Regular Council Packet - MM

CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 28, 2021 at 7:30 PM Virtual Via WebEx AGENDA VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE This meeting will be held electronically. Public participation information is as follows: Dial: 1-408-418-9388 Link: https://rb.gy/srb69m Event number: 173 079 8112 Event password: DOVER (if needed) If you are new to WebEx, get the app now at https://www.webex.com/ to be ready when the meeting starts. INVOCATION - Mayor Christiansen PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilman Rocha ADOPTION OF AGENDA ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All Consent Agenda items are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. PRESENTATIONS 1. City of Dover Electric Department (Dover Downs Casino) CONSENT AGENDA Page 1

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - June 28, 2021 PAGE 2 ADOPTION OF MINUTES 2. Special City Council Meeting - Budget Review of June 1 - 2, 2021 3. Special Council Meeting of June 14, 2021 4. Regular Council Meeting of June 14, 2021 COMMITTEE REPORTS 5. Economic Development Committee Report - April 13, 2021 6. Council Committee of the Whole Report - June 15, 2021 Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee 7. Presentation - Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) Master Plan (Diane Laird, Executive Director, DDP) 8. Evaluation of Bids – Fiscal Year 2021B Street and Alley Program (Sharon Duca, Public Works Director) (Committee recommendation: Award the contract to Grassbuster’s Landscaping Company, Inc. for the City of Dover Fiscal Year 2021B Street and Alley Program, Bid #21-0039PW, for the amount of $381,083.) 9. Elimination of the City Assessor's Position (Cheryl Bundek, City Assessor) (Committee recommendation: Table the discussion and bring it back at the next Council Committee of the Whole meeting with a Staff recommendation.) 10. Discussion of Business License Rates (Matt Harline, Assistant City Manager) (Committee recommendation: Refer the discussion back to Staff for continued work and to report back at a time that was convenient once the appropriate information had been gathered, including talking to the business community as well as any ordinances that may need to be done.) 11. Police Department Executive Compensation (Thomas Johnson, Police Chief) (Committee recommendation: Increase the Deputy Police Chief’s salary to $135,000 and increasing the Police Chief’s salary to $147,000, as recommended by Staff.) 12. Review of Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Annual Budget (Matt Harline, Interim City Manager) (Committee recommendation: Move the budget forward as amended by Staff to include a one cent tax increase, to put $25,000 into the Economic Development Budget, and to include the recommendation to have a 3% increase for non-bargaining employees and to have equity with the Chief and Deputy Chief’s positions.) Page 2

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - June 28, 2021 PAGE 3 APPOINTMENTS (REAPPOINTMENTS) RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR CHRISTIANSEN 13. Board of Adjustment - Richard D. Senato - Three-Year Term to Expire July 2024 14. Public Advisory Committee (PAC) of the Dover-Kent County MPO - Two Year Terms to Expire on July 1, 2023 A. Jonathan Contant B. Albert W. Holmes, Jr. C. Karen E. McGloughlin APPOINTMENTS RECOMMENDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT SUDLER 15. City Chaplain - Elder Ellis B. Louden (Presiding Elder of Dover District Delaware Conference) - One-Year Term to Expire June 2022 ITEMS NOT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ORDINANCES FINAL READING - The First Reading of the Proposed Ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of June 14, 2021. The ordinance is available at the entrance of the Council Chambers and on the City's website at www.cityofdover.com under "Government." 16. Ordinance #2021-15 - Fiscal Year 2021/2022 City of Dover Budget Ordinances CITY MANAGER’S ANNOUNCEMENTS COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. PURSUANT TO 29 DEL. C. §10004(e)(2), THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, WHICH ARISE AT THE TIME OF THE MEETING Page 3

Item #2. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING BUDGET REVIEW The Special City Council Meeting was held by video conference on June 1, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. with Council President Sudler presiding. Council members present via video or telephone were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Boggerty (arrived at 6:10 p.m.) Mr. Neil, Mr. Hare, Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Rocha, Mr. Taylor (arrived at 6:15 p.m.) and Mr. Lindell. Staff members present via video or telephone were Police Chief Johnson, Ms. Peddicord, Mr. Harline, Mr. Hugg, Mrs. Duca, Mr. Sylvester, Mr. Hamlett, Mr. Josefowski, Mrs. Hawkins, Mr. Eaton and Mrs. McDowell. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Hare and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty and Taylor absent). INTRODUCTION AND PRESENTATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2021 RECOMMENDED BUDGET AND HIGHLIGHTS OF OVER BUDGET Mr. Matthew Harline, Assistant City Manager, reviewed a presentation titled “FY 2021-2022 Proposed Budget with FY 22 - 26 Capital Improvement Program,” (Exhibit #1). Mr. Hare moved for Mr. Harline to give a quick overview of the budget and then allow Council to ask their questions. The motion failed for lack of a second. MAJOR FUND HIGHLIGHTS - GENERAL FUND Mr. Matthew Harline, Assistant City Manger, reviewed pages 7 - 38 of the “FY 2021-2022 Proposed Budget with FY 22 - 26 Capital Improvement Program.” Mr. Neil stated that if they wanted to get back to the current tax rate of 40 and a half cents, they were going to have to cut $2 million either in expenses or enhancements to bring in revenue. He asked if it would be possible to use money left over and if so, what would the tax rate be. Mr. Neil stated that they know some items like trucks need to be replaced and asked if they were to receive federal funds, not necessarily from the Recovery Act, but from Infrastructure, if passed by Congress. He asked if they could purchase those vehicles without having it in the current budget. Mr. Neil asked in terms of total enhancements that were proposed, if there were other enhancements that they could look at that would raise that amount so they could have money coming in. He noted that even though it would be a small amount, in combination with some of the delays, they may be able to stave off the total increase in the property tax. Responding to Mr. Neil, Mr. Harline stated that the current budget calls for a balance slightly over the 8% that is in the City policy and that it is a prudent reserve. He stated that 8% is about a month and a half worth of operating expenditures, so in the general fund there really is not left over money that he would recommend spending. Mr. Harline noted that, regarding additional revenue, they were in the process of doing a thorough comprehensive look at all of the fees and fines that the City Page 4

Item #2. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 1 - 2, 2021 PAGE 2 assesses. He advised that it would be difficult to get anywhere near $2 million from all of the sources if they increased those fees substantially, but that they might be able to find another $50,000 to $100,000 based on preliminary results. Mr. Harline stated that in addition to the sanitation fees and business licenses, they were looking at raising the fines for false alarms for the fire department because they were already looking at increasing the fines to the police department of about $30,000 total and that enhancement has been included. Mr. Harline advised that some of the proposed increases included disconnect fees and most of those fees would go to the utility for which they are disconnected. He stated that those fees tend to fall hardest on those who are least able to pay so that is not in this proposal and fees for credit card use were going to cover the actual costs. Mr. Harline advised that they do not like to charge a premium for bad checks, but they will review those fees. Mr. Harline stated that they are going to look at enhancements for red light cameras and review their agreement for the School Resource Officers. They are also looking at expenses that are not budgeted possibly in police. They could come up in some programmatic things that Mr. Harline and Police Chief Thomas Johnson have talked about. Mr. Harline advised that they did not know exactly how the costs for the mental health professionals ride along program would come out, but there is an assumption that they will get state funding. Mr. Neil asked about delaying items like the trucks and buying them if they had grant money or from other sources, possibly federal or infrastructure funds. Responding, Mr. Harline stated that he did not know, but that what he read of the infrastructure bills was that most of it is for projects. He noted that he would look and see if it is for vehicles and equipment and that those are the items that could allow them to reduce the fee. Mr. Harline stated that he did not feel responsible providing a budget based on possible federal funds that might come through for an infrastructure bill. He noted that they are going to be using equipment that is getting out of date and spending money repairing items that need to replaced. Mr. Harline advised that if that is the desire of Council, he would make it work, but that was not his recommendation at this time. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Harline stated that the capital projects that they have selected for this year’s budget are located in the proposed budget book under Capital Investment Plan and that he would provide the ones that have been delayed as well. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Harline stated that the Information Technology (IT) position for a LAN Analyst was for six months. He advised that the assumption was that they hire them for six months into the year and defer costs somewhat until next year. Responding to Mr. Rocha regarding the City’s parks, Mr. Harline provided the following information: • They have the Dover Park improvements which include a building and a splash pad and $310,000 budgeted in the current year. They are going to carry those funds into the next year and add that to the $690,000. That is their best estimate of how much it would cost Page 5

Item #2. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 1 - 2, 2021 PAGE 3 to do the building and splash pad. It is higher than they anticipated when they began developing the budget in January. • The skate park and dog park are budgeted in Fiscal Year 2023 and $800,000 budgeted for the Dover Park ADA Accessible playground. • They also knew they could not do all of the projects in one year, but with Council’s input they made the building a top priority and the splash pad is physically connected to that building. • If they were able to shift more money by using the American Recovery Project (ARP) money then they could put more into the Schutte Park skate park. Mr. Anderson, regarding creative cost shifting using the guidance of the ARP funds this year, stated that the ARP funds have the ability to be used for necessary older infrastructure. He stated that they could take about a half a million dollars of those funds and target it towards the older infrastructure. Mr. Anderson stated that they could use it to offset part of the stormwater portion of the general fund expense. He asked if they had calculated when about 50 staff members had to be off because of COVID. Mr. Anderson stated that they could recover their sick time and overtime that was required of other employees. He stated that he would email Mr. Harline the other ideas he had. Responding to Mr. Anderson regarding Tyler/Munis, Mr. Harline stated that the vast majority of the Munis costs are either covered directly or by transfers directly for Munis and that the vast majority of those funds are coming out of the electric fund, with a little from the water and wastewater funds. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Harline stated that much of the increase in streets is offset by state money. He advised that they are anticipating more money in Community Transportation Funds (CTF), but some of it is increased amount of transfer from the general fund. Mr. Hare asked how much money they would they save if they eliminated the North American Energy Services (NAES). Responding, Mr. Harline stated that he would get into that more the following day, but that it is about the operating of the plant and the lost revenue from the capacity in the first year is going to be fairly similar because they are going to have to pay for specific capacity. He noted that once the solar project comes online they are going to regain a lot of their capacity. Mr. Harline advised that they get credit for the physical plant or capacity that they own to generate electricity and McKee Run use to be a lot of that and they still have the VanSant Generating Station. He stated that the saved money in operations is going to be offset by a loss of capacity. Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Hare stated that there are about 100 to 150 fire alarms at Delaware State University (DSU) and a lot of those were attributed to the alarms going off in dorms. He noted that there are no contributions to the fire department from DSU or Wesley College. Mr. Hare stated that there were close to 100 alarms at Wesley College and Wilmington University had some, but not as many as the others. He advised that if they have a run fee that applies to everybody with the first two runs being free, then it could cut it down or they would start getting the revenue back to the fire department. Page 6

Item #2. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 1 - 2, 2021 PAGE 4 Mr. Boggerty asked if it was permissible to charge safety fees on nonprofits. He asked how they encourage them to pay a fee or give a donation and asked what message they send to their nonprofits. Responding, Mr. Hare stated that the ones that came in and complained the most were the ones who were going to have a public safety fee of $50.00. He stated that Bay Health has stepped up and contributed and helped the fire company immensely. They have also helped the police department with the Police Athletic League (P.A.L.) with contributions. Mr. Sudler advised that the legal opinion was that federally they could not provide any fee to a nonprofit according to state and federal statutes. He noted that DSU has contributed in other ways, such as partnering and trying to help with economic development and helped the City through finding grants and suitable applicants for job positions. Mr. Anderson advised that there were ways to do it, but it was problematic. He noted that the run fee Mr. Hare noted would be permissible, but a fee for police services, which is a general tax function, would be hard to pass unless it was tied to a service like false alarms. Mr. Neil noted that if they had a public relations problem, they have some people who did PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) programs and, unless everybody who was in this program as it was originally presented would pay their money, they would actually lose money from the organizations that voluntarily paid the City a PILOT. He noted that there was a balancing factor and that it was bad publicity because they cannot apply it just in one segment. Mr. Anderson stated that since they have the co-chairs of the Joint Finance Committee for the first time that it would be wise for them to pen a letter. He noted that the state has $800 million surplus to increase the PILOT, which has not been done in decades. Mr. Anderson suggested adjusting the formula slightly, noting that $1 million is under inflation for the last 10 years. He noted that it would be wise for Council to formally send a letter requesting that. Mr. Sudler stated that is one of the main objectives they would like Mr. Anderson and Mrs. Arndt to look into as liaisons to Kent County and to make this a top priority in that initiative. Mr. Anderson stated that he wanted to touch base with Mrs. Arndt and see if they would have a draft for the next evening and then they make a motion so they could discuss it. Mr. Anderson moved that a letter be drafted now. Mr. Sudler asked if Mr. Anderson would amenable to get feedback from his co-liaison, Mrs. Arndt, to prepare a draft and bring it tomorrow. Mr. Anderson stated that Mrs. Arndt’s skills would be valued and noted that he would value Mr. Hare’s input as well. Mrs. Arndt asked if they were talking about the state property and the payment in lieu of taxes and not about issues specific to Kent County and realty transfer taxes. She noted that while they have been talking, she reached out to a legislator for information on the process. Mrs. Arndt stated that she was willing to pursue that and do some research. Mr. Sudler requested a moment of silence for those who have served the country and those who have lost their lives doing so. He stated that they greatly appreciate and value their dedication and commitment to the United States of America. Page 7

Item #2. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 1 - 2, 2021 PAGE 5 Mr. Anderson moved to recess the meeting, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Meeting recessed at 8:13 p.m. TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 2021- 6:00 - 9:00 p.m. The Special Council Meeting - Budget Review reconvened on June 2, 2021 at 6:01 p.m. with Council President Sudler presiding. Council members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Neil, Mr. Hare, Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Rocha, Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Lindell. Council staff members present were Mr. Harline, Mr. Waddell and Mrs. McDowell. By unanimous consent, the meeting reconvened. Mr. Matt Harline, Assistant City Manager, reviewed a presentation titled “FY 2021-2022 Proposed Budget with FY 22 - 26 Capital Improvement Program,” (Exhibit #2). ELECTRIC FUND Mr. Matt Harline, Assistant City Manager, reviewed pages 19-28 of “FY 2021-2022 Proposed Budget with FY 22 - 26 Capital Improvement Program.” Mr. Harline advised that most of the 600 plus LED lights for phase one of the LED Streetlight project were installed and that there were about 80 left. Mr. Paul Waddell, Electric Director, noted that they would be there that week. Responding to Mr. Hare, Mr. Harline stated that for everything, the entire bill to the North American Energy Services (NAES) is about $6 million. He advised that if NAES were to get the contract to continue running the VanSant Generating Station, they have budgeted for the contractual services, based on some early models, $1.7 million, but that it was going to be less. Mr. Harline stated that when they were operating as an ancillary operation to the power plant and were on site there were some cost savings with the staff there. Responding to Mr. Hare, Mr. Harline stated that they have been working with the management at McKee Run and for NAES. He noted that some use to work for the City. Mr. Hare asked if there had been consideration of not putting a contract out there and letting those people that are running the operation now work for the City. He stated that if they were to take their salaries even with benefits, they were going to be under $480,000. Mr. Harline stated that a lot of the costs for operating the plant are environmental reporting, financial tracking and connecting to the PJM grid. He stated that they have looked at that possibility, but that is the cost to actually run that plant with all the different parts. He advised that they have built the costs for materials into that $1.7 million. The City and the Energy Authority (TEA) firmly believe that strategy and hiring out all the expertise they would need for all the other pieces are a small amount of costs to actually turning on and running the plant. Mr. Harline advised that is not going to be $480,000 to run the plant with the people who live in town. Mr. Hare stated that if NAES gets Page 8

Item #2. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 1 - 2, 2021 PAGE 6 the contract, they would be making money off of it which they get through TEA. Responding to Mr. Hare, Mr. Harline stated that if NAES puts in a proposal that is above what the market will bear they would lose the contract. He stated that the only viable way to do this is to continue paying NAES or someone else. Mr. Harline advised that he has discussed the idea of the City running the VanSant Generation Station with the representatives of TEA and NAES. He stated that there are a number of different disciplines, environmental tests and reporting requirements that nobody on the City staff can train the NAES personnel to do. He stated that NAES has that expertise, along with other firms. He noted that they can do the onsite work that needs to be done to keep the plant functioning, but there are a lot of other pieces that are done offsite and that the City would have to purchase those costs. Mr. Harline advised that he spoke with Stacy Johnson from NAES, and their charge will be much more if they do not have the rest of the operation and would charge a premium to do it on a cafeteria basis, which would require the City to go out for another set of RFPs. He stated that having discussed that possibility directly with Ms. Arlene Newton and other members of the TEA staff, they strongly recommend against trying to pursue that course of action. Ms. Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer, regarding the transfer to the general fund from the electric fund, stated that she thought the transfer should be $10 million instead of $11 million. She stated that those changes and the transfer could decrease their net income, which offsets some of the abilities for them to cover operations, capital costs and infrastructure. Ms. Peddicord advised that the higher that they increase that in any given year, based on the changes in the projections, is going to drive down the net income and decrease the cash. She noted that she wanted to make sure that everyone was aware that changing that variable does have an effect, and that it also could affect their bond ratings. Responding to Mr. Hare, Ms. Peddicord stated that she did not know how much excess money was in the electric fund. She stated that they have financial policies that they are suppose to follow that houses the reserves for particular programs, replacements, contingency funds, and capital asset replacements. Mr. Hare stated that if they were to transfer more, it was going to reduce the net profits, but they have the money in the fund to give a refund back to the electric rate users, nonprofits and the people that do not pay taxes. He stated that if it costs $100 million to run the City and with all of the funds they have, they bring in $140 million, then why are they raising taxes. Mr. Harline stated that the ordinance from last year has the amounts in each of the reserves. He noted that there are specific reserves for specific things, and it is over $20 million. Mr. Harline advised that they have $10 million that they carefully set aside for the deconstruction of the power plant with a very long range and thoughtful process. WATER FUND Mr. Matt Harline, Assistant City Manager, reviewed pages 5-11 of “”FY 2021-2022 Proposed Budget with FY 22 - 26 Capital Improvement Program.” Mr. Harline advised that they have completed the Water Master Plan Update, West Street, West Page 9

Item #2. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 1 - 2, 2021 PAGE 7 Alley and Ross Street replacement of water lines. He stated that they have started with the contract for painting and other maintenance on the water towers. Mr. Harline advised that in FY22, they are looking at improving resiliency of the water treatment plant with a purchase of a mobile generator. Mr. Jason Lyon, Water and Wastewater Director, advised that it is not a wastewater treatment plant, it is a pump station. WASTEWATER FUND Mr. Matt Harline, Assistant City Manager, reviewed pages 12-18 of “FY 2021-2022 Proposed Budget with FY 22 - 26 Capital Improvement Program.” Mr. Harline advised that there was a slight decrease in the transfers and that there were expenses of $271,000, about 3.7% compared to the FY21 budget. He noted that they were expecting the service fees to have a 5.4% increase due to rate increase. Responding to Mr. Harline, Mr. Jason Lyon, Water and Wastewater Director, advised that the groundwater inflow adjustment would be going up this year with the other rates. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Harline advised that in constructing the budget, they were very conservative in trying to allocate any resources from the American Rescue Plan (ARP) fund. He noted that he did not disagree with Mr. Anderson’s assessment on almost everything he said that it could possibly be budgeted for. Mr. Harline noted that the $700,000 for the Innovative Readiness Training (IRT) project was never a City budgeted item, but it is a resource loss to the City. He noted that Mr. Taylor challenged them to look for a full $1.9 million worth of savings which he had, but was not ready, but he could share that. He noted that they could work with the 2% directed at the increases for public safety. Mr. Harline stated that there are some other places, particularly in the Water/Wastewater system, where they could find supportable uses for the ARP funds that they are anticipating. He noted that there are different ways that they could approach this by trying to come up with an ARP budget between now and June 14th for original adoption, for original presentation on June 28th , or they could work on a list of items, particularly in Water/Wastewater, and then some in general fund, then some other needs and wants in the community that Mr. Anderson mentioned. Mr. Harline stated that he had the cuts that he could propose from Mr. Taylor’s request. He noted that since they originally put the budget together in April he met with the department heads and shaved about $860,000 in expenditures, before they showed Council the budget that he originally asked for a 5.5% property tax increase. He advised that they could put together a budget with cuts, additional defensible revenue, easily defensible revenue enhancements through ARP funds, and then create a second list of things that if they could make a good argument for it, that they would also fund with ARP funds. Mr. Harline recommended having a primary list where they are comfortable, that they can count those revenues for those projects, put that into the ordinance that they present and then come back with a supplemental budget when they do a budget amendment to close out FY21 and carry forward into FY22. Mr. Harline reviewed a spreadsheet depicting the cuts proposed by staff and Council (Exhibit #3). He advised that he did not think they could cut without a significant burden and that the total costs could add back $194,000 of the spending and not raise the property tax. Page 10

Item #2. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 1 - 2, 2021 PAGE 8 Mr. Harline stated that they budgeted $200,000 for moving expenses for the City Manager, which also could have been used for any search this year and they usually budget $200,000 in legal expenses. He noted that they usually end up transferring that to projects that come up during the year, so they could probably cut some of that. Mr. Harline noted that there was a proposed program for a small amount of money to be paid to people if they referred somebody successfully for employment with the City, $10,000 was set aside for that. There is a proposal along with the rest of the Segal study for pay for performance, and the former City Manager Randy Robertson suggested $40,000 for that in the budget. He stated that they could remove $20,000 and still have the opportunity to address some type of a pay for performance incentives in FY22 or remove the entire $20,000. Mr. Harline advised that there were suggestions in the Segal study for advancing up in the range rather than just the base moving up , they based it on years in their current position and it’s market, or where the study recommends that the range for that job should be. He noted that there are also some positions which would probably be reclassified and that he did not want to get rid of all of that money, because there are some legitimate suggestions. Mr. Harline stated that based on the discussion with Council and with Segal, he would want to leave some money in for some of those positions. Mr. Harline stated that there is $100,000 in the Mayor’s budget for economic development, but if they cut out 25%, that would save $25,000. He noted that they were increasing the payment to the fire department, if they cut that from a $3,500 increase to only $2,500 increase, they would save $1,000. He noted that they budgeted $120,000 annually, even though the contract for life safety for the ambulance contract is $100,000 a year. The additional $20,000 was in case there were calls that outside vendors were required to respond to. He noted that so far, they had never needed the full $20,000 or anywhere near it, so they could cut that total money budgeted from $120,000 to $110,000 and free up $10,000 and still cover their $100,000 contract with St. Francis to provide annual ambulance service within the City of Dover. Mr. Harline stated that they have two trucks for code enforcement that could survive another year, one is replacing an old Crown Vic. He noted that they have budgeted $250,00 for demolition and the most that they have ever used is around $150,000, so they could cut that. Mr. Harline stated that he spoke with Police Chief Thomas Johnson, and he was forthcoming and trying to make offers that would help them reach the $1.9 million cut. He noted that if Chief Johnson deferred hiring four officers for six months it could save $199,000. He stated that they have to keep their staffing level up because they have accepted the COPS grant. Mr. Harline advised that they could save $199,000 by diverting that by a half a season, and they could probably survive with eight Tahoe SUVs instead of nine, six of those would go to patrol directly. Mr. Harline mentioned eliminating the Information Technology (IT) LAN analysts completely, instead of having one for the last six months. He noted that delaying the facilities craftsperson for six months would save $29,500; however, the department would prefer that the position not be removed. Mr. Harline advised that there is currently a crew of three and if they are doing a task that requires spotting another worker they cannot have two crews. If they have four workers, they can split to two crews and double their effectiveness. He noted that the department would prefer to have Page 11

Item #2. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 1 - 2, 2021 PAGE 9 the position for the full year, but at least for half the year. Mr. Harline noted that they could defer the $380,000 Street and Alley Project to Townsend Boulevard, Project Kent, North and South Alley, and save $818,000. He advised that if they do not buy the asphalt hotbox it would save $43,000. Mr. Harline noted that if they do not get rid of a 2000 backhoe, they would save $125,000. If they did not get rid of a 2001 dump truck, they would save $156,000. There is a yard waste truck that could be pushed back a year, although it is heavily used. They have $300,000 plus for a vac truck and it is possible that they could save an estimated $150,000 by buying a used truck. Mr. Harline noted that they do not use it daily, but frequently, and that is for eliminating blockages in the stormwater. Mr. Harline noted that in Parks and Recreation, there is a old van that Ms. Sherwanda Rachal, Recreation Program Specialist, drives and it is functional so they could delay that for $31,000. He noted that there is always something else they could cut, but those are the items that would have less of a debilitating effect on City operations. Mr. Harline advised that he mentioned over $2,100,000 worth of cuts. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mr. Harline stated that all of those items they would be put off until next year. He stated that there were a couple of items that are choices and that they would be dealing with the same problem next year. Mr. Harline stated that all of those vehicles will have to be replaced and they bought no police cruisers last year. He noted that Mr. Casey Wallace, Mechanic, and his staff, baby the vehicles and have saved hundreds of thousands of dollars in maintenance and successfully deferred some expenses, but it does not last forever. They have to replace those items and do the road maintenance. Mr. Lindell asked if they had done a cost estimate to show taxpayers how much they were hemorrhaging from keeping these outdated vehicles around and the lack of cost effectiveness. Responding, Mr. Harline sated that Mr. Mike Hamlett, Central Services Director, could put something together. Mr. Lindell stated that he was talking about man hours with manufacturing their own parts. He noted that there has to be a point where it becomes counterproductive. Responding, Mr. Harline stated that information was a part of the analysis that Mr. Hamlett does every year. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mr. Harline stated that they have reduced the number of staff members in the whole Central Services department, primarily in fleet maintenance and in building maintenance. He noted that fleet maintenance was steady, but the building maintenance is where they have really cut people. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Harline stated that the vehicles that needed to be replaced were costing the City more. He noted that there was also lost of time having the vehicles in service. Mr. Harline advised that the cost of repair is where they were getting past the point of diminishing return based on Mr. Hamlett’s assessment. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Harline stated that some of the vehicles were coming up on 20 years old. Mr. Rocha recommended finding money in the budget for vehicles that they could not longer get parts for. Page 12

Item #2. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 1 - 2, 2021 PAGE 10 Mr. Anderson moved to authorize sending the draft letter regarding the PILOT with the right to have the signers and Staff make technical corrections in formatting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Taylor. Mr. Lindell requested clarification on the motion. Mrs. Arndt stated that the letter was requesting the opportunity to revisit or to evaluate an increase in the percentage that Dover receives from the state. She noted that there is also a Senate bill being considered that is in committee and that bill does not increase the percentage for Dover. It proposes the addition of Newark to the program and for Newark to receive a percentage of their property tax from the state. Mrs. Arndt stated that there is an opportunity to work with the legislators to make changes to that bill to increase Dover's percentage. She noted that the letter is going to two of their local legislators, seeking a one-time increase to Dover. Mr. Sudler asked how could they incorporate that or integrate that into what they currently have as a long-term opportunity versus a short-term. He asked if they could pass this motion here or add that to the motion as an amendment. Responding, Mrs. Arndt stated that the letter as written does make mention of re-evaluating the percentage that is granted and that it is okay to move forward. Mr. Sudler asked Mr. Anderson and Mrs. Arndt to draft the recommendations and a second letter expressing the long-term opportunity through the body that would not only be able to recognize that but also authorize it. Mr. Anderson moved to authorize sending the draft letter regarding the PILOT with the right to have the signers and Staff make technical corrections in formatting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Taylor and unanimously carried. Mr. Neil stated that Mr. Harline brought up a contingency plan in terms of what would happen if they received the additional federal money, which they do not know if it is coming or the amount. Mr. Harline asked if they wanted him to bring back the cuts that have been described to reduce the potential tax increase to two cents or less, using discretion with whatever it is to get to that amount. He stated that he received guidance from one Councilman specifically saying to keep the officers, LAN analyst, crafts persons, the asphalt hotbox and the dump truck. He stated that he could work with staff to see if there are some trade-offs within there, and then come back with a package of things where they believe that there could be ARP money that would be either revenue offsets in the general fund or projects in the water and wastewater fund to come up with a secondary plan for additional expenditures. Mr. Harline stated that he would prefer to have that ready for Council either on the 14th or 15th. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Harline advised that last year the full amount for the economic development fund was $100,000 in the Mayor’s budget. He noted that it is used for a variety of different economic development and enhancement activities. Mr. Harline stated that in FY20, $90,866 of the $100,000 was spent. Mr. Sudler noted that while the Segal Study was a good study, there was no evidence-based observations done to confirm what duties were being done versus what was actually being done. He Page 13

Item #2. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 1 - 2, 2021 PAGE 11 noted that there is a discrepancy in providing or increasing individuals pay based off of assessment with no evidence-based observations. Mr. Sudler recommended that entire budget be forfeited or cut. Mr. Neil moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mr. Anderson. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mr. Sudler stated that they were adjourning and waiting for another meeting with Mr. Harline to update Council in a couple of weeks on the supplemental budget. Mr. Harline stated that he would have an update on June 15th during the Council Committee of the Whole/Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee. Mr. Neil moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:38 p.m. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All ordinances, resolutions, motions, and orders adopted by City Council during their Special Meeting - Budget Review of June 1-2, 2021 are hereby approved. ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /TM S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Council-Minutes\2021\06-01-2021 SPECIAL COUNCIL - BUDGET REVIEW.wpd Exhibits Exhibit #1 - Presentation titled “FY 2021-2022 Proposed Budget with FY 22 - 26 Capital Improvement Program” Exhibit #2 - Presentation titled “FY 2021-2022 Proposed Budget with FY 22 - 26 Capital Improvement Program” Exhibit #3 - Spreadsheet depicting the cuts proposed by staff and Council Page 14

