Yo rale tèks sa a nan PDF la otomatikman, epi li ka gen erè. PDF la se dosye ofisyèl la, kidonk tcheke l anvan ou konte sou sa a.
Paj 1
PARKS, RECREATION, AND
COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE
The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Meeting was held on
September 9, 2013, at 12:02 p.m. with Chairman Dixon presiding. Members present were Mr. Perza,
Mr. Caldwell, and Mrs. Horsey. Mrs. Williams was absent.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Chairman Dixon suggested that Agenda Item #3, Presentation - Restoration and Remediation of
Mirror Lake - Rick Greene, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC),
be moved to Agenda Item #1.
Mrs. Horsey moved to approve moving Agenda Item #3 to Item #1, seconded by Mr. Perza and
unanimously carried.
Mrs. Horsey moved for approval of the agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Perza and
unanimously carried.
Presentation - Restoration and Remediation of Mirror Lake - Rick Greene, Department of
Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC)
Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reminded members that, last summer, Mr. Rick Greene,
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC), provided a detailed
description of the Restoration and Remediation of Mirror Lake Project. He stated that since
Mr. Greene was not able to attend this meeting, he would provide an update on the project.
Mr. Koenig stated that Mr. Greene had secured all project funding and that the Restoration and
Remediation of Mirror Lake Project could now begin. He advised members that engineering plans
and specifications were complete, and federal permits and the State’s erosion and sediment control
plans had been approved. The State’s Subaqueous Lands Permits were being finalized and awaited
final signature. Mr. Koenig stated that Mr. Greene had secured an access agreement from the City
of Dover for the area off Park Drive and was working on the access agreements from Colonial
Investments for the west side and from the State Office of Management and Budget for the area
downstream from Court Street. He indicated that State and/or other grants would be funding the
entire project.
With regard to public relations, Mr. Koenig indicated that a press release was being developed and
a press event was tentatively planned for November 1, 2013. He stated that a sign was being
developed and that content and placement was being coordinated with the City.
In relation to water quality monitoring, Mr. Koenig stated that baseline monitoring was scheduled
to begin on September 6, 2013 during preconstruction and would include the lake itself, as well as
areas upstream and downstream. He indicated that Mr. Greene had a mandatory erosion and
sediment pre-construction meeting scheduled for October 1, 2013 regarding the lake portion of the
project. The pre-construction site preparation, including stake-out, survey, stabilization of the access
road off Park Drive, and the placement of the turbidity curtain, was scheduled to begin in
mid-October. The Mirror Lake portion of the project would take approximately three (3) weeks and
Paj 2
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 2013 PAGE 2
would include carbon application. Mr. Koenig indicated that all major work on the project would
be completed by Thanksgiving, weather permitting, and demobilization and cleanup should be
complete by early December. He stated that some planting for the project would occur in the Spring
of 2014. After the planting, post-construction monitoring would occur in both 2014 and 2016.
Mr. Koenig reminded members that the Restoration and Remediation of Mirror Lake Project was
related to improving the water quality of Mirror Lake and the downstream area due to the sediment
conditions associated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and other materials that had gotten into
the sediment. He explained that this was a demonstration project that Mr. Greene had been working
on for quite some time and was the first application of its kind in this part of the country.
Responding to Mrs. Horsey, Mr. Koenig stated that, to his knowledge, there had been no changes
since the project was first presented to members. He noted that the project would include a
re-fabrication of the east side of the bank where a small planting island would be located, and that
carbon would be placed across the bottom of the lake. He projected that next year there would be
fewer plants growing up out of the water due to disturbance at the bottom.
In response to Mr. Caldwell regarding whether research had proved this approach to be effective,
Mr. Koenig stated that enough research had been done on this type of project to obtain
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approval. Although similar projects had been completed
in other areas, he stated that none had been of this magnitude.
Mrs. Horsey moved to accept the report provided on the Restoration and Remediation of
Mirror Lake Project, seconded by Mr. Caldwell and unanimously carried.
Review of Active Recreation Area Plan - Walker Woods and Walker Woods II (Village of
Sherwood) (North Side of Walker Road and East of Kenton Road)
Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, provided members
with a revised Active Recreation Area Plan for Walker Woods/Walker Woods II (Village of
Sherwood) (Attachment #1), located on the north side of Walker Road and east of Kenton Road.
She noted that changes from the plan previously submitted were highlighted in yellow.
