This text was pulled from the PDF automatically and may contain mistakes. The PDF is the official record, so check it before relying on this.
Page 1
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
The Council Committee of the Whole Meeting was held on September 27, 2016 at 6:00 p.m., with
Council President Slavin presiding (departed at 7:00 p.m. and returned at 7:03 p.m.). Members of Council
present were Mr. Anderson (arrived at 6:20 p.m.), Mr. Sudler (departed at 7:01 p.m.), Mr. Neil (arrived at
6:15 p.m.), Mr. Cole (arrived at 6:09 p.m.), Mr. Hosfelt, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Lewis and
Mayor Christiansen were absent. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were
Mr. Keller and Mr. Shelton (Safety Advisory and Transportation), and Mr. Shevock and Dr. Stewart
(Legislative, Finance, and Administration).
SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
The Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee met with Councilman Hosfelt presiding.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously
carried.
Request for Four-Way Stop Sign - Wyoming Avenue and Westview Terrace
Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that Second District Councilman William F. Hare
received a petition from area residents interested in the potential installation of a four-way stop
condition at the intersection of Wyoming Avenue and Westview Terrace. The engineering staff in
the Department of Public Works determined that a four-way stop was justified at this location based
on the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). In addition, Mr. Koenig
indicated that there had been consistent speeding complaints on this section of road. Speed
monitoring signs had been installed previously, but the dangerous conditions had persisted. He
stated that staff had no objections to the request and had made preparations for the installation of the
four-way stop at the referenced intersection. Mr. Koenig explained that, after roadside message
boards were placed to alert motorists to the upcoming stop installation, several complaints and/or
concerns were voiced by area residents regarding the planned installation. This item was placed on
the Committee agenda to receive public comment and final direction on the request.
Mr. Koenig informed members that Wyoming Avenue was scheduled for the FY 17 paving program
and would be paved by the end of the fiscal year, noting that bids for the program were scheduled
for consideration by Council during their meeting scheduled for October 10, 2016. He explained that
there is also potential for a change in traffic volumes in this area related to the opening of the West
Dover Connector. Mr. Koenig indicated that although this bypass would not really reduce speeding,
it may reduce the total number of cars traveling through the area, at least in the short term. He stated
that staff’s recommendation was that the four-way stop condition meets the technical merits and, if
public comment is favorable, staff would prepare to install the signs either now or after the paving
project; however, if the testimony indicates that they would like to wait, staff is prepared to wait until
a future date to install the signs.
Page 2
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 2
Staff recommended the installation of a four-way stop condition at the intersection of
Wyoming Avenue and Westview Terrace; however, final action should consider any public
testimony received at the committee meeting.
Referring to the MetroCount Traffic Executive Speed Bin Chart, Mr. Hare stated that approximately
31,000 cars, or a rough average of 3,100 cars per day, traveled Wyoming Avenue in a 10-day period,
according to this police survey. Approximately 19.4% of the traffic was traveling between 35 and
60 miles per hour (m.p.h.). Mr. Hare indicated that Police Chief Paul Bernat had stated that there
was a speeding problem on Wyoming Avenue. Mr. Hare noted that he had been out on a day when
the police were issuing tickets and they had already issued six (6) tickets by 12:30 p.m, when
Mr. Hare had to leave.
Deputy Police Chief Marvin Mailey stated that the speed limit in the area was 25 m.p.h. He
reviewed the MetroCount Traffic Executive Speed Bin Chart, explaining that there were 9,390
vehicles, or 29.8%, at 25 to 30 m.p.h.; 13,433, or 42.7%, at 30 to 35 m.p.h.; 4,776, or 15.2%, from
35 to 40 m.p.h.; and 1,055, or 3.2%, at 40 to 45 m.p.h.
Mr. Hosfelt stated that the majority of vehicles were traveling between 30 and 40 m.p.h.
Deputy Chief Mailey stated that the Police Department had been conducting enforcement in this
area. He noted that traditionally police officers allow 15 m.p.h. over the speed limit in the City of
Dover; however, this area had been a concern over several years, officers had been out there
periodically, and officers had restricted the speed to 10 m.p.h. over the limit and were stopping
vehicles on that basis. Deputy Chief Mailey stated that officers were continuing to see more cars in
the area and stopping more traffic, and they would continue to do so.
Mr. Anthony DePrima, 575 Westwood Drive, stated that he had lived in the Woodbrook
neighborhood for 25 years and had never had a problem getting onto or crossing Wyoming Avenue
due to high speeds or high volume, unless there was a bicycle race going on. He did not deny that
there was speeding in the area, stating that there had been speeding since he moved there, as well as
a law enforcement presence. Mr. DePrima indicated that the speeds and the volumes do not cause
a problem for accessing the street or crossing it. He stated that he opposed a stop sign at Westview
Terrace and Wyoming Avenue, believing that it was an unnecessary inconvenience that would not
work for the goal that was being established. Mr. DePrima explained that he had talked to a number
of his neighbors who indicated that they did not understand the proposal and did not see a problem.
He asked if those neighbors could stand and provide their names and addresses, and the following
individuals did so: Mr. Jeramie Forbes, 524 Westwood Drive; Mr. Don Stein, 522 Woodsedge
Road; Mr. Tom Bursler, 523 Westwood Drive; Mr. Jeff Buttillo, 551 Westwood Drive;
Mr. Jerry Abrams, 1110 Woodsedge Road; Mr. Ralph Taylor, 1017 Westview Terrace; and Mrs.
Marsha Lees; 1014 Westview Terrace. (City Clerk’s Office Note: The petition requesting the
installation of stop signs on the east-west intersection of Wyoming Avenue and Westview Terrace
included the signatures of Mr. Ralph Taylor and Mrs. Marsha Lees.)
Page 3
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 3
Mr. DePrima stated that he had not obtained a petition, although he believed he could have done so
since many people felt the same way that he did. He explained that he travels this road several times
a day and felt that the proposed stop sign would be a nuisance to the approximately 3,000 people
who would have to stop there every day, according to the traffic count cited. In addition,
Mr. DePrima stated that one (1) of his neighbors pointed out that there are times when several cars
stopped at the red light on Governors Avenue are all released when the light turns green. He felt that
when these cars reach the proposed stop sign, they will each have to stop repeatedly as they wait for
the cars in front of them to cross the four-way stop. Mr. DePrima reiterated that a four-way stop
would not help the problem. He had analyzed the traffic study and believed it was flawed because
the eastbound flasher on Wyoming Avenue was not working during the study, he had never seen it
working, and it was still not working. Mr. DePrima believed that these types of flashing signs are
effective and that speeds in the study were a little higher because the flasher was not functioning.
Mr. DePrima stated that, in terms of the volume of traffic, if the number of cars counted were
compressed into an 18-hour period, they would equate to three (3) cars per minute, or one (1) car
passing every 20 seconds on average. He felt that sitting at a stop sign for an average of 20 seconds
would feel like a long time to drivers. Mr. DePrima stated that, when looking at the numbers in the
study, the majority of cars were actually traveling between 25 and 35 m.p.h., and the average speed
was 31 m.p.h.
Mr. DePrima felt that a four-way stop would not be an effective control because stop signs are safety
control rather than speed control devices. He noted that there was not a safety problem at this
location, stating that Chief Bernat had brought up this point with him, and there was not a record of
accidents at this location. Mr. DePrima advised that a stop sign only affects the speeds in front of
the sign as cars are starting to slow, and a car going between 30 and 35 m.p.h. requires between 110
and 140 feet to come to a stop. Outside of this range, there would still be a speeding problem. He
stated that Mr. Hare had advised him that people were having a hard time getting out of their
driveways; however, Mr. DePrima explained that there were only two (2) driveways within 150 feet
of the stop sign, since residents on the north side of the road exit out onto an alley. He also believed
that traffic volumes would decrease once the West Dover Connector opens. Mr. DePrima noted that
cars were traveling from the south of Dover up State Street and Governors Avenue, making a left
turn onto Wyoming Avenue and a right turn onto New Burton Road to go work at Playtex, Dover
High School, or General Foods, and this would definitely change when the Connector is complete.