EXHIBIT #1 Special Council Meeting - Budget Review of 06/01 and Item 06/02/2021 #2. City of Dover FY 2021 -2022 Proposed Budget With FY 22 – 26 Capital Improvement Program Page 15

Item #2. MAJOR FUND HIGHLIGHTS • General Fund • Electric Fund • Water Fund • Wastewater Fund Page 16

Item #2. MAJOR FUND HIGHLIGHTS Adherence to Financial Policies Water and General Water Wastewater Wastewater Electric Fund Utility Utility Fund Fund * Revenues 48,354,900 7,349,100 10,470,600 17,819,700 87,057,400 Expenses (49,780,626) (7,353,200) (8,635,300) ($15,988,500) (80,815,300) Surplus/(Deficit) ($1,425,726) ($4,100) $1,835,300 $1,831,200 $6,242,100 Ending Budget Balance 3,915,174 $637,900 $3,507,570 $4,145,470 $11,959,500 % of Revenue 8.1% 8.7% 33.5% 23.3% 13.7% Beginning Budget Balance 5,340,900 642,000 1,672,270 $2,314,270 10,913,400 Less PCA Credit (5,196,000) Adjusted Beginning Budget Balance 5,717,400 Capital Improvement Transfers 4,385,900 1,536,100 799,200 $2,335,300 3,711,100 Revenue Policy #6 x ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Budget Balance Policy #1 ✓ ✓ x ✓ ✓ Expenditure Policy #3 x ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Page 17

Item #2. MAJOR FUND HIGHLIGHTS Fee and Transfer Trends – General Fund Major Rate & Fee Trends Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Proposed GENERAL FUND 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 Property Tax Rate Approved $0.3378 $0.3378 $0.3378 $0.4050 $0.4050 $0.4050 $0.4050 $0.4400 $0.4050 $0.4600 Proposed Property Tax Rate Increase $0.0551 $0.0350 ($0.0350) $0.0550 Trash Fees (in City) $17.00 $17.00 $17.00 $17.00 $17.00 $21.00 $21.00 $21.00 $21.00 $23.00 Trash Fees (outside City) $42.75 $42.75 $42.75 $42.75 $42.75 $54.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A Transfer from Electric Utility $8 million $8 million $10 million $10 million $10 million $10 million $10 million $10 million $10 million $11 million % of Electric Fund Revenues 8.3% 9.6% 12.5% 12.2% 12.3% 12.2% 12.2% 11.8% 11.8% 12.6% % of General Fund Revenues 22.3% 22.5% 25.7% 23.9% 23.7% 23.4% 23.4% 22.0% 21.4% 22.7% Transfer from Water/Wastewater Utility $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $850,000 $875,000 $900,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 % of Water/Wastewater Fund Revenues 3.7% 3.6% 3.4% 5.7% 5.7% 5.8% 5.8% 5.8% 5.7% 5.7% % of General Fund Revenues 1.4% 1.1% 1.3% 2.0% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 2.1% Page 18

Item #2. MAJOR FUND HIGHLIGHTS Fee and Transfer Trends – Enterprise Funds Major Rate & Fee Trends Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Proposed WATER/WASTEWATER FUND 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 Water per 1,000 gal (Tier 1) $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.49 $2.66 Water per 1,000 gal (Tier 2) $3.11 $3.33 Water per 1,000 gal (Outside City Tier 1) $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $3.74 $4.00 Water per 1,000 gal (Outside City Tier 2) $4.67 $5.00 Water Customer Charge $1.25 $1.25 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $5.00 $5.00 Wastewater per 1,000 gal. Charge $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.84 $3.03 Wastewater per 1,000 gal (Outside City) $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $4.25 $4.55 Wastewater Customer Charge $1.25 $1.25 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $5.00 $5.00 Kent County Sewer Treatment Fee - Rate set by County $2.34 $2.34 $2.34 $2.34 $2.34 $2.34 $2.34 $2.58 $2.58 $2.58 Kent County Sewer Adjustment (I & I flows) $1.05 $1.05 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.61 $1.72 ELECTRIC FUND Residential Rates $0.1316 $0.1204 $0.1204 $0.1203 $0.1203 $0.1203 $0.1206 $0.1206 $0.1209 $0.1209 Increase % -3.5% -8.5% 0.0% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% Power Cost Adjustment ($0.00252) ($0.00855) ($0.00382) ($0.00382) ($0.00700) ($0.00700) Electric Fund Customer Charge $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $7.50 $7.50 $7.50 $8.46 $8.46 $9.42 $9.42 Reconnect Fees $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 Return Check Fees $25 $25 $25 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 Page 19

Item #2. MAJOR FUND HIGHLIGHTS Fee and Transfer Affects • $250,000 home with 8 Tgal usage per month ❖ Water bill increase $17.52/year ❖ Wastewater increase $28.80/year ❖ Property tax increase $137.50/year ❖ $183.82 Total increase • $150,000 home with 4 Tgal usage per month ❖ Water bill increase $8.16/year ❖ Wastewater increase $14.40/year ❖ Property tax increase $82.50/year ❖ $105.06 Total increase Page 20

Item #2. GENERAL FUND BUDGET REVIEW Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Presented June 1, 2021 Page 21

• General Fund Item #2. Public Safety, General & Community Services Police * Fire * Life Safety * Code Enforcement Planning * Public Inspections * Library * Parks, Recreation & Grounds * Streets * Stormwater * Sanitation * Tax Assessor Support Services for all City Operations Mayor * City Council * City Clerk * City Manager * Finance * Customer Service * Human Resources * Information Technology * Procurement & Inventory * Public Works Administration * Facilities Management * Fleet Maintenance Page 22

Item #2. General Fund Revenues - Summary GRANTS 4.8% COURT OF CHANCERY FEES POLICE FINES & FEES 2.9% 2.9% LICENSES & PERMITS FRANCHISE FEES 6.0% 1.2% TRANSFER TAXES LIBRARY & RECREATION 2.9% FEES 1.0% SANITATION FEES OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 7.1% RECEIPTS 0.4% INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 11.1% PROPERTY TAXES 34.9% UTILITY TRANSFERS 24.8% Page 23

Item #2. General Fund Revenues - Summary • Projected revenues without enhancement will be inadequate • Major increases affecting revenues • Asking for a $0.055 increase in the Property Tax $1.93 M • Increased transfer from Electric Fund $1.0 M • Incorporating a small amount of ARP funding (Library, Parks) $520,000 • Recommending an increase in Sanitation Fees $330,400 • COPS Grants transfer for salary $308,900 • Increase/Adjust Business Licenses $100,000 (net + $30,000) • Major decreases affecting revenues • Fund balance (end FY 20 v end FY 21) is projected lower $1.13 M • W/o adjustment business licenses $70,000 Page 24

Item #2. General Fund Revenues - Summary • Forecast model without revenue enhancement • Expenditures have exceeded revenues for three consecutive fiscal years • Trends in revenues are stagnant and labor and material costs continue to increase Page 25

General Fund Revenues – Item #2. Property Taxes CITY OF DOVER PROPERTY ASSESSMENT PROJECTION 2020 BASE YEAR TAXABLE ASSESSED VALUE AS OF APRIL 8 2021 $ 3,588,943,800.00 $ 3,588,943,800.00 Abatement Incentives $ (35,642,700.00) $ (35,642,700.00) Filed Tax Exemption Requests $ (4,691,400.00) $ (4,691,400.00) Supplemental Billing (April) (ALREADY INCLUDED IN TAXABLE VALUE) Annual Appeals Estimate Only $ (5,000,000.00) $ (5,000,000.00) Senior Citizen/Disability Exemption(approx 400 approved; revenue loss $81,000) Estimate Only $ (20,000,000.00) $ (20,000,000.00) TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE $ 3,523,609,700.00 $ 3,523,609,700.00 CITY OF DOVER PROJECTED PROPERTY TAX RECEIPTS ACCRUAL METHOD OF ACCOUNTING 7/01/21 - 6/30/22 Using a tax of $0.405 or $0.460 per $100 of assessment, the estimated gross 7/01/21 billing will be $ 14,270,619.29 $ 16,208,604.62 Penalties $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 Estimated Quarterly Billing $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 PROJECTED PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT SUBTOTAL $ 14,362,619.29 $ 16,300,604.62 Pay In Lieu of Taxes ESTIMATE Luther Towers; State of Delaware; Milford Housing; DE State Housing Auth; $ 552,700.00 $ 552,700.00 Dover Housing Authority; Whatcoat Village; Liberty Court $ - $ - PROJECTED PROPERTY TAX RECEIPTS FOR FY 2022 $ 14,915,319.29 $ 16,853,304.62 $0.01 of tax rate equates to: $ 352,360.97 PROJECTED DOVER REALTY TRANSFER TAX RECEIPTS $ 1,100,000.00 $ 1,400,000.00 Page 26

Item #2. General Fund Revenues – Sanitation Rates CURRENT RATES & REVENUES FY 2022 PROPOSED RATES & REVENUES FY 2023 PROPOSED RATES & REVENUES Rate Service # of Cont. Monthly Annual Rate Monthly Annual Rate Monthly Annual $21.00 Res. 90 gal 10,267 $215,600.00 $2,587,200.00 $23.00 $240,700.00 $2,888,400.00 $25.00 $266,700.00 $3,200,400.00 $24.00 RMH 280 6,700.00 80,400.00 $23.00 6,400.00 76,800.00 $25.00 $7,000.00 $84,000.00 $43.00 90 gal 2x 183 7,900.00 94,800.00 $46.00 8,400.00 100,800.00 $50.00 $9,200.00 $110,400.00 $63.00 90 cal 3x 6 400.00 4,800.00 $69.00 400.00 4,800.00 $75.00 $500.00 $6,000.00 $72.00 300 gal 358 25,800.00 309,600.00 $72.00 25,800.00 309,600.00 $75.00 $26,900.00 $322,800.00 $85.00 90 gal 4x 3 300.00 3,600.00 $92.00 300.00 3,600.00 $100.00 $300.00 $3,600.00 $143.00 300 gal 2x 20 2,900.00 34,800.00 $144.00 2,900.00 34,800.00 $150.00 $3,000.00 $36,000.00 SUBTOTALS 11,117 $259,600.00 $3,115,200.00 SUBTOTALS $284,900.00 $3,418,800.00 SUBTOTALS $313,600.00 $3,763,200.00 Bulk total $1,000.00 $12,000.00 Bulk total $1,000.00 $12,000.00 Bulk total $1,000.00 $12,000.00 TOTALS $260,600.00 $3,127,200.00 TOTALS $285,900.00 $3,430,800.00 TOTALS $314,600.00 $3,775,200.00 • Proposed rate increases for FY22 and FY23 • Operating Revenues only cover Expenditures with overhead allocation • These rate increases allow the Sanitation Department to progress toward being a stand-alone Enterprise Fund where rates cover operating costs, capital expenditures, overhead and admin, and build a prudent reserve Page 27

General Fund Expenditures - Item #2. Summary • Overall Expenditures are up 7.1% as compared to the FY21 Original Budget ($3.28M), mostly due to capital expenditures • Major increases affecting expenditures • Increased in transfer to CIP budget (%111) – $2.3M • Police Operations – $691,600 • A 3.9% overall increase • Five new officers in this year’s budget • Nine new police cars (in GF CIP budget) • Increase in Public Works CIP $2.3M • Persimmon Park funding from State • Increase in Streets & Sidewalk improvements ($556K) • Replacement vehicles left out of FY21 budget • Added personnel in Central Services • Added personnel in IT (budgeted at 6 months) Page 28

Item #2. General Fund Expenditures – Summary (cont.) • Major decreases affecting expenditures • Reduced Police – Extra Duty – but offset by reduced revenue • Cut $511,000 of original capital requests • Cut two positions from FY21 Customer Service budget • Denied requests for additional personnel Page 29

Item #2. General Fund Expenditures – Personnel City of Dover Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Personnel Table 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 DEPT/DIVISION BUDGET BUDGET RECOMMENDED CHANGE CITY CLERK 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 CITY MANAGER 5.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 CODE ENFORCEMENT 6.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 CUSTOMER SERVICES 16.0 16.0 14.0 (2.0) FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 5.0 4.0 6.0 2.0 FINANCE 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 FIRE DEPARTMENT 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 FLEET MAINTENANCE 7.0 6.0 5.0 (1.0) GROUNDS 14.0 14.0 14.0 0.0 HUMAN RESOURCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 4.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 INSPECTIONS 7.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 LIBRARY 14.0 14.0 15.0 1.0 LIFE SAFETY 3.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 MAYOR 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 PARKS AND RECREATION 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 PLANNING 6.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 POLICE - TOTAL* 135.0 135.0 140.0 5.0 PROCUREMENT AND INVENTORY 4.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION 7.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 SANITATION 10.0 11.0 11.0 0.0 STREETS 7.0 7.0 7.0 0.0 STORMWATER 7.0 7.0 7.0 0.0 TAX ASSESSOR 3.0 3.0 2.0 (1.0) GENERAL FUND AND CDBG TOTAL 294.0 293.0 298.0 5.0 *106 Offi cers ; 34 Ci vi l i a ns - 140 Total Empl oyees Page 30

Item #2. General Fund Expenditures – Segal Study Amount Below Time in Position Total Segal Job Title Business Unit Minimum Adjusment ($) Adjustments GIS Manager PW- Admin $0 $6,792 $6,792 Central Services Director Central Serv - Admin & Warehouse $3,406 $1,928 $5,333 Contract & Procurement Manager Central Serv - Admin & Warehouse $6,262 $3,300 $9,562 Assistant to the Dir Council Affairs & Constituent Svc City Clerk Dept $2,940 $0 $2,940 Assistant City Clerk City Clerk Dept $3,503 $0 $3,503 Executive Assistant to the City Manager City Manager Dept $0 $471 $471 Customer Service Supervisor Customer Services $1,870 $3,630 $5,500 Customer Service Manager Customer Services $0 $4,966 $4,966 Billing & Collections Supervisor Customer Services $4,564 $2,615 $7,179 Electric Director Electric -Admin $0 $657 $657 Construction Manager Engineering -PW $0 $4,724 $4,724 Civil Engineer I Engineering PW $0 $3,468 $3,468 Financial Reporting & Accounting Manager Finance Dept $0 $2,695 $2,695 Human Resources Coordinator Human Resources Dept $2,058 $2,420 $4,478 Human Resources Director Human Resources Dept $0 $10,113 $10,113 Human Resources Coordinator Human Resources Dept $3,410 $0 $3,410 Librarian II Library $0 $2,809 $2,809 Librarian II Library $4,398 $1,307 $5,705 Librarian I Library $2,885 $1,094 $3,979 Planner I Planning & Admin $3,098 $0 $3,098 Principal Planner Planning & Admin $0 $8,977 $8,977 Planner I Planning & Admin $3,098 $3,630 $6,728 Senior LAN Analyst Police Civilians $6,580 $4,238 $10,818 Field Supervisor II Recreation $11,322 $2,825 $14,147 Recreation Center Coordinator Recreation $0 $9,779 $9,779 Field Supervisor II Streets $6,434 $7,063 $13,497 $69,935 $108,217 $178,152 Page 31

Item #2. Page 32

Item #2. General Fund Expenditures – Summary By Expenditure Category Page 33

Item #2. Page 34

Item #2. City Manager 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 801,400 701,100 701,100 -13% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 7,500 43,100 43,100 475% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 235,900 244,500 244,500 4% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 1,044,800 988,700 988,700 -5% Highlights: • Decrease in Personnel Costs primarily due to changing of City Manger position. • Materials & Supplies increase due to web site update and reimbursement of moving expenses. • Key goal is to continue momentum on building relationships with Dover’s stakeholders Page 35

Item #2. City Manager 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE Highlights: PERSONNEL COSTS 801,400 701,100 701,100 -13% Decrease in Personnel Costs primarily due to changing of City Manger MATERIALS position. & SUPPLIES 7,500 43,100 43,100 475% Materials & Supplies increase due to web site update and ADMINISTRATIVE reimbursementEXPENDITURES 235,900 of moving expenses. 244,500 244,500 4% Key goal OPERATING is to continue momentum EXPENDITURES 1,044,800 on building 988,700 988,700 -5% relationships with Dover’s stakeholders Highlights: • Decrease in Personnel Costs primarily due to changing of City Manger position. • Materials & Supplies increase due to web site update and reimbursement of moving expenses. • Key goal is to continue momentum on building relationships with Dover’s stakeholders Page 36

Item #2. City Manager 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 801,400 701,100 701,100 -13% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 7,500 43,100 43,100 475% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 235,900 244,500 244,500 4% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 1,044,800 988,700 988,700 -5% Highlights: • Decrease in Personnel Costs primarily due to changing of City Manger position. • Materials & Supplies increase due to web site update and reimbursement of moving expenses. • Key goal is to continue momentum on building relationships with Dover’s stakeholders Page 37

Item #2. City Clerk 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 451,100 481,700 481,700 7% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 8,600 8,900 8,900 3% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 48,700 43,400 43,400 -11% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 508,400 534,000 534,000 5% Highlights: • Personnel Costs increase primarily due to increase in pension funding. • Slight decrease in Administrative Expense, over FY21, due to it being a non- election year. • Key goal is to redraw Council district lines once the 2020 Census infomration is available Page 38

Item #2. Customer Service 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 1,050,600 990,400 990,400 -6% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 35,500 35,000 35,000 -1% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 21,500 22,000 22,000 2% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 1,107,600 1,047,400 1,047,400 -5% Highlights: • Employee turnover is accounting for the decrease in Personnel Costs. • Other Operating Expenses will be relatively flat for FY22. • Key goals are: • Implementation of Utility billing in MUNIS-ERP software • Integrating Assessor functions and eliminating two vacant positions • Using technology and creativity to improve customer service • Hosting a student intern summer 2021 Page 39

Item #2. Finance Highlights: • Administrative Expenses decrease due to shifting MUNIS costs to General Fund non-operating • Key goal is implementing the MUNIS-ERP payroll/HR module and utility billing module Page 40

Item #2. Human Resources 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 424,000 455,800 455,800 8% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 32,000 93,200 143,200 348% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 68,200 49,300 49,300 -28% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 524,200 598,300 648,300 24% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 524,200 $ 598,300 $ 648,300 24% Highlights: • Segal Study Implementations figure into Personnel Cost increases (bottom of range only). • Pay for Performance and referral program added to Program Expense for Fy22. Page 41

Item #2. Information Services 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 593,400 479,200 479,200 -19% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 71,500 65,900 65,900 -8% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 247,900 192,800 192,800 -22% OPERATING EXPENSES 912,800 737,900 737,900 -19% CAPITAL OUTLAY 61,600 26,600 26,600 -57% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 974,400 $ 764,500 $ 764,500 -22% Highlights: • Personnel Costs decrease; FY21 saw the retiring of the IT Director, position as well as replacement was budgeted in FY21. • New LAN Analyst budgeted for second half of the year. • Key goals are: • Improved and enhanced cybersecurity techniques and possibly equipment • Evaluate and replace/update phone system • Improved turnaround on help-desk items Page 42

Item #2. Library 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 1,327,900 1,454,900 1,454,900 10% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 83,400 83,500 83,500 0% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 411,400 319,800 319,800 -22% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 1,822,700 1,858,200 1,858,200 2% CAPITAL OUTLAY - 25,000 25,000 100% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,822,700 $ 1,883,200 $ 1,883,200 3% Highlights: • New full-time Director and Assistant director added to staff. • Reduction in Contractual Services driving decline in Administrative Expenditures. • Capital Outlay for temperature control in facility. • Key goals are: • Reducing barriers to use of the library and building relationships with DAFB and others • Celebrating the Dover Public Library’s 80th anniversary Page 43

Item #2. Recreation 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 820,500 870,100 870,100 6% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 77,300 88,400 88,400 14% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 231,900 231,800 231,800 0% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 1,129,700 1,190,300 1,190,300 5% CAPITAL OUTLAY 395,000 787,000 787,000 99% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,524,700 $ 1,977,300 $ 1,977,300 30% Highlights: • Personnel Cost increases due mainly to the raise in Temporary Help wages and pension. • Increase in Materials & Supplies due to the addition of $15k in playground repairs (included in CIP in previous years). • Replacing vehicle • Key goals • Constructing Dover Park building and Spray pad. • Small park revitalization Page 44

Item #2. Police 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS $ 17,424,300 $ 17,989,876 $ 17,879,826 3% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 352,000 372,000 359,000 2% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 793,600 772,600 772,600 -3% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 18,569,900 19,134,476 19,011,426 2% CAPITAL OUTLAY 912,400 588,600 588,600 -35% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 19,482,300 $ 19,723,076 $ 19,600,026 1% Highlights: • Five new officers hired and community policing fully staffed in FY22 • Replace nine vehicles (2 budgeted in FY21) • Increase in operating somewhat offset by decrease in capital expenditures • Key goals • Implementing body-worn cameras program • Expansion of the camera system Page 45

Item #2. Recreation 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 450,400 632,200 632,200 40% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 28,600 25,700 27,600 -3% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 176,800 177,200 177,200 0% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 655,800 835,100 837,000 28% CAPITAL OUTLAY 700,000 50,000 - -100% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,355,800 $ 885,100 $ 837,000 -38% Highlights: • Employee turnover is accounting for the decrease in Personnel Costs. • Other Operating Expenses will be relatively flat for FY22. • Key goals are: • Implementation of Utility billing in MUNIS-ERP software • Integrating Assessor functions and eliminating two vacant positions • Using technology and creativity to improve customer service • Hosting a student intern summer 2021 Page 46

Central Services – Facilities Item #2. Management 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 450,400 632,200 632,200 40% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 28,600 25,700 27,600 -3% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 176,800 177,200 177,200 0% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 655,800 835,100 837,000 28% CAPITAL OUTLAY 700,000 50,000 - -100% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,355,800 $ 885,100 $ 837,000 -38% Highlights: • Adding one new position in Maintenance • Shifting half of the expenses of F&F Manager from Fleet Maintenance to Facilities • Weyandt Hall HVAC project Page 47

Item #2. Planning – Code Enforcement 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 530,400 467,400 467,400 -12% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 26,000 27,600 27,600 6% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 258,600 259,100 259,100 0% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 815,000 754,100 754,100 -7% CAPITAL OUTLAY - 50,300 50,300 100% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 815,000 $ 804,400 $ 804,400 -1% Highlights: • Capital outlay includes the purchase of two new vehicles • Key goal • Thorough housing assessment Page 48

Item #2. Planning – Life Safety (Fire Marshal) 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 277,700 316,600 316,600 14% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 8,900 45,600 22,400 152% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 146,100 142,800 142,800 -2% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 432,700 505,000 481,800 11% CAPITAL OUTLAY 48,900 - - -100% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 481,600 $ 505,000 $ 481,800 0% Highlights: • Increase in supplies is for lighting package for incident response. • Knox Box upgrade delayed a year. • Personnel increases due largely to health insurance increase (coverage choices made by staff changed). Page 49

Item #2. Public Works - Streets 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 547,600 480,400 480,400 -12% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 118,900 120,000 120,000 1% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 33,200 35,200 35,200 6% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 699,700 635,600 635,600 -9% CAPITAL OUTLAY 936,000 1,492,000 1,492,000 59% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,635,700 $ 2,127,600 $ 2,127,600 30% Highlights: • Major Capital projects include purchase of a dump truck, and new backhoe and an asphalt “hotbox” that will allow staff to make hot-mix repairs without renting equipment Page 50

Item #2. Public Works - Stormwater 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 420,200 408,600 408,600 -3% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 70,200 105,400 105,400 50% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 295,500 304,400 259,600 -12% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 785,900 818,400 773,600 -2% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,110,700 2,896,200 2,546,200 129% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,896,600 $ 3,714,600 $ 3,319,800 75% Highlights: • Capital expenditures include major improvements to Persimmon Park drainage, purchase of a streetsweeper and a vac truck • Major goal • Hire/promote manager of a Stormwater Utility Page 51

Item #2. Tax Assessor 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022 % DESCRIPTION BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED CHANGE PERSONNEL COSTS 215,400 182,100 182,100 -15% MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 4,400 2,900 2,900 -34% ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 26,100 78,300 78,300 200% OPERATING EXPENDITURES 245,900 263,300 263,300 7% Highlights: • Current Assessor retires in July 2021. • Upon Council approval, the Assessor’s office will be absorbed into Customer Service. City will pursue an agreement with Kent County who will begin five-year reassessment plan Page 52

EXHIBIT #2 Special Council Meeting - Budget Review of 06/01 and Item 06/02/2021 #2. City of Dover FY 2021 -2022 Proposed Budget With FY 22 – 26 Capital Improvement Program Page 53

Item #2. MAJOR FUND HIGHLIGHTS • General Fund • Water Fund • Wastewater Fund • Electric Fund Page 54

Item #2. MAJOR FUND HIGHLIGHTS Fee and Transfer Trends – Enterprise Funds Major Rate & Fee Trends Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Proposed WATER/WASTEWATER FUND 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 Water per 1,000 gal (Tier 1) $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.49 $2.66 Water per 1,000 gal (Tier 2) $3.11 $3.33 Water per 1,000 gal (Outside City Tier 1) $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $3.74 $4.00 Water per 1,000 gal (Outside City Tier 2) $4.67 $5.00 Water Customer Charge $1.25 $1.25 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $5.00 $5.00 Wastewater per 1,000 gal. Charge $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.65 $2.84 $3.03 Wastewater per 1,000 gal (Outside City) $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $3.98 $4.25 $4.55 Wastewater Customer Charge $1.25 $1.25 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $5.00 $5.00 Kent County Sewer Treatment Fee - Rate set by County $2.34 $2.34 $2.34 $2.34 $2.34 $2.34 $2.34 $2.58 $2.58 $2.58 Kent County Sewer Adjustment (I & I flows) $1.05 $1.05 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.61 $1.72 ELECTRIC FUND Residential Rates $0.1316 $0.1204 $0.1204 $0.1203 $0.1203 $0.1203 $0.1206 $0.1206 $0.1209 $0.1209 Increase % -3.5% -8.5% 0.0% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% Power Cost Adjustment ($0.00252) ($0.00855) ($0.00382) ($0.00382) ($0.00700) ($0.00700) Electric Fund Customer Charge $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $7.50 $7.50 $7.50 $8.46 $8.46 $9.42 $9.42 Reconnect Fees $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 $50 - $100 Return Check Fees $25 $25 $25 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 Page 55

Item #2. Planning for the future Utility rate studies Page 56

Item #2. WATER UTILITY FUND BUDGET REVIEW Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Presented June 2, 2021 Page 57

Item #2. • Water Utility Fund Public Safety, General & Community Services Water Engineering * Water Maintenance * Water Treatment Plant * Capital Improvements Page 58

Item #2. Water Fund Operations • Accomplishments in FY21 • Bulk Water Station fully operational • Completion of Water Treatment Plant Improvements • Initial Assessment of Elevated Water Storage Tanks. • Water Master Plan Update. • Completed West Street, West Alley, and Ross Street. • Initiated a long-term Elevated Water Storage Tank Maintenance Contract Page 59

Item #2. Water Fund Operations • Goals planned in FY22 • Improve resiliency at WTP with the purchase of mobile generator • Water Main Replacement –Wellhead Redevelopment of four (4) deep wells. • Begin implementation of backflow testing as required by DNREC. • Develop public relations plan to educate public and City staff about environmental mandates • Continue to work with Tyler / MUNIS for Integration and utility billing. ❖ NW Water Tower – Earmark request Page 60

Item #2. Water Fund Budget - Revenue • Revenue overall flat compared over FY21 Original Budget $25,000 (0.3%) • Rate increase offset by reduced impact • Major increases/(decreases) affecting revenues • Water Service fees $$122,100 (2.0%) due to rate increase, but tempered buy low usage • Decrease in Impact Fees $ 150,000 (26.3%) ( based on trends Page 61

Item #2. Water Fund Budget - Expenses • Major increases/(decreases) affecting expenses • Increase in Water Treatment Plant expenses due to new equipment $$148,100. • Increase of 78,800 (69.6%) in Retiree Healthcare and $58,000 (20.4%) pension expenses due to splitting out Water and Wastewater funds • Capital Project Appropriation increase $286,700 (22.1%) • Decrease in Water Impact Reserve Fund of $285,100 • Decrease in Engineering and Inspections contractual services for the Water Master Plan Update completed last year $104,200 net (26%) Page 62

Item #2. Planning for the future - Water • Goals planned in FY22 • Improve resiliency at WTP with the purchase of mobile generator • Water Main Replacement –Wellhead Redevelopment of four (4) deep wells. • Begin implementation of backflow testing as required by DNREC. • Develop public relations plan to educate public and City staff about environmental mandates • Continue to work with Tyler / Mu for Integration and utility billing. Page 63

Item #2. WASTEWATER UTILTY FUND BUDGET REVIEW Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Presented June 2, 2021 Page 64

Item #2. • Wastewater Utility Fund Wastewater Engineering * Wastewater Maintenance * Capital Improvements Page 65

