packet

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA March 14, 2011 - 7:30 P.M. - Council Chambers - City Hall - City of Dover OPEN FORUM - 15 MINUTES PRIOR TO OFFICIAL MEETING (7:15 P.M.) The “Open Forum” segment is provided to extend the opportunity to the general public to share their questions, thoughts, comments, concerns, and complaints. Discussion of any item appearing on the agenda is prohibited and citizen comments are limited to three (3) minutes. Council is prohibited from taking action since they are not in official session; however, they may schedule such items as regular agenda items and act upon them in the future. INVOCATION BY MONSIGNOR DANIEL McGLYNN, HOLY CROSS CHURCH (GUEST OF COUNCILMAN McGIFFIN) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILWOMAN WILLIAMS AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS * CONSENT AGENDA Those items on the Council Agenda which are considered routine and non-controversial shall be marked with an asterisk (*) and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. * 1. Adoption of Minutes A. Council Retreat of January 28, 2011 B. Regular Council Meeting of February 28, 2011 2. Proclamations A. Earth Hour B. Fix-a-Leak Week 3. Presentation - Police Department Annual Report 4. Public Hearing/Final Reading - Proposed Ordinance #2011-03 - 2011 Amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan The First Reading of the following proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of January 24, 2011. Copies of the proposed ordinance are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers. A. Ordinance #2011-03 Amending the 2008 Comprehensive Plan by replacing Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix and Map 12-1: Land Development Plan.

Council Agenda - March 14, 2011 Page 2 5. Public Hearing/Final Reading - Rezoning A. Proposed Ordinance #2011-05 - Rezoning of Property located at 101-405 Doveview Drive (Doveview Apartments), owned by CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC and SunTrust Bank, consisting of 6.735+/- acres. The property is currently zoned IO (Institutional and Office) and subject to COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning is RG-5 (General Residence Zone for Mid-Rise Apartments) and subject to COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The property is located on the north side of Forrest Avenue (Route 8) just west of the Saulsbury Road intersection. (T AX P ARCEL: ED05-076.07-01-30.00-000; F IR ST C O U N CIL D ISTRIC T ; P LAN N IN G R EFEREN CE : Z-11-03). The First Reading of the proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of January 24, 2011. * 6. Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Report - February 23, 2011 A. Request for Waiver of Land Subdivision Regulations - Reduction of Street Right-of-Way Width - Dover High School Project (South Side of Forrest Avenue) (Committee Recommended that the Request Be Referred Back to the Planning Commission for Further Study and Clarification of the Following: Actual Reasons for Narrowing the Roadway to 50 Feet, a Deeper Look into Pedestrian and Bicycle Traffic and Ingress and Egress to the School, and Serious Consideration of Developing a Good, Practical Plan for a Roadway to Hazletteville Road) B. Discussion - Crossover Bridge for Pedestrians at the New Dover High School (Committee Action Not Required) C. Briefing on Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) Projects (Committee Action Not Required) D. Briefing on Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Projects (Committee Action Not Required) E. Proposed Ordinance #2011-06 Amending Chapter 46 - Fire Prevention and Protection - Open Burning (See Item #11-A) (Committee Recommended Adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2011-06) * 7. Utility Committee Report - February 28, 2011 A. Yard Waste Collection Program (Committee Recommended Endorsement of the Yard Waste Separation Plan) B. Generation Revenue Forecast (Committee Action Not Required) C. Power Plant FY 2012 Capital Investment Plan (CIP) Review (Deferred by Committee Due to Time Constraints) D. 2012-2016 Utility Capital Investment Plan (CIP) (Deferred by Committee Due to Time Constraints) E. PACE/NAES Monthly Report (December) (Deferred by Committee Due to Time Constraints)

Council Agenda - March 14, 2011 Page 3 * 8. Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report - February 28, 2011 A. Review and Recommendation - Filling Critical Positions (Committee Action Not Required) B. Latest Estimate (LE) for Fiscal Year 2011 Budget (See Item #11-B) (Committee Recommended Acceptance of the Latest Estimate (LE) for Fiscal Year 2011 Budget Report) (Committee Recommended Instituting a Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) to Use $1.4M, Applied over 15 Months, Effective with All Bills Billed on or after April 1, 2011) C. Proposed Ordinance #2011-07 Amending Chapter 46 - Fire Prevention and Protection, Article III - Fire Codes, Section 46-126 - Fire Prevention Permit and Appendix F - Fees and Fines (See Item #11-C) (Committee Recommended Adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2011-07 Amending Chapter 46 Fire Prevention and Protection, Article III - Fire Codes, Section 46-126 - Fire Prevention Permits and Amendments to Appendix F - Fees and Fines) D. Review of Hospitality and Civic Function Policy (Committee Deferred Until the Next Meeting) * 9. Monthly Reports - January 2011 A. Budget Report B. Chief of Police Report C. City Assessor’s Report D. City Manager’s Report E. City Planner’s Report F. Dover Fire Department Report G. Capital Investment Plan (CIP) Report 10. Setting of Property Assessment Appeals 11. First Reading - Proposed Ordinances The First Reading is offered on the following proposed ordinances. Final action by Council will take place during the Second Reading of the ordinances on March 28, 2011. Copies of all proposed ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. A. Proposed Ordinance #2011-06 Amending Chapter 46 - Fire Prevention and Protection - Open Burning (Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee) B. Proposed Ordinance #2011-09 - 2011 Budget Revisions (Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee) C. Proposed Ordinance #2011-07, with Staff Amendment #1, Amending Chapter 46 - Fire Prevention and Protection, Article III - Fire Codes, Section 46-126 - Fire Prevention Permit and Appendix F - Fees and Fines (Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee) 12. Council Members Announcements /tm S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Council-Agendas\2011\03-14-2011.wpd THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.

COUNCIL RETREAT The Council Retreat was held on January 28, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. with Council President Hogan presiding. Council members present were Mr. Bonar, Mr. Leary, Mr. McGiffin, Dr. McGlumphy (departed at 2:45 p.m.) , Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Russell, Mr. Salters, and Mrs. Williams (arrived at 9:14 a.m. and departed at 2:45 p.m.) . Mayor Carey was also present. Council staff members present were Mrs. Mitchell, Mrs. Townshend, Mr. DePrima, Mrs. McDowell, and Ms. Devine. Mrs. Tieman was also present. INTRODUCTION AND WARM UP - WHY ARE WE HERE? Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, reviewed a Presentation - Why Are We Here? (Exhibit #1), noting that members would have the opportunity to validate the City’s Vision, Critical Success Factors, and Mission Statement; validate current and pending initiatives; and discuss budgetary goals. He reminded members that last year’s Retreat was different from previous sessions since it strictly focused on the City’s budget; however, staff requested that this year, as in previous sessions, members brainstorm/develop new ideas and programs for upcoming years. In addition to reviewing accomplishments and setting priorities for the City’s future, Mr. DePrima stated that, similar to last year, staff would be presenting an estimate for next year’s budget, emphasizing that this would be an early estimate that would allow Council the opportunity to provide staff direction. He advised members that Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Treasurer/Controller, would be presenting options for financing capital projects. Mr. DePrima stated that, later in the day, members would have the opportunity to review the City’s Mission Statement to determine if revisions are necessary. WHERE HAVE WE BEEN? At the request of Mr. DePrima, members relayed their perceptions of City accomplishments during the previous year, as follows: 1) improved snow removal plan (DePrima); 2) improved development of downtown (Salters); 3) significant improvement in reliability of electric service (McGlumphy); 4) better public notification - weather (Russell); 5) Solar Park - first tenant Garrison Park (Ruane); 6) completion of Governors Avenue (Ruane); 7) reassessment (Ruane); 8) bond rating improvements - all funds upgraded (Ruane); 9) Transit Center (Ruane); 10) police response/domestic violence (McGiffin); 11) progress on the new library (Hogan); 12) improvement in customer service by Planning/Inspections (Hogan); 13) improvement in “slum” landlord enforcement (McGiffin); 14) improvement in Planning - quicker process (Hogan); 15) environmental stewardship - Cool Cities, LED lights, change of fuel, etc. (Ruane); 16) proactive response by City Manager and Public Services Director - abandoned developments (Ruane); 17) improved e-services (Hogan); 18) quarterly newsletter (Russell); 19) employee cooperation (furloughs, hiring freeze, etc.) in difficult times (Ruane); 20) implementation of recycling program (McGiffin); 21) downtown security cameras (Mayor); 22) Youth Advisory Committee (Russell); 23) starting up Health Benefits Committee (DePrima); 24) Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB)/City policy compliance (Leary); 25) fewer brown water complaints in the 3rd District (McGiffin); 26) completion of Route 13 sewer interceptor (Ruane); 27) commitment to fixing infrastructure - water/sewer (Ruane); 28) Interfaith Homeless Shelter - community spirit (Russell); 29) downtown merchant/police cooperation (Mayor); and 30) increasing professional development/certification (Ruane).

COUNCIL RETREAT OF JANUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 2 By unanimous consent, members took a brief recess. Meeting recessed at 9:50 a.m. and reconvened at 10:04 a.m. WHERE ARE WE GOING? At the request of Mr. DePrima, members relayed ideas that they felt the City should consider for the future, as follows: Broad Outcomes 1. Improve Public Safety - Gang Activity (McGiffin) 2. Keep Up to Date with Enforcement of Abandoned Properties (Leary) 3. Keep Revenues Up with Costs (Ruane) 4. Continue Updating and Improving the Charter (Hogan) 5. Increase and Intensify Economic Development Initiatives (Bonar) 6. Improve/Mend Relationships - Kent County, Chambers of Commerce, Kent County Partnership, State of Delaware, etc. (Williams) 7. Secure Electric Generation - Next 20 Years (Ruane) 8. Secure Ownership of Electric System (Bonar) 9. Strategic Funding of Economic Development (Mayor Carey) 10. Continue/Increase Support of Cultural Arts (Salters) 11. Contain Cost to Meet the Current Revenue Base (Williams) 12. Continue Efforts to Meet/Change the Pension/OPEB (Ruane) 13. Increase Affordable Housing (Ruane) 14. Create Partnership with County for Joint Programs (Hogan) 15. Contain the Size of City Government (Williams) 16. Stop Continued Duplication of Services (Williams) 17. County Property Tax Relief for City Residents (Ruane) Specific Actions/Programs/Projects 1. Continue Pressing of West Dover Connector (Ruane) 2. Support Youth Mentoring (Salters) 3. Recreation - Support Youth Development (Salters) 4. Increase Police to Appropriate Level (Salters) 5. Implement Recommendations of Joint Legislative, Finance, and Administration and Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee (Hogan) 6. Support Family Support Programs (Russell) 7. Stay Fully Compliant with Current Financial Standards/Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB)/City Policies (Leary) 8. Local Delaware Economic and Financial Advisory Council (DEFAC) Group (Ruane) 9. Go to Accurate Multi-year Budgeting (Ruane) 10. Collaborate More with Delaware Economic Development Office (DEDO), League of Local Governments, and Kent County (Bonar) 11. Amend Charter to Address Annexation of Enclaves (Hogan) 12. Re-examine the Authority and Scope of the Historic District Commission (Leary)

COUNCIL RETREAT OF JANUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 3 13. Create a Strategic Loan Fund for Economic Development (Carey) 14. Review the Dover Housing Authority and Its Relationship to the City (Salters) 15. Ensure Fair and Impartial Redistricting (Ruane) 16. Re-examine Consent Decree on Minority District (Ruane) 17. Reduce Tax Delinquency - Step up Tax Sales (Bonar) 18. Improve Minority Recruitment Efforts (Salters) 19. Complete the Library (Ruane) 20. Support Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Programs (Russell) 21. Address Issues/Provide Remedies for Abandoned Developments - Utility Committee Recommendation (Ruane) 22. Establish Random Drug Testing Program for All Employees (Russell) 23. Establish an Ethics Hotline (Leary) 24. Review Council Benefits (Salters) 25. Explore Term Limits for Members of Council (Hogan) 26. Explore Length of Terms for Members of Council (Bonar) 27. Present State Legislation to Implement Local Service Function Budget for Kent County (Ruane) By unanimous consent, members took a brief recess. Meeting recessed at 10:50 a.m. and reconvened at 11:11 a.m. WHAT ARE OUR PRIORITIES GIVEN THE CURRENT FISCAL CONDITION? In reviewing the ideas developed by members, Mr. DePrima requested that each member indicate their priorities by selecting six (6) of the 17 ideas listed under “Broad Outcomes” and nine (9) from the 27 “Specific Actions/Programs/Projects” list. (Members voted from 11:14 a.m. to 11:23 a.m.) Upon completion of the ranking exercise, Mr. DePrima advised members that the City Clerk’s Office would type the lists (2011 Council Retreat Votes) (Exhibit #2) and provide them to members of Council. Mr. DePrima stated that he and Mrs. McDowell, City Clerk, would review the prioritization list. He noted that some of the ideas would be relatively easy to implement; therefore, some ideas that were not highly ranked will be addressed. Mr. DePrima advised members that the prioritization list will be provided to department heads to obtain their feedback. He stated that some items may be referred to the appropriate committee for review and recommendation to City Council. Mr. DePrima indicated that some of the “broader” items would require more thought and time for consideration. Glancing at the rankings for the “Broad Outcomes,” Mr. DePrima noted that Items #1, #8, #12, #10, and #11 were ranked highly, and Items #1, #18, #15, #16, and #7 were ranked highly on the “Specific Actions/Programs/Projects” list. He reiterated that items that received only a few votes would not automatically be discounted.

COUNCIL RETREAT OF JANUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 4 ARE THESE STATEMENTS STILL VALID? Mr. DePrima requested that members review the City’s Mission Statement, Vision, and Critical Success Factors for possible revision. Mission Statement In reviewing Page 3 of Exhibit #1 - Why Are We Here?, Mr. DePrima questioned if any changes to the City’s Mission Statement were needed. He advised members that the current Mission Statement is as follows: It shall be the mission of the City of Dover to advance the following policies and projects however and whenever possible: Quality of Life Establish a Regional Library in Dover Promote Homeownership and Affordable Housing Strengthen Property Maintenance and Enforcement Support the Building of the Inner City Cultural Center Infrastructure Maintain and Improve the City’s Infrastructure and Implement Brown Water Solutions Implement Plan to secure Electric Generation for the Next 20 Years Economic Development Implement Economic Development Strategy (Garrison Tract Development and Downtown) Council President Hogan suggested the addition of a general statement such as “Improving Public Safety” to the Quality of Life category. Mr. Ruane noted that the meaning of Infrastructure is not clearly explained, and suggested the addition of Road and Transportation Improvements, which are critical to the City’s infrastructure. Vision There were no changes suggested for the City’s Vision, which reads as follows: “The City of Dover is a place where people want to live! Through the team effort of its elected officials, employees, and citizens, Dover is a clean and safe community with a future of balanced growth and opportunity where all citizens are heard, enjoy a high quality of life, and diversity is valued.” Critical Success Factors Mr. Bonar suggested that staff “wordsmith” the Critical Success Factors to create an acronym for a word such as “success,” “capital,” or “relocate,” which would provide the City with a tool to improve its image.

COUNCIL RETREAT OF JANUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 5 The City’s Critical Success Factors were stated, as follows: With these, we can achieve our Vision . . . Customer Satisfaction and Effective Community Communication Employee Satisfaction and Effective Employee Communication Cost and Revenue Efficiency Improve Downtown and Surrounding Neighborhoods City Wide Safety Economic Development and Job Growth Dr. McGlumphy suggested that the Critical Success Factors relate to the Vision Statement, noting that the phrase “diversity is valued” is included in the City’s Vision; however, there is no mention of this in the Critical Success Factors. He suggested that diversity be added, explaining that the City’s workforce should be representative of the City’s community. Mr. Ruane suggested that the word “performance” be included in the sentence “Employee Satisfaction and Effective Employee Communication.” He also felt that the phrase “Cost and Revenue Efficiency” is too narrow. Mr. Leary felt that diversity is a global issue that pertains to economic development in the entire community. He suggested that all sectors of the community should have the ability to participate and that a general tone and tenor be set to encourage diversity as it relates to the economic environment. By unanimous consent, members took a recess for lunch. Meeting recessed at 11:59 a.m. and reconvened at 1:04 p.m. THE NEXT BUDGET Mr. DePrima reviewed a Presentation of the City’s Budget (Exhibit #3) and re-emphasized that the version of the budget presented was very preliminary and is intended only to be used as a tool. Responding to Mrs. Williams regarding the salary increase assumptions, Mr. DePrima stated that salaries were based on an average of the union contracts plus an additional 1% for pay-for-performance. Mr. DePrima noted that the additional $619,029 in revenues is the result of additional funds from the red light photo enforcement program and franchise fees. He stated that the estimated transfer tax is projected at $1.4M for this year and $1M for next year. In response to Mrs. Williams, Mr. DePrima confirmed that staff will limit the Capital Investment Program (CIP’s) to the $1M projected revenue. In order to accomplish this, he noted that some projects, such as parks and playground maintenance and splash pad design, have been deferred. Dr. McGlumphy requested that staff provide a list of projects that have been deferred.

COUNCIL RETREAT OF JANUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 6 Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Mitchell stated that none of the models have been updated for utility revenues or expenses to determine if the City meets bond covenants. She reminded members that the models presented last year included assumptions for the “out” years. Mrs. Mitchell requested guidance regarding those assumptions, explaining that annual department expenses were set at 3.5%, retiree medical insurance was set at 6%, etc. She explained that staff would like direction as to whether members of Council feel that these assumptions should remain the same. Mr. Bonar requested that staff provide members with the most recent assumptions to help determine if there should be a change in this regard. Referring to the estimated percentages for rate increases, Mr. Ruane requested that, in addition to the percentages, staff provide actual amounts, which he felt would provide a better understanding. Mrs. Williams referred to the Kent County Sewer Treatment Adjustment and requested that staff provide members with the number and percentage of pipes that have been repaired/replaced. Responding, Mr. DePrima indicated that, although there have been several sewer pipes replaced, the actual pipe repair/replacement program will begin in February. Mr. DePrima encouraged members to consider ways in which the City can become less dependent on projected transfers and instead, relate its capital expenses to money already collected from the previous year (referred to as the “Seaford Method”). He explained that when transfer tax first began in Seaford, it was not utilized during the year it was collected and, from that point on, the City of Seaford began basing capital expenses on the amount of transfer tax received. He noted that Mrs. Mitchell would discuss this approach during a presentation to be provided later in the session. Responding to Mrs. Russell regarding Pay-As-You-Go Water Load Station (Customer Service) on Page 12 of Exhibit #3 - Presentation of the City’s Budget, Mr. DePrima stated that there is a pipe near the City’s Warehouse that contractors utilize to fill-up tank trucks with water for their projects. He indicated that, currently, there is an honor system in place and no way for the City to ensure that the water is being paid for. Mrs. Tieman explained that a meter is going to be installed that will require payment prior to water being released. In response to Mr. Salters, Mayor Carleton Carey explained that he has tried to secure grants for Downtown Security Cameras for the last three (3) years. He stated that the first cameras were funded by unexpended Parking Authority funds. He also reminded members that he has maintained a reduced budget the last two years but has continued to add cameras in critical locations with the available funds. Referring to Page 13 of Exhibit #3 - Presentation of the City’s Budget, Mrs. Tieman noted that the Generator for Public Services - Life Safety, in the amount of $17,500, has been removed. Mr. DePrima reviewed the Budget Model (Exhibit #4) and reminded members that it included large assumptions but that changes could be made.

COUNCIL RETREAT OF JANUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 7 Council President Hogan requested that staff include another column, modeled with the transfer at $7.25M, with the next column being the $8.856M. In addition, he requested that staff make corrections so that all columns extend across into the blue lines for consistency. Mr. Ruane suggested that the model include alternatives for the use of the transfer tax for Council’s consideration. Elaborating on the request of Council President Hogan, Mr. Leary suggested that a column be added that would represent the amounts required by policy to include expenses (actuarial recommendations) as well as revenues. Responding, Mr. DePrima stated that staff could develop a Budget Model to reflect policy only, with no assumptions (Full Policy Run). Responding to Dr. McGlumphy, Mr. DePrima explained that the base budget is $38M, which does not include property tax increases, and that the model provides different scenarios for Council’s consideration and direction. By unanimous consent, members took a brief recess. Meeting recessed at 2:45 p.m. and reconvened at 3:01 p.m. FINANCING CAPITAL PROJECTS Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, reviewed a Presentation of Capital Project Financing - Governmental Funds (Exhibit #5). Responding to Council President Hogan, Mrs. Mitchell confirmed her opinion that the City should consider utilizing bond issues to complete capital projects. In addition to the $1.3M that is currently required for the Library Project, it was her feeling that other projects, such as infrastructure and streets, could benefit from this approach. Mrs. Mitchell explained that there are issuance costs on every debt service; therefore, the City must be sure to receive all benefits for the costs of the bond issue. In response to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Mitchell stated that due to the current interest rates and the economic environment, this would be an ideal time to consider a bond issue, and suggested a minimum of $3M for such a bond issue. Mr. DePrima noted that, although some funds are provided by legislators for street improvements, there are several main roadways in need of repair, and he felt that a bond issue could help the City complete these projects as well as a number of building projects, including renovations to the Council Chambers to make it handicapped accessible. Responding to Council President Hogan, Mrs. Mitchell stated that her recent calculations, based on the annual debt service, revealed that the amount of bonds that can be issued is limited to $7.2M.

COUNCIL RETREAT OF JANUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 8 After much discussion, it was the consensus of members that staff should formulate a recommendation regarding a bond issue to be presented to the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee during their second meeting in March. By unanimous consent, Council President Hogan declared the meeting adjourned. Meeting adjourned at 3:28 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Kenneth L. Hogan Council President KLH/JG/tm/js/dd/ac S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Council-Minutes\2011\01-28-2011 RETREAT.wpd Exhibits Exhibit #1 - Presentation - Why Are We Here? (Attached to Original Minutes and File Copy) Exhibit #2 - 2011 Council Retreat Votes Exhibit #3 - Presentation of the City’s Budget (Attached to Original Minutes and File Copy) Exhibit #4 - Budget Model (Attached to Original Minutes and File Copy) Exhibit #5 - Presentation - Capital Project Financing - Governmental Funds (Attached to Original Minutes and File Copy)

EXHIBIT #2 Council Retreat of 01/28/2011 2011 COUNCIL RETREAT VOTES BROAD - OUTCOMES # OF ITEM # VOTES FOR VOTES DESCRIPTION OF PRIORITY Bonar, Carey, Hogan, McGiffin, McGlumphy, 1 8 Improve Public Safety - Gang Activity Russell, Salters, Williams Keep Up to Date with Enforcement of Abandoned 2 2 Leary, Ruane Properties 3 1 Keep Revenues up with Costs McGiffin Bonar, Hogan, 4 4 Continue Updating and Improving the Charter McGiffin, Russell Increase and Intensify Economic Development 5 Initiatives Improve/Mend Relationships - Kent County, Bonar, Carey, Leary, 6 5 Chambers of Commerce, Kent County Partnership, McGlumphy, Williams State of Delaware, etc. Carey, Hogan, McGiffin, Ruane, 7 7 Secure Electric Generation - Next 20 Years Russell, Salters, Williams 8 1 Secure Ownership of Electric System Williams 9 Strategic Funding of Economic Development Carey, McGiffin, 10 5 Continue/Increase Support of Cultural Arts McGlumphy, Russell, Salters Bonar, Carey, Leary, 11 6 Contain Cost to Meet the Current Revenue Base McGlumphy, Ruane, Williams Bonar, Carey, Hogan, Leary, McGiffin, 12 9 Continue Efforts to Meet/Change the Pension/OPEB McGlumphy, Ruane, Russell, Salters 13 1 Increase Affordable Housing Ruane

2011 COUNCIL RETREAT VOTES PAGE 2 # OF ITEM # VOTES FOR VOTES DESCRIPTION OF PRIORITY 14 2 Create Partnership with County for Joint Programs Hogan, Salters Hogan, Leary, 15 4 Contain the Size of City Government McGlumphy, Salters Bonar, Leary, Russell, 16 4 Stop Continued Duplication of Services Williams 17 1 County Property Tax Relief for City Residents Ruane SPECIFIC ACTIONS/PROGRAMS/PROJECTS # OF ITEM # VOTES DESCRIPTION OF PRIORITY VOTES FOR Bonar, Carey, Hogan, McGiffin, Ruane, 1 8 Continue Pressing of West Dover Connector Russell, Salters, Williams Bonar, Carey, 2 5 Support Youth Mentoring McGiffin, McGlumphy, Salters 3 2 Recreation - Support Youth Development Salters, Williams Bonar, Carey, Leary, 4 6 Increase Police to Appropriate Level McGlumphy, Ruane, Williams Implement Recommendations of Joint Legislative, McGiffin, Ruane, 5 3 Finance, and Administration and Safety Advisory and Williams Transportation Committee 6 1 Support Family Support Programs Williams Bonar, Carey, Hogan, Stay Fully Compliant with Current Financial Leary, McGlumphy, 7 8 Standards/Government Accounting Standards Board Russell, Salters, (GASB)/City Policies Williams Local Delaware Economic and Financial Advisory 8 Council (DEFAC) Group

2011 COUNCIL RETREAT VOTES PAGE 3 # OF ITEM # VOTES DESCRIPTION OF PRIORITY VOTES FOR 9 2 Go to Accurate Multi-year Budgeting McGlumphy, Ruane Collaborate More with Delaware Economic 10 2 Development Office (DEDO), League of Local McGlumphy, Salters Governments, and Kent County 11 Amend Charter to Address Annexation of Enclaves Re-examine the Authority and Scope of the Historic 12 2 Hogan, Leary District Commission Create Strategic Loan Fund for Economic 13 1 Carey Development Review the Dover Housing Authority and It’s 14 2 Hogan, Leary Relationship to the City Bonar, Carey, Hogan, Leary, McGiffin, 15 9 Ensure Fair and Impartial Redistricting Ruane, Russell, Salters, Williams Carey, Leary, 16 5 Re-examine Consent Decree on Minority District McGiffin, Ruane, Russell 17 Reduce Tax Delinquency - Step up Tax Sales Bonar, Carey, Leary, McGiffin, 18 8 Improve Minority Recruitment Efforts McGlumphy, Russell, Salters, Williams Bonar, Hogan, McGiffin, 19 6 Complete the Library McGlumphy, Ruane, Russell 20 Support Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Programs Bonar, Carey, Address Issues/Provide Remedies for Abandoned McGiffin, 21 6 Developments - Utility Committee Recommendation McGlumphy, Ruane, Williams

2011 COUNCIL RETREAT VOTES PAGE 4 # OF ITEM # VOTES DESCRIPTION OF PRIORITY VOTES FOR Establish Random Drug Testing Program for All 22 1 Russell Employees Hogan, Leary, 23 5 Establish an Ethics Hotline McGiffin, Russell, Salters 24 2 Review Council Benefits Russell, Salters 25 2 Explore Term Limits for Members of Council Bonar, Hogan 26 1 Explore Length of Terms for Members of Council McGlumphy Present State Legislation to Implement Local Service 27 3 Hogan, Leary, Ruane Function Budget for Kent County /jg/dd S:\ATTAC HM EN TS & EX HIBITS\C ouncil Exhibits\2011 Exhibits\01-28-2011\01-28-2011-2 C O U N C IL R ETR EAT - V otes.w pd

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING The Regular Council Meeting was held on February 28, 2011 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Hogan presiding. Council members present were Mr. Bonar, Mr. McGiffin, Dr. McGlumphy, Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Russell, Mr. Salters, and Mrs. Williams. Mr. Leary was absent. Council staff members present were Police Chief Hosfelt, Ms. Russell, Mrs. Townshend, Fire Chief Fortney (arrived at 8:09 p.m.), Mr. DePrima, City Solicitor Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Mrs. Mitchell was absent. Mayor Carey was present. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Hogan declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council was not in official session and could not take formal action. Mr. N. C. Vasuki, 235 Carnoustie Road, stated that Delaware Today magazine has ranked the City of Dover as the second best place to live in Delaware, second only to Lewes. Mr. Jeffrey Lank, on behalf of Eric Riddle of the Dover Jaycees, stated that this organization is very active in the community and is looking forward to working with the City of Dover, as they have in the past. The invocation was given by Chaplain Dixon, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. McGiffin moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mrs. Williams and unanimously carried. Mrs. Williams moved for approval of the Consent Agenda, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 14, 2011 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 14, 2011 were unanimously approved by motion of Mrs. Williams, seconded by Mr. Bonar and bore the written approval of Mayor Carey. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 2011-03 APPROVING ALLEY ABANDONMENT (IMPROVED) - ADJACENT TO 514 EAST LOOCKERMAN STREET AND 222 SOUTH DUPONT HIGHWAY - HUB ASSOCIATES, LLC AND A & G KRAMEDAS ASSOCIATES A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider abandonment of a portion of an improved alley located adjacent to 514 East Loockerman Street and 222 South DuPont Highway, owned by HUB Associates, LLC and A & G Kramedas Associates. Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, explained that the request is for abandonment of an improved alley. The abandonment was considered by the Planning Commission on December 20, 2010 and the Utility Committee on January 24, 2011. The Planning Commission and Utility Committee recommended approval of the requested abandonment, stipulating that utility easements be reserved for the City.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 2 Council President Hogan declared the public hearing open. Mr. Gregg Moore, Becker Morgan Group, on behalf of the applicant, HUB Associates, LLC, stated that the request for abandonment was submitted as part of a planned major renovation to the property. Mrs. Thelma Johnson, 512 East Loockerman Street, stated that her property is affected by the abandonment. She noted that, since the abandonment is for the benefit of HUB Associates, LLC, they should be responsible for paying the $125 fee to record her new deed. Council President Hogan declared the public hearing closed. Responding to Mr. Salters, Mr. Moore stated that the applicant would be willing to pay the $125 fee for the recordation of Mrs. Johnson’s deed. Mr. McGiffin moved for approval of the request to abandon a portion of an improved alley located adjacent to 514 East Loockerman Street and 222 South DuPont Highway, owned by HUB Associates, LLC and A & G Kramedas Associates. The motion was seconded by Mr. Salters and, by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent), Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-03, as follows: A RESOLUTION VACATING AND ABANDONING A CERTAIN ALLEY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DOVER. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: Section 1. The Council of the City of Dover hereby vacates and abandons the following alley: Being all that certain piece or parcel of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware, being an improved public alley running east to west, lying on the southerly side of and running parallel to East Loockerman Street, said portion of alley beginning at a point identified as the southeast corner of 516 East Loockerman Street, parcel #ED-05-077.06-01-63.00; thence running west toward Bayard Avenue, South 57 degrees 11 minutes 46 seconds West 213.78 feet along the northwest line of said 15’ wide alley but stopping at the southwest corner of 512 East Loockerman Street, parcel #ED-05-077.06-01-65.00; thence running perpendicular across said 15’ wide alley to a point in the southwest line of a 15’ wide alley; thence running North 57 degrees 11 minutes 46 seconds East 213.78 feet along the southwest line of said 15’ wide alley to a point at the corner of parcel #ED-05- 077.06-01-87.00; thence running 15 feet along the eastern boundary of said 15’ wide alley to the point and place of beginning and containing 3,206.70 square feet (0.0736 acres) of land, be the same more or less.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 3 Section 2. Since no person has been deprived of property by the vacating and abandoning of the aforesaid alley, no compensation is awarded. Section 3. The City shall retain a utility easement for the entire length and width of the aforesaid alley and all costs of conveyance shall be borne by the property owners. Section 4. This resolution shall be effective upon the filing of a revised plot plan of the aforesaid alley. ADOPTED: February 28, 2011 PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT - FEBRUARY 14, 2011 The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee met on February 14, 2011 with Chairwoman Russell presiding. Presentation - Broadband Technologies Opportunity Program (BTOP)/Job Center - Dover Public Library Ms. Margery Cyr, Library Director, advised members that the Delaware Division of Libraries (DDL) received a grant through the U. S. Department of Commerce for the Broadband Technologies Opportunity Program (BTOP). She stated that the DDL is collaborating with multiple program partners to support a statewide learning laboratory program aimed at improving workforce skills and job searches for Delawareans at each laboratory and library throughout Delaware. Ms. Cyr reminded members that the Dover Public Library and the Delaware Economic Development Office joined forces to develop a Job Center at the Library, which opened in October 2009. She advised members that this program is currently limited in capacity, largely due to staffing, space, and time constraints. Ms. Cyr explained that funding from the BTOP award will allow the DDL to establish comprehensive job/learning labs in libraries across the State by leveraging unique partnerships between libraries and social service organizations to combat unemployment through workforce development and educational programs. Ms. Cyr reviewed a Presentation titled BTOP 101, which provided information on the mission, grant award, project goals, partners, and benefits of the program. She noted that positive feedback had been received from those benefitting from the Library Job Center (included on Page 18 of the Presentation) and read into the record the following statement, which was received from one of the participants: “I just wanted to let you know that I am working as an HR Generalist full time and permanent in Philadelphia and the company is Simkar Corporation. I just wanted you to know how I am doing. Thanks again for all you did to assist me in my job search and guess what you inspired me to do? I have submitted a proposal to my Pastor to set our church in the direction of the library. I am excited about this endeavor and will let you know how it turns out.”

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 4 Ms. Cyr introduced Ms. Allie O’Neill, a volunteer working at the Economic Development Office through Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA). Ms. O’Neill advised members that VISTA is part of the Federal Americorps Program and that VISTA volunteers commit to serve full-time for one (1) year with non-profit organizations or local government agencies and assist in running programs that are designed to bring communities out of poverty. Ms. Cyr also introduced Ms. Bernadette Connell, who was hired through the BTOP Grant to establish job centers in the anchor libraries in the County and will be the Dover Public Library’s BTOP Coordinator. Ms. Connell stated that she is currently working with other anchor library BTOP to assure that the program curriculum is ready for an April 1, 2011 start date. Ms. Cyr introduced Ms. Becky Norton, the new Assistant Library Director for the Dover Public Library. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Ms. Cyr indicated that a portion of grant funding was used for a public relations program and that a public relations marketing consultant will assure that notification of this program is provided throughout the State. In response to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Cyr stated that the BTOP grant provides one (1) time funding for a three (3) year project; however, the DDL will be working on sustainability of the grant. She explained that there are plans to use some of the funding from the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism (E-Rate) as part of the sustainable funding for the grant. Ms. Cyr advised members that one of the requirements of the BTOP Grant is that the Job Center remain open for a considerable amount of time during the week. She noted that, in the current Library, the only area available for this is the meeting room and that staff is working on determining how easily the Job Center can be “broken down” once it is closed. Ms. Cyr stated that availability of the meeting room will be very limited once the Job Center is opened. She advised members that the Job Center will be located on the second floor of the new Library in the Technology Lab, adding that the Small Business Center will also be housed on that floor. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Ms. Cyr stated that the Seaford Public Library developed a Job Center and a Bridges Program (a structured education program) using the services of the Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP). She explained that the Bridges Program consists of three (3) day-long workshops with a specific curriculum each day. Ms. Cyr stated that it is very important that the Dover Public Library maintain the ability to assist customers on a walk-in basis, whenever needed, free of charge; however, she noted that the RSVP Bridges Program has also been very positive and the City is attempting to determine how to “blend” these programs. Ms. Connell advised members that the goal is to make all four (4) anchor libraries very similar, offering the same services, with customization available to address the specific needs of the community. In response to Mrs. Russell, Ms. Cyr stated that there were no applications received from City residents for the Coordinator positions.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 5 Responding to Mr. Ruane, Ms. O’Neill confirmed that benchmarks will be used to determine the progress of the programs and, to date, the majority of the individuals utilizing the current programs offered by the Dover Public Library are City residents. The Committee recommended acceptance of staff’s report on the Broadband Technologies Opportunity Program (BTOP)/Job Center - Dover Public Library. By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). Semi-Annual Report on Statistics Regarding Jobs and Businesses Gained and Lost in the City of Dover Since July 2010 Mr. William Neaton, Economic Development Director and Director of the Downtown Dover Partnership, reviewed the semi-annual report of employment statistics on the 14 largest employers in the Dover area and reminded members that this information is updated and presented to members on a semi-annual basis (the last report was presented to members on July 12, 2010). He also reminded members that his office has established relationships with the management and human resources departments of these companies in order to track job growth or decline. Mr. Neaton stated that, although the report does not reflect a significant increase in employment activity, he feels confident that the economy is turning around. As an example, he advised members that the Dover Sun Park is currently under construction at the Garrison Tract and that he meets with the project manager weekly. Mr. Neaton noted that local contractors have been hired for this project, which demonstrates a commitment to filling jobs related to this project locally. Mr. Neaton advised members that, for approximately two (2) years, he has been working on bringing an Arizona-based company to the City, which has the potential of bringing 500 jobs to the Dover area. He stated that the company originally considered 11 different locations, which have now been narrowed to three (3) possibilities, one (1) of which is Dover. In December, Mr. Neaton stated that he, along with other representatives from the Delaware Development Office, Delaware Technical and Community College, Dover Air Force Base, Delaware State University, etc., met with the project manager of this company. Mr. Neaton indicated that a response is expected within the next 30 days. Mr. Neaton stated that, for approximately 6 to 8 months, he has been working with another company that is considering relocating to Dover. He noted that this firm is searching for temporary warehouse space until such time that a 500,000 to 700,000 square foot facility can be built, and would bring approximately 50-100 jobs to the area. Mr. Neaton indicated that he anticipates a response from the project coordinator of this company within a week or two (2). Mr. Neaton advised members that a local company hopes to expand its manufacturing capabilities by adding approximately 200 employees and that an incentive package was provided to this firm in December.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 6 Referring to a previous request made by Dr. McGlumphy, Mr. Neaton apologized for not providing specific details regarding the downtown area in the report. He advised members that seven (7) businesses opened in the last six (6) months in the downtown area, creating approximately 15 additional jobs. Mr. Neaton stated that three (3) businesses closed, resulting in the loss of four (4) jobs, which reflects a net growth of 11 jobs. He reminded members of the positive activity occurring in the downtown area, such as the completion of the downtown charrette and construction planned to begin on Bayard Plaza. In response to Mr. Ruane regarding the sale of Wilmington Trust, Mr. Neaton stated that Mr. Bonar requested that he obtain details on the effects this sale may have on employment in the Dover area. Mrs. Russell suggested providing incentives to companies to remain in the City for several years, in addition to granting incentives for relocation to the area. She noted that it has been the City’s experience with several companies that once the incentives have ceased, the companies have left the area, resulting in the loss of jobs and building vacancies. Responding, Mr. Neaton stated that the Delaware Development Office provides a five (5) year incentive program; however, the City provides a 10 year tax abatement program. The Committee recommended acceptance of the Semi-Annual Report - Statistics Regarding Jobs and Businesses Gained and Lost in the City of Dover since July 2010. UPDATES The following updates were provided to members: Schutte Park Space - Boys and Girls Club/CDSA Mr. Darrell Tingle, Executive Director of the Greater Dover Boys and Girls Club, and Mr. Scott Brown, President of the Board for the Greater Dover Boys and Girls Club, stated that they have been meeting with the City Manager, Mr. Anthony DePrima, and the Parks and Recreation Director, Mr. Zachery Carter, to provide updates on the facility to be built in the Schutte Park area. Mr. Brown distributed a Schematic Plan for the magnet facility of the Greater Dover Boys and Girls Club, which was developed by Mr. Robert MacLeish, Sr., President of Lighthouse Construction, Inc. Mr. Brown noted that there are currently three (3) Boys and Girls Club facilities located in the City of Dover, with the Simon Circle facility being the largest. He stated that he was notified by the Dover Housing Authority that, soon, the building at Simon Circle will no longer be available and that the Boys and Girls Club must vacate the facility by January 2013. If approved by the City, Mr. Brown stated that the organization plans to present the Schematic Plan to an architect to develop a design and determine cost estimates to be presented to the State Boys and Girls Club Board for approval. He explained that it is hoped that the capital campaign will begin on July 1, 2011. Mr. Brown stated that the local Boys and Girls Club will need to raise 23%-24% of the funds and the State Board will raise the balance. He noted that the preliminary estimate is $1.5M to $4M and that it is planned to construct the facility in phases. Mr. Brown stated that he felt confident that the local Club could raise the required funds for Phase 1 of the project within one (1) year, noting that this phase would include the walk-in area, a team room, half of the gym, classrooms, etc., which would provide more than ample space to house the programs that the organization currently offers.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 7 Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. MacLeish assured members that, although utilities have not been finalized at this time, green energy sources will be considered. In response to Mrs. Russell, Mr. Brown stated that he anticipates that Phases 2 and 3 will begin immediately upon completion of Phase 1; however, Phase 4 will probably be delayed for 5 to 10 years. Mr. Ruane questioned if staff had reviewed a Conceptual Site Plan for this project and if there were any concerns regarding the size, exits, entrances, etc. Responding, Mr. DePrima stated that when the initial “footprint” of the project was received, it was not prepared as a Site Plan; therefore, details such as size/layout of the parking lot and stormwater management were not included. He reminded members that one of the Parks and Recreation Director’s goals is to develop a Master Plan for Schutte Park. Mr. DePrima stated that staff is collaborating with the Planning Department to determine the location of the building and the number of parking spaces required. He indicated that this information will be depicted on the Master Plan, noting that the Boys and Girls Club is not at the point in this project when a Site Plan is required. Mr. DePrima assured members that, since the building will be smaller than originally proposed, the area will be large enough to accommodate the project. Since Phase 4 includes adding a second floor to the building, Mr. DePrima suggested that a reserve area be designated to allow for additional parking, if needed. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. DePrima noted that the new roadway created by the realignment of Wyoming Mill Road will be completed prior to the construction phase of this project, and that City staff is aware of the Delaware Department of Transportation’s (DelDOT) requirements for entrances and exits for the facility. Elaborating, Mr. Scott Koenig, Public Services Manager/Director of Public Works, stated that a pre-construction meeting for the new roadway project is scheduled for March 1, 2011 and that the contractor plans to begin work within 30 days after that date. He noted that this project is estimated to be completed within six (6) months. In response to Mrs. Russell, Mr. DePrima stated that, although there are not many adjacent property owners, it is too early to begin notification, which will occur prior to the construction phase. Puncheon Run Watershed Action Team and Flood Plain Mapping Update Mr. Scott Koenig, Public Services Manager/Director of Public Works, advised members that the Kent Conservation District is nearing completion of the overflow channel provided through the Clean Water Fund. Staff has been working on preparing some of the map tiles related to the 100-year flood plain across the City and identifying all of the individual property owners involved. Mr. Koenig advised members that a flood study would entail significant funds and that publishing a new map could have unintended consequences if the map is sent to financing companies, who could establish flood insurance requirements. He stated that a resident of Shadow Court (adjacent to Puncheon Run) pursued obtaining his own letter of map revision through the Corps of Engineers, which cost approximately $400. Mr. Koenig explained that this letter could be used by the resident to prove to the insurance company that flood insurance is not necessary; however, this type of amendment does not actually change the map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He noted that all of the residents along Puncheon Run could pursue map revisions

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 8 for their individual properties, some being successful and others not. Mr. Koenig stated that he has been advised that there have been instances when a private surveyor has been requested to conduct “group” surveys for individual property owners. It was his feeling that this may be the avenue preferred by the City if map revisions are desired for these individual property owners versus obtaining a flood plain study. Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, suggested that the City serve as a facilitator and request the resident of Shadow Court, his surveyor, Mr. Mike Powell, and interested citizens to conduct a step-by-step workshop that would empower the residents to obtain map revisions. The Committee recommended that the City facilitate a workshop with appropriate technical assistance, including the resident of Shadow Court, to educate residents on how to obtain map revisions individually or by group action. By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). Planning and Funding for New Library Ms. Margery Cyr, Library Director, reviewed the update information regarding the planning and funding for the new library. CDBG Program Mrs. Tracey Harvey, Community Development Manager, reported the Status of FY 2009-2010 CDBG Projects. Housing and Recovery Act of 2008 Funds (Neighborhood Stabilization Fund) Mrs. Tracey Harvey, Community Development Manager, reviewed the Update on the Housing and Recovery Act of 2008 Funds (Neighborhood Stabilization Fund) which was provided to members. Mr. Ruane requested that staff provide the net result of the purchase and sale of properties. Youth Advisory Committee Mrs. Russell advised members that applications continue to be received and reviewed for the Youth Advisory Committee. In response to Mrs. Russell, Mr. Robert MacLeish, Sr., Greater Dover Committee, stated that he serves on the Youth Committee of the Greater Dover Committee and felt that the two (2) youth committees could benefit from interaction. Mrs. Russell assured Mr. MacLeish that Mrs. Kay Dietz-Sass, Public Affairs Coordinator, would send him information for his review. By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for acceptance of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 9 UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT - FEBRUARY 14, 2011 The Utility Committee met on February 14, 2011 with Chairman Ruane presiding. Green Energy Fund Grant Modification Mr. Ron Lunt, Public Utilities Director, reminded members that approximately five (5) years ago, the State of Delaware adopted the Delaware Energy Act, which includes a Green Energy Fund Program. He stated that this program allows the City’s electric customers to contribute funds to financially support the installation of renewable energy resources and promote the use of energy efficient technologies. Mr. Lunt noted that this program is administered by the Delaware Municipal Electric Corporation (DEMEC) for municipal providers in the State, including the City of Dover. He explained that the Green Energy Fund Program specifies grant limits (a percentage of payment and total payment) for the installation of qualifying technologies and advised members that DEMEC suggested that the City modify the percentage of the grant payments, the total grant limits, and increase efficiency standards for geothermal heat pumps. Mr. Lunt explained that the modifications will assist in ensuring that funds are available for the greatest number of grant applicants. He indicated that, currently, the City of Dover has a backlog of applications dating back approximately 1.5 years. Mr. Lunt reviewed the Dover Green Energy Fund Incentive/Grant Proposed Changes, which provides details of the proposed changes recommended by DEMEC and includes two (2) major variations recommended by staff. He noted that on December 10, 2010, Delmarva Power and Delaware Electric Cooperative modified their grant programs to incorporate similar recommendations. Mr. Lunt explained that staff’s recommendations for variations from DEMEC’s proposed changes are as follows: 1) Non-profit applicants for photovoltaic system grants should be provided funding at the same level as non-residential applicants. 2) Non-profit applicants for fuel cells should be provided the same grant percentage calculation (20%) as residential and non-residential applicants. Mr. Lunt stated that these suggestions from staff relate to the large number of schools, colleges, and other non-profit entities based in the City due to the fact that it is the State capital. Because of the substantial backlog of applications, he indicated that staff felt it more appropriate to treat all non-residential groups equitably. Mr. Lunt noted that non-profit groups were only identified by Delmarva Power as separate entities in the December 2010 modification; prior to this, they were classified in the same category as non-residential applicants. In reviewing the Dover Green Energy Fund Incentive/Grant Proposed Changes, Mr. Lunt advised members that the proposed changes were noted in red text on the first line of the table that applies to each type of system, and that the second line includes current program guidelines. He noted that the two (2) boxes highlighted in yellow identify staff’s suggested deviations from DEMEC recommendations. Mr. Lunt also stated that system qualifications were modified to better reflect the

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 10 value of the installation. For example, he indicated that photovoltaic and small wind turbine grants are now based on output rather than installation cost to incentivize the installation of more efficient systems and that these systems are now limited to a maximum size of 50 kW. Mr. Lunt stated that the same principle applies to solar water heater and geothermal heat pumps, noting that more efficient systems receive larger grants, or qualify for these grants. He stated that the least efficient geothermal heat pumps (previous units with energy efficiency ratings (EER) of 14) would be eliminated from the program, due, in part, to advancements in technology. Lastly, he advised members that the limit for the percentage calculation for fuel cell grants is being reduced to provide more equity between system options. Responding to Mr. McGiffin, Mr. Lunt indicated his concern that a State facility could be classified as a non-profit entity. Disagreeing, Mr. McGiffin stated that he felt that the State of Delaware would not qualify as a non-profit entity. To further encourage conservation, Mr. Lunt stated that residential applicants will be required to complete a City of Dover Public Utilities Residential Utility Service Audit, which may be scheduled by calling 736-7070. He indicated that all non-residential applicants will have an energy audit completed by a prequalified commercial auditor and that a listing of auditors can be found at www.energizedelaware.org/businessallies. Mr. Lunt noted that the expense of this audit will be the sole responsibility of the applicant and that the listing is maintained by Delaware’s Sustainable Energy Utility. He stated that this requirement is also included in the Green Energy Program administered for Delmarva Power customers. Staff recommended adopting the Dover Green Energy Fund Incentive/Grant Proposed Changes as outlined and funding non-profit applications at the same levels/caps as non-residential applications. Major Kosior felt that lowering the maximum grant amount could discourage non-profit entities from applying and suggested that DEMEC is attempting to encourage that specific sector. Responding, Mr. Lunt stated that the recommendation is not to discourage non-profit groups from applying, but to continue to consider non-profit applicants as they have been considered in the past, as part of the non-residential pool of applicants. He suggested that the proposed grant changes that reflect an inclination to encourage non-profits were made by Delmarva Power, which deals with various types of stakeholders. The Committee recommended approval of staff’s recommendation to adopt the Dover Green Energy Fund Incentive/Grant Proposed Changes, with the stipulation that the proposed changes be revised to incorporate the Delaware Municipal Electric Corporation’s (DEMEC’s) recommendation to include a distinction for non-profit organizations. By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). Retail Customer Demand Response Tariff Modification Members were reminded that, in 2009, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued Order No. 719 which attempted, in part, to remove barriers to Demand Response Programs (DRP) operated by regional transmission organizations such as PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM). Mr. Ron Lunt, Public Utilities Director, advised members that the City of Dover had a specific

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 11 interest in a requirement that those utilities selling less than four (4) million MWh’s must have the relevant electric retail regulatory authority (City Council) approve the participation of their retail customers in the program. He stated that on February 22, 2010, City Council affirmed this intent and created a Retail Customer Demand Response Tariff to document that the City of Dover affirms participation in this program. Mr. Lunt noted that the tenets of the PJM-operated DRP include a provision to compensate customers who reduce their consumption during periods of tight energy supply or high usage. He indicated that the reduction of load also ensures electric grid reliability and helps alleviate costs associated with new generation plants and transmission upgrades, both of which are concerns on the Delmarva Peninsula. Mr. Lunt explained that staff recommends that the City, or its authorized designee, be the only DRP authorized to administer this program in the City’s electric territory. He stated that, currently, staff intends to designate DEMEC as its authorized designee. Mr. Lunt advised members that the reason for the modification to a single provider is twofold, as follows: 1) DEMEC solicited proposals from five (5) different providers and the proposal selected provided the greatest return to the customer (80% return to customer, 20% retained for operations). 2) The City could call on its customers to reduce load during local system emergencies and/or in an effort to reduce load during power peaks, utilizing this procedure as a local demand response program which could reduce future capacity expenses. Mr. Lunt advised members that in calendar year 2010, nine (9) customers participated in the DRP through various Curtailment Service Providers that are registered with PJM. He assured members that these customers will be notified of the change in the tariff and would transition into the DEMEC program within one (1) year. Staff recommended adoption of the modifications to the Retail Customer Demand Response Tariff. It was noted that the proposed tariff has been reviewed by the City of Dover Utility Attorney, Mr. Kirk Betts, Betts and Holt, and that he has approved this tariff in its final form. The Committee recommended approval of staff’s recommendation to adopt modifications to the Retail Customer Demand Response Tariff. By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). Amendments to Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards (RPS) Legislation Mr. Ron Lunt, Public Utilities Director, reminded members that, in 2010, Delaware legislators amended the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards (RPS) legislation by requiring municipally-owned electric utilities to develop plans to include renewable power sources in their power supply portfolios by 2014. He indicated that the amount of renewable power sources must be compatible with the standards set for Delmarva Power, which plans to obtain 11.5% of its power from renewable sources by 2014 and 25% by 2025.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 12 Mr. Lunt reviewed a proposed amendment to the RPS legislation, which would allow municipalities to include and count conservation, energy efficiency and demand-side management programs in their RPS plans. He noted that staff felt that these aspects of energy management are just as important as renewable energy sources and that a credit should be received for these efforts. Mr. Lunt explained that, in general, these kinds of programs are more cost effective than renewable energy sources at this time. Staff recommended that the Mayor and Council President write a letter in support of the RPS Legislation Amendment. Mr. Ruane requested that staff advise members when the proposed legislation is presented for a hearing so that they may attend to indicate their support. The Committee moved to recommend that the Mayor and Council President send a letter in support of the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards (RPS) legislation amendment. By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). Review of Utility Related Capital Investment Plan (CIP) (Electric and Water/Wastewater) (December) Members were provided a Project Tracking Report, as of December 31, 2010, for the Utility (Electric and Water/Wastewater) Related Capital Investment Plan (CIP). Mr. Ron Lunt, Public Utilities Director, stated that Council approved a change order for the inclusion of a force main as a part of the Delaware State University/Delaware Technical and Community College Force Main Rerouting Project. He advised members that the infrastructure has been installed and is currently being tested and if it passes, the project will be substantially complete. Mr. Lunt explained that blacktop work and seeding will be completed in the spring when temperatures are warmer. In addition, Mr. Lunt noted that the City has received full approval from the Delaware Department of Transportation for the Route 13 Water Main Project and he anticipates opening the project for bids within the next two (2) weeks. He reminded members that this project includes the replacement of the Route 13 southbound lane water main, from State Street to White Oak Road, and will be a nighttime project. The Committee recommended acceptance of the Utility Related CIP (Electric and Water/Wastewater) Report. By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for acceptance of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 13 LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT - FEBRUARY 14, 2011 The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met on February 14, 2011, with Chairman Leary presiding. Review and Recommendation - Filling of Critical Positions During their meeting of February 23, 2009, members recommended approval of a Hiring Freeze for Fiscal Year 2008-2009, but to allow the hiring of critical positions through the review and approval of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee and City Council. It was suggested that there be a “standing” agenda item to consider the filling of critical positions and, if there were no positions to consider, the item could be removed. Mr. Leary noted that there were no critical positions to be considered; therefore, no further action was required. Proposed Amendment to Purchasing Policy - Debarment Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, advised members that the City recently received a U. S. Department of Energy grant through the Delaware Emergency Management Agency (DEMA). She explained that, as a result of a sub-grant monitoring visit by DEMA on November 17, 2010, DEMA recommended incorporating written procedures for vendor debarment in the City’s Purchasing Policy. Mrs. Mitchell reviewed (new) Section 11 - Debarment of Vendors for Consideration of Awards of the City’s Purchasing Policy. She noted that the amended policy would include procedures for the debarment of vendors/contractors who have violated policy standards, prevent such vendors from contracting with or selling items to the City, and require the use of the Federal Excluded Parties Listing to preclude the award of any contract utilizing federal funds to debarred companies/individuals. The Committee recommended that (new) Section 11 - Debarment of Vendors for Consideration of Awards be incorporated in the City’s Purchasing Policy. By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). Debt Management Policy Review Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer reviewed the Draft City of Dover Debt Management Policy (issued August 24, 2009 and revised February 14, 2011), noting that the Finance Department periodically reviews this Policy and presents recommended changes. She explained that recommended revisions to the Policy were depicted in red font, noting that a majority of the suggested changes were not substantive but were made to clarify current policy. Mrs. Mitchell noted the addition of the term “bank qualified” to Section IV, Paragraph A - Short-Term Debt (Page 3). She indicated that, in this context, the term refers to a tax-free commercial bank loan or tax-exempt bonds sold to a bank, and noted that this definition was added to the Policy Glossary (Page 13). In addition, Mrs. Mitchell stated that changes were made to Section V - Restrictions on Debt Issuance, A) Charter Restrictions, Paragraph iii (Page 4) to reflect that the City’s debt issuance is limited to five (5) percent of the total assessed value of real property, in accordance with the City’s current Charter.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 14 Mrs. Mitchell explained that the information included in blue font on Pages 4 and 5 of the Draft Policy is not part of the policy but was inserted to provide additional information to members regarding the City’s current financial standing. Mr. McGiffin commended Mrs. Mitchell’s diligence in ensuring that the policy is current. The Committee recommended approval of the revised City of Dover Debt Management Policy. By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for acceptance of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). JOINT LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION AND SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT - FEBRUARY 17, 2011 A Joint Meeting of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration and Safety Advisory and Transportation Committees was held on February 17, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. with Chairman Leary presiding. Proposals to Address Community Concerns Members were recently made aware of gang activities occurring in and around the City of Dover. Meetings were held on November 15, 2010 and December 6, 2010 to discuss these issues. As a result of these meetings, Police Chief James Hosfelt reviewed a letter from the Dover Police Department, dated February 4, 2011, which offered possible solutions. Chief Hosfelt reminded members that the Dover Police Department is currently staffed at 89 officers and that two (2) additional officers will be hired in March, based on Council’s prior approval, one (1) of which will be paid over the next 30 months by a Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS) grant. Chief Hosfelt stated that these two (2) officers will bring the Department’s staffing to 91 officers. Chief Hosfelt requested consideration of hiring two (2) additional officers, which would bring the total police force to 93 officers, and that the hiring process be completed in time for all new officers to attend the next Delaware State Police Academy class, which he stated may be scheduled as early as mid-March 2011. He reminded members that the current police operating budget can absorb the costs of the additional officers through the remainder of the fiscal year; however, he noted that it will take a strong commitment by the Committee and all of Council to fund these positions in FY 2012 and beyond. Chief Hosfelt assured members that the Police Department understands its responsibility to serve the citizens of Dover, while working within the confines of the budget established by City Council, and that the request would not cause detriment to other needed services within the City. He indicated that the authorized strength of 93 officers would allow for the number of officers assigned to community policing, quality of life, and the drug unit to be restored to previous levels.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 15 Mrs. Russell moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Bonar. Responding to Mr. McGiffin, Mrs. Russell indicated that her motion was to support the recommendation to increase the police force to 93 officers. In response to Mr. Bonar, Chief Hosfelt explained his suggestion regarding the concept of “civilianizing” some positions within the Department that are currently filled by police officers, such as the Red Light Enforcement Officer, noting that the cost of a civilian employee would be less than that of an officer. He stated that there are some positions that could be filled with retired law enforcement officers, and that the State Police have adopted this approach with some units. Chief Hosfelt explained that hiring retired officers for these positions is a necessity because police certification is required, and retired officers can maintain certification with very little impact to the organization. He advised members that a civilian Sex Offender Agent costs the State approximately $40,000 per year and a civilian Red Light Enforcement Officer costs approximately $46,000 per year, much less than the cost of a new officer at $85,000. Therefore, he stated that filling these positions with retired officers would be another way to increase available police staffing at a cost much less than hiring an additional officer. Responding to Mr. Bonar regarding the request to establish a one-time “Police Chief” discretionary fund by including an additional $40,000 in the budget, Chief Hosfelt stated that the additional funds are being requested to financially sustain the Department through the end of the fiscal year when the Department will be “short” officers due to Academy attendance. Mr. DePrima assured members that staff has completed the latest estimate for the current budget and that funds are available to accommodate the two (2) monetary recommendations (two (2) additional officers and an additional $40,000 in discretionary funds). Mr. Bonar moved to amend the motion by accepting the Police Chief’s Report in its entirety by recommending approval of the recommendation for the additional $40,000 in discretionary funds and civilianizing positions within the Department that are currently filled by police officers. The motion was seconded by Mr. Davis. Mr. McGiffin relayed reluctance to support the amendment to the motion since the financial implications of the additional $40,000 discretionary funds and the creation of three (3) civilian positions are not known. Responding, Chief Hosfelt stated that the recommendation is to explore the option of civilianizing positions so that, in the future, if it is determined that additional police officers are necessary, this approach could be used to increase the number of police officers with less impact on the budget. However, he assured members that, at this time, staff is not recommending authorization to civilianize the positions, but is only recommending that this concept be explored for possible implementation in the future. In regards to the additional $40,000 discretionary funds, Mr. DePrima stated that the financial implication would be limited to $40,000, explaining that if the $40,000 being considered is not provided to the Police Department, it would be applied to the fund balance.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 16 Responding to Mr. Ruane regarding consideration of civilianizing School Resource Officers, Chief Hosfelt informed members that the State Police attempted to make all School Resource Officers agents rather than officers (retired police officers) last year, and State legislators did not approve this request. As a result, he stated that this change would require an amendment in legislation and noted that staff would be willing to further investigate this matter. Mr. Ruane requested that staff determine the possibility of including the civilianization of the School Resource Officers and provide members an update. The amendment to include accepting the Police Chief’s Report in its entirety by recommending approval of an additional $40,000 in discretionary funds and consideration of civilianizing positions within the Department that are currently filled by police officers was unanimously carried. The Committee recommended that the Police Chief be authorized to hire two (2) additional officers for the upcoming Police Academy class, which would bring the total police force to 93 officers; establish a one-time "Police Chief" discretionary fund by including an additional $40,000 in the budget; and review the feasibility of civilianizing positions within the department that are currently filled by police officers. By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). By consent agenda, Mrs. Williams moved for acceptance of the Joint Legislative, Finance, and Administration and Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). Public Comment Period (15 Minutes) There was no one present wishing to speak during the public comment period. ANNUAL REPORTS By motion of Mrs. Williams, seconded by Mr. Bonar, the following Annual Reports were accepted by consent agenda (Mr. Leary absent): Fire Department Planning and Community Development Police Department EVALUATION OF BIDS - WELLHEAD REDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that the Public Utilities Department maintains blanket contracts with potential contractors to ensure that the bidding rules are adhered to for any contractors that might be hired to perform work for the Utility Department. He indicated that these contracts are priced as a "time, equipment, and material" contract and may exceed $25,000 annually. Mr. DePrima explained that the Wellhead Development Contract will provide for the rehabilitation and repair of nineteen (19) production wells in an effort to maintain operations and/or increase the yield of each well as it relates to the permitted allocation. He noted that the recommended contractor

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 17 will perform flow testing of each well and provide a report detailing testing results and recommendations. Mr. DePrima stated that, upon reviewing information provided by the contractor, the City of Dover will plan for and/or schedule further repairs as needed based upon the bid prices provided. Mr. DePrima stated that a Request for Proposal (RFP) was advertised according to the City purchasing policy by the City's Purchasing Agent under RFP #11-0037DPU and a mandatory pre-bid meeting was held on January 13, 2011. Three (3) potential bidders attended this meeting and two (2) submitted qualified proposals. The proposals were evaluated using the following criteria: demonstrated experience with similar projects including a history of achieving highest and best results among its peers; cost; previous projects in the City of Dover; and availability to perform duties. Mr. DePrima stated that the recommended contractor scored the highest on this evaluation and, based on the minimum anticipated scope of work for this year, had the lowest cost proposal. The two (2) bidders provided base bid prices for known (defined) work, hourly rates for anticipated (undefined work), and future year escalation charges. A.C. Schultes of Delaware, Inc. included a 3.5% annual escalation and Uni-Tech Drilling Company, Inc. included a 10% annual escalation. Staff recommended awarding a three (3) year agreement for the Wellhead Redevelopment Blanket Contract to A.C. Schultes of Delaware, Inc., as per the pricing included in the bid submittal. Mr. McGiffin moved for approval of Staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Salters and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). EVALUATION OF BIDS - ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that the Water and Wastewater Utilities are continuously working on various system upgrades and capacity improvements to the infrastructure of both utilities. These projects take numerous hours of engineering design and analysis, in addition to project management efforts. He explained that this request for proposal was designed to obtain engineering firms capable of performing engineering and project management services in the appropriate areas for each utility. Nineteen (19) proposals were received, reviewed, and analyzed. Five (5) firms were deemed non-responsive due to the omission of required information. The fourteen (14) firms which submitted complete proposals were evaluated based on ability to provide services and may not represent the lowest price. Mr. DePrima stated that, due to the number of projects, the variety of complexity involved in each project, and the need to meet the requirements of the Utilities, staff recommended, awarding the contract to three (3) companies. This would allow flexibility to choose a firm based on its availability and individual expertise. Mr. DePrima noted that each firm was evaluated on each function in the following areas: experience (demonstrated experience with similar projects and history of achieving highest and best results among its peers); project management (project organization and management, including staffing, management control and sub-contractor utilization); staff (qualifications and utilization of the firm's employees assigned to the provision of services, including previous work experience, technical

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 18 management experience, education and training); costs (analysis of hourly rates and other costs for the various phases of services proposed); service ability (firm's ability to provide a full spectrum of engineering services including personnel, managerial, and other resources required to meet the project's objectives); location (geographical location in relation to the City of Dover); local standards (familiarity and experience with the standards of the City of Dover, Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), Kent Conservation District (KCD), Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC), and Delaware Office of Drinking Water (ODW). Mr. DePrima noted that the total cost over the term of each contract will probably exceed $25,000; however, costs will be reflected in the appropriate budget. Upon award, these consultants will be available to all City departments requiring civil engineering based services. These services, as contained within the Scope of Work in the Request for Proposals, include: civil design engineering, construction engineering/inspection, project administration, general civil support (plan review, cost estimating, surveying, mapping, project conceptualization, etc.), traffic engineering, structural engineering, and geological/geotechnical engineering or other related services. Staff recommended awarding three (3) three-year contracts to URS Corporation, Pennoni Associates Inc., and KCI Technologies, Inc., as per the pricing included in the bid submittal. Mr. Bonar moved for approval of Staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Salters and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). EVALUATION OF BIDS - DOVER PUBLIC LIBRARY BID PAC B Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that in July 2009, EDiS Company was selected as the construction management firm for the Dover Public Library project. During their Regular Meeting of November 22, 2010, City Council approved a contract with EDiS Company for construction and construction administration services, pending final determination of the guaranteed maximum price. He noted that, with the completion of the construction documents and bidding, the construction phase for the library project is ready to begin. Mr. DePrima stated that EdiS Company would serve as the Construction Manager at Risk for the Dover Public Library project. Under the Construction Manager at Risk agreement, a maximum guaranteed price for the library construction was determined after all bids were reviewed by EdiS Company. The proposed Guaranteed Maximum Price for the construction is $16,502,821. The project is slightly below budget when combined with all the other related project costs, including the revised cost of the exit road included in Bid Pac A. The total project costs are $20,631,252, which is $14,917 less than estimated in November. There have been a number of changes throughout the cost summary, some of which are as follows: 1) as prices were refined, costs moved from the contingency in Other Construction Costs to Trade Costs; 2) design cost in the original document overlooked the architect's program confirmation fee spent early in the project; 3) estimated costs of Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment was reduced; and 4) there is a new $21,303 owner's contingency in Owner Administration that can be used for contingency costs not related to construction, such as site work, in addition to the $485,802 construction contingency. At the end of the project, if costs are under the Guaranteed Maximum Price or budgeted contingency costs are not used, the savings will go to the City.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 19 Mr. DePrima explained that, if there are apparent savings during construction, he may reinstate options to construct some features that have been removed from the project through value engineering and present them to City Council for approval. He noted that EDiS Company continues to work on cost savings with contractors and that any further cost savings will be reflected in a greater owner's contingency. Mr. DePrima stated that a number of additional value engineering options were exercised during the bidding administration phase to bring the project within the scope of the budget; however, none of the value engineering options have affected the scope of the project, program space, or the Leadership in Energy Design (LEED) certification. Included in the base budget is the fit-out of the 1,200 square foot multi-purpose rooms. Originally, this was recommended as an add alternate to be funded at a later date; however the importance of the multiple purpose room was elevated with the recent announcement of the Broadband Technologies Opportunity Program (BTOP) Grant. The federal grant requires a job center and technical training room. The Technology Lab was planned to serve as an interim multiple-purpose room; therefore, the multi-purpose room must be fitted out now. Constructing the multi-purpose room as part of the core construction will allow rental revenue to be received earlier and permit more community programming. To fit the multi-purpose room into the core construction budget, the stone exterior ends of the building will be removed from the project and a more cost effective brick treatment will be utilized. This change was strongly endorsed by the Anchor Library Steering Committee and was reviewed with the Historic District Commission, who will review the alternate exterior treatment of the exterior ends of the building. Mr. DePrima noted that the Teen Loft fit-out is not included in the Guaranteed Maximum Price. He stated that the Anchor Library Steering Committee strongly urges City Council to consider adding this option back into the project, as teen services are an essential library component. EDiS Company advises that the fit-out can be added for $169,080, which is is significantly less than the $338,775 estimate given to City Council in November and represents less than 1% of the total project budget. The Steering Committee feels that this is an important part of the library programming, particularly in light of the efforts to combat teen gangs and drug use, as the Teen Loft will become a safe place for Dover's teens. The Committee also feels that the Teen Loft is an important feature to promote for library fundraising. In addition, fitting the Teen Loft after the library is built would cost more and disrupt library operations. The Steering Committee feels that this added cost can be covered through the fundraising campaign. Mr. DePrima advised members that, assuming the $169,080 would be borrowed, $19,000 would be added to the debt service figures presented in November, resulting in a tax increase of less than $1 per year. Referring to the updated Library Funding Plan, Mr. DePrima noted that an additional $257,761 has been raised since the plan was presented in November and stated that this is reflected in the reduction of the construction loan line item. Mr. Gerald Doherty, Vice President, EDiS Company, advised members that EdiS has agreed to an open book process, which means that the City will have the opportunity to audit the books, evaluate bidders, and evaluate the results to see how the total price was arrived at. He noted that the project was publicly advertised for all bidders under certain criteria, such as required bonding of contractors.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 20 The lowest bids were reviewed to ensure the contractor had bid on the correct project, the right scope of work, and did not miss any part of the proposal. Mr. Doherty stated that EDiS was able to successfully select the low bidder in every category of the project and abided by the City’s requirements for local vendor and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) preference. Mr. Doherty stated that EDiS agreed to manage the project as a Construction Manager at Risk under the condition that a large amount of money is set aside to draw from to cover any inconsistencies in the drawings and any items that may occur during construction of the project that could cause price increases. He noted that there are no shared savings; therefore, if contingency funds remain after the project is completed, the savings will be returned to the City. Mr. Doherty advised members that, prior to finalizing the contracts for the subcontractors, the contractors will be able to recommend voluntary alternates or cost-saving ideas to further reduce the cost of the project. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. Doherty stated that over 115 bidders responded to the advertisements for bids and 20 separate contracts would be awarded. He noted that there would be a minimum of 35-40 and a maximum of 80-85 individuals onsite during construction. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mr. Doherty stated that four (4) DBE contracts, constituting 20% of the cost of the project, will be awarded. He advised members that the number may be higher once the sub-tier contracts are awarded. Mr. Salters requested that an update be provided on the number of actual DBE contracts after the sub-tier contracts were completed. Staff recommended authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contractual agreement with EdiS Company for a preliminary estimated amount of $16,502,821 for the construction of the project and approving the Library Steering Committee’s request to fit out the Teen Loft. Mr. DePrima advised members that the next matter that City Council will consider related to this project is Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment, which are currently budgeted at $938,800 and that this matter will be addressed in late 2011 or early 2012. Mr. Ruane moved to authorize the City Manager to enter into a Construction Manager at Risk contract with EDiS Company for construction management and construction of the Dover Library project for the maximum guaranteed price of $16,502,821. The motion was seconded by Mr. McGiffin. Referring to the list of Funding Sources provided, Mrs. Williams asked for clarification on the Sale of 45 S. State Street - Use Bridge Loan and Sale of Building - Construction Loan, listed in the “Highly Probable” column. Responding, Mr. DePrima stated that both of these items were placed in the “Highly Probable” column because City Council has control over the sale of the building and some potential buyers have expressed interest. He noted that bridge and construction loans will be obtained to cover the difference between the funding goal and the amount of funds raised to date, which currently amounts to $2,742,239. Mr. DePrima stated it is hoped that $1.2M will be raised from the sale of the building and the remaining funds will be obtained through fundraising. If the full amount is not attained through these means, the remainder will be included in a financing plan.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 21 The motion to authorize the City Manager to enter into a Construction Manager at Risk contract with EDiS Company for construction management and construction of the Dover Library project for the maximum guaranteed price of $16,502,821 was carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes (Mr. Bonar, Mrs. Russell, Mr. McGiffin, Mr. Salters, Mr. Ruane, and Mr. Hogan), two (2) no (Dr. McGlumphy and Mrs. Williams) (Mr. Leary absent). Mr. Ruane moved to authorize the City Manager to include the fitting-out of the Teen Loft, in the amount of $169,080, in the contract, seconded by Mr. McGiffin and carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes (Mr. Bonar, Mrs. Russell, Mr. McGiffin, Mr. Salters, Mr. Ruane, and Mr. Hogan), two (2) no (Dr. McGlumphy and Mrs. Williams) (Mr. Leary absent). Mr. Hogan announced that he plans to donate $1,000 to the Teen Loft on May 9, 2011 and encouraged any and all members of the community to send donations to the City Clerk’s Office and so that one (1) large donation could be made at that time. Mr. Bonar stated that the Teen Loft will go a long way toward trying to incorporate public safety improvements that the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee has been working on with the Police Department. EVALUATION OF BIDS - DOVER PUBLIC LIBRARY BID PAC A - REVISED FINAL ESTIMATE AND TRUE-UP COSTS Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that Library Bid Pac A includes construction of the rear access drive, a retaining wall, and other related improvement for the new Library site adjacent to City Hall. During the initial excavation for the road and the retaining wall, a significant amount of unsuitable soils were discovered by the contractor, Reybold Construction, Inc. No soil borings were conducted in this area of the site as part of site plan process; therefore, these conditions were not anticipated to be found. These expenses were negotiated as part of the change order process. The amount of unsuitable soils required significant undercutting below the retaining wall foundation and the road bed. In addition, all of the material that was removed from the site as a result of the undercutting operation was deemed unsuitable for future use on the project; therefore, a substantial amount of crushed concrete was required to back fill under the access drive and behind the retaining wall. All of this additional work resulted in a substantial change order for this portion of the overall project. The original contract amount for the access drive, retaining wall, and related improvements was $130,000 and the revised true-up cost is $195,000. Construction is approximately 90% complete as of February 15, 2011. Staff recommended approval of the revised final estimate and true-up costs for this phase of the project in the amount of $195,000 for the payment of construction improvements associated with Dover Public Library - Bid Pac A. The motion was seconded by Mr. McGiffin and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Leary absent). FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2011-08 - 2011 AMENDMENTS TO THE 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, explained that on January 24, 2011, the First Readings of Ordinance #2011-03 - 2011 Amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan - and Ordinance #2011-04 - Rezoning of Property located at Grove Street

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 22 and Railroad Avenue were held. At that time, amendments were referred to the Planning Commission and Public Hearings were set before City Council for Monday, March 14, 2011. Due to an error in Public Notice, one of the amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and the Public Hearing for the rezoning of property located at Grove Street and Railroad Avenue must be rescheduled. Staff recommended that a Public Hearing be rescheduled before the Planning Commission on Monday, March 21, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. and that a Public Hearing before City Council be set for Monday, April 11, 2011 at 7:30 p.m., at which time the Second Reading and final action by Council will take place. Council President Hogan reminded the public that copies of the proposed ordinance are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office. Mrs. Williams moved for approval of Staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the Zoning Ordinance Amendments as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ‚ Ordinance #2011-08 Amending the 2008 Comprehensive Plan by replacing Map 12-1: Land Development Plan COUNCIL MEMBER ANNOUNCEMENTS Council President Hogan announced that the City of Dover Municipal Election would be held on Tuesday, April 19, 2011 between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. The polling places are: The Elk's Lodge #1903, located at 200 Saulsbury Road for the 1st & 4th Districts; The Seventh Day Adventist Church, located at 647 Wyoming Avenue for the 2nd District; and The Dover Park Recreation Center located at 1210 White Oak Road for the 3rd District. He noted that residents who wish to vote in the City of Dover Municipal Election must be registered to vote with the State Department of Elections by Thursday, March 31, 2011. Mr. Hogan stated that absentee ballots are available and that further information can be obtained by visiting the City of Dover website at www.cityofdover.com or calling the City Clerk's Office at 736-7008. Mr. McGiffin reminded everyone of the African American Festival scheduled for June 25, 2011. Mr. McGiffin stated that a fundraiser for the Interfaith Men’s Shelter, featuring music by Celtic Harvest, would be held at the Loockerman Exchange on Thursday, March 17, 2011 from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Mr. Hogan expressed gratitude to the Police Department, the Fire Department, and the Planning and Community Development Department for their Annual Reports. Mr. Bonar moved for adjournment, seconded by Mrs. Williams and unanimously carried.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 23 Meeting Adjourned at 8:22 P.M. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All orders, ordinances, and resolutions adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of February 28, 2011, are hereby approved. CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. MAYOR /TM S:\ClerksOffice\Agendas&Minutes\Council-Minutes\2005\08-22-2005 Council.wpd

City of Dover Police Department 2010 Annual Report “To Protect & Serve”

Complaints Five Year Comparison 35,000 33,692 30,482 29,632 29,413 28,440 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 *2010 Complaint totals now include all calls for service. 2010

Total Group A Crime Five Year Comparison 8,000 6,265 6,137 6,003 5,738 5,843 6,000 3,641 3,795 3,933 3,521 3,435 4,000 2,000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 TOTAL CLEARED 2010

Violent Crime (Murder, Forcible Rape, Robbery, Aggravated Assault) Five Year Comparison 400 340 350 331 331 316 300 261 269 244 250 243 250 199 200 150 100 50 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 TOTAL CLEARED 2010

Robbery Clearance Rate Dover Police Department -vs- Nation 100% 80% 70% 71% 64% 64% 63% 60% 40% 32% 31% 30% 31% 20% 0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 DOVER PD NATION NATIONAL FIGURES NOT AVAILABLE FOR 2010 2010

Burglary Clearance Rate Dover Police Department -vs- Nation 100% 80% 69% 60% 60% 60% 46% 48% 40% 20% 13% 13% 13% 12% 0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 DOVER PD NATION NATIONAL FIGURES NOT AVAILABLE FOR 2010 2010

Property Crime (Burglary, Theft, Motor Vehicle Theft, Arson) Five Year Comparison 2,500 2,193 2,094 1,974 1,918 2,000 1,764 1,500 999 1,000 883 898 742 786 500 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 TOTAL CLEARED 2010

Drugs, Vice, & Organized Crime Section (DVOC) Because of the DVOC Section’s dedication and commitment, the DVOC Section handled a total of 1,733 cases resulting in 1,732 arrests. As a result of these arrests, the unit seized a large number of illegal drugs and money. These seizure totals include 23,705 grams of marijuana, 5,090 grams of cocaine, 7.8 grams of heroin, 110 Ecstasy Pills, 2,360 prescription pills, and 1,968 pieces of counterfeit merchandise. Seizure totals were remarkable for 2010. The DVOC Section conducted a number of solo investigations along with numerous multi-jurisdictional investigations. A total of $831,516.65 in cash was seized and 14 vehicles totaling approximately $70,000.00. These totals were divided among the many jurisdictions who participated in the investigations. Photo shows a small portion of the counterfeit merchandise seized by the DVOC Section. 2010

Crash Breakdown Five Year Comparison 1,600 1,348 1,400 1,321 1,204 1,189 1,200 1,119 1,000 800 563 600 515 521 492 452 400 325 301 278 270 262 200 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 PROPERTY DAMAGE PRIVATE PROPERTY PI & FATAL 2010

Traffic Arrests Five Year Comparison 24,000 20,001 20,469 19,247 20,000 18,112 18,314 16,000 12,000 8,000 4,000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2010

Traffic Arrest Summary CLASSIFICATION OF VIOLATIONS NUMBER OF ARRESTS 2009 2010 DANGEROUS MOVING VIOLATIONS DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE 170 180 SPEEDING 3,813 5,097 RIGHT OF WAY 183 164 FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 185 199 STOP SIGN 514 828 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 228 316 CARELESS OR INATTENTIVE DRIVING 897 771 SUBTOTAL 5,990 7,555 LICENSE & REGISTRATION VIOLATIONS LICENSE VIOLATIONS 1,549 992 SUSPENSION & REVOCATION 1,815 1,677 REGISTRATION & TITLE 6,944 6,979 SUBTOTAL 10,308 9,648 OTHER VIOLATIONS SEATBELT VIOLATIONS 2,371 2,340 CHILD RESTRAINT VIOLATIONS 109 159 LEAVING THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT 97 64 FAILURE TO REPORT AN ACCIDENT 23 16 EQUIPMENT VIOLATIONS 219 200 ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS 884 487 SUBTOTAL 3,703 3,266 GRAND TOTAL 20,001 20,469 2010

City Ordinance Summons & Cash Receipts CITY ORDINANCE SUMMONS ISSUED PAID DISMISSED 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 Parking 6,565 6,403 3,968 3,835 246 305 Handicap 247 307 74 97 88 130 Fire Lane 156 155 90 72 16 10 False Alarm 568 737 428 604 13 17 Loud Noise 186 373 97 209 5 9 Underage Consumption 68 59 55 30 0 0 Animals 85 54 52 41 17 8 Other 341 512 136 267 16 11 TOTALS 8,216 8,600 4,900 5,155 401 490 CASH RECEIPTS 2009 2010 City Ordinance Summons $165,325.00 $184,263.00 Police Reports $34,055.00 $35,245.00 Bicycle License $2.00 $1.25 Miscellaneous* $14,559.10 $9,881.00 TOTALS $213,941.10 $229,390.25 2010

Police Time Distribution Hours PERSONNEL STRENGTH 2009 2010 Authorized Strength 93 93 Actual Strength 91 89 TIME DISTRIBUTION, HOURS 2009 2010 Total on Duty 157,108.00 155,860.50 Criminal Investigation 74,780.50 71,892.50 Accident Investigation 4,994.50 4,744.50 Special Duty 26,380.00 26,639.00 Foot Patrol 519.50 749.50 Station Duty 14,366.50 15,434.00 Motor Patrol 16,513.00 16,267.00 Traffic Duty 702.50 726.50 Court 5,311.00 4,989.50 Administrative 13,540.50 14,418.00 Sick* 2,631.50 1,741.00 *sick time not included in total MISCELLANEOUS CONTACTS 2009 2010 Traffic Reprimands 3,175 3,379 Crime Prevention Checks 2,935 2,746 2010

Dover Police Department 2010 Grant Funding Summary Total Funded State Attorney General's Office State Law Enforcement Assistance Fund (SLEAF) – funding from state drug cases reallocated for supplemental law enforcement equipment & programs Start-up funding for the new Crime Scene Investigations (CSI) unit and $40,623.00 equipment upgrade for the department’s command post vehicle. State funding augmentation for Delaware Police Chiefs' Council (DPCC) 10,184.00 payroll. The Dover Police Department administers grants for this agency because the council’s liaison office is located in their building. State Department of Public Safety State Aid to Local Law Enforcement (SALLE) – annual allocation of state $15,360.42 funding for supplemental law enforcement equipment & programs. DPCC annual funding assistance for payroll expenses. 9,500.00 DPCC SALLE allocation for the annual training seminar held in Rehoboth, 6,000.00 DE Emergency Illegal Drug Enforcement (EIDE) - annual allocation of state funding 10,385.15 for supplemental law drug enforcement programs Highway Safety Grants – funds additional enforcement hours in safety focus areas 50,715.99 including impaired driving, occupant protection and aggressive driving Highway Safety Events - funds additional enforcement hours for monthly 26,289.20 programs US Department of Justice Edward G. Byrne Memorial, Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) – recurring three $86,575.00 year federal grant for supplemental law enforcement initiatives. Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Hiring Recovery Program 242,513.00 (CHRP) - three year federal hiring grant for replacing one officer lost due to attrition and/or economic conditions. Grand Total $498,145.76 2010

A member of the Dover Police Department since 2005, PFC Chris Bumgarner was named Officer of the Year for 2010, in recognition of his outstanding work ethic and dedication to duty. One example of his dedication is the apprehension of multiple shooting suspects after a gang related gun battle had ensued in a Dover neighborhood. The gun fight involved numerous gang members that were in the process of fleeing the area when the call came into the Dover Police Department. PFC Bumgarner was one of the officers who responded to the scene and based on the physical evidence and the information being provided, he was able to identify multiple residences that the suspected shooters had fled into and set up a perimeter around the homes and contained the situation. As a result of PFC Bumgarner’s decisive thinking and actions, officers were able to safely and successfully contact and arrest multiple shooters involved in the incident as well as recover weapons utilized in the shooting. PFC Christopher Bumgarner truly exemplifies the term "Dover's Finest". A member of the Dover Police Department since 2001, Robert was named Civilian of the Year for 2010, in recognition of his outstanding professionalism and dedication to his duties, whereas he completed destruction trips to the steel mill in which over 150 weapons were destroyed. He also teaches evidence and photography to both the Citizens Police Academy and new police officers. Robert is also called upon to take photos at City functions in addition to his regular duties. Robert Neylan clearly has earned the honor of being named Civilian of the Year. 2010

911 Center In 2010, the 911 center received 123,150 telephones calls, 37,613 of those calls were received on the 911 emergency lines. The 911 center averaged 338 calls daily. 25,032 911 Wireless 12,581 911 Landline 85,537 Administrative 2010

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Public Hearing before the Dover City Council March 14, 2011 Proposed Amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan: A summary of the proposed amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan follows. A detailed description and analysis of each proposed amendment is provided in the following pages of this report. 1. Land Use and Zoning Matrix (Table 12-1): The first staff-initiated amendment includes the addition of zoning classifications to the Open Space land use classification in the Land Use and Zoning Matrix. 2. Land Development Plan Map Changes Related to Open Space (Map 12-1): The second staff-initiated amendment is a series of changes to the Land Development Plan Map (Map 12-1) to change the Land Use Classification of a series of properties from Open Space to more appropriate classifications based on their uses and surrounding uses. During the implementation of the City’s ROS (Recreational and Open Space) zone, staff identified a number of parcels that had shown on the Land Development Plan Map as Open Space, while their use was something different. This is the fine- tuning of the Land Development Plan Map that is expected during implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Land Use Classification Change from Institutional to Residential High Density (Map 12-1): This is an applicant-initiated request to change property from an Institutional land use classification to Residential High Density land use classification. The property is located at 101-405 Dove View Drive, just north of Delaware Route 8 between Saulsbury Road and the Modern Maturity Center. It was previously approved under a PND: Senior Citizen Housing Option, as senior apartments. The applicant wishes to develop as apartments without an age restriction. (Z-11-03) Ordinance Number: 2011-03 File Number: MI-11-01

MI-11-01 – 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Report to City Council – March 14, 2011 Page 2 Project Background: The 2008 Comprehensive Plan was adopted by City Council on February 9, 2008, and subsequently amended on November 23, 2009, in conjunction with the 2009 Comprehensive Rezoning Project. As adopted, the Comprehensive Plan sets forth a process by which the Comprehensive Plan can be amended on an annual basis. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan can be initiated by staff or requested by members of the public. For amendments to the Comprehensive Plan that involve rezoning of property, the requests are processed concurrently. The process to amend the Comprehensive Plan is detailed in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 15: Implementation, specifically on pages 183 and 184 of the Plan. The proposed amendments are detailed below and represented in the attachments. The attachments include: a) Proposed Revisions to Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix; b) Map 12-1A – amendments to the Land Development Plan Map; and c) Table entitled “2011 City of Dover Land Development Plan Map Changes 12-1” – listing of all parcels proposed to be amended in the proposed amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. 1. Land Use and Zoning Matrix (Table 12-1) The amendments to the Land Use and Zoning Matrix (Table 12-1) are also changes brought forward by staff as a follow up to the 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning Project – Recreational and Open Space Zone (ROS). As adopted in February 2009 and subsequently amended in November 2009, the Land Use and Zone Matrix states for Open Space: Land Use Category Zoning District Lands that are shown on the Land Development Plan as Open Space are not proposed for rezoning. They will remain as zoned as of this printing. Once Open Space an Open Space Zone is developed, some areas will be proposed for rezoning to this designation. Following the creation of the Recreational and Open Space Zone (ROS) and the process of applying this zone to properties shown as Open Space on the Land Development Plan Map, staff is bringing forward a revision to this table to remove the above text and add ROS (Recreational and Open Space) and RC (Recreational and Commercial) to the Land Use and Zoning Matrix as compatible zones with the Open Space land use classification, as reflected below. (Attachment 1) Land Use Category Zoning District ROS (Recreational and Open Space Open Space RC (Recreational and Commercial) 2. Land Development Plan Map Changes Related to Open Space (Map 12-1)

MI-11-01 – 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Report to City Council – March 14, 2011 Page 3 These amendments to Land Development Plan Map (Map 12-1) are map corrections brought forward by staff as a follow-up to the 2010 Comprehensive Rezoning Project – Recreational and Opens Space Zone (ROS). During the process of applying the newly-created ROS zone to areas identified as Open Space in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan (Map 12-1: Land Development Plan), staff identified a number of parcels that were shown as Open Space, but had non-open space uses. These parcels are typically adjacent to open space areas, such as parks and cemeteries, and they had been shaded as Open Space in development of the Land Development Plan Map (Map 12-1). The amendments brought forward would categorize the lands in a manner consistent with their present use, zoning, and surroundings. (Identified as items 1-16 on Attachment 3) 3. Land Use Classification Change from Institutional to Residential High Density (Map 12-1) This proposed amendment is an applicant-initiated amendment, where the applicant is requesting that certain properties located north of Forrest Avenue (Delaware Route 8) west of Saulsbury Road be changed from Institutional land use classification to Residential High Density land use classification. This is associated with application number Z-11-03 Lands of CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC. (Identified as 17 on Attachment 3) The affected parcel is ED-05-076.07-01-30.00-000. According to the applicant: Doveview was approved by the City as an aged restricted apartment complex under the Planned Neighborhood Design Senior Housing Option. The approved project consists of 192 units within 4 – four story buildings. Construction stopped in 2008, leaving two partially completed, four-story buildings. CRM Mid-Atlantic obtained ownership of the project through foreclosure proceedings. As the senior housing market is no longer financially viable due to current economic conditions, CRM Mid- Atlantic LLC requests that a comprehensive plan amendment and change in zone to allow the apartments to be rented by the general public. The current land use designation and zoning are institutional and institutional/office (IO), respectively. CRM Mid-Atlantic LLC seeks a change in the land use designation to high density residential, and to rezone the property to general residence (RG-5). RG-5 is the only zone that will permit the existing four story apartment buildings to remain without requiring a variance in the height and number of stories from the Board of Adjustment. Although RG-5 allows for higher density (approx 326 units), the number of units that can actually exist on this property is dictated by the parking requirements in the zoning code. Doveview (as approved) has 246 parking spaces, which is 1.3 spaces per unit. Rezoning to RG-5 requires 2.25 parking spaces per unit. Doveview is located in an area surrounded by commercial, institutional, and residential uses. The requested zoning is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan because Doveview is close to services, jobs, and transit. The subject parcel was previously approved as DoveView Apartments, a Planned Neighborhood Design – Senior Citizen Housing Option. Under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in Article 3 §24 for the Planned Neighborhood Design Option (File Number C-03-08 and C-06-02), a property zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone) is permitted to be considered for development with the PND: Senior Citizen Housing Option through the Conditional Use review process.

