Attachment

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Revised to Include a New Item #11-a-2-v JULY 14, 2014 - 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 15 LOOCKERMAN PLAZA DOVER, DELAWARE OPEN FORUM - 15 MINUTES PRIOR TO OFFICIAL MEETING (7:15 p.m.) The “Open Forum” segment is provided to extend the opportunity to the general public to share their questions, thoughts, comments, concerns, and complaints. Discussion of any item appearing on the agenda as a public hearing is prohibited during the Open Forum as an opportunity will be provided during consideration of that item. Citizen comments are limited to three (3) minutes. Council is prohibited from taking action since they are not in official session; however, they may schedule such items as regular agenda items and act upon them in the future. INVOCATION BY REVEREND THEODORE HENDERSON PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN HARE AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS * CONSENT AGENDA Those items on the Council Agenda which are considered routine and non-controversial shall be marked with an asterisk (*) and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. * 1. Adoption of Minutes A. Special Council Meeting of June 9, 2014 B. Regular Council Meeting of June 23, 2014 C. Special Council Meeting of June 25, 2014 2. Recognition of Service A. John J. Davis - Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee (June 2008 - May 2014) and Election Board (August 2013 - July 2014) B. Michael G. Rushe - Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee (May 2012 - June 2014)

Council Agenda - July 14, 2014 Page 2 3. Public Hearing/Final Reading of Proposed Ordinance #2014-08 With Staff Amendment #1 (SA-#1) Amending Appendix B - Zoning The First Reading of the Proposed Ordinance was accomplished during the Council meeting of May 27, 2014. Copies are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers. A. Proposed Ordinance #2014-08 with Staff Amendment #1 (SA#1) Amending Appendix B - Zoning - Article 3 - District Regulations - Section 10 - Institutional and Office Zone (IO); Section 11 - Neighborhood Commercial Zone (C-1); Section 12 - Limited Commercial Zone (C-1A); Section 13 - Central Commercial Zone (C-2); Section 14 - Limited Central Commercial Zone (C-2A); Section 15 - Service Commercial Zone (C-3); Section 16 - Highway Commercial Zone (C-4); Section 26 - Commercial/Professional Office Development District (C-PO); Article 4 - Zoning Bulk and Parking Regulations; Article 10 - Planning Commission; and Article 12 - Definitions (Planning Reference: MI-14-10) * 4. Dover Human Relations Commission Report - May 13, 2014 A. Presentation - DHRC and City of Dover Police Department Interaction (Police Chief Bernat) (Commission action not required) B. Scheduling of DHRC Workshop (The workshop was scheduled for Tuesday, July 8, 2014 at 5:00 p.m.) C. Discussion - City Council and DHRC District Orientation Meetings (Commission action not required) D. Discussion - Member ID Cards (Commission action not required) E. Update by Chairman Wilson - City Manager Department Head Meeting of April 29, 2014 (Commission action not required) F. Discussion of Future Quarterly Meeting Dates (Future meetings had been scheduled for July 22, 2014; October 28, 2014; and January 27, 2015) G. Commission Members' Announcements * 5. Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Report - June 23, 2014 A. Concerns Related to Permit Parking In Front of Wesley Pre-School and Education Building (Committee recommended that staff be authorized to add three (3) additional permit parking spaces on East Loockerman Street and to provide three (3) parking permits to Wesley Church, with parking in this area to be re-evaluated in October and, in the meantime, to work with the DDP to expand the parking inventory) B. Request for Waiver of Public Street Frontage Requirement - Appendix A - Subdivisions, Article VI - Subdivision - General Requirements and Design Standards, Section E - Lots (Dover Mall) (Committee recommended approval of the requested waiver, subject to inclusion of the necessary easements listed in the Development Advisory Committee (DAC) Report, as recommended by the Planning Commission) C. Update - Dover High School Construction (Committee action not required)

Council Agenda - July 14, 2014 Page 3 * 6. Utility Committee Report - June 23, 2014 A. Proposed Ordinance #2014-15 Amending Chapter 110 - Utilities, Article III - Water Service, Division 3 - Water Impact Fees, Section 110-207 - Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units and Article IV - Sanitary Sewer Service, Division 3 - Wastewater Collection Impact Fees, Section 110-282 - Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sponsors: Bonar/Hutchison/Koenig)(See item #12-A) (Committee recommended adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2014-15) * 7. Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report - June 23, 2014 A. Presentation - Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) (Ken Abraham) (Committee action not required) B. Expiration of Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) Loan Guarantee Extension (Committee recommended extension of the Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) loan guarantee with PNC Bank through March 1, 2017, as recommended by staff) C. Proceeds from Sale of Real Estate (Committee recommended that the net proceeds from the sale of governmental fund real estate be credited to the Capital Asset Reserve for future capital projects) D. Proposed Financial Reforms (Committee action not required) * 8. Monthly Reports - May 2014 A. City Assessor’s Report B. City Manager’s Report C. City Planner’s Report D. Controller/Treasurer’s Budget Report E. Economic Development Office Report F. Fire Chief’s Report G. Police Chief’s Report 9. Revaluation Services for the 2015 Assessment (Staff recommends awarding the proposal for revaluation services to Tyler Technologies for the amount of $93,200, plus any additional overage fees) 10. Authorization to Pay Invoice - Sankofa African Dance Company for African American Festival * 11. Appointments (Reappointments) - Recommended by Mayor Christiansen A. Annual Appointments - One (1) Year Terms to Expire May 11, 2015 (These appointments (reappointments) were deferred during the Annual Meeting of May 12, 2014, until the newly elected Mayor was sworn into office. Mayor Christiansen requests the deferral of his remaining appointments until the meeting of July 28, 2014.) a-1. Dover Public Library Advisory Commission - Sean M. Lynn (Council Liaison Member) a-2. Downtown Dover Partnership Board of Directors a-2-i. Scott D. Koenig - City of Dover Representative a-2-ii. Ann Marie Townshend - City of Dover Representative a-2-iii. David L. Bonar - City Council Representative a-2-iv. Wallace R. Dixon - City Council Representative a-2-v. Adam M. Perza - City Council Representative

Council Agenda - July 14, 2014 Page 4 * 11. A. Annual Appointments - One (1) Year Terms to Expire May 11, 2015 (Continued) a-3. Election Board - William Garfinkel (At-Large) - Three (3) Year Term to Expire May 2017 a-4. Silver Lake Commission a-4-i. James Burcham a-4-ii. Zachary Carter a-4-iii. David L. Edgell a-4-iv. Dean Holden a-4-v. Lyle Allen Jones a-4-vi. Ann Marie Townshend a-4-vii. Melanie Tymes B. Downtown Dover Partnership - John Tinsley - To Fill the Unexpired Term of Gary Patterson - Term to Expire May 2015 C. Ethics Commission - Nancy J. Shevock - Five (5) Year Term to Expire July 2019 D. Historic District Commission - Three (3) Year Terms to Expire July 26, 2017 d-1. C. Terry Jackson, Resident d-2. Ann Baker Horsey, Professional d-3. Joseph McDaniel, Business Representative E. Planning Commission - Three (3) Year Terms to Expire June 1, 2017 e-1. Dr. Bobby Jones - First District e-2. Col. Robert D. Welsh - First District e-3. Fred Tolbert - Third District 12. First Reading - Proposed Ordinance #2014-15 with Staff Amendment #1 (SA#1) The First Reading is offered on the following proposed ordinance. Final action by Council will take place during the Second Reading of the ordinance on July 28, 2014. Copies of all proposed ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. A. Proposed Ordinance #2014-15 with Staff Amendment #1 (SA#1) Amending Chapter 110 - Utilities, Article III - Water Service, Division 3 - Water Impact Fees, Section 110-207 - Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units and Article IV - Sanitary Sewer Service, Division 3 - Wastewater Collection Impact Fees, Section 110-282 - Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sponsors: Bonar/Hutchison/Koenig) 13. Council Members’ Announcements /tm S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Council-Agendas\2014\07-14-2014 REVISED.wpd THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.

SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Members of Council met in Executive Session on June 9, 2014 at 8:58 p.m. with Council President Bonar presiding. Members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Lynn, Mr. Perza, Mr. Slavin, Mrs. Williams, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Koenig was also present. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Slavin and unanimously carried. By unanimous consent, the Executive Session was convened pursuant to 29 Del. C. §10004(b)(9) - Personnel Matters (Follow-Up to Council Appointed Employee Performance Evaluation of December 2, 2013 - City Manager, Scott Koenig). Meeting recessed at 8:59 p.m. Mr. Slavin moved to adjourn the Executive Session, seconded by Mrs. Williams and unanimously carried. Executive Session adjourned at 9:10 p.m. POTENTIAL ACTION RESULTING FROM THE EXECUTIVE SESSION Follow-Up to Council Appointed Employee Performance Evaluation of December 2, 2013 - City Manager, Scott Koenig During the Executive Session, Mr. Koenig provided follow-up information related to his performance evaluation of December 2, 2013. Mr. Lynn moved to approve a three percent (3%) pay increase for City Manager Scott Koenig effective June 9, 2014. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes (Anderson, Dixon, Lynn, Williams, Hutchison, and Bonar) and three (3) no (Perza, Slavin, and Hare). By unanimous consent, the Special Council Meeting adjourned at 9:14 p.m. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All orders, ordinances, and resolutions adopted by City Council during their Special Meeting of June 9, 2014 are hereby approved. DAVID L. BONAR COUNCIL PRESIDENT/VICE-MAYOR ACTING /TM S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Council-Minutes\2014\06-09-2014 SPECIAL.wpd

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING The Regular Council Meeting was held on June 23, 2014 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Bonar presiding. Council members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Lynn, Mr. Perza, Mr. Slavin, Mrs. Williams, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Council staff members present were Police Chief Bernat, Mr. Koenig, Mrs. Townshend, City Solicitor Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Council staff members absent were Fire Chief Carey and Mrs. Mitchell. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Bonar declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council was not in official session and could not take formal action. Mr. Edward Thomas Christian, Jr., 9 Pennwood Drive, read the following statement into the record: To those Council Members seated to my left, my right and in front of me, to those staff members and city employees seated in front of me and behind me, I say thank you for what you are doing to and for the City and citizens of Dover, Delaware. I would surmise that most citizens don’t realize how much time and effort are required by City Council Members to serve and even more who do not understand the involvement of staff and employees to sustain City operations. I would state that there is a good mix here - the young, the older, and the in-between. The most challenging and overwhelming factor among you is the factor of being a human being. I accept the fact that each of you may have an ideology and a personal/political philosophy; however, I trust that each of you has completely open and fully engaging listening ears. We have the past which we are not to live in, but learn from; the future for which we plan, but the present for which we must implement. It is demanding of the elected officials/politicians, of which I say that there is a difference between the two, very demanding of you in this game of chance. For there are options that if your chips are insufficient, you must surrender your chair, or if sufficient, you remain at the table to continue to play, or you remove yourself from your chair before the next round is played. I make an effort to listen to special interest individuals, special interest groups, and voting constituents and attempt to understand their requests/demands. You elected officials, because you are much more informed and have a better picture of the affects and effects of your decisions, have a responsibility and by oath of office an obligation to do the right thing for the entire City and not just voting constituents and special interests.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 2 I say to City Council Members, staff, City employees, continue with both hands wide open, flexible fingers, both thumbs up, with a deliberate and safe speed, but with sufficient acceleration as needed to proceed forward. And again, I say KEEP ON TRUCKING! Thank you! Mr. Reuben Salters, 109 Bertrand Drive, noted that later in the meeting members would be reconsidering the evaluation of bids for the Dover Park Recreation Center demolition. He requested that members specifically consider the needs of the young people on the east side of the City. He noted that a need remains for more organized activities and recreation for all children of the City. Mr. Salters stated the importance of recreation for young people’s development, explaining that these young people are the City’s future leaders. He also reminded members that the African American Festival would be held Saturday, June 28, 2014 and encouraged all to attend. Mr. Roy Sudler, Jr., 353 Rita Wilma Road, stated that members are often made aware of complaints and concerns regarding City issues. He was happy to report that Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development; Mr. William Pepper, Deputy City Solicitor; and Mr. Tim Taraila, Inspector III, did an excellent job addressing a recent concern regarding code enforcement. Mr. Sudler commended and thanked them for their professionalism and punctuality in handling the situation. The invocation was given by Bishop Thomas L. Holsey, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the agenda as presented, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the consent agenda as presented, seconded by Mr. Dixon and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 9, 2014 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of June 9, 2014 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Hutchison, seconded by Mr. Dixon and bore the written approval of Council President/Vice-Mayor Acting Bonar. PROCLAMATION - CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 COMMEMORATION DAY The City Clerk read the following Proclamation into the record: WHEREAS, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was landmark legislation in the United States that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and July 2, 2014 will mark the 50th anniversary of the signing of this historic Act; and

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 3 WHEREAS, the Dover Public Library was selected as one of a limited number of institutions nationwide to be awarded a “Created Equal: America’s Civil Rights Struggle” grant, which was offered through the “Bridging Cultures” initiative of the National Endowment for the Humanities through its partnership with the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History; and WHEREAS, to commemorate the signing of the Civil Rights Act, the Dover Public Library, in partnership with the Dover Human Relations Commission and Delaware State University, will offer a series of documentaries recounting the stories of courageous individuals who challenged the social and legal status quo of deeply rooted institutions, from slavery to segregation, to open doors of opportunity for Americans. The series will begin with a viewing of “The Freedom Riders” at the Schwartz Center on July 2, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. and three additional films will be offered at the Dover Public Library during the months of July, August, and September, 2014, with all films to be followed by discussions with civil rights activists or scholars. NOW, THEREFORE, I, DAVID L. BONAR, VICE-MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE do hereby proclaim July 2, 2014 as CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 COMMEMORATION DAY and encourage all residents to participate in the events being offered, educate themselves on the history of civil rights in the United States, and reflect on the ideals of freedom and equality that have helped to bridge cultural and racial division. Council President/Vice-Mayor Acting Bonar presented the Proclamation to Ms. Michelle Hughes, Head of Adult Services, Dover Public Library; Mr. Cecil Wilson, Chair of the Dover Human Relations Commission; and Mr. Calvin Christopher, State Human Relations Commission. Ms. Hughes encouraged the public to participate in the events scheduled for July 2, 2014 to commemorate this important, historic event. Mr. Wilson thanked Mrs. Margie Cyr, Dover Public Library Director, and the entire staff of the Dover Public Library for promoting such a very strong commemoration of the Civil Rights Act. He noted the importance of everyone’s support, explaining that people often tend to elaborate on the past and, in doing so, forget about the future. Mr. Wilson felt that the City of Dover has a very strong future and would continue to move ahead in a positive way. Quoting a statement that he heard the previous day, Mr. Christopher stated: “Rosa sat, so Martin could march, so Obama could run, so we can fly.” He noted that the only way to “fly” is to embrace, commemorate, and continue with this 50-year celebration and do what is right and just. Mr. Christopher thanked the City for including the State in the celebration and continuing with the commemoration. PUBLIC HEARING - VIOLATION OF DANGEROUS BUILDING ORDINANCE - 238 NORTH NEW STREET - OWNED BY JOHN AND SOLEDAD SULLIVAN A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider a violation of the Dangerous Building Ordinance at 238 North New Street, owned by John and Soledad Sullivan. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, stated that the property consisted of a two (2) story, wood-framed, single-family home. The house had been vacant

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 4 since May 9, 2012, and was registered with the City as a vacant building. On June 22, 2011, the home was condemned by staff due to numerous code violations and the failure of the owner to have a state-certified electrical inspection completed. The home was ordered boarded in July of 2011. Mrs. Townshend provided a chronological history and presentation on the condition of the house located at 238 North New Street (Exhibit #1). Staff recommended that City Council: 1) declare this building and all accessory structures on this property dangerous; 2) order the property repaired or demolished by July 23, 2014 by the owner or equity owner at their own risk; 3) order the Building Inspector to cause the repair or demolition of the structures if not completed by the owner within 10 days of the date established by City Council; and 4) order the City Manager with the assistance of the City Solicitor to cause the cost of repairs or demolition to be charged against the land on which the building exists as a municipal lien or cause such cost to be added to the tax duplicate as an assessment, or to be levied as a special tax, or to be recovered in a suit at law against the owner. Council President Bonar declared the public hearing open. There being no one present wishing to speak during the public hearing, Council President Bonar declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Hare moved that the structure located at 238 North New Street be declared a dangerous building and subject to demolition, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. PUBLIC HEARING - VIOLATION OF THE DANGEROUS BUILDING ORDINANCE - 640 NIMITZ ROAD - OWNED BY DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST C/O COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider a violation of the Dangerous Building Ordinance at 640 Nimitz Road, owned by Deutsche Bank National Trust c/o Countrywide Home Loan. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, stated that the property consisted of a two (2) story, wood-framed, single-family home. The house had been vacant since May 8, 2013, and was currently registered with the City as a vacant building. On May 6, 2014, City staff condemned the home due to a fire that occurred earlier that morning. The home was ordered boarded, which was completed on May 15, 2014 by a City contractor. Currently the home was still vacant, with no utilities and numerous outstanding code violations. Mrs. Townshend provided a chronological history and presentation on the condition of the house located at 640 Nimitz Road (Exhibit #2). Staff recommended that City Council: 1) declare this building and all accessory structures on this property dangerous; 2) order the property repaired or demolished by July 23, 2014 by the owner or equity owner at their own risk; 3) order the Building Inspector to cause the repair or demolition of the structures if not completed by the owner within 10 days of the date established by City Council; and 4) order the City Manager with the assistance of the City Solicitor to cause the cost of repairs or demolition to be charged against the land on which the building exists as a municipal lien or cause such cost to be added to the tax duplicate as an assessment, or to be levied as a special tax, or to be recovered in a suit at law against the owner.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 5 Council President Bonar declared the public hearing open. There being no one present wishing to speak during the public hearing, Council President Bonar declared the public hearing closed. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mrs. Townshend stated that the Deutsche Bank National Trust had not responded to the City and noted that this particular bank had not been responsive regarding any vacant buildings. In response to Mr. Perza, Mrs. Townshend confirmed that the photos included in the presentation reflected the current status of the property. Mr. Perza moved that the structure located at 640 Nimitz Road be declared a dangerous building and subject to demolition, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT - JUNE 9, 2014 The Utility Committee met on June 9, 2014 with Chairwoman Williams presiding. Annual Engineering Consultant's Report on the Operation and Maintenance of the Electric System - Fiscal Year 2013 Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, reviewed the conclusions of the Annual Engineering Consultant’s Report on the Operation and Maintenance of the Electric System - Fiscal Year 2013. Referring to Table 4-2: Annual Revenues and Sales Ratios on Page 4-4, Mr. Blakeman noted that revenues were $99,513,156 in FY 2011 and $88,331,196 in FY 2013, and he expressed concern about this $11M reduction in revenue. He indicated that the forecast for the current year was approximately $76M, which would be another $12M reduction, and inquired if this would be a continuing trend. Mrs. Mitchell explained that this was the result of decreases in the power supply cost and that the City had reduced rates in the last two (2) years by approximately 20%. She noted that higher-priced hedges in earlier years had now ended and noted that rates were based on rate studies performed by Burns & McDonnell that took into consideration the cost of services. Referencing Table 4-2, Mr. Blakeman also observed that the residential rate was reduced from $0.1479/kWh to $0.1400 over a three (3) year period, which he felt was a small reduction compared to the reduction in non-residential rates, which had decreased by one (1) cent or more during this period. He questioned if customers were reaping the benefit of more efficient operation of the system. Mrs. Mitchell explained that the rates were based on allocations determined by the cost of service. She stated that residential use accounts for more of the cost of service, noting that nearly all of the distribution is to residential users. Mrs. Williams noted that the historic tenacity of the Electric Fund was beginning to wane a bit and that the City would probably make up the difference in the Water Fund.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 6 The Committee recommended acceptance of the report as presented. (City Clerk’s Office Note: Following the meeting, it was determined that the Annual Engineering Consultant’s Report on the Operation and Maintenance of the Electric System Fiscal Year 2013 did not include updated information. Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/ Treasurer, subsequently provided a revised report.) By consent agenda, Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Dixon and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. TEA/NAES Report (April) The TEA/NAES Monthly Report for April 2014 was provided to members to enable them to monitor electric sales and revenues received, which will provide a better understanding of any fluctuations that occur and allow the opportunity to make improvements if deemed necessary. Referring to the Power Supply Summary on Page 1, Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, explained that overall power supply costs for April 2014 were $267,987 under budget and that this was one (1) of the few times that the City had been under budget for this component of the power cost. He reminded members that the City had experienced difficulty with some of the PJM charges earlier in the fiscal year; however, these charges had now stabilized. In January 2014, the City spent considerably more on the cost of power than anticipated during the budget preparation; however, it was hoped that these costs would track relatively well entering into the FY 15 budget. Prior to this year, there were a number of extremely high cost hedges and the City’s actual costs for power supply had tracked consistently below the budget. Mr. Koenig noted that the budget for the current year had been revised and was tracking much “tighter.” In reference to the April 2014 Power Supply Sources on Page 2 of the report, Mr. Koenig explained that hedge purchases accounted for 79% of the load, the City was in the spot market or day ahead market for 17%, and the Dover Sun Park provided 4% of the City’s power. Referring to the YTD Variance Report, Page 12, he noted that Total - Utilities Cost reflected that these costs exceeded the target by $6,774,576, which was related to very high PJM charges in January. However, he noted that this was allowed for in the budget and staff believed that these costs would be under control in FY 15. Referring to the Capital Improvement Projects (CIP), Page 23, Mr. Koenig stated that NAES seemed to be progressing well through the projects, and noted that the spring outage was complete. He stated that work had been performed on the turbines which involved extra costs associated with their inspection and eventual replacement in the PJM; however, all units were available for operation after the spring outage and were expected to produce when necessary for the PJM.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 7 Mr. Blakeman questioned why the actual Hedged Cost and Unhedged Costs ($/MWh) reflected on Page 2 varied from the budgeted costs, since these costs should be known when the budget is developed. Responding, Mr. Koenig explained that the City’s program states that the City should be 80% hedged on July 1, 2014 for FY 2015; therefore, the cost of 80% of the projected power load should be known. The other 20% is purchased from the market or is related to the Dover Sun Park. At the beginning of the fiscal year, these costs are relatively known. But the hedge position for the out-years is less than 80% because the City does not get up to full 80% hedge until it is coming into the power year. Mr. Koenig explained that the total budget includes the amounts anticipated for the unhedged costs. Mrs. Mitchell further explained that the variance between the $55.67 budgeted hedged cost and the actual hedged cost of $47.91 was the result of the unhedged portion of the power supply and reflected cost reductions in the market. She stated that staff would research the variance in the unhedged energy cost between the budgeted amount of $38.93 and the actual amount of $6.10. Mrs. Williams noted that it was difficult for civilian and elected officials to understand hedged funds and requested that a workshop be provided to members on this topic. She stated her preference that this meeting be scheduled for late in the afternoon (approximately 3:00 p.m. or 4:00 p.m.). Mr. Koenig noted that the City’s contact for The Energy Authority meets with staff each month on a Thursday and suggested that a workshop could be scheduled to follow this monthly meeting. The Committee recommended acceptance of the report. By consent agenda, Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Dixon and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Updates Garrison Oak Technical Park Project Updates Mr. Scott Koenig provided updates on the Garrison Oak Technical Park projects, as follows: City Infrastructure Mr. Koenig stated that City infrastructure contracts were underway at the Garrison Oak Technology Park. A-Del Construction Company had been doing a significant amount of earthwork associated with stormwater management as it ties into the White Oak Tax Ditch. George & Lynch, Inc. was constructing the force main, had done the directional bore underneath Route 1 as well as some additional directional bores under the White Oak Tax Ditch, and was in the process of connecting various components of the force main. He indicated that a field construction issue had arisen adjacent to Baytree and the contractor was working to ensure that the force main could fit between other utilities. Mr. Koenig stated that excavation work for the wet

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 8 well at the pump station was expected to begin shortly. Delivery of some of the stormwater structures had begun. Staff had been working with Chicago Bridge and Iron (CB&I), who would be constructing the water tower, and a mobilization date would be established with this contractor. Calpine Energy Center Mr. Koenig informed members that a number of deliveries were occurring every day to the Calpine Energy Center. The first unit at the Energy Center was well underway, and much of the outside of the unit had been assembled, although a good deal of related piping had yet to be completed. The right-of-way was being cleared of trees for the contractors to run a radial line from the Energy Center back to the 230kV Cartanza Substation. It was Mr. Koenig’s understanding that pole line construction would begin in the next 30 to 60 days and that a good deal of work was taking place at the back of the substation to make necessary improvements for the connection to the grid. Mr. Koenig advised members that a significant amount of activity was taking place at the Garrison Oak Technical Park, including a “kickoff ceremony” that was held in the last 30 days for the Uzin Utz manufacturing facility, which will be constructed on the west side of the Garrison Farm. Approximately 300 construction workers were expected to be associated with the Garrison Energy Center and approximately 30-40 (or more) construction workers with the Uzin Utz property once the steel assembly occurs. Once up and running, City contracts related to infrastructure improvements would involve approximately 20-50 workers, depending on the particular trades that are underway. Mr. Koenig stated that the only contracts that had not been let so far had to do with the relocation of the 69kV electric line on the roadway, and those were expected to be bid out shortly and would be brought forward to Council. This line would start on the east side of the property and involve pole adjustment across the frontage of the Garrison property. Mr. Koenig stated that activities were converging on the date of June 1, 2015, when Calpine expected to be operational in the PJM, and the Uzin Utz facility was tracking along the same lines. It was hoped that the infrastructure and all City projects would be substantially complete by December 31, 2014. Testing for Calpine would occur in February or March 2015, and this date would be in line with the time that the City expected to have staff on line at the Water Treatment Plant to help buffer the impact on the City’s system. Philip Utz, from Uzin Utz, indicated that he hoped to have the outside of the facility constructed by the end of the year and to put equipment in early next year, with the expectation that manufacturing operations would begin in the June timeframe. Mr. Koenig stated that the projects all seemed to be tracking correctly and staff was actively marketing the balance of the property. He expressed that, from a marketing standpoint, interest had increased now that there was construction activity and infrastructure, and staff was hopeful that one (1) or two (2) additional tenants would be realized this year.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 9 Responding to Mr. Blakeman regarding the status of the gas pipeline, Mr. Koenig stated his understanding that line construction was on track, and almost all of the pipe in the area from Leipsic Road going back behind Dover Downs was in place and had been tested. It was his recollection from a conference call with Calpine, that the pipeline was approximately half complete. The right-of-way along the back of Wild Meadows had been cleared, and it was Mr. Koenig’s belief that the line had been dug through this area, but he was unsure if it had yet reached the Calpine property. He stated that this project was moving very smoothly. He stated that his office had not received complaints from residents or motorists. After driving through Wild Meadows a couple of times, he felt that the visual impact of the clearing was not as intense as he anticipated and some trees were left between the houses and the actual right-of-way as a buffer. In response to Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Koenig stated that the target completion date for the gas line was the end of 2014, if not sooner, and that the lateral line would be 16 inches in diameter. Dover Sun Park Members reviewed the Electric Revenue Fund FY14 White Oak Solar Park Incremental Cost. Progress Update on Purchase Power Agreement Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that Mr. Kirk Betts, the City’s Utility Attorney, had been working with a specific contact at Calpine to bring forward a purchase power agreement. A number of iterations had gone back and forth to determine the economic value of power going forward. Mr. Betts was not prepared to bring information forward at this time, and it was hoped that he would be closer to obtaining a number that he believed should be brought forward to Council in this regard within the coming weeks. Discussions were continuing about closing the gap between what the City believed was reasonable and what Calpine believed was reasonable. Mr. Koenig indicated that a draft agreement would come before Council, likely in Executive Session since this would be a legal matter, and would be voted upon in a public session. Responding to Mr. Blakeman, Mr. Koenig stated that staff had not participated in negotiations to this point, and that Mr. Betts and the “number crunchers” from The Energy Authority (TEA) had been passing numbers back and forth. He stated that it was likely that he, Mrs. Mitchell, Mr. Betts, and other key individuals would be included. Mr. Blakeman suggested that if there was someone on staff who would be dealing with this matter on a daily basis, this staff member should be included in negotiations as well. In response to Mrs. Williams, Mrs. Mitchell stated that $100,000 was budgeted in the Electric Fund budget for RFP and contract negotiations in FY 14 and $100,000 in FY 15 because the City was also negotiating with NAES.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 10 By consent agenda, Mr. Hutchison moved for acceptance of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Dixon and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. REVENUE REPORT UPDATE Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed the Revenue Report as of May 31, 2014. Mr. Hare moved for acceptance of the Revenue Report as of May 31, 2014, seconded by Mr. Dixon and unanimously carried. 2014 SPECIAL MAYORAL ELECTION RESULTS Mrs. Traci McDowell, City Clerk, reported the results of the 2014 Special Mayoral Election held on June 17, 2014, as certified by the Election Board, as follows: MAYOR Chevis R. Anderson 101 (6.02%) David L. Anderson 534 (31.82%) Robin R. Christiansen 658 (39.21%) R. Jefferson Reed 197 (11.74%) James P. Webster 188 (11.20%) Total District Votes Cast 1,678 (7.37%) Total Registered Voters 22,779 Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Election Results as reported by the City Clerk. The motion was seconded by Mr. Slavin and unanimously carried. OPPOSITION TO TRANSPORTATION SECRETARY’S PROPOSAL TO CUT $1M FROM MUNICIPAL STREET AID Council President Bonar advised members that it was announced in the State’s budget hearings before the Joint Finance Committee that the Transportation Secretary had submitted a proposal to cut $1M from Municipal Street Aid. He requested authorization to send a letter to relay the City’s opposition to the proposal. Mr. Lynn moved to authorize the Council President to send a letter in opposition to the Transportation Secretary’s proposal to cut $1M from Municipal Street Aid. The motion was seconded by Mr. Slavin and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. FINAL READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCES The First Reading of the following proposed ordinances was accomplished during the Council Meeting of June 9, 2014. Mrs. Williams moved that the Final Readings of the proposed ordinances be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 11 Proposed Ordinance #2014-16 Amending Appendix E - Commercial and Industrial Building Redevelopment As a sponsor of Proposed Ordinance #2014-16, Mr. Anderson explained that the proposed amendment would extend the sunset provision for the tax abatement, impact fee waiver, and building permit waiver incentives for three (3) years, noting that these provisions had proven to be beneficial and an important part of the City’s economic development. Mr. Anderson moved for adoption of the proposed ordinance, seconded by Mr. Slavin, and by a unanimous roll call vote, Council adopted Ordinance #2014-16, as follows: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: That Appendix E - Commercial and Industrial Building Redevelopment, Article VI - Severability and Effective Dates, Section 2 - Effective Dates of the Dover Code be amended to read as follows: Section 2. Effective dates. This ordinance became effective April 15, 2012. The provisions of this ordinance shall no longer apply after December 31, 2018. ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 Proposed Ordinance #2014-17 - FY2014/15 City of Dover Budget Ordinances Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that Proposed Ordinance #2014-17, FY2014/15 City of Dover Budget Ordinances, identified the FY2015 spending plan for the City of Dover, which included approximately $136M across all funds. He noted that the proposed ordinance had been revised to reflect action from the budget hearing of June 11, 2014 and, as requested by City Council, included the transfer of $10M from the Electric Fund to the General Fund. He stated that it also included an additional appropriation, in the amount of $100,000, to the Parkland Reserve Fund for funds to be used for a future recreation facility, and reminded members that an additional $80,000 was included in the Capital Plan related to a potential recreation facility that was identified during the budget process. The $100,000 required an adjustment to the Street Program; therefore, the total for the Street Program for FY2015 would be $900,000. As presented, Mr. Koenig stated that there was no tax increase in the proposed budget; however, there remained a $1.25 increase in the water customer charge, a $1.25 increase in the sewer customer charge, and a .45¢ increase in the ground water inflow/infiltration charge (increase from $1.05 to $1.50 per 1,000 gallons on the monthly bill). He stated that there were no proposed changes to the electric rates within the electric service territory for the City of Dover. Mr. Hare moved for adoption of Ordinance #2014-17 (Exhibit #3), seconded by Mr. Dixon and carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes (Anderson, Dixon, Lynn, Hare, Hutchison, and Bonar) and three (3) no (Perza, Slavin, and Williams).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 12 RECONSIDERATION OF EVALUATION OF BIDS - DOVER PARK RECREATION CENTER DEMOLITION During their Regular Meeting of June 9, 2014, City Council considered the evaluation of bids for the demolition of the Dover Park Recreation Center. Staff recommended awarding the contract to Delaware Mulch and Stone in the amount of $35,600. The motion to approve staff’s recommendation failed by a roll call vote of five (5) no (Anderson, Dixon, Lynn, Slavin, and Bonar) and four (4) yes (Perza, Williams, Hare, and Hutchison). Council President Bonar advised members that Mr. Anderson had requested the reconsideration of this matter. Mr. Anderson moved for the reconsideration of the demolition of the Dover Park Recreation Center, as recommended by staff, conditioned upon the published issuance of an architectural Request for Proposals (RFP) for a replacement building by December 31, 2014 which shall contain basketball courts and that staff be instructed to target July of 2015 for bids for a replacement facility. The motion was seconded by Mr. Dixon. Mr. Lynn relayed concern that an RFP would not be definitive and suggested that the motion be amended to include a commitment that “ground be broken” in calendar year 2015. Responding, Mr. Anderson stated that, although he had no objections, the motion would require bids to be let in July 2015, which would include the next budget cycle and would provide the City two (2) budget cycles to adjust, as well as time for a study. Mr. Anderson agreed to amend the motion to include the requirement for a groundbreaking sometime in 2015, as did the seconder, Mr. Dixon. Responding to Mr. Koenig’s concerns, Mr. Anderson confirmed that the motion included authorization for staff to move forward with the bid for the demolition prior to the RFP for a replacement building. He stated that the motion simply included the condition that the RFP be done by December 31, 2014 and explained that the reason for providing that much time was his hope that there would be preliminary reports from the Recreational Needs Assessment by the end of September. Since staff had until the end of the year to issue the RFP, he felt that this would give staff ample time to react. Mr. Perza expressed his opinion that members may be getting “ahead of themselves,” explaining that the Recreational Needs Assessment, which would be conducted to determine what should be done to improve the Dover Park as well as all other parks in the City, would not be completed for another six (6) months. He noted that the results of the assessment may not justify the City spending funds on a building at the Dover Park. If the City were to move forward by putting out RFPs and groundbreaking requirements before obtaining the results of the assessment and allowing the public to comment, it was his opinion that City Council would be depriving the City of the entire function of taking public comment. Mr. Perza reminded members that six (6) to nine (9) months of time had been spent on meeting with engineers, contractors, environmental specialists, and staff of the Parks and Planning Departments for the sole purpose of determining whether the building at the Dover Park was worth salvaging. He felt that the building could be salvaged if the City’s resources were