Item #2. Water Fund Operations • Accomplishments in FY21 • Completed studies for Turnberry, College Road and Lepore Road projects for FY22 implementation. • Replacement of Camera Truck Equipment. • Upgraded SCADA Equipment for Pump Stations. • Completion of Pump Station upgrade of #7 Pump Station Upgrades. • Completion of Kent County upgrade of US13 force main reduces stress on Pump Station #7 Page 66

Item #2. Wastewater Fund Operations • Goals planned in FY22 • Begin City Wide Inflow and Infiltration Investigation – 2 year project. • Lepore Road Sanitary Sewer Upgrade. • Turnberry Pump Station Upgrade and College Road Pump Station Replacement. • Meeting House Branch Sanitary Sewer Replacement • Transfer mobile generator from Water Utility to Pump Station #7. • Continue to work with Tyler / MUNIS for Integration. Page 67

Item #2. Wastewater Budget - Revenue • Starting Fund balance increase over FY21 Budget $1.62M • Decrease in transfers and expenses of $271,100 or -3.7% compared to FY21 Budget • Major increases/(decreases) ) affecting revenues • Wastewater Service Fees $242,000 (5.4%) due to rate increase • Groundwater Inflow Adjustment Revenue increase of $198,500 (10.8%) due to rate increase (7.1%). Page 68

Item #2. Wastewater Budget - Expenses • Major increases/(decreases) affecting expenses • Increase of 11,500 (14.1%) in Retiree Healthcare. • Capital Project Appropriation decrease of $339,000 (33.4%) Page 69

Item #2. Planning for the future - Wastewater • Goals planned in FY22 • Implementation of cost of service rates and modeling • Presented to City Council in January 2020 • Implementation continues in this Budget • Customer Service enhancements • Roll out of new billing system with Tyler / MUNIS • Continue inflow & infiltration improvements with relining program and sewer main replacements • Capacity improvements • Continuation of pump station replacements and upgrades • Technology updates to SCADA equipment and systems Page 70

Item #2. ELECTRIC FUND BUDGET REVIEW Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Presented June 2, 2021 Page 71

Item #2. • Electric Utility Fund Electric Administration * Engineering * Transmission & Distribution * Power Plant Operations * Power Supply * System Operations * Meter Reading Page 72

Item #2. Electric Fund Budget - Summary • Revenue decreased v. FY20 Original Budget-to-Budget (BTB) - $830K Million (-1.0%) before Rate Stabilization transfer in of $2.8 Million • No planned rate changes, PCA Credit remains $.0070/kwh • Implementing the cost of service model in FY21 reduced most business and commercial bills • Overall the utility is in excellent financial condition with adequate reserves • Decrease in Power Supply and Plant Operations costs offset by decrease in capacity credits budget to budget (McKee closure). • Major capital expenditures to be financed or paid from targeted reserves Page 73

Item #2. Electric Fund Budget - Summary • Major increases/(decreases) affecting revenues • Customer sales decrease $2,269,000 (-2.7%) due to rate reductions • Major increases/(decreases) affecting expenses • Power Supply cost decrease of $5.4 M budegte to budget (56%) • Estimated FY21 v Budget FY22 shows decrease of $3.0M • Actual capacity credits offset by reduced operation costs; net result, loss of McKee will not impact power supply costs • Operation costs decreased with closing of McKee ($2.5M) • Would be even lower except costs to run Van Sant are not known yet – RFP pending • Capital expenditures increased from $6.2M to $21.7 • $7M will be financed for the Garrison Oak Substation • $9M from Depreciation Reserve for decommissioning of the McKee Power Plant – set aside from utility fees for this exact purpose Page 74

Item #2. Electric Fund Budget - Summary • Major increases/(decreases) affecting revenues • Customer sales decrease $2,269,000 (-2.7%) due to rate reductions • Transfers to other accounts as follows • Transfer to Rate Stabilization Reserve $2.0 million • Transfer to Improvement & Extension Reserve of $3.7 million • Transfer to General Fund of $11 million (approximately the same % of total revenue as FY15 first year of $10M transfer Page 75

Item #2. Electric Debt Coverage Page 76

Item #2. Electric Fund Operations • Accomplishments in FY21 • Restored power (with help from other cities and contractors) to 8,200 customers in 4 days after EF1 tornado on August 4. • Signed Renewable Energy Purchased Power Agreement (PPA). • 50MW dedicated to the City of Dover • Includes Solar Renewable Energy Credits which have recently tripled in value • Market competitive energy costs plus capacity credits in PJM • Completed Phase 1 implementation of LED streetlight installation (before close of FY21). • Downtown installation • City-wide installation to be done in-house • Developed specifications for Garrison Oak substation. Page 77

Item #2. Electric Fund Operations • Accomplishments planned in FY22 • Provide a more customer centric approach to our business model with outreach and programs geared toward energy efficiency and large customers. • Renewable energy RFP. Recommendation to increase renewable energy resources. • Complete conversion of Electric GIS information into ACR-GIS (ESRI product) from ARC-FM (not ESRI). • Phase 1 and 2 (engineering, environmental) of the McKee #3 decommissioning budgeted at $1 million. • Build Garrison Oak Substation. • Integration of new billing system with Tyler Munis. • Enter into an agreement to run Van Sant for 6 six year (projected life span). Page 78

Item #2. Planning for the Future • Integrated Resource Plan • Energy Generation/Purchase • Unit 3 McKee to go out of service May 31, 2021 • 50 MW Solar Farm ~ Dec – Jun 2022 • Future Capacity • Solar PPA includes some capacity • Evaluating options with TEA, customers and system • Enhancements Substations • Garrison Oak Business & Technical Park RFP in FY21 • DAFB Replacement & Consolidation • Improved Operations • Technology • LED street lights • Advance Metering Infrastructure (AMI) • Better partnerships with DAFB and large volume customers Page 79

Item #2. Planning for the Future Yearly Percent of Runs in the Market for sale of Energy Page 80

EXHIBIT #3 Special Council Meeting - Budget Review of 06/01 and 06/02/2021 Item #2. Available to spend $ 653,000 Spending Additional Description Department Staff Cuts Council cuts approved approved $ (765,000.00) $ (1,749,100.00) $ 786,000 No Property Tax Increase $ 352,000 3% (v. 2,5%) NB raise $ 50,000 Moving Expense City Manager $ 20,000 Legal Expenses City Manager 50,000 Special Projects HR 50,000 25% Economic Development Mayor 25,000 Delete van replacement Recreation 31,000 Delete 2 FTE Customer Service $ 97,800 LAN Analyst deleted IT 37,500 Subtotal Admin/Rec $ 248,800.00 Reduce inc to Fire Fire 1,000 50% buffer for Ambulance Contract Life Safety 10,000 Knox Box Update Life Safety 23,200 2 Trucks Code Enforcement 50,300 40% cut Demolition Code Enforcement 100,000 Defer hiring 4 officers 6 mos Police 199,000 OT and Ed Asst Police 75,000 Tahoe Police 62,600 Subtotal Public Safety $ 322,100.00 Remote Access Facilities Maint. 25,000 City Hall Improvements Facilities Maint. 50,000 Craftsperson (2nd additional) Facilities Maint. 59,000 Craftsperson defer 6 mos Facilities Maint. 29,500 Warehouse Improvements Procurement & Inv 90,000 River Road (MLK - US13) Streets 380,000 Townshend (US13 - End) Streets 421,500 Kent Ave N Alley Streets 7,500 Kent Ave S Alley Streets 9,000 Asphalt Hot Box Streets 43,000 Replace 2000 Backhoe Streets 125,000 Replace2001 Dump Truck Streets 156,000 Cyclomedia Software Streets 48,000 Replace Automated Truck Sanitation 290,400 Replace Vac Truck Stormwater 364,000 Mirror Lake Drainage Basin Stormwater 350,000 Reduce Mulch Process Costs Stormwater 44,800 Subtotal Public Works/City Buildings $ 1,943,200.00 Page 81

Item #3. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING A Special City Council Meeting was held on June 14, 2021 at 5:32 p.m. with Council President Sudler presiding. Members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Neil, Mr. Hare, Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Rocha (arrived at 5:36 p.m.), Mr. Taylor (arrived at 5:40 p.m.), and Mr. Lindell. Mayor Christiansen was also present. Council staff members present were Mr. Rodriguez and Mrs. McDowell. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Anderson moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. Mr. Neil moved to recess into Executive Session pursuant to 29 Del. C. § 10004(b)(6) - Discussion of the content of documents, excluded from the definition of "public record" in § 10002 of this title where such discussion may disclose the contents of such documents ( §10002(1)(1) - any personnel, medical or pupil file, the disclosure of which would constitute an invasion of personal privacy, under this legislation or under any State or federal law as it relates to personal privacy) and pursuant to 29 Del. C. § 10004 (b )(9) - Personnel matters in which the names, competency and abilities of individual employees are discussed, unless the employee requests that such a meeting be open. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. The Special Council Meeting recessed into Executive Session at 5:33 p.m. The Executive Session adjourned at 7:06 p.m. ACTION RESULTING FROM THE EXECUTIVE SESSION Appointment of Interim City Manager During the executive session, members of Council considered the appointment of an interim or acting City Manager as the result of Mr. Randy Robertson’s departure. Mr. Neil moved to appoint Mr. Matthew Harline as the Interim City Manager effective June 1, 2021 with a 5% pay increase to continue until a new City Manager is in place. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Posting of City Clerk’s Position Mr. Boggerty moved to publicly advertise the City Clerk’s position. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment, seconded by Mrs. Arndt and unanimously carried. Page 82

Item #3. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 2 The Special Council Meeting adjourned at 7:16 p.m. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All ordinances, resolutions, motions, and orders adopted by City Council during their Special Meeting of June 14, 2021 are hereby approved. ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /TM S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Council-Minutes\2021\06-14-2021 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - ES ACTION (PUBLIC) - Personnel Matters.wpd Page 83

Item #4. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING The Regular City Council Meeting was held by video conference on June 14, 2021 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Sudler presiding. Council members present via video or telephone were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Boggerty (arrived at 7:37 p.m.), Mr. Neil, Mr. Hare, Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Rocha (arrived at 7:35 p.m.), Mr. Taylor (arrived at 7:50 p.m.) and Mr. Lindell. Staff members present via video or telephone were Police Chief Johnson, Ms. Peddicord, Mr. Harline, Mr. Hugg, Mr. Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Mayor Christiansen was also present. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Mayor Christiansen. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilperson Arndt. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mrs. Arndt and unanimously carried. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All Consent Agenda items are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. Mr. Hare moved for adoption of the consent agenda, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). PUBLIC HEARING - ELECTRIC FUND BUDGET A public hearing on the Electric Fund Budget is required for compliance with City of Dover Electric Revenue Bonds Resolutions prior to adoption of the budget. Notice of the public hearing was properly advertised for this time and place. Council President Sudler declared the public hearing open. There being no one present wishing to speak during the public hearing, Council President Sudler declared the public hearing closed. Council President Sudler noted that the First Reading of the Budget Ordinances would take place during the latter part of the meeting and that the Final Reading and adoption of the Ordinances were scheduled for the Regular Council meeting of June 28, 2021. ANNEXATION/REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 115 FOX HALL DRIVE, OWNED BY EDWARD C. AND JOAN N. LARRIVEE Mr. Dave Hugg, Director of Planning and Community Development, reviewed the Petition to Annex and Rezone property located at 115 Fox Hall Drive. The Planning Commission recommended the annexation of the property with the zoning designation of R-20 (One Family Residence), as submitted. Page 84

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 2 Public Hearing - Zoning Classification Members considered a request for the rezoning of property proposed for annexation located at 115 Fox Hall Drive, consisting of 1.131+/- acres, owned by Edward C. and Joan N. Larrivee. The property is currently zoned RS-1 - Residential Single Family (Kent County zoning classification) and the proposed zoning is R-20 - One-Family Residence (City of Dover zoning classification). A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider the rezoning of property located at 115 Fox Hall Drive, owned by Edward C. and Joan N. Larrivee. Council President Sudler declared the public hearing open. There being no one present wishing to speak, Council President Sudler declared the public hearing closed. Adoption of Annexation Resolution No. 2021-18 Members considered Annexation Resolution No. 2021-18 for property located at 115 Fox Hall Drive, owned by Edward C. And Joan N. Larrivee. By motion of Mr. Neil, seconded by Mr. Hare, Council, by a unanimous roll call vote (Taylor absent), adopted Resolution No. 2021-18, as follows: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INCLUSION OF AN AREA WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF DOVER. WHEREAS, the Charter of the City of Dover authorizes Council to extend the boundaries of the said City in accordance with Title 22, Chapter 1, Section 101 of the Delaware Code (22 Del.C.§ 101); and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council deem it to be in the best interest of the City of Dover to include an area contiguous to the present City limits, and hereinafter more particularly described, within the limits of the City of Dover; and WHEREAS, the Charter of the City of Dover provides that if an annexation is petitioned by all owners of all property considered for annexation, no election shall be required. For an annexation petition not requiring an election, such petition shall be processed in accordance with procedures established for amendments to the zoning map, specified in Dover Code, Appendix B - Zoning. All annexation petitions shall be processed concurrently with the rezoning of the property considered for annexation and shall be subject to public hearing before City Council. Public notice shall be completed in accordance with the provisions of the Dover Code relating to amendment of the zoning map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 1. That the following described area, situated in East Dover Hundred, Kent County, State of Delaware, along with all adjacent paths, sidewalks, roadways, and rights-of-way in their entirety, shall be annexed to and included within the limits of the City of Dover: Page 85

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 3 All that certain lot, piece or parcel of land situated in East Dover Hundred, Kent County, State of Delaware, lying on the northerly side of Fox Hall Drive, being bounded as follows; on the North by lands now or late of Joe W. and Georgianna Burden, on the East by lands now or late of Samuel M. and Nancy H. S. Magrone, on the South by Fox Hall Drive (50 feet wide), on the West by lands of unknown ownership, as shown on a plan prepared by McClure Associates, Inc., dated 11/24/97, file#MA:11-23-97, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a found iron pipe in the northerly line of Fox Hall Drive, a corner for this lot and for said lands of Magrone, said beginning point located 1585.1 feet, as measured in a westerly direction, along the northerly line of Fox Hall Drive from its intersection with the westerly line of County Road #104; thence from said point of beginning the following four (4) courses and distances: (1) along the northerly line of Fox Hall Drive, South 68 degrees 40 minutes West a distance of 200 feet to a found iron pipe in line of said lands of unknown ownership, (2) thence with the same, North 31 degrees 32 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 190.59 feet to a found iron pin in line of said lands of Burden, (3) thence with the same, North 51 degrees 16 minutes East a distance of 245 feet to a found iron pipe in line of said lands of Burden, a corner for said lands of Magrone, (4) thence with the same, South 21 degrees 20 minutes East a distance of 260.84 feet to a point, the point of beginning. Containing within said metes and bounds 1.131 acres of land, more or less. Said lot being known as 115 Fox Hall Drive. 2. That the above described property shall be annexed into the City of Dover with a zoning classification as set by City Council and in accordance with the zoning map and environs then in force, effective upon such lands being included within the limits of the City of Dover. 3. That the certified copy of this resolution of annexation, together with a plot of the area annexed, shall be filed for record with the Recorder of Deeds of Kent County. 4. That the effective date of this resolution shall be the 15th day of June, 2021 at 12:01 a.m. ADOPTED: JUNE 14, 2021 Final Reading/Adoption of Rezoning Ordinance #2021-08 Members considered Ordinance #2021-08 rezoning property located at 115 Fox Hall Drive, owned by Edward C. And Joan N. Larrivee. Mr. Neil moved that the Final Reading of Ordinance #2021-08 be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mrs. Arndt and carried by unanimous roll call vote (Taylor absent). (The First Reading of the ordinance was accomplished during the Council meeting of April 12, 2021.) Mr. Neil moved for approval of the rezoning, as recommended by the Planning Commission. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and, by a unanimous roll call vote, Council adopted Ordinance #2021-08, as follows: Page 86

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 115 FOX HALL DRIVE WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within the limits of the City of Dover; and WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of zoning and planning to change the permitted use of property described below from RS-1 Residential Single Family (Kent County zoning classification) to R-20 - One Family Residence Zone (City of Dover zoning classification). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 1) That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance of the City of Dover have been amended by changing the zoning designation from RS-1 - Residential Single Family (Kent County zoning classification) to R-20 - One Family Residence Zone (City of Dover zoning classification) on that property located at 115 Fox Hall Drive, consisting of 1.131+/- acres, owned by Edward C. and Joan N. Larrivee. (Tax Parcel: ED-00-076.05-01-01.00-000; Planning Reference: AX–21-02; Council District: 1) ADOPTED: JUNE 14, 2021 PUBLIC HEARING/BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS EXEMPTION REPORT - MAY 19, 2021 - INNUS PARKER - 239 GRINDING WHEEL DRIVE Mrs. Cheryl Bundek, City Assessor, provided background information regarding the appeal of the denial of the request for a Disabled Citizen Reduction for Ms. Innus Parker, 239 Grinding Wheel Drive. Mrs. Bundek advised that Ms. Parker’s request was denied because she was not able to submit an award letter from the Social Security Administration stating that she is currently receiving disability benefits. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Bundek stated that Ms. Parker did supply long-term disability documents through Verizon and it states that she must go to the Social Security Administration. Responding to Mr. Neil, Mrs. Bundek advised that if Ms. Parker were to provide the award letter from the Social Security Administration, they would be able to give her the exemption for this year. She noted that normally their deadline is May 31st, but they allow for some seniors and those who are disabled to submit as long as it is before the City does their calculations, which would not be until after the Council meeting of June 28th. Once they do the tax calculations, then it becomes adjustments and refunds. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Mrs. Bundek stated that they do the exemptions based on a yearly tax bill, so if Ms. Parker were to qualify by July 10th, if Council would allow it, they can go back to the July 1st billing, but they would not go retroactive for years. Page 87

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 5 Mr. Taylor disclosed that Ms. Parker is a family member of his and he would not be voting on this item. Mr. Rocha disclosed that he had been in communication with Ms. Parker. He noted that in her current situation, Kent County does waive or give a discount for tax purposes without social security. He stated that the City’s ordinance has social security written in it, but that it might be an item they could review. Council President Sudler declared the public hearing open. Ms. Innus Parker, 239 Grinding Wheel Drive, advised that she has been on long-term disability since 2008. She asked if Council would reconsider a clause for allowing her to get the deduction based on her current health situation. Ms. Parker noted that she has documentation from her primary care physician that states she is disabled. Mr. Rocha asked if they made a change to the ordinance, what type of impact would it have as far as the City’s tax base for defendants that are in Ms. Parker’s condition. Mrs. Bundek stated that they could contact Kent County and get a list of all of their applicants, but she was not sure if they put them in a category on why they are disabled. Mr. Rocha stated that he did not realize that Kent County gave discounts to anyone less than 100%. Mrs. Bundek noted that she believed the person could have a doctor’s note saying they were a 100% disabled and have a veteran’s disability. Responding to Mrs. Arndt, Ms. Parker stated that her hearing with Social Security was scheduled for the following afternoon. Ms. Parker noted that Social Security usually sends out a letter, but did not think that they would tell her right away because it is with a judge. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mrs. Bundek stated that every year the citizens have to come in and provide an updated award letter or they will not be approved. She noted that as long as it is an award letter from Social Security, they would be approved. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mrs. Bundek stated that they could hold off, pending the result of the hearing. She advised that if Council would direct her to wait and if Ms. Parker receives the letter by a certain date they can make an adjustment to her tax bill. It is usually about $200 depending on what the tax rate is and it takes $50,000 off the value of her home. She noted that if Ms. Parker makes the payment, if it does not happen before July 31st, they can make the refund as long as Council directs it. Mr. Lindell moved to delay the consideration for a month until they receive that letter. The motion failed for the lack of a second. Mrs. Bundek asked for clarification that if Ms. Parker did not provide the award letter, then it would be denied and would not be brought up until next year. Mr. Lindell stated that if Ms. Parker gets the letter they could handle it at another meeting. Mrs. Bundek stated that if Council wants it to come back to another meeting, she would not be available after the next meeting in June. Page 88

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 6 Mr. Neil suggested that the motion be for sending it back for six months until January 1, 2022. Mr. Hare stated that they did not need to go back on the item and to give it to Ms. Parker. He stated that if she does not have the letter by January 1st, then they have to revisit it. There being no one else present wishing to speak, Council President Sudler declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Neil moved to the delay the decision until January 1, 2022 on the case to permit the receipt of a social security decision. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lindell. Mr. Anderson stated that if Ms. Parker does not get the letter by January 31st, then she will get a tax bill, but if she provides that letter, then they will make an adjustment and give a refund. Mr. Neil moved to the delay the decision until January 1, 2022 on the case to permit the receipt of a social security decision. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lindell and carried with Mr. Taylor abstaining. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 10, 2021 The Minutes of the Special Council Meeting of May 10, 2021 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Hare, seconded by Mr. Neil and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen . ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 24, 2021 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of May 24, 2021 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Hare, seconded by Mr. Neil and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 7, 2021 The Minutes of the Special Council Meeting of June 7, 2021 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Hare, seconded by Mr. Neil and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS - MAY 19, 2021 The Board of Assessment Appeals was brought to order at 9:00 AM, by Chairman William Garfinkel. Board Members present were: Chairman William Garfinkel, Board Members Tom Burns, Todd Stonesifer, John Davis as well as City Deputy Solicitor Gary E. Junge. Staff present were City Assessor Cheryl A. Bundek, Customer Service Director Patricia Marney and Administrative Assistant Annette Hart. Agenda Additions/Deletions By unanimous vote, the agenda was approved as presented. Page 89

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 7 Adoption of Consent Agenda Central Delaware Habitat for Humanity Locations: 133 S Queen St & 127 S Queens Mr. Stonesifer moved to adopt the consent agenda which was seconded by Mr. Burns. Motion carried 4-0 Farm Land Exemptions Farm Lands LP Locations: Exempt Request: 43 AC Wyoming Mill Road $995,900 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS A request for farmland exemption was submitted to the Assessor's Office. The property was purchased October 15, 2013 and is currently used to grow vegetables. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend that the request for exemption be reviewed. Representing Farm Lands LP was McKenzie Peet. Ms. Peet told the board that her clients are currently taxed on the farm land on Wyoming Mill Road and are asking for a farmland exemption. She provided pictures showing that the land is currently farmed. The Assessor pointed out that another piece of property located within the City of Dover city limits and owned by Fam Land LP was already classified as tax exempt. After being asked by Mr. Stonesifer what the staff recommendation is, Mrs. Bundek explained that the land falls within the guidelines of Farmland and should therefore be approved. Mr. Junge was asked by Chairman Garfinkel what his legal opinion was. Mr. Junge said that he sees no issue with the application since the land was farmed. Mr. Burns questioned why this piece of land currently taxed and not exempt? Mrs. Bundek explained that the owner had not applied for an exemption with the City until now and was also currently taxed by the county, even though the company had owned this parcel since 2013. Mrs. Bundek also pointed out that the exemption Page 90

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 8 should be retro-active to July 2020. Mr. Burns made the motion to approve the exemption to be retro-active to 2020. Mr. Stonesifer seconded the motions. Motion carried 4-0 Mrs. Bundek informed the appellant, that the City Council has the final decision and that a letter with the date of the Council Hearing would be mailed. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Board of Assessment Appeals’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). Exempt Requests Central Delaware Housing Collaborative Locations: Exempt Request 731 W Division Street $ 112,000 801 W Division Street $ 296,200 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS An exemption request for the above referenced properties was submitted to the Assessor's Office. Both properties were purchased August 2019 and will be used as a Woman's Homeless Shelter. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend that the request for exemption be reviewed. Present for the hearing were Ms. Bradshaw, Chair and Mr. Merchant, Director. Ms. Bradshaw started by telling the board that the Central Delaware Housing Collaborative was an initiative started by the Mayors Blue Ribbon committee to end the homelessness in the City of Dover. The organization wanted to help homeless woman without children, because Dover already had two existing homeless shelters for woman with children. The organization acquired the property located at 801 W Division Street and opened its doors to homeless woman in 2020. The goal of the organization is to prepare the woman for permanent housing, as some Page 91

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 9 can leave the shelter and move into permanent housing, others are not and are then transitioned form the shelter into the transition home located at 731 W Division Street and then into permanent housing. Chairman Garfinkel asked what the properties were used for in the past. Mr. Merchant explained that they were owned by an organization called "Aid in Dover" and were used as a shelter for youth. The Assessor told the board that the property used to be exempt from property taxes but were put back on the tax roll during the Exemption Audit because they were no longer occupied. Mr. Junge asked when the organization was formed? Ms. Bradshaw explained that it was formed in 2018 and was started by the Mayors initiative to end the homelessness in Dover. Mr. Burns was wondering how many women were able to be housed by the shelter. Mr. Bradshaw said that the shelter can house 16 women but due to COVID restriction there were currently only 10 women in the shelter. Mr. Merchant explained that the women remain under case management for a year after they leave the shelter. Mr. Junge explained that the organization falls under a charitable organization, which means that it is optional for the Board to grant the exemption. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to approve both properties for the exemption. Mr. Burns seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-0. Mrs. Bundek informed the appellant, that the City Council has the final decision and that a letter with the date of the Council Hearing would be mailed. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Board of Assessment Appeals’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). Page 92

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 10 St. Nicholas Ukrainian Orthodox Church Location Exempt Request 870 Forest Street $699,700 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS An exemption request was submitted to the Assessor's Office. This property was purchased by the Church in November of 2017. Per the application, this is the only Orthodox Church in Kent County and is also home to the only Gambler's Anonymous Group outside of New Castle County. If this exemption is approved, it is requested that the exemption be retro-active to July 2020 billing. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend that the request for exemption be reviewed. Father Steven Hutnick, pastor at St. Nicholas Ukrainian Orthodox Church was present for the hearing. He told the board that the church purchased the property in 2017. He also mentioned that the church is home to the only Gamblers' Anonymous Group outside New Castle County. Father Hutnick said that due to the pandemic the church has not been able to have any fundraisers. Mrs. Bundek advised the board that this exempt request would also be retro-active to the tax billing of 2020. Mr. Stonesifer pointed out that there are two buildings on the property and asked what the building in the back of the property was used for? Father Hutnick told the board that the building is currently vacant but had been used as a daycare in the past. He pointed out that the church was currently looking to rent the building out to another daycare provider for approximately $3000 a month. Mr. Hutnick explained that the building in the back of the property was separate from the church and that he was only requesting the exemption for the church. The Assessor pointed out that the two buildings were located on one parcel. Chairman Garfinkel asked the board members if they should request the financial statements from the church to make sure they were not making a profit on the future rental property. Mr. Junge believes that the portion of the property used for income should not be exempt. Page 93

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 11 Mr. Stonesifer agreed, he pointed out that the board had similar cases come before them and they had decided that in such cases the portion of the property generating income would not be exempt from property taxes. The board agreed unanimously that the percentage of the building generating income needed to be separated from the church. When asked by the board members what the best way would be to divide the two parcels, Mrs. Bundek said that she could take the portion of the building and part of the land around the building and create a separate parcel for taxing purposes. This would be done after the hearing, at which time she would notify the board with the taxable square footage of the broken-out portion of the property. Mr. Junge was concerned and suggested for the appellant to get an appraisal done that would show the values of the parcel split, because the City may not be able to defend the new values if this was done by the Assessor, should this go to court. Father Hutnick assured that the church would not take this matter to the courts. He asked the board to come up with a fair solution. Mrs. Bundek was concerned about the time it would take for the appellant to get an appraisal done. Chairman Garfinkel proposed to keep the hearing open until an appraisal can be provided. Father Hutnick mentioned that both the church and the daycare would be using the parking lot. Mr. Stonesifer explained that those concerns would be addressed by the appraisal. Mrs. Bundek told the board that the appraisal should only consist of the break down of the property and not the value, since the city has already assessed the property. Mr. Stonesifer disagreed, in his opinion the appraisal should include the appraised amount for the buildings. The Assessor suggested breaking out the building only because the church also uses the parking lot as mentioned by the Father. Chairman Garfinkel asked Mrs. Bundek if she could break out the building and the land. Page 94

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 12 Mrs. Bundek explained that the software would allow her to create a separate parcel for tax purposes only. Father Hutnick agreed with the way the Assessor proposed to calculate the taxes for the daycare. Mr. Stonesifer moved to tax the square footage of the daycare and the land beneath it and for the rest of the property to be exempt based on the Assessor's calculations to be retro-active to the tax year 2020. Mr. Burns seconded the motion. Mrs. Bundek informed the appellant, that the City Council has the final decision and that a certified letter with the date of the Council Hearing would be mailed. Motion carried 4-0. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Board of Assessment Appeals’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). Bayhealth Medical Center Inc. Location Exempt Request 30 Old Rudnick Road $1,969,700 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS An exemption request was submitted to the Assessor's Office This property was purchased in November 2019 and is being used by Bayheatlh's internal billing, finance and administrative staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend that the request for exemption be reviewed. Mr. Tretina, Chief Financial Officer for Bayhealth Medical Center Inc. was present for the hearing. He told the board that this building was used for internal billing, finance and administrative purposes. He explained that the organization was exempt from Federal Income Tax under section 501( c ) 3 of the internal Revenue Service. Mr. Burns recused himself from voting on this exempt request. Page 95

