Regular City Council Packet-REVISED

CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, March 25, 2024 at 6:30 PM City Hall Council Chambers, 15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, Delaware AGENDA THIS AGENDA AND PAPERLESS PACKET HAVE BEEN REVISED BY ADDING ITEM #4 CERTIFICATE OF CONGRATULATIONS – DOVER HIGH SCHOOL – 2024 DELAWARE INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION (DIAA) VARSITY GIRL’S BASKETBALL TEAM VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE This meeting will be held in the City Hall Council Chambers with electronic access via WebEx. Public participation information is as follows: Dial: 1-650-479-3208 Link: https://rb.gy/0pdxf8 Event number: 2535 795 2953 Event password: DOVER (if needed) If you are new to WebEx, get the app now at www.webex.com/ to be ready when the meeting starts. The meeting can also be viewed on Comcast Channel 14, Verizon Channel 20, and on the City's Streaming Player located at www.cityofdover.com under "Quick Links". OPEN FORUM - 15 Minutes Prior to Official Meeting (6:15 p.m.) The “Open Forum” segment is provided to extend the opportunity to the general public to share their questions, thoughts, comments, concerns, and complaints. Discussion of any item appearing on the agenda as a public hearing is prohibited during the Open Forum as an opportunity will be provided during consideration of that item. Citizen comments are limited to three (3) minutes. Council is prohibited from taking action since they are not in official session; however, they may schedule such items as regular agenda items and act upon them in the future. INVOCATION - Elder Ellis B. Louden PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilman Lewis ADOPTION OF AGENDA ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Page 1

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 25, 2024 PAGE 2 All Consent Agenda items are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. PRESENTATIONS 1. St. Patrick's Day Parade Awards A. Better than a Pot of Gold (Best Overall) - Jen-Mor Florist B. 4 Leaf Clover Award (Best Irish Themed) – Irish Mike's C. SHAMROCKIN' Award (Best Musical Group) – Delaware Celtic Society Pipe Band D. SHAMROCKIN' Scholars Award - Dover High Marching Band E. Luck of the Irish (Best Irish Spirit) - Irish Society of Delmarva F. Leprechaun Award (Best in Show - Youth Aged) – Hester Academy of Dance G. Saint Patrick Award (Most Authentic Irish Attire) – Deacon McMullen from Holy Cross Catholic Church 2. Certificate of Appreciation - St. Patrick's Day Parade - Agape Body Piercings 3. Certificate of Congratulations - Dover High School - 2024 Varsity Cheerleading Squad 4. Certificate of Congratulations - Dover High School - 2024 Delaware Interscholastic Athletic Association (DIAA) Varsity Girl's Basketball Team 5. Certificate of Congratulations - Dover High School - 2024 Delaware Interscholastic Athletic Association (DIAA) Unified Basketball Team 6. Certificate of Congratulations - Dover High School - 2024 Delaware Interscholastic Athletic Association (DIAA) Varsity Boy's Basketball Team CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTION OF MINUTES 7. Regular City Council Meeting of March 11, 2024 COMMITTEE REPORTS 8. Council Committee of the Whole Report March 12, 2024 Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement 9. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Proposed Grant Recommendations for Fiscal Year 2024 (Tracey Harvey, CDBG Program Manager) Page 2

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 25, 2024 PAGE 3 (Committee Recommendation: Approval of the recommended funding amounts) 10. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS - February 2024 A. Council President Hare B. First District C. Second District D. Third District E. Fourth District F. At-Large G. Mayor Christiansen Utility Committee 11. Department of Energy Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnership (GRIP) Presentation (Scott Lynch, DEMEC) (Committee Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2024-05 as submitted so staff may complete a letter of commitment to American Municipal Power (AMP) for its Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnership (GRIP) Incentive Application.) Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee 12. Evaluation of Proposals - Ambulance Services Contract (Kay Sass, Public Affairs and Emergency Management Coordinator) (Committee Recommendation: Table the evaluation of proposals for the Ambulance Services contract) Special Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Meeting - March 25, 2024 13. Evaluation of Proposals - Ambulance Services Contract (Kay Sass, Public Affairs and Emergency Management Coordinator) (Staff Recommendation: Take from the table authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract to provide emergency ambulance services to the City of Dover for a three-year period with the option of a one (1), two-year extension with the negotiated ending date of June 30, 2027.) ITEMS NOT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA 14. Evaluation of Proposals - Ambulance Services Contract (Kay Sass, Public Affairs and Emergency Management Coordinator) Page 3

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 25, 2024 PAGE 4 (Committee Recommendation: Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract to provide emergency ambulance services to the City of Dover for a three-year period with the option of a one (1), two-year extension with the negotiated ending date of June 30, 2027.) ORDINANCES FIRST READING - The First Reading is offered on the Proposed Ordinance. Final action by Council will take place during the Second Reading on APRIL 08, 2024. The ordinance is available at the entrance of the Council Chambers, on the City's website at www.cityofdover.com under "Government," or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 302-736-7008 or cityclerk@dover.de.us. 15. Proposed Ordinance #2024-02 - Amending Chapter 106 - Traffic and Vehicles, Sec. 106- 136 - On-street disabled parking (Councilman Neil and Councilwoman Arndt) FIRST READING REFERRAL - The First Reading is offered on the Proposed Ordinance. It is recommended for referral to the Planning Commission for a public hearing on APRIL 15, 2024 and that a Public Hearing before City Council be set for MAY 13, 2024 at 6:30 p.m., at which time the Final Reading and Council action will take place. The ordinance is available at the entrance of the Council Chambers, on the City's website at www.cityofdover.com under "Government," or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 302-736-7008 or cityclerk@dover.de.us. 16. Proposed Ordinance #2024-09-Lands of Linda Duncan at 600 Forest Street A. Ordinance 2024-09 Review and Recommendation for a rezoning application for a parcel of land consisting of 0.51 acres+/-. The property is zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and subject to the H (Historic District Zone) and the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning for the property is C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) and remaining subject to the H (Historic District Zone) and the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone). The property is located on the south side Forest Street and near the west end of Loockerman Street. (The owner of record is Linda Duncan. The equitable owner is Erin Barrett. Property Address: 600 Forest Street. Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.12-02-44.00-000 and ED-05-076.12- 02-45.00-000. Council District 4.) 17. Proposed Ordinance #2024-10-Lands of White Marsh Environmental Systems Inc at 1100 & 1110 S Little Creek Rd A. Ordinance 2024-10 Review and Recommendation for a rezoning application for a parcel of land consisting of 10.7146 acres +/-. The property is zoned CPO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone). The proposed zoning for the property is IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone). The property is located on the south side of South Little Creek Road and west of State Route 1. The owner of record is White Marsh Environmental Systems Inc. c/o Tidewater Utilities. Property Addresses: 1100 and 1110 S. Little Creek Road. Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.12-01- 03.00-000. Council District 2. Page 4

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 25, 2024 PAGE 5 CITY MANAGER’S ANNOUNCEMENTS MAYOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. PURSUANT TO 29 DEL. C. §10004(e)(2), THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, WHICH ARISE AT THE TIME OF THE MEETING Page 5

Item #1. Page 6

Page 7 iAHunwwo;) .Ino 01 uOHn;)~PdP .InoA .IoJ nOA ~unL{! inoA d~H slundp~pnd Aq pd.InSndW dq un;) 1UdAd.Ino JO SSd;);)nSdL{! °vZOZ gpU.IUd AUa S,)}JI.I1Ud °lS S,.IgAOa JO AlI:) (O]W]Hl HSllIIlS]H) rnNMV}llA01:J .IV]1 t dLJl S,])IIW HSllII 01 S~l{llUdSdlddM. UO~l~u~oJdlpun lOUOl{l{l~M Item #1.

0 tpj t::J:J t-'4 ~ ~ ~ ~ .(D ~ . ~ en ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~. (D ~ n ~ ~ 0 rl- ~ ~ ~~<-< (") 0 ~ ~ en 0 •••••••• ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ::s ~"""'"' 0 w~ <...< a 0 ~ o ~ 0 Z -... 0 ~ ~ -< ~ Q> ~ (D tpj ~ n ::s ~ (D ~ ~ ~ <...< a CI:l (D o 0 C/:J ~ q ~ ~ - ~ ~ rl- ~ (D tr ~ . ~ (j 0 s· p,.::S ~ ~ (D t)" ~ ~ p,. (D rl- ~ ri"- ~ n :::s- -. o ~ S ~. ~ ~ n ::s ~ •..... ~ (D (J ~ ~. O Vl (D ..•. ::to ~ OJ ~ ~ 0 -. o en ~ ~ -.... t"P'j CI:l ~. .-r ~ a t::J:J 0 ::s0 o 8- ~ ~ Ot)"~ ~ ~ <...< n ~ ~ o "1:j ~ tpj ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ::to ~ ~~ ~ CI'.) ~ S 8. p.. ~ ~ "1:j ~ (D e ~ ::e (D C/.) (D ~ n ~ -. ~ N ~ ~rzo ......; ::::; N >- ~ •••••••• t'-4 ::s ::s~ 0 ~~ ~ <...< CJ ~ ~. ~ 0 C/.) r./.J .~.....; ~ ~ 0 C ~ ~ Z Page 8 Item #1.

Page 9 IAHUTIWUlOJ JTIO 01 uOnt?J~PdP JTIOA JOJ TIOA)[ut?LJJ. ITIOA d)[H Slut?d~JHJt?d Aq PdJTISt?dW dq ut?J 1UdAd JTIO JO SSdJJTIS dLJJ. .tZ oz gPl1J'Bd A'BO S,)[J!Jl'Bd ·lS S,JdAOO JO AH;) mIVM.V SNV10H:)S ,NDI:)O'HWVHS gql ama DNIHJNVW HDIH N1AOa Ol S~llllUdSdJd dM. UO~l~U~OJdJpun JOUOlllll~M Item #1.

Item #1. Certificate of Congratulations With honor and recognition we present this to IRISH SOCIETY OF DELMARVA the LUCK OF THE IRISH (BEST IRISH SPIRIT) City of Dover's St. Patrick's Day Parade 2024. The success of our event can be measured by participants like you! Thank you for your dedication to our community! Page 10

~ t'rj ~ ~ ::s- ~ (t) en o ::c: ~. tTj M- n ~ ~ (D n (J ....•. r:/:J ~ ~ R q ~ ~ ~ 0 ~. g- ~ 0 ~ ::s 0 ~ tTj ::s ~ ~~ Z 0 ~. <...c:: 0 a ~ ~ (J o ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ (t) ~ ::s ~ 0' < ~ ~ (t) ::s ri- ~ -... (/.) ~ >- n p. (D a C/) ~ ~ (J I"'""!'- (D ~ ~ . 0 p..::S r5 >- 0 ~ (t) 0"' ~ p..(t) ~ ,-... tj I"'""!'- ~ (S. 3 ....•. ~ ~ ~ ('1) c2::s ~ (t) ::to ~ n ~ (D ~. M- ~. n 0 o en ~ -... f"""t- ::s ~~ (/.) •••••••• ~ 0 ri- (t) a ::s o p.. ~ ~ ~ o 0"' ~ CI'.l ~ <...c:: ~ (J ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ::to ~ ~ ~ ;3 ~. $:l.. ~ ('D ~ ~ ~ (D C/.) ~ ::s (D ,_..::s~ N ~ ~c;ro ._. ~ N ::s M- ~ ~ ~. M- ~~ ~ f"""t- ~ ~ 0 ~ ~. C/.) ~ ~ n M- a._. fJ;J tTj 0 ~ ('1) ~ '-'" Page 11 Item #1.

Page 12 IAHunlUUIo~ .Ino 01 uOHU~~PdP.InoA .IoJ nOA)[uul..Jl InoA d)[H SluudPH.Iud Aq pd.InSUdUI dq uu~ 1UdAd.Ino JO SSdJ~ns dl..Jl ·tZOZ gPl!Jl!d Al!a S,)JJ!Jll!d ·lS S,JgAOa JO Al!:J (~.I!llVqS!.II ~!lu~qlnv lSOW)mIYMV )lJ:rn~Vd LNIVS dl{l Na11IlW~W HOHNOJvaa Ol S~l{llUdSgld dM. UO~l~U~O:Jdlpun lOUOLJ l{l~M Item #1.

Page 13 .Ior(0/IV ~~ fr[O[ '~[ l[:JJVW ·wSfJ.lsnlfJuo .1no(( pUfJ 'd!lfSPUo!.1J .1no(( 'no(( PfJlf 2u.MfJlf .foJ JnJoJfJ.J2 o.ffJ 0.IM ·oq oJ JUfJM oJdood o.1olfM o:JfJJd fJ .1ottOa 2U.IJjfJW oJ JUoWJ!WWO:J .mo(( pUfJ S.1olfJo o.f!dsu! oJ ssou2u.Ill.IM .fno(( .foJ .IpoJ 'no(( JjUfJl1.L ·oPfJW Sd.Il1spuo!4 ol1J 2u.l.1nsfJo.1J .1otto.1oJ 's2u.IlfJ 2u!zfJwfJ 2u!op onulJuo:J no(( SfJ o.1!WpfJ pUfJ If:JJfJM oJ onu_1Juo:J Jnq .1fJo(( JXou .10J d.Il1s.1opfJoJ .1no(( SS!W 11!M 0.IM ·0.10W If:Jnw os pUfJ dno.12 .1ottOa UMOJUMOa UO!JfJU.IJSoa ol1J '.1ottOa Jo to.zJ ol1J I1J.IM JuowottJOttu.I .1no(( lf2no.1I1J MOI1S oJ sonu_1Juo:J t(J.lunWWO:J ol1Jfa JuoW.fOJJoq ol1J OJ UO.IJOttop pUfJ UO!JfJ:J.lpoP s, fJSfJUfJJ ·SJV ·to.zunwwo:J .1no .foJ oPfJ.1fJd ((va s, )j:J.UJfJd "JS ol1J .1011J020JJnd OJ SoJjfJJ J! so:J!/.z.f:JfJSJfJUOS.1odpUfJ JuoWJ.lWWO:J OW_1Jol1J oz.zu20:Jo.1 oM JfJlfJ opnJ.lJfJ.12 Jlofi.1fJolf lfJ.lM S! JI VSVNVJ [aoJ ·SW OJ poJUoSo.fd NOI.LVI:J~NJJV !lO ~.LV:JI!lI.LN~:J Item #2.

Item #2. CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION Presented to MS. TABBY PROUD It is with great appreciation that we recognize the incredible undertaking of the efforts put forth for a successful St. Patrick's Day Parade, allowing our community to come together. Ms. Proud's mindfulness to details and commitment to others, aids the efforts in helping it all come together. So many lack the understanding of the time involved in such an undertaking so we are very grateful for the sacrifice you and Ms. Canasa dedicated over the years. We will miss working with you but are so thankful for the friendships formed. Many thanks for your genuine kindness, your work ethic, and your overall commitment in making the City of Dover a place where people want to live, work and play. March 25, 2024 Mayor Page 14

Item #3. CERTIFICATE OF CONGRATULATIONS Presented to The Dover High School Varsity Cheerleading Squad on being the 2024 Large Varsity State Champions and Defending National Champions. We commend the following student-athletes for their outstanding performance: La'Niyah Bailey Aniyah McCall Jordyn Bugam Jalia'McNair Logyn Caveza DeBaca Za 'Nya Moore Nai'Jae Clark Elaina Ramos Mia Grandpre Brea Redd- Taylor Amira Gray Ariah Smith Javana Gray Raniyah Smith Taylor Mason Zada Watson The entire team and Coaches Brianni Shukur and Samantha Welsh are applaudedfor their remarkable achievement. We enjoyed cheering you on and lookforward to next season. March 25, 2024 al~~-William F. Hare Mayor Council President Page 15

Item #4. CERTIFICATE OF CONGRATULATIONS Presented to The Dover High School Girls' Basketball Team on being the 2024 Girls' Henlopen North Conference Champions. We commend the following student-athletes for their outstanding performance: Danielle Abercrombie Mila Milstead Sara Zionna Benson A uriana Moore Ayssatu Epps Zamiyah Quick Lily Harper Amani Sudler Kaitlyn Hill Ashtyn Torbert Myasia Holloway Brennyn Torbert Malya Milstead The entire team and Coaches Jahi Davenport, Quanda Drummond, George Roach, and Aurthur Doakes, are applaudedfor their remarkable achievement. We enjoyed cheering you on and look forward to next season. March 25, 2024 /1)~~. William F. Hare Mayor Council President Page 16

Item #5. CERTIFICATE OF CONGRATULATIONS Presented to The Dover High School Unified Basketball Team on being the 2024 Delaware Interscholastic Athletic Association (DIAA) Unified Basketball State Champions. We commend the following student-athletes for their outstanding performance: Dominick Barbosa Eacho Saniah Nichols Imani Clemmons-Pierce Ramsey Robinson Theodore Cottle Sawyer Shade Perry Giddens- White Yahsim Smalls Nevae Grandison JayDen Tickner Jerin Johnson Brandon Yoder Javen Kwok The entire team and Coaches Michael Denman and Nikola Sijan are applauded for their remarkable achievement. We enjoyed cheering you on and lookforward to next season. March 25, 2024 tt)~- William F. Hare Mayor Council President Page 17

Item #6. CERTIFICATE OF CONGRATULATIONS Presented to The Dover High School Boys' Basketball Team on being the 2024 Delaware Interscholastic Athletic Association (DIAA) Boys' Basketball State Champions. We commend the following student-athletes for their outstanding performance: Denim Perkins Shadrach Mansaray Dorell Little Chase Little Kole Turner Darien Robinson Noah Allen Istavan Norwood Nahseem Cosme Kareem King JayVion Denis Tarrance Williams Kameron Jackson-Dickson Alexandra Galarza and Nevaeh Lewis -Team Managers The entire team and Coaches Stephen Wilson, Randall Fogan, Darien "Stretch" Robinson, Kendall Williams, and Jason Wolford are applaudedfor their remarkable achievement. We enjoyed cheering you on and look forward to next season. March 25, 2024 a)~. William F. Hare Mayor Council President Page 18

Item #7. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING The Regular City Council Meeting was held on March 11, 2024, at 6:31 p.m. with Council President Hare presiding. Council members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Boggerty (arrived via WebEx at 6:33 p.m. And departed at 7:20 p.m.), Mr. Neil, Dr. Pillsbury, Ms. Arndt, Mr. Rocha, Mr. Sudler, and Mr. Lewis. Staff members present were Police Chief Johnson, Ms. Marney, Mr. Hugg, Ms. Melson- Williams, Chief Carey (via WebEx), Mr. Rodriguez, and Ms. Bennett. Mayor Christiansen was also present. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 6:17 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Hare declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council was not in official session and could not take formal action. There was no one present wishing to speak during the Open Forum. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Elder Ellis B. Louden. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Sudler. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Ms. Arndt, and unanimously carried. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All Consent Agenda items are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. Mr. Sudler moved for adoption of the consent agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Neil, and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. PRESENTATION – ANNUAL REPORT – PLANNING, INSPECTIONS, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2023 ANNUAL REPORT Ms. Sharon Duca, Assistant City Manager, reviewed the 2023 Annual Report. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the results of the C-2 revisions are scheduled this evening for the public hearing on the proposed ordinance. Ms. Melson-Williams further stated that she would defer the details until they get to the agenda item. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Duca stated that one of the biggest things that they need to ensure is consistency within the department. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Duca stated that she is helping with the administration of all five Page 19

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 2 (5) divisions. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Duca explained that they could find the pros and cons on both sides and keeping them together, they are very intertwined in a lot of aspects. Such as, the permit process goes through numerous departments. It goes through the division’s planning as well as building inspections in the fire marshal’s office and the inspections are performed by all of them. Ms. Duca further explained that some of them overlap with code, which greatly involves planning and that definitely a tie that keeps them together. The city does have a history of splitting apart departments and putting them back together and you could find reasoning to try to consolidate some of that a little better. Ms. Duca believes that it’s more of what the overall intent is and where they would have to look at what the financial ramifications would be of splitting. Mr. Anderson moved for acceptance of the Planning, Inspections, and Community Development 2023 Annual Report. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE/FINAL READING – PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. #2024-01 – AMENDING APPENDIX B – ZONING, ARTICLE 3 – DISTRICT REGULATIONS, SECTION 13 – CENTRAL COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-2) AND OTHER SECTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider the text amendments of Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 13 – central Commercial Zone (C-2) and other sections of the Zoning Ordinance. Council President Hare reminded members of the public that copies of the proposed ordinance were available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or on the City's website at www.cityofdover.com under "Government." Mr. Neil moved that the Final Reading of Proposed Ordinance #2024-01 be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury, and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of January 22, 2024.) Ms. Dawn Melson-Williams, Principal Planner reviewed Proposed Ordinance No. #2024-01 – Amending Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 13 – Central Commercial Zone (C-2) and other sections of the zoning ordinance. Responding to Ms. Melson-Williams, Mr. Lewis explained that the letter dated January 8th, 2024, addressed to City Clerk Bennett concerning parking indicates in paragraph three (3) that there are no parking requirements for existing buildings in the C-2 zone, and there are also no minimum parking requirements for new construction in the C-2 zone. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Melson-Williams highlighted that there are several parking options available, with many parcels already having on-site parking capabilities. She noted that parking options range from areas with no street parking to managed parking lots and alternative transportation modes like walking and transit options. Ms. Melson-Williams clarified that the Page 20

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 3 zoning ordinance does not compel existing locations to alter their parking arrangements. Instead, it primarily addresses parking requirements for new developments, whether they involve existing buildings or new construction, outlining the parking standards applicable in those scenarios. Responding to Ms. Melson-Williams, Mr. Lewis asked that for the existing residents, it would not have an effect on the record for the existing residents that live in that area. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Melson-Williams noted that existing residents may already have various parking options at their disposal. However, she clarified that the specifics of how individuals, property owners, or landlord-tenant arrangements choose to manage parking is not addressed by this ordinance provision. The provision primarily pertains to new developments and does not dictate how existing parking situations should be managed. Responding to Ms. Melson-Williams, Mr. Lewis mentioned that on page 59 of the packet, there is a reference to the text amendment C-2 central commercial zoning uses and standards, specifically related to development standards. He noted that it lists public comments received through February 7th, 2024, including letters from the Downtown Dover Partnership and Donnie Legends, whom he believes owns a business in the city. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Melson-Williams explained that the package Mr. Lewis is referencing contains a series of written comments received before the Planning Commission meeting. During the meeting, representatives from various groups spoke, but she would need to check if any of them spoke solely as residents. She noted that while some speakers were residents of the City of Dover, their discussions mainly centered around their roles as business owners or their involvement in other organizations, rather than focusing on themselves solely as residents. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams explained that the city's parking requirements are currently specified in several different ways within the zoning ordinance. Ms. Melson- Williams further explained that individual zones may have specific parking requirements. Article six (6) of the ordinance deals with parking regulations, which are tied to zoning and specific land uses. If there is a particular use, then there is a different parking requirement that is listed. The current proposal suggests that in the downtown redevelopment target area, new construction projects can claim a parking exemption for certain uses. However, they must provide a detailed parking strategy as part of their development plan process, which would then be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the process would be to submit a parking strategy and that strategy could include building a certain number of parking spaces on- site. The parking strategy might involve anticipating visitors parking once and then visiting multiple locations without moving their car. Alternatively, it could involve expecting users or tenants to arrive via transit or other multimodal options. Ms. Melson-Williams clarified that the proposed approach leaves room for flexibility in how developers address their parking strategy. She noted that it is unlikely that all parking needs would be met through on-street parking alone. Ms. Melson-Williams explained that there are various factors to consider when developing a parking strategy. These include time limits for parking spaces, restrictions on parking for certain streets, and eligibility criteria for the residential parking permit program. Developers have Page 21

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 4 flexibility in how they package together their parking strategy, considering these factors. The City of Dover's code already acknowledges that the downtown area is likely to have transit options and be conducive to multimodal transportation and walkability. This recognition is reflected in how parking is addressed in the area. Council President Hare declared the public hearing open at 7:12 PM. Todd Stonesifer, 115 North State Street, stated that he has had the opportunity to serve as the President of the Downtown Dover Partnership. Mr. Stonesifer expressed concern that under the current C-2 zoning, developers may be deterred from investing in the area. Mr. Stonesifer believes that the solution to the downtown area is density and more pedestrians on the streets. Mr. Stonesifer explained that he believes that the road system needs to shrink in size in order to make it safer and easier to walk along the Loockerman Street corridor. Mr. Stonesifer also suggested that Loockerman Street should not function as a through street but rather as a destination in itself. He proposed that the side streets off Loockerman should be the primary modes of transportation. Mr. Stonesifer expressed his support for the zoning changes and requested their approval. John Childress, 297 Katy Court, New Jersey, stated that he is the Interim Planning Director leading the Mosaic Development Partners in creating the master plan. He explained that the requirements and regulations proposed by the planning department will serve two crucial purposes. First, they will attract more developers and encourage private investment in the area. Second, they will enhance the city's aesthetic appeal and align with its overall beauty. Jed Hatfield, Colonial Parking, 715 North Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware, stated that they are considering a property located in the heart of downtown to serve as the Center for All Transit Movement. The plan includes providing bus access to the facility, as well as accommodating automobiles, bicycles, scooters, and other modes of transportation, all in one central location as outlined in the code. Mr. Hatfield further explained that having a centralized parking facility takes the burden off some of the other projects, as well as creating a much more efficient parking within downtown. A single facility or a series of facilities could cater to both businesspeople during the day and residents primarily at night. This approach would ensure a more efficient use of parking spaces downtown, avoiding overbuilding and having empty spaces during the day. By managing these facilities effectively, we can make better use of the available space. Zach Prebula, 173 Abigail Lane, Magnolia, stated that he is in support of the text amendments and believes that they will contribute to the revitalization of the downtown area. He expects that these changes will not only attract developers but also entice new businesses to the area and bring in new residents. Mike Lick, Lighthouse Construction, 859 Golf Links Lane, Magnolia, stated that he is one of the developers for the old Dover Post. Mr. Lick explained that the changes that are before them tonight are absolutely critical for successful development in downtown Dover. Ed Dougherty, 25 Lotus Street stated that he highly recommends that they take the initiative and start pushing for change. He emphasized the need for something different, noting that the city is Page 22

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 5 expecting an influx of new residents who will deserve a functional downtown Dover. Andria Bennett, City Clerk read three (3) letters of support for the proposed ordinance (Exhibits 1-3). Toby Jackson Oakley,12 Representative Lane, stated that she is not in opposition to anything that is going on downtown. Ms. Oakley explained that she is the daughter of two (2) elderly parents and is concerned for elderly people because her mom cannot walk long distances. Ms. Oakley further explained that if a proposal were made to block off Loockerman Street, allowing parking only on the outskirts, it would raise concerns. She highlighted that this arrangement would be particularly challenging for elderly individuals, citing her mother's difficulty in walking long distances. Council President Hare declared the public hearing closed at 7:31 PM. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Stonesifer clarified that there are no plans to close Loockerman Street to vehicular traffic and make it pedestrian-only. He explained that they are considering a concept to narrow the street, which would slow down traffic, widen the sidewalks, and retain all existing street parking. This approach aims to enhance pedestrian safety and comfort without reducing available parking spaces; instead, it would add to the overall parking capacity. By motion of Mr. Neil, seconded by Ms. Arndt, Council, by a roll call vote of seven (7) yes (Anderson, Neil, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, and Hare), one (1) no (Lewis), and one (1) absent (Boggerty), adopted Ordinance #2024-01, as follows: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 Section 13. Central Commercial Zone (C-2) be amended to read as follows: APPENDIX B – ZONING ARTICLE 3 - DISTRICT REGULATIONS Section 13. - Central commercial zone (C-2). 13.1 Uses permitted. In a central commercial zone (C-2), no building or premises shall be used, and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, intended, or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except the following: (a) Retail stores. (b) Restaurants, cafes, and eating establishments. Commercial kitchens. Microbrewery, craft distillery, and meadery establishments. (e) Hotels, including bed and breakfast inns. Page 23

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 6 (f) Art galleries and artisan studios. (g) Service establishments. (h) Banks and financial institutions (i) Personal service establishments. (j) Business, professional, and government offices. (k) Apartments and multi-family dwellings, provided that no dwelling units shall be permitted on the first floor on the street frontage of Loockerman Street. Uses accessory to the residential units such as lobby and amenity spaces are permitted on the first floor. (l) Live-work units. (m) Indoor recreation and amusement establishments. (n) Parking lots and parking structures as a principal use. (o) Places of public assembly. (p) Manufacturing, assembling, converting, altering, finishing, cleaning, cooking, baking, or any other processing of products where goods so produced or processed are to be sold at retail on the premises or online and where the size of the establishment shall not exceed 5,000 square feet in floor area. (q) Open space areas. 13.2 Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general conditions set forth in article 10, section 1: (a) Manufacturing, assembling, converting, altering, finishing, cleaning, cooking, baking, or any other processing of products where goods so produced or processed are to be sold at retail on the premises or online and where the size of the establishment exceeds 5,000 square feet in floor area. 13.3 Uses prohibited. The following uses are prohibited: (a) Fuel pumps and motor vehicle storage, sales, or repairs. 13.4 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than offstreet parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for outdoor eating areas, outdoor gathering areas, and outdoor sales areas approved by the city planner or approved as part of the site development plan approval required by article 3, section 13.6. 13.5 Design standards. The following standards shall apply to the site and building development in the central commercial zone (C-2): 13.51 Façade Articulation. Building facades should incorporate design elements to provide a base, middle, and top of the building to reinforce the pedestrian scale at the street level. 13.52 Height. For buildings greater than four (4) stories in height, then the upper floors above the fourth story shall step back six (6) feet for fifty percent (50%) of the width of the primary facade. For buildings greater than six (6) stories, then the upper floors above the sixth floor shall step back an additional six (6) feet on the primary façade. These step Page 24

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 7 back areas may begin at a lower height than these minimums as part of the building design in order to be compatible with the character of the area. 13.53 Step back areas. The step back areas should be open to the sky and can be open air balcony spaces or other design architectural features that are not enclosed spaces. 13.54 Off-street Parking. Off-street parking lots shall not be permitted to be situated between the street line and the primary facade of the principal building. Consideration should be given to locating parking to the side or rear of the building. 13.55 Screening. Any off-street parking lots provided shall be screened from the street line by buildings, landscaping, or other means. Off-street parking lots shall be screened from adjacent residential zones and residential uses. This screening provision does not apply to adjacent alleys. 13.6 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in article 5, section 8.1. 13.7 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for any change of use. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 4 Section 4.14 amended to read as follows: Section 4.14. - C-1, C-1A, C-2, C-2A zones. Bulk and parking regulations for neighborhood commercial (C-1), limited commercial (C-1A), central commercial (C-2), and limited commercial (C-2A) zones are as follows: C-1 C-1A C-2 C-2A Minimum required: Lot area (sq. ft.) 2,500 Lot width (ft.) 25 Lot depth (ft.) 70 100 Front yard (ft.) 25 25 0 15 Side yard (ft.) None required, None required, None required, None required, but 5 feet min. but 5 feet min. but 5 feet min. if but 5 feet min. if if provided if provided provided provided Rear yard (ft.) 15 15 20 above ground 20 above ground floor. At ground floor. At ground floor, 5 ft. floor, 5 ft. required required Side or rear yards 15 15 15 25 Page 25

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 8 C-1 C-1A C-2 C-2A which adjoin a residential zone (ft.) Off-street parking Per 300 sq. ft. floor 1 area or Per employee 1 (whichever is greater) Maximum permitted: Building height Stories 2 2 10 6 Feet 30 30 125 75 Floor area ratio 1.0 1.5 5.0 4.0 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 5 Section 6 amended to read as follows: Section 6. - Dumpsters for trash and recycling. 6.1 Location of trash receptacles. In all zones of the City of Dover (except in residential zones where standard City of Dover 90-gallon trash containers are used), all trash receptacles and bulk recycling bins (excluding publicly operated recycling drop off centers), which shall be referred to collectively as "dumpsters" in this ordinance, are to be situated in order to allow safe and efficient access by trash collection vehicles and shall be screened from public view. All dumpsters must comply with the following regulations: 6.11 Location and screening required. All dumpsters must be located in approved locations on the lot. Dumpsters must be placed on hard, paved, dust-free surfaces and may not be placed in designated parking spaces, fire lanes, or access ways. Outside storage of trash, cardboard, or shipping pallets is prohibited. A dumpster enclosure is required to screen the dumpster from view whenever these units are situated so that they will be visible from any public right -of-way or from an adjacent property. 6.12 Minimum dumpsters required. Use Dumpsters Required Apartment complex or Apartment Two required for the first 48 apartments; one required for Building with over 10 units each additional 24 apartments or fraction thereof Non-residential uses Two required per property 6.13 Selection of trash service. Applicants for site development plan approval shall specify the proposed method of trash collection at the time of application. A change in the method of Page 26

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 9 collection may require an alteration of the site plan, subject to approval of the city planner or the planning commission. 6.14 Maneuvering space. Adequate off-street truck maneuvering space shall be provided on- lot and not within any public street right-of-way or other public lands. Internal site circulation lanes are to be designed with adequate turning radii to accommodate the size and efficient maneuvering of trash collection vehicles. 6.15 Minimum dimensions for dumpster enclosures. All dumpster enclosures must be adequate to screen dumpsters from public view. Enclosures for private collection must be no less than seven feet in height. The height of enclosures for City of Dover collection may be no less than five feet high. 6.16 Enclosure construction. All dumpster enclosures shall be constructed of durable materials that will withstand the normal use and wear expected in trash removal operations. Whenever a dumpster, in its enclosure, will be visible from a public right-of-way, the appearance of the dumpster enclosures shall complement the architecture of the principal building on the lot, and be constructed with the same or similar exterior materials. 6.17 Gates. Gates are required whenever a dumpster, in its enclosure, will be visible from a public right-of-way. Gates must be designed to swing back behind the front of the enclosure and lock in the open position. If City of Dover trash service is provided, it is the responsibility of the property owner or occupant to open and securely lock back the gates to allow for trash pick up. The gates may be opened 12 hours prior to pick up and must be closed within 12 hours after pick up. 6.18 Reduction of dumpster requirement. When a use is required to provide dumpsters as part of site development plan approval, the required number of dumpsters may be reduced under the following circumstances: a) Dumpster pads reserved for future use. An area of the site reserved for a dumpster may be substituted for an actual dumpster. The provided area must be large enough to accommodate a dumpster and must be accessible to trash collection services. The city planner may require that the owner of record of the property provide a dumpster in the reserved location, together with any enclosure required, upon determining there is need for the additional dumpster. b) Trash compactor substitution. Trash compactors may be substituted for ordinary dumpsters at a two to one ratio. The city planner may approve a higher substitution ratio if specifications are provided indicating the machine will achieve a correspondingly higher trash compaction ratio. Trash compactors must meet the same location and screening requirements as other dumpsters. Sites providing trash compactors must still provide separate receptacles for recycling. c) Alternative solutions. Alternative solutions for the storage of and collection methods for trash and recycling receptables may be considered. The city planner or planning commission may authorize alternative solutions. Page 27

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 10 6.2 Location and screening approval required. The locations of new dumpsters on a site and any screening necessary shall be approved through the site development plan approval process, according to the type of review required in article 10 of this appendix. 6.3 Unauthorized dumpsters. Any dumpster not previously approved through the site development plan approval process may be required by the city planner to be moved, removed, or screened if said dumpster is a nuisance to neighboring properties by virtue of its current location. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 6 Section 3.1 amended to read as follows: Section 3. - Required off-street parking spaces. 3.1 Schedule of requirements. Accessory off-street parking spaces, open or enclosed, shall be provided for any lot as specified in Article 4—Zoning Bulk and Parking Regulations, or as specified below for each use in any zone, whichever is greater. (a) Exceptions. i. Where Article 3—District Regulations, specifies a minimum parking requirement, this parking requirement shall prevail. ii. For existing buildings within the C-2 zoning district, the requirements of Article 4, Section 4.14—C-1, C-1A, C-2, C-2A zones, bulk and parking regulations governing the C-2 zoning district shall prevail. iii. For new construction within the downtown redevelopment target area, as described in appendix C of the Dover Code of Ordinances, there is no minimum off-street parking requirement based on use. To utilize this exception, a parking strategy statement must be submitted for review as part of the site development plan approval required by appendix B, zoning, article 10, section 2. For: At Least One Parking Space For Each Places of worship Two hundred (200) square feet of floor area, but not less than one (1) space for each four (4) seats, where provided Libraries Three hundred (300) square feet of floor area Medical offices—All types Three hundred (300) square feet of floor area Nursery school or kindergarten Adult attendant, plus one for every 20 children Page 28

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 11 For: At Least One Parking Space For Each Elementary or junior high school Eight (8) seats in main auditorium/cafeteria or gymnasium High school, technical school, college or Five (5) seats in main auditorium/cafeteria or university gymnasium; if none, see Article 4—Zoning, Bulk and Parking Regulations Hospitals or sanitariums Three beds Apartments Two (2) per dwelling unit and one (1) for every two hundred (200) square feet of office space and 0.25 per dwelling unit for visitor space Roominghouses Guestroom Dormitories Three (3) beds Eating and drinking places Four (4) seats plus one (1) for every three (3) bar seats Funeral homes Two (2) employees, plus five (5) spaces for each chapel Hotels and motels Guestroom, plus one (1) for every 200 square feet of office space, banquet hall, or meeting areas Athletic fields, baseball, football or Three (3) seats boxing stadiums and arenas; race tracks Golf courses Per employee and four (4) parking spaces for each hole Golf or baseball driving range One-half (½) stall Airports Per employee and for each two (2) airplanes in storage 3.2 Areas computed as parking spaces. Areas which may be computed as open or enclosed off- street parking spaces include any private garage, carport, or other area available for parking, other than a street or driveway. However, a driveway within a required front yard for a one- family or two-family residence may count as one parking space, other than a corner lot as provided in article 5, section 1.3. 3.3 Location and ownership of required accessory parking facilities. Required accessory parking spaces, open or enclosed, may be provided upon the same lot as the use to which they Page 29

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 12 are accessory, or elsewhere, provided all spaces therein are located within 150 feet walking distance of such lot. In all cases, such parking spaces shall conform to the regulations of the district in which they are accessory and shall be subject to deed restriction, filed with the city clerk, binding the owner and his heirs and assigns to maintain the required number of spaces available either: (a) Throughout the existence of such use to which they are accessory; or (b) Until such spaces are provided elsewhere. 3.4 Size of spaces. The minimum parking space dimensions shall be at least nine (9) feet in width and at least 18 feet in length. Disabled accessible spaces shall meet ADA requirements. 3.5 Access. Unobstructed access to and from a street shall be provided. Each drive lane shall have at least ten feet of width so that one-way drives have at least ten feet of width and that two-directional drives have two lanes of ten feet each. Unless otherwise specified within this section, access shall be provided by at least one two-directional drive lane or two one- directional drive lanes. 3.6 Drainage and surfacing. (a) All open permanent parking areas and access drives shall be properly drained, and all such areas shall be provided with paved asphalt, concrete or other hard, paved, dust - free surface. (b) All permanent parking areas shall be enclosed with upright concrete curbing at least six inches in height. The city planner may relax this requirement for a portion of a parking area when there is a demonstrated need to convey stormwater to a proposed or approved stormwater management area. Curbing shall not be required for loading areas, handicapped access and for parking spaces accessory to a one-family or two-family residence (see also article 6, section 5.3). 3.7 Joint facilities. Required parking spaces, open or enclosed, may be provided in spaces designed to serve, jointly, two or more establishments, whether or not located on the same lot, provided that the number of required spaces in such joint facilities shall be not less than the total required for all such establishments. 3.8 Combined spaces. When any lot contains two or more uses having different parking requirements, the parking requirements for each use shall apply to the extent of that use. Where it can be conclusively demonstrated that one or more such uses will be generating a demand for parking spaces primarily during periods when the other use or uses is not or are not in operation, the planning commission may reduce the total parking spaces required for that use with the least requirement. (a) Campus Parking Plan. When a new building or building addition is made to a campus involving multiple buildings under common ownership where one or more of the uses will be generating demand for parking when the other use or uses are not in operation, the applicant shall present a campus parking plan as a part of the site Page 30

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 13 development plan that includes an analysis of the parking needs based on the provisions of section 3.8 of this article. 3.9 Adjustments to parking requirements. The planning commission or city planner, according to the type of plan review required by appendix B, zoning, article 10, planning commission, may reduce, in an amount not to exceed 50 percent, the number of parking spaces required when, in the opinion of the commission, it has been demonstrated that the use is adequately served by transportation and parking alternatives, including but not limited to: (a) Site plan proposals within the downtown redevelopment target area, as described in appendix C of the Dover Code of Ordinances, may be granted a 20 percent reduction in the amount of off-street parking normally required, due to the availability of mass transit, municipal parking and existing pedestrian amenities. (b) Designated off-street parking reserved for car pools, van pools, and bicycle parking facilities, in accordance with the following schedule: (1) Each carpool space shall be equivalent to three standard parking spaces. (2) Each vanpool space shall be equivalent to five standard parking spaces. (3) Every group of five bicycle parking spaces shall be equivalent to one standard parking space. (c) Employer participation in a traffic-mitigation plan approved by the Delaware Department of Transportation. (d) Cash-in-lieu of parking contributions toward the capital construction or improvement of municipal parking facilities that are proposed. The cash-in-lieu of parking contribution shall be in a monetary amount equivalent to the estimated cost of construction for the number of standard surface parking spaces for which the reduction is sought. To take advantage of this option, the developer shall submit to the city engineer a cost estimate for the parking requested to be waived. The city engineer shall examine the estimate for accuracy in current prevailing costs of construction at the time of proposal and shall report to the planning commission his/her findings. (e) Proposals involving superior urban design which contribute to an enhanced pedestrian environment, and which include such features as pedestrian plazas and pocket-parks, pedestrian-way connections with existing sidewalk systems and community facilities, park benches and other street furniture, mass transit connections and shelters, and landscaping and shade tree plantings. In all areas, except the downtown redevelopment target area, the planning commission or city planner, according to the type of plan review required by appendix B, zoning, article 10, planning commission, may require the development plans to have an area of open space designated where parking could be constructed less than or equal to the number being reduced. In such cases the plan shall bear a note which explains that the petitioner, in accepting a parking reduction, agrees to construct such additional parking as is otherwise required under the provisions of this appendix, if the planning commission, after a hearing, determines that the Page 31

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 14 reasons for granting said reduction no longer exist. In all such instances where the planning commission determines that the reasons for granting a reduction no longer exist, the owner of record for the subject property for which a reduction was previously granted must construct the parking required to meet the regulations of the city during the next construction season. 3.10 Bicycle parking. Bicycle parking shall be provided for parking spaces at a rate of one bicycle parking space for every 20 parking spaces or a fraction thereof. The planning commission may waive the requirement for the bicycle parking if it is demonstrated that bicycle parking would not be appropriate for safety reasons or due to the nature of the use of the site. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 12 – Definitions be amended to read as follows: Live-work unit: A first floor business use, such as an office, studio, shop, café, service establishment, personal service establishment, or other permitted use in combination with an office and a dwelling unit located above such place of business. A person or persons other than the proprietor of the first floor business may occupy the dwelling unit portion of a Live-work unit. ADOPTED: March 11, 2024 ORDINANCE/FINAL READING – PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. #2024-03 – COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2024 - CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO MAP 12-1: LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider the Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2024 – Consideration of Amendment to Map 12-1: Land Development Plan Map. Council President Hare reminded members of the public that copies of the proposed ordinance were available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or on the City's website at www.cityofdover.com under "Government. Mr. Neil moved that the Final Reading of the proposed ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury, and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of January 22, 2024.) Ms. Dawn Melson-Williams, Principal Planner briefed members on Proposed Ordinance No. #2024-03 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2024 – Consideration of Amendment to Map 12-1: Land Development Plan Map. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the current consideration does not entail outlining a development plan for a specific parcel. Instead, it focuses on the general land use classification and planning for traffic and road improvements in the area. Ms. Melson- Williams explained that this would be part of any kind of site development plan review process Page 32

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 15 and that Silver Lake Boulevard, she believes, is a city-maintained street. Ms. Melson-Williams further explained that their Public Works Office and Department of Water Wastewater would provide regulatory comments regarding any future development of the parcel in question, as well as other parcels in the City of Dover, when the time comes. Responding to Ms. Melson-Williams, Mr. Anderson stated that a goal of mixed land use is "to encourage the creation of neighborhood centers" and that within the close-knit neighborhood fabric, there are opportunities for the creation of urban centers. Mr. Anderson explained that these centers should be established along major roadways and feature mixed-use development. He questioned how this concept would fit in with the current discussion, as the area in question is anything but a major roadway; it is a small neighborhood cul-de-sac and dead end. The area in question includes a nursing home with medical and ambulance traffic going in and out. Council President Hare declared the hearing open at 7:42 p.m. Kyle Burchard with Mountain Consulting, 103 South Bradford Street stated that he is requesting to amend the Comprehensive Plan designation of the property from office to mixed-use. Mr. Burchard explained that this is the seed of an idea for a development that requires this as part of the process. It begins with the land, and these amenities are highly desirable for residential purposes, making it a potentially good investment for some retail commercial development as well. Mr. Burchard further explained that the road system is a concern, and the development is restricted by what the road system and walkways can accommodate. This would go through the city’s review process out of Walker Road. Additionally, there will be impact studies required through DelDOT as part of the site plan review process. Mr. Burchard expressed eagerness to make the necessary mitigation adjustments to ensure that the roadway is adequate and appropriate for the community. Nick Patel, with Equitable Ownership, 1671 South State Street, stated that there are some growing concerns that a few City Council members have brought up previously, as well as some residents, regarding the rezoning. Especially since there has not been any real discussion about the potential proposed project. Mr. Patel explained that they would love to provide details, but they do not have a clear vision of what they would like to see there. Until the rezoning is approved, they cannot begin to formulate any concrete plans or ideas for the area. Mr. Patel further explained that the goal is to develop a mixed-use project that includes residential housing and community retail, offering grocery stores, dining options, entertainment venues, and other community-accessible amenities. The plan also includes the creation of walkways and spaces where community members can walk their dogs or take their kids for a stroll. Mr. Patel stated that they understand and acknowledge that many concerns revolve around increased traffic. He emphasized their commitment to working with the relevant agencies to study these impacts thoroughly and to seek solutions that minimize disruptions to the council and residents. Mr. Patel further stated that whether the property is developed with the current zoning type, or the new zoning type requested, an increase in traffic is inevitable. Mr. Patel explained that they are looking to introduce a vibrant mix of residential and commercial spaces. This endeavor seeks not to alter the community’s essence, but to enrich it, respecting the city’s growth aspirations and leveraging the potential of this well-placed parcel. Mr. Patel believes that this will have a positive impact on the community. Page 33

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 16 Kathy Masser, 937 Silver Lake Boulevard, stated that there are two important factors that have not been mentioned. First, the area is residential, and the road ends in a cul-de-sac with a speed limit of only 25 miles per hour. There are school buses that pick up and drop off kids right on the street, and children are often riding their bikes and playing in the area. Ms. Masser further stated that she has great concern about the potential traffic implications of any building in the area and how it might disrupt safety. Ms. Masser explained that second important factor is that the property backs right onto Silver Lake. She noted that the wildlife in the area has increased, including herons, water birds, owls, and their families, but the main concern is the presence of bald eagles. Ms. Masser further explained that if they build either too high or too close to the end, it could disrupt the wildlife habitat and might even violate the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Ms. Masser clarified that she is not opposed to the building itself or to supporting it, but she would need to know specific details such as its height, proximity to other structures, and its purpose before she could endorse a change in zoning. Michael Braun,18 Wimbledon Drive, stated that he was troubled when he learned after the meeting that the zoning request violated the Comprehensive Plan. This information was not mentioned during the meeting, and he noted that there is a separate agenda item or process to change the Comprehensive Plan. Edward Dougherty, 25 Lotus Street, stated that there are traffic, speed, and safety concerns. Nikko Brady, 973 Silver Lake Boulevard, stated that the city had initiated the 18-month clock for amending the Comprehensive Plan. However, given the dates of the Planning Commission hearing, the City Council Meeting, and the first reading of the amendment, all of which fall outside of the 18-month timeframe, there may be an issue with the timing of the process. Crystal Dyke, 16 Representative Lane, stated that she speaks against this item because this is a safety concern. Ms. Dyke explained that this is a small, close-knit community, and constructing a mixed development could potentially bring unwanted traffic and individuals who may disrupt the community. She expressed concern about the impact on the surrounding area where the nursing home and corporate offices are located. Ms. Dyke expressed concern about the impact on wildlife, noting that there is a lot of wildlife in the area. She feels that building on the available land would take away their homes as well. Ms. Dyke suggested that if there is a desire to build something in the area, it should be a development for the youth. Eugene Davis, 6 Representative Lane, stated that the main issue and concern is public safety, and that they do not need any suspicious characters back where they live. Mr. Davis further stated that they need a clearer answer to what is going to happen there. Karen Waters McGee, 43 Representative Lane, stated that she opposes Comprehensive Planned Amendment 2024-03, which aims to revise the plan to allow the vacant lot to be changed to a mixed-use area. She reiterated her opposition to revising the plan for this purpose and stated that she will also oppose the next item on the agenda. Toby Jackson Oakley, 12 Representative Lane, expressed concern about the potential increase in Page 34

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 17 traffic and the number of people going to the area. She also voiced concerns about the impact on the habitat. Ms. Oakley further stated that as far as the road structure goes, the infrastructure cannot make another outlet out of there because the lake is there. They would have to come back through the neighborhood where all the kids play and where they are just trying to have a life. Shelly Heath, 16 Silver Lake Representative Lane, stated that she is concerned about the potential impact on the nursing home. Ms. Heath explained that the residents, who are preparing to transition to another stage of life, may not find calmness or readiness if there is busy traffic, safety issues, and noise due to new construction in the area. Jill Quick, 27 Representative Lane expressed concerns about the safety of children in the area. She also voiced concerns about the potential impact of a retail establishment in the area, noting that it is not an appropriate location, especially near Silver Lake. Ms. Quick emphasized that their neighborhood is beautiful, and with more retail businesses, there is an increase in litter and pedestrian traffic. She stated that she does not support a mixed-use development in the area. Dana Lyman, 961 Silver Lake Road, stated that mixed-use is not appropriate for the area. Mr. Lyman suggested that if there is a need to repurpose something in the area, they should consider converting the credit union into additional office space as needed. Angela West, 971 Silver Lake Boulevard, stated that the intentions for development on the property of any kind of mixed-use property will negatively impact the quality of life for all the residents. Ms. West explained that those speaking in favor of this proposal do not reside in the affected area, and any development would directly impact the residents' front and backyards. An increase in population, consumers, or office workers would lead to increased pollution, trespassing, and worsened traffic conditions. Council President Hare declared the hearing closed at 8:13 p.m. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Hare stated that Mr. Rodriguez indicated that his question is not pertinent to this motion. Responding to Dr. Pillsbury, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that currently the property is zoned CPO which stands for Commercial Professional Office. explained that according to the CPO (Commercial Planned Office) zoning ordinance, permitted uses include business, professional, or government offices, banks, medical facilities, laboratories, drive-in facilities, accessory uses related to permitted uses, and uses that are allowed outright. Ms. Melson-Williams further explained that there are a series of conditional uses, which require a special review process with the Planning Commission for approval. These uses include cafeterias, restaurants, barbershops, beauty shops, copy centers, office supply stores, retail stores, newsstands, spas, health clubs, and associated laboratories that are not related to medical uses. Accessory uses to a permitted use on the same lot are allowed if there is already an office, a bank, and a medical lab on the property. Additionally, conditional uses that are on the residential side would need to undergo a special review process in the CPO zone. The CPO zoning, as it currently stands, is designated for office use. However, there are other potential uses that could be developed through the conditional use process if the Planning Commission deems it appropriate. In any case, development on this tract Page 35

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 18 of land would likely be subject to a site development plan that requires Planning Commission review. Currently under consideration is the Comprehensive Plan amendment, which relates to the land use classification. Responding to Ms. Melson-Williams, Dr. Pillsbury stated that the zoning category, being commercial and professional office, is somewhat misleading. She expressed that if it were solely for office use, it would be easier to understand everyone's concerns. However, based on the description of a CPO, there is a lot of concern regarding that zoning designation. Mr. Anderson stated that he would like to see an opportunity for the community to come together. He acknowledged that some community members are looking to invest in the area and want to ensure they have a fair chance at proposing something acceptable to the community. However, he voiced skepticism about the appropriateness of mixed-use zoning, as it could open the area to being rezoned in various ways. Mr. Anderson further explained that changing the comprehensive plan is a significant decision that can only be done once a year. He emphasized the importance of community input in this process. Due to these considerations, he moved deferring this item for 30 days. Mr. Anderson moved to defer Proposed Ordinance No. #2024-03 for 30 days, seconded by Mr. Sudler, and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Anderson explained that the reason for the deferral would be to allow the community and developers to come together and understand each other's perspectives better. He emphasized the importance of fostering a willingness among all parties to collaborate and reach a mutual understanding of their respective goals. Mr. Anderson stated that this could be a whole different discussion in 30 days if they are allowed to do that, but if not, they have nothing to lose, but 30 days can make a big difference. Mr. Neil stated that before making any decisions in the next 30 days, they should carefully consider the potential impact of this project, as it could be an extremely important addition to their neighborhood. Ms. Arndt stated that she has seen conversations with the city solicitor and just wanted to get the solicitor’s opinion on whether it would be appropriate to defer this motion for these reasons. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Hare stated that it is acceptable. Ms. Arndt stated that she would rather see it as something for the residents to use and enjoy. ORDINANCE/FINAL READING – PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. #2024-04 – LANDS OF DOVER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AT 1079 SILVER LAKE BOULEVARD: CPO TO C-2A A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider the Proposed Ordinance No. 2024-04 – Lands of Dover Federal Credit Union at 1079 Silver Lake Boulevard: CPO to C- 2A. Council President Hare reminded members of the public that copies of the proposed ordinance were available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or on the City's website at Page 36

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 19 www.cityofdover.com under "Government. The First Reading of the proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of January 22, 2024. Mr. Hare stated that council cannot consider changing the zoning from CPO to C-2A because they did not consider the first item. As Mr. Rodriguez pointed out, they are not permitted to do so. Therefore, council will need to defer this decision as well, in alignment with the decision regarding item number three (3). Mr. Sudler moved to defer Proposed Ordinance No. #2024-04 for 30 days, seconded by Mr. Neil, and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Sudler stated that Councilman Anderson, Councilman Boggerty, and himself are willing to facilitate a meeting between the developers, property owners, and the community. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 26, 2024 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 26, 2024, were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Neil, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury, and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT – FEBRUARY 27, 2024 The Council Committee of the Whole met on February 27, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. with Council President Hare presiding. Members of Council present were Mr. Anderson, Ms. Arndt, Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Neil, Dr. Pillsbury, Mr. Rocha, and Mr. Sudler. Mayor Christiansen was absent. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Ms. Smack (Safety, Advisory, and Transportation), Mr. Shevock (via WebEx) (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). Dr. Jackson-Short (Safety, Advisory, and Transportation), and Ms. Smith (Legislative, Finance and Administration) were absent. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. SAFETY, ADVISORY, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE The Safety, Advisory, and Transportation Committee met with Chairman Lewis presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Lewis requested to remove Item #2 – Citizen Concern over Safety Issues in Towne Point, as the citizen who initiated the item being put on the agenda chose to not speak publicly. Page 37

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 20 Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. Quarterly Briefing on Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Projects (Marilyn Smith, Executive Director of the Dover/Kent County MPO) Ms. Marilyn Smith, Executive Director of the Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), provided a quarterly briefing on Dover/Kent County MPO Projects. Committee Action Not Required. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Smith stated they have applied for a Rail Corridor Identification Grant in partnership with DelDOT, DART, WILMAPCO, and Salisbury/Wicomico MPO. Ms. Smith stated that they received a $500,000 grant to do the study however, since there is no identified passenger corridor operating right now, one must be identified. Ms. Smith explained that because DART was the applicant, they had to sign the agreement with the Federal Highway Administration. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Smith stated that the study should take 12 to 16 months to complete, once the federal contracts are in place. Ms. Smith explained that would put them at a year to a year and a half before they have a finalized study with recommendations. Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Ms. Smith stated that in the Downtown Dover Pathways study, they are focusing on bike, pedestrian, and micro-mobility. Ms. Smith noted that micro-mobility includes electronic scooters. Ms. Smith explained that there will be a chapter that talks about micro-mobility including ebikes as well, and then shows how they could be implemented. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Smith stated that she is not sure what kind of funding is available for elevating the railroad tracks but if that is something that the city would like to pursue, then there would need to be a conversation with the Federal Railroad Administration. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Smith stated that the Bay Road Path & Walking Trail Connections study went from Chesapeake Utilities, onto Bay Road, down Bay Road, and then provided a safe crossing over to DelDOT. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Smith stated that if there is a specific section of trail that he has concerns with, they would have to find out who the trail sponsor is. Ms. Smith explained that the sponsors can be DNREC, DelDOT, the county, or a municipality. Ms. Smith also stated that when they recommend new trails or new connections, they include lighting as a part of the development to make sure the trail is safe. Page 38

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 21 Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Smith stated that in the meantime to help aid the need for truck parking, DelDOT created a flyer that provides some preferred truck parking areas. They are trying to get the word out to truck drivers that parking exists, and some are in Dover and Kent County. Ms. Smith explained that DelDOT has re-striped some truck parking spaces at the DMV and a couple of park-and-ride locations. Ms. Smith stated that their GIS mapper is working on pulling parcels that are owned by private landowners and could potentially be designated as temporary truck parking spaces. Ms. Smith explained that there is an RFP out to make significant upgrades to the Smyrna rest area so that it can accommodate more truck parking. Mr. Lewis moved for adjournment of the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 6:39 p.m. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Chairman Anderson presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried. Discussion – Establishing a Conduit Bond Program (Emilie Ninan, Partner at Ballad Spahr) Ms. Emilie Ninan, Partner at Ballad Spahr, reviewed the presentation entitled, Using Conduit Tax-Exempt Bonds to Finance Capital Projects. Committee recommended referring to staff for the next steps. Responding to Mr. Neil, Ms. Ninan stated that the bank is lending the money based on their credit. The city would not have any responsibility as a conduit issuer to repay the debt because the city is not giving them any of their credit for them to obtain the lower rate. Ms. Ninan explained that the only thing to be concerned about as the issuer is the reputational risk and whether the city wants to be associated with that borrower. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Ninan stated that in some counties, the whole council is the approver. Ms. Ninan explained that if the President is selected by the members, then they are not considered elected as President, so the whole council would be the approver. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Ninan stated that they would ask for a commitment letter indicating that there is interest in the market for the requested type of bonds. Ms. Ninan explained that council would not want to spend their Page 39

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 22 time considering an application for someone with wishful thinking. Instead, council would want them to have a real project that can pass the credit scrutiny. Mr. Neil moved to refer to staff for further development and consideration. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sudler and unanimously carried. Update from the General Employee Pension Plan and Committee Report (Bob Gedney, General Employee Pension Chair, and Christina Kober, City of Dover Retiree) Mr. Bob Gedney, General Employee Pension Chair, and Christina Kober, City of Dover Retiree and General Employee Pension Board member reviewed an update from the General Employee Pension Plan. Committee Action Not Required. Mr. Sudler expressed gratitude to the retirees for their dedication. Mr. Sudler explained that council is committed to showing that they value all employees, past and present. Mr. Anderson mentioned that there will be legislation on a future agenda to address the concerns of pensioners. Mr. Anderson stated that the actuary numbers should be in for the workshop and that they will be available for the committee meeting in March. Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Ms. Kober stated that the link he provided did not have any assistance information available for her to pass on, but she appreciated the help. Ms. Arndt expressed concern with the 25.5% cost of living adjustment and explained that she would need to see all the data before making any decisions. Dr. Pillsbury stated that 25% is what they did not receive over the past seven or eight years. Dr. Pillsbury explained that they have taken the percentages each year and added them up to come up with 25%. Mr. Anderson mentioned that the city's actuary, with whom they contract, has reviewed the numbers, and arrived at a figure close to what is being requested. He emphasized that the requested amount is not unreasonable. He also explained that once the numbers are back for the workshop meeting, they will review several proposals from staff before committing to anything they cannot fulfill. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Anderson stated that regarding the pension COLA and the proposed retitling and regrading one will not take away from the other. Mr. Anderson stated that council is not breaking the budget to make the changes for this year. Page 40

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 23 Responding to Ms. Kober, Mr. Anderson stated that he has not been provided with the report but anticipates that they will be talking about it on Friday at the workshop. Responding to Mr. Gedney, Mr. Anderson stated that council will have the report by March 1st. Proposed Ordinance #2024-02 – Amending Chapter 106 – Traffic and Vehicles, Sec. 106-136 – On-street disabled parking (Councilman Neil and Councilwoman Arndt) Mr. Neil reviewed the background and proposed changes to the proposed Ordinance #2024-02. Staff recommended approval of Ordinance #2024-02. Mr. Neil moved to include the staff amendments. The motion was seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Hugg stated that the City Clerk’s Office has researched and made the proposed changes. He did not want to have more than one person calling to try to get different answers. Mr. Hugg explained that he has the contact information for the Council on Disabilities of the State, which is a State ADA Administrator. However, he has not taken any further steps knowing that Mr. Neil, Ms. Arndt, and the Clerk’s Office were doing the research. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Neil clarified that the changes to the city's code were intended to add extra information, emphasizing that anyone requesting a parking spot would be granted one if the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) approved. He noted that the ordinance detailed existing city code requirements, responsibilities regarding curb cuts, and other provisions aligning with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Mr. Neil, who has 20 years of experience in vocational rehab, reassured that the changes were not meant to harm the individuals he had previously assisted. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Hugg stated that the city does not have an ADA Coordinator in the sense that Mr. Lewis asked. Mr. Hugg explained that the city has an individual who is responsible for ensuring that anything the city does by way of contracting or construction, including streets and curb cuts, meets ADA standards. Mr. Hugg stated that it is not their responsibility to determine if someone is eligible for a placard. Mr. Hugg explained that the Public Works Department is the entity that issues the handicapped spaces and they do that following the ADA requirements of depth and width. Page 41

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 24 Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Hugg stated that if an individual walks into the Public Works Department with a DMV certificate along with the various forms stating that they meet the requirements, Public Works will go out and paint the space. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Neil clarified that if a resident has a driveway, they do not need two placards. However, if they have a driveway and one parking spot, they will need two placards. If they do not have access to a driveway but have two placards, they would have two parking spots. He explained that the changes primarily focus on driveway access, specifying responsibilities for ensuring ADA compatibility. Andria Bennett, City Clerk stated that the staff amendment was added at the request of Mark Nowak, Public Work’s Director because a lot of times when there is a disabled spot in front of someone's home, they think that they own that spot. Ms. Bennett clarified that even if someone has requested a parking space and it is in front of their home, they do not own the space. Anyone with a placard indicating a need for accessible parking may rightfully park in that space. Mr. Boggerty expressed his concerns with not being able to assign a requested parking spot in a non-residential area to the disabled person who requested the space. Mr. Boggerty stated that 30 years ago, the slope of the driveway may not have been an issue. Now it is for someone using a walker or wheelchair and they should be able to have rights to the spot that they requested. Mr. Boggerty emphasized that it is not a matter of whether an altercation will occur, but rather when it will happen. Mr. Sudler agreed with Mr. Boggerty and Mr. Lewis and stated he feels that there is a need for a more expert viewpoint and opinion on the matter. Mr. Sudler questioned how many complaints were received and were the complaints made in writing. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Neil stated that there are a series of emails that have transpired with the person making the complaint. Mr. Neil explained that Ms. Arndt and Mr. Boggerty were able to review the emails and Mr. Boggerty also met with the person. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Neil stated that if they have a driveway, one person can still have the parking spot, and two placards are needed. Mr. Neil explained that two people need two parking spots, and one person needs one parking spot. Mr. Neil stated that if they have a placard and the placard runs out then the parking spot will disappear. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Neil stated that when the placard expires the spot should disappear unless they renew the placard. Page 42

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 25 Sharon Duca, Assistant City Manager stated that the program in the Public Works Department has been around for some time. Ms. Duca explained that typically a resident would call in requesting a spot to be designated on their road. Ms. Duca stated that the residents would be asked to come in to show their identification, and the placard, and give their address. Ms. Duca explained that the Streets Supervisor or another member of the Streets Division would then go out to the site and evaluate if a spot could be placed there. Ms. Duca stated that the resident would then be contacted with the verdict if the spot would fit, and the city would paint the spot. Ms. Duca explained that the Public Works Department has started tracking the spots through the GIS system so that they have a list of all the spots because they must be repainted on a certain frequency. Also, so that they can check expired tags, in which case they would contact the resident for an updated record. Responding to Dr. Pillsbury, Ms. Duca stated that if they both want to have a greater probability of getting a spot, then they both should request a spot. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Duca stated that because there have been other people who have requested designated spots not related to this, council would have to move to allow into code to have individually designated spots. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Duca stated that the way the code is written, they would have the one in the driveway and then the one on the street. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Duca stated that even though it is not addressed in the code, if the city were to evaluate a personal driveway, they would have to look for an ADA-accessible route from each parking spot. Therefore, to get from their parking spot, they would still need to use their driveway to get to the front door or sidewalk, which may or may not follow the slope requirements. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Duca stated that Public Works does not enforce who is parking in the space but if someone has a placard, then they are allowed to park there. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Duca stated that none of the spots are designated solely for anyone in particular. Ms. Arndt stated that the reason the text was added in green at the end was that it stated that disabled parking spaces on public streets and parking lots are for public use for validated placarded vehicles, not for personal or private use. Ms. Arndt explained that if there is a handicapped space and they hold a handicapped placard, they can park there regardless of whether they were the ones who sought to have the space put there. Ms. Arndt stated that the intent was to preserve the opportunities, in that folks who have an accessible option on their property that they could use, that they would then not need to use the public space on the public street that someone else might need for public space handicapped parking. Ms. Page 43

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 26 Arndt stated that they would then use their property, their driveway, or their parking pad and that would constitute their opportunity to have an ADA- compliant place to park and to preserve additional space on the street. Ms. Arndt explained that the proposed changes are for those who have space where they could park on their property, but still choose to get a handicapped placard and a space on the street in front of their home. Which in turn, will then take away space that others could use. Ms. Arndt stated that the proposed changes are just trying to encourage people to park on their property and not on the street. William Faust, 136 Orchard Avenue, Dover, expressed his concerns with the enforcement of the abuse related to the use of handicapped placards. Ron Krause stated that the appropriate term and the term used in state legislation is accessible parking space, not disabled or handicapped. Mr. Krause also stated that the Mid-Atlantic ADA would be a great resource. Arielle Rivera, Assistant City Clerk, read into the record the opposition letter from Mr. Richard Senato (Attachment #1). Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of the staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Ms. Arndt. Mr. Rocha stated that the terms handicapped and disabled are outdated and that he believes based on the recommendation that they should be changed to accessible. Mr. Rocha moved to make an amendment to update the ordinance recommendation to remove the terms handicapped and disabled and replace them with accessible or the term that is the preference of what the ADA recommends. Mr. Neil and Ms. Arndt stated that they are amendable to the changes. Ms. Bennett stated that the original email from Mr. Neil included emails from constituents as well as information from different municipalities that were suggested. One of the suggested ordinance changes was too stringent and one was not stringent enough. Ms. Bennett explained that the email suggested that there was a situation going on in one of the communities and it concerned more than one person. Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of the staff recommendations with the requested changes. The motion was seconded by Ms. Arndt and carried by a roll call vote of seven (7) yes (Boggerty, Neil, Rocha, Arndt, Anderson, Hare, and Shevock), three (3) no (Pillsbury, Sudler, and Lewis), and one (1) absent (Smith). By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Page 44

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 27 Procedure for the City Manager When Meeting with Legislators (Councilman Rocha) Mr. Rocha reviewed the background for the proposed procedure for the City Manager when meeting with legislators. Staff recommended adoption of the procedure. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Rocha explained that the procedure is for formal meetings to ensure that everyone is on the same page. He emphasized that if a council member has heard the information during meetings and understands the direction, they will not be blindsided by the information. Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Rocha stated that the policy would not apply to a meeting on the street, it would be for official meetings between the City Manager and Legislators. Mr. Boggerty expressed concerns about limiting the number of council members present to not have a potential quorum and what constitutes a formal meeting. Mr. Sudler stated that he feels Mr. Rocha intended to create a policy that is as simple as council receiving an informal notice such as an email or memorandum, stating that he will be meeting with a Legislator, and they will be discussing whatever the topic may be. Mr. Sudler stated that if council knows that the City Manager is scheduled to meet with Legislators, council can then follow up on how the meeting went and what his thoughts are. Mr. Sudler explained that based on their form of government, this policy would help make council aware that the City Manager is meeting with Legislators about these specific topics so that council is aware when they are approached by legislators. Mr. Hugg expressed appreciation for the improved communication with council. He shared an experience where he was approached by a legislator on a topic that blindsided him, highlighting the challenge of staying informed. Mr. Hugg, who has been in local government for a long time, mentioned that he sometimes runs into legislators during lunch and has conversations that he may not be able to relay to the council ahead of time. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Mr. Rocha clarified that the policy was not intended to suggest Mr. Hugg was not doing a good job. He explained that the policy was unrelated to chance encounters with legislators but rather focused on ensuring that if Mr. Hugg were to convene a meeting with the Governor's Aides and legislators, someone from the council should be aware or invited. Mr. Rocha expressed willingness to adjust the language of the policy as needed. Ms. Arndt emphasized that council sets the vision and goals, and Mr. Hugg's work is crucial in realizing those objectives. She suggested that it might be beneficial for the council to receive a synopsis after the meetings to help them feel more informed. She mentioned a previous City Manager who sent out weekly Page 45

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 28 review emails summarizing meetings and discussions, which she found helpful in staying informed and connected with the city's progress. Mr. Hugg stated that he has made sure that council will be included in the League of Local Government emails. Mr. Hugg also stated that he will make sure to summarize weekly what he has been involved in. Mr. Hare interpreted the proposed policy as allowing the Council President to request a specific council person to attend a meeting where the City Manager plans to be present and where that council person may have relevant experience. Mr. Neil expressed concerns about micromanaging the City Manager. Mr. Neil stated that if more communication is what council wants then council can simply ask that the City Manager communicate more with a verbal request. Dr. Pillsbury suggested that council provide Mr. Hugg with a list of their expertise. Dr. Pillsbury stated that it is not appropriate for meetings to be scheduled and council to be excluded. Dr. Pillsbury stated that the council members all have different expertise and could be of value to Mr. Hugg and the Mayor in doing their job effectively. Mr. Sudler emphasized that the council is seeking increased transparency and engagement with the City Manager. He stated that the council is engaged, educated, and wants to be involved in the decision-making process. While acknowledging that the City Manager is the boss of the department heads, Mr. Sudler stressed that the council wants to be actively involved and engaged in city affairs. Mr. Neil moved to recommend tabling the policy to rework the language. The motion was seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried with Mr. Rocha voting no. By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Anderson stated that the author and the City Manager could work out the wording because the only issue was with the last sentence. Mr. Rocha stated he would work with Mr. Hugg to make the changes and bring it back on the future agenda. Consideration of Re-titling and Re-grading Positions (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager) David S. Hugg, III, City Manager reviewed the background and analysis of the re- titling and re-grading of the Accounts Payable Clerk and the Administrative Assistant to the Mayor. Page 46

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 29 Staff recommended approval of the re-titling and re-grading of the positions. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that support for the mayor and Kay Sass is being covered by Yvonne or himself. Mr. Hugg stated that handicaps the City Manager's office and they have asked Kay to do more of the clerical functions that the mayor’s office would handle. Mr. Sudler stated that when the wage study was done, it was stated that they were doing duties outside of the scope of their job description, so they were compensated for those duties. Mr. Sudler explained that his concern is that once those duties are relieved from them, will they still be making that amount of money, the same amount that they were making while doing those duties? Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that the Administrative Assistant to the mayor’s job description was a team effort between Kay, Yvonne, and Naomi because they did not have a good job description. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Patricia Marney, Interim Controller/Treasurer stated that the Accounts Payable position was reviewed by looking at the current account clerk job description, job descriptions for other municipalities, and looking at the job duties from the knowledge of those who have performed the job. Ms. Marney stated that the rest of the document was created by the Human Resources Department to the best of her knowledge. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Marney stated that the account clerk II position will be replaced with the accounts payable clerk, which has a higher education requirement. Ms. Marney explained that they reviewed the education requirements of Middletown, Milford, and Smyrna and that their educational component is the same as what was presented. Ms. Marney stated that the salary scale has already been worked into the current fiscal year budget. Ms. Marney explained that the individual who currently holds the Accounts Payable position is planning to retire in December and it is imperative that she be able to replace her. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg explained that the hiring process for the mayor’s position is similar to that of any other position in the city. Mr. Hugg stated that the position will be posted, there will be a selection committee that involves the Human Resources Department and someone in a similar position elsewhere in the city, and then there is usually a second and third person. After the job is posted, the Human Resources Department will determine qualified candidates, an interview panel will be convened, and the mayor will have the final hiring authority among the qualified candidates. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that both the Human Resources Department and the department heads are involved in creating the job descriptions. Mr. Hugg stated that the Human Resources Department drafts an outline and will loop in the department head or hiring manager to identify and confirm what the responsibilities are, and then in most cases, they are passed on to Page 47

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 30 him or the assistant city manager. Mr. Hugg explained that some of the education issues have come up over the years as the human resources world has evolved. Mr. Hugg stated that in the State, they are getting away from degree requirements and allowing agencies to look at experience and other skills. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that the mayor’s position is a budgeted position but not at the presented level. The mayor’s position is currently budgeted as an administrative assistant. Ms. Bennett reviewed the background and analysis of the Administrative Assistant to the City Clerk/City Council. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that the wage study that they are referring to is the one that Sharon took the lead on and got everyone moved into a more reasonable structure. Mr. Hugg explained that at the end of the wage study, they looked at various jobs that do not exist in other jurisdictions like the Executive Assistant to the City Manager, and people were doing those duties but not under that kind of title. Mr. Hugg stated that they did not make any adjustments to the City Clerk’s Office because they had not had any discussions about the evolution of the office. Mr. Hugg noted that the functional category of executive assistant exists across various departments under different titles. However, only the Executive Assistant in the City Manager's Office has been implemented so far, and this was done in the budget when the wage study was adopted. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that there were significant problems with the Segal study from both the credibility and the accuracy. Mr. Hugg explained that the study did not give a full-scale look at the city employees, so it did not have much influence on the assessments that they did. Mr. Hugg stated that if the assessments they did said someone should be a pay grade of 120 that is the scale they assigned. Mr. Hugg explained that was based on several factors, including the required skill set, job specifications, and how the position compared to similar roles in other jurisdictions that were considered during the review process. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that they started by comparing salary by salary and that is when the city came out 30% under the market. Mr. Hugg explained that then they made the adjustment based on the job specifications because of the difference in name compared to other municipalities. Mr. Hare moved to accept staff recommendations and approve the retitling and regrading of the positions. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson. By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Page 48

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 31 Responding to Mr. Neil, Ms. Bennett stated that the Mayor’s position would be changed from Administrative Assistant to Executive Assistant, then in the City Clerk’s office, the Administrative Assistant would be retitled and regraded to an Executive Assistant. Then with that process, the other three positions in the office must be regarded because of the hierarchy. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Hugg stated that there is minimal impact on the budget for the accounts payable clerk because there is not much difference in the pay scales. Mr. Hugg explained that there is sufficient money to pay for the positions as they are. Mr. Hugg stated that in approving the reclassifications there needs to be a second motion as to when they become effective so that it is clear if there will be a financial impact now or in next year's budget. Ms. Bennett stated that the City Clerk’s Office has salary savings from when the office had a vacant position. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that the Accounts Payable Clerk is critical to the reorganization of the Finance Department. Mr. Sudler moved to divide the question. Council moved to approve the Accounts Payable Clerk position. The motion was unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Neil moved to approve retitling the Administrative Assistant to the Mayor to Executive Assistant. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and carried with Mr. Lewis voting no. By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Council moved to approve the retitling and regrading of the Administrative Assistant to the City Clerk to Executive Assistant along with the other items in the memorandum. The motion was unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Sudler moved to recommend accepting the City Manager's recommendation to have the Accounts Payable Clerk position effective immediately. The motion was seconded by Mr. Boggerty and unanimously carried. Page 49

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 32 By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Boggerty moved to recommend the change of the Administrative Assistant to the mayor effective as of one (1) July. The motion was seconded by Ms. Arndt and carried with Mr. Lewis voting no. By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Anderson stated that if they decided to hire someone for the mayor’s position, that person would know that the position is going to be bumped up one (1) July. Mr. Boggerty moved to recommend that the Administrative Assistant to the City Clerk/Council and all of the positions included in the submission as recorded be effective one (1) July. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sudler and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Anderson moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 9:41 p.m. By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Hare moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 9:41 p.m. By consent agenda, Mr. Sudler moved for acceptance of the Council Committee of the Whole Report, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. ITEMS NOT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA SETTING OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS Mr. Hare stated that Staff recommends the 2024 property assessment appeal be scheduled for June 5th, 2024, through June 7th, 2024, from 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM, and one evening if needed. The hearing times are subject to change. Mr. Neil moved for approval of Staff recommendations for the Setting of the 2024 Property Assessment Appeals, seconded by Mr. Lewis and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and unanimously carried. ORDINANCES Page 50

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 33 ORDINANCE/FINAL READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-06 – AMENDING CHAPTER 102 – TAXATION, ARTICLE VIII – LODGING TAX (DAVID S. HUGG, III, CITY MANAGER, COUNCILMAN ANDERSON, AND COUNCILMAN NEIL) The First Reading of the Proposed Ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of February 12, 2024. Council President Hare reminded members of the public that copies of the proposed ordinance is available on the City’s website at www.cityofdover.com under “Government.” Mr. Neil moved that the Final Reading of the proposed ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Anderson, and unanimously carried. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Mr. Lewis stated that he read in the newspaper last Friday that Levy Court is looking to impose a 3% lodging tax. Mr. Lewis stated that his concern is that the City of Dover is in Kent County and if the County imposes a 3% lodging tax, this is going to be 6%. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Mr. Hugg clarified that his understanding is that the county could impose a hotel/motel tax on properties within the county but not within the City of Dover. Conversely, the City of Dover would not be able to impose a motel tax on properties outside its city limits. Mr. Hugg explained that they can confirm this is the case, and the county can impose a property tax that is countywide. He further explained that to his understanding, they cannot and would not be able to do this. Mr. Hugg stated that if the ordinance is approved tonight, the effective date would be July 1st, as requested by the Chamber of Commerce and the tourism representatives. By motion of Mr Neil, seconded by Ms. Arndt, Council, by a roll call vote of eight (8) yes (Anderson, Neil, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Lewis, and Hare) and one (1) absent (Boggerty) adopted Ordinance #2024-04 as follows: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: ARTICLE VII – Lodging Tax Sec. 102-190. – Local lodging tax. (a) A local lodging tax is hereby levied of up to three percent of the cost of the rent, in addition to the amount imposed by the state and the county, for any room or rooms in a hotel, motel or tourist home, as defined in 30 Del. C. §6101, within the boundaries of the city. The tax will be implemented beginning July 1, 2020, at the rate of one-half of one percent for 2020; one percent for 2021; and one and one-half percent for subsequent years ending upon the effective date of this ordinance. The tax shall be set at three percent effective 30 days after the adoption of this ordinance. (b) The local lodging tax, pursuant to this article, is the responsibility of the occupant of the room and shall be collected at the time the rental is paid. Operators of the hotel, motel or tourist Page 51

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 34 home are responsible for the collection of the local lodging tax and the remittance of the taxes to the city within 20 days after the end of each calendar month, in accordance with procedures established by the city manager and using forms designated by the city finance department. The tax imposed shall be shown on the billing to the occupant as a separate and distinct item. (c) Failure to remit the lodging tax due, shall result in an overdue balance statement from the city finance department based upon records of lodging tax paid to the State of Delaware for such period, and subject to penalty, license, or tax lien in accordance with city policies. (d) Alternatively, the city manager is authorized to engage the Delaware Division of Revenue to collect the city’s portion of the lodging tax simultaneously with the receipt of the state tax, to seek collection from operators, enforce rules relating to failure to file and failure to pay, and remit funds to the city. (e) The first one and one-half percent of lodging tax receipts will be accounted for in a committed fund balance account to be used only for infrastructure. (f) No local lodging tax pursuant to this article shall be collected for reservations or contracts for lodging executed or completed before July 1, 2020. ADOPTED: March 11, 2024 CITY MANAGER'S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Hugg had no announcements. MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Christiansen congratulated the Dover High School Varsity basketball team for winning the state championship. He announced that the Annual St. Patrick's Day Parade would take place on Saturday, March 16th, at 1:00 PM. Additionally, the Dover Bar Crawl was scheduled for March 16th, between 2:00 and 6:00 PM. Mayor Christiansen also mentioned that on March 19th, at 7:00 PM at Fairview Elementary School, the City of Dover Electric Department would be sponsoring an informational meeting for the neighborhoods of Woodcrest, Fairview, and Northwest Dover Heights regarding the demolition of the power plant and McKee Run. COUNCIL MEMBERS' ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Lewis wished everyone a Happy St. Patrick’s Day and to come out to the parade on Saturday, March 16th. He announced that an Easter Egg Event sponsored by Tracy Palmer Ministries, scheduled for Saturday, March 23rd, at the Murphy School. The event will run from 12:00 PM to 4:00 PM and is open to all members of the public. Mr. Sudler stated that the Mount Zion Ame Church is feeding the unsheltered every Wednesday of March at 101 North Queen Street, starting at 11:45 AM. Additionally, he congratulated Dover High School, noting that he graduated from Dover High and played varsity basketball for the school. He expressed his understanding of the significance of this achievement to the school's alumni and the City of Dover as a whole. Page 52

Item #7. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 11, 2024 PAGE 35 Mr. Anderson wished the citizens of the city and his colleagues a happy Women’s History Month. The meeting adjourned at 8:17 p.m. ANDRIA BENNETT CITY CLERK All ordinances, resolutions, motions, and orders adopted by the City Council during their Regular Meeting of March 11, 2024, are hereby approved. ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /AB Exhibits Exhibit #1 - Linda Parkowski - Letter in support of proposed Ordinance #2024-01 Exhibit #2 - Sarah E. Keifer - Letter in support of proposed Ordinance #2024-01 Exhibit #3 - Wesley Stefanick - Letter in support of proposed Ordinance #2024-01 Page 53

EXHIBIT #1 Regular City Council Meeting of 03/11/2024 Item #7. City of Dover Attn: Dover City Council 15 E. Loockerman Plaza Dover, DE 19901 March 4, 2024 Dear Dover City Council: Kent Economic Partnership (KEP), the economic development agency for Kent County, strongly supports the initiatives proposed by the Downtown Dover Partnership regarding Proposed Ordinance #2023-01, which seeks to amend Appendix B- Zoning, Article 30 District regulations, Section 13- Central Commercial Zone (C-2), and other relevant sections of the zoning ordinance. The proposed text amendments to the C-2 zoning, particularly those concerning the implementation of 6-foot step backs on floors above the 4th story and the requirement for developers or landlords to present a tailored parking strategy to meet the needs of tenants, will play a pivotal role in transforming Downtown Dover. These changes are anticipated to attract developers, businesses, and residents to the area, thereby contributing to its revitalization. The City Council’s approval is vital in ensuring that Downtown Dover receives the necessary backing to undergo its transformation. Thank you for the opportunity to provide support for the initiatives put forth by the Downtown Dover Partnership concerning the amendment of the Central Commercial Zone (C-2) text. Sincerely, Linda Parkowski Executive Director Page 54

EXHIBIT #2 Regular City Council Meeting of 03/11/2024 Item #7. Sarah E. Keifer 613 Fairview Avenue Dover, DE 19904 March 7, 2024 Dover City Council City Hall 15 Loockerman Plaza Dover, DE 19901 Dear Council Members: Please accept this letter of support for Ordinance #2024-01 regarding the regulations in the Central Commercial Zone (C-2) scheduled for final reading on Monday, March 11, 2024. As a homeowner in Dover, a land use planner, and a member of the Downtown Dover Partnership, I appreciate the effort of the Council and staff to develop the new development standards. The revisions are a necessary step in realizing the goals of the Downtown Dover Master Plan. The flexibility built into the ordinance affords property owners and developers the opportunity to fully meet market demands and bring new life into the city. I encourage the City Council to support Ordinance #2024-01and continue embracing such flexibility in future ordinance amendments. Again, thank you and the staff for your efforts. Sincerely, Sarah E. Keifer, AICP Page 55

EXHIBIT #3 Regular City Council Meeting ofItem 03/11/2024 #7. March 11, 2024 City Council City of Dover Sent via Email to: cityclerk@dover.de.us Dear Councilors: On behalf of the Delaware Association of REALTORS® and the Kent County Association of REALTORS®, I am writing to express our collective support for the recommended C2 zoning changes in downtown Dover—Proposed Ordinance #2024-01. With our headquarters being located downtown, we care about the future of our city, and we believe that these changes are necessary to improve the area and make it a destination once again. It is no secret that downtown Dover needs improvement, and we are convinced that the best way to start is through housing. However, to achieve the desired housing density, we need improved zoning regulations and creative solutions to these tough problems. That is why we are in favor of the proposed changes which include some of those solutions. Specifically, we believe that the removal of the parking requirement is hugely beneficial. Developers will set themselves up for success, and they know best how to deal with parking. Additionally, the increase in height from 6 to 10 stories allows for additional density, which is necessary to attract more people to live in the district. With more people living in the area, we can expect an increase in demand for services such as grocery, dining, entertainment, and more. This, in turn, will attract more businesses to the area, and the quantity and quality of those businesses will improve. Ultimately, we believe that these changes will make downtown Dover a destination once again. Thank you for your time, and I hope you will consider our views. Sincerely, Wes Wesley T. Stefanick Chief Executive Officer Page 56

Item #8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE The Council Committee of the Whole met on March 12, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. with Council President Hare presiding. Members of Council present were Ms. Arndt, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Neil, Dr. Pillsbury, and Mr. Rocha. Mr. Anderson, Mr. Boggerty, and Mr. Sudler were absent. Mayor Christiansen was also present. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Lewis (Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement), and Mr. Pugh (Utility). Mr. Tholstrup (Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement), Mr. Iriowen (Utility), Mr. Shevock, and Ms. Smith (Legislative, Finance, and Administration) were absent. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried. PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee met with Chairwoman Arndt presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Proposed Grant Recommendations for Fiscal Year 2024 (Tracey Harvey, CDBG Program Manager) Ms. Tracey Harvey, CDBG Program Manager reviewed the background and analysis regarding the grant recommendations for Fiscal Year 2024. Staff recommended approval of the recommended funding amounts. Responding to Mr. Neil, Ms. Harvey stated that Mr. Neil is correct in that what they are approving is based on the contingency upon what is received from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Harvey stated that the grant is a multi-year grant. She explained that there are only four grantees, and they are the four grantees that she has had for the last five years. She stated that 2024 is the last year of the multi-year grant and the new round of grant applications will begin in January of 2025. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Harvey stated that the multi-year grant is awarded every five years and those that receive the grant within that time frame keep the grant for the entire five years. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Harvey stated that one is in-house, one is for the program administration, and the other four are the grantees. Page 57

Item #8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MARCH 12, 2024 PAGE 2 Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Harvey stated that a committee composed of three members of council, herself, and a civilian make the recommendation. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Harvey stated that scoring criteria is used in determining the recommendation. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Harvey stated that the proposal is based on what was received last year and should be within twenty percent. However, she did place a provision to make any necessary changes before the May 15th deadline. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Ms. Harvey stated that the Home Ownership Assistance Program is done in-house by Ms. Harvey. Ms. Harvey explained that she receives referrals from lenders and housing counselors. She then assesses their eligibility and determines if they meet the criteria. If they do, they receive the grant. Mr. Neil moved to recommend accepting the staff recommendation for the grant. The motion was seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried with Mr. Lewis abstaining. Mayor and Council Reports – February 2024 Council President Hare Council President Hare had no report to give. First District Mr. Rocha reported that he, Dr. Pillsbury, Mr. Boggerty, and Mayor Christiansen held a Town Hall meeting at Fire Station 2. Mr. Rocha stated that they had over 40 constituents in attendance and some of the concerns were traffic patterns from Kenton Road that are disrupted by road construction, the potential for traffic increases on Carnoustie Road in Fox Hall, Capital School District buses speeding, and road closure issues from DelDOT because of the Kenton Road Project. Mr. Rocha stated that the biggest issue was a rumor that was going around regarding 10 Merion Road, which is a dedicated bus stop for elementary students. It is rumored that the person looking to purchase the home has plans to turn it into an Oxford house which is a halfway house potentially. There are concerns for the elderly community that lives in the vicinity, as well as concerns regarding sex offenders. Mr. Rocha also reported that he received a concern regarding a possible sinkhole in front of 216 N. Caroline Place and asked Mr. Hugg to follow up with him on the issue. Dr. Pillsbury reported that she reached out to the realtor for 10 Merion Road and the only information she was able to reveal was that it was under contract. She also stated that the people she has spoken to have stated that a halfway house generally needs public transportation to be available and there is no public transportation available to Fox Hall. Second District Mr. Lewis reported that he has been addressing issues with the homeless, putting up tents on private property from South State Street down to Lotus Street. Mr. Lewis stated that he addressed a tent that was set up by Trader Funeral Home in the back parking lot. Mr. Lewis explained that everyone received an email on Friday that the electronic speed signs are in the process of being Page 58

Item #8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MARCH 12, 2024 PAGE 3 ordered by the city. The grant that Mr. Lyon applied for was approved and some legislators have allocated some CTF funds. Mr. Lewis stated that he started working with Ms. Duca on addressing the issue of an unpaved road by Elm Street to see if it could be paved and addressed through CTF funds. Lastly, Mr. Lewis reported that he is in the process of coordinating a community meeting for the end of April. Third District Mr. Neil reported that he attended the Downtown Dover Partnership meetings along with the Kent County Tourism meetings. Mr. Neil thanked Habitat for Humanity for the Hero Award that included a hard hat. Mr. Neil stated that he attended the Beth Sholom service and dedication ceremony for the Brenman Jewish History Library and Study Center where Mayor Christiansen presented a proclamation to the congregation and Mr. Neil presented a certificate to Past President Caroline Schwartz. Mr. Neil reported that he participated in Duke University’s DEAL lab survey on police alternatives, had several email exchanges with constituents regarding the five-way traffic solution on Governors Avenue, which is coming together, and worked with Ms. Arndt and Chief Johnson on addressing a drug hot spot around Serenity Place. Mr. Neil reported that he attended a webinar on affordable housing hosted by the State of Maryland Planning Department on February 22nd, the Riverwalk discussion held at the Library on February 24th, and the Council Workshop on March 1st. Lastly, Mr. Neil reported that he sent several alerts to Civic and HOA leaders in the Third District to keep them informed. Ms. Arndt reported that in addition to what Mr. Neil reported she and other council members attended the Police Academy Graduation, the Innovative Readiness Training Application meeting spearheaded by Councilman Anderson, and the Unsheltered Working Group meetings with Councilman Rocha. Fourth District Mr. Anderson was absent; he submitted his report electronically (Attachment #1). Mr. Sudler was absent, and no report was given. At-Large Mr. Boggerty was absent, and no report was given. Mayor Christiansen Mayor Christiansen stated that he respectfully will no longer be submitting his monthly reports until he has an Administrative Assistant. Mayor Christiansen stated that there is only one Administrative Assistant between the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and himself and she is overworked as it is. Ms. Arndt moved for adjournment of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m. UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee met with Chairman Rocha presiding. Page 59

Item #8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MARCH 12, 2024 PAGE 4 Adoption of Agenda Dr. Pillsbury moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Ms. Arndt and unanimously carried. Department of Energy Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnership (GRIP) Presentation (Scott Lynch, DEMEC) Mr. Scott Lynch, VP of Asset Development of DEMEC reviewed the presentation titled AMI & GRIP Grant Funding Opportunities. Staff recommended adopting Resolution No. 2024-05 as submitted so staff may complete a letter of commitment to American Municipal Power (AMP) for its Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnership (GRIP) Incentive Application. Responding to Mr. Neil, Mr. Lynch stated that becoming an associate member of DEMEC does not impact the city’s affiliation with The Energy Authority (TEA). Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Lynch stated that the grant would cover up to 50% of the costs. If the grant were solely for electricity, it would cover 50%. However, if water and electricity were included, the percentage would change. Mr. Lynch explained that the city would be responsible for covering the remaining percentage. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Lynch stated that the additional rounds would continue until the funds were exhausted. If the city was not given the opportunity in this round to receive funds, then there would be a chance in the future to apply again. However, once the funds are exhausted, they would recommend seeking alternative funding sources that could replace the GRIP funding. Otherwise, the city would have to assume full financial obligation. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Waddell stated that he has budgeted for an AMI system in his Fiscal Year 2026 budget. Therefore, the funds would be available around the time of implementing the FY26 budget. Mr. Waddell explained that he is already planning to spend the money to implement the program, so obtaining grant money to offset 50% of the cost would be beneficial. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Waddell stated that currently, the city has an Automated Meter Read (AMR) system which means the meter reading staff from customer service must ride around specific routes in the city every day. With an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), staff will no longer have to drive around town. Instead, they can simply push a button, and all of the meter readings will be transmitted to a server. This will enable them to perform billing immediately and efficiently. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Waddell clarified that no jobs would be eliminated due to the implementation of the AMI system. Instead, meter readers would be transitioned to meter technicians. If there are errors on the meters, these technicians will be dispatched to troubleshoot the meter, swap it out if necessary, bring it back, and perform tests on it. Mr. Waddell also mentioned that they will need to purchase about two more test benches, as they currently only have one. Page 60

Item #8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MARCH 12, 2024 PAGE 5 Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Waddell stated that another plus to the AMI system is the remote disconnect and reconnect process. He explained that with the AMR system if someone is delinquent on their bill and the electricity has been disconnected and they come in to pay the bill it may not be until the next day for service to be restored. Mr. Waddell explained with the AMI system if someone walks into the office at 4:45 p.m. their service can be restored with a click of a button. Mr. Waddell further explained that the AMI system opens the city up to different rate structures and different demand response programs. It also gives more opportunity to the customer to take control of their electricity usage to help lower their bills. Mr. Lynch stated that they have found that customers who have direct access to their usage information can save upwards of 8% on their electricity bill. This is achieved simply by being able to review their electric usage on a daily or hourly basis, allowing them to make informed choices rather than waiting until the end of the month to receive the bill in the mail. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Waddell stated that all of the meters would have to be replaced. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Lynch stated that if the city chose to implement an electric change, the estimated cost presented is approximately $4.8 million. However, with a GRIP grant covering 50% of the cost, the expense would be reduced to $2.4 million. Mr. Waddell stated that the AMI system provides a customer-facing portal, which the AMR system does not provide. He explained that the portal allows customers to review their usage trends and plan better. Additionally, Mr. Waddell stated that the AMI system sends signals to the system operations center, identifying system failures sometimes before the customer notices. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Waddell stated that the parameters of the contract would determine who could replace the meters within the city. He explained that there are vendors that offer turnkey installation, where they bring in a large workforce to complete the changeover. Alternatively, there are options where the manufacturer ships the meters preprogrammed, or they assist the meter technicians with programming the meters before swapping them out. Mr. Waddell noted that while turnkey installation gets the job done faster, it comes with a higher labor cost. He emphasized that the various packages and options would need to be carefully considered. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Waddell stated that implementing the AMI system would be cost- effective due to savings on equipment rolls. He explained that under the current system, if staff goes out at night to do reconnects, they are paid two hours of on-call overtime per the contract, even if they only reconnect one or two meters. With the AMI system, staff could simply hit a button to reconnect the power, saving two hours of overtime, as well as the cost of fuel and wear and tear on the vehicles. Mr. Waddell also noted that the same would apply to the trouble truck. Additionally, he emphasized that the AMI system would eliminate potential harm to staff when customers are unwelcoming, as connections and disconnections could be made remotely on a computer, potentially limiting negative interactions. Responding to Dr. Pillsbury, Mr. Waddell stated that the AMI system would allow staff to go into the meter and set a new rate from a specific day or hour forward. Page 61

Item #8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MARCH 12, 2024 PAGE 6 Responding to Dr. Pillsbury, Mr. Waddell stated that the current AMR system reads from the 22nd of the month to the 22nd of the following month. Therefore, if there is a rate change on the first of the month, there is no way to go back and break down how many kilowatts were used at the old rate and how many at the new rate. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Lynch stated that the AMI system does not include an online payment system; payments would have to be processed through the current billing system. Mr. Lynch stated that Lewes and Clayton are the only other DEMEC members who do not have an AMI system. He explained that Clayton committed last year but they did not get funded, and Lewes committed last year, and they are going to move forward again. Newark has an AMI system, and they are looking to transition to the DEMEC AMP system. Responding to Dr. Pillsbury, Mr. Lynch stated that the city had not been funded previously, but their partners spoke with the Department of Energy to determine what was missing from the application. They then incorporated what they learned into the newest application. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lynch stated that the meters are expected to last 10 years and are under warranty for three. He explained that the contract stipulates that if a meter fails under warranty, it can be sent back and replaced for the cost of time without the meter. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lynch stated that 10 years is the standard amount of time. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lynch stated that there are routine tests done on the system to make sure that it is functioning as well as being upgraded to the latest software, but it is all included. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Lynch stated that the city would receive a notice that the meter needs to be replaced. A truck would then replace the meter with one from stock, as there are spares included. The faulty meter would be sent out, and once corrected, or if a new one is needed, it would be shipped back to the city as part of the contract. Responding to Mr. Pugh, Mr. Lynch stated that American Municipal Power is who provided the RFP. Mr. Neil moved to recommend accepting staff recommendation to approve Resolution No. 2024-05. The motion was seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried. Mr. Rocha moved for adjournment of the Utility Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 6:46 p.m. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Council President Hare presiding in the absence of a chair. Page 62

Item #8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MARCH 12, 2024 PAGE 7 Adoption of Agenda Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried. Evaluation of Proposals – Ambulance Services Contract (Kay Sass, Public Affairs and Emergency Management Coordinator) Ms. Kay Sass, Public Affairs and Emergency Management Coordinator reviewed the proposals for the ambulance services contract. Staff recommended authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract to provide emergency ambulance services to the City of Dover for a three-year period with the option of a one, two-year extension with the negotiated ending date of June 30, 2027. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Sass confirmed that Ambulnz was bought out by DocGo. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Sass stated that the references contacted in municipalities and townships that were seeking the same level and type of service that the city is looking for have been in a contract with them for a couple of years. One of them was looking to renew a contract for another five years. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Sass stated that the reference was sent out under Ambulnz and when they submitted it back to the city, they used Ambulnz. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Ms. Sass stated that they are not privy to the contractor’s collection rates because that is something billed separately. The city’s contract focuses on what the city pays out to them. Ms. Sass reminded council that one of the concerns before was the turnaround time for some billings with previous contractors. She explained that this is something the city has no control over, but it does affect what the city ends up paying in the long run. She further explained that it was clarified that some municipalities end up getting all their money back with the hybrid model; however, she is unsure what Dover's experience will be. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Ms. Sass stated that she could send requests out to all four vendors for verification on their financials if there is additional information that council is requesting. Mr. Rocha moved to recommend tabling the item until they could gather more information and take a second look at the recommendation. The motion was seconded by Dr. Pillsbury. Mayor Christiansen emphasized that Ms. Sass went to great lengths to gather the information that was requested, and he wanted to reiterate that council’s decision is not a reflection of her efforts. Mr. Lewis commended Ms. Sass on her diligent research. Mr. Rocha also stated that Ms. Sass did an excellent job, and their decision is no reflection on her. Dr. Pillsbury stated that Ms. Sass has done a great job, but they have concerns that they need to address. Page 63

Item #8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MARCH 12, 2024 PAGE 8 Responding to Dr. Pillsbury, Ms. Sass stated that the EMTs are required to have emergency experience. Mr. Hare suggested amending the motion to include that a special meeting can be called at a date and time to be determined to have further discussion. Mr. Rocha moved to recommend tabling the item until they could gather more information and take a second look at the recommendation at a special meeting to be called at a date and time to be determined for further discussion. The motion was seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried with Mr. Lewis abstaining. Ms. Sass asked if council members have any questions, please get them to her within the week to allow ample time to obtain the information. Mr. Hare moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 7:04 p.m. Mr. Hare moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 7:04 p.m. William F. Hare Council President Attachments Attachment #1 - Mr. Anderson’s 4th District Report Page 64

ATTACHMENT #1 Council Committee of the Whole Meeting of 03/12/2024 Item #8. 4th District Report Met with at Silver Lake Blvd to a neighborhood meeting called by constituents with Councilman Sudler and me. Started IRT process with the collaboration of Councilwoman Arndt and Councilwoman Dr. Pillsbury Taken numerous phone calls and personal constituent contacts. Making 8 grant connections for city referring information to staff or NGO. Spoke with 2 Star about DAFB Joint Use Agreement. Following up with Congressional delegation Participated in Capitol School district community meeting on discipline and safety with the Mayor and Councilman Boggerty. Met with DDP leaders. Attended Hope Commission open house and kickoff for Dover. Conversed with Senator Brown. Page 65

FIRST READING Item #15. City of Dover CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-02 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN 2 COUNCIL MET: 3 That Chapter 106 – Traffic and Vehicles, Article III – Stopping, Standing and Parking, Section 106- 4 136. On-street accessible disabled parking be amended by inserting the text indicated in bold, blue, 5 italics, and deleting the text indicated in red strikeout as follows: 6 Sec. 106-136. - On-street accessible disabled parking 7 On-street accessible disabled parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with the following 8 regulations: 9 (1) ANSI. Requirements of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for Passenger 10 Loading Zones are to be met. 11 12 (2) Signs, markings. The city will provide necessary signs and markings, including 13 installation at the city's cost. 14 (3) Curb ramp. If a new curb ramp is required to provide access from the road to the 15 sidewalk, the party making the request shall provide labor and materials to complete the 16 work. All costs of the ramp installation will be the responsibility of the party making the 17 request. All work shall be done in accordance with city standards. 18 (4) Private property. All work on private property will be the responsibility of the property 19 owner. 20 (5) State roads. On state-maintained roads, approval for any required curb depression must 21 be obtained from the department of transportation. 22 (6) On-site spaces. On-street accessible disabled parking spaces shall not be provided in 23 lieu of any required on-site accessible disabled spaces. 24 (7) No parking space on public property shall be set aside, identified, or otherwise reserved 25 for use by a handicapped or disabled person with disabilities who is a City resident and 26 who has available for his/her use a driveway, parking pad, or other type of off-street 27 parking space or private garage, on the premises of his/her residence or within 200 feet 28 of his/her residence that provides at least the same proximity for such resident to his/her 29 residence as the proposed parking space on public property would provide. Proof of two 30 current department of motor vehicles disabled parking permits is required. Failure of an 31 applicant to disclose the foregoing information to the Public Works Department ADA 32 Coordinator shall constitute grounds for disapproval or nonrenewal of reserved parking 33 spaces on public property. This provision also applies to all renewal applications. 34 Disabled parking spaces on public streets and parking lots are for public use for Page 66 35 valid placarded vehicles, not for personal or private use.

Proposed Ordinance #2024-02 Amending Chapter 106 – Traffic and Vehicles, Article III – Stopping, Standing andItem Parking, #15. Section 106-136 Page 2 36 (Code 1981, § 13-41; Ord. of 9-23-1991) 37 ADOPTED: * 38 SYNOPSIS 39 This proposed amendment would prohibit allowing a parking space on public property to be set aside, 40 identified, or otherwise reserved for use by a handicapped or disabled City resident who has available for 41 his/her use a driveway, parking pad, or other type of off-street parking space or private garage, on the 42 premises of his/her residence or within 200 feet of his/her residence that provides at least the same proximity 43 for such resident to his/her residence as the proposed parking space on public property would provide. 44 (SPONSORS: NEIL AND ARNDT) 45 Actions History (Most recent first) 46 03/25/2024 - Scheduled for First Reading - City Council 47 02/27/2024 - Return with staff amendments - Council Committee of the Whole/Legislative, Finance and Administration 48 01/23/2024 - Introduction - Council Committee of the Whole/Legislative, Finance and Administration Page 67

Item #16. PETITION TO AMEND ZONING DISTRICT First Reading before the Dover City Council March 25, 2024 Application: Rezoning Lands of Linda Duncan at 600 Forest Street Owner: Linda Duncan Equitable Owner: Erin Barrett Address: 600 Forest Street, Dover DE Location: South side of Forest Street at the east end of Loockerman. East of Railroad Avenue and railroad corridor. Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.12-02-44.00-000 (and ED-05-076.12-02-45.00-000*) (*Note: The Survey Plan submitted does not match the City’s GIS Mapping of the parcels. Both parcel numbers are related to the area of request; this is being researched for clarification.) Size: 0.51 acres+/- Present Uses: Vacant tract of land 2019 Comprehensive Plan Designation – Land Use Category: Mixed Use Present Zoning: IO (Institutional and Office Zone) H (Historic District Zone) SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) Proposed Zoning: C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) H (Historic District Zone) SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) Reason for Request: Rezoning to build a mixed-use building to include office/retail and apartments. File Number: Z-24-03 Ordinance Number: 2024-09 This is presented for referral of the Rezoning Application to the Planning Commission as per Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 §5. Page 68

City of Dover Application No.: Z-24-03 Item #16. Department of Planning & Inspections RG- RG- e rs Av C- 1 St RG- RG- IO 1 n verno 2A Fulto RG- RG- 1 1 w St N Go IPM RG- NQ 1 1 N Ne C-3 N Kir 1 RG- ueen RG- k wo 1 ge RG- St Rid 1 IO t C-1A est S M 1 od S t ly St NW C- C-1A C-1A C-3 2A RG- r ton D t C-1A 1 C-3 C-3 ion S Wes M Divis ve IO W RG-1 ors A vern C-2A S Go RG-1 IO C-2A RG-1 t eed S C-2A C-3 RG-1 WR C-1A S Ki rkwo C- S est t C-2 C- C-3 od S 1 1A Fore IO SW RG-1 RG-1 RG-1 st St RG-1 t w St C-2A S Ne Lincoln St C-2 R-8 C-2 t R- C-3 C-3 Rail cker man S W Loo een Davis Cir Cher ry St 8 RG-1 S Qu R-8 road C-2 C-2 Ave C-2 Paul St Vine St St IO C- RG-1 IO Jerus 2 IO RG-1 RG-1 Way RG-1 alem IO r St Clare RG- ghte IO Slau 1 t RG-1 nce S h St W Nort C-3 Minim RG-1 a St k Ln Ban RG-4 ing S TND Bann ou IO ett H se Cir Garr t St a ter WW Title: Lands of Linda Duncan Address: 600 Forest St. Parcel ID: ED-05-076.12-02-44.00-000 and ED-05-076.12-02-45.00-000 Existing Zoning: IO (Institutional and Office Zone) Legend SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) Dover Boundary H (Historic District Zone) Proposed Zoning: C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) Subject Property SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) H (Historic District Zone) Zoning Owner: Date: Linda Duncan 3/19/2024 « Dover Parcels Page 69

Item #16. Page 70

Item #16. FIRST READING City of Dover CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-09 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY 2 OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3 600 FOREST STREET 4 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within the 5 limits of the City of Dover; and 6 WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of zoning and planning to change the permitted use of property 7 described below from IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and subject to the H (Historic District Zone) and the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) and subject to the H (Historic District Zone) and the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone). 8 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 9 DOVER, IN COUNCIL, MET: 10 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map and Zoning 11 Ordinance of the City of Dover have been amended by changing the zoning designation from IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and subject to H (Historic District Zone) and the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) and subject to the H (Historic District Zone) and the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) on that property located at 600 Forest Street (South side of Forest Street and near the west end of Loockerman Street) consisting of 0.51 acres +/- owned by Linda Duncan. 12 13 (Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.12-02-44.00-000 and ED-05-076.12-02-45.00-000; Planning Reference: Z-24-03; Fourth Council District) 14 ADOPTED: * 15 Actions History 16 03/25/2024 - Scheduled for First Reading - City Council Page 71

Item #17. PETITION TO AMEND ZONING DISTRICT First Reading before the Dover City Council March 25, 2024 Application: Lands of White Marsh Environmental Systems, Inc. at 1100 and 1110 South Little Creek Road Owner: White Marsh Environmental Systems, Inc. c/o Tidewater Utilities Addresses: 1100 and 1110 South Little Creek Road, Dover DE Location: South side of South Little Creek Road and west of State Route 1 Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.12-01-03.00-000 Size: 10.7146 acres +/- Present Uses: Offices 2019 Comprehensive Plan Designation – Land Use Category: Office Present Zoning: CPO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) Proposed Zoning: IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone) Reason for Request: For rezoning of the property for future expansion for material storage (in addition to current Office use). File Number: Z-24-04 Ordinance Number: 2024-10 This is presented for referral of the Rezoning Application to the Planning Commission as per Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 §5. Page 72

City of Dover Application No.: Z-24-04 Item #17. Department of Planning & Inspections Coo RM-1 per C R-8 ir n Ro u dt re e Dr Regent St MH Moriarty S t R-8 Holmes St Ingram St narch D Mo r Signal St RG-3 R-8 Barrister Pl ROS R-8 S Little Creek Rd C-1 C-1A APZ II C-3 R-8 C-3 rl Ct Ba Ot CPO is Dr R-8 C-3 Ct t er dC wl 1 lan Fo M n Connector State H Cr Is Punc heon Ru g wy d Lo n for rta aw R-8 be Ct Ro Hasle Ave berton Av e tSt K im RG-2 IPM re w R-8 Sh K ear s ury t sb ney e Ct AS M Ct Ct Pl um ag Title: Lands of White Marsh Environmental Systems, Inc. Address: 1100 and 1110 South Little Creek Road Parcel ID: ED-05-077.12-01-03.00-000 Existing Zoning: CPO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) Legend Proposed Zoning: IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone) Dover Boundary Owner: White Marsh Environmental Systems, Inc. Date: 3/19/2024 Subject Property Zoning « Dover Parcels Page 73

24x36 24x36 Item #17. 24x36 24x36 NAD 24x36 83 / DS 24x36 P N 24x36 24x36 24x36 ARCH I T E C TURE 24x36 ENG I NE E R I NG Delaware 24x36 24x36 309 South Governors Avenue 21 Dover, DE 19904 302.734.7950 21 24x36 The Tower at STAR Campus 24x36 100 Discovery Boulevard, Suite 102 Newark, DE 19713 24x36 302.369.3700 24x36 KO Maryland RE AN 312 West Main Street, Suite 300 LANDS N/F WA DEL Salisbury, MD 21801 R AW 24x36 24x36 410.546.9100 VA E VE ARE CARBAUGH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC T.P.: 2-05-07712-01-0400-00001 RY North Carolina 30' DEED REF.: D 519/193 T ING ER RO WI ANS UTE 30' ZONING - CPO 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 24x36 DT 24x36 H R ME 1 (S Wilmington, NC 28403 IGH ME R1 22 X 910.341.7600 22 X T-O OR ) ADA BENCH MARK 1 F-W IAL www.beckermorgan.com LI X FIRC 21 H 24x36 A 24x36 S 17° 28' 44" E IRON ROD W/ CAP 999.00' RY TTLE -G X Y IG 22 21 ELEV.: 20.15' X H WA N: 420918.0482 20 20 X Y ING 21 E: 633849.9357 C 367 24x36 X 24x36 WID REE 20 .83F.H. 19 19 X ' W.M 19 19 X K . TH W.V . 19 18 18 20 17 X RIG ROA 24x36 18 17 16 24x36 19 X 18 17 16 RADIUS: 21539.86' F.H. 17 X HT- ARC LENGTH: 529.79' D( 18 18 19 19 X CHD. BRG: N 10° 55' 32" E OF FIRE LANE -WA K-67 19 19 19 20 24x36 22 20 21 X CHD. LENGTH: 529.77' 24x36 22 21 22 22 22 X 23 ) B 21 6 20 X Y 23 F.F ,776 S UILD 23 22 X SO 24x36 21 24x36 2.8 X VA ING 5' UT . E L.: .F. 22 15 X 1617 30' H NG 21 21 21 20 17 15 X 2 16 FIRE X EXISTING BUILDING EXI 24x36 24x36 18 70' 40' 20 21 STI X 20 16 22 F.F. EL.: 21.80' EXI 19 X 9,882 S.F. . G.M ST . 19 X SH ING 24x36 S.F 10.7146 ACRES ± 24x36 450 ED 22 LANE 20 X X 22 F.H. 21 15 X 24x36 . W.V 15 24x36 22 X 19 16 W.V. X 21 14 X F.H. 24x36 22 21 X 24x36 18 17 "E 21 G.M. 1' 1 20 19 G.TE 5 20 14 S 78° 189'154.4 ST 15 S8 24x36 24x36 T.P.: 2-05-077 20 6° 2 LANE FIRE 18 13 74 "' W 20 16-02-0301-0 13 RT. 10. L.L.C 0001 21 20 LANDS N/F DEED REF.: 24x36 20 19 19 17 24x36 20 16 15 14 14 21 . 20 19 D 11586/150 21 21 X X X X X FIR 1588.33' X FCM 18 17 N 17° 29' 01" W FCM 17 24x36 22 19 19 24x36 ZONING - M LANDS N/F PROJECT TITLE RT. 10. L.L.C. LANDS N/F T.P.: 2-05-07712-01-0200-00001 RT. 10. L.L.C. LANDS N/F 24x36 RT. 10. L.L.C. T.P.: 2-05-07712-01-0200-00001 DEED REF.: D 11586/150 ZONING - C3 T.P.: 2-05-07712-01-0200-00001 DEED REF.: D 11586/150 LANDS OF 24x36 WHITEMARSH ZONING - C3 DEED REF.: D 11586/150 ZONING - C3 ENVIRONMENTA 24x36 24x36 24x36 SYSTEMS INC. 24x36 24x36 . 24x36 24x36 24x36 1100 S. LITTLE CREEK ROAD SITE DATA CITY OF DOVER KENT OCUNTY, DELAWARE 24x36 24x36 1. OWNER OF RECORD: WHITE MARSH ENVIRONMETNAL SYSTEMS INC. c/o TIDEWATER UTILITIES,INC 1100 S. LITTLE CREEK ROAD SHEET TITLE 24x36 DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 24x36 2. ENGINEER / SURVEYOR: BECKER MORGAN GROUP INC. 309 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVE. BOUNDARY AND 24x36 DOVER, DELAWARE 19904 302-734-7950 TOPOGRAPHIC 24x36 3. PROPERTY LOCATION: 1100 S. LITTLE CREEK ROAD, DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 LATITUDE N 39° 09' 20.60" - NAD83 (2007) SURVEY SURVEY LEGEND 24x36 ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED C-1-NOTES-LEGEND-SURVEY 4. TAX PARCEL NUMBER: LONGITUDE W 75° 29' 43.31" - NAD83 (2007) 2-05-07712-01-0300-00001 . 24x36 UNMARKED POINT 5. DEED REFERENCE : D.R. 347/272 24x36 24x36 CONCRETE MONUMENT FCM SCM 6. SITE AREA SUMMARY: 10.7146 ACRES ± IRON PIPE FIP SIP 7. ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS: C-PO - COMMERCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IRON PIPE W/ CAP FIPC 8. SETBACKS: C-PO - COMMERCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE 24x36 24x36 IRON ROD FIR SIR FRONT YARD: 10 FT SIDE YARD: 5 FT 0 30 60 120 IRON ROD W/ CAP FIRC SIRC REAR YARD: 15 FT DRILL HOLE FDH SDH 24x36 9. BULK REQUIREMENTS: C-PO - COMMERCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE 24x36 STONE FSTONE MINIMUM LOT AREA: 5,000 S.F. Do Not Explode - Select Scale PK NAIL FPK SPK MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: COVERAGE: 50 FT 75% MAX IMPERVIOUS SCALE: 1" = 60' 24x36 MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 50 FT 24x36 BUILDING HEIGHT: 45 FT (3-STORIES) ISSUE BLOCK LEGEND FLOOR AREA RATIO: 2.0 ITEM EXISTING ITEM EXISTING 10. PRESENT USE: OFFICES 24x36 24x36 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SANITARY GRAVITY SEWER LINE, EX. 10"S SIZE & FLOW DIRECTION 11. ROAD CLASSIFICATION: S. LITTLE CREEK ROAD - MAJOR COLLECTOR CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SLAB / PAVING SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN, SIZE 12. DelDOT TID: PARCEL IS NOT IN A DELDOT TID AREA EX. 10" F.M. IMPERVIOUS SURFACED ROAD, DRIVE & FLOW DIRECTION 24x36 OR PARKING LOT 13. INVESTMENT LEVEL: PARCEL IS WITHIN LEVEL 1 INVESTMENT AREA 24x36 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (S.M.H.) INDIVIDUAL TREE OR BUSH 14. SURVEY DATUM: NGS MONUMENTS EVERGREEN DECIDUOUS SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT VERTICAL: NAVD 88 - L37 WIRE FENCE X X X NAD 83 (2007) DSP - DNREC EX. 10" W HORIZONTAL: 24x36 CHAINLINK FENCE WATER MAIN & SIZE 24x36 STOCKADE FENCE 15. SURVEY UNIT: LINEAR: US SURVEY FOOT FIRE HYDRANT F.H. ANGULAR: DEGREES MINUTES SECONDS (DMS) COORDINATE: GROUND . WATER VALVE (W.V.) OR METER (W.M.) . . . STRUCTURE (CONCRETE, WOOD, 24x36 METAL, ETC.) W.M. W.V. 24x36 16. MONUMENTATION: 6 FOUND MARK DATE DESCRIPTION STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (S.D.M.H.) DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE GENERAL NOTES 17. SURVEY CLASSIFICATION: SUBURBAN SURVEY LAYER STATE: SURVEY EMBANKMENT SIDESLOPES (DOWN) STORM DRAIN LINE (CMP OR RCP) 1. THE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS COMPILED FROM A FIELD RUN SURVEY PROJECT NO.: 2023208.00 24x36 24x36 CONTOUR 49 CATCH BASIN PERFORMED BY BECKER MORGAN GROUP, INC., DOVER, DE. IN FEBRUARY 2024. DATE: 3-1-24 43.55 2. THE BOUNDARY LINES PORTRAYED HEREON HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BASED SOLELY ON PHYSICAL ELEVATION SPOT SHOT UTILITY POLE W/ OVERHEAD SERVICE (TELEPHONE OR ELECTRIC OR BOTH) EVIDENCE DISCOVERED IN THE FIELD IN CONJUNCTION WITH DETERMINATIONS DERIVED FROM SOURCE OF SCALE: 1" = 60' BENCH MARK TITLE AND ADJACENT DEED RECORD INFORMATION. DRAWN BY: M.J.H. PROJ. MGR.: M.J.H. 24x36 24x36 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC U.E. 3. PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, ETC. AS PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE U.T. MAY BE SHOWN OR NOTED IN ANY RECORD, PUBLIC OR OTHERWISE, OR ANY REQUIREMENT OR SHEET CENTERLINE REGULATION OF ANY PUBLIC AGENCY. 1 24x36 UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN EX. 2" G 24x36 LIGHT POLE 4. PARCEL IS LOCATED WITHIN ZONE "X", AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD, BASED ON FIRM MAP 10006C0186J PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED N/A & MAP 10006C0188J, EFFECTIVE DATE JULY 7, 2014. COPYRIGHT 2024 Page 74 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2023\2023208\DWG\2023208-SVY-C3D21.dwg, Mar 01, 2024 - 11:21am .PDF 24x36 24x36 2024-03-01

Item #17. FIRST READING City of Dover CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-10 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY 2 OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3 1100 AND 1110 S. LITTLE CREEK ROAD 4 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within the 5 limits of the City of Dover; and 6 WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of zoning and planning to change the permitted use of property 7 described below from CPO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) to IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone). 8 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 9 DOVER, IN COUNCIL, MET: 10 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map and Zoning 11 Ordinance of the City of Dover have been amended by changing the zoning designation from CPO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) to IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone) on that property located at 1100 and 1110 S. Little Creek Road (South side of South Little Creek Road and west of State Route 1) consisting of 10.7146 acres +/- owned by White Marsh Environmental Systems. 12 13 (Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.12-01-03.00-000; Planning Reference: Z-24-04; Second Council District) 14 ADOPTED: * 15 Actions History 16 03/25/2024 - Scheduled for First Reading - City Council Page 75