DHRC Workshop Minutes and Attachments 1-2

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION WORKSHOP The Dover Human Relations Commission (DHRC) Workshop was held on May 25, 2017 at 6:03 p.m. with Chairman Henderson presiding. Members present were Mr. Fleming, Mr. Gaddis, Ms. Mullen, Reverend Paige, and Mrs. Herbert. Staff members present were City Solicitor Rodriguez (departed at 6:49 p.m.) and Mrs. Stein. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Gaddis moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Fleming and unanimously carried. Welcome - Explanation of Purpose of Workshop (Henderson) Mr. Henderson welcomed members to the DHRC Workshop. DHRC Authority and Holding of Meetings (Nicholas Rodriguez, City Solicitor) Mr. Nicholas Rodriguez, City Solicitor, advised members that the DHRC was formed in 2001, consisted of 15 members at that time, and currently had nine (9) members. He explained that the DHRC is an advisory commission and is to provide advice based upon the jurisdiction of the Commission as stated in the Code. Mr. Rodriguez indicated that the DHRC is similar to the State Human Relations Commission (SHRC), which is also an advisory commission and reports directly to the General Assembly and the Governor. He noted that neither the DHRC nor the SHRC is a decision-making body. Mr. Rodriguez stated that two (2) members of the DHRC are appointed to each of the four (4) City election districts and one (1) serves at large, and appointments are made by the Council President and approved by Council. He indicated that members are appointed for three-year staggered terms, and five (5) members constitute a quorum, which enables the Commission to do business. He indicated that DHRC meetings are to be held at City Hall on a quarterly basis and the Commission is to submit quarterly reports, as well as an annual report at the end of the year. Mr. Rodriguez advised that the DHRC is guided by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and the City Clerk’s Office helps with notice of meetings. He explained that there are no restrictions on reappointment; therefore, members can serve consecutive terms. Mr. Rodriguez reviewed several of the questions that had come up in the past regarding whether or not the DHRC had jurisdiction. He stated that a question had arisen about whether the DHRC could investigate a bill being decided by the General Assembly, noting that senators or representatives had asked the DHRC about this. Mr. Rodriguez stated that DHRC should not become involved in politics at all; however, if a bill arose dealing with civility or affecting the DHRC’s jurisdiction, the Commission could report this to Council. Mrs. Herbert advised that she had attended an SHRC meeting this month when a bill on homelessness was considered. She explained that those presenting the bill were trying to get the SHRC to make a statement about it; however, the SHRC was only comfortable stating that homeless people have rights. Mr. Rodriguez indicated that this matter would come under the DHRC’s jurisdiction on an advisory basis, but they should not become involved in supporting a bill. Mrs. Herbert stated that this is what the SHRC decided. Mr. Rodriguez advised members in this type of situation to notify the Council President that there is a bill that affects the jurisdiction.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 2 Reverend Paige questioned, for example, if she could speak out against the death penalty. In response, Mr. Rodriguez explained that she could do this as an individual but not as a member of the Commission. Mr. Rodriguez cited a situation when a Commissioner had missed a number of meetings and it was questioned if the DHRC could remove that Commissioner. He explained that the Commission could not do this and that removal could only be done at the recommendation of the Council President and with the concurrence of Council for substantial neglect of duty or gross misconduct in office, noting that missing a number of meetings would be considered substantial neglect of duty. Mr. Rodriguez indicated that when the DHRC’s structure had included 15 members, they were unable to obtain that number of Commissioners and wanted to run an ad in local newspapers to find people interested in serving. He advised that advertising was acceptable if it was paid for individually out of pocket. Mr. Henderson asked if such advertising could be paid out of the DHRC’s budget, and Mr. Rodriguez indicated that it could probably be; however, there may not have been money available in that particular case. He noted that the advertising strategy had worked well and resulted in a number of names that were submitted to the Council President and reviewed by Council. (City Clerk’s Office Note: In a legal opinion dated July 30, 2008, Mr. Rodriguez advised that “. . . the Commission itself has no power or authority to appoint or recruit new members. This is left completely up to the Mayor and Council. Newspaper advertising by the Commission for new members I think not only tends to invade the power and authority of the Mayor and Council but is not a necessary expense or expenditure, assuming that the newspaper advertisements are paid for out of funds budgeted for the Commission. . . .”) Referring to Section 58-33(e) Functions limited of the Dover Code, Mr. Rodriguez explained that the DHRC has no jurisdiction over matters that are assigned by law or decree to other governmental bodies. He noted that previously a complaint was received from an employee of Delaware State University (DSU) who indicated that they had been terminated based on race, which was a private matter between the employee and the University over which the DHRC had no jurisdiction. Mr. Rodriguez advised that this was also true of matters that must go through the court system or other governmental bodies. He stated that there had also been complaints about an employee of the City of Dover who was terminated, and this had to be handled through the City’s grievance procedure. Mrs. Herbert stated that the National Council on Life and Labor Research (NCALL) was trying to bring different groups together and had just held a “Bridge the Divide Community Café” at Wesley College that included the SHRC, Wesley College, and DSU. She stated that the DHRC had been left out of the forum and asked if the Commission could participate in such community events, noting that another forum was coming up. Mr. Rodriguez stated that this would not be a problem. Mr. Rodriguez informed members that there had also been a complaint about a termination in the private sector, and the DHRC had no jurisdiction over this. He stated that the individual would have to go to court and sue the employer if they thought this was necessary. Mr. Rodriguez explained that

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 3 another individual had not liked the assessment placed against her home, which she stated was based on race. He noted that she had the right to appeal the assessment through the City’s Board of Assessment Appeals. Mr. Rodriguez indicated that this individual complained that her car was damaged by the City when painting in the area and that this was systematic abuse of police power and discrimination based on national origin. He explained that it was up to this individual or her husband to sue the City for damage to her vehicle. Mr. Rodriguez advised that there had been an assault involving the Police Department, and this was something to be handled by the Police Department and not the DHRC. He indicated that there had been an attempted murder, three (3) different people had claimed that they had been threatened to be killed, and this had to be handled by the Police Department or Attorney General’s Office. Mr. Gaddis asked what Commissioners should do if a complaint is brought to one (1) of them. Responding, Mr. Rodriguez stated his belief that members would have a duty to give the complaint to the Commission to make a decision whether or not it was within the DHRC’s jurisdiction, and he offered to provide a legal opinion if they had a question. He noted that in a situation where members know definitely that a complaint is beyond their jurisdiction, such as a murder, they could state that the DHRC is an advisory board and this does not fall within their jurisdiction. Mr. Henderson noted that he, like Reverend Paige, is a pastor and would act as a citizen in a critical situation, such as a murder or something that is life threatening. He noted that he is associated with the Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance (IMA), which was involved in a number of social action initiatives relating to things like fair employment and the hiring of the City of Dover Police Chief. Mr. Henderson stated that he did not feel that he was “frozen” from acting. He indicated that he considered serving on the DHRC as an additional responsibility for which he would have to go through channels. Mrs. Herbert advised that she was new to the Commission. Referring to Section C.2 of the City of Dover Human Relations Strategic Plan - 2015-2018, she noted that this goal was to “Develop an understanding with the State Human Relations Commission that will delineate the roles and procedures of the two Commissions in the solution of alleged discrimination complaints which fall within the jurisdiction of the State Human Relations Commission and identify and maintain specific ways the two Commissions will work together.” She expressed confusion, stating that it seemed that the DHRC was to advise the SHRC if an issue arose; however, it sounded to her that most things should go to City Council, and she noted that she had gotten two (2) kinds of answers to this question when she spoke to members of the SHRC. Mrs. Herbert asked if the DHRC is supposed to advise the State Commission of problems the DHRC is experiencing, since the DHRC Strategic Plan indicated that the two (2) Commissions were supposed to work together. She advised that she was obtaining the names and phone numbers of people with whom she could talk regarding setting up sharing with the SHRC but did not wish to do this if the DHRC was not supposed to do so. Mr. Rodriguez noted that the SHRC is an advisory commission, as the DHRC is.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 4 Mrs. Herbert stated that it sounded as if the DHRC was supposed to advise Council, who would then decide who has jurisdiction. Responding, Mr. Rodriguez advised that he did not think this was necessary. He stated that if members were dealing with an issue that was beyond the DHRC’s jurisdiction or had questions that they felt must be answered by the State, members could bring them up with the SHRC. He provided a handout regarding State legislation relating to the creation of the SHRC and describing its jurisdiction (Attachment #1). Reverend Paige stated that the SHRC can investigate complaints of discrimination, which the DHRC cannot do. Mr. Rodriguez advised that the SHRC was given subpoena power; therefore, if they want to hear from witnesses in regard to complaints, they have the right to subpoena individuals to come before them to give testimony. He stated that subpoena power for the DHRC was previously brought up and Council decided that it was not necessary. Mr. Rodriguez indicated that members may want to bring this issue up again; otherwise, if they were investigating a matter and asked a private person to come voluntarily, this person would not have to do so. He noted that, if the DHRC had subpoena power, individuals would be required to come before the Commission. Mr. Rodriguez stated that he did not know Council’s thoughts on this, but subpoena power was probably something that members ought to have, and they could make that request to the Council President if they wanted to do so. He noted that they could utilize the fact that the SHRC has this power, stating that this was the only way the DHRC could fully develop an investigation. Mrs. Herbert stated her understanding that a lack of resources for the DHRC had been mentioned. Mr. Rodriguez indicated that this may be so; however, he stated that Commissioners’ positions were becoming more important all the time. He stated that the current times were more troubling than any he had ever seen, which made the DHRC’s position more important in trying to solve the problems. Reverend Paige expressed her belief that the missions of the SHRC and DHRC should walk together, noting that the SHRC has jurisdiction over the State and the DHRC over the corporate City. Responding, Mr. Rodriguez indicated that this was well put and that the commissions’ jurisdictions were the same, except that DHRC’s powers were limited to the City of Dover and the SHRC covers the State of Delaware. He stated that he thought the two (2) commissions were basically the same in their purpose and jurisdictions and both were advisory boards, with the SHRC advising the General Assembly and Governor and the DHRC advising the Council and Mayor. Mrs. Herbert asked if everything in the Strategic Plan had to stay in there, stating that there were several things that did not seem to make sense. She noted if that if the SHRC and DHRC were working separately, she could see why they would communicate, but if they were performing the same functions, with one (1) covering Dover and the other covering the whole State, she stated that they would not really be interacting. Mr. Rodriguez expressed his belief that Mrs. Herbert was right, stating that there had been occasions in the past when the DHRC wanted to ask the SHRC how they thought the DHRC should act. He indicated that the Commission could do this because the SHRC’s jurisdiction is Statewide, which would cover the City of Dover.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 5 Mr. Rodriguez stated that Councilman Sudler had previously served as Chair of the DHRC, did a fantastic job, and in 2012 held public meetings that covered two (2) critical topics: decreasing hate crimes in Dover and gang violence and organizations. He explained that Mr. Sudler had set up public meetings that were advertised and had knowledgeable speakers come, which Mr. Rodriguez stated was a very good thing to do. Mr. Rodriguez suggested that members read the 2012 DHRC Annual Report to City Council (Attachment #2), which was very comprehensive. Mr. Henderson asked if it was important for Commissioners to have a closer relationship with Council, and Mr. Rodriguez stated that he thought this would be good. Mr. Rodriguez advised that if members had any questions or matters to discuss, he would be happy to come to future meetings. Mr. Henderson asked what goes through the minds of City Council members when selecting a DHRC Commissioner. Responding, Mr. Rodriguez noted that factors are included in Chapter 58 - Human Relations Commission, of the Dover Code. Mr. Henderson pointed out that Sections 58-32(b) and (c) include provisions, and Mr. Fleming noted that Section 58-31. Purpose states that the DHRC is “to include members who are broadly representative of the entire community and who are committed to a philosophy of inclusion, intergroup cooperation, and fair treatment that will effectively help the city.” Mr. Fleming noted that Section 58-33(c) spoke to meetings of the DHRC and referenced five (5) meetings per year. He asked what procedure members would follow if they agreed to request that this section be changed, noting that this had not been discussed by members. Mr. Fleming suggested a possible change to state, “The Commission will hold as many meetings as is necessary to conduct the business of the Commission. Special meetings may be called by the chairman or three members of the commission. No fewer than five meetings per year. Meetings shall be held at City Hall and other places in the community in accordance with the laws of Delaware regarding the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and City of Dover procedures. The Commission will distribute its agenda and minutes through the City Clerk’s Office.” Mr. Fleming noted that when he had previously served on the DHRC, members were able to have meetings outside of City Hall. He stated that people had come to City Hall for meetings; however, the DHRC had also gone to other agencies or community associations within the City. Mr. Fleming noted that members were now prohibited from doing this. Responding, Mr. Rodriguez stated that the DHRC could request this to be changed by writing out suggested wording for amending the code and submitting it directly to the Council President, noting that the code could be revised through adoption of an ordinance by Council. He indicated that members could do this at the same time they submit any other changes they think necessary, such as the subpoena recommendation. Mr. Rodriguez indicated that he was unsure why members were restricted to meeting at City Hall; however, he stated that he thought locations should be limited to within the City of Dover. Mrs. Jody Stein, Administrative Assistant, City Clerk’s Office stated that this provision may be due to the fact that meetings are recorded. Mr. Henderson noted that recording and staffing by the Clerk’s Office could be a challenge.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 6 Reverend Paige asked why the DHRC was restricted from meeting outside City Hall and if other commissions, such as the Planning Commission fall under the same rules. She also questioned the rules regarding a gathering of more than a quorum of members. Reverend Paige asked if two (2) or three (3) members must keep DHRC business out of their conversation if they are having a casual dinner together because this would be considered a meeting. She indicated that she felt this restriction was a violation of free speech. In response, Mr. Rodriguez stated the need to be very careful, noting that it could be considered a violation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) if more than three (3) or four (4) members met, even if there was less than a quorum of members present. Reverend Paige stated that she was having trouble understanding this, noting that she may have dinner with a member or run into a member, and she asked if they were prohibited from mentioning DHRC topics in a casual dinner setting. In response, Mr. Rodriguez stated that he did not believe it would be a problem if a topic came up while members were socializing. He advised that the rules of public notice would be violated if there was a planned meeting for several members to discuss business that would come before the Commission. In response to Mr. Henderson, Mr. Rodriguez advised that Council was under the same restrictions and must comply with the Freedom of Information Act. Mrs. Herbert asked how meetings are announced, stating that she had not seen an announcement in the newspaper. Responding, Mr. Rodriguez advised that DHRC meetings are set up with the Chairman. Mrs. Herbert questioned how citizens are publicly notified of DHRC meetings. Responding, Mrs. Stein explained that meeting agendas are posted on the City of Dover website. Mrs. Herbert advised that meetings of some other organizations are advertised in the paper. She noted that some people do not have computers and some who might be interested are not involved because announcements are not put into some other form of media. Mr. Gaddis questioned how many citizens of Dover know there is a DHRC and expressed the need to publicize the Commission’s existence and its meetings, and Mr. Henderson indicated that this would be discussed later in the evening. Mrs. Herbert moved to recess, seconded by Reverend Paige and unanimously carried. Meeting recessed at 6:49 p.m. Mr. Fleming moved to reconvene, seconded by Mr. Gaddis and unanimously carried. The meeting reconvened at 7:00 p.m. Mr. Henderson stated that he liked the idea of revisiting subpoena power for the DHRC and the information that Council could change the frequency of meetings. Mrs. Herbert stated that the code change that Mr. Fleming had suggested would give the DHRC more freedom. She noted the problem with recording meetings but indicated that she did not know why this could not happen in another location.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 7 Mr. Henderson advised that the DHRC had held more than five (5) meetings per year since he had been a member. He noted that members had come and gone and stated that, for the sake of the continuity of the Commission, he had suggested having meetings once per month. Review of DHRC Strategic Plan 2015-2018 Long-Term Objectives and Development of Work Plans Mr. Anderson reviewed the Long-Term Objectives for the DHRC, as stated in the DHRC Strategic Plan 2015-2018, noting that objectives A.1, A.2, C.3, and C.4 applied to the Government Policy, Programs, and Practices Committee, chaired by Mr. Gaddis; objectives B.1, B.2, B.3 applied to the Community Engagement Committee, chaired by Ms. Mullen; objectives B.4 and D.3 applied to the Education Committee, on which Mr. Fleming was serving; and objectives D.1, and D.2 applied to the Communications Committee, chaired by Reverend Paige. He noted that objective D.2 regarding improving community awareness of the Commission and a better understanding of its role would also fall within the scope of Ms. Mullen and the Community Engagement Committee. He stated that long-term objectives that applied to the Commission as a whole were objectives C.1, C.2, D.4, and D.5. In regard to objective A.2 “Building on its partnership with the Dover Police Department, identify additional human relations approaches and lessons that can be integrated into the Dover Police Department’s ongoing Community Relations strategy,” Mr. Henderson suggested getting in touch with the new City of Dover Police Chief and possibly having him come and speak to the Commission. In regard to objective C.1, “Define when a diversity, inclusion and or a human relations issue exists and specify the types of these issues that will be accepted by the Commission; and, identify and implement a process for receiving and responding to such issues by taking action to correct or improve the situation,” Mr. Henderson advised that all members were responsible for this objective. Mrs. Herbert asked how this would be done by all members. Responding, Mr. Henderson stated that the problem would first have to be identified and members would come together to discuss it in a meeting setting. Mr. Henderson referred to objective C.2, “Develop an understanding with the State Human Relations Commission that will delineate the roles and procedures of the two Commissions in the solution of alleged discrimination complaints which fall within the jurisdiction of the State Human Relations Commission and identify and maintain specific ways the two Commissions will work together.” Mrs. Herbert stated that someone needed to liaison with the SHRC to accomplish this goal, noting that it is hard to find the right person to talk to and she did not see this as a group activity, unless subjects are identified for the group to deal with. Mr. Henderson indicated that Mrs. Herbert had recently attended an SHRC meeting, and he was very impressed with the input she provided regarding this event. He suggested that she would be an excellent liaison. Mrs. Herbert stated she could do this and Mr. Henderson offered to attend meetings with her.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 8 Responding to Mr. Henderson, Mrs. Stein stated that typically the items identified for action during workshops are placed on subsequent meeting agendas for consideration. Mr. Henderson offered to attend SHRC meetings with Mrs. Herbert. She stated that she hoped to be able to sit down with someone from the SHRC, noting that the people in charge appeared to be in Wilmington, rather than Dover, although she noted that Councilman Sudler was serving on the SHRC. Mrs. Herbert advised that Mr. Calvin Christopher, Chair, SHRC, is a volunteer. She indicated that if the DHRC would be referring items to the SHRC or if SHRC would be looking at the DHRC’s actions because the DHRC is in the State, it would be nice to know that the DHRC is doing things correctly. She requested that consideration of a DHRC liaison to the SHRC be placed on the next DHRC agenda, and Mr. Henderson agreed. Mr. Henderson referred to objective D.5, “Identify and seek funding from other governmental, philanthropic, or private organizations to more effectively carry out its responsibilities.” Mrs. Herbert indicated that she was not sure about fundraising as an objective, stating that the DHRC would not be writing grants and was not keeping numbers regarding referrals. She stated that the DHRC may know what the issues are in the community; however, empirical data would be needed to obtain funding. Mrs. Herbert stated that, in her opinion, this objective should not be in the Strategic Plan. Reverend Paige asked if this provision of the Plan was new. Responding, Mr. Fleming stated that he did not recall this provision during his past service. Mrs. Herbert stated that the Commission had enough to do without trying to raise funds, and Reverend Paige indicated that she did not feel that this objective was needed. Mr. Henderson asked if this provision in the Strategic Plan could be amended. Responding, Mrs. Stein advised that if members wished to make changes to the strategic plan, they may want to consider this as a future agenda item, gather all of their recommendations, and then submit them to Council. Mrs. Herbert noted that there were three (3) potential changes to consider, including subpoena power, Mr. Fleming’s suggestion about expanding Council meetings, and the elimination of long-term objective D.5 in the Strategic Plan regarding fundraising. In regard to the Community Engagement Committee, Mrs. Mullen stated that a DHRC brochure that included bullet points regarding the Commission’s functions would be helpful in achieving her goals and objectives. Mr. Fleming noted the Commission had previously had a brochure, and Mrs. Stein noted that it had been attached to previous Commission minutes. Mrs. Herbert advised that those who attended the Community Café Event at Wesley College had not known that the DHRC existed. Responding, Mr. Henderson indicated that DHRC members had been coming and going since he had been on the Commission and that membership had been affected by Section 58-32(d) of the code, which states that no member of the Commission shall hold any elected or appointed position. Mr. Gaddis moved to recess, seconded by Mr. Fleming.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 9 Meeting recessed at 7:28 p.m. Reverend Paige moved to reconvene, seconded by Mr. Fleming. Meeting reconvened at 7:34 p.m. Mr. Henderson noted the desire to establish goals for the DHRC Committees and for the DHRC as a whole. In regard to the Government Policies, Programs, and Practices (GPPP) Committee, Mr. Gaddis stated a goal of finding outside people to serve on the Committee. He advised that he would be unable to accomplish the goals by himself and thought this applied to all of the committees. Mr. Gaddis indicated that an additional goal was to be formally introduced to the City Manager, Human Resources Director, Police Chief, and union representatives, stating the desire to meet both management and labor. In response to Mr. Gaddis regarding where to access the City’s Code of Ordinances, Mrs. Stein explained that there was a link to the City’s municipal code on the home page of the City of Dover website. Mr. Gaddis referred to objective C.4, “In cooperation and partnership with community organizations and public and private mediation services, assist in developing plans for monitoring sources of intergroup conflict and for responding to and managing community conflicts and disruptions in Dover; and participate in managing community conflicts in accordance with these plans.” He indicated that, in order to accomplish this, he needed to know what formal organizations are known to the City of Dover. Mr. Gaddis stated that he was aware of the Sankofa African Dance Company and several churches that were community organizations but was unsure about others. Mrs. Herbert suggested that the newspaper may be helpful. Ms. Mullen asked if Mr. Gaddis was thinking of Masonic lodges, etc. Responding, Mr. Gaddis indicated that he was thinking of lodges, as well as Asian-American and Hispanic organizations. He noted that there is an African American Festival in the City but was unsure if there was an Asian or Hispanic festival and questioned whom he should contact. Responding, Mr. Henderson advised that this goal applied to several of the committees, noting that members should help and communicate with each other. He explained that Reverend Paige is a fellow member of the clergy and that he and Reverend Paige serve on numerous commissions, including the very active Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance (IMA). Mr. Henderson advised that Reverend Paige is very involved in the community, as are her sister, Dr. Wilma Mishoe, and her nephew, Councilman Sudler. He indicated that members could find this information on their own and share it with each other. Ms. Mullen informed members that she had an opportunity to participate in a radio talk show segment and asked if this would be permissible. Responding, Mrs. Stein indicated that this could be placed on a meeting agenda for members’ consideration and, if they chose, this could be recommended to Council.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 10 Mr. Henderson cautioned members to be careful with social media, such as tweets. He advised that a previous commissioner had issued a politically slanted social media message, which caused problems; however, he stated that he did not have a problem with Ms. Mullen’s proposal. Ms. Mullen stated that one (1) of her goals was to increase awareness within the community through radio, brochures, and literature, and she indicated that this would overlap with Reverend Paige’s goals for the Communications Committee. Mr. Fleming advised that this goal would also overlap with the Education Committee’s goals. Reverend Paige advised that the Communications Committee would be involved with every committee, because they would each have information to disseminate and the Communications Committee could help with this. Referring to Commissioner Mullen’s idea about a brochure, she explained that all members would work together to promote this. Reverend Paige stated the need to be careful with social media; however, she noted that it could be a valuable tool. She indicated that an expungement clinic had recently been held that serviced more than 100 people, and most of the participants found out about it on social media through flyers that were posted on a Facebook page. Reverend Paige explained that the IMA has a social action page that she updates when there are events. She stated the need to use social media for informational purposes, such as advertising, and not for editorials. Mr. Fleming stated that members’ new business cards would also help to increase awareness. Ms. Mullen stated the goal to educate the Dover community concerning the purpose and mission of the Commission. She noted that there is an African American Festival in Dover and suggested the possibility of holding a Unity Day to bridge the community. Mr. Henderson suggested that Ms. Mullen contact Mr. George Bailey, who works at Sam’s Club, in this regard, stating that Mr. Bailey has information about various observances and could be a resource for the Community Engagement Committee. Ms. Mullen indicated that this type of event would benefit the City as an attempt to alleviate discrimination by acknowledging the differences that make people unique. She suggested naming the event “Diversity Day,” and Mrs. Herbert stated that she had been thinking about “Unity Day,” but also liked “Diversity Day.” Reverend Paige indicated that she liked “Unity Day.” In regard to goals for the Education Committee, Mr. Fleming stated that he thought handing out members’ new business cards to different groups and individuals would help to get the news out to a degree. He noted that he also liked the brochures that the DHRC had previously distributed, noting that members could set up a table outside of Walmart or Sam’s Club to distribute brochures and answer questions. He asked if the Commission had a budget to print in the newspaper the fact that there is a DHRC, who the members are, and their numbers. Mr. Fleming asked if people from the community had come to the Commission in last six (6) months or year stating that they had a problem or concerns relating to diversity, inclusion, or prejudicial treatment. Mrs. Herbert stated that the DHRC should put out something stating that they exist; however, she was concerned that people would then begin to come to the DHRC, and she expressed