Mr. DePrima reiterated that a four-way stop was not an effective speed control measure and this was
not a safety issue. As a solution he recommended fixing the eastbound flasher, which had not
worked since he could remember, and bringing back enforcement to the levels that were there before
the flashers were installed. Mr. DePrima stated that his neighbors agreed that enforcement had left
once the flashers were installed, and the motorcycle policemen that had been a standard had gone
away, probably because the business went away. He noted that Chief Bernat had advised him that
he had instructed traffic units to drop the standard for tickets from 15 m.p.h. over the speed limit to
10 m.p.h. over, which Mr. DePrima felt was a good move. He believed that bringing enforcement
back, giving out tickets, and fixing the flasher would result in slower speeds. Mr. DePrima stated
that if there continued to be a problem after the West Dover Connector was finished, measures
should be considered that are designed to slow traffic over the whole length of the road. He
Page 4
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 4
indicated that there are many kinds of traffic calming measures, noting that Council was discussing
one (1) such measure on State Street, and suggested not treating just a 300-foot section of the road
but the whole road if enforcement does not work.
Ms. Laura Hauss, 1155 Yearsley Drive, stated that she travels down Wyoming Avenue at least
10 times per day and she is opposed to the proposed stop sign. She advised that she was not opposed
to stop signs in general, and noted that 30 years ago she had petitioned the City of New York to
upgrade an intersection with poorly placed stop signs to a four-way flasher, although they did not
do this until there was a fatal accident. Ms. Hauss believed that the current situation was the
opposite of the problem in New York City since people would not expect a stop sign in this location,
and there would probably be accidents where there had not been any previously. She stated that
many people start speeding around the corner from New Burton Road and suggested that this would
be a good place to address the problem, rather than in the middle of Wyoming Avenue. Ms. Hauss
indicated that there are several accidents each year on State Street and Wyoming Avenue and she had
never seen any measures to address this situation. She did not think a four-way stop would address
the problem of those having trouble getting out of their driveways because it would produce a line
of cars waiting, noting that the intersection is especially busy in the morning rush hour and this
would make their problem worse.
Ms. Elizabeth Hauss, 1155 Yearsley Drive, stated that she was against the stop sign and agreed with
Mr. DePrima’s comments. She indicated that she had lived there most of her life and is an avid
runner who crosses this intersection twice on her daily runs, but had rarely waited to cross because
the traffic moves so smoothly. Ms. Hauss did not see the benefit of a stop sign because this is a
safety feature, not a speed feature. She felt that the petition with 30 people in support of the measure
was completely irrelevant if it was not determined how many people were against it, and questioned
if everyone in the area had been surveyed to see who was opposed. Ms. Hauss advised that she had
seen much more dangerous intersections throughout Dover that do not get any attention, and
questioned if this was because they were not a special interest. She noted that there had been
numerous fatal pedestrian accidents on State Street and Governors Avenue that had not been
addressed, yet the intersection being discussed somehow warranted taxpayers’ money. Ms. Hauss
believed that the overpass would decrease traffic and eliminate those people who are speeding when
trying to get to work. She stated that she was unsure why action was being taken now, noting that
the problem may go away once the overpass is complete. Ms. Hauss believed that the people who
are speeding were most likely not from the neighborhood, since people have more respect for their
own neighborhoods in most cases. Ms. Hauss stated that she opposed the four-way stop overall, but
would definitely like to see what happens after the overpass is in.
Mrs. Marsha Lees, 1014 Westview Terrace, thanked those who time the lights at Governors Avenue
and State Street, stating that this is a great rotation. She advised that this allows traffic to go through
efficiently late at night and this intersection was one of the best in Dover. Mrs. Lees advised
that she was against the stop sign at Wyoming Avenue and Westview Terrace. She felt that
Wyoming Avenue was as wide as Webb’s Lane, which is a 35 m.p.h. street and, even though it has
a school operating at times, it is a straight and efficient shot between Governors Avenue and
New Burton Road. It was her opinion that the speed limit should be 35 m.p.h. on Wyoming Avenue
and that speed bumps would be more effective for speed control because people are more worried
Page 5
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 5
about their cars than about the issues of time. Mrs. Lees indicated that she had lived in Atlanta and
Denver and had been involved in City matters, traffic, and safety, and the engineers that she spoke
to agreed that stop signs were not for speed control. She also favored waiting until the new
Connector goes in.
Mrs. Debbie Grinstead, 320 Wyoming Avenue, informed members that she and her husband, Alan,
had lived at this location for almost 15 years. She stated that when they first moved there, there were
hardly any children on the street or in the neighborhood; however, there were now numerous
children. Mrs. Grinstead stated that speeding had gotten progressively worse, and she had made calls
about this on numerous occasions. She advised that they now have grandchildren and are very
concerned, noting that it is a beautiful neighborhood with sidewalks, but there is constant
speeding on the road. Mrs. Grinstead stated that those who oppose the stop sign do not live on
Wyoming Avenue. She indicated that she would be more than happy to wait for a car, noting that
she was almost hit today when backing out of her driveway prior to the arrival of a police officer
who was monitoring speed. Mrs. Grinstead stated that she did not care about herself getting hit but
was concerned about the children and safety in the neighborhood. She was grateful that no
children or animals had been hit but questioned if it would have to come to that. Mrs. Grinstead
acknowledged that a stop sign may not stop every occurrence; however, she felt that it would at least
slow traffic down to the point where cars would not start off again and reach 60 m.p.h. before
reaching the next stop between New Burton Road and Governors Avenue. Mrs. Grinstead stated that
members could opt for speed bumps if they chose. She explained that she and her husband observe
speeding constantly while sitting on their porch, especially on weekends when police patrol does not
seem to be as strong and there is drag racing down the street. Mrs. Grinstead suggested putting the
stop sign in and removing it if the bypass takes traffic away, stating that if everyone was worried
about taxpayer money, she would pay for the stop sign. She indicated that she did not want to see
someone’s child hurt because a few people were inconvenienced by stopping for an average time of
20 seconds.
Mr. Richard Cook, 516 Wyoming Avenue, stated that he had seen the traffic and the scofflaws on
Wyoming Avenue increase dramatically. He stated that he did not agree with everything that had
been said about the speed and statistics. Mr. Cook noted that the speed limit was 25 m.p.h., but
those who drive at 30 m.p.h. or less comprised 37.9% of the traffic and approximately 62% were
driving faster than that. He noted that almost 20% drive between the speeds of 35 and 60 m.p.h., and
one (1) out of every five (5) cars on Wyoming Avenue was exceeding the speed limit by at least
10 m.p.h.
Mr. Cook referred to Mr. DePrima’s comment that only two (2) driveways back out onto
Wyoming Avenue near the intersection and informed members that one (1) of those driveways was
his and there were two (2) additional driveways on the other side of Westview Terrace. He stated
that if members wanted to change the speed limit, they should do that; however, if they wanted
public safety, they must find a way to allow people to live on the street and not be concerned about
whether a feral cat or a child chasing a ball into the street would be hit. Mr. Cook stated that a way
must be found to slow traffic down. He advised members that the idea of a stop sign would be to
provide a temporary pause between New Burton Road and Governors Avenue about midway. He
indicated that it would not matter where the sign was, noting that it could be at Westview Terrace
Page 6
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 6
or Sunset Terrace, but Monroe Terrace would be a little too close to Governors Avenue to have
any effect. Mr. Cook indicated that the two (2) electronic speed indicator signs installed on
Wyoming Avenue cost a lot of money and were supposed to warn people of the 25 m.p.h. speed
limit. He agreed that the sign on the west end of Wyoming Avenue had been out of operation for
a while and was unsure why. Mr. Cook believed that the presence of the speed sensor signs was an
admission by the City that there was a problem and stated that something should be tried to alleviate
the problem. He felt that the police presence absolutely works because people see the police and
slow down, noting that some people have applications on their phones that advise where the police
are, which lets them know to slow down. Mr. Cook stated that the problem is with these people who
know they are breaking the law and noted that this is a high-traffic road.
Mr. Cook advised that tonight was the first time that he had heard that there was consideration of
paving the road and believed that making it smoother would exacerbate the problem. He did not feel
it was an inconvenience to stop at a stop sign, noting that stopping while traveling 25 m.p.h. does
not take a lot of time, although traveling at higher speeds would require more braking and more time.
Mr. Cook indicated that there was also a lot of cell phone use. He asked members to seriously
consider this safety issue.
Mr. Ralph Taylor, 1017 Westview Terrace, stated that his neighborhood is fantastic, mature, and
involved, and his neighbors socialize, have block parties, and do things together. He felt that this
was a great place to live and raise kids. Mr. Taylor stated that the neighborhood was in transition
and, since it is an area where young people with children can afford to live, families were coming
in. Since there were more children, he felt it important to be conscious of children and the school
bus situation. Mr. Taylor advised that he lives one (1) house from the corner and traffic moves at
a really good clip, day in and day out. Mr. Taylor believed that the morning school buses were a
legitimate concern and police officers must be there to see exactly what is going on. He stated that
when he was previously serving as motorcycle policeman, he knew that he would not have to wait
long at the corner of Wyoming Avenue and Westview Terrace before issuing tickets because there
were many speeders there, including his neighbors. Mr. Taylor understood that the bypass would
be coming and suggested that a compromise would be to review the study when the bypass is
complete. He felt that the opening of the West Dover Connector was a legitimate point; however,
from an eyewitness point of view, Mr. Taylor believed that the intersection was dangerous and a stop
sign was needed and would be welcomed to slow people down. Mr. Taylor stated that he had
observed a car that left the Oktoberfest last Saturday and traveled at an estimated speed of 65 or
70 m.p.h. down Wyoming Avenue, with a driver that was probably intoxicated. He felt that cars
must be slowed down. He stated that children and families with legitimate concerns must be taken
care of in the interim, and this could be later reviewed and the traffic pattern changed.
Mr. Ray Hebert, 515 Wyoming Avenue, informed members that the speeding in the area is awful.
He explained that he can look out his front window and observe cars going by at 45 or 50 m.p.h.
Mr. Hebert indicated that the police were there earlier in the day and cars were slowing down;
however, as soon as the police leave, speeds increase. He agreed with Mr. Cook that many people
have a phone application that identifies where police are and they slow down so they will not get
caught. Mr. Hebert believed this was a safety issue and estimated that some cars travel 60 or
65 m.p.h. He felt that installing a stop sign would slow people down and did not feel this would be
Page 7
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 7
an inconvenience. Mr. Hebert noted that some of the neighbors who spoke lived on
Westview Terrace, not Wyoming Avenue, so they do not see the traffic going by. He stated that he
had seen school buses traveling down the road at an estimated 40 m.p.h. and screeching to a halt at
Wyoming Avenue and Westview Terrace to let off children. Mr. Hebert indicated that this was a
problem the City was aware of and had addressed before, and police could not be there all of the
time. He believed that a stop sign would work since a stop sign had been placed on South Bradford
Street, where he lived previously, and had slowed traffic.
Responding to Mr. Hosfelt, Mr. Koenig stated that he would look into the eastbound flasher.
Mr. Koenig stated that the West Dover Connector was estimated to be completed in late spring or
early June of 2017, in approximately eight (8) to nine (9) months.
Mr. Slavin advised that this issue was reminiscent of a speed problem experienced on
Spruance Road, a wide road in the Third District, where a stop sign was installed and the speeding
problem continued. He indicated that two (2) measures can be taken to slow speeding: 1) changing
things physically with the road, or 2) make it expensive for people to speed so that recidivism does
not occur. Mr. Slavin informed members that Spruance Road was a wide road where no one parked
on either side because they had parking in front of the houses. The road was striped both down the
center and with parking areas. Mr. Slavin indicated that this changed the entire field of vision for
those coming down the road and caused them to slow down. He wondered if design might address
the situation on Wyoming Avenue, and if there was an opportunity for striping or embedding
reflectors in the road with the repaving contract. In response, Mr. Koenig indicated that this was a
possibility, noting that a similar technique was used on Independence Boulevard by putting a double
yellow line down the center, which provided a visual means of slowing down the traffic. He thought
there was probably enough room on Wyoming Avenue to paint a center line and a white line along
the edge of the parking bay to recognize it as on-street parking. Mr. Koenig stated that a number of
techniques could be used as the paving is being done, noting that he did not expect this to happen
before the end of the calendar year because of the timing of the contract.
Mr. Slavin asked if an alternate to the bid for the striping could be requested from the same company
that does the striping, to obtain an idea of the costs. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that the cost on
Independence Boulevard was just under $5,000 and estimated that this addition to the
Wyoming Avenue project would be approximately in the $4,000 to $5,000 range.
Mr. Slavin requested Deputy Chief Mailey to speak to Chief Bernat about creating special
enforcement districts for speeding within the City so that a ticket would be issued as well as a City
of Dover citation. Mr. Slavin indicated that this was previously discussed in regard to North State
Street and Independence Boulevard and Chief Bernat had stated that he would research this issue.
Mr. Slavin stated that this would place added fines for speeding because there would be a violation
of the City of Dover ordinance as well and would indicate to a speeder that this was a costly error.
Regarding enforcement, Mr. Slavin advised Deputy Chief Mailey that there had been many
comments from residents about enforcement and felt that they needed to see enforcement more
frequently. Mr. Slavin acknowledged that when speed limits are enforced in neighborhoods,
Page 8
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 8
invariably someone who has complained about the speeding receives a ticket for speeding, and he
cautioned those present to be careful.
Mr. Cole moved to table this matter, seconded by Mr. Sudler.
Mr. Hutchison stated that a very serious issue of public safety had been raised, and he felt that an
alternative was needed to address the immediate issue, although maybe not with a stop sign. He
believed that something must be done to address safety concerns due to speeders, noting that the
Police Department could not be expected to be there on a regular basis. Mr. Hutchison did not have
an issue with tabling the matter, but reiterated the need to address safety.
Mr. Cole indicated that he was open to amending the motion. Responding, Mr. Anderson stated that
a motion to table cannot be amended. Mr. Cole stated that he was open to stipulations.
Mr. Hare stated that he was not opposed to tabling this matter because there was a speeding problem
acknowledged by the City and some good suggestions to address it. He stated that he had not heard
any reason not to have the stop sign, other than that it would be a nuisance and an inconvenience,
and had not heard anything from a safety aspect. Mr. Hare questioned whether to wait for accidents
or someone being hit before doing something.
Mr. Sudler asked if the initiator of the motion would be open to a friendly amendment. He stated
that he would like to not only defer this matter but also request that the City Manager, or the
appropriate division, repair the flashing light immediately, as a temporary fix to somewhat address
the issues related to speeding. Mr. Sudler thought that the light could be restored back to where it
was at once, to have something in place, until the City does the study.
Mr. Slavin advised members that there was a motion to table, which is not open for discussion. He
asked the maker of the motion to withdraw the motion entirely.
Mr. Cole withdrew the motion to table the matter.
Mr. Cole moved to defer this matter until the October meeting, when staff will have
recommendations as to some alternatives to meet the safety needs and concerns of the neighborhood.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson.
Mr. Neil apologized for arriving late to the meeting due to being involved in an accident in the
library parking lot. He stated that he was impressed by the number of people who signed the petition
and felt it imperative to do something for those with a legitimate complaint. Mr. Neil noted that
there had been an issue of speeding on North State Street and that speeding was a problem in the
City. He was unsure if some of the devices discussed for North State Street, with the help of the
Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), could be applied here. He noted that there were
a number of devices that could be used to slow traffic that might be examined.
Mr. Keller stated that what had struck him was the issue of children, which he could appreciate as
a grandfather. Acknowledging that it would not take much time to defer this matter, he felt that the
Page 9
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 9
sooner action was taken the better. Mr. Keller stated that he had gone out to the area and talked to
some of the people. He noted that there were already sign poles in place and asked how long it
would take to put up a couple of signs. Mr. Keller stated that he was ready to have signs put up right
now and did not believe members should table this matter.
Mr. Hutchison stated that a new traffic device now in place on northbound North State Street had
not been there very long and was very impressive. He explained that when approached, the device
lights up and, if the driver is over the speed limit, it flashes and does a good job in slowing people
down. Mr. Hutchison indicated that those kinds of devices should be considered.
Mr. Hare stated that he had seen devices in Virginia that flash when a driver is over the speed limit
and take a picture. He asked if this was possible in Dover. Responding, Mr. Koenig advised that
this technology existed but was not yet authorized at the State level. He indicated that the State
legislature had denied this technology in 2010 or 2011.
Mr. DePrima noted that the study was flawed because the flasher was not working and requested that
Council fix the flasher and redo the counts. Responding, Mr. Hare stated that the flasher did not
have anything to do with the study, noting that two (2) cords were put across the street and the
flashers did not count cars. Mr. DePrima stated his point was that the flashers work to slow traffic.
He advised that everyone had acknowledged that it is helpful to have the flasher in place; however,
for the entire study, the flasher was not working, so people were not getting the message to slow
down. Mr. DePrima suggested fixing the flasher and running the study again, so that it would not
be flawed.
Ms. Elizabeth Hauss questioned if a stop sign had ever been taken down. Noting that it had been
mentioned that there were people drag racing, she stated that drag racers do not care about stop signs
and would run through them, hurting someone at the stop sign who was casually looking right or left
and not down the road at the speeder. She felt that if there was no four-way stop, drivers would be
looking further down the road to see these potentially hazardous people. Ms. Hauss believed that
putting up a stop sign would cause more accidents. She questioned how many accidents would have
to occur for the City to remove the stop sign. Referring to the petition, Ms. Hauss stated that she
could find 30 people to sign a petition saying that a unicorn should be President; however, this was
irrelevant if it was not shown how many people were opposed, and that had not been done. She felt
that it would be a different matter if the entire area was surveyed and the majority of the people in
the neighborhood wanted the four-way stop.
Mr. Hosfelt stated that there was a motion on the floor to defer this matter for one (1) month to
gather more information from staff and the Police Department. He assumed that the Police
Department could conduct a study with properly working flashers on both ends of Wyoming Avenue
within a month, and more information could be gathered to make a better decision. Mr. Hosfelt
noted that the there was a similar situation on Independence Boulevard in the First District, and
striping had significantly reduced the speed. He advised that Independence Boulevard is similar to
Wyoming Avenue because it is a cut-through or shortcut, and residents of that road seemed very
happy with the results. Mr. Hosfelt noted that additional speed calming measures would be taken
in that area.
Page 10
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 10
In response to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Hosfelt stated that the original motion was to defer the whole matter
for one (1) month to obtain further information.
Mr. Anderson stated that repairing the flasher was part of the motion to defer. Responding,
Mr. Hosfelt stated that that was normal, routine maintenance which Mr. Koenig had already agreed
to do. Mr. Hosfelt indicated that the motion on the floor was to defer this matter for one (1) month
and gather more information from staff, and this motion had been seconded.
As a point of order, Mr. Sudler stated that he did not think that the motion was read according to his
understanding that the flashing lights were to be fixed as a directive from the Committee to
Mr. Koenig. He stated that he knew that Mr. Koenig said that he would do that; however, he did not
think it was added in the motion. Mr. Sudler asked if this was part of the initial motion, and
requested that the motion be read for the record.
At the request of Mr. Sudler, Chairman Hosfelt requested Mr. Cole to restate his motion for
clarification. Responding, Mr. Cole stated that the motion was to defer the whole matter for one (1)
month pending the completion of the flashing lights to better collect the information for the speed
determination. Mr. Anderson confirmed that he seconded the motion.
The motion to defer the whole matter for one (1) month pending the completion of the flashing
lights to better collect the information for the speed determination carried, with Mr. Keller
voting no.
Mr. Slavin thanked the community for coming out, stating that he was pleased to see people
interested in safety in their neighborhood and expressed confidence that a solution would be reached
together, whether through a stop sign, striping, enforcement, or all of these strategies. He urged
those present not to let themselves be divided by whether or not a stop sign is installed, stating that
what was important was that the community was united in their desire for a safer community.
Mr. Slavin assured them that Council was willing to take measures to achieve this.
Mr. Hutchison moved for adjournment of the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee
meeting, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried.
Meeting adjourned at 6:58 p.m.
LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting was held with Chairman Hare
presiding.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Mr. Anderson moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Hosfelt and unanimously
carried.
Page 11
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 11
Annual Review of Investment Policy
Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, advised that an annual review of the City of Dover
Investment Policy Statement had just been completed. She stated that staff reviewed changes
recommended by Public Financial Management, Inc. (PFM), the City’s investment advisory firm,
and some of PFM’s recommendations were incorporated into the policy amendments. Mrs. Mitchell
indicated that many of the proposed amendments were administrative, such as changes in the names
of rating agencies. She stated that a more significant change was the lowering of credit ratings from
AA to A to enhance returns and provide more investment choices. In addition, referring to
Section 8.8 of the Policy, Asset Backed Securities, Mrs. Mitchell explained that PFM recommended
the addition of these securities, which include auto-loan receivables, credit card receivables, home
equity loans, and manufactured housing loans. She indicated that she initially had some hesitation
about including investments that include these types of notes; however, she reviewed the State’s
investment policy and found that this would mirror their policy. Mrs. Mitchell stated that she was
comfortable adding these securities to the portfolio, as a single issuer was only a small portion of the
City’s portfolio and could not exceed 5%.
Staff recommended approval of the proposed changes to the Investment Policy Statement.
Mr. Hutchison moved to recommend approval of the proposed changes to the Investment
Policy Statement, as recommended by staff, seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously
carried.
Discussion of Duties and Assignments of City Personnel
During the Council Committee of the Whole/Legislative, Finance, and Administration meeting of
July 26, 2016, members discussed the Duties and Assignments of City Personnel and deferred this
matter until members had all the information they needed. During their meeting of August 23, 2016,
the Committee deferred this item until September 27, 2016.
Mr. Slavin reminded members that this agenda item stemmed from discussions during the 2016
Budget Review. It was his belief that members wanted to discuss the Planning and Inspections
Department/Parks and Recreation Department cluster. Noting that Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend,
Director of Planning and Community Development was not present, Mr. Slavin suggested that it
might be best to defer this discussion.
Mr. Anderson noted that Mr. Sudler was not present either because he had to leave for an
appointment.
Mr. Anderson moved to defer this matter until the next Council Committee of the
Whole/Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried.
Designing and Expanding Recruitment for City Committees, Commissions, and Boards
During the Council Committee of the Whole/Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee
meeting of August 23, 2016, members considered Designing and Expanding Recruitment for City
Committees, Commissions, and Boards. Members deferred this matter until September 27, 2016 to
Page 12
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 12
allow the ideas to be solidified, Mr. Lewis and Mr. Anderson to review and refine it further, and for
Mrs. Sass and the City Clerk’s Office to work together.
Mrs. Kay Sass, Public Affairs and Emergency Management Coordinator, stated that she had
reviewed the information pertaining to committees, commissions, and boards with the City Clerk’s
Office. She noted that at the previous meeting, she had suggested that social media postings of
vacancies could be distributed through five (5) or six (6) postings starting at 10 to 12 weeks prior
to applications being due, with repostings at six (6) to eight (8) weeks, two (2) to four (4) weeks,
three (3) to five (5) days, and on the final date of the acceptance of applications. Mrs. Sass explained
that she and the City Clerk are the individuals who are authorized to post on social media for the City
and could cover this responsibility. She stated that they also believed that a link could be placed on
the main page of the City website showing the listing of available committees, the openings, and the
application. Mrs. Sass expressed her hope that each member had an opportunity to review the
application that was proposed at the previous meeting, which she felt was a big improvement from
the current application. She noted that it was much more thorough and requested information from
applicants that should result in a diverse selection of individuals from across the City. Mrs. Sass
explained that, when creating the application, Mrs. Traci McDowell, City Clerk, compared different
applications, including those from Newark and the State of Delaware, and the best portions were
incorporated in the proposed City application. It was Mrs. Sass’s opinion that there were benefits
to having laymen on committees, noting that some people approach matters by considering their
financial impact, some by the time management impact, and others by the impact on the community
as a whole. She expressed her hope that members would be open to not limiting an applicant
because they did not believe that they were a subject matter expert. Mrs. Sass felt that everyone
could offer something and felt it important to keep an open mind, noting that there are subject matter
experts on staff that could help to clarify matters. She encouraged all individuals to apply and
personally felt that committees should not be limited but should reflect the community as a whole.
Mr. Hutchison expressed his compliments regarding the proposed application and questioned how
long applications remain on file after submission. Responding, Mrs. McDowell stated that
applications are kept forever.
