PC Paperless Packet

CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, April 19, 2021 at 7:00 PM Virtual Meeting AGENDA Written comments are accepted via mail to City of Dover – Planning Commission, P.O. Box 475 Dover DE 19903 and via email at CompPlan@dover.de.us. VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE The Planning Commission Meeting for April 19, 2021 will be held only as a Virtual Meeting using WebEx. Representatives of each Project Application will receive a specific invitation to attend this meeting. Regular Planning Commission member participants will receive a specific invitation to attend the meeting as a Panelist. The public is welcome to attend the Meeting using the Public Participation Information given below. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION City of Dover Planning Commission Meeting of April 19, 2021 Dial: 1-408-418-9388 Event number/Access code: 129 886 1139 Event password: DoverPC Event Address: http://bit.ly/PCMeeting041921 If you are new to WebEx get the app now at https://www.webex.com/ to be ready when the meeting starts. For problems accessing the meeting, please call the Planning Office at (302) 736- 7196. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ADOPTION OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Adoption of Minutes of March 15, 2021 COMMUNICATIONS & REPORTS 1

PLANNING COMMISSION - April 19, 2021 PAGE 2 Meeting Reminder: The next Planning Commission regular meeting date is Monday, May 17, 2021 at 5:30PM. Please note the earlier start time due to volume of agenda items including the Comprehensive Rezoning 2021 Project and Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2021 Set #2. Update on City Council Actions Department of Planning & Inspections Updates 2. Implementation of 2019 Comprehensive Plan - New Revised Maps Education and Training Opportunities 3. University of Delaware: Institute for Public Administration Training Sessions OPENING REMARKS CONCERNING MEETING PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATIONS OLD BUSINESS Request Extension of Planning Commission Approval 4. S-19-07 - Retail Facility at 515 South DuPont Highway – Request for 1-year Extension of Plan Approval granted by the Planning Commission in April 2019 for a Site Development Plan Application to permit construction of a one-story 8,050 SF retail building and accompanying site improvements. The site is currently vacant. The subject area is 0.91 +/- acres located on the east side of South DuPont Highway south of Cowgill Street and north of Public Safety Boulevard. The property is zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone). The owner of record is Kent Del Properties, LLC. Property Address: 515 South DuPont Highway. Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.00-01-12.00-000. Council District 2. Pending Development Application: 5. C-21-02 JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center at 756 South Little Creek Road – Continued Review for an Application for a Conditional Use to permit renovation of a 10,111 SF space in an existing one-story 33,143 SF building into a Child Day Care Center to serve 170 children. The property consists of a 2.39 acre+/- parcel and is located on the south side of South Little Creek Road opposite Babb Drive. The property is zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone). The owner of record is Empire Medical, LLC and the applicant is JJ’s Learning Experience 2. Location Address: 756 South Little Creek Road Suite 1. Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.00-01-03.00-000. Council District 2. This Application had originally been submitted for Review by the Planning Commission at their March 2021 meeting, however Action was deferred pending further information being provided by the Applicant. NEW APPLICATIONS 6. Z-21-03 Lands of Silver Linings Holding Corporation at 630 W. Division Street - Public Hearing and Review for Recommendation to City Council on a rezoning application for a parcel of land consisting of 1.0853 acres (47,275.3 SF +/-). The properties are zoned C-3 (Service Commercial Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning is C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The property is located on the south side of West Division Street and 2

PLANNING COMMISSION - April 19, 2021 PAGE 3 opposite the intersection with Ridgely Street. The owner of record is Silver Linings Holding Corporation c/o Tolano Anderson. Property Address: 630 W. Division Street. Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.08-01-40.01-000. Council District 4. Ordinance #2021-07. This property was the subject of Rezoning Application Z-20-03 that was unsuccessful in its rezoning request for IO (Institutional and Office Zone) with COZ-1 in November-December 2020. 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property (Revision of March 25, 2021) - Public Hearing and Review of a proposed Site Development Master Plan Application to permit construction of 453 new parking spaces over the course of three phases for the Bayhealth Medical Center Campus. This expands the existing parking from 227 spaces to a total of 680 parking spaces on the Scull Property. Phase 1 proposes 251 new parking spaces; Phase 2 proposes 72 new parking spaces; and Phase 3 proposes an additional 91 parking spaces and a connection to S. State Street at the South Street intersection. The Plan shows the demolition of existing buildings in each phase for a total of seven (7) buildings demolished including the Scull Mansion to accommodate the increased volume of parking. The Revision offers a proposal related to the Scull Mansion. The properties measure 11.43 acres +/- and are located on the east side of S. State Street in the block between South Street and Scull Terrace. The properties are zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and subject to the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone). The owners of record are Bayhealth Medical Center, Inc. and KGH Development Corp. The parcels are proposed to be consolidated before the project begins. Property Addresses: 605 S. State Street, 625 S. State Street, 100 Scull Terrace, and 150 Scull Terrace. Tax Parcel Numbers: ED-05-077.13-01-49.00-000 and ED-05-077.13-01-51.00- 000. Council District 2. Waiver Requests: Elimination of Upright Curbing and the Elimination/Relocation of Bicycle Parking. This Application was withdrawn by the applicant from the October 2020 Meeting of the Planning Commission. A Revision submission dated March 25, 2021 has been received for review. NEW BUSINESS ADJOURN Posted Agenda: Friday, April 9, 2021 THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. PURSUANT TO 29 DEL. C. §10004(e)(2), THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, WHICH ARISE AT THE TIME OF THE MEETING 3

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 15, 2021 The Meeting of the City of Dover Planning Commission was held on Monday, March 15, 2021 at 7:00 PM as a Virtual Meeting using the phone/videoconferencing system WebEx due to Delaware’s Declaration of the State of Emergency for COVID-19. The Meeting Session was conducted with Chair Mrs. Maucher presiding. Members present were Mr. Adams, Mr. Roach, Mrs. Malone, Mr. Hartman, Mr. Baldwin, Mrs. Lord, Mrs. Welsh, Dr. Jones and Mrs. Maucher. Staff members present were Mr. Dave Hugg, Mrs. Dawn Melson-Williams, Mr. Julian Swierczek, Mrs. Samantha Bulkilvish, Mrs. Tracey Harvey, Mr. Jason Lyon and Mrs. Kristen Mullaney. Also present were Ms. Shawanda Johnson, Mr. Jeff Speigleman, Mr. Doug Liberman, Ms. Michelle Marinucci and Mr. Jonathan Street. Speaking from the public were Mr. Allan Angel, Mr. Michael Petit de Mange, and Ms. Karen Vicks. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mrs. Welsh moved to approve the Agenda tonight, seconded by Mr. Adams and the motion was unanimously carried 9-0. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 16, 2021 Mrs. Welsh moved to approve the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of February 16, 2021, seconded by Mr. Adams and the motion was unanimously carried 9-0. COMMUNICATIONS & REPORTS Mr. Hugg stated that the next Planning Commission regular meeting is scheduled for Monday, April 19, 2021 at 7:00PM. Mr. Hugg provided an update on the regular City Council and various Committee meetings held on February 22 & 23, 2021 and March 8 & 9, 2021. Mr. Hugg stated that they are all generally coming back to work in the office; some people are still working at home and part time in the office. The building is open for business; the lobby only. They are taking applications and plans submissions in the lobby personally as opposed to remotely or just in the vestibule. However, we are still conducting all of our meetings in a virtual format; that includes Pre-Application meetings, site meetings, and the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment and Historic District Commission meetings. OPENING REMARKS CONCERNING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Mrs. Melson-Williams presented the audience information on policies and procedures for the Virtual Meeting using the WebEx system. OLD BUSINESS 1) Requests for Extensions of Planning Commission Approval: None NEW APPLICATIONS 1 4

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 C-21-02 JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center at 756 South Little Creek Road - Public Hearing and Review of an Application for Conditional Use to permit renovation of a 10,111 SF space in an existing one-story 33,143 SF building into a Child Day Care Center to serve 170 children. The property consists of a 2.39 acre+/- parcel and is located on the south side of South Little Creek Road opposite Babb Drive. The property is zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone). The owner of record is Empire Medical, LLC and the applicant is JJ’s Learning Experience 2. Location Address: 756 South Little Creek Road Suite 1. Tax Parcel: ED- 05-077.00-01-03.00-000. Council District 2. Representative: Ms. Shawanda Johnson, JJ’s Learning Experience; Mr. Jeff Spiegelman, Real estate representative Mrs. Harvey stated that the Conditional Use Site Plan Review is to permit the renovation of an existing 10,000 SF space in an existing one-story 33,000 SF building into a Child Day Care Center to serve 170 children and 19 adult staff. The building is located on the south side of South Little Creek Road opposite of Babb Drive. The owner of record is Empire Medical, LLC and the applicant is Ms. Shawanda Johnson. The property address is 756 South Little Creek Road. The plan identifies an outdoor play area that will be fenced in on the south side of the building. There are two areas of existing pavement to be utilized as parking lots for a total of 73 spaces on the site. The property is zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone) with the existing footprint of the building not changing or enlarging. There is direct access to the site; one to the large parking lot on the west side of the building and one to the proposed parking area on the east side of the building. There are two entry ways and exits off of South Little Creek Road. These entrances must be evaluated by DelDOT for any necessary improvements. Dumpsters for trash and recycling collection are required for the property. The plan identifies the two dumpster locations for the building with the concrete pad and enclosure. There is an existing sidewalk and curbing along South Little Creek Road. There is currently no sidewalk on South Little Creek Road serving as direct access to this site. For the Day Care Center on the east side of the building, the entire parking lot is paved. Access is proposed to the building with the construction of steps and a ramp on the east side of the building. The Planning Commission may prescribe appropriate conditions for establishment of the use. Mr. Hartman questioned the lighting for the building on the east side. Since the Day Care will be open until 7PM some nights, has there been any consideration of the lighting requirements on that side of the building? Responding to Mr. Hartman, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that any commercial establishment should have lighting that lights the parking lot areas. She is not sure if there are any wall-mounted fixtures on that side of the building. If there is not, then there may need to be freestanding lighting for that side but that is something that they can certainly confirm. There may be street lighting along South Little Creek Road in that area that may assist in lighting some of the property. Mr. Hartman stated that they are all concerned with the safety of the children and he is sure that Ms. Johnson is concerned with that as well. The parking lot appears to be pretty tight so he was thinking that lighting should be addressed by the applicant for the safety of the children. He has another question regarding handicapped parking which is not on the east side of the building at 2 5

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 all. Why is there no handicapped accessible parking near the ramp on the east side of the building? Responding to Mr. Hartman, Ms. Johnson stated that she does not believe that there is any lighting located next to the building but they do have plans to have some freestanding lighting out there as well as in the parking area. That is a requirement from the Office of Child Care Licensing as well; from the time that you are open and during evening hours to have it well lit. As far as the handicapped space parking, she does know that they have a ramp but she does not see the handicapped parking available on that side but that is something that she can address as well with the architect. Mr. Hartman further questioned the position of the dumpster. Again, that is a tight area and when they are emptying that dumpster, it appears that they are backing up towards the entrance to the Child Care Center and he is concerned about the safety of the children when that occurs. Responding to Mr. Hartman, Ms. Johnson stated that normally during the dumpster hours as far as emptying, if children are not there except for when parents are dropping off. They are only really going to be out there in the playground area which has to be childproof locked on both sides. We have to have two exits but they also have to be childproofed. Really the only issue would be dropping off and picking up which they should be supervised by their parents at that time. Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that in this case, the trash collection and recycling collection would be a private hauler so they would have to work with the property owner or tenant about pickup options. Depending on if the truck needs to access on the front on or a side, there certainly may be an opportunity to reposition that. You could request that they look at doing so. Mr. Hartman stated that he would request Ms. Johnson to work with either the Planning Office or the private collector to make sure that the children who are entering or exiting that entrance are not put in danger by the trash truck. Mrs. Maucher opened the public hearing. Mr. Allan Angel – Levy Court Commissioner for Kent County Mr. Angel stated that he is a Levy Court Commissioner and he knows this area very well. As Chair of Economic Development and or Levy Court for Kent County, he loves to see businesses, small and large flourish; however, a Day Care with 170 children at this location raises some major concerns. The first concern is traffic; bringing children in and dropping them off is an issue because that area is so traffic heavy because of John Hunn Brown Road and South Little Creek Road. It is very congested and hard to get in and out of at times and sometimes you see a little road rage when you are sitting there for long periods of time. Our County walking trails back right up to this property where the public individuals can be close to children. He would hope that the applicant will put a fence up for safety. The homeless are living in that area and urinating and defecating up to the tree line at the war memorial in that area. Since only a portion of that building is going to be utilized, the unknown of what else could be part of that building leaves an uncertainty of what else could be next to those children in that Day Care. Finally, our most precious cargo are our children and they need to be in a safe environment. 3 6

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 Mr. Michael Petit de Mange – County Administrator for Kent County Mr. Petit de Mange stated that he wasn’t aware that Mr. Angel was going to be speaking tonight and he thinks that he covered most of his concerns. The only point that he wants to share with the Commissioners is about the outdoor play area that is planned to be fenced. He was wondering if the fencing will continue all the way to entrance/exit of the building where the children will be coming and going. He could not make that out from the plan and it was a little unclear to him if the fencing just kind of ends at the building as a gate. If that’s the case, they would be concerned about children going to and from the Day care to the play area. It looks like they would have to walk out and into the fire lane to get there. He shared the plans with Levy Court leadership and that was one concern that was noted. Other than that, he thinks that the use would be a good neighbor and they certainly support child care activities. East Dover Elementary is in the area also and their playground is fenced in as well. They have never had any concern with (children at the school) getting out into traffic there and they would like to see the same consideration here at this facility. Responding to Mr. Petit de Mange, Ms. Johnson stated that the exit from the building to the playground is right near the playground. So towards the end where the children will be entering, you literally come down a hall, come out and step right into the playground on both sides. Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that they do go through an area that is not totally fenced from the building into the play area but there is a short distance where they would obviously be under teacher control to make that gap happen. Responding to Mrs. Melson-Williams, Ms. Johnson stated that the playground was a few steps from the building. Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that you do not open a door directly to the play area because that door is likely serving as egress purposes as well. Mr. Petit de Mange stated that it did answer the question but it did not satisfy the concern. There is a space between the entrance/exit and the playground that is not fenced. That is really the point that we wish to raise just for safety purposes and also Mr. Hartman mentioned the fire lane and the access to the dumpsters as well. He just thinks that it is important, particularly when you are dealing with youngsters and a sizeable number of them, that the fence be contiguous to entrance/exit where they are coming and going so that no mishaps occur. Mrs. Lord questioned how many feet is the exit of the building to the fence of the playground? Approximately how many feet will the teachers and the children have to travel to get to the playground? Responding to Mrs. Lord, Ms. Johnson stated that the back entrance would be the main entrance, not the one that is by the fire lane which will only be used for fire drills or emergencies. They will mainly use the back entrance but she believes that there is approximately five feet between the entrance and the fence for the playground. Mr. Spiegelman asked if they could zoom out on the drawing because there may be a scale to determine exactly how far it is. More importantly, when we are saying “back entrance”, what they are talking about is the entrance on the east side of the building. In the playground area directly to the south, there is a set of steps and so it is kind of tucked away behind the fence. That allows for an added level of security but also importantly, they need to be careful about fencing in a potential exit because of fire violations. The idea is that the kids need to be able to get out 4 7

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 rather than into a fenced in area in case of an emergency. A lot of times it is actually added safety to have a short walk such as this directly to it. If everything on the plan is to scale, then they could argue that it is half of a dumpster length or it is about the width of a parking spot; so, probably less than 10 feet. Mrs. Lord stated that when you are making sure that they have egress from the building without having to scale a fence should there be a fire or other emergency, that is a fairly short distance to go. She knows that they have all seen Day Cares where the children hold hands and are sort of herded in and herded out. It’s not like they are just running out there to the playground on their own. From her perspective, she does not see that being a possible safety threat. Mr. Petit de Mange asked if someone could point on the elevation where that exit is. It looks like you would have to walk out of the building into the fire lane to get to the playground, but he may be mistaken. Responding to Mr. Petit de Mange, Mr. Spiegelman stated that the east entrance is going to be the main entrance to move kids from the Day Care into the playground. There is a hallway where kids would go out from the Day Care to the exit that is going to be at the east side of the building and enter the playground from the south. That is going to be the main entrance, thereby avoiding the kids being anywhere near the fire lane at all. Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that she is not sure that the elevation shows the depiction of improvements that are planned on the east side of the building. Responding to Mrs. Melson- Williams, Mr. Petit de Mange stated that he sees new steps there and they are right at the edge of the fire lane. Mrs. Maucher closed the public hearing. Mr. Hartman moved to postpone application C-21-02 JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center at 756 South Little Creek Road until the next meeting so that issues involving the parking, the lighting, the traffic flow and the children’s access to the playground can be reviewed and formalized and presented again to the Commission, seconded by Mr. Adams and the motion was carried 9-0 by roll call vote. Mr. Hartman voting yes; based on the concerns with the safety of the children. Mr. Baldwin voting yes; based on the safety issues. Mrs. Lord voting yes; based on reasons previously stated. Mrs. Welsh voting yes; she thinks it is best to clarify what is happening with the issue of children being escorted to the playground. Dr. Jones voting yes; she would say that due to the safety of the children she has to vote in favor of the motion but she believes that Ms. Johnson will come back with appropriate information that is probably already there. Mr. Roach voting yes; he appreciates them trying to bring forth a child care facility to this area because it is a much needed addition to the City. He is not as concerned about some of the concerns but it is just more clarity. Working at on elementary school, he definitely knows why the fire lanes are close to the building but he would definitely like more clarity on the lighting and the parking spaces. Mr. Adams voting yes; he would tell the applicant to please not be discouraged. They are excited about the project, but he just thinks there is just a little more information that they need in order to move forward. Mrs. Malone voting yes; for reasons stated. Mrs. Maucher voting yes; for reasons provided in the motion. 5 8

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 C-21-03 Warehouse Building at College Business Park Lot D – Public Hearing and Review of Conditional Use Site Development Plan to permit construction of a 9,520 SF one story Commercial Warehouse Building with associated site improvements on a 0.9907 acre +/- parcel. The property is zoned M (Manufacturing Zone). The property is located north of College Road, at the end of College Park Drive, abutting the southwest side of the railroad right-of-way. The owner of record is Stoltzfus LLC (HSM Exchange LLC). Property Address: 1255-1257 College Park Drive. Tax Parcel: ED-05-067.00-02-12.06-000. Council District 4. Consideration of Performance Standards Review Application. Waiver Request: Partial Elimination of Upright Curbing. Application C-15-03 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless at 1255 College Park Drive approved by Planning Commission in August 2015 and Final Plan Approval on January 11, 2016 developed a telecommunications monopole (Towed Based Wireless Communications Facility) on the property. Representative: Mr. Doug Liberman, Larson Engineering Mr. Swierczek stated that this is a proposal for a warehouse building on Lot D in College Business Park off of College Road. Currently on the site, there is an existing telecommunications monopole (cell tower). This structure is proposed to remain. There is also a trailer present on the site which will be removed to accommodate this. With the proposal Site Plan submitted, the applicants have also submitted a Partial Elimination of Upright Curbing Waiver Request as well as a Performance Standards Review Application which is required for development in a Manufacturing Zone. For parking on the property, the site in general has not had a specific tenant identified yet so for specific items that are sometimes required based on employees or square footage totals, they would have to assess that based on square footage. The applicant is showing that they are being compliant with the minimum required parking by providing twelve parking spaces. They have added details noting that they will be providing bicycle parking as required. At the moment, they are identifying one loading area shown at the top of the Site Plan which is sort of to the northeast of the property. For this loading area, once again, there are requirements that are based generally on square footage or the type of use there. This does meet minimum requirements. Once a tenant is identified and they go through the permit process, they will be obviously assessing this to see if it is efficient enough for what they are proposing. The Partial Elimination of Upright Curbing submitted as a Waiver Request does pertain to that loading space area as it does partially overlap an easement for stormwater drainage. They have indicated to the applicant that any proposed developments should ensure that it is not going to impede stormwater management there at all. It might look a little confusing where you see the entrance of the site. The drive that this is on, College Park Drive, is not a City maintained road nor is it DelDOT. It is a privately maintained road. On the plans that were submitted by the applicant, they did show that what was recorded as right-of-way is not actually what was built as right-of- way. What was recorded was that slightly larger cul-de-sac feature that ends a little lower down. However, what was built is that slightly smaller cul-de-sac that extends closer to the edge of the property lines. They did advise the applicant that they could revise their Site Plan submission to reflect that; however, they will have to ensure that any easements be recorded as necessary which will be part of the plan review process moving forward. They did also provide some building architecture. It does show elevations of each of the four sides of the building. It does not note anything like materials. It does give a general indication to things like doors, windows, and garages (doors). That will be more specifically identified once a tenant is identified for the space. 6 9

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 As a note, if anyone was sort of looking into this property, there did appear to be woodlands on the site in the not too distant past; however, the applicant has submitted some information with the public notice requirement that shows that the woodland was in fact lost to the recent storms that impacted that area. To the waivers submitted and the Performance Standards Review Application, it is noted that the Partial Elimination of Upright Curbing is an administrative Waiver that is at the prevue of Planning Staff to approve. As a note to the members of the Commission, Staff has approved it. They are also recommending approval of the Performance Standards Review Application, believing that the form submitted by the applicant sufficiently demonstrates the intent to comply with the restrictions on objectionable elements as noted in the Zoning Ordinance, Article 5, Section 8.1 and 8.2. Mr. Liberman stated that they have a Conditional Use Site Plan for a contractor’s warehouse on an approximately one acre lot. Mr. Swierczek just about covered everything for this application. They have the required parking and they have extended the sidewalk along the frontage. They have relocated the right-of-way to match the existing cul-de-sac that is out there. They have added a bike rack. The drive aisles out front are suited for the contractor warehouse use. They have a 28 foot wide drive aisle as opposed to a 24 foot wide and they added an additional 8 foot concrete apron to help with maneuverability for the contractors using the site. He appreciates the approval of the waiver. That area is really from the trash dumpster heading east away from the building. The stormwater will sheet flow across that paved area to the stormwater pond located just south of the building. They did submit the Performance Standards Review Application. Like Mr. Swierczek said, they do not have tenants at this point but given the Performance Standards for dangerous and objectionable elements, he doesn’t think that Mr. Stoltzfus would want to have anyone in the building that is going to be using or generating the items listed within the City of Dover Code. Fire and explosion hazards, radioactivity, noise, vibration, smoke and all of that type of stuff just isn’t good for the area. He does not feel that they would be putting anyone in there who would want to generate anything like that. Mr. Swierczek had a comment on the architecture. It is to be a metal building. This building is industrial or manufacturing in use so a metal building will be sufficient for what is needed out there and given the location of this building at the very end of College Park Drive. Mr. Hartman stated that the Performance Standards (responses) that are provided are very open. He understands that since they don’t know what kind of tenants are going in there, but the Commission is tasked with approving the Performance Standards. He would just like to know that somebody along the line, either the City level or the applicant, will be verifying that the tenants will be at least aware of the Performance Standards so that they can comply with them. Some of the Performance Standards involve solid waste and things of that nature which are throughout the area. He would like to just understand who at the City or who at the applicant’s level will be ensuring that the tenants will be aware of the Performance Standards and will at least understand that there are Performance Standards to be complied with. Responding to Mr. Hartman, Mr. Swierczek stated that once the building is constructed and a tenant is identified, whenever they move into this location it has to go through a permit review process. Any permit for something like that does have to come to the Planning Office for review. At that stage, they will review it to ensure that whatever is being proposed onsite is compliant with the Performance Standards Review and is compliant with what the applicant has submitted. If it is not compliant, that would obviously stop that from proceeding further until their concerns could be addressed 7 10

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 on that end. Mrs. Maucher opened a public hearing and after seeing no one wishing to speak, closed the public hearing. Mrs. Welsh moved to approve application C-21-03 Warehouse Building at College Business Park Lot D for the addition of a 9,520 SF commercial warehouse building, inclusive of all DAC comments, the Waiver Request for the Partial Elimination of Upright Curbing and the Performance Standard Review Application, seconded by Mrs. Malone and the motion was carried 9-0 by roll call vote. Mrs. Welsh voting yes; it seems to be a good use of the area and space. Dr. Jones voting yes; she agrees that we should keep an eye on compliance with the Performance Standards. Mr. Adams voting yes; for reasons previously stated. Mr. Roach voting yes; for reasons previously stated. Mrs. Malone voting yes; for reasons previously stated. Mr. Hartman voting yes; he agrees with the commentary that the Planning Office provided. Mr. Baldwin voting yes. Mrs. Lord voting yes; for reasons previously stated. Mrs. Maucher voting yes; based on Staff comments and the reasons stated in the motion. S-21-02 Academy of Dover Charter School at 104 Saulsbury Road - Public Hearing and Review of a proposed Site Development Plan Application to permit construction of a 7,072 SF one story School Building behind an existing 37,960 SF School Building. The Plan also shows additional landscaping to meet code requirements. The property measures 4.757 acres +/- and is located on the west side of Saulsbury Road approximately 900 feet north of Forrest Avenue. The property is zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and is subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The owner of record is Dover School LLC. Address: 104 Saulsbury Road. Tax Parcel Number: ED-05-076.07-01-27.00-000. Council District 1. Waiver Request: Elimination of Fence Component of Opaque Barrier and Alternative Format of Opaque Barrier. The property was originally developed with Site Plan S-02-27 Dover Academy Charter School approved by Planning Commission October 21, 2002. Representatives: Mr. Doug Liberman, Larson Engineering; Ms. Michele Marinucci, Principal for Academy of Dover Mr. Baldwin recused himself from this application as his daughter works for Academy of Dover Charter School. Mrs. Bulkilvish stated that this application is for a Site Plan for an additional school building on the property located at 104 Saulsbury Road. This property was previously developed under Site Plan S-02-27 for the Dover Academy Charter School and the property is zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and is subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The property has been developed in accordance with the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) so a lot of the features that are required for that are already established. Currently, there is a 7,072 SF building being proposed at the rear of the existing 37,960 SF building. In addition, they are proposing some pedestrian linkages around the building to get students safely to the play area located even further to the rear of the property without having to pass through the parking area. The applicant is also requesting a Waiver for the Elimination of the Fence Component of the Opaque Barrier requirements as well as Alternative Format of Opaque Barrier. They have submitted their request 8 11

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 in writing as well as a diagram showing the existing conditions on the property. When this was previously developed, the property to the south was zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and it has since been rezoned and now requires that Opaque Barrier along the south boundary. It is heavily vegetated; and therefore, the applicant is requesting that Waiver for the Opaque Barrier. They are proposing additional plantings in that area to create a thicker vegetative barrier in places where it may be thinned out. Previously approved too was a Waiver for the Opaque Barrier with the original Site Plan for the western property line as it is heavily wooded there and that also butts up to a residential area. Mr. Liberman stated that this is for a 7,520 SF freestanding classroom addition to provide space for up to 60 students. He thinks that they were looking to add approximately four new employees along with the expansion so there is not a large demand on the parking lot that already exists. The parking will not be changed from what is originally proposed there because parking is based off of the size of the auditorium and that is not changing. The site is located in the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) and meets the site layout, landscaping and architectural requirements of the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). Utilities for water and sewer are being extended from the existing services that are serving the existing building. They are asking for a Waiver of the Fence Component of the Opaque Barrier requirements along the south and west property lines. These areas are heavily wooded and the same waiver was granted previously. The buffer has only gotten thicker with time. The zoning on the southern property line actually changed after the site was constructed so the fence then became a requirement. It was actually after our site was already built that the fence requirement came in. It will be very costly to have to remove all of the vegetation along our property line that is 700 feet long and then install trees and shrubs and the fence; it just doesn’t seem like a good use of time and money to be able to do that. Additionally, it seems like the fence component screens the parking lot from the residential use and the building is essentially going to be covering or screening the parking lot from the senior apartments to the south. The DAC comments were fine. Ms. Marinucci stated that their plan with this expansion of our Academy is to have a minimum impact to those around us while we are also providing a major impact to the families that they serve. This really just allows them to spread out their students and they are adding two grades. For the most part, it is going to be for the same families that they serve. Our families tend to have all of their children come through the Academy. So, the impact itself on surrounding areas should be very minimal. Dr. Jones questioned if the Planning Office heard from any of the neighboring communities or residents surrounding this area? Responding to Dr. Jones, Mrs. Bulkilvish stated no, they have not received any comments from the neighboring properties. Mrs. Maucher opened the public hearing and after seeing no one wishing to speak, closed the public hearing. Mr. Hartman moved to approve Application S-21-02 Academy of Dover Charter School at 104 Saulsbury Road to permit the construction of a 7,072 SF building behind the existing building and to include the Waiver to Eliminate the Opaque Barrier Fence requirement for the south and west property boundaries recognizing the presence and maintenance of the existing trees and 9 12

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 vegetation along those property lines, seconded by Mrs. Welsh and the motion was carried 8-0 by roll call vote with Mr. Baldwin recused. Mr. Hartman voting yes; based on the recommendations of the Planning Office and their DAC comments. Mrs. Lord voting yes; based on reasons previously stated. Mrs. Welsh voting yes; for reasons stated in the motion. Dr. Jones voting yes; for reasons previously stated. Mr. Adams voting yes; he wishes the school good luck in this project. Mr. Roach voting yes; this additional space will be a welcomed addition and he hopes that everything goes well. Mrs. Malone voting yes; she thinks that it is a good project and also for reasons previously stated. Mrs. Maucher voting yes; based on Staff comments and DAC comments. S-21-03 Three Lots at Secure Storage on Lafferty Lane: Master Plan - Public Hearing and Review of a Site Development Master Plan Application to permit development of three (3) existing parcels. The parcels are listed as Lots 2, 3, and 4 respectively; with Lot 1 being the main parcel for the Secure Storage Facility. Lot 2 is proposed to contain a Building of 23,600 +/- SF with associated site improvements. Lot 3 is proposed to contain a Building of 23,600 +/-SF with associated site improvements. Lot 4 is proposed to contain a Building of 21,400 +/-SF with associated site improvements. The proposed development area of the three Lots totals 7.67 acres +/- and is zoned IPM (Industrial Park and Manufacturing Zone). The land tracts are located on the north side of Lafferty Lane and east of Bay Road. The owner of record is Secure Storage LLC. Property Addresses: unaddressed but are adjacent to 640 Lafferty Lane. Tax Parcels: ED- 05-077.00-01-25.01-000, ED-05-077.00-01-25.02-000, and ED-05-077.00-01-25.03-000. Council District 2. Waiver Requests: Elimination of Sidewalks, Partial Elimination of Upright Curbing and Consideration of Performance Standards Review Application. The three Lots were created as part of a Minor Subdivision Plan with Site Plan S-02-23 Secure Storage LLC for Mini-Storage Facility (Lot 1) in 2002. Representative: Mr. Jonathan Street, Becker Morgan Group Mr. Swierczek stated that this is a Site Development Master Plan for three lots on Lafferty Lane. They are noted as Lots 2, 3 and 4 with Lot 1 being the primary and already developed lot for the Secure Storage itself. This is being proposed as a Site Development Master Plan as once again, the applicant has not identified any specific tenants. They have notified Planning Staff that they have been in some discussions with some businesses. They are looking to have some perspective developments approved so that they might be able to move forward in order to accommodate that. This would be allowed as a Site Development Master Plan and then the specific lots might be able to move forward under an Administrative Review. There isn’t specific phasing identified in that regard. It is mainly to address the ability to move forward with that additional Administrative Review. The buildings as shown on Lots 2 and 3 are each currently shown as 23,600 SF and with the building on Lot 4 identified as 21,400 SF. All three buildings are sharing a single access point off of Lafferty Lane that connects into Lot 3. This is the sole component of those that they could obviously identify that has to be developed first as that access point would allow for construction to be done on all three lots. The applicant has similarly noted a 60-foot cross-access easement being implemented across the entire frontage of Lot 3 that would allow that access road to connect to Lots 2 and 4 as well. There is no interconnectivity shown between any of these lots and the primary Lot 1. The most recent application for this overall site was from 2017 that proposed putting in the final Phases 2 and 3 of construction to Secure Storage. They did submit a Waiver Request for that application to eliminate the requirements for sidewalks 10 13

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 along the Lafferty Lane frontage. They have similarly submitted a Request to also eliminate sidewalks across the Lafferty Lane frontage on these three properties. They have further submitted an administrative Waiver Request for the Partial Elimination of Upright Curbing. This pertains to certain areas around the parking lots and the added drive on Lot 4. Each of the buildings is shown to be approximately one story. Again, these do not have any building architecture (submitted). If there were any more specifics to be identified, that will come across for review by Planning Staff. There is a fenced in yard identified at the rear of all three of these buildings and there is a loading space identified at the rear of each of these buildings as well. The appropriateness of the loading facilities and the parking as well will be further addressed upon further review by Planning Staff through an administrative process as well as the permit review process. Another key thing that Staff notes is on Lot 1, immediately adjacent to Lot 4, there is an unmarked cemetery. This is something that came across when DelDOT was surveying for the construction of Lafferty Lane. In the development of Lot 1, it was identified that the applicant should obviously be cognizant of that cemetery and similarly to do so here with the development of Lot 4. The main thing is that they have again submitted a Performance Standards Review Application as this is an IPM Zone site. They have submitted that for review by the Planning Commission. Planning Staff has approved the administrative Waiver for the Partial Elimination of Upright Curbing. As it pertains to the Performance Standards Review, Planning Staff would again recommend approval of the Performance Standards Review noting that we will be further reviewing each one of these sites through an additional administrative process as well as a permit review process and any potential objectionable or hazardous materials to be used by any tenant would raise a red flag for the Planning Staff along with the elimination of curbing, Planning Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission waive the requirements for the sidewalks along the frontage of Lafferty Lane as they did in the 2017 application for Lot 1. If sidewalks were to be provided right now, they wouldn’t connect to anything. There is no other sidewalk along the Lafferty Lane frontage. However, the Waiver Request also noted that they were requesting to not have to provide a sidewalk linking the three buildings providing internal pedestrian access. Planning Staff was not recommending approval for that but they of course welcome the commentary by the applicant. As the applicant noted, there has not been a tenant identified yet for any one of these three sites. Supposing that there might be some type of connectivity between these potential businesses, it would be more beneficial to provide a pedestrian only access sidewalk as opposed to having people using drive aisles or the parking lots to access one property from another. Mr. Street stated this application is for a Site Master Plan and what that does is gives the applicant the ability to build each building or each lot separately and also allows them for a little bit more flexibility. Each one of these lots, as they would be developed, would still have to come before Planning Staff and would still have to meet the criteria of the Master Plan as you see it. They are in receipt of Staff comments and they don’t have any comments to them, with the exception of a couple things. For the Planting requirements in the DAC he and Mrs. Melson- Williams discussed them with the applicant. They had requested that the planting requirement be something less than the 7.76 acres of site area. You can see on the plan that there is a large area at the back of the site made up of stormwater management and a water swale. There are also areas of easement. There is a water line that runs between Lots 2 and 3. So, there is some area that is undevelopable that they can’t necessarily touch and they are asking that it be removed from the requirements. He thinks that it is mentioned in the comments that the tenants of each 11 14

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 specific area could be worked out administratively. They have a landscape plan that puts up 95 trees so he thinks that they are good with the area as long as they and Staff can work that out; he doesn’t think that there will be any problems. With regard to the Performance Standards, he wanted to make sure that Mr. Hartman was satisfied. Although, he thinks this application is very similar to another application that was heard tonight where they don’t know the tenants right now. They know that it is going to be more of warehousing and construction type uses and those standards would be reviewed by Staff as each administrative application comes through for them. With regard to lighting, lighting will be done on the parking lots and any impervious surface as per the City Code requires. You can see from the Site Plan in front of you that the site is going to have one main access from Lafferty Lane and then separate into the three individual lots; and that cross-access easement was previously recorded for this plan. With that, the partial elimination of the curb, they will often request a partial elimination of curbing for these sites to make way for stormwater management. Stormwater management on the site has previously been approved and managed but they will still have to submit to the Kent Conservation District to confirm impervious areas are covered with drainage; and they will issue that approval of that plan. They request the partial elimination so that water can sheet-flow off of the parking areas and the rear will have some amount of gravel used for turning areas for trucks and loading. It is a little bit easier to control stormwater when it is just able to sheet-flow off the ground. Often when we install curbs, we have to install closed drainage systems. This is a more natural and a little bit easier to control when you are just running it off of the property. With regard to the sidewalk and the Sidewalk Waiver that they requested, we thank the Planning Staff for requesting the elimination of sidewalk off of Lafferty Lane since this project has requested that on multiple phases that it has gone through during years of development. With regard to the elimination of (internal) sidewalk, they won’t put up too much of a fight for the interconnection between the lots and they can provide that sidewalk without question. Dr. Jones questioned if the Site Development Plan approval requires measures that will protect this (cemetery) area? Responding to Dr. Jones, Mr. Swierczek stated yes, the unmarked cemetery actually does lie on Lot 1 and there were measures taken then to assure that the applicant did not disturb it. There were recommendations of putting up some type of temporary fence to ensure that no construction equipment would crossover that area even though construction wasn’t really being conducted in that area immediately. He thinks something similar would happen in this situation. Dr. Jones further questioned if that is the case, who is accountable for calling the stoppage if there are human remains discovered? Responding to Dr. Jones, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that the Unmarked Human Remains Law that is part of Delaware Code requires that anybody coming across from what could be perceived as human remains during construction activity is charged with stopping. Then there is a process that involves the State Historic Preservation Office for evaluation of whether that is in fact unmarked human remains. There is a fairly succinct process for dealing with that. The limits of the cemetery were fairly well studied during the requirements that DelDOT had to do with the Lafferty Lane relocation a number of years ago associated with the construction of State Route 1. The activities that would involve construction on these three lots are not within that cemetery boundary but there is always the possibility for outliers of course. So, that is why we make mention of it but certainly there is some stormwater management that is between the project sites and the location of the cemetery. It is a bit of a 12 15

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 distance so there is a comfort level there, but there is certainly activity in place and their plan itself actually defines the basic area of the cemetery anyway. She thinks that there are reasonable preventive measures there as we know where the bulk of it is. But that’s not to say that there might be something beyond that but there had been a lot of study done previously on the cemetery. The property owner is one in the same, so they are well aware of the presence in close proximity. Mr. Street stated that that area of the cemetery is located off of our property. Those updated Kent Conservation District plans as well as any Administrative Site Plan that would come through Staff’s Office, would define a limit of disturbance. That limit of disturbance the State uses on a State level is for construction activity and that limited disturbance would not cross that property line without written authorization from the neighboring parcel. He understands that the neighboring parcel has the same owner, but there is no need for them to be over there. Frankly, they pay a fee based on the area of limited disturbance so we try and keep that limit as small as we possibly can. Mrs. Maucher opened a public hearing and after seeing no one wishing to speak, closed the public hearing. Mrs. Welsh moved to approve application S-21-03 Three Lots at Secure Storage on Lafferty Lane: Master Plan, inclusive of all of the DAC comments and the waiver requests for the elimination of sidewalk, the elimination of upright curbing and the consideration of the Performance Standards Review Application, seconded by Mrs. Malone and the motion was carried 9-0 by roll call vote. Mrs. Welsh voting yes; for reasons previously stated and she thinks that it is a good expansion of the property. Dr. Jones voting yes; for reasons stated in the motion and it will be a good addition to that area. Mr. Adams voting yes. Mr. Roach voting yes. Mrs. Malone voting yes; she thinks that it is a good project for the area. Mr. Hartman voting yes; the proposal is in accordance with Code and he would suggest to the applicant that they might want to install the internal sidewalk linkage as suggested by the Planning Office. Mr. Baldwin voting yes; based on reasons previously stated. Mrs. Lord voting yes; based on reasons previously stated and would also like to see the internal sidewalk installed. Mrs. Maucher voting yes; based on the DAC comments. SB-21-01 Lands of Bayroadcap, LLC at 600 Bay Road: Minor Subdivision Plan - Public Hearing and Review of a Minor Subdivision Plan to subdivide the Bay Road Commercial property consisting of 12.94 acres +/- into two parcels (Lot 1 and Lot 2). Lot 1 is to be 4.95 acres+/- and encompass the western portion of the property developed with Phase 1: Building, stormwater management facility, and parking area. Lot 1 does not have frontage on Bay Road. Lot 2 is to be 7.99 acres+/- and encompass the eastern residual portion of the property with frontage on Bay Road. The subject property is located on the west side of Bay Road near its intersection with Blue Hen Boulevard and the Bay Court Plaza entrance drive. The property is zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone). The owner of record is Bayroadcap, LLC. Property Address: 600 Bay Road. Tax Parcel Number: ED-05-077.00-01-09.00-000. Council District 2. Subdivision Waiver Requested: Elimination of Requirement for Lot Frontage on a Public Street. Application S-19-20 Delaware State Police Building Update at Bay Road Commercial was approved by the Planning Commission in September 2019 and received Final Plan Approval on 13 16

