Dokiman ki tache

ATTAC NT #1 City of Dover Annexation Plan Cost/Revenue Analysis (1/7/2004) Module 2H DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Module: 2H Location: Chestnut Grove Road - County Read 158 Size: 50.8 acres Proposed Zoning: RM-1 Medium Density Residential Estimated Development Site Sales Price: Not Available Residential , Existing: 0 Buildaut Potential: 199 40 single family; 28 duplexes; 131 townhouses Total Units: 199 Average Sales Price per Unit $140,000 Persons per Househald:* 2.35 Existing Population: 0 Estimated Additional Popuiation: 468 Total Population: 468 Kent County Residents: Other Existing: 0 SF retail/oificeAwarehouse Proposed: 0 SF professional/medical office space Total Commercial: 0 Electric Circuit Extension Required? Only required once per development For Residential (add $1,800): $1,800 For Commercial (add $1,800, if not already added for $0 residential): Estimated Development Period: 4 years Estimated Miles of Streets Residential 1.0300 Estimated Miles of Streets Commercial 0.0000 According to the US Census Data (2000) City of Dover persons per household equals 2.35. City of Dover Population Estimate (FY 2004 Budget) 33,829 Percent Additional Commercial Base Calculation Total Property Tax Paid $6,982,470.00 Percent Commercial/industrial 0.52 Tatai Commercial Property Tax Paid $3,630,884.40 Module Appraised Value - Commercial ($110/SF) $0.00 Taxed at $0.411 per $100 $0.00 Percent Additional Commercial Base Calculation 0.0000% PROGRAN - Module 2H 1712004 Page i

sso'szr'ss vor eze’rs aro'aes'z$ Giz'rss yoeduy) snusneynso 18N Sal sbe$ g9s'cor$ Giz'vss SOL LIPS ges'cpes: £180, zsee,, “8g 189d "Ag 180g L1Pay gieay Sra rst SBL LES gas'eoes elerss SOL LIS gac'eges GLz'yst SEL Lbs S9s'escs 602'6L7$ gee'osts PST avi 4g BIL 19% 2b9°009$ ‘r6'Z0S$ ‘8r2'SOr$ Oss"L0E$ BNUBAIY [RIO] aep lees aus'zees L9Z'ERLS oee'6cs: s803 1€10) e188, 7288), pies, Jusurdojeseg veuidojsasg juawdojsaca 1ea, raTLoN 138K ssea, Ag 80g “N90 130d Qt Fea, § 288d LOVIN WLOL SOLcips SaL'Livs 060'8$ SRL Les sac'tees 060'8S SRL Lbs epe'zas$ 620° 2$ 9so's$ beo'es sols SHOUERSISIYY ebz'sors oss'20r$ ANNSARY WiOL O60'B$ O60'8s a6o's$ 6 eLses elses elses ela’ ELSES e2s'e$ oeh'es €Ce'2$ Opes Lbvs ‘BSppPUeL ISEQWAD aL . Ses res S2s'P6s S2s'bE$ sz¢'v6$, 2a] PEduy Ja]EMIISEAM ab PLVSS PLES vLy'SS PLESS eLVSS PLESs O02"6S$ 002'6s$ oo2'6S$ 902'6S$, ‘Sesuad] 9 SHUEY OL Ore LAS Oresis Ores Ore'Lis Ore’ bIs Ore’ Lit lapr'Ors earls Bibs, eerie uonelues: ot pg9a'ags yoe'sos yae'so$ pag'g9$ pag'99$ pga'go$ 905"8S$ 62'S rL0'S27$ gse'es reyeamag wh eee'Sls Cee'sLs EES'SLLS Eee'Szig eea'szi$ Cee'SLg PSB'ESI$ S6a'601$ 2€6'S9$ 6612S auyala eh €66'6S 66'6s c66'6$ €68'6S €66'6S c66'6$ FPL es “Spz'os bees Brz1s puns Ply leans ledownyy a bares vIB Les viele rie'les riabes viees Sb POLS SLE'POWS Sép'rous SPOS xe] J9j5ue1| SOS'bLIS SOS'PHS SOSH SOS*plEs SOS'FLIS sashes KA? Y cle'bss xe) Ayodosy g sea, "ARG 180d © 4eaK Zea, £see, cae 150g “n9q 180g “ASG 180g 1 388X gQJeay g 1eay eseay zaeay ake, uawdosnag qweudesreg jueudojaneg juaudojaneq Ereoh Zieay 4 120K aaunog enuaney aNNaAay ‘sos'coes g9s'E9e$ Up eres LOTEEDS are'6es 1809 WILOL asz'ors sz2'82$ sez’ sre'st Gujesedg, gos'roes gos'rocs 196'Sr$ ggs‘ears 4968'ShS 196'ShS \ae'srs 196 sts L96'srs on edeg AANE RSIULUpY je1oUdE) LEZLBLS vez'tes BET TPES Lez"b els FEZ bLS VEEP S LAS EZ o2z‘aag zae'ess wSO'LIS Buperado, 008'1$ yeyded 12913 ersus aps'2s ers'ss ers ss EPS ls : PEL'Ds eeezs eres Gunerado yeydea uoyeasI8y BYE os6'zs ose'Zs OS6'2¢ 0S6'L$ OS6'LS gS69S 696'rS 1e6'Z$ vest Bugeiadg Z fended fuesqny gates 901'S$ geb'es gates 9gt'es wey Bujeradg. 9 eides, sieans zzr'ss zzy'6s zep'es zzp'e$ zer'es e8a'ss, res'es SLVis Suneiado wenden suogzedsu) 9 BuyuUuelg. Supesedg, y . yendeg ang o89'Z2$ oga'L2$ any oRg' 228 O8e' L$ jaez'b2$ oss'ars oet'ezs are'es Guneredg £ wee 90d Gel'yes, GCt'bZ$ Ber'pzs 6ei'F2$ GELPes seqi2s 290'St$ z50'6s LOS Bupessdo g reudeg woe ues SSP'L eS Sov hes SSr'ies Spb hs Sobers esz'9e$ 808'sz$ ors'sis JOIEM Fees, g sea, pies, aE, Zaway basa isog “AOQ 180d “aag \eog, *Ae@ 0g “nag 0g § 483, Brea, Lieay g ieay bea, “A9q 180g Ga, Jeo, g dea, zaeay $4e8), huawidojensg jusuidojersg yuaudojereg soudojneg leah Z4eay 1 4B8), aajAlag siso3 SueHIOP pODZ Uj Be stoquuNU WY Hz ajnpoy (yooz/t/+) siséjeuy enuensypsoa Saounos pug ‘suopeinajea “suopdunsse 40) sajou PAYIeYe OF JY Uejg Uoexouuy 18A0Qg jo ANID