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 11 the need for liaison with the SHRC. In response, Mr. Fleming advised that, during his prior service, the DHRC did not deal much with the SHRC. He explained that the SHRC was not unwilling to help, but they had other matters to attend to and the DHRC was dealing with Dover concerns. He noted that when people raised concerns about having to pay too much for their gas bills, the DHRC had a seminar where individuals from Chesapeake Utilities explained how to save money for heating and oil. Mr. Fleming indicated that people must be from Dover in order for their DHRC to hear their complaints or concerns. Mr. Fleming indicated that he was developing goals for the Education Committee but was open to suggestion. Mr. Henderson suggested that all members publicize any symposiums, studies, or programs offered by the University of Delaware or DSU about diversity, Hispanic appreciation, African-American history, etc. He noted that the Dover Public Library might be another good resource for the Education Committee, noting that they are in touch with various commissions and programs. Mr. Henderson advised that the DHRC had helped to sponsor a “Cracking the Code” film through the library and suggested that the library be asked what opportunities they may have relating to the DHRC’s goals. Mr. Fleming noted that he had taught as an adjunct at Wilmington University in multicultural education for people going through the career and technical degree program. In addition, he indicated that he and would not object to talking with the Capital School District to see if there was something Mr. Fleming could do or some medium that the District could use to get the word out about the DHRC. Mr. Henderson noted that he serves as the current President-Elect of the rotary, and that Mr. Dan Shelton, Capital School District Superintendent, is also a member and wants to work with the DHRC. Mr. Henderson invited each member of the DHRC to attend a rotary meeting as his personal guest, noting that the Mayor, City Councilmen, lawyers, doctors, etc., attend these meetings. He advised that meetings are held at Maple Dale Country Club at noon on Thursdays and that this would be another way to engage and educate others. Mrs. Herbert noted that Mr. Henderson had mentioned putting out information regarding diversity, etc., and asked how this would be done. She asked if the DHRC had a website. Responding, Mrs. Stein explained that the DHRC has a webpage on the City of Dover website and could post content through the City Clerk’s Office. Mr. Fleming pointed out that the website was listed on members’ business cards; however, a great many people do not use website intel. Mr. Gaddis asked if website content would have to be discussed in a meeting, voted on, and approved by Council. He noted that this would involve a series of steps, and it may take a while for information to be posted if there was not a Council meeting at the right time. Responding, Mrs. Stein stated that she was unsure if this would be required for the posting of events, since the webpage had not been utilized for this purpose. She suggested that members agree on an overall vision of how they would like the webpage to look, noting that this information would be forwarded

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 12 to Council with the Commission’s minutes. Mrs. Stein stated that it may then be possible to just update information that has been posted. Mrs. Herbert stated the desire to cover all things and be inclusive with content. In regard to goals for the Communications Committee, Reverend Paige indicated that she saw her position as working with the other committees and promoting them by helping them to get the word out. She stated that the DHRC’s mission should be on the website, as well as upcoming activities. Reverend Paige also suggested including information to help residents, noting that the first thing that occurred to her was how to apply for housing. Mr. Fleming suggested submitting a picture of the Commission, including their members’ names, in The Dover Post or Delaware State News and inviting people to come to a meeting. He indicated that the DHRC could have a booth at the Dover Days festival and pass out business cards and brochures, noting that this would be expensive. Reverend Paige indicated that Restoring Central Dover’s Community Day would have been a good opportunity for a DHRC table. Mr. Henderson asked if members had held a workshop before. Responding, Mr. Fleming indicated that this had not occurred during his prior service, and Mr. Henderson stated that this had not occurred during his service either. Mr. Henderson stated the desire for members to support and encourage each other as they pursue goals. He noted that having subpoena power would be powerful. Reverend Paige expressed her opinion that things must be worked in gradually and suggested making small changes and doing this well, before asking for something else. She suggested allowing Council to see the benefits and advantages of granting DHRC requests, noting that the DHRC may be rejected if they ask for everything at once. Mr. Fleming concurred, stating that if subpoena power was requested, Council would ask members whom they wanted to subpoena, and he did not think subpoena power was needed now. Mrs. Herbert noted that when it is found that the DHRC has subpoena power, members would be seen as those who pull people in and subpoena them, rather than being there to help people. Mrs. Herbert referred to Mr. Fleming’s comment about a presentation that had previously been given regarding home heating. She indicated that she liked the idea of networking in this way and having presentations that helped to connect people with resources, such as the “Bridge the Divide Community Café” at Wesley College, where professionals in separate rooms had discussed topics and answered questions for those who were interested. She noted that, during the first portion of the event, there was also discussion about what people saw as creating a divide as opposed to bridging it. In response to Mr. Henderson regarding contact information for those involved in the event, she stated that she was awaiting information from the event and would provide it to members. She noted those who attended included individuals from the SHRC, community police officers, and individuals from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Dover High School, and DSU, and Reverend Will Grimes from NCALL. Reverend Paige suggested that members work during the next six (6) months on workshops and awareness programs, by either inviting people in or going to them, or perhaps doing a combination.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 13 She indicated that this would be a good way to start getting the DHRC’s name out and show what they are doing. Reverend Paige advised that this would impress Council, and the DHRC could then move on to the next items that members want to get done. She suggested having someone come to talk about landlord/tenant issues or discuss the landlord/tenant code. Reverend Paige indicated that residents are supposed to receive a copy of this code when they pay their deposit and sign their agreements; however, many landlords do not provide it. Responding to Mr. Henderson regarding the possibility of setting a goal to sponsor these types of symposiums or educational experiences, Mrs. Stein expressed her opinion that this is what the Commission was all about. Mrs. Herbert asked if it was desired to get involved with those who sponsored the Community Café, and Mr. Henderson indicated that it was. Mr. Gaddis expressed the need for members to sell the DHRC to Council, stating that he was unsure if Council thought they were of any importance, and Mr. Henderson concurred. Mr. Henderson stated the desire for Council to recognize the DHRC as a significant committee working toward its goals and the good of the community. Mrs. Mullen stated that she had formulated relationships with Councilmen Cole and Neil and the Mayor, and had recently done this with Councilman Sudler. She indicated that it had taken action on her part to do some engaging, and they had gotten to know her and what part she was playing in the community. Ms. Mullen indicated that her neighborhood association board had met at City Hall with the Mayor and Police Chief and noted that these individuals will engage. Mrs. Herbert advised that the Representative Sean Lynn comes to many events as well. Reverend Paige indicated that if the DHRC was involved in these kinds of activities they would be able to show Council exactly what they are engaged in rather than telling them. Mr. Henderson noted the importance of putting information on the website, online, and in the newspapers so that the DHRC will be recognized in the community. He stated the desire to accomplish what the Commission was charged to do and for members to feel empowered. Reverend Paige suggested prioritizing by picking three (3) or four (4) things and doing them well, rather than having members overextend themselves. Mrs. Herbert suggested that Unity Day be a goal that members would work toward in the future. She indicated that this should be a cumulative goal following the first year or year-and-a half. Reverend Paige and Mrs. Herbert suggested that all members obtain Commission shirts, and Mrs. Herbert suggested that members wear them in a parade, such as a Christmas parade. Mrs. Stein explained that former Commissioner Bogle arranged to have City of Dover shirts embroidered for members through Dover High School and asked if another member would be willing to take on this task. Responding, Mr. Henderson indicated that he would be willing to do so.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 25, 2017 PAGE 14 Mr. Henderson thanked Mrs. Stein for her efforts in support of the Commission. He noted that he would be helping all of the committees. Mr. Henderson advised that three (3) vacancies remained on the Commission, in the First, Second, and Fourth Districts, and stated that he would encourage Council to appoint more members. Mr. Henderson asked if members wanted to continue meeting on a monthly basis or take a summer break. After discussion, members agreed to schedule their next meeting for June 22, 2016. Public Comment There were no members of the public present wishing to comment. Mr. Gaddis moved for adjournment, seconded by Mrs. Herbert and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Theodore A. Henderson Chair TAH/JS/dd S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Misc-Minutes\HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION\2017\05-25-2017 DHRC Workshop Minutes.wpd Attachments Attachment #1 - Handout - State Legislation Regarding the Creation and Jurisdiction of the State Human Relations Commission provided by Mr. Nicholas Rodriguez, City Solicitor Attachment #2 - 2012 DHRC Annual Report to City Council

ATTACHMENT #1 Dover Human Relations CommissionWorkshop of 05/25/2017 ST ATE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION This Commission is created under 31 Del. C. §3001 and consists of 28 Members with powers and duties to cooperate with the Governor, the General Assembly , public agencies, civil groups, etc. To this end, the Commission may act as a conciliator in matters involving race, age, marital status, color, sex, disability, creed, national origin or ancestry, provided that they comply with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. They may make investigations, surveys, and studies as are permitted in the performance of its duties, to make recommendations to the Governor and General Assembly concerning needed legislation. So, really, the State Human Relations Commission is alse an dviso group; although, in investigating cases within their jurisdiction to give aclvismy i:.~Gornmendations, they have the subpoena power to get witnesses to testify before tbe Commission. At one point, a motion was made to give the Dover Commission the subpoena power. This was never implemented by Council.

ATTACHMENT #2 Dover Human Relations Commission Workshop of 05/25/2017 DHRC 2012 ANNUAL REPORT Presented by: Roy Sudler, Jr. Title: Chairman Date: March 25, 2013

Contents of Presentation 1. Origin of the Commission 2. Enabling Legislative Powers and Duties 3. Operating Procedural Flowchart 4. Intake Forms Reported 5. Complaint Against DHRC 6. DHRC Concerns and Recommendations 7. Certificates of Training 8. Special Forum on How to Report Hate Crimes 9. Proposed Resolution and Funding 10. Questions

Origin of the Commission 2001 - Controversial Death of Dover Resident Reginald Hannah vs. Dover Police Department A). Death Threats and shots fired towards Dover Police Officers B). Racial Tension Between the African and Caucasian American Community

Enabling Legislative Powers & Duties 1. Pursuant to Chapter 2 – Administrative, Article I, Division 6, Section 2 – 21 and Article II Section 58 – 31 Titled: Human Relations Commission’s Purpose; 2. DHRC – Commissioners: Dr. Kim Warfield, Dr. Phyllis Edamatsu, Dr. Linda Hackett, Mrs. Faye D. White, Ms. Justina Brewington, Mr. Thomas Steele, Mrs. Ellen O. Wasfi, Vice – Chair Dawn Allen Pyne and Chairman DHRC Roy Sudler, Jr.

DHRC - Active Committees; Intake Screening Committee Chair [Dr. Kim Warfield] School Programs Chair [Ellen O. Wasfi] Assessment Chair [Dr. Phyllis Edamatsu] Community Programs Chair [Vice Chair -Dawn Allen Pyne] Fiduciary Duties of DHRC Commissioners: Each Commission Member has a fiduciary duty to be non-bias in investigating and resolving case disputes. Commission Member’s exemplify unique professional and personal characteristics, that are imperative for allowing the commission to properly carry out and effectively accomplish the objectives, functions, and services contemplated by Division 6, Section 2-21 of the Dover Code.

D, Commlqg l o n Mee-ting F'9wcl>et r l Meeting Procedural F low chart P ublic P r e-.t-t11lr11 ;1 1r1 Regu lor M ooting without prior NnfleA AQ~nr.f.a I tem "'New l n teko r o,.m Bu:>i n C3s .. et a Cumpleten 1n r1Ays t<egu lar Wloetlng ~ before M eeting ....,, . -i Fact- r inding Pitt>llc SP""al<.s- rer3o n r"iGno & Refer to R es.pons• P:.n.y r'liecrslon Making Meeti ng Ck>s.ed - I ,/ Report / /" . Cui 11 1rlis:sio n Aco:lln n Cu1tlh 1ut:S to T akP. Mnr1 ~~ -rectimony O ec1s t.0n-Mak1n9 lcouc Di:.cuo3cd em o ~ Oooido No .Jurbd ictlon tAee thl1J r. nrnm l.ssJon In Pl•b ic. F- R"r,_.- But no Act ual Tootimony Oeelsion l . o . , Recommo nctot•on. No Ju1isdic t .on Opinion of Commlccion

DHRC Intake Forms Reported • 3/5 Index Cards 1 Promoting Racial Tension • Alleged Police Brutality 2 Complaint against Dover Police Department • Henry Fordham’s Alleged 3 Lynching and Hate Crime Complaint [pg. 29 – 35]

3/5 Index Cards Promoting Racial Tension

Complaint Filed against the Dover Human Relations Commission Filed with the City Clerk’s Office by Mr. Eshed Alston of Dover, Delaware. (Review Page 33)

DHRC – CONCERNS 1. FLOWCHART BEING ADHERED TO PURSUANT TO THE CITY OF DOVER’S BY-LAWS FOR THE DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ARTICLE IV- COMMISSION INTAKE, NOTICE AND MEETING PROCEDURES SECTION : 1 [BRINGING FORTH MATTERS] VII. FORMS 2. ARTICLE II SECTION 58-33. ORGANIZATION; QUORUM; MEETINGS; RULES OF PROCEDURE; LIMITATION OF FUNCTIONS; AGREEMENTS; COMPENSATION; LEGAL COUNSEL; REPORTS. (E) LIMITED FUNCTIONS OF THE COMMISSION

Landlord/Tenant Training 2012 Presented by the Law Office of Michael P. Morton, PA. mmorton@michae lpmorton.com (302) 426.1313

INVESTIGATING AND PROSECUTING HATE CRIMES Del .;:n111~re $'t~te u 1-.iv~r,;: i ty Martin Lu'ther Kins, Jr. Stud•nt S•rvic:cs C~n t~r 1:!:00 N . DuPon t H i,shwav Do"\#er, Delaware 8:00- 9 : 00 ~. m . RECISTRATION 9:oo- 9 :3o· a.m. OPENING REMARKS Ch ;;u· h:~ M . Obel'ly, Ill, United States. /\tto,.ney, O ist1·1ct of L>elawa r e Matt Nosanchuk, Senior Counsel or, Clvll Rig hts Division, USDOJ Delaware State u n1vers11v H.ep r esen tativr.t 9 : 30 - l.0:15 ;;i.m. LEGAL OVCRVICW OF F EDERAL HATE CRIMES LAW MyQ:,h;;:i Br;Jt;i<::n., Tf'i ~ I Al\Ofoey, USOOJ Civil t-tigh ts t>i v lslon 10:15 - 10:"15 a.m. FBI BrlQflna - F8V$ Rolu in thu lnvcu;tig~tion ot Hr.at<.! Cr-im-.:~ C>r cw W i l tt s , Svpc.,;rvi ~r-y Speci ttl Ageo1, F BI HQ 10:45 - 11:00 B R EAK :1.1:00 - 12:00 p.n1. HATE CRIME CASC STUDY Slu::r11,1rult:1ol1 Hott• r1·i1ru: Mye!'. h.a Bl"aden. Tl"lal Att01"11ey; USDOJ C IVIi R.lghts Division F BI Special Asent Alan Jones 12: 00 - 1 :15 p.m. LUNCH DRCAI< (on you,. own) 1:15 - 2:4S p.m. SPECIAL GUEST SPEAKERS Sheriff Oc:sve O'Ma1ll<:y - form~r Chic:::f of Police::,. Lt1 r ttrr1ic:, Wyun1ing J ud y Sh f~()~u·d - Mothc;!r M : tll.h €: w Sh e p "91'CI 2 :45 - 3.:00 p .m. BREAK 3:00 - 3:45 p.m. TOWN l.fAL.L: FOSTERING COOPCRATION OET\IVEEN LAW ENFORCEMENT and the COMMUNITY rV1ode.·.,.to1·: C h.'ltlef. M . Obe f ly. I ll, United St.'Jle.s /\tl o r·nev·. Oi$"tficl of D e l~-.".... a r·t'! Panellsts: T flcl a G i bbs, Supel"vlsory Speclal Agent,. FBI; Delaware Hal"preet Singh Mokha. Regl onel Ol r ectol". Community R.elatlons Service Ftomo11a S. Fl.1ll1n.;.1,, Olrector, (>elawi're Offic e of H un°lan K e l a tioo'I$ l(en Haltom, a.,ief Prosecutor. Kent County, O E Oepartn1ent of Justice 3:45 - 4:00 p . m . CLOSI NG REMARKS

*********************************** COMMUNIITY & STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN RESOLVING RACE HATE CRIMES IN COMMUNITIES & HIGHER LEARNING INSTITUTIONS *********************************** PARTNERSHIP: DE – Department of Justice House of Representatives – 31st District SHRC – Human Relations Commission DSU – Police Department DSU- Counseling Department DSU- Freshman Student Dover Community Leaders [Pg. 18 – 29]

Private Sector – Salisbury Rd.