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 March 6, 2020 regarding the development of the Lot 1 area superseding Application S-17-20. Application C-20-02 Landing Square: Revised Phase 2 Area was approved by the Planning Commission on August 17, 2020 for the commercial development of the Lot 2 area. Representative: Mr. Jonathan Street, Becker Morgan Group Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that this is a Minor Subdivision Plan. We have seen this subject site a number of times in recent years, but this is a proposal to subdivide what is a 12.49 acre parcel into two lots. Lot 1 being the smaller of the two and focused on the western extremes of the property and then Lot 2 being just less than 8 acres and being the eastern portion of the property with frontage specifically on Bay Road. The property is zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone) and both parcels would remain that zoning classification. For previous history, there have been a number of projects. The two most recent of note is what is proposed here in the Lot 1 area was developed under the Site Plan Application S-19-20 the Delaware State Police Administration Update to the Bay Road Commercial site. There is that existing building there now and their parking and some stormwater management which will serve Lot 1 as well as some areas of Lot 2 likely. The Lot 2 area is the subject of the Site Plan piece of C-20-02 The Landing Square, also known as the Revised Phase 2 area which is just the site development for an office building and then two restaurant pieces out along Bay Road should they move to that direction. If you will remember those applications, access to the site is with a right-in/right-out off of Bay Road along the property frontage but the main real access to the property occurs by traveling over what they call the Baycourt Plaza entrance drive. That is not public right-of-way; it just happens to be a named entrance drive which has easements that allow access to the subject parcel as well as to a property owned by DelDOT and DTC that is to the further west. The Baycourt Plaza entrance drive is not right-of-way. Because with the kind of Z-shaped property line that they are requesting to strike to divide this into two lots leaves Lot 1 without specific frontage on a public street. That is a requirement of our Land Subdivision Regulations; however, there is the ability for the Planning Commission and then ultimately City Council, to consider a waiver of the Subdivision Regulations to remove that requirement. They are seeking this waiver as Lot 1 does not have frontage on a public street. It has the ability to access a public street by the easement that exists along the Baycourt Plaza drive and then also if additional easements are established across Lot 2 for it to reach Bay Road. Lot 2 has the required frontage on Bay Road. Any time that we are striking a property line, we have to look at the bulk standards for the zone. With this being C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone), they have looked at that and the second sheet of their submission very specifically shows where the building is on Lot 1 so that we can confirm that setbacks from property lines as met. Likewise, that will also have to be confirmed with the development that was recently approved on Lot 2. In recent weeks, it went to Final Plan Approval so they will need to double check that the new proposed property line doesn’t impede any required setbacks there. For the balance of the development, that really is related to the approved development plans that exist so things like parking, sidewalks and tree plantings are covered under a Site Development Plan Review. As she said, Lot 1 is pretty much completed its development at this point, but Lot 2 will be subject to the plans that are recently approved for its development. There were comments from the other regulatory agencies that are included in the packet, but Staff finds that the creation of two lots generally complies with our Land Subdivision Regulations. Dividing it into two lots does not impede its future development; however, we do need to address the Subdivision Waiver for the requirement of the lot to have frontage on a 14 17

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 public street. Staff does recommend that that Waiver be granted and in doing so, that you require the cross access easements to be very specifically established to ensure both Lot 1 and Lot 2 can make use of that Baycourt Plaza entrance drive to reach Bay Road which is the public street in this general area and that there are also appropriate easements associated across Lot 2 and between these two Lots to cover things related to utilities, site circulation, and the like. With a Subdivision Waiver, the Planning Commission is making a recommendation and that recommendation must be forwarded to City Council. Mr. Street stated that what you are looking at tonight is simply the subdivision of two properties. What you are not seeing on the plan are the cross access easements. There are currently cross access easements between not only Bay Road and the neighboring property to the north where Century Engineering is now. You can actually see that cross access easement there defined on the plan, but it also includes the attorney’s office out front as well. Also, what you are not seeing on the plan that was deeded is that the project will provide sewer not only to both Lot 1 and Lot 2, but also that parcel out front as well. That will have to be restated and re-recorded to include new parcel numbers and owners if the Waiver is granted. The cross access easement that is currently on the Baycourt Plaza side which is the boulevard entry, that was actually made up of two different easements prior to the original approval to this a couple of years ago. They actually researched that and cleaned that up for our parcel in its entirety. DelDOT and DART are both a party to that and that obviously would remain as it has been a long standing easement that provides not only our parcel access but the DART facility access as well. As part of the State Police project, they also included that interconnection there to make the bus traffic in and out a little easier and well organized. With that, they are in receipt of Staff’s comments; they don’t have any real concerns with comments. The cross access easement that Mrs. Melson-Williams was stating would have to be recorded and taken care of. The State Police facility is kind of its own little parcel there as Lot 1. The stormwater management that is on the north side of them, serves both what would be Lot 1 and a small portion of Lot 2; so, there will be some sharing of maintenance responsibilities. It is going to be the same owner, but this is still a typical agreement that happens. Most recently the last one that he did was across the street to the south with the DSWA and the Chesapeake Utilities site. The stormwater management pond is located on the Chesapeake Utilities parcel, but it feeds the entire business park and there is an agreement of who maintains what and what percentages of maintenance needs to be done. This is a typical agreement and it is something that they are already aware of and are already working on. They are not changing anything about current agreements that are in place with the exception of updating parcel numbers and owners. They are not proposing to sell off any of these parcels. This is just being done so that they can kind of reorganize the financing for construction because the State Police Building is completed. This whole parcel (Lot 1) will essentially be done and signed off on which allows them to then move on with development of Lot 2 and its financing. Mrs. Maucher opened a public hearing. Ms. Karen Vicks – 580 Bay Road Dover, DE 19901 Ms. Vicks stated that she did not have any comments; she is here for informational purposes. Mrs. Maucher closed the public hearing. 15 18

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, 2021 Mr. Hartman moved to recommend approval to City Council for SB-21-01 Lands of Bayroadcap, LLC at 600 Bay Road: Minor Subdivision Plan to include the Waiver to eliminate the lot frontage requirement for Lot 1 provided that cross access easements among both Lots 1 & 2 and along the Baycourt Plaza entrance drive to ensure permanent access to Bay Road is secured and that these easements allow for the owners of each lot to make any improvements necessary to the internal circulation system as specified in the Zoning Ordinance Article 8, Section 1 to ensure that internal circulation and site access to both lots are beneficial to the public health, safety and general welfare, seconded by Mr. Adams and the motion was carried 9-0 by roll call vote. Mr. Hartman voting yes; he agrees with the Planning Office’s commentary and the DAC requirements in Section VII of the DAC Report. Mr. Baldwin voting yes; based on Staff’s recommendations. Mrs. Lord voting yes; based on reasons previously stated. Mrs. Welsh voting yes; based on DAC comments and that it is in compliance with plan for that site area. Dr. Jones voting yes; for reasons previously stated. Mr. Adams voting yes. Mr. Roach voting yes. Mrs. Malone voting yes; for reasons previously stated. Mrs. Maucher voting yes; based on Staff and DAC comments. NEW BUSINESS - None Meeting adjourned at 9:15 PM. Sincerely, Kristen Mullaney Secretary 16 19

Item 2. City of Dover, DE 2019 Comprehensive Plan File: M:\PS_DATA\2018_Comp_Plan_Draft_Maps\Comp_Plan_2018_FINAL_MXDS\Map 12-1 Land Development Plan_Revised.mxd Map 12-1: Land Development Plan As Revised on March 8, 2021 0 2,500 Hydrology Roads LEGEND 5,000 Feet ¯ Dover Boundary Land Use Active Agriculture Commercial - Entertainment Commercial - High Intensity Commercial - Low Intensity DoverAFB Industrial Institutional Mixed Use Office Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Public and Private Utilities Residential High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Train Track Water Bodies 0 5,000 Feet Inset Map PAPER MAP DISCLAIMER: By acceptance of this map material you agree to the following: This map material is made available by the City of Dover, Delaware as a public service. The material is for reference purposes only, and the City makes no warranty, re presentation, or guaranty as to the accuracy of the material, including its accuracy, availability, use, and misuse. In no event shall the City be liable for any direct or indirect damages suffered by the Recipient or others arising from any inadequacies of the digital data or the Recipient's use of this data. The material is in the public domain and may be copied without permission. Citation to the source would be appreciated. Any errors or omissions in the material should be reported to the City of Dover, Delaware's Public Works GIS 20 Division.

Item 2. City of Dover, DE 2019 Comprehensive Plan File: M:\PS_DATA\2018_Comp_Plan_Draft_Maps\Comp_Plan_2018_FINAL_MXDS\Map 12-1A Land Development Plan_Revised.mxd Map 12-1A: Land Development Plan As Revised on March 8, 2021 0 1,500 LEGEND Dover Boundary Roads 3,000 Feet ¯ Hydrology Land Use Active Agriculture Commercial Entertainment Commercial High Intensity Commercial Low Intensity DoverAFB Industrial Institutional Mixed Use Office Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Public and Private Utilities Residential High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Train Track Water Bodies 0 10,000 Feet Inset Map PAPER MAP DISCLAIMER: By acceptance of this map material you agree to the following: This map material is made available by the City of Dover, Delaware as a public service. The material is for reference purposes only, and the City makes no warranty, re presentation, or guaranty as to the accuracy of the material, including its accuracy, availability, use, and misuse. In no event shall the City be liable for any direct or indirect damages suffered by the Recipient or others arising from any inadequacies of the digital data or the Recipient's use of this data. The material is in the public domain and may be copied without permission. Citation to the source would be appreciated. Any errors or omissions in the material should be reported to the City of Dover, Delaware's Public Works GIS 21 Division.

Item 2. City of Dover, DE 2019 Comprehensive Plan File:M:\PS_DATA\2018_Comp_Plan_Draft_Maps\Comp_Plan_2018_FINAL_MXDS\Map 12-1C Land Development Plan_Revised.mxd Map 12-1C: Land Development Plan As Revised on March 8, 2021 0 1,500 LEGEND Dover Boundary Roads 3,000 Feet ¯ Hydrology Land Use Active Agriculture Commercial Entertainment Commercial High Intensity Commercial Low Intensity DoverAFB Industrial Institutional Mixed Use Office Open Space, Conservation, Recreation Public and Private Utilities Residential High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Train Track Water Bodies 0 10,000 Feet Inset Map PAPER MAP DISCLAIMER: By acceptance of this map material you agree to the following: This map material is made available by the City of Dover, Delaware as a public service. The material is for reference purposes only, and the City makes no warranty, re presentation, or guaranty as to the accuracy of the material, including its accuracy, availability, use, and misuse. In no event shall the City be liable for any direct or indirect damages suffered by the Recipient or others arising from any inadequacies of the digital data or the Recipient's use of this data. The material is in the public domain and may be copied without permission. Citation to the source would be appreciated. Any errors or omissions in the material should be reported to the City of Dover, Delaware's Public Works GIS 22 Division.

Item 3. The Institute for Public Administration presents Real Estate Trends and the Pandemic: How Will Land Use Change in Delaware? COURSE INSTRUCTOR Sean O’Neill, AICP Policy Scientist, IPA University of Delaware April 23, 2021 Changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted our day-to-day lives and the built environment around us. Remote work became normal, 10:00 a.m. to Noon online delivery services boomed, and many brick and mortar stores suffered. Some trends that were already occurring were accelerated by the pandemic, and VIA ZOOM MEETING others were maybe a bit less anticipated. As our state hopefully begins to come out of the pandemic in the Registration in advance is required. summer of 2021, what will these changes mean for the After registering, you will receive a confirmation email with information built environment in your community? about joining the meeting. Topics covered in this course will include: $20 Registration Fee • Trends impacting the office, retail, residential, and industrial warehouse sectors Register Online • Feedback gathered from Delaware real estate professionals www.bidenschool.udel.edu/ • How your community can be proactive and adapt ipa/events/upcoming to these changes This session qualifies for certificate credit in the Academy for Excellence in Local Government Leadership. Contact Sean O’Neill (oneill@udel.edu) with questions about this event. 23

Duffield Associates, LLC 144 South GovernorsItem 4. Ave. Dover, DE 19904 Phone: 302.239-6634 Fax: 302.239-8485 duffnet.com April 9, 2021 Mr. Julian Swierczek Planner I City of Dover Department of Planning & Inspection 15 Loockerman Plaza Dover, DE 19901 RE: Application No. S-19-07 Site Development Plan Application – Retail Facility at 515 South DuPont Highway Tax Parcel No. ED-05-077.00-01-12.00-000 City of Dover, Delaware Project No. 12000.CA (Duffield) Dear Mr. Swierczek: Duffield Associates, LLC (Duffield) is writing this letter, on behalf of Kent Del Properties, LLC, to request an extension of the Planning Commission decision for conditional approval of the Site Development Plan for the Retail Facility at 515 South Dupont Highway. The decision made at the April 15, 2019 Planning Commission meeting allowed for the construction of a one-story 8,050 square foot retail building and accompanying site improvements. Per the Notice of Decision, the Site Development Plan S-19-07 has until April 30, 2021 to start authorized construction. Over the two years, the property owner has been working on Site Development Plans for the development. This includes obtaining approvals from Delaware Department of Transportation for the proposed entrance for the shopping center, as well as approvals from Kent Conservation District for the Sediment and Stormwater Management Plans for the project. Plans have been approved by all agencies required. Final Site Plan approval was issued by the City of Dover Planning Office on November 12, 2020. In accordance with City of Dover Code of Ordinances, we hereby request a one year extension for Site Development Plan to start authorized construction. Please do not hesitate to contact us, if you have any questions or comments with regard to the above request. We appreciate your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, DUFFIELD ASSOCIATES, LLC K. James Taylor, Jr., P.E. Project Manager KJT:cpt 12000CA.0421-Dover.COR Enhancing our community one project at a time. 24

Item 5. MEMORANDUM Department of Planning & Inspections P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Phone: (302) 736-7010 Fax (302) 736-4217 DATE: April 8, 2021 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Tracey Harvey, Planner Planning Office SUBJECT: Revisions to Conditional Use Site Plan C-21-02 JJ’s Learning Experience II Child Day Care Center at 756 South Little Creek Road, Dover, DE At its meeting of March 15, 2021, the City of Dover Planning Commission moved to defer action on Conditional Use Site Plan C-21-02 for thirty (30) days until the next Planning Commission meeting. This postponement was to allow the applicant to review and formalize to revisions to the Plan related to safety concerns for the children that will be attending the Child Daycare Center. As part of the motion, the Planning Commission noted issues involving the lighting, traffic flow, and children’s access to the playground. The applicant has submitted revisions to the Conditional Use Site Plan that addresses the concerns of the Planning Commission. A Letter of Transmittal dated March 25, 2021 and Revised Plan Sheets C1 and C2 dated March 25, 2021 were received. The key changes/revisions to the proposed plan consist of the following: 1. Two new pole mounted LED down lights are shown on the Plan to illuminate the east parking lot. 2. The location of the Dumpster has been repositioned on the Plan to ensure the safety of the children. The Dumpster with masonry enclosure is now located on the east side of the east entrance drive and north of a 10-space parking lot area. 3. A pedestrian crosswalk and pedestrian caution sign are shown on the Plan to ensure safe access to the building entrance. The marked crosswalk leads from the sidewalk along South Little Creek Road to the east side of the building where the building entrances are located. A marked crosswalk also connects to the handicapped parking space. 4. A handicap parking space has also been added to the parking lot on the east side of the building. 5. A bicycle rack has been added near the entry stairs on the east side of the building. 6. Access to the outdoor play area shows access directly from the building to the fenced in play area; see Sheet C2. There are two doors on the south elevation of the building with stairs to sidewalk segments to the gate entries to the fenced playground area. The Development Advisory Committee (D.A.C.) Report and Comments of March 3, 2021 is also provided as a document of record for this application. The Public Hearing was completed at the March 15, 2021 Meeting of the Planning Commission; see Meeting Minutes. 25

Item 5. City of Dover DATA SHEET FOR CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OF March 3, 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF March 15, 2021 Plan Title: JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center C-21-02 Plan Type: Conditional Use Plan Property Address: 756 South Little Creek Road Property Location: South side of Little Creek Road opposite Babb Drive Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.00-01-03.00-000 Owner: Empire Medical Group, LLC Lessee: Shawanda Johnson Site Area: 2.39 acres +/- Proposed Use: Child Day Care Center Building Size: 10,111 SF tenant space for Day Care Center 33,143 SF total building Off Street Parking: Required – 36 parking spaces 1 space per 10 children + 1 per adult attendant Proposed – 60 parking spaces already existing on-site and 13 proposed parking spaces Sewer & Water: City of Dover Zoning Classification: C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone) 26

C-21-02 JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center Item 5. Final DAC Report –March 3, 2021 Page 2 C P I L CITYY OF DOVER T A Y N DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE N O I APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY F N G D.A.C. MEETING DATE: March 3, 2021 D O V E R APPLICATION: JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center FILE #: C-21-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Planning CONTACT PERSON: Tracey Harvey, Planner PHONE #: (302) 736-7196 I. PLAN SUMMARY: The Conditional Use Site Plan Review is to permit the renovation of an existing 10,111 SF space in an existing one-story 33,143 SF building into a Child Day Care Center to serve 170 children. The property consists of 2.39 +/- acres and is zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone). The building is located on the south side of South Little Creek Road opposite Babb Drive. The owner of record is Empire Medical Group, LLC. and the applicant (lessee) is Shawanda Johnson. Property Address: 756 South Little Creek Road. Tax Parcels: ED-05-077.00-01-03.00-000. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project proposes using a space in an existing one-story 33,143 SF building. The proposed location for the Child Daycare Center consists of a 10,111 SF building space that will serve 170 children and 19 adult staff. The plan identifies an outdoor play area that will be fenced in on the south side of the building. There are two areas of existing pavement to be utilized as parking lots for a total of 73 spaces on-site. A plan of the site conditions, building architecture sheet, and a narrative of the proposal were submitted. A City of Dover Business License and a Public Occupancy Permit are required for the Child Day Care Center. Child Day Care facilities must meet State licensing standards and must be inspected by the City of Dover Fire Marshal’s Office. III. ZONING REVIEW: The property is zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone). With the proposal, the existing building footprint is not changing or enlarging. According to Zoning Ordinance Article 5 Section 14.12 a Child Day Care Facility is permitted in all zones provided a need can be demonstrated. The Child Day Care facilities type of land use requires Conditional Use approval by the Planning Commission based on the requirements for a Day Care Center when located in a place other than an unoccupied residence and providing services to more than 13 children. This 27

C-21-02 JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center Item 5. Final DAC Report –March 3, 2021 Page 3 is noted in Article 5 §14 and Article 10 §1. The requirements for Child Day Care facilities are given below: Article 5 Section 14. Child Day care facilities. 14.1 General. In order to promote the development of quality child care outside of the home (day care facilities), the following two basic assumptions have been made: 14.11 The establishment of child day care services and facilities, wherever there is a need, is a necessary public objective; and 14.12 Day care programs for children shall be treated as community facilities and shall be permitted to locate in any zoning district, provided that need has been demonstrated, state licensing requirements have been met and no physical hazard to children can be reasonably anticipated. 14.2 Definitions. Child day care facility. For the purposes of this ordinance, the facilities described furnishing care, supervision and guidance of a child or group of children unaccompanied by a parent or guardian, for periods of less than 24 hours per day shall be defined as follows: 14.21 Child day care center. (a) Any place, other than an occupied residence, which receives children for compensation for day care or large family day care home; and (b) Any occupied residence which receives 13 or more children for compensation for day care. Child day care centers shall be required to obtain conditional use approval by the planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general conditions set forth in article 10 and to any specified requirement set forth in subsection 14.3 below, except in zoning districts where listed as a permitted use. 14.22 Family day care home-children. An occupied residence in which a person provides care for children other than his/her own family and the children of close relatives for compensation. Such care in a family day care home is limited to that care given to six or fewer children with a maximum of three children allowed for after school care. Such child care facility shall be permitted as an accessory use in all residential zones and shall be exempt from obtaining a conditional use permit and site plan approval. 14.23 Large family day care home-children. A facility which provides child care for more than six, but less than 13 children with a maximum of three children allowed for after school care. This care may be offered in a private home or in a property converted to the purpose of providing child day care. This form of day care facility requires the submission of a site plan application in accordance with the procedures and subject to article 10, section 2 of the zoning ordinance. If a large family day care home is not to be located in an occupied residence, then a conditional use site plan application shall be required in accordance with article 10 section 1 of the zoning ordinance. 14.3 Zoning criteria. 14.31 Number of children. Day care centers shall be limited to a maximum of 50 children in all residential zones. 14.32 Outdoor play area. Must meet the state requirement for day care centers. 14.33 Off-street parking/loading. One space per each adult attendant, plus one space for 28

C-21-02 JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center Item 5. Final DAC Report –March 3, 2021 Page 4 every ten children. 14.34 Signage for child day care facilities (a) Signs in residential zones. i. Family day care homes-children and large family day care homes- children. One wall-mounted sign limited to two square feet. ii. Child day care center. One sign, wall-mounted or freestanding, limited in area to 12 square feet. The planning commission shall consider the location of such sign as part of the conditional use review and may approve a lesser amount of sign area if deemed necessary by the commission to protect the general health, safety and welfare of the public in general and the residents of the immediate neighborhood in particular. (b) Signs in nonresidential zones. Child day care centers within nonresidential zoning districts shall be governed by the sign regulations in effect for the particular nonresidential zoning district in which the day care center is located. 14.35 Licensing requirements. Child day care facilities must meet state licensing standards and must be inspected by the City of Dover Fire Marshal’s Office. A City of Dover Business License and a Public Occupancy Permit is required. (Ord. of 5-14-1990; Ord. of 4-25-1994; Ord. of 4-23-2007(3)) Ord. No. 2017-13, 12-11-2017) Conditional Use Review This Conditional Use is subject to the requirements of Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 §1 further discussed below. With Conditional Use applications, the Planning Commission reviews the proposed project to determine whether or not the intended use is appropriate in type and scale for the immediate neighborhood. The Commission must also consider whether or not the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the future orderly development of the surrounding area. The Planning Commission may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards to the use if determined to be necessary. The following sections of the Zoning Ordinance which relate to the role of the Commission in reviewing Conditional Use applications are particularly relevant when reviewing this application: Article 10 §1: 1.1 Accessibility for emergency response. That all proposed structures, equipment or material shall be readily accessible for fire, ambulance, police, and other emergency response; 1.2 Harmony of location, size and character. That the proposed use shall be of such location, size and character that, in general, it will be in harmony with the appropriate and orderly development of the zone in which it is proposed to be situated and will not be detrimental to the orderly development of adjacent properties in accordance with the zoning classification of such properties; 1.3 Residential zones. That, in addition to the above, in the case of any use located in, or adjacent to, a residential zone: 1.31 The location and size of such use, the nature and intensity of operations involved in or conducted in connection therewith, its site layout and its relation to access streets shall be such that both pedestrian and vehicular traffic to and from the use and the assembly of persons in connection therewith will not be hazardous or inconvenient to, or incongruous with, the said residential district or conflict with the normal traffic of the neighborhood; and 29

C-21-02 JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center Item 5. Final DAC Report –March 3, 2021 Page 5 1.32 The location and height of buildings, the location, nature and height of walls and fences, the nature and extent of landscaping, and other improvements on the site shall be such that the use will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings. 1.4 Conditional use permits. 1.41 Conditional use approval. Any use for which a conditional use permit may be granted shall be deemed to be a conforming use in the district in which such use is located, provided that: (A) The provision in this article under which such permit was issued is still in effect; (B) Such permit was issued in conformity with the provisions of this article; and (C) Such permit shall be deemed to affect only the lot or portion thereof for which such permit shall have been granted. 1.42 Periodic renewal of conditional use permit. The commission may require that conditional use permits be periodically renewed. Such renewal shall be granted following public notice and hearing in accordance with subsection 1.53. The commission may withhold approval of the renewal upon a determination by the city planner to the effect that such conditions as may have been prescribed by the commission in conjunction with the issuance of the original permit have not been, or are being no longer, complied with. If the Planning Commission approves a Conditional Use, the use is granted as a Conditional Use Permit. Such permits may be permanent, subject to limitations outlined in Zoning Ordinance Article 10 §1.41 or be required by the Commission to undergo periodic renewal, using the procedure described in Article 10 §1.42. Any Conditional Use Permit, permanent or not, may be revoked using the procedure described in Article 10 §1.43 if the conditions prescribed by the Commission in conjunction with the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit have not been, or are no longer being complied with. For a property seeking Conditional Use approval which does not need associated Site Development Plan approval (due to occupying an existing building), Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 §1.8 outlines the submission requirements. These requirements include a map of the property showing existing conditions with the appropriate legal data and information on the elements of the proposed use. IV. PARKING SUMMARY The number of required parking spaces for a Child Day Care facility is given in Article 5 §14.33, which requires one space per ten (10) children plus one space per adult attendant. Since this facility proposes 170 children and 19 adult attendants, the site would require 36 parking spaces for the Child Day Care Center use. This size building space in the C-4 zoning district would require a minimum of 34 parking spaces. The plan states 73 parking spaces are to be provided in total on the site including 3 handicapped parking spaces. The plan indicated that 13 proposed new parking spaces will be striped to achieve the total of 73 spaces. The new spaces are found in both sides of the building. Overall the 33,143 SF building would require 111 parking spaces; however, it is considered legal non- conforming as to the current parking requirements. 30

C-21-02 JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center Item 5. Final DAC Report –March 3, 2021 Page 6 Bicycle Parking The site is required to provide bicycle parking. The bicycle parking calculation is one (1) for every twenty (20) parking spaces. Based on the number of parking spaces at the property, a total of four (4) bicycle parking spaces are required. The location of the bike rack(s) needs to be located on the Site Plan. V. SITE CONSIDERATIONS Access There is direct access to the site: one to the large parking lot on the west side of the building and one to the proposed parking areas (previous loading areas) on the east side of the building. There are two entrances/exits off South Little Creek Road. These entrances must be evaluated by DelDOT for any necessary improvements. Dumpsters Dumpsters for trash and recycling collection are required for the property. The Plan identifies the two Dumpster locations for the building with a concrete pad and enclosure. Sidewalks There is an existing sidewalk and curbing along South Little Creek Road. There is currently no sidewalk from South Little Creek Road serving as a direct access to the site while it appears to be shown on the plan. Zoning Ordinance Article 5, Section 18 provides the guidelines for pedestrian, bicycle, and multi-modal access requirement, which states when sidewalks or other pathways shall be installed on a property by the property owner or developer. For the Day Care Center on the east side of the building, the entire parking lot is paved. Access is proposed to the building with the construction of a ramp and steps on the east side of the building. The Planning Commission may prescribe appropriate conditions for establishment of the use. VI. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE The submission does not require Architectural Elevation drawings since the existing building will be utilized. The site has an existing one-story stucco-like clad building with a flat roof. The architectural elevation does not appear to show the improvements for the Child Day Care Center. For the Child Day Care Center, there are two (2) separate building entrances that both face the east parking lot. There is an existing entrance for school aged children to enter the building and there is a proposed new entrance with the constructions of steps and a ramp for entry into the building. VII. TREE PLANTING AND LANDSCAPE PLAN Based on the development area of 10,111 +/- S.F. for the Day Care Center, four (4) trees would be required to planted on the site. The plan shows the presence of three (3) existing trees and one (1) tree proposed to be planted. It is noted that the overall site does not comply with the current tree planting provisions which would require a total of thirty-five (35) trees since it was developed prior to the Zoning Ordinances current provisions. 31

C-21-02 JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center Item 5. Final DAC Report –March 3, 2021 Page 7 VIII. CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: The subject proposal has been reviewed for code compliance, plan conformity, and completeness in accordance with this agency’s authority and area of expertise. The following items have been identified as elements which need to be addressed by the applicant: 1) Identify the main entrance to the Child Day Care Center tenant space of the building for evaluation of pedestrian circulation with the installation of a sidewalk or pavement markings. 2) The data columns will need to be updated prior to Final Approval with the following: a) Any updates to the data column resulting from changes to the site layout. b) Any changes recommended, or approvals granted by the Planning Commission. 3) Parking is required for four (4) bicycles. Specifically, the Day Care Center should provide at least two (2) of these spaces based on their parking requirement. Please identify where the bicycle parking will be provided and the format of the rack. 4) Provide information on the construction of the Dumpster enclosures. 5) The parking spaces as depicted on the plan must be implemented by striping, signage, parking bumpers, etc. IX. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES In accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 §1, the Planning Commission in considering and acting upon Conditional Use Plans may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards so that the public health, safety, and welfare, the comfort and convenience of the public in general, and the residents of the immediate neighborhood in particular shall be taken into consideration. These safeguards may to the maximum extent possible further the expressed intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the accomplishment of several objectives in particular listed in subsections 1.1 to 1.3. To meet these code objectives, Planning Staff recommends the Planning Commission prescribe the following conditions and safeguards: 1) Pedestrian Connectivity: To further subsection 1.31 related to pedestrian traffic not being hazardous or inconvenient to, or incongruous with the neighboring commercial district, Staff recommends that a delineated pedestrian pathway be marked from South Little Creek Road to the Day Care Center building entrance. Since the area is paved this may be achieve by pavement markings. a. Also add a paved sidewalk to the playground area and ensure accessibility. 2) Parking Facilities: Staff recommends improvements to parking related items. a. Since the Day Care Center is focused on the eastern portion of the building, it is recommended that a specific location for staff parking be identified. Full-time staff parking may need to be located in other areas of the site to allow for the 32

C-21-02 JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center Item 5. Final DAC Report –March 3, 2021 Page 8 parking for child drop-off/pick-up. The circulation pattern for drop-off and pick- up should also be identified. b. A handicapped parking space should be identified on the east side of the building as there is not a clear accessible path from the handicapped accessible spaces on the west side of the building. c. The applicant must identify the location of the bicycle rack on the Plan. It is recommended that at least two (2) of bicycle parking spaces be provided on the Day Care Center side of the building. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: 1) In the event, that major changes and revisions to the Conditional Use Plan occur in the finalization of the Site Plan contact the Department of Planning and Inspections. Examples include building additions, relocation of site components, and increases or changes in the number of children. These changes may require resubmittal for review by the Development Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, or other agencies and commissions making recommendations in regard to the plan. 2) Other agencies and departments which participate in the Development Advisory Committee may provide additional comments related to their areas of expertise and code requirements. 3) Following Planning Commission approval of the Conditional Use Plan, the Plan must be revised to meet all conditions of approval from the Development Advisory Committee or as otherwise noted. A Check Print must be submitted for review by Planning Office Staff and to each DAC participant providing comments. Upon determination that the Plan is complete and all agency approvals have been received, copies of the Plan may be submitted for final endorsement. 4) The applicant shall be aware that Conditional Use Plan approval does not represent a Sign Permit, nor does it convey permission to place any sign on the premises. Any proposed site or building identification sign shall require a Sign Permit from the City of Dover prior to placement of any such sign. 5) The applicant shall be aware that Conditional Use Plan approval does not represent a Building Permit, Business and Occupancy Licenses, and associated construction activity permits. A separate application process is required for issuance of a Building Permit from the City of Dover. At a minimum an Administrative Building Permit will be required to establish this Child Daycare Center facility use in the building. A Fence Permit is required to construct the playground area fence If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible. 33

Item 5. 34

Item 5. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2021 APPLICATION: JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center at 756 South Little Creek Road FILE #: C-21-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Department of Public Works CONTACT PERSON: Sharon J. Duca, P.E. CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GENERAL 1. None. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GENERAL 1. None. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GENERAL 1. The Department of Public Works has no objections to the plan as the site will be serviced by a private trash hauler and it is located off a State road. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED TO DISCUSS ANY OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS, PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE CONTACT PERSON AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. 35

CITY OF DOVER Item 5. DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2021 APPLICATION: JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center at 756 South Little Creek Road FILE #: C-21-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Department of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PERSON: Jason A. Lyon, P.E., Director of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 CONTACT PHONE #: jlyon@dover.de.us T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. Our office has no objection to the conditional use proposed for the subject property. 2. Due to the fact that this property is changing uses, water usage projections (peak demand or plumbing fixtures) must be submitted to our office to correctly determine the size of the domestic and irrigation (if applicable) water meter for the building. These projections must be submitted prior to approval so the meter size can be placed on the final site plan, if an upgrade is required. The proposed water meter must be installed in a pit per City of Dover requirements and manufacturer’s recommendations. Also, a dual check valve is required downstream of the meter. WASTEWATER 1. Our office has no objection to the conditional use proposed for the subject property. 2. Sizing (flow) calculations must be submitted for all sanitary sewer laterals (other than for single-family dwellings) showing that velocity and all other requirements are met. All proposed wastewater utility components must meet the requirements of the Public Utilities Water Wastewater Handbook, effective date March 22, 2010. Please contact our office for more information. GENERAL 1. None. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES WATER / WASTEWATER / GENERAL 1. None ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT WATER 1. Water impact fees may be associated with this project. 2. One meter shall be utilized for the entire building. WASTEWATER 1. Wastewater impact fees may be associated with this project. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE 36 P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .

Item 5. CITY OF DOVER ELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2021 APPLICATION: JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center at 756 S. Little Creek Rd FILE #: C-21-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric Department CONTACT PERSON: Paul Waddell, Electric Director CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7072 CONTACT EMAIL: pwaddell@dover.de.us T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC 1. Any relocation of existing electrical equipment will be engineered by the City of Dover Electric Department. Developer may be required to perform a quantity of the relocation. Any work performed by the City of Dover will be at the owner’s expense. 2. Owner is responsible for locating all existing underground facilities to include electric, water and gas. 3. Owner is responsible for site and/or street lighting. 4. Must maintain 10' clearance around all electrical equipment, unless pre-approved by the City of Dover Electric Engineering Department. 5. Prior to the completion of any/all designs and estimates, the owner is responsible for providing the Electric Engineering Department with a physical address of the property. 6. All Engineering and design for Dover Electric will be engineered upon receipt of final approved plans. All Engineering work will be furnished by the City’s Electric Engineering Department. GENERAL 1. Final site plan must be submitted in a digital format compatible with AutoCAD 2010 (.dwg format) and Adobe Reader (.pdf format), if applicable. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES 37

JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center at 756 S. Little Creek Rd Item 5. File #: C-21-02 February 24, 2021 Page 2 of 2 1. Owner must give the City of Dover Electric Department three (3) months’ notice prior to construction. Owner is responsible for following the requirements outlined in the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. The handbook is now available on the website at the following link: https://evogov.s3.amazonaws.com/media/27/media/13108.pdf. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT 1. Provide load sheets as soon as possible for proper sizing of transformers and creation of primary fee estimates. Current load sheets can be found at the following link: https://www.cityofdover.com/media/Electric%20Department/COD%20Electric%20Load%20Sheet.pdf. 2. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE . 38

C F C-21-02 Item 5. I I T R CITY OF DOVER Y E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE O M F A APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY R D.A.C. MEETING DATE: 02/24/21 D S O H V A E L APPLICATION: Learning Experience 2 Child Care at 756 S Little Creek Rd R FILE #: C-21-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Proposed occupancy classification is daycare center. NFPA 101, A.16.1.1 Suggested Staff to Client Ration in New and Existing Day-Care Occupancies Staff to Client Ratio Age (months) 1:3 0-24 1:4 25-36 1:7 37-60 1:10 61-96 1:12 97 plus 1:3 Clients incapable of self-preservation If staff to client ratios are below those suggested above, the AHJ shall determine the additional safeguards (this may include restricting the daycare to level of exit discharge only, requiring additional smoke detection, requiring automatic sprinkler protection, requiring better or additional means of egress, requiring similar types of provisions depending on the situation). NFPA 101, 3.3.190.4 Day Care Occupancy. An occupancy in which four or more clients receive care, maintenance, and supervision, by other than their relatives or legal guardians, for less than 24 hours per day. NFPA 101, 16.6.1.4.1.1 Family Day Care Home. A family day care home shall be s day care home in which more than three, but fewer than seven, clients receive care, maintenance, and supervision by other than their relatives or legal guardians for less than 24 hours per day, generally within a dwelling unit. NFPA 101, 16.6.1.4.1.2 Group Day Care Home. A group daycare home shall be a day care home in which not less than 7, but not more than 12, clients receive care, maintenance, or supervision bu other than their relatives or legal guardians for less than 24 hours per day, generally within a dwelling unit. NFPA 101, 3.3.66 Dwelling Unit definitions 39

Item 5. 2. Building Access shall be no further than 50 feet from a primary entrance Where buildings are provided with an automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with NFPA 13, access shall be no further than 100 feet from the primary entrance. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 5, 3) 3. Parking shall be prohibited in front of the primary entrance for a width of not less than 1.5 times the width of the door(s) or for 10 feet, whichever is greater. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 5, 6.3.2) 4. Perimeter access shall be 50% and clearly shown on the plans. Perimeter Access minimum width shall be 15 feet measured from the face of the building at grade with a maximum slope of ten percent (10%). Plantings and utility services (includes condenser units, transformers, etc.) shall be permitted within the perimeter access, and shall not interfere with emergency services fire ground operations. If a physical barrier (fence, pond, steep slope, etc) prevents access, that portion of the building perimeter shall not be included in the calculation of Percent of Perimeter Access. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 5, 3) 5. Fire lanes shall cover 25% of the proposed building. Fire lanes are required to be 24 feet wide and run along the front of the building as determined by the primary entrance(s). In cases where there is more than one primary entrance(s), each shall be served by a fire lane even if this exceeds the percentage as required. The closest edge of fire lanes shall not be located closer than ten (10) feet to the exterior wall and the closest edge of fire lanes shall not be located further than 50 feet from the exterior wall if one or two stories in height; 40 feet if three or four stories in height, or 30 feet if over four stories in height. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 5) 6. Where parking is located between the building and the fire lane, parking shall not be located closer than 15 feet to the exterior wall. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 5, 6.4.1) 7. All Fire Lanes shall be marked as follows: both the inner and outer edges of the fire lane shall be marked, where curbs are present, the top and face of the curb shall be painted yellow, where no curbs are present, a four inch (4”) solid yellow demarcation line shall mark the edge(s) of the fire lane. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 5, 7) 8. The specific color yellow shall be the uniformly accepted yellow as utilized by State of Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT). Only vivid and durable paint shall be used and shall be suitable for street surfaces 9. Fire lane signs shall be located as follows: see Figure 5-16 – Approved Sign For Marking Fire Lanes, fire lane signs shall be spaced at 150 foot intervals maximum, all fire lane signs shall be located no less than six feet (6’) and no higher than eight feet (8’) above the pavement, signs shall be placed at each end of the fire lane, and signs shall face all oncoming traffic. 40

Item 5. Where parking is not restricted roadway markings shall utilize the words "FIRE" and "LANE" in lieu of fire lane signs and shall conform to the specifications of 7.6. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 5, 7) 10. Where overhangs, canopies, balconies, or any other building or site features must project over any fire lane, an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13’-6” above the fire lane shall be provided and the portion of the building perimeter which contains overhangs, canopies, balconies, or any other building features shall not apply towards the fire lane accessibility requirements of Section 4.0, Table 5-1 in this chapter. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 5, 6.8) 11. Multiple Access Roads shall be provided when a fire department access road (fire lane) is determined by the Fire Marshal to be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, or other factors that could limit access such as placement of fire hose from fire equipment. 12. Street width shall be in accordance with City of Dover Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Article VII, Section A. 13, Residential areas 24 feet wide with no parking, 30 feet wide with parking on one side, or 36 feet wide with parking on both sides Commercial areas 26 feet wide with no parking, 32 feet wide with parking on one side, or 38 feet wide with parking on both sides Alley 12 feet wide Any dead-end road more than 300 feet in length shall be provided with a turnaround or cul-de- sac as outlined in the 2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 705, chapter 5, 2.3. 13. Speed Reduction Devices must be approved, please see City of Dover Ordinance Chapter 98-10 in reference to this process. 14. Gated Areas: Fire Department access shall be provided to the property through the use of a system or device approved by the Fire Marshal. The system or device required shall be located in an area accessible to the fire department and approved by the Fire Marshal. All gates shall be either automatic or manual. An automated system shall consist of one manual and one automated means to open the gate. The owner or their representative shall meet with the Fire Marshal prior to submission to agree on the system. A letter of agreement shall be created and signed by both parties. The letter shall include a detailed description of both the manual and automated means. A manual gate shall consist of one manual means to open the gate. The owner or their representative shall meet with the Fire Marshal prior to submission to agree on the means to open. A letter of agreement shall be created and signed by both parties. The letter shall include a detailed description of the manual means to open. 41