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 13 Mr. Garfinkel asked the Assessor what her recommendations were? The Assessor said that since the building is used by the Bayhealth organization and was not rented to any other organization, she would recommend the exemption be approved. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to approve the exemption which was seconded by Mr. Davis. Mrs. Bundek informed the appellant, that the City Council has the final decision and that a certified letter with the date of the Council Hearing would be mailed. Motion carried 3-0 By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Board of Assessment Appeals’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). Delaware State University Foundation Location Exempt Request 225 Walker Road $578,600 Walker Road $ 4,900 Walker Road $ 800 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS An exemption request was submitted to the Assessor's Office. These properties were purchased on March 01, 2021 by the Delaware State University Foundation and will be used as the Presidents House and Conference Center for the University. Richard Forsten, Attorney and Henrietta Savage, controller were present for the hearing. Mr. Forsten started by telling the board that the current President's House for the University needed renovation, therefore, the University purchased the property located at 225 Walker Road, which consists of 3 parcels all together. Two of the parcels are slivers of land located along side of the driveway leading up to the house. The University uses the first floor of the current President's house for seminars, meetings, fund raising and is using the second floor as the President's residence. The plan for the new President's house at 225 Walker Road is to be the same. Mr. Davis explained that the two small parcels were part of the drive way which was also leading to two other residence. Page 96

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 14 Mr. Stonesifer asked if the organization was going to charge the other properties any maintenance fees. Mr. Forsten said that the organization was not planning on charging a fee, due to the staff and time it would take to bill the fees. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to approve the exempt request, which was seconded by Mr. Davis. Chairman Garfinkle asked what the relationship was between the two organization. Ms. Savage explained that Del State University owns Delaware State University Foundation and that the Delaware State University Foundation was used to raise funds for the University. She told that board that the property was paid for by the Foundation through donations. Motion carried 4-0 By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Board of Assessment Appeals’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). Disabled Citizen Reduction Appeal Parker Innus Location Reduction Request 239 Grinding Wheel Road $50,000 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS An appeal was submitted to the Assessor's Office. Ms. Parker submitted application to be considered for the "Disabled Citizen Tax Reduction". Her request was denied because Ms. Parker was not able to submit an "Award Letter" from the Social Security Office, stating that she is currently receiving disability benefits, as requested on the "Disabled Citizen Property Tax Reduction Form" provided by the City of Dover Assessor's Office and per our City ordinance (Sec 102-184). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend that the request for exemption be reviewed. Mr. Parker was present for the hearing. She told the board that she has been on long term disability with her previous employer and is no longer able to work. Page 97

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 15 The appellant explained that in her opinion the disability requirement for Long Term Disability mirror the requirement for Social Security disability. She explained that she went though a series of doctor's exams and evaluations to be awarded Long Term Disability. Ms. Parker asked why people that are not listed disabled through the Social Security Administration were not able to receive the property tax reduction. She told the board that she was able to get the disability reduction with the county and asked if the board would be willing to give her the reduction for the City of Dover taxes with the Long-Term Disability she was receiving. Chairman Garfinkel asked Ms. Parker if she had applied for disability through Social Security, she told him that she was scheduled for a hearing in June. Chairman Garfinkel asked if she had ever received an award letter from the Social Security Administration. Mr. Parker told him that she had not received an award letter from the Social Security Administration but does have a note from her doctor. Chairman Garfinkel pointed out that the city code requires an award letter from the Social Security Administration to be able to receive the reduction. He pointed out that only City Council can approve changes to the city code after Ms. Parker asked whom she should talk to get the requirement changed and to present her case. Chairman Garfinkel suggested Ms. Parker start by meeting with the Chair for the Legislative & Finance Committee. Mrs. Bundek explained that in 2008 an Ad-Hoc committee was formed to look into a property tax reduction for the disabled, because the City was only granting reductions to Seniors. She told the board that the committee consisted of one councilman and several members of the community. This committee recommended to council that only citizens with a 100% disability through the Social Security Administration would be able to apply for the reduction. Mrs. Bundek told Ms. Parker that this was the reason she had not been able to qualify for the reduction, that her office must go by what the code states. She also explained that the county had different qualifications than the city. Mr. Junge agreed that the law is the law and that the Assessor's office had to go by what the law said. Ms. Parker explained that she was under the impression, that by coming before the Board of Assessment Appeals, she could appeal the Assessor's decision to deny her application. Page 98

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 16 Mrs. Bundek explained that going before the board would be her only way for her to appeal the Assessor's decision and that the board would make recommendations to Council. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to deny the appeal, which was seconded by Mr. Davis. Motion carried 4-0. Mrs. Bundek informed the appellant, that the City Council has the final decision and that a certified letter with the date of the Council Hearing would be mailed. The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 A.M. A Public Hearing was held at the beginning of the City Council meeting to consider the appeal of the denial of the request for a disabled citizen reduction at which time the decision was delayed until January 1, 2022 on the case to permit the receipt of a social security decision. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for acceptance of the Board of Assessment Appeals Report, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT - MAY 25, 2021 The Council Committee of the Whole Meeting was held by video conference on May 25, 2021 at 6:00 p.m., with Council President Sudler presiding. Members of Council present via video or telephone were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Neil, Mr. Boggerty, Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Rocha, Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Lindell. Mr. Hare was absent. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Ms. Maucher (Utility), Mr. Contant (arrived at 6:04 p.m.) and Mr. Shevock (Legislative, Finance, and Administration), and Mr. Shelton (Safety Advisory and Transportation). UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee met with Chairman Rocha presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Review of Water Utility/Wastewater Utility Fees for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Mr. Matt Harline, Assistant City Manager, reviewed the background and analysis for the Water Utility/Wastewater Utility Fees for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget. Staff recommended directing staff to include rate increases in FY 2021-22 Proposed Budget. Page 99

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 17 Responding to Mr. Neil, Mr. Harline stated that there were no ARP funds included in the utility accounts but that there may be an opportunity to use some of the funds for this if it could relate to clean drinking water and infrastructure improvements. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Mr. Lyon stated that there had been an emergency repair at Lincoln Park but the project was completed before the road was re-paved about two years ago. He stated that Water/Wastewater had repaired about two hundred feet of sewer pipe that had collapsed at that location. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Mr. Lyon stated that the Denny’s Road project had been budgeted in Fiscal Year 2021 and he believed the approximate cost was $3.2 to $3.4 million. He noted that they were considering a 1 million gallon tank to increase pressures in that area, as well as potential capacity for future development. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Mr. Lyon stated that the projects known as Stonebrook East and West were built and currently had capacity. Responding to Mr. Harline, Mr. Lyon stated that through the half point of the Fiscal Year, Dover had received two times as much rain as the previous year, which had caused a delta. He stated that the City could decrease the groundwater fee if it could get everything tightened up which would mean cheaper rates for constituents. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Utility Committee meeting, seconded by Mr. Taylor and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 6:31 p.m. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Chairman Anderson presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Taylor and unanimously carried. Evaluation of Bids - Fiscal Year 2021 Street and Alley Program Ms. Sharon Duca, Public Works Director, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the Fiscal Year 2021 Street and Alley Program. Staff recommended awarding the contract to Grassbuster’s Landscaping, for the City of Dover FY 2021 Street and Alley Program, Bid #21-0034PW, for the amount of $713,294. Responding to Mr. Neil, Ms. Duca stated that based on Public Work’s current Page 100

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 18 evaluation, the sections in question would not involve any tree work and Grassbuster’s Landscaping had done the 2019 street program and was qualified to do concrete and asphalt work. Responding to Mr. Shevock, Ms. Duca stated that Public Works had received seven bids in total for the project. She stated that some of the bids were close in range but there was a range of almost $300,000 between the bids overall. Responding to Councilwoman Arndt, Ms. Duca stated that the problem with North Bradford Street was that the trees were impacting the roadway in certain areas, so it would need a more detailed review to see if paving would impact a future design of North Bradford in regards to preserving the trees. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Duca stated that Public Works had not moved forward on any action with Conwell Street but that they could investigate the matter further to come up with a plan. She stated that Raymond Street was supposed to be extended as part of a proposed development which was being analyzed through that development for its dedication to the City. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Duca stated that she believed the development would be apartments and the proposed access is through Mishoe and Raymond Street. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Duca stated that she was referring to a new development behind Mishoe Towers. She stated that Raymond Street extended down to the railroad tracks and there was another road or paper street that extended north into the property in the back which is where access is planned. Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Ms. Duca stated that the procurement manager ensures that the invitation to bid is sent out to minority and women owned businesses. She stated that in terms of Dover business there was one bid but it was about $300,000 more than the low bid. Ms. Duca stated that the City does not ask for information regarding the diversity or makeup of a company. Mr. Anderson stated that minority businesses are able to submit that kind of information which would give them about a 3% preference in the bid. Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Ms. Duca stated that the incentive was included in the bid package. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Ms. Duca stated that in addition to looking at road ratings, Public Works was also doing road repairs following sewer main work. She stated that it would take approximately one year after that work had been done and settled to repair the roadway. Ms. Duca stated that they were also dealing with roads with extreme maintenance issues where the amount of material being used on maintenance made the road repair a priority. She stated that they would be Page 101

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 19 reevaluating the road ratings in the near future to view all roads as equal rather than based upon traffic that was involved on the roadway. Mrs. Arndt stated that both she and Mr. Neil had received concerns from constituents specific to the North Bradford project. She noted that the North Bradford Street residents were unaware of the tree removal project. Mrs. Arndt advised that the street scape project on South Bradford Street was well received due to the door to door interactions and workshop at the library to make the residents aware of which trees would be impacted. She suggested that a similar process be conducted for the North Bradford Street residents. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Duca stated that since the project came in under budget she would like to save some funds in case there was an overage, but they also have the ability, based on the way the bid and purchasing policy were written to increase it by 25% if they wanted to add additional streets. She stated that there was also the possibility that they would need some of the project to do some engineering design with some of the street program in the future. Ms. Duca stated that it would stay in holding for street related projects or needs. Mr. Sudler moved that Council instruct Ms. Duca to move forward with an investigation in regards to Conwell Street as to how to get the road repaired and/or to get it dedicated to the City through the County as soon as possible. The motion was seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committees’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation to award the contract to Grassbuster’s Landscaping, for the City of Dover FY 2021 Street and Alley Program. The motion was seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committees’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). Evaluation of Bids - North Bradford Street Tree Removal Ms. Sharon Duca, Public Works Director, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the evaluation of bids for the North Bradford Street Tree Removal. Staff recommended awarding the contract to Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC, for the City of Dover North Bradford Street Tree Removal, Bid #21-0035PW, for the amount of $122,015.80. Page 102

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 20 Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Ms. Duca stated that one of the big issues with this project was making the street ADA compliant. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Ms. Duca stated that the tree replacement was evaluated by City staff and there were six different species selected because of the amount of space available on Bradford Street between the curb and sidewalk. She advised that it was also proposed that they be planted with root deflectors to help them flourish in the future and avoid future issues with ADA compliance. Ms. Duca noted that the selected trees would be shown to the public as the options available for the tree replacements and would most likely be planted in the fall season because it was the best time for planting new trees to help them establish. Responding to Mr. Neil, Ms. Duca stated that the project could be delayed; however, they would need to determine how much longer the contractor that currently had the Fiscal Year 2020 street program would be able to maintain their prices. She advised that even if it was not within the time frame, projects could be rescheduled into a different year to allow more time for public input and possibly additional design. Mrs. Arndt moved to refer the North Bradford Street tree removal project back to staff for recommendations on public engagement and design improvements and move in line with the South Bradford Street project. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sudler and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committees’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). Review of General Fund Fees for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Mr. Matt Harline, Assistant City Manager, reviewed the background and analysis for the General Fund Fees for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget. Staff recommended directing Staff to include rate increases in the FY 2021-22 Proposed Budget. Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Harline stated that there were an average of 318 police false alarms within the City in Fiscal Year 2019-20. Mayor Christiansen asked that staff consider increasing the fines for malfunctioning and automatic fire alarms on behalf of the Fire Department. Responding to Mr. Contant, Mr. Harline stated that the projected shortfall for Fiscal year 2022 would be about $450,000. Responding to Mr. Contant, Mr. Harline stated that the City had never tried to make this a full enterprise fund before, meaning they had never set the rates at a level to cover all of the costs, which is what they were attempting now. He noted that the last Page 103

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 21 time the fees were increased were in Fiscal Year 2017-18. Mr. Harline advised that by 2023 the City would take in more money than the cost to provide the service. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Harline, referring to the Proposed Sanitation Rates, stated that the City could hold the fees for the 300 gallon service rather than lowering them and raising them again in the future. He advised that they were intentionally bringing the mobile home rate even with the residential rate. Ms. Duca stated that the largest cost overall was the tipping fee for the waste. She advised that parts of commercial services do not receive all of the same services as the residential. Ms. Duca explained that they were trying to get more equity in terms of the actual services received as well as the volume of waste received from different types of customers. Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation of the proposed sanitation rates except for the proposed decrease for Fiscal Year 2022 for the 300 gallon service rates, which should remain at the Fiscal Year 2021 rate. The motion was seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committees’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee meeting, seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:46 p.m. SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE The Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee met with Chairman Taylor presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. Request for Waiver - Appendix A - Subdivisions, Article VI - Subdivision - General Requirements and Design Standards, Section E - Lots (Lands of Fountainview, LLC at 100 Ridgely Street) - Waiver to Reduce Required Lot Frontage Width on a Public Street Associated with Minor Subdivision Plan to Subdivide Property Consisting of 7.3386 Acres into Two Parcels (Lot 1 and Lot 2) Mrs. Dawn Melson-Williams, Principal Planner, reviewed the Petition to Waive the Zoning Ordinance Provision: Reduction of Lot Frontage Width Requirement on a Page 104

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 22 Public Street Associated with Minor Subdivision Plan to Subdivide property consisting of 7.3386 acres into two parcels (Lot 1 and Lot 2) at 100 Ridgely Street, requested by Lands of Fountainview, LLC. Staff recommended approval of the Minor Subdivision Plan and approval of the Waiver Request to reduce the required lot frontage on a public street subject to conditions. Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committees’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). Review of Bike Friendly Community Status Mrs. Lisa Chase reviewed the application process for renewing the City of Dover’s Bronze Bike Friendly Community Status. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mrs. Chase stated that the City was looking to retain its Bronze status. She advised that it would be unrealistic to try to achieve Silver status at this time but that may be a possibility in four more years. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mrs. Chase stated that the cost to complete the application would be between $750 and $1,000. Mayor Christiansen stated that the application would be covered by the Parks and Recreation budget or the City Manager’s budget. Mr. Neil moved to cover the cost of the application for the bike-friendly community status from the Parks and Recreation budget up to $1,000. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committees’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote ( Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). Discussion - Update on a Mobile Command Centre and Substation Mayor Christiansen reviewed his research into other communities utilizing standing substations as well as mobile command posts. Chief Thomas Johnson reviewed the pilot plan for a mobile substation and the possibility of utilizing a 2001 Ford chassis based vehicle already owned by the department. Page 105

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 23 Mr. Neil stated that he felt the mobile substation would not need to have a large police sign on it due to the fact that it could be used for many things in addition to community policing. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Chief Johnson stated that the vehicle would have a police presence, probably more than one, at all times. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Chief Johnson stated that they envision a lot of options and different services would be provided by the mobile substation. Mr. Taylor shared photos of a building available for lease for a potential police substation. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting, seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Mr. Rocha moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Boggerty and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:38 p.m. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for acceptance of the Council Committee of the Whole Report, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). MONTHLY REPORTS - APRIL 2021 By motion of Mr. Hare, seconded by Mr. Neil, the following monthly reports were accepted by consent agenda: City Assessor’s Report City Council’s Community Enhancement Fund Report City Manager’s Report City Planner’s Report (March and April) Controller/Treasurer’s Budget Report Fire Chief’s Report (March and April) Police Chief’s Report APPOINTMENTS RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR CHRISTIANSEN - ELECTION BOARD - HEATHER D. ENNIS - THREE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE ON MAY 1, 2023 (TO FILL THE UNEXPIRED TERM OF JUANITA F. WALKER) Mayor Christiansen requested the appointment of Heather D. Ennis to the Election Board for a three- year term to expire May 1, 2023 (to fill the unexpired term of Juanita F. Walker). Page 106

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 24 By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the appointment, as recommended by Mayor Christiansen. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent). 2020/21 ANNUAL COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SUBCOMMITTEES - RECOMMENDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT SUDLER AND COMMITTEE CHAIRS (DEFERRED DURING THE ANNUAL MEETING OF MAY 10, 2021) By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the following appointments, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by unanimous roll vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent): Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Jonathan D. Contant (Recommended by Chairman Anderson) Daniel T. Shevock (Recommended by Council President Sudler) Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Dante Jones (Recommended by Chairman Boggerty) Michael W. Lewis (Recommended by Council President Sudler) Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Dana Shelton (Recommended by Council President Sudler) Utility Committee Jennifer L. Harris (Recommended by Chairman Rocha) LaVaughn McCutcheon (Recommended by Council President Sudler) APPOINTMENTS RECOMMENDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT SUDLER (DEFERRED DURING THE ANNUAL MEETING OF MAY 10, 2021 By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the following appointments, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by unanimous roll vote (Boggerty, Rocha, and Taylor absent): Downtown Dover Partnership Board of Directors Mayor Robin R. Christiansen Assistant City Manager, Matthew Harline Councilman Fred A. Neil City Planner, David S. Hugg III Councilman Ralph L. Taylor Jr. Economic Development Committee Mayor Robin R. Christiansen, Chair (Ex-Officio) Councilman Fred A. Neil Councilman Ralph L. Taylor Jr. Kim I. Adams (Minority Voting Member) Clayton E. Hammond II (Minority Voting Member) Assistant City Manager, Matthew Harline City Planner, David S. Hugg III Designee of the Downtown Dover Partnership, Diane Laird Page 107

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 25 Kent County Tourism Councilman Fred A. Neil Kent Economic Partnership Mayor Robin R. Christiansen (Council President's Designee) Liaison to Kent County Mayor Robin R. Christiansen Council President Roy Sudler Jr. Assistant City Manager, Matthew Harline Councilman David L. Anderson Councilwoman Tricia K. Arndt Councilman Andre M. Boggerty SETTING OF ELECTRIC, WATER, AND WASTEWATER RATES AND TARIFFS Mr. Matthew Harline, Interim City Manager, reviewed the proposed electric, water, and wastewater rates and tariffs. Staff recommended adoption of the Rates and Tariffs as presented for Fiscal Year 2021, setting the power cost adjustment of $0.0070 per kWh. Mr. Hare moved to adopt the rates and tariffs, as presented (Exhibit #1). The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. CONSIDERATION OF THE JUNETEENTH HOLIDAY Mr. Hare stated that the Juneteenth Holiday is a special day for a lot of people and it is also recognized by the state and the City of Wilmington. He stated the City of Dover should also make it a holiday. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Harline advised that there are 24/7 operation employees who would be required to work and they will have to pay overtime, so there would be a cost. Mr. Harline noted that he will get a response the following day as to how they will handle trash service and the overtime cost for the 24/7 employees. Mr. Hare moved that the City recognize the Juneteenth Holiday, June 19th for this year, seconded by Mr. Rocha. Mr. Sudler clarified that the holiday would fall on Friday, June 18th of this year. Mr. Hare moved that the City recognize the Juneteenth Holiday and that it be observed on Friday, June 18, 2021. The motion was seconded by Mr. Rocha and carried with Mr. Anderson voting no. Page 108

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 26 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-16 (CORRECTION) OUTDOOR WIRELESS CAMERA NETWORK - DOVER POLICE DEPARTMENT Council President Sudler advised that Resolution No. 2021-16 was before Council again for a correction. Mr. Hare moved to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2021-16. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. By unanimous consent Resolution No. 2021-16 was adopted: COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2021-16 A RESOLUTION TO APPLY FOR FY 2022 CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING PROCESS FOR OUTDOOR WIRELESS CAMERA NETWORK - DOVER POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, to improve public safety throughout the city, the City of Dover has invested heavily in community policing resources, public works personnel, and technologies to improve the delivery of health and safety services. The city has determined that additional help is needed to create both the reality and perception of adequate health and safety so that Dover can realize its potential; and WHEREAS, to make the City of Dover a safer and more efficient community and thus a very attractive location for residency, business and tourism, the City plans to implement a comprehensive outdoor wireless camera network throughout the city; and WHEREAS, studies have shown in other cities that have wireless camera networks throughout strategic locations, the reports of criminal activity have decreased, as the cameras act as effective deterrents to potential criminal activity; and WHEREAS, the camera package will include a total of forty camera clusters with 360-degree view. The first twenty will be located in community park areas, and twenty more will be located in other "at-risk" locations throughout the city; and WHEREAS, the City's Police Department desires to implement a vendor supplied enhancement that provides access to cooperating public and private video source points. This process could include corporate partners, private residences, and other governmental camera locations throughout the city to bring additional system capability. This expanded network of camera locations will help identify demands for city services and help the Dover Police Department detect criminal activity more quickly; and WHEREAS, the wireless camera locations throughout the City of Dover will provide real-time situational awareness to city officials charged with providing critical services. This group includes, but is not limited to: Public Works, Parks, Police, Electric and Sanitation. The city's public parks are especially vulnerable, as they are disproportionately visited by children and seniors for both recreation and exercise; and Page 109

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 27 WHEREAS, the Senate Appropriations Committee through a Fiscal Year 2022 Congressionally Directed Spending Request process, has made available funding for which the City of Dover and its Police Department can apply to aid in potentially funding this security equipment, which furthers the City's commitment to make Dover as safe as possible for its citizens and visitors, and help the city realize its full potential. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the City of Dover, Delaware, that the City Manager or his designee be authorized to submit a Fiscal Year 2022 Congressionally Directed Spending Request Application for the Police Department's Outdoor Wireless Camera Network. ADOPTED: JUNE 14, 2021 FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2021-15 Council President Sudler reminded the public that copies of the proposed ordinance were available on the City's website at www.cityofdover.com under "Government," or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 736-7008 or cityclerk@dover.de.us. Final action by Council on the proposed ordinance will take place during the Council Meeting of June 28, 2021. Mr. Matthew Harline, Interim City Manager, advised that the budget was originally proposed at $161,540,000 and it was a significant increase, largely due to capital increases over the previous year’s budget. He stated that they have cut $1.5 million to get down to a $0.02 property tax increase that would allow them to pass a balanced budget. Mr. Lindell requested a list of all the cuts that were being made. He expressed his concerns regarding deferring maintenance. Mr. Lindell noted that the large transfer they received should go to one-time expenses and replacing some of the outdated items to be more cost-efficient. Mr. Harline stated that he could get that list. Mr. Anderson stated that the tax increase should not happen because of the time that can be bought while they deal with the structural issues. He noted that there may need to be a tax increase in the future to make sure they cover public safety or there may not. Mr. Anderson stated that they will not know until they have the chance to see how things play out. He noted that he did not think it was a good thing to put more of a burden upon them this particular year. Mr. Anderson moved to refer Proposed Ordinance #2021-15 to the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting scheduled for June 15, 2021. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lindell and unanimously carried. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: Ordinance #2021-15 Fiscal Year 2021/2022 City of Dover Budget Ordinances Page 110

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 28 FINAL READING- PROPOSED ORDINANCES The First Reading of the Proposed Ordinances was accomplished during the Council Meeting of April 26, 2021. The Public Hearing was accomplished during the Special Council Meeting of June 7, 2021. Council President Sudler reminded members of the public that copies of the ordinances are available on the City's website at www.cityofdover.com under "Government." Comprehensive Zoning Map Amendment - Ordinance #2021-09 Mr. Neil moved that the Final Reading of the proposed ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of April 26, 2021.) By motion of Mr. Neil, seconded by Mr. Hare, Council, by a unanimous roll call vote, adopted Ordinance #2021-09, as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DOVER BY CHANGING ZONING DESIGNATIONS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO CONFORM WITH THE 2019 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within the limits of the City of Dover; and WHEREAS, Delaware Code, Title 22, Chapter 3 Municipal Zoning Regulations, Section 303. Purpose of Regulations, states that zoning regulations shall be made in accordance with a Comprehensive Plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets, to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, to promote health and the general welfare, to provide adequate light and air, to prevent the overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population, and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, Delaware Code, Title 22, Chapter 7 Planning Commission, Section 702 Comprehensive Development Plan, Item (c), states that the Comprehensive Plan shall be the basis for the development of zoning regulations and that upon adoption of the Comprehensive Development Plan, the official zoning map shall be amended to rezone all lands within the municipality in accordance with the uses of land provided for in the Comprehensive Development Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dover, on January 13, 2020, following the recommendation of the City of Dover Planning Commission, adopted the 2019 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Title 22, Section 702 of the Delaware Code; and then adopted amendments to the 2019 Comprehensive Plan on March 8, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Honorable John Carney, Governor of the State of Delaware, certified the 2019 Comprehensive Plan to be effective as of January 13, 2020 by letter of March 10, 2020; and Page 111

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 29 WHEREAS, Title 22 Section 702 of Delaware Code requires the City rezone properties in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and this analysis was undertaken as part of the implementation of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Dover Planning Office has reviewed the Land Development Plan Map (Map 12-1 as amended March 8, 2021) along with the Zoning Map, and during this review has identified a series of parcels for Rezoning. These Comprehensive Zoning Map Amendments are presented for review as part of the Comprehensive Rezoning 2021 Project and in accordance with the process outlined in the Dover Code of Ordinances, Appendix B - Zoning, Article 10 - Planning Commission, Section 5 - Amendments; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 17, 2021, after which the Planning Commission made a recommendation in regard to these amendments to the Zoning Map of the City of Dover. WHEREAS, the City of Dover has prepared the Comprehensive Rezoning 2021 Project Map and Summary Table showing recommendations to change the zoning designations for an identified series of properties so that the City of Dover Zoning Map is in accordance with the adopted 2019 Comprehensive Plan, as amended March 8, 2021. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Dover is amended by changing the zoning designations (Rezoning) of specific properties to conform with the Zoning Map changes presented to City Council on June 14, 2021 and as depicted on the Maps and Summary Table entitled "City of Dover Comprehensive Rezoning 2021 Project." (Planning Reference: MI-21-03 Comprehensive Rezoning 2021 Project) BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: That upon final action to adopt this ordinance, the adopted Comprehensive Zoning Map Amendments shall be reflected on the official Zoning Map of the City of Dover, DE and published accordingly. ADOPTED: JUNE 14, 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2021 Set #2 - Ordinance #2021-10 Mr. Neil moved that the Final Reading of the proposed ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of April 26, 2021.) By motion of Mr. Neil, seconded by Mr. Rocha, Council, by a unanimous roll call vote, adopted Ordinance #2021-10, as follows: Page 112

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 30 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2019 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY AMENDING TABLE 12-1: LAND USE AND ZONING MATRIX BY ADDING ZONING DISTRICTS TO CERTAIN LAND USE CATEGORIES. WHEREAS, the City of Dover has adopted a Comprehensive Plan laying out land use policies within the City of Dover, Delaware; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dover, on January 13, 2020, following the recommendation of the City of Dover Planning Commission, adopted the 2019 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Title 22, Section 702 of the Delaware Code; and then adopted amendments to the 2019 Comprehensive Plan on March 8, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Honorable John Carney, Governor of the State of Delaware, certified the 2019 Comprehensive Plan to be effective as of January 13, 2020 by letter of March 10, 2020; and WHEREAS, Title 22 Section 702 of Delaware Code requires the City rezone properties in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and this analysis was undertaken as part of the implementation of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Dover Planning Office has reviewed the Land Development Plan Map (Map 12-1 as amended March 8, 2021) along with the Zoning Map, and during this review has identified necessary plan text revisions to the associated Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix, of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan as amended. A set of plan text amendments to the Land Use and Zoning Matrix (Table 12-1) is presented for review as part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2021 Set #2; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 17, 2021, after which the Planning Commission made a recommendation in regard to these plan text amendments to the Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix. WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of zoning and planning in the City of Dover to add several zoning districts to certain Land Use Categories on the Land Use and Zoning Matrix (Table 12-1) as shown on the Exhibit of Proposed Revisions to 2019 Comprehensive Plan (on pages 12-26.1, 12-26.2 and 12-26.3) and known as Revised Table 12-1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET AND AMEND THE 2019 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY: That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance, that Chapter 12 - Land Development Plan, Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan as amended on March 8, 2021 has been amended by adding several zoning districts to certain Land Use Categories as noted in the referenced Exhibits presented to City Council on June 14, 2021. This will replace the referenced table with the Revised Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix. (Planning Reference: MI-21-04A Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2021 Set #2) Page 113