Private Sector South DuPont Highway

Downtown Dover

Private Sector North DuPont Highway

Private Sector South Little Creek Rd.

RESOLUTION: CESSATION OF ILLEGAL GANG FORMATION IN DOVER, DELAWARE ******************* Whereas; The City of Dover, the State Capital, strives to be a model for all Cities in Delaware and the OJJDP FY 2012 Defending United State. Childhood Resource Center: Whereas; The Mayor and City Council have granted Powers and Duties to the  Improving the Nation’s Dover Human Relations Response to Children Commission, Pursuant to Expose to Violence. Article II. Sec. 58-31.

That Concludes the Dover Human Relations Commission’s Annual Report

QUESTIONS ?

DHRC 2012 ANNUAL REPORT SUBMITTED BY: CHAIRMAN ROY SUDLER, JR. DATE: 2 / 27 / 2013 1

ANNUAL REPORT 2012 INTRODUCTION: The Dover Human Relation Commission [DHRC] is an advisory body created by the Mayor and City Council in the year 2001. The Commission’s charge is to focus on helping to decreasing racial tension and discrimination throughout the City of Dover. Pursuant to Chapter 2 – Administrative, Article I, Division 6, Section 2 – 21 of the Dover Code; The Commission has been granted the powers and duties to investigate claims of unfair treatment and develop ways to monitor intergroup conflict among all segments of the City of Dover. The purpose of the Dover Human Relations Commission is to serve as the focal point for monitoring amicable relations between diverse races in the City of Dover. The goal of the commission is to increase the quality of living for all constituents of Dover by reviewing city programs, activities, functions and ordinance to enhance communication and encourage cooperation among all residents of Dover. The Commission consists of members appointed by 15; Mayor: 5 Members; Council President based upon recommendations of Council: 10 Members/Confirmed by Council that reside in the Dover for a three year term, which commissioners serve without monetary compensation. The current members of the Dover Human Relations Commission include Mr. Roy Sudler, Jr. – Chairman, Mrs. Dawn Allen Pyne – Vice Chairwomen, Dr. Kim Warfield, Dr. Phyllis Edamatsu, Dr. Linda Hackett, Mrs. Fay D. White and Ms. Justina Brewington and Ellen O. Wasfi. All Commission Members have experienced the long term demands often requiring considerable time, extended periods and dedication to addressing multi – faceted unfair treatment claims and racial tension in the City of Dover. The Commission’s efforts are aimed at those who are suffering from discrimination and racial tension in the City of Dover. Each Commissioner has a fiduciary duty to be non-bias in resolving case disputes and suggest alternative dispute resolutions between all parties. Commissioners have unique professional and personal characteristics that are imperative for allowing the commission to properly carry out and accomplish effectively the objectives, functions, and services contemplated by Division 6, Section 2-21 of the Dover Code. 2

The Commission has four active committees; 1. Intake Screening Committee Chair [Dr. Kim Warfield] 2. School Programs Chair [Ellen O. Wasfi] 3. Assessment Chair [Dr. Phyllis Edamatsu] 4. Community Programs Chair [Vice Chair -Dawn Allen Pyne] The Commission’s enabling legislation powers and duties are pursuant to code –section 58 31– 33, which states the following: ARTICLE II. HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Sec. 58-31. Purpose. The city council has deemed it to be in the best interest of the city to establish a human relations commission to include members who are broadly representative of the entire community and who are committed to a philosophy of inclusion, intergroup cooperation, and fair treatment that will effectively help the city meet the following needs: (1) Fairness, respect. Promote and develop an environment of fairness and respect among its citizens; (2) Monitoring. Develop ways to measure and monitor community relations, particularly those that are sources of intergroup conflict; (3) Intergroup relations. Involve all segments of the community in understanding and appreciating the benefits of positive intergroup relations; (4) Issues. Offer a range of programs and services that will help its residents and neighborhoods prevent and resolve issues of human relations; and (5) Intergroup conflict. Develop ways of anticipating, preparing for, and relieving community tensions arising from intergroup conflict. (Code 1981, § 2-16; Ord. of 2-11-2002) Sec. 58-32. Established; composition; appointment; representation; holding other office; removal from office; terms of office; vacancies; reappointments. (a) Established. There is hereby established an advisory commission to be known as the "City of Dover Human Relations Commission," to carry out the objectives as described in this article. (b) Composition; appointment. The commission shall consist of 15 members, all residents of the city. Five of these members shall be appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the city council. Ten of these members shall be appointed by the president of the council, based upon recommendations from the council and confirmed by the council. (c) Representation. In selecting the membership of the commission, the mayor and president of the council and the council shall take particular care to ensure that the commission is broadly representative of racial, religious, gender and ethnic groups residing in the city. 3

(d) Holding other office; removal. No member of the commission shall hold any elected or appointed office under the government of the United States or the state, county, or city, or be a candidate for any such office. The mayor or the city council president may remove members of the commission, with the concurrence of the city council, for substantial neglect of duty, or gross misconduct in office. (e) Terms of office; vacancies. A member of the commission shall be appointed for a term of office of three years and until his successor has been appointed and has qualified. The appointees shall be appointed for staggered terms of office. When a vacancy occurs in the membership of the commission, it shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired portion of the term in the same manner as the original appointment. (f) Reappointments. Members may be reappointed. (Code 1981, § 2-17; Ord. of 2-11-2002) Sec. 58-33. Organization; quorum; meetings; rules of procedure; limitation of functions; agreements; compensation; legal counsel; reports. (a) Organization. The human relations commission shall annually elect its own chairperson to preside over its meetings and may create and fill such other offices and committees among its members as may be found necessary and proper for its effective organization. (b) Quorum. A majority of the membership of the commission shall constitute a quorum and, if a quorum is present, a vacancy on the commission shall not impair the right of the remaining members to exercise all the powers of the commission. (c) Meetings. The commission shall hold such meetings as may be deemed necessary for the completion of its purposes, responsibilities and functions. Regular meetings shall be held at least once per month unless there is no business to be considered by the commission. Special meetings may be called by the chairperson or three members of the commission. (d) Rules of procedure. The commission is also authorized to adopt rules of procedure for the conduct of its meetings. (e) Functions limited. The commission shall not involve itself in activities or functions already assigned by law or decree to other governmental bodies. (f) Agreements. The commission may enter into agreements and build partnerships with other entities and organizations for the purpose of more efficiently and effectively carrying out its responsibilities. (g) Compensation. Members of the commission shall receive no compensation. (h) Legal counsel. The city solicitor shall provide legal counsel to the commission and shall be the legal representative of the commission in connection with its duties hereunder, on a case-by-case basis, or determine that outside counsel is needed and obtain such outside counsel for a particular matter. 4

(i) Reports. The commission shall make such reports to the mayor and city council as shall be periodically necessary. An annual report of its accomplishments and a summary of its recommendations, as appropriate, shall be sent to the mayor and the city council. (Code 1981, § 2-18; Ord. of 2-11-2002) On January 3, 2012, @ approximately 3:44 p.m., Dr. Joe Burden Jr. called the Dover Human Relations Commission Chair to discuss a 3/5 Index Card that was found on his property by one of his residents. The Index Card displayed an image of a person of color hanging from a tree by a rope tied to his neck. After listening to his concerns, I advised him to submit the Index Card to the Human Resource Department or City Clerk’s Office for review. On January 16, 2012, @ approximately 7:00 a.m., The Commission attended the 29th Annual Martin Luther King Jr. Payer Breakfast, which was highly attended and outstanding. The Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity Inc. Zeta Rho Lambda Chapter did an excellent job. For our own Vice Chair Willie Jones was the MC of the Prayer Breakfast. On January 18, 2012, Chair Sudler received an E-Mail from the City of Dover’s Human Resource Department indicating that both Intake Forms were sent to the City Solicitor’s Office for review. The City Solicitor advised the City Clerk’s Office to remove both intake forms from tonight’s agenda. It was decided that the intake forms and concerns should be forwarded to Chief James E. Hosfelt Jr. On January 25, 2012, Chair Sudler called Council President Tom Leary to schedule an appointment to discuss recommendation number 1 on Chair’s Self Review of the DHRC. On January 26, 2012, @ approximately 3:30 p.m. Council President Tom Leary and Chairman Roy Sudler, Jr. met to discuss a possible date and time for the DHRC and City Council to sit down together and review the purpose, functions, and responsibilities of the DHRC in accordance with the Powers and Duties Granted by the Mayor and City Council for clearer detailed guidelines. The meeting went well and I am looking forward to establishing a healthier relationship between the Mayor, City Council and the Dover Human Relations Commission. February 2012 Meeting was cancelled 5

On March 3, 2012 @ approximately 2 p.m. at Wilmington University’s Duberstein Admissions Center; 320 North Dupont Highway Newcastle, Delaware, Chair Sudler attended a theatrical play called “GIVE ME THE BALLOT... MY VOICE MATTERS” Featuring the life-story of Fannie Lou Hamer Performed by: Mzuri Moyo and Healing Through Sound Music, Inc. The life-story of Fannie Lou Hamer focused on slavery, the importance of a good education. On March 3, 2012 @ approximately 7 p.m. @ Central Middle School located in Dover, Delaware, Chair Sudler and Commissioner Dr. Kim Warfeild attended the Theatre Play “Torn Between Two Fathers”, which elaborated on a Social Problem that most of our youth and capital school district students face when their mother does not disclose the truth about their child’s biological father. On March 7, 2012, @ approximately 9:16 a.m. Chair Sudler left a voicemail message for Chief Harry Downs of the Delaware State University Police Department to offer him the opportunity to express exactly how imperative it is to cooperate with law enforcement agencies when helping to resolve race hate crimes and other related incidents. On March 12, 2012 @ approximately 11:45 a.m., Chair Sudler spoke with Curtis Coleman who retired from the Capital School District as a Counselor for Dover High School 1980 – 90 in regards to remedies for dealing with emotional and social challenges after being a victim of a race hate crime. Mr. Coleman said that “he would be more than willing to present on that topic”. On March 12, 2012 @ approximately 4:03 p.m., Chair Sudler visited Delaware State University’s Counseling and Public Safety Division see if they would be willing to partner with the City of Dover’s DPD & DHRC to discuss the value of Community and Student Involvement when helping Law Enforcement Agencies in resolving race hate crimes and other related incidents. On March 12, 2012 @ approximately 7:00 p.m. Chair Sudler and Commissioner Fay D. White attended the City of Dover’s Council Meeting. Some of the issues discussed were 1. Housing for Sex Offenders and Zoned Areas being viewed as Concentration Camps 2. Request for Extensions on Time Allotted to Cure City Housing Violation Codes On March 28, 2012, @ approximately 9:24 p.m., the DHRC voted to partner with the Social Action Commission of Mt. Zion A.M.E. Church, Outreach Ministries and the Dover Police Department in an effort to discuss implementing strategies and programs for Residents of Dover to “Stop the Violence and Turn In Unregistered Firearms” to the Dover Police Department without any repercussions for Offenders and Non – Offenders of the Law. 6

On April 27, 2012, @ 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m., Chair Sudler participated in a free training seminar on Investigating & Prosecuting Hate Crimes. The training was excellent and very informative. The training covered an array of topics such as the need for Non-Governmental Organizations to be more involved and aware of the statutes and laws involving hate crimes. [Please review attachment for training outline] 7

8

On May 14, 2012, @ 6:00 p.m. - 6:45 p.m., Chair Sudler was invited by 4th District Councilman David Anderson to attended a press release meeting that focused on a free drug prescription card that provides additional healthcare services at a discounted rate for not only residents of Dover, DE but also, surrounding areas. [Please review attachment for further information] 9

10

On May 14, 2012, @ 7:30 p.m. – 9:30 p.m., Chair Sudler, and Commissioner Fay D. White attended the City Council Meeting to witness and congratulate the new and re-elected council persons for the City of Dover‘s 2012 Council. 31st District House of Representatives – Daryl Scott was present as well. On May 15, 2012, @ 6:00 p.m. – 8:30 p.m., @ Dover Downs 4th Floor; Chair Sudler, attended an award banquet and appreciation gathering for various interfaith and outreach ministries that have made a significant impact on the lives of homeless people and the less fortunate in the Dover Community. One of the recipients was Dr. Kim Warfield of the Dover Human Relations Commission. On May 19, 2012, @ 12:00 – 4:00 p.m., Chair Sudler, Commissioner Dr. Hackett and Commissioner Justina Brewington all participated in the “March for Jesus Christ” which was an excellent well organized event that exemplified diverse religions and people interacting with each other in peace and harmony; it was an excellent event well- orchestrated. On June 18, 2012, @ approximately 8:05 a.m., Chair Sudler received confirmation from Ken Halton Esq. that he would be more than willing to be a panelist and partner with the DHRC at our special forum on sexual orientation, race, and other related incidents of hate crimes. On June 19, 2012, @ approximately 12:23 p.m., The Commission sent out letters to the final three candidates for part-time contractual assistant [See Next Page for Example] 11

June 1, 2012 Dover Human Relations Commission [(302) 736.7008] 15 North Plaza City Hall Dover, DE 19904 ???????????????? [(302) - ] 309 Julia Way Smyrna, DE 19977 RE: Part – Time Contractual Assistant - DHRC Dear ???????????: Please be advised that your resume for Contractual Assistant for the Dover Human Relations Commission has been selected as one of the final three applicants approved. The final three applicants will be required to observe a DHRC meeting and submit their example of minutes to the Commission. The commission will review all applicants’ demonstration of minute taking and make a final selection by July 9, 2012, by 8:00 p.m. Upon your earliest convenience, please contact the City Clerk’s Office to confirm that you’re still interested in providing your contractual assistant services. Thank You Respectfully, Roy Sudler, Jr. DHRC – Chairman 2012 12

On June 27, 2012, @ approximately 8:12 p.m., The Commission approved the final draft for Cessation of Illegal Gang Formation Resolution DHRC – 2012 PROPOSED RESOLUTION & FUNDING A. RESOLUTION: CESSATION OF ILLEGAL GANG FORMATION IN DOVER, DELAWARE ************************************************************************* Whereas; The City of Dover, the State Capital, strives to be a model for all cities in Delaware and the United State. Whereas; The Mayor and City Council have granted Powers and Duties to the Dover Human Relations Commission, Pursuant to Article II. Sec. 58-31. Whereas; Article II Sec. 58-31 titles (2), (4) and (5) charges the DHRC with developing ways to measure and monitor community relations and offer a range of programs and services that will help Dover residents identify and resolve issues of human relations; anticipating, preparing for, and relieving community tensions arising from intergroup conflict.(Code 1981, § 2-16; Ord. of 2-11-2002) Whereas; The Dover Human Relations Commission through open discussion with members of the community and the knowledge of local events has found that gun possession and illegal gang activity is at an all-time high. Whereas; Illegal gangs are a group of individuals consisting of three or more persons whose demoralizing influence, common interest, attitude and graffiti signs significantly contribute to the commission of disruptive behavior and criminal enterprises in the City of Dover. Whereas; The number of illegal gang organizations in Dover and Kent County has increased over the last few years, cultivating an environment of psychic imprisonment, mistrust and fear among citizens of Dover. 13

Whereas; Illegal gang culture and activities have played a significant role in student dropout rates, drug activity and random acts of violence, often leaving innocent bystanders paralyzed and traumatized for life. Whereas; Illegal gang graffiti promoting hate, fear and danger has defaced public and private sector facilities, impeding home and business owner’s rights to market or enjoy their property, without unwelcomed and unauthorized graffiti signs. Therefore, Be it Resolved; That the Residents of Dover, Delaware, the Mayor, City Council, Dover Police Department, Delaware Department of Justice and the Dover Human Relations Commission have observed with dismay the escalation of gang growth and development in our communities and will merge resources and efforts to intensify the pursuit of eliminating illegal gang formation, activities, and communication, including the display of graffiti signs in Dover, Delaware. Be it Further Resolved; That we will accomplish this goal and establish a New Community and Family Involvement Paradigm for Cessation of Illegal Gang Formation by 1. Cleaning up our streets together, showing resistance to illegal gang formation and unwelcomed graffiti signs through unity and clear purpose; 2. Increasing individual’s awareness and accountability for reporting known illegal gang activity and \ or formation in your community. 3. Strengthening parent and family involvement in the childrearing and educational process 4. Implementing and supporting additional intervention and summer programs; and 14

5. Providing additional funding to the Dover Police Department through grants and other resources to establish additional police stations in areas with high volumes of crime to protect Dover residents from being a target of bias-motivated violence in the City of Dover. B). Grant Sample: OJJDP FY 2012 Defending Childhood Resource Center: Improving the Nation’s Response to Children Exposed to Violence. On July 9, 2012 @ approximately 7:30 p.m., Chair Sudler and Commissioner Fay D. White attended the City of Dover’s Council Meeting. During the meeting, there were a few presentations discussed which consisted of the following: 1. Presentation - Lutheran Senior Services of Dover, Inc. - Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) 2. Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report - June 25, 2012 3. Review and Recommendation - Filling Critical Positions - Library 4. FY 2013 Hiring Freeze and Recruitments and 5. Reduced Rates for All-Electric Homes in December, January, and February (Committee Recommended That the Proposal to Reduce Electric Rates for All-electric Homes Be Referred to Staff for Cost Analysis and Review On July 9, 2012, @ approximately 3:10 p.m., Natalie Way contacted the DHRC in regards to a presentation about their Mentor & Leadership Program, which she would like the DHRC to consider partnering with them in the near future. On July 11, 2012, @ approximately 6:00 p.m. Chair Sudler attended the Joint Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee and Election Board Meeting to hear the following proposals A. Results of NAACP Review of Proposed Council District Boundaries and 15

B. Review of Revised Proposed Reapportionments of Council District Boundaries On July 21, 2012, @ approximately 5 p.m., Commission members attended the Barbeque & Bonfire Event for Jesus Christ sponsored by Mt. Zion A.M.E. Church of Dover, DE [Men’s Day Committee 2012], “The event was outstanding,” said Willie Jones, former Acting Chair &Vice- Chairman for the DHRC also, in attendance was Senator Brain Bushweller of Delaware and Daryl Scott of the 31st District House of Representatives for Delaware. This event promoted inclusiveness and fellowship among various interfaith agencies and community leaders. For it was a unique and refreshing event to attend. Also, Mt. Zion’s Men’s Day Committee gave a special thanks to the City of Dover’s Fire Marshal Division and DNREC for authorizing the bonfire activity segment of the celebration. On July 24, 2012, @ approximately 8:30 a.m., Chair Sudler attended a training session on Title 25 Pursuant to the State of Delaware’s Landlord / Tenant Code. Presented by the Law Office of Michael P. Morton, PA mmorton@michaelpmorton.com (302) - 426.1313 Some of the issues that were highlighted consist of the following: 1. Landlords Remedies for Filing Civil Suit against Tenants Who Have Filed Bankruptcy 2. Landlord’s Illegal Ouster of Residents / Tenants from Rental Unit 3. Human Relations Concerns [Race & Handicap Discrimination in Fair Housing Process] 4. Zero-Tolerance Rules & Regulations for Subsidy Housing [HUD] 5. Manufactured Home Requirements and Specifications for the State of Delaware 6. Landlords Remedies for Residents Behavior Deemed Undesirable & Harmful to Community and Unit; and 7. Residents Remedies for Landlord’s Failure to Correct Defective Conditions in the Unit I asked Mr. Morton [Trainer] if he would be willing to partner with the DHRC and conduct a workshop on housing issues and common violations; his response was “yes!” 16

