016 30046 2016-000434 08:39 121 W LOOCKERMAN ST Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 0.2 05/13/2016 30046 2016-000435 00:20 21 BERTRAND DR Medical assist, assist EMS crew 0.3 05/13/2016 30046 2016-000436 12:36 3 S INDEPENDENCE BLVD Cooking fire, confined to container 0.1 05/14/2016 30046 2016-000437 14:46 42 BRITTINGHAM DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 0.2 05/15/2016 30046 2016-000438 06:41 500 PERSIMMON TREE LA 1 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 0.6 05/15/2016 30046 2016-000439 12:58 1175 MCKEE RD Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 0.3 05/15/2016 30046 2016-000440 16:48 23 GREENWAY SQ Overheated motor 0.4 05/15/2016 30046 2016-000441 18:08 86 W. LEBANON ST. Dispatched & canceled en route 0.2 05/15/2016 30046 2016-000442 19:23 1131 N DUPONT HWY Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 0.3 05/15/2016 30046 2016-000443 23:52 1572 N DUPONT HWY Dispatched & canceled en route 0.1 05/16/2016 30046 2016-000444 09:11 174 MIFFLIN RD Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 0.6 05/16/2016 30046 2016-000445 13:47 101 BABB DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 0.0 05/16/2016 30046 2016-000446 15:23 1 N American Ave Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 0.4 05/16/2016 30046 2016-000447 15:59 1110 Forrest ave Good intent call, other 0.3 05/16/2016 30046 2016-000448 19:19 1300 S FARMVIEW DR K Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 0.4 05/17/2016 30046 2016-000449 07:54 430 COLLEGE RD 100 Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1.8 05/17/2016 30046 2016-000450 17:25 313 MACARTHUR DR Dispatched & canceled en route 0.1 05/18/2016 30046 2016-000451 08:04 225 SAULSBURY RD System malfunction, other 0.0 05/18/2016 30046 2016-000452 15:53 104 SAULSBURY RD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 0.3 05/19/2016 30046 2016-000453 01:12 104 SAULSBURY RD System malfunction, other 0.4 05/19/2016 30046 2016-000454 08:40 655 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 0.4 05/19/2016 30046 2016-000455 12:33 MCKEE RD Motor vehicle accident with injuries 0.6 05/19/2016 30046 2016-000456 12:48 FOREST ST EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 0.1 Date: 06/15/2016 Page: 1 Time:09:25

