packet

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JUNE 27, 2016 - 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 15 LOOCKERMAN PLAZA DOVER, DELAWARE OPEN FORUM - 15 MINUTES PRIOR TO OFFICIAL MEETING (7:15 P.M.) THE “OPEN FORUM” SEGMENT IS PROVIDED TO EXTEND THE OPPORTUNITY TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO SHARE THEIR QUESTIONS, THOUGHTS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS, AND COMPLAINTS. DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM APPEARING ON THE AGENDA AS A PUBLIC HEARING IS PROHIBITED DURING THE OPEN FORUM AS AN OPPORTUNITY WILL BE PROVIDED DURING CONSIDERATION OF THAT ITEM. CITIZEN COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. COUNCIL IS PROHIBITED FROM TAKING ACTION SINCE THEY ARE NOT IN OFFICIAL SESSION; HOWEVER, THEY MAY SCHEDULE SUCH ITEMS AS REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND ACT UPON THEM IN THE FUTURE. INVOCATION BY CHAPLAIN WALLACE DIXON PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN ANDERSON AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS * CONSENT AGENDA THOSE ITEMS ON THE COUNCIL AGENDA WHICH ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND NON- CONTROVERSIAL SHALL BE MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK (*) AND WILL BE ACTED UPON BY A SINGLE ROLL CALL VOTE OF THE COUNCIL. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS A MEMBER OF COUNCIL SO REQUESTS, IN WHICH EVENT THE MATTER SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED A SEPARATE ITEM. * 1. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 2. PROGRAM PRESENTATION - FIRST STATE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY 3. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 2016-07 - PROPOSING INCLUSION OF WESTFIELD INTO THE KENT COUNTY STORM WATER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT * 4. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT - JUNE 14, 2016 A. PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE (1) PROGRAM PRESENTATION - FIRST STATE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY (COMMITTEE ACTION NOT REQUIRED) (2) UPDATE - RESIDENTIAL APPEAL PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANT/ NON-CONFORMING USES (COMMITTEE ACTION NOT REQUIRED) (3) CITIZEN SUGGESTIONS (COMMITTEE ACTION NOT REQUIRED)

COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 2 * 4. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT - JUNE 14, 2016 (CONTINUED) B. UTILITY COMMITTEE (1) DIFFERENTIAL DISPOSAL FEE AGREEMENT - DELAWARE SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE PROPOSED DIFFERENTIAL DISPOSAL FEE AGREEMENT WITH THE DELAWARE SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY (DSWA) TO PROVIDE MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE FOR THE CITY OF DOVER FROM JULY 1, 2016 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2021 AT THE RATES SET FORTH IN THE AGREEMENT) (2) QUARTERLY REVIEW OF UTILITY RELATED CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN (CIP) (ELECTRIC AND WATER/WASTEWATER) (JANUARY, FEBRUARY, AND MARCH) (COMMITTEE ACTION NOT REQUIRED) (3) UPDATES (COMMITTEE ACTION NOT REQUIRED) C. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE (1) KENT COUNTY SECONDARY INTENSIVE LEARNING CENTER SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER (SRO) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO NEGOTIATE AND SIGN THE FINAL MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) FOR THE PLACEMENT OF A SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER (SRO) AT THE KENT COUNTY SECONDARY INTENSIVE LEARNING CENTER SITE FOR THE NEXT THREE (3) YEARS (FY-2017, FY-2018 AND FY-2019)) (2) DISPOSITION OF EXCESS PROPERTY - 29 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVENUE AND 749 WEST NORTH STREET (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT THE OFFERS FROM MAUTISTE INVESTMENT GROUP IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,000 FOR 29 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVENUE AND $18,000 FOR 749 WEST NORTH STREET AND WRITE-OFF THE REMAINING EXPENSES AND CHARGES IN THE COMBINED AMOUNT OF $17,718.35 FOR THESE PROPERTIES) (3) DISCUSSION - TAX ACCOUNT DELINQUENCY LISTING (COMMITTEE ACTION NOT REQUIRED) (4) WHATCOAT VILLAGE REVITALIZATION PAYMENT-IN-LIEU OF TAXES (PILOT) (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A FINAL AGREEMENT WITH W HATCOAT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, INC. REGARDING A PROPOSED PILOT AGREEMENT FOR WHATCOAT VILLAGE LOCATED AT 992 WHATCOAT VILLAGE DRIVE) (5) EVALUATION OF REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS (A) COLLECTION AGENCY SERVICES (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AND SIGN A FINAL THREE (3) YEAR AGREEMENT WITH SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC.) (B) HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED AWARDING A THREE (3) YEAR CONTRACT WITH THE OPTION FOR TWO (2) ONE (1) YEAR EXTENSIONS TO A.A. DUCKETT, INC. AS PER THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO RFP #16-0040PW) (6) RECOMMENDATION OF GENERAL EMPLOYEE PENSION BOARD - CONSIDERATION OF A RETIREE COST OF LIVING ALLOWANCE (COLA) (COMMITTEE ACTION NOT REQUIRED)

COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 3 * 4. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT - JUNE 14, 2016 (CONTINUED) C. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE (CONTINUED) (7) PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-16 AMENDING CHAPTER 22 - BUILDING AND BUILDING REGULATIONS; CHAPTER 26 - BUSINESSES; CHAPTER 50 - FLOODS; CHAPTER 66 - MANUFACTURED HOMES AND TRAILERS; CHAPTER 102 - TAXATION; CHAPTER 106 - TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES; CHAPTER 110 - UTILITIES; APPENDIX B - ZONING, ARTICLES 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 12; AND APPENDIX F - FEES AND FINES (SPONSORS: NEIL, SLAVIN, AND COLE) (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-16) (SEE ITEM #8) 5. ABANDONMENT OF TOPAZ CIRCLE STUB STREET/WAIVING THE ABANDONMENT PROCEDURE (DURING THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 9, 2016, COUNCIL APPROVED THE SAFETY, ADVISORY, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE’S RECOMMENDATION OF LOOKING INTO THE PROCESS OF ABANDONING THE TOPAZ CIRCLE STUB STREET) 6. ELECTRIC RATES AND TARIFFS - TRANSMISSION VOLTAGE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CLASSIFICATION ("FT") (STAFF RECOMMENDS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT THE TRANSMISSION VOLTAGE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CLASSIFICATION ("FT") RATE AND TARIFF. THE EFFECTIVE DATE WILL BE BACK DATED TO JULY 1, 2015 AND ALL NECESSARY BILLING ADJUSTMENTS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED.) * 7. APPOINTMENTS (REAPPOINTMENTS) RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR CHRISTIANSEN (A) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - THREE (3) YEAR TERMS TO EXPIRE JULY 2019 (1) K.C. SHETH, CHAIRMAN (2) WILLIAM HUFNAL (B) PLANNING COMMISSION - KATHLEEN WELSH - FIRST DISTRICT - THREE (3) YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 1, 2019 (DEFERRED DURING THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 23, 2016) 8. FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-16 THE FIRST READING IS OFFERED ON THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE. AMENDMENTS TO APPENDIX B - ZONING REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING. IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR REFERRAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON JULY 18, 2016, AND THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE SET FOR AUGUST 8, 2016 AT 7:30 P.M., AT WHICH TIME THE FINAL READING AND COUNCIL ACTION WILL TAKE PLACE. THE ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AT WWW.CITYOFDOVER.COM UNDER "GOVERNMENT," OR BY CONTACTING THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT 736-7008 OR CITYCLERK@DOVER.DE.US. A. PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-16 AMENDING CHAPTER 22 - BUILDING AND BUILDING REGULATIONS; CHAPTER 26 - BUSINESSES; CHAPTER 50 - FLOODS; CHAPTER 66 - MANUFACTURED HOMES AND TRAILERS; CHAPTER 102 - TAXATION; CHAPTER 106 - TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES; CHAPTER 110 - UTILITIES; APPENDIX B - ZONING, ARTICLES 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 12; AND APPENDIX F - FEES AND FINES (LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE)

COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 27, 2016 PAGE 4 9. FINAL READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-17 THE FIRST READING OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE WAS ACCOMPLISHED DURING THE COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016. THE ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AND ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AT WWW.CITYOFDOVER.COM UNDER "GOVERNMENT." A. PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-17 - 2016/2017 CITY OF DOVER BUDGET ORDINANCES 10. CITY MANAGER’S ANNOUNCEMENTS 11. COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ANNOUNCEMENTS 12. ADJOURNMENT EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO: 29 DEL. C. §10004(B)(2) - PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIONS ON SITE ACQUISITIONS FOR ANY PUBLICLY FUNDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, OR SALES OR LEASES OF REAL PROPERTY; 29 DEL. C. §10004(B)(4) - STRATEGY SESSIONS, INCLUDING THOSE INVOLVING LEGAL ADVICE OR OPINION FROM AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW, WITH RESPECT TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING OR PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION, BUT ONLY WHEN AN OPEN MEETING WOULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE BARGAINING OR LITIGATION POSITION OF THE PUBLIC BODY; 29 DEL. C. §10004(B)(6) - DISCUSSION OF THE CONTENT OF DOCUMENTS, EXCLUDED FROM THE DEFINITION OF "PUBLIC RECORD" IN §10002 OF THIS TITLE WHERE SUCH DISCUSSION MAY DISCLOSE THE CONTENTS OF SUCH DOCUMENTS; 29 DEL. C. §10004(B)(9) - PERSONNEL MATTERS IN WHICH THE NAMES, COMPETENCY AND ABILITIES OF INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES ARE DISCUSSED, UNLESS THE EMPLOYEE REQUESTS THAT SUCH A MEETING BE OPEN /TM S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\COUNCIL-AGENDAS\2016\06-27-2016.WPD THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. PURSUANT TO 29 DEL. C. §10004(E)(2), THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, WHICH ARISE AT THE TIME OF THE MEETING.

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING The Regular Council Meeting was held on June 13, 2016 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Slavin presiding. Council members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Sudler, Mr. Neil (departed at 8:09 p.m. and returned at 8:13 p.m.), Mr. Lewis, Mr. Cole, Mr. Hosfelt, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Council staff members present were Police Chief Bernat, Mrs. Mitchell, Mr. Koenig, Mrs. Townshend, Fire Chief Carey, City Solicitor Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Mayor Christiansen was also present (departed at 7:37 p.m.) OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Slavin declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council was not in official session and could not take formal action. There was no one present wishing to speak during the Open Forum. Mr. Slavin requested members to join in a moment of silence for the victims of the June 12, 2016 tragedy in Orlando, Florida. The invocation was given by Bishop Thomas L. Holsey, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Mr. Anderson requested that item #12 - 2016/17 Committee Appointments - Council President, be removed from the Consent Agenda. Mr. Lewis requested that item #1-B - Adoption of Minutes - Special Council Meeting - Budget Review of May 24, 25, and 26, 2016, be removed from the Consent Agenda. Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Consent Agenda, as amended. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 23, 2016 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of May 23, 2016 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Neil, seconded by Mr. Hare and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - BUDGET REVIEW OF MAY 24, 25, AND 26, 2016 Mr. Lewis indicated that, during the Special Council Meeting - Budget Review of May 24, 2016, he asked Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, what his plan B for balancing the 2017 budget would be if the revenue did not come in as anticipated. Mr. Lewis stated that he reviewed the minutes and did not see Mr. Koenig’s response included. He advised members that he had just discussed the matter with Mrs. Traci McDowell, City Clerk, prior to the meeting.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 2 Mr. Slavin stated that Mr. Lewis’ concerns were noted and would be corrected via the City Clerk. Mr. Sudler indicated that he had not seen the discussion regarding the appraisal of the Ridgely Street property in the minutes. Responding to Mr. Slavin, Mr. Sudler agreed to ask the City Clerk to check the minutes. (City Clerk’s Office Note: Subsequent to the meeting, Mrs. McDowell advised members that the Ridgely Street appraisal was mentioned several times throughout the Special Council Meeting - Budget Review of May 24, 25, and 26, 2016 minutes and the final motion for the appraisal could be found on page 68 of the minutes (page 130 of the June 13, 2016 Council packet).) By motion of Mr. Neil, seconded by Mr. Lewis, the Minutes of the Special Council Meeting - Budget Review of May 24, 25, and 26, 2016 were unanimously approved, and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen. CERTIFICATE OF CONGRATULATIONS - TOWNSEND BROTHERS CHEVROLET - 86 YEARS OF BUSINESS The City Clerk read the following Certificate of Congratulations into the record: CERTIFICATE OF CONGRATULATIONS presented to Townsend Brothers Chevrolet in recognition of 86 Years of Business Proudly serving the Dover community since 1930. The City of Dover extends its sincere congratulations on this special milestone. Thank you for your service and commitment to our community. June 13, 2016 On behalf of the Mayor and Council, Mayor Christiansen presented the Certificate to Mr. Jeff Townsend. Mr. Townsend thanked the City for everything it has done for Townsend Brothers and the community, noting that it is a real partnership. He stated that, as a business in the local community, Townsend Brothers tries to take care of the customers who live here, noting the Townsend Brothers and the City have a lot of the same customers. PRESENTATION - 2015 ANNUAL REPORT - ROBBINS HOSE COMPANY (DOVER FIRE DEPARTMENT) Fire Chief Carleton Carey, Jr. reviewed the Robbins Hose Company (Dover Fire Department) 2015 Annual Report. Chief Carey also reviewed the major incidents that had occurred during the first six (6) months of 2016, noting that there was one (1) serious trailer fire, six (6) serious motor

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 3 vehicle accidents with extrication; six (6) working house fires, one (1) of which occurred earlier that day; two (2) building fires; three (3) critical carbon monoxide leaks in apartment buildings; seven (7) incidents where vehicles went into structures; special rescue calls; serious dryer fires in home utility rooms in January and February; and one (1) major gas leak on Loockerman Street. In addition, he noted that the Department had assisted other fire departments nine (9) times, including assisting with a fire in Magnolia on June 12, 2016, and there had been 538 fire calls this year. Chief Carey also informed members that Robbins Hose Company had added five (5) new members this year, and three (3) individuals were scheduled to become members in July. Mr. Hutchison asked how long the department has had a duty officer on call and how this duty is covered. Responding, Chief Carey stated that a duty officer on call has been in place for at least five (5) years, explaining that a duty officer works 24/7, 365 days per year. He stated that one (1) of the eight (8) elected officers is always on call. For example, Chief Carey noted that sometimes an officer would be sent out if an alarm goes off and there is no one in the station. Mr. Hutchison thanked Chief Carey and all of the volunteers for a job well done, noting that Robbins Hose Company and the City have a lot to be proud of. Mr. Slavin recognized former Fire Chief Mark Hall, who was in attendance. He thanked Chief Carey and former Chief Hall, noting that the information provided in the 2015 Annual Report reflected the result of their working together so well last year. Mr. Sudler asked what caused the seven (7) incidents where vehicles went into structures, as well as the gas leak. In response, Chief Carey stated that the gas leak was the result of a car running into a gas meter and knocking it off the foundation. He explained that some of the seven (7) cars that went into structures were the result of individuals driving under the influence, one (1) was a medical issue, and one (1) was a pregnancy. Mr. Sudler moved for acceptance of the Robbins Hose Company (Dover Fire Department) 2015 Annual Report. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. PUBLIC HEARING/FINAL READING OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-09 WITH COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE/SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AMENDMENT #1 (CCW/SA&T #1) A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider proposed amendments to Chapter 98 - Streets, Sidewalks, Storm Sewers and Other Public Places, Article I. - In General, Section 98-10 - Speed Reduction Devices; Appendix A - Subdivisions, Article VI - Subdivision - General Requirements and Design Standards, Section A - Streets, Paragraph 1; and Appendix B - Zoning, Article 10 - Planning Commission, Section 2 - Site Development Plan Approval, 2.54 - Proposed Development. Mr. Sudler moved that the Final Reading of Proposed Ordinance #2016-09 be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of April 11, 2016.)

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 4 Councilman Hosfelt, Chair of the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee, reminded members that Proposed Ordinance #2016-09 was considered by the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee in the Fall of 2015. He advised that owners of private shopping centers had expressed interest in having speed cushions or some type of speed control measure on private property to slow traffic and deter those who use private property to circumvent the normal flow of traffic. Mr. Hosfelt noted that first responders had historically been opposed to any type of speed reduction device; however, Police Chief Paul Bernat, Fire Chief Carleton Carey, Jr., and former Fire Chief Mark Hall had given speed cushions their blessing, so the Proposed Ordinance was being brought forward to Council. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that because the Proposed Ordinance would amend a portion of the Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing before the Planning Commission was required. She noted that it had also been reviewed by the Development Advisory Committee (DAC). Referring to Page 2 of the Petition to Amend Text of the Dover Code of Ordinances, Land Subdivision Regulations, and Zoning Ordinance, Mrs. Townshend pointed out a series of proposed revisions to the Ordinance. She indicated that the revisions were principally technical corrections in terms of construction and that the most significant were recommendations G, H, and I. In terms of agency comments, Mrs. Townshend advised that the Department of Public Works and Fire Marshal’s Office both expressed some concerns regarding the Ordinance. She stated that the Ordinance relates only to private drives and does not affect much from a Public Works standpoint, except trash collection, and City snow plows would not be impacted. Mrs. Townshend stated that the Fire Marshal’s Office had concerns about placing speed cushions in fire lanes, noting that most of the places where placement had been considered would be in fire lanes. She informed members that a public hearing regarding the Ordinance had been held before the Planning Commission on May 16, 2016, and no members of the public spoke. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended against adoption of the Ordinance due to the operational concerns of member agencies. Mrs. Townshend advised that because the Planning Commission gave an unfavorable recommendation, if members chose to adopt the Ordinance they would need to state, for the record, their reasons for voting against the Planning Commission’s recommendation. She indicated that there was a variety of possible actions that Council could take, as follows: 1) adopt the Proposed Ordinance as presented, in which case members would state their reasons for the record; 2) disapprove the Proposed Ordinance; 3) adopt the Proposed Ordinance with amendments A - I on Pages 2 - 3 of the Petition to Amend Text of Dover Code of Ordinances, Land Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance; or 4) refer the Proposed Ordinance back to the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee to review the proposed amendments. Mr. Hutchison advised members that the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee had reviewed this matter in great detail and listened to concerns raised regarding speed cushions. Mr. Hutchison felt strongly that public safety comes first. He thought that speed cushions could address the issues and concerns expressed by citizens and their benefits outweighed any of the concerns expressed. Mr. Hutchison stated that he supported the Ordinance as written.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 5 Mr. Sudler concurred with Mr. Hutchison. He questioned whether members needed to state their reasons, for the record, for voting against the Planning Commission’s recommendation, noting that the requirement was not in the Dover Code. He stated that he had received a 1998 legal opinion from the City Clerk’s Office; however, the requirement to state reasons was not in the Dover Code. Mr. Sudler wanted to make it known to his colleagues that, to his knowledge, they were not held to pointing out for the record why they vote for or against any zoning recommendation. Mr. Anderson advised that he attended both the Planning Commission and Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meetings when this matter was considered. He noted that there was no public input at the Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Anderson believed that the argument raised was not valid because speed cushions, unlike speed bumps, are designed to allow fire and emergency equipment to pass. He stated that he found no compelling reason not to adopt the Proposed Ordinance, as recommended by the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee, which studied this issue in depth. Council President Slavin declared the public hearing open. There being no one present wishing to speak, Council President Slavin declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Hosfelt moved for approval of Council Committee of the Whole/Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Amendment #1 (CCW/SA&T #1) as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cole. Responding to Mr. Anderson’s request for clarification on Amendment #1, Mrs. Traci McDowell, City Clerk, advised that the Amendment #1 changes were highlighted in yellow in the Proposed Ordinance and the term “fire lanes” had been stricken. She explained that it was pointed out by Mr. Timothy Mullaney, former City of Dover Fire Marshal, that fire lanes were most likely the areas where shopping center owners would want speed cushions. Mrs. McDowell advised that Mr. Mullaney recommended the amendment if the intention was to permit speed cushions in fire lanes. The motion to approve Council Committee of the Whole/Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Amendment #1 (CCW/SA&T #1) as presented was unanimously carried. Mr. Hosfelt moved for adoption of the ordinance as amended. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cole and, by a unanimous roll call vote, Ordinance #2016-09 was adopted, as follows: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: That Chapter 98 - Streets, Sidewalks, Storm Sewers and Other Public Places, Article I. - In General, Section 98-10 - Speed Reduction Devices of the Dover Code be amended to read as follows: Sec. 98-10. - Speed reduction devices.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 6 (a) Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this section, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Speed bump shall mean a transverse hump, generally designed as a rounded, raised pavement structure usually from two to six inches high and one to three feet from front to back, set into the surface of a street, parking lot, or driveway to slow the traffic. Their design generally dictates comfortable crossing speeds of five miles per hour or less so they are usually appropriate only for use where vehicle speeds are typically the lowest to begin with such as parking lots, private roads, and on some residential streets. Speed cushion shall mean a speed hump with an unraised path for fire trucks and ambulances through the hump. Speed cushions are devices designed as several small speed humps installed across the width of the road with spaces between them. They are generally installed in a series across a roadway resembling a split speed hump. Speed hump shall mean a raised area in the pavement surface, usually from three to four inches high and 10 to 12 feet from front to back, extending transversely across the travel way. The purpose of the length of a speed hump is to allow the entire vehicle to be on the hump at once before it descends the far side onto the pavement to reduce the likelihood that a vehicle will “bottom out” when going over the speed hump. Speed humps are typically applied to residential streets where speed limits do not exceed 25 miles per hour. (b) Prohibited. Any device used as a means of speed reduction on any city street, drive, parking lot, or any other driveable surface, which causes a change in elevation which may result in emergency equipment having to reduce speed during a time of emergency, is prohibited. (c) Permitted. Speed cushions may be installed on privately owned commercial property, at the owner’s expense, following review by the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee and approval by City Council. Any other type of speed reduction device on private commercial property within the City is prohibited. (d) Installation and Design standards. Installation and design standards for speed cushions shall be in accordance with the Delaware Traffic Calming Design Manual. (Code 1981, § 7-4; Ord. of 5-26-1998) BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: That Appendix A - Subdivisions, Article VI - Subdivision - General Requirements and Design Standards, Section A - Streets, Paragraph 1 of the Dover Code be amended to read as follows: A. - Streets.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 7 1. The layout, character, extent, width, grade and location of proposed streets shall be established with due regard to: (a) Public convenience and safety. (b) Proposed uses of the land to be served by said streets. (c) Proper relation and connection with, continuation and projection of streets to adjacent areas; whether these streets are existing, or proposed in another subdivision, in a neighborhood plan, in the development plan, or in the official map, as approved or adopted by the commission. Where existing or proposed streets are located on adjacent land, then the planning commission shall require street extensions at points in which the commission determines are suitable for future connections to adjacent developable lands on each side of the development. (d) Topography and other land features. (e) Speed reduction devices on any city or private street, drive, parking lot, or any other driveable surface, which causes a change in elevation which may result in emergency equipment having to reduce speed during a time of emergency, is prohibited. Speed cushions may be installed on privately owned commercial property, in accordance with Chapter 98 - Streets, Sidewalks, Storm Sewers and Other Public Places, Article I. - In General, Section 98-10 - Speed Reduction Devices. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 10 - Planning Commission, Section 2 - Site Development Plan Approval, 2.54 - Proposed Development of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text indicated in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 2.54 Proposed development. (A) Existing buildings and other structures. (B) Location and width of all proposed streets and rights-of-way. (C) Location of all proposed structures, except one-family detached dwellings, and an indication of the total number of dwelling units. (D) Location and dimensions of all lot lines. (E) Building setback lines on all lots. (F) Location of all uses not requiring structures, including parks, playgrounds and other open space areas. (G) Location and plans for any outdoor signs. (H) Location, direction, power and time of use for any proposed outdoor lighting. (I) The location, size and arrangement of proposed sidewalks, driveways, loading areas, off-street parking areas and other paved areas. (J) Indication of the total amount of impervious surfaces and the development coverage. (K) Any proposed changes in elevation of the site and elevations of all streets, parking areas, and building foundations. The datum to which all elevations, including existing contour elevations, refer shall be clearly indicated on the plan. (L) Plans for surface drainage of the site. Such plans shall include stormwater run-off calculations and shall show the proposed method of accommodating the anticipated run-off.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 8 (M) Any proposed below-ground or above-ground utilities and any contemplated public improvements, including road improvements, on or adjoining the property. Plans for such utilities and improvements shall indicate whether the developer, the city, or other agency will bear the financial responsibility for the construction, and which improvements are intended to be dedicated to the city. (N) Proposed grading, screening and other landscaping, including types and locations of proposed street trees. (O) Architectural elevation drawings or other graphic representations illustrating exterior building characteristics of proposed buildings and/or building additions that would be visible from the public right-of-way. Elevation drawings shall be drawn to scale and shall reflect major architectural elements such as exterior surface materials, windows, doors, columns, and wall-mounted signage. Elevation plans are intended to provide a general depiction of the physical appearance, massing and scale of the proposed construction. (P) Speed reduction devices on any city or private street, drive, parking lot, fire lane or any other driveable surface, which causes a change in elevation which may result in emergency equipment having to reduce speed during a time of emergency, is prohibited. Speed cushions may be installed on privately owned commercial property, in accordance with Chapter 98 - Streets, Sidewalks, Storm Sewers and Other Public Places, Article I. - In General, Section 98-10 - Speed Reduction Devices. ADOPTED: JUNE 13, 2016 PUBLIC HEARING - ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND BUDGET A public hearing on the Electric Revenue Fund Budget is required for compliance with City of Dover Electric Revenue Bonds Resolutions prior to adoption of the budget. Notice of the public hearing was properly advertised for this time and place. Council President Slavin declared the public hearing open. There being no one present wishing to speak during the public hearing, Council President Slavin declared the public hearing closed. No further action was taken. Council President Slavin noted that the First Reading of the Budget Ordinances would take place during the latter part of the meeting and that the Final Reading and adoption of the Ordinances were scheduled for the Regular Council Meeting of June 27, 2016. 60-DAY PROGRESS REPORT - VIOLATION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING ORDINANCE - PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1032-1058 SOUTH DUPONT HIGHWAY, OWNED BY BMDR LLC During the Regular City Council Meeting of November 9, 2015, members considered a Violation of the Dangerous Building Ordinance at 1032-1058 South DuPont Highway, owned by BMDR LLC. At that time, Council declared the structure located at 1032-1058 South DuPont Highway a dangerous building; ordered that the property be repaired or demolished by July 1, 2016 by the owner or equity owner at their own risk; ordered the Building Inspector to cause the demolition of the structure if not completed by the owner within 10 days of the date established by City Council; ordered the City Manager with the assistance of the City Solicitor to cause the cost of demolition to be charged against the land on which the building exists as a municipal lien or cause such cost to be

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 9 added to the tax duplicate as an assessment, or to be levied as a special tax, or to be recovered in a suit at law against the owner; and that progress reports be provided at the Council Meetings scheduled for January 11, 2016, March 14, 2016, and June 13, 2016. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that she had driven by the property and had not observed any major progress. She explained that a permit had been issued a couple of months ago. Mrs. Townshend spoke to Mr. Robert MacLeish, Sr., Lighthouse Construction, Inc., who indicated that they were actively working inside the building on things that have to be done before they can start construction and would continue forward with renovations. In response to Mr. Hosfelt regarding her recommendation, Mrs. Townshend recommended evaluating the property in another three (3) months. Mr. Hare moved to return the item to full Council in 90 days for a progress report, seconded by Mr. Hosfelt and unanimously carried. PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN: SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING OPTION - THE GRANDE - 90 SAULSBURY ROAD (CLUBHOUSE AND POOL) The Planning Office received a proposal to construct a Clubhouse and Pool to serve The Grande Planned Neighborhood Design (PND), Senior Citizen Housing Option (SCHO), at 90 Saulsbury Road. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that The Grande is located on Route 8 just west of Saulsbury Road. Three (3) buildings have been constructed, and construction of a fourth building will begin in the near future. Mrs. Townshend explained that the current proposal was to construct a pool and clubhouse at 90 Saulsbury Road, which is adjacent to The Grande property, and these amenities would serve those who live at The Grande. She advised that, under the PND ordinance, the first step is for City Council to review the proposal and determine if it is worthy of further review by the Planning Commission. Mrs. Townshend indicated that if this determination is made by City Council, the applicant can file a conditional use application with the Planning Commission. Mr. Anderson questioned if the Planning Commission had reviewed this matter previously. Responding, Mrs. Townshend explained that the Planning Commission had reviewed the apartments at the Grande but not this specific parcel of land or the clubhouse and pool. Responding to Mr. Anderson as to whether the proposal was consistent with the PND or if exceptions were being requested, Mrs. Townshend stated that she believed that the proposal was consistent with the PND. Staff recommended forwarding the plan to the Planning Commission for review. Mr. Hare moved that the Planned Neighborhood Design Development, Senior Housing Option, for The Grande (Clubhouse and Pool) be referred to the Planning Commission for review. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sudler and unanimously carried.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 10 BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS REPORT - MAY 23, 2016 The Board of Assessment Appeals met on May 23, 2016, with Chairman Garfinkel presiding. EXEMPTIONS Central Delaware Habitat for Humanity Locations: Exempt Request: 67 S. Queen St. $13,800 18 S. Queen St. $0 (already exempt) 47 S. Kirkwood St. $11,900 27 N. New St. $13,100 24 N. New St. $0 (already exempt) 20 N. New St. $47,600 101 S. Queen St. $13,400 16 S. Queen St. $0 (already exempt) 45 S. Queen St. $11,900 19 N. New St. $75,500 23 N. Kirkwood St. $10,000 53 S. New St. $47,500 223 W. Division St. $0 (already exempt) 50 S. Governors Ave. $102,500 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS An exemption request for the above referenced properties was submitted to the Assessor's Office. These properties are being renovated for low-income families to provide an affordable mortgage. Once these properties are complete and the ownership is transferred, they will be added back to the tax rolls. (As a supplemental billing) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend that the request for exemption be approved. Mr. Gallo, Executive Director, was present for the meeting. He told the board that Central Delaware Habitat for Humanity is seeking tax exemption for some dilapidated properties the organization purchased, which will be rebuilt and sold to low income families. He also pointed out that with these projects the city streets will be revitalized, therefore bringing in more taxes. Mr. Burns asked how long this process usually takes, Mr. Gallo replied that the process from purchasing to selling usually takes no more than a year. Mr. Burns asked how the organization is able to afford all of these projects. Mr. Gallo explained that they received funds from different organizations.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 11 Mr. Burns asked the Assessor what her opinion was, Mrs. Bundek replied that the organization had been working with the city for a while now and that the city is aware that the properties will eventually go back onto the tax roll. Mr. Galvin made the motion to approve the exempt request for items 1-12 and 14 on the agenda. Mr. Burns seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. Chairman Garfinkle brought everybody's attention to 223 W. Division Street, which had been approved for the exempt status by the board a year ago and was to be revisited by the Board of Assessment Appeal in 2016. He asked Mr. Gallo to tell the board what the current status of that property is. Mr. Gallo informed the board members that this building is to be used as an affiliate office for the organization, which would bring them closer to downtown Dover. He mentioned that he is waiting to find out if enough funding for this office has been generated. As soon as the funding is available the building will be converted into office space for Central Habitat for Humanity, which would allow for a closer contact with the community. Chairman Garfinkel mentioned an organization that appeared before the board the year prior, requesting the exempt status for properties that were to be rented and that the Board of Assessment Appeals denied the request as did City Council at the council meeting at a later council meeting, due to the fact that these properties were going to be used as income properties. Mr. Gallo assured that the building would only be used by the Habitat and that none of the offices would be rented out. Mr. Burns inquired about NCALL (National Council on Agriculture Live & Labor Research Fund Inc.), which is another agency similar to the Habitat organization. He asked the Assessor if properties held by this organization are also exempt from taxes. After making a call to the office, the Assessor assured that the property held by NCALL is exempt. Chairman Garfinkel informed Mr. Gallo that he does not see a problem granting the exemption, as long as the building is not going to be rented out. Mr. Gallo assured the Board that the building will only use by his organization. He went on to explain that if he is not able to convert the building within the next couple of years, he will try to sell it, which will put the property back on the tax rolls.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 12 Mr. Burns made the motion to accept the exempt request for 223 W. Division Street with the prevision, that the building will only be used for office space for the organization. Mr. Galvin seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Board’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hare and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mrs. Bundek informed the appellant, that the City Council has the final decision and that a certified letter with the date of the Council Hearing would be mailed. Whatcoat Community Development Inc. Location: Exempt Request: 992 Whatcoat Village Dr. $4,186,800 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS An exemption request was submitted to the Assessor's Office. This property has been under this ownership since 1970. They are currently paying property tax to the City of Dover RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend that the request for exemption be reviewed. Present for the meeting were: Christopher Lamb Esq., attorney for the property owner Vandana Sareen, VP of the Development for The Michaels Organization Kara Velez, Community Manager for Whatcoat Village Apartments Mr. Hill and Mr. Adams, Representing Whatcoat Community Development Inc. Mr. Lamb started by informing the Board of Assessment Appeals where the property is located. He went on to let the board know that the current owner is Whatcoat Community Development Inc. which is a 501(c)(3) organization and had been incorporated in 1970. Mr. Lamb went to read the purpose of the organization: "The corporation is hereby organized, exclusively for a charitable and religious purpose, and the Business and object to be carried on and prompted by it is to provide, on a non-profit basis, Housing for low and moderate income families and families in need of housing where no adequate housing exists for groups, pursuant to Section 236 of the National Housing Act."