On August 9, 2012, @ approximately 7:10 p.m. a special meeting titled Community and Student Involvement in Resolving Racial and Sexual Orientation Hate Crimes in Communities and Educational Institutions was conducted by the DHRC and went well. For those individuals who did not have an opportunity to attend, there will be a part two of the special forum forthcoming in 2013. 17

COMMUNITY LEADERS & STUDENTS DISCUSSING NEW PARADYMS FOR REPORTING AND DECREASING HATE CRIMES IN DOVER, DELAWARE AND SURROUNDING AREAS Chair Sudler’s Special Forum Opening Statement: The Dover Human Relations Commission is an advisory body to the Mayor and City Council of Dover, Delaware. 18

The Commission is empowered to monitor community relations and measure inter- group conflict. The Commission has a fiduciary duty to be non-bias when seeking conflict remedies for resolving disputes. The Commission’s Powers and Duties are granted by the Mayor and City Council Members pursuant to Chapter 2-Administration, Article 1, Division 6, Section 2-21 of the Dover Code:  Tonight’s Special Forum is called according to ARTICLE II. Sec. 58-31. (1) To promote and develop an environment of fairness and respect among its citizens; and (4) To offer a range of programs and services that will help its residents and neighborhoods prevent and resolve issues of human relations (Code 1981, § 2-16; Ord. of 2-11-2002) The focus of this special forum is to raise the awareness and involvement in resolving and reporting racial and sexual orientation hate crimes in Dover and the State of Delaware. In addition, to review ethical remedies for dealing with emotional, spiritual, and social challenges for victims of bias-motivated violence. The goal of the Dover Human Relations Commission tonight is to help generate new paradigms and methods for eradicating hate crimes through none-controversial and 19

constructive dialogue that stimulates the community, students and law enforcement agencies to build a closer relationship with one another. Please be advised that this special forum is not a debate over the concepts and ideas of same sex marriages or pending cases involving racial tension, but an educational enrichment forum that highlights how to properly disagree with one’s race or sexual orientation without offending or violating another person’s human and constitutional rights. Each presenter will be asked a series of questions by the Chair of the Commission and after all presentations; the forum will be open to the audience for discussion at that time. The Ground rules for this forum are as follows; 1). Audience Members will have 3 minutes to voice their concerns during question \ answer period 2). Citizens who contacted the City Clerk’s Office will speak first 3). All questionnaires and written testimonies are to be submitted to the commission 4). Please reframe from side conversations when citizens are speaking 5). No Pending Cases will be discussed 6). Adjournment @ 9:00 p.m. After the ground rules were read, chair Sudler began with presenter number one, Chief Prosecutor Kent County, DE Ken Haltom Esq. Department of Justice and asked him to briefly define the following topics: 1. Hate Crime Prevention Act – Shepard’s Law? 2. Hate Crime Case Study – Shenandoah [Women being torched for being gay] 3. 42 U.S.C. Code 3631 [Threatened to use force because of race, color etc…] 4. In your opinion, what area of communication is most essential for enhancing the relationship and trust between law enforcement agencies and non- government organizations 20

Chief Prosecutor Kent County, DE Ken Haltom Esq. Department of Justice Response ® to questionnaire: R1). Chief Haltom spoke about how Mathew Shepard was tortured for being gay, which according to Delaware Criminal and Traffic Law Manual Title 11 Code 1304 Section (a) (2) select a victim because of his/her sexual orientation. This misfortunate incident was the reason why it’s called Shepard’s Law R2). Chief Haltom wasn’t to familiar with the case study of Shenandoah, who was also tortured for being gay, so he elaborated on the need for students in schools and community members to report hate crime offenders and incidents to the local law enforcement agencies, and or, city and state officials. R3). Chief Haltom explained Title 42 U.S.C. Code 3631 as a hate crime covered under the State of Delaware’s Title 11 Code 1304 Section (a) (2), selection of victim due to race, which is a hate crime offense. In closing of Chief Haltom’s response to the questions by the chair, a final question was asked, Chief Haltom, in your opinion, what area of communication is most essential for enhancing the relationship and trust between law enforcement agencies and non-government organizations? R4). Chief Haltom acknowledged that there are different avenues to help promote better communication and stronger alliance between law enforcement agencies and the community. He suggested that we work together to break down the barriers that keep individuals from reporting these hate crimes and he encouraged audience members to contact him personally if they were not satisfied with how an investigation was conducted. Chief Haltom stated that he knows that hate crimes occur more often then what is being reported and he feels and understands the frustration that a person can experience, but he believes that forums such as this one would help to promote dialogue and change. In closing, Chief Haltom shared with the commission that out of 15 years of practicing law, this forum was the first of its kind, which he feels is a big change for him, one which he embrace and is eager to be a big part of. The second presenter Chief Harry Downs Jr. of the Delaware State University Police Department was asked the following questions: 1. How does DSU’S Police Department investigate hate crimes? 2. Are students briefed about different hate crimes or other related incidents in freshman orientation? 3. What are some of the consequences and penalties for students who have been involved in hate crime activity on campus? 21

4. In your opinion, how can students and their peers help to eradicate hate crimes on higher education institutions? Chief Harry Downs Jr. Delaware State University Police Department Response ® to questionnaire: R1). Chief Downs indicated that their police department investigates hate crimes the same way any other police department. In incidents such as hate crimes and other related incidents, the student is prosecuted through the university judicial system as well as DSU – Police Department R2). Chief Downs stated that although they don’t cover hate crimes in freshmen orientation they do advocate the need for tolerance and respect among all students regardless of race, religion, color, sexual orientation, national origin, ancestry or disability. R3). Chief Downs indicated that some of the penalties for being convicted for a hate crime at the university included termination of enrollment at DSU, criminal charges, and DSU- judicial charges. Chief Downs also, expressed how appreciative he was to have a great relationship with Dover Police Chief and Delaware State Police Department. R4). Chief Downs believes that students can help their peers after being a victim of a hate crime by encouraging them to seek counseling at DSU Counseling Division or talk with Student Government Body (SGA) to help raise awareness of what could happen to other students on campus. Presenter number four commissioner Vincent A. Petroff, MHR Human Relations Supervisor Division of Human Relations was asked these series of questions: 1. How often does race or sexual orientation impede upon one’s opportunity to get fair housing in the State of Delaware? 2. How does the state human relations commission investigate hate crimes in housing and workplace environment? 3. In your opinion, what strategies or methods could be used to help community leaders and student government bodies identify and prevent potential hate crime activities in communities and higher education institutions 22

Vincent A. Petroff, MHR Human Relations Supervisor Division of Human Relations SHRC Response ® to questionnaire: R1). Commissioner Petroff, explained the state human relations procedure for investigating fair housing violations according to title 6 chapter 4601 (a) of the Fair Housing Codes for the State of Delaware, outlines the policy and jurisdiction of their commission. Commissioner Petroff stated that between 2010 to 2012, there has been 24 fair housing violations, 0 – sexual orientation discrimination claims and 6 hate crime housing incidents. R2). Commissioner Petroff said that in an investigation process for the state human relations commission, there are certain elements of the crime that must be present to determine the identity and severity of the housing violation, so in an effort to prevent potential discrimination in housing they have testers to go out to different communities to see if the potential landlords are exercising discriminatory practices on prospect applicants. For example; if a potential resident decides to look at a neighborhood which they are interested in renting or buying and a current resident states to them that, they may have problems if they move into that neighborhood!, then that statement could be considered an intimidation tactic to deter them from moving in that community. This would be covered under fair housing law title 6 chapter 4619 Prohibition of Intimidation R3). Commissioner Petroff, believes that there should always be a healthy dialogue and relationship between the police community and neighbors to help address and pinpoint concerns and issues through forums and community meetings. Also, he recommended the mediation process to help reflect all party’s issues in a particular situation as a great strategy to diffuse hate crime incidents. Commissioner Petroff, emphasized on students addressing their problems head on and utilizing Law Enforcement Agencies, the Department of Labor and or the State Human Relations Commission @ 1-877-54-Human for additional guidance and support. That concludes segment 1 of the special forum 23

Segment two of the special forum focused on Counselor’s Remedies for Victims of Race and Sexual Orientation Hate Crimes in Dover, Delaware Since two out of the three counselors were unavailable to attend this form, Chair Sudler asked Mr. Ralph Robinson Director of DSU Counseling Division the following questions: 1). How students and community members can positively deal with social and emotional anguish, after encountering or witnessing a race hate incident 2). What are the first components of identifying when you have an emotional problem, who and when to contact them? 3). How can students and family members assist a love one or peer after discovering that they have been a victim of a race hate crime or other related incidents R1). Mr. Robinson started his response to question number one by first thanking the Dover Human Relations commission for inviting him to the forum and acknowledged that sometimes it’s a difficult task to help students deal with emotional and social anguish after being a victim of a race or sexual orientation hate crime and encourages students to talk to someone who will listen to the victim without judging or blaming them for the incident. R2). Mr. Robinson expressed that one of the first components of identifying when you have an emotional problem is when you find yourself overwhelmed with thoughts of revenge or constant obsession over the matter, which interferes with your normal daily function throughout the day. These signs are often followed by physical signs as well, such as headaches, backaches and stomach pains, which are advance signs of severe emotional distress. Mr. Robinson pointed out that there are a multitude of mental health agencies throughout the state of Delaware that can assist students and non-students with dealing with stress anxiety and depression. He also expressed that students should report incidents to the DSU – Police Department and or, the Counseling Division, so that they can vent and receive support with managing their anger in a positive, rational and respectful way, “for it is okay to be upset, but not okay to behave irrational” said Mr. Robinson R3). Mr. Robinson reinforced the important of love ones or peers taking the time out to allow the victim to vent without placing blame on the victim, for they need to know that you value their thoughts about the situation and are listening intensely to what they have to say for their emotional well-being. After the completion of questions being asked and answered by DSU- Director of Counseling Division, Ralph Robinson, the chair introduced to the audience members and panel Mr. Gerald Rocha Community Leader, United Way Employee and Emeritus President of Zeta Rho Lambda Chapter of Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity Incorporated 1906. 24

Mr. Rocha elaborated on the alarming amount of suicides at Polytech High School and the enormous amount of bullying issues among the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community. Mr. Rocha highlighted how imperative it is to develop a gay and straight alliance throughout all schools districts to help students understand and identify the various sexual orientation communities. He also, asked Chief Prosecutor for Kent County Department of Justice Ken Haltom Esq. if the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community was protected under title 11 code 1304 (a) (2) of the Delaware State Criminal and Law Traffic Manual, which Chief Haltom said according to his interpretation of the law, it was covered under the Hate Crime Law. After Chief Haltom answered Mr. Rocha’s question, then chair Sudler asked Mr. Rocha if there have been any students who have exhibit characteristics in their personality that could be viewed as a potential hate crime offender in the future and how does united way address that issue? Mr. Rocha expressed that the faculty as well as the kids may have a hard time identifying hate crime scenarios because of the lack of training they have received in that area, but united way is currently seeking additional training in the near future to help eradicate bullying and hate crimes among all students said Mr. Rocha. After Mr. Rocha’s answer, Chair Sudler introduced to the panel and audience members Mr. Mark Steven Wright Jr. who is currently enrolled at Delaware State University as a freshman. Mr. Wright expressed that he was assaulted by an older Caucasian neighbor who was four years older than he, because his neighbor’s girlfriend commented to him that Mark was a cute guy to be black / African American. Out of anger, the neighbor assaulted him and until this day, Mark believes that the initial investigation of the incident should have been dealt with as a hate crime and not just an offensive touching and assault incident. Also, Mr. Wright shared with the commission that he witnessed an illegal search by a ____ Police Officer, who allegedly searched his father’s vehicle after being told that he did not have permission to search his vehicle. After witnessing that situation, he stated that he feels that law enforcement officials should have harsher penalties for misuse of authority because the general public trust and depends on law enforcement officers to uphold the law and be a positive role model for the community to look up to and not mistrust them. According to Mr. Wright, as a student at DSU he has not personally experienced characteristics that define or identify hate crime activity, but he stated that he wish there was counseling sessions that he could have taken advantage of to help him deal with his frustration and emotions, for he said, “after being a victim of a hate crime at an early age, it has changed him to the point that he has become more alert and quicker to defend himself then before the incident occurred”. 25

After Hearing from Mr. Wright, Chair Sudler thanked Mr. Wright and the entire panelist for taking the time out to come and share with the community and commission imperative knowledge and information that is very relevant to our student government body and our community today. Presentations and Comments from Community Members: At 8:23 p.m. Chair Sudler opened the special forum for discussion between the panelist and audience members. Chair Sudler called on Mr. Cecil Wilson, who contacted the City Clerk’s Office to speak on tonight’s topic, but he was not present. Chair Sudler, then asked other audience members if they were interested in bringing forth any concerns or issues by first stating your name and address for the record. 1). Bill Washington from 8 Mishoe Street Dover, Delaware 19904, thanked 31st District House of Representatives Darryl Scott for helping him with a dilemma he had over a year ago concerning a public works issue in the City of Dover, then he proceeded to brought forth his concern about young adults loitering during late night into the early morning throughout the week and weekend. He believes that the police department should walk through the community sometimes rather than just ridding bye one’s community. For he feels that, the police officers may be able to reach out to the youth and assess the needs of that community more effectively if their presents was more visible on foot then riding by in a police patrol vehicle. 2). Judy Blue of Dover, Delaware asked a question addressed to Mr. Ralph Robinson Director of DSU Counseling Division, in regards to why the campus faculty and staff members of DSU were not reporting any negative changes in the environment on campus? Mr. Robinson’s response indicated that there are faculty members who often call his division to notify them of disruptive behavior or emotional distress displayed buy students on the campus. He said, “That sometimes faculty members just takes a student by the hand and leads them to the counseling division, rather than advising and sending them on there way to seek counseling”. 3). Fred Robinson of Dover, Delaware asked the panel if anyone knew the percentage of progress made 10 years ago in comparison to 2012, has it increased or decreased in the Dover community concerning hate crimes? Chief Prosecutor Ken Haltom responded to the question by saying, “It’s not a crime that is being reported”, then Mr. Fred Robinson asked about the hate crime literature that was disseminated on DSU campus and Chief Haltom indicated that he was unable to discuss that case due to the fact that the case was still under investigation, therefore, he could not comment on the question and continued to reinforce the need for citizens to come out and report these hate crimes for he knows it happens more then what’s being reported! Mr. Robinson ended his questions by stating that he feels that the relationship between city officials, community leaders, and community is very poor in comparison to places he has 26

been, he believes that the city officials need to be more hands on when it comes to their constituents. Mr. Robinson asked, how can we make progress when the community and law enforcement agencies are frustrated with each other? Mr. Rocha responded to Mr. Robinson’s question by stating that he believes that the reason why hate crimes are not being reported is because, whenever someone tries to report a crime as a hate crime, no one wants to deal with the element aspect of the hate crime or its just intentionally overlooked, he feels that we need to continue to keep having forums such as this special forum in order to bring everyone to the table especially, law enforcement agencies in order to orchestrate a positive resolution in the City of Dover. Commission Hackett asked Chief Haltom, what are the outcomes of the cases that have been reported in the City of Dover? Chief Haltom expressed that a lot of times the crime doesn’t have all of the elements in the case to consider it a hate crime. Also, they do additional research in their investigation such as looking at Facebook or twitter to determine if there are elements to help define that crime as a hate crime. Mr. Rocha asked Chief Haltom if they did find something on Facebook or twitter, if that would be a felony or misdemeanor. Chief Haltom responded a misdemeanor! Commissioner Edamatsu asked Chief Haltom, if you have issues such as police bullying during traffic violations is that a hate crime? Chief Haltom response was No! but if a police officer has in his computer data base that a person’s license has been suspended, then they are supposed to arrest that individual and take them to jail. For he knows that sometimes Delaware Motor Vehicle Department may not have changed the information or drop the suspended license notice within a certain time period, which could lead to an arrest, but the Department of Justice is aware of those problems and is sensitive to that situation. Commissioner White expressed that she knows that the Delaware Criminal Codes are often changed on a monthly or annual basis and what she wants to know is, how often is the public made aware of these changes and how are they being notified? Chief Haltom response was these changes are often posted on line for the public’s review. Representative Darryl Scott commented on the fact that there are representatives that monitor the process of passing the law and sometimes may not do as an effective job communicating that to the public, but that is something that they are currently trying to improve. Commissioner White expressed that DSU is in the Dover community and she feels that constituents of Dover should be allowed to speak and express any and all concerns that they may have in regards to their safety and their love one’s safety. Commissioner Warfeild asked Chief Haltom, How quickly are they changing the Delaware Criminal Codes once they have been passed? 27

Chief Haltom stated that the law is in effect upon the governor signing of the law. He feels that a good way to monitor that process is through your local representatives and special forums such as this one, where you learn more about upcoming changes and understand how to follow these changes through the General Assembly Web-Site. Mr. Robinson was called back to the podium to express that for the record, he is not hear to be controversial but to be a part of a positive change and dialogue that is much needed in the City of Dover. Commissioner Hackett stated that she would like to see a better and closer relationship between the public and the police officers, because some people don’t get there mail all the time and are unaware that they are in noncompliance of the Delaware Motor Vehicle Code. Chief Haltom reinforced to Commissioner Hackett that they are aware of that and often try to work with them as much as legally possible. 31st District Representative Darryl Scott asked DSU – Police Chief Harry Downs Jr. how they investigate similar offenses? Chief Downs indicated that they deal with cases on an individual basis, and if someone feels as though they have been treated unfairly, then strongly recommends that they seek additional help from a higher level of command. Chief Downs also expressed that he agrees with Chief Haltom that the public needs to help report and resolve hate crimes in their community, because usually, the public has more information about the incident then the police department has, for recommends that the community work closer with the police in quest of strengthening our community, reporting and eradicating not just hate crimes, but all forms of crime in one’s community. Commissioner Dawn Allen-Pyne expressed that the Police Department needs to reach out to the community and let them know what kind of steps have been taken to strengthen their relationship and trust factor between both parties. Commissioner Hackett stated that we need to make sure that all communities are given the same respect and policed the same way or it could be perceived as discrimination based on neglect. Commissioner Edamatsu feels that we all have to do a better job in understanding, communicating and working together to make our Dover community a better place for people to reside. Chair Sudler asked the panel if there has been any talk about requiring hate crime offenders to register like sex offenders with the police department, so that community members would be made aware of individuals who are members of hate crime organizations in their community. The response from Chief Haltom was no! 28

In closing of the forum, Chair Sudler thanked the Department of Justice for the State of Delaware, the State Human Relations Commission, Delaware State University’s Police Department, Delaware State University’s Counseling Division, Students and Community Leaders for participating in tonight’s special forum and encouraged them to come back for part two of the forum, which is forthcoming in 2013. On September 27, 2012, @ approximately 7:00 p.m. The Commission conducted an Outreach Meeting under the leadership of Community Program’s Chair and Vice-Chair of the DHRC, Dawn Allen Pyne and also Fay D. White who helped secure and coordinate the outreach meeting. On September 27, 2012, @ approximately 9:30 p.m. Chair Sudler was contacted by Vice- Chair Dawn Allen Pyne and complaintee Mr. Henry Fordham, in regards to the events that led up to an attempted murder and castration by hanging at Silver-lake Recreational Park located in Dover, Delaware. On September 28, 2012, Chair Sudler scheduled a Roundtable Meeting for October 5, 2012, with Henry Fordham, State Human Relations Commission, Mayor, City Council President, 4th District Councilmen, 31st District House of Representative the Department of Justice and Dover Human Relations Commission to hear the events that allegedly took place on September 21, 2012. [Please see roundtable agenda and city solicitor’s opinion] 29

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ROUNDTABLE MEETING OCTOBER 5, 2012 CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM ************************************************************************* Agenda 1. Call to Order 2. Prayer 3. Purpose of Roundtable 4. Goal of Roundtable 5. Introduction of Officials 6. Summary of Resident’s Statement to DHRC 7. Mr. Henry Fordham’s Testimony 8. Review of Alleged Criminal Elements 9. Roundtable Discussion 10. Adjournment ________________________________________________________________________ 3. Purpose of Roundtable: The purpose of the Dover Human Relations Commission’s Roundtable is to establish an environment conducive for residents and community leaders to report sever acts of undesirable behavior and customer service that may place extreme emotional distress on residents of Dover, without fear of retaliatory acts exercised upon them. 4. Goal of Roundtable: The goal of the roundtable is to provide residents and community leaders with an opportunity to voice their emergency concerns to city, state or federal officials in an effort to help eradicate distress and tension between two or more opposing parties. We will meet this goal by providing resources and information that will contribute to decreasing racial tension and emotional distress after being a victim of bias-motivated acts of violence. In addition, to simply advocate a higher quality of living and communication between the City of Dover officials and all constituents of Dover, Delaware. 30

