Este texto se extrajo de el PDF de forma automática y puede contener errores. El PDF es el registro oficial, así que consúltelo antes de confiar en esto.
7 páginas tienen poco o ningún texto legible aquí, a menudo por ser escaneos o dibujos. Para verlas, consulte el PDF.
Página 1
EXHIBIT #1
COUNCIL M INUTES OF 06/08/2009
PETITION TO AMEND AND ZONING DISTRICT
Public Hearing before the
Dover City Council
June 8, 2009
Applicants/Owners: Suzanne Noll
Location: 171 North Edgehill Avenue & 705 Maple Parkway
Tax Parcel ID #: ED05-068.18-01-42.00-000 and ED05-068.18-01-43.00-000
Size: 1.945 acres
Present Use: Residential Mobile Homes
Proposed Use: Medium Density Residential
Comprehensive
Plan Designation: Residential Medium Density
Present Zoning: R-7 (One Family Residence Zone)
Proposed Zoning: RM-2 (Medium Density Residence Zone)
Recommendation of
Planning Commission: Following a public hearing on May 18, 2009, where 4 members of
the public spoke regarding the rezoning application, the Planning
Commission unanimously recommended in favor of the request to
change the zoning from R-7 to RM-2.
File Number: Z-09-03
Página 2
Z-09-03 Lands of Noll
Report to City Council –June 8, 2009
Page 2
Existing Property
The property is currently zoned R-7 (One Family Residence Zone). Several single family homes
are located on the properties. The applicant is proposing to rezone both properties to RM-2
(Medium Density Residence Zone).
Surrounding Land Uses:
The property is surrounded by other residential properties as well as commercial properties that
abut Route 13 (North DuPont Highway). The adjacent residential properties to the north, east
and to the south are zoned R-7 (One Family Residence Zone). The land immediately west is
zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone).
Comprehensive Plan:
The 2008 Comprehensive Plan depicts the subject area in question as Medium Density
Residential land use on the Land Development Plan Map. The RM-2 zoning classification is
consistent with the Residential Medium Density land use classification.
Request for RM-2 (Medium Density Residence Zoning)
The following description of the RM-2 zoning district is provided from Article 3 §7 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Section 7. [Medium density residence] RM-2 zone.
7.1 Uses permitted. In an RM-2 zone, no building or premises shall be used, and no building or
part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole
or in part, for any purposes, except the following:
(a) Any use permitted in one-family residence zones;
(b) One-family lot-line dwellings, not to exceed one such dwelling per lot;
(c) Duplex dwellings;
(d) Multiplex dwellings;
(e) Townhouses;
(f) Roominghouses accommodating not more than five roomers.
(g) Garden apartments.
In addition, the RM-2 zoning district includes a density cap of eight (8) dwelling units per acre.
The primary differences between the current zone and the requested zone are the housing styles
permitted, density, and other bulk standards. The RM-2 district permits a higher density and a
wider range of housing styles than the R-7 district.
Recommendation of the Planning Staff & Planning Commission:
Staff supports the rezoning request from R-7 to RM-2. The request is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and the long-term redevelopment of the area.
Following a public hearing on May 18, 2009, where four members of the public spoke, asking
questions and expressing concerns regarding the rezoning, Planning Commission unanimously
passed a motion recommending in favor of rezoning the subject property from R-7 (One Family
Residence Zone) to RM-2 (Medium Density Residence Zone). Below is an excerpt from the
draft minutes of May 18, 2009, regarding the rezoning application.
Mrs. Aida Harrington – 172 North Edgehill Avenue – Stated that she owns
a small home and would like to know if this would affect her home with higher
Página 3
Z-09-03 Lands of Noll
Report to City Council –June 8, 2009
Page 3
taxes. She is not sure what they want to do with the trailers that are there, will
it be for commercial. What will they do with the trailer park?
Responding to Mrs. Harrington, Mrs. Townshend stated that the rezoning
application that is before us this evening would not permit commercial
development. It would permit different housing styles than what is there now
including duplexes, townhouses, rooming houses, and garden apartments. If
the applicant were to develop the property in the future, that would be another
application that would come before this commission and a public hearing
would be held at that time for which you would receive another mailed notice.
Mrs. Joyce Hall – 636 Maple Parkway – Stated that what she would like to
know is if the property is sold to a developer or rezoned what would be here
and whether or not they would have a say as far as what goes there such as
duplexes, townhouses, or low income houses that may bring down their
property value in this area? There are all single family dwellings in this area
for now. She is looking to find out what the future is for this property.
Responding to Mrs. Hall, Mrs. Townshend stated that again, currently they
have not discussed a development application; however, there are a range of
housing types such as garden apartments, townhouses, duplexes, and single
family homes. It is a small and awkward shaped parcel so for any
development that would happen, off street parking would need to be provided
as well as a stormwater management area.
Mrs. Hall further questioned if there is no plan to develop this, then why
rezone the property? Responding to Mrs. Hall, Mrs. Noll stated that she was
only starting the process as she did not know what she could or should do.
These trailers date back to 1963 and she is beating herself up trying to keep
them up and keep decent people in them. There is no washer or dryer hook-
ups in them which limits her and she is really trying to keep this area up. This
is where she is right now and does not know where to go from here.
Mr. Albert stated that there are ten units currently on this parcel and under the
RM-2 zoning classification, the maximum allowable units would be fifteen (15);
however, it would be very difficult to fit this many on this property that would
meet code requirements.
May Salevan – 18 Upland Avenue – Stated that she has lived in this
neighborhood for fifty-eight (58) years. Her question is how many homes, how
many duplexes, and how many townhouses are you planning on putting on
such a small lot? Responding to Mrs. Salevan, Mrs. Noll stated that she does
not have any plans; she is just seeing what she can do.
Mrs. Salevan further stated that the Edgehill Civic Association fought against
all of the houses that are now lined along the first row of houses in this area.
This was turned down time after time. The City was only going to put in two or
three and now they are lined up. She thinks this is the way any small
development might look close together. The farmhouse you have looks so
nice with all of the land around it. She is against anything being built; some
things just need cleaning up.
Página 4
Z-09-03 Lands of Noll
Report to City Council –June 8, 2009
Page 4
Tyrone Crittenden – 79 Upland Avenue – Stated that he has not been a
resident long in the neighborhood, only about three and half years. In the
short time that he has been there, he has noticed that the neighborhood is
beginning to change. This is a small neighborhood that would be known for
tipping. It could tip for the best, the better, or for the worst. What he has
seen is more private homes being turned into rental units and the folks and
the changes that he sees in this neighborhood because of these rental units
have been anything but positive. We have an opportunity to improve the City
as a whole and the neighborhood one by one. He does not know this woman;
however, he has seen her house and knows that it is an odd shaped piece of
property and has seen the trailers. He has to say that they have done a
good job in keeping the neighborhood safe and keeping the trailers, given
their age, in pretty good shape. What he is concerned about is what was
mentioned regarding rooming houses occupying this new structure that goes
up there. Most of us know that generally the kinds of people or the caliber of
people who rent rooming houses are not always the kinds of people who help
stabilize a neighborhood. We have to be careful what is being done here in
rezoning this property. Careful consideration needs to go into this rezoning
request as this neighborhood has a lot of elderly tenants and a lot of houses
that are becoming vacant as those tenants move into nursing homes or move
in with their children or whatever. We need to look at what we do with these
houses and what we do with an unknown element to a neighborhood that has
the possibility of improving better than what it currently is.
Mr. Friedman closed the public hearing after seeing on one else wishing to
speak.
Mr. von Reider questioned if there was any intention upon the applicant to
combine these two parcels into one parcel of land? Responding to Mr. von
Reider, Mrs. Townshend stated that no not as a part of the rezoning
application. Generally this would be a recommendation that would take place
during the time of development application.
Mr. Tolbert stated that currently, this is a trailer park and there are people
renting trailers at this point and there are ten (10) of them that are all rented.
Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Mrs. Noll stated that these are rented to low
income and there are no washer and dryer hook ups. There is a small
bedroom that will fit a double bed and they are 1963 trailers. The units are
10x50 and she has one that she has not rented for four (4) months because
she is having trouble renting it to someone she would want in her backyard as
well as the neighbors backyards.
Mr. Tolbert further questioned if this rezoning is approved and subsequent
housing development was proposed, would these people have to move?
Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Ms. Noll stated that yes the people would have to
leave.
Mr. von Reider questioned Staff; mentioned earlier there could be up to fifteen
(15) dwelling units on this piece of property and there are currently ten (10).
Given the configuration and setbacks, have you actually looked at different
Página 5
Z-09-03 Lands of Noll
Report to City Council –June 8, 2009
Page 5
possibilities that could go there or how many you actually think would go there
that would legally fit? Responding to Mr. von Reider, Mrs. Townshend stated
that Staff has not looked at alternative possibilities; however, Staff has looked
at it and determined that it would be less than eight (8) per acre. Staff feels
that she would be pushing to place ten (10) in there to meet the lot size
requirements for off street parking, stormwater management and any other
requirements.
Mr. von Reider stated that based on testimony this evening, there are ten units
there currently and they would not be looking at more than what is currently
there now should it get rezoned because of restrictions on setbacks and
sidewalks. Tearing out all of these old units will improve it instead of making it
worse.
Mr. DiMondi stated that to understand the Comprehensive Plan and judging
from his calculations, nineteen (19) out of the twenty-three (23) lots that ring
this property are zoned R-7 and only four (4) that are sporadic at best are in
the commercial zoning category. How did we on the Comprehensive Plan end
up with medium residential density as being recommended? Is R-7 a medium
density so the range from medium density is inclusive of R-7 in the sought
after zoning here this evening? Responding to Mr. DiMondi, Mrs. Townshend
stated that yes it is.
Mr. DiMondi further questioned if there were any non conforming placement
issues with regard to these trailers at the present time? Responding to Mr.
DiMondi, Mrs. Townshend stated that trailers are a legal non-conforming use
and if anything is built here it would have to adhere to current setbacks.
Mr. von Reider moved to forward to City Council approval of Z-09-03 Lands of
Noll located at 171 North Edgehill Avenue & 705 Maple Parkway from R-7 to
RM-2 medium density residential zoning with the consideration that any
further application or development of the property be brought back to the
Planning Commission for review as is standard procedure, seconded by
Colonel Welsh and the motion was unanimously carried.
Página 6
City of Dover Application No.: Z-09-03
Department of Planning & Inspections
EDGEHIL
L
«
AVENUE
E
GR
H
EN
U
EN
AV
ILL
E
Site
C-4 R-7
NE
LA
E
PL
MA
Plan Title: Lands of Noll
Location: 171 North Edgehill Avenue and 705 Maple Parkway
Plan Type: Rezoning Legend
Tax Parcel: ED-05-068.18-01-42.00-000 Dover Parcels
ED-05-068.18-01-43.00-000
Current Zoning: R-7 Zoning
Proposed Zoning: RM-2
Owner: Suzanne Noll Historic District
Date: 3-10-09 Corridor Overlay Zone
0 65 130 260 Feet
Página 7
EXHIBIT #2
COUNCIL M INUTES OF 06/08/2009
PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN APPLICATION
Before the Dover City Council
June 8, 2009
Project Name: Residences at Maple Dale Country Club
Applicants/Owners: Maple Dale Country Club, LLC
39 Maple Dale Road
Dover, DE 19904
Location: Maple Dale Country Club, east of Kenton Road
Property Addresses: 39 Maple Dale Drive
Dover, DE 19904
Tax Parcel ID #: ED-05-067.00-04-01.00-000
Size: 10.59 ± acres (of 152.45± acre site)
Proposed Use: Planned Neighborhood Design – Senior Citizen Housing Option
Present Zoning: RC (Recreational and Commercial)
File Number: MI-09-06
Página 8
MI-09-06 Maple Dale Country Club – Planned Neighborhood Design – Senior Citizen Housing Option
General Sketch Plan Review by City Council – June 8, 2009
Page 2
The applicant is requesting to utilize the Planned Neighborhood Design (PND) Senior Housing
Option as specified in the Zoning Ordinance, Article 3, Section 24, to construct approximately
90 residential units on a portion of the Maple Dale Country Club golf course. One hole on the
course would be relocated as a part of this proposal.
Planned Neighborhood Design – Review Process
The Zoning Ordinance prescribes a 2-step review process for PND development projects. The
first of steps is a review of a general sketch plan and statement of consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan by City Council to “determine whether the proposed project is of such a
design and type that it warrants further review by the planning commission. If the city council
determines that further review is warranted.” The second step is a Conditional Use Site Plan
review and public hearing before the Planning Commission.
For the City Council’s review of the application, the applicant must present a general sketch plan
and a statement documenting the project's compliance with the goals of the comprehensive plan
for review. These items are included as attachments.
Planned Neighborhood Design – Senior Citizen Housing Option
According to Article 3, Section 24.1(b) of the Zoning Ordinance,
In order to encourage the development of high quality housing
opportunities designed to accommodate the particular needs of senior
citizens, the senior citizen housing option shall be permitted in all zones as
a conditional use, except in the M, IPM and C-4 zones within which this
option shall not be applicable. Preference shall be given to those projects
which are within close proximity to public transit services and which are
situated within one-quarter mile of a grocery store, pharmacy, restaurant,
physician office, senior center or similar convenience service
establishment.
In regards to housing types, Article 3, Section 24.3(e) allows the following:
Under the senior citizen housing option, all housing types, and including
congregate housing structures and uses, assisted living residences, and
nursing homes. All such housing units and/or property shall be deed
restricted to require that the head of household for each housing unit be
at least 55 years of age or older.
Within a Planned Neighborhood Design, the Zoning Ordinance allows flexibility of the
requirements of the underlying zoning districts as it relates to bulk standards, specifically
residential density. According to Section 24.4 Maximum Density:
24.47Senior housing option. Project density shall be generally compatible
with the development pattern and existing or potential zone densities of the
surrounding area. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Página 9
MI-09-06 Maple Dale Country Club – Planned Neighborhood Design – Senior Citizen Housing Option
General Sketch Plan Review by City Council – June 8, 2009
Page 3
planning commission that the project density proposed is compatible with
the development pattern and density potential of the surrounding area in
general, and with that of adjoining properties in particular.
Project Description:
The proposal is to develop approximately 90 residential units (36 townhouse units and 3
apartment buildings with 18 units each) on a portion of the Maple Dale Country Club golf course
land. The applicant would relocate the one golf hole as a part of this proposal.
Surrounding Land Uses:
The proposed project is surrounded primarily by the Maple Dale Country Club golf course.
Lands surrounding the golf course are low and medium density residential developments.
Turnberry is located between the site and Kenton Road and is zoned RM-1 (Medium Density
Residence). Maple Dale Village, the Retreat, Fox Meadows, the Meadows, and Fox Hall are
also adjacent to the golf course. The zoning districts vary, but include, R-10 (One Family
Residence), R-8 (One Family Residence), RM-2 (Medium Density Residence), and RG-3 (Group
Housing Residential).
Planned Neighborhood Design – Design Requirements
The Zoning Ordinance prescribes certain design requirements for projects developed under the
Planned Neighborhood Design within Article 3, Section 24.6.
The Zoning Ordinance requires that for the PND Senior Housing Option, common open space be
provided in accordance with the area requirements of Article 5, Section 10.16. This requires that
275 square feet of active recreation area be provided per dwelling unit, or a minimum of one-half
acre. Based on this requirement, the applicant would be required to provide 24,750 square feet of
common open space, or approximately .57 acre, for the proposed 90 units. An Active Recreation
Plan must be submitted for review by the Parks, Recreation and Community Enhancement
Committee before the project is reviewed by the Planning Commission.
The Zoning Ordinance requires that a 40-foot buffer be provided around the perimeter of a PND
development. This will need to be identified on the plan prior to final approval.
The Zoning Ordinance requires that the project be designed to minimize disruption of the natural
environment and to provide privacy for residents of the development and maintain privacy for
adjacent residences.
Comprehensive Plan:
In the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Plan designates this site as Open Space.
The applicant’s proposal relates to the following goals from the 2008 Comprehensive Plan:
o Encourage balanced housing opportunities for all income levels and phases in life;
o To develop and maintain an adequate supply of housing of varying type, size, and
densities that are aesthetically pleasing and located within neighborhoods designed or
redesigned to promote convenience, conservation, and access to the greater
Página 10
MI-09-06 Maple Dale Country Club – Planned Neighborhood Design – Senior Citizen Housing Option
General Sketch Plan Review by City Council – June 8, 2009
Page 4
community, but which are properly buffered through distance and landscaping from
incompatible uses.
Action Required by City Council
City Council must determine if the project proposal is of a design and type that warrants further
review by the Planning Commission. If City Council believes that the proposal warrants review
by the Planning Commission, a motion should be passed to refer the application to the Planning
Commission.
Advisory Comments to the Applicant
1. The City Council may choose not to forward a proposal to the Planning Commission. In
such instances, the proposal would be considered denied.
2. The act of forwarding the proposal to the Planning Commission for further review does not
represent, nor shall it be construed to mean that the project is approved, nor is it intended to
represent that any variances necessary to construct the project are approved or supported by
City Council.
3. Under the Planned Neighborhood Design – Senior Citizen Housing Option, the property shall
be deed restricted to require that the head of household for each unit be at least 55 years of
age or older.
Attachments: Maps and Concept Plan of the Site Submitted by Applicant (5)
Letter from Applicant Explaining Proposal
cc: Project File MI-09-06
Michael Henry, Becker Morgan Group