Dr. Stewart noted that she had not been present when this was previously discussed and asked
whether the goal was to obtain more applicants, more qualified applicants, or more diverse
applicants. Responding, Mr. Anderson stated his belief that the City was not hearing from enough
people and indicated that he had been approached by people who wanted to be involved in the City
but were unsure how to do so, what positions were available, or were hearing about openings too
late. He explained that he wanted to make the process simple so that individuals could go to one (1)
place to see openings and how to apply. Mr. Anderson stated that the goal for the application was
to provide useful information for members to review. He indicated that applications are currently
not distributed unless requested. Mr. Anderson noted that if someone applies and is not chosen for
a committee, their application would provide useful information that would allow them to be
considered for different opportunities. He expressed the desire to get more people involved and to
provide a pool of individuals that can be contacted to fill other vacancies. Mr. Anderson noted that
it would also be helpful to be able to provide an explanation when asked about why someone was
chosen and to be able to state, for example, that they had some background or interest, or that they
Page 13
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 13
were the only applicant. He stated that there are vacancies that have existed for years as a result of
the current process, and he felt this illustrated that information was not getting distributed since there
are frequently people who state they want to serve.
Mr. Neil stated his belief that people do not realize that they have an opportunity to serve and
volunteer their time, and that opening up the pool for committees would give them an opportunity
to become involved in government. He noted that Councilman Lewis was not present this evening
but had previously suggested requiring training through the Delaware League of Local Governments
(DLLG). Mr. Neil stated that it was difficult to find people who are interested enough in the City
to volunteer their time and effort. He felt that they should not be discouraged by imposing
requirements, which would close more doors than it would open. Mr. Neil suggested bringing
individuals in, letting them experience what is here, and allowing them to go to staff and Council
to understand aspects of government. He felt that staff had done a marvelous job in heading up this
effort and providing a form to allow for a greater pool of people.
Mrs. Sass clarified that information had always been available on the website for all of the openings
that had existed and that it was not a matter of this not being there for the public. She stated that
sometimes it is a matter of people not being interested, and suggested that perhaps another way must
be found.
Mr. Anderson disagreed, stating that he was aware of existing vacancies that were not reflected on
the website. Responding, Mrs. Sass stated that the City had just converted to a new website and the
priority was to make sure that meeting minutes and agendas required by law were posted. She
noted that there would be several weeks of correcting errors found throughout the entire site.
Mr. Anderson stated that he had looked at the website earlier in the day and all the vacancies were
not listed. For example, he noted that the listing for the Dover Human Relations Commission
(DHRC) was not current and that Mr. Kenneth Roach was still listed as the Fourth District
Representative, although this position was vacant. Mr. Anderson noted that another committee
listing was not current, although he could not recall what it was.
Mr. Hare stated that there were vacancies on the DHRC in the First and Fourth Districts and noted
that it was incumbent on Council members to encourage people to get involved and make
recommendations for committees. He asked if Mr. Anderson had made recommendations for the
Fourth District. Responding, Mr. Anderson stated that he had not made a recommendation yet;
however, he had reached out to people who were considering applying.
Mr. Hare stated that a vacancy on the Compensation Commission was about to be filled. He
expressed his belief that requiring committee members to be trained through the DLLG might be
counterproductive, noting that these were not high-paid positions but volunteer opportunities, and
putting restrictions on them might discourage applicants. Mr. Hare agreed with the application
process and having vacancies listed.
Mrs. Sass advised that staff would be happy to start promoting openings if Council was ready and
wanted staff to do so.
Page 14
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 14
Mr. Slavin stated that the reason for the discussion was to develop a wide expanse of diverse
candidates with deep, varied backgrounds. He indicated that better information was also needed to
vet candidates. Mr. Slavin stated that Councilman Lewis had raised this issue. As someone with
responsibility of making many of these appointments, Mr. Slavin stated that he had not been calling
members to tell them that there were vacancies and request names, noting that the process was not
as simple as just thinking about who would do well in a position. He explained that he had run into
roadblocks, noting that in some cases individuals were already serving on other boards or
commissions at the State or County level. In addition, Mr. Slavin noted that an individual’s
appointment must be vetted by their employer to make sure there are no conflicts of interest, and they
must go through the City’s Clean Hands Ordinance. He stated that some boards require residence
by district, and some do not. Mr. Slavin advised that it is not a simple process of penciling in names
on rosters and obtaining appointees. He indicated that some are volunteer positions and others offer
a meager amount of pay, and that people work a lot these days, often working varied hours, leaving
those who work Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. few and far between.
Mr. Slavin stated that Council would continue to work at this.
In regard to training, Mr. Slavin felt there should be an onboarding process for new appointees to
any committee, commission, or assignment, similar to the process that a full-time or part-time
employee goes through. He asked that the City Clerk’s Office or the Human Resources Director
look at this process and provide members with an overview of what that process involves.
Mr. Slavin stated that he was not convinced that sending these individuals to another organization
for training would fit the City’s needs, noting that he was unsure what training Mr. Lewis was
proposing that they be sent to. Mr. Slavin believed that useful information would include how
meetings are run, how to access information on the City’s website, who appointees can call within
the City, and what resources are available to them. He noted that a huge portion of the training
would be related to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) laws so that people would be grounded
when they walk in the door.
Mr. Hare recalled that, in the 1990s, one-hour workshops were held for newly-appointed committee
members, and explanations were provided about FOIA rules, etc. He agreed with this approach,
rather than sending members elsewhere for training.
Mr. Slavin stated that it may be cheaper to bring a resource in to train all appointees in one (1) place,
rather than sending them elsewhere.
Referring to page 4 of the proposed application, Mr. Shevock questioned why it would be desired
to have applicants indicate if they or a relative have a disability, and to describe their disability,
gender, and ethnicity. He noted that providing this information was optional; however, he
questioned what it had to do with working on a committee. Responding, Mrs. Sass indicated that
it would be up to members’ discretion whether this should be included; however, she advised that
this was included to make sure that the committees, commissions, and boards represent a true
snapshot of the Dover community. She explained the desire to ensure that minorities include various
groups such as African-Americans, women, and Indians. Mrs. McDowell stated her belief that these
questions came from the State and probably dealt with obtaining someone with the experience
needed for a particular committee. She noted that, in creating the new application, there was a lot
Page 15
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 15
of discussion about diversity and the makeup of committees. Mrs. McDowell noted that staff could
not say what the races or nationalities of current members were because they never ask. Mr. Slavin
explained that these questions reflect standard information gathering required by Equal Employment
Opportunity (EEO) practices. He stated that this information is optional, but the City would try to
capture it to show that its recruitment process is fair.
Mr. Neil suggested including a statement that the City does not discriminate under any circumstances
in regard to ethnicity, gender or disability. He also expressed the importance of making sure that the
disabled can get into the City’s facility. Mr. Neil noted that there could be difficulty because it is
not very convenient for someone in a wheelchair to come into the Council Chambers to serve on a
committee, and allowances may have to be made.
Mr. Anderson felt it was a good suggestion to add that the City provides equal opportunity and does
not discriminate on any lawful basis.
Mr. Slavin indicated that the discussion had pivoted and was now addressing EEO policies. He
advised that he, Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, and Mrs. Kim Hawkins, Human Resources
Director, had discussed this approximately two (2) weeks ago. Mr. Slavin stated that had noticed
that when he clicked on the EEO policy statement on the old City website, it indicated that it was
“under construction,” and he was unsure what had caused this. He informed members that he had
asked Mrs. Hawkins to prepare a full briefing on what the City’s policy is, what its goals are, where
the City is vis-a-vis those goals, and what strategies are in place with recruitment and hiring.
Mr. Slavin indicated that he believed that some of his questions had been shared with members of
Council. He stated that this matter was scheduled for consideration during the Council Committee
of the Whole/Legislative Finance, and Administration Committee’s second meeting in October.
Mr. Slavin expressed his opinion that the EEO statement should go on everything that the City has,
not just hiring-related information.
Mr. Anderson agreed with Mr. Slavin and stated his hope that members would review the report
prepared by Dr. Bobby Jones related to recruitment that Council passed and enacted, which he felt
had fallen a little by the wayside. (City Clerk’s Office Note: During their Regular meeting of
February 13, 2012, Council accepted the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee’s
recommendation that the Minority Recruitment Committee (MRC) Report (Attachment #1) be
referred to staff for a report back to the Committee within 60 days. During their Annual meeting
of May 14, 2012, Council accepted the Implementation Plan for the Minority Recruitment Committee
Recommendations (Attachment #2), as recommended by the Legislative, Finance, and
Administration Committee.)
Mr. Anderson moved to recommend acceptance of staff’s recommendation, seconded by
Mr. Neil and unanimously carried.
Members were provided “Proposed Recommendations for Advancing a more effective Recruitment
Process for City Commissions, Committees and Boards” (Attachment #3), as submitted by
Councilman Lewis. Referring to this document, Mr. Anderson noted that most of the five (5)
recommendations it included had been implemented.
Page 16
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 16
Mr. Anderson moved to recommend that the five (5) points submitted by Councilman Lewis be
adopted, with division of the question between point #4 and point #5, and that point #5 be voted
upon separately. The motion was seconded by Mr. Slavin.
At the request of Mr. Anderson, Mrs. McDowell read “Proposed Recommendations for Advancing
a more effective Recruitment Process for City Commissions, Committees and Boards” into the
record.
Referring to the recommendation regarding advertising and publishing vacancies, Mrs. Sass advised
members that she had absolutely no problem doing the social media and website postings; however,
she explained that she did not have an advertising budget and suggested that this recommendation
be rephrased. Responding, Mr. Anderson stated that it would be up to members to come up with the
money to advertise and it was not for Mrs. Sass to be concerned with. He noted that the
recommendation was to “advertise/publish” and did not mandate advertising; therefore, a press
release could be issued and would have no cost.
Responding to Mr. Neil, Mr. Anderson stated that advertising would not necessarily mean paid
advertising.
The motion to recommend adoption of “Proposed Recommendations for Advancing a more
effective Recruitment Process for City Commissions, Committees and Boards” points #1 - #4
carried with Mr. Shevock voting no.
Mr. Slavin moved to defer consideration of “Proposed Recommendations for Advancing a
more effective Recruitment Process for City Commissions, Committees and Boards” point #5,
related to the requirement of training for board, committee, and commission appointees, until
the next meeting of the Council Committee of the Whole/Legislative, Finance, and
Administration Committee, and to recommend that the City Clerk’s Office and the Human
Resources Director come back with an explanation of the onboarding process for new
appointees. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cole and unanimously carried.
Mr. Hare questioned if this would relate to members of committees, commissions, and boards
attending DLLG training. Responding, Mr. Slavin stated that this question would be deferred until
members determine what can be taught in-house.
Mr. Cole moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee
meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried.
Meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m.
By unanimous consent, the Council Committee of the Whole meeting adjourned.
Page 17
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PAGE 17
Meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m.
Timothy A. Slavin
Council President
TAS/TM/js/dd
S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Committee-Minutes\2016\09-27-2016 CCW.wpd
Attachments
Attachment #1 - Minority Recruitment Committee (MRC) Report
Attachment #2 - Implementation Plan for the Minority Recruitment Committee Recommendations
Attachment #3 - “Proposed Recommendations for Advancing a more effective Recruitment Process for City
Commissions, Committees and Boards”, submitted by Councilman Lewis
Page 18
ATTACHMENT #1
Council Committee of the Whole Meeting of 09/27/2016
September 29,2011
Dr. William McGlumphy, Chair
Legislative and Finance Committee
Dover City Council
Dover, Delaware
viYir. Scott Koenig
Acting Manager
City of Dover
Dover, Delaware
Gentlemen:
The Minority Recruitment Committee (MRC) was commissioned by Mr. Anthony
DePrima, former City Manager to develop recommendations to improve minority hiring
with the City. The first meeting of the Committee was held on February 17, 2011. Mr.
DePrima provided the MRC with a working document that included recommendations
brought forward earlier by a Minority Recruiting Focus Group. (Exhibit A).
The attached report reflects the result of deliberations and recommendations, addressing
the outlined purpose of the Committee. While Priority # 1 (Current Employee Morale) is
not directly related to recruitment, members of the committee felt strongly that it was
germane to the issue and must be addressed before they were willing to move forward.
The Minority Recruitment Committee completed its work August 23, 2011. Sincere
thanks are extended to Ms. Kim Hawkins for speaking with the group and providing
information about employment with the City. Recommendations, addressing four (4)
major areas are hereby submitted on behalf of the Minority Recruitment Committee.
Sincerely,
Bobby C. Jones,
Chair, Minority Recruiting Committee
Member, Legislative and Finance Committee
Page 19
September 29,2011
MINORITY RECRUITING COMMITTEE
Priority # 1: Employee Morale
Rationale: The prevailing low moral among employees should be addressed before new
employees are actively recruited.
Recommendations:
1. Implement mandatory structured training for all employees, including supervisors,
managers, others who supervise members of the Bargaining Units. Suggested
training topics are Effective Communication Skills, Harassment Prevention
(verbal, sexual, etc.), Diversity and Employee Evaluations.
2. Implement a published document outlining procedures for hearing non-bargaining
employee grievances.
3. Develop consistent training materials for all employees. Outside training
materials should be considered and adapted to the City's needs.
4. Implement an on-going program of activities/communications for all employees to
facilitate a sense of pride and satisfaction. For example, holiday city-wide events,
in-house newsletter, focusing on staff and their accomplishments. Such activities
are very low cost or no cost.
Priority #2: Upward Mobility/ Career Ladder
Rationale: The percentage of minorities employed by the City does not mirror either
the percentage of city employees or the minority population in thG. City. (Exhibit B,
Paragraph 1 provided by K. Burns and Exhibit C, provided by K. Hawkins).
1. Implement a "Mentoring" Program to identifY employees who may wish to move
up the career ladder within the City.
2. Guidelines relative to goals and eligibility should be developed and made
available to all employees, via website, newsletter, bulletin boards, handbooks,
etc.
3. Develop strategies to recruit minorities for professional positions.
Page 20
Page2
September 29, 2011
Minority Recruitment Final Report
Priority# 3 Enhanced Technology for City Image and Recruitment
Rationale: To attract quality prospective employees, the city's website must be enhanced
provide information that is inviting and clearly addresses such topics as Recruitment,
Employee Benefits, Commitment to Diversity, and Departmental Goals/ Responsibilities.
Recommendations:
1. The City's website should be enhanced to convey pertinent information that may
be of interest to a prospective employee.
2. The City should have links that will give specific information about the
Departments.
3. There should be a standard format for information representing departments.
Priority #4: Internship for high school and college students.
Rationale: Provide a well-defined one or two day experience for students who may be
thinking of a career in municipal government. A special effort would be made to recruit
minority students, including Blacks, Hispanics, and women. Criteria for participation
would be jointly developed by the schools and the City.
Page 21
Minority Recruiting Comrnittee
*DRAFT*
Purpose: The purpose of a Minority Recruiting Committee is to 1) implement several
recommendations that were brought up during the session held with minority
and female employees, 2) attend community events to promote commitment to
fair hiring 3) develop new ideas to improve minority hiring that may arise from
the group. The list below is the recommendati,ons brought forward that the
initial Minority Recruiting Focus Group:
~ Develop a mentorship/internship program for students and unemployed
persons. Suggested names would be "First Step Program" or "City
Academy''.
~ Visit local graduating classes to discuss employment opportunities and
:-·,
prepare students for employment after high school and college. /If JWas
'.:.-·
expressed that, not only management, but also all levels of employees
should go to the schools to talk with students and answer their questions.
~ An employee expressed that minorities are not applying due to the
perception in the community that the City of Dover does not hire minorities.
Improve our image through community events and involvement.
~ Develop a City organized Youth Government Day.
~ Develop a cover to the City of Dover application with images of actual
employees at work, as well as, introductory material on jobs highlights,
benefits offered, etc.
;;.. Slideshow on the City of Dover website of employees at work.
? Develop a video advertisement with image of employees at work.
Volunteers: The following employees have volunteered to participate on the Committee
and/or to help with the cover of the City application:
•!• Denise Roberson has been with the City for 20 years and currently works as
an Account Clerk Ill in the Customer Service Dept -and Library Clerk I in the
Library {part time).
•!• Kelli Burns has been with the City of Dover Police Department for 17 years
and currently hold the rank of Police Mast~,r Comoral. She is responsible for
recruiting at Dover Police Department.
•!• Francis Stevens has been with the City of Dover for 3 years and currently
works as a Motor Equipment Operator I within the Sanitation Department of
Public Services. He ..on~viously worked in the Water and Electric
Departments.
•!• Kerry Walker has been with the City of Dover for 2 years and currently works
as a Motor Equipmen-r0oer;!'t:Or I within the Grounds Department of Public
Services.
Page 22
Minority Recruiting Committee
*DRAFT*
•!• Ron Cotton has been with the City of Dover for 19 years and currently works
as a lineman 1st Class II within the Transmission and Distribution Department
of Public Utilities.