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 13 The attorney explained that the property consists of 78 rent restricted, family apartment units and that 57 units are subsidized by HUD (Housing and Urban Development). He also mentioned that DSHA (Delaware State Housing Authority) and HUD regulate the properties and that tenants are mostly minorities and very low income and that the property qualifies for the exemption under 9 Del. C. § 102-182. Per Mr. Lamb, the property is in need of substantial renovations, costing a lot of money. Therefore, the property would not be able to carry the full tax load. He also explained that the owner realizes the burden the property is putting onto the city and is therefore offering to enter into a $9,000 PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) with the City of Dover. This offer has also been extended to Kent County for $10,000. It was also explained that the property, because of its nature, is eligible for tax credits. These credits are sold to Investors; this money is then used to do this substantial renovation. Ms. Sareen pointed out that under the low income tax credit all units would be subsidized units, meaning by law the income of the residence should be 60% below national average, however the property owner has committed to have the average income at 35% of the median income in Kent County Delaware, which would mean the yearly income per family would be approximately between $15,000 to $20,000. Mr. Burns asked if the property is currently paying taxes and how much those are, since the city would be losing those taxes for a long time to come. The Assessor told the board that the current taxes are approximately $16,000. Mr. Lamb expressed that he is hoping the $9,000 PILOT will be accepted by the city as they do not want to be a burden. Mr. Burns asked the Assessor what her recommendations are? Mrs. Bundek replied that based on the City Solicitors recommendations, the property should be granted the exemption. Mr. Burns made the motion to approve the exempt request with the recommendation that the city manager give the offered PILOT serious consideration. Mr. Galvin seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Board’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hare and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mrs. Bundek informed the appellant that the City Council was the final decision and that a certified letter with the date of the Council Hearing would be mailed.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 14 MONTHLY REPORTS - APRIL 2016 By motion of Mr. Neil, seconded by Mr. Hare, the following monthly reports were accepted by consent agenda: City Assessor’s Report City Manager’s Report City Planner’s Report Controller/Treasurer’s Budget Report Economic Development Office Report Fire Chief’s Report Police Chief’s Report EVALUATION OF BIDS - THE ENERGY AUTHORITY (TEA) CONTRACT RENEWAL Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that several months ago, he and Mr. Harry Maloney, Electric Director, came before the Council Committee of the Whole and discussed potential negotiations with Mr. Kirk Betts, the City’s utility attorney, regarding extension of the City’s contract with The Energy Authority (TEA). He reminded members that TEA performs energy purchasing for the City of Dover. Mr. Koenig advised that staff was recommending an extension of the contract that would also include an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). Mr. Kirk Betts stated that it brought him great joy to come back with the success of the plan that members had sent him out to achieve on the City’s behalf. He noted that the City has had a relationship with TEA since 2011. Mr. Betts advised that TEA acts as the City’s outside, everyday consultant to help operate the electric utility, particularly the more complicated parts outside the City’s distribution system, which includes buying and selling energy on the market. Mr. Betts stated that TEA not only plans the dispatch of the City’s plants but also tries to manage peak load through dispatching, energy purchases through PJM, helping to obtain contracts where the City’s counterparties buy directly from entities that operate through PJM, and balancing this every day. He explained that TEA prepares one (1) year and five (5) year plans to look forward on operations in the context of the budgeting and purchases, and keeps records on how many positions the City has contracts for and how much the City is at risk day to day. Mr. Betts noted that TEA comes to the City each month and provides reports. Mr. Betts advised that in the prior five (5) year contract, TEA helped to operate the City’s plant and oversee the contract with North American Energy Services (NAES). Mr. Betts stated that Mr. Harry Maloney had taken over the responsibility of direct oversight of the plant operating staff, which was a significant part of the original TEA contract. The fact was brought up that Mr. Maloney was now doing a lot of NAES’s work and the City was essentially overpaying for the service. Mr. Betts indicated that TEA, being a municipally-run entity, responded very favorably to that comment and offered to renegotiate the contract, which was about to expire. TEA lowered their price and also offered a service of the approximate value of the one (1) year that Mr. Maloney had overseen the NAES contract. Mr. Betts stated that the contract being considered tonight was lower in price by 16.17%, which took into account Mr. Maloney’s oversight of NAES, as well as other aspects of the contract that the City found were not particularly necessary anymore. For example, Mr. Betts explained that when TEA entered the contract, they embedded in the price some risk for numerous trips to Dover; however, it had been found that a monthly trip was enough, so extra trips

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 15 were stripped. Mr. Betts stated that Council had asked them to obtain a contract that was more reflective of the way the City operates with Mr. Maloney and staff and integrates their work, and to work hard to get a reduction, which had been done. Mr. Betts explained that a new component would be coming in Task Order 1. Not only did TEA reduce the cost, but they gave the City $175,000, the approximate value of Mr. Maloney’s services over the last year, which would go toward an IRP. Mr. Betts explained that the IRP would help look at whether the utility would be serving customers from the generation and buying side going forward, and also how its customers are responding in today’s marketplace. He reminded members that the last time he came before members, changes in the marketplace were discussed. Mr. Betts indicated that generation by coal and nuclear plants was slowly being phased out and solar power, wind power, demand side response, and LED lighting were now factors. He advised that for the first time in his professional lifetime, PJM was showing no growth, and part of the last five (5) year plan that TEA had provided showed virtually no growth for the City’s load. Mr. Betts advised that this was not because the City’s customers were not using energy but the way energy is used today, noting that LED lighting is about 40% - 80% more efficient than typical incandescent light. These factors were having a big impact on how the City looks forward toward serving its customers. Mr. Betts stated the need to consider how to manage the City’s risk of overbuying and having to liquidate in the marketplace as customers change. He explained that the IRP would provide a 20-year perspective, with the first five (5) years and out to 10 years having the most value to the City. It would look at the resources the City should bring to the table when looking at how to serve customers and optimize the value to them and the City. Mr. Betts stated this would be the first such plan for the City, noting that Delmarva Power and Light has to do this every two (2) years and it is a standard best practice in the industry today in planning how to serve customers and managing the risk in serving them. Mr. Betts indicated that this value was being added to the contract, and this portion of the contract would begin almost as soon as the contract is approved. It was hoped that it would be completed in December 2015, but it would more likely be January or February 2016 before a final proposal would come back to the City. Mr. Betts stated that this would be an unbiased report that takes into account operational data, what is going on in the Peninsula and new facilities being built, as well as changes in PJM. He indicated that approximately 72 variables would go into an economic analysis that would produce approximately eight (8) paths for the City to consider regarding how to serve its customers. Mr. Betts reiterated that the City entered the contract with TEA in 2011 and, prior to that, the City contracted with PACE out of Virginia, with an annual fee of $2.447M. He noted that the proposed fee going forward for virtually the same services, except oversight of NAES, would be approximately $835,000, or around one-third of the cost of the service six (6) years ago. Mr. Betts recommended taking advantage of this opportunity quickly. He stated that he, Mr. Maloney, and City staff strongly recommended moving forward with the proposal. Mr. Sudler stated that he had heard the pros regarding this contract and questioned if there were any major cons that concerned Mr. Betts. Responding, Mr. Betts stated that his major concern with any contract is that the parties understand the contract and take advantage of the full scope of it. He noted, for example, that some things had been stripped from the contract, such as training experiences that were deemed unnecessary or too time consuming and were not taken advantage of. Mr. Betts stated that items had been discussed with the City to determine if they were of value or not

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 16 and removed. He felt it important to be aware of what is in a contract and take advantage of the full scope of it. From a professional point of view, Mr. Betts noted that clients often forget about opportunities that are in a contract. He felt that the IRP was a big opportunity that should be worked very hard by the City over the next six (6) or seven (7) months so that the City would realize the value and obtain some genuine planning, as opposed to responsive or reactive planning. He stated that these were not necessarily cons of the contract but were concerns. Staff recommended authorizing the City Manager to execute all contract documents for the three (3) year contract extension and Task Order #1. Mr. Neil moved for approval of staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. DISCHARGING THE YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2008-11 - ESTABLISHING A YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND RESOLUTION NO. 2010-03 - AMENDMENT TO COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2008-11 During the Special Council Meeting - Budget Review of May 26, 2016, Council established a youth focus group initiative across City government. The purpose of the program would be to solicit input on ideas, solutions, and issues from the youth of the City. The following departments will be required to hold a focus group with the youth who are residents of the City of Dover: Planning, Parks and Recreation, Dover Public Library, and Police. The focus group will be held before December 1 of each year and reports of the various departments will be made to Council no later than February 1 of the following year. Mr. Hare moved to discharge the Youth Advisory Committee and rescind Resolution No. 2008-11 - Establishing a Youth Advisory Committee and Resolution No. 2010-03 - Amendment to Council Resolution No. 2008-11. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Anderson moved to refer this matter to the proper committee, which he stated would be the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee, and go through the proper process. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis. Mr. Lewis questioned what the proper protocol would be and whether this matter should first be referred to committee. Responding, Council President Slavin indicated that there was no requirement for items to go through a committee. The motion to refer this matter to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee failed by a roll call vote of seven (7) no (Sudler, Neil, Cole, Hosfelt, Hare, Hutchison, and Slavin), one (1) yes (Anderson), and one (1) abstention (Lewis). Mr. Sudler stated his understanding that the main reason for this action was due to the lack of minutes, transparency, and authorization from Council in regard to the Youth Advisory Committee. Mr. Sudler agreed with the proposed action but requested Council President Slavin to clarify the reasons for it for the sake of constituents.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 17 Mr. Slavin stated that he applauded the efforts to involve youth in government; however, he felt that the form and structure that required them to have their own committee and follow the rules of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) proved to be a difficult fit, noting that there were numerous violations, including meetings without a quorum, public notice, and minutes. Mr. Slavin indicated that in place of the Youth Advisory Committee, through a motion during the budget process, an initiative was created which will require different departments within government to hold focus groups of youth from the community. He explained that young people will be invited to share their ideas, which would essentially have the same net effect of gathering ideas from the youth and incorporating their ideas in managing the City and planning City activities, without the trappings of the structure that was causing problems. Mr. Neil believed that Council wanted to make sure that the youth of the City have a voice, although it would not necessarily be in the current form. He stated that Council wants to hear from the youth and serve them, so this would not be a negative but would take a different direction. Mr. Anderson disagreed with the characterizations of the Youth Advisory Committee, which had been discussed previously, and he indicated that there were inaccuracies. He felt this motion was a mistake and did not support it. Mr. Anderson believed that the Youth Advisory Committee had been doing everything that was asked of it over the past six (6) months under current leadership and that this was an inexplicable move. The motion to discharge the Youth Advisory Committee and rescind Resolution No. 2008-11 - Establishing a Youth Advisory Committee and Resolution No. 2010-03 - Amendment to Council Resolution No. 2008-11 carried by a roll call vote of seven (7) yes (Sudler, Neil, Cole, Hosfelt, Hare, Hutchison, and Slavin), one (1) no (Anderson), and one (1) abstention (Lewis). 2016/17 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - COUNCIL PRESIDENT (Deferred During the Annual Meeting of May 9, 2016) Council President Slavin requested approval of the following appointments: City Chaplains Bishop Thomas L. Holsey of Bibleway Temple Church of God in Christ Chaplain Wallace Dixon of Bibleway Temple Church of God in Christ Civilian Pension Plan - Board of Trustees David L. Anderson Brian E. Lewis Scott D. Koenig, City Manager (ex-officio member) Donna S. Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer (ex-officio member) Compensation Commission Council President Slavin requested that the Compensation Commission appointments be deferred.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 18 Construction Code Appeals Committee David L. Anderson Brian Lewis Scott D. Koenig - City Manager (ex officio member) Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee William F. Hare - Chair Scott W. Cole Roy Sudler, Jr. Courtney Stewart (by Council President) Daniel T. Shevock (by Committee Chair) Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Trust Fund Board Scott W. Cole James E. Hosfelt, Jr. Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Roy Sudler, Jr. - Chair David L. Anderson James E. Hosfelt, Jr. M. Milford Caldwell, Jr. (by Council President) Ann Baker Horsey (by Committee Chair) Police Pension Plan - Retirement Committee David L. Anderson Brian E. Lewis Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee James E. Hosfelt, Jr. - Chair James L. Hutchison, Sr. Brian E. Lewis Dana Shelton (by Council President) Thomas J. Keller, Jr. (by Committee Chair) Utility Committee Scott W. Cole - Chair James L. Hutchison, Sr. Fred A. Neil Lester L. Blakeman, Sr. (by Council President) Tricia Arndt (by Committee Chair) Mr. Anderson stated that he would be voting negatively because he believed that the appointments would violate the seniority tradition. Mr. Lewis noted concerns with the appointments and believed that the process should be changed.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 19 Mr. Sudler requested to hear the concerns of Mr. Anderson and Mr. Lewis. Responding, Mr. Anderson stated that he had simply wanted to state his comment for the record. Mr. Lewis stated that he felt there were flaws in the process and it needed to be changed at a later time through one (1) of the current committees. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Council President Slavin indicated that he was open to any suggestions. Responding to Mr. Hare, Mr. Nicholas Rodriguez, City Solicitor, stated that there was not an ordinance or anything in the Code that referenced seniority in regard to appointments made by the Council President and that the appointments were appropriate. Council President Slavin advised that he had served as Chair of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee and sat next to former Councilman Reuben Salters, who had been on Council for many more years than Mr. Slavin, noting that this was at Mr. Salters’ invitation. Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee appointments for 2016/2017, as recommended by Council President Slavin. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and carried by a vote of seven (7) yes (Sudler, Neil, Cole, Hosfelt, Hare, Hutchison, and Slavin), one (1) no (Anderson), and one (1) abstention (Lewis). 2016/17 MISCELLANEOUS APPOINTMENTS - COUNCIL PRESIDENT (Deferred During the Annual Meeting of May 9, 2016) Council President Slavin requested approval of the following appointments: Central Delaware Chamber of Commerce - Liaison Members Mayor Robin R. Christiansen, Ex-Officio (Non-Voting member) David L. Anderson (Non-Voting Guest) William F. Hare (Non-Voting Guest) City/County Committee (Liaison to Kent County) Mayor Robin R. Christiansen Council President Timothy A. Slavin Fred A. Neil William F. Hare James L. Hutchison Kent County Tourism Board of Directors Fred A. Neil Kent Economic Partnership Board of Directors David L. Anderson (Council President’s nominee) President’s Counsel on Public/Private Partnerships and the Future of City Hall, Weyandt Hall, Former Dover Library, and Other City Properties Council President Slavin requested that the President’s Counsel on Public/Private Partnerships and the Future of City Hall, Weyandt Hall, Former Dover Library, and Other City Properties appointments be deferred.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 20 By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Miscellaneous appointments for 2016/2017, as recommended by Council President Slavin. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. 2016/17 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - MAYOR (Deferred During the Annual Meeting of May 9, 2016) Mayor Christiansen requested that the Compensation Commission, Downtown Dover Partnership, and Election Board appointments be deferred. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved to defer the 2016/17 Mayoral Committee Appointments, seconded by Mr. Hare and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. APPOINTMENT RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR CHRISTIANSEN - DOVER PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY COMMISSION - JILL B. STREET - FIVE (5) YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 16, 2021 (TO FILL THE EXPIRED TERM OF DOROTHY SNYDER) Mayor Christiansen recommended the appointment of Ms. Jill B. Street to serve on the Dover Public Library Advisory Commission for a five (5) year term to expire June 16, 2021, to fill the expired term of Dorothy Snyder. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the appointment of Ms. Street to the Dover Public Library Advisory Commission, as recommended by Mayor Christiansen. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-17 - 2016/2017 CITY OF DOVER BUDGET ORDINANCES Council President Slavin reminded the public that copies of proposed ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers, on the City’s website at www.cityofdover.com under “Government,” or by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at 736-7008 or cityclerk@dover.de.us. Final action by Council on the Proposed Ordinance will take place during the Council Meeting of June 27, 2016. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, stated that Proposed Ordinance #2016-17 was the result of approximately nine (9) hours of introduction and discussion regarding the proposed FY 2017 spending plan. Staff had presented an approximately 300-page document for Council’s review, which had been consolidated into the 27-page Proposed Budget Ordinance. Mr. Koenig advised that the aggregated General Fund budget was approximately $46.7M for FY 2017 and included approximately $42.2M of revenue and expenditures. The aggregated budget for the Water and Sewer Fund was approximately $16.696M, which included approximately $15.467M of revenue and expenditures, and the aggregated budget for the Electric Fund was approximately $92.73M, including $79.428M of revenue and expenditures. Mr. Koenig advised that the total spending plan was estimated at approximately $137,119,000. He noted that the General Fund included no property tax or fee increases for FY 17. Under the Water and Sewer Fund, no rate and fee increases were proposed for FY 17, and these will be closely reviewed moving into future budget years. Mr. Koenig indicated that no rate increases were proposed in the draft FY 17 Electric budget. He noted that Council had voted in favor of the alternate budget design which included an approximate 2% Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) on the energy portion of the electric bill and this alternate had been included

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 21 in the Proposed Budget Ordinance. Mr. Koenig indicated that the FY 16 authorization for staff of 359 employees would be reduced through adoption of the budget to 354 full-time equivalents. He stated that the Ordinance reflected the debate and discussion that occurred during the Special Council Meeting - Budget Review. Mr. Koenig thanked Council and staff who contributed input to the document, and indicated that staff was looking forward to the implementation of the FY 17 budget. Mr. Slavin thanked Mr. Koenig; Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer; and department heads for their tireless efforts in preparing the budget. He noted that there had been approximately 10 hours of budget hearings throughout the course of a week and, thanks to the work of Council members and staff, they had returned a budget that Mr. Slavin felt the City could be pleased with. He noted that there was no property tax rate increase, no hidden fee increases, utility rates remained largely unchanged, and the number of positions had been decreased, which were all of the typical indicators that were wanted. Mr. Slavin stated that an additional property tax that had been assessed against downtown property owners had been eliminated, which would reduce taxes for those in the Business Improvement District (BID). He indicated that the budget was the result of everyone’s hard work over the 10 hours and hundreds of questions that were asked and answered by staff and thanked everyone for their efforts. Mr. Sudler concurred with Mr. Slavin’s remarks to department heads, and he especially thanked Mr. Koenig for getting back to him regarding his concerns pertaining to fleet vehicles, noting that this was done in a very professional and expeditious way. Mr. Lewis quoted Voltaire, stating that “Appreciation is a wonderful thing: It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well.” In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-17 - 2016/2017 CITY OF DOVER BUDGET ORDINANCES FINAL READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-10 AMENDING CHAPTER 2 - ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE IV - OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES, DIVISION 8 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN The First Reading of the Proposed Ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of May 23, 2016. Council President Slavin reminded members of the public that copies of the proposed ordinance were available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or on the City’s website at www.cityofdover.com under “Government.” Mr. Neil moved that the Final Reading of the proposed ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Cole and unanimously carried. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that Proposed Ordinance #2016-10 would memorialize discussions held in recent months regarding deferred compensation, also known as the 401A Money Purchase Plan. He explained that these changes were part of the collective bargaining agreement associated with the Dover Organization of Employees (DOE) contract. Mr. Koenig stated

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 22 that changes would also be applied to non-bargaining staff moving forward, and the Proposed Ordinance would provide a Code reference to document the plans. Mr. Hare questioned if a minimum contribution of 6% was still included in the ordinance. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that, to his recollection, the content of Council’s motion was that the minimum match for non-bargaining employees would remain at 3% and the maximum would increase to 9%. He indicated that the DOE employees were covered by the collective bargaining agreement and the minimum match would gravitate from 3% to 6% over a time period, with the maximum match increasing to 9%. (City Clerk’s Office Note: During the Regular City Council Meeting of May 23, 2016, members amended Proposed Ordinance #2016-10, the proposal for non- bargaining employees, such that 3% is maintained as the minimum, with the maximum allowable being 9%, and that the increases are at the employee’s option.) Mr. Hare questioned if the minimum for non-bargaining would be 3%, and this was confirmed by Mr. Koenig. Mr. Slavin stated that the Proposed Ordinance that members would be voting on this evening included a minimum contribution of 3%. Mr. Lewis requested clarification regarding the change he had previously requested that contributions would be open to the individual’s discretion. Responding, Mr. Koenig explained that the intent was that the minimum contribution for non-bargaining employees would remain as it is today at 3%, but the maximum contribution would gravitate up in accordance with the schedule that was previously identified. He indicated that the maximum match for non-bargaining employees would go to 8% on July 1, 2016. Responding to Mr. Slavin, Mr. Koenig confirmed that the contribution would be at the discretion of the employee. Mr. Hare moved to adopt Ordinance #2016-10, seconded by Mr. Neil. Mr. Anderson stated that he still had the same concern he had before, which was that he believed the City should have a maximum level of contribution. By a roll call vote of eight (8) yes (Sudler, Neil, Lewis, Cole, Hosfelt, Hare, Hutchison, and Slavin) and one (1) no (Anderson), Council adopted Ordinance #2016-10, as follows: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: That Chapter 2 - Administration, Article IV - Officers and Employees, Division 8 - Deferred Compensation Plan of the Dover Code be amended to read as follows: DIVISION 8. - DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 23 Sec. 2-391. - Definitions; interpretation. (a) Terms defined. As indicated in this division, unless the context otherwise clearly indicates or the deferred compensation plans contradict, the following terms shall mean as indicated below: Eligible employee means any person regularly employed in rendering service to the city on a full-time basis who is not participating in any retirement plan to which the city contributes for them and whose compensation is paid directly by the city. An employee will be considered a full-time employee if he/she regularly works 40 hours each week. Participant means any eligible employee of the city who has met all of the requirements for participation in the deferred compensation plan and has, upon employment, made an irrevocable election to participate in the deferred compensation plan as defined in this subsection (a) and who has satisfied all the conditions and requirements set forth in this division and in the provisions of the plans. (Code 1981, § 2-211; Ord. of 4-25-1994; Ord. of 5-22-2000; Ord. of 6-12-2000; Ord. of 7-10-2000; Ord. of 9-11-2000) Sec. 2-392. - Established; purpose. There is hereby established the city employee deferred compensation plan. The purpose of the plan is to establish the basic terms and conditions under which employees shall participate in this plan. Further details, terms and conditions under which retirement, termination, and survivor benefits shall be provided to eligible employees are defined in the deferred compensation plan. (Code 1981, § 2-212; Ord. of 4-25-1994; Ord. of 5-22-2000; Ord. of 6-12-2000; Ord. of 7-10-2000; Ord. of 9-11-2000) Sec. 2-393. - Eligibility of participants. Each eligible employee not drawing any retirement benefits from the city as of May 1, 1994, who makes an irrevocable decision to join the deferred compensation plan, shall, upon compliance with the provisions of this division, become a deferred compensation plan participant on May 1, 1994. Thereafter, each eligible employee who selects the deferred compensation plan upon employment shall become a participant in accordance with the plan. All new employees, except police officers, hired after September 28, 2009 are required to join the defined contribution pension plan as defined in subsection 2-324. (Code 1981, § 2-213; Ord. of 4-25-1994; Ord. of 5-22-2000; Ord. of 7-10-2000) Sec. 2-394. - Contributions. (a) Employee contributions. For each year while a participant of the deferred compensation plan, a participant shall contribute, by payroll deductions, a percentage of his/her compensation

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 24 as defined in the deferred compensation plan, which shall be a participant's base pay, plus scheduled overtime, payment for being on-call, except those hours reported for being called out, and any retroactive pay corrections which involve any one of the mentioned payments, up to the legal limits as defined in the deferred compensation plan. (b) Employer contributions. The city shall contribute an amount equal to each individual's employee contributions, to a maximum percentage of an employee's compensation as defined in the deferred compensation plan, which shall be a participant's base pay, plus scheduled overtime, payment for being on-call, except those hours reported for being called out, and any retroactive pay corrections which involve any one of the mentioned payments for each participant. (c) Treatment. Treatment of contributions shall be handled in accordance with federal and state laws and the applicable provisions of section 2-341 pertaining to the general employee pension plan. (Code 1981, § 2-214; Ord. of 4-25-1994; Ord. of 5-22-2000; Ord. of 6-12-2000; Ord. of 7-10-2000; Ord. of 9-11-2000) ADOPTED: JUNE 13, 2016 CITY MANAGER’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, thanked staff for the efforts put forth in the FY 16 budget year. He expressed excitement about entering into the FY 17 budget year and thanked Council for listening to staff, making suggestions, and moving the budget process along to deliver the FY 17 budget. COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Slavin extended early wishes for a happy birthday to Councilman Hutchison. Mr. Sudler thanked the National Council on Agricultural Life and Labor Research Fund, Inc. (NCALL); the Cen-Del Foundation, especially Ms. Tenish Gregory, Executive Assistant; and Police Chief Paul Bernat and the Dover Police Department for participating in a community event which helped to bring all communities together. He stated that turnout was great and the event was awesome. He thanked everyone who participated. Mr. Hare reminded everyone that on Tuesday, June 21, 2016 there would be a Second District community meeting at the Capitol Baptist Church at 7:00 p.m. that would be open to anyone who would like to come. Mr. Hosfelt stated that the Firefly Music Festival would be held later in the week. He extended appreciation to City staff for all that the City had done for the Festival to this point. Mr. Anderson thanked the citizens and City staff for participating consistently with the neighborhood watches that had been performed over the past year to year-and-a-half. He indicated that they were an important part of the community and provided necessary feedback. Mr. Anderson particularly

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2016 PAGE 25 thanked the Police Department and the Planning Department’s code enforcement staff for their participation. Mr. Anderson advised that at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 23, 2016 there would be a pizza and politics event at Romano’s Restaurant, located on Walker Road across from the old Dover High School. He invited anyone who wanted to drop by and talk one-on-one. Mr. Anderson noted that not everyone likes to stand up and speak in front of a forum; however, quiet people have valuable ideas as well. He stated that his telephone number is on the City’s website. Mr. Anderson indicated that he and Mr. Sudler would be announcing another town hall meeting in July, noting that these meetings had been quite successful. He looked forward to this continued partnership, noting that there was important information regarding grants and monies available through First State Community Action Agency. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:47 p.m. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All ordinances, resolutions, motions, and orders adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of June 13, 2016, are hereby approved. ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /TM S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Council-Minutes\2016\06-13-2016.wpd

City of Dover Council Briefing – June 27, 2016 Background: First State has been empowering people and Changing lives for more than 50 years (since 1965). Only Community Action Agency in Delaware with offices in each county. More than 20+ programs.. H.E.L.P. (Healthy Home, Energy Efficiency, Lead Safe, People Centric) Program  Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction (DeLead) Program, Summer Cooling Assistance Program (SCAP), Replace Repair Heaters and Conserve Energy (RRHACE) Program, Workforce Development - “Today’s Reinvestment Around Industry Needs” (TRAIN) 1

H.E.L.P. Program 1. LIHEAP Summer Cooling Assistance Program (SCAP) – Statewide a. Base Year 2016 + 4 Option Years b. Benchmarks – 650 Air Conditioners & 650 Energy Conservation Kits (EcoKit) installed with client education using Subcontractors 2. LIHEAP Replace Repair Heaters & Conserve Energy (RRHACE) – Statewide a. Base Year + 4 Option Years b. Benchmarks – 450 Repairs & Replacements c. 81 Healthy Home Interventions based on 29 Hazards d. LIHEAP Assurance 16 Training & Education e. Data Tracking & Evaluation Plan with Analytical Outcomes 2

H.E.L.P. Program 3. DPH Lead Paint Hazard Reduction (DeLead) – Kent & Sussex County a. 3 Year Award ends 11-30-17. b. Two more option periods of 3 years each – Overall 9 Year Contract c. Benchmarks – 250 Completed Homes, 160 Healthy Home Interventions, 40 Community members trained 4. DOL Today’s Reinvestment around Industry Needs (TRAIN) a. Phase 1 to develop a Training Plan by 5-31-16 – DONE b. Phase 2 Implementation pending award c. Create two credentialed positions titled “Q(Quick)-HELP” Assessor and “Energy Educator” d. DelTec Training Provider, DHA Housing Stock Provider, SEU CEC Initiative, Energy Efficiency Legislation (SB-150) & Exelon Merger Funding Sources to create JOBS 3

City DE PUBLIC DHSS (Gateway) DNREC Manager’s HEALTH DSSC 15 State (DeLead Partner) Office (Grantee) Service Centers DeLead funds 40 Community Job Applicants Planning & Community Development JOBS Employers CITY OF DOVER Service Providers Delaware Contractors Hub Emergency Dover Public Tech NPO’s Management Library / Public (Office Space) Affairs “Communities of Promise” Houses of Capital Housing Councilman Leaders Find School Stock Job Applicants Worship 4th District Partnership Partnership Partnership DOL TRAIN Plan / Implementation DELEAD - SERVICE DELIVERY MODEL