Item 5. To be considered accessible for fire department apparatus the actual clear openings shall be not less than 14 feet, the paved surface through the gate shall be not less than 12 feet, and the gate shall be setback from the perpendicular street by at least 50 feet. Please contact this office to discuss options available to comply with this requirement. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 705, Chapter 5, 2.6) 15. All fire hydrants shall be marked as prescribed within the appropriate section of this regulation and as illustrated by the appropriate figures of this regulation. All fire hydrants shall have minimum of four-inch (4") solid yellow demarcation lines to define specific areas, where fire hydrants are located along a curb line with permitted parking, the area between the fire hydrant and the street or fire lane shall be stenciled with four inch (4") demarcation lines and the words "NO PARKING", demarcation lines shall be measured from the center line of the fire hydrant and extend for a distance 15 feet on both sides. Where fire hydrants are located in parking lots or other areas susceptible to blockage by parked vehicles they shall be treated as follows: fire hydrants shall be protected in all directions for a distance of seven feet (7') with barriers or curbing, Minimum four-inch (4") diameter steel bollards filled with concrete and marked yellow shall be installed at the outermost corners of the fire hydrant demarcation area. The minimum height of the bollard shall be 36 inches above the finished grade of the adjacent surface, and the steamer connection of all fire hydrants shall be positioned so as to be facing the edge of the street, or traffic lane. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 6, 2) The owner is responsible if the hydrant is private. 16. Hydrant barrels shall be provided with reflective material, such as paint, durable for highway/roadway markings or a reflective tape of a minimum of 2” in width around the barrel under the top flange, hydrant bonnets shall be color coded based on the following criteria: class AA 1500 GPM - painted light blue, class A 1,000 GPM -1499 GPM - painted green, class B 500 - 999 GPM - painted orange, class C 250 - 499 GPM - painted red, class D under 250 GPM - painted black. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 703, Chapter 3. 4) The owner is responsible if the hydrant is private. 17. NFPA 72 compliant Fire Alarm System required per occupancy code requirements. Fire alarm in place of assembly. Fire alarm required. Any new occupancy or new portion of an occupancy determined to be a place of assembly by the fire marshal and is capable of receiving an occupant load of 75 persons or greater, shall be required to install a fire alarm in accordance with NFPA codes governing the installation of fire alarms and the National Electrical Code. Fire alarm system required. Any existing occupancy or portion of an existing occupancy determined to be a place of assembly by the fire marshal, and is undergoing renovations in excess of 50 percent of the assessed value of the building and is capable of receiving an occupant load 75 persons or greater or is being enlarged to receive an occupant load of 75 persons or greater, shall be required to install a complete fire alarm system in accordance with NFPA codes governing the installation of fire alarms and the National Electrical Code. Public mode audible requirements. To ensure that audible public mode signals are clearly heard by occupants of a structure, they shall have a sound level at least 15 decibels (dB) above the average ambient sound level or five decibels (dB) above the maximum sound level having a duration of at least 60 seconds, whichever is greater, measured five feet (1.5m) above the floor in the area 42

Item 5. required to be served by the system using the A-weighted scale dBA. In the event the stated requirement cannot be met a shunt trip relay/switches shall be the approved method of meeting the intent of this section of the Code. (City Code of Ordinances 46-171) 18. Sprinkler system required. System is to be monitored by an approved Fire Alarm System. This chapter shall apply to all buildings, structures, marine vessels, premises, and conditions which are modified by more than 50% after the effective date of these Regulations. The 50% figure shall be calculated utilizing the gross square footage of the building, structure, marine vessel, premises and conditions as to arrive at the correct application. Any proposal that is presented to the Office of the State Fire Marshal for review and approval for a building rehabilitation as defined in the 101 Life Safety Code, for less than 50% of the gross square footage of a non-sprinklered building, may not have another such project for the same building submitted for review and approval any sooner than three (3) years after the date of the final inspection unless sprinkler projection is provided throughout the entire building. In all buildings exceeding 10,000 square feet of aggregate, gross floor area. In all buildings in excess of 40 feet in height or more than four (4) stories in height. In all buildings or areas thereof used for the storage, fabricating, assembling, manufacturing, processing, display or sale of combustible goods, wares, merchandise, products, or materials when more than two (2) stories or 25 feet in height. In all basement areas exceeding 2,500 square feet floor area. In residential occupancies when of: Type V (0,0,0) or Type III (2,0,0) construction and exceeding two (2) stories or 25 feet in height. Type V (1,1,1) and Type III (2,1,1) or Type IV (2,H,H) construction exceeding three (3) stories or 3In all residential apartment buildings storage areas except individual unit closets that are located within individual residential living units. In all buildings used as health care occupancies as defined in the Life Safety Code, NFPA 101, as adopted and/or modified by these Regulations. In all buildings or areas classified as "high hazard" under the Life Safety Code, NFPA 101, or "extra hazard" under the Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, NFPA 13, as adopted and/or modified by these Regulations. All buildings used as dormitories, in whole or in part, to house students at a public or private school or public or private institution of higher education. (16 Del.C. Ch. 88) This applies to all such dormitories regardless if new or existing. (2015 State of Delaware fire Prevention Regulations, 702, Chapter 4) Places of assembly shall be sprinklered throughout in accordance with the most recently adopted edition of NFPA 13 when the following apply: All new indoor places of assembly with an occupant load of 150 persons or greater. Any interior renovations of 50 percent or more to an existing place of assembly with an occupant load greater than 150 persons. Any additions or increase in interior size to an existing place of assembly that would create an occupant load of 150 persons or greater. Places of assembly where alcohol is served for consumption on the premises shall be sprinklered throughout in accordance with the most recently adopted edition of NFPA 13 when the following apply: All new indoor places of assembly with an occupant load of 100 persons or greater and where alcohol will be served for consumption on the premises. 43

Item 5. Any interior renovation of 50 percent or more to an existing place of assembly with an occupant load greater than 100 persons and where alcohol will be served for consumption on the premises. Any additions or increase in interior size to an existing place of assembly which would create an occupant load of 100 persons or greater and where alcohol will be served for consumption on the premises. New educational occupancies of 5,000 square feet or greater shall be sprinklered throughout in accordance with the most recently adopted edition of NFPA 13. (City of Dover Code of Ordinances 46-162) 19. Fire Department Connection is to be a 5-inch stortz connection on a 30-degree elbow located within 50 feet of main entrance. Access to the Fire Department Connection must be clear unobstructed access as defined by the AHJ. Fire department connections. Unless otherwise approved by the fire marshal, fire department connections shall be on the street side of the building and shall be located and arranged so that hose lines can be readily and conveniently attached to without interference from any nearby obstructions as defined by the fire marshal's office. Fire department connections shall be a five- inch Storz. Fire department connections shall be within 300 feet of an approved City of Dover Fire Hydrant and within 50 feet of the main entrance of the structure it serves. All fire department connections shall be not less than three feet nor more than five feet in height above finished grade. The fire marshal shall have the authority to require more stringent requirements when deemed necessary. (City of Dover Code of Ordinances 46-162) 20. Parking and/or obstructions shall be prohibited in front of fire department connections for a distance measuring from the center line and extending four feet on both sides. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 5, 6.3.4) 21. Fire Department Connection to be located within 300 feet of fire hydrant, measured as hose would come off the fire equipment. 22. All standpipe and sprinkler connections shall be marked as prescribed within the appropriate section of this regulation and as illustrated by the appropriate figures of this regulation. All standpipe and sprinkler connections shall have minimum of four inch (4") solid yellow demarcation lines to define specific areas, Solid yellow demarcation lines shall be measured from the center line of the connection and extend for a distance of four feet (4') on both sides, and where parking is allow between the building and the street or fire lane the solid yellow demarcation lines shall extend from the end of the sidewalk surface to the street or fire lane (Markings shall not be required on the sidewalk surface). All fire department connections (standpipe and sprinkler) shall have a minimum 12" x 18" sign that reads FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION, sign lettering shall be a minimum of 3 inches (3") in height with red scotchlite letters on white scotchlite background. The sign shall be clearly visible from the fire lane or roadway, and signs using NFPA international symbols shall be an acceptable alternative. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 6, 3) 23. Standpipes shall be provided in all areas and buildings as required in the codes and standards listed in Regulation 701 as well as the following areas or buildings: In all Class A and Class B places of assembly and institutional occupancies two (2) stories or 25 feet in height or over, In any building over three (3) stories, In any building over 35 feet in height, 44

Item 5. In any building that has a floor above the first floor over 10,000 square feet gross floor area, In all buildings where the 1st floor exceeds 60,000 gross square feet, a Class I horizontal standpipe system installed in accordance with the applicable codes and standards listed in Regulation 701 of these Regulations shall be provided. All standpipe systems shall be installed in accordance with the applicable codes and standards listed in Regulation 701. The standpipe system shall be carried up with each floor and shall be installed and ready for use as each floor progresses. Standpipes shall not be more than one floor below the highest forms of staging, The 2½-inch of hose connections on Class I systems shall be provided in the following locations, At the highest intermediate landing between floor levels in every required exit stairway, Where intermediate landing is not provided, hose connections shall be permitted to be located at the main floor landings in exit stairways when approved by the authority having jurisdiction, Where the local fire department has the capability of providing the required pressure, hydraulically designed standpipe systems in fully sprinklered, non-high-rise buildings shall be designed to provide the required waterflow rate. A sign shall be provided at each landing, in all interior stairways, designating the floor level. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 702, Chapter 4, 2) 24. The installation of natural gas and LP gas meters, regulators, valves, and LP gas bottles shall be protected from impact damage by impact protection. Natural gas and LP gas meters, regulators, and valves located inside structures shall have impact protection, except when located in separate protected utility rooms. Dimensions of bollards. Bollards shall be a minimum of six-inch diameter filled with concrete. The bollard shall be set into the ground at a depth of at least 36 inches (three ft.) embedded in concrete at a minimum of 18 inches surrounding the bollard. The bollards must be a least 48 inches (four ft.) in height above the finish grade elevation. Any deviation of the stated requirements must be approved by the fire marshal and/or chief building inspector. The above dimensions shall serve as the requirement for installation; however, the fire marshal and/or chief building inspector shall have the authority to require more stringent dimensions to fit the needs of devices warranting impact protection. Color of bollards. Bollards should be of the following colors; yellow, amber or orange. All colors shall be of fluorescent or have a reflective coating. Any deviation of the stated requirements must be approved by the fire marshal and/chief building inspector. (City of Dover Code of Ordinances, 46-4) 25. Every house, building or structure used or intended for use as living quarters or as a place for conducting business, and having any wall facing or abutting any public or private street or alley, shall have displayed on that wall, in legible, easily read characters which are of contrasting color to the background, the proper street number for such house, building, or structure in accordance with the following: One-family and two-family residential structures, height, the number shall measure a minimum of four inches in height, location, the number shall be placed on the house above or to the left or right of 45

Item 5. the front entrance, color, the number shall be contrasting to the background color, Arabic numerals, all numbers shall be Arabic numerals. Multiple-family dwellings, measurements, the number shall measure a minimum of six inches when identifying individual apartments with exterior doors, and 12 inches when identifying buildings with apartment complexes where there are two or more buildings not assigned street addresses. Individual buildings with street addresses shall have numbers measuring six inches, location, numbers shall be placed either in the center of the building or on the street end of the building so as to be visible from either the public or private street or from the parking lot, color, numbers shall be contrasting to the background color, Arabic numerals, all numbers used shall be Arabic numerals. Commercial, industrial and office buildings, height, the numbers shall measure a minimum of 12 inches in height, location generally, numbers shall be placed either in the center of the building or on the street end of the building so as to be visible from either the public or private street or from the parking lot, property line or driveway, should the building be located far enough from a public or private road so that the numbers are not clearly visible from the street, then the street address shall also be posted on the property at or near the property line or driveway to said building, color; each building, numbers shall be contrasting to the background color and shall be placed on each building in the complex, Arabic numerals, all numbers used shall be Arabic numerals, Shopping centers. Shopping centers consisting of two or more stores shall have a tenant or suite number affixed to the front of the tenant space and on the outside of the rear door which corresponds with that tenant space. Numbers shall measure six inches in height. (City of Dover Code of Ordinances, 98-344) 26. A lock box (Knox) containing any and all means necessary for fire department access shall be provided at the following occupancies: any occupancy that contains a fire alarm signaling system that is monitored off-site, or any occupancy that contains an automatic sprinkler system. (2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 705, Chapter 5, 2.4) Secured key systems. When required; exemption. A secured key system shall be required for any new or existing building where a fire alarm or sprinkler system is being installed. It shall be the responsibility of the owner or occupant to keep a set of keys in the secured key box that are current to the locks of the protected occupancy. Buildings with 24-hour staffing or guard service shall be exempt from this subsection. Location. The secured key system shall be located as close to the main entrance as possible. Should the building design not allow the secured key system to be located by the main entrance, the fire marshal and fire chief shall come to an agreement as to an alternate location for the key box. A secured key system, once installed, shall not be obstructed from view or obstructed by any means that would delay the fire department access to the box. Required keys. Keys to be secured in the key box shall include keys to all points of ingress or egress, whether on the interior or exterior of the building, and keys to locked mechanical rooms, electrical rooms, elevator rooms, fire alarm and sprinkler controls and any area 46

Item 5. protected by automatic fire detection. Keys to individual residential apartment units are not required. Ordering responsibility. It shall be the responsibility of the general contractor to order the key box for new buildings. It shall be the responsibility of the owner or tenant to order the key box for existing buildings. Installation before testing. No acceptance test for sprinklers or fire alarms shall be conducted before the installation of a key box. (City Code of Ordinances 46-127) Knox Box to be mounted 6 feet above ground level 27. All required means of egress shall have an exit discharge consisting of a non-slip surface and leading to and terminating at a public way. 28. Project to be completed per approved Site Plan. 29. Full building and fire plan review is required. 30. Separate building permits/plans submission will be required for each building and/or tenant fit out. If the permit submission is for a “shell” a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued. Separate plans and permits submissions will be required for each “tenant fit out” at which time a Certificate of Occupancy will be issued upon compliance/completion of each “tenant fit out”. Each “shell” will require a fire permit for sprinkler and fire alarm if applicable. Those systems (for the “shell”) must be accepted into service prior to any “tenant fit out” fire permits being issued. 31. Construction or renovations cannot be started until building plans are approved. 32. Fire alarm systems, fire suppression systems, hoods, exhaust ducts, and hood suppression systems require a fire permit from the Fire Marshal’s Office. This work cannot be started until the permit is approved. 33. Building cannot be occupied by the public until a Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. ADDITIONAL / SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS TO OBTAIN APPROVAL: 1. State of Delaware Daycare Licensing approval is needed 2. State of Delaware Public Health approval is needed 3. Confirm that the Fie Lane is at least 10’ from the building APPLICABLE CODES LISTED BELOW (NOT LIMITED TO): 2015 NFPA 1 Fire Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2015 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 13 Installation of Sprinkler Systems (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2009 IBC (International Building Code) Latest editions of all other NFPA Codes as defined by the Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations City of Dover Code of Ordinances *If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person listed. 47

Item 5. CITY OF DOVER D E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE L APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D O T =============================================================== APPLICATION: JJ’s Learning Experience (756 South Little Creek Road) FILE#: C-21-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT CONTACT PERSON: Joshua Schwartz PHONE#: 302-760-2768 =============================================================== THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: No person, firm, corporation or the like shall construct, open, reconstruct, maintain, modify or use any crossing or entrance onto a state-maintained highway, street or road, including any drainage modifications leading into or carried by the highway drainage system, without first having complied with standards and regulations adopted by the Department and having obtained a permit issued by the Department. Please contact the Delaware Department of Transportation - Development Coordination section to begin permit process. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: 1. Schedule a pre-submittal meeting through DelDOT Subdivisions. 2. At a minimum a Record Plan approval will be required. 48

KENT CONSERVATION DISTRICT Item 5. 1679 SOUTH DUPONT HIGHWAY • DOVER, DELAWARE 19901• (302) 608-5370 • WWW.KENTCD.ORG CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY February 24, 2021 APPLICATION: JJ’s Learning Experience 2 Child Day Care Center at 756 South Little Creek Road FILE #: C-21-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: Kent Conservation District CONTACT PERSON: Katherine Owens PHONE #: 302-608-5370 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: Source: 2019 Delaware Sediment and Stormwater Regulations CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: Kent Conservation District has no objection to the conditional use site plan for the above referenced site. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: If at any time expansion or soil disturbance (e.g. clearing, grading, excavations, tree clearing, or stoning) exceeds 5,000 square feet, a Sediment and Stormwater Management Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Kent Conversation District. 49

Item 5. REVISIONS BY 1 CONDITIONAL USE SITE PLAN DATA COLUMN: 1 3-25-2021 MAS 1 DOVER PLANNING C2 DAYCARE NAME: JJ'S LEARNING EXPERIENCE 2 COMMISSION COMMENTS ADDRESS: SUITE I, 756 SOUTH LITTLE CREEK ROAD DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 HOURS & DAYS OF OPERATION: MONDAY -- FRIDAY 5:45 AM TO 7:00 PM SATURDAY 7:00 AM TO 12:00 PM SUNDAY CLOSED OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS: EMPIRE MEDICAL, LLC 1100 LA GRANGE PARKWAY, NEWARK, DE 19702 REPRESENTED BY MOHAMMED CHAUDRY TAX MAP NUMBER: ED-05-O77.00-01-030.000-000 10 LOT AREA: 2.39 ACRES EXISTING PARKING ZONING: C4 OCCUPANCY TYPE: PROPOSED GROUP I-4 DAYCARE BUILDING AREA: 33,143 S.F., EXISTING DAYCARE AREA: 10,111 S.F. PROPOSED DAYCARE CHANGE TO IMPERVIOUS: NEW CONCRETE DUMPSTER PAD - 211 S.F. 1 UP (2) NEW STAIRS TO GRADE - 84 S.F. SIDEWALK ON SOUTH SIDE - 472 S.F. SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE - 1,262 S.F. TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS - 2,029 S.F. NUMBER OF CHILDREN: 170 CHILDREN SUITE I 7 PROPOSED NUMBER OF ADULTS: 19 ADULTS PP EXISTING DAY CARE 1 PARKING PROPOSED 10,111± S.F. PARKING REQUIRED PARKING: 170 CHILDREN ÷ 10 CHILDREN PER SPACE = 17 PARKING SPACES 3 19 ADULTS ÷ 1 ADULT PER SPACE = 19 PARKING SPACES TOTAL REQUIRED = 36 PARKING SPACES BIKE RACK REQUIRED FOR MINIMUM 2 BIKES ACTUAL PARKING: EXISTING PLUS PROPOSED: 73 SPACES, INCLUDING 4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES. ONE ACCESSIBLE SPACE IS LOCATED IN THE EAST PARKING LOT. BIKE RACK FOR 5 BIKES LOCATED ON PLAN AND SPECIFIED ON C2. DROP OFF AREA IS SHOWN ON PLAN AND DOTTED SKIPS LINES FH SHOW EXIT FROM THE DROP-OFF AREA INTO A K-TURN. 11 DESIGNATED STAFF PARKING SOUTH LITTLE CREEK ROAD SPACES ARE SHOWN. DIRECT ACCESS TO PLAYGROUND VIA SOUTH DOOR IS SHOWN. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY: NEW PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK AND "PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC" CAUTION SIGNS SHOWN. ALSO, NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK IN THE PLAYGROUND AND ACCESSIBLE ASSESS TO THE FUTURE RETAIL EXISTING TREE PLAYGROUND IS SHOWN. SITE LIGHTING: FIVE EXISTING WALL PACKS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING ARE SHOWN. TWO NEW POLE MOUNTED LED DOWN-LIGHTS ARE SHOWN TO ILLUMINATE THE PARKING LOT. PAINT: ALL STRIPING SHALL BE 4" WIDE. ONLY VIVID AND DURABLE PAINT SHALL BE USED AND SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR STREET SURFACES. TYPICAL STRIPING SHALL BE WHITE. ACCESSIBLE SPACES, AISLES, AND INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY SHALL BE BLUE. YELLOW PAINT USED FOR FIRE LANES SHALL BE THE ACCEPTED YELLOW AS UTILIZED BY DELDOT. EMERGENCY SERVICES PERIMETER ACCESS: PER CITY FIRE MARSHAL, PERIMETER ACCESS SHALL BE 50% AND BE CLEARLY MARKED ON THE PLANS. PER DSFPR 705.4.5, MINIMUM WIDTH OF PERIMETER ACCESS SHALL BE 15' FROM FACE OF BUILDING, AT GRADE, WITH A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 10%. PARKING SHALL NOT BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 15' FROM THE FACE OF THE BUILDING. 8'-0" ACTUAL: PERIMETER ACCESS IS 783' OF THE PERIMETER, FOR 89%, AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS EXISTING USING DASHED LINE. PARKING IS MINIMUM 15' (8' FOR 7 SPACES) FROM FACE OF BUILDING. 25'-3" MEDICAL OFFICE 7 DESIGN OF FIRE LANES: PER CITY FIRE MARSHAL, FIRE LANES SHALL COVER 25% OF THE BUILDING. PER DSFPR 705.6.2, WIDTH OF FIRE LANES SHALL BE MINIMUM 24' WIDE. PER 705.6.4 AND 705.6.5, THE 5 SO TH LITTLE CREEK ROAD F PROPOSED CLOSEST EDGE OF FIRE LANES SHALL BE MINIMUM 10' AND NO FURTHER THAN 50' FROM THE PARKING EXTERIOR WALL OF THE BUILDING. PER 705.6.4.1, WHERE PARKING IS LOCATED BETWEEN BUILDING AND FIRE LANE, PARKING SHALL BE MINIMUM 15' FROM THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE CONDITIONAL SE SITE PLAN FOR BUILDING. 31'-8" ACTUAL: FIRE LANES ARE EXISTING AND COVER 407' OF THE PERIMETER, FOR 49%. THE 13 CLOSEST EDGE OF THE FIRE LANES FROM THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE BUILDING VARIES, AS DIMENSIONED (5'-6", 11'-0", 31'-8", AND 25'-3" ) EXISTING JJ S LEARNING PARKING MARKING OF FIRE LANES: PER DSFPR 705.7, BOTH INNER AND OUTER EDGES OF THE FIRE LANE SHALL BE MARLED WITH 4" WIDE SOLID YELLOW DEMARCATION LINE. FIRE LANE SIGNS SHALL BE LOCATED MAXIMUM 150' APART AND PLACED AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF THE FIRE LANE, FACING ONCOMING TRAFFIC, AT 6' TO 8' ABOVE THE PAVEMENT. WHERE PARKING IS RESTRICTED, "NO PARKING" SHALL BE PAINTED PP IN THE SPACE WITH WORDS MINIMUM 6' HIGH AND 12' IN LENGTH. WHERE PARKING IS NOT 4 RESTRICTED, ROADWAY MARKINGS SHALL USE THE WORDS "FIRE" AND "LANE," IN LIEU OF SIGNS, MINIMUM10' HIGH, SPACED NO MORE THAN 30' APART, REPEATED AT 100' INTERVALS. 01 ACTUAL: DEMARCATION LINES AND "FIRE" "LANE" MARKINGS ARE EXISTING. NEW LOCATIONS BABB DRIVE EXISTING FOR FIRE LANE SIGNS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. E PERIENCE 2 DOVER DELAWARE 1 PARKING EXISTING 22 OUTDOOR PLAY AREA: REQUIRED OUTDOOR PLAYGROUND AREA = 75 S.F. x (.25 x NO. OF CHILDREN) PARKING 75 S.F. x (.25 x 170) = 75 S.F. x 43 = 3,224 S.F. REQUIRED 7 EXISTING S ITE I ACTUAL = 3,284± S.F. PROPOSED FENCED IN OUTDOOR PLAY AREA PARKING J.H. BROWN BOULEVARD TREES: 10,111 S.F. ÷ 3,000 S.F. PER TREE = 4 TREES REQUIRED ACTUAL: 3 TREES EXISTING + 1 PROPOSED TREE = 4 TREES TRASH COLLECTION: PROPOSED LOCATION OF NEW SCREENED DUMPSTER IS SHOWN. TRASH COLLECTION SHALL BE CONTRACTED BY OWNER. NO TRASH WILL ACCUMULATE ON THE SITE. CONDITIONAL OWNER CERTIFICATION: I, MOHAMMAD CHAUDRY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER AND LESSOR OF JJ'S LEARNING EXPERIENCE 2 SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, AND THAT THE PLAN WAS MADE AT MY SE SITE PLAN DIRECTION, AND THAT I ACKNOWLEDGE THE SAME TO BE MY ACT AND DESIRE THE PLAN BE DEVELOPED AS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND DATA COL MN DATE: SIGNATURE: (OWNER/LESSOR) DATE: SIGNATURE: (LESSEE) SHAWANDA JOHNSON 1 DRAWN MAS DRAWING LIST: CHECKED D W.B. A RO C1 CONDITIONAL USE SITE PLAN AND DATA COLUMN DATE AY UT HB 3 FEBR ARY 2021 1 SO C2 CONDITIONAL USE ENLARGED SITE PLAN AND DETAILS SCALE N CONDITIONAL USE SITE PLAN NOTED JOB NO. AND PARKING LAYOUT PROJECT C1 3 -1120 1" = 30' NORTH SHEET C1 PROJECT SITE LOCATION MAP 1" = 200'± OF SHEETS 50

Item 5. REVISIONS BY 4" SOLID MASONRY 1 3-25-2021 MAS CAP DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS " TE '-8 RE 10 NC CO R T ING O TE 3 IS FO EX OT T E CA P C2 8" CMU PAINTED BOTH OF L R E 4 " SIDES WITH DARK GE ING ON C TH GRAY EXTERIOR ED ARK " C W I UM ACRYLIC LATEX PAINT, P 0 L I N IM UM LED DOWN-LIGHT ON POLE, 2 L M IM COLOR TO MATCH THE REFER 10/C2 2 EXISTING "x WA 4" MIN AL 12 U 2 B '- EXISTING EXTERIOR TREES CM E T " Ø PIC LA 13 8 " S 12 TY S 4" DARK GRAY FINISH "STAFF PARKING" E I PE E IN ER, ET SYSTEM ON THE SIGNS, REFER 8/C2 P D T R L A O EE GR FO NC H WEST AND PARTIAL T CO ":12" L US NORTH ELEVATIONS; "ADA PARKING" S W T E D 4 F 10 "STAFF PARKING" 6" ELO RE R CE N 1/ BE E APPLIED DIRECTLY TO SIGN, REFER B ON C O W L L T E 90° 7/C2 SIGNS, REFER 8/C2 C E INF DO S HA CRE AT CMU EXISTING PARKING R E D E ON G E 12'-0" 4" LOP R ET G C U BL ING 4" WIDE BLUE ADA SYMBOL, S NC TIN DO XIS T 7'-4" PARKING, AND WALKWAY NEW PARKING N CO XIS LOT K E BUMPERS, TYPICAL W E LIN E STRIPING 5'-0" NE ITH KING A IN E TH FOR 10 W AR CH BOV T 4" REINFORCED "FIRE LANE" SIGNS PROJECT P H A O FACE BOTH DIRECTIONS, ' HIG 6" G L CONCRETE SLAB, " NORTH 6 ET KIN I PE SLOPED AS SHOWN '-0 REFER 6/C2 R3 S AR STR TE (EDGE AT OPENING 6 P NE RE LA NC SHALL BE FLUSH WITH E CO EXISTING CONCRETE PROPOSED SCREENED FIR TIN G PARKING LOT) G IS DUMPSTER AND S TIN EX OT CONCRETE PAD E XI F O L 6'-0" 1'-0" G E ING EXPANSION JOINT TYP. R3 ED ARK 6'- P EXISTING FIRE LANE 12'-0" LED DOWN-LIGHT ON 0" MARKINGS POLE, REFER 10/C2 1/4":12" SLOPE EXISTING GRADE 2'-0" NEW "FIRE LANE" SIGN, 2 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN TYP. 24'-0" REFER 6/C2 EXISTING WALL PACK NEW STEPS 4" WIDE DOTTED NEW PEDESTRIAN 2 SKIPS, PAINTED COMPACTED FILL CROSSWALK STRIPING, 1'-0" 2'-0" DROP OFF AREA 5-BIKE RACK, REFER 4/C2 1/4" = 1'-0" WHITE, TYPICAL 12'-0" 2'-0" MINIMUM WHITE PAINT, TYPICAL C1 TYP. TYP. 11'-0" "DROP OFF AREA" SIGN, 24'-4" 32'-5" REFER 9/C2 NEW ENTRANCE- EXISTING WALL 5'-6" 5'-0" EXIT PACK CONCRETE FOOTER WITH TWO #4 BARS, 1'-0" EXISTING WALL CONTINUOUS NEW PACK EXISTING WALL PACKS PEDESTRIAN M ENTRANCE/EXIT FOR CROSSWALK MU STRIPING, SCHOOL AGED CHILDREN INI 1'-8" "M '-0 3 WHITE PAINT 25 NEW RAILING 3,284± S.F. 44'-5" WALL SECTION SUITE I RAMP, WHICH IS PART OF PROPOSED PROPOSED DAY CARE ACCESSIBLE PATH TO PLAYGROUND DAYCARE PLAYGROUND @ DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 7 10,111± S.F. 3/4" = 1'-0" 0" 2'- P. 0 " TY PROPOSED PARKING 6'- " 1'-0 P. T Y PP PROPOSED TREE NEW "PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC" SIGNS NEW 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK REFER 5/C2 NEW PARKING BUMPERS, TYPICAL FOR 7 20'-6" NEW 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE EXISTING PARKING PROPOSED NEW EGRESS "STAFF PARKING" SIGNS, CORRIDOR TYPICAL FOR 7, MOUNTED TO WALL, REFER 8/C2 DIRECT PATH TO 5 SO TH LITTLE CREEK ROAD PLAYGROUND 3 62'-4" CONDITIONAL SE SITE PLAN FOR FH EXISTING CURB 31'-8" 4 PROPOSED 5-BIKE RACK 250 WATT LED DOWN-LIGHT FIXTURE ATTACHED TO LIGHT POLE JJ S LEARNING N.T.S. -- GLOBAL INDUSTRIES ITEM #T9F652770 OR EQUIVALENT 16'± LIGHT POLE 1 CONDITIONAL USE N BOLT PLATE COVER 10 1/2" x 10 1/2" x 4" 3/4" x 30" ANCHOR BOLTS, TYPICAL ENLARGED SITE PLAN PROJECT BOLT PLATE 10 1/2" x 10 1/2" X 3/8" 01 1/16" = 1'-0" NORTH NON-SHRINK GROUT AFTER DOVER DELAWARE 1 MOUNTING AND LEVELING POLE E PERIENCE 2 SLOPE CONCRETE FOR DRAINAGE 3" S ITE I WHITE LETTERS RED LETTERS BLUE LETTERS SYMBOLS & SYMBOLS & SYMBOLS & BLACK LETTERS BLACK LETTERS 1'-6" 1'-0" BORDER BORDER BORDER & BORDER & BORDER GRADE RESERVED DAYCARE NO YELLOW WHITE BACKGROUND BACKGROUND BACKGROUND PARKING BACKGROUND 2'-0" BACKGROUND WHITE WHITE STAFF CONDITIONAL 1'-6" ________ PARKING WHITE DROP-OFF ONLY AREA SE ENLARGED EXISTING SITE PLAN AND 2" RND. GALV. 2" RND. GALV. 2" RND. GALV. 2" RND. GALV. 6'-0" MINIMUM 6'-0" MINIMUM RAMP AND STEEL PIPE STEEL PIPE STEEL PIPE STEEL PIPE RAILING PVC CONDUIT DETAILS EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING 5'-0" MINIMUM PAVING PAVING PAVING PAVING 3,000 PSI CONCRETE BASE CAST AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH 1'-9" 1'-9" CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE APPROXIMATE #3 REBAR WITH #3 REBAR TIES @ 12" O.C. DRAWN MAS GRADE CHECKED W.B. 8" 8" DATE 3 FEBR ARY 2021 NOTE: STAFF PARKING SIGNS AT BUILDING DO NOT NEED SCALE PIPE AND SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE CMU WALL 3" NOTED JOB NO. C1 3 -1120 5 PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC 6 "FIRE LANE" 7 ADA PARKING 8 STAFF PARKING 9 DROP OFF AREA 10 LIGHT POLE AND SHEET 1 SIGN ELEVATION 1/2" = 1'-0" SIGN ELEVATION 1/2" = 1'-0" SIGN ELEVATION 1/2" = 1'-0" SIGN ELEVATION 1/2" = 1'-0" SIGN ELEVATION 1/2" = 1'-0" BASE DETAIL 3/4" = 1'-0" 3" 1'-6" 3" C2 OF SHEETS 51

Item 5. REVISIONS BY CONDITIONAL USE SITE PLAN DATA COLUMN: DAYCARE NAME: JJ'S LEARNING EXPERIENCE 2 ADDRESS: SUITE I, 756 SOUTH LITTLE CREEK ROAD DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 HOURS & DAYS OF OPERATION: MONDAY -- FRIDAY 5:45 AM TO 7:00 PM SATURDAY 7:00 AM TO 12:00 PM SUNDAY CLOSED 2 EXISTING OWNER'S NAME TREES AND ADDRESS: EMPIRE MEDICAL, LLC 1100 LA GRANGE PARKWAY, NEWARK, DE 19702 PROPOSED REPRESENTED BY MOHAMMED CHAUDRY SCREENED DUMPSTER & TAX MAP NUMBER: ED-05-O77.00-01-030.000-000 CONCRETE 10 PAD LOT AREA: 2.39 ACRES EXISTING PARKING ZONING: C4 ENTRANCE/EXIT OCCUPANCY TYPE: PROPOSED GROUP I-2 DAYCARE FOR SCHOOL NEW STEPS AGED BUILDING AREA: 33,143 S.F., EXISTING CHILDREN NEW ENTRANCE/EXIT NEW RAILING DAYCARE AREA: 10,111 S.F. PROPOSED DAYCARE NEW RAMP UP NUMBER OF CHILDREN: 170 CHILDREN UP F F NUMBER OF ADULTS: 19 ADULTS 3,280± S.F. PROPOSED REQUIRED PARKING: 170 CHILDREN ÷ 10 CHILDREN PER SPACE = 17 PARKING SPACES S S S S DAYCARE 19 ADULTS ÷ 1 ADULT PER SPACE = 19 PARKING SPACES PLAYGROUND TOTAL REQUIRED = 36 PARKING SPACES 7 SUITE I EXISTING PROPOSED ACTUAL PARKING: EXISTING PLUS PROPOSED: 73 SPACES, INCLUDING 3 ACCESSIBLE SPACES PP PARKING PROPOSED PARKING DAY CARE 10,111± S.F. OUTDOOR PLAY AREA: REQUIRED OUTDOOR PLAYGROUND AREA = 75 S.F. x (.25 x NO. OF CHILDREN) 3 PROPOSED 75 S.F. x (.25 x 170) = 75 S.F. x 43 = 3,224 S.F. REQUIRED TREE ACTUAL = 3,280± S.F. PROPOSED FENCED IN OUTDOOR PLAY AREA S S S S TREES: 10,111 S.F. ÷ 3,000 S.F. PER TREE = 4 TREES REQUIRED ACTUAL: 3 TREES EXISTING + 1 PROPOSED TREE = 4 TREES FH TRASH COLLECTION: PROPOSED LOCATION OF NEW SCREENED DUMPSTER IS SHOWN. TRASH COLLECTION SHALL BE CONTRACTED BY OWNER. NO TRASH WILL ACCUMULATE ON THE SITE. SOUTH LITTLE CREEK ROAD OWNER CERTIFICATION: I, MOHAMMAD CHAUDRY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER AND LESSOR OF JJ'S LEARNING EXPERIENCE 2 SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, AND THAT THE PLAN WAS MADE AT MY DIRECTION, AND THAT I ACKNOWLEDGE THE SAME TO BE MY ACT AND DESIRE THE PLAN BE S DEVELOPED AS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FUTURE RETAIL EXISTING TREE DATE: SIGNATURE: (OWNER/LESSOR) F DATE: SIGNATURE: (LESSEE) SHAWANDA JOHNSON S F F S F F F F S F EXISTING SO TH LITTLE CREEK ROAD MEDICAL F OFFICE S 6 CONDITIONAL SE SITE PLAN FOR F PROPOSED PARKING JJ S LEARNING 13 EXISTING PARKING PP J.H. BROWN BOULEVARD 4 E PERIENCE DOVER DELAWARE BABB DRIVE EXISTING PARKING S ITE I EXISTING 23 PARKING 7 EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONAL SE SITE PLAN AND DATA COL N AD RO Y H BA UT DRAWN SO AS CHECKED W.B. DATE FEBR ARY PROJECT SITE SCALE NOTED N JOB NO. CONDITIONAL USE C SHEET SITE PLAN AND PARKING LAYOUT PROJECT LOCATION MAP C NORTH 1" = 30' 1" = 200'± OF SHEETS 52

Item 6. PETITION TO AMEND ZONING DISTRICT Public Hearing Before the Planning Commission April 19, 2021 Owner: Silver Linings Holdings Corp. c/o Tolano Anderson Address: 630 W. Division Street, Dover DE Location: South side of W. Division Street opposite Ridgely Street Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.08-01-40.01-000 Size: 1.08 acres (47,275.3 SF.) Present Use: Professional Office Proposed Use: Office and Residential Comprehensive Plan Designation: Mixed-Use Present Zoning: C-3 (Service Commercial Zone) and COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) Proposed Zoning: C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) and COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) Reason for Request: To amend the zoning of the 1.08+/- acre parcel at 630 W. Division Street, Dover DE 19904 from C-3 to C-2A. To partially convert the existing office building to include Apartment Units. File Number: Z-21-03 Ordinance Number: 2021-07 53

Item 6. Z-21-03 Lands of Silver Linings Holding Corporation at 630 W Division St DAC Report of April 7, 2021 Page 2 This rezoning application consists of one parcel of land totaling 1.08 +/- acres located on the south side of W. Division Street opposite the intersection with Ridgely Street. The property is zoned C-3 (Service Commercial Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning is C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) while remaining subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The owner of record is Silver Linings Holding Corporation c/o Tolano Anderson. Property Address: 630 W. Division Street. Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.08-01- 40.01-000. Existing Property: The property has frontage along West Division Street to the north and contains a professional office building. Vehicle access to the site is via a shared access with the neighboring property to the east (650 West Division Street) off of West Division Street. While there is a sidewalk along the West Division Street frontage, there is no dedicated pedestrian access from this sidewalk into the site. Almost the entire property is either paved or covered by the existing building. The applicant is seeking rezoning to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) to allow for Apartments to be established in addition to the existing Professional Office Use. The COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) will remain. Any change of use of the site will be subject to permit submissions. This application only seeks rezoning of the property from C-3 to C-2A; the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) designation will remain. Previous Application: This property was recently subject to Rezoning Application Z-20-03 Lands of Telano D. Anderson at 630 West Division Street, which sought to rezone the property from the existing C-3 (Service Commercial Zone) to IO (Institutional and Office Zone) while retaining the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) designation. This rezoning was sought to allow for the establishment of an Emergency Shelter which is a permitted use in the IO zoning district. The Z-20-03 Rezoning Application received a Recommendation of Approval from the Planning Commission at their November 2020 meeting. However, the Application was ultimately denied by the City Council at their December 14, 2020 meeting and the Rezoning of the property to IO was consequently not permitted. Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding parcels are all zoned commercial. The property immediately adjacent on the east and south of the property is zoned C-3 and contains a mini-storage facility. Immediately adjacent to the west is another property zoned C-3 which contains a car wash facility. Across West Division Street to the north are properties again zoned C-3 and also C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone), containing a variety of commercial uses. The subject property, as well as the surrounding parcels have a Land Use Category of Mixed Use. This is with the exception of the parcels to north and east of the subject property (across West Division Street but immediately east of Ridgley Street) which have a Land Use Category of Industrial. Comprehensive Plan: In the 2019 Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Plan (Map 12-1) recommends that this property be used for Mixed Use. The 2019 Comprehensive Plan references Mixed Use land use category on page 12-7. The following is an excerpt from the 2019 Comprehensive Plan regarding Mixed Use land uses (page 12-8): 54

Item 6. Z-21-03 Lands of Silver Linings Holdings LLC DAC Report of April 7, 2021 Page 3 Recommendation for Downtown Dover – Historic Core and Center City: Mixed Use Area: Downtown Dover is the City’s primary Mixed Use area. The historic City center clustered around The Green dates back as early as the 1700s. It expands to also include the traditional City pattern of grid streets which developed during the 19th and early 20th centuries. As a result of its earlier development, Downtown Dover, like many other historic cities, includes a variety of intermingled land uses. The Downtown area, which includes the traditional Loockerman Street business district, is broadly bounded by Wesley College on the north, the railroad tracks on the west, Bayhealth-Kent General Hospital on the south, and St. Jones River on the east. It includes a street level mix of residential, commercial, office, cultural, and institutional uses. Downtown Dover is the traditional and symbolic center of the community and is vitally important to the overall image and identity of the City. As the State’s office complex and other businesses and services make Downtown the largest area of employment in the City, Downtown Dover is vital to the economy. It is important to preserve the area as a safe, convenient, and aesthetically pleasing business environment. Downtown provides a unique and affordable commercial environment where locally owned businesses reflect the small-town nature of the community. Downtown also provides a residential environment with a wide variety of housing types near commercial, cultural, education, and employment resources. The age of the buildings and infrastructure in the Downtown area requires special attention and incentives to assist in continual use and revitalization activities. Downtown lacks the vibrancy of years gone by and its revitalization will hinge on mixed land uses and developing a commercial niche. Removal of blighted conditions, rehabilitation and redevelopment of traditional residential areas, and reestablishment of neighborhood identity will be important components of the City’s strategies and initiatives. The goal of the Land Development Plan is to enhance the role of Downtown Dover as a major employment, residential and commercial center as well as the symbolic and cultural heart of the community. Efforts should strive to recognize its unique heritage and historic resources and to provide for mixed use development allowing greatest variation of uses, Activities to reestablish the economic and social vitality of Downtown neighborhoods are encouraged. The Rezoning Request is consistent with the Land Use Classification of Mixed Use. Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix (from the 2019 Comprehensive Plan) specifies that the following zones are compatible with this land use classification. C-2 (Central Commercial) (Downtown Redevelopment Target Area Only) C-2A (Limited Central Commercial) TND (Traditional Neighborhood Design) C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) C-1A (Limited Commercial) RGO (General Residence and Office) (Downtown Redevelopment Target Area Only) Mixed-Use R-8 (One Family Residence) R-10 (One Family Residence) RG-1 (General Residence) RG-2 (General Residence) RG-4 (General Resident - Multi-Story Apartments) C-3 (Service Commercial) CPO (Commercial and Professional Office) IO (Institutional and Office) 55