City of Dover Annexation Pian Cost/Revenue Analysis (1/7/2004) Module 2H Residential Costs 1. Water/Sewer Assumptions: a. Developer will pay for infrastructure b. * Sewer & Water Infrastructure Betterment: Potential exists for additional costs for associated infrastructure development related to citywide utilities strategic planning, research and development. c. Cost of service estimated 45% residential, 30% commercial, 25% institutional. Formula: + Water/Wastewater $6,627,093.00 ++ Percent Residential * 0.45 $2,982,191.85 t+ Service Area Population / 33,642 Per Person Estimated: Additio Total Residential Cost Sources: + 2003-2004 Budget +t Department of Public Works +++ Planning Office; Average of water poputation (34,874) and sewer poputation (32,410) 2. Sanitation Assumptions: a. 19,169 tons to landfill per year Formula: + Sanitation $1,992,851.00 ++ Tons to Landfill / Year i 19,169 Cost per Ton $103.96 ++ Annual lbs/person . 993 Persons/unit a * 2.35 Lbs per Unit 2,333.55 Lbs per Ton i 2,000 Annual tons/unit 117 Cost per Ton * $103.96 Annual cost/unit $121.30 Units Maha : 199: Total Residential Cost $24,139 Sources: + 2003-2004 Buaget ++ Department of Public Works 1/7/2004 NOTES - Module 2H Residential Page 1

3. Police Assumptions a. Additional dispatcher required with 10% population increase b. Dispatcher costs (salary and benefits) approx. $40,000/year c. Estimated 60% of service costs are residential; 30% commercial; 10% industrial d. Dispatcher costs effective Deveiopment Year 1 Formulas: Dispatcher Saiary $40,000.00 + 60% Residential * 0.60 $24,000.00 10% population increase ! 3,383 Dispatcher/additiona i $7.09 Additional Population Cost Addional Dispatcher (Residential) +t Police $9,365,435.00 + 60% residential * 0.60 $5,619,261.00 City of Dover Population : Per Capita $166.11 Additional Population ; a Total Residential Cost $77,680 Sources: + Percent residential estimated from Police Department t+ 2003-2004 Budget 4. Fire a. + No additional costs. Module within existing Dover Fire service area. The addition of units and population planned for this module not anticipated to impact either operating or capital costs for service. Sources: + Fire Department 5. Planning & Inspections Assumptions a, * Total cost 66% residential, 26% commercial, 8% industrial Formula + Planning & Inspections $1,032,715.00 ++ 66% residential bd 0.66 $681,591.90 City of Dover Population ! 33,829 Per Capita : - $20.15 Additional Population * 468 $9,422 Total Residential Cost Sources: + 2003-2004 Budget ++ Planning Department NOTES - Moduie 2H Residential $3,318 « 1/7/2004 Page2