5. Introduction of Officials: 6. Resident’s Statement: On September 27, 2012, @ 9:17 p.m., Mr. Henry Fordham reported to the Dover Human Relations Commission’s Chair [Roy Sudler, Jr.] that on September 21, 2012, he was approached by two Caucasian males who befriended him earlier that day through a general conversation about the origin and practices of Muslim Religion. Later on that evening, Mr. Fordham met with the two Caucasian males to continue their conversation. After getting into the vehicle of the two Caucasian males, he then was held gun-point and taken to Silver Lake Recreational Park located in Dover, Delaware. During the time he was unlawfully held captive against his will; Mr. Fordham experienced derogatory racial slurs, being pistol-whipped, hung and attempted murder and castration and survived. Mr. Fordham stated that, “He tried to report the incident to various law enforcement agencies and was denied the opportunity to make an official hate crime complaint”. In addition, according to Mr. Fordham, he was advised by more than one law enforcement agencies, that he would be arrested for false report if he continued to pursue filing an incident report of this nature”. The Dover Human Relations Commission has been requested by Mr. Fordham to be a catalyst \ mediator in the process of helping him to file an official complaint with the proper law enforcement agency without fear of retaliatory acts or undue distress sanctioned upon him. Mr. Fordham, brought forth his concern to the Dover Human Relations Commission in an effort to make sure that his human and civil rights were not being violated and to simply give testimony as to the events that led up to his abduction on September 21, 2012. 31

8. Alleged Elements in Mr. Henry Fordham’s Claim Pursuant to Delaware’s Criminal & Traffic Manual ************************************************************************************ Title 11 Sections: 513. Conspiracy in the first degree; class E felony. 604. Reckless endangerment in the first degree; class E felony. 782. Unlawful imprisonment in the first degree; class G felony. 783A. (4) Kidnapping in the first degree; class B felony. 1244. (a) - (4) Hindering prosecution; class A misdemeanor. 1245. Falsely reporting an incident; class A misdemeanor. 1301. (1) (a) Disorderly conduct; unclassified misdemeanor. 1304. (a) (1-2) Hate Crimes; class G felony. 1447. Possession of a deadly weapon during commission of a felony; class B felony. Recommendation from Chair of DHRC as of 9/27/2012 to Mr. Henry Fordham: 1. Seek counseling immediately for emotional distress and thoughts of irrational retaliatory behavior 2. Speak with designated District City Council Representative 3. Document the events that took place in sequence as quickly as possible 4. Roundtable / Testimony On November 5, 2012, the Commission received a complaint from Mr. Eshed Alston, in reference to the Chair of DHRC not doing enough to address the concerns of the community in regards to the alleged Dover lynching claim and other issues concerning minorities [Please see complaint document] 32

33

On November 16, 2012, Chair Sudler attended a roundtable discussion with 4th District Candidate Bernhard A. Greenfield in reference to constituent’s concerns and issues at Mishoe Towers, Inc. located in Dover, Delaware On November 17, 2012, Chair Sudler attended a roundtable discussion in regards to the 4th District Candidate Rev. Wallace Dixon position concerning constituent’s concerns and issues for the 4th District at Mishoe Towers, Inc. located in Dover, Delaware On November 26, 2012 @ 10:55 a.m., Chair Sudler received an E-mail from Councilmen David Anderson of the 4th District, which reference his opinion about the status of Mr. Henry Fordham’s claim. [Please see E-mail] FW: Dover Human Relations Commission - Intake Form and Meeting to Discuss Sent By: Traci McDowellOn:Oct 10/03/12 8:32 AM To: roysudlerjr@comcast.net Cc: "Thomas J. Leary" <councilmanleary@comcast.net>; "Carey Sr., Carleton" <ccarey@dover.de.us>; "Bill Hare" <billh2323@comcast.net>; "David Anderson" <davidlevianderson@gmail.com>; "James Hosfelt" <james.hosfelt@cj.state.de.us>; "Kim Warfield (apostlekim1@verizon.net)" <apostlekim1@verizon.net>; "City Clerks Office" <CityClerk@dover.de.us>; Hollie Ford Chairman Mr. Sudler: Please see City Solicitor Rodriguez' opinion below regarding the Roundtable discussion. In light of the opinion, Mr. Leary has advised that the scheduling of this meeting should not proceed. City Solicitor Rodriguez has suggested that the complainant be directed to speak with the State Human Relations Commission or the Attorney General's Office. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you, Traci A. McDowell, CMC City Clerk Oct 2012 – Strange Fruit of Delaware: 2012 Lynchings 34

-----Original Message----- From: Nick Rodriguez [mailto:nrodriguez@schmittrod.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 5:28 PM To: Stein, Jody Cc: William Pepper Subject: Re: Dover Human Relations Commission - Intake Form and Meeting to Discuss Jody, We recommend that the City and DHRC stay out of this matter completely. This is a criminal accusation and may result in criminal charges. Secondly the City could be sued for inadequate security in a civil lawsuit. Further would be criminal concerns of false complaints. This is our recommendation based upon the very limited information that has been submitted to us at the present time. Nick Rodriguez On Oct 2, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Stein, Jody wrote: Sent By: davidlevianderson@gmail.comOn:Nov 11/26/12 10:55 AM To: "Tom Leary" <tlau72@yahoo.com>; "Sean Lynn" <slynn@delawarelaw.com>; "Kim Warfield" <apostlekim1@verizon.net>; "Roy Sudler" <roysudlerjr@comcast.net>; "Roxie Smiley-" <rs82067@gmail.com>; "Gregory Gordon" <revgegordon@yahoo.com>; "Jeannie Anderson" <jeannielynna@msn.com>; ccarey@dover.de.us; Traci McDowell http://waronthehorizon.com/site/?p=3836 [Review Website] No wonder, the one gentleman was concerned. Dr. Issa is traveling in radical company. Combine this with private conversations in which he accused me of selling out to the white power establishment for saying a suicide is sometimes just a suicide. I am seeing a picture that I think is dangerous. It was a huge mistake to prevent the Human Relations commission roundtable with the families. Intentions were pure, but it was the outcome most needed by the radicals who are exploiting then exaggerating legitimate concerns. We do need to think about addressing this insidious issue without fueling it. Sent from my HTC One™ S on T-Mobile. America’s First Nationwide 4G Network. 35

The December 2012 meeting was cancelled In conclusion of the year 2012, the Dover Human Relations Commission has received a total of three intake forms, which the intake form according to City Solicitor Nick Rodriguez and the City of Dover’s Clerk Office are not the purview of the DHRC. Therefore, the Commission was instructed to refer these Intake Forms to other agencies for investigation: DHRC - INTAKE FORM TOPICS: 1. 3/5 Index Cards that were disseminated on the streets of Down - Town Dover and Delaware State University’s Campus, which displayed an image of a person of color hanging by a rope tied to his or her’s neck from a tree with a racial slur statement saying, “Cleaning Up New Street One Nigger at a Time” [January 2012] 2. Alleged Police Brutality Complaint against the Dover Police Department involving a shooting / homicide that took place on New Street of Dover, Delaware and one of the investigating officers allegedly exercised unnecessary force by punching a citizen of Dover in the face repeatedly during the process of investigating a shooting that was called in by the alleged victim and his mother who witnessed the crime and the shooter and ended up being arrested themselves”. The witness to the alleged police brutality assault feared for his or her’s safety and chose not to report the incident to Industrial Affairs of Dover Police Department and decided to report the incident to the Dover Human Relations Commission out of concern for retaliatory actions by officers of the Dover Police Department, who allegedly committed this violent offense against a citizen of Dover. [January 2012] 3. Silver-Lake Recreational Park in Dover, DE [ Alleged Lynching Report] On September 27, 2012, @ 9:17 p.m., Mr. Henry Fordham reported to the Dover Human Relations Commission’s Chair [Roy Sudler, Jr.] that on September 21, 2012, he was approached by two Caucasian males who befriended him earlier that day through 36

a general conversation about the origin and practices of Muslim Religion. Later on that evening, Mr. Fordham met with the two Caucasian males to continue their conversation. After getting into the vehicle of the two Caucasian males, he then was held gun-point and taken to Silver Lake Recreational Park located in Dover, Delaware. During the time he was unlawfully held captive against his will; Mr. Fordham experienced derogatory racial slurs, being pistol-whipped, hung and attempted murder and castration and survived. Mr. Fordham stated that, “He tried to report the incident to various law enforcement agencies and was denied the opportunity to make an official hate crime complaint”. In addition, according to Mr. Fordham, he was advised by more than one law enforcement agencies, that he would be arrested for false report if he continued to pursue filing an incident report of this nature”. The Dover Human Relations Commission has been requested by Mr. Fordham to be a catalyst \ mediator in the process of helping him to file an official complaint with the proper law enforcement agency without fear of retaliatory acts or undue distress sanctioned upon him. Mr. Fordham, brought forth his concern to the Dover Human Relations Commission in an effort to make sure that his human and civil rights were not being violated and to simply give testimony as to the events that led up to his abduction on September 21, 2012. DHRC - CONCERNS: The Dover Human Relations Commission is very concerned about the amount of intake forms that indicate racial tension in the City of Dover being deferred out to other agencies for investigation. Pursuant to Chapter 2 – Administrative, Article I, Division 6, Section 2 – 21 and Article II Section 58 – 31 Titled Human Relations Commission’s Purpose; the Commission has been granted the Powers and Duties to investigate claims of unfair treatment and develop ways to monitor intergroup conflict among all segments of the City of Dover. The ambiguity of our purpose and constant deferrals of intake complaint forms followed by constant ostracism from constituents of Dover regarding the Commission’s lack of investigating official intake complaint forms have unfortunately, contributed significantly to the resignation of current and previous commission members, especially after hearing the nature and 37

urgency of resident’s concerns and not being able to investigate the merit of the complaint. DHRC - CHAIR’S RECOMMENDATION: In an effort to avoid further resignations of current and future Commission Members, it is my recommendation, as Chairman of the Dover Human Relations Commission, that the Mayor and City Council of Dover, Delaware, conduct a special meeting with the Dover Human Relations Commission to interpret Chapter 2 – Administrative, Article I, Division 6, Section 2 – 21 of the Dover Code and Article II. Human Relations Commission, Sec. 58-31. Purpose: to mitigate or eradicate current and future Commission Member’s concerns and feelings of not fulfilling their duties as Commissioners who advocate Human and Civil Rights for all segments of Dover, Delaware. As the year 2013 approaches, the Dover Human Relations Commission looks forward to continuing to help eradicate racial tension, unfair-treatment, and intergroup conflict, while advocating the philosophy of inclusiveness among all segments of Dover, Delaware. On behalf of the Dover Human Relations Commission, we thank the Mayor and Dover City Council Members for appointing each and every one of us to serve the Dover Community in such an imperative and essential way. Dated: _____________________ Submitted By: _____________________________________________________ Mr. Roy Sudler, Jr. – Chairman Dover Human Relations Commission 38

Carvel Building Wilmington: (302) 577-5050 820 N. French Street Dover: (302) 739-4567 Wilmington, Delaware Georgetown: (302) 856-5331 :State of Delaware Human Relations Commission MEETING AGENDA "Community Harmony" -TUESDAY~ MAY 15, 2001 /, U. OF D. PARADEE BLDG, DOVER, DE I. Open Prayer/Silent Meditation IL Introduction III. Purpose of Meeting • Begin a dialog and develop objectives to restore and rebuild our community together with all of you and the citizens of Dover IV. Highlights of May 1st Meeting v. Strategies and Objectives VI. Plan of Action • Steps and Timeframes VII. Closing • Follow-up Meetings

DOVER COMMUNITY MEETING MINUTES The Delaware Human Relations Commission held a meeting on June 6, 2001 at the University of Delaware, Paradee Building, Route 113 and Bay Road, Dover, Delaware. The meeting was called to order by the Director of the Division of Human Relations, Juana Fuentes-Bowles. Commissioner David Hill was unable to attend the meeting due to illness. Those present: Director of the Division of Human Relations, Juana Fuentes-Bowles, Mayor James Hutchinson, Lt. Keith O'Connell, Roy Sudler, Jr. Evangelist Shirley Caldwell, Pastor Richard Avant, Bishop Marion Lott, Pastor William Fitzhugh, Councilpersons, John Pitts and Gene Ruane, Elder W.R. Dixon, Elder Paul Caldwell, Bridget Avant and Ray (FAMBCF). The meeting opened with an introduction of the people present. The meeting was a continuation from the last meeting (May 15, 2001) on the development of strategies and objectives to restore and rebuild the Dover Community. The highlights of the May 15 meeting were discussed. The issues were prioritized as follows: Issues (1) Concern of Citizens (2) How citizens are viewed by local officials (3) How citizens view the Police Department (4) Isolation (5) Dover Police Department (Recruitment, promotions, retention, new hires, etc.) (6) Role of the Capital School District (7) Media Discussion took place on different strategies and objectives that can be placed under some of the issues. Those Strategies and objectives were as follows: Strategies and Objectives • How to get citizens involved (i.e. clergy) • Neighborhood watch program • Talk with citizens • Identify communities • Identify representation from those communities • Communication • Meetings being conducted (i.e. neighborhoods) • Council to hold district meetings • Hold community meetings ·• Mobilization of a Task Force • Develop a Citizen Concern Board

• Information meetings held by identified entities • Establish community organizations • Hold Block Parties • Citizen Police Academy • Opportunities • Partner with Groups • Develop Diversity Programs • Develop Civic Associations • Invite community to a roundtable All members present were asked to look at some of the strategies that were identified and place them under an issue that was identified, and to develop other strategies for the identified issues. Discussion took place in identifying communities within Dover that are not organized. Some that were mentioned are: Capital Green, Manchester Square, Liberty Court, Whatcoat, Simmon Circle and Schoolview. Roy Mishoe Sudler introduced information entitled "Meeting Agenda for the NAACP reference to the State of Delaware, Division of Human Relations Commission" to the group. It was decided by the group to review the infonµation for discussion at the next meeting. (Attached) The group agreed to invite Diane Mitchum, U.S. Department of Justice at the next meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m .. The next meeting is scheduled for June 19 at 6:30 p.m.

Dover Community Meeting Minutes Page Two Involvement from the Clergy: Participation from all clergy. The group felt that a plan of action should be developed before the end of the 2001 school year. From those Highlights of the May 1, 2001 meeting, seven issues were developed: (1) Isolation (2) How citizens are viewed by local officials; i.e. stereotyping, race profiling, labeling. (3) Media (4) Dover Police Department Recruitment, Promotion, Retention of minority group members (5) How citizens view police, i.e. stereotyping, fear, advocacy role. (6) Capitol School District role Recruitment of minority teachers and administrators, school board issues. Ratio of minority students vs. minority teachers and administration (7) The anger of citizens Several strategies were discussed; citizen police academy, opportunities, hold council meetings in council members districts, partner with groups, proactive approaches, develop diversity programs, community league, community review boards, civic association involvement, partner with multi-housing units and their managers, invite the community to the roundtable. The group agreed with the issues discussed and a ranking should take place to address immediate issues first and respectively followed. They further discussed inviting other members to the table. The group felt that once the issues have been identified and agreed upon, strategies and objectives should be developed for implementation. All members present were asked to prioritize the issues and be prepared to talk about strategies and objectives for each issue by next meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m.. The next meeting is scheduled for June 6, 2001 at 6:30 p.m. at University of Delaware, Paradee Building, Route 113 and Bay Road, Dover, Delaware.

MEETING AGENDA FOR THE NAACP IN REFERENCE TO THE STATE OF DELAWARE DIVISION HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, JUNE 6, 2001 LOCATION: U. OF D. PARADEE BLDG. DOVER DELAWARE OFFICIAL QUESTIONS SUBMITTED TO THE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION & DISTINGUISHING COLLEAGUE'S FROM THE NAACP. PURPOSE: TO PROJECT A REALISTIC TIME FRAME WHICH INDICATES WHEN EACH OF THESE ISSUES BEING PRIORITIZED WILL BE OPEN TO THE COMMUNITY FOR IMPUTE. QUESTION #{JI WHEN WILL WE ESTABLISH A FORUM THAT IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC IN REFERENCE TO STRATEGIES BEING IMPLEMENTED & PRIORITIZED? {ANSWER}

Carvel Building Wilmington: (302) 577-5050 820 N. French Street Dover: (302) 739-4567 Wilmington, Delaware Georgetown: (302) 856-5331 State of Delaware Human Relations Commission June 12, 2001 Mr. Roy Sudler, Jr. NAACP 130 Brandywine Drive Meadows Dover, DE 19904 Dear Mr. Sudler, Jr.: Enclosed please find the minutes from the June 6, 2001 meeting. Please review and be prepared to discuss strategies and objectives for each of the issues that were developed by the group. Our next meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 19, 2001 at 6:30 P.M., at DelDot, Rt. #113 & Bay Road, Dover, DE 19901. The meeting will be held in the New Castle Conference Room. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at 739-4567. Sincerely, ~/-'{~_.j,,_.,,.f,U -~(Jp Juana Fuentes-Bowles, Director Division of Human Relations JFB:sp Xe: Harriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State Al Carter, Deputy Principal Assistant David Hill, Commissioner Calvin Christopher, Commission Chairperson

DOVER COMMUNITY MEETING MINUTES The Delaware Human Relations Commission held a meeting on May 15, 2001 at the University of Delaware ParadeeJ3uilding, Route 113 and Bay Road, Dover, Delaware. The meeting was called to order by Commissioner David W. Hill at 6:45 p.m. Those present were: Commissioner David Hill, Director of the Human Relations Office, Juana Fuentes-Bowles, Councilpersons, Carleton Carey, Sr., William McGlumphy, John Pitts, Robert Ritter, Eugene Ruane, Stephen Speed, William Truitt, Charles Weller, President of Kent County NAACP, Cecil Wilson, Bishop Marion Lott, Mayor James Hutchinson, Chief of Police designees, Lt. Keith O'Connell and Capt. Ray Taraill, NAACP Community Activist, Travis Mishoe Sudler and NAACP Chair of Labor, Ray Sudler, Jr. The purpose of the meeting was to begin a dialogue and develop objectives to restore and rebuild the community together with all citizens of Dover. Highlights of the May 1st meeting was discussed. Those highlights were as follows: Partnership: Partnering with other entities to establish a working relationship (Delaware State Housing Authority, community leaders, Government Officials, Attorney General Office, U.S. Department of Justice, HUD, Delaware State Housing Authority, Wesley College, Delaware Technical and Community College, Civic Organizations and Law Enforcement). Media Issues: How they can approach the Media. How the media portrays races and cultures. How media self-evaluates news. Education/Community Outreach: Feedback from citizens -Develop ways to dialogue with community leaders; ways to market the City of Dover, holding public meetings and how to be proactive vs. reactive approaches. Citizen Police Academv: How the academy functions. How it can be a resource to the community.

QUESTION #(21 WHAT IS THE LONG RANGE GOAL OF THE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION?????????????????? {ANSWER} OFFICIAL NOTATION: PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE {NAACP} WOULD LIKE TO WORK CONCLUSIVELY WITH THE COMMUNITY AND NOT A SEGMENT OF HIGHER OFFICIALS. AS OF JULY 6, 2001 THE NAACP WILL NOT COMMIT TO ANY 1YPE OF PAR1NERSHIP WITH VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS. ALSO, ANY ATTEPT TO DISCUSS THE REGINALD HANNA CASE WILL CAUSE THE NAACP TO REMOVE THEMSELVES FROM THE PANEL. ON BEHALF OF THE NAACP: ROY MISHOE SUDLER ALONG WITH TRAVIS MISHOE SUDLER WILL REPRESENT THE NAACP TODAY UULY 6, 2001]

DHRC 2012 Chairman's Report Submitted by: Roy Sudler, Jr. April 5, 2012 Submitted to: Legislative, Finance & Administration Committee ******************************************************************************* As an update to Chair Sudler's Self-Review and Recommendations for how the DHRC could operate more effectively within the purview of its mission statement, the Commission has moved forward towards implementing three out of the eight recommendations accepted and approved by the Legislative, Finance & Andministration Committee. R-(1). That an in-depth discussion be held with city Council and the DHRC to clarify the intended goals and expectations of the Commission, as described in (Code 1981, & 2-20; Ord. of 2-11-2002). On January 26, 2012,@ approximately 3:30 p.m. Council President Tom Leary and I met to discuss a possible date and time for the DHRC and City Council to sit down together and review the purpose, functions, and responsibilities of the DHRC in accordance with the Powers and Duties Granted by the Mayor and City Council for clearer detailed guidelines. The meeting went well and I am looking forward to establishing a healthier relationship between the Mayor, City Council and the Dover Human Relations Commission. R-(4). That the DHRC foster more collaborative relationships /Partnerships with other appropriate groups / organizations in working to accomplish the Commission's objectives (i.e., faith-based groups, YMCA, Dover Police, NAACP, etc). On March 12, 2012,@ approximately 4:03 p.m., I visited Delaware State University's Counseling and Public Safety Division to see if they would be willing to partner with the City of Dover's DPD & DHRC to discuss the value of Community and Student Involvement when helping Law Enforcement Agencies in Resolving Race Hate Crimes and Other Related Incidents. On March 28, 2012,@ approximately 9:24 p.m., the DHRC voted to partner with the So,cial Action Commission of Mt. Zion A.M.E. Church, Outreach Ministries and the Dover Police Department in an effort to discuss implementing strategies and programs for Residents of Dover to "Stop the Violence and Turn In Unregistered Firearms" to the Dover Police Department without any repercussions for Offenders and Non - Offenders of the Law. R-(6). That the City Solicitor conducts a workshop for DHRC Member's, on "How to Interpret the DHRC Powers, Duties and City Codes Granted by the Mayor & City CowlCil".

