Skip to main content
AskDover

Transcript: Construction & Property Maintenance Code Board of Appeals Meeting

Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Machine transcript. Speaker names are machine-identified and can be wrong. Check the recording.

Showing 89 of 89 statements

City Staff

Okay, go ahead.

Play from 00:00

Andre M. Boggerty

Good afternoon. This is Andre, Councilman Andre Boggerty, chair of the City of Dover, Delaware, Construction & Property Maintenance Code Board of Appeals. Um, today is Wednesday, June 24th, uh, at 3:30, at 3:36, and, um, we are I have the agenda before you. Um, I make a motion that we approve the agenda.

Play from 00:01

Board Member

Can you move to, uh, approve the agenda?

Play from 00:24

Board Member 2

Second.

Play from 00:27

Andre M. Boggerty

It's been properly moved and seconded. Are you ready for the question? All those in favor, signify by saying aye.

Play from 00:29

Board Members

Aye.

Play from 00:33

Andre M. Boggerty

Aye. The motion is is, um, passes by, um, consent. Uh, what I will do also is due to the logistics of our of the of Daniel jump, no, uh, we will call a recess. Is that a recess, uh, until 3:45? 3:45 to allow Daniel Jones an attempt to join us as he is located indicated that he's located outside of the country. So, we will recess from 3:37 to 3:45, which would have given him a total of 15 minutes to join. We are now coming out of recess. As of this As at 3:45, the, um, Mr. Daniel Jones, the subject listed representative for this matter, uh, agenda item 2009 Property Maintenance Code violation, Chapter 22, Buildings and Building Regulations, Article 12, Vacant Buildings, Section 22-403, registration and

Play from 00:34

Speaker 1

registration fee, uh, appeal of registration fee, 7 Scioto Court, 7 Scioto Court. Court, again 7 Scioto Court, uh, with the representative listed as Daniel Jones has not uh, joined us either in person or virtually regarding this matter.

Play from 01:46

Charles Martin

Uh, yeah, Charles Martin. It's Daniel Noel.

Play from 02:08

Speaker 1

Daniel Noel. Okay. What did I say, Noel?

Play from 02:11

Female Speaker

Jones.

Play from 02:13

Speaker 1

Jones! [laughter] Daniel Noel Daniel Noel. I'm sorry, Daniel Jones. I don't know where I got that from. I apologize, I recant. It is Daniel Noel.

Play from 02:14

Female Speaker

Daniel Jones played basketball.

Play from 02:25

Charles Martin

All right. So, uh, I'll go ahead, uh, Charles Martin, that, uh, I went by the property today and there is a coming soon, uh, real estate sign on that from, uh, Keller Williams. And, uh, so I just spoke with the agent whose name is on that sign, and she has, uh, a signed listing agreement and is going to email that listing agreement to Mr. Kopp. Uh, I expect he will get it this afternoon. Um, I told her just as quick as she could to to email that. Um, so that's the latest that I know, and I don't know. Go ahead.

Play from 02:28

Speaker 1

owner being afforded the opportunity to appeal, and not being present during the appeal.

Play from 03:33

Andre M. Boggerty

Um, however, we now know that there may be a a contract to sell the home. If the owner was here, would that What impact would that have?

Play from 03:39

Speaker 1

Uh that would be determination of the board. Uh I think I think it would probably be in the board's best in- best interest to hear uh John England's notes. Uh there's a lengthy history with this property.

Play from 03:52

Speaker 3

You You want me to present my case, or...

Play from 04:01

Speaker 1

Well, I think, uh, based on past past practices with the board, it'd be the recommendation of code enforcement to deny the appeal based on, um, that

Play from 04:03

Andre M. Boggerty

I agree.

Play from 04:05

Speaker 1

Okay.

Play from 04:06

John England

Okay. Um, John England, code enforcement officer for the City of Dover for the last six years.

Play from 04:07

John England

Um, this case was uh generated back in April 21st, 2023 by Ron Coburn. At the time, he was the vacant building inspector.

Play from 04:14

John England

Um, he sent out a certified letter um in regards to the vacant property.

Play from 04:25

John England

Um, on May 8th, 2023, we were notified by Customer Service that the electric was terminated to that property. On May 23rd, 2023, a second notice um stating that the city was reg- registrating- registris- registrating the property, um and a $375 invoice was sent certified. On 5/25/2023, um Mr. Coburn posted return- the returned certified mail, so it never got delivered or picked up, so he posted it on the property. June 22nd, 2023, uh the fee was transferred over to Customer Service for taxes.

Play from 04:31

City Staff

June 23rd, um, 2023, Mr. Coburn again returned the second mailing, certified mail, on the property.

Play from 05:20

City Staff

On June 27th, 2023, um, it looks like Mr. Noel um, submitted his registration to Ron Coburn, um, and at that time, the fee was removed um, because the owner stated that he was active military and he was deployed.

Play from 05:31

City Staff

May 23rd, 2024 was the second year vacant building uh, fee and letter. That was $750, and it was sent certified.

Play from 05:52

City Staff

June 25th, 2024, the fee transferred to the customer service for taxes.

Play from 06:02

City Staff

May 23rd, 2025, third year vacant building letter and $1,500 invoice sent certified. The certified letter was signed on an unknown date.

Play from 06:08

City Staff

June 5th, 2025, the return certified mail um, got post- um, June 24th, 2025, the fee transfer to customer service for taxes. On August 5th, 2025, the utilities were terminated again to the property. On September 3rd, 2025, utilities were reinstated. On May 12th, 2026, this year, utilities were terminated again. On 5/26/2026, I sent out the fourth year vacant building letter and $3,000 invoice certified. On the same day, May 26th, 2026, the utilities were reinstated. And then on June 8th, 2026...

Play from 06:20

City Staff

I posted the return certified letter on the property. And then June 9th, 2026, we received an email, or I should say that the city clerk's office received an email requesting an appeal. Just a point of information, since the home was properly purchased by Mr. Noel on March 31st, 2022, we have logged 13 cases against his property. Um, they- they ranged from tall grass or weeds to exterior property maintenance, vacant building fees, electric service terminations, um, et cetera. Um, and that brings us up to date.

Play from 07:07

Board Member

I can add one thing, uh, just for the record. To the best of my knowledge, we have not received any confirmation and deployment orders or written correspondence by any means, um, to go along with what Mr. Noel is- is claiming. He's claiming he's a DoD contractor. Uh, based on my previous experience with the military is, um, if you're on deployment orders, it's just that. That's why there's the Servicemembers Relief Act, because you're forced to be there. Um, in my conversations with Mr. Noel, it seems like he's there on voluntary duty as a civilian contractor. Uh, so I- I just want to put that clarification out there. He's- this isn't deployment order where you can force to be there. It's my interpretation that he's there voluntarily and he's not, um, an active-duty service member. He's a DoD contractor. So. I wasn't the real military service.

Play from 07:53

Andre M. Boggerty

Armiger? Armstrong? Uh, Council President Neil.

Play from 08:54

Fred A. Neil

Uh, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, one, has he paid everything that has been billed?

Play from 08:59

City Staff

No. We have, um, most of his fees are still outstanding for, um, the numerous property maintenance cases with us.

Play from 09:06

Fred A. Neil

So nothing has been paid, or very little has been paid of this. And if he had an agent, he would not have this—not the sales agent, but an agent that's listed. I mean, I'm really saying this for the record because you guys know all this. He's a danger to the neighborhood. He's a danger as a magnet for addicts who will destroy the inside of the house and can burn it down. Right.

Play from 09:16

Fred A. Neil

So the reason for it is is important, and if he is a contractor for the government and not military that's on assignment, that represents an entirely different picture.

Play from 09:45

City Staff

And just for the record, most of these cases originated from complaints. So this these cases aren't, uh, inspector initiated or they're not coming from the Code Enforcement Office. Majority of these cases originated from other sources, um, as a complaint to the Division of Code Enforcement.

Play from 10:39

City Staff

the maintenance code. Unfortunately, based on the history of this property, it does not comply with the property maintenance code due to the repeated violations there. So, within the vacant building ordinance, you are required to maintain the property in accordance with all codes. This property has not met that requirement over the course of this

Play from 10:41

Fred A. Neil

So if if he we received this document that that this property is on sale, does that freeze, uh, any future damage or permit?

Play from 10:58

Board Member

Okay, I may direct this to Charles, who's a member of of this board. Would the sales agent be responsible for taking care of all those things on that property?

Play from 11:01

City Staff

So that's one aspect of it. According to the the vacant building ordinance, the property has to maintain utilities at all times and it has to, uh, maintain compliance with the property—

Play from 11:11

Charles Martin

Um, that sign has just gone up, so she has not been his agent for three years by any means. She's now the agent for that property owner.

Play from 11:12

Board Member

Yeah.

Play from 11:25

Charles Martin

And it's and it's going to be for sale. She said they're shooting for July the 2nd, I think is what she said.

Play from 11:27

City Staff

And just for clarification, correct me if I'm wrong, she would be specific to the sale of the property. She's not going to she's not going to take over any property maintenance things that would be there.

Play from 11:35

Charles Martin

No, that would be between her and the and the owner as to whether she was going to contract people to keep the grass cut. Uh, she said there was some work being done and she had taken over getting that work completed.

Play from 11:49

Board Member

But we would now have a lien on that property for the money he owes, is that correct?

Play from 12:06

Charles Martin

No.

Play from 12:11

City Staff

No. Um, the way the code is written currently, the only lien is vacant building fees and grass fees. Code enforcement citations are not lienable, uh, in the present code.

Play from 12:12

Board Member

So, Dover would be out of that money if it's sold?

Play from 12:24

Board Member

and the new owner would not have to pay that, and we don't get that money -- that we don't get the -- the fees or the fines back.

Play from 12:28

City Staff

Correct.

Play from 12:36

Board Member

Um... that's it. I yield. I yield.

Play from 12:37

Charles Wharton

Uh, Charles Wharton. Um, I thought I heard uh, just a minute ago as you were going through the history, about being referred to taxes or something.

Play from 12:41

City Staff

Yeah, so that's specific to vacant building fees and tall grass and weeds.

Play from 12:55

Charles Wharton

Okay.

Play from 13:02

City Staff

So, the...

Play from 13:03

Charles Wharton

...that's to his tax bill that he pays...

Play from 13:04

City Staff

Correct.

Play from 13:07

Charles Wharton

...when he pays his his city taxes.

Play from 13:08

City Staff

Yeah, that just those two specific cases, so it has to be either vacant building or weeds, unfortunately. Um, any property maintenance issue violations, so say there's abandoned cars, trash, broken fence, any citation we would issue for that, it doesn't get liened. Um, at the current moment, it I am reviewing, as always, all codes and ordinances. So, you know, just expect something forthcoming in the near future.

Play from 13:10

Staff Member

Since 2022 that's, that'd be significant. I don't have the actual number in front of me, but it's a significant, um, it's a significant number and it's due to the, the continued neglect of the property, unfortunately.

Play from 14:15

Charles Wharton

Good.

Play from 14:19

Dave Campana

Yeah, Dave Campana. Uh, so he's responsible for all the money he owes prior to this signed agreement, is that where we're at?

Play from 14:20

Chair

So we, so am I hearing that we want to deny the appeal?

Play from 14:30

City Staff

He's responsible, um, if the property were to sell right now...

Play from 14:31

Board Member 1

So moved.

Play from 14:34

Board Member 2

Second.

Play from 14:36

Dave Campana

Right.

Play from 14:36

Chair

Been properly moved and seconded. Are you ready for the question? All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Play from 14:37

City Staff

...he would only be responsible for the vacant building fees and the tall grass fees. So any other citation that was issued, unless it's captured at the time of sale, we cannot collect on it, basically.

Play from 14:37

Board Member 1

Aye.

Play from 14:42

Board Member 2

Aye.

Play from 14:43

Chair

All those opposed?

Play from 14:44

Martin

Aye.

Play from 14:45

Chair

Uh, three denies. Martin?

Play from 14:46

Martin

Opposed.

Play from 14:49

Chair

One opposed. And, um, so the appeal is denied.

Play from 14:50

Dave Campana

Okay.

Play from 14:51

City Staff

So, and out of 13 cases...

Play from 14:52

Chair

Um, I call for the adjournment of the Construction and Property Maintenance Code Board of Appeals.

Play from 14:58

Board Member 1

So moved.

Play from 15:03

Martin

Martin.

Play from 15:04

Board Member 2

Second.

Play from 15:06

Chair

Been properly moved and seconded. Ready for the question. All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Play from 15:07

Board Member 1

Aye.

Play from 15:10

Chair

Aye. By consent...

Play from 15:11
Something wrong? Report this transcript