Este texto se extrajo de el PDF de forma automática y puede contener errores. El PDF es el registro oficial, así que consúltelo antes de confiar en esto.
1 página tiene poco o ningún texto legible aquí, a menudo por ser escaneos o dibujos. Para verla, consulte el PDF.
Página 1
DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JUNE 22, 2011
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Present: Chair Roy Sudler, Jr. Commissioners Ellen Wasfi, Thomas Steele. Phyllis
Edamatsu arrived late.
Call to Order: Chair Sudler waited till 7:15 to call the meeting to order to see if
there would be enough commissioners present to constitute a quorum.
Comments from Members of the Community: Ms. Calmetta Brinkley from Mt.
Zion Church came forward to express concern about the graffiti that has been
appearing on buildings around Dover. Her Social Action Committee at the church
has some photos of the graffiti and they are concerned that it might be gang related.
Commissioner Wasfi asked her if they reported it to the Dover Police, and she
responded that they have not yet done so. Wasfi next asked if they brought it before
the City Council, and Ms. Brinkley said they had not gone there either.
Commissioner Wasfi then recommended that the church should send a letter to the
Dover Police, the City Council, and also to their District Representative,
Councilwoman Russell. She told her to enclose the photos, and ask if the police can
interpret the graffiti to connect it to gang activity, and if they have measures to
remove it from the buildings and clean it up. Chair Sudler asked in what area of
town the graffiti is located. Ms. Brinkley said they saw some on the side of a
building on Forrest Ave & Lincoln St. and also there were similar drawings
elsewhere. She indicated that the Commission was her first contact and now she
knew how to proceed in her inquiries. Commissioner Wasfi told her that if she does
not get a response from the Police or the City Council, to please return to the
Commission, and DHRC could make a recommendation to the City Council to
investigate further.
Agenda Additions/Deletions: There were no additions or deletions.
Adoption of Minutes: The Minutes from March 17, 2011 were adopted with no
corrections or additions. The Minutes from March 23, 2011 were corrected and
approved as amended. The Minutes from May 25, 2011 were corrected and
approved as amended.
Chair’s Report: Chair Sudler passed around a hand written letter (see Attachment
# 1) from Jeremy Kopp and Jackie Jones from 10 Mishoe St. Dover. They have a
complaint with the City of Dover’s Utility Customer Service employee, Corinne
Mosher. Chair Sudler is referring the matter to Commissioner Britt as head of the
Intake Screening Committee. Next Chair Sudler brought up the letter to the Mayor &
City Council dated May 25, 2011. The commissioners reviewed it and made
corrections. (Refer to Attachment # 2 of the May 25, 2011 Minutes). The
Commission will review and vote to send the letter at the next DHRC meeting.
Página 2
-2-
The Commissioners reviewed the Draft of the Annual Report. Several corrections
were made, and discussed. (Refer to Attachment # 4 from May 25, 2011 Minutes).
Chair Sudler said that Commissioner Britt has some things to add, and since she was
absent tonight, they should wait and be ready to discuss and vote on the final report
at the next meeting.
Committee Reports;
A. Intake Screening: Jeremy Kopp’s letter will be forwarded to Commissioner
Britt.
B. School Programs: Commissioner Wasfi said she has not had a meeting yet,
but will have a report as soon as she does.
C. Community Programs: Commissioner Pyne was absent.
D. Assessment: Commissioner Edamatsu said she is working on tallying the
responses from the Boys and Girls Club meeting, and will have a report ready
soon.
Unfinished Business:
A. Mental Health Forum Update: (See Attachment # 2) Commissioner Wasfi
circulated her draft of the letter, and a few corrections were made in the
wording. Then she suggested that the recommendations from Chair Sudler
should be incorporated into the draft (See Attachment # 3 from May 25, 2011
Minutes). At the next DHRC meeting it should be discussed and voted on
after all the commissioners have had a chance to view all the revisions.
B. Status of Slavery Apology: DRHC will be drafting a letter to the City Council
to follow up on the Apology for Slavery Resolution that was passed last year
by the City of Dover. It is unclear if the resolution was sent to the State
Legislature, and if so, what has become of it.
New Business: Commissioner Wasfi brought a report entitled “Spirituality and
Governance” (See Attachment # 3). The underlined sections of the report were
items that the commissioners discussed and reviewed. Commissioner Wasfi
suggested that the DHRC should have a public forum on Native American Indian
issues. She would invite the Native American Indians to help formulate the agenda,
and plan and host the meeting so that the public can learn more about their
concerns and issues. It was noted that the City Council, Dover State Representatives,
the Dover Post, State News, and various agencies from city and state government
should all be invited to attend. There are many points that could be incorporated
into a resolution that the DHRC could make on behalf of the Indians. Commissioner
Wasfi made a motion to investigate the possibility of holding a Forum for the Native
American Indians to discuss their concerns for fair treatment in city and state
government. Commissioner Steele seconded and the motion carried.
Página 3
-3-
Suggestions for Agenda Items for Future Meetings:
A. Finalize the Annual Report
B. Finish the Mental Health Forum Recommendations
C. Discuss having a Forum on Native American Indian Issues
D. Report on Boys and Girls Club Forum
Announcements:
A. There will be an African American Festival this Saturday at the Legislative
Mall. Headliner singer will be Sharon Katz from 6 to 8.
B. PBS recently interviewed Commissioner Edamatsu’s mother and sister for a
TV documentary on the Japanese interment camps during WWII.
Commissioner Edamatsu has a copy of the DVD.
Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 9:00.
Minutes taken and submitted by Mary Walson
Página 4
4'r-rAc.« M~tJl
::tr I
. ". '., ( .e 12~J2..0 i 1 1.-22-t/
d'ScV\2
\D
\~\=~~:.'
~l'-~
=4- GlCyrE'..
.. S+
~S
.
deLe, y'" . elL \ \ C\C'\I-"""Q_.
>I---J ~ _
2i'1~- 'W~?J--.33 ')'"8
Página 6
ATTAU M.£,ur -tt:" ~
~-;L).-Il
DRAFT
June 22, 2011
City Council President
Dover City Council
City Hall, Dover, DE 19903 .
Dear Council President:
On May 26, 2010, the Dover Human Relations Commission (DHRC) held a Mental
Health Forum in the Community Meeting Room at Dover Police Headquarters. This
event followed a proclamation, Mayas Mental Health Month, which was unanimously
approved by the Commission and issued by Mayor Carleton Carey. Please find enclosed
copies of the proclamation and the meeting minutes.
The stated purpose of the forum was to share experiences, concerns, knowledge, and
information about mental health issues. The event included professionals representing
advocacy and treatment organizations in the mental health field, such as PSI-Dover, the
Delaware Board of Mental Health, the Division of Substance Abuse for the State of
Delaware, and the National Alliance on Mental Issues. Additionally, both individuals
and fanlilies from the Dover community attended.
Unquestionably, the forum uncovered a number of challenges facing the mental health
field, which were articulated by various speakers; these are outlined below:
(1) Lack of coordination between stages of treatment for mental illness;
(2) The need for augmented mental health services, particularly for specific
groups like students and military veterans;
(3) Concern over violation of the rights of patients undergoing treatment,
including but not limited to unauthorized restraining of patients, denial
of medicine, and failure to inform caregivers or guardians about
changes in patient care;
(4) Inadequate training of some workers in the mental health field and a lack of
quality mental health professionals to make assessments of mental illness;
(5) Insufficient financial resources furnished to organizations and
agencies offering mental health services;
(6) Difficulty in locating information about various mental illnesses and
in securing assistance for sanle;
Página 7
(7) Regional disparities in mental health treatment;
(8) Overall lack of transparency and ~ccountability in administering regulations
governing treatment of mental health patients and their families.
As a path forward in addressing the aforementioned problems, the Commission
recommends that several actions be taken:
(1) Keep promoting the message that mental health is attainable;
(2) Institutionalize annual events concurrent with Mayas Mental Health Month;
(3) Simplify and expand outlets which provide information about mental health
facilities, services, and treatment;
(4) Appointment (if a mental health ombudsman, who could serve as a conduit
between local, county, or state government agencies on the one hand and
professional groups and patients on the other hand;
(5) Revi~present procedures which unfairly penalize the caregiver/guardian of
patients undergoing treatment;
(6) Establis_ a method of acknowledging and rewarding individuals and groups
which initiate projects aimed at treating or preventing mental illness or promoting
mental health;
(7) RegulaJ~valuatisft of performance of mental health staff and continuing education
opportunities for same, including periodic retraining and recertification of mental
health professionals and caregivers;
(8) Educa~ police about mental illness and how to properly handle individuals
displaying such traits;
(9) Creat~ a method for persons to report wrongdoing or violation of regulations in
the mental health field and ensuring protection for them.
(10) Recogni~regional disparities in the quality and availability of health care.
The Commission appreciates the participation of Councilman Thomas Leary at the
mental health forum. With the commitment of City Council as a whole, this issue will
receive the attention it deserves and the improvements necessary.
Thank you for your attention and consideration of these suggestions.
Página 8
4IT At-f! M <i1J r
1 =tr3
(;-)..)...-11
"SPIRITUALITY AND GOVERNANCE"
A Conference Presented by
The Interfaith Council of Central Delaware
And
Native American Tribal Leaders of Delaware
January 6, 2011
Christ Episcopal Church, Dover
In her introduction to the program, moderator Ellen Wasfi of the League of Women
Voters of Kent County raised the question of how ~al Native American tribes and their
ongoing contributions to American life can ~e better integrated and recognized by the
. State ofDelawar~. She highlighted the theme of "Spirituality and Governance," and
shared what she had learned from Lenape Chief Dennis Coker that in traditional Native
American culture, spirituality and governance were one and the same, involving
interaction with nature and treating fellow human beings with respect and friendship.
This spirituality guided relationships between individuals and communities without
formal governing structures until these were required in order to deal with state and
federal governments, especially with respect to land ownership. Today, the major issue of
"Governance" revolves around official state recognition oflocal Native American
communities. A parallel concern is the lack of ackllowled ment of trib Iidentit,
t roug out the state educational system where indigenous cultures and history have not
been adequately documented or appreciated.
The first speaker was Chief Dennis J. Coker, Chief of the Lenape Indian Tribe of
Delaware. Chief Coker pointed out that the Lenape were an aboriginal people of northern
Kent County who were still thriving intact as a native community. They insist upon
maintaining their status as a native people, and their religion is based on their symbiotic
relationship with Mother Earth which insures the survival of all of creation. Although
contemporary spirituality is now expressed primarily through Christian form of worship,
many in the native community still prefer traditional forms of worship. He reiterated the
confluence of governance and spirituality as respect for each other and the land. To adapt
to contemporary governance, the Lenape developed a constitution.
Chief Coker stressed that the State of Delaware's tacit recognition of the Lenape is
insufficient for the tribe to receive full government benefits. He brought this concern to
the attention of Governor Markell, and urged the governor to pay special attention to the
neglect of Native American history and culture in Delaware's educational system. He
also emphasized the critical role of the faith community in rectifying these wrongs. Other
issues that must be addressed include: 1) the need for an official disavowal by
contemporary Christian churches of the 15th-cen' Bull e Doctrin
Discovery, which laid the basis or t e.ilom:e.SSionand e·--1m
----_._. _C' __ .:_ •.
the Cath'OIlc colonial powers; and 2) the United States affirmation of the UN Declaration ...
~ the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the aim of which is the elimination of human rights.
violations against the planet's 370 million indillenous oeoole and assistinll them'
combating discrimmatIOn and marginalizatiQll._
Página 9
2
The second speaker was Chief Bill Daisey, Assistant Chief of the Nanticoke Indian Tribe
of Southern Delaware. Chief Daisey described the close relationship between the
Nanticoke and the Lenape, and expressed his concern that state census reports tried J9.
eliminate the category of Native American despite the tribes' existence in Delaware. He
criticized the fact that Native Americans in Delaware had reQeived inferior education due
to years of segregatioll. He revealed that in their need to adapt to the dominant culture,
Native Americans had to blend into the greater society in order to circumvent negative
media images and the fact that at times it was "dangerous" to be Native American. Indian
students were often ridiculed in the school environment for their heritage. He cited the
widespread belief held in the indigenous community that Delaware was reluctant to grant,
~de (legal) recognition to the Lenape and the Nanticoke because ofthe fear that once
such reco 'tion was granted, the tribes would qualify to receive fe eral recognitIOn 0
I eir nation status and woul t en be free to 0 en casinos w Ich w ete with the
.state's eXIstmg gam ling indust . He expressed hIS III Ignation that in order to be
counted in t e census, ative Americans had to prove their identity, a requirement that is
not applied to any other ethnic, racial or national group.