H.E.L.P. Program How can the City of Dover H.E.L.P.? (1) DeLead Plan of Actions & Milestones – Planning & Implementation Strategy (Map Illustration) (2) SCAP Plan of Actions & Milestones – Community Awareness Campaign (3) RRHACE Plan – Identify Owner Occupied No Heat & Healthy Home Deficient Housing Stock (4) Workforce Development (TRAIN) Implementation Award – Pray 5

COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2016-07 A RESOLUTION PROPOSING INCLUSION OF WESTFIELD INTO THE KENT COUNTY STORM WATER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT WHEREAS, pursuant to 9 Del. C. §5202 et.seq. and Chapter 187 §90.4E(1) of the Kent County Code, a Petition to extend the stormwater maintenance district for the area known as Westfield was submitted by a majority of the real property owners within the proposed district; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 187 §90.4.E(2) of the Kent County Code, the Kent Conservation District inspected the stormwater management facilities for the proposed stormwater maintenance district, identified required repairs, and developed an operation and maintenance plan; and WHEREAS, the property owners of Westfield have requested the Stormwater Maintenance District Complete the required repairs to be repaid over a period of five (5) years; and WHEREAS, Chapter 187 §90.4.E.(7) of the Kent County Code requires that for subdivisions and land developments located within incorporated areas, the petition shall be accompanied by evidence of concurrence of the local governing body. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the proposed stormwater maintenance district expansion is adequate and appropriate; and 2. That all of the property owners within the district are benefitted directly or indirectly thereby; and 3. That it is in the public interest to extend the stormwater maintenance district in the manner proposed; and 4. That the stormwater maintenance infrastructure within Westfield, exclusive of that within Delaware Department of Transportation/City of Dover right-of-way, shall be maintained in accordance with the Operation and Maintenance Plan and that maintenance may include routine maintenance and shall include regular minor and major maintenance as well as emergency repairs as needed, as defined by Chapter 187 §90.4.B of the Kent County Code; and 5. That the inclusion of Westfield within the Stormwater Maintenance District and the resulting infrastructure maintenance managed by the County shall take precedence over any homeowner obligation for stormwater management included in declarations of restrictions or similar development agreements. Any common open space or infrastructure within a community not maintained as part of a stormwater maintenance district shall remain the responsibility of the homeowners; and 6. Inclusion of Westfield with the Stormwater Maintenance District shall not exempt lot owners within the subdivision from participation in a stormwater utility should one be established by the City of Dover; and

Council Resolution No. 2016-07 Proposing Inclusion of Westfield into the Kent County Storm Water Maintenance District Page 2 7. That the City of Dover Council concurs with the extension of the Stormwater Maintenance District – Westfield. ADOPTED: * _______________________________________ _____________________________________ ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN TIMOTHY A. SLAVIN MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE The Council Committee of the Whole Meeting was held on June 14, 2016 at 6:13 p.m., with Council President Slavin presiding (departed at 6:15 p.m. and returned at 6:17 p.m.). Members of Council present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Sudler, Mr. Neil (arrived at 6:15 p.m., departed at 6:42 p.m., returned at 6:45 p.m., departed at 7:07 p.m., returned at 7:10 p.m., departed at 7:36 p.m., and returned at 7:40 p.m.), Mr. Lewis (departed at 6:53 p.m.), Mr. Cole, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Hosfelt and Mayor Christiansen were absent. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Caldwell and Mrs. Horsey (Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement), Ms. Arndt and Mr. Blakeman (Utility), and Mr. Shevock and Ms. Stewart (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee meeting was held with Chairman Sudler presiding. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Program Presentation - First State Community Action Agency Mr. Charles Kistler, Program Manager, First State Community Action Agency (FSCAA), advised members that FSCAA is a non-profit organization and is the only Community Action Partnership (CAP) agency in the State of Delaware. He reviewed a presentation entitled “City of Dover Council Briefing - June 13, 2016,” stating that FSCAA has more than 20 programs. Referring to Page 2 of the presentation, Mr. Kistler reviewed the components of the organization’s Healthy Home, Energy Efficiency, Lead Safe, and People Centric (H.E.L.P.) Program, as follows: 1) Department of Public Health (DPH) Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction (DeLead) Program - Mr. Kistler explained that FSCAA’s DeLead program was started in seven (7) targeted zip codes, noting that the two (2) largest zip codes were in the City of Dover, which has some of the oldest housing stock in the State. Mr. Kistler stated that 250 homes were identified as positive for lead, and remediation and abatement was completed, although this was a nominal scratch of the surface. He indicated that City management had been very supportive of this process and had provided documentation on nearly 5,000 homes in the City that were built before 1978. Mr. Kistler explained that 160 Healthy Home Repairs were completed for issues such as pest infestation and mold. 2) Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Summer Cooling Assistance Program (SCAP) - Mr. Kistler advised that FSCAA was in the first year of a five (5) year, Statewide program for SCAP, and City management had been very supportive in getting the exposure needed. He

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 2 noted that, due to extreme temperatures, many more people need air conditioners. Mr. Kistler explained that Energy Conservation Kits (EcoKits) include LED light bulbs, aerators, low-flow shower heads, night lights, door sweeps, and first aid kits. 3) Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Replace Repair Heaters and Conserve Energy (RRHACE) Program - Mr. Kistler stated that the RRHACE Statewide program started last year and is a five (5) year program that provides for repair and replacement of heaters. He noted that before September 30, 2016, 450 heaters would be repaired or replaced. Mr. Kistler indicated that FSCAA would be working with the City’s code enforcement and property development staff to identify people with no heat. 4) Today’s Reinvestment Around Industry Needs (TRAIN) Program - Mr. Kistler stated that FSCAA had submitted a training plan to the Department of Labor for approval. This program would allow FSCAA to go into communities, identify those who would be eligible for training through community leaders, bring those individuals through a vocational technology program, and put them into jobs in their own neighborhoods, which FSCAA has termed “Communities of Promise.” Mr. Kistler stated that they had asked the City of Dover to write a letter of support for this program, and if FSCAA reaches the implementation phase of this large initiative, they will start to recruit individuals to help their own communities. Mr. Kistler, referring to page 2 of the FSCAA presentation, reviewed the H.E.L.P. - Hub and Spoke Service Delivery Model, explaining that Communities of Promise had been identified as concentrated areas of poverty where community leaders could identify people to be brought in through the Delaware Technical Community College (DTCC) system through a workforce development training plan. Mr. Kistler stated that FSCAA DeLead program has a contractual obligation to identify and train up to 40 people in the Renovation, Repair, and Painting (RRP) formal certification program. He expressed the desire to certify as many people as possible in these communities and put them to work with contractors who perform lead work, creating a path forward for participants. Mr. Kistler indicated that FSCAA is working with DPH in regard to the DeLead Program and with the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) regarding the RRHACE and SCAP programs, and these entities were funding the activity that the agency has planned for the next five (5) years. Mr. Kistler explained that FSCAA had partnerships in place related to the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) weatherization program, Senate Bill 150, the Clean Power Plan (CPP), and the Sustainable Energy Utility (SEU) to identify available funding and craft programs for low-income families. He noted that FSCAA was trusted to be able to identify programs that will bring self-sufficiency to their clients in the communities. Mr. Kistler explained that DHSS and utility providers are gateways that clients are moving through to be identified, have their needs assessed, and effectively apply to programs.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 3 Mr. Kistler stated that FSCAA is working with an analytical firm from Princeton, New Jersey to develop analytical data to back up that the investment being made in these programs has a legitimate outcome. He informed members that the City was helping FSCAA to share and collaborate on data and was playing a major part in identifying needs in concentrated areas of poverty in the City. He indicated that the Delaware Housing Authority, Wilmington Housing Authority, and Dover Housing Authority needed to identify the properties in the cities that are deficient so that financial resources can be pooled and existing talent can be used to implement programs with good outcomes. Mr. Kistler stated that houses of worship would also be key because of the trust factor. He noted that the City of Dover is the hub of the model. Mr. Kistler, referring to page 4 of the presentation, reviewed the H.E.L.P. Program. He indicated that the FSCAA was not necessarily asking for money, but that his request was more about being able to work collaboratively toward data collection and demographics in the City to leverage combined resources. Mr. Kistler reviewed the ways that the City of Dover could support the Program, as follows: 1) DeLead Collaboration Plan - Mr. Kistler reiterated that there were 5,000 pre- 1978 properties that are candidates for this program, noting that children under six (6) years old living in those houses could potentially be poisoned. It was unknown whether or not they were poisoned as there was no requirement to have the children tested. Mr. Kistler indicated that the City Manager had put FSCAA in touch with the superintendent of the school systems, and they were starting to craft a relationship to identify kids that could be tested and match this up against the properties. This would provide a focused idea of where properties are with children who could potentially be poisoned by lead paint and allow them to act. 2) SCAP Collaboration Plan - Mr. Kistler indicated that FSCAA has offices in all three (3) counties, including one (1) in the Blue Hen Mall; however, they do not have a brick and mortar appearance as a community action agency in the forefront and need this. He advised that mass intake is performed every week for the summer cooling program in different counties. Mr. Kistler stated that they were disappointed that more people were not signing up for the program, noting that they sometimes have only 13 people per day at the Blue Hen Mall, and they should have hundreds. He indicated that the FSCAA is asking for help to raise awareness. Mr. Kistler noted that there are eligibility requirements, including being over the age of 60, having medically proven breathing issues such as COPD or asthma, having children, being medically challenged, etc. He stated that FSCAA would have 650 air conditioners by September 30, 2016. 3) RRHACE Collaboration Plan - Mr. Kistler stated that they have 450 heating units to be completed by September 30, 2016 and have completed 238. He asked for help identifying clients with no heat now to avoid panic in the fall.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 4 4) TRAIN Collaboration Plan - Mr. Kistler stated that if the agency is blessed with a training grant, they would like to return to the City of Dover. He believed that there would be an 18-month implementation period to identify people in the community that could be trained through DTCC as energy educators and quick-help assessors. Mr. Kistler noted that if these individuals can be certified and put to work in an apprenticeship program, they could do some good and create role models for their communities. He advised that a merger had just taken place that affected Delmarva Power, and they were discussing some type of assistance for people who were in the dunning process and bordering on disconnection of their electricity. Mr. Kistler stated that these individuals would be put into a formal training program. He noted that there was only one (1) energy educator in the State and expressed the desire to create more. Mr. Kistler stated the desire to have the utility companies and electric cooperatives bring individuals into these programs and help FSCAA help clients understand how to become more energy efficient, decrease consumption of energy, and apply these savings toward a better quality of life and less dependence on social programs. Mr. Kistler stated the desire to stay in touch with the City. He expressed FSCAA’s belief that the capital of the State is where their master plan should be laid out, reiterating that the City had a big need. He felt the master plan could then be applied to any city in the State. Mr. Hutchison questioned how long the training and certification program would take. Responding, Mr. Kistler stated that if they receive the grant award in July, participants would be brought in to DTCC in September. Certification would be a one (1) to three (3) week process, depending on the type of certification. He explained that resources would be shared, noting that DTCC has some funding for apprenticeships, FSCAA would have funding from the grant, and the employer would be expected to contribute funds. Mr. Kistler stated that they were looking at a 90-day apprenticeship. Mr. Anderson asked Mr. Kistler to elaborate on the FSCAA’s summer jobs program. In response, Mr. Kistler stated that FSCAA will find out in early July if the Department of Labor will approve their training plan, and FSCAA could then provide all relevant information. He noted that all three (3) campuses of DTCC are partnering in regard to workforce development to help train people and get them employed, as is Delmarva Power. Mr. Anderson requested that Mr. Kistler advise him when FSCAA receives information about their grant, noting that he would like to share with Mr. Kistler the names of 400 people who need jobs. Mr. Anderson asked if Mr. Kistler needed anything from the City, or if staff needed something from Council in this regard. Responding, Mr. Kirby Hudson, Assistant City Manager, advised that he had been responding to Mr. Kistler’s requests and staff was trying to do what they could to support FSCAA. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, stated that staff wanted FSCAA to come before Council to promote their program, and requested that Council members who prepare newsletters or electronic communications help in this regard. He stated that this was a rare instance where someone was coming to the City with human and financial resources behind them and asking for the City to help

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 5 establish community contacts. Mr. Koenig explained that FSCAA staff had experienced difficulty in getting people to answer their doors when they are out knocking and advised that contacts provided by members could help. He felt this was a wonderful opportunity for the community. Mr. Slavin stated that FSCAA could be placed on the agenda for a Regular City Council meeting, which would be televised and might be an opportunity to get the word out in another venue. Mr. Kistler responded favorably, stating the desire to create as much awareness as possible. Mr. Slavin indicated that the City Clerk’s Office would get in touch with Mr. Kistler. Update - Residential Appeal Process and Non-Compliant/Non-Conforming Uses During their meeting of January 11, 2016, Council approved the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee’s recommendation that staff be requested to prepare a residential appeal process and to also look at those properties within City limits that are clearly non-compliant with the uses to be reviewed by the Committee during their March meeting. During the Council Committee of the Whole/Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee meeting of March 15, 2016, Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, reminded members that the first step in this process would be to determine the degree of the problem with non-conforming uses by finding out how many such uses exist. She advised that her staff had been working with the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) staff in the Public Works Department, and they were in the process of developing an application that would allow the City’s planners to go into the field and document non-conforming uses. Mrs. Townshend stated that staff could then determine which of the non-conforming uses would be permitted as a conditional use, noting that multi-family residential uses would not be permitted any longer in certain residential zones. From that point, a strategy could be developed on how to attrition non-conforming uses. During the Committee meeting of June 14, 2016, Mrs. Townshend stated that two (2) members of the Planning Department staff were going out to identify each non-conforming use in residential zones. In her last discussion with these staff members, the process was moving slower than expected. She advised that one (1) quarter of the geographic area of the City was complete, and they estimated completion in two (2) months. Mrs. Townshend advised that once staff has a picture of non-conforming uses, they would bring forward the language and proposed process to sunset those uses. Mr. Slavin stated appreciation for the effort to complete a 100% census; however, he questioned whether a representative sample could be relied on, noting that this could be approached in broad categories of uses. Responding, Mrs. Townshend stated her understanding that all non-conforming uses in residential zones would be sunsetted and, if this was so, all such uses must be identified. Mr. Slavin questioned if such uses could be sunsetted in a blanket ordinance adopted by Council. He expressed frustration because it was taking a long time to get to a solution, and in the interim non-conforming uses were continuing to cause problems. Mr. Slavin noted that there had been a recent problem, with the root cause being a bar operating in the heart of a neighborhood in the middle of the Fourth District. He indicated that everything the City does, including police enforcement, cameras, street cleaning, and picking up garbage, would not correct the problem until there is no longer a bar in the middle of a residential area.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 6 Mrs. Townshend stated that this could be approached in several ways. She explained that if all non- conforming properties are not sunsetted, there would be a need for fair system to handle them. Mrs. Townshend advised that a section in the Code could be developed under non-conforming uses to deal with those uses that have been determined to be a nuisance and criteria could be set to bring them forward more expeditiously. She indicated that when this matter was considered by the Committee in December, she shared her belief regarding the proper methodology and had stated that it would be very time consuming and labor intensive, and no Council members had told her to do this differently. Mr. Slavin stated his concern regarding the statement that 25% of the properties had been completed in six (6) months and that the other 75% would be completed in two (2) months. In response, Mrs. Townshend explained that staff had to develop a tablet application to be used for this process. She indicated that she had been very up front that this project would take a lot of time and labor. Mrs. Townshend offered to move forward in a different way if that was what Council wanted; however, she explained that she was proceeding in the way that she previously outlined. Mr. Slavin stated that he is sensitive to not micro-managing staff; however, this was taking a little longer than he was comfortable with. Although he did not wish to speak for others, he expressed his opinion of the need to get to a solutions-based approach rather than data gathering. In response to Mr. Hare regarding a retail business that is set up across from K-Mart, Mrs. Townshend explained that this was not a case of non-conforming use, explaining that a business license was issued for this enterprise under policies that existed in the past. She indicated that the business license would expire in the current month, would not be reissued, and the business owner was aware of this. Mrs. Townshend explained that a non-conforming use is a use that was legal when it was established but the zoning had changed so that it is no longer a permitted use. She noted that the most numerous non-conforming uses seen in the City were houses that had been carved into apartments. Mrs. Townshend advised that the Elks’ Club on Kirkwood Street and a liquor store on Forest Street were non-conforming uses. When the issue of non-conforming uses first came up, she spoke with Mr. William Pepper, Deputy City Solicitor, who was very clear that the City needed to be fair and consistent in how non-conforming uses are dealt with, and Mrs. Townshend had used this approach in developing a process. She indicated that if another process were developed, it must be fair and consistent. Mr. Sudler asked if it would be fair to use a process that is complaint driven, since this type of process is used for code enforcement. Responding, Mrs. Townshend stated her belief that if this approach is used, there would need to be some type of due process and non-conforming uses could not be administratively expired. She explained that properties could go to the Board of Adjustment or another body to determine if a non-conforming use should expire, and this would require a Code amendment. Mrs. Townshend indicated that if Council wanted a Code amendment in advance of the other part of the process, she could bring one forward; however, this had not been discussed in the past.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 7 Mr. Anderson expressed appreciation to Mrs. Townshend and her staff for the work being done, noting that this was a lot of work added to what they are already doing. He concurred with Mr. Slavin that it was a bit frustrating, which he stated was why he and Mr. Sudler brought up the idea of a complaint-driven approach several months ago. Mr. Anderson hoped that this would be looked into, noting that all non-conforming uses are not equal. He loved the idea of looking at nuisance non-conforming uses because there are many non-conforming uses that no one knows are there. Mr. Anderson expressed the need to distinguish those uses that are a problem. Now that staff had invested much time and effort into the process, he did not want them to stop, and start a new process; however, he asked if staff could start working on something for nuisances in the community, in the meantime. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Townshend stated that this could happen concurrently. She stated that if nuisances are being dealt with separately and language is added to the Code that specifically sets up a list of criteria and a process, this could be brought forward ahead of the full survey. Mrs. Townshend advised that the approach had started with expiring all non-conforming uses. She reminded members that the language in the Code regarding non-conforming uses in residential zones indicates that these uses would expire 20 years after the adoption of the ordinance or 40 years from initiation of the use. Mrs. Townshend noted that staff was unable to determine when the ordinance was adopted and, without having the full picture, that section of Code cannot be used to say that the 20 years had passed and the uses must expire. She stated that other language could be added to the Code in the meantime that would accomplish this. Mr. Anderson asked if the current research would only identify non-conforming uses or indicate when those uses were granted. Responding, Mrs. Townshend explained that staff’s current fieldwork was identifying the uses, which would be entered in a table. She indicated that other data could be pulled in, but she was unsure if there would be a good data source for exactly when uses started. Mr. Anderson stated the need to be very careful about property rights of those who had invested their life savings; however, he noted that the rights of other people to live in reasonable peace also needed to be protected. He asked if staff was proceeding based on geography or by categories, and questioned which 25% portion of the City had been done and what was outstanding. In response, Mrs. Townshend advised that staff started working on the east side of the City and had gotten to the area east of the highway, and the northern part of the downtown area, north of Mary Street. She stated that when working further west in some of the newer developments, the number of non- conforming uses would decrease and less time would be required. Mrs. Townshend noted that some of the newer developments had been crossed off the list because staff knew there were no such uses. She informed members that staff had started the Fairview area and was moving south. Mrs. Townshend indicated that the next step would be the downtown area, which would be very labor intensive. Mr. Slavin advised that his comments were not reflective of poor work on data gathering; however, he felt that perhaps the results of the work could be used more quickly. He referred to Mrs. Townshend’s comment that the existing section of Code states that non-conforming uses would be expired 20 years after the adoption of that ordinance or 40 years from their initiation. Mr. Slavin stated that this section of Code could be repealed if it no longer serves a purpose and another section could be put in its place to state that as of a certain date, all non-conforming uses in the City are

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 8 repealed and the City will take action against them upon discovery. Mr. Slavin indicated that this approach would be similar to other things done in the City, noting that not everyone is 100% in compliance with the rules, and rules are enforced when non-compliance is found. Referring to houses that had been carved into apartments, he indicated this is the example that he would use to say that they will be corrected when discovered on a case-by-case basis. Mr. Slavin believed that if all properties were addressed at once, the Planning Department would be choked with appeals. He agreed with Mr. Anderson that the City would want to honor legitimate uses, such as a church located in a certain area. Mr. Slavin stated that if staff paused with 25% of the properties complete and asked Council to take the action needed to clean up the Code, which he felt all members would be glad to do, staff could begin the enforcement process with the identified properties. In response to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Slavin did not feel that his suggested approach needed to take the form of a motion. He thought that Mrs. Townshend had heard the concerns and suggested that she return in one (1) month with an update. Citizen Suggestions Mr. Anderson stated that a citizen had advised him that a building had been purchased and was immediately set up for rehabilitation in order to be occupied; however, previous vacant building fines did not reset and the individual had to pay these fines on top of the money for rehabilitation. This citizen suggested that a six (6) month window be allowed for marketing and rehabilitation when there is a transfer like this. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hutchison and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 6:52 p.m. UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee meeting was held with Chairman Cole presiding. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Anderson moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and unanimously carried. Chairman Cole recognized Ms. Tricia Arndt as a new member of the Utility Committee and thanked her for accepting the appointment. Differential Disposal Fee Agreement - Delaware Solid Waste Authority Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that the Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) was created more than 30 years ago to handle municipal waste through the State of Delaware, and the City had a good relationship with the DSWA. He explained that the City is not in the landfill business and has a contractual relationship with the DSWA. Mr. Koenig indicated that the proposed differential disposal fee agreement would memorialize that relationship from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2021. He stated that the gate charge would be reduced for the next

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 9 five (5) years, with the result that spending in FY 2021 would be approximately the same amount that was currently being paid to the DSWA. Mr. Koenig stated that the agreement would offer a rebate and set the gate charge at $85 per ton. The prescriptive rebate would be included on the City’s bill that would be issued twice per year, on February 15th and August 15th for that year of tonnage. Mr. Koenig stated that in recent history, all of these agreements had come before Council for approval; however, he noted that the City does not have another place to take its waste in the State of Delaware, and it would not be desired to cross state lines with waste. He advised that the contract being presented was the same contract being offered to all municipalities in the State. Staff recommended authorizing the City Manager to execute the proposed Differential Disposal Fee Agreement with the Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) to provide municipal solid waste disposal service for the City of Dover from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2021 at the rates set forth in the agreement. Mr. Blakeman moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Quarterly Review of Utility Related Capital Investment Plan (CIP) (Electric and Water/Wastewater) (January, February, and March) Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed the Quarterly Report for the Capital Investment Plan (CIP) as of March 31, 2016. He advised that this report was prepared by the Finance Department and summarizes the finances for each project identified in the CIP. In regard to Water/Wastewater Improvement & Extension Fund - Major CIP Projects, Mr. Koenig noted that a number of projects were listed as being in process, explaining that staff had been diligently working through the capital plan. He stated that construction timelines do not match budget timelines, and some project carry-forwards must be rebudgeted. Mr. Koenig advised that when project budget difficulties have occurred, staff came before Council to amend project budgets; however, projects were generally moving forward. He stated that staff had gravitated toward doing design features for water/sewer projects during the first year, with construction typically occurring the next year. Mr. Koenig indicated that this routine had been used, for example, for pump station upgrades. He noted that staff had been working for some time on the 1M gallon elevated storage tank location. Mr. Koenig reminded members that staff had proposed a location several years ago that met with public resistance. Since that time, staff had been negotiating a second site and had passed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) back and forth with a property owner for the better part of a year. Mr. Koenig stated that the attorneys had finished their reviews and it was believed that final closure of that location was close. He informed members that once a final MOU is signed, staff would come back before Council to discuss how that project would move forward. Mr. Koenig stated that this was the longest running project. Mr. Koenig stated that the Garrison improvements had been constructed and were in place. Staff was working on project closeout documentation and final release of payments. A number of current projects were progressing with construction. In regard to electric components of the CIP, Mr. Koenig advised that Mr. Harry Maloney, Electric Director, had completed the General Scott Switchgear project. The station was in operation and the project would be closed out this fiscal year. The Garrison Oak Transmission Line Relocation was

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 10 complete, as was construction of the Van Sant Capacity Increase, and project documentation would be closed out. Mr. Koenig stated that the Electric Department had done a very good job of working through the capital plan. He advised members that Mr. Maloney had staff in place so that design features could be completed in-house or externally, projects could move through the capital system to completion, and the assets could be put in operation. Mr. Koenig stated that he was very happy with the work that had been done both on the Public Works side under the water/sewer utility and the electric side and believed that the City’s customers could see the benefits of these systems being improved over time. Updates Green Energy Funding and Programming Members reviewed details regarding Green Energy Funding and Programming, as of April 21, 2016. National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that staff had been exchanging a document related to the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit back and forth with the Department of Natural Resources and Control (DNREC) and it was expected to be finalized in the next 30-60 days. He noted that staff had been working on compliance issues over the last year to year-and-a-half. Mr. Koenig indicated that the City’s Environmental Scientist, who was heading up this program, had left the City to work in the private sector and this position would be advertised shortly so that permit compliance can be resolved. Mr. Koenig stated that staff was starting to get all of the permit activities embedded into the operations of the Public Works Department and other departments that have influence on the permit. He felt that the City was moving toward compliance, noting that the FY 17 budget has many items that are cost drivers for the Public Works Department that are related to compliance, including monitoring and operational issues. Mr. Koenig informed members that the City was working through the system to achieve compliance at the DNREC level. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Utility Committee meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sudler and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:03 p.m. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting was held with Chairman Hare presiding. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and unanimously carried. Mr. Hare welcomed Dr. Courtney Stewart, who previously served on the Utility Committee, as a new member of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 11 Kent County Secondary Intensive Learning Center School Resource Officer (SRO) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Police Chief Paul Bernat advised members that the City of Dover Police Department currently has a partnership with the Capital School District and has three (3) School Resource Officers (SROs), one (1) at Dover High School, one (1) at Central Middle School, and one (1) at Parkway Academy Central. The District pays $100,000 for the officers at Dover High School and Central Middle School and $60,000 for the SRO at Parkway Academy Central. He indicated that there is also a Gang Resistance Education and Awareness Training (GREAT) officer. Chief Bernat requested permission to enter into another agreement with the Kent County Secondary Intensive Learning Center (ILC) School for another SRO. He explained that he had met with Dr. Dan Shelton, Superintendent, Capital School District, and his staff and developed an agreement similar to the Parkway Academy Central agreement. Chief Bernat informed members that the Police Department is authorized 101 police officers and there would be a resignation effective June 30, 2016. He stated that he would like to remain at a strength of 101 officers, send a police officer to the Academy in September, and enter into this agreement with the Capital School District for FY 17, FY 18, and FY 19. Staff recommended authorizing the Chief of Police to negotiate and sign the final Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the placement of a School Resource Officer (SRO) at the Kent County Secondary Intensive Learning Center site for the next three (3) years (FY 2017, FY 2018 and FY 2019). Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. Disposition of Excess Property - 29 South Governors Avenue and 749 West North Street Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, informed members that the City had acquired several properties over the years through demolition of structures, subsequent levying of the demolition liens, and acquiring these properties through sheriff’s sales. He indicated that 29 South Governors Avenue and 749 West North Street had been declared excess property by Council; however, in the declaration, Mr. Koenig was required to dispose of them using the standard method of disposition, which is typically the public bidding process. These properties were advertised for public bid last year and no offers were received. Mr. Koenig advised that staff was preparing to put these properties out for bid again; however, Mr. Michael Maupin, Managing Director, MauTiste Investment Group, submitted an unsolicited bid for these properties. Mr. Koenig stated that, Mr. William Pepper, Deputy City Solicitor, had indicated that it would not be a good idea for Mr. Koenig to act on this administratively and that he should bring this matter before Council for their recommendation on accepting the proposals. Mr. Koenig noted that the offered price for 29 South Governors Avenue was $8,000 and for 749 West North Street was $18,000, for a total of $26,000. Mr. Koenig stated that demolition and other related expenses had been identified, and if these offers were accepted the City would have to write off approximately $17,718.35 in loss; however, the properties would be put back into private sector hands. He advised that Mr. Maupin intended to develop the properties and, once developed, they would go back on the tax rolls. Mr. Koenig believed one (1) of the properties was located in the Downtown Development District (DDD), and depending on how they are redeveloped, the property that is not in the DDD would go back on the tax rolls immediately. The tax rebate guidelines for the DDD would apply to the other property in the DDD. Mr. Koenig