MI-11-01 – 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Report to City Council – March 14, 2011 Page 4 The DoveView PND – Senior Citizen Housing Option plan included 192 dwelling units in four four-story apartment buildings. The plan as approved would include 246 parking spaces and an overall density of 28.52 dwelling units per acre. The City issued building permits for the four buildings that make up DoveView in late 2007 and early 2008. Construction began on two buildings and ultimately ceased. The property went into foreclosure and is now owned by CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC (Sun Trust Bank). Because construction ceased for more than one year, the site development plan associated with DoveView has expired (Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 §2.491(a)). Site development plan approval is required prior to initiation of any construction activity on the site, regardless of the outcome of the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan. Regarding High Density Residential uses, on Chapter 12 – Land Development, page 147 and 148, the 2008 Comprehensive Plan recommends the following: The Comprehensive Land Development Plan recommends that high density residential be dispersed throughout the City along arterial roadways in close proximity to other high-density residential uses, schools, neighborhood commercial areas, transit service, and other compatible non-residential land use areas. High density residential development is also appropriate in some areas of the downtown, most of which are shown as mixed use on the Land Development Plan. The subject site is located off Saulsbury Road and Delaware Route 8, both of which are identified as Urban Minor Arterials in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. It is also within proximity (walking distance) to schools (Booker T. Washington Elementary School, William Henry Middle School, and the Academy of Dover), commercial areas (including the TD Bank and Walgreens Drug Store on adjacent parcels and the Gateway West Shopping Center to the south, across Forrest Avenue), transit service, and other services (including medical offices). Recommendation of the Planning Staff and Planning Commission: 1. Land Use and Zoning Matrix (Table 12-1) Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend in favor of the amendments to Table 12-1, the Land Use and Zoning Matrix. The proposed amendments add clarification to the table as a result of the creation and implementation of the Recreational and Open Space Zone (ROS). 2. Land Development Plan Map Changes Related to Open Space (Map 12-1) Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend in favor or the amendments to correct areas erroneously reflected as Open Space on the Land Development Plan Map as depicted in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan (as amended on 11/23/2009). These are corrections of mapping errors found in applying the Recreational and Open Space Zone (ROS). These are identified as items # 1-16 in Attachment 3. 3. Land Use Classification Change from Institutional to Residential High Density (Map 12-1)

MI-11-01 – 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Report to City Council – March 14, 2011 Page 5 Staff recommends in favor of changing the land use classification of property north of Forrest Avenue and west of Saulsbury Road, known as DoveView from Institutional to Residential High Density land use classification. This is identified as item # 17 in Attachment 3. Staff also believes that the proposed rezoning supports the articulated need for affordable housing within the City of Dover. This need is articulated in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, and has also been consistently articulated by City Council at their annual retreats. The location of the site near the intersection of two Urban Minor Arterial streets, within walking distance to a variety of goods and services, and served by public transportation, make this a suitable site for high density residential development. Additionally, one of the challenges typically encountered when considering high density residential development is the resistance from residential neighbors living in lower density residential developments. This location is not directly adjacent to other, lower density residential development that would generate these types of conflicts. All Staff recommendations were made prior to the public hearing before the Planning Commission. Following a public hearing on February 22, 2011, where several members of the public spoke with regards to the requested Land Development Plan change #3, the Planning Commission voted to recommend in favor of the proposed amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan with seven members voting in favor and two members absent. Attachments: Attachment 1 – Proposed Revisions to Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix Attachment 2 – Map 12-1A Attachment 3 – Table entitled “2011 City of Dover Land Development Plan Map Changes 12-1” Attachment 4 – Excerpt from the DRAFT Minutes of the February 22, 2011 meeting of the Planning Commission

Attachment 1 Table 12-1 Land Use and Zoning Matrix Land Use Category Zoning District R-20 (One Family Residential) R-15 (One Family Residential) Residential Low Density R-10 (One Family Residential) R-8 (One Family Residential) R-7 (One Family Residential) C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) R-8 (One Family Residential) R-7 (One Family Residential) RM-1 (Medium Density Residential) RM-2 (Medium Density Residential) Residential Medium Density RG-1 (General Residential) RG-2 (General Residential) RG-3 (Group Housing) RGO (General Residence and Office) C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) MHP (Mobile Home Park) RM-2 (Medium Density Residential) RGO (General Residence and Office) RG-1 (General Residential) RG-2 (General Residential) Residential High Density RG-3 (Group Housing Residential) RG-4 (High Rise Residential) RG-5 (Mid Rise Residential) MHP (Mobile Home Park) C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) C-1A (Limited Commercial) C-2 (Central Commercial) C-2A (Limited Central Commercial) C-3 (Service Commercial) C-4 (Highway Commercial) Commercial SC-1 (Shopping Center Commercial) SC-2 (Shopping Center Commercial) SC-3 (Shopping Center Commercial) RC (Recreational and Commercial) RGO (General Residence and Office) CPO (Commercial/Professional Office) IO (Institutional and Office) January 3, 2011 Page 1

C-2 (Central Commercial) (Downtown Target Area Only) C-2A (Limited Central Commercial) TND (Traditional Neighborhood Design) C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) C-1A (Limited Commercial) RGO (General Residence and Office) Mixed-Use (Downtown Target Area Only) R-8 (One Family Residence) R-10 (One Family Residence) RG-1 (General Residence) RG-2 (General Residence) RG-4 (Multi-Story Apartments) C-3 (Service Commercial) CPO (Commercial/Professional Office) IO (Institutional and Office) M (Manufacturing) Industrial and Public Utilities IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing) IPM-2 (Technology Center Manufacturing) C-3 (Service Commercial) IO (Institutional and Office) Institutional Institutional uses may be conditionally permitted in residential zones CPO (Commercial/Professional Office) Office and Office Parks IO (Institutional and Office) IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing) RGO (General Residence and Office) Active Agriculture A (Agriculture) ROS (Recreational and Open Space Open Space RC (Recreational and Commercial) January 3, 2011 Page 2

City of Dover, Delaware Map 12-1 Land Development Plan DRAFT Legend Active Agriculture Commercial DoverAFB Industrial and Public Utilities Institutional Mixed Use Office Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential High Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Train Track Water Dover Boundary Dover Parcels µ 0 As Amended March 14, 2011 1,100 2,200 DRAFT 4,400 6,600 8,800 Feet Map Created By: Planning Office Date Map Created: 3-4-11 Date Map Printed: 3-4-11

City of Dover, Delaware Map 12-1A Land Development Plan DRAFT Legend Institutional Residential High Density Proposed Change from Residential Low Density Open Space, Conservation, Recreation to Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Dover Boundary Dover Parcels Proposed Change from Open Space, Conservation, Recreation to Residential Medium Density Proposed Change from Institutional to Residential High Density Proposed Change from Open Space, Conservation, Recreation to Institutional µ 0 As Amended March 14, 2011 1,100 2,200 DRAFT 4,400 6,600 8,800 Feet Map Created By: Planning Office Date Map Created: 12-14-10 Date Map Printed: 12-20-10

2011 City of Dover Land Development Plan Map Changes 12‐1 (MI‐11‐01) Proposed Land Use Current Proposed Planning Commission City Council ID Parcel # Property Address Existing Land Use Classification Use Reference Staff Recommendation Classification Zoning Zoning Recommendation Recommendation 1 ED‐05‐076.20‐03‐31.01 1134 Westview Terrace Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Low Density Residential R‐10 R‐10 Staff correction Residential Low Density Residential Low Density 2 ED‐05‐086.05‐01‐08.00 60 Lynnhaven Dr. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Low Density Residential R‐10 R‐10 Staff correction Residential Low Density Residential Low Density 3 ED‐05‐086.05‐01‐09.00 1102 S. Governors Ave. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Institutional Institutional IO IO Staff correction Institutional Institutional 4 ED‐05‐076.13‐04‐36.00 125 Westover Dr. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Medium Density Residential RM‐1 RM‐1 Staff correction Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 5 ED‐05‐067.14‐01‐24.00 127 Oakmont Dr. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Low Density Residential R‐10 R‐10 Staff correction Residential Low Density Residential Low Density 7 ED‐05‐067.00‐03‐07.00 Seskinore Ct. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Low Density Vacant RM‐1 RM‐1 Staff correction Residential Low Density Residential Low Density 8 ED‐05‐067.14‐03‐49.00 54 Hitching Post Dr. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Medium Density Residential R‐8 R‐8 Staff correction Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 9 ED‐05‐068.19‐01‐37.00 115 Nixon Ln. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Medium Density Residential R‐20 R‐20 Staff correction Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 10 ED‐05‐068.15‐01‐09.00 349 Acorn Ln. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Medium Density Residential R‐10 R‐10 Staff correction Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 11 ED‐05‐068.15‐01‐06.00 365 Acorn Ln. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Medium Density Residential R‐10 R‐10 Staff correction Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 12 ED‐05‐068.15‐01‐08.00 409 Acorn Ln. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Medium Density Residential R‐10 R‐10 Staff correction Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 13 ED‐05‐068.09‐01‐54.00 637 Vista Ave. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Medium Density Residential RG‐3 RG‐3 Staff correction Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 14 ED‐05‐068.13‐01‐03.00 600 Pennsylvania Ave. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Medium Density Residential R‐8 R‐8 Staff correction Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 15 ED‐05‐068.17‐01‐25.00 555 Pennsylvania Ave. Open Space and Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential R‐8 R‐8 Staff correction Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 16 ED‐05‐086.05‐01‐01.00 1052 S. Governors Ave. Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Residential Low Density Vacant R‐10 R‐10 Staff correction Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 17 ED‐05‐076.07‐01‐30.00 101‐405 DoveView Dr. Institutional Residential High Density Vacant IO RG‐5 Z‐11‐03 Residential High Density Residential High Density Attachement 3 Table for Land Development Plan Map Changes 12‐1 2‐22‐11

Attachment 4 – Excerpt from DRAFT Minutes of the February 22, 2011 Meeting of the Planning Commission (Minutes scheduled for adoption on March 21, 2011) MI-11-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2011 - Public Hearing and Review for Recommendation to City Council of a series of Amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, as amended, by replacing Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix and Map 12-1: Land Development Plan. The amendment to Table 12-1 is to add zoning classifications to the Open Space land use classification in the Land Use and Zoning Matrix. The series of amendments to Map 12-1: Land Development Plan Map will revise the Land Use Classification from Open Space for certain properties to more appropriate classifications based on the property uses and surrounding uses. Representative: Staff Mrs. Townshend stated that there are two (2) Staff recommended changes to the Comprehensive Plan. Both are fine tuning things that happen as the Plan is implemented. You will recall that back in July; the Planning Commission looked at the rezoning of properties to the Recreational and Open Space (ROS) zoning classification that had been created earlier in 2010. When Staff was going through to determine which properties to bring forward for rezoning to that classification, we picked up some errors. Essentially, areas that for example may have been a house that somehow were made green on the Land Development Plan Map. We did not bring forward a recommendation to rezone the uses that are not consistent with the Open Space classification to the Recreational and Open Space zoning. The first part of this application is to correct the areas that were picked up in the green areas on the Development Plan Map which is what is expected in the Comprehensive Rezoning phases when you get into more of the parcel level analysis rather than the broad brush that you do at the Comprehensive Plan level. Mrs. Townshend further stated that if you look at the table that was included in your packet, you are looking at numbers 1 through 16 which are essentially properties that were painted green in the Comprehensive Plan that when we went to apply that zoning classification, we determined that this was not in fact the current use or the intended used for those areas. This is a clean-up for the Comprehensive Plan. Mrs. Townshend further stated that the second part of this relates to the implementation of the Recreational and Open Space Zone. Staff is proposing a number of amendments to the Land Development Plan chapter in the Land Use and Zoning Matrix which is Table 12-1 of the Comprehensive Plan that would, instead of having the language of: “Lands that are on the Land Development Plan as Open Space are not proposed for rezoning. They will remain as zoned as of this printing. Once an Open Space Zone is developed, some areas will be proposed for rezoning for this designation.” Following the implementation of the Open Space Zone or what turned out to be the Recreational and Open Space Zone, recommendation is to amend this Table as it relates to Open Space by putting the ROS (Recreation and Open Space Zone) and the RC (Recreational and Commercial Zone) as the appropriate zoning classifications for that Land Use category. Mr. Hemmig questioned if there were any Commission member comments or questions at this time and there were none. Mr. Hemmig questioned that the second part of the Open Space is going to be Recreational and Commercial Zone, what is the commercial part? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mrs. Townshend stated that these two zoning classifications are the classifications that would be acceptable in this area. When Staff was looking at what to rezone to recreation and open space areas, the Maple Dale Country Club is shown as Open Space in the Comprehensive Plan. They had some concerns about rezoning that as it would take them from Recreational and Commercial Zone to the Recreational and Open Space Zone. At the time of the proposed rezoning, they voiced their concerns on the record and the decision was recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by City Council to have them retain their zoning of RC. When you look at what the appropriate land use classifications are, it makes more sense to change the table then it would to change the map. Mr. Hemmig further questioned regarding Table 12-1 where there are general land use categories and low and high density, he noticed certain zonings are in more than one category. Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mrs. Townshend

Attachment 4 – Excerpt from DRAFT Minutes of the February 22, 2011 Meeting of the Planning Commission stated that essentially, the intent of this Table is to give guidance so that when a rezoning application comes before the City, the Planning Commission, City Council and Staff that you can use that Table as a basis to determine if this is what the Comprehensive Plan intended. In some cases, for instance, a zoning classification that falls into more than one would be the R-8 which is a one family classification. It is a single family detached zoning designation which has some of the lower density attributes; however, it is a higher density than some of the others. Mrs. Townshend further stated that in terms of #3 listed in the report this is being pulled out entirely. It will be brought forward next month as a separate amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The other applicant initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment is a change in classification from Institutional to Residential High Density. Mr. Hemmig questioned if there was a representative at the meeting for DoveView and if they would please come down to the podium. Representative: Mr. Gregg Moore, Becker Morgan Group, Inc. representing Sun Trust Bank. Mrs. Townshend stated that in the report what you have is the verbiage provided by the applicant to justify the change in the Comprehensive Plan as well as the analysis of Staff. Essentially, DoveView, if you will recall, was previously approved as a Senior Citizen Housing Option project under the PND for 192 dwelling units and age restricted for 55 aged and over. The apartments were under construction and construction ceased in about 2008 and nothing has moved forward. What we have now is two (2) partially completed buildings and an expired Site Plan. Regardless of the zoning classification and whether it remains what it is zoned now or whether it is rezoned, you will see it back as a Site Development Plan application. Mrs. Townshend further stated that the applicant is requesting to use the housing style and the housing density that was approved for DoveView, but not have it age restricted. It is clear that they will not be able to achieve the number of units that DoveView was approved for because there are parking issues. DoveView did not provide 2.25 parking spaces per unit because when it was senior housing it was less. She believes, based on what DelDOT recommended during the PLUS review, that there will be a Traffic Impact Study required or at least the discussion of that with the potential of paying into the area-wide study. What they are looking to do is utilize the infrastructure that was put in place for DoveView and to capture a portion of that density through multi-story apartment buildings; however, not age restricted. They are requesting, in terms of the Comprehensive Plan, a change to Residential High Density in terms of the zoning which will be #3 on the agenda; they are requesting RG-5. This will be a separate action by the Planning Commission once the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is dealt with because the two are tied together. It is important that the applicant speaks on the matter and that the public speak during the public hearing. Mr. Moore stated that Sun Trust Bank has been in suit with the previous developer DoveView, LLC and prevailed in that suit. Around the 16th to the 20th of February a new deed was filed in the name of the bank and that deed is CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC which was setup by the bank to own it. This transfer to the bank has just occurred in the last week or ten days and what the bank is trying to do is act quickly and get this property back into productive use. They want to clean the property up and bring on a developer to continue to build or rebuild these buildings. They understand to do that they have to go back through the Site Plan process and have talked to Staff with regards to the process of doing that. We, at Becker Morgan Group, have evaluated the plan and believe that there will be significantly less units than you have seen before in an RG-5 project with 2.25 parking spaces per unit under the RG-5 zoning classification. It was 1.25 with the senior project with 246 parking spaces to serve 192 units. Mr. Moore further stated that they have done a Concept Plan for the bank and have estimated for them the total number of units as an RG-5 project would be somewhere around 120 and 144 units not 190, so it is coming down significantly. We believe that a whole building will be dropped off of the plan as there will not be four (4) buildings; however, there will be no more than three (3). There will be fewer units with less folks on the property with it being a non-senior project. The banks intention is to sell this project to a developer who will be the entity that reconstructs, operates, owns, and managers the new project once we get it conceived and the bank is prepared to continue through the Site Plan process. We also need to go through a complete building evaluation to make sure we do the right thing with these buildings because they have been sitting there for a number of years. There are structural and environmental evaluations that they are doing to make sure that we properly bring these buildings back into service without causing a problem. Mr. Hemmig opened a public hearing.

Attachment 4 – Excerpt from DRAFT Minutes of the February 22, 2011 Meeting of the Planning Commission Mr. Leonard Iacono - Stated that he has some concerns regarding what the request is. From afar, he has been following this project as a major developer in the area. From what he understands, this original project was initially approved for condominiums. There was then a trade-off done changing it from a condominium unit to allow for age restricted apartments. He questions the validity of putting out and lifting age restricted requirements given what the original intent was. He does not know where all of this is going at the end of the day; however, if he is correct, this is the history here. He personally thinks that it should stay that way. Mrs. Carolyn Fredericks – Executive Director, Modern Maturity Center – Stated that she believes that there is a great need for affordable senior housing in Dover. She understands the buildings need to have some work done and obviously she would like to have a nice neighbor there as well. Her concern is, and we have filed the appropriate paperwork, to get rid of the connectivity between the two properties should the zoning be changed. Mr. James Hutchison – 15 Glen Eagles Court- Stated that he is currently a board member of the Modern Maturity Center and for the record, he feels that it is very important that you keep in mind the Modern Maturity Center has over 20,000 members. When he looks next door at the DoveView Apartments, the complex itself was originally designed for senior citizens that have changed. Making it compatible between the two facilities is not so at this point. He would urge all of you to consider that for a public safety point of view. When he looks at the number of people who are going in and out of the senior center every single day many of these people are much older than average and have disabilities and some have severe disabilities. So again, I urge you to look at this as far as any connection between roadways for the application and the Modern Maturity Center. Mr. Hemmig stated with regards to clarification we are not considering any connection tonight on whether it should exist or not. That will be a separate application by the Modern Maturity Center should they desire to bring that forward. Tonight, we are only considering the land use consideration and the rezoning of that property. Mrs. Joyce Breasure-Herrick – President, Modern Maturity Center - Stated that she would like to encourage you to consider the wonderful opportunity Dover has to use the facility, the Modern Maturity Center and have dedicated senior citizen housing which we desperately need in Kent County and specifically in Dover. What a wonderful environment it would be for someone to be able to come out of the apartment or condominium cross a little bridge, come into our facility for medical services, physical therapy services, lunch, line dancing, art classes, and higher education classes. It needs to be 55-plus housing as we desperately need the housing. Mr. Hemmig closed the public hearing after seeing no one else wishing to speak. Mr. Hemmig stated that he would like to clarify that the Commission is considering Items #1 thru #17 on the Land Use Classification Map. Items #18 through #21 apply to the item that was taken off of the agenda this evening. Under the proposed amendments, we are considering Items #1, 2 and 4 for Land Use Classifications under MI-11-01 application. Colonel Welsh stated that while not applicable at this time his concern has to do with the senior housing as DoveView. He does not know the details as to why construction stopped on DoveView. He would assume it has something to do with finances. He does not know if it had anything to do with demand. While all of us envisioned having senior housing and hoped that it would be, it certainly has been an eyesore for a couple of years. The question is do we continue with the eyesore or do we go with someone who will move forward with this project and develop it as something other than the original intent of senior housing. Did they not foresee a need for senior housing in the area? Responding to Colonel Welsh, Mr. Moore stated that the bank has been trying to find a partner/developer to take the project on as it has been in a lawsuit trying to get control of the property and has not been able to find any partner or developer to take it on as a full senior development. The bank believes that this is because of the market as it has dropped significantly for senior housing. They believe to be able to market this property and bring it back into use. They are going to need to be able to do that with more than just senior apartments given the realities of what has happened. Their goal is to bring it back into code compliant construction standards and continue the construction. They need to be able to do that with the diversity of the housing with not just the senior option.

Attachment 4 – Excerpt from DRAFT Minutes of the February 22, 2011 Meeting of the Planning Commission Colonel Welsh further questioned if there was no chance that the bank may be willing to stay with it to try and find a developer for senior housing? Responding to Colonel Welsh, Mr. Moore stated that the bank does not feel that it is viable as a senior only project. Mr. Hemmig questioned if Sun Trust Bank or your firm as representative or the potential developer has done any actual market surveys to indicate that a rental apartment would be as or more viable than a senior housing apartment? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mr. Moore stated that they have met with, talked with, and negotiated with developers to take it over. They will be bringing a partner in to actually do the construction because they are a bank and this is not what they do so they have relied on their partners. The name that this comes from, CRM Mid- Atlantic, actually has the expertise and that is what they are drawing on to make that conclusion which is why he is here tonight. Mr. Tolbert asked if their plan is to develop the site for both senior citizens as well as others? Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Mr. Moore stated that yes they would. As you have heard this from other developers such as the Seskinore project which was one that started as simply a senior project and struggled in being able to market to others than just seniors. They came back and said that they could have a more viable project if they could open up to non-seniors. Clearly this is a good position for senior apartments as they have elevators and the project can be good for seniors to live there; however, at a 140 plus or minus units, we do not believe that it is viable in this market to be able to bring it back into and pump the money in that is necessary to redo the buildings. Mr. Tolbert further stated that the question that comes to mind is that when you develop a site for seniors as well as others, seniors require additional kinds of amenities in their apartments than people who are under senior citizen age, would that not be a problem? Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Mr. Moore stated that no in fact, the two buildings that are there, their strategy will be to follow through on the way that they were being built to accommodate only seniors. Our project will accommodate seniors and will attract seniors in a large way; we do believe that. However, we do not believe that at the numbers we are at, the senior housing is viable with just seniors. We need to have the opportunity to get others to make it financially viable for a developer and reconstruction of the buildings. There is significant reconstruction to consider in these buildings because they have been open for so long. They have environmental issues, there are some structural issues and they are evaluating those; so, it is not like they are just going to come in and start putting siding on these buildings. There is a lot of money that needs to be pumped in to some degree to go backwards a little before we can go forward to get them into a code compliant component of a building. Colonel Welsh stated that this is the thought process that he had as we were going along and we heard the testimony from the public. Just because it is no longer age restricted does not mean that seniors cannot obviously rent an apartment there and move in and still have full use of the Modern Maturity Center and the other facilities. It is an ideal location with the bank right there, Walgreens, and the Modern Maturity Center. He would think this would attract a great number of seniors. Responding to Colonel Welsh, Mr. Moore stated that the bank and the developers that they have talked to have the same idea. There will be a large amount of seniors that will want to come here because of the position of where it is and what it offers. The numbers are just not strong enough to revitalize the whole project. Mr. Ambruso questioned what they are voting on separately? Responding to Mr. Ambruso, Mr. Hemmig stated on the proposed amendment there are three (3) items. The first item will be the Land Use and Zoning Matrix Table to include the new Recreational and Open Space Zone and the Recreational and Commercial Zone. The second item is the Land Development Map plan change Items #1 through #17 to change the existing land use classification to what is shown as proposed. To take them out of Open Space and put them into one of the various residential or institutional land use classifications. The third item will be the specific land use classification change from institutional to Residential High Density for what is known as the DoveView apartments. Their zoning will be a separate issue. Colonel Welsh moved to forward to City Council approval of MI-11-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2011 to adopt the Land Use Table and the changes associated with it. That we adopt the map that depicts the Land Use changes (Items #1-16) and that we make a recommendation to change the Land Use classification for DoveView Apartments (Item #17). This excludes Items #18 through #21 on the Land Development Plan Map changes. Seconded by Mr. Tolbert and the motion was unanimously carried 7-0 with Mr. Friedman and Mr. Holt absent.

CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 2011 APPLICATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 2011 FILE #: MI-11-01 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Public Utilities Department CONTACT PERSON: Steve Enss - Electric Sharon Duca, P.E. - Water, Wastewater, Stormwater CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7070 T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER 1. Our office has no objections to the proposed amendments. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER 1. None ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER 1. None. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .

CITY OF DOVER D E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE L APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D O D.A.C. MEETING DATE: February 3, 2011 T =============================================================== APPLICATION: Comprehensive Plan Amendments FILE#: MI-11-01 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT CONTACT PERSON: Julio F. Seneus PHONE#: 760-2145 =============================================================== THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: DelDOT has no comments. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: A pre-submittal meeting with the applicant will be required, if the proposed development generates 200 vehicles per day (VPD). If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person and the planning department as soon as possible.

STATE OF DELAWARE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF STATE PLANNING COORDINATION February 22, 2011 Ms. Ann Marie Townshend Planning Director City of Dover P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 RE: PLUS review – 2011-01-03; City of Dover Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Ms. Townshend: Thank you for meeting with State agency planners on January 26, 2011 to discuss the proposed comprehensive plan amendment for the City of Dover. According to the information received, you are seeking 2 amendments that relate to the implementation of the City’s Recreational and Open Space (ROS) zone and two amendments that are accompanied by rezoning applications. Please note that changes to the plan, other than those suggested in this letter, could result in additional comments from the State. Additionally, these comments reflect only issues that are the responsibility of the agencies represented at the meeting. ‘ Office of State Planning Coordination – Contact: David Edgell The Office of State Planning Coordination would like to note that there are no certification issues associated with the proposed four amendments to the City of Dover Comprehensive Plan. We would like to request that the City of Dover consider the agency recommendations found below when they are evaluating these plan amendments. The approval procedures are found at the end of this letter. Our office must be informed regarding the final approval and adoption of these amendments. The format of the final plan amendment is up to the City, but please be sure to present the information in a way that can be integrated into your plan and properly tracked. We will always need to be sure that we are referencing the most current version of your comprehensive plan. Recommendations: Our office strongly recommends that the City consider these recommendations from the various State agencies as you review your plan amendment for final approval. 122 William Penn Street ⋅ Third Floor ⋅ Dover, DE 19901 Phone (302)739‐3090 ⋅ Fax (302) 739‐6958 ⋅ www. stateplanning.delaware.gov

PLUS 2011-01-03 Page 2 of 5 This office has received the following comments from State agencies: Department of Transportation – Contact: Bill Brockenbrough 760-2109 DelDOT is not opposed to the subject plan amendment. The staff-initiated amendments appear to have no significant transportation impacts. While the applicant-initiated amendments will have no immediate transportation impacts themselves, they will enable developments that will have such impacts as noted below: • The proposed applicant-initiated amendment from Institutional (senior apartments) to Residential High Density (apartments without an age restriction) would potentially increase the daily trip generation of those apartments by a factor of two and the peak hour trip generation of those apartment by a factor of four. Consequently, the apartments would likely meet DelDOT’s volume warrants for a Traffic Impact Study (TIS), as contained in Section 2.3.1 of DelDOT’s Standards and Regulations for Subdivision Streets and State Highway Access, i.e. 400 trips per day or 50 trips during the weekday peak hour. If the development would generate less than 2,000 trips per day and less than 200 trips during the weekday peak hour, and the City does not require a TIS, then in accordance with Section 2.3.2 of the Standards and Regulations, we may permit them to pay the Area Wide Study Fee in lieu of performing a TIS. The Area Wide Study Fee would be calculated as $10 per daily trip and would be payable prior to the re-issuance of a Letter of No Objection. Payment of it would exempt the developer from the need to do a TIS, but would not exempt them from participation in off-site improvements or the need to do a Traffic Operational Analysis if one is required in the re-review of their entrance plans. If the City does not require a TIS and the developer would like to pay the fee in lieu of doing a TIS, the developer should contact our Subdivision Manager for northern Kent County, Mr. Julio Seneus, at (302) 760-2145. If the developer would like to proceed with the TIS, they should contact Mr. Troy Brestel of our Development Coordination Section to arrange for a scoping meeting. Mr. Brestel may be reached at (302) 760-2167. • While DelDOT lacks sufficient information to determine the trip generation of what might be developed on the property near State College Road, it appears to be large enough that DelDOT’s volume warrants for a Traffic Impact Study (TIS), as contained in Section 2.3.1 of the Standards and Regulations, i.e. 400 trips per day or 50 trips during the weekday peak hour, could be met. DelDOT anticipates commenting further on both developments when they see specific proposals through the City’s Development Advisory Committee process.

PLUS 2011-01-03 Page 3 of 5 The Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control – Contact: Kevin Coyle 739-9071 Regarding tax parcels ED-05-067.00-02-53.00 through -56.00 • The largest parcel in this group abuts Fork Branch and given the ‘High Density’ land-use change proposed, DNREC is concerned about forest loss and an adequate buffer being left intact along Fork Branch. There are rare species associated with Fork Branch including a heron rookery and bald eagle nest upstream. If these parcels are developed, efforts should be made to avoid forest removal and leave the riparian buffer along Fork Branch intact to protect species and habitat of concern. • Recommendations include: o Maintain the integrity of the wooded area on the parcel in its entirety (recognizing the City’s 50% protection requirement). o Limit the extent of development (regardless of zoning classification) to the open space on the site. o Employ stormwater best management practices to minimize impacts (erosion and habitat destruction, as well as non-point source pollution) to the Fork Branch Natural Area. Regarding tax parcel ED-05-086.05-01-01.00 • Leaving a buffer which is adequate (at least 100 feet in width) for water quality protection and wildlife habitat along the St. Jones is recommended. If the rezonings are approved, DNREC would remind the City of the following when development occurs: Tank Management Branch. Please be aware: • If a release of a Regulated Substance occurs at the proposed project site, compliance of 7 Del.C. Chapter 60, 7 Del.C., Chapter 74 and DE Admin. Code 1351, State of Delaware Regulations Governing Underground Storage Tank Systems (the UST Regulations) is required. • There is one (1) inactive LUST project located within a quarter mile of the College Road Property portion of the Comprehensive Plan: Jemm Investors, Facility: 1-000385, Project: K9208210. No environmental impact is anticipated from this LUST project.

PLUS 2011-01-03 Page 4 of 5 • Per the UST Regulations: Part E, § 1. Reporting Requirements: o “Any indication of a Release of a Regulated Substance that is discovered by any Person, including but not limited to environmental consultants, contractors, utility companies, financial institutions, real estate transfer companies, UST Owners or Operators, or Responsible Parties shall be reported within 24 hours to: ƒ The Department’s 24-hour Release Hot Line by calling 800-662-8802; and ƒ The DNREC, Tank Management Branch (TMB) by calling 302-395- 2500.” Hazardous Waste Sites. • DNREC's Site Investigation and Restoration Branch (SIRB) encourages the development of Brownfields and can provide assistance when investigating and remediating Brownfield sites. Although SIRB has no specific comments regarding the proposed comprehensive plan amendment at this time, if any future development occurs on sites with previous manufacturing, industrial, or agricultural use, SIRB recommends that a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment be conducted prior to development, due to the potential for a release of hazardous substances. If a release or imminent threat of a release of hazardous substances is discovered during the course of future development (e.g., contaminated water or soil); construction activities should be discontinued immediately, and DNREC should be notified at the 24-hour emergency number (800-662-8802). In addition, SIRB should be contacted as soon as possible at 302-395-2600 for further instructions. Delaware State Housing Authority – Contact Karen Horton 739-4263 • DSHA encourages the City to support the applicant-initiated amendment to rezone the property, located at Dove View Drive, just north of Delaware Route 8 between Saulsbury Road and the Modern Maturity Center, from Institutional to Residential High Density. Currently the property has a foreclosed partially-completed senior apartment that is now a source of blight. We support this rezoning for the following reasons: o A rental community at this location will provide households with a fuller range of incomes close proximity to transit, jobs, services and markets. In turn, these densities will facilitate ridership of transit, as well as support the local markets that are within walking distance. o The development of a rental community would not preclude elderly residents which was the original plan for this site. o While large suburban homes have dominated development in Delaware for several decades, a growing body of research indicates that we are in the midst of a

PLUS 2011-01-03 Page 5 of 5 significant market shift. The baby boomers that once drove suburban development are now aging and are looking to downsize into something more manageable. The Delaware Population Consortium (DPC) projections for the next ten years indicate that not only will there be a large amount of suburban homes placed on the market by baby boomers, but that there will be a decline in households in age ranges that typically seek large homes. These same DPC projections show growth in the younger age ranges most likely at stages in their life and income to support apartments, condominiums and entry level homes. The combination of excess suburb housing supply currently on the market, additional supply being added by aging baby boomers, along with a changing market indicate that it is critical that communities proactively provide a variety of housing options to meet the needs of their residents. • DSHA encourages the City to support the applicant-initiated amendment to rezone the property, located north of College Road, just east of the railroad tracks from Industrial to Residential High Density. Our understanding is that the lack of road access, except through Mishoe Towers, precludes industrial use. For this reason and the reasons stated for the Dove View Drive rezoning request, we support this amendment. Approval Procedures: 1. Once all edits, changes and corrections have been made to the plan, please submit the completed document (text and maps) to our office for review. Your PLUS response letter should accompany this submission. Also include documentation about the public review process. In addition, please include documentation that the plan has been sent to other jurisdictions for review and comment, and include any comments received and your response to them. 2. The City shall report back to the Office of State Planning Coordination regarding adoption of any Review or Amendment, and forward the office any relevant meeting minutes, resolutions, ordinances and a copy of the final Plan Review or Amendment text and maps as adopted. Thank you for the opportunity to review this amendment. If you have any questions, please contact me at 302-739-3090. Sincerely, Constance C. Holland, AICP Office of State Planning Coordination Director

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE #2011-03 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY REPLACING TABLE 2 12-1: LAND USE AND ZONING MATRIX, AND MAP 12-1: LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3 4 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dover, on February 9, 2009, adopted the 2008 5 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Title 22, Section 702 of the Delaware Code; and 6 7 WHEREAS, the Honorable Jack Markell, Governor of the State of Delaware, certified the 2008 8 Comprehensive Plan on April 24, 2009; and 9 10 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dover, on November 23, 2009, adopted the 2009 11 Comprehensive Rezoning Project and 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and 12 13 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dover, on June 4, 2010, adopted an amendment to the Zoning 14 Ordinance creating the Recreational and Open Space Zone; and 15 16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dover, on August 9, 2010, adopted the 2010 Recreational 17 and Open Space Zone Map Amendments; and 18 19 WHEREAS, the 2008 Comprehensive Plan allows for an annual amendment process; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the Planning Staff has identified necessary changes to the Land Development Plan Map 22 (Map 12-1) and the Land Use and Zoning Matrix (Table 12-1) of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, as 23 amended on November 23, 2009; and 24 25 WHEREAS, two property owners have requested amendments to the Land Development Plan Map (Map 26 12-1) in accordance with the process set forth in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan; and 27 28 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 22, 2011, after which the 29 Commission made a recommendation in regards to the proposed amendments to the Land Development 30 Plan and the Land Use and Zoning Matrix. 31 32 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED THAT the Mayor and Council of the City of Dover hereby 33 amend Chapter 12: Land Development Plan, Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix and Map 12-1: 34 Land Development Plan of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, as amended on November 23, 2009, by 35 replacing the referenced table and map with the Amended Table 12-1 and Map 12-1 presented to City 36 Council on March 14, 2011. 37 38 ADOPTED: * 39 40 SYNOPSIS 41 The proposed ordinance would adopt amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive 42 Plan, as amended on November 23, 2009. 43 44 Actions History 45 March 14, 2011 - Final Reading – Council 46 January 24, 2011 - First Reading – Council

PETITION TO AMEND AND ZONING DISTRICT Public Hearing before the Dover City Council March 14, 2011 Applicants/Owners: CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC Sun Trust Bank Address: 101-405 DoveView Drive, Dover Location: North side of Forrest Avenue, west of Saulsbury Road Tax Parcel ID #: ED-05-076.07-01-30.00-000 Size: 6.735+/- acres Present Use: Vacant Apartment Buildings - partially constructed Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Institutional Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation: Residential High Density Present Zoning: IO (Institutional/Office Zone) COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) Proposed Zoning: RG-5 (General Residence for Mid-Rise Apartments Zone) COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) Reason for Request: To allow for the development of multi-family residential dwellings. File Number: Z-11-03

Z-11-03 Lands of CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC (DoveView Apartments) Report to City Council– March 14, 2011 Page 2 This rezoning application consists of one parcel of land, of approximately 6.735 acres, owned by CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC. The property is currently zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone), and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning is RG-5 (General Residence Zone for Mid-Rise Apartments). The subject area is located north of Forrest Avenue (Delaware Route 8) and west of Saulsbury Road. Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.07-01-30.00-000. The rezoning proposal is made in conjunction with a request to amend the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, Map 12-1 Land Development Plan, to change the subject parcel from Institutional land use classification to Residential High Density land use classification. Analysis of this request is in the report for file MI-11-01 – 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Existing Property: The subject parcel was previously approved as DoveView Apartments, a Planned Neighborhood Design – Senior Citizen Housing Option. Under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in Article 3 §24 for the Planned Neighborhood Design Option, a property zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone) is permitted to be considered for development with the PND: Senior Citizen Housing Option through the Conditional Use review process. The applications associated with this project include: C-03-08 – Approved by Planning Commission in February 2004 as FountainView PND – Senior Citizen Housing Option C-06-02 – Approved by Planning Commission in August 2006 as DoveView PND – Senior Citizen Housing Option. The Planning Commission granted a one-year extension in August 2007. The DoveView PND – Senior Citizen Housing Option plan included 192 dwelling units in four four-story apartment buildings. The plan as approved would include 246 parking spaces and an overall density of 28.52 dwelling units per acre. The City issued building permits for the four buildings that make up DoveView in late 2007 and early 2008. Construction began on two buildings and ultimately ceased. The property went into foreclosure and is now owned by CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC (Sun Trust Bank). Because construction ceased for more than one year, the site development plan associated with DoveView has expired (Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 §2.491(a)). Site development plan approval is required prior to initiation of any construction activity on the site, regardless of the outcome of the rezoning application. The subject property is located within the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) due to its location along Delaware Route 8 and Saulsbury Road. Any development of the site shall comply with the requirements of this zone. Surrounding Land Uses: There are a variety zoning classifications and land uses surrounding the subject property. Immediately south of the subject site, between the subject property and Forrest Avenue, are two properties that are zoned C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone); one is vacant, and the other is TD Bank. Other adjacent properties to the east between the subject site and Saulsbury Road are zoned C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) as well. Included among these is the Walgreens Drug Store located at the corner of Forrest Avenue and Saulsbury Road.

Z-11-03 Lands of CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC (DoveView Apartments) Report to City Council– March 14, 2011 Page 3 The property located to the north of the proposed site is zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and is the location of the Academy of Dover (school). Immediately west of the site is the Modern Maturity Center, which is zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone). Comprehensive Plan: In the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Plan (Map 12-1 as amended, dated 11/23/2009) recommends that this property be used for Institutional Uses. As previously stated, the rezoning request is associated with a request to amend the 2008 Comprehensive Plan to reflect the land use on Map 12-1 as Residential High Density. The requested zone is consistent with the requested land use classification, but not with the existing land use classification. The Land Development Plan (Chapter 12) of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan states the following with regard to high density residential development: The Comprehensive Land Development Plan recommends that high density residential be dispersed throughout the City along arterial roadways in close proximity to other high-density residential uses, schools, neighborhood commercial areas, transit service, and other compatible non-residential land use areas. High density residential development is also appropriate in some areas of the downtown, most of which are shown as mixed use on the Land Development Plan. The subject site is located off Saulsbury Road and Delaware Route 8, both of which are identified as Urban Minor Arterials in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. It is also within proximity (walking distance) to schools (Booker T. Washington Elementary School, William Henry Middle School, and the Academy of Dover), commercial areas (including the TD Bank and Walgreens Drug Store on adjacent parcels and the Gateway West Shopping Center to the south, across Forrest Avenue), transit service, and other services (including medical offices). Request for RG-5 (General Residence Zone for Mid-Rise Apartments) Within the RG-5 Zone, the following uses are permitted: one-family detached dwellings; mid- rise apartments; public buildings, structures and uses; raising of field and garden crops, vineyards and orchards, and nurseries. See Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 §5 and referenced sections. According to Article 12 of the Zoning Ordinance, the definition of mid-rise apartments is as follows: Mid-rise apartment: Multiple dwellings where individual dwelling units share a common outside access, and elevators serve each floor. The dwelling units share a common lot area, which is the sum of the required lot areas of all dwelling units within the building. The following is a summary of the bulk standards, as specified in Article 4, Section 4.6. The Zoning Ordinance defines Multiple Dwellings as “A building, or portion thereof, containing more than two dwelling units.”

Z-11-03 Lands of CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC (DoveView Apartments) Report to City Council– March 14, 2011 Page 4 For Multiple Dwellings: Minimum required: Lot area (sq. ft.) 900 per dwelling unit Lot width (ft.) 100 Lot depth (ft.) 125 Front yard (ft.) 25 At the ground level or at any setback level, one-sixth of the height of the nearest outside wall of the building measured in each case from the Side yard (ft.) average level of the finished grade along the side of the building, but in no case less than 25 feet. At the ground level or at any setback level, one-sixth of the height of the nearest outside wall of the building measured in each case from the Rear yard (ft.) average level of the finished grade along the rear of the building, but in no case less than 25 feet. Off-street parking 2/Du spaces Accessory commercial uses 1 per employee or 1 per 300 sq. ft. of floor area, whichever is greater. parking spaces 25% of the lot area shall be devoted to open area, not including parking Open space areas. Maximum permitted: Building height Stories 6 Feet 70 Recommendation of the Planning Staff and Planning Commission: This request is to rezone land from IO (Institutional and Office), subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) to RG-5 (General Residence Zone for Mid-Rise Apartments), subject to the COZ- 1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). This request is made in conjunction with a request to amend the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, Map 12-1 Land Development Plan, as it relates to this property. The approval of this rezoning request is contingent upon the approval of the associated amendment to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. As stated in the report for MI-11-01 – 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments, staff supports the land use classification change from Institutional to Residential High Density, and the associated rezoning of the subject property from IO (Institutional and Office) to RG-5 (General Residence

Z-11-03 Lands of CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC (DoveView Apartments) Report to City Council– March 14, 2011 Page 5 Zone for Mid-Rise Apartments). Staff believes that the rezoning and amendment to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with the policies stated in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan regarding location of high density residential uses. As previously stated, the subject property is within proximity to a variety of goods and services, including transit service, schools, places of employment, commercial uses, and other supporting services. Additionally, one of the challenges typically encountered when considering high density residential development is the resistance from residential neighbors living in lower density residential developments. This location is not directly adjacent to other, lower density residential development that would generate these types of conflicts. All Staff recommendations were made prior to the public hearing before the Planning Commission. Following a public hearing on February 22, 2011, where several members of the public spoke in opposition of the rezoning request, the Planning Commission voted to recommend in favor of the proposed amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan with six members voting in favor and one member voting against the request.

Z-11-03 Lands of CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC (DoveView Apartments) Report to City Council– March 14, 2011 Page 6 Excerpt from DRAFT Minutes of the February 22, 2011 Planning Commission Meeting (Minutes scheduled for adoption on March 21, 2011) Z-11-03 DoveView Apartments at 101-405 DoveView Drive – Public Hearing and Review for Recommendation to City Council on a rezoning application consists of one parcel of land totaling of 6.735 acres ±. The property is zoned IO (Institutional/Office Zone) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning is RG-5 (General Residence Zone for Mid-rise Apartments) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The property is located on the north side of Forrest Avenue (Route 8) just west of the Saulsbury Road intersection. The owner of record is CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC and SunTrust Bank. Property Addresses: 101-405 DoveView Drive. Tax Parcel: ED05-076.07-01-30.00-000. Council District 1. Ordinance #2011-05. Representatives: Mr. Gregg Moore, Becker Morgan Group, Inc. Mrs. Townshend stated that this application is similar to the previous application that you just saw in terms of surrounding Land Uses. There are other properties adjacent to this property that are zoned C-2A (Limited Central Commercial), one is vacant, the other is TD Bank, Walgreens Pharmacy, and another parcel that is zoned C-2A as well. To the north of this site is property that is zoned Institutional and Office and is the location of The Academy of Dover which is a charter school. Immediately west of the site is the Modern Maturity Center where you heard people associated with the Modern Maturity Center speaking. In terms of the Comprehensive Plan in order for this to go through, it is dependent upon that plan change. There is language in the Comprehensive Plan that addresses High Density. We have included the bulk standards for what RG-5 would include. She would state for the record that the Site Development Plan associated with DoveView has expired and those approvals were specifically for senior housing; therefore, the Site Plan will have to come back for consideration at that time. Mr. Hemmig stated for clarification if the Land Use Classification change fails to pass City Council, then this rezoning would become null and void. Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mrs. Townshend stated that City Council will be made aware that they go together and if they approve one the other will also need to be approved unless they go back and reconsider the first one. Mr. Moore stated for clarification that he is aware that there was a tax bill that was due on this parcel of land that had not been paid by the developer. The bank was advised by its legal counsel that upon the deed being recorded, they would pay the bill. That bill has now been paid. Colonel Welsh stated that to clarify a point for those who testified previously from the public, this is only a recommendation for a rezoning application. For those who had concerns regarding connectivity with the Modern Maturity Center, that would not be considered until they come forward with a Site Plan for the apartments. Mr. Moore stated that they will reach out to the Modern Maturity Center with them separately. Now we have the chance to make that connection before we file a plan before the Commission so that we can talk to them about what we plan to do. Mr. Hemmig opened a public hearing. Mr. Leonard Iacono – Stated that he would like to make a comment about the whole aspect of this project. He challenges the bank to produce a market study that states that the need for senior housing is not required. He also suggests, as a major developer in Dover and one of the largest apartment owners here, no one has ever contacted him regarding the ability of taking the project over and developing a senior housing project. If the bank contacted someone, he has no idea who they contacted. He still does not understand the connection between the fact that the City already changed it from a condominium project to a senior housing project and is now changing it back. He just does not understand the whole flow. Responding to Mr. Iacono, Mrs. Townshend stated that it has always been senior housing. Changing it to a condominium project is a form of ownership not a unit type. Essentially, what we have seen from the beginning has always been apartments as a unit type. Initially, the intent in that they would be condominiums for sale and then it

Z-11-03 Lands of CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC (DoveView Apartments) Report to City Council– March 14, 2011 Page 7 changed to apartments; however, from a zoning standpoint there is no difference. The Zoning Ordinance, in terms of the housing style, specifically states multi-family; it does not state multi-family condominium or multi-family rental. Mr. Iacono stated that it would be his error because he was under the impression that it started off initially as a condominium project and then went back to the City to request that it be a rental property and specifically a senior housing project. Responding to Mr. Iacono, Mrs. Townshend stated that it was “senior” from the beginning and was initially intended to be condominiums. They asked if they needed approval; however, Staff stated that approval was for senior housing and not necessarily the ownership or rental aspect of it. Mr. Iacono stated that if the bank is still interested in considering a senior housing aspect; he would be interested. Mrs. Carolyn Fredericks – Stated that her concern is that she does not know what the timeframe is for the Site Plan and when it would come back; however, the condition of her receiving a Certificate of Occupancy for her building was to build that connection. She is going to be ready to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy by the first of April because their building is almost completed. She is unsure how long the process would take before they would come back with their Site Plan. Responding to Mrs. Fredericks, Mrs. Townshend stated that in terms of the Modern Maturity Center at this point, it is part of their Site Plan. They have received the request from the Modern Maturity Center to come to the Planning Commission which will happen next month with their request to remove that interconnection cross access. Colonel Welsh stated that to throw out an opinion he stated that they may want to think about this for awhile because he really thinks that it would be mutually beneficial for both of you to have that interconnectivity both for bringing new people into the Modern Maturity Center and having that use. Responding to Colonel Welsh, Mrs. Fredericks stated that they would discuss this issue next month as it is a major safety issue. Mr. Nichols questioned when DoveView was proposed to be built, wasn’t interconnectivity there at one time and they wanted to bring the road across the ditch over to that point and they abandoned the road idea; however, there would still be a small path across there to get back to the Modern Maturity Center? Responding to Mr. Nichols, Mrs. Townshend stated that there were two things. One, there was a small pedestrian golf cart type access between the two properties. There was also, at that point, even though there was not anything on the Modern Maturity side there was the requirement to provide a cross access easement on the DoveView side; however, they were not required to build it until something happened at the Modern Maturity Center. When Modern Maturity Center came through for their expansion that is currently underway, the location where the interconnection was put at DoveView was something that caused them (Modern Maturity Center) concern. It was at their request that the interconnection in terms of the location on their property was moved further to the front of the property. When DoveView comes in or the vacant parcel or anything adjacent we will have to determine how that connects with the Modern Maturity piece if it stays. Mr. Nichols further stated that this area was originally shifted he believes to the back. Responding to Mr. Nichols, Mrs. Townshend stated yes and now has been shifted to the front because of concerns of traffic going through the parking lot and the ability of going around the front of the building. Mr. Hemmig questioned that the Modern Maturity Center’s Certificate of Occupancy is tied to completion of the interconnectivity, has that been built? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mrs. Fredericks stated that they have not built it yet and our building is almost completed. When they finish with their building, they cannot obtain a Certificate of Occupancy until that interconnectivity has been completed. Mr. Hemmig further stated for clarification, this zoning is taking the property from I/O to RG-5. Under the I/O we were able to do a Conditional Use for senior housing. Under the RG-5 can it still be senior housing? Responding to Mr. Hemmig, Mrs. Townshend stated that they could voluntarily age restrict it under RG-5 or they could come back with another senior citizen PND under the RG-5. RG-5 does not preclude it from being senior housing; it just does not require it. Under the I/O, the residential uses aside from the senior citizen PND are prohibited.

Z-11-03 Lands of CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC (DoveView Apartments) Report to City Council– March 14, 2011 Page 8 Colonel Welsh moved to forward to City Council recommendation of approval of Z-11-03 DoveView Apartments located at 101-405 DoveView Drive from I/O Institutional Office subject to the Corridor Overlay Zone (COZ-1) to RG-5 General Residence Zone for mid-rise apartments and subject to the Corridor Overlay Zone (COZ-1), and for reasons stated in the Staff Report and general discussion this evening, seconded by Mr. Nichols and the motion was carried 6-1 with Mr. Friedman and Mr. Holt absent and Mr. Ambruso opposed.

City of Dover Application No.: Z-11-03 Department of Planning & Inspections R-8 R- ROS CPO 8 E T TRE IPM RA S CLA RM-1 NT E IVE Y DR COL ON B I CE R-8 NN C-2A ROS L RM-1 BO IA U LE VA R D PEW C-3 TER RG-2 RM-1 IO R-8 CO U C-2A RT R GEO CPO ING RG-2 RG-2 ASH GE W Site CARVER ROAD RGO IO E ANDREW D RIV D RG-3 TON CPO C-1A RG-2 C-1A RIVE C-2A RM-2 C-2A FOREST STREET AD SAULSBURY RO FORREST AVENUE HARTLY ROAD E BERTRAND DRIV CPO C-2A EET C-2A E GIBBS DRIV BENNINGTON STR RG-1 CPO RG-1 ET LINCOLN STRE RG-2 C-2A CPO R-8 REECE STREET RG-2 RG-1 R- SC-2 8 FARMVIEW DRIVE R-8 RG-1 RG-2 RG-1 RG-1 RG-1 E ROS HAYES DR IV IPM CPO Plan Title: DoveView Location: 101-405 Doveview Dr. Plan Type: Rezoning Legend Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.07-01-30.00 Current Zoning: IO, COZ-1 Dover Parcels Propsoed Zoning: RG-5, COZ-1 Zoning Owner: CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC Sun Trust Bank Corridor Overlay Zone Date: 1-13-11 0 300 600 « 1,200 Feet

CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 2011 APPLICATION: DOVEVIEW APARTMENTS, 101-405 DOVEVIEW DRIVE FILE #: Z-11-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Public Utilities Department CONTACT PERSON: Steve Enss - Electric Sharon Duca, P.E. - Water, Wastewater, Stormwater CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7070 T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER 1. Our office has no objection to the rezoning of tax parcels ED05-076.07-01-30.00-000. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER 1. None. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER 1. The utilities on this site have already been installed based upon the originally approved layout. As such, it is preferred that changes to the site be planned accordingly. Should this site be redeveloped, which includes modifications to the use or layout, the applicant / developer will be responsible for all costs associated with providing the appropriate service to this site based upon the use including any necessary system upgrades, extensions or relocations. The appropriateness and adequacy of water and sewer services and meters will be assessed at that time. Should the existing infrastructure no longer be required based upon the proposed use, it must be properly abandoned in accordance with all City of Dover Public Utilities Department standards and specifications. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .

CITY OF DOVER D E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE L APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D O D.A.C. MEETING DATE: February 3, 2011 T =============================================================== APPLICATION: Doveview Apartments at 101-145 Doveview Drive FILE#: Z-11-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT CONTACT PERSON: Julio F. Seneus PHONE#: 760-2145 =============================================================== THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. DelDOT has no comments for the proposed rezoning. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: • A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) will be required if the proposed development exceeds 50 VPH or 400 VPD.When the study is completed, DelDOT will review it and send recommendations for the improvements to the City. The improvements contained in the study will be implemented by the developer per DelDOT's discretion. Please, contact Mr. Troy Brestel at (302) 760-2167 or e-mail: Troy.Brestel@state.de.us to set up a scoping meeting for this project. • If the proposed amended subdivision will generate fewer than 2000 trips per day or less than 200 vehicles in any hour of the day, DelDOT will allow payment towards an Area-Wide Study Fee, in lieu of a TIS. The Area-Wide Study Fee, calculated as $10 per daily trip, would be payable to DelDOT prior to the re-issuance of a Letter of No Objection. Payment of it would exempt the developer from the need to do a TIS, but would not exempt them from participation in off-site improvements or the need to do a Traffic Operational Analysis if one is required in the re-review of their entrance plans. If the developers would like to pay the fee in lieu of doing a TIS, the developer should contact me at (302) 760-2145. If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person and the planning department as soon as possible.

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2011-05 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE 2 CITY OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED 3 AT 101-405 DOVEVIEW DRIVE 4 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within 5 the limits of the City of Dover; and 6 WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of zoning and planning to change the permitted use of 7 property described below from IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and subject to COZ-1 (Corridor 8 Overlay Zone) to RG-5 (General Residence Zone for Mid-Rise Apartments) and subject to COZ-1 9 (Corridor Overlay Zone). 10 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 11 DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 12 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map and Zoning 13 Ordinance of the City of Dover have been amended by changing the zoning designation from 14 IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and subject to COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) to RG-5 15 (General Residence Zone for Mid-Rise Apartments) and subject to COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay 16 Zone) on that property located at 101-405 Doveview Drive (on the north side of Forrest 17 Avenue (Route 8) just west of the Saulsbury Road intersection), consisting of 6.735+/- acres, 18 owned by CRM Mid-Atlantic, LLC and SunTrust Bank. 19 (Tax Parcel: ED05-076.07-01-30.00-000; Planning Reference: Z-11-03) 20 ADOPTED: * 21 S:\PACKETS\2011\Council\03-14-2011\5. Ordinance 2011-05-Rezoning-101-405 Doveview Drive- Final Rdg.wpd 22 Actions History 23 March 14, 2011 - Proposed Public Hearing/Final Reading - Council 24 February 22, 2011 - Review - Planning Commission 25 January 24, 2011 - First Reading - Council 26

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE The Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Meeting was held on February 23, 2011 at 5:00 p.m. with Chairwoman Williams presiding. Members present were Mrs. Russell (arrived at 5:07 p.m.) , Mr. Bonar, Mr. Davis, and Mr. Harmon (arrived at 5:24 p.m.) . Mr. Ruane was also present. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Davis moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Bonar and unanimously carried. Request for Waiver of Land Subdivision Regulations - Reduction of Street Right-of-Way Width - Dover High School Project (South Side of Forrest Avenue) Mrs. Dawn Melson-Williams, Principal Planner, reviewed a street waiver request for the reduction of street right-of-way from sixty (60) feet to fifty (50) feet (Land Subdivision Regulations, Article VI.A.13) for construction of the new Dover High School. She advised members that the project is located on four (4) parcels of land totaling 106.5222+/- acres and is zoned R-10 (One Family Residence Zone) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). Mrs. Melson-Williams noted that the subject property is located on the south side of Forrest Avenue (DE Route 8) approximately 1,500 feet west of Mifflin Road and the owner of record is Capital School District. She noted that the Conditional Use and Site Development Master Plan are for the construction and use of a three (3) story 315,000 S.F. school with associated parking, roadways, stormwater management, landscaping, sports fields, stadium, and other site improvements. Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that the overall Site Development Master Plan for the New Dover High School includes the layout of the proposed buildings, parking lots, sports fields, and the associated transportation network to access the site and internal circulation of the site. Mrs. Melson-Williams advised members that during the applicant’s presentation to the Planning Commission at their December 20, 2010 meeting, members were provided information on ongoing discussions regarding shared infrastructure improvements between the Capital School District and the adjoining developer (Leander Lakes, LLC) for the Leander Lakes Apartments project (a development to be located to the west of the school property). Exhibits were reviewed showing proposals for the right-of-way, construction of the western entrance access road, and the connection to Tribbitt Street, which will serve both the school and the residential project. She noted that negotiations on the infrastructure are continuing. Mrs. Melson-Williams reviewed information regarding the Transportation and Circulation Network for the new Dover High School project, which is associated with consideration of the waiver request for a reduction in street right-of-way width. Mrs. Melson-Williams advised members that the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed street waiver request as part of its review of the Conditional Use/Site Development Master Plan for the new Dover High School. The Planning Commission granted conditional approval to the Conditional Use/Site Development Master Plan and to a series of waivers and considerations, including the reduction of the required street right-of-way width from sixty (60) feet to fifty (50) feet for portions of the proposed streets in the southwest area of the property, including the interconnection to Tribbitt Street. She indicated that, as part of the motion for conditional approval, the Planning Commission also adopted comments and recommendations from the Development Advisory Committee (DAC) Report. It was noted that comments and recommendations from multiple departments or agencies may be associated with the development of streets.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PAGE 2 In response to Mrs. Williams, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that the school is being designed to accommodate an overall count of 1,800 students. Referring to the proposed ingress and egress for this property, Mr. Bonar expressed his desire for a roadway width of no less than 28 feet in order for a 110 foot aerial apparatus to access the high school to protect it against fire. In addition, he strongly urged signalization at both proposed intersections at the new high school along Forrest Avenue/Route 8. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that the reduction in the street right-of-way width would not create a reduction in the paved width of the street. Several members questioned why the applicant or engineers were not in attendance to explain the need for the waiver and address concerns of members. Responding, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that the engineers were unable to attend since they were making a presentation at the Planning Commission Quarterly Workshop, which was running concurrently with the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting. Mr. Davis relayed concern with any reduction due to potential bicycle and pedestrian traffic in the area. In addition, he stated that if there is a connector road between Forrest Avenue and Hazletteville Road, Amish horses and buggies will also be using the roadway. Mrs. Melson-Williams explained that if a regional connector between Rt. 8 and Hazletteville Road is constructed in the future, the right-of-way and segment of road involved would probably be enlarged. However, she indicated that the waiver is being requested at this time due to the proposed time frame for construction of the school, which has a scheduled opening date of 2014. Mr. Gary Laing, Community Relations Officer and Public Relations Liaison for the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), reminded members that there was previous discussion regarding vehicle connectivity from the Village of Westover. Responding, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that there is a street stub from Westover to its north property line with a terminus of Worchester Drive. She indicated this is planned for a pedestrian/bicycle connection to the site but will not convey vehicular traffic. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mrs. Melson-Williams confirmed that the proposed opening for the new high school is in 2014; however, it is anticipated that the first phases of major utility work will begin during the summer of 2011. Mr. Davis moved to recommend that this request be referred back to the Planning Commission for further study and clarification of the following: actual reasons for narrowing the roadway to fifty (50) feet, a deeper look into pedestrian and bicycle traffic and ingress and egress to the school, and serious consideration of a roadway through the farmland preservation property of Papen Farms to Hazletteville Road. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bonar.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PAGE 3 In regards to the roadway through the farmland preservation property to Hazletteville Road, Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that she attended a meeting with DelDOT on February 22, 2011 and was assured that this road would not be completed in the near future. She stated that DelDOT has not added any new projects to the Capital Transportation Program due to funding issues and that DelDOT was very clear that the City should not anticipate this project coming to fruition anytime soon. In light of this information, Mrs. Williams suggested that the school district meet with DelDOT to develop a good, practical plan for an interconnection roadway to Hazletteville Road and that the motion be amended accordingly. There were no objections from the maker or seconder of the motion. The motion recommending that this request be referred back to the Planning Commission for further study and clarification of the following: actual reasons for narrowing the roadway to 50 feet, a deeper look into pedestrian and bicycle traffic and ingress and egress to the school, and serious consideration of developing a good, practical plan for a roadway to Hazletteville Road was carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Discussion - Crossover Bridge for Pedestrian at the New Dover High School At the request of Mr. Davis, members were provided detailed information regarding a 40-foot pedestrian bridge for possible construction at the new Dover High School site. Under the premise that there will be signalization at both the eastern and western ends of the new Dover High School site, Mr. Davis noted that a development is located across Route 8 and that, although an additional traffic signal could be installed at Cranberry Run, as an alternative, consideration could be given to an overhead walkway. He advised members that a similar bridge, which crossed over five (5) lanes of traffic, was built in a town in Pennsylvania approximately four (4) to five (5) years ago at a cost of $1.3M. Although he acknowledged that funding must be considered regarding this matter, he suggested that members consider the safety and traffic issues involved. In regards to the costs, Mr. Bonar advised members that the economic impact of one (1) fatal accident is approximately $900,000. It was his opinion that the construction of pedestrian overpasses should be considered for several major roadways. Mr. Gary Laing, Community Relations Officer and Public Relations Liaison for the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), noted that the example provided appears to be located in a more urban setting than the proposed new Dover High School. He advised members that a pedestrian overpass has been placed across College Avenue in Newark; however, getting individuals to use the structure has been problematic. Mr. Laing noted that a wall was constructed at the College Avenue bridge to prevent pedestrians from crossing by other means. He questioned where a crossover bridge could be located if this option was chosen for the new school. In addition, Mr. Laing advised members that the minimum clearance required for a pedestrian bridge is 17’6” in height. For each foot in height, in order to be compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), he indicated that either ramps or an elevator would be required and stated that there is no area available to accommodate the length of ramp needed.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PAGE 4 Mr. Davis noted that the crossover in Pennsylvania is located in a rural setting, not urban, with sidewalks on the north side. He stated that the pedestrian ramp curls around rather than extending in a linear fashion. Responding, Mr. Laing stated that, because of the degree of angle that would be required, regardless of the manner in which the ramp would be constructed, the area needed for the ramp would be substantial. As an alternative, he stated an elevator could be installed; however, this would create issues with maintenance, security, safety, etc. In addition, he noted that a pedestrian bridge would require maintenance to keep it free of trash, debris, and snow. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mr. Laing stated that his understanding was that “cork-screw” ramps are not ADA compliant. Mr. Davis questioned how the children who live on the north side of Forrest Avenue/Route 8 will cross the street if the overpass is not built and who would be responsible for their safety. Mr. Bonar suggested that the Capital School District be requested to make a presentation to address some of these concerns. Mrs. Townshend advised members that all of the concerns relayed by members have been discussed before the Planning Commission. She noted that the Planning Commission required that the School District connect into Tribbitt Street, at the rear of Cannon Mill, which connects to the Village of Westover, to provide relief for the approximately 900 dwelling units. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mrs. Townshend stated that the design of the street network in the Village of Cannon Mill is not conducive to cut-through traffic. Disagreeing, Mr. Bonar noted an increase in vehicular traffic in Woodcrest as a result of students attending Dover High School. After much discussion, it was the consensus of members that staff should invite the Capital School District to attend the next Committee meeting to discuss these issues further. Briefing on Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) Projects - Gary Laing Mr. Gary Laing, Community Relations Officer and Public Relations Liaison for the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), provided a briefing on DelDOT projects, as follows: West Dover Connector Mr. Laing reminded members that DelDOT held a workshop regarding the West Dover Connector in September 2010, at which time DelDOT presented the preferred alternative for the location of the connector. He noted that the workshop was well attended. Mr. Laing stated that Phase 1 of the archeology research, which consists of researching historic properties in the area of the connector, will begin soon and that Phase 2 field work should follow in the Spring of 2011. He stated that DelDOT is working on preparing environmental assessments, as directed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHA) and the assessment will be reviewed by the State Historic Preservation Office, and FHA. He indicated that survey plans are being compiled and preliminary plans should be

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PAGE 5 completed later in the year, semi-final construction and right-of-way plans are targeted to be completed in approximately one (1) year, and the final right-of-way will be determined in July 2012, followed by the real estate acquisition process. As reflected in the Community Transportation Plan, Mr. Laing stated that construction is scheduled for 2014 through 2016. Responding to Mr. Mark Brata, representing Eden Hill Commercial, Mr. Laing stated that no specific date or further details were provided by the project manager regarding preliminary plans for the project. South Governors Avenue Improvements Mr. Laing reported that the South Governors Avenue Improvements have been substantially completed, with the exception of some “punch list” items to be completed or repaired by the contractor. He anticipated that these items will be addressed once the weather permits. Water Street Railroad Crossover Mr. Laing advised members that there is no new information to report on the Water Street Railroad Crossover, explaining that this is a long-term project with a substantial amount of preliminary work required. Wyoming Mill Road Project Mr. Laing advised members that a construction contract was awarded to Diamond Materials, LLC for the Wyoming Mill Road Project. He stated that advanced utility work is underway and construction is scheduled to begin in the Spring of 2011, with a completion date anticipated in the fall. Transit Center Mr. Laing stated that a meeting was held with potential bidders for construction of the Transit Center. Certain submissions must be reviewed by DelDOT and, once completed, DelDOT will announce the awarding of the contract and work will begin on Phase 2 of the project. Briefing on Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Projects - Juanita Wieczoreck Ms. Juanita Wieczoreck, Executive Director of the Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), stated that the most significant project for the MPO is the Dover Transit Center Neighborhood Plan. She stated that MPO has been making presentations in an effort to obtain support from various organizations. It was noted that a presentation of the Dover Transit Center Neighborhood Plan and Design Book was provided to City Council during their Regular Meeting of February 14, 2011. Referring to the executive summary of the Dover Transit Center Neighborhood Plan and Design Book, Ms. Wieczoreck noted that the purpose of the Plan and Design guidelines is to provide the City of Dover with a design and planning strategy to guide development around the new Transit Center site and provide a very specific understanding of what the City could realize for this area.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 23, 2011 PAGE 6 Ms. Wieczoreck stated that the MPO is beginning to develop their annual work program and requested ideas from the City. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Ms. Wieczoreck stated that the MPO has been working on a regional bike plan and anticipates a presentation to the Committee once it has been finalized. She indicated that Mr. Michael Albert, Planner II, represents the City of Dover on this committee. Mr. Ruane requested that Mr. Albert make a presentation to the Committee regarding the proposed Bike Plan to obtain recommendations from members. Proposed Ordinance #2011-06 Amending Chapter 46 - Fire Prevention and Protection - Open Burning Mr. David Truax, Fire Marshal, reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2011-06, and advised members that the Ordinance would enhance the safety of commercial and recreational barbecuing and control and maintain the proper use of open burning. He explained that the proposed amendment would expand the present open burning ordinance to better define open burning and barbecuing; more clearly define where and how open burning and barbecuing are permitted; and better address the use of outdoor portable fireplaces. Mr. Truax stated that the draft ordinance depicts additions in blue text and deletions in red strike-outs and advised members that the proposed ordinance has been reviewed by the Deputy City Solicitor. Mrs. Williams read into the record a statement in support of the ordinance provided by Ms. Rita Kropiewnicki (Attachment #1). Mr. Bonar stated his experience with Wesley College students who have had open pit fires burn late into the evening and early morning. Mr. Bonar moved to recommend adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2011-06 (Attachment #2), seconded by Mr. Davis and unanimously carried. Mr. Bonar moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Harmon and unanimously carried. Meeting Adjourned at 6:38 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Beverly C. Williams Chairwoman BCW/JS/jg/ac/dd/tm S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Minutes\2011\02-23-2011 SA&T.wpd Attachment Attachment #1 - Statement by Ms. Rita Kropiewnicki Attachment #2 - Ordinance #2011-06 - Chapter 46 - Fire Prevention and Protection - Open Burning

ATTACHMENT #1 SA&T Committee Meeting of 02/23/2011 Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Meeting February 23, 2011 Request to Enter Statement Into the Record: On February 23, 2011, the Clerk’s Office received a call from Ms. Rita Kropiewnicki, 155 Blue Beach Drive, who stated she was unable to attend the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting but requested that it be entered into the record that she favors Proposed Ordinance #2011-06. Ms. Kropiewnicki explained that, during the Summer of 2010, her home became filled with the odor of smoke, which she discovered was emanating from a large, open pit fire at a nearby residence. She noted that her doors and windows were closed and her air conditioning was running at the time. She was particularly concerned because her granddaughter, who has breathing problems, was visiting. Ms. Kropiewnicki stated that the fire burned for many hours, and at 12:00 a.m. she summoned the police, who came to her residence. However, they informed her that there was nothing that could be done because the City had no ordinance to regulate hours when open burning would be permitted. She stated that the fire continued to burn until approximately 3:00 a.m. Ms. Kropiewnicki voiced her concerns regarding this incident to Councilman Ruane, who stated he would inquire further into this matter. She expressed her gratitude to Mr. Ruane for initiating this Code amendment and reiterated that she strongly favors Ordinance #2011-06 because she feels unregulated open burning presents a hazard to City residents.

ATTACHMENT #2 SA&T Committee Meeting of 02/23/2011 CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2011-06 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN 2 COUNCIL MET: 3 That Chapter 46 - Fire Prevention and Protection, Article I - In General, Section 46-5 - Open 4 Burning, be amended by inserting the text indicated in bold, blue, italics and deleting the text 5 indicated in red strikeout as follows: 6 Sec. 46-5. Open burning. 7 In residential multiple occupancy structures containing three or more dwelling units, 8 including but not limited to apartment houses, dormitories, roominghouses, and condominium 9 buildings, the open burning of any type shall be prohibited, except when permitted by the fire 10 marshal. The use of charcoal or gas-fired grills, burners, or cookers shall be prohibited on 11 balconies or within ten feet of the multiple occupancy structure. 12 (a) Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, 13 shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly 14 indicates a different meaning: 15 Barbecuing - Commercial. The preparation and cooking of food by way of gas 16 grill, charcoal grill, or other apparatus used for the cooking of food by way of 17 flame produced through wood, charcoal, or gas for the purpose of cooking food 18 for the sale to and/or consumption by the general public. 19 Barbecuing - Recreational. The preparation and cooking of food by way of gas 20 grill, charcoal grill, or other apparatus used for the cooking of food by way of 21 flame produced through wood, charcoal, or gas for the purpose of cooking food 22 for the consumption by a family and/or guests or by the membership of a private 23 organization or church congregation. 24 Open Burning. The burning of materials wherein products of combustion are 25 emitted directly into the ambient air without passing through a stack or chimney 26 from an enclosed chamber. 27 Outdoor Fireplace. Any homemade or commercially produced fireplace, fire pit, 28 or fire ring used for the kindling of wood. 29 (b) Permit required. Open burning of structures, brush, or bonfires shall not be 30 permitted without a permit obtained from the Fire Marshal.

Proposed Ordinance #2011-06 - Ch 46, Art I, Sec 46-5 - Open Burning Page 2 31 (c) Fire dimensions. Open burning, when permitted, shall be kindled in such a 32 manner as not to be a danger to other campers, recreational vehicles, tents, or structures 33 and shall not be of a size greater than 18 inches by 18 inches by 18 inches. Height of the 34 fire shall be measured from the ground or from the bottom of the inside of the container 35 being used to kindle the fire. Open burning shall not be kindled directly on the ground 36 unless contained in a fire ring. 37 (d) Fire clearances and time restrictions. Outdoor fireplaces shall have 36 inches 38 clearance from all combustibles when in use. Portable fire places, fire pits, or fire 39 rings shall be extinguished in a residential area between the hours of 12:00 40 midnight and 8:00 a.m. 41 (e) Commercial barbecuing. Commercial barbecuing shall be permitted under the 42 following conditions: 43 (1) The location has been approved by City of Dover Licensing and Inspections 44 and the Fire Marshal and an Outdoor Public Gathering Permit has been obtained. 45 (2) One (1) fire extinguisher of not less than five (5) lbs. (pounds) ABC is to 46 be located within ten (10) feet of the cooking area. Cooking area and cooking 47 fuels shall be secured from public access. 48 49 (3) Approval from the Board of Public Health has been obtained. 50 (4) The operator shall make all reasonable attempts to avoid causing a 51 nuisance to nearby property owners with smoke, fumes, or sparks. 52 (5) All compressed flammable gas containers used for cooking shall be secured 53 in such a way as to prevent them from being knocked, tipped, or blown over. 54 Any commercial barbecuing operations which are a continual nuisance because 55 of smoke, fumes, or sparks shall be terminated by the Code Official or Fire Marshal and 56 the Outdoor Public Gathering Permit revoked until such time as the Director of Licensing 57 and Inspections is satisfied that the problem has been corrected. 58 Barbecuing of any kind shall not be kindled within 200 feet of any fuel pump or 59 storage tank fill. Cooking grease shall not be disposed of by placing it directly on the 60 ground or in storm water drains. 61 (f) Prohibited - Multi-family residential dwelling units. In apartment buildings, 62 condominiums, or any other multi-family residential dwelling of three (3) or more units 63 by any other name, the storage of propane tanks inside units or on balconies is prohibited. 64 Recreational barbecuing shall be prohibited on any balcony or under any overhanging 65 portion or within 15 feet of any structure, except that the use of electrical ranges or 66 electrical grills shall be permitted. The use of outdoor fireplaces on balconies is 67 prohibited.

Proposed Ordinance #2011-06 - Ch 46, Art I, Sec 46-5 - Open Burning Page 3 68 (g) Fines. Any owner, occupant, contractor, or body corporate found to be in violation 69 of this section shall be issued a summons as provided for in Appendix F--Fees and Fines. 70 (h) Authority of the Fire Marshal. The Fire Marshal is authorized to impose a ban 71 on open burning if weather conditions do not safely permit open burning. The Fire 72 Marshal or Fire Officer shall order any fire extinguished that is deemed unsafe or not in 73 compliance with Section 46-5 of the Dover Code. 74 ADOPTED: * 75 SYNOPSIS 76 To enhance the safety of commercial and recreational barbecuing and to 77 control and maintain the proper use of open burning. 78 Actions History 79 March 14, 2011 - Scheduled for First Reading 80 February 23, 2011 - Scheduled for Consideration by the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee 81 S:\ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS\Committee Attachments\2011\02-23-2011 SA&T\Ordinance 2011-06 - Ch 46, Art I, Sec 46-5 - Open Burning - Attach 2.wpd

UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee Meeting was held on February 28, 2011 at 5:01 p.m. with Chairman Ruane presiding. Members present were Mr. Bonar, Mr. McGiffin, and Major Kosior. Mr. Snaman was absent. Council President Hogan and Mayor Carey (departed at 5:28 p.m. and returned at 5:41 p.m.) were also present. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS By unanimous consent, the agenda was approved, as presented. Yard Waste Collection Program Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that staff developed the following goals in formulating a Yard Waste Collection Program: 1) compliance with the Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) ban on yard waste; 2) avoid an increase in costs to the customers; and 3) the development of public education to lessen or eliminate yard waste. Mr. Scott Koenig, Public Services Manager/Director of Public Works, reviewed the Yard Waste Separation Plan. He reminded members that on January 1, 2011, DSWA implemented a ban on yard waste at the Sandtown landfill and that, beginning July 1, 2011, the DSWA will start enforcing this ban. He noted that the ban was a condition of approval from the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) to continue to operate the landfill and that all waste haulers will be required to separate yard waste from the municipal solid waste stream. In reviewing the New Rules, Mr. Koenig referred to Page 2 of the Yard Waste Separation Plan and advised members that a revision was made to the second sentence in Item #2, which should read “No metal containers will be allowed.” He explained that metal containers can be easily damaged. In addition, he stated that members of Council may receive complaints from residents regarding Item #5, which modifies the current collection schedule for bulk items. Noting that bulk trash will be picked up every other week, Mr. McGiffin questioned if residents will be permitted to place large items, such as refrigerators, out for pick-up for an extended period of time. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that this could create potential concerns for property maintenance staff. Mr. DePrima noted that, although the current bulk pick-up schedule provides for a weekly pick-up, residents are not permitted to place bulk items out until the day of the scheduled pick-up. However, he noted that many residents do not adhere to this requirement. In response to Mr. Ruane, Mr. Koenig indicated that education sessions will be provided for the public, office and field staff, and homeowners associations. Responding to Mr. McGiffin, Mr. Koenig estimated that a stick would be considered less than 2" in diameter, limbs are from 2" to 6", branches are 6" and above. Although he supported recycling and maintaining a cleaner environment, Mr. Bonar relayed his concerns with legislators enacting laws that affect municipal-level operations without prior communication.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 2 Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. DePrima assured members that the program will be advertised locally and billing inserts will be distributed to customers to inform them of the change. Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend endorsement of the Yard Waste Separation Plan, as presented by staff, seconded by Mr. Bonar and unanimously carried. Generation Revenue Forecast Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, introduced Mr. Holt Bradshaw, Pace Global, who reviewed a Presentation of Generation Revenue Forecast. He explained that the forecast includes a “real” analysis that should be kept updated. Mr. Bradshaw advised members that there is a good deal of value in the assets and that they should be maintained and improved upon in order to keep cash flow. It is the opinion of Pace Global that there is great potential for revenue. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. Vince Scire, Plant Manager, stated that, as an example of continued maintenance, air heater work for Unit #3 was included in the CIP, which is necessary if Unit #3 is expected to run for 15-20 years. With regards to unanticipated expenses, he stated that approximately six (6) projects have been added to the plan as a result of the Pace life extension analysis. Mr. Bradshaw stated that a $100,000 capital contingency charge for each unit was built in to allow for capital “surprises.” With regards to materials and equipment used in the plants, Mr. Scire stated that replacement parts are sometimes extremely expensive; therefore, it can be beneficial to re-evaluate the situation and consider redesign. In response to Mr. Bonar, Mr. DePrima reminded members that a plant evaluation was conducted a few years ago and that the analysis constitutes another evaluation. He noted that, in previous evaluations, it was assumed that the plants had a five (5) year life expectancy; however, in the new evaluations a 15-year life span is expected. In regards to the $100,000 contingency charge, he noted that the City has nearly $10M in its depreciation fund, which could be a resource for repairs if necessary. He assured members that thresholds are established to determine if repairs should be made or the equipment should be abandoned. Mr. Ruane noted that the 2030 Energy Committee continues to discuss opportunities to attract alternative energy suppliers, such as encouraging a combined-cycle gas power plant at the Garrison Tract and buying purchased power energy agreements from this source. He questioned how this would correlate to the maintenance and continuation of the physical plant if energy needs can be addressed through such purchased power agreements and whether this possibility was factored into the analysis. Responding, Mr. Holt stated that the capacity market has been willing to pay for units that are capable, available, reliable, and able to run when prices are very high or when there are reliability issues on the grid. He noted that, to date, the market has been willing to pay for this from the City and other suppliers.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 3 Mr. Bonar questioned if theCity would be at a financial disadvantage if a new combined cycle unit or more modern unit becomes available and can be more readily put on line. Responding, Mr. DePrima stated that going forward with a plant at the Garrison Tract is not mutually exclusive of the idea of keeping the existing power plant running. Mr. Bonar suggested that thought be given to placing a combined cycle unit at the Garrison Tract before a competitor moves forward with such a concept. Responding, Mr. DePrima stated that, based on the Committee’s recommendation, the City contracted with Macquarie Energy, LLC for two (2) years and that they are performing due diligence on making applications to PJM and other regulatory bodies to move forward on that plant. Mr. Francis Hodsell, Pace Global, advised members that the capacity market is a three (3) year forward market. He noted that it is the opinion of Pace that the City’s assets are valuable within the structure of the capacity market and it is clear that this structure will be in place for a long period of time. Mr. Hodsell noted that if additional capacity enters the market, such as the Macquarie West Deptford Plant, this would not be seen as a risk to these assets and they could continue to generate significant cash flow for the City. Mr. Ruane stated he anticipated that West Deptford would be brought forward to the Committee next month. Responding, Mr. Hodsell stated that he will be working with City staff on a time frame for the analysis. Due to time constraints, Mr. Ruane requested that the remainder of the agenda items: 1) Power Plant FY 2012 Capital Investment Plan (CIP) Review; 2) 2012-2016 Utility Capital Investment Plan (CIP); and 3) PACE/NAES Monthly Report (December) be deferred until the next meeting. Mr. McGiffin moved to defer the remainder of the agenda items until the next meeting, seconded by Mr. Bonar and unanimously carried. By unanimous consent, the meeting adjourned at 5:51 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Eugene B. Ruane Chairman EBR/TM/jg/js/ac/dd S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Minutes\2011\02-28-2011 UTILITY.wpd

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting was held on February 28, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. with Mr. Salters presiding in the absence of Chairman Leary. Members present were Mr. McGiffin, Dr. Jones, and Mr. Shevock. Members of Council present were Council President Hogan, Mr. Bonar, Mr. Ruane, and Mrs. Russell. Mayor Carey was also present. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. McGiffin moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. Review and Recommendation - Filling of Critical Positions During their meeting of February 23, 2009, members recommended approval of a Hiring Freeze for Fiscal Year 2008-2009, but to allow the hiring of critical positions through the review and approval of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee and City Council. It was suggested that there be a “standing” agenda item to consider the filling of critical positions and, if there were no positions to consider, the item could be removed. Mr. Salters noted that there were no critical positions to be considered; therefore, no further action was required. Latest Estimate (LE) for Fiscal Year 2011 Budget Mrs. Teresa Tieman, Senior City Administrator, advised members that the Latest Estimate was prepared prior to the February 17, 2011 meeting of the Joint Legislative, Finance, and Administration and Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee. Therefore, she felt that it would not be appropriate to include the committee recommendations regarding police staffing and programs until acted on by Council during the Regular Council Meeting on February 28, 2011. Mrs. Tieman informed members that the Joint Legislative, Finance, and Administration and Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee recommended that two additional officers be sent to the spring police academy class, and that a one-time $40,000 Police Chief’s Discretionary Fund be established, noting that these expenses can be covered by savings in this year’s budget, as reflected in the Latest Estimate. She stated that no further adjustment would be necessary in the proposed police salary budget because the police academy class has been rescheduled for mid-April. Mrs. Tieman explained that, since the cost of four officers in a mid-April class is about the same as the budget for two officers in a February class, which was originally approved by City Council, no further adjustments will be needed to the Latest Estimate. Mrs. Tieman stated that, if the City Council approves the recommendation of the Joint Legislative, Finance, and Administration and Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee during the Regular Council Meeting on February 28, 2011, the Latest Estimate will be amended before the First Reading of the budget ordinances. Mrs. Tieman reviewed a Presentation - Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Latest Estimate, February 2011 (Attachment #1) and noted that this presentation is to be viewed in conjunction with the Latest Estimate, Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Budget. Mrs. Tieman reminded members that the latest estimate factors in known changes since the budget was approved.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 2 Referring to Page 5 of the Presentation, Mrs. Tieman informed members that the Transfer Tax revenue is projected at $750,000, which increases the total to approximately $1.4M. She stated that the $750,000 is due to recent large receipts, which were identified in the December Quarterly Revenue Report, and several others received since that time. Mrs. Tieman stated that Trash Fees revenues have decreased $194,511, and explained that some of this decrease was expected because several out-of-City customers canceled trash service following the last fee increase; however, a reduction in expenses is also reflected. Responding to Mr. Salters, Mrs. Tieman explained that the Parks and Recreation Silver Lake Watershed Coordinator is employed by the State of Delaware; however, the $51,000 grant pays for the City’s portion of the expense. In response to Mr. McGiffin, Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, stated that the Tax Assessor legal expenses for tax appeals in the amount $88,000 resulted from having a tax attorney present during Tax Appeals and write new ordinances related to taxes, as well as costs associated with a recent law suit that has been settled. Responding to Mr. Shevock, Mrs. Tieman explained that the reduced expense for landfill fees referenced on Page 8 of the Presentation is due to less tonnage which is probably due, in part, to recycling. Mrs. Tieman clarified, in response to Mr. Shevock, that the fund balances are projected over the minimum as the result of departmental savings and enhanced revenue, particularly noting the Transfer Tax, which was approximately $750,000 more than anticipated. Referring to Page 1 of the Latest Estimate, Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Budget, Mr. Ruane questioned if it would be fiscally allowable to utilize the excess Electric Fund balance funds to provide a Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) to customers. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. DePrima indicated that staff feels comfortable, based on the Latest Estimate, that $1.4M would be available for a Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) credit, which could be layered in over a 15-month period, beginning April 1, 2011, so that it would remain in sync with the fiscal year. Mrs. Tieman reviewed Estimated Savings from Proposed PCA Calculation, as of February 28, 2010 (Attachment #2). In response to Mr. Hogan, Mrs. Tieman stated that the Proposed PCA Calculation suggests a credit in the amount of $.0043 from April 1 through June 30 and $.0015 beginning July 1 through June 30, 2012. Mr. DePrima reminded members that, ultimately, Council has the authority to provide the PCA. In response to Mr. Bonar, Mrs. Tieman stated that a First Reading would be held on March 14, 2011 and a Final Reading on March 28, 2011. She stated that the PCA would be effective with all bills billed on or after April 1, 2011.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 3 Replying to Mr. Bonar, Mrs. Tieman clarified that the estimated savings for the average residential customers would equal approximately $12.90 for three months or $4.30 per month for three months. Mr. McGiffin moved to accept the Latest Estimate (LE) for Fiscal Year 2011 Budget Report, seconded by Dr. Jones and unanimously carried. Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend instituting a Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) to use $1.4M, applied over 15 months, effective with all bills billed on or after April 1, 2011, seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. Proposed Ordinance #2011-07 Amending Chapter 46 Fire Prevention and Protection, Article III - Fire Codes, Section 46-126 - Fire Prevention Permit Mr. Scott Koenig, Public Services Manager/Director of Public Works, reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2011-07 Amending Chapter 46 Fire Prevention and Protection, Article III - Fire Codes, Section 46-126 - Fire Prevention Permit and Amendments to Appendix F - Fees and Fines. Mr. Koenig stated that the Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations require periodic inspections, testing, and maintenance of fire alarm signaling, fire suppression, and any other fire protection systems, devices, and equipment installed within the State of Delaware, in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association’s National Fire Codes and Standards. Mr. Koenig advised members that, currently, Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulation 703, Chapter 9.1.1 requires that the Annual Certificate of Inspection and the appropriate fees be forwarded to the State Fire Marshal, with the exception of systems that are located in the jurisdiction of a Jurisdictional Assistant State Fire Marshal. He explained that, in those exceptions, the fees are paid to the appropriate Jurisdictional Assistant State Fire Marshal’s office. Mr. Koenig stated that Dover, Newark, New Castle, and Wilmington are considered to have Jurisdictional Assistant State Fire Marshals; however, currently, only the City of Wilmington and the City of Newark require the fees to be paid to the municipality. The City of Dover and the City of New Castle do not require the fees. Mr. Koenig explained that, in an effort to develop new revenue streams, staff proposes the implementation of the fees identified in the Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations. He stated that Proposed Ordinance #2011-07 would allow the City to collect the fees and begin the additional monitoring associated with receiving the certificates. He informed members that, in the past, the City has received fees collected by the inspection agencies but, without the proper authority to collect these fees, has had to return them. Mr. Koenig expressed his feeling that this would not be new to the community, noting that the inspection agencies are aware that these fees are required by State regulation. Mr. Koenig stated that staff has estimated that the collection of these fees will generate approximately $50,000 per year in additional revenue. He also stated that, once the City begins receiving the certificates, staff will update the GIS systems and the monitoring systems to ensure that accurate records are kept.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 4 Mr. Koenig stated that the proposed fees support the following Critical Success Factors identified in the Strategic Initiatives Section of the Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Annual Operating Budget: Citywide Safety and Cost and Revenue Efficiency. Responding to Mr. Salters, Mr. David Truax, Fire Marshal, stated that the City does not do the annual inspection of any fixed fire protection, including sprinkler, fire alarm, hood suppression, or fire extinguisher. He explained that these inspections are performed by contractors licensed through the State Fire Marshal’s Office. The City Fire Marshal’s Office is notified of violations within the City of Dover and follows-up to ensure compliance or issues summonses as needed. In response to Dr. Jones regarding the anticipation of increases in administrative costs associated with managing the new fees, Mr. Koenig stated that during the first year or two, there will be additional responsibilities with the collection of fees and ensuring that the City has all of the certificates in place. However, once the database is established, the intent is to utilize the GIS system; therefore, only maintenance would be required from that point forward. Mr. Koenig explained that, at this time, additional staff is not being requested. Responding to Mr. Shevock, Mr. Koenig explained that the City will not be involved in any invoicing. He stated that the inspection agency will provide the City with a copy of the certificate and the insurances of inspection, as well as a check. The check will be processed and the information will either be entered into the database and the GIS system or only the database which will be imported into the GIS system. He informed members that all of the certificates will be kept on file and will be available to the Fire Marshal’s Office, and possibly the Fire Department, through the GIS system. Staff recommended adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2011-07 Amending Chapter 46 Fire Prevention and Protection, Article III - Fire Codes, Section 46-126 - Fire Prevention Permits and Amendments to Appendix F - Fees and Fines. Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2011-07 Amending Chapter 46 Fire Prevention and Protection, Article III - Fire Codes, Section 46-126 - Fire Prevention Permits and Amendments to Appendix F - Fees and Fines (Attachment #3), seconded by Dr. Jones and unanimously carried. Review of Hospitality and Civic Function Policy Mayor Carleton E. Carey advised members that there are important functions offered by the Central Delaware Chamber of Commerce and Kent County Tourism that are currently not covered under the City’s Hospitality and Civic Function Policy. He stated his feeling that these functions should be covered for Council Members to attend, and offered a list of examples, as follows: 1. The Kent County Tourism Annual Awards Dinner 2. The Central Delaware Chamber of Commerce Annual Awards Dinner 3. The Mayor’s Annual Prayer Breakfast 4. The Governor’s Annual Prayer Breakfast 5. Kent County Economic Summit

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011 PAGE 5 Mr. McGiffin requested that Mayor Carey provide members with the costs for each of the events listed. Additionally, Mr. Salters requested that Mayor Carey provide the annual cost for members to attend these events. Mr. McGiffin moved to defer the matter until the next committee meeting, seconded by Dr. Jones and unanimously carried. By unanimous consent, the meeting adjourned at 6:56 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Reuben Salters Acting Chairman RS/TM/dd/ac S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Minutes\2011\02-28-2011 LF&A.wpd Attachments Attachment #1 - Presentation - Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Latest Estimate, February 2011 Attachment #2 - Estimated Savings from Proposed PCA Calculation, as of February 28, 2010 Attachment #3 - Ordinance #2011-07 Amending Chapter 46 Fire Prevention and Protection, Article III - Fire Codes, Section 46-126 - Fire Prevention Permit and Amendments to Appendix F (Attached to Original Minutes and File Copy)

ATTACHMENT #1 ATTACHMENT #1 LF&A Committee Meeting of 02/28/2011 1 LF&A Committee Meeting of 02/28/2011 FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 LATEST ESTIMATE February 2011 Please Note: This presentation is to be viewed in conjunction with the Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Latest Estimate

Introduction 2  Latest Estimate of Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Budget  Factors in known changes since budget approved  Major changes include:  Increase to Transfer Tax  Decrease to Trash Fees Revenue  Revised Power Supply and Generation Expense and Sales  Changes in revenue per the December Revenue Report

Fund Balances 3  General Fund – expected to exceed minimum  Equal to10.3 percent of revenue  $3.7 million  $829,245 projected over minimum  Water Wastewater Fund  In aggregate projected to fall short $7,376 of minimum requirement  This is due to the deficit in KCSA of $1.8 million  Water equal to 35 percent of revenue or $1.7 million  Wastewater equal to 43 percent of revenue or $1.4 million

Fund Balances - continued 4  Electric Fund – expected to exceed minimum  Equal to 11 percent of revenue  $11.2 million  $3.2 million projected over minimum

General Fund 5  Revenue Highlights  Going up:  Fines and Police Revenue - $57,387  Grass Cutting - $11,500  Franchise Fees - $34,000  Recreation Grant -$51,000  Homeland Security Grants, FEMA - $172,061 & Security and Safety - $16,000  Transfer Tax - $750,000  Civil Traffic Penalties - $70,000

General Fund 6  Revenue Highlights  Going down:  Investment Income - $108,000  Permits and Other Licenses - $42,000  Trash Fees - $194,511  Interfund Service Fees - $48,076  Police Grants - $58,350

General Fund 7  Expenditure Highlights  Salary adjustments made to reflect actual & projected thru June expenditures  Tax Assessor legal expenses for tax appeals - $88,000  Parks & Recreation Silver Lake Watershed Coordinator - $51,000 grant expense  Life Safety, enhanced security - $16,000 grant expense  Code Enforcement increased temporary help (approved by Council) - $26,132 and increased grass cutting - $5,000

General Fund 8  Expenditure Highlights - continued  Inspections expenditures for demolitions - $65,000  Streets expenditures associated with snow removal - $39,092  Sanitation increased salary and benefits for transferring position from Grounds - $10,281 (Grounds reduced by $23,668) and reduced expense for landfill fees - $59,786  City Manager Office salary - $6,743 and legal fees - $11,200  Information Technologies adjusted upward $13,802 to reflect accounting correction  Finance reduced - $22,000 to reflect contractual and materials and supplies savings

General Fund 9  Expenditure Highlights - continued  Fleet Maintenance reduced $30,297 to reflect repair savings  Human Resources reduced $12,500 to reflect salary and consulting fee savings  Transfer to Contingency reimbursement of $172,061 for 2010 snow storms  Uncollectible reserve increased $100,000 based on auditor recommendations

Governmental Capital Projects Fund 10  Revenue Highlights  Police grants increased for FBI grant - $20,000  Expense Highlights  Reduced to reflect vehicle purchase savings:  Grounds - $17,158  Streets - $26,579  Sanitation - $33,656  Police - $12,352  Police increased $20,000 - grant to refurbish assembly room  Information Technologies reduced $5,000 - postponed server replacement  Transfer to Community Transportation - $25,000 transferred to cover paving of Susan Place  Current year balance increased $69,745

Water/Wastewater Fund 11  Revenue Highlights  Interest earnings increased - $18,285  No other revenue was adjusted  Expense Highlights  Salary adjustments made to reflect actual & projected thru June expenditures  Uncollectible reserve increased $71,000 based on auditor recommendations  Interfund Service Fees were adjusted down $140,756 to cover changes in allocation methods and adjustments to allocated divisions

Electric Revenue Fund 12  Revenue Highlights  Based on new PACE volume projections  Direct Sales to customers increased $1.3 million  Purchase Power Adjustment credit increased $25,000  Utility Tax increased $100,200  Interfund Service Receipts decreased to cover changes in allocation methods and adjustments to allocated divisions  Interest earnings increased $44,600

Electric Revenue Fund 13  Expense Highlights  Total Power Supply and Generation expenses increased $465,563  Based on new PACE volume projections  Salary adjustments made to reflect actual & projected thru June expenditures  Electric Administration, city building and HVAC maintenance, increased $54,750 for work at 5 East Reed Street  Utility tax increased $100,200 and reflects changes to sales based on PACE volume projections offset by revenue

Electric Revenue Fund 14  Expense Highlights - continued  Uncollectible reserve increased $175,000 based on auditor recommendations  Interfund Service Fees were adjusted down $33,445 due to adjustments to allocated divisions  Debt service decrease $468,810 to reflect refinancing savings  Transfer to contingency returns the $301,070 removed from the reserve for the Ward Transformer

Electric Contingency Fund 15  Transfer of $301,070 is returned from Electric Revenue Fund, funds not needed for Ward Transformer case settlement

Electric Improvement & Extension Fund 16  Revenue and expense of $91,000 is added for state reimbursement project to realign Wyoming Mill Road

Community Transportation Improvement Fund 17  Revenue and expense of $25,000 added for paving Susan Place

18 QUESTIONS /COMMENTS?

ATTACHMENT #2 LF&A Committee Meeting of 02/28/2011 Estimated Savings from Proposed PCA Calculation Refunding Additional $1.4 million over 15 months April 2010 - June 2011 as of February 28, 2010 Current PCA Proposed PCA Additional Credit April - June 2010 $ (0.00280) $ (0.00430) $ (0.00150) Using PCA of $.0043 credit Estimated Annual Estimated kWh based on Estimated Savings Annualized Monthly Average kWh average Apr - June 2010 Savings Residential 1,000 12,000 $ (12.90) $ (51.60) Small Commercial 1,190 14,280 $ (15.35) $ (61.40) Medium Commercial 4,168 50,016 $ (53.77) $ (215.07) Large Commercial 27,820 333,840 $ (358.88) $ (1,435.51) Primary 253,900 3,046,800 $ (3,275.31) $ (13,101.24) Industrial 5,628,404 67,540,848 $ (72,606.41) $ (290,425.65)

Latest Estimate Calculations for Electric Revenue As of 2/03/11 Purchase Power Forecast from PACE Document Power Supply and Generation (ReSet Budget) January 31, 2011 Budget Fiscal Year Megawatts Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Load Forecast Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 752,412 83,163 78,755 66,782 56,452 54,396 63,566 60,136 54,199 56,334 52,554 58,744 67,331 Calculation for the PCA Refunding $1.4 million over 15 months Megawatts Total current year buget 752,412 April 52,554 May 58,744 June 67,331 15 Month Total estimated Megawts 931,041 kWh 931,041,000 Dollars kWh PCA for $1.4 m $ 0.00150 Current PCA $ 0.00280 Estimated PCA APR - JUN 10 $ 0.00430 NOTES Line loss is not subtracted out of the load. Last calculated line loss available equals 5.69% Residential rate $ 0.14500 Residential rate with new PCA $ 0.14070 Based on 1000 kWh per month savings $ 1.50 Based on 1000 kWh per year savings $ 18.04

CITY OF DOVER FINANCE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT JANUARY 2011 PREPARED BY: FINANCE DEPARTMENT PLEASE NOTE – THIS REPORT PROVIDES TOP LINE INFORMATION ON THE THREE MAJOR OPERATING FUNDS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT.

Page 2 of 10 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Budget Report January 2011 S Strategic Objectives for Fiscal Year 2010 – 2011 1. Develop Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) monthly report to provide timely information on receivable collections. 2. Assist with implementation of inventory system for Electric Plant inventory. 3. Implementation and transition to an external service for time keeping and payroll. 4. Implement and transition to lockbox and remote deposit services for cash receipts. ACTIVITY LEVELS FY10 YTD FY11 YTD BANK TRENDS Number of Deposits Made 100,844,529 1,972 Total Amount of All Deposits $ 81,154,105 $ 90,472,388 PAYROLL Hours % Amount Hours % Amount Gross wages per registers 592,741 100.0% $ 12,918,528 560,429 100.0% $ 12,591,416 Wages and Hours Worked Regular 477,239 80.5% $ 10,036,310 465,559 83.1% $ 9,951,667 All over time 21,987 3.7% $ 881,044 22,049 3.9% $ 905,834 Other Paid or Unpaid Wages and Hours Vacation 37,624 6.3% $ 976,551 36,500 6.5% $ 928,775 Sick 11,962 2.0% $ 268,579 11,200 2.0% $ 257,354 Furlough 13,749 2.3% $ - 1,506 0.3% $ - Terminal Leave - Retiree Vacation/Sick Payout 13,536 2.3% $ 416,659 3,220 0.6% $ 91,298 Comp Time (Police) 3,588 0.6% $ 109,416 4,406 0.8% $ 139,481 Personal 927 0.2% $ 24,767 785 0.1% $ 22,076 Leave Without Pay 3,131 0.5% $ - 2,399 0.4% $ - Other (description below) 8,999 1.5% $ 205,201 12,807 2.3% $ 294,931 Other includes: pay adjustments, military differential pay, committee meetings, worker compensation tracking/adjustments, etc. Other Activity Number of Pay Periods 16 16 Number of Payroll Checks Issued 6,970 6,555 Number of Pension Checks Issued 1,601 1,619 Total Pension Benefits Paid - Defined Benefit Plan $ 2,519,363 $ 2,646,116 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Number of Check Vouchers 4,317 3,781 Number of EFT Vouchers 998 1,207 Vouchers Dollar Amount Disbursed $ 68,132,299 $ 58,215,528

Page 3 of 10 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2011 General Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 2,277,575 $ 2,654,528 $ 2,655,562 $ (1,034) 100.0% Revenues Court of Chancery Fees 645,000 645,000 359,200 285,800 55.7% Fines & Police Revenues 881,502 881,502 577,505 303,997 65.5% Franchise Fees 486,000 486,000 136,380 349,620 28.1% Grants 831,850 831,850 158,613 673,237 19.1% Intrafund Services 4,347,834 4,347,834 2,313,378 2,034,456 53.2% Library & Recreation Revenues 665,689 665,689 299,988 365,701 45.1% Licenses & Permits 2,457,675 2,457,675 1,951,597 506,078 79.4% Property Taxes (Includes BID Revenue) (1) 11,035,326 11,035,326 10,853,694 181,632 98.4% Sanitation Revenues 2,387,511 2,387,511 1,340,807 1,046,704 56.2% Other Miscellaneous Revenues 365,250 365,250 125,544 239,706 34.4% Transfers-In from Special Funds & Utilities Civil Traffic Penalties 930,000 930,000 540,618 389,382 58.1% Municipal Street Aid Fund 526,843 526,843 263,776 263,067 50.1% Transfer Taxes 1,000,000 650,000 1,057,692 (407,692) 162.7% Electric Fund 8,856,000 8,856,000 6,628,000 2,228,000 74.8% Total Revenues 35,416,480 35,066,480 26,606,792 8,459,688 75.9% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 37,694,055 $ 37,721,008 $ 29,262,354 $ 8,458,654 77.6% Expenditures City Clerk & Council $ 418,172 $ 418,172 $ 212,695 $ 205,477 50.9% Mayor, City Manager & Human Resources 1,008,803 1,008,803 598,028 410,775 59.3% Police & Police Extra Duty 12,907,889 12,907,889 7,277,349 5,630,540 56.4% Public Services 4,574,682 4,574,682 2,461,682 2,113,000 53.8% Central Services 2,422,663 2,422,663 1,294,182 1,128,481 53.4% Planning & Inspections 1,943,804 1,943,804 1,119,701 824,103 57.6% Finance, Info Tech & Customer Services 2,444,787 2,444,787 1,382,745 1,062,042 56.6% Library & Recreation 1,904,696 1,904,696 1,027,409 877,287 53.9% Fire Department 709,862 709,862 423,438 286,424 59.7% Assessor 197,249 197,249 106,415 90,834 53.9% Insurance 600,000 600,000 285,757 314,243 47.6% OPEB - Retiree’s Health Care Contribution 1,297,509 1,297,509 973,129 324,380 75.0% Police Pension Trust Contribution - State Grant 620,000 620,000 90,000 530,000 14.5% Appropriation to Pension Fund 1,090,000 1,090,000 841,250 248,750 77.2% Street Lights 985,000 985,000 560,902 424,098 56.9% Debt Service 331,800 331,800 330,850 950 99.7% Transfer to CDBG 6,000 6,000 - 6,000 0.0% Provision for Uncollectible 10,000 10,000 10,000 - 100.0% Transfers Out Capital Projects Fund 1,307,839 1,307,839 1,307,839 - 100.0% Total Expenditures 34,780,755 34,780,755 20,303,371 14,477,384 58.4% Budget Balance - Working Capital 2,913,300 2,940,253 - 2,940,253 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenditures $ 37,694,055 $ 37,721,008 $ 20,303,371 $ 17,417,637 53.8% Reserve Balances Contingency $ 417,971 $ 553,493 $ 537,603 (1) Property Taxes are the taxes billed and not cash received. The outstanding receivable balance as of 1/31/11 is $642,188 as compared to $ 456,779 in January 2010.

Page 4 of 10 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2011 Water/Wastewater Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Water $ 943,545 $ 1,236,193 $ 1,236,546 $ (353) 100.0% Beginning Balance - Wastewater $ 585,053 $ 902,719 $ 902,366 $ 353 100.0% Beginning Balance - Kent County Treatment $ (1,632,876) $ (1,872,081) $ (1,872,081) $ - 100.0% Revenues Water Fees 4,206,700 4,206,700 3,102,575 1,104,125 73.8% Wastewater Fees 3,308,300 3,308,300 2,221,670 1,086,630 67.2% Kent County Treatment Fees 4,275,600 2,925,600 1,849,043 1,076,557 63.2% Ground Water Adjusment Fees - 1,350,000 706,222 643,778 52.3% Water Tank Leases 71,000 71,000 48,457 22,543 68.2% Miscellaneous 300,915 300,915 190,425 110,490 63.3% Impact Fees - Water 357,000 357,000 145,717 211,283 40.8% Impact Fees - Wastewater 323,000 323,000 130,308 192,692 40.3% Total Revenues 12,842,515 12,842,515 8,394,417 4,448,098 65.4% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 12,738,237 $ 13,109,346 $ 8,661,248 $ 4,448,098 66.1% Expenses Water/Wastewater Operating Divisions Engineering & Inspection $ 642,878 $ 642,878 $ 279,735 $ 363,143 43.5% Water 412,588 412,588 214,275 198,313 51.9% Water Treatment Plant 1,499,857 1,499,857 836,025 663,832 55.7% Wastewater 969,762 969,762 498,638 471,124 51.4% Construction & Inspection 392,561 392,561 232,570 159,991 59.2% Kent County Treatment Fees 4,235,403 4,235,403 2,041,907 2,193,496 48.2% Intrafund Services 1,272,331 1,272,331 616,240 656,091 48.4% OPEB - Retiree’s Health Care Contribution 177,427 177,427 133,068 44,359 75.0% Pension Trust Contribution - Unfunded liability 372,000 372,000 279,000 93,000 75.0% Debt Service 562,601 562,601 198,554 364,047 35.3% Transfers Out Water I & E Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 - 100.0% Wastewater I & E Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 - 100.0% Capital Asset Reserve - Water 100,000 100,000 - 100,000 0.0% Capital Asset Reserve - Wastewater 100,000 100,000 - 100,000 0.0% Impact Fee Reserve - Water 110,597 110,597 - 110,597 0.0% Impact Fee Reserve - Wastewater 6,802 6,802 - 6,802 0.0% Total Expenses 11,854,807 11,854,807 6,330,012 5,524,795 53.4% Budget Balances Budget Balance - Working Capital - Water 1,348,501 1,641,149 - 1,641,149 0.0% Budget Balance - Working Capital - Wastewater 1,127,608 1,445,274 - 1,445,274 0.0% Budget Balance-Working Capital - Kent County Treatment (1,592,679) (1,831,884) - (1,831,884) 0.0% Total Budget Balances 883,430 1,254,539 - 1,254,539 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 12,738,237 $ 13,109,346 $ 6,330,012 $ 6,779,334 48.3% Reserve Balances Contingency-Water $ 126,607 $ 125,991 $ 123,921 Contingency-Wastewater $ 141,575 $ 140,887 $ 138,669 Impact Fee Reserve - Sewer NO BUDGET NO BUDGET $ 3,887,238 Impact Fee Reserve - Water NO BUDGET NO BUDGET $ 246,737 Bond Coverage Ratio (Covenant 1.20) 4.76 4.79 10.01

Page 5 of 10 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2011 Electric Revenue Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 12,086,275 $ 13,537,864 $ 13,537,864 $ - 100.0% Revenues Sales to Customers 96,595,300 96,595,300 61,555,684 35,039,616 63.7% Purchased Power Adjustment - Credit (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (1,245,017) (754,983) 62.3% Utility Tax 1,864,800 1,864,800 1,189,442 675,358 63.8% Weyandt Hall Rents 186,816 186,816 109,179 77,637 58.4% Miscellaneous Revenues 1,085,500 1,085,500 697,791 387,709 64.3% Intrafund Service Receipts Water/Wastewater 299,442 299,442 97,203 202,239 32.5% Total Revenues 98,031,858 98,031,858 62,404,282 35,627,576 63.7% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 110,118,133 $ 111,569,722 $ 75,942,146 $ 35,627,576 68.1% Expenses Power Supply & Generation Power Supply $ 48,059,699 $ 48,059,699 $ 29,261,474 $ 18,798,225 60.9% Power Supply Management/Incentive 2,280,000 2,280,000 1,383,466 896,534 60.7% Capacity Charges 11,618,223 11,618,223 7,479,979 4,138,244 64.4% PJM Charges - Load 11,850,876 11,850,876 9,594,543 2,256,333 81.0% Total Power Supply 73,808,798 73,808,798 47,719,462 26,089,336 64.7% Plant Operations 5,694,315 5,694,315 3,447,624 2,246,691 60.5% Generation Fuels 297,820 297,820 3,251,549 (2,953,729) 1091.8% Capacity Credits (11,488,785) (11,488,785) (6,953,014) (4,535,771) 60.5% PJM Credits (720,797) (720,797) (5,595,516) 4,874,719 776.3% Total Generation (6,217,447) (6,217,447) (5,849,357) (368,090) 94.1% Total Power Supply & Plant 67,591,351 67,591,351 41,870,105 25,721,246 61.9% Electric Operating Divisions: Transmission/Distribution 3,206,515 3,206,515 1,702,924 1,503,591 53.1% Electrical Engineering 1,842,903 1,842,903 695,003 1,147,900 37.7% Administration 609,169 609,169 679,596 (70,427) 111.6% Meter Reading 222,908 222,908 115,969 106,939 52.0% Systems Operations 518,053 518,053 274,676 243,377 53.0% Intrafund Services 3,374,945 3,374,945 1,794,342 1,580,603 53.2% Utility Tax 1,864,800 1,864,800 1,189,442 675,358 63.8% Interest on Deposits 54,500 54,500 15,452 39,048 28.4% OPEB - Retirees Health Care Contribution 639,110 639,110 479,337 159,773 75.0% OPEB Trust Contribution 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 - 100.0% Pension Trust Contribution - Unfunded liability 833,000 833,000 624,750 208,250 75.0% Green Energy Payment to DEMEC 128,600 128,600 84,680 43,920 65.8% Accounts Receivable Write-Offs 135,000 135,000 135,000 - 100.0% Inventory Write-Offs 175,000 175,000 175,000 - 100.0% Pike Engineering - - 80,332 (80,332) 0.0% Debt Service 4,058,700 4,058,700 1,353,901 2,704,799 33.4% Transfers Out: General Fund 8,856,000 8,856,000 6,628,000 2,228,000 74.8% Electric Improvement & Extension Fund 3,500,000 3,500,000 875,000 2,625,000 25.0% Depreciation Reserve 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 - 100.0% Rate Stabilization Reserve 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 - 100.0% Total Expenses 101,360,554 101,360,554 62,523,509 38,837,045 61.7% Budget Balance - Working Capital 8,757,579 10,209,168 - 10,209,168 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenses $ 110,118,133 $ 111,569,722 $ 62,523,509 $ 49,046,213 56.0% Reserve Balances Contingency Reserve $ 1,071,054 $ 1,071,054 $ 1,052,728 Insurance Reserve $ 408,503 $ 408,503 $ 401,921 Rate Stabilization Reserve $ 6,171,027 $ 6,171,027 $ 6,139,256 Bond Coverage Ratio (Covenant 1.25) 1.51 1.57 1.90 Megawatt Hours Sold & Purchased Sales to Customers MWh (excluding Street Light MWh) 707,536 707,536 453,940 Sales per MWh $ 136.524 $ 139.159 $ 135.603 Purchased/Generated MWh 738,215 738,215 467,576 All In MWh Supply & Generation $ 91.561 $ 91.561 $ 89.547

Page 6 of 10 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2011 General Capital Project Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Projects $ 65,479 $ 227,592 $ 227,592 $ - 100.0% Beginning Balance - Library $ - $ 34,583 $ 34,583 $ - 100.0% Revenues Transfer from General Fund for Projects 1,307,839 1,307,839 1,307,839 - 100.0% State Grant - Library 3,343,520 4,232,348 543,175 3,689,173 12.8% Police Grant 18,000 18,000 - 18,000 0.0% Miscellaneous Receipts - - 5,130 (5,130) 0.0% Library Bond Issue/Contributions 1,000,000 1,000,000 30,000 970,000 3.0% Transfer from Library Reserve 2,343,519 2,363,732 - 2,363,732 0.0% Transfer from Parkland Reserve - 36,872 28,629 8,243 77.6% Transfer from Capital Asset Reserve 140,000 - - - 0.0% Interest Earnings 10,900 10,900 2,444 8,456 22.4% Income from Sale of Assets - - 12,446 (12,446) 0.0% Total Revenues 8,163,778 8,969,691 1,929,663 7,040,028 21.5% Total Beginning Balance & Revenue $ 8,229,257 $ 9,231,866 $ 2,191,838 $ 7,040,028 23.7% Expenditures Fire $ 288,210 $ 223,700 $ 223,435 $ 265 99.9% Grounds Maintenance 63,675 63,675 46,067 17,608 72.3% Library 6,687,039 7,630,663 619,891 7,010,772 8.1% Recreation 45,000 81,872 38,453 43,419 47.0% Police 282,380 335,880 226,325 109,555 67.4% Streets 481,055 481,055 345,759 135,296 71.9% Sanitation 246,075 246,075 212,369 33,706 86.3% Information Technology 12,000 12,000 6,680 5,320 55.7% Mayor 31,500 31,500 - 31,500 0.0% Total Expenditures 8,136,934 9,106,420 1,718,979 7,387,441 18.9% Budget Balance - Projects 92,323 125,446 - 125,446 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenditures $ 8,229,257 $ 9,231,866 $ 1,718,979 $ 7,512,887 18.6% Reserve Balances Capital Asset Replacement Reserve $ 116,465 $ 256,645 $ 252,532 Library Reserve $ 1,243,686 $ 3,581,311 $ 3,246,934 Parkland/Recreation $ 185,045 $ 228,394 $ 195,982

Page 7 of 10 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2011 Water/Wastewater Improvement & Extension Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Water $ 743,431 $ 1,590,874 $ 1,590,874 $ - 100.0% Beginning Balance - Wastewater $ 257,168 $ (45,665) $ (45,665) $ - 100.0% Beginning Balance - Bond Proceeds - Wastewater $ 286,500 $ - $ - $ - 0.0% Revenues Bond Issue Proceeds Series 2010 3,016,200 3,016,200 - 3,016,200 0.0% Income from Sale of Assets - - 17 (17) 0.0% Interest Earned - - 21,342 (21,342) 0.0% State Loan-Water - 2,404,017 65,770 2,338,247 2.7% State Loan-Wastewater - 5,597,956 2,042,107 3,555,849 36.5% Transfer from Water Operating Fund for Water 500,000 500,000 500,000 - 100.0% Department of Energy Grant - 45,248 - 45,248 0.0% Transfer from Wastewater Operating Fund for Wastewater 500,000 500,000 500,000 - 100.0% Transfer from Impact Fee Reserve - Wastewater 242,040 758,821 - 758,821 0.0% Total Revenues 4,258,240 12,822,242 3,129,236 9,693,006 24.4% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 5,545,339 $ 14,367,451 $ 4,674,445 $ 9,693,006 32.5% Expenses Water $ 620,000 $ 3,605,055 $ 437,598 $ 3,167,457 12.1% Wastewater 1,560,700 7,075,994 2,064,492 5,011,502 29.2% Total Expenses 2,180,700 10,681,049 2,502,090 8,178,959 23.4% Budget Bal-Working Capital - Wastewater Bond Proceeds 2,153,140 2,153,140 - 2,153,140 0.0% Budget Balance - Working Capital - Water 623,431 889,836 - 889,836 0.0% Budget Balance - Working Capital - Wastewater 588,068 643,426 - 643,426 0.0% Total Budget Balances 3,364,639 3,686,402 - 3,686,402 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 5,545,339 $ 14,367,451 $ 2,502,090 $ 11,865,361 17.4% Reserve Balances Capital Asset Replacement - Water $ 319,003 $ 318,113 $ 314,588 Capital Asset Replacement - Wastewater $ 168,767 $ 168,476 $ 167,377

Page 8 of 10 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2011 Electric Improvement & Extension Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 1,688,861 $ 3,429,624 $ 3,429,624 $ - 100.0% Beginning Balance Bond $ - $ 415,585 $ 415,585 $ - 100.0% Revenues Interest Earnings 40,700 40,700 9,495 31,205 23.3% Transfer from Electric Revenue Fund 3,500,000 3,500,000 875,000 2,625,000 25.0% Insurance Claim Proceeds - 280,000 265,643 14,357 94.9% Department of Energy Grant - 135,152 137,117 (1,965) 101.5% Income from Sale of Assets - - 3,785 (3,785) 0.0% State Reimbursement for Governor's Ave - 254,757 - 254,757 0.0% Total Revenues 3,540,700 4,210,609 1,291,040 2,919,569 30.7% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 5,229,561 $ 8,055,818 $ 5,136,249 $ 2,919,569 63.8% Expenses Power Plant $ 1,480,068 $ 2,156,740 $ 1,479,498 $ 677,242 68.6% Transmission/Distribution 739,000 739,000 296,631 442,369 40.1% Electrical Engineering 1,390,429 1,598,982 831,664 767,318 52.0% Transfer to Depreciation Reserve - 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 100.0% Total Expenses 3,609,497 5,494,722 3,607,793 1,886,929 65.7% Budget Balance - Working Capital 1,620,064 2,561,096 - 2,561,096 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenses $ 5,229,561 $ 8,055,818 $ 3,607,793 $ 4,448,025 44.8% Reserve Balances Depreciation Reserve $ 9,572,390 $ 10,513,555 $ 10,380,159 Future Capacity Reserve $ 9,294,563 $ 9,294,627 $ 9,146,594

Page 9 of 10 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2011 Community Transportation Improvement Fund Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance $ 100,913 $ 100,913 $ 309,851 $ (208,938) 307.0% Revenues Grants Revenue 1,000,000 1,000,000 207,496 792,504 20.7% Transfer from General Fund 300,000 300,000 300,000 - 100.0% Interest Earned 2,800 2,800 238 2,562 8.5% Total Revenues 1,302,800 1,302,800 507,734 795,066 39.0% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 1,403,713 $ 1,403,713 $ 817,585 $ 586,128 58.2% Expenses Program Expenses - Grant related $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 481,116 $ 518,884 48.1% Program Expenses - City appropriated 300,000 300,000 175,926 124,074 58.6% Total Expenses 1,300,000 1,300,000 657,042 642,958 50.5% Budget Balance - Working Capital 103,713 103,713 - 103,713 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 1,403,713 $ 1,403,713 $ 657,042 $ 746,671 46.8%

Page 10 of 10 CITY OF DOVER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN UNRESERVED FUND PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2010 CDBG/NSP GIRLS CIRCLE & SUBSTANCE POLICE LIBRARY HOUSING GAMES GRANT ABUSE PREV. GRANTS GRANTS GRANTS OF DOVER GRANT TOTALS REVENUES: State Grants received $ 67,939 $ - $ - $ - $ 29,048 $ 96,987 Federal Grants received 123,557 124,498 666,454 8,551 - 923,060 Recreation revenue - - - - 4,785 4,785 Miscellaneous revenue (5,130) - - - - (5,130) Investment income (loss) 349 - - - - 349 TOTAL REVENUES $ 186,715 $ 124,498 $ 666,454 $ 8,551 $ 33,833 $ 1,020,051 EXPENDITURES: Program expenditures $ 100,685 $ 85,983 $ 379,324 $ 8,551 $ 85,263 $ 659,806 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 100,685 $ 85,983 $ 379,324 $ 8,551 $ 85,263 $ 659,806 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures $ 86,030 $ 38,515 $ 287,130 $ - $ (51,430) $ 360,245 Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers-out (40,680) - (136,557) - - (177,237) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures & other uses $ 45,350 $ 38,515 $ 150,573 $ - $ (51,430) $ 183,008 UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF YEAR $ 315,736 $ 35,505 $ 61,672 $ - $ 10,710 $ 423,623 UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE AT END OF YEAR $ 361,086 $ 74,020 $ 212,245 $ - $ (40,720) $ 606,631 Notes: Substance Abuse Prevention Grant: Negative Fund Balance is due to timing, the revenues are on a reimbursement basis.

Dover Police Department Monthly Report To Mayor & City Council “To Protect and Serve” January 2011

February 11, 2011 Honorable Carleton E. Carey, Sr., Mayor Members of Dover City Council City Hall Dover, DE 19901 Mayor Carey and Council Members: The following is the report on Police Department activities for the month of January 2011: COMPLAINTS Total complaints received through January 31st 3,000 numbered 2,470. This is an increase of 88 2,470 2,396 2,346 2,382 complaints over the same time period for last year. 2,400 2,071 1,800 1,200 600 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS 25 19 18 20 Cases Reported in January 15 Cases Cleared in 10 January 7 7 4 Cases Cleared from 5 Previous Months 1 0 0 0 0 Burglary Robbery Rape

Report to Mayor and Council January 2011 Page 2 QUALITY OF LIFE TASK SECTION ENFORCEMENT ACTION ARRESTS ABANDONED VEHICLES 0 ALCOHOL VIOLATIONS/DUI’S 6 ASSIST OTHER 0 WARRANTS ON FILE 1 BIKE ON SIDEWALK 0 CITY PARK VIOLATIONS 0 CRIMINAL ARRESTS 76 DRUG RELATED ARRESTS 11 LOUD MUSIC 2 MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS 2 PARKING VIOLATIONS 8 PEDDLER 0 MEETINGS 36 PROSTITUTION 0 COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT DCO’S 0 WANTED CHECKS/CPC’S 17 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 61 WARNINGS 37 FUGITIVE 13 TOTAL ARRESTS 270 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 2,400 1,953 1,948 The department issued 1,672 traffic citations through this 1,489 1,672 reporting period. This is a decrease of 276 citations over the 1,600 1,292 number issued during the same period last year. 800 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TRAFFIC CRASHES Through January 31st, Dover Police investigated 138 traffic crashes. This is an increase of 4 accidents investigated during the same period last year. 200 180 145 151 134 138 100 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Report to Mayor and Council January 2011 Page 3 911 CENTER 0% 0% 0% During the month of January*, our 911 Center handled a total of 7,715 calls averaging 249 calls per 911 Landline day. Dispatchers handled 1,623 calls on the 911 911 Wireless wireless lines, an average of 53 calls per day and 694 calls on the 911 landlines, an average of 23 calls per Administrative day. CITY ORDINANCE SUMMONS 1,000 919 840 788 800 722 Through January 31st, we issued 722 city ordinance 551 629 493 summons, a decrease of 66 summons over January of last 600 451 year. *Note: of those summonses issued in January, 37 457 419 were issued for handicapped parking violations, 22 for fire 400 lane parking violations, 25 for false alarms (16 for 3-5 alarms, 13 for 6-9 alarms, 4 for 10-15 alarms, and 5 for 16 200 or more alarms) and 9 for noise violations (6 for vehicle 0 violations and 3 for residence violations). 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 ISSUED PAID Listed below are the major crimes and activities that occurred during the month of January: • On Tuesday January 4, 2011, a subject attempted to snatch a victim’s purse off of her shoulder as she was getting into her vehicle. She was able to get into her car but was struck several times by the subject before managing to get away and notify police. A short time later, the subject was observed and fled on foot from officers but was apprehended. • On January 5, 2011, a 49 year old male victim reported that he was robbed at knifepoint in his bedroom by two subjects, who then fled in a vehicle operated by a third subject. Dover Officers observed this vehicle and all three were apprehended. One of the subjects was found to be in possession of a folding knife and the victim's money. They were also found to be in possession of 28.6 grams of marijuana and drug paraphernalia. • On Saturday, January 8, 2011, three unidentified black males, two of whom were wearing stockings over their heads, were hiding at the rear of the China King restaurant when an employee exited the business. The subjects then assaulted the employee and forced their way into the business. One of the subjects was armed with a knife and demanded money. All three subjects fled after receiving US Currency from the cash register. • Detectives are currently investigating a burglary at a business located in the Hamlet Shopping Center. The burglary occurred on Monday, January 10, 2011. The subject entered the business after breaking the front window with a liquor bottle. Once inside the subject removed misc cigarettes, cigars and an electronic device. A witness reported the crime after seeing a young black male subject exiting the business and fleeing on a bicycle. There was a second black male on a bicycle in the area who was a possible lookout. • On Friday January 14, 2011, two subjects entered the victim’s residence via an unsecured front door. The subjects were armed with a black pellet hand gun, a Maglite flashlight, and both subjects were wearing ski masks. Once inside the residence both subjects entered the victim’s bedroom where the victim was struck in the head multiple times with the flashlight causing several severe lacerations to the victim’s scalp and forehead. The defendants then removed an undisclosed amount of United States Currency and a safe box containing various prescription medications. The victim was able to flee the bedroom and call 911 as the subjects exited the residence by breaking out a bedroom window.

Report to Mayor and Council January 2011 Page 4 Major crimes and activities that occurred during the month of January continued: • On Sunday January 16, 2011, four unknown black male subjects entered a local restaurant through the rear entrance/exit as employees were attempting to close. All of the subjects were wearing various disguises and dark clothing. One of the subjects was armed with a handgun; a second subject was armed with a knife. The subjects then made the employees lie on the floor as they forced entry into the office of the business where they removed an undisclosed amount of United States Currency. • On January 19, 2010, a victim was approached by three black males while standing outside of his room at a local hotel. One of the subjects produced a handgun and demanded money. All three fled on foot after obtaining victim’s wallet and Nextel Flip phone. • On January 19, 2011, Detectives arrested a subject and charged him with 8 counts of Rape in the 4th Degree and other charges after investigation revealed that he had an ongoing relationship with a 16 year old female Dover High School student. The subject was an instructor of string instruments at both Dover High School and William Henry Middle School. • On January 22, 2011, Detectives investigated a burglary at a residence on Gordon Place. The owner had been away for a several days during which the residence was burglarized. The resident returned home to find damage to a door where someone entered and while inside removed valuables. • On January 22, 2011 the Dover Officers arrested two subjects after conducting a traffic stop on North DuPont Highway. Officers located a loaded Taurus 9 mm handgun, 4 hydromorophone pills, and 2.1 grams of marijuana. The handgun was determined to be stolen. • On January 25, 2010, Dover Officers responded to Carolyn Court in Persimmon Park Place for a report of shots fired. Upon the officers arrival all parties involved had left the scene. A short time later, a 19 year old Dover man responded to the BayHealth Emergency Room with a gunshot wound to his upper back. The victim refused to cooperate with investigators and was treated and released from the hospital. • On January 28, 2011, Detectives began investigating a complaint of child abuse that occurred at a residence on Walker Road. Investigation revealed that a child was sexually assaulted by a subject. These assaults occurred between August 2009 and August 2010. The subject fled to Philadelphia, PA but turned himself in to the Philadelphia Police Department the day after he fled. • On January 28, 2011, Detectives investigated a burglary to a residence in the 800 block of Sunset Terrace. The unknown subject entered the residence by breaking a rear sliding glass door. Once inside the subject removed miscellaneous jewelry and prescription medication. Respectfully Submitted, James E. Hosfelt, Jr. Chief of Police

Monthly Report January 2011 Office of City Assessor

Assessor’s Report Major Updates Nov‐10 Dec‐10 Jan‐11 Assessment Change ‐$64,300 $2,262,800 ‐$7,663,600 Residential Sales Ratio Report Sales in Study Total Assessed Value Total Sale Price Ratio PRD 6 $1,171,600 $1,015,506 1.15 1.01 1|Page

Assessor’s Report Ratio – Assessed Value divided by Sale Price. PRD – Mean – A PRD above 1.03 tends to indicate assessment regressivity – high valued properties are under appraised relative to low valued properties. A PRD below .98 tends to indicate assessment progressivity – high valued properties are relatively over appraised. Points of Interest Scanning & Filing ‐ All new deeds are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. ‐ All appeal documents and correspondence are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. Assessor’s Office Supplemental Billing ‐ Supplemental bills were mailed out totaling $5,478.78 Omitted Assessment ‐ Added an assessment value of $261,600 to the tax roll 2|Page

City of Dover Sales Ratio Report for January 2011 Total Assesesed PARID Address Val. Sales DT Price ASR ED05‐068.19‐05‐75.00 56 NICHOLAS DR 200,400 13‐Jan‐11 185,016 1.08 ED05‐085.11‐01‐51.00 138 TURNER DR 175,000 20‐Jan‐11 132,600 1.32 ED05‐076.04‐06‐36.00 413 ANN MOORE ST 151,400 17‐Jan‐11 139,990 1.08 ED05‐068.20‐01‐27.00 46 NICHOLAS DR 190,500 7‐Jan‐11 155,000 1.23 ED05‐077.06‐01‐10.00 35 PARK DR 250,400 10‐Jan‐11 225,000 1.11 ED05‐068.19‐05‐74.00 54 NICHOLAS DR 203,900 14‐Jan‐11 177,900 1.15 1,171,600 1,015,506 6.97

CITY MANAGER’S MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY 2011 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011

Customer Services 1,316 payments were processed online or by telephone in January 2011. City of Dover property taxes were due August 31, 2010. As of January 31, 2011 the delinquent property taxes total $662,706 for all tax years. Budget and Program Development Continued meetings with Customer Service staff to review implementation of the new utility bill design. Participated in several GFOA Webinars regarding new budget document requirements and performance measure‐ ment. Began meetings with departments regarding their submissions for the Fiscal 2012 draft CIP. Human Resources IBEW contract negotiations settled. Information Technology Continued working on the upgrade of the City’s website. Began recruitment efforts for LAN Analyst position. Parks, Recreation, & Library The Library recorded 469 people attending 18 children’s programs. Thirty‐one teens attended five teen programs at the Library. Eighty‐one residents were recorded in Job Resource Center. Final accounting of the new storage room at the Pitts Center has been completed. Public Services Contractor for the Library Bid Pac A has completed approximately 85% of the contract work. Began working on the Spring Street program bid documents and the Yard Waste plan. Public Utilities Water, Wastewater & Construction crews plowed snow for three days during the month of January, with the Elec‐ tric crews clearing the Administration building parking lots. Water main installation began for the new library project. Safety luncheon held, for the entire Public Utilities Department, to celebrate a safe 2010 with only 2 lost time acci‐ dents. 2 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011

PUBLIC AFFAIRS Citizen Action Center Citizen Action Center Number of Frequently Asked Questions Complaints Registered 200 500 402 379 368 378 356 400 150 332 309 312 300 263 252 249 222 100 186 200 50 100 0 0 Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Planning/Inspections Police Public Services/Public Works Public Ut ilities Site Admin/Ot her AVERAGE TIME TO CLOSE COMPLAINTS RECEIVED ‐ January 2010 Total # Department # Of Days Complaints Planning/Code Enforcement 16 10.5 days (property code violations) Police (community policing) 3 7.4 days Public Services ‐ Grounds 2 ‐ Sanitation 3.17 days 6 ‐ Streets 4 Public Utilities (electric outages) 8 0.9 days Site Admin/Other Departments 3 1.4 days COMMUNITY OUTREACH, TRAINING AND EDUCATION EVENTS ‐ January 2010  Attended Library Public Relations Committee Meeting.  th Presentation and call to service in recognition of the 50 Anniversary of JFK’s Inauguration at William Henry Middle School.  Attended Recycling Grant Workshop and aided in the writing of 4 grants for the City’s Recycling Program.  Continued working with Delaware.net on the redesign and content of the website.  Attended presentation at the Police Department for GREAT Program which may replace the current DARE program.  Participated in several meetings with the House of Pride. July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan OTHER ACTIVITIES FYTD 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 Facebook ‐ New Posts 21 26 54 41 52 59 57 310 Facebook ‐ Page Views 716 1,004 1,145 1,152 1,671 1,768 1,882 9,338 Facebook –Replies to Questions 17 37 21 23 21 27 21 167 Press Releases 16 9 16 5 2 3 4 55 Ceremonial Documents 25 16 26 19 17 16 15 134 (Proclamations, Certificates, Letters of Welcome) City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011 3

CENTRAL SERVICES Fleet Operations & Maintenance Items on Hand with no Usage over 36 Months 80000 140 $1,000,000 70000 120 Total Work Orders $800,000 60000 100 Total Dollars 50000 80 $600,000 40000 60 30000 40 $400,000 20000 20 10000 0 $200,000 Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Total Dollars Tot al Work Orders Elect ric Wat er General Work Orders: 123 Electric: $465,477.93 Fleet Maintenance: $6,000.95 (excludes Melvin’s Sunoco) Water: $ 25,393.08 Fuel: $45,091.81 General: $ 38,077.15 Stock Purchases by Fund Contingency & Warehouse Stock 500,000 $4,500,000 2,700 2,600 400,000 $4,000,000 2,500 Total Line Items 2,400 300,000 $3,500,000 2,300 Total Dollars 2,200 200,000 $3,000,000 2,100 2,000 100,000 $2,500,000 1,900 1,800 0 $2,000,000 1,700 Jan- Feb- M ar- Apr- M ay- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Elect ric Wat er General Total Dollar Value Total Line It ems Electric: $36,399.67 Total Dollar Value: $2,703,862.74 Water: $15,376.94 Total Line Items: 1,802 General: $13,573.14 Major Program Updates MEASURE JANUARY 2011 JANUARY 2010 DIFFERENCE Issue Effectiveness (>90%) How often the warehouse has what cus‐ 99.0% 99.3% ‐0.28% tomers need when it’s needed. [issues / (issues + back orders)] * 100 Turn Over Rate (4‐5 per yr.) Indicates that the material stocked is the 1 every 23.4 years 1 every 18.2 years 5.2 years material being used. Bids for non‐inventory items converted to 11 of 12 Bids 7 of 7 Bids (FY10 Total) purchase orders within timeframe ‐8.3% 91.6% 100% (Quantity and Percentage) Sealed bids prepared, received & distrib‐ 29 of 31 Bids 36 of 38 Bids (FY10 Total) uted within 7 working days of receipt ‐1.2% 93.5% FYTD 94.7% (Quantity and Percentage) Scheduled Preventative Maintenance 6 of 20 appointments kept 24 of 24 appointments kept appointments being kept. ‐70.0% 30% 100% (Quantity and Percentage) 399,185 pieces Mail receiving lowest discounted rate 198,813 pieces (FY10 Total) 0.7% (Quantity and Percentage) 96.7% 95.9% Routine work orders completed within 5 36 work orders completed 43 work orders completed 2.1% days (Quantity and Percentage) 92.3% 86% Emergency work orders completed within 4 work orders completed 1 work order completed ‐ 2 days (Quantity and Percentage) 100% 100% 4 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011

CUSTOMER SERVICES WORK ORDERS PROCESSED EXTENSIONS OF CREDIT 3,500 900 833 783 765 3,000 800 714 729 700 613 628 612 632 2,500 2,262 600 547 556 1,984 1,970 1,972 523 1,833 1,825 468 2,000 1,709 1,689 500 1,526 1,459 1,399 1,325 1,361 400 1,500 300 1,000 200 500 100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 CUSTOMER PAYMENT USAGE CUTS FOR NON PAYMENT $1,800,000 120,000 $1,600,000 97,475 96,098 100,000 $1,400,000 80,000 $1,200,000 $976,180 $1,000,000 $831,683 60,000 38,655 38,340 $800,000 40,000 19,993 17,424 $600,000 20,000 13,351 13,779 86 77 $400,000 0 $200,000 $122,959 $118,743 Drive‐Thru Over the Mail, Drop Credit Cards Bank Drafts $‐ Window Counter Box 2011 YTD 2010YTD January 2011 January 2010 FYTD11 FYTD10 FY 2011 FY 2010 Major Program Updates Jan 2011 Jan 2010 Difference Year‐to‐Date Year‐to‐Date Number of Customers Served 22,704 20,383 2,321 176,065 168,959 Final Bills 483 488 (5) 4,591 4,301 Estimated Bills 139 132 7 1,014 982 Penalties Posted $ 31,703 $ 15,024 $ 16,678 $ 161,526 $ 124,756 Extensions of Credit ‐ Amount Extended $ 219,241 $ 172,092 $ 47,149 $ 1,397,147 $ 1,143,192 Balance Transfers $ 3,273 $ 4,815 $ (1,542) $ 18,637 $ 28,653 Utility Collections $ 30,320 $ 19,980 $ 10,340 $ 184,509 $ 153,513 Special Assessments $ 515 $ 110 $ 405 $ 7,334 $ 32,556 Miscellaneous Billings $ 62,837 $ 38,783 $ 24,055 $ 867,656 $ 784,871 CNP through Disconnect Collars 2 ‐ 2 55 98 Court Cases ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Tamperings 2 2 ‐ 29 23 Taxes Levied $ 804,824 $ ‐ $ 804,824 $ 1,875,649 $ ‐ Billing Adjustments $ 8,753 $295 $ 8,458 $ (284,068) $ 130 Total Taxes Collected $ 84,277 $40,712 $ 43,564 $ 9,686,692 $ 9,316,261 Taxes Outstanding $ 711,794 $461,078 $ 250,716 $ 6,246,890 $ 459,456 Payments in Lieu $ 1,500 $1,500 $ ‐ $ 10,500 $ 10,500 Billing Accuracy (on schedule billings) 99.0% 99.9% ‐ 99.0% 99.5% Bills Published on Schedule 99.9% 99.9% ‐ 99.9% 99.9% Meters Read on Schedule 99.9% 99.9% ‐ 99.9% 99.9% Customer Satisfaction Rating 99.7% 99.8% ‐ 99.7% 99.8% Deliquent Accounts Collected 99.8% 99.7% ‐ 99.8% 99.7% City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011 5

HUMAN RESOURCES Customer Service Contacts Payroll Hours 700 9,000 600 8,000 500 7,000 400 6,000 5,000 300 4,000 200 3,000 100 2,000 0 1,000 Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 25 20 25 68 55 50 42 103 150 134 38 12 147 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Cit izens Assisted Employees Assisted 75 37 70 97 172 85 78 79 97 68 135 75 62 Overtime 3,293 1,556 1,415 1,602 1,316 1,779 1,874 1,257 1,257 1,049 593 1,505 2,200 Applicat ions Processed 0 35 0 2 0 75 4 482 259 273 3 0 235 Sick 4,832 2,173 3,320 1,969 961 732 1,749 1,466 1,393 1,300 1,451 1,896 1,946 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Category Total 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 * Caucasian 320 320 318 315 315 315 314 314 315 319 312* 311 313 N/A * Minorities 61 61 61 61 62 63 62 62 62 62 61* 61 61 N/A Hired 1 ‐ 1 ‐ 2 2 ‐ 2 1 4 1 ‐ 2 16 Terminated/Resigned/ 4 ‐ 3 4 1 1 2 2 1 ‐ 3 1 ‐ 22 Retired Promoted 1 2 1 6 3 ‐ 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 14 Jobs Posted 1 3 3 ‐ 3 ‐ 2 3 4 1 ‐ ‐ 3 23 Workers Comp. Injuries 4 2 2 3 4 8 5 6 3 5 2 5 7 56 Workers Comp. Hours 23 50 186 358 299 123 11 9 ‐ 24 65 42 360 1,542 Insurance Claims 1 10 9 6 7 10 8 2 8 3 4 8 3 79 Full‐time Employees: 358 Part‐time Employees: 16 (4 Pitts Center, 1 Recreation, 11 Library) * Total full‐time, Caucasian and Minority employees were adjusted due to an audit of employee information. Numbers do not reflect, temporary, seasonal, relief fire dispatchers, committee or council members. Hired: MEO I/Sanitation and Communications Operator/Police Jobs Posted: Groundsworker I/Public Utilities; Operations‐Construction Managers/Public Utilities; LAN Analyst/Information Technology Unfilled/Open Positions Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan By Department 10 10 10** 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Public Utilities 13 12 12 11 12 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 Public Services 3 3 4 4 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 Police 4 56 5 5 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 All Other Departments 10 10 10 11 12 5 6 6 3 4 4 4 Totals 30 30 31 31 31 13* 13 13 10 12 13 11 30 *April 2010: Police understated by one. Six vacancies existed in April. June 2010: One Officer began terminal leave in April. **May 2010: Incorrect numbers reported. One vacant position filled with temp, position included in totals in chart: Central Services *Significant decrease in number of Open Positions due to positions no longer being funded during Budget Process. Public Utilities: Grounds Worker (1), Motor Equipment Operator II/Water (1), Construction & Inspection Manager (1), and Engineering Fieldman Crew Leader (1) Public Services: Emergency Management Coordinator (1) Police: Police Master Corporal (1) and Patrolman (1) All Other Departments: Custodian I (1), Assistant Library Director (1), Programmer Analyst (1), and Sr. LAN Analyst (due to A. Siegel currently acting as IT Director) 6 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011

HUMAN RESOURCES continued Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Bonus Program Category Total 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Stop Program‐Sensibly Taking Off Pounds(weigh‐ins) 20 ‐ 20 24 41 42 42 29 10 5 13 7 ‐ 253 Caught Doing it Right‐Promotes employees productivity & 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 3 1 ‐ 2 63 ‐ 72 creativity (submissions) Breathe Program‐Rewards for 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 ‐ 7 ending tobacco use (submissions) Ducs in a Row‐Doing Useful ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Community Service (submissions) Workers Comp Injuries 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Public Utilit ies Public Services Police Others Public Utilities: 0 Public Services: 3 Police: 3 All Other Depts.: 1 Workers Comp Hours 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Ja n‐ Feb‐ Ma r‐ Apr‐ Ma y‐ Jun‐ Jul ‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Public Ut ilities Public Services Police Ot hers Public Utilities: 160 Public Services: 200 Police: 0 All Other Depts.: 0 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011 7

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Service Requests Resolved Citizen Action Center ‐ Customers w/ New Issues 300 150 127 124 250 130 110 108 200 182 177 170 171 153 163 151 153 153 150 154 90 79 150 70 66 119 120 59 54 50 43 44 37 100 34 32 32 30 50 10 Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Programming Requests Completed Page Views ‐ City of Dover Web Page 40 80,000 34 35 70,000 30 25 60,000 Pages View ed 25 22 50,000 19 20 20 69,485 66,869 16 40,000 65,764 15 15 15 61,049 14 15 11 10 30,000 36,994 38,684 39,610 39,576 35,631 34,959 38,777 30,819 33,649 10 20,000 3 5 10,000 0 0 Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Same Current Last Performance Indicators Month Month Month Last Year iSeries Availability 100% 100% 100% Server Availability 100% 100% 100% AS/400 Connections N/A N/A N/A (concurrent/authorized users) PCs Supported 336 339 342 Scheduled PCs Replaced ‐ ‐ ‐ Servers Supported 15 16 16 People Trained 2 12 18 Availability Statistics based on 7:00 AM until 5:00 PM Monday—Friday 8 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011

PARKS, RECREATION & LIBRARY Library Adult Services Children Services 2000 1000 1600 750 1200 500 800 250 400 0 0 Jan- Feb- M ar- A pr- M ay- Jun- Jul- A ug- Sep- Oct- No v- Dec- Jan- Jan- Feb- M ar- A pr- M ay- Jun- Jul- A ug- Sep- Oct- No v- Dec- Jan- 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Reference Reader's A dviso ry Outreach Electro nic A ssistance Reference Reader's A dviso ry Outreach Electro nic A ssistance Reference: 88 Reader’s Advisory: 14 Reference: 76 Reader’s Advisory: 9 Outreach: 0 Electronic Assistance: 26 Outreach: 0 Electronic Assistance: 35 CIRCULATION JANUARY 2011 FYTD 2011 JANUARY 2010 FYTD 2010 Dover Residents 16,708 119,372 14,328 110,960 Kent County Residents* 15,775 160,269 13,757 106,795 Non‐County Residents 1,905 10,232 1,241 8,533 REGISTRATIONS Dover Residents 220 1,635 282 1,669 Kent County Residents* 79 697 142 1,024 Non‐County Residents 7 74 18 125 OTHER Visiting Patrons 29,291 215,938 30,756 230,435 Meeting Room Usage 180 1,620 400 1,680 Photocopier Usage 1,476 10,872 1,409 11,197 Dial‐A‐Story 1,014 8,348 1,803 10,515 Computer Usage 4,220 31,423 4,534 34,274 Holds (Total) 6,549 47,317 5,928 38,876 *Breakout of Kent County Residential Statistics Circulation Registrations Harrington: 216 Harrington: 1 Smyrna: 929 Smyrna: 10 Milford: 174 Milford: 0 Outside City Limits: 14,456 Outside City Limits: 68 Total Registered Users: (Card Holders) City: 17,538 Kent County: 13,726 Outside Kent County: 1,619 Other Points of Interest: Interlibrary: 4,686 items loaned out Technical services: 1,397 items added 3,533 items borrowed 952 items deleted Volunteers: 223 hours of service completed City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011 9

Parks and Recreation Recreation Revenue Recreation Revenue Breakdown $30,000 $35,000 $25,000 $30,000 $20,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $15,000 $10,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ Jan‐ Feb‐ Mar‐ Apr‐ May‐ Jun‐ Jul‐ Aug‐ Sep‐ Oct‐ Nov‐ Dec‐ Jan‐ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 General Rent al Payment s Sports Leagues Trips General: $1,000 Rental Payments: $687 Sports: $1,000 Leagues: $850 Trips: $269 Rentals JANUARY 2011 FYTD 2011 JANUARY 2010 FYTD 2010 Baseball/Softball Field Rentals* ‐ 111 ‐ 108 Dover Park Pavilions (2) ‐ 18 ‐ 18 Multipurpose/Field Hockey Field Rentals* ‐ 54 ‐ 44 Recreation Center – Dover Park 5 114 8 71 Silver Lake Pavilions (2) / Schutte (1) ‐ 34 1 31 Soccer Field Rentals* ‐ 9 ‐ 10 Stage – Mobile Platform ‐ 19 3 16 *These numbers reflect groups that utilized our facilities during January. Program Attendance* JANUARY 2011 FYTD 2011 JANUARY 2010 FYTD 2010 No January 2011 programs. *This number reflects activities that took place in January. (Not included on the JWP report.) Pitts Center ‐ Total Program Attendence FREE Open Gym Registration Cards* ‐ through 1/31/2011 Total Cards Issued: 4,056 20,000 City Residents: 1,838 ‐ (45%) 12,692 Non‐City Residents: 2,218 ‐ (55%) 15,000 12,043 ‐ Kent County: 1,796 ‐ (44%) # of people ‐ Sussex County: 143 ‐ (3%) 10,000 7,374 7,614 ‐ New Castle County: 96 ‐ (2%) 5,753 3,886 ‐ Out of State: 183 ‐ (5%) 2,995 3,329 2,018 2,307 2,041 2,447 1,340 5,000 *The cards permit entrance to the facility during 0 scheduled Public Gym Periods at no charge. Jan- Feb- M ar- A pr- M ay- Jun- Jul- A ug- Sep- Oct- No v- Dec- Jan- 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011

PUBLIC SERVICES Administration Administrative review and inspection services continued on all residential and commercial developments. The following residential subdivisions are in various phases of construction: Oak Shadows Emerald Pointe Lexington Glenn Village of Westover (Phase VI) Farthing Woods Nottingham Meadows Stoney Creek (Phase II) Clearview Meadows Village of Cannon Mill Patriot Village Eden Hill (Residential) Sanitation Sanitation Hours Monthly Total Refuse (Tons) 1200 1,067 1,500 1000 898 1,002 1,029 1,028 983 1,018 972 1,000 919 919 904 800 815 774 779 618 558 636 569 600 522 470 418 439 408 363 500 354 359 353 400 233 251 226 167 188 200 39 49 0 9 ‐ 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Bulk Collection Mechanized Hand Trash Container Electronic Goods 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Collection Collection Repair/Delivery Pickup Bulk Automated Jan 11 Jan 10 JANUARY 2011 FYTD 2011 JANUARY 2010 FYTD 2010 Trips to DSWA Sandtown Landfill 193 1,639 226 1,677 Total Tonnage to DSWA 966.76 8,486.19 1,048.18 9,181.74 90‐Gallon Containers Delivered 12 139 32 218 300‐Gallon Containers Delivered 3 30 1 23 Total Man Hours ‐ Containers Delivered 39 351 49 273 CURBSIDE RECYCLING TOTAL # OF TOTAL # OF WEIGHT/LBS. AVG. LBS. STATS HOUSEHOLDS ACCOUNTS JANUARY 2011 16,488 7,835 233,460 14.16 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011 11