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 31 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: That upon final action to adopt this ordinance, the approved plan text amendments shown as Revised Table 12-1 shall be incorporated into Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan as amended and published accordingly. ADOPTED: JUNE 14, 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2021 Set #2 - Ordinance #2021-11 Mr. Neil moved that the Final Reading of the proposed ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of April 26, 2021.) By motion of Mr. Hare, seconded by Mr. Anderson, Council, by a unanimous roll call vote, adopted Ordinance #2021-11, as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2019 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY AMENDING MAP 12-1: LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS OF A SERIES OF PARCELS CITYWIDE. WHEREAS, the City of Dover has adopted a Comprehensive Plan laying out land use policies within the City of Dover, Delaware; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dover, on January 13, 2020, following the recommendation of the City of Dover Planning Commission, adopted the 2019 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Title 22, Section 702 of the Delaware Code; and then adopted amendments to the 209 Comprehensive Plan on March 8, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Honorable John Carney, Governor of the State of Delaware, certified the 2019 Comprehensive Plan to be effective as of January 13, 2020 by letter of March 10, 2020; and WHEREAS, Title 22 Section 702 of Delaware Code requires the City rezone properties in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and this analysis was undertaken as part of the implementation of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Dover Planning Office has reviewed the Land Development Plan Map (Map 12-1 as amended March 8, 2021) along with the Zoning Map, and during this review has identified necessary revisions to the Map 12-1: Land Development Plan Map of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan as amended. A set of amendments to the Land Development Plan Map (Map 12-1) is presented for review as part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2021 Set #2; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 17, 2021, after which the Planning Commission made a recommendation in regard to these amendments to the Map 12-1: Land Development Plan related to the Land Use Classifications of a series of properties. Page 114

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 32 WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of zoning and planning in the City of Dover to change the Land Use Classifications of a series of properties on the Land Development Plan Map (Map 12-1) as described and listed in the Summary Table Listing of Amendments to Land Development Plan Map and as depicted on Map Exhibits of Proposed Revisions to Land Development Plan of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET AND AMEND THE 2019 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY: That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance, that Map 12-1: Land Development Plan Map of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan as amended on March 8, 2021 has been amended by changing the designated Land Use Classifications of a series of properties as noted in the referenced Exhibits presented to City Council on June 14, 2021. This will revise the referenced map with the Amended Map 12-1: Land Development Plan as depicted in Summary Table Listing of Amendments to the Land Development Plan Map and Map Exhibits of Proposed Revisions to Land Development Plan. (Planning Reference: MI-21-04B Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2021 Set #2) BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: That upon final action to adopt this ordinance, the amendment as approved changing the Land Use Classifications of the listed properties shall be made to Map 12-1: Land Development Plan (as amended March 8, 2021) of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan and published accordingly. ADOPTED: JUNE 14, 2021 CITY MANAGER'S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Matthew Harline, Interim City Manager, invited Council to give him feedback of what they would like to see. He stated he has received some feedback to improve the City Manager’s monthly report and to start gathering the Committee Chairs. Mr. Harline noted that he plans to continue the Diversity and Inclusion Internal Committee. He stated that they were going to meet that week and get back to focusing on improving their recruiting, retention, and creating an environment where diversity and inclusions is clear throughout the organization. Mr. Harline noted that June 19, 1865 was the final emancipation of all citizens in Texas. COUNCIL MEMBERS' ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Boggerty asked if there had been any update regarding the Queen Manor issue. Responding, Mr. Sudler stated that he believed Mrs. Tracy Harvey, Planner/Community Development Block Grand (CDBG) Administrator, had followed up and that the Dover Housing Authority was in compliance with the relocation program and that they were going through for modification of the units. Page 115

Item #4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 PAGE 33 Mr. Taylor stated that the Police Chief’s Advisory Council, in collaboration with Mayor Christiansen and himself, were hosting a town hall meeting regarding strategies to combat violence in Dover at the Dover Police Department, Public Assembly room at 400 South Queen Street on Tuesday, June 22nd from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Mr. Taylor noted that due to the increased demands on every Council member, he would like to put a Council member pay increase on a Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee agenda. Mr. Anderson thanked a Polytech student who created the commercial spots for the August 1st - 9th Innovative Readiness Training (IRT) event with Delaware Health Initiative. He reminded everyone that people will be able to get medical screenings, dental care, eye exams and basic eye glasses made on site. Mr. Anderson thanked Mayor Christiansen for putting $5,000 toward marketing the event. Mr. Anderson noted that this time of year they recognize freedom with Flag Day, the Army’s birthday, and Juneteenth. Mr. Hare stated that it was very important for Mrs. Harvey to keep an eye on Queen Manor. Mr. Hare moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:12 p.m. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All ordinances, resolutions, motions, and orders adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of June 14, 2021 are hereby approved. ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /TM S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Council-Minutes\2021\06-14-2021 REGULAR.wpd Exhibits Exhibit #1 - City of Dover Rates & Tariffs Page 116

City of Dover Rates & Tariff EXHIBIT Item #4. #1 Regular City Council Meeting of 06/14/2021 City of Dover Rates & Tariffs July 1, 2021 Page 117 2

City of Dover Rates & Tariff TABLE OF CONTENTS Item #4. PAGE Purchased Power Adjustment “PPA” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Residential Service Classification “R”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Small Commercial Service Classification “C and C1". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Medium Commercial Service Classification “C2 and C3”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Large Commercial Service Classification “C5”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Primary Service Classification “P”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Transmission Voltage Classification “T”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Transmission Voltage Federal Government Classification “FT” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Transmission Voltage Interruptible Service Classification “IT” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Firm Standby and Supplemental Service Classification “SS”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Outdoor Development Lighting Rate (Residential Area Lighting Only) “OL”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Private Outdoor Lighting Service Classification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Water Pump Service Classification “FP”. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Water Pump 2 Service Classification Contracted Rate “F2”. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Water, Sewer, Kent County Sewer Adjustment and Ground Water Inflow Adjustment Rates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Trash Fees - Flat Rate Summaries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Green Energy Fund Rider “GEF”. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Net Energy Metering “NM”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Retail Customer Demand Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Page 118 3

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. PURCHASED POWER ADJUSTMENT “PPA” PPA for “all” Tariffs unless listed separately The cost per kWh for all energy adjusted upward or downward for changes in fuel and purchased power costs including transmission above or below the base rate amount per kWh for each rate class. When the total cost of fuel, purchased power, and transmission varies above or below the above base cost a charge or credit per kWh will be applied to all energy sold such that the cost or credit will be recovered or returned over time. All kWh - per kWh ($0.0070) Effective Date July 1, 2020 Page 119 4

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. RESIDENTIAL SERVICE CLASSIFICATION “R” This rate is available throughout the City of Dover electric service area for household related services in a single private dwelling and incidental service outside of the home through the same meter, provided such incidental service does not exceed 20 kW of connected load. Service size cannot exceed 600 amps. CHARACTER OF SERVICE Secondary voltage, 60 cycle, alternating current, single phase service Customer Charge Per bill $9.42 Energy Charge All kWh - per kWh $0.12090 MINIMUM MONTHLY BILL The minimum monthly bill shall be the Customer Charge. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt-hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 120 5

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. SMALL COMMERCIAL SERVICE CLASSIFICATION “C and C1" AVAILABILITY This rate is available throughout the City of Dover electric service area for small commercial and industrial purposes through a single meter. The maximum monthly usage must not exceed 3,500 kWh per month or have instrument rated metering. If there is a major change in the character of service or if the kWh usage exceeds 3,500 kWh for two (2) consecutive billing months, the account will be automatically transferred to the Medium Commercial Service Classification. If the customer’s usage does not exceed 3,500 kWh after a period of one (1) year, the customer may be returned to the Small Commercial Service Classification. CHARACTER OF SERVICE Secondary voltage, 60 cycle, alternating current, single or three phase service. Other voltages may be applicable where available and at the option of the City. Customer Charge Per bill - Single Phase Service $9.28 Per bill - Three Phase Service $24.28 Energy Charge Per kWh $0.10080 MINIMUM MONTHLY BILLING The minimum monthly billing shall be the Customer Charge. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt-hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 121 6

City of Dover Rates & Tariff MEDIUM COMMERCIAL SERVICE CLASSIFICATION Item #4. “C2 and C3" AVAILABILITY This rate is available throughout the City of Dover electric service area for commercial and industrial purposes through a single meter having monthly usages of more than 3,500 kWh for two (2) consecutive months. If the customer has a major change in the character of service and falls below the above criteria, the customer may be returned to the Small Commercial Service Classification. CHARACTER OF SERVICE Secondary voltage, 60 cycle, alternating current, single or three phase service. Other voltages may be applicable and at the option of the City. Customer Charge Per Bill - Single Phase Service $15.96 Per Bill - Three Phase Service $30.96 Demand Charge All kW, per kW $12.85 Energy Charge All kWh, per kWh $0.06390 DETERMINATION OF DEMAND The Billing Demand will be the maximum fifteen (15) minute demand during the month, determined by a block demand meter. MINIMUM MONTHLY BILLING The minimum monthly bill shall be the Customer Charge and a Demand Charge, which shall be based on sixty percent (60%) of the greatest Billing Demand established during any month of the 11-month period ending with the current billing month. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt-hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 122 7

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. LARGE COMMERCIAL SERVICE CLASSIFICATION “C5" AVAILABILITY This rate is available throughout the City of Dover electric service area for commercial and industrial purposes having instrument rated metering. If there is a significant change in the character of service, the City will, at its option on a case by case basis, temporarily transfer the account to another tariff. CHARACTER OF SERVICE Secondary voltage, 60 cycle alternating current, single or three phase service. Other voltages may be applicable when available and at the option of the City. Customer Charge Per bill - single or three phase service $27.06 Demand Charge All kW - per kW $12.86 Energy Charge All kWh - per kWh $0.06210 DETERMINATION OF DEMAND The Billing Demand will be the maximum fifteen (15) minute demand during the month, determined by a block demand meter. In any month in which the average power factor at the delivery point is greater or less than ninety-five percent (95%), the measured demand shall be corrected in accordance with the following formula: Billing Demand = Measured demand X .95 Average Power Factor The city measures both leading and lagging power factor, treating both as non-unity power factors, and the customer is billed accordingly. MINIMUM MONTHLY BILLING The minimum monthly bill shall be the Customer Charge and a Demand Charge based on sixty percent (60%) of the greatest Billing Demand established during any month of the 11-month period ending with the current billing month. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt-hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 123 8

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. PRIMARY SERVICE CLASSIFICATION “P” AVAILABILITY This rate is available throughout the City of Dover electric service area for commercial and industrial customers taking delivery at the primary voltage available, and where the transforming and protective apparatus is furnished, owned and maintained by the customer. CHARACTER OF SERVICE Primary voltage, 60 cycle, alternating current, single phase or three phase service. Customer Charge Per bill - single or three phase $24.32 Demand Charge All kW - per kW $10.09 Energy Charge All kWh - per kWh $0.06320 DETERMINATION OF DEMAND The Billing Demand will be the maximum sixty (60) minute demand during the month, determined by a block demand meter. In any month in which the average power factor at the delivery point is greater or less than ninety-five (95%), the measured demand shall be corrected in accordance with the following formula: Billing Demand = Measured demand x .95 Average Power Factor The City measures both leading and lagging power factor, treating both as non-unity power factors and the customers are billed accordingly. MINIMUM MONTHLY BILL The minimum monthly bill shall be the Customer Charge and a Demand Charge, which shall be based on the greater of three hundred kilowatts (300 kW) or 60% of the greatest Billing Demand established during any month of the 11-month period ending with the current billing month. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt-hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. If a customer who is on the Primary Service Classification wishes to switch to the Large Commercial Service Classification, the customer may do so at the customer's choice. If such a change occurs, the City will determine on a case-by-case basis which portion, if any, of the customer-owned electrical equipment will be maintained by the City provided; however, any equipment transferred to City ownership, will be transferred at no cost to the City. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 124 9

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. TRANSMISSION VOLTAGE CLASSIFICATION “T” AVAILABILITY This rate is available by special contract throughout the City of Dover electric service area to customers located where Dover's existing facilities are adequate to supply the character of service as specified below. CHARACTER OF SERVICE The electric power delivered hereunder shall be three phase, 60 cycle, alternating current at a nominal potential of sixty-nine thousand (69,000) volts. Demand, energy and power factor will be metered at the point of delivery of service. All transformation, circuiting and protective apparatus beyond the point of delivery shall be installed, owned, and maintained by the customer. Service shall be supplied and metered at sixty-nine thousand (69,000), and the customer is required to own and maintain all transforming, switching and protective equipment. Demand Charge All kW - per kW $9.14 Energy Charge All kWh, per kWh $0.05990 DETERMINATION OF DEMAND The measured demand shall be the average of the four (4) greatest sixty (60) minute demands measured on separate days of each month. In any month in which the average power factor at the delivery point is greater or less than ninety-eight and one half percent (98.5%), the measured demand shall be corrected in accordance with the following formula: Billing Demand = Measured demand x . 985 Average Power Factor The City measures both leading and lagging power factor, treating both as non-unity power factors; customers are billed accordingly. MINIMUM MONTHLY BILL The minimum monthly bill shall be a Demand Charge, which shall be based on the greater of three hundred kilowatts (300 kW) or 75% of the greatest Billing Demand established during any month of the 11-month period ending with the current billing month. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt-hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 125 10

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. TRANSMISSION VOLTAGE FEDERAL GOVERMENT CLASSIFICATION “FT” AVAILABILITY This rate is available by special contract throughout the City of Dover electric service area for Federal Government customers located where Dover's existing facilities are adequate to supply the character of service as specified below. CHARACTER OF SERVICE The electric power delivered hereunder shall be three phase, 60 cycle, alternating current at a nominal potential of sixty-nine thousand (69,000) volts. Demand, energy and power factor will be metered at the point of delivery of service. All transformation, circuiting and protective apparatus beyond the point of delivery shall be installed, owned, and maintained by the customer. Service shall be supplied and metered at sixty-nine thousand (69,000), and the customer is required to own and maintain all transforming, switching and protective equipment. Demand Charge All kW - per kW $9.14 Energy Charge All kWh, per kWh $0.05970 DETERMINATION OF DEMAND The measured demand shall be the average of the four (4) greatest sixty (60) minute demands measured on separate days of each month. In any month in which the average power factor at the delivery point is greater or less than ninety-eight and one half percent (98.5%), the measured demand shall be corrected in accordance with the following formula: Billing Demand = Measured demand x .985 Average Power Factor The City measures both leading and lagging power factor, treating both as non-unity power factors; customers are billed accordingly. MINIMUM MONTHLY BILL The minimum monthly bill shall be a Demand Charge, which shall be based on the greater of three hundred kilowatts (300 kW) or 75% of the greatest Billing Demand established during any month of the 11-month period ending with the current billing month. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt-hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. POWER SUPPLY PLANNING Customer shall provide to the City of Dover each year in January a load forecast for the next three years for the planning period of May through June (example: May 2019 through June 2022) to allow Dover to plan and acquire power supply resources to meet customer’s requirements. Any changes in the Customer’s expected load forecast that is greater than one (1) megawatt shall be reported to the City of Dover within thirty (30) days of Customer’s knowledge of such change. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 126 11

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. INTERRUPTIBLE TRANSMISSION VOLTAGE CLASSIFICATION “IT” AVAILABILITY This rate is available by special contract throughout the City of Dover electric service area to customers located where Dover's existing facilities are adequate to supply the character of service as specified below. CHARACTER OF SERVICE The electric power delivered hereunder shall be three phase, 60 cycle, alternating current at a nominal potential of sixty-nine thousand (69,000) volts. Demand, energy and power factor will be metered at the point of delivery of service. All transformation, circuiting and protective apparatus beyond the point of delivery shall be installed, owned, and maintained by the customer. Service shall be supplied and metered at sixty-nine thousand (69,000), and the customer is required to own and maintain all transforming, switching and protective equipment. Demand Charge Annual On Peak Penalty All kW - per kW $7.89 To be determined by City Manager Energy Charge All kWh, per kWh $0.06180 DETERMINATION OF DEMAND The measured demand shall be the average of the four (4) greatest sixty (60) minute demands measured on separate days of each month. In any month in which the average power factor at the delivery point is greater or less than ninety-eight and one half percent (98.5%), the measured demand shall be corrected in accordance with the following formula: Billing Demand = Measured demand x .985 Average Power Factor The City measures both leading and lagging power factor, treating both as non-unity power factors; customers are billed accordingly. MINIMUM MONTHLY BILL The minimum monthly bill shall be a Demand Charge, which shall be based on the greater of three hundred kilowatts (300 KW) or 75% of the greatest Billing Demand established during any month of the 11-month period ending with the current billing month. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt-hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2018 Page 127 12

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. FIRM STANDBY AND SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICE CLASSIFICATION “SS” – (C5, P, & T) AVAILABILTY This rate is available throughout the City of Dover electric service area to customers for firm standby and/or supplemental electric service for commercial and industrial purposes whom would otherwise be billed from the C5: Large Commercial Service, P: Primary Service, or T: Transmission Voltage electric tariffs. Qualifying customers shall take delivery at the voltage available, and where the transforming and protective apparatus is furnished, owned and maintained by the customer. To service customers with electric generation facilities used to serve onsite power requirements and requiring firm standby and/or supplemental electric service. This rate is not applicable for customers whom meet one or more of the following criteria: 1. Onsite generation is for emergency or testing purposes only. 2. Onsite generating capability is less than 500 kW. Service under this schedule is also available to any specific generation customer who does not satisfy the provisions above and to whom providing service, in City of Dover’s opinion, would be beneficial to its other customers. CHARACTER OF SERVICE Secondary or primary voltages, 60 cycle alternating current, single phase or three phase service. Standby (Maintenance and Back-Up) Service Charges: Customer Charge Per bill – single or three phase: $122.37 per month Demand Charges Daily Demand Charge: $0.23 per kW day of actual demand Reservation Charge: $4.93 per kW of Contract Standby Billing Demand per month Plus a distribution charge for the associated service voltage. Primary Distribution Charge: Included Secondary Distribution Charge: Included Note: Distribution Charges are not applicable where electric service is provided solely from the transmission system. Energy Charge All kWh – per kWh: $0.05900 Supplemental Service Charges: Supplemental Service shall be billed at the City of Dover’s otherwise applicable electric rates. DETERMINATION OF BILLING DEMAND Standby Billing Demand – Standby billing demand is the summation of the maximum integrated sixty (60) minute standby demand delivered by the City of Dover each day of the billing period. Standby demand for each sixty (60) minute period is the integrated sixty (60) minute demand delivered by the City, but not exceeding the difference between the contract standby demand and the sixty (60) minute integrated kW output of the customer's generating unit(s), but never less than zero. In any month in which the average power factor at the delivery point is greater or less than ninety-five (95) percent, the measured demand shall be corrected in accordance with the following formula: Billing Demand = Measured demand x .95 Average Power Factor Page 128 13

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. The City measures both leading and lagging power factor, treating both as non-unity power factors; customers are billed accordingly. Contract Reserved Standby Demand - The demand contracted shall not exceed the net dependable capability of the customer's generating equipment. This demand will remain constant unless agreed to by mutual consent and appropriate changes are made to the tariff agreement and the agreement executed by the City and the customer. If at any point, Standby Billing Demand exceeds Contract Reserved Standby Demand, the Contract Demand rating shall be revised to match the Standby Demand rating that exceeded the Contract Demand rating. Supplemental Billing Demand - Supplemental billing demand for the month shall be the maximum sixty (60) minute integrated "Supplemental Demand" for the month. It is intended that this demand shall fairly represent the capacity which the City is required to stand ready to supply in excess of the customer's generating capacity. In any month in which the average power factor at the delivery point is greater or less than ninety-five (95) percent, the measured demand shall be corrected in accordance with the following formula: Billing Demand = Measured demand x .95 Average Power Factor The City measures both leading and lagging power factor, treating both as non-unity power factors; customers are billed accordingly. Supplemental Demand - Determined for each sixty (60) minute interval as the net sixty (60) minute integrated demand delivered by the City of Dover minus the standby billing demand. Installations which use this service in a manner such that measurement of a sixty (60) minute interval does not result in fair or equitable measure of the supply capacity required to serve the customer's load, then the measured demand may be adjusted taking into account the known character of use and the rating data of the equipment connected or from special tests. It is the intent of this provision that the demand billed shall fairly represent the customer's capacity requirement. In cases where City of Dover elects to use connected load instead of demand measurement as the method for determining demand, it will take into account the known character of use and the rating data of the equipment connected. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt-hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt-hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. MINIMUM MONTHLY BILL The minimum monthly bill shall be the Customer Charge, Reservation Charge, Distribution Charge plus Adjustments. The billing demand charge for all kW up to the maximum contracted standby requirements for each month will be billed at the maximum of: The Reservation Charge plus any Primary or Secondary Distribution Charges per kW-month times the contracted standby demand requirements or per kW-day (charge listed above) of actual standby demand delivered. All kW between the actual standby demand and the contract demand will be billed at the Reservation Charge rate plus any Primary or Secondary Distribution Charges per kW-month. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. Page 129 14

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. TEMPORARY DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any customer prior to resuming service within 12-months after such service was discontinued, will be required to pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been discontinued. TERMS AND CONDITIONS Power factor at the time of the monthly peak demand must be maintained above ninety-five (95) percent. Service hereunder is subject to the rules and regulations for electric service as adopted by City of Dover from time to time and on file with the City Clerk. Service hereunder will be supplied at one location through one point of delivery and measured through one meter unless otherwise deemed necessary by City of Dover. Customers electing to receive service under this rate tariff are required to provide a sixty (60) month notice, in writing, prior to transferring from this firm supplemental and standby service to any of the City of Dover’s firm full requirements service. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 130 15

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. OUTDOOR DEVELOPMENT LIGHTING RATE (Residential Area Lighting Only) “OL” AVAILABILITY This rate is available throughout the City of Dover service area for residential developments/mobile home park lighting. CHARACTER OF SERVICE Secondary voltage, 60 cycle alternating current, single phase. TERMS OF SERVICE The association and/or owner shall install and maintain all lighting and associated equipment. This rate applies to one metering point. If multiple metering points are required to reduce voltage drop, a totalized bill will be rendered. The metering point(s) will be governed by the City of Dover. The initial term for lighting service shall be for one (1) year with automatic month to month extension until either party terminated this agreement via letter. Billing will be monthly. If this contract is terminated prior to the one (1) year agreement, the customer shall reimburse the City of Dover for all expenses incurred. Customer Charge Per Bill $8.25 Energy Charge All kWh - per kWh $0.11230 MINIMUM MONTHLY CHARGE The minimum monthly bill shall be the Customer Charge. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All kilowatt-hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2018 Page 131 16

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. PRIVATE OUTDOOR LIGHTING SERVICE CLASSIFICATION AVAILABILITY This rate is available throughout the City of Dover electric service area for all-night outdoor lighting service for lighting of outdoor areas on private property. CHARACTER OF SERVICE UNMETERED - This will be the standard installation practice. The lights under this classification shall be fed directly from the City of Dover’s energy source. METERED - This classification will be available at the City of Dover’s discretion and only when it is not feasible to install the lighting service from an unmetered source. These lights will have the energy supplied through the customers meter and the monthly rental fee shall be reduced to reflect this customer expense. TERMS OF SERVICE The equipment supplied will be the type of fixture currently being furnished by the City at the time of installation as described below in the Classifications of Security Lights, Decorative Lighting, and Roadway/Area Lighting. Lighting shall be from dusk to dawn each day. The initial term for lighting service shall be for two (2) years. The City may require a fee if the installation is removed prior to the two (2) year term. Where service is not associated with a metered service, a Customer Charge of $5.00 for residential lights and $10.00 for commercial lights will be added to cover the associated costs of billing and related consumer costs not reflected in the lighting schedule. Unmetered - The City shall maintain, relamp, and supply the energy to the lighting equipment that it owns. Metered - The City shall also maintain and relamp the lighting equipment it owns where energy is supplied through the customer’s meter. The City will perform relamping, repair, and/or maintenance during normal working hours within a reasonable period following notification by the Customer. Customers requiring unique or unusual lighting service different than outlined below may obtain such service under a mutually agreeable contractual arrangement. SECURITY LIGHTS Includes a 2' (+/-) arm, pole not included. If a pole needs to be installed, the location shall be accessible to truck traffic via driveway, roadway, alleyway, or other public accessible parking areas. If a pole must be installed and the location is not truck accessible, a decorative lighting fixture may be installed at the applicable rated. Unmetered Est. Monthly Metered Monthly Monthly Charge kWh Rental Charge 100 watt HPS $7.70 35 175 watt HPS $9.08 68 100 watt HPS, equivalent LED $5.19 53 No Longer Available 175 watt HPS, equivalent LED $5.34 74 No Longer Available The following style is not available for new installations: 70 watt HPS $6.70 33 175 watt MV $9.08 68 No Longer Available Page 132 17

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. DECORATIVE LIGHTING Includes a 18' fiberglass pole (15' above ground). The electrical service to these poles shall be underground; therefore, the installation location shall be accessible to trencher traffic. Unmetered Est. Monthly Metered Monthly Monthly Charge kWh Rental Charge 150 watt HPS w/o ladder rest $14.51 62 6.58 250 watt HPS w/o ladder rest $20.31 101 8.43 70 watt HPS, equivalent LED $9.56 29 No Longer Available 150 watt HPS, equivalent LED $12.88 74 The following style is not available for new installations: Est. Monthly Metered Monthly Monthly Charge kWh Rental Charge 70 watt HPS w/o ladder rest $11.65 33 6.41 175 watt MV w/o ladder rest $14.17 68 175 watt MV contemporary $14.81 68 ROADWAY/AREA LIGHTING Includes choice of bracket from 8' to 16' if the fixture is accessible to truck traffic via driveway, roadway, alleyway, or other public accessible parking areas. If not accessible to trucks a 2' (+/-) arm shall be used. Pole not included. Unmetered Est. Monthly Metered Monthly Monthly Charge kWh Rental Charge 100 watt HPS $9.41 47 3.74 250 watt HPS $14.29 101 4.03 400 watt HPS $19.25 154 4.27 100 watt, equivalent LED $7.40 36 250 watt, equivalent LED $9.99 107 400 watt, equivalent LED $13.51 200 400 watt HPS, equivalent LED $9.55 139 No Longer Available The following style is not available for new installations: Unmetered Est. Monthly Metered Monthly Monthly Charge kWh Rental Charge 175 watt MV $10.30 68 3.20 250 watt MV $14.29 101 4.03 400 watt MV $19.16 154 4.21 Page 133 18

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. POLE CHARGES PER MONTH For each wood pole required exclusively for the support of lighting fixtures or lighting circuits under this service classification a per pole charge will be assessed as follows: Monthly Charge Poles installed through February 28, 1997 $2.09 Poles installed or changed out after February 28, 1997 $3.22 Poles installed after July 1, 2018 $6.08 PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All billed charges under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 134 19

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. WATER PUMP SERVICE CLASSIFICATION “FP” AVAILABILITY This rate is available throughout the City of Dover electric service area for water pumps used for emergency firefighting purposes and related equipment. CHARACTER OF SERVICE Secondary voltage, 60 cycle, alternating current, single or three phase service. Other voltages may be applicable where available and at the option of the City. Customer Charge Per bill $15.00 Demand Charge All kW, per kW $8.29 Energy Charge All $0.13840 kWh, per kWh DETERMINATION OF DEMAND The Billing Demand will be the maximum fifteen (15) minute demand during the month, determined by a block demand meter. In the case of fluctuating loads, the demand of which cannot readily be measured, the Billing Demand may be established from manufacturer’s rating or determined by other suitable methods. MINIMUM MONTHLY BILL The minimum monthly bill shall be the Customer Charge and a Demand Charge based on 60% of the greatest Billing Demand established during any month of the 24‐month period, ending with the current billing month. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All billed charges under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 135 20

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. WATER PUMP 2 SERVICE CLASSIFICATION CONTRACTED RATE “F2" AVAILABILITY This rate is available throughout the City of Dover electric service area by contract only. Contract terms will be for a minimum of ten (10) years. Service will be available for water pumps used for emergency firef ighting purposes and related equipment. Service will be supplied through one (1) meter. HP determination will be the total hp of all motors. CHARACTER OF SERVICE Secondary voltage, 60 cycle, alternating current, single or three phase service. Other voltages may be applicable where available and at the option of the City. Customer Charge Up to 50 hp motor(s) $100.00 Over 50 hp up to 100 hp motor(s) $150.00 Over 100 hp motor(s) $300.00 Demand Charge All kW, per kW $8.29 Energy Charge All $0.13840 kWh, per kWh DETERMINATION OF DEMAND The Billing Demand will be the maximum fifteen (15) minute demand during the month, determined by a block demand meter. In the case of fluctuating loads, the demand of which cannot readily be measured, the Billing Demand may be established from manufacturer’s rating or determined by other suitable methods. MINIMUM MONTHLY BILL The minimum monthly bill shall be the Customer Charge. PURCHASE COST ADJUSTMENT All billed charges under this rate shall be subject to the Purchase Cost Adjustment Clause included with the City of Dover rate schedules and approved by the Council of the City of Dover. PUBLIC UTILITY TAX In addition to the charges provided for in this service classification, a surcharge will apply in accordance with any tax imposed by governmental authority upon sales of electricity. RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE All kilowatt hours billed under this rate shall be subject to the “GEF” Rider. RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 136 21