Chief Daisey repeated Chief Coker's description of the Native American relationship to
the land as an integral part of their spirituality, and the importance of not wasting
resources. He reiterated that Native American churches were diverse, blending
Christianity with traditional religion. He mentioned the annual Nanticoke Powwow:. in
Millsboro attended by 30,000, as a means of familiarizing the public with the traditions
and practices of Nanticoke culture as well as communicating Nanticoke traditions to th~
oun who face pressures of assimilation into the wi'de ciet. The preservation of
Nanticoke heritage is reflected m tee ort to retain their native language with its
Algonquin roots. The concern with not losing their heritage is critical in a society where
many believe and are taught that there are no Native Americans in Delaware.
The third speaker was Chief Mark "Quiet Hawk" Gould, Chief of the Lenni-Lenape
Indian Tribe of New Jersey. He referred to the Bible's teaching to love and respect as the
essence of governance. He also emphasized the need to preserve the Native American
heritage and to maintain communication between tribes. He pointed out that Delaware's
tribal genealogy is mixed due to generations of tribal intermarriage, and that tribes
needed unity to survive and counteract the forces pulling them apart, i.e., the lack of
support for their heritage in school or the workplace and the resultant fear of admitting
that heritage. In order to combat these centrifugal forces, Native Americans had to bring
Jesus Christ into the worship circle since the traditional church was no longer being
respected by all traditional peoples. Tribal members are now spread out among various,
mostly Protestant denominations (and some Catholic) which maintain a mutual respect
for each other's Christian beliefs. Chief Gould described the need to acknowledge Jesus
Christ in religious ceremonies in order to engender unity and to teach love and respect.
He concluded that although Native Americans are being listened to now more than
before, tIw-e still exists a mutual distrust between the Native American community and
~e governmen!:.. He stressed the need to forgive the past.
Página 10
3
The final Native American speaker was the Reverend John Norwood of the Sovereign
Nentego-Lenape Tribal Confederation. He confirmed that the Nanticoke and Lenape
were genealogically-linked tribes that collaborated on issues oftribal governance and
survived through informal family and tribal structures. They elect tribal councils that run
Native American affairs with a structure that ensures that neither member tribe dominates
the other. Member tribes have evolved a structure to adapt to governance and define the
scope of tribal authorities. They share the history of confederated tribes which is
preserved in expanding museums of Native American culture and history. The
Confederation Charter mandates that a prayer invoking the Creator's guidance begin
every meeting. While there is a strong Christian link between the tribes, there is no single
spiritual belief system and traditional values are expressed across tribes throughout the
country.
The first response to the concerns expressed by tribal leaders came from Debora Hansen,
Education Associate for Curriculum, Instruction, and the Professional Development
Working Group of the State Department of Education (DOE). She commented that the
national focus on education formed the backdrop for discussion with the goal of
improving educational outcomes for all children. She reviewed the development of New
Standards comprising the priorities of the State Department of Education which were
intended to fuse a common core of initiatives into the state's program and, thereby, blend
Native American concerns into the educational infrastructure. The standards were
developed by states across the country establishing learning targets. Ms Hansen reiterated
that this process created the opportunity for indigenous peoples to be incorporated into
the standards, known as the Delaware Prioritized Curriculum. She also cautioned that the
DE Department of Education was entering "uncharted waters" with its budget reduced by
one-third. The recent "Race to the Top" grant awarded to Delaware by the US
Government was a challenge to improve all levels of education for life after high school.
The final presentation was made by Dr. Steven Newton, History Department Interim
Chair and member of the Office of Community Relations and Organizational
Development at Delaware State University (DSU). In order to establish a plan of action,
Dr. Newton advocated inviting tribal leaders to the University to discuss issues of
upgrading the status of Delaware tribes and enhancing tribal leaders' ability to apply for")
federal Native American preservation grants. He estimated that ~9,OOO - $7~
grant funding was available. He indicated thatDSU could apply for grants on behalf of
the tribes. He also stated that mini-grants from the National Endowment for the
Humanities (NEH) were available for summer classroom workshops and that Native
American expertise was required to develop curriculum. DSU also expressed an interest
in discussing preservation projects and could make internships available to research local
history. The point is to bring education to local communities which have been locked out.
Dr. Newton also indicated that the New Jersey tribes would be included and that it was
important to emphasize what we share as a community and to move from conversations
to work.
In the discussion that followed the presentations, Chief Coker stated that the DSU
initiative was long overdue and welcome. Many Native Americans never attended high
lr------__ ~_-
Página 11
4
school and it was extremely important to get the youth involved in projects of
sustainability, e.g., returning to the traditional diet to improve health, reemphasizing the
Lenape farming tradition, restoring the Lenape language and refamiliarizing children
with techniques that enable them to move into a sustainable future. Chief Daisey recalled
that the previous generation was denied a high school education, and that education
proved inferior even after integration with limited and often primitive facilities. Chief
Gould cited his work with the New Jersey Office of Indian Affairs in changing the
content of what is being taught in public schools, i.e., bringing Indian education into the
present in order to depict an accurate picture of the history of local tribes, e.g., why
massacres occurred.
When queried on the specific nature of the DOE focus on indigenous people, Ms Hansen
admitted that the DOE has no programs in the pipeline geared specifically to Native
Americans but she agreed bring this need to the attention of the Secretary of Education,
with special focus on the initial exposure to Delaware history in the fourth grade. She
cited the opportunity for using the visual arts and appreciated the opportunities opening
up to collaborate with institutions of higher education. She further suggested that such
curriculum initiatives be developed at the local level and cited the example of the
Nanticoke Powwow as an opportunity to insert local content into the standard of
"Celebrations. "
Dr. Newton commented that it was insufficient simply to change curriculum. It was
necessary to use federal grant money to create multimedia resources for teachers, citing
the Sojourner Project in New Jersey as an example. All schools and teachers in the state
should have access to these resources. He added that DSU is in a position to identify such
resources as it has done with African-American studies. It is important to encourage
institutional involvement in the pursuit of funding for these projects.
RuthAnn Purchase, coordinator of the day's event, provided all the guest speakers with
publications detailing highlights of Delaware's Native American culture, including a
poster that featured a stone tablet engraved with a quote in the Munsee dialect of the
Lenape language taken from a Civil Rights Monument in Ontario, Canada. The quote
included the words for "Civil Rights" translated literally as: Equity {To treat one another_
the same), Dignity (Pride in Onesel and Ri hts Hone t Heart Ms Purchase suggested
that t IS ta et be replicated in Dover, Delaware. Ms Purchase also expressed the
appreciation of all the attendees to Jeanine Kleimo and Ted and Mary Torsch for
arranging the Christ Episcopal Church venue to host the event.
Moderator Ellen Wasfi also thanked the program organizers, presenters and the audience
for their enthusiastic participation, and concluded by urging local faith institutions to
pursue within their religious communities the formal disavowal of the Doctrine of
. Discovery as a step towards the restoration of justice. She also encouraged all those in
attendance to press their state and federal representatives to join the rest of the global
community in affirming the principles of the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples .
.
Página 12
Page 1 of 1
Subj: Delaware National Coastal Heritage Park
Date: 2/18/2011 3:26:47 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From: EWasfi@aol.com
To: larry.windly@carper.senate.gov
Dear Senator Carper:
Earlier this week, I spoke with Olivia in your Capitol Hill office about your proposal for a Delaware
National Coastal Heritage Park. Although the proposal contains the following language, "Delaware is
rich with the history of Native American tribes such as the Nanticoke and Lenni Lenape," there does not
appear to be rovision in the themes section for a specific area devote ative American
. n my view, it would be a travesty to de Ica e suc an historical monument to the early
Swedish, Finnish and Dutch settlers without also honoring the heritage and legacy of the Native
American tribes who were the earliest 'inhabitants of what eventually became the State of Delaware,
and whose descendents continue to reside in the State and the region.
On January 6, 2011, the Interfaith Council of Central Delaware and the Native American Tribal Leaders
of Delaware cosponsored a forum entitled, "Spirituality and Governance." I am attaching the summary
of the conference, which was held in Dover, and which presented the views and concerns of
Delaware's Native American leaders, as well as the responses of representatives from the Delaware
Department of Education and Delaware State University. Although the conference did not touch
specifically on the Park proposal, Native American concerns about their history and contributions
being better integrated and recognized throughout Delaware's educational system should be
considered when planning a project of this historical significance. I hope you will incorporate their views
and perspectives as you proceed with plans to create the Delaware Coastal Heritage Park. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Ellen O. Wasfi
286 Pine Valley Road
Dover, DE 19904-7111
(302) 734-1545
Wednesday, June 22, 2011 AOL: EWasfi