COUNCIL PACKET

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA August 9, 2010 - 7:30 P.M. - Council Chambers - City Hall - City of Dover OPEN FORUM - 15 MINUTES PRIOR TO OFFICIAL MEETING (7:15 P.M.) INVOCATION BY CHAPLAIN WALLACE DIXON PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS * CONSENT AGENDA Those items on the Council Agenda which are considered routine and non-controversial shall be marked with an asterisk (*) and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. * 1. Adoption of Minutes - Regular Council Meeting of July 26, 2010 2. Presentations - Dover Human Relations Commission Members 3. Public Hearing/Adoption of Proposed Resolution No. 2010-07 Approving Alley Abandonment - 100 Block of North Governors Avenue Alley West, the Southern Portion of the 200 Block of North Governors Avenue Alley East, a Portion of the Unit Block of North Bradford Street, the Unit Block of Fulton Street, a Portion of the Unit Block of Cecil Street, a Portion of the 200 Block of North Bradford Street, and the Northern Portion of the Unit Block of North State Street Alley West - Wesley College 4. Public Hearing/Final Reading - Proposed Ordinances The First Reading of the following proposed ordinances was accomplished during the Council Meeting of June 28, 2010. Copies of the proposed ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers. A. Proposed Ordinance #2010-18 - Appendix B - Zoning, Article 9 - Board of Adjustment B. Proposed Ordinance #2010-21 - Recreational and Open Space (ROS) Zone Map Amendments 5. Utility Committee Report - July 26, 2010 A. Review of New Utility Bill Format (Committee Recommended Acceptance of the New Utility Bill Format) * B. Review of Utility Related CIP's (Electric and Water/Wastewater) (Committee Recommended Acceptance of the Report)

Council Agenda - August 9, 2010 Page 2 * 6. Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report - July 26, 2010 A. Review and Recommendation - Filling Critical Positions a-1. Utility Maintenance Mechanic I and II (Committee Recommended Approval to Recruit for the Utility Maintenance Mechanic I and II Positions) a-2. Library Clerk I (Committee Recommended Approval to Recruit for the Library Clerk I Position) a-3. Extension of Approval for Part Time Account Clerk III (Finance) (Committee Recommended Approval to Extend the Part Time Account Clerk III Position) B. Procedure to Fill a Vacant or New Position (Committee Recommended Acceptance of the Report) C. Proposed Ordinance #2010-23 Related to Requirement to Step Down When Running for Other Office (See Item #10A) (Committee Recommended Acceptance of Proposed Ordinance #2010-23 - Related to the Requirement to Step Down When Running for Other Office) D. Discussion - Public Indecency Ordinance (Sponsors: Salters, Bonar, and Russell) (Committee Recommended that Consideration of the Public Indecency Ordinance be Referred to the City Solicitor for Further Evaluation) E. Title V Grant Application - Growing Up and Meeting Each Success (GAMES) Partnership with Aid in Dover (Committee Deferred Consideration of the Title V Grant Until the Grant Application Process has been Completed in its Entirety) F. Results of Workers Compensation Fund Actuarial Review (Committee Recommended Acceptance of the Workers Compensation Actuarial Report) G. OPEB Actuary Interim Update (Committee Recommended Acceptance of the Interim Year Governmental Accounting Standards Board [GASB] 45 Disclosures for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010) H. Health Care Reform - Summary of Changes (Committee Recommended Acceptance of the Health Care Reform - Summary of Changes Report) * 7. Monthly Reports - June 2010 A. Chief of Police Report B. City Assessor Report C. City Manager’s Report D. City Planner’s Report E. Dover Fire Department Report 8. IBEW Contract Settlement 9. Evaluation of Bids A. System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Equipment Technology Upgrade B. LED Street Light Conversion C. Sanitary Sewer Main Relining (Inflow and Infiltration Removal)

Council Agenda - August 9, 2010 Page 3 10. First Reading - Proposed Ordinance The First Reading is offered on the following proposed ordinance. Final action by Council will take place during the Second Reading of the ordinances on August 23, 2010. Copies of all proposed ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. A. Proposed Ordinance #2010-23 Related to Requirement to Step Down When Running for Other Office (Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee) 11. Council Members Announcements /tm S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Council-Agendas\2010\08-09-2010.wpd THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING The Regular Council Meeting was held on July 26, 2010 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Hogan presiding. Council members present were Mrs. Russell, Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. Leary, Mr. McGiffin, Mrs. Williams, and Mr. Salters. Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane were absent. Council staff members present were Captain Timothy Stump, Ms. Russell, Mrs. Mitchell, Mrs. Townshend, Fire Chief Christiansen, Mr. DePrima, City Solicitor Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Mayor Carey was also present. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to the commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Hogan declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council is not in official session and cannot take formal action. Mr. EShed Alston, 46 Arnold Court, reminded members that his previous requests for consideration of ordinances and concerns are not being considered by Council for action (See Open Forum Segment of the Regular Council Meeting of July 12, 2010). He relayed the importance of the proposed ordinances as they are relative to the recent public disrespect for God. The invocation was given by Chaplain Dixon, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Council President Hogan advised members that staff requested that Item #9-B, Evaluation of Bids - Sanitary Sewer Main Relining (Inflow and Infiltration Removal), be removed from the agenda. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, indicated that there was a concern with the low bid; therefore, staff would like the opportunity to further evaluate the bids. Mr. Leary moved for approval of the agenda as amended, seconded by McGlumphy and unanimously carried. Council President Hogan indicated that Item #8, Monthly CIP Report - May 2010, was inadvertently left off of the Consent Agenda and requested that it be amended to include this item. Mr. Leary moved for approval of the consent agenda as amended, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 12, 2010 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of July 12, 2010 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Leary, seconded by Mrs. Russell and bore the written approval of Mayor Carey.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 2 CERTIFICATES OF RECOGNITION - SUPPORT OF WOODCREST APARTMENT FIRE VICTIMS The following Certificates of Recognition were read into the record by Mrs. Traci McDowell, City Clerk: To The Community On behalf of the City of Dover we would like to recognize all of the individuals, businesses and organizations in the Greater Dover Area, who were incredibly generous in the giving of donations to aid in helping the victims of the Woodcrest Apartment fire. We should all feel proud of living in a community where people come together in such dire times. The outpouring of donations was astronomical, and continued on for weeks to follow. Thank you again for making Dover a place where people want to live. Gene Montano, William Cintron, and Kevin Fountain of Dover High School in the Capital School District WHEREAS, in a society where things can change so rapidly, the importance of community involvement remains constant; and WHEREAS, affectionate, caring people are essential to the growth and development of a community and we recognize the leaders who stand out amongst us as the basis of our City's strength and morality; and WHEREAS, the Capital School District continued to support the community in aiding with a shelter in the time of need; most recently being the fatal fire at the Woodcrest Arms Apartments. We appreciate the dedication of Gene Montano, William Cintron and Kevin Fountain who aided our employees in helping run a shelter that made the victims feel as welcome and comfortable as possible in their time of sorrow and fear. NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE would like to recognize Gene Montano, William Cintron, and Kevin Fountain of Dover High School in the Capital School District for their outstanding participation and community involvement during a tragic time of need. Mayor Carey presented the Certificate to Mr. William Cintron and Mr. Kevin Fountain and relayed appreciation for the assistance provided to the victims. Mayor Carey indicated that Mr. Gene Montano was not able to attend this evening’s meeting; therefore, he attended a recent Board Meeting for the Capital School District and presented Mr. Montano with the Certificate of Recognition at that time.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 3 Rick Gould - YMCA Volunteers WHEREAS, in a society where things can change so rapidly, the importance of volunteering in a community remains constant; and WHEREAS, dedicated, giving people are essential to the well being of any community, we want to recognize Rick Gould, Executive Director of the YMCA as a leader that stands out amongst many and the numerous volunteers who aided the efforts; and WHEREAS, the support you offered to the city to aid in the organization and distribution of donations from our community during the days following the fatal fire at the Woodcrest Arms Apartments was sincerely appreciated. We are grateful to you, your staff, volunteers and members of the YMCA that participated. NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR and COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE would like to recognize Rick Gould - YMCA Volunteers for your outstanding participation and community involvement during a tragic time of need. Mayor Carey presented the Certificate to Mr. Rick Gould and volunteers of the YMCA for the assistance provided to the victims. He noted that the YMCA was disrupted for approximately two (2) weeks in order to provide this assistance. Wayne Hutchison WHEREAS, in a society where the unexpected can change our day so quickly, the importance of your position as Emergency Management Coordinator remains constant; and WHEREAS, dedicated employees are essential to the well being of any organization, particularly to our own municipality, where so many rely upon our services for daily living and education; and WHEREAS, the support you offered to the victims during the day of and those following the fatal fire at the Woodcrest Arms Apartments was sincerely appreciated. For making those at the shelter feel welcome to assisting in distribution of supplies to the victims. We thank you. NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE would like to recognize Wayne Hutchison for your outstanding participation and community involvement during a tragic time of need. Mayor Carey presented the Certificate to Mr. Wayne Hutchison, Emergency Management Coordinator, for his efforts in contacting the various organizations in order to provide services to the victims.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 4 Kay Dietz-Sass WHEREAS, Woodcrest Arms Apartments experienced a tragic, fatal fire on June 6, 2010, resulting in injuries and the displacement of many residents; and WHEREAS, Kay Dietz-Sass, Public Affairs Coordinator for the City of Dover, provided immediate aid and support to victims at the scene of the fire and began the process of establishing a shelter; and WHEREAS, Kay Dietz-Sass coordinated ongoing efforts within the local community to gather food, arrange permanent housing, replace household goods, and collect monetary donations to address the needs of the fire victims; and WHEREAS, Kay Dietz-Sass has maintained personal contact with those affected by the fire to ensure that they are well cared for. NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER would like to recognize Kay Dietz-Sass for her outstanding participation and community involvement during a tragic time of need. Mayor Carey presented the Certificate to Ms. Kay Dietz-Sass, Public Affairs Coordinator, for her efforts in assisting the victims. REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL OF REZONING APPLICATION - PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 217 AND 223 MCKEE ROAD, OWNED BY MOR-KATH-RIC, LLC A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider rezoning of property located at 217 and 223 McKee Road, owned by Mor-Kath-Ric, LLC, consisting of 1.12+/- acres. The property is currently zoned R-7 (One Family Residence) and subject to COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) and the proposed zoning is RM-1 (Medium Density Residence) and subject to the COZ-1. (Ordinance #2010-16; Tax Parcels: ED05-067.15-02-02.00-000 and ED05-067.15- 02-01.00-000; Planning Reference: Z-10-06; Council District: Fourth). The First Reading of Proposed Ordinance #2010-16 was accomplished during the Council Meeting of May 24, 2010. Council President Hogan reminded members that this item was postponed by the Planning Commission during their meeting of June 21, 2010, and on July 12, 2010, City Council rescheduled the public hearing for September 13, 2010. Council President Hogan noted that members had been provided a letter submitted by Mr. Troy Adams, Vice-President of Mor-Kath-Ric, LLC, requesting to withdraw the rezoning application. Mr. McGlumphy moved for approval of the request to withdraw the rezoning application for property located at 217 and 223 McKee Road, owned by Mor-Kath-Ric, LLC. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Williams and unanimously carried (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 5 PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT - JULY 12, 2010 The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee met on July 12, 2010 with Chairwoman Russell presiding. Active Recreation Plan Review: The Arbors - 1051 College Road (C-10-02) Members were provided the Active Recreation Area Plan for the Arbors Condominiums located at 1051 College Road for their review and recommendation as a part of the Conditional Use Site Development Plan. The Conditional Use Site Plan is to permit the construction of an apartment/condominium building with a total of 48 units. This parcel has been subject to several previous applications. The most recent application for development was C-07-05, which proposed a Planned Neighborhood Design for a Senior Housing Option. The Recreation Plan, as submitted with the current application, differs significantly from previous applications. This parcel was subject to a recent rezoning (Z-09-05), changing the zoning of the property from R-8 (One Family Residence Zone) to RG-2 (General Residence Zone). Mr. Michael Albert, Planner II, advised members that the subject property consists of one (1) parcel of land totaling 4.32+/- acres. He explained that the Active Recreation Area is located in two (2) distinct locations within the site, and proposed amenities include a gazebo/picnic/tot-lot playground area, as well as a walking path. Staff submitted the following recommendations and comments regarding the Active Recreation Area Plan: 1. The proposed plan meets the area requirements for the Active Recreation Area. The plan is required to provide 10,000 S.F. of Active Recreation Area and it is proposing 10,600 S.F. of Active Recreation Area. 2. Staff recommended approval of the proposed Active Recreation plan. The site must cater to a wide variety of people and must provide recreation opportunities for them on a relatively small lot. The combination of a walking path to College Road and the sitting/picnic facilities provides opportunities for adults. The tot-lot playground caters to children who may reside in the apartment building as well. 3. The following items should be included on the Plan to clarify the construction of the recreation area improvements: a. Provide lighting around the Active Recreation Areas. b. Provide trash disposal/collection for the playground area. 4. The tot-lot playground should be geared towards children aged 5-12 in order to allow for the greatest usage of the area among residents.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 6 5. The applicant was reminded of the requirements for construction phasing of the recreation area, as associated with the development of the residential units. Article 5 §10.6 Construction Phasing. The recreation and open space areas shall be completed in a proportion equal to or greater than the proportion of residential dwelling units completed, except that one hundred (100) percent of the recreation and open space areas shall be completed prior to issuing building permits for the final twenty (20) percent of the dwelling units proposed. Building permits shall not be issued for dwelling units unless the requirements of this section are met. 6. There shall be provisions which ensure that the common open space land (including Active Recreation Area) shall continue as such and be properly managed and maintained. The developer shall either retain ownership and responsibility for maintenance of such open land or provide for and establish one (1) or more organizations for the ownership and maintenance of all common open space, i.e., a Homeowners Association. The organization shall be responsible for maintenance, insurance, and taxes on the common open space. a. Add a note on the Site Plan regarding who is responsible for maintenance, insurance, and taxes on the common open space. 7. In the event that major changes and revisions to the Conditional Use Site Plan occur in the finalization of the Plan, contact the Planning Office. Examples include reorientation of buildings, relocation of site components like stormwater management areas, and increases in floor area. These changes may require resubmission for review by the Development Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, or other agencies and commissions making recommendations in regards to the plan. In response to Mr. Ruane, Mr. Greg Rishel, Pennoni Associates, advised members that the applicant is aware of the recommendations submitted by staff. Mr. Jordan Ashburn, Ashburn Homes, indicated no objections to these recommendations. The Committee recommended approval of the Active Recreation Plan Review for The Arbors - 1051 College Road, as recommended by staff. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). Request of Maple Glen Homeowners Association to Amend Active Recreation Area Members were advised that the Planning Office received a letter from the Maple Glen Homeowners Association requesting permission to remove the playground equipment in the subdivision and replace it with a picnic/cook-out area and horseshoe pits. The horseshoe pits are already installed. Because the Active Recreation Area is part of the approved subdivision, the requested change must be reviewed by the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee and ultimately approved by the Planning Commission.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 7 Members were provided a copy of a letter from Ms. Carolyn Akin, Vice-President of the Maple Glen Homeowners Association, explaining the reasons for requesting the amendment to the Active Recreation Area for Maple Glen. On behalf of the Association, Mrs. Laura Shernofsky advised members that the request is being made since the demographics of the neighborhood no longer support the need for the playground equipment for 3-5 year olds and due to the high costs of maintaining the equipment. In its place, she stated that the Homeowners Association would like to create an area for cookouts that would facilitate community gatherings. To this end, the homeowners have already relocated a table and bench to the park area and have voluntarily financed the building and installation of a horseshoe pit adjacent to the table and bench. In addition, Mrs. Shernofsky advised members that the homeowners have discussed the possibility of installing shuffleboard courts when it is financially feasible. She stated that the Maple Glen Homeowners Association requested permission to remove the playground equipment, level and seed the area, and, when their financial situation will allow, install a permanent picnic grill in the area, and she inquired if these changes would suffice as a recreational component for the community. Staff provided members a summary of the Active Recreation Plan that was approved by the Planning Commission as part of the Subdivision Plan in 2002. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, stated that staff supports the request with the stipulation that the homeowners take the actions they have indicated. In response to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Townshend stated that, to her knowledge, this is the first request for an amendment to an Active Recreation Area. She stated that the Dover Code is not prescriptive regarding the handling of changes to approved recreational areas; however, she stated that the Code is specific that such areas are a part of the Subdivision Plan and that homeowners associations are required to maintain these areas in perpetuity. As a result, she felt that it was necessary to bring this request through the process utilized for approval of the Active Recreation Area. Mr. Ruane noted that the demographics of neighborhoods change constantly and, although he understood the reasons for the request, he relayed concern with the lack of guidance for the process and its effect on future neighborhood associations. Responding to Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. Zachery Carter, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that the requirement for maintaining such areas in perpetuity refers to the requirement that the land remain as open space. Clarifying, Mrs. Townshend stated that the Code indicates that improvements are required to be maintained by the homeowners association and does not provide guidance regarding improvements which no longer suit a community’s needs. Mrs. Horsey felt that the Committee should be flexible in allowing homeowners associations to make these types of determinations if they are willing to finance and maintain such changes. She suggested that staff review the Code to determine if an amendment is required. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. Phillip Shernofsky, President of Maple Glen Homeowners Association, stated that the issue was discussed at an annual general membership meeting, which

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 8 was open to all homeowners. At that time, one (1) of the families with younger children suggested the amendment. Mr. Shernofsky assured members that a majority of the homeowners support the proposed amendment. The Committee recommended approval of the request of the Maple Glen Homeowners Association to amend the Active Recreation Area, as stipulated in their letter of request. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). Semi-Annual Report - Statistics Regarding Jobs and Businesses Gained and Lost in the City of Dover Since July 2009 Mr. William Neaton, Economic Development Director, provided an updated report of employment statistics for the 14 largest employers in the Dover area (attachment to Committee minutes) and reminded members that this information is updated and presented to members on a semi-annual basis (the last report was presented on February 22, 2010). Although the unemployment rate throughout the City of Dover has remained constant at 9.5%, Mr. Neaton noted that several employers have increased the number of employees. Mr. McGlumphy requested a more comprehensive report which includes details regarding small businesses, such as the number of businesses opened and closed within the last year. He noted that there are many closed businesses and empty buildings in the downtown area, as well as along Route 13. He suggested that information be provided regarding specific businesses that have closed, as well as new businesses that have taken their places, when applicable, in order to reflect the net result. It was his opinion that, although the report provided to members is helpful, it does not provide an indication of the City’s actions, since the City is not instrumental in the hiring of employees for some of the businesses listed. With regards to the goals and objectives of the Economic Development Office that were provided to members, Mr. McGlumphy noted there is a strong focus on the Downtown Dover Partnership and requested that this focus be expanded outside the downtown area. In response to Mr. Ruane, Mr. Neaton indicated that the City maintains a list of commercial and industrial properties located within the City of Dover. He confirmed that, in addition to monitoring retail vacancies, the Economic Development Office provides updated information to local realtors and works with manufacturers to encourage retaining or relocating businesses in the City. With regards to the Garrison Tract, Mr. Neaton stated that the site plan was near completion. He indicated he was working with Macquarie Energy Limited regarding this matter, would be meeting with State Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) officials for permitting, and had a meeting scheduled with the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) on July 13, 2010. He advised members that he has already met with a professional marketer regarding the development of a marketing plan after the site plan is completed; however,

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 9 he noted that there is limited funding available for this purpose. Once the plan is completed, Mr. Ruane requested that members be provided an opportunity to review it. The Committee recommended acceptance of the Semi-Annual Report - Statistics Regarding Jobs and Businesses Gained and Lost in the City of Dover since July 2009. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). UPDATES The following updates were provided to members: Puncheon Run Watershed Action Team Update Mr. Scott Koenig, Public Services Manager/Director of Public Works, advised members that staff met with the Kent Conservation District and that a grant was obtained from the Clean Water Advisory Council for flood plain work adjacent to the pump station and bridge on Mr. Joseph Petrosky’s property. Staff met with Mr. Petrosky to discuss an overflow channel and redirection of water from Woodbrook into the channel. He assured members that Mr. Petrosky has indicated his concurrence with the project. Mr. Koenig advised members that there is a limited timeline for the first phase of this project due to the expiration of grant funding. He anticipated written correspondence regarding this project within the next 30-45 days. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. Koenig stated that he has requested the inclusion of Puncheon Run flood plain mapping with the project and should know the results within the next couple of months. Planning and Funding for New Library Mr. Zachary Carter, Parks and Recreation Director, reviewed updated information regarding planning and funding for the new library. He reminded members that $2.5M was requested from the State of Delaware Bond Bill. Since a total of $3,284,357 in Bond Bill monies has been received, he stated that only $1.7M will be requested next year, rather than an additional $2.5M. He advised members that fundraising efforts continue to be successful. Responding to Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. Carter indicated that the total project is estimated to cost $22M and that this cost will be updated as the project moves forward. He assured members that costs associated with this project will be monitored closely and that detailed expenditure reports will be provided to members once construction begins. Should there be a shortage in funding, he stated that proposed plans will be presented to the Committee for their review. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, reviewed the report of the Status of FY 2008-2009 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects which was provided to members.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 10 In response to Mr. Ruane regarding the Downtown Dover Partnership Youth Employment Program, Mrs. Townshend stated that grant monies can be carried over to the next fiscal year. Mr. William Neaton, Economic Development Director, projected that funds would be expended by the end of August and relayed that he has requested an extension through that period. Mrs. Townshend assured members that such extensions are typically granted as long as funds are being expended and the extension does not jeopardize the City’s ability to meet the CDBG timeliness standard. Schutte Park Space - Boys and Girls Club/CDSA Mr. Darryl Tingle, Executive Director of the Greater Dover Boys and Girls Club, advised members that, during a recent meeting, Mr. George Krupanski, President and CEO of the Boys and Girls Clubs of Delaware, indicated that the Greater Dover Boys and Girls Club remains committed to building a facility in the Schutte Park area. However, due to the financial issues that many non-profit organizations are currently experiencing, he stated it was not possible to move forward at this time. He noted that a phased-in approach may be possible, if adequate funding is obtained. Mr. Tingle advised members that a retreat for the Greater Dover Boys and Girls Club Board is scheduled for July 29, 2010, and that this issue will be discussed at that time. He assured members they would be kept abreast of this matter. Housing and Recovery Act of 2008 Funds (Neighborhood Stabilization Fund) Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that the City was awarded $1,426,740 for the acquisition and rehabilitation of foreclosed properties. A total of $1,206,990 has been expended on the acquisition of eight (8) properties and renovations for two (2) properties. The remaining balance, in the amount of $232,209, will be utilized for renovations. She indicated that one (1) property has been sold, one (1) property is under contract, and four (4) properties are being renovated. She reminded members that the Dover Community Partnership, the Diamond State Community Land Trust, and the Connections Community Support Program are the three (3) partner agencies that purchased the properties. Comprehensive Plan Implementation Status Report Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, stated that her staff has been focusing on three (3) major projects, including the evaluation and update of Historic District guidelines, development of ordinance amendments for Recreation and Open Space (ROS) Rezoning, and rewriting the environmental protections portion of the Comprehensive Plan. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Townshend stated that there has been minimal negative feedback received from homeowners regarding the proposed ordinance amendments for the ROS Rezoning. She noted that approximately 150 properties within the City would be brought forward for rezoning in conformance with the proposed ordinance amendments and that approximately 3,000 notices were mailed to owners of properties proposed for rezoning and those within 200' of affected areas. The information was also posted on the City website, at the library, and at City Hall. Mrs. Townshend indicated that approximately 150 phone calls were received from the public requesting clarification and that two (2) property owners relayed concerns, one of whom was Mr. Petrosky. She indicated

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 11 that the proposed ordinance has been revised to address Mr. Petrosky’s concerns and will be presented to the Planning Commission for their review and recommendation to City Council. Mr. Jess McVay, 7 McBry Court, stated that, although he resides outside of City limits, due to close proximity, he was provided notification regarding the proposed Recreation and Open Space Ordinance and was present at the meeting in order to get a better understanding of the proposed amendments and their possible effects. Responding, Mrs. Townshend agreed to meet with Mr. McVay following the meeting. Mrs. Townsend noted that staff is working with realtors, homebuilders, the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC), and the Sierra Club to update the environmental protections provisions of the Comprehensive Plan to increase their effectiveness. She anticipated providing the draft to members for their review during the September or October meeting. Youth Advisory Committee Mrs. Russell advised members that the Youth Advisory Committee is on hiatus for the summer and will resume meeting in September. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for acceptance of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Report, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT - JULY 12, 2010 The Utility Committee met on July 12, 2010 with Chairman Ruane presiding. Briefing on State Energy Bills (Consideration of SB 119 Renewable Portfolio Standards was Deferred by Committee on June 28, 2010 Due to Time Constraints) Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, introduced Mr. Patrick McCullar, President and Chief Executive Officer, Delaware Municipal Electric Corporation (DEMEC), and explained that the City is one of nine (9) municipalities in the State of Delaware who are paying members of the Corporation. He stated that one of the functions of DEMEC is to monitor energy related legislation. Mr. McCullar reviewed a presentation of a Summary of Energy Related Legislation Passed by the 145th General Assembly and Effects on Municipal Electric Cooperatives (attachment to committee minutes). In response to Mr. Ruane, Mr. McCullar noted that an analysis has not been performed to determine municipalities’ current progress toward meeting the goals established by the State; however, this will be part of DEMEC’s planning process. In addition, he noted that DEMEC is committed to the offshore wind project planned for the Delaware coast and is doing all it can to encourage moving this project forward. Responding to Mr. Snaman, Mr. McCullar stated that local city and town councils have the option of administering an independent energy plan or charging DEMEC with the responsibility of

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 12 constructing and implementing a plan on their behalf. He suggested that the most efficient approach would be for all nine (9) municipalities to allow the DEMEC Board of Directors (which would include a City of Dover representative) to guide policy decisions and direct DEMEC on implementation. He explained that different municipalities may choose different approaches. Concurring, Mr. DePrima noted that the DEMEC Board has not yet met to determine how the organization will be structured; however, he stated he currently favored learning how administration could be accomplished collectively with other municipalities for greater efficiency and flexibility. He assured Mr. Snaman that the City’s interests as a leader in the field, having instituted a solar project and made a commitment for wind power, would be monitored and protected. Mr. Bonar encouraged Mr. DePrima to pursue additional manufacturing facilities in the area. He felt it important to inform others that green energy is not cheap and will increase the cost of electricity for at least the immediate future. Concurring, Mr. McCullar noted that renewable energy currently is at a premium compared to energy from traditional sources and will be for several years. He stated that, as investments are made, technology will improve, costs of technology will decrease, and at some point parity with carbon- based energy will be achieved. He explained that caps were included in the legislation to avoid extreme run-ups in retail rates in the first five (5) years. Mr. McCullar noted that, in the future, it will be more practical to engage in larger, community-based renewable projects, similar to the Dover SUN Park, rather than small-scale projects. He stated that DEMEC was created by municipalities in 1979 to perform these types of capital finance investments. Mr. McCullar explained that DEMEC has A-rated credit in the financial markets, has bonds that are very much in demand, and obtains the lowest rates possible. He stated that bonds for a $7M substation in the City of New Castle recently sold at 2.92%. Mr. McCullar indicated that allowing DEMEC to finance and build these types of projects can bring value to the enterprise. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. McCullar explained that the Sustainable Energy Utility (SEU) is a quasi-governmental agency created by the legislature several years ago which will have control over a substantial amount of funds and will decide how renewable energy and energy efficiency projects are performed in the State of Delaware. He explained that DEMEC does not have votes on the SEU board at this time; however, the State is creating a renewable energy task force and the municipalities will have a seat on that task force. The task force will be charged with making recommendations on how to best move forward in achieving renewable energy goals and energy efficiency goals in Delaware. Mr. McCullar stated that DEMEC has been assured that the SEU will be listening closely to the recommendations of the task force. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. McCullar noted that Senate Bill 267 addresses solar, wind, biomass, and geothermal renewable energy. Mr. McCullar stated that DEMEC’s goal in considering the legislation is to ensure that provisions are implemented in way that is useful to the State of Delaware but does not cause

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 13 unintended harm to end-use customers. Mr. Ruane commended Mr. McCullar for working with the General Assembly, expressed his appreciation, and stated that the City would continue to cooperate with DEMEC. The Committee recommended acceptance of the report. Mr. Ruane requested that Mr. DePrima and Mr. Ronald Lunt, Public Utilities Manager, provide members an update regarding the implementation of State energy-related legislation at the meeting scheduled for September 27, 2010. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). Review of Utility Related CIP’s (Electric and Water/Wastewater) (Deferred by Committee on June 28, 2010 Due to Time Constraints) Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, stated that the report provided to members reflects the status of projects as of April, 2010. He noted that a number of smaller projects at the Power Plant were completed and several others at the Water/Wastewater Plant were delayed due to financing. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. Lunt stated that the South Governors Avenue project is progressing, water lines are being placed, a cut-in for the hospital was completed during the week of July 5, 2010, and preparations have been completed for putting more facilities on the electric system. In response to Mr. Ruane, Mr. DePrima stated he would inquire as to possible internal problems creating delays for moving the utilities related to construction of the new library. Responding to Mr. Bonar, Mr. DePrima explained that the pumping station situated on the former PW2 property is operated by Kent County. He noted that the City often receives complaints regarding odor in the area, which are forwarded to the County. The Committee recommended acceptance of the report. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). PACE/NAES Monthly Report (May) Members were provided the PACE/NAES Monthly Report for May. The report was provided to allow members the opportunity to monitor what is being sold in electric and the revenues received, which will give members a better understanding of any fluctuations and make improvements if deemed necessary. Although it was not staff’s intention to make a presentation of the reports, they welcomed any questions.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 14 Mr. DePrima noted that May 2010 was a hotter month than normal, resulting in a small amount of energy generation and an $8,700 net value to the City. He noted that the City continues to operate below budget projections for the cost of providing power. He stated that demolition, including removal of old coal chutes, has begun behind the power plant, and expenses for this project were reduced due to the current high cost of metal. He further explained that the project would remove liability due to very old steel structures on the premises and would also free up property for construction in the future. Mr. DePrima also noted that the Power Plant management approached him to discuss the possibility of adding an engineering staffing position to the plant and possibly eliminating an administrative position due to increased demands on power plant operations. He stated that more detailed information on this matter has been requested, and PACE, as the asset manager, will be asked to evaluate the proposal. Mr. DePrima stated that increasing the capacity value of the Combustion Turbine (CT) was being considered. He noted that this matter was discussed previously and not found to be cost effective; however, a cost/benefit analysis utilizing a new technology will be performed. In addition, he noted that PJM is beginning to create a new trading market for Solar Renewable Energy Credits (SREC’s), so the City could trade, buy, and sell SREC’s. In response to Mr. Ruane, Mr. DePrima relayed that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering proposed legislation related to a cap and trade bill, Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) legislation, and regulation of greenhouse gases; however, none of these proposed regulations have been finalized. The Committee recommended acceptance of the PACE/NAES Monthly Reports for May 2010. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). Mr. Ruane noted that Mr. McGiffin would stand in as Committee Chair during his absence throughout the months of July and August. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT - JULY 12, 2010 The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met on July 12, 2010 with Chairman Leary presiding. Review and Recommendation - Filling of Critical Positions During their meeting of February 23, 2009, members recommended approval of the Hiring Freeze for Fiscal Year 2008-2009, but to allow the hiring of critical positions through the review and approval of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee and City Council. It was

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 15 suggested that there be a “standing” agenda item to consider the filling of critical positions and, if there are no positions to consider, the item could be removed. Police Officer Members were reminded that, during their meeting of April 26, 2010, they reviewed a request to recruit for a Police Officer. At that time, members deferred consideration of the request until the incumbent of the position retired. Police Chief James Hosfelt explained that MCpl. Ralph Taylor would be retiring effective July 15, 2010, and reviewed a request to recruit for his replacement. He noted that filling the position is necessary in order for the Department and the City of Dover to remain compliant with the provisions of the Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS) grant, which City Council approved on September 14, 2009. In response to Dr. Jones, Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, stated that the Police Department utilizes a recruiting system that is separate from that used by other City departments. Chief Hosfelt noted that the position would be advertised nationally through several police publications, on the internet, and in newspapers in the Tri-State radius. He explained that the Department has had good results in recruiting officers from other departments in the Tri-State Area in the past. The Committee recommended approval to recruit for the position of Police Officer, as requested. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). Police Dispatcher Chief James Hosfelt reviewed a request to recruit for a Police Dispatcher vacancy created by the sudden resignation of an employee. He noted that the Emergency Dispatch/911 Center is currently manned by ten (10) dispatchers, and the authorized strength of the unit is 11. He explained that the starting salary of the new employee would be approximately $31,000 per year, and that the previous employee, who had over ten (10) years of service, earned approximately $50,000. He noted that procedure for advertising the position would be similar to that used by the Department to recruit for Police Officers. In response to Mr. Salters, Chief Hosfelt explained that, if this position was not filled, the cost of providing overtime pay for current employees to perform this function would exceed the cost of hiring a new employee. He noted that this was the only unit in the City that was not subject to furloughs during FY 2009-2010, due to the emergency nature of the work. He estimated it would take approximately two (2) months to fill the position. In response to Mr. Shevock, Chief Hosfelt stated that Police Officers will not be pulled from their regular duties to cover this position while vacant and indicated that interim duties would be performed by the 911 Manager and other dispatchers.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 16 The Committee recommended approval to recruit for the position of Police Dispatcher, as requested. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). Proposed Resolution in Support of the Local Jobs Act Mayor Carey explained that the National League of Cities has requested support for passage of the Local Jobs for America Act by Congress. Members were provided a sample Resolution expressing support. He stated that he spoke with Mitchel Herckis, Principal Associate for Human Development and Public Safety, National League of Cities, who indicated that the City could receive as much as $3,995,865 per year for two (2) years, if this legislation is passed as written, and would also have the opportunity to apply for $1.2 billion in police hiring grants. He noted that the deadline for submission of a Resolution in support of the Local Jobs for America Act is the end of July. Mr. Ruane stated his support of such a Resolution; however, he suggested that its wording be significantly revised before it is brought to Council for a final vote. Mr. Ruane requested that the document be edited to be “less generic” and more specific to the current economic condition of the City, which he felt to be less severe than indicated in the Resolution. He specifically mentioned that references to “layoffs” did not apply. Mr. Ruane also requested that further information be obtained from the League of Local Governments before the Resolution is presented to Council, including the status of the bill in Congress and the role of the local delegation. Concurring with Mr. Ruane, Mr. Leary noted that references to “firefighters” and “teachers” should be removed from the Resolution. Mr. Hogan concurred with the concept of the Resolution and favored the content of the last two (2) paragraphs; however, he felt Paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 were in need of revision. Mr. Salters stated that he believed this bill had been rejected by Congress to this point; however, the National League of Cities was attempting to garner support for its passage. The Committee recommended to defer consideration of the Resolution until the meeting of July 26, 2010; suggested that Mayor Carey contact Mr. George Wright, Executive Director of the League of Local Governments, to determine the League’s standing on the Local Jobs for America Act and determine if it is still active legislation; and rewrite the Resolution in accordance with the suggestions made by members for discussion at the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting on July 26, 2010, and that, if the deadline is, in fact, the end of July, this item be forwarded to City Council for consideration the same evening due to time constraints. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). (See Agenda Item #7 considered during the latter part of the meeting.)

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 17 Actuary Services Contract - Pension and Other Post-Employment Benefits Mrs. Peggy Teal, Assistant Finance Director, reviewed a request to award a five (5) year contract to Milliman, Inc. for Pension and Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) actuarial and benefits consulting services. She explained that the $62,000 contract would include services to be performed from FY 2011 to FY 2016. Mrs. Teal noted that Milliman was selected because of their ability to perform both types of services requested and their convenient location in Wayne, Pennsylvania. She noted that the Request for Proposal included a provision to have one (1) actuary perform valuation services for both the Pension Plans and OPEB to create efficiency and cost savings in preparing data; previously services of two (2) vendors were used. Mrs. Teal explained that all proposals were reviewed for quality, experience, and qualifications of the firm and its staff, valuation fees, hourly rates, travel, administrative factors, and the amount of experience in the pension and medical benefits fields. In scoring the pricing of the proposals, the hourly rates for consulting services were considered, along with the valuation service fees. She noted that staff felt it was imperative to select a firm that could also meet the future needs of the Health Benefits Committee and provide consultation services at a reasonable overall cost. She indicated that ten (10) proposals were received, all of which indicated good qualifications and experience. A Response Rating Analysis was provided to members. Mrs. Teal noted that there were no local vendor or minority vendor preferences identified nor submitted with these proposals. In response to Mr. Salters, Mrs. Teal indicated that proposals were received from all over the United States. She indicated that Milliman is a national firm that has not previously served the City; however, references were checked and the firm was currently working with the Town of Smyrna. She explained that actuarial services for Pension were previously performed by Al Pike of Pike Associates, who recently retired, and that Nyhart, who was one (1) of the bidders for this proposal, is currently performing these services for OPEB. The Committee recommended that the contract for Pension and Other Post Employment Actuarial Services and Benefits Consulting for FY 2011 - FY 2016, in the amount of $62,000, be awarded to Milliman, Inc. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for acceptance of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT - JULY 26, 2010 Except for the following time sensitive issue, the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report from the meeting of July 26, 2010 will be presented to Council during their Regular Meeting of August 9, 2010 for Council’s review and consideration.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 18 Proposed Resolution #2010-08 in Support of the Local Jobs for America Act During the Committee meeting held earlier this evening, members considered a request for a proposed Resolution in support of the Local Jobs for America Act. It was noted that this matter was considered by members during their meeting of July 12, 2010 and that action was deferred in order to allow time to revise the Resolution and obtain additional information. The committee recommended adoption of Resolution #2010-08 in support of the Local Jobs for America Act. Mr. Leary moved to recommend adoption of Resolution #2010-08 in support of the Local Jobs for America Act, seconded by Mr. McGlumphy and, by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent), Council adopted the following Resolution: A RESOLUTION PROPOSING THE SUPPORT OF THE LOCAL JOBS FOR AMERICA ACT WHEREAS, the City of Dover employs 394 workers in jobs ranging from city administration to trash collection, and public safety; WHEREAS, despite signs of national economic recovery, the City of Dover continues to face significant budget shortfalls due to the loss of revenues from property taxes, construction permits, and real estate transfer taxes; and WHEREAS, the loss of revenues is significant enough that it may force the City of Dover to keep important jobs vacant, including police officers, and others who provide critical services; and WHEREAS, such vacancies contribute to an increase in the lack of fiscal stability for this community, and further contribute to the nation’s unemployment rate just as the economy begins to recover; and WHEREAS, federal aid will be necessary if the City of Dover is to avoid reducing public services, increasing police and other job vacancies, or significant increases in taxes to pay the salaries of these employees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Dover endorses H.R. 4812, the “Local Jobs for America Act,” because it would assist cities across America including Dover, community- based organizations, and private employers to retain and hire new employees; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Dover supports the funding levels proposed in this legislation, including: • $75 billion over two years to local governments and community-based organizations to retain or create public service jobs designed to ensure that city and other services are maintained;

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 19 • $23 billion to local school districts for one year so that they may retain and create up to 250,000 new jobs; • $1.18 billion so that local governments may employ 5,500 new law enforcement and $500 million to retain, rehire, and hire firefighters; and • Funding for 50,000 on-the-job private-sector training positions. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Dover supports H.R. 4812 because it would prevent state and local governments from having to choose between eliminating services and raising taxes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Dover supports H.R. 4812 because it would help stimulate local businesses and create additional jobs in the local economy; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Dover urges Congress and the President to adopt H.R. 4812 into law and fund the provisions outlined in the legislation immediately so that cities and towns across America can retain existing employees and provide employment opportunities in the public and private sectors. ADOPTED: JULY 26, 2010 Mr. Leary moved for acceptance of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). MONTHLY CIP REPORT - MAY 2010 By motion of Mr. Leary, seconded by Mrs. Russell, the monthly CIP Report for May 2010 was accepted by consent agenda (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). Evaluation of Bids - System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Maintenance Contract Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that the Public Utilities Department operates two (2) fixed System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems to monitor and control 14 electric substations, two (2) power generation facilities, 23 water wells, one (1) water treatment plant, and 42 wastewater pumping stations. In addition, he stated that the Public Utilities Department operates the communication system for each location which communicates either through fiber optics or a radio system. Mr. DePrima noted that a SCADA Technician (a City employee) performed this function in previous years; however, when that employee retired, it was decided to disperse the duties of this position to current employees and issue a “support” contract to minimize expenses. Mr. Deprima advised members that the services provided under this contract will include supporting staff members who are responsible for the maintenance and repair of current SCADA components and assisting with the upgrade of obsolete equipment. In addition, he noted that the contractor will assist staff with troubleshooting and repair of the radio/fiber communication system and related components. Mr. DePrima stated that it was determined that this practice should be continued as this method has proven to be cost effective; therefore, proposals were solicited for a SCADA maintenance contract.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 20 Mr. DePrima advised members that request for proposals was advertised by the City’s Contract and Procurement Manager and two (2) responses were received. He stated that the low bid was received from Donovan Contractual Services (DSC) at $50.00 per hour. Mr DePrima explained that by structuring the contract in this form, the City could monitor the expenses and hire an employee if it is economically advantageous. He noted that contract values with DCS for the last two (2) years were $46,558 for FY 2009 and $24,650 for FY 2010 (through May). Staff recommended awarding the contract to Donovan Contractual Services (DCS) for one (1) year with the City’s option to annually extend the contract for a total of three (3) years. Mr. McGlumphy moved for approval of staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). Approval of Contracts - Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) - Municipal Discount Disposal Fee and Recyclable Material Agreements Members were provided a Municipal Discount Disposal Fee Agreement with the Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) for consideration. Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that a coalition of municipalities who contract directly with the Delaware Solid Waste Authority negotiated a new three (3) year contract with DSWA for Municipal Disposal Fees. He explained that DSWA initially proposed charging a higher fee for disposal and rebating excess funds at the end of the year; however, municipalities were successful in negotiating removal of this provision from the contract. The $72.00 per ton fee started on July 1, 2010 and represents a 40% increase over last year’s fee. The fees will increase to $74.00 per ton and $76.00 per ton over the next two (2) years of the contract. The municipalities were not successful in convincing the DSWA to maintain the previous “Dry Waste” fee. All other language is similar to existing provisions. In addition, members were also provided a Recyclable Material Agreement with the DSWA. Mr. DePrima advised members that the municipalities were also able to negotiate free disposal of recyclable material waste for up to six (6) years. He explained that this gives the contracted municipalities even greater assurances than the new Universal Recycling Law provides. Although the municipalities were also able to negotiate a deferred payment plan, Mr. DePrima indicated that there is no advantage to this option since Dover’s budget is done on an accrual basis of accounting. He explained that municipalities that are taking advantage of the deferred payment option use a cash basis budget. Staff recommended that the City Manager be authorized to sign the DSWA Municipal Discount Disposal Fee Agreement and the Recyclable Material Agreement. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mr. DePrima stated that the Universal Recycling Legislation stipulates that the DSWA is mandated to accept recyclables at no charge at their facilities unless private sector facilities are developed. In theory, he explained that if someone were to develop a private recycling facility within a jurisdiction, the DSWA could charge a fee since an alternative option would be available. He reminded members that the Legislation mandated that every service provider offer a recycling program to its customers. He explained that those municipalities that

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 21 utilize a private sanitation service company are not mandated to provide the recycling program; however, the company which the municipality uses for this service will be required to provide recycling. Mr. DePrima confirmed that, as a result of the Legislation, recycling has been mandated to all Delawareans. In response to Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. DePrima indicated that there is not 100% participation in recycling by City residents and that he did not know the percentage of participation at this time. Mr. Salters relayed concerns with the weight of full recycling bins and the difficulty in moving them for collection. Mr. DePrima suggested that anyone wishing to obtain a smaller bin contact the City. Mr. Leary moved to authorize the City Manager to sign the Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) Municipal Discount Disposal Fee Agreement (Exhibit #1) and the Recyclable Material Agreement (Exhibit #2). The motion was seconded by Mr. Salters and carried by a roll call vote of five (5) yes, two (2) no (Mr. McGlumphy and Mrs. Williams), and two (2) absent (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane). HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS/REAPPOINTMENTS Members considered the following appointments to the Human Relations Commission: Appointment Recommended by Mayor Carey - Maisha Britt (To Fill the Expired Term of Brian E. Lewis - Term to Expire February 2013) Mayor Carey requested the appointment of Maisha Britt, to fill the expired term of Brian E. Lewis, for a term to expire February 2013. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the appointments as recommended by Mayor Carey, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). Appointments Recommended by Council President Hogan - Three Year Terms to Expire February 2013 Council President Hogan requested the following appointments for three (3) year terms to expire February 2013: Phyllis Edamatsu (Reappointment) Paul Fleming (Reappointment) Catherine M. Gregory (To Fill the Expired Term of Samuel Hoff) Willie E. Jones (To Fill the Expired Term of Gregory Bunkley) By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the appointments as recommended by Council President Hogan, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 22 Appointment Recommended by Council President Hogan - Anlee Baccio-Walker - Three Year Term to Expire February 2011 (To Fill the Unexpired Term of Saundra Sutton) Council President Hogan requested the appointment of Anlee Baccio-Walker to fill the unexpired term of Saundra Sutton for a three (3) year term to expire February 2011. By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for approval of the appointments as recommended by Council President Hogan, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent). RESOLUTION #2010-06 - AUTHORIZING CONTROLLER/TREASURER AND ASSISTANT TREASURERS TO DISBURSE FUNDS By consent agenda, Mr. Leary moved for adoption of Resolution #2010-06 - Authorizing the Controller/Treasurer and Assistant Treasurers to Disburse Funds. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Russell and, by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent), adopted the following Resolution: WHEREAS, the City of Dover's investment policy includes the investment of funds up to $100,000 per banking institution, investments in the State of Delaware Investment Pool and the purchase and sale of U.S. Treasury and agency securities; and WHEREAS, the banking institutions, brokerage firms, trust companies and other various financial institutions require an Authorizing Resolution for the opening of accounts, and for purchasing, selling, transferring, assigning and handling securities; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the City of Dover, that the Controller/Treasurer and Assistant Treasurers are hereby authorized to open accounts with banking institutions and purchase, sell, transfer assignment and handle securities, and that they are authorized to sign all related forms; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the transactions in these accounts be carried out with any one signature; and That the following are the office holders authorized for these purposes, until further notice: Donna S. Mitchell - Controller/Treasurer Traci A. McDowell - Assistant Treasurer Amber L. Clendaniel - Assistant Treasurer ADOPTED: JULY 26, 2010 FINAL READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE The First Reading of the following Proposed Ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of July 12, 2010.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 23 Proposed Ordinance #2010-22 - Amending Chapter 18 - Animals, Section 18-16 - Keeping of Bees Mr. McGiffin moved that the Final Reading of the Proposed Ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried. By a motion of, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Bonar and Mr. Ruane absent), Council adopted Ordinance #2010-22, as follows: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: That Chapter 18 - Animals - Section 18-1 - Definitions, be amended to read as follows: Sec. 18-1. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Animal includes every living dumb creature, and birds and fowl. Animal abandonment includes completely forsaking or deserting an animal originally under one's custody, without making reasonable arrangements for custody of that animal to be assumed by another person. Animal control officer means a person employed by the city as an enforcement officer, including sworn police officers. Animal shelter and veterinary facility mean any premises so designated by the city for the purpose of impounding and caring for strays, animals found running at-large, or animals in violation of this chapter. Apiary means the assembly of one or more colonies of bees at a single location. At-large means an animal off the premises of the owner and not under the control of a human being either by leash, cord, chain or otherwise. Beekeeper means a person who owns or has charge of one or more colonies of bees. Beekeeping equipment means anything used in the operation of an apiary, such as hive bodies, supers, frames, top and bottom boards and extractors. Colony or hive means an aggregate of bees consisting principally of workers, but having, when perfect, one queen and at times many drones, including brood, combs, honey and the receptacle inhabited of bees.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 24 Cruel includes every act or omission to act whereby unnecessary or unjustifiable physical pain or suffering is caused or permitted. Custody includes the responsibility for the welfare of an animal subject to one's care and control, whether he owns it or not. Domesticated animal means any animal that is accustomed to living in or about the habitation of man, including, but not limited to, cats, dogs, cows, horses, swine and fowl. Food and drink includes providing each animal with daily food and water of sufficient quality and quantity to prevent unnecessary or unjustifiable physical pain or suffering by the animal. Habitable structure means any building or structure used, or intended for use, on a day-to-day basis by people for residential properties, or for purposes of conducting a commercial or industrial business, or for purposes of a similar nature. Honey bee means all life stages of the common domestic honey bee, Apis mellifera species. Nucleus colony means a small colony created from larger colonies Owner means any person, partnership, association, or corporation owning, keeping or harboring a dog or other animal. Any animal shall be deemed to be harbored if it is fed or sheltered for three or more consecutive days. Public nuisance animal means any domestic animal or group of domestic animals which: (1) At-large. Is repeatedly found at-large; (2) Property damage. Damages the property of anyone other than its owner; (3) Interference with persons, vehicles. Molests passersby or chases passing vehicles or bicycles; (4) Noise. Barks, whines or howls in an excessive, continuous or untimely fashion; (5) Odor. Creates an odor which is noxious or offensive, and/or which constitutes a substantial annoyance, convenience or injury to the public; or (6) General welfare. Interferes with the health, comfort, safety or enjoyment of property; offends the sense of decency of the public as a result of unsanitary conditions in the area where such animals are kept; and/or creates a danger to the public health as determined by the state division of public health.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 25 Restraint means when a dog or other animal is controlled by a leash, cord, chain, or under the control of an owner or other responsible person and obedient to that person's commands, or within a vehicle being driven or parked on the street, or within the property limits of its owner or keeper. Shelter includes providing each animal with adequate shelter from the weather elements as required to prevent unnecessary or unjustifiable physical pain or suffering by the animal. Stray means a domesticated animal for which ownership is not established or for which the owner disclaims future responsibility. Super means an additional story on top of a hive. Undeveloped parcel means any land that is not improved or in the process of being improved with habitable structures. Vicious dog or animal means any dog or animal which constitutes a physical threat to a human being or other animal by virtue of attacks of such number and/or severity as to be likely to cause property damage or physical injury. Evidence of a prior instance of an animal biting a human being, without provocation, shall be prima facie evidence that the dog or animal is vicious. This term is further defined in section 18-9(a). Wild animal means any live monkey (nonhuman primate), raccoon, skunk, fox, poisonous snake, boa, python, leopard, panther, tiger, lion, lynx or any other warm-blooded animal which can normally be found in the wild state. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED That Chapter 18 - Animals - Section 18-16 - Keeping Bees, be amended to read as follows: Sec. 18-16. Keeping bees. (a) Notwithstanding compliance with the various requirements of this article, it shall be unlawful for any beekeeper to keep any colony or colonies in such a manner or of such disposition as to cause any unhealthy condition, interfere with the normal use and enjoyment of human or animal life of others or interfere with the normal use and enjoyment of any public property or property of others. (b) Location of beehives from structures and businesses. Beehives for the housing of bee colonies shall not be located closer than 150 feet from residential structures, hospitals, public eateries, churches, offices or schools. (c) Maintenance permitted at educational and farm facilities; exemption. Universities, colleges, museums and farms of two acres or more may maintain hives on their properties in a safe manner, provided that the hives meet a 40-foot setback requirement from buildings

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 26 on adjacent properties. Universities, colleges, museum facilities and farms of two acres or more are exempt from the 150-foot setback requirement for buildings that are located on their properties. (d) Declared nuisance; removal. Any beehive that is declared a nuisance by a majority vote of the city council may be required to be removed or relocated. (e) Hive Registration. All honey bee colonies shall be registered with the State of Delaware Department of Agriculture. (f) Hive Type. All honey bee colonies shall be kept in removable frames, which shall be kept in sound and usable condition. (g) Fencing of flyways. In each instance in which any colony is situated within 25 feet of a public or private property line of the parcel upon which the apiary is situated, as measured from the nearest point on the hive to the property line, the beekeeper shall establish and maintain a flyway barrier at least six (6) feet in height consisting of an opaque wall, fence, dense vegetation or combination thereof that is parallel to the property line and extends 10 feet beyond the colony in each direction so that all bees are forced to fly at an elevation of at least 6 feet above ground level over the property lines in the vicinity of the apiary. It is a defense against prosecution under this section that the property adjoining the apiary tract in the vicinity of the apiary is undeveloped property for a distance of at least 25 feet from the property line of the apiary tract, unless prohibited by the zoning ordinance. (h) Water. Each beekeeper shall ensure that a convenient source of water is available to the bees at all times during the year so that the bees will not congregate at swimming pools, bibcocks, pet watering bowls, bird baths or other water sources where they may cause human, bird or domestic pet contact. (i) General Maintenance. Each beekeeper shall ensure that no bee comb or other materials that might encourage robbing are left upon the grounds of the apiary site. Upon their removal from the hive, all such materials shall promptly be disposed of in a sealed container or placed within a building or other bee-proof enclosure. (j) Queens. In any instances in which a colony exhibits unusual aggressive characteristics by stinging or attempting to sting without due provocation or exhibits an unusual disposition toward swarming, it shall be the duty of the beekeeper to promptly re-queen the colony with another queen. Queens shall be selected from stock bred for gentleness and non-swarming characteristics. (k) Colony Densities. For every two (2) colonies authorized under this section, there may be maintained upon the same tract one nucleus colony in a hive structure with no supers attached, as required from time to time for management of swarms. Each such nucleus colony shall be disposed of or combined with an authorized colony within 30 days after the

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 27 date acquired. It shall be unlawful to keep more than the following number of colonies on any parcel within the city, based upon size or configuration of the parcel on which the apiary is situated: (1) One-quarter acre or less - two (2) colonies (2) More than one-quarter acre but less than one-half acre - 4 colonies (3) More than one-half acre but less than one acre - 6 colonies (4) One acre or larger - 8 colonies (5) Regardless of parcel size, where all hives are situated at least 200 feet in any direction from all property lines of the tract on which the apiary is situated, there shall be a limit of ten (10) colonies. (6) Regardless of parcel size, so long as all property other than the tract upon which the hives are situated, that is within a radius of at least 200 feet from any hive, remains undeveloped parcels there shall be a limit of ten (10) colonies. (l) Inspection. The Department of Inspections shall have the right to inspect any apiary. (m) Violations; penalties. Any person convicted of violating the provisions of this section shall be punished as provided for in Appendix F - Fees and Fines. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED That Appendix F - Fees and Fines, Chapter 18 - Animals - Section 18-16 - Keeping Bees, be amended to read as follows: Sec. 18-16 Keeping bees Subsec. (m) Violations; penalties, for each violation Not less than $25.00 or more than $100.00 ADOPTED: JULY 26, 2010 COUNCIL MEMBERS ANNOUNCEMENTS At the request of Mr. Salters, Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members of an article, “Polluted Water Found Statewide”, that was published in the Wilmington News Journal on July 26, 2010. He stated that the article referred to pollutants leaking from the Dover Gas Light superfund site into the ground water, along with pollution from the old Capital Cleaners site. Mr. DePrima noted that the article mentioned other industrial sites throughout Delaware where groundwater is being polluted. Mr. DePrima explained that the article indicated that the pollutants affect those within one (1) mile of the site and noted that several of the City’s 14 drinking water wells are located within this one (1) mile radius. He stated that, unless the article was read very closely, individuals may be led to believe

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 28 that the City’s public drinking water was being threatened by these pollutants. He assured members that the ground water pollution from the Dover Gas Light superfund site could not intermingle with the City’s water supply. Mr. DePrima advised members that the pollutants are 30 feet below ground and the City’s water wells are 300-500 feet below ground, and more importantly, he stated that these wells are contained in an aquifer topped by a thick layer of clay which protects the water. Mr. DePrima stated that he has confirmed this information with the project manager at the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) and assured members that there are no threats to the City’s water. Mr. DePrima announced that residents will be receiving notices regarding the City’s recycling program. Beginning August 2nd, there will be a new recycling schedule, due to the City’s new contractor. He stated that, although recyclables will be collected the same day that residents’ regular trash is collected, this will only occur every other week. The notices will also be provided to local newspapers. Mrs. Russell advised members of complaints received from residents of West Street regarding flooding that occurred on their street during a recent rainstorm. She suggested that the manholes or catch basins may need to be cleared. In response to Mrs. Russell, Mr. DePrima stated that the City should be able to provide recycling services to all residents, including those residents whose trash is collected through the alleyways. Mrs. Russell moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried. Meeting Adjourned at 8:04 P.M. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All orders, ordinances, and resolutions adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of July 26, 2010, are hereby approved. CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. MAYOR /TM/jg S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Council-Minutes\2010\07-26-2010.wpd Exhibits Attached to Original Minutes and File Copy Exhibit #1 - DSWA Municipal Discount Disposal Fee Agreement Exhibit #2 - DSWA Recyclable Material Agreement

PETITION TO ABANDON PUBLIC STREETS AND ALLEYS before the Dover City Council August 9, 2010 Applicants/Owners: Wesley College Location: See Diagram for Detailed Locations: Area #1 Alley between North Governors Avenue and North New Street from Cecil Street to Fulton Street Area#2 Portion of alley between North Bradford Street and North Governors Avenue, north of Cecil Street Area #3 North Bradford Street between W. Division and Fulton Streets (portions only) Area #4 Fulton Street between North Governors Avenue and North State Street Area #5 Cecil Street between North Governors Avenue and North State (portion only) Area #6 North Bradford Street between Cecil and Mary Streets (portions only) Area #7 Portion of alley between North State Street and North Bradford Street, south of Fulton Street and north of W. Division Street Tax Parcel ID #: No Tax ID – All public right-of-way Present Use: Public Streets Proposed Use: Integration into Walkable Campus Reason for Request: To implement the Wesley College Master Plan’s recommendation for creating a more pedestrian-oriented campus File Number: MI-10-06

Wesley College has requested that the City abandon portions of the following streets and alleys in the vicinity of Wesley College. This request is being made in anticipation of implementation of the Wesley College Master Plan. Existing Property: The subject property consists of public streets, owned and maintained by the City of Dover. The portions of right-of-way requested for abandonment are adjacent on both sides to other properties owned by Wesley College. Fulton and Cecil Streets (Areas # 4 and 5) connect North State Street with North Governors Avenue and are conduits for through traffic between the two roads. The two segments of North Bradford Street (Areas 3 and 6) that are requested for abandonment end at the college. Several alley segments are also proposed to be vacated. See Location listing of Areas #1-7 and the submitted diagram for details. Recommendation of the Planning Staff and Planning Commission: The Planning Staff supports Wesley College’s vision of a pedestrian-oriented campus. To the extent that long-term abandonment of the subject streets will help accomplish this objective, staff supports the conceptual request. Staff believes that if the Planning Commission recommends and City Council approves the requested abandonment, such approval be conditioned on abandonment coinciding with future site plan approval. Because these are public streets that are part of the downtown grid system, staff believes that Wesley and the City should consider the testimony presented by the public on this matter, as well as a phased abandonment. Staff recommendation was presented prior to public comment. Following a public hearing before the Planning Commission on April 19, 2010, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the street and alley abandonment as requested by Wesley College with a vote of 7-0 (with 2 members absent). Staff notes that the Planning Commission motion did not reference the conditions recommended by the Planning Staff. Staff requests that these conditions be addressed in a motion of the Utility Committee. Conditions should be placed as follows: Staff recommends that abandonment be timed such that the City maintain ownership and maintenance of the subject streets and alleys until the Planning Commission approves a site plan for Wesley College that involves the areas to be abandoned. All public electric, water, wastewater, and storm sewer infrastructure must be located within permanent utility easements in accordance with the recommendations set forth in the Public Utilities comments from the DAC report dated April 1, 2010 (attached). An excerpt of the of the Planning Commission minutes is included for your reference: Excerpt from April 19, 2010 Planning Commission Minutes: MI-10-06 Request for Street and Alley Abandonment: Portions of North Bradford Street, Fulton Street, Cecil Street and Alleys - Review and Recommendation to City Council of a request to abandon several improved streets and alleys within the Wesley College Campus limits. The request consists of seven areas: Area #1 – North Governors Avenue Alley West between Fulton Street and Cecil Street; Area #2 – Portion (100 feet) of North Governors Alley West north of Cecil Street; Area #3 – Portion (363 feet) of North Bradford Street south of Fulton Street; Area #4 – Fulton Street between North Governors Avenue and North State Street; Area