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type Lgth 05/19/2016 30046 2016-000458 23:39 11 GREENWAY SQUARE Good intent call, other 0.3 05/20/2016 30046 2016-000459 12:25 1404 FORREST AVE. Outside rubbish fire, other 0.3 05/20/2016 30046 2016-000460 17:45 SUNSET TERRACE Extrication, rescue, other 0.5 05/21/2016 30046 2016-000461 00:50 120 N STATE ST Dispatched & canceled en route 0.1 05/21/2016 30046 2016-000462 07:21 1300 S FARMVIEW DR G 0.6 05/21/2016 30046 2016-000463 12:46 1171 BAY RD False alarm or false call, other 0.3 05/21/2016 30046 2016-000464 16:47 60 ROCKFORD CROSSING Cooking fire, confined to container 0.4 05/22/2016 30046 2016-000465 18:19 649 VISTA AVE Building fire 1.4 05/23/2016 30046 2016-000466 01:23 SR1 SR1 AND Rt 9 EXIT Motor vehicle accident with injuries 1.3 05/23/2016 30046 2016-000467 05:40 426 S NEW ST Medical assist, assist EMS crew 0.5 05/23/2016 30046 2016-000468 12:33 371 MANNERING DR Assist invalid 1.1 05/23/2016 30046 2016-000469 21:35 725 HORSEPOND RD Service Call, other 0.1 05/24/2016 30046 2016-000470 03:55 1200 N DUPONT HWY Dispatched & canceled en route 0.2 05/24/2016 30046 2016-000471 16:55 245 N DUPONT HWY Good intent call, other 0.4 05/25/2016 30046 2016-000472 00:00 234 N KIRKWOOD ST Police matter 3.0 05/25/2016 30046 2016-000473 09:19 101 BABB DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 0.3 05/25/2016 30046 2016-000474 12:53 2928 SHARON HILL RD Public service 0.4 05/25/2016 30046 2016-000475 15:18 WOODFORD ST Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 0.1 05/26/2016 30046 2016-000476 07:37 1200 N DUPONT HWY Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 0.1 05/26/2016 30046 2016-000477 13:08 35 LOOCKERMAN PLAZA Natural vegetation fire, other 0.2 05/26/2016 30046 2016-000478 15:37 35 LOOCKERMAN PLAZA Natural vegetation fire, other 0.1 05/27/2016 30046 2016-000479 09:52 N DUPONT HWY & LAKEVIEW DR Vehicle accident, general cleanup 0.3 05/27/2016 30046 2016-000480 13:29 414 FEDERAL ST Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 0.1 05/27/2016 30046 2016-000481 14:56 121 MCKEE RD Motor vehicle accident with injuries 0.4 05/27/2016 30046 2016-000482 18:11 133 SWEETGUM DR Building fire 1.5 05/27/2016 30046 2016-000483 21:19 1183 WALKER ROAD Natural vegetation fire, other 0.3 05/27/2016 30046 2016-000484 23:35 4225 HAZETTVILLE RD Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 0.7 05/29/2016 30046 2016-000485 16:43 WALKER RD & SAULSBURY RD Motor vehicle accident with injuries 0.3 05/29/2016 30046 2016-000486 17:08 60 DEER TRACK LA Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 0.3 05/29/2016 30046 2016-000487 21:11 2020 SHARON HILL RD System malfunction, other 0.3 05/29/2016 30046 2016-000488 21:40 970 WHATCOAT DR Malicious, mischievous false call, other 0.1 05/30/2016 30046 2016-000489 15:57 SALISBURY RD Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 0.3 05/30/2016 30046 2016-000490 18:47 160 CONTINENTAL DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 0.3 05/30/2016 30046 2016-000491 22:11 1061 S LITTLE CREEK RD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 0.4 05/31/2016 30046 2016-000492 01:05 129 PERIWINKLE DR Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 2.4 Total Number of Incidents: 94 Total Length of Incidents: 43.6 Hours

12:05 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 06/12/16 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail May 2016 Type Date Num Ordinary Income/Expense Expense Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance Check 05/08/2016 1562 Check 05/08/2016 1563 Check 05/08/2016 1563 Check 05/08/2016 1563 Check 05/08/2016 1563 Check 05/08/2016 1563 Check 05/08/2016 1568 Check 05/21/2016 1573 Check 05/21/2016 1574 Check 05/21/2016 1575 Total Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance Electricity Check 05/08/2016 1566 Check 05/21/2016 1576 Total Electricity Heating Expenses- Gas Check 05/08/2016 1565 Check 05/08/2016 1565 Total Heating Expenses- Gas Program Expenses Check 05/08/2016 1571 Check 05/21/2016 1577 Check 05/21/2016 1579 Check 05/30/2016 1581 Total Program Expenses Telephone Check 05/08/2016 1572 Total Telephone Training & Travel Expenses Check 05/08/2016 1569 Check 05/08/2016 1570 Check 05/22/2016 1580 Check 05/22/2016 1580 Total Training & Travel Expenses Uniforms Check 05/08/2016 1564 Check 05/08/2016 1567 Total Uniforms Page 1 of 8

12:05 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 06/12/16 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail May 2016 Type Date Num Water/Sewer Check 05/08/2016 1566 Check 05/08/2016 1566 Check 05/21/2016 1576 Check 05/21/2016 1578 Total Water/Sewer Total Expense Net Ordinary Income Net Income Page 2 of 8