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. WATER, SEWER, KENT COUNTY SEWER ADJUSTMENT AND GROUND WATER INFLOW ADJUSTMENT RATES Water: WITHIN CITY OUTSIDE CITY Customer Charge $5.00 $5.00 Water Rate – Tier 1 – 0 – 6,000 gallons $2.66 / 1,000 gallons $4.00 / 1,000 gallons Water Rate – Tier 2 – 6,001 – 100,000 gallons $3.33 / 1,000 gallons $5.00 / 1,000 gallons Water Rate – Tier 3 – Over 100,000 gallons $4.00 / 1,000 gallons $5.99 / 1,000 gallons Sewer: WITHIN CITY OUTSIDE CITY Customer Charge $5.00 $5.00 Sewer Rate $3.03/1,000 gallons $4.55/1,000 gallons WITHIN CITY OUTSIDE CITY Kent County Sewer Adjustment: $2.58 / 1,000 gallons $2.58 / 1,000 gallons Ground Water Inflow Adjustment $1.72 / 1,000 gallons $1.72 / 1,000 gallons Sewer charges are based on usage reported on water meters (WMT), and sewer meters (SMT). The sewer rate is $ 3.03 / 1,000 gallons for those within the City and $4.55 / 1,000 gallons for those outside the City Limits. Kent County Sewer Adjustments is based on sewer usage. The rate for Kent County Sewer Adjustment is $2.58 / 1,000 gallons and is set by the Kent County Sewer Authority. All revenue produced by this charge is forwarded to the Sewer Authority. Lawn Meter Rates are based on current in city / out city water tier rates. Effective Date: July 1, 2021 Page 137 22

City of Dover Rates & Tariff TRASH FEES Item #4. IN CITY ‐ FLAT RATE SUMMARY Rate Code Description Unit Charge DC I SVCF Trash Service Fee $ 23.00 D C I 33‐1 1 Pick Up 300 Gallon 72.00 D C I 33‐2 2 Pick Ups 300 Gallon 143.00 D C I 33-3 3 Pick Ups 300 Gallon 207.00 D C I 90‐1 1 Pick Up 90 Gallon 23.00 D C I 90‐2 2 Pick Ups 90 Gallon 46.00 D C I 90‐4 4 Pick Ups 90 Gallon 92.00 D R I FLAT Residential Trash 23.00 D R I SVCF Trash Service Fee 23.00 D R I 33‐1 1 Pick Up 300 Gallon 72.00 D R I 33‐2 2 Pick Ups 300 Gallon 143.00 D R I 90‐1 1 Pick Up 90 Gallon 23.00 D R I 90‐2 2 Pick Ups 90 Gallon 46.00 D R I 90‐3 3 Pick Ups 90 Gallon 69.00 D R I 90‐4 4 Pick Ups 90 Gallon 92.00 Effective Date: July 1, 2021 Page 138 23

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. GREEN ENERGY FUND Rider “GEF” Delaware Green Energy Fund Charge ‐ A State‐mandated charge for the municipal green energy fund established under 26 Del. C. §363(4) and collected from every Customer based on energy usage which is used to fund environmental programs for conservation and energy efficiency within the City’s service territory. Delaware Green Energy Fund Charge All kWh ‐ per kWh .000178 TAX ADJUSTMENT Billings under this rate may be increased by an amount equal to the sum of taxes payable under the Gross Receipts Tax and of all other taxes, fees or charges (exclusive of all valorem, state and federal income taxes) payable by the utility and levied or assessed by any governmental authority on the public utility service rendered, or on the right of privilege of rendering the service, or on any object or event incidental to the rendition of the service. Effective Date: July 1, 2008 Page 139 24

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. NET ENERGY METERING “NM” AVAILABILITY This rider is available to customers served under the following service classifications, Residential “R”, Small Commercial “C and C1”, Medium Commercial “C2 and C3", Large Commercial “C5", Primary “P”, and Transmission “T” that own and operate an electric generation facility on the Customer’s premises that produces electricity from Eligible Energy Resources to offset part or all of the Customer’s electricity requirements. CONNECTION TO THE CITY’S SYSTEM The Customer or Community-owned electric generation facility cannot be connected to the City’s system unless it meets all applicable safety and performance standards set forth by the following: The City of Dover Technical Considerations Covering Parallel Operations of Customer Owned Generation of 500 kW located in the Electric Service Handbook, National Electric Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Underwriters Laboratories, and the City of Dover Electric Service Handbook (Handbook). The Customer must, at his/her expense, obtain any and all necessary permits, inspections, and approvals required by any local public authorities and any other governing regulations in effect at that time. POWER SUPPLY PLANNING: Customer shall provide to the City of Dover each year in [Dover’s planning month for PJM] a load forecast for the next three years (“the Planning Period”) to allow Dover to plan and acquire power supply resources to meet customer’s requirements. Any changes in the Customer’s expected load forecast that is greater than one (1) megawatt shall be reported to the City of Dover within thirty (30) days of Customer’s knowledge of such change. DELIVERED VOLTAGE The delivered voltage and delivery point of the Customer’s electric generation shall be at the same delivered voltage and delivery point that would be supplied by the City to the Customer if the Customer purchased all of its electricity from the City. RATE The monthly billing shall be as stated in the applicable rate tariff. Under this rider, only the kWh charge for electricity delivered by the Customer is affected. The Customer will pay for all kWh delivered by the City of Dover. Credit for kWh under Section 4.3.2 and 4.4 of this Handbook shall be the budgeted average cost of energy as further described in 4.4.5 of this Handbook and will be valued at the applicable rate classification charge. Residential (R) $0.12090 Small Commercial (C&C1) $0.10080 Medium Commercial (C2 & C3) $0.06390 Large Commercial (C5) $0.06210 Primary (P) $0.06320 Transmission (T) $0.05990 Federal Transmission (FT) $0.05970 RULES AND REGULATIONS The General Rules and Regulations of the City of Dover for electric service shall apply to service rendered under this service classification. All minimum billings, charges for kWh, kW, Purchased Cost Adjustment, Public Utility Tax, Renewal Energy Charge, etc. will be covered under the applicable rate tariff. Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Page 140 25

City of Dover Rates & Tariff Item #4. RETAIL CUSTOMER DEMAND RESPONSE AVAILABILITY The Dover Electric Utility (“Dover”) or its authorized designee is the sole entity permitted to bid demand response directly into the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (“PJM”) (“DR Program”) on behalf of retail customers served by Dover. No Customer may participate in a DR program of any other entity unless such program is consistent with the terms and conditions in this tariff and approved in advance by Dover. Dover or its authorized designee may allow a Customer to bid DR into PJM’s ancillary services market for energy imbalance, spinning reserves, supplemental reserves, reactive power and voltage control, or regulation and frequency response ancillary services, subject to the same terms and conditions. DR programs may reduce electric service costs for the Customer, provide enhanced usage data, reduce emissions from electric generation, and provide demand flexibility. CONTENTS OF APPLICATION Customer shall submit to Dover a written request to participate that includes the following: 1) Type of DR program; and 2) Metering requirements for participation. Dover’s approval of the application shall be granted within fourteen (14) days. EFFECT OF APPLICATION AND PARTICIPATION IN DR PROGRAM Dover’s receipt and review of any documentation submitted by a Customer shall not constitute approval of such DR Provider or a guarantee of performance or payment by a DR Provider, nor shall Dover be liable for ANY damages sustained by the Customer. RIGHT TO TERMINATE PARTICIPATION IN DR PROGRAM Dover reserves the right to disapprove a request to participate in a DR program or to terminate participation by Customer when, in Dover’s sole discretion, Dover determines that participation by Customer will be detrimental to another customer or to the City of Dover. SPECIAL METERING REQUIREMENTS If Customer requires special metering equipment or devices to participate in the DR program, Customer shall provide the specifications for such equipment or devices in writing to the Dover Electric Department at the time of application or promptly thereafter. Within fourteen (14) days thereafter, Dover will provide the Customer with an estimate of the cost of the special metering equipment or devices and an estimate of the cost of providing special meter reading data. The cost of any special metering equipment or device shall be the responsibility of the Customer and shall be paid prior to the scheduled installation date. All costs for data or special readings shall be billed to Customer monthly. Effective Date: February 28, 2011 Page 141 26

Item #5. Economic Development Committee Minutes April 13, 2021- 4:00 p.m. The Economic Development Committee Meeting was held by video conference on April 13, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. with Mayor Robin R. Christiansen presiding. Committee Members present via video or telephone were Councilman David Anderson, Kim Adams, Dave Hugg-City Planner, Randy Robertson - City Manager, and Diane Laird were present. Councilman Roy Sudler and Clayton E. Hammond II were not present. Guests present Kevin Quinn and Matthew Suchodolski from Economic Development Administration. WELCOME At 4:00 pm Mayor Robin R. Christiansen called the Economic Development Meeting to order. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mayor Christiansen called for a motion to adopt the Agenda. Dave Hugg moved for adoption of agenda, seconded by Councilman David Anderson, unanimously carried. (Councilman Roy Sudler and Clayton E. Hammond II absent). ADOPTION OF MINUTES Mayor Christiansen called for a motion to adopt February 9, 2021 minutes. Diane Laird moved for adoption of minutes, seconded by Councilman Anderson, unanimously carried. (Councilman Roy Sudler and Clayton E. Hammond II absent). KEVIN QUINN – ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION – DISCUSS SPECIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES Kevin Quinn and Matthew Suchodolski from the Economic Development Administration (EDA) gave a PowerPoint presentation please see Attachment 1. Matthew Suchodolski states his appreciation for time tonight. The Delaware State University Center very important project funding requested in 2011. 2021 EDA was able to feature Delaware State University this past summer coordinated outreach with National Association of Development Organizations (NADO) as a historically black college and University were able demonstrate the good work the students of Economic Development and Business programming do and can do. They have been recognized International Economic Development Council as a model program. They obtain the course work to allow them to be equipped for Economic Page 142

Economic Development Meeting of April 13, 2021 PAGE 2 Item #5. Development Certification. The alignment with Delaware State can not be overlooked they were one of 11 universities throughout the nation that were featured. Matthew Suchodolski states Councilman Anderson had early questions relative to Dover Air Force Base for Department of Defense programming. Outreached to Douglas Edward Brown whom shared notice of funding opportunities that will be apparent this fiscal year. Matthew Suchodolski will share that information via email. Councilman Anderson asks when it comes to the Covid Grants and opportunity zones would something like money for small business revolving loan fund (RLF) would that qualify for Covid funding. Kevin Quinn state the RLF granted to the state will cover all three counties, as well as three additional RLFs one per each county. The City of Dover could start RLF specifically for Dover, but they cannot cross, business cannot get funding from multiple RLFs. Councilman Anderson next question is who handles destination funds? Kevin Quinn states he is not familiar with these funds. Matthew Suchodolski state under American Recovery Plan the congressional appropriation speaks to a certain percentage of that appropriation for EDA to be for travel, tourism, and outdoor recreation. There will be funds just do not have terms of engagement yet. Mayor Christiansen welcomes Mr. Randy Robertson our new City Manager Diane Laird, she and Lisa have been working on grant request through USDA that was submitted on March 31 for a revolving loan fund. It is nice to know that we may be able to look for more additional funding. Would EDA funding be available for Master Planning Downtown. Kevin Quinn said yes please send him a proposal for RLF also that is not duplicating efforts from other RLF in Delaware. Also, yes the EDA helps with master planning and feasibility studies would be happy to discuss further down the road and off line. They will assist with sewer, roads, outdated infrastructure, and attracting business that will hire. Mr. Randy Robertson asks Mr. Hugg is this same planning process we spoke a week ago with Ms. Parkowski or is it different. Dave Hugg states it is the same notion. Mr. Robertson asks if this is the same RFP conceptually and Dave Hugg confirmed. Dave Hugg asks if infrastructure funding would apply if City is interested in developing or redevelop municipal complex example a new City Hall. Kevin Quinn states not it is not it has be in regards to job creation. Example when he was in Tennessee that brought in Volkswagen, they had an area of undeveloped land. They gave them a grant to clear land, redo rail lines, water and sewer. That is more classic EDA Public Works for funding. Dave asks if underutilized unused farm land as a future employment zone linked to air force base those would be eligible, and Mr. Kevin Quinn stated yes. Page 143

Economic Development Meeting of April 13, 2021 PAGE 3 Item #5. Lisa Chase asks Kevin if she can talk off line, he agrees to go through each project that they have lined up. Lisa asks if there is a funding cap on these grants. Kevin says yes and no for example if you ask for 20 million for an RLF you must bring it down. You have to be realistic and have match. Lisa asks if it will be a one to one match, Kevin says yes match makes your application more competitive. Councilman Anderson, the hospital expanded and other job opportunities, but the water sewer piping would need to expand would EDA give match for it. Kevin Quinn states yes that is what EDA does and that would be competitive under Public Works. Councilman Anderson would be enhancing with smart technology to bring more people in and getting competitive grants with Verizon 5g broadband and electric cars. Kevin Quinn says yes that would qualify. Dave Hugg asks if funds from American Rescue Plan be able to use as match. Kevin Quinn says the guidelines for that money has not come out, yet he would have to check with his legal team. Mr. Suchodolski states their lawyers are currently looking at that and reaching out to treasury. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING UPDATE GIVEN BY DAVE HUGG Dave Hugg advises we took advantage and submitted seven projects through Congressional Authorization Procreations Process some would qualify for EDA funding mostly infrastructure projects. Also, submitted four projects to Representative Blunt Rochester for community projects including two planning projects if we cannot get funded otherwise. Waiting for guidelines from US Treasury of American Rescue Plan should be on or around May 10. MAYORS ANNOUNCMENT Next meeting will have a guest speaker thanks to Councilman Anderson will give insight on new directions we can go. NEXT MEETING DATE May 11, 2021 at 4:00 PM via ZOOM ADJOURNMANT Mayor Robin R. Christiansen called for a motion to adjourn. Councilman Anderson moved for adjournment, seconded by Diane Laird, unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned 5:00PM. Page 144

Attachment 1 Item #5. Page 145

Attachment 1 Item #5. EDA Contacts for Delaware Linda Cruz-Carnall, Regional Director, Philadelphia Regional Office Marguerite McGinley, Area Director-Investment Development Team, Philadelphia Regional Office Kevin F. Quinn Economic Development Specialist, Investment Development Team Economic Development Representative-Delaware, Philadelphia Regional Office 202-695-6280 Matthew Suchodolski Management Analyst-Economic Development Integration, Philadelphia Regional Office (215) 316-2472 + https://eda.gov/contact Page 146

Attachment 1 Item #5. Philadelphia Regional Office Philadelphia Regional Office: CT, DE, DC, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, VA, WV, PR, VI + https://eda.gov/contact Page 147

Attachment 1 Item #5. EDA’S MISSION To lead the federal economic development agenda by promoting innovation and competitiveness, preparing American regions for growth and success in the worldwide economy The U.S. Economic Development Administration's investment policy is designed to establish a foundation for sustainable job growth and the building of durable regional economies throughout the United States This foundation builds upon two key economic drivers - innovation and regional collaboration. Innovation is key to global competitiveness, new and better jobs, a resilient economy, and the attainment of national economic goals Regional collaboration is essential for economic recovery because regions are the centers of competition in the new global economy and those that work together to leverage resources and use their strengths to overcome weaknesses will fare better than those that do not EDA encourages its partners around the country to develop initiatives that advance new ideas and creative approaches to address rapidly evolving economic conditions Page 148

Attachment 1 Item #5. A HEALTHY ECOSYSTEM the hierarchy of community needs incubators universities & labs accelerators HEALTHY commercialization capital ECOSYSTEM capital people & culture INNOVATION ENGINES people & culture BUSINESS SUPPORT broadband transportation cellular utilities people & culture wireless TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE people & culture BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE people & culture Page 149

Attachment 1 Item #5. EDA PROGRAMS Planning Supports local organizations (Economic Development Districts, Indian Tribes, and other eligible areas) with short and long-term planning efforts. The Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) Content Guidelines, provides suggestions, tools, and resources for developing comprehensive economic development strategies. Public Works Empowers distressed communities to revitalize, expand, and upgrade their physical infrastructure to attract new industry, encourage business expansion, diversify local economies, and generate or retain long-term, private sector jobs and investment. Economic Adjustment Assists state and local interests in designing and implementing strategies to adjust or bring about change to an economy. The program focuses on areas that have experienced or are under threat of serious structural damage to the underlying economic base. Under Economic Adjustment, EDA administers its Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) Program, which supplies small businesses and entrepreneurs with the gap financing needed to start or expand their business. Local Technical Assistance Helps fill the knowledge and information gaps that may prevent leaders in the public and nonprofit sectors in distressed areas from making optimal decisions on local economic development issues. University Centers A partnership of the federal government and academia that makes the varied and vast resources of universities available to Page 150 the economic development community.

Attachment 1 Item #5. EDA PROGRAMS Build to Scale (formerly known as Regional Innovation Strategies) The Build to Scale (B2S) Program builds regional economies through scalable startups and includes three competitions supporting entrepreneurship, acceleration of company growth and increased access to risk capital across regional economies. Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms A national network of 11 Trade Adjustment Assistance Centers to help strengthen the competitiveness of American companies that have lost domestic sales and employment because of increased imports of similar goods and services. Research and National Technical Assistance Supports research of leading edge, world class economic development practices and information dissemination efforts. Economic Development Integration EDA possesses broad and deep experience in successfully coordinating resources across multiple programs and special initiatives. Based upon this experience and EDA’s historic track record of successful collaboration with a range of stakeholders (both federal and non-federal), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has designated EDA to lead the federal government’s efforts to maximize the integration of economic development resources from all sources, including federal, state, local and philanthropic, to achieve more impactful and sustainable outcomes for communities across America. Page 151

Attachment 1 Item #5. Planning Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) -Contributes to effective economic development in America’s communities & regions through a locally-based, regionally-driven economic development planning process -Economic development planning through the CEDS is the cornerstone of EDA’s programs -Successfully serves to engage community leaders, leverage the involvement of the private sector, and establish a strategic blueprint for regional collaboration -The CEDS provides the capacity-building foundation by which the public sector, working in conjunction with other economic actors (individuals, firms, industries), creates the environment for regional economic prosperity Page 152

Attachment 1 Item #5. EDA’s Investment Priorities 1. Recovery & Resilience: Projects that assist with economic resilience (including business continuity and preparedness) and long-term recovery from natural disasters and economic shocks to ensure U.S. communities are globally competitive. 2. Critical Infrastructure: Projects that establish the fundamental building blocks of a prosperous and innovation-centric economy and a secure platform for American business, including physical (e.g., broadband, energy, roads, water, sewer) and other economic infrastructure. Page 153

Attachment 1 Item #5. EDA’s Investment Priorities 3. Workforce Development & Manufacturing: Projects that support the planning and implementation of infrastructure for skills-training centers and related facilities that address the hiring needs of the business community -- particularly in the manufacturing sector -- with a specific emphasis on the expansion of apprenticeships and work-and-learn training models. Also includes projects that encourage job creation and business expansion in manufacturing, including infrastructure-related efforts that focus on advanced manufacturing of innovative, high-value products and enhancing manufacturing supply chains. 4. Exports & FDI: Primarily infrastructure projects that enhance community assets (e.g., port facilities) to support growth in U.S. exports and increased foreign direct investment—and ultimately the return of jobs to the United States. Page 154

Attachment 1 Item #5. EDA’s Investment Priorities 5. Opportunity Zones: Planning and implementation projects aimed at attracting private investment – including from Opportunity Funds – to grow businesses and create jobs in Census tracts that have been designated as Opportunity Zones. This includes targeted projects located within an Opportunity Zone; projects that, while not located within an Opportunity Zone, have a clear intent of benefitting nearby Opportunity Zone(s); and regional projects that encompass an area containing at least one Opportunity Zone with a clear intent of benefitting that Opportunity Zone. Opportunity Zones are designed to spur economic development by providing tax benefits to investors. For more information on Opportunity Zones and Opportunity Funds, see https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/opportunity-zones-frequently- asked-questions. Page 155

Attachment 1 Item #5. ELIGIBILITY Who is eligible to apply? • Eligible applicants must be a state, a political subdivision of a state, district organization, Indian tribe, institution of higher education, or a non-profit acting in coordination with a political subdivision of a state. Page 156

Attachment 1 Item #5. ELIGIBILITY What criteria and requirements must be met to apply? Certain economic distress criteria must be met (for Public Works or Economic Adjustment investments): An unemployment rate that is, for the most recent twenty-four (24) month period of which data is available at least one (1) percent greater than the national average unemployment rate; or Per capita income that is, for the most recent period for which data is available, eighty (80) percent or less of the national average per capita income; or A “Special Need" (certain unemployment or economic adjustment problems) as determined by EDA. Proposals must be based on a locally developed comprehensive economic development strategy or equivalent document (for Public Works or Economic Adjustment investments). Cost sharing or matching is required; generally, the amount of the EDA investment may not exceed fifty (50) percent of the total cost of the project. Page 157

Attachment 1 Item #5. Where Do You Apply? • Proposals and applications must be submitted to http://www.grants.gov/ or to the appropriate EDA regional office. • For more information on EDA Federal Funding Opportunities, visit http://www.eda.gov/fundingopportunities/index.htm Page 158

Attachment 1 Item #5. When Can You Apply? • EDA accepts applications at any point and will work closely with applicants to provide feedback and responses on funding decision in a timely manner. In addition, EDA accepts project proposals before requiring full applications. Page 159

Attachment 1 Item #5. How Are Proposals Evaluated? • Proposals are evaluated based on certain investment policy guidelines and funding priority considerations. For more information on EDA's application requirements and criteria, please visit our web site at www.eda.gov Page 160

Attachment 1 Item #5. Previous Investments: In FY 2018, EDA awarded $1.9 million in Public Works funds to Delaware Technical Community College for the construction of the Automotive Center of Excellence (COE), an automotive and diesel mechanic training facility. The new facility will allow the college to provide certification in this specialized automotive field to address the critical need for diesel mechanics in the area. With this investment, DTCC has committed to create 43 new jobs as well as save 44 jobs with an estimated private investment of $1.5 million. In addition, the Automotive Center of Excellence created new opportunities for diesel and automotive-related businesses in the region, which will create more high skilled jobs. Businesses in the region have shown their support for the project through financial and job commitments. Page 161

Attachment 1 Item #5. Previous Investments: In FY21 EDA Awarded the Delaware Division of Small Business a $1,500,000 Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) to alleviate sudden and severe economic dislocation caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, to provide permanent resources to support economic resiliency, and to further the long-term economic adjustment objectives of the region served by this Award. This recently funded EDA investment will provide access to capital for small businesses that suffered economic injury as a result of COVID-19 across the entire State of Delaware, within each of the 3 counties (New Castle, Kent & Sussex) and including all 25 Qualified Opportunity Zones which includes rural as well as urban communities and main street commercial corridors that were severely impacted by mandatory shut- down under the Public Health State of Emergency and Presidential Disaster Declaration. Page 162

Attachment 1 Item #5. Delaware State University: University Center for Economic Development and Trade Director- Michael H. Casson Jr., PhD Page 163

Attachment 1 Item #5. EDA Website EDA Website: https://www.eda.gov/ -About EDA -Funding Opportunities -Programs -Success Stories -Resources -Newsroom (Press Releases) -EDA Contacts (All Regions and Headquarters) Page 164

Attachment 1 Item #5. TOOLS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IDENTIFY LEVELS OF DISTRESS: StatsAmerica: Measuring Distress – A Resource for EDA Stakeholders DEVELOP A STRATEGIC PLAN: Know Your Region: A Template for Future Prosperity CEDS Content Guidelines The CEDS Content Guidelines provide practical recommendations about the content and format of a CEDS that will result in an engaging, technically-sound strategy for guiding regional development. BUILDING THE REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM AND IDENTIFYING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: Page 165 Identifying Regional Clusters

Attachment 1 Item #5. TOOLS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) Calculating Innovation Capacity The new Innovation Index 2.0, created by the Indiana Business Research Center, provides practitioners an easy-to-compare method of assessing the innovation capacity of their region by providing the composite index of innovation inputs and outputs built upon data from five areas: human capital, business dynamics, business profile, employment and productivity, and economic well-being. Identifying and Supporting Venture Development Organizations Created by the State Science and Technology Institute, the Regional Innovation Accelerator Network (RIAN) is designed to help identify existing venture development organizations (VDOs) and relevant best practices that VDOs can implement to advance economic development objectives. Page 166

Attachment 1 Item #5. TOOLS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) Investment Analysis This tool, created by Purdue University and the Indiana Business Research Center, provides practitioners tools to assist them in prioritizing projects. INCUBATOR MANAGEMENT BEST PRACTICES Benchmark Your Incubator Management Practices and Access Tools for Continuous Improvement Dedicated incubation professionals are always looking for ways to enhance their program's effectiveness and efficiency. This online tool, developed by the University of Michigan and based on research funded by EDA, provides incubator managers with the input they need to do just that. Page 167

Attachment 1 Item #5. EDA CARES ACT RECOVERY ASSISTANCE The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act provides the Economic Development Administration (EDA) with $1.5 billion for economic development assistance programs to help communities prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. EDA CARES Act Recovery Assistance, which is being administered under the authority of the bureau’s flexible Economic Adjustment Assistance (EAA) (PDF) program, provides a wide-range of financial assistance to communities and regions as they respond to and recover from the impacts of the pandemic. EDA’s CARES Act Recovery Assistance funding is made available with the announcement that EDA had published an Addendum to its FY 2020 Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Notice of Funding Opportunity. EDA intends to deploy its CARES Act funding as quickly, effectively, and efficiently as possible, and in a manner that meets communities needs. Page 168

Attachment 1 Item #5. Delaware Department of State https://sos.delaware.gov/ Delaware Economic Development Authority https://business.delaware.gov/delaware- economic-development-authority/ Delaware Opportunity Zones https://business.delaware.gov/opportunit y-zones/ Page 169

Attachment 1 Item #5. Delaware CEDS STATE OF DELAWARE’S COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (CEDS) was updated on 4/20/2020 https://business.delaware.gov/wp- content/uploads/sites/118/2020/04/CEDS-2020.pdf Page 170

Attachment 1 Item #5. Questions? Page 171

Attachment 1 Item #5. Contact Information: Kevin F. Quinn Economic Development Specialist, Investment Development Team Economic Development Representative-Delaware, Philadelphia Regional Office 202-695-6280 kquinn@eda.gov Page 172

Attachment 1 Item #5. Page 173

Item #6. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE The Council Committee of the Whole Meeting was held by video conference on June 15, 2021 at 6:00 p.m., with Council President Sudler presiding. Members of Council present via video or telephone were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Neil, Mr. Hare, Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Rocha, Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Lindell. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Contant and Mr. Shevock (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Chairman Anderson presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Anderson requested the agenda be amended by moving Item# 6 - Presentation - Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) Master Plan to be considered first. Mr. Sudler moved for adoption of the agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Presentation - Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) Master Plan (Diane Laird, Executive Director, DDP) Ms. Diane Laird, Executive Director, DDP, reviewed the Downtown Dover Partnership Master Plan presentation. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Laird stated that considering the current workforce, the potential workforce gain from DSU locating downtown would be a key factor in a successful outcome, not only for entrepreneurial types that want to open small businesses, but all for other professional businesses that may arise. Mr. Neil suggested that the Downtown Dover Partnership consider including the Riverwalk previously proposed by Mr. Taylor as a part of the plan. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Ms. Laird stated that they had not sought funding from private industry or a public private collaborative. She stated that she tried to keep things condensed while looking at the plans but there was no reason not to consider private sources or public private sources in addition to the non-profit sources if they need the funding. Ms. Laird stated that it was something she would consider. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Ms. Laird stated that Delaware State University would be engaged in the visioning, planning, and exploration of investment in how the campus would engage with the whole master plan. She stated that how their involvement in terms of funding correlated to the rest of the community was worth exploring. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Laird stated that part of the plan should be assessing where a campus of social services could be located or if it should be spread out. Page 174

Item #6. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 15, 2021 PAGE 2 Evaluation of Bids - Fiscal Year 2021B Street and Alley Program (Sharon Duca, Public Works Director) Ms. Sharon Duca, Public Works Director, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the evaluation of bids for the Fiscal Year 2021B Street and Alley Program. Staff recommended awarding the contract to Grassbuster’s Landscaping Company, Inc. for the City of Dover Fiscal Year 2021B Street and Alley Program, Bid #21-0039PW, for the amount of $381,083. Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Ms. Duca stated that she could get information on the cost overrun by dollar amount and percentage as compared to what was proposed for previous bids that Grassbuster’s Landscaping Company, Inc. had been awarded. Mr. Boggerty suggested that going forward it may be beneficial to include whether a company had previously done work for the City and what the percentage of their overruns was in the bid and RFP packages. Mr. Matt Harline, Interim City Manager, stated that if the City included performance measures it would need to be in a system so it can be applied equally. He stated that if this information would be used to penalize companies there needed to be good metrics. Responding to Mr. Neil, Ms. Duca stated that in terms of performance, Grassbuster’s had done a good job on various projects in the past and had completed jobs on time as well. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Ms. Duca stated that Stevenson Drive was part of the 2021 street program that was accepted by Council the night before so the plan was to have Stevenson Drive done first. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Ms. Duca stated that Public Works was trying to work on a phased in plan that would leave a significant number of trees in place by trying to work around them. She stated that they were working through that with a contractor for the 2020 program and it would come back to committee for review once they received further information on the cost and were able to ensure the ability to not disturb the trees as a part of the project. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Ms. Duca stated that as long as everything worked out with the contractor and the equipment they should be able to pave the road surface before cold weather settled in. She advised that some of the issues that would take more time were the sidewalks on the other side of the trees due to the need to develop the possibilities for routing around them and the need for various public involvement as it could affect homeowner’s properties. Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation to award the contract to Grassbuster’s Landscaping Company, Inc., for the City of Dover Fiscal Year 2021B Street and Alley Program. The motion was seconded by Mr. Taylor and unanimously carried. Elimination of the City Assessor’s Position (Cheryl Bundek, City Assessor) Mrs. Cheryl Bundek, City Assessor, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the elimination of the City Assessor’s position. Page 175