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 12 stated that, in general, these redevelopments would be positive for the City since there would be new structures, hopefully owner-occupied homes, and there would no longer be vacant pieces of land. He noted that currently the City was incurring cost to mow the grass and dispose of any debris. Staff recommended authorizing the City Manager to accept the offers from MauTiste Investment Group in the amount of $8,000 for 29 South Governors Avenue and $18,000 for 749 West North Street and write-off the remaining expenses and charges in the combined amount of $17,718.35 for these properties. Mr. Koenig advised that Mr. Maupin was present and had provided an updated letter, dated June 9, 2026, stating that the Mautiste Investment Group is prepared to extend the expiration date of their offer to purchase the properties (Attachment #1). Mr. Koenig noted that the previously provided letter had expired. Mr. Shevock asked if the properties would remain exempt from taxes until a house is actually built. Responding, Mr. Koenig explained that the property at 749 West North Street is not in the DDD; therefore, the purchaser would have to pay FY 17 property taxes on the raw land and may be subject to additional taxes on improvements made in FY 17. He indicated that the property at 29 South Governors Avenue would potentially be in the DDD, and improvements made to the property would not necessarily go onto the tax rolls immediately since there is a roll-in period for new improvements. Mr. Koenig stated that the purchaser would most likely have to pay the land tax associated with this property, but if improvements are made in the near future, the roll-in for full property tax value of the land and structure would be in accordance with the district guidelines. Mr. Shevock moved to recommend authorizing the City Manager to accept the offers from MauTiste Investment Group in the amount of $8,000 for 29 South Governors Avenue and $18,000 for 749 West North Street and write-off the remaining expenses and charges in the combined amount of $17,718.35 for these properties, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hutchison and unanimously carried. Discussion - Tax Account Delinquency Listing Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reminded members that he had previously sent the Tax Account Delinquency Listing as of May 31, 2016 to members of Council and indicated that he would be willing to discuss placing the list on the City’s website during a Committee meeting. He informed members that staff had previously posted this listing on the City of Dover website going back to 2011-2012; however, it had stopped being updated on the website. He stated that he would like to start posting the list on the website to encourage people to review it and become non-delinquent. Mr. Koenig noted that delinquencies on the list range from a few dollars because of late charges, etc., to thousands of dollars because people do not want to, or have not paid their taxes. He advised that staff was looking for the lowest cost way to get delinquent taxes collected and staff had done a good job in addressing this over the last couple of years. Mr. Koenig informed members that as of June 1, 2016, approximately $111,0000 in tax delinquency was due from all years. Mr. Koenig noted that the list included locations that are familiar to everyone, where payment has not been made for one (1) reason or another. He expressed the desire to minimize the amount of time needed for staff to reach out to these people to encourage them to make their accounts current.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 13 Mr. Anderson expressed his opinion that there should be a $10 or $25 level in the list that screens delinquencies, stating that someone may think they are paid up and be suddenly put on a public list because they owe a small amount. He believed this is excessive and ridiculous. Mr. Anderson stated that something may be listed in error and did not wish to unnecessarily embarrass people for a small delinquency, such as $5.83. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that he understood Mr. Anderson’s point and Council could create a bar if they desired; however, he felt that any bar above zero (0) would have some outstanding balances on it. While in some cases these delinquencies were relatively minor, Mr. Koenig indicated that there are accounting issues that must be cleaned up whether the amount owed is $5.83, $50.83, or $500.83, and the City still has an obligation to collect it. He explained that Mr. William Pepper, Deputy City Solicitor, had advised that staff did not have the right to write-off penalties. Mr. Koenig stated that these parties had been notified that monies were due and still had not paid outstanding bills, so the City was incurring dollars to send notifications. He did not believe the City should be incurring those costs but should post the list to encourage people to look at it and pay all amounts owed. Mr. Anderson stated that posting the list would not alleviate staff from having to do the other items. He felt that just because the list is posted did not mean that the party would see it. Mr. Anderson believed, at the very least, that the party would pay the penalty when they see it on their next property tax bill. In response, Mr. Koenig stated that this is potentially correct; however, the charge may carry forward and not be paid the next time. He indicated that he was looking for people to call their neighbors and friends to say that an amount is owed, which would mean more than the City asking them to pay the fee. Mr. Koenig noted that it is a time-consuming process for staff to call or send letters to people on a list, such as the current 14-page list, to inform them that they will not be bothered if they are below a $25 threshold and the fee will carry over to the next year. He felt that this would be time consuming and put staff at a greater disadvantage regarding why one (1) party is called versus another. Mr. Koenig reiterated that he wanted people to pay the fees because they are owed to the City. Mr. Anderson questioned why the list would not just be flagged in the computer so that customers who come in to pay their electric, water, and sewer bill would be asked by Customer Service if they would like to pay any delinquent taxes owed. He felt this would be more effective in collecting the money. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that this may be easier to do as the City upgrades to the Enterprise Resource Program (ERP). He had not examined the screen at Customer Service to see if there is a flag that pops up regarding taxes when someone pays their electric bill, so he was unsure if this was possible; however, he pointed out that this would be another step incurred at the administrative level and there would be a cost for this. Although he could not detail the cost at this time, he noted that it would equate to some dollar amount. Mr. Slavin expressed confusion about why the City would want to coddle those who do not pay their bills on time. He stated that the City is compassionate when people face issues in paying for their utilities. This takes only one (1) conversation with the customer, and they are then accommodated by setting up any kind of payment plan that they need. Mr. Slavin felt that there were some people on the list that fall into this category; however, he did not believe that everyone did. He advised that there were names on the list that he and others in the room recognized as people of means in the community who had chosen not to pay their bills on time and have the City incur additional costs to have them paid. Mr. Slavin felt that 98% of the property owners pay their bills on time and 2%

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 14 require staff time to chase down. He felt it would be prudent to put the word out, noting that the list is a matter of public record that had already been included in a City Council meeting packet. Mr. Slavin stated that he supported what Mr. Koenig and Mr. Kirby Hudson, Assistant City Manager, had been trying to do on this matter and in regard to utility payments. He also supported the compassion customers had been shown by Customer Service agents in dealing with those who cannot pay on time. Mr. Cole agreed with Mr. Slavin. Referring to Mr. Koenig’s comment that the delinquency list had been posted in the past, Mr. Cole questioned why this was discontinued. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that he was unsure. He advised that at one time there was a link to the list on the home page of the website. Mr. Koenig noted that if a list is posted on July 1st, when the tax bills go out, the list has hundreds of pages, so it would not be appropriate to post it at that time. He thought perhaps that staff stopped posting it at the end of a fiscal year and, for some reason, it did not get posted as it became a truly delinquent list. Mr. Hare asked if the City is able to issue business licenses for those with delinquent taxes. Responding, Mr. Koenig advised that controls have been put in place for business licenses, building permits, and development applications to invoke clean hands. He stated that all departments are aware of the Clean Hands Ordinance. Mr. Koenig indicated that he could not say that staff takes advantage of every opportunity with respect to the Ordinance; however, this issue is sometimes caught by the Planning Department, Customer Service, and City Manager’s Office. He stated that as the City potentially replaces its financial systems, it will probably become easier to catch these issues, noting that currently it is sometimes necessary to go into multiple screens to find out what is owed. Mr. Hare stated that some of the delinquencies are quite large and are known businesses, and they should be made note of when it is time to renew licenses. Mr. Koenig stated that staff had worked on whittling down the delinquency listing and the backlog at Customer Service. He advised members that when August 31st arrives and FY 17 is delinquent, he would ideally like to send out a very direct Clean Hands letter saying that if a party does not pay soon, the City reserves the right to cut their power. Mr. Koenig noted that this would not be customer friendly and he was trying to balance reality with getting the bills paid. He indicated that it would be difficult to send this letter out because it could affect business operations. Mr. Koenig explained that, in some cases, people have triple net leases where the property owner may have had to pay the property tax, is waiting for a business to pay him, and everyone is pointing their finger at someone else. He felt that as this message gets stronger to the residential and business communities, people will pay on time and staff will not have to send additional letters because people will know that if they do not pay on time and keep current, they will be subject to disconnection. Mr. Koenig stated that some businesses do not mind accruing a late penalty and do not provide an explanation as to why they are not offended by the late penalty accruing. He advised that they hold the money and pay the tax when it is convenient for them or when the City threatens a sheriff’s sale or gets into the issue of Clean Hands.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 15 Whatcoat Village Revitalization Payment-in-Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. had proposed the revitalization of Whatcoat Village, 992 Whatcoat Village Drive. Mr. Koenig referred to the draft Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) agreement between the City of Dover and Whatcoat Community Development, Inc., explaining that this was very similar to a previous discussion regarding the revitalization of the Walker Woods development by the Milford Housing Development Corporation. Mr. Koenig explained that the owner of Whatcoat Village Apartments had applied for tax exemption through the City of Dover Board of Assessment Appeals, which was approved because of the 501(c)(3) designation and their history of qualifying for this designation. He advised that Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. wanted to be a good neighbor and had offered a PILOT agreement. This agreement was similar to the Milford Housing Development Corporation agreement that was executed for the redevelopment of Walker Woods and was prepared by the same attorney. Mr. Koenig indicated that the City Manager’s Office was supportive of the proposed agreement, noting that he would like to discuss minor adjustments to the agreement with the attorney in order to finalize it. He noted that the Walker Woods agreement had a small escalator that was not included in this draft agreement. Mr. Koenig advised that in the case of Walker Woods, Council reviewed the draft agreement and turned it over to Mr. Koenig to finalize, and it was placed on file with the City Clerk’s and Tax Assessor’s Offices. He noted that the proposed agreement is different from Walker Woods where the City released a road right-of-way. In this instance there would not be the same release of property. Staff recommended authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a final agreement with Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. regarding a proposed PILOT agreement for Whatcoat Village located at 992 Whatcoat Village Drive. Mr. Hutchison asked if a strong management program would be in place to oversee operations on a day-to-day basis. Responding, Ms. Vandana Sareen, Vice President of Development, Michaels Development Company, stated that Mr. William Hill was serving as Chairman of the Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. board. Ms. Sareen indicated that they were working together as partners to redevelop the 78-unit project. She explained that Interstate Realty Management would be the management agent and management was available onsite. In response to Mr. Hutchison as to whether they had experience, Ms. Sareen stated that the community was developed approximately 35 years ago and there had been no capital improvements at the property since. Ten years ago, Interstate Realty Management, which is an arm of the Michaels Development Company, was hired by Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. to perform management. They had now received some funding to help bring the units to current market standards and improve the physical assets of the property. Ms. Sareen stated that a lot of upgrades would be done; however, affordable housing tenants would still be targeted and the population served would be similar to the current population. Mr. Sudler moved to recommend authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a final agreement with Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. regarding a proposed PILOT agreement for Whatcoat Village located at 992 Whatcoat Village Drive, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Mr. Anderson thanked Whatcoat Community Development, Inc. for entering into this agreement and hoped that others would do the same.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 16 Evaluation of Requests for Proposals Collection Agency Services Mr. Kirby Hudson, Assistant City Manager, informed members that on May 22, 2003, the City entered into a contract with Capital Credit Services, which was subsequently acquired by First Collect, which came to fruition on September 1, 2014. He stated that a number of City customers had accounts that were at or above $90,000, and First Collect was having a difficult time collecting because many parties were moving out of the general area where the collections agency was licensed to pursue them. Mr. Hudson stated that it became paramount to engage an agency that could collect in all 50 states, noting that Dover is a transient area with many military and college students. Mr. Hudson indicated that the contract with First Collect does not have an expiration date; however, there is a stipulation that either party can submit a 30-day letter to be released from the contract. Mr. Hudson advised members that staff was recommending removing the current collection agency and moving on to a new agency based on a Request for Proposals (RFP) that was issued several months ago. Members were provided a document entitled “City of Dover Collection Agency Services Contract, RFP Number 16-0033CM” (Attachment #2) and Mr. Hudson reviewed the Decision Scale regarding RFP submissions. Members were advised that candidates chosen were licensed and authorized to collect in all fifty (50) states; provide skip tracing, scrubs, and credit bureau reporting. The three (3) major credit reporting agencies are Experian, Trans Union, and Equifax. The importance of these factors are directly related to the City of Dover’s ability to collect military accounts as well as other transient accounts. All companies listed offer services similar in nature and are comparable in terms of auto dialer and times calls, paper correspondence, and consumer dispute resolution. Each company has provided a Collectors Code of Ethics and regulatory requirements for Federal, State, and Local Guidelines; to include Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Mr. Hudson indicated that of the eight (8) proposals received, three (3) companies were considered to be the top candidates: SIMM Associates, Inc., Penn Credit Corporation, and Progressive Financial. Based on the criteria (10-point scale), SIMM Associates, Inc., provided positive scoring in all areas except minority business. If positive negotiations were to fail, it was recommended that Penn Credit be considered. Mr. Hudson pointed out that there was an error in the Recommended Action section of the Committee Action Form previously provided. He explained that, although it had been indicated that “Fees are based on a percentage of revenue collected,” this was incorrect and the City would pay nothing for collection services. He explained that currently anyone who goes to collections with First Credit must pay a 35% contingency fee; therefore, 35% is tacked on to whatever they owe the City. Mr. Hudson advised that SIMM Associates, Inc., would have a 20% fee. For example, if a customer owed the City $100, the total fee would be $120, with the City receiving $100 and SIMM Associates keeping $20. SIMM Associates would not be paid unless they collect, and if they collect they would add their 20% and the service would be free to the City. Mr. Hudson stated that staff recommended authorization to negotiate and sign a final, three (3) year agreement with SIMM Associates, Inc. He noted that this would remove First Credit.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 17 Mr. Shevock recused himself from voting on this matter for personal reasons. Members were provided a Trial Balance Report prepared May 31, 2016 (Attachment #3). Mr. Hudson noted that Line 21 reflected balances over 30, 60 and 90 days for residential energy. He advised that this was highlighted to indicate the amount of funds owed for electric bills; however, a new collection agency would pursue all amounts listed in the report. In response to Mr. Hare, Mr. Hudson indicated that SIMM Associates, Inc. would also be collecting delinquent tax bills. Mr. Sudler moved to recommend authorizing staff to negotiate and sign a final three (3) year agreement with SIMM Associates, Inc. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hutchison and unanimously carried, with Mr. Shevock abstaining. Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Maintenance and Repair Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that proposals were solicited and advertised according to City policy by the City’s Contract and Procurement Manager under RFP #16-0040PW for Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Maintenance and Repair. Submissions were received from four (4) contractors. One (1) was deemed non-responsive and the other three (3) were evaluated by cost and performance. Based on that evaluation, staff recommended awarding a contract to A. A. Duckett, Inc., which would include four (4) quarterly preventative maintenance services, as well annual preventative maintenance services for each of the units. Mr. Koenig stated that standby and emergency rates were also incorporated into the proposal. Staff recommended awarding a three (3) year contract with the option for two (2) one (1) year extensions to A.A. Duckett, Inc. as per the proposal submitted in response to RFP #16-0040PW. Mr. Hare noted that the rates between John Hiott Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Inc., and A. A. Duckett, Inc. were very close. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that there was a slight difference in the tech rate; however, the after hours and general labor rates were very similar. Mr. Hare questioned why a company from New Jersey was selected rather than a company from Wyoming, Delaware. Responding, Mr. Koenig explained that staff was interested in overall performance and liked the discussion about safety records that A. A. Duckett provided, noting that HVAC services had been a challenge for staff. He stated that staff preferred this company because they have a good performance record in the documentation submitted. Mr. Hare asked if A. A. Duckett had a facility in Delaware, and Mr. Koenig responded that they did not and were being dispatched out of New Jersey; however, he was unsure where their staff actually lives and if they take their trucks home at night. He advised that they had stated they could meet the City’s standards to be here in the time frames identified in the RFP, and if they do not they would be called out on non-performance, as stated in the contract. Mr. Neil moved to recommend awarding a three (3) year contract with the option for two (2) one (1) year extensions to A.A. Duckett, Inc. as per the proposal submitted in response to RFP #16-0040PW, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sudler and carried with Mr. Anderson voting no.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 18 Recommendation of General Employee Pension Board - Consideration of a Retiree Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) Mr. Lester Blakeman, 209 Falmouth Way, advised members that he is a member of the Civilian Pension Board and a pensioner. Members were provided handouts by Mr. Blakeman, as follows: 1) Exhibit A - COLA History, and 2) Exhibit B1 - Breakdown of Monthly Pension Payments and B2 - Pension List 2008 (Attachment #4). Mr. Blakeman stated that the COLA History listed the cost of living increases that had been granted to retirees in the General Employee Pension Plan. He informed members that it had been 10 years since a COLA had been addressed, which he felt was a long time. Mr. Blakeman understood that there was nothing in the pension plan that guarantees a cost of living increase for these pensioners, and these employees knew this when they retired; however, he noted that in the past the City had acknowledged from time to time that retirees may need a little help surviving. He explained that Exhibit B1 listed pension checks written through January 15, 2008, when this matter was last reviewed. He noted that the individuals in the first column were making less than $1,000 per month. Mr. Blakeman stated that more than half the individuals in the second column were making less than $2,000 per month and the primary amount in the third column was approximately $2,000. He felt that the last three (3) individuals were doing okay. Mr. Blakeman indicated that he had previously suggested granting raises to sections of the pensioners and was told that this would not be allowed and an increase of any kind must be applied to all pensioners. He explained that he would be glad not to receive an increase if some of those on the lower end of the scale could be helped. Reiterating that a COLA had not been discussed for 10 years, Mr. Blakeman stated that this used to be an annual discussion. He requested that reviewing the need for or the ability to provide a COLA for pensioners in the General Employee Pension Plan be included on a future agenda. Mr. Blakeman advised that these were the people who built the City and gave hundreds or thousands of years of combined service to the City, and he felt it might be appropriate to give them some help from time to time. He stated that if this goes unnoticed year after year, nothing would happen and suggested it could be agreed to at least review this every year as part of the budget process. Mr. Blakeman indicated that he did not expect anything to happen this year, stating his understanding that the budget was set. He stated that if pension payments were $3,863,000, a 1% increase would cost $38,000, a 2% increase would cost $77,000, a 3% increase would cost $115,000, a 4% increase would cost $154,000, and a 5% increase would cost $193,000. Mr. Slavin questioned if Mr. Blakeman’s figures were calculated on a one (1) time annual basis. Responding, Mr. Blakeman stated that the figures that he provided were the cost for the year of the increase and would be the carry-forward amount until additional action was taken. He noted that the history provided showed that a variety of approaches had been taken in regard to increases. Mr. Blakeman thanked Mr. Anderson and others for getting him to the point to talk to members today, stating that this had been a long, uphill battle. In response to Mr. Neil, Mr. Blakeman stated that pensioners were also collecting Social Security. Mr. Blakeman stated that employees were told when they signed up for the plan that they should not count on the City’s contribution as their sole source of retirement income and the plan would be in conjunction with Social Security. He estimated Social Security payment at approximately one-third of the amount that employees receive from their City pension, noting that COLAs from Social Security had been scarce.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 19 Mr. Neil stated that he would favor considering this in the future. Mr. Blakeman indicated that this was all he was asking, noting that pensioners feel like lost sheep because they are not being talked about but are set aside and ignored. He reiterated the desire to at least be considered. Mr. Shevock questioned the amounts that employees were making per month, for example, the individual who was receiving $200 per month and $2,400 per year. Responding, Mr. Blakeman indicated that $200 was probably a minimum pension amount. He stated that this employee could have been making $4,000 per year or less. Mr. Blakeman advised that the City’s defined benefit plan allowed employees to set their own pensions. He indicated that employees received 2% for every year they worked and the amount was based on their average salary during their last three (3) years. An employee who worked 10 years would receive 20% of their salary, an employee who worked 20 years would receive 40%, and an employee who worked 50 years would receive 100% of their salary. Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 Amending Chapter 22 - Building and Building Regulations; Chapter 26 - Businesses; Chapter 50 - Floods; Chapter 66 - Manufactured Homes and Trailers; Chapter 102 - Taxation; Chapter 106 - Traffic and Vehicles; Chapter 110 - Utilities; Appendix B - Zoning, Articles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 12; and Appendix F- Fees and Fines (Sponsors: Neil, Slavin, and Cole) Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, informed members that Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 had required a very comprehensive review and update to the Dover Code including any section referencing manufactured homes or mobile homes. She explained that the Mobile Home Park Zone would by changed to the Manufactured Home Zone, and it was made clear that manufactured homes that meet that Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) standard are the type of homes that are allowed. Mrs. Townshend stated that this would ensure that nothing that does not meet those standards would be permitted in the City; however, language would be left to ensure that homes that already exist could still obtain licenses. In addition, where the current Code references mobile home parks, the terminology had been changed to land lease communities, and basic standards for maintenance and licensing of land lease communities had been developed. Mrs. Townshend explained that much of the language involved the zoning section of the Code, as well as the licensing section for manufactured homes. She noted that staff did a sweep of the entire Code and reviewed any section that referenced the terms manufactured home, mobile home, or trailer to make sure the text was consistent with current terminology. Councilman Neil read a prepared statement, as follows: Monday night, we heard Chief Carey mention the fire at the Grandview mobile home community that damaged or destroyed 3 houses. Several years ago before I was elected to this august body, Councilman Hare, then Councilman Perza and I toured several leased land communities, one of those was Grandview... which isn't grand at all. The potholes, contrary to State Law and the City code, were deep enough to serve as swimming pools for kids. I have sent each of you copies of the arbitrators decision in the Wild Meadows case in which the arbitrator said . . . “In all, I am left asking myself: If the City of Dover

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2016 PAGE 20 had not issued the Violation Letter, would the Landlord have ever fixed the community’s problems? The record before me indicates No . . . .” Wild Meadows is located on wetlands, the community owner was required to sign a topography map. Deep fissures or sinkholes were clustered around failing drains. Streets the City would build to last for 20 to 30 years, are going bad after 12. Today, I sent to you the Saga of the Gas Cut-off. The problem is, for the same services we provide, the values of homes drop, and we collect less tax money. The State of Delaware has laws that it can’t or does not enforce. The low income and limited income home owners are held at the mercy of the landlord because Leased Land communities are not “Free Enterprise” businesses. In the past, the Wild Meadows Home Owners Association had to request the City to make management cut down a tree branch that blocked a stop sign. While this ordinance can’t cure all of the ills in the leased land arena, this will mark the first in the State to hold community owners accountable for health and safety violations of the law, or face the loss of their license to operate. Mr. Neil moved to recommend adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2016-16, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and unanimously carried. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cole and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Mr. Sudler moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:56 p.m. Timothy A. Slavin Council President TAS/TM/js/dd S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Committee-Minutes\2016\06-14-2016 CCW.wpd Attachments Attachment #1 - Correspondence from Mr. Michael Maupin, MauTiste Investment Group, dated June 9, 2016 - Extension of offer to Purchase 29 South Governors Avenue and 749 West North Street Attachment #2 - Information provided by Mr. Kirby Hudson, Assistant City Manager, regarding “City of Dover Collection Agency Services Contract, RFP Number 16-0033CM” Attachment #3 - Trial Balance Report prepared May 31, 2016 Attachment #4 - Documents provided by Mr. Lester Blakeman - Exhibit A - COLA History, Exhibit B1 - Breakdown of Monthly Pension Payments, and Exhibit B2 - Pension List 2008

ATTACHMENT #1 Council Committee of the Whole Meeting of 06/14/2016 June 9, 2016 City of Dover Division of Purchasing 710 William Street Dover, DE 19904 Attention Procurement Manager: MauTiste Investment Group (MIG) is prepared to extend the expiration date of our offer to purchase the parcels listed in the enclosed letter to the City of Dover dated April 12, 2016. After a better understanding of the approval process, we are pleased to allow the City of Dover the necessary time to fully consider the benefits of MIG developing 3 additional homes for sale in the city this year. The expiration date of our offer is extended to July 15, 2016. Sincerely, Michael Maupin Michael Maupin Managing Director MauTiste Investment Group 644 Merchant Street • Coatesville, PA 19320 • (610) 363-6900

April 12, 2016 City of Dover Division of Purchasing 710 William Street Dover, DE 19904 Attention Procurement Manager: MauTiste Investment Group, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and NCALL Loan Fund, Inc., a Delaware Non-Profit Community Development Financial Institution, are working together to development home ownership opportunities in Dover. MauTiste is offering to purchase and develop two parcels (Listed Below) owned by the City of Dover. NCALL Loan Fund Inc. will be our funding partner. It is our plan to acquire and immediately develop these parcels for sale. The terms and conditions for the sale of these parcels are specified in the City of Dover’s RFP dated August 1, 2015. MauTiste is prepared to enter into an agreement of sale within two weeks after our offer is accepted. Offer Sheet No. 16-0008CM; 29 South Governors Avenue $8,000 No. 16-0004CM; 749 West North Street $18,000 Total Offer- $26,000 This offer will expire in 15 days or on April 29, 2016. Sincerely, Michael Maupin Managing Director MauTiste Investment Group 644 Merchant Street • Coatesville, PA 19320 • (610) 363-6900

ATTACHMENT #2 Council Committee of the Whole Meeting of 06/14/2016 City of Dover Collection Agency Servkes Contract RFP Number 16-003 3CM

Collection Agency Services ·c ontract RFP Number 16-0033CM Decision Scale .. - . - '· ' ; Can accept . 0 Delaware Minority Do they CSVand - location business Are they currently excel ftles . Number of preference preference licensed to have clients and offers Wiiiing to What is the - Years in as specified as specified collect in all in client offer Fee is contingency location Business in RFP. in the RFP. 50 states? Delaware? portals. Training? negotiable rate? Elimlnatgd? Rank ' SI MM Associates, Inc. Delaware 24 x x x x x x 20% 1 NRA Group, LLC Pennsylvania 30 x x x x x 24% x Penn Credit Corporation Pennsylvania 27 x x x x x 20.5% 2 Progressive Financial Pennsylvania 30 x x x x 23% 3 Creditech, Inc . Pennsylvania 80 x x 18% )( The Affiliated Group, Inc. Minnesota 90 x x x 19% x Contract Callers, Inc. Pennsylvania 89 x 24% )( Municipal Services Bureau Texa s 24 x 25% )( """ All companies listed offer services similar in nature and are comparable in terms of auto dialer and timed calls, paper correspondence, consumer dispute resolution, credit bureau reporting, office hours, and client location services. Each company has provided a Collectors Code of Ethics and regulatory requirements for Federal, State, and Local Guidelines; to include FDCPA and FCRA.

ATTACHMENT #3 Council Committee of the Whole liRF.F.ARED ~/31/l6, 22:10:32 Vii.OGRA.'1 UT·l2~L TR IAI. BALANCE PAGE 116B Meeting of 06/14/2016 C!TY OF DOVER CURRENT OVER 30 OVER 60 OVER 9C RCV CODE DESCRIPTION TOTAL • FINAL TOTALS • IM CTY SEWER IMPACT FEE .oo . 00 .c o 13,672 . 50 13,~n.s o W'J TR EL W/O TO ACT ACC .00 .oo .00 34 . 20 34. 20 Cl WATER SERVICE 230,558 . 95 23,415. 99 3,821.24 34,547 . 14 292,343.31 ~ 2 WASTEWATER SERVICE 133,722.32 13, 0 80 . 66 3,557.53 28,848 . 45 179,208. 96 03 KENT CTY SEWER ADJ 1 0 2,883.06 1 0,331.78 2,908 . 35 ~4.037 . 69 140,1 6 0.68 04 GROUNDWATER ADJ 65,872.79 ~.835.40 l. 931.71 10, 169 . 10 84,809.00 13 MISC' \oiATER/SEWER 100 . 00 100.00 .00 235 . 00 435.00 i.; SEWER PENALTY 280. 28 249.82 115. 92 989 . 35 1 , 6 35 . 37 15 KCSA PENALTY 2:2 . 1e 204. 3 4 108.3~ 97 6 . 57 1. 502. 06 17 BULK TRASH 275.00 . 00 .00 25 . 00 300.00 18 RESIDENTIAL TRASH 78,053.99 6,244.23 699.62 H,682 . 29 101.680.13 19 CO~:MERCIAL TRASH 13,930 . 46 l.149.09 34.00 579 . 17 15,692.72 I 14, 7 6-2 . 50 I 1.556,66.2.13 ---121 RESIDENTIAL ENERGY 8!>-9 , lO'J . : S lO:J , 2.\1 . S fn 519 , SS-4 . 92 22 COMM UTIL TAX 2. 00\ 141.02 .00 . 00 9 . 38 150.40 24 COMM UTIL TAX 4.25\ 24,080.04 1,299.17 74. 47 3,113.46 20,567.14 26 COMM OUTDOOR LGHTNG 27,847.70 845.28 .oo 782. 02 29,475.00 28 RES OUTDOOR LGHTNG 3,055 . 14 242.31 62.70 919.97 4,280 . 12 31 COMMERCIAL ENERGY 824,755.99 46,016.73 L 015.20 86,452 . 59 960,300.51 32 PRI~.ARY ENERGY 1,061,659.72 28,8 2 1.15 2,007.42 46' 920. 91 1,139,409.20 36 PRI~J.RY ENERGY ADJ . oo .OD .00 7,293.11 7,291.ll 19 MISC ELECTRIC REV 15 , 549.72 116.17 4 . 16 4,12 6 .96 19,7 97.0 l 40 OOVER AFB 325,527 . 93 97 , 072 . 27 .0 0 . 00 422,600 . 20 42 KRAFT 261,221.30 .00 . 00 . 00 261.221.30 44 PROCTER & GAMB!,E 81,562.50 .00 .00 . 00 81. 562. 50 46 PRIMARY UT TAX 2. 00\ 6,031.02 176 . 50 2 17.62 1,832 . 89 8,258.03 47 PRl~.AR Y UT TAX 4.25\ 19,193 . 32 .00 . 00 .00 19, 193.32 48 TRANS UT TAX 2.00\ 7,624.lC 4,484 . 33 .00 .00 12.108.43 SO ELECTRIC PENALTY 3,324 . 51 2, 151.48 3 23. 16 18,961.66 24,760.81 51 WATER PENALTY 313.88 287 . 60 1 09.83 1,211 . 93 1,923.24 52 ELECT RET CHECK FEE 1.237.40 576 . 63 80 . 00 4. 061. 55 5,955 . 58 53 ELECTRIC SERVICE CHG 1,307 . 51 4,198.14 604.52 22,474 . 23 34,584.46 60 BILLED DEPOSIT 9,661.14 1,642.77 6.52 . oo 11,310.43 70 FIRST STATE POWER 31,660.95 .00 .oo .oo 31,660.95 12 ~~ITE OAK SOLAR 6 , 862.89 .00 .00 .00 &,862.89 80 INTERNET SERVICE . 00 .oo . 00 79 . 50 19 . 50 81 GRASS CUTTING .00 .00 .oo 90.00 90.00 85 POLICE FINES 2,800.00 .00 .00 . 00 2,800.00 91 CURBSIDE RECYCLE 30.00 .00 . 00 .00 30.00 96 GREEN ENERGY ADJ 6,Ql,7 . 18 1,141.29 56 . 10 1,04.8 . 90 8,894.61 • TOTAL 4,252,408.40 354,524.68 34 . 561. 56 869,730 . 44 5,511, 305.08 LESS CREDIT BALANCES 393,237.1 3 · NET TOTI\!, 5,118,067.95 • FINAL STATUS TOTALS • DEBIT CREDIT NET TOTAL ACCOUNTS STATUS BALANCES I ACCOUNTS BALANCES I ACCOUNTS BALANCES I AC COUNT~ WITH 0 BALANCES A ACTIVE 4,599,133.81 12,890 228,328 . 22- l, 449 4, 370,805.59 24,336 9,997

PREPARED 5/31/H , :1.2:10:32 TRlAL BALANCE PAGE 11650 PROGRAM UT425L CIT Y OF OOVER CURi<ENT OVE:R 30 OVER 60 ()VER 90 RCV CODE DESCRIPTION TOTA!. • FINl\.L STATUS TOTALS • DSBIT CREDIT NET TOTAL ACCOUNTS STATUS BALJillCES / ACCOUNTS BALANCES I ACCOUNTS BA.LANCES / ACCOUNTS WITH 0 BA!..ANCES C COLLECTION 822.996.96 2,6?6 13. 104. 18 . 31 809,892.78 ),589 882 F FINALLED "14,533.74 521 151.232.70- 625 76,698.96 · 99 . 943 98,797 INACTIVE .00 0 . 00 0 .00 e B N TERMINATED. NONPAY .00 0 . 00 0 .oo l"I 17 T TERMINATED 14,6.l0.77 104 572.03· 11 14,058.?•I 213 98 W \t.~ITE OFF 9. 80 l . 00 0 9.80 1,582 3,581 TOTALS 5,511, 305.08 16. 192 39) ,237.13 - 21116 5, 118. 067. 95 131, 688 113,380

ATTACHMENT #4 Council Committee of the Whole A COLA History Meeting of 06/14/2016 January 1, 1983 less than 3 years Oo/o 3 to 15 years 5.7 1Yo more than J 5 years l 0.5<.~) Julyl , 1986 al I retirees 2% July 1, 1988 all retirees prior to 6/30/88 501o July 1, 1989 a11 retirees prior to 6130189 2% '1993 $60/year - max $600 0%; based on years of service July I, 1996 years of servke & pension amount - mini_mum $100 July I, 2000 all retiree.s $20 per month - increase minimum monthly amount to $200 July 1, 2002 all retirees prior to 2o/o December 31, 2000 July 1,2003 all retirees 1.5(Yo July I, 2005 all retirees prior to 2% Decem bcr 3 1, 2004 J unc 26, 2006 all retirees prior to 1% January l, 2006 July 2007 None - $75,00 set aside for July 2008 This document was provided by Mr. Lester Blakeman, and the information included has not been verified by City staff.

