Ale nan kontni prensipal la
AskDover

Entèlijans atifisyèl (AI) tradui paj sa a. Pèsonn pa revize li, e li ka gen erè. Gade vèsyon angle a

CCW and Attachment

Council Committee of the Whole. 11 jen 2024.

Louvri PDF la

Yo rale tèks sa a nan PDF la otomatikman, epi li ka gen erè. PDF la se dosye ofisyèl la, kidonk tcheke l anvan ou konte sou sa a.

Paj 1

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE The Council Committee of the Whole met on June 11, 2024, at 6:06 p.m. with Council President Anderson presiding. Members of Council present were Ms. Arndt, Mr. Hare, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Neil (via WebEx), Dr. Pillsbury, and Mr. Rocha. Mr. Boggerty and Mr. Sudler were absent. Mayor Christiansen was also present. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Iriowen (Utility), and Mr. Shevock (via WebEx) (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). Mr. Pugh (Utility), and Mr. Garfinkel (Legislative, Finance, and Administration) were absent. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Ms. Arndt moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. Mayor and Council Reports – May 2024 First District Dr. Pillsbury reported that she has had several constituent concerns brought to her attention. She stated that all the issues have been resolved except for one. Mr. Rocha reported that he has been working closely with Dr. Pillsbury to address First District issues so that they are not doing double the work. Second District Mr. Lewis had no report to give. Mr. Hare had no report to give. Third District Ms. Arndt reported that she and Mr. Neil continue to represent council on the Downtown Dover Partnership Board and that she continues to represent council on the Unhoused Working Group with Councilman Rocha. She explained that she and Mr. Neil submitted a letter of support for the Luther Village Housing and Urban Development funding proposal. Finally, Ms. Arndt reported that she and Mr. Neil have answered several constituent issues and complaints. Mr. Neil provided his report electronically (Attachment #1). Fourth District Mr. Sudler was absent, no report was given. At-Large Mr. Boggerty was absent, no report was given. Mayor Christiansen Mayor Christiansen stated that he will not be submitting a report as the public knows the job that is being done.

Paj 2

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JUNE 11, 2024 PAGE 2 Council President Anderson Council President Anderson reported that there are a few constituent issues that are being worked on in the Fourth District. Mr. Anderson explained that the two main concerns are the house at 2 South Queen Street and several residents on North New Street. Mr. Anderson also reported that several issues have been raised with handicapped parking concerns. Mr. Anderson thanked the staff who worked on the budget, all the departments who brought forward legislation changes, and the City Clerk’s Office for making sure all of the proposed changes were placed in proper format, proofed, and available for what seemed like impossible deadlines. UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee met with Chairman Neil presiding. Adoption of Agenda Dr. Pillsbury moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Arndt and unanimously carried. Evaluation of Bids – FY24 Inflow & Infiltration Rehabilitation Project (Jason Lyon, Water/Wastewater Director) Mr. Jason Lyon, Water/Wastewater Director, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the Inflow and Infiltration Rehabilitation Project. Staff recommended awarding the contract to Insituform Technologies, LLC, for the City of Dover FY24 Inflow & Infiltration Rehabilitation Project, Bid #24-0031WW, for the amount of #1,279,530.00. Mr. Hare moved to recommend accepting the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Utility Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 6:16 p.m. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Chairman Rocha presiding. Adoption of Agenda Dr. Pillsbury moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Ms. Arndt and unanimously carried. Evaluation of Bids – Relay Panels for Garrison Oak Technology & Business Park (GOTBP) (Paul Waddell, Electric Director) Mr. Paul Waddell, Electric Director, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the Relay Panels for Garrison Oak Technology & Business Park. Staff recommended awarding the contract to Electrical Power Products, Bid #24-0028EL, for the amount of $251,201.00.