Item #6. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 15, 2021 PAGE 3 Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mrs. Bundek stated that her biggest con for eliminating the assessor position would be the loss of a position in the department, the pro would be the cost savings to the City which would be the case if they awarded the job to the contractor or if they chose to go with the County. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mrs. Bundek stated that Human Resources was looking for a position for the employee whose position would be eliminated if the assessor’s position was eliminated and that the employee was looking at and applying for the open positions within the City. Responding to Mr. Neil, Mrs. Bundek stated that if Kent County had the revaluation, Tyler was doing that revaluation and had also done the City’s. She advised that if the City did not go with Kent County revaluations, if it chose to go with the Kent County route after the reevaluation was done, it would be in the City’s best interest because the values would be different. Mrs. Bundek noted that even if the City did a valuation in the same year, Kent County was using a different valuation software. She stated that Tyler was going to be using Patriot software, which is what Kent County currently had so there would be a different value probably between the City value and Kent County's value, which could make for appeals for whoever has the highest value between the two properties. Mrs. Bundek stated that it would not make sense to a property owner how the valuation year can be that close and maybe extremely different. She advised that the City would also have to make a judgment call on quality of home and condition of home from an assessor that is working in Kent County versus either an assessor that is working for the City or a contractor that is working for the City. Mrs. Bundek stated that her only concern if the City chose not to go with the county value was that it may incur a lot more appeals because of judgement calls between two different jurisdictions and two different software being used. She noted that the contractor cost right now was not to exceed $59,900 a year. Mayor Christiansen stated that the Assessor’s office had kept current with the assessment values of the properties within the City and he firmly believed that the City should keep the position. He noted that after the end of the Kent County Assessment the City could see if it dovetails with theirs and make the decision then. Mr. Hare noted that the City pays County taxes which covers having property assessed. He stated that he agreed with Mayor Christiansen that the position could stay vacant and be kept available while the City waits to see what the County comes up with before spending the money to do a reassessment. Mr. Sudler stated that he agreed with Mayor Christiansen and he would like to see some type of relief in regards to constituents being hit with County and City taxes simultaneously. Mayor Christiansen stated that in some areas where there is duplication of services, there is a separate service function budget. He noted that it had been considered for the City of Dover and the County over the last forty years. Mayor Christiansen advised that he did not know if it would change but it was something that should be discussed on a regular basis. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Bundek advised that the City had already signed the contract with Tyler Technologies for additional services, so they were at its disposal. She stated that they would not be needed unless asked for any contract work, so the City could use them until a decision is made. Mrs. Bundek advised that if the City’s route was to search for another assessor, they would have to be certified with the Page 176

Item #6. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 15, 2021 PAGE 4 State to be appointed as the assessor to value properties. She stated that the contractor could be utilized in the interim to value any new building permits. Mrs. Bundek stated that she, Mrs. Patricia Marney, Customer Service Director, Mr. Randy Robertson, City Manager, and Mr. Matt Harline, then Assistant City Manager, met with Mr. Mike Petit de Mange, Kent County Administrator, to discuss what the future was with the reevaluation. She advised that it was not in the settlement that the County had to do a reoccurring reassessment like the City does, but Mr. Petit de Mange stated that was what he was proposing. Mrs. Bundek stated that the first City reassessment in 2010 was just short of a million dollars and has since gone down to about one hundred thousand ($100,000) because the properties will be looked at within a five-year period, so a contractor does not have to be hired to look at every property like the whole State has to do right now. Mrs. Bundek advised that the State was going to go out and look at every property again, including the City of Dover properties. She stated that the contractor would get the information from the Planning and Inspections Department via the Tax Assessor’s administrator, they would value the properties and the Tax Assessor’s administrator would do the rest of the leg work. Mrs. Bundek noted that the way it was positioned was for the Tax Assessor’s administrator to go under customer service and be directly supervised by Mrs. Marney. She stated that the contractor would come in and probably just deal with the administrator in that aspect. Mrs. Bundek stated that if the City went with the county valuations the Tax Assessor’s administrator would send the permits to the county, the county would do all the permits and valuation and the City could just do an export. She stated that it was currently $15.00 for each export so it would probably be best to do that four times a year prior to each billing and then bill based on that information. Mrs. Bundek sated that one of the big pros for using Kent County was that there would no longer be a need for a Board of Assessment Appeal because all of the appeals would be sent directly to Kent County, who would handle all appeals to property values. Mr. Harline stated that the information from the Council retreat was used to guide the construction of the 2022 Fiscal Year Budget which did not currently include funds for a new assessor so if Council wanted to hire a new assessor in the next several months there would be a substantial increase in the budget. He stated it was also assumed that the City would be able to find a way to absorb the field assessor if the Tax Assessor position was eliminated so that position would also have to be added back into the budget as well. Responding to Mr. Neil, Mrs. Bundek stated that if the position was kept vacant to see what happened with the County before a decision was made there would be some interim ordinance changes that would need to be made. She noted that Mrs. Marney had an intern in her office that had been working on the senior citizen issue and was willing to work on the ordinance issues as well but the City would need direction on whether the Tax Assessor’s office would remain under Council or go under the City Manager and who would be supervising the one person in that position. Ms. Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer, stated that she was concerned that if the assessor’s position was left vacant rather than removing the department the City would have to budget for those positions. Responding to Ms. Peddicord, Mr. Harline stated that the administrative assistant position for the Tax office was budgeted but the field assessor was not budgeted and the assessor position was only budgeted through Mrs. Bundek’s retirement. He advised that if another assessor was hired the City would be paying retirement costs, the Assessor’s costs, and the field assessor’s position that was not funded because of the increased Page 177

Item #6. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 15, 2021 PAGE 5 Tyler amounts. Mr. Harline noted that if the City did not use Tyler and instead used that position, the amount would be less, however, he did not have the actual costs at the time. Mr. Neil moved to table the discussion and bring it back at the next Council Committee of the Whole meeting with a staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Boggerty and unanimously carried. Discussion of Business License Rates (Matt Harline, Interim City Manager) Mr. Dave Hugg, Planning and Community Development Director, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the City of Dover business license fee structure. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hugg stated that he had not received a lot of feedback from the business community however, due to the deadline, he had not done as much direct one-on-one as he would have liked. He stated that due to the time crunch both he and Mr. Matt Harline, interim City Manager, felt that if the City were to consider raising the fee amounts they should be nominal now and a serious adjustment should come at a later date. Mr. Lindell moved to refer the discussion back to staff for continued work and to report back at a time that was convenient once the appropriate information had been gathered, including talking to the business community as well as any ordinances that may need to be done. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sudler. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Mr. Hugg stated that a 10-10.8% increase would yield about $150,000. He advised that the expected revenues were around $147,000. Mr. Hugg stated that they would go down a little bit in the current fiscal year but were expected to bounce back in the new fiscal year. He noted that with an increase of 10% the proposed dollar amount would be roughly $150,000. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Mr. Hugg stated that the only rush was that license renewals had to be sent out by July 1st so if a change were to be made a notice would need to be included in the license renewal, otherwise the City would need to wait until the same time next year. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Harline stated that because the fees were all in Appendix F there would need to be an amendment to the ordinance. He advised that according to the Code licenses begin on August 1st and if they are not paid by August 31st a fine can be assessed for late payment so a lot of the timing is built into the Code. Mr. Harline stated that it was his understanding that it would need to be moved along pretty quickly. The motion to refer the discussion back to staff for continued work and to report back at a time that was convenient once the appropriate information had been gathered, including talking to the business community as well as any ordinances that may need to be done was unanimously carried. Police Department Executive Compensation (Thomas Johnson, Police Chief) Chief Thomas Johnson reviewed the background and analysis regarding Police Department Executive Compensation. Responding to Mr. Contant, Chief Johnson stated that the Deputy Chief was just below $124,000 and his recommendation was $135,000 which would be an increase of $11,000 for that position. He stated that if Page 178

Item #6. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 15, 2021 PAGE 6 Council was in favor of addressing the shortage in Fiscal Year 2021, his salary would increase from $139,000 to $147,000 which would be an additional $8,000. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Chief Johnson stated that the compression issue was present at the time he was offered the position and was working out the details of his employment. He noted that he was going to be making less than the person he supervised and once he got a better understanding of what the salary landscape was, he requested the City provide him with a mechanism to discuss his salary. Chief Johnson advised that the Mayor was identified as his point of contact for that discussion and they had a meeting in the City prior to him signing the offer letter. He stated that at that time the mayor had a figure and he had a figure, he was trying to create a separation between ranks and a placement in market value in Delaware. Chief Johnson noted that at the time, the mayor was prepared to offer $130,000. He believed it was related to the residual funds in the Fiscal Year 2020 budget because it was a mid-budget year and there was a concern on his end, but the appendix to that conversation was, there would be 7% added in Fiscal Year 2021 to make up the difference in market value which he believed the mayor recognized at the time. Chief Johnson stated that there was some type of communication disconnect internally from the time of that meeting and he discovered the issue later in the year, which was approximately in May. He advised that at that time he was trying to position for the Deputy Chief's promotional process and had two viable candidates. Chief Johnson stated that looking at the compression issue for the published salary for Deputy Chief against where the Captains were as the most recent FOP contract was progressing, he was concerned that there would be a challenge getting one of the captains to accept the position. He advised that during that discussion with the previous City manager, it became clear that they were not aware of the 7% piece of his hire so he began the process of trying to rectify it. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mr. Matt Harline, Interim City Manager, stated that 20 or 25,000 would not be impossible to find if the City did a property tax increase. He noted that if it was closer to a 40 or 50,000 increase total and if the City did not increase property taxes he would advise Council to look at it as a $50,000 expenditure just to be safe in terms of load for retirement, etc. Mr. Harline stated that he had not had a chance to review the information with Ms. Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer. Mr. Harline clarified that the original budget was built with a two and a half percent raise for non-bargaining and to increase that to 3% across the board for the extra half a percent would be a little over $20,000, and when the proposal for the Chief and Deputy Chief are added that is where it becomes $50,000. Mr. Lindell moved to recommend increasing the Deputy Police Chief’s salary to $135,000 and increasing the Police Chief’s salary to $147,000, as recommended by Staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Review of Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Annual Budget (Matt Harline, Interim City Manager) Mr. Matt Harline, Interim City Manager, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Annual Budget. Mr. Harline shared an action form for budget amendment options (Attachment #1). Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mayor Christiansen stated that $50,000 of his economic development budget immediately goes to the Kent Economic Partnership and the rest is used by he and Mr. Hugg, Director of Planning and Community Development for advertisements, site visits, and promotion for the virtues of the City of Dover to generate jobs. Page 179

Item #6. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 15, 2021 PAGE 7 Responding to Mr. Neil, Mr. Harline advised that the City currently had $520,000 of revenue recognized. He stated that he and Ms. Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer, were pretty confident that they could say it was lost revenue directly related to COVID. Mr. Harline noted that they were continuing to review where money could and could not be expended from the COVID monies and they were pretty confident that the direct amount from the federal government for the year would be in the neighborhood of $4.3 million. He stated that he believed the Committee members already knew some of the things they were allowing the City to expend it on were things the City did not usually do but there were some opportunities to use it in things like housing, COVID vaccinations, and things like that. Mr. Harline noted that there was also some money for water and wastewater which he thought could be used but the City had not given up on efforts to secure more funding. He stated that he, Mr. Hugg, and the Mayor had met with the U.S. Treasury Department and representatives from both Senator's offices and their representatives, particularly Senator Carper, but also Senator Coons, who helped bring the Treasury to the table. Mr. Harline advised that they had learned there were possibilities for the City and ways that the City could get more money, but it would have to be through the State or the County. He stated that the other way would be if new legislation were proposed and passed in the U.S. Congress, or if there were some legal decisions saying that distribution was constitutional so basically $520,000 was all that was recognized in the 2022 budget currently. Responding to Mr. Neil, Mr. Harline stated that he was not suggesting that the City spend the other million dollars from the real estate transfer tax on the sale of Dover Downs yet. He advised that he would like to use that million dollars to build the reserve because there were a lot of things that had been cut and he and Ms. Peddicord were not absolutely sure where the City would be at the end of Fiscal Year 2021. Mr. Harline noted that he and Ms. Peddicord would like to go back and re-analyze what the priorities were with all of the departments. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Harline stated that the $50,000 he had referenced for non-bargaining employees was separate from the Segal Water Assessment. He advised that the only thing from the Segal study that was in the budget was the recommendation to bring the supervisor in Grounds, supervisor in Streets, and some other positions up to the minimum according to the market study part of the Segal Assessment. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mr. Harline stated that when the COPS Grant was adopted, the City assumed in its model that there would be a one cent increase in property tax for the current year and another half cent increase in Fiscal Year 2023 to cover the cost for the five additional police officers. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mr. Harline stated that regardless of what is done in the current year between the cameras and other items, the commitment would be up to $664,000 next year. Mr. Sudler stated for the record that Council needed to continue to work on their statesmanship behavior and attitude when conducting the business of the public. Responding to Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Harline stated that if a constituent owned a $250,000 home and the City put a one cent property tax for $100, the cost of the increase would be $25 a year for a $250,000 house. Mrs. Arndt stated that she would ask Council to look at a one cent increase versus a two cent increase. Page 180

Item #6. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 15, 2021 PAGE 8 Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Peddicord stated that there were a lot of unknowns and a lot of cuts being considered. She advised that the cost of a one cent tax increase equated to about $352,000 and a two cent increase equated to about $700,000, which she did not think the tax payers would notice significantly. She stated that she agreed with a lot of the statements being made about not being able to count on one-time money because it was unknown if it would continue and there may be a decrease going forward. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Peddicord stated that the trash fee, water rates, and other increases already built into the budget were the general fund budget, which was different. She stated that there were unknown expenses that were not recognized yet. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Harline stated that purchases were made with the assumption of raising taxes one cent or one and a half cents to cover the cost in Fiscal Year 2022 and 2023. Mr. Rocha moved to move the budget forward as amended by Staff to include a one cent tax increase, to put $25,000 into the Economic Development Budget, and to include the recommendation to have a 3% increase for non-bargaining employees and to have equity with the Chief and Deputy Chief’s positions. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sudler and carried by a roll call vote of seven (7) yes (Hare, Arndt, Rocha, Lindell, Sudler, Shevock, Contant), three (3) no (Anderson, Boggerty, Taylor), and one (1) absent (Neil). Mr. Hare moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee meeting, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Mr. Taylor moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:46 p.m. Roy Sudler Jr. Council President RS/MR/tm S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Committee-Minutes\2021\06-15-2021 CCW MINUTES .wpd Attachments Attachment #1 - Budget Amendment Options Action Form Page 181

ATTACHMENT #1 Council Committee of the Whole Meeting of 06/15/2021 Item #6. ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole - Legislative, Finance & Administration DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Manager DATE SUBMITTED: 6/15/21 PREPARED BY: Matthew Harline, Interim City Manager SUBJECT: Budget Amendment Options REVIEWED BY: Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer APPROVALS: Council Committee of the Whole EXHIBITS: None EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: n/a AMOUNT BUDGETED: TBD TIMETABLE: Upon Council approval of the FY2021 – 22 Budget RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends approving a minimal Property Tax increase to maintain Public Service levels The proposed budget provided to the City Council on May 27, 2021 for the FY2021/22 Fiscal Year included a proposal for a Property Tax increase of $0.055/$100 of assessed value. At the direction of the City Council possible cuts were proposed totaling $1.9 million, enough to eliminate the $0.055/$100 Property Tax increase. Council recommended cuts totalling enough to allow a balanced budget with a 2-cent property Tax increase. Within the last week the City has learned that a large transfer tax payment has been received - $2,160,000. Council has asked what options the staff recommends for this additional money, including a complete avoidance of a Property Tax increase. On the following page is a spreadsheet/chart with six columns. The first two include the item description and the Department associated with the item. The next four columns are as follows: • Staff cuts: Proposed cuts made by the staff prior to the development of the budget document. • Council cuts: Proposed cuts at the meetings on June 2nd and June 3rd • Spending approved: Items that survived both rounds of cuts • Additional approval(s): Additional reductions in revenue if Council recommends removing the $0.02 tax increase and/or suggest other operational expenditures, or capital expenditures to be earmarked with the receipt of the $2million transfer tax. Keep in mind FY22 costs for the five additional officers plus tasers & body cameras will cost the City $379,800 in excess of the COPS grant revenues, and City share in FY2022/23 will be $664,500 (a $285,000 increase from FY22/FY23). The budget reductions requested at the June 2- 3 work sessions reduce the General Fund capital expenditures from $6.37 million to $5.17 million, and the additional transfer of $1 million from the Electric Fund is still in place. Moreover, the final cost to the General Fund for the Tropical Storm Isaias that are not covered by FEMA are in the range of $120,000. The final FY2021 budget balance estimate, is less certain this year than in past years. Staff strongly discourages adding more than half of the $2.1million transfer tax receipt to the proposed FY22 beginning budget balance. Page 182

Item #6. Action Form 15 June 2021 - CCW Proposed Budget Amendments Available to spend $ 355,500 Spending Additional Description Department Staff Cuts Council cuts approved approved $ (765,000.00) $ (1,774,100.00) $ 786,000 No Property Tax Increase $ 704,000 3% (v. 2,5%) NB raise $ 20,500 Moving Expense City Manager $ 20,000 Legal Expenses City Manager 50,000 Special Projects HR 50,000 25% Economic Development Mayor 25,000 Delete van replacement Recreation 31,000 Delete 2 FTE Customer Service $ 97,800 LAN Analyst deleted IT 37,500 Subtotal Admin/Rec $ 273,800.00 Reduce inc to Fire Fire 1,000 50% buffer for Ambulance Contract Life Safety 10,000 Knox Box Update Life Safety 23,200 2 Trucks Code Enforcement 50,300 40% cut Demolition Code Enforcement 100,000 Defer hiring 4 officers 6 mos Police 199,000 OT and Ed Asst Police 75,000 Tahoe Police 62,600 Subtotal Public Safety $ 322,100.00 Remote Access Facilities Maint. 25,000 City Hall Improvements Facilities Maint. 50,000 Craftsperson (2nd additional) Facilities Maint. 59,000 Craftsperson defer 6 mos Facilities Maint. 29,500 Warehouse Improvements Procurement & Inv 90,000 River Road (MLK - US13) Streets 380,000 Townshend (US13 - End) Streets 421,500 Kent Ave N Alley Streets 7,500 Kent Ave S Alley Streets 9,000 Asphalt Hot Box Streets 43,000 Replace 2000 Backhoe Streets 125,000 Replace2001 Dump Truck Streets 156,000 Cyclomedia Software Streets 48,000 Replace Automated Truck Sanitation 290,400 Replace Vac Truck Stormwater 364,000 Mirror Lake Drainage Basin Stormwater 350,000 Reduce Mulch Process Costs Stormwater 44,800 Subtotal Public Works/City Buildings $ 1,943,200.00 pg. 2 Page 183

Item #16. FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 2 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Fifty-Two Million Two Hundred Seventy-Six Thousand One 3 Hundred dollars ($52,276,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 4 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 5 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 6 GENERAL FUND 7 CASH RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR 2021-2022 8 2020/21 2021/22 9 REVISED BUDGET 10 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 5,813,100 $ 5,546,400 11 RECEIPTS 12 FINES AND POLICE REVENUE 572,800 630,300 13 LIBRARY REVENUES 123,400 142,100 14 KENT COUNTY BOOK REIMBURSEMENT 245,000 250,000 15 BUSINESS LICENSES 1,470,000 1,500,000 16 PERMITS AND OTHER FEES 1,446,000 1,400,000 17 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 30,000 10,000 18 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 595,000 370,000 19 PROPERTY TAXES 14,885,800 15,267,700 20 RECREATION REVENUE 135,000 110,000 21 FRANCHISE FEE 645,000 600,000 22 SANITATION FEES 3,090,600 3,421,000 23 RENT REVENUE - GARRISON FARM 105,000 105,000 24 COURT OF CHANCERY FEES 1,440,000 1,400,000 25 INVESTMENT INCOME 140,000 90,000 26 RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 24,923,600 25,296,100 27 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS 28 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS GENERAL GOV 1,370,700 1,337,200 29 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS PUBLIC WORKS 782,000 617,000 30 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS CENT SRVCS 842,100 835,700 31 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS FIN ADMIN 2,597,900 2,536,300 32 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 5,592,700 5,326,200 33 GRANTS: 34 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 155,000 130,000 35 POLICE GRANTS FUND - 308,900 36 POLICE PENSION GRANT 500,000 500,000 37 GREEN ENERGY GRANT 98,500 98,500 38 MISC GRANT REVENUE 102,274 520,000 39 GRANTS SUBTOTAL 855,774 1,557,400 40 TRANSFERS FROM: 41 TRANSFER TAX 1,433,500 1,400,000 42 MUNICIPAL STREET AID 750,000 750,000 43 CIVIL TRAFFIC PENALTIES 445,000 400,000 44 WATER/WASTEWATER 1,000,000 1,000,000 45 ELECTRIC 10,000,000 11,000,000 46 TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL 13,628,500 14,550,000 47 TOTAL REVENUES 45,000,574 46,729,700 48 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE & REVENUE $ 50,813,674 $ 52,276,100 Page 184 1

Item #16. FINAL READING 49 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES 50 GENERAL FUND - EXPENDITURES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2021-2022 51 2019/20 2021/22 52 DEPARTMENT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 53 CITY CLERK $ 511,891 $ 535,800 54 COUNCIL 156,600 157,200 55 TAX ASSESSOR 238,400 263,800 56 PLANNING 658,300 642,000 57 CITY MANAGER 1,004,800 920,100 58 HUMAN RESOURCES 529,200 600,200 59 MAYOR 221,700 222,800 60 FIRE 769,900 797,200 61 LIFE SAFETY 434,974 472,300 62 CODE ENFORCEMENT 815,000 654,100 63 INSPECTIONS 595,300 651,200 64 POLICE 17,819,900 18,544,700 65 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 750,000 500,000 66 PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION 603,400 587,200 67 STREETS 697,700 636,000 68 SANITATION 2,502,425 2,564,800 69 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 1,456,600 1,487,500 70 STORMWATER 682,900 774,100 71 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 655,800 837,000 72 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 294,900 181,100 73 LIBRARY 1,822,700 1,859,900 74 RECREATION 1,129,700 1,191,500 75 PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY 730,284 738,600 76 FLEET MAINTENANCE 924,600 906,500 77 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 912,800 738,500 78 FINANCE 992,700 932,100 79 CUSTOMER SERVICE 1,107,600 1,048,300 80 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTALS 39,020,074 39,444,500 81 OTHER EXPENSES 82 DEBT SERVICE 462,200 632,000 83 CONTRIBUTION TO DDP 150,000 150,000 84 MISCELLANEOUS GRANT RELATED EXP 100,000 - 85 INSURANCE 835,000 1,050,000 86 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 2,045,400 2,156,000 87 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 27,000 30,000 88 UNCOLLECTIBLES - TRASH AND OTHER 100,000 - 89 STREET LIGHTS 815,000 800,000 90 OTHER EXPENSE SUBTOTAL 4,534,600 4,818,000 91 TRANSFERS 92 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND - PROJECTS 2,083,000 3,025,900 93 APPROP. TO THE POLICE PENSION FUND 435,100 435,100 94 APPROP. POLICE PENSION - STATE GRANT 500,000 500,000 95 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC FUND (ERP) - 25,000 96 TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL 3,018,100 3,961,000 97 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 46,572,774 48,223,500 98 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 4,240,900 4,052,600 99 TOTALS $ 50,813,674 $ 52,276,100 100 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 101 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 102 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 185 2

Item #16. FINAL READING 103 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 104 GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 105 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 106 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 107 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Million Three Hundred Forty-Four Thousand Two Hundred 108 dollars ($8,344,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 109 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 110 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 111 REVENUES 112 2020/21 2021/22 113 REVISED BUDGET 114 BEGINNING BALANCE - PROJECTS $ 3,387,600 $ 3,331,500 115 REVENUES 116 STATE GRANTS - Other 1,440,000 1,333,000 117 POLICE GRANTS - 23,800 118 BUDGET BOND/BANK PROCEEDS 1,498,300 - 119 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 2,083,000 3,025,900 120 TRANSFER FROM PARKLAND RESERVE - 490,000 121 TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 346,400 140,000 122 SUBTOTAL PROJECT RECEIPTS 5,367,700 5,012,700 123 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 5,367,700 5,012,700 124 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE AND REVENUES $ 8,755,300 $ 8,344,200 125 EXPENSE SUMMARY 126 2020/21 2021/22 127 EXPENDITURES REVISED BUDGET 128 FIRE $ 173,300 $ 250,300 129 GROUNDS - 125,000 130 LIBRARY 19,900 25,000 131 RECREATION 904,000 756,000 132 LIFE SAFETY 67,500 - 133 CODE ENFORCEMENT 37,800 50,300 134 PLANNING 20,400 - 135 INSPECTIONS 23,500 25,100 136 POLICE 986,800 526,000 137 STREETS 3,209,400 506,000 138 STORMWATER 1,342,200 2,546,200 139 SANITATION 475,200 166,200 140 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 61,600 36,600 141 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 700,000 - 142 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 39,600 - 143 PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY 325,000 - 144 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTAL 8,386,200 5,012,700 145 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,386,200 5,012,700 146 BUDGET BALANCE 369,100 3,331,500 147 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCE & EXPENDITURES $ 8,755,300 $ 8,344,200 148 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 149 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 150 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 186 3

Item #16. FINAL READING 151 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 152 GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY 153 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 154 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 155 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand dollars ($788,000) 156 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the 157 use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending 158 June 30, 2022: 159 CASH RECEIPTS 160 2020/21 2021/22 161 REVISED BUDGET 162 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 773,000 $ 775,000 163 INTEREST EARNED 2,000 13,000 164 TOTALS $ 775,000 $ 788,000 165 EXPENSE SUMMARY 166 2020/21 2021/22 167 REVISED BUDGET 168 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR $ 775,000 $ 788,000 169 TOTALS $ 775,000 $ 788,000 170 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 171 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 172 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 187 4

Item #16. FINAL READING 173 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 174 GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 175 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 176 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 177 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Fourteen Thousand One Hundred dollars 178 ($1,014,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 179 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 180 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 181 CASH RECEIPTS 182 2020/21 2021/22 183 REVISED BUDGET 184 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 1,139,300 $ 999,300 185 INTEREST EARNINGS 14,800 14,800 186 TOTALS $ 1,154,100 $ 1,014,100 187 EXPENSE SUMMARY 188 2020/21 2019/20 189 REVISED BUDGET 190 TRANSFER TO GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 154,800 $ 140,000 191 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 999,300 874,100 192 TOTALS $ 1,154,100 $ 1,014,100 193 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 194 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 195 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 188 5

Item #16. FINAL READING 196 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 197 PARKLAND/RECREATION RESERVE 198 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 199 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 200 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Sixty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred dollars 201 ($867,500) much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 202 funds for the use other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 203 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 204 OPERATING REVENUES 205 2020/21 2021/22 206 REVISED BUDGET 207 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 44,500 $ 831,500 208 STATE AID/GRANT 1,310,000 $ 33,000 209 MISCELANEOUS RECEIPTS 210 INTEREST EARNINGS 3,000 3,000 211 TOTALS $ 1,357,500 $ 867,500 212 OPERATING EXPENSES 213 2020/21 2021/22 214 REVISED BUDGET 215 TRANSFER TO GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 526,000 $ 490,000 216 TRANSFER TO GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUND - - 217 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 831,500 377,500 218 TOTALS $ 1,357,500 $ 867,500 219 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 220 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 221 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 189 6

Item #16. FINAL READING 222 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 223 WATER FUND 224 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 225 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 226 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven MillionNine Hundred Ninety-One Thousand One 227 Hundred dollars ($7,991,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 228 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 229 the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 230 2020/21 2021/22 231 REVISED BUDGET 232 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 1,218,900 $ 642,000 233 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,218,900 642,000 234 BASE REVENUE 235 STATE GRANT 71,800 - 236 WATER SERVICES 6,231,700 6,353,800 237 WATER TANK SPACE LEASING 420,100 436,700 238 WATER IMPACT FEES 570,000 420,000 239 INTEREST - WATER 34,000 34,000 240 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE 67,800 104,600 241 TOTAL REVENUES 7,395,400 7,349,100 242 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES AND REVENUES $ 8,614,300 $ 7,991,100 Page 190 7

Item #16. FINAL READING 243 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES 244 WATER FUND - EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2021-2022 245 2020/21 2021/22 246 DIRECT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 247 ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ 441,400 $ 294,400 248 WATER DEPARTMENT 669,800 676,300 249 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 2,066,300 2,370,600 250 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL 3,177,500 3,341,300 251 OTHER EXPENSES 252 DEBT SERVICE - WATER 762,800 762,800 253 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 176,900 192,000 254 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 1,033,200 964,700 255 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 20,000 27,000 256 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 1,992,900 1,946,500 257 TRANSFER TO: 258 GENERAL FUND FROM WATER 500,000 500,000 259 WATER IMP AND EXT 1,455,300 1,148,600 260 ELECTRIC IMP AND EXT - 25,000 261 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 1,955,300 1,673,600 262 TOTAL EXPENSES 7,125,700 6,961,400 263 BUDGET BALANCES 264 BUDGET BALANCE WATER 1,488,600 1,029,700 265 BUDGET BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,488,600 1,029,700 266 TOTAL CURRENT YEAR BALANCES AND EXPENSES $ 8,614,300 $ 7,991,100 267 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 268 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 269 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 191 8