Item 6. Z-21-03 Lands of Silver Linings Holdings LLC DAC Report of April 7, 2021 Page 4 Request for C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) Zoning • The following description of the C-2A zoning district is provided from Article 3 §14 of the Zoning Ordinance. Article 3 Section 14. – Limited Central Commercial Zone (C-2A). 14.1 Uses permitted. No building or premises shall be used and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except the following: (a) Retail Stores (b) Business, professional or government offices (c) Personal service establishments. (d) Restaurants. (e) Service establishments. (f) Hotels. (g) Places of public assembly. (h) Drive-throughs. (i) One family residences, including attached and semi-detached dwellings, complying with the bulk standards of the RG-1 (General Residence) zone. (j) Apartments and multi-family dwellings 14.2 Conditional Uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general conditions set forth in article 10, section 1: (a) Parking lots and parking structures as a principal use on suitably landscaped lots. (b) Fuel pumps accessory to a permitted use. 14.3 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than off street parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for outdoor eating areas associated with restaurants and outdoor sales areas approved by the city planner. 14.4 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in article 5, section 8.1. 14.5 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for any change of use. COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) The purpose and requirements of the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) are given in Article 3 §27 of the Zoning Ordinance. The COZ-1 regulations include the following: 27.1 Purpose. The corridor overlay zone (COZ) is established for the following reasons: (a) To promote superior urban corridor development and the highest quality built environment; 56

Item 6. Z-21-03 Lands of Silver Linings Holdings LLC DAC Report of April 7, 2021 Page 5 (b) To foster coordination and linkage among corridor properties and with adjacent lands; (c) To preserve the functionality and efficiency of the roadway for traffic movement; and (d) To achieve a visually balanced streetscape environment which is friendly to the pedestrian and motorist alike. 27.2 Superior urban design. For the purposes of this ordinance the term "superior urban design" shall meet the following criteria: (a) Superior urban design places a strict and primary importance on the pedestrian. The concept should lend itself to interconnectivity while presenting building structures as aspects of the street, not simply islands existing in the "sea of roads". The design should encourage fewer car-trips, as well as promote automobile trips on an interconnected local street system rather than trips that utilize the arterials. In demonstrating superior urban design, an applicant must show that the plan presented exceeds the requirements of the zoning ordinance in at least two of the following areas: (i) Transportation amenities for bicycles, pedestrians and transit that exceed those required by the zoning ordinance; (ii) Architectural features including, but not limited to: LEED-certified buildings; unique architecture not replicated in other locations; use of architectural elements such as entry porticos, porte-cocheres, colonnades, cornices, porch columns and balusters, band courses, coins, water tables and other trim that enhances visual quality and function of the structure; and use of the highest-quality construction materials. (iii) Landscaping that exceeds the requirements of this section, including robust use of trees, shrubbery, and flowering plants to screen parked cars; water gardens and ponds; arboretums; tree preservation measures; (iv) Public spaces and art including, but not limited to, sculpture, memorials, murals, public court yards and pocket parks, and fountains; (v) Green technologies for stormwater management, as well as green energy technologies such as geothermal heating and cooling and solar energy supplies. (b) The city planner shall develop policy guidance on how the concept of superior urban design will be evaluated. 27.3 Zone boundaries. The COZ encompasses the lands adjacent to the following roadways as outlined on the City of Dover Zoning Map as set forth in article 2, section 2 of this ordinance: (a) Delaware Route 8 (Forrest and Division Streets) from the railroad tracks in a westerly direction to the city limit line. (b) McKee/Saulsbury Road (County Road 156) from the intersection at Dennys Road (County Road 100) in a southerly direction to the terminal intersection with West North Street (County Road 73). 27.4 Permitted uses. Land use shall be governed by those provisions of this ordinance related to the specific zoning district designations of each property as depicted on the zoning map. 57

Item 6. Z-21-03 Lands of Silver Linings Holdings LLC DAC Report of April 7, 2021 Page 6 27.5 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with article 10, section 2 shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for any change in use. When the zoning district regulations specify that a particular use requires conditional use approval in accordance with article 10, section 1, the provisions of that article shall apply. Site development plans and conditional use site plans for properties within the COZ shall reflect compliance with the development guidelines of this article, in addition to all other applicable codes and regulations. 27.6 Development guidelines. 27.61 Setbacks: a. Front yards. Residential Nonresidential Min. Max. Min. Max. McKee/Saulsbury 60' to 80' 40' to 50' * Route 8—Artis Drive to Mifflin Road 60' to 80' None Route 8—Mifflin Road to Saulsbury 40' to 60' 40' to 60' * Road Route 8—Saulsbury Road to R.R. line 20' to 30' 20' to 30' Subdivision streets (Setback provisions of article 4 shall apply) * When the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission through the site plan review process that the proposal involves a superior urban design, the maximum setback may be increased to no more than 90 feet from the property line on Route 8 from Mifflin Road to Saulsbury Road and on McKee and Saulsbury Roads. 27.62 Building placement. Buildings shall be situated on the property so as to maximize the use of the frontage along the roadway and shall have the longest side of the building arranged parallel and square to the roadway. When the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission that, due to specific constraints related to lot configuration, alternative building placements may be permitted. 27.63 Parking. (a) Location. Parking shall not be permitted to be situated within the front yard, nor between the right-of-way line and the building, except in the following instances: (i) Automobile service stations; (ii) Properties in a shopping center (SC) zoning district, in which case, parking may be permitted between the building and the roadway, provided that such parking [shall] be limited to five rows of single parking spaces between the road and the storefront; (iii) When the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission through the site plan review process that the design presented involves a superior urban design, parking may be permitted between the building 58

Item 6. Z-21-03 Lands of Silver Linings Holdings LLC DAC Report of April 7, 2021 Page 7 and the street, provided that such parking within this area shall be adequately landscaped and screened from the roadway. (b) Required number of spaces. See specific district requirements in article 4. (c) Layout. (i) Parking lots shall be arranged in such a manner so that not more than 20 parking spaces in a row shall be permitted without a landscaped island. No more than six rows of 20 spaces shall be provided without provision for a landscaped median. Parking islands shall be a minimum of ten feet wide and planting medians shall be no less than eight feet wide. (ii) There shall be a landscaped buffer area of at least 12 feet in width between the building and parking lot and drive areas. The buffer area shall include provisions for a sidewalk of at least six feet and no greater than eight feet in width. The buffer area and sidewalk shall be grade separated from the parking lot by concrete curbing of at least six inches in height. (d) Landscaping. Design shall be simple and easy to maintain and shall consist of a combination of hardy canopy trees, low evergreen shrubs and turf grass, and shall be designed in accordance with landscape guidelines set forth in article 5, section 15 of this ordinance and as follows: (i) Interior landscaping. A minimum of five percent of the interior area of a parking lot shall be reserved for landscape purposes. This provision shall include the landscaping of all required parking islands and medians. Shade trees shall be incorporated within the landscaped islands whenever and wherever practicable. (ii) Parking lot screening adjacent to public right-of-way. Low profile screening shall be required when parking spaces would result in vehicles facing onto the roadway. Screening may consist of a low wall, evergreen hedge with a minimum height of two feet at the time of planting, planted three feet apart on center, and a maximum height of three feet at maturity, or earth berm. Should a low wall be used, such wall shall be accompanied by evergreen shrub plantings on the roadway side of the wall and spaced ten feet apart on center. (iii) Reserved. 27.64 Site access. (a) Entrance width and radii. Site entrances shall have a minimum width of 24 feet. Entrances involving a median divider shall be at least 35 feet in width. Entrance radii shall be a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet. (b) Number of entrances and curb cut spacing. One curb cut shall be permitted for each street which abuts a site. For sites with street frontage in excess of 300 linear feet, one additional curb cut may be permitted. For sites with street frontage in excess of 600 linear feet, two additional curb cuts may be permitted. Multiple curb cuts on a property shall have a minimum spacing distance in accordance with the following schedule: 59

Item 6. Z-21-03 Lands of Silver Linings Holdings LLC DAC Report of April 7, 2021 Page 8 Speed Limit Maximum Spacing (Ft.) 25 105 30 125 35 150 40 185 45 230 50 275 (c) [Shared access.] Shared access shall be provided, whenever possible, for entrances to adjoining uses, including residential driveways. (d) [Cross access.] Cross access shall be provided among abutting uses of similar use categories, whenever possible, to provide linkage between properties as an alternative to re-entering the corridor to access both existing and future neighboring properties. (e) Entrance locations for adjoining properties. Commercial site entrances shall be no closer than 25 feet to an adjoining property which is zoned residential and no closer than ten feet to an adjoining property which is in a nonresidential zoning category. 27.65 [Signs.] Signs shall meet the regulations found in article 5, section 4, supplementary sign regulations. 27.66 Building height. (a) Buildings shall be limited in overall height to 35 feet and shall not exceed two stories. 27.67 Open space and landscaping. (a) Lot coverage. Each lot shall have a minimum of 25 percent of the lot area dedicated to be landscaped open space. A lesser amount of landscaped open space may be permitted when it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the planning commission, through the site plan review process, that, due to lot configuration and existing built conditions, the required minimum is impractical. (b) Frontage. Each lot shall have a landscaped open space of at least 25 feet in width, measured from the back of curb along the entire frontage of the lot, except at points of site access. Trees shall be provided along the frontage perimeter at a minimum rate of one tree for each 50 linear feet of frontage. (c) Side and rear yards. A minimum of 15 feet of landscaped open space shall be provided along all side and rear lot lines when abutting a residential use and a minimum of five feet when abutting a nonresidential use. Tree plantings shall be provided along all nonfrontage perimeters at a minimum rate of one tree for each 75 linear feet. (d) Stormwater detention ponds. Detention ponds may be counted toward the minimum 25 percent open space area, provided that such ponds are designed to emulate natural features by incorporating irregular outline, gradual slopes (no greater than 1:4), and appropriate landscape plantings. 60

Item 6. Z-21-03 Lands of Silver Linings Holdings LLC DAC Report of April 7, 2021 Page 9 (e) Landscaping. Landscaped open spaces shall be designed in accordance with the provisions of this section, as well as the landscaping guidelines as set forth in article 5, section 9 of this ordinance. (f) Screening. The following items shall be located so as to minimize visibility from the roadway, adjacent properties and other public areas, and shall be screened from public view: (1) Service bays; (2) Loading docks and platforms; (3) Rooftop utilities; (4) Satellite dishes; (5) Dumpsters; (6) Storage areas. (g) Standard for tree plantings. Trees shall be of a high canopy variety and shall be limbed to a minimum height of 12 feet above grade at maturity. (h) Standards for shrubbery. Shrubbery shall be of a low evergreen variety and shall be limited to use as foundation plantings and for screening purposes. (i) Standards for ground cover. Ground cover shall be limited to turf and ornamental grasses and ornamental evergreen ground cover plantings within required landscape areas. 27.68 Lot configuration. All lots within the corridor overlay district created after the enactment of this section shall conform to the following: (a) Minimum lot area [shall be] 10,000 square feet. Service stations [shall have a minimum lot area of] 20,000 square feet. (b) Minimum lot depth shall be 100 feet. In the C-3 (service commercial) district, the minimum lot depth shall be 150 feet. (c) Minimum road frontage shall be at least 100 feet. In the C-3 (service commercial) district, the minimum road frontage shall be 150 feet. 27.69 Architectural review. The side of any building which faces the corridor (or corridors) shall be referred to as the "corridor elevation." Buildings in the COZ-1 shall be designed to front on the corridor, and the corridor elevation shall contain architectural elements traditionally associated with the front of a building. Blank walls without functioning windows are prohibited along the corridor. Windows must be incorporated into the overall design concept of the corridor elevation. Providing one or several small windows on a large corridor elevation shall not constitute compliance with this ordinance. A "functioning window" shall be defined as a window which lets light into the interior of the structure, and is integrated and related to the interior layout of the space. In addition to functioning windows, the corridor elevation shall have the following elements: (a) A primary entrance door or doors (except for loading doors). (b) A primary entrance feature, such as a porch, portico, awning, entrance walk, or other similar feature. 61

Item 6. Z-21-03 Lands of Silver Linings Holdings LLC DAC Report of April 7, 2021 Page 10 In addition, the corridor elevation shall have one of the following elements: (a) Landscaping integrated into the building design concept. (b) Architectural or urban design elements which link adjacent structures together, such as plazas, walkways, colonnades, or similar features. (c) Architectural relief, such as vertical and horizontal offsets in exterior wall elevations, band courses, lintels and sill courses, cornices, and the like, to create shadow lines. The applicant shall submit 12 copies of the corridor elevation at the time of application. The city planner or his/her designee shall determine whether compliance with the provisions of this ordinance has been achieved. 27.7 Properties located on a corner lot with two frontages within the Corridor Overlay Zone. When a property is located on the corner of two corridors within the Corridor Overlay Zone, only one of the two corridors shall be subject to the requirements of Section 27.61 Setbacks and Section 27.63 Parking, Subsection (a) Location. The frontage of the property on which the identifiable front of the building is located shall be the frontage that is subject to the requirements of Section 27.61 And Section 27.63, Subsection (a). In designing the site, in order to qualify for the relief under this subsection, the applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission that the design incorporates the principles of superior urban design as defined in Section 27.2. Zoning Definitions: Apartment: A dwelling unit, within a building with other uses and/or dwelling units, that is intended for use as a residence by an individual or a single family. Dwelling unit: A building or entirely self-contained portion thereof containing complete housekeeping facilities for only one family, including any domestic servants employed on the premises, and having no enclosed space (other than vestibules, entrance or other hallways or porches) or cooking or sanitary facilities in common with any other dwelling unit. A boarding[house] or roominghouse, convalescent home, dormitory, fraternity or sorority house, hotel, inn, lodging, nursing, or other similar home, travel trailer, recreational vehicle, or other similar structures or vehicles shall not be deemed to constitute a dwelling unit. Recommendation of the Planning Staff: Staff recommends that the Rezoning be granted to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) while retaining the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) as requested, as the proposed zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the Mixed Use land use classification. The use as a Professional Office Building with Apartments is permitted in the C-2A Zone. Were the application for Rezoning to be recommended by the Planning Commission and subsequently approved by the City Council, the applicant would still have to submit Building Permits for the change of use in order for the Apartment use of the site to be established. During that review process it will be determined if any site improvements are required. This recommendation is being made without that benefit of hearing the comments of surrounding landowners and residents. A public hearing is required on this matter and the Planning Commission should give those comments consideration. 62

Item 6. Z-21-03 Lands of Silver Linings Holdings LLC DAC Report of April 7, 2021 Page 11 ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: 1) The applicant shall be aware that approval of any rezoning application does not represent a Building Permit, Sign Permit or other construction activity permit approval. A separate application submission is required before issuance of permits by the City of Dover. 2) The applicant shall be aware that any future use of the existing structures may be subject to a separate permitting or licensing process through the City of Dover Licensing and Permitting Division. Certain types of uses also require a Public Occupancy Permit. If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person and the Planning Office as soon as possible. 63

Item 6. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: MARCH 31, 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Silver Linings Holding Corporation at 630 W. Division Street FILE #: Z-21-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Department of Public Works CONTACT PERSON: Sharon J. Duca, P.E. CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION 1. None. GENERAL 1. Our office has no objection to the rezoning of tax parcels ED-05-076.08-01-40.01-000. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GENERAL 1. None. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GENERAL 1. None. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED TO DISCUSS ANY OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS, PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE CONTACT PERSON AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. 64

Item 6. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: MARCH 26, 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Silver Linings Holding Corporation at 630 W Division St FILE #: Z-21-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Department of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PERSON: Jason A. Lyon, P.E., Director of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 CONTACT PHONE #: jlyon@dover.de.us T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER / WASTEWATER 1. Our office has no objection to the rezoning of tax parcels: ED-05-076.08-01-40.01-000. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES WATER / WASTEWATER / GENERAL 1. Should this site be redeveloped, which includes modifications to the use, the applicant / developer will be responsible for all costs associated with providing the appropriate meter / service / main to this site based upon the use including any necessary system upgrades or extensions. The appropriateness and adequacy of water and sewer services and meters will be assessed at that time. (Please note that each water meter registered with the City of Dover must have a separate service line.) Should the existing water and sanitary sewer services no longer be required based upon the proposed use, they must be properly abandoned at the mains in accordance with all City of Dover Water / Wastewater Handbook. 2. Any redevelopment shall adhere to the City of Dover Water / Wastewater Handbook. 3. Please note that renovations and or change of use projects must ensure that the water and wastewater service is brought up to current requirements. This may include relocating the water meter outside or changing service line sizes. Please ensure you schedule a meeting with the Department of Water & Wastewater during the planning phase for this site. Additional impact fees may apply for future development. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT WATER / WASTEWATER / GENERAL 1. None I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE . 65

Item 6. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: APRIL 7, 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Silver Linings Holding Corporation at 630 W. Division St FILE #: Z-21-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric Department CONTACT PERSON: Paul Waddell, Electric Director CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7072 CONTACT EMAIL #: pwaddell@dover.de.us T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC Our office has no objection to the rezoning of: ED-05-076.08-01-40.01-000 RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES ELECTRIC 1. Should this site be redeveloped, which includes modifications to the use, the applicant / developer will be responsible for all costs associated with providing the appropriate meter / service to this site based upon the use including any necessary system upgrades or extensions. The appropriateness and adequacy of electric and meters will be assessed at that time. 2. Any redevelopment shall adhere to the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. https://evogov.s3.amazonaws.com/media/27/media/13108.pdf. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT ELECTRIC 1. None. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE . 66

C F Z-21-03 Item 6. I I T R CITY OF DOVER Y E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE O M F A APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY R D.A.C. MEETING DATE: 04/07/21 D S O H V A E L R APPLICATION: Lands of Silver Linings Holding Corporation at 630 W Division St FILE #: Z-21-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. This office has no objections regarding the proposed rezoning. 2. The installation of natural gas and LP gas meters, regulators, valves, and LP gas bottles shall be protected from impact damage by impact protection. Natural gas and LP gas meters, regulators, and valves located inside structures shall have impact protection, except when located in separate protected utility rooms. Dimensions of bollards. Bollards shall be a minimum of six-inch diameter filled with concrete. The bollard shall be set into the ground at a depth of at least 36 inches (three ft.) embedded in concrete at a minimum of 18 inches surrounding the bollard. The bollards must be a least 48 inches (four ft.) in height above the finish grade elevation. Any deviation of the stated requirements must be approved by the fire marshal and/or chief building inspector. The above dimensions shall serve as the requirement for installation; however, the fire marshal and/or chief building inspector shall have the authority to require more stringent dimensions to fit the needs of devices warranting impact protection. Color of bollards. Bollards should be of the following colors; yellow, amber or orange. All colors shall be of fluorescent or have a reflective coating. Any deviation of the stated requirements must be approved by the fire marshal and/chief building inspector. (City of Dover Code of Ordinances, 46-4) 3. Every house, building or structure used or intended for use as living quarters or as a place for conducting business, and having any wall facing or abutting any public or private street or alley, shall have displayed on that wall, in legible, easily read characters which are of contrasting color 67

Item 6. to the background, the proper street number for such house, building, or structure in accordance with the following: One-family and two-family residential structures, height, the number shall measure a minimum of four inches in height, location, the number shall be placed on the house above or to the left or right of the front entrance, color, the number shall be contrasting to the background color, Arabic numerals, all numbers shall be Arabic numerals. Multiple-family dwellings, measurements, the number shall measure a minimum of six inches when identifying individual apartments with exterior doors, and 12 inches when identifying buildings with apartment complexes where there are two or more buildings not assigned street addresses. Individual buildings with street addresses shall have numbers measuring six inches, location, numbers shall be placed either in the center of the building or on the street end of the building so as to be visible from either the public or private street or from the parking lot, color, numbers shall be contrasting to the background color, Arabic numerals, all numbers used shall be Arabic numerals. Commercial, industrial and office buildings, height, the numbers shall measure a minimum of 12 inches in height, location generally, numbers shall be placed either in the center of the building or on the street end of the building so as to be visible from either the public or private street or from the parking lot, property line or driveway, should the building be located far enough from a public or private road so that the numbers are not clearly visible from the street, then the street address shall also be posted on the property at or near the property line or driveway to said building, color; each building, numbers shall be contrasting to the background color and shall be placed on each building in the complex, Arabic numerals, all numbers used shall be Arabic numerals, Shopping centers. Shopping centers consisting of two or more stores shall have a tenant or suite number affixed to the front of the tenant space and on the outside of the rear door which corresponds with that tenant space. Numbers shall measure six inches in height. (City of Dover Code of Ordinances, 98-344) 4. All required means of egress shall have an exit discharge consisting of a non-slip surface and leading to and terminating at a public way. 5. Project to be completed per approved Site Plan. 6. Full building and fire plan review is required if there is a change in occupancy classification or if renovations are proposed. 7. Separate building permits/plans submission will be required for each building and/or tenant fit out. If the permit submission is for a “shell” a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued. Separate plans and permits submissions will be required for each “tenant fit out” at which time a Certificate of Occupancy will be issued upon compliance/completion of each “tenant fit out”. 68

Item 6. Each “shell” will require a fire permit for sprinkler and fire alarm if applicable. Those systems (for the “shell”) must be accepted into service prior to any “tenant fit out” fire permits being issued. 8. Construction or renovations cannot be started until building plans are approved. 9. Fire alarm systems, fire suppression systems, hoods, exhaust ducts, and hood suppression systems require a fire permit from the Fire Marshal’s Office. This work cannot be started until the permit is approved. ADDITIONAL / SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS TO OBTAIN APPROVAL: 1. Proposed future occupancy classification is unknown. Once determined, additional comments may apply. 2. There was site work completed without proper approvals. Please obtain proper approvals and correct the site work (currently interferes with egress from the building, see item # 4 listed above). APPLICABLE CODES LISTED BELOW (NOT LIMITED TO): 2015 NFPA 1 Fire Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2015 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 13 Installation of Sprinkler Systems (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2009 IBC (International Building Code) Latest editions of all other NFPA Codes as defined by the Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations City of Dover Code of Ordinances *If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person listed. 69

Item 6. CITY OF DOVER D E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE L APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D O T =============================================================== APPLICATION: Silver Linings (630 W. Division Street) FILE#: Z-20-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT CONTACT PERSON: Joshua Schwartz PHONE#: 302-760-2768 =============================================================== THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: No person, firm, corporation or the like shall construct, open, reconstruct, maintain, modify or use any crossing or entrance onto a state-maintained highway, street or road, including any drainage modifications leading into or carried by the highway drainage system, without first having complied with standards and regulations adopted by the Department and having obtained a permit issued by the Department. Please contact the Delaware Department of Transportation - Development Coordination section to begin permit process. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: 1. No Objection to the Rezoning. 2. The developer should contact DelDOT to schedule a pre-submittal meeting. 3. It is expected a Record Plan and Entrance Plan Review will be required. 4. A cross-access easement should be established to a neighboring parcel. 5. DelDOT Project T201630003 is in front of the property. This project involves the design of a multi-use trail facility and or dedicated bike boulevard along the Rt. 8 corridor from US13 to a point near the new Dover High School. 70

KENT CONSERVATION DISTRICT Item 6. 1679 SOUTH DUPONT HIGHWAY • DOVER, DELAWARE 19901• (302) 608-5370 • WWW.KENTCD.ORG CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY April 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Silver Linings Holding Corporation at 630 W Division Street FILE #: Z-21-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: Kent Conservation District CONTACT PERSON: Kate Owens PHONE #: 302-608-5370 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: Source: 2019 Delaware Sediment and Stormwater Regulations CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: Kent Conservation District has no objection to the proposed rezoning of the above referenced site. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: Soil disturbance (e.g. clearing, grading, excavations, tree clearing, or stoning) equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet requires a Sediment and Stormwater Management Plan to be submitted and approved by the Kent Conversation District prior to the commencement of disturbance. 71

City of Dover Application No.: Z-21-03 Item 6. Department of Planning & Inspections IPM RG-1 M C-2A t est S NW C-3 ely S C-3 Ridg C-3 M t est SW C-2A St S t r IO ivis ion ton D WD Wes C-2A Site C-3 C-1A Fore st St C-1 C-1A IO RG-1 RG-1 C-3 Lincoln St Cherry St IO Davis Cir RG-1 C-3 RG-1 R-8 R-8 Tile: Lands of Silver Linings Holding Corp. Ordinance #: 2021-07 Addresses: 630 W. Division Street Legend « Parcel ID: ED-05-076.08-01-40.01-000 Subject Property Existing Zoning: C-3 Service Commercial Zone and COZ-1 Corridor Overlay Zone 2012 Buildings Proposed Zoning: C-2A Limited Central Commercial Zone Zoning COZ-1 Corridor Overlay Zone Owner: Tolando D. Anderson, Silver Linings Holding Corp. Dover Parcels Date: 03/11/2021 Corridor Overlay Zone 0 100 200 400 Feet 72

Item 6. REVISED REQUEST: No Equitable Owner Listed REVISED REQUEST: Limited Central Commercial Zone (C-2A) Corridor Overlay Zone (C0Z-1) REVISED REQUEST: To be Rezoned from C-3 to C-2A SUBMISSION PLAN SHEET REVISED FOR NEW REZONING APPLICATION 73

Item 7. City of Dover DATA SHEET FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN REVIEW ADDENDUM to DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT from MEETING OF October 7, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF April 19, 2021 Plan Title: Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property, S-20-10 Plan Type: Site Development Master Plan Plan Addendum: Revision to Phase 1 (dated March 25, 2021) Property Location: East side of South State Street in block between South Street and Scull Terrace Property Addresses: 605 South State Street, 625 South State Street, 100 Scull Terrace, and 150 Scull Terrace Tax Parcels: ED-05-077.13-01-49.00-000 and ED-05-077.13-01-51.00-000 Owner: Bayhealth Medical Center, Inc. KGH Development Corporation Present Zoning: IO (Institutional and Office Zone) SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone): Tier 1 & Tier 3 Existing Uses: Existing Buildings as Offices, Surgery Center, and Day Care Center with Parking Lots (227 existing parking spaces) Proposed Uses: Expansion of Parking Lots with removal of buildings: Phase 1 (Revised): Demolish Office Building (Gates Building) and various Maintenance Accessory Buildings; Proposal to Retain Scull Mansion Building for Period of 18 months; add 251 parking spaces Phase 2: Demolish Day Care Center Building; add 72 parking spaces Phase 3: Demolish Surgery Center Building; add 91 parking spaces and add connection to S. State Street at South Street intersection Site Area: 11.43 acres Waivers Requested: Partial Elimination of Curbing Elimination/Relocation of Bicycle Parking Elimination of Opaque Barrier Component For Consideration: Utilize Joint Parking Facilities provisions P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 74 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property (Revision of March 25, 2021) Addendum to DAC Report of October 7, 2020 APPLICATION: Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property: Master Plan (Revision of March 25, 2021) FILE #: S-20-10 1. APPLICATION STATUS Site Development Master Plan Application S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property began its application review in the Fall of 2020 and was scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission on October 19, 2020. By letter of October 16, 2020, the applicant requested that the Planning Commission to defer the Public Hearing and consideration of Application S-20-10 from the October 19, 2020 Meeting. The Planning Commission in adopting the Meeting Agenda in October 2020 acted to remove Application S-20-10 from consideration. Following this postponement, the Consideration and Public Hearing for Application S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property was to be rescheduled for a future Planning Commission meeting when the applicant sought to continue its review. The Application S-20-10 is required to be subject to Public Notice requirements for the Public Hearing on the new meeting date. The Applicant has made the request to return to the Planning Commission. 2. ADDENDUM – PLAN REVISION RECEIVED On March 25, 2021, the Planning Office received a Letter of Request to rejoin the Planning Commission review process for Site Development Master Plan S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property. The Letter of March 25, 2021 outlined a series of actions the applicant had taken including meetings with neighbors and interested parties. The submission Letter and attached Revised Plan Sheet C-201 outlined a series of revisions for the proposed project specifically related to Phase 1. See the Revised Plan Sheet C-201 and the original Plan Set submission of October 2020. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION - REVISED This Site Development Master Plan proposes three (3) phases of the project for the Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property. The subject area consists of 2 parcels of land including the following addresses: 605 S. State Street, 625 S. State Street, 100 Scull Terrace, and 150 Scull Terrace. Overall, the project involves the following (as Revised March 25, 2021): • Phase 1 (Revised): Demolition of the the previous Gates Residence, and three other structures (related to maintenance, etc.). The Scull Mansion Building is proposed to be retained for a period of Reconfiguration of existing parking lot layout and construction of 251 new parking spaces. Total of 478 Parking Spaces on site with three buildings. • Phase 2: Demolition of the Day Care Center Building. Construction of 72 new parking spaces. Total of 589 Parking Spaces on site with one building. 75

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property (Revision of March 25, 2021) Addendum to DAC Report of October 7, 2020 • Phase 3: Demolition of the Surgery Center Building. Construction of 91 parking spaces. Construction of connecting drive aisle to South State Street. Total of 680 Parking Spaces on site with no buildings. In general, the application (as Revised) proposes construction of several parking lot areas on the property after demolition of certain buildings located in the phase project area. The existing parking lot located around the Scull Mansion Building and to the west of Outpatient Surgery Center following demolition of four buildings will be expanded to the west and north. This extends to the north also encompassing the Gates House area following its demolition. The Scull Mansion Building is shown as retained in Phase 1; see Revised Plan Sheet C-201 dated March 25, 2021. The applicant notes that retaining the Scull Mansion Building will eliminate thirty-nine (39) parking places previously planned for this area. This Phase 1 Parking Lot will consist of 452 parking spaces with an additional 26 spaces remaining near the Day Care Center Building. The only access to the parking lot is from Scull Terrace during Phases 1 and 2. Phase 2 involves the demolition of the Day Care Center Building and construction of new parking spaces in its place. Phase 3 involves the demolition of the Surgery Center Building for the creation of addition parking spaces and construction of a connecting drive aisle to South State Street at the northern portion of the site (opposite South Street intersection). 4. PREVIOUS D.A.C. REVIEW REPORT The previous Development Advisory Committee (D.A.C.) Report and Comments dated October 7, 2020 are included for Application S-20-10. This Review Report and Comments is still valid when considering the Revised Submission and should be referenced for information on review of the overall Application S-20-10. The Applicant has only revised the project proposal for activities within Phase 1 of the Master Plan. The following Waiver Requests and Item for Consideration are to be acted upon with the Site Development Master Plan S-20-10 Revised. See D.A.C. Report for code explanations and copies of the Applicant’s request documents. • Waivers Requested: Partial Elimination of Curbing Elimination/Relocation of Bicycle Parking Elimination of Opaque Barrier Component • For Consideration: Utilize Joint Parking Facilities provisions The Review Comments and items offered by the Planning Office as identified in the D.A.C. dated October 7, 2020 under the following sections remain valid: • VII. CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS • VIII. RECOMMENDATION SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONAL OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES • IX. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT 76

Item 7. City of Dover DATA SHEET FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN REVIEW DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OF October 7, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF October 19, 2020 Plan Title: Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property, S-20-10 Plan Type: Site Development Master Plan Property Location: East side of South State Street in block between South Street and Scull Terrace Property Addresses: 605 South State Street, 625 South State Street, 100 Scull Terrace, and 150 Scull Terrace Tax Parcels: ED-05-077.13-01-49.00-000 and ED-05-077.13-01-51.00-000 Owner: Bayhealth Medical Center, Inc. KGH Development Corporation Present Zoning: IO (Institutional and Office Zone) SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone): Tier 1 & Tier 3 Existing Uses: Existing Buildings as Offices, Surgery Center, and Day Care Center with Parking Lots (227 existing parking spaces) Proposed Uses: Expansion of Parking Lots with removal of buildings Phase 1: Demolish Office Buildings (Scull Mansion and Gates Building) and various Maintenance Accessory Buildings; add 290 parking spaces Phase 2: Demolish Day Care Center Building; add 72 parking spaces Phase 3: Demolish Surgery Center Building; add 91 parking spaces and add connection to S. State Street at South Street intersection Site Area: 11.43 acres Waivers Requested: Partial Elimination of Curbing Elimination/Relocation of Bicycle Parking Elimination of Opaque Barrier Component For Consideration: Utilize Joint Parking Facilities provisions P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 77 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

City of Item 7. Dover Planning CITY OF DOVER Office DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D.A.C. MEETING DATE: October 7, 2020 APPLICATION: Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property: Master Plan FILE #: S-20-10 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Planning CONTACT PERSON: Dawn Melson-Williams, AICP PHONE #: (302) 736-7196 I. PLAN SUMMARY This Application is for Review of a proposed Site Development Master Plan to permit construction of 453 new parking spaces over the course of three phases for the Bayhealth Medical Center Campus. This Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion expands the existing parking from 227 spaces to a total of 680 parking spaces on the area collectively known as the Scull Property. Phase 1 proposes 290 parking spaces; Phase 2 proposes 72 new parking spaces and Phase 3 proposes an additional 91 parking spaces and a connection to S. State Street at the South Street intersection. The Plan shows the demolition of existing buildings in each phase for a total of seven (7) buildings demolished including the Scull Mansion to accommodate the increased volume of parking. In total the properties measure 11.43 acres +/- and are located on the east side of S. State Street in the block between South Street and Scull Terrace. The properties are zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and subject to the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone). The owners of record are Bayhealth Medical Center, Inc. and KGH Development Corp. The parcels are proposed to be consolidated before the project begins. Property Addresses: 605 S. State Street, 625 S. State Street, 100 Scull Terrace, and 150 Scull Terrace. Tax Parcel Numbers: ED-05-077.13-01-49.00-000 and ED-05-077.13-01-51.00- 000. Council District 2. Previous Applications Site Plan S-13-05 Lands of KGH Development Corp. The site was the subject of Site Plan S-13-05 Lands of KGH Development Corp. at 625 S. State Street: Parking Lot Construction in 2013. At its meeting of May 20, 2013 (after deferring action at their April 15, 2013 Meeting seeking additional information), the City of Dover Planning Commission granted conditional approval of the Site Plan S-13-05 for the expansion of the existing parking lot at 625 South State Street, known as the Scull Mansion property, to add one hundred-thirty (130) parking spaces. The action included approval of a Curbing Waiver and also added conditions to require elimination of certain parallel parking spaces along the Scull Terrace entrance drive. Also, with Site Plan S-13-05, the Planning Commission approved the use of the Joint Parking Facilities provisions of Zoning Ordinance, Article 6 §3.7. This allowed the parking to be viewed 78

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 2 on a facility-wide approach for the Bayhealth Medical Center properties where the parking lots may serve two or more establishments that are not located on the same parcel. The Commission accepted the information on employee count (for the parking calculation) and the Parking Exhibit Plan giving information existing parking facilities (as of 2013). The new spaces of the parking lot expansion developed under S-13-05 contribute toward the overall parking requirements for the Bayhealth Medical Center facilities. Master Plan S-06-14 Bayhealth Medical Center: A Master Plan was previously developed for the main campus area of the Bayhealth Medical Center at 640 South State Street. The project area for the Bayhealth Medical Center Master Plan consisted of multiple parcels of land located between South State Street and South Governors Avenue in the vicinity of South Street and Hope Street; it did not include this area on the east side of South State Street. However, the property was later included in a Unified Comprehensive Signage Plan for the Bayhealth Medical Center facilities (US-11-01). The Bayhealth Medical Center Kent Campus Master Plan (S-06-14) was approved in June 2006 with a one-year extension to the project in May 2007. Revisions to the Master Plan approved in September 2007 related to a Pedestrian & Utility Bridge over South Street rather than a tunnel as first proposed. The four phases of the Master Plan consisted of the following: • Phase 1: Central Services Building • Phase 2: Podium Building, Parking Garage, and Pedestrian & Utility Bridge • Phase 3: South Street Parking Lot improvements • Phase 4: Seven-story Bed Tower Building Addition and north Parking Garage After some revisions to the construction sequencing, the following phases have been completed: S-08-20 Phase 1- Podium Building and Parking Garage and S-08-42 Phase 2A – Central Services Building and Pedestrian & Utility Bridge. Administrative Site Plan review was completed in August 2009 for S-09-02 Phase 2B – South Street Parking Lot Improvements but not started. A proposed north Parking Garage (in Phase 4) was not built. Other History of Property Development The Scull Mansion (named after its 20th century owner), now utilized as an office building, was constructed circa 1864 by Manlove Hayes as a residence. The northernmost brick Cape Cod Style building constructed mid-20th century was previously a residential dwelling (Gates House) prior to being acquired by Bayhealth. The two easternmost buildings on the subject property were developed with Applications C-90-1 KGH Surgery Center & Diagnostic Center and C-90- 12 KGH Paramedic Training Center. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This Site Development Master Plan proposes three (3) phases of the project for the Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property. The subject area consists of 2 parcels of land including the following addresses: 605 S. State Street, 625 S. State Street, 100 Scull Terrace, and 150 Scull Terrace. Overall, the project involves the following: • Phase 1: Demolition of the Scull Mansion building, the previous Gates Residence, and three other structures (related to maintenance, etc.). Reconfiguration of existing parking lot layout and construction of 290 new parking spaces. Total of 517 Parking Spaces on site with two buildings. 79

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 3 • Phase 2: Demolition of the Day Care Center Building. Construction of 72 new parking spaces. Total of 589 Parking Spaces on site with one building. • Phase 3: Demolition of the Surgery Center Building. Construction of 91 parking spaces. Construction of connecting drive aisle to South State Street. Total of 680 Parking Spaces on site with no buildings. In general, the application proposes construction of several parking lot areas on the property after demolition of the buildings located in the phase project area. The existing parking lot located around the Scull Mansion Building and to the west of Outpatient Surgery Center following demolition of five buildings will be expanded to the west and north. This extends to the north also encompassing the Gates House area following its demolition. This Phase 1 Parking Lot will consist of 491 parking spaces with an additional 26 spaces remaining near the Day Care Center Building. The only access to the parking lot is from Scull Terrace during Phases 1 and 2. Phase 2 involves the demolition of the Day Care Center Building and construction of new parking spaces in its place. Phase 3 involves the demolition of the Surgery Center Building for the creation of addition parking spaces and construction of a connecting drive aisle to South State Street at the northern portion of the site (opposite South Street intersection). Located on this property, the two-story stucco clad building originally constructed as a mansion house now utilized as offices is proposed for demolition with this Parking Lot Expansion. The building is known as Greenwold (K-00126) and also known as the Manlove Hayes House (original owner) and Scull Mansion (20th century property owner). It is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.1 Manlove Hayes, a local businessman and state legislator, was also involved with the Delaware Railroad Company. Constructed circa 1863-1864, this house set on the edge of Dover in a pastoral setting; the house and its property included other outbuildings, a front carriage drive, and a planned landscape design. III. ZONING REVIEW IO Zoning District The subject properties are zoned IO (Institutional and Office Zone) and subject to the regulations of Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 Section 10 and Article 4 Section 4.15. The proposed use as off- street parking (a parking lot) is associated with the on-site medical building and Day Care Center (until their demolition) and the larger Bayhealth Medical Center campus located to the west of South State Street. SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) Portions of the site are located within the SWPOZ (Tier 3: Excellent Recharge Area and Tier 1: Secondary Wellhead Protection Area) found in Article 3 Section 29.7 of the Zoning Ordinance. However, this project site is within the Downtown Redevelopment Target Area which is exempted from the SWPOZ requirements and restrictions as per Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 §29.79 for the Tier 3 area. The area subject to the Tier 1 requirements does not appear to be located within the project area for the new parking lot expansions. 1 Greenwold (K-00126) also known as the Manlove Hayes House was listed on the National Register of Historic Places on March 20, 1973. This central hall plan residence is noted as being constructed by Richard D. Smithers and as having a landscape design planned by William Saunders. The property was also the subject of a series of photographs as HABS No. DE-198 in July 1982. 80

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 4 Site Development Master Plan The plan for this project is submitted for review under the Site Development Master Plan process (See Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 §2.44 listed below). This process allows for a series of construction phases to be outlined in a Master Plan for Planning Commission review and approval. Prior to each Phase of construction, a Site Plan specific to that phase is submitted for Administrative Site Plan review. Article 10 §2.44 Site development master plans. Conceptual site development master plans shall be reviewed by the planning commission in accordance with the provisions of subsection 2.43. Conceptual site development master plans shall depict a site development proposal that reflects general compliance with the provisions of the zoning ordinance and shall also reflect the following information on the plan: (A) Conceptual Master Plan. Conceptual Master Plan shall include the proposed general layout of building, streets, parking, open space, landscape concepts, and stormwater management areas. (1) Detailed site construction plans, details, and specifications are not required as part of a site development master plan submission. (2) The plan shall illustrate distinct phase boundaries for each proposed construction phase and shall depict proposed construction and site improvements planned for each phase. Bulk quantities and area totals for each construction phase, and for the total site, shall be tabulated in a data column on the plan. (3) Each construction phase shall be enumerated in sequential order on the site development master plan according to the order of construction contemplated by the plan. Phases shall be implemented in accordance with the approved site development master plan unless the city planner approves an alternate phasing. (4) Each construction phase represented on the master plan shall be planned and designed to function independent of construction and site improvements contemplated in future construction phases in all respects, including but not limited to bulk area provisions of the zoning district in which the site is located, off-street parking requirements, site entrances, emergency access requirements, site utilities, and stormwater management improvements except where the requirements and needs of a later phase are met and remain met by a previous phase of completed construction. (5) Any special agreements or conditions of approval relative to the overall development that have been specified by regulatory agencies shall be documented on the site development master plan. (B) Phased site plan approval. Individual phased components of the Conceptual Master Plan are to be reviewed and approved as an Administrative Site Plan. Final site construction plans, including detailed site grading, paving, utilities, stormwater management, and tree planting and preservation plans shall be submitted for final approval by the city planner and/or authorized designee, and to other agencies having jurisdiction, on a phase by phase basis in accordance with the approved site development master plan, and all regulations of the City of Dover governing the approval of site plans as set forth in subsection 2.4 and 2.5. IV. PARKING SUMMARY The parking requirements for a property in the IO zone is one parking space per 300 S.F. of floor area or one per employee, whichever is greater. A Day Care Center requires parking at a rate of one parking space per adult attendant and one parking space per ten (10) children. It is noted that the minimum off street parking requirement for the hospital use is based on one (1) space per every three (3) beds in the facility (Zoning Ordinance, Article 6 § 3.1). 81

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 5 Based on the size of the surgery center building totaling 10,800 S.F. results in a requirement of thirty-six (36) parking spaces for it. The current tally of attendants and children in the Day Care Center was not provided but from 2013 information the building required twenty-seven (27) parking spaces. The existing parking on the subject property serves these building and more. It appears that the Parking Lot Expansion is intended to serve the larger Bayhealth Medical Center campus. Consideration of Joint Facilities for Parking The Zoning Ordinance includes provisions for considerations of parking to jointly serve multiple establishments which could be considered for this property. Article 6 Section 3.7 Joint facilities. Required parking spaces, open or enclosed, may be provided in spaces designed to serve, jointly, two or more establishments, whether or not located on the same lot, provided that the number of required spaces in such joint facilities shall be not less than the total required for all such establishments. The applicant listed on the Plan a summary of the overall parking provided for the Bayhealth Medical Center properties. The plan lists a total of 1,601 parking spaces available for the campus and a total number of employees is 2,052 employees. The Scull Property existing and proposed by phases parking is given; however, the specific details of on-campus and off-campus parking locations are not provided. See Parking Summary – Bayhealth Medical Center Campus Chart on Plan Sheet C-001. Additionally, a submitted narrative titled “Parking Lot Expansion Necessity” describes the parking needs of the Bayhealth Kent Campus; see submission. Bayhealth Medical Center Campus Parking Summary: Previous projects implemented on the Bayhealth Medical Center campus included construction of a parking garage, new surface parking lots, and improvements to existing parking lots. With Site Plan S-13-05, a Parking Exhibit Plan (dated 4/2/2012) identified the locations of the campus buildings and associated parking facilities in order to utilize the provisions for joint facilities parking. The following table is provided as reference. Existing Parking Facilities at Bayhealth Medical Center Campus (from S-13-05 Plan) Location Address Number of Parking Spaces Scull Property 625 South State Street 227** Gates Property 605 South State Street 8** Bayhealth Hospital (main 640 South State Street 492 Total: building) 12 at Frear House 8 at front entrance 371 in Parking Garage 17 Emergency Room 84 Staff Parking Lot North of South Street Governors Avenue 483 Total: 26 at Office Building 56 at Central Service Building 401 South Street Parking Lot Hope Street Parking Lot Southeast corner of Hope Street 157 and South Governors Avenue Human Resources Office 600 South Governors Avenue 49 Medical Office Buildings 540 & 560 South Governors 184 Avenue ** Updated to current parking lot count at subject site as shown on S-20-10. 82

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 6 Loading Spaces Institutional buildings require loading spaces at rate of one space per 10,000 SF and one space per each additional 25,000 SF. The plan shows several loading spaces on the south side of the Surgery Center Building to satisfy this requirement (until building is demolished in Phase 3). Bicycle Parking Waiver Request: Elimination/Relocation of Bicycle Parking The project is required to provide bicycle parking. The bicycle parking calculation is one for every twenty parking spaces. Based on the total of 680 parking spaces ultimately on this parcel, thirty-four (34) bicycle parking spaces are required. Each phase would be required to satisfy the bicycle parking coinciding with the number of vehicle parking spaces. Existing bicycle parking spaces were not identified. A written Waiver Request was received for consideration by the Planning Commission to relocate the required bicycle parking from this Parking Lot Expansion project to the Bayhealth main campus at 640 S. State Street citing it as the destination of bicycle riders. However, details of the existing bicycle parking locations and format are provided in a photographic exhibit. See attached Waiver Request and Exhibit: Bayhealth Bicycle Racks. Waiver Request: Partial Elimination of Upright Curbing The upright curbing for parking lots and drive aisles is required per the requirements of Article 6 Section 3.6(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. This curb type appears to be utilized throughout the parking lot construction area with the exception of a segment of existing parking to remain and the future location of the Phase 3 connecting drive aisle. A written Waiver Request for the elimination of curbing was submitted to the Planning Office for consideration citing the reasons of the stormwater runoff. The City Planner can consider requests to eliminate curbing when there is a demonstrated need related to stormwater management. See attached Waiver Request. V. SITE CONSIDERATIONS This subject site includes area of significant topographic change. The northern portion of the property slopes towards a floodplain area (and culvert contained Meeting House Branch). Also, the property is higher than the adjacent roadways in certain areas. Adjacent to St. Jones River A portion of the property is adjacent to St. Jones for a section of its east property line. A setback of 100 feet from this water body is required for development. The proposed Parking Lot Expansion does not encroach in this area. Wetland Areas The property includes a wetland area in the northeast portion. Per the Zoning Ordinance, if the wetland area is over 0.25 acres in size then a 100-foot setback is required. The proposed Parking Lot Expansion does not encroach in this area. Special Flood Hazard Areas Portions of the northeastern and eastern boundary of the subject site are within the Special Flood Hazard Area (100-year floodplain/ 1% annual chance of flood). This information is shown on the FEMA FIRM Panel #10001C0169J effective date July 7, 2014. Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 83

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 7 §11.21 requires that flood hazard areas (100-year floodplain) remain as open natural areas with no impervious surfaces. Currently, these areas are predominately wooded areas and no site improvements are proposed in that area. Access The property is accessed by an entrance drive from South State Street. For addressing purposes, this entrance drive is named Scull Terrace. The entrance drive is shared with the Holy Cross Church and School Complex. This shared entrance drive was created in the late 1980’s and is referenced in an Easement Agreement dated January 30, 1987 (Deed Book 47 Page 63). Sidewalks The project site has an existing sidewalk along the South State Street frontage. A single sidewalk connects the parking lot to the corner at Scull Terrace. There are marked crosswalks across Scull Terrace and then a pedestrian crosswalk system (pedestrian activated warning lights system) across South State Street. Lighting The parking lot project does identify additional site lighting in the areas of the parking lot expansion as pole lights. The proposed lighting must be adequate to safely light all parking and pedestrian areas yet must be shielded and directed as to not create a nuisance on the adjacent properties. Scenic Resources The Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 §11.25 on environmental protections recognizes Scenic Resources and seeks consideration of them during the site development process. See excerpt below. Article 5 §11. Environmental protection 11.25 Scenic resources. Scenic resources shall consist of the following: mature woodlands and most especially the edges of wooded areas adjacent to open fields, wetlands or urbanized areas; other areas of mature natural vegetation such as marsh grasses; the historic district and areas listed on the National Register of Historic Places ; and freestanding historic buildings and sites and other buildings or districts of the city exhibiting particular architectural or visual merit buildings and places of special public or cultural significance, and significant views and v iew corridors to buildings or places of architectural, visual, public or cultural value and to attractive natural areas. Application for subdivision plan or site development plan approval shall include, as a part of the documentation of existing site conditions, the presence of and location of all scenic resources. The preservation and enhancement of the scenic resources potentially affected by the proposed development shall be considered by the planning commission in development review. As previously noted, the subject site includes the Scull Mansion Building which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The Scull Mansion building is currently labeled as “Two Story Stucco Building” on the plan. The Code calls for the Planning Commission to consider the “preservation and enhancement of the scenic resources” affected by the proposes development. The applicant submitted a narrative titled “Scenic, Historical, and Environmental Preservation.” VI. TREE PLANTING AND LANDSCAPE PLAN The submitted plan includes the Landscaping approach for the overall project. Zoning Ordinance, Article 5, Section 16.62 offers the option of the applicant defining a “Development 84

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 8 Area” within the overall property for the purpose of tree planting calculations. The applicant has established a “Development Area” for the project s shown on the Landscape Plan (Sheet L-101) as a dashed black line. With the tree planting requirement of one tree per 3,000 SF of Development Area, the Development Area is estimated to require 106 new trees. Some existing trees along South State Street will remain along with existing woodland areas in the eastern portions of the site. The Landscape Plan is providing a mixture of trees to provide a total of 122 new trees on the site. Mixed Planting of canopy trees, flowering trees, and evergreen trees are proposed within parking lot islands and medians and at the parking lot perimeter. Opaque Barrier Waiver Request: Elimination of Opaque Barrier Component Screening is required wherever a non-residential use abuts a residential use. This screening must consist of an opaque barrier (a fence, wall, or berm) at least six feet in height, accompanied by landscaping (Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 §7.2). This Opaque Barrier requirement applies to the northern property line adjacent to the residential properties which front Elm Terrace as they are zoned R-8 (One Family Residence Zone). The plan as submitted by the applicant does not indicate the placement of an opaque barrier component (fence, wall or berm). They are some areas of existing woodland and individual trees that may be utilized to comply with the landscaping component of the barrier. A written Waiver Request was submitted focus on the Opaque Barrier and Landscaping Requirement. Per Code, the landscaping component cannot be waived. VII. CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: The subject proposal has been reviewed for Code compliance, plan conformity, and completeness in accordance with this agency’s authority and area of expertise. The following items have been identified as elements which need to be addressed by the applicant: 1) The Master Plan must reflect any changes recommended by the Planning Commission. Add notes for any waivers or conditions acted upon by the Planning Commission. 2) Upright curbing shall be provided in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. A waiver may be granted by the City Planner if necessary, for stormwater management. An initial request was made with this Master Plan submission and additional specific area requests may also be identified with the Administrative Site Plan submissions for future phases. 3) Bicycle parking must be provided on the subject property unless a waiver for its relocation or reduction is granted by the Planning Commission. A Waiver Request was submitted for review including an Exhibit of the existing bicycle parking areas. If relocation of the bicycle parking is accepted, then the Administrative Site Plan must include details of the improvements of the bicycle parking location. 4) The property is subject to the requirements of the Opaque Barrier as this non-residential use is adjacent to residential uses on the north. A written Waiver Request was submitted; however, only the opaque barrier (fence, wall, or berm) component can be considered for elimination. The landscaping component of the barrier must be satisfied. 85

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 9 5) This application appears to seek to utilize the joint facilities parking provisions of Zoning Ordinance, Article 6 Section 3 for the subject site and the Bayhealth Medical Center campus. A narrative titled “Parking Lot Expansion Necessity” will information on the required parking for the hospital facilities and the existing parking conditions on the campus was provided. 6) A separate Record Plan sheet was submitted to show parcel consolidations, all right-of-way dedications, any easements, or other items affecting the property lines. 7) Sheet C-001: a) Indicate the location of zoning SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) Tier 3 and Tier 1 on the plan drawing. b) The required setback on the north property line is 30 feet. c) General Note #4: List Zone AE for property areas located in the floodplain. d) General Note #13: Add deed reference information on the easement regarding the shared entrance drive. e) General Note #16: Identify that these notations (1-3AB) are applicable to Site Plan S-13- 05 and may be superseded by this current review. This Master Plan submission is subject to a new and separate review by the Planning Commission. f) Show the 100-foot Waterbody Buffer from the St. Jones River. Update on all plan sheets. g) Clarify two floodplain lines on east side of site. h) Label north property line of 605 S. State Street to be removed. i) Clarify status of fence line from 605 S. State Street. j) List all involved addresses in Site Data Item #3 and in title block listing. 8) Confirm that sidewalk leading from parking lot and handicapped parking area to the Scull Terrace crossing meets accessibility requirements i.e. slope to allow those parking in this area to utilize the pedestrian crossing to the main campus. 9) Ensure accessibility ramps provided at intersections of sidewalks with parking and drive aisles. 10) Sheet C-101 – Existing Conditions Plan: a) Label location of Greenwold (K-00126) as listed on National Register of Historic Places. b) Check parking tally as drawing appears to show 222 parking spaces rather than 227. 11) Sheets C-201 Series: The following items are noted for correction or addition and should be provided on future Administrative Site Plan submissions. a) Add accessibility ramps to sidewalk crossing points just east of Holy Cross entrance from Scull Terrace. b) Show bicycle parking for remaining buildings. c) Add addresses to building drawing labels to help clarify locations. d) Identify the location of any traffic control signage for the parking lots and handicapped parking signage. e) Remove curb cuts not utilized along South State Street. f) Consider locations for additional connections from street frontage sidewalk to parking lot areas. 86

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 10 g) Add any protection measures necessary along parking lot edges adjacent to sleep slopes. h) Confirm number of parking spaces in segment of existing parking south of the Surgery Center. Restriping may be necessary. i) Add parking bumpers at the head of parking spaces lacking upright curbing. j) Show the location of project phase lines. k) Show location of existing Dumpsters that serve the remaining buildings on property in each Phase. Construction of Dumpster enclosures or other screening mechanisms may be required. 12) The Administrative Site Plans will need to show the location of existing utilities (water, sewer, stormwater, etc.) to remain. This information will be necessary to determine conflicts with proposed tree planting locations and other site improvements. 13) Construction details for items such as curbing, parking bumpers, traffic control signage, light fixtures, etc. will need to be provided as part of Administrative Site Plan submissions. 14) The following Landscape Plan information must be clarified for the Master Plan submission: a) The Development Area must be drawn per the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. The Area must compass the frontage to South State Street. b) Confirm Tree Preservation & Density Worksheet reflects the area and calculation data correctly. Update the tree planting calculations by identifying the size of the Development Area then its woodland and non-woodland area. The other areas of existing woodland to remain can also be listed. c) Indicate landscaping to comply with the Opaque Barrier components for barrier and landscaping. 15) The following information must be provided on future submissions as related to Landscape Plan in accordance with the plan requirements as listed in Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 §16.8: a) Information and tree planting calculations will need to be made by Phase. b) Provide list of existing trees to remain and check number of existing trees to be retained. Trees must be located on the subject parcels to be counted. c) Add line legend key for Development Area line or label as Development Area (rather than Landscape Project Area). d) Ensure tree planting locations and landscaping maintain the required spacing distances or access provisions from utility lines, fire hydrants, etc. e) Identify which existing trees will be removed versus preserved by showing placement location of the tree protection measures. Clarify on a plan drawing like the Existing Conditions Plan/ Demolition Plan. f) Clarify what surface (grass, stone or mulch) will be utilized for parking lot islands. 16) Evaluate any existing pavement conditions to remain. Improvements may be necessary to paving, parking bumpers, and curbing and pavement markings. 17) All signage must comply with Sign Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance and is subject to a separate Sign Permit Application. Signs are subject to a separate review and approval process in the City of Dover. 87

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 11 18) Any Erosion & Sediment Control Plans and Stormwater Management Plans granted approval by Kent Conservation District must reflect the Master Plan layout and design conditionally approved by the Planning Commission and be in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and technical review requirements of other agencies. VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: In accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 §2.2, the Planning Commission in considering and acting upon Site Development Plans may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards so that the public health, safety, and welfare, the comfort and convenience of the public in general, and the residents of the immediate neighborhood in particular shall be taken into consideration. These safeguards may to the maximum extent possible further the expressed intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the accomplishment of several objectives in particular listed in subsections 2.21 to 2.28. 1) Recommendation on Waiver Requests: a. Partial Elimination of Curbing – Staff grants approval of the waiver request to relax upright curbing requirements in select areas related to stormwater management where sheet flow of water into areas such as swales may be necessary. The locations of such eliminations of curbing may be refined during the design process for each phase. Parking bumpers are recommended at the head of all parking spaces where the upright curbing has been eliminated. This will be further evaluated with the Administrative Site Plan submissions as greater detail is provided for the stormwater management strategy. This must be carefully considered related to appropriate quality management due to proximity to floodplains, wetlands, the Meeting House Branch, and the St. Jones River. b. Elimination/Relocation of Bicycle Parking – Staff may be able to recommend approval of this request to relocate bicycle parking upon submission of details on the location and format of bicycle parking on the main building. However, staff recommends that bicycle parking continue and/or be made available during Phase 1 construction on the subject site to serve the existing Surgery Center and Day Care Center buildings. c. Elimination of Opaque Barrier Component: Staff recommends approval of the waiver to eliminate the Opaque Barrier Component of the fence, wall, or berm between this non residential use and the adjacent residential properties to the north. Staff agrees that the implementation of a fence, wall or berm would be difficult given the topography and presence of utility infrastructure in the northern area of the site. However, the landscaping component of the barrier is to be implemented. The existing woodland area can satisfy a portion of the landscaping requirement and then a design of a hedge or evergreen trees can be incorporated into the design to screen the remaining areas of the parking lot. The landscaping does not need to be located directly along the shared property line but can be planted adjacent to the parking lot area. 2) Vehicular and Pedestrian Connections: In accordance with Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 subsection 2.21 related to safety and convenience of vehicular, transit, bicycle, and 88

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 12 pedestrian traffic, Staff recommends the following related to vehicular and pedestrian access: a. Staff recommends an Analysis of the Scull Terrace and South State Street intersection and pedestrian crossing due to the substantial increase in number of users (both vehicular and pedestrian) with the implementation of the Phase 1 parking lot expansion. Improvements to this intersection and pedestrian crossing may be necessary due to increased volumes. b. Staff specifically recommends that the Analysis address the impact of increased volumes of vehicles utilizing the existing (and proposed) entrances, considering shift patterns and timing, background traffic volumes on South State Street, pedestrian crossings, adjacent uses, and potential stacking of turning vehicles entering and exiting the site at each phase of completion. c. The project should ensure it includes the required accessibility route and ramps from the parking lot and its handicapped parking over to the main campus. Appropriate pedestrian connections to other hospital facilities not located on the subject site is a key element in the consideration of this expanded parking lot to serve multiple hospital facilities under the provisions of the joint parking facilities. 3) Scenic Resources Consideration: Since the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, consideration of the preservation and or the effects of the development on the Scull Mansion are required and approaches to mitigation implemented. a. Staff recommends consideration of options for the adaptive use of the building and options for the redesign of the parking lot to retain the Scull Mansion building. There are a variety of Tax Credit Programs for Historic Properties that may be leveraged for rehabilitation & restoration activities. Other opportunities may include building relocation and architectural salvage of materials. b. If demolition of the building is unavoidable, then adequate recordation/documentation of the Scull Mansion is recommended to gather information on this historic resource. Documentation of the building would include photographs (exterior and interior), measured drawings, and information on the building’s construction in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior Standards and guidelines published by the State Historic Preservation Office for “Architectural Surveys in Delaware.” c. Staff recommends requiring mitigation measures such as the development an informational outreach items such as waysides on the history of the Scull Mansion property and building. 4) Stormwater Management: The plan provides limited information on the Parking Lot Expansion Projects’ strategy for stormwater management. There are known drainage issues in the general vicinity related to the Meeting House Branch (Tar Ditch). This project must not increase the drainage issues. It is recommended that cooperative participation occur and/or improvements be made to help resolving drainage issues. The City is involved in designing and implementing a Meeting House Branch Drainage/Stormwater Management Improvement Project involving the north area of this property. 5) Landscaping: Staff recommends consideration of installation of shrub/hedge planting along the South State Street side of western parking lot area as a screening for the vehicles in the parking lot. Consideration could also be given to utilize changes in site topography as a screening measure along the western side of the Phase 1 parking lot area. While not required by Code, this will help mitigate the effects of adding the parking lot to character of the area. 89

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 13 At the neighboring church property, a landscaped hedge screens the parking lot from the street. Other agencies may recommend additional conditions and safeguards in accordance with their areas of expertise. The Recommended Additional Considerations to Meet Code Objectives may be accepted or rejected by the Planning Commission. IX. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: 1) As the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (known as Greenwold and Manlove Hayes House), any projects involving federal funds are subject to the Section 106 process of the National Historic Preservation Act. The applicant has advised that federal funds are not involved in the project. 2) The Planning Commission should act upon any requests for waivers as part of any motion regarding this project application, or as a separate motion as necessary. Note: All waivers are at the discretion of the Planning Commission. 3) If major changes and revisions to the Site Master Plan occur in the finalization of the Plan, contact the Planning Office. Examples include reconfiguration of parking lots, relocation of site components like stormwater management areas, and changes in demolition plans. These changes may require resubmittal for review by the Development Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, or other agencies and commissions making recommendations in regard to the plan. 4) Construction will have an effect on the visitors to the site, adjacent property owners and nearby streets and site access. Any work requiring the closing or rerouting of owners or visitors shall be minimized and coordinated with the Planning Office and other City Staff as to offer the least amount of inconvenience. 5) The applicant/developer shall be aware that prior to any ground disturbing activities on the site the appropriate site inspections and permits are required. 6) Other agencies and departments which participate in the Development Advisory Committee may provide additional comments related to their areas of expertise and code requirements. 7) The applicant should be aware of the potential for historic archaeological resources which may include previous building locations, wells, privies, etc. on the property to the rear of the mansion house. The State Division of Historical & Cultural Affairs can provide technical assistance when dealing with archaeological resources including previous studies at the subject properties. 8) Following Planning Commission approval of the Site Development Master Plan, the Plan must be revised to document all conditions of approval from the Development Advisory Committee or as otherwise noted. This process involves submission of Check Prints in order to achieve Final Plan approval; the finalization of the Master Plan and the Site Plan for Phase 1 can be achieved together. Then the Site Plan of each construction phase/project area (Phases 2-3) must be submitted for Administrative Site Plan Review by the Planning Office 90

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property DAC Report of October 7, 2020 Page 14 and other agencies. Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 §2.44 (D) sets forth the construction timing in relation to approvals. Article 10 §2.44 (D) Expiration of planning commission approval. For projects which are reviewed and approved by the planning commission as conceptual master plans, approval of the conceptual master plan shall remain valid for a period not to exceed five years from the date of planning commission approval, provided that the authorized construction or use has commenced within two years of approval and is proceeding toward completion. In addition, the time between the completion of one phase and the initiation of the next phase shall not exceed a period of two years. 9) The applicant shall be aware that this Master Plan approval does not represent a Building Permit, Demolition Permit, and associated construction activity permits. An Administrative Building Permit will be utilized as a tracking mechanism for the site improvements of the parking lot. Demolition Permits are required to demolish any buildings. A separate application process is required for issuance of Permits from the City of Dover. 10) The applicant shall be aware that Master Plan approval does not represent a Sign Permit, nor does it convey permission to place any sign on the premises. Certain types of signage require a Sign Permit from the City of Dover prior to placement of any such sign; please consult with Planning Staff in regard to signage. If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible. 91

Item 7. CITY OF DOVER ELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 APPLICATION: Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property FILE #: S-20-10 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric Department CONTACT PERSON: Paul Waddell, Electric Director CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7072 CONTACT PHONE #: pwaddell@dover.de.us T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC 1. The roadway and curbing must be in. 2. The right-of-way must be within 6" of final grade. 3. The property corners must be staked. 4. Owner is responsible for locating all water, sewer, and storm sewer lines. 5. Owner is responsible for installing all conduits and equipment pads per the City of Dover Engineering Department specifications. 6. Owner is responsible for site and/or street lighting. 7. Meter locations will be determined by City of Dover Engineering Department. 8. Load sheets and AutoCAD compatible DXF or DWG diskettes of site plans, including driveways, are required prior to receiving approved electrical construction drawings. 9. Any relocation of existing electrical equipment will be engineered by the City of Dover Electric Department. Developer may be required to perform a quantity of the relocation. Any work performed by the City of Dover will be at the owner’s expense. 10. Prior to construction, owner is responsible for granting an easement to the City of Dover Electric Department. Easement forms will be furnished and prepared by the City of Dover Electric Engineering Department. 11. Fees will be assessed upon final site plans. The owner will be responsible for fees assessed prior to construction. Owner is required to sign off plans prepared by the Electric Department. 12. Must maintain 10' clearance around all electrical equipment, unless pre-approved by the City of Dover Electric Engineering Department. 92

Item 7. Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property File #: S-20-10 September 30, 2020 Page 2 of 2 13. Prior to the completion of any/all designs and estimates, the owner is responsible for providing the Electric Engineering Department with a physical address of the property. 14. All Engineering and design for Dover Electric will be engineered upon final approved plans. All Engineering work will be furnished by the City’s Electric Engineering Department. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES ELECTRIC 1. Owner must give the City of Dover Electric Department three (3) months’ notice prior to construction. Owner is responsible for following the requirements outlined in the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. The handbook is now available on the website at the following link: https://evogov.s3.amazonaws.com/media/27/media/13108.pdf. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT ELECTRIC 1. Provide load sheets as soon as possible for proper sizing of transformers and creation of primary fee estimates. Current load sheets can be found at the following link: https://www.cityofdover.com/media/Electric%20Department/COD%20Electric%20Load%20Sheet.pdf. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE . 93

Item 7. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 APPLICATION: Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property FILE #: S-20-10 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Department of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PERSON: Jason A. Lyon, P.E., Director of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 CONTACT PHONE #: jlyon@dover.de.us T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. All water utility components must meet the requirements of the Water Wastewater Handbook, effective date March 22, 2010. Please contact our office for more information. 2. The following notes must be added to the plans: a. Hydrant connections by the contractor are prohibited. This method may not be utilized during any phase of the project. b. Any existing water lines not to be utilized by the proposed facility must be properly abandoned at the mains in accordance with the City of Dover Department of Water & Wastewater specifications and requirements. c. The site contractor shall contact the City of Dover Department of Water & Wastewater Construction Manager at (302) 736- 7025 prior to the start of construction. A representative from the City of Dover Department of Water & Wastewater must observe and approve all City owned water and sanitary sewer interconnections and testing. All water taps must be performed by a City of Dover approved contractor. The proposed location for the water connection may need to be adjusted in the field due to conditions of the existing main. Possible conditions that would require tapping relocation include proximity to pipe joints, other taps, concrete encasements, conflict with other utilities, and the like. Test holes must be performed by the contractor to determine the best tapping location. The City of Dover will not be held responsible for field conditions requiring adjustment of the tapping location or for any work required by the contractor to make an appropriate and lawful connection. 3. Please indicate the water lines that will be abandoned during each phase of the project. WASTEWATER 1. All wastewater utility components must meet the requirements of the Water Wastewater Handbook, effective date March 22, 2010. Please contact our office for more information. 2. The following notes must be added to the plans: a. Any existing sanitary sewer lines not to be utilized by the proposed facility must be properly abandoned at the mains in accordance with the City of Dover Department of Water & Wastewater specifications and requirements. 94

Item 7. Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property File #: S-20-10 September 30, 2020 Page 2 of 2 b. Part II, Chapter 180, Article III, Section 180-10 of the Code of Kent County requires that “no person shall discharge or cause to be discharged any stormwater, surface water, uncontaminated groundwater, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, uncontaminated noncontact cooling water or unpolluted industrial process waters to any sanitary sewer”, this shall include condensate. Sec. 110-231 of the City of Dover Code defines storm sewer as “…any system used for conveying rain water, surface water, condensate, cooling water or similar liquid wastes, exclusive of sewage.” The contractor, developer, owner and designers shall ensure during construction that no illegal discharges to the sanitary sewer system are created with the site improvements. 3. Please indicate the wastewater lines that will be abandoned during each phase of the project. GENERAL 1. All existing utilities shall be adjusted to final grade in accordance with current City of Dover requirements and practices. This must be included as a note on the plan. 2. Please provide all recorded easements on the plans. 3. No trees may be planted within ten feet (10’) of utility infrastructure. 4. The final site plan must be submitted in the following compatible digital formats: a. AutoCAD 2018 (.dwg format). b. Adobe Reader (.pdf format). RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES WATER / WASTEWATER / GENERAL 1. None ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT WATER 1. The City of Dover water system is available to this site. The developer is responsible for all costs associated with extending and providing service to the proposed development. 2. Hydrant flow testing is currently only performed during the spring and fall. The applicant must call the Department of Water & Wastewater directly to schedule these tests. This applies to both existing hydrants as well as those proposed for the site. 3. Water impact fee credits are eligible for this project, in order to obtain the credits you must contact the Department of Water & Wastewater prior to the demolition. The credits will be provided for this parcel only. WASTEWATER 1. The City of Dover sanitary sewer system is available to this site. The developer is responsible for all costs associated with extending and providing service and capacity to the proposed development. 2. Wastewater impact fee credits are eligible for this project, in order to obtain the credits you must contact the Department of Water & Wastewater prior to the demolition. The credits will be provided for this parcel only. GENERAL 1. The applicant is advised that depending upon the size of the existing water service and sanitary sewer lateral to be abandoned, flowable fill may be required. 2. Construction plans will not be reviewed by our office unless all previous comments have been clearly addressed within the plan set and accordingly identified within an itemized response letter and with the Water/Wastewater Initial Plan Submission Checklist, which can be obtained from the following website: https://imageserv9.team- logic.com/mediaLibrary/198/WaterWastewaterHandbookFinal_1.pdf, page 88. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE . 95

Item 7. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 APPLICATION: Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property FILE #: S-20-10 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Public Works Department CONTACT PERSON: Sharon J. Duca, P.E. CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS STORMWATER 1. Final site plan approval will not be granted until a copy of the approved Stormwater/Erosion and Sediment Control Plan from Kent Conservation District is submitted to our office. 2. The size, length, slope, type and flow directions must be shown on all existing and proposed storm sewer lines. Rim and invert elevations must be labeled on all stormwater structures. No stormwater management infrastructure or set aside areas have been shown on the plans which are required. STREETS 1. Final site plan approval will not be granted until a copy of the entrance plan approval from DelDOT is submitted to our office. SANITATION 1. None. GENERAL 1. One paper copy of the final site plan must be submitted to our office for approval. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES STORMWATER 1. The City of Dover has completed design for a drainage improvement project for the Meetinghouse Branch which has been reviewed with Bayhealth and various State agencies. The intent of this project is to improve the stormwater capacity and quality for the area. Part of this project is to convert the existing storm sewer, running from S. State Street to the adjacent City property, to open channel flow. a. As part of the proposed lot consolidation plan, easements are to be provided on the plan including, but not limited to, drainage, utility and construction, to ensure existing utilities and proposed improvements are accommodated. b. Coordination must occur with our office to ensure that the grading of the parking lot expansion project will be able to accommodate the Meetinghouse Branch improvement project which will allow for the success of both projects. Documentation must be submitted to our office for review. 96

Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property Item 7. File #: S-20-10 September 30, 2020 Page 2 of 2 c. The design for the Meetinghouse Branch improvement project is based upon existing conditions. Design of the parking lot expansion project must consider the existing and proposed drainage capacity in the area. Documentation and calculations must be submitted to our office for review. STREETS 1. None. SANITATION 1. None. GENERAL 1. None. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT STORMWATER 1. None. STREETS 1. None. SANITATION 1. City of Dover solid waste collection services will need to be discontinued as part of the proposed plan. GENERAL 1. Construction plans will not be reviewed by our office unless all previous comments have been clearly addressed within the plan set and accordingly identified within an itemized response letter. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE . 97

C F S-20-10 Item 7. I I T R CITY OF DOVER Y E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE O M F A APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY R D.A.C. MEETING DATE: 09/30/20 D S O H V A E L R APPLICATION: Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property FILE #: S-20-10 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Project to be completed per approved Site Plan. ADDITIONAL / SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS TO OBTAIN APPROVAL: 1. Demolition permits required for the existing structures 2. During the phases, the existing buildings egress, perimeter access, and fire lanes need to remain in place. APPLICABLE CODES LISTED BELOW (NOT LIMITED TO): 2015 NFPA 1 Fire Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2015 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 13 Installation of Sprinkler Systems (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2009 IBC (International Building Code) Latest editions of all other NFPA Codes as defined by the Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations City of Dover Code of Ordinances *If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person listed. 98

Item 7. CITY OF DOVER D E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE L APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D O T =============================================================== APPLICATION: Bayhealth FILE#: S-20-10 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT CONTACT PERSON: Joshua Schwartz PHONE#: 302-760-2768 =============================================================== THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: No person, firm, corporation or the like shall construct, open, reconstruct, maintain, modify or use any crossing or entrance onto a state-maintained highway, street or road, including any drainage modifications leading into or carried by the highway drainage system, without first having complied with standards and regulations adopted by the Department and having obtained a permit issued by the Department. Please contact the Delaware Department of Transportation - Development Coordination section to begin permit process. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: 1. The developer shall schedule a meeting to discuss the plan. DelDOT previously approved a parking plan on July 24, 2014, However, it appears this plan is different. 99

Item 7. PARKING LOT EXPANSION NECESSITY The Bayhealth Kent Campus staff is in desperate need of additional parking. The current number of employees for Bayhealth exceeds 2,000; however, that number is increasing. The parking facilities of the hospital must be able to accommodate the shifts that require nearly 700 employees. Not only is the Bayhealth staff increasing, but the community that Bayhealth serves is growing as well, so parking is a key need for the facility. Bayhealth currently has a master plan to expand its parking facilities at the South Street location, which includes a parking garage. However, there is an existing flooding issue in the area that encompasses this lot. The City of Dover informed Bayhealth that the City will be fixing the drainage issue, and that design is underway. But until the flooding issue can be properly fixed, parking is still an issue. The flooding in this area has caused significant damage to property, vehicles, and created issues for the hospital. The proposed parking lot would free up space at the South Street lot for patients and visitors, while Bayhealth Staff park at the Scull Mansion lot. The South Street lot is close to the hospital entrance and is safely accessed by crossing South Street. As the need for outpatient procedures has increased, the demand for safe and accessible parking has also increased. The proposed parking lot expansion at Scull Mansion would allow for patients and visitors to use the parking lot at South Street while the Bayhealth staff would utilize in the Scull Mansion lot. Access to the hospital from the Scull Mansion lot is provided via the lighted pedestrian crossing that runs across State Street. Bayhealth staff will be trained to safely use this crossing. Keeping patients and visitors in the South Street lot prevents untrained individuals from attempting to use this crosswalk. This provides a much safer environment for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic on State Street. The lack of parking for Bayhealth facilities has been a long-standing issue. It has created unnecessary congestion for the public as well as Bayhealth staff and patients. This parking lot expansion not only benefits Bayhealth staff, it benefits every patient that seeks care at this facility. Parking can be safely provided for Bayhealth staff at the proposed facility while their patient base can safely access the hospital from the South Street lot. This eliminates the need for staff to park on the street and relieves congestion in this area. 100

Item 7. SCENIC, HISTORICAL, AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION Bayhealth Kent Campus Hospital is an integral part of the City of Dover community. Not only is Bayhealth the largest employer in the city, the hospital also provides a wide variety of services to the public. The proposed parking lot is an essential addition for Bayhealth, providing staff with parking for a shift. The proposed parking lot is located on the east side of State Street at Scull Terrace; properties owned by Bayhealth. This property is adjacent to the Jones River, contains woodlands and wetlands, and Scull Mansion. Bayhealth proposes to preserve the existing woodlands and wetlands that are on site. In addition, the improvements in this area are kept away from the Jones River, so as not to disturb the aquatic environment. The owner would also like to preserve Scull Mansion in a unique and memorable way. This project would require the demolition of Scull Mansion, a building listed on the National Register of Historic Places; however, is not in the City of Dover Historic District. Still, the project does not intend to demolish the history of Scull Mansion, a building which is now used as office space. Bayhealth would like to preserve the memory and history of the building in the form of a memorial which would be located in the parking lot itself, as well as in the hospital. This memorial would preserve the history of Scull Mansion through pictures, a written history, and artifacts from the building. The memorial would show the public everything about Scull Mansion in a timeless preservation located within the parking lot. In addition, another commemorative building component will be located within the hospital itself as a work of historical preservation. This would contain artifacts from Scull Mansion, a history of the building and owners, and specify the location of where the building once stood. The memory of Scull Mansion, as well as pieces from the building, will be preserved and displayed within the hospital for the community benefit. 101

Item 7. WAIVER REQUEST OPAQUE BARRIER AND LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT KGH DEVELOPMENT CORP. PARKING LOT EXPANSION FOR BAYHEALTH STAFF 2019184.07 REQUEST: Elimination of constructing opaque barrier and landscaping on a non-residential use when abutting a residential use. EXTENT OF THE REQUEST: The City of Dover Zoning Code, Article 5, Section 7.2 requires visual and sound screening be provided on a non- residential use when abutting a residential use. Screening shall consist of an opaque barrier at least six feet in height, accompanied by landscaping. The planning commission may waive this requirement for the opaque barrier in cases where noise is not a concern and the vegetation alone is considered a desirable aesthetic alternative. A waiver is requested to eliminate the construction of the opaque barrier and landscaping on the northern portion of the site. BASIS FOR REQUEST: The basis for this request is the existing area that significantly separates the site improvements from the adjacent residential zone. The site is not in the vicinity of the residential properties; there is a significant distance, ranging from 75’ – 400’, that separates the parking lot improvements from the residential properties. In addition, there is an existing ravine which is as tall as 17’ that significantly separates the parking lot from the residences both visually and from noise. Furthermore, the substantial separation area has an existing, dense tree line that is much taller than the 6’ minimum tree requirement of the City. The owner would like to preserve this wooded area as much as possible. Not only is the existing area densely wooded with a raised earthen ravine; the area is used extensively for utilities as well as by the City of Dover. There are existing overhead electric, major city storm drain, and major city sewer located in the area that run to the City of Dover Treatment 201918407am-Waiver-Opaque Barrier and Landscaping 102

Item 7. Plant. Erecting a fence would compromise the existing utilities and cause significant hinderance to access of the area. Additionally, this area is prone to flooding from State Street and the surrounding area. There is an existing ravine that causes stormwater runoff to flow from the residences into the separation area. There is another existing ravine that allows stormwater to flow from the parking lot area into the separation area. Both ravines flow directly into the low-lying area that separates the parking lot improvements and the residences. Erecting a fence on either side of this separation area would impede floodwater flow, causing additional flooding of the residential properties and parking lot area. Disturbing the area for fencing and landscaping would not only impede floodwaters, but could cause scour erosion which would impact the city’s existing infrastructure. For the reasons listed above, Becker Morgan Group is requesting a full waiver from Article 5, Section 7.2 of the City of Dover Zoning Code. 201918407am-Waiver-Opaque Barrier and Landscaping 103

Item 7. 104

Item 7. 105

Item 7. MAIN OUTPATIENT ENTRANCE REHAB DISCHARGE ED ENTRANCE OUTPATIENT PHYSICIAN ENTRANCE BAYHEALTH BIKE RACKS PARKING 106

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property EXHIBIT SET 1 – Public Comments Received Public Comments (received to date 10/9/2020) 1. Letter from Friends of Old Dover (Dover Historical Society) received 10/5/2020 2. Email from Nathan Attard on 10/9/2020 with attached copy of Letter sent to Terence Murphy, CEO Bayhealth. Letter includes with listing of Petitioners in support of Letter. 107

Item 7. 108

Item 7. From: Arnold, Nichole M To: Melson-Williams, Dawn Subject: FW: Letter regarding Bayhealth"s proposed demolition of the Scull Mansion Date: Friday, October 09, 2020 9:44:42 AM Attachments: Scull_Mansion_Letter.pdf Is this for you? From: Nathan Attard <nateattard@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 6:36 AM To: danielle_pro-hudson@bayhealth.org; pam_marecki@bayhealth.org Cc: Permits & Licenses <permitsandlicenses@dover.de.us> Subject: Letter regarding Bayhealth's proposed demolition of the Scull Mansion Ms Pro-Hudson and Ms. Marecki, My name is Nate Attard, I organized an online petition campaign asking Bayhealth to reconsider its decision to demolish the Scull Mansion. Attached is the letter that resulted from the campaign so far, which started on Sunday 10/04 and will continue until a final decision is made by the City. We have more than 100 signatories, including 27 Dover residents. I apologize for having to direct this letter to you, however the email of the CEO is not listed on the Bayhealth website. If you could kindly direct it to him, I would appreciate it. I can be contacted at this email and at the phone number below. Thank you, Nate Attard -- Nathan Attard nateattard@gmail.com 716.868.6594 (m) 109