Paj 3

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JUNE 11, 2024 PAGE 3 Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Waddell stated that the project was budgeted for, and the entire project is currently running under budget. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Waddell stated that the substation would be dedicated solely to the business park. Mr. Waddell explained that currently there is one 50 Mega Volt Amp (MVA) transformer in the park. However, with the design of the substation, there is a provision to place a second transformer in the park if the load were to grow beyond 50 MVA. Adding a second transformer would also provide the ability to switch the load in the event of an emergency, or during an outage between Horse Pond Road and Dover Downs. Mr. Waddell explained that providing another transformer will not only provide power to the customers of the technology park but will enhance system resiliency. Mr. Hare moved to recommend accepting the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Ms. Arndt and unanimously carried. Discussion – Fiscal Year 2024 Audit Program (Patricia Marney, Interim Controller/Treasurer) Ms. Patricia Marney, Interim Controller/Treasurer, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the Fiscal Year 2024 Audit Program. Staff recommended accepting the Audit Program. Ms. Arndt moved to recommend accepting the audit program. The motion was seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried. Proposed Ordinance #2024-22 – Amending Chapter 26 – Businesses, Article II – Licenses, and Appendix F – Fees and Fines (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager) Mr. David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, and Kristen Mullaney, Licensing and Permitting Supervisor, reviewed the proposed changes in Ordinance #2024-22. Staff recommended approval of Proposed Ordinance #2024-22. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Hugg stated that all new fees and fines will be published on the city's website, in available materials, and made accessible to the public through calls or in-person visits. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Mullaney stated that license renewals will be issued in July, which is why the proposed changes are being discussed at this time. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Mullaney stated that currently, food trucks must obtain two licenses to operate as mobile food trucks. With the proposed changes, they will only have to obtain one license and pay one fee instead of two. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Mullaney stated that if they only do a one-time event in the city, they would not have to pay the full $180. Instead, they would still fall under the itinerant merchant license, as they do currently.

Paj 4

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JUNE 11, 2024 PAGE 4 Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Mullaney stated that the definition and fees for online sales were added due to an influx of people applying for that type of license. Ms. Mullaney stated that they currently do not have that type of license category therefore it was added to keep track of the license application. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Mullaney stated that he was correct and that there would be no way for them to enforce the license requirement and fees because they would not know if someone was operating an online business unless they came in to apply for that license. Ms. Mullaney explained that adding the permit is more for the record-keeping process. Mr. Hugg explained that certain home operations are covered under the zoning ordinance. Adding online businesses would allow those conducting business from home or in a residential district to obtain a license recognizing their home sales operation. Ms. Arndt requested that “warehouseman” be changed to warehouse operator. Mr. Anderson proposed amending the ordinance by removing lines 226, 227, 228, and the corresponding reference in Appendix F because it would be impossible to enforce, and it does not serve to improve the life of the city's people. Mayor Christiansen stated that he disagreed with Mr. Anderson's proposed amendment. Mr. Anderson moved to delete lines 226, 227, 228, and the corresponding reference in Appendix F. The motion was seconded by Ms. Arndt and unanimously carried. Mr. Anderson moved to accept and approve the ordinance as amended. The motion was seconded by Ms. Arndt and unanimously carried. Proposed Ordinance #2024-23 – Amending Chapter 106 – Traffic and Vehicles, Article I – In General, Sec. 106-14. – Off-road Motor Vehicle Regulations (Council President Anderson) Council President Anderson, and Thomas Johnson, Chief of Police, reviewed the background regarding the proposed changes in Ordinance #2024-23. Staff recommended approval of Proposed Ordinance #2024-23. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Chief Johnson stated that they could follow his recommendation to sell the vehicle and apply the proceeds to the Dover Strong Fund or another initiative benefiting the city's citizens. Chief Johnson explained that he also proposed creating a victim’s fund because off-road vehicles are often involved in accidents resulting in injuries and tragedies. Mayor Christiansen explained that all funds that come from the forfeiture of the vehicles should be directed back toward the citizens no matter the mechanism. He noted that many citizens have been victims of the renegade vehicles on the streets in one way or another. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Chief Johnson explained that his use of the word disposition was with the understanding that the vehicle would be sold versus disposed of.

