paperless packet

CITY OF DOVER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 9:00 AM City Hall Council Chambers 15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, Delaware ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES of December 21, 2016 Meeting NEW BUSINESS Applicant #V-17-01 118 Galaxy Drive. Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless has requested a variance from the requirements of Article 4 § 4.16 of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to maximum permitted building height to allow construction of a 158 foot telecommunications monopole and associated facilities. Subject property is zoned IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone- Planned Industrial Park) and is subject to the AEOZ (Airport Environs Overlay Zone). The Tax Parcel is ED-05-087.00-01-07.13-000. The owner of record is Independent Newspapers Inc. Variance #V-15-13 was approved by the Board of Adjustment at its meeting of September 16, 2015. The variance expired because construction did not commence. Applicant #V-17-02 341 Saulsbury Road. Whatcoat United Methodist Church has requested a variance from the requirements of Article 5 § 4.7 of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the maximum permitted sign area for a monument sign located on an Urban Minor Arterial street in order to allow construction of a 24 square foot monument sign. Subject property is zoned RG-1 (General Residence Zone) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The Tax Parcel is ED-05-067.19-02-10.00-000. The owner of record is Whatcoat Methodist Church. ADJOURN 29 Del.C. § 10004(e)(2) THE AGENDA ITEMS MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.

CITY OF DOVER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES December 21, 2016 A Regular Meeting of the City of Dover Board of Adjustment was held on Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 9:03 A.M. with Vice Chairman Ericson presiding. Members present were Vice Chairman Ericson, Mr. Hufnal, Mr. Keller and Mr. Senato. Mr. Sheth was absent. Staff members present were Mrs. Townshend, Mrs. Purnell, Mr. Diaz, and City Solicitor Mr. William Pepper. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mr. Hufnal moved to approve the agenda as submitted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Senato and unanimously carried 4-0. Mr. Sheth was absent. APPROVAL OF THE REGULAR BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 16, 2016 Mr. Keller moved to approve the meeting minutes of November 16, 2016 with the necessary corrections, seconded by Mr. Hufnal and unanimously carried 4-0. Mr. Sheth was absent. OPENING REMARKS CONCERNING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Mrs. Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development stated that the meeting today will be conducted in accordance with the agenda. There is one (1) item (new application) on the agenda under New Business. The application file will be read, and the floor will be opened for questions of the applicant by the Board and for public testimony. If the Board needs to consult the City Solicitor, they will recess to discuss legal matters. If the applicant must leave, they can contact the Planning Office at 736-7196 to learn of the Board’s decision. A formal notice of the decision will be mailed to the applicants. Approved variances expire after one year if the approved project has not commenced. All public notice for the new application on this agenda was completed in accordance with code requirements. The meeting agenda was posted in accordance with Freedom of Information Act requirements. NEW BUSINESS Applicant #V-16-16 74 Laurel Drive. Karen Hettinger and Mark J. Larlham have applied to the Board of Adjustment for a variance from the requirements of Article 5 § 11.211 (c) of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to new residential construction within the flood hazard area. They have specifically requested to build to the six (6) foot contour. Subject property is zoned R-10 (One Family Residence Zone). The Tax Parcel is ED-05-077.14-01-32.00-000. The owners of record are Thomas J. Bugbee and Sherrill L. Brekke. Variance #V-15-07 was approved by the Board of Adjustment at its meeting of April 15, 2015. The variance expired because construction did not commence. Exhibits for the Record: Staff report and plans previously submitted by the applicant. Legal

CITY OF DOVER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DECEMBER 21, 2016 Notice was published in the DSN-on December11, 2016. The public was notified in accordance with regulations. Vice Chairman Ericson questioned if there was any member present who had a conflict of interest and there was none. Representative: Mr. Thomas Bugbee, Owner. Mr. Thomas Bugbee was sworn in by Mr. Pepper. Mr. Bugbee testified that he is the owner of the property. On April 15, 2015 the Board gave him permission to go to the 6-foot contour line on the property so that he and his wife could build. Since that time things have changed in their lives. They decided that they could not build on the property and would put the property back up for sale. They sold their house and had to downsize to a smaller lot and home. Things did not work out for them so the property is back up for sale and the folks who are wanting to buy the property are needing to go back to the 6-foot contour line so that they can place the home on the property as they asked back on April 15, 2015. Responding to Mr. Keller’s question clarifying that the property had not yet transferred, Mr. Bugbee replied correct, he stills owns the property. Mr. Keller commented that the report indicates that Mr. Larlham and Ms. Hettinger are the applicants and that Mr. Bugbee was in concert with their application to bring about the variance. Mr. Bugbee replied yes. Responding to Mr. Hufnal’s question whether the home that the applicants plan to put on the lot is in the same footprint as what is in the diagram in the exhibit, Mr. Bugbee replied that the applicant has a different footprint than what they were going to use. Ms. Karen E. Hettinger was sworn in by Mr. Pepper. Ms. Hettinger testified that she assumed that Mark J. Larlham and I are considered applicants because they are not the owners. They have entered into a real estate agreement to purchase 74 Laurel Drive property. Exhibit C is their proposed site plan and they used Scott Engineering as well. The footprint of the house although different from Mr. Bugbee still falls within the 6-foot contour line as the Board had previously approved. Responding to Mr. Hufnal’s particular interest whether the house fell within the same footprint line of the floodplain, Ms. Hettinger replied yes. She also used the same engineer as Mr. Bugbee. Although, the footprint looks a little different than Mr. Bugbee plan it stills fall within the 6-foot contour line. Responding to Mr. Senato’s question whether the perimeter is the same as Mr. Bugbee and there is not increase or decrease in the design or size of the house or where it is going to meet with the 6-foot contour line and floodplain, Ms. Hettinger replied that although the house may be a different 2