6. Streets Assumptions a. Developer will pay for infrastructure b. Approx. 90 miles of streets maintained by City (74.27 miles of streets and 15.29 miles of alleys) c. Capital maintenance costs estimated at $308,700 d. New streets will not be dedicated until new development at least 80% complete Formula + Streets $1,024,013.00 +t Capital Maintenance - $308,700.00 $715,313.00 + Miles maintained i 90 Cost per Mile $7,947.92 t1+ New: Streets (miles), i Total Annual Cost - Residential $8,186 Sources: + 2003-2004 Budget ++ Department of Public Works tre KSK 7. Library Assumptions a. _ Library serves 78,923 city and county residents b. 22,616 of total served are city residents (67% of city population) c. 67% Additional Population will join the library Formuia + Library $856,472.00 +r Percent city residents served (67%) * 0.67 $573,836.24 t+ City population served a 22,616 Cost per city resident $25.37 67% Additional Poputation ~ re ae 313 Total Annual Cost - Residential $7,950 Sources: + 2003-2004 Budget ++ City of Dover Library 8. Parks & Recreation Formuta + Parks & Recreation $545,563.00 City of Dover Population mos Oe Sap 33,829 Cost per person $16.13 Additional Population Oe 468 Total Annual Cost $7,542 Sources: + 2003-2004 Budget NOTES - Module 2H Residential V/7/2004 Page 3

9. Electric Assumptions a. _ On Site infrastructure paid by developer b. City responsibie for capital cost of circuit extension to development site estimated at $1,800 d. Cost of service to residential customers 24.4% of total e. Service area population is 46,794 Formula + Electric $57,917,547.00 ++ Percent Residential * 0.244 $14,131,881.47 trr Service Area Population / 46,794 Costperperson $302.00 Additional Population e468" Total Annual Cost $141,231 Circuit Extension (if required) Cost for Circuit Extension 31,800 Sources: + 2003-2004 Budget ++ Electric Department ttt Planning Department 10. General Administrative Assumptions a. ‘Total cost estimated 66% residential; 26% commercial; 8% industrial Formula + General Administrative $5,037 452.05 ++ Percent residential * 0.66 $3,324,718.35 City. of Dover Population. “Te 33,829 ; $98.28 Additional Population . bd 468 Total Annual Cost $46,961 Sources: + 2003-2004 Budget +t Estimated by Dover department heads during conference call with Urban Pariners on 10/14/03 NOTES - Module 2H Residential 4/7/2004 Page 4

Residential Revenue 11. Property Tax Assumptions: a. _ Property tax is 41.1 cents per $100 assessment (100% appraised) Formula: , Average Sales Price per $100 Assessme: = $1,400.00° + Property Tax . 0.411 Revenue Per Unit . $575.40 Number of Units area 199. Total Annual Revenue - Residential $114,505 Source: + Tax Assessor's Office 9/03 12. Transter Tax Assumptions: a. Transfer tax is 1.5% of real estate transfer price b. * Estimate 5.22% residential units re-sold per year (Avg from 1999-2002); 0.02% commercial/industrial per year Formuias: ; : Development Site Sales Price > © Not Available Transfer Tax 0,015 initial Revenue #VALUE! Average Sales: Price per Unit. oo 2 3$440,000-00 + Transfer Tax ‘ 0.015 Revenue per Unit _ $2,100.00 Number of New Units wf : 199 Revenue Over Development Period $417,900 Revenue per Unit . $2,100.00 Number of New Units : . 199 + Percentage Units Re-sold per Year . 0.0522 Total Annual Revenue - Residential $21,814 Source: + Tax Assessor's Oifice 9/03 13. Municipal Street Aid Fund Assumptions: a. Distribution per mile as of 7/1/03 = $5,093.31 b. Distribution per capita as of 7/1/03 = $10.15 (Development Year 1) d. New streets will not be dedicated until new development at least 80% complete Formula: + Distribution per Mile $5,093.31 ++ Miles New Streets - * 1.0300 Total New Streets Distribution $5,246.11 "+ Distribution per Capita $10.15 Additional Population ‘ 468 Total Per Capita Distribution . $4,746.65 Totai New Streets Distribution $5,246.11 Total Population Distribution + $4,746.65 Total Annual Revenue - Residential $9,993 Source: + Municipal Stree! Aid Fund Distribution Tabulation Fiscal Year 2004 r+ KSK NOTES - Module 2H Residential 17712004 Pages