MI-10-06 – Street Abandonment Request of Wesley College Report to Dover City Council – August 9, 2010 Page 3 #5 – Portion (443 feet) of Cecil Street east of North Governors Avenue; Areas #6 – Portion (194 feet) of North Bradford Street north of Cecil Street; and Area #7 – Portion (275 feet) of North State Street Alley West south of Fulton Street. This request was filed by Wesley College. Representatives: Mr. Gregg Moore, Becker Morgan Group, Inc.; Dr. William Johnston, President of Wesley College; and Mr. Eric Nelson, Vice President of Wesley College. Mr. Moore stated that the abandonments that they put forward are done as a result of a Master Plan that Wesley College has put together. A rendering was presented at this time. In the foreground of the rendering are the Student Center and possibly a library located on the other side of Governors Avenue from the current campus with a cafeteria meeting area for students. The building located in the background is over by the sporting facilities that would be a performance gymnasium. Occurrences that are now held in the main building would be moved to the sporting facility. This is all part of the Master Plan and they felt it was important that they explain the concept of their Master Plan. The firm that completed the Master Plan recommended that they have a walking campus in the center. To accomplish the walking campus around the main building, the vacation of the two main roads were necessary as well as some of the alleys to make the improvements. This is the first step in securing these City road areas so that plans can be set forth to execute the Master Plan at a later time. Mrs. Townshend provided an overview of the application. Mr. Moore stated that one other point is that Dr. Johnston over the past four months has reached out to a number of homeowners who live directly adjacent to the campus. Last week, they held a neighborhood reach-out meeting hosted on the campus with the neighbors in the surrounding area to provide an update on what Wesley College is doing as well as this project and their Master Plan along with other information regarding the campus. All of the properties that are adjacent to our vacation requests, Wesley College now owns the parcels so we ask for nothing that was not already adjacent on both sides to Wesley College lands. We will have some work to do with the City Public Utilities to provide them access to their utilities and have already started that process. Mr. Hemmig stated that under the Advisory Comments #2 states that “a specific plan to accommodate the displaced parking will be required.” Will this be required at this time or are you talking about in the future? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mrs. Townshend stated that the idea is before the parking is displaced. If you look at the recommendation of the Planning Staff, what they are suggesting is that the abandonment be conditioned upon the actual abandonment coinciding with the future Site Plan approval so that those streets would remain public streets until such time that they need to be altered by Wesley College. Mr. Hemmig further stated that specifically you stated that you met with the residents. Were there any residents that did not appear at the public meeting? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mr. Moore stated that Dr. Johnston has reached out to all of those who are adjacent and then those who he did not reach out to were in the public meeting. For the most part, the folks were very happy with the closure of these streets because there is a conflict with students crossing, students driving, and passing through and there is a safety issue. The other summary is that folks on Bradford Street see the cul-de-sac at the end of Bradford Street of becoming less of a pass through for the College. It then becomes more of a quieter neighborhood. Mr. Hemmig stated on the portion of Bradford Street from Mary Street coming up to Cecil Street this will be a dead end street now. What accommodations have been made for people who live

MI-10-06 – Street Abandonment Request of Wesley College Report to Dover City Council – August 9, 2010 Page 4 there and will now have to turn around as obviously it is not going to be a one way street anymore it will be a cul-de-sac? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mr. Koenig stated that this is a regular thirty-eight (38) foot wide street that was converted to a one way street because of the request from those residents. There will have to be some kind of turn-around afforded to either a full cul-de-sac or some type of modified cul-de-sac or a hammerhead in the design of the campus improvement plans. Mr. Moore stated that the City’s code requires that if there is more than 5,000 square feet of impervious coverage or land disturbance, they would have to come back before this body. Because of the extent of their vacation, they will be back here to show you the walkway, lighting, and landscaping that they will include with the actual closures. When we bring these plans back this is where you would see the cul-de-sacs where we close the street and the cul-de-sac would be accommodated as a part of that plan. Mr. Hemmig stated that currently, the parking access where the tennis courts use to be is off of Fulton Street and Cecil Street. There is no access to Governors Avenue, is that going to change with this Master Plan? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mr. Moore stated that this is where we will have a small access way to access these parking lots. It will likely be on one side so that we would have access in the same location as the current Fulton Street access that is there today. Mr. Tolbert stated with regards to Campus Community School, they still have vehicles that drive in there and drop off students as well as vans. Do you know when Campus Community will be relocating? Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Mr. Moore stated that Wesley College has already notified Campus Community that in the future they will be relocating and Wesley College will take over this building which is a part of their Master Plan. There has been some discussion between Wesley College and the Campus Community School about them moving; however, he does not believe that it is timed in terms of when it is going to happen. Mr. Tolbert further questioned what Campus Community’s view would be regarding Wesley College’s Master Plan? Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Mr. Moore stated that he was not sure what their view was. The movement of the Campus Community School is not a part of these vacations; it is a separate issue between Wesley College and Campus Community School in terms of Wesley College’s growth. They do bring their vans into this area; however, it is not our request to vacate these streets that is requiring that facility to move. He thinks that it is the growth of both facilities that are yielding that. Mr. Moore stated that they have met with the Police Department and they were very happy with this plan because of conflicts, passing through, and safety. Mr. Hemmig questioned if Campus Community School is associated with Wesley College or are they just a tenant renting from Wesley College? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mr. Johnston stated that Wesley College was involved with the charter school in establishing them. We have leased to them a piece of property where they currently use the facility on Bradford Street. We are very supportive of that program; however, there is no obligation or legal responsibility as they are a separate entity. Mr. Hemmig further questioned if the streets would not be changed in use until Campus Community School has left the area? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mr. Moore stated that he is unsure as to whether he could give you a time when we would abandon. If we are successful in gaining ownership, we would have to do some fundraising in order to do these improvements so

MI-10-06 – Street Abandonment Request of Wesley College Report to Dover City Council – August 9, 2010 Page 5 we cannot time when we would close these roadways. The DAC report indicates that Staff would like to see them closed in stages so there is some kind of order and we have agreed to that. He does not feel that the Campus Community School’s decision to relocate and these vacations are as connected as you believe that they are. The Campus Community School is still there and we will not pursue closing down that roadway because their facility would not function without the roadways being there as they have to have access and we understand that. Mr. Hemmig further questioned that if Areas # 3 and #4 would not be closed off for their use until they have left the area? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mr. Moore stated that clearly Area #3 because that is access to the Campus Community parking lot, possibly parts of Area #7 as well as parts of Area #4. Mr. Hemmig further questioned Staff on what they could do to ensure that these streets do not get closed? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mrs. Townshend stated that the Staff recommendation was that the motion be made as such that the abandonment would not take place until there is a Site Plan. That way it gives Wesley College the assurances that they need to go forward and plan; however, still gives the City control of the streets until such time when there is an active application. Mr. Nichols questioned if and when ownership is transferred from the City to Wesley College, how will easements for all of the utilities be handled? Responding to Mr. Nichols, Mr. Moore stated that they would provide easements for all underground and overhead utilities. Mr. Baldwin questioned that once Wesley College takes ownership of these streets, will this hamper the movement of emergency vehicles? Responding to Mr. Baldwin, Mr. Moore stated that they have met with the Police Department and the Fire Marshal’s Office. The plan is that the walkways that we create where the roadways are now would actually be suitable for emergency access. They would use a system of bollards where emergency vehicles could get through; however, the general public cannot flow through. Mr. Holt questioned with regards to parking, a lot of colleges are eliminating freshman from parking and is wondering if you have considered this to help relieve parking? Responding to Mr. Holt, Mr. Moore stated that there are the three things that they are looking at for parking. We are going to eliminate some on-street parking by eliminating the roads. We are growing, students are growing and they are seeing more cars and seeing more students so one option would be to eliminate freshmen from having vehicles on campus. A second option is for them to look at a possible parking garage or some type of facility that would allow us to have central parking closer to the campus. A third option is to expand some of our on-campus lots as has been done over the years such as the tennis courts being turned into a parking lot and perhaps even an off-campus facility parking where students could park and then be shuttled to the central campus. Mr. Tolbert questioned whether Campus Community School received a letter regarding this application tonight? Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Mr. Moore stated that he was unsure. Also responding, Mrs. Townshend stated that they are not legally required so she doubts that it did happen. City Staff took care of public notice for this application and was done through the City Clerk’s Office. We would have notified the adjacent property owners and with Campus Community School not being a property owner, they would not have received notice. Mr. Johnston stated that when he met with a few people their concerns included parking and what they planned to do to alleviate it. Our plan is to move parking away from the center part of the campus. Another person was concerned with big trucks and if they wanted to get through

MI-10-06 – Street Abandonment Request of Wesley College Report to Dover City Council – August 9, 2010 Page 6 the road. With regards to the Campus Community School, he has shared a couple of times the new Master Plan with the chairman. Mr. Friedman opened a public hearing and after seeing no one wishing to speak closed the public hearing. Mr. Nichols moved to forward to City Council approval of MI-10-06 Request for Street and Alley Abandonment: Portions of North Bradford Street, Fulton Street, Cecil Street and Alleys, seconded by Mr. Baldwin and the motion was unanimously carried 7-0 with Mr. Ambruso and Colonel Welsh absent. Advisory Comments to the Applicant: 1. The Planning Commission’s role is to make a recommendation to City Council on the matter. City Council has ultimate authority on the request for abandonment. 2. Staff notes that abandonment of these public streets and subsequent improvements will displace a significant number of existing on-street parking spaces currently utilized by students, staff, employees, and visitors to Wesley College. A specific plan to accommodate the displaced parking will be required to avoid dispersion of the parking into the nearby neighborhood streets. 3. If the request for abandonment is successful and up-front ownership of the areas is desired by Wesley College, additional coordination with various City departments will be necessary to address utility infrastructure access, the need to maintain emergency access, and the development (and approval) of a Record Plan documenting a transfer of ownership and associated infrastructure easements. 4. Abandonment of public streets and alleys does not constitute approval for physical alteration of such streets and alleys. Any modification or ground-disturbing activity must be reviewed through the appropriate site plan process and receive all requisite approvals by regulatory agencies. Attachments: Map Exhibits DAC Agency Comments

C F I I CITY OF DOVER T R Y E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE O M APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY F A R D.A.C. MEETING DATE: D S O H V A E L R APPLICATION: Wesley College Street abandonment FILE #:MI-10-06 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal CONTACT PERSON: David Truax, Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-7011 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: Once streets are closed, need better design information as to size of drive ails that will replace streets. And what means will be used to keep traffic off the closed streets. Show location of FDC’s for each building effected. Project to be completed per approved Site Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: After any application has been approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant has a maximum of thirty (30) days to appeal to the Code Board of Appeals Committee. All comments from this office, approved by the Planning Commission are at the expense of the owner/applicant. The proposed building will be reviewed under Occupancy.

The City of Dover uses the 2003 NFPA Life Safety Code, 2003 IBC, latest editions of all other NFPA Codes and the 2006 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations. The Dover Fire Department request that a 8 ½ X 11 copy of the floor plan and site plan be submitted to Station 1, attention Fire Chief, prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible.

CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: APRIL 1, 2010 APPLICATION: REQUEST FOR STREET & ALLEY ABANDONMENT: PORTIONS OF NORTH BRADFORD STREET, FULTON STREET, CECIL STREET AND ALLEYS FILE #: MI-10-06 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Public Utilities Department CONTACT PERSON: Steve Enss - Electric Sharon Duca, P.E. - Water, Wastewater, Stormwater CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7070 T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER 1. All public electric, water, wastewater and storm sewer infrastructure must be located within a public utility easement or right-of-way. As such the “Recommendations Suggested as Conditions of Approval to Meet Code Objectives” should be required in order to consider the abandonment of the streets and alleys requested by the applicant. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER 1. Permanent public utility easements must be provided to allow for the operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, etc. of all electric, water, wastewater and storm sewer infrastructure. Based upon available records, infrastructure is located within the proposed seven (7) areas as follows: a. Area #1: electric, storm sewer b. Area #2: electric c. Area #3: electric, water, wastewater d. Area #4: electric, water, wastewater (under no means shall the electric lines in the area be relocated underground) e. Area #5: electric, water, wastewater, storm sewer f. Area #6: electric, water, wastewater g. Area #7: electric, wastewater 2. All electric, water, wastewater and storm sewer infrastructure, within each area, shall be field located / verified and surveyed prior to developing the necessary public utility easements. 3. No temporary or permanent structures, including signage or stormwater management areas, shall be placed within the easement areas established. 4. Vehicular access shall be provided to allow for the operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, etc. of all electric, water, wastewater and storm sewer infrastructure.

Request for Street and Alley Abandonment: Portions of North Bradford Street, Fulton Street, Cecil Street and Alleys File #: MI-10-06 April 1, 2010 Page 2 of 2 5. In the event it is determined feasible that any of the utilities could be relocated, the applicant will be responsible for all costs associated with doing so. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT ELECTRIC 1. The Public Utilities Department has pole attachment leases with both phone and cable on some of the phone lines. WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER 1. None. GENERAL 1. It should be noted that other, non-City of Dover utilities may be located within the existing right-of-ways, such as gas and communications, for which the applicant will be required to provide easements and meet other requirements as well. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .

K CITY OF DOVER E C DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE NO D APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY T N I STAFF MEETING DATE: April 1, 2010 S S E T R R V I A C APPLICATION: Road Abandonment Request T T FILE #: MI-10-06 REVIEWING AGENCY: Kent Conservation District I O N CONTACT PERSON: David C. Cahill PHONE #: 741-2600 ext.3 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Kent Conservation District has no objection to the road abandonment of the above referenced site. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: The Following comments are advisory and apply to the development of a detailed site plan for this project. • A detailed Sediment and Stormwater Management Plan must be approved by our office prior to any land disturbing activity (i.e. clearing, grading, filling, etc.) over 5000 square feet.

CITY OF DOVER D E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE L APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D O D.A.C. MEETING DATE: March 30, 2010 T =============================================================== APPLICATION: Request for Street and Alley Abandonment: Portions of North Bradford Street, Cecil Street, and Alleys FILE#: MI-10-06 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT CONTACT PERSON: Julio F. Seneus PHONE#: 760-2145 =============================================================== THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The applicant will need to work and coordinate with DelDOT on a study of the streets and alleys closings. The applicant will need to provide the necessary traffic counts to DelDOT in order to create a Synchro Model of the streets and alleys closing for analysis and impact in the area. The result of the improvements contained in the study will be implemented per DelDOT's discretion. Please, contact Mr. Bruce Allen at (302) 760-2135 or via e-mail at Bruce.Allen@state.de.us to coordinate the basis and criteria of the analysis. 2. No direct access will be granted to the individual parcels on S. Governors Avenue and S. State Street, which will be affected by the streets and alleys closings. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person and the planning department as soon as possible.

August 1, 2010 Dear Mayor Carey and City Councilmen: Please consider my comments as you decide on the merits of approving the Wesley College concept plan developed by the firm of Becker Morgan Engineers and Architects. As a member of the Friends of Historic Camden, active participant in the Friends of Old Dover, and as a professional engineer involved with transportation and other public works, I would like to lend my support for creating a more integrated, pedestrian friendly environment on the Wesley College campus. Wesley College is unquestionably an important and historical asset to the Dover area. The main elements of the concept plan involve dosing Fulton and Cecil streets to through traffic in order to create a safer and more pedestrian friendly environment. More than a transportation matter, such environments are conducive to a sense of community and enhance the learning experience. If Wesley can successfully address the concerns already raised by the desired changes, then I believe the plan will have long lasting benefit to the college and surrounding community. Having endorsed the plan in concept, I would recommend study to better determine the consequences of traffic diversions. My sense is that this will not reveal any major shortcomings, but it may warrant some modification to the concept or the transportation network in the vicinity. I also suggest providing interconnections between parking lots where possible in order to have better parking search. Doing so may also permit reducing paved areas in cul-d-sacs, without compromising the goals of the plan. I hope you will give positive consideration and approve this long term plan. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. a;~~ Charles Altevogt, P.E.

Clendaniel, Amber From: Townshend, Ann Marie Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 3:37 PM To: City Clerks Office Subject: FW: Pedestrian Project Petition for Wesley College Attachments: Pedestrian_Projec1.docx; 2009132-AERIAL_06-16-10.pdf; 2009132-CONEPTUAL-MASTER- PLAN_06-16-10.pdf Ann Marie Townshend, AICP Director, Planning & Community Development City of Dover From: Still Insurance Agency [mailto:dfggroup@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 2:26 PM To: DePrima, Tony; Townshend, Ann Marie; Williams, Beverly C. Cc: greaterdovercommittee@comcast.net; jph@fawcasson.com; lsh@fawcasson.com Subject: Fwd: Pedestrian Project Petition for Wesley College As a member of the GDC and long time Dover resident I support the Wesley College Pedistrian plan. Sincerely, John C. Still Still Insurance Agency DFG, Inc. www.stillinsuranceagency.com P: (302) 734-4448 F: (302) 734-3402 -----Original Message----- From: Shelly Cecchett <greaterdovercommittee@comcast.net> To: Robert C. MacLeish <rmacleish@lhconstruction.com>; Michael J. Malkiewicz, Esq. <mjm@bmmt-law.com>; William N. Johnston <wnj@wesley.edu>; Hon. Carlton Carey <ccarey@dover.de.us>; Dr. Michael Thomas <mthomas@capital.k12.de.us>; Michael S. Koppenhaver <michael_S_Koppenhaver@ml.com>; Charles C. Rodriguez <CCRod1@aol.com>; John McKown <JMcKown@delaware.net>; Rebecca Kidner <rbk@kidner.com>; Michael J. Petit de Mange <michael.petitdemange@co.kent.de.us>; Glenn Mandalas <glenn@bairdmandalas.com>; Frank Fantini <ffantini@fantiniresearch.com>; Wm. H. Willis, Jr. <bill@willisgm.com>; Beverly C. Williams <bev4444@comcast.net>; E. Bradford Bennett <bbennett@dmv.com>; Patricia Key <pkey@harringtonraceway.com>; Brooks Banta <pbanta@aol.com>; J. William Andrew <BAndrew@decoop.com>; George M. Records Jr. <gmrecords@verizon.net>; Kevin Ripley <Kevin.Ripley@kraft.com>; Kevin Nemith <kevin@cncinsurance.com>; Robert Duncan <ecoopdog@aol.com>; Dr. Dianne Sole <dsole@polytech.k12.de.us>; Sean Mercer DDS <seanmercer13@gmail.com>; Ralph Adkins <radkins@chpk.com>; Dennis E. Klima <wendy_brown@bayhealth.org>; Thomas J. Burns <tburns@burnsandellis.com>; Bill Strickland <wstrickland@lwinsurance.com>; Beth B. Miller <bmiller@morrisjames.com>; Judy Diogo <jdiogo@cdcc.net>; John Still, RHU <dfggroup@aol.com>; LD Shank III <shankld@aol.com>; William Neaton <wneaton@dover.de.us>; Kevin Fitzgerald <kevin.fitzgerald@cr.k12.de.us>; Melville F. Warren, Jr. <mel@pfisterins.com>; Glenn A. Courtney <shademaker33c@comcast.net>; R. Thomas Worley <tom_worley@cable.comcast.com>; William Holden <wfhdodge1@aol.com>; Dave McGuigan <dmcguigan@geolyn.com>; Eric Simmons <esimmons7@comcast.net>; Tony DePrima <tdeprima@dover.de.us>; Gerard L. Esposito <jesposito@tuiwater.com>; Wayne Holden <wayneholden77@comcast.net>; Jennings Hastings <jph@fawcasson.com>; Michael B. Gast <mgast@wilmingtontrust.com>; Daniel L. Simpson <dsimpson@dtcc.edu>; 1

Charlie H. Sterner, Jr. <csterner@juds.com>; Donna Stone <donna.stone@yesbank.com>; Ed Dulin <Ed0783@aol.com>; Robert Edgell <redgell@tealconstruction.com>; Eric Schaeffer <eric@advantechsecurity.net>; Raymond F. Book, III CPA <rbook@rfbookcpas.com>; Alan Kovitz <alan@elevationsunlimited.us>; Lynne Schaefer <lschaefer@wsfsbank.com>; Victor Schimp <vschimp@sheratondover.com>; Gregory V. Moore <gmoore@beckermorgan.com>; Denis McGlynn <dmcglynn@doverdowns.com>; David Clendaniel <davidcl@doverfcu.com>; Valentino P. DeRocili <vderocili@compliancecanhelp.com>; Audrey Ellen Brodie <audrey@FirstClassProperties.us>; Daniel W. Wolfensberger <wolfyCH@aol.com>; Joshua Twilley <jtwilley@incserve.com>; Mark Carlson <markc@martelinc.com>; Randal Bright <Nora.Gleadow@dover.af.mil>; Col Manson O. Morris <betty.vane@dover.af.mil>; Lee Beetschen, P.E., DEE <ljb@cabe.com>; Bradley S. Eaby <bradeaby@verizon.net>; John Paradee Esq. <'jwparadee@prickett.com>; Mark F. Dunkle, Esquire <mdunkle@pgslegal.com>; Michelle Taylor (mtaylor@uwde.org) <mtaylor@uwde.org>; Paradee Esq. <jwparadee@prickett.com> Sent: Thu, Jul 22, 2010 10:30 am Subject: Pedestrian Project Petition for Wesley College Good Morning, On July 16, 2010, the Greater Dover Committee Executive Board voted to support Wesley’s College's Petition to the City of Dover to become a Pedestrian Campus. We are now seeking a vote from the full membership via email. Your prompt attention is critical! Wesley plays a very important role in the economy in Central Delaware by providing a quality education which is known all over the east coast, and by being productive partners with the Dover community through their support of projects and events. Please review the attached documents which outline the project. Please be aware that Wesley owns both sides of the street of the proposed road closures. * If you look at the aerial view which is the first pdf you will see the closure of roads which are indicated in yellow - part of N. Bradford, Fulton and Cecil Streets. In the second pdf if shows the concept of the walking areas which will allow for safe and open flow for the students. (Look at the area between State Street and Governors Avenue – you will see the roadways being removed and green space and sidewalks being outlined.) There will be a public hearing regarding their request on Monday, August 9th, at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall. GDC members are encouraged to attend and speak in support of this project. Please let me know if you will be able to attend. If you have questions or comments, please email me or Dr. Johnston can be reached at 736-2508. Again, we are asking members to email their vote to support the Wesley College Petition to the City of Dover to become a Pedestrian Project. Thank you for your prompt attention. Shelly Cecchett Executive Director Greater Dover Committee (302) 632-9426 Cell (302) 734-2513 Office (302) 734-4630 Fax www.greaterdovercommittee.org <2009132-AERIAL_06-16-10.pdf><2009132-CONEPTUAL-MASTER-PLAN_06-16-10.pdf><Pedestrian Projec1.docx> = 2

Pedestrian Project: Reasons for the project Reasons for the project: • To continue to attract students, Wesley needs to be able to compete with other campuses. Making the campus pedestrian friendly enables the College to more effectively complete with campuses that have large dedicated green spaces in which students and guests can walk, sit, and read uninterrupted by vehicular traffic . Making Wesley pedestrian friendly will make it feel more like “an actual campus”. • Safety of pedestrians on campus. Greatly reduces the safety hazard of having approximately 1,500 students crossing these streets several times a day . • Eliminates through traffic on Fulton and Cecil Streets • Will create a greater sense of campus community and will assist in bringing greater definition to the campus • It enables the campus to become “green” in that it is not catering to automobiles but to pedestrians • Reduces problems with the Fulton Street /Delaware Avenue intersection • Promotes a pedestrian corridor to downtown Dover along Bradford Street • Reduces the number of “ undesirables” who currently have vehicular access to campus 6/20/10

June 27, 2010 Dr. Dr. Johnson: Thank you for sharing your vision of the concept plan developed by the firm of Becker Morgan Engineers and Architects. As a member of the Friends of Historic Camden, active participant in the Friends of Old Dover, and as a professional engineer involved with transportation and other public works, I would like to lend my support for creating a more integrated, pedestrian friendly environment on the Wesley College campus. Wesley College is unquestionably an important and historical asset to the Dover area. The main elements of the concept plan involve closing Fulton and Cecil streets to through traffic in order to create a safer and more pedestrian friendly environment. More than a transportation matter, such environments are conducive to a sense of community and enhance the learning experience. If Wesley can successfully address the issues already raised by the desired changes, then I believe the plan will have long lasting benefit to the college and surrounding community. Having endorsed the plan in concept, I would recommend study to better determine the consequences of traffic diversions. My sense is that this will not reveal any major shortcomings, but it may warrant some modification to the concept or the transportation network in the vicinity. I also suggest providing interconnections between parking lots where possible in order to have better parking search. Doing so may also permit reducing paved areas in cul-d-sacs, without compromising the goals of the plan. I hope you are successful in gaining approval of this long term plan. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Charles Altevogt, P.E.

City of Dover MAYOR AND COUNCIL DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2010-07 1 A RESOLUTION VACATING AND ABANDONING A CERTAIN ALLEYS AND STREETS SITUATED IN 2 THE CITY OF DOVER. 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 4 Section 1. The Council of the City of Dover hereby vacates and abandons the following streets and alleys: 5 Area #1 The 100 block of North Governors Avenue Alley West, being all that certain piece or parcel 6 of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware, being an improved 7 public alley running north to south between Cecil Street and Fulton Street, lying on the 8 westerly side of and running parallel to North Governors Avenue, said alley being 10 feet 9 wide and approximately 341 feet in length and comprised of 3,410 square feet, more or less. 10 11 Area #2 The southern portion of the 200 block of North Governors Avenue Alley East, being all that 12 certain piece or parcel of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware, 13 being an unimproved public alley running north to south, said portion of alley located 14 between Mary Street and Cecil Street but not adjacent to and lying on the easterly side of 15 and running parallel to North Governors Avenue, unimproved alley being a varying width 16 (10-15 feet) and approximately 100 feet in length, comprised of 3,410 square feet, more or 17 less. The portion of the alley is located approximately 173 feet east of the center of 18 Governors Avenue and 302.6 feet south of the southerly right of way line of Mary Street to 19 the point of beginning, thence extending approximately 100 feet in a southerly direction and 20 terminating at lands of Wesley College. 21 Area #3 A portion of the unit block of North Bradford Street, being all that certain piece or parcel 22 of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware, said portion of street 23 commencing at the southerly side of Fulton Street and running south toward Division Street 24 but not adjacent to, being 60 feet wide and approximately 363 feet in length, comprised of 25 approximately 21,600 square feet (0.496 acres). The portion of said street starting at the 26 southern right of way of Fulton Street and extending approximately 363 feet in a southerly 27 direction to the northerly right of way line of an unnamed alley. 28 Area #4 The unit block of Fulton Street, being all that certain piece or parcel of land situated in the 29 City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware, a public street running east to west between 30 South Governors Avenue and North State Street and being 60 feet wide and approximately 31 680 feet in length, comprised of 40, 800 square feet (0.936 acres) more or less. 32 Area #5 A portion of the unit block of Cecil Street, being all that certain piece or parcel of land 33 situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware, said portion of street 34 commencing at the easterly side of South Governors Avenue and running east towards North 35 State Street but stopping short of, being 60 feet wide and approximately 443 feet in length 36 comprised of 26,580 square feet (0.61 acres) more or less. The portion of said street, 37 starting at the easterly right of way line of North Governors Avenue extending 443 feet east 38 to a point approximately 90' east of the easterly right of way line of North Bradford Street. P.O. Box 475 ˜ Dover, Delaware ˜19903 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2010-07 PAGE 2 39 Area #6 A portion of the 200 block of North Bradford Street, being all that certain piece or parcel 40 of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware, said portion of street 41 commencing at the northerly side of Cecil Street and running north toward Mary Street but 42 stopping short of and being 60 feet wide and approximately 194 feet in length comprised of 43 11,650 square feet (0.267 acres) more or less. 44 Area #7 The northern portion of the unit block of North State Street Alley West, being all that certain 45 piece or parcel of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware, an 46 improved public alley running north to south, said portion of alley being between Fulton 47 Street and West Division Street but not adjacent to and lying on the westerly side of and 48 running parallel to North State Street, being 17 feet wide improved alley and approximately 49 275 feet in length, comprised of 4,675 square feet, more or less. The portion of said alley 50 being located approximately 221 feet west of the centerline of North State Street, starting 51 at the southern right of way line of Fulton Street extending approximately 275 feet in a 52 southerly direction to the northerly property line of lands now or formerly of Francis A. 53 Stratford. 54 Section 2. Since no person has been deprived of property by the vacating and abandoning of the aforesaid streets and 55 alleys, no compensation is awarded. 56 Section 3. The City shall retain a utility easement for the entire length and width of the aforesaid streets and alleys 57 and all costs of conveyance shall be borne by the property owners. 58 Section 4. This resolution shall be effective upon the filing of a revised plot plan of the aforesaid streets and alleys. 59 ADOPTED: * 60 S:\RESOLUTIONS & PROCLAMATIONS\2010\DRAFT\Res. No. 2010-07 - Abandonment of Streets and Alleys - Wesley College.wpd 61 62 CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. KENNETH L. HOGAN 63 MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT 64 Actions History: 65 August 9, 2010 - Introduced at City Council

PETITION TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT Public Hearing before the Dover City Council August 9, 2010 Proposed Zoning Change: Amendment to Zoning Ordinance, Article 9 – Board of Adjustment, to bring the City’s code in line with State statute as it relates to the role of the Board of Adjustment and legal standards for granting variances. Summary of Amendment: Staff developed the proposed ordinance following training provided to the Board of Adjustment and Planning Staff regarding Board of Adjustment case law and State statute requirements. The proposed amendment would bring the City’s code requirements relating to the Board of Adjustment into compliance with State statutory requirements and case law precedence. Planning Commission Recommendation: Following a public hearing before the Planning Commission on July 19, 2010, where no members of the public spoke in favor or in opposition to the proposed zoning text amendment, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the proposed text amendment (7-0, with two members absent). Attachments: Draft Ordinance Ordinance Number: 2010-18 File Number: MI-10-12

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-18 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN 2 COUNCIL MET: 3 4 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 9 – Board of Adjustment, be amended by inserting the text 5 indicated in blue, bold, italics and delete the text indicated in red, bold, strike-through, as follows: 6 7 ARTICLE 9. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 8 9 Section 1. Creation, appointment and organization. 10 11 There shall be a board of adjustment pursuant to the provisions of chapter 3 of title 22, 12 Municipalities, of the Delaware Code Annotated (22 Del. C. § 301 et seq.). 13 14 Section 2. Powers and duties. 15 16 The board of adjustment shall have all the powers and duties prescribed by law and by 17 this ordinance, which are more particularly specified as follows, provided that none of the 18 following provisions shall be deemed to limit any power of the said board that is conferred by 19 law: 20 21 2.1 Interpretation. On appeal from an order, requirement, decision or determination 22 made by an administrative official, or a request by any official, board or agency of the 23 city, to decide any of the following questions: 24 25 2.11 Determination of the meaning of any portion of the text of this ordinance 26 or of any condition or requirement specified or made under the provisions of 27 this ordinance. 28 29 2.12 Determination of the exact location of any district boundary shown on the 30 zoning map. 31 32 2.2 Variances. To authorize, upon appeal in specific cases, such variance from the 33 terms of this ordinance, other than variance of any use regulations, except a variance 34 permitting addition to or extension of an existing nonconforming use of a more 35 restrictive nature than the conforming use in the area as will not be contrary to the 36 public interest where, owing to exceptional and extraordinary circumstances, there are 37 practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in the way of carrying out of the strict 38 letter of this ordinance, subject to terms and conditions to be fixed by the board; 39 provided, however, that no such variance shall be granted unless the board finds: 40 41 (a) That there are physical conditions, fully described in the findings of 42 the board, applying to the land or building for which the variance is 43 sought, which conditions are peculiar to such land or building, and have 44 not resulted from any act of the applicant or any predecessor in title; 45 and 46

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-18 PAGE 2 47 (b) That, for reasons fully set forth in the findings of the board, the 48 aforesaid circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application 49 of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of all 50 reasonable use of such land or building and the granting of the variance 51 is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building, and that the 52 variance as granted by the board is the minimum variance that will 53 accomplish this purpose; and 54 55 (c) That the granting of the variance under such conditions as the 56 board may deem necessary or desirable to apply thereto will be in 57 harmony with the general purpose and intent of this ordinance, will not 58 represent a radical departure therefrom, will not be injurious to the 59 neighborhood, will not change the character thereof and will not be 60 otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 61 62 2.21 The needs or desires of a particular owner or tenant or of a particular prospective 63 owner or tenant shall not, either alone or in conjunction with other factors, afford any 64 basis for the granting of a variance. The fact that the improvements already existing 65 at the time of the application are old, obsolete, outmoded or in disrepair, or the fact 66 that the property is then unimproved, shall not be deemed to make the plight of the 67 property unique or to contribute thereto. 68 69 2.22 Where the board finds the zoning classification of a particular property to be 70 conducive to the deprivation of all reasonable use of the land or building by the owner 71 thereof, and where the board deems the same condition to apply generally to other land 72 or buildings in the same neighborhood or zone, the said board may call this condition 73 to the attention of the planning commission for recommending amendment to the 74 zoning ordinance. 75 76 2.23 In all cases where the board of adjustment grants a variance from the strict 77 application of the requirements of this ordinance, it shall be the duty of such board to 78 attach conditions and safeguards as may be required in order that the result of its 79 action may be as nearly as possible in accordance with the intent and purposes of this 80 ordinance. 81 82 2.24 Whenever the board of adjustment denies an application for variance, such 83 application for variance, or an application on the same property which is substantially 84 similar, shall not be accepted for reconsideration by the board of adjustment sooner 85 than one year from the date of denial. 86 87 The board of adjustment shall have the powers and duties as specified in Delaware Code 88 Annotated (22 Del. C. § 301 et seq.) and as articulated below: 89 90 2.1 Variance – The board shall have the authority to authorize variances from provisions 91 of the zoning ordinance that are not contrary to public interest where the board 92 determines that a literal interpretation of the zoning ordinance would result in undue 93 hardship or exceptional practical difficulties to the applicant. In granting variances, the 94 board shall determine that the spirit of the zoning ordinance is observed and substantial 95 justice done.

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-18 PAGE 3 96 2.11 Area Variance. A variance shall be considered an area variance if it relates to bulk 97 standards, signage regulations, and other provisions of the zoning ordinance that address 98 lot layout, buffers, and dimensions. In considering a request for an area variance, the 99 board shall evaluate the following criteria and document them in their findings of fact: 100 101 (a) the nature of the zone in which the property lies; 102 103 (b) the character of the immediate vicinity and the contained uses therein; 104 105 (c) whether, if the restriction upon the applicant’s property were removed, such 106 removal would seriously affect neighboring properties and uses; and 107 108 (d) whether, if the restriction is not removed, the restriction would create 109 unnecessary hardship or exceptional practical difficulty for the owner in his 110 efforts to make normal improvements in the character of that use of the property 111 that is a permitted use under the provisions of the zoning ordinance. 112 113 2.12 Use Variance. A variance shall be considered a use variance if it would permit a use 114 of the subject property that would otherwise not be permitted on the subject property. In 115 considering a request for a use variance, the board shall determine that the following 116 criteria exist and document them in their findings of fact: 117 118 (a) That there are physical conditions applying to the land or building for which 119 the variance is sought, which conditions are peculiar to such land or building, and 120 have not resulted from any act of the applicant or any predecessor in title; and 121 122 (b) That the aforesaid circumstances or conditions are such that the strict 123 application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of all 124 reasonable use of such land or building and the granting of the variance is 125 necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building, and that the variance as 126 granted by the board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; 127 and 128 129 (c) That the granting of the variance under such conditions as the board may 130 deem necessary or desirable to apply thereto will be in harmony with the general 131 purpose and intent of this ordinance, will not represent a radical departure 132 therefrom, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, will not change the character 133 thereof and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 134 135 2.2 Appeal of administrative order, requirement, decision, or determination – The board shall 136 have the authority to hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is any order, requirement, 137 decision or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement of the zoning 138 ordinance. Appeals to the board may be made by any person aggrieved or by any officer, 139 department, board or bureau of the municipality affected by any decision of an administrative 140 officer. 141 142

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-18 PAGE 4 143 Section 3. Procedure. 144 145 The powers and duties of the board of adjustment shall be exercised in accordance with the 146 following procedure: 147 148 3.1 The board of adjustment shall not decide upon any appeal for interpretation or 149 variance without first holding a public hearing, notice of which hearing and of the substance 150 of the appeal or application shall be given by publication in the official newspaper of the city 151 at least ten days before the date of such hearing. In addition to such published notice, the 152 board of adjustment shall cause notice to be given of the substance of every appeal for a 153 variance, together with notice of the hearing thereon, by causing notices thereof to be mailed 154 by postal card or other means at least ten days before the date of said hearing to the owners 155 of all property abutting that held by the applicant in the immediate area (whether or not 156 involved in such appeal) and all other owners within 200 feet, or such additional distance as 157 the board of adjustment may deem advisable, from the exterior boundaries of the land 158 involved in such appeal, as the names of said owners appear on the last completed 159 assessment roll of the city. Any or all of the notices required by this [sub]section shall be 160 issued by the office of the city clerk city planner on order of the board of adjustment or 161 upon order of the chairperson of said board if the appeal is received when the board is not 162 in session and the chairperson deems it necessary or desirable to expedite the public hearing 163 on such appeal. Provided that due notice shall have been published as above provided and 164 that there shall have been substantial compliance with the remaining provisions of the 165 paragraph [subsection], the failure to give notice in exact conformance herewith shall not 166 be deemed to invalidate action taken by the board of adjustment in connection with the 167 granting of any appeal or variance. 168 169 3.2 If the land involved in an appeal or application lies within 500 feet of the boundary of 170 any other incorporated municipality, the city clerk city planner shall also transmit to the 171 municipal clerk of such other municipality a copy of the official notice of the public hearing 172 thereon not later than the day after such notice appears in the official newspaper of the city. 173 174 3.3 At least ten days before the date of any public hearing, the secretary of the board 175 of adjustment shall transmit to the secretary of the planning commission a copy of any 176 appeal or application, together with a copy of the notice of such hearing. The planning 177 commission may submit to the board of adjustment an advisory opinion on said appeal 178 or application at any time prior to the rendering of a decision.3.4 179 180 3.4 3.3 Unless work is commenced and diligently prosecuted within one year of the date of 181 the granting of a variance, such variance shall become null and void. 182 183 3.5 3.4All appeals and variance applications and appeals made to the board of adjustment 184 shall be in writing, on forms prescribed by the board and approved by the planning 185 commission. All variance requests and appeals from an order, requirement, decision or 186 determination made by an administrative official, board or agency of the city for 187 residential uses shall be accompanied by a fee as provided for in Appendix F--Fees and 188 Fines. All variance requests for nonresidential uses shall be accompanied by a fee as 189 provided for in Appendix F--Fees and Fines. All appeals from an order, requirement, 190 decision or determination made by an administrative official, board or agency of the 191 city shall be accompanied by a fee as provided for in Appendix F--Fees and Fines. The

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-18 PAGE 5 192 board of adjustment may, in its discretion, return to the applicant part or all of the fee paid 193 by him in the event that his appeal under section 2.2 Appeal of administrative order, 194 requirement, decision, or determination 2.1 (interpretation) hereof is partially or wholly 195 successful. The fees filed in connection with applications under section 2.1 Variance 2.2 196 (variances) shall not be returnable, regardless of disposition of the case by the board. 197 198 3.6 3.5 Each appeal or variance application or appeal shall fully set forth the circumstances 199 of the case. Every appeal or variance application or appeal shall refer to the specific 200 provision of the ordinance involved, and shall exactly set forth, as the case may be, the 201 interpretation that is claimed, the details of the variance that is applied for and the grounds 202 on which it is claimed that the same should be granted. 203 204 3.7 3.6 Every decision of the board of adjustment shall be recorded in accordance with 205 standard forms adopted by the board, and shall fully set forth the circumstances of the case 206 and shall contain a full record of the findings on which the decision is based. Every decision 207 of the board shall be by resolution and each such resolution shall be filed by case number, 208 together with all documents pertaining thereto. The board of adjustment shall notify the 209 city planner, each member of the city council, and the chairperson of the planning 210 commission in Dover, and the municipal clerk of any affected municipality given notice 211 of hearings as set forth in [sub]section 3.2 of its decision in each case. 212 213 3.8 3.7 All the provisions of this ordinance relating to the board of adjustment shall be 214 strictly construed. The board, as a body of limited jurisdiction, shall act in full conformity 215 with all provisions of law and of this ordinance and in strict compliance with all limitations 216 contained therein; provided, however, that if the procedural requirements set forth in this 217 ordinance have been substantially observed, no applicant or appellant shall be deprived of 218 the right of application or appeal. 219 220 3.8 Whenever the board of adjustment denies an application for variance, such application 221 for variance, or an application on the same property which is substantially similar, shall 222 not be accepted for reconsideration by the board of adjustment sooner than one year from 223 the date of denial. 224 225 226 ADOPTED: * 227 228 229 SYNOPSIS 230 The proposed ordinance brings the City’s code provisions governing Board of 231 Adjustment into conformance with State statutes and case law. 232 233 234 Actions History: 235 June 28, 2010 - First Reading 236 June 14, 2010 - Introduced in Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee

Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: Recreational and Open Space (ROS) Rezoning MI-10-11 List of Packet Items: • Summary o Background on Project o Chronology of Events o Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance: Proposed Ordinance #2010-21 (First Reading) • Recreational and Open Space Zone o Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 Section 30 Recreational and Open Space Zone (ROS) • Exhibit Maps o Overall Map o Exhibit Map Set (A-I) • Summary Table Listing of Properties for Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS Rezoning • Comments o Letters and Correspondence Received • Planning Commission Minutes o Excerpt of Draft Meeting Minutes from the July 19, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting • Zoning Map Book o Draft Zoning Map Book Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS, dated August 9, 2010

City of Dover Comprehensive Rezoning 2010 – ROS Rezoning Background on Project On February 9, 2009, Dover City Council adopted the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. State law (Del. Code, Title 22, Section 702) requires that within 18 months of adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, municipalities rezone lands in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to being a requirement of State law, this ensures that the City’s zoning map is an effective tool in reaching the goals set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. (See Chapter 15: Implementation.) The bulk of the necessary rezoning was accomplished with the 2009 Comprehensive Rezoning Project, where the City proactively rezoned over 280 parcels of land city-wide in accordance with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The 2009 Comprehensive Rezoning Project was accompanied by a series of amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, which essentially corrected errors that were identified during the process of the 2009 Comprehensive Rezoning Project. Dover City Council adopted the 2009 Comprehensive Rezoning Project and 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments on November 23, 2009. The Chapter 12: Land Development Plan (including Map 12-1: Land Development Plan) of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan identified a number of areas as Open Space in terms of land use and articulated an overall land use policy for these areas. The Land Development Plan also indicated that once an open space zone was developed, some areas shown as Open Space would be rezoned to this new classification. Following completion of the 2009 Comprehensive Rezoning Project, the Planning Staff began to develop a new Recreational and Open Space Zone (ROS) in accordance with Chapter 15: Implementation of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. This new zoning district was adopted by City Council on June 14, 2010. While the text for the ROS zone was pending the Planning Staff reviewed the areas identified by the Land Development Plan map (Map 12-1) as Open Space, and developed a list of properties proposed for rezoning to this new zoning designation. In reviewing the properties depicted on the Land Development Plan map (Map 12-1) as Open Space, staff identified a number of errors and locations where the ROS zone would not be appropriate. These properties are not included as a part of the Comprehensive Rezoning 2010 – ROS Rezoning, and Staff intends to include these properties in a future amendment to the 2008 P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

City of Dover Comprehensive Plan that will be brought forward in accordance with the amendment procedure set forth in Chapter 15: Implementation of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Rezoning 2010 – ROS Rezoning proposes to rezone 150 properties city- wide. These properties consist primarily of City parkland, required open space within residential developments, State open space, and Maple Dale Country Club. In an effort to ensure transparency in this process and allow time for public comment, the Planning Office sent out letters to property owners of all lands proposed for rezoning on June 3, 2010, explaining the proposal and offering the opportunity for affected property owners to meet with Planning Staff. The Planning Staff attended a number of meetings with these property owners to explain the proposal and answer questions. City Council conducted its First Reading of the ordinance (Ordinance #2010-21) to accomplish the Comprehensive Rezoning 2010 – ROS Rezoning on June 28, 2010, referred the ordinance to the Planning Commission for July 19, 2010, and set the public hearing and final action by City Council for August 9, 2010.

Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: Recreational and Open Space (ROS) Rezoning Chronology of Events February 9, 2009 City Council adopts 2008 Comprehensive Plan which contains direction for the City of Dover Planning Office to work towards the creation of a zoning district for the purpose of regulating permanent open space areas. March 2010 City Planning Staff draft an ordinance to create the Recreational and Open Space (ROS) zone. (MI-10-10) April 12, 2010 The proposed ordinance to create the ROS zone is introduced at the Parks, Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee meeting. April 26, 2010 The proposed ordinance to create the ROS zone has its First Reading during the City Council meeting and is forwarded to the Planning Commission for a recommendation. The proposed ordinance is numbered #2010-12. April – June 2010 Planning Staff begins analysis of the Zoning Map and the Land Development Plan Map 12-1 (land use map) to determine the extent of affected properties and to prepare information for potentially affected property owners. Planning Staff reviews zoning city-wide to develop full list of parcels proposed for rezoning to the ROS zone. May 17, 2010 Ordinance #2010-12 is heard before the City of Dover Planning Commission and sent back to City Council with a recommendation for approval to create the Recreational and Open Space (ROS) zoning district. June 3, 2010 Property owners with properties proposed for rezoning were contacted by mail and offered an opportunity to schedule individual meetings with Planning Staff to discuss concerns and to gather information. Notice Letter mailed to 33 property owners involving 150 properties. Planning Staff held meetings with representatives of 3 properties and had other contacts (phone calls, office visits, etc.) from 8 property owners. June 14, 2010 City Council holds public hearings on Ordinance #2010-12 and adopts the Recreational and Open Space Zone with Staff amendment #1. Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 §30 and Article 4 §4.10 and 4.11. June 28, 2010 City Council conducted its First Reading of the ordinance to accomplish the Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS Rezoning (Ordinance #2010-21). Page 1 of 2 – Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS Zone July 29, 2010

June 30, 2010 Property owners within 200 feet of all parcels proposed for rezoning were notified by mail and directed to contact Planning Staff with any questions or concerns. Notice of Rezoning mailed to 2,836 property owners (76 Letters returned for addressing problems with 20 Letters re-sent to forwarding addresses.) From June 30th – July 8th, Planning Staff fielded 153 phone call inquiries and 26 office visitor inquiries regarding the Notice. From July 9th – July 29th, Planning Staff fielded 44 phone call inquiries and 24 office visitor inquiries regarding the Notice. June 30, 2010 Binders and maps with Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS Rezoning information are posted on the City of Dover website and put on display in City Hall and the Dover Public Library. June 30, 2010 Legal ads were placed in the Dover Post and Delaware State News July 3, 2010 regarding the proposed rezoning. July 19, 2010 The Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS Rezoning is scheduled to be heard before the Planning Commission for the purpose of conducting a public hearing and formulating a recommendation to City Council. Planning Commission conducted a public hearing with 14 individuals speaking during the hearing. A series of 10 items of written correspondence (emails and letters) were also received for the record. Planning Commission recommended approval of Ordinance #2010-12 and recommended approval of the rezonings as listed in the 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning: ROS Summary Table (Items #1-150) with the following exceptions withdrawn and excluded from the rezoning: #49 Maple Dale Country Club at 39 Maple Dale Road, #93 City of Dover property at 425 College Road, and #124 a portion of the Lands of Woodbrook Development LLC at 1052 South Governors Avenue. The zoning of these three properties (#49, #93, and #124) is recommended to remain as they are currently zoned. The Planning Commission vote recommending approval was 6-0 with one abstention due to property ownership within proximity to an open space area. August 9, 2010 Public Hearing scheduled on Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS Rezoning before the City Council. Page 2 of 2 – Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS Zone July 29, 2010

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE #2010-21 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE 2 CITY OF DOVER BY CHANGING ZONING DESIGNATIONS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES 3 TO THE RECREATIONAL AND OPEN SPACE (ROS) ZONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 4 THE 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED ON NOVEMBER 23, 2009. 5 6 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property 7 within the limits of the City of Dover; and 8 9 WHEREAS, Delaware Code, Title 22, Chapter 3 Municipal Zoning Regulations, Section 303, 10 Purpose of Regulations, states that zoning regulations shall be made in accordance with a 11 Comprehensive Plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets, to secure safety from fire, 12 panic and other dangers, to provide health, general welfare, adequate light and air, to prevent the 13 overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population, and to facilitate the adequate 14 provision of transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, and other public requirements; and 15 16 WHEREAS, Delaware Code, Title 22, Chapter 7 Planning Commission, Section 702 (c) 17 Comprehensive Development Plan, states that the Comprehensive Plan shall be the basis for the 18 development of zoning regulations and that upon adoption of the Comprehensive Development 19 Plan, the official zoning map shall be amended to rezone all lands within the municipality in 20 accordance with the uses of land provided for in the Comprehensive Development Plan; and 21 22 WHEREAS, the City of Dover adopted the City of Dover 2008 Comprehensive Plan on February 23 9, 2009 and amended such on November 23, 2009; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the on June 14, 2010, Dover City Council adopted Ordinance #2010-12, amending 26 Appendix B - Zoning to create the Recreational and Open Space (ROS) zone. 27 28 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has prepared a map for the Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS 29 Rezoning, showing recommendations to change zoning designations of specific properties to 30 Recreational and Open Space (ROS) zone so that the City of Dover Zoning Map is in accordance 31 with the adopted 2008 Comprehensive Plan, as amended on November 23, 2009. 32 33 34 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY 35 OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 36 37 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map 38 and Zoning Ordinance of the City of Dover is amended by changing the zoning 39 designations of specific properties to Recreational and Open Space (ROS) zone as 40 depicted on the map entitled “City of Dover Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS 41 Rezoning” dated August 9, 2010.