CITY OF DOVER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DECEMBER 21, 2016 style as you can compare the footprint of what Mr. Bugbee submitted and what they submitted. Their plan is Exhibit C and it is in accordance with the previously approved variance. Responding to Mr. Senato’s question whether the perimeter of Ms. Hettinger home meets the perimeter that he sees in the original plan and that there was no change, Ms. Hettinger replied yes, the 6-foot contour line and there is no change. Responding to Mr. Hufnal’s question if they were planning to build soon and why were they requesting a variance now, whether it was necessary to get the mortgage or something the applicant is getting ready to build, Ms. Hettinger replied that the plan is to purchase the property, and of course they do not want to purchase the property if the Board is not going to approve, and then be holding a property that they cannot build upon. Responding to Mr. Hufnal’s question whether they need the approval to go to settlement, Ms. Hettinger replied correct. Vice Chairman Ericson opened the public hearing. Mr. John W. Warren was sworn in by Mr. Pepper. Mr. Warren of 82 Laurel Drive testified that he owned a vacant lot next door to the lot in question and he was present to speak out in favor of the variance. He thinks it will enhance the appearance of the neighborhood. Mr. Keller stated that he recalls that Mr. Warren spoke rather highly of the property and upkeep and his contribution of the surrounding area. Mr. Warren stated that he thinks it was in April 2016 that he came before the Board to get approval to put an extension on his shed. He thanked the Board for their approval. The project is complete and it gave him a lot more storage. He appreciates the approval. Vice Chairman Ericson closed the public hearing after seeing no one else wishing to speak. Vice Chairman Ericson questioned if there was any additional correspondence for the record. There was none. He was pleased to hear that the request will assist hopefully in the near future the sale and ultimate construction of the dwelling on this property as the Board have in fact seen it before in relation to the historical nature of the variance request for the property and in support of Staff’s report the testimony given today and the comments made. Mr. Keller moved to approve application V-16-16 to allow for the building to be constructed within the flood hazard area, the 100-year floodplain to the 6-foot contour line for reasons stated and supported by the Staff Report. The motion was seconded by Mr. Senato and was unanimously carried 4-0. Mr. Sheth was absent. 3

CITY OF DOVER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DECEMBER 21, 2016 Mr. Keller moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mr. Senato and unanimously carried 4-0. Mr. Sheth was absent. Meeting adjourned at 9:23 A.M. Sincerely, Maretta Savage-Purnell Secretary 4

City of Dover Board of Adjustment January 18, 2017 V-17-01 Location: 118 Galaxy Dr Applicant: Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless Owner: Independent Newspapers Inc Tax Parcel: ED-05-087.00-01-07.13-000 Application Date: December 14, 2016 Present Zoning: IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone- Planned Industrial Park) AEOZ (Airport Environs Overlay Zone- Noise Area A) Present Use: Vacant/Undeveloped Proposed Use: Telecommunications monopole and associated facilities Reviewed By: Bill Cook, Planner I Variance Type: Area Variance Variance Requested: Permit a 115 foot increase in the maximum height permitted to allow construction of a telecommunications monopole 150 feet in height. Note: The agenda and public notice were released referencing a requested 158 foot height. The correct height requested for the proposed monopole is 150 feet.

V-17-01 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless at 118 Galaxy Dr Board of Adjustment Report Page 2 of 8 Project Description The applicant is requesting an area variance from the requirements of Article 4 § 4.16 of the Zoning Ordinance Zoning Bulk and Parking Regulations pertaining to the maximum permitted building height in the IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone- Planned Industrial Park). Specifically they are requesting a variance to exceed the maximum height requirement by 115 feet in order to allow construction of a 150 foot telecommunications tower and associated facilities at the selected location on the site. Previous Variance Variance V-15-13 was approved by the Board of Adjustment at its meeting of September 16, 2015. The variance expired after one year because construction did not commence. The Notice of Decision is attached (Exhibit A). Adjacent Zoning and Land Use The monopole and compound are planned to be located in the northeast corner of the 6.71 acre site located east of Starlifter Avenue with frontage on Galaxy Drive to the north and Horsepond Road to the south and addressed as 118 Galaxy Drive. The subject parcel presently is undeveloped. Immediate surrounding properties are also zoned IPM (Manufacturing Zone-Planned Industrial Park) and consist of commercial and industrial uses. There is an R-8 (One Family Residential) zoned lot to the southwest of the site and across Horsepond Road. A Zoning Map exhibit (Exhibit B) prepared by staff is found in the Appendix of this Report showing the subject property location and surrounding zoning.

V-17-01 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless at 118 Galaxy Dr Board of Adjustment Report Page 3 of 8 Code Citations Bulk and parking regulations, Article 4 § 4.16 for IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone- Planned Industrial Park) are as follows: For All Permitted Uses: IPM (Planned Industrial Park) Minimum Required: REQUIRED REQUESTED 2½ acres average; 2½ acres average; Lot area 60,000 sq. ft. minimum 60,000 sq. ft. minimum Lot width (ft.) 150 150 Lot depth (ft.) 250 250 Front yard (ft.) 60 60 Side yard (ft.) 40 40 Rear yard (ft.) 40 40 Side or rear yard which adjoins a 100 100 residential zone (ft.) Off-street parking space: Per 800 sq. ft. of floor area 1 1 Per employee, per largest working shift (if greater than 1½ 1½ the requirement under the floor area calculation) Maximum Permitted: Building height Stories 2 2 Feet 35 150 Floor area ratio 0.5 0.5 Applicant’s Proposed Project The applicant has submitted nine (9) pages illustrating the proposed plans for the site, found in Exhibit C attached. References are made to the sheet numbers printed on the right side of the pages. The overall site plan, shown on Sheet Z-1 identifies the location of the proposed tower and compound and the relationship to the subject property, surrounding properties, and adjacent rights of way. Sheet Z-2 shows a more detailed plan of the compound layout including equipment location, surfaces and fencing. An elevation view of the compound and monopole is on Sheet Z-3.

V-17-01 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless at 118 Galaxy Dr Board of Adjustment Report Page 4 of 8 Access to the compound is planned via a driveway from Galaxy Drive. Any Site Development Plan will be subject to procedures specified in Zoning Ordinance Article 10 §2. Please Note: References in Exhibit C on sheets Z-1, Z-2, and Z-3 to a height of 158 feet to the top of the lightening rod should be corrected to 150 feet at the top of the lightening rod. The variance request is for a total height of 150 feet, which is the same as the request granted by variance V-15-13. See V-15-13 Notice of Decision (Exhibit A) attached. Exceptional Practical Difficulties Tests Zoning Ordinance Article 9 §2 dictates the specific powers and duties of the Board of Adjustment with regard to granting variances. Specifically the Board must determine: 2.1 Variance – The board shall have the authority to authorize variances from provisions of the Zoning Ordinance that are not contrary to public interest where the board determines that a literal interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance would result in undue hardship or exceptional practical difficulties to the applicant. In granting variances, the board shall determine that the spirit of the Zoning Ordinance is observed and substantial justice is done. 2.11 Area Variance. A variance shall be considered an area variance if it relates to bulk standards, signage regulations, and other provisions of the Zoning Ordinance that address lot layout, buffers, and dimensions. In considering a request for an area variance, the board shall evaluate the following criteria and document them in their findings of fact: (a) the nature of the zone in which the property lies; (b) the character of the immediate vicinity and the contained uses therein; (c) whether, if the restriction upon the applicant’s property were removed, such removal would seriously affect neighboring properties and uses; and (d) whether, if the restriction is not removed, the restriction would create unnecessary hardship or exceptional practical difficulty for the owner in his efforts to make normal improvements in the character of that use of the property that is a permitted use under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Review of Application As part of the application, the applicant was asked to summarize how the requested variance relates to the criteria. 1. The nature of the zone in which the property lies. Applicant Responses: “The subject property is typical of other properties in the IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone- Planned Industrial Park) Zoning District. A portion of the lot contains environmental constraints, such as wetlands, that limit development.” Staff Response: The lot is larger than immediately surrounding lots zoned IPM, however a portion of the subject lot has environmentally protected areas that preclude development.

V-17-01 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless at 118 Galaxy Dr Board of Adjustment Report Page 5 of 8 2. The character of the immediate vicinity and the contained uses therein. Applicant Responses: “The subject property is unimproved, and includes wooded areas and wetlands. The subject property is located in an industrial park.” Staff Response: The area of wetlands noted is found in the northwestern corner of the property south of Galaxy Drive (Exhibit D). Approximately the same area is also wooded. There are single story commercial buildings on surrounding parcels as well as undeveloped parcels in the industrial park subdivision known as Kent County AeroPark. Private communications antennae and towers such as that which the applicant has proposed, as well as public infrastructure, are permitted uses and are found with the IPM zone throughout the city. The property is also within the AEOZ (Airport Environs Overlay Zone-Noise Zone Area A). Communications facilities are a permitted use within the applicable sub-area of the AEOZ zone. This zone poses no additional restrictions related to height. Regulations related to noise attenuation do not apply to this project as it is not inhabited. 3. Whether, if the restriction upon the applicant’s property were removed, such removal would seriously affect neighboring properties and uses. Applicant Responses: “The construction of a 158' [sic] monopole would not adversely affect neighboring properties and users, because the subject property is within an industrial park in the Planned Industrial Park Zoning District. The proposed monopole will benefit neighboring properties and users, by improving telecommunications service.” Staff Response: Staff does not believe the granting of a variance would adversely impact neighboring properties. The proposed location is distant from the primary population centers and main thoroughfares of the city. The use is in keeping with the permitted uses in the zone and the types of uses found in surrounding properties. 4. Whether, if the restriction is not removed, the restriction would create unnecessary hardship or exceptional practical difficulty for the owner in his efforts to make normal improvements in the character of that use of the property that is a permitted use under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicant Responses:

V-17-01 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless at 118 Galaxy Dr Board of Adjustment Report Page 6 of 8 “The imposition of a 35' height restriction would result in exceptional practical difficulty to Verizon Wireless. Verizon would not be able to satisfy its service objectives and fill significant gaps in coverage and/or capacity if unable to construct a 158' [sic] telecommunications monopole at the subject property. A 35' tall monopole would not provide adequate coverage or even have the ability to communicate with the rest of the Applicant's telecommunications network. Telecommunications uses are permitted as utility uses in the Planned Industrial Park Zoning District. The existing environmental constraints on the property pose exceptional practical difficulties related to improving the property or finding tenants. The location of the designated wetlands likely poses challenges related to building and utility siting therefore denial of the variance would further limit the ability of the owner to make improvements or secure tenants.” Staff Response: Staff cannot comment on the issue of service capacity, but notes that the proposed site is on the east side of town, and near uses, jobs and residences associated with Dover AFB. The proposed site is also near the important Route 1 transportation route as well as Route 13. From the perspective of the lessee, the denial of a variance may create degradation in service for Verizon Wireless customers in the area, which could be an exceptional practical difficulty if the company were unable to maintain adequate service in the area to meet demand. From the perspective of the property owner, staff believes that the existing environmental constraints on the property pose exceptional practical difficulties related to improving the property or finding tenants. The location of the designated wetlands likely poses challenges related to building and utility siting therefore denial of the variance would further limit the ability of the owner to make improvements or secure tenants. Variance Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the area variance for reasons as follows:  With regard to previously approved and subsequently expired variance V-15-13, the facts, site conditions, and proposed construction are unchanged.  The placement of a monopole and associated compound is in keeping with the surrounding commercial and industrial uses and the character of an industrial park.  The placement of a monopole and associated compound is in keeping with the permitted uses of the IPM zone as private utility infrastructure.  The applicant has demonstrated exceptional practical difficulty as a 35 foot tall monopole would be insufficient at providing adequate services. Advisory Comments to Applicant:

V-17-01 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless at 118 Galaxy Dr Board of Adjustment Report Page 7 of 8 ● Improvements to the property are subject to Site Development Plan approval processes and appropriate permits from the City of Dover Planning Department and other agencies. Based on existing information provided, it would be filed as an Administrative Site Plan. ● Variances become null and void if work has not commenced within one (1) year of the date the variance was granted. At present there is no provision for extension of variance approval.

V-17-01 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless at 118 Galaxy Dr Board of Adjustment Report APPENDIX/ATTACHMENTS GUIDE TO ATTACHMENTS Exhibit Description/Author # Pages A V-15-13 Notice of Decision 2 (City Solicitor/Board of Adjustment) B Zoning Exhibit Map 1 (Staff) C Site Plans: “DOV- Charger Way” 9 (Applicant) Pages cited in Report: Z-1, Z-2, Z-3 D Zoning Exhibit Map #2 (Wetland Areas) 1 (Staff)

Exhibit A

City of Dover Exhibit B Application No.: V-15-13 Department of Planning & Inspections APZ I Ho rs ep on M d Rd CZ Starlifter A ve IPM M Ga lax yD r IPM Site Hors R-8 epon d Rd R-8 Ln Mays CZ R-8 e s Rd R-8 J an nesC Ja ir R-20 Title: Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless Legend Address: 118 Galaxy Dr Subject Property Noise Zones Parcel ID: ED-05-087.00-01-07.13-000 Zoning 65db Area A Zoning: IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone 4 Dover Parcels 70db Area B Owner: Independent Newspapers Inc Date: 8/24/2015 Kent County Parcels 75db Area C Dover Boundary 80db Area D Air Accident Zone APZ I « 0 400 800 1,600 Feet APZ II CZ

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Exhibit C CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a 5175 CAMPUS DRIVE PLYMOUTH MEETING, PENNSYLVANIA 19462 advantage engineers SITE NAME: DOV-CHARGER WAY 7 SCHEDULE OF REVISIONS 6 NEW BUILD 5 4 3 118 GALAXY DRIVE 2 08-04-15 REVISED ZONING DATA DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 1 07-17-15 REVISED 0 05-22-15 ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW (ZDs) KENT COUNTY REV. NO. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES SITE INFORMATION DRAWN BY: EV SITE NAME: DOV-CHARGER WAY CHECKED BY: JF SITE ADDRESS: 118 GALAXY DRIVE DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 SCALE: NOTED JURISDICTION: KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE N JOB NO: M130625.00 ZONING: IPM - PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PARK TAX PARCEL #: 2-05-08700-01-0713-00001 DRAWING TITLE: PARCEL SIZE / COMPOUND SIZE: 6.5 ACRES / 2,500 S.F. SITE COORDINATES: N 39° 08' 30.45" (NAD 83) W 75° 28' 21.98" (NAD 83) TITLE DEED BOOK / PAGE: 699 / 90 SHEET GROUND ELEVATION: 26'± (AMSL) STRUCTURE TYPE: MONOPOLE STRUCTURE HEIGHT: 150'± AGL DRAWING SHEET: T-1 OVERALL HEIGHT: 158'± AGL (TOP OF LIGHTNING ROD) ANTENNA RAD CENTER: 150'± AGL Exhibit B LANDLORD NAME: INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS, INC. CONTACT NAME: ED DULAN 302-270-2292 SITE SHEET INDEX LANDLORD ADDRESS: 110 GALAXY DRIVE SHEET NUMBER: DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 DRAWING DRAWING TITLE SHEET APPLICANT: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A 1 OF 9 VERIZON WIRELESS T-1 TITLE SHEET 5175 CAMPUS DRIVE PLYMOUTH MEETING, PENNSYLVANIA 19462 Z-1 SITE PLAN SITE INFORMATION: APPLICANT CONTACT: JOHN HERRIOTT Z-2 COMPOUND PLAN (609) 439-1200 Z-3 ELEVATION SITE NAME: Z-4 SHELTER, FOUNDATION DETAILS & NOTES DOV-CHARGER WAY Z-5 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CODE ANALYSIS Z-6 GENERATOR DETAILS SITE ADDRESS: Z-7 LP TANK DETAILS 118 GALAXY DRIVE BUILDING CODE: IBC 2012 Z-8 ANTENNA PLAN & DETAILS DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 ELECTRICAL CODE: NEC 2011 FIRE CODE: NFPA 1 2009, 2012 NFPA 101 JURISDICTION: USE GROUP: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: U (UTILITY) IIB AREA MAP PROJECT CONTACT INFO CITY OF DOVER KENT COUNTY DOVER, DELAWARE VERIZON WIRELESS ENGINEER: TARRA GOSNELL SCALE: 1" = 2,000'-0" VERIZON WIRELESS RF ENGINEER: LELAND BROWN PROJECT DESCRIPTION DIRECTIONS: VERIZON WIRELESS OPERATIONS MANAGER: PETER BURKE 1. NEW EQUIPMENT SHELTER TO BE INSTALLED ON NEW CONCRETE PAD. DEPART CAMPUS DRIVE TOWARD BUTLER PIKE. TURN LEFT ONTO COLD POINT HILL ROAD. 2. NEW 35 kW GENERATOR TO BE INSTALLED ON NEW CONCRETE PAD. KEEP STRAIGHT ONTO BUTLER PIKE. TURN RIGHT ONTO PLYMOUTH ROAD. TAKE RAMP VERIZON WIRELESS REAL ESTATE CONTACT: JOHN HERRIOTT LEFT FOR I-476 SOUTH TOWARD VALLEY FORGE / CHESTER. TAKE RAMP RIGHT FOR I-95 3. NEW PROPANE TANK TO BE INSTALLED ON NEW CONCRETE PAD. SOUTH TOWARD CHESTER. AT EXIT 11, TAKE RAMP RIGHT FOR I-495 SOUTH TOWARD PORT OF WILMINGTON / BALTIMORE. KEEP STRAIGHT ONTO I-95 SOUTH / US-202 SOUTH. AT EXIT VERIZON WIRELESS AE CONTACT: TOM LADIK 4. TWELVE (12) NEW ANTENNAS AND ANTENNA MOUNTS TO BE INSTALLED ON TOWER. 4A, TAKE RAMP RIGHT FOR SR-7 SOUTH / SR-1 SOUTH TOWARD BEACHES / DOVER. BEAR RIGHT ONTO US-13 SOUTH / SR-1 SOUTH / SOUTH DUPONT HIGHWAY. KEEP STRAIGHT ONTO 5. TWO (2) NEW HYBRID CABLES TO BE INSTALLED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF THE POWER CONTACT: CITY OF DOVER SR-1 SOUTH. AT EXIT 98, TAKE RAMP RIGHT FOR SR-8 TOWARD DOWNTOWN DOVER / LITTLE TOWER AND ALONG A NEW ICE BRIDGE. 302-349-9090 CREEK. TURN LEFT ONTO SR-8 / NORTH LITTLE CREEK ROAD. TURN RIGHT ONTO FOX ROAD. 6. NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BE INSTALLED TO SHELTER. TURN LEFT ONTO SOUTH LITTLE CREEK ROAD. TURN RIGHT ONTO HORSEPOND ROAD. TURN LEFT ONTO STARLIFTER AVENUE. TURN LEFT ONTO GALAXY DRIVE. THE SITE IS ON THE TELCO CONTACT: VERIZON 7. NEW TELEPHONE SERVICE TO BE INSTALLED TO SHELTER. LEFT HAND SIDE. W. JEFFERY NAGORNY, P.E. DELAWARE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSE # 9553

GENERAL NOTES: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a N 5175 CAMPUS DRIVE PLYMOUTH MEETING, S 72 PENNSYLVANIA 19462 °11' 22" E 251 .60' GA LA XY R= 2,8 39 DR .79 IV ' L= E 37 5.2 7' advantage engineers OWNER: INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS, INC. PREMISES ADDRESS: BULK REQUIREMENTS 118 GALAXY DRIVE ROAD, DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 ZONING DISTRICT: IPM - PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PARK PARCEL: 2-05-08700-01-0713-00001 SCHEDULE OF REVISIONS LAND AREA: 6.50 AC. DESCRIPTION REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED 86.10' ZONING: IPM - PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PARK MIN. AREA: 2.5 AC (avg) / 6.5 ACRES NO CHANGE 7 60,000 SF (min.) '30" W 4 MIN. LOT WIDTH 150 FT ±629 FT NO CHANGE 6 MIN. LOT DEPTH 250 FT ±512 FT NO CHANGE N 08°01 MIN. FRONT YARD: 60 FT N/A ±62 FT 5 MIN. SIDE YARD: 40 FT N/A ±98 FT MIN. REAR YARD: 40 FT N/A N/A MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: N/A 4 35 FT/2 STORIES * ±158 FT 3 * VARIANCE REQUESTED (TOP OF LIGHTING ROD) " W 203.4 2 08-04-15 REVISED ZONING DATA 9'' 1 07-17-15 REVISED 0 05-22-15 ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW (ZDs) S 06°29'02 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES NO. DRAWN BY: EV CHECKED BY: JF SCALE: NOTED JOB NO: M130625.00 DRAWING TITLE: SITE PLAN N 00°07'46" W 25 1.6 0' 88.63' "E '22 DRAWING SHEET: 2°1 Z-1 1 S7 SHEET NUMBER: HO R= 2,8 RS 39 .79 2 OF 9 EP ' L= ON 37 5.2 SITE INFORMATION: D 7' RO AD SITE NAME: (C DOV-CHARGER WAY R #3 SITE ADDRESS: 84 118 GALAXY DRIVE ) DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 JURISDICTION: CITY OF DOVER KENT COUNTY 1 SITE PLAN Z-1 SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" Know what's below. Call before you dig. W. JEFFERY NAGORNY, P.E. DELAWARE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSE # 9553

GENERAL NOTES CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a N 5175 CAMPUS DRIVE PLYMOUTH MEETING, PENNSYLVANIA 19462 advantage engineers SCHEDULE OF REVISIONS 7 6 5 4 3 2 08-04-15 REVISED ZONING DATA 1 07-17-15 REVISED 0 05-22-15 ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW (ZDs) REV. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES NO. DRAWN BY: EV CHECKED BY: JF SCALE: NOTED JOB NO: M130625.00 DRAWING TITLE: COMPOUND PLAN DRAWING SHEET: Z-2 SHEET NUMBER: 3 OF 9 SITE INFORMATION: SITE NAME: DOV-CHARGER WAY SITE ADDRESS: 118 GALAXY DRIVE DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 JURISDICTION: CITY OF DOVER KENT COUNTY 1 COMPOUND PLAN Z-2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Know what's below. Call before you dig. W. JEFFERY NAGORNY, P.E. DELAWARE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSE # 9553

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a 5175 CAMPUS DRIVE PLYMOUTH MEETING, PENNSYLVANIA 19462 advantage engineers SCHEDULE OF REVISIONS 7 6 5 4 3 2 08-04-15 REVISED ZONING DATA 1 07-17-15 REVISED 0 05-22-15 ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW (ZDs) REV. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES NO. DRAWN BY: EV CHECKED BY: JF SCALE: NOTED JOB NO: M130625.00 DRAWING TITLE: ELEVATION DRAWING SHEET: Z-3 SHEET NUMBER: 4 OF 9 SITE INFORMATION: SITE NAME: DOV-CHARGER WAY SITE ADDRESS: 118 GALAXY DRIVE DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 JURISDICTION: CITY OF DOVER KENT COUNTY 1 ELEVATION Z-3 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" W. JEFFERY NAGORNY, P.E. DELAWARE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSE # 9553

FOUNDATION NOTES: 1. DESIGN INFORMATION AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a 2. EARTHWORK 5175 CAMPUS DRIVE PLYMOUTH MEETING, PENNSYLVANIA 19462 6 SECTION Z-4 NTS advantage engineers 3. CONCRETE 1 SHELTER ELEVATION 3 SHELTER ELEVATION Z-4 NTS (L. SIDE VIEW) Z-4 NTS (R. SIDE VIEW) SCHEDULE OF REVISIONS 7 6 5 7 SECTION 4 Z-4 NTS 3 FIBRE BOND C OR PORA TION 2 08-04-15 REVISED ZONING DATA 1 07-17-15 REVISED 0 05-22-15 ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW (ZDs) REV. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES NO. DRAWN BY: EV CHECKED BY: JF SCALE: NOTED JOB NO: M130625.00 DRAWING TITLE: 2 SHELTER ELEVATION 4 SHELTER ELEVATION SHELTER, FOUNDATION TIE DOWN PLATE DETAIL Z-4 NTS (REAR VIEW) Z-4 NTS (FRONT VIEW) 8 Z-4 DETAILS & NOTES DRAWING SHEET: 7 Z-4 10 6 Z-4 SHEET NUMBER: Z-4 Z-4 5 OF 9 SITE INFORMATION: 9 SITE NAME: Z-4 DOV-CHARGER WAY SITE ADDRESS: 9 CONCRETE STEP DETAIL 118 GALAXY DRIVE Z-4 NTS DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 JURISDICTION: CITY OF DOVER KENT COUNTY 10 PAD SECTION Z-4 NTS (TYP ALL SIDES) W. JEFFERY NAGORNY, P.E. 5 FOUNDATION PLAN DELAWARE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NTS LICENSE # 9553 Z-4