Paj 5

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JUNE 11, 2024 PAGE 5 Responding to Mr. Rocha, Chief Johnson explained that if the ordinance passes, there would not be an increase in aggressive enforcement, such as chasing the vehicles. He elaborated that the strategy would involve investigating using technology and surveillance, and if the vehicles are in plain view, they would be subject to seizure. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Chief Johnson stated that the way the state law is written if any property owner gave permission and there was a violation on the private property then the violation would go to the property owner. If a juvenile were stopped on a city street the violation would go to the parent or guardian. Ms. Arndt moved to approve Ordinance #2024-23. The motion was seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. Proposed Ordinance #2024-24 – Amending Chapter 26 – Businesses, Article II – Licenses, Sec. 26-31. – Definitions, and Appendix F – Fees and Fines, Chapter 26 (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, and Ann Marie Townshend, Senior Project Manager at the Rossi Group) Mr. David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, and Ann Marie Townshend, Rossi Group, reviewed the background regarding the proposed changes in Ordinance #2024-24. Staff recommended approval of Proposed Ordinance #2024-24. Mr. Robert Coupe, Delaware Marijuana Commissioner, 540 N. Dupont Highway, Dover, emphasized that in Title 4 §1351, cities, towns, and municipalities have the authority to prohibit any of the regulated industries that his office is in charge of licensing. He further stated that 1351 also clarifies that the commissioner shall not issue a license unless the licensee has met the requirements of the local government where they plan to open their establishment. Mr. Coupe explained that there is a Certificate of Compliance, which ensures that his office does not approve a license unless the town has determined that the location meets whatever requirements that they have put in place. Mr. Coupe explained that his office is currently working on their regulations, which have been posted and are going through the state process that allows for public feedback. He stated that they received good feedback and made substantive changes, which will be posted again on the first of July. Mr. Coupe explained that Deputy Commissioner Paul Hyland spent a lot of time working on the regulations and they are close to what the final regulations will be. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Coupe stated that there were no major changes in the security section of the regulations. The only changes to the security section dealt with verbiage referring to diversion prevention plans. Mr. Coupe acknowledged that there are inherent dangers because dispensaries are mostly a cash business. He explained that most of the dispensaries that exist in Delaware have armed security in the building. They are required to have a vault, proper lighting, and video monitoring systems that allows direct access to Mr. Coupe’s office, as is currently required for the Office of Medical Marijuana. This setup enables live monitoring to ensure compliance with all necessary procedures. The dispensaries also must have plans for accidents, acts of violence, and active shooters. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Coupe stated that Deputy Hyland could speak more on medical marijuana because he oversaw the industry until he joined Mr. Coupe. However, Mr. Coupe explained that they do feel that the medical marijuana security provision has been successful over

Paj 6

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JUNE 11, 2024 PAGE 6 the last few years. Mr. Coupe explained that there is a bill, House Bill 425, that is proposed to be introduced in the coming weeks that will administratively move the Office of Medical Marijuana under the Office of the Marijuana Commissioner. This approach will enhance efficiency for the state by consolidating regulatory oversight under one agency for both offices. It also opens the possibility of merging the industries, resulting in a single retail center serving both medical patients and adult-use recreational customers. Mr. Paul Hyland, Deputy Commissioner, noted that having video surveillance inside and outside the compassion centers and marijuana businesses has proven beneficial. Law enforcement has frequently requested video footage for unrelated incidents captured by the cameras. This collaboration fosters a positive partnership between the Office of the Marijuana Commissioner and local law enforcement Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Coupe stated that he is unaware of any significant issues placing an additional burden on municipalities in responding to criminal incidents within the medical marijuana industry since its operationalization in 2015. He noted that nearly all the sites he has visited have armed security at the entrance and require the presentation of identification before entry. Additionally, he clarified that there is currently no provision in his budget for reimbursing a town or city for their response to a criminal incident. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Coupe explained that any incidents that do occur are reported to his office so they will be tracking any security incidents. Ms. Browyn Sherman, Transportation, and Community Planner at the Rossi Group reviewed the presentation entitled “City of Dover Recreational Marijuana Ordinances – Business Licensing & Zoning”. Ms. Anne Smith, 132 Oakmont Drive, Dover, expressed concerns about how marijuana cultivation can negatively affect the environment. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Ms. Townshend explained that the 500-foot buffer originally proposed touched every highway commercial property, so it was reduced to 250 feet. She noted that during the previous committee discussion, they were asked to avoid creating a buffer that would essentially prohibit the use within the city limits. The current wording requires the building footprint to be 250 feet from the residential zone, meaning that with a 500-foot buffer, there were few areas in the city where such use would be possible. Ms. Townshend clarified that while she acknowledges the viability of the policy position, it does not align with the direction given at the last Legislative, Finance, and Administration meeting. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Ms. Townshend stated that they looked at the C-4 zone because at the last committee meeting, it was discussed that it has the highest intensity of commercial use and that was the direction coming from the meeting. She also stated that there are options to not allow the use in the city however, it was not the direction provided when moving forward. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Ms. Townshend clarified that the buffer requirements were specifically for colleges, universities, schools, residential zones, and hospitals, and not for doctor's

Paj 7

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JUNE 11, 2024 PAGE 7 offices, pharmacies, restaurants, hotels, grocery stores, homeless shelters, churches, pawn shops, or shopping malls. Mr. Anderson stated that the council's decision to permit use in the C-4 zone was a compromise with the business community. He expressed that attempting to shadow ban it would contradict the will of the people as expressed through the council's vote. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sherman stated that there are only a couple of red buildings right outside of the military base that would be affected therefore at the direction of council they could add a thousand-foot buffer further protecting the base as an economic development venue. Mr. Anderson explained that many local state officials have been elected when campaigning on the issue of marijuana. He stated that if the city does nothing the state will decide what happens therefore it is better to develop regulations that restrict the businesses from being downtown, away from the schools and universities. Mayor Christiansen stated that it is everyone's responsibility to consider all information from constituents and the business community when making decisions. This ensures that decisions are well-informed and based on the information presented. Mr. Rocha suggested that there might be a need for further discussion regarding the distance restrictions, proposing a one-mile separation between retail marijuana stores within the city. He expressed concern about having an excessive number of marijuana stores similar to liquor stores. Additionally, Mr. Rocha agreed with Mr. Anderson, advocating for a buffer of a thousand feet from the Dover Air Force Base. Ms. Cynthia Christiansen, 714 Carol Street, Dover, expressed opposition to the proposed ordinances allowing the addition of marijuana retail stores in downtown Dover. Ms. Christiansen explained that as a long-time city resident, she could walk to school and smell chocolate coming from the General Foods plant and today children walk to school smelling marijuana. She stated that as a public-school educator, marijuana can be smelled at morning drop-offs, on the playground at recess, and the afternoon pickups. Ms. Christiansen expressed concerns with the lack of a buffer around Delaware State University, which has an elementary school, daycare centers, and churches. Ms. Christiansen emphasized her opposition to the ordinances and explained that people come to the city for the history, and it should be kept that way. Ms. Joan Denney, 350 N. State Street, Dover, expressed opposition to the proposed ordinances allowing the addition of marijuana retail stores in downtown Dover. Ms. Denney emphasized the concerns expressed by Ms. Christiansen. She also recalled hearing the past Governor of Texas, Ms. Dorothy Ann Richards speak regarding tobacco, and she expressed that if she had known how much harm tobacco use would cause, she would have never allowed it in Texas. Ms. Denney stated that the city should follow the municipalities down south and prohibit the sale of marijuana downtown. Mr. Adam Windett, 218 N. State Street, Dover, expressed his support for the proposed ordinances allowing the addition of marijuana retail stores in downtown Dover. Mr. Windett explained as a practicing attorney, local business owner, and cannabis consumer he strongly urges council to