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 13 not limited and if the City wanted to spend $300,000 on the rehabilitation of the building, before determining what should be done with it, this could be done; however, the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee unanimously determined, on three (3) different occasions, that this would not be a wise use of resources. Mr. Perza stated that the specific question addressed by the Committee was whether spending money on the rehabilitation of the building at the Dover Park was a smart use of taxpayers’ dollars, and doing so was rejected by the Committee three (3) times. City Council finally approved the removal of the building, which brought the City to the point of determining what needed to be done next. Mr. Perza stated that City Council could not determine what to do next because Council had no input yet from the public or from the survey that the Planning Department had been working on for six (6) months, with six (6) months remaining for its conclusion. Therefore, he stated that if City Council made a decision now without this input, there would be no point in having the Planning Department continue to work on the survey and, being “tight” on staff, he suggested that members terminate the study and allow staff to reallocate resources for other uses at this point. Mr. Perza indicated his concern that members were getting confused between the purposes of what was being considered. He stated that the questions were “is the City removing the building” and “how much money is the City spending on it.” He reminded members that the answer to the question “is the City removing the building” had already been decided by the City, and the answer to the question “how much money is the City spending on it” was “the least amount possible,” which was the point of staff’s recommendation to spend $30,000 for its demolition, which was the question before City Council at this time. He explained that what the City does to replace the building is a question that would come up later, at a different time, after input from the public. If the motion were approved, he stated that members of City Council would basically be creating a situation whereby the City knows better than the public and had not taken the time to solicit public comments. Mrs. Williams suggested that members recall what happened when the City decided not to listen to the public regarding Schutte Park, noting that half of Council was not re-elected because they did not want to take this issue to referendum, did not want to follow the referendum results, and did not want the people to speak. She relayed her total concurrence with Mr. Perza and urged members to obtain public input regarding the issue. Mr. Slavin relayed confusion as to what the path forward would be on a replacement building at Dover Park. He understood that the Recreational Needs Assessment would continue and be done by the end of the calendar year. Responding, Mrs. Townshend indicated her hope that the assessment would be completed by October/November. Elaborating, Mr. Perza stated that members of City Council should be made aware of the results of the assessment, which would indicate what the citizens want at the Dover Park, in approximately six (6) months. Noting that the motion included a solution that would include basketball courts, Mr. Slavin indicated his understanding that the Needs Assessment was to determine what functions would be placed on the site. In addition, he understood that the motion included an RFP for architectural and design fees for a design, which would take the City to construction documents, to be done within a six (6) month period, with bids for construction to be received by July 2015, and the groundbreaking by the end of calendar year 2015. Mr. Slavin indicated his feeling that this was a highly compressed schedule

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 14 for this type of project and, although he appreciated all the work that had been done, once the building was demolished, the urgency of creating a solution for the recreational needs of the children on the east side of the City would be eliminated. He noted that this type of situation had occurred in the past, reminding members that, several years ago, it was suggested that the City not issue a demolition permit for the old Capital Office Supply building for the purpose of a new hotel to be erected until the building permit was issued for the new hotel, otherwise, it would result in a “hole in the ground” in the downtown area. He stated that, close to 15 years later, the City had a vacant lot, which had since been redeveloped into something pleasant, but was a “hole in the ground” for several years. He reiterated his fear that if the City demolished the building at the Dover Park, the urgency to take action would be lost and the City would lose its ability to take any further action at the site. Mr. Anderson stated that he reviewed past minutes and was reminded that there had been much public testimony regarding this matter at the Committee meetings in October and November 2013, February 2014, and at other times. He stated that, based on this testimony, it was clear that the public desired a facility at Dover Park and actually opposed the demolition of the current building. However, he realized that the facility was no longer useful in its current condition and had effectively been demolished. He agreed that the public had scepticism regarding this issue and concurred with Mr. Hare’s previous suggestions that the City should consider alternatives for providing a structure that would be inexpensive but effective, since young people are not concerned with grand designs and a multimillion dollar building but rather adequate facilities that continue regardless of weather and provide year-round recreation. He welcomed members to make amendments to the motion. Responding to Mr. Hare, Mrs. Townshend stated that there would be no significant costs for the City if the building remained, explaining that the alarm system had been disconnected and there were no utilities associated with the building. There would simply be costs associated for periodic policing of the area. After speaking with the residents near the Dover Park, Mr. Hare stated that it was their desire for some type of facility to be provided; however, it was also their desire for that particular building to be demolished, explaining that they indicated that they do not feel safe going out after a certain time due to the people that were being attracted to the site. He stated that, in addition to basketball courts, the residents had indicated a desire for a skate park at the site. Whether the building was standing or not would not change people’s minds about whether or not the City should provide some type of recreation facility. Mr. Hare reiterated that although the residents adjacent to Dover Park would like some type of recreation facility, it was their desire for the current structure to be demolished due to the elements the building attracts. He indicated his support for the demolition of the structure now, expressing his opinion that it would only promote action to be taken quicker. He stated that he did not believe there was a need to delay the demolition of the building any longer. Mr. Lynn stated that the fact that members were having such a conversation was a testament that the impetus for any movement in Dover Park was the continued existence of the building; therefore, he would not support any move that would demolish the building without concrete plans to take some other action at Dover Park. He noted that the children on the east side of Dover were in need of recreational activities and that it was unconscionable to believe the children should cross Route 13, by bicycle or foot, to get to Schutte Park and, since it would put the youth who reside on the east side

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 15 of Dover in danger, he could not support such a concept. If the City were to make a firm commitment to build a new facility or provide other recreational facilities for the east side of Dover, as suggested by the motion, he would support the idea. However, he felt that the comments and concerns of Mr. Slavin were legitimate. Mr. Lynn did not feel there was a need to hurry the demolition of the building and that the mere fact that the building existed meant that it continued to exist on the City’s radar and would continue to spur this type of discussion. He also relayed concern with the manpower element in the Planning Department, noting that staff could not provide a firm date of October for the completion of the Needs Assessment. Mr. Lynn stated that the hesitation with which those questions were answered gave him some concern. Referring to funding, Mr. Slavin questioned the amount of money that would remain for the architectural and engineering costs after the demolition. Responding, Mr. Koenig explained that the monies used for demolition were held in a separate account; therefore, $80,000 in the Capital Plan and $100,000 in the Parkland Reserve Fund (a total of $180,000) was provided for in the FY2015 budget in association with a new facility. Mr. Slavin stated his concern that typically construction costs are six (6) to seven (7) times the architectural and engineering costs; therefore, $180,000 would not be enough for a new building. As a result, staff would either need to request an appropriation for the project in mid-fiscal year or include it in the next fiscal year’s budget. Based on the difficulty experienced by members of Council in the last six (6) weeks in approving a budget with new expenses, he was concerned that staff would not obtain Council’s support for the requested appropriation. In reviewing the motion, Mrs. Townshend stated that if an RFP was let in late December 2014, proposals would not be brought before City Council to award a contract until sometime in February 2015. By the time the architect does their work and the City begins to go through the process, she stated that there would be no way that the groundbreaking could occur as stipulated. She stated that it would be impossible for the City to go to construction in calendar year 2015. With regard to costs, Mrs. Townshend stressed that if a facility were constructed, there would not only be capital costs but also operational costs. Based on experience, she stated that the City did not currently have the staff to effectively and safely run two (2) facilities, which is why it was imperative for staff to be placed at one (1) location. It was not safe to have a recreation center staffed by one (1) person, which would occur if there were two (2) locations, with a staff of five (5). As a result, she stated that as members discuss what type of facility is desired and the capital costs involved, there also must be a discussion regarding the impact on the operating budget, since two (2) separate locations could not be accommodated with the five (5) employees the City currently had in that Department. Mr. Perza indicated that the procedures that the City has in place were designed to address all issues including staffing needs, funding, etc. Realistically, he felt that it would be two (2) years before construction could begin. By going outside of the process and basically amending the procedure by modifying what was going to occur to obtain a result, he felt that the City would be locking itself into unknown consequences. With regard to Mr. Lynn’s previous comment regarding the “unconscionableness” of residents having to make their way from one end of the City to the other for recreation, Mr. Perza stated that, as a representative of south Dover (Woodbrook, Mayfair, Crossgates, etc.), residents in this area did not have any recreational facilities (buildings); however,

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 16 basketball courts, soccer fields, and softball/baseball fields were made available. He did not feel it was “unconscionable” that individuals could play in the parks provided, explaining that nowhere was a park required to have a $100,000, $200,000, or $300,000 building in order to be accepted as a park in the City. For whatever reasons, he stated that the City built Schutte Park several years ago, which became the central park for the City; however, the neighborhoods within the City still had their own parks, and a building was not required in order for residents to play in and enjoy them. He indicated that Dover Park was a park that currently did not effectively have a building, but noted that a building was not necessary for individuals to enjoy the park. Responding to Mr. Hutchison regarding the City’s costs per year for providing recreation in the City of Dover, Mrs. Townshend stated that the operating budget was a little more than $600,000. Referring to the Needs Assessment, Mr. Hutchison stated the importance of including the schools, YMCA, churches, Boys and Girls Club, etc. in order to obtain an understanding of what was provided in the City, explaining that there were other options in addition to constructing a building. He indicated that when the City built Schutte Park, it was built for all residents of the City and he could not support making any financial commitment to constructing another building; however, he felt that the current structure needed to be demolished. Mr. Hutchison stated that City Council members should not take action that would commit to the construction of a building without having a study or comprehensive understanding of the needs of the community. It was his feeling that the City was acting like the Federal Government - spending money it did not have. Mr. Hare stated that, as indicated by staff, it would be two (2) years before any construction could begin. In the meantime, he suggested that transportation (buses) be provided for residents to be picked up at the Dover Park and transported to Schutte Park if they are interested in programs there. If members of City Council wished to delay the demolition at this time, he stated that when they do decide to demolish the building, any costs over the $35,600 (current low bid), should come out of City Council’s salary and budget. Elaborating, he stated that if it costs an additional $15,000 to demolish the building in a year, year and a half, or two (2) years, each member of Council should be responsible for that cost. Mrs. Williams expressed her frustration in hearing about doing something in the future. She advised members that the City currently, in conjunction with Aid in Dover, the organization that she is associated with, has a program that has been in operation for the last year that provides basketball for kids who are at risk. She stated that the participants are from all over the City and are provided transportation. Rather than talking about what is going to happen, she suggested the possibility of expanding a service that was already being provided; however, she stated that it could not be expanded without budgeting additional funds. If members chose to leave the building erected, she stated that the City would be sponsoring recreation - buying and selling drugs, noting that this was the type of activity currently taking place behind the building. Mr. Dixon stated his concern that the City includes a fee for children to participate in recreation activities, explaining that many parents do not have money to pay these fees. It was his feeling that the City was in need of another facility and noted that even if the City provided transportation, children might miss their rides.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 17 Mr. Anderson stated appreciation for the discussion and indicated that it was the result of there being a forgotten part of the City. He indicated his openness to amending the motion and explained that although there were target dates, he did not mean for there to be any obligation and that if the target dates could not be met, staff could submit a request to establish new dates. Mr. Anderson indicated his desire to amend the motion to reflect the requirement for a groundbreaking sometime in 2016, rather than 2015, and there was no objection by the seconder, Mr. Dixon. In response to Mr. Slavin, Council President Bonar suggested that the maker of the motion and the seconder withdraw the motion and that the motion be restated. Mr. Anderson withdrew the motion to amend, as did the seconder, Mr. Dixon. Mr. Anderson withdrew the main motion, as did the seconder, Mr. Dixon. For clarification, Council President Bonar announced that there was no motion on the floor at this time. Mr. Anderson moved for the reconsideration of the demolition of the Dover Park Recreation Center, as recommended by staff, conditioned upon the issuance of an architectural Request for Proposals (RFP) for a replacement building to be published by December 31, 2014 and that staff be instructed to target bids in FY2015 with a goal for a groundbreaking by the end of 2016. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lynn. Mr. Perza requested that the question be divided in order for separate votes to be taken on the issue of demolition of the current building and the construction of a new building. Mr. Perza moved to divide the motion to consider two (2) issues: 1) the reconsideration of the demolition of the Dover Park Recreation Center, as recommended by staff; and 2) the condition for the issuance of an architectural Request for Proposals (RFP) for a replacement building to be published by December 31, 2014 and that staff be instructed to target bids in FY2015 with a goal for a groundbreaking by the end of 2016. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Williams. With objections to the motion to divide, Mr. Lynn reminded the City Solicitor that this was a motion for reconsideration and that allowing Mr. Perza to amend the motion would be effectively allowing him to go beyond the scope of the motion for reconsideration, explaining that Mr. Perza voted on the failing side of the original motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, he could not be in a position to go forward on a motion for reconsideration because he was not on the prevailing side. Therefore, Mr. Lynn stated that the motion to divide effectively would allow Mr. Perza to revisit the motion for reconsideration, which Mr. Perza did not have standing to do and, as a result, such a motion would be procedurally improper.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 18 Council President Bonar announced that the City Solicitor concurred with Mr. Lynn; therefore, he would present the motion as stated by Mr. Anderson and seconded by Mr. Lynn. Responding to Mr. Hare, Mrs. Townshend expressed her belief that the goal for a groundbreaking to occur by the end of calendar year 2016 was an acceptable time frame, provided that funding was available for the construction of a building. Mr. Hare questioned the results of approving the motion, explaining that as stated, if an RFP were let and the lowest bid indicated a cost of $2.5M for a building, then the City must follow through since the motion would require groundbreaking by the end of 2016. Responding, Mr. Anderson explained that the dates included in the motion were target dates and, noting that this project required a process, he stated that at any time during this process if it were proven not to be the direction desired, Council would have the ability not to fund the construction of a building and make a motion to redirect staff concerning this matter. He assured members that the motion would provide staff the framework with the intent of City Council, as stated at this time. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Council President Bonar indicated that the motion before City Council was for the reconsideration of the evaluation of bids for the Dover Park Recreation Center demolition. In response to the explanation provided to Mrs. Williams by Council President Bonar, Mr. Anderson questioned if the Chair had elected to divide the question. At the request of Mr. Slavin and there being no objections, Council President Bonar declared a five (5) minute recess. Meeting recessed at 8:37 p.m. and reconvened at 8:46 p.m. Mr. Anderson moved for the reconsideration of staff’s recommendation to award the demolition contract to Delaware Mulch and Stone in the amount of $35,600, seconded by Mr. Slavin. In the interest of compromise and development of a solution, Mr. Slavin explained that the first issue was to agree to the demolition of the building at the Dover Park Recreation Center in the interest of public safety. In addition, a second component, in the form of a subsequent motion, would be for the RFP process to be “out on the street” in December and completed by May 2015 so that Council would have a budget estimate for whatever solution the architect determined in that design process. He suggested that a third component/motion would stipulate that, with the City currently dedicating $180,000 to this solution, it would be necessary for the costs for the architectural design, approximately $50,000-$60,000, to be paid from the $180,000 and that if the next sitting Council that adopts the next budget determines that the solution for Dover Park is too expensive, the balance of those funds would be dedicated to Dover Park and a recreation solution, whether that be programmatic or capital.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 19 On a call for the question by Mrs. Williams, the motion for the reconsideration of staff's recommendation to award the demolition contract to Delaware Mulch and Stone in the amount of $35,600 was approved by a roll call vote of eight (8) yes (Anderson, Dixon, Perza, Slavin, Williams, Hare, Hutchison, and Bonar) and one (1) no (Lynn). Mr. Slavin moved that the City let out a Request for Proposals (RFP) for architectural design services for a replacement building at Dover Park, that these design services would commence after the Recreational Needs Assessment is complete, and that a budget estimate for a solution be provided by May 1, 2015. The motion was seconded by Mr. Dixon. In response to Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Townshend reminded members that when staff was directed to conduct a Needs Assessment, it was to be completed by the end of the year and that there was a three (3) month difference between October and December. She felt that this time would be necessary to complete the Needs Assessment. It was her feeling that having the December deadline for the Needs Assessment would provide ample time to hire the architectural engineer and provide a budget estimate by the May 1, 2015 date. Responding to Mr. Perza, Mrs. Townshend stated that the survey would continue to be a City-wide Recreational Needs Assessment, regardless of the action taken by members this evening; however, there would be very specific targeted pieces in regard to how to deal with Dover Park and the building needs. At the request of Mrs. Williams, Mr. Slavin stated that approval of the motion would confirm that the City would be spending funds on the architectural design services. For further clarification, he stated that if the Needs Assessment indicated that there was not a need for the replacement of the building but rather other amenities in that park, that would be the direction for the architectural design to follow. The motion that the City let out a Request for Proposals (RFP) for architectural design services for a replacement building at Dover Park, that these design services would commence after the Recreational Needs Assessment is complete, and that a budget estimate for a solution be provided by May 1, 2015 was carried by a roll call vote of seven (7) yes (Anderson, Dixon, Lynn, Slavin, Williams, Hare, and Bonar) and two (2) no (Perza and Hutchison). Mr. Slavin moved that the total funds currently allocated for the Dover Park solution in the amount of $180,000 will be used to pay for the architectural design fees and that the balance of those funds will be dedicated to improvements at Dover Park, whether they be program or capital improvements, whether or not the next Council chooses to accept the recommendations of the architect. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lynn. Mrs. Townshend explained that there was $100,000 in the Parkland Reserve, which can be used only for capital and $80,000 in the Capital Plan; therefore, these funds could not be used for programming unless the funds were transferred by City Council. Responding, Mr. Slavin stated that Council would adhere to those restrictions.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 20 The motion that the total funds currently allocated for the Dover Park solution in the amount of $180,000 will be used to pay for the architectural design fees and that the balance of those funds will be dedicated to improvements at Dover Park whether they be program or capital improvements, whether or not the next Council chooses to accept the recommendations of the architect was carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes (Anderson, Dixon, Lynn, Slavin, Hare, and Bonar) and three (3) no (Perza, Williams and Hutchison). COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ANNOUNCEMENTS On behalf of all members of Council, Council President Bonar wished Mr. Hutchison a happy belated birthday (June 20th) and Mr. Hare a happy early birthday (July 6th). Council President Bonar also reminded members that the African American Festival would be held this Saturday, June 28, 2014. At the request of Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Townshend announced that on Thursday, June 26th, from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Dover Public Library, a Public Workshop would be held on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan currently underway as a joint effort of the Dover/Kent County MPO and the City of Dover. On behalf of the City, Mr. Perza relayed appreciation to the Norfolk Southern Railroad for holding the public Whistle Stop Train Ride from Harrington to Newark early in the day, to address public safety. He felt the event was a very informative, well put together program, and an enjoyable time. Mr. Anderson reminded members that the Delaware League of Local Governments meeting was scheduled for this Thursday, beginning at 5:00 p.m. for the social hour, noting that at 6:00 p.m. there would be a special event that he could not publicly announce at this time. Mr. Anderson stated that, in addition to the African American Festival which is always held on the fourth Saturday in the month of June, the Independence Day celebration would be held on July 4th and that he looked forward to sharing that time with the community. Mr. Slavin recognized the work of the City Clerk’s Office in conducting the City-wide election this past week, as well as the poll workers who assisted with this election. Council President Bonar stated that the new Mayor would assume his responsibilities on Wednesday evening and that serving as the Vice-Mayor Acting, he realized that there was a lot more involved with the responsibilities of the Mayor. He noted that he met with all personnel of the Dover Police Department and relayed appreciation for their work, encouraging them to continue their work, and assured them that they had the full support of City Council. Mr. Bonar recognized that former Mayor Carey and his wife were in attendance and welcomed them. Regardless of information that was printed in the newspaper, he stated that Mayor Carey contributed 50 years of service to the community and the City will now move on from this point forward. Mr. Hare also commended the work of the City Clerk’s Office.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 21 Council President Bonar reminded everyone that there would be a Special City Council Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 25, 2014, when the new Mayor, Robin R. Christiansen, would be sworn in. By unanimous consent, the meeting adjourned at 9:01 p.m. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All orders, ordinances, and resolutions adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of June 23, 2014, are hereby approved. DAVID L. BONAR VICE-MAYOR ACTING /TM/jg S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Council-Minutes\2014\06-23-2014.wpd Exhibits Exhibit #1 - Presentation - Violation of Dangerous Building Ordinance - 238 North New Street Exhibit #2 - Presentation - Violation of Dangerous Building Ordinance - 640 Nimitz Road Exhibit #3 - Ordinance #2014-17 - FY2014/15 City of Dover Budget Ordinances

EXHIBIT #1 Regular Council Meeting of 6/23/2014 Violation of Dangerous Building Ordinance 238 N New St Planning & Inspections Department Dover, Delaware June 23, 2014 EXHIBIT #1 Regular Council Meeting of 6/23/2014

238 N New St Case History  29 code enforcement cases since 2005 – Exterior code violations – dilapidated fence – Junked cars – failure to obtain building permits – Numerous grass violations – parking on the grass  The utilities were terminated on June 23, 2011  Registered as vacant by the city on March 9, 2012  Condemned by City Staff on June 22, 2011 due to no active utilities, open code violations, unlocked doors and subjects gaining entry to the property.  Source of neighbor complaints – prostitution and drug activities. Outstanding Charges – $1,7500.00 in unpaid vacant building registration fees

Dangerous Building Code – Chapter 22 Article XI, Sec. 22-381 (5) Unfit for habitation. (9) General welfare. (10) Code violations. (12) Unoccupied buildings.

Recommended Council Action  Declare this building and all accessory structures on this property dangerous.  Order the property repaired or demolished by July 23, 2014 by the owner or equity owner at their own risk.  Order the Building Inspector to cause the repair or demolition of the structures if not completed by the owner within 10 days of the date established by City Council.  Order the City Manager with the assistance of the City Solicitor to cause the cost of repairs or demolition to be charged against the land on which the building exists as a municipal lien or cause such cost to be added to the tax duplicate as an assessment, or to be levied as a special tax, or to be recovered in a suit at law against the owner.

EXHIBIT #2 Regular Council Meeting of 6/23/2014 Violation of Dangerous Building Ordinance 640 Nimitz Rd Planning & Inspections Department Dover, Delaware June 23, 2014 EXHIBIT #2 Regular Council Meeting of 6/23/2014

640 Nimitz Rd Case History  19 code enforcement cases since 2006 – Exterior code violations / junked - unregistered vehicles – Numerous violations of tall grass and weeds  The utilities were terminated on January 6, 2013  Registered as vacant by the city on June 6, 2013  Condemned by City Staff on May 6, 2014 due to the amount of structural damaged caused by a fire.  Source of neighbor complaints  Outstanding Charges – $550.00 in unpaid registration fees & code citations – $555.00 fee to have the structure boarded – $3,240.98 in unpaid utilities

Dangerous Building Code – Chapter 22 Article XI, Sec. 22-381 (4) Fire damage, etc. (5) Unfit for habitation. (9) General welfare. (10) Code violations. (12) Unoccupied buildings.

Recommended Council Action  Declare this building and all accessory structures on this property dangerous.  Order the property repaired or demolished by July 23, 2014 by the owner or equity owner at their own risk.  Order the Building Inspector to cause the repair or demolition of the structures if not completed by the owner within 10 days of the date established by City Council.  Order the City Manager with the assistance of the City Solicitor to cause the cost of repairs or demolition to be charged against the land on which the building exists as a municipal lien or cause such cost to be added to the tax duplicate as an assessment, or to be levied as a special tax, or to be recovered in a suit at law against the owner.

EXHIBIT #3 Regular Council Meeting of 06-23-2014 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2014-17 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 2 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Forty Two Million Two Hundred Forty Three Thousand Nine Hundred 3 dollars ($42,243,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 4 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning 5 July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 6 GENERAL FUND 7 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 8 2013/14 2014/15 9 REVISED BUDGET 10 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 4,219,800 $ 3,393,000 11 REVENUES 12 FINES AND POLICE REVENUE 573,900 629,300 13 INVESTMENT INCOME 40,000 40,000 14 LIBRARY REVENUES 70,500 71,600 15 KENT COUNTY BOOK REIMBURSEMENT 460,000 450,000 16 BUSINESS LICENSES 1,460,000 1,460,000 17 PERMITS AND OTHER LICENSES 1,332,500 1,354,200 18 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 53,100 53,900 19 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 650,000 659,500 20 PROPERTY TAXES 11,046,000 11,049,200 21 BID REVENUE 49,500 50,000 22 RECREATION REVENUE 148,800 148,800 23 FRANCHISE FEE 636,000 636,000 24 SANITATION FEES 2,595,600 2,595,600 25 RENT REVENUE - GARRISON FARM 118,500 101,400 26 COURT OF CHANCERY FEES 1,002,200 1,023,000 27 REVENUES SUBTOTAL 20,236,600 20,322,500 28 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS 29 INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS WATER/WASTEWATER 1,360,300 1,354,900 30 INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS ELECTRIC 3,572,700 3,508,100 31 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 4,933,000 4,863,000 32 GRANTS 33 POLICE RELATED 126,800 124,000 34 POLICE PENSION GRANT 500,000 500,000 35 GREEN ENERGY GRANT 98,500 98,500 36 MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS 25,000 25,000 37 GRANTS SUBTOTAL 750,300 747,500 38 TRANSFERS FROM 39 TRANSFER TAX 1,393,000 1,250,000 40 MUNICIPAL STREET AID 663,900 663,900 41 CIVIL TRAFFIC PENALTIES 368,400 500,000 42 WATER/WASTEWATER 500,000 500,000 43 ELECTRIC 8,000,000 10,000,000 44 OTHER RESERVES INCLUDING CONTINGENCY 32,000 4,000 45 CONTINGENCY FUND 250,000 - 46 TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL 11,207,300 12,917,900 47 TOTAL REVENUES 37,127,200 38,850,900 48 TOTALS $ 41,347,000 $ 42,243,900 1

49 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 50 GENERAL FUND - EXPENDITURES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2014-2015 51 2013/14 2014/15 52 DEPARTMENT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 53 CITY CLERK $ 371,700 $ 383,200 54 COUNCIL 107,800 106,600 55 TAX ASSESSOR 208,400 309,500 56 FIRE 741,600 716,100 57 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 1,160,700 1,123,800 58 LIBRARY 1,336,900 1,393,100 59 RECREATION 717,200 706,400 60 LIFE SAFETY 491,400 504,800 61 CODE INFORCEMENT 432,300 418,400 62 PLANNING 422,600 444,100 63 INSPECTIONS 695,200 602,100 64 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 215,200 223,000 65 POLICE 14,346,800 13,986,100 66 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 776,800 712,500 67 STREETS 660,300 665,100 68 SANITATION 2,253,500 2,248,000 69 CITY MANAGER 460,000 592,500 70 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 740,000 728,700 71 FINANCE 980,000 947,100 72 PUBLIC SERVICES - ADMINISTRATION 513,100 514,800 73 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 689,100 677,800 74 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING - 192,600 75 PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY 559,400 535,600 76 FLEET MAINTENANCE 770,900 776,700 77 CUSTOMER SERVICES 1,232,200 1,040,300 78 HUMAN RESOURCES 393,100 379,700 79 MAYOR 83,300 74,900 80 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTALS 31,359,500 31,003,500 81 OTHER EXPENSES 82 DEBT SERVICE 557,300 708,600 83 CONTRIBUTION TO DDP 162,400 70,000 84 MISCELLANEOUS GRANT RELATED EXPENSES 25,000 25,000 85 INSURANCE 658,900 724,800 86 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 1,636,500 1,636,500 87 OTHER EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES 10,700 500,000 88 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 121,000 - 89 POLICE PENSION FUND - STATE GRANT 500,000 500,000 90 POLICE PENSION FUND - UNFUNDED LIABILITY 689,400 655,000 91 UNCOLLECTIBLES - TRASH AND OTHER 10,000 50,000 92 STREET LIGHTS 774,500 774,500 93 OTHER EXPENSE SUBTOTAL 5,145,700 5,644,400 94 TRANSFERS 95 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND - PROJECTS 1,448,800 2,196,000 96 TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL 1,448,800 2,196,000 97 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 37,954,000 38,843,900 98 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 3,393,000 3,400,000 99 TOTALS $ 41,347,000 $ 42,243,900 100 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 101 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 102 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 103 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 2

104 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 105 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 106 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Six Million Forty Five Thousand Five Hundred dollars 107 ($6,045,500) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 108 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014 109 and ending June 30, 2015: 110 GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 111 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 112 REVENUES 113 2013/14 2014/15 114 REVISED BUDGET 115 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 3,058,300 $ 117,100 116 REVENUES 117 STATE GRANTS - OTHER 15,000 153,000 118 BOND PROCEEDS - STREET PROGRAM - 2,661,100 119 LEASE PURCHASE OF FIRE AND POLICE EQUIPT - 918,300 120 CONTRACTOR CONTRIBUTIONS 264,800 - 121 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND FOR PROJECTS 1,448,800 2,196,000 122 TRANSFER FROM PARKLAND RESERVE 80,000 - 123 TRANSFER FROM MUNICIPAL STREET AID CAPITAL GRANT 251,200 - 124 TRANSFER FROM COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION GRANT 60,500 - 124 SUBTOTAL PROJECT RECEIPTS 2,120,300 5,928,400 125 STATE GRANTS - LIBRARY 150,000 - 126 LIBRARY CAPITAL PLEDGES 5,000 - 127 TOTAL REVENUES 2,275,300 5,928,400 128 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE AND REVENUES $ 5,333,600 $ 6,045,500 129 EXPENSE SUMMARY 130 2013/14 2014/15 131 DEPARTMENT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 132 FIRE $ 238,500 $ 827,300 133 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 50,100 68,100 134 LIBRARY 446,500 - 135 RECREATION 172,000 146,000 136 CODE ENFORCEMENT 30,900 - 137 POLICE 342,400 499,100 138 STREETS 1,524,600 1,370,300 139 STREETS GARRISON FARM INFRASTRUCTURE 1,936,100 2,586,100 140 SANITATION 395,600 256,500 141 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 7,000 - 142 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 17,800 - 143 PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY 55,000 - 144 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTAL 5,216,500 5,753,400 143 BOND/LOAN ISSUANCE COST - 75,000 144 TRANSFER TO PARKLAND RESERVE - 100,000 145 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 117,100 117,100 146 TOTALS $ 5,333,600 $ 5,945,500 147 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 148 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 149 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 150 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 3

151 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 152 GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY 153 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 154 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 155 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Hundred Sixty Seven Thousand Nine Hundred 156 dollars ($467,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 157 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 158 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 159 CASH RECEIPTS 160 2013/14 2014/15 161 REVISED BUDGET 162 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 734,000 $ 466,000 163 INTEREST EARNED 3,000 1,900 164 TOTALS $ 737,000 $ 467,900 165 EXPENSE SUMMARY 166 2013/14 2014/15 167 REVISED BUDGET 168 TRANSFER TO OPERATING ACCOUNT $ 271,000 $ - 169 170 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 466,000 467,900 171 TOTALS $ 737,000 $ 467,900 172 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 173 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 174 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 175 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 4

176 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 177 GENERAL CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 178 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 179 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 180 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Hundred Twelve Thousand Three Hundred dollars ($512,300) or 181 so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 182 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 183 beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 184 CASH RECEIPTS 185 2013/14 2014/15 186 REVISED BUDGET 187 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 507,300 $ 509,800 188 RECEIPTS 189 INTEREST EARNINGS 2,500 2,500 190 TOTAL RECEIPTS 2,500 2,500 191 TOTALS $ 509,800 $ 512,300 192 EXPENSE SUMMARY 193 2013/14 2014/15 194 REVISED BUDGET 195 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR $ 509,800 $ 512,300 196 TOTALS $ 509,800 $ 512,300 197 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 198 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 199 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 200 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 5

201 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 202 PARKLAND/RECREATION RESERVE 203 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 204 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 205 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Four Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars 206 ($304,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 207 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal 208 year beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 209 OPERATING REVENUES 210 2013/14 2014/15 211 REVISED BUDGET 212 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 202,900 $ 203,800 213 GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATION - 100,000 214 INTEREST INCOME 900 1,000 215 TOTALS $ 203,800 $ 304,800 216 OPERATING EXPENSES 217 2013/14 2014/15 218 REVISED BUDGET 219 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 203,800 304,800 220 TOTALS $ 203,800 $ 304,800 221 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 222 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 223 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 224 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 6

225 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 226 MUNICIPAL STREET AID FUND 227 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 228 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 229 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Six Hundred Sixty Four Thousand 230 dollars ($664,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 231 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 232 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 233 CASH RECEIPTS 234 2013/14 2014/15 235 REVISED BUDGET 236 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 251,500 $ 100 237 STATE GRANT - OPERATIONS 663,900 663,900 238 TOTALS $ 915,400 $ 664,000 239 BUDGET SUMMARY 240 2013/14 2014/15 241 REVISED BUDGET 242 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND - OPERATIONS $ 664,100 $ 663,900 243 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND - CAPITAL 251,200 - 244 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 100 100 245 TOTALS $ 915,400 $ 664,000 246 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 247 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 248 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 249 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 7

250 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 251 WATER/WASTEWATER FUND 252 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 253 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 254 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Fifteen Million Two Hundred Fifteen Thousand Three Hundred 255 dollars ($15,215,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 256 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 257 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 258 2013/14 2014/15 259 REVISED BUDGET 260 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 732,700 $ 658,400 261 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 441,400 (98,500) 262 BEGINNING BALANCE - KCSA (17,300) 155,000 263 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,156,800 714,900 264 BASE REVENUE 265 WATER FEES 4,396,000 4,616,400 266 WASTEWATER FEES 3,529,000 3,706,800 267 WASTEWATER ADJUSTMENT FEES 2,900,000 2,902,600 268 GROUNDWATER INFLOW ADJUSTMENT 1,302,300 1,862,500 269 WATER TANK SPACE LEASING 321,200 331,900 270 SEWER IMPACT FEES 237,900 427,900 271 WATER IMPACT FEES 262,700 472,700 272 INTEREST - WATER 3,900 9,000 273 INTEREST - WASTEWATER 6,100 14,000 274 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE 64,400 156,600 275 TOTAL REVENUES 13,023,500 14,500,400 276 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES AND REVENUES $ 14,180,300 $ 15,215,300 8

277 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 278 2013/14 2014/15 279 DIRECT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 280 ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ 499,000 $ 500,900 281 WATER CONSTRUCTION 340,800 252,500 282 WATER DEPARTMENT 474,700 485,300 283 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 1,495,200 1,576,900 284 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 885,700 974,100 285 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL 3,695,400 3,789,700 286 OTHER EXPENSES 287 DEBT SERVICE - WATER 403,800 534,100 288 DEBT SERVICE - WASTEWATER 603,400 617,900 289 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 200,000 200,000 290 OTHER EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES 10,800 17,700 291 KENT COUNTY TREATMENT CHARGE 4,030,000 3,655,000 292 INTRAFUND SERVICE FEES 1,458,800 1,354,900 293 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 6,706,800 6,379,600 294 TRANSFER TO 295 GENERAL FUND FROM WATER 250,000 250,000 296 GENERAL FUND FROM WASTEWATER 250,000 250,000 297 WATER IMP AND EXT 1,233,200 1,200,000 298 WASTEWATER IMP AND EXT 1,330,000 1,800,000 299 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 3,063,200 3,500,000 300 TOTAL EXPENSES 13,465,400 13,669,300 301 CURRENT YEAR BALANCES 302 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE WATER 658,400 1,020,100 303 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE WASTEWATER (98,500) (739,200) 304 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE KCSA 155,000 1,265,100 305 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 714,900 1,546,000 306 TOTAL CURRENT YEAR BALANCES AND EXPENSES $ 14,180,300 $ 15,215,300 307 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 308 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 309 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 310 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 9

311 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 312 WATER/WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION FUND 313 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 314 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 315 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Six Million Four Hundred Twenty One Thousand Eight Hundred 316 dollars ($6,421,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 317 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning 318 July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 319 CASH RECEIPTS 320 2013/14 2014/15 321 REVISED BUDGET 322 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 4,473,800 $ 1,021,200 323 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 2,807,000 1,060,000 324 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 7,280,800 2,081,200 325 RECEIPTS 326 BOND PROCEEDS - WATER - 2013 ISSUE 3,000,000 - 327 BOND PROCEEDS - WASTEWATER - 2013 ISSUE 1,067,900 - 328 STATE LOAN-WASTEWATER 2011 ISSUE 62,000 - 329 ARBITRAGE REBATE - IRS REFUND 66,000 - 330 TRANS FROM OPERATING FUND FOR WATER 1,233,200 1,200,000 331 TRANS FROM OPERATING FUND FOR WASTEWATER 1,330,000 1,800,000 332 TRANSFER FROM WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 1,000,000 1,315,600 333 INTEREST INCOME 25,000 25,000 334 TOTAL RECEIPTS 7,784,100 4,340,600 335 TOTALS $ 15,064,900 $ 6,421,800 336 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 337 EXPENSE SUMMARY 338 2013/14 2014/15 339 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 340 WATER $ 7,641,300 $ 1,336,900 341 WASTEWATER 5,252,400 3,277,200 342 WATER TREATMENT PLANT - 38,100 343 WATER CONSTRUCTION 90,000 - 344 TOTAL EXPENSES 12,983,700 4,652,200 345 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER 1,021,200 858,700 346 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 1,060,000 910,900 347 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 2,081,200 1,769,600 348 TOTALS $ 15,064,900 $ 6,421,800 349 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 350 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 351 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 352 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 10

353 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 354 WATER/WASTEWATER CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 355 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 356 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 357 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Forty Four Thousand Three Hundred Dollars 358 ($1,044,300) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 359 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 360 the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 361 CASH RECEIPTS 362 2013/14 2014/15 363 REVISED BUDGET 364 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 505,400 $ 514,000 365 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 504,300 512,900 366 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,009,700 1,026,900 367 RECEIPTS 368 INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 8,600 8,700 369 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 8,600 8,700 370 TOTAL RECEIPTS 17,200 17,400 371 TOTALS $ 1,026,900 $ 1,044,300 372 EXPENSE SUMMARY 373 2013/14 2014/15 374 REVISED BUDGET 375 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 514,000 $ 522,700 376 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 512,900 521,600 377 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,026,900 1,044,300 378 TOTALS $ 1,026,900 $ 1,044,300 379 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 380 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 381 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 382 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 11

383 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 384 WATER/WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 385 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 386 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 387 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Million Seventy One Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars 388 ($3,071,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 389 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 390 the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 391 CASH RECEIPTS 392 2013/14 2014/15 393 REVISED BUDGET 394 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 197,100 $ 200,500 395 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 3,756,100 2,820,000 396 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 3,953,200 3,020,500 397 RECEIPTS 398 INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 3,400 3,400 399 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 63,900 47,900 400 TOTAL RECEIPTS 67,300 51,300 401 TOTALS $ 4,020,500 $ 3,071,800 402 EXPENSE SUMMARY 403 2013/14 2014/15 404 REVISED BUDGET 405 TRANSFER TO I & E FUND FROM WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES $ 1,000,000 $ 1,315,600 405 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER 200,500 203,900 406 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 2,820,000 1,552,300 407 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 3,020,500 1,756,200 408 TOTALS $ 4,020,500 $ 3,071,800 409 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 410 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 411 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 412 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 12

413 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 414 WATER/WASTEWATER CONTINGENCY RESERVE 415 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 416 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 417 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Two Thousand Five Hundred dollars 418 ($302,500) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 419 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 420 beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 421 CASH RECEIPTS 422 2013/14 2014/15 423 REVISED BUDGET 424 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 104,100 $ 105,900 425 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 188,300 191,500 426 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 292,400 297,400 427 RECEIPTS 428 INTEREST EARNINGS 5,000 5,100 429 TOTAL RECEIPTS 5,000 5,100 430 TOTALS $ 297,400 $ 302,500 431 BUDGET SUMMARY 432 2013/14 2014/15 433 REVISED BUDGET 434 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER 105,900 107,700 435 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 191,500 194,800 436 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 297,400 302,500 437 TOTAL EXPENSES AND CURRENT YEAR BALANCES $ 297,400 $ 302,500 438 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 439 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 440 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 441 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 13

442 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 443 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND 444 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 445 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 446 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ninety One Million Five Hundred Sixty Thousand 447 One Hundred dollars ($91,560,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby 448 appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the 449 Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 450 2013/14 2014/15 451 REVISED BUDGET 452 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 6,620,900 $ 9,253,600 453 BASE REVENUE 454 DIRECT SALES TO CUSTOMER 78,971,700 78,043,000 455 UTILITY TAX 1,312,300 1,296,900 456 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 579,100 624,600 457 RENT REVENUE 180,000 200,000 458 GREEN ENERGY 130,000 130,000 459 INTEREST EARNINGS 12,000 12,000 460 TRANSFER FROM RATE STABILIZATION 7,000,000 2,000,000 461 INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS WATER/WASTEWATER 98,500 - 462 TOTAL REVENUES 88,283,600 82,306,500 463 TOTALS $ 94,904,500 $ 91,560,100 14

464 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND - CONTINUED 465 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 466 2013/14 2014/15 467 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 468 POWER SUPPLY $ 26,458,900 $ 21,823,000 469 SOLAR ENERGY 1,729,200 2,067,600 470 SOLAR RENEWAL ENERGY CREDITS 352,600 378,600 471 POWER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 996,000 996,000 472 PJM CHARGES - ENERGY 17,274,000 11,499,800 473 PJM CHARGES - TRANSMISSION & FEES 7,420,000 7,234,100 474 CAPACITY CHARGES 15,614,100 9,958,900 475 SUB-TOTAL POWER SUPPLY 69,844,800 53,958,000 476 PLANT OPERATIONS 5,791,600 6,141,100 477 GENERATIONS FUELS 1,603,800 1,611,100 478 PJM SPOT MARKET ENERGY (1,004,500) (2,232,800) 479 PJM CREDITS (5,314,800) (486,700) 480 CAPACITY CREDITS (15,079,800) (8,881,500) 481 GENERATION SUBTOTAL (14,003,700) (3,848,800) 482 POWER SUPPLY & GENERATION SUBTOTAL 55,841,100 50,109,200 483 DIRECT EXPENDITURES 484 TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION 3,776,300 4,028,700 485 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 1,285,300 1,370,900 486 ADMINISTRATION 628,400 636,600 487 METER READING 273,800 267,600 488 SYSTEMS OPERATIONS 675,800 686,300 489 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTALS 6,639,600 6,990,100 490 OTHER EXPENSES: 491 UTILITY TAX 1,312,300 1,296,900 492 ALLOW FOR UNCOLLECTIBLES 200,000 200,000 493 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100,000 246,800 494 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 513,300 513,300 495 OTHER EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES 125,700 54,200 496 OPEB UNFUNDED LIABILITY 975,700 1,009,800 497 GREEN ENERGY PAYMENT TO DEMEC 130,000 130,000 498 INTRAFUND SERVICE FEES 3,572,700 3,508,100 499 INTEREST ON DEPOSITS 20,000 20,000 500 INVENTORY WRITE OFFS - 175,000 501 DEBT SERVICE 3,301,900 3,297,000 502 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 10,251,600 10,451,100 503 TRANSFER TO 504 IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION 4,918,600 4,750,000 505 GENERAL FUND 8,000,000 10,000,000 506 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 12,918,600 14,750,000 507 TOTAL EXPENSES 85,650,900 82,300,400 508 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 9,253,600 9,259,700 509 TOTALS $ 94,904,500 $ 91,560,100 510 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 511 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 512 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 513 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 15

514 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 515 ELECTRIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION FUND 516 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 517 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 518 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Million Three Hundred Eighty Seven Thousand 519 dollars ($8,387,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 520 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 521 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 522 CASH RECEIPTS 523 2013/14 2014/15 524 REVISED BUDGET 525 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 3,868,500 $ 3,362,200 526 RECEIPTS 527 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC 4,918,600 4,750,000 528 GENERAL SERVICE BILLING 440,000 250,000 529 INTEREST EARNINGS 25,200 24,800 530 TOTAL RECEIPTS 5,383,800 5,024,800 531 TOTALS $ 9,252,300 $ 8,387,000 532 EXPENSE SUMMARY 533 2013/14 2014/15 534 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 535 ELECTRIC GENERATION $ 2,130,000 $ 2,240,000 536 TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION 1,144,600 1,061,700 537 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 2,615,500 1,663,100 538 TOTAL EXPENSES 5,890,100 4,964,800 539 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 3,362,200 3,422,200 540 TOTALS $ 9,252,300 $ 8,387,000 541 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 542 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 543 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 544 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 16

545 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 546 ELECTRIC UTILITY CONTINGENCY RESERVE 547 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 548 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 549 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Twenty Six Thousand dollars 550 ($826,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 551 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 552 beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 553 CASH RECEIPTS 554 2013/14 2014/15 555 REVISED BUDGET 556 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 814,200 $ 820,100 557 RECEIPTS 558 INTEREST EARNINGS 5,900 5,900 559 TOTAL RECEIPTS 5,900 5,900 560 TOTALS $ 820,100 $ 826,000 561 EXPENSE SUMMARY 562 2013/14 2014/15 563 REVISED BUDGET 563 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 820,100 826,000 564 TOTALS $ 820,100 $ 826,000 565 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 566 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 567 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 568 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 17

569 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 570 ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPRECIATION RESERVE 571 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2014-2015 572 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 573 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Nine Million Nine Hundred Ninety Eight Thousand 574 Two Hundred dollars ($9,998,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby 575 appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the 576 Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 577 CASH RECEIPTS 578 2013/14 2014/15 579 REVISED BUDGET 580 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 9,855,700 $ 9,898,000 581 INTEREST EARNINGS 42,300 100,200 582 TOTALS $ 9,898,000 $ 9,998,200 583 BUDGET SUMMARY 584 2013/14 2014/15 585 REVISED BUDGET 586 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 9,898,000 9,998,200 587 TOTALS $ 9,898,000 $ 9,998,200 588 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 589 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 590 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 591 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 18

592 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 593 ELECTRIC UTILITY FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE 594 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2014-2015 595 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 596 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ten Million One Hundred Forty Eight Thousand Seven Hundred 597 dollars ($10,148,700) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 598 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 599 beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 600 CASH RECEIPTS 601 2013/14 2014/15 602 REVISED BUDGET 603 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 10,004,200 $ 10,076,200 604 INTEREST EARNINGS 72,000 72,500 605 TOTALS $ 10,076,200 $ 10,148,700 606 BUDGET SUMMARY 607 2013/14 2014/15 608 REVISED BUDGET 609 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 10,076,200 10,148,700 610 TOTALS $ 10,076,200 $ 10,148,700 611 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 612 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 613 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 614 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 19

615 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 616 ELECTRIC UTILITY INSURANCE STABILIZATION RESERVE 617 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2014-2015 618 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 619 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Forty Three Thousand Six Hundred dollars 620 ($743,600) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 621 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 622 beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 623 CASH RECEIPTS 624 2013/14 2014/15 625 REVISED BUDGET 626 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 733,000 $ 738,300 627 INTEREST EARNINGS 5,300 5,300 628 TOTALS $ 738,300 $ 743,600 629 BUDGET SUMMARY 630 2013/14 2014/15 631 REVISED BUDGET 632 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 738,300 743,600 633 TOTALS $ 738,300 $ 743,600 634 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 635 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 636 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 637 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 20

638 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 639 ELECTRIC UTILITY RATE STABILIZATION RESERVE 640 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2014-2015 641 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 642 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ten Million Five Hundred Eighty Three Thousand 643 dollars ($10,583,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 644 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 645 the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 646 CASH RECEIPTS 647 2013/14 2014/15 648 REVISED BUDGET 649 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 17,382,100 $ 10,507,300 650 INTEREST EARNINGS 125,200 75,700 651 TOTALS $ 17,507,300 $ 10,583,000 652 BUDGET SUMMARY 653 2013/14 2014/15 654 REVISED BUDGET 655 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC FUND $ 7,000,000 $ 2,000,000 656 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 10,507,300 8,583,000 657 TOTALS $ 17,507,300 $ 10,583,000 658 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 659 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 660 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 661 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 21

662 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 663 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND 664 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 665 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 666 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Six Hundred Thirty Six Thousand One Hundred 667 dollars ($1,636,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 668 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 669 beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 670 OPERATING REVENUES 671 2013/14 2014/15 672 REVISED BUDGET 673 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 1,267,800 $ 1,135,000 674 INTEREST INCOME 10,600 10,600 675 PREMIUM FROM CITY 490,700 490,500 676 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 3,100 - 677 TOTALS $ 1,772,200 $ 1,636,100 678 OPERATING EXPENSES 679 2013/14 2014/15 680 REVISED BUDGET 681 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES - CLAIMS $ 450,000 $ 450,000 682 INSURANCE 92,600 92,600 683 BANK FEES 600 600 684 STATE OF DEL - SELF INSURANCE TAX 37,000 37,000 685 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 57,000 57,000 686 TOTAL EXPENSES 637,200 637,200 687 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 1,135,000 998,900 688 TOTALS $ 1,772,200 $ 1,636,100 689 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 690 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 691 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 692 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 22

693 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 694 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND 695 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 696 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 697 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Four Hundred 698 dollars ($579,400) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 699 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 700 beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 701 OPERATING REVENUES 702 2013/14 2014/15 703 REVISED BUDGET 704 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 209,200 $ 78,900 705 GRANTS REVENUE - DELDOT 1,387,600 500,000 706 INTEREST INCOME 500 500 707 TOTALS $ 1,597,300 $ 579,400 708 OPERATING EXPENSES 709 2013/14 2014/15 710 REVISED BUDGET 711 PROGRAM EXP. GRANT RELATED $ 1,395,100 $ 500,000 712 PROGRAM EXP. CITY APPROPRIATED 62,800 - 713 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT - GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 60,500 - 714 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 78,900 79,400 715 TOTALS $ 1,597,300 $ 579,400 716 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 717 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 718 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 719 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 23

720 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 721 LIBRARY GRANT FUND 722 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 723 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 724 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Ninety One Thousand Four Hundred dollars 725 ($291,400) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 726 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 727 beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 728 OPERATING REVENUES 729 2013/14 2014/15 730 REVISED BUDGET 731 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 27,800 $ 17,300 732 STATE GRANT 274,100 274,100 733 FEDERAL GRANT 2,500 - 734 TOTALS $ 304,400 $ 291,400 735 OPERATING EXPENSES 736 2013/14 2014/15 737 REVISED BUDGET 738 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES $ 4,700 $ 2,000 739 OFFICE SUPPLIES 24,000 24,000 740 PRINTING/DUPLICATING 8,900 8,900 741 POSTAGE 28,000 28,000 742 BOOKS 128,900 128,900 743 FURNITURE 74,000 74,000 744 AUDIO VISUAL SUPPLIES 100 100 745 TRAINING/CONF/FOOD/TRAV 3,500 3,500 746 OFFICE EQUIPMENT/REPAIRS & MAINT 2,000 2,000 747 COMPUTER HARDWARE - 2,700 748 OTHER EQUIP - PURCHASE 10,500 - 749 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES STATE GRANTS 284,600 274,100 750 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 2,500 - 751 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES FEDERAL GRANTS 2,500 - 752 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 17,300 17,300 753 TOTALS $ 304,400 $ 291,400 754 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 755 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 756 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 757 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 24

758 2014-2015 BUDGET ORDINANCES - CONTINUED 759 POLICE GRANTS FUND 760 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2014-2015 761 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 762 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Hundred Sixteen Thousand Two Hundred dollars 763 ($416,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 764 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 765 beginning July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015: 766 OPERATING EXPENSES 767 2013/14 2014/15 768 REVISED BUDGET 769 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 175,200 $ 77,200 770 STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS 390,500 339,000 771 TOTALS $ 565,700 $ 416,200 772 OPERATING EXPENSES 773 2013/14 2014/15 774 REVISED BUDGET 775 POLICE EQUIPT & PROG SUPP 224,700 156,000 776 TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT 60,000 50,000 777 CELL PHONE CHARGES 15,000 15,000 778 TRAINING 36,000 32,000 779 AUDIT FEES 1,000 1,000 780 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - 6,000 781 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES 336,700 260,000 782 OPERATING TRANSFERS-OUT 151,800 124,000 783 SUBTOTAL FINANCING USES 151,800 124,000 784 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 77,200 32,200 785 TOTALS $ 565,700 $ 416,200 786 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. 787 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 788 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 789 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. 790 ADOPTED: JUNE 23, 2014 25

SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING A Special Council Meeting was held on June 25, 2014 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Bonar presiding. Members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Lynn, Mr. Perza, Mr. Slavin, Mrs. Williams, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Council staff members present were Police Chief Bernat, Mr. Koenig, Mrs. Townshend, and Ms. Devine. Council staff members absent were Mrs. Mitchell, Fire Chief Carey, City Solicitor Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Mr. Bonar noted that Robin R. Christiansen had served the City well over the years and expressed his pleasure in welcoming him back as Mayor, noting that this would be a new chapter for the City. The invocation was given by Vy. Reverend James S. Lentini, V.F., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the agenda as presented, seconded by Mrs. Williams and unanimously carried. Oath of Office Administered by The Honorable Kenneth S. Clark, Jr., Judge, Court of Common Pleas The Honorable Kenneth S. Clark, Jr., Judge of the Court of Common Pleas, administered the Oath of Office to Robin R. Christiansen. Mr. Bonar congratulated Mayor Christiansen and commented on their history of working together, along with Mr. Hutchison, and expressed his appreciation for the service so many give to the City. He stated his pleasure at having Mayor Christiansen in office and noted that he was looking forward to working together with the Mayor’s Office for the betterment of the City. Mr. Bonar also acknowledged that the campaign had been “tough” but noted that, once the election is over, everyone works as a team. Photographs (Mayor and Council) There being no objections, Council President Bonar declared that the meeting would recess for photographs of the Mayor and members of City Council. Meeting recessed at 7:38 p.m. By unanimous consent, the meeting was reconvened at 7:45 p.m. Mayor Christiansen recognized his mother in the audience, stating that without her and his father, he would not be where he is today. He indicated that he had learned a lot from his parents, noting in particular their motto of “service to others” which he had passed on to his children, hoping that they would do the same. Mayor Christiansen stated that he moved to Dover from Philadelphia when he was a child and fell in love with the City, and it was this love affair with the City that motivated him to return to serve in office. In closing, Mayor Christiansen again applauded his mother, stating that all that he is or ever will be was because of her.

SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 25, 2014 PAGE 2 Mr. Lynn addressed Mayor Christiansen, reflecting fondly on time that their respective families had shared together. Mr. Lynn thanked Mayor Christiansen, stating that he would be coming into an office that had a cloud over it that was not his doing. He expressed his hope that, as Mayor of the City of Dover, Mr. Christiansen would be able to bring honor, integrity, and service back to the office and his confidence, having known him his entire life, that he would be able to do so. Mr. Slavin congratulated Mayor Christiansen and welcomed him back to the City. He recounted a conversation he had with his father-in-law on the evening preceding the election as they shared some thoughts on the various candidates. Mr. Slavin pointed out Councilman David Anderson’s service to his country, as well as to the City, and his father-in-law commented that there were two (2) true patriots running in this race, Mr. Robin R. Christiansen and Mr. David L. Anderson. He stated that this was a good way to summarize the candidates, noting that his father-in-law had known Mr. Christiansen for a long time and that he had been a patriot to the City for many years. Mr. Slavin thanked Mayor Christiansen and all of the candidates who ran in the race, stating that it was a race marked by its civility, and he expressed his hope to continue that course as everyone works together for the City. Mrs. Williams welcomed Mayor Christiansen, noting a job well done. Mr. Hare welcomed Mayor Christiansen, noting his history of working with Mr. Christiansen in the 1990s. Mr. Hutchison welcomed Mayor Christiansen and stated that he was confident that, with the Mayor’s leadership and the participation of staff and the citizens of Dover, everyone working together could move the City forward in meeting the challenges that lie ahead. Responding, Mayor Christiansen thanked Mr. Hutchison and expressed his belief that the City will do great things with everyone working together and following the City’s motto of “Community Excellence through Quality Service.” Mr. Christiansen expressed his hope to make this next year one of the greatest. Mr. Dixon stated that, although he was a newcomer to the City, as former City Chaplain, he was familiar with Mayor Christiansen’s contributions to the City and thanked him for being on board. Mr. Perza welcomed Mayor Christiansen, congratulated him on his election, and wished him success in accomplishing all of his goals. Mr. Anderson congratulated Mayor Christiansen, stating that he was looking forward to working with him for the betterment of the City. Mr. Anderson said that he was familiar with the work Mayor Christiansen had done and recognized his wealth of experience and the value that he would bring to the City. Council President Bonar welcomed the Kent County Levy Court Commissioners who were present, Mr. Terry Pepper, At-Large Commissioner, and Mr. Allan Angel, Third District Commissioner, as well Mrs. Nancy Wagner, former State Representative and active member in the community.

SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 25, 2014 PAGE 3 Mayor Christiansen thanked his wife, children, cousins, and all of his family for attending the meeting. By unanimous consent, the meeting adjourned at 7:52 p.m. DENISE L. DEVINE ASSISTANT CITY CLERK All orders, ordinances, and resolutions adopted by City Council during their Special Meeting of June 25, 2014 are hereby approved. ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /DD S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Council-Minutes\2014\06-25-2014 SPECIAL.wpd

PETITION TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT Report to the Dover City Council July 14, 2014 Proposed Change: Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 Sections 10-16 and 26 pertaining to District Regulations, Article 4 Sections 4.14 and 4.15 pertaining to Bulk and Parking Regulations, Article 10 Section 2 pertaining to Site Development Plan approval, and Article 12 Definitions. The proposed ordinance revisions are the result of numerous consultations with the business and real estate community to simplify zones, generalize certain use categories, and provide more flexibility in site design. Summary of Amendment: The City Planner has been meeting with a group of representatives of the business and real estate community convened by the Central Delaware Chamber of Commerce since late 2012 to review the commercial, office and industrial zones in the City in an effort to simplify the zones, create more generalized use categories, provide more flexibility in site design by adjusting bulk standards, and make the zones more business friendly. The proposed ordinance reflects the proposed changes to Zoning Ordinance as a result of this effort. The changes include revisions to Article 3- District Regulations, Article 4- Zoning Bulk and Parking Regulations, Article 10- Planning Commission, and Article 12- Definitions. The proposed changes to Article 10 would increase the thresholds for projects that require Planning Commission review. For building additions, Planning Commission review would be required for additions of more than 15% of the floor area. Staff Amendment #1 clarifies some of the language and makes some technical corrections to the ordinance. Planning Commission Recommendation: Following a public hearing before the Planning Commission on June 16, 2014, where one member of the public spoke in favor of the proposed amendments, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the ordinance, including Staff Amendment #1, to City Council. An excerpt of the draft minutes from the Planning Commission meeting is attached. Ordinance Number: 2014-08 File Number: MI-14-10

Excerpt from DRAFT Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 16, 2014 4) MI-14-10 Text Amendment: Revisions to Commercial and Office Zones – Public Hearing Review for Recommendation to City Council on Text Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 Sections 10-16 and 26 pertaining to District Regulations, Article 4 Sections 4.14 and 4.15 pertaining to Bulk and Parking Regulations, Article 10 Section 2 pertaining to Site Development Plan approval, and Article 12 Definitions. The proposed ordinance revisions are the result of numerous consultations with the business and real estate community to simplify zones, generalize certain use categories, and provide more flexibility in site design. Ordinance #2014-08. The Parks Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee reviewed the Proposed Text Amendment on April 28 and May 12, 2014. The first Reading of this Proposed Text Amendment was completed by City Council on May 27, 2014. The Proposed Text Amendment is available on the City’s website www.cityofdover.com under the “Government” heading, link to “Ordinances, Resolutions and Tributes” or you may contact the Planning Office for a copy of the Proposed Text Amendment. Representatives: None Mrs. Townshend stated this is a series of amendments to all of the Commercial and Office Zones within the Zoning Ordinance, minus the Recreational and Commercial Zone and the Shopping Center Zones. The ordinance came about through a series of meetings. About two years ago, Planning Staff brought forward amendments to the Sign Regulations that were amended in conjunction with the business community. This is the next phase of their working relationship through the Chamber with the real estate and business community. They have been meeting about these zones since the end of 2012. They have gone through all of the Commercial and Office Zones; both the uses and the bulk standards with a fine tooth comb. There have been a number of things that they have tried to do in this review. They are trying to make the categories more general and use specific. One example that she typically uses is currently the C-3 (Service Commercial Zone) allows bowling alleys. That’s great but what about laser tag or an indoor batting cage? Something that would be another type of indoor amusement or recreational facility but it’s not a bowling alley. They used broader language. Where a lot of zones refer back to others (ex. C-1A (Limited Commercial Zone) refers back to C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone), C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) refers back to C- 1A (Limited Commercial Zone) which refers back to C-1(Neighborhood Commercial Zone), there is a lot of flipping through the Code when trying to figure out what can be done in a certain zone. What they have done is made sure that they capture all of those uses rather than just referring to the other zones so that the Zoning Ordinance is easier to read. In doing that, they also tried to make sure that there’s a better separation between what can be done in C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone) versus what can be done in C-1A (Limited Commercial Zone), versus what can be done in C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone); seeing those as kind of progressive starting from C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone) to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) which is less than Highway Commercial but a little more intense than C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone) or C-1A (Limited Commercial Zone). They tried to really break out that progression of what’s prohibited and what’s permitted in each zone so that there is a continuum of zones. Her experience is that there is not a lot of difference between C-1A (Limited Commercial Zone) and C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) right now. It really struck her when they looked at the Comprehensive Plan Amendment proposal by Mr. Ashburn that they couldn’t put a zoning classification if someone wanted to do commercial there. There was no zoning classification that would allow some sort of commercial activity and retail activity but also prohibit gas pumps. They fixed this issue where C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone) and C-1A (Limited Commercial Zone) expressly prohibit gas pumps. C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) is how it is now, where someone would be able to get gas pumps as a conditional use similar to the way Wawa and Royal Farms was done.

In terms of the Bulk Standards, they have tried to relax the Bulk Standards to allow property owners and their design staff to come up with a design that works for the site and isnt based on setbacks. They pulled the setbacks back to what was really needed to adequately buffer the property from another property so that is doesn’t cause people to design in a building envelope that might not make as much sense as if they had more flexibility on the site. The next piece was changing the threshold for what comes to Planning Commission versus what can be done administratively. The Commissioners have an amendment (Staff Amendment #1) on their desks. In terms of the changing of the thresholds, she would specifically look at the amendments because Mr. Perza, who is a member of the Parks Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee and a member of City Council, was concerned that the wording in the ordinance as proposed could be confusing. Coming out of the First Reading, they worked to break that out. What is proposed now is new structures of 5,000 square feet or greater would come to the Planning Commission; currently it’s 3,000 square feet. Additions to existing structures that constitute 15% or more of the existing floor area and are greater than 5,000 square feet in new floor area would come to the Planning Commission. Impervious cover additions don’t change and disturbance adjacent to residential would increase from 1,500 square feet to 2,500 square feet. In terms of additions to existing structures, the example she uses is Proctor and Gamble. They have an 800,000 square foot facility. It gives more flexibility where the proportionality of it is so small at 3,000 square feet or 5,000 square feet they have to come to the Planning Commission. They are referring to 1% of their floor area or less. The idea is that it would come to the Planning Commission when it reaches a proportion of the existing square footage that would be noticed. With any Administrative Site Plan, if there is something that makes staff uncomfortable it can be brought before the Planning Commission; this is already in the Ordinance. The idea is that some of these very large facilities that are doing something minuscule in comparison to what they have there could really go through an administrative process. The last piece of this Text Amendment is adding some definitions of things that are currently not in the Zoning Ordinance (ex. personal service establishments, place of public assembly, restaurant, retail, service establishment, vocational training). They also added definitions for transitional housing and emergency shelters which are not addressed in this ordinance but at some point they do look to bring forward an ordinance under other circumstances that would help to address these because emergency shelter and transitional housing are kind of absent from the Zoning Ordinance in terms of how they are supposed to deal with them. They want to make sure that it’s clear that those facilities are permitted and in which zones they would be permitted in. That’s a different ordinance for a different day but since they were working on definitions they added these definitions. Removing the words “and outdoor sales areas” from line 33 just acknowledges that they are working in a zone that does not allow retail so they don’t need to talk about outdoor sales areas. Line 95: they had taken out the allowance of fuel pumps as a conditional use in the C-1A (Limited Commercial Zone) but they thought that since they were prohibiting other motor vehicle uses they should make it clear that fuel pumps would also be prohibited in that zone. Amendment (item) 3 refers to C-2 (Central Commercial Zone) which is the Downtown zone which again the idea is that fuel pumps shouldn’t be right on Loockerman Street in that C-2 (Central Commercial Zone) area. Amendment (item) 4 removed the language where it refers to another zone and adds that language into it. There is also a correction to the definition of retail because the definition that was in there could in theory, prohibit something like a Sam’s Club because it says directly to the ultimate consumer or persons without a resale license and at some of the box stores, things are resold. This was just more to clarify retail is where someone is selling to a consumer; it’s not a wholesale facility.

The one issue that did come up among the Planning Staff and she wasn’t able to figure out how or if they needed to do an amendment, was the issue of parking in the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone), C-1A (Limited Commercial Zone) and C-2 (Central Commercial Zone). It used to be that there was no parking requirement at all in the C-2 (Central Commercial Zones). In 2007, they added 1/2 space per 300 square feet for new construction. A lot of the discussion in the Dover Transit Center Neighborhood Plan talks about not requiring parking as a site by site basis but pushing toward large public parking facilities. The idea is that they should not necessarily require flat surface parking in their Downtown. With the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zones) and C-1A (Limited Commercial Zones), these are Neighborhood Commercial facilities so what they are proposing at this point is taking the parking requirement out. There is language in Article 10 of the Zoning Ordinance as it relates to Site Plans that states, “In considering and acting upon Site Development Plans, the public health safety and welfare, the comfort and convenience of the public in general and of residents in the immediate neighborhood in particular shall be taken into consideration. Appropriate conditions and safe guards may be prescribed as may be required that the results of approval may to the maximum extent possible. Further, the expressed intent of this ordinance and accomplishment of the following objectives in particular.” She thinks that the discretion is in the Zoning Ordinance for the Planning Commission. If a C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone) site came to the Commission to build something new and they knew that there was a parking issue in the area, it could be dealt with based on the language in the Code. For instance, the Grocery Basket is an area that the residential areas could propose and go through the application process for C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone). If there was a neighborhood store like that where the intent is really to get your neighbors to walk to the corner store but there is a parking requirement it could make it out of character with that area. The idea is by eliminating it, it could be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. If there’s public testimony that there are concerns or if it’s in an area where there is no on-street parking and there is no way that it would work or there is no public parking, it could be added as a condition. From a market standpoint, any business owner is going to want to make sure whether the parking is on their site, on the street or at a lot down the road that people can conveniently access their stores. The idea is that it allows the discretion but doesn’t lock them into a parking requirement that could be out of character with the surrounding area. Mrs. Townshend stated that Mr. Scott Kidner, Mr. Phil McGinnis and Mr. Tom Burns are here this evening. They have worked with her along with Ms. Judy Diego, Mr. Connie Malmberg, Mr. John Paradee, Mr. Keith Kooker and Mr. Bob MacLeish. They have all been very helpful in helping to move this forward and have been reasonable when she has stood her ground on things that she did not think things were necessarily an improvement of the ordinance. She has worked on the amendments to the ordinance very vigorously with these people and she is comfortable, not that they can anticipate all unintended consequences but she thinks that it does set things up to be more streamlined, easier to understand and to allow the property owner and their designer flexibility to do something that works for a site. Colonel Welsh stated that this is something that he thinks is long overdue. It simplifies the process, streamlines the process and makes it a whole lot easier for the business community to get things done. He commended those who worked on this project for their work as well as the Planning Staff for their hard work in getting this done. Hopefully, this is going to make it easier for everybody including the Planning Commission. Mr. Holden stated that he agreed with Colonel Welsh’s comments. He thinks that these are good changes that are going to help our community. Mr. Cregar questioned if the change in the square footage would cause any issues for Planning Staff? Responding to Mr. Cregar, Mrs. Townshend stated no. Staff has brought things forward to the Planning Commission before that they thought didn’t need to be seen by the Commission.

Mr. Cregar further questioned if the Jolly Joe’s application from tonight would have been handled administratively? Responding to Mr. Cregar, Mrs. Townshend stated that it could have been. Under the proposed changes to the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone), the liquor store wouldn’t be permitted but it is legal non-conforming. But yes, something like that would not have to come to the Planning Commission. Mr. Holt stated that it was long overdue. Dr. Jones questioned if the Jolly Joe’s application was handled by Staff, does that mean there is no public hearing? Responding to Dr. Jones, Mrs. Townshend stated yes, for an Administrative Plan there is no public hearing. Mr. Holden questioned if the application was handled administratively but the applicant is asking for curb or fencing waivers? Responding to Mr. Holden, Mrs. Townshend stated that the waivers would have to come to the Planning Commission. Staff has seen a few of those applications before where otherwise they wouldn’t need to come before the Planning Commission. Colonel Welsh opened the public hearing. Mr. Phil McGinnis – 555 East Loockerman Street Dover DE 19901 Mr. McGinnis stated that on behalf of his colleagues present tonight and those who didn’t bother to come out this evening he wants to thank everyone for the consideration of these changes. Mrs. Townshend is correct, they being gentlemen they didn’t wrestle her to the floor when they felt strongly on issues that they wanted to change. They reached amicable consensus and arm wrestled. Certainly, they approve the changes; they want to be on the record as supporting the changes. It isn’t much of a public hearing when there is no public here. He thinks that these changes to these districts sort of move them towards smart growth development. It adds some great changes; they will be the envy of the League of Local Governments with these changes. He whole heartedly asks the Commission to support them unanimously. Mr. Cregar stated that it seemed like Dr. Jones had some reservation earlier. He questioned if she got answered what she needed answered? Responding to Mr. Cregar, Dr. Jones stated that there was an answer to her questions. Take a project that is going to go into a residential facility or very near residential. Mrs. Townshend stated that if something is adjacent to residential that threshold is lowered to 2,500 square feet of disturbance. It could be a small building but if they are added parking and the parking area and the building add up to 2,500 square feet that’s a pretty low threshold. If it’s adjacent to residential, they have a lower threshold to get to Planning Commission for that reason. One thing that it does in the C-2 (Central Commercial Zone), which is the Downtown zone, is that personal service establishments and offices would no longer be conditional uses. Things like Janaid’s, Bee Hive Salon, EZ Pass, Joe Petrosky’s request for offices in the Loockerman Exchange would be allowed. The idea of that is that it’s really the form over the function. Mr. McGinnis talked about moving towards smart growth. She doesn’t think they are ready for a form based code where it’s more about the building representation to the street and more on subjective standards. The idea with the form based code is that they are not as worried about what’s happening in the buildings as long as they’re not incompatible with what the character of the area is. They are looking at how the buildings present themselves. So whether it’s an office behind that wall or a salon or restaurant isn’t as important as what that wall looks like. Colonel Welsh closed the public hearing.

Mrs. Townshend stated that the Commission should probably do a separate motion on the amendment (Staff Amendment #1) and then a motion on the ordinance unless they want to do the ordinance with the amendment (Staff Amendment #1). Colonel Welsh stated to do the amendment (Staff Amendment #1) with the ordinance because it is all part of the package. Mr. Cregar questioned if they were satisfied with the parking question? Responding to Mr. Cregar, Mrs. Townshend stated that she can live with it. Again, she can’t sit here and tell the Commission won’t at some point have an unintended consequence but she does believe that there is flexibility in the Zoning Ordinance that they can deal with the issue. Mr. Cregar further questioned if at some point Staff questions something could it come to the Planning Commission for review? Responding to Mr. Cregar, Mrs. Townshend stated yes. Any Administrative Site Plan can be referred to the Planning Commission. Ms. Still moved to recommend approval to City Council for MI-14-10 Text Amendment: Revisions to Commercial and Office Zones as listed in the agenda and inclusive of Staff Amendment #1, seconded by Mr. Holt and the motion carried by roll call vote 9-0 Mr. Holden voting yes, as per the discussion and due to the fact that these changes are going to help streamline some processes and applications within our community. Mr. Cregar voting yes, this provides us with a better and improved process for these business and institutional office zones. Mr. Tolbert voting yes, this change does facilitate a user friendly approach to their work and it’s something that was very much needed. Mr. Holt voting yes, the amendment to the Commercial and Office Zones will help to streamline the operations for the Planning Commission. Mr. Baldwin voting yes, based on the information provided this evening and to help streamline the process. Dr. Jones voting yes, in concurrence with the previous comments supporting the changes. Ms. Still voting yes, in concurrence with all the reasons cited previously. Mr. Ambruso voting yes, based on all the comments previously stated. Colonel Welsh voting yes, for reasons that have been previously stated and once again thanking Mrs. Townshend, Planning Staff, Mr. McGinnis, Mr. Burns and everybody on the business side who participated in this; a win-win for the city and for the business community.

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 WITH SA#1 (Staff Amendments Indicated in Yellow Highlight) BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 10 – Institutional and Office Zone (IO) be amended by deleting it in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 1 Section 10. Institutional and office zone (IO). 2 10.1 Uses permitted. In an institutional and office zone (IO), no building or premises shall 3 be used, and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, 4 intended, or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except the 5 following: 6 (a) Business, professional, or governmental offices. 7 (b) Banks. 8 (c) Research, design, and development laboratories. 9 (d) Public and institutional uses including hospitals, medical clinics, libraries, police 10 stations, courthouses, transit centers, schools, colleges, universities, places of 11 public assembly, philanthropic and charitable institutions, parks, playgrounds, 12 public indoor recreation centers, athletic fields. 13 (e) Public utility rights-of-way and structures necessary to serve areas within the 14 city. 15 (f) Day care centers, provided they are established in accordance with all 16 applicable state regulations pertaining to child care and provided that they are 17 established and maintained in accordance with article 5, section 14 of this 18 ordinance. 19 (g) Emergency shelters and transitional housing. 20 10.2 Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of 21 the planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general 22 conditions set forth in article 10, section 1: 23 (a) Firearm ranges, prisons, and correctional facilities. 24 (b) Public incinerators. 25 (c) Hotels and restaurants. 26 10.3 Accessory uses. The following uses shall be permitted accessory to other permitted uses 27 on a lot. 28 (a) Clinics, cafeterias, and recreational facilities. 29 (b) Motor vehicle storage and repair facilities accessory to a public or institutional 30 use. 31 (c) Restaurants that are on a campus and intended to support users of the campus. 32 10.4 Uses prohibited. The following uses are prohibited:

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 2 33 (a) Landfills, dumps. 34 10.5 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than off- 35 street parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for 36 outdoor eating areas associated with restaurants and outdoor sales areas approved by the 37 city planner. 38 10.6 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in 39 article 5, section 8.1. 40 10.7 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with 41 article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for 42 the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of 43 occupancy for any change of use. 44 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 45 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 11 – Neighborhood 46 Commercial Zone (C-1) be amended by deleting it in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the 47 following: 48 Section 11. Neighborhood commercial zone (C-1). 49 11.1 Uses permitted. In a neighborhood commercial zone (C-1), no building or premises shall 50 be used, and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, 51 intended, or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except the 52 following: 53 (a) Retail stores. 54 (b) Personal service establishments. 55 (c) Service establishments. 56 (d) Restaurants. 57 (e) One family residences, including attached and semi-detached dwellings, 58 complying with the bulk standards of the RG-1 (General Residence) zone. 59 (f) Apartments and multi-family dwellings. 60 11.2 Uses prohibited. The following uses are prohibited: 61 (a) Fuel pumps; motor vehicle storage, sales, or repairs. 62 (b) Drive-throughs. 63 (c) Liquor stores. 64 (d) Fire arm sales 65 (e) Tobacco shops. 66 11.3 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than off- 67 street parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for 68 outdoor eating areas associated with restaurants and outdoor sales areas approved by the 69 city planner.

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 3 70 11.4 Floor area. The total floor area in any one establishment shall not exceed 2,500 square 71 feet. 72 11.5 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in 73 article 5, section 8.1. 74 11.6 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with 75 article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for 76 the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of 77 occupancy for any change of use. 78 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 79 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 12 – Limited Commercial Zone 80 (C-1A) be amended by deleting it in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 81 Section 12. Limited commercial zone (C-1A) 82 12.1 Uses permitted. In a limited commercial zone (C-1A), no building or premises shall be 83 used, and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, intended, 84 or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except the following: 85 (a) Retail stores. 86 (b) Personal service establishments. 87 (c) Service establishments. 88 (d) Restaurants. 89 (e) Business, professional, and governmental offices. 90 (f) One family residences, including attached and semi-detached dwellings, 91 complying with the bulk standards of the RG-1 (General Residence) zone. 92 (g) Apartments and multi-family dwellings. 93 12.2 Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the 94 planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general 95 conditions set forth in article 10, section 1: 96 (a) Drive-throughs accessory to a permitted use. 97 12.3 Uses prohibited. The following uses are prohibited: 98 (a) Fuel pumps and Motor vehicle storage, sales, or repairs. 99 12.4 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than off- 100 street parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for 101 outdoor eating areas associated with restaurants and outdoor sales areas approved by the 102 city planner. 103 12.5 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in 104 article 5, section 8.1.

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 4 105 12.6 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with 106 article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for 107 the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of 108 occupancy for any change of use. 109 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 110 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 13 – Central Commercial Zone 111 (C-2) be amended by deleting it in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 112 Section 13. Central commercial zone (C-2). 113 13.1 Uses permitted. In a central commercial zone (C-2), no building or premises shall be 114 used, and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, intended, 115 or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except the following: 116 (a) Retail stores. 117 (b) Restaurants. 118 (c) Hotels, including bed and breakfast inns. 119 (d) Art galleries and studios. 120 (e) Service establishments. 121 (f) Personal service establishments. 122 (g) Business, professional, and government offices. 123 (h) Apartments and multi-family dwellings, provided that no dwelling units shall 124 be permitted in the first floor on the street frontage of Loockerman Street. 125 13.2 Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the 126 planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general 127 conditions set forth in article 10, section 1: 128 (a) Parking lots and parking structures as a principal use. 129 (b) Places of public assembly. 130 (c) Manufacturing, assembling, converting, altering, finishing, cleaning, or any other 131 processing of products where goods so produced or processed are to be sold at 132 retail exclusively on the premises, provided that: 133 (1) An area fully concealed from any street and equal to not more than 20 134 percent of the area devoted to retail sales shall be so used; 135 (2) Electrical power not to exceed a total of five rated horsepower, and steam 136 pressure not in excess of 60 pounds of pressure per square inch shall be used 137 exclusively; 138 (3) Not more than four (4) employees are engaged in such production or 139 processing. 140 13.3 Uses prohibited. The following uses are prohibited: 141 (a) Fuel pumps and motor vehicle storage, sales, or repairs.

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 5 142 13.34 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than off- 143 street parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for 144 outdoor eating areas associated with restaurants and outdoor sales areas approved by the 145 city planner. 146 13.45 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in 147 article 5, section 8.1. 148 13.56 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with 149 article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for 150 the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of 151 occupancy for any change of use. 152 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 153 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 14 – Limited Central 154 Commercial Zone (C-2A) be amended by deleting it in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the 155 following: 156 Section 14. Limited central commercial zone (C-2A). 157 14.1 Uses permitted. In a limited central commercial zone (C-2A), no building or premises 158 shall be used, and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, 159 intended, or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except the 160 following: 161 (a) Retail stores. 162 (b) Business, professional or governmental offices. 163 (c) Personal service establishments. 164 (d) Restaurants. 165 (e) Service establishments. 166 (f) Hotels. 167 (g) Places of public assembly. 168 (h) Drive-throughs. 169 (i) One (1) family residences, including attached and semi-detached dwellings, 170 complying with the bulk standards of the RG-1 (General Residence) zone. 171 (j) Apartments and multi-family dwellings. 172 14.2 Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the 173 planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general 174 conditions set forth in article 10, section 1: 175 (a) Parking lots and parking structures as a principal use on suitably landscaped lots. 176 (b) Fuel pumps accessory to a permitted use. 177 14.3 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than off- 178 street parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for 179 outdoor eating areas associated with restaurants and outdoor sales areas approved by the 180 city planner.

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 6 181 14.4 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in 182 article 5, section 8.1. 183 14.5 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with 184 article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for 185 the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of 186 occupancy for any change of use. 187 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 188 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 15 – Service Commercial Zone 189 (C-3) be amended by deleting it in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 190 Section 15. Service commercial zone (C-3). 191 15.1 Uses permitted. In a service commercial zone (C-3), no building or premises shall be 192 used, and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, intended, 193 or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except the following: 194 (a) Service establishments. 195 (b) Personal service establishments. 196 (c) Business, professional or governmental offices. 197 (d) Retail uses accessory to a permitted use. 198 (e) Drive-throughs accessory to a permitted use. 199 (f) Wholesale, storage, and warehousing establishments. 200 (g) Indoor recreation and amusement establishments. 201 (h) Motor vehicle, boat, or farm equipment sales or service, subject to the following 202 regulations: 203 (1) The minimum lot size for such establishments shall be 20,000 square feet, 204 and the minimum street frontage shall be 150 feet. 205 (2) Entrance and exit driveways shall have an unrestricted width of not less than 206 16 feet, shall be located not nearer than ten feet from any property line and 207 shall be so laid out as to avoid the necessity of any vehicle leaving the 208 property to back out across any public right-of-way or portion thereof. 209 (3) Vehicle lifts or pits, dismantled and disabled automobiles and all parts or 210 supplies shall be located within a building enclosed on all sides. 211 (4) All service or repair of motor vehicles, other than such minor servicing as 212 change of tires or sale of gasoline or oil, shall be conducted in a building 213 fully enclosed on all sides. This requirement shall not be construed to mean 214 that the doors to any repair shop must be kept closed at all times. 215 (5) The storage of gasoline or flammable oils in bulk shall be located fully 216 underground in accordance with applicable provisions of the National Fire 217 Protection Association Code. 218 (6) No fuel pumps shall be located nearer than 15 feet to any street line. 219 (7) Fuel pumps shall not be permitted closer than 100 feet from a property line 220 of any school, day care, church, hospital, nursing home, or place of public 221 assembly designed for the simultaneous use and occupancy by more than 100 222 persons.

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 7 223 (i) Manufacturing, assembling, converting, altering, finishing, cleaning or any other 224 processing of products for sale on or off the premises, provided that not more than 225 25 persons shall be engaged in such activity; and provided further, that any such 226 use shall be subject to the performance standards procedure as set forth in article 5, 227 section 8. 228 (j) Mini-storage facilities, subject to the following regulations: 229 (1) No unit shall be placed within 30 feet of a residential property line. 230 (2) No outside storage, except for recreational vehicles, boats, or personal 231 automobiles when parked in specifically approved locations. Parking for 232 these vehicles shall not count toward the required parking set forth in 233 subsection (e) below. 234 (3) No individual unit may be used for retail, garage sale or any other 235 commercial activities. 236 (4) No storage of flammable, explosive, corrosive or other hazardous products 237 may occur in the individual unit. 238 (5) Parking must be provided at a ratio of one (1) space for each 25 rental units, 239 plus a minimum of three (3) spaces for an office outside of the enclosure. 240 15.2 Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the 241 planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general 242 conditions set forth in article 10, section 1: 243 (a) Crematory, subject to the following requirements: 244 (1) The building lot line upon which a crematory is to be established shall be 245 located at least 100 feet from any residential zone. 246 (2) Where adjacent to residential zones, all landscape buffers shall be required. 247 The buffer shall consist of a landscape screen no less than six and one half 248 (6½) feet high. All landscaping shall be properly maintained throughout the 249 life of the use on lot. 250 (3) Loading operations shall be conducted within a completely enclosed 251 building. Location of loading doors shall be at the side or rear of the building. 252 (4) The crematory shall comply with the Delaware Incinerator Regulations. A 253 copy of the approved air pollution permit issued by the State of Delaware 254 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control shall 255 accompany the application for a certificate of occupancy. 256 15.3 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than off- 257 street parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for 258 outdoor eating areas associated with restaurants and outdoor sales areas approved by the 259 city planner. 260 15.4 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in 261 article 5, section 8.1. 262 15.5 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with 263 article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for 264 the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of 265 occupancy for any change of use.

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 8 266 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 267 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 16 – Highway Commercial 268 Zone (C-4) be amended by deleting it in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 269 Section 16. Highway commercial zone (C-4). 270 16.1 Uses permitted. In a highway commercial zone (C-4), no building or premises shall be 271 used, and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, intended, 272 or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except the following: 273 (a) Retail stores. 274 (b) Business, professional or governmental offices. 275 (c) Restaurants. 276 (d) Personal service establishments. 277 (e) Service establishments. 278 (f) Hotels and motels. 279 (g) Places of public assembly. 280 (h) Bus terminal. 281 (i) Wholesale, storage, warehousing, and distribution establishments. 282 (j) Indoor or outdoor recreation and amusement establishments. 283 (k) Hospitals and medical centers. 284 (l) Drive-throughs. 285 (m) Motor vehicle, boat, or farm equipment sales or service: 286 (1) The minimum lot size for such establishments shall be 20,000 square feet, 287 and the minimum street frontage shall be 150 feet. 288 (2) Entrance and exit driveways shall have an unrestricted width of not less than 289 16 feet, shall be located not nearer than ten feet from any property line and 290 shall be so laid out as to avoid the necessity of any vehicle leaving the 291 property to back out across any public right-of-way or portion thereof. 292 (3) Vehicle lifts or pits, dismantled and disabled automobiles, and all parts or 293 supplies shall be located within a building enclosed on all sides. 294 (4) All service or repair of motor vehicles, other than such minor servicing as 295 change of tires or sale of gasoline or oil, shall be conducted in a building 296 fully enclosed on all sides. This requirement shall not be construed to mean 297 that the doors to any repair shop must be kept closed at all times. 298 (5) The storage of gasoline or flammable oils in bulk shall be located fully 299 underground in accordance with applicable provisions of the National Fire 300 Protection Association Code. 301 (6) No fuel pumps shall be located nearer than 15 feet to any street line. 302 (7) Fuel pumps shall not be permitted closer than 100 feet from a property line 303 of any school, day care, church, hospital, nursing home, or place of public 304 assembly designed for the simultaneous use and occupancy by more than 100 305 persons. 306 (n) Manufacturing, assembling, converting, altering, finishing, cleaning, or any other 307 processing of products for sale on or off the premises, provided that not more than 308 25 persons shall be engaged in such activity; and provided further, that any such 309 use shall be subject to the performance standards procedure as set forth in article 5, 310 section 8.

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 9 311 (o) Mini-storage facilities, subject to the following regulations: 312 (1) No unit shall be placed within 30 feet of a residential property line. 313 (2) No outside storage, except for recreational vehicles, boats, or personal 314 automobiles when completely parked in specifically approved locations. 315 Parking for these vehicles shall not count toward the required parking set 316 forth in subsection (e) below. 317 (3) No individual unit may be used for retail, garage sale, or any other 318 commercial activities. 319 (4) No storage of flammable, explosive, corrosive, or other hazardous products 320 may occur in the individual unit. 321 (5) Parking must be provided at a ratio of one (1) space for each 25 rental units, 322 plus a minimum of three (3) spaces for an office 323 (p) Adult entertainment establishments, subject to the provisions stated in article 5, 324 section 13. 325 16.2 Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the 326 planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general 327 conditions set forth in article 10, section 1: 328 (a) Apartments and multi-family dwellings. 329 (b) Crematory, subject to the following requirements: 330 (1) The building lot line upon which a crematory is to be established shall be 331 located at least 100 feet from any residential zone. 332 (2) Where adjacent to residential zones, all landscape buffers shall be required. 333 The buffer shall consist of a landscape screen no less than six and one half 334 (6½) feet high. All landscaping shall be properly maintained throughout the 335 life of the use on lot. 336 (3) Loading operations shall be conducted within a completely enclosed 337 building. Location of loading doors shall be at the side or rear of the building. 338 (4) The crematory shall comply with the Delaware Incinerator Regulations. A 339 copy of the approved air pollution permit issued by the State of Delaware 340 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control shall 341 accompany the application for a certificate of occupancy. 342 16.3 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than off- 343 street parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for 344 outdoor eating areas associated with restaurants and outdoor sales areas approved by the 345 city planner. 346 16.4 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in 347 article 5, section 8.1. 348 16.5 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with 349 article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for 350 the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of 351 occupancy for any change of use.

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 10 352 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 353 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 26 – Commercial/Professional 354 Office Development District be amended by deleting it in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof 355 the following: 356 Section 26. Commercial and professional office zone (C-PO). 357 26.1 Uses permitted. In a commercial and professional office zone (C-PO), no building or 358 premises shall be used, and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is 359 arranged, intended, or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except 360 the following: 361 (a) Business, professional or governmental offices. 362 (b) Banks. 363 (c) Medical laboratories. 364 (d) Drive-in facilities accessory to any permitted use. 365 366 26.2 Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the 367 planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general 368 conditions set forth in article 10, section 1: 369 (a) Conditional uses accessory to permitted uses on the same lot: 370 (1) Cafeteria. 371 (2) Restaurant. 372 (3) Barbershop/beauty shop. 373 (4) Copy center. 374 (5) Office supply. 375 (6) Retail store. 376 (7) Newsstand. 377 (8) Spa and health club. 378 (9) Associated laboratories (other than those affiliated with permitted medical 379 uses). 380 (b) Residential uses as follows: 381 (1) Apartments and multifamily residences, provided at least two off-street 382 parking spaces shall be provided in the area for each unit. 383 (2) One (1) family residences subject to the requirements of the RG-1 (General 384 Residence) zone. 385 26.3 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than off- 386 street parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for 387 outdoor eating areas associated with restaurants and outdoor sales areas approved by the 388 city planner. 389 26.4 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in 390 article 5, section 8.1. 391 26.5 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with 392 article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for 393 the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of 394 occupancy for any change of use.

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 11 395 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 396 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 4 – Zoning Bulk and Parking Regulations, Sections 4.14 and 397 4.15 be amended by deleting the text shown in red bold strikethrough and inserting the text shown 398 in blue bold italics as follows: 399 Section 4.14. [C-1, C-1A, C-2, C-2A zones.] 400 Bulk and parking regulations for neighborhood commercial (C-1), limited commercial (C-1A), 401 central commercial (C-2), and limited commercial (C-2A) zones are as follows: C-1 C-1A C-2 C-2A 402 Minimum required: Lot area (sq. ft.) 2,500 Lot width (ft.) 35 100 25 0 50 Lot depth (ft.) 100 75 70 100 Front yard (ft.) 25 25 0 15 Side yard (ft.) None required, but 15 None Same as C-1 None Same as C-1 10 5 feet min. if required, but required, but 5 feet min. if None required, provided 5 feet min. if provided but 5 feet min. if provided provided Rear yard (ft.) 20 15 15 20 above ground floor. At Same as C-2 20 ground floor, 5 ft. required above ground floor. At ground floor, 5 ft. required. Side or rear yards which adjoin a 25 15 2515 25 15 25 residential zone (ft.) Off-street parking Per 300 sq. ft. floor area or 2 1½ ½ for new construction 1 Per employee (whichever is 0 1 0 1 greater) 403 Maximum permitted: Building height Stories 2 2 6 6 Feet 30 30 60 75 60 75 Floor area ratio 0.5 1.0 0.35 1.5 4.0 4.0 404 Section 4.15. [C-3, C-4, R-C, IO zones.] 405 Bulk and parking regulations for service commercial (C-3), highway commercial (C-4), recreation 406 and commercial (RC), and institutional and office (IO), and commercial and professional office 407 (C-PO) zones are as follows: C-3 C-4 RC IO C-PO 408 Minimum required: Lot area 5 acres 10,000 sq. 5,000 sq. ft. ft. Lot width (ft.) 100 150 per 250 50 100 50 building Lot depth (ft.) 100 150 400 100 100 Front yard (ft.) 25 20 30 20 30 20 10 10

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 12 Side yard (ft.) 20 15 25 15 50 10 5 Rear yard (ft.) 10 10 or equal 50 15 or equal 15 to bldg. to bldg. height height Side or rear yards which adjoin a residence 30 30 100 30 25 zone (ft.) Off-street parking Per 300 sq. ft. floor area or 1 1½ 1 1 1 Per employee (whichever is greater) 1 1 1 409 Maximum permitted: Building height Stories 26 46 10 10 3 Feet 30 75 45 75 130 130 150 45 Floor area ratio 0.5 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 2.0 Lot coverage 0.5 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lot coverage 85% 75% 410 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 411 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 10 – Planning Commission, Section 2 - Site Development Plan 412 Approval, be amended by deleting the text shown in red bold strikethrough and inserting the text 413 shown in blue bold italics as follows: 414 Section 2. - Site development plan approval. 415 2.1 Required. Site development plan approval shall be required for the erection or 416 enlargement of all structures and the establishment of any use for which site 417 development plan approval is required by this ordinance. Site development plan shall be 418 required according to the following criteria: 419 2.11 Planning commission site plan review. Site development plans shall be subject to 420 review and approval by the planning commission if they meet the following thresholds: 421 (a) New structures. Site plans for new structures and building additions of 35,000 422 square feet or greater in floor area; or 423 (b) Additions to existing structures. Site plans for additions to existing structures 424 that (1) constitute 15 percent or more of the existing floor area, and (2) new 425 floor area is greater than 5,000 square feet; or 426 (Bc) Impervious surface additions. Site plans with a total of 5,000 square feet or 427 greater of new or added impervious surface, including new structures or building 428 additions; or 429 (Cd) Adjacent to residential. Nonresidential site plans with site disturbance greater 430 than 12,500 square feet and adjacent to residential uses or residential zones. 431 2.12 Site development master plan. Site development master plans shall be subject to review 432 and approval by the planning commission in accordance with subsection 2.44. 433

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 13 434 2.13 Zoning review. For site development plans involving construction of a single-family 435 detached, single-family attached, or single-family semidetached dwelling; an accessory 436 structure; or a nonresidential change of use for which no building addition or increase 437 in impervious cover is proposed, the city planner or his designee may approve the site 438 development plan in conjunction with building permit review. 439 2.14 Administrative site plan. All site development plans that do not meet the thresholds for 440 zoning review in accordance with subsection 2.13 or planning commission site plan 441 review in accordance with subsection 2.11 shall be reviewed as administrative site 442 development plans. 443 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 444 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 12 – Definitions be amended by adding the following definitions 445 in the appropriate alphabetical order: 446 Apartment: A dwelling unit, within a building with other uses and/or dwelling units, that is 447 intended for use as a residence by an individual or a single family. 448 Dwelling, multi-family: (see “dwelling, multiple” - A building, or portion thereof, containing more 449 than two dwelling units) 450 Emergency shelter: A facility providing temporary housing to homeless or transient persons in 451 a dormitory style setting; such facility may also provide or facilitate other social services including 452 counseling and vocational training. 453 Personal Service Establishment: Establishments primarily engaged in providing individual 454 services generally related to personal needs, such as a hair salon. 455 Place of Public Assembly: Establishments where the principal use is for the gathering of persons 456 for activities such as civic, social, or religious functions, including but not limited to night clubs, 457 theaters, civic halls, and places of worship. 458 Retail: The selling of goods, wares, or merchandise directly to the ultimate consumer or persons 459 without a resale license. 460 Restaurant: An establishment in which the principal use is preparation and sale of food and 461 beverages. 462 Service Establishment: Any establishment whose primary activity is the provision of assistance, 463 as opposed to products, to individuals, business, industry, government, and other enterprises. 464 Transitional housing: A residential facility developed in a one-family dwelling unit that is 465 established to provide transition from homelessness to permanent housing, and generally integrated 466 with other social services and counseling programs to assist in the transition to self-sufficiency 467 through acquisition of stable income and permanent housing. 468 Vocational Training: A specialized instructional establishment that provides on-site training of 469 business, commercial, and/or trade skills. Incidental instructional services in conjunction with 470 another primary use shall not be considered vocational training. 471 ADOPTED: * 472 S:\ORDINANCES\2014\DRAFT\Ordinance #2014-08 Amending Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 10 - Institutional and Office - Final Reading.wpd 473 (SPONSORS: HARE, BONAR)

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-08 - AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING PAGE 14 474 Actions History 475 July 14, 2014 - Public Hearing/Final Reading Scheduled at Council 476 May 27, 2014 - First Reading at Council 477 May 12, 2014 - Considered by Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee 478 April 14, 2014 - Deferred by the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee

SPECIAL DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING A Special Dover Human Relations Commission (DHRC) meeting was held on May 13, 2014 at 5:35 p.m. with Chairman Wilson presiding. Members present were Mr. McGiffin (arrived at 5:48 p.m.), Mrs. Sadusky, Ms. Smith, Ms. Stewart (arrived at 6:14), Mr. Roach, and Mr. Ruane. Ms. Hicks and Mr. Henderson were absent. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Roach moved for approval of the agenda as presented, seconded by Mrs. Sadusky and unanimously carried. Presentation - DHRC and City of Dover Police Department Interaction (Police Chief Bernat) City of Dover Police Chief Paul Bernat advised members that the Dover Police Department was involved in many facets of the Dover community. He stated that the Department was active in 49 homeowner associations/neighborhood watch groups and could provide neighborhood crime statistics and crime prevention tips to these groups. He noted that the Department had become increasingly involved in social media by issuing news releases, participating in Facebook and Twitter, and maintaining its own website (www.doverpolice.org), and was in the process of implementing a new phone application that would push out news feeds and allow the Department to receive anonymous tips through text messaging. Chief Bernat explained that the Police Department offers personal and workplace safety talks, as well as bicycle safety programs for five (5) to 12-year-olds. Officers visit day care centers, preschools, and elementary schools, interacting with children through their “Meet a Police Officer” Program, and also attend block parties. They provide drug awareness and education through the Gang Resistance Education and Training (GREAT) program for fifth graders at William Henry Middle School. He stated that the Police Department has a very successful Crime-Free Multi-Housing Program (CHMHP), which brings together property managers, residents, and police officers with the goal of promoting crime-free housing, and this program had resulted in a 90% decrease in calls for service in one (1) City neighborhood when first implemented. Chief Bernat explained that the Police Department’s Sex Offender Management Unit was very active, managing more than 200 sex offenders within the City and conducting quarterly, semi-annual, and annual checks of offenders at various tier levels. In coordination with the Modern Maturity Center, the Department also participates in an “Are You Okay” program to check on homebound residents who do not respond to pre-programmed phone calls. Chief Bernat explained that the functions he had described were predominantly performed by the Department’s Community Policing Unit; however, as the recently appointed Chief of Police, it was his goal to expand this focus and to make the entire Dover Police Department a Community Police Department. He noted the importance of building rapport within the community through the development of trust and understanding, and by proving the Department’s ability to help. He expressed his opinion that if the Police Department adopted the philosophy of community policing, which promotes community, government, and police partnerships; proactive problem solving; and community engagement to address crime and community issues, the City of Dover would be a better place. Chief Bernat stated that a good community policing officer is a good manager, relates well with the public, and is a good problem solver. He stated that every police officer should have these characteristics and that he intended for all Dover officers to be trained in this regard. Noting the diversity of the City’s population, he stated that the Police Department could benefit from diversity training.