12:05 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 06/12/16 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail May 2016 Name Ordinary Income/Expense Expense Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance Atlantic Emergency Solutions Atlantic Emergency Solutions Atlantic Emergency Solutions Atlantic Emergency Solutions Atlantic Emergency Solutions Atlantic Emergency Solutions Dover Automotive Atlantic Emergency Solutions Atlantic Emergency Solutions Kunkel Auto Supply Total Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance Electricity City of Dover Utility City of Dover Utility Total Electricity Heating Expenses- Gas Chesapeake Utilities Chesapeake Utilities Total Heating Expenses- Gas Program Expenses Witmer Public Safety Municipal Emergency Services Witmer Public Safety United Electric Supply Total Program Expenses Telephone Verizon Wireless Total Telephone Training & Travel Expenses International Academies of Emergecy Dispa International Academies of Emergecy Dispa Delaware State Fire School Delaware State Fire School Total Training & Travel Expenses Uniforms Carter Knotts Dover Army-Navy Store Total Uniforms Page 3 of 8

12:05 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 06/12/16 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail May 2016 Name Water/Sewer City of Dover Utility City of Dover Utility City of Dover Utility Sharp Water Culligan Total Water/Sewer Total Expense Net Ordinary Income Net Income Page 4 of 8

12:05 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 06/12/16 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail May 2016 Memo Clr Split Ordinary Income/Expense Expense Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance Invoice- 11283DEL- Ladder 1 annual service City Fund Account Invoice- 11303DEL- Ladder 2 annual service City Fund Account Invoice- 11305DEL- Eng 2 data link junction block replaced City Fund Account Invoice- 11321DEL- Eng 2 air pressure problem City Fund Account Invoice-11355DEL- Ladder 1 Inspect steps from damage City Fund Account Invoice- 11363DEL- E-7 pump packing replaced City Fund Account Invoice # 793101- guages City Fund Account Invoice-11262DEL- Eng 6 air leaks.misc repairs City Fund Account Invoice-11366DEL- Rescue 1 DOT and Service City Fund Account Ref-56489577- Hyper Wash City Fund Account Total Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance Electricity Acct # 44343-32052 City Fund Account Acct # 44255-31966 City Fund Account Total Electricity Heating Expenses- Gas Acct # 01-72348-3180-1 City Fund Account Acct # 01-300566-14195-1 City Fund Account Total Heating Expenses- Gas Program Expenses Invoice # 1674383- repair MSA air packs City Fund Account Invoice-IN1026789-batteries for air packs City Fund Account Invoice # 1687589- MSA Meter Service Plan City Fund Account Order # S103413593.001- Circuit Breaker 24OV 60A City Fund Account Total Program Expenses Telephone IPAD charges from 03/21 to 04/20 City Fund Account Total Telephone Training & Travel Expenses EFD recert- Alex Carrow-2026458 City Fund Account Fire CDE Quiz- Gregory Parsell- 346768 City Fund Account Invoice # 16-2603- Basuc F/F Skills City Fund Account Invoice # 16-2724- NREMT Transition/DVFA Seminar City Fund Account Total Training & Travel Expenses Uniforms Reimbursement for uniform shirt purchase City Fund Account Uniform pants for Knotts City Fund Account Total Uniforms Page 5 of 8

12:05 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 06/12/16 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail May 2016 Memo Clr Split Water/Sewer Acct # 44345-32054 City Fund Account Acct # 44341-32050 City Fund Account Acct # 44253-31964 City Fund Account Invoice-1848197 City Fund Account Total Water/Sewer Total Expense Net Ordinary Income Net Income Page 6 of 8

12:05 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 06/12/16 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail May 2016 Amount Balance Ordinary Income/Expense Expense Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance 12,230.57 12,230.57 12,268.83 24,499.40 749.73 25,249.13 837.39 26,086.52 238.29 26,324.81 1,239.92 27,564.73 39.58 27,604.31 7,759.33 35,363.64 2,555.75 37,919.39 131.53 38,050.92 Total Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance 38,050.92 38,050.92 Electricity 2,722.87 2,722.87 406.93 3,129.80 Total Electricity 3,129.80 3,129.80 Heating Expenses- Gas 740.22 740.22 152.82 893.04 Total Heating Expenses- Gas 893.04 893.04 Program Expenses 147.34 147.34 66.16 213.50 1,335.00 1,548.50 234.97 1,783.47 Total Program Expenses 1,783.47 1,783.47 Telephone 300.20 300.20 Total Telephone 300.20 300.20 Training & Travel Expenses 50.00 50.00 5.00 55.00 750.00 805.00 170.00 975.00 Total Training & Travel Expenses 975.00 975.00 Uniforms 49.90 49.90 112.65 162.55 Total Uniforms 162.55 162.55 Page 7 of 8

12:05 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 06/12/16 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail May 2016 Amount Balance Water/Sewer 59.50 59.50 5.00 64.50 23.98 88.48 125.00 213.48 Total Water/Sewer 213.48 213.48 Total Expense 45,508.46 45,508.46 Net Ordinary Income -45,508.46 -45,508.46 Net Income -45,508.46 -45,508.46 Page 8 of 8

FY 15-16 City Funded Account Balance Sheet ACCOUNT BUDGET SPENT BALANCE Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance $ 85,300.00 $ 154,177.61 $ (68,877.61) Building Maintenace Supplies $ 1,500.00 $ 185.32 $ 1,314.68 Command Vehicle $ 50,000.00 $ 46,973.93 $ 3,026.07 Contractual Services $ 10,500.00 $ 10,500.00 Electricity $ 45,000.00 $ 37,761.42 $ 7,238.58 Gasoline $ 20,000.00 $ 9,896.47 $ 10,103.53 Heating Expenses- Gas $ 16,000.00 $ 10,188.31 $ 5,811.69 Medical Supplies $ 1,000.00 $ 615.22 $ 384.78 Office Supplies $ 2,000.00 $ 997.96 $ 1,002.04 Other Equipment Repairs $ 2,000.00 $ 737.39 $ 1,262.61 Program Expenses $ 37,000.00 $ 31,350.39 $ 5,649.61 Radio Repairs $ 2,000.00 $ 967.40 $ 1,032.60 Safety & Security $ 1,500.00 $ 26.30 $ 1,473.70 Small Tools $ 4,500.00 $ 561.44 $ 3,938.56 Telephone $ 10,000.00 $ 7,625.01 $ 2,374.99 Training & Travel $ 10,000.00 $ 3,190.00 $ 6,810.00 Uniforms & Firefighting Gear $ 30,000.00 $ 5,685.70 $ 24,314.30 Water/ Sewer $ 3,000.00 $ 1,359.63 $ 1,640.37 Balance as of 05/31/16

DEPARTMENT OF POLICE Paul M. Bernat 400 South Queen Street Chief of Police Dover, Delaware 19904 F.B.I.N.A. 302-736-7111 Fax: 302-672-1842 July 11, 2016 Honorable Robin Christiansen, Mayor Member of Dover City Council City Hall Dover, DE 19901 Mayor Christiansen and Council Members: The following is the monthly report for Dover Police Department activities for the month of May 2016: COMPLAINTS Total complaints received through May 31st, numbered 17,818, this is an increase of 3,112 complaints over the same period last year. 20,000 17,818 14,936 14,500 14,706 13,764 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS 6 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Burglary Robbery Rape Homicide Sudden Death Cases Reported in May Cases Cleared In May Cases Cleared from Previous Months 1|Page