14. Electric a, Service area population is 46,794 Formula + Residential Revenue $17,594,178.18 Service Area Population / 46,794 Total Revenue per Person $375.99 Additional Population Total Annual Revenue - Residential $175,833 Source: + City of Dover Electric Department 15. Sewer & Water Assumptions: a. * Typical sewer/water bill per household based on 7,000 gallons/mo: $11.55 (sewer} + $16.45 (water) = $28/mo ($336/year) b. 45% residential, 30% commercial, 25% industrial Formula: Average Annual Residential Number.ofNew.Units == °° Total Annual Revenue - Residential $66,864 Source: + 2003-2004 Budget 16. Sanitation Assumptions: a. Fee per unit is $5/mo ($60/year) Formuia: + Annualized Fee per Unit . $60,00 Number of Units el os So 496 Total Annual Revenue - Residential $11,940 Source: + Department of Public Works 17. Permits & Licenses Assumptions: a. Revenue from development permits estimated at $1,200 per unit b. 7? 50% residential; 40% commercial; 10% industrial Formulas: + Est. Revenue from Permits per Unit $1,200.00 New Units Pe we a Total Development Period Revenue - Residential $238,800 +t Permits & Other Licenses $748,500.00 tr+ Percent Residential * 0.5 $374,250.00 Population ; oe po 33,829. Per Capita Revenue ; 511.06 Additional Population - ane 468 Total Annua/ Revenue - Residential . $5,174 Source: + Daver Tax Assessor's Office, 10/14/03 ++ 2003-2004 Budget trt Dover Planning Office, 10/23/03 NOTES - Module 2H Residential 4147/2004 Page6

18. Wastewater impact Fee Assumptions: a, City fee per unit is $1,900 b. Total impact fee per unit includes additional $1,115 for the County and an $11 administrative fee Formula: + Fee per Unit $1,900.00 Number of New Units Po, a “199° Total Development Period Revenue $378,100 Source: + Department of Public Works 18. Comcast Franchise Assumptions: a. Feeis 5% of service fee b. 75% of househoids will subscribe Formula: + Average Fee per Year $336,756 + Number of Subscribers / 14,068 Total Fee per Subscriber _ $23.94 Estimated Subscribers __ a 449.25 Total Annual Revenue - Residential $3,573 Source: + Comcast Cabtevision of Deimerva Subscnber Gross Receipts Statement (4/03-6/03); Dept. of Public Works 20. Miscellaneous Assumptions: a. Includes ravanue from Fines & Police, 911 Fees, Library, Misc. Charges, and Recreation Police: Residential 60%; Commercia! 30%: Industrial 10% Library (Kent Cnty Book Reimb) revenue loss from existing units 68% city residents are Library members b c. d. + Dover receives $1.95 per library item checked out by Kent County residents from the Kent County Book Reimbursement fund @ 7 56,307 Kent County residents are library members (exciuding City of Dover library members) and check out 160,610 items per year: Each Kent County library member checks out 2.85 items/year (average); 59.5% of Kent County residents are library members Formuia: ++ Fines & Police (60% of 675,520) $405,312.00 ++ 911 Fees (60% of 61,500) + $36,900.00 ++ Library (68% of $35,700) + $24,276.00 ++ Misc. Charges (66% of 43,550) + $28,743.00 ++ Recreation a $90,000.00 . . - $585,231.00 Population ee y 33,829 Per Capita Revenue . 317.30 £siimated Population . . 468. Net Annual Revenue - $8,090.20 + Kent County Book Reimoursement / Item $1.95 Items - Kent County Library Member : 2.85 Revenue Loss per Kent Cnty Library Member $5.56 Kent County % Library Members ‘ 0.595 Revenue Loss per Kent Cnty Resident $3.34 Net Annual Revenue $8,090.20 Library Revenue Loss for Kent Cnty Resident(s) - $0.00 Total Annual Revenue - Residential $8,080 Source: + City of Dover Library +t 2003-2004 Budget NOTES - Module 2H Residential 1447/2004 Page7