•!• Sharon Duca has been with the City of Dover for 7 years and currently works
as Water I Wastewater Manager within Public Utilities.
•!• Pattee Luppino has been with the City of Dover for 8 yP.ar:-s- <tnd currently
works as Administrative Assistant for Public Utilities.
•!• Tracey Harvey has been with the City of Dover for 10 years and currently
works as Community Development Ma.nag~r _within the Planning and
Inspections Department.
•!• Alicia Rabenold-Connelly has been with the City of Dover for 6 years and
currently works as a Motor Equipment Operator II within the Grounds
Department of Public Services.
•!• Kristen Couden has been with the City of Dover for 2 years and currently
works as a Custodian I within the Facilities Maintenance Department of
Central Services. She performs her duties at the Dover Police Department.
•:• Curtis Scott has been with the City of Dover for 21 years and currently works
as a Lineman 1st Class II withil'l _tl,e Transmission and Distribution Department
of Public Utilities.
Page 23
Burns Kelli (Dover PO)
I= rom: Utami Lisna (DEDO) [Lisna.Utami@state.de.us]
mt: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:55PM
-•o: Burns Kelli (Dover PD)
Cc: Saleem lshaq M.; Bach Stephen
Subject: RE: Dover
Kelli:
!~ere is the information that you requested. The U.S. Census Bureau (Census 2010) provides the following information
for Dover City. More detailed demographics subjects, such as gender and age group, which are necessary for the
purpose of your report are not available.
POPULATION
Total population 36,047 100
RACE
White 16,443 45.6
Black or African American 14,798 41.1
Others of One Race 1240 3.4
Two or More Races 1,204 3.3
Hispanic or Latino (of any race)
;
2,362 6.6
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census.
1.include the following estimate using DemographicsNow~~t, which provides detailed demographic statistics for the City of
Dover. The most current data is Spring 2010.
Dover City Demographics. Spring 2010 Estimate
Population, Total 37,251
Age Group
Age 20-34
Percent to total = 23.6%
Population = 8,791
Gender
% Male population= 46.60%
o/o Female population = 53.40%
1
Page 24
I:_ . ~
~--Z
I
\ ~ :_ · 1
Ethnicity of City of Dover Employees
March 2011
Ethnicity Number of City of Dover Employees
Asian/Pacific Islander 3
Hispanic 5
Alaskan/American Indian 10
Black 43
White 314
Total Number of Employees 375
My Docs/Council Requests/Ethnicity Summary
Page 25
ATTACHMENT #2
Council Committee of the Whole Meeting of 09/27/2016
City Manager’s Implementation Plan for the Minority Recruitment Committee Recommendations
The Minority Recruitment Committee held a series of meetings during 2011 and concluded their work in August
2011. From the meetings held by this Committee, a series of recommendations were put forward, which were
shared with the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee in January 2012. The Committee referred
the recommendations back to the City Manager for development of a plan to implement the recommendations.
This action plan includes a tentative timeline and strategy for addressing the recommendations of the Minority
Recruitment Committee.
To ensure that the action plan measures are completed in accordance within the specified tentative timelines, a
steering committee will be developed by the City Manager to include the Human Resources Director and various
staff members representing multiple City departments. This steering committee will meet quarterly or as
needed to ensure the actions are implemented.
Priority #1: Employee Morale
The Minority Recruitment Committee asserted that the low morale among City employees should be addressed
prior to actively recruiting new employees. The employee morale is largely tied to the City’s budget issues and
the overall stress under which the City organization functions. Four (4) recommendations were put forward by
the Minority Recruitment Committee to help address employee morale.
1. Implement mandatory structured training for all employees, including supervisors, managers, others
who supervise members of the Bargaining Units. Suggested training topics are Effective Communication
Skills, Harassment Prevention (verbal, sexual, etc.), Diversity and Employee Evaluations.
Implementation Plan: The City holds mandatory harassment and diversity training for employees.
Under the recommendation, this program should be expanded. One of the concerns associated with the
current training provided is that it involves a trainer “talking at” staff. An internal training committee
will be developed by the City Manager to include the Human Resources Department and key staff from
other departments to develop a training program that is more interactive and covers the variety of
topics that will help employees build their skills to thrive in the work place.
Timeline: This committee will be appointed by the City Manager in July 2012, and will be tasked with
developing an interactive training program to provide quarterly training for all employees beginning in
the fall of Fiscal Year 2013.
2. Implement a published document outlining procedures for hearing non-bargaining employee
grievances.
Implementation Plan: A grievance procedure is outlined in the Employee Handbook beginning on page
61. The procedure covers all employees and also indicates that the entire grievance procedure is
1
Page 26
subject to employee labor agreements, when applicable. Changes to the City’s Employee Handbook are
currently being developed by the Human Resources Director in draft form. Changes to this section can
be considered with the review of the entire document.
Timeline: Changes to the Employee Handbook will be presented to the Legislative, Finance, and
Administration Committee on or about July 2012.
3. Develop consistent training materials for all employees. Outside training materials should be considered
and adapted to the City’s needs.
Implementation Plan: This will be implemented along with the training program discussed in
recommendation #1.
4. Implement an on-going program of activities/communications for all employees to facilitate a sense of
pride and satisfaction. For example, holiday city-wide events, in-house newsletter, focusing on staff and
their accomplishments. Such activities are very low to no cost.
Implementation Plan: The Employee Committee has become active again, and is focusing its efforts on
planning and fundraising for a Christmas Party. The City Manager will offer support to expand the
Employee Committee and encourage the Committee to plan events throughout the year. Submissions
to an in-house newsletter could be part of the purview of the Employee Committee. A greater focus will
be placed on city-wide lunches to provide employees the opportunity to interact between various
departments. NOTE: The Employee Committee has considered disbanding due to lack of interest in
participation and fundraising. Support and enthusiasm needs to come from the management level to
reinvigorate the committee and improve participation.
Timeline: This will be implemented continually, beginning immediately through the Employee
Committee.
Priority #2: Upward Mobility/Career Ladder
The Minority Recruitment Committee report included the observation that the City’s workforce does not mirror
the population served by the City, particularly as it relates to minorities. Based on the attachments provided to
the Committee’s report, in March 2011 nearly 84 percent of the City’s workforce was white. By comparison,
according to the 2010 Census, only 45.6 percent of the City’s population is white.
1. Implement a “mentoring” program to identify employees who may wish to move up the career ladder
within the City.
Implementation Plan: The Human Resource Department will be assigned the task of developing an
internal mentoring program. Each department will be asked to identify at least one professional or
management level staff person who would be interested in serving as a volunteer professional mentor.
An application process would be developed for employees interested in working with a mentor to
2
Page 27
develop their career skills, and employees would be matched with a mentor whose professional
background generally meets their career interests. The mentoring program could involve “shadowing”
the mentor as well as regular meetings to help build the mentoring relationship.
Timeline: The program would be developed and mentors identified during fall 2012, with the
implementation of the proposed program in spring 2013.
2. Guidelines relative to goals and eligibility should be developed and made available to all employees, via
website, newsletter, bulletin boards, handbooks, etc.
Implementation Plan: This will be part of the implementation of #1.
3. Develop strategies to recruit minorities for professional positions.
Implementation Plan: The City of Dover currently sends send copies of all job postings for professional
positions to all colleges and/or universities within the City of Dover, as well as the Historically Black
Colleges in Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. In addition, the City reaches out to
various churches and civic entities in an effort to expand the applicant pool for vacancies (Attachment A
lists the various entities). The City will also approach the Delaware chapter of the NAACP for
suggestions in recruiting minority applicants.
Timeline: Staff will meet with the Delaware chapter of the NAACP in the summer of 2012 to develop
ideas for additional ways to expand the potential applicant pool.
Priority #3: Enhanced Technology for City Image and Recruitment
The Minority Recruitment Committee has recommended that the City’s website be updated to improve
recruitment opportunities by including information on recruitment, employee benefits, the City’s commitment
to diversity, and departmental goals and responsibilities.
1. The City’s website should be enhanced to convey pertinent information that may be of interest to a
prospective employee.
Implementation Plan: The Human Resources Department will be assigned the task of reviewing the
City’s website information relating to employment and to develop content to provide improved
information about the City as an employer to prospective employees.
Timeline: This review will be complete and the website content updated by October 1, 2012. This
timeline may be delayed if updating the website results in substantial costs that need to be budgeted.