42 43 SYNOPSIS 44 The proposed ordinance would rezone certain properties to the 45 Recreational and Open Space (ROS) Zone in conformance with the 2008 46 Comprehensive Plan, as required by Delaware Code. 47 48 Actions History: June 28, 2010 – Introduced at City Council 49

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE #2010-12 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, be amended by adding a new Section 30, as follows: Section 30. Recreational and open space zone (ROS). 30.1 Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this zoning type is to establish zoning regulations that promote preservation and management of natural and recreational open space and responsible development of active communities that promote healthy and active lifestyles. 30.2 Permitted Uses. No building or premises shall be used and no building shall be erected which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose except the following: 30.21 Public and/or private parks and playgrounds. 30.22 Natural areas, woodland areas, public and private open space. 30.23 Athletic fields, game courts, basketball courts, recreation centers, picnic areas, and pavilions/gazebos. 30.24 Public and/or private swimming pools. 30.25 Boat ramps/docks and fishing piers. 30.26 Golf driving ranges and baseball batting cages. 30.27 Golf courses and country clubs. 30.28 Clubhouses and their associated meeting/activity rooms. 30.3 Accessory Uses. Accessory uses as follows: (a) Accessory uses customarily incidental to the principal permitted use and necessary to the operation of the principal permitted use located on the same premises therewith shall also be a permitted use. 30.4 Conditional Uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general conditions set forth in Article 10 Section 1 and to any specified requirements set forth below: Page 1 of 6

30.41 Residential Life-Style Communities inclusive of golf course communities, equestrian communities, and other country club style residential neighborhoods subject to the following: (a) Maximum Density. The maximum density for a Residential Life-Style Community shall be no more than one unit per acre of the total site area, with the density to be clustered on the site. (b) Open Space. A minimum of 75% of the total land area must remain open or devoted to natural open space, active recreation, passive recreation, and/or other recreational use. (c) Housing Types shall include: i. One-family detached dwellings ii. Duplex dwellings iii. Multiplex dwellings iv. Townhouses v. Garden apartments (d) Design standards. The design standards and dimensional requirements (bulk and parking regulations) shall be in accordance with article 4, sections 4.10 and 4.11, except that the planning commission may relax any of these requirements where the developer can demonstrate that such action is desirable and consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the comprehensive plan. (e) Accessory Uses. Accessory, non-commercial uses customarily incidental to the principal conditional use and any other use necessary to the operation of the principal conditional use located on the same premises therewith shall also be a permitted use. (f) Implementation Plan. As part of an application to the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Review, the applicant must provide a detailed Implementation Plan for which completion of such a plan becomes a condition of approval. At a minimum, the Implementation Plan should do the following: i. Provided documentation for how the site will provide recreation and open space for its residents. This information will be reviewed by the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement committee under the guidelines of Article 5, Section 10. ii. Provide a procedure or documentation for how community resources, inclusive of the recreation elements approved for the Residential Life-Style Community will be maintained for its residents in the event that any commercial, recreational, or otherwise associated portion of the community is dissolved or disbanded. iii. Provide a report to the Planning Commission that details how the proposed Conditional Use is in keeping with the surrounding residential or commercial character. If surrounding land uses are residential in nature, the Page 2 of 6

Implementation Plan should note the density and bulk standards of surrounding neighborhoods. If surrounding land uses are commercial in nature, the Implementation Plan should consider issues of traffic, noise, and compatibility. 30.42 Livery stables and riding academies, provided that the corrals shall be at least 200 feet from any dwelling, school, church, eating place and intermittent or running, natural or artificial watercourses. 30.43 Museums, nature centers, and cultural facilities. 30.44 Commercial uses customarily incidental to the principal use located on the same premises inclusive of eating and drinking establishments, retail businesses, and service businesses. (a) Off-Street Parking requirements for commercial uses shall refer to Article 6, Section 3. (b) No structure housing a commercial use shall be located within 30 feet of a lot line. 30.5 Setbacks. No structure, equipment or game court surface permitted under this section shall be located nearer than 30 feet to any lot line. 30.6 Building height. No structure permitted under this section shall exceed 3 stories or 35 feet in height. 30.7 Signs. Signs shall meet the regulations found in article 5, section 4, supplementary sign regulations. 30.8 Parking spaces. Parking for non-residential uses and structures, excluding gazebos, is required at a rate of one parking space per 300 S.F. of floor area or in accordance with Article 6, Section 3, whichever is greater. 30.81 Planning Commission may waive some or all of the required parking if the applicant can demonstrate that development is a fully accessible pedestrian- oriented facility and/or is served by a variety of transportation modes. 30.9 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in article 5, section 8.1. 30.10 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for the erection or enlargement of all structures, development of recreation facilities, and prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for any change of use. Page 3 of 6

BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: That Appendix B- Zoning, Article 4- Zoning Bulk and Parking Regulations be amended to read as follows: Section 4.10. R-20, R-15, R-10, R-8, RM-1, RM-2 planned neighborhood design option and recreation and open space zone (ROS). Bulk and Parking Standards for PND within the following zones: R-20, R-15, R-10, R-8, RM-1, RM-2, as well as Bulk and Parking Standards for the ROS zone are as follows: One-Family Multiplex One-Family Lot Duplex Detached Dwellings Line Dwellings Dwellings Dwellings Minimum requirements per dwelling unit: Lot area (sq. ft.) 7,500 6,000 4,500 4,000 Lot width (ft.) 70 65 40 Lot depth (ft.) 100 90 100 Off-street parking 2 2 2 2 spaces Minimum requirements per building: Front yard (ft.) 25 20 25 30 Minimum side yard 8 -- -- 10 (ft.) Total side yards 20 30 10 30 (ft.) Rear yard (ft.) 30 40 30 20 Lot width (ft.) 80 Lot depth (ft.) 80 Maximum permitted: Building height Stories 2 1/2 2 2 1/2 3 Feet 35 24 35 35 Lot coverage 40% 45% 45% 50% Number of 1 1 2 5 dwelling units per Page 4 of 6

building Section 4.11. R-20, R-15, R-10, R-8, RM-1, RM-2 planned neighborhood design option and recreation and open space zone (ROS). Bulk and Parking Standards for PND within the following zones: R-20, R-15, R-10, R-8, RM-1 and RM-2, as well as Bulk and Parking Standards for the ROS zone are as follows: Patio Townhouses Garden Houses Apts. Minimum requirements per dwelling unit: Minimum average lot area (sq. ft.) 3,500 2,200 1,800 Minimum lot area (sq. ft.) 3,000 2,000 1,800 Lot width (ft.) 40 22 Lot depth (ft.) 70 80 Off-street parking spaces 2 2 2 Minimum requirements per building: Lot area 1 acre Lot width (ft.) 100 Lot depth (ft.) 125 Building setback From street (ft.) 15 30 50 From property line (ft.) -- 20 50 Building spacing -- 30 50 Patio area 60% Patio dimension (ft.) 20 Maximum permitted: Building height Feet 24 35 35 Stories 2 3 2 Lot coverage 60% 75% 60% Average No. of dwelling units per 1 8 24 building ADOPTED: JUNE 14, 2010 Page 5 of 6

SYNOPSIS The purpose of the proposed ordinance is to create a Recreation and Open Space Zone that would be applied to City parks, protected open space, recreation areas within residential developments, and other areas identified as “Open Space” within the Land Development Plan. Actions History April 26, 2010 - First Reading at Council April 12, 2010 – Introduced at Parks, Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee Meeting Page 6 of 6

Ce Marley d City of Dover ar se W Cha K ee Scarboroug Tr ic on mm h 2010 Comprehensive Rezonong: ROS el us We a v t rsi in he Gr W R Pe ng rt F ar renis di Su t M Millc re l 57 58 K Ku to n Old L a re ys ek s t mil 150P er A in De nn e G M ri cK sic n e rs i m m o n M o or e cG drey u ll Final DRAFT eip do n e Pl h Ma e Bet Delaw a s pl e e ow n za Go r Ap Gl 56 ar er ri l en State D 52 53 55 U ov Ro Ni 59 ni D k ck y 54 bl ick 60 le ge v wl ar No Mi ol sity ic do Long Point er rth ch 61 C ps 51 ga te ae l Ol d Le i ea ow M H em st ed Me Du Pu ad M po y is h 93 n rp l eM Fairw a ol J ar il li p t r y a ti 50 r e go Ph Ve r so n G Co nw a n H iaw at 149 St a oa k h Schooner ol te State a C el le l n Hw te Ar on er al ge 94 c co 148 hi Terry Pa e ff y M edi im in M az eri Ba 1 W ar no ck in To p rk 97 To Mil d 147 95 k l m J 62 W st e r so w n le r 146 W pa Ve na h ap e Po Po rtm Me O inste 100 nu D r ck Bu sen Marin A nc ind Bu e rtru r s er k sh ri o ol yn 102 ck gg el ell ind e Oa ick L n it e ho hit r Aug n le n o h v itz rt y n ge 63 ness B ar ow r W rd O ld W Pres o o n Pat r usta za ay n d ai r Woo Ta oa m cA le C CM c D F tr T er rb Ni Ma rad ower al ich Inv iel a Blac kh tl e R M e St ous d ed tw ld B y cK E set pe Sand oolh irf Oa fie B n h ar as s n ea 64 T re w e o i ck Mu k n ur e eath e nz Sch ilson ar se St s t 70 101 Su ak gle 49 ge A ri Ei Fre G A lo nn Lo st W hea s Oak m o nt Fo r W t er 103 o n e O ov D S uv ttn ris hit R cres e nn Cen er na G le tA 65 69 Ol 71 72 104 mbia r Ha W ar Bu in Be d Vir te oc k Sa llri Iron w o od g 96 wo o d R os s Colu ra kf 145 144 coc n ve Lake Han ins rnto 66 74 75 inia ak tD ov or d 143 rn O k view H op Caro e T ho 48 Ke 76 Fair illi s 141 Ma h Aco ve er Walk Brad Lo n ro nt W r ce tG tn u 45 47 77 an L ak e s Ken46W l 107 ru er 140 oga 139 ton ing 67 he Sp sch gP C t a 78 t f o rd ney 108 Mi t ny 138 Nic h couMart Rod y as ol h Shinne ed a lse As tc o r o in t 68 Ha land l Willi 105 W ha am ew Pea Fo 109 n co vi 136 Fox l iot ot Up nhi 137 Nixo Girl S ck 80 ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 106 Patr ee 44 Kle 81 Haz el 110 pl Gre 1 NORTHDOWN DR RM-1 ROS 76 HITCHING POST DR RG-3 ROS rno Liberty h i ll Ma 2 FAIRNEST CT RM-1 ROS 77 HERITAGE DR RG-3 ROS C a u st i 43 in Edge a th Littl e Creek vani Me Sm i 3 NORTHDOWN DR RM-1 ROS 78 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8 ROS 82 83 e t in ll on B isi g nsyl a l 4 NORTHDOWN DR RM-1 ROS 79 41 HOMBERG CIR R-8 ROS il e xH 8988 hous Eiger 84 Mary Div u e co 5 WESTOVER DR RM-1 ROS 80 HOMBERG CIR R-8 ROS Teal Cold l o w ta a Clar Pen w are111 Fo 6 NORTHDOWN DR RM-1 ROS 81 109 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8, COZ-1 ROS. COZ-1 90 n Dela rica 85 A ham Prospect e 7 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 82 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 al A me 91 ecil Sprin t d at Sw 8 WESTOVER DR RM-1 ROS 83 209 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 t ood ne Fl in 86 wo o C ton b H il l e rs e ar w r o li t 9 THAMES DR RM-1 ROS 84 SAULSBURY RD R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 B ri ld Kirk Gov Pew P er iw 87 on Ke R id Fult Corn 10 CHARRING CROSS DR RM-1 ROS 85 744 BICENTENNIAL BLVD R-8 ROS O g 42 40 ink gs Ruthe rford So m n Ca 35 er Dwight 11 WESTOVER DR RM-1 ROS 86 GEORGE WASHINGTON DR RM-1 ROS le Independence 38 t sbury Tuc Wes Kin gely 112 erno er 12 WORCHESTER DR RM-1 ROS 87 GEORGE WASHINGTON DR RG-2 ROS 41 39K k n Jo hnH el No ton et l way on Que ma Saul Carver G G un 37 reen Madis on r 13 WESTOVER DR RM-1 ROS 88 INDEPENDENCE BLVD RG-3 ROS Cranberry Run Wes Libe Babbunn Ham p ton r eentree sion er nB Par Haven JH Br o ow Y a rm New ck 14 WORCHESTER DR RM-1 ROS 89 43 LAMPLIGHTER LN RG-3 ROS ev Divi e Stoney Stat rs rs B Je ffe ad Loo ro w in 36 34 am s to n en Reed n Sh 15 eo Cam TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS 90 43 LAMPLIGHTER LN RG-3 ROS wn o uth ty AdFor Af 16 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS 91 GREENS OF DOVER RG-3 ROS June Fores 113 ite d Gibbs er r est 17 CHARRING CROSS DR RM-1 ROS 92 SAULSBURY RD RG-1, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 Signal Forrest B e rtra n d t PL Z Un Ingram W o od sto ck The Court M Co u 18 CHARRING CROSS DR RM-1 ROS 93 425 COLLEGE RD IO ROS 114 nt Ma rga ret 19 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS 94 COLLEGE RD R-20 ROS d Cher r y 135 ilroa ry 20 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS 95 WOODCREST DR R-8 ROS 115 Faw n 92 Paul Vine enn 21 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 96 BUTTNER PL RG-3 ROS Ra mP Farmview illi a 16 Davis 116 W r 22 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 97 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS 33 32 e lle Rees K en t l 23 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 98 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS 15 Sim 118 wg Mi en is Bar r Mag gies 24 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 99 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS Ban k Sh o tg ve Co H Ot ta le 19 24 Ban slati No on ue 25 TRAFALGAR DR w RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 100 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS Ru n C nnector 13 12 h Sussex Nort er Bl r d Fo Legi n rt h un Wat ill b e fo r 26 HAZLETTVILLE RD RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ D 101 WALKER RD R-20 ROS e 14 18 20 Elm Ro raw MC ning de o wn Mi 27 ELECTRIC AVE IO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 102 OVERLOOK PL RG-3 ROS Ho r s d lins m C ol Co m erce i Kerb ra i t t r 28 10 ELECTRIC AVE IO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 103 N GOVERNORS AVE R-8 ROS 11 C o ffl ise R iv Pa ibb nd 2 in Be er 29 WYOMING MILL RD R-10 ROS 104 N STATE ST R-8 ROS 22 th Scull 9 8 23 25 Sou a 30 CANAL ST R-10 ROS 105 422 N NEW ST IO ROS Tr oftl eldr 1 119 31 CRICKLE CREEK LN R-10 ROS epo 106 414 N NEW ST IO ROS L Sh ak e es 10 32 S FARMVIEW DR RG-2 ROS 107 RODNEY RD R-8 ROS m 7 ttville We m yss nd Ja 3 4 Llyo d y 33 S FARMVIEW DR RG-2 ROS 108 WASHINGTON ST R-8 ROS y rinaen 5 Hazle Hope arac kin Pu Ba 34 KENTON RD on 35 N CAROLINE PL RG-2, COZ-1 RG-3 ROS, COZ-1 ROS 109 ST JONES RIVER 110 ST JONES RIVER R-20 R-20 ROS ROS B ulld g e ffr at ill Ruth 121 120 Sack bl he 36 FORREST AVE RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ic 111 230 KINGS HWY k R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ re Wyo m ing Mil Je K Qu 26 ic Lau nc W o 6 y Dover ont Sa 37 DOVER-HARTLY RD Pu 38 FORREST AVE RG-2, COZ-1 RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 112 PARK DR 113 E LOOCKERMAN ST R-10 R-10 ROS ROS r rb sh Leste 27 ood fe t a y1 39 HEATHERFIELD WAY ty R-8 and RG-2 ROS 114 COURT ST IO, H ROS, H De Tr l ire er w Dup r Pine n 40 PEBBLE VALLEY DR ffe R-8 ROS 115 410 LEGISLATIVE AVE IO, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H y Sh t io Stat Bradford t Sunset p k La roo Elec Shank h a 41 HEATHERFIELD WAY R-8 ROS 116 THE GREEN RGO, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H n s ig n S Waples s o rt Park e Hw S llb ale k Lotu gr it 42 CHELSEA WAY R-10 ROS 117 THE GREEN RGO, H ROS, H i ns Monroe een 43 SWEETGUM DR R-8 ROS 118 EAST AVE IO, H ROS, H a G v ri c ch Janeka Eve a r Tr 44 ARBOR DR R-8 ROS 119 S DUPONT HWY RG-2 ROS l u op Be ns orris M 45 ARBOR DR R-8 ROS 120 S NEW ST R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ Ko Westview Orchard t 46 S TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROS 121 S QUEEN ST R-8 and CPO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ Wyoming en 134 id 47 S TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROS 122 WESTVIEW TER R-10 ROS 28 es S tarlifter rt o es dse dge Roosevelt Pr 48 N TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROS 123 WOODSEDGE RD R-10 ROS R 49 39 MAPLE DALE RD RC ROS 124 1052 S GOVERNORS AVE APT IRRIG R-10 ROS Woo n iver Chase Cha 50 236 KENTON RD RM-1, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 125 NEW BURTON RD R-10 ROS Bu rl H olly 123M 51 5 W DENNEYS RD RM-1 ROS 126 BLUE BEACH DR R-8 ROS Galaxy alla rd 52 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 ROS 127 BLUE BEACH DR R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 29 Ne Oak Ste nector 53 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 ROS 128 TURNER DR R-8 ROS Riverside w on 54 MAPLE GLEN DR Bas R-8 ROS 129 1547 S DUPONT HWY CPO Ho ROS nC ad wa L yn n haven 124 B55 MAPLE GLEN DR M R-8 ROS 130 S DUPONT HWY CPO ROS rs e Ru 133 li o 125 B e rt n l in 56 MAPLE GLEN DR le R-8 ROS 131 16 S STATE ST CPO ROS pond Sh lue Beach ne Legend w eo arl er ns F ch 132 57 126 MILLCREEK Eva C a DR st RM-1 ROS 132 45 S DUPONT HWY R-20 ROS Wi S ir 58 8 GRINDING WHEEL DR RM-1 ROS 133 45 S DUPONT HWY R-20 ROS May s 30 s D ea Pu l er 59 MCKEE RD R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 134 ST JONES RIVER IO ROS n ts ta n ne s idd rb e Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS 31 Do 60 1510 MCKEE RD Buf R-8 ROS 135 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ 61 MCKEE RD R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 136 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ 127 126 Ja nte w ood g rr y 62 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS 137 SHADYBROOK DR R-8 ROS Dover Parcels derAl 63 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS 138 N LITTLE CREEK RD R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ Kesselring 131 64 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS 139 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ 128 Mockingbird ck 65 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS 140 NIXON LN R-20 ROS Dover Boundary 130 Old Rudni 66 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS 141 NIXON LN R-20 ROS Turner Mimosa Post 129 67 28 CARNOUSTIE RD R-10 ROS 142 NIXON LN R-20 ROS Ü 68 1357 WALKER RD RG-3 ROS 143 NIXON LN R-20 ROS Garton Hama n Mayb Web 69 OLD FORGE DR R-10 ROS 144 ACORN LN R-20 ROS Co Map Created By: bs erry op 70 OLD FORGE DR RG-3 ROS 145 1210 WHITE OAK RD R-20 ROS Department of Planning and Inspections Dupont er 71 OLD FORGE DR R-8 ROS 146 TOWNSEND BLVD R-8 ROS Date Map Created: 5-24-10 Es Date Map Printed: 7-7-10 72 51 VILLAGE DR RG-3 ROS 147 TOWNSEND BLVD R-8 ROS ta t e 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 73 HITCHING POST DR RG-3 ROS 148 TOWNSEND BLVD R-8 ROS Feet 74 HITCHING POST DR RG-3 ROS 149 TOWNSEND BLVD R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 75 45 QUAIL HOLLOW DR R-8 ROS 150 110 PERSIMMON CIR MHP ROS 7-6-10

Forrest Fores June t Gibbs Independenc e o ck Exhibit A Bertrand Wo o d st ncoln wn ROS LiRezoning Fa Cherry Vine 92 Jawd Paul 16 Farmview n Davis ng to B enni ghter Ir ma ese Wo odmill 33 32 s Slau Clare 15 Re ye Ha S im o n Tr 24 nce a Saulsb Minim af 13 al ga 12 14 17 r 19 Ban ury st er W or c h e 18 20 Com m erce ni ng rne st 11 s 21 se o u i rs lin Be ise r Fai s llh sta iff 2 ro r 22 Pa To Broad 25 rth C M g No ee arrin 1 ad Ch 8 23 Enterpr is 9 W 10 Sh e es es m ha yss e tov 7 k T Wem ld ra rth e r tri 3 4 e es na No ID # Property Address Llyo Current Zoning Proposed Zoning ef m Ja y Ka do 5 lett ville 1 NORTHDOWN DR Moo RM-1 re d ROS J fre H az Ann RM-1 Ruth w en 6 2 FAIRNEST CT ROS n u ill 3 NORTHDOWN DR RM-1 ROS Q Gagen 26 4 NORTHDOWN DR RM-1 ROS o 5 WESTOVER DR RM-1 ROS nn r Ca 6 NORTHDOWN DR RM-1 ROS Leste nM ale 27 7 TRAFALGAR DR 8 WESTOVER DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ RM-1 ROS nd ill W y om i ng o s x rby 9 THAMES DR RM-1 ROS Sa ok De i tti n ro tr 10 CHARRING CROSS DR RM-1 ROS Br li lb hire Elec 11 WESTOVER DR RM-1 ROS G gh le Mill 12 WORCHESTER DR RM-1 ROS va ic am u 13 WESTOVER DR RM-1 ROS Be chak 14 WORCHESTER DR RM-1 ROS Kons 15 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS 16 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS Wyom ing 17 CHARRING CROSS DR RM-1 ROS 28 18 CHARRING CROSS DR RM-1 ROS 19 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS les Ye 20 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS Cha Ü r arsle y 21 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 22 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ n rto 23 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZHolly BuROS, SWPOZ 29 24 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ w Ne Legend 25 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ S Oak te Riverside 26 HAZLETTVILLE RD RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ war t Dover Parcels ee 27 ELECTRIC AVE IO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, 125 Crickle Creek Dover Boundary Crk B end 28 10 ELECTRIC AVE IO, SWPOZ SWPOZ Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS Shad 29 WYOMING MILL RD R-10 w ROS Blue Beach Cana o 30 CANAL ST R-10 ROS Baker Turn Map Created: 30 le 31 CRICKLE CREEK LN R-10 ROSd l Department of Planning and Inspections rs Fid nt e 32 S FARMVIEW DR RG-2 ROS Wi Date Map Created: 6-2-10 Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 33 S FARMVIEW DR RG-2 ROS rbe o od 31 DogwROS, File Path: Inspect/Comp Plan 2009/MI-10-11 127 0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600 92 SAULSBURY RD RG-1, COZ-1 COZ-1 rry Feet

66 Exhibit B ov e 49 tnu t Gr 48 Tu rnberry Baltusrol ROS Rezoning es Ch r Ta yl 47 o 45 Sc io to Legend Ken ton 46 67 e Dover Parcels lle g bo Wi Dover Boundary Ar ng Co ed Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS r Fo h ot As Shi nn ec oc ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning k 34 KENTON68 Ha r m o ny t RD RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ee 35 N CAROLINE PL RG-3 r ROS dom Sw ing Wa l ke Free rn Ha Klei Bu ze 36 FORREST AVE RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 gu n m ltin e Tre e 37 DOVER-HARTLY RD RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 38 FORREST AVE RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1Liberty 44 ustie 39 HEATHERFIELD WAY R-8 and RG-2 ROS 43 Ca rn 40 PEBBLE VALLEY DR R-8 ROS o 41 HEATHERFIELD WAY R-8 ROS 42 CHELSEA l l WAY R-10 ROS Ha Independ enc e 43 Fo SWEETGUM DR x R-8 ROS r te 44 ARBOR DR R-8 pligh Lam ROS 89 45 ARBOR DR R-8 E ROS 88 n 46 S TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROSsse Sto ow 47 S TURNBERRY DR HarrRM-1 90 ROS xH ey a ll w ick 48 N TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROS llo ll Ta Pe 49 39 MAPLE DALE RD RCIvy Ha ROS bb le 66 OAKMONT DR 91R-10 ne ROS C ol d F lin t a l s to od Te Field ld wo 67 28 CARNOUSTIE RD R-10 ROS Green ar O g Bri Sprin ley brook Val lin Stone Caro in e Periw kle Blade Som 42 40 erse 35 t 41 38 C he lsea 39 Ü Map Created: Fa l m th ou Matthew Ke vi n 37 Greenway Hampto n Greentree Par Haven Cranberry Run 36 Department of Planning and Inspections Heatherfield Date Map Created: 6-2-10 Fairw ide 34 h Cre Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 Ya rm outh La ou rts M a rs ay File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 C kes Forrest June Feet ek

e k re llc 57 h Exhibit C Scarboroug 58 Mi s ROS Rezoning ey st nn ri m ll G De i Mc Ke ty e r si i ve 56 Un on re State vin gt no ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 52 ap Co 55 M Se 45 ARBOR DR R-8 ROS w ar e Ni 59 ski 53 54 le 46 S TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROS 60 Ro en ck Gl bl De y ic 47 S TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROS la k 61 te ine 51 dy 48 N TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROS ga Mi w an th No ch r ae B 49 39 MAPLE DALE RD RC ROS r l Ke n s in 50 236 KENTON RD RM-1, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 g to Hem ste n 51 5 W DENNEYS RD RM-1 ROS d 52 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 ROS 93 ow Me ad 53 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 ROS M ay is Fair w 54 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 M ROS olh Ja 50 o illip is g 55 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 ROS ry ho Gre Ph so e Vera n rs 56 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 ROS h ma W hi t e e 57 126 MILLCREEK DR RM-1 ROS ton 58 8 GRINDINGCoWHEEL DR RM-1 ROS s lle Co em 59 MCKEE RD ge R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 94 ell G in nw P Moonstone p M 60 1510 MCKEE RD ark R-8 ROS To Ar on az er al 61 MCKEE RD R-8, mCOZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 im t in es k Medi 62 l 62 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS y pa W 95 in arnoc lle 63 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS st k Va na O er ne 64 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS Pi h Po r t Portm Me rush ti e 65 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS e rio olle n Ta nza n g A ug 63 66 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS y C e a ltra usta e ss ar in ern anter am 67 28 CARNOUSTIE RD R-10 ROS o Pr Sh Inv Tam O u Tro n B n Pi q es A wich tw O ea Gl e Blackh ak Re M Sa n d nea i ck dO cK gl H Legend ee Sa es 64 ak tCree le oy y in th Whea k tA la 49 For 70 Ma t ke es on M Dover Parcels Al ale o nt Qu lor ed ui Oakm ail y ee Lo rfi es zo pl nn Ta H Dover Boundary st eld 71 to beorezoned to wROS Tr 69Properties proposed Me 65 72 ad n V Bro ow llow Sai Ga irg Be nt An dre rde i A nn ni a llr od 73 ws ive Ironwo n 66 75 Map Created: C arnoust Ü 74 l sr o Department of Planning and Inspections ge ie 76 Villa Date Map Created: 6-2-10 al e 48 tu Ke ov 45 nt Turnberry Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 Gr Ke ritage2009/MI-10-11 ut 47 B nt on e r File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning t n Arb 1,770 Walke2,360 Ch es 46 67 o to 77 bury 0 295 590 H1,180 78 Sauls or Sc i Feet

Re n O ak Exhibit D Me d Oa Pi 64 ld f ie rio n k tC es ree ROS Rezoning k o Sch Mu on ir Fo Wils r ge ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 70 For Alon 64 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS olho 65 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS nt lor use ld zo o Oakm y 66 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS O Qu oo ail ee Ta 67 28 CARNOUSTIE RD R-10 W ROS o Ho McK dc r ad llo 68 1357 WALKER RD RG-3 ROS 69 Me 71 69 OLD FORGE DR R-10 es t ROS 72 wn w en 65 70 OLD FORGE DR RG-3 Bu ROS ard Bro rn Ann t Tu wG 71 V OLD FORGE DR ir R-8 ttn r ROS 51 gi c es od er 72 VILLAGE ni DR RG-3 ROS rno ie Hi tch 73 a POST DR HITCHING RG-3 Wo ROS 96 Be od u st Ironwo 73 74 HITCHING POST DR RG-3 ROS e llr lle ing ive g 75 45 QUAIL HOLLOW DR R-8 ROS 66 74 75 Ca Co Po 76 HITCHING POST DR RG-3 ROS e 77 HERITAGE DR RG-3 ROS sr Villag ol st ltu Ke 78 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8 ROS 76 nt Cobbler Ba 79 41 HOMBERG CIR R-8 ROS 80 HOMBERG CIR R-8 ROS ge ita 81 109 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8, COZ-1 ROS. COZ-1 Her 82 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 i o to 77 83 209 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 67 Sc er 84 SAULSBURY RD R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 Walk 85 744 BICENTENNIAL BLVD R-8 ROS 78 86 GEORGE WASHINGTON DR RM-1 ROS 87 GEORGE WASHINGTON DR RG-2 ROS Arlb 88 INDEPENDENCE BLVD c o t LN at RG-3 ROS rg Wha e 89 43 LAMPLIGHTER RG-3 ROS Ha r m o ny 68 79 90 43 LAMPLIGHTER LN RG-3 ROS F r eed 91 GREENS OF DOVER RG-3 ROS om Bice M on in nt e n 80 Kle t Bla io Patr Liber ty nial nc 81 n t ra tio De cla rn erho Matt s Saul all 83 xH bury Fo L a mp lighter Mee 82 84 90 89 88 Legend E C obb a hous leston E ige r Clar ti n g ssex e al Dover Parcels w nt H arro e Dover Boundary nt n H Ke all Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS e In d on ny ti all on Ivy H Colo 85 Ü ep 91 Cold C t en d a tone in Te Fields Fl c 86 en l g ld Sprin O e Stone Pa u l Reve r e e Ge o r g ad h Map Created: Green B l Was te 87 Pew Department of Planning and Inspections br o 38 ok Date Map Created: 6-2-10 ingt 35 e Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 r e drow File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 Ca r o l in Woo on ht Greenway 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 Dwig Feet

Exhibit E 93 ROS Rezoning si c Le e ip a Mi g ilm sho ol le ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning M W l C d is hoe it a 93 425 COLLEGE RD IO ROS R ra on Ja 94 COLLEGE RD R-20 ROS ym Ve so Du Ra n 95 WOODCREST DR R-8 ROS po 96 BUTTNER PL RG-3 ROS nt 97 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS Co 98 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS nw ell 99 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS 100 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS Hiawatha 94 101 WALKER RD R-20 ROS 102 OVERLOOK PL RG-3 ROS 103 N GOVERNORS AVE R-8 ROS Terry 97 104 N STATE ST R-8 ROS po re 95 99 Le 98 nu 100 W Ve in st a tm Vi e es k er st Overloo 102 L a ke State o Sch er Sil v olho on use Wils od Wo ic k Patr on 101 Al t cres r zo Legend ylo Ta Lynn 103 ry mete Qu Dover Parcels oria l Ce ail Lake sid e Me m H Boundary M ee Dover cK Properties proposed to be wn Ann 104 oll o Bu tT rs Bro rezoned to ROS urn Vi ttn ern er 72 Walk o w r rg dc es er in 96 oo ia Lake W Go Brad Map Created: v lla 73 view Department Vi of Planning and Inspections Dateg Map Created: 6-2-10 s Fair e R os d Caro woo ford Ü t Wes 75 Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 Pear 74 150 300 File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 l m bi a 0 600 900 1,200 ania 77 C ol u P en n syl v Feet

Oa k 145 143 141 n C ly m er Nixo 139 bia Lake k olum Oa Exhibit F C 107 hi te 140 Aco view d ison woo Fair W Caro Mad 108 ROS Rezoning Penn Sp r illis rn ney h S R od W tsc Girl s y lv ua n am Mi Willi ngt o l en 105 Edgehill hi a n ia ke n Lind Was La ce lse 109 Up Ha Av e er c ou Brad view ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 137 106 ee lan Gr y t 105 422 N NEW ST IO ROS d el le 110 is Mill Le w ford Haz p Ma nh Pear a d 106 414 N NEW ST IO ROS ill Clar rylan Ma th 107 RODNEY RD R-8 ROS Smi Ed g n on 108 WASHINGTON ST R-8 ROS Pen em en Mary 109 g G ard ST JONES RIVER R-20 ROS il Ma rt rin Sp 110 ST JONES RIVER R-20 ROS o wta t Ame sylv a ania ware 111 111 230 KINGS HWY R-8, SWPOZ ROS, A ha SWPOZ m Dela B a ll rican Sw lu e il Cec s 112 PARK DR R-10 ROS a King co ell ldw t 113 E LOOCKERMAN ST R-10 ROS Ca on Fult 114 COURT ST IO, H ROS Pe n n an 115 e410 LEGISLATIVE AVE IO, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H Jo Rid m 112 r hn gel er Park ck u nnBr Kirk Gov 116 THE GREEN Lo o RGO, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H H sion Stat e Divi rd y n d ya 117 THE GREEN ow RGO, H Ba ROS, H Nob Hill t woo Ba bb Wes en nors t on Que 118 EAST AVE un IO, n e lHl ROS Wes B New Lady Bu g Reed Libe 119 S DUPONT HWY RG-2 ROS reet 113 JH Bro 120 S NEW ST R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ Moriarity e St wn rty Stat 121 S QUEEN ST Dupont R-8 and CPO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ Z For est Minor Th e PL ited M er Un Cou Lincoln York Ra D uk e of 114 Cou rt n try Margaret Little Creek Davis 115 Cherry ilro Fed Paul Vine Pen n 116 ad eral ia m Will hter h 117 Ma rtin Slau g Clare Nort lle r nce 118 Kent Co Mi Le a Minim vy k Ban wg il tg Legi en Sho tle Co H Kerb Sussex l er ue ur Wat Bl v Cas Ban slati t un in E lm New ni ng lins y Col Ba e Ri v Legend er th Sou ll Dover Parcels S cu 119 ol Scho Dover Boundary en tary Elem Ho l y Cross Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS cS bli Moo re Pu Map Created: Ann Hope kin ur i on Department of Planning and Inspections Ü y arac La et ta t af 121 Sack Llyo Date Map Created: 6-2-10 120 po r el Bradford d Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 ns 2009/MI-10-11 ra File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning T stv We iew to r Dover n Bu 0 275 550 1,100 1,650 2,200 w Sunset Monroe Ne Feet

bury ys s Sauls Wem ID # Property Address 119 Current Zoning Proposed Zoning t Llyo Wes 122 WESTVIEW TER R-10 ROS Que re en 123 WOODSEDGE RD R-10 ROS Moo New d Hope Ruth A nn Exhibit G 124 c in S GOVERNORS AVE APT IRRIG R-10 k1052 ROS et y a ra af Sack cS 121 ROS 120 Rezoning 125 NEW BURTON RD R-10 ROS bli 126 BLUE BEACH DR R-8 ROS Pu Dover 127 BLUE BEACH DR R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ Laurel 128 TURNER DR R-8 ROS d oo 129 1547 S DUPONT HWY CPO ROS w Gooden er 130 S Pi ne HWY DUPONT CPO ROS Sh 131 16 S STATE ST CPO ROS Waples 132 45 S DUPONT HWY R-20 ROS Monroe Westview Bradford hak tus 133 45LSoDUPONT HWY R-20 ROS Sunset Park Governors State Eve K 134 ST JONES RIVER IO ROS Janeka rgre Woodfor d ons ris en Shank M or c nt Orchard po Wyoming 134 Du Woo d Roosevelt n Ch ar s edge rto Ye les Jefferson ar River Chase 123 122 Bu sle y Wood burn New Holly Westwood Mal lard Oak St Crescent ew tor Sta c te nne Stre ar 124 o et t Ru nC Lynnha ven 125 on 133 Sh e nch Pu o adw Blue Beach 132 Ba ke r Turn Fid De dle at nt e s Wi rs Dogwoo d 127 rbe 126Alder rry Kesselring Legend 131 128 d Dover Parcels Mockingbir 130 R ud nic k Dover Boundary Old Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS Mimosa Turner 129 Post Haman Map Created: Mayberry er Department of Planning and Inspections Locust Point op Ü We Co Date Map Created: 6-2-10 bb s Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 Estat File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 e 0 262.5 525 1,050 1,575 2,100 Feet

m ev Ni Stens on y ad le it z Do r Suva na Exhibit H Br s on ve rri x t on k r Ha Oa Bra ROS Rezoning te rd hi ck fo W Fr Ro 145 144 Aco k c oc ea rn Han r ns pki Ho 143 Tho 141 Sta 142 m er rnto n y Cly Hw illis Sp W Nixo te 140 139 ru o Mah n 1 an h ce tsc Mi ga n Aca olas oo k Nich dybr Lex Sha 138 Girl er y cia Lind ingt ut Sc o Teak on 137 en Ha lse y 136 Fox Up on lan isi Div Little Creek d Gree nhill Ma rt a ll o t a i l a w an Ah a m B m er S lu e w ck co a o o ell L ldw t Prospect hill ge Ca Ed on Hill Corn er Kent ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning wa n 135 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ N ob Se John R ou n tre 136 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ Pi l e 137 SHADYBROOK DR R-8 ROS nn d ot Hu Babb Legend n do w 138 N LITTLE CREEK RD R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ ow Bu ll a Br nn e Sh er 139 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ op Dover Parcels Lady Bug Co Cameo 140 NIXON LN R-20 ROS Dover Boundary Regen t 141 NIXON LN R-20 ROS Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS Dupont 142 NIXON LN R-20 ROS JH Brown Mo riari Map Created: Mer Ingram M onarch 143 NIXON LN R-20 ROS Signal B Department of Planning and Inspections ay Co u 144 ACORN LN R-20 ROS Date Map Created: 6-2-10 Barrister Ü ty Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 ntry Margaret Holme Court Little Cree s 135 145 1210 WHITE OAK RD R-20 ROS File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 k M a rt 0 195 390 780 1,170 1,560 Feet in

Jonathan Exhibit I K urt se Su ROS Rezoning mr o Mic Pri tton lch helle We Kar en ID # Property Address Far Current Zoning Proposed Zoning rell Finis h Line 150 146 TOWNSEND BLVD A ud McG Ve r R-8 inn is ROS nell n Per si m m on 147 TOWNSEND BLVD rey r R-8 ROS ave o ly C ar 148 TOWNSEND BLVD We R-8 ROS n re Ol d ree Moo 149 TOWNSEND BLVD R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ an Mau Leips ic Sus 150 110 PERSIMMON CIR MHP ROS Pl d az Gor Bet a h on ip s ic Le St at e Hw y 1 149 Legend 148 n Du Hiawatha Dover Parcels po Baco Nimitz Dover Boundary er nt feri State c ill M Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS hoo 147 Sc Jef e or nd ne r Bu ep Inspections Map Created: 146 ck Department of PlanningLand To d D ra in pe wn r so W Date Map Created: 6-2-10 nu n se Ü Ve gs Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 ck st a Vi k g l A Bo File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 e Bu Ov er lo o e nc rv Marin h or 102 Ca er 0 195 390 780 1,170 1,560 Feet

2010 Comprehensive Rezoning: ROS Summary Table Page 1 of 4 ID # Parcel ID Property Address Owner Current Zoning Proposed Zoning Staff Recommendation PC Recommendation City Council Action 1 ED05-076.13-04-87.00 NORTHDOWN DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 2 ED05-076.13-04-64.00 FAIRNEST CT VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 3 ED05-076.13-04-65.00 NORTHDOWN DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 4 ED05-076.13-05-48.00 NORTHDOWN DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 5 ED05-076.13-02-60.00 WESTOVER DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 6 ED05-076.13-02-61.00 NORTHDOWN DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 7 ED05-076.13-01-58.00 TRAFALGAR DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 8 ED05-076.13-01-57.00 WESTOVER DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 9 ED05-076.13-02-59.00 THAMES DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 10 ED05-076.13-03-33.00 CHARRING CROSS DR WESTOVER LLC RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 11 ED05-076.13-04-66.00 WESTOVER DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 12 ED05-076.09-02-86.00 WORCHESTER DR ROBINO-SEA CHASE LLC RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 13 ED05-076.09-02-89.00 WESTOVER DR ROBINO-SEA CHASE LLC RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 14 ED05-076.09-02-88.00 WORCHESTER DR ROBINO-SEA CHASE LLC RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 15 ED05-076.09-02-01.00 TRAFALGAR DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 16 ED05-076.10-02-87.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 17 ED05-076.13-03-18.00 CHARRING CROSS DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 18 ED05-076.13-03-18.00 CHARRING CROSS DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 19 ED05-076.10-02-89.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 20 ED05-076.10-02-89.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 21 ED05-076.10-02-89.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 22 ED05-076.13-02-58.00 TRAFALGAR DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 23 ED05-076.13-02-57.00 TRAFALGAR DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 24 ED05-076.10-02-87.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 25 ED05-076.10-02-87.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 26 ED05-076.00-02-04.02 HAZLETTVILLE RD CITY OF DOVER RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 27 ED05-076.00-01-06.01 ELECTRIC AVE CITY OF DOVER- Schutte Park IO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 28 ED05-076.00-01-06.00 10 ELECTRIC AVE CITY OF DOVER- Schutte Park IO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 29 ED05-085.06-01-71.00 WYOMING MILL RD HIDDEN CREEK HOMEOWNERS R-10 ROS ROS ROS 30 ED05-085.06-01-70.00 CANAL ST HIDDEN CREEK HOMEOWNERS R-10 ROS ROS ROS 31 ED05-085.06-01-73.00 CRICKLE CREEK LN HIDDEN CREEK HOMEOWNERS R-10 ROS ROS ROS 32 ED05-076.10-01-46.00 S FARMVIEW DR CITY OF DOVER RG-2 ROS ROS ROS 33 ED05-076.10-01-46.00 S FARMVIEW DR CITY OF DOVER RG-2 ROS ROS ROS 34 ED05-076.06-06-61.00 KENTON RD CITY OF DOVER RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 35 ED05-076.06-08-61.01 N CAROLINE PL CITY OF DOVER RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 36 ED05-076.05-05-37.00 FORREST AVE G&I VI DOVER COUNTRY CLUB LLC RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 37 ED05-076.05-04-02.00 DOVER-HARTLY RD CHIOS INVESTMENTS LLC RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 38 ED05-076.05-01-11.01 FORREST AVE CITY OF DOVER- Mallard Pond RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 39 ED05-076.05-06-16.00 HEATHERFIELD WAY FIRST FLAG, INC R-8 and RG-2 ROS ROS ROS 40 ED05-076.05-07-10.00 PEBBLE VALLEY DR CITY OF DOVER R-8 ROS ROS ROS 41 ED05-076.05-06-31.00 HEATHERFIELD WAY FIRST FLAG, INC R-8 ROS ROS ROS 42 ED05-076.05-08-28.00 CHELSEA WAY CRANBERRY RUN MAINTENANCE CORP R-10 ROS ROS ROS 43 ED05-067.17-04-68.00 SWEETGUM DR CITY OF DOVER- Westfield R-8 ROS ROS ROS 44 ED05-067.17-04-69.00 ARBOR DR WESTFIELD MAINTENANCE CORP R-8 ROS ROS ROS 45 ED05-067.17-04-67.00 ARBOR DR WESTFIELD MAINTENANCE CORP R-8 ROS ROS ROS 46 ED05-067.17-01-39.00 S TURNBERRY DR TURNBERRY MAINTENANCE ASSOC RM-1 ROS ROS ROS City Council August 9, 2010 MI-10-11

2010 Comprehensive Rezoning: ROS Summary Table Page 2 of 4 ID # Parcel ID Property Address Owner Current Zoning Proposed Zoning Staff Recommendation PC Recommendation City Council Action 47 ED05-067.17-01-38.00 S TURNBERRY DR TURNBERRY MAINTENANCE ASSOC RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 48 ED05-067.17-01-01.00 N TURNBERRY DR TURNBERRY MAINTENANCE ASSOC RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 49 ED05-067.00-04-01.00 39 MAPLE DALE RD MAPLE DALE COUNTRY CLUB INC RC ROS ROS RC 50 ED05-066.00-01-07.00 236 KENTON RD STATE OF DELAWARE RM-1, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 51 ED05-066.00-01-07.03 5 W DENNEYS RD STATE OF DELAWARE RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 52 ED05-056.20-01-47.00 MAPLE GLEN DR MAPLE GLEN HOMEOWNERS R-8 ROS ROS ROS 53 ED05-056.20-01-46.00 MAPLE GLEN DR MAPLE GLEN HOMEOWNERS R-8 ROS ROS ROS 54 ED05-056.20-01-50.00 MAPLE GLEN DR MAPLE GLEN HOMEOWNERS R-8 ROS ROS ROS 55 ED05-056.20-01-49.00 MAPLE GLEN DR MAPLE GLEN HOMEOWNERS R-8 ROS ROS ROS 56 ED05-056.20-01-48.00 MAPLE GLEN DR MAPLE GLEN HOMEOWNERS R-8 ROS ROS ROS 57 ED05-057.17-01-70.01 126 MILLCREEK DR CITY OF DOVER- Mill Creek RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 58 ED05-057.17-02-35.01 8 GRINDING WHEEL DR STATE OF DELAWARE RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 59 ED05-067.05-02-19.00 MCKEE RD MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 60 ED05-067.05-02-19.01 1510 MCKEE RD FOX MEADOWS JOINT VENTURE R-8 ROS ROS ROS 61 ED05-067.05-02-19.00 MCKEE RD MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 62 ED05-067.13-01-82.00 OAKMONT DR CITY OF DOVER R-10 ROS ROS ROS 63 ED05-067.13-01-82.00 OAKMONT DR CITY OF DOVER R-10 ROS ROS ROS 64 ED05-067.13-01-82.00 OAKMONT DR CITY OF DOVER R-10 ROS ROS ROS 65 ED05-067.13-01-82.00 OAKMONT DR CITY OF DOVER R-10 ROS ROS ROS 66 ED05-067.13-02-34.00 OAKMONT DR CITY OF DOVER R-10 ROS ROS ROS 67 ED05-067.17-01-81.00 28 CARNOUSTIE RD FOX HALL PLANTATION CO R-10 ROS ROS ROS 68 ED05-067.18-01-66.00 1357 WALKER RD WALKER WOODS PARTNERS LP RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 69 ED05-067.14-03-01.00 OLD FORGE DR CITY OF DOVER- Hamlet R-10 ROS ROS ROS 70 ED05-067.14-02-61.00 OLD FORGE DR CITY OF DOVER- Hamlet RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 71 ED05-067.14-03-79.00 OLD FORGE DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC R-8 ROS ROS ROS 72 ED05-067.15-01-28.00 51 VILLAGE DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 73 ED05-067.15-01-01.00 HITCHING POST DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 74 ED05-067.15-01-01.00 HITCHING POST DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 75 ED05-067.15-01-76.00 45 QUAIL HOLLOW DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC R-8 ROS ROS ROS 76 ED05-067.19-01-01.00 HITCHING POST DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 77 ED05-067.19-01-25.00 HERITAGE DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 78 ED05-067.19-04-44.00 MONT BLANC BLVD FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R-8 ROS ROS ROS 79 ED05-067.19-04-45.00 41 HOMBERG CIR FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R-8 ROS ROS ROS 80 ED05-067.19-04-46.00 HOMBERG CIR FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R-8 ROS ROS ROS 81 ED05-067.19-04-48.00 109 MONT BLANC BLVD FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R-8, COZ-1 ROS. COZ-1 ROS. COZ-1 ROS. COZ-1 82 ED05-067.19-04-54.00 MONT BLANC BLVD FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 83 ED05-067.19-04-47.00 209 MONT BLANC BLVD FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 84 ED05-067.19-04-53.00 SAULSBURY RD FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 85 ED05-076.07-02-32.00 744 BICENTENNIAL BLVD CITY OF DOVER R-8 ROS ROS ROS 86 ED05-076.06-05-60.00 GEORGE WASHINGTON DR CITY OF DOVER RM-1 ROS ROS ROS 87 ED05-076.06-07-06.01 GEORGE WASHINGTON DR CITY OF DOVER RG-2 ROS ROS ROS 88 ED05-076.06-05-01.00 INDEPENDENCE BLVD CITY OF DOVER- Continental Park RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 89 ED05-076.06-04-26.00 43 LAMPLIGHTER LN THE GREENS TOWN MEETING ASSOC RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 90 ED05-076.06-04-26.00 43 LAMPLIGHTER LN THE GREENS TOWN MEETING ASSOC RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 91 ED05-076.06-02-12.01 GREENS OF DOVER CITY OF DOVER RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 92 ED05-076.11-01-36.00 SAULSBURY RD CITY OF DOVER- Saulsbury Park RG-1, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 City Council August 9, 2010 MI-10-11

2010 Comprehensive Rezoning: ROS Summary Table Page 3 of 4 ID # Parcel ID Property Address Owner Current Zoning Proposed Zoning Staff Recommendation PC Recommendation City Council Action 93 ED05-067.00-02-35.00 425 COLLEGE RD CITY OF DOVER IO ROS IO IO 94 ED05-067.00-02-23.00 COLLEGE RD SUNSET MEMORIAL GARDENS INC R-20 ROS ROS ROS 95 ED05-067.11-01-12.00 WOODCREST DR CITY OF DOVER R-8 ROS ROS ROS 96 ED05-067.15-05-30.00 BUTTNER PL OAKRIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 97 ED05-067.12-03-35.00 SILVER LAKE BLVD SILVER LAKE TOWNHOUSE COMM RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 98 ED05-067.12-03-35.00 SILVER LAKE BLVD SILVER LAKE TOWNHOUSE COMM RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 99 ED05-067.12-03-35.00 SILVER LAKE BLVD SILVER LAKE TOWNHOUSE COMM RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 100 ED05-067.12-03-36.00 SILVER LAKE BLVD SILVER LAKE TOWNHOUSE COMM RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 101 ED05-067.16-02-89.00 WALKER RD CITY OF DOVER- Richardson Park R-20 ROS ROS ROS 102 ED05-068.09-01-84.00 OVERLOOK PL THE OVERLOOK ON SILVER LAKE RG-3 ROS ROS ROS 103 ED05-067.16-02-90.00 N GOVERNORS AVE CITY OF DOVER R-8 ROS ROS ROS 104 ED05-068.13-01-02.00 N STATE ST WESLEY METHODIST CHURCH R-8 ROS ROS ROS 105 ED05-067.20-03-01.00 422 N NEW ST CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS IO ROS ROS ROS 106 ED05-067.20-03-02.00 414 N NEW ST CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS IO ROS ROS ROS 107 ED05-068.17-01-32.00 RODNEY RD WHATCOAT METHODIST CHURCH R-8 ROS ROS ROS 108 ED05-068.17-03-16.00 WASHINGTON ST CITY OF DOVER- Silver Lake R-8 ROS ROS ROS 109 ED05-068.17-03-25.00 ST JONES RIVER CITY OF DOVER- Silver Lake R-20 ROS ROS ROS 110 ED05-068.17-03-26.00 ST JONES RIVER CITY OF DOVER- Silver Lake R-20 ROS ROS ROS 111 ED05-077.05-02-48.00 230 KINGS HWY CITY OF DOVER- Silver Lake R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 112 ED05-077.05-04-48.00 PARK DR CITY OF DOVER- Memorial Park R-10 ROS ROS ROS 113 ED05-077.06-01-72.00 E LOOCKERMAN ST CITY OF DOVER R-10 ROS ROS ROS 114 ED05-077.09-05-14.00 COURT ST STATE OF DELAWARE IO, H ROS, H ROS, H ROS, H 115 ED05-077.09-05-16.00 410 LEGISLATIVE AVE STATE OF DELAWARE IO, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H 116 ED05-077.09-05-27.00 THE GREEN CITY OF DOVER- The Green RGO, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H 117 ED05-077.09-04-64.00 THE GREEN CITY OF DOVER- The Green RGO, H ROS, H ROS, H ROS, H 118 ED05-077.10-01-01.00 EAST AVE STATE OF DELAWARE IO, H ROS, H ROS, H ROS, H 119 ED05-077.14-01-19.00 S DUPONT HWY CITY OF DOVER- Paul's Property RG-2 ROS ROS ROS 120 ED05-077.13-01-32.00 S NEW ST CITY OF DOVER- Dover St. & New St. R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 121 ED05-077.13-01-30.00 S QUEEN ST STATE OF DELAWARE R-8 and CPO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 122 ED05-076.20-03-31.00 WESTVIEW TER CITY OF DOVER- Woodbrook R-10 ROS ROS ROS 123 ED05-076.20-03-33.00 WOODSEDGE RD CITY OF DOVER- Woodbrook R-10 ROS ROS ROS 124 ED05-086.05-01-01.00 1052 S GOVERNORS AVE APT IRRIG WOODBROOK DEV LLC R-10 ROS R-10 R-10 125 ED05-085.08-02-35.00 NEW BURTON RD CITY OF DOVER- Crossgates R-10 ROS ROS ROS 126 ED05-085.12-01-06.00 BLUE BEACH DR CITY OF DOVER- Mayfair R-8 ROS ROS ROS 127 ED05-085.12-01-02.00 BLUE BEACH DR CITY OF DOVER- Mayfair R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 128 ED05-085.11-01-53.00 TURNER DR CITY OF DOVER- Turner Park R-8 ROS ROS ROS 129 ED05-086.00-02-05.00 1547 S DUPONT HWY STATE OF DELAWARE CPO ROS ROS ROS 130 ED05-086.00-02-04.00 S DUPONT HWY STATE OF DELAWARE CPO ROS ROS ROS 131 ED05-086.00-02-15.00 16 S STATE ST STATE OF DELAWARE CPO ROS ROS ROS 132 ED05-086.06-01-01.00 45 S DUPONT HWY STATE OF DELAWARE R-20 ROS ROS ROS 133 ED05-086.06-01-01.00 45 S DUPONT HWY STATE OF DELAWARE R-20 ROS ROS ROS 134 ED05-077.18-02-92.00 ST JONES RIVER CITY OF DOVER IO ROS ROS ROS 135 ED05-077.11-03-43.00 HOLMES ST COUNTRY LIVING HOMES LLC R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ 136 ED05-068.19-02-85.00 SHADYBROOK DR ACORN FARMS LTD R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ 137 ED05-068.19-02-85.00 SHADYBROOK DR ACORN FARMS LTD R-8 ROS ROS ROS 138 ED05-068.19-02-86.00 N LITTLE CREEK RD CITY OF DOVER- Acorn Farms R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ City Council August 9, 2010 MI-10-11

2010 Comprehensive Rezoning: ROS Summary Table Page 4 of 4 ID # Parcel ID Property Address Owner Current Zoning Proposed Zoning Staff Recommendation PC Recommendation City Council Action 139 ED05-068.19-02-85.00 SHADYBROOK DR ACORN FARMS LTD R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ 140 ED05-068.19-01-31.00 NIXON LN CITY OF DOVER- Dover Park R-20 ROS ROS ROS 141 ED05-068.19-01-28.00 NIXON LN CITY OF DOVER- Dover Park R-20 ROS ROS ROS 142 ED05-068.19-01-30.00 NIXON LN CITY OF DOVER- Dover Park R-20 ROS ROS ROS 143 ED05-068.19-01-29.00 NIXON LN CITY OF DOVER- Dover Park R-20 ROS ROS ROS 144 ED05-068.15-01-05.00 ACORN LN CITY OF DOVER- Dover Park R-20 ROS ROS ROS 145 ED05-068.15-01-01.00 1210 WHITE OAK RD CITY OF DOVER- DoverPark R-20 ROS ROS ROS 146 ED05-068.10-01-63.00 TOWNSEND BLVD CITY OF DOVER- Williams Park R-8 ROS ROS ROS 147 LC05-068.10-01-02.00 TOWNSEND BLVD CITY OF DOVER- Williams Park R-8 ROS ROS ROS 148 LC05-068.10-01-02.00 TOWNSEND BLVD CITY OF DOVER R-8 ROS ROS ROS 149 ED05-068.10-01-63.00 TOWNSEND BLVD CITY OF DOVER R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 150 LC05-058.17-03-42.00 110 PERSIMMON CIR PERSIMMON PARK PLACE MHP ROS ROS ROS Planning Commission recommended that these be stricken from the rezoning application. City Council August 9, 2010 MI-10-11

CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION EXCERPT OF MINUTES FOR COMPREHENSIVE REZONING 2010: ROS ZONING July 19, 2010 The Regular Meeting of the City of Dover Planning Commission was held on Monday, July 19, 2010 at 7:00 PM with Chairman Friedman presiding. Members present were Mr. Friedman, Mr. Baldwin, Mr. Tolbert, Colonel Welsh, Mr. Nichols, Mr. Shomo, and Mr. Hemmig. Mr. Ambruso and Mr. Holt were absent. Staff members present were Mrs. Townshend, Mrs. Melson-Williams, Ms. Cornwell, Mr. Albert and Ms. Metsch. NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS MI-10-11 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS Zoning – Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council on proposed rezoning of 150 properties city-wide consisting primarily of City parkland, required open space within residential developments, cemeteries, State open space, and Maple Dale Country Club. The proposed zoning classification is Recreational and Open Space zone (ROS). a. Presentation by Staff b. Public Hearing c. Recommendation by Planning Commission Representative – Staff Mrs. Townshend stated that back in May Staff brought forward a text amendment creating the Recreational and Open Space Zone with the intention of bringing forward at a later date the map amendments to implement the Recreational and Open Space Zone. Mrs. Townshend further stated that State law requires that within eighteen (18) months of adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the City must proactively rezone properties accordingly. Staff has ensured that the Land Development Plan map, table, and the Zoning Map cross reference each other. In November 2009, City Council adopted the 2009 Comprehensive Rezoning. The Comprehensive Plan also called for the creation of an open space zone. Staff has reviewed the Land Development Plan and brought forward what was shown as open space lands in the Land Development Plan proposing to rezone those to Recreational and Open Space zone. Mrs. Townshend further stated that the lands fall into several different categories. One is City Parks in which all of them are included to be rezoned to Recreational and Open Space. The required open space within residential developments as open space, active recreational areas, stormwater management ponds that are owned and managed by Homeowners Associations and are already through the subdivision process restricted as their current use of open space; State open space such as the McClemens preserve along with a couple of other small State parcels; and cemeteries are also included as open space. The Maple Dale Country Club will be discussed later as there has been correspondence regarding that matter. 1

CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 19, 2010 Mrs. Townshend further stated that the proposal is to rezone approximately 150 properties Citywide to this classification. The Planning Office on June 3, 2010 sent a letter to all the owners of properties that are included in this proposal. Following that mailing, in June Staff met with Homeowner Associations that had questions regarding the rezoning of their property. Final Staff recommendation was brought forward for First Reading before City Council on June 28, 2010 and then referred to the Planning Commission for this evening. Approximately 3,000 public notice letters were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of anything that was part of the proposal to rezone to open space. Staff has fielded approximately 200-250 phone calls and information regarding the rezoning was placed in the Library, City website, and City Hall. The main question has been what is going to be built and are we building a park. The idea is that not that anything will be built; this is essentially a zoning map amendment to reaffirm open space where open space exists. Mrs. Townshend further stated that Maple Dale Country Club is a fairly large tract of open land that is currently a golf course and the zoning text included some developability in that. We did receive correspondence from the Maple Dale Country Club Board of Directors requesting that the City not act on rezoning the club at this time because they would like the opportunity to assess the impact it would have on the club. Mrs. Townshend further stated that Staff has received several correspondences regarding this matter. The first is an email from Larry McAllister, President of the Board of Maple Dale Country Club and a letter from Mr. McAllister dated July 12, 2010 again requesting that the City not move forward on this. Also related to Maple Dale Country Club we have an email dated July 19, 2010 from Mr. Frank Donnelly located at Pine Valley Road requesting that the Planning Commission not consider this matter at this point and time. Correspondence was received from Bob and Claire Sheppard who own property at 9 Saint Anne’s Court and 213 Charring Cross Drive supporting the open space rezoning in their vicinity which includes the open space City park land within Foxhall, Village of Westover, and Maple Dale Country Club. Correspondence was received from Lois Dunning located at Lamplighter Lane expressing concerns that with the rezoning there would be very strict stringent restrictions so that the property could not be used as a park, house, or a building and requesting that strict measures be in place. Correspondence received from Lawrence and Lillian Rogers located at 67 Lynnhaven Drive expressing concerns regarding the rezoning of property on I.D. #124. Also correspondence was received from Joe Petrosky regarding this property I.D. #124 as he is the property owner of this land asking that his property not be included in the rezoning as it is private property. Also, an email was received from John Still opposing the City rezoning of Maple Dale Country Club at this point in time. Correspondence from DNREC was received identifying three (3) pieces of property that they own: 236 Kenton Road, 5 W. Denny’s Road, and Grinding Wheel Drive stating that DNREC has no objection for the rezoning of their property. An Email correspondence was received from Ralph Reeb with the Department of Transportation dated July 14, 2010 stating for the parcel numbers #129 through #133 on the list they have no objection and that they are all wetland mitigation or stormwater retention and therefore a zoning change would not affect these parcels. Listed on the summary table is three (3) parcels that do not wish to be rezoned at this time and they are #49, Maple Dale Country Club which has requested that it not be rezoned to ROS at this time. #93, The City of Dover that has property located at 424 College Road that is a utility property that is not a park that was accidently picked up as a part of the parks and the City 2

CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 19, 2010 Manager has requested that this come out of the rezoning. #124, Property located at 1052 S. Governors Avenue, owned by Woodbrook Development, LLC. Mr. Petrosky has submitted in writing that this property be pulled out. Mr. Friedman questioned if anything could be built on these rezoned properties? Responding to Mr. Friedman, Mrs. Townshend stated that most of them are otherwise restricted. The case of City parkland would go through a process and anything that would be built would have to meet the requirements for Site Plan review and would come before the Planning Commission and would be subject to property owner notification. It does not change the way things could happen or significantly change what could happen. If anything it restricts and underscores the open space use of these properties. Mr. Tolbert questioned if it was to be approved and the owners of the land wanted to do anything wouldn’t a zoning variance be required? Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Mrs. Townshend stated that no because there are a number of permitted uses within the zone. Permitted uses are public and/or private parks and playgrounds, natural areas, woodland areas, public and private open space, athletic fields, game courts, basketball courts, recreation centers, picnic areas, pavilion and gazebos, public and or private swimming pools, boat ramps, docks, and fishing piers, golf driving ranges, baseball batting cages, golf courses, and country clubs, clubhouses and their associated meeting/activity rooms. Additionally, there are accessory uses and Conditional Uses as well. Mr. Friedman opened a public hearing. Mr. Roy Sudler, Jr. – 353 State College Road – Questioned why they are being rezoned primarily to an open space when you stated that the usage was very similar? Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mrs. Townshend stated that dating back to 1996 the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Dover has called for developing an Open Space Zone and applying it to open space in the City. What this does is underscore the open space use on those properties. Mr. Sudler further questioned if there were any disadvantages that you know of to rezone it to open space that a resident or citizen of Dover in the past has complained about? Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mrs. Townshend stated that no and that the only properties that could potentially be affected are the truly private properties that were already mentioned as #49 and #124 which is Maple Dale Country Club and the one on South Governors Avenue owned by Woodbrook Development, LLC. Mrs. Danita P. Reed – 49 Gristmill Drive – Stated that her issue even before the redevelopment is that her backyard is right where the playground open space is located and her yard is being used as a throughway to that piece of equipment that was placed there by the City. She has stated this before to some City Council members and her issue with the rezoning is how far is this rezoning going to go into her yard again or are you willing to place some type of fencing so people do not traipse through her yard to get to this playground? Responding to Mrs. Reed, Mrs. Townshend stated that the rezoning would only be applied to the property that is the park. It would not be applied to any of the adjacent residential properties. In terms of a fence or any type of screening between the parks, this is not part of the zoning process. It is something 3

CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 19, 2010 that you could make a request to your City Council members or to the City Manager to have that installed. Mrs. Elizabeth Ronston – 12 Yarmouth Way – Stated that they recently redid the pond that is in this area and she questions who would be responsible for the future maintenance. Will Cranberry Run Association still be responsible for the pond maintenance? Responding to Mrs. Ronston, Mrs. Townshend stated that yes they would. It does not change ownership or maintenance responsibility. Mrs. Ronston further questioned if the taxes would be reduced on this parcel at all? Responding to Mrs. Ronston, Mrs. Townshend stated that this would be a question for the Tax Assessor. Once the rezoning has passed, we will forward all information to the City Assessor who would determine if it changes the assessment. Mrs. Ronston further questioned regarding insurance because this is a pond and it is risky, she believes they have insurance on the open area at present, will they still need to maintain that? Responding to Mrs. Ronston, Mrs. Townshend stated that it is still under the ownership and maintenance responsibility of the Homeowners Association. Mrs. Ronston further stated that on page 2 of 6 on the Plan Item 30.41 ii: “provide a procedure or documentation for how community resources, inclusive of the recreation elements approved for the Residential Life-Style Community will be maintained for its residents in the event that any commercial, recreational, or otherwise associated portion of the community is dissolved or disbanded.” Does this mean that we have to present to the State what we plan to do in the future in case the subdivision dissolves? Responding to Mrs. Ronston, Mrs. Townshend stated no this would be if a property developed after rezoning and if it were to develop in accordance with this section of the Conditional Use. The Zoning Ordinance was applied to Cranberry Run and all the other developments that have already been approved and built and the open space turned over to the Homeowners Association. The Zoning Ordinance already specifies that the Homeowners Association is responsible for the ownership and maintenance of that open space. Mrs. Ronston further stated that her question was it seems that they have to present a plan for the maintenance of the open area, is she misreading it? Responding to Mrs. Ronston, Mrs. Townshend stated that this section would not apply to it. It would apply to a new development coming forward as a residential lifestyle community. Mr. George Gaudioso – 167 Maple Glen Drive – Stated that when he read this proposal on the internet he was confused because it would appear that a Homeowners Association that wanted to make a change within their open space area would have to have the permission of the City in order to do that. Responding to Mr. Guadioso, Mrs. Townshend stated that it is not specific to this ordinance; however, to Article 5, Section 10 of the Zoning Ordinance where there is a requirement for open space. Your development is in the process of going through this, it states that “the active recreation plan becomes a condition of the development and of the subdivision and must be maintained by the Homeowners Association.” That is not specific to this ordinance or to the Recreational and Open Space zoning provision; it is a virtue of all subdivisions when open space is set aside in the subdivision. 4

CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 19, 2010 Mr. Gaudioso further questioned when he reads this does this impact on enforcing the zoning of the land in other words, if there is a violation of zoning, who would handle it? Responding to Mr. Gaudioso, Mr. Friedman stated that if someone violated the Zoning Ordinance it would be handled by the Planning Staff of the City of Dover. Mr. Joe Pinson – 88 Pine Valley Road – Stated that he has some comments in reference to the new development applications, in particular the Comprehensive Rezoning 2010. I noticed the section of the proposed rezoning which controls the height of multiplex dwellings, such as high rise condos is limited to 35 feet. I commend you on the wisdom of selecting the 35 feet limit. Any multiplex building over 35 feet would be out of place in a residential neighborhood. I live in the Retreat neighborhood so I am concerned about how Maple Dale Country Club’s proposed townhouse and condo development will affect me. Condos and townhouses that are not taller than 35 feet are okay; however, please do not issue a variance to allow these condos to go to the proposed 65 feet. A 65 feet tall building in our residential area would be architecturally inconsistent. It would stand out and certainly not be in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood. You, the Planning Commission, are the only protection the Retreat area has against inappropriate development. Before allowing height variances, please come to our neighborhood, look around, and visualize what those monsters will do to our property values. Mr. Alan Simpson – 20 Merion Court – Stated that he has a copy of Section 30 of the Zoning Ordinance; however, he does not have the rest of the ordinance which has permanent uses as well as conditional uses such as horse stables. Is the permanent use and the conditional use both given notices within 200 feet? Responding to Mr. Simpson, Mrs. Townshend stated that yes they are. Any Site Plan or Conditional Use application that comes to the Planning Commission is subject to public notice. Mr. Frank Donnelly – 99 Pine Valley Road - Stated that mentioned earlier was the email that he sent this morning with his comments. He has questions regarding why the property owners adjoining these pieces of property were not invited by the letter that was sent out on June 3, 2010? It is very difficult to read the map without any detailed information and understand what the Planning Commission is trying to do. It seems in doing that it complicates the issue. The way that he understands the land management plan, it was to include a series of two meetings. He would assume that this was the first meeting. He understands that some properties were dropped prior to this meeting and he has not heard any explanations as to why those properties were dropped. One that comes to mind because it is in close proximity to his home would be the Kent Swim Club although it is private open space. Responding to Mr. Donnelly, Mrs. Townshend stated that the Kent Swim Club is not shown as open space in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Donnelly further questioned Ordinance #2010-12 that established the ROS district; however, it then set special conditions and he feels this is what is complicating the Maple Dale issue. It does not seem that what is done with the special conditions in subsections 30.4 and 30.41 where it allows Maple Dale Country Club to do a residential lifestyle community; it seems more like an oxymoron where we are allowing residential building in open spaces. He is hearing that none of this allows any building in these spaces; however, in difference this does allow building in the Maple Dale Country Club plot of land. Responding to Mr. Donnelly, Mrs. Townshend said that what she stated is that there is no development proposed as part of this. The Recreational and 5

CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 19, 2010 Open Space Zone changes are essentially a map change. Any development that would happen would be subject to either Site Plan approval or Conditional Use approval which would be a totally different process. She did not say no development could happen. Mr. Donnelly further stated that the issue with Maple Dale Country Club is that there is open litigation on it. Responding to Mr. Donnelly, Mrs. Townshend stated that they are not discussing litigation at this meeting. Mr. Donnelly further stated that it does not seem to be the proper time to make a change in the zoning. He also has some confusion as to why we would do this open space zoning when nothing is going to go on with the property at this time. He realizes that you have to do this some time because of the Comprehensive Plan; however, in relation to Maple Dale Country Club and maybe some other properties, it just does not seem to be correct to do for specific reasons when it could be done by petition and going through the process at a later date. He has asked that Maple Dale Country Club be tabled probably for different reasons than Maple Dale Country Club has. With regards to the Comprehensive Plan, he goes back to his issue regarding the overall plan and not enough explanation for the citizens of Dover and a lot of time spent with the governmental agencies who do not really own this land; however, they are the ones who were contacted and consulted with. Basically, the citizens of the adjoining lots were not contacted and he feels that this whole project should be tabled. You should go back to the communities around these pieces of property and give them an explanation regarding what you are doing and then move forward from that point of view. Mr. Jim Pearce – 33 Muirfield Court – Questioned that in rezoning all of this to Recreational and Open Space, does this entitle the City of Dover to ask the State and Federal governments for funds for maintenance and improvements? Responding to Mr. Pearce, Mrs. Townshend stated that no more than they would currently. Mr. Pearce further questioned with the increase in the amount of Recreational Open Space if you could ask for more funds? Responding to Mr. Pearce, Mrs. Townshend stated no. The City can apply for funds through the State through DNREC that administers a grant fund for parkland. The zoning of land is not relevant one way or another to the ability to apply for or receive Federal or State funding. Mrs. Janice Palmer – 112 Teak Court (Acorn Farms) – Stated that she had come in late and would like to know if anything has been discussed regarding this area. Responding to Mrs. Palmer, Mrs. Townshend stated that nothing has been discussed about this area specifically; however, in terms of the overview, one of the things that was shared is that this is a Zoning Map change and there is no development associated with the map change at this point. Any development activity would be subject to a totally separate application that would have a separate public notice procedure which would include mailed notices to property owners within 200 feet. Mrs. Palmer further questioned if she could be given an explanation of map change? Responding to Mrs. Palmer, Mrs. Townshend stated that the proposal is to take City park land, State open space, Homeowners Association open space, cemeteries, and the Maple Dale Country 6

CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 19, 2010 Club and put them in a zoning classification which is a land use classification as recreation and open space. It does not affect what is currently taking place on the property and does not indicate that anything that’s not happening now will be happening in the future. Dr. Stephen Schlesinger – 51 S. Prestwick Court – Stated that he received his letter regarding Maple Dale Country Club; however, would like to speak regarding another open space area. With regards to Maple Dale Country Club, he feels that Mr. McAllister is trying to rejuvenate the club and his attempts, he would hope, are successful. The other open space borders Division Street, Pennsylvania Avenue, and an alleyway. This space was not listed this evening for keeping it open space; however, he has been petitioning twenty-five (25) years ago to keep this as open space or as a park. He is supporting this to be an open space. Mrs. Townshend stated that she had talked with Dr. Schlesinger earlier today and indicated that it is possible. The park on the corner of Division and State Streets, for whatever reason, did not come up in the open space classification in the Comprehensive Plan so she encouraged him to state his comments for the record so that it is a reminder to go back and revisit those issues in the future and maybe bring them forward in the future for a similar zoning as they are City park properties. Mrs. Dorothy Adams – 102 Falmouth Way – Stated that she would like to know if there is a standard procedure for notifying people that are in the subdivisions that are affected because we did not get the June 3, 2010 information as well as information regarding this meeting. Responding to Mrs. Adams, Mrs. Townshend stated that the City notified on two occasions all property owners. In the case of Cranberry Run the Cranberry Run Homeowners Association owns and manages the open space areas associated with Cranberry Run. The Homeowners Associated would have received the letter that went out on June 3, 2010. All properties within 200 feet of the property proposed for rezoning would have received the notice that went out on June 30, 2010. Mrs. Georgeanna Windley – 725 Bicentennial Boulevard – Stated that she would like some clarification. First, she would reiterate that she hopes that you do review the public notification process as she feels it is very important. A lot of people in her neighborhood have no idea that this is going on and she feels that they would like to know. Second, we are changing from R-8/ COZ-1 to ROS/COZ-1 what does this mean? Responding to Mrs. Winley, Mrs. Townshend stated that COZ-1 is the Corridor Overlay Zone and is so by virtue of the road that the property is located on. If it is on McKee Road, Saulsbury Road, or Route 8, this is the Corridor Overlay Zone. R-8 is a one family residence zone that has a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet per dwelling unit. The ROS is the Recreational and Open Space Zone which is essentially the park zone. Mrs. Winley further questioned if this would affect taxes? Responding to Mrs. Winley, Mrs. Townshend stated that she does not believe that it would; however, all of this information will be forwarded to the Tax Assessor for that determination. Mrs. Terri Lafferty – 1261 S. Farmview Drive – Questioned where the open space was located within 200 feet of her home? Responding to Mrs. Lafferty, Ms. Cornwell stated that near the 7

CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 19, 2010 apartments off of South Farmview Drive on the other side of the ditch and owned by the City there is a little bit of open space and then there is Enterprise Business Park. Mr. Friedman closed the public hearing after seeing no one else wishing to speak. Mr. Hemmig moved to forward to City Council approval of MI-10-11 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS Zoning as presented this evening and recommend that they approve the rezoning of properties listed in the table as Items 1 through 150 with the exception that we would withdraw and exclude from the rezoning Items #49, designated as 39 Maple Dale Road; Item #93, designated as 425 College Road; and Item #124 designated as 1052 S. Governors Avenue, seconded by Colonel Welsh and the motion was unanimously carried 6-1 with Mr. Friedman abstaining from the vote as he is a property owner within 200 feet of an open space parcel. Mr. Ambruso and Mr. Holt were absent. Meeting adjourned at 9:48 PM Sincerely, Diane Metsch Secretary 8

City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book Created: October 23, 2006 Department of Planning and Inspections Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS DRAFT

City of Dover, Delaware Zoning Map Book MAP DISCLAIMER: By acceptance of this map material, you agree to the following: This map material is made available by the City of Dover, Delaware as a public service. The material is for reference purposes only, and the City makes no warranty, representation, or guaranty as to the accuracy of the material. You release the City, its agents, servants, and employees, from any and all liability related to the material, including its accuracy, availability, use, and misuse. In no event shall the City be liable for any direct or indirect damages suffered related to the use of this data including, but not limited to, physical injury, death, property damage, economic loss, or other consequential damages suffered by the Recipient or others arising from any inadequacies of the digital data or the Recipient’s use of this data. The material is in the public domain and may be copied without permission. Citation to the source would be appreciated. Any errors or omissions in the material should be reported to the City of Dover, Delaware’s Department of Planning and Inspections. This map is made a part of the Zoning Ordinance through the provisions of Article 2, Section 2 of the City of Dover Zoning Ordinance. Date: November 27, 1961 as amended on June 10, 1996 by City Council as amended on May 17, 2005 by City Council and other amendments. The zone boundaries go to the centerline of all roads; however they are not depicted that way on the map. The Zoning Map is a representation of the Zoning for the City of Dover. Contact the City of Dover's Department of Planning and Inspections for information regarding specific parcels at (302) 736-7010. 15 East Loockerman Street P.O. Box 475 Dover DE 19903. Map Created by: The Department of Planning and Inspections Date Map Created: 10-23-2006 Date Map Printed: 10-23-2006 Last Map Revision: 5-25-2010

Legend Dover Parcels Dover Boundary Source Water Protection Overlay Zone Tier 1 Tier 2 Zoning Tier 3 A Agriculture C-1 Neighborhood Commercial Property addresses are labeled. C-1A Limited Commercial C-2 Central Commercial C-2A Limited Central Commercial C-3 Service Commercial C-4 Highway Commercial CPO Commercial Professional Office SC-1 Neighborhood Shopping Center SC-2 Community Shopping Center SC-3 Regional Shopping Center RC Recreational and Commercial IO Institutional and Office M Manufacturing IPM Industrial Park Manufacturing IPM-2 Industrial Park Manufacturing- Technology Center R-7 One Family Residence R-8 One Family Residence R-10 One Family Residence R-15 One Family Residence R-20 One Family Residence RG-1 General Residence RG-2 General Residence RG-3 Group Housing RG-4 Multistory Apartments RG-5 Mid Rise Apartments RGO General Residence and Office RM-1 Medium Density Residence RM-2 Medium Density Residence ROS Recreational and Open Space MPH Mobile Home Park TND Traditional Neighborhood Design COZ-1 Corridor Overlay Zone H Historic District Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) 65 Noise Zone A 70 Noise Zone B 75 Noise Zone C 80 Noise Zone D CZ Clear Zone APZ I and APZ II Accident Potential Zones I & II

Street Index A: E09 CHARLES: F06 EISENHOWER: D07, ADAMS: E05 CHARRING CROSS: E04 D08 ALDER: F06, G05, G06 CHERRY: E06 ELECTRIC: E04, F04, ALONZO: D05 CHESTNUT GROVE: F05 AMERICAN: D06, D07, D03 ELM: E07 E07 CLARA: D05, D06 ENTERPRISE: E05 ANDREW: E04, E05 CLARENCE: E06 EVERGREEN: F07, F08 ANN: D05 CLYMER: D09 FAIRWAY: C03 ARBOR: D03 COBBLERS: D05 FARMVIEW: E04, E05 ARONIMINK: C03 COBBLESTONE: D05 FAWN: E04 ASH: D03 COLD SPRING: D04 FEDERAL: E07 AUGUSTA: C03 COLD SPRING PLACE: FIDDLERS GREEN: F06, BACON: C07 E04 G06 BAKER: F06 COLD SPRING: E04 FIELDSTONE: D04 BALTRAY: C02 COLLEGE: C04, C05, FOR CREEK: D04, D05 BALTUSROL: D04 C06, D04 FOREST CREEK: D05 BANK: E06, E07 COLLINS: E07, E08 FOREST: E05, E06 BARRISTER: E09 COLONY: D04, D05 FORREST CREEK: D05 BAY TREE: C08, D08 COLUMBIA: D06 FORREST: E04, E05 BAY: E08, F08, F09, G10, COMMERCE: E05 FREAR: D07, D08 H10 CONTINENTAL: D04, FREEDOM: D04, D05 BAYARD: D07, E07, E08 D05 FULTON: D06, D07, E06 BEDFORD: E05 COURT: E07, E08 GAGEN: E04 BELLRIVE: D04 COWGILL: E08 GALAXY: F11 BENNINGTON: E05 CRAWFORD: E09 GARDEN: C07, D07 BERTRAND: E05 CRESCENT: F06 GARFIELD: C08, D07, BICENTENNIAL: D05 DAFB RAMP: G10, H10 D08 BLACKHEATH: D03 DECLARATION: D05 GEORGE BLUE BEACH: F06 DELAWARE: D07 WASHINGTON: D05, BOGGS: C07, D07 DENNEYS: B03 E05 BRADFORD: D06, D07, DENNYS: B03 GIBBS: E06 E07, F07 DIVISION: D07, D08, GLENEAGLES: D04 BRADLEY: D08 E06, E07 GOODEN: F07 BRANDYWINE: C03, DOGWOOD: F06 GOVERNORS: C06, D06, C04 DOVER: F06, F07 E06, E07, F07 BROWN: D05 DUKE OF YORK: E07 GREEN BLADE: D04, BUCK: C07 DUPONT: B05, B06, C06, E04 BUCKSON: C07, D07 C07, D07, D08, E06, E07, GREENHILL: D07, D08, BULLDOG: E10 E08, F07, G06, G07 E07, E08 BURNING TREE: D03 DWIGHT: E05 GREENWAY: E04 BUTTNER: D05 E STONEBROOK GREGORY: C03 CARNOUSTIE: C03, PLACE: D04, E04 GRINDING WHEEL: B03 D03, D04 EAST SPRUANCE RD: GRISTMILL: B03 CAROL: D06 D08 H: E05, E06 CAROLINE: D04, E04 EAST: D07, E07 HALSEY: D08 CARVEL: C07, C08, D07 EDGEHILL: D07, D08 HAMAN: F05, G05 CARVER: E05 EDGEMONT: D07, D08 HAMPTON DR: E04 CECIL: D06, D07 HAMPTON: E04

HANCOCK: D09 KOREAN WAR MERION: C03, C04, D04 HARMONY: D04 VETERANS MICHAEL: C03 HARRISON: D08 MEMORIAL: A05, B06 MIFFLIN: E04 HARTLY: E04, E05 LAFFERTY: E10, F09, MILLCREEK: B03 HAYES: E05, E06 F10 MILLER: C07, E08 HAZEL: D07 LAKEVIEW: D07 MIMOSA: G05, G06 HAZELTINE: D03 LAMPLIGHTER: D04 MINIMA: E06 HAZLETTVILLE: E04 LAUREL: E08, F08 MINOR: E07 HEATHERFIELD: E03 LEGISLATIVE: E07 MISHOE: C05 HEMSTER: C03 LEIPSIC: B07, C06, C07 MITSCHEA: D08 HERITAGE: D05 LEPORE: C06, C07 MOCKINGBIRD: G05, HIAWATHA: C06 LEWIS MILL: D07 G06 HITCHING: D05 LIBERTY: D04, D05, E07 MONROE: E07, F07 HOLLY: F06 LINCOLN: E05, E06 MORIARTY: E09 HOLMES: E09 LINDEN: D09 MORRIS: F07 HOPE: E07 LITTLE CREEK: D10, MUIRFIELD: D04 HOPKINS: D09 D11, E08, E09 N COLD SPRING HORSEPOND: E10, F11 LOCUST POINT: G06 PLACE: D04 HOYLAKE: D04 LOOCKERMAN: D08, N FIELDSTONE CT: D04 HUNN: E08 E06, E07, E08 NEW BURTON: F05, I: E05 LOST TREE: D03 F06, G05 INDEPENDENCE: D04, LOTUS: F07, F08 NEW CASTLE: E08 E04 LYNN HAVEN: F06, F07 NEW: D06 INGRAM: E09 MADISON: D06, D07 NEW BURTON: E06 INVERNESS: C04 MAGGIES: E10 NEW: E06 IRMA: E06 MAHOGANY: D09 NEW CASTLE: E07 J: E06 MAPLE: D07 NEW: E07 JANEKA: F06 MAPLE PARKWAY: NIBLICK: C03, C04 JANES: F11 D08 NIMITZ: C07, C08, D08 JASON: C05 MAPLE: D08 NORTH: E04, E05, E06, JAWD: E05 MAPLEDALE: D03 E07 JEFFERSON: E05, F07 MARGARET: E09 NORTHDOWN: E04 JEFFRIE: C07 MARSH CREEK LANE NOTTINGHAM: G06 JUNE: E04 EAST: E04 OAK: D07, F06 KENNEDY: D08 MARSH CREEK LANE OAKMONT: D04 KENT: D07, E07, E08 WEST: E04 OAKRIDGE: D05, D06 KENTON: D03, D04, E04 MARSH CREEK: E04 OLD LAFFERTY: F09 KERBIN: E07 MARY: D06, D07 OLD LEBANON: H10 KESSELRING: F05, F06, MARYLAND: D07 OLD LEIPSIC: B06, B07, G06 MAYBERRY: E03, G06 C07 KEVIN: E03, E04 MAYS: F11 OLD WHITEOAK: C08 KINGS: D07, E07 MCAURTHER: C08, D08 ORCHARD: F07 KINGSTON: C03 MCDOWELL: C07, C08, PARK: D07, E07, F07 KIRKWOOD: D06, E06 D07 PAT LYNN: D06 KONSCHAK: F06 MCKEE: B03, C03, C04, PATRIOT: D05 KOREAN WAR C05, D05 PAUL REVERE: D05, VETERANS MEADOW GARDEN: E05 MEMORIAL: A05, E09, D05 PAUL: E06 F09 MEADOW: C03, C04 PEAR: D06 MEDINAH: C03 PEBBLE VALLEY: D03 MEETING HOUSE: D05

PENNSYLVANIA: D06, SHINNECOCK: D03, WASHINGTON: D06, D07, E07 D04 D07, E05 PERIWINKLE: D04, E04 SILVER LAKE: C06, WATER: E06, E07, E08 PEWTER: D05, E05 D06, D07 WATERFALL: B03 PHILLIP: C03, C04 SIMON: E05, E06 WEBBS: G06 PIN OAK: C04, D04 SLAUGHTER: E06 WEST: D06, E06 PINE VALLEY: C03, D03 SMITH: D07 WESTON: E06 PINE: F07 SMYRNA CLAYTON: WESTOVER: E04 PLAZA: B07, C07 E07 WESTVIEW: E06, F06 PORTMARNOCK: C02 SOUTH: E07 WESTWOOD: F06 PORTRUSH: C02 SPRING GARDEN: D07, WHITE OAK: C08, C09, POST: F06, G06 D08 D07, D08 PRESIDENT: F09 SPRUANCE: D08 WHITEMARSH: C03 PRESTWICK: C04, D03, STARLIFTER: F11 WILLIAMS: D06 D04 STATE: C06, D06, D07, WILLIS: D08 PUNCHEON: E09, F07, E07, F07 WILSON: C05, D05, D06 F09 STEVENSON: D08 WIND: C08, D08 QUAIL HOLLOW: D05 STEWART RUN: F06 WINGED FOOT: D03, QUEEN: D06, E06 STONE BROOK: D04, D04 RAILROAD: E06 E04 WINTERBERRY: F06 RAMP: F07, F09 STONEY: D03, E03 WOODBROOK: G06, RED OAK: C04, D04 SUNSET: D07, F06 G07 REECE: E06 SUSSEX: E07, E08 WOODBURN: F06 REED: E06, E07 SWEETGUM: D03 WOODCREST: C05, D05, REESE: E06 TALLOWICK: D03 D06 RIDGELY: E06 TAM O'SHANTER: C04 WOODEDGE: F06 RIVER: E07, E08 TARBURTON: D08 WOODFORD: F06 ROBERTA: E09 TAYLOR: D05 WOODMILL: E04 RODNEY: D06, D07 TEAL: D04 WOODROW: D05, E05 ROOSEVELT: F07, F08 TERRY: C05 WOODSTOCK: E05 ROSS: D06 THAMES: E04 WYOMING AVE: F06 ROUTE 1 RAMP: F09 THE GREEN: E07 WYOMING: F06 RUSTIC: B05 THE PLZ: E07 WYOMING AVE: F07 RUTHERFORD: E05 THORNTON: D09 WYOMING: F07 SACKARACKIN: E07 TOWN CRIER: D05 YEARSLEY: F06 SAINT ANDREWS: D04 TOWNSEND: C07, C08, SAINT ANNES: D04 D07 SALISBURY: E05 TRAFALGAR: E04 SANDWICH: D03 TROON: C03, D03 SAULSBURY: D05, E05 TURNBERRY: D03 SCARBOROUGH: B04 TURNER: G05 SCHOOLHOUSE: C05, UPLAND: D08 D05, D06 VANDAWAY: C08, C09, SCHOONER: C08 D09 SCIOTO: D04 VILLAGE: D05 SERVICE: E07, E08 VINE: E06 SHADOW: F06 VIRGINIA: D05 SHADYBROOK: D09 WALKER: D04, D05, SHANK: F06 D06 SHERWOOD: F06 WALNUT: D08 WAPLES: F06, F07

Zoning Map Index City of Dover Delaware A05 A04 A06 B03 B05 B02 B06 B08 B09 B04 B07 C04 C02 C03 C06 C07 C08 C09 C10 C11 C05 D06 D09 D03 D02 D04 D07 D08 D10 D11 D05 E02 E04 E10 E03 E05 E06 E07 E08 E09 F06 F08 F04 F11 F03 F05 F09 F10 F12 F07 G13 G06 G07 G09 G10 G11 G12 G05 H11 H10 H12 H13 I12 I13 -

A05 IO 2 IO 57 58 04 B03 B05 57 92 1886 80 328 2 B04 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book A04 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 1

A04 A06 Lewi sD r y Ln nn Pe St at e Hw y 1 82 32 IO 65 13 B04 SC-3 B06 B05 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book A05 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 2

B03 RM-1 9 36 5 36 1 36 6 36 7 35 5 3 3 36 2 9 8 34 35 5 4 1 3 34 7 0 33 35 6 34 33 3 2 34 8 33 4 33 0 33 20 2 20 0 C02 C03 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book B02 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 3

A04 RM-1 B02 B04 0 23 RM-1 1 2 40 0 23 22 8 21 21 5 40 4 8 22 3 217 40 2 2 21 9 21 3 20 9 41 21 0 9 6 20 211 21 20 6 6 1 41 20 7 40 0 211 21 5 21 8 5 42 20 RM-1 40 20 0 6 5 4 20 7 1 20 3 21 32 1 9 42 32 20 21 4 32 1 7 40 1 3 1 2 31 3 3 3 4 17 7 13 20 13 36 24 3 2 4 1 4 21 9 1 7 35 2 5 3 0 3 9 4 at 32 6 30 5 11 13 3 4 G 4 W 7 3 13 12 0 41 9 ri n 1 23 24 5 31 2 30 0 1 15 25 9 12 48 45 12 20 3 fa 9 11 9 7 12 7 6 er 1 8 3 2 ng 7 31 3 17 5 12 1 di 20 0 5 8 244 3 30 4 2 2 2 10 12 ll D 15 19 1 RM-1 1 16 31 9 Dr 30 0 12 11 0 8 53 2 7 2 2 3 20 4 W 20 6 30 1 24 24 0 4 k 30 8 3 5 2 12 12 he 9 ee 3 20 206 20 8 3 5 23 6 11 0 9 cr 30 0 1 25 0 RM-1 r 1 23 4 i ll 3 8 M 1 10 12 1 el D 21 3 20 6 18 11 21 1 5 ee 8 23 2 M 9 13 11 20 21 0 20 0 4 37 2 cK 10 1 115 7 2 2 23 0 2 2 11 21 1 4 23 2 8 r 8 7 26 RM-1 30 21 21 Rd 20 61 2 6 4 3 28 0 2 6 30 21 9 0 3 12 6 59 7 6 22 4 0 20 34 32 31 1 3 5 6 21 8 22 2 30 20 0 5 RM-1 0 33 5 7 11 6 55 12 21 22 22 2 36 3 9 ROS 37 24 3 1 5 28 11 5 11 53 1 30 21 8 1 38 39 13 4 5 9 0 8 1 22 Rd 30 6 20 112 4 7 RM-1 21 1 4 40 36 15 4 s 41 17 9 4 ey 2 2 21 2 42 1 2 110 56 10 5 7 nn 21 43 21 10 8 10 8 11 10 3 De 3 10 1 20 7 52 10 RM-1 8 20 3 10 6 10 8 W RM-1 20 6 4 4 1 48 20 10 20 0 10 1 44 6 10 0 3 10 10 8 0 37 11 10 2 5 2 11 4 2 4 7 10 2 Gr 7 11 35 10 10 9 is 9 6 6 10 11 6 t 8 25 23 R-15 m 7 11 118 10 21 1 ill Pl 11 13 1585 1 5 0 10 5 21 21 3 11 7 12 2 12 4 11 9 12 14 34 IPM 1 16 36 21 9 11 1 18 32 20 7 12 12 4 20 5 3 20 20 3 12 22 20 24 1 20 26 30 28 62 44 22 17 52 32 44 44 17 C02 C04 4420 10 ROS C03 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book B03 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 4

A04 68 57 8 2 A05 57 0 57 56 18 86 3282 18 72 Dr 32 IO e ci at 82 N As Du so po nt H h Dr w ec y reT a 17 law E 90 De pu s m Ca 17 80 17 Dr 60 17 44 p us D C-4 Tech r n olog y Dr dlers Way 17 Tod Cam 10 W C am p us Dr IO Rd 16 50 rough 18 32 De l a r Scarbo 16 wa 54 ec e h T Dr 17 06 18 32 Ce da Ch r as e D r 17 RG-2 00 1574 B03 RM-1 Craw B05 fo rd Ca r rol l Ave C-4 15 72 gh Rd Scarborou ROS IPM 8 IPM 15 8 15 5 25 15 6 5 1200 C03 C04 C05 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book B04 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 5

A05 A04 A06 13 65 3282 IO 16 50 13 65 vd Bl KW C-4 15 74 B04 B06 96 70 28 15 00 RC Ln 58 C-4 tic us N R D up IO Cr on tH 14 13 aw 81 65 fo w y 15 rd 30 C ar ro ll 14 A 41 ve 1572 14 09 13 87 Ln C-4 t ic us R W C-4 C-4 SC-3 14 26 14 50 14 14 15 28 N D up 13 on 80 tH w 14 84 y 50 13 31 12 IO C-4 1200 1200 ate Univ are St e rs aw ity D el C04 C06 1200 C05 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book B05 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 6

A06 A05 St at e H w y 1 13 65 RC 3 RC B05 B07 13 65 SC-3 RC 13 65 12 31 RC O ld L e ip s ic Rd C-4 31 SC-1 11 11 25 12 12 N Du po 11 65 nt Hw y IO C05 C07 120 0 C06 City of Dover Delaw are Zoning Map Book B06 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 7

8 B08 C08 Dr on 13 4 en P l 136 Su tt 17 6 A 13 9 re 10 5 r 21 Ln 21 15 6 i Ma u 10 7 11 15 13 7 Dr nC 105 8 ee 103 13 5 13 21 3 el le 10 1 10 Tr 11 1 mo 6 MHP 13 3 h 9 4 1 Mic rsim 21 4 12 10 9 on 111 7 13 1 e 10 7 RG-2 12 2 Dr 5 P m 5 21 2 10 5 112 MHP 12 0 K urt 211 110 116 114 m 3 10 1 10 3 si 113 12 10 8 Pl er 117 10 6 san 118 12 3 3 119 Su 12 1 P 12 1 7 115 15 12 8 12 3 0 119 11 21 0 118 50 19 12 0 23 20 9 Pl 117 27 6 12 2 129 127 en 20 8 Kar 31 MHP 14 12 4 31 205 20 7 18 71 133 1 35 22 12 6 135 130 12 8 1 inch = 500 feet 62 206 26 58 13 7 13 2 MHP 67 11 5 39 50 54 20 4 139 13 4 113 l 63 13 6 111 hP 59 10 9 B et 43 51 67 14 1 20 2 10 7 10 3 55 63 20 3 10 5 10 6 35 47 59 10 55 r 31 4 e D 3 10 5 27 51 Dr os ro s 10 4 on 10 8 47 Pl 119 P ri m 43 56 60 8 o rd 2 don 0 23 MHP 39 10 G or 108 11 7 r eC MHP G 28 3 P rim 10 7 115 10 1 110 19 46 11 13 8 42 t 2 106 t 9 117 15 nC 24 135 38 10 MHP 21 4 15 10 4 Dr ar 34 15 13 7 112 10 2 lch 0 o ly 13 6 9 3 14 1 139 W e 14 2 6 19 111 5 C 11 5 14 3 114 11 134 3 11 23 8 11 1 4 8 7 4 10 9 14 0 14 2 7 10 7 27 ROS 10 10 5 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS 3 9 31 A 11 12 110 MHP 1 B07 Hw y C07 14 00 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book Stat e August 9, 2010 14 00 CPO 98 Jul 21, 2010 9 97 Dr RC 97 za 9 Pla RC RC Rd Le ip sic RC ic R d RC ip s Dr Le L in e O ld RC A06 B06 Fin is h C06 -

9 B09 C09 1 inch = 500 feet IPM-2 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS C08 B08 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book August 9, 2010 41 31 t Vernel C l 6 53 30 8 53 3 54 0 9 53 53 53 5 53 4 4 53 7 54 MHP 2 1 2 54 54 81 0 81 80 8 D r 81 5 r ell 6 3 1 54 54 53 80 6 Far11 81 3 71 4 5 65 8 54 80 4 Jul 21, 2010 54 8 80 2 80 9 71 2 52 9 0 55 80 7 71 0 D r 7 is 54 inn 55 2 80 5 70 8 71 3 Mc G 1 80 3 70 6 711 55 4 9 80 70 9 4 5 1 70 4 61 4 55 70 2 70 7 61 2 52 7 3 70 5 61 0 50 0 55 6 55 70 0 611 Dr 24 70 3 60 8 re y 110 60 6 31 2 A ud 1 60 4 60 9 31 4 52 2 34 30 7 30 5 70 60 5 60 7 51 8 52 0 52 3 52 5 A 60 2 30 9 30 30 4 60 3 d Ct 33 31 3 51 6 51 9 52 1 60 0 lla 1 56 51 4 51 7 41 4 n t Pl Ho 55 30 1 30 2 41 2 41 6 ore 31 5 23 51 5 41 0 Mo 46 M olly C 31 45 3 511 51 3 40 8 411 320 50 4 50 8 40 6 41 7 50 6 22 6 40 4 40 9 42 0 Weave r Dr 502 22 3 40 2 40 7 32 2 50 9 22 4 40 5 42 2 50 7 r 42 4 41 9 503 505 Ci 32 4 50 1 22 1 43 3 42 6 42 1 14 4 on 2 3 904 906 908 910 91 2 m 42 5 4 14 6 Jona than Dr i m 22 42 7 14 8 l 5 9 90 2 s 2 14 2 nP 21 - 1 32 6 r 43 42 9 15 0 91 4 Pe 2 0 ree 7 14 M au 2 905 90 7 r 15 2 nD 32 8 901 903 A tto 19 104 10 6 14 8 15 4 14 14 1 Su 1 7 110 112 21 7 21 13 8 10 8 114 12 216 14 9 136 B07 C07

B08 IPM-2 C08 C09 C10 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book B09 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 10

B02 B03 R-8 42 42 Rd ys ne en D W 5 RM-1 236 41 C03 ROS RM-2 15 21 5 21 9 211 R-15 21 2 k Ct 15 20 6 a rn o c 207 5 10 P o rt m 21 Por 6 20 3 10 trus h Ct 25 y Rd 2 10 12 16 7 B a ltra 20 28 8 24 D03 4 D02 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book C02 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 11

B03 B02 96 4420 B04 IPM 43 1585 44 62 ROS R-15 1 10 R-8 1 19 M 2 3 10 10 4 5 cK 10 10 1722 6 19 ee 10 5 3 R-15 19 1565 R 1 8 d 10 0 5 10 19 1 0 2 171 169 t 10 9 11 11 1 19 16 7 86 C 0 15 re 3 11 11 2 3 4242 R-8 18 5 7 4 11 18 8 16 11 sk 11 M 5 ino 6 ap 11 4 1 18 4 11 RM-1 12 6 le 11 11 7 4 16 3 Se 8 5 8 G 16 2 11 12 11 len 16 R-8 R-8 9 161 2 0 D 11 2 1 R-8 12 12 ROS 9 2 r R-8 ROS 12 12 1 6 3 0 12 13 16 0 7 4 15 8 13 13 12 6 14 1 12 5 8 12 14 5 Ni 7 R-8 14 Dr bl i 0 3 13 ck R-8 te 0 rt h Ct 4 ga 13 6 138 No 2 9 10 203 7 3 7 11 11 6 9 5 12 1 10 Mi 110 ch 3 4 ae 11 R-8 l 6 8 211 Ct 11 21 9 4 2 12 12 9 12 22 3 6 13 3 Dr 7 5 13 0 3 Ken Brandyw s 13 7 ing in e ton 13 4 6 Ct 9 5 142 4 2 23 2 11 Hems 23 6 t ed Ct 24 1 ROS 146 24 5 24 10 r 0 150 ow D 24 1494 2 8 4 R-8 24 9 24 8 15 4 Me 3 25 3 ad 15 252 21 C t 2 16 ay 27 25 F a i rw 6 RG-3 2 C02 C04 31 14 26 0 35 3 18 26 3 34 5 Ct 11 9 35 28 2 go 2 7 ry Gre 341 34 5 7 35 0 26 9 4 26 39 33 7 t lip C 6 26 Phil R-10 8 236 33 1 33 6 35 11 Tr oon R d 8 271 38 32 3 327 1 9 13 34 27 27 6 h 22 31 9 t W h it e m ar s 5 C 30 2 27 5 309 28 2 27 9 10 6 RM-2 Pine Valley Rd 305 301 2 14 18 28 297 6 293 29 28 0 3 289 28 7 286 282 29 4 279 278 29 1 275 29 29 271 274 8 5 7 30 R-20 4 29 9 267 26 6 9 26 25 2 30 5 8 31 5 2 23 25 29 32 Me 6 oni 4 2 1 28 Ar r io 3 k nR in 27 R-10 m 39 32 5 5 d Ct 23 4 33 0 29 26 2 2 5 17 13 25 5 28 5 20 4 338 ROS ROS 5 R-10 19 0 33 9 27 6 9 22 dinah C 10 6 26 20 6 Me 25 24 6 8 36 35 2 7 17 3 6 19 38 RC t 0 5 6 36 39 2 9 18 R-10 37 2 2 6 16 38 41 8 1 4 R-10 15 7 13 12 3 40 0 41 9 429 8 25 11 13 7 2 12 Tr o o 11 R-15 n Rd 44 4 437 10 7 111 0 56 R-10 55 4 A ug 28 11 56 0 u sta 2 44 7 546 Ct 53 8 51 8 0 30 0 52 8 500 48 D02 D04 99 564 D03 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book C03 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 12

B04 B03 B05 1200 1585 15 65 IO IPM 1200 15 25 ROS D r Mc Br 3 ROS anR-8 Ke e dy win Rd e 0 20 15 06 R-8 20 4 15 06 15 00 Me 211 20 8 ad ow 203 Dr 21 2 14 90 21 6 14 22 80 0 22 4 14 68 22 74 14 8 4 60 1 232 111 10 6 14 9 11 11 5 0 4 M 11 11 9 4 12 11 8 46 3 14 12 12 7 2 13 12 1 6 13 0 C03 11 14 30 12 C05 85 15 22 12 14 83 12 M 55 12 12 81 271 20 14 14 00 12 1243 27 5 53 R-8 13 12 90 51 12 CPO 41 13 70 80 3 13 13 Col 14 70 7 le vd 14 ge Bl 5 85 Pa 1221 IO e 3 Topaz 11 on 11 rk er st 5 11 15 Min 7 Dr em 14 3 9 0 Cir al G 10 11 2 11 Ct 6 3 6 7 11 8 10 46 7 2 20 10 45 9 10 14 0 2 1 47 6 20 6 21 46 5 98 Sc 20 5 45 12 21 2 ar 0 9 46 1 bo 21 21 3 8 45 ro 4 22 45 7 ug 21 7 4 44 12 82 45 h 8 22 3 Rd 255 21 2 1 44 22 23 24 7 6 9 CPO 23 22 0 43 9 23 0 R-20 22 9 45 5 43 l 15 6 22 44 05 lP 1 1 2 31 1 12 CPO 2 pa 24 23 21 19 30 44 43 3 23 5 R-10 O 31 0 2 6 8 7 20 14 30 9 43 42 3 31 ee 27 0 4 19 31 43 cK 3 5 22 18 4 32 0 3 M 22 2 18 31 7 43 42 21 20 7 26 32 4 6 17 8 31 2 6 9 Rd 7 1 42 41 19 16 33 2 6 5 32 5 42 1175 33 41 5 41 9 6 8 IO 15 18 8 7 32 9 41 Ct d 33 R-10 18 0 7 14 33 R 40 16 it e 0 7 3 411 46 34 05 ge 12 a n 38 17 429 M 13 7 10 z 48 0 9 le er Ta n 16 3 41 0 ol 40 C-2A io 4 1 3 C 13 14 n 11 ROS R-10 ess Ct 47 2 6 R-10 8 40 21 42 12 3 43 34 43 7 10 t 6 kC 45 d t 2 51 34 R-10 R 14 6 13 C 40 34 e 10 in 8 RG-2 10 ar CPO 19 tw ic in IO 06 P m 7 10 ua 0 e rn 15 39 Aq 39 15 ak In v re s O 35 11 2 22 19 5 15 24 116 6 29 14 r D03 D05 NP 29 33 20 16 142 149 D 31 18 14 10 6 350 D04 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book C04 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 13

B05 B04 B06 1200 De l aw a re Stat e Un iv e 12 00 rs it y 1200 IO Rd ge le C ol d Ol M Rd IO ge 42 5 l le 12 00 Co 65 0 0 36 5 32 38 C04 C06 3 RG-5 Mish Rd M M ish 35 38 40 2 a ol 5 1 ilm 3 St oe W 35 Ja ra ita Ve St so R St St 10 RM-2 d Way n M 33 R-20 ym on 5 5 a t R 1255 35 9 nS 33 so 5 1 Ja 31 1 32 5 0 88 43 43 RG-2 12 RM-2 CPO R-20 9 29 1 29 RM-2 C 25 5 on w IO 21 el 12 lS R-20 t 12 01 ROS IO R-8 C ol 25 6 15 le R-20 R-20 ge RM-1 P IO D ar 17 r R-8 k 1 9 er Terry Cir 6 21 25 ROS st Dr 8 5 29 R-20 5 in 85 25 estm 93 8 92 0 R-20 W 93 1 8 92 92 9 6 91 92 92 3 5 4 92 92 91 7 92 2 1 92 2 91 92 91 5 9 0 92 0 91 3 RG-5 91 7 88 0 S ch R-8 R-8 91 91 4 R-8 91 8 8 91 6 911 W o odc 915 913 91 2 o olh M 90 9 1 91 6 91 3 11 75 91 4 914 910ou s 90 7 re s 911 e Ln 24 911 91 2 90 8 IO 5 t Dr 90 9 90 9 90 6 90 5 W ils IPM 90 3 90 7 91 0 90 7 on D 90 8 90 4 90 1 90 5 RG-2 245 90 5 90 2 90 6 89 9 r M 90 3 cK 90 3 90 0 ee 90 4 89 7 Rd 90 1 D04 D06 IO 90 1 902 89 8 895 D05 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book C05 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 14

SC-1 B06 B05 N Du po B07 nt H wy 1165 11 59 11 51 1131 C-4 ns w Do 11 r 41 Dov e 10 01 SC-2 RC IO De are S 1200 law tate Un iv 91 9 er sit y SC-2 12 00 90 5 88 9 87 9 SC-2 86 C-4 5 80 1 85 C olle ge R d 9 IO C-4 76 4 7 83 C05 R d ic C07 s IO ip 8 Le 72 9 77 N SC-2 N State St Du pont 1060 1 74 C-4 Hw y C-4 RG-1 8 75 7 73 10 75 73 8 0 10 8 9 36 10 7 21 7 10 1027 CPO Hi a watha Ln 6 C-4 100 70 IO 6 69 42 6 65 C-1A 05 10 1 86 68 72 RG-3 36 24 30 r RG-3 Lep or e R d eD 62 nu 6 55 970 65 S ilv er Ve RG-3 C-2A 953 967 672 58 RG-3 7 4 65 64 4 0 8 9 6 6 958 66 64 64 5 63 L ak e RG-3 Vi s RG-3 41 943 951 1 64 ROS 4 ta 44 65 RM-1 37 e 11 3 N State St 111 801 6 Av 637 Blvd 40 941 64 109 RG-3 Overl ook Pl RG-3 950 102 112 931 104 110 106 10 8 23 CPO 26 22 CPO 9 90 16 2 12 9 1 90 80 0 233 R-20 225 C-2A CPO D05 D06 D07 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book C06 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 15

B07 B06 MHP e th Pl 12 116 B08 MHP 11 2 6 11 4 11 5 11 B 6 133 Go 11 4 12 2 12 4 do 13 1 12 0 n Pl RC r 11 8 11 7 122 12 0 98 A 14 00 500 St at e Hw y 1 s ic R d O ld Leip Pl a Leip s RC za r ic R D d CPO 5 88 5 85 1 80 1 74 C-4 R-8 76 4 C 06 82 5 C 08 82 1 82 81 4 7 SC-2 81 82 3 81 0 ROS 80 6 9 81 76 2 5 80 80 5 8 80 80 1 4 80 0 645 63 5 63 3 63 7 63 1 N 63 9 9 64 7 9 im 64 62 Nim i RG-2 t zR 79 7 73 7 e d 0 62 n Av i tz 0 5 co 66 63 2 62 R-8 Rd 65 2 64 6 63 8 84 9 64 2 64 0 05 co 63 6 7 65 Ba 1 n Ba 19 3 62 3 25 Ct 4 82 5 83 3 6 91 81 7 83 61 9 12 8 11 6 20 80 3 7 79 5 61 6 67 C-4 26 30 79 61 3 78 R-8 82 4 1 9 81 2 81 8 83 61 4 78 91 7 0 80 6 90 7 IO lvd 80 0 7 89 1 88 3 78 79 5 ic B 88 7 1 79 6 87 9 60 72 78 C-4 0 86 3 86 7 87 5 C-4 3 87 1 0 78 ffer R-8 Rd 77 78 6 85 55 7 914 6 5 0 re 54 65 R-8 65 9 Je 77 po 6 C-4 5 89 0 76 4 85 7 88 4 88 8 5 88 0 1 r 76 rD 85 87 4 Le 86 6 8 54 87 0 70 75 1 53 3 r 9 84 rD 69 lle 76 7 85 55 0 5 2 96 3 0 8 a Mi 85 54 95 5 95 9 pe 8 75 Dr 71 75 84 R-20 7 1 6 3 4 4 95 1 84 96 Dr 3 2 74 8 94 65 10 1 64 6 B 3 75 83 97 99 7 0 9 ggs 7 63 9 69 84 94 RG-3 50 8 ucks 73 5 74 83 5 4 3 99 8 1 7 2 68 4 Bo 63 62 12 63 6 on 72 73 84 93 9 95 8 96 6 97 94 6 6 8 83 0 R-8 5 7 94 RG-3 e 14 80 8 1 95 4 nu 5 6 6 Dr 71 83 93 0 99 Ve 1 1 7 2 9 73 6 5 97 4 59 5 67 0 82 7 98 9 61 2 C-1A 83 RG-3 93 93 98 l 2 ok P Dr 71 72 82 1 6 99 4 1 1 Ove rlo 9 5 4 3 58 66 55 4 92 97 99 98 12 6 3 6 81 82 7 93 RG-3 12 4 65 R-8 58 71 8 70 3 1 12 2 3 8 9 2 98 2 9 97 11 4 11 6 8 96 98 82 8 5 81 92 75 12 0 67 64 92 95 C-4 11 8 5 71 5 4 3 8 7 0 8 0 0 82 95 9 59 64 81 1 vd 0 91 9 92 3 97 95 7 Bl 4 2 9 80 94 97 80 6 32 61 7 d 81 6 91 92 5 96 95 96 4 5 4 5 Dr 0 96 62 6 3 6 ns 94 R-8 81 0 N en 93 93 96 5 Bu c 60 2 6 93 7 95 7 R-8 k 7 9 11 91 0 56 Du 80 1 94 2 93 95 To C-4 6 8 92 94 2 w 4 1 R-8 0 po n 61 80 3 92 4 93 Dr 79 4 90 7 93 6 3 9 91 93 el tH 9 2 93 0 91 93 rv 8 5 r 5 wy 90 Ca lD 55 92 93 RG-3 5 82 el 7 92 0 93 22 1 91 2 90 92 1 ow 54 4 1 2 7 6 7 81 85 91 92 51 54 cD 0 55 93 R-8 4 8 R-8 3 90 1 4 3 53 5 90 2 84 91 91 5 M 6 82 90 2 D 08 1 D 06 911 0 7 C-4 83 3 9 92 5 54 2 5 8 D 07 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book C07 - Ju l 2 1, 20 10 Com prehensive Rezoning 2010: RO S August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 16

B08 B07 B09 500 IPM-2 A 65 St at e H w y 1 C07 C09 R-8 St at e ROS Hw y ROS 1 52 3 513 5 52 53 51 1 ROS 1 Scho one 0 53 92 3 1 3 A 54 r 50 44 1 3 53 0 52 4 W 44 9 53 ay 43 IPM-2 2 35 7 RM-2 54 5 3 4 43 5 52 35 5 2 43 3 7 0 43 ROS 1 34 35 1 52 34 8 3 1 43 9 385 3 6 34 9 4 42 RM-2 51 2 7 54 7 54 4 42 5 7 2 4 43 50 34 5 42 3 6 1 4 50 42 1 RM-2 51 0 3 34 R-8 99 2 5 N 4 7 34 4 30 8 42 1 9 im 4 2 42 6 42 4 4 r R-8 52 4 D itz A 22 0 7 e l An 41 98 9 4 E 5 rv or R 3 42 1 8 9 48 41 r 4 3 8 ch 44 d 33 a W D Ln 40 R-8 8 43 5 C 3 1 4 d 99 34 in 3 41 n 990 5 36 6 d 42 33 9 41 D WW 9 7 1 RM-2 2 6 r 5 2 41 i 7 98 41 9 33 49 3 4 45 33 41 41 11 r RM-2 5 28 lD 5 4 d 95 4 2 41 kR 40 9 el R-8 0 3 2 9 1 96 40 32 17 Oa 95 w 95 o e 7 40 h it 6 94 3 99 C-2A cD 0 15 8 r 94 41 3 3 2 7 D W 4 3 32 2 5 40 M 7 d RM-2 2 RM-2 95 11 24 40 7 39 d kR 2 e l 32 0 3 3 40 40 5 11 Oa 33 32 i 14 f 8 3 16 20 55 11 ar e 94 39 Vo n d 27 h it 19 2 8 13 98 7 14 14 9 3 G dW 4 31 6 94 38 32 Ol 13 12 1 3 4 40 R-8 Pl 13 90 0 29 7 39 90 5 30 R-15 30 3 13 78 a w ay 94 33 38 4 3 30 13 25 d Ma 3 32 8 5 Ba 40 1 35 in 13 3 1 31 54 r th 3 8 32 rW 3 3 yT 28cA 2 7 R-8 17 ai 2 307 3 8 1 re Dr 2 13 9 1 38 82 37 3 3 0 3 202 34 60 D07 D09 F 12 ur 5 5 eR 13 Dr 32 9 3 36 32 31 309 d 3 30 55 1317 52 D08 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book C08 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 17

B09 B08 24 11 23 89 2 23 3 81 R-8 67 23 55 23 43 IPM 23 99 22 89 101 R-8 22 10 10 R-20 2 22 04 21 03 21 96 80 21 IPM-2 R-8 R-15 21 10 Rd 20 ak 68 te o C08 C10 hi 20 R-20 W 38 20 12 19 10 RM-2 38 5 IPM-2 A A 65 11 St R-15 31 at e H w y 51 1 D08 D10 71 D09 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book C09 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 18

B09 R-8 Ap 24 ril 24 33 Dr Rd 21 70 ak 24 24 te o 11 23 hi 56 W 24 89 34 24 23 81 17 23 24 41 67 24 16 24 00 23 24 3 2 55 23 3 43 6 99 12 IPM 76 23 42 5 23 22 23 Ln 4 7 wl 12 12 ark 3 22 92 do 2 9 ea 12 10 M 1 1 12 R-8 6 10 3 0 12 102 R-8 119 1 Ln 119 5 10 v 3 118 Do 11 e g 5 n in 22 10 11 ur 4 6 10 11 R-20 11 1 Mo 11 4 2 11 Pu rp 61 le 15 3 M 7 117 ar 117 2 ti n 3 W ay 5 R-8 4 R-8 5 114 C09 9 C11 6 110 9 10 8 RM-2 A Rd Long Po int 802 A D09 D10 D11 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book C10 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 19

C10 65 A 802 70 APZ II D10 D11 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book C11 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 20

C02 C03 2 R-15 4 23 6 ROS 41 R-10 2 36 R-20 42 50 46 RM-2 42 18 89 R-10 D03 A 1617 E02 E03 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book D02 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 21

C03 C02 Tr oo n R d Ca C04 ROS R-10 rn R-10 ou 51 8 500 480 s ti t 300 99 564 ic h C eR 54 7 47 1 d B lac kh 47 9 31 S a ndw 51 5 1 52 5 50 5 7 236 89 56 5 eath Ct 56 1 71 79 20 16 16 R-10 88 15 15 26 61 22 51 74 21 t d kC 19 R P in e V a l le y 55 36 s t w ic 31 62 72 Ci r 52 60 S P re 43 W h ea tle y 42 50 7 51 t 51 49 6 9 eC RC 11 49 13 t Tr e 10 40 45 Lo s 14 27 46 29 18 Ma 36 p le d RM-2 42 22 38 a le Rd R-10 34 28 R-10 30 26 18 89 24 39 35 29 41 39 37 27 25 23 15 NT 49 RM-1 ur 13 11 RM-1 51 58 53 nb RG-2 55 23 16 55 er 11 Dr 52 ry 25 27 29 ROS 9 9 15 R-8 ROS Rd 5 39 S Tu r n 5 ve b e rr 59 ROS 4 43 1 57 ro yD Dr G 45 61 ut 63 Tay r s tn lo r 1 69 C he 3 K en ton 45 Rd 0 17 6 10 71 R-8 6 2 8 Ar 5 10 2 bo 17 D02 D04 4 10 Bu r 172 10 rD 5 6 16 10 r R-8 8 9 ni 1 13 1 10 10 11 1 12 8 ng 16 13 5 48 3 16 7 3 14 Tr 12 7 38 11 11 0 11 4 ee 7 12 3 15 5 16 16 15 1 119 R-8 5 2 11 19 14 11 Rd Ct 1 0 16 7 Shi sh nne 7 4 11 11 21 115 coc 7 A 11 15 14 kR 19 23 6 18 111 4 11 d 25 R-8 21 4 12 6 23 8 2 13 11 8 20 6 2 12 0 10 22 27 3 25 15 14 7 103 12 12 2 5 116 16 8 0 5 22 15 14 12 2 12 27 8 11 20 28 12 24 14 0 7 29 12 1 30 12 12 9 12 5 35 26 12 4 Sw 9 26 13 9 10 3 12 31 4 11 6 38 4 ee 14 7 6 1 28 33 10 12 2 8 tg 4 39 11 15 13 0 113 10 10 R-8 44 14 Ha 1 0 um 2 3 30 9 ze 40 13 36 12 6 10 ltin 35 10 8 0 Dr 9 5 eR 44 52 48 19 13 13 5 13 6 12 11 6 d 56 3 2 10 45 48 13 37 2 1 23 9 16 62 4 13 11 13 5 49 52 15 18 13 7 12 0 ROS 2 R-8 53 21 6 8 10 55 24 13 12 12 1 6 41 59 27 8 1 14 13 4 RM-1 59 63 12 8 75 71 0 7 41 63 67 33 14 20 2 11 3 20 6 178 182 2 41 67 2 14 20 4 11 41 5 2 4 1 d 43 1 14 6 41 71 10 1 18 20 6 eR 4 10 5 32 49 17 4 6 11 10 75 10 7 10 0 14 8 3 3 s ti 111 10 4 17 8 20 20 41 6 79 113 10 8 40 0 17 7 14 2 ou 11 R-8 117 44 41 83 119 112 20 5 10 8 a rn 8 14 12 3 116 15 6 17 5 10 21 0 WC R-8 1 99 9 30 4 15 0 12 5 10 1 20 Pebb 12 2 7 12 9 16 6 13 12 6 5 10 8 17 30 97 30 3 30 1 1 16 1 16 1 10 3 13 3 5 13 2 10 0 7 15 9 27 42 1 42 8 a l le 14 5 15 5 0 95 42 11 2 7 1 10 7 d 13 2 30 le V kR 21 2 14 3 8 10 93 oc 15 3 11 4 37 ec 14 7 14 9 91 i nn 4 149 10 11 09 42 3 7 89 4 4 S h 1 11 3 6 11 18 47 2 1 yD 21 9 3 30 RM-1 11 87 1 21 6 5 r 5 0 85 1 42 3 11 12 1 0 31 12 9 7 83 21 8 3 A 11 9 2 57 12 Sto 81 7 3 130 11 4 22 1 31 7 1 79 42 12 12 ne 31 2 9 R-8 132 77 22 0 5 42 3 yD 23 1 43 0 Ln 12 2 5 8 75 2 3 22 2 k 13 4 1 4 ic r 6 18 73 31 w RM-1 13 3 8 7 7 ll o 1 12 71 22 5 31 a 6 R-8 5 4 T 1 31 P eb 0 69 2 2 92 14 4 2 3 67 22 7 0 C t R-15 o od 1 4 319 15 b le Va lle 14 6 arw 65 22 6 B ri 8 31 14 4 8 63 ROS 3 1 0 15 7 6 64 22 8 15 2 15 61 239 59 22 9 321 1617 15 1 4 235 y Pl 4 233 15 5 6 16 5 60 57 30 1 8 16 17 1 55 2 24 1 5 5 0 17 5 17 9 E02 E04 30 53 2 R-10 4 1 6 183 23 1 51 E03 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book D03 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 22

C04 C03 R-8 10 C05 R-10 29 31 14 CPO Ct 17 Mer ion 33 20 14 2 9 14 Pi 1006 RG-2 300 ic k 16 27 R-10 10 4 95 5 ROS 20 14 n 10 estw 16 13 8 34 32 28 O 23 51 Pr ak Re d O N Ct 3 21 94 Rd 13 D 19 24 r R-10 ke 30 13 4 10 ak 7 9 la 20 83 16 12 15 Dr oy 86 5 12 10 20 R-10 29 H 33 71 13 0 1 11 11 22 IO 1 7 10 8 59 49 12 80 6 11 32 12 3 35 2 10 0 3 31 72 9 21 28 11 8 10 5 7 8 21 Ct 30 39 64 11 31 27 1 26 e ld 33 4 3 20 54 25 15 25 2 uirfi 11 t R-10 0 10 11 24 19 44 6 50 M 17 R-10 sC R-10 43 23 9 14 34 10 4 24 22 10 gle 21 5 2 12 60 20 2 22 3 Gle 33 5 23 7 n ea 23 23 1 18 15 Oakmont Dr 10 32 12 7 37 0 10 7 9 22 21 Ct 33 208 es 22 6 20 8 40 8 13 2 nn 36 21 tA R-10 6 15 31 36 16 20 5 2 ROS Sa in 15 16 87 18 6 91 15 7 R-8 32 24 2 19 3 14 R-10 Ca r nou sti e R d 28 20 13 24 38 ROS 17 9 9 97 17 8 14 2 9 13 13 13 48 r 170 13 12 rgeD R-10 17 4 52 R-10 12 90 Fo 22 1 12 7 7 13 12 9 Sain 19 14 1 d Ol 13 tA 116 54 15 3 13 1 nd 14 3 re w 5 Rd 13 sC 11 13 56 16 2 t 25 8 58 Be 110 ge 12 4 RG-3 llr 18 16 7 lle 13 0 iv e 2 13 2 142 44 24 13 Co 156 Ct 14 60 13 2 10 13 62 1 18 ROS 92 2 13 70 39 13 72 12 25 154 RC 133 13 2 6 78 R-10 R-8 115 63 13 R-8 120 IO 82 80 Ct 74 14 27 ol 08 lt u 108 49 sr Ba 105 33 64 14 14 12 25 54 S ci oto Ct 73 8 7 14 12 89 74 12 12 03 14 R-10 61 18 20 17 12 89 35 49 14 14 62 22 14 4 16 14 15 2 14 0 D03 D05 25 32 25 30 39 50 15 14 7 1169 15 00 15 02 Wi 42 33 12 ng 12 4 RM-2 36 e 15 dF 5 28 04 0 R-10 oo 40 48 41 13 1 tR 06 d R-7 6 28 25 15 100 28 115 Rd Wi 96 IO ng 87 Ca ed 1510 12 49 Fo 23 45 rno R-8 us ot 21 17 tie Ct 68 15 1357 R-8 118 0 103 10 67 19 ony L Ke 13 Har m n 63 to 26 91 11 21 n nR r Rd Rd 5 ROS 42 13 25 dom Dr 3 7 d e 23 F re e 12 9 13 41 Wa lk 101 34 3 5 9 u s tie 71 2 RG-3 36 R-8 39 13 53 13 35 10 12 55 IO R-8 51 8 no 70 4 16 22 47 1 20 13 6 18 R-8 10 Ca 68 5 6 r 13 57 4 0 54 43 69 6 W 44 91 13 R-8 40 1 9 15 6 68 8 5 11 17 19 Libert y D r 21 67 5 7 68 0 40 39 8 R-8 10 67 2 8 R-10 R-8 34 35 4 14 16 66 4 65 5 90 6 18 41 30 8 12 0 82 5 65 6 R-8 41 31 2 61 53 RM-1 26 57 27 59 55 22 64 8 64 5 65 63 99 64 0 Independence B lvd Dr 18 23 54 a ll d RG-3 7 56 kR 68 66 64 xH 62 60 58 RG-3 14 Fo 27 43 139 oc 19 ter Ln 21 lig h ec 14 3 RM-1 ROS am p ROS L RG-2 8 in n 41 15 S 92 h 15 1 R-15 0 98 11 2 E ss 43 16 3 RG-3 t age S 36 h V ill al 3 17 ex H E nglis 18 r 7 0 r 10 41 wD D 43 al 1 H a rro 5 18 29 RG-3 nt 9 l 40 9 ROS 18 RM-1 3 40 35 RG-3 2 17 RG-2 20 7 40 6 28 1 ine 0 401 27 6 18 430 nt ll 7 Iv y H a 34 2 40 2 29 4 19 Co 29 143 20 9 34 7 8 RM-1 18 RG-3 26 3 8 1 28 21 ir 37 5 RG-3 20 5 23 264 20 6 tC 3 20 26 1 19 21 19 t tone C in t 27 29 26 2 Fl 5 3 25 7 Fie lds 21 20 lC 1 a 1 51 d Te Ol 7 33 3 25 5 21 21 8 17 332 4 9 20 33 1 25 1 20 9 RM-1 C old 21 15 21 6 RG-2 4 329 r ro 21 4 Sto neb 11 yD 1 20 24 7 0 RG-3 22 3 22 32 8 21 n Ke nto RG-3 lo 21 Co 24 8 1 e 6 5 24 5 Bl ad 20 0 3 5 22 Sprin 7 151 Pl 24 6 RG-3 202 568 Gree n 7 26 149 143 24 3 2 05 ine 22 31 7 31 8 9 16 5 31 7 2 7 rol 22 RG-3 5 23 9 n Rd 6 26 31 5 31 6 e 26 31 6 20 a inkl 3 221 ok P l 1 31 5 NC RG-2 262 Pe riw 23 14 1 23 8 D 23 7 2 27 219 g Pl 31 4 20 RG-3 r 3 217 224 RM-1 E03 E05 23 23 226 26 3 39 Dr 236 215 20 4 E04 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book D04 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 23

IO IO C05 C04 89 9 9 02 89 9 898 89 6 89 5 C06 89 3 IO 90 0 89 7 89 7 IPM 1175 89 2 89 1 1 R-8 24 24 5 89 5 89 8 89 5 88 8 89 6 Sch 5 887 88 9 89 1 eL 884 88 5 ous M 1 23 0 4 88 8 88 1 87 7 oolh R-8 23 88 5 RG-3 37 22 8 23 2 88 2 39 88 2 87 3 2 4 22 6 88 1 88 0 22 22 21 3 9 87 4 87 1 z 86 5 st Creek 12 Alo n r 2 on D n re 87 7 Dr 49 22 0 23 1 87 2 86 3 Wils 53 86 6 85 9 Ann A es 22 7 12 dcr Fo 44 7 86 3 ve oD 9 22 5 21 8 Woo Dr 5 86 0 85 3 86 4 85 5 R-8 22 14 7 12 8 r 12 3 85 6 R-7 For 0 R-7 67 20 7 RG-3 54 3 6 12 88 85 9 85 4 ge 21 6 22 12 12 1 89 2 84 3 847 ROS 64 4 84 8 12 85 3 t Dr 205 9 84 4 78 RG-2 70 6 2 11 7 Old 21 2 12 7 83 72 14 20 1 11 85 1 0 82 13 12 5 84 5 r 1 5 9 14 0 11 rD 47 21 7 13 5 13 12 3 7 83 8 ylo 1 9 8 11 84 83 4 R-8 12 11 11 16 R-8 61 Ta 53 14 3 7 1 82 6 5 12 3 3 1 5 6 7 1 1 84 8 11 R-7 13 111 5 12 4 1 82 2 6 13 10 13 13 11 84 R-8 75 69 50 5 2 4 806 80 9 0 2 84 4 wG 7 11 10 9 81 4 124 12 11 Qu 7 9 ado 84 4 2 CPO 81 99 12 6 1 86 17 a 11 10 8 9 Me 66 118 10 7 8 2 83 il 87 93 81 7 83 74 23 118 10 5 10 4 84 4 0 7 82 9 87 1 12 113 105 8 40 82 1 82 112 10 10 8 8 38 L llow 10 1 t 29 8 RG-1 4 20 en S 51 Ho 111 10 4 85 ard wn 88 96 Bro 12 26 33 91 85 81 7 tT 8 83 urn R-8 RG-3 3 n 92 86 Dr 75 5 84 5 830 828 Pl 32 36 37 81 0 86 81 4 r 78 d 47 85 es R-7 dc 84 2 4 7 ee R 78 r er 11 67 81 6 3 Vi Villag e D oo 75 43 70 39 McK ttn 830 1 69 86 84 rg 13 11 35 W Bu 0 70 in 0 64 48 12 71 27 78 C-1A 63 58 57 44 74 1 2 9 15 21 31 67 31 8 11 76 40 85 C-2A Ave 64 ood Cir ia 59 52 45 30 Ironw 57 27 10 4 51 52 Ave 64 55 CPO 46 41 23 Ann 51 24 96 26 58 76 7 75 5 RG-3 44 35 45 40 19 IO 8 16 22 22 9 45 78 ROS 88 34 31 750 C-2A 15 R-8 R-7 45 SC-1 75 44 20 82 37 28 27 76 0 75 6 61 14 53 29 20 17 76 Ke 5 22 nt Cir 25 16 Cobbler Ln 10 01 15 5 877 6 12 03 ROS 62 4 54 27 10 91 5 90 9 M 18 13 5 82 0 14 84 0 ritage Dr 10 03 2 87 2 60 He 53 7 RG-3 88 2 CPO 30 24 65 12 1 74 8 91 0 83 0 ROS 42 50 87 4 115 1 2 CPO Rd 38 5 er 68 Walk 88 4 D04 D06 66 10 0 10 1 87 4 1169 10 2 36 3 10 CPO 116 1 4 70 1 10 1 RG-1 1 10 6 34 1 70 3 5 3 IO 7 33 10 8 31 35 70 5 ir rg C 9 Arlbe t Dr 70 7 10 3 116 0 tcoa 115 6 Wha 110 36 4 2 99 2 70 9 10 11 10 5 lvd 6 112 32 34 70 8 nc B 55 8 711 4 12 15 43 iot 25 114 41 t Bla 71 0 Patr Pl 27 10 17 71 3 Fre 14 Mon 71 2 edo C ir m erg 116 44 10 7 Homb 12 16 19 71 5 Dr 71 4 118 R-8 24 21 71 7 53 80 4 804 R-8 26 28 33 18 23 71 6 12 0 51 30 ROS 20 71 9 rn 35 10 9 erho b Sauls Matt 1 12 2 56 R-8 32 22 72 1 23 r 25 Dr 37 54 Libe D tion 25 3 lara 72 3 52 o 27 24 Dec d m ed ury R 39 IPM rty e l ntennia Blvd R-8 20 Fr r 26 72 5 Dr 13 3 D 42 4 2 13 1 Bice 29 ROS 44 28 72 7 R-8 46 631 3 10 9 30 72 8 729 48 10 130 13 4 31 132 R-8 50 52 2 33 73 0 73 1 10 32 73 ROS 11 2 13 9 13 5 5 21 0 20 9 22 5 RM-1 R-8 73 3 CPO 10 8 118 73 12 1 34 4 63 73 73 12 7 6 5 21 2 61 94 7 14 2 73 8 Mee 13 3 73 55 65 117 111 7 Cobb 10 5 Ct 22 1 leston 13 9 h Eig er t 73 e ting a Ex 74 0 Ln 9 Clar 58 60 16 0 14 5 75 5 R-8 74 1 12 0 56 RM-1 L 116 112 ouse 10 6 74 2 54 15 1 52 172 74 3 10 2 n y Dr IO 13 5 12 7 119 n 17 9 65 Colo 5 74 75 1 C-2A 3 14 749 ROS 10 2 74 4 118 75 3 RM-1 110 20 0 12 6 7 74 14 2 13 4 R-8 RG-2 C-3 74 6 74 Ct 50 1 8 54 9 52 9 51 5 ere Pew 3 n 8 o g e Was hingto 2 56 Ge Dr514 Paul Rev ter C t 0 r 3 56 5 13 1 C-2A 11 7 4 12 9 RM-1 528 5 4 15 0 E04 E06 2 55 104 IO 546 54 0 6 7 E05 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book D05 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 24

C06 C05 RM-1 800 C07 N State St 1 IO 233 225 861 1 CPO 86 0 21 5 CPO 84 1 855 30 1 21 3 82 1 Silver L ak e B R-20 84 7 211 ROS 20 R-10 9 83 7 82 9 P a tr 111 ic k R-8 13 3 Rd 82 1 82 0 30 1 W a lk er R-8 Ly nn lv d 81 3 73 6 e te ry ROS l C em Dr 12 6 M em o r ia R-8 72 8 side s t Dr R-8 809 80 5 80 2 80 0 80 1 20 6 72 9 La ke 5 d c re R-8 72 0 22 2 Wo o 22 6 IO R-8 72 8 72 7 73 6 R-8 72 4 R-8 N Br 31 0 71 5 72 0 80 2 1 314 40 4 71 2 4 RG-3 72 7 a d fo 70 R-8 1 42 2 0 73 0 71 7 71 6 70 7 66 8 73 2 32 72 6 72 0 70 6 12 5 C-1A R-8 64 3 rd S 50 8 73 3 72 8 72 3 221 215 63 9 R-8 20 5 R-8 72 5 52 6 725 225 C-1A 73 4 R-8 71 5 63 7 R-8 72 2 64 0 t Av e 70 7 60 6 73 1 72 6 126 63 0 La ke m b ia ROS C o lu 9 71 6 70 9 62 4 70 2 NG 63 3 71 R-8 73 4 72 5 708 63 4 d 62 6 0 71 3 70 3 222 216 B lv 62 7 R-8 72 woo 73 3 s St 72 8 o ve r 72 1 645 63 2 R-8 64 5 62 3 61 6 Ros 727 70 9 722 71 4 R-8 R-8 R-8 715 65 4 R-8 5 40 rs 42 1 d Pl 71 0 63 0 62 6 rn o 72 0 32 4 63 5 n or 60 6 R-8 62 8 61 4 R-8 71 9 71 6 50 7 61 7 70 7 63 1 s Av N Go ve 65 1 60 0 71 3 70 8 52 3 64 6 63 8 61 9 R-8 42 0 64 2 64 5 63 2 62 0 60 1 70 9 625 e 611 R-8 R-8 60 7 50 6 63 7 63 4 621 61 0 60 6 63 0 Av e 62 3 R-8 R-8 N St 52 2 640 61 5 F a ir v R-8 56 4 R-8 C a ro a n ia 57 0 63 3 63 9 62 2 60 6 54 7 n s y lv 639 R-8 73 0 60 8 605 628 a te S Pen IO 61 7 61 4 60 0 63 2 62 7 62 2 61 3 21 5 54 1 62 2 64 0 l St ie w 60 4 22 7 54 4 63 1 62 8 62 1 58 5 56 5 63 9 62 5 61 6 60 9 t 60 0 R-8 61 5 53 1 A ve 116 R-8 63 2 62 2 20 2 53 8 53 0 63 3 61 0 214 62 8 61 9 32 3 220 53 6 R-8 20 8 R-8 558 C-1 602 62 7 61 6 52 0 55 5 R-8 62 2 1 52 5 61 54 4 226 224 53 4 61 5 Av e R-8 61 2 42 3 53 8 52 3 52 3 55 0 32 4 m b ia 621 611 53 0 52 0 50 0 C o lu 61 6 511 52 1 511 54 1 61 5 54 6 53 5 52 6 R-8 53 1 15 R-8 61 2 52 5 53 2 50 4 60 9 54 5 54 0 52 1 52 8 509 50 1 53 0 D05 D07 52 9 R-8 60 5 51 2 53 9 515 52 1 R-8 62 3 53 6 52 4 50 0 45 0 R-8 52 6 53 8 53 3 53 0 52 0 42 9 R-8 511 12 5 R-8 60 6 53 9 52 7 511 50 5 53 4 50 9 20 1 St is on 62 6 427 NW 22 5 M ad R-8 M R-8 53 8 53 5 520 30 1 42 6 44 8 R-8 53 9 52 8 505 321 44 7 42 5 51 8 R-8 1 52 309 e st S 53 4 311 52 7 52 2 42 4 42 3 44 4 60 2 315 50 7 50 8 319 44 3 53 3 52 8 52 1 42 1 43 1 51 6 50 5 50 1 44 2 43 7 R-8 t 53 1 50 4 41 9 52 0 51 5 51 0 42 0 RG-1 411 41 6 R-8 R-8 RG-1 42 5 21 0 R-8 52 1 516 2 511 41 6 42 1 40 6 RG-1 51 5 409 t 511 am S 52 6 0 41 2 40 0 W il li 51 42 2 ROS 50 9 52 7 19 15 52 2 611 RG-1 510 514 406 407 62 1 41 2 411 41 5 40 5 St 40 0 36 0 50 6 C la ra 3 44 8 50 1 IO 40 7 40 1 12 10 50 2 446 2 40 0 16 49 44 5 61 2 44 352 34 9 35 0 40 1 350 34 7 804 71 0 43 8 350 35 3 C-3 41 4 34 0 33 8 N Qu 348 346 34 5 43 3 35 7 71 0 Pea 34 4 34 9 34 1 RG-1 RG-1 M RG-1 35 1 32 8 32 8 71 0 71 0 0 71 r St ee n 34 5 32 6 RG-1 RG-1 St 7 61 3 33 4 3 2 32 31 8 34 1 3 71 0 18 32 3 a St 34 4 330 3 71 0 C la r IO 33 7 32 6 31 7 34 0 37 0 32 2 30 8 30 5 30 0 32 9 31 5 C-3 32 0 30 6 30 1 IO 32 5 311 30 4 RG-1 IO 31 4 30 2 317 30 4 30 3 23 7 30 8 RG-1 231 311 23 4 22 9 ra E x t RG-1 6 300 RG-1 34 C la 305 23 7 22 9 235 22 7 30 8 RG-1 23 8 RG-1 23 0 22 5 23 6 22 4 M 23 9 23 3 RG-3 RG-1 235 22 7 22 3 y St IO 23 8 22 2 M ar RG-1 RG-1 511 32 0 22 3 231 226 22 0 11 IO 24 0 22 5 22 4 21 9 21 4 23 6 23 1 22 1 22 0 21 7 21 3 IPM 31 0 22 4 22 9 21 9 216 4 NK 22 0 21 3 21 3 RG-1 21 208 N Ne 50 6 234 22 5 21 8 111 23 5 212 IO 200 ir k w 22 8 202 20 9 1 3 63 22 23 4 21 2 24 5 22 5 22 6 21 9 wS RG-1 NW 23 0 ood 21 7 22 0 21 0 RG-1 t 22 6 211 20 8 225 M 23 9 21 8 61 2 es t St 21 3 204 C-1 20 6 20 7 12 8 IO 327 St 12 4 12 0 323 325 20 9 115 IO IO 23 1 2 7 12 0 6 RG-1 11 2 208 206 20 1 118 R id 22 5 118 112 St ge 20 7 200 15 2 147 C e c il IO 65 RG-1 116 14 13 1 1 108 ly S n St IO 12 7 12 1 112 10 2 F u lt o 2 20 0 12 6 124 10 6 RG-1 12 1 t RG-1 117 RG-1 100 RG-1 22 12 0 112 E05 E07 109 107 4 112 1 110 RG-1 E06 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book D06 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 25

C07 C06 C08 C-4 R-8 Mc 911R-8 915 D o w e ll D r Ct 0 81 4 R-8 515 54 3 4 7 6 2 92 Bu 52 82 90 92 Dr 2 1 am 82 21 d 53 R-8 91 R-8 4 0 0 8 lv 12 17 C el ck 91 h 51 76 h at 428 B 12 F re a 42 1 rv C-2A so 7 RG-3 1 d 3 51 Ca 52 5 81 29 n 22 50 6 n 9 11 se 52 8 50 r 5 Dr rD n 51 w 51 25 D ld 1 0 2 11 1 72 RG-2 51 9 r f ie 112 2 42 L n 52 49 0 44 51 82 0 11 2 8 r 0 9 To 8 R-7 8 R-7 a 2 50 507 en 50 4 41 R-8 G 112 N rd 4 1 50 6 34 Ea 48 46 99 Ga 1 st 10 52 C-4 9 2 Av 48 8 5 2 3 5 7 50 49 4 e 4 9 46 98 39 8 9 50 51 47 43 5 10 394 3 R-7 R-8 8 1 5 51 51 4 Su 51 3 8 42 5 38 R-7 1 ns 49 48 4 8 45 0 47 r 0 1 et 39 D 52 10 Dr 6 ke 9 38 a 48 0 48 38 rL 7 R-7 ve SC-2 10 2 3 49 2 il 38 C-4 37 6 S 2 36 Dr 48 1 39 i ew R-7 RG-2 10 e v 6 7 42 8 7 k 27 La 0 5 10 36 4 4 29 9 RG-2 42 40 0 1001 Ce 0 nt 42 er at 34 8 Do C-4 ve r 1 1 27 26 8 31 3 26 Ln 25 k 7 Oa 0 28 R-8 60 0 1 52 Pe n 55 5 5 ns C-4 1 25 C-4 54 50 2 yl 27 R-8 7 va 1 53 51 57 4 ni 56 6 a 9 54 4 5 50 N Am A ve 1 53 5 53 4 52 9 25 0 Ex 51 9 43 25 5 enue R-8 R-8 52 6 RG-5 5 52 9 518 n Av 5 24 t on S e ri c a 5 0 6 is 517 511 24 Mad R d R-7 ROS 51 0 81 ND k 0 43 Oa 2 53 0 511 50 5 Gr D06 D08 4 R-8 R-8 50 4 u po it e 43 0 ee 80 50 5 h 111 125 3 P e n ns t 10 7 24 nh 8 W 72 10 1 2 nt H 47 6 72 il l 22 R-8 500 43 y lv a 2 0 Av wy 71 16 54 R-70 e 12 4 Rd 35 nia A 23 8 70 ey 25 114 26 1 o dn 12 0 10 0 17 R 54 43 ve E 81 77 10 1 10 3 La 20 6 18 0 15 6 R-8 19 1 xt 0 20 30 41 77 22 ke 45 14 R-8 65 77 0 46 61 69 vi 17 9 14 2 24 57 20 ew 0 53 43 2 44 17 2 10 49 10 4 18 Dr 17 8 ROS 409 31 17 1 R-10 25 100 16 8 40 7 12 St 86 R-20 94 17 1 to n 21 N Ed g eh ill 35 82 in g RM-2 17 66 72 92 a sh 78 16 2 W C-4 40 5 14 9 52 60 15 5 Le 44 14 0 12 1 2 14 1 w 41 C-4 38 12 9 d 705 el R 18 34 6 Haz 28 10 5 M 40 13 6 34 1 10 3 170 is Av e 33 1 49 14 2 i ll RG -1 39 D r 32 1 14 4 ROS 119 1 R-7 32 3 21 14 0 62 63 12 8 5 RG -1 116 R-8 110 R-10 42 50 33 3 31 6 12 2 IO 113 9 ve 31 5 61 y la 7 nd A 118 R-7 M ar 30 7 10 5 30 0 RG -1 24 21 R-8 40 30 8 8 305 30 30 2 62 R-8 30 1 211 21 6 St 210 29 8 M a ry 24 1 1 51 65 24 0 20 5 29 0 y RG-2 t it h S kw 23 1 20 0 211 65 23 6 IO 22 8 22 9 Sm 28 4 le P 61 R-8 23 0 20 1 ap Ed 22 7 19 4 27 4 M 63 g em 49 22 4 RGO 2 23 22 2 61 222 15 5 18 6 RG-1 C-4 21 2 on 21 9 14 9 tA 20 6 18 0 P en K in g 21 8 N S ta 21 5 14 1 ve 21 6 21 3 20 2 16 8 n sy 25 6 31 s Hw 21 2 13 9 20 8 te S 20 1 16 0 lv a n ROS 11 8 20 0 14 1 13 SC-1 RG O y 12 9 t il S t 15 0 ia A v C-4 C ec 13 4 115 IO RG-1 ve 14 0 RG-1 127 13 9 12 8 A w a re Ken 12 9 e 11 D e la 15 RG-1 23 0 t Av IO 45 50 100 M ap RG -1 3 10 9 N Am 11 5 40 e 12 0 110 10 8 105 113 15 101 112 34 RG-1 RG-1 le L 10 7 21 31 21 15 1 RG-1 e r ic 20 10 5 n 15 38 46 20 t t io n S 32 15 on S an A E D iv i s RGO 39 F u lt RG-1 R-8 11 ROS 20 R-10 RGO P ar k D r R-10 44 31 B ayard Ave ve 10 15 49 6 IO1 30 29 9 11 N B ra 9 10 3 10 9 21 1 50 55 4 5 9 19 29 R G -1 R-1 0 34 10 d fo rd 21 17 6 12 R-10 54 3 53 2 R -1 0 41 2 1 R-10 26 28 E06 E08 112 29 5 1 43 21 53 St 2 22 25 7 E07 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book D07 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 26

C08 C07 R-8 r 315 RM-2 C-2A C09 RM-2d C t dD R-8 330 W 8 52 el 3 33 4 5 4 8 W 13 90 33 i nd 32 9 37 31 31 r fi 34 1 1 32 7 35 6 309 2 17 Dr 31 54 a 34 6 1 35 13 72 G 26 31 36 35 12 ar 5 0 5 31 34 R-15 33 2 7 3 4 Ba 36 bo 0 4 31 34 20 32 M 30 92 ar 34 3 3 13 78 2 7 31 2 y 30 8 2 St 1 18 09ac 35 33 31 0 7 33 6 3 2 3 3 3 Ar 4 1 Tree 34 12 05 34 33 20 2 RM-2 1 8 Br 7 3 3 th 8 5 2 34 32 31 1 33 Rd R-8 ad 1 30 6 2 5 ur 0 32 0 3 2 3 7 112 33 3 32 le y 1 Dr 3 31 R-8 6 5 2 RM-1 1 2 0 25 Rd 4 L n 125 3 25 0 25 8 4 3 0 8 2 24 3 3 1 2 0 R-20 8 y 2 9 32 e d 246 7 33 31 21 9 n 20 5 30 34 N im 1 n 21 12 K e 4 3 1 2 32 1 8 Ei 3 2 8 R-8 31 24 7 3 se 12 17 25 1 22 2 i tz S te 0 37 9 nh 24 R-8 10 2 22 Rd ve n 6 2 4 3 24 3 3 ow 1 2 8 6 7 30 20 8 52 7 21 07 23 R-8 3 er 1 2 2 3 0 so 9 36 12 6 4 21 12 4 Dr 24 29 21 n 24 7 2 77 5 23 8 12 Dr R-20 35 2 23 3 69 1 7 24 1 22 12 23 1 34 23 12 61 00 23 ov R-8 8 6 0 22 9 3 23 2 4 12 RG-2 35 1 2 2 er 34 5 D 0 0 2 21 55 35 23 Pa 3 12 5 6 21 20 41 8 rk 3 33 4 40 9 R-10 12 68 22 1 Dr 4 6 34 5 21 12 32 8 62 219 on 6 20 12 33 9 31 ri s 31 12 54 5 12 19 r 21 8 9 Rd 0 Fr 8 C-1 20 Ha 33 20 25 48 ea 12 17 12 B ra k 4 30 5 r Oa 32 7 40 rD 22 12 12 34 21 0 xto te Ro 36 5 R-8 12 R-10 9 hi 6 6 11 31 05 12 2 ck 20 8 RG-2 12 18 W 120 nC C-1 31 0 12 6 12 fo A co 30 23 12 rd ir 4 20 0 4 12 34 9 15 5 g 04 Xi R-8 22 8 12 rn L RG-2 6 n 21 10 9 c uan 6 19 RG-1 10 5 0 10 1 ve 12 S p r 05 n 12 1 ck A 11 60 02 88 16 5 1 nco N Ha 11 C-1 1 01 R-7 7 11 17 C-PO 01 95 6 10 4 3 10 17 16 16 61 108 10 1 4 eR 10 0 16 R-8 7 25 00 5 2 d W 11 19 16 SC-2 7 ill 14 5 is R-7 14 3 14 10 2 10 18 19 9 8 RG-3 Rd 10 0 16 18 5 14 4 6 1 1 1 140 RG-3 ROS R-20 1 18 115 1 1 13 0 18 9 17 5 13 2 12 127 17 1 R-7 3 7 2 4 140 17 16 17 R-8 6 17 0 92 13 RG-2 C-4 0 R-7 8 3 5 91 16 7 16 7 12 RG-3 4 16 9 7 15 8 N ix o 0 15 14 15 261 17 6 3 3 11 1 N 15 16 5 12 9 10 R-20 9 4 15 11 R-7 n Ln 14 14 4 2 2 16 8 Ha 0 11 90 4 91 3 14 3 2 8 15 14 15 11 6 10 74 R-7 82 ls e 0 R-7 16 3 4 0 7 13 8 1 11 8 R-20 822 15 13 5 15 9 10 10 3 16 3 yR 13 12 14 6 68 64 10 0 RG-3 6 4 10 4 7 14 13 6 d 1 12 8 7 87 15 13 9 14 R-8 4 11 10 16 1 12 6 12 81 5 RG-1 15 D07 D09 2 5 7 9 6 11 12 3 90 58 54 2 15 15 4 5 2 0 14 9 5 5 15 2 1 9 1 91 6 13 15 13 4 10 88 2 48 46 11 7 8 69 3 6 5 1 89 2 8 38 1 6 3 8 14 80 14 7 14 14 0 13 10 76 57 87 75 36 3 1 29 0 70 51 G irl 4 4 2 9 10 85 R-7 1 13 R-7 1 86 82 64 58 47 13 7 0 12 83 71 26 13 96 39 Sco 7 R-8 13 3 6 11 81 63 24 1 2 1 3 0 7 7 44 6 0 1 9 2 9 12 5 1 ut L 13 12 52 59 48 44 14 1 7 84 13 2 12 7 6 10 71 12 R-7 11 80 62 0 51 R-8 n 8 11 01 9 6 40 30 R-7 1 2 1 82 4 4 12 3 83 72 54 47 82 36 R-7 2 0 7 46 9 Mi 07 73 07 28 R-7 1 116 6 3 12 12 13 RG-1 R-7 3 68 81 79 59 3 35 80 5 3 5 t sc 13 31 7 7 31 27 5 13 3 R-7 9 2 R-7 6 0 8 4 4 he wy 83 5 705 45 03 ision St 20 R-7 52 rR Pk E D iv 72 7 4 25 12 82 34 11 e 1 RM-2 41 l 72 4 50 81 d p Ma 4 8 80 61 6 4 42 2 25 12 88 66 0 R-7 57 R-8 8 12 12 74 72 61 6 35 09 9 98 R-7 53 22 11 111 3 25 111 R-7 2 2 45 1103 70 72 Gr 8 12 5 R-7 ee 52 Up 32 0 57 35 28 19 27 112 4 36 8 nh 10 N 62 56 53 l an 24 10 111 6 12 4 6 0 i ll 45 38 29 19 0 63 111 6 Ed 71 dA 10 04 36 1 R -7 Av 36 09 11 R-7 63 73 R-7 15 R-8 23 5 1 10 4 ge 57 50 ve 91 8 36 12 3 7 2 e 37 17 26 36 9 36 36 0 h il 48 100 5 72 16 R-8 0 36 62 lA 53 31 8 10 87 3 2 20 100 36 45 R-7 7 ve 47 41 36 1 72 60 25 18 90 02 6 35 8 1 8 5 90 7 10 5 0 36 44 72 an C t 54 86 86 18 6 30 35 ke rm 9 4 50 L oo c 7 35 44 3 18 17 82 4 72 R-8 1 0 2 80 8 35 0 44 35 82 92 92 72 R-7 n 85 1 7 0 R-7 1 35 44 49 38 27 81 0 8 84 6 35 2 72 1 18 90 90 10 RG-2 RG-2 0 5 6 7 8 C-1 5 83 5 35 35 43 61 71 9 80 0 Rd 83 8 43 2 71 L 84 80 3 35 6 n 4 1 82 3 5 71 e 9 RG-1 83 8 71 1 7 61 7 R-7 34 79 6 34 a rd 7 73 79 ey 81 1 8 71 R-7 1 3 24 71 1 72 8 1 35 42 9 Ha 60 2 81 78 5 7 42 3 G 5 81 ls 6 42 4 61 4 5 in g 70 77 82 34 71 71 S 60 0 34 79 6 r 1 7 9 8 60 Sp 76 1 4 0 802 80 34 42 5 1 71 2 64 74 61 RG-2 6 9 6 33 9 60 75 78 71 3 No b H 8 0 77 6 R-8 73 7 81 3 6 C-4 1 79 42 0 41 60 75 60 9 6 34 71 0 4 Mar ta 72 77 1 0 2 7 74 5 6 79 81 33 9 711 7 76 7 6 40 4 73 78 0 5 41 ill 60 60 7 34 3 8 70 8 R-8 2 3 80 33 5 2 W ay 801 6 78 R 40 7 75 3 2 60 4 3 41 Dr 6 d 72 R-8 70 71 73 6 79 8 33 8 60 5 70 6 St 7 0 6 40 2 77 R-8 33 Ah am St 11 17 73 1 79 1 0 721 8 76 33 60il an 622 72 4 4 60 w 57 33 ta 70 4 1 40 3 lo 71 4 1 0 rm R-8 0 5 78 9 al 62 72 74 75 70 5 33 32 e S 0 3 70 k 0 RG-2 2 Sw 72 B 40 oc Ed 2 2 16 23 8 77 33 lu 32 SC-2 Lo 71 2 0 ec 7 4 7 22 ge 71 0 8 0 E 76 32 oa 50 70 h il 41 1 RM-1 50 R-8 6 tS 45 1 75 6 2 6 lA 72 1 73 32 t 0 28 71 1 74 8 4 3 35 32 32 S ve R-8 Du 40 2 6 43 49 8 32 32 1 po 42 5 73 0 70 8 32 nt 44 72 R-8 5 0 31 9 55 72 54 R-10 Hw 10 3 7 6 33 7 33 0 9 y 70 8 C-4 E07 E09 61 31 331 E08 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book D08 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 27

C09 C08 C10 R-15 A 71 aw Von d 91 ay Dr 111 St 30 9 at e RM-1 H Ct w 30 y 1 es 30 8 Strip 1 30 0 RM-1 25 7 25 9 26 2 65 26 7 27 0 26 9 27 4 41 7 27 7 42 1 27 9 B r ax Suvarna 219 40 5 t on 15 05 Ln 14 26 R-8 28 7 15 04 42 0 40 4 28 9 Cir 15 05 15 01 211 15 00 19 3 19 4 13 ve 20 9 40 0 15 c kA 13 7 15 09 1501 19 2 co 29 7 an 13 3 NH 20 1 12 5 35 19 0 8 8 18 5 15 12 12 1 14 4 6 14 1 R-8 2 117 14 0 14 3 3 14 3 86 4 15 08 13 6 14 3 1 13 2 7 18 12 8 14 3 0 21 14 3 3 4 14 2 14 3 1 15 14 2 1 12 0 12 4 9 14 3 8 18 2 1509 1513 151 7 14 1 14 2 7 2 116 141 14 1 5 14 3 R-8 e 14 3 Av 5 112 141 9 0 14 2 oc k 16 8 3 108 6 14 3 nc 14 2 20 1512 1 a 14 1 15 08 7 15 SH 14 2 15 04 3 15 16 14 3 31 7 14 09 5 14 0 16 4 4 140 14 0 14 1 6 1 4 8 14 2 14 2 5 4 14 2 14 1 R-8 3 4 2 14 3 16 0 14 2 14 12 0 141 9 6 14 01 3 16 3 14 2 14 2 23 14 1 15 6 7 4 14 4 21 14 2 1 14 2 0 R-8 14 1 14 2 ve 4 1 14 0 15 9 23 9 1405 1409 sA 15 2 kin 18 8 14 1 2 23 7 14 2 5 Ho p 0 14 2 17 14 1 9 23 5 15 5 8 6 14 1 2 17 23 3 14 8 r 6 14 1 3 Ci 0 0 7 14 1 7 e 14 2 14 1 23 1 R-8 50 m Tho 46 6 Cly r 14 0 14 0 8 48 17 4 44 10 8 5 4 42 14 1 14 1 14 1 23 0 rnto 172 22 26 22 3 36 40 17 0 17 5 18 49 22 1 nS 34 38 47 16 8 22 2 14 32 16 6 22 0 t 225 16 7 R-8 43 45 16 4 21 3 A cac 22 221 41 22 4 30 16 2 16 5 211 Le x 7 39 21 21 2 D08 D10 0 28 219 16 0 21 0 M ah ia P 223 R-8 i ng t 216 21 3 26 2 15 8 15 7 39 211 15 5 20 9 24 22 15 6 20 3 s Dr 2 15 5 l 21 8 og a 20 7 on P ho la 20 5 22 20 3 15 4 226 20 2 c 20 20 1 15 2 N i ny P 22 k Dr 20 4 20 2 14 7 31 b 15 0 8 l S hady ro o 40 30 20 0 8 21 14 ROS 21 4 nC 14 6 28 21 0 48 27 in de 20 6 50 10 3 12 20 2 14 4 13 9 58 26 l L 24 10 2 10 7 10 14 2 23 R-8 22 1 14 0 10 6 11 105 109 117 18 19 13 8 R-8 110 11 5 6 101 113 12 t 13 6 41 13 1 16 119 4 14 Teak Ct 114 13 15 12 12 5 12 2 2 12 R-8 8 3 12 4 1 3 2 12 0 ROS 11 118 11 2 12 0 10 100 104 13 2 8 12 7 116 12 1 125 108 0 114 112 12 1 7 116 112 N Little Creek Rd 12 110 113 6 10 8 111 12 4 10 6 3 10 4 10 2 10 3 10 0 RG-1 15 54 1572 RG-2 1566 70 15 06 CPO 1462 16 00 711 RM-1 80 3 St Ah a m 3 C al 5 dw 6 7 e ll R-8 9 8 Ct 10 11 Prospect Pl MHP 1061 APZ II RM-1 12 14 E08 E09 E10 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book D09 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 28

C10 C09 C11 A Lo ng Point Rd Lon A gP oin D09 t Rd D11 Fox Rd Rd N Little Creek 70 APZ II 65 E09 E10 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book D10 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 29

C11 C10 70 D10 APZ II L on gP oin A t Rd Rd Creek N Little 75 65 APZ I E10 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book D11 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 30

D02 D03 A 1617 R-10 38 17 RM-2 E03 61 21 85 22 R-10 F03 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book E02 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 31

D03 D02 D04 R-10 R-8 R-8 2 179 RM-1 183 51 ROS 16 16 16 4 49 ROS 6 47 232 RM-1 5 16 17 2 30 5 17 0 8 17 4 45 4 17 6 180 182 1 178 43 30 184 6 41 30 18 6 R-8 21 9 RG-2 3 48 49 9 30 2 21 5 111 10 47 23 0 46 38 39 109 10 12 3 119 115 11 112 Ch e 3 45 0 22 6 1 37 11 Tuck C i r lse a 44 Wa y 22 2 36 35 43 R-10 21 4 et 23 3 21 8 21 0 10 110 107 42 41 Matthew Ct 7 33 32 40 10 8 22 5 31 108 105 38 120 RG-2 R-10 2 22 1 12 4 116 29 30 10 21 7 21 3 104 28 10 3 R-8 10 6 10 3 106 A St oney Dr 27 10 4 20 9 20 1 26 25 22 8 20 5 104 28 Fa lm 12 9 102 23 18 20 22 101 101 ou th d Way fie l 24 Wa y 21 121 117 10 2 er R-10 18 21 6 21 2 10 19 20 8 R-10 17 6 17 19 20 4 11 20 H ea 21 17 12 0 103 23 Cranberry Run Dr th 25 20 0 15 27 130 1617 15 16 15 101 126 122 118 R-8 114 14 13 10 16 9 5 3 1 11 9 14 10 9 7 1557 1549 Yar m ou th Way 7 8 1559 R-20 12 6 5 6 5 R-10 6 3 10 1555 4 2 4 4 3 1551 1547 1 R-20 1617 8 2 1585 2 1 Forrest Ave 1570 R-10 E02 E04 15 14 10 11 R-10 7 2161 6 3 5 40 RM-1 2 9 40 39 2 3 38 8 0 41 20 7 40 7 38 1 rth 41 5 No 4 1 20 20 40 RM-2 42 5 3 38 4 37 7 40 8 do 42 w 44 20 1 3 2 9 9 20 2 41 42 0 n 38 37 RM-1 9 6 Dr 3 36 41 43 44 5 6 6 5 7 41 37 3643 44 1 42 0 1 2 4 41 2 3 8 3 6 37 4 2 RM-1 40 0 36 9 36 45 2 RM-1 8 7 404 40 RM-1 35 35 5 35 402 50 3 9 4 42 39 43 2 44 4 8 36 RM-1 1 1 43 6 44 0 50 1 44 8 4 5 0 5 40 4 38 38 0 3 7 36 3 125 34 3 40 0 3 38 37 9 4 34 3 9 50 5 36 6 41 RM-1 35 t 50 7 st C ib 3 35 Pa 3 Tr 0 3 1 2 rne 36 7 9 3 33 2 7 ra 35 33 50 500 Fa i RM-1 4 0 36 9 bi 4 de Wes to 3 38 38 tt 34 4 0 3 8 36 35 S 3 e 34 8 9 t 3 2 3 19 5 D 7 504 35 5 4 3 r 33 31 34 33 9 RM-1 ROS 36 0 3 31 50 8 4 10 8 2285 35 1 32 2 0 ve r D r 36 311 RM-1 40 1 RM-1 35 7 3 7 6 34 34 3 4 4 2 3 30 32 26 9 3 40 3 3 19 3 4 30 3 RM-1 26 7 10 0 25 3 3 33 3 5 30 6 30 41 5 3 31 3 9 3 7 2 4 30 2 55 31 2 3 2 0 1 32 3 25 7 31 48 Dr RM-1 3 274 RM-1 0 8 Lo 32 9 5 27 8 24 3 270 41 32 4 s 26 6 a 30 28 2 os 31 31 ft l 24 3 9 26 2 2 8 4 RM-1 5 0 44 Cr 7 2 32 2 4 2 35 3 1 nd 25 2 3 41 8 31 0 7 g 26 0 40 23 ri n 32 6 3 3 Dr 1 2 ar 27 RM-1 31 30 18 9 RM-1 3 1 2 18 5 h C 2 9 8 181 1 8 25 6 24 24 5 30 177 21 7 25 23 0 4 20 30 3 17 9 RM-1 6 1 6 17 16 19 8 7 24 2 17 2 1 24 E S 8 he 16 1 17 6 7 4 1 Ja m 8 ld 16 22 rake 1 es C 15 4 7 ey C ir ff r t C 1 0 Je t 16 W 1 6 13 1 5 eldr 4 Sh y 2 12 7 a 15 W 12 3 a e 8 St 8 ak ri n 14 4 12 6 119 16 0 t 11 n 14 RM-1 2 Ka Ci RM-1 l le 115 24 ui RM-1 r 11 2 Q 0 14 3 6 28 10 F04 1 111 32 10 4 8 F03 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book E03 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 32

D04 D03 RG-2 RG-3 RG-3 RG-3 D05 RG-3 RM-1 RG-3 262 Sto n 164 150 20 6 Gr e RG-3 228 20 13 1 Pl 21 48 0 R-8 230 5 eb 301 212 8 25 26 1 30 2 222 0 235 Dr n 12 9 rook Pl Cold S pri 3 ng 30 1 220 25 B la d e 224 4 e 226 218 11 2 Pl ROS 234 1 32 216 25 10 0 24 0 214 in e 9 25 8 474 Dr r ol 24 inkle 7 24 ROS a riw 11 NC RG-3 Pe 24 2 25 6 7 155 125 10 1 K enton Rd 24 4 2 121 RG-2 24 10 45 Gree nway 6 24 8 43 101 RG-2 Independence Blvd 41 ay Ln 87 G reenw 39 37 RG-3 SC-2 35 Sq 26 10 4 46 30 33 Par Haven Dr 31 125 160 12 1 Greentree Dr ROS 133 111 15 3 16 3 25 173 H am 120 16 pton D r 10 9 16 7 C-2A 83 10 7 RG-2 124 12 6 10 5 13 8 14 2 15 6 s hC 174 16 0 M ar 25 ROS i rw re 50 24 ek Dr Fa 1399 RG-3 s Ln La ke id ts e 1549 ur ay 15 11 Forrest Ave RG-3 14 R-20 Co SC-1 June Ln 1539 1 Dr 1547 C-1A 1543 CPO 1 1310 1298 R-8 1424 1344 1330 1358 1324 14 62 1294 C-2A C-2A C-2A 1350 1510 1278 3 C-3 14 86 1404 5 1340 4 7 1294 15 R-8 CPO 1310 24 1302 17 15 13 9 15 15 09 11 34 15 07 15 05 3 19 15 0 11 1300 44 Mi 1362 15 RG-2 01 15 ffl 15 08 1326 in 15 04 15 R-8 50 02 15 15 Rd 15 14 1517 15 00 1280 1518 1519 1427 70 29 RG-2 1425 1423 R-10 1421 14 1419 1417 1415 1413 1279 1411 1409 1520 1521 1407 25 1405 1403 R-8 1430 1401 1522 1523 1432 S Fa rmview Dr 27 1525 1434 1400 1401 1422 1416 Fawn St 1420 26 1436 1278 29 1284 1402 1403 80 15 1527 1438 1418 1404 275 273 1405 RM-1 271 1440 31 1425 1423 1421 ROS 269 1407 14 06 267 14 27 E03 E05 26 1529 1442 1409 5 45 mill Dr 14 ood 27 26 10 3 RM-1 7 W 14 12 14 26 14 14 1300 1 14 16 14 18 27 9 1434 14 20 1444 9 8 25 25 1438 14 22 Tr 29 14 24 14 26 7 1432 25 46 14 28 af 1436 14 30 Dr RG-2 5 3 14 al 21 25 5 44 4 1 R-8 ga 3 er 21 4 9 0 RM-1 3 14 ov 43 r 24 25 1 4 28 28 2 D st 1 7 r 21 43 9 9 e 2 1 17 21 5 24 10 W 209 5 0 43 27 7 24 RM-1 21 0 RM-1 43 3 2 27 8 6 20 r 24 3 15 13 00 1 431 24 6 41 rD 25 1 20 4 9 42 9 26 6 9 RM-1 s 20 40 te 0 23 e R-8 1 ch 7 42 4 40 17 20 RM-1 Wor 8 24 7 40 5 6 6 4 23 3 42 2 4 24 21 ROS R-8 401 4 2 5 23 RM-1 403 42 0 3 42 1 8 3 22 4 6 23 1 41 0 8 23 RM-1 41 18 RM-1 23 4 23 1 6 24 22 8 19 7 40 6 5 23 RM-1 1 40 8 30 410 412 C harring 22 9 8 20 Cr 22 0 os 23 23 1 13 00 25 s 5 5 3 22 7 7 31 7 21 8 23 31 E To l Dr 3 2 22 225 22 Br lho 111 Pl 1 oa 9 208 223 RM-1 eP R-8 3333 3 W 21 7 5 B on y ds us 26 Wa 21 gt a 22 1 fli n ro ir n 347 ta 5 ni Mi f 21 1 3 l ds n 0 sP 2 11 Pe 22 8 196 RM-1 ta l 2 21 9 24 i rs 9 30 1 20 07 RM-1 R-8 IPM 1 2 2 47 Pl 14 2 5 3 7 20 20 1 41 20 31 5 ROS 15 We 35 13 Dr 0 1 M iff 32 7 13 5 3 st 31 13 1 es 13 1 32 7 RM-1 r r ov m 12 9 rD 36 Dr T 13 136 lin R e 27 ha 1 12 12 7 fa l 3 13 6 ga 13 6 23 RM-1 32 19 7 4 5 15 11 5 11 12 5 13 2 d 13 6 13 28 3 Tr 12 0 W North St E North St a ROS 11 ille Rd 12 8 Hazle ttv 24 10 12 0 9 1 12 11 7 RM-1 8 1 1 1 6 11 23 20 11 5 RM-1 16 9 11 12 2 4 22 113 2 109 12 RM-1 111 RM-1 12 4 0 8 10 5 8 ROS 7 6 10 3 107 11 16 IPM 21 1 10 1 4 11 2 No c tric 10 11 10 ROS 5 E le 0 21 RM-1 108 rth 4 11 RM-1 Wyomin g Mill Rd do 3 2 2 106 18 w 21 10 10 4 ROS RM-1 2 n A ve 21 6 Dr 1 20 9 3 1340 21 4 20 21 205 207 2 21 21 2 RM-1 0 20 Gagen Ct 4 RM-1 5055 102 20 R-8 10 1 2 F03 F05 104 103 6 F04 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book E04 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 33

D05 RM-1 D04 54 0 1 4 ROS 7 7 RG-2 150 117 D06 R 52 8 5 6 Paul Pe w C-2A 42 5 6 93 9 12 07 12 03 8 42 3 9 552 8 54 6 eve r t er 12 11 eC 110 7 10 4 12 23 12 15 110 3 t 10 11 12 19 R-8 110 5 10 11 Ct Ct G eo 110 1 row h t Ct oo d 12 12 04 1227 12 08 D wig 77 W CPO 91 12 12 rg e 12 14 IO 14 11 08 RG-2 0 11 06 65 12 2 12 16 41 8 11 04 h 11 02 Wa s 41 6 1228 RG-2 24 90 8 7 12 6 41 4 n Dr RGO 41 2 57 5 RG-3 41 3 117 5 57 in g to Rutherford Ct Carver Rd 4 3 41 0 13 3 1193 58 Ct iso n 1233 1241 1237 1225 1213 1205 40 8 M ad 12 9 51 C-1A 1229 10 1 IO 1174 43 44 Andrew Dr 1188 1179 11 91 1171 11 82 1183 40 1194 107 112 1 1218 40 4 1232 1228 1224 40 33 34 t 1240 RG-2 C-1A nC 1214 1206 30 e rs o 40 2 J e ff 10 1 27 Ct Afton Ct 20 C-2A 71 CPO 117 2 11 1164 on 1202 C-2A 21 118 4 1157 CPO RM-2 Saulsb 945 117 8 1165 321 A ft 25 991 901 117 9 951 s Ct 955 m 983 Ad a 1001 987 975 10 35 ury Forest St 17 ury Rd S Saulsb CPO CPO C-2A Forrest Ave 948 934 970 1224 960 C-2A 1 1020 1230 4 1156 1148 1140 RG-1 Be n nington St RG-2 RG-1 5 1116 949 941 1188 1126 1124 931 922 1076 1040 1000 3 12 988 21 RG-1 RG-1 15 20 950 5 30 883 CPO 1145 10 10 1153 1100 942 941 RG-1 CPO 25 Rd 1129 1137 33 Bertrand Dr 7 1200 28 t Woodsto ck C RG-1 36 949 40 37 9 Lin coln St CPO 1154 43 1128 RG-1 44 15 11 1146 106 1275 1269 1263 1257 1251 1227 888 1245 1239 1233 954 106 114 RG-2 1221 1209 1179 1215 11 109 73 67 N Farmview Dr RG-1 SC-2 11 ROS 1268 61 1262 115 1256 947 RG-2 11 1274 1250 1243 1244 1214 1110 1231 1232 1225 943 1208 1202 1170 Jaw d Dr C-2A 1226 125 1155 1237 1219 RG-1 1273 1255 1249 138 133 1267 1261 1213 1207 938 1171 1238 1220 1201 115 6 948 RG-1 1030 S Farmview Dr 11 Davis Cir 141 RG-1 62 1272 1260 1254 1248 1242 1236 1224 1206 ROS 1212 1200 117 4 11 1180 1266 C ir 1230 1218 68 E04 H a yes Sim o n E06 375 Cir 21 0 IPM C-3 22 0 155 219 29 3 165 23 0 ay W 0 1 24 Com me 285 rc 0 e 25 lv d rB 26 0 is e CPO 195 Be IPM 100 TND Enterpri s e IPM 196 27 0 Pl S au h St 1351 E N ort lsb u 0 12 6 ry R d IPM 0 13 1 13 00 12 50 1340 12 80 F04 F05 F06 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book E05 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 34

D06 D05 RG-1 RG-1 D07 M 631 120 RG -1 220 38 112 117 39 34 118 RG-1 NG 35 IO RG-1 102 36 115 10 3 316 RG-1 111 318 112 RG-1 NQ NN 34 ove 112 37 IPM 110 2 41 0 35 30 27 RG-1 0 51 9 1 ew ue e rn o M 10 0 10 5 23 22 n St RG -1 26 24 F u lt o 440 31 19 RG-1 92 St nS RG-1 rs A 38 R G -1 NK 12 2 28 15 119 62 3 NW R G -1 24 t Rid 601 520 29 11 ve ir k w 34 205 RG-1 25 16 209 65 C-1 A 64 1 74 22 19 217 211 g e ly 28 e st 91 225 122 C -2 11 118 10 1 26 RG-1 RG-1 16 71 o od 14 307 303 Wes 309 C-1 A M St R G -1 210 4 319 7 C -1 A 212 St 13 8 325 317 70 St C-1 A 222 224 214 IO to n 37 16 C-2 230 61 405 C-1 A 9 41 7 12 15 C-1A C-1A SG 310 2 53 42 9 427 42 5 41 5 312 7 11 C-1A 8 Dr 316 65 60 2 M 320 18 62 1 501 13 o ve 40 326 15 C-1A 8 509 n St 2 19 26 RG-1 51 7 7 iv is io C-3 16 28 W D rn o r 37 13 23 29 19 60 3 424 30 32 C-2A RG-1 40 44 29 34 33 C-2A 1 43 0 71 7 42 0 62 7 31 s Av S K ir 11 41 52 0 RG-1 62 9 16 17 24 8 30 34 37 39 41 e 2 46 48 38 kwo 20 23 72 1 SW 35 46 45 50 80 1 73 1 60 0 28 41 62 2 od S 72 3 42 53 es t 39 31 45 50 215 56 811 30 St 55 217 ed 59 S Ne C-3 E Re St 32 t 39 46 47 54 40 49 10 2 RG-1 63 0 C-1A 51 305 726 45 54 10 1 21 8 10 6 Fo r 805 39 47 60 57 w St 10 5 1 10 8 C-2 es 49 11 St 730 815 48 64 67 10 6 CPO t 61 108 11 5 411 880 C-3 900 65 0 54 63 10 1 916 856 83 4 105 110 84 4 RG-1 862 IO 60 109 902 848 10 0 112 C-1 RG-1 108 83 0 64 826 RG-1 111 118 17 870 73 0 47 12 0 838 72 6 72 2 10 2 117 908 RG-1 81 0 112 C-2A 71 8 883 71 2 611 11 4 123 G ib bs D r 814 C-3 700 25 71 6 11 9 120 833 829 821 83 8 801 80 6 55 45 14 1 118 12 3 12 8 12 7133 847 841 For 0 14 5 853 122 13 es t 21 7 C-2 12 7 Linc oln S t 144 St 13 6 146 680 883 58 5 13 3 R-8 50 44 14 1 23 5 C-2 13 5 C h erry St 106 107 R-8 842 822 816 604 32 1 309 40 3 329 C-2 105 C-3 119 868 862 12 106 114 St 848 C-2 830 113 rm a n 2 C-3 407 RG -1 836 126 44 o ck e 856 114 125 415 409 W Lo 51 6 60 0 RG-3 209 222 R a il R-8 115 839 813 119 222 R-8 226 845 C-2 827 821 222 32 6 IO 867 861 853 833 122 127 128 30 0 41 2 129 715 roa 21 2 31 2 D a vi s C ir 21 7 Vin e S t 120 123 134 IO P aul St d Av 133 C-2 RG-1 126 218 71 720 RGO 238 S la u RG-1 137 1 806 RG-1 818 235 RG-1 838 226 866 860 139 142 41 6 812 e 145 C -2 134 149 23 0 Irm a S t IO 824 RG-1 830 144 RG-1 70 1 g h te 874 25 142 15 0 70 3 37 1 145 70 7 50 0 15 0 14 9 77 3 71 9 715 717 r St RG-1 731 72 5 65 5 15 7 74 9 IO 75 3 RG -1 15 6 C la re 82 5 82 1 76 3 70 2 16 2 80 3 77 7 726 RG-1 16 3 81 5 72 0 71 0 73 0 71 4 15 E05 r St E07 45 0 nce S 74 2 64 5 h te 16 4 30 0 la u g 17 1 67 3 S im C-3 S 76 0 75 8 M in 76 8 70 7 67 7 h St 77 2 t 17 6 E N o rt on 81 6 80 6 4 52 0 72 9 71 9 711 37 5 73 5 35 0 RG-1 83 4 82 4 im a 73 1 C ir 74 9 73 3 75 5 84 0 80 3 St 75 9 426 RG-4 80 7 76 3 45 1 85 1 40 0 83 3 81 5 n R ee s nk L 84 7 82 3 St Ba o rt h 411 EN e St IO 48 0 40 0 B an n 40 0 in g S 48 7 319 t 40 1 C-1A 41 5 r St W a te IO 61 9 W 42 2 30 0 IO S Qu e en St St e st S W 70 4 TND 55 0 95 1 75 1 71 0 CPO 55 0 64 2 90 1 C-1A 71 0 Rd 71 6 yss 95 1 Wem 80 0 80 5 C-3 90 1 106 08 10 0 1 72 0 725 n rry L 41 0 116 be 20 0 re e n 42 2 206 10 1 SG 208 107 81 4 50 0 21 6 109 73 7 117 50 6 504 50 8 72 4 411 e St 51 0 20 1 93 6 42 3 r 207 Moo 52 0 10 0 2 10 3 50 1 L ly o 209 75 5 A nn 93 4 21 7 CPO 10 93 2 511 35 5 106 10 0 10 5 73 77 3 10 4 R u th 40 0 108 10 7 0 93 0 52 3 51 3 d S 41 0 10 6 CPO 41 2 116 109 42 2 20 0 108 t 10 1 W ay 50 0 206 111 80 40 1 107 110 0 21 6 208 113 51 0 411 70 6 109 41 3 117 115 81 C-1A 51 2 79 3 52 0 70 7 20 1 0 42 3 ROS 80 8 70 4 207 11 50 1 119 7 80 6 21 7 209 12 2 511 70 6 70 5 70 2 80 4 12 1 40 0 51 3 12 4 80 2 52 1 40 8 70 4 70 3 70 0 12 6 12 3 F05 F07 80 0 41 0 70 2 70 1 60 8 128 12 5 850 F06 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book E06 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 35

D07 D06 RGO 21 St IO R-10 10 12 R-10 D08 IO ision 22 15 NB N S ta 11 1 Pe nn 21 26 53 B ay 25 E D iv 16 2 9 RGO 7 10 35 52 1 52 R-10 112 IO RGO 29 ra d f IO 28 a rd 6 te S t 41 R-8 18 1 Av e 9 30 7 o rd n St 51 3 2 Ave 4 ROS R-10 R-10 40 1 53 ivis io 43 41 51 RGO 6 5 20 8 W D RGO d 42 52 R-10 St R 2 3 ill 6 R-10 15 1 51 51 52 2 nh 6 RGO NA 11 e 1 19 108 12 42 5 G re m er 3 14 0 RGO 2 51 9 11 6 4 52 RG-2 15 18 5 S Br 10 R-10 59 5 9 10 51 51 ica n 25 20 0 4 27 29 3 10 ad fo RG-1 139 Park D r 14 26 34 33 Av 42 4 5 40 2 6 50 rd S 24 e 41 45 5 45 C-2A 34 39 RG-1 t 42 R-10 R-10 115 8 St 45 9 44 5 50 46 RGO 29 4 an 53 er m IO 33 6 53 43 1 50 1 ck 46 22 R-10 oo 41 43 55 5 89 6 54 45 EL 55 57 RG-1 2 5 45 22 C-2A 61 107 12 1 6 d St R-10 46 21 W R ee 117 0 C-2 44 55 Libe 9 R-10 59 C-2A 10 2 C-2 10 3 55 43 2 2 12 1 rt y 22 3 2 10 9 110 2 12 9 S Sta 118 4 6 113 23 RGO 12 ROS 10 3 40 0 11 8 117 15 2 24 116 27 41 10 3 te St 4 12 0 12 5 13 9 15 24 10 3 12 4 12 9 13 6 Hwy 0 re e t 13 1 25 14 0 IO 3 12 0 12 7 13 6 41 RG-1 13 3 14 6 3 K ings Aly L eg LZ 13 3 14 8 137 P 12 1 Th e C-2 St 13 7 IO Minor15 6 13 9 15 0 1 islat C-2 145 340 C-2 C-2 419 12 3 n St ive A 14 4 33 20 IO 10 1 a Court St cke rm 205 RGO 109 W Loo 31 215 14 7 1 t 117 rk S L ib e 154 6 2 30 ve Yo e of 205 er 21 9 40 1 Fe d Du k IO IO 114 8 21 4 r ty ROS 116 32 22 5 15 411 RG-1 C-2 10 2 22 Ave 11 al S 22 0 22 9 IO 20 0 40 6 420 20 7 120 10 7 103 22 6 ROS t C-2 21 0 12 8 t 303 rth S RG-1 E No 30 0 307 135 400 217 22 9 10 7 21 43 0 100 15 St 317 10 6 C-2 e nn 30 9 R-20 v er R d 5 21 9 12 4 mP 23 0 RG-1 128 RG-1 132 10 42 a 41 0 2 Willi 8 S ou 301 16 26 IO 30 5 10 4 43 0 RGO ROS 43 5 t h ea RG-1 Ri IO The G ROS 31 6 37 5 C-2A IO ve 31 7 43 0 st A 15 0 k Ln RG-1 321 122 12 2 7 B an rn 44 33 3 45 41 0 ROS RG-1 43 0 56 K e nt Ave 38 E06 E08 30 48 54 31 6 RG-1 417 12 3 RGO 40 47 40 1 34 41 0 1 40 1 41 7 EW C-2A RGO 41 7 40 6 36 at er St RG-1 t te r S 50 2 41 0 13 4 13 6 E Wa 400 41 8 41 4 42 0 424 50 4 411 42 6 10 8 40 1 Sho 42 2 43 8 41 9 15 0 12 4 50 9 42 4 44 4 RG-1 429 447 IO 42 6 42 9 10 1 tg un 40 5 42 8 51 6 435 116 42 6 51 9 43 4 Sussex RGO 50 5 C-2A Ave 9 R-8 43 42 9 Aly RG-1 428 441 RG-4 RGO 41 6 Le gis 50 2 60 1 C-2A 447 507 60 0 ow 44 6 12 4 R-8 61 in R 50 50 9 60 4 60 9 44 8 RG-1 57 9 53 Kerb lativ 52 1 C-2A 44 6 C-2A 114 19 61 0 61 3 R-8 17 47 120 15 21 St 52 7 61 9 429 Elm Ter 61 4 at e r 43 3 43 9 e 443 10 2 e Av 204 50 5 110 WW 20 8 62 0 62 5 419 Dr 22 6 50 2 12 411 llin s 6 20 62 4 53 5 22 10 6 63 1 Co R-8 30 0 53 7 10 6 63 0 42 0 43 0 43 4 RG-1 54 0 46 44 2 414 IO IO 26 32 54 3 18 50 63 4 7 70 53 0 54 5 70 0 71 5 814 IO 54 0 53 7 70 4 1 82 0 0 72 73 1 71 4 74 5 Ne w 750 73 5 S Ne 54 7 71 72 Ca s 74 9 0 60 5 tle A 72 w St 4 RGO RG-1 60 0 73 0 56 7 ve 73 4 Ter 56 0 S Gov ull IO 80 0 Sc S State St 740 C-1A C-3 38 ROS t ernors th S 55 0 So u 614 60 0 o ol 10 0 Ave S ch 622 t a ry Ele me n r o ss 61 8 62 0 H oly C IO 62 4 63 8 C-3 6 60 1 64 0 C-4 30 725 64 0 C-3 72 4 CPO R-8 C-4 640 63 1 737 75 74 0 665 650 59 63 Hope St 51 55 773 755 33 53 74 8 41 R-8 712 80 3 39 S Bradford St 804 807 ve 80 5 k in A RGO 724 ROS 68 6 IO 706 701 ara c R-8 793 72 76 80 7 S a ck 716 64 68 IO RGO 812 60 28 40 54 R-8 90 1 36 50 R-8 827 814 20 46 738 16 728 955 F06 F08 725 822 903 F07 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book E07 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 36