Mrs. Townshend advised members that the proposed project would re-develop Walker Woods and
Walker Woods II into an apartment complex. This would include consolidation of the parcels that
currently make up the townhouse community. She explained that the proposed project included
77 dwelling units on 9.0722+/- acres, which is a density of approximately 8.5 dwelling units per acre;
therefore, the development qualified for the open space exemption in Article 5 - Supplementary
Regulations, §10.5 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Mrs. Townshend advised members that, based on the proposed 77 dwelling units and 150 square feet
of recreation area required per unit, the site was required to have 11,550 square feet of recreation
area. She noted that the applicant had proposed to meet this requirement through a variety of
amenities throughout the development. On the southwest portion of the site, there would be a
community center building with meeting and activity rooms and a playground area adjacent to the
community center. On the east side of the site, a small tot lot was proposed, as well as an Americans
Paj 3
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 2013 PAGE 3
with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible picnic area with a series of picnic tables and grills. There
was also a proposed five (5)-foot-wide mulch path leading from the picnic area to the end of the
cul-de-sac and an ADA accessible path extending from this to the west side of the site where the
playground would be located. There were three (3) 15’x12’ exercise stations proposed throughout
the development. Mrs. Townshend stated that, in addition to these amenities, the applicant had
proposed a series of benches and relaxation stations scattered through the development. The
relaxation stations included a bench, trash receptacle, recycling receptacle, and smoking receptacle
on a concrete pad. There would be four (4) relaxation stations and nine (9) stand-alone benches
distributed throughout the proposed development. She stated that the plan also showed tree
plantings throughout the development, including areas adjacent to the recreation amenities.
Staff submitted a number of comments and recommendations regarding the Active Recreation Area
to be constructed, which were included in the Revised Active Recreation Area Plan.
Mrs. Townshend introduced Mr. Tom Ayd of Green Street Housing, LLC, who was present
representing the developer, should members have any further questions.
In response to Mr. Perza, Mrs. Townshend stated that the items depicted on the map did not currently
exist. Mr. Ayd indicated that the original building footprint resembled the new footprint. He further
explained that there were currently two (2) townhouses located where the community center was
proposed and confirmed that the townhouses would require demolition.
Mrs. Townshend advised members that staff had not had the opportunity to review the site plan,
which was submitted on September 6, 2013.
Responding to Mr. Perza, Mrs. Townshend confirmed that the City would not be responsible for
maintaining the property. Mr. Ayd clarified that the amenities were intended for the tenants and not
the public; however, he explained that it would be difficult to ensure that neighbors would not use
them.
In response to Mrs. Horsey, Mr. Ayd stated that although the plan reflected a mulch path, it would
likely be a “stone and dust” path, which would be stable and allow for the penetration of water with
less maintenance. He explained that when the Plan was originally submitted, the developers did not
put much thought into the design of the area; however, the developers revisited the Plan prior to the
submission of the site plan and felt that it could be revised to bring more functionality to the area.
Mr. Caldwell questioned if other options were considered in terms of what was being used in the
active recreation area and the cost versus how often amenities would be used, as well as the purpose
of the community center. Responding, Mr. Ayd stated that the developers planned to provide a
package of amenities for the community center including office space, a consultation room, a central
laundry facility, a business center to include computers, etc.
Paj 4
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 2013 PAGE 4
Mrs. Townshend explained that the Active Recreation Area Plan was being presented as a part of
the Redevelopment Plan and that the developers were in the process of purchasing all of the land and
planned to redevelop the units into apartment units. As a result, some of the tenants may continue
to reside there and others may not.
Mr. Caldwell indicated his concern regarding the use of the proposed amenities, such as the nine (9)
benches and four (4) relaxation stations. Responding, Mr. Ayd assured members that consideration
would be given to the placement and practicality of the benches.
Responding to Mr. Caldwell regarding the rezoning request for the property, Mrs. Townshend
advised members that the rezoning application was scheduled to be reviewed by City Council during
their Regular Meeting later in the evening. Since the developer had submitted a site plan to be
reviewed by the Planning Commission in October, she explained that the Committee’s
recommendation regarding the Active Recreation Area Plan would be considered by the Planning
Commission at that time. If the property were not rezoned, she stated that it would be necessary to
determine which variances might be required in order to construct the project as presented. She
reminded members that the role of the Committee was to make a recommendation to the Planning
Commission regarding the Active Recreation Area Plan, rather than the rezoning.