Paj 8

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JUNE 11, 2024 PAGE 8 consider the proposed ordinances. He expressed opposition to the buffers as they are proposed because they limit the number of parcels to a few that are unsuitable for retail cannabis sales. Also, when factoring in a one-mile buffer they are further restricted. Mr. Windett referenced a 2022 study by Whitney Economics which found that the fewer the dispensaries per residence in a city, it is more likely that the city will have sales go through the illicit market. He explained that by creating a large one-mile buffer between the businesses, a buffer to the residential zones, and limiting the C-4 parcels will likely empower the illicit market. Ms. Lizzie Golob, 20476 Asheville Drive, Millsboro, expressed her opposition to the proposed ordinances as written because they contain very large restrictions on where dispensaries can go. She feels that cannabis is a natural plant and there should be no restrictions on where the businesses can establish their retail stores. Ms. Golob stated that the dispensaries are very safe and secure. Ms. Dina Vendetti, Central Delaware Chamber of Commerce (CDCC) President, 435 N. Dupont Highway, Dover, expressed opposition to the proposed ordinances allowing the addition of marijuana retail stores in downtown Dover. Ms. Vendetti explained that she has conducted some research and been in touch with chamber leaders across the country to find out what mistakes they feel they made so that Dover could learn from them. She stated that apart from one person, all of them said if Dover is interested in building a family-friendly, walkable, bikeable, downtown then allowing the retail sales of marijuana is not the way to go. She explained that there are close to 800 businesses in their membership, and they are concerned about what the ordinances will mean for their businesses. She stated that the CDCC and herself, as a resident of the City of Dover, remain opposed to the proposed ordinances. Ms. Vendetti explained that daycare centers, drug rehabs, and city parks should all be included in the restrictions. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Vendetti stated that he is correct, her opposition is to retail stores and cultivation. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Vendetti stated that he is correct, she does not have any opposition to the job intents surrounding testing in the manufacturing zone. She also stated that they are not opposed to medical marijuana either. Ms. Zoe Patchell, Delaware Cannabis Advocacy Network Executive Director, 218 N. State Street, Dover, expressed opposition to the ordinances as proposed as a City of Dover resident. Ms. Patchell stated that the ordinances create an overly restrictive zoning for legal cannabis businesses in Dover. She explained that cannabis was legalized in the State of Delaware and had the overwhelming support of the residents of the State of Delaware. She proposed that legal cannabis businesses be zoned like alcohol businesses. Ms. Patchell explained that cannabis is safer than alcohol in every metric and heavily restricting where legal businesses can operate, ensures that the illicit market prospers. In closing, Ms. Patchell stated that the debate about whether cannabis should be legal or not has already occured, and it was passed. She strongly urged council to consider the legal businesses that are regulated in one of the most scrutinized industries in the state by a former law enforcement officer and reconsider the overly restricted zoning ordinances. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Patchell stated that the proposed ordinances should contain more reasonable buffer zones between schools, and they should be more aligned with the alcohol zoning requirements.

Paj 9

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JUNE 11, 2024 PAGE 9 Mr. Ethan Whitsett, 226 Chenault Court, Dover, explained that he felt that the buffers are reasonable, however, there are no opportunities for a retail market if there is no area for cultivation. Mr. Whitsett stated that the city could benefit from the industrial economy of the cannabis industry. Ms. Lachelle Paul, 501 Silverside Drive, Wilmington, emphasized the importance of council reaching out to constituents and business owners to gather their input before making any decisions. Ms. Paul stated that regarding the sales of marijuana, there is a need to control the type of marijuana being sold as opposed to the street version that may be laced with fentanyl. Ms. Paul explained that even though marijuana is legal, boundaries still need to be outlined concerning its use. Mr. Hare expressed his agreement with Ms. Paul, stating that he believed more research should be conducted to understand the desires of the constituents. Mr. Hare moved to defer Proposed Ordinance #2024-24 and #2024-25 to a future meeting and asked that the meeting be a Special Legislative, Finance, and Administration meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis and unanimously carried. Proposed Ordinance #2024-25 – Amending Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Sec. 16 – Highway Commercial Zone (C-4), Sec. 19 – Manufacturing Zone (M), Sec. 20 – Industrial Park Manufacturing Zone (IPM), Sec. 23 – Agricultural Zone (A), Article 5 – Supplementary Regulations, and Article 12 – Definitions (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, and Ann Marie Townshend, Senior Project Manager at the Rossi Group) Mr. David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, and Ann Marie Townshend, Rossi Group, reviewed the background regarding the proposed changes in Ordinance #2024-25. Staff recommended approval of Proposed Ordinance #2024-25. Mr. Hare moved to defer Proposed Ordinance #2024-24 and #2024-25 to a future meeting and asked that the meeting be a Special Legislative, Finance, and Administration meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis and unanimously carried. Mr. Rocha moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 8:36 p.m. Mr. Anderson moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 8:36 p.m. David L. Anderson Council President Attachments Attachment #1 - Mr. Neil’s 3rd District Report.