SPECIAL DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 13, 2014 PAGE 2 Chief Bernat informed members that he was promoted to the position of Chief of Police on April 4, 2014, and that during the month of April 2014, police detectives handled a total of 191 cases and cleared 185, resulting in a clearance rate of 96.9%. Seven (7) burglaries were investigated and four (4) were cleared, which represented a 57% clearance rate. Five (5) robberies were investigated and all were cleared. He emphasized that the City’s police force was extremely busy and working hard to make Dover a safer place to live and visit. He noted that a police force of 93 officers was currently authorized and 92 were serving. He stated that a Police Academy was scheduled for September 2014 and it was hoped that the open position would be filled at that time. Responding to Ms. Smith regarding the current perceptions of the community regarding the Dover Police Department, Chief Bernat advised members that within the past six (6) months there had been allegations of police brutality from the community. He indicated that while serving as Deputy Chief, all use of force reports came across his desk, and if he felt there were “issues,” he would launch a formal investigation or seek video of the incident. Chief Bernat explained that checks and balances are in place and when an officer uses force, a use of force report is required. The report is checked by a sergeant, reviewed by a lieutenant and captain, and finally approved by a major. In regard to the particular allegations of brutality that were brought forward, he indicated that video related to one (1) incident revealed that the allegation was not supported; however, in another case, something did occur and action was taken. In response to Ms. Smith’s inquiry with respect to the Chief’s vision regarding how the gap between the police and the community could be bridged, Chief Bernat stated his intention to be accessible and hear from the citizens, noting that having community support would empower the Police Department and vice versa. He indicated that he had met with many community members who had expressed their support. Noting that Deputy Chief Marvin Mailey was currently attending a meeting in downtown Dover, Chief Bernat stated that it was his intention to meet with business people in that area. He planned to stress to police offers that they should introduce themselves to others when walking through communities and let people know how to contact them. It was his hope that officers would act in a manner similar to the Chief of Police during their 12-hour tours, becoming familiar with their assigned areas and using crime mapping and the Regional Analysis and Information Sharing (RAIDS) Online tool. He stated that having an analyst in the Department would be helpful; however, this was not in the Department’s budget. He advised members that he would be devoting the next three (3) years to accomplishing his goals. Mr. Roach stated that he had spoken with some individuals who felt that there was a disconnect between patrol officers and the community. He stressed the importance of not regarding those who reach out to shake a police officer’s hand as criminals, noting that officers would need the community’s support in order to protect and serve them. He stated his appreciation of the previous Drug Awareness and Resistance Education (DARE) program, which allowed officers to be known by children in the community. He inquired what Chief Bernat would do to change the negative connotations that many young children have of police officers. Responding, Chief Bernat stated that he had recently spoken to members of the public who expressed appreciation for the former Police Athletic League (PAL) football program; however, federal funding for this program had “dried up.” He indicated that he had recently received information that $72,000

SPECIAL DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 13, 2014 PAGE 3 in federal competitive grant opportunity funding was available through Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN). He spoke with Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, regarding this grant and his lieutenant called Delaware State University to see if their facilities could be used in this regard. It was their hope that, by partnering together, activities such as flag football, basketball, etc., could be offered. Chief Bernat noted that other ideas had also been discussed, such as taking underprivileged kids to baseball/basketball games to build trust. Noting that hate crimes are one (1) of the concerns that are sometimes addressed by human relations commissions, Mr. Ruane inquired if hate crimes presented a challenge in Dover. Responding, Chief Bernat stated that hate crimes were not on the forefront of problems in the community and that the only related issue that he recalled was a “nasty flyer” that had been distributed approximately two (2) years prior, and the Police Department was unable to find who had issued it. He was unable to recall a “true, horrible” hate crime. Mr. Ruane requested that the members of the DHRC be provided the list of 49 homeowners associations that Chief Bernat had referenced previously and suggested that this list be compared with information maintained by the City Clerk’s Office regarding homeowners associations. Responding, Chief Bernat stated that the Community Policing Unit prepares a quarterly report which includes a list of all associations, community concerns and what has been done to combat the problems, and he would be happy to share this information with members. In response to Mr. Ruane regarding the effectiveness of neighborhood watch programs, Chief Bernat stated that these groups empower neighbors by explaining what to look for, helping to set up phone trees and email chains, and holding regular meetings. He mentioned that the Police Department’s social media staff member was very active with these associations and helps them to establish their own blogs for communication. Mr. Roach stated that several people had indicated to him that there was an alleged hanging/suicide at Silver Lake one (1) or two (2) years ago and the City had not communicated with them regarding the resolution or outcome of this matter. Responding, Chief Bernat stated that former Police Chief James Hosfelt was very involved with this matter and that he had met with community leaders regarding the incident, who were completely satisfied with the outcome. Mr. Wilson expressed appreciation to Chief Bernat for the information provided. Scheduling of DHRC Workshop Mr. Ruane advised members that Mr. Wilson had requested him to facilitate a strategic planning workshop for commissioners to establish specific objectives and ways of implementing goals, determine time frames, and develop ways to measure results. The purpose of the workshop would be to ensure that all members are “on the same page” by developing a mission statement and a vision of where the commissioners see the DHRC going. Mr. Ruane indicated that he hoped to send a related outline for members to review.

SPECIAL DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 13, 2014 PAGE 4 By unanimous consent, members scheduled the workshop for Tuesday, July 8, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Discussion - City Council and DHRC District Orientation Meetings Mr. Wilson encouraged members to meet with their corresponding City Council district representatives to share information and possibly alleviate problems. He requested members to obtain contact information for their respective City Council representatives from the City Clerk’s Office, schedule meetings, and email him to let him know that such meetings had taken place. Discussion - Member ID Cards Mr. Wilson advised members that it was very important that they obtain and present their DHRC identification when working in the community. He suggested that members be provided a few business cards and asked the City Clerk’s Office for assistance in this regard. Update by Chairman Wilson - City Manager Department Head Meeting of April 29, 2014 Mr. Wilson stated that he attended the City Manager Department Head meeting on April 29, 2014, since he felt that it was important that the DHRC establish a relationship with City departments and get to know the people who run the City and what they do. He advised department heads that the DHRC was seeking their input to be included in their strategic plan and requested them to inform the DHRC how they could help to alleviate staff’s concerns. Mr. Wilson stated that the Public Works Department had indicated that the DHRC could do a lot of work for them. Mr. Wilson reminded members that everything that the DHRC does should be positive. Responding to Ms. Smith regarding input received from department heads, Mr. Wilson explained that the purpose of his attending the meeting was to introduce himself and the DHRC to staff and request their input. He indicated that he was now awaiting their responses. Discussion of Future Quarterly Meeting Dates Mr. Wilson reminded members that future meetings had been scheduled for July 22, 2014; October 28, 2014; and January 27, 2015. He expressed his hope that the DHRC Strategic Plan would be in place by July 22, 2014. Commission Members’ Announcements Mr. Roach suggested that it would be helpful to obtain information regarding some of the complaints previously received by the DHRC, noting that this would be helpful in developing goals for the future. Responding, Mr. Wilson stated that previous meeting minutes would reveal these actions and were available on the City’s website. Mr. Ruane stated his recollection that the DHRC had previously completed a survey with the assistance of a former member associated with Delaware State University. Responding, Mrs. McDowell stated that she was not aware of such a survey but that the City Clerk’s Office could research this further. (City Clerk’s Office Note: DHRC meeting minutes reveal that the DHRC conducted a survey between 2003 and 2004, the results of which were briefly discussed during the DHRC meeting of September 22, 2004; however, official results of the survey were not provided to the City Clerk’s Office.)

SPECIAL DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 13, 2014 PAGE 5 In response to Mr. Ruane regarding the relationship between the State Human Relations Commission (SHRC) and the DHRC, and whether the SHRC would provide members with information on matters in Dover that the State might be involved in, Mr. Wilson stated he had attended a SHRC meeting during the previous week, was in communication with the Chair and Director of the SHRC, and had another meeting scheduled to meet with them. They were pleased and excited about the newly organized DHRC and would be working with the Dover Commission. Mr. Wilson stated that he hoped that there would be a good connection between the SHRC and the DHRC and that they would consult regarding the development of a complaint form. He indicated that he would like to see the SHRC participate in the upcoming workshop in case there were questions at the State level. It was his understanding that the DHRC was the only municipal human relations commission in the State of Delaware. Mr. McGiffin moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. McGiffin and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m. Cecil C. Wilson Chairman CCW/TM/js/dd S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Misc-Minutes\HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION\2014\05-13-2014 Dover Human Relations Commission.wpd

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE The Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Meeting was held on June 23, 2014 at 4:00 p.m. with Chairman Hutchison presiding. Members present were Mr. Dixon, Mr. Perza (arrived at 4:12 p.m. and departed at 4:22 p.m.), and Mr. Keller. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Dixon moved for approval of the agenda as presented, seconded by Mr. Keller and unanimously carried. Concerns Related to Permit Parking in Front of Wesley Pre-School and Education Building During the Committee meeting of May 12, 2014, members considered concerns of the tenants of the Wesley Church Education Building and the Wesley Pre-School regarding the allocation of permit parking in the “A-Street Lot”, which was previously free two (2) hour parking. After much discussion, the Committee remanded the matter back to staff to meet with Wesley Church to consider the needs and assessments that need to be factored in regarding the Church, its school, and its mission and that staff be authorized to proceed with intermediate permit spot adjustments. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, reviewed a map of the Public Parking Plan - A-Street Lot (Attachment #1), explaining that the lot consists of 20 parking spaces: 13 designated for permit parking, six (6) for two (2) hour free parking, and one (1) for handicapped parking; and four (4) additional two (2) hour free parallel spots on the Loockerman Street side of the median. She reminded members that the original plan was to designate 13 parallel parking spaces on Loockerman Street between State and Federal Streets as permit parking, noting that there were on-street parking spaces further west on Loockerman Street adjacent to the building owned by Barros, McNamara, Malkiewicz, and Taylor, P.A. and that five (5) to eight (8) of the permit spaces could be shifted to that area. However, she stated that Barros, McNamara, Malkiewicz, and Taylor were not in favor of such a plan, explaining that their parking permit area had changed several times during the past few years. Originally, it was located in the parking lot where the new Dover Public Library is now situated, then moved to the North Street Parking Lot, then to Bradford Street, and then to their current location in front of the Wesley Education Building. It was her sense that the law firm was also concerned that no one had included them in the discussions of parking changes. Mrs. Townshend stated that she had met with Mr. Dave Casto, Chair of Trustees, Wesley United Methodist Church (UMC), and discussed the possibility of adding three (3) more permit parking spaces to be located on Loockerman Street, on the southeast corner of State and Loockerman Streets, and to allow Wesley UMC to have three (3) additional permits, which would result in a total of 16 permit parking spaces, all to be considered A-Street Lot permits. She stated that she had attempted to contact Mr. Malkiewicz’s office regarding this possibility but was unsuccessful; however, she assured members that she would be meeting with them later in the week. Mrs. Townshend explained that the allocation of these parking areas would be “a temporary fix” through the end of the calendar year and recommended that the City request that the Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) find additional parking spaces to add to the inventory by expanding or

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 2 leasing parking lots. She stated that the City could then absorb the permit parking spaces back into the main inventory and allow the A-Street Lot to become public, on-street parking, as it had been in the past. Responding to Mr. Hutchison, Mrs. Townshend stated that Barros, McNamara, Malkiewicez, and Taylor, P.A. had 13 parking permits and, after talking with Mr. Casto, she felt that the three (3) parking permits would be sufficient for the Church. Mr. Mike Malkiewicz, Barros, McNamara, Malkiewicz, and Taylor, P.A., 2 W. Loockerman Street, indicated that his paralegal had always handled parking permits for the law firm and he was aware that the City had contacted the firm last week; however, he had not discussed that conversation with his paralegal. He stated that several changes had been made to their permit parking over the last few years and it was their understanding that the last designation was to be permanent, which was relayed to the employees of the firm. Mr. Malkiewicz advised members that there were safety issues involved, explaining that several employees work late in the evening, after dark, and that the street lights were not in operation for a period of time. He requested that the City make no changes to the current parking permits provided for his law firm, noting that the current location was convenient and provided safety, and asked that Wesley Church’s needs also be accommodated. Mr. Malkiewicz noted that he had observed that there were several available parking spots on the southeast corner of State and Loockerman Streets that are vacant during the day. Mr. Casto reminded members that several programs operate out of Wesley Church’s Education Building, including the Capital School District’s Student Transition to Adult Readiness (STAR) program, The Arc of Delaware program, a clothing closet, Wesley Preschool, etc. He stated that three (3) permit parking spaces would help temporarily until the matter could be resolved, particularly since there will be another program from the Church’s District Office moving into the Education Building. He noted that the church had lost 13 spots that they previously had access to. In response to Mr. Hutchison regarding the possibility of resolving the problem at this time rather than having to make another change in January, Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, explained the need to react to changing parking conditions downtown. He did not feel confident that the City could provide a solution at this time that would guarantee that changes would not have to be made on January 1st, unless all involved were pleased with the temporary solution, in which case City Council could request that no further changes be made. Mr. Koenig stated that any additional parking lots or leased parking was likely to be developed west of State Street, since that is where private lots are located that might be available. He explained that staff’s proposal was always meant to be temporary and that staff had been working on a reasonable solution; however, he did not feel that all businesses would be able to park exactly where they hoped. Mr. Koenig stated that the building of a central garage was being considered by the DDP. He indicated that staff would continue to move forward with the anticipation that the parking proposal would be a temporary solution, unless, once school begins in September, the businesses affected were to approach the City and indicate that their parking situation and concerns had been resolved.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 3 Mrs. Townshend reminded members that the problem originated in December 2013 when permit sales began for 2014 and it was determined that there were not enough spaces available to renew all the permits. Staff had to act relatively quickly to accommodate long-term permit holders and did not have time to consider leasing other areas. Mr. Dixon moved to recommend that staff be authorized to add three (3) additional permit parking spaces on East Loockerman Street and to provide three (3) parking permits to Wesley Church, with parking in this area to be re-evaluated in October and, in the meantime, to work with the DDP to expand the parking inventory. The motion was seconded by Mr. Keller and carried by a vote of three (3) yes (Hutchison, Dixon, and Keller) and one (1) no (Perza). Request for Waiver of Public Street Frontage Requirement - Appendix A - Subdivisions, Article VI - Subdivision - General Requirements and Design Standards, Section E - Lots (Dover Mall) During the Committee meeting of May 27, 2014, members considered a request of Simon Property Group, owner of the Dover Mall, L.P. at 1365 North DuPont Highway, for a waiver of the public street frontage requirement. The owner proposed to create three (3) parcels of land from the existing 149.3225+/- acre parcel of the Dover Mall. The property is zoned SC-3 (Regional Shopping Center Zone), and a portion is subject to the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) Tier 3 – Excellent Recharge Area and is located on the east side of North DuPont Highway and south of but not adjacent to Rustic Lane. Members were advised that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested waiver, subject to inclusion of the necessary easements listed in the Development Advisory Committee Report. The Committee noted that the applicant was not present, and deferred action on the request until the applicant could be present to answer questions. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, stated that, as proposed, Lots 1 and 2 would not have frontage on a public street; therefore, in order to create lots, without frontage on a public street, which is required by the Zoning Ordinance, a waiver by City Council would be required in accordance with Appendix A - Subdivisions, Article VI - Subdivision - General Requirements and Design Standards, Section E - Lots. Responding to Mr. Hutchison, Mrs. Townshend stated that Lot 1 would consist of 53.1704 acres and Lot 2 would consist of 30.7046 acres, and that both lots were owned by the Dover Mall. Mr. John Paradee, Prickett, Jones, & Elliott, emphasized for the record that the owners were not proposing any residential use as part of this project. Mr. Gregg Moore, Becker Morgan Group, explained that the plan was to create the two (2) lots to allow consideration of development options. The current proposal was to develop approximately 289,000 sq. ft. of retail expansion in the areas to the rear of the Dover Mall property. He assured members that these subdivisions would be for commercial entities, which would be allowable by the zoning code. Mr. Moore stated that two (2) other lots in the area were previously created through the same type of action by former members of City Council, and explained that these lots were

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 4 currently occupied by Boscov’s and JCPenney and do not have road frontage. It was his feeling that those requests were approved because the loop road around the Dover Mall is effectively a public access way for the Mall and is protected by easements of the owners that allow that roadway to be maintained as a public access way. Mr. Moore stated that the two (2) new lots would gain a portion of their access from the loop road and approval of the request would not set a precedent, since the precedent had already been set by allowing the Boscov’s and JCPenney stores. Responding to Mr. Keller, Mr. Moore stated that the City would not incur costs for providing public utilities, explaining that sewer options had been discussed with the City and installation of sewers would be developer driven. He advised members that the actual details of the sewer would be shown on any development plan submitted; however, at the City’s urging, the studies had been conducted to ensure that there would be no issues with providing sewer to the parcels. Mr. Moore reiterated that all costs involved with the project would be assumed by the developer. Mr. Keller moved to recommend approval of the requested waiver, subject to inclusion of the necessary easements listed in the DAC Report, as recommended by the Planning Commission. The motion was seconded by Mr. Dixon and unanimously carried. Update - Dover High School Construction Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that she had written a letter to the Capital School District (CSD), to make sure that construction of the new Dover High School was proceeding quickly and that there was a clear plan to complete all work by the time school starts. Since that letter was sent, she stated that several meetings had been held, including a meeting between the CSD and the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) regarding the east entrance, west entrance, sidewalks, and High-Intensity Activated CrossWalK (HAWK) signal. Mrs. Townshend stated that the day following that meeting, there was a meeting with CSD and EDiS staff. She also attended an on-site meeting to coordinate the activities of the sidewalk project and the east entrance with the contractors, which was very productive. DelDOT had indicated that each of these projects was equally important and needed to be completed before school starts; therefore, all parties involved need to work together. Mrs. Townshend stated that the Dover High monthly coordination meeting was held and that the CSD was working with the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) on a “punch list” in regard to sediment and stormwater. Mrs. Townshend indicated that the building was in good shape and the site was coming together and, although there was a lot more work to be done, she had been provided with construction schedules and was being included in updates. In addition, she stated that she and Dr. Michael Thomas, CSD Superintendent, were having a weekly phone conversation so that if any issues arise, they can be resolved immediately. It was her belief that construction would be completed before school is scheduled to open, although she indicated that “it will be close.” Mr. Keller commended Mrs. Townshend for the thorough job she had done regarding this project.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 5 Mr. Keller moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Dixon and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 4:33 p.m. James L. Hutchison, Sr. Chairman JLH/JS/jg/dd/tm S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Committee-Minutes\2014\06-23-2014 SA&T.wpd Attachment Attachment #1 - Map - A-Street Lot Public Parking Plan

ATTACHMENT #1 SA&T Committee Meeting of 06-23-2014 FEDERAL STREET LOOCKERMAN STREET DOVER PUBLIC LIBRARY PERMIT 3 NORTH STREET 13 ATTACHMENT #1 3 A STREET LOT: TOTAL PARKING SPACES: 20 PERMITS PARKING: 13 SPACES 2 HOUR PARKING: 6 SPACES ADA PARKING: 1 SPACE SA&T Committee Meeting of 06-23-2014 PARKING PERMITS CAN BE PURCHASED AT THE CITY PUBLIC PARKING PLAN - A STREET LOT OF DOVER, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND INSPECTIONS LOCATED IN CITY HALL AT 15 LOOCKERMAN WAY. *A LIMITED NUMBER OF PERMITS ARE AVAILABLE AND THE CITY OF DOVER FEBRUARY 2014 CAN NOT GUARANTEE THE AVAILABILITY OF PARKING PERMITS FOR ANY CITY LOTS.

UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee Meeting was held on June 23, 2014 at 5:02 p.m. with Councilman Perza presiding in the absence of Chairwoman Williams (arrived at 5:06 p.m.). Members present were Mr. Slavin, Mr. Blakeman, and Mr. Snaman. Members of Council present were Mr. Dixon and Mr. Hutchison. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS By unanimous consent, the agenda was approved as presented. Proposed Ordinance #2014-15 Amending Chapter 110 - Utilities, Article III - Water Service, Division 3 - Water Impact Fees, Section 110-207 - Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units and Article IV - Sanitary Sewer Service, Division 3 - Wastewater Collection Impact Fees, Section 110-282 - Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2014-15, which would amend Chapter 110 - Utilities, Article III - Water Service, Division 3 - Water Impact Fees, Section 110-207 - Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units and Article IV - Sanitary Sewer Service, Division 3 - Wastewater Collection Impact Fees, Section 110-282 - Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units. He advised members that Chapter 110 - Utilities, Articles III and IV currently have a maximum cap of 100 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) per certificate of occupancy. Mr. Koenig stated that the maximum cap was intended to encourage business expansion; however, the existing prescriptive cap had placed the City at a negotiating disadvantage in recent situations, such as the Garrison Energy Center (Calpine). Mr. Koenig explained that the proposed amendment would remove the current impact fee cap of 100 EDUs per certificate of occupancy. Additionally the proposed amendment would provide City Council with the ability to reduce the maximum number of EDUs for large development projects; however, the applicant must demonstrate their economic benefit to the City before City Council will reduce the maximum number of EDUs to as low as 100 EDUs. Mr. Koenig indicated that the amendment would provide the City leverage in negotiating with businesses. As an example, he stated that the water system for the Garrison Energy Center (Calpine) included an elevated storage tank, at a cost of $4.2M, and additional infrastructure improvements. With the current impact fees, Calpine will contribute approximately $210,000 for this project; however, if the caps had been negotiated, he stated that the City may have been able to recover the total $4.2M. Mr. Koenig stated that, to his recollection, the maximum caps were instituted when the City was considering the expansion of Proctor & Gamble, which would have resulted in a multi-million dollar impact fee. He stated that at that time no system improvements, such as a water tower, pump station, etc., were required of the City; the expansion would have resulted only in an impact on the system. Responding to Mr. Perza, Mr. Koenig indicated his anticipation that the proposed amendment would result in additional revenues for the City since it would provide the City more leverage to collect a higher fee than currently prescribed by Code. Mr. Koenig stated that the proposed amendment would not affect the current block under construction for the Calpine project since permits had

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 2 already been issued. He advised members that, under the current Code, if a second block were constructed by Calpine, EDUs would be capped at 100 and if there were any costs for the system upgrade, the City would bear those costs. In response to Mr. Blakeman, Mr. Koenig stated that the caps were initially instituted for economic development reasons. Staff recommended adoption of the proposed ordinance. Mr. Blakeman moved to recommend adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2014-15, as recommended by staff, seconded by Mr. Slavin and unanimously carried. Mr. Blakeman moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Slavin and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m. Adam M. Perza Acting Chair AMP/TM/jg/js/dd S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Committee-Minutes\2014\06-23-2014 UTILITY.wpd

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting was held on June 23, 2014, at 6:00 p.m. with Chairman Slavin presiding. Members present were Mr. Anderson (arrived at 6:04 p.m.), Mr. Hare (arrived at 6:05 p.m.), Mr. Shevock, and Mr. Sudler. Members of Council present were Mr. Dixon, Mr. Hutchison, and Mrs. Williams. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Shevock moved for approval of the agenda as presented, seconded by Mr. Sudler and unanimously carried. Presentation - Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) (Ken Abraham) Mr. Ken Abraham, 430 Kings Highway, Apt. 414, addressed members regarding drug policies and laws. He advised members that he is a member of the Speakers Bureau for Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) and that he enjoyed working as a prosecutor for approximately 10 years in Dover, then moved to Florida, went into business, and returned to Dover. He stated that approximately seven (7) years ago he lost everything to drugs, despite having had the best parents and a wonderful childhood. Since he could not change the past, he stated that he was trying to turn the negative in his life into a positive, noting that it was a learning experience. He stated that, in addition to starting a non-profit organization eight (8) months ago, he gives presentations to rotary clubs, youth groups, etc., as well as individuals such legislators and ministers. Mr. Abraham indicated his understanding that City Council does not set or control drug policy; however, he wanted members to be made aware of the issues and suggested that the City adopt a resolution encouraging State legislators to change the drug laws to some extent. As an example, he suggested that legislators could be encouraged to adopt medical marijuana and to legalize marijuana. Mr. Abraham encouraged members to read the “After Prohibition” brochure issued by LEAP, explaining that it addresses many issues, problems, concerns, and questions. He stated that the material indicated quite emphatically that both addiction and crime decrease when drugs are legalized or decriminalized, contrary to the belief held by most that addiction and crime will increase if these changes are made. Referring to Colorado’s experiment with marijuana, which he stated had proven to be a great success, he indicated that, although there are problems with the legalization/decriminalization of drugs, the benefits far outweigh the problems. He stated that Colorado was making a substantial amount of tax revenue and crime and addiction rates had decreased. Mr. Abraham advised members that the illicit drug market was approximately a $300 billion per year business and questioned if this business, with the whirlpool of crime that swirls around it, should be run by drug kingpins, thugs, and hoodlums or if the State should legalize, regulate, and tax drugs. He reminded members that the country started prohibition with alcohol and it did not take long to realize that this was a mistake. It was Mr. Abraham’s belief that alcohol did not create Al Capone; prohibition created Al Capone, just as the prohibition of drugs in America creates a whirlpool of crime. He stated that, according to studies, 84%-90% of all crime is drug related and over 90% of property crimes are drug related (theft for the purpose of purchasing drugs). Mr. Abraham expressed his belief that changing the laws to legalize and regulate drugs would decrease those percentages substantially.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 2 Mr. Abraham explained that regulation simply means responsible people making responsible decisions and that in Colorado children were not standing in line to buy drugs. He stated that LEAP’s position was that all drugs should be decriminalized, legalized, regulated, and taxed; that there is a difference between hard and soft drugs; and a different approach should be taken for each. Mr. Abraham stated that the bottom line is that drug addiction is a health problem and that more and more individuals are realizing that addicts should be treated rather than locked up in prisons. As a former prosecutor, Mr. Abraham stated that he had seen crime victims every day and explained that when addicts are treated, future crime victims are prevented, the recidivism rate is reduced, and the revolving door to prison is slowed down. As mentioned in the material provided, he stressed the importance of advertising, explaining that any legalization and regulation of drugs needed to be accompanied by advertising of the dangers of drugs. Referring to the situation in Colorado, he stated that it was expected that the State would gain $150M in tax revenue and $40M was planned to be spent on rehabilitation centers, treatment, and an advertisement campaign warning about the dangers of drugs. He noted that the use of cigarettes by teens between the ages of 12 to 17 was cut in half from 2002 through 2012 due to advertising of the dangers of cigarettes. Noting that most of what had been addressed was beyond the scope of City Council, Mr. Anderson questioned what could be done to encourage rehabilitation on a local level and if any barriers were known. Responding, Mr. Abraham stated that he was not aware of any barriers, such as zoning issues. He felt that there was a need to increase public awareness of the need for treatment and rally those that have the funds and means to provide effective treatment. In response to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Abraham stated that he was not aware of any statistical analysis or comparison relating to the implementation of such a program in an area similar in size to Dover, Delaware. However, he stated that the general principles and results are the same wherever there had been a change in policy implemented and did not feel that the size of the area would make a difference. Regarding the difference in the results based on “hard” and “soft” drugs, Mr. Abraham stated that in those jurisdictions that have legalized all drugs, including “hard” drugs, the results have been the same - a decrease in addiction rates, a reduction in health problems, and a decreased crime rate. He advised members that an agency known as DrugFree.org, in New York, recently took over the Montana Meth Project, which dramatically reduced methamphetamine use, drug lab busts, trips to the emergency room, etc. in about eight (8) states. Advertisements for the Montana Meth Project include real people who tell their stories of the effects of drugs on them. Mr. Abraham advised members that DrugFree.org will develop an advertising campaign for any jurisdiction. He explained that there are two (2) groups of people: those who do not use drugs and those that do, and that the advertising works differently for those groups. For those who do not use drugs, the advertising dramatically reduces the number of people who are inclined to use drugs. Advertising treatment dramatically reduces the number of people already using drugs, once the policies are changed in criminal law. Mr. Abraham stated that the information provides facts regarding the effects that drugs have on human brains, explaining that these sinister drugs release

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 3 a chemical in the brain that gives pleasure and is released to such an extent that, as described by a psycho-forensic evaluator with the public defender’s office, the brain is “hijacked” by overwhelming one’s sense of judgement, moral values, awareness of right and wrong, etc. It just makes the user want more of the drugs. The Committee took no action regarding this matter. Expiration of Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) Loan Guarantee Extension During their Regular Meeting of June 10, 2013, members of City Council approved an extension of the Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) loan guarantee for a period of one (1) year effective July 1, 2013 on the loan between PNC Bank and the DDP. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed information prepared by Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, regarding the DDP’s negotiation of new terms for the PNC Loan collateralized by real estate on Governors Avenue (former “Acme” Property). He reminded members that City Council had provided the City’s guarantee on the loan since March 2008 and that the guarantee was extended for one year, effective July 1, 2013. He stated that the approximate dollar amount of the loan was $1.3M. Mr. Koenig stated that in the renegotiations of this loan by Mr. Gerald Street, representative of the DDP, it was hoped that, at some point, the City could be released from the loan; however, due to the current economic conditions, PNC requested the continuation of the City’s guarantee through the term of the loan. He indicated that the reason for this request was due to: 1) the loan to value (LTV) of greater than 80%; and 2) the marketability of the “Acme” property, value, strength of tenants, and lease stream. The bank had agreed to extend the “Acme” loan to March 1, 2017 and begin amortizing the loan based on a 20-year amortization. Mr. Koenig stated that the loan included a 3.75% interest rate. PNC will require a principal and interest payment, and at the end of the initial term, PNC would renegotiate the interest rate over the balance of the loan term. Staff recommended approval of the extension of the Downtown Dover Partnership loan guarantee with PNC Bank through March 1, 2017. Responding to Mr. Hare, Mr. Koenig stated that the initial amount of the loan in 2008 was $1.3M and that payments had been made only on interest since that time. He stated that for the next three (3) years, principal and interest payments would be made based on a 3.75% interest rate. In response to Mr. Shevock, Mr. Koenig stated that the DDP would make the payment to PNC from monies collected by the DDP from the leasing tenants. He stated that the guarantee appears on the City’s balance sheet as a potential debt; however, this debt would be incurred only if the note were called and the DDP exhausted their funds. He stated that it would continue to be reflected as a commitment of the City as it had been since 2008.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 4 Noting that only interest was paid on the loan, Mrs. Williams questioned the use of monies collected from the tenants. Responding, Mr. Gregg Moore, President, DDP, stated that the tenants at the Acme site had been making their payments to the DDP and that those monies had been used by the DDP to make interest payments to PNC. Since an interest-only loan was negotiated, all additional proceeds were used for other downtown projects. He stated that the DDP had been actively marketing the site and that its sale would allow for the loan to be paid in full. However, he assured members that enough rent was coming from the two (2) tenants to cover the principal and interest payments. He stated that this payment had been included in the DDP budget which was provided to City Council. Responding to Mr. Sudler regarding the DDP’s top two (2) priority projects for which these additional funds were used, Mr. Moore indicated that, in accordance with the current terms of the loan, the DDP was not required to make any principal payment; therefore, only interest payments were made. Since the DDP was actively in the market to sell the property and had a full price sales contract (which did not go through), the DDP’s position was to use the least amount of money required and use any additional funds for other purposes in the downtown area, such as First Friday, Farmer’s Market, or marketing for other downtown functions. He stated that the monies were not provided to any given project and that there were not two (2) particular projects that accessed those funds. He explained that the proceeds were used by the DDP for their overall mission, which is to improve the culture and revitalize the downtown area; therefore, all six (6) of the DDP’s committees and missions draw from the additional monies. He noted that marketing the downtown is something that each of the committees includes in their budget; therefore, this would probably be the biggest use of those funds. Mr. Anderson moved to recommend extension of the Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) loan guarantee with PNC Bank through March 1, 2017, as recommended by staff, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. Proceeds from Sale of Real Estate Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed information prepared by Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, regarding proceeds from the sale of real estate. Mr. Koenig reminded members that City Council approved the sale of Garrison Oak Technical Park Lot 12 (10.684 acres) for $1,000 per acre, in accordance with the City’s economic development goals. He stated that the City’s net proceeds from the sale of Lot 12 were $10,623, explaining that the contract sales price was $10,864, less the seller settlement charges of $241. He stated that the City’s current Real Estate Disposition Policy does not specify to which account the net proceeds should be credited; therefore, staff recommended that the credit be applied to the Capital Asset Reserve and that a formal policy be developed for future transactions. Mr. Koenig noted that, in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), accounting for this transaction will require the recordation of a $44,140.65 loss on the sale of the fixed asset since the City was awarded a $2M grant from the State of Delaware for the purchase of

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 5 the Garrison Oak Technical Park and the City subsequently resold the property at a dollar value that was less than the per acre value of the original transaction. The City recorded the purchase of the land (381.8425 acres) at $1,933,277.16, or $5,063.02 per acre. In response to Mr. Shevock, Mr. Koenig stated that the grant was awarded 10 or more years ago; therefore, he did not anticipate that the State would request that the grant monies be refunded. Responding to Mr. Anderson regarding whether the City intended to sell or lease lots at the Technology Park, Mr. Koenig stated that there was currently a lease for the Garrison Energy Center tract and that the Solar Park also had a lease. He stated that negotiations for the sale or lease of the property would be dependent upon the needs of the organization that is interested in a tract. It was his opinion that it would be best for the City to sell the properties to avoid long-term liability or maintenance, should the property be abandoned. He stated that the current leases were made prior to his tenure as City Manager and that most discussions now involved the potential sale of properties. Mr. Hare questioned if anyone was actively marketing the Garrison Oak Technical Park. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that it is known locally that the property is for sale; however, no funds had been used for marketing the property, nor had advertisements been placed in the Wall Street Journal. He assured members that the State Economic Development Office was aware of properties for sale at the site, and stated his belief that funds included in the City’s Economic Development Office’s budget for advertisement were limited. Mr. Slavin suggested that the Economic Development Director and/or the Mayor could better advise members with regard to the marketing of the Garrison Oak Technical Park. Mr. Hutchison stated that the City had a very strong working relationship with the State of Delaware and Kent County Economic Development Offices, as well as the congressional leadership team. As a result, in terms of advertising, it was well known that the Garrison Park was for sale. He stated that if the City were to continue to be in the economic development business, members needed to realize that in order to be successful, there would be a need to make concessions, as that is what economic development does. He explained that if the City wanted jobs and opportunities, it would be necessary to make concessions and if that was not desired, the City should get out of the economic development business. Mr. Hare stated that, although the State may be marketing the property, he felt that the City should take a more aggressive approach in marketing not only the Garrison Oak property but the entire City of Dover. Mr. Hare moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation that the net proceeds from the sale of governmental fund real estate be credited to the Capital Asset Reserve for future capital projects. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2014 PAGE 6 Proposed Financial Reforms Mr. Slavin reminded members that during the June 11, 2014 Budget Hearings, he proposed a series of 14 financial reforms to be addressed over the next six (6) to nine (9) months that would assist in shaping the City’s Budget for FY 2015/2016. He stated that the proposed reforms were clustered into four (4) separate areas, as follows: 1) public safety; 2) compensation policies; 3) property tax governance; and 4) restrictions on uses of appropriations. He requested that members consider the public safety area first and that staff be requested to review the reforms, develop recommendations, and provide information on any financial gap that may result. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Slavin stated that the review would allow members to identify whether there was a need to create policy, ordinances, or Charter changes to implement any changes that may result from those discussions. By unanimous consent, the meeting adjourned at 6:32 p.m. Timothy A. Slavin Chairman TAS/TM/js/dd/jg S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Committee-Minutes\2014\06-23-2014 LF&A.wpd

Monthly Report May 2014 Office of City Assessor

Assessor’s Report Number of Deeds Stamped for Transfer Tax Dollar Amount for the Month of May 2013/2014 the Month of May 2013/2014 43 $100 $83 50 Thousands 40 $34 30 20 23 20 $50 $39 $12 20 9 9 $12 $0 $0 $6 10 0 5 0 2 2013 2013 $0 0 2014 2014 Transfer Tax Dollar Amount for May 2013/2014 Realty the Month of May 2013/2014 PropertySales in Dollars $100 $83 Received Prior to Recording Thousands $34 $6 $50 $39 $12 $6 $3 Millions $12 $0 $4 $2 $2 $0 $6 $2 2013 $2 $0 $0 $0 $0 2013 2014 $0 2014 Major Updates March ‐ 14 April ‐ 14 May ‐ 14 Assessment Change $2,672,600 ‐$28,000 $243,800 Residential Sales Ratio Report Sales in Study Total Assessed Total Sale Price Ratio PRD Value 17 $2,772,700 $2,544,322 1.09 1.03 1

Assessor’s Report Ratio – Assessed Value divided by Sale Price. PRD – Mean – A PRD above 1.03 tends to indicate assessment regressivity – high valued properties are under appraised relative to low valued properties. A PRD below .98 tends to indicate assessment progressivity – high valued properties are relatively over appraised. Points of Interest Scanning & Filing ‐ All new deeds are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. ‐ All appeal documents and correspondence are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. ‐All old property record cards are being scanned and indexed into Fortis. 2015 Revaluation ‐ The Assessor’s Office has started the 2015 Revaluation process by visiting various neighborhoods and collecting data, if necessary Assessor’s Office Appeals ‐ Appeal Hearings have been completed ( see attached spread sheet) 2

JUN 19, 2014 CITY OF DOVER PAGE: 1 09:35 AM SALES RATIO REPORT CA324 PARID NBHD LUC ADDRESS UNITS STYLE YRBLT STORIES SFLA GRADE CDU TOTAL APPR SALE DT PRICE ASR ED05-067.09-01-37.00 20B R10 165 MERION RD 1 3 1977 1 1866 C+ GD 191,700 22-MAY-14 159,000 ED05-067.15-01-15.00 17B R10 76 VILLAGE DR 1 13 1974 2 1484 C- GD 110,600 15-MAY-14 112,000 ED05-067.15-03-49.00 2A R10 35 VIRGINIA AVE 1 16 1991 1 1422 C AV 128,400 17-MAY-14 100,000 ED05-067.15-04-60.00 11 R10 895 SCHOOLHOUSE LN 1 5 1965 2 1972 C AV 157,600 09-MAY-14 211,000 ED05-067.18-03-05.00 17 R10 11 FREEDOM PL 1 3 1983 1 1935 B- AV 184,000 27-MAY-14 187,000 ED05-067.20-02-27.00 11A R10 324 COLUMBIA AVE 1 3 1939 1 1765 C+ AV 171,200 02-MAY-14 105,000 ED05-068.10-03-39.00 13 R10 827 CARVEL DR 1 14 1964 1 1120 C AV 151,000 09-MAY-14 129,000 ED05-068.15-05-17.00 25A R10 205 TEA PARTY TRL 13 2012 2 1580 B+ AV 185,200 06-MAY-14 154,900 ED05-068.17-01-65.00 8 R10 41 WASHINGTON ST 1 1 1928 2 1430 C+ GD 129,600 15-MAY-14 101,422 ED05-076.05-02-47.00 16D R10 5 BRIARWOOD CT 1 5 1987 2 2133 C+ AV 182,100 23-MAY-14 180,000 ED05-076.10-02-01.00 11C R10 101 MIFFLIN RD 1 16 1963 1 1766 C+ AV 140,100 23-MAY-14 147,500 ED05-076.10-03-44.00 16A R10 1402 WOODMILL DR 1 8 1991 2 1445 C+ AV 139,700 23-MAY-14 138,000 ED05-076.11-02-35.00 16 R10 1162 S FARMVIEW DR 1 5 1988 2 1916 C+ AV 172,100 11-MAY-14 165,000 ED05-076.13-05-19.00 25 R10 48 WESTOVER DR 1 5 2001 2 2802 B- AV 199,400 08-MAY-14 205,000 LC05-058.17-03-20.00 1 R10 21 WELCH DR 1 11 1988 1 1080 D AV 90,700 01-MAY-14 70,000 LC05-068.00-01-12.00 21 R10 2068 WHITE OAK RD 1 14 1998 1 1512 C FR 158,200 13-MAY-14 169,500 LC05-068.08-01-06.00 3A R10 101 MOURNING DOVE LN 1 9 1990 2 2887 B+ VG 281,100 23-MAY-14 210,000

Residential Appeal Values after Name PIN # Property Address# Amount Reque. Amount Appeal NEIL FREDERICK A & DAWN F LC05-058.18-02-010.521-000 521 WEAVER DR $119,600 na 119,600 SCHMIDT ROBERT H & MARGARET LC05-058.18-02-01.149 149 MAUREEN PL $126,400 126,400 BRAKSATOR THOMAS A & BARBARA N LC05-058.14-01-01.309 309 PERSIMMON CIR W $107,400 $80,000 107,400 ALEXITCH JEAN A ED05-077.06-01-71.00 412 E LOOCKERMAN ST $323,100 $250,000 323,100 $676,500 676,500 Commercial Appeal Values after Name PIN# Property Address# Amount Reque. Amount Appeal CONMAL PROPERTIES LLC ED05-077.09-04-18.00 6 W LOOCKERMAN ST $2,274,300 1,669,100 CONMAL PROPERTIES LLC ED05-077.09-04-20.00 8 W LOOCKERMAN ST $1,021,800 749,900 RAUER ANDREAS ED05-086.00-02-07.00 .67 AC OLD RUDNICK LN $304,100 $255,000 255,000 RAUER ALICE ED05-086.00-02-07.01 16 OLD RUDNICK LN $984,000 $745,000 764,400 MARVIN F. POER AND COMPANY ED05-077.10-01-55.00 21 S LITTLE CREEK RD $1,746,100 $1,247,000 1,746,100 $6,330,300 5,184,500 Exempt Request Name PIN# Property Address # Amount Reque. Amount RECTOR WARDENS & VESTRYMEN OF CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH ED05-077.09-05-45.00 509 S STATE ST $48,700 $0 0 YMCA ED05-067.18-02-01.00 825 KENTON RD $0 $0 0 CENTRAL DE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ED05-076.10-02-58.00 70 MIFFLIN RD $0 $0 0 CENTRAL DE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ED05-076.08-05-72.00 41 S QUEEN ST $23,200 $0 0 BIBLE CHURCH OF GOD, INC ED05-068.14-03-55.00 1202-1204 WHITE OAK RD $192,300 $0 0 BIBLE CHURCH OF GOD, INC ED05-068.14-03-56.00 LAND SPRUANCE RD EXT $4,200 $0 0 VILLAGE OF CANNON MILL HOA INC. Open Spaces 991,300 0 CENTRAL DE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY LC05-068.10-01-20.00 511 SCHOONER WAY 135,200 0 0 MILFORD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP ED05-067.18-01-47.00 1361-1383 WALKER RD 0 0 0 MILFORD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP ED05-067.18-01-66.01 1357 REAR WALKER RD 0 0 0 $1,394,900 Stipulations Name Pin# Property Address # Amount Reque. Amount JOSEPH TAYLOR EBONIE LC05-058.18-01-54.00 108 SUSAN PL $120,000 $82,000 88,900 SOLIMAN A SOLIMAN ED05-077.09-05-24.00 309 S STATE ST $200,000 $175,000 186,000 THOROUGHGOOD LORRAINE C & THOROUGHGOOD MARGARET ED05-067.13-01-47.00 271 CARNOUSTIE RD $279,200 $259,000 268,100 $17,402,600 $12,265,000

Residential Appeal Values before Appeal $676,500 Residential Appeal Values after Appeal $676,500 Difference $0 Commercial Appeal Values before Appeal $6,330,300 Commercial Appeal Values after Appeal $5,184,500 Difference $1,145,800 Total Amount for Exemptions $1,394,900 Values before Stipulation $599,200 Values after Stipulation $543,000 Difference $56,200

CITY MANAGER’S MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2014 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014

Customer Services  In the month of May, we processed 3,363 credit card payments for the month totaling $664,058.81. Human Resources  Continued contract negotiations. Library  493 attended 56 programs for adults.  436 attended 12 programs for teens.  458 attended 17 programs for children.  29 volunteers completed 328 hours of service.  135 attended 37 programs/classes coordinated through the Job Center. Public Works  Working on CIP and additional funding for future street program and other projects. 2 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014

CUSTOMER SERVICES WORK ORDERS PROCESSED Extensions of Credit 3,000 400 316 2,500 296 2,166 2,136 300 2,094 243 259 244 1,91 9 1,882 228 239 2,000 1,820 1,809 214 1,707 1,613 195 194 188 198 1,515 200 1 77 1,386 1,399 1,366 1,500 1,000 100 500 May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- 0 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 CUSTOMER PAYMENT USAGE CUTS FOR NON PAYMENT $1,971,399 80,000 $2,000,000 57,892 60,138 60,000 $1,600,000 40,000 $1,200,000 26,280 25,266 20,980 18,969 $800,000 20,000 $431,855 3,383 163 $400,000 $272,403 0 Drive-Thru Over the Mail, Drop Credit Cards Bank Drafts $- Window Counter Box 2014 YTD 2013YTD May 2014 May 2013 FYTD14 FYTD13 FY 2014 FY 2013 Major Program Updates May 2014 May 2013 Difference Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Number of Customers Served 21,233 21,632 (399) 232,419 252,720 Final Bills 696 780 (84) 6,993 6,901 Estimated Bills 177 159 18 1,883 1,745 Penalties Posted $ 18,793 $ 19,482 (688) $ 215,053 $ 214,527 Extensions of Credit - Amount Extended $ 95,197 $ 99,350 (4,153) $ 844,522 $ 904,657 Balance Transfers $ 11,945 $ 7,290 4,655 $ 62,751 $ 42,256 Utility Collections $ 26,596 $ 20,446 6,149 $ 272,787 $ 250,494 Special Assessments $ - $ - - $ - $ 659 Miscellaneous Billings $ 32,149 $ 178,607 (146,458) $ 1,246,978 $ 1,382,118 CNP through Disconnect Collars $ 14 $ 28 (14) 202 340 Court Cases - - - - - Tamperings - - - 4 18 Taxes Levied (includes carry forward) $ 250,968 $ 329,929 (78,960) $ 10,914,236 $ 10,921,443 Billing Adjustments $ (16) $ 142 (158) $ 27,727 $ 2,416 Total Taxes Collected $ 28,305 $ 41,884 (13,579) $ 10,719,316 $ 10,631,124 Taxes Outstanding $ 222,647 $ 287,903 (65,255) $ 222,647 $ 287,903 Payments in Lieu $ - $ - - $ - $ 45,000 Billing Accuracy (on schedule billings) 99.0% 99.0% - 99.0% 99.0% Bills Published on Schedule 99.0% 99.0% - 99.9% 99.9% Meters Read on Schedule 99.9% 99.9% - 99.9% 99.9% Customer Satisfaction Rating 99.9% 99.9% - 99.7% 99.7% Delinquent Accounts Collected 99.7% 99.7% - 99.8% 99.8% City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014 3

HUMAN RESOURCES May June July August Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May Category Total 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 * Caucasian 283 282 281 279 283 284 285 287 288 288 290 289 290 N/A * Minorities 53 53 54 54 54 56 55 56 57 57 58 58 58 N/A Hired 3 1 2 2 7 4 1 3 5 1 3 0 1 33 Terminated/ Resigned/ 8 2 1 3 2 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 23 Retired/Other Transferred/ 1 0 2 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 13 Promoted Jobs Posted 5 8 5 5 3 2 0 2 4 4 3 3 2 46 Workers Comp. Inju- 4 3 4 3 7 2 2 1 5 2 2 0 1 36 ries Workers Comp. Hours 28 0 119 62 384 110 48 120 116 0 128 125 51 1291 Insurance Claims 3 7 4 6 2 2 1 4 5 2 4 4 6 50 Full-time Employees: 331 Part-time Employees: 17 (4 Pitts Center, 1 Recreation, 11 Library, 1 Customer Service) -Numbers do not reflect, temporary, seasonal, relief fire dispatchers, committee or council members. Position Hired: Accountant II Retired/Transferred/Promoted: Motor Equipment Operator II to Building Craftsperson I Positions Posted: Inspector III (Fire Marshal), Utility Maintenance Mechanic I Unfilled/Open Positions by Department* Unfilled/Open Positions June July Au- Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May By Department 13 13 gust 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 13 Electric 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Public Works 22 20 20 16 15 15 14 13 13 13 13 11 Police 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 All Other Departments 6.5 6.5 6.5 6 7.5 6.5 5 6 5 5 5 4 Totals 33.5 32.5 33.5 29 28.5 27.5 25 24 24 23 24 21 *Not used for Budgeting Purposes ² The following has been updated to reflected the Fiscal 2013-14 Budget Electric: Electric Director, Electrical Engineer, (3) Lineman 1st Class Public Works: Utility Maintenance Mechanic II/Wastewater, Operations -Construction Manager, Motor Equipment Operator III (Streets), (2) Motor Equipment Operators II (Grounds), Motor Equipment Operator I (Water), Motor Equipment Operator III (Sanitation), Public Works Operation Manager, Civil Engineer l, Nursery Worker II, Grounds Superintendent Police: Police Officer All Other Departments: (2) Library Assistant (part-time), Storekeeper Buyer I, Fire Dispatcher, Assistant Finance Director 4 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014

HUMAN RESOURCES continued Workers Comp Injuries 20 15 10 5 0 Ma y- Jun- Jul - Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Ja n- Feb- Ma r- Apr- Ma y- 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 Electric Public Works Police Others Electric: 0 Public Works: 0 Police: 0 All Other Depts.: 1 Turnover Statistics 2010 2011 2012* 2013 * 2014 Total Turnover % 5.57 6.75 11.00 10.91 1.44 Termination Turnover % 0.27 1.08 0.29 1.47 0 Resignation Turnover % 2.12 4.05 5.21 5.01 .58 Retirement Turnover % 3.18 1.62 5.50 4.42 .87 * Healthcare cost sharing implemented ** Healthcare cost sharing implemented for DOE Average Employees 2010 2011 2012* 2013* 2014 Total Number of Employees Separating from Service 21 25 38 37 5 Average Number of Full-time Employees 362 356 333 325 330 Average Number of Part-time Employees 16 15 12 14 16 * Healthcare cost sharing implemented City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014 5

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Service Requests Resolved Citizen Action Center - Customers w/ New Issues 170 180 165 164 164 150 160 140 130 122 115 113 113 120 104 104 101 110 97 100 90 160 80 54 70 60 50 103 102 106 92 40 80 87 84 20 30 56 55 57 55 55 0 10 May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 Programming Requests Completed Page Views - City of Dover Web Page 16 15 15 15 15 35,000 14 14 13 30,000 12 12 12 12 11 10 25,000 Pages Viewed 10 8 20,000 8 29,413 29,435 27,721 25,562 25,827 26,455 26,498 26,428 15,000 24,615 23,682 6 4 3 10,000 21,716 21,692 19,884 2 5,000 0 0 May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 Current Performance Indicators Last Month Same Month Month Last Year iSeries Availability 100% 100% 100% Server Availability 100% 100% 100% AS/400 Connections (concurrent/authorized users) N/A N/A N/A PCs Supported 364 364 352 Scheduled PCs Replaced - - - Servers Supported 19 19 15 People Trained 14 28 19 Availability Statistics based on 7:00 AM until 5:00 PM Monday—Friday 6 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014

LIBRARY Reference Transactions 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Adult Teen Children May 14 Adults – 1112 Teens – 465 Children – 517 Circulation May 14 FYTD 14 May 13 FYTD 13 Dover residents 19,382 232,211 19,434 208,338 Ebooks 1,636 15,546 1,101 10,500 Kent residents* 13,965 165,432 14,750 162,466 Non-county residents 2,198 26,055 2,425 23,285 Registrations Dover residents 320 4,050 364 3,921 Kent residents* 35 729 70 1,305 Non-county residents 5 78 9 119 Other Visiting Patrons 26,434 294,715 24,940 288,553 Meeting Room Usage 1,739 20,849 2,425 12,820 Photocopier Usage 1,270 12,780 1,789 14,733 Computer Printing Usage 3,133 28,766 3,175 23,208 Computer Users 4,641 51,539 4,973 44,871 Wireless Computer Users 1,501 14,796 1,112 5,569 Holds (Total) 6,384 68,235 6,476 65,183 *Breakout of Kent County Residential Statistics Circulation Registrations Harrington: 146 Harrington: 1 Milford: 134 Milford: 1 Smyrna: 1,007 Smyrna: 2 Outside City Limits: 12,678 Outside City Limits: 31 Total Registered Users: (Card Holders) City: 23,392 Kent County: 12,679 Outside Kent County: 973 Other Points of Interest: Inter/Interlibrary: 59 items loaned out Technical services: 1,853 items added 39 items borrowed 1,051 items deleted Volunteers: 328 hours of service completed City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014 7

PUBLIC WORKS Administration Administrative review and inspection services continued on all residential and commercial developments. The following residential subdivisions are in various phases of construction: Oak Shadows Emerald Pointe Eden Hill (Residential) Patriot Village Clearview Meadows Village of Cannon Mill Sanitation Monthly Total Refuse (Tons) Sanitation Hours 1,500 1200 956 942 911 1000 927 1,000 845 855 875 873 790 777 800 673 679 699 598 501 550 600 455 500 356 346 330 298 315 400 250 238 263 171 173 146 146 127 146 171 200 38 37 - 0 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Bulk Collection Mechanized Hand Trash Container 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 Collection Collection Repair/Delivery Bulk Automated May 14 May 13 MAY 2014 FYTD 14 MAY 2013 FYTD 13 Trips to DSWA Sandtown Landfill 192 2,060 219 1,766 Total Tonnage to DSWA 1,098.46 10,398 1,206.10 8,663 90-Gallon Containers Delivered 26 209 30 250 300-Gallon Containers Delivered 8 28 2 27 Total Man Hours-containers Delivered 38 349 37 411 CURBSIDE RECYCLING TOTAL # OF TOTAL # OF STATS HOUSEHOLDS ACCOUNTS WEIGHT/LBS. AVE. LBS. COLLECTED May 2014 17,848 8,924 311,740 17.47 8 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014

PUBLIC WORKS continued Streets MAY 2014 FYTD 14 MAY 2013 FYTD 13 Signed Installed 39 475 42 258 Signs Repaired 17 171 12 100 Curbs Painted Yellow (feet) 8,335 20,965 12,683 33,161 New Post Installed 9 74 0 35 Storm Catch Basins Repaired 4 23 0 1 Storm Catch Basin Repairing (Hrs.) 39 166 0 1 Storm Catch Basins Cleaned 3 305 0 6,266 Storm Catch Basins Cleaning (Hrs.) 3 167 0 1,064 Hot Mix Patching (Tons) 0 1 0 236 Hot Mix Patching (Hrs.) 0 0 0 283 Cold Mix Patching Hrs.) 8 266 0 523 Concrete Work (Hrs) 60 296 0 273 Concrete Patching (Cubic Yards) 0 27 0 0 Ditch Work (Hrs). 0 99 0 122 Street and Alley Maintenance (Hrs) 160 754 74 1,410 Street Sweeping (Miles) 1,558 9,214 1,480 11,368 Street Sweeping (Cubic Yards) 390 2,262 384 2,768 Leaves Collected (Cubic Yards) 0 8,676 0 14,527 Leaf Collection (Miles) 0 4,796 0 5,979 Grounds Total Work Orders = 9 General = 7 Arborist = 6 Arborist Crew MAY 2014 MAY 2013 Trees Trimmed 8 14 Trees Removed 6 1 Stumps Removed 4 0  Mowed grass a good portion of the month  Pulled 2 trees out of Silver Lake  Pulled vines from tree at Silver Lake  Injected Elm trees Beautification Crew  Dig up tulips from beds  Tilled up flower beds  Planted flower beds Mowing Crew  Mowed grass at various city locations  26 hours of spraying of poison ivy and weeds City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014 9

PUBLIC WORKS continued Geographic Information Systems (GIS)  Created and printed various posters for Economic Development Office, Mayor’s Office, Public Works and Dover Public Library.  Travelled to Bridgeville, DE for the Delmarva GIS Conference.  Created Miss Utility maps for Karins Engineering.  Coded the 45,000 record Voter List for the Mayor’s special election.  Covered PW Admin phones during absences and during meetings.  Created and maintained various GIS layers such as Parcels, Rentals, Curbside Recycling, Fleet Maintenance, etc.  Created and printed various maps for the Public Works, Tax Assessor’s Office, Planning & Inspections and the City Manager’s Office.  Trained Staff on the updates to the ArcGIS System and ArcGIS Online. Fleet and Facilities Management Fleet Maintenance PM Work Orders Completed: 16 Number of Tire Repairs: 7 Number of Road Repairs: 4 Other Work Orders: 46 Repair Hours: 111.0 Road Repair Hours: 4.5 Total Work Orders: 62 Fabrication Hours: 4.0 Misc. Hours: 5.0 PM Hours: 80.0 Major Program Updates MEASURE APRIL 2014 APRIL 2013 DIFFERENCE Scheduled Preventative Mainte- 16 out of 29 17 out of 29 nance appointments being kept 55.17 % - 3.45 % 58.62 % (Quantity and Percentage) Facilities Management Routine work orders completed 29 out of 29 22 out of 24 within 5 days (Quantity and Per- 8.33 % 100 % 91.67 % centage) Emergency work orders completed 1 out of 1 2 out of 2 within 2 days (Quantity and Per- 0% 100 % 100 % centage) 10 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014

PUBLIC WORKS continued Water/Wastewater Water Production/Billed Consumption/Flow to Kent County 255000000 205000000 155000000 105000000 55000000 5000000 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 Total Water Prod. Billed Consumpt. Total Flow to County City Readings ENGINEERING SUMMARY Major Program Updates MAY 2014 MAY 2013 DIFF FY14 YTD FY13 State and Federal Violations 0 violations 0 violations - - - Water Quality Complaints 5 1 +4 103 112 Plan Review Completed Within 9 plans 5 plans +4 89 82 30 days of Submission 100% 100% OPERATIONAL SUMMARY Task MAY 14 MAY 13 CURRENT FY 1,388,899,00 Water Production - Daily Average 4,148,839 4,176,710 0 Average Field Response Time (goal is <30 minutes) 16.84 20.08 17.24 Water Mains Repaired 1 2 5 Water Service Lines Repaired 4 2 11 Wastewater Mains Repaired 0 0 0 Wastewater Service Lines Repaired 0 2 3 Sewer Lines Flushed - linear feet 178,134 185,475,000 1,208,931 Sewer Mains Videoed -linear feet 0 5,974 19,733 Total Fire Hydrants in Service 1,818 1,806 1,818 Total Water Meters in City Distribution System 14,212 14,115 14,212 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014 11

PUBLIC UTILITIES Electric System Peak Total System Load 200 100,000 164.2 80,225 150.9 156.8 141.5 144.8 70,462 67,058 66,408 128.14 80,000 123.6 118.24 60,085 60,871 59,792 58,463 60,375 150 57,155 56,064 105.94 108.35 106.4 55,369 51,922 99.89 96.14 60,000 100 40,000 50 20,000 May 13 Jun 13 Jul 13 Aug 13 Sep 13 Oct 13 Nov 13 Dec 13 Jan 14 Feb 14 Mar 14 Apr 14 May 14 May 13 Jun 13 Jul 13 Aug 13 Sep 13 Oct 13 Nov 13 Dec 13 Jan 14 Feb 14 Mar 14 Apr 14 May 14 Outages Customers of Gained/Lost 35 8,000 45 39 40 25 6,000 35 Customers 30 Outages 15 4,000 25 20 15 15 10 11 9 5 2,000 10 7 5 5 5 7 2 4 3 5 0 -5 May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May 0 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 May 13 Jun 13 Jul 13 Aug 13 Sep 13 Oct 13 Nov 13 Dec 13 Jan 14 Feb 14 Mar 14 Apr 14 May 14 Outages Customers Outages: 5 Customers: 97 Electric Monthly Outage Report The annual outage goal will be less than 295 Controllable Outages Average Response Time minutes per customer, which is a Delaware Annual goal is less than 40 Goal is less than 30 minutes Standard. This will be measured by calculating the System Average Interruption Duration Index. Month Year-to-date Month Year-to-date FY 14 YTD FY 13 FY 12 4 36 29.4 Minutes 28.3 Minutes 67.75 50.74 39.44 MAY 14 MAY 13 FY14 YTD PROGRAM UPDATES Tree Trimming 330 127 2361 Number of Oil Releases 1 0 11 Lost Time Accidents – All Electric Utility Divisions 0 0 2 New Services 7 10 103 Major Goals Completed in the Past Two Months N/A 12 City Manager’s Monthly Report, May 2014

City Planner’s Monthly Report Planning, Inspections & Recreation MAY 2014 Planning, Inspections & Recreation Highlights  Healthy Community Award - Dover was one of the five towns taking home the 2014 Recognition for Community Health Promo‐ tion. The City of Dover made significant steps to promote health in our community. The recognition is sponsored by the Governor’s Council on Health Promotion and Dis‐ ease Prevention and the Delaware Coalition for Healthy Eating and Active Living (DE HEAL).  Dover Days - The 81st annual Dover Days festival saw approximately 50,000 attendees over the 3 day event. Sherwanda Rachal‐Speaks worked with the Kent County Tourism office closely covering all logistics for the festival.  Bike To Work Day - Sixteen bike riders participated in our 2nd Annual Bike to Work day although the weather did not cooperate. Look forward to more great Bike to Work month events in May 2015!  Spring Summer Performing Arts Series On The Green - Kicking off this season with Miss Delaware, we hosted 50 at the Dover Public Library as inclement weather set in. A special thank you goes out to our Gold Sponsor: Eden Hill Medical Group and our Silver Sponsors: Calpine, PNC Bank and the YMCA.  On May 15, 2014 Tracey Harvey attended Homeownership Training at the New Penn Financial Office.  On May 16, 2014 Dave Truax retired from the City of Dover after 18 years of service.  On May 27, 2014 Tracey Harvey attended Dover First Start Homeownership Training at the NCALL Office.

Planning, Inspections & Recreation Revenue FY '14 Budget FY '14 Actual Revenue Stream LOOKING FORWARD ….. Business License $1,460,000 $ 1,448,742 99% The following ac vi es are Trailer License $20,500 $ 21,559 105% planned for June and will be Building Permits $400,000 $ 570,838 143% reported in the June Monthly Cert. of Occupancy $9,000 $ 4,910 55% report: Public Occupancy $10,000 $ 9,699 97%  Community Cra Show /Yard Lodging House $14,000 $ 14,574 104% Sale on June 7, 2014. Plumbing/Heating/Air $75,000 $ 63,603 85%  African American Fes val Sprinkler $25,000 $ 22,286 89%  NASCAR Race Rental Inspection Fee $345,000 $ 349,818 101%  Firefly Fes val Miscellaneous $20,000 $ 42,681 213%  Summer Camps Fire Protection Fees $31,000 $ 31,940 103%  Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans Workshop Vacant Building Reg. $60,000 $ 144,750 241% Total P&I Revenue $2,469,500 $ 2,725,400 110% Recreation $133,000 $135,960 102% PLANNING OFFICE The Planning Office is part of the review process for certain types of construction activity permits (Building Permits, Sign Permits, etc.) and Certificate of Occupancy permits. For May 2014, Planning Staff was in- volved with review of 99 Permits and 3 Certificates of Occupancy permits (2014 calendar year total of 328 Permits and COs compared to 368 for 2013). Planning Staff also reviews new applications for Business Li- censes and Rental Dwelling Permits. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Planning Staff continues to focus on the various implementation items identified in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as amended.  On-going efforts of the Planning Office include participating in planning planning and development de- sign of Garrison Oak Technical Park, the pending updates to the FIRM Maps (Flood Insurance Rate maps) issued by FEMA for flood plains, and research for future ordinance amendments. Planning Staff attended the Delaware Population Consortium meeting on May 29, 2014 to discuss contract for development of the yearly population projections. It is expected that a cost sharing formula will be developed for all member agencies to assist in funding the development of the yearly projections beginning in 2015. The Delaware Population Consortium provides 30-year population and employment projections for the State, counties, and selected municipalities including the City of Dover.

 A proposed package of Text Amendments to the Commercial, Office, and Institutional zoning districts was again discussed with the Parks, Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee of City Coun- cil on May 12, 2014. The series of Amendments began the formal review process with the Frist Reading at City Council on May 27, 2014 and was referred to the Planning Commission for review in June. Update to Floodplain Regulations A series of text amendments to the City’s Floodplain Regulations to be in compliance with FEMA’s regulations for the National Flood Insurance Pro- gram (NFIP) have been developed by staff with additional technical assis- tance is provided by DNREC and their flood ordinance consultant. The Or- dinance #2014-09 is proposed to amend the Dover Code of Ordinances, Chapter 50 – Floods and other related chapters. After presentation to the Legislative Finance and Administration Committee of City Council, the First Reading was conducted by City Council on May 27, 2014 with final action scheduled for June 9, 2014. This review and update of the City’s Floodplain Regulations is required as new FIRM Maps (Flood Insur- ance Rate maps) will become effective in July 2014. New Dover High School Project (C-10-05/S-11-18) Construction activities related to site improvements and the building construction activities continue at the new Dover High School project site along with the associated inspections of the building and site. A special meeting with eh Fire Marshal’s Office was held May 21st regarding outstanding fire protection items and how to authorize furniture move-in. The monthly coordination meeting on the project was held on May 22, 2014. The sidewalk improvement project for the north side of Route 8 and the HAWK are in the bid process at DelDOT. An additional coordination meeting will be necessary for the pending start of construction of the East Entrance, HAWK signal, and sidewalk project. Information on each agency’s requirements for compli- ance in order to allow furniture move-in, in order to issue a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy, and to is- sue a Final Certificate of Occupancy continue to be discussed. Construction Activity  Planning Staff attended the groundbreaking ceremony for the Uzin Utz Manufacturing facility to be con- structed at 200 Garrison Oak Drive (Lot 12 of the Garrison Oak Technical Park). The project is complet- ing the Final Site Plan (S-13-20) process and the Building Permit application has been filed in anticipa- tion of a June construction start.  The Planning Staff continues to participate in weekly coordination conference calls with Calpine regard- ing the Garrison Energy Center project at 450 Garrison Oak Drive (Lot 7 of the Garrison Oak Technical Park). The Final/Final Administrative Site Plan (S-12-17) approval for the Garrison Energy Center Phase 1 was granted on September 6, 2013 subject to conditions of approval and the project construction is well underway.

BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTIVITY Planning Commission The Planning Commission met on May 21, 2014. The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for June 16, 2014.  S-14-11 Site Improvements at 6 South State Street— Recommended conditional approval of the Site Plan and Architectural Review Certification for site improvements and development of off-street parking as associated with the building’s conversion to office space. The approval includes Staff and DAC com- ments, approval for the northernmost parking space, the curbing waiver and the waiver for parking reduc- tion to sixteen (16) spaces.  SB-14-01 Dover Mall at 1365 N. DuPont Highway: Minor Subdivision Plan—Recommended condi- tional approval of the Minor Subdivision Plan and that recommendation of approval to be forwarded to City Council for a waiver of the requirements for lot frontage on a public street. Conditions of approval include requiring the necessary easements listed in the DAC report to be in place for the two parcels of land.  SB-14-02 Lands of Union A.M.E. Church at 222 West Reed Street - Recommended conditional ap- proval of the Minor Subdivision to create new parcels of land.  SB-14-03 Lands of Robert & Kathleen Dunn at 276 Troon Road - Moved to defer action on applica- tion SB-14-03 until next month so that legal counsel can be obtained.  US-14-01 Dover High School at One Dover High Drive—Recommended conditional approval of Dover High School Unified Comprehensive Signage Plan for the new high school at One Dover High Drive as submitted including freestanding signage, directional signs, and building signs. Board of Adjustment The Board of Adjustment met on May 21, 2014. The next regular scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjust- ment is scheduled for June 18, 2014. The following applications were considered:  V-14-06 Application involving subdividing property into two parcels front and rear at 328 N. DuPont Highway–Moved that application V-14-06 be deferred until next month in order to have exact measurements and dimensions for the overhand of both buildings and any changes. Historic District Commission The Historic District Commission did not meet in May. The next Historic District Commission meeting is scheduled for June 19, 2014.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CDBG FY13 Projects Contracts for FY13 projects have been executed and projects are underway.  Homeownership Assistance Program Three (3) first-time homebuyers were provided downpayment assistance to purchase afforda- ble housing in the City of Dover.  MHDC Homeowner Rehabilitation Program CDBG funds will be used to rehabilitate owner occupied homes in the City of Dover found in violation of the City’s housing code. Five (5) homes have been completed. Dover Interfaith Mission to the Homeless CDBG funds will be used for operations costs for the shelter.  MHDC Emergency Home Repair Project CDBG funds will be used to assist very low income homeowners with emergency repairs to eliminate severe housing conditions that constitute health and safety hazards. Seven (7) homes have been completed.  NCALL Research CDBG funds will be utilized for foreclosure prevention and pre-purchase homeownership counseling services for up to ten (10) Dover residents.  Elizabeth W. Murphey School CDBG funds will be used for minor renovations for one of the facilities that services children that are at risk for homelessness. Replacement of the windows has been completed.  Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) The City was awarded $1,426,740 for the acquisition and rehab of foreclosed properties to be sold to qualifying families. A total of $2,080,554 including program income has been ex- pended on the acquisition and renovations for eleven (11) properties. Ten (10) properties have been sold, and one is a rental that serves persons with disabilities. Ten (10) first-time homebuyers have purchased homes through the NSP Settlement Assistance Program. 218 Ann Avenue (sold) 337 N. Governors Avenue (sold) 343 Mimosa Avenue (sold) 254 Green Blade Drive (sold) 907 Woodcrest Avenue (sold) 302 Stone Brook Place (sold) 1430 S. Hancock (group home rental) 11 Westover Drive (sold) 1415 S. Hancock (sold) 110 Thames Drive (sold) 4 Bennington Street (sold)

Dangerous Buildings, Vacant Buildings & Demolitions  200 N. West Street—The owner was granted their request for a use variance by the City Board of Adjustment on January 27th. Permits have been obtained for renovations & a privacy fence.  27 N. New Street—Home has been demolished.  814 Maple Parkway—A lien search was ordered for the property. The in-ground pool has been condemned as an unsafe structure and will be taking forward to Council as a danger- ous structure. On April 14, 2014 Council approved staff’s recommendation to have the pool demolished. The owners were given until May 14, 2014 to have the pool demol- ished, or the City would proceed with demolition. Demolition is scheduled for June.  409 South DuPont Highway—Notice was sent to the owner to have repairs made or the property will go forward to City Council on April 14, 2014 to have Council declare it dan- gerous. The owner of the property has obtained a structural engineers report and has sub- mitted plans to renovate the structure.  39 N. New Street—The home has been demolished by the owners of the property.  12 N New Street—Council approved Staff’s recommendation for demolition and gave the owner until May 28, 2014 to demolish the structure or the City would proceed with demo- lition. An asbestos survey is scheduled for June and bid specs have been placed on the City website.  640 Nimitz Rd—15 day notice sent to owners to repair or demolish the structure by June 8, 2014.  238 N New St—15 day notice sent to owners to repair or demolish the structure by June 8, 2014.  803 Westview Terrace—A lien search has been ordered for the property.  231 Mifflin Rd—A lien search has been ordered for the property.  Vacant Buildings—During the month of May, twenty-four (24) additional buildings were registered as vacant, and $10,750.00 in vacant building registration fees were collected.

Code Enforcement Activity—MAY Case Type # cases current # cases % staff ini ated % staff ini ated month YTD current month YTD No valid Rental Permit 8 137 50% 96% No valid Building Permit 7 27 75% 78% Tall grass and weeds 312 409 88% 90% Unregistered vehicle 5 19 100% 95% Abandoned vehicle 8 48 75% 85% Annual Housing Inspec on 4 226 100% 93% Property Maintenance – 85 281 76% 74% Exterior Electric Termina on 67 147 99% 99% Dover Code of Ordinances 50 255 54% 71% Zoning 3 41 100% 78% Total Cases 549 1590 Total # of Inspec ons For 411 Month 238 N. New Street

Fire Marshal’s Office, Building Inspections & Licensing Summary LIFE SAFETY Inspec ons MAY 14 FYTD 14 MAY 13 FYTD 13 Annual Fire/Life Safety Inspec ons 15 162 46 307 Fire/Code/DCO Complaints 10 168 67 383 Inspec on Deficiencies from AFI 18 261 35 135 C/O & Acceptance Tests 4 15 0 46 Administra ve Walk Thru 13 ‐ ‐ ‐ Accidental $0 $1,127,000 $0 $96,450.00 Incendiary $100,000 $100,00 $0 $16,100.00 Undetermined $45,000 $65,000 $15,000 $91,000.00 PERMITTING AND LICENSING Permits Issued MAY 14 FYTD 14 MAY 13 FYTD 13 Administra ve Permit 5 10 2 25 Building Addi on/Renova on Permits 34 135 36 293 Building Permits 20 63 25 143 Demoli on Permits 9 22 6 50 Fence Permits 20 37 14 91 Fire Preven on Permits 7 29 7 104 Mechanical Permits 21 134 26 270 Plumbing Permits 18 111 43 322 Sign Permits 29 93 19 231 Swimming Pool Permits 4 5 2 4 Business Licenses 103 114 119 1180 Merchant Licenses 3 15 3 275 Contractor Licenses 36 156 36 771 Lodging House Licenses 0 44 1 52 Mobile Homes 3 23 1 233 Public Occupancy 16 310 16 363 Rental Dwelling 35 2862 54 3054 BUILDING INSPECTIONS Inspec ons MAY 14 FYTD 14 MAY 13 FYTD 13 Building 276 1009 269 3,140 Plumbing/Mechanical 316 1303 310 3,255 Cer ficate of Occupancy 3 39 10 91

Fire Marshal’s Office—At a Glance Large Loss Fire Investigation at 640 Nimitz Road on 05/06/14 Recreation Division Enrollment Summary May 2013 verses May 2014 400 FY13 FY14 200 0 General Recreation Sports Trips Leagues Category FY13 FY14 General Recrea on 148 148 Sports 69 87 Trips 35 45 Leagues #’s are s ll coming in Camps 26 26

Revenue Breakdown: May 2013 verses May 2014 General Recreation General Recreation Sports Sports Trips Trips Leagues Leagues Building & Field Rentals Camps General Recreation $2,762 General Recreation $2,326.50 Sports $1220 Sports $1225 Camps $3,605 Trips $375 Leagues $13,005 Trips $70 Building & Field Rentals $1,585 Leagues $16,250 Camps $1,920 Building & Field Rentals $1,130 Youth Fishing Derby ‐ Silver Lake

John W. Pitts Recreation Center – MAY 2014 Total Program Attendance Facility Usage By The Hour 14,000 800 12,000 10,000 600 8,000 400 6,000 4,000 200 2,000 0 May 13 0 May 13 June 13 July 13 Aug 13 June 13 July 13 Aug 13 Sept 13 Oct 13 Nov 13 Sept 13 Oct 13 Nov 13 Dec 13 Jan 14 Feb 14 Dec 13 Jan 14 Feb 14 Mar 14 Apr 14 May 14 Mar 14 Apr 14 May 14 ** Program Attendance figures includes daily participants, parents and spectators in the facility. Facility Usage By The Hour MAY 14 FYTD 14 MAY 13 FYTD 13 Open Gym 533.5 4,707 551.5 5,190.25 Fitness Classes 41.5 576.5 55.5 530.25 Leagues 30 840 15 739 Camps 0 587.5 0 81.5 Sports Classes 10.5 214.25 17 185 Meetings & Rentals 16 292.5 28.5 326.5 Enrichment Classes 6 68.5 5.5 57.5 Total Facility Usage Hours 637.5 7,389.75 673 7,110 Daily Program Attendance** MAY 14 FYTD 14 MAY 13 FYTD 13 Total 1,286 47,150 2,298 46,727 Open Gym 386 4,961 860 7,725 Fitness Classes 275 3,660 355 3,440 Leagues 350 27,627 325 26,383 Camps 0 1,438 0 369 Sports Classes 126 2,239 104 1,493 Meetings & Rentals 144 7,064 649 6,121 Enrichment Classes 5 161 5 115 Since our opening in late April 2008, we have had 319,369 guests at the John W. Pitts Recreation Center. May Open Gym Registrations and Packages Sold Packages Sold: March. MTD YTD FYTD Daily: 21 $63 350 $1,050 Individual Quarterly: 2 $30 23 $345 Individual Annual: 0 $0 1 $ 50 Family Quarterly: 0 $0 6 $180 Family Annual: 0 $0_ 2 __ $200___ Revenue: $93 $1,825

CITY OF DOVER FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY DEPARTMENTS MAY 2014 - MONTHLY BUDGET REPORTS PLEASE NOTE – THIS REPORT PROVIDES TOP LINE INFORMATION ON THE OPERATING FUNDS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT.

CITY OF DOVER ACTIVITY REPORTS May 2014 SSS FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY LEVELS FY13 YTD FY14 YTD BANK TRENDS Number of Deposits Made (Hand, ACH & Wire, Lockbox) 4,651 5,363 Total Amount of All Deposits $ 125,822,461 $ 106,847,869 PAYROLL Hours % Amount Hours % Amount Gross wages per registers 697,236 100.0% $ 16,554,626 689,387 100.0% $ 16,041,866 Wages and Hours Worked Regular 583,897 83.7% $ 12,940,001 577,701 83.8% $ 12,446,931 All over time 30,515 4.4% $ 1,334,274 29,832 4.3% $ 1,190,589 Other Paid or Unpaid Wages and Hours Vacation 35,505 5.1% $ 919,112 35,207 5.1% $ 915,071 Sick 16,575 2.4% $ 413,877 14,399 2.1% $ 364,648 Terminal Leave - Retiree Vacation/Sick Payout 16,613 2.4% $ 480,164 10,927 1.6% $ 348,596 Comp Time 6,828 1.0% $ 192,487 7,059 1.0% $ 198,144 Personal 1,455 0.2% $ 40,895 1,249 0.2% $ 35,485 Leave Without Pay 4,397 0.6% $ - 3,889 0.6% $ - Other (description below) 1,452 0.2% $ 233,816 9,127 1.3% $ 542,368 Other includes: pay adjustments, military differential pay, training, committee meetings, worker compensation tracking/adjustments, etc. Other Activity Number of Pay Periods 21 21 Number of Payroll Checks & Direct Deposits Issued 7,616 7,563 Number of Pension Checks Issued 2,478 2,563 Total Pension Benefits Paid - Defined Benefit Plan $ 4,100,437 $ 4,313,502 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Number of Check Vouchers 5,090 5,032 Number of EFT Vouchers 1,843 1,742 Vouchers Dollar Amount Disbursed $ 73,416,527 $ 69,355,572 PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY ACTIVITY LEVELS Contingency & Warehouse Stock Items on Hand with No Usage $2,700,000 2400 $730 $2,600,000 2200 $630 $2,500,000 Total Dollar Value Total Line Items 2000 $2,400,000 $530 1800 $2,300,000 Thousands $430 $2,200,000 1600 $330 $2,100,000 1400 $230 $2,000,000 1200 $130 Total Dollar Value Total Line Item s $30 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Value: $2,632,067.94 Line Items: 1,456 Series1 Series2 Series3 Electric: $665,896 Water: $29,993 General: $34,190 Unleaded: 10,769.6 gallons Diesel: 6,854.8 gallons Total Cost: $ 53,994 Electric $ 16,515 Water $ 2,372 General $ 4,425

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 General Fund Summary Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance $ 3,455,200 $ 4,219,800 $ - $ 4,219,800 Revenues Court of Chancery Fees 863,200 1,002,200 858,120 144,080 Fines & Police Revenues 1,316,000 1,223,900 909,798 314,102 Franchise Fees 606,200 636,000 477,754 158,246 Grants 623,500 623,500 570,961 52,539 Intrafund Services 4,454,300 4,933,000 3,925,167 1,007,833 Library & Recreation Revenues 599,600 679,300 628,670 50,630 Licenses & Permits 2,627,500 2,792,500 2,949,091 (156,591) Property Taxes (Includes BID Revenue) (1) 11,169,500 11,095,500 11,105,593 (10,093) Miscellaneous Revenues 138,300 93,100 76,563 16,537 Sanitation Revenues 2,676,500 2,595,600 2,380,400 215,200 Garrison Farm Rent Revenue 118,500 118,500 92,956 25,544 Transfers-In from Special Funds & Utilities Municipal Street Aid Fund 527,400 663,900 497,955 165,945 Civil Traffic Penalties 600,000 368,400 259,654 108,746 Transfer Taxes 1,315,500 1,393,000 1,455,403 (62,403) Verizon, Contingency and CI Reserves 32,000 32,000 271,000 (239,000) Police Grants 110,000 126,800 63,365 63,435 Water/Wastewater Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 - Electric Fund 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 - Total Revenues 36,278,000 36,877,200 35,022,450 1,854,750 Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 39,733,200 $ 41,097,000 $ 35,022,450 $ 6,074,550 Expenditures City Clerk & Council $ 442,200 $ 479,500 $ 415,662 $ 63,838 Mayor, City Manager & Human Resources 874,900 936,400 875,779 60,621 Police & Police Extra Duty 14,331,800 14,873,600 13,081,309 1,792,291 Public Services 4,131,800 4,587,600 3,846,312 741,288 Procurement & Inventory, Facilities Mgmt., Vehicle Maint. 1,870,900 2,019,400 1,760,067 259,333 Planning & Inspections 2,045,600 2,267,400 2,007,344 260,056 Finance, Info Tech & Customer Services 2,676,400 2,952,200 2,586,244 365,956 Library & Recreation 2,038,600 2,054,100 1,786,462 267,638 Fire Department 692,100 741,600 636,977 104,623 Assessor 198,300 208,400 191,629 16,771 Contribution to DDP 162,400 162,400 121,800 40,600 Miscellaneous Grant Expense 25,000 25,000 - 25,000 Other Employment Expenses 400,000 - - 0 Insurance 658,900 658,900 655,998 2,902 OPEB - Retiree’s Health Care Contribution 1,636,500 1,636,500 1,636,500 0 Police Pension Trust Contribution - State Grant 500,000 500,000 471,461 28,539 Appropriation to Employee Pension Fund - Unfunded Liability 1,159,100 121,000 121,000 0 Appropriation to Police Pension Fund 307,400 689,400 689,400 - Street Lights 836,000 774,500 709,064 65,436 Debt Service 557,300 557,300 552,051 5,249 Provision for Uncollectible 10,000 10,000 10,000 - Transfers Out Capital Projects Fund 1,278,300 1,448,800 1,448,800 - Total Expenditures 36,833,500 37,704,000 33,603,859 4,100,141 Budget Balance - Working Capital 2,899,700 3,393,000 - 3,393,000 Total Budget Balance & Expenditures $ 39,733,200 $ 41,097,000 $ 33,603,859 $ 7,493,141 Reserve Balances Contingency $ 723,600 $ 467,900 $ 467,057 (1) Property Taxes are the taxes billed and not cash received. The outstanding receivable balance as of 5/31/14 is $220,926 as compared to $287,606 in May 2013.

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 Water/Wastewater Fund Summary Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance - Water $ 770,800 $ 732,700 $ - $ 732,700 Beginning Balance - Wastewater $ 412,600 $ 441,400 $ - $ 441,400 Beginning Balance - Kent County Treatment $ 141,600 $ (17,300) $ - $ (17,300) 1,325,000 1,156,800 - 1,156,800 Revenues Water Fees 4,730,700 4,396,000 4,044,453 351,547 Wastewater Fees 3,642,700 3,529,000 3,250,721 278,279 Kent County Treatment Fees 2,980,300 2,900,000 2,673,452 226,548 Ground Water Inflow Adjustment 1,324,600 1,302,300 1,200,936 101,364 Water Tank Leases 333,800 321,200 304,965 16,235 Miscellaneous Service Fee 105,100 64,400 59,934 4,466 Impact Fees - Water 357,000 262,700 237,515 25,185 Impact Fees - Wastewater 323,000 237,900 216,922 20,978 Total Revenues 13,797,200 13,023,500 11,988,898 1,034,602 Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 15,122,200 $ 14,180,300 $ 11,988,898 $ 2,191,402 Expenses Water/Wastewater Operating Divisions Engineering & Inspection $ 664,400 $ 499,000 $ 399,735 $ 99,265 Water 433,900 474,700 447,634 27,066 Water Treatment Plant 1,501,800 1,495,200 1,255,135 240,065 Wastewater 945,100 885,700 777,254 108,446 Construction 351,400 340,800 322,015 18,785 Kent County Treatment 3,524,800 4,030,000 3,515,570 514,430 Intrafund Service Fees 1,233,400 1,458,800 1,133,580 325,220 Pension Unfunded Liability 339,400 - - - OPEB - Retiree's Health Care Contributions 200,000 200,000 200,000 - Debt Service 1,019,500 1,007,200 1,117,186 (109,986) Other Employment Expenses 25,000 10,800 - 10,800 Transfers Out General Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 - Water I & E Fund 1,200,000 1,233,200 1,233,200 - Wastewater I & E Fund 1,330,000 1,330,000 1,330,000 - Total Expenses 13,268,700 13,465,400 12,231,309 1,234,091 Budget Balances Budget Balance - Working Capital - Water 1,056,400 658,400 - 658,400 Budget Balance - Working Capital - WW 797,100 (98,500) - (98,500) Budget Balance-Working Capital - KSA - 155,000 - 155,000 Total Budget Balances 1,853,500 714,900 - 714,900 Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 15,122,200 $ 14,180,300 $ 12,231,309 $ 1,948,991 Reserve Balances Contingency-Water $ 105,600 $ 105,900 $ 104,691 Contingency-Wastewater $ 191,500 $ 191,500 $ 189,309 Impact Fee Reserve - Sewer NO BUDGET $ 2,820,000 $ 2,775,174 Impact Fee Reserve - Water NO BUDGET $ 200,500 $ 200,088 Bond Coverage Ratio (Covenant 1.20) 3.99 3.10 3.68

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 Electric Revenue Fund Summary Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance $ 7,152,400 $ 6,620,900 $ - $ 6,620,900 Revenues Sales to Customers 76,286,700 78,971,700 70,671,494 8,300,206 Utility Tax 1,492,200 1,312,300 1,149,613 162,687 Weyandt Hall Rents 251,000 180,000 146,895 33,105 Miscellaneous Revenues 737,800 709,100 665,857 43,243 Interest Earned 119,400 12,000 (3,195) 15,195 Transfer from Rate Stabilization 4,000,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 - Intrafund Service Receipts Water/Wastewater 98,500 98,500 94,158 4,342 Total Revenues 82,985,600 88,283,600 79,724,822 8,558,778 Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 90,138,000 $ 94,904,500 $ 79,724,822 $ 15,179,678 Expenses Power Supply & Generation Hedged Energy $ 23,832,000 $ 26,458,900 $ 26,569,813 $ (110,913) Power Supply Management 996,000 996,000 913,000 83,000 Capacity Charges 15,787,200 15,614,100 14,721,538 892,562 Dover Sun Park Energy 1,565,800 1,729,200 1,380,541 348,659 Solar Renewal Energy Credits 300,000 352,600 251,667 100,933 PJM Charges - Energy 12,812,900 17,274,000 14,402,128 2,871,872 PJM Charges - Transmission & Fees 4,740,000 7,420,000 6,966,116 453,884 Total Power Supply 60,033,900 69,844,800 65,204,803 4,639,997 Plant Operations 6,015,800 5,791,600 4,588,887 1,202,713 Generation Fuels - 1,603,800 2,354,893 (751,093) Capacity Credits (15,079,800) (15,079,800) (14,363,125) (716,675) PJM Spot Market Energy (230,500) (1,004,500) (802,303) (202,197) PJM Credits (397,000) (5,314,800) (5,708,446) 393,646 Total Generation (9,691,500) (14,003,700) (13,930,094) (73,606) Total Power Supply & Plant 50,342,400 55,841,100 51,274,709 4,566,391 Electric Operating Divisions: Transmission/Distribution 3,302,500 3,776,300 3,468,926 307,374 Electrical Engineering 1,192,200 1,285,300 1,178,141 107,159 Administration 597,000 628,400 482,178 146,222 Meter Reading 220,300 273,800 262,730 11,070 Systems Operations 543,600 675,800 684,588 (8,788) Intrafund Services 3,319,400 3,572,700 2,885,746 686,954 Utility Tax 1,492,200 1,312,300 1,149,613 162,687 OPEB Trust Contribution - Unfunded Liability 975,700 975,700 975,700 - OPEB - Retirees Health Care Contribution 513,300 513,300 513,300 - Pension Trust Contribution - Unfunded liability 1,314,200 - - - Interest on Deposits 27,000 20,000 19,185 815 Green Energy Payment to DEMEC 135,800 130,000 117,529 12,471 Accounts Receivable Write-Offs 200,000 200,000 200,000 - Other Employee Expenses 150,000 125,700 - 125,700 Contractual Services RFP's 100,000 100,000 22,194 77,806 Debt Service 3,301,900 3,301,900 3,116,090 185,810 Transfers Out: General Fund 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 - Electric Improvement & Extension Fund 5,448,600 4,918,600 4,918,600 - Total Expenses 81,176,100 85,650,900 79,269,229 6,381,671 Budget Balance - Working Capital 8,961,900 9,253,600 - 9,253,600 Total Budget Balance & Expenses $ 90,138,000 $ 94,904,500 $ 79,269,229 $ 15,635,271 Reserve Balances Contingency Reserve $ 826,500 $ 820,100 $ 818,787 Insurance Reserve $ 739,000 $ 738,300 $ 737,140 Rate Stabilization Reserve $ 13,644,000 $ 10,507,300 $ 10,461,306 Bond Coverage Ratio (Covenant 1.25) 1.97 3.43 0.49 Megawatt Hours Sold & Purchased Sales to Customers MWh (excluding Street Light MWh) 712,675 712,675 654,476 Sales per MWh $ 107.04 $ 110.81 $ 107.98 Purchased/Generated MWh 725,818 725,818 695,744 All In MWh Supply & Generation $ 69.36 $ 76.94 $ 73.70

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 General Capital Project Fund Summary Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance - Projects $ 241,200 $ 2,801,800 $ - $ 2,801,800 Beginning Balance - Library $ (74,700) $ 256,500 $ - $ 256,500 Revenues State Grant - Other 15,000 15,000 - 15,000 Interest Earnings - - 13,411 (13,411) Income from Sale of Assets - - 17,315 (17,315) Transfer from Community Transportation Fund - 60,500 60,500 - Transfer from General Fund for Projects 1,278,300 1,448,800 1,448,800 - Contractor Contributions - 264,800 264,765 35 Transfer from Parkland Reserve 95,000 80,000 - 80,000 MSA Capital Contribution - 251,200 - 251,200 Subtotal Revenues 1,388,300 2,120,300 1,804,791 315,509 State Grant - Library - 150,000 142,887 7,113 Library Capital Pledges - 5,000 8,250 (3,250) Subtotal Library Project Receipts - 155,000 151,137 3,863 Total Revenues 1,388,300 2,275,300 1,955,928 319,372 Total Beginning Balance & Revenue $ 1,554,800 $ 5,333,600 $ 1,955,928 $ 3,377,672 Expenditures Fire $ 238,500 $ 238,500 $ 238,515 $ (15) Grounds Maintenance 50,100 50,100 30,249 19,851 Library - 446,500 85,411 361,089 Recreation 95,000 172,000 - 172,000 Code Enforcement 30,000 30,900 16,751 14,149 Police 257,300 342,400 276,785 65,615 Streets 251,500 3,460,700 959,502 2,501,198 Sanitation 402,100 395,600 387,504 8,096 Information Technology 7,000 7,000 - 7,000 Facilities Management 17,800 17,800 17,795 5 Procurement & Inventory 55,000 55,000 - 55,000 Total Expenditures 1,404,300 5,216,500 2,012,512 3,203,988 Budget Balance - Projects 150,500 117,100 - 117,100 Total Budget Balance & Expenditures $ 1,554,800 $ 5,333,600 $ 2,012,512 $ 3,321,088 Reserve Balances Capital Asset Replacement Reserve $ 512,000 $ 509,800 $ 510,143 Parkland/Recreation $ 110,000 $ 203,800 $ 204,049

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 Water/Wastewater Improvement & Extension Fund Summary Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance - Water $ 1,620,000 $ 4,473,800 $ - $ 4,473,800 Beginning Balance - Wastewater $ 660,900 $ 2,807,000 $ - $ 2,807,000 Revenues Bond Proceeds - Water - 3,000,000 3,000,000 - Bond Proceeds - Wastewater - 1,067,900 1,005,960 61,940 State Loan-Wastewater 2011 - 62,000 62,000 - Arbitrage Rebate - IRS Refund - 66,000 68,614 (2,614) Income from Sale of Assets - - 4,343 (4,343) Interest Earned 25,000 25,000 52,420 (27,420) Transfer from Operating Fund for Water 1,200,000 1,233,200 1,233,200 - Transfer from Operating Fund for Wastewater 1,330,000 1,330,000 1,330,000 - Transfer from Impact Fee Reserve - Water 390,000 - - - Transfer from Impact Fee Reserve - Wastewater - 1,000,000 1,000,000 - Total Revenues 2,945,000 7,784,100 7,756,537 27,563 Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 5,225,900 $ 15,064,900 $ 7,756,537 $ 7,308,363 Expenses Water $ 1,476,800 $ 7,641,300 $ 1,098,298 $ 6,543,002 Wastewater 1,251,000 5,252,400 393,482 4,858,918 Water Construction 90,000 90,000 89,500 500 Total Expenses 2,817,800 12,983,700 1,581,280 11,402,420 Budget Balance - Working Capital - Water 1,655,700 1,021,200 - 1,021,200 Budget Balance - Working Capital - Wastewater 752,400 1,060,000 - 1,060,000 Total Budget Balances 2,408,100 2,081,200 - 2,081,200 Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 5,225,900 $ 15,064,900 $ 1,581,280 $ 13,483,620 Reserve Balances Capital Asset Replacement - Water $ 513,000 $ 514,000 $ 508,267 Capital Asset Replacement - Wastewater $ 512,300 $ 512,900 $ 507,104

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 Electric Improvement & Extension Fund Summary Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance $ 3,091,000 $ 3,868,500 $ - $ 3,868,500 Revenues Interest Earnings 25,200 25,200 7,801 17,399 Transfer from Electric Revenue Fund 5,448,600 4,918,600 4,918,600 - General Service Billing 440,000 440,000 250,238 189,762 Total Revenues 5,913,800 5,383,800 5,191,078 192,722 Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 9,004,800 $ 9,252,300 $ 5,191,078 $ 4,061,222 Expenses Electric Generation $ 2,117,800 $ 2,130,000 $ 1,152,419 $ 977,581 Transmission/Distribution 1,100,000 1,144,600 465,596 679,004 Electrical Engineering 2,405,800 2,615,500 1,045,245 1,570,255 Total Expenses 5,623,600 5,890,100 2,663,260 3,226,840 Budget Balance - Working Capital 3,381,200 3,362,200 - 3,362,200 Total Budget Balance & Expenses $ 9,004,800 $ 9,252,300 $ 2,663,260 $ 6,589,040 Reserve Balances Depreciation Reserve $ 9,977,100 $ 9,898,000 $ 9,910,789 Future Capacity Reserve $ 10,131,400 $ 10,076,200 $ 10,060,105 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 Community Transportation Improvement Fund Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance $ - $ 209,200 $ - $ 209,200 Revenues Grants Revenue 500,000 1,387,600 468,278 919,322 Interest Earned 500 500 295 205 Total Revenues 500,500 1,388,100 468,573 919,527 Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 500,500 $ 1,597,300 $ 468,573 $ 1,128,727 Expenses Program Expenses - Del Dot $ 500,000 $ 1,395,100 $ 941,217 $ 453,883 Program Expenses - City appropriated - 62,800 62,800 - Transfer to Capital Project Fund - 60,500 60,500 - Total Expenses 500,000 1,518,400 1,064,517 453,883 Budget Balance - Working Capital 500 78,900 - 78,900 Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 500,500 $ 1,597,300 $ 1,064,517 $ 532,783

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 Police Grant Funds Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance $ 100 $ 175,200 $ - $ 175,200 Revenues Grants Received 413,000 390,500 228,328 162,172 Interest Earned - - 736 (736) Total Revenues 413,000 390,500 229,064 161,436 Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 413,100 $ 565,700 $ 229,064 $ 336,636 Expenses Program Expenses/Supplies $ 191,000 $ 249,000 $ 128,003 $ 120,997 Computer Hardware 60,000 58,700 17,875 40,825 Telephone/Fax 15,000 15,000 14,902 98 Training/Conference/Food/Travel 36,000 32,000 - 32,000 Consulting/Audit Fees 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 Contractual services - 6,000 3,887 2,113 Operating Transfers - Out 110,000 126,800 63,365 63,435 Total Expenses 413,000 488,500 228,032 260,468 Budget Balance - Working Capital 100 77,200 - 77,200 Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 413,100 $ 565,700 $ 228,032 $ 337,668

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 Library Grant Fund Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance $ - $ 27,800 $ - $ 27,800 Revenues Grants Received 270,100 276,600 279,138 (2,538) Total Revenues 270,100 276,600 279,138 (2,538) Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 270,100 $ 304,400 $ 279,138 $ 25,262 Expenses Program Expenses/Supplies-State Grants $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 12,263 $ 15,737 Program Expenses/Supplies-Federal Grants - - 2,500 (2,500) Office Supplies 24,000 24,000 19,911 4,089 Printing/Duplicating 8,900 8,900 6,376 2,524 Postage 100 100 33 67 Books 124,900 124,900 89,947 34,953 Furniture 4,700 4,700 4,297 403 Audio Visual Supplies 74,000 74,000 56,102 17,898 Training/Conference/Food/Travel 3,500 3,500 1,666 1,834 Office Equipment/Repairs & Maintenance 2,000 2,000 3,213 (1,213) Total Expenses 270,100 270,100 196,308 73,792 Budget Balance - Working Capital - 34,300 - 34,300 Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 270,100 $ 304,400 $ 196,308 $ 108,092 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 CJC Grants/Aid Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - Revenues Grants Received 31,800 34,000 19,155 14,845 Total Revenues 31,800 34,000 19,155 14,845 Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 31,800 $ 34,000 $ 19,155 $ 14,845 Expenses Contractual Services $ 31,800 $ 34,000 $ 19,155 $ 14,845 Budget Balance - Working Capital - - - - Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 31,800 $ 34,000 $ 19,155 $ 14,845

City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 CDBG Fund Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance $ - $ 4,800 $ - $ 4,800 Revenues Grants Received 244,800 244,800 323,025 (78,225) Total Revenues 244,800 244,800 323,025 (78,225) Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 244,800 $ 249,600 $ 323,025 $ (73,425) Expenses Current Year Closing Cost/Down Payment Program $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 50,000 $ (10,000) Current year Dover Interfaith Ministry 27,500 27,500 34,286 (6,786) Current Year MHDC Emergency Home Repair 40,000 40,000 48,187 (8,187) Current Year Elizabeth W Murphy School 39,700 39,700 38,574 1,126 Current Year NCALL Research Inc. 8,900 8,900 4,500 4,400 Current Year Milford Housing H/O Rehabilitation 39,700 39,700 62,245 (22,545) Current Year Salaries 49,000 49,000 20,892 28,108 NSP Expense - - 78,716 (78,716) Total Expenses 244,800 244,800 337,400 (92,600) Budget Balance - Working Capital - 4,800 - 4,800 Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 244,800 $ 249,600 $ 337,400 $ (87,800) City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – May 2014 After School Program/Substance Abuse Prevention Fund Revised Budget Budget YTD Balance Beginning Balance $ - $ 41,000 $ - $ 41,000 Revenues Grants Received 55,630 36,900 37,167 (267) Recreation Revenue 33,000 33,000 28,727 4,273 Total Revenues 88,630 69,900 65,894 4,006 Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 88,630 $ 110,900 $ 65,894 $ 45,006 Expenses Temporary Help/Benefits $ 33,000 $ 54,000 $ 19,212 $ 34,788 Program Expenses/Supplies 55,630 36,900 23,545 13,355 Total Expenses 88,630 90,900 42,757 48,143 Budget Balance - Working Capital - 20,000 - 20,000 Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 88,630 $ 110,900 $ 42,757 $ 68,143

Monthly Report May 2014 Economic Development Office

2014_5 Economic Development  Weekly Calpine Conference Call  Set-up tour of E-ZPass for Senator Carper  Met with Cameron Llewellyn, Gregg Moore and Lauren Tinsley to discuss role of Merchants Committee in DDP  Attended DDP Parking Committee Meeting  Met with manager of E-ZPass to discuss building issues  Met with DEDO to discuss groundbreaking procedures for Uzin Utz  Provided K with Economic Development information for Mayor’s State of the City Address  Scheduled a visit for Congressman Carney at Kraft Foods  Conference Call with Gregg Moore, Scott Koenig and Philipp Utz regarding Kent Conservation District issues  Attended State of Delaware Bond Bill Committee meeting regarding Delaware State University Convocation Center  Attended DEED meeting  Met with Secretary O’Mara and executives from the Data Center regarding potential alternative site in Dover  Conference call with Tom England regarding potential economic development article on Dover  Attended Chamber of Commerce Board Meeting  Attended Leads Group Meeting and made presentation on economic development issues  Met with Public Works regarding parking for Uzin Utz groundbreaking; also made arrangements to have the area cleared for the groundbreaking  Attended Kent County Tourism Board Meeting  Provided incentive package to Family Dollar  Conference call with Brian Honish regarding Data Center  Discussed LEI requirements with Gerry Buckworth for refinancing Acme  Applied for LEI number and provided it to PNC Bank  Attended Uzin Utz groundbreaking  Met with PNC’s appraiser and provided lease information regarding the Acme building  Reviewed the lease with NCALL attorney for the Inner City Cultural League  Met with Barb DeHaven, DEDO Business Development Manager, regarding New Market Tax Credits  Attended Mike Harrington’s business group and made presentation on economic development initiatives and provided a Downtown Dover Partnership update

Measures:  1 Maintain an unemployment rate for the City of Dover that is lower than national and state averages 2011-2012 Actual 2012-2013 Actual 2013 - 2014 Projected Results <10% unemployment rate in < 10% unemployment rate in <10% unemployment rate in June 2012 June 2013 June 2014 8.2% - US Rate 7.6% - US Rate 7.5 % - US Rate 6.8 % - DE Rate 7.3% - DE Rate 6.8 % - DE Rate 8.6% - City of Dover Rate 9.8% - City of Dover Rate 7.8% - City of Dover Rate June 2012 – Actual June 2013 Actual April 2014 Actual  2 Monitor number of contacts with small businesses and with out-of-town companies interested in locating in Dover 2011-2012 Actual 2012-2013 Actual 2013 - 2014 Projected Results ≥20 contacts with potential >20 contacts with potential >20 contacts with potential small businesses; small businesses; small businesses; 10 contacts YTD 18 Contacts YTD 17 Contacts YTD ≥11 contacts with out-of-town >11 contacts with out-of-town >11 contacts with out-of-town companies interested in companies interested in companies interested in locating in Dover locating in Dover locating in Dover 9 Contacts YTD 7 Contacts YTD 8 Contacts YTD 2014-05 Downtown Dover Partnership  Provided technical assistance to six (6) prospective small business individuals on overall business development within the Downtown Dover Business District  Continued providing technical assistance to five (5) prospective small business individuals on locating available space within the downtown district to lease  Provided twenty-three (23) hours of Technical Assistance to merchants located in the Downtown Business Corridor  Coordinated and implemented logistics (permits, parade registrations, equipment set-up, etc.) for the First Friday Event held on May 2  Coordinated media (newspaper announcements), website and social media press releases of series of Special Events which occurred during May ’13 in downtown Dover  Coordinated ceremony and logistics of Independent Resources Grand Opening on May 1st  Coordinated ceremony and logistics of National Mental Health Month Proclamation in collaboration with The Center for Mental Wellness held on May  Coordinated ceremony and logistics of Shear Dreams Grand Opening on May  Coordinated ceremony and logistics of Celebrity Vintage Clothing Grand Opening on May 2  Disseminated to the downtown merchants and network partners information on the 2014 Health & Employment Fair sponsored by NCALL held on May 10  Attended the Downtown Dover Merchant’s Meeting on May 13

 Attended the Delaware Downtown Quarterly Idea Exchange for Managers on May 6 to discuss the Pop Up Project’ 14  Obtained the State Application Identifier (SAI) from Delaware Intergovernmental Review Process Department to be submitted to the USDA as part of our Rural Business Enterprise Grant submitted for consideration for funding on April 18th  Updated Downtown Dover FY 2015 Events and Activities Calendar  Continued working with Chair of the DDP Organization Committee on the development of the yearly Fund Raising Program  Continued working with the Colonial Rotary Club on obtaining the necessary permits from the City needed to conduct scheduled June 14th Dover Mile and Colonial 5k Races  Continued working with the DDP Merchant Committee on the development of the new Downtown Merchant’s Brochure’ 14  Continued working in collaboration with the Delmarva Black Chamber of Commerce – Capacity Building Committee in the dissemination of the “Small Business Development Survey” to minority merchants in the downtown Dover Business District Phase II  Completed Design Phase of new Parking Lot Directional Banner Project with Parking Committee  Attended and participated as a network partner in the monthly Kent County Open for Business workshop on May 8  Continued working with the Promotion/Marketing – First Friday Sub Committee on the development of new graphic materials for the First Friday events  Continued working with NCALL and the Steering Committee on the logistics and facilitation of the Community Open House Sessions held May 2 -10 for the Restoring Central Dover Project  In collaboration with the City’s GIS Office developed a map identifying all DDP properties located in the Business Improvement District as requested by the City Manager  Continued working with the DDP Merchant’s Committee on the development (Event Insurance Coverage) of the OktDoverFest Event scheduled for October 18  Continued working with the DDP Promotion/Marketing- Farmers’ Market Sub Committee on the development (logistics at Loockerman Way Plaza) of the Farmers’ Market scheduled for June 18

MONTHLY REPORT May 2014

Time Period From 05/01/2013 to 05/31/2014 Alarms by Month of Year Dover Fire Department Month Totals January 134 Febuary 85 March 92 April 77 May 187 June 87 July 93 August 93 September 85 October 101 November 72 December 96 No Date 0 Total Calls 1,202 Date: 07/08/2014 Page: 1

Date Range: From 05/01/2014 to 05/31/2014 Incident Type Report (Summary) Dover Fire Department Count Pct of Total Est Total Est Incident Type Incidents Loss Loss 1 Fire 100 Fire, other 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 111 Building fire 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 113 Cooking fire, confined to container 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 114 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 130 Mobile property (vehicle) fire, other 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 131 Passenger vehicle fire 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 132 Road freight or transport vehicle fire 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 142 Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 154 Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 173 Cultivated trees or nursery stock fire 1 1.12% $0 0.00% Totals 12 13.48% $0 0.00% 2 Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat(no fire) Totals 0 0.00% $0 0.00% 3 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident 311 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 3 3.37% $0 0.00% 320 Emergency medical service incident, other 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 322 Motor vehicle accident with injuries 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 352 Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 353 Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 1 1.12% $0 0.00% Totals 8 8.99% $0 0.00% 4 Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 400 Hazardous condition, other 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 410 Combustible/flammable gas/liquid condition, other 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 412 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 413 Oil or other combustible liquid spill 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 440 Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 3 3.37% $0 0.00% 445 Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 471 Explosive, bomb removal (for bomb scare, use 721) 1 1.12% $0 0.00% Totals 11 12.36% $0 0.00% 5 Service Call 510 Person in distress, other 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 550 Public service assistance, other 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 551 Assist police or other governmental agency 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 553 Public service 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 555 Defective elevator, no occupants 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 571 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 3 3.37% $0 0.00% Totals 11 12.36% $0 0.00% 6 Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, other 8 8.99% $0 0.00% 611 Dispatched & canceled en route 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 631 Authorized controlled burning 4 4.49% $0 0.00% 650 Steam, other gas mistaken for smoke, other 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 671 HazMat release investigation w/no HazMat 1 1.12% $0 0.00% Totals 16 17.98% $0 0.00% Date: 06/17/2014 Page: 1

Date Range: From 05/01/2014 to 05/31/2014 Incident Type Report (Summary) Dover Fire Department Count Pct of Total Est Total Est Incident Type Incidents Loss Loss 7 False Alarm & False Call 700 False alarm or false call, other 13 14.61% $0 0.00% 710 Malicious, mischievous false call, other 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 730 System malfunction, other 6 6.74% $0 0.00% 733 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 740 Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 4 4.49% $0 0.00% 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 745 Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 1 1.12% $0 0.00% Totals 30 33.71% $0 0.00% 8 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster 815 Severe weather or natural disaster standby 1 1.12% $0 0.00% Totals 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 9 Special Incident Type Totals 0 0.00% $0 0.00% Totals 89 $0 Date: 06/17/2014 Page: 2

FY 12-13 City Funded Account Balance Sheet ACCOUNT BUDGET SPENT BALANCE Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance $ 67,000.00 $ 94,597.78 $ (27,597.78) Building Maintenace Supplies $ 1,650.00 $ 213.15 $ 1,436.85 Contractual Services $ 16,587.00 $ 16,587.00 Electricity $ 51,820.00 $ 30,710.56 $ 21,109.44 Gasoline $ 19,050.00 $ 19,044.94 $ 5.06 Heating Expenses- Gas $ 20,000.00 $ 14,292.29 $ 5,707.71 Medical Supplies $ 700.00 $ 118.18 $ 581.82 Office Supplies $ 2,500.00 $ 1,446.66 $ 1,053.34 Other Equipment Repairs $ 4,000.00 $ 1,746.39 $ 2,253.61 Program Expenses $ 36,630.00 $ 36,765.91 $ (135.91) Radio Repairs $ 2,000.00 $ 1,992.73 $ 7.27 Safety & Security $ 2,150.00 $ 582.90 $ 1,567.10 Small Tools $ 4,800.00 $ 5,432.48 $ (632.48) Telephone $ 13,340.00 $ 6,378.17 $ 6,961.83 Training & Travel $ 8,815.00 $ 12,019.68 $ (3,204.68) Uniforms & Firefighting Gear $ 27,100.00 $ 12,011.05 $ 15,088.95 Water/ Sewer $ 3,150.00 $ 2,636.72 $ 513.28 Balance as of: 05/31/14

12:30 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 07/06/14 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail May 2014 Type Date Num Name Memo Split Amount Balance Ordinary Income/Expense Income City Quarterly Deposit Deposit 05/02/2014 0234063 4th quarter deposit City Fund Account 70,325.00 70,325.00 Total City Quarterly Deposit 70,325.00 70,325.00 Total Income 70,325.00 70,325.00 Expense Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance Check 05/11/2014 1089 Atlantic Emergency Solutions Invoice-MOR4346MOP City Fund Account 261.25 261.25 Check 05/11/2014 1089 Atlantic Emergency Solutions Invoice-MOR4307MORA City Fund Account 924.82 1,186.07 Check 05/11/2014 1089 Atlantic Emergency Solutions Invoice-MOR4195MOP City Fund Account 972.04 2,158.11 Check 05/11/2014 1089 Atlantic Emergency Solutions Invoice-MOR4128MOP City Fund Account 1,379.80 3,537.91 Check 05/11/2014 1091 Dover Automotive Invoice- 639577 City Fund Account 368.72 3,906.63 Check 05/11/2014 1091 Dover Automotive Invoice- 641780 City Fund Account 96.53 4,003.16 Check 05/11/2014 1092 Kunkel Auto Supply Invoice- 056443310- Wiper blades City Fund Account 55.80 4,058.96 Check 05/11/2014 1092 Kunkel Auto Supply Invoice- 056443415- Battery City Fund Account 9.54 4,068.50 Check 05/17/2014 1100 Municipal Emergency Services Invoice-00519753_SNV City Fund Account 1,557.40 5,625.90 Check 05/25/2014 1104 Delaware Tire Invoice- 225578- Car 16 tire City Fund Account 232.90 5,858.80 Check 05/25/2014 1105 Kunkel Auto Supply Invoice # 56443310 City Fund Account 27.90 5,886.70 Check 05/25/2014 1105 Kunkel Auto Supply Invoice # 56443415 City Fund Account 4.77 5,891.47 Check 05/25/2014 1105 Kunkel Auto Supply Invoice # 56444501 City Fund Account 20.97 5,912.44 Check 05/25/2014 1105 Kunkel Auto Supply Invoice # 56444604 City Fund Account 122.16 6,034.60 Total Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance 6,034.60 6,034.60 Electricity Check 05/17/2014 1099 City of Dover Utility Acct # 44255-31966 City Fund Account 470.79 470.79 Total Electricity 470.79 470.79 Gasoline Check 05/25/2014 1103 City of Dover April unleaded fuel charges City Fund Account 328.43 328.43 Check 05/25/2014 1103 City of Dover April Bio-Diesel fuel charges City Fund Account 1,092.43 1,420.86 Total Gasoline 1,420.86 1,420.86 Page 1 of 3

12:30 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 07/06/14 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail May 2014 Type Date Num Name Memo Split Amount Balance Heating Expenses- Gas Check 05/11/2014 1090 Chesapeake Utilities Station 2 from 03/26 to 04/25 City Fund Account 160.41 160.41 Check 05/17/2014 1098 Chesapeake Utilities Station 1 from 04/02 to 05/06 City Fund Account 780.11 940.52 Total Heating Expenses- Gas 940.52 940.52 Medical Supplies & Physicals Check 05/11/2014 1094 Southeastern Emergency Equipment Invoice- 523493 City Fund Account 118.18 118.18 Total Medical Supplies & Physicals 118.18 118.18 Office Supplies Check 05/11/2014 1096 Dell Invoice # XJDDX47C8 City Fund Account 69.98 69.98 Check 05/17/2014 1101 Staples Office supplies, toner City Fund Account 102.47 172.45 Check 05/25/2014 1103 City of Dover April postage charges City Fund Account 48.19 220.64 Total Office Supplies 220.64 220.64 Program Expenses Check 05/11/2014 1095 Witmer Public Safety Invoice- 1544267 City Fund Account 609.19 609.19 Total Program Expenses 609.19 609.19 Telephone Check 05/02/2014 1084 Chief Technologies, LLC monthly fees City Fund Account 342.00 342.00 Check 05/02/2014 1087 Verizon Wireless Wireless service from 02/21 to 03/20 City Fund Account 300.20 642.20 Check 05/02/2014 1088 Verizon Wireless Wireless service from 03/21 to 04/20 City Fund Account 300.20 942.40 Check 05/25/2014 1103 City of Dover April Verizon charges City Fund Account 273.47 1,215.87 Check 05/25/2014 1103 City of Dover April Cavalier charges City Fund Account 24.89 1,240.76 Total Telephone 1,240.76 1,240.76 Training & Travel Expenses Check 05/02/2014 1085 Delaware State Fire School Invoice # 14-2571 City Fund Account 425.00 425.00 Check 05/02/2014 1085 Delaware State Fire School Invoice # 14-2656 City Fund Account 25.00 450.00 Check 05/02/2014 1086 Priority Dispatch Corporation Invoice # 98889- EFD Q Certifaction City Fund Account 595.00 1,045.00 Check 05/17/2014 1102 Delaware State Fire School EVO & basic F/F skills City Fund Account 775.00 1,820.00 Page 2 of 3

12:30 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 07/06/14 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail May 2014 Type Date Num Name Memo Split Amount Balance Total Training & Travel Expenses 1,820.00 1,820.00 Uniforms Check 05/11/2014 1093 Municipal Emergency Services Invoice-00516330_SNV City Fund Account 80.00 80.00 Check 05/11/2014 1093 Municipal Emergency Services Invoice- 00516329_SNV City Fund Account 1,466.94 1,546.94 Check 05/25/2014 1106 Southeastern Emergency Equipment Invoice- 526605- F/F gloves City Fund Account 110.54 1,657.48 Total Uniforms 1,657.48 1,657.48 Water/Sewer Check 05/11/2014 1097 Sharp Water Culligan Statement- 141-3441 City Fund Account 189.00 189.00 Check 05/17/2014 1099 City of Dover Utility Acct # 44253-31964 City Fund Account 20.58 209.58 Total Water/Sewer 209.58 209.58 Total Expense 14,742.60 14,742.60 Net Ordinary Income 55,582.40 55,582.40 Net Income 55,582.40 55,582.40 Page 3 of 3

MAY 2014

Dover Police Department Monthly Report To Mayor and City Council “To Protect and Serve” May 2014

DEPARTMENT OF POLICE Paul M. Bernat 400 South Queen Street Chief of Police Dover, Delaware 19904 F.B.I.N.A. 302-736-7111 Fax: 302-672-1842 June 27, 2014 Honorable David L. Bonar, Mayor Members of Dover City Council City Hall Dover, DE 19901 Mayor Bonar and Council Members: The following is the monthly report for Dover Police Department activities for the month of May 2014: COMPLAINTS Total complaints received through May 31st, numbered 13,764. This is a decrease of 736 complaints over the same time period last year. 14,936 14,500 15,000 13,764 14,000 13,234 13,265 13,000 12,000 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS 25 Cases Reported in 20 May 15 Cases Cleared in 12 12 11 9 May 10 6 Cases Cleared 2 from Previous 5 0 1 1 Months 0 Burglary Robbery Rape

Report to Mayor and Council May 2014 Page 3 COMMUNITY POLICING/QUALITY OF LIFE SECTION ENFORCEMENT ACTION Contacts ABANDONED VEHICLES 5 ALCOHOL VIOLATIONS/DUI’S 16 ASSIST OTHER 0 WARRANTS ON FILE 0 BIKE ON SIDEWALK 1 CITY PARK VIOLATIONS 0 CRIMINAL ARRESTS 10 DRUG RELATED ARRESTS 4 LOUD MUSIC 2 MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS 26 PARKING VIOLATIONS 19 PEDDLER 0 MEETINGS 130 PROSTITUTION 0 COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT 14 DCO’S WANTED CHECKS/CPC’S 24 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 18 WARNINGS 4 FUGITIVE 5 TOTAL CONTACTS 278 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 8,684 9,000 The department issued 6,654 traffic citations 8,500 8,000 7,171 7,225 through this reporting period. This is a decrease of 7,500 6,857 6,654 203 citations over the number issued during the 7,000 6,500 same period last year. 6,000 5,500 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TRAFFIC CRASHES Through May 31st, Dover Police investigated 842 1,000 842 900 780 746 802 758 traffic crashes. This is an increase of 84 crashes investigated during the same period last year. 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Report to Mayor and Council May 2014 Page 4 911 CENTER During the month of May, the Dover Police Department handled a total of 10,817 calls 24% averaging 349 calls per day. Dispatchers handled 2,858 calls on the 911 wireless lines, 667 calls on the 911 landlines, and 196 calls on the Voice Over 911 Wireless Internet Protocol lines, the remaining 7,096 were 911 Landline administrative calls. 7% VolP 67% 2% Administrative CITY ORDINANCE SUMMONS 3,822 Through May 31st, we issued 2,837 City 3,900 3,700 3,500 3,189 3,177 ordinance summons, a decrease of 201 3,300 3,038 2,837 summonses over the same period last 3,100 2,736 2,900 2,390 year. *Note: Of those summonses issued 2,700 2,500 2,235 in May, 21 DCO’s were issued for 2,300 1,812 2,003 2,100 handicapped parking violations, 4 for fire 1,900 1,700 lane parking violations, 46 for false 1,500 1,300 alarms (0, for 1-2, 35, for 3-5 alarms, 6, 1,100 900 for 6-9 alarms, 4, for 10-15 alarms, and 700 500 1, for 16 or more alarms) and 8 for noise 300 violations (4 for vehicle violations and 4 100 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 for residence violations). ISSUED PAID Please visit our new website at www.doverpolice.org for up to date information on crimes and activities in the City of Dover. Respectfully Submitted, Paul M. Bernat Chief of Police

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: City Council AGENDA ITEM NO.: 10 DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Tax Assessor DATE SUBMITTED: 7/14/2014 PREPARED BY: City Assessor, Cheryl A. Russell SUBJECT: Revaluation Services for the 2015 Assessment REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT:N/A APPROVALS: City Manager, Controller EXHIBITS: #1) Cost Proposal EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $93,200 AMOUNT BUDGETED: $108,000 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Assessor/Page 263 Acct #110-1300-513.30-31 IMETABLE: Contract will be signed following Council approval. Project to begin immediately; ending by Spring 2015. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends awarding the Proposal for Revaluation Services to Tyler Technologies for the amount of $93,200, plus any additional overage fees. (see Price and Billing Summary – attached) BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The purpose of this City-wide revaluation is to maintain value equity and uniformity of real property values in the City of Dover. This revaluation fulfills our obligation pursuant to Chapter 102, Section 102-1 of the City Code to have a reassessment conducted by an outside mass appraisal company for 2015. Specifically: Sec. 102-1. Valuation and assessment. Section 47 of the Charter provides that an impartial valuation and assessment of all real property within the city may be conducted by the city assessor or assessors. The council may also direct that in lieu of the assessment and valuation by the city assessor, a reassessment and revaluation may be done by the assessor or assessors or an outside mass appraisal company or a consortium of appraisers chosen by the council. Commencing with the year 2010 and every fifth year thereafter, unless otherwise directed, the revaluation and reassessment of all real property may be conducted, under the supervision of the assessor or in conjunction with the assessor, by an outside mass appraisal company or a consortium of appraisers chosen by the council. The mass appraisal company or consortium of appraisers shall be licensed to conduct business in the State of Delaware and the City of Dover and shall employ appraisers who are licensed by the Delaware Division of Professional Regulations. All property shall be valued as to its status; as of its ownership; as of its current market value as of the January 1 assessment date and shall reflect fair market value. A request for Proposal was advertised and sent to nine revaluation companies. Tyler Technologies is the only vendor who has responded to our request. Tyler Technologies has helped conduct City-wide revaluations in the past and the Assessor’s office is currently utilizing software from Tyler Technologies.

The proposal by Tyler Technologies states that they will conduct a City-wide revaluation; wherein they will utilize our existing information. All properties have been visited by City of Dover Staff to reduce the cost of the City-wide revaluation; and all permits are current. Due to this effort, Tyler will not have fieldwork associated with this project; which is reflected in both the price and the duration of the proposed project. The City of Dover will be responsible for all printing and mailings; which is also reflected in the price of the project. Tyler Technologies will conduct informal hearings and five (5) days of support before the City of Dover Board of Assessment Appeals. Additional support beyond the five (5) days will cost additional money. A monthly Status Report will be supplied to the Assessor’s Office from Tyler Technologies, which will be provided to the City Council via the Assessor’s Office Monthly Report, for your review. The original BID was for $125,300, which included their involvement with mailing and printing. After a cost analysis was completed, the cost of printing and mailing the documents ourselves was a cost savings of approximately $17,300. Additional monies were requested in the Assessor budget (110-1300-513.20-23) for the extra printing and mailing costs associated with this project of $14,800.

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-15 WITH SA#1 (Staff Amendments Indicated in Green Text) 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL 2 MET: 3 That Chapter 110 - Utilities, Article III - Water Service, Division 3 - Water Impact Fees, Section 110-207 4 - Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units of the Dover Code be amended by deleting the text indicated 5 in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 6 Sec. 110-207. Establishment of equivalent dwelling units. 7 (a) Determination for residential dwellings. Whenever by ordinance or by contract the city imposes 8 or assesses water charges or fees on the basis of EDUs, an EDU shall be determined in the same 9 manner as wastewater collection charges or fees and as defined in the most recent impact fee 10 ordinance adopted by Kent County Levy Court. An EDU for a residential dwelling shall be 11 determined as follows: 12 (1) Houses, dwellings, mobile homes and apartments with one kitchen and one or more baths 13 and bedrooms separate from the kitchen .....1.0 EDU 14 (2) Efficiency unit or cottage having a living space in one room and having one bath .....1.0 EDU 15 (3) Dwelling with one kitchen and one or more baths and bedrooms separate from the kitchen 16 and attached to other dwellings or structures .....1.0 EDU 17 (b) Determination for nonresidential establishments. Whenever by ordinance or by contract the city 18 imposes or assesses water charges or fees on the basis of EDUs, the number of EDUs to be 19 charged shall be determined in the same manner as wastewater collection charges or fees and 20 using the appropriate specific assessment as defined in the most recent impact fee ordinance 21 adopted by Kent County Levy Court. When users propose water usage under circumstances other 22 than the specific assessments defined by the county, the city's impact fee shall be calculated by 23 the city engineer based on flow in GPD. In such cases where the impact fee is calculated by flow, 24 each EDU shall be equal to 250 GPD. 25 (c) Minimum assignment. A minimum of one EDU will be assigned to each establishment 26 connecting to the system. No fractional parts of EDUs will be assigned. The number of EDUs 27 shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number of EDUs. 28 (d) No assignment. If an establishment does not have any physical facilities which result in a water 29 demand on the city's water system, then the number of EDUs assigned to it shall be zero. 30 (e) Maximum assignment. The city shall in no case charge an impact fee based on more than 100 31 EDUs per certificate of occupancy. For large development projects that have a significant 32 impact on the City and/or the utility, City Council may consider a maximum assignment of 33 EDUs per certificate of occupancy or project. A large development project is any project or 34 connection that will contribute in excess of 100 EDUs. In these cases, City Council may reduce 35 the number of assigned EDUs to as low as 100 EDUs. Any request that will contribute less than

Proposed Ordinance #2014-15 - Chapter 110 - Utilities Page 2 36 100 EDUs cannot be considered a large development project and therefore would not be eligible 37 for consideration of a reduction. For projects that have a significant impact on the City’s 38 Utility, City Council may consider a maximum assignment of EDUs. A project will be 39 considered to have a significant impact if it will contribute in excess of 100 EDUs. In these 40 cases, City Council may reduce the number of assigned EDUs to as low as 100 EDUs if an 41 economic benefit to the City of Dover is demonstrated. Any request that will contribute 42 less than 100 EDUs will not be eligible for a reduction. Maximum assignment of EDUs in 43 excess of 100 EDUs will only apply to projects or connections with building permits issued 44 after July 28, 2014. Any project with a building permit issued prior to July 28, 2014 will 45 be subject to a maximum assignment of no more than 100 EDUs. 46 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED: 47 That Chapter 110 - Utilities, Article IV - Sanitary Sewer Service, Division 3 - Wastewater Collection Impact 48 Fees, Section 110-282 - Establishment of Equivalent Dwelling Units of the Dover Code be amended by 49 deleting the text indicated in red strikeout and inserting the bold, blue text, as follows: 50 Sec. 110-282. Establishment of equivalent dwelling units. 51 (a) Determination for residential dwellings. Whenever by ordinance or by contract the city imposes 52 or assesses wastewater collection and transmission charges or fees on the basis of EDUs, an EDU 53 shall be determined as defined in the most recent impact fee ordinance adopted by the Levy 54 Court of the county. An EDU for a residential dwelling shall be determined as follows: 55 (1) Houses, dwellings, mobile homes and apartments with one kitchen and one or more baths 56 and bedrooms separate from the kitchen .....1.0 EDU 57 (2) Efficiency unit or cottage having a living space in one room and having one bath .....1.0 EDU 58 (3) Dwelling with one kitchen and one or more baths and bedrooms separate from the kitchen 59 and attached to other dwellings or structures .....1.0 EDU 60 (b) Determination for nonresidential establishments. Whenever the city imposes or assesses 61 wastewater collection and transmission charges or fees on the basis of EDUs, the number of 62 EDUs to be charged shall be determined using the appropriate specific assessment as defined in 63 the most recent impact fee ordinance adopted by the Levy Court of the county. When users 64 propose to discharge wastewater under circumstances other than the specific assessments defined 65 by the county, the city's impact fee shall be calculated by the city engineer based on flow in GPD. 66 In such cases where the impact fee is calculated by flow, each EDU shall be equal to 300 GPD. 67 (c) Minimum assignment. A minimum of one EDU will be assigned to each establishment 68 connecting to the system. No fractional parts of EDUs will be assigned. The number of EDUs 69 shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number of EDUs. 70 (d) No assignment. If an establishment does not have any physical facilities which have a load 71 producing an effect on the city's wastewater collection and transmission system, then the number 72 of EDUs assigned to it shall be zero.

Proposed Ordinance #2014-15 - Chapter 110 - Utilities Page 3 73 (e) Maximum assignment. The city shall in no case charge an impact fee based on more than 100 74 EDUs per certificate of occupancy. For large development projects that have a significant 75 impact on the City and/or the utility, City Council may consider a maximum assignment of 76 EDUs per certificate of occupancy or project. A large development project is any project or 77 connection that will contribute in excess of 100 EDUs. In these cases, City Council may reduce 78 the number of assigned EDUs to as low as 100 EDUs. Any request that will contribute less than 79 100 EDUs cannot be considered a large development project and therefore would not be eligible 80 for consideration of a reduction. For projects that have a significant impact on the City’s 81 Utility, City Council may consider a maximum assignment of EDUs. A project will be 82 considered to have a significant impact if it will contribute in excess of 100 EDUs. In these 83 cases, City Council may reduce the number of assigned EDUs to as low as 100 EDUs if an 84 economic benefit to the City of Dover is demonstrated. Any request that will contribute 85 less than 100 EDUs will not be eligible for a reduction. Maximum assignment of EDUs in 86 excess of 100 EDUs will only apply to projects or connections with building permits issued 87 after July 28, 2014. Any project with a building permit issued prior to July 28, 2014 will 88 be subject to a maximum assignment of no more than 100 EDUs. 89 ADOPTED: * 90 S:\ORDINANCES\2014\DRAFT\Ordinance #2014-15 Amending Ch 110-Utilities, Art III-Water Service, Div 3-Water Impact Fees & Art IV-Sanitary Sewer, Div 3-Wastewater Collection Impact Fees-First 91 Reading.wpd 92 SYNOPSIS 93 The proposed amendment would remove the current impact fee cap of 100 EDUs per 94 certificate of occupancy. Developers of projects equal to or in excess of 100 EDU’s that 95 can demonstrate their economic benefit to the City of Dover may request City Council 96 to reduce the number of assigned EDUs to as low as 100 EDUs. This amendment would 97 be applied to projects with building permits issued after July 28, 2014. Projects with 98 building permits issued prior to July 28, 2014 would be subject to the prior cap of 100 99 EDU's. 100 (SPONSORS: BONAR, HUTCHISON, AND KOENIG) 101 Actions History 102 07/14/2014 - Scheduled for First Reading at Council 103 06/23/2014 - Introduced at Utility Committee