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a 5175 CAMPUS DRIVE PLYMOUTH MEETING, PENNSYLVANIA 19462 advantage engineers 2 CABLE SUPPORT SECTION Z-5 NTS SCHEDULE OF REVISIONS 7 6 5 4 3 2 08-04-15 REVISED ZONING DATA 1 07-17-15 REVISED 5 CABLE SUPPORT SECTION Z-5 NTS 0 05-22-15 ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW (ZDs) REV. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES NO. DRAWN BY: EV CHECKED BY: JF SCALE: NOTED JOB NO: M130625.00 DRAWING TITLE: 1 ICE BRIDGE SECTION 3 UTILITY BACKBOARD DETAIL 4 CABLE ENTRY PORT DETAIL CONSTRUCTION Z-5 NTS Z-5 NTS Z-5 NTS (EXTERIOR VIEW) DETAILS DRAWING SHEET: Z-5 SHEET NUMBER: 6 OF 9 SITE INFORMATION: SITE NAME: DOV-CHARGER WAY SITE ADDRESS: 118 GALAXY DRIVE DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 JURISDICTION: CITY OF DOVER KENT COUNTY 6 TYPICAL FENCE & GATE DETAIL 7 MESA XL CABINET AND HAND HOLE DETAIL Z-5 NTS Z-5 NTS W. JEFFERY NAGORNY, P.E. DELAWARE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSE # 9553

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a 6 Z-6 5175 CAMPUS DRIVE PLYMOUTH MEETING, PENNSYLVANIA 19462 5 Z-6 advantage engineers 3 GENERATOR CONCRETE PAD DETAIL Z-6 NTS 4 CONCRETE PAD SECTION Z-6 NTS SCHEDULE OF REVISIONS 7 6 5 4 3 2 08-04-15 REVISED ZONING DATA 1 07-17-15 REVISED 0 05-22-15 ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW (ZDs) REV. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES NO. DRAWN BY: EV 5 CONCRETE PAD SECTION CHECKED BY: JF Z-6 NTS SCALE: NOTED JOB NO: M130625.00 DRAWING TITLE: GENERATOR DETAILS DRAWING SHEET: Z-6 6 CONCRETE PAD SECTION Z-6 NTS SHEET NUMBER: 7 OF 9 SITE INFORMATION: SITE NAME: DOV-CHARGER WAY SITE ADDRESS: 118 GALAXY DRIVE 1 35kW GAS GENERATOR DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 Z-6 NTS JURISDICTION: CITY OF DOVER KENT COUNTY 2 GENERATOR STUB-UP AREA 7 GENERATOR CONDUIT TRENCH DETAIL W. JEFFERY NAGORNY, P.E. DELAWARE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Z-6 NTS Z-6 NTS LICENSE # 9553

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a 5175 CAMPUS DRIVE PLYMOUTH MEETING, PENNSYLVANIA 19462 advantage engineers N SCHEDULE OF REVISIONS 7 6 5 4 3 2 08-04-15 REVISED ZONING DATA 1 07-17-15 REVISED 0 05-22-15 ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW (ZDs) REV. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES NO. DRAWN BY: EV CHECKED BY: JF SCALE: NOTED JOB NO: M130625.00 DRAWING TITLE: ANTENNA PLAN & DETAILS DRAWING SHEET: Z-8 SHEET NUMBER: 9 OF 9 SITE INFORMATION: SITE NAME: 1 PROPOSED ANTENNA PLAN DOV-CHARGER WAY Z-8 NTS SITE ADDRESS: 118 GALAXY DRIVE DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 JURISDICTION: CITY OF DOVER 2 ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL (SIDE VIEW) 3 GPS ANTENNA ELEVATION DETAIL KENT COUNTY Z-8 NTS Z-8 NTS W. JEFFERY NAGORNY, P.E. DELAWARE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSE # 9553

City of Dover Exhibit D Application No.: V-15-13 Department of Planning & Inspections ve S ta rli fte r A Ga la x yD r Site H o rs e po n d Rd Ln M a ys es Rd J an Ja sC ne ir Title: Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless Address: 118 Galaxy Dr Legend Parcel ID: ED-05-087.00-01-07.13-000 Zoning: IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone 4 Dover Parcels Owner: Independent Newspapers Inc Kent County Parcels Date: 8/24/2015 Subject Property Wetland Areas « 0 375 750 1,5 00 Fee t 2012 Buildings

City of Dover Board of Adjustment January 18, 2017 V-17-02 Location: 341 Saulsbury Road Applicant: Pastor Elmer Davis Owner: Whatcoat Methodist Church Tax Parcel: ED-05-067.19-02-10.00-000 Application Date: December 14, 2016 Present Zoning: RG-1 (General Residence Zone) COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) Present Use: Place of Public Assembly Proposed Use: No Change Reviewed By: Bill Cook, Planner I Variance Type: Area Variance Variance Requested: Variance to increase the maximum allowed sign area by 12 SF in order to permit a 24 SF monument sign.

V-17-02 Whatcoat UM Church Signage at 341 Saulsbury Road Board of Adjustment Report Page 2 of 7 Project Description The property is located at 341 Saulsbury Road and is occupied by Whatcoat United Methodist Church. The applicant is requesting an area variance from the requirements of the sign regulations in Zoning Ordinance Article 5 §4.7 to allow an increase in the maximum sign area for a monument sign located on frontage of an Urban Minor Arterial street, located within a residential zoning district. The use of the property as a place of public assembly, such as a church, is a Conditional Use within the RG-1 (General Residence Zone). Adjacent Zoning and Land UseThe subject property is zoned RG-1. A portion of the property is also within the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). This overlay zone includes provisions related to building and site design that apply to new development, but there are no provisions related to signage. The immediately adjacent properties are primarily professional office and multi-family residential uses. Properties to the north and across Saulsbury Road to the west are zoned CPO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) and feature numerous office uses and a day care center. To the south of the subject property is Whatcoat Village Apartments, recently rezoned to RG-2 (General Residence Zone) from RG-1. Further south lies Edgewell Personal Care (formerly Playtex) zoned IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone). A Zoning Map exhibit (Exhibit A) prepared by staff is attached to this report showing the subject property location and surrounding zoning. Code Citations Signage The City of Dover sign regulations found in Zoning Ordinance Article 5 §4 determine the allowable number, type and dimensional characteristics of signage on a property according to: ● The type of use ● Proximity to residential uses ● Classification of roads on which the property has frontage The subject property is considered a conditional, non-residential use located in a residential zone as defined by Article 3 §2.11 and §1.14, and Article 5 §4.3 of the Zoning Ordinance. RG-1 is among the residential zones: Residence zones: R-20, R-15, R-10, R-8, R-7, RM-1, RM-2, RG-1, RG-2, RG-3, RG-4, RG- 5, RGO, or MHP zone. The City of Dover sign regulations distinguish three (3) types of roads for purposes of determining allowable signage. Saulsbury Road is an “Urban Minor Arterial” as defined by Article 5 §4.3.

V-17-02 Whatcoat UM Church Signage at 341 Saulsbury Road Board of Adjustment Report Page 3 of 7 The entire “Sign Table” from Zoning Ordinance Article 3 §4.7 is presented in Exhibit B. The section pertaining to this project is at the top of the table and colored with a light blue background. This section is what applies to “Residential Uses and Nonresidential Uses in Residential Districts” as shown in the vertical text on the left, and shows the maximum number, sign area, height, and minimum required setbacks and exclusion zones for signs on “All Streets.” The provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in Article 3 §1.19, related to signs for permitted conditional uses in the RG-1 district refers to the provisions of the Sign Regulations in Zoning Ordinance Article 5 §4. When referring to the “Sign Table” in Exhibit B, and the listing of specific uses in “Residential Uses and Nonresidential Uses in Residential Districts,” the code does not specifically address Conditional Uses in such situations. Existing Signage Building Permit #012577 was issued September 28, 1994 for a 32 square foot internally illuminated monument sign with a brick base and a changeable message area. This sign is shown in Exhibit C. There is also lettering on the wall of the structure, however this and other existing signage on the site is not pertinent to this application. Proposed Signage The applicant submitted a Building Permit Application #16-1734 on November 1, 2016 for a 24 square foot internally illuminated monument sign with an electronic message center display in a new proposed location on the site. An image of the sign with measurements is found in Exhibit C. While the proposed new sign is smaller in area than the sign it is intended to replace, because the sign is completely new and in a new location, the current sign regulations apply and there are no existing legal non-conformities which would allow the 24 square foot sign. Exceptional Practical Difficulties Tests Zoning Ordinance Article 9 §2 dictates the specific powers and duties of the Board of Adjustment with regard to granting variances. Specifically the Board must determine: 2.1 Variance – The board shall have the authority to authorize variances from provisions of the Zoning Ordinance that are not contrary to public interest where the board determines that a literal interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance would result in undue hardship or exceptional practical difficulties to the applicant. In granting variances, the board shall determine that the spirit of the Zoning Ordinance is observed and substantial justice is done. 2.11 Area Variance. A variance shall be considered an area variance if it relates to bulk standards, signage regulations, and other provisions of the Zoning Ordinance that address lot layout, buffers, and dimensions. In considering a request for an area variance, the board shall

V-17-02 Whatcoat UM Church Signage at 341 Saulsbury Road Board of Adjustment Report Page 4 of 7 evaluate the following criteria and document them in their findings of fact: (a) the nature of the zone in which the property lies; (b) the character of the immediate vicinity and the contained uses therein; (c) whether, if the restriction upon the applicant’s property were removed, such removal would seriously affect neighboring properties and uses; and (d) whether, if the restriction is not removed, the restriction would create unnecessary hardship or exceptional practical difficulty for the owner in his efforts to make normal improvements in the character of that use of the property that is a permitted use under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Review of Application As part of the application, the applicant was asked to summarize how the requested variance relates to the criteria. (Exhibit A: Page 2) 1. The nature of the zone in which the property lies. Applicant Responses: “The property is a conditional use in a residential zone. RG-1. The maximum permitted sign area for this site is 12 square feet. We are asking permission to remove the existing 32 square foot sign and install a 24 square foot Electronic Message Board sign.” Staff Response: As previously noted by Staff, Conditional Uses are not expressly specified in the “Sign Table” in Exhibit B pertaining to the location of this property, but Staff would generally interpret the permitted maximum sign area to be 12 square feet. Conditional Uses, such as churches or places of public assembly, are permitted in residential districts. Such uses would be consistent with the nature of the zone, and it is common for churches to be found in residential zones around the city. 2. The character of the immediate vicinity and the contained uses therein. Applicant Responses: “There are several other businesses and an apartment complex that surround the subject site. We have enclosed photos of the businesses showing the existing signs on their property all of which are larger than the 12 square feet that we are limited to under the zoning for our property.” Staff Response: Staff concurs with applicant’s description of the surrounding area, and additionally notes that the adjacent Whatcoat Apartments property located to the south has an existing

V-17-02 Whatcoat UM Church Signage at 341 Saulsbury Road Board of Adjustment Report Page 5 of 7 monument sign of undetermined size. Staff notes that under the provisions of the current sign regulations, a “Multi-Family Residential Use” would be permitted a 32 square foot monument sign. 3. Whether, if the restriction upon the applicant’s property were removed, such removal would seriously affect neighboring properties and uses. Applicant Responses: “We do not feel removing this restriction would have any adverse effects on the neighboring properties as we currently have a 32 square foot sign and are requesting to decrease the size down to 24 square feet. The new proposed sign would be located further away from the apartment complex than the current sign.” Staff Response: The Saulsbury Road corridor contains a mix of uses, primarily professional office and institutional along this segment, with retail and other commercial uses located farther south. There are numerous monument signs located along the road frontage, and most appear to be about 32 square feet or less. The proposed sign is smaller than the sign it is intended to replace. The proposed location is farther away from the adjacent apartment complex and also sited closer to the road. 4. Whether, if the restriction is not removed, the restriction would create unnecessary hardship or exceptional practical difficulty for the owner in his efforts to make normal improvements in the character of that use of the property that is a permitted use under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicant Responses: “We are looking to remove our existing outdated sign and upgrade to a more functional sign for the church. We cannot accomplish this with a 12 square foot sign. If we were required to go from our existing 32 square foot sign down to the allowable 12 square foot sign it would create exceptional practical difficulty.” Staff Response: The proposed sign area at 24 square feet would not be out of character with the use of the property as a church. Many churches throughout Dover have similar signs that display the name of the congregation, hours of services, and also include a message area (either electronic or non-electronic) to display inspirational messages, announcements of events, etc. Other churches may be Conditional Uses in residential zones, or they may be permitted uses in non-residential zones.