2. The City should have links that will give specific information about the Departments.
Implementation Plan: Each Department Head will be assigned the task of reviewing the website
content relating to that department and providing updates as necessary on a continual basis.
3
Page 28
Timeline: Departments will be required to review and update departmental information by July 2012,
with minimum quarterly reviews thereafter. This will ensure that the information remains fresh.
3. There should be a standard format for information representing departments.
Implementation Plan: The City’s new website has established a standard format.
Priority #4: Internship for high school and college students
The Minority Recruitment Committee recommended that the City develop a well-defined internship program for
high school and college students who may be interested in a career in municipal government. This program
would include concerted effort to recruit African-Americans, Hispanics, and women.
Implementation Plan: Beginning in fall 2012, the Human Resources Director will schedule meetings with the
local colleges and high schools to assess their interest in an internship program. If there appears to be interest,
the Human Resources Director will work with the City departments, colleges and high schools to outline an
internship program that matches the needs of the City departments with the academic and community service
goals of the participating schools. Several issues would need to be determined prior to implementation of such
an internship program, including:
Will this be a paid internship program or an unpaid program?
How would students be recruited and placed?
Would students be eligible for academic credit?
What liabilities would be the city be incurring?
These issues would need to be explored in working with the schools involved. It is likely that a program for high
school students would be different from a program for college students. These issues would need to be worked
out during the development of the program.
Timeline: Staff will contact the schools in the fall of 2012. If the interest exists among the high schools and
colleges in the area, an internship program could be outlined and potentially proposed for the fall of 2013 which
is part of the 2013/2014 academic year.
4
Page 29
Attachment A
MR MICHAEL BENEFIELD DELAWARE STATE UNIVERS I TY
DEPT OF LABOR/STATE OF DE
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CENTER CAREER PLANNING & PLACEMENT
DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SVCS
DEL TECH & COMM COLLEGE 1200 N DUPONT HIGHWAY
PO BOX 616
100 CAMPUS DR DOVER DE 19901
DOVER DE 19903
DOVER DE 19904
AMN & FAMILY READINESS CTR
MODERN MATURITY CENTER DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL REHAB
ATTN: JIM PACER
ATTN: ROSEANNE SMITH ATTN: DANA BURNAM
436 MSS/DPF
1121 FORREST AVE 1114 S DUPONT HIGHWAY STE 105
2 63 CHAD STREET 1ST FLOOR
DOVER DE 19904 DOVER DE 19901
DOVER AFB DE 19902
NAACP WILLIAM DAISY
UNION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH
ATTN: LEON LEWIS 215 PINE STREET
883 LINCOLN STREET
PO BOX 133 DOVER DE 19901
DOVER DE 19901
DOVER DE 19903
DEVELOPMENT DI SABILITIES COUNCIL
POLYTECH HIGH SCHOOL JOHN BAGLEY JR
ATTN: C WOOD, 2ND FLOOR
ATTN: JERRY HURLEY 63 SPRUANCE ROAD
MARGARET O'NEIL BLDG
PO BOX 97 DOVER DE 19901-4062
410 FEDERAL STREET STE 2
WOODSIDE DE 19980
DOVER DE 19901
DANNY O'NEAL
STACEY BRAGG
GERALDINE BECKETTE CASCADE REHAB COUNSELING
EMPLOYMENT SPECIALIST
l 5 T STATE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY VILLAGE OF WINDHOVER
DIVISION FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED
PO BOX 877 1306 BLATTY PLACE
13 SW FRONT STREET STE 105
GEORGETOWN DE 19947 NEWARK DE 19702
MILFORD DE 19963
PATSY WARE
MARY WILT DONNA RACINE
BEST TEMPS
POLYTECH ADULT EDUCATION SUSSEX TECH ADULT EDUCATION
386 W NORTH STREET STE A
PO BOX 102 PO BOX 351
DOVER DE 19904
WOODSIDE DE 19980 GEORGETOWN DE 19947
JOCELYN LANGREHR
SOLID ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH WHATCOAT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
VETERAN'S ADMINSITRATION
113 N WEST STREET 341 SALUSBURY RD
PO BOX 7344
DOVER DE 19901 DOVER DE 19904
WILMINGTON DE 19803-0344
PSYCHOTHEURAPEUTIC COMMUNITY
REV CV HOLMES
SERVICES ASSOCIATES CALVARY BAPTIST
236 N QUEEN STREET
ATTN: SHANENA FOGAN PO BOX 1859
DOVER DE 19901
PO BOX 1797 DOVER DE 19903
DOVER DE 19903
ELKS LODGE FIRST PILGR I M BAPTIST CHURCH FIRST PILGRIM BAPTIST CHURCH
PO BOX 881 161 MORGANS CHOICE ROAD 27 S CAESAR RODNEY AVENUE
DOVER DE 19903 CAMDEN DE 19934 CAMDEN DE 19934
POWERHOUSE MINISTRIES INC. HOLY TRINITY CHURCH OF LIVING GOD
SQUARE CLUB
115 E GLENWOOD AVENUE 425 W DIVISION ST
422 REED STREET
SMYRNA DE 19977 DOVER DE 19904
DOVER DE 19901
Updated 3/6/2012
Page 30
Attachment A
CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY HOWARD UNIVERSITY
SALISBURY STATE UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR CAREER & PROFESSIONAL CAREER SERVICES
CAREER SERVICES DEVELOPMENT BURLEIGH HALL
1837 UNIVERSITY CIRCLE STE 224B
TUBMAN QUADRANGLE
1101 CAMDEN AVENUE
PO BOX 200 2445 FOURTH STREET NW
SALISBURY MD 21801
CHEYNEY PA 19319 WASHINGTON, DC 20059
COPPIN STATE UNIVERSITY
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY
CAREER CENTER
CAREER CENTER CAREER CENTER
J MILLARD TAWES COLLEGE CTR
1700 E COLD SPRING LANE 14000 JERICHO PARK ROAD
2500 WEST NORTH AVENUE STE 113
BALTIMORE MD 21251 BOWIE MD 20715
BALITMORE MD 21216-3698
UNIV OF MD EASTERN SHORE LINCOLN UNIVERSITY
UNIV OF THE DISTRIC OF COLUMBIA
CTR FOR CAREER & PROFESSIONAL
OFFICE OF CAREER SERVICES COUNSELING & CAREER DEVELOP CTR
DEVELOPMENT
STUDENT SERVICE CTR STE 2158 BLDG 39 STE 120
1750 BALTIMORE PIKE
11898 COLLEGE BACKBONE ROAD 4200 CONNECTICUT AVENUE NW
PO BOX 179
PRINCESS ANNE MD 21853 WASHINGTON DC 2008
LINCOLN UNIVERSITY PA 19352
DR. BOBBY C. JONES
235 PEBBLE VALLEY DRIVE
DOVER DE 19904
Jpdated 3/6/12
Page 31
Attachment A
Wilmington College
University of Delaware Wesley College
Career Services Center
Career Services Center Career Services Center
320 N DuPont Highway
401 Academy Street 120 N State Street
New Castle DE 19720-6491
Newark DE 19716 Dover DE 19901
Page 32
ATTACHMENT #3
Council Committee of the Whole Meeting of 09/27/2016
Proposed Recommendations for Advancing a more effective Recruitment
Process for City Commissions, Committees and Boards
Council Colleagues,
Per our Council Committee of the Whole Meeting on 8/22/16, I would like to reiterate my
recommendations and suggestions to making the recruitment and selection Process for City
Boards and Committees more successful.
1. Advertise/publish vacancies via. Local Newspapers, City Website and City Social Media.
(To include information on how to apply and the duties of the particular board/commission.)
- Kay Sass, Public Relations
2. When applications of Interest are received by the City, provide City Council Members
copies of all applications and resumes to personally review before placing on Council Agenda
for Appointment. - City Clerk’s Office
3. Members currently serving on City Boards/Committees/Commissions wishing to be
reappointed and continuing to serve must reapply with an updated resume. - City Clerk’s
Office
4. A volunteer opportunities posting with all current vacancies be established on the
website.
5. New Board/Committee/Commission appointments must agree to go for sponsored
training provided by the DLLG or other training fascinators to assist in becoming more
familiar and to get a better understanding of the board/committee/commission they will be
serving on. This training will strengthen and enhance their role and duty.