ATTAC T #2 Plan of Services Submission Form For Municipal Annexation Please Submit a Plan of Services to the Office of State Planning Coordination pursuant to §101 of Title 22, Delaware Code for review and acceptance prior final legislative action on municipal annexation. The plan services shall be conducted in accordance to standards or criteria set by the Cabinet Committee on State Planning Issues. L. Basic Data Ll. 1.2. 1.3. 1.4. 1.5. 1.6. 1.7. 1.8. Municipality Name: City of Dover Municipal Office Address: P.O. Box 475, Dover, Delaware, 19903 or 15 East Loockerman Street, Dover, Delaware, 19901 Municipal Office Phone Number: Public Works: (302) 736-7025, Planning: (302) 736-7010 Name of Municipal Contact: Public Works: Scott D. Koenig, P.E., Director Planning: Jim Galvin Jr. AICP, Director of Planning & Inspections or Dawn E. Melson, AICP, Planner Property Name/Description: Lands of Chestnut Grove Farm, LP Name/Address of Petitioner: Owner: Chestnut Grove Farm, LP C/o Sallie Scarborough 290 Troon Road Dover, DE 19904 and Equitable Owner: Garrison Custom Homes, Inc. C/o Jeff Garrison 49 Brenda.Lane Building L Suite F Camden, DE 19934 Tax Parcel Identification Number: ED-00-066.00-02-49.00-000 Property Address: South side of Chestnut Grove Road (County Road #158) west of Sweetgum Drive and Kenton Road 1.9. Acreage: 50.8 +/- acres 1.10. Locator Map (attach map): See Attachment A Ld. Concept Plan (if applicable): See Attachments B Attachment B is the Plan sheet required by the City of Dover Annexation process, which consists of a preliminary boundary survey and existing development on the property. Attachment B also inchides a plan sheet depicting the initial redevelopment design concept for property as presented by developer. Upon annexation any site

Plan of Services for AX-03-03 Lands of Chesmut Grove Farm LP South Side of Chesmut Grove Road December 2003/ January 2004 Page 2 of 6 development must be in compliance with the City of Dover Land Subdivision Regulations and the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Municipal Services 2.1 Please list the services your municipality provides: Sewer X__ Water X__ Trash X__ Police/Public Safety X__ Fire _X__ Electric X__ Streets X__ Street Lighting X__ Storm Drainage X__ Other _Internet, Library, and Parks & Recreation facilities and programs 3. Planning Information 3.1. Developed Prior to annexation? _xX Yes _ No (If yes, describe) An existing house, barn, and sheds shown on the property will be removed. Redevelopment of the site as a residential subdivision is anticipated. 3.2. Is property within the Municipal Annexation Plan?__X Yes ___No 3.3. How is the parce] depicted on the Municipal Annexation Plan? __X__ Annexation Area ____ Short Term Annexation Area ____ Long Term Annexation Area ___—sArrea of Concern ____ Other (Explain): 3.4, What is the land use designation on the Municipal Annexation Plan? __X__ Residential | Commercial __ Industrial __ Institutional or Community _____ Open Space__— Other (Please describe: __ 3.5. Current Use: Agricultural Land and woodland with existing residence

Plan of Services for AX-03-03 Lands of Chestnut Grove Farm LP South Side of Chesmut Grove Road December 2003/ January 2004 Page 3 of 6 Proposed Use: Single Family Residential - Major Subdivision consisting of 40 single family detached dwellings, 28 duplexes, and 131 townhouses. The conceptual plan has a total of 199 residential units. Current Zoning in County: RS-1 Single Family Residential Proposed Zoning: RM-1 Medium Density Residential Allowable Density under zoning: RM-1 gross residential density of 6 dwelling units per acre 3.6 Public Water? __X_Yes, available in vicinity Planned within 10 years____—s No 3.7 Public Sewer?__X__ Yes, available in vicinity Planned within 10 years No 4, Public Service Information (Please include name and address if different from municipality) Water System: 4.1 Name and address of water provider: City of Dover, P.O. Box 475, Dover, Delaware 19903. 4.2 Date of most recent water facilities plan: Last approved plan was completed in 1985 by Whitman, Requardt & Associates. The Department of Public Works has recently signed an agreement with Whitman, Requardt & Associates to update the City of Dover’s Water System Master Plan (2004-2024). 4.3. Please attach a copy of the relevant sections of the water facilities plan. The 1985 Water Facilities Plan does not have a specific section that would be relevant to the development of this farm. There is currently water service to the Westfield Subdivision that is located immediately east of this farm. The developer will be required to extend city service from the east side of Kenton Road to serve the proposed development. See also Attachment C. Attachment C is the Comprehensive Plan Update 2003 — Chapter 7 Public Utilities and Community Infrastructure Plan. 4.4 If there is no water facilities plan, please describe the method the water provider uses to determine system capacities, water allocations, and capital expenditures for needed expansions. N/A 4.5 Current system capacity (maximum without capital expenditures): 10 MGD permitted capacity 4.6 Current average water usage: 5 MGD (Winter average), 9 MGD (Summer maximum) 4.7 DNREC Permit allocation: 10 MGD (Max. Withdrawal) DNREC Permit # (23 Different Permits) 4.8 Estimated future water demand inside current municipal boundaries: 7 MGD (Winter average), 10 MGD (Summer maximum) 4.9 Estimated water needed for proposed annexation area: 59,700 gallons per day (GPD) based on a consumption rate of 300 gallons per day per dwelling. 4.10 Please attach a letter from the water service provider indicating that water service can be provided to the annexation area. The City of Dover Director of Public Works by