STREETS JANUARY 2011 FYTD 2011 JANUARY 2010 FYTD 2010 Signed Installed 15 136 23 134 Signs Repaired 38 137 18 98 Curbs Painted Yellow (Ft.) ‐ 833 ‐ 240 New Post Installed ‐ 50 8 48 Storm Catch Basins Repaired ‐ 30 ‐ 5 Storm Catch Basin Repairing (Hrs.) ‐ 196 ‐ 44 Hot Mix Patching (Tons) ‐ 93 ‐ 651 Hot Mix Patching (Hrs.) ‐ 348 ‐ 1,114 Cold Mix Patching Hrs.) 72 224 72 204 Concrete Work (Hrs) ‐ 221 ‐ 150 Concrete Patching (Cubic Yards) ‐ 37 ‐ 12 Street and Alley Maintenance (Hrs) 155 1,089 68 930 Ditch Work (Hrs). ‐ 65 ‐ 22 Street Sweeping (Miles) 303 5,677 381 6,414 Street Sweeping (Cubic Yards) 120 1,359 35 1,068 Leaves Collected (Cubic Yards) 325 5,825 275 10,861 Leaf Collection (Miles) 420 5,745 570 5,707 GROUNDS ‐ Arborist Crew JANUARY 2011 JANUARY 2010 Trees Trimmed 30 39 Trees Removed 15 24 – Crew worked at the following locations: Dover Park, Crossgates, Elm Terrace, and the Fox Hall ditch. – Assisted with snow removal efforts. Beautification Crew – Picked up Christmas trees for chipping. – Began cleaning greenhouse in preparation for the new season. Grounds Maintenance/Mowing Crews – Assisted with chipping brush and hauling chipping Christmas trees. Special Projects Crew – Assisted all crews with tree work, snow removal and Christmas tree collection. 12 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011

Economic Development UNEMPLOYMENT RATES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 City of Dover 9.8% 10.3% 9.4% 9.4% 9.4% 10.2% 9.8% 10.2% 10.1% 10.3% 10.1% 9.4% Pending National & State averages (US‐9.4% & State‐8.5%) Source: State of Delaware Department of Labor Number of contacts made with small businesses and with out‐of‐town companies interested in locating to Dover. TYPE YTD Contacts Made Small Businesses 11 Out‐of‐town Companies 10 Staff attended the Kent Economic Partnership meeting. Staff met with Kathy McDaniel to discuss expansion of the McDaniel Industrial Park and with the new CEO of Fordham Brewery to discuss marketing. Conference calls were held with the State Director for Senator Coons and the State Director for Senator Carney. Economic Development director was interviewed by the Delaware State News during a visit to the Dover Sun Park site, as background for a series of articles on the project. Downtown Dover Partnership Annual Main Street Self‐Assessment was completed and submitted to the Delaware Economic Development Office. Staff met with the Delaware Facilities Management Office to discuss management of the Water Street Parking Lot during it’s transition to courthouse parking. Staff provided technical assistance to six current and prospective business owners, applying for SBA guaranteed loans. Staff will be meeting with contractors to get estimates for renovations at 22‐24 West Loockerman Street, as requested by the DDP Board. The next DDP sponsored event will be the St. Patrick’s Day parade. Registration information for this event has been sent to community groups, schools, businesses, in addition to local and state officials. City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011 13

Life Safety Inspections JANUARY 2011 FYTD 2011 JANUARY 2010 FYTD 2010 Fire Protection Inspections (new & existing) 30 379 12 180 Fire Code Inspections 16 695 13 424 Inspection Deficiencies 11 710 ‐ 502 Certificate of Occupancy 1 39 3 59 Non‐Inspection Hours Office 94 729 45 730 Meetings 46 306 20 273 Plan Review 39 294 20 369 Training 177 379 ‐ 362 Fire Investigations 46 132 25 200 Damage Cost Accidental $20,000 $ 88,950 $1,000 $342,000 Incendiary ‐ $192,550 $ 800 $133,300 Undetermined ‐ $ 22,600 ‐ $ 29,000 Permitting and Inspections Permits Issued JANUARY 2011 FYTD 2011 JANUARY 2010 FYTD 2010 Administrative Permit ‐ 12 1 16 Building Addition/Renovation Permits 25 348 23 291 Building Permits 3 75 12 71 Demolition Permits 3 16 3 27 Fence Permits 5 46 4 51 Fire Prevention Permits 12 52 6 46 Mechanical Permits 25 179 35 262 Plumbing Permits 27 311 25 313 Sign Permits 25 144 29 165 Swimming Pool Permits ‐ 2 0 1 Licenses Issued Business Licenses 30 1,517 43 1,175 Merchant Licenses 3 275 7 278 Contractor Licenses 20 790 34 722 Lodging House Licenses 31 31 15 40 Mobile Homes 2 231 365 711 Public Occupancy 205 239 66 250 Rental Dwelling 1,715 1,779 987 1,753 Building Inspections Permits Issued JANUARY 2011 FYTD 2011 JANUARY 2010 FYTD 2010 Building 311 2,680 285 2,675 Plumbing/Mechanical 266 2,618 78 1,808 Certificate of Occupancy 11 131 6 164 14 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) – Coded voters for City Clerk’s Office. – Performed ArcGIS 10 Upgrade. – Rebuilt all Web Mapping Applications due to upgrade. – Created and printed numerous maps, banners and posters for Downtown Dover Partnership. – Created and printed multiple voting district maps for the City Clerk’s Office. Dangerous Building/Demolition Status – January 2011 66 Washington Street  Declared dangerous by City Council on October 12, 2009.  Building permit obtained by property owner on February 5, 2010 and expired on August 5, 2010 with no inspections scheduled or completed in relation to the building permit.  City will proceed with notifying property owner of our intent to conduct an asbestos survey and abatement and will secure bids for demolition.  Demolition bids were received on December 7, 2010. Low bid authorized by City Manager.  Demolition was delayed until February 2011 due to contractor availability. 715 Slaughter Street (Complete ‐ No Further Action Required)  Declared dangerous by City Council on May 24, 2010.  Asbestos survey & report completed on October 1, 2010.  Asbestos abatement and removal completed on October 7, 2010.  Bids received on October 13, 2010.  Public Service Manager is awaiting receipt of bids from the City’s Contract and Procurement Manager. Low bid from Sunnyfield Contractors in the amount of $2,950.00 approved by City Manager on October 19, 2010.  Demolition was completed in November 2010. Paperwork to place lien on the property has been forwarded to Administrative Services. Total cost was $7,598.75. 628 N. West Street (Complete ‐ No Further Action Required)  Pool declared dangerous by City Council on August 23, 2010.  Demolition quotes received on October 12, 2010.  Low quote is currently being reviewed. Low bid from Sunnyfield Contractors in the amount of $3,900.00 has been submitted to the City Manager for Authorization to Purchase.  Demolition was completed in November 2010. Paperwork to place lien on the property has been forwarded to Administrative Services. Total cost was $3,900.00. 749 West North Street  Declared dangerous by City Council on October 25, 2010.  Asbestos survey was conducted in December 2010.  Asbestos abatement was completed in January 2011.  Demolition bids received in January 2011.  Demolition activity began on January 31, 2011. 301 South Governors Avenue  Declared dangerous by City Council on October 25, 2010.  Asbestos survey was conducted in December 2010.  Asbestos abatement began in late January 2011.  Demolition bids received in January 2011.  Demolition is scheduled for mid‐February 2011. 35 North New Street  Declared dangerous by City Council on November 22, 2010.  Asbestos survey conducted on January 19, 2011.  Demolition bids were received in January 2011.  Asbestos abatement scheduled for February 3, 2011.  Demolition activity scheduled to begin on February 14, 2011. City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011 15

PUBLIC UTILITIES Electric System Peak Total System Load 200.0 100,000 5 0 ,8 5 1 164.1 164.0 90,000 8 2 160.2 4 ,2 155.7 3 9 , 8 4 7 4 80,000 3 7 3 3 4 7 4 ,4 6 7 ,3 6 6 ,5 ,4 128.1 70,000 7 3 6 4 150.0 3 6 5 0 ,1 2 ,7 0 2 5 0 3 6 6 ,8 7 9 6 ,0 9 6 ,0 112.9 5 5 ,7 6 4 60,000 5 107.7 108.2 2 107.0 5 104.0 5 104 98.1 94.75 50,000 100.0 40,000 30,000 20,000 50.0 10,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Outages Customers of Gained/Lost 35 7,000 60 52 30 6,000 48 50 25 5,000 40 Outages Customers 20 4,000 30 15 3,000 24 10 2,000 20 13 11 11 10 5 1,000 9 9 8 8 10 5 3 0 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Outages Customers 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Outages: 4 Customers: 107 Electric Month ly Ou tage Report The annual o utage goal will be less than 295 minutes per c ustomer, w hich is a Delaware Standard. This will be measured by calculating the System Average Interruption Duration Index. FY 2011 YTD FY 2010 FY 2009 75. 41 160. 14 155. 17 Controllable Outages Average Response Time Annual goal is less than 40 Goal is less than 30 minutes Month Year‐to‐date Month Year‐to‐date 2 27 83.25 Minutes 44.25 Minutes 16 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011

Electric Engineering Design JANUARY JANUARY Major Program Updates DIFF FY 2011 YTD FY 2010 2011 2010 Extensions Design Completed Within 30 days ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 of complete Submission New Underground Installation % Completed New Underground Installation % Completed  Kent General Hospital Ongoing  Farthing Woods Ongoing  Crossgates Development Ongoing  Buchanan Acres Ongoing JANUARY JANUARY PROGRAM UPDATES FY 2011 YTD 2011 2010 Tree Trimming 246 168 1538 Number of Oil Releases 3 ‐ 5 Lost Time Accidents – All Electric Utility Divisions ‐ ‐ ‐ New Services 8 3 75 Major Goals Completed in the Past Two Months City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011 17

Water/Wastewater Water Production/Billed Consumption/Flow to Kent County 300,000,000 250,000,000 200,000,000 150,000,000 100,000,000 50,000,000 0 Jan 10 Feb 10 Mar 10 Apr 10 May 10 Jun 10 Jul 10 Aug 10 Sep 10 Oct 10 Nov 10 Dec 10 Jan 11 Total Water Prod. Billed Consumpt. Total Flow to County City Readings ENGINEERING SUMMARY JANUARY JANUARY Major Program Updates DIFF FY 2011 YTD FY 2010 2011 2010 State and Federal Violations 0 violations 0 violations ‐ ‐ ‐ Water Quality Complaints 1 11 ‐10 78 150 Plan Review Completed Within 30 days of 3 plans 8 plans ‐5 94% 99% Submission 100% 100% plans Field Inspection Response within 48 hours of 100% 100% ‐ 100% 100% Request Major Goals Completed in the Past Two Months  Water main installation began for the proposed Dover Anchor Library. OPERATIONAL SUMMARY JANUARY JANUARY Task Current FYTD 2011 2010 Water Production – Daily Average 3,950,871 3,892,129 1,042,188,000 Average Field Response Time (goal is < 30 minutes) 21.5 16.3 20.6 Water Mains Repaired 3 5 17 Water Service Lines Repaired ‐ 2 12 Wastewater Mains Repaired ‐ 5 6 Wastewater Service Lines Repaired 2 5 6 Sewer Lines Flushed – Linear Feet 26,181 73,831 519,308 Percentage of Flow Sent to Kent County vs. Gallons Billed 100% 121% 104% (inflow/Infiltration monitoring) Total Water Meters in City Distribution System 13,893 13,772 65 Lost Time Accidents – All Water/Wastewater Divisions ‐ ‐ 2 18 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2011

CITY PLANNER’S MONTHLY REPORT Public Services Group P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Phone: (302) 736-7010 Fax (302) 736-4217 January 2011 PERSONNEL Dawn Melson-Williams and 3 Planning Commission members attended an APA Audio Web Conference “Retrofitting Corridors” that was held on January 19th at the Kent County Administration Building. The event was co-sponsored by the Delaware Chapter of APA and the Dover/Kent County MPO. The Planning Office participated in a Staff Retreat held at the Community Services Building on January 31, 2011. Topics covered education and training opportunities, general office operations, and projects and priorities for the coming year. EDEN HILL FARM TND In January, the follow-up inspection of Ann Moore Park showed completion of the installation of park furniture (benches, bike racks, trash cans). As a result, Final Certificates of Occupancy were issued for a series of seven townhouse units on Ann Moore Street. For the Residential District of Eden Hill Farm Traditional Neighborhood Design a total of 42 dwelling units are complete of the 51 permits approved for dwelling units. No additional permits were filed in January. Construction activity is ongoing on a series of seven townhouse units on South Greenberry Lane and two duplex units on Ruth Way where permits were previously issued. City Staff continues to work with the project developer Hill Farm Associates in regards to timely payment and installation of street lighting. Planning Staff comments were issued on January 6th for the Administrative Plan (MI-10-20) pertaining to lot revisions in a portion of Phase 2 of the Residential District. The proposed revisions focused on conversion of townhouse lots to a width of 20 feet and the conversion of some single family dwelling lots to duplex lots (as allowed by the Planning Commission). The review identified plan compliance issues with the Pattern Book standards as interpreted by Planning Staff. Following a meeting with the applicant in late January to discuss the matter, the applicant is reviewing their options and may request Planning Commission consideration of the issue. In January, there was no specific activity associated with the Professional Office, Medical & Financial District. For the Neighborhood Commercial District, no plan submissions (Check Prints) have been received since the Planning Commission’s action on the Revised Implementation Plan (Revision #2-Updated Plan of October 1, 2010) in October. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Planning Staff continues to focus efforts on the implementation items identified in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as amended. Planning Staff presented draft text amendments relating to solar and wind energy systems to the Utility Committee in January; the formal review process is expected to follow. Staff continues to work on a draft text amendment for the application processing provisions of Zoning Ordinance, Article 10. The set of Comprehensive Plan Amendments for 2011 (MI-11-01) was prepared for review and a First Reading setting the public hearing dates occurred on January 24th at the City Council meeting. The proposed amendments focus on items related to the creation and adoption of the Recreational and Open

Space Zone (ROS) with an update to Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix and selected revisions to Map 12-1: Land Development Plan. Also there two applicant initiated amendments to the Land Development Plan map to be considered. The Planning Office Retreat also set a Work Plan for 2011 which continues to include various projects and ordinance development activities associated with the Comprehensive Plan Implementation. Other Activities New Dover High School Project (C-10-05) - Planning Staff continues to be involved in the various planning discussions and review activities related to the new Dover High School project proposed to be constructed Forrest Avenue (Route 8). Review of a Land Subdivision Regulations Waiver (Street Right-of-way width) for the project was originally scheduled for the January 26th Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting; however, the meeting was cancelled due to inclement weather and was rescheduled for February. PERMITTING AND LICENSING REVIEW The Planning Staff is part of the Building Permit review process. Our activities involving reviewing specific types of permit applications for compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and for compliance with any conditions of approval from the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment, or Historic District Commission. Permits Reviewed January-11 Permits Permits (Issued) Reviewed Reviewed YTD YTD 2010 2011 Building 12 16 12 Additions/Renovations Permits Building Permits 2 12 2 Demolition Permits 3 3 3 Fence Permits 5 4 5 Sign Permits 9 12 9 Temporary Sign Permits 2 7 2 Swimming Pool Permits 0 0 0 Certificate of Occupancy 11 6 11 Total # Permits 44 60 44 Reviewed (Issued) CODE ENFORCEMENT Case Type # cases # cases % staff % staff current month YTD initiated initiated YTD current month No valid rental permit 1 1 100% 100% No valid building permit 4 4 75% 75% Tall grass and weeds 0 0 0% 0% Unregistered vehicle 0 0 0% 0% Abandoned vehicle 4 4 50% 50% Annual Housing 32 32 97% 97% Inspection Property Maintenance – 18 18 67% 67% Exterior

Electric Termination 0 0 0% 0% Dover Code of 47 47 47% 47% Ordinances Zoning 9 9 89% 89% Total Cases 115 115 Total # of Inspections 318 The Code Enforcement Division and Fire Marshal’s Office conducted joint inspections of several House of Pride properties on January 4, 2011. Numerous violations found during October 2010 inspections had not been corrected. The Code Enforcement Division also performed inspections of other House of Pride properties in late January and identified code violations that must be corrected. The Code Enforcement Division and Fire Marshal’s Office coordinated closely with the Planning Office, as the violations relate to the Conditional Use review by the Planning Commission on January 18, 2011, where the Planning Commission required that all violations be corrected within 30 days or the Conditional Use Permit would be revoked. Follow-up inspections are scheduled for February. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FISCAL YEAR 09-10 CDBG PROJECTS U Homeowner Rehabilitation Program FY09 Four (4) homes are underway (814 River Road, 40 Bertrand Drive, 508 Walker Road and 106 Gordon Place). CDBG FY10 PROJECTS Habitat for Humanity Buyers are scheduled to go to settlement at the end of February. First State Resource Conservation & Redevelopment Council (RC &D) Emergency repairs have been completed on 12 homes in the City of Dover. Homeownership Assistance Program Two clients have purchased properties in the City of Dover. Connections Community Support Program Ten homeless individuals received motel vouchers for temporary housing for the month of January. Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) The City was awarded $1,426,740 for the acquisition and rehab of foreclosed properties to be sold to qualifying families. A total of $1,249,467 has been expended on the acquisition and renovations for 8 properties. The remaining balance of $177,272 will be utilized for renovations and acquisition. Three properties have been sold, three are for sale, one is a lease purchase and one is a rental that serves persons with disabilities. The following lists the status of each NSP property: 218 Ann Avenue (sold) 337 N. Governors Avenue (for sale) 343 Mimosa Avenue (sold) 254 Green Blade Drive (sold) 907 Woodcrest Avenue (lease purchase) 302 Stonebrook Place (for sale) 1430 S. Hancock (group home) 11 Westover Drive (for sale)

MEETING REPORTS Board of Adjustment: The Board of Adjustment did not meet on January 19, 2011. The next regular scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment is scheduled for February 16, 2011. Historic District Commission: The Historic District Commission did not meet for the regular meeting on January 20, 2011. The next regular Historic District Commission meeting is scheduled for February 17, 2011 Planning Commission The Planning Commission met on January 18, 2011 and took the actions summarized listed below. The next scheduled Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for February 22, 2011. 1. Z-11-01 Lands of F&B Properties at 293 South Saulsbury Road - Moved to forward recommendation of approval to City Council for rezoning from C-3/COZ-1 to C-2A/COZ-1. 2. C-08-01 House of Pride at Properties on North New Street and South New Street - Moved to grant an extension of thirty (30) days to allow this organization to come into compliance. 1) It should be noted as part of the motion that 35 N. New Street is not applicable and is specifically excluded. 2) That 16 N. New Street and 102 S. New Street being unoccupied, are also excluded from these matters and will include revocation of the Conditional Use for these two (2) properties. They could be brought back for Conditional Use in the future. If it fails, it would be a “go no go” on the 30th day of extension that you are there or you are not and that they are within full compliance within thirty (30) days. If it does not happen, then you have an attorney that can restore it and get it going again by doing it in another thirty (30) days where we could revisit the whole matter. The extension for thirty (30) days would start from today and would be a “go no go” where it would be a Staff administrative decision that would not have to come back before the Planning Commission. A subsequent amendment to the motion clarified the motion to state that each property would stand independent of one another; and if approval can be granted on any one of them, it would independently be given Conditional Use for one year and to be revisited at that time. Submitted by: Ann Marie Townshend, AICP Planning & Community Development Director

Delivered via January Monthly Report March 14, 2011 Mr. Kenneth Hogan, Council President PO Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 RE: Updated CIP (2010-2020 Apparatus Schedule) Dear President Hogan: As per the Haggerty and Haggerty recommendations approved by City Council on May 26, 2009, please find attached an updated Capital Investment Plan (CIP) for the years 2010 thru 2020. Due to the current economic situation, I have thoroughly reviewed the apparatus schedule and determined that there is not a need to replace Engine 7 in fiscal year 2013 and have removed the purchase from the schedule. This revision should save the City of Dover approximately $594,997.00. In lieu of replacing Engine 7, I am respectfully requesting to outfit Rescue 1 with Holmatro Equipment. Currently, Rescue 1 is the only piece of apparatus in the fleet that does not have this equipment (is equipped with outdated Hurst equipment that is over 20 years old). By outfitting with Holmatro, Rescue 1 will be consistent with other apparatus and equipment can be interchanged during an incident, if needed. The cost to replace this equipment is $56,234.00 (copy of proposal attached) and will be a one-time expense. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Yours in Service, Jack I. Fortney, Jr. Jack I. Fortney, Jr. Fire Chief 103 South Governors Avenue ● Dover, Delaware 19904 Headquarters: (302) 736-7168 ● Fire Chief’s Office: (302) 736-7167 ● FAX: (302) 736-7166

FISCAL YEAR 2010-2020 APPARATUS SCHEDULE FISCAL YEAR 2010-2020 APPARATUS SCHEDULE Fiscal Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Ladder 2 92,910 92,910 92,910 92,910 92,910 464,550 Engine 2 (555,000) 195,300 195,300 390,600 Engine 7 (585,000) Ladder 1 (920,000) 195,300 195,300 195,300 195,300 195,300 195,300 195,300 1,367,100 Engine 3 (600,000) 85,714 85,714 85,714 85,714 85,714 85,714 514,284 Engine 6 (615,000) 87,857 87,857 87,857 87,857 87,857 439,285 Engine 4 (630,000) 90,000 90,000 180,000 Holmatro Rescue 1 56,234 Totals: 288,210 288,210 344,444 288,210 288,210 281,014 368,871 368,871 368,871 263,571 263,571

holmatro rescue equipment EQUIPMENT, INC. :s::s: Sales' Service' Training' Installations Emergency Services Equipment 1/19/2011 Holmatro CORE Rescue Systems Bid Proposal Dover Fire Company, DE I Quantityl Part Description 2 CORE DPU 31 Honda Duo Pump**, LED Lighting, 52 Ibs 1 CORE 4035NCT 5.66" Cutter*** 57,320 Ibs Cutting, 33.51bs 1 CORE 4050NCT 7.5" HD Cutter *** 208,000 Ibs Cutting, 40.5 Ibs 1 CORE 4150UL Combi Tool*** 16, 1661bs Sprd, 67,600 Ibs Cut, 351bs 1 CORE 4240UL 27" Spreader***33,625 Ibs Spread, 41.5 Ibs 2 HRS22 Ram Support Device 2 CORE 4340 Mini T-Ram** 49,145/18,210 Ibs Sprd, 12"-23" Rng, 27 Ibs 2 CORE 4350 Medium T-Ram** 49,145/18210 Ibs Sprd, 21"-50" Rng, 40 Ibs 1 ESI Custom Installation 1 1/2 Gallon Mineral Oil 1 Limited Life-Time Warranty 1 One-Year Service Contract on Above Equipment 1 Delivery & Prep Fee (Includes Fuel) TOTAL SALE PRICE $ 56,234 * UL Listed Tools ** NFPA Compliant *** Both UL & NFPA Bid Prices Valid For 90 Days From Date Of Proposal Patrick K. Grubb Vice President Central Office: Headquarters: 1-800-574-8228 717-354-2310 440 Horsham Road, Suites 4 & 5 Fax: 717-354-8431 Horsham, PA 19044 West Office: 267-803-1440 esii nfo@cavtel.net 412-287-2218 Fax: 267-803-1447 www.esiequipment.com Fax: 412-264-0890

Date Range: From 01/ 01/ 2011 to 01/ 31/ 2011 Incidents by Situation Found Dover Fire Department Situation Found 20 Fire 0 Overpressure Rupture, Exp Overpressure Rupture, Exp 1 Rescue & Emergency Medica Rescue & Emergency Medica 5 Hazardous Condition (No F Hazardous Condition (No F 7 Service Call Fire 14 Good Intent Call 25 False Alarm & False Call 0 Severe Weather & Natural Service Call 0 Special Incident Type 0 Blank Severe Weather & Natural Special Incident Type Blank Good Intent Call False Alarm & False Call Date: 02/28/2011 Page: 1

Date Range: From 01/ 01/ 2011 to 01/ 31/ 2011 Manpower Hours by Sitation Found Dover Fire Department Num ber of Hours by Situation Found Sum of # Attending X Incident Length Rescue & Emergency Medica 169 Fire Overpressure Rupture, Exp 0 Overpressure Rupture, Exp 9 Rescue & Emergency Medica 396 Hazardous Condition (No F 63 Service Call 85 Good Intent Call Fire 123 False Alarm & False Call 0 Severe Weather & Natural 0 Special Incident Type Hazardous Condition (No F Severe Weather & Natural Special Incident Type False Alarm & False Call Good Intent Call Service Call Date: 02/28/2011 Page: 1

Date Range: From 01/ 01/ 2011 to 01/ 31/ 2011 Alarms by Month of Year Dover Fire Department 72 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Date: 02/28/2011 Page: 1

Date Range: From 01/01/2011 to 01/31/2011 Incident Run Log Company: All Companies Dover Fire Department Sorted by: Incident Number Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type 01/01/2011 30046 2011-000001 14:54 19 SUTTON DR Cooking fire, confined to container Call for an AFA, alarm company contacted the residence and they advised accidental/unattended cooking; however, they did not have proper pass code. Dover 16 responded and investigated to find a pot on the stove with nothing in it. Placed under control and returned. 01/01/2011 30046 2011-000002 22:14 1200 N DUPONT HWY Good intent call, other POPCORN IN MICROWAVE. 01/02/2011 30046 2011-000003 13:50 816 LINCOLN ST Cooking fire, confined to container RESPONDED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS FOR A REPORT OF AN AUTOMATIC FIRE ACTIVATION. AN INVESTIGATION FOUND UNATTENDED COOKING WAS THE CAUSE OF THE ACTIVATION. 01/02/2011 30046 2011-000004 22:52 2030 GENERALS WAY B Cooking fire, confined to container UNATTENDED COOKING TRIPPED SMOKE DETECTOR. NO FURTHER ACTION. TURNED OVER TO BUILDING MAINTENANCE. 01/03/2011 30046 2011-000005 11:54 1200 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional AFA, 2nd floor west smoke detector activation, call from DES. Security called and advised contractors in the building set off the detector, no need for fd. University Village building 3 01/03/2011 30046 2011-000006 12:58 1450 FORREST AVE Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill Call for a gasoline spill at the fuel pumps (10-15 Gallons). Upon arrival, crews helped place stay dry down to contain the spill. The fuel came from a line disconnected from the fuel pump. 01/03/2011 30046 2011-000007 13:14 708 WILLIAM ST System malfunction, other Call for a general fire alarm at building 708. Upon arrival, crews found the system all ready reset. Scene turned over to FM4 01/04/2011 30046 2011-000008 11:55 800 N STATE ST Service Call, other Call from DPD to assist them with retrieving a gun from Silver Lake (in the area of the bridge near McGlynns). Crews responded and entered the water with an ice suit on to retrieve the gun which was then given to DPD. 01/05/2011 30046 2011-000009 20:47 826 S BRADFORD ST Cooking fire, confined to container Unattended Cooking 01/05/2011 30046 2011-000010 21:47 239 N NEW ST Cooking fire, confined to container The Dover Fire Department responded to 239 N New St in reference to an unattended cooking incident. On arrival, contacted the resident who had over cooked food on the stove. The fire department set up positive pressure to remove the smoke then returned. No further action taken. 01/05/2011 30046 2011-000011 22:59 1580 S DUPONT HWY Good intent call, other Responded for a gas leak. Arrived and searched the area but met with negative results. 01/06/2011 30046 2011-000012 05:13 132 S NEW ST False alarm or false call, other Units responded for a pull station activation in zone 3 of the above address. Crews investigated and found no pull station pulled and no alarm was sounding . Scene was turned over to respondent for further. Officers Notes: Attempt to contact management ref no alarm panel in the building being investigated. 01/06/2011 30046 2011-000013 17:41 640 S STATE ST Water problem, other The Dover FIre Department responded to Bayhealth ER in reference to a possible fire in a first floor bathroom. E-4 arrived and investigation revealed that a mental patient in the custody of DSP had gone into a bathroom and damaged the sprinkler head which activated the sprinkler system. DFD personnel and building maintenance secured the water to the sprinkler system and Rescue 54 responded to the scene and assisted DFD personnel and hospital staff with water removal. City FM 4 was alerted and made a response to the scene. Once the water was removed from the hallways, all fire department personnel returned to Headquarters. 01/06/2011 30046 2011-000014 19:03 300 HIAWATHA LA System malfunction, other 01/06/2011 30046 2011-000015 19:10 135 HAMAN DR False alarm or false call, other Responded to building 135 Haman Drive for an alarm activation. On arrival, contacted maintenance who advised that a dryer hose had become dislodged and acitvated the alarm system. No further action taken. 01/06/2011 30046 2011-000016 21:54 224 BRADLEY RD Service Call, other DFD responded to 224 Bradley Rd in reference to a gas leak inside the residence. On arrival, it was learned that the odor of gas was actually two kerosene heaters in the garage. Chesapeake utilities was notified to respond to the scene to turn on the gas to the residence that DFD personnel had shut off. No further action taken. 01/07/2011 30046 2011-000017 02:36 51 WEBBS LA N Vicinity alarm (incident in other location) The Dover Fire Department responded to 51 Webbs Lane in reference to a smoke investigation. On arrival crews checke the building but met with negative results. No further action taken. 01/07/2011 30046 2011-000018 09:51 150 SAULSBURY RD Water problem, other BROKEN WATER LINE IN CEILING TRIPPED ALARM SYSTEM. SHUT DOWN WATER LINE AND CONTACTED SIMPLEX GRINNEL TO FIX SYSTEM. TURNED OVER TO MAINTENANCE AND F.M. 4. 01/07/2011 30046 2011-000019 10:08 130 MAPLE GLENN DRIVE Good intent call, other REPORTED AS A ODOR OF GAS. NOYHING FOUND. 01/07/2011 30046 2011-000020 21:10 17 SPRUANCE RD Cooking fire, confined to container Date: 02/28/2011 Page: 1 Time:10:48

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type The Dover Fire Department responded to 17 Spruance Rd in reference to an alarm activation. On arrival, firefighters located unattended cooking which caused the alarm to activate. No damage. No action taken. 01/08/2011 30046 2011-000021 03:21 880 TOWNSEND BLVD Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other The Dover Fire Department responded to 880 Townsend Blvd in reference to an electrical fire. On arrival, crews checked the basement room in question and located the electrical outlet that appeared to have taken a power surge. E3's crew secured the power to the outlet and advised the resident to contact an electrician. No further action taken. 01/08/2011 30046 2011-000022 22:52 1225 WALKER RD Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional On site manager stated steam from kitchen set off smoke detector. After walk though by crews scene was cleared. 01/09/2011 30046 2011-000023 15:34 118 SHADOW CT Building fire The Dover Fire Department responded to 118 Shadow Court in reference to a house fire. On arrival, E4 officer (15) observed a two story residence with fire showing from the attic area above the garage area. E4 established a water supply from the hydrant at Baker Turn and Shadow Court. E4's crew advanced a preconnect line into the residence and E3 arrived and pulled a second preconnect line. L2 was directed to position at the rear of E4 and assist with a search of the residence, as well as place ground ladders to the residence. Engine 41- 6 arrived and assisted the interior crews and E54-5 was assigned as the RIT. E2 arrived and their crew was instructed to stage for manpower pull. The crews quickly extinguished the fire and overhaul was completed. City Fire Marshals, FM-1 and FM-2, were notified and responded to the scene. 01/10/2011 30046 2011-000024 10:40 4568 S DUPONT HWY Cover assignment, standby, moveup Assist station 41 with a reported bldg fire at the Texas Roadhouse. 01/11/2011 30046 2011-000025 13:47 101 BABB DR Good intent call, other Dispatched for an odor investigation. RP relates to "not feeling well" when he gets up in the morning and would like his apartment to be checked for a possible CO leak. Upon arrival, the RP was in the ground floor lobby being attended to by EMS. Crews went to the RP's apartment and found no hazards. Multi-gas detector readings were all normal. EMS obtained a pt refusal and the RP was not transported. RP was informed there were no hazardous conditions in his apartment. Cleared the scene. 01/12/2011 30046 2011-000026 04:33 1407 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other System malfunction nothing was found after a complete walk through. 01/12/2011 30046 2011-000027 04:33 1080 SILVER LAKE BLVD Good intent call, other E4 and Ladder 2 responded to an automatic alarm at the above address, Capt. Hall established command and crews from E4 and Ladder 2 were sent to investigate the problem. Upon investigation crews found steam from a pot in the kitchen area had set off the smoke detector m1-21. Capt. Hall placed the scene under control and turned the building back over to the night staff. Units cleared. 01/13/2011 30046 2011-000028 03:24 631 MAPLE PARKWAY Building fire The Dover Fire Department responded to the above address in reference to a building fire. On arrival, E4 officer (15) reported a one story residential with fire showing. E4's crew (Rhoades/LeCompte) advanced a preconnect line into the residence for fire supression. E3 arrived and E3's crew (Reeder/Nitsch) advananced a second preconnect line into the residence to assist with fire supression. E2 and E54- 5 arrived on location and conducted primary and secondary searches. Rescue 43-6 arrived and set up for RIT operations. L2 arrived and staged. Crews encountered fire condition on the first floor and the basement area but same was quickly extinguished. Overhaul was completed and the scene was turned over to the City of Dover Fire Mardhal's office. A63 and KM5 remained on scene until being released by command. 01/13/2011 30046 2011-000029 11:31 1203 WALKER RD Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire confined Arrived on location maintenance personnel met firefighters at the front door and stated their was a heater malfunction on unit 3. Maintenance secured the power to the unit prior to FD arrival. Crew checked same. No further action taken by FD. 01/13/2011 30046 2011-000030 15:36 110 S NEW ST Cooking fire, confined to container E4 responded to the above address for report of an automatic fire alarm. While enroute dispatched advised it was poss unattended cooking. E4 arrived and crews found it to be under control due to unattended cooking. The alarm was reset by HOP maintenance prior to our arrival. Unit cleared and returned to quarters. 01/14/2011 30046 2011-000031 11:01 1886 LYNNBURY WOODS RD Dispatched & canceled en route CALLED TO ASSIST STA.43 ON A BUILDING FIRE. UNITS CANCELLED EN ROUTE 01/14/2011 30046 2011-000032 11:53 41 Shinnecock rd False alarm or false call, other STEAM FROM A CLOTHES IORN SET OFF THE 2ND FLOOR SMOKE DETECTOR 01/14/2011 30046 2011-000033 14:43 1200 N DUPONT HWY False alarm or false call, other Unattended cooking third floor 01/14/2011 30046 2011-000034 17:29 1289 WALKER RD BUILD M Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) Gas leak inside resident Apt. of M22. Crew from E3 investigated to find the pilot light on the stove was the issue. The gas and the electric was secured to the stove as well as the hot water heater. Chesapeake was requested to respond to the scene. Scene was placed under control and all units returned. 01/14/2011 30046 2011-000035 22:25 41 GREENTREE DR Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional Workers cleaning the floors with a floor buffer accidentally set the alarm off. 01/15/2011 30046 2011-000036 13:37 32 W LOOCKERMAN ST Water problem, other Dispatch to a water flow investigation. On scene E4 and L2 crews determined it was a overfilled bath tube by a resident on second floor with water leaking to the first floor. The apt residents secured the water. Units returned prior to maintenance arriving on the scene. 01/15/2011 30046 2011-000037 14:22 1200 N DUPONT HWY Cooking fire, confined to container Dispatched to a AFA at the above location. While en route, was advised that DSU Security relates unattended cooking on the 2nd floor. Upon arrival, crews investigated and found unattended cooking in the 4th floor day room. Situation under control, no need for mechanical ventilation. 01/16/2011 30046 2011-000038 05:00 684 FOREST ST Cooking fire, confined to container Dispatched to an AFA at the above location. Upon arrival, crews investigated and found unattended cooking within the structure. No need for mechanical ventilation, cleared the scene. Date: 02/28/2011 Page: 2 Time:10:48

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type 01/16/2011 30046 2011-000039 14:45 644 KENTLAND AVE Vicinity alarm (incident in other location) Smoke detectors activated by unknown reasons throughout the house. Made forcible entry to the rear door of the residence, with negative findings. Secured door and notified DSP. 01/16/2011 30046 2011-000040 15:17 1005 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional Dispatched to Tony's Bella Villa Pizza 1053 N Dupont Hwy for water flow alarm. Alarm activation was due to hydrant # 721 being broken off due to an MVC. No alarm panel in business, an audible alarm could be heard form a locked utility room on side C two doors down from 1053. Occupant contacted bldg to reset alarm. 01/16/2011 30046 2011-000041 21:33 19 SHINNECOCK RD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction The Dover FIre Department responded to 19 Shinnecock Road in reference to a alarm at that residence. On arrival crews from E4 and E3 checked the residence but had negative results. The homeowner was advised to contact their alarm company to have the system cjecked. No further action taken. 01/17/2011 30046 2011-000042 19:34 1300 S FARMVIEW DR C Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke REPORTED AS SMOKE COMING FROM 1ST FLOOR O BUILDING C. UPON INVESTIGATION, FOUND OUT THAT SOMEONE HAD DISCHARGED A DRY CHEMICAL IN HALLWAY. 01/18/2011 30046 2011-000043 07:42 136 GREENTREE DR System malfunction, other RESPONDED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS FOR A REPORT OF AN AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM ACTIVATION. AN INVESTIGATION FOUND A MALFUNCTION WITH THE SPRINKLER TAMPER VALVES. NO FIRE CONDITION WAS FOUND. 01/18/2011 30046 2011-000044 10:34 299 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional RESPONDED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS FOR A REPORT OF AN AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM ACTIVATION. AN INVESTIGATION FOUND A TRASH CAN WAS PUSHED INTO A FIRE PULL-STATION, CAUSING THE ACTIVATION. NO FIRE CONDITION WAS FOUND. 01/18/2011 30046 2011-000045 19:56 1365 N DUPONT HWY 3000 Malicious, mischievous false call, other E4 and Rescue 54 responded to the above address for report of a automatic fire alarm. Units responded from Silver Lake due to Ice Rescue Training. While enroute units were updated that it was a pull station activation near the Boscovs entrance . Crew from E4 advised that it was a pull station near the door and the situation was under control. Scene was turned over to Mall Security. Units cleared. 01/19/2011 30046 2011-000046 17:20 E LEBANON RD Good intent call, other Engine 7 was disaptched for a vehicle fire on West bound lane of East Lebanon Road. On arrival found a Jeep Cherokee over heating on the shoulder of the roadway. No further action by DFD. 01/20/2011 30046 2011-000047 19:00 60 THE PLAZA Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional Responded to the above address in reference to an alarm sounding. On arrival, crews were met by building maintenance who advised the system was malfunctioning. No further action taken. 01/20/2011 30046 2011-000048 23:43 260 N GOVERNORS BLVD Carbon monoxide incident The Dover Fire Department responded to 260 N Govs Blvd in reference to a possible gas leak inside the residence. On arrival, E4's crew located a gas generator that had been running inside the residence. Investigation rvealed the residence had electric shut off earlier in the day and the resident was using the generator as the power source. Two occupants of the residence were transported to Kent General for evaluation by A63. A positive pressure fan was utilized to remove the fumes from the residence. No further action taken. 01/21/2011 30046 2011-000049 09:42 30 Loockerman plaza Good intent call, other DFD was dispatched to an AFA at 30 Loockerman Plaza. Occupant called back and stated they were performing Dry wall work on the second floor and forgot to call in and put the system on test. I cancelled the alarm and continued in to confirm same. No further Action by DFD. 01/22/2011 30046 2011-000050 08:49 110 S NEW ST Unintentional transmission of alarm, other SAWDUST SET OFF ALARM. 01/22/2011 30046 2011-000051 11:48 211 DELAWARE AVE False alarm or false call, other The DOvedr FIre Department responded to Central Middle School in reference to an alarm sounding at that location. On arrival, E4's crew completed a walk through and located anti-freeze leaking onto a detector in the female's locker room. Maintenance was on scene and made aware of the situation and the scene was subsequently turned over to building maintenance. No further actioin taken. 01/22/2011 30046 2011-000052 19:38 51 SAULSBURY ROAD Good intent call, other Crews from 41, 43, 51 and 54 responded to the above address in reference to an unknown problem. On arrival, crew located the refrigerator had a problem that was making a rumbling noise. No further action taken. 01/22/2011 30046 2011-000053 20:37 183 WILLIS RD Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other Crews responded to the above address in refence to an electrical problem. The crews located a outlet that had taken a power surge. The power was secured to the affected area. No further action taken. 01/23/2011 30046 2011-000054 01:31 18 GREENHILL AVE False alarm or false call, other Crews reponded to the above addres in refence to an alarm sounding. Crews checked the building but met with negative results. No further action taken. 01/23/2011 30046 2011-000055 17:46 133 ROOSEVELT AVE Building fire The Dover Fire Department responded to 133 Roosevelt Ave in reference to a building fire with person(s) possibly reported trapped. E4 arrived and found smoke showing from a two and a half story residence. E4 officer (15-Fortney) assumed command and E4's crew advanced a single preconnect line to the rear of the residence for fire supression. Ladder 2 arrived and performed venitlation on the first floor. The fire was contained to the kitchen area and was quickly extinguished. E6 and E3 arrived and staged. E54-5 and 41-3 were enroute but were instructed prior to their arrival. An occupant from the residence received minor burns to her right hand amd wrist area and her right shoulder area. The subject (Camilla Haywood) was transported to Bayhealth ER by A63. FM 2 repsonded to the scene and FM 1 responded to the hospital. The fire scene was placed under control and subquently turned over to FM 2. 01/24/2011 30046 2011-000056 17:53 51 WEBBS LA E Cooking fire, confined to container E4, E3,E2, ALL RESPONDED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS FOR REPORT OF SMOKE IN THE BUILDING. E4 ARRIVED AND CREWS INVESTIGATED SAME FINDING UNATTENDED COOKING IN THE BOTTOM FLOOR APARTMENT. SCENE WAS TURNED OVER TO MAINTENANCE FOR FURTHER. Date: 02/28/2011 Page: 3 Time:10:48

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type 01/24/2011 30046 2011-000057 18:08 480 COUNTRY DR Cooking fire, confined to container Unattended cooking Apt J, no need for Mech. ventilation. 01/24/2011 30046 2011-000058 18:32 410 FEDERAL ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction ALARM MALFUNCTION. 01/24/2011 30046 2011-000059 23:00 904 WHATCOAT DR Local alarm system, malicious false alarm Fire Alarm pull station on 2nd floor hallway pulled. No fire or smoke found. 01/25/2011 30046 2011-000060 06:44 NAULT RD Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle Dispatched to MVC subject trapped, in route was notify that patient self extricated from the vehicle. Assignment was reduced to E-2. On arrival confirmed an MVC, single vehicle rolled over in the roadway. DSP and A63 where on location prior to our arrival. A-63 had one patient refusal. E-2 crew disconnected the car's battery. Scene turned over to DSP. 01/25/2011 30046 2011-000061 12:03 10 FAIRWAY LAKES DR B Cooking fire, confined to container Unattended cooking Apt. B13. Alarm was reset prior to arrival dispatch notified FM. 01/27/2011 30046 2011-000062 09:30 110 S NEW ST Cooking fire, confined to container E4 MADE A RESPONSE AND WHILE RESPONDING WERE ADVISED THAT IT WAS UNATTENDED COOKING. CREWS INVESTIGATED SAME AND FOUND UNATTENDED COOKING ON THE SECOND FLOOR . SCENE WAS TURNED OVER TO FM-2 FOR FURTHER. 01/27/2011 30046 2011-000063 12:38 910 WHATCOAT DR Smoke or odor removal WRITER RESPONED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS FOR REPORT OF THE FIRE ALARM GOING OFF DUE TO SUBJECTS SMOKING MARIJUANA. DOVER POLICE WAS ALSO NOTIFIED. WRITER AND DOVER PD ARRIVED ON SCENE AND INVESTIGATED FINDING NOTHING BUT CIGARETTES IN THE THIRD FLOOR HALLWAY. ALARM WAS SOUNDING AND MAINTENANCE WAS NOTIFIED. ALL UNITS CLEARED. 01/27/2011 30046 2011-000064 18:57 246 CAMEO CT Good intent call, other WRITER RESPONDED TO ABOVE LOCATION AND FOUND THAT THE ALARM WAS SOUNDING INSIDE THE TRAILER. AFTER INVESTIGATING NO ANSWER COULD BE OBTAINED AT EITHER DOOR OF THE RESIDENCE AND THE OWNERS VEHICLE WAS IN THE DRIVEWAY. AFTER SPEAKING WITH NEIGHBORS WRITER LEARNED THAT THE RESIDENT IS AN ALCHOHOLIC AND IS A MENTAL PATIENT AS WELL. WRITER HAD E-3 MAKE A RESPONSE AS WELL AS DOVER PD DUE TO FORCING ENTRY . E3'S CREW WAS ABLE TO OBTAIN ACCESS TO A WINDOW AND FOUND THE RESIDENT PASSED OUT INTOXICATED IN HER BEDROOM. AFTER A BRIEF NEGOTIATION THE RESIDENT FINALLY ALLOWED ACCESS TO THE RESIDENCE. NO CO WAS FOUND BY THE INVESTIGATING CREWS. ALL UNITS CLEARED. 01/27/2011 30046 2011-000065 19:02 446 COUNTRY DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional Dispatched for Smoke Detector activation. Div 1 smoke dect. activated in Bldg 438, due to water leaking. possibility from roof. Fire Alarm was silenced but not reset, bldg turned over to Scott from maintenance and He was advised Bldg placed on FIRE WATCH until Alarm system is placed back in service. 01/28/2011 30046 2011-000066 17:19 338 KENTLAND AVE Cooking fire, confined to container Dispatched to an AFA at a residence. While en route, dispatch advised they received a call back from the alarm company wishing to canx due to unattended cooking. Held response to a single engine. Upon arrival, crews investigated and found burnt chicken. No extension or need for mechanical ventilation. Under control and returned to qtrs 01/28/2011 30046 2011-000067 22:41 1200 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional Dispatched for fire alarm activation, no contact from DSU security. Upon arrival DSU security were out in front of Bldg. They indicated they had checked the bldg with negative results. Alarm panel indicated zone 5, second floor. E-4 crew checked second floor no activation noted. bluiding turned over to DSU security. 01/29/2011 30046 2011-000068 08:46 251 NORTHDOWN DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction Smoke detector activation third floor master bedroom. Made forcible entry front after checking all windows and other doors. Dispatch was given to two numbers to call no answers on both. 01/29/2011 30046 2011-000069 23:44 272 N DUPONT HWY No incident found on arrival at dispatch address Units were held in station per Dover 15. DPD was on scene advising no fire. 01/30/2011 30046 2011-000070 13:05 2030 GENERALS WAY B Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional Dispatched for automatic fire alarm. upon investigation e-4 crew found occupant in B306 had been cooking bacon and it created smoke when they opened their door the smoke defector activated. 01/31/2011 30046 2011-000071 12:21 1245 N DUPONT HWY Cooking fire, confined to container Engine 6 made a response to 1245 N. DuPont Hwy, Quiznos for burning odor in the burning. On arrival Engine 6's crew found an electrical odor and a slight haze in the rear of the store. Crew investigated and found the Tea maker ahd shorted out and electrical components burned within the unit. Crews unplugged and removed same. Engine 6 cleared. 01/31/2011 30046 2011-000072 21:13 950 WHATCOAT DR Cooking fire, confined to container Unattended cooking, fire extinguished prior to our arrival. Dispatch notified property manager to reset alarm. Total Incidents: 72

FY 10-11 City Funded Account Balance Sheet ACCOUNT BUDGET SPENT BALANCE Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance $ 60,500.00 $ 49,766.90 $ 10,733.10 Gasoline $ 21,000.00 $ 8,710.96 $ 12,289.04 Medical Supplies $ 700.00 $ 700.00 Other Equipment Repairs $ 4,000.00 $ 714.00 $ 3,286.00 Program Expenses $ 34,630.00 $ 11,970.65 $ 22,659.35 Radio Repairs $ 2,000.00 $ 802.62 $ 1,197.38 Safety & Security $ 3,150.00 $ 506.76 $ 2,643.24 Small Tools $ 4,800.00 $ 1,953.26 $ 2,846.74 Uniforms & Firefighting Gear $ 26,100.00 $ 11,768.56 $ 14,331.44 Building Expenses- Electricity $ 53,820.00 $ 29,600.94 $ 24,219.06 Building Maintenance Supplies $ 1,950.00 $ 1,089.98 $ 860.02 Heating Expenses- Gas $ 20,000.00 $ 5,360.82 $ 14,639.18 Telephone $ 19,340.00 $ 9,052.01 $ 10,287.99 Water & Sewer $ 2,150.00 $ 2,005.14 $ 144.86 Contractual Services $ 16,587.00 $ 16,587.00 Training & Travel $ 8,365.00 $ 5,371.00 $ 2,994.00 Pension $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 Office Supplies $ 2,200.00 $788.61 $ 1,411.39 Balance as of: 01/31/11

City of Dover Capital Investment Plan Project Tracking Report January 31, 2011 Points to Remember - * Original Project Budget = Original Total Project Budget initially included in approved annual budget. * Latest Project Budget = Revised Total Project Budget included in most recent approved annual budget or one of the following: bond resolution, revolving fund loan agreement, Council approved budget amendment, or City Manager approved amendment as per the Budget Amendment Procedure. * Current Fiscal Year - Revised Fiscal Year Budget = Current Year approved project budgets plus carry forward balances of unspent budgets in the prior fiscal year. Project Carry Forward balances will be submitted to City Council for amendment in January 2010. Can also be amended with City Manager approval per the Budget Amendment Procedure. * Water Quality, Inflow/Infiltration, Distribution Upgrades and New Development projects are budgeted as a blanket project and once individual projects are identified and estimated they are created using an allocation of the overall budgeted amount. * Status and Comments provided by City Manager. * For Finance purposes projects are considered completed when placed in service and all charges have been processed. Community Water & Total Current Year Budget Funding Sources General Transportation Wastewater Electric CIP Budget Balance $ 113,156 $ - $ - $ - $ 113,156 Project Carry Forward Balances 88,083 - 953,238 850,736 2 729 ,729,628 Federal and/or State Grants 4,270,348 1,000,000 45,248 135,152 5,450,748 New Revolving Fund Loans - - 863,060 - 863,060 Carry Forward Construction Loan Balances - - 8,001,973 254,757 8,256,730 Bond Proceeds - - - 415,585 415,585 Impact Fees - - 758,821 - 758,821 Income from Sale of Assets - - - - - Parkland Reserve 36,872 - - - 36,872 Library Reserve & Contributions 3,363,732 - - 3,363,732 Transfer from Operating Funds 1,019,629 300,000 58,709 2,797,792 4,176,130 Interest Earned 10,900 - - 40,700 51,600 Total Funding Sources (Unaudited) $ 8,902,720 $ 1,300,000 $ 10,681,049 $ 4,494,722 $ 26,216,062 Page 1 of 5

City of Dover General Fund - Major CIP Projects January, 2011 Hide TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project Current Revised Fiscal Project Project Project To Date Budget % Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD % Budget Code Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY2009 Bid Pack A - constuction started / Bid 2 LB0901 M/G New Library Project $ 18,200,000 $ 24,679,934 $ 1,356,957 $ 23,322,977 5.5% $ 6,687,039 $ 7,630,663 $ 619,891 8.1% Started Pack B - bidding started. 3 Totals - FY09 $ 18,200,000 $ 24,679,934 $ 1,356,957 $ 23,322,977 5.5% $ 6,687,039 $ 7,630,663 $ 619,891 8.1% 4 5 FY2010 6 PR1001 Pitts Center Addition 50,000 40,000 28,629 11,371 71.6% - 36,872 25,501 69.2% Complete Complete. 7 Totals - FY10 $ 50,000 $ 40,000 $ 28,629 $ 11,371 71.6% $ - $ 36,872 $ 25,501 69.2% 8 9 FY2011 10 Vehicles & Equipment $ 63,675 $ 63,675 $ 461,333 $ (397,658) 724.5% $ 735,185 $ 735,185 $ 461,333 62.8% Started Vehicles being ordered. Core Law Enforcement Server 11 PD1001 Replacement - 53,500 30,108 23,392 56.3% - 53,500 30,108 56.3% Started Specifications done. 12 PD1101 Public Assembly Room Upgrade - 20,000 - 20,000 0.0% - 20,000 - 0.0% 13 PR1101 Playground Improv Program - 15,000 12,952 2,048 86.3% 15,000 15,000 12,952 86.3% Complete BB Courts paved. 14 PR1102 Skate Park - 30,000 - 30,000 0.0% 30,000 30,000 - 0.0% Not Started In discussions with equipment provider. 15 ST1101 Concrete Program 50,000 50,000 45,759 4,241 91.5% 50,000 50,000 45,759 91.5% Started Complete with contractor portion. 16 ST1102 Transfer to CT Fund 300,000 300,000 300,000 - 0.0% 300,000 300,000 300,000 100.0% Started Transfer to Com Transp Fund - December. 17 MR1101 Downtown Security Cameras 31,500 31,500 - 31,500 0.0% 31,500 31,500 - 0.0% Started Contract signed. 18 Totals - FY11 $ 445,175 $ 563,675 $ 850,152 $ (286,477) 150.8% $ 1,161,685 $ 1,235,185 $ 850,152 68.8% 19 20 Grand Totals $ 18,695,175 $ 25,283,609 $ 2,235,738 $ 23,047,871 8.8% $ 7,848,724 $ 8,902,720 $ 1,495,544 16.8% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is rebudgeted to start over each fiscal year. G = Grant funded project Page 2 of 5

City of Dover Community Transportation & General Fund Street Funds - Major CIP Projects January, 2011 Hide TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project Current Revised Fiscal Project Project Project To Date Budget % Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD % Budget Code Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY 2006 2 TE0601 M Lincoln Park Center $ 400,000 $ 479,148 $ 431,076 $ 48,072 90.0% $ 121,891 $ 121,891 $ 73,819 60.6% Started Ongoing. 3 Totals $ 400,000 $ 479,148 $ 431,076 $ 48,072 90.0% $ 121,891 $ 121,891 $ 73,819 60.6% 4 5 FY 2007 6 E. Water Street Brick $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - $ 65,000 0.0% $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - 0.0% Specialty contract needed. 7 Totals $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - $ 65,000 0.0% $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - 0.0% 8 9 FY 2009 Trying to move this to Library Project if 10 Schutte Parking Lot $ 21,950 $ 21,950 $ - $ 21,950 0.0% $ 21,950 $ 21,950 $ - 0.0% State approves. 11 Turnberry Drive 40,000 40,000 40,000 - 100.0% 40,000 40,000 40,000 100.0% Curb work complete, paving in process. 12 Totals $ 61,950 $ 61,950 $ 40,000 $ 21,950 64.6% $ 61,950 $ 61,950 $ 40,000 64.6% 13 14 FY 2011 15 CT1051 Washington Street $ 104,000 $ 104,000 $ 104,000 $ - 100.0% $ 104,000 $ 104,000 $ 104,000 100.0% Complete. 16 CT1108 Mitschner Road (incl. CDBG) 169,066 169,066 246,672 (77,606) 145.9% 169,066 169,066 246,672 145.9% In progress. 17 CT1086 Delaware Ave 6,250 6,250 6,250 - 100.0% 6,250 6,250 6,250 100.0% Complete. 18 CT1118 Oak Road Signage 11,875 11,875 10,375 1,500 87.4% 11,875 11,875 10,375 87.4% Just received. 19 CT1142 Governor's Ave. Rebuild 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 0.0% 1,000 1,000 - 0.0% 20 CT1161 Towne Point 7,500 7,500 - 7,500 0.0% 7,500 7,500 - 0.0% CT1162 Library Access Rd. 105,000 105,000 - 105,000 0.0% 105,000 105,000 - 0.0% 21 ST1101 Street & Alley Program 300,000 300,000 175,926 124,074 58.6% 300,000 300,000 175,926 58.6% In progress. 22 State Agreements not yet rec'd 458,968 346,468 - 346,468 0.0% 346,468 346,468 - 0.0% Agreements have not been received. 23 Totals $ 1,163,659 $ 1,051,159 $ 543,224 $ 507,935 51.7% $ 1,051,159 $ 1,051,159 $ 543,224 51.7% 24 25 Grand Totals $ 1,690,609 $ 1,657,257 $ 1,014,299 $ 642,958 61.2% $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 657,043 50.5% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is rebudgeted to start over each fiscal year. Page 3 of 5

City of Dover Water/Wastewater Improvement & Extension Fund - Major CIP Projects January, 2011 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project % Approved Revised Fiscal % Project Project Project To Date Budget Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD Budget Code Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY 2008 2 WD0807 South Governors Ave. Water Main Upgrade $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 2,664 $ 197,336 1.3% $ - $ 197,336 $ - 0.0% Complete Done. 3 WD0804 M 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tower 4,196,600 2,590,000 11,062 2,578,938 0.4% - 193,377 4,439 2.3% Started Selecting Tank Model & Site; FY11 = Constr. 4 WD0805 M Piney Point Well 398,800 665,000 61,414 603,586 9.2% - 162,525 8,939 5.5% Started DNREC permiting; FY11 = Constr. 5 WW0809 M South Governors Ave. Sewer Main 300,000 291,000 13,561 277,439 4.7% - 279,244 1,805 0.6% Complete Done. 6 WW0810 M/SL US 13 East Sanitary Sewer Interceptor 2,376,800 3,409,641 2,443,587 966,054 71.7% - 2,335,862 1,575,426 67.4% Complete Functionally completed, some minor site restoration. 7 Totals - FY08 $ 7,472,200 $ 7,155,641 $ 2,532,288 $ 4,623,353 35.4% $ - $ 3,168,344 $ 1,590,608 50.2% 8 9 FY2009 10 WQ0905 M/SL Bayard Avenue $ 590,910 $ 590,910 $ 237,336 $ 353,574 40.2% $ - $ 584,420 $ 230,846 39.5% Started Starting construction in March. 11 WQ0906 M/SL East side N. State Street 868,707 877,596 177,178 700,418 20.2% - 847,700 148,175 17.5% Done Done. 12 WQ0907 M/SL Route 13 Water Main 1,058,700 1,035,898 142,748 893,150 13.8% - 967,801 18,752 1.9% Started Going to bid. 13 R Water Quality Improvements FY09 $ 2,518,317 $ 2,504,404 $ 557,262 $ 1,947,142 22.3% $ - $ 2,399,921 $ 397,773 58.9% Started 14 15 WW0902 M/SL DE State University Pumping Station Repl. $ 386,400 $ 386,400 $ 293,367 $ 93,033 75.9% - 240,324 147,652 61.4% Completed Done. Done. Overage covered by US 13 Interceptor 16 WW0905 M/SL Fox Hall/Retreat Force Main Rerouting 133,100 139,245 238,789 (99,544) 171.5% - - 20,351 0.0% Completed (WW0810). 17 WW0907 M/SL Acorn Lane Pump Station Replace. 386,400 386,400 293,904 92,496 76.1% - 210,528 118,393 56.2% Completed Done. 18 Totals - FY09 $ 3,424,217 $ 3,416,449 $ 1,383,322 $ 2,033,127 40.5% $ - $ 2,850,773 $ 684,169 24.0% 19 20 FY2010 21 WD1002 R Remote Control & Monitor Wells $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 23,104 $ 31,896 42.0% $ - $ 31,896 $ - 0.0% Started Material ordered. 22 WW1001 M/SL Inflow/Infiltration Removal 1,800,000 1,799,668 6,369 1,793,299 0.4% - 1,798,447 5,148 0.3% Started Construction to start in April. 23 WW1007 M Fox Hall Pump Station 427,900 52,000 43,077 8,923 82.8% 375,900 426,044 41,221 9.7% Started Going out to bid. 24 WW1008 M Heatherfield Force Main Rerouting 220,400 40,000 35,175 4,825 87.9% 229,200 267,916 33,891 12.6% Started Going out to bid. 25 WW1010 I Tar Ditch Interceptor Upgrade 518,230 518,230 12,487 505,744 2.4% - 516,781 11,038 2.1% Started Reviewing design. 26 WS1001 Various Pump Motor Replacements 45,248 45,248 - 45,248 0.0% - 45,248 - 0.0% Started Grant approved. Ordering begun. 27 Totals - FY10 $ 3,066,778 $ 2,510,146 $ 120,212 $ 2,389,934 4.8% $ 605,100 $ 3,086,332 $ 91,298 3.0% 28 29 FY2011 30 WD1101 Misc. Distribution System Upgrade $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 60,000 0.0% $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - 0.0% Started On-going as needed. 31 WD1102 Wellhead Redevelopement Program 60,000 60,000 - 60,000 0.0% 60,000 60,000 - 0.0% Started Work starting in March\April. 32 WQ1101 Water Quality Improvements 500,000 500,000 - 500,000 0.0% 500,000 500,000 26,448 5.3% Not Started See above FY09. 33 WW1101 M/SL Inflow/Infiltration Removal 500,000 500,000 - 500,000 0.0% 500,000 500,000 - 0.0% Started Will start after FY10 is done. 34 WW1102 R Scada Technology Equip Upgrade 82,100 82,100 62,913 19,187 76.6% 82,100 82,100 62,913 76.6% Started 2 of 7 installed. 35 WW1103 Del State/Del Tech Force Main Rerouting 286,500 286,500 3,801 282,699 1.3% 286,500 286,500 3,801 1.3% Done Shifted completion to interceptor (WW0810). 36 WW1104 Lepore Road Pump Station Replacement 52,000 52,000 7,700 44,300 14.8% 52,000 52,000 7,700 14.8% Started Design with Braun.. 37 WW1105 R Misc. Sewer System Improvements 35,000 35,000 35,152 (152) 100.4% 35,000 35,000 35,152 100.4% Started Ongoing as needed. 38 Totals - FY11 $ 1,575,600 $ 1,575,600 $ 109,567 $ 1,466,034 7.0% $ 1,575,600 $ 1,575,600 $ 136,014 8.6% 39 40 Grand Totals $ 15,538,795 $ 14,657,836 $ 4,145,388 $ 10,512,448 28.3% $ 2,180,700 $ 10,681,049 $ 2,502,090 23.4% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is rebudgeted to start over each fiscal year. SL = State Loan Project - construction phase is financed I = Impact Fee Financed Project Page 4 of 5

City of Dover Electric Improvement & Extension Fund - Major CIP Projects January, 2011 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Hide Original Latest Project Project % Current Revised Fiscal % Project Project Project To Date Budget Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD Budget Code Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY 2006 2 EE0601 M/B 69 KV feeders 3 and 4 $ 11,060,000 $ 8,693,782 $ 8,761,762 $ (67,980) 100.8% $ - $ 4,242 $ 4,242 100.0% Completed In service. 3 EE0603 M/S Governor's Avenue Rebuild 1,268,450 2,068,260 550,725 1,517,535 26.6% - 250,000 30,264 12.1% Completed Done. 4 Totals - FY06 $ 12,328,450 $ 10,762,042 $ 9,312,486 $ 1,449,556 86.5% $ - $ 254,242 $ 34,506 13.6% 5 6 FY 2008 7 EG0801 Unit 3 Turb Bearing Fire Protect Deluge $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 44,720 $ 5,280 89.4% $ - $ 50,000 $ 44,720 89.4% Completed Final training needed. 8 Totals - FY08 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 44,720 $ 5,280 89.4% $ - $ 50,000 $ 44,720 89.4% 9 10 FY2010 11 EG1001 B Vansant CT Mark IV Control (Replmnt) $ 700,000 $ 610,000 $ 438,687 $ 171,313 71.9% $ - $ 152,050 $ 152,050 100.0% Completed In service. 12 EG1002 B McKee Run Entrance Road 240,000 240,000 154,722 85,278 64.5% - 154,244 154,244 100.0% Completed In service. 13 EG1005 Work Mgmt. System Replacement 85,000 85,000 26,577 58,423 31.3% - - 9,859 0.0% Completed Done. 14 EG1009 Photovoltaic Install @ McKee Run - - 65,065 (65,065) 0.0% - 65,065 65,065 100.0% Completed In service. 15 EE1005 M/B Mid City Substation 1,488,461 993,711 975,819 17,892 98.2% - 1,087 1,087 100.0% Completed In service. 16 EE1009 S LED Lighting Replacement 70,087 70,087 70,010 77 99.9% - 70,087 70,010 99.9% Completed Installed on Division. 17 EU1002 B Crossgates 396,904 543,075 524,391 18,684 96.6% - 1,441 1,440 100.0% Completed Done. Done. This project is over budget due to having addtiional bond 18 EU1003 B Buchanan Acres 406,000 865,144 1,207,967 (342,823) 139.6% - 129,502 129,502 100.0% Completed proceeds to spend. 19 20 Totals - FY10 $ 3,386,452 $ 3,407,017 $ 3,463,238 $ (56,221) 101.7% $ - $ 573,476 $ 583,257 101.7% 21 22 FY2011 23 --- V hi ehicles & E i quipment $ 1 8 58,200 $ 1 8 58,200 $ 113,437 $ 44,763 1 71.7% $ 1 8 58,200 $ 1 8 58,200 $ 113,437 71.7% 1 Started V hi echicles being d ordered. 24 EE1101 Substation PT & CT Replacement 256,218 256,218 179,885 76,333 70.2% 256,218 256,218 179,885 70.2% Started Material being received. 25 EE1102 Replace of 69 kV Breakers 100,000 100,000 7,220 92,780 7.2% 100,000 100,000 7,220 7.2% Completed Installed. 26 EE1103 Lighting Rehabilitation 100,000 100,000 107,644 (7,644) 107.6% 100,000 100,000 107,644 107.6% Completed Foxhall done. 27 EE1104 Walker Road OH Conversion 350,511 350,511 - 350,511 0.0% 350,511 - - 0.0% Dropped Funds reappropriated. 28 EE1105 Engineering Misc Equipment Replmnt 40,000 40,000 24,751 15,249 61.9% 40,000 40,000 24,751 61.9% Started Ongoing as needed. 29 EE1106 Substation Batteries 24,500 24,500 23,489 1,011 95.9% 24,500 24,500 23,489 95.9% Completed Done. 30 EE1111 UG Transformers 120,536 120,536 68,867 51,669 57.1% 120,536 120,536 68,867 57.1% Started Ongoing as needed. 31 EE1111 UG Conductors 529,464 529,464 139,160 390,304 26.3% 529,464 529,464 139,160 26.3% Started Ongoing as needed. 32 EE1111 Meters 50,000 50,000 52,151 (2,151) 104.3% 50,000 50,000 52,151 104.3% Started Ongoing as needed. 33 EE1112 69kV Sub Switch Replacement - 180,000 - 180,000 0.0% - 180,000 - 0.0% 34 EG1101 Unit 3 Cooling Tower Fill 353,338 353,338 371,513 (18,175) 105.1% 353,338 398,338 371,513 93.3% Completed Done. 35 EG1102 Units 1 & 2 Cooling Tower 218,730 218,730 70,280 148,450 32.1% 218,730 173,730 70,280 40.5% Completed Done. 36 EG1103 Unit 3 Tubine Inspection 348,000 348,000 - 348,000 0.0% 348,000 - - 0.0% Started Scoping Cosntruciton in FY12 Funding reallocated to Unit 1 37 EG1104 Unit 3 Aux System Components 113,000 113,000 - 113,000 0.0% 113,000 - - 0.0% Deferred repair. Defered to FY12 . 38 EG1105 Plant Misc Equipment Replmnt 71,000 71,000 60,726 10,274 85.5% 71,000 71,000 60,726 85.5% Started Ongoing as needed. Funding reallocated Unit 1 repair. 39 EG1106 Unit 3 Stack Repairs 25,000 25,000 - 25,000 0.0% 25,000 - - 0.0% Deffered Defered to FY12. Scoping, some funding 40 EG1107 Units 1 & 2 Life Extension 276,000 276,000 23,601 252,399 8.6% 276,000 180,000 23,601 13.1% Started reallocated Unit 1 repair. Emergency repair; Budget 41 EG1108 Unit 1 Turbine Outage - - 424,747 (424,747) 0.0% - 412,000 424,747 103.1% Completed amendment approved in Dec. 42 EG1109 Unit 3 FD & ID FAN CNRL UP 45,000 45,000 - 45,000 0.0% 45,000 - - 0.0% Deferred Next fiscal year. 43 EG1110 Unit 3 DCS Com & Software 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 0.0% 30,000 - - 0.0% Deffered Next fiscal year. 44 EG1111 Unit 2 Boiler Inspection & Repair - 175,000 102,151 72,849 58.4% - 175,000 102,151 58.4% Completed Emergency repair. 45 EG1112 Unit 3 Heat Expansion Joint - 65,000 - 65,000 0.0% - 65,000 - 0.0% Not Started Scheduled Spring outage. 46 EG1113 Units 1 & 2 Control Modifications - 150,000 - 150,000 0.0% - 150,000 - 0.0% Not Started Scheduled Spring outage. 47 EG1114 Unit 3 Gas Line Modification - 60,000 - 60,000 0.0% - 60,000 - 0.0% Not Started Scheduled Spring outage. 48 EU1101 Distribution Upgrades 400,000 400,000 175,147 224,853 43.8% 400,000 373,018 175,147 47.0% Started Ongoing as needed. 49 $ 3,609,497 $ 4,239,497 $ 1,944,767 $ 2,294,730 45.9% $ 3,609,497 $ 3,617,004 $ 1,944,767 53.8% 50 51 Grand Totals $ 19,374,399 $ 18,458,556 $ 14,765,212 $ 3,693,344 80.0% $ 3,609,497 $ 4,494,722 $ 2,607,250 58.0% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is rebudgeted to start over each fiscal year. B = Bonded Project Page 5 of 5

City Assessor’s Office MEMO TO: Mayor & Council FROM: Cheryl A. Russell, AAS RE: Property Assessment Appeal Dates I request the following dates and times be established for the 2011 Property Assessment Appeals. May 31, 2011 – June 3, 2011 9:00 A.M. until 4:00 P.M. June 6, 2011 – June 10, 2011 9:00 A.M. until 4:00 P.M. * The hearing times are subject to change. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Assessor’s Office. *If Needed

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2011-06 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN 2 COUNCIL MET: 3 That Chapter 46 - Fire Prevention and Protection, Article I - In General, Section 46-5 - Open Burning, 4 be amended by inserting the text indicated in bold, blue, italics and deleting the text indicated in red 5 strikeout as follows: 6 Sec. 46-5. Open burning. 7 In residential multiple occupancy structures containing three or more dwelling units, 8 including but not limited to apartment houses, dormitories, roominghouses, and condominium 9 buildings, the open burning of any type shall be prohibited, except when permitted by the fire 10 marshal. The use of charcoal or gas-fired grills, burners, or cookers shall be prohibited on 11 balconies or within ten feet of the multiple occupancy structure. 12 (a) Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall 13 have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates 14 a different meaning: 15 Barbecuing - Commercial. The preparation and cooking of food by way of gas grill, 16 charcoal grill, or other apparatus used for the cooking of food by way of flame 17 produced through wood, charcoal, or gas for the purpose of cooking food for the sale 18 to and/or consumption by the general public. 19 Barbecuing - Recreational. The preparation and cooking of food by way of gas grill, 20 charcoal grill, or other apparatus used for the cooking of food by way of flame 21 produced through wood, charcoal, or gas for the purpose of cooking food for the 22 consumption by a family and/or guests or by the membership of a private organization 23 or church congregation. 24 Open Burning. The burning of materials wherein products of combustion are emitted 25 directly into the ambient air without passing through a stack or chimney from an 26 enclosed chamber. 27 Outdoor Fireplace. Any homemade or commercially produced fireplace, fire pit, or 28 fire ring used for the kindling of wood. 29 (b) Permit required. Open burning of structures, brush, or bonfires shall not be permitted 30 without a permit obtained from the Fire Marshal.

Proposed Ordinance #2011-06 - Ch 46, Art I, Sec 46-5 - Open Burning Page 2 31 (c) Fire dimensions. Open burning, when permitted, shall be kindled in such a manner 32 as not to be a danger to other campers, recreational vehicles, tents, or structures and shall not 33 be of a size greater than 18 inches by 18 inches by 18 inches. Height of the fire shall be 34 measured from the ground or from the bottom of the inside of the container being used to 35 kindle the fire. Open burning shall not be kindled directly on the ground unless contained in 36 a fire ring. 37 (d) Fire clearances and time restrictions. Outdoor fireplaces shall have 36 inches 38 clearance from all combustibles when in use. Portable fire places, fire pits, or fire 39 rings shall be extinguished in a residential area between the hours of 12:00 midnight 40 and 8:00 a.m. 41 (e) Commercial barbecuing. Commercial barbecuing shall be permitted under the 42 following conditions: 43 (1) The location has been approved by City of Dover Licensing and Inspections 44 and the Fire Marshal and an Outdoor Public Gathering Permit has been obtained. 45 (2) One (1) fire extinguisher of not less than five (5) lbs. (pounds) ABC is to be 46 located within ten (10) feet of the cooking area. Cooking area and cooking fuels shall 47 be secured from public access. 48 49 (3) Approval from the Board of Public Health has been obtained. 50 (4) The operator shall make all reasonable attempts to avoid causing a nuisance 51 to nearby property owners with smoke, fumes, or sparks. 52 (5) All compressed flammable gas containers used for cooking shall be secured in 53 such a way as to prevent them from being knocked, tipped, or blown over. 54 Any commercial barbecuing operations which are a continual nuisance because of 55 smoke, fumes, or sparks shall be terminated by the Code Official or Fire Marshal and the 56 Outdoor Public Gathering Permit revoked until such time as the Director of Licensing and 57 Inspections is satisfied that the problem has been corrected. 58 Barbecuing of any kind shall not be kindled within 200 feet of any fuel pump or 59 storage tank fill. Cooking grease shall not be disposed of by placing it directly on the ground 60 or in storm water drains. 61 (f) Prohibited - Multi-family residential dwelling units. In apartment buildings, 62 condominiums, or any other multi-family residential dwelling of three (3) or more units by 63 any other name, the storage of propane tanks inside units or on balconies is prohibited. 64 Recreational barbecuing shall be prohibited on any balcony or under any overhanging 65 portion or within 15 feet of any structure, except that the use of electrical ranges or electrical 66 grills shall be permitted. The use of outdoor fireplaces on balconies is prohibited.

Proposed Ordinance #2011-06 - Ch 46, Art I, Sec 46-5 - Open Burning Page 3 67 (g) Fines. Any owner, occupant, contractor, or body corporate found to be in violation 68 of this section shall be issued a summons as provided for in Appendix F--Fees and Fines. 69 (h) Authority of the Fire Marshal. The Fire Marshal is authorized to impose a ban on 70 open burning if weather conditions do not safely permit open burning. The Fire Marshal or 71 Fire Officer shall order any fire extinguished that is deemed unsafe or not in compliance with 72 Section 46-5 of the Dover Code. 73 ADOPTED: * 74 SYNOPSIS 75 To enhance the safety of commercial and recreational barbecuing and to control 76 and maintain the proper use of open burning. 77 Actions History 78 March 14, 2011 - Scheduled for First Reading 79 February 23, 2011 - Scheduled for Consideration by the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee 80 S:\ORDINANCES\2011\Draft\Ordinance 2011-06 - Ch 46, Art I, Sec 46-5 - Open Burning - 1st Reading.wpd

Memorandum Office of the City Manager PO Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Phone: (302) 736-7163 Fax: (302) 736-7002 E-mail: ttieman@dover.de.us To: Mayor and Council From: Terry Tieman Senior City Administrator Date: March 7, 2011 Subject: Fiscal 2010-2010 Latest Estimate - Updated Fund Summaries and Line Items Attached please find the updated Fund Summaries and Line Items that reflect the special Police funding of $40,000. Also included is the increased Power Cost Adjustment credit ($1.4 million), as recommended by the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee during their meeting on February 28, 2011. The changes indicated above are clearly marked on the attached pages. The first reading of the proposed budget ordinances, scheduled to take place on March 14, 2011 will also contain these changes. As always if you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Thank you. /hf \2010-2011 LE\Cover Memo_Latest Estimate Summary Changes-Police & PCA.docx 1

GENERAL FUND CASH RECEIPT SUMMARY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED RECEIPTS PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 2,277,575 $ 376,953 $ 1,034 $ 2,655,562 FINES AND POLICE REVENUE 536,502 ‐ 42,387 578,889 911 FEE 45,000 ‐ 15,000 60,000 INVESTMENT INCOME 224,000 ‐ (108,000) 116,000 LIBRARY REVENUES 64,189 ‐ ‐ 64,189 KENT COUNTY BOOK REIMBURSEMENT 460,000 ‐ ‐ 460,000 BUSINESS LICENSES 1,523,675 ‐ ‐ 1,523,675 PERMITS AND OTHER LICENSES 934,000 ‐ (42,000) 892,000 DEMOLITION REVENUE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 54,250 ‐ 11,500 65,750 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 300,000 ‐ ‐ 300,000 PROPERTY TAXES 10,982,634 ‐ ‐ 10,982,634 BID REVENUE 52,692 ‐ ‐ 52,692 RECREATION REVENUE 141,500 ‐ ‐ 141,500 FRANCHISE FEE 486,000 ‐ 34,000 520,000 TRASH FEES 2,244,511 ‐ (194,511) 2,050,000 DSWA TRASH FEE REBATE 143,000 ‐ ‐ 143,000 RENT REVENUE ‐ GARRISON FARM 87,000 ‐ ‐ 87,000 COURT OF CHANCERY FEES 645,000 ‐ ‐ 645,000 RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 21,201,528 376,953 (240,590) 21,337,891 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS WATER/WASTEWATER 972,889 ‐ (14,631) 958,258 INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS ELECTRIC 3,374,945 ‐ (33,445) 3,341,500 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 4,347,834 ‐ (48,076) 4,299,758 GRANTS: POLICE RELATED 138,350 ‐ (58,350) 80,000 CAPITAL SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE 73,500 ‐ ‐ 73,500 POLICE PENSION GRANT 620,000 ‐ ‐ 620,000 RECREATION GRANTS ‐ ‐ 51,000 51,000 MISC GRANT REVENUE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT ‐ ‐ 188,061 188,061 SALE OF ASSETS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GRANTS SUBTOTAL 831,850 ‐ 180,711 1,012,561 TRANSFERS FROM: TRANSFER TAX 1,000,000 (350,000) 750,000 1,400,000 MUNICIPAL STREET AID 526,843 ‐ ‐ 526,843 CIVIL TRAFFIC PENALTIES 930,000 ‐ 70,000 1,000,000 WATER/WASTEWATER ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ELECTRIC 8,856,000 ‐ ‐ 8,856,000 PARKLAND RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ LIBRARY RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WORKER'S COMP FUND ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ CONTINGENCY FUND ‐ TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL 11,312,843 (350,000) 820,000 11,782,843 TOTALS $ 37,694,055 $ 26,953 $ 712,045 $ 38,433,053 2

GENERAL FUND EXPENSE SUMMARY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED DEPARTMENT EXPENSES: CITY CLERK $ 287,403 $ ‐ $ (3,035) $ 284,368 COUNCIL 130,769 ‐ ‐ 130,769 TAX ASSESSOR 197,249 ‐ 69,497 266,746 FIRE 709,862 ‐ (44,130) 665,732 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 1,055,557 ‐ (23,668) 1,031,889 LIBRARY 1,126,227 ‐ (46,711) 1,079,516 RECREATION 778,469 ‐ 38,157 816,626 LIFE SAFETY 501,835 ‐ 15,757 517,592 CODE INFORCEMENT 276,481 300 18,229 295,010 PLANNING 423,193 (300) ‐ 422,893 INSPECTIONS 494,807 ‐ 65,000 559,807 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 247,488 ‐ ‐ 247,488 POLICE 12,458,373 ‐ (182,750) 12,275,623 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 449,516 ‐ ‐ 449,516 STREETS 802,029 ‐ 13,530 815,559 SANITATION 2,347,344 ‐ (49,505) 2,297,839 CITY MANAGER 561,572 ‐ 17,943 579,515 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 748,214 ‐ (50,885) 697,329 FINANCE 827,169 ‐ (22,000) 805,169 PUBLIC SERVICES ‐ ADMINISTRATION 369,752 ‐ ‐ 369,752 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 990,757 ‐ (34,925) 955,832 CENTRAL SERVICES 669,977 ‐ (13,133) 656,844 FLEET MAINTENANCE 761,929 ‐ (30,297) 731,632 CUSTOMER SERVICES 869,404 ‐ 4,219 873,623 HUMAN RESOURCES 358,890 ‐ (12,500) 346,390 MAYOR 88,341 ‐ ‐ 88,341 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTALS 28,532,607 ‐ (271,207) 28,261,400 OTHER EXPENSES: DEBT SERVICE 331,800 ‐ ‐ 331,800 TRANSFER TO CONTINGENCY ‐ ‐ 172,061 172,061 DSWA RECYCLING PROGRAM ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ INSURANCE 600,000 ‐ ‐ 600,000 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 1,297,509 ‐ ‐ 1,297,509 RETIREES PAYMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 995,000 ‐ ‐ 995,000 POLICE PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 95,000 ‐ ‐ 95,000 POLICE PENSION FUND 620,000 ‐ ‐ 620,000 OPEB ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ UNCOLLECTIBLES ‐ TRASH AND OTHER 10,000 ‐ 100,000 110,000 LOSS ON SALE OF ASSET ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STORM EMERGENCY ‐ ‐ ‐ STREET LIGHTS 985,000 ‐ ‐ 985,000 OTHER EXPENSE SUBTOTAL 4,934,309 ‐ 272,061 5,206,370 GRANTS IT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GRANTS SUBTOTAL ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFERS TRANSFER TO PENSION COLA ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND ‐ PROJECTS 1,307,839 ‐ ‐ 1,307,839 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND ‐ RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO STREET PROGRAM ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO PARKLAND/RECREATION RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO LIBRARY RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO CDBG FUND 6,000 ‐ ‐ 6,000 TRANSFER TO VERIZON RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ INVENTORY WRITE OFFS ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL 1,313,839 ‐ ‐ 1,313,839 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 2,913,300 26,953 711,191 3,651,444 TOTALS $ 37,694,055 $ 26,953 $ 712,045 $ 38,433,053 3

GENERAL CONTINGENCY FUND CASH RECEIPTS ESTIMATE/EXPENSE SUMMARY CASH RECEIPTS ESTIMATE INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED BEGINNING BALANCE $ 394,871 $ 135,522 $ ‐ $ 530,393 INTEREST EARNINGS 23,100 ‐ ‐ 23,100 REIMBURSEMENT FROM DEMA (SNOW EMERGENCY) ‐ ‐ 172,061 172,061 TOTALS $ 417,971 $ 135,522 $ 172,061 $ 725,554 EXPENSE SUMMARY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ TRANSFER TO OPEB ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO LIBRARY FUND ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 417,971 135,522 172,061 725,554 TOTALS $ 417,971 $ 135,522 $ 172,061 $ 725,554 4

GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND CASH RECEIPTS ESTIMATE INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED BEGINNING BALANCE ‐ PROJECTS $ 65,479 $ 162,113 $ ‐ $ 227,592 STATE GRANTS 3,343,520 888,828 ‐ 4,232,348 INTEREST EARNINGS 10,900 ‐ ‐ 10,900 INCOME FROM SALE OF ASSETS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ RECREATION GRANTS ‐ 34,583 ‐ 34,583 POLICE GRANTS 18,000 ‐ 20,000 38,000 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ LIBRARY BOND ISSUE/CONTRIBUTIONS 1,000,000 ‐ ‐ 1,000,000 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND FOR PROJECTS 1,307,839 ‐ ‐ 1,307,839 TRANSFER FROM PARKLAND RESERVE (JWP CNTR) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER FROM LIBRARY RESERVE 2,343,519 20,213 ‐ 2,363,732 GIFTS/DONATIONS (RECREATION) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PARKLAND RESERVE RECEIPT ‐ 36,872 ‐ 36,872 TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 140,000 (140,000) ‐ ‐ ‐ TOTALS $ 8,229,257 $ 1,002,609 $ 20,000 $ 9,251,866 EXPENSE SUMMARY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED DEPARTMENT EXPENSES: CITY CLERK $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ COUNCIL ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TAX ASSESSOR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ FIRE 288,210 (64,510) ‐ 223,700 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 63,675 ‐ (17,158) 46,517 LIBRARY 6,687,039 943,624 ‐ 7,630,663 RECREATION 45,000 36,872 ‐ 81,872 LIFE SAFETY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PLANNING ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ INSPECTIONS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ POLICE 282,380 53,500 7,648 343,528 STREETS 481,055 ‐ (26,579) 454,476 SANITATION 246,075 ‐ (33,656) 212,419 CITY MANAGER ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 12,000 ‐ (5,000) 7,000 FINANCE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PUBLIC SERVICES ‐ ADMINISTRATION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ CENTRAL SERVICES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ FLEET MAINTENANCE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ CUSTOMER SERVICES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ HUMAN RESOURCES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ MAYOR 31,500 ‐ ‐ 31,500 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTAL 8,136,934 969,486 (74,745) 9,031,675 TRANSFERS TRANSFER TO CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO PARKLAND RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO LIBRARY RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO COMMUNITY TRANS. FUND 318 ‐ ‐ 25,000 25,000 TRANSFER SUBTOTAL ‐ ‐ 25,000 25,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 92,323 33,123 69,745 195,191 TOTALS $ 8,229,257 $ 1,002,609 $ 20,000 $ 9,251,866 5

WATER/WASTEWATER FUND REVENUES INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED BASE REVENUE: PRIOR YEAR BALANCE ‐ WATER $ 943,545 $ 292,648 $ 353 $ 1,236,546 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE ‐ WASTEWATER 585,053 317,666 ‐ 902,719 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE ‐ KCSA (1,632,876) (239,205) (353) (1,872,434) WATER FEES 4,206,700 ‐ ‐ 4,206,700 WASTEWATER FEES 3,308,300 ‐ ‐ 3,308,300 WASTEWATER ADJUSTMENT FEES 4,275,600 ‐ ‐ 4,275,600 WATER TANK SPACE LEASING 299,400 ‐ ‐ 299,400 SEWER IMPACT FEES 323,000 ‐ ‐ 323,000 WATER IMPACT FEES 357,000 ‐ ‐ 357,000 INTEREST ‐ WATER 680 ‐ 8,206 8,886 INTEREST ‐ WASTEWATER 835 ‐ 10,079 10,914 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE 71,000 ‐ ‐ 71,000 REVENUE SUBTOTAL 12,738,237 371,109 18,285 13,127,631 GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS: STATE REIMBURSEMENT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GRANT REVENUE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS SUBTOTAL ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFERS FROM: TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER FROM CONTINGENCY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TOTALS $ 12,738,237 $ 371,109 $ 18,285 $ 13,127,631 6 ]

WATER/WASTEWATER FUND EXPENSE SUMMARY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED DIRECT EXPENSES: ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ 642,878 $ ‐ $ (70,548) $ 572,330 WATER CONSTRUCTION 392,561 ‐ 8,362 400,923 WATER DEPARTMENT 412,588 ‐ (26,692) 385,896 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 1,499,857 ‐ 12,390 1,512,247 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 969,762 ‐ (45,852) 923,910 KENT COUNTY TREATMENT CHARGE 4,235,403 ‐ 4,235,403 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL 8,153,049 ‐ (122,340) 8,030,709 OTHER EXPENSES: DEBT SERVICE ‐ WATER 246,403 ‐ ‐ 246,403 DEBT SERVICE ‐ WASTEWATER 316,198 ‐ ‐ 316,198 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 177,427 ‐ ‐ 177,427 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 372,000 ‐ ‐ 372,000 OPEB ‐ ‐ UNCOLLECTIBLES ‐ TRASH AND OTHER ‐ ‐ 71,000 71,000 INTRAFUND SERVICE FEES 1,272,331 ‐ (140,756) 1,131,575 ARBITRAGE PAYMENT 60/40 Water ‐ OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 2,384,359 ‐ (69,756) 2,314,603 TRANSFER TO: GENERAL FUND FROM WATER ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GENERAL FUND FROM WASTEWATER ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WATER IMP AND EXT 500,000 ‐ ‐ 500,000 WASTEWATER IMP AND EXT 500,000 ‐ ‐ 500,000 TRANSFER TO PENSION COLA ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SEWER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 6,802 ‐ ‐ 6,802 WATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 110,597 ‐ ‐ 110,597 CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE WATER 100,000 ‐ ‐ 100,000 CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE WASTEWATER 100,000 ‐ ‐ 100,000 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 1,317,399 ‐ ‐ 1,317,399 CURRENT YEAR BALANCES CURRENT YEAR BALANCE WATER 1,348,501 292,648 85,223 1,726,372 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE WASTEWATER 1,127,608 317,666 125,158 1,570,432 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE KCSA (1,592,679) (239,205) (1,831,884) CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 883,430 371,109 210,381 1,464,920 TOTALS $ 12,738,237 $ 371,109 $ 18,285 $ 13,127,631 7 ]

ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND REVENUES INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED BASE REVENUE: PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 12,086,275 $ 1,451,589 $ ‐ $ 13,537,864 DIRECT SALES TO CUSTOMER 96,595,300 ‐ 1,321,906 97,917,206 PURCHASE POWER ADJUSTMENT (2,000,000) ‐ (293,603) (2,293,603) UTILITY TAX 1,864,800 ‐ 100,200 1,965,000 GREEN ENERGY 128,600 ‐ 128,600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 891,200 ‐ 891,200 RENT REVENUE 186,816 ‐ 186,816 EMISSION CREDIT SALES ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER FROM CONTINGENCY ‐ 301,070 ‐ 301,070 INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS WATER/WASTEW 299,442 ‐ (126,125) 173,317 REIMBURSEMENT OF BOND ISSUANCE COST ‐ ‐ ‐ INTEREST EARNINGS 65,700 ‐ 44,600 110,300 TOTALS $ 110,118,133 $ 1,752,659 $ 1,046,978 $ 112,917,770 8

ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND EXPENSE SUMMARY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED EXPENSES: POWER SUPPLY $ 48,059,699 $ ‐ $ (425,336) $ 47,634,363 POWER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 2,280,000 ‐ 41,562 2,321,562 PJM CHARGES ‐ LOAD 11,850,876 ‐ 1,512,556 13,363,432 CAPACITY CHARGES 11,618,223 ‐ 684,169 12,302,392 RATE STABILIZATION CREDIT ‐ ‐ ‐ SUB‐TOTAL POWER SUPPLY 73,808,798 ‐ 1,812,951 75,621,749 PLANT OPERATIONS 5,694,315 ‐ 469,000 6,163,315 GENERATIONS FUELS 297,820 ‐ 2,947,157 3,244,977 PJM CREDITS (720,797) ‐ (4,832,607) (5,553,404) CAPACITY CREDITS (11,488,785) ‐ 69,062 (11,419,723) GENERATION SUBTOTAL (6,217,447) ‐ (1,347,388) (7,564,835) POWER SUPPLY & GENERATION SUBTOTAL 67,591,351 ‐ 465,563 68,056,914 DIRECT EXPENDITURES TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION 3,206,515 ‐ (159,371) 3,047,144 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 1,842,903 ‐ (87,898) 1,755,005 ADMINISTRATION 609,169 301,070 54,750 964,989 METER READING 222,908 ‐ (13,253) 209,655 SYSTEMS OPERATIONS 518,053 ‐ (25,560) 492,493 UTILITY TAX 1,864,800 ‐ 100,200 1,965,000 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTALS 8,264,348 301,070 (131,132) 8,434,286 OTHER EXPENSES: ALLOW FOR UNCOLLECTIBLES 135,000 ‐ 175,000 310,000 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 639,110 ‐ ‐ 639,110 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 833,000 ‐ ‐ 833,000 OPEB 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 GREEN ENERGY PAYMENT TO DEMEC 128,600 ‐ ‐ 128,600 INTRAFUND SERVICE FEES 3,374,945 ‐ (33,445) 3,341,500 INTEREST ON DEPOSITS 54,500 ‐ ‐ 54,500 INVENTORY WRITE OFFS 175,000 ‐ ‐ 175,000 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ POWER SUPPLY STUDY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ DEBT SERVICE 4,058,700 ‐ (468,810) 3,589,890 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 10,598,855 ‐ (327,255) 10,271,600 TRANSFER TO: ‐ IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION 3,500,000 3,500,000 GENERAL FUND 8,856,000 8,856,000 TRANSFER TO CONTINGENCY ‐ 301,070 301,070 TRANSFER TO PENSION COLA ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO DEPRECIATION RESERVE 1,250,000 1,250,000 TRANSFER FUTURE CAPACITY ‐ ‐ RATE STABILIZATION RESERVE 1,300,000 1,300,000 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 14,906,000 ‐ 301,070 15,207,070 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 8,757,579 1,451,589 738,732 10,947,900 TOTALS $ 110,118,133 $ 1,752,659 $ 1,046,978 $ 112,917,770 9

ELECTRIC CONTINGENCY RESERVE ACCOUNT CASH RECEIPTS ESTIMATE INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED BEGINNING BALANCE $ 1,039,854 $ (88) $ ‐ $ 1,039,766 INTEREST EARNINGS 31,200 ‐ ‐ 31,200 TRANSFER FROM INSURANCE STABILIZATION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC REVENUE ‐ ‐ 301,070 301,070 TOTALS $ 1,071,054 $ (88) $ 301,070 $ 1,372,036 EXPENSE SUMMARY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC FUND $ ‐ $ 279,640 $ ‐ $ 279,640 TRANSFER TO RATE STABILIZATION FUND ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 1,071,054 (279,728) 301,070 1,092,396 TOTALS $ 1,071,054 $ (88) $ 301,070 $ 1,372,036 10

ELECTRIC IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION FUND CASH RECEIPTS INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 1,688,861 $ 1,740,763 $ ‐ $ 3,429,624 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE BOND ‐ 415,585 ‐ 415,585 INTEREST EARNINGS 40,700 ‐ ‐ 40,700 INTEREST TRUSTEE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ INCOME FROM SALE OF ASSETS ‐ ‐ ‐ ELECTRIC NEW SERVICE FEES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ RECEIPT FROM DEPRECIATION RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ RECEIPT FROM FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ DEMA GRANT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STATE REIMBURSEMENT FOR SR1 &SR9 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STATE REIMBURSEMENT FOR GOVS AVE ‐ 254,757 ‐ 254,757 STATE REIMBURSEMENT WYOMING MILL RD ‐ ‐ 91,000 91,000 STATE GRANTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ FEDERAL GRANTS 135,152 ‐ 135,152 INSURANCE CLAIM PROCEEDS ‐ 280,000 ‐ 280,000 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC 3,500,000 ‐ ‐ 3,500,000 TOTALS $ 5,229,561 $ 2,826,257 $ 91,000 $ 8,146,818 EXPENSE SUMMARY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED ELECTRIC GENERATION $ 1,480,068 $ 626,359 $ ‐ $ 2,106,427 TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION 739,000 ‐ ‐ 739,000 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 1,390,429 258,866 91,000 1,740,295 ADMINISTRATION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ METER READING ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SYSTEMS OPERATIONS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TRANSFER TO DEPRECIATION RESERVE 1,000,000 ‐ 1,000,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 1,620,064 941,032 ‐ 2,561,096 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE ‐BOND ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TOTALS $ 5,229,561 $ 2,826,257 $ 91,000 $ 8,146,818 11

COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND OPERATING REVENUES INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 100,913 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 100,913 GRANTS REVENUE 1,000,000 ‐ ‐ 1,000,000 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 300,000 ‐ 25,000 325,000 INTEREST INCOME 2,800 ‐ ‐ 2,800 ‐ TOTALS $ 1,403,713 $ ‐ $ 25,000 $ 1,428,713 OPERATING EXPENSES INFO ONLY INFO ONLY INFO ONLY 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 2010‐11 BUDGET PRIOR ADJMTS LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED PROGRAM EXPENSES $ 1,300,000 $ ‐ $ 25,000 $ 1,325,000 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 103,713 ‐ ‐ 103,713 TOTALS $ 1,403,713 $ ‐ $ 25,000 $ 1,428,713 12

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate GENERAL FUND REVNEUES BEG BALANCE 2,277,575 2,654,528 1,034 2,655,562 Permits and Other Licenses TRAILER LICENSES 17,000 17,000 7,000 24,000 BUILDING PERMITS 425,000 425,000 (50,000) 375,000 SPRINKLER 25,000 25,000 (7,000) 18,000 MISCELLANEOUS 25,000 25,000 3,000 28,000 492,000 492,000 (47,000) 445,000 Permits and Other Licenses VACANT BUILDING REG 10,000 10,000 5,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 15,000 Grants OTHER FED/STATE GRANTS ‐ ‐ 16,000 16,000 OP TRANS FROM 710 & 712 138,350 138,350 (58,350) 80,000 RECREATION ‐ ‐ 51,000 51,000 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS DEMA ‐ ‐ 172,061 172,061 OPERATING TRANS FROM 714 73,500 73,500 (73,500) ‐ 211,850 211,850 107,211 319,061 Fines and Police Revenue COURT OF COMM PLEAS FINES 80,000 80,000 (25,000) 55,000 J P COURT FINES 215,000 215,000 5,000 220,000 POLICE DEPARTMENT FINES 160,000 160,000 30,000 190,000 POLICE SPECIAL DONATIONS ‐ ‐ 14,887 14,887 BOAT LICENSES 6,500 6,500 (500) 6,000 MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 5,000 13,000 18,000 POLICE O/T SERVICE 35,000 35,000 5,000 40,000 911 FEE REVENUE 45,000 45,000 15,000 60,000 546,500 546,500 57,387 603,887 Investment Income FUND INTEREST INCOME 224,000 224,000 (108,000) 116,000 224,000 224,000 (108,000) 116,000 Transfers From OPER TSF FROM ERLSP (212) 930,000 930,000 70,000 1,000,000 OPER TSF FRM TSF TAX(214) 1,000,000 650,000 750,000 1,400,000 1,930,000 1,580,000 820,000 2,400,000 13

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate Miscellaneous Charges FRANCHISE FEES 486,000 486,000 34,000 520,000 GRASS CUTTING 8,500 8,500 11,500 20,000 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 300,000 300,000 73,500 373,500 TRASH REVENUE 2,244,511 2,244,511 (194,511) 2,050,000 3,039,011 3,039,011 (75,511) 2,963,500 Interfund Service Receipts WATER/WASTEWATER 972,889 972,889 (16,480) 956,409 ELECTRIC 3,374,945 3,374,945 (37,724) 3,337,221 4,347,834 4,347,834 (54,204) 4,293,630 GENERAL FUND REVENUES 705,917 14

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES City Clerk SALARIES 171,103 171,103 4,445 175,548 FICA TAXES 12,291 12,291 861 13,152 HEALTH INSURANCE 42,234 42,234 (3,285) 38,949 WORKERS COMPENSATION 894 894 36 930 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 10,000 10,000 (7,821) 2,179 PENSION 6,635 6,635 2,729 9,364 243,157 243,157 (3,035) 240,122 Tax Assessor SALARIES 125,548 125,548 830 126,378 TEMPORARY HELP 11,649 11,649 (8,479) 3,170 FICA TAXES 10,244 10,244 (396) 9,848 HEALTH INSURANCE 18,158 18,158 (166) 17,992 L I D INSURANCE 950 950 (389) 561 WORKERS COMPENSATION 863 863 (100) 763 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 10,000 10,000 (10,000) ‐ PENSION 6,764 6,764 197 6,961 LEGAL EXPENSES ‐ ‐ 88,000 88,000 184,176 184,176 69,497 253,673 Fire SALARIES 268,610 268,610 (22,472) 246,138 OVERTIME 38,365 38,365 11,432 49,797 TEMPORARY HELP 25,070 25,070 (21,343) 3,727 FICA TAXES 25,418 25,418 (2,551) 22,867 HEALTH INSURANCE 52,785 52,785 (9,196) 43,589 410,248 410,248 (44,130) 366,118 Grounds SALARIES 619,274 619,274 (20,221) 599,053 OVERTIME 17,000 17,000 17,110 34,110 FICA TAXES 48,250 48,250 (103) 48,147 HEALTH INSURANCE 150,022 150,022 (18,413) 131,609 PENSION 26,486 26,486 (2,041) 24,445 861,032 861,032 (23,668) 837,364 15

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate Library SALARIES 715,592 715,592 (18,743) 696,849 FICA TAXES 53,902 53,902 (991) 52,911 HEALTH INSURANCE 119,495 119,495 (25,740) 93,755 L I D INSURANCE 3,792 3,792 200 3,992 WORKERS COMPENSATION 3,807 3,807 105 3,912 PENSION 26,916 26,916 (1,542) 25,374 923,504 923,504 (46,711) 876,793 Parks & Recreation SALARIES 356,413 356,413 (2,943) 353,470 TEMPORARY HELP 28,489 28,489 (6,160) 22,329 FICA TAXES 28,873 28,873 (451) 28,422 HEALTH INSURANCE 64,267 64,267 (3,289) 60,978 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 114,000 114,000 51,000 165,000 592,042 592,042 38,157 630,199 Life Safety SALARIES 199,292 199,292 (3,127) 196,165 OVERTIME 10,000 10,000 ‐ 10,000 TEMPORARY HELP ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ FICA TAXES 15,788 15,788 (44) 15,744 HEALTH INSURANCE 22,687 22,687 2,740 25,427 L I D INSURANCE 1,072 1,072 113 1,185 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,805 1,805 457 2,262 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PENSION 10,705 10,705 (382) 10,323 SECURITY/SAFETY MATERIALS 15,400 15,400 16,000 31,400 276,749 276,749 15,757 292,506 Code Enforcement SALARIES 169,682 169,682 (5,836) 163,846 TEMPORARY HELP ‐ ‐ 24,275 24,275 FICA TAXES 12,549 12,549 1,656 14,205 HEALTH INSURANCE 50,377 50,377 (2,855) 47,522 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 3,500 3,500 (3,500) ‐ PENSION 7,270 7,270 (511) 6,759 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 8,000 8,000 5,000 13,000 251,378 251,378 18,229 269,607 Inspections DEMOLITION EXPENSES 50,000 50,000 65,000 115,000 50,000 50,000 65,000 115,000 16

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate Police‐Adminstration PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 53,000 ‐ 40,000 93,000 53,000 ‐ 40,000 93,000 Police ‐ Civilian SALARIES 1,286,327 1,286,327 (18,890) 1,267,437 OVERTIME 50,000 50,000 3,578 53,578 FICA TAXES 102,306 102,306 (1,248) 101,058 HEALTH INSURANCE 240,605 240,605 (7,036) 233,569 L I D INSURANCE 7,425 7,425 (115) 7,310 WORKERS COMPENSATION 8,723 8,723 (1,043) 7,680 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 4,200 4,200 (4,200) ‐ PENSION 55,659 55,659 12,724 68,383 1,755,245 1,755,245 (16,230) 1,739,015 Police ‐ Law Enforcement SALARIES 6,554,618 6,554,618 (276,769) 6,277,849 OVERTIME 450,000 450,000 32,402 482,402 FICA TAXES 484,941 484,941 32,218 517,159 HEALTH INSURANCE 1,014,227 1,014,227 (20,424) 993,803 L I D INSURANCE 24,888 24,888 214 25,102 WORKERS COMPENSATION 347,772 347,772 (18,679) 329,093 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 28,100 28,100 4,373 32,473 PENSION 852,082 852,082 40,145 892,227 9,756,628 9,756,628 (206,520) 9,550,108 17

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate Streets SALARIES 431,156 431,156 (20,496) 410,660 FICA TAXES 33,609 33,609 (1,116) 32,493 HEALTH INSURANCE 99,023 99,023 (3,950) 95,073 SAND AND SALT 4,000 4,000 20,576 24,576 MAINT EQUIP REPAIRS/MAIN 24,000 24,000 18,516 42,516 591,788 591,788 13,530 605,318 Sanitation SALARIES 449,699 449,699 2,621 452,320 OVERTIME 18,000 18,000 8,761 26,761 HEALTH INSURANCE 118,166 118,166 (1,101) 117,065 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,442,186 1,442,186 (59,786) 1,382,400 2,028,051 2,028,051 (49,505) 1,978,546 City Manager SALARIES 347,877 347,877 1,460 349,337 FICA TAXES 23,214 23,214 2,255 25,469 HEALTH INSURANCE 38,412 38,412 2,555 40,967 PENSION 18,626 18,626 473 19,099 LEGAL EXPENSES 89,000 88,800 11,200 100,000 517,129 516,929 17,943 534,872 Information Technologies SALARIES 380,390 357,890 (57,836) 300,054 FICA TAXES 25,697 25,697 (2,905) 22,792 HEALTH INSURANCE 60,316 60,316 (1,427) 58,889 L I D INSURANCE 2,219 2,219 121 2,340 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,826 1,826 64 1,890 PENSION 16,060 16,060 (2,704) 13,356 OFF EQUIP/REPAIRS & MAINT 139,279 139,279 13,802 153,081 486,508 464,008 (50,885) 399,321 Finance SALARIES 491,495 491,495 (35,000) 456,495 TEMPORARY HELP ‐ ‐ 35,000 35,000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,500 2,500 (500) 2,000 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 8,500 8,500 (500) 8,000 TELEPHONE/FAX 2,000 2,000 (300) 1,700 ADVERTISEMENT 300 300 (100) 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 163,600 163,600 (20,600) 143,000 668,395 668,395 (22,000) 646,395 18

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate Facilities Maintenance SALARIES 587,035 587,035 (22,446) 564,589 TEMPORARY HELP 24,403 24,403 (4,614) 19,789 FICA TAXES 46,153 46,153 (1,764) 44,389 HEALTH INSURANCE 125,921 125,921 (4,931) 120,990 PENSION 24,642 24,642 (1,170) 23,472 808,154 808,154 (34,925) 773,229 Central Services SALARIES 249,821 249,821 3,810 253,631 FICA TAXES 18,799 18,799 516 19,315 HEALTH INSURANCE 63,797 63,797 (18,347) 45,450 WORKERS COMPENSATION 5,431 5,431 1,118 6,549 PENSION 12,431 12,431 (230) 12,201 350,279 350,279 (13,133) 337,146 Fleet Maintenance SALARIES 264,010 264,010 578 264,588 OVERTIME 1,500 1,500 4,476 5,976 FICA 19,879 19,879 486 20,365 HEALTH INSURANCE 66,226 66,226 (596) 65,630 WORKMANS COMP. 10,780 10,780 194 10,974 PENSION 13,444 13,444 265 13,709 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 367,700 367,700 (35,700) 332,000 743,539 743,539 (30,297) 713,242 Customer Service SALARIES 566,225 566,225 6,460 572,685 FICA TAXES 42,592 42,592 814 43,406 HEALTH INSURANCE 132,840 132,840 3,643 136,483 L I D INSURANCE 3,416 3,416 72 3,488 WORKERS COMPENSATION 3,002 3,002 31 3,033 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 11,000 11,000 (7,616) 3,384 PENSION 25,397 25,397 815 26,212 784,472 784,472 4,219 788,691 Human Resources OVERTIME 1,000 1,000 (1,000) ‐ EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 6,000 6,000 (2,000) 4,000 CONSULTING FEES 9,500 9,500 (9,500) ‐ 16,500 16,500 (12,500) 4,000 Transfer to Contingency TRANSFER TO CONTINGENCY RES ‐ ‐ 172,061 172,061 Uncollectible Reserve UNCOLLECTIBLES‐TRASH&OTHR 10,000 10,000 100,000 110,000 Budget Balance BUDGET BALANCE 2,913,300 2,940,253 758,865 3,699,118 19

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate 2,923,300 2,950,253 1,030,926 3,981,179 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 719,719 GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS REVNEUES OTHER FED/STATE GRANTS 3,361,520 4,250,348 20,000 4,270,348 3,361,520 4,250,348 20,000 4,270,348 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS REVNEUES 20,000 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS EXPENDITURES Grounds TRUCKS ‐ PURCHASE 54,575 54,328 (17,158) 37,170 54,575 54,328 (17,158) 37,170 Police AUTOMOBILES ‐ PURCHASE 282,380 282,380 (12,352) 270,028 CONSTRUCTION ‐ PURCHASE ‐ ‐ 20,000 20,000 282,380 282,380 7,648 290,028 Streets TRUCKS ‐ PURCHASE 131,055 131,055 (26,579) 104,476 131,055 131,055 (26,579) 104,476 Sanitation TRUCKS ‐ PURCHASE 246,075 246,075 (33,656) 212,419 246,075 246,075 (33,656) 212,419 Information Technologies COMPUTER HARDWARE/CAPITAL 12,000 5,000 (5,000) ‐ 12,000 5,000 (5,000) ‐ Budget Balance BUDGET BALANCE 92,323 125,446 69,745 195,191 Trns to Comm Trans Fund TRF TO COMM TRANS FUND ‐ ‐ 25,000 25,000 92,323 125,446 94,745 220,191 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS EXPENDITURES 20,000 20

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate WATER/WASTEWATER FUND REVNEUES Beginning Balances BEG BALANCE 943,545 1,236,193 353 1,236,546 BEG BAL WASTEWATER 585,053 902,719 (353) 902,366 1,528,598 2,138,912 ‐ 2,138,912 Interest FUND INTEREST INCOME 1,515 1,515 18,285 19,800 1,515 1,515 18,285 19,800 WATER/WASTEWATER REVNEUES 18,285 WATER/WASTEWATER FUND EXPENSES Engineering SALARIES 427,574 427,574 (60,599) 366,975 FICA TAXES 31,821 31,821 (3,943) 27,878 HEALTH INSURANCE 75,434 75,434 (4,579) 70,855 L I D INSURANCE 2,597 2,597 (299) 2,298 WORKERS COMPENSATION 3,660 3,660 712 4,372 PENSION 17,716 17,716 (1,840) 15,876 558,802 558,802 (70,548) 488,254 Construction SALARIES 235,622 235,622 1,449 237,071 OVERTIME 5,000 5,000 5,391 10,391 FICA TAXES 17,231 17,231 1,283 18,514 HEALTH INSURANCE 65,279 65,279 (768) 64,511 WORKERS COMPENSATION 8,303 8,303 981 9,284 PENSION 8,959 8,959 26 8,985 340,394 340,394 8,362 348,756 Water SALARIES 177,153 177,153 (21,584) 155,569 OVERTIME 3,500 3,500 6,486 9,986 FICA TAXES 13,248 13,248 (750) 12,498 HEALTH INSURANCE 59,217 59,217 (10,320) 48,897 L I D INSURANCE 1,039 1,039 40 1,079 WORKERS COMPENSATION 4,221 4,221 162 4,383 PENSION 7,659 7,659 (726) 6,933 266,037 266,037 (26,692) 239,345 21

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate Wastewater SALARIES 411,700 411,700 (28,255) 383,445 OVERTIME 57,500 57,500 (23,016) 34,484 FICA TAXES 30,961 30,961 671 31,632 HEALTH INSURANCE 105,851 105,851 3,148 108,999 L I D INSURANCE 2,042 2,042 40 2,082 WORKERS COMPENSATION 16,525 16,525 433 16,958 PENSION 17,529 17,529 1,127 18,656 642,108 642,108 (45,852) 596,256 Water Treatment Plant HEALTH INSURANCE 114,403 114,403 11,476 125,879 PENSION 19,989 19,989 914 20,903 134,392 134,392 12,390 146,782 Budget Balance BUDGET BALANCE 1,348,501 1,641,149 85,223 1,726,372 Bud Bal Wastewater BUDGET BAL WASTEWATER 1,127,608 1,445,274 127,007 1,572,281 Uncollectible Reserve TR TO UNCOLLECTIBLE RESRV ‐ ‐ 71,000 71,000 Interfund Service Fee INTERFUND SERVICE FEE 1,272,331 1,272,331 (142,605) 1,129,726 3,748,440 4,358,754 140,625 4,499,379 WATER/WASTEWATER FUND EXPENSES 18,285 22

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate ELECTRIC FUND REVENUES Interest Earnings FUND INTEREST INCOME 65,700 65,700 44,600 110,300 65,700 65,700 44,600 110,300 Power Cost Adj FUEL/WASTE‐WATER ADJUST (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (293,603) (2,292,603) Direct Sales to Cust DIRECT SALES TO CUSTOMERS 29,143,500 29,143,500 1,321,906 30,465,406 Utility Tax STATE UTILITY TAX 1,864,800 1,864,800 100,200 1,965,000 29,008,300 29,008,300 1,128,503 30,137,803 Interfund Service Fees WATER/WASTEWATER 299,442 299,442 (126,125) 173,317 299,442 299,442 (126,125) 173,317 ELECTRIC FUND REVENUES 1,046,978 ELECTRIC FUND EXPENSES Plant Operations OVERTIME 179,816 179,816 33,000 212,816 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE ‐ 5,000 (5,000) ‐ INCENTIVE ACUMULATOR 287,748 227,748 (3,600) 224,148 INCENTIVE BURDEN (21.0%) 63,362 53,362 (4,000) 49,362 BURDEN @ 40% 760,113 760,113 (30,000) 730,113 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 7,500 7,500 (4,500) 3,000 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 14,895 14,895 (7,000) 7,895 WATER/SEWER 38,000 38,000 90,000 128,000 OPERATOR INSURANCE 381,000 341,000 (25,000) 316,000 ELECTRICITY 620,000 620,000 448,000 1,068,000 HEATING OIL/GAS 50,000 50,000 (8,000) 42,000 TRAINING/CONF/FOOD/TRAVEL 45,494 45,494 (2,000) 43,494 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33,240 73,240 4,000 77,240 ENVIRONMENT EXPENSES 108,200 108,200 (5,000) 103,200 OPERATOR INCENTIVE 156,775 126,775 (4,500) 122,275 HOME OFFICE LABOR 98,340 98,340 (14,000) 84,340 AUXILLARY SYSTEMS 36,000 36,000 (3,000) 33,000 BOILER SYSTEMS 30,000 130,000 5,000 135,000 DCS CONTROL SYSTEM 12,000 12,000 (3,400) 8,600 COOLING TOWER 6,000 6,000 2,000 8,000 FUEL OIL/GAS SYSTEMS 4,000 4,000 (2,500) 1,500 COMBUSTION TURBINE MAINT 12,000 12,000 15,000 27,000 POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 12,000 12,000 (3,500) 8,500 TURBINE GENERATOR SYSTEMS 22,000 22,000 (3,000) 19,000 2,978,483 2,983,483 469,000 3,452,483 23

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate Power Supply and Generation OPERATOR/SUPPLY MGMT FEE 2,280,000 2,280,000 41,562 2,321,562 3RD PARTY HEDGE PURCHASES 48,059,699 48,059,699 (425,336) 47,634,363 CAPACITY CHARGES 11,618,223 11,618,223 684,169 12,302,392 CAPACITY CREDITS (11,488,785) (11,488,785) 69,062 (11,419,723) PJM CHARGES 11,850,876 11,850,876 1,512,556 13,363,432 PJM CREDITS (720,797) (720,797) (4,832,607) (5,553,404) GAS FUEL 297,820 297,820 2,947,157 3,244,977 61,897,036 61,897,036 (3,437) 61,893,599 Transmission & Distribution SALARIES 1,571,677 1,571,677 (133,931) 1,437,746 OVERTIME 110,074 110,074 15,249 125,323 FICA TAXES 116,577 116,577 1,387 117,964 HEALTH INSURANCE 308,554 308,554 (39,307) 269,247 L I D INSURANCE 6,405 6,405 (23) 6,382 WORKERS COMPENSATION 64,058 64,058 (668) 63,390 PENSION 65,806 65,806 (2,078) 63,728 2,243,151 2,243,151 (159,371) 2,083,780 Engineering SALARIES 699,407 699,407 (52,219) 647,188 OVERTIME 47,320 47,320 (38,748) 8,572 FICA TAXES 52,456 52,456 (2,789) 49,667 HEALTH INSURANCE 100,514 100,514 3,064 103,578 WORKERS COMPENSATION 20,429 20,429 2,794 23,223 920,126 920,126 (87,898) 832,228 Electric Admin CITY BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES 89,694 89,694 54,750 144,444 89,694 89,694 54,750 144,444 Meter Reading SALARIES 127,495 127,495 (3,942) 123,553 OVERTIME 13,610 13,610 (7,258) 6,352 FICA TAXES 10,582 10,582 (742) 9,840 HEALTH INSURANCE 28,646 28,646 (883) 27,763 WORKERS COMPENSATION 5,699 5,699 (428) 5,271 186,032 186,032 (13,253) 172,779 24

ADJUSTMENTS BY LINE ITEM LATEST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2010‐2011 AS OF 02/28/11 Information Only Information Only Information Only Category Description 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 2010‐2011 Budget Adj Bud LE Adjustment Latest Estimate Systems Operations SALARIES 348,978 348,978 (29,980) 318,998 OVERTIME 61,350 61,350 (4,940) 56,410 FICA TAXES 25,234 25,234 3,158 28,392 HEALTH INSURANCE 58,612 58,612 1,481 60,093 WORKERS COMPENSATION 6,358 6,358 4,386 10,744 PENSION 14,867 14,867 335 15,202 515,399 515,399 (25,560) 489,839 Budget Balance BUDGET BALANCE 8,757,579 1,451,589 738,732 10,947,900 Uncollectible reserve TR TO UNCOLLECTIBLE RESRV 135,000 135,000 175,000 310,000 Utility Tax Payment UT TAX PAYMENT TO STATE 1,864,800 1,864,800 100,200 1,965,000 Debt Service FINANCIAL CHARGES 4,058,700 4,058,700 (468,810) 3,589,890 Interfund Service Fee INTERFUND SERVICE FEE 3,374,945 3,374,945 (33,445) 3,337,221 Trans. To Contingency TR TO CONTINGENCY RESERVE ‐ ‐ 301,070 301,070 18,191,024 10,885,034 812,747 20,451,081 ELECTRIC FUND EXPENSES TOTALS 1,046,978 ELECTRIC IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION FUND REVENUES State Reimbursement OTHER FED/STATE GRANTS ‐ 389,909 91,000 480,909 ‐ 389,909 91,000 480,909 ELECTRIC IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION FUND EXPENSES Wyoming Mill Road Project DISTRIBUTION UPGRADES 750,511 753,961 91,000 844,961 750,511 753,961 91,000 844,961 REALTY TRANSFER TAX Revenue REALTY TRANSFER TAX 1,000,000 1,000,000 400,000 1,400,000 Expense TRANSF TO GEN FUND (110) 1,000,000 1,000,000 400,000 1,400,000 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND REVENUE Revenue from Gen Cap Proj REV FROM GEN FUND (110) 300,000 300,000 25,000 325,000 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND EXPENSES CONSTRUCTION ‐ PURCHASE CONSTRUCTION ‐ PURCHASE 1,300,000 1,300,000 25,000 1,325,000 25

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2011‐09 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 2 The amounts hereinafternamed in various City funds are changes from the currently approved 3 revenues/receipts and appropriations to the revised revenues/receipts and revised 4 appropriations for use by the various departments of the Municipal Government for: 5 6 20010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 7 GENERAL FUND 8 CASH RECEIPTS AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 9 INFO ONLY 10 2010‐11 2010‐11 11 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 12 RECEIPTS 13 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE 1,034 2,655,562 14 FINES AND POLICE REVENUE 42,387 578,889 15 911 FEE 15,000 60,000 16 INVESTMENT INCOME (108,000) 116,000 17 LIBRARY REVENUES ‐ 64,189 18 KENT COUNTY BOOK REIMBURSEMENT ‐ 460,000 19 BUSINESS LICENSES ‐ 1,523,675 20 PERMITS AND OTHER LICENSES (42,000) 892,000 21 22 23 DEMOLITION REVENUE MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES POLICE EXTRA DUTY T ‐ 11,500 ‐ ‐ 65,750 300,000 24 25 26 27 28 29 PROPERTY TAXES BID REVENUE RECREATION REVENUE FRANCHISE FEE TRASH FEES AF DSWA TRASH FEE REBATE ‐ ‐ ‐ 34,000 (194,511) ‐ 10,982,634 52,692 141,500 520,000 2,050,000 143,000 DR 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 RENT REVENUE ‐ GARRISON FARM COURT OF CHANCERY FEES RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS WATER/WASTEWATER INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS ELECTRIC INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL GRANTS POLICE RELATED ‐ ‐ (240,590) (14,631) (33,445) (48,076) (58,350) 87,000 645,000 21,337,891 958,258 3 341 ,341,500 4,299,758 80,000 39 CAPITAL SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE ‐ 73,500 40 POLICE PENSION GRANT ‐ 620,000 41 RECREATION GRANTS 51,000 51,000 42 MISC GRANT REVENUE ‐ ‐ 43 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 188,061 188,061 44 SALE OF ASSETS ‐ ‐ 45 GRANTS SUBTOTAL 180,711 1,012,561 Page 1

46 20010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 47 GENERAL FUND ‐ CONTINUED 48 INFO ONLY 49 2010‐11 2010‐11 50 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 51 52 TRANSFERS FROM 53 TRANSFER TAX 750,000 1 400 ,400,000 54 MUNICIPAL STREET AID ‐ 526,843 55 CIVIL TRAFFIC PENALTIES 70,000 1,000,000 56 WATER/WASTEWATER ‐ ‐ 57 ELECTRIC ‐ 8,856,000 58 PARKLAND RESERVE ‐ ‐ 59 LIBRARY RESERVE ‐ ‐ 60 CAPITAL SS ASSET S RESERVE ‐ ‐ 61 WORKER'S COMP FUND ‐ ‐ 62 CONTINGENCY FUND ‐ 63 TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL 820,000 11,782,843 65 TOTALS 712,045 38,433,053 66 67 EXPENSES 68 CITY CLERK (3,035) 284,368 69 70 71 72 COUNCIL TAX ASSESSOR FIRE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE T ‐ 69,497 (44,130) (23,668) 130,769 266,746 665,732 1,031,889 73 74 75 76 77 78 LIBRARY RECREATION LIFE SAFETY CODE INFORCEMENT PLANNING INSPECTIONS AF (46,711) 38,157 15,757 18,229 ‐ 65,000 1,079,516 816,626 517,592 295,010 422,893 559,807 DR 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICE POLICE EXTRA DUTY STREETS SANITATION CITY MANAGER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FINANCE PUBLIC SERVICES ‐ ADMINISTRATION ‐ (182,750) ‐ 13,530 (49,505) 17,943 (50,885) (22,000) ‐ 247,488 12,275,623 449,516 815,559 2,297,839 579,515 697,329 805,169 369,752 88 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT (34,925) 955,832 89 CENTRAL SERVICES (13,133) 656,844 90 FLEET MAINTENANCE (30,297) 731,632 91 CUSTOMER SERVICES 4,219 873,623 92 HUMAN RESOURCES (12,500) 346,390 93 MAYOR ‐ 88,341 94 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTALS (271,207) 28,261,400 Page 2

95 20010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 96 GENERAL FUND ‐ CONTINUED 97 INFO ONLY 98 2010‐11 2010‐11 99 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 100 RETIREES HEALTH CARE ‐ 1,297,509 101 RETIREES PAYMENTS ‐ ‐ 102 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY ‐ 995,000 103 POLICE PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY ‐ 95,000 104 POLICE PENSION FUND ‐ 620,000 105 OPEB ‐ ‐ 106 UNCOLLECTIBLES ‐ TRASH AND OTHER 100,000 110,000 107 LOSS ON SALE OF ASSET ‐ ‐ 108 STORM EMERGENCY ‐ ‐ 109 STREET G LIGHTS ‐ 985,000 110 OTHER EXPENSE SUBTOTAL 272,061 5,206,370 111 GRANTS 112 IT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN ‐ ‐ 113 GRANTS SUBTOTAL ‐ ‐ 114 TRANSFERS 115 TRANSFER TO PENSION COLA ‐ ‐ 116 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ 117 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND ‐ PROJECTS 118 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND ‐ RESERVE 119 TRANSFER TO STREET PROGRAM T 120 TRANSFER TO PARKLAND/RECREATION RESERVE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 307 ,307,839 ‐ ‐ ‐ AF 121 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY RESERVE 122 TRANSFER TO CDBG FUND 123 TRANSFER TO VERIZON RESERVE 124 INVENTORY WRITE OFFS 125 TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL 126 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 711,191 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,000 ‐ ‐ 1,313,839 3,651,444 DR 128 TOTALS $ 712,045 $ 38,433,053 Page 3

129 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 130 GENERAL CONTINGENCY FUND 131 CASH RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL 2010‐2011 132 INFO ONLY 133 2010‐11 2010‐11 134 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 135 CASH RECEIPTS 136 BEGINNING BALANCE $ ‐ $ 530,393 137 INTEREST EARNINGS ‐ 23,100 138 REIMBURSEMENT FROM DEMA (SNOW EMERGENCY) 172,061 172,061 140 TOTALS 172,061 725,554 141 142 EXPENDITURES 143 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND ‐ ‐ 144 TRANSFER TO OPEB ‐ ‐ 145 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY FUND ‐ ‐ 146 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 172,061 725,554 148 TOTALS $ 172,061 $ 725,554 T AF DR Page 4

149 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 150 GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 151 CASH RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL 2010‐2011 152 INFO ONLY 153 2010‐11 2010‐11 154 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 155 CASH RECEIPTS 156 BEGINNING BALANCE ‐ PROJECTS $ ‐ $ 227,592 157 STATE GRANTS ‐ 4,232,348 158 INTEREST EARNINGS ‐ 10,900 159 INCOME FROM SALE OF ASSETS ‐ ‐ 160 RECREATION GRANTS ‐ 34,583 161 POLICE GRANTS 20,000 38,000 162 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS ‐ ‐ 163 LIBRARY OBOND SSU /CO ISSUE/CONTRIBUTIONS ‐ 1,000,000 164 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND FOR PROJECTS ‐ 1,307,839 165 TRANSFER FROM PARKLAND RESERVE (JWP CNTR) ‐ ‐ 166 TRANSFER FROM LIBRARY RESERVE ‐ 2,363,732 167 GIFTS/DONATIONS (RECREATION) ‐ ‐ 168 PARKLAND RESERVE RECEIPT ‐ 36,872 169 TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ 170 TOTALS 20,000 9,251,866 171 172 EXPENDITURES 173 CITY CLERK 174 COUNCIL T ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 175 TAX ASSESSOR 176 FIRE AF 177 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 178 LIBRARY 179 RECREATION 180 LIFE SAFETY ‐ ‐ (17,158) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 223,700 46,517 7,630,663 81,872 ‐ DR 181 PLANNING 182 INSPECTIONS 183 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 184 POLICE 185 STREETS 186 SANITATION 187 CITY MANAGER 188 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 189 FINANCE ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,648 (26,579) (33,656) ‐ (5,000) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 343,528 454,476 212,419 ‐ 7,000 ‐ 190 PUBLIC SERVICES ‐ ADMINISTRATION ‐ ‐ 191 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ‐ ‐ 192 CENTRAL SERVICES ‐ ‐ 193 FLEET MAINTENANCE ‐ ‐ 194 CUSTOMER SERVICES ‐ ‐ 195 HUMAN RESOURCES ‐ ‐ 196 MAYOR ‐ 31,500 197 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTAL (74,745) 9,031,675 198 TRANSFERS 199 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ 200 TRANSFER TO PARKLAND RESERVE ‐ ‐ 201 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY RESERVE ‐ ‐ 202 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND ‐ ‐ 203 TRANSFER TO COMMUNITY TRANS. FUND 318 25,000 25,000 204 TRANSFER SUBTOTAL 25,000 25,000 205 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 69,745 195,191 207 TOTALS $ 20,000 $ 9,251,866 Page 5

208 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 209 WATER/WASTEWATER FUND 210 REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL 2010‐2011 211 INFO ONLY 212 2010‐11 2010‐11 213 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 214 REVENUE 215 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE ‐ WATER $ 353 $ 1 236 ,236,546 216 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE ‐ WASTEWATER ‐ 902,719 217 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE ‐ KCSA (353) (1,872,434) 218 WATER FEES ‐ 4,206,700 219 WASTEWATER FEES ‐ 3,308,300 220 WASTEWATER ADJUSTMENT FEES ‐ 4,275,600 221 WATER TANK SPACE LEASING ‐ 299,400 222 SEWER IMPACT FEES ‐ 323,000 223 WATER IMPACT FEES ‐ 357,000 224 INTEREST ‐ WATER 8,206 8,886 225 INTEREST ‐ WASTEWATER 10,079 10,914 226 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE ‐ 71,000 227 REVENUE SUBTOTAL 18,285 13,127,631 228 GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS 229 STATE REIMBURSEMENT ‐ ‐ 230 GRANT REVENUE 231 GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS SUBTOTAL 232 TRANSFERS FROM 233 TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE T ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ AF 234 TRANSFER FROM CONTINGENCY 235 TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL 237 TOTALS $ ‐ ‐ 18,285 $ ‐ ‐ 13,127,631 DR Page 6

238 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 239 WATER/WASTEWATER FUND ‐ CONTINUED 240 INFO ONLY 241 2010‐11 2010‐11 242 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 243 EXPENSES 244 ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ (70,548) $ 572,330 245 WATER CONSTRUCTION 8,362 400,923 246 WATER DEPARTMENT (26,692) 385,896 247 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 12,390 1,512,247 248 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT (45,852) 923,910 249 KENT COUNTY TREATMENT CHARGE 4,235,403 250 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL (122,340) 8,030,709 251 OTHER EXPENSES 252 DEBT SERVICE ‐ WATER ‐ 6, 246,403 253 DEBT SERVICE ‐ WASTEWATER ‐ 316,198 254 RETIREES HEALTH CARE ‐ 177,427 255 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY ‐ 372,000 256 OPEB ‐ 257 UNCOLLECTIBLES ‐ TRASH AND OTHER 71,000 71,000 258 INTRAFUND SERVICE FEES (140,756) 1,131,575 259 ARBITRAGE PAYMENT 60/40 Water ‐ 260 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 261 TRANSFER TO 262 GENERAL FUND FROM WATER 263 GENERAL FUND FROM WASTEWATER T (69,756) ‐ ‐ 2 314 ,314,603 ‐ ‐ 264 WATER IMP AND EXT AF 265 WASTEWATER IMP AND EXT 266 TRANSFER TO PENSION COLA 267 SEWER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 268 WATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 269 CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE WATER ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 500,000 ‐ 6,802 110,597 100,000 DR 270 CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE WASTEWATER 271 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 272 CURRENT YEAR BALANCES 273 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE WATER 274 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE WASTEWATER 275 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE KCSA 276 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 278 TOTALS $ ‐ ‐ 85,223 125,158 210,381 18,285 $ 100,000 1,317,399 1,726,372 1,570,432 (1,831,884) 1,464,920 13,127,631 Page 7

279 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 280 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND 281 REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL 2010‐2011 282 INFO ONLY 283 2010‐11 2010‐11 284 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 285 REVENUE 286 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ ‐ $ 13 537 ,537,864 287 DIRECT SALES TO CUSTOMER 1,321,906 97,917,206 288 PURCHASE POWER ADJUSTMENT (293,603) (2,293,603) 289 UTILITY TAX 100,200 1,965,000 290 GREEN ENERGY 128,600 291 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 891,200 292 RENT REVENUE 186,816 293 EMISSION CREDIT SALES ‐ 294 TRANSFER FROM CONTINGENCY ‐ 301,070 295 INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS WATER/WASTEWATER (126,125) 173,317 296 REIMBURSEMENT OF BOND ISSUANCE COST ‐ 297 INTEREST EARNINGS 44,600 110,300 299 TOTALS $ 1,046,978 $ 112,917,770 T AF DR Page 8

300 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 301 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND ‐ CONTINUED 302 INFO ONLY 303 2010‐11 2010‐11 304 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 305 EXPENSES 306 POWER SUPPLY $ (425,336) $ 47,634,363 307 POWER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 41,562 2 321 ,321,562 308 PJM CHARGES ‐ LOAD 1,512,556 13,363,432 309 CAPACITY CHARGES 684,169 12,302,392 310 RATE STABILIZATION CREDIT ‐ ‐ 311 SUB‐TOTAL POWER SUPPLY 1,812,951 75,621,749 312 PLANT OPERATIONS 469,000 6,163,315 313 GENERATIONS FUELS 2,947,157 3,244,977 314 J PJM CREDITS 4,832,607) ( ,83 (5,553,404) 315 CAPACITY CREDITS 69,062 (11,419,723) 316 GENERATION SUBTOTAL (1,347,388) (7,564,835) 317 POWER SUPPLY & GENERATION SUBTOTAL 465,563 68,056,914 318 DIRECT EXPENDITURES 319 TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION (159,371) 3,047,144 320 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (87,898) 1,755,005 321 ADMINISTRATION 54,750 964,989 322 METER READING 323 SYSTEMS OPERATIONS 324 UTILITY TAX 325 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTALS T (13,253) (25,560) 100,200 (131,132) 209,655 492,493 1,965,000 8,434,286 326 OTHER EXPENSES AF 327 ALLOW FOR UNCOLLECTIBLES 328 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 329 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 330 OPEB 331 GREEN ENERGY PAYMENT TO DEMEC 175,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 310,000 639,110 833,000 1,200,000 128,600 DR 332 INTRAFUND SERVICE FEES 333 INTEREST ON DEPOSITS 334 INVENTORY WRITE OFFS 335 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS 336 POWER SUPPLY STUDY 337 DEBT SERVICE 338 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 339 TRANSFER TO 340 IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION (33,445) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (468,810) (327,255) ‐ 3,341,500 54,500 175,000 ‐ ‐ 3,589,890 10,271,600 3,500,000 341 GENERAL FUND ‐ 8,856,000 342 TRANSFER TO CONTINGENCY 301,070 301,070 343 TRANSFER TO PENSION COLA ‐ ‐ 344 TRANSFER TO DEPRECIATION RESERVE ‐ 1,250,000 345 TRANSFER FUTURE CAPACITY ‐ ‐ 346 RATE STABILIZATION RESERVE ‐ 1,300,000 347 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 301,070 15,207,070 348 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 738,732 10,947,900 350 TOTALS $ 1,046,978 $ 112,917,770 Page 9

351 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 352 ELECTRIC CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 353 CASH RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL 2010‐2011 354 INFO ONLY 355 2010‐11 2010‐11 356 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 357 CASH RECEIPTS 358 BEGINNING BALANCE $ ‐ $ 1 039 ,039,766 359 INTEREST EARNINGS ‐ 31,200 360 TRANSFER FROM INSURANCE STABILIZATION ‐ ‐ 361 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC REVENUE 301,070 301,070 363 TOTALS 301,070 1,372,036 364 365 EXPENDITURES 366 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC U C FUND ‐ 9,6 279,640 367 TRANSFER TO RATE STABILIZATION FUND ‐ ‐ 368 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 301,070 1,092,396 370 TOTALS $ 301,070 $ 1,372,036 T AF DR Page 10

371 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 372 ELECTRIC IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION FUND 373 CASH RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL 2010‐2011 374 INFO ONLY 375 2010‐11 2010‐11 376 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 377 CASH RECEIPTS 378 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ ‐ $ 3 429 ,429,624 379 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE BOND ‐ 415,585 380 INTEREST EARNINGS ‐ 40,700 381 INTEREST TRUSTEE ‐ ‐ 382 INCOME FROM SALE OF ASSETS ‐ ‐ 383 ELECTRIC NEW SERVICE FEES ‐ ‐ 384 RECEIPT FROM DEPRECIATION RESERVE ‐ ‐ 385 RECEIPT FROM U C FUTURE CAPACITY S RESERVE ‐ ‐ 386 DEMA GRANT ‐ ‐ 387 STATE REIMBURSEMENT FOR SR1 &SR9 ‐ ‐ 388 STATE REIMBURSEMENT FOR GOVS AVE ‐ 254,757 389 STATE REIMBURSEMENT WYOMING MILL RD 91,000 91,000 390 STATE GRANTS ‐ ‐ 391 FEDERAL GRANTS ‐ 135,152 392 INSURANCE CLAIM PROCEEDS ‐ 280,000 393 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC 395 TOTALS 396 397 EXPENDITURES T ‐ 91,000 3 500 ,500,000 8,146,818 AF 398 ELECTRIC GENERATION 399 TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION 400 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 401 ADMINISTRATION 402 METER READING 403 SYSTEMS OPERATIONS ‐ ‐ 91,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,106,427 739,000 1,740,295 ‐ ‐ ‐ DR 404 TRANSFER TO DEPRECIATION RESERVE 405 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 406 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE ‐BOND 408 TOTALS $ ‐ ‐ ‐ 91,000 $ 1,000,000 2,561,096 ‐ 8,146,818 Page 11

409 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 410 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND 411 CASH RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL 2010‐2011 412 INFO ONLY 413 2010‐11 2010‐11 414 LATEST EST ADJMTS REVISED 415 CASH RECEIPTS 416 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ ‐ $ 100,913 417 GRANTS REVENUE ‐ 1,000,000 418 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 25,000 325,000 419 INTEREST INCOME ‐ 2,800 421 TOTALS 25,000 1,428,713 422 423 EXPENDITURES 424 OG PROGRAM EXPENSES 25,000 ,3 1,325,000 425 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT ‐ ‐ 427 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE ‐ 103,713 429 TOTALS $ 25,000 $ 1,428,713 430 431 432 ADOPTED: * 433 434 Actions History T 435 Latest Estimate presented to Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee on 436 February 28, 2011 AF DR Page 12

CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED STAFF AMENDMENT #1 TO PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2011-07 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL 2 MET: 3 That Proposed Ordinance #2011-07 be amended by inserting the text indicated in bold, blue, italics and 4 deleting the text indicated in red strikeout as follows: Subsec. (d) Fire Signaling System Inspection Fee 5 Annual Fee - Five or less $25.00 each fire buildings per complex alarm system Certificate of Inspection 6 $15.00 each fire alarm system up to a maximum of twenty Annual Fee - More than Five (20) buildings. Buildings Per Complex Maximum fee per Exception: apartment or other complex not to multi-family dwelling - five (5) or exceed $300.00 for less buildings per complex fire alarm systems $25 each fire alarm system $15.00 each fire alarm system up to a Exception: apartment or other maximum of twenty multi-family dwelling - more (20) buildings. than five (5) buildings per Maximum fee per complex complex not to exceed $300.00 for fire alarm systems Subsec. (e) Fire Suppression System Inspection Fee 7 Annual Fee - Five or less $25.00 each fire buildings per complex suppression system Certificate of Inspection

Proposed SA#1 to Ordinance #2011-07 - Chapter 46, Article III, Section 46-126 Page 2 8 $15.00 each fire suppression system up to a maximum of Annual Fee - More than Five twenty (20) Buildings Per Complex buildings. Exception: apartment or other Maximum fee per multi-family dwelling - five (5) or complex not to less buildings per complex exceed $300.00 for fire suppression systems $25.00 each fire suppression system $15.00 each fire suppression system up to a maximum of Exception: apartment or other twenty (20) multi-family dwelling - more buildings. than five (5) buildings per Maximum fee per complex complex not to exceed $300.00 for fire suppression systems 9 10 ADOPTED: * 11 Actions History 12 March 14, 2011 - Introduced at Council 13 S:\ORDINANCES\2011\Draft\Ordinance 2011-07 SA1 - Ch. 46, Art. III, Sec. 46-126 - Fire Prevention Permit.wpd

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2011-07 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN 2 COUNCIL MET: 3 That Chapter 46 Fire Prevention and Protection, Article III - Fire Codes, Section 46-126 - Fire 4 Prevention Permit, be amended by inserting the text indicated in bold, blue, italics and deleting the 5 text indicated in red strikeout as follows: 6 Sec. 46-126. Fire prevention permit. 7 (a) Required. It shall be unlawful to construct, enlarge, alter or demolish a fire protection 8 system without obtaining a fire prevention permit. 9 (b) Fee. Each applicant for a fire prevention permit, including, but not limited to, sprinkler 10 systems, fire alarms, hood suppression units, and tank installation, shall pay unto the city a permit 11 fee as provided for in Appendix F - Fees and Fines, before such permit shall be issued. 12 (c) Reinspections. There will be no charge for the first reinspection of a permit. The 13 applicant shall pay a fee for subsequent reinspections as provided for in Appendix F--Fees and Fines. 14 (d) Fire Signaling System Inspection Fee. For each inspection of a fire alarm signaling 15 system located within the jurisdiction of the City of Dover, and conducted by a licensed company 16 pursuant to Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, the licensed company shall submit a 17 copy of the certificate of inspection for each fire alarm system to the City of Dover Fire Marshals 18 Office, along with a non-refundable fee as provided for in Appendix F - Fees and Fines. 19 (e) Fire Suppression System Inspection Fee. For each inspection of a fire suppression 20 system located within the jurisdiction of the City of Dover and conducted by a licensed company 21 pursuant to Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations the licensed company shall submit a 22 copy of the certificate of inspection for each sprinkler riser to the City of Dover Fire Marshals 23 Office, along with a non-refundable fee as provided for in Appendix F - Fees and Fines. 24 (d) (f) Doubling of fees. Fees established in subsection (b) of this section shall be doubled 25 in the event that a permit is applied for after construction has commenced without the permission 26 of the fire marshal. The fire marshal shall waive the doubling of fees in cases where the permit 27 applicant is not a professional contractor and the work is not being done by a professional contractor. 28 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT: 29 Appendix F - Fees and Fines, Chapter 46 - Fire Prevention and Protection, Article III - Fire Codes, 30 be amended by inserting the text indicated in bold, blue, italics, as follows:

Proposed Ordinance #2011-07 - Chapter 46, Article III, Section 46-126 Page 2 31 Chapter 46 - Fire Prevention and Protection, Article III - Fire Codes 32 Fees established in subsection (b) of this section shall be doubled in the event that a permit is 33 applied for after construction has commenced without the permission of the fire marshal. The fire 34 marshal shall waive the doubling of fees in cases where the permit applicant is not a professional 35 contractor and the work is not being done by a professional contractor. 36 Sec. 46-126 Fire Prevention Permit $12.00 for each $1,000.00 of costs or multiple thereof of Fee; Each applicant for a fire prevention the fire protection Subsec. (b) permit system; provided that a minimum fee for each permit shall be $50.00 Subsec. (c) Reinspection 37 First reinspection No charge 38 Second reinspection $25.00 39 Third reinspection $50.00 40 Any subsequent reinspection $100.00 Subsec. (d) Fire Signaling System Inspection Fee 41 Annual Fee - Five or less $25.00 each fire buildings per complex alarm system 42 $15.00 each fire alarm system up to a maximum of twenty Annual Fee - More than Five (20) buildings. Buildings Per Complex Maximum fee per complex not to exceed $300.00 for fire alarm systems Subsec. (e) Fire Suppression System Inspection Fee

Proposed Ordinance #2011-07 - Chapter 46, Article III, Section 46-126 Page 3 43 Annual Fee - Five or less $25.00 each fire buildings per complex suppression system 44 $15.00 each fire suppression system up to a maximum of twenty (20) Annual Fee - More than Five buildings. Buildings Per Complex Maximum fee per complex not to exceed $300.00 for fire suppression systems 45 Fines not paid within 14 days of the day the fine was issued, including the day the fine was issued, 46 shall be automatically doubled in amount. 47 48 ADOPTED: * 49 SYNOPSIS 50 Delaware State Fire Prevention regulations require periodic inspections, testing, and 51 maintenance of fire alarm signaling, fire suppression, and any other fire protection 52 systems, devices, and equipment in accordance with the National Fire Protection 53 Association’s Fire Codes and Standards. This amendment would enable the City to 54 collect an administration fee for processing the required Certificates of Inspection. 55 Actions History 56 March 14, 2011 Scheduled for First Reading 57 February 23, 2011 - Considered by the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee 58 S:\ORDINANCES\2011\Draft\Ordinance 2011-07 Ch. 46, Art. III, Sec. 46-126 - Fire Prevention Permit - 1st Rdg.wpd