D08 D07 SC-2 R-8 D09 C-4 t 61 6 31 32 4 331 tS 2 6 7 31 7 55 55 70 4 5 R-10 a 31 3 31 RG-2 co 10 6 318 325 e 2 St 6 31 3 lu C-4 54 C-4 7 31 12 319 an B 0 312 R-8 31 31 1 534 e rm 8 ck 1 30 9 30 6 31 3 21 30 30 o Lo 9 6 53 53 5 30 7 E 30 R-10 55 30 7 J oh 5 4 30 0 n 5 30 30 3 2 30 30 1 22 3 Hu 10 1 23 30 nn 0 125 7 24 1 119 131 201 55 4 Br 207 213 219 24 225 51 6 8 51 4 ow 23 1 CPO C-4 2 No b Hill Rd 51 2 10 10 0 24 25 n 5 R-10 22 6 5 1 110 2 23 24 Rd 120 132 C-4 0 112 122 200 210 218 24 24 23 0 212 10 1 220 228 9 un 111 7 22 1 123 24 135 B ne l 207 201 ug r r 113 215 l Ln 125 227 23 7 D Ba b b D 5 yB 22 209 23 5 217 L ad 9 229 8 22 24 10 210 0 10 4 106 24 6 5 108 23 4 110 26 0 24 112 R-10 200 9 114 204 2 23 116 208 24 118 RM-1 212 240 120 122 216220 224 SC-2 228 232 IO 236 71 24 3 67 63 59 55 IO 72 62 51 IO 8 391 14 190 52 47 43 M er Wa y B JH Brow n Blvd 290 42 0 ay 777 RG-1 34 39 S Du p ont Hwy 455 32 C-4 R 889 d 35 22 31 Un C-4 Co unt r y D 295 761 2 12 27 C-2A ite ay 19 23 dW 9 11 r 21 7 15 3 Cou rt St 42 2 42 6 430 434 RG-1 52 0 S Litt le Cre ek Rd 438 442 RG-1 0 28 C-4 5 6 50 75 C-4 7 32 4 32 0 9 81 C-4 5 51 RG-1 430 33 C-4 8 42 3 51 n St rti tl e A ve M a 35 0 RG-1 430 42 2 C-4 43 0 L e vy 45 0 9 34 8 C as 52 RG-1430 43 5 d Co Co rR 852 N ew 0 E07 E09 53 lle 7 ur Ke nt A wg IO Mi 35 ve tL RG-1 443 r Rd ill 5 46 0 0 55 n RG-1 37 St R iv e 37 8 40 3 E W ater St RG-3 0 RG-1 7 41 49 0 2 40 7 11 4 55 44 4 40 40 4 RG-1 RG-1 51 5 vd 44 7 Bl 8 41 RG-1 en ue 52 9 IO H 44 8 Bl C-4 55 1 Ba 443 58 0 yR d 80 5 0 60 5 65 1 5 62 SC-3 0 56 59 1 59 1 RG-1 0 64 806 81 4 5 65 655 C-4 81 0 C-2A 80 0 SC-2 C-4 5 63 a ll 61 4 nM 61 5 611 e 62 0 C-4 C-1A Pu bl Blu eH IO 62 5 ic 6 64 0 69 3 Sa yB fe t 15 0 5 65 64 5 19 lv d 65 1 91 14 R-10 5 65 23 r Ci n tio 33 ta 20 26 or La sp 41 an u re Tr 32 89 l Dr F07 F09 40 49 93 F08 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book E08 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 37

D09 D08 nP l D10 n to C orne Ke r Ct ir RM-1 an C RM-1 Se w MHP C ir P il 6 ot 25 65 25 4 59 RG-3 Pl 57 61 ow 10 25 2 ad Sh 5 19 Cir 43 er 41 25 35 58 5 0 18 8 3 56 Coop R-8 1 248 44 46 4 32 18 31 r 30 28 29 16 9 eD 4 7 dt 26 27 305 17 16 re un 0 RG-3 25 17 Ro 24 307 22 R egent S t 3 15 1 20 R-8 2 15 306 308 310 31 889 18 302 304 IO 9 RG-3 16 144 13 14 201 203 137 425 441 70 205 207 209 211 130 M o ria ri Ingra m St 12 443 123 450 R-8 10 R-8 8 9 206 208 210 121 118 Dr ty St 7 457 a r ch 112 462 461 111 Signal St 105 St 102 466 APZ II 103 Barr ister Pl 104 106 108 lm es on M arg are t C t RG-3 M Ho ROS 480 479 104 483 R-8 484 103 R-8 106 102 105 101 107 109 S Little Cre ek Rd R-8 498 499 C-1 C-1A 502 503 994 IO 968 972 980 982 110 0 R-8 C-3 Bl 4 505 B ue 50 521 529 93 en l 0 1236 1240 1246 H 537 C-3 54 852 0 3 51 vd 1 518 55 7 505 55 E08 113 2 E10 8 54 CPO 5 t 510 C 56 Ba rl 8 51 5 55 51 8 57 3 6 C-3 7 5 Cr 52 56 1 60 RM-2 4 58 52 aw 5 53 57 4 7 2 fo 58 Hwy 1 R-8 53 rd 54 3 58 2 9 3 54 53 8 Av 0 59 59 52 1 9 59 Ct 6 e 5 54 S tate 65 l er 5 8 55 3 59 7 w 4 60 Fo 55 56 4 0 5 2 6 61 56 9 119 6 56 0 61 62 3 8 8 56 5 61 655 57 1 63 1180 6 6 57 58 1 62 Ot 7 63 is D 4 58 58 7 4 0 63 5 59 2 64 r 3 64 59 8 9 0 5 59 59 65 65 6 3 60 IPM 118 0 5 8 66 60 65 1277 4 9 61 5 6 66 61 66 5 2 62 Ro 67 65 SC-3 1 4 8 62 67 be 62 9 2 3 6 62 68 rt a 68 63 e on Ru n Conne c to r Ave 5 4 63 69 0 68 9 75 64 8 5 69 M 65 69 1 R-8 9 69 3 69 69 5 697 P u n ch B lu 0 15 eH en Ma 0 ll 60 M 5 0 65 70 IPM APZ I 5 65 C-4 1 20 F08 F10 101 F09 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book E09 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 38

D10 D09 D11 APZ II C-3 Horsepond Rd 1256 1276 12 77 15 00 24 15 E09 25 65 C-3 12 77 Maggies Wa y 5 10 MC D Dr IO IPM 5 C-3 72 0 73 13 1 75 M 8 84 8 3 85 88 119 M C-3 2 12 rt y Ln APZ I f fe 6 La Bulld 23 R-8 13 110 og D r 53 C-3 0 15 M 50 67 119 59 C-3 10 110 0 95 8 70 F09 F10 F11 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book E10 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 39

E03 E02 505 5 E04 RM -1 2 40 36 10 44 13 RM -1 8 103 19 7 12 48 107 he 4 W 1 12 11 l dr ak e Cir S 0 12 15 16 Ca 11 16 7 L e s te 1 4 nn 3 12 on 11 2 8 M 3 8 r Ct ill 7 4 Dr 12 RM-1 11 15 16 20 Rd e ill e ttv zl Ha 11 R-8 19 15 22 26 30 34 F04 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book F03 - Ju l 2 1, 20 10 Com prehensive Rezoning 2010: RO S August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 40

E04 E03 E05 RM-1 RM-1 104 103 2 5 R-8 10 6 1 ROS 10 10 5 14 10 ROS 55 50 d 1340 R e il l 9 18 De 10 tv 3 IPM t 3 y 11 7 le 11 rb az 3 23 sh RM-1 H 15 9 22 i re 11 7 5 Ct 22 1 22 1 6 12 23 2 5 10 23 7 12 3 96 8 33 22 50 22 4 12 9 Ln 3 33 Wyom ing 7 le 0 9 22 da 32 12 11 n tr Elec 6 5 21 33 6 xo 32 2 33 Sa 7 15 ttin 1 8 32 ve 2 B ri 11 21 32 M ill R ic A 7 5 8 31 4 44 Ln 4 20 32 1 gh a ok 20 31 3 32 0 44 d o 9 7 br 30 43 ROS 23 4 ill 44 mD 6 31 3 Ln 27 43 G 14 9 5 30 2 0 e 31 al 44 r 9 22 30 8 42 41 16 04 uv 27 6 05 43 300 15 3 31 e 2 B 35 26 30 4 42 5 43 53 7 30 1 30 0 42 34 30 8 53 3 15 7 39 34 7 41 3 42 0 54 6 4 38 43 42 41 9 53 16 1 47 42 0 52 38 5 42 52 53 2 7 16 5 42 41 6 63 46 51 52 1 8 41 2 52 63 3 16 9 50 8 7 55 40 51 52 4 62 9 6 17 3 54 4 51 3 52 0 63 40 5 17 7 0 9 62 40 50 51 6 63 2 58 1 8 3 50 5 51 2 7 62 62 73 14 62 61 78 62 4 9 18 1 66 50 1 50 8 61 3 72 4 62 0 18 5 50 R-20 5 2 50 0 60 9 6 72 73 70 61 72 1 18 9 74 5 2 60 1 61 7 72 8 60 71 72 4 9 8 3 82 78 60 71 82 72 0 5 83 6 4 82 60 0 70 9 71 6 83 2 60 70 5 86 2 82 1 71 8 2 70 1 81 7 82 13 7 8 3 4 90 70 81 82 0 94 4 82 70 9 80 4 13 3 0 6 F03 F05 70 5 81 98 80 2 81 2 2 80 1 13 2 10 6 8 10 80 4 80 0 0 11 80 9 11 4 08 11 13 8 12 3 ROS 11 2 12 R-10 15 19 23 27 31 35 11 7 3 erside Rd Riv 14 18 22 26 30 34 2 6 10 Cre 127 135 ek en 110 d Rd B Ca na l 114 2 13 0 20 St 118 6 12 6 20 2 12 0 21 48 10 21 4 R-20 1016 99 0 342 966 346 ROS G05 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book F04 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 41

E05 E04 E06 12 80 1250 1340 0 IPM 12 8 ve tr ic A E le c TND ROS ROS F04 F06 10 ROS 39 43 47 51 55 59 R iverside R d 34 46 50 303 14 6 306 307 2 14 3 310 311 20 C rickle C reek L n 7 20 314 315 211 318 319 5 R-20 21 219 323 Ca 214 n al St 327 21 8 ROS 226 331 191 R-20 330 335 1016 R-10 338 334 339 R-10 342 Rd 34 3 n 346 351 347 r to ROS Bu RG-2 w Ne R-8 ROS Ke ss el 40 13 r in 1 g 5 Dr Av RG-2 an m 410 e 135 R-8 Ha 40 6 RG-2 G06 402 G05 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book F05 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 42

E06 E05 E07 C-1A 800 418 61 5 60 6 13 1 12 9 27 810 ROS 50 0 40 9 62 2 40 1 70 0 13 2 0 Dove r St 50 8 61 3 800 62 0 60 4 R-8 13 4 R-8 411 13 1 51 8 51 0 61 1 611 1 806 61 8 13 53 3 804 41 9 60 2 13 70 4 50 1 61 0 6 803 60 9 61 6 60 9 60 0 50 9 62 3 13 85 61 4 0 70 2 511 62 1 60 7 1 3 7 11 812 811 51 9 62 2 60 8 60 7 61 2 0 14 6 14 9 820 812 62 3 62 0 8 61 9 61 05 14 1 0 0 6 1 7 6 8 6 1 4 3 817 820 7 62 1 61 60 60 5 60 8 14 62 2 60 3 Ct 89 61 9 61 6 61 5 60 6 15 0 14 5 0 17 825 824 62 9 62 0 21 od 61 7 61 4 61 3 60 4 60 4 60 1 15 4 7 62 7 618 5 6 11 60 3 0 2 1 14 9 29 831 61 61 2 6 15 51 6 832 61 8 62 5 61 6 60 9 7 00 6 35 o 3 1 4 6 1 3 610 6 0 2 0 1 6 1 er 20 62 6 60 6 58 w 839 838 61 6 611 60 8 R-8 62 1 61 2 15 Sh 26 846 60 6 60 5 3 43 34 61 9 61 0 60 9 60 0 49 843 846 60 3 15 30 0 61 4 1 7 8 6 07 604 1 7 1 5 6 6 0 2 60 5 0 16 57 59 42 852 30 2 5 6 6 0 5 60 6 1 851 61 60 50 5 59 850 R-8 61 2 60 3 60 0 65 61 3 60 4 50 4 50 3 16 16 16 1 1250 1 860 857 R-8 60 2 60 1 50 7 8 3 86 858 611 50 1 17 0 R-8 2 16 71 56 0 9 0 50 865 864 61 60 60 17 1 5 60 7 50 0 50 1 50 5 2 16 6 7 70 865 864 874 17 9 5 66 60 8 50 1 50 3 4 17 70 0 2 50 3 875 5 17 1 873 874 873 60 6 50 0 50 5 50 1 6 1 17 7 3 872 50 3 50 4 50 7 1 5 Wap les Ave 50 6 50 9 17 7 7 14 50 2 R-8 50 18 903 904 906 60 4 50 5 7 50 8 511 1 18 9 6 903 905 50 4 50 50 1 907 51 0 51 3 50 3 911 904 60 2 50 6 912 R-8 40 0 22 911 911 50 9 51 5 5 50 8 51 2 40 2 28 912 511 50 917 918 60 0 51 4 51 7 7 17 917 957 953 943 937 931 925 917 51 0 51 3 918 915 Sun set Ter 36 916 R-8 R-8 50 ve 923 926 51 2 51 5 51 6 9 5 923 926 42 kA 51 4 51 9 51 31 932 921 924 51 7 1 R-8 ha 929 929 5 5 2 51 8 46 932 932 930 51 6 927 Jane ka Ln 54 935 938 sc 935 51 9 on 938 935 938 R-8 55 0 51 8 51 943 944 943 935 R-8 K 944 943 51 5 944 936 54 8 51 7 941 R-8 W oodford Dr 950 944 52 9 51 0 949 949 950 R-8 950 54 6 5 1 51 2 949 949 54 3 52 2 3 51 4 955 956 955 954 5 52 956 955 956 54 4 52 52 7 52 051 6 54 1 9 2 647 961 962 961 959 958 52 R-8 R-8 53 962 961 53 1 4 962 54 2 53 9 3 52 965 966 R-8 965 53 7 6 970 R-8 5 53 623 515 519 We stvie w Ter 54 0 52 613 507 417 411 8 8 547 421 403 321 527 53 W yom ing Ave 523 Shan k Rd R -8 0 53 53 4 53 R-10 53 2 112 0 6 1114 706 1124 R-10 638 R-8 606 532 524 614 548 516 11 624 540 506 420 30 11 0 330 11 1104 56 1 10 17 6 03 R-10 3 111 10 14 11 6 11 55 3 324 R-10 7 0 111 se dg e oo d 44 Rd 09 543 10 25 TND 519 11 0 W 11 11 35 4 11 535 527 52 11 112 5 68 50 7 0 1033 R-10 11 45 11 55 2 58 11 13 1115 11 11 29 1103 R-10 r 20 54 4 1128 11 11 17 R-8 Char l e 116 53 8 530 4 55 28 514 506 1123 sD 117 2 1136 522 1109 116 5 F05 W oo F07 11 11 113 6 db u r 25 ROS 25 23 n C ir 11 113 1131 10 1119 78 5 81 117 7 1144 1136 1146 27 C-1 R-10 1139 8 1156 24 1147 1144 26 135 1205 1149 1139 1131 118 5 1152 1147 1155 541 R-10 10 85 1152 533 523 1134 R-10 735 1155 1160 1155 567 559 515 R-10 551 119 9 1164 575 76 Hol ly Dr 0 1163 1144 312 Wes tw ood Dr 1162 R-10 117 0 11 Dr 312 M a lla r d 11 1163 R-10 744 1201 576 584 CPO 75 0 720 568 560 736 1170 534 712 706 117 1 552 542 R-10 514 IPM 524 506 O ak Dr 1178 Yearsley Dr 78 1207 5 76 117 9 5 12 9 175 165 155 1052 195 145 1215 741 1186 1210 749 733 721 715 705 118 7 C rescent Dr 1225 601 18 18 3 5 1 12 St ew 79 3 13 0 77 17 R-20 R-10 134 132 ar 146 6 3 77 18 170 156 0 tC 136 3 758 704 616 20 0 19 2 730 720 626 17 11 t 1 6 11 2 76 4 738 712 Ly 127 67 748 15 117 608 av nn 5 139 107 77 en 16 h 99 87 R-10 Dr 21 0 17 ROS 108 Rd 20 12 8 n 2 15 4 60 r to 12 12 112 0 110 72 Bu 112 114 14 8 88 Sh 118 138 w ow 116 106 Ne 12 ad 10 8 116 6 98 115 395 Ct 6 39 9 393 38 7 10 128 13 12 120 Grn 05 119 8 rs 5 R-10 41 dle 13 37 4 116 RM-1 0 10 10 42 9 11 id 124 3 56 Blu e Beac h Dr 123 Baker Tu rn 11 42 2 3 37 R-10 9 F 40 38 4 128 5 36 499 45 5 44 22 8 4 R-10 1 37 49 5 46 3 1 132 49 1 48 7 47 9 22 362 35 9 6 6 22 R-10 43 1 136 35 ea 2 45 8 45 0 44 219 ts 135 4 2 D 22 35 46 6 7 3 494 Dr Wi 21 34 140 488 482 476 3 40 5 4 34 rr y 143 40 21 5 33 5 rb e 144 41 3 6 n te 40 0 7 42 1 40 41 5 411 33 147 41 9 41 7 5 40 9 42 3 3 8 32 C-2A 148 40 2 21 32 11 Av e 7 Do gw oo d 3 31 98 0 22 8 Dr 211 0 152 2 Do 32 21 30 9 41 4 41 0 gw 5 41 2 9 41 8 41 6 40 8 20 ROS 15 6 2 422 R-8 31 1 155 42 0 oo 21 6 30 R-10 7 7 20 dC 4 317 313 30 4 32 1 9 21 4 R-10 6 3 32 5 t 33 3 29 33 7 32 9 R-8 2 20 34 5 21 5 35 1 34 1 8 20 5 A lder R 30 9 3 1 28 d 37 5 20 R-8 7 0 27 37 9 31 8 31 4 31 0 30 5 10 11 21 33 0 32 6 30 20 8 26 9 33 4 32 2 34 2 6 40 1 34 6 33 8 35 0 6 35 4 29 7 29 3 287 281 27 5 20 6 204 27 36 2 35 8 26 1 36 6 32 1 31 7 30 2 26 7 30 5 30 9 25 9 8 33 3 32 9 32 5 26 9 G07 33 7 G05 36 34 5 34 1 25 3 24 5 3 357 35 3 34 9 31 3 25 G06 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book F06 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 43

C-3 E07 E06 E08 ROS R-8826 R-8 841 R-8 S New St C-1A 732 738 837 915 IO 737 838 92 1 95 5 R-8 812 R-8 803 Dover St 845 742 24 1 25 3 804 C-2A R-8 901 809 805 904 748 811 906 907 764 817 RGO 811 914 911 R-8 23 3 24 5 24 9 818 918 917 221 22 7 825 819 766 23 7 RGO RGO 824 825 207 R-8 928 925 309 826 R-8 831 20 1 839 C-1A R-8 832 25 2 833 246 14 3 825 131 14 1 932 127 13 7 23 8 837 29 774 838 13 5 Gooden Ave 938 RGO 843 23 4 305 R-8 R-8 846 t 22 1 S 22 6 240 RGO 117 R-8 Pin e R-8 23 0 R-10 39 113 847 834 15 2 21 5 23 9 10 7 851 850 33 47 10 3 148 21 8 St 1002 977 833 s L otu 857 855 1006 804 43 21 4 858 22 7 C-1A 132 866 20 8 20 1 R-8 RGO C-1A 1012 818 25 12 8 144 112 R-8 865 863 5 12 4 R-8 866 10 03 wy Monroe Ter 870 116 308 863 1018 40 911 10 6 po n t 873 1024 42 14 5 14 9 R-8 874 H 873 1001 23 6 871 109 113 14 1 R-8 1001 826 224 R-8 1032 26 13 1 13 5 Waples Ave 218 R-8 834 1009 24 30 36 12 5 23 2 104 105 R-8 S Du C-1A 905 35 R-8 900 804 67 1017 156 91 3 907 63 20 4 21 2 98 RGO 1034 146 R-8 Pa r k 910 1027 911 808 1023 15 4 1036 13 6 92 15 0 33 917 914 814 901 1035 15 21 25 116 22 0 10 30 Ave 917 R-8 1042 10 4 820 1041 850 1031 11 10 2 10 6 140 21 5 91 5 86 R-8 925 C-2A C-4 68 74 Lotus S t 922 923 40 21 4 50 20 7 C-1A 1045 80 864 RGO R-8 931 930 1051 30 201 931 868 26 121 20 8 112 7 868 911 115 12 3 12 7 R-8 1054 R-8 937 936 112 6 937 878 93 19 1 20 2 939 1058 95 Av 1113 e 12 19 6 r 880 1059 878 is D 943 944 1062 10 25 rr 943 62 R-8 Mo 880 10 3 118 126 a rd 952 920 1072 19 0 1068 18 2 56 953 87 116 R-8 1063 110 CPO 1076 953 940 1137 98 10 2 3 ch 18 4 Dr 888 1067 81 88 10 R-8 957 956 50 re e n 35 RGO 959 1 Or IO 960 1075 16 7 1 17 8 44 47 960 967 1078 77 80 7 965 1079 17 10 966 1080 9 16 2 41 38 e rg 14 41 R-8 R-8 1083 965 968 1081 93 105 113 125 131 137 6 Ev R-8 975 906 R-8 311 1086 237 8 215 974 0 Ev 16 RGO 319 16 er 979 1090 910 223 1169 4 10 110 gr ee 141 914 92 102 15 62 1 n R-8 108 Cir 117 113 1145 96 8 101 118 15 130 14 Wyoming Ave 1095 5 136 C-1A CPO 122 14 2 C-2A C-4 312 11 5 R-8 318 11 21 C-4 308 132 19 1 120 26 1175 21 9 27 226 11 1160 S Governors Ave 35 39 45 49 110 27 31 33 51 43 1021 218 53 215 127 125 S Bradford St 59 Roosevelt Ave R-8 C-1 1012 151 1018 1117 133 129 Monroe Ter 1004 C-4 1008 1215 R-8 C-1A Jefferson Ter 1015 12 18 1114 116 110 2 130 140 R-8 1102 1117 138 216 228 118 R-8 220 1018 114 124 126 F06 F08 1106 1019 1022 1040 112 7 122 R-8 1112 1121 1044 1025 1024 1050 1056 1116 1120 1111 1026 SC-2 1119 1030 C-4 1128 10 35 C-2A 1068 10 74 RG-2 1 R-10 r RGO 1127 ard D 1041 Mall 1255 1047 1275 C-1A CPO 10 49 10 84 C-4 10 86 10 57 39 11 1275 S State St 10 52 59 114 r 11 nD 5 nh ave Ly n 2 R-10 IO 10 5 9 116 y w tH ROS 60 p 1102 on Du 01 S 13 45 45 11 C-2A 11 5 56 4 13 2 5 11 56 nn ctor CPO e Co n Ru 1198 heon CPO Pu 13 60 nc 13 80 CPO wy nt H 16 ROS u po SD G06 0 14 1 G07 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book F07 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 44

E08 R-10 E07 20 32 40 49 bl E09 89 Pu 40 S Ba 57 ic 50 41 93 yR af ety d 94 61 85 Laure l Blvd 66 81 90 30 9 Dr 65 86 82 30 9 70 78 R-10 74 50 0 30 8 R-10 0 Tr an IO 12 8 80 69 ir 12 2 sp 116 rt a S ig ti on C o 0 11 10 4 ho 13 nS R-8 4 98 10 9 14 0 pR gree 92 12 7 d Ev er 91 14 6 R-8 14 1 85 d it R 86 14 7 a ns Tr 79 15 2 n Dr 15 1 15 8 73 15 9 67 16 4 17 5 19 1 18 5 61 19 5 17 0 19 0 0 17 19 4 18 47 18 4 6 19 8 41 Ave MHP 22 ROS 28 32 R oosevelt 31 15 1 R-8 157 River Chase Dr R-8 F07 F09 142 146 t or ec o nn RG-2 nC Ru 1 h eo n nc Pu 65 ROS 45 70 G07 G09 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book F08 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 45

E09 E08 E10 65 r 1 toH wy 1 20 ec 1 n 10 on IPM Sta te unC R C-4 on he nc Pu APZ I 2 M 0 39 5 42 R-20 83 IO 69 Rd n sit Tr a M 0 80 0 54 M 30 0 58 10 11 C-4 07 10 141 1 10 1 IPM 64 0 La ff e rty L n F08 Ba yR IPM F10 d C-4 8 10 0 70 C-3 B as ne eli n MHP La n eR s to 2 10 6 in g d Liv ark 0 M 10 8 eP er 11 ay lin 31 om W 80 C-4 s eH 6 an 110 La obil ne E v fM Sir Ct lif t ler sC rl C w Fo ing Ba K d eR s tl Ca B 115 ay R 1 d C-4 C-4 117 1 R-20 6 116 5 12 3 15 1 12 5 75 G09 G10 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book F09 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 46

R-8 E10 E09 M C-3 71 958 150 Ln 119 rty ffe 16 La W t Ho ic rs k S R-8 10 ep 59 o 26 nd 10 46 Rd 10 11 00 10 84 62 10 R-8 M 22 11 75 11 70 30 Ho rs ep 75 on d Rd IPM 62 12 APZ I IPM 141 M F09 F11 IPM 30 10 80 CZ 52 R-20 G09 G10 G11 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book F10 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 47

E10 75 CZ 70 60 Ho IPM rs ep on dR d 23 5 51 40 F10 F12 34 G a la x y Dr 33 ve 30 118 l if te r A 17 57 25 110 26 S ta r Ho rs ep on d Rd 14 21 99 10 R-8 17 66 R-8 19 86 20 22 20 40 R-8 1030 20 54 10 49 80 10 46 Ln M ays 10 65 10 75 1080 10 87 IPM 52 R-20 110 0 10 99 1116 1113 CZ 113 0 d 1125 J a ne s R 1137 114 4 116 1149 2 11 R-8 11 8 2 116 1 96 117 1 118 12 3 12 11 97 30 12 11 Ja ne s Ci G10 G12 r G11 City of Dover Delaw are Zoning Map Book F11 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 48

CZ F11 80 75 70 R-20 G11 G12 G13 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book F12 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 49

F05 F04 RG-2 40 2 F06 13 40 5 135 5 14 13 15 0 RG-2 40 9 ROS 411 RG-2 154 15 5 413 14 14 17 158 120 C-1A Rd 25 415 159 Haman Dr Turner Dr n rto 162 Alder Rd 138 139 417 Bu 163 166 w 14 167 142 143 421 Ne 14 27 31 170 425 C-3 14 171 146 147 35 R-20 174 429 175 150 151 14 178 37 179 155 431 R-8 154 1429 182 183 555 158 159 437 186 Garton Ln 443 554 187 163 C-1A 162 447 R-8 C-1A 190 191 201 166 167 4 455 19 R-8 419 415 417 C-2A 42 171 461 9 425 423 178 206 19 469 C-2A 8 2 175 20 G06 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book G05 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 50

51 F07 G07 wy nt H up o SD C-4 C-2A 15 80 C-1 1403 1596 n sL We b 1 inch = 500 feet b 9 21 R-8 7 3 20 13 26 23 RGO 7 22 rn 7 24 sG le r 1 24 d Fi d 21 2 Ave 22 4 R-8 254 sel r ing R-10 262 23 0 24 4 K es 215 23 1 23 8 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS 22 3 25 2 23 9 26 0 245 26 6 27 4 28 0 288 385 397 341 347 355 363 371 377 R-8 393 G06 321 327 296 313 333 F06 Post Blvd City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book August 9, 2010 30 2 30 2 380 390 39 6 368 374 30 1 30 2 30 1 384 30 4 30 4 30 4 30 3 30 6 30 3 30 7 30 6 30 7 30 6 30 8 31 0 311 30 8 31 2 311 31 5 31 2 31 4 31 5 R-8 31 6 RM-2 31 8 31 9 31 8 31 9 31 6 32 2 32 3 32 0 32 0 32 3 32 7 32 4 25 5 32 2 32 7 32 6 33 1 32 8 33 0 32 4 33 1 33 4 33 5 33 2 32 6 33 5 Jul 21, 2010 34 0 33 9 33 6 33 9 33 0 34 4 34 3 34 0 33 4 34 3 32 1 31 7 31 3 R-8 34 4 32 34 8 34 7 5 34 7 7 333 33 8 34 8 32 35 1 35 1 9 31 8 R-8 34 2 352 34 9 34 5 34 1 33 M ayberry Ln 35 0 32 6 R-8 35 6 35 5 314 34 6 35 5 335 36 0 35 9 35 4 336 350 341 35 9 33 2 364 361 358 347 340 363 Mimosa Ave 35 4 362 365 353 35 8 367 368 344 35 3 352 348 35 7 371 372 369 366 359 n g Av e IO Mo ckin gbird Ave R-8 36 2 360 375 376 373 370 360 364 368 365 Webbs Ln 361 364 377 374 Nottingham Ct 380 371 365 379 e lri 368 372 383 384 381 378 377 376 384 380 ss F05 Ke 40 2 40 6 37 2 410 387 414 388 392 422 385 426 382 386 383 435 Alder Rd 462 468 G05 -

F07 F06 F08 CPO r to 14 10 ec nn 16 ROS Co un nR 14 18 heo Ln n ick nc Pu R ud O ld wy 14 48 nt H up o 22 18 16 CPO SD 30 15 4 7 Co o pe r Es tate 15 57 Rd G06 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book G07 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 52

F09 F08 F10 80 75 R-20 G10 70 65 H10 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book G09 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 53

F10 F09 F11 CZ 80 G09 G11 75 R-20 65 70 US Hw y 11 3 H10 H11 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book G10 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 54

IPM F11 F10 F12 52 CZ 75 G10 R-20 G12 70 80 H10 H11 H12 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book G11 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 55

F12 F11 75 G11 R-20 G13 80 H11 H12 H13 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book G12 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 56

F12 G12 R-20 65 75 80 70 H12 H13 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book G13 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 57

G10 G09 G11 R-20 70 US Hw y 11 3 65 H11 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book H10 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 58

G11 G10 G12 R-20 80 H10 H12 CZ 65 70 75 I12 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book H11 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 59

G12 G11 G13 75 80 H11 H13 R-20 70 65 CZ I13 I12 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book H12 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 60

R-20 G13 G12 75 70 80 H12 CZ Dr 65 A ide 143 Bay APZ I s I12 I13 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book H13 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 61

H12 H11 H13 CZ R-20 Dr s id e K it A B ay ts Hu mm R-20 oc kR d 3 B ay Rd US H 13 wy 1 65 I13 APZ I 75 80 70 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book I12 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 62

R-20 H13 H12 70 APZ I Dr i de Bay s A 14 3 I12 65 City of Dover Delaware Zoning Map Book I13 - Jul 21, 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS August 9, 2010 1 inch = 500 feet 63

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-21 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF 2 DOVER BY CHANGING ZONING DESIGNATIONS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO THE 3 RECREATIONAL AND OPEN SPACE (ROS) ZONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2008 4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED ON NOVEMBER 23, 2009. 5 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within the limits 6 of the City of Dover; and 7 WHEREAS, Delaware Code, Title 22, Chapter 3 Municipal Zoning Regulations, Section 303, Purpose of 8 Regulations, states that zoning regulations shall be made in accordance with a Comprehensive Plan and 9 designed to lessen congestion in the streets, to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, to provide 10 health, general welfare, adequate light and air, to prevent the overcrowding of land, to avoid undue 11 concentration of population, and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewage, schools, 12 parks, and other public requirements; and 13 WHEREAS, Delaware Code, Title 22, Chapter 7 Planning Commission, Section 702 (c) Comprehensive 14 Development Plan, states that the Comprehensive Plan shall be the basis for the development of zoning 15 regulations and that upon adoption of the Comprehensive Development Plan, the official zoning map shall be 16 amended to rezone all lands within the municipality in accordance with the uses of land provided for in the 17 Comprehensive Development Plan; and 18 WHEREAS, the City of Dover adopted the City of Dover 2008 Comprehensive Plan on February 9, 2009 and 19 amended such on November 23, 2009; and 20 WHEREAS, on June 14, 2010, Dover City Council adopted Ordinance #2010-12, amending Appendix B - 21 Zoning to create the Recreational and Open Space (ROS) zone. 22 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has prepared a map for the Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS Rezoning, 23 showing recommendations to change zoning designations of specific properties to Recreational and Open Space 24 (ROS) zone so that the City of Dover Zoning Map is in accordance with the adopted 2008 Comprehensive Plan, 25 as amended on November 23, 2009. 26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, 27 IN COUNCIL MET: 28 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance 29 of the City of Dover is amended by changing the zoning designations of specific properties to Recreational and 30 Open Space (ROS) zone as depicted on the map entitled "City of Dover Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS 31 Rezoning" dated August 9, 2010. 32 ADOPTED: * 33 SYNOPSIS 34 The proposed ordinance would rezone certain properties to the Recreational and Open Space (ROS) 35 Zone in conformance with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, as required by Delaware Code. 36 Actions History 37 June 28, 2010 - Introduction/First Reading at Council

UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee Meeting was held on July 26, 2010 at 5:00 p.m. with Councilman McGiffin presiding in the absence of Chairman Ruane. Members present were Major Kosior and Mr. Snaman. Mr. Bonar was absent. Members of Council present were Council President Hogan and Mr. Leary. Mayor Carey was also present. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS The agenda was approved by unanimous consent. Review of New Utility Bill Format Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that a new utility bill format was previously suggested by Councilman Slavin. He relayed appreciation to the all of the participants, including citizens and City of Dover employees, that have been working on this project. Mrs. Teresa Tieman, Senior City Administrator, introduced Mrs. Kathy Divver, Customer Service Manager, and Ms. Denise Roberson, Billing Supervisor. She advised members that the format of the existing utility bill has been in place since 1998 and that the format, with a few modifications, was the standard layout available in HTE (our billing software provider). Mrs. Tieman explained that over the years, staff has received feedback regarding the current bill. She stated that last year, the Customer Service Manager was charged with the goal of designing a new billing format that would incorporate the feedback. Mrs. Tieman indicated that the bill design process began with brainstorming sessions in customer service and that, from these sessions, a draft billing format was developed. She noted that following the development of the draft bill, focus groups consisting of individuals from other divisions in the City were set up and that, in March 2010, a citizen’s focus group made up of five (5) volunteers reviewed the draft billing format and made suggestions for revisions. Mrs. Tieman stated that the revisions were then incorporated into a final format that was presented to the City Manager in April 2010. She stated that it was staff’s feeling that the final version of the new utility bill format addresses the concerns and feedback received from the focus groups. Mrs. Tieman noted that discontinuing the use of the preprinted forms will result in a cost savings and that the placement of the payment stub at the bottom of the bill will also be beneficial as we convert to a lock box for processing bill payments. Mrs. Tieman reviewed a presentation of the New Utility Bill Design (Attachment #1). Staff recommended adoption of the proposed design of the utility bill. Council President Hogan suggested that the due date be highlighted on the bill and, for clarification, that the “average cost” amount provided under the graph, include “per day”. Major Kosior moved to recommend approval of the updated design of the utility bill, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Snaman and unanimously carried. Review of Utility Related CIP’s (Electric and Water/Wastewater) Members were provided a Project Tracking Report, as of May 31, 2010, for the Utility (Electric and Water/Wastewater) Related Capital Investment Plan (CIP). Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, indicated that there were no major milestones met in this report.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 2 Responding to Council President Hogan, Mr. DePrima indicated that high temperatures cause the roads to expand and move resulting in water line breaks. He also advised members that residential transformers have expired as a result of the heat; however, he noted that these transformers have been used to their limit and are already in poor condition. Mr. DePrima assured members that these are typical issues as a result of the recent weather conditions. He reminded members that Units 1 and 2 are vintage and do not run often; however, due to the recent heat wave, these units have been used more than normal. Mr. DePrima stated that there was a tube rupture in a boiler at Unit 1, which caused the unit to be inoperable for approximately one (1) month and has been a major issue, costing an estimate of $400,000 for the repairs. Mr. Snaman moved to recommend acceptance of the Utility Related CIP’s Report, seconded by Major Kosior and unanimously carried. By unanimous consent, the meeting was adjourned at 5:20 P.M. Respectfully submitted, James G. McGiffin Acting Chairman JGM/AC/tm/jg S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Minutes\2010\07-26-2010 UTILITY.wpd Attachment to Original Minutes and File Copy Attachment #1 - Presentation - New Utility Bill Design

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Utility Committee AGENDA ITEM DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Customer Services DATE SUBMITTED: 07/15/10 PREPARED BY: Teresa Tieman- Sr City Administrator Kathleen Divver-Customer Service Manager SUBJECT: Review, discuss and approve new design for utility bill. REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: N/A REVIEWED BY: City Manager, Sr City Administrator, Focus Group, and City of Dover staff EXHIBITS: Proposed designs and presentation for new utility bill. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: N/A AMOUNT BUDGETED: N/A FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): TIMETABLE: No later than December 2010 depending on programming. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the adoption of the proposed design of the utility bill. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The City of Dover had the existing bill format since 1998. The bill format was the standard format available from HTE (our billing software provider) with a few modifications. Over the years, we have received feedback regarding the current bill. Last year, the Customer Service’s manager was charged with the goal of designing a new billing format that would incorporate the feedback. The bill design process began with brainstorming sessions in customer service. From these sessions, a draft billing format was developed. Once the draft bill format was developed it was reviewed by customer service again, then we set up focus groups made up of individuals from other divisions in the city. In March 2010, a citizen’s focus group made up of five volunteers reviewed the draft billing format and made suggestions for revisions. Those revisions were then incorporated into a final format that was presented to the City Manager in April 2010. We believe the final version presented addresses the concerns and feedback received. The new format will result in small cost savings from not using preprinted forms. Placement of the payment stub at the bottom of the bill will also be beneficial as we convert to a lock box for processing bill payments.

Pg-1 Account Information Contact Information Customer: John Doe Jr. 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Monday—Friday Service Address: 2349 North Down Dr Customer Service: 302-736-7035 Account #: 5655-65656 Emergency after 5 p.m.: 302-736-7086 Bill Date: 6/18/2010 Website: www.cityofdover.com City of Dover Due Date: 7/12/2010 BY 5p.m. (ET) * Para su factura en español visite la pagina del Other Payment Options Balance From Last Bill: _________ _ _ $ .00 Thank you! Payments since last billing: 5/21/10 $75.00 Automatic Bank Draft from checking Payments and adjustments made after this Bill Date 6/18/10 will appear on next bill. or savings account— sign up needed. Current Charges: ___ _ $ 74..80 Equalized Payment Plan - a fixed budget amount each month for residen- A late payment charge of 1.5% will be added to any balance remaining 30 days after billing. tial customers—sign up needed. Total Amount Due: _ $ 74.80 Online Payment with a credit card by visiting www.cityofdover.com or call 1-866-780-5451, a fee provided service. Meter Information - Residential Cycle Service Readings Cons Billed Dmd Customer News & Meter # Days From To Previous Present Mult Amt Dmd Adj P.F. Description Information 414588885E 30 5-17-10 6-17-10 35904 35704 200 Electric 584588885W 30 5-17-10 6-17-10 47 44 3 Water It’s almost here: the 2010 Dover 4th of July. Museums, tours, parade, food, music, kid activities and fireworks! Current Charge Calculations Contact www.dover4th.com. Electric Customer Charge $ 5.00 Electric 200 Kwh x .1450 $ 29.00 Purchase Power Adj 200 Kwh x .0028cr $ - .56cr Green Energy 200 Kwh x .000178 $ .04 Consumption History Electric Water - In City 3 Tgal x 3.00 + (1.25 water customer charge) $ 10.25 Sewer 3 Tgal x 2.65 + (1.25 sewer customer charge) $ 9.20 Kent County Sewer 3 Tgal x 2.34 $ 7.02 Groundwater inflow 3 Tgal x 1.05 $ 3.15 Trash - In City 1 @ 11.70 $ 11.70 Current Charges $ 74.80 Avg Temp: 70˚ Avg KWH: 199 Amount Due: $ 74.80 Avg Cost: $2.49 Water * See reverse side for bill explanation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please detach this portion and remit with payment made by mail or in person. Mail all correspondence to utility billing office. Check Here if updating mailing address, phone, or #5655-65656 John Doe Jr. email, and fill out back of stub. Balance From Last Bill Due Immediately $ .00 ________________ Current Charges Due 7/12/2010 $ 74.80 $74.80 Total Amount Due: $ 74.80 Payment Enclosed: City of Dover $ _ _ ._ _ Make Payments to: John Doe Jr. City of Dover c/o Mrs. Jane Dove PO Box 7100 55 W North St Dover, DE 19903-7100 Dover, DE 19901 0000000565465465465465427888699

NEW UTILITY BILL DESIGN Utility Committee Meeting July 26, 2010 1

GOAL  To provide our customers with a utility bill that contains useful billing information.  The current utility bill has been used since 1998. Over the years, our customers have made recommendations for making enhancements to the bill.  We now have the ability through technology to meet the requests. 2

CURRENT BILL 2349 North Down Drive John Doe, Jr. 2349 North Down Drive Dover, DE 19901 2349 North Down Drive 3

NEW BILL ENHANCEMENTS  In general, new format is easer to understand.  Cost savings – preprinted bills not necessary.  Account and contact info easier to find.  Bill summary clearly stated.  Meter information contained in separate highlighted section.  Service classification appears on bill.  Current charge calculations are listed with actual rates and consumption.  Additional customer news and information given it’s own section.  Consumption history included in the form of graphs.  Remittance portion located at the bottom for easier processing.  Amount due on remittance portion clearly highlighted.  Budget customers will find easy to understand calculations 4 regarding payments and balance.

5

ACCOUNT & CONTACT INFORMATION 6

ACCOUNT ACTIVITY 7

METER INFORMATION 8

CURRENT CHARGES 9

CUSTOMER NEWS & INFORMATION 10

CO SU NSUMPTION H S ISTORY 11

REMITTANCE PORTION 12

KEY PROJECT CONTRIBUTORS Citizen Focus Group Members  Thomas J. Dix (Local Resident)  Wayne B. Bobzin (Dover Mall)  Joe Kurtyka (Local Resident)  Patrice Mahon (Local Resident)  William Neaton (Economic Development)  Lisa Garner (Public Utilities) City Staff Members  Denise Roberson (Billing Supervisor /Account Clerk III), Bill Design  Mike Dickerson (IT Programmer), Bill Programming  Kathy Divver (Project Manager)  Terry Tieman (Department Head) 13

Q S UESTIONS & COMMENTS 14

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting was held on July 26, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. with Chairman Leary presiding. Members present were Mr. McGiffin, Mr. Salters, Dr. Jones, and Mr. Shevock. Council President Hogan and Mayor Carey were also present. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS The agenda was approved by unanimous consent. Review and Recommendation - Filling of Critical Positions During their meeting of February 23, 2009, members recommended approval of the Hiring Freeze for Fiscal Year 2008-2009, but to allow the hiring of critical positions through the review and approval of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee and City Council. It was suggested that there be a “standing” agenda item to consider the filling of critical positions and, if there are no positions to consider, the item could be removed. Utility Maintenance Mechanic I and II Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, reviewed a request to recruit for a Utility Maintenance Mechanic I, created by a recent employee promotion, and a Utility Maintenance Mechanic II, created due to the retirement of an employee. He reminded members that a Utility Maintenance Mechanic I position was recently recruited in March 2010, and staff requested that the existing pool of applicants be utilized for this selection. In addition, should an existing employee be promoted, staff requested that this authorization also include back filling of any vacancies created. Additionally, Mr. DePrima reminded members that the Utility Maintenance Mechanic II position was recently recruited in March and May 2010, and staff requested that the existing pool of applicants be utilized for this selection as well. Responding to Mr. Salters, Mrs. Sharon Duca, Water/Wastewater Manager, indicated that there were approximately 60-70 applicants, approximately 15 of whom were qualified candidates. She stated that although those selected for an interview were not minorities, she is unable to determine if any of the other qualified candidates are minorities since staff is not provided this information as part of the interview selection process. Mr. Salters moved to recommend that staff be granted permission to recruit for the Utility Maintenance Mechanic I and II positions, utilizing the existing pool of applicants, as requested by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. McGiffin and unanimously carried. Library Clerk I Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, reviewed a request to recruit for a Library Clerk I created by an employee’s resignation. It was noted that this is a part-time, permanent position. Responding to Mr. Salters, Ms. Margery Cyr, Library Director, indicated that the position has not been advertised and that there is no pool of applicants for this position. She explained that, although it is a part-time position, there is a schedule for the employee and applicants are made aware that occasionally it is necessary to adjust the work schedule, depending upon the needs of the library.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 2 Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend that staff be granted permission to recruit for the Library Clerk I position, as requested by staff. The motion was seconded by Dr. Jones and unanimously carried. Extension of Approval for Part-Time Account Clerk III Members were reminded that during their meeting of February 22, 2010, members recommended that staff be granted permission to recruit for the position of a temporary/part-time Account Clerk III to be filled through the Accountemps Agency for 22 weeks, beginning March 1, 2010 through July 31, 2010. This recommendation was approved by City Council during their Regular Meeting of March 8, 2010. Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, reviewed the request for an extension of approval for the Part-Time Account Clerk III position in the Finance Department through September 30, 2010. She explained that the extension is being requested due to many changes including healthcare, union contracts, the start of the new Fiscal Year on July 1, 2010, etc., which have resulted in an increased workload for the Finance Department and the Payroll Office. Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend that staff be granted permission to extend the Part-Time Account Clerk III position in the Finance Department through September 30, 2010, as requested by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried. Procedure to Fill a Vacant or New Position Members were provided with the City of Dover’s procedure for filling new and vacant positions, which is used in assisting departments who are unfamiliar with the City of Dover recruiting process. In addition, members were provided with correspondence dated April 17, 2009 to Dr. Bobby Jones in reference to the City developing a relationship with historically black colleges and universities in the surrounding states. Mr. DePrima, City Manager, provided members with updated information regarding job posting information (Attachment #1). In response to concerns of members, Mr. DePrima indicated that some department heads have utilized old recruitment forms; however, he assured members that the job posting ads are placed with those listed on the job posting information sheet provided to members (see Attachment #1). In an effort to improve the City’s minority recruitment, Mr. DePrima stated that, in addition to the posting of ads, vacancy notices are sent to those listed as “Out-of-House Postings.” He advised members that this list is periodically updated. Responding to Mr. Salters, Ms. Elaine Edwards, Human Resources and Safety Coordinator, advised members that currently, staff does not inquire as to how an applicant is made aware of a position; however, she suggested that this could be incorporated on the application to make this determination. Mr. Salters moved to recommend acceptance of the procedure to fill vacant and new positions, seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 3 Proposed Ordinance #2010-23 - Related to Requirement to Step Down When Running for Other Office During the Regular Council Meeting of July 12, 2010, members accepted the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee’s recommendation to remove the requirement to resign from all memberships prior to running for other offices and directed staff to prepare the appropriate proposed ordinances to eliminate the resignation requirement. As a result, staff prepared proposed Ordinance #2010-23 that would remove the requirement to step down from the Ethics Commission, Dover Human Relations Commission, and City Council when running for another office. Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend adoption of Ordinance #2010-23, as presented by staff, seconded by Mr. Salters. Council President Hogan relayed objections with eliminating the resignation requirements for City Council, as specified in Lines #44-#48. The motion to recommend adoption of proposed Ordinance #2010-23, as presented by staff (Attachment #2), was unanimously carried. Discussion - Public Indecency Ordinance (Sponsors: Salters, Bonar, and Russell) At the request of Mr. Salters, the City Clerk’s Office conducted research regarding the wearing of pants below the waist in public, which was provided to members. Mr. Salters suggested that the City consider a public indecency ordinance that would ensure decency in public dress. He advised members of a recent occurrence of public indecency at the Dover Post Office which was offensive to him and other patrons. In addition, he reminded members that Mr. EShed Alston recently provided members with several proposed ordinances and reviewed a proposed public indecency ordinance during the Open Forum Segment of their Regular Meeting of July 12, 2010. He requested that members support the development of a Public Indecency Ordinance. Mr. Leary noted the receipt of a legal opinion provided by City Solicitor Rodriguez, dated July 23, 2010 (Attachment #3), which indicated that this matter is a highly controversial regulation and raises severe questions of constitutional rights violations. As a result, he noted that the City Solicitor has requested the opportunity to conduct extensive research on the project prior to the development of a specific ordinance. Dr. Jones suggested that, as members consider this matter, indecent exposure should be better defined, explaining that in addition to buttock cleavage, it was her opinion that breast cleavage is also indecent exposure. Mr. McGiffin advised members that there is State Law that addresses the issue of indecency, noting that the area has been legislated. However, he concurred with the City Solicitor regarding the need to conduct extensive research to avoid the passage of an ordinance that does not pass “constitutional muster.”

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 4 As an alternative, Council President Hogan suggested the possibility of requiring a dress code for City Hall similar to that which has been established by the Courts. Dr. Jones moved to recommend that this matter be referred to the City Solicitor for further study and report back to the Committee, seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried. Title V Grant Application - Growing Up and Meeting Each Success (GAMES) Partnership with Aid in Dover Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that Aid in Dover had submitted a concept paper for a three (3) year grant through the Criminal Justice Council for delinquency prevention. She stated that Aid in Dover was selected to submit a formal application in conjunction with the City of Dover for the funding. The proposal is for an after school program called GAMES (Growing Up and Meeting Each Success) that will help participants aged 10-18 years develop soft skills for life’s challenges. The program will meet twice weekly, and instruction will include anti-bullying, common courtesy and etiquette, conflict resolution, time management, self-image repair, and community service. Mrs. Townshend indicated that the City’s Youth Advisory Committee will supervise the program. Members were provided with the grant application. The grant award is $32,000, with a proposed $21,339 match through in-kind services. Mrs. Townshend indicated that members should make a recommendation to Council regarding acceptance of the grant as the municipal sponsor in partnership with Aid in Dover. Responding to Mr. Leary, Mrs. Townshend, explained that the City’s Grant Procedure requires a department grant application analysis to be completed. Due to the timing of the grant (receipt of materials and application deadline with the Criminal Justice Council), she advised members that the procedure was not completely followed. Mr. McGiffin relayed concerns with the Director of Planning and Community Development being held responsible as the administrator for the grant, considering the other goals and responsibilities of this position. He also felt that the grant is not relative to Planning or Community Development. Responding, Mrs. Townshend explained that the previous administrator for this grant was the Weed and Seed Coordinator and when this employee left there was no other employee to whom the grant could be assigned. She requested that the Police Department assume the responsibilities; however, they indicated that they do not have the capacity to do so at this time. Mr. McGiffin felt that the grant administrator should be an employee of the Police Department or Parks and Recreation Department. He also noted that there is no record that the Youth Advisory Committee has agreed to supervise the program. Mr. Salters moved to recommend that the grant request be deferred until properly prepared and concerns of the Committee have been resolved, seconded by Mr. McGiffin and unanimously carried.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 5 Results of Workers’ Compensation Fund Actuarial Review Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, reminded members that the City of Dover is self-insured for Workers’ Compensation and has established a separate fund to account for these activities. The City recently engaged AMI Risk Consultants, Inc. to perform the following functions for its self-insured workers’ compensation fund: • Estimate the funding requirements as of December 31, 2009 to comply with the Government Accounting Standards Board Statement Number 10 (GASB 10). Results – Estimated $1,487,000 • Project the funding requirement as of December 31, 2010 in accordance with GASB 10. Results – Estimated $1,448,000 • Estimate the ultimate losses for new claims occurring during prospective fiscal accident year 2010 – 2011. (Please note – For cash flow purposes, payments are made for old and new claims; these are new claims only) Results – Estimated $639,000 • Review current workers’ compensation rates and provide recommended changes. Result – Revised rates are being analyzed to determine the impact on the FY12 budget Mrs. Mitchell advised members that the funding requirements include liabilities retained for claims, claim adjustments, incurred but not reported claims, credit for investment income, and contingencies for adverse results. The requirements do not include general and administrative expenses of the program. The actuarial study was conducted based on the Claims Administrator’s records of past claims experience, open claims, and payroll information provided by the Finance Department. Mrs. Mitchell stated that the City has budgeted $450,000 (cash payments) for claims in FY11 and has a projected Budget Balance of $1,424,790. The current funding level is in line with the study and no action is required. Should action be required as a result of claims exceeding the City’s projections, she indicated that staff would submit the adjustments in the FY12 Budget. Staff recommended acceptance of Actuarial Study. Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend acceptance of the Actuarial Study Report, as presented by staff. The motion was seconded by Dr. Jones and unanimously carried. OPEB Actuary Interim Update Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, reviewed the Interim Year Government Accounting Standard Board (GASB) 45 Disclosures for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010, which was provided to members. Mr. Salters moved to recommend acceptance of the Interim Year Government Accounting Standard Board (GASB) 45 Disclosures for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 as presented by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JULY 26, 2010 PAGE 6 Health Care Reform - Summary of Changes Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, reviewed the Health Care Reform Summary of Changes that affect employer group health plans. She advised members that the information is the result of her requesting the City’s Actuary to highlight the changes of the Federal Legislation for Healthcare and any impact it would have on the City of Dover as an employer. Mrs. Mitchell noted that the Dover Impact for the Re-Insurance Program indicates that Nyhart recommended that the City apply for the Re-Insurance Program, since the State of Delaware is applying for the Re-insurance Program. She assured members that the City will not have any involvement unless the City withdraws from the State Healthcare Insurance Program. Referring to Item #18, Excise Tax on Cadillac Plans, Mrs. Mitchell noted that the amount of $10,207 projected for single coverage for 2018 was calculated based on the 2009 premiums. She stated that she has since calculated this amount using the 2011 premiums, which would change the amount to $11,937. Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend acceptance of the Health Care Reform - Summary of Changes Report as presented by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried. Proposed Resolution #2010-08 in Support of the Local Jobs for America Act During their meeting of July 12, 2010, the Committee considered a request for a proposed Resolution in support of the Local Jobs for America Act and deferred action in order to allow time to revise the Resolution and obtain additional information. Due to time constraints, it was noted that this item has been placed on the agenda for the Regular Council Meeting being held later in the evening. Mr. Salters moved to recommend adoption of Resolution #2010-08 in support of the Local Jobs for America Act (Attachment #4), seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. By unanimous consent, the meeting adjourned at 6:35 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Thomas J. Leary Chairman TJL/ac/tm/jg S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Minutes\2010\07-26-2010 LF&A .wpd Attachments Attachment #1 - Job Posting Information Attachment #2 - Ordinance #2010-23 - Requirement to Step Down When Running for Other Office Attachment #3 - Correspondence from City Solicitor Rodriguez dated July 23, 2010 - Public Indecency Ordinance Attachment #4 - Resolution #2010-08 - In Support of the Local Jobs for America Act

ATTACHMENT #1 LF&A Committee Meeting of 07/26/2010

ATTACHMENT #2 LF&A Committee Meeting of 07/26/2010 CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-23 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN 2 COUNCIL MET: 3 That Article II - Mayor and Council, Section 5 - Council to be legislative body; size; districts; terms 4 of mayor and councilmen; qualifications, of the Charter of the City of Dover shall be amended by 5 deleting the text indicated in red strikeout as follows: 6 Sec. 5. Council to be legislative body; size; districts; terms of mayor and councilmen; 7 qualifications. 8 The council shall be the legislative body of the city and composed of nine members 9 nominated and elected as herein provided. 10 In order that the members of council shall be distributed over the city, the city shall be 11 divided into four election districts, the district boundaries of which shall be established by council 12 so that the districts are nearly equal in population as shown by the most recent federal decennial 13 census. The district boundaries established for municipal elections shall continue in effect until the 14 next succeeding federal decennial census is made available for use by municipalities in the State of 15 Delaware, at which time council shall redistrict the city so that the districts shall be nearly equal in 16 population in accordance with said census, which redistricting shall be used for the next regular 17 municipal election, which procedure shall be followed by council after each succeeding federal 18 decennial census in this manner so that the districts shall be maintained as nearly equal in population 19 as possible at all times. 20 The term of mayor shall be for a period of two years commencing on the second Monday in 21 May following their election and continuing for a term of two years until the second Monday in May 22 or until their successor has been duly elected and qualified. 23 The term of the councilmen shall be for two years. In each regular municipal election held 24 in an odd numbered year, five councilmen shall be elected, four by district voting being from the 25 districts and one at-large as stated herein. In each regular municipal election held in an even 26 numbered year, four councilmen shall be elected by district voting from each of the districts of the 27 city. 28 In order to be eligible to be elected as mayor or as a member of council, the person must as 29 of the date of the election be: 30 (1) A citizen of the United States and of the State of Delaware; 31 (2) A resident of the city and having continuously resided therein or in an area annexed 32 to the city during the two years next preceding the day of the election; 33 (3) A resident of the election district from which they are seeking election, unless they 34 are seeking election as an at-large councilman or mayor; 35 (4) Eighteen years of age; and 36 (5) Nominated therefore, as hereinafter provided.

Proposed Ordinance #2010-23 - Requirement to Step Down When Running for Other Office Page 2 37 Holding Other Office. Except where authorized by law, no council members shall hold any 38 other elected public office during the term for which the member was elected to the council. No 39 council member shall hold any other city office or employment during the term for which the 40 member was elected to the council. No former council members shall hold any compensated 41 appointive office or employment with the city until one year after the expiration of the term for 42 which the member was elected to the council, unless granted a waiver by the Board of Ethics (Ethics 43 Commission). 44 If a councilman files and runs for mayor, whether or not they are elected to said office, 45 the term as councilman shall automatically expire on the second Monday of May on the year 46 of the election; and if they have a year remaining on their term, then their office as councilman 47 shall he filled at the same annual election in which they have filed to run for the office of 48 mayor. 49 Legislation requesting the Charter amendment shall be presented to the General Assembly of the 50 State of Delaware. 51 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED 52 That Chapter 30 - Code of Conduct and Ethics Commission, Article III - Ethics Commission, 53 Section 30-71 - Established; composition; removal; terms of office; vacancies; chairperson; quorum; 54 compensation; legal counsel, Paragraph (a) - Established; composition; removal, be amended by 55 deleting the text indicated in red strikeout as follows: 56 ARTICLE III. ETHICS COMMISSION 57 Sec. 30-71. Established; composition; removal; terms of office; vacancies; chairperson; quorum; 58 compensation; legal counsel. 59 (a) Established; composition; removal. The city ethics commission is hereby established 60 to administer and implement this chapter. The ethics commission shall consist of five 61 members appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the city council. No member of the 62 commission shall hold any elected or appointed office under the government of the United 63 States or the state, county, or city, or be a candidate for any such office. Members of the 64 ethics commission may be removed by the mayor, with the concurrence of the city council, 65 for substantial neglect of duty, gross misconduct in office or a violation of this chapter. 66 (b) Terms of office; vacancies. A member of the ethics commission shall be appointed for 67 a term of office of five years and until his successor has been appointed and has qualified. 68 The members shall be appointed for staggered terms of office, and until their successors have 69 been appointed. When a vacancy occurs in the membership of the ethics commission, it shall 70 be filled by appointment for the unexpired portion of the term in the same manner as the 71 original appointment. 72 (c) Chairperson; quorum. The ethics commission shall elect a chairperson from among its 73 membership. Three members of the ethics commission shall constitute a quorum and, if a

Proposed Ordinance #2010-23 - Requirement to Step Down When Running for Other Office Page 3 74 quorum is present, a vacancy on the ethics commission shall not impair the right of the 75 remaining members to exercise all the powers of the ethics commission. Disciplinary 76 hearings may be conducted and sanctions may be imposed only by the affirmative action of 77 at least three members; otherwise, the ethics commission may delegate authority to the 78 chairperson to act for the ethics commission between meetings. 79 (d) Compensation. Members of the ethics commission shall receive no compensation. 80 (e) Legal counsel. The city solicitor shall provide legal counsel to the ethics commission 81 and shall be the legal representative of the ethics commission in connection with its duties 82 hereunder, on a case-by-case basis, or determine that outside counsel is needed and obtain 83 such outside counsel for a particular matter. 84 (Code 1981, § 2-13; Ord. of 7-13-1998) 85 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED 86 That Chapter 58 - Human Relations, Article II - Human Relations Commission, Section 58-32 - 87 Established; composition; appointment; representation; holding other office; removal from office; 88 terms of office; vacancies; reappointments, be amended by deleting the text indicated in red strikeout 89 as follows: 90 Sec. 58-32. Established; composition; appointment; representation; holding other office; 91 removal from office; terms of office; vacancies; reappointments. 92 (a) Established. There is hereby established an advisory commission to be known as the 93 "City of Dover Human Relations Commission," to carry out the objectives as described in 94 this article. 95 (b) Composition; appointment. The commission shall consist of 15 members, all residents 96 of the city. Five of these members shall be appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the city 97 council. Ten of these members shall be appointed by the president of the council, based upon 98 recommendations from the council and confirmed by the council. 99 (c) Representation. In selecting the membership of the commission, the mayor and president 100 of the council and the council shall take particular care to ensure that the commission is 101 broadly representative of racial, religious, gender and ethnic groups residing in the city. 102 (d) Holding other office; removal. No member of the commission shall hold any elected or 103 appointed office under the government of the United States or the state, county, or city, or 104 be a candidate for any such office. The mayor or the city council president may remove 105 members of the commission, with the concurrence of the city council, for substantial neglect 106 of duty, or gross misconduct in office.