Sheett l!lt<tAl<OOWN OF MONTHLY~ PAYMENTS ' Retil9e PilWment a of Jaf\ld!Y 15, 2DllB) ' ,.,.,., < l }CMlian Pension Plan I l i I I t} I i' ! 1 I BJ Month ~ ! Year l I ' Month $1,uuu $1,999 Year I $2,uw S2.B99I Monlh I I Year I i $3,000! $3,999 Month ! Year l I i ~.OOOJ $4,W9i Month Year ! 1 $200.00: $2.400.00\ l 51,002.061 $12,024.72 ! . $2, !8t.21. $26,174.;:i<! ' l . $3,000.76! :f.37.0$.::?5 I $4,212.g;j $50,544.52l ~ $217.59 $2,SU .CSj i $1,0'".6.20 :i1,026.4ll $12,~..:.40; I $2.1~1 ! '5"Lti.1$.52 I I ! 1 I 1 $4,55·1.81 $54,~44) I 3j $217.59 SZ,6i1.08. ! $12,317.1\>l l ~2, fl.!.:i-21 $".t.S,198.;u ! : ! 4i $217.51: $2,811.08) 31,001.oo $12,C18.IA'l 82.184.21 $26,210.52 f t $217.59 $217.61: $2,611.08· $2,611.06 $1,~.:'>ll I $1,l.IDl).61 $12,666.96 $12,799.32 $2.186.21 $2,186.21 $26,~.:>• :lidJ,234.::.;. ' 1 ! 7. $217.59 $2,611.08 $1,073.00 $12,876.00 $2.187.21 $26,246.52 .. 8 $223.84 $2,686.vc $1,111.05 $13,332.60 $2,188.21 $26,258.52 i 9 $225.91 $2,710.921 l $1,121.94 :i>13,463..:<:i $2,189.21 $26,270.52 I 1( 'SL4l:37 $2.716.441 I $1,13.0.tili.I,_ $13,567.'1.J $2.~ ! j I ! 11 $270.11 $3.241.32 l $1,132.W $13,586.U!! $2..1912t $26,294.~ 12 $272.45 $3,269.~ $1,142.l>'l $13,710.481 $2,192.21 $26,306.52 i 1~ $276.21 $3,314.o;.! $1,149.11 $13,789.3:2 $2,193.21 $26,318.:i• l ! 14 $293.Uli $3,516.r. $1,153.~~ $13,843.44 $2,194.21 $26,~.52 l tfi $314.79 $3,m.41: $1,162.;r.< $13,947.~ S2.195.21 $26,342.52 1e $321.01 $3,852.1~ $1,166.43 $13,997.16 $2,19621 $26,354.5:< ! 17 $328.71 $3,944.52 $1,172.1~ $14,066.16 $2,197.21 $26,366.52 I 1f ~..:.04 $3,984.48 $1,198.llll $14,385.llC $2,19821 ! 191 f.347.61 ~,113.74 ~ ~ ~ $1,221.72.· ~~~.oov.~ &1!i'il21 I l 20 $358.1~ S4,417.68i I I ~.:.!lltl.52 $15,201.Sti ~.21 $26,402.52 i :n >l>~D.'dl: $4,427.88! ~1,272.3S $1~•.<me.fill $2,20121' ua,414.52 l ! z; $396.5C $4,758.lllli l $LMt.4': $i!l·~.!Ill $2,20'2.21 OMV,426.:>2 l z,l $416.rll $5,001.12 l S1.299.32 $1: ,591.64 $2,20'3.21 .'>Lt!,438.52 I 2~ $426.75 $5,121.00! $1,331.G"J $1E ,979.4'1 $2,204.21 $26,450.:>2 ' 25 $426.0or $5,136.00 $1,~.7~ $16,197.00 $2,205.;<1 :liZ!i,462.5:; I ' ;a: $428.13] $5,137.~ i $1,.,.,,,.CJ\ $16,389.60 $2.;.:w.<tl $26,474.52 I 2i ~.481 $5,141.76 S1,;:soo.~ $16,4...'?6.5ll $2.207.21 $26,486.52 l $448.W $5,31t!.2'l $1,'1/iHli $16,:>«>.~ $2,D.21 :a.as,498.02 I ""2!i $459."l'l $6,513~ $1,379.U' $16,548.48 $2,209.21 $26,510.52 ;11, $481.35 $5,776.21.l $1,3862: $16,635.00 $2,210.21 $26,522.5< 31 $506.4li $6,0n.41l $1,'"'1.DC $17,324.1e $2,211.21 ~.534.5< 31 $508.01 $6,096.12 $1,«i;1.M $17,566.68 $2,Zl2.21 $26.~.52 3:1 $510.16 $6, 121.i.r.: $1,475.°" $17,707.21: $2.213.21 $26,568.52 .J'I '513.4l $6,161.76 $1,4715.7! $17,721.48 ~ $518.& $6,225.ou $1,'lltt.18 $17,966.16 ~ $549.ll1l $6,598.21: $1,51428 $18,171.Jli :fl $574.~ $6,892.ot $1,553.Uli $18,636.0C ! JI $586./lj $7,041.48 $1,560.UL $18,720.00 31 :llOtll:I.~ $7,075.uc $1,562.2~ $18,746.88 I 40 $590.tK $7,087.t.14. $1,576.10 $18,913.21: . 41 ~.79 $7,137.41l $1,fil9.57 $18,954.8'1 42 $600.!1' $7,207~ $1,mB.91 $19.241i.Y'.i ~ $608.99 $7,307.88 $1,&45.a<! $19,747.68 , 4'I 411 41 $518.73 $843.~ ~.08 $7,424.76 $7,719.ut ~,LLU.J!K ! ,1,filj!j.7~ $1,657x:. $1,675.09 $19,880.88 $19,&l::l.16 $20,101.08 . 41 uoo.19 li8,"l!tll.n I $1,rw.89 $20,410.58 41! $715.oe lllJ,:5111.LH &1.~1 ..... $20,779..4< 4ll ~r1S.66 !'8.=.:>.94 $1,r;xi.H $20,834.~ 5(J $1ZT.OB $8,724.tA: ~1.1;,. .11 'll.ol:l,026.04 51 $739.01 $8,868.1. $1,101 .a~ $21,440.28 52 :;;: f739.48 $743.81 $8,<:11.:>.n: $8,925.r. ~n.1111 .u;: $1.lf.ll LU: $21,792.38 ~ 948.t>1J I I Sil >t:>1.6'1 $9,019.oc ~1.-.0• $22,188.24 :x:i ::It ~.Zll .111.U!:I $9,039.1~ $9,253.0f $1 ,860.:>oi $1,o=O<! ;i;:.u,326.48 $22,380.2<1 I :Jj •111.70 $9,332.41: $1,873.:.tJ =..:,478.7ll "" :JI: il79.58 $1~.sa $9,354.96 $9,431.76 $1,fJ77.0". $1,881.2<1 $22,534.08 :i;;a,574.l!ll I $797.SS $9,571.vc $1,894.79 $22,737.48 I OU 61 $800.70 $9,608.4l $1,903.91 :s.z.1,846.92 $824.51 $9,894.12 $1,957.26 $23,487.1. "' _,_.,. i10,1:>S.;io: $10,08&.1tl I tlll H<I $846.u;: v.:: ~-4(l $10,384.& ! I 6i :lill~Ul~ $10,431 .m 67 """"'.37 $10,624.4' GI $887.54 $10.650.4B I 81 ~.48 $10,709.71! 7~ $911.Se $10,942.3<! 71 $917.25 $11,wt.OO j l ,. $979.1S $11,750.:.al I ,,,t) $979.!5!1 $11,754.81:1 j l r" I I . .l - .. 7, $999.80 $11,997.0J ·-. I l -· - . - (j 'f/]t q· I~ 3&16 'ft I r;: \~' / This document was provided by 7I '1l j/ < .di Mr. Lester Blakeman, and the I 'JG information included has not been verified by City staff.

Bl -- Sheel2 Pension list 2008 - - - - "- · Monthly Annual Retired on ~- Payment Payment 07/14115 -- .. $425.13 $5,101 .56 11/11/12 $669.29 $8,031.48 06/20/14 - ·- - - - $683.46 $8,201.52 08/31/11 $742.61 $8,911.32 04/01/13 $822.0b $9,864.00 02118112 $823.37 $9,880.44 05./30/12 $897.16 $10,765.92 -· 05/11/13 $901.52 $10,818.2~ - '-1 01/03/08 $979.19 $11,750.28 Ul1119/Ul:J $1,188.40 $14,260.lSll - ·---- 11/01/09 $1,198.10 $14 ,377.20 05/28/10 $1,282.48 $15,389.76 05/11/13 $1,337.07 $16,044.84 07I08/09 $1,383.40 $16,600.00 05/18/13 $1,462.71 $17,552.52 09/29/12 ----- · - · $1,508.12 $18,097.44 ' 11/21/09 $1,608.06 $19,296.72 05/25/13 $1 ,616.89 $19,402.68 10/06/14 $1,714.28 $20,571 .36• 01/03/12 $1,755.85 $21,070.201 00..'30/12 - - ·- $1,778.09 $21 ,337.08 01/28/10 $1,781.691 $21 380.281 06/24/11 $1,837.87 $22,054.~ -- 05122112 $1,846.84 $22,162.08 -· - · r - -- 06125/10 .. $1,854.47 .$22,253.64 05/30/12 $1,866.15 $22,393.80 - 11/17/12 $1,886.44 $22,637.28, -· 0112811 2 $1,91 7.31 $23,007.72 08/01/09 $1,937.52 $23,250.2~1 10/11/09 $1,974.60 $23,695.20 02101/08 $1 ,978.44 $23,741.28 ) $} 05/31/13 $1,998.78! $23 985.36 ~ 03/29/08 $2,018.84 $24 ,226.08 01/19/13 $2,032.43 $24,389.16 08106/09 $2,046.681 $24,560_16 05/25/13 $2,095.60 $25,147.20 01/02110 - $2,107.25 $25,287.00 08/29/09 $2,205.80 $26,469.60 09/26/09 $2,209.90 $26,518.80 ,..__. 05/02110 $2,237.47 $26,849.64 I 06127/15 $2,244.68 $26,936.161 l 04/01/10 $2,244.75 $26,937ID 03127110 $2,287.~ $27,447.48 07/04/14 $2,348.55 $28,182.60 11/18/10 $2,417.42 $29,009.04 -- 05/17/15 $2,468.14 $29,617.68 02/23/13 $2,534.94 $30,419.28 04/06112 $2,626.91 $31,522.92' I I 01/07/12 $2840.34 $34,084:08 06/16/12 __.. - .,..... $3,192.05 $38.._~24-~ 11/16/15 $3 ~277.12 $39,32~:..~ 11/06/14 $3,388.56 $40,662.72 01/09/11 $3,578.61 $42,943.32 r. 02/14/13 $3 962.46 $47 549.5~ 01/04/14 $4,297.92 $51 ,575.04 ,, !fl ..J.... 06/10/11 $5,:l93.20 $64,718.40 i. ,,..7...,,£.._ Page 1 This document was provided by Mr. Lester Blakeman, and the information included has not been verified by City staff.

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Safety Advisory & Transportation Committee DATE SUBMITTED: 6/20/16 PREPARED BY: Ann Marie Townshend on behalf of Councilman James Hosfelt SUBJECT: Abandonment of Topaz Circle Stub Street REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: The Arbors Senior Apartments REVIEWED BY: N/A EXHIBITS: Map Exhibit MI-16-06, Chronology of Development Activity for 1051 College Road, Abandonment of Streets or Alleys – Improved – Policy for City Clerk’s Office EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: N/A AMOUNT BUDGETED: N/A FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): N/A TIMETABLE: Referral to Development Advisory Committee and Planning Commission (July 18, 2016 meeting); Utility Committee for August 9, 2016 RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council needs to make a recommendation to: 1) waive the normal process for street abandonment, and 2) refer the matter to the Planning Commission for a public hearing on July 18, 2016. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Following the Planning Commission’s approval of the Arbors Senior Garden Apartments (S-16-07) at 1051 College Road, members of City Council heard concerns from residents in Emerald Point regarding the interconnection between the Arbors and Emerald Point. Emerald Point was approved by the Planning Commission with two stub streets, one of which is at Topaz Circle and connects south to 1051 College Road (the Arbors). This stub street has been improved as part of the Emerald Point construction. At the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting of April 26, 2016, the Committee heard a presentation from the Planning Office about the history of the Arbors project and interconnection between the subject site and Emerald Point, followed by public testimony with regard to the interconnection. The Committee unanimously approved a motion to “[look] into the process of abandoning the stub street that was recommended by the Planning Commission in Emerald Pointe.” This motion was ultimately approved by City Council through the acceptance of the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee minutes on May 9, 2016. The City’s charter provides City Council the power and authority to vacate or abandon streets (Article II, Section 27). The Dover Code of Ordinances does not specify a process for street abandonment, but the City has consistently followed a process specified by the City Clerk’s Office (attached). This process begins with a request from an adjacent property owner. In this case, there is no such request; however, it is within the authority of City Council to initiate the process. Proposals for abandonment of improved streets are referred to the Development Advisory Committee and the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission makes a recommendation to the Utility Committee. The Utility Committee makes a recommendation to City Council, who sets a public hearing and takes action following the public hearing. This process would start with a motion by City Council to waive the normal process for street abandonment and to refer the matter to the Planning Commission.

City of Dover Application No.: MI-16-06 Department of Planning & Inspections RG-5 M CPO vd Bl e C on ol st M IO le in em er G To p al Ct ge az Pa Cir rk D r Sc ar bo ro ug R-8 hR d l Pl pa CPO O CPO RG-5 Site es tm ins W R-20 te r C t M Dr ite cK an ee nz Ta C-2A Rd IO Ct e in ar m ua Aq CPO t an te r C Ta m O Sh Pin RG-2 Rd O R-10 e R-10 ak le g IO D ol r C Re ROS Me dO R-10 rio ak R-10 n Rd Dr R-10 RG-3 eek Dr ROS Cr st For Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus e R-10 DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Title: Abandonment of Topaz Circle stub street Address: Emerald Pointe subdivision Zoning: R-8 (One Family Residence Zone) Legend Date: 5-19-16 Project Area Dover Parcels Zoning « 0 250 500 1,000 Feet Dover Boundary

Chronology of Development Activity for Property at 1051 College Road, Dover, DE Tax Parcel: ED-05-067.00-01-35.03-000 2002 Emerald Point Subdivision (SB-02-01F)  Development review for property to the north of property at 1051 College Road.  Residential Subdivision of 107 single family detached dwelling units. o Subdivision entrance from McKee Road leading to internal street network of two major streets with several other cul-de-sac streets and two streets showing interconnectivity to adjacent parcels. o During the land planning process for the residential subdivision of Emerald Pointe a ‘stub street’ from Topaz Circle was planned to provide for access to a then vacant tract of land on College Road and to provide the continuation of the traffic circulation network in the general area. Opal Place is also a ‘stub street’ to another adjacent vacant lot north of Hidden Oaks. o Utility network (water and sewer services) located within the right- of-way are stubbed to the property line.  July 3, 2002 Development Advisory Committee Review  August 19, 2002 Planning Commission Review of Conceptual Subdivision Plan and granted approval to concept plan and recommended approval of waiver to reduce paved street width from 38 feet to 32 feet in the subdivision.  September 9, 2002 Utility Committee Recommends approval of waiver to reduce the paved width of the streets from 38 feet to 32 feet with the right- of-way remaining at 60 feet. Accepted by City Council on September 23, 2002.  October 10, 2002 Development Advisory Committee Review  October 25, 2002 Planning Commission Review of Preliminary Subdivision Plan and grants conditional plan approval including waiver to reduce paved street width from 38 feet to 32 feet and noting that future interconnection from the subdivision to adjacent properties will be subject to review processes. o The subdivision streets of Topaz Avenue (Circle) and Opal Place are designed to provide the opportunity for interconnection to adjacent parcels should they be developed in the future. o DelDOT recommends relocation of the future connection that extends Topaz Avenue (Circle) to College Road since its it too close to the intersection of Saulsbury/McKee Road; the recommendation is to move the connection further west.  March 19, 2004 Final Plan Approval granted to Subdivision Final Record Plat by Planning Office. o Includes Entrance Plan approval by DelDOT on March 6, 2003. Commercial Entrance Permit issued October 6, 2003 for subdivision entrance to McKee Road  Construction of Emerald Point Phase 1 begins June 2004 and construction of Emerald Point Phase II begins February 2006. Chronology of Development Activity for Property at 1051 College Road Page 1 of 5

2004 Lands of Mary E. McKee: Minor Subdivision Plan (SB-04-06)  Application filed August 4, 2004: Property at 1021 W. State College Road (6.1163 acres) is proposed for subdivision into two parcels as Parcel A of 4.0345 acres and the residual of 2.0818 acres. Initial parcel identified as Tax Parcel Ed-05-067.00-01-35.00-000. (Parcel A becomes The Arbors site.) Property is zoned R-8. o The Property had filed applications in June 2004 for amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and seeking rezoning of the property to CPO. The requests were denied by the Planning Commission and then withdrawn by the applicant. (MI-04-07 and Z-04-07).  September 9, 2004 Development Advisory Committee Review. o City Public Works Office requested cross access easement language to allow access from College Road to the proposed stub of Topaz Circle in Emerald Point subdivision. o DelDOT requests 60 ft. cross access easement across property from property to the north (for continuation of street network from Emerald Point project). Specific location to be determined in the future.  September 20, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing and Review: Action to approve subdivision with condition. o Planning Commission required that the location and width of the perpetual cross access from the adjacent property on the north (Emerald Pointe Subdivision) across the subject property to College Road will be determined in conjunction with the Site Plan approval process for development of the subject property. o The adjacent property on the north (Emerald Point) includes a right-of-way for a public street which currently terminates at the adjoining property line.  October 29, 2004 Final Record Plan Approval granted to Subdivision Plan. Record Plan includes Note: “This plan hereby provides a 24 feet wide perpetual cross access easement from College Road to the proposed stub street of Topaz Circle to be construction in Emerald Point Subdivision. The exact location of the easement to be determined at the time of development of Parcel A.” 2005 College Road Garden Apartments: Planned Neighborhood Design - Senior Housing Option (C-05-01)  The project was reviewed under the provisions of the Planned Neighborhood Design – Senior Citizen Housing Option in order to construct 52 units in two apartment style buildings and with a garage building. Project included entrance to College Road and a connection of a drive aisle to Topaz Circle.  April 7, 2005 Development Advisory Committee Review  April 18, 2005 Planning Commission Public Hearing and Review: took action to table application seeking additional information on building details, project density, traffic circulation, and the recreation area. Chronology of Development Activity for Property at 1051 College Road Page 2 of 5

 April 21, 2005 Active Recreation Area Plan reviewed by PRCE.  May 6, 2005 Revised Plan submitted that revised unit count to 48 dwelling units, revised traffic circulation, etc.  May 16, 2005 Planning Commission Review: Action to grant approval with conditions  2005-2006 Review of several Check Prints as project moved toward Final Plan  May 15, 2006 Planning Commission grants a one-year extension of plan approval.  May 30, 2007 Plan expires; plan not finalized. 2007 The Arbors: Planned Neighborhood Design – Senior Housing Option (C-07-05)  The Conditional Use Site Plan project was reviewed under the provisions of the Planned Neighborhood Design – Senior Citizen Housing Option in order to construction an apartment style building of 48 units.  June 7, 2007 Development Advisory Committee Review  June 18, 2017 Planning Commission Public Hearing and Review: took action to table application seeking further discussions of the traffic distribution and circulation for the site and the potential extension of Topaz Circle to College Road as a public street.  August 9, 2007 Development Advisory Committee Review of Revised Plan  August 20, 2007 Planning Commission Public Hearing & Review: Action to grant approval with conditions and including recommendations of approval for street waivers on horizontal curve radius and reduction of street right-of- way from 60 feet to 46 feet for creation of public street.  September 9, 2007 Utility Committee Review of street waivers recommending approval to City Council.  August 18, 2008 Planning Commission grants a one-year extension of plan approval.  February 17, 2009 Planning Commission informational review of plan design revisions.  June 22, 2009 Record Plan approval granted.  June 26, 2009 Record Plan recorded to establish right-of-way of Senior Way as a public street that divided the parcel into two areas.  July 13, 2009 Final Plan Approval granted to Conditional Use Site Plan.  August 31, 2009 C-07-05 Plan approval expires as construction was not commenced. 2009 Record Plan for Senior Way  June 26, 2009 Record Plan recorded establishing the right-of-way for Senior Way as associated with C-07-05. Record Plan was completed and recorded to establish the street right-of-way (width of 46 feet) for Senior Way as a public street and divided the property into two areas. o The street known as Senior Way (the continuation of the Topaz Circle “Stub Street”) as a public street to interconnect with College Road. o In addition, the street interconnection provides a distinct second Chronology of Development Activity for Property at 1051 College Road Page 3 of 5

entrance to both The Arbors and to Emerald Pointe Subdivision as now required with the revised Land Subdivision Regulations pertaining to streets. o Record Plan establishing public street right-of-way remains in place; no requirement for plan expungement in Land Subdivision Regulations. 2009-2010 Rezoning of Lands of JNK, LLC at 1051 College Road: Rezoning to RG-2 (Z-09- 05)  Rezoning request (Z-09-05) for the property at 1051 College Road (Lands of JNK, LLC) from R-8 (One Family Residence Zone) to RG-2 (General Residence Zone). RG-2 allows multiple dwellings.  March 15, 2010 Planning Commission Public Hearing and Review: Recommends approval of rezoning to RG-2.  April 12, 2010 City Council approved the rezoning to RG-2. 2010 The Arbors Condominiums (C-10-02)  April 22, 2010 Application Filed: Conditional Use Site Development Plan C- 10-02 proposed The Arbors Condominiums as an apartment building with forty-eight (48) units. The proposed use is considered a multiple dwelling. o The Application proposed access to The Arbors from McKee Road only by traveling through Emerald Point via the Topaz Circle stub street to two entrance/exit points (no public street construction proposed). An emergency access only connection to College Road was proposed.  July 8, 2010 Development Advisory Committee Review o Planning Staff recommends redesign of the site layout to implement construction of Senior Way (the continuation of the Topaz Circle stub street) to interconnect with College Road and to also provide access from the street to The Arbors. Similar comments also provided by Public Works Office, Fire Marshal’s Office, and Dover/Kent County MPO.  July 12, 2010 Review of Active Recreation Area Plan by PRCE Committee  July 19, 2010 Planning Commission Public Hearing but postponed action on Application C-10-02 seeking additional information on unit types and streets/interconnectivity.  August 16, 2010 Planning Commission Review continued: granted approval of C-10-02 with conditions. o Condition of approval includes the requirement to construct a public street from College Road and connecting to Emerald Point at Topaz Circle. This public street is to be constructed in the existing right-of- way for Senior Way. Access to The Arbors would be from this new public street.  July 18, 2011 Planning Commission grants a one-year extension of plan approval.  August 20, 2012 Planning Commission grants a second one-year extension of plan approval.  August 31, 2013 Plan expired. Plan not finalized; no construction authorized. Chronology of Development Activity for Property at 1051 College Road Page 4 of 5

2016 The Arbors Senior Garden Apartments (S-16-07)  February 5, 2016 Application filed: Site Plan (S-16-07) to permit construction of a 48-unit senior garden apartment complex consists of a proposed three- story 55,350 S.F. residential building and associated site improvements. o Includes construction of an improved public street (Senior Way) on existing right-of-way connecting College Road and Topaz Circle. The parcel exists as two discontinuous areas on either side of the right-of- way. The entrance to The Arbors is from Senior Way. o The owner of record is Shree Ganesh LLC  March 2 and 6, 2016 Development Advisory Committee Meetings & Review  March 15, 2016 Review of Active Recreation Plan by PRCE-COW  March 21, 2016 Planning Commission Public Hearing and Review: Action to grant conditional approval of Site Plan S-16-07 Chronology of Development Activity for Property at 1051 College Road Page 5 of 5

ABANDONMENT OF STREETS OR ALLEYS - IMPROVED - Policy for City Clerk’s Office (Article II - Mayor and Council, Section 27 - Power of Council to layout, locate, abandon, etc., streets, sidewalks, etc of the Charter). The council shall have power and authority to lay out, locate, accept, and open new streets and to widen and to alter existing streets or parts thereof, and to vacate or abandon streets or parts thereof, whenever they shall deem it for the best interest of the city. Whenever, the land comprehended or included in any street, or part thereof, vacated or abandoned under this section is owned by the city, the council may, in their discretion, sell such land either at private or public sale and for such consideration as the council shall deem proper, and shall have the right and power to convey to the purchaser or purchasers thereof a good and sufficient title thereto. The word "street" shall be deemed and held to comprehend and include sidewalks, lanes and alleys. Request for Alley/Street Abandonment for Staff Development Advisory Committee (DAC):__________ Applicant Development Advisory Committee (DAC):__________ Planning Commission:__________ Utility:__________ Council:________ Council Public Hearing:__________ IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT OF A REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT DATE DONE OF STREETS OR ALLEYS 1. Requests for abandonment of a street/alley should be submitted in writing to the City Clerk’s Office. The Clerk’s Office will refer the request to the Planning Department for review by the DAC and consideration by the Planning Commission. It will then be referred to the Utility Committee, and, if recommended for approval, to City Council (initially to set a public hearing and subsequently to hold this hearing). Upon receipt of the request, send an email to the Tax Assessor verifying the property owner of record. (1 - Verification of Owner of Record). 2. After receiving confirmation from the Tax Assessor that the applicant is the property owner of record, Open S:\Abandonments (current year) folder and create a new subdirectory using the property address to name the subdirectory (e.g., 235 Bayard Avenue). Scan the request and all supporting documentation and save it in the newly created subdirectory as “Request for Abandonment.” 3. Prepare a file folder label (2 - File Folder Label) and affix to a letter-sized file folder. Place a paper copy of the request in file folder. Be sure to make a copy of all previous and subsequent related emails and correspondence for this file.

4. If the requestor has provided other contacts, create a contact list with contact information for the requestor and any additional contacts provided by the requestor (e.g., those who were copied on the original request) (3 - Contact List). Save in the property subdirectory. 5. Send an email, along with the request, to the Public Works Director (4 - Email to Public Works Director - Improved vs. Unimproved) to determine if the request for abandonment is for an improved or unimproved street or alley. If the alley is unimproved, print the procedure/checklist located at S:\CLERK”S OFFICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES\Abandonments\Unimproved and place it inside the file folder. If improved, print this procedure/checklist and place it inside the file folder. 6. Schedule consideration of the request according to the Schedule for Consideration of Requests for Abandonment of an Alley/Street (S:\CLERK’S OFFICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES\ABANDONMENTS) for the current year. Print a copy of the Schedule, highlight appropriate dates and place in file. Write the dates of the Staff DAC, Applicant DAC, Planning Commission, Utility, and both Council (Council Meeting and Public Hearing) meetings in pencil on the front of the file folder and on the first page of the Abandonment Checklist. 7. Send an email to the City Manager, City Clerk, Public Works Director, City Planner, and Assistant City Planner (5 - Email to City Manager - Meeting Dates) informing them of all meeting dates when the abandonment will be considered (Staff DAC, Applicant DAC, Planning Commission, Utility and two (2) City Council meetings). 8. Consult the City Clerk to ensure that the abandonment is listed on the appropriate Utility and Council agendas (two (2) Council agendas). Set ticklers to check draft agendas three (3) weeks prior to established meeting dates. 9. Send an email to the Public Works Director (6 - Email to Public Works Director - Request for Map and Adjacent Owners) to request a list of all affected City and County adjacent property owners and their addresses, as well as an aerial map of the alley proposed for abandonment. (The map should include street addresses and tax parcel ID numbers on each parcel and utilities, such as electric lines, sewer lines, and manholes. The entire alley/street requested for abandonment should be shown in red.). This information will be compiled and submitted to the Planning Commission for a report to the Utility Committee. Copy the City Manager and GIS Manager on the email. 10. Upon receipt of the list of adjacent property owners, create a data file in Wordperfect (7 - Adjacent Property Owners Data File). Save in property subdirectory. Be sure to include any additional contacts provided by the requestor (see contact list above including those who were copied on original request).

ABANDONMENT OF STREETS OR ALLEYS - IMPROVED - Policy for City Clerk’s Office Page 3 11. Send a letter to the property owner advising him/her of the procedure for abandonment and the dates of the Applicant DAC, Planning Commission, Utility, Council, and Council Public Hearing Meetings (8 - Applicant Meeting Notification). Schedule response deadline according to the Schedule for consideration of Requests for Abandonment of an Alley/Street. Enclose a copy of the map provided by GIS. Make sure copies are sent to all appropriate parties (paper for contact list and electronic for staff). Set a tickler in Outlook for the response deadline. 12. Send a similar letter to the adjacent property owners advising them of the request, the procedure for abandonment, and the dates of the Planning Commission, Utility, Council, and Council Public Hearing Meetings (9 - Adjacent Property Owners Notification). Request an email address from interested parties for future notifications. Schedule response deadline according to the Schedule for consideration of Requests for Abandonment of an Alley/Street. Enclose a copy of the map provided by GIS. Make sure copies are sent to all appropriate parties (paper for contact list and electronic for staff). Set a tickler in Outlook for the date responses are due. 13. Prepare a notice (10 - Ad - Planning Commission Public Hearing) of the Planning Commission Public Hearing (to be published in a local newspaper (not officially required) at least 15 days prior to the date of the Public Hearing. If submitting the ad to the Delaware State News, the ad should be sent via email to legalads@newszap.com in Word format. Print the email with the attachments (ad) for file. 14. Set a tickler to verify that the ad was placed in the Delaware State News on the requested date. Be sure to make a copy of the ad in the newspaper for the file. 15. Review responses from adjacent property owners to determine which property owners are interested. Send an email to the Public Works Director and GIS Manager (11 - Email to Public Works Director - Request for CAF and Map) listing the participating owners and properties and requesting a legal description, Committee Action Form (CAF) and an aerial map of the areas of the alley proposed for abandonment for the Utility Committee Meeting. Copy Jason Lyon, Public Works Department, on the email. (The Committee Action Form should indicate whether a utility easement would be required and include a recommendation that Council adopt a resolution setting a Public Hearing regarding the abandonment. The map should include street addresses and tax parcel ID’s on each parcel and utilities, such as electric lines, sewer and storm sewer lines, and manholes. The portions of the alley/street requested for abandonment should be shown in red.) 13. Open the Adjacent Owners Data File that was created previously. Save as Participating Property Owners Data File. Delete names of property owners who did not elect to participate and resave. 14. Once the Utility Agenda has been finalized, print a copy and highlight the abandonment. Print relevant material from the Utility packet (CAF and aerial map from Public Works as well as Petition to Abandon and supporting DAC reports) and place it in the file as well.

ABANDONMENT OF STREETS OR ALLEYS - IMPROVED - Policy for City Clerk’s Office Page 4 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF_______________ 1. If the Utility Committee recommends abandonment, ensure that the abandonment is listed on the appropriate Council agenda for consideration of a resolution to set a public hearing regarding the abandonment. 2. A resolution will be prepared for Council to set the date of the public hearing at the upcoming Council Meeting. The legal description provided by the Public Works Department will be used for the resolution. Open S:\RESOLUTIONS- PROCLAMATIONS-TRIBUTES\Resolution Listing (Current Year) to determine the number for the resolution. Add the resolution to the Resolution Listing. 3. Prepare the resolution to set the date of the public hearing (12 - Resolution Setting the Public Hearing). The description provided by Public Works should be incorporated into the resolution and the resolution should be saved in S:\RESOLUTIONS-PROCLAMATAIONS-TRIBUTES\Year\DRAFT(Example: Resolution No. 2014-01 - Setting Public Hearing - Street Abandonment - Budd Street). Publish to PDF and save a copy in PDF format in the property subdirectory. 4. Place one (1) copy of the resolution in the abandonment file folder. The resolution and map will be an attachment to the Utility Committee Meeting Minutes to be presented to Council for adoption during their meeting of ____________. The following note will be included in the Utility Committee Meeting Minutes following the motion to recommend approval: [City Clerk’s Office Note: In accordance with the City’s Procedure for Alley Abandonments, Resolution No. 20**-** setting a Public Hearing (Attachment #*) will be presented to Council for consideration.] (If adopted, the resolution will be incorporated into the Council minutes.) 5. Post the resolution to the City of Dover website as a “Pending” resolution and update the status of the resolution on the resolution listing. 6. Prepare a “clean” copy of the resolution by removing line numbers, “draft” watermark, and “ proposed” from the resolution title, page header (if more than one page), and actions history. Insert the adopted date and save in S:\RESOLUTIONS- PROCLAMATIONS-TRIBUTES\Year\DRAFT as Resolution No. 20**-** Abandonment - Budd Street - SIGNATURE). Publish to PDF and save a copy of the PDF in the property subdirectory. 7. Print a copy of the “clean” resolution and give to the City Clerk to obtain Mayor and Council President signatures. 8. Once the Council agenda is finalized, print the agenda and highlight the abandonment. Place in abandonment file. Print relevant material from the Council Packet and place in the file as well. 9. If Council approves the resolution, the public hearing will be advertised in the Delaware State News. It is suggested that the ad be prepared at this point so that it will be ready to submit immediately after the Council Meeting (see Item #4, next section).

ABANDONMENT OF STREETS OR ALLEYS - IMPROVED - Policy for City Clerk’s Office Page 5 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COUNCIL MEETING OF _______________ 1. Ensure that the Council Public Hearing for the abandonment is listed on the appropriate Council agenda, if a draft agenda is available. 2. Upon Council's adoption, copies of the above resolution (with the adopted date and Mayor and Council President signatures) must be posted by the City Clerk in five (5) public places at least five (5) days prior to the public hearing. Post one (1) copy at City Hall and send a memo (13 - Memo to Tax Assessor Requesting Posting of Resolution), along with four (4) copies of the resolution, to the Tax Assessor requesting them to distribute/post the resolutions at Reed Street, the Library, the Pitts Center, and the Kent County Administration Building. Request confirmation from the Tax Assessor. 3. Scan the signed resolution and save PDF in S:\RESOLUTIONS- PROCLAMATIONS-TRIBUTES\Year\ADOPTED as Resolution No. 20**-** - Resolution Setting a Public Hearing - Abandonment - Budd Street. Post the signed resolution on the city’s website, update status to “ADOPTED”, and update the status on the Resolution Listing. Index the resolution in Fortis in the City of Dover database as a Ceremonial Document. Save a copy of the PDF in the property subdirectory. Save the original in the property folder. 4. The City Clerk’s Office shall prepare a notice of Council’s Public Hearing (14 - Ad - City Council Public Hearing) to be published in a local newspaper (not officially required) prior to the date of the Public Hearing. Submit the notice via email to legalads@newszap.com at the Delaware State News in Microsoft Word format. Print the email and attachment (ad) for the file. 5. Set a tickler notice to verify that the ad was placed in the Delaware State News (DSN) on the requested date (Example: If the ad was to appear in the DSN on 04/07/2010, set a reminder in Outlook for 04/07/2010 to check the DSN for the ad). Be sure to make a copy of the ad in the newspaper for the file. Index ad in Fortis (General Files Public - Advertisement). Circulate ad to Clerk’s Office staff to delete related emails from Microsoft Outlook. 6. Post the Notice of Public Hearing to the City’s home page as a Public Announcement. (Example: Resolution No. 2013-02 - City Council Public Hearing - February 11, 2013 - Alley Abandonment - 971 and 975 Forest Street) 7. A resolution will be prepared to abandon the alley/street to be presented to Council during the Public Hearing scheduled for _______________Open S:\RESOLUTION & PROCLAMATION\Resolution Listing (Current Year) to determine the number for the resolution. Add the resolution to the Resolution Listing. 8. Prepare the resolution abandoning the alley/street (15 - Resolution Abandoning Alley). The description provided by the Public Works Director should be incorporated into the resolution and the resolution should be saved in S:RESOLUTIONS - PROCLAMATIONS-TRIBUTES\Year\DRAFT (Example: Resolution No. 2014-01 - Street Abandonment - Budd Street). Publish to PDF and save. Place a copy of PDF in the property subdirectory.

ABANDONMENT OF STREETS OR ALLEYS - IMPROVED - Policy for City Clerk’s Office Page 6 9. Place one (1) copy of the resolution in the abandonment folder. (If adopted, the resolution will be incorporated into the Council Meeting minutes.) Electronic and PDF versions of the resolution and a PDF of the map should be provided to the Administrative Assistant for the Council packet. 10. Post the resolution to the City of Dover website as a draft resolution and update the resolution Listing. 11. Prepare a “clean” copy of the resolution by removing line numbers, “draft” watermark, and “proposed” from the resolution title, header on second page, and actions history. Insert the adopted date and save in the property subdirectory. Public to PDF and save in S:\RESOLUTIONS-PROCLAMATIONS- TRIBUTES\Year\DRAFT (Example: Resolution No. 2014-02 - Abandonment - Budd Street). 12. Print a copy of the “clean” resolution and give to the City Clerk to obtain Mayor and Council President signatures. 13. Once the Council agenda is finalized, print the agenda and highlight the abandonment. Place in abandonment file. Print relevant material from the Council Packet and place it in the file as well. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING OF________________ 1. If the Abandonment was approved: A. Scan the signed resolution and save PDF in S:\RESOLUTIONS- PROCLAMATIONS-TRIBUTES\Year\ADOPTED as Resolution No. 20**-** - Resolution Setting a Public Hearing - Abandonment - Budd Street - ADOPTED AND SIGNED. Post the signed resolution on the city’s website, update status to “ADOPTED”, and update the status on the Resolution Listing. Index the resolution in Fortis in the City of Dover database as a Ceremonial Document. Save a copy of the PDF in the property subdirectory. Save the original in the property folder. B. The City Assessor may hold a legal bidding process for the property if the abandonment is for an improved street/alley. Results of bids will be forwarded to the Legislative and Finance Committee for review and recommendation to Council. Council has the right to accept or reject any bid. C. Send a letter with a copy of the signed resolution attached to applicant, participating property owners, and all contacts (16 - Approval Letter) advising them of the abandonment. Enclose the map that shows the abandoned portions of the street/alley. Send an electronic copy of the letter to the City Planner, City Assessor, Director of Public Works, and GIS Manager.

ABANDONMENT OF STREETS OR ALLEYS - IMPROVED - Policy for City Clerk’s Office Page 7 C. Send a letter to the Deputy City Solicitor (17 - Request for Preparation of Deeds), along with the resolution and copies of the notification letter (s) that were sent to participating property owners. Set a tickler in Outlook to follow up with the Deputy City Solicitor two (2) months after submission of the documentation. Make sure that the map of the abandoned portions of the street/alley is included. E. Update the Recorder of Deeds Summary (S:Clerk’s Office/Recorder of Deeds/Summary of Deeds/Recorder of Deeds Log) to include the deeds as pending recording. Set an Outlook tickler to follow up on receipt of the recorded deeds after two (2) months. F. After new deeds are prepared by the Solicitor, they will be forwarded to the Mayor and City Clerk for signatures. Make copies of all documents for the file. The Solicitor will then have the signed deeds recorded with the Kent County Recorder of Deeds. The fully executed deed, and a bill for conveyance costs, will be sent to those involved in the property transfer by the Solicitor. G. The original recorded deed will be retained by the property owner. A copy of the recorded deed should be received from the City Solicitor. Follow up with Tax Assessor and City Solicitor. Upon receipt, email the deed to the Tax Assessor (Cheryl Russell) and the GIS Manager (Mark Nowak) (18 - Email to Tax Assessor and GIS Manager - Recorded Deeds Received). H. All documents in the abandonment file folder should be scanned and indexed into the City Council and City Clerk Database in Fortis (Property Files, Document Type - Abandonments). Once final, the file folder shall be transferred and filed in the filing cabinet in the safe. 2. If the Abandonment was denied: A. Update the status of the resolution on the city's website as "DENIED" and update the status on the Resolution Listing. B. Send a letter to the applicant and all participating property owner (19 - Denial Letter) advising the them of the denial. C. All documents in the abandonment file folder should be scanned and indexed into the City Council and City Clerk Database in Fortis (Property Files, Document Type - Abandonments). After all files have been scanned, the file folder shall be transferred and filed in the filing cabinet in the safe. Forms kept in S:\CLERK'S OFFICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES\ABANDONMENTS\BLOCKS\IMPROVED as follows: 1 - Verification of Owner of Record 7 - Adjacent Property Owners Data 2 - File Folder Label 8 - Applicant Meeting Notification 3 - Contact List 9 - Adjacent Property Owner Notification 4 - Email to Public Works Director - Improved vs. 10 - Ad - Planning Commission Public Hearing Unimproved 11 - Email to Public Works Director - Request for 5 - Email to City Manager - Meeting Dates CAF and Map 6 - Email to Public Works Director - Request for 12 - Resolution Setting the Public Hearing Map and Adjacent Owners 13 - Memo to Tax Assessor Requesting Posting of

ABANDONMENT OF STREETS OR ALLEYS - IMPROVED - Policy for City Clerk’s Office Page 8 Resolution 17 - Request for Preparation of Deeds 14 - Ad - City Council Public Hearing 18 - Email to Tax Assessor and GIS Manager - 15 - Resolution Abandoning Alley Recorded Deeds Received 16 - Approval Letter 19 - Denial Letter Unimproved Alley - is normally abandoned to adjacent property owners at cost of conveyance. Improved Alley - is normally disposed of by abandonment through legal bidding process. S:\CLERK'S OFFICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES\ABANDONMENTS\PROCEDURE\Abandonments Improved Alley-Streets Procedure (02-28-2014).wpd Prepared by: City Clerk's Office /js Revised 10/16/13

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: City Council DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Manager’s Office DATE SUBMITTED: June 22, 2016 PREPARED BY: Scott D. Koenig, P.E., City Manager SUBJECT: Electric Rates & Tariffs – Transmission Voltage Federal Government Classification (“FT”) REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: N/A REVIEWED BY: Scott D. Koenig, P.E., City Manager, Donna Mitchell, Controller EXHIBITS: Exhibit A – Transmission Voltage Federal Government Classification (“FT”) Tariff Sheet; Exhibit B – Correspondence dated November 17, 2015 from the City of Dover EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: N/A AMOUNT BUDGETED: N/A FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): N/A TIME TIMETABLE: Implement upon Council approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the City Manager to implement the Transmission Voltage Federal Government Classification (“FT”) Rate & Tariff. The effective date will be back dated to July 1, 2015 and all necessary billing adjustments will be implemented. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS On July 1, 2015, the current rates for all electric customers were implemented in accordance with the FY-2016 City of Dover budget authorization. The new electric rates resulted in an increase of approximately 3.4 percent for the Dover Air Force Base. Under a 1954 agreement, the City of Dover was to provide notice of a rate increase to Dover Air Force Base in advance of implementation. Current City management was not aware of the notice requirement in advance of implementation and therefore did not notice the Air Force of the proposed rate increase. The Air Force contacted the City of Dover in August 2015 regarding the rate increase. The City of Dover issued a formal correspondence in November 2015 explaining the rate increase. Subsequent conversations over the past six (6) months have included a review of the rate model with Burns & McDonnell as well as input from various consultant advocates working for the Air Force. After conducting a full rate review of the all documents, the City of Dover and the Air Force have agreed on a final rate acceptable to both parties. The rate of 0.06370 $/KGH adopted in July 2015 will be reduced to 0.0635 $/KGH. The proposed rate adjustment will reduce electric revenues from the Dover Air Force Base by approximately $9,500 - $18,000 per year depending upon actual energy consumption at the facility.

Exhibit A TRANSMISSION VOLTAGE FEDERAL GOVERMENT CLASSIFICATION “FT” AVAILABILITY This rate is available by special contract throughout the City of Dover electric service area for Federal Government customers located where Dover's existing facilities are adequate to supply the character of service as specified below. CHARACTER OF SERVICE The electric power delivered hereunder shall be three phase, 60 cycle, alternating current at a nominal potential of sixty-nine thousand (69,000) volts. Demand, energy and power factor will be metered at the point of delivery of service. All transformation, circuiting and protective apparatus beyond the point of delivery shall be installed, owned and maintained by the customer. Service shall be supplied and metered at 69,000 volts, and the customer is required to own and maintain all transforming, switching and protective equipment. Demand Charge All KW - per KW 10.50 Energy Charge All KWH, per KWH 0.0635 DETERMINATION OF DEMAND The measured demand shall be the average of the four (4) greatest sixty (60) minute demands measured on separate days of each month. In any month in which the average power factor at the delivery point is greater or less than ninety-eight and one half percent (98.5%), the measured demand shall be corrected in accordance with the following formula: Billing Demand = Measured demand x . 985 Average Power Factor The City measures both leading and lagging power factor, treating both as non-unity power factors and the customers are billed accordingly. MINIMUM MONTHLY BILL The minimum monthly charge shall be seventy-five percent (75%) of the greatest Billing Demand during the preceding 11 months and energy equal to three hundred (300) hours' use of that demand. PURCHASE POWER ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Power Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2015

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-16 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL 2 MET: 3 That Chapter 22 - Building and Building Regulations, Article X - Rental Dwellings, Division 1 - Generally, 4 Section 22-331 - Purpose; applicability; definitions; compliance, (c) - Definitions, (5) - Single-family 5 dwellings of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text indicated in red strikeout and inserting the 6 bold, blue text, as follows: 7 (5) Single-family dwellings means dwelling units operated singly, and separated from other units. 8 In general, this definition shall apply to single-family detached dwellings, including; mobile 9 homes and manufactured homes;, and attached units, including duplexes, and townhouses. 10 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 11 That Chapter 26 - Businesses, Article II - Licenses, Section 26-31 - Definitions of the Dover Code be 12 amended by deleting the definitions indicated in red strikeout, inserting the definitions indicated in bold, 13 blue text, and placing the new definition in the correct alphabetical order, as follows: 14 Land Lease Community Operator includes every person engaged in the business of providing 15 home sites and facilities, for rent or lease, to owners of separately owned dwellings, including owners 16 of mobile homes and manufactured homes. 17 Mobile home park includes every person engaged in the business of providing space and 18 facilities for rent or lease to owners of mobile home units, on a permanent or semipermanent basis. 19 Trailer park, recreational vehicle park and tenting recreation park include any person engaged 20 in the business of operating any place where space is furnished for units to park and hook up to or 21 use sanitary and/or electrical facilities. This definition shall not apply to mobile home parks. 22 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 23 That Chapter 50 - Floods, Article III - Requirements in All Special Flood Hazard Areas, Section 50-36 - 24 Recreational Vehicles of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text indicated in red strikeout and 25 inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 26 Sec. 50-36. - Recreational vehicles. 27 (a) Recreational vehicles in special flood hazard areas shall be fully licensed and ready for highway use, 28 and shall be placed on a site for less than 180 consecutive days. 29 (b) Recreational vehicles that are not fully licensed and ready for highway use, or that are to be placed 30 on a site for more than 180 consecutive days, shall meet the requirements of section 50-38 for 31 manufactured homes are prohibited in special flood hazard areas.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 2 32 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 33 That Chapter 66, Manufactured Homes and Trailers, of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text 34 indicated in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 35 CHAPTER 66 - MANUFACTURED HOMES AND TRAILERS, MOBILE HOMES, AND LAND 36 LEASE COMMUNITIES 37 Sec. 66-1. - Definitions. 38 39 The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed 40 to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: 41 Land lease community means a residential development typified by single ownership of the land 42 within the development, with the landowner retaining the rights of ownership. Home sites or 43 individual lots within the community are leased to individual homeowners, who retain customary 44 leasehold rights. 45 Manufactured home means a factory-built housing unit designed and constructed to meet the 46 Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards of the U.S. Department of Housing and 47 Urban Development (HUD) Code. A manufactured home is built on a chassis that supports the 48 structural integrity of the home and to allow transport to the site. Factory-built units built to meet the 49 HUD Code and constructed after the code took effect on June 15, 1976 are classified as 50 "manufactured homes." 51 Mobile home means a single-family dwelling designed for transportation, after fabrication, on 52 streets and highways on its own wheels or on flatbeds or other trailers, and arriving at the site where 53 it is to be occupied as a dwelling, complete and ready for occupancy, except for minor and incidental 54 unpacking and assembly operations, location of jacks or foundations, connections to utilities and the 55 like. The term "mobile home" shall not include a single-family dwelling which is designed to be placed 56 on a permanent foundation, is not designed to be readily movable after the original occupancy as a 57 single-family dwelling, and conforms to the city's building, plumbing, electrical and housing codes 58 factory-built housing unit constructed on a chassis and completed before June 15, 1976. Prior to the 59 HUD code, mobile homes were not subject to uniform construction or safety standards. 60 Permanently placed mobile home means a single-family dwelling designed for transportation, 61 after fabrication, on streets and highways on its own wheels or on flatbeds or other trailers, and 62 arriving at the site where it is to be occupied as a dwelling, complete and ready for occupancy, except 63 for placement upon a permanent, unmovable foundation, removal of all wheels and axles, and other 64 minor incidental operations, such as unpacking, connections or utilities and the like. The term 65 "permanently placed mobile home" shall be construed as being synonymous with that of the term 66 "single-family dwelling," a dwelling which is designed to be placed on a permanent foundation, is not 67 designed to be readily movable after the original occupancy as a single-family dwelling, and conforms 68 to the city's building, plumbing, electrical and housing codes, except for the purpose of zoning in 69 which it shall be considered a mobile home. 70 Owner of a manufactured home or mobile home means the person designated in the vehicle title 71 of the manufactured home or mobile home, whether the title is issued by this state or by some other state.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 3 72 Owner of a permanently placed mobile home manufactured home means the person designated 73 in the vehicle or real property title of the mobile home permanently placed manufactured home, 74 whether the title is issued by this state or by some other state, and such person must also be the owner of 75 the lot upon which the mobile home is permanently affixed. The term "lot" shall mean a parcel of 76 land that conforms to the multiple ownership provisions of the laws of the state dealing with unit 77 properties and condominiums, and must be located within a mobile home park. 78 Permanently placed manufactured home means a factory-built housing unit designed and 79 constructed to meet the Manufactured Home Consturction and Safety Standards of the U.S. 80 Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Code, and that has also been placed upon 81 a permanent, unmovable foundation. 82 (Ord. of 2-23-1970, § 2; Code 1981, § 12-1; Ord. of 11-10-1986, § 1) 83 Sec. 66-2. - Licenses. 84 (a) Required fee. The owner of a mobile home or manufactured home that is not to be permanently 85 placed shall obtain an annual license for it and shall pay a fee for such license as provided for in 86 Appendix F-Fees and Fines. 87 (b) Payment; penalties. Such license shall be obtained and the license fee paid by July August 1 of each 88 year and if such fee is not paid before August September 1 of such year, then, in addition to any 89 penalty incurred pursuant to Appendix F-Fees and Fines, a penalty fee of ten percent per month shall 90 accrue on the unpaid balance of the license fee. 91 (c) Moving into city. Upon the moving of a mobile home manufactured home into the city, such if the 92 manufactured home requires a license it shall be obtained and the license fee paid within seven 93 days. Payment of such license fee shall be prorated on a quarterly basis for each fractional part of a 94 year during which the mobile home manufactured home is in the city. 95 (d) Sticker; where placed. Once the annual license fee has been paid by the owner of a mobile 96 home, he shall be issued a sticker or other evidence of payment by the city manager or his 97 authorized agent. This sticker or other evidence of payment must be placed upon the mobile 98 home on the front of the mobile home facing the street on the righthand side when facing said 99 mobile home one foot up from the bottom of the skirting and one foot over from the side of the 100 mobile home. 101 (d) Required fee for landowners. The owner of any land leased out as part of a land lease 102 community shall obtain an annual land lease community operator business license under the 103 provisions of Chapter 26 - Businesses. 104 (Ord. of 2-23-1970, § 2; Ord. of 5-24-1976; Ord. of 3-27-1980; Code 1981, § 12-2; Ord. of 8-8-1988; Ord. 105 of 3-22-1993; Ord. No. 2009-09, 6-22-2009)

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 4 106 Sec. 66-3. - Real property taxes. 107 A permanently placed mobile home manufactured home as defined in section 66-1, and the lot 108 upon which it is located shall be considered as being real property for purposes of valuation, assessment and 109 taxation in accordance with section 47 of the Charter, but shall be considered a mobile home as defined 110 in section 66-1 for purposes of zoning and shall only be permitted to be located in the mobile home 111 park zone (MPH), as spelled out in appendix B to this Code (article 3, section 8). This section shall not 112 apply to permanently placed mobile homes that were in place on January 1, 1985, which shall 113 continue to be licensed in accordance with section 66-2. 114 (Code 1981, § 12-2.1; Ord. of 11-10-1986, § 2) 115 Sec. 66-4. - Placement permit. 116 Every owner of a mobile home manufactured home, before moving the same into the city, shall 117 apply for and obtain from the city manager planner or his/her authorized agent a placement permit for such 118 mobile home manufactured home. The city manager planner or his/her authorized agent shall issue no 119 placement permit until the license fee required in this chapter is paid in full. 120 (Ord. of 2-23-1970, §§ 3, 6; Ord. of 5-24-1976; Code 1981, § 12-3) 121 Sec. 66-5. - Duties of mobile home park land lease community owners and operators. 122 (a) Documents to mobile home owners. Copies of this chapter and placement permit application 123 forms shall be furnished to each mobile home park operator, who shall give a copy of the same 124 to every mobile home owner who moves a mobile home into his park, before the 15th day of 125 the next succeeding month after placement of the mobile home. 126 (b) Lease record; report. Mobile home park operators who lease land to two or more persons for 127 parking mobile homes shall maintain a lease record, which shall be open for inspection at all 128 reasonable times by the city manager. Before June 1 of each year, the mobile home park 129 operator shall report to the city manager the names and addresses of all persons having mobile 130 homes on his land. 131 (Ord. of 2-23-1970, §§ 4, 5, 7; Code 1981, § 12-4) 132 (a) The following regulations shall apply to owners and operators of all land lease communities: 133 i. Private road access. It shall be the responsibility of land lease community owners and 134 operators to maintain all private streets, driveway access to such streets, access to fire 135 hydrants, and access to central mailboxes so as to be clear from obstructions, including but 136 not limited to potholes, snow piles, and debris. 137 ii. Debris clearance. It shall be the responsibility of land lease community owners and 138 operators to ensure that all facilities and common areas within the community are kept in 139 good repair and maintained in such a manner as to prevent the accumulation of materials 140 which could cause a fire hazard or would cause insect or rodent breeding and harborage.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 5 141 iii. Landscaping. All trees, shrubbery, lawns, and other landscaping features within the 142 community shall be maintained by the land lease community operator to be in healthy 143 condition at all times. 144 iv. Utilities. All water, sewer, electric, and gas lines and connections intended to serve common 145 areas or the private property of tenants within the community shall be kept in good repair 146 at all times by the land lease community operator. Stormwater management facilities shall 147 be maintained so as to be free of blockage and to prevent the accumulation of standing 148 water. 149 v. Office hours. The land lease community operator shall be present on site at a minimum 150 during regular business hours, so as to facilitate communication between tenants of the 151 community and the owner, and a 24-hour emergency contact shall be available to residents. 152 vi. Receipt for lot payment. The Land Lease community operator shall provide a written 153 receipt or electronic receipt at the time rent payment has been made, regardless of the form 154 of payment. 155 (b) The following regulations shall additionally apply to owners and operators of land lease 156 communities leasing land to manufactured homes: 157 i. Documents to manufactured home owners. Copies of this chapter and placement permit 158 application forms shall be furnished to each land lease community owner, who shall give 159 a copy of the same to every manufactured home owner who moves a manufactured home 160 into the community, before the 15th day of the next succeeding month after placement of 161 the manufactured home. 162 ii. Enforcement. It shall be the responsibility of land lease community owners and operators 163 to ensure that all mobile homes and manufactured homes placed on their land maintain 164 a current license under Section 66-2. 165 iii. Lease record; report. Land lease community owners who lease land to two or more 166 persons for siting manufactured homes shall maintain a lease record, which shall be open 167 for inspection at all reasonable times by the city planner. Before June 1 of each year, the 168 land lease community owner shall report to the city planner the names and addresses of 169 all persons having manufactured homes on his land. 170 iv. Sale of home. Before a home is sold by the homeowner, home owner’s estate, foreclosure, 171 eviction or other means, the City of Dover must be notified and all delinquent taxes, fees, 172 or other charges must be paid. 173 v. The land lease community owner must notify the City of Dover if the community is placed 174 for sale.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 6 175 (c) The following shall be considered appropriate methods of redress if the duties outlined in this 176 section are not fulfilled: 177 i. Any land lease community owner found to be in violation of the provisions of this section, 178 regardless of corrective actions taken, shall be assessed a fine as provided for in Appendix 179 F- Fees and Fines. Any such fine shall be in addition to any charges imposed upon the 180 violator in accordance with subsection (c)(ii) below. 181 ii. If required, the City of Dover may perform maintenance in the owner's stead following 182 official notice, and place a lien on the property to recover costs, including a 15% 183 administrative charge. 184 iii. Repeated failure to perform the required duties shall be cause to take action upon an 185 owner's land lease community operator license in accordance with the provisions of 186 Chapter 26 - Businesses, Article II, Section 26-59. 187 Sec. 66-6. - Anchoring and skirting. 188 Within 30 days after Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for of all mobile homes, 189 the mobile homes any manufactured home not placed on a permanent foundation, the manufactured 190 home shall be firmly anchored to the ground and the open space beneath the unit shall be skirted with 191 approved material in accordance with the requirements of the building inspector. 192 (Ord. of 9-13-1976; Code 1981, § 12-5) 193 Sec. 66-7. - Use of city utilities. 194 The owner or occupant of any mobile home or manufactured home shall not be entitled to receive 195 city utilities until the license fee required in this chapter is paid in full, and city personnel shall refuse to 196 provide sewage, water and electricity to the mobile home or manufactured home until satisfactory proof 197 is furnished that such license fee has been paid. 198 (Ord. of 7-28-1975; Code 1981, § 12-6) 199 Sec. 66-8. - Exemptions. 200 This chapter shall not apply to: 201 (1) Dealers. Unoccupied mobile home manufactured homes located on a dealer's display lot; or 202 (2) State license tag Manufactured homes in transit. Mobile homes bearing a current license tag 203 of this state Unoccupied manufactured homes temporarily occupying the public right-of-way prior 204 to placement on a lot or home site. 205 (Ord. of 2-23-1970, § 8; Code 1981, § 12-7)

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 7 206 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 207 That Chapter 102 - Taxation, Article III - Realty Transfer Tax, Section 102-71 - Definitions, (a)(1)s of the 208 Dover Code be amended by deleting the text indicated in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, as 209 follows: 210 s. Any conveyance of a "mobile home," or “manufactured home” as defined in 25 Del. C. § 7003; 211 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 212 That Chapter 106 - Traffic and Vehicles, Article III - Stopping, Standing and Parking, Division 1 - 213 Generally, Section 106-123 - Vehicle Parking Time Limited Where Carrying Capacity Is in Excess of One 214 Ton and Section 106-128 - Parking Mobile Homes, etc. of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text 215 indicated in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 216 Sec. 106-123. - Vehicle parking time limited where carrying capacity is in excess of one ton, and trailer 217 and motor home recreational vehicle parking. 218 (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to park any vehicle with a carrying capacity of more than one ton, 219 any trailer, which includes, but is not limited to, boat, utility, construction or one that is used to carry 220 goods regardless of weight capacity and is designed to be towed or pulled by another vehicle, or any 221 vehicle or trailer on the city streets for a period longer than two consecutive hours. 222 (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to park any commercial vehicle with a carrying capacity of more 223 than one ton, any trailer, which includes, but is not limited to, utility, construction or one that is used 224 to carry goods regardless of weight capacity and is designed to be towed or pulled by another vehicle, 225 or any vehicle or trailer combination thereof, or any travel trailer in any residential zone in the city 226 except for temporary parking for immediate deliveries, pickups, and/or service calls to residences 227 or for construction work on residential properties. A commercial vehicle shall be one which is used 228 or maintained for the transportation of persons or property for hire, compensation or profit, except 229 taxicabs. 230 (c) It shall be unlawful for any person to park a trailered boat under 25 feet on the streets of Dover for 231 a period longer than 12 consecutive hours. For any trailered boat 25 or greater, refer to subsection 232 (a). 233 (d) It shall be unlawful for any motor home recreational vehicle to park on any residential street for 234 a period longer than 12 consecutive hours without a permit. A resident owner of a motor home 235 recreational vehicle may request a parking permit from the city to park on a residential street in the 236 vicinity of their residence for a period not to exceed 72 hours. The permit would be made available 237 at no cost to the resident. The parking permit shall be displayed in the front window of the vehicle 238 visible from the street. A resident may only request such a permit three times in any 12-month 239 period. 240 (e) Nonresidents are exempt from subsection (d) for a period of up to seven days as long as their motor 241 home or travel trailer recreational vehicle does not create a safety hazard or interfere with traffic 242 in the residential area that they are parked in.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 8 243 (f) All parking allowed in this section only applies to streets that can accommodate parking in 244 compliance with appendix A, article VI, section A. 245 (Code 1981, § 13-30.2; Ord. of 2-22-1982; Ord. of 9-10-1990; Ord. of 12-11-1995; Ord. of 7-25-2005) 246 Sec. 106-128. - Parking mobile homes Occupancy of recreational vehicles, etc. 247 It shall be unlawful and a nuisance to keep, either as owner, tenant or possessor, any mobile home 248 recreational vehicle, bus, motor vehicle, portable structure or vehicle of any kind designed or adapted 249 for long-term occupancy, except while it is being used as a business office in connection with the 250 construction of a permanent building or structure on the same premises. The person desiring to park and use 251 the vehicle or structure as a construction business office shall first obtain a permit therefor from the city 252 manager, and the permit shall be effective for no more than six months, but in no event for longer than the 253 period of construction. 254 (Code 1968, § 17-62; Code 1981, § 13-35) 255 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 256 That Chapter 110 - Utilities, Article III - Water Service, Division 3 - Water Impact Fees, Section 110-207 - 257 Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units, (a)(1) of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text 258 indicated in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 259 (a) Determination for residential dwellings. Whenever by ordinance or by contract the city imposes or 260 assesses water charges or fees on the basis of EDUs, an EDU shall be determined in the same 261 manner as wastewater collection charges or fees and as defined in the most recent impact fee 262 ordinance adopted by Kent County Levy Court. An EDU for a residential dwelling shall be 263 determined as follows: 264 (1) Houses, dwellings, mobile homes, manufactured homes, and apartments with one kitchen and 265 one or more baths and bedrooms separate from the kitchen .....1.0 EDU 266 (2) Efficiency unit or cottage having a living space in one room and having one bath .....1.0 EDU 267 (3) Dwelling with one kitchen and one or more baths and bedrooms separate from the kitchen and 268 attached to other dwellings or structures .....1.0 EDU 269 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 270 That Chapter 110 - Utilities, Article IV - Sanitary Sewer Service, Division 3 - Wastewater Collection Impact 271 Fees, Section 110-282 - Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units, (a)(1) of the Dover Code be amended 272 by deleting the text indicated in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 273 (a) Determination for residential dwellings. Whenever by ordinance or by contract the city imposes or 274 assesses wastewater collection and transmission charges or fees on the basis of EDUs, an EDU shall 275 be determined as defined in the most recent impact fee ordinance adopted by the Levy Court of the 276 county. An EDU for a residential dwelling shall be determined as follows:

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 9 277 (1) Houses, dwellings, mobile homes, manufactured homes, and apartments with one kitchen and 278 one or more baths and bedrooms separate from the kitchen .....1.0 EDU 279 (2) Efficiency unit or cottage having a living space in one room and having one bath .....1.0 EDU 280 (3) Dwelling with one kitchen and one or more baths and bedrooms separate from the kitchen and 281 attached to other dwellings or structures .....1.0 EDU 282 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 283 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 2 - Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map, Section 1 - List of Zones of the 284 Dover Code be amended by deleting the text indicated in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text in 285 the correct alphabetical order, as follows: 286 Manufactured housing zone .....MH 287 Mobile home park zone .....MHP 288 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 289 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 8 - Mobile Home Park Zone (MHP) of 290 the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text indicated in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, 291 as follows: 292 Section 8. - Mobile home park zone (MHP) Manufactured Housing Zone (MH). 293 8.1 Uses permitted. In a manufactured housing zone, No no building or premises shall be used, and 294 no building shall be erected, which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any 295 purpose, except as a mobile home park for the leasing of mobile home stands for mobile homes 296 designed for single-family occupancy, provided that for any uses, except the following: 297 8.11 The minimum number of mobile home stands completed and ready for occupancy 298 before the first mobile home is permitted on the premises for residential use is 35 299 mobile home stands. Manufactured homes on individual lots, held in any type of 300 ownership. 301 8.12 No mobile home stand shall be leased or occupied for residential use of a mobile home, 302 except for periods of 30 consecutive days or more. Multiple manufactured homes on 303 a lot, provided that: 304 (a) The lot is operated as a condominium; or 305 (b) The lot is operated as a land lease community; and 306 (c) There are at least 15 manufactured homes on the lot, or else sufficient home sites 307 for rent or sale on the lot to accommodate 15 manufactured homes. Such home sites 308 need not be expressly delineated but must be improved so as to be complete and 309 ready for occupancy by a manufactured home.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 10 310 8.13 No mobile home shall be permitted in any mobile home park unless it can be 311 demonstrated that the mobile home meets the requirements of the United States of America 312 Standards Institute publication "Standard for Mobile Homes, Body and Frame Design and 313 Construction Requirements and the Installation of Plumbing, Heating and Electrical 314 Systems," USA Standard A119, 1-1969. One-family detached homes on individual lots, held 315 in any type of ownership. 316 8.14 The entire land area occupied by a mobile home park shall be maintained in single 317 ownership throughout the entire life of the mobile home park or in multiple ownership under 318 the provisions of the laws of the State of Delaware dealing with unit properties and 319 condominiums, subject to the following requirements: 320 (a) Multiple ownership shall not be permitted in existing parks previously in single 321 ownership; 322 (b) Multiple ownership shall be permitted only in new established parks where application 323 is made for multiple ownership at the time the application to establish the mobile home 324 park is presented to the planning commission. 325 8.15 A permanent standard residence for not more than one family shall be permitted, 326 incidental to each mobile home park, for the use of the owner, manager or caretaker of the 327 mobile home park. 328 8.16 A permanent management office facility shall be permitted, which may include only the 329 following: 330 (a) A management office with rooms for the usual office furniture and supplies; 331 (b) Storage space for utility connection supplies in quantity, mobile home accessories and 332 maintenance materials and equipment; 333 (c) Laundry facilities equipped with washing machines and dryers; 334 (d) Community building facilities, including indoor recreation areas; 335 (e) One beauty shop and/or one barbershop in each mobile home park complex. 336 8.17 Maintenance of private streets. In mobile home parks with private streets, such streets, 337 driveway access to such streets, access to fire hydrants, and access to central mailboxes shall 338 be maintained by the mobile home park so as to be clear of obstructions including, but not 339 limited to, potholes, snow piles, and debris. 340 8.18 Signs shall meet the regulations found in article 5, section 4, supplementary sign 341 regulations.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 11 342 8.2 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with article 343 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for the erection 344 of any buildings and mobile home stands and related accessory structures. After initial site 345 development plan approval, reapproval shall not be required prior to the issuance of building 346 permits for the alterations to individual mobile home stands or accessory buildings such as 347 storage areas and patios, which, in the judgment of the city planner, do not materially alter 348 the site development plan approval by the planning commission and are requested as 349 adjustments to the mobile home lot leased by an individual family and designed for the 350 convenience and comfort of the individual lessee. Conditional uses. Conditional uses shall be 351 consistent with those conditionally permitted in the One-Family Residence Zones. 352 8.21 For purposes of preparing a site development plan for approval by the planning 353 commission, and all subsequent improvements, alterations or additions, the applicant shall 354 conform to current submission requirements and site development standards as set forth by 355 the National Fire Protection Association publication 501A, "Standards for Mobile Home 356 Parks." Where applicable, the approving authority shall be the Dover Planning Commission. 357 8.3 Maximum density. The gross residential density in an MHP zone shall not exceed six dwelling 358 units per acre. Accessory uses. Accessory uses shall be consistent with those permitted in the 359 One-Family Residence Zones, with the following additions and exceptions: 360 8.31 Management facilities. The following shall be permitted accessory to lots providing 361 home sites for multiple manufactured homes: 362 (a) Management offices with rooms for the usual office furniture and supplies, limited 363 to one per lot; 364 (b) Storage space for utility connection supplies in quantity, manufactured home 365 accessories and maintenance materials and equipment; 366 (c) Laundry facilities equipped with washing machines and dryers; 367 (d) Community building facilities, including indoor recreation areas; 368 (e) Commercial establishments consistent with uses permitted in the C-1 Neighborhood 369 Commercial Zone, limited to one such establishment per lot; 370 (f) One-family detached homes intended for the use of a manager or caretaker, limited 371 to one such dwelling per lot. 372 8.32 Accessory home occupations. Accessory home occupations shall be permitted consistent 373 with the conditions outlined for home occupations in the One-Family Residence Zones, 374 with the exception that no home occupation shall be permitted if not also permitted by 375 the owner of the lot on which the home is sited.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 12 376 8.4 Uses prohibited. The following uses are specifically prohibited: 377 8.41 Mobile homes, house trailers, and recreational vehicles as principal uses on a lot. Any 378 such structures or vehicles located within the zone and being used as dwellings shall 379 upon the effective date of this ordinance be deemed non-conforming uses in accordance 380 with article 7. 381 8.42 Any other kind of factory-built housing that does not meet the Manufactured Home 382 Construction and Safety Standards of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban 383 Development (HUD) Code as approved June 15, 1976, unless it can be demonstrated 384 that such housing is constructed to the standards of the Dover Code of Ordinances, 385 Chapter 22 - Buildings and Building Regulations. Any such housing located within the 386 zone and being used as dwellings shall upon the effective date of this ordinance be 387 deemed non-conforming uses in accordance with article 7. 388 8.5 Minimum occupation length. No lot or home site within the Manufactured Housing Zone 389 reserved for occupation by a manufactured home shall be leased or occupied for residential 390 use except for periods of 30 consecutive days or more. 391 8.6 Land Lease Communities. The following regulations shall apply to land lease communities 392 within the MH zone: 393 8.61 The entire land area occupied by a land lease community, regardless of the number of 394 home sites or individual lots therein, shall be maintained in single ownership, or if in 395 multiple ownership, under the provisions of the laws of the State of Delaware dealing 396 with unit properties and condominiums. 397 8.62 Changes to site plan. After initial site development plan approval of a land lease 398 community, reapproval for the entire community shall not be required prior to the 399 issuance of building permits for alterations to individual manufactured homes, or their 400 accessory buildings such as storage areas and patios, which, in the judgement of the city 401 planner, do not materially alter the site development plan approval by the planning 402 commission and are requested as adjustments to the individual manufactured home 403 sites or lots leased by an individual family and designed for the convenience and 404 comfort of the individual lessee. 405 8.7 Performance Standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in article 5, 406 section 8. 407 8.8 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with article 10, 408 section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for the erection or 409 enlargement of all structures and related accessory structures. Such approval shall also be 410 required prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for a change of use. 411 8.81 For purposes of preparing a site development plan for approval by the planning 412 commission, and all subsequent improvements, alterations or additions, the applicant 413 shall conform to current submission requirements and site development standards as 414 set forth by the National Fire Protection Association publication 501A,"Standard for

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 13 415 Fire Safety Criteria for Manufactured Home Installations, Sites, and Communities." 416 Where applicable, the approving authority shall be the Dover Planning Commission. 417 8.82 No site development plan proposing the siting of a manufactured home outside of a 418 land lease community shall be approved unless the plan shows the manufactured home 419 is to be permanently placed, as defined in the Dover Code of Ordinances, Chapter 66 420 - Manufactured Homes, Mobile Homes, and Land Lease Communities. 421 8.9 Maximum density. The gross residential density in an MH zone shall not exceed six dwelling 422 units per acre. 423 8.10 Signs. Signs shall meet the regulations found in Article 5 - Supplementary Regulations, 424 Section 4 - Supplementary Sign Regulations. 425 (Ord. of 10-13-1981; Ord. of 3-20-1983; Ord. of 3-24-1986; Ord. of 7-10-2000; Ord. of 2-12-2001; Ord. of 426 4-28-2008(2); Ord. No. 2010-29, 1-10-2011) 427 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 428 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 22 - Airport Environs Overlay Zone 429 (AEOZ), Subsection 22.6 - Land Use Compatibility Table - Residential of the Dover Code be amended by 430 inserting the bold, blue text in the correct alphabetical order, as follows: 431 Manufactured homes N N N N N N N 432 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 433 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 24 - Planned Neighborhood Design 434 Option [(PND)], Subsection 24.3 - Permitted Uses of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text 435 indicated in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 436 24.3 Permitted uses: 437 (a) Any use permitted in one-family residence zones; 438 (b) Any other residential use, including one-family lot line dwelling units, duplexes, multiplexes, 439 townhouses, patio houses, garden apartments, [and] mid-rise apartments, but not including high-rise 440 apartments, and mobile homes;, or manufactured homes; 441 (c) Accessory dwelling units may be proposed in conjunction with detached single-family houses if 442 approved by the planning commission as an integral part of planned neighborhood design; 443 (d) Commercial uses accessory to the development as a whole in accordance with the standards of the 444 C-1A zone; 445 (e) Under the senior citizen housing option, all housing types, and including congregate housing 446 structures and uses, assisted living residences, and nursing homes. All such housing units and/or 447 property shall be deed restricted to require that the head of household for each housing unit be at 448 least 55 years of age or older.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 14 449 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 450 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 4 - Zoning Bulk and Parking Regulations, Section 4.12 - Mobile Home 451 Park (MHP) Zone of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text indicated in red strikeout and inserting 452 the bold, blue text, as follows: 453 Section 4.12. - Mobile home park (MHP) Manufactured Housing (MH) zone. 454 [(a)] Bulk and parking regulations for the mobile home park (MHP) manufactured housing (MH) zone 455 [are as follows]: Mobile Home Park Individual Individual All Other Manufactured Home Single-Wide Double-Wide Individual Unit Community ($ 15 Unit Lots Unit Lots Lots home sites per lot) 456 Minimum required: 457 Lot area 15 acres 4,000 sq. ft. 5,000 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. 458 Lot width (ft.) 200 40 55 60 459 Front yard (ft.) 40 25 25 25 460 Side yard (ft.) 25 8 8 8 461 Rear yard (ft.) 25 11 11 11 462 Off-street parking space 2 2 2 2 (a) Per mobile home home/home site 2 2 2 2 Per 300 sq. ft. of floor area in permanent (b) 1 management office facility 463 Maximum permitted: Building height of permanent management office facility Stories 2 2 2 2 Feet 30 30 30 30 464 [(b)] Special requirements for corner lots with frontage on two internal streets, public or private, 465 within a mobile home park shall be as follows: 466 1. Minimum lot width for a single-wide unit lot shall be 54 feet, and minimum lot width for a 467 double-wide unit lot shall be 68 feet, and minimum lot width for any other individual unit 468 lot shall be 75 feet. 469 2. The minimum setback for any structure from the edge of the cartway of either street shall be 470 22 feet. 471 3. Off-street parking shall not be permitted within 30 feet of the corner of the lot at the street 472 intersection. 473 [(c)] Special requirements for cul-de-sac streets within a mobile home park lots accessed by cul de 474 sac streets shall be as follows: 475 1. The minimum lot frontage at the edge of the street cartway shall be 16 feet. 476 2. The minimum lot width at the building setback and for the full depth of the lot behind the 477 building setback line shall be 40 feet for a single-wide unit lot area and 55 feet for a 478 double-wide unit lot. (Ord. of 4-28-1986)

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 15 479 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 480 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 5 - Supplementary Regulations, Section 4 - Supplementary Sign 481 Regulations, Subsection 4.7 - Permitted Signs of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text 482 indicated in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 483 4.7 Permitted signs. Signs are permitted in all zones in accordance with the following table, which is 484 a list of permitted sign types by use, proximity to residential uses and road classification. 485 SIGN TABLE 486 Use Permitted Signs Road Percentage Setback Number Max. Max. Exclusio 487 Specific Type Sign Type of Total (R.O.W. Permitted Size Height n Zone Wall Area ) Single-Family Detached/ All Signs permitted in § 4.5 only Semi-Detached Streets Post or 12 1/entrance 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet All Monument S.F. 488 Residential Professional Office Streets 16 489 Uses and Wall 1/frontage N/A # 15% N/A N/A S.F. 490 Nonresidentia Subdivisions 491 l Uses in Multi-Family 32 492 Residential Wall 1/frontage N/A # 15% N/A N/A Residential Uses S.F. 493 Districts All Streets Monument Manufactured Home 32 Parks Housing or Post and 2/entrance 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet S.F. Communities Panel 32 Wall 2/frontage N/A # 15% N/A N/A S.F. Monument 32 Urban or Post and 1/entrance 7 feet N/A 10 feet 20 feet S.F. Principal Panel OR Arterial 16 Post** 1/frontage 7 feet N/A 5 feet 5 feet S.F. Places of Worship 32 494 Nonresidentia Pylon* 1/frontage 30 feet N/A 30 feet 50 feet Daycare Centers S.F. 495 l Uses Approved Conditional Uses 32 496 Adjacent to Wall 2/frontage N/A # 15% N/A N/A Educational/Institution S.F. 497 Residential Urban Monument al 498 Districts or 32 All Other Approved Minor or Post and 1/entrance 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet 499 Uses S.F. Nonresidential Uses Arterial Panel OR 16 Post** 1/frontage 7 feet N/A 5 feet 10 feet S.F. 32 Wall 2/frontage N/A # 15% N/A N/A S.F. UrbanLocal/ Monument Collector 32 or Post and 1/entrance 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet S.F. Panel OR

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 16 16 Post** 1/frontage 7 feet N/A 5 feet 10 feet S.F. No Wall 2/frontage N/A # 15% N/A N/A max Monument 100 Urban or Post and 1/entrance 10 feet N/A 10 feet 20 feet S.F. Principal Panel Arterial Pylon OR 100 1/frontage 30 feet N/A 15 feet 50 feet * S.F. 150 Pylon* 1/frontage 30 feet N/A 31 feet 50 feet S.F. 64 500 Nonresidentia Wall 2/frontage N/A #15% NA N/A S.F. 501 l Uses in Nonresidential Uses Urban Monument 502 Nonresidentia 64 Minor or Post and 1/entrance 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet 503 l Districts S.F. Arterial Panel OR 16 Post** 1/frontage 7 feet N/A 5 feet 10 feet S.F. 32 Wall 2/frontage N/A # 15% N/A N/A S.F. Monument UrbanLocal/ 32 or Post and 1/entrance 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet Collector S.F. Panel OR 16 Post** 1/frontage 7 feet N/A 5 feet 10 feet S.F. 504 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 505 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 6 - Off-Street Parking, Driveways and Loading Facilities, Section 1 - 506 Permitted Accessory Parking of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text indicated in red strikeout 507 and inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 508 Section 1. - Permitted accessory parking. 509 1.1 [Off-street parking spaces.] Off-street parking spaces, open or enclosed, are permitted accessory to 510 any use. One commercial vehicle may be parked on a lot in any residence zone only if less than one 511 ton in carrying capacity. 512 1.12 [1.2] Trailers and boats. The storage or parking and use of a house trailer long-term use of a 513 recreational vehicle as a residence by any person or persons is prohibited in all residential 514 zones, except the mobile home park (MHP) zone. A boat with its trailer, or a utility trailer, 515 and an unoccupied travel trailer under 31 feet body length or an unoccupied motor home 516 recreational vehicle, may be parked within a garage or anywhere behind the setback line if 517 screened from adjacent lots. However, none of the vehicles shall be parked in a required side 518 yard if alley parking adjacent to the lot is available.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 17 519 1.13 [1.3] Driveways. No driveway shall provide access to a lot located in another zone, which lot is used 520 for any use prohibited in the zone in which such driveway is located. 521 1.14 [1.4] The minimum width of a residential driveway shall be nine feet. 522 (Ord. of 9-12-1983; Ord. of 1-10-1996; Ord. of 11-13-2007) 523 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 524 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 7 - Nonconforming Buildings and Uses, Section 1 - Nonconforming 525 Buildings and Uses, Subsection 1.51 of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text indicated in red 526 strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 527 1.5 Each of the nonconforming uses specified below is deemed sufficiently objectionable, undesirable, 528 and out of character in the district in which such use is located as to depreciate the value of other property 529 and uses permitted in the district, and blight the proper and orderly development and general welfare of such 530 district and the city to the point that each of such nonconforming uses shall be terminated on or before the 531 expiration of the specified period of time after the effective date of this ordinance; which period of time is 532 specified for the purpose of permitting the amortization of the remaining value, if any, of such use. 533 1.51 In any residence zone, any nonconforming use of open land, including such uses as a parking 534 lot, junkyard, or open storage yard for materials or equipment, may be continued for three years after 535 the effective date of this ordinance, or after annexation of the property into the City of Dover, 536 provided that, after the expiration of that period, such nonconforming use shall be terminated (see 537 also article 6, section 1.12). Any "house trailer," “mobile home” as that term is defined in article 538 12 hereof, that was located within the limits of the City of Dover at the effective date of this 539 ordinance [November 22, 1976], or that was in place on any land subsequently annexed into the City 540 of Dover, in any zone other than the mobile home park zone (MHP), shall constitute a 541 nonconforming use and shall be permitted to be maintained as a nonconforming use indefinitely. 542 However, such house trailer mobile home shall be required to connect to city sewer and water 543 mains, if available, and such house trailer mobile home shall be subject to and shall comply with 544 all other city codes and ordinances applicable to structures and residences. 545 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 546 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 12 - Definitions of the Dover Code be amended by inserting the 547 following new definitions, indicated in bold, blue text, in the correct alphabetical order: 548 Condominium: A form of property ownership providing for individual ownership of a 549 dwelling unit together with an individual interest in land or parts of a building held in common with 550 other owners. Condominiums follow the provisions of the laws of the State of Delaware dealing with 551 unit properties and condominiums.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 18 552 Land Lease Community: A residential development typified by single ownership of the land 553 within the development, with the landowner retaining the rights of ownership. Home sites or 554 individual lots within the community are leased to individual homeowners, who retain customary 555 leasehold rights. 556 Mobile home: A factory-built housing unit constructed on a chassis and completed before June 557 15, 1976. Prior to the HUD code, mobile homes were not subject to uniform construction or safety 558 standards. 559 Modular Home: A factory built housing unit constructed to the standards of the Dover Code 560 of Ordinances, Chapter 22 - Buildings and Building Regulations. 561 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 562 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 12 - Definitions of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the 563 definitions indicated in red strikeout, as follows: 564 Mobile home: A single-family dwelling designed for transportation, after fabrication, on 565 streets, and highways on its own wheels or on flatbed or other trailers, and arriving at a site in a 566 mobile home park where it is to be occupied as a dwelling, complete and ready for occupancy, except 567 for minor and incidental unpacking and assembly operations, location on jacks or permanent 568 foundations, connections to utilities, and the like; excluding, however, the single-family dwelling 569 which is designed to be readily moveable after the original occupancy as a single-family dwelling, and 570 conforms to the building code, plumbing code, electrical code and housing code of the City of Dover. 571 Single-wide mobile homes are those units built as a complete home measuring up to 14 feet in width 572 and finished on all exterior sides prior to transportation to a site for installation. Double-wide mobile 573 homes are those units built in two halves intended to be assembled together on the site at the time of 574 installation, each half measuring up to 14 feet in width and each finished on three exterior sides. 575 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 576 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 12 - Definitions of the Dover Code be amended by inserting the text 577 indicated in bold, blue text and deleting the text indicated in red strikeout, for the following definitions: 578 Dwelling unit: A building or entirely self-contained portion thereof containing complete 579 housekeeping facilities for only one family, including any domestic servants employed on the premises, and 580 having no enclosed space (other than vestibules, entrance or other hallways or porches) or cooking or 581 sanitary facilities in common with any other dwelling unit. A boarding[house] or roominghouse, 582 convalescent home, dormitory, fraternity or sorority house, hotel, inn, lodging, nursing, or other similar 583 home, house trailer, travel trailer, recreational vehicle, or other similar structures or vehicles shall not 584 be deemed to constitute a dwelling unit.

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 19 585 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 586 That Appendix F - Fees and Fines, Chapter 26 - Businesses, Article II - Licenses, Section 26-35 - License 587 Required; Fees, Subsection (d)(1) - Businesses Licensed of the Dover Code be amended by inserting the 588 bold, blue text and deleting the text indicated in red strikeout, as follows: Fees and Fines 589 Chapter 26 - Businesses, Article II - Licenses 590 Fines not paid within 14 days of the day the fine was issued, including the day the fine was issued, 591 shall be automatically doubled in amount. 592 Sec. 26-35 - License required; fees Subsec. (d)(1) - Businesses licensed Advertising agency $95.00 Amusement operator $157.00 Architect $250.00 Attorney-at-law $313.00 ATM machines (third-party or off bank premises) $50.50 Auctioneer $157.00 Automobile race operator $375.00 Bank, or loan and trust company $313.00 Barber $63.00 each additional chair over two $4.00 Beautician $63.00 each additional chair over two $4.00 Broadcasting station $313.00 Broker $157.00 Car wash $188.00 Certified public accountant $250.00 Cesspool cleaner $125.00 Chiropractor $313.00 Clinical social worker $96.00 $3.00 Coin-operated amusement machine owner Per machine $3.00 Coin-operated vending machine owner Per machine $125.00 Coin-operated electronic video machine Per machine Commercial sign business $125.00

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 20 Computer-related services $125.00 Consultant $50.50 Day care operator: Center or home provider with greater than six children $50.50 Dentist $313.00 Distributor $63.00 Dray person or mover $125.00 Eating establishment and/or eating establishment operator $125.00 Employment agency $125.00 Entertainer: One - three entertainers per group $50.50 Four - nine entertainers per group $95.00 Ten or more $125.00 Entertainment agent $188.00 Finance or small loan agency $250.00 Fitness trainer $69.00 Funeral director $250.00 Gaming position $155.00 Gas, light, power, cable TV and telephone company $938.00 General repairman $63.00 Health spa or health club $188.00 Home day care operator $25.50 Hotel: Per room $9.50 Per suite $12.50 Income tax consultant $188.00 Incorporator $125.00 Insurance adjustor office $125.00 Itinerant merchant, per event $100.00 Janitorial and cleaning service: One - three employees $50.50 Four - nine employees $95.00 Ten or more employees $125.00 Land lease community operator, per home site within $25.00 community Landscape service company: One - three employees $50.50

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 21 Four - nine employees $95.00 Ten or more employees $125.00 Laundry service operator: Primary facility $125.00 Additional drop-off locations $50.50 Linen supplier $125.00 Manicurist $32.00 Manufacturer's agent or representative $125.00 Mercantile agency or collection agency $125.00 Mobile home park, per space $7.00 Motel, per room $7.00 Motion picture theater $188.00 Motor vehicle serviceman $95.00 Nursing, rest or convalescent home $188.00 Open market operator: First 20 spaces, per rented space $22.50 21st - 50th space, per rented space $11.50 Each space over 50, per rented space $6.00 Outdoor tables, per table $6.00 Optometrist $313.00 Pawnbroker $188.00 Pest control services $95.00 Pharmacist $188.00 Photographer $125.00 Physical therapist $188.00 Physician and/or surgeon $313.00 Plant nursery and florist $95.00 Podiatrist $313.00 $63.00/ Pool table operator, per table Maximum fee $189.00 Printer $125.00 Private investigator agency $188.00 Professional counselor $63.00 Professional engineer $250.00 Professional land surveyor $250.00 Psychologist $313.00

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 22 Public accountant $188.00 Public stenographer $38.00 Publisher $313.00 Real estate broker, appraiser, and manager $157.00 Real estate development corporation $344.00 Real estate property manager: One - three units managed $50.50 Four - ten units managed $125.00 Ten + units managed $125.00 Real estate salesperson or associated broker $50.50 Rental service $125.00 Sales representative $50.50 School and educational service (nonvocational) $63.00 School and educational service (vocational) $125.00 Scientific laboratory $250.00 Scrap and waste material service $125.00 Secondhand dealer of precious metals $125.00 Security service $188.00 Self-service laundry or dry cleaner $125.00 Shoe repairman $50.50 Sound truck, per hour $33.00 Tailor and garment service $50.50 Taxicab or bus operator: First vehicle $26.00 Each additional vehicle $26.00 Tourist home, per room $7.00 Trailer park, per space $7.00 Travel agency $125.00 Veterinarian $313.00 Warehouseman $250.00 Wholesale news agency $63.00 All other businesses not listed: One - three employees $50.50 Four - nine employees $95.00 Ten - 50 employees $125.00 51 - 100 employees $313.00

Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Homes Page 23 593 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 594 That Appendix F - Fees and Fines, Chapter 66 - Manufactured Homes and Trailers of the Dover Code be 595 amended by inserting the bold, blue text and deleting the text indicated in red strikeout, as follows: Fees and Fines 596 Chapter 66 - Manufactured Homes and Trailers, Mobile Homes, and Land Lease Communities 597 Sec. 66-2 - Licenses Subsec. (a) - Required fee $45.00 each license A fine of not less than $50.00 $25.00, nor more than $1,000.00 and a penalty fee of Subsec. (b) - Payment; penalties ten percent per month shall accrue on the unpaid balance of the license fee 598 Sec. 66-5 - Duties of Land Lease Community Owners and Operators A fine of not less t han $5 0 .0 0 i n addition to any Subsec. (c)(i) - Failure to perform required duties charges imposed to cover cost of maintenance by the City $75.00 per hour for such work that must be done to render the property in Subsec. 66-5 (c)(ii) - Cost of maintenance by the City compliance with this article, plus a 15% administrative charge 599 ADOPTED: * 600 S:\ORDINANCES\2016\DRAFT\ORDINANCE #2016-16 MANUFACTURED HOUSING\Proposed Ordinance #2016-16 - Manufactured Housing-First Reading.wpd 601 SYNOPSIS 602 The proposed ordinance updates the standards and terminology throughout the Dover Code as they relate 603 to manufactured homes. The proposed ordinance also implements standards for management and 604 maintenance of land lease communities. (SPONSORS: NEIL, SLAVIN, AND COLE) 605 Actions History 606 06/27/2016 - Scheduled for First Reading - City Council 607 06/14/2016 - Introduction - Council Committee of the Whole/Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2016-17 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 2 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Forty Six Million Seven Hundred Seventeen Thousand Four 3 Hundred dollars ($46,717,400) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 4 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 5 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 6 GENERAL FUND 7 CASH RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR 2016-2017 8 2015/16 2016/17 9 REVISED BUDGET 10 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 4,820,400 $ 4,493,900 11 RECEIPTS 12 FINES AND POLICE REVENUE 651,400 763,300 13 INVESTMENT INCOME 140,000 90,000 14 LIBRARY REVENUES 67,000 70,300 15 KENT COUNTY BOOK REIMBURSEMENT 312,600 312,600 16 BUSINESS LICENSES 1,472,000 1,467,000 17 PERMITS AND OTHER FEES 1,436,300 1,662,100 18 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 56,600 56,800 19 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 461,500 525,000 20 PROPERTY TAXES 12,783,800 12,895,100 21 BID REVENUE 49,700 - 22 RECREATION REVENUE 149,000 150,000 23 FRANCHISE FEE 682,300 680,000 24 SANITATION FEES 2,530,000 2,538,300 25 RENT REVENUE - GARRISON FARM 93,900 94,500 26 COURT OF CHANCERY FEES 1,090,400 1,100,000 27 RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 21,976,500 22,405,000 28 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS 29 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS W/WW 1,420,200 1,653,800 30 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS ELECTRIC 3,586,700 3,564,900 31 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 5,006,900 5,218,700 32 GRANTS: 33 POLICE RELATED/EXTRA DUTY 172,700 258,600 34 POLICE PENSION GRANT 500,000 500,000 35 GREEN ENERGY GRANT 98,500 98,500 36 MISC GRANT REVENUE 25,000 25,000 37 VERIZON RESERVE 50,000 - 38 GRANTS SUBTOTAL 846,200 882,100 39 TRANSFERS FROM: 40 TRANSFER TAX 2,090,200 1,672,700 41 MUNICIPAL STREET AID 673,100 673,100 42 CIVIL TRAFFIC PENALTIES 480,000 496,900 43 WATER/WASTEWATER 850,000 875,000 44 ELECTRIC 10,000,000 10,000,000 45 OTHER RESERVES 13,200 - 46 TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL 14,106,500 13,717,700 47 TOTAL REVENUES 41,936,100 42,223,500 48 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE & REVENUE $ 46,756,500 $ 46,717,400 1