DHRC 2012 Chairman's Report Submitted by: Roy Sudler, Jr. Mr. Rodriguez [City Solicitor] April 12, 2012 City of Dover RE: DHRC - Workshop on Powers & Fiduciary Duties On January 25, 2012,@ approximately 7:47 p.m. the DHRC voted to obtain a better understanding as to why the Intake Form submitted by Dr. Joe Burden Jr. concerning the 3/5 Racial Slur Index Cards were removed from February's Agenda 2012. In an effort to help the DHRC stay within its purview with clearer operational procedures, the Commission would like to conduct a workshop under your leadership on the Powers and Duties of the Commission granted by the Mayor and City Council of Dover, Delaware. Below are two sections that the commission would like for you to discuss first upon your earliest convenience. We thank you in advance for assisting us and we look forward to working closer with You, Mayor, and City Council of Dover, Delaware. ARTICLE II. HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Sec. 58-31. Purpose. (2) Monitoring. Develop ways to measure and monitor community relations, particularly those that are sources of intergroup conflict; Sec. 58-33. Organization; quorum; meetings; rules of procedure; limitation of functions; agreements; compensation; legal counsel; reports. (e) Functions limited. The commission shall not involve itself in activities or functions already assigned by law or decree to other governmental bodies At this time, that will conclude Chair Sudler's Update Report on Recommendations Implemented and Approved by the Legislative, Administrative & Finance Committee.

DOVER IIDMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION - 2011 Chairman's Review and Recommendations Submitted by: Roy Sudler, Jr. 1/6/2012 *****************************************1tlll++*************************************** As a summary and follow up to the DHRC - 2011 Annual Report which was submitted December 21, 2011, the following self-review and recommendations are being offered for consideration as to how the DHRC could operate more effectively within the purview of its mission. Stated in the City's code, Article II, Sec. 58-31, the DHRC was established to effectively help the City meet the following needs: (1) The need for an environment of fairness and respect among its citizens; (2) The need for ways to effectively measure and monitor community relations, particularly those that are sources of intergroup conflict; (3) The need for all segments of the community to understand and appreciate positive intergroup relations; (4) The need for programs and services to help prevent and resolve community issues and improve human relations; and (5) The need for developing ways of anticipating, preparing for, and relieving community tensions arising from intergroup conflict. Recognizing that the above needs have been long-term and deep-rooted, the DHRC realizes that there are no "ready-made, quick fixes," and solutions cannot be accomplished by the DHRC alone. The key words in our stated purpose are "to help the City." With that thought in mind, I offer th.e following observations and recommendations. Summaty; The Commission has hosted special meetings and forums during the year in response to complaints and disruptive incidences within the Dover community. These meetings were conducted in an open and non-threatening manner, with the intention of objectively reviewing the circumstances and handling of various situations. The Commission has often asked questions and sought information from the Dover Police Department and others in an effort to determine whether the handling of situations appeared to treat everyone fairly, and in a manner which helped to create an environment of fairness, dignity and respect. The Commission has also collaborated with other community agencies, organizations, City and State officials in seeking ways of addressing identified needs and concerns regarding human relations and relieving tensions arising from intergroup conflict within the City. An example of this was displayed when the DHRC was effectively used as a mediator in

resolving an alleged unfair treatment claim against the City's Housing Code Enforcement Division. The Commission was able to reflect the individual's concerns while conveying to him how important it was for him to be in compliance with the codes. Today, both parties are working together in an effort to permanently resolve this matter. RecQmmendations: (1) That an in-depth discussion be held with City Council and the DHRC to clarify the intended goals and expectations of the Commission, as described in (Code 1981, & 2-20; Ord. of 2- 11-2002). This should insure that each group has the same understanding of the purpose, functions, responsibilities, and expectations of the Commission. As Councilwoman, Sophia Russell stated, "the Dov-er Human Relations Commission would function more effectively through clearer detailed guidelines and procedures for the Commission." (2) That the DHRC work with the Mayor's Office in developing detailed written guidelines and operational procedures for exercising and accomplishing the Commission's seven (1) Powers and Duties, as delineated in Sec. 58-36. Perhaps this should include definitions, explanations, clarifications of "functions limited," ways to detennine when/what they are, and even protocol for soliciting/receiving other funds. (3) That a youth commissioner be added to the Commission. This would help to expand the Commission's inclusion of representation from the entire community. It could also help with developing ways to measure and monitor community relations. (4) That the DHRC foster more collaborative relationships/partnerships with other appropriate groups/ organizations in working to accomplish the Commission's objectives (i.e., faith.- based groups, YMCA, Dover Police, NAACP, etc). (5) That the DHRC be granted authorization to receive training for investigating and monitoring claims of unfair treatment, exclusion, and racial tension in accordance with its purpose, responsibilities, and functions. Other suggested trainings would include the Mediation Process by the Center of Community Justice in an effort to help diffuse/ eradicate conflicts. (6) That the City Solicitor conducts a workshop for DHRC members On "How to Interpret the DHRC Powers, Duties, and City Codes." This should help commission members to function more effectively within the guidelines of the DHRC's purpose. (1) That the DHRC and City Council work together to develop and approve a Long-range Strategic Plan and Annual Operational Plan for the DHRC. This would greatly enhance the Commission's and City's ability to monitor, measure, and evaluate effectiveness of the City and the Commission in meeting its five (5) stated needs. (8) That professional training be provided for the DHRC in "How to Develop a Strategic Plan."

1 [gJ Being a Prepared Tenant in Delaware Presented by the Law Office of Michael P. Morton, PA mmQOQO@miohaelpmorton.com 302-426-1313 2 ro I The Landlord Tenant Code • The operative code under which all Delaware residential landlord tenant relationships operate is found In the Delaware Code in Tltle 25, Property, Residential Landlord Tenant Code. • 25 Del. Code. §5101-§5718 • http://deloode.delaware.gov/ - Click on Title 25· F'roperty go to 5101 3 Lg) Manufactured Home Owiers and Commuiity owners Act • This code regul~es all rentals of lots for the placement of manufactured homes in Delaware, • The Manufactured Home Communitias act DOES NOT govern th• rental of manufacture home$, only the rental of the lot. So if a tenant Is renting the lot and the home, then two code apply. • 215 Del. Code § 7001-7025. • http://delCOde.delaware.gov/ - Ciiek on Trtle 25.- Property then go to 7001 et nq 4 ] g] Local Codes • Wllmlngton Code, Chapter 34 • NCC Code, BOCA National Property Maintenance Code Comp1111nt 111•ner'atlld compllance vl•IW - Tim.nhl Rlgtrt. Guld• - Yearly ,.g11tr11tlon - Protocol fOr Random ln11P41etlon1 - Enfun:ement or penalty HCllOll• • City of Newark s!o l Landlord as defined in Section 5141 • The owner, ln11or or1ub·IMtorofth11 nmtlll unltortht proptlty OfwhlC.h It la a p•rt•nd, h1 ICldltlort, •hllll 111t1an •ny person •uthorizltd to t•trclH Illy Hpact of th a m•n•nemont of Ult premlaae, lncludl~ •ny ~rso11 who, directly or lndlrectly, rec;olvo1 r•ntt or any part thenof Dlh•rthan Ha bOna fid11 purcha1111r .nd wno hu no obligation to delvtr tha whote of 1uch 1'1M)8ip&9 to another perton: or • A11ir peraon hllld out by any landlord H th• epproprllde p•rty to •cctpt P•rfonn•nce, whllthar •11ch Ptf'IOll It a landlord or nat; or • Any pa111on wltll vmom VII tenant nonnally dealt n a landlord; or • Any perton to whom tha pe111on 11p.clfled In 1u11pat.1graph11 b. and c. of thl• paragraph ni dlractly or ultlmawly l'HPOJltlble. 6 l.oJ Landlord as defined in Section 7003 • "Landlord'' or "community owner" means the owner of 2 or more manufactured home lob offered for rent. It includes a lessor, sub-lessor, pa.111. owner or receiver of 2 or more manufactured home lots offered for rent, as well as any person, other than a lender not In possession, who directly or lndlrecdy receives rents for 2 or more manufactured home lots offered for rent and who has no obligation to deliver such rents to another person. 1 iol Tenant • The Rtsldentlal Code defines Tenant as follows: _ "Tenant" •hllll ma•n • ptrton 1mltlld under a ... rttal agr1111ment to occupy • rental unit to tha 11xc=1111lon Of othtr., and th• word "ten•nr" 111•11 lnclud• 111 occupant Of •my pnimillH pun1uant to • condltJonal HIH 'flrttmtllt. • Section 7003 reads in relevant part: - "To"'nt" or ·11om1 owner" mNn• an OW"*f Of a manuf.lduntd hom11 who has • tanancy of• lot In a 111.1nufacturad nome commun1~: 1 l••H•. e ICl I Lease (AKA Rental Agreement) 1

• The Re9ldentlal Code defines it as follOW$: - -~1nta1 a~rvemant" ahall main •114 Include all agniementl, wrtu.n Cir oral, which nuibll1h or modify the tanna, conditlon11, rulea, ragul1tJ011t or any other pmvltlons conc•mlng the uaa •nd occupancy of a rental unit. a Section 7003 reads 11'1 relevant part: . - "l.aH11'' or "ranta.l -Ol9tmtnr mHna a written contrlet ~n a landlord and • ttn1nt a•tabllahlng tha i.rm1 1nd condition a whereby• m1nufacturad home la placed llPon or Is •!lowed to .......in upon a ranted or leased lot In a manut.cturtd nome community. 9§ Rent • 'Ole Reelden!YI Caci• di;tH ni;>t denne rent but has ..,.,"al relev811 provlelone thal • ., whet I• eOOllldored r.nl - I.ala'"' ara eoneldlNd l'lrll l&ll01(d) MY• In part: "Alat4Jo& I• corw~r.d u ~llonal ,..lllfot lhe Jll'l'JW>t.. Of ttlle code." - § 5312 Hye In relevant part; {or) Ch•fll•alor utlllly aetvlcH mad• by a lanCllOnl kl a i.nant ahllll b• eoneldt,.CI rent rot ell pUfPOHI under 11116 Com, • Sore1lon 7003 rellde In ftlievant i-rt: • "Renr mHn• mon.y paid by 1 llln1nt to •lt>ldlordforth1 POMHtlon, UM and 11t1Jayrnmn1 of a Nnttcl bl and olflet patls ol lhe pl'llmlHI li'I • 11\anufactqred hom1 comm...ity putwumt 10 • r-.nttl tljlHmtnL For purpaua Of summary poNHObll, rani lncludee 1•1• leoa for rent, other fen and Cl.lergas, indudlnv !Cltlty Cllatgee, et1d lhe •n•nl'a "'11119 01 m• 011 ....... M.....r-.;""d Homo Roloeallon '1'ru11 Fwml ••-omenl. 10 I.Pl What to do before you rant? •Condition of the rental unit - Take photogl'llphs - Ask for wrlttel'I c;hack list tor dellcienctes - Maka sure they tum In sheet and keep ci copy - Remember Code protects you for promls11$ of repairs. 11 (gJ § 5302. Tenant- remedy; termination at the beginnirg of term. • (e) K th• landlord fill• to 1Ubablnllllly conform lo th ..1111t 1grMmet1I. or If lh. . b • matertal noncompliance ~ llnY i:od9, ei.tute, ardfn«n~e or ,.oulallon {IQll•mlng Ill• ~lnt.nlUICt or operauon Of the p,..m11.,., tltv tenant may. on wrlU.n nalle• to1h• ianCllMd, ••nnlnlllt Ille ronw &Qlffmlnt lr\d vaal>etlle pNmltea it any limo during the 191 monlh of occllpaMy, •a bng a1 th• i.n1nt rtnwllna In ponH110n In l'tllan"> on • pmn!H, wlltlhtt Wlfllon ot o,.., by the lllndlord to correct an or any palt ol lhe conellllon 01 c;omlldon1 which would juoll!y terminal.Ion by Che 1tn1nt wnder hit h<ltMm. • Ill) If th• 16119111 19mafn1 In p-uron In retllnct on ~ pwml11, wlletlllf Written ot onl, by lhe llndlonl, to COll'6Ct all or Df't part of tho condition or ~nd1don1 wtolch would juaUly 1'"'11nallon bv 11e ttnanc under lhia ..ell on; 1ndlf l!UlllanUelly tlwi Hm• a~ or omiaolon width eon•lltutH 1 pnor nonco.npllann, of which pnor nollce - given under .ubUGUon (a)ot 11116 a.t:lloo, ,.,..,,. v.lthln 6 tnont11•, th• C•~nl ~ lermlnate Ule torUI ag,..,,.nc upon• r1n11~ daya' wrltllln notice, wlltch notice ehall opec:lfy lh1 btoach and th• d•lill or hinninatlon olttl• ...nlal ·~•ni.nt. ii lg] § 5302 continued • (o) N lhfn •..i.t. •nv a:ondtti'an -...1ir:h daptlv.. 1M&tn.1nt of• 1ubt:&1ntJ•I pwt ottha t1ie·ntnt Ot"e"9Ymmt at"" 11n1nn Oiltllh\, tM c.n1ttt may noU!Y Cllt ll~dlonl in writl119 of u.o •ondlllOfll In•, It tM lllmllonl don nOl romodylht ~ondhlon wilhfn 11 day•, 111e tonanr 1111y t•mrin•m lh• ""'-'' tllll'ftmant. The t•n•nl rnu•l th1n ~ntaat• 11'1•c11onIn1he Ja;i1tkl1 Of HM Paeti COyrt tttkina a dMmtlnaUon lhlt Ch• l•Ntf!Mf h11 bnuhlMI ma 11"n•1.I at-fnl ~y doprl'llno 1111 ltNnl ol 1 •ubaLlnO•f P•tl of lhe HMfk or onjoymonl of 1111 bl !Stlll tnd mu •Hk domogn, ln<lu4lnt a l't<lt doduc11an trom lht dllt ...tn.n nOllce of Ille oondMlan wa• alWn .. tllf lln<llonl. • (d) l'IM 1161111111011 l'llfwmf lo In OYbteollon l•I DI thlo ..eCIOll wtt "'u1dwllltuHy or no911g1noy l>)I 111• ltindlonl, thll•ntnl ""'J ,.....,,.,. tl'Mlor DI: • (1) Th• dlllmMe• b•-n IM rtnt pa]l&blo under lho rwr!IAt '0"'1'1tnl lllt AN "'P"'""' 1110H11ry to olltllft ...,;wr.nt 1ubotltu1o hoU•lng tor tM Rnwmd.•r of lM rwntal term: Dr • (JI An arw.oun< 1q11.1t ID 1 lllOllll\'a l9nl lftd 'M 11<"'1ty d1polll~ • l•l Tho i.tranl "'"J not-... .. th• rt!Ml ltl'ttnoml lor • oondltlon •••- •y tM wtlll of""" aR b~ ttlo ........ • - • I of ltnon(o t.mlly or 1ny otti.r perwon on the preml1H _.°'th• ttnant'• con..m. W• l•llMrt tenn1nata1 wra.rttfwtty. th• tmant 1halt ,.,..,n obllO•llMI tit!Wltt ttM nntal aa ...111•111. rro 0111. ~-••• a13. H •.J 13 [g_I §§ 5104. Obligations of good faith. • Every duty under thia Code, ~md every act which m\Jst be pertonned as a condition precedent to the exercise of a rig ht or remedy under th is Code, Impose& an obligatlon of good faith In 1t$ perfonnance or enforcement. 14 joj §§ 5116. Fair housing provision& • (IJ NO ,.,.an, bMl\f lf\ OWftttl Ot •ttnt of any ,..1.1.talll, tMH.l.H . lptl'lrMift.I Mothff•ttrniM•..... 11 rwfvH ordMJllM ta nnl, . . .,."'• •vDl••M1 HM9n ort:1mc1f eny 1ll11t1"9 Nn&al •QMtntn110 or of M1Y imam or anv ptnon b1 ,.UOft •' "'°'' CtW4:1, nU9ion, m.tt.I 1tatua.. aarar, ...., n1Uol\Jll origlfl, dlublttly.•v• "'°"~~or Hc.t~M lllt '"""' 01 poroon hn • •hl4 or d\lld'9n I~ lllt lt..,,1y. • °' (b) ~o PMH" 1n1u Clemlftd rmc:eM 1 gru1.ar tUM at NTH ror lh1 Ult and occup.-.01 ot 1ny p,.mi .... bt!iel\llt IMi Ptrwvn rwntingi or dHlrtng lo ... nt tM pnnn1111taor1 p1rt1c::uluHc., c,.lod, tt1Jilon 1 m•riDI1tstu.1, colot', •tl. n1UcU~•I otlgtn, d1Hhl04", ... or v~~l.IP11tlon orhH I ahllod or <hllmn In lh• f1mlly. • (e) MM\• ewm otf id~aUvn und« thl• HCJtlon, thll wnant may neewr ill.1M19H tYtWlinW •• • r.Mlfl vi Ill• ..ndlord'• aallon, IM:•udlnt, bul "<111 nm11o<1 CD, t'tOtftHI• n~ ntt•*'"'Y 10 olit.oln od•quoto ••bo- 11ouo1no. • (d) N-•bndlng · - - •·1of1111• M~llOll l't!4llnl IO ta- 41U.Wn•llon, ond conoKl•nt wHh ,_,., •nd 111.1111 fl'lil'f ma-.a Rntll unk• 1w.llablt ••tlVll\Mly for MttiC.I ti)'""'., '•If lloWflf\t Hit,• l•mllord cfUatn•. A Mnlor d tinn .. m.. unk U.11 be ...,. .. bl• lor NM •elfil~ lll .. ~ eftb.•M, wilhovt regard to r.09, c:,.11d, teHglan, mutt.II 1lllU1, IDfot", AD, ftl'fJ&ft.11 ot'f~lt, dlU..Wity 6r O~c..-.Wn vf ~ Hnh:tt icttRen anil wtthaut noard to '"'1tllltr or AOl tho """"" oltinn hn • •IH!nd.nc clllld or 1hlkkon In !hi rutdlnoa. • TIMI M - It tllfOICt41 lly !ht H-.t Rola- Corrml11lon. 1s In I §§ 5106. Rental agreemait; term and termination of rental agreemert. t ~·J Na nntaJ 19....,..nt, un .. H kl wrttmg. &ball bl lft11GUV11 far a IDnpr tarm IMn 1 ymu, t ~b) Whlrw no tlnn 11 up111HIJ pnJ.-.hl1d, a .. n1aJ 11g1'111ment for prwwlH& &MR bl dMIMd and aaMtnled ta b1 fat• "'°"th-4&-Manth ''""' (<I Tho londlord may tennlnoto •ny nmtol -1111111. other thin rwontl!.CCHnO!ICh ,_,_,ta, by 9tvt119 •minimum of IO do)"' - n n.U.. to tl11 2