Item 7. Terence Murphy CEO, Bayhealth 640 South State Street Dover, Delaware 19901 Dear Mr. Murphy, We the undersigned are aware of an upcoming meeting of the City of Dover Planning Commission on October 19, 2020. At this meeting, Bayhealth is seeking site plan approval for a proposal that will result in the demolition of a number of buildings, including the historic Scull Mansion, listed as Greenwold on the National Register of Historic Places. These buildings would be replaced by more than 450 parking spaces per a City of Dover agenda. Greenwold was constructed in 1863 by Manlove Hayes, a Kent County farmer, steamship line owner, clerk of the Delaware Senate and State Representative, who is credited with designing the house himself. The house is one of Dover's surviving Italianate stucco buildings, relatively rare in Dover due to the community's interest in the Colonial Revival style in the early to mid-20th Century, which would have seen many of these houses redesigned. Popularly referred to in Dover as the Scull Mansion, the house's listing on the Register was due to the initiative of Sarah Scull, occupant of the house until 1986, the widow of Dr. Carl Scull, who preceded her in death in 1950. Dr. and Mrs. Scull are buried in nearby Christ Church Cemetery. We appreciate Bayhealth's stewardship of this property until the year 2020. Bayhealth has found numerous acceptable uses for this house since it took ownership, and ideally these would continue. We ask that you continue in this stewardship role of this piece of Dover's history, or allow others the opportunity to do so through sale of the historic house, with requisite protection, such as a preservation easement, that will allow for its restoration. We are aware that the City of Dover has created no form of legal protection for this property or any properties outside its designated historic district, and technically this can take place without review by the Historic District Commission. We implore you as our community's hospital to please consider the good of the community in this action. Once lost, this piece of history cannot be replaced. Its removal will forever change the landscape of South State Street and erase the memories above that belong to it. Thank you. Nathan Attard, Dover (Petition Organizer) Mary Kathleen Bason, Dover Alex Griffin, Dover Elisabeth Vassas, Dover Kate Crossan, Dover Ruth Ann Piper, Dover Ellen Richardson, Dover* Sally Verma, Dover Teresa Pierce, Dover Robert Clemens, Dover Kathleen Spicer, Dover Kaitlyn Rose Staub, Dover Nathan Walston, Dover Theresa Staub, Dover Linda B. Capone, Dover James M. Staub, Dover 110

Item 7. Laura Bell-Burkett, Dover Jenny Mola, Frederica, DE Craig Burkett, Dover Lorraine J. Dion, Frederica, DE Cheri Knies, Dover Sarah Hohman, Georgetown, DE Anneke Cerri, Dover Lisa Maglione, Greenwood, DE Jeff Cerri, Dover Patty Murray, Hartly, De Patrick Weaver, Dover Nancy L Crowder, Historic New Castle, DE Erika Martine-Duquette Dover Susan Washinski, Houston, DE Jodie Wedel, Dover Jane Dean, Lincoln DE Adam Cerri, Dover Bruce Knotts, Magnolia, DE Gerald & Diane Strert, Dover Donna W. Josefowski, Magnolia, DE Jean Northwood, Dover William Lindewirth, Magnolia, DE The Hurst Family, Dover Heather Truitt, Magnolia, DE Cynthia Witt (Mrs. Charles L. Witt), Dover Carl Roosa, Magnolia. DE Hilary Welliver, Dover Yvonne Steele, Marydel , DE Brad Richardson, Dover Susan Kemer, Middletown, DE John Pancoast, Dover Ben Haigh, Middletown, DE Sen. Trey Paradee, Dover Sharlym N Ives, Middletown, DE Barbara Sheperson, Dover Stacy Calvert, Middletown, DE Bethany Geleskie, Dover Danny Jenkins, Middletown, DE Stephanie Twilley Seeman, Dover Jeff Kokoszka, Middletown, DE Georgeanna Windley, Dover Rosemary Connelly, Milford, DE Tim Shepperson, Dover Justin Stumpf, Newark, DE Tyler Capanna, Bear, DE Elle Sheaffer, Newark, DE Lois Hutson, Bellingham, WA (former Delaware Sharon Mitchell, Newark, DE resident) Nancy Willing, Newark, DE Bryan Hudson, Camden, DE Sherri Clark, Newark, DE Charles P. Ritchie, Camden, DE Jeff Pincin, Newark, DE John Riggins, Camden, DE Anne Groo, Newark, DE Susan Rigby, Camden, DE Ernie Mabrey, Philadelphia, PA Ann Martini, Camden, DE Janet Converse, Raymond, OH Crystal Beenick, Camden-Wyoming, DE Wendy Miller, Richfield Springs Georgia Kimball, Camden Wyoming, DE Dee Durham, Rockland, DE Ruth Anne Clarke, Chesapeake City, MD Jared Pibkerton, Seaford, DE Si Osborne, Chicago, IL** Cheryl Thaler, Seaford, DE Elaine Morris, Clayton, DE Gere Durkin, Smyrna, DE Daniel Mifflin Wilson, Cleveland, OH*** Caitlin Wright, Smyrna, DE Lynn Dilliplane, Delaware City, DE D Sue Hensley, Smyrna, DE John Martin, Delaware City, DE Leora Briggs Hansa, Smyrna, DE D Hansen, (not listed) Ashley Pelletier Smyrna, DE Alicia Gibson, Elkton, MD Kristina Coldiron, Townsend, DE Tina Husfelt, Ellendale, DE Steven Hubschmitt, Wilmington, DE Donald Adriance, Felton, DE Nancy Graybeal, Wilmington, DE Carol T, Felton, DE Sandra Messick, Wilmington, DE Michael Smith, Felton DE Steve Hubschmitt, Wilmington, DE 111

Item 7. Sarah Luca, Wilmington, DE Joyce Schurter, Wyoming, DE Carolyn Roland, Wilmington, DE Liza Giaccone, Wyoming, DE Michelle Jones, Wilmington, DE Jessica Besecker, Wyoming, DE Sarah Ottinger, Wyoming, DE Liz Dunn, (not listed) Notes provided to the petition organizer: *Ms. Richardson is the daughter-in-law of Becky Scull Richardson, who was the daughter of Dr. and Mrs. Scuill **Mr. Osborne is the grandson of Sarah Scull ***Mr. Wilson wrote “It was the home of my great great grandfather, Manlove Hayes. He lived there until his death in 1910, his daughter Anna Bell Hayes lived at Greenwald until she died in 1946. I lived there when I was born in 1943. Our family sold the Manlove Hayes house to Dr Scull in 1946, the heirs, Manlove Hayes Wilson, Ralph C Wilson, & Richard E Wilson (also known as grandsons of Manlove Hayes). We would hope City of Dover would preserve, as aside, where City Hall is now, where the Library is located, are both on the lands of Manlove Hayes. cc: City of Dover Planning Commission 112

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property EXHIBIT SET 2 – Public Comments Received Public Comments (received to date 10/19/2020 at 3:00pm) 1. Letter from Mayor Robin R. Christiansen dated October 15, 2020: Letter of Support to Planning Commission 2. Email from Karen Horton on 10/18/2020 • Previously EXHIBIT SET 1 – Public Comments Received thru 10/9/2020 was distributed as part of Planning Commission Meeting Packet. 113

Item 7. City of Dover OFFICE OF THE MAYOR October 15, 2020 Attention: Commissioners and City of Dover Planning Commission RE: Letter of Support to Planning Commission First of all, please let me express to you my deepest gratitude for your service to our City as Commissioners of the Planning Commission, particularly during this pandemic. Because of your efforts and those of the Planning Staff, the City continues to grow. Once again thank you. Having said that I am writing to you in support of Bayhealth and their proposed plan for expanded parking for staff and visitors alike. I must tell you that I have grave concerns about the demise of the Scull Mansion property. It is my sincere hope that a compromise may save this historic building and its charm. It is my sincere hope that some accommodation to preserve this elegant home can be formed. As Mayor of the City of Dover, I am charged with economic development which includes protection of existing jobs, revenues, the support of the expansion and retention of major entities, and the recruitment of new facilities of jobs. This plan does both and therefore I highly support the proposed project as presented. It is a map for future expansion of the workforce of Bayhealth and other jobs that will be generated in the public and retail sector. Also, the advent of this proposal will remove many of the current parking and transportation concerns, as well as, drainage issues in the area. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. Respectfully yours, Robin R. Christiansen Mayor City of Dover P.O. Box 475, Dover, DE 19903-0475 Community Excellence Through Quality Service 114

Item 7. From: Karen Horton To: CompPlan Subject: S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property Date: Sunday, October 18, 2020 8:44:19 PM Dear Planning Commission Members, My name is Karen Horton and I was born and raised right here in Dover. I am very much against the demolition of the Skull Mansion or the brick building just north of it. As a child growing up here, I remember trying to memorize all of the details of this beautiful mansion because it was such an elegant and graceful building - it made such an impression. Given the history of Skull mansion, how these two buildings contribute to what makes Dover special, and in particular how these two buildings contribute to how one enters downtown Dover coming from the south, there has to be another way than demolishing these buildings. There are communities across America wondering how they can create such a beautiful gateway to their downtown areas. Here we have such a stunning gateway with these two buildings and Bayhealth is even thinking of paving it? Please do not let this happen. Bayhealth has already torn down enough buildings, paved enough parking, and built a massive parking garage. I don’t care what kind of landscaping plan they have, this will alter Dover in a manner that cannot be fixed. This area of Dover cannot take anymore parking…. With all the craziness in the world, I cannot help but believe this is trying to be slipped through. I truly implore the Dover Planning Commission, and City leadership to come up with an alternative solution. Thank you for your consideration. Karen Horton Dover, DE 19904 115

Item 7. S-20-10 Bayhealth Staff Parking Lot Expansion at Scull Property EXHIBIT SET 3 – Correspondence Received Correspondence (received to date 4/9/2021) 1. Letter from Friends of Old Dover (Historical Society of Dover) to John Van Gorp, Bayhealth Medical Center dated January 5, 2021; Letter was copied to David Hugg, Director of Planning and Inspections 2. Letter from Friends of Old Dover to Bayhealth Board of Directors, Facilities Committee (Attn: John Van Gorp) dated March 19, 2021; Letter was copied to Planning Staff for the Planning Commission • Previously EXHIBIT SET 1 – Public Comments Received thru 10/9/2020 was distributed as part of Planning Commission Meeting Packet. • Previously EXHIBIT SET 2 – Public Comments Received thru 10/19/2020 at 3:00pm was distributed to the Planning Commission by email. 116

Item 7. March 25, 2021 David S. Hugg III City Planner City of Dover Planning & Inspections P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903-0475 RE: Bayhealth Medical Center BAYHEALTH KENT CAMPUS / SCULL PROPERTY SITE DEVELOPMENT Dover, Delaware 2019184.07 Dear Dave: I am writing as a follow-up to our telephone conversation this week concerning reactivating the review process for the above-referenced site plan on behalf of Bayhealth Medical Center. We are formally requesting the project be removed from the “table” and be scheduled for the April 19th, 2021 Planning Commission hearing. Since we requested to be tabled last year, Bayhealth has held a series of meetings with both neighbors and stakeholders. Specifically, we have had meetings with neighbors on Elm Terrace, Holy Cross Church, and a series of three (3) meetings with the Friends of Old Dover. We have listened to the various groups and have modified our plans to account for the feedback. Specifically, we are offering the following revisions: 1. We have removed the demolition of the Scull Mansion from Phase I of our project. The attached plan shows the modification to the parking area eliminating thirty-nine (39) total parking spaces to accommodate the building allowing it to remain. 2. We are willing to donate the building to the Friends of Old Dover to allow them to renovate, utilize, and relocate the structure. We will assist them in relocation of the structure and are willing to donate funds to them to facilitate a move. 3. We agree to keep the structure on site for a period of eighteen (18) months from the April hearing allowing the Friends of Old Dover time to raise money and organize a move of this structure, or otherwise develop a resolution acceptable to Bayhealth. If after the 18 months the structure has not been relocated or otherwise resolved, we reserve the right to seek demolition. 4. We will develop a landscape plan for the stie that exceeds the city code requirements and enhances the visual impact on the hospital and State Street. We have heard comments concerning the need to adequately screen the 117

Item 7. parking lot and we want the area to be a visually appealing. We will present a graphic of the plan at the Planning Commission meeting. 5. Our final phases of the master plan will be the demolition of the outpatient surgery center and the childcare facility located on the eastern side of the property. Bayhealth will not be removing those two (2) functions from operation and will relocate each likely on the main campus. We currently believe that relocation will be at least five (5) years away and could be longer. We look forward to appearing before the City of Dover Planning Commission in April. We will make a presentation to them outlining the various public outreach we have done and the changes to the plan. Sincerely, BECKER MORGAN GROUP, INC. Gregory V. Moore, P.E. Vice President GVM/rlh 201918407aq-ltr-DHugg.docx 118

24x36 24x36 Item 7. UE X LEGEND 24x36 FP 24x36 12 ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED X SANITARY GRAVITY SEWER LINE, EX. 10"S 10" S FP SIZE & FLOW DIRECTION FP 24x36 X 24x36 SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN, SIZE EX. 10" F.M. 12" F.M. 12 LANDS N/F FP & FLOW DIRECTION FP 18 U.T. RICHARD J. KOSIOR U.T. & KATHLEEN P. KOSIOR FP X SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (S.M.H.) T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7100-00001 DEED REF.: 5045-0067 P LANDS N/F 24x36 LANDS N/F F MICHAEL GRANT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 24x36 MATHEW PERZA ZONING - R8 X EX. 15"S 12 & RACHEL GRANT T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7101-00001 FP FP WATER MAIN & SIZE EX. 10" W 12" W DEED REF.: 8452-0199 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6500-00001 RCP EX. 48" DEED REF.: 9012-0298 FP ZONING - R8 F.H. F.H. ARCH I T E C TURE ZONING - R8 FIRE HYDRANT EX. 6"W X 24x36 24x36 EX. 15"S LANDS N/F WATER VALVE (W.V.) OR METER (W.M.) N 78° 25' 47 FP DENNIS J. GRIMM T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6400-00001 FP X W.M. W.V. W.M. W.V. ENG I NE E R I NG FCM " EEX. 48" RC DEED REF.: 5079-0078 LANDS N/F STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (S.D.M.H.) PFIP N 16° 12' Dover, DE 10" W 75.44' ZONING - R8 KATHLEEN M. UNTERKOFLER FP U.T. 12 24x36 EX. 15"S T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6300-00001 STORM DRAIN LINE (CMP OR RCP) X 24x36 FP FP DEED REF.: IS-0026-0405 LANDS N/F LISA MARIE ROSSI 309 S. Governors Ave. ZONING - R8 FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6200-00001 CATCH BASIN Dover, DE 19904 343.96' EX. 12"S X FP FIR FP DEED REF.: 7048-0014 ZONING - R8 Ph. 302.734.7950 FP UTILITY POLE W/ OVERHEAD SERVICE 24x36 S (TELEPHONE X X OR ELECTRIC OR BOTH) FP Fax 302.734.7965 24x36 18 17 68 FP V V V X X X U.T. 16 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE °0 EX. 15 FP X 48.98' 15 FP X X UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC U.E. U.E. Salisbury, MD 26.45' 14 "S FH 18 X FP EX 6' FP V V FP X X X FP . 4 33 FP FP UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE U.T. U.T. 312 West Main St. Suite 300 24x36 8" "E FP FP 24x36 FP RC FP Salisbury, MD 21801 SCM . W.V 12 P V FP V FP EX. 15"S X UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN EX. 2" G 2" G OE FIR FP FP N/A Ph. 410.546.9100 OE OE PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED 188 OE OE X Fax 410.546.5824 1 OE OE 24x36 112 OE OE OE OE OE OE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 24x36 2 V OE OE OE OE OE Wilmington, NC LANDS N/F OE OE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SLAB / PAVING 13 FP MOLLY B. PHILLIPS X FP . EX. 8"S APPROXIMATE LOCATION T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6100-00001 FP 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 W.V 11 V 12 IMPERVIOUS SURFACED ROAD, DRIVE W.V W 24" 24" 30" 14 12 OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 7. DEED REF.: 7372-0173 ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F OR LOT FP Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 24x36 EX. 8"W . 13 16 X FP 24x36 .V. W.V 15 24" 14 FP ' DONALD L. HENRY Ph. 910.341.7600 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6000-00001 INDIVIDUAL TREE OR BUSH N/A UT . UT 15 FP V DEED REF.: 5775-0149 EVERGREEN DECIDUOUS Fax 910.341.7506 16 36" 16 N 87 ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F X WIRE FENCE X X X X X X V ° 59' GIA DOWNTOWN FP www.beckermorgan.com FP 32" E FP 17 18 19 V PROPERTIES, LLC CHAINLINK FENCE 24x36 19 17 24x36 96" FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-5901-00001 X STOCKADE FENCE DEED REF.: 8444-0331 OE 18 FP V ZONING - R8 5 19 FP V FP STRUCTURE (CONCRETE, WOOD, FP 152. METAL, ETC.) 24x36 U.T. 09' X FP 24x36 EX. 12"S U.T. FP V N 77° 42' 04" 20 20 E DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE V V 50.03' EMBANKMENT SIDESLOPES (DOWN) RADIUS: 1462.69' 21 24x36 ARC LENGTH: 284.55' V S 15° 02' 25" E X 24x36 V FP CONTOUR 49 55 CHORD BEARING: N 10° 37' 47" W 48" 21 V 7.58' FP 22 FP Xref-Phase-1-Parking-Blk 43.55 25.50 T.C. .90' V ELEVATION SPOT SHOT CHORD LENGTH: 284.10' 25.15 108 47" W 20 25.00 B.C. 23 BENCH MARK 34' X N/A 18' 18' 24' 18' 52° 24x36 24x36 22 PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 48" 24" S 10 AC 23 X FP CENTERLINE FP 24 FP 24 5 ' LIGHT POLE FP 74.9 24x36 25 X 24x36 18 9 CONSTRUCTION NOTE N/A .85' EX. 18"S 26 48" 15' REAR YARD FP 183 10 1 21 X FP 25 TWO STORY 27 1 2 SETBACK LINE FP S 15° 02' 25" E 24x36 1 FP 24x36 BRICK BUILDING 13 4 FP X 2,743 SQ. FT. 1 5 LANDS N/F 1 6 RADIUS: 1462.69' 1 CITY OF DOVER X 22 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5700-00001 24x36 ARC LENGTH: 462.51' 10 17 8 DEED REF.: 5011-0121 24x36 CHORD BEARING: N 7° 08' 39" W 1 9 FP 26 1 ZONING - IO CHORD LENGTH: 460.59' 48" FP X 20 1 FP PROPOSED 2 2 24x36 "S AC 2 APPROXIMATE LOCATION X LANDS N/F 24x36 70.00' CONCRETE CURB (typ.) 23 . OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN CITY OF DOVER EX. 12 23 60" ONE STORY 24 25 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5000-00001 27 FRAME BUILDING 26 27 N 74° 57' 34" E FP X DEED REF.: T-0036-0203 ZONING - IO N 24x36 28 1,112 SQ. FT. 170.01' FP 24x36 71.52' S 15° 02' 25" E 10 34 98.49' V X 28 24x36 24 10 FP V X 24x36 V FP 24" 28 FP V X PHASE 1 PARKING ADDITION PROPOSED PARKING PROPERTY LINE TO BE 29 LIGHT FIXTURE (typ.) EXTINGUISHED PER THE 24x36 139,815 S.F. / 15,535 S.Y. V FP 24x36 FP V 25 29 CONSOLIDATION PLAN X 60" 25 30" 9' 26 18' FP X 20' FRONT YARD 80.00' 27 30' 36OE 21 24x36 24x36 30 9 SETBACK LINE 30" OE OE X X X OE 10 X PROJECT TITLE 36" 28 24" 18' 265 11 24x36 RADIUS: 1462.69' ARC LENGTH: 177.96' 3 0" 29 31 31 ONE STORY POLE BUILDING 2 4 2 245 12 13 14 15 S8 X 7° 2 9' 2 X 2" E BAYHEALTH 24x36 26 CHORD BEARING: N 1° 34' 16" W 24' 255 294 1,440 SQ. FT. 197 26 2 16 N 73° 01' 53" E 17 X X 78.4 MEDICAL TE CHORD LENGTH: 177.86' 18 28.34' 8' X 24x36 30" 40' 10 30 15 19 20 21 S 74 X °5 CENTER, INC 24x36 STR W.V . 18' 22 0' X 23 58 . W.M 31 38 34 24' . 6" S " X E SCULL PROPERTY 24x36 EX 24x36 18' 24 SITE DEVELOPMENT EET X TWO STORY 26 KCR OT W 20 X FRAME BUILDING 1,044 SQ. FT. 25 EX. 6"S X FP MASTER PLAN 24x36 PROPOSED PROPOSED 24 3 24x36 24' 2 25 X FP BAYHEALTH STAFF 25, IDE R 32 CONCRETE CURB (typ.) EX. 6"S CONCRETE CURB (typ.) 23 4 30 29 2 X 24' 32 31 28 X PARKING LOT STA 25 FP FP 9' 27 MIN IG 24x36 27 18' 12" STEEL - MD - 7.13' 26 X EXPANSION 24x36 OR HT O 4" PVC - MD - 2.01' EX. 30" F.M. 26 FP 26 42 34 X 18 26 8" PVC - MD - 5.84' 8" PVC - MD - 5.55' 3.8 605 S. STATE STREET X 8' FP 18' ART F W 24x36 4" PVC - MD - 1.66' 4" PVC - MD - 1.70' 4" PVC - MD - 2.34' 8" PVC - MD - 3.84' X FP CITY OF DOVER 24x36 8" PVC - MD - 3.53' KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE SOU 30" 28 9 33 FP ERI A FP AL Y X TWO STORY SHEET TITLE 2"S PROPOSED PARKING 24' PORCH S 34 STUCCO BUILDING TH 24x36 EX. 34 24x36 LIGHT FIXTURE (typ.) 2,100 SQ. FT. G.M. 1 60 X ° 35 SITE PLAN FO 17 26 FP X PHASE 1 EX. 18"S ' 27" 24x36 24x36 .P. EXISTING ONE-STORY R.C 24" .88' 21 44 33 32 COVERED ENTRANCE BRICK BUILDING E X 31 OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER 24x36 EX. 184 30 17 10,800 S.F. ± - FOOTPRINT 26 FP X TOTAL PARKING 24x36 15' REAR YARD PROPOSED 27" 29 28 PHASE 1 EXISTING PARKING 27 26 SETBACK LINE X SPACES: 478 24x36 ACCESSIBLE RAMP (typ.) TO BE REPAVED GEN 24x36 28 14 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES (2 VAN) 36,261 S.F. / 4,029 S.Y. W.M. W.V. FP X ORIGIANL WITHOUT HOUSE: 517 W.M. 27 X 32 10 9 17 24x36 32 32 AC 24x36 33 60" 33 27 X 29 FP 0 20 40 80 32 W.V. AC 31 28 W.V. X 24x36 PROPOSED 30 27 D. 3 ONE STORY FRAME 24x36 E 30 31 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 29 17 BUILDING 176 X Do Not Explode - Select Scale 34" 28 F.H. W.V. 5,044 SQ. FT. FP .50' SCALE: 1" = 40' 24x36 34' 32 AC X 24x36 27 F.M. EX. 24" R.C.P. N 1° SCULL TERRACE 33 34 33 32 27 26 EX. 30" 26 X N 78° 28' 32 X E ISSUE BLOCK FP X "E 24x36 10' SIDE YARD FLOODPLAIN LINE 24x36 25.33' 37.87' OE OE OE SETBACK LINE . OE OE 12 OE 26 18 23 S 11° 54' 41" W.M . F.H OE OE 24x36 OE OE OE 24x36 W.V . FCM 18" FCM 121.55' FP 24" . W.V W.V . 1115.96' 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 S 72° 59' 55" W 10"S X 29 .P. 15 0 15 EX. R.C 30 30 24x36 45 45 24x36 60 60 75 90 75 90 X 24" 75 60 75 60 45 45 30 30 EX. 15 0 15 FP 12 20' WIDE KENT COUNTY X LANDS N/F UTILITY EASEMENT 1 03/25/21 REVISED PHASE 1 - THE EXISTING TO REMAIN - PARKING REDUCED BY 39. 8"S 24x36 30 OE CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS, DOVER, DELAWARE EX. 24x36 X MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 30 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5600-00001 12 1 LAYER STATE: C-201 DEED REF.: Q-0020-0165 X ZONING - IO X X X FP PROJECT NO.: 2019184-07 24x36 30 X 24x36 EX. 12" 30 29 X DATE: 2021-03-25 R.C .P 28 12 X . 27 X SCALE: AS SHOWN 20' 24x36 FP DRAWN BY: M.A.R. PROJ. MGR.: M.A.R. 24x36 X 12 X SHEET OE X 20' WIDE CITY OF DOVE 24x36 24" 12 UTILITY EASEMENT R X FP C-201 COPYRIGHT 2020 24x36 119 C-201 - BayHealth Scull Property - Phase 1 Revised - 2021-03-25 24x36 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2019\2019184-07\DWG\201918407-Site-C3d18-DAC.dwg, Mar 25, 2021 - 9:56am 24x36

24x36 24x36 Item 7. WWW.beckermorgan.com LANDS N/F FP E X RAC RICHARD J. KOSIOR 24x36 & KATHLEEN P. KOSIOR T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7100-00001 FP FP ELM TER 24x36 DEED REF.: 5045-0067 LANDS N/F LANDS N/F MICHAEL GRANT X MATHEW PERZA ZONING - R8 & RACHEL GRANT EET T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7101-00001 FP N N STR DEED REF.: 8452-0199 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6500-00001 FP ZONING - R8 DEED REF.: 9012-0298 ER 24x36 ZONING - R8 FP WAT 24x36 LANDS N/F X N 78° 25' 47 DENNIS J. GRIMM FCM "E FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6400-00001 DEED REF.: 5079-0078 LANDS N/F 605 S. STATE ST. N 16° 12' 10" W 75.44' . H ST FIP ZONING - R8 X KATHLEEN M. UNTERKOFLER 2-05-07713-01-4900-00001 T SOU T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6300-00001 24x36 FP DEED REF.: IS-0026-0405 LANDS N/F 3.45 AC. 24x36 FP ZONING - R8 LISA MARIE ROSSI SITE FP 343.96' T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6200-00001 X LIMITS OF PHASE 10'3SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE FP FP F DEED REF.: 7048-0014 SP FIR ZONING - R8 68 X X TOTAL: 11.43 AC.± ARCH I T E C TURE PARKING ADDITION V X ° 48.98' SITE B ECKER M ORGAN G ROUP ARCHITECTURE - ENGINEERING DOVER, DE SALISBURY, MD WILMINGTON, NC V X 26.45' FP X 06 FP FP X 24x36 24x36 V V X X FP 150 SCULL TERRACE '3 FP FP X FP 2-05-07713-01-5100-00001 ENG I NE E R I NG 3" SOUTH GOVERN FP 7.98 AC. Y FP SOUTH STATE STREET SCM FP FIP E FP HWA FP Dover, DE X FIR V VFP FP SOUTH STATE STREET HIG ORS AVENUE 24x36 24x36 X 309 S. Governors Ave. V LANDS N/F MOLLY B. PHILLIPS FP NT Dover, DE 19904 APPROXIMATE LOCATION 12 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6100-00001 FP UPO Ph. 302.734.7950 FP OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 7. DEED REF.: 7372-0173 X 24x36 24" 24" 30" 16 ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F DONALD L. HENRY FP Fax 302.734.7965 24x36 SOU 24" FP V ' T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6000-00001 N 87 ° 59' DEED REF.: 5775-0149 LANDS N/F X TH Salisbury, MD D 36" FP ZONING - R8 V 32" E GIA DOWNTOWN FP FP 24x36 96" V PROPERTIES, LLC T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-5901-00001 312 West Main St. Suite 300 24x36 FP Salisbury, MD 21801 X DEED REF.: 8444-0331 HOPE ST. 5 ZONING - R8 FP FIP V Ph. 410.546.9100 FP 152. CITY OF DOVER - KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE FP 09' Fax 410.546.5824 V N 77° 42' 04" LOCATION MAP VICINITY MAP X FP V E FP SCALE: 1" = 400' SCALE: 1" = 1000' Wilmington, NC 24x36 LANDS OF 24x36 RADIUS: 1462.69' 50.03' BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, INC V S 15° 02' 25" E 2019184-07-V-Map-400 2019184-07-V-Map-1000 ARC LENGTH: 284.55' V 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 X 7.58' CHORD BEARING: N 10° 37' 47" W V SITE DATA - SCULL MANSION PROPERTY 48" TOTAL AREA: 11.43 ACRES± FP Xref-Phase-1-Parking-Blk FCM .90' V Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 CHORD LENGTH: 284.10' 108 47" W Xref-Phase-2-Parking-Blk 2019-184-Site-Data-001 Ph. 910.341.7600 24x36 24x36 Xref-Phase-3-Parking-Blk 34' FP FP 1. OWNER OF RECORD: BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, INC 52° X Fax 910.341.7506 48" 10 24" S C/O MIKE METZING VP, CORPORATE SUPPORT SERVICES 640 SOUTH STATE STREET www.beckermorgan.com 5' X DOVER, DE 19901 74.9 FP 24x36 24x36 FP 18 9 .85' 2. ENGINEER / SURVEYOR: BECKER MORGAN GROUP INC. 15' REAR YARD 183 X FP 48" FP 309 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVE. SETBACK LINE 70.00' S 15° 02' 25" E FP TWO STORY FP DOVER, DELAWARE 19904 24x36 BRICK 302-734-7950 24x36 X BUILDING 2,743 SQ. FT. LANDS N/F RADIUS: 1462.69' CITY OF DOVER 3. PROPERTY LOCATION: 150 SCULL TERRACE & 605 S. STATE ST. T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5700-00001 LIMITS OF PHASE 1 ARC LENGTH: 462.51' 10 6 DEED REF.: 5011-0121 X DOVER, DE 19901 FP CHORD BEARING: N 7° 08' 39" W ZONING - IO FP PARKING ADDITION 4. TAX PARCEL NUMBERS: 2-05-07713-01-4900-00001 605 S. STATE ST. 3.45 AC. 24x36 24x36 CHORD LENGTH: 460.59' 48" X (PARCELS TO BE CONSOLIDATED) 2-05-07713-01-5100-00001 150 SCULL TERRACE 7.98 AC. APPROXIMATE LOCATION LANDS N/F OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN FP CITY OF DOVER 5. ZONING CLASSIFICATION: IO - INSTITUTIONAL AND OFFICE (CITY OF DOVER) 60" ONE STORY X T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5000-00001 SWPOZ TIER 1 AND 3 - SOURCE WATER PROTECTION OVERLAY ZONE FRAME N 74° 57' 34" E 24x36 24x36 FP DEED REF.: T-0036-0203 BUILDING 1,112 SQ. FT. 170.01' ZONING - IO 6. DEED REFERENCE: D-657-20 & S-39-127 S 15° 02' 25" E 71.52' 10 34 98.49' X V 7. SITE AREA (AFTER CONSOLIDATION): 11.43 ACRES 24x36 10 FP X 8. SETBACKS: IO - INSTITUTIONAL AND OFFICE 24x36 V FP 24" V STREET YARD: 10 FEET PROPERTY LINE TO BE SIDE YARD: 10 FEET EXTINGUISHED PER THE FP V X REAR YARD: 15 FEET FP 24x36 CONSOLIDATION PLAN V SIDE/REAR ADJOINING "R" ZONES: 30 FEET 24x36 60" 30" FP 9. BULK STANDARDS: IO - INSTITUTIONAL AND OFFICE X 20' FRONT YARD FIP MINIMUM AREA: 10,000 SQ. FT. 80.00' SETBACK LINE 30" X X 36 21 X MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 100 FEET 36" 24" 24x36 24x36 S8 MINIMUM DEPTH: 100 FEET RADIUS: 1462.69' 30" ONE STORY 7° 2 BUILDING HEIGHT: 150 FEET/10 STORIES POLE X 9' 2 290 294 197 ARC LENGTH: 177.96' X 2" E FLOOR AREA RATIO: 6.0 CHORD BEARING: N 1° 34' 16" W BUILDING 1,440 SQ. FT. N 73° 01' 53" E X 78.4 MAX LOT COVERAGE: 85% 28.34' 8' CHORD LENGTH: 177.86' EET 24x36 X 24x36 30 S 10. USE: EXISTING: MEDICAL FACILITY 74 " 10 °5 X PROPOSED:MEDICAL FACILITY 0' 58 11. ROAD CLASSIFICATION: SOUTH STATE STREET - MINOR ARTERIAL - 25 MPH STR 38 34 "E X 24x36 24x36 X 12. PROPERTY LOCATION: LATITUDE: N 39° 09' 13.08" GRS80 - NAD83 (2011) LIMITS OF PHASE 3LIMITS OF PHASE 2 TWO STORY LONGITUDE: W 075° 31' 23.25" GRS80 - NAD83 (2011) 60 FRAME BUILDING X 1,044 SQ. FT. PARKING ADDITION PARKING ADDITION FP 13. SURVEY DATUM: NGS MONUMENTS FO X TE VERTICAL: NAVD 88 - XX 24x36 24x36 KCR OT W X FP HORIZONTAL: NAD 83 (2011) DSP - XX X STA 14. SURVEY UNIT: LINEAR: US SURVEY FOOT 25, IDE R X FP 18 ANGULAR: DEGREES MINUTES SECONDS (DMS) 42 34 3.8 FP 24x36 24x36 X COORDINATE TYPE: GROUND 8' FP 19 13 MIN I OR GHT O X 15. MONUMENTATION: 8 FOUND / 7 SET 9 FP TH 30" 184 16. SURVEY CLASSIFICATION: SUBURBAN SURVEY TWO STORY 24x36 24x36 S 34 PROJECT TITLE ART F W FP .88' STUCCO BUILDING X 17. UTILITIES: SEWER - CITY OF DOVER SOU 2,100 SQ. FT. BAYHEALTH WATER - CITY OF DOVER ° 35 ERI A ELECTRIC - CITY OF DOVER AL Y X 17 GAS - CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES ' 27" MEDICAL 24x36 24x36 EXISTING ONE-STORY 44 COVERED ENTRANCE BRICK 38 BUILDING 26 FP X 18. PREDOMINANT SOILS: SaB: SASSAFRAS SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER E CENTER, INC 19. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: 85% 17 10,800 S.F. ± - FOOTPRINT X 24x36 15' REAR YARD 20. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: IO ZONING - 85% PERMITTED 24x36 193 27" SETBACK LINE POST PHASE 3: PROPOSED 5.5 AC. / 11.43 AC. = 48% FP X 21. OUTDOOR LIGHTING: LIGHTING SHALL BE 1.5 FOOT CANDLES (MINIMUM) AT GRADE SCULL PROPERTY SITE DEVELOPMENT 24x36 24x36 X 10 9 17 19 13 60" FP X MASTER PLAN BAYHEALTH STAFF 24x36 24x36 D. ONE STORY X 17 19 13 E FRAME 34" BUILDING 176 PARKING LOT 5,044 SQ. FT. X .50' 24x36 34' FP EXPANSION 24x36 N 1° SCULL TERRACE 98 X N 78° 28' 32 E 605 S. STATE STREET X "E CITY OF DOVER 25.33' 10' SIDE YARD FLOODPLAIN LINE 37.87' 24x36 24x36 12 18 2020 13 SETBACK LINE FP KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE FCM 18" FCM 121.55' S 11° 54' 41" SHEET TITLE 24" 1115.96' S 72° 59' 55" W COVER SHEET 24x36 24x36 X 15 0 15 30 30 45 45 FP 60 60 75 75 90 75 60 90 75 60 X 45 45 30 30 20' WIDE KENT COUNTY 15 0 15 LANDS N/F 24x36 24x36 UTILITY EASEMENT X CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS, DOVER, DELAWARE T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5600-00001 DEED REF.: Q-0020-0165 X ZONING - IO X X X FP 24x36 24x36 X X X 20' X 24x36 24x36 X FP X X 20' WIDE CITY OF DOVE 24" R UTILITY EASEMENT X 24x36 24x36 0 25 50 100 GENERAL NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: 2019-184-General-Notes-L-001 1. THE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS COMPILED FROM A FIELD SURVEY 11. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL BE ACCORDANACE WITH THE CITY OF DOVER 24x36 24x36 PERFORMED BY BECKER MORGAN GROUP, INC. , DOVER, DE. IN APRIL 2020. PROJECT VERTICAL DATUM IS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE STATE OF Do Not Explode - Select Scale BASED ON NAVD 88 AND PROJECT HORIZONTAL DATUM IS BASED ON DELAWARE STATE PLANE (NAD83), GPS DERIVED FROM N.G.S. CONTROL MONUMENTS. DELAWARE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SCALE: 1" = 50' 12. ALL FIRE LANE DEMARCATION AND FIRE LANE SIGNS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL THE STATE FIRE PREVENTION REGULATIONS. 24x36 24x36 2. THE BOUNDARY LINES PORTRAYED HEREON HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BASED SOLELY ON PHYSICAL EVIDENCE DISCOVERED IN THE FIELD IN CONJUNCTION WITH DETERMINATIONS DERIVED FROM SOURCE OF ISSUE BLOCK 13. EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF HOLY CROSS CHURCH FOR PURPOSE OF INGRESS TITLE AND ADJACENT DEED RECORD INFORMATION. AND EGRESS ACROSS LANDS OF KENT GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC. (P. 51.00) SHOWN HEREON, IN DEED BOOK 24x36 3. ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS AND SIZES SHOWN HEREON ARE EITHER MARKED LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD, O47 PAGE 063 DATED JANUARY 30, 1987 AND RECORDED IN THE KENT COUNTY OFFICE OF RECORDER OF DEEDS. ENGINEERS CERTIFICATION 2019-184-Engineers-Cert PARKING SUMMARY - BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER CAMPUS 24x36 VISIBLE AND FIELD LOCATED STRUCTURES OR TAKEN FROM UTILITY MAPS PROVIDED BY UTILITY 2019-184-Parking-Data-001 PROVIDERS. HOWEVER, LACKING EXCAVATION, THE EXACT LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FEATURES 14. THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT TARGET AREA AND THEREFORE, EXEMPT I, GREGORY V. MOORE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A REGISTERED ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE, 1. SUBJECT AREA: 38.47 ACRES ± / 1,676,139 S.F. ± CANNOT BE ACCURATELY, COMPLETELY AND RELIABLY DEPICTED. FROM THE REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF THE SOURCE WATER PROTECTION OVERLAY ZONE THAT THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON HAS BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF 2. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: 2,052 (TOTAL STAFF) 24x36 4. THE AREA OF DEVELOPMENT SHOWN HEREON IS NOT IMPACTED BY THE 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE AS SHOWN (SWPOZ), TIER 3 - EXCELLENT RECHARGE AREA. MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF REPRESENTS GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES AS REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE 24x36 ON KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE FIRM MAP 10001C0169J, PANEL 169, REVISED JULY 7, 2014. PORTIONS OF LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. 15. THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN FOR THE PROJECT SITE ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE SOURCE WATER AREA EXISTING POST POST POST THE OVERALL PROPERTY ARE LOCATED WITHIN ZONE "X", AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD. PROTECTION OVERLAY ZONE (SWPOZ), TIER 1 - SECONDARY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS. PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 5. WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE FIELD LOCATED BY BECKER MORGAN GROUP, AS DELINEATED BY 16. THE PROPERTY WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND WAS GRANTED "ON-CAMPUS" HOSPITAL PARKING: 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 24x36 BY WATERSHED ECO, LLC. THE AREA OF DEVELOPMENT SHOWN HEREON IS NOT IMPACTED BY APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN ON MAY 20, 2013 WITH THE FOLLOWING DECISIONS: 24x36 FRESHWATER WETLANDS. GREGORY V. MOORE P.E. NO. 9311 DATE "OFF-CAMPUS" HOSPITAL PARKING: 242 242 242 242 1. APPROVED A WAIVER FOR ELIMINATION OF PORTIONS OF UPRIGHT CURBING TO ALLOW THE FLOW OF 6. ALL ROADS, PARKING AND OTHER PAVED AREAS WILL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED AND ARE STORMWATER RUNOFF INTO THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA. SCULL PROPERTY PARKING 227 517 589 680 . NOT INTENDED FOR DEDICATION. 2. APPROVED THE USE OF JOINT PARKING FACILITIES PROVISIONS WHICH WILL ALLOW THE PROPOSED . . . TOTAL CAMPUS PARKING 1,601 1,891 1,963 2,054 7. PARKING FOR THIS PROJECT TO BE COMBINED WITH THE EXISTING PARKING PROVIDED ON THE MAIN 24x36 DELAWARE REGULATIONS PROHIBIT THE BURIAL OF CONSTRUCTION DEMOLITION DEBRIS, INCLUDING 24x36 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION TREES AND STUMPS ON CONSTRUCTION SITES. ANY SOLID WASTE FOUND DURING EXCAVATION MUST BE BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER FACILITIES. LAYER STATE: C-001 8. REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISCARDED. ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING DEMARCATION, STALLS, AND BUILDING ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL COMPLY 3. BASED ON DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER AND HOLY CROSS CHURCH & SCHOOL, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS WERE MET: OWNERS CERTIFICATION 2019-184-Owners-Cert SHEET INDEX 2019-184-Sheet-Index PROJECT NO.: 2019184-07 A. THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ENTRANCE DRIVE (SCULL TERRACE) C-001 COVER SHEET DATE: 2020-09-04 24x36 24x36 WITH THE "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT". WE, BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, INC., HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE ARE THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE HOLY CROSS PROPERTY BETWEEN SOUTH STATE STREET AND HOLY CROSS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, THAT THE PLAN WAS MADE AT OUR DIRECTION, AND THAT WE 9. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENT FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF ENTRANCE ARE TO BE ELIMINATED. ACKNOWLEDGE THE SAME TO US BY ACT AND DESIRE THE PLAN TO BE DEVELOPED AS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE C-101 EXISTING CONDITION SCALE: AS SHOWN 1970 AND ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS THERETO APPURTENANT. B. THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ENTRANCE DRIVE (SCULL TERRACE) WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. C-201 SITE PLAN - PHASE 1 ADJACENT TO THE HOLY CROSS PROPERTY AND EAST OF THE HOLY CROSS ENTRANCE ARE TO BE DRAWN BY: M.A.R. PROJ. MGR.: M.A.R. 24x36 24x36 10. BEFORE THE CONTRACTOR CAN BEGIN CONSTRUCTION HE MUST OBTAIN THE PROPER PERMITS AND/OR ELIMINATED. C-202 SITE PLAN - PHASE 2 APPROVALS FROM THE CITY OF DOVER (C.O.D.), DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SHEET (D.N.R.E.C.), DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DELDOT), CITY OF DOVER DEPARTMENT OF C-203 SITE PLAN - PHASE 3 24x36 PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF DOVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AND APPROPRIATE STATE AND COUNTY AGENCIES. MIKE METZING VP, CORPORATE SUPPORT SERVICES DATE L-101 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN LOT CONSOLIDATION PLAN C-001 COPYRIGHT 2020 24x36 C-001 - BayHealth Scull Property 120 24x36 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2019\2019184-07\DWG\201918407-Site-C3d18.dwg, Sep 04, 2020 - 12:41pm 24x36

24x36 24x36 Item 7. UE X LEGEND FP ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED 24x36 24x36 12 X SANITARY GRAVITY SEWER LINE, EX. 10"S 10" S FP SIZE & FLOW DIRECTION OT FP X SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN, SIZE 24x36 24x36 LANDS N/F FP EX. 10" F.M. 12" F.M. 12 & FLOW DIRECTION FP 18 U.T. RICHARD J. KOSIOR U.T. & KATHLEEN P. KOSIOR FP SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (S.M.H.) X T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7100-00001 DEED REF.: 5045-0067 P LANDS N/F 24x36 LANDS N/F F MICHAEL GRANT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 24x36 MATHEW PERZA ZONING - R8 X EX. 15"S T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7101-00001 & RACHEL GRANT FP EX. 10" W 12" W 12 FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6500-00001 WATER MAIN & SIZE RCP DEED REF.: 8452-0199 EX. 48" OT ZONING - R8 DEED REF.: 9012-0298 FP ZONING - R8 FIRE HYDRANT F.H. F.H. ARCH I T E C TURE EX. 6"W X 24x36 24x36 EX. 15"S LANDS N/F WATER VALVE (W.V.) OR METER (W.M.) N 78° 25' 47 FP DENNIS J. GRIMM T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6400-00001 FP W.M. W.V. W.M. W.V. ENG I NE E R I NG " EEX. 48" RC X FCM DEED REF.: 5079-0078 LANDS N/F STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (S.D.M.H.) PFIP Dover, DE N 16° 12' ZONING - R8 KATHLEEN M. UNTERKOFLER 10" W 75.44' FP EX. 15"S 12 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6300-00001 24x36 STORM DRAIN LINE (CMP OR RCP) 24x36 X U.T. FP FP DEED REF.: IS-0026-0405 LANDS N/F LISA MARIE ROSSI 309 S. Governors Ave. OT ZONING - R8 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6200-00001 CATCH BASIN Dover, DE 19904 FP 343.96' EX. 12"S FP Ph. 302.734.7950 X FIR DEED REF.: 7048-0014 FP FP ZONING - R8 UTILITY POLE W/ OVERHEAD SERVICE 24x36 S (TELEPHONE X X OR ELECTRIC OR BOTH) FP Fax 302.734.7965 24x36 48.98' 68 V X 26.45' V X U.T. 18 17 16 15 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE °0 FP "S EX. 15 V FP FP X X X X UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC U.E. U.E. Salisbury, MD 14 6' X FP FH 18 EX V V FP X X FP FP X . 4 33 FP FP UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE U.T. U.T. 312 West Main St. Suite 300 24x36 8" "E FP FP 24x36 SCM 12 FP FIP RC FP UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN EX. 2" G 2" G Salisbury, MD 21801 P FP EX. 15"S X W.V FP Ph. 410.546.9100 V V . FIR FP FP OE OE PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED N/A 188 OE OE OE Fax 410.546.5824 1 OE OE X 112 OE OE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER OE OE OE Wilmington, NC 24x36 24x36 2 OE OE OE OE OE OE V LANDS N/F OE OE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SLAB / PAVING 13 MOLLY B. PHILLIPS APPROXIMATE LOCATION FP 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 X EX. 8"S FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6100-00001 FP W.V . 11 OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN V 12 DEED REF.: 7372-0173 IMPERVIOUS SURFACED ROAD, DRIVE Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 W.V W 24" 24" 30" 14 12 7. ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F OR LOT FP 24x36 EX. 8"W . 13 16 FP Ph. 910.341.7600 .V. 24x36 24" DONALD L. HENRY X . 15 14 FP ' T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6000-00001 INDIVIDUAL TREE OR BUSH N/A UT W.V UT 15 FP V DEED REF.: 5775-0149 EVERGREEN DECIDUOUS Fax 910.341.7506 16 36" 16 N 87 ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F X X X ° 59' WIRE FENCE X X X www.beckermorgan.com X GIA DOWNTOWN FP FP V 32" E PROPERTIES, LLC CHAINLINK FENCE FP 17 18 19 17 V 96" 24x36 19 24x36 FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-5901-00001 X STOCKADE FENCE 18 DEED REF.: 8444-0331 OE FP V ZONING - R8 FIP FP STRUCTURE (CONCRETE, WOOD, 19 FP V 152. FP METAL, ETC.) 09' LIMITS OF PROPOSED FP U.T. FP 24x36 24x36 X N 77° 42' 04" EX. 12"S U.T. V 20 20 E DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE RADIUS: 1462.69' PARKING IMPROVEMENTS V V 50.03' EMBANKMENT SIDESLOPES (DOWN) 21 S 15° 02' 25" E 24x36 ARC LENGTH: 284.55' V X CONTOUR 49 55 24x36 CHORD BEARING: N 10° 37' 47" W 48" 21 V V 7.58' FP 22 FCM 43.55 FP .90' CHORD LENGTH: 284.10' FP V ELEVATION SPOT SHOT 25.50 T.C. 25.15 108 47" W 25.00 B.C. 20 23 34' BENCH MARK X N/A 52° 24x36 24x36 22 48" 24" S PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 23 X FP AC CENTERLINE FP 24 FP 5' LIGHT POLE FP 24 25 74.9 24x36 24x36 X N/A .85' CONSTRUCTION NOTE 26 48" 15' REAR YARD FP 183 EX. 18"S 10 1 21 FP SETBACK LINE X 27 FP 25 TWO STORY 1 2 S 15° 02' 25" E 24x36 FP 24x36 BRICK 1 BUILDING 13 4 FP X LANDS N/F 2,743 SQ. FT. 1 5 RADIUS: 1462.69' 1 6 CITY OF DOVER 1 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5700-00001 17 8 X 24x36 ARC LENGTH: 462.51' 22 24x36 DEED REF.: 5011-0121 CHORD BEARING: N 7° 08' 39" W 26 EX. SD. CB 1 9 FP 1 ZONING - IO 20 1 CHORD LENGTH: 460.59' 48" GRATE: 27.49' FP X INV.: 26.06' FP 2 2 24x36 AC 2 APPROXIMATE LOCATION LANDS N/F 24x36 "S 23 X 70.00' EX. 12 23 60" 24 OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN CITY OF DOVER ONE STORY 27 FRAME 25 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5000-00001 26 N 74° 57' 34" E FP X DEED REF.: T-0036-0203 BUILDING 24x36 28 1,112 SQ. FT. 27 170.01' FP ZONING - IO 24x36 71.52' 98.49' S 15° 02' 25" E X V 28 FP 24 5 3 V X FP 24x36 24x36 V 24" 28 FP PROPERTY LINE TO BE V X 29 EXTINGUISHED PER THE V FP FP CONSOLIDATION PLAN V 24x36 24x36 X 25 29 60" 25 30" TV 26 UE FP 20' FRONT YARD X FIP 80.00' 9 SETBACK LINE OT 27 30 24x36 24x36 30" OE OE OE OT TV PROJECT TITLE 36" X X X OE 10 UT X 11 BAYHEALTH 24" 28 OT 265 12 30" 31 14 EX. SD. CB ONE STORY 2 4 13 S8 RADIUS: 1462.69' GRATE: 29.22' 2 14 7° 2 X POLE 9' 2 MEDICAL 29 EX. 15" R.C.P. 245 24x36 24x36 X ARC LENGTH: 177.96' 26 31 15" INV.: 25.56' BUILDING TV 15 2" E CHORD BEARING: N 1° 34' 16" W UT 1,440 SQ. FT. 26 2 16 N 73° 01' 53" E X 17 28.34' X 78.4 EET CHORD LENGTH: 177.86' EXISTING ASPHALT 18 8' CENTER, INC X EX. SAN. MH. 30" PARKING AREA 15 19 OT EX. 15" R.C.P. 20 RIM EL.: 13.81' S 74 24x36 24x36 EX. 15" RCP X 30 21 EX. SD. CB INV: 25.22' UE 22 °5 GRATE: 30.91' EX. 15" R.C.P. 0' X SCULL PROPERTY 23 5 . W.V 15" INV.: 25.86' TV 8" STR 11 "S 6 . W.M 31 X. X E SITE DEVELOPMENT UT UE E EX. SD. M.H. 24 24x36 24x36 EX. SD. M.H. G.M. X RIM: 29.62' RIM: 28.64' TWO STORY 26 20 MASTER PLAN KCR OT W 11 15" INV.: 25.52' 15" INV.: 25.48' T FRAME BUILDING X U 25 EX. 6"S OT 1,044 SQ. FT. 5 X FP 24 3 TE 25 BAYHEALTH STAFF 24x36 2 FP 24x36 25, IDE R EX. CLEANOUT X 32 EX. 6"S 23 4 LID: 26.81' INV.: 22.23' 30 29 2 PARKING LOT EX. 12" STEEL X 31 UE 19 32 28 EX. SIGN TV 25 UT X STA MIN IG FP FP TV EXPANSION UT G UT EX. C.B.: UT 27 12" STEEL - MD - 7.13' 26 26.64' 27 OR HT O UT EX. C.B.: TV GRATE: 24x36 24x36 X UT UT G UE G EX. 30" F.M. UE UT GRATE: 26.88' 26 4" PVC - MD - 2.01' UE UE 10 UE UE ELECTRIC UEPANEL FP UE UE X 18 OT UE UE UT TV 26 EX. C.B.: 3.8 605 S. STATE STREET 8 ART F W FP 8" PVC - MD - 5.55' G 8" PVC - MD - 5.84' X GRATE: 27.01' ' CITY OF DOVER MD: -4.58' 17 SHED FP 4" PVC - MD - 2.34' TV 4" PVC - MD - 1.66' 4" PVC - MD - 1.70' G X 24x36 24x36 8" PVC - MD - 3.84' UE KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE A 8" PVC - MD - 3.53' ERI UTTV G.M. SOU 30" 33 FP AL Y 28 UT FP X SHEET TITLE TWO STORY 12"S TH STUCCO BUILDING UT 34 S 34 EXISTING 24x36 24x36 2,100 SQ. FT. G.M. EX. G X 60 UT ° 35 FO CONDITIONS PLAN EX. 10" WATER EX. 6" C.B.: 11 26 GRATE: 25.86' FP X ' 27" UT EX. 18"S TV EXISTING ONE-STORY 24x36 24x36 .P. UT R.C .88' UT UT 33 32 COVERED ENTRANCE BRICK BUILDING X E UT TOTAL PARKING 24" EX. 184 UT 31 OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER 24x36 30 G 16 10,800 S.F. ± - FOOTPRINT FP X 24x36 SPACES: 227 UT 15' REAR YARD 26 27" UT EX. 1' C.B.: GRATE: 25.62' 29 3 UT 28 27 TV 26 SETBACK LINE X EXISTING ASPHALT UT PARKING AREA 24x36 UT UT UT UT GEN 24x36 28 X FP G UT W.M. W.V. W.M. 27 X 10 17 32 32 32 G UE 24x36 24x36 27 AC G 33 60" 33 7 X 29 32 TV W.V. AC FP 0 20 40 80 UT UT TV 28 EX. 8" W W.V. X 31 UT 3 ONE STORY 24x36 30 LIGHT POLE 27 D. FRAME 24x36 30 G (typ.) 176 E 29 31 G 16 BUILDING Do Not Explode - Select Scale SCALE: 1" = 40' X 34" G G G G.V. 28 5,044 SQ. FT. F.H. .50' W.V. FP 32 6 TV AC 24x36 34' X 24x36 27 F.M. EX. 10" W 33 27 EXISTING ISSUE BLOCK N 1° SCULL TERRACE EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB 30" 34 UT UT EX. 24" R.C.P. UT X 33 32 PARKING AREA UE EX. 26 N 78° 28' 32 "E X E 10' SIDE YARD FLOODPLAIN LINE FP X UTILITY POLE (typ.) EXISTING 24x36 24x36 25.33' UT UT WHEELCHAIR RAMP 37.87' TV UE OE UE OE OE G G G 43 SETBACK LINE UE UE TV OETV TV G 26 G TV TV UE G G S 11° 54' 41" W.M . TV UE OE UE TV UE . F.H TV OE UE OE OE TV 121.55' 24x36 24x36 FCM UE FCM . W.V 18" UE UE UE FP 24" . W.V . W.V 1115.96' 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 S 72° 59' 55" W 10"S X 29 .P. EX. SAN. MH. 15 0 15 R.C 30 30 24x36 EX. 60 45 45 60 24x36 RIM EL.: 26.85 75 75 90 90 X 24" 75 75 18" INV.: 2.02' 60 60 45 45 30 30 20' WIDE KENT COUNTY 15 0 15 EX. FP 12 LANDS N/F W X . UTILITY EASEMENT .1 0" . . . CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS, DOVER, DELAWARE S 24x36 EX 18" 24x36 30 X MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 30 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5600-00001 EX. LAYER STATE: C-101 DEED REF.: Q-0020-0165 12 PROJECT NO.: 2019184-07 X ZONING - IO X X X FP 30 X DATE: 2020-09-04 24x36 24x36 30 X EX. 12" 29 R.C .P. 28 12 X SCALE: AS SHOWN 27 X OE 20' FP DRAWN BY: M.A.R. PROJ. MGR.: M.A.R. 24x36 24x36 X 12 X SHEET C-101 20' WIDE CITY OF DOVE R X 24" UTILITY EASEMENT 24x36 24x36 X 12 FP COPYRIGHT 2020 C-101 - Existing Conditions - Skull Property 121 24x36 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2019\2019184-07\DWG\201918407-Site-C3d18.dwg, Sep 04, 2020 - 12:44pm 24x36

24x36 24x36 Item 7. UE X LEGEND FP ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED 24x36 24x36 12 X SANITARY GRAVITY SEWER LINE, EX. 10"S 10" S FP SIZE & FLOW DIRECTION FP X SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN, SIZE 24x36 24x36 LANDS N/F FP EX. 10" F.M. 12" F.M. 12 & FLOW DIRECTION FP 18 U.T. RICHARD J. KOSIOR U.T. & KATHLEEN P. KOSIOR FP SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (S.M.H.) X T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7100-00001 DEED REF.: 5045-0067 P LANDS N/F 24x36 LANDS N/F F MICHAEL GRANT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 24x36 MATHEW PERZA ZONING - R8 X EX. 15"S T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7101-00001 & RACHEL GRANT FP EX. 10" W 12" W 12 FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6500-00001 WATER MAIN & SIZE RCP DEED REF.: 8452-0199 EX. 48" ZONING - R8 DEED REF.: 9012-0298 FP ZONING - R8 FIRE HYDRANT F.H. F.H. ARCH I T E C TURE EX. 6"W X 24x36 24x36 EX. 15"S LANDS N/F WATER VALVE (W.V.) OR METER (W.M.) N 78° 25' 47 FP DENNIS J. GRIMM T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6400-00001 FP W.M. W.V. W.M. W.V. ENG I NE E R I NG " EEX. 48" RC X FCM DEED REF.: 5079-0078 LANDS N/F STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (S.D.M.H.) PFIP Dover, DE N 16° 12' ZONING - R8 KATHLEEN M. UNTERKOFLER 10" W 75.44' FP EX. 15"S 12 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6300-00001 24x36 STORM DRAIN LINE (CMP OR RCP) 24x36 X U.T. FP FP DEED REF.: IS-0026-0405 LANDS N/F LISA MARIE ROSSI 309 S. Governors Ave. ZONING - R8 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6200-00001 CATCH BASIN Dover, DE 19904 FP 343.96' EX. 12"S FP Ph. 302.734.7950 X FIR DEED REF.: 7048-0014 FP FP ZONING - R8 UTILITY POLE W/ OVERHEAD SERVICE 24x36 S X X OR ELECTRIC (TELEPHONE OR BOTH) FP Fax 302.734.7965 24x36 48.98' 68 V X 26.45' V X U.T. 18 17 16 15 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE °0 FP "S EX. 15 V FP FP X X X X UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC U.E. U.E. Salisbury, MD 14 6' X FP FH 18 EX V V FP X X FP FP X . 4 33 FP FP UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE U.T. U.T. 312 West Main St. Suite 300 24x36 8" "E FP FP 24x36 SCM 12 FP RC FP UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN EX. 2" G 2" G Salisbury, MD 21801 P FP EX. 15"S X W.V FP Ph. 410.546.9100 V V . FIR FP FP OE OE PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED N/A 188 OE OE OE Fax 410.546.5824 1 OE OE X 112 OE OE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER OE OE OE Wilmington, NC 24x36 24x36 2 OE OE OE OE OE OE V LANDS N/F OE OE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SLAB / PAVING 13 MOLLY B. PHILLIPS APPROXIMATE LOCATION FP 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 X EX. 8"S FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6100-00001 FP W.V . 11 OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN V 12 DEED REF.: 7372-0173 IMPERVIOUS SURFACED ROAD, DRIVE Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 W.V W 24" 24" 30" 14 12 7. ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F OR LOT FP 24x36 EX. 8"W . 13 16 FP Ph. 910.341.7600 .V. 24x36 24" DONALD L. HENRY X . 15 14 FP ' T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6000-00001 INDIVIDUAL TREE OR BUSH N/A UT W.V UT 15 FP V DEED REF.: 5775-0149 EVERGREEN DECIDUOUS Fax 910.341.7506 16 36" 16 N 87 ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F X X X ° 59' WIRE FENCE X X X www.beckermorgan.com X GIA DOWNTOWN FP FP V 32" E PROPERTIES, LLC CHAINLINK FENCE FP 17 18 19 17 V 96" 24x36 19 24x36 FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-5901-00001 X STOCKADE FENCE 18 DEED REF.: 8444-0331 OE V 5 FP ZONING - R8 FP STRUCTURE (CONCRETE, WOOD, 19 FP V 152. FP METAL, ETC.) 24x36 U.T. 09' X FP 24x36 FP N 77° 42' 04" EX. 12"S U.T. V 20 20 V E DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE V 50.03' EMBANKMENT SIDESLOPES (DOWN) RADIUS: 1462.69' 21 ARC LENGTH: 284.55' V S 15° 02' 25" E CONTOUR 49 55 24x36 X 24x36 CHORD BEARING: N 10° 37' 47" W 48" 21 V V 7.58' FP 22 Xref-Phase-1-Parking-Blk 43.55 FP .90' CHORD LENGTH: 284.10' FP V ELEVATION SPOT SHOT 25.50 T.C. 25.15 108 47" W 25.00 B.C. 20 23 34' BENCH MARK X N/A 18' 18' 24' 18' 52° 24x36 24x36 22 S PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 10 48" 24" 23 X FP AC CENTERLINE FP 24 FP 5' LIGHT POLE FP 24 25 74.9 24x36 24x36 18 9 X N/A .85' CONSTRUCTION NOTE 26 48" 15' REAR YARD FP 183 EX. 18"S 10 1 21 FP SETBACK LINE X 27 FP 25 TWO STORY 1 2 S 15° 02' 25" E 24x36 FP 24x36 BRICK 1 BUILDING 13 4 FP X LANDS N/F 2,743 SQ. FT. 1 5 RADIUS: 1462.69' 1 6 CITY OF DOVER 1 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5700-00001 10 17 8 X 24x36 ARC LENGTH: 462.51' 22 24x36 DEED REF.: 5011-0121 CHORD BEARING: N 7° 08' 39" W 26 1 9 FP 1 ZONING - IO 20 1 CHORD LENGTH: 460.59' 48" FP X FP 2 2 PROPOSED 2 LANDS N/F 24x36 AC APPROXIMATE LOCATION 24x36 "S CONCRETE CURB (typ.) 23 X 70.00' . EX. 12 23 60" 24 OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN CITY OF DOVER ONE STORY 27 FRAME 25 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5000-00001 BUILDING 26 N 74° 57' 34" E FP X DEED REF.: T-0036-0203 N 24x36 28 1,112 SQ. FT. 27 170.01' FP ZONING - IO 24x36 71.52' 10 34 98.49' S 15° 02' 25" E X V 28 24 10 FP V X FP 24x36 24x36 V 24" PHASE 1 PARKING ADDITION 28 FP PROPOSED PARKING PROPERTY LINE TO BE V X 29 139,815 S.F. / 15,535 S.Y. LIGHT FIXTURE (typ.) EXTINGUISHED PER THE V FP FP CONSOLIDATION PLAN V 24x36 24x36 X 25 29 60" 25 30" 9' 26 18' FP 20' FRONT YARD X 30' SETBACK LINE 27 36OE 30 21 9 80.00' 24x36 24x36 30" OE OE OE PROJECT TITLE 36" X X X 10 X 11 BAYHEALTH 28 24" 18' 265 12 30" 31 ONE STORY 2 4 13 S8 RADIUS: 1462.69' 2 14 X7° 2 POLE 9' 2 294 197 MEDICAL 29 245 24x36 24x36 X ARC LENGTH: 177.96' 26 31 BUILDING 15 2" E CHORD BEARING: N 1° 34' 16" W 1,440 SQ. FT. 26 2 16 N 73° 01' 53" E X 24' 17 28.34' X 78.4 EET CHORD LENGTH: 177.86' EXISTING ASPHALT 18 8' CENTER, INC X 30" PARKING AREA 15 19 40' 20 S 10 74 24x36 24x36 30 21 X 18' 22 °5 0' X SCULL PROPERTY 23 5 . W.V 24' 8" STR 38 34 6 "S . W.M 31 X. X E SITE DEVELOPMENT E 24 24x36 24x36 18' TWO STORY 26 X 20 MASTER PLAN KCR OT W FRAME BUILDING 25 X EX. 6"S 1,044 SQ. FT. X FP PROPOSED PROPOSED 24 3 TE 25 BAYHEALTH STAFF 24x36 2 FP 24x36 24' 25, IDE R X 32 CONCRETE CURB (typ.) EX. 6"S CONCRETE CURB (typ.) 23 4 30 29 2 PARKING LOT X 31 24' 32 28 EX. SIGN 25 X STA MIN IG 9' 27 FP FP 12" STEEL - MD - 7.13' 26 EXPANSION 27 18' OR HT O 24x36 24x36 X EX. 30" F.M. 26 4" PVC - MD - 2.01' FP 42 34 26 X 18 3.8 605 S. STATE STREET 8 ART F W FP 8" PVC - MD - 5.55' 8" PVC - MD - 5.84' X 18' 4" PVC - MD - 1.66' 4" PVC - MD - 1.70' 4" PVC - MD - 2.34' SHED ' FP CITY OF DOVER X 24x36 24x36 8" PVC - MD - 3.84' 9 KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE A 8" PVC - MD - 3.53' SOU ERI 30" 33 FP AL Y 28 FP TWO STORY X SHEET TITLE 12"S 24' PROPOSED STUCCOPARKING TH BUILDING 34 S 34 LIGHT FIXTURE (typ.) SITE PLAN 24x36 24x36 2,100 SQ. FT. G.M. EX. X 60 ° 35 FO 17 PHASE 1 EX. 10" WATER 26 FP X EXISTING ONE-STORY EX. 18"S ' 27" 24x36 24x36 44 .P. 32 COVERED BRICK BUILDING R.C 33 .88' ENTRANCE X E TOTAL PARKING 24" 31 OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER 184 17 EX. 24x36 30 10,800 S.F. ± - FOOTPRINT FP X 24x36 15' REAR YARD SPACES: 517 26 27" PHASE 1 EXISTING PARKING 29 PROPOSED 28 27 26 SETBACK LINE X EXISTING ASPHALT ACCESSIBLE RAMP (typ.) TO BE PARKING REPAVED AREA 14 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES (2 VAN) 36,261 S.F. / 4,029 S.Y. GEN 24x36 24x36 28 X W.V. FP W.M. W.M. 17 27 X 24x36 32 32 32 10 9 24x36 27 AC 33 60" 33 X 29 32 W.V. AC FP 0 20 40 80 EX. 8" W 28 3 W.V. X PROPOSED 31 ONE STORY 24x36 LIGHT POLE 27 D. 24x36 17 FRAME 30 30 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (typ.) 176 E 29 31 BUILDING Do Not Explode - Select Scale SCALE: 1" = 40' X 34" 28 5,044 SQ. FT. F.H. .50' W.V. FP 32 AC 26 24x36 34' X 24x36 27 F.M. EX. 10" W 33 27 EXISTING ISSUE BLOCK N 1° SCULL TERRACE EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB 30" 34 EX. 24" R.C.P. X 33 32 PARKING AREA EX. 26 N 78° 28' 32 "E X E 10' SIDE YARD FLOODPLAIN LINE FP X UTILITY POLE (typ.) EXISTING 24x36 24x36 25.33' WHEELCHAIR RAMP 37.87' OE SETBACK LINE OE OE OE 12 26 18 23 S 11° 54' 41" OE W.M . . F.H OE OE OE 121.55' 24x36 24x36 FCM FCM . W.V 18" FP 24" . W.V . W.V 1115.96' 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 S 72° 59' 55" W 10"S X 29 .P. 15 0 15 R.C 30 30 24x36 EX. 60 75 90 45 45 60 75 90 X 24x36 24" 75 60 75 60 45 45 30 30 20' WIDE KENT COUNTY 15 0 15 EX. FP 12 LANDS N/F W X . UTILITY EASEMENT .1 0" . . . CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS, DOVER, DELAWARE S 24x36 EX 18" 24x36 30 X MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 30 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5600-00001 EX. LAYER STATE: C-201 DEED REF.: Q-0020-0165 12 PROJECT NO.: 2019184-07 X ZONING - IO X X X FP 30 X DATE: 2020-09-04 24x36 24x36 30 X EX. 12" 29 R.C .P. 28 12 X SCALE: AS SHOWN 27 X OE 20' FP DRAWN BY: M.A.R. PROJ. MGR.: M.A.R. 24x36 24x36 X 12 X SHEET C-201 20' WIDE CITY OF DOVE R X 24" UTILITY EASEMENT 24x36 24x36 X 12 FP COPYRIGHT 2020 C-201 - BayHealth Scull Property - Phase 1 122 24x36 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2019\2019184-07\DWG\201918407-Site-C3d18.dwg, Sep 04, 2020 - 12:26pm 24x36

24x36 24x36 Item 7. UE X LEGEND FP ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED 24x36 24x36 12 X SANITARY GRAVITY SEWER LINE, EX. 10"S 10" S FP SIZE & FLOW DIRECTION FP X SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN, SIZE 24x36 24x36 LANDS N/F FP EX. 10" F.M. 12" F.M. 12 & FLOW DIRECTION FP 18 U.T. RICHARD J. KOSIOR U.T. & KATHLEEN P. KOSIOR FP SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (S.M.H.) X T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7100-00001 DEED REF.: 5045-0067 P LANDS N/F 24x36 LANDS N/F F MICHAEL GRANT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 24x36 MATHEW PERZA ZONING - R8 X EX. 15"S T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7101-00001 & RACHEL GRANT FP EX. 10" W 12" W 12 FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6500-00001 WATER MAIN & SIZE RCP DEED REF.: 8452-0199 EX. 48" ZONING - R8 DEED REF.: 9012-0298 FP ZONING - R8 FIRE HYDRANT F.H. F.H. ARCH I T E C TURE EX. 6"W X 24x36 24x36 EX. 15"S LANDS N/F WATER VALVE (W.V.) OR METER (W.M.) N 78° 25' 47 FP DENNIS J. GRIMM T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6400-00001 FP W.M. W.V. W.M. W.V. ENG I NE E R I NG " EEX. 48" RC X FCM DEED REF.: 5079-0078 LANDS N/F STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (S.D.M.H.) PFIP Dover, DE N 16° 12' ZONING - R8 KATHLEEN M. UNTERKOFLER 10" W 75.44' FP EX. 15"S 12 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6300-00001 24x36 STORM DRAIN LINE (CMP OR RCP) 24x36 X U.T. FP FP DEED REF.: IS-0026-0405 LANDS N/F LISA MARIE ROSSI 309 S. Governors Ave. ZONING - R8 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6200-00001 CATCH BASIN Dover, DE 19904 FP 343.96' EX. 12"S FP Ph. 302.734.7950 X FIR DEED REF.: 7048-0014 FP FP ZONING - R8 UTILITY POLE W/ OVERHEAD SERVICE 24x36 S X X OR ELECTRIC (TELEPHONE OR BOTH) FP Fax 302.734.7965 24x36 48.98' 68 V X 26.45' V X U.T. 18 17 16 15 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE °0 FP "S EX. 15 V FP FP X X X X UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC U.E. U.E. Salisbury, MD 14 6' X FP FH 18 EX V V FP X X FP FP X . 4 33 FP FP UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE U.T. U.T. 312 West Main St. Suite 300 24x36 8" "E FP FP 24x36 SCM 12 FP RC FP UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN EX. 2" G 2" G Salisbury, MD 21801 P FP EX. 15"S X W.V FP Ph. 410.546.9100 V V . FIR FP FP OE OE PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED N/A 188 OE OE OE Fax 410.546.5824 1 OE OE X 112 OE OE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER OE OE OE Wilmington, NC 24x36 24x36 2 OE OE OE OE OE OE V LANDS N/F OE OE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SLAB / PAVING 13 MOLLY B. PHILLIPS APPROXIMATE LOCATION FP 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 X EX. 8"S FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6100-00001 FP W.V . 11 OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN V 12 DEED REF.: 7372-0173 IMPERVIOUS SURFACED ROAD, DRIVE Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 W.V W 24" 24" 30" 14 12 7. ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F OR LOT FP 24x36 EX. 8"W . 13 16 FP Ph. 910.341.7600 .V. 24x36 24" DONALD L. HENRY X . 15 14 FP ' T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6000-00001 INDIVIDUAL TREE OR BUSH N/A UT W.V UT 15 FP V DEED REF.: 5775-0149 EVERGREEN DECIDUOUS Fax 910.341.7506 16 36" 16 N 87 ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F X X X ° 59' WIRE FENCE X X X www.beckermorgan.com X GIA DOWNTOWN FP FP V 32" E PROPERTIES, LLC CHAINLINK FENCE FP 17 18 19 17 V 96" 24x36 19 24x36 FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-5901-00001 X STOCKADE FENCE 18 DEED REF.: 8444-0331 OE V 5 FP ZONING - R8 FP STRUCTURE (CONCRETE, WOOD, 19 FP V 152. FP METAL, ETC.) 24x36 U.T. 09' X FP 24x36 FP N 77° 42' 04" EX. 12"S U.T. V 20 20 V E DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE V 50.03' EMBANKMENT SIDESLOPES (DOWN) RADIUS: 1462.69' 21 ARC LENGTH: 284.55' V S 15° 02' 25" E CONTOUR 49 55 24x36 X 24x36 CHORD BEARING: N 10° 37' 47" W 48" 21 V V 7.58' FP 22 Xref-Phase-1-Parking-Blk 43.55 FP .90' CHORD LENGTH: 284.10' FP V ELEVATION SPOT SHOT 25.50 T.C. 25.15 108 47" W 20 Xref-Phase-2-Parking-Blk 25.00 B.C. 23 34' BENCH MARK X N/A 18' 18' 24' 18' 52° 24x36 24x36 22 S PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 10 48" 24" 23 X FP AC CENTERLINE FP 24 FP 5' LIGHT POLE FP 24 25 74.9 24x36 24x36 18 9 X N/A .85' CONSTRUCTION NOTE 26 48" 15' REAR YARD FP 183 EX. 18"S 10 1 21 FP SETBACK LINE X 27 FP 25 TWO STORY 1 2 S 15° 02' 25" E 24x36 FP 24x36 BRICK 1 BUILDING 13 4 FP X LANDS N/F 2,743 SQ. FT. 1 5 RADIUS: 1462.69' 1 6 CITY OF DOVER 1 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5700-00001 10 17 8 X 24x36 ARC LENGTH: 462.51' 22 24x36 DEED REF.: 5011-0121 CHORD BEARING: N 7° 08' 39" W 26 1 9 FP 1 ZONING - IO 20 1 CHORD LENGTH: 460.59' 48" FP X FP 2 2 PROPOSED 2 LANDS N/F 24x36 AC APPROXIMATE LOCATION 24x36 "S CONCRETE CURB (typ.) 23 X 70.00' . EX. 12 23 60" 24 OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN CITY OF DOVER ONE STORY 27 FRAME 25 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5000-00001 BUILDING 26 N 74° 57' 34" E FP X DEED REF.: T-0036-0203 N 24x36 28 1,112 SQ. FT. 27 170.01' FP ZONING - IO 24x36 71.52' 10 34 98.49' S 15° 02' 25" E X V 28 24 10 FP V X FP 24x36 24x36 V 24" PHASE 1 PARKING ADDITION 28 FP PROPOSED PARKING PROPERTY LINE TO BE V X 29 139,815 S.F. / 15,535 S.Y. LIGHT FIXTURE (typ.) EXTINGUISHED PER THE V FP FP CONSOLIDATION PLAN V 24x36 24x36 X 25 29 60" 25 30" 9' 26 18' FP 20' FRONT YARD X 30' SETBACK LINE 27 36OE 30 21 9 80.00' 24x36 24x36 30" OE OE OE PROJECT TITLE 36" X X X 10 X 11 BAYHEALTH 28 24" 18' 265 12 30" 31 ONE STORY 2 4 13 S8 RADIUS: 1462.69' 2 14 X 7° 2 POLE 9' 2 294 197 MEDICAL 29 245 24x36 24x36 X ARC LENGTH: 177.96' 26 31 BUILDING 15 2" E CHORD BEARING: N 1° 34' 16" W 1,440 SQ. FT. 26 2 16 N 73° 01' 53" E X 24' 17 28.34' X 78.4 EET CHORD LENGTH: 177.86' EXISTING ASPHALT 18 8' CENTER, INC X 30" PARKING AREA 15 19 40' 20 S 10 74 24x36 24x36 30 21 X 18' 22 °5 0' X SCULL PROPERTY 23 5 . W.V 24' 8" STR 38 34 6 "S . W.M 31 X. X E SITE DEVELOPMENT E 24 24x36 24x36 18' TWO STORY 26 X 20 MASTER PLAN KCR OT W FRAME BUILDING 25 X EX. 6"S 1,044 SQ. FT. X FP PROPOSED PROPOSED 24 3 TE 25 BAYHEALTH STAFF 24x36 2 FP 24x36 24' 25, IDE R X 32 CONCRETE CURB (typ.) EX. 6"S CONCRETE CURB (typ.) 23 4 30 29 2 PARKING LOT X 31 24' 32 28 EX. SIGN 25 X STA MIN IG 9' 27 FP FP 12" STEEL - MD - 7.13' 26 EXPANSION 27 18' OR HT O 24x36 24x36 X EX. 30" F.M. 26 4" PVC - MD - 2.01' FP 42 34 26 X 18 3.8 605 S. STATE STREET 9' 8 ART F W FP 8" PVC - MD - 5.55' 8" PVC - MD - 5.84' X 24x36 18' 4" PVC - MD - 1.66' 4" PVC - MD - 1.70' 4" PVC - MD - 2.34' 8" PVC - MD - 3.84' 13 SHED 18' ' X FP CITY OF DOVER 24x36 9 KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE A 8" PVC - MD - 3.53' SOU ERI 30" 33 FP AL Y 28 FP PROPOSED PARKING SHEET TITLE X TWO STORY 12"S 24' PROPOSED STUCCOPARKING 27' TH BUILDING LIGHT FIXTURE (typ.) 34 S 34 LIGHT FIXTURE (typ.) SITE PLAN 24x36 24x36 2,100 SQ. FT. G.M. EX. X 60 ° 35 FO 17 PHASE 2 EX. 10" WATER 26 FP X ' 27" 18' EXISTING ONE-STORY EX. 18"S 24x36 24x36 44 26 .P. 32 COVERED BRICK BUILDING R.C 33 .88' ENTRANCE X E TOTAL PARKING 24" 31 OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER 18' 184 17 EX. 24x36 30 10,800 S.F. ± - FOOTPRINT FP X 24x36 15' REAR YARD SPACES: 589 26 27" PHASE 1 EXISTING PARKING PHASE 2 PARKING ADDITION 29 PROPOSED 28 27 SETBACK LINE X EXISTING ASPHALT 26 27' ACCESSIBLE RAMP (typ.) TO BE PARKING REPAVED AREA 31,975 S.F. / 3,553 S.Y. 14 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES (2 VAN) 36,261 S.F. / 4,029 S.Y. GEN 24x36 24x36 28 X W.V. FP W.M. W.M. 17 27 13 18' X 24x36 32 32 32 10 9 24x36 27 AC 33 60" 33 X 29 32 W.V. 15' AC FP 0 20 40 80 EX. 8" W 28 W.V. X PROPOSED 31 ONE STORY LIGHT POLE 27 D. 9' 24x36 13 24x36 17 FRAME 30 30 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (typ.) 18' 176 E 29 31 BUILDING Do Not Explode - Select Scale SCALE: 1" = 40' X 34" 28 5,044 SQ. FT. F.H. .50' W.V. FP 32 AC 98 24x36 34' PROPOSED X 24x36 27 F.M. EX. 10" W 33 27 EXISTING CONCRETE CURB (typ.) ISSUE BLOCK SCULL TERRACE N 1° EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB 30" 32' 34 EX. 24" R.C.P. X 33 32 PARKING AREA EX. 26 N 78° 28' 32 "E X E 10' SIDE YARD FLOODPLAIN LINE FP X UTILITY POLE (typ.) EXISTING 24x36 24x36 25.33' WHEELCHAIR RAMP 37.87' OE SETBACK LINE OE OE OE 12 26 18 20 13 18' S 11° 54' 41" OE W.M . . F.H OE OE OE 121.55' 24x36 24x36 FCM FCM . W.V 18" FP 24" . W.V . W.V 1115.96' 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 S 72° 59' 55" W 10"S X 29 .P. 15 0 15 R.C 30 30 24x36 EX. 60 75 90 45 45 60 75 90 X 24x36 24" 75 60 75 60 45 45 30 30 20' WIDE KENT COUNTY 15 0 15 EX. FP 12 LANDS N/F W X . UTILITY EASEMENT .1 0" . . . CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS, DOVER, DELAWARE S 24x36 EX 18" 24x36 30 X MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 30 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5600-00001 EX. LAYER STATE: C-202 DEED REF.: Q-0020-0165 12 PROJECT NO.: 2019184-07 X ZONING - IO X X X FP 30 X DATE: 2020-09-04 24x36 24x36 30 X EX. 12" 29 R.C .P. 28 12 X SCALE: AS SHOWN 27 X OE 20' FP DRAWN BY: M.A.R. PROJ. MGR.: M.A.R. 24x36 24x36 X 12 X SHEET C-202 20' WIDE CITY OF DOVE R X 24" UTILITY EASEMENT 24x36 24x36 X 12 FP COPYRIGHT 2020 C-202 - BayHealth Scull Property - Phase 2 123 24x36 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2019\2019184-07\DWG\201918407-Site-C3d18.dwg, Sep 04, 2020 - 12:26pm 24x36

24x36 24x36 Item 7. UE X LEGEND FP ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED 24x36 24x36 12 X SANITARY GRAVITY SEWER LINE, EX. 10"S 10" S FP SIZE & FLOW DIRECTION FP X SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN, SIZE 24x36 24x36 LANDS N/F FP EX. 10" F.M. 12" F.M. 12 & FLOW DIRECTION FP 18 U.T. RICHARD J. KOSIOR U.T. & KATHLEEN P. KOSIOR FP SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (S.M.H.) X T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7100-00001 DEED REF.: 5045-0067 P LANDS N/F 24x36 LANDS N/F F MICHAEL GRANT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 24x36 MATHEW PERZA ZONING - R8 X EX. 15"S T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7101-00001 & RACHEL GRANT FP EX. 10" W 12" W 12 FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6500-00001 WATER MAIN & SIZE RCP DEED REF.: 8452-0199 EX. 48" ZONING - R8 DEED REF.: 9012-0298 FP ZONING - R8 FIRE HYDRANT F.H. F.H. ARCH I T E C TURE EX. 6"W X 24x36 24x36 EX. 15"S LANDS N/F WATER VALVE (W.V.) OR METER (W.M.) N 78° 25' 47 FP DENNIS J. GRIMM T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6400-00001 FP W.M. W.V. W.M. W.V. ENG I NE E R I NG " EEX. 48" RC X FCM DEED REF.: 5079-0078 LANDS N/F STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (S.D.M.H.) PFIP Dover, DE N 16° 12' ZONING - R8 KATHLEEN M. UNTERKOFLER 10" W 75.44' FP EX. 15"S 12 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6300-00001 24x36 STORM DRAIN LINE (CMP OR RCP) 24x36 X U.T. FP FP DEED REF.: IS-0026-0405 LANDS N/F LISA MARIE ROSSI 309 S. Governors Ave. ZONING - R8 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6200-00001 CATCH BASIN Dover, DE 19904 FP 343.96' EX. 12"S FP Ph. 302.734.7950 X FIR DEED REF.: 7048-0014 FP FP ZONING - R8 UTILITY POLE W/ OVERHEAD SERVICE 24x36 S X X OR ELECTRIC (TELEPHONE OR BOTH) FP Fax 302.734.7965 24x36 48.98' 68 V X 26.45' V X U.T. 18 17 16 15 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE °0 FP "S EX. 15 V FP FP X X X X UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC U.E. U.E. Salisbury, MD 14 6' X FP FH 18 EX V V FP X X FP FP X . 4 33 FP FP UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE U.T. U.T. 312 West Main St. Suite 300 24x36 8" "E FP FP 24x36 SCM 12 FP RC FP UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN EX. 2" G 2" G Salisbury, MD 21801 P FP EX. 15"S X W.V FP Ph. 410.546.9100 V V . FIR FP FP OE OE PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED N/A 188 OE OE OE Fax 410.546.5824 1 OE OE X 112 OE OE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER OE OE OE Wilmington, NC 24x36 24x36 2 OE OE OE OE OE OE V LANDS N/F OE OE PHASE 3 ENTRANCE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SLAB / PAVING 13 MOLLY B. PHILLIPS APPROXIMATE LOCATION FP 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 X EX. 8"S FP FP W.V 38' 11 12 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6100-00001 . 12,195 S.F. 24" / 1,355 S.Y. OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN V 7. DEED REF.: 7372-0173 IMPERVIOUS SURFACED ROAD, DRIVE Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 W.V W 24" 30" 14 12 ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F OR LOT FP 24x36 EX. 8"W . 13 16 FP Ph. 910.341.7600 .V. 24x36 24" DONALD L. HENRY X . 15 14 FP ' T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6000-00001 INDIVIDUAL TREE OR BUSH N/A UT W.V UT 15 FP V DEED REF.: 5775-0149 EVERGREEN DECIDUOUS Fax 910.341.7506 16 36" 16 N 87 ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F X X X ° 59' WIRE FENCE X X X www.beckermorgan.com X GIA DOWNTOWN FP FP V 32" E PROPERTIES, LLC CHAINLINK FENCE FP 17 18 19 17 V 96" 24x36 19 24x36 FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-5901-00001 X STOCKADE FENCE 18 DEED REF.: 8444-0331 OE V 5 FP ZONING - R8 FP STRUCTURE (CONCRETE, WOOD, 19 FP V 152. FP METAL, ETC.) 24x36 U.T. 09' X FP 24x36 FP N 77° 42' 04" EX. 12"S U.T. V 20 20 V E DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE V 50.03' EMBANKMENT SIDESLOPES (DOWN) RADIUS: 1462.69' 21 ARC LENGTH: 284.55' V S 15° 02' 25" E CONTOUR 49 55 24x36 X 24x36 CHORD BEARING: N 10° 37' 47" W 48" 21 V V 7.58' FP 22 Xref-Phase-1-Parking-Blk 43.55 FP .90' CHORD LENGTH: 284.10' FP V ELEVATION SPOT SHOT 25.50 T.C. 25.15 108 47" W 20 Xref-Phase-2-Parking-Blk 25.00 B.C. 23 Xref-Phase-3-Parking-Blk 34' BENCH MARK X N/A 18' 18' 24' 18' 52° 24x36 24x36 22 S PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 10 48" 24" 23 X FP AC CENTERLINE FP 24 FP 5' LIGHT POLE FP 24 25 74.9 24x36 24x36 18 9 X N/A .85' CONSTRUCTION NOTE 26 48" 15' REAR YARD FP 183 EX. 18"S 10 1 21 FP SETBACK LINE X 27 FP 25 TWO STORY 1 2 S 15° 02' 25" E 24x36 FP 24x36 BRICK 1 BUILDING 13 4 FP X LANDS N/F 2,743 SQ. FT. 1 5 RADIUS: 1462.69' 1 6 CITY OF DOVER 1 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5700-00001 10 6 17 8 X 24x36 ARC LENGTH: 462.51' 22 24x36 DEED REF.: 5011-0121 CHORD BEARING: N 7° 08' 39" W 26 1 9 FP 1 ZONING - IO 20 1 CHORD LENGTH: 460.59' 48" FP X FP 2 2 PROPOSED 2 LANDS N/F 24x36 AC APPROXIMATE LOCATION 24x36 "S CONCRETE CURB (typ.) 23 X 70.00' . EX. 12 23 60" 24 OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN CITY OF DOVER ONE STORY 27 FRAME 25 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5000-00001 BUILDING 26 N 74° 57' 34" E FP X DEED REF.: T-0036-0203 N 24x36 28 1,112 SQ. FT. 27 170.01' FP ZONING - IO 24x36 71.52' 10 34 98.49' S 15° 02' 25" E X V 28 24 10 FP V X FP 24x36 24x36 V 24" PHASE 1 PARKING ADDITION 28 FP PROPOSED PARKING PROPERTY LINE TO BE V X 29 139,815 S.F. / 15,535 S.Y. LIGHT FIXTURE (typ.) EXTINGUISHED PER THE V FP FP CONSOLIDATION PLAN V 24x36 24x36 X 25 29 60" 25 30" 9' 26 18' FP 20' FRONT YARD X 30' SETBACK LINE 27 36OE 30 21 9 80.00' 24x36 24x36 30" OE OE OE PROJECT TITLE 36" X X X 10 X 11 BAYHEALTH 28 24" 18' 265 12 30" 31 ONE STORY 2 4 13 S8 RADIUS: 1462.69' 2 14 X 7° 2 POLE 9' 2 290 294 197 MEDICAL 29 245 24x36 24x36 X ARC LENGTH: 177.96' 26 31 BUILDING 15 2" E CHORD BEARING: N 1° 34' 16" W 1,440 SQ. FT. 26 2 16 N 73° 01' 53" E X 24' 17 28.34' X 78.4 EET CHORD LENGTH: 177.86' EXISTING ASPHALT 18 8' CENTER, INC X 30" PARKING AREA 15 19 40' 20 S 10 74 24x36 24x36 30 21 X 18' 22 °5 0' X SCULL PROPERTY 23 5 . W.V 24' 8" STR 38 34 6 "S . W.M 31 X. X E SITE DEVELOPMENT E 24 24x36 24x36 18' TWO STORY 26 X 20 MASTER PLAN KCR OT W FRAME BUILDING 25 X EX. 6"S 1,044 SQ. FT. X FP PROPOSED PROPOSED 24 3 TE 25 BAYHEALTH STAFF 24x36 2 FP 24x36 24' 25, IDE R X 32 CONCRETE CURB (typ.) EX. 6"S CONCRETE CURB (typ.) 23 4 30 29 2 PARKING LOT X 31 24' 32 28 EX. SIGN 25 X STA MIN IG 9' 27 FP FP 12" STEEL - MD - 7.13' 26 EXPANSION 27 18' OR HT O 24x36 24x36 X EX. 30" F.M. 26 4" PVC - MD - 2.01' FP 42 34 26 X 18 3.8 605 S. STATE STREET 9' 9' 8 ART F W FP 8" PVC - MD - 5.55' 8" PVC - MD - 5.84' X 24x36 18' 4" PVC - MD - 1.66' 4" PVC - MD - 1.70' 19 4" PVC - MD - 2.34' 8" PVC - MD - 3.84' 18' 13 SHED 18' ' X FP CITY OF DOVER 24x36 9 KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE A 8" PVC - MD - 3.53' SOU ERI 30" 33 FP AL Y 28 FP PROPOSED PARKING SHEET TITLE PHASE 3 PARKING ADDITION X TWO STORY 12"S 24' PROPOSED STUCCOPARKING 27' 27' TH BUILDING LIGHT FIXTURE (typ.) 34 S 34 SITE PLAN LIGHT FIXTURE (typ.) 30,780 S.F. / 3,420 S.Y. 24x36 24x36 2,100 SQ. FT. G.M. EX. X 60 ° 35 FO 17 PHASE 3 EX. 10" WATER 26 FP X ' 27" 18' 18' EXISTING ONE-STORY EX. 18"S 24x36 24x36 44 38 26 .P. 32 COVERED BRICK BUILDING R.C 33 .88' ENTRANCE X E TOTAL PARKING 24" 31 OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER 18' 18' 184 17 EX. 24x36 30 10,800 S.F. ± - FOOTPRINT FP X 24x36 15' REAR YARD SPACES: 680 26 193 27" PHASE 1 EXISTING PARKING PHASE 2 PARKING ADDITION 29 PROPOSED 28 27 SETBACK LINE X EXISTING ASPHALT 26 PROPOSED 27' 27' ACCESSIBLE RAMP (typ.) TO BE PARKING REPAVED 31,975 S.F. / 3,553 S.Y. 14 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES (2 VAN) AREA CONCRETE CURB (typ.) GEN 36,261 S.F. / 4,029 S.Y. 24x36 24x36 28 X W.V. FP W.M. W.M. 17 27 19 18' 13 18' X 24x36 32 32 32 10 9 24x36 27 AC 33 60" 33 X 29 32 15' W.V. 15' AC FP 0 20 40 80 EX. 8" W 28 W.V. X PROPOSED 31 ONE STORY LIGHT POLE 9' 27 D. 9' 24x36 19 13 24x36 17 FRAME 30 30 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (typ.) 18' 18' 176 E 29 31 BUILDING Do Not Explode - Select Scale SCALE: 1" = 40' X 34" 28 5,044 SQ. FT. F.H. .50' W.V. FP 32 PROPOSED PARKING AC 98 24x36 34' PROPOSED X 24x36 27 32'.M. EX. 10" W 33 27 LIGHT FIXTURE EXISTING (typ.) CONCRETE CURB (typ.) ISSUE BLOCK SCULL TERRACE 32' F N 1° EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB 30" 34 EX. 24" R.C.P. X 33 32 PARKING AREA EX. 26 N 78° 28' 32 "E X E 10' SIDE YARD FLOODPLAIN LINE FP X UTILITY POLE (typ.) EXISTING 24x36 24x36 25.33' WHEELCHAIR RAMP 37.87' OE SETBACK LINE OE OE OE 12 26 18 2020 18' 13 18' S 11° 54' 41" OE W.M . . F.H OE OE OE 121.55' 24x36 24x36 FCM FCM . W.V 18" FP 24" . W.V . W.V 1115.96' 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 S 72° 59' 55" W 10"S X 29 .P. 15 0 15 R.C 30 30 24x36 EX. 60 75 90 45 45 60 75 90 X 24x36 24" 75 60 75 60 45 45 30 30 20' WIDE KENT COUNTY 15 0 15 EX. FP 12 LANDS N/F W X . UTILITY EASEMENT .1 0" . . . CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS, DOVER, DELAWARE S 24x36 EX 18" 24x36 30 X MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 30 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5600-00001 EX. LAYER STATE: C-203 DEED REF.: Q-0020-0165 12 PROJECT NO.: 2019184-07 X ZONING - IO X X X FP 30 X DATE: 2020-09-04 24x36 24x36 30 X EX. 12" 29 R.C .P. 28 12 X SCALE: AS SHOWN 27 X OE 20' FP DRAWN BY: M.A.R. PROJ. MGR.: M.A.R. 24x36 24x36 X 12 X SHEET C-203 20' WIDE CITY OF DOVE R X 24" UTILITY EASEMENT 24x36 24x36 X 12 FP COPYRIGHT 2020 C-203 - BayHealth Scull Property - Phase 3 124 24x36 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2019\2019184-07\DWG\201918407-Site-C3d18.dwg, Sep 04, 2020 - 12:27pm 24x36

FP Item 7. ZONING - R8 FP LANDS N/F DENNIS J. GRIMM T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6400-00001 FCM EX. 48" RC FP DEED REF.: 5079-0078 PFIP LANDS N/F ZONING - R8 KATHLEEN M. UNTERKOFLER T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6300-00001 FP LANDS N/F ET DEED REF.: IS-0026-0405 FP ZONING - R8 LISA MARIE ROSSI TRE R S FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6200-00001 E WAT FP FP FIR FP DEED REF.: 7048-0014 ZONING - R8 18 17 FP V V 16 15 V FP FP 18 14 V FP EX FP FP . 4 FP 8" FP FP 12 FP FIP RC FP P FP FIR V FP FP OE OE V 188 OE OE 1 OE OE 112 2 OE OE OE OE ARCH I T E C TURE V LANDS N/F SITE 13 MOLLY B. PHILLIPS FP 1 11 FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6100-00001 FP ENG I NE E R I NG SOUTH GOVERN DEED REF.: 7372-0173 14 Y 24" FP 132 24" 30" ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F DONALD L. HENRY HWA Dover, DE 24" 15 1 14 V FP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6000-00001 165 DEED REF.: 5775-0149 SOUTH STATE STREET 16 36" FP ZONING - R8 LANDS N/F HIG ORS AVENUE 17 V GIA DOWNTOWN PROPERTIES, LLC FP FP 309 S. Governors Ave. 17 1819 96" V Dover, DE 19904 C-PR-L-TREE-AR 19 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-5901-00001 NT 18 FP DEED REF.: 8444-0331 UPO Ph. 302.734.7950 5 ZONING - R8 FP V C-PR-L-TREE-AR FIP 19 FP FP Fax 302.734.7965 V SOU Salisbury, MD C-PR-L-TREE-CV FP TH 20 20 V FP 21 V D C-PR-L-TREE-AR V 312 West Main St. Suite 300 48" 22 C-PR-L-TREE-C V 21 FP Xref-Phase-1-Parking-Blk FCM V Salisbury, MD 21801 V 20 Xref-Phase-2-Parking-Blk Xref-Phase-3-Parking-Blk Ph. 410.546.9100 23 FP FP Fax 410.546.5824 LOCATION MAP C-PR-L-TREE-AR 22 FP SCALE : 1" = 1,000' 10 Wilmington, NC 24" 48" AC 23 24 24 25 FP FP 3205 Randall Parkway, Suite 211 C-PR-L-TREE-AR 18 9 26 SITE DATA Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 EX. 18"S FP Ph. 910.341.7600 48" FP 1011 21 25 27 FP 1. OWNER OF RECORD : KGH DEVELOPMENT CORP. TWO STORY Fax 910.341.7506 12 FP BRICK (DEVELOPER) 625 SOUTH STATE STREET BUILDING 13 4 1 5 LANDS N/F DOVER, DE 19901 www.beckermorgan.com C-PR-L-TREE-AR 2,743 SQ. FT. 1 6 CITY OF DOVER 302-744-7027 1 C-PR-L-TREE-CV 17 8 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5700-00001 22 6 10 1 9 FP DEED REF.: 5011-0121 2. ENGINEER : BECKER MORGAN GROUP INC. 26 1 20 C-PR-L-TREE-C V ZONING - IO 309 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVE. C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-C FP V V 48" DOVER, DE 19904 AC 21 2 2 LANDS N/F 302-734-7950 2 2 3 CITY OF DOVER 3. PROPERTY MAP NUMBER : ED-05-077.13-01-51.00 254 23 60" ONE STORY FP 27 FRAME T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5000-00001 2 FP DEED REF.: T-0036-0203 BUILDING 276 4. ZONING CLASSIFICATION : IO - INSTITUTIONAL AND OFFICE (CITY OF DOVER) C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C ZONING - IO V 28 1,112 SQ. FT. SWPOZ TIER 1 AND 3 - SOURCE WATER PROTECTION OVERLAY ZONE 10 34 V 5. USE : EXISTING : OFFICE BUILDINGS AND DAYCARE CENTER 28 24 10 FP FP PROPOSED : PARKING LOT EXPANSION V C-PR-L-TREE-CV 6. TOTAL SITE AREA : 11.43 ACRES ± / 497,676.5 S.F. ± C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C V 24" V 28 29 FP V FP GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES : 25 29 V 25 60" 30" FP 1. QUALITY AND SIZE OF PLANTS, SPREAD OF ROOTS, AND SIZE OF BALLS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-CV V C-PR-L-TREE-CV 26 C-PR-L-TREE-CV FIP CURRENT STANDARDS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN "AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR 30" 27 OE C-PR-L-TREE-C V X OE X 36 OE 30 21 9 10 NURSERY STOCK." 36" 24" 11 28 265 12 31 24 13 C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-CV V 30" ONE STORY 2. EVERGREEN TREES SHALL HAVE A FULL, WELL-BRANCHED, CONICAL FORM TYPICAL OF THE SPECIES. C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C V POLE 2 14 290 294 197 245 29 15 26 31 BUILDING 1,440 SQ. FT. 226 16 17 3. ALL DECIDUOUS SHADE TREES SHALL BRANCH A MINIMUM OF 7'-0" ABOVE GROUND LEVEL. TREES SHALL BE 30" ET 15 18 19 20 PLANTED AND STAKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAIL SHOWN. 10 30 21 STR 4. PLANT MATERIALS DELIVERED TO THE SITE IN UNCOVERED TRUCKS WILL BE REJECTED. C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-CV 22 V C-PR-L-TREE-C V 23 38 34 "S E 31 .6 24E X 5. UNACCEPTABLE PLANT MATERIALS: MATERIALS WHICH HAVE DAMAGED OR CROOKED LEADERS, DEFORMED TWO STORY 26 GROWTH HABIT, ABRASIONS OF THE BARK, SUN SCALD, WINDBURN, DISFIGURING NOT COMPLETELY CALLUSED 20 60 C-PR-L-TREE-C V FRAME BUILDING 25 WILL BE REJECTED. IN ADDITION, TREES HAVING THEIR CENTRAL LEADERS HEADED BACK WILL ALSO BE C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-CV V EX. 6"S 1,044 SQ. FT. 28 FO 2423 FP REJECTED. PLANTS WITH LOOSE OR CRACKED ROOT BALL OR CONTAINERS WILL BE REJECTED. 25 TE KCR OT W 32 EX. 6"S 23 4 FP FP 30 29 2 6. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED IN TOPSOIL THAT IS THOROUGHLY WATERED AND TAMPED AS BACKFILLING 31 C-PR-L-TREE-CV 32 28 25, IDE R 25 PROGRESSES. NOTHING BUT SUITABLE TOPSOIL, FREE OF DRY SOD, STIFF CLAY, LITTER, STONES IN EXCESS OF STA 27 26 C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-CV V ONE (1) INCH DIAMETER, ETC. SHALL BE USED FOR PLANTING. C-PR-L-TREE-CV 12" STEEL - MD - 7.13' C-PR-L-TREE-CV 26 EX. 30" F.M. FP 4" PVC - MD - 2.01' MIN IG 42 34 27 FP OR HT O 26 7. MULCH FOR PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON 8" PVC - MD - 5.84' 8" PVC - MD - 5.55' FP 4" PVC - MD - 1.66' 4" PVC - MD - 1.70' 19 4" PVC - MD - 2.34' 13 THE PLANS AND SHALL HAVE NO LEAVES, YOUNG GREEN GROWTH, BRANCHES, TWIGS, GREATER IN DIAMETER ART F W 8" PVC - MD - 3.84' C-PR-L-TREE-C 9 V 8" PVC - MD - 3.53' C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C OF ½", WEEDS, SHAVINGS OR FOREIGN MATERIAL SUCH AS STONES, ETC. SHALL BE MIXED WITH THE MULCH. V V V FP TH 30" 33 A ALL SHRUB MASSES SHALL BE PLANTED IN CONTINUOUS MULCHED BEDS WITH A LIGHTLY COMPACTED DEPTH ERI AL Y TWO STORY STUCCO BUILDING FP OF THREE (3) INCHES. ALL CONTAINER PLANTS ARE TO HAVE ROOTS CUT ON FOUR SIDES AND/ OR SPREAD OUT 34 SOU 2,100 SQ. FT. G.M. IN NEW SOIL MIXTURE. C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C V 17 C-PR-L-TREE-C V C-PR-L-TREE-CV 26 C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C V 8. ALL AREAS NOT STABILIZED IN PAVING OR PLANT MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEEDED AND MULCHED. (SEE EROSION EXISTING ONE-STORY EX. 18"S & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND NOTES.) 44 33 32 COVERED ENTRANCE BRICK 38 BUILDING 26 FP 31 OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER PROJECT TITLE 9. LANDSCAPE BEDS NOT DEFINED BY CURBS, SIDEWALKS, WALLS OR OTHER STRUCTURES SHALL BE ENCLOSED C-PR-L-TREE-CV 30 17 10,800 S.F. ± - FOOTPRINT BY ALUMINUM EDGING UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. BAYHEALTH C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-CV V V V 26 193 27" 29 28 27 26 FP 10. AREAS DISTURBED BY LANDSCAPE OPERATIONS SHALL BE GRADED TO MATCH EXISTING TOPSOIL AND SEED OR MEDICAL GEN SOD AS REQUIRED. 28 W.M. W.V. W.M. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES AND MAY MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN CENTER, INC 17 27 19 13 C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-CV V C-PR-L-TREE-C V C-PR-L-TREE-C C-PR-L-TREE-CV 10 9 V 32 SPACING AND/OR LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIALS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY "AS BUILT" LOCATION OF ALL 32 32 33 60" 33 27 AC UTILITIES. 29 FP ST. JONES RIVER 32 C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR AC SCULL PROPERTY W.V. C-PR-L-TREE-AR 28 LANDSCAPE 12. NO PLANT, EXCEPT GROUNDCOVER, SHALL BE WITHIN THREE (3) FEET FROM SIDEWALKS. C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR W.V. 31 ONE STORY 30 27 D. PROJECT 17 19 13FRAME SITE DEVELOPMENT 30 29 BUILDING 13. NO TREE SHALL BE PLANTED CLOSER THAN TEN (10) FEET FROM ANY STRUCTURE OR BUILDING. 31 28 C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-C V C-PR-L-TREE-CV 5,044 SQ. FT. C-PR-L-TREE-CV AREA F.H. W.V. 32 FP 14. NO TREE SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN TEN (10) FEET OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR FIRE HYDRANTS. MASTER PLAN 98 AC 27 .M. 33 27 SCULL TERRACE 30" F 34 33 32 EX. 26 15. ONLY TREES THAT REACH A HEIGHT AND SIZE AT MATURITY OF SMALL TO MEDIUM SHALL BE PLANTED UNDER POWER LINES. BAYHEALTH STAFF OE OE OE C-PR-L-TREE-CV OE 12 C-PR-L-TREE-CV 18 C-PR-L-TREE-CV C-PR-L-TREE-CV 2020 C-PR-L-TREE-C V 13 C-PR-L-TREE-CV FP 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER ALL PLANTS THOROUGHLY TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24-HOUR PERIOD PARKING LOT 26 OE FCM OE OE OE FCM AFTER PLANTING, AND THEN WEEKLY OR MORE OFTEN, IF NECESSARY, DURING THE FIRST GROWING SEASON, UNLESS THE OWNER AGREES TO MAINTAIN AND WATER THEM. EXPANSION 18" 605 S. STATE STREET C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR 24" 17. TREES TO REMAIN ON-SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH SNOW FENCE DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE DETAIL). CITY OF DOVER 29 60 45 30 15 0 15 30 45 60 FP SNOW FENCING TO BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION BY CONTRACTOR. KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE 75 75 90 90 75 75 60 60 45 45 30 30 15 0 15 18. THE PLANTING PLAN SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANT SCHEDULE SHOULD ANY PLANT QUANTITY LANDS N/F DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. SHEET TITLE CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS, DOVER, DELAWARE S 18" 30 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5600-00001 CONCEPT EX. 30 DEED REF.: Q-0020-0165 19. NO SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND/ OR THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ZONING - IO FP AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF DOVER PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. LANDSCAPE 30 30 29 2 278 20. ALL NEW TREES SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO SURVIVE FOR ONE FULL YEAR AFTER INSTALLATION (FULL COST). ALL STAKES AND GUYS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM TREES AND SITE AS EARLY AS THREE (3) MONTHS, BUT NO MASTER PLAN OE LONGER THAN ONE (1) YEAR AFTER PLANTING. TREE PRESERVATION & DENSITY REQUIREMENTS NOTE: 1. 2. EXISTING WOODLAND AREA : TOTAL PRESERVED WOODLANDS : N/A N/A PHASE 3 DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY 3. TOTAL NON-WOODLAND PROJECT AREA : 6.40 ACRES / 278,779 S.F. CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANT 4. DENSITY : 1 TREE PER 3,000 S.F. OF NON-WOODLAND AREA LEADERS, AND BROKEN OR DEAD 317,158.4 S.F. / 1 TREE PER 3000 S.F. = 105.7 TREES 106 TREES REQUIRED BRANCHES. SOME INTERIOR 5. EXISTING TREES TO BE RETAINED : 14 TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED; HOWEVER, DO 6. PROPOSED TREES FOR PROJECT AREA : 122 NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL BUDS TOTAL TREES PROVIDED 136 0 25 50 100 OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE CROWN. DELAWARE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS CERTIFICATION SCALE : 1" = 50' SET ROOT BALL 2" ABOVE CANVAS WEBBING OR I, CHAD D. CARTER, RLA, ASLA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A GRADE. REMOVE EXCESS SOIL ON TOP OF THE PLASTIC HORTICULTURAL TAPE. DO NOT STRETCH. LEGEND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE, THAT THE LANDSCAPING INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON HAS BEEN PREPARED ISSUE BLOCK BALL, JUST EXPOSING UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND TO MY BEST KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THE ROOT FLARE. REPRESENTS GOOD LANDSCAPING PRACTICES. SET ROOT BALL 2" ABOVE CANVAS WEBBING OR EXISTING TREES GRADE. REMOVE EXCESS PLASTIC HORTICULTURAL TO BE RETAINED SOIL ON TOP OF THE TAPE. DO NOT STRETCH. BALL, JUST EXPOSING MULCH - PLACE 3" 2"x2" WOODEN THE ROOT FLARE. LAYER OF SPECIFIED STAKES. DRIVE DRIP LINE DRIP LINE MULCH. DO NOT PLACE SECURELY INTO IN CONTACT WITH TREE GROUND. 3 PER EXISTING TREES TRUNK. KEEP MULCH TREE. WEEDED AND REPLACE MULCH - PLACE 3" 2"x2" WOODEN TO BE REMOVED AS NEEDED. FINISHED LAYER OF SPECIFIED STAKES. DRIVE MULCH. DO NOT PLACE SECURELY INTO NO ENTRANCE INTO CHAD D. CARTER, RLA, ASLA S1-499 DATE GRADE ROOT ZONE BY YELLOW SAFETY IN CONTACT WITH TREE GROUND. 3 PER TRUNK. KEEP MULCH TREE. MACHINERY, PARKING RIBBON AND SILT WEEDED AND REPLACE OR MATERIALS FENCE AROUND TREES AS NEEDED. FINISHED STORAGE PR. CANOPY TREE GRADE MARK DATE DESCRIPTION C-PR-L-TREE-AR METAL POSTS LAYER STATE : L-101 PROJECT NO.: 2019184.07 REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP. SOIL MIXTURE - CONSISTING OF DATE: 2020-09-04 CUT & REMOVE ALL STRAPPING, 1/4 HUMUS AND 3/4 TOPSOIL PR. FLOWERING TREE SCALE: 1" = 50' C-PR-L-TREE-CV ROPES, AND WIRE CAGES. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP. SOIL MIXTURE - CONSISTING OF CUT & REMOVE ALL STRAPPING, 1/4 HUMUS AND 3/4 TOPSOIL NOTE : UNDISTURBED SOIL ROPES, AND WIRE CAGES. DRAWN BY: C.D.C. PROJ. MGR.: M.A.R. SILT FENCE OR TREE PRESERVATION FENCE TO BE PLACED AROUND UNDISTURBED SOIL LIMITS OF CLEARING SHEET PR. EVERGREEN TREE DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL TREE PROTECTION DETAIL NO SCALE BMG NO. : L-01 EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL NO SCALE BMG NO. : L-02 NO SCALE BMG NO. : L-02 L-101 COPYRIGHT 2013 125 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2019\2019184-07\DWG\201918407-LSCAPE-C3d18.dwg, Sep 04, 2020 - 11:03am

24x36 24x36 Item 7. 24x36 24x36 ET TRE E R S 24x36 LANDS N/F WAT 24x36 MATHEW PERZA LANDS N/F T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7101-00001 RICHARD J. KOSIOR DEED REF.: 8452-0199 & KATHLEEN P. KOSIOR LANDS N/F 24x36 ZONING - R8 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-7100-00001 MICHAEL GRANT 24x36 N 78° 25' 47 DEED REF.: 5045-0067 & RACHEL GRANT "E ZONING - R8 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6500-00001 LANDS N/F LANDS N/F FCM FIP DEED REF.: 9012-0298 DENNIS J. GRIMM KATHLEEN M. UNTERKOFLER T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6400-00001 75.44' ARCH I T E C TURE ZONING - R8 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6300-00001 26.45' DEED REF.: 5079-0078 DEED REF.: IS-0026-0405 SITE 24x36 24x36 ZONING - R8 ZONING - R8 ENG I NE E R I NG S AVENUE FIR 343.96' IGH KERBIN STREET 338.05' WAY Dover, DE N 16° 12' 10" W SIRC S SOUTH STATE STREET 68 24x36 24x36 °0 T H 309 S. Governors Ave. T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-5901-00001 LLC 6' Dover, DE 19904 SOUTH GOVERN 48.98' 33 LANDS N/F LANDS N/F UPO Ph. 302.734.7950 "E LISA MARIE ROSSI N KGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION GIA DOWNTOWN PROPERTIES, FIP T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6200-00001 Fax 302.734.7965 OR 24x36 24x36 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5100-00001 S 78° 48' 37 SOU "W 1 FIR DEED REF.: 7048-0014 T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6000-00001 DEED REF.: S-0039-0127 1 Salisbury, MD TH 8. 10 ZONING - R8 D SIRC ' DEED REF.: 8444-0331 19,389 S.F.± 312 West Main St. Suite 300 DUSTIN H. WOOD 24x36 24x36 LANDS N/F Salisbury, MD 21801 SOUTH STREET LANDS N/F DEED REF.: 5775-0149 MOLLY B. PHILLIPS Ph. 410.546.9100 LANDS N/F 12 Fax 410.546.5824 7. T.P.: 2-05-07709-05-6100-00001 LOCATION MAP ZONING - R8 16' DEED REF.: 7372-0173 SCALE : 1" = 1,000' Wilmington, NC 24x36 24x36 PROPERTY LINE TO BE ZONING - R8 ZONING - R8 EXTINGUISHED PER THIS PLAN N 87 ° 59' 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 1938 32" E N 65 °5 SITE DATA Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 0.45 9 S.F Ph. 910.341.7600 24x36 24x36 3' TE ST 23 1. OWNER OF RECORD: BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, INC "W FIP 640 SOUTH STATE STREET Fax 910.341.7506 AC. .± N: 420009.82 115. 52' 152.0 9' E: 626824.76 DOVER, DE 19901 www.beckermorgan.com ± KCR 25,WIDE RIGHT REET N 77° 42' 04" 24x36 24x36 2. ENGINEER / SURVEYOR: BECKER MORGAN GROUP INC. E SIRC 309 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVE. SIRC 50.03' DOVER, DELAWARE 19904 S 88 ° 31' 37" W S 15° 02' 25" E 302-734-7950 "W 24x36 24x36 7.58' N 16° 19' 35" W LANDS N/F FCM 34 ' 47 3. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 605 & 625 SOUTH STATE STREET .90' 2° 108 S5 DOVER, DE 19901 BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, INC 32.15' OF WAY RADIUS: 1462.69' ARC LENGTH:284.55' T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-4900-00001 4. TAX PARCEL NUMBERS: 2-05-07713-01-4900-00001 & 2-05-07713-01-5100-00001 3ACRES± DEED REF.: 0657-0020 24x36 24x36 3.45 .4 MINOR A CHD. BRG: N 10° 37' 47" W 5. DEED REFERENCE : D-657-20 & S-39-127 5 AC CHD. LENGTH: 284.10' STA EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE 6. SITE AREA SUMMARY: P. 49 3.45 ACRES± . ± 5' P. 51 7.98 ACRES± 74.9 RTERIAL 24x36 24x36 TOTAL AFTER CONSOLIDATION = 11.43 ACRES± .85' EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE 7. NUMBER OF LOTS: EXISTING: 2 183 PROPOSED: 1 70.00' S 15° 02' 25" E SOUTH 24x36 24x36 LANDS N/F LANDS N/F 8. ZONING CLASSIFICATION: IO - INSTITUTIONAL AND OFFICE 60 FOOT CITY OF DOVER CITY OF DOVER SWPOZ - SOURCE WATER PROTECTION OVERLAY ZONE T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5700-00001 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5000-00001 (PART OF PARCELS) DEED REF.: 5011-0121 DEED REF.: T-0036-0203 24x36 ZONING - IO ZONING - IO 9. SETBACKS: IO - INSTITUTIONAL AND OFFICE 24x36 STREET YARD: 10 FEET SIDE YARD: 10 FEET DSP REAR YARD: 15 FEET SIDE/REAR ADJOINING "R" ZONES: 30 FEET 83 / 24x36 24x36 RADIUS: 1462.69' 10. BULK STANDARDS: IO - INSTITUTIONAL AND OFFICE N 74° 57' 34" E ARC LENGTH: 462.51' CHD. BRG: N 7° 08' 39" W 170.01' MINIMUM AREA: MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 10,000 SQ. FT. 100 FEET .NAD 24x36 71.52' 24x36 CHD. LENGTH: 460.59' 98.49' MINIMUM DEPTH: 100 FEET S 15° 02' 25" E EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE BUILDING HEIGHT: 150 FEET/10 STORIES FLOOR AREA RATIO: 6.0 N N 16° 19' 35" W 24x36 MAX LOT COVERAGE: 85% 24x36 11. PRESENT USE: MEDICAL FACILITIES 12. ROAD CLASSIFICATION: SOUTH STATE STREET - MINOR ARTERIAL - 25 MPH 13. PROPERTY LOCATION: LATITUDE: N 39° 09' 08.66" GRS80 - NAD83 (2011) 24x36 24x36 N 73° 40' 25" E LONGITUDE: W 075° 31' 16.22" GRS80 - NAD83 (2011) 566.54' FIP 14. SURVEY DATUM: NGS MONUMENTS VERTICAL: NAVD 88 - DNREC 80.00' 24x36 24x36 HORIZONTAL: NAD 83 (2007) DSP - DNREC PROPERTY LINE TO BE EXTINGUISHED PER THIS PLAN SIRC S 87 15. MONUMENTATION: 8 FOUND / 7 SET TOT ° 29 ' 22 16. SURVEY CLASSIFICATION: SUBURBAN SURVEY AL - N 73° 01' 53" E "E 24x36 24x36 PROJECT TITLE 28.34' 78.4 11.4 8' S LANDS OF 7.53 3 AC 74 BAYHEALTH 24x36 24x36 °5 0' AC. RES 58 "E 24x36 ± ± MEDICAL 24x36 24x36 RADIUS: 1462.69' ARC LENGTH:177.96' CHD. BRG: N 1° 34' 16" W CENTER, INC 24x36 CHD. LENGTH: 177.86' 24x36 24x36 18 LANDS N/F 3.8 8' 24x36 KGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 24x36 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5100-00001 605 & 625 SOUTH STATE STREET DEED REF.: S-0039-0127 S 34 CITY OF DOVER 7.53 ACRES± KENT COUNTY, DE 24x36 24x36 SDH ° 35 .88' 184 ' 27" SHEET TITLE 24x36 24x36 E AREA AFTER CONSOLIDATION LOT 11.43 ACRES± CONSOLIDATION RIVE 24x36 24x36 PLAN R 24x36 24x36 ONES 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 0 20 40 80 ST. J 24x36 176 24x36 .50' Do Not Explode - Select Scale SCALE: 1" = 40' E 34" N 78° 28' 32 "E 37.87' 24x36 24x36 POB 34' ISSUE BLOCK N: 419257.99 E: 626242.16 N 1° 24x36 FCM FCM 121.55' S 11° 54' 41" E 24x36 SDH 1115.96' S 72° 59' 55" W 25.33' N: 419548.78 LANDS N/F E: 627193.12 CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS, DOVER, DELAWARE 24x36 24x36 T.P.: 2-05-07713-01-5600-00001 DEED REF.: Q-0020-0165 ZONING - IO 24x36 24x36 SURVEY LEGEND GENERAL NOTES : . C-1-NOTES-LEGEND-SURVEY ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED . . . 24x36 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO CONSOLIDATE PARCELS 2-05-07713-01-4900-00001 & 24x36 2-05-07713-01-5100-00001, IN TO ONE PARCEL. PARCELS OWNED BY BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, INC, MARK DATE DESCRIPTION UNMARKED POINT LAYER STATE: 24x36 AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN D.R. 1017-127 AS RECORDED IN THE KENT COUNTY CONCRETE MONUMENT FCM SCM SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION OWNERS CERTIFICATION RECORDER OF DEEDS. PROJECT NO.: 2019184.07 IRON PIPE FIP SIP 2. THE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS COMPILED FROM A FIELD SURVEY DATE: 08/27/2020 24x36 24x36 I, JEFFREY C. DODD, REGISTERED AS A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE, HEREBY WE, BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, INC. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE ARE THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY PERFORMED BY BECKER MORGAN GROUP, INC. , DOVER, DE. IN MARCH 2020 IRON PIPE W/ CAP FIPC STATE THAT THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, THAT THE PLAN WAS MADE AT OUR DIRECTION, AND THAT WE IRON ROD FIR SIR MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS ESTABLISHED BY THE STATE OF DELAWARE BOARD OF ACKNOWLEDGE THE SAME TO BE OUR ACT AND DESIRE THE PLAN TO BE DEVELOPED AS SHOWN IN 3. THE BOUNDARY LINES PORTRAYED HEREON HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BASED SOLELY ON PHYSICAL SCALE: 1" = 40' EVIDENCE DISCOVERED IN THE FIELD, IN CONJUNCTION WITH DETERMINATIONS DERIVED FROM SOURCE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS. ANY CHANGES TO THE PROPERTY CONDITIONS, IMPROVEMENTS, ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. IRON ROD W/ CAP FIRC SIRC OF TITLE AND ADJACENT DEED RECORD INFORMATION. DRAWN BY: J.H.K. PROJ. MGR.: J.C.D. 24x36 24x36 BOUNDARY OR PROPERTY CORNERS AFTER THE DATE SHOWN HEREON SHALL NECESSITATE A NEW REVIEW DRILL HOLE FDH SDH AND CERTIFICATION FOR ANY OFFICIAL OR LEGAL USE. 4. PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, ETC. AS SHEET MAY BE SHOWN OR NOTED IN ANY RECORD, PUBLIC OR OTHERWISE, OR ANY REQUIREMENT OR 1 OF 1 STONE FSTONE REGULATION OF ANY PUBLIC AGENCY. 24x36 24x36 PK NAIL FPK SPK 5. THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED WITHIN ZONE "X", AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD, BASED ON FIRM MAP JEFFREY C. DODD P.L.S.NO. 782 DATE BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, INC DATE FLOOD ELEVATION 9.0', BASED ON FIRM MAP 10001C0169J, PANEL 169, REVISED JULY 7, 2014. COPYRIGHT 2020 126 24x36 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2019\2019184-07\DWG\201918407-Consolidation Plan-C3D18.dwg, Aug 27, 2020 - 11:04am 24x36 2020-08-27