Plan of Services for AX-03-03 Lands of Chesmut Grove Farm LP South Side of Chesmut Grove Road December 2003/ January 2004 Page 4 of 6 submission of this plan of services has determined there will be adequate water supply to serve the proposed annexation. It should be noted that this land is currently part of Tidewater Utilities, Inc. Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) that was previously granted under a wide area franchise application. The developer, Tidewater and the City of Dover will need to negotiate the surrender of the franchised area. Wastewater System: 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 4.18 4.19 4.20 Name and address of wastewater service provider: City of Dover, P.O. Box 475, Dover, Delaware, 19903. Name and address of wastewater treatment operator, if different: Kent County, Department of Public Works, Robert O’Brien Building, 414 Federal Street, Dover, Delaware, 19901 Date of most recent wastewater facilities plan: 1999, All pump station and interceptors were analyzed. In addition, the gravity sewer system was mapped using AutoCAD. Please attach a copy of the relevant sections of the wastewater facilities plan. Initial here that the plan has been attached: See Attachment D. Attachment D is the Executive Summary of the Wastewater Facilities Management Plan. There is existing sanitary sewer infrastructure in the Westfield Subdivision and the Hunter’s Pointe Subdivision. The developer’s engineer will be responsible for designing and building infrastructure to connect to the City’s existing system so wastewater can be conveyed to Kent County for treatment. If there is no wastewater facilities plan, please describe the method the wastewater provider uses to determine system capacities, water allocations, and capital expenditures for needed expansions. N/A Current system treatment capacity (maximum without capital expenditures): All sanitary sewer flows are transmitted to Kent County for treatment. To our knowledge, the Kent County Wastewater Treatment Facility has the available capacity to serve the proposed development of the property. Current average wastewater flow: Average daily flow for 2003 was 5.95 MGD DNREC Permitted discharge: N/A DNREC Permit # N/A Are there TMDL issues or other constraints that would impact the ability of the town to obtain an additional permit allocation from DNREC? N/A Estimated future wastewater demand inside current municipal boundaries # of Approved EDUs: Approximately 1,500 — 2,000 E.D.U.s # of Vacant Buildable Acres within existing town: Estimated 6,000 — 8,000 E.D.U.s over 25 ycars. Estimated future wastewater demand for proposed annexation area: 39,800 — 59,700 gallons per day based on 199 dwelling units. Please attach a letter from the wastewater service provider and the wastewater treatment operator (if different) indicating that wastewater service can be provided to the annexation area, and that sufficient wastewater treatment capacity exists.or is planned to accommodate this annexation area. See Attachment E — Letter from Kent County Department of Public Works re: availability of sewer service. The City of Dover Director of Public Works by submission of this plan of services has determined

Plan of Services for AX-03-03 Lands of Chestnut Grove Farm LP South Side of Chestnut Grove Road December 2003/ January 2004 Page 5 of 6 there will be adequate wastewater service facilities to supply service to the proposed annexation. 4,23. Provider of Electricity: The City of Dover will provide electricity once the property is annexed into the City of Dover. 4.24. Date of Most Recent Update of Electrical Facilities Plan: 1999-2000. 4.25. Describe needed electrical upgrades needed, if any. The City of Dover is planning several electrical system upgrades to increase the reliability of the city’s system. All upgrades to extend distribution service to the property will be the responsibility of the developer. 4.26. If any services are to be provided by another jurisdiction or a public utility regulated by the Delaware Public Service Commission please include written comments of this provider that describe the their ability to provide the necessary services for the proposed annexation. As stated previously, this property is located in a CPCN granted to Tidewater Utilities, Inc. under a wide area franchise. Tidewater Utilities does not currently provide service to this undeveloped property. Tidewater’s existing infrastructure only serves the Hunier’s Point Subdivision located to the west of the proposed annexation. The City of Dover will negotiate with Tidewater Utilities, Inc. to amend the existing CPCN for this area. 4.27 Who provides police service to the municipality? What impact will this annexation have on the ability to provide police service to the municipality? (If not municipality in question, please provide a letter verifying ability to provide police service to newly annexed area): The City of Dover Police Department provides police service to the municipality. 4.28 Who provides fire service to the municipality? What impact will this annexation have on the ability to provide fire service to the municipality? (Please provide a letter verifying ability to provide fire service to newly annexed area): The Robbins Hose Fire Department provides fire service to the municipality. This proposed annexation area currently is part of the fire service area of Robbins Hose Fire Department.