tonal!\ Priot' .. lh• ..,1,.11on or 1116 ltrm of h romCal "II'".,.."~ Tiit no11.. •holl indie ... 11111 lllt ... - . .m o~ou ~"""nllt upon Ho H Fl,..tJon d•tt . AtoMnt moy """'""'"a Antal ..,..._,, br gt~• rnlnlnlt.IM ol 10 da~•' written non.. pt1011o tho u plnllon af ttM tt"'1 of tho ..mol og-Mtlll th•t ttt. a_.. .... n1 1MI mnnln1ta Upot1 It& •APl..Uon d1lli. • (di Whwt Ille torm of tho rontll atl'ffMtnl I• momh-co-montll, lllt lllndlonl or lllnant ""Y lttminoh lho rontol ogrotmtnl br giving tho oth4r par1y 1 minimum of llO dowo' wlftton nollet, Which tMoy ponoa •hill Hiiiin Ori tho 111 day of lht month following tho day of 1c1ual notl"" . • (•) Wkh r•1•rd to• teni1nt oi:e.up)llr\t 1 f1d.nll)'.. ubsld1Hd PIO\Nll\i' unit, tn the ewnt at ._nw confllA bdwllen th• tlirmt of thi1 Cod• 1nd th• u""" of 1111~ r•cttr.r t.w, r11gufatlon1 °'~It.Mt, th• t111M of the re<MraJ law, rw11ubitlon1or9uktelftt4 t~I control. i6 ILJ1 §§ 5107. Renewals of rental agreements with modifcations =:..~..-.=:=::::.,--:: =:-.:=.·:.::::::::::·:,=~~-:~~,.::.=·,; . =r=.. .°'-:.·:=:.," .. ,_._ - -=w~ .....~Ofltnl..lvc•ftalk•.-al ....., tM~1111t~,..._.,.... h ~ol• t ~ • Mndl~Mlllli"" Wt tn• Plk+l..,~1.,~WMM11m.1t• • Olif&e.,,.......flf~-'11:1"- . . .__.,IMttt ............. .......... ... ,..t'6M\"ttN:...... l•..,....IM l f1tt'NHN.a ........... 1 ~et M •,..~to . . Ul .... d • ... ... t -.--~4tfM .......... R~...W~~R ....... ~ ........ ~ IM •o,..... .., .... , .......... ~ IMMt cf M1M ... n .-.l.<M1.•• W:• . . ..,04 . fqN'tM~rettott"flnwdllirll--- ~-- Ml ..._..41 . ~ 'lf ~~~-·Mtdoft.Hr'll"ltl'Jll ..KllllllMllkll;elN....... IMl .. ~·.. eflldfw.~ROllltt. ~~=~~=-..,~::...~::=.--==-~~;-:.=:::=o::~::..~~.':...97~::=::::HW . . h1mg..il111 IM~Mltll.i ~l-- ...~.m' •~ 't ftft- ~., .....&.ii....-.,"""'Jtftl:t • • ........ ~~f""""'· '"l .. lfl9l!t rl.,,,~ ~ .. ,,....llf.,... c:-.M11tM1..... a1.,,,..uo,..,...... ,.....,.,Uw..,..a..t.11Mt.aO...,.,...ncint11PmMn••M•~ v• o.c.t..w .. a. n s.11 1J 11 U I I §§ 5108. Rental agreement; automatic extension • (1) Wh•re a rental *11.......,.nl, vlh•r than ftt fal'n'I unit, Is fw 1 or more yu.... •nd &O ~ or upward befani tt,. •nd GI th1 lenn elthtr the landlord doe& nat give nodce In W?ltlng IO thtl t.n.11nt of landlotd"a Intention IQ wnnln1te lhe ,.,..ta! •g,...IJMlnt and th1 le1'81'1I daH nol glw 45 daya' notl<;i1to1111 l1ndlorcl or llon.nt'a l~tlon ID 18nnlnal<! Iha nint1I 1iream1nt, the 16nn ·~•II IHI monl!Mo.manlh, •nd all vthu IAlllM Of the nmtal agl'Mfltlnl lllHll COntin\11 In fl.IN bn:e and el'lec:I, • (bl 11le provtelotla af H 1107(•) thto1.19h (c~ of lhlo ti!I. shall oontrol Ir a nntiea D I _.. With modification. ha blln 1enL a (c) Wllb 1'6Q•rd lo • wn1111t occupying a femialfy-b1ldlnd bou&lng unll, In 1119 .v1fl of any confll~t belween lhe t1111M1 tJf this Cc>d• and Iha - · rlf llflY f•d•ral l1w, 1'6gulatlarui or11uld9llnM, Ille tel'n'I& rlf th• "d•rel llW, reguWians or 1111ld•llnM aftall eunlrvl, 10 lo] § 5109. Rental agreement; promises mutual an::t dependent • (aJ Maertal prom!•"· agl'Mln40ntll, covenantt or 11ncl.rtakln(l'9 of an~ kine! to bo performed by tlttltt party to a rtttUI agreement 1h11ll be lntttprvled n mutulll 1nd dtptndent condltlo~ to tll• pe<form11nca of l\'INl'lal promleaa, agreemente, COl/tnartta 11nd unde~kfng1 by the attiar party. • (bl A P'rty u!ICl.t.iklng to """"cty 11 lll'Ndt by the other Plll'ty Ill KtiOrdllnca with t11l1 Coda ahall ha dffll\td to h~ve compli.d with the te11111 of ti* Cod1 lfthair nonccwnpllanc. with the eXKt IMtnK1111nt1 ofthla Coct.11 non111819rlal and non pvjudlclal to the~ party. 19 !o I §§ 5110. Rental agreement: effect of unsigned iental 41greement • l•l If the IHdlard daa• not 1l11n 1 wrtllen -ta.I •grwoiment Wh!M baa baen lllgnod ~ C.n<lolred ta lhe landlarij bf th• ten~. 1cceplanc• t!I ... nt wHhout ruernuon by lhe IMKl!anl shall give lo Ille nrnlal - . - . 1 the 18nWJ affact . . 1111 hold bMn elgned by th• landlord. • fbl If 1111 tenant lb111 not 1lgn • Wlltten rental eg..emenl wh~ h19 bHn algnad •nd 18ndlf911 to lh& ll!ln•nl by Ille landlonl, 11:1:111- tJf poaa... alan and PllYfMnl et ren1 by the ~n•nl, wllhout IMtl'valian, •hall give to lhl ,..ntal ag,.•ITllnt the Nm& "'6cl M If It hltd Ileen algnod by die lltnanl. • (c) wti,,. • ,.ntal agreement which"'-• bwn given lfltct by th, -;illon of thla 1ectl011 P!V"lde• by ha lerms Jot a term longer th.In 1 Y""'" It lhlil operen lo .: ...111. only • 1-year C-. 20 Io I Verbal rental agreements. •Are recognb:ed under the eode, but are not recommended. 21 j[J] §§ 5101. Applicability of Code • (a) Thie Code a hall regulate and detennlne all legal rights, remedies and obligations of all parties and beneficiaries of any rental agreement of a runtal unit within this State, wherever e.xecutad. Any rental agreement. whu.lh•r written or oral. ahall be unenforceable Insofar as the agrHment or any provision thereof conflict$ with any provision of thl:t Code, and Is not expressly a1.1thortzed herein. The unenforceablllty shall not a~ct other provisions of the agreement which can be given effect without the void provi11ion. 22 : o I §§ 5501. Tenant obligations;rwnc."'rent .... .,..Mii _,,.._.,h ...... ..,h. • M,.,. .....~ .......t .............. cmwWl............ • llilftll!t- .. pa~ollt..timomdplooo11-tlll\llllo,..... , ~i..1 .... bNillmaf . . . ~.SM llftMI 1111111 t*r ...... ~I,....,....~"" ... .-oo.-..,.....,. __ i.._o10io°"11.,•... al ..y-.f<wtmonlllor ~. lllft... 1 lnCMll'l'&f.t111i11H M,.,,.flW.M ........... ""99"""'1MftW.ofa lut'i9w ~""- • l<IEJro"fllfo<_of_,., _ _ ... ........,..........., _ _,".,.· • r•INMl"l lht-"' .. --'""""'""'"'--lltolo .,. i...o.nii.. _ . , . . _ otllt<OfOICl- .....,.,1r.-A1oto....,..llOD11•-••..Wlllonol _,....,._ .... c.... .•-""""'""'lll"'"°'"ncooU-•ol"" ""' ,n....,.....,..._,.,u10""°..,._hl....,.ol.,.11!9ld-ll1r"'I"' .. _,..,,,111....-... 11,,,.,.,,1.,....,.,.,.,_o1_.•,,...,_ _.,.....,,,.~~ lft1l, lnN OOUfttw'~wltCh h- ,...l "-P\ J •~ . tn111~ m.WC.at .... ,.pt""'""' P*'-flM'rwotlftOl ....,.._..•, ....,.IW'\"'9Y .. 9nlt/ ~- '"""'" ~"""' "" "'fM•orOh1 111 ._. ,...,. o1 .,. """""...,...""'....,. IN)"llfld ... 4u.• 4-•~ • (tfJH'allfdOnl ~ 11111111" piaYft'llll'iW....t.••t.i~ lh•' wtllln tlUV..a•ve illih...,.. • fft!llpt">rw.t,arnwiL 1'11• 111111!1kln::l atuil...,.•"'10d 1111'~ yarti , rnmi...-. • ...-nl cl ~t R«I rwM,n far IWIL 23 ID I Other Faes • The code has a num bur of provisions govemlng what fees can or cannot be charged. As previously mentioned you can charge a late fee. See §5501 above. You may also be charged an applleatlon fee. Assurance money Is prohibited, and aU other fees are 3

covered by §5311. 24 [§ §5514 • (Cl) Wh1rv 1 t.anant II Nqulrtd to PIY I hi to dirtarmlnt ~tenant'• crtellt worthlneae, such , .. It 111 tPPllCttlon fet, A i.nCllOrd may chuva tn 1ppllcatlon '"• not to eir.ctMd the gNater of tither 10 pen:ent of the monthly rtl\t fortl\11 rvntal unit or $50, ta datennlno • ttnant'• cl'9dlt worthlnen. The l1nc11ore1 111a11, upon ...:lllpt at •ny monty Plld 11 ;an 1ppllcatlon ''•• fumlth • ...Ulpt to th• tenant for tho full •mount pi11d by 11111 tenant, •nd th•ll maintain for• period of 11 leaet t yeen, compl.U rtcotda of •II 1ppllution fen ch1rgtd and lmountll nictlved fot .. cl'I •11c11 he. Wh11rv the lendlOl'd unl1wflill)I cN«ianda mont than th• ellowtblt IPPlltatlon fee, the tenant ahllJI be tnthlff to Clamqea equel to do11blt tht fln\Ou.rt Chiirged .., an appllc-tlon r.. lllf tht landlord, 2s ciI I §§ 531 O. "Assurance money" prohibited • (•I In rtll'/ lranHcllon """•1'6111 •n opPll~Clt;111 ~ rMdt llV 1 proepecBvo bMnt lo 1 - • ctw.lllnlJ unit, 111• proepecllv• Ian di~ or owner o1' llM dWelllng Ul'lit oh•ll not •'lk for, nor reciel'lt, 1ny "jtaUNtlCt money" or o"'-r poymenl Which la Mt •11 •ppliarllon f .. , Mcurlty dllfl081, pet depoall tJr •lmll•r d•po,lt reHrvlng UH -mno unit for lb• PIOIPtCllVf te111nt for a llMe certeln. The Pf"Q•pec:ttve 11ndlOl'd lhall rltJIct..,."" proitpKtlve twMn~ aa a,.. fOt any midll Df vllm' type of lnveet1oalltlft. atty .....,,. hn lh• -i>e~lflc coat or 1uch lnveatlglilon. ForpurpO'f• of thl• HCllon. •aoourance rnonoy• th.ii mean 1ny pa)IMnt to Ille protp..ctiv1 l•~lonl by 1 ptoepecll~• ten-..t. ump!.., ..,p11~1t1on foe, 1 paymtnl In the way o# • ~u'11Y d-11, pet d•potlt or olmll•r depo•lt, r•HMng th• dWtlllng u111t for tho pro•111~Uv1 ltnlnl for a Ume ~rtaln or tho ...1mbo.nln11 oflh• tpeclne 1uflla eopend..t by the l•ndlonl In Cf9dH or other ln~11Ug1lona, 26 in I Assurance Money Continued • lb) Each landlord ehtll m.ln, rot a period af & month•, the -.cords of Heh application rr111da by HY prospectlv• t•nant. Upon any c:Qmlllalnt Of a vlolation of thle •action, tho Contumtr Protac:tlon Unit ol the Attomty O.n.ral'• office •hill lnvt•tlo* th• aam., •hall Interview tenant. of tht lanellor'd and ah1H, undlll' appl'()f)N'- . .arch W11rtant, hne the right to lnv"tlgatt •II 1'9~ords of the lend lord perUolnlng to •Ppllcatlona mada within Iha ~Cllng I months. If •uch ln1ro•ttgat1on reveal• good cmuae fQI the Atcorney G•n•tara offlca to 1Ntlle11e the,. llH 11..n a vlolatlon of thla e~on. the Attorney Genanol'e olftce -~ lttut auch CHH ind deelat onlert In ac:conlanca with ff 2.617 of Title~· u lrt required to remedy tht vlolation. i1 (g] §§ 5311 Fees • Except for an optlorwil service fue for actual servlct9 rendered, such as a pool fee or tennis court ftt•, a landlord shall not charge to a tenant any nonrefundable fee as 11 condition for occupancy of the rent.I unit. ia [DJ §§ 5301. Landlord obligation; rental agreement • (•I A rental ~ •h•ll n<>t provldtdl" 1 llnanti • 111 A-• to W8lvt or roreoo rigllta or .........ii.. unw thl• Cod•i • {~) A14thlll1~" any IMl'IOn to conr.u ~ont an • ~l•lm arising out or lht rental _......,.nt; • l~l A11rH• to tht 1xc:u1paaon or HmltaUor1 al' •nr llablllty d tho liindlonl 1111e1ng under law ar to lndem~fy ttie l1n<11onlfor 111at llabllily or lt11 coem connacted tlllrewllh. • (b) A provttlon prohibited b~ •u-tlon (•) of till• netlt;111 Wlllc:ll la Included lrl lhB ,.,.... a~t It unenforceable. II a l•ndlord attempta to ent111rce pruvi•IDns c:if ~ renl1ll 1qrument known by th& landlord to be pn>hlblled by 1ub1ecllD11 (a) of lhl• •~Ion lht t1n1nt may bMg an •ttlon b:I re~ovtr an 1mount equll to 3 lllDlll!s rent, tage\htr with coat1 o1' eult but t1eludlng .tlDlfttYt' tvw. 29 (gJ §§ 5111. Attorney's fees prohibited • No provi11ion in a rental agreement providing for the recovery of attorney's fees by either party In any tldt, action or proceeding arising from the tenancy shall be enforceable. 30 IDI §§ 5107. Renewals of raital agreements wlh modifications • (a) 11111111.ndlltl'd lr1tond1 lo non.w th• rvntol agre•ment 1ubjeit ID emmded or modlfttd prvvtelorra, the ll/MllG!d 11'11!191•• IM lanant a Minimum of 60 d•y•' wrln1n noll1:1 prfor lo tile t11plrat1on Of Iha rental _.,,.M thll lht 111re111Mnl 1h1llbe renewed ..,bJ•i:t to emended ar modified provi.k>n•, lncluclln11 wt n41 llmitlld ltl, all>Ondod plVYlolon• relltlng lo Ill• longlll d tann or Ill• amount al secu~ly dap°"" or rent. S~h nollca lhln •PKllY Iha modllll!ld tJf •mondltd prov!~-. lh• amount or eny redt tit -.orily dapmlt tnd lt.e dam on which eny modHl~etlDnt or amon~nlt thlll lake llff.ct. • (b) After receipt tJf *uch notlc• fn;nn llM lmdlord, unleu the •n1nl notltlH Ille lelldlard of the t.nanl'• lnlendGn to MrmlMle the ex1611no t"el\t61 ICl"",.,...nt a minim..,, of ' I days prlor 10"11 141st day o1' tlll tenn, tlll provhllotl• Oftlle IHl10nlled ar modlfltd nontld .agreement shell be dnmed 10 t..ve bwn IK'cepC8d Ind agreed lo by tlll tenant. and l\6Ulrmot1fthe1-, •••mended, thaM Ilk• Ml lote61"4ellect. 31 Io I Renewals ~ith modifications • (~) H Ihm •1U1nt s.jt~ lhe l1'IOdln.d 111m11 or prcwt.iont HI ICK1h In a notice o1' ritMWal given 1111ci.r lhlt HCllClrl. then the llljec:IBd w !Wiie• qf ren•w•I •hail con•ldtred an .n1ellv1 ltrmlnal1on notic.. • (d) The"'""' qf •ubMctlom (•) tll1911gh f~ v1thl•1ffllon 111a11 not bl 1ppllcmbll Whtre Ill• ttnant'e rent Md aecutlty ci.po111 .... • tuncilon vi lh• 1enanl'1lneonw In aeconlmce wllll on~ form or ..gUllllon• ar guldllln•• or Ill• United Sta.i .. Depan!Mllt of Houaino Ind Urt1an l>welopment (HUD}; In th• .vent !hot tiler •rt• functbn of fncornt, th• regulation• 111111 guldtRnH ellal>llol\ed by HUD with rag•rd to th• dotennlnotlan and fu1Mrw ad)1'lll11>8'11t d • tenont'I nmt •nd ..,uJil)' dt111>1n 91laM !ll>Ytm. Wltll regard to I 11n1nt.. occupying HUO.•ub.sldlud unlbl, In the ev1n1 of •ny confllctbetwun tho l•mw ol lhl• Cod• •nd "1• Wnr4 of MIY HUD regul•llon or gufdelino, lho '"""" d • HUD re9wlion at guld1llno sl111ll mnln>I, 32 Iti] §§ 5108. Rental agreement; automatic extension of agreements • or (•)Where a t"erltal agt"eelll6nt. ethet !had fur rami unit. 11for1 or MOl'e ye8l'tl, and ID dl.y1 upwatd -"*Illa end tll lile term ailher 4