V-17-02 Whatcoat UM Church Signage at 341 Saulsbury Road Board of Adjustment Report Page 6 of 7 In the absence of specific direction in the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the maximum allowable sign area for a Conditional Use in this location, Staff would likely permit a monument sign at a maximum of 12 square feet, which is the most restrictive standard. Variance Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the variance for the 12 square feet increase in sign area for the monument sign to permit a 24 square feet sign for reasons as follows: ● The proposed sign is in keeping with the character and nature of the zone and the permitted Conditional Uses for the zone. ● The proposed sign is in character with the immediate surroundings and would not seriously impact surrounding uses. ● The proposed sign represents a decrease in overall sign area compared to the sign it is intended to replace. ● The sign regulations are generally based on a relationship between the classification of street and its typical traffic conditions. Staff believes that a 24 square feet monument sign presents a legible sign design that could be safely read but not be distracting. A 12 square foot sign would be somewhat undersized relative to the prevailing speeds on the street and the size of the property’s road frontage. ● The Zoning Ordinance does not specifically address Conditional Uses in this particular situation, which is an oversight that is intended to be corrected in future amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. ● Limiting the sign area to 12 square feet may impose a hardship on the property since similar establishments are typically entitled to a larger sign area for the same type of use. Advisory Comments to Applicant: ● Variances become null and void if work has not commenced within one (1) year of the date the variance was granted. At present there is no provision for extension of variance approvals. ● The placement and size of address numbers are not regulated by the Sign Regulations. Contact the Fire Marshal’s Office at 302-736-7010 to confirm size and placement.

V-17-02 341 Saulsbury Road Board of Adjustment Report APPENDIX/ATTACHMENTS GUIDE TO ATTACHMENTS Exhibit Description/Author # Pages A Zoning Exhibit Map 1 (Staff) B “Sign Table” reproduced from Zoning Ordinance 1 Article 5 §4.7 (Staff) C Images of surrounding properties, aerial photo, 3 images of existing and proposed signs. (Applicant)

City of Dover Exhibit A Application No.: V-17-02 Department of Planning & Inspections R-8 C-1A Dr e R-8 C-2A ttn w Bu o l lo il H rP R-7 CPO V irg inia Qu a l Ann Ave R-7 R-7 ee C-2A McK Ave Hitching Post Dr Rd SC-1 M e Villag Rd er Dr Walk CPO ROS CPO RG-1 Cir Site erg Arlb Dr tcoat Wha R-8 RG-2 tB Sauls Mon R ir lanc bury d berg Bl v d C Ho m R-8 er Matt ino D t Be rnad IPM horn ROS S ain Cir r ntennial Blvd B ice ROS R-8 CPO Title: Whatcoat United Methodist Church Monument Sign Address: 341 Saulsbury Road Legend Parcel ID: ED-05-067.19-02-10.00-000 Zoning: RG-1, COZ-1 Subject Parcel Owner: Whatcoat Methodist Church Dover Parcels Date: 1/12/2017 Zoning Corridor Overlay Zone « 0 175 350 700 Feet 2012 Buildings

Exhibit B Zoning Ordinance , Article 5 §4.7 SIGN TABLE Use Road Type Permitted Signs Specific Sign Type Number Max. Size Max. % of Total Setback Exclusion Permitted Height Wall Area (R.O.W.) Zone Single-Family Detached Residential Uses and All Streets Signs permitted in § 4.5 only Semi-Detached Post or 1/entrance 12 S.F. 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet Nonresidential Uses in Professional Office All Streets Monument Wall 1/frontage 16 S.F. N/A < = 15% N/A N/A Wall & 1/frontage 32 S.F. N/A < = 15% N/A N/A Residential Districts Subdivisions Multi-Family Residential Uses All Streets Mobile Home Parks Monument or 2/entrance 32 S.F. 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet Post and Panel Places of Worship Wall & 2/frontage 32 S.F. N/A < = 15% N/A N/A Monument or 1/entrance 32 S.F. 7 feet N/A 10 feet 20 feet Daycare Centers Post and Panel Urban Principal OR Nonresidential Uses Adjacent to Arterial Approved Conditional Uses Post** & 1/frontage 16 S.F. 7 feet N/A 5 feet 5 feet Educational/ Institutional Pylon* 1/frontage 32 S.F. 30 feet N/A 30 feet 50 feet Wall & 2/frontage 32 S.F. N/A < = 15% N/A N/A Monument or 1/entrance 32 S.F. 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet Urban Minor Post and Panel All Other Approved Arterial OR Residential Districts or Uses Nonresidential Uses Post** 1/frontage 16 S.F. 7 feet N/A 5 feet 10 feet Wall & 2/frontage 32 S.F. N/A < = 15% N/A N/A Urban Local/ Monument or 1/entrance 32 S.F. 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet Collector Post and Panel OR Post** 1/frontage 16 S.F. 7 feet N/A 5 feet 10 feet Wall & 2/frontage No max N/A < = 15% N/A N/A Monument or 1/entrance 100 S.F. 10 feet N/A 10 feet 20 feet Urban Principal Post and Panel Arterial & Pylon OR * 1/frontage 100 S.F. 30 feet N/A 15 feet 50 feet Nonresidential Uses in Pylon* 1/frontage 150 S.F. 30 feet N/A 31 feet 50 feet Wall & 2/frontage 64 S.F. N/A < =15% N/A N/A Monument or 1/entrance 64 S.F. 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet Urban Minor Nonresidential Uses Post and Panel Arterial OR Nonresidential Districts Post** 1/frontage 16 S.F. 7 feet N/A 5 feet 10 feet Wall & 2/frontage 32 S.F. N/A < = 15% N/A N/A Urban Local/ Monument or 1/entrance 32 S.F. 7 feet N/A 5 feet 20 feet Collector Post and Panel OR Post** 1/frontage 16 S.F. 7 feet N/A 5 feet 10 feet * Denotes that an additional wall sign may be permitted/added in lieu of a freestanding pylon sign. ** Post sign would be in lieu of a monument sign or post and panel sign.

Exhibit C