Item #16. FINAL READING 270 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 271 WASTEWATER FUND 272 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 273 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 274 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Twelve Million One Hundred Forty-Two Thousand Eight 275 Hundred dollars ($12,142,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 276 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 277 the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 278 2020/21 2021/22 279 REVISED BUDGET 280 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 47,900 1,672,200 281 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 47,900 1,672,200 282 BASE REVENUE 283 WASTEWATER SERVICES 4,467,500 4,709,500 284 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICES 3,275,100 3,275,100 285 GROUNDWATER INFLOW ADJUSTMENT 2,040,400 2,023,100 286 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES 480,000 380,000 287 STATE GRANT - WASTEWATER - 62,700 288 INTEREST - WASTEWATER 20,000 20,000 289 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE 1,300 200 290 TOTAL REVENUES 10,284,300 10,470,600 291 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES AND REVENUES $ 10,332,200 $ 12,142,800 Page 192 9

Item #16. FINAL READING 292 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES 293 WASTEWATER FUND - EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2021-2022 294 2020/21 2021/22 295 DIRECT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 296 ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ 288,300 $ 393,700 297 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 1,144,200 1,112,500 298 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL 1,432,500 1,506,200 299 OTHER EXPENSES 300 DEBT SERVICE - WASTEWATER 659,900 659,900 301 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 81,500 93,000 302 KENT COUNTY TREATMENT CHARGE 4,302,900 4,302,900 303 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 782,000 733,000 304 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 10,000 12,000 305 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 5,836,300 5,800,800 306 TRANSFER TO: 307 GENERAL FUND FROM WASTEWATER 500,000 500,000 308 WASTEWATER IMP AND EXT 1,200,000 799,200 ELETRIC FUND (ERP) - 25,000 309 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 1,700,000 1,324,200 310 TOTAL EXPENSES 8,966,400 8,631,200 311 BUDGET BALANCES 312 BUDGET BALANCE WASTEWATER 1,363,400 3,511,600 313 BUDGET BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,365,800 3,511,600 314 TOTAL CURRENT YEAR BALANCES AND EXPENSES $ 10,332,200 $ 12,142,800 315 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 316 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 317 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 193 10

Item #16. FINAL READING 318 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 319 WATER IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION FUND 320 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 321 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 322 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Six Million Eight Hundred Two Thousand Five 323 hundred dollars ($6,802,500) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 324 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Governmentr 325 for the fiscal year begining July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 326 CASH RECEIPTS 327 2020/21 2021/22 328 REVISED BUDGET 329 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 4,618,200 $ 4,896,200 330 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 4,618,200 4,896,200 331 REVENUES 332 TRANS FR OPERATING FUND - WATER 1,455,300 1,148,600 333 TRANSFER FR WATER IMPACT FEE 70,100 707,700 334 INTEREST INCOME 50,000 50,000 335 TOTAL REVENUES 1,575,400 1,906,300 336 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES & REVENUES $ 6,193,600 $ 6,802,500 337 EXPENSE SUMMARY 338 2020/21 2021/22 339 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 340 ENGINEERING $ 20,400 $ - 341 WATER 1,647,200 1,729,000 342 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 568,500 177,300 343 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,236,100 1,906,300 344 BUDGET BALANCE - WATER 3,957,500 4,896,200 345 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 3,957,500 4,896,200 346 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCES & EXPENSES $ 6,193,600 $ 6,802,500 347 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 348 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 349 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 194 11

Item #16. FINAL READING 350 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 351 WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION FUND 352 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 353 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 354 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Seven Hundred Twenty-Three Thousand 355 Nine hundred dollars ($1,723,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated 356 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 357 from the fiscal year begining July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 358 CASH RECEIPTS 359 2020/21 2021/22 360 REVISED BUDGET 361 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 1,243,700 $ 892,700 362 REVENUES 363 STATE LOAN FUND - WASTEWATER 578,600 - 364 TRANS FR OPERATING FUND - WW 1,200,000 799,200 365 TRANSFER FR WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE 31,600 22,000 366 INTEREST INCOME 10,000 10,000 367 TOTAL REVENUES 1,820,200 831,200 368 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES & REVENUES $ 3,063,900 $ 1,723,900 369 EXPENSE SUMMARY 370 2020/21 2021/22 371 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 372 ENGINEERING $ 14,000 $ - 373 WASTEWATER 2,665,200 831,200 374 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,679,200 831,200 375 BUDGET BALANCE - WASTEWATER 384,700 892,700 376 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 384,700 892,700 377 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCES & EXPENSES $ 3,063,900 $ 1,723,900 378 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 379 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 380 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 195 12

Item #16. FINAL READING 381 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 382 WATER CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 383 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 384 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 385 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Hundred Fifty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred dollars 386 ($554,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 387 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 388 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 389 CASH RECEIPTS 390 2020/21 2021/22 391 REVISED BUDGET 392 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 539,600 $ 550,700 393 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 539,600 550,700 394 RECEIPTS 395 INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 4,200 4,200 396 TOTAL RECEIPTS 4,200 4,200 397 TOTALS $ 543,800 $ 554,900 398 EXPENSE SUMMARY 399 2020/21 2021/22 400 REVISED BUDGET 401 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 543,800 $ 554,900 402 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 543,800 554,900 403 TOTALS $ 543,800 $ 554,900 404 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 405 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 406 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 196 13

Item #16. FINAL READING 407 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 408 WASTEWATER CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 409 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 410 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 411 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Ninety-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred dollars 412 ($298,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 413 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 414 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 415 CASH RECEIPTS 416 2020/21 2021/22 417 REVISED BUDGET 418 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 282,800 $ 287,000 419 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 282,800 287,000 420 RECEIPTS 421 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 4,200 11,800 422 TOTAL RECEIPTS 4,200 11,800 423 TOTALS $ 287,000 $ 298,800 424 EXPENSE SUMMARY 425 2020/21 2021/22 426 REVISED BUDGET 427 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 287,000 298,800 428 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 287,000 298,800 429 TOTALS $ 287,000 $ 298,800 430 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 431 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 432 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 197 14

Item #16. FINAL READING 433 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 434 WATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 435 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 436 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 437 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Seven Hundred Ninety-One Thousand Two Hundred 438 dollars ($1,791,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 439 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal 440 year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 441 CASH RECEIPTS 442 2020/21 2021/22 443 REVISED BUDGET 444 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 1,764,800 $ 1,778,000 445 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,764,800 1,778,000 446 RECEIPTS 447 INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 13,200 13,200 448 TOTAL RECEIPTS 13,200 13,200 449 TOTALS $ 1,778,000 $ 1,791,200 450 EXPENSE SUMMARY 451 2020/21 2021/22 452 REVISED BUDGET 453 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 1,778,000 $ 1,791,200 454 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,778,000 1,791,200 455 TOTALS $ 1,778,000 $ 1,791,200 456 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 457 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 458 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 198 15

Item #16. FINAL READING 459 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 460 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 461 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 462 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 463 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Million Six Hundred Seven Thousand dollars 464 ($4,607,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 465 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 466 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 467 CASH RECEIPTS 468 2020/21 2021/22 469 REVISED BUDGET 470 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 4,603,600 $ 4,607,000 471 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 4,603,600 4,607,000 472 RECEIPTS 473 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 35,000 - 474 TOTAL RECEIPTS 35,000 - 475 TOTALS $ 4,638,600 $ 4,607,000 476 EXPENSE SUMMARY 477 2020/21 2021/22 478 REVISED BUDGET 479 TRANSFER TO I & E FUND FROM WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES $ 31,600 $ - 480 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 4,607,000 $ 4,607,000 481 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 4,638,600 4,607,000 482 TOTALS $ 4,638,600 $ 4,607,000 483 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 484 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 485 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 199 16

Item #16. FINAL READING 486 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 487 WATER CONTINGENCY RESERVE 488 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 489 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 490 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand dollars Eight Hundred dollars 491 ($266,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 492 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning 493 July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 494 CASH RECEIPTS 495 2020/21 2021/22 496 REVISED BUDGET 497 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 262,900 $ 264,900 498 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 262,900 264,900 499 RECEIPTS 500 INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 2,000 1,900 501 TOTAL RECEIPTS 2,000 1,900 502 TOTALS $ 264,900 $ 266,800 503 BUDGET SUMMARY 504 2020/21 2021/22 505 REVISED BUDGET 506 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 264,900 $ 266,800 507 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 264,900 266,800 508 TOTAL EXPENSES AND CURRENT YEAR BALANCES $ 264,900 $ 266,800 509 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 510 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 511 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 200 17

Item #16. FINAL READING 512 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 513 WASTEWATER CONTINGENCY RESERVE 514 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 515 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 516 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Ninety-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred dollars 517 ($298,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 518 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning 519 July 1, 2021 andending June 30, 2022: 520 CASH RECEIPTS 521 2020/21 2021/22 522 REVISED BUDGET 523 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 294,200 296,500 524 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 294,200 296,500 525 RECEIPTS 526 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 2,300 2,300 527 TOTAL RECEIPTS 2,300 2,300 528 TOTALS $ 296,500 $ 298,800 529 BUDGET SUMMARY 530 2020/21 2021/22 531 REVISED BUDGET 532 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 296,500 $ 298,800 533 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 296,500 298,800 534 TOTAL EXPENSES AND CURRENT YEAR BALANCES $ 296,500 $ 298,800 535 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 536 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 537 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 201 18

Item #16. FINAL READING 538 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 539 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND 540 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 541 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 542 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ninety-Two Million Seven Hundred Seventy-Four Thousand Eight Hundr 543 dollars ($92,774,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 544 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 545 the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 546 2020/21 2021/22 547 REVISED BUDGET 548 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 10,230,300 $ 10,913,400 549 DISTRIBUTION OF EARNINGS - PCA CREDIT (5,246,100) (5,196,000) 550 BEGINNING BALANCE - ADJUSTED 4,984,200 5,717,400 551 BASE REVENUE 552 DIRECT SALES TO CUSTOMER 80,417,400 81,960,900 553 UTILITY TAX 1,245,100 1,271,500 554 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 640,000 538,000 555 RENT REVENUE - 110,000 556 GREEN ENERGY 127,000 127,000 557 INTEREST EARNINGS 157,400 175,000 558 TRANSFER FROM RATE STABILIZATION 2,500,000 2,800,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS (ERP) - 75,000 558 TOTAL REVENUES 85,086,900 87,057,400 559 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE & REVENUES $ 90,071,100 $ 92,774,800 Page 202 19

Item #16. FINAL READING 560 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES 561 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2021-2022 562 2020/21 2021/22 563 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 564 POWER SUPPLY $ 19,715,300 $ 19,773,200 565 SOLAR ENERGY 3,401,100 3,237,300 566 SOLAR RENEWAL ENERGY CREDITS 384,100 409,600 567 POWER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 634,800 634,800 568 REC'S (Renewable Energy Credits) 614,600 1,300,000 569 RGGI (Regional Greenhouse Gas Init.) 12,300 33,700 570 PJM CHARGES - ENERGY 5,871,900 5,508,400 571 PJM CHARGES - TRANSMISSION & FEES 8,476,800 6,772,100 572 CAPACITY CHARGES 15,048,100 13,322,900 573 SUB-TOTAL POWER SUPPLY 54,159,000 50,992,000 574 PLANT OPERATIONS 4,706,100 2,219,500 575 GENERATIONS FUELS 488,400 300,200 576 PJM SPOT MARKET ENERGY (808,300) (366,200) 577 PJM CREDITS (369,400) (87,000) 578 CAPACITY CREDITS (12,191,700) (5,411,200) 579 GENERATION SUBTOTAL (8,174,900) (3,344,700) 580 POWER SUPPLY & GENERATION SUBTOTAL 45,984,100 47,647,300 581 DIRECT EXPENDITURES 582 TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION 4,010,600 4,127,400 583 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 1,381,400 1,419,600 584 ADMINISTRATION 707,400 910,100 585 METER READING 375,300 389,400 586 SYSTEMS OPERATIONS 871,100 942,200 587 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTALS 7,345,800 7,788,700 588 OTHER EXPENSES: 589 UTILITY TAX 1,245,100 1,271,500 590 ALLOW FOR UNCOLLECTIBLES 300,000 300,000 591 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - RFP'S - 60,000 592 LEGAL EXPENSES 100,000 50,000 593 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 789,600 843,500 594 GREEN ENERGY PAYMENT TO DEMEC 127,000 127,000 595 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 3,798,900 3,628,500 596 INTEREST ON DEPOSITS 21,000 21,000 597 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 330,300 500,000 598 BOND ISSUANCE COST - 40,000 599 DEBT SERVICE 1,378,600 1,800,000 600 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 8,090,500 8,641,500 601 TRANSFER TO: 602 IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION 6,000,000 3,711,100 603 GENERAL FUND 10,000,000 11,000,000 604 RATE STABILIZATION RESERVE 2,000,000 2,000,000 605 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 18,000,000 16,711,100 606 TOTAL EXPENSES 79,420,400 80,788,600 607 BUDGET BALANCE - WORKING CAPITAL 10,650,700 11,986,200 608 TOTALS $ 90,071,100 $ 92,774,800 609 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 610 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 611 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 203 20

Item #16. FINAL READING 612 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 613 ELECTRIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION FUND 614 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 615 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 616 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Forty-Four Million Four Hundred Fifty-Three Thousand Five Hundred 617 dollars ($44,453,500) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 618 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 619 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 620 REVENUES 621 2020/21 2021/22 622 REVISED BUDGET 623 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 16,384,800 $ 22,581,700 624 REVENUES 625 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC 6,000,000 3,711,100 626 BOND ISSUE PROCEEDS - 8,575,200 627 GENERAL SERVICE BILLING 400,000 400,000 628 TRF FROM DEPRECIATION RSV 1,000,000 9,000,000 629 INTEREST EARNINGS 218,200 185,500 630 TOTAL REVENUES 7,618,200 21,871,800 631 TOTALS $ 24,003,000 $ 44,453,500 632 EXPENSE SUMMARY 633 2020/21 2021/22 634 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 635 ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATION $ 2,064,400 $ 1,843,200 636 ELECTRIC GENERATION 1,301,700 9,070,000 637 TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION 1,293,000 1,320,800 638 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 2,706,600 8,952,300 639 ERP SYSTEM 1,244,800 500,000 640 TOTAL EXPENSES 8,610,500 21,686,300 641 BUDGET BALANCE 15,392,500 22,767,200 642 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCE & EXPENSES $ 24,003,000 $ 44,453,500 643 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 644 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 645 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 204 21

Item #16. FINAL READING 646 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 647 ELECTRIC UTILITY CONTINGENCY RESERVE 648 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 649 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 650 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Nine Hundred Forty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred dollars 651 ($942,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 652 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 653 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 654 CASH RECEIPTS 655 2020/21 2021/22 656 REVISED BUDGET 657 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 908,300 $ 928,800 658 RECEIPTS 659 INTEREST EARNINGS 20,500 14,000 660 TOTAL RECEIPTS 20,500 14,000 661 TOTALS $ 928,800 $ 942,800 662 EXPENSE SUMMARY 663 2020/21 2021/22 664 REVISED BUDGET 665 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE $ 928,800 $ 942,800 666 TOTALS $ 928,800 $ 942,800 667 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 668 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 669 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 205 22

Item #16. FINAL READING 670 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 671 ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPRECIATION RESERVE 672 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 673 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 674 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Twenty Million Eight Hundred Ninety-Three Thousand 675 dollars ($20,893,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 676 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 677 the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 678 CASH RECEIPTS 679 2020/21 2021/22 680 REVISED BUDGET 681 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 21,244,200 $ 20,568,600 682 INTEREST EARNINGS 324,400 324,400 683 TOTALS $ 21,568,600 $ 20,893,000 684 BUDGET SUMMARY 685 2020/21 2021/22 686 REVISED BUDGET 687 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC I & E $ 1,000,000 $ 9,000,000 688 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 20,568,600 11,893,000 689 TOTALS $ 21,568,600 $ 20,893,000 689 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 690 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 691 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 206 23

Item #16. FINAL READING 692 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 693 ELECTRIC UTILITY FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE 694 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 695 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 696 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Fourteen Million One Hundred Twenty-Three Thousand 697 Eight Hundred dollars ($14,123,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 698 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 699 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 700 CASH RECEIPTS 701 2020/21 2021/22 702 REVISED BUDGET 703 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 13,896,600 $ 13,984,000 704 INTEREST EARNINGS 87,400 139,800 705 TOTALS $ 13,984,000 $ 14,123,800 706 BUDGET SUMMARY 707 2020/21 2021/22 708 REVISED BUDGET 709 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE $ 13,984,000 $ 14,123,800 710 TOTALS $ 13,984,000 $ 14,123,800 711 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 712 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 713 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 207 24

Item #16. FINAL READING 714 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 715 ELECTRIC UTILITY INSURANCE STABLIZATION RESERVE 716 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 717 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 718 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Sixty-Four Thousand One Hundred dollars 719 ($864,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 720 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 721 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 722 CASH RECEIPTS 723 2020/21 2021/22 724 REVISED BUDGET 725 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 797,500 $ 815,200 726 INTEREST EARNINGS 17,700 48,900 727 TOTALS $ 815,200 $ 864,100 728 BUDGET SUMMARY 729 2020/21 2021/22 730 REVISED BUDGET 731 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE $ 815,200 $ 864,100 732 TOTALS $ 815,200 $ 864,100 733 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 734 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 735 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 208 25

Item #16. FINAL READING 736 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 737 ELECTRIC UTILITY RATE STABLIZATION RESERVE 738 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 739 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 740 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Twenty-Four Million Two Hundred Seventy-Six Thousand Two 741 Hundred dollars ($24,276,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 742 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 743 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 744 CASH RECEIPTS 745 2020/21 2021/22 746 REVISED BUDGET 747 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 22,348,600 $ 22,206,200 748 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 749 INTEREST EARNINGS 357,600 70,000 750 TOTALS $ 24,706,200 $ 24,276,200 751 BUDGET SUMMARY 752 2020/21 2021/22 753 REVISED BUDGET 754 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND $ 2,500,000 $ 2,800,000 755 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 22,206,200 21,476,200 756 TOTALS $ 24,706,200 $ 24,276,200 757 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 758 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 759 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 209 26

Item #16. FINAL READING 760 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 761 MUNICIPAL STREET AID FUND 762 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 763 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 764 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand One Hundred dollars 765 ($750,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 766 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 767 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 768 CASH RECEIPTS 769 2020/21 2021/22 770 REVISED BUDGET 771 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 100 $ 100 772 STATE GRANT 796,000 750,000 773 TOTALS $ 796,100 $ 750,100 774 BUDGET SUMMARY 775 2020/21 2021/22 776 REVISED BUDGET 777 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ 796,000 $ 750,000 778 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 100 100 779 TOTALS $ 796,100 $ 750,100 780 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 781 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 782 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 210 27

Item #16. FINAL READING 783 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 784 ELECTRONIC RED LIGHT SAFETY PROGRAM 785 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 786 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 787 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Hundred Thousand One Hundred dollars 788 ($400,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 789 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 790 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 791 CASH RECEIPTS 792 2020/21 2021/22 793 REVISED BUDGET 794 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 100 $ 100 795 POLICE FINES 445,000 400,000 796 TOTALS $ 445,100 $ 400,100 797 BUDGET SUMMARY 798 2020/21 2021/22 799 REVISED BUDGET 800 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ 445,000 $ 400,000 801 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 100 100 802 TOTALS $ 445,100 $ 400,100 803 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 804 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 805 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 211 28

Item #16. FINAL READING 806 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 807 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND 808 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 809 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 810 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Million Eight Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Six 811 Hundred dollars ($2,825,600) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 812 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 813 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 814 OPERATING REVENUES 815 2020/21 2021/22 816 REVISED BUDGET 817 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 2,450,500 $ 1,803,600 818 INTEREST INCOME 31,500 28,500 819 PREMIUM FROM CITY 880,100 993,500 820 TOTALS $ 3,362,100 $ 2,825,600 821 OPERATING EXPENSES 822 2020/21 2021/22 823 REVISED BUDGET 824 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES - CLAIMS $ 394,000 $ 480,000 825 INSURANCE 110,800 145,000 826 STATE OF DEL - SELF INSURANCE TAX 33,500 39,000 827 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 22,100 25,000 828 TOTAL EXPENSES 560,400 689,000 829 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 2,801,700 2,136,600 830 TOTALS $ 3,362,100 $ 2,825,600 831 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 832 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 833 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 212 29

Item #16. FINAL READING 834 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 835 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND 836 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 837 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 838 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Ninety-Five Thousand Eight Hundred dollars 839 ($795,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 840 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 841 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 842 OPERATING REVENUES 843 2020/21 2021/22 844 REVISED BUDGET 845 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 334,000 $ 312,400 846 GRANTS REVENUE 500,000 483,400 847 TOTALS $ 834,000 $ 795,800 848 OPERATING EXPENSES 849 2020/21 2021/22 850 REVISED BUDGET 851 PROGRAM EXP. GRANT RELATED $ 171,600 $ 596,500 852 853 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 662,400 199,300 854 TOTALS $ 834,000 $ 795,800 855 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 856 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 857 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 213 30

Item #16. FINAL READING 858 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 859 LIBRARY GRANT FUND 860 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 861 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 862 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Seventy-Seven Thousand Seven Hundred dollars 863 ($277,700) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 864 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 865 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 866 OPERATING REVENUES 867 2020/21 2021/22 868 REVISED BUDGET 869 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 18,900 $ - 870 STATE GRANT 280,800 275,000 871 FEDERAL GRANT 1,800 2,700 912 TOTALS $ 301,500 $ 277,700 913 OPERATING EXPENSES 914 2020/21 2021/22 915 REVISED BUDGET 916 STATE GRANTS 917 FURNITURE/FIXTURES $ 5,500 $ 5,000 918 OFFICE SUPPLIES 28,000 23,100 919 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 13,700 15,000 920 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 25,500 28,200 921 BOOKS 128,800 125,000 922 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 2,500 3,000 923 COMPUTER HARDWARE 5,300 500 924 AUDIO VISUAL SUPPLIES 79,000 67,700 925 POSTAGE 200 100 926 TRAINING/CONF/FOOD/TRAV 4,200 3,000 927 OFF EQP/REPAIRS & MAINT 4,000 1,900 928 OTHER EQUIP - LEASE 2,100 2,500 929 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES STATE GRANTS 298,800 275,000 930 FEDERAL GRANTS 931 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 2,700 2,700 932 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES FEDERAL GRANTS 2,700 2,700 933 GRAND TOTAL EXPENSES 301,500 277,700 934 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - 935 TOTALS $ 301,500 $ 277,700 936 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 937 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 938 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 214 31

Item #16. FINAL READING 939 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 940 CDBG GRANT FUND 941 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 942 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 943 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Three 944 dollars ($334,943) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 945 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 946 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 947 OPERATING REVENUES 948 2020/21 2021/22 949 REVISED BUDGET 950 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 2,500 $ 2,500 951 CDBG GRANTS RECEIVED 632,077 332,443 952 TOTALS $ 634,577 $ 334,943 953 OPERATING EXPENSES 954 2020/21 2021/22 955 REVISED BUDGET 956 EXPENDITURES 957 PRIOR YEAR CLOSING COST/DOWN PAYMENT PROGRAM $ 1,855 $ - 958 PRIOR YEAR MHDC HOMEOWNER REHAB. 55,522 - 959 PRIOR YEAR MHDC EMERGENCY HOME REPAIR 35,385 - 960 CURRENT YEAR CLOSING COST/DOWN PAYMENT PROGRAM 97,845 100,000 961 CURRENT YEAR DOVER INTERFAITH MINISTRY 30,000 61,016 962 CURRENT YEAR DOVER NCALL - 30,000 963 CURRENT YEAR MHDC EMERGENCY HOME REPAIR 33,000 40,000 964 CURRENT YEAR MHDC HOMEOWNER REHAB. 25,000 25,827 965 CURRENT YEAR DIMH & CENTRAL DE HOUSING COLLABORATIVE 75,284 20,600 966 CURRENT YEAR CARES ACT (COVID-19) 163,211 - 967 CURRENT YEAR ADMIN EXPENSE 114,976 55,000 968 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 632,078 332,443 969 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 2,500 2,500 970 TOTALS $ 634,578 $ 334,943 971 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 972 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 973 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 215 32

Item #16. FINAL READING 974 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 975 207 - POLICE GRANTS FUND 976 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 977 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 978 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Thirty Thousand dollars ($830,000) 979 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 980 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 981 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 982 OPERATING REVENUES 983 2020/21 2021/22 984 REVISED BUDGET 985 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 129,000 $ 50,000 986 STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS RECEIVED 635,000 780,000 987 TOTALS $ 764,000 $ 830,000 988 OPERATING EXPENSES 989 2020/21 2021/22 990 REVISED BUDGET 991 EXPENDITURES 992 MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 993 POLICE EQUIPT & PROG SUPP 643,600 235,000 TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT - 210,000 994 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 995 CELL PHONE CHARGES 20,000 15,000 996 TRAINING 19,700 10,000 997 AUDIT FEES 1,000 - 998 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 684,300 470,000 999 OTHER FINANCING USES 1000 OPERATING TRANSFERS-OUT 4,300 310,000 1001 TOTAL FINANCING USES 4,300 310,000 1002 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 75,400 50,000 1003 TOTALS $ 764,000 $ 830,000 1004 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. 1005 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 1006 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 1007 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 216 33

Item #16. FINAL READING 1008 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 1009 209 - POLICE GRANTS FUND 1010 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 1011 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 1012 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Thirty Thousand dollars ($330,000) 1013 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 1014 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 1015 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 1016 OPERATING REVENUES 1017 2020/21 2021/22 1018 REVISED BUDGET 1019 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ - $ - 1020 STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS RECEIVED 212,400 330,000 1021 TOTALS $ 212,400 $ 330,000 1022 OPERATING EXPENSES 1023 2020/21 2021/22 1024 REVISED BUDGET 1025 EXPENDITURES 1026 MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 1027 POLICE EQUIPT & PROG SUPP 118,000 265,000 1028 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 63,500 1029 TRAINING - 15,000 1030 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 181,500 280,000 1031 OTHER FINANCING USES 1032 OPERATING TRANSFERS-OUT 30,900 50,000 1033 TOTAL FINANCING USES 30,900 50,000 1034 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - 1035 TOTALS $ 212,400 $ 330,000 1036 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. 1037 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 1038 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 1039 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 217 34

Item #16. FINAL READING 1040 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 1041 SUBSTANCE ABUSE GRANTS FUND 1042 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 1043 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 1044 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Hundred Forty-Four Thousand Seven Hundre dollars ($144,700) 1045 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds 1046 for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning 1047 July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 1048 OPERATING REVENUES 1049 2020/21 2021/22 1050 REVISED BUDGET 1051 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 52,000 $ 83,700 1052 STATE GRANTS RECEIVED 28,000 28,000 1053 RECREATION REVENUE 33,000 33,000 1054 TOTALS $ 113,000 $ 144,700 1055 OPERATING EXPENSES 1056 2020/21 2021/22 1057 REVISED BUDGET 1058 EXPENDITURES 1059 TEMPORARY HELP/BENEFITS $ 68,500 $ 68,500 1060 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 35,000 35,000 1061 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 103,500 103,500 1062 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 9,500 41,200 1063 TOTALS $ 113,000 $ 144,700 1064 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. 1065 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 1066 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 1067 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 218 35

Item #16. FINAL READING 1068 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 1069 REALTY TRANSFER TAX FUND 1070 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 1071 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 1072 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Four Hundred Thousand dollars ($1,400,000) 1073 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 1074 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal 1075 year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 1076 CASH RECEIPTS 1077 2020/21 2021/22 1078 REVISED BUDGET 1079 BEGINNING BALANCE $ - $ - 1080 REALTY TRANSFER TAXES 1,525,000 1,400,000 1081 TOTALS $ 1,525,000 $ 1,400,000 1082 BUDGET SUMMARY 1083 2020/21 2021/22 1084 REVISED BUDGET 1085 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ 1,525,000 $ 1,400,000 1086 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - 1087 TOTALS $ 1,525,000 $ 1,400,000 1088 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 1089 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 1090 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 219 36

Item #16. FINAL READING 1091 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 1092 LODGING TAX FUND 1093 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 1094 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 1095 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Thousand 1096 dollars ($300,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 1097 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal 1098 year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 1099 CASH RECEIPTS 1100 2020/21 2021/22 1101 REVISED BUDGET 1102 BEGINNING BALANCE $ - $ - 1103 LODGING TAXES 110,000 300,000 1104 TOTALS $ 110,000 $ 300,000 1105 BUDGET SUMMARY 1106 2020/21 2021/22 1107 REVISED BUDGET 1108 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJECT FUND $ 110,000 $ 300,000 1109 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - 1110 TOTALS $ 110,000 $ 300,000 1111 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 1112 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 1113 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 220 37