DRUGS, VICE, & ORGANIZED CRIME SECTION (DVOC) SEIZURES Along with the drug seizures below, the DVOC also recovered $3,878.00 USD during the month of May. 6,000.00 3,897.92 4,000.00 2,000.00 63.4 1 3 2.53 0.00 Marijuana Cocaine Ectasy (Doses) Oxycodone Heroin (Doses) GRAMS/DOSES FIREARM SEIZURES 4 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI DVOC PATROL SEU HANDGUN RIFLE SHOTGUN COMMUNITY POLICING – SAFE STREETS ENFORCEMENT & CADETS SAFE STREETS ENFORCEMENT CONTACTS ABANDONED VEHICLES 12 ALCOHOL VIOLATIONS/DUI’S 0 ASSIST OTHER 50 WARRANTS ON FILE 0 CITY PARK VIOLATIONS 0 CRIMINAL ARRESTS 91 CADETS CONTACTS DRUG RELATED ARRESTS 42 PARKING 62 LOUD MUSIC 0 DCO’S 82 MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS 7 OPEN CONTAINER 15 PARKING VIOLATIONS 16 LOUD NOISE 1 PEDDLER 0 LEWDNESS 0 MEETINGS 138 OTHER 4 CURFEW CHECKS 120 BUSINESS CONTACTS 97 CRIME PREVENTION CHECK 0 LIBRARY CHECKS 3 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 16 COMPLAINTS ASSIGNED 71 WARNINGS 8 SPECIAL EVENT 6 FUGITIVE 10 TOTAL CONTACTS 341 DCO 1 PROSTITUTION 0 TOTAL CONTACTS 511 2|Page

TRAFFIC ARRESTS The department issued 6,812 traffic citations through this reporting period, this is an increase of 1,429 citations over the number issued during the same period last year. 8,000 7,225 6,857 6,654 6,812 7,000 6,000 5,383 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 TRAFFIC CRASHES Through May 31st, the Dover Police investigated 751 traffic crashes, an increase of 22 crashes investigated during the same period last year. 900 842 850 802 800 758 751 750 729 700 650 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 911 Center During the month of May, the Dover Police Department handled a total of 9,153 calls averaging 296 calls per day. Dispatchers handled 2,245 on the 911 wireless lines, 523 on the 911 landlines, and 168 on the Voice Over Internet Protocol lines, the remaining 6,217 were administrative calls. 24% 6% 68% 2% 911 Wireless 911 Landline VoIP Administrative 3|Page

CITY ORDINANCE SUMMONS Through May 31st, we issued 2,920 city ordinance summons, an increase of 269 summonses for the same period last year. Note: Of those summonses issued in May, 18 DCO’s were issued for handicapped parking violations and 5 for fire lane parking violations, 139 for false alarms (96, for 1-2 alarms, 41, for 3-5 alarms, 2, for 6-9 alarms, 0, for 10-15 alarms, and 0, for 16 or more alarms) and 15 for noise violations 6, for vehicle violations and 9, for residence violations). 3,500 3,177 3,038 2,736 2,837 2,920 3,000 2,651 2,500 2,003 1,812 2,000 1,586 1,420 1,500 1,000 500 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ISSUED 3,177 3,038 2,837 2,651 2,920 PAID 2,736 1,812 2,003 1,586 1,420 SEX OFFENDER STATISTICS/MAY MONTHLY NON COMPLIANT VERIFICATIONS NOTIFICATIONS REVERIFICATIONS WARRANTS TIER 1 0 0 0 0 TIER 2 17 1,581 16 3 TIER 3 11 1,323 34 0 ACTIVE SEX OFFENDERS THAT RESIDE IN THE CITY OF DOVER (please note, Tier 1 offenders are not contacted by Dover Police Sex Offender Agents). 200 190 185 180 160 140 120 100 91 88 80 60 40 20 0 APRIL MAY TIER 2 190 185 TIER 3 91 88 4|Page

(Please note, Tier 1 offenders are not contacted by Dover Police Sex Offender Agents). Please visit our website at www.doverpolice.org for up to date information on crimes and activities in the City of Dover. Respectfully Submitted, Paul M. Bernat Chief of Police 5|Page