Yo rale tèks sa a nan PDF la otomatikman, epi li ka gen erè. PDF la se dosye ofisyèl la, kidonk tcheke l anvan ou konte sou sa a.
3 paj pa gen anpil tèks ou ka li isit la, oswa yo pa gen ditou, souvan paske se eskanè oswa desen. Gade PDF la pou sa yo.
Paj 1
PARKS, RECREATION, AND
COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE
The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Meeting was held on
November 12, 2013, at 3:32 p.m. with Chairman Dixon presiding. Members present were
Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Perza, Mr. Caldwell, and Mrs. Horsey.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the agenda as presented, seconded by Mr. Perza and
unanimously carried.
Benchmarks Established for the Economic Development Office
Mr. Bill Neaton, Economic Development Director, reviewed the benchmarks and results for the
Economic Development Office, including information regarding the Downtown Dover Partnership
(DDP), Downtown Dover Business Growth, and City-Wide Economic Development.
In reviewing the strategic objectives for Fiscal Year 2013-2014, Mr. Neaton advised members that
the site development master plan for Garrison Tract had been completed. He stated that the Garrison
Tract currently consisted of 15 parcels, with two (2) parcels either under construction or completed
(SunPark and Calpine Energy), and a third parcel recently sold to Uzin Utz for a manufacturing
facility. He stated that as a result of a recent meeting with Secretary Alan Levin, Delaware
Economic Development Office, a secured commitment was made to market the Garrison Tract. He
assured members that staff continued to assist Calpine and Kvaerner, the contractor, during the
construction phase, noting that conference calls were being held every Monday morning to discuss
any outstanding issues that needed to be resolved.
Regarding the infrastructure improvements at the Garrison Tract, Mr. Neaton indicated that the
selection process for the water tower had been completed and that negotiations continued with
Chesapeake Utilities to provide a four (4) inch gas line service to the remaining 13 parcels. He
advised members that a proposal from Chesapeake Utilities was received last week, after several
weeks of negotiations, and would be forwarded for legal review. Once reviewed, he planned to
present it to City Council for approval. Mr. Neaton stated that staff was working with Becker
Morgan Group to complete the construction documents and, once completed, bids would be solicited
for the infrastructure, which would include the roadway, sewer line, water line, and storm water
system. It was hoped that bids would be solicited by the end of the month with a due date in
December for presentation to City Council in January. This would allow for the contracts to be
awarded in February and construction to begin soon after.
Mr. Neaton stated that, in an effort to promote City-wide economic development initiatives, a
commitment had been made by Uzin Utz to purchase Lot 12 at the Garrison Tract and that
discussions were currently taking place with two (2) other prospects for parcels at the Garrison Tract,
one (1) a very large utility user and the other a smaller utility user but major employer.
Mr. Neaton assured members that he continued to work with Mr. Jim Waddington, Kent County
Economic Development Office and Executive Director of the Kent Economic Partnership. With
regard to the Kent County AeroPark, he stated that there was a potential tenant for 150,000 square
feet of the SunRoc building. He reminded members that an update of the Job Growth Report for the
City’s 12 largest employers was being provided to City Council on a regular basis.
Paj 2
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 2013 PAGE 2
Mr. Neaton advised members that a breakfast meeting was held with the City’s top employers in
May 2013 and that an initial meeting of the Plant Managers Association was held in September 2013
with subsequent meetings to be held quarterly. Regarding the objective to partner with the Kent
Economic Partnership to develop a strategy for a Food Innovation District in Dover, he stated that
this project was continuing to move forward and that the Executive Director from a Food Innovation
District in upstate New York would participate in the next meeting via conference call to explain
how they established their Food Innovation District and what their successes and challenges were.
Responding to Mr. Hutchison regarding whether Calpine had adequate acreage to move to Phase II
under their current “footprint”, Mr. Neaton confirmed that Calpine had enough acreage on Lot 7 to
progress to Phase II and had been permitted to proceed to this phase. He noted that Eastern Shore
Natural Gas also had all permits and that all related studies had been completed.
In response to Mr. Hutchison regarding whether the Economic Development Office was informed
on the Kent County Economic Development Board’s activities related to the air cargo project,
Mr. Neaton stated that he met with Secretary Levin to discuss the progress this project. He stated
that all studies had been completed and that once a joint use agreement is finalized, bids would be
solicited and the project would begin to move forward.
Responding to Mrs. Horsey regarding the concept of a Food Innovation District, Mr. Neaton
explained that this would be a partnership with Delaware State University and that attempts were
being made to establish an area where companies that process food or conduct innovative studies on
food use could be located.
Noting that several of the economic benchmarks related to the Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP),
Mr. Neaton requested that Mr. Lou Colón, Executive Director, present the advance initiatives of the
Partnership.
Mr. Colón advised members that he had been serving as the Executive Director for only eight (8)
months and distributed an event calendar for the year, including DDP-sponsored events (indicated
by bold font) and other partnerships with non-profit organizations (Attachment #1). He stated that
the DDP was in the process of redoing marketing media in an effort to attract new businesses to the
downtown area, as well as updating their marketing brochure and website. He noted that these were
ongoing projects.
Mr. Colón indicated that 238 Railroad Street was under demolition and the final inspection was
scheduled for Friday, November 15, 2013. He stated that since the City paid for the demolition,
there would be a lien on the property for the balance of the costs. With reference to 22-24 West
Loockerman Street, he stated that the EZ pass lease had been received, was being reviewed by legal
counsel, and would be routed for required signatures. Mr. Colón indicated that renovations for
EZ Pass were underway, with an expected completion date of February 2014. He advised members
that the DDP continued to share site information developed by the listing agent for the Acme site,
explaining that a partnership was being developed with an architect and a group performing
construction work in Middletown, Delaware.
Paj 3
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 2013 PAGE 3
Referring to vacancies in the downtown area, Mr. Colón stated that several conversations had been
held with individuals interested in the Loockerman Exchange building for a possible restaurant and
that he continued to have discussions with representatives of Starbucks, as well as individuals
interested in bringing a Jazz Club and Yoga Studio to the downtown area.
In response to Mr. Hutchison regarding the EZ Pass Project, Mr. Colón stated that the project was
approximately $50,000 under budget and 60% complete. The initial lease agreement was for three
(3) years with a renewal for an additional three (3) years.
Mr. Colón indicated that the signage in the parking lots would be replaced with blue and white signs
to match other signage and provide uniformity throughout the City.
No further action was taken by the Committee.
UPDATE - CDBG PROGRAM
Members were provided an Update of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program,
including the status of FY-2013 CDBG Projects - October 2013. In addition, members were
provided an update on the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP).
No further action was taken by the Committee.
Future Use of the Dover Park Recreation Center
During their Regular Meeting of October 28, 2013, members of City Council considered the Parks,
Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Report of October 14, 2013. After much
discussion regarding the Committee’s recommendations for the future use of the Dover Park
Recreation Center, City Council postponed the demolition of the Center and referred the item back
to the Committee to consider programming a new building and its possible configuration, whether
it be a splash park, gym, or other proposal, for a recommendation to Council, employing special
meetings and experts in the community, within 60 days.
Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members
that after the last City Council Meeting, she met with Mr. George Krupanski, President and CEO of
the Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware, and a “walk through” of the building was done. In addition,
she stated that a “walk through” was scheduled with Mr. Darrell Tingle from the Greater Dover Boys
and Girls Club. Mr. Krupanski felt that there could be a possibility for partnership; however, he felt
that a needs assessment would be necessary to determine if there was a need for programming to be
offered at the facility and if the building would meet those needs. She explained that all discussions
led back to a needs assessment. She felt that similar discussions could be held with representatives
of the YMCA, who had utilized the facility for their camp this past summer and liked the facility;
however, they were aware that the building was in need of a lot of work. It was her opinion that any
organization, before investing any significant funds into renovating the facility, would require a
needs assessment.
At this time, Mrs. Townshend felt that a City-wide needs assessment for recreation should be
conducted and should include a lot of public involvement. Considering that the building was beyond
its functional life, if a need for indoor recreation at this location was identified, she questioned if the
Paj 4
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 2013 PAGE 4
current building could be utilized. By the time these needs are determined, she noted that the
building would have deteriorated further. She advised members that the building was recently
broken into and that it was currently serving as a nuisance attraction.
Responding to Mr. Hutchison, Mrs. Townshend stated that the YMCA enjoyed using the center as
a temporary facility for their summer camp; however, she indicated that the YMCA recently
completed a major capital project on State Street and had acquired the Kent Swim Club, which was
now considered a major capital project. She stated that the new Executive Director had not visited
the Dover Park site and that she would invite her and other members of the Board to visit the Center
for a “walk through”; however, she advised members that the YMCA was aware of this issue and
had not approached staff with any interest.
Understanding staff’s position and recommendations regarding the Center, Mr. Caldwell explained
his concerns regarding the public’s objections to demolishing the building due to their concerns
regarding a specific area of the community. He indicated assurance that the children were of great
concern for members but that consideration must be given to the entire City and not just a particular
area of the community. He felt that the Center could not be used as a recreation center and, although
the numbers dictated that the building should be demolished, if the City should choose to keep the
building in operation, he suggested that it be utilized as a learning center or small library. It was his
feeling that children were not in need of additional recreation programs but rather more learning
activities, such as learning to read, write, and do math, and that volunteers could be used so that there
would not be any costs to the City. Although he understood the objections to demolishing the
building, he also understood the safety issues and suggested the use of cameras to monitor the
activities around the building.
Since this matter had been discussed at length and considering all issues and public testimony,
Mr. Perza relayed his support for staff’s recommendation for the demolition of the building. It was
his opinion that the building represented the “wants” of the community rather than the “needs.” He
explained that the City was in the process of determining how to best spend the resources available
to develop the park systems City-wide. He indicated that investing in the White Oak Park area
would be a good idea, reflecting the needs of the community and helping the youth; however, his
concern was that the expenditures required to renovate the building ($110,000) would not be the best
use of City funds. He supported the $30,000 expense to demolish the building and suggested that
the City earmark the $80,000 that would have otherwise been spent to repair the building, to be
committed to Dover Park and addressing the needs of the community. He noted that there had been
various ideas, such as a splash park, soccer fields, etc.
Concurring with Mr. Perza, Mrs. Horsey relayed support for investing in Dover Park, but not
necessarily the building. She suggested that staff conduct a survey of those that had attended the last
Committee meeting and relayed objections to the demolition of the building to determine if they
would use the building versus just wanting it to be kept. She indicated that demolition of the
building would go against her support for preservation; however, she relayed support for staff’s
original recommendation for the demolition of the building.
Paj 5
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 2013 PAGE 5
Mrs. Townshend reminded members that there were several other ideas for improvements at Dover
Park, such as providing electricity at the pavilions, installing public restrooms, etc. In addition, she
felt that it would be important to develop a strong vegetative management plan that would promote
visibility in order to address safety issues and concerns. She stated that limiting the number of
concealed areas in the park would allow users of the park to feel safer.
Mr. Dixon suggested that the City establish a task force to consist of volunteers from the community
and allow them to develop a recommendation for Dover Park.
Mr. Perza moved to recommend acceptance of staff’s recommendation to demolish the Dover
Park Recreation Center and that the City Manager be authorized to earmark the balance of
the construction/demolition project up to $80,000 for future capital improvements, in the
City’s future budgets, to Dover Park after a needs assessment is accomplished. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Hutchison and unanimously carried.
For clarification, Mr. Perza stated that since the costs for the minimal renovations to the building
were estimated at $110,000 and demolition would cost approximately $30,000, there would be a
balance of $80,000 which would be committed to Dover Park once it is determined how that money
would be best spent. He stated that this expenditure would not have to be done in any specific fiscal
year; however, these funds would be reserved and earmarked to improve Dover Park once the needs
were determined.
Mr. Dixon encouraged staff to include the community in determining the needs.
Mr. Hutchison moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Perza and unanimously carried.
Meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m.
Wallace R. Dixon
Chairman
WRD/MK/jg/dd/tm
S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS\Committee-Minutes\2013\11-12-2013 PR&CE.wpd
Attachment
Attachment #1 - Activity/Event Schedule - DDP
Paj 6
ATTACHMENT #1
PR&CE Committee Meeting of 11/12/2013