Mr. Perza moved to recommend acceptance of the revised Active Recreation Area Plan for
Walker Woods/Walker Woods II (Village of Sherwood) with the inclusion of staff’s comments
and recommendations. The motion was seconded by Mr. Caldwell and unanimously carried.
Consideration of Contribution Amount - Cash-In-Lieu of Recreation Area Construction for
Nottingham Meadows
During their Regular Meeting of June 24, 2013, City Council approved the Parks, Recreation, and
Community Enhancement Committee’s recommendation to approve the Revised Active Recreation
Area Plan for Nottingham Meadows, as recommended by staff, and accept the petition from 28 lot
owners in the development in favor of the proposal. At that time, members were advised that the
proposed plan for cash-in-lieu payment met the area requirements for the Active Recreation Area.
The plan was required to provide 0.6818+/- acres of Active Recreation Area and was proposing
0.6818+/- acres of Active Recreation Area via cash-in-lieu.
Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, explained that
Article 5, Section 10, of the Zoning Ordinance addresses Open Space, Recreation and Other Public
Facilities, and that Subsection 10.17 provides the process and calculation of the amount for
cash-in-lieu of recreation area construction. In addition, she noted that Subsection 10.7 specifies that
City Council, through the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee, must
approve the cash donation amount prior to final acceptance by the Planning Commission.
Mrs. Townshend advised members that the Zoning Ordinance specified the calculation of the amount
of the cash donation, as follows: “cash donation shall be equivalent to the appraised value of land
required…” and that this value shall be “based on the appraisal prepared for the developer to secure
construction financing.” She indicated that an appraisal performed by Dover Consulting
Paj 5
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 2013 PAGE 5
Services, Inc., dated July 5, 2013, was submitted to the Planning Office and that the appraisal valued
the subdivision at $21,292 per acre. Based on this amount, she stated that the value of the 29,700
square feet of land required for Active Recreation Area was $14,517 and that funds received would
go into the Parkland Reserve Fund.
Staff recommended acceptance of the $14,517 cash-in-lieu of recreation area construction donation,
as the amount complied with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Perza moved to accept the $14,517 cash-in-lieu of recreation area construction donation
for Nottingham Meadows, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by
Mrs. Horsey and unanimously carried.
Mr. Perza moved for adjournment, seconded by Mrs. Horsey and unanimously carried.
Meeting adjourned at 12:30 p.m.
Wallace R. Dixon
Chairman
WRD/MK/jg/js/dd/tm
S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS\Committee-Minutes\2013\09-09-2013 PR&CE.wpd
Attachment
Attachment #1 - Revised Active Recreation Area Plan - Walker Woods/Walker Woods II (Village of Sherwood)
Paj 6
ATTACHMENT #1
PR&CE Committee Meeting of 09/09/2013
City of Dover
REVISED
DATA SHEET FOR RECREATION PLAN REVIEW
PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING OF September 9, 2013
Plan Title: Walker Woods/Walker Woods II (Village of Sherwood)
File Number: MI-13-17
Plan Type: Active Recreation Area Plan
Location: North Side of Walker Road East of Kenton Road
Owner: Walker Woods Properties, LLC
Milford Housing Development Corporation
Site Area: 77 Residential Units on 9.0722 ± acres
Property Use: Proposed Apartments
Number of Dwelling Units: Total - 77 dwelling units proposed
Zoning Classification: Current Zoning – RG-3 (Group Housing Zone) and ROS
(Recreation and Open Space Zone)
Proposed Zoning – RG-2 (General Residence Zone) – City
Council will act on rezoning request on September 9, 2013.
(Application #Z-13-02/ Ordinance #2013-13)
PROJECT SUMMARY
The proposed project is to redevelop Walker Woods and Walker Woods II into an apartment
complex. This will include consolidation of the parcels that currently make up the townhouse
community. The proposed project includes 77 dwelling units on 9.0722 acres, which is a density
of approximately 8.5 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the development qualifies for the open
space exemption in the Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 – Supplementary Regulations, § 10.5:
10.514 Residential developments of ten (10) or fewer acres with a density over six units per
acre. These developments shall be exempt from the area requirements set forth in section 10.16,
but shall be required to provide 150 square feet of active recreation area per dwelling unit or
10,000 square feet of active recreation area, whichever is greater. If the commission determines
that the construction of some or all of the required active recreation area is not practical or
desirable, the commission shall require a cash in lieu donation for the active recreation area
determined as not practical or desirable. Cash-in-lieu amount shall be in accordance with
subsection 10.173 of this article.