Paj 10

ATTACHMENT #1 Council Committee of the Whole Meeting of 06/11/2024 Walls, Ashley A From: FRED Neil <fredneilbooks@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 12:55 PM To: Walls, Ashley A Subject: EXTERNAL: 3rd District Report WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ashley, I don't know if this should be read aloud or can be placed in the minutes of the meeting as my report for the 3rd District for the record. If it is referred to and not read, I would be happy. Fred Neil 3rd District Dover City Council 302-678-3288 Councilman Fred Neil, 3rd District report for June 12, 2024 May: Attended Governor’s Dover Days breakfast but was rained out of the Dover Day Parade when 1932 Fire Engine was a No-Show ● Participated in May 7th Chase Bank Ribbon Cutting Rt 13 & Leipsic Hwy ● Attended CDCC Awards Certificates Gov Office, in Leg Hall ● Attended Ceremony of Opening of the Electric Charging Station for City EV Fleet vehicles behind City Hall ● Attended Kent/Dover Tourism Meeting June: DDP Open House at Library at 1st Session on the planned Mobility Center ● DEMEC Report to Municipalities with Councilman Rocha in Smyrna ● Responded to Tahali Nichols, Founder and Executive Director of NXTGEN 302, for a possible presentation on cutting down on violence at a future meeting sshared with Council President & others. I am sure others have been approached as well. ● Responded o U.S. Veteran Builder and Associates LLC solicitation to clean up the debris in city that was sent to the members of the city council. ● Responded to complaint about Recycling container lids left open by the recycling company workmen after they empty them causing them to be filled by rain. Fast response from Assistant City Manager Duca. ● Sent a joint letter with Councilwoman Arndt of endorsement for HUD grant for Luther Towers expansion, ● Responded to Senator Coons’ office request along with Council membrrs Arndt and Boggerty regarding Housing/Rental Assistance and for tenant in Persimmon Tree Apartments Application Fee. ● Responded to complaint about a shopping cart on the road in the East lake development on Lakeview Drive. ● Responded to an inquiry about the Phish Concert scheduled in the Firefly grounds. Answers were supplied by Gary Camp, Speedway staff, The best place to direct folks with questions regarding the Mondegreen (Phish) Festival is their INFO page on their website, which includes a lengthy FAQ too: https://mondegreen.phish.com/info/ 1

Paj 11

● Responded to a series of emails regarding the replacement of water lines in an alley that has been a stop and start process pver a period time that has left the alley a mess, The alley is between West and Carol Streets. As usual, Jason Lyons is doing the follow as promptly as possible, Shared with Coucilwoman Arndt. ● Responded to a series of inquiries as a result of the water survey sent by the water department as part of the Federal requirements, each water provider is required to obtain inventory of all water service material. Thanks to Jason Lyons. ● Responded to a series of a compalint as to who is responsible maintenance of the water ditch surrounding the Wild Meadows community. Thanks to Jason Lyons. ● Sent out 2 Alerts from Councilwoman Arndt and me to 3rd District Civic and HOA leaders to be shared with there members. One dealt with new activities on the Speedway grounds. The 2nd was a Know-B-4 warning we received. 2

Tounen nan reyinyon sa a