Proposed Ordinance #2010-23 - Requirement to Step Down When Running for Other Office Page 4 107 (e) Terms of office; vacancies. A member of the commission shall be appointed for a term 108 of office of three years and until his successor has been appointed and has qualified. The 109 appointees shall be appointed for staggered terms of office. When a vacancy occurs in the 110 membership of the commission, it shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired portion 111 of the term in the same manner as the original appointment. 112 (f) Reappointments. Members may be reappointed. 113 ADOPTED: * 114 SYNOPSIS 115 This amendment would remove the requirement to step down when running for other 116 office from the Ethics Commission, Dover Human Relations Commission, and City 117 Council members. 118 Actions History 119 July 26, 2010 - Scheduled for Consideration by the Legislative, Finance, and Administration 120 Committee 121 S:\ORDINANCES\2010\Draft Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-23 - Chpt 30 - Requirement to Step Down When Running for Office.wpd

ATTACHMENT #3 LF&A Committee Meeting of 07/26/2010

ATTACHMENT #4 LF&A Committee Meeting of 07/26/2010 City of Dover MAYOR AND COUNCIL 1 DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2010-08 2 A RESOLUTION PROPOSING THE SUPPORT OF THE LOCAL JOBS FOR AMERICA ACT 3 WHEREAS, the City of Dover employs 394 workers in jobs ranging from city administration to trash collection, 4 and public safety; 5 WHEREAS, despite signs of national economic recovery, the City of Dover continues to face significant budget 6 shortfalls due to the loss of revenues from property taxes, construction permits, and real estate transfer taxes; 7 and 8 WHEREAS, the loss of revenues is significant enough that it may force the City of Dover to keep important jobs 9 vacant, including police officers, and others who provide critical services; and 10 WHEREAS, such vacancies contribute to an increase in the lack of fiscal stability for this community, and 11 further contribute to the nation’s unemployment rate just as the economy begins to recover; and 12 WHEREAS, federal aid will be necessary if the City of Dover is to avoid reducing public services, increasing 13 police and other job vacancies, or significant increases in taxes to pay the salaries of these employees. 14 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Dover endorses H.R. 4812, the “Local Jobs for 15 America Act,” because it would assist cities across America including Dover, community-based organizations, 16 and private employers to retain and hire new employees; 17 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Dover supports the funding levels proposed in this legislation, 18 including: 19 · $75 billion over two years to local governments and community-based organizations to retain or 20 create public service jobs designed to ensure that city and other services are maintained; 21 · $23 billion to local school districts for one year so that they may retain and create up to 250,000 new 22 jobs; 23 · $1.18 billion so that local governments may employ 5,500 new law enforcement and $500 million 24 to retain, rehire, and hire firefighters; and 25 · Funding for 50,000 on-the-job private-sector training positions. 26 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Dover supports H.R. 4812 because it would prevent state and 27 local governments from having to choose between eliminating services and raising taxes; and 28 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Dover supports H.R. 4812 because it would help stimulate local 29 businesses and create additional jobs in the local economy; and P.O. Box 475 ˜ Dover, Delaware ˜19903 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2010-08 PAGE 2 30 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Dover urges Congress and the President to adopt H.R. 4812 into 31 law and fund the provisions outlined in the legislation immediately so that cities and towns across America can 32 retain existing employees and provide employment opportunities in the public and private sectors. 33 ADOPTED: * 34 S:\PACKETS\2010\Committee\LF&A\07-26-2010\Proposed Resolution 2010-08 In Support of the Local Jobs for America Act.wpd 35 36 CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. KENNETH L. HOGAN 37 MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT 38 Actions History: 39 July 26, 2010 - Considered by Legislative, Finance, and Administrative Committee 40 July 12, 2010 - Deferred by Legislative, Finance, and Administrative Committee

Dover Police Department Monthly Report To Mayor & City Council “To Protect and Serve” June 2010

July 13, 2010 Honorable Carleton E. Carey, Sr., Mayor Members of Dover City Council City Hall Dover, DE 19901 Mayor Carey and Council Members: The following is the report on Police Department activities for the month of June 2010: COMPLAINTS Total complaints received through June 30th 20,000 numbered 16,216. This is an increase of 2,631* 15,126 14,677 14,966 16,216 complaints over the same time period for last year. 16,000 13,585 12,000 *Such a large increase is due in part to all calls for service are now included in total. 8,000 4,000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS 18 11 Cases Reported in 12 June 7 Cases Cleared in 6 5 June 6 4 3 3 Cases Cleared from Previous Months 0 0 0 Burglary Robbery Rape

Report to Mayor and Council June 2010 Page 2 QUALITY OF LIFE TASK SECTION ENFORCEMENT ACTION ARRESTS ABANDONED VEHICLES 2 ALCOHOL VIOLATIONS/DUI’S 7 ASSIST OTHER 0 WARRANTS ON FILE 0 BIKE ON SIDEWALK 5 CITY PARK VIOLATIONS 3 CRIMINAL ARRESTS 18 DRUG RELATED ARRESTS 0 LOUD MUSIC 27 MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS 7 PARKING VIOLATIONS 27 PEDDLER 0 MEETINGS 10 PROSTITUTION 0 COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT DCO’S 0 WANTED CHECKS/CPC’S 21 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 74 WARNINGS 29 FUGITIVE 11 TOTAL ARRESTS 241 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 12,000 10,510 9,711 9,204 9,043 9,147 The department issued 9,204 traffic citations through this reporting period. This is a decrease of 1,306 citations over the 8,000 number issued during the same period last year. 4,000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 TRAFFIC CRASHES Through June 30th, Dover Police investigated 914 traffic crashes. This is a decrease of 70 accidents investigated 1,800 during the same period last year. 1,093 1,200 1,008 984 945 914 600 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Report to Mayor and Council June 2010 Page 3 911 CENTER 11% During the month of June, our 911 Center handled a total of 10,833 calls averaging 362 calls per day. 911 Landline Dispatchers handled 2,183 calls on the 911 wireless 20% 911 Wireless lines, an average of 73 calls per day and 1,140 calls on the 911 landlines, an average of 38 calls per day. Administrative 69% CITY ORDINANCE SUMMONS 6,000 5,057 4,651 4,639 th 3,699 4,172 Through June 30 , we issued 3,993 city ordinance 3,595 3,993 summons, a decrease of 179 summons over June of last 4,000 3,368 2,912 2,623 year. *Note: of those summonses issued in June, 21 were issued for handicapped parking violations, 15 for fire lane parking violations, 75 for false alarms (59 for 3-5 alarms, 2,000 11 for 6-9 alarms, 2 for 10-15 alarms, and 3 for 16 or more alarms) and 106 for noise violations (98 for vehicle 0 violations and 8 for residence violations). 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ISSUED PAID Listed below are the major crimes and activities that occurred during the month of June: • On June 2, 2010, Dover Officers apprehended a suspect, as they were responding to a an alarm at US Gas. Officers observed Defendant on a bicycle carrying large garbage bags which contained an assortment of cigarettes he had just stolen from the business. Investigation revealed that Defendant was also responsible for 7 additional burglaries dating back to January of this year: • The Dover Police Department and Dover Fire Marshal's Office are conducting a joint investigation of a fire which has claimed the lives of two female residents at the Woodcrest Apartments. On June 6, 2010, the Dover Police Department and the Dover Fire Department responded to a fire at the apartments. The building, which has 28 apartments inside, was fully involved. The Dover Fire Department along with assistance from numerous other Volunteer Fire Departments was able to gain control and extinguish the fire. Four of the residents were transported to BayHealth where they are being treated for minor injuries. Two other residents were transported to Crozer Chester Burn Center in critical condition, one of which later died. Upon an initial search of the building, firefighters located the body of a deceased adult female inside of one of the apartments. • On June 2, 2010, the Dover Police School Resource Officer (SRO), which is assigned to Dover High School, received a crime stoppers tip in relation to drug activity at the school. Further investigation by the SRO and the school led to the arrest of a 15 year old female Defendant. The investigation revealed that she had delivered marijuana to another student, apparently to hold for her, and had smoked some of the marijuana, at the school earlier in the day. Two other students were arrested for possession and/or consumption of marijuana. They were released to their parents. • On June 09, 2010, Dover Officers responded to a report of numerous shots fired in the area of River Road. Shortly thereafter a 24 year old male victim showed up at BayHealth with a gunshot wound to his left calf. Apparently an altercation between 10-15 subjects broke out in front of the victim’s residence and when he walked outside he was shot. Suspect is described as a black male wearing a black fitted hat, black hooded sweatshirt, and facial hair.

Report to Mayor and Council June 2010 Page 4 Major crimes and activities that occurred during the month of June continued: • On June 6, 2010, a subject unlawfully entered the Holy Cross Church after it had closed and once inside used an unknown tool to reach in and remove approximately $50.00 from the donation box. The subject was identified through surveillance video and was apprehended by the Dover Police on June 11, 2010 in the area of the Dover Public Library. • On June 17, 2010, the Dover Police Department issued a courtesy notification to all residents and visitors in the City of Dover. Loud noise continues to be a problem within the city generating hundreds of calls for service each year. The Dover Police are making a push to correct this problem through strict enforcement of all loud noise violators. We are attempting to gain an atmosphere of voluntary compliance from our citizens, as well as visitors of the city, and this is only accomplished through a “Zero Tolerance” approach of strict enforcement. We are asking for cooperation from all to ensure a peaceful and safe environment. The Dover Police Department issued 106 Loud Noise Summons during the month of June. There were 98 issued to loud vehicles and 8 issued to loud parties. • On June 21, 2010, Dover Officers responded to a shoplifting complaint at the Wawa. Upon arrival, the officer contact a subject who had just entered the passenger seat of a vehicle. While taking him into custody, the officer smelled marijuana and a further search of the vehicle located 138.3 grams of marijuana, Zanax, and a handgun. • On June 23, 2010, Dover Officers responded to reports of shots fired in Towne Point and upon arrival officers located the victim, a 28 year old Dover man, who had been shot multiple times including once in the head. He was transported to BayHealth and stabilized then flown to Christiana Hospital where he remains in critical condition. Detectives identified the shooter. He was charged on Friday June 25, 2010 with Attempted Murder 1st, Possession of a Firearm During Commission of a Felony, and Possession of a Firearm By a Person Prohibited. • On June 22, 2010, a white male entered the lobby at the Comfort Inn and asked the clerk for $100.00. When the clerk did not comply, the suspect then stated that he had a gun the clerk gave him $100. Suspect then fled out the front door. He was spotted the next day in the downtown area and contacted where he was positively identified through the hotel lobby surveillance video. • On Monday June 28, 2010, Dover Officers responded to the parking lot of Super Fresh for an attempted robbery complaint. Officers contacted the 61 year old female victim who advised that a white female grabbed her purse and attempted to remove it from her. After a brief struggle the suspect fled in a light colored vehicle. The victim was able to obtain the vehicles registration which led to the identification of the suspect. The suspect was arrested at her residence without incident. • On June 28, 2010, Mayor Carey swore in the newest member of the Dover Police Department. Terrence M. Knight. Ptlm. Knight came to the department as a certified officer from DNREC. The Department also hired Christopher Boyce on June 28, 2010 as a certified officer. He comes to us from out of state and will be sworn in at later date after he completes Delaware COPT Training. • On June 30, 2010, Dover Officers responded to a report of a kidnapping in the area of the Wal-Mart. The 23 year old victim had been taken from her home in Greensboro, MD at knifepoint by her boyfriend. Apparently the victim was able to notify Wal-Mart security, who allowed her to call 911. Upon the officers’ arrival, the suspect fled on foot and after a lengthy chase was apprehended by Dover Officers in a wooded area behind CF Schwartz. The suspect had left a child in the vehicle unattended when he fled. Officers recovered 3 knives that he apparently threatened the victim with. Two officers received injury during the foot pursuit and subsequent apprehension. Respectfully Submitted, James E. Hosfelt, Jr. Chief of Police

Monthly Report June 2010 Office of City Assessor

Assessor’s Report Major Updates Apr‐10 May‐10 June‐10 Assessment Change $11,438,900 $0 $312,856,020 Residential Sales Ratio Report Sales in Study Total Assessed Value Total Sale Price Ratio PRD 21 $3,137,500 $3,333,300 0.94 0.99 Ratio – Assessed Value divided by Sale Price. PRD – Mean – A PRD above 1.03 tends to indicate assessment regressivity – high valued properties are under appraised relative to low valued properties. A PRD below .98 tends to indicate assessment progressivity – high valued properties are relatively over appraised.

Assessor’s Report Points of Interest Scanning & Filing ‐ All new deeds are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. ‐ All appeal documents and correspondence are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. ‐ All deeds from 2006 through current day are scanned and attached to our software. ‐ Hard Copies of original property record cards are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. of previous years history. Assessor’s Office ‐Conducting commercial appeals (see attached spread sheet and minutes of the meetings)

City of Dover Sales Ratio Report for June 2010 PARID Address Total Assesesed Val. Sales DT Price ASR ED05‐056.20‐01‐24.00 171 MAPLE GLEN DR 235,100 29‐Jun‐10 250,000 0.94 ED05‐067.01‐01‐03.00 11 MINERAL CT 291,100 29‐Jun‐10 229,900 1.27 ED05‐067.16‐01‐30.00 639 N WEST ST 133,300 4‐Jun‐10 135,000 0.99 ED05‐067.18‐02‐09.00 656 INDEPENDENCE BLVD 182,000 4‐Jun‐10 183,000 0.99 ED05‐068.09‐02‐43.00 703 MILLER DR 141,500 14‐Jun‐10 136,500 1.04 ED05‐068.18‐04‐30.00 193 MITSCHER RD 101,500 4‐Jun‐10 97,500 1.04 ED05‐076.06‐03‐49.00 474 INDEPENDENCE BLVD 161,500 30‐Jun‐10 168,000 0.96 ED05‐076.06‐04‐13.00 11 LAMPLIGHTER LN 99,800 21‐Jun‐10 96,000 1.04 ED05‐076.06‐04‐19.00 30 LAMPLIGHTER LN 100,700 20‐Jun‐10 124,000 0.81 ED05‐076.06‐06‐29.00 150 HAMPTON DR 103,900 23‐Jun‐10 121,000 0.86 ED05‐076.06‐07‐70.00 1220 AFTON CT 96,700 29‐Jun‐10 120,000 0.81 ED05‐076.06‐08‐32.00 129 PERIWINKLE DR 133,400 14‐Jun‐10 134,500 0.99 ED05‐076.07‐02‐02.00 747 BICENTENNIAL BLVD 208,900 14‐Jun‐10 220,000 0.95 ED05‐076.09‐03‐61.00 416 NORTHDOWN DR 157,600 15‐Jun‐10 185,000 0.85 ED05‐076.13‐01‐09.00 118 TRAFALGAR DR 144,600 8‐Jun‐10 165,000 0.88 ED05‐076.13‐04‐38.00 121 WESTOVER DR 131,700 22‐Jun‐10 150,000 0.88 ED05‐076.0‐02‐47.00 1131 OAK LN 159,100 18‐Jun‐10 170,000 0.94 ED05‐077.06‐02‐18.00 781 S HALSEY RD 112,800 3‐Jun‐10 137,900 0.82 ED05‐077.07‐01‐41.00 45 MORIARTY ST 122,400 18‐Jun‐10 135,000 0.91 ED05‐077.11‐2‐18.00 598 CRAWFORD AVE 127,900 30‐Jun‐10 177,000 0.72 ED05‐077.17‐02‐43.00 952 MONROE TER 192,000 4‐Jun‐10 198,000 0.97 3,137,500 3,333,300 19.64

Appeals for Year 2010 Residential Requ./Decisi Appeal # Name PIN # Current Assess. on Assess. RES2010‐001 Voshell, Emil B ED05‐068.18‐04‐50.00 $199,000 $191,900 RES2010‐002 Simpson, Adam LC05‐068.08‐01‐09.00 $287,000 $264,300 RES2010‐003 Crenshaw, Teresa A ED05‐067.20‐03‐85.00 $195,200 $191,500 RES2010‐004 Shepperson, Timothy ED05‐085.08‐01‐43.00 $190,700 $190,700 RES2010‐005 Miller, Anthony & Patricia LC05‐058.14‐01‐01.223 $112,900 $112,900 RES2010‐006 Parker, Innus R ED05‐057.17‐02‐20.00 $175,200 $175,200 RES2010‐007 Penntex LLC ED05‐077.17‐06‐02.01 $266,500 $114,000 RES2010‐008 Brockton, James LC05‐058.14‐01‐01.701 $122,100 $122,100 RES2010‐009 Racz, Elsie LC05‐058.14‐01‐01.310 $119,900 $119,900 RES2010‐010 Simpson, William M. ED05‐077.16‐02‐12.01 $125,100 $93,800 RES2010‐011 Simpson, William M. ED05‐077.16‐02‐12.01 $0 $0 RES2010‐012 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐15.00 $41,700 $41,700 RES2010‐013 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐16.00 $56,600 $56,600 RES2010‐014 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐17.00 $35,100 $35,100 RES2010‐015 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐18.00 $39,100 $39,100 RES2010‐016 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐19.00 $55,400 $55,400 RES2010‐017 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐14.00 $55,200 $55,200 RES2010‐018 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐28.00 $40,900 $40,900 RES2010‐019 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐21.00 $89,400 $82,800 RES2010‐020 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐20.00 $44,600 $44,600 RES2010‐021 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐26.00 $43,200 $43,200 RES2010‐022 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐25.00 $55,000 $55,000 RES2010‐023 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐24.00 $94,100 $47,400 RES2010‐024 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐27.00 $39,000 $39,000 RES2010‐025 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐22.00 $71,100 $71,100 RES2010‐026 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐23.00 $47,400 $47,400 RES2010‐027 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐13.00 $55,300 $55,300 RES2010‐028 Simpson, William M. LC05‐068.08‐01‐29.00 $41,800 $41,800 RES2010‐029 McDowell, John W. ED05‐068.17‐02‐29.00 $145,900 $137,800 RES2010‐030 Shahin, Nina & Mazen ED05‐067.17‐03‐185.00 $286,700 $286,700 RES2010‐031 Tuttle, Joseph & Mary LC05‐058.14‐01‐01.017 $94,700 $94,700 RES2010‐032 Kesselring, Larry ED05‐085.00‐01‐07.02 $69,300 $69,300 RES2010‐033 Scarborough, Jon M & Sallie ED05‐067.09‐02‐03.00 $350,300 $337,800 RES2010‐034 Bieker, Richard F & Kathleen A ED05‐076.07‐01‐02.00 $112,500 $112,500

RES2010‐035 Tolbert, Frederick LC05‐058.18‐01‐23.00 $114,300 $114,300 RES2010‐036 Dillard, Richard T & Darlene M ED05‐077.05‐04‐08.00 $197,600 $159,400 RES2010‐037 Dillard, Richard T & Darlene M ED05‐077.05‐04‐08.01 $189,900 $153,700 RES2010‐038 Girgis, George H ED05‐067.14‐02‐13.00 $111,800 $111,800 RES2010‐040 Truitt, Betty B ED05‐079.05‐07‐32.00 $263,200 $263,200 RES2010‐041 Tipsword, Dorothy M ED05‐068.19‐01‐36.00 $180,200 $135,000 RES2010‐042 Tam Doan ED05‐077.17‐04‐58.00 $123,100 $120,900 RES2010‐044 Probst Ruth LC05‐068.00‐01‐10.00 $69,900 $50,000 RES2010‐045 Probst Ruth LC05‐068.00‐01‐09.00 $116,900 $50,000 RES2010‐046 Probst Ruth LC05‐068.00‐01‐11.00 $155,200 $155,200 RES2010‐047 Probst Ruth LC05‐068.00‐01‐22.01 $84,000 deactivated RES2010‐048 Probst Ruth LC05‐068.00‐01‐22.00 $97,400 $149,700 RES2010‐049 Mays Earl ED05‐076.20‐04‐06.00 $217,100 $217,100 RES2010‐050 Bedwell Virginia ED05‐077.06‐01‐53.00 $199,400 $199,400 RES2010‐051 Kelly Pamelia ED05‐085.12‐03‐42.00 $187,200 $187,200 RES2010‐052 Carey Deborah ED05‐085.08‐03‐19.00 $179,400 $179,400 RES2010‐053 Harman Brothers LLC ED05‐068.18‐05‐47.00 $43,300 $43,300 RES2010‐054 Schultz , James W Jr. & Dorothy ED05‐067.14‐03‐33.00 $114,100 $117,300 RES2010‐055 Schultz , James W Jr. & Dorothy ED05‐067.14‐02‐19.00 $118,400 $118,500 RES2010‐056 Schultz , James W Jr. & Dorothy ED05‐076.06‐03‐44.00 $143,100 $143,100 $6,663,400 $6,135,200 $528,200 Commercial Appeal Appeal # Name PIN# Current Assess. Requ. Assess. COM2010‐001 Aaron O. and Dolores J Knopf ED05‐085.12‐01‐39.01 $482,800 $482,800 COM2010‐002 Tudor Enterprises, LLC ED05‐077.16‐02‐03.01 $41,300 $41,300 COM2010‐003 Tudor Enterprises, LLC ED05‐077.12‐01‐02.00 $6,508,500 $6,508,500 COM2010‐004 Outten, Stuart ED05‐077.09‐01‐94.00 $82,300 $57,600 COM2010‐005 Brazos Tax Group ED05‐068.09‐01‐01.00 $1,409,900 $1,409,900 COM2010‐006 Brazos Tax Group ED05‐076.07‐01‐30.01 $1,076,600 $1,076,600 COM2010‐007 UHS of Dover, LLC ED05‐078.00‐01‐08.00 $5,965,400 $5,965,400 Withdrew COM2010‐008 Engle, Richard ED05‐077.09‐01‐79.01 $134,600 $90,000 COM2010‐009 Engle, Richard ED05‐077.09‐01‐79.02 $134,600 $90,000 COM2010‐010 Records, George M ED05‐077.09‐01‐79.06 $134,600 $90,000 COM2010‐011 Records, George M ED05‐077.09‐01‐79.05 $134,600 $90,000 COM2010‐012 Torbert ED05‐077.14‐01‐19.04 $1,847,700 $1,800,000 COM2010‐013 Torbert ED05‐077.14‐01‐18.00 $461,300 deactivated

COM2010‐014 Torbert ED05‐077.14‐01‐20.00 $19,200 $19,200 COM2010‐018 Berks County Real Estate Associsatees ED05‐057.00‐01‐13.01‐001 $14,160,400 $10,713,200 Stipulated COM2010‐019 Berks County Real Estate Associsatees ED05‐057.00‐01‐13.01 $2,779,200 $2,779,200 Stipulated COM2010‐020 JC Penney Corporation Inc ED05‐057.00‐01‐14.03 $8,610,500 $7,671,200 Stipulated COM2010‐021 One Greentree Office Center LP ED05‐076.06‐06‐64.00 $3,590,700 $2,005,600 Stipulated COM2010‐022 Greentree Village Center LP ED05‐076.06‐06‐67.00 $6,367,400 $5,772,600 Stipulated COM2010‐023 Stevens/Anstine 1987‐1 LP ED05‐076.06‐06‐66.00 $4,004,900 $3,826,400 Stipulated COM2010‐024 Delaware Electric ED05‐077.09‐01‐49.00 $222,100 $118,400 Stipulated COM2010‐025 JWB Heritage‐DE LLC ED05‐077.09‐04‐34.00 $472,600 $472,600 COM2010‐026 Playtex Manufacturing Inc ED05‐077.06‐01‐02.00 $7,718,700 $6,185,500 COM2010‐027 Solomons Beacon Inn LP ED05‐057.01‐02‐10.01 $2,399,300 $2,399,300 Withdrew COM2010‐028 R S & J S Partnership ED05‐057.00‐01‐23.01 $2,055,600 $2,055,600 COM2010‐029 G&I VI Greens at Cedar Chase LLC ED05‐057.01‐02‐08.00 $11,116,800 $11,116,800 COM2010‐030 G & I Dover Country Club LLC ED05‐076.06‐06‐01.00 $13,176,500 $13,176,500 COM2010‐031 W. Leland & P. Diana Berry ED05‐067.15‐05‐32.00 $281,900 $143,100 Stipulated COM2010‐031a W. Leland & P. Diana Berry ED05‐067.15‐05.32.01 $281,900 $143,100 Stipulated COM2010‐032 Raynor, William ED05‐077.14‐01‐19.02 $445,000 $420,700 COM2010‐033 Collegian Plaza Hospitality Group II LLC ED05‐077.09‐04‐08.00 $184,800 $184,800 COM2010‐034 Compass Pointe LLC ED05‐067.12‐01‐08.00 $3,931,400 $3,931,400 COM2010‐035 Z‐Man Properties Inc ED05‐077.05‐01‐50.01 $853,900 $853,900 COM2010‐036 Zimmerman Michael & Connie ED05‐077.05‐04‐40.00 $1,543,000 $938,500 COM2010‐037 Dor‐Lee LLC ED05‐077.18‐01‐51.00 $1,468,000 $1,267,400 COM2010‐038 Harman Brothers LLC ED05‐077.05‐03‐23.00 $42,600 $42,600 COM2010‐039 Harman Oil Co ED05‐076.08‐04‐01.00 $72,000 $72,000 COM2010‐040 East Coast Woodcrest Arms LLC ED05‐067.11‐01‐02.00 $4,418,200 $4,418,200 COM2010‐041 East Coast Mapleton Square ED05‐068.19‐01‐24.00 $4,975,000 $4,975,000 COM2010‐042 East Coast Mapleton Square Apartment ED05‐068.14‐03‐63.00 $4,873,700 $4,873,700 COM2010‐043 East Coast Country Village LLC ED05‐077.11‐01‐04.00 $10,516,300 $9,500,000 COM2010‐044 East Coast Woodcrest Arms LLC ED05‐067.15‐04‐04.00 $1,662,100 $1,662,100 COM2010‐045 Robino‐Bay Court Plaza LLC ED05‐077.00‐01‐16.00 $17,291,300 $14,400,000 COM2010‐046 Estate of Malvin Gelof ED05‐077.18‐01‐48.00 $688,100 $525,000 COM2010‐047 Estate of Malvin Gelof ED05‐077.18‐01‐49.00 $2,335,200 $1,575,000 COM2010‐048 Creekstone Development LLC ED05‐086.05‐01‐12.00 $3,381,700 $2,924,400 Stipulated COM2010‐049 Woodbrook Development LLC ED05‐086.05‐01‐01.00 $4,027,400 $3,914,200 Stipulated COM2010‐050 Secure Storage LLC ED05‐077.00‐01‐25.00 $2,815,800 $2,086,700 Stipulated COM2010‐051 MDR & Son Inc ED05‐068.09‐01‐08.00 $1,107,800 $1,107,800 COM2010‐052 Wesley Realty Co. ED05‐078.13‐01‐18.00 $1,848,400 $1,130,200 Stipulated COM2010‐053 Conmal Properties LLC Ed05‐077.09‐04‐23.00 $5,500 $5,500 Withdrew

COM2010‐054 Conmal Properties LLC ED05‐077.09‐04‐24.00 $14,000 $14,000 Withdrew COM2010‐055 Conmal Properties LLC ED05‐077.09‐04‐21.00 $27,800 $27,800 Withdrew COM2010‐056 Conmal Properties LLC ED05‐077.09‐04‐18.00 $2,274,300 $2,274,300 Withdrew COM2010‐057 Kaufman, Robert & Nancy ED05‐076.08‐01‐26.01 $466,300 $466,300 COM2010‐058 Samay Hospitality LLC/Mukesh Patel ED05‐068.13‐01‐87.00 $3,141,500 $2,844,500 Stipulated COM2010‐059 Sams Real Estate Business Trust ED05‐057.00‐01‐05.02 $11,160,300 $10,212,800 Stipulated $181,243,300 $162,949,200 $18,294,100 Exemptions for Year 2010 Appeal # Name PIN # Exempt Amount E2010‐001 A&I Housing Inc. ED05‐068.18‐02‐74.00 $135,000 $0 E2010‐002 A&I Housing Inc. ED05‐076.08‐02‐63.00 $128,700 $0 E2010‐003 A&I Housing Inc. ED05‐068.18‐05‐41.00 $133,300 $0 E2010‐004 DIMA IX Inc. ED05‐077.06‐01‐67.00 $206,300 $0 E2010‐005 DIMA IX Inc. ED05‐076.10‐02‐03.01 $212,400 $0 E2010‐006 DIMA IX Inc. ED05‐067.14‐04‐23.00 $197,300 $0 E2010‐007 Village of Westover Homeowners Assoc Multiple Parcels $875,600 $0 E2010‐007B Westover LLC Multiple Parcels $931,400 $931,400 E2010‐007C Robino‐Sea Chase LLC Multiple Parcels $94,100 $94,100 E2010‐008 Pennsylvania Lines, LLC ED05‐076.08‐01‐43.00 $150,000 $0 E2010‐009 Pennsylvania Lines, LLC Ed05‐085.00‐01‐06.00 $729,000 $0 E2010‐010 First Pilgrim Baptist Church ED05‐068.14‐01‐14.00 $142,100 $142,100 E2010‐011 Persimmon Park Place LC05‐058.17‐03‐42.00 $318,500 $0 E2010‐012 YMCA ED05‐077.17‐05‐57.00 $245,000 $0 E2010‐013 YMCA ED05‐077.17‐05‐58.00 $322,000 $0 E2010‐014 Correctional Officers Association of DE ED05‐067.00‐02‐12.09 $691,600 $691,600 $5,512,300 $1,859,200 $3,653,100 Clerical Errors Name PIN # Tholstrup, Ralph & Alice ED05‐067.18‐03‐46.00 $190,600 $187,300 Reid, Debra L Ed05‐076.10‐02‐72.00 $141,900 $141,900 Westover LLC ED05‐076.00‐02‐03.00 $717,700 $0 Gross, Philip J & Tracey A ED05‐067.19‐02‐02.43 $186,100 $0 Del Homes Group ED05‐076.15‐01‐03.00 $10,710,800 $0 Teal Construction ED05‐076.08‐01‐05.00 $60,300 $3,100 RES2010‐039 Luther, Lucas Jr ED05‐077.18‐01‐20.00 $79,800 $59,900 $12,087,200 $392,200 $11,695,000 Abatement

Name PIN # Value A2010‐001 Ingerman Group (Capital Green Apart) multiple parcels $11,288,000 $0 11,288,000 $45,458,400

City Council=s Board of Assessment Appeals Tuesday June 01, 2010 The Board of Assessment Appeals was brought to order at 9:00 A.M. by City Assessor Cheryl Russell. Board Members present were: Jim Welsh, William T. Garfinkel and John Kelly III. Staff present was: City Assessor Cheryl Russell , Administrative Assistant Annette Hart and Paul Miller, Tyler Technologies. 1. Appeals A. Knopf Aaron Location: 1326 S Governor’s Ave. - ED05-085.12-01-39.01 Appealed Assessment: $482,800 Requested Assessment: $300,000 Mr. Knopf was present for the hearing. He explained that he did not get an appraisal because of the expense. He told the board that the State of Delaware Department of Transportation had purchased the front of the property due to the widening of Governor’s Ave. At that time the State purchased approximately 1,408 square feet of property, which means that the property is now smaller than at the time of the last Revaluation. He explained to the board that he was told by Tyler Technologies that the assessment of his property was based on the rent and that Tyler used a value of $7,000 per month. Mr. Knopf said that according to his tax statement the rent was only $53,000 for the year of 2009. In his opinion the new value came in much higher than it should have. Mr. Knopf told the board that he did not fill out the Income and Expense form, because in his opinion, the information requested was none of the City=s business. When asked how much Mr. Knopf would sell the property for, he explained to the board that he would not sell the property because it would not produce the income the property brings in by renting it out. The board discussed information provided and came to the conclusion that no compelling evidence was provided which would change the assessment. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to accept the Assessor=s Value, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 2-1.

B. Outten, Stewart Location: 219 W. North St. - ED05-077.09-01-94.00 Appealed Assessment: $82,300 Requested Assessment: $48,800 Before Mr. Outten was brought into the room, Ms. Russell explained to the board, that a clerical error had been found after the informal appeal which had not been corrected by Tyler Technologies. Mr. Russell made the necessary correction, which reduced the assessment from $82,300 to $57,600. The Assessor=s office did try to reach Mr. Outten to see if he would agree to this new value, but he did not return the call. Mr. and Mrs. Outten were present at the hearing. Ms. Russell explained to Mr. Outten that the value had dropped due to the clerical error. Mr. Outten believed the new value was still too high. He explained to the board, the two other properties he owned next to the appealed property had gone down in value after the Revaluation and thought that this property should have gone down in value as well. He believed that an error was made by Tyler Technologies when the value went up. Mr. Miller explained to the board that if Tyler Technologies would have thought that the lot in question would have been a buildable lot, the value would have been higher. Mr. Kelly made the motion to accept the new value of $57,600 which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. C. Brazos Tax Group The appellant was not present for the hearing and was called to find out if someone was on the way to the meeting at which time the appellant said that nobody would be coming to the meeting due to scheduling conflicts. The board went on to discuss the properties based on the evidence provided. Mr. Miller explained to the board that the properties are located on the main road going through the City. In Mr. Miller’s opinion, no evidence was provided that would warrant lowering the assessment. Mr. Welsh made the motion to keep the assessment as is for both of the properties. Which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel, who also wanted to let the record show that the owners were not present for the meeting and that no compelling evidence was provided by the owner to make any changes to the value. Motion carried 3-0.

1. Location 758 N DuPont Hwy - ED05-068.09-01-01.00 Appealed Assessment: $1,409,900 Requested Assessment: $1,144,600 2. Location 1035 Forrest Ave. - ED05-076.07-01-30.01 Appealed Assessment: $1,076,600 Requested Assessment: $1,019,500 D. UHS of Dover LLC Location: 725 Horsepond Rd. - ED05-078.00-01-08.00 Appealed Assessment: $5,965,400 Requested Assessment$4,784,646 Ms. Russell told the board that the owner had asked for a withdrawal form, but has not returned the form back to the office as of yet. No one was present for the hearing. The board went on to discuss the information provided. Mr. Miller explained to the board how Tyler Technologies came up with the value for the property and that no information was provided by the petitioner that warranted the assessment to be lowered. Mr. Kelly made the motion to accept the assessed value, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. E. Playtex Manufacturing Inc. Location: 50 N. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-077.06-01-02.00 Appealed Assessment: $7,718,700 Requested Assessment: $4,612,200 Mr. Konrad, Facility Manager for Playtex, was present for the hearing. He explained to the board that the appealed building is empty and has been empty for some time. He also told the board that the building is for sale and has had no buyers until recently. Mr. Konrad went on to tell the board that a marketing study by C. B. Richard Ellis in January of 2010, which was an estimate for sale price for a quick 6 month marketing period of $3.2 - $4 Million dollars and a normal 12 month marketing period for $4 -$5.5 Million. When asked what and where the property was

listed for, he was not able to give the board an answer. Mr. Konrad told the board that there is asbestos present in the building which would have to be removed. Mr. Miller explained that Tyler Technologies had already taken the asbestos into consideration which would bring the value down to $6,185,500 not changing the land value. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to amend the value of the building to $2,418,000 which would be a total value of $6,185,500, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. F. Berry, Leland & Diane (Stipulation) Ms. Russell explained to the board that based on information Mr. Berry provided the values of the properties were changed to the stipulated values. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to accept the stipulated values, which was seconded by Mr. Kelly. Motion carried 3-0. 1. Location: 753 Walker Road - ED05-067.15-05-32.01 Appealed Assessment: $281,900 Requested Assessment: $7,892 Stipulated Assessment: $143,100 2. Location: 755 Walker Road - ED05-067.15-05-32.00 Appealed Assessment: $281,900 Requested Assessment: $7,892.50 Stipulated Assessment: $143,100 G. Raynor, William Location: 620 S. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-077.14-01-19.02 Appealed Assessment: $445,000 Requested Assessment: $351,000 Mr. Raynor was present for the hearing. He explained that the $100,000 increase in value was too much for a coin operated car-wash. He told the board that business had declined, as people do not see the need to spend money to wash their cars right now. Mr. Raynor expressed his concern regarding the taxes, the increase in electric, the business license and so on. He said that he will be working for nothing to keep up with all of the added expenses. After Mr. Raynor left, the board went on to discuss the information provided. Mr. Miller pointed out that the car wash is graded as a AB@, which could be changed to a AC A depending on the condition of the car-wash. Mr. Garfinkel agreed that the car-wash in question is a normal, nothing out of the ordinary, kind of car-wash. It was decided by the board to change the grade to a AC@, which brought the value down to $420,700. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to accept the modified amount of $420,700, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. Adjournment

City Council=s Board of Assessment Appeals Wednesday June 02, 2010 The Board of Assessment Appeals was brought to order at 9:00 A.M. by City Assessor Cheryl Russell. Board Members present were: Jim Welsh, William T. Garfinkel and Todd Stonesifer. Staff present was : City Assessor Cheryl Russell , Administrative Assistant Annette Hart and Paul Miller, Tyler Technologies. 1.Appeals Mr. Records was present at the hearing on Mr. Engle=s behalf as well as for his properties. The board decided to discuss and treat the 4 units the same, as they are in the same building. Mr. Records explained to the board that during the Revaluation the parcels below went from one parcel to two with a value of $134,600 each. Mr. Records ran an income approach on the 2 units based on gross- income and capital expenses and came up with a number of $117,000-$130,000 for the total building. After some discussion Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to reduce the Assessment to $90,000 per unit, totaling $180,000, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. A. Engle, Richard 1. Location: 371W. North St. - ED05-077.09-01-79.01 Appealed Assessment: $134,600 Requested Assessment: $65,000 Board Decision: $90,000 Engle, Richard 2. Location: 371 W North St. - ED05-077.09-01-79.02 Appealed Assessment: $134,600 Requested Assessment: $65,000 Board Decision: $90,000

B. Records, George Jr. 1. Location: 375 W North St. -ED05-077.09-01-79.06 Appealed Assessment: $134,600 Requested Assessment: $65,000 Board Decision: $90,000 Records, George Jr. 2. Location: 375 W North St. - ED05-077.09-01-79.05 Appealed Assessment: $134,600 Requested Assessment: $65,000 Board Decision: $90,000 C. JWB Heritage DE LLC Location: 207 S Governors Ave. - ED05-077.09-04-34.00 Appealed Assessment: $472,600 Requested Assessment: $140,900 Mr. Baxter, Mr. Wilcox and Mr. Records were present for the hearing. Mr. Records supplied the board with a picture of the property. He told the board that the property is an old garage with 4 bays and a small retail space as well as an office. He explained to the board that the company pays rent to themselves as the business is family owned. Mr. Wilcox wanted to make it clear to the board, that Mr. Baxter did not appeal the taxes of his property, but filed an appeal because he thought his property was valued to high. Mr. Records explained that business had been slowed tremendously do to the road construction on Governor’s Ave. According to Mr. Baxter the company lost $68,000 in revenue in 2008. Part of this was the road construction as well as renovations the company made. D. Torbert, William 1. Location: S. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-077.14-01-19.04 Appealed Assessment: $1,847,700 Requested Assessment: $134,480 Mr. Records was present on Mr. Torbert=s behalf. He pointed out to the board that the land size the city has is incorrect. Mr. Records explained that the properties are not serviced by the City of

Dover with sewer. Mr. Records points out that the City has these parcels split into two parcels and the County has them as one, which is how it is recorded by the Recorder of Deeds. Mr. Records told the board that the construction of the building is cheap and the construction is in fair condition. There are three (3) tenants in this building. He explained that the rents have been very low due to the location of the buildings. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion based on parcel ED05-077.14-01-19.04 and ED05-077.14-01-18.00 be combined as stated in the deed, to change the assessed value to $1,800,000, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. 2. Location: 666 S DuPont Hwy.- ED05-077.14-01-18.00 Appealed Assessment: $461,300 Requested Assessment: $221,700 The mini-storage is rented to an LLC who rents the units out themselves. Mr Miller asked if there is a relationship between Mr. Torbert and the LLC, which Mr. Records said there is. 3. Location: ED05-077.14-01-20.00 - ED05-077.14-01-20.00 Appealed Assessment: $19,200 Requested Assessment: $ 3,500 Mr. Records had not been instructed by Mr. Torbert to talk about this property and was not present for the hearing. Mr. Torbert was contacted by phone to make sure that he would be there for the hearing. He confirmed that he was in Florida and would not be present for the hearing. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to accept the Assessor=s value, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. E. Dor-Lee LLC Location: 1062 S. DuPont Hwy - ED05-077.18-01-51.00 Appealed Assessment: $1,486,000 Requested Assessment: $1,130,000 Mr. Hansen and Mr. Darrell were present at the hearing. Mr. Darrell told the board that the new assessment is too high. He explained that the numbers such as the rent the city used were too high and the expenses were not right. He pointed to the comparables he used, which were properties next door. Mr. Darrell went over the appraisal he submitted.

After the appellant left the room the Board discussed the information provided. Ms. Russell pointed out that in the Income and Expense form provided, the taxes were added in, which is incorrect. She explained that once the taxes are taken out and the cap-rate provided in the appraisal is used to calculate, the value would come to $1,267,400.The board agreed that this would be the fair way to value the property. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to change the value to $1,267,400, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. F. MDR & Son Inc. Location: 705 N DuPont Hwy - ED05-068.09-01-08.00 Appealed Assessment: $1,107,800 Requested Assessment: $583,520 The property owner Mr. Ruffin was present for the hearing. He explained to the board that the owner of the business (Arby=s) , who is renting the property, met with him to ask if he could help out by lowering the rent as the business was not making the profit it had been in the past. When Mr. Ruffin declined helping the owner, as he had already done in the past, he was told by the business owner that he would not be able to renew the rental agreement. Mr. Ruffin handed out copies of a letter from his accountant, in which the accountant explained the calculation of rent and that based on these calculations the property should be valued at $642,949. Mr. Ruffin explained that his reason for meeting with the board, is that the property will be vacant soon and that in his opinion the property should be valued less. The board discussed the information given by the appellant. They agreed, that even though Arby=s is losing money because their menu is too expensive and even though they added the dollar menu to compete with McDonalds, it did not work for them. The board also agreed that the property could be rented out to another franchise, which could come in and remodel the existing building. They realized that McDonalds, Burger King, Popeye’s Chicken as well as Kentucky Fried Chicken are located just a few blocks down the road. Mr. Stonesifer suggested to get the assessed values for McDonalds, Popeye’s Chicken, Kentucky Fried Chicken and Burger King. The board agreed to table the matter so the Assessor has time to get the assessment values for the other franchise=s mentioned.

G. Wesley Realty (Stipulation) Location: 883 Horsepond Rd. - ED05-078.13-01-18.00 Appealed Assessment: $1,848,400 Stipulated Value: $1,130,200 Ms. Russell explained to the board that after talking to the owner the office realized that there were some issues with the land value. After the necessary changes were made the value changed from $1,848,400 to $1,130,200 which is what the property owner stipulated to. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to accept the stipulated value, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. H. Adjournment

City Council=s Board of Assessment Appeals Thursday June 03, 2010 The Board of Assessment Appeals was brought to order at 9:00 A.M. by City Assessor Cheryl Russell. Board Members present were: Jim Welsh, William T. Garfinkel and Todd Stoneseifer. Staff present was: City Assessor Cheryl Russell, Administrative Assistant Annette Hart and Paul Miller, Tyler Technologies. Appeals MDR & Son Inc.(tabled from June 02, 2010) Location: 705 N DuPont Hwy - ED05-068.09-01-08.00 Appealed Assessment: $1,107,800 Requested Assessment: $583,520 Ms. Russell asked to board to revisit the property which was tabled from the day before. The board had asked the Assessor=s Office to print property record cards for Burger King, Popeye=s Chicken, KFC and McDonald=s to be able to compare them to the appealed property. Mr. Miller explained to the board that the properties’ assessments are comparable with the appealed property, which they agreed to. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to keep the assessment as is, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. A. Harman Brothers LLC Location: 2 S. Governor’s Ave. - ED05-077.05-03-23.00 Original Value: $42,600 Requested Value: $25,000 Mr. Harman was present for the hearing and explained to the board, that the property had been in his family for a very long time. He told the board that the building is over 100 years old and built to the property lines and that no rent is charged. He also told the board that he was not able to find any comparable properties for the appealed property. In his opinion there is no future for the property as there is no parking. Mr. Harman told the board that he was told by City Officials, that if the building would burn down for whatever reason, he would be allowed to rebuild. When asked what value Mr. Harman would put on the property he replied that he would value the property at $25,000. He did explain that he would not be able to sell the property. Mr. Garfinkel asked how the restaurant=s business was; Mr. Harman was not sure, since he does not visit the area or the restaurant.

Mr. Stonesifer told the board that he is somewhat familiar with the property and its location, he know of 2 properties adjacent to the appealed property, which were purchased with the purpose to build a corner market to service college students. Unfortunately the owner had decided not to go forward due to un-foreseen circumstances. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to recommend no change in value, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. B. Harman Oil Co. Location: 517 W. Division St. - ED05-076.08-04-01.00 Original Value: $72,000 Requested Value: $50,000 Mr. Harman was present for the hearing and explained to the board that the property was originally part of a petroleum storage facility and had above ground tanks up until approximately 25 years ago. He believed that the property had limited commercial value because of its size and that it would be hard to sell. He also believed that the property was located in an unsafe neighborhood. Mr. Harman told the board that he was not able to find comparable properties for the appealed property. The board came to the conclusion that the appellant did not provide any information which would give reason to change the assessment. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to keep the value as is, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. C. Tudor Enterprises LLC Mr. Tudor and his assistant Ms. Shufelt were present for the hearing. He told the board that the property was an unusual situation, which was purchased in 1975. He met with the assessor at that time and showed him the plans for the purchased property and was told that the property was located on a state maintained road. He was given a choice to either have an acceptance by the City or stay out of the City. By choosing to stay out of the City, he had to take care of the streets by himself. He had to provide a sewer line to a location shown by the City. That fell apart and Mr. Tudor was told to extend the sewer line by1500 feet to another location from where he could hook up to a line into the City. He was given a letter by the City, which said that the City would be responsible for the station. Mr. Tudor explained that every time something went wrong with this station he had to fix it. He told the board that he has no police protection by the City, no snow removal etc. He explained that he does the entire street resurfacing himself. In Mr. Tudor=s opinion the board should reconsider the assessment based on the information given. With regards to the property on Lafferty Lane, he told the board that the State had purchased some of the land to build Route 1, which land-locked this piece of property. He told the board that he bought the property on Lafferty Lane for approximately $14,000.

Mr. Tudor did meet with Tyler Technologies at which time the value was dropped from $14,000,000 to $6,508,500. Mr. Tudor explained that he did have an appraisal done by Dover Consulting Services in 2009. Mr. Miller pointed out that the appraisal provided was created for Estate Purposes only and was not to be used for anything else. In his opinion the Estate Appraisal is not as aggressive as the market would be. Mr. Miller explained that he read the informal notes and saw that the adjustment had been made based on the rent information Mr. Tudor provided at the informal hearing. Mr. Tudor was concerned that the assessment company used values from New York or New Jersey and was assured by Mr. Miller that his people were trained to look only at values in the area they are doing the revaluation in. Mr. Tudor expressed his concern that he would not be able to sell his property for the assessed value. Mr. Miller told Mr. Tudor that the purpose of the revaluation was to capture the true value of the property. After Mr. Tudor left the board discussed the information provided. The board agreed that the property is very much like a mall, where the mall is responsible for the clearing and up-keeping of the roads, as they are not dedicated roads, very much like the roads in the Tudor Business park. The board agreed that Tyler Technologies did take the appraisal provided by Mr. Tudor into consideration and therefore made the change in value from $13,970,000 to $6,508,500. Mr. Welsh made the motion to accept the assessed value of $6,508,500 for parcel ED05-077.12-01-02.00, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. The board wanted to make sure that the vacant land is treated uniform with all other parcel=s in the City and Mr. Miller assured the board that these two properties had been revisited and were treated fairly. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to accept the assessed value of $41,300 for parcel ED05-077.16-02-03.01, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 2-1. Location: Lafferty Ln. - ED05-077.16-02-03.01 Original Value: $41,300 Requested Value: Location: 521 Otis Dr. - ED05-077.12-01-02.00 Original Value$6,508,500 Requested Value:

D. Delaware Electric Signal (Stipulation) Location: 145 S. New St. - ED05-077.09-01-49.00 Original Value: $222,100 Requested Value: $115,000 Stipulated Value: $118,400 Ms. Russell explained that when she reviewed the property record card, she noticed a discrepancy which, once corrected, brought the value down to the stipulated amount. The property owner agreed with the new value. Mr. Welsh made the motion to accept the stipulation which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. E. East Coast Woodcrest Arms LLC Location: Woodcrest Drive - ED05-067.11-01-02.00 Original Value: $4,418,200 Requested Value: $3,091,400 The board discussed the information requested and recommended no change. Mr. Stoneseifer made the motion not to change the original value, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. F. East Coast Mapleton Square Location: White Oak Road - ED05-068.19-01-24.00 Original Value: $4,975,000 Requested Value: $3,687,500 The board discussed the information requested and recommended no change. Mr. Stoneseifer made the motion not to change the original value, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. G. East Coast Mapleton Square Apartments LLC Location: Willis Road - ED05-068.14-03-63.00 Original Value: $4,873,700 Requested Value: $3,612,500

The board discussed the information requested and recommended no change. Mr. Stoneseifer made the motion not to change the original value, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. H. East Coast Woodcrest Arms LLC Location: Woodcrest Dr. - ED05-067.15-04-04.00 Original Value: $1,662,100 Requested Value: $1,208,600 The board discussed the information requested and recommended no change. Mr. Stoneseifer made the motion not to change the original value, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. I. East Coast Country Village LLC Location: Little Creek Road - ED05-077.11-01-04.00 Original Value: $10,516,300 Requested Value: $6,000,000 The board discussed the information requested and recommended no change. Mr. Welsh made the motion to lower the value of parcel ED05-077.11-01-04.00 from $10,516,300 to $9,500,000, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. Mr. Morgan was present for the hearing; he had prepared a summary for each of the appealed Properties, which he explained to the board at this time. The summary consisted of: $ 2009 Actual Result=s compared to Commercial Property Assessment Cards $ Property Comparison: 2009 Actual Result=s $ Property Comparison: 2009 Actual Result - Services $ Property Comparison: 2009 Actual Result - Net Utility Expense $ Property Comparison: 2009 Actual Result - Repairs and Maintenance $ Unit Mix $ Rent Rolls as of December 31, 2009 After Mr. Morgan left the board went over the information provided. The board looked at the different comparison=s provided by the appellant and made the following motion=s:

Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to keep the assessed value for the parcels, ED05-068.14-03-63.00 at $4,873,700, ED05-067.15-04-04.00 at 1,662,100 and the value for ED05-067.15-04-24.00 at $4,497,000 which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. Mr. Welsh made the motion to lower the value of parcel ED05-077.11-01-04.00 from $10,516,300 to $9,500,000, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to keep the value for ED05-067.15-04-04.00 at $1,662,100, Mr. Welsh seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. Adjournment

City Council=s Board of Assessment Appeals Thursday June 07, 2010 The Board of Assessment Appeals was brought to order at 9:00 A.M. by City Assessor Cheryl Russell. Board Members present were: Jim Welsh, William T. Garfinkel and Jim Galvin. Staff present was : City Assessor Cheryl Russell , Administrative Assistant Annette Hart and Paul Miller, Tyler Technologies. Appeals A. Kaufman, Robert & Nancy Location: 40 Ridgely St. - ED05-076.08-01-26.01 Original Value: $466,300 Requested Value: Mr. Phil McGinnis represented Mr. And Mrs. Kaufman at the hearing. He explained that he did an income approach for the property with operating expenses, which come up with a value of $400,000. He told the board that the property has been on the market for approximately 2 years. It is listed for $3.75 per square foot. One of the buildings is going to be rented and will be used as a limo-repair business. After Mr. McGinnis left, the board discussed the information provided. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to accept the Assessor=s value, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. B. Samay Hospitality LLC (Stipulation) Location: 272 N DuPont Hwy. - ED05-068.13-01-87.00 Original Value: $3,141,500 Requested Value: $2,700,000 Stipulated Value: $2,844,500 Ms. Russell explained to the board that the appellant stipulated to $2,844,500. Mr. Miller told the board that Tyler Technologies took another look at the value and made some adjustments, which brought the value down to the stipulated value.

Mr. Welsh made the motion to accept the stipulated value, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. C. Berks County Real Estate Associates Location: 1365 B N. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-057.00-01-13.01-001 Original Value: $14,160,400 Requested Value: $8,200,000 Agreed Value: $10,713,200 Location: 1365 N. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-57.00-01-13.00 Original Value: $2,779,200 Requested Value: $100,000 Agreed Value: $2,779,200 Ms. Russell explained to the board that the appellant had agreed to the following values via phone conversation and asked the board to vote on those values. Parcel: ED05-057.00-01-13.01-001 agreed value $10,713,200 Parcel: ED05-057.00-01-13.00. agreed value $2,779,200 Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to accept the agreed values, which was seconded by Mr. Galvin, Motion carried 3-0. D. J C Penney Corporation Inc. (Stipulation) Location: 1365 N. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-057.00-01-14.03 Original Value: $8,610,500 Requested Value: $4,550,000 Stipulated Value: $7,671,200 Mr. Miller told the board that Tyler Technologies changed the cap-rate which brought the value down. Mr. Galvin made the motion to accept the stipulated value, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0.

E. Solomons Beacon Inn LP - Withdrawal Location: 1654 N. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-057.01-02-10.01 Original Value: $2,399,300 Requested Value: $1,144,200 Ms. Russell asked the board to accept the withdrawal by Solomons Beacon Inn LP. Mr. Welsh made the motion to accept the withdrawal, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel Motion carried 3-0. F. R S & J S Partnership Location: 1225 N. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-057.00-01-23.01 Original Value: $2,055,600 Requested Value: $1,000,000 John Stant was present for the hearing. He told the board that he did meet informally with Tyler Technologies at which time the assessment had been dropped. He explained to the board that in his opinion he is assessed to high, especially after talking to the owner of the business next to him, which is valued lower. Mr. Miller explained to the appellant that the business right next to him is a completely different business which would be valued differently. Mr. Miller explained that the property is valued right in line with other restaurants in the area. After some discussion about the information provided Mr. Galvin made the motion to keep the value as is, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0.

G. G & I VI Greens at Cedar Chase Location: 100 N. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-07.01-02-08.00 Original Value: $11,116,800 Requested Value: $10,711,000 Mr. Brown was at the hearing to represent the appellant. He explained to the board that based on the calculations he did, the value of the property should come in at the requested value. Mr. Miller pointed out that the property had been purchased in March of 2008 for $13,786,336 which is higher than the assessed value. Mr. Miller, as well as the board, went over the information provided and asked questions. Mr. Brown told the board that he met with Tyler Technologies for the informal appeal, at which time the assessment was lowered. After the appellant left, the board reviewed the information provided. Mr. Galvin made the motion to keep the assessed value of $11,116,800, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0. G & I Dover Country Club LLC Location: Forrest Ave - ED05-076.06-06-01.00 Original Value: $13,176,500 Requested Value: $11,792,000 Mr. Brown was at the hearing to represent the appellant. Mr. Miller pointed out the property had been sold in March of 2008 for $17,622,609, which is higher than the assessed value. Mr. Brown told the board that he met with Tyler Technologies for the informal appeal, at which time the assessment was lowered. After the appellant left, the board reviewed the information provided. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to keep the assessed value of $13,176,500, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. Adjournment

City Council=s Board of Assessment Appeals Wednesday June 09, 2010 The Board of Assessment Appeals was brought to order at 9:00 A.M. by City Assessor Cheryl Russell. Board Members present were: Jim Welsh, William T. Garfinkel and Tom Burns. Staff present was : City Assessor Cheryl Russell , Administrative Assistant Annette Hart and Paul Miller, Tyler Technologies. Stipulation A. Robino-Bay Court Plaza LLC Location: 650 Bay Road - ED05-077.00-01-16.00 Original Value: $17,291,300 Requested Value: $12,700,000 Stipulated Value: $14,400,000 Ms. Russell explained to the board that this property stipulated to a value. Mr. Miller told the board that when Tyler Technologies reviewed the appraisal supplied by Robino-Bay Court Plaza, they realized that the numbers provided in the appraisal were higher than the income and expense numbers provided, but lower than the revaluation value, therefore Mr. Miller made the suggestion to make an offer to the appellant with the number provided in the appraisal, which was $14,400,000. The appellant stipulated to that number. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to accept the stipulated value, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. Withdrawal Conmal Properties LLC 1. 103 W. North St. 2. 107 W. North St. 3. 220 S. State St. 4. 6 W. Loockerman St. Ms. Russell asked the board to accept the withdrawal by Conmal Properties LLC. Mr. Welsh made the motion to accept the withdrawal which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0.

Stipulation Sams Real Estate Business Trust Location: 1572 N. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-057.00-01-05.02 Original Value: $11,160,300 Requested Value: $10,000,000 Stipulated Value: $10,212,800 Mr. Miller explained to the board that he and the Assessor had been negotiating with Sam=s and agreed to a stipulated value of $10,212,800. Mr. Burns made the motion to except the stipulated value of $10,212,800, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. Appeals B. Estate of Melvin Gelof 1. 1030 S. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-077.18-01-48.00 Original Value: $688,100 Requested Value: $525,000 2. 1032 S. DuPont Hwy. - ED05-077.18-01-49.00 Original Value: $2,335,200 Requested Value: $1,575,000 Mr. Rodriguez and Mrs. Gelof were present for the hearing. Mrs. Gelof explained that they had an appraisal done which reflected a total amount of $2,100,000 for both properties. She explained to the board that the property is in need of repairs before it can be sold. She requested a total value of $1,800,000 for both of the properties, because of the repairs needed. Mr. Rodriguez told the board that the property has been for sale now for 2 years for $2.6 million. The roof of the building needs to be completely replaced as well as raised, based on City Code, which will cost approximately $80,000. He also told the board that they are estimating the cost of the Sprinkler System to be approximately $50,000. The duct-work needs to be updated, as well as the parking lot needs to be fixed as well as the sign needs to be replaced for a total repair cost of $400,000 - $500,000. He also told the board that the second floor has asbestos tile which will need to be removed. There have been no tenants upstairs because the ceiling is too low and not up to code. Mr. Rodriguez also explained that they are required to install an elevator for access for the upstairs by the City of Dover Fire Chief. Mr. Miller told the board that an offer to reduce the total value to $2,550,200 had been made to the

appellant before the hearing but was declined. After some discussion about the information provided, Mr. Burns made the motion the assessment be adjusted to a total value of $2.1 million for both parcels, with a break down between tax parcel ending in 49 be a value of $1,575,000 and parcel ending in 48 be $525,000. Mr. Welsh seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. D. Collegian Plaza Hospitality Group II LLC Location: 116 W. Loockerman St. - ED05-077.09-04-08.00 Original Value: $184,800 Requested Value: $62,200 Mr. Rodriguez and Ms. Wyatt were present for the hearing. Mr. Rodriguez pointed out that the parcel next to the appealed property was assessed at $198,700. He did admit that the appealed property is slightly larger, but believed that the value of the appealed property should not be higher. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to accept the assessor’s assessment, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. E. Compass Pointe LLC Location: 800 N. State St. - ED05-067.12-01-08.00 Original Value: $3,931,400 Requested Value: $2,163,300 Mr. Rodriguez and Ms. Wyatt were present for the hearing. Mr Rodriguez told the board that the appellant just received an offer for $3,000,000. The building has about 8,000 square feet per floor. Mr. Miller pointed out that there are permits with cost of $3,127,000 for the construction of the building. Mr. Miller did state that Tyler Technologies did take into consideration the fact that the building is not completely finished. Mr. Welsh made the motion to accept the assessor=s value, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0.

F. Z-Man Properties Inc. Location: 29 N. State St. - ED05-077.05-01-50.01 Original Value: $853,900 Requested Vale:$499,600 Mr. Rodriguez and Ms. Wyatt were present for the hearing. Mr. Miller asked if Mr. Rodriguez knew what the property is listed as, he responded that the property is for sale for $1,300,000. Mr. Rodriguez provided the board with a list of comparable properties, which have been assessed lower than the said property. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to accept the Assessor=s value, which was seconded Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. G. Zimmerman, Michael & Connie Location: 144 Kings Hwy. - ED05-077.05-04-40.00 Original Value: $1,154,300 Requested Value: $446,100 Mr. Rodriguez and Ms. Wyatt were present for the hearing. Ms. Wyatt told the board that the building was geared for office space but was vacant at this time. Mr. Miller pointed out that the property was listed for $1,700,000. Mr. Miller pointed out to the board that an offer to reduce the assessed value to $938,500 had been made prior to the hearing but had not been accepted. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to accept the revised value of $938,500, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0. Adjournment

CITY MANAGER’S MONTHLY REPORT June 2010 City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010

City Manager Citizen Action Center page has been updated to reflect Community Outreach, Training & Education activi‐ ties. Customer Services 1,297 payments were processed online or by telephone in June 2010. City of Dover property taxes were due August 31, 2009. As of June 30, 2010 the delinquent property taxes total $226,046.75. Our collection efforts include sending a delinquent statements, making phone calls, and enforcing the Clean Hands Act. The Planning and Inspections Departments have been providing assis‐ tance in collecting these outstanding debts. Budget and Program Development Participated in the IUE‐CWA contract negotiations. Human Resources Continued contract negotiations with labor unions (IUE‐CWA and IBEW). Interviews for open Utility Maintenance Mechanic II position were conducted. Information Technology Responses received from the RFP for Web Services were reviewed and meetings have been schedule with the top picks. Parks, Recreation, & Library The Library recorded 683 people attending 20 children’s programs. “In Harmony” concerts recorded 219 attendees. Concerts on the Green have hosted more than 900 spectators for the month of June. Construction has begun on the Schutte Park storage addition. Public Services Met with state officials regarding improvements to the Silver Lake Dam. Completed the bid evaluation for the Fiscal 2010‐2011 Street Program. Public Utilities Fox Hall Force Main Reroute has been completed. 2 City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010

CITIZEN ACTION CENTER Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Citizen Action Center 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 Number of Frequently Asked Questions 495 521 304 253 314 249 222 309 263 252 186 Citizens view answers to some of the most asked questions. Having this information available online it allows citizens to access the information regardless of the time; day or night. Average Time to Close Planning and Inspections: Property Code Violations—5.8 days Police: Community Policing— 7.4 days Public Services: 40.1 days Public Utilities: 0.77 days Site Admin/Other: General Inquires — 0.67 days Community Outreach, Training and Education for June 2010 Delmarva Chicken Festival African American Festival Fire Safety Education Day @ Lowes Dover Sun Park Signing Ceremony Library Public Relations Committee Meeting Woodcrest Fire – Shelter Set Up and Victim Assistance City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010 3

CENTRAL SERVICES Fleet Operations & Maintenance Items on Hand with no Usage over 36 Months 80000 120 $1,000,000 70000 100 Total Work Orders 60000 $800,000 Total Dollars 80 50000 40000 60 $600,000 30000 40 20000 $400,000 20 10000 0 0 $200,000 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay Jun Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Total Dollars Tot al Work Orders Elect ric Wat er General Work Orders: 93 Electric: $425,199.98 Fleet Maintenance: $17,963.68 (excludes Melvin’s Sunoco) Water: $ 25,725.40 Fuel: $42,601.66 (19,665 gallons) General: $ 39,640.51 Stock Purchases by Fund Contingency & Warehouse Stock $500,000 $4,500,000 2,700 2,600 $400,000 $4,000,000 2,500 Total Line Items 2,400 $300,000 $3,500,000 2,300 Total Dollars 2,200 $200,000 $3,000,000 2,100 2,000 $100,000 $2,500,000 1,900 1,800 $2,000,000 1,700 $0 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay Jun Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- M ar- Apr- M ay- Jun- 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Elect ric Wat er General Total Dollar Value Total Line It ems Electric: $96,081.03 Total Dollar Value: $2,548,823.31 Water: $ 5,045.11 Total Line Items: 1,815 General: $ 9,398.00 Major Program Updates MEASURE JUNE 2010 JUNE 2009 DIFFERENCE Issue Effectiveness (>90%) How often the warehouse has what cus‐ 97.4% 100% ‐2.6% tomers need when it’s needed. [issues / (issues + back orders)] * 100 Turn Over Rate (4‐5 per yr.) Indicates that the material stocked is the 1 every 5.63 years 1 every 6.32 years ‐0.69 years material being used. Bids for non‐inventory items converted to 7 of 7 Bids 31 of 36 Bids purchase orders within timeframe 14% 100% FYTD 86% (FY09 Total) (Quantity and Percentage) Sealed bids prepared, received & distrib‐ 36 of 38 Bids 41 of 43 Bids uted within 7 working days of receipt ‐0.6% 94.7% FYTD 95.3% (FY09 Total) (Quantity and Percentage) Scheduled Preventative Maintenance 37 of 39 appointments kept 18 of 39 appointments kept appointments being kept. 48.7% 94.8% 46.1% (Quantity and Percentage) Mail receiving lowest discounted rate 364,308 pieces 391,099 pieces ‐0.82% (Quantity and Percentage) 96.3% as of May 2010 97.1% (FY09 Total) Routine work orders completed within 5 23 work orders completed 32 work orders completed 2.01% days (Quantity and Percentage) 92.8`% 91.4% Emergency work orders completed within 2 work orders completed 5 work order completed ‐ 2 days (Quantity and Percentage) 100% 100% 4 City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010

CUSTOMER SERVICES WORK ORDERS PROCESSED EXTENSIONS OF CREDIT 3,500 738 800 698 714 3,000 700 621 613 628 568 2,262 600 542 556 547 556 1,984 2,500 468 1,803 1,875 1,848 1,841 1,833 1,737 1,709 500 1,526 2,000 356 1,382 1,355 1,399 400 1,500 300 1,000 200 500 100 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 Write‐Offs / Electric & Trash Bills The electric write‐off for outstanding electric bills with dates ranging mainly from April 2008 until June 2008 . The proposed write‐off of $34,940.63 includes $109.00 from accounts that filed for bankruptcy. The $34,940.63 is the fourth write‐off for Fiscal 2010 and is .15 percent of the revenue ($23,096,594) for the write‐off period. In other words, the City collected 99.85% of all bills for the write‐off period. For every $100 dollars of revenue the City billed in the write‐off period, $0.15 was not collected. The trash write‐off for outstanding trash bills with dates ranging mainly from April 2008 until June 2008. The proposed write‐ off of $704.39 includes $1.37 from accounts that filed bankruptcy. The $704.39 is the fourth write‐off for Fiscal 2010 and is $0.24 percent of the revenue ($291,469) for the write‐off period. In other words, the City collected 99.76% of all bills for the write‐off period. For every $100 of revenue the City billed in the write‐off period, $0.24 was not collected. According to the APPA, the industry standard for collections among publicly held utilities of similare size is 99.74% of total electric revenue. The accounts are currently assisgned to our collection agency and will remain there even when they have been written off. A complete list of accounts is available upon request. FY 2010 FY 2009 Major Program Updates Jun 2010 Jun 2009 Difference Year‐to‐Date Year‐to‐Date Number of Customers Served 22,519 23,299 (780) 284,103 304,080 Final Bills 902 737 165 7,705 8,404 Estimated Bills 157 139 18 1,725 1,834 Penalties Posted $ 15,919 $ 16,864 $ (946) $ 216,565 $ 211,202 Extensions of Credit ‐ Amount Extended $ 144,444 $ 23,150 $ 121,293 $ 1,856,639 $ 1,903,270 Balance Transfers $ 6,625 $ 3,608 $ 3,017 $ 119,625 $ 136,801 Utility Collections $ 31,741 $ 31,540 $ 201 $ 327,783 $ 519,454 Special Assessments $ 365 $ 190 $ 175 $ 34,571 $ 4,496 Miscellaneous Billings $ 176,182 $ 151,374 $ 24,808 $ 1,513,980 $ 881,178 CNP through Disconnect Collars 9 29 (20) 128 315 Court Cases ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Tamperings 3 4 (1) 38 55 Taxes Levied $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 9,821,008 $ 9,658,692 Billing Adjustments $ 28,731 $ ‐ $ 28,731 $ 121,638 $ (4,311) Total Taxes Collected $ 77,674 $ 37,393 $ 40,282 $ 9,626,526 $ 9,184,419 Taxes Outstanding $ 245,810 $ 243,037 $ 2,772 $ 243,037 $ 7,294,624 Payments in Lieu $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ ‐ $ 18,000 $ 62,802 Billing Accuracy (on schedule billings) 99.0% 99.0% ‐ 99.0% 99.0% Bills Published on Schedule 99.9% 99.9% ‐ 99.9% 99.9% Meters Read on Schedule 99.9% 99.9% ‐ 99.9% 99.9% Customer Satisfaction Rating 99.7% 99.7% ‐ 99.7% 99.7% Deliquent Accounts Collected 99.7% 99.7% ‐ 99.8% 99.8% City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010 5

HUMAN RESOURCES Customer Service Contacts Payroll Hours 700 9,000 600 8,000 7,000 500 6,000 400 5,000 300 4,000 200 3,000 100 2,000 0 1,000 0 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Citizens Assisted 130 117 79 173 112 43 30 25 20 25 68 55 50 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Employ ees Assisted 60 56 43 39 52 79 65 75 37 70 97 172 85 Overtime 1,68 1,65 1,90 1,78 1,46 1,80 1,56 3,29 1,55 1,41 1,60 1,31 1,77 Applications Processed 269 364 122 373 174 1 0 0 35 0 2 0 75 Sick 1,01 1,34 2,63 1,48 1,50 1,90 2,01 4,83 2,17 3,32 1,96 961 732 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Category Total 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 * Caucasian 332 331 327 324 325 323 322 320 320 318 315 315 315 N/A * Minorities 63 62 62 60 60 61 61 61 61 61 61 62 63 N/A Hired ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 2 1 1 1 ‐ 1 ‐ 2 2 11 Terminated/Resigned/ 1 2 4 6 1 2 2 4 ‐ 3 4 1 1 31 Retired ** Promoted 1 1 ‐ 1 ‐ 1 ‐ 1 2 1 6 3 ‐ 17 Jobs Posted ‐ ‐ 1 1 1 ‐ 3 1 3 3 ‐ 3 ‐ 16 Workers Comp. Injuries 6 4 3 3 1 1 ‐ 4 2 2 3 4 8 41 Workers Comp. Hours 194 323 417 283 103 25 26 23 50 186 358 299 123 2,410 Insurance Claims 4 5 9 1 2 5 2 1 10 9 6 7 10 71 *A review has been completed to ensure the accuracy of the Caucasian and Minority employees. The figures for June 2009 reflect the revised and updated numbers. Workers’ Comp. hours may not be the result of injuries that occurred during the current month. ** Employee was promoted in July, however not indicated on report. Full‐time Employees: 362 Part‐time Employees: 16 (4 Pitts Center, 1 Recreation, 11 Library) Numbers do not reflect, temporary, seasonal, relief fire dispatchers, committee or council members. Hired: Two Patrolmen Retired: Utility Maintenance Mechanic II Unfilled/Open Positions Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun By Department 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Public Utilities 5 9 8 8 8 9 10 13 12 12 11 12 Public Services ‐ ‐ 1 1 2 43 3 3 3 4 4 Police 1 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 56 5 5 3 All Other Departments 8 8 8 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 11 12 Totals 14 20 20 21 22 27 26 27 30 30 31 31 31 30 January 2010 Public Services was overstated by 1. April 2010 ‐ Police understated by 1. Six vacancies existed and one Officer began terminal leave in April. Individuals on terminal leave (not included in Chart) : Police‐1; Public Utilities‐1 Vacant position filled with temp (included in Chart for Central Services) Public Utilities: Increased due to retirement of Utility Maintenance Mechanic II Police: Two vacancies filled. All Other Departments: Library employee finished terminal leave. 6 City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010

HUMAN RESOURCES continued Bonus Program Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Total Category 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Stop Program‐Sensibly Taking Off 8 17 4 20 57 ‐ 13 20 ‐ 20 24 41 42 258 Pounds(weigh‐ins) Caught Doing it Right‐ Promotes employees ‐ 7 ‐ 1 2 2 2 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 productivity & creativity (submissions) Breathe Program‐ Rewards for ending ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 ‐ ‐ 2 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 6 tobacco use (submissions) Ducs in a Row‐Doing Useful Community ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Service (submissions) Workers Comp Injuries 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Jun ‐ Jul ‐ Au g‐ Se p‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ De c‐ Jan‐ Feb ‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Ju n‐ 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Pub li c U ti li ti es Pub li c Servi ces Po li ce Others Public Utilities: 3 Public Services: 0 Police: 5 All Other Depts.: 0 Workers Comp Hours 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Public Ut ilit ies Public Services Police Ot hers Public Utilities: 0 Public Services: 3 Police: 120 All Other Depts.: 0 City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010 7

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Service Requests Resolved Citizen Action Center 150 127 123 127 250 226 123 125 108 211 102 108 102 200 178 182 100 81 170 81 79 162 161 163 73 79 153 153 73 151 75 53 59 59 150 132 53 123 50 40 41 36 36 32 34 34 32 100 25 0 50 Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 New Issues Customers w/ New Issues Supported PCs CityofDover.com Visitors 500 100,000 77,138 450 69,485 400 66,744 66,869 352 65,764 350 348 65,415 333 345 342 342 341 340 339 340 341 75,000 61,049 Pages Viewed 60,065 350 318 50,109 52,462 300 250 36,994 50,000 200 150 30,819 * 100 25,000 Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ -Jun -Jul -Aug -Sep -Oct -Nov -Dec -Jan -Feb -M ar -Apr -M ay -Jun 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 *Moved the site from Linux to larger Windows resource. Unable to obtain stat for July 2009. Same Current Last Performance Indicators Month Month Month Last Year iSeries Availability 100% 100% 100% Server Availability 100% 100% 99.9% Programming Requests 19 15 11 Completed AS/400 Connections 40% 41% 35% (concurrent/authorized users) PCs Supported 341 340 318 Scheduled PCs Replaced ‐ ‐ ‐ Servers Supported 16 16 16 People Trained 35 21 22 Availability Statistics based on 7:00 AM until 5:00 PM Monday—Friday 8 City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010

PARKS, RECREATION & LIBRARY Library Adult Services Children Services 3500 1200 3000 1000 2500 800 2000 600 1500 400 1000 500 200 0 0 Jun- Jul- A ug- Sep- Oct- No v- Dec- Jan- Feb- M ar- A pr- M ay- Jun- Jun- Jul- A ug- Sep- Oct- No v- Dec- Jan- Feb- M ar- A pr- M ay- Jun- 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Reference Reader's A dviso ry Outreach Electro nic A ssistance Reference Reader's A dviso ry Outreach Electro nic A ssistance Reference: 48 Reader’s Advisory: 35 Reference: 144 Reader’s Advisory: 57 Outreach: 420 Electronic Assistance: 50 Outreach: 63 Electronic Assistance: 24 CIRCULATION JUNE 10 FYTD 10 MAY 09 FYTD 09 Dover Residents N/A 151,813 18,475 207,555 Kent County Residents* N/A 148,757 17,874 205,529 Non‐County Residents N/A 12,263 1,300 15,549 REGISTRATIONS Dover Residents N/A 2,285 244 3,073 Kent County Residents* N/A 1,385 168 1,692 Non‐County Residents N/A 159 26 184 OTHER Visiting Patrons 35,854 358,381 37,834 395,217 Meeting Room Usage 180 3,220 240 2,080 Photocopier Usage 1,761 18,036 1,596 15,401 Dial‐A‐Story 1,740 16,204 1,246 17,217 Computer Usage 4,430 51,254 5,196 59,407 Holds (Total) N/A 47,430 6,025 63,725 N/A ‐ Statewide system at the Library that provides these numbers was not available. *Breakout of Kent County Residential Statistics Circulation Registrations Harrington: N/A Harrington: N/A Smyrna: N/A Smyrna: N/A Milford: N/A Milford: N/A Outside City Limits: N/A Outside City Limits: N/A N/A ‐ Statewide system at the Library that provides these numbers was not available. Total Registered Users: (Card Holders) City: 18,920 County: 17,798 New Castle & Sussex Counties: 1,661 Other Points of Interest: Interlibrary: 3,010 items loaned out Technical services: 195 items added 3,067 items borrowed 356 items deleted Volunteers: 307 hours of service completed City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010 9

Parks and Recreation Recreation Revenue Recreation Revenue Breakdown $30,000 $ 35,000 $25,000 $ 30,000 $20,000 $ 25,000 $15,000 $ 20,000 $10,000 $ 15,000 $5,000 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $0 Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ $0 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 General Rental Payments Sport s Leagues Trips General: $4,855 Rental Payments: $2,276 Sports: $3,482 Leagues: $4,000 Trips: $1,132 RENTALS JUNE 10 FYTD 10 JUNE 09 FYTD 09 Baseball/Softball Field Rentals* 33 227 50 285 Dover Park Pavilions (2) 13 31 12 36 Multipurpose/Field Hockey Field Rentals* 25 70 22 50 Recreation Center – Dover Park 39 167 20 158 Silver Lake Pavilions (2) / Schutte (1) 12 63 1 42 Soccer Field Rentals* 3 21 3 30 Stage – Mobile Platform 5 28 5 25 *These numbers reflect groups that utilized our facilities during June. PROGRAM ATTENDANCE* JUNE 10 FYTD 10 JUNE 09 FYTD 09 Yoga 7 7 New Program *This number reflects activities that took place in June. (Not included on the JWP report.) Pitts Center ‐ Total Program Attendence FREE Open Gym Registration Cards* ‐ through 6/30/2010 Total Cards Issued: 3,530 City Residents: 1,612 ‐ (46%) 12,043 15,000 Non‐City Residents: 1,918 ‐ (54%) ‐ Kent County: 1,521 ‐ (43%) ‐ Sussex County: 135 ‐ (4%) 7,374 # of people 10,000 6,082 5,753 ‐ New Castle County: 88 ‐ (2%) 3,975 ‐ Out of State: 174 ‐ (5%) 2,761 2,492 2,431 2,995 2,307 5,000 2,018 1,175 1,315 *The cards permit entrance to the facility during sched‐ uled Public Gym Periods at no charge. 0 Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010

PUBLIC SERVICES Administration Administrative review and inspection services continued on all residential and commercial developments. The following residential subdivisions are in various phases of construction: Oak Shadows Emerald Pointe Lexington Glenn Village of Westover (Phase VI) Farthing Woods Nottingham Meadows Stoney Creek (Phase II) Clearview Meadows Village of Cannon Mill Somerset Park Patriot Village Eden Hill (Residential) SANITATION Monthly Total Refuse (Tons) Sanitation Hours 1,052 1,500 1200 1009 1,078 1,032 1,041 1,012 1,002 1,029 1,028 987 1000 928 919 1,000 833 815 723 800 657.5 657 650 636 531 569 522 442 426 470 439 419 376 600 500 319 318 233 167 400 200 ‐ 38 42 16 3 June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 0 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bulk Collection Mechanized Hand Trash Container Electronic Goods Collection Collection Repair/Delivery Pickup Bulk Automated Jun 10 Jun 09 JUNE 10 FYTD10 JUNE 09 FYTD 09 Tons Dry Waste Collected 173.13 1,840.74 237.51 1,874.09 Tipping Fee Savings Realized $3,376.24 $35,894.64 $4,631.45 $36,544.74 Trips to DSWA Sandtown Landfill 296 2,950 272 3,162 Total Tonnage to DSWA 1,468.03 15,962.73 1,608.93 16,547.80 90‐Gallon Containers Delivered 46 345 41 426 300‐Gallon Containers Delivered ‐ 41 4 80 Total Man Hours‐containers Delivered 38 441 42 702 CURBSIDE RECYCLING TOTAL # OF HOUSEHOLDS WEIGHT/LBS. % PICKED UP STATS HOUSEHOLDS PICKED UP MAY 2010* 11,028 7,697 173,664 70% City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010 11

STREETS JUNE 10 FYTD10 JUNE 09 FYTD 09 Signed Installed 19 251 11 296 Signs Repaired 7 152 45 240 Curbs Painted Yellow (feet) 532 25,810 ‐ 31,239 New Post Installed 3 142 2 53 Storm Catch Basins Cleaned ‐ 1,296 ‐ 1,596 Storm Catch Basin Cleaning (Hrs) ‐ 473 ‐ 278 Hot Mix Patching (Tons) 25 680 89 372 Cold Mix Patching (Hrs) 88 518 88 527 Concrete Work (Hrs) 162 783 48 494 Concrete Patching (Cubic Yards) 49 82 15 48 Street and Alley Maintenance (Hrs) 153 1,681 151 1,773 Street Sweeping (Miles) 1,837 11,973 1,677 13,516 Street Sweeping (Cubic Yards) 312 2,717 300 2,364 Leaves Collected (Cubic Yards) ‐ 11,161 ‐ 10,175 Leaf Collection (Miles) ‐ 5,890 ‐ 6,188 GROUNDS ‐ Arborist Crew JUNE 10 JUNE 09 Trees Trimmed 28 69 Trees Removed 13 5 – Finished removing trees on the earthen part of the Silver Lake dam. – Worked on a number of alleyways to give clearance for sanitation vehicles. Beautification Crew – Continued planting of annual beds. – Maintenance of planted annual beds including weeding, scratching, edging and watering. Grounds Maintenance/Mowing Crews – Applied a total of 42 gallons of Round Up herbicide at Construction, Facilities Management shops and at Silver Lake Park. – Cut down the perennials on the island in Court Street, because of visibility issues. Special Projects Crew – Made yard repairs at 1210 Westview Terrace and 111 Vondaway Drive. – Landscaped part of Firehouse #2 including removing plants, and a large stump. Planted 3 new shrubs and installing more ¾” chocolate stone. 12 City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010

ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT UNEMPLOYMENT RATES DEC 09 JAN 10 FEB 10 MAR 10 APR 10 MAY 10 JUN 10 City of Dover 8.8% 9.0% 10.2% 9.6% 9.6% 9.5% PENDING National & State averages (US‐9.7% & State‐8.8%) Source: State of Delaware Department of Labor Number of contacts made with small businesses and with out‐of‐town companies interested in locating to Dover. TYPE YTD Contacts Made Small Businesses 11 Out‐of‐town Companies 8 Presentation given to Colonial Rotary on the City Economic Development Office and Downtown Dover Partnership. Attended ribbon cutting ceremony of ILC’s new facility. Met with Kent Economic Partnership to discuss the sharing of information. Met with staff from MacQuarie Energy LLC and DEDO to discuss the air permitting process. Staff also arranged a meeting with the civil engineering section at Dover Air Force Base and representatives of MacQuarie. DOWNTOWN DOVER PARTNERSHIP Staff meet with the City Manager to begin development of an action plan, as follow‐up to the recruitment workshop held in May 2010. A meeting was held with DDP staff, Dover Kent County MPO and Becker Morgan to discuss developing ideas for the area surrounding the new Transit Center and the Loockerman Street corridor? Staff also met with the City Planner and Cpt. Getek from the Dover Police Department to discuss potential regulations on businesses that serve alcohol. The downtown merchants met to review the calendar of events planned for the next six months. A follow‐up meeting to discuss these events will be held in conjunction with the DDP Marketing & Promotions Committee. The Parking Committee conducted a walking tour of the parking lots managed by the committee. A report has been pre‐ pared on conditions in the individual lots and maintenance issues have been identified. The Organization Committee set October 1, 2010 as the date for its annual reception and volunteer recognition event to coin‐ cide with the First Friday activities. The Design Committee organized a student art display as part of the continuing Vacancy Treatment Project. Art work from the Lt. Governor’s “Helping Hands” art contest is now on display at 24 W Loockerman and 200 W Loockerman Street. . The DDP finalized the sale of property on West Street to be used as the site for the NAPA store. A lease was signed with the Inner City Cultural League for the parcel on West Street that will be site of their new Cultural Cen‐ ter. City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010 13

LIFE SAFETY Inspections JUNE 10 FYTD10 Fire and Safety Inspections 43 458 Fire Code Inspections 14 743 Certificate of Occupancy 7 82 Non‐Inspection Hours Office 56 1,143 Meetings 23 426 Plan Review 10 582 Training 46 548 Fire Education ‐ 42 Fire Investigations 97 434 Accidental $ 3,500 $ 388,800 Incendiary $ ‐ $ 142,800 Undetermined $1,000,000 $1,053,000 PERMITTING AND LICENSING Permits Issued JUNE 10 FYTD10 JUNE 09 FYTD 09 Building Addition/Renovation Permits 64 500 51 587 Building Permits 7 112 12 111 Demolition Permits 3 41 1 35 Fence Permits 5 92 11 118 Fire Prevention Permits 11 93 ‐ 101 Mechanical Permits 45 399 45 533 Plumbing Permits 39 758 62 678 Sign Permits 14 266 45 265 Swimming Pool Permits 4 9 ‐ 15 Business Licenses 662 2,124 940 2,831 Merchant Licenses 88 387 92 445 Contractor Licenses 261 1,083 406 1,360 Lodging House Licenses ‐ 45 ‐ 49 Mobile Homes 183 653 138 387 Public Occupancy 6 354 2 315 Rental Dwelling 45 2,874 25 2,690 BUILDING INSPECTIONS Permits Issued JUNE 10 FYTD10 JUNE 09 FYTD 09 Building 396 4,451 539 4,397 Plumbing/Mechanical 564 3,785 536 3,389 Certificate of Occupancy 28 250 10 276 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) – Set up Dover EOC Profile on Microsoft Sky Drive – Created numerous maps, flyers, and posters for Main Street and African American Festival – Created a matrix of all PVC pipes in the water system for the Water/Wastewater Department 14 City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010

PUBLIC UTILITIES ELECTRIC System Peak Total System Load 200.0 100,000 164.1 78,500 74,934 90,000 161.1 71,603 147.2 66,117 80,000 63,350 63,373 133.8 59,833 60,764 127.6 128.1 56,420 56,857 57,103 150.0 70,000 54,029 52,792 60,000 103.7 107.0 104.0 107.7 99.1 98.2 98.1 50,000 100.0 40,000 30,000 20,000 50.0 10,000 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 Outages Customers of Gained/Lost 20 25,000 60 52 20,000 48 50 15 Customers 15,000 40 Outages 10 32 10,000 30 23 5 20 17 17 5,000 15 15 13 11 10 7 5 0 0 3 June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 0 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Outages Customers 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 Outages: 12 Customers: 4,546 Electric Monthly Outage Report The annual outage goal will be less than 295 minutes per customer, which is a Delaware Standard. This will be measured by calculating the System Average Interruption Duration Index. FY 10 YTD FY 09 FY 08 177.67 172.67 84.75 Controllable Outage Average Response Time Annual goal is less than 40 Goal is less than 30 minutes Month Year‐to‐date Month Year‐to‐date 3 27 31.5 Minutes 36.08 Minutes City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010 15

ELECTRIC ENGINEERING DESIGN Major Program Updates JUNE 10 JUNE 09 DIFF FY10 YTD FY09 Extensions Design Completed Within 30 days of 0 0 ‐ 1 4 complete Submission New Underground Installation % Completed New Underground Installation % Completed  Kent General Hospital Ongoing  Farthing Woods Ongoing  Crossgates Development Ongoing  Buchanan Acres Ongoing  Mid City Substation Circuits Ongoing PROGRAM UPDATES JUNE 10 JUNE 09 FY10 YTD Tree Trimming 209 332 2079 Number of Oil Releases 1 1 4 Lost Time Accidents – All Electric Utility Divisions 0 0 0 New Services 11 16 Major Goals Completed in the Past Two Months N/A 16 City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010

Water Production/Billed Consumption/Flow to Kent County 300,000,000 250,000,000 200,000,000 150,000,000 100,000,000 50,000,000 0 Jun 09 Jul 09 Aug 09 Sep 09 Oct 09 Nov 09 Dec 09 Jan 10 Feb 10 Mar 10 Apr 10 May 10 Jun 10 Total Water Prod. Billed Consumpt. Total Flow to County City Readings ENGINEERING SUMMARY Major Program Updates JUNE 10 JUNE 09 DIFF FY10 YTD FY09 State and Federal Violations 0 violations 0 violations ‐ ‐ ‐ Water Quality Complaints 7 17 ‐10 358 413 Plan Review Completed Within 30 days of 13 plans 12 plans 1 97% 96% Submission 100% 100% plans Field Inspection Response within 48 hours of 100% 100% ‐ 100% 100% Request Major Goals Completed in the Past Two Months  Fox Hall Force Main reroute was completed. OPERATIONAL SUMMARY TASK JUNE 10 JUNE 09 CURRENT FY Water Production – Daily Average 5,743,767 4,380,700 4,215,894 Average Field Response Time (goal is < 30 minutes) 23.5 17 19 Water Mains Repaired 1 5 8 Water Service Lines Repaired 3 9 25 Wastewater Mains Repaired ‐ ‐ 16 Wastewater Service Lines Repaired ‐ 2 21 Sewer Lines Flushed – Linear Feet 135,067 72,124 814,659 Percentage of Flow Sent to Kent County vs. Gallons Billed 117% 106% 137% (inflow/Infiltration monitoring) Total Water Meters in City Distribution System 13,827 13,682 150 Lost Time Accidents – All Water/Wastewater Divisions ‐ ‐ 1 City Manager’s Monthly Report, June 2010 17

CITY PLANNER’S MONTHLY REPORT Public Services Group P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Phone: (302) 736-7010 Fax (302) 736-4217 June 2010 PERSONNEL Planning Staff and members of the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment and Historic District Commission participated in a workshop training on parliamentary procedure on June 9th. EDEN HILL FARM TND During June construction continued on a set of six townhouses in the Residential District of Eden Hill Farm Traditional Neighborhood Design. The total unit count remains at thirty-five (35) residential units for the development. A Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the first duplex unit located on South Greenberry Lane. In June, there was no specific activity associated with the Professional Office, Medical & Financial District. The Revised Implementation Plan (March 2009) for Neighborhood Commercial District remains in the Check Print review process working towards Final Plan approval; no plan resubmissions for review were received in June. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION In June, Planning Staff continued to focus efforts on the short term implementation items identified in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as amended. Staff continues to research and develop a draft ordinance as part of the process to update the Environmental Protections within the Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance text amendment creating the Recreational and Open Space Zone (ROS) was adopted by City Council on June 14. Following map analysis, the Planning Staff began the notification of property owners whose properties are proposed to be rezoned to ROS. The First Reading of the 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning: ROS Rezoning was completed on June 28 with the Planning Commission review scheduled for July. Other tasks include focusing on the development of other Zoning Ordinance text amendments including the presentation to the Legislative, Finance & Administration Committee of a text amendment to update the Board of Adjustment provisions with its First Reading on June 28th. The Planning Staff has also taken over responsibility for administering the City’s NPDES Permit for our municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4). PERMITTING AND LICENSING REVIEW The Planning Staff is part of the Building Permit review process. Our activities involving reviewing specific types of permit applications for compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and for compliance with any conditions of approval from the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment, or Historic District Commission. Permits Reviewed January- February- March- Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 # (Issued) 10 10 10 Reviewed (Issued) YTD Building 16 15 25 30 22 40 148 Additions/Renovations/ Shed Permits Building Permits 12 10 9 5 8 6 50

Demolition Permits 3 5 2 2 2 3 17 Fence Permits 4 0 8 16 11 5 44 Sign Permits 12 10 12 5 11 7 57 Temporary Sign Permits 7 3 9 4 8 4 35 Swimming Pool Permits 0 0 0 2 2 4 8 Certificate of Occupancy 6 6 9 11 24 28 84 Total # Permits 60 49 74 75 88 97 443 Reviewed (Issued) CODE ENFORCEMENT Case Type # cases # cases % staff % staff current month YTD initiated initiated YTD current month No valid rental permit 7 65 100% 97% No valid building permit 10 17 60% 76% Tall grass and weeds 73 270 71% 55% Unregistered vehicle 2 31 50% 55% Abandoned vehicle 3 54 67% 43% Annual Housing 52 285 90% 95% Inspection CO Inspection – 1 1 100% 100% Planning Property Maintenance – 43 230 35% 55% Exterior Electric Termination 20 101 5% 7% Dover Code of 26 360 69% 29% Ordinances Zoning 5 65 20% 71% Basketball goal 6 17 33% 41% Total Cases 248 1496 Total # of Inspections 351 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FISCAL YEAR 2008 Dover Interfaith Ministry to the Homeless Renovations are 100% complete for the Homeless Shelter. All funding has been expended. FISCAL YEAR 2009 Homeowner Rehabilitation Program Three (3) homes have been completed (49 S. Kirkwood St., 420 Court St., 720 Carol St.) Bids will go out late July for (4) owner occupied homes to be rehabilitated. Homeownership Assistance Program (Down Payment Assistance) Three (3) families have purchased homes and all funding for this project has been expended.

Elizabeth W. Murphey School The installation of the underground steam pipes is a 100% complete in restoring the buildings heating source and all funding has been expended. RC & D Emergency Home Repairs Emergency home repairs have been completed on eleven (11) homes eliminating health and safety hazards. All funding for this project has been expended. Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) The city was awarded $1,426,740 for the acquisition and rehab of foreclosed properties. A total of $1,206,990 has been expended on the acquisition of 8 properties and renovations for 2 properties. The remaining balance of $232,209 will be utilized for renovations. One property has been sold, 1 is under contract, and 4 are being renovated. MEETING REPORTS Board of Adjustment: The Board of Adjustment met on June 16, 2010 and took the following actions. The next Board of Adjustment meeting is scheduled for July 21, 2010. 1. Applicant #V-10-06 - 381 College Road, People’s Place Properties Inc – Moved to approve for the planting of 10 trees and ensure that it complies with the Zoning Code requirement. Approval of the variance is related to the Exceptional Practical Difficulties based on the mission of organization and the fact that the trees were removed prior to their acquisition and unaware and that it is not a high quality woodland it is more of a scrub. 2. Applicant #V-10-07 - 1450 N. DuPont Hwy., Chick-Fil-A – Moved to approve. 3. Applicant #V-10-08 - 245 & 249 N. West Street, Lands of Dover Community Partnership – Moved to approve for two (2) separate lots as presented for the reasons expressed by the applicant and as stated in the Staff report. Historic District Commission: The Historic District Commission met on June 10, 2010 and took the actions listed below. The next regularly scheduled meeting for the Historic District Commission is July 15, 2010. Discussion is ongoing regarding updating the Historic District Guidelines. 1. HI-09-04 Bayard Hotel at 200-216 West Loockerman Street – No action was taken at this time, applicant will return with an update at the July meeting. 2. HI-10-01 Building at 301 South Governors Avenue - Moved to declare this building Demolition by Neglect and suggest that they (the property owner) take action as outlined in the letter of October 2007 and give them 90 days. 3. HI-10-05 Duncan Plaza: Architectural Review Certification – Moved to waive the setbacks in accordance with the footprint that has been presented, and to approve the motion as fully amended including that the suggestions/comments of the Staff recommendation comments #1-21 be addressed with no impact on setbacks Planning Commission The Planning Commission met on June 21, 2010 and took the actions summarized listed below. The next scheduled Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for July 19, 2010. 1. S-09-28 NAPA Auto Parts at 39 South West Street - Moved to approve the waiver request, reduction of four parking spaces.

2. Z-10-05 Lands of Route 8 & Saulsbury Road, LLC at Saulsbury Road - Moved to forward a recommendation of approval to City Council from CPO to C-2A and to also include the COZ-1 zone. 3. Z-10-06 Lands of Mor-Kath-Ric, LLC at 217 & 223 McKee Road - Moved to postpone and refer it to a certain date of 60 days or until the August Planning Commission meeting to give the two parties, the applicant and the homeowners, the opportunity to discuss a compromise solution. 4. Z-10-07 Lands of Robert & Nancy Kauffman at 40-60 Ridgely Street - Moved to forward a recommendation of approval to City Council from M & COZ-1 to C-3 & COZ-1. 5. C-10-01 Pregnancy Help Center of Kent County at 732 South State Street – Moved to deny with the concern that it is strictly not with the harmony of the use within the residential neighborhood and the intensity of the use that it could potentially bring there. There is an entire residential use north, east, south and west of this property and he believes that this use other than residential is not appropriate for the neighborhood. 6. S-10-12 Wesley United Methodist Church: Elevator and Canopy Addition - Moved to approve to include approval of moving the bicycle parking from where Staff recommended it be placed by the new addition to the educational facility, and to eliminate the requirement to consolidate the parcels at this time and along with approval of the Architectural Review Certificate and approval of the partial elimination of curbing. 7. S-10-13 YMCA at 1137 South State Street - Moved to approve to include the waiver request for partial elimination of curbing, elimination of the opaque barrier, and the reduction of loading spaces from 3 to 1. Submitted by: Ann Marie Townshend, AICP Planning & Community Development Director

FY 09-10 City Funded Account Balance Sheet ACCOUNT BUDGET SPENT BALANCE Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance $ 60,500.00 $ 69,229.99 $ (8,729.99) Gasoline $ 21,000.00 $ 23,127.96 $ (2,127.96) Medical Supplies $ 700.00 $ 639.60 $ 60.40 Other Equipment Repairs $ 4,000.00 $ 3,957.12 $ 42.88 Program Expenses $ 36,630.00 $ 26,340.91 $ 10,289.09 Radio Repairs $ 2,000.00 $ 1,801.55 $ 198.45 Safety & Security $ 3,150.00 $ 3,423.07 $ (273.07) Small Tools $ 4,800.00 $ 5,442.66 $ (642.66) Uniforms & Firefighting Gear $ 26,100.00 $ 24,848.38 $ 1,251.62 Building Expenses- Electricity $ 53,820.00 $ 54,578.52 $ (758.52) Building Maintenance Supplies $ 1,950.00 $ 1,229.21 $ 720.79 Heating Expenses- Gas $ 20,000.00 $ 17,820.65 $ 2,179.35 Telephone $ 19,340.00 $ 18,150.85 $ 1,189.15 Water & Sewer $ 2,150.00 $ 2,821.51 $ (671.51) Contractual Services $ 16,587.00 $ 16,587.00 $ - Training & Travel $ 8,365.00 $ 10,993.44 $ (2,628.44) Pension $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ - Office Supplies $ 200.00 $200.00 $ - Balance as of: 06/30/10

10:45 AM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 07/04/10 Profit & Loss Detail Accrual Basis June 2010 Type Date Num Name Memo Clr Split Amount Balance Ordinary Income/Expense Expense Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance Gasoline Check 6/28/2010 222 City of Dover Fuel Charges City Fund Acco... 1,035.87 1,035.87 Total Gasoline 1,035.87 1,035.87 Program Expenses Check 6/9/2010 209 Motorola Inv 13788363 City Fund Acco... 6,828.16 6,828.16 Check 6/9/2010 212 Safeware Inv 3187818 City Fund Acco... 132.98 6,961.14 Check 6/12/2010 216 Magnum Inv 19236 City Fund Acco... 4,634.30 11,595.44 Total Program Expenses 11,595.44 11,595.44 Radio Repairs Check 6/28/2010 225 Magnum Invoices- 224... City Fund Acco... 3,267.00 3,267.00 Total Radio Repairs 3,267.00 3,267.00 Safety & Security Material Check 6/12/2010 215 Delaware Fire & Saf... Inv 4678 City Fund Acco... 1,003.00 1,003.00 Total Safety & Security Material 1,003.00 1,003.00 Small Tolls Check 6/9/2010 200 Kunkel Auto Supply 056417210/0... City Fund Acco... 32.45 32.45 Check 6/12/2010 218 Pugh's Service, Inc. 2 saws repaired City Fund Acco... 245.06 277.51 Check 6/28/2010 227 Zep Sales & Service Inv 68546208 City Fund Acco... 366.76 644.27 Total Small Tolls 644.27 644.27 Uniforms Check 6/9/2010 201 Capitol Uniform Cleaning of Di... City Fund Acco... 46.12 46.12 Check 6/9/2010 206 D.E. Williams Inv 2007610 City Fund Acco... 577.00 623.12 Check 6/9/2010 208 Dover Army-Navy St... Inv 17446 City Fund Acco... 189.90 813.02 Check 6/9/2010 210 Municipal Emergenc... Inv 00166319... City Fund Acco... 16,816.32 17,629.34 Check 6/12/2010 217 Municipal Emergenc... Inv 00165589... City Fund Acco... 132.39 17,761.73 Check 6/28/2010 221 Capitol Uniform 842217-0 City Fund Acco... 11.53 17,773.26 Check 6/28/2010 223 Dover Army-Navy St... Inv 17483 City Fund Acco... 94.90 17,868.16 Total Uniforms 17,868.16 17,868.16 Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance - Other Check 6/9/2010 199 Dover Automotive Inv 357259 City Fund Acco... 67.56 67.56 Check 6/12/2010 219 Singer Associates Numerous Inv... City Fund Acco... 3,487.94 3,555.50 Total Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance - Other 3,555.50 3,555.50 Total Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance 38,969.24 38,969.24 Page 1

10:45 AM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 07/04/10 Profit & Loss Detail Accrual Basis June 2010 Type Date Num Name Memo Clr Split Amount Balance Building Utilities Electricity Check 6/9/2010 205 City of Dover Sta 1 City Fund Acco... 2,860.47 2,860.47 Check 6/12/2010 214 City of Dover Station 2 City Fund Acco... 576.12 3,436.59 Total Electricity 3,436.59 3,436.59 Heating Expenses Check 6/9/2010 202 Chesapeake Utilities Sta 2 City Fund Acco... 63.24 63.24 Check 6/9/2010 203 Chesapeake Utilities Sta 1 City Fund Acco... 193.71 256.95 Total Heating Expenses 256.95 256.95 Telephone Check 6/9/2010 204 Chief Web Design Chief Messagi... City Fund Acco... 294.00 294.00 Check 6/9/2010 213 Verizon Wireless Apr 21 to May... City Fund Acco... 408.99 702.99 Check 6/28/2010 222 City of Dover Phone Charges City Fund Acco... 801.18 1,504.17 Total Telephone 1,504.17 1,504.17 Water/Sewer Check 6/9/2010 205 City of Dover Sta 1- Electric... City Fund Acco... 183.50 183.50 Check 6/12/2010 214 City of Dover Station 2- Ele... City Fund Acco... 23.92 207.42 Total Water/Sewer 207.42 207.42 Total Building Utilities 5,405.13 5,405.13 Office Supplies Check 6/26/2010 220 Staples Acct # 6035 5... City Fund Acco... 325.65 325.65 Check 6/28/2010 222 City of Dover Office Supplies City Fund Acco... 31.13 356.78 Total Office Supplies 356.78 356.78 Training & Travel Expenses Check 6/9/2010 207 Delaware State Fire ... Inv 10-2753 City Fund Acco... 975.00 975.00 Check 6/9/2010 211 David Mick Hotel Costs-D... City Fund Acco... 307.41 1,282.41 Check 6/28/2010 224 Delaware State Fire ... Inv 10-2839 a... City Fund Acco... 1,750.00 3,032.41 Check 6/28/2010 226 Priority Dispatch Cor... EFD Training-... City Fund Acco... 3,613.50 6,645.91 Total Training & Travel Expenses 6,645.91 6,645.91 Total Expense 51,377.06 51,377.06 Net Ordinary Income -51,377.06 -51,377.06 Net Income -51,377.06 -51,377.06 Page 2

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: City Council AGENDA ITEM NO.: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Utilities – Wastewater DATE SUBMITTED: 07-27-10 PREPARED BY: Ron Lunt, Public Utilities Director SUBJECT: System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Equipment Technology Upgrade REFERENCE: CIP – SCADA Equipment Technology Upgrade RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: City Manager, Controller EXHIBITS: Quote and Sole Vendor Information from Siemens Energy, Inc. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $43,600 AMOUNT BUDGETED: $82,100 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Public Utilities – Wastewater Management, SCADA Equipment Technology Upgrade, CIP page 84, Account Number 417-6900-569.40-31. This is one component of the tasks proposed within this project. TIME TABLE: Order will be placed following Council approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends purchasing six (6) RTU units, four (4) for $7,415 and two (2) for $6,970, from the sole vendor, Siemens Energy, Inc., for a total amount of $43,600. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The purpose of the SCADA Equipment Technology Upgrade project is to replace antiquated and/or obsolete remote terminal units (RTUs) at sewage pumping stations. The SCADA system monitors the pumping stations and communicates with the System Operations center when station components fail or other abnormal issues are detected. The Public Utilities Department intends to purchase six (6) RTU units. Installation and associated work is to be performed under either the existing SCADA Maintenance Contract or by staff personnel. There will be other expenses associated for the installations such as the radio equipment and miscellaneous hardware. These RTU’s are the field components of the SCADA system, which is a proprietary system; therefore, we are required to purchase the new RTU’s from the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) Siemens Energy, Inc. This sole vendor information has been attached.

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: City Council AGENDA ITEM NO.: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Utilities DATE SUBMITTED: 7/29/10 PREPARED BY: Ronald Lunt, Public Utilities Director SUBJECT: LED Street Light Conversion REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: City Manager, Controller EXHIBITS: N/A EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Not to exceed $70,087 AMOUNT BUDGETED: $70,087.00 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept/Page in CIP & Budget): Funding is provided from the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant. The account number is 487-8300-563-50-76, DOE LED Lighting, project # EE1009. TIMETABLE: Contract to be executed upon Council approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends awarding a contract to LED Roadway Lighting for an amount not to exceed $70,087. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS President Obama’s America Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) was adopted by Congress on February 13, 2009. The Act allocated $3.2 billion to the Department of Energy (DOE) to fund energy efficiency and conservation initiatives. The DOE created a formula grant program called the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG), for projects that reduce total energy use and fossil fuel emissions, and improve energy efficiency. From this fund the City of Dover received $180,400, which will be used to install a 10 kW photovoltaic system at McKee Run, replace motors in sewer pump stations and water wells, and install these LED Street lights on roads within Dover. Since the proposal to DOE (which envisioned 71 lights) the cost of the LED lights have decreased and it is the intent of the utility staff to purchase more lights than originally estimated, yet keeping under the funding sub-allocation. Proposals were solicited and advertised according to City Policy by the City’s Contract and Procurement Manager under RFP #10-0039DPU and thirteen (13) proposals were received. The proposals were evaluated based on RP-8 compliance, price, years of manufacture, driver life, LED life, power consumption, photo controller life and ability to meet specifications. The RP-8 compliance is related to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) recommended practice for providing design basis for lighting roadways. This standard requires design criteria that thoroughly analyzes and illustrates the design process involving luminance of the roadway to ensure the safety of the vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Since this is requirement was paramount to the evaluation criteria the seven proposals that did not include this information, as required by the specifications, were deemed non-compliant and not evaluated. Three staff members independently rated the proposals and below is a table that quantifies these ratings. Company Name Rating LED Roadway Lighting 336 WESCO/GE 323 WESCO/AEL 320 United Electric 318 LED Lighting Solutions 315 Illuminations Inc. 251 It is staff’s recommendation that the contract be awarded to the highest rated proposal based on the aforementioned criteria. This contract will purchase 118 streetlight heads.

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: City Council AGENDA ITEM NO.: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Utilities – Wastewater DATE SUBMITTED: 07-29-10 PREPARED BY: Ron Lunt, Public Utilities Director SUBJECT: Evaluation of Bids – Sanitary Sewer Main Relining (Inflow & Infiltration Removal) REFERENCE: CIP – Inflow / Infiltration Removal RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: City Manager, Controller EXHIBITS: N/A EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $1,307,300 AMOUNT BUDGETED: $1,800,000 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Public Utilities – Wastewater Management, Inflow / Infiltration Removal, CIP page 175, Account Number 417- 6900-569.40-31, Project Number WW1001. This project is funded through the Delaware Water Pollution Control Revolving Loan Fund program which is administered by DNREC, Division of Water Resources. TIME TABLE: Notice to Proceed to be issued within 30 days of Council approval. Substantial completion to be achieved within 180 days. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the low bid submitted by Lanzo Lining Services, Inc. in the amount of $1,307,300 for the relining of the Division Street Interceptor and portions of the Northwest Interceptor. Also, a not to exceed amount of $492,700 will be allocated for additional relining projects. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The Budget for Public Utilities – Wastewater Management includes the Inflow / Infiltration Removal capital project to correct areas in the sanitary sewer collection system that are deteriorating and allowing groundwater to enter the sanitary sewer system through cracked pipes and/or through poorly sealed joints. Eliminating infiltration into the City’s sanitary sewer mains will result in reduced pumping and treatment costs. Issues identified within the wastewater system are to be addressed through the Inflow / Infiltration CIP. During FY ‘06 a Sanitary Sewer Inflow & Infiltration Study was conducted which included the cleaning and video inspection of 18,243 l.f. of four (4) of the major sanitary sewer interceptors in the City. As a result of the study, 5,006 l.f. of various sized sanitary sewer mains were identified for relining and point repairs. The FY ’10 Budget included the Inflow / Infiltration CIP to allow for the relining and/or repair of issues identified within portions of the study area. Sanitary sewer lines identified for relining in this project consist of twelve‐inch (12”), twenty‐four inch (24”), twenty‐seven inch (27”) and thirty‐inch (30”) diameter pipes. The bid package was advertised by the City’s Contract and Procurement Manager under Bid #10‐0033DPU and was opened on June 30, 2010. The following two (2) contractors submitted bids for the proposed project. CONTRACTOR LOCATION AMOUNT OF BID Abel Recon, Inc. Mountville, PA $1,555,348.88 Lanzo Lining Service, Inc. Deerfield Beach, FL $1,307,300.00 City staff reviewed the Lanzo Lining Services bid package and found it free of math errors and/or discrepancies. In addition, staff has reviewed the contractor’s qualification information which included a list of recently completed projects similar in material scope to the sanitary sewer relining project and their financial statement and found all information to be adequate. The low bid represents fair market value; and their qualifications are in accordance with the requirements of this project. The type of fiberglass liner used did not meet specifications; however, staff is waiving this as a technicality as it meets all strength, thickness, and final product requirements. The additional funds requested over the bid amount will be for sections of pipe that have been identified but not included in the original scope because of the budget estimates. The pricing for the additional work will be based on the unit pricing submitted in the bid response.

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-23 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL 2 MET: 3 That Article II - Mayor and Council, Section 5 - Council to be legislative body; size; districts; terms of 4 mayor and councilmen; qualifications, of the Charter of the City of Dover shall be amended by deleting the 5 text indicated in red strikeout as follows: 6 Sec. 5. Council to be legislative body; size; districts; terms of mayor and councilmen; qualifications. 7 The council shall be the legislative body of the city and composed of nine members nominated and 8 elected as herein provided. 9 In order that the members of council shall be distributed over the city, the city shall be divided into 10 four election districts, the district boundaries of which shall be established by council so that the districts 11 are nearly equal in population as shown by the most recent federal decennial census. The district boundaries 12 established for municipal elections shall continue in effect until the next succeeding federal decennial census 13 is made available for use by municipalities in the State of Delaware, at which time council shall redistrict 14 the city so that the districts shall be nearly equal in population in accordance with said census, which 15 redistricting shall be used for the next regular municipal election, which procedure shall be followed by 16 council after each succeeding federal decennial census in this manner so that the districts shall be maintained 17 as nearly equal in population as possible at all times. 18 The term of mayor shall be for a period of two years commencing on the second Monday in May 19 following their election and continuing for a term of two years until the second Monday in May or until their 20 successor has been duly elected and qualified. 21 The term of the councilmen shall be for two years. In each regular municipal election held in an odd 22 numbered year, five councilmen shall be elected, four by district voting being from the districts and one 23 at-large as stated herein. In each regular municipal election held in an even numbered year, four councilmen 24 shall be elected by district voting from each of the districts of the city. 25 In order to be eligible to be elected as mayor or as a member of council, the person must as of the 26 date of the election be: 27 (1) A citizen of the United States and of the State of Delaware; 28 (2) A resident of the city and having continuously resided therein or in an area annexed to the 29 city during the two years next preceding the day of the election; 30 (3) A resident of the election district from which they are seeking election, unless they are 31 seeking election as an at-large councilman or mayor; 32 (4) Eighteen years of age; and 33 (5) Nominated therefore, as hereinafter provided.

Proposed Ordinance #2010-23 - Requirement to Step Down When Running for Other Office Page 2 34 Holding Other Office. Except where authorized by law, no council members shall hold any other 35 elected public office during the term for which the member was elected to the council. No council member 36 shall hold any other city office or employment during the term for which the member was elected to the 37 council. No former council members shall hold any compensated appointive office or employment with the 38 city until one year after the expiration of the term for which the member was elected to the council, unless 39 granted a waiver by the Board of Ethics (Ethics Commission). 40 If a councilman files and runs for mayor, whether or not they are elected to said office, the 41 term as councilman shall automatically expire on the second Monday of May on the year of the 42 election; and if they have a year remaining on their term, then their office as councilman shall he filled 43 at the same annual election in which they have filed to run for the office of mayor. 44 NOTE: A Resolution requesting the General Assembly to amend the Charter will be presented to City 45 Council with the Final Reading. 46 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED 47 That Chapter 30 - Code of Conduct and Ethics Commission, Article III - Ethics Commission, Section 30-71 48 - Established; composition; removal; terms of office; vacancies; chairperson; quorum; compensation; legal 49 counsel, Paragraph (a) - Established; composition; removal, be amended by deleting the text indicated in 50 red strikeout as follows: 51 ARTICLE III. ETHICS COMMISSION 52 Sec. 30-71. Established; composition; removal; terms of office; vacancies; chairperson; quorum; 53 compensation; legal counsel. 54 (a) Established; composition; removal. The city ethics commission is hereby established to 55 administer and implement this chapter. The ethics commission shall consist of five members 56 appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the city council. No member of the commission shall hold 57 any elected or appointed office under the government of the United States or the state, county, or 58 city, or be a candidate for any such office. Members of the ethics commission may be removed 59 by the mayor, with the concurrence of the city council, for substantial neglect of duty, gross 60 misconduct in office or a violation of this chapter. 61 (b) Terms of office; vacancies. A member of the ethics commission shall be appointed for a term 62 of office of five years and until his successor has been appointed and has qualified. The members 63 shall be appointed for staggered terms of office, and until their successors have been appointed. 64 When a vacancy occurs in the membership of the ethics commission, it shall be filled by 65 appointment for the unexpired portion of the term in the same manner as the original appointment. 66 (c) Chairperson; quorum. The ethics commission shall elect a chairperson from among its 67 membership. Three members of the ethics commission shall constitute a quorum and, if a quorum 68 is present, a vacancy on the ethics commission shall not impair the right of the remaining members 69 to exercise all the powers of the ethics commission. Disciplinary hearings may be conducted and 70 sanctions may be imposed only by the affirmative action of at least three members; otherwise, the 71 ethics commission may delegate authority to the chairperson to act for the ethics commission 72 between meetings.

Proposed Ordinance #2010-23 - Requirement to Step Down When Running for Other Office Page 3 73 (d) Compensation. Members of the ethics commission shall receive no compensation. 74 (e) Legal counsel. The city solicitor shall provide legal counsel to the ethics commission and shall 75 be the legal representative of the ethics commission in connection with its duties hereunder, on a 76 case-by-case basis, or determine that outside counsel is needed and obtain such outside counsel for 77 a particular matter. 78 (Code 1981, § 2-13; Ord. of 7-13-1998) 79 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED 80 That Chapter 58 - Human Relations, Article II - Human Relations Commission, Section 58-32 - 81 Established; composition; appointment; representation; holding other office; removal from office; terms of 82 office; vacancies; reappointments, be amended by deleting the text indicated in red strikeout as follows: 83 Sec. 58-32. Established; composition; appointment; representation; holding other office; removal 84 from office; terms of office; vacancies; reappointments. 85 (a) Established. There is hereby established an advisory commission to be known as the "City of 86 Dover Human Relations Commission," to carry out the objectives as described in this article. 87 (b) Composition; appointment. The commission shall consist of 15 members, all residents of the 88 city. Five of these members shall be appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the city council. Ten 89 of these members shall be appointed by the president of the council, based upon recommendations 90 from the council and confirmed by the council. 91 (c) Representation. In selecting the membership of the commission, the mayor and president of the 92 council and the council shall take particular care to ensure that the commission is broadly 93 representative of racial, religious, gender and ethnic groups residing in the city. 94 (d) Holding other office; removal. No member of the commission shall hold any elected or 95 appointed office under the government of the United States or the state, county, or city, or be a 96 candidate for any such office. The mayor or the city council president may remove members of the 97 commission, with the concurrence of the city council, for substantial neglect of duty, or gross 98 misconduct in office. 99 (e) Terms of office; vacancies. A member of the commission shall be appointed for a term of office 100 of three years and until his successor has been appointed and has qualified. The appointees shall be 101 appointed for staggered terms of office. When a vacancy occurs in the membership of the 102 commission, it shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired portion of the term in the same 103 manner as the original appointment. 104 (f) Reappointments. Members may be reappointed. 105 ADOPTED: *

Proposed Ordinance #2010-23 - Requirement to Step Down When Running for Other Office Page 4 106 SYNOPSIS 107 This amendment would remove the requirement to step down when running for other office 108 from the Ethics Commission, Dover Human Relations Commission, and City Council 109 members. 110 Actions History 111 July 26, 2010 - Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee 112 S:\ORDINANCES\2010\Draft Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-23 - Chpt 30 - Requirement to Step Down - Running for Office 1ST RDG.wpd