FINAL READING 49 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 50 GENERAL FUND - EXPENDITURES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2016-2017 51 2015/16 2016/17 52 DEPARTMENT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 53 CITY CLERK $ 382,800 $ 412,300 54 COUNCIL 113,600 141,100 55 TAX ASSESSOR 239,800 244,000 56 FIRE 735,400 721,700 57 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 1,133,000 1,201,300 58 LIBRARY 1,456,000 1,635,000 59 RECREATION 723,200 750,900 60 LIFE SAFETY 479,800 485,200 61 CODE ENFORCEMENT 412,700 421,100 62 PLANNING 532,800 546,800 63 INSPECTIONS 749,000 697,900 64 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 245,000 - 65 POLICE 15,921,400 16,091,600 66 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 634,200 783,600 67 STREETS 658,500 1,163,500 68 SANITATION 2,151,100 2,032,800 69 CITY MANAGER 909,300 792,400 70 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 625,500 716,300 71 FINANCE 991,400 1,011,100 72 PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION 580,300 680,000 73 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 692,200 607,100 74 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 173,400 207,000 75 PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY 569,300 585,100 76 FLEET MAINTENANCE 760,000 776,300 77 CUSTOMER SERVICE 1,082,000 1,143,800 78 HUMAN RESOURCES 376,700 392,500 79 MAYOR 76,100 74,000 80 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTALS 33,404,500 34,314,400 81 OTHER EXPENSES 82 DEBT SERVICE 669,400 685,300 83 CONTRIBUTION TO DDP 70,000 150,000 84 MISCELLANEOUS GRANT RELATED EXP 25,000 25,000 85 INSURANCE 690,000 700,000 86 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 1,567,700 2,039,700 87 OTHER EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES 51,500 400,700 88 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 10,600 15,000 89 UNCOLLECTIBLES - TRASH AND OTHER 50,000 50,000 90 STREET LIGHTS 797,700 804,000 91 NEW STREET PROPERTIES ACQUISITIONS 240,400 - 92 OTHER EXPENSE SUBTOTAL 4,172,300 4,869,700 93 TRANSFERS 94 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND - PROJECTS 2,625,400 1,859,400 95 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 229,600 - 96 APPROP. TO THE GENERAL EMPLOYEE PENSION FUND 594,300 - 97 APPROP. TO THE POLICE PENSION FUND 676,500 670,000 98 APPROP. POLICE PENSION - STATE GRANT 500,000 500,000 99 TRANSFER TO VERIZON RESERVE 50,000 - 100 TRANSFER TO INVENTORY WRITE-OFFS 10,000 10,000 101 TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL 4,685,800 3,039,400 102 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 42,262,600 42,223,500 103 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 4,493,900 4,493,900 104 TOTALS $ 46,756,500 $ 46,717,400 105 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 106 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 107 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 108 ADOPTED: 2

FINAL READING 109 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 110 GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 111 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 112 113 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 114 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Million Four Hundred Thirty Three Thousand Three Hundred dollars 115 ($2,433,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 116 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 117 and ending June 30, 2017: 118 REVENUES 119 2015/16 2016/17 120 REVISED BUDGET 121 BEGINNING BALANCE - PROJECTS $ 2,926,700 $ 383,900 122 REVENUES 123 INCOME FROM SALE OF ASSETS 120,800 - 124 GRANT RECEIPTS 80,500 105,000 125 INTEREST EARNINGS 5,000 5,000 126 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 2,625,400 1,859,400 127 MISCELLANOUS RECEIPTS 74,700 - 128 TRANSFER FROM PARKLAND RESERVE - 80,000 129 SUBTOTAL PROJECT RECEIPTS 2,906,400 2,049,400 130 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 2,906,400 2,049,400 131 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE AND REVENUES $ 5,833,100 $ 2,433,300 132 EXPENSE SUMMARY 133 2015/16 2016/17 134 EXPENDITURES REVISED BUDGET 135 FIRE $ 445,800 $ 145,700 136 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 185,200 58,200 137 LIFE SAFETY 55,700 29,500 138 POLICE 302,700 299,800 139 RECREATION 73,900 165,000 140 STREETS 3,735,000 1,026,000 141 SANITATION 449,000 261,500 142 CITY MANAGER 24,700 - 143 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT - 27,700 144 FLEET MAINTENANCE 84,500 31,000 145 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTAL 5,356,500 2,044,400 146 TRANSFERS 147 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 92,700 - 148 TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL 92,700 - 149 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,449,200 2,044,400 150 BUDGET BALANCE 383,900 388,900 151 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCE & EXPENDITURES $ 5,833,100 $ 2,433,300 152 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 153 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 154 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 155 ADOPTED: 3

FINAL READING 156 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 157 GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY 158 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 159 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 160 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Forty One Thousand dollars ($741,000) 161 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 162 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 163 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 164 CASH RECEIPTS 165 2015/16 2016/17 166 REVISED BUDGET 167 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 720,300 $ 731,000 168 INTEREST EARNED 10,700 10,000 169 TOTALS $ 731,000 $ 741,000 170 EXPENSE SUMMARY 171 2015/16 2016/17 172 REVISED BUDGET 173 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 731,000 741,000 174 TOTALS $ 731,000 $ 741,000 175 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 176 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 177 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 178 ADOPTED: 4

FINAL READING 179 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 180 GENERAL CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 181 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 182 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 183 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Two Hundred Sixty Six Thousand Three Hundred 184 dollars ($1,266,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 185 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal 186 year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 187 CASH RECEIPTS 188 2015/16 2016/17 189 REVISED BUDGET 190 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 915,100 $ 1,251,300 191 RECEIPTS 192 INTEREST EARNINGS 13,900 15,000 193 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL CAPITAL ASSET FUND 92,700 - 194 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 229,600 - 195 TOTAL RECEIPTS 336,200 15,000 196 TOTALS $ 1,251,300 $ 1,266,300 197 EXPENSE SUMMARY 198 2015/16 2016/17 199 REVISED BUDGET 200 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR $ 1,251,300 $ 1,266,300 201 TOTALS $ 1,251,300 $ 1,266,300 202 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 203 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 204 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 205 ADOPTED: 5

FINAL READING 206 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 207 PARKLAND/RECREATION RESERVE 208 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 209 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 210 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Twenty Seven Thousand Nine Hundred dollars 211 ($327,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 212 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 213 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 214 OPERATING REVENUES 215 2015/16 2016/17 216 REVISED BUDGET 217 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 320,800 $ 324,900 218 INTEREST INCOME 4,100 3,000 219 TOTALS $ 324,900 $ 327,900 220 OPERATING EXPENSES 221 2015/16 2016/17 222 REVISED BUDGET 223 TRANSFER TO GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUND - 80,000 224 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 324,900 247,900 225 TOTALS $ 324,900 $ 327,900 226 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 227 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 228 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 229 ADOPTED: 6

FINAL READING 230 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 231 WATER/WASTEWATER FUND 232 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 233 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 234 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Sixteen Million Six Hundred Ninety Six Thousand Nine Hundred 235 dollars ($16,696,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 236 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 237 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 238 2015/16 2016/17 239 REVISED BUDGET 240 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 1,072,900 $ 566,500 241 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 206,900 663,200 242 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,279,800 1,229,700 243 BASE REVENUE 244 WATER SERVICES 5,366,600 5,800,000 245 WASTEWATER SERVICES 3,823,800 3,800,000 246 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICES 2,997,600 3,000,000 247 GROUNDWATER INFLOW ADJUSTMENT 1,965,600 1,938,000 248 WATER TANK SPACE LEASING 341,900 366,200 249 SEWER IMPACT FEES 222,400 228,000 250 WATER IMPACT FEES 253,400 252,000 251 INTEREST - WATER 5,000 10,000 252 INTEREST - WASTEWATER 5,000 10,000 253 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE 56,200 63,000 254 TOTAL REVENUES 15,037,500 15,467,200 255 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES AND REVENUES $ 16,317,300 $ 16,696,900 7

FINAL READING 256 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 257 WATER/WASTEWATER FUND - EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2016-2017 258 2015/16 2016/17 259 DIRECT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 260 ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ 512,500 $ 516,500 261 WATER DEPARTMENT 650,900 655,400 262 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 840,600 962,400 263 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 1,743,100 1,727,400 264 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL 3,747,100 3,861,700 265 OTHER EXPENSES 266 DEBT SERVICE - WATER 521,100 590,300 267 DEBT SERVICE - WASTEWATER 611,300 636,900 268 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 60,200 192,400 269 OTHER EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES 142,300 21,200 270 KENT COUNTY TREATMENT CHARGE 4,130,000 4,130,000 271 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 1,420,200 1,653,800 272 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 25,000 25,000 273 BOND ISSUE COSTS - 40,000 274 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 6,910,100 7,289,600 275 TRANSFER TO: 276 GENERAL FUND FROM WATER 550,000 500,000 277 GENERAL FUND FROM WASTEWATER 300,000 375,000 278 WATER IMP AND EXT 1,800,000 1,000,000 279 WASTEWATER IMP AND EXT 1,500,000 1,000,000 280 CONTINGENCY RESERVE WATER 32,000 110,000 281 CONTINGENCY RESERVE WASTEWATER - 60,000 282 GENERAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND 248,400 - 283 ELECTRIC IMP AND EXT - 231,200 284 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 4,430,400 3,276,200 285 TOTAL EXPENSES 15,087,600 14,427,500 286 BUDGET BALANCES 287 BUDGET BALANCE WATER 566,500 1,103,100 288 BUDGET BALANCE WASTEWATER 663,200 1,166,300 289 BUDGET BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,229,700 2,269,400 290 TOTAL CURRENT YEAR BALANCES AND EXPENSES $ 16,317,300 $ 16,696,900 291 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 292 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 293 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 294 ADOPTED: 8

FINAL READING 295 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 296 WATER/WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION FUND 297 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 298 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 299 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Million Eight Hundred Thirty Eight Thousand Five Hundred 300 dollars ($7,838,500) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 301 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 302 begining July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 303 CASH RECEIPTS 304 2015/16 2016/17 305 REVISED BUDGET 306 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 4,990,300 $ 1,179,900 307 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 4,551,700 952,600 308 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 9,542,000 2,132,500 309 REVENUES 310 STATE LOAN FUND - WATER - 2,400,000 311 STATE LOAN FUND - WASTEWATER - 884,000 312 TRANS FR OPERATING FUND - WATER 1,800,000 1,000,000 313 TRANS FR OPERATING FUND - WASTEWATER 1,500,000 1,000,000 314 TRANSFER FROM WATER IMPACT FEE - 190,800 315 TRANSFER FROM WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE 165,000 211,200 316 INTEREST INCOME 69,900 20,000 317 GRANT RECEIPTS 20,300 - 318 MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS 61,400 - 319 TOTAL REVENUES 3,616,600 5,706,000 320 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES & REVENUES $ 13,158,600 $ 7,838,500 321 EXPENSE SUMMARY 322 2015/16 2016/17 323 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 324 W/WW ENGINEERING $ - $ 30,400 325 WATER 5,442,600 1,338,800 326 WASTEWATER 5,299,100 2,021,200 327 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 284,400 1,200,000 328 TOTAL EXPENSES 11,026,100 4,590,400 329 BUDGET BALANCE - WATER 1,179,900 2,226,700 330 BUDGET BALANCE - WASTEWATER 952,600 1,021,400 331 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 2,132,500 3,248,100 332 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCES & EXPENSES $ 13,158,600 $ 7,838,500 333 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 334 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 335 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 336 ADOPTED: 9

FINAL READING 337 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 338 WATER/WASTEWATER CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 339 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 340 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 341 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Thirty Five Thousand Eight hundred dollars ($1,035,800) 342 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds 343 for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 344 and ending June 30, 2017: 345 CASH RECEIPTS 346 2015/16 2016/17 347 REVISED BUDGET 348 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 510,700 $ 514,600 349 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 509,500 513,400 350 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,020,200 1,028,000 351 RECEIPTS 352 INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 3,900 3,900 353 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 3,900 3,900 354 TOTAL RECEIPTS 7,800 7,800 355 TOTALS $ 1,028,000 $ 1,035,800 356 EXPENSE SUMMARY 357 2015/16 2016/17 358 REVISED BUDGET 359 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 514,600 $ 518,500 360 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 513,400 517,300 361 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,028,000 1,035,800 362 TOTALS $ 1,028,000 $ 1,035,800 363 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 364 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 365 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 366 ADOPTED: 10

FINAL READING 367 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 368 WATER/WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 369 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 370 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 371 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Million Thirty Seven Thousand dollars ($2,037,000) 372 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated fromcurrent revenues and other 373 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning 374 July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 375 CASH RECEIPTS 376 2015/16 2016/17 377 REVISED BUDGET 378 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 427,500 $ 430,700 379 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 1,742,700 1,590,900 380 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 2,170,200 2,021,600 381 RECEIPTS 382 INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 3,200 3,300 383 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 13,200 12,100 384 TOTAL RECEIPTS 16,400 15,400 385 TOTALS $ 2,186,600 $ 2,037,000 386 EXPENSE SUMMARY 387 2015/16 2016/17 388 REVISED BUDGET 389 TRANSFER TO I & E FUND FROM WATER IMPACT FEES $ - $ 190,800 390 TRANSFER TO I & E FUND FROM WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES 165,000 211,200 391 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER 430,700 243,200 392 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 1,590,900 1,391,800 393 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 2,021,600 1,635,000 394 TOTALS $ 2,186,600 $ 2,037,000 395 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 396 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 397 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 398 ADOPTED: 11

FINAL READING 399 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 400 WATER/WASTEWATER CONTINGENCY RESERVE 401 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 402 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 403 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Hundred One Thousand Eight Hundred dollars 404 ($501,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 405 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 406 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 407 CASH RECEIPTS 408 2015/16 2016/17 409 REVISED BUDGET 410 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 105,200 $ 138,000 411 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 190,200 191,600 412 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 295,400 329,600 413 RECEIPTS 414 INTEREST EARNINGS 2,200 2,500 415 TRANSFER FROM OPERATING ACCOUNT TO WATER 32,000 110,000 416 TRANSFER FROM OPERATING ACCOUNT TO WASTEWATER - 60,000 417 TOTAL RECEIPTS 34,200 172,500 418 TOTALS $ 329,600 $ 502,100 419 BUDGET SUMMARY 420 2015/16 2016/17 421 REVISED BUDGET 422 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER 138,000 249,000 423 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 191,600 253,100 424 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 329,600 502,100 425 TOTAL EXPENSES AND CURRENT YEAR BALANCES $ 329,600 $ 502,100 426 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 427 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 428 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 429 ADOPTED: 12

FINAL READING 430 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 431 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND 432 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 433 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 434 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ninety Two Million Seven Hundred Thirty Thousand Eight 435 hundred dollars ($92,730,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 436 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 437 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 438 2015/16 2016/17 439 REVISED BUDGET 440 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 8,337,500 $ 13,302,200 441 BASE REVENUE 442 DIRECT SALES TO CUSTOMER 78,493,800 77,193,200 443 UTILITY TAX 1,309,600 1,287,900 444 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 911,400 548,600 445 RENT REVENUE 202,600 223,000 446 GREEN ENERGY 128,000 128,000 447 INTEREST EARNINGS 35,000 47,900 448 TRANSFER FROM RATE STABILIZATION 750,000 - 449 TOTAL REVENUES 81,830,400 79,428,600 450 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE & REVENUES 90,167,900 92,730,800 13

FINAL READING 451 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 452 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2016-2017 453 2015/16 2016/17 454 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 455 POWER SUPPLY $ 23,402,600 $ 16,557,600 456 SOLAR ENERGY 2,313,900 2,313,900 457 SOLAR RENEWAL ENERGY CREDITS 363,400 363,400 458 POWER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 996,000 996,000 459 REC'S (Renewable Energy Credits) 673,400 673,400 460 RGGI (Regional Greenhouse Gas Init.) 175,000 175,000 461 PJM CHARGES - ENERGY 7,966,100 12,357,900 462 PJM CHARGES - TRANSMISSION & FEES 7,932,500 7,603,800 463 CAPACITY CHARGES 10,225,100 10,160,600 464 SUB-TOTAL POWER SUPPLY 54,048,000 51,201,600 465 PLANT OPERATIONS 6,382,900 6,215,700 466 GENERATIONS FUELS 1,167,300 256,900 467 PJM SPOT MARKET ENERGY (1,708,300) (804,900) 468 PJM CREDITS (360,000) (360,000) 469 CAPACITY CREDITS (10,472,100) (7,355,100) 470 GENERATION SUBTOTAL (4,990,200) (2,047,400) 471 POWER SUPPLY & GENERATION SUBTOTAL 49,057,800 49,154,200 472 DIRECT EXPENDITURES 473 TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION 3,437,300 3,605,700 474 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 1,120,900 1,247,900 475 ADMINISTRATION 834,300 929,700 476 METER READING 363,200 378,600 477 SYSTEMS OPERATIONS 601,500 651,700 478 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTALS 6,357,200 6,813,600 479 OTHER EXPENSES: 480 UTILITY TAX 1,309,600 1,287,900 481 ALLOW FOR UNCOLLECTIBLES 200,000 250,000 482 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 57,700 600,000 483 OTHER EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES 353,400 58,900 484 GREEN ENERGY PAYMENT TO DEMEC 128,000 128,000 485 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 3,586,700 3,564,900 486 INTEREST ON DEPOSITS 20,500 21,000 487 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 259,300 275,000 488 DEBT SERVICE 1,617,700 1,618,000 489 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 7,532,900 7,803,700 490 TRANSFER TO: 491 IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION 3,500,000 2,500,000 492 GENERAL FUND 10,000,000 10,000,000 493 TRANSFER TO FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE - 750,000 494 TRANSFER TO DEPRECIATION RESERVE - 750,000 495 TRANSFER INSURANCE RESERVE 10,000 - 496 TRANSFER CONTINGENCY RESERVE 13,000 - 497 TRANSFER RATE STABILIZATION RESERVE 394,800 1,250,000 498 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 13,917,800 15,250,000 499 TOTAL EXPENSES 76,865,700 79,021,500 500 BUDGET BALANCE - WORKING CAPITAL 13,302,200 13,709,300 501 TOTALS $ 90,167,900 $ 92,730,800 502 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 503 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 504 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 505 ADOPTED: 14

FINAL READING 506 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 507 ELECTRIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION FUND 508 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 509 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 510 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Nine Million Two Hundred Sixteen Thousand Seven Hundred 511 dollars ($9,216,700) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 512 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 513 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 514 REVENUES 515 2015/16 2016/17 516 REVISED BUDGET 517 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 7,095,300 $ 5,540,500 518 REVENUES 519 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC 3,500,000 2,500,000 520 TRANSFER FROM WATER/WASTEWATER - 231,200 521 TRANSFER FROM 2010 BOND RESERVE 2,108,000 - 522 GENERAL SERVICE BILLING 1,900,000 900,000 523 DEVELOPMENT GRANTS 15,000 5,000 524 INTEREST EARNINGS 57,900 40,000 525 TOTAL REVENUES 7,580,900 3,676,200 526 TOTALS $ 14,676,200 $ 9,216,700 527 EXPENSE SUMMARY 528 2015/16 2016/17 529 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 530 ELECTRIC GENERATION $ 2,299,800 $ 1,842,800 531 TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION 3,524,900 1,975,000 532 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 3,288,000 910,700 533 METER READING 23,000 41,800 534 ERP SYSTEM - 1,000,000 535 TOTAL EXPENSES 9,135,700 5,770,300 536 BUDGET BALANCE 5,540,500 3,446,400 537 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCE & EXPENSES $ 14,676,200 $ 9,216,700 538 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 539 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 540 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 541 ADOPTED: 15

FINAL READING 542 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 543 ELECTRIC UTILITY CONTINGENCY RESERVE 544 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 545 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 546 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Forty Eight Thousand Three Hundred dollars 547 ($848,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 548 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 549 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 550 CASH RECEIPTS 551 2015/16 2016/17 552 REVISED BUDGET 553 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 822,700 $ 841,900 554 RECEIPTS 555 INTEREST EARNINGS 6,200 6,400 556 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC FUND 13,000 - 557 TOTAL RECEIPTS 19,200 6,400 558 TOTALS $ 841,900 $ 848,300 559 EXPENSE SUMMARY 560 2015/16 2016/17 561 REVISED BUDGET 562 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 841,900 848,300 563 TOTALS $ 841,900 $ 848,300 564 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 565 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 566 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 567 ADOPTED: 16

FINAL READING 568 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 569 ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPRECIATION RESERVE 570 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2016-2017 571 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 572 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ten Million Nine Hundred Ten Thousand Two Hundred 573 dollars ($10,910,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 574 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 575 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 576 CASH RECEIPTS 577 2015/16 2016/17 578 REVISED BUDGET 579 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 9,957,900 $ 10,083,600 580 INTEREST EARNINGS 125,700 76,600 581 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND - 750,000 582 TOTALS $ 10,083,600 $ 10,910,200 583 BUDGET SUMMARY 584 2015/16 2016/17 585 REVISED BUDGET 586 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 10,083,600 10,910,200 587 TOTALS $ 10,083,600 $ 10,910,200 588 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 589 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 590 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 591 ADOPTED: 17

FINAL READING 592 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 593 ELECTRIC UTILITY FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE 594 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2016-2017 595 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 596 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ten Million Nine Hundred Sixty One Thousand Seven Hundred 597 dollars ($10,961,700) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 598 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 599 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 600 CASH RECEIPTS 601 2015/16 2016/17 602 REVISED BUDGET 603 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 10,107,900 $ 10,134,700 604 INTEREST EARNINGS 76,800 77,000 605 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND - 750,000 606 TOTALS $ 10,184,700 $ 10,961,700 607 BUDGET SUMMARY 608 2015/16 2016/17 609 REVISED BUDGET 610 TRANSFER TO FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE 50,000 - 611 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 10,134,700 10,961,700 612 TOTALS $ 10,184,700 $ 10,961,700 613 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 614 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 615 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 616 ADOPTED: 18

FINAL READING 617 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 618 ELECTRIC UTILITY INSURANCE STABLIZATION RESERVE 619 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2016-2017 620 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 621 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Sixty Two Thousand dollars ($762,000) 622 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 623 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 624 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 625 CASH RECEIPTS 626 2015/16 2016/17 627 REVISED BUDGET 628 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 740,600 $ 756,300 629 INTEREST EARNINGS 5,700 5,700 630 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC FUND 10,000 - 631 TOTALS $ 756,300 $ 762,000 632 BUDGET SUMMARY 633 2015/16 2016/17 634 REVISED BUDGET 635 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 756,300 762,000 636 TOTALS $ 756,300 $ 762,000 637 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 638 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 639 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 640 ADOPTED: 19

FINAL READING 641 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 642 ELECTRIC UTILITY RATE STABLIZATION RESERVE 643 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2016-2017 644 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 645 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Million Five Hundred Eleven Thousand Nine 646 Hundred dollars ($8,511,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 647 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 648 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 649 CASH RECEIPTS 650 2015/16 2016/17 651 REVISED BUDGET 652 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 7,505,400 $ 7,207,100 653 INTEREST EARNINGS 56,900 54,800 654 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND 394,800 1,250,000 655 TOTALS $ 7,957,100 $ 8,511,900 656 BUDGET SUMMARY 657 2015/16 2016/17 658 REVISED BUDGET 659 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC FUND $ 750,000 $ - 660 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 7,207,100 8,511,900 661 TOTALS $ 7,957,100 $ 8,511,900 662 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 663 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 664 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 665 ADOPTED: 20

FINAL READING 666 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 667 MUNICIPAL STREET AID FUND 668 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 669 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 670 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Six Hundred Seventy Three Thousand Two Hundred 671 dollars ($673,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 672 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 673 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 674 CASH RECEIPTS 675 2015/16 2016/17 676 REVISED BUDGET 677 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 100 $ 100 678 STATE GRANT 673,100 673,100 679 TOTALS 673,200 673,200 680 BUDGET SUMMARY 681 2015/16 2016/17 682 REVISED BUDGET 683 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND 673,100 673,100 684 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 100 100 685 TOTALS $ 673,200 $ 673,200 686 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 687 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 688 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 689 ADOPTED: 21

FINAL READING 690 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 691 ELECTRONIC RED LIGHT SAFETY PROGRAM 692 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 693 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 694 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Hundred Ninety Seven Thousand dollars ($497,000) 695 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 696 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning 697 July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 698 CASH RECEIPTS 699 2015/16 2016/17 700 REVISED BUDGET 701 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 100 $ 100 702 STATE GRANT 480,000 496,900 703 TOTALS 480,100 497,000 704 BUDGET SUMMARY 705 2015/16 2016/17 706 REVISED BUDGET 707 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND 480,000 496,900 708 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 100 100 709 TOTALS $ 480,100 $ 497,000 710 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 711 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 712 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 713 ADOPTED: 22

FINAL READING 714 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 715 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND 716 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 717 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 718 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Million One Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Seven Hundred 719 dollars ($2,136,700) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 720 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 721 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 722 OPERATING REVENUES 723 2015/16 2016/17 724 REVISED BUDGET 725 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 1,248,200 $ 1,256,300 726 INTEREST INCOME 20,700 25,000 727 PREMIUM FROM CITY 620,000 855,400 728 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 9,400 - 729 TOTALS $ 1,898,300 $ 2,136,700 730 OPERATING EXPENSES 731 2015/16 2016/17 732 REVISED BUDGET 733 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES - CLAIMS $ 475,000 $ 475,000 734 INSURANCE 103,900 105,500 735 STATE OF DEL - SELF INSURANCE TAX 38,100 39,000 736 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,000 25,000 737 TOTAL EXPENSES 642,000 644,500 738 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 1,256,300 1,492,200 739 TOTALS $ 1,898,300 $ 2,136,700 740 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 741 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 742 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 743 ADOPTED: 23

FINAL READING 744 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 745 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND 746 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 747 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 748 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Hundred Ninety Two Thousand One Hundred dollars 749 ($592,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 750 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 751 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 752 OPERATING REVENUES 753 2015/16 2016/17 754 REVISED BUDGET 755 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 57,800 $ 92,100 756 GRANTS REVENUE 839,300 500,000 757 INTEREST INCOME 500 - 758 TOTALS $ 897,600 $ 592,100 759 OPERATING EXPENSES 760 2015/16 2016/17 761 REVISED BUDGET 762 PROGRAM EXP. GRANT RELATED $ 805,500 $ 500,000 763 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 92,100 92,100 764 TOTALS $ 897,600 $ 592,100 765 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 766 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 767 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 768 ADOPTED: 24

FINAL READING 769 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 770 LIBRARY GRANT FUND 771 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 772 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 773 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Three Hundred dollars 774 ($325,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 775 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 776 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 777 OPERATING REVENUES 778 2015/16 2016/17 779 REVISED BUDGET 780 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 30,600 $ 17,300 781 STATE GRANT 305,500 305,500 782 FEDERAL GRANT 2,500 2,500 783 TOTALS $ 338,600 $ 325,300 784 OPERATING EXPENSES 785 2015/16 2016/17 786 REVISED BUDGET 787 STATE GRANTS 788 FURNITURE/FIXTURES $ 7,000 $ 10,500 789 OFFICE SUPPLIES 30,800 30,800 790 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 12,500 12,500 791 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 27,500 27,500 792 BOOKS 146,600 150,600 793 AUDIO VISUAL SUPPLIES 77,200 77,200 794 POSTAGE 100 100 795 TRAINING/CONF/FOOD/TRAV 8,800 5,300 796 OFF EQP/REPAIRS & MAINT 6,300 6,300 797 OTHER EQUIP - LEASE 2,000 2,000 798 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES STATE GRANTS 318,800 322,800 799 FEDERAL GRANTS 800 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 2,500 2,500 801 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES FEDERAL GRANTS 2,500 2,500 802 GRAND TOTAL EXPENSES 321,300 325,300 803 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 17,300 - 804 TOTALS $ 338,600 $ 325,300 805 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 806 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 807 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 808 ADOPTED: 25

FINAL READING 809 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 810 POLICE GRANTS FUND 811 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 812 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 813 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Six Hundred Fourteen Thousand Three Hundred dollars 814 ($614,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 815 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 816 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 817 OPERATING REVENUES 818 2015/16 2016/17 819 REVISED BUDGET 820 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 154,900 $ 295,300 821 STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS RECEIVED 1,111,900 319,000 822 TOTALS 1,266,800 614,300 823 OPERATING EXPENSES 824 2015/16 2016/17 825 REVISED BUDGET 826 EXPENDITURES 827 PERSONNEL EXPENDITURES 828 CADET PROGRAM SALARIES 71,400 71,400 829 CADET PROGRAM FICA 5,400 5,500 830 CADET PROGRAM W/COMP 3,500 4,200 831 MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 832 POLICE EQUIPT & PROG SUPP 384,600 284,000 833 TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT 20,000 - 834 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 835 CELL PHONE CHARGES 15,000 16,000 836 TRAINING 72,600 17,000 837 AUDIT FEES 1,000 1,000 838 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 299,400 5,000 839 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 872,900 404,100 840 OTHER FINANCING USES 841 OPERATING TRANSFERS-OUT 172,700 82,000 842 TOTAL FINANCING USES 172,700 82,000 843 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 221,200 128,200 844 TOTALS $ 1,266,800 $ 614,300 845 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. 846 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 847 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 848 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 849 ADOPTED: 26

FINAL READING 850 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 851 CDBG GRANT FUND 852 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 853 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 854 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Thirty Eight Thousand Six Hundred dollars 855 ($238,600) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 856 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 857 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 858 OPERATING REVENUES 859 2015/16 2016/17 860 REVISED BUDGET 861 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 2,100 $ 2,100 862 CDBG GRANTS RECEIVED 272,800 236,500 863 TOTALS 274,900 238,600 864 OPERATING EXPENSES 865 2015/16 2016/17 866 REVISED BUDGET 867 EXPENDITURES 868 PRIOR YEAR CLOSING COST/DOWN PAYMENT PROGRAM 900 - 869 PRIOR YEAR NCALL RESEARCH INC. 6,500 - 870 CURRENT YEAR CLOSING COST/DOWN PAYMENT PROGRAM 60,000 50,000 871 CURRENT YEAR CONNECTION SUPP PROGRAM 7,400 7,200 872 CURRENT YEAR DOVER INTERFAITH MINISTRY 27,000 22,000 873 CURRENT YEAR MHDC EMERGENCY HOME REPAIR 35,300 25,000 874 CURRENT YEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 40,000 30,000 875 CURRENT YEAR MHDC HOMEOWNER REHAB. 52,900 55,000 876 CURRENT YEAR PEOPLES PLACE 6,800 - 877 CURRENT YEAR SALARIES 36,000 47,300 878 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 272,800 236,500 879 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 2,100 2,100 880 TOTALS $ 274,900 $ 238,600 881 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 882 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 883 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 884 ADOPTED: 27

FINAL READING 885 2016-2017 BUDGET ORDINANCES 886 SUBSTANCE ABUSE GRANTS FUND 887 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2016-2017 888 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 889 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Hundred Twenty One Thousand Three Hundred dollars 890 ($121,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 891 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 892 beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017: 893 OPERATING REVENUES 894 2015/16 2016/17 895 REVISED BUDGET 896 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 98,200 $ 60,300 897 STATE GRANTS RECEIVED 28,000 28,000 898 RECREATION REVENUE 50,000 33,000 899 TOTALS 176,200 121,300 900 OPERATING EXPENSES 901 2015/16 2016/17 902 REVISED BUDGET 903 EXPENDITURES 904 TEMPORARY HELP/BENEFITS 60,200 60,200 905 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 55,700 55,000 906 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 115,900 115,200 907 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 60,300 6,100 908 TOTALS $ 176,200 $ 121,300 909 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. 910 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 911 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 912 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 913 ADOPTED: 28