P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903
Community Excellence Through Quality Service
Paj 7
Walker Woods/Walker Woods II Redevelopment: Recreation Area Plan
Summary Report of Active Recreation Component
Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee Meeting on September 9, 2013
Page 2 of 3
Proposal for Active Recreation Plan
Based on the proposed 77 dwelling units and 150 square feet of recreation area required per unit,
the site is required to have 11,550 square feet of recreation area. The applicant has proposed to
meet this requirement through a variety of amenities throughout the development. On the
southwest portion of the site, there is a community center building with meeting rooms and
activity rooms. A playground area is adjacent to this community center. A small tot lot is
proposed on the east side of the site. On the east side of the site there is also an ADA accessible
picnic area. There is also a proposed five-foot-wide mulch path leading from the picnic area to
the end of the cul de sac and an ADA accessible path extended from this to the west side of the
site where the playground is. There are three (3) 15’x12’ exercise stations proposed throughout
the development.
In addition to these amenities, the applicant has proposed a series of benches and relaxation
stations scattered through the development. The relaxation stations include a bench, trash
receptacle, recycling receptacle, and smoking receptacle on a concrete pad. There are four (4)
relaxation stations and nine (9) stand-alone benches distributed throughout the proposed
development.
The plan shows tree plantings throughout the development, including areas adjacent to the
recreation amenities.
The following table provides information from the submitted Plan for the Active Recreation
Area:
Required Provided on Plan On Revised Plan
Active Recreation 150 S.F. per dwelling unit 12,050 SF provided as 11,567 SF provided as
Area or a minimum of 10,000 follows: follows:
(Article 5 §10.514) SF • Community Center • Community Center
77 DU = 11,550 SF Meeting and Activity Meeting and Activity
required Rooms Rooms
• Playground • Playground
• Age Oriented to • 5’ wide mulch path – • Tot Lot
development 277’ long • 5’ wide mulch path
• Parking • Picnic area with 8 • ADA accessible path
• Setbacks: 30 feet from tables and 8 grills • ADA picnic area with
residential lots and 25 • ADA picnic area with table and grill
feet from right-of-way table and grill • 9 benches
for street • 9 benches • Covered public area
• Landscaping • 4 relaxation stations • 4 relaxation stations
• Exercise stations • 3 Exercise stations
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The following are comments and recommendations from Staff of the Department of Planning &
Inspections following review of the Active Recreation Area Plan.
Paj 8
Walker Woods/Walker Woods II Redevelopment: Recreation Area Plan
Summary Report of Active Recreation Component
Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee Meeting on September 9, 2013
Page 3 of 3
1. Staff recommends approval of the Active Recreation Area Plan as submitted with the
following recommended changes:
a. Please provide additional detail on what amenities will be provided as a part of
the exercise stations.
b. The mulch path should include a defined edging that will prevent encroachment
of grass and/or weeds into the mulch path area.
c. Includes a grill at the picnic area.
2. The ability of the Site Development Plan for this project to move forward is subject to
City Council approval of the rezoning application (Z-13-02), which is scheduled for City
Council Action on Monday, September 9, 2013.
3. The project, including the Active Recreation Plan, is subject to review and approval of
the Site Development Plan by the Planning Commission, which includes:
a. Review of the building architecture for the community center;
b. Compliance of Site Development Plan with tree planning and landscape
requirements in the Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 – Supplementary Regulations,
§15 Landscape Guidelines and §16 Tree Planting and Preservation.
4. The applicant is reminded of the requirements for construction phasing of the recreation
area as associated with the development of the residential units.
10.6 Construction phasing. The recreation and open space areas shall be completed in a
proportion equal to or greater than the proportion of residential dwelling units completed,
except that 100 percent of the recreation and open space areas shall be completed prior
to issuing building permits for the final 20 percent of the dwelling units proposed. Building
permits shall not be issued for dwelling units unless the requirements of this section are
met.
5. There shall be provisions which ensure that the common open space land and community
room (including active recreation area) shall continue as such and be properly managed
and maintained. The developer shall either retain ownership and responsibility for
maintenance of such open land; or provide for and establish one (1) or more
organizations for the maintenance of all common open space.
a. Add a note on the Site Plan regarding who is responsible for maintenance, and
insurance on the common open space.
The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee shall submit to the Planning
Commission a report detailing the recommendations as to the Recreation Area Plan.
Attachments: Recreation Plan Sheet dated September 6, 2013.