the l•ndlonl cloH not OW• nMJc. In writing ... tlM lenant of lllldlafd"• intentlun tu •mnnlMt. ttt. r•nlel ao_,.,, _ the t.nont do.. nat g4.., '4S day1' notice to IM landlol'd of llm•n\'1 lnttnUcm ID lermlnal6 thl!t nimbi ...... ,JJMnt, the term ahan be lllOl'ltholo.....,nlti, ;and all alti•r lllrm• of lti• renllll agrMinent •h,.I ~ontlnue In full llDn:• and -ct. • (b) Th• pravlalona o1ff fi107(a) through(~) otltlll lltle llhatl conll'Ol If• nallco ot ran-al wt111 m611Wlcallt1nshH b"n Mnt. • IC) With regard to • ten11nt na:upylng. t1111ra11y-11uMldlmel l\au.tne ur>t~ In lh• IYM or any COl'tnlcl b-••n w.. term• or 11118 Code and th• term& of any fedarsl low, r.gutMlone or guldellnH, ~ ""1tul at ttle ftderal law, regullllf11'd1 otguldtiNne• ahllll ..,ntrol. 33 [gJ §§ 5514. Security deposit • Cal(1) A landl6rd mey nqul"' "1• PllYll*ltof llCUl1ty ~II. • (2) No MdlOrd ....,. rwqulrY • NCUrlly d•pHll In • - • uf 1 m<mth'• rent Wll- - Nntll agnemont 11~r1 yur or more. • (3) Na londlord nwoy r9<1ulrw a ..curlty depoall In escqs ot 1 montfO rent {With the eacepllon of fedlr1lty-u111i.d houalng nogulolions), for primary rHtdenttal i.11a11cios DI ~nd•ftned terrM or montll IG month where "11 c.nancynaa tailed 1 yea; or mare. After lh• 111plr;i.tlon 0( 1 year, Ille landlord sh•lll lmm•dlately rwtum, u a ctedil ID th• •en•n~ ~ny amowit In exctH t# 1 month's ren~ • (-4) The HCUr1ty depoalt llmlte. aet forth llbQye $hall not apply to fUmlahed nint.I unltlJ. t (b) eoch HC:Uflty depaait •hall be pieced bv ti.. Mlndlord h'I an Merow b•nk llCl:QUnt 111 I hfttally-lnsuntd banking lnatltut1011 with an Ofllce th•l eccepta dep°'llt wttnln th• Stan. Such account ah•ll bt d11lgnmd •• • aacurtty depoall9 •c:c:o11nt encl •haQ not ba uaad In the opa,..tlon Of 1ny butinwa by the lendlonl. Tnt 11ndlOl'd thllll dlaclou to the tllnent the locllllon Of tha Hcurlty depoali •cicount. TII• HCurtty deposit prtni:l!l'I •hell Ill lllld •nd admlnletered for the blnefll of tM tenant, and th• tenant'• ci.lm to 1ucll mOtlty ahllll ba prior to that of '"ll Cl'ldllOI' of tfNI landlord, Including, b11t not Umllad to, a truatee In llM!lrupecy, tvan If auch mCJMY II cornrnlngltd. Js !ol Security Deposit continued • (t:) Tiie pulpUH "'ltl• HCilr11y depoall ahall 11•' • (ti Tu rolmbun• "11 landlonffor actual dam.eg•• l;l!llSld to UM pn1mlua lly Ille letlanl whldl •11e<"d normal wear and !Mr. at whl~h cannut be wrrec:t.d l>y painting and ardln..., ct..nln11; ~nd/or • (1) To IN'Y UM tamllonl 1Dr 1111 ranllll a,....enga 00. under the 19111111 •11-•~ inc:tudOig l•I• ch•llH and n1111a1 dte Jot,...,.,_.,. tarminlltlo!I or •IHtndonmenl Oflhe tentlll . - n t liy th• hm•C and/or • (3) Tv n11mb11rM ltl• landlord for all -.....hi• ••pemw lnc:unwd In -a11t19 - ...,.ndng the~ ceulltdlly th• ~"' t•l'lnln«tlon of the rwnllll . , . _ . . . , lhe lllnonta, wlllch I - • -natl"" pumtmnt 1a H 631• of tni. mi.. pioovklHlg lhol retmbwrMm9!11 c:aullltd by lermlnMIOl'I pumu.,.11111 ff 531• of ltJle tltla &hall not esceed t munlh'• rwnl. • by Ill• landlord. 36 Io I Security Deposit continued • (d) Whtrt ' uin1nt It rvqulnld to pmy 1 tee to d_..rmlttt t111 ttnanr1 W"edlt wortlllne1a, 1ueh fff I• an lppllRtlon r... A tendto!'ll may c~• an appllcdon he, nat to ••c..d Ult g ....i.r of either 10 perant oftht moMtity 1Wnl fortM nmr.I unit or UO, to ""9n'l'ti1111 1 tenant'• credit worthlneH. 1'llt llndlotd tlhall, upon receipt of'"~ mone, paid H mn •PPOotlon fH, fvml•h 1 ncalpt to the tenant for tn• full amount paid by the btnmnt, end 11111 maintain fol'• ptlflod of 11t ltHt 2 Y*''*• i:omplata racorda of 11ll 11PPllc1tlon r... charved 1111d amo11nt1 r1ulved for Heh such tee. Whlll't tho landlord unlawfully dwmncl• m0rt than the 1ftoweble appllclltl11n '-t, t"8 ttmint 1h1ll b1 sntltled to d1m1gH tQ1,1•I to double tha amount cha~ H •n 1ppllc.tlon '11• 31 10 1 §§ 5514. Security deposit cont , ,., Hth• t1ndlord la nd - - "'.ti ur •11Y portion ol tl1e HCUrtty depOllt. the ~ tlMll n1mlt tl1e NcU111y ddpOalt wltliln 20 daye of Iha Apilllti6n 61' tenninol;kln Qf the rent.I "lll'lement. • (I) Within 20 doors .tt.r the tlrmlnatlon or arplrallM "'•ny l"lllrtll 1grM1M11t, Iha tandbrd 111111 ~!he tenant with an l9miad ll•t ol da"'ll!IH I.Cl ti.. ,...mi... and the ttaUm.lad o;Qoll qf repair for Heh and 911an lllndar ~''"""'for ihe dtntninee between tho HCUr1ty d•PD•ll llfld tlUeh - of l'llpait af d·-~ I.Cl .... premtan. F•llUN ta da •a •h•ll ~CIMllM• •n aclolowtedgment"' lhtl lillldlord that no P•vm•t ffll' demae• Is~. T1nant'1 accapl8nCe of a payment 1ubmltllld wtlh 111 h•mlzad 111t of damagt1• shell oon1t1tU11 sgreemen1 on Ill• do..._.• -cHled by Iha l•ndiord. unlolln lhe •nent, within 10 day• otlhe i.t1anr. c.nder ut payment, oll)lcta In writing*' it.. •moun1 wllhh,lld Dy Iha tandlotd. ,..;;"'* Df •""'1 • I 38 ID I Security Deposit continued • g) Penalties. -- • (1) Failure to remit the security deposit or the difference behwen the security deposit and the amount set folth In the list of damages within 20 days from the expiration or termination of the rental agreement shall entitle the tenant to double the amount wrongfl.Jly withheld. 39 [g) §§ 5514. Security deposit cont. 2) Failure by a landlord to diselou the location of the security deposit account within 20 days of 11 1 written ntqueat by a tenant or failure by the l<tndlord to deposit the security deposit in a federally- Insured flnanelal Institution with an office that accepts deposits within the State, shall constitute forfeiture of the security depOSit by the landlord to the tvnant. Failunt by the landlord to return the full security deposit to the tenant within 20 days from the effective date of forfeiture shall entitle the tenant to doubl11 the amount of th• security deposit. 5

40 02) Security Deposit continued • hi AH co1M11AnlceUone and o>oll.:ot•, l~ng the mum of any -urlly ~po1l111nC1trllllt 1ee110n, •hllll bt cllr.cl•CI to IM landlord .t th• •ddrnt •Ptelftlld In I.lie tent.I "ll"'"""'nl 1nd lolh• tenental an ocldntQ •l"CllMCI In lh• te'11al •&'""""'"' 0< ti 11-anllng addrwa, If provleled hi writing by th• ltnlrf 11 or '"10f lo lho t ..nnlnaUon or 11'11 renlal 'OfH""'nl Fallu,. by 1ht 1tn111t 10jll'Ovldo 1uch 1dd,..1 ehal telleve ti•• Llndbrd of l1nel0td'I Nepon.. bRlfy to give noUce horeln and 18<\donl'io li..1>1111)' for doul>le Ille amount of Ill• aacuflty dapoait as prov~ herein, but 111• lendlord 1h•ll con""'" to be l11bl1 to Ille b!ir1-.1fur1111y unut1d portion ti the Hcur1ty Clepoet1: provld<!d, lhat me 1tM.nt1h1ll R'llka 1 eliolm In writing to lhe landlonl wltlllr1 1 yHr from the t.rmlnallon or explraUon or the tent.I "llr..""'nt. 41 lg_j §§ 5514. Security deposit cont. • (I} Pet .S.,....itf, - o (11 A l1111dlord ml)' require a petdepollt. D.m•ge wltlenmllll unllCllUMdby an animal ah•ll ftrllbe deductlldll'Om 1111 pal depo•lt, Wh•re lhe PM dtpo1lt la 1n1Ulllclenl. tu eh d•mm11t1 may be deducled fl'Om the aecurlty d""""'t, A p« d•-'' '' IUlljeet lo •u~~· (bl, (1), (11, U" and (h} d lllhll 1111~lon. • ta} No landlord m1y 1'91JUll'I a pel ci.pc>all In ~can of 1 monlh'a renl regatdlMa ol lho d11n1tlon of the rw1t•l 1Dreement. • 131 A leridlol'CI may tequln1 an llddhlolHll dopollt fnlm I i.111nt wltll e pat, bul 1hllll nv& ntqUl'11ny pet dtpoell rnn11 a teo~nt lf111• p.c 11 1 duly certified 11\d ftelnad suppqn 1nlmel f(M' 1 CllMblad p1ts0n who Is" rnldent of tilt nintal unlL • ij) Ir 1116 rent.I "II""""'""'"° -clftM, a landlord may ln~nr•• lhe ,..OIMtty depotR commenaunite wllh Iha rent, If ltl• lnt:f't•t Of Ille lt!Cur'ity dap""ft will ·~c11d 10 perHnt Ol lhe monthly rent, p•ym•nt r;if lh• lncrneed eecurlty depoelt shall blJ p11:1r11ted over Ille term Of Ille ........... agre•m1N1t, •Mc opt In lh• CIH or MOl'llll-to-monlh blnol'l':y, In which CIM payrMnl Ol Iha lnGnr•H ·h~ll b• prorlll•d over I petlod 01 <4 month•. 42 f Ul §§ 5511. Rules and regulations; tenant obllgatloos • t•) Ille.,__ The imant - an DUI.,. In with the l;'ORMllt Gt~ tenant - I obey 1111 oiillgalian• or rnlr1ctlonll, wllelher danarnln..Wd by lhe l•ndlonl ea "rulH," "tegulallono,• "nttlrlctlon1" or olllMWl81, COl'ICflrnlng th• bfn1m"1 UM, gceup-.i and m•lnt.n•fK.I of the ntnt1I unit. 11ppurten1ncea lhen1ta.,d lh• PfllPlrlY uf which lh• rental unit I•• p..,.,Jf; • (1) Sych obOmUon1 Md rtttrlcUona pttM!!Dt! l!t b..ab. yfwty. pull!. PdYAt! f!\IOymbnt ar wttftct. pwt IOd OfOIC Qf lbt t8net'lt.j Rromot• lh• llC!ltrV&llofl Oltlle l•11cllo!!ft Q!l!P!nv frpm abu11; end promotl tho felrd!Jtrlbutlon of 11rv!cn and taclllll•• P!l!•ldtd for&ll ttnmtt Ol!!•Qll,)r, and • (21 Such Obl'Olllont. lrld ro•lrl«IO.. .,. bfou!ltil lo Ill• -nllon Of Ille 1-. ...1.1 tha .,,.. 9f Ille teNnra •ntrv into Iha . _.... nt to occupy 1111 rental 11n1t: Ind • (31 such obll(plllOn• and re•trlctlon• arv niaaonallly relall!d lo Iha purpon fVf which iley are promulOAtad; and * • C41 liiluch obll1t11tlen1 111d nalrictlona apply to •II mn•nl$ 'If Vl9 prop•rt.1 In I.tr m•nn•r; and 431.n I §§ 5511. Rules and regulations; tenant obligations cont .. • (I) Such ob4ivi1Uon1 1na -btctlone - aulllclanty Hpllc!ll In VI• p~~lllon, lllredloo'I t>r linllUtlon af Inform wnanl of what 141nant mu11 or muat not doto comply; and th•"""""• conwcl to lalrty • (81 Such 111>1l911110H 11r rt•irfdtvn•, If not meda known lbllla b!il'l&nUt th• wmm1ncement of tAnancy, 1re btOught toth• -ndon of the lwnanl - If uld obllgaU- WOr1< a llUbelanllal MOclftG.tiona af th• i.... ll!lrell!Mnl lll•V have boitn conoanled ID 111 W11\tnll l>V ltnanl. • (b) All tanonb 11011 llther gu- of th• preml- wlll'l Iha ctin. . nt of t.nant -'11U conduct themaalvea In 111 mon""r lhllt d - not unraosonably lllllllrf•re with tt.. p.ceful enJOymenl of lh• other lon>1mt:. 44 1o I Practice pointers • 7. Condition of the rental unit. • A. Tenant complalnt1. All complaints must be In wrlllng and must be delivered by one of ttie re~gnlzed methods of delivery of notices. Key considerations 11111 do the comphllnts have to dO with 11sa11ntlal services, conditions of the unit, or loss from Hre or other lo.ss. Thu following s11ctlons sets fortti most of the landlord obligations concerning the condition of the property, Fanure to comply with any of these can result In a complaint from tenant. 45 Iu I §§ 5305. Landlord obllgatlons relating to the rental unit • t•I Th• l111tdl9t'd •h•ll, ot oft tinw• during th. hlnona~: • (1) Qomply \Nflh. •11 IHlleolt lh"h'ltkm1 llf •nv •t• or toa1I it.tut., ciodlt, rwgul•tan GI' enl&lt•ncit tovtMing •h• m1km!Mnc•, 11onstruauon, UM or """""'""(•,.,Ult ,.ntel un~ Ind-.. IH'Ol*iy of which it i• a pan; • (Z) Pfo'llMI• 11 ....,., unit""'~ •h•N nvi •ndanaer ttle heami,, w.nare or Yr•tv or lh*tMNnta orae~1,.1~9'tt t.l"ICI wtiidl i• fitfwtlw PUFDOH forwhlah It .. e11pn11ly nnt.d: • CJ, KHp fn I 4!1Hn lftd HftllapY MllllllHle.. ._,, f:O"'MOn ....... of the ltvfl~ftlll, grvundti, P1alNtlH and 1ppt.1rtilnlne:. . lt\eret6 whli:f't .... r'l'Mlinll•nmd by lhtr londlant; • (4) MK1 d G\llht by •.w,...,_a., 1nd 1rnng11n1nt• MGHHty to put 1"d ll:Mp tM r.Mal "'"'' •r'lcl "1t 1~•urtlnans-e1 th1r.to tn •• 9oad • aondHlon H they '#llN, or Dr mqret1ment tD hlw bun, at th1 aamm1ne11rmnt DI IMi l•l'Mll:Yf 111d • ($) "•lntoltl Oii lleetricol, plumloln• and alh..-1.. Ukr.o ouppll.a 1111- l.lndlanl In 'aad -riling anlw, 46 [[JI §§ 5305. Landlord obllgatlons relating to the rental unit cont .. • (bl If Ill• rental aareemen110 ..,.c111.... Ille lal'ldlot'd ahlll! (II Pnnltf• ..,d rnalnbln ~ -..piadH Mid <:anvimlancm for lh• 111mov•I at •hn, l\ll>bl•h ind ll!lltNllll and Mnlll!ll for Ill• rrequenl tetlWWal at 1UCll wa1te: and • (l) Supply nr ~·us• b ba "'-"Plied, wet.or, hot wataf, haal •nd eledriclly to the rent.I unit. • (cl n,. tandlcnS and lenont...., 119,.. by a -flla-• writing, aapatala ftam llHI -111re-i. lllat lh•lan..,l la ID patfOrm ~·d ,.polrs, melnlonam:n t.••, ol~lona ot remodl!llhl(I. but Only If! • (1) 111• pt1'"1:~kfw1;1!1< ID ba pmfonnod by lh• btn...t l•fotlhitprlmory benalllaf lhe-lel urllt: 8<\d • (2) n,.-"' Is nat necauary la bring a t1G1Cmllpiyh1fl 1'911181 1.111l lnlo campllll'lc» Wfttl • bulllno or llauatno e -. otdlnance or ttle 6

47 1D l Landlord obligations • (3) Adequ•te con•ldo,.Uon, illpmrt from •ny provlalQn ot tno rental 1.gnK1111&nt, or a roclllctlOt'I In th• rvnt le Hchenged fOI' th• len•nt'• promlH, In no nillnt may the landlord t,..11t 11ny lllQl'ffm•nt undar mi. aun.octton as ;ii condition to any provl•lon of rtntal ;iignHlfTWHlta; and • (4) '!lit 1119'1'Mmvnt of tha pert!" I• •nttNd lnlb In good faith •nd la not for tn. purpoae of nadlng '" obllgilltlon Of th• lillndlonl. • (d) Evldenc11 of cOITIPll•neo with th• appllceble bulldlng lllld noushig codaa ahaU be prim• faclt t\'ld•nc• that the landlord hH complied wtth thla chapter or wlCll 111ny otnor ehaptvr of Part DI of thla Utle. 46 [g ] §§ 5308. Essential services; landlord obligationand tenant remedies • {•I If Ille landlonl •ubstan!Wly f11ll• to provtlle hot-'· Mat. w•r ar •!.c!licllY ID e t•n•n~ or flllla to n.nedy any ~•mdhlQfl 'Mlleh mat.,,any d.pllvn a tenant d a Hbwtanll&I part Of Iha beftflflt of th• t.inanl'• bll!ll.in In Ylolallon fll lhe rental -""'nl; or In vl<llatian af a pruvt1li:>n i;if thl1 Coae: or In ~lolaUan of an -•ol>la hou.11111 coda and aueh fan .... 1:ontinuu for 4e houra ormore, after the...., ..... fjw- Iha landlonl aelu111 or wrlttM notice flt th• fallu ..., Iha ttnant m11y: • {11 Upon wrtti.n llQtlce of th• oonllnuatlon Of the problem ta Cha t.ndlonl, lmmedlllely ltmllnata Iha n11QI agr. .m•nt; or • C21 Urx>n writtwi notice to Ille landl!M'd, ""P twn-thlnl$ l19r dl•m f9nl accruing during any partod wt..n hot water, heal, wet.or, eltctli<:lty or eqlllvalent aub1t1tut1 hautlngl• nl>I 1uppll9CI. The landlord may avoid this llllbllty l>y • •how1nu d lnlpoatlbllly of 119rlormance. 491 o I Essential services • (b) If the tenant hais given the notice required under subsection (a) of this section ;ind remains in the rental unit and the landlord still falls to provide water, hot water, h.at and electricity to the rental unit as specified In the applicable city or comty housing code In violation of the rental agreement, the tenant may: • (1) UPoft written notice to the landlord, Immediately tennlnate Che 1'9ntal agl'ffment: or so l_gj §§ 5308. Essential services; landlord obligationand tenant remedies cont... • 121 UPon notice to lh• landlard, P""'""' ..,.1valent •u-lute hoUlll'IQ Jot H '°"'II .. heat. w-r, hot w•I« Of tltctl1cHv la not 1uppll6d. during which time the f9nl 1h11l 111ai. lftd lh& lll'ldklrd sh•ll l>t liable for any addlllollll l!CpHMI lncurrod by th• wnant. \IP to &I'll llalf of lhll 1,,_.,,t af abllted r.nt. '1'1118 add111cn1I eapenlle sholl nat b1 ~h~rge•ble to the landlord If l1ndlard is •bl• to •hQw 1mpoaelblllty of petfonnan~e; or • C31 Upon Mitten notle8 lb Iha lllOdkKd, ten1111t may Withhold IW6-llllrde pet dl11111 "'"' ""~rv11111 dunng..,,. period When hot wllor, heat. wM&r a< equlv1lanl aubotllu1, ho11.in11 I• noteuppUed. • (cl Rent WllhhOlding .i.,.,.. nQI ar:t a 111 bar to lh& eubaequent feOOVilo'y of~· by 1 tenant If tho• dlmage• •scaod the amount wtthll&ld. s1 [gj Rent withholding provisions • (d) WlleN a landlord R••., ""•""for •lllllfl*Y poaHuloft, clelmtng lhlllt a ""111111 hu ~Uy Wlttlhetd Nt'll or dadur:t•dmonay lnlm rwnt undel' lhl• •oetlon ond !ha cClllntCI flncll, Ille lenclord thlll 1141 entltf-1 ~ ~ from lhe lenul llitlll!ll' pa•omoloo qf tha pr&Maea M 111'1 at'llOUnl ul mon'y _ . t to the 11110Unt wningfuly wlhMld C"d4lrnatln") or, If me court - the t.n.rit •~In bad relll'I, lhl amount af l'Mf18Y 911ual to double the ~t .wotigfullywffllhltld rdout>lt ci.maoee"}. In Ille evant th• ~DYii awmil damat•• or douhhl d"'"agn and eourt ;oata exctudlng a1on1.,.• ,..,., then th• court ahall tnue 1111 order rmq11lrlng .uch dlJMUBI Ot double damag-. IO bl Plld by IM t1nanl to Ille ~~within 10 ~ fnlm the clllle of the eourh. Judg""'nt. If sueh d•mtg• arw nat jHlld In ai;i;onlane• with 1h1 00Ufl'1 order, till jtldgnwint for i:lilmaliff Clf doubla damag... klflethv with i;ourt coew, •hall become • judgm•nt fOf" tha imOUnt wllhhtkl, lfUI IUl'lll'IW'J po-.aMton, wtf1outfurther nouce to 1111 tanant, 52 fn·I §§ 5309. Fire and casualty damage; landlord obligation and tenant remedies • (•)If the ,.nl•I unit or any other property or appul111n1nCtt• nt1:1UllfY to llM anJoymenl tlleraOf anr danwgad Of dntroyed by nre or CHualty to an od8nt that enjoyment of llltNnlal ul'lll lt tub•landeffr lmpalrmd. and •ui;ll llN or othtr catuelty DGGu,. wlthoi£ l'llull on the part cf the U...ant, a,;• m1mb11Jof 1ht c.n1nt'• funny, or 1nollltt pa ..on an lhepnimtsH with 11111enenrecOM1an~ lho illln•nl llli.Y: o (1J lmmtdtal1ly quit the pramteea ll'ld p romptly n<rllfy tlM lanc11onl, In wrlMg, al the tenant'a etelltkm ID quh within 1 WHk liter n~aung, lfl Whlcfl ca. . IM ,..1'1161 l!Vro•m•n ahall IWmln•I• H ol' th• dll• or vacating. If 1111 lilnant f•ll•m -lfy th' landkml OI' lht l•nanre el.ctlon to <iult, 1116 tenon! ohall i. li.tl>le for rant ~cN1111110 UM dal• ol' the l•ndlotd'o ..:tulll knