packet

UTILITY COMMITTEE AGENDA February 14, 2011 - 5:00 P.M. - Council Chambers - City Hall - City of Dover Public comments are welcomed on any item and will be permitted at appropriate times. When possible, please notify the City Clerk (736-7008 or e-m ail at CityClerk@dover.de.us) should you wish to be recognized. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS 1. Green Energy Fund Grant Modification 2. Retail Customer Demand Response Tariff Modification 3. Amendments to Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) Legislation 4. Review of Utility Related Capital Investment Plan (CIP) (Electric and Water/Wastewater) (December) 5. Adjournment by 5:55 P.M. /tm S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Agendas\2011\02-14-2011 UTILITY.wpd THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Utility Committee AGENDA ITEM NO.: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Utilities – Electric DATE SUBMITTED: 1-24-11 PREPARED BY: Ron Lunt, Public Utilities Director SUBJECT: Green Energy Fund Grant Modification REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: City Manager EXHIBITS: Dover Green Energy Fund Incentive/Grant Proposed Changes and Sample Grant Calculations EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: N/A AMOUNT BUDGETED: N/A FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): TIME TABLE: Effective upon Council Approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends adopting the “Dover Green Energy Fund Incentive/Grant Proposed Changes” outlined in the exhibit and funding Non-Profit applications at the same levels/caps as Non- Residential applications. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Approximately five years ago the State of Delaware adopted The Delaware Energy Act which includes a Green Energy Fund Program whereby electric customers of the City of Dover contribute funds to the program to financially support the installation of renewable energy resources and promote the use of energy efficiency technologies. This program is administered by the Delaware Municipal Electric Corporation (DEMEC) for the municipal providers in the state, including the City of Dover. Within this Green Energy Fund Program there are Grant limits (percentage of payment and total payment) for the installation of qualifying technologies. DEMEC has suggested that the City of Dover modify the percentage of the grant payments, the total grant limits, and in the case of the Geothermal Heat Pumps, increase the efficiency standards. These modifications will assist in the goal of ensuring that funds are available for the most potential Grant requesting parties. Currently Dover has a backlog of approximately 1.5 years. On December 10, 2010, Delmarva Power and Delaware Electric Cooperative modified their grant programs similar to the attached recommendation. DEMEC recommended the proposed changes as outlined in the exhibit with staff recommending two major variances. The first variation is in the Photovoltaic Systems whereby Non-Profit applicants would be provided grants at the same level as Non-Residential and the second is related to Fuel Cells and again provides a grant percentage calculation (20%) the same as both residential and non-residential. Staff’s reasoning for this deviation is that there are many non-profit entities in Dover because we are a state capital with many schools and colleges, and due to the backlog of applications it was felt this was the most equitable to treat all non-residential groups the same. Additionally, the non-profit group was recently identified by Delmarva Power as a separate group in the December, 2010, modification; prior to this they were identified the same as non-residential. The attached exhibit, Dover Green Energy Fund Incentive/Grant Proposed Changes, includes the proposed changes in red text on the first line of each Grant System; the second line includes the current program guidelines. There are two yellow boxes that identify the suggested deviations from the DEMEC recommendation for the reasons outlined above. It should also be noted that the system qualifications have been modified to better reflect the value of the installation. For example the Photovoltaic and Small Wind Turbine grants are now based on output instead of installation cost to incentivize the installation of more efficient systems and are these systems are now limited to a maximum size of 50 kW. The same principle applies to the Solar Water Heater and Geothermal Heat Pumps, the more efficient system receive larger grants or qualify for these grants. The least efficient Geothermal Heat Pumps (previous units with EER ratings of 14) would be eliminated from the program; this is due in part to the advancements of technology. Lastly, Fuel Cells percentages of costs limits are being reduced to provide more equity between the system options. To further encourage conservation it will be a requirement of residential customers to complete a City of Dover Public Utilities Residential Utility Service Audit which may be scheduled by calling 736-7070. All non-residential applicants shall have an energy audit completed by a prequalified commercial auditor, a listing of which can be found at www.energizedelaware.org/businessallies. The expense of this audit will be the sole responsibility of the applicant and the listing is maintained by Delaware’s Sustainable Energy Utility. This requirement is also included in the Green Energy Program requirements administered for the Delmarva Power Customers.

Dover Green Energy Fund Incentive/Grant Proposed Changes Photovoltaic Systems Not to Exceed Residential & __% of total Non-Residential Non-Profit Maximum Grant installed costs Cost ($/Watt) Cost ($/Watt) Cost ($/Watt) Cost ($/Watt) Cost ($/Watt) Cost ($/Watt) 0+ to 5kW 5+kW to 10kW 10+kW to 50kW 0+ to 5kW 5+kW to 10kW 10+kW to 50kW Residential Non-Residential Non-Profit Dover (Proposed) N/A $ 1.25 $ 0.75 $ 0.35 $ 1.25 $ 0.75 $ 0.35 $7,500 $15,000 $15,000 Dover (Current) 25% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $7,500 $15,000 $15,000 DEMEC recommended limits are: $ 2.55 $ 1.50 $ 0.70 Solar Water Heater Only Not to Exceed Residential Non-Residential Non-Profit Maximum Grant __% of total ($/OG300 - ($/OG300 - or PE ($/OG300 - or PE installed costs kWhr Saved) Cal. kWhr Saved) Cal. kWhr Saved) Residential Non-Residential Non-Profit Dover (Proposed) N/A $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $2,500 $7,500 $7,500 Dover (Current) 50% N/A N/A N/A $3,000 $10,000 $10,000 Solar Water Heating Integrated into a Radiant Heating Application Not to Exceed Residential Non-Residential Non-Profit Maximum Grant __% of total ($/OG300 - ($/OG300 - ($/OG300 - installed costs kWhr Saved) kWhr Saved) kWhr Saved) Residential Non-Residential Non-Profit Dover (Proposed) N/A $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $2,500 $7,500 $7,500 Dover (Current) 50% N/A N/A N/A $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 Small Wind Turbines Residential & Not to Exceed Non-Residential Non-Profit Maximum Grant __% of total Cost ($/Watt) Cost ($/Watt) Cost ($/Watt) Cost ($/Watt) Cost ($/Watt) Cost ($/Watt) installed costs 0+ to 5kW 5+kW to 10kW 10+kW to 50kW 0+ to 5kW 5+kW to 10kW 10+kW to 50kW Residential Non-Residential Non-Profit Dover (Proposed) N/A $ 1.25 $ 0.75 $ 0.35 $ 1.25 $ 0.75 $ 0.35 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 Dover (Current) 33.3% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $7,500 $15,000 $15,000 Fuel Cells Not to Exceed Maximum Grant __% of total installed costs Residential Non-Residential Non-Profit Dover (Proposed) 20% $7,500 $10,000 $10,000 Dover (Current) 50% $15,000 $30,000 $30,000 DEMEC recommend increasing the limit to 35% of the installed costs for Non-Profit Geothermal Heat Pumps System - Dover (Proposed) - w/ Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) ≥ 18 and Coefficient of Performance (COP) of ≥ 3.6 Dover (Current) - w/ Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) of 15.0 and Coefficient of Performance (COP) of 3.4 or greater Residential & Non-Residential Non-Profit Not to Exceed First Over First Over Maximum Grant __% of total 2 Tons 2 Tons 2 Tons 2 Tons installed costs ($/Ton) ($/Ton) ($/Ton) ($/Ton) Residential Non-Residential Non-Profit Dover (Proposed) N/A $ 800 $ 700 $ 800 $ 700 $3,000 $10,000 $10,000 Dover (Current) $600 per ton or 50% of total installed costs, whichever is lower $3,000 $20,000 $20,000 Dover (Proposed) - ELIMINATE THIS PROGRAM Dover (Current): Geothermal Heat Pumps System - w/ Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) of 14.0 and Coefficient of Performance (COP) of 3.0 or greater Not to Exceed Not to Exceed Not to Exceed __% of total For for installed costs Residential Non-Residential $500 per ton or 50% of total installed costs, Dover (Current) $2,500 $20,000 whichever is lower Yellow cells are highlighting the recommended differences between Dover's program and DEMEC's recommendation. Red text indicates the proposed changes to Dover's program. Draft only

SAMPLE GRANT CALCULATIONS Residential Photovoltaic System ‐ 7.5 kW or 7,500 watts Watts Incentive Total Incentive First 5000 watts Incentive 5,000 $1.25 $6,250.00 Second 2500 watts Incentive 2,500 $0.75 $1,875.00 Total Incentive $8,125.00 Applicant Recieves Maximum Grant Payment $7,500.00 Residential Solar Hot Water System SRCC OG‐300 Energy Savings Prediction = 2968 kWh Saved Annually kWh Incentive Total Incentive kWh Savings 2,968 $1.00 $2,968.00 Total Incentive $2,968.00 Applicant Recieves Maximum Grant Payment $2,500.00 Non‐Residential Photovoltaic System ‐ 30 kW Watts Incentive Total Incentive First 5,000 watts Incentive 5,000 $1.25 $6,250.00 Second 5,000 watts Incentive 5,000 $0.75 $3,750.00 Greater than 10,000 watts 20,000 $0.35 $7,000.00 Total Incentive $17,000.00 Applicant Recieves Maximum Grant Payment $15,000.00 Residential Geothermal System ‐ 5.0 Ton System ‐ EER 18 Tons Incentive Total Incentive First 2 Tons Incentive 2 $800.00 $1,600.00 Next 3 Tons Incentive 3 $700.00 $2,100.00 Total Incentive $3,700.00 Applicant Recieves Maximum Grant Payment $3,000.00 Non‐Residential Geothermal System ‐ 15.0 Ton System ‐ EER 18 Tons Incentive Total Incentive First 2 Tons Incentive 2 $800.00 $1,600.00 Next 3 Tons Incentive 13 $700.00 $9,100.00 Total Incentive $10,700.00 Applicant Recieves Maximum Grant Payment $10,000.00

ACTION FORM U U PROCEEDING: Utility Committee AGENDA ITEM: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Utilities DATE SUBMITTED: 1/24/11 PREPARED BY: Ron Lunt, Public Utilities Director SUBJECT: Retail Customer Demand Response Tariff Modification REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: City Manager EXHIBITS: Redline Tariff and Proposed Final Tariff EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A AMOUNT BUDGETED: $ N/A FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): TIMETABLE: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the adoption of the modifications to the tariff titled Retail Customer Demand Response Tariff. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS In 2009 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FREC) issued Order No. 719 which attempted in part to remove barriers to demand response programs operated by Regional Transmission Organizations such as PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM). Of specific interest to the City of Dover was a requirement that utilities selling less than four million MWh’s must have the relevant electric retail regulatory authority (City Council) approve the participation of their retail customers in the program. Council affirmed this intent and created a tariff titled Retail Customer Demand Response to document that the City of Dover affirms participation in this program on February 22, 2010. The tenets of the PJM operated Demand Response Program (DRP) are to compensate customers that reduce their consumption during periods of tight energy supply or high usage. The reduction of load also ensures electric grid reliability and helps alleviate costs associated with new generation plants and transmission upgrades. Both of which are a concern on the Delmarva Peninsula. As provided in the exhibits, staff is recommending that Dover, or its authorized designee, will be the only DRP authorized to administer this program in Dover electric territory. Currently staff intends to designate DEMEC as its authorized designee. The reason for the modification to a single provider is twofold: A) DEMEC solicited proposals from five different providers and the proposal selected provided the greatest return to the customer (80% return to customer, 20% retainage for operations), B) Dover could call on its customers to reduce load during local system emergencies and/or in an effort to reduce load during Dover peaks, utilizing this procedure as a local demand response program which could reduce future capacity expenses. In calendar year 2010, nine customers participated in the DSP through various Curtailment Service Providers’ that are registered with PJM. These customers will be notified of the change in the tariff and would transition into the DEMEC program within one year. The proposed tariff has been reviewed by the City of Dover attorney, Kirk Betts, Betts and Holt, and he approves this tariff in its final form.

RETAIL CUSTOMER DEMAND RESPONSE AVAILABILITY The Dover Electric Utility (“Dover”) or its authorized designee is the sole entity permitted to bid demand response directly into the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (“PJM”) (“DR Program”) on behalf of retail customers served by Dover. Customers served by Dover that intend to bid their DR into PJM prior to that date may do so, provided that such participation conforms to the terms and conditions in this tariff. No Customer may participate in a DR program of any other entity unless such entity is a licensed Third Party Demand Response Provider (“DR Provider”)unless such program is consistent with the terms and condition in this tariff and approved in advance by Dover. Dover or its authorized designee may allow a Customer to bid DR into PJM’s ancillary services market for energy imbalance, spinning reserves, supplemental reserves, reactive power and voltage control, or regulation and frequency response ancillary services, subject to the same terms and conditions. DR programs may reduce electric service costs for the Customer, provide enhanced usage data, reduce emissions from electric generation, and provide demand flexibility. CONTENTS OF APPLICATION A Customer shall submit to Dover a written request to participate that includes the following: 1) Copy of DR Provider license or certification and a contract between the DR Provider and Customer; 2) Name Type of the DR program; and and evidence of regulatory approval; 3) 2)Metering requirements for participation.; and 4) The DR contract must include the following provision: “This contract shall terminate without penalty on no less than one year’s written notice from Dover to the Customer stating that Dover or its authorized designee will assume DR Program management.” Dover’s approval of the application shall be granted within fourteen (14) days. EFFECT OF APPLICATION AND PARTICIPATION IN DR PROGRAM Dover’s receipt and review of any documentation submitted by a Customer shall not constitute approval of such DR Provider or a guarantee of performance or payment by a DR Provider, nor shall Dover be liable for ANY damages sustained by the Customer. RIGHT TO TERMINATE PARTICIPATION IN DR PROGRAM Dover reserves the right to disapprove a request to participate in a DR program or to terminate participation by a Customer when, in Dover’s sole discretion, Dover determines that participation by the Customer will be detrimental to another customer or to the City of Dover. SPECIAL METERING REQUIREMENTS If Customer requires special metering equipment or devices to participate in the DR program, Customer shall provide the specifications for such equipment or devices in writing to the Dover Electric Department at the time of application or promptly thereafter. Within fourteen (14) days thereafter, Dover will provide the Customer with an estimate of the cost of the special metering equipment or devices and an estimate of the cost of providing special meter reading data. The cost of any special metering equipment or device shall be the responsibility of the Customer and shall be paid prior to the scheduled installation date. All costs for data or special readings shall be billed to Customer monthly. Effective Date: February 22, 2010__________, 2011

RETAIL CUSTOMER DEMAND RESPONSE AVAILABILITY The Dover Electric Utility (“Dover”) or its authorized designee is the sole entity permitted to bid demand response directly into the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (“PJM”) (“DR Program”) on behalf of retail customers served by Dover. No Customer may participate in a DR program of any other entity unless such program is consistent with the terms and conditions in this tariff and approved in advance by Dover. Dover or its authorized designee may allow a Customer to bid DR into PJM’s ancillary services market for energy imbalance, spinning reserves, supplemental reserves, reactive power and voltage control, or regulation and frequency response ancillary services, subject to the same terms and conditions. DR programs may reduce electric service costs for the Customer, provide enhanced usage data, reduce emissions from electric generation, and provide demand flexibility. CONTENTS OF APPLICATION Customer shall submit to Dover a written request to participate that includes the following: 1) Type of DR program; and 2) Metering requirements for participation. Dover’s approval of the application shall be granted within fourteen (14) days. EFFECT OF APPLICATION AND PARTICIPATION IN DR PROGRAM Dover’s receipt and review of any documentation submitted by a Customer shall not constitute approval of such DR Provider or a guarantee of performance or payment by a DR Provider, nor shall Dover be liable for ANY damages sustained by the Customer. RIGHT TO TERMINATE PARTICIPATION IN DR PROGRAM Dover reserves the right to disapprove a request to participate in a DR program or to terminate participation by Customer when, in Dover’s sole discretion, Dover determines that participation by Customer will be detrimental to another customer or to the City of Dover. SPECIAL METERING REQUIREMENTS If Customer requires special metering equipment or devices to participate in the DR program, Customer shall provide the specifications for such equipment or devices in writing to the Dover Electric Department at the time of application or promptly thereafter. Within fourteen (14) days thereafter, Dover will provide the Customer with an estimate of the cost of the special metering equipment or devices and an estimate of the cost of providing special meter reading data. The cost of any special metering equipment or device shall be the responsibility of the Customer and shall be paid prior to the scheduled installation date. All costs for data or special readings shall be billed to Customer monthly. Effective Date: __________ ___, 2011

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Utility Committee DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Manager’s Office DATE SUBMITTED: 2/3/2011 PREPARED BY: Anthony J. DePrima, City Manager SUBJECT: Amendments to Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) Legislation REFERENCE: RELATED PROJECT: N/A REVIEWED BY: City Manager EXHIBITS: Proposed RPS Legislation Amendment TIMETABLE: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor and Council President to write a letter in support for the RPS Legislation Amendment. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS In 2010, the Delaware Legislatures amended the Renewable Power Supply (RPS) Legislation by requiring municipally owned Electric Utilities to develop plans for including renewable power sources in their power supply portfolios by 2014. The amount of renewable power sources will have to be compatible with the standards set for Delmarva Power. By 2014 Delmarva Power will have to have 11.5% of their power from renewable sources. Then by 2025 it will be ramped up to 25%. The proposed amendment would allow municipalities to include and count conservation, energy efficiency and demand-side management programs in their RPS plans. Staff believes that conservation, energy efficiency, and demand-side management programs are just as important as renewable energy sources. In addition, a credit for these efforts should be counted. In general these kinds of programs are more cost effective than renewable energy sources at this time.

SPONSOR: Rep. Scott HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 146th GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE BILL NO. AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 26 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO STANDARDS. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE: 1 Section 1. Amend §363(a), Title 26 of the Delaware Code by adding a new sentence at the end of the subsection 2 as follows: 3 “For purposes of this section, a comparable program may include eligible energy resources and energy and 4 capacity savings which result from the implementation of conservation, energy efficiency, and demand-side programs. 5 These units must be quantifiable through an appropriate evaluation, measurement and verification protocol and measured in 6 Megawatt-hours of energy saved or Megawatts of capacity avoided.”. SYNOPSIS This Act will permit municipal electric companies and rural electric cooperatives that elect to develop and implement a program comparable to the State’s renewable energy portfolio standards (“RPS”) to utilize conservation, energy efficiency and demand-side management programs, in addition to renewable energy resources, to achieve RPS compliance. Conservation, efficiency and demand-side management programs meet or exceed many of the positive attributes associated with renewable energy resources. Such measures are non-polluting, non-invasive to the environment, cost efficient, economically sustainable and mitigate the need for new power plant construction. Page 1 of 1 HD : WGB : CMG 4141460019

City of Dover Capital Investment Plan Project Tracking Report December 31, 2010 Points to Remember - * Original Project Budget = Original Total Project Budget initially included in approved annual budget. * Latest Project Budget = Revised Total Project Budget included in most recent approved annual budget or one of the following: bond resolution, revolving fund loan agreement, Council approved budget amendment, or City Manager approved amendment as per the Budget Amendment Procedure. * Current Fiscal Year - Revised Fiscal Year Budget = Current Year approved project budgets plus carry forward balances of unspent budgets in the prior fiscal year. Project Carry Forward balances will be submitted to City Council for amendment in January 2010. Can also be amended with City Manager approval per the Budget Amendment Procedure. * Water Quality, Inflow/Infiltration, Distribution Upgrades and New Development projects are budgeted as a blanket project and once individual projects are identified and estimated they are created using an allocation of the overall budgeted amount. Examples are Water Quality - Walker Road; New Developments - CVS, McDonald's, Wawa; Distribution Upgrades - Greenview; * Status and Comments provided by City Manager. * For Finance purposes projects are considered completed when placed in service and all charges have been processed. Community Water & Total Current Year Budget Funding Sources General Transportation Wastewater Electric CIP Budget Balance $ 113,156 $ - $ - $ - $ 113,156 Project Carry Forward Balances 88,083 - 953,238 850,736 2,729,628 Federal and/or State Grants 4,250,348 1,000,000 45,248 135,152 5,430,748 New Revolving Fund Loans - - 863,060 - 863,060 Carry Forward Construction Loan Balances - - 8,001,973 254,757 8,256,730 Bond Proceeds - - - 415,585 415,585 Impact Fees - - 758,821 - 758,821 Income from Sale of Assets - - - - - Parkland Reserve 36,872 - - - 36,872 Library Reserve & Contributions 3,363,732 - - 3,363,732 Transfer from Operating Funds 1,019,629 300,000 58,709 2,797,792 4,176,130 Interest Earned 10,900 - - 40,700 51,600 Total Funding Sources (Unaudited) $ 8,882,720 $ 1,300,000 $ 10,681,049 $ 4,494,722 $ 26,196,062 Page 1 of 5

City of Dover General Fund - Major CIP Projects December, 2010 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project Current Revised Fiscal Project Project To Date Budget % Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD % Budget Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY2009 Bid Pack A - constuction started / 2 M/G New Library Project $ 18,200,000 $ 24,679,934 $ 1,252,237 $ 23,427,697 5.1% $ 6,687,039 $ 7,630,663 $ 515,171 6.8% Started Bid Pack B - bidding started. 3 Totals - FY09 $ 18,200,000 $ 24,679,934 $ 1,252,237 $ 23,427,697 5.1% $ 6,687,039 $ 7,630,663 $ 515,171 6.8% 4 5 FY2010 6 Pitts Center Addition 50,000 40,000 28,629 11,371 71.6% - 36,872 25,501 69.2% Complete Complete. 7 Totals - FY10 $ 50,000 $ 40,000 $ 28,629 $ 11,371 71.6% $ - $ 36,872 $ 25,501 69.2% 8 9 FY2011 10 Vehicles & Equipment $ 63,675 $ 63,675 $ 205,564 $ (141,889) 322.8% $ 735,185 $ 735,185 $ 205,564 28.0% Started Vehicles being ordered. Core Law Enforcement Server 11 Replacement - 53,500 - 53,500 0.0% - 53,500 - 0.0% Started Specifications done. 12 Playground Improv Program - 15,000 12,952 2,048 86.3% 15,000 15,000 12,952 86.3% Complete BB Courts paved. 13 Skate Park - 30,000 - 30,000 0.0% 30,000 30,000 - 0.0% Not Started In discussions with equipment provider 14 Concrete Program 50,000 50,000 45,759 4,241 91.5% 50,000 50,000 45,759 91.5% Started Complete with contractor portion. 15 Transfer to CT Fund 300,000 300,000 300,000 - 0.0% 300,000 300,000 300,000 100.0% Started Transfer to Com Transp Fund - December. 16 Downtown Security Cameras 31,500 31,500 - 31,500 0.0% 31,500 31,500 - 0.0% Started Contract signed 17 Totals - FY11 $ 445,175 $ 543,675 $ 564,275 $ (20,600) 103.8% $ 1,161,685 $ 1,215,185 $ 564,275 46.4% 18 19 Grand Totals $ 18,695,175 $ 25,263,609 $ 1,845,141 $ 23,418,468 7.3% $ 7,848,724 $ 8,882,720 $ 1,104,947 12.4% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is re-budgeted to start over each fiscal year. G = Grant funded project Page 2 of 5

City of Dover Community Transportation & General Fund Street Funds - Major CIP Projects December, 2010 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project Current Revised Fiscal Project Project To Date Budget % Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD % Budget Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY 2006 2 M Lincoln Park Center $ 400,000 $ 479,148 $ 415,223 $ 63,925 86.7% $ 121,891 $ 121,891 $ 57,966 47.6% Started Ongoing. 3 Totals $ 400,000 $ 479,148 $ 415,223 $ 63,925 86.7% $ 121,891 $ 121,891 $ 57,966 47.6% 4 5 FY 2007 6 E. Water Street Brick $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - $ 65,000 0.0% $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - 0.0% Specialty contract needed. 7 Totals $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - $ 65,000 0.0% $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - 0.0% 8 9 FY 2009 Trying to move this to Library Project if 10 Schutte Parking Lot $ 21,950 $ 21,950 $ - $ 21,950 0.0% $ 21,950 $ 21,950 $ - 0.0% State approves. 11 Turnberry Drive 40,000 40,000 40,000 - 100.0% 40,000 40,000 40,000 100.0% Curb work complete, paving in process. 12 Totals $ 61,950 $ 61,950 $ 40,000 $ 21,950 64.6% $ 61,950 $ 61,950 $ 40,000 64.6% 13 14 FY 2011 15 Washington Street $ 105,000 $ 105,000 $ 104,000 $ 1,000 99.0% $ 105,000 $ 105,000 $ 104,000 99.0% Complete. 16 Mitschner Road (incl. CDBG) 169,066 169,066 246,672 (77,606) 145.9% 169,066 169,066 246,672 145.9% In progress. 17 Delaware Ave 6,250 6,250 6,250 - 100.0% 6,250 6,250 6,250 100.0% Complete. 18 Oak Road Signage 11,875 11,875 10,375 1,500 87.4% 11,875 11,875 10,375 87.4% Just received. 19 Street & Alley Program 300,000 300,000 175,926 124,074 58.6% 300,000 300,000 175,926 58.6% In progress. 20 State Agreements not yet rec'd 458,968 458,968 - 458,968 0.0% 458,968 458,968 - 0.0% Agreements have not been received. 21 Totals $ 1,051,159 $ 1,051,159 $ 543,223 $ 507,936 51.7% $ 1,051,159 $ 1,051,159 $ 543,223 51.7% 22 23 Grand Totals $ 1,578,109 $ 1,657,257 $ 998,446 $ 658,811 60.2% $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 641,189 49.3% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is rebudgeted to start over each fiscal year. Page 3 of 5

City of Dover Water/Wastewater Improvement & Extension Fund - Major CIP Projects December, 2010 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project % Approved Revised Fiscal % Project Project To Date Budget Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD Budget Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY 2008 2 South Governors Ave. Water Main Upgrade $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 2,664 $ 197,336 1.3% $ - $ 197,336 $ - 0.0% Complete Done. 3 M 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tower 4,196,600 2,590,000 11,062 2,578,938 0.4% - 193,377 4,439 2.3% Started Selecting Tank Model & Site; FY11 = Constr. 4 M Piney Point Well 398,800 665,000 61,414 603,586 9.2% - 162,525 8,939 5.5% Started DNREC permiting; FY11 = Constr. 5 M South Governors Ave. Sewer Main 300,000 291,000 13,561 277,439 4.7% - 279,244 1,805 0.6% Complete Done. 6 M/SL US 13 East Sanitary Sewer Interceptor 2,376,800 3,409,641 2,429,610 980,031 71.3% - 2,335,862 1,561,448 66.8% Complete Functionally completed, some minor site restoration. 7 Totals - FY08 $ 7,472,200 $ 7,155,641 $ 2,518,311 $ 4,637,330 35.2% $ - $ 3,168,344 $ 1,576,631 49.8% 8 9 FY2009 10 M/SL Bayard Avenue $ 590,910 $ 590,910 $ 11,288 $ 579,622 1.9% $ - $ 584,420 $ 4,798 0.8% Started Material ordered. 11 M/SL East side N. State Street 868,707 877,596 176,913 700,683 20.2% - 847,700 147,910 17.4% Done Done. 12 M/SL Route 13 Water Main 1,058,700 1,035,898 137,256 898,642 13.2% - 967,801 13,259 1.4% Started Goig to bid 13 R Water Quality Improvements FY09 $ 2,518,317 $ 2,504,404 $ 325,457 $ 2,178,947 13.0% $ - $ 2,399,921 $ 165,968 19.6% Started 14 15 M/SL DE State University Pumping Station Repl. $ 386,400 $ 386,400 $ 293,367 $ 93,033 75.9% - 240,324 147,652 61.4% Completed Done. 16 M/SL Fox Hall/Retreat Force Main Rerouting 133,100 139,245 238,789 (99,544) 171.5% - - 20,351 0.0% Completed Done. Overage covered by US 13 Interceptor. 17 M/SL Acorn Lane Pump Station Replace. 386,400 386,400 293,209 93,191 75.9% - 210,528 117,698 55.9% Completed Done. 18 Totals - FY09 $ 3,424,217 $ 3,416,449 $ 1,150,822 $ 2,265,627 33.7% $ - $ 2,850,773 $ 451,670 15.8% 19 20 FY2010 21 R Remote Control & Monitor Wells $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 23,104 $ 31,896 42.0% $ - $ 31,896 $ - 0.0% Started Material Ordered 22 M/SL Inflow/Infiltration Removal 1,800,000 1,799,668 6,369 1,793,299 0.4% - 1,798,447 5,148 0.3% Started Pre-construction inspections ongoing. 23 M Fox Hall Pump Station 427,900 52,000 30,286 21,714 58.2% 375,900 426,044 28,430 6.7% Started DNREC review. 24 M Heatherfield Force Main Rerouting 220,400 40,000 31,511 8,489 78.8% 229,200 267,916 30,227 11.3% Started DNREC review. 25 I Tar Ditch Interceptor Upgrade 518,230 518,230 7,851 510,379 1.5% - 516,781 6,402 1.2% Started Reviewing design. 26 Various Pump Motor Replacements 45,248 45,248 - 45,248 0.0% - 45,248 - 0.0% Started Grant approved. Ordering begun. 27 Totals - FY10 $ 3,066,778 $ 2,510,146 $ 99,121 $ 2,411,025 3.9% $ 605,100 $ 3,086,332 $ 70,207 2.3% 28 29 FY2011 30 Misc. Distribution System Upgrade $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 60,000 0.0% $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - 0.0% Started On-going as needed. 31 Wellhead Redevelopement Program 60,000 60,000 - 60,000 0.0% 60,000 60,000 - 0.0% Started Council for approval. 32 Water Quality Improvements 500,000 500,000 - 500,000 0.0% 500,000 500,000 250 0.1% Not Started See above FY09. 33 M/SL Inflow/Infiltration Removal 500,000 500,000 - 500,000 0.0% 500,000 500,000 - 0.0% Started Will start after FY10 is done. 34 R Scada Technology Equip Upgrade 82,100 82,100 43,600 38,500 53.1% 82,100 82,100 43,600 53.1% Started Installation starting. 35 Del State/Del Tech Force Main Rerouting 286,500 286,500 3,801 282,699 1.3% 286,500 286,500 3,801 1.3% Done Shifted completion to interceptor. 36 Lepore Road Pump Station Replacement 52,000 52,000 6,548 45,452 12.6% 52,000 52,000 6,548 12.6% Started Design with Braun.. 37 R Misc. Sewer System Improvements 35,000 35,000 35,152 (152) 100.4% 35,000 35,000 35,152 100.4% Started Ongoing as needed. 38 Totals - FY11 $ 1,575,600 $ 1,575,600 $ 89,101 $ 1,486,499 5.7% $ 1,575,600 $ 1,575,600 $ 89,351 5.7% 39 40 Grand Totals $ 15,538,795 $ 14,657,836 $ 3,857,355 $ 10,800,481 26.3% $ 2,180,700 $ 10,681,049 $ 2,187,858 20.5% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is rebudgeted to start over each fiscal year. SL = State Loan Project - construction phase is financed I = Impact Fee Financed Project Page 4 of 5

City of Dover Electric Improvement & Extension Fund - Major CIP Projects December, 2010 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project % Current Revised Fiscal % Project Project To Date Budget Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD Budget Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY 2006 2 M/B 69 KV feeders 3 and 4 $ 11,060,000 $ 8,693,782 $ 8,761,762 $ (67,980) 100.8% $ - $ 4,242 $ 4,242 100.0% Completed In service. 3 M/S Governor's Avenue Rebuild 1,268,450 2,068,260 550,725 1,517,535 26.6% - 250,000 30,264 12.1% Completed Done. 4 Totals - FY06 $ 12,328,450 $ 10,762,042 $ 9,312,486 $ 1,449,556 86.5% $ - $ 254,242 $ 34,506 13.6% 5 6 FY 2008 7 Unit 3 Turb Bearing Fire Protect Deluge $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 44,720 $ 5,280 89.4% $ - $ 50,000 $ 44,720 89.4% Completed Final training needed. 8 Totals - FY08 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 44,720 $ 5,280 89.4% $ - $ 50,000 $ 44,720 89.4% 9 10 FY2010 11 B Vansant CT Mark IV Control (Replmnt) $ 700,000 $ 610,000 $ 438,687 $ 171,313 71.9% $ - $ 202,363 $ 152,050 75.1% Completed In service. 12 B McKee Run Entrance Road 240,000 240,000 154,722 85,278 64.5% - 154,244 154,244 100.0% Completed In service. 13 Work Mgmt. System Replacement 85,000 85,000 26,577 58,423 31.3% - - 9,859 0.0% Completed Done. 14 Photovoltaic Install @ McKee Run - - 65,065 (65,065) 0.0% - 65,065 65,065 100.0% Completed In service. 15 M/B Mid City Substation 1,488,461 993,711 975,819 17,892 98.2% - 1,087 1,087 100.0% Completed In service. 16 S LED Lighting Replacement 70,087 70,087 70,010 77 99.9% - 70,087 70,010 99.9% Completed Installed on Division. 17 B Crossgates 396,904 543,075 524,391 18,684 96.6% - - 1,440 0.0% Completed Done. Done. This project is over budget due to having addtiional bond 18 B Buchanan Acres 406,000 865,144 1,207,967 (342,823) 139.6% - 53,648 129,502 241.4% Completed proceeds to spend. 19 20 Totals - FY10 $ 3,386,452 $ 3,407,017 $ 3,463,238 $ (56,221) 101.7% $ - $ 546,494 $ 583,257 106.7% 21 22 FY2011 23 V hi ehicles & E i quipment $ 1 8 58,200 $ 1 8 58,200 $ 113,437 $ 44,763 1 71.7% $ 1 8 58,200 $ 1 8 58,200 $ 113,437 71.7% 1 Started V hi echicles being d ordered. 24 Substation PT & CT Replacement 256,218 256,218 143,653 112,565 56.1% 256,218 256,218 143,653 56.1% Started Material being received. 25 Replace of 69 kV Breakers 100,000 100,000 7,220 92,780 7.2% 100,000 100,000 7,220 7.2% Completed Installed. 26 Lighting Rehabilitation 100,000 100,000 107,644 (7,644) 107.6% 100,000 100,000 107,644 107.6% Started Foxhall 75% done. 27 Walker Road OH Conversion 350,511 350,511 - 350,511 0.0% 350,511 - - 0.0% Dropped Funds reappropriated. 28 Engineering Misc Equipment Replmnt 40,000 40,000 24,751 15,249 61.9% 40,000 40,000 24,751 61.9% Started Ongoing as needed. 29 Substation Batteries 24,500 24,500 23,489 1,011 95.9% 24,500 24,500 23,489 95.9% Started Ongoing as needed. 30 UG Transformers 120,536 120,536 60,031 60,505 49.8% 120,536 120,536 60,031 49.8% Started Ongoing as needed. 31 UG Conductors 529,464 529,464 131,559 397,905 24.8% 529,464 529,464 131,559 24.8% Started Ongoing as needed. 32 Meters 50,000 50,000 44,224 5,776 88.4% 50,000 50,000 44,224 88.4% Started Ongoing as needed. 33 69kV Sub Switch Replacement - 180,000 - 180,000 0.0% - 180,000 - 0.0% 34 Unit 3 Cooling Tower Fill 353,338 353,338 371,513 (18,175) 105.1% 353,338 398,338 371,513 93.3% Completed Done. 35 Units 1 & 2 Cooling Tower 218,730 218,730 70,280 148,450 32.1% 218,730 173,730 70,280 40.5% Completed Done. 36 Unit 3 Tubine Inspection 348,000 348,000 - 348,000 0.0% 348,000 - - 0.0% Started Scoping. Funding reallocated to Unit 1 37 Unit 3 Aux System Components 113,000 113,000 - 113,000 0.0% 113,000 - - 0.0% Deferred repair. 38 Plant Misc Equipment Replmnt 71,000 71,000 53,912 17,088 75.9% 71,000 71,000 53,912 75.9% Started Ongoing as needed. 39 Unit 3 Stack Repairs 25,000 25,000 - 25,000 0.0% 25,000 - - 0.0% Deffered Funding reallocated Unit 1 repair. Scoping, some funding 40 Units 1 & 2 Life Extension 276,000 276,000 23,601 252,399 8.6% 276,000 180,000 23,601 13.1% Started reallocated Unit 1 repair Emergency repair; Budget 41 Unit 1 Turbine Outage - - 424,747 (424,747) 0.0% - 412,000 424,747 103.1% Completed amendment approved in Dec. 42 Unit 3 FD & ID FAN CNRL UP 45,000 45,000 - 45,000 0.0% 45,000 - - 0.0% Deferred Next fiscal year. 43 Unit 3 DCS Com & Software 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 0.0% 30,000 - - 0.0% Deffered Next fiscal year. 44 Unit 2 Boiler Inspection & Repair - 175,000 102,151 72,849 58.4% - 175,000 102,151 58.4% Completed Emergency repair. 45 Unit 3 Heat Expansion Joint - 65,000 - 65,000 0.0% - 65,000 - 0.0% Not Started Scheduled Spring outage. 46 Units 1 & 2 Control Modifications - 150,000 - 150,000 0.0% - 150,000 - 0.0% Not Started Scheduled Spring outage. 47 Unit 3 Gas Line Modification - 60,000 - 60,000 0.0% - 60,000 - 0.0% Not Started Scheduled Spring outage. 48 Distribution Upgrades 400,000 400,000 139,891 260,109 35.0% 400,000 400,000 139,891 35.0% Started Ongoing as needed. 49 $ 3,609,497 $ 4,239,497 $ 1,842,102 $ 2,397,395 43.5% $ 3,609,497 $ 3,643,986 $ 1,842,102 50.6% 50 51 Grand Totals $ 19,374,399 $ 18,458,556 $ 14,662,546 $ 3,796,010 79.4% $ 3,609,497 $ 4,494,722 $ 2,504,584 55.7% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is rebudgeted to start over each fiscal year. B = Bonded Project Page 5 of 5