Plan of Services for AX-03-03 Lands of Chestnut Grove Farm LP South Side of Chesmut Grove Road December 2003/ January 2004 Page 6 of 6 4.29 Who provides EMS services to the municipality? What impact will this annexation have on the ability to provide emergency medical services to the municipality? A private service, ASI provides ambulance service under contract with the City. 5. Fiscal Analysis 5.1. Does the municipality employ paid staff? X Yes ____ No If yes, how many paid staff does the municipality employ? (Give number in FTEs) 351 full-time personnel 45.2. For municipalities that provide services, does the municipality use separate enterprise funds for public services? _X__ Yes, The Water, Sewer, and Electric Utilities are all enterprise funds. __—-No 5.3. Municipal tax rate: $0.411 per hundred dollars of assessed value 5.4. Municipal tax valuation: Properties are assessed at 100% of market value. 5.5. Please include a copy of the municipality’s current fiscal year budget. See Attachment F — “Source and Use of Operating Funds Summary Fiscal Year 2003/04” chart from the FY¥2004 budget document (page 74). The entire City of Dover FY2004 Annual Operating Budget is available online on the City of Dover website at www.citvofdover.com under Information Desk (Public Documents: City of Budget 2004). 5.6. Please provide a copy of the municipality’s annexation committee report regarding this annexation. See transmittal cover letter for summary of annexation application review process and the “Petition to Annex and Zone Property” Report. Certifications: The undersigned certify that the information provided in this form is complete and accurate to the greatest extent practicable. We also certify that all required letters from other utility service providers and jurisdictions are attached. Spent Hata tayo" >. ‘Director of Public Works)

oe County Department of Public orks Engineering Division 744-2430 ROBERT W, O'BRIEN BLDG. Wastewarer Facilities 335-6000 414 FEDERAL STREET Facilities Management 744-2357 DOVER, DELAWARE 1991-3615 (HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE) December 18, 2003 Dawn E. Melson, AICP City of Dover P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903-0475 RE: Request for letter on Utility Services Lands of Chestnut Grove Farm LP on the south side of Chestnut Grove Road, Dover Tax Parcel Number ED00-066.00-02-49.00/000 Dear, Hay hMelson: We. ne in receipt of your letter dated December 17, 2003, requesting a statement with regards to availability of sewer service to the above referenced properties. You stated that the proposed zoning for the properties is RM-1. Sewer collection and local transmission service for this area including the aforementioned properties is provided by the City of Dover. The City Department of Public Works will have to certify the adequacy of said system. We suggest that the wastewater flow from the subdivision be routed into the city owned McKee Road pump station. Said pump station is currently connected to the Kent County Pump Station No. 2. The County is in the process of constructing a parallel transmission main expanding the capacity needed to serve the City of Dover under the existing Contract User Agreement. In the future, the McKee Road pump station will be connected to this new parallel transmission main. Therefore, if the Chestnut Grove Farm subdivision will be connected to the McKee Road pump station, we have sufficient transmission and treatment capacity to serve the projected sewer flows of the proposed ma, Hons fede, P.E. ATTACHMENT E Director of Public Works ce: Scott Koenig, Director of Public Works, City of Dover VAPubiic Works\Municipalitiesdoverichesinutgrovelarmuti!. wad

DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC INFRASTURCTURE CRANBERRY RUN The following is a list of all public improvements which are to be accepted by the City of Dover: Sewer Utility Infrastructure (construction value = $179,228.00): 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer Main - 4,588 Lf. 6" PVC Sanitary Sewer Laterals - 2,555 Lf. (73 laterals) 4" PVC Sanitary Sewer Force Main - 1,397 Lf. (future use) 4' Diameter Sanitary Sewer Manholes - 21 ea. (152.54 v.f.) Water Utility Infrastructure (construction value = $160,050.00): 12" Ductile Iron Water Main - 997 Lf. 8" Ductile Iron Water Main - 5,565 1.f. 6" Ductile Iron Water Main - 220 Lf. 1" Type “K” Copper Water Service Line - 2,840 1.f. (73 services) 12" Gate Valves - 3 ea 8" Gate Valves - 16 ea. 6" Hydrant Valves - 9 ea. Fire Hydrants - 9 €a. Storm Water Infrastructure (construction value = $152,472.00): Catch Basins - 24 ea. 4' Storm Water Manholes -- 4ea (23.9 v.f) 15" Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 621 Lf. 18" Type Il Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 1,142 1.f. 21" Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 458 Lf. 24" Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 824 Lf. 27" Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 415 Lf 30" Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 90 Lf. Rights-of-Way: (0.86 miles) (construction value = $573,600.00): Cranberry Run Drive Station 0+00 to Station 8+38 Yarmouth Way Station 0+00 to Station 2+10 Falmouth Way Station 0+00 to Station 16+47 Chelsea Way Station 0+00 to Station 14+80 Somerset Circle Station 0+00 to Station 1+06 Tucket Circle Station 0+00 to Station 2+44 838 Lf. 2101£ 1,647 Lf. 1,480 Lf. 106 Lf. 244 Lf. 4,525 Lf. N #3

ATTACHMENT #4 Electric Rate Study Status Report Updated January 29, 2004 The Electric Rate Study Implementation Committee found that if we implemented the recommendations of the consultants including: proposed energy rates, demand rates, 95% power factor, the 100% Demand Ratcheting, and 25KV criteria for distinguishing between small and medium commercial customers total revenue would increase 11.93% or $6,317,544 more than projected by the consultant. Keep in mind new rates were to be revenue neutral as a whole. When analyzing why this occurred we determined that 1) Consultant appeared to not have factored in the impact of 100% ratcheting or the power factor when making the recommendations on energy and demand rates. 2) Also the consultant did not factor in the shifting of commercial customers from small to medium classes when applying the 25KV criteria. Based on our analysis to date the committee recommends the following: 1. Accepting the consultant’s recommendations for residential rate structure. The committee recommends increasing the rate from $.0880 to .0890. Our calculations indicated that without this slight adjustment, the rate would not cover cost of service and provide needed revenue. 2. Accepting the proposed energy rates and customer service charges proposed by consultant for all rates except primary (see #6 below). 3. Not accepting the consultant’s recommendation for 25K'V peak demand as the criteria for determining whether a customer is a small or medium commercial customer, this caused too much rate shifting resulting in higher cost to customers that were not anticipated by the consultant. The committee proposes keeping the current criteria of 3,500 kwh for two consecutive months. 4. Accepting the consultant’s recommendation for 95% power factor and 100% ratcheting for demand customers (medium commercial, large commercial, primary, transmission and special rates) as good practices to put into place, but we recommend reducing the proposed demand rates to equalize for the increase in cost caused by the power factor and ratcheting increases. 5. Accepting the consultant’s recommendation for billing demand based on a standard maximum 15-minute demand during the month. Currently, primary and special rates demands are based on a maximum 60-minute demand during the month.

6. Accepting recommendation of moving the Church rate, Agricultural Commercial Rate, and Municipal Rate customers into appropriate commercial classes, this actually caused an overall decrease in cost for these customers. Areas needing additional review: 1. We are continuing to analyze the impact on Primary Customers. When we applied the 95% power factor and the 100% Demand Ratcheting with modified demand rates we were able to bring the overall classes revenue up to the 4% recommended by the consultant. The problem we are having is that we found wide variations within the customers. Some customers saw increases of .604% while others were increased by 24.8%. We are currently examining ways to smooth the impact on this rate class. The study also recommended reincorporating three special rate customers back into this rate class. The large increases these customer’s are experiencing because of that is being analyzed and reviewed by the committee. Until we can examine this further the committee is uncomfortable making a recommendation. Update 1/29/04: e Playtex Apparel was moved to the primary rate. Their consumption was changed to reflect their decreased usage since March of 2003. e Playtex Products remains at their current rate with adjustment of power factor to 95% and an additional $1 charge for demand. e Tilcon is under contract. Therefore, their rate was changed back to their original contractual rate. e Continuing to examine the possibility of increasing the general primary tate to meet the 4% increase recommended by the Rate Study. 2. Impact on the Medium Commercial class was erratic with 96 out of 1,084 customers experiencing 50 % or larger percentage increases from current bills. We are examining why these large increases are occurring. Until this issue is resolved we are uncomfortable approving a demand charge for this class of customer. Update 1/29/04: e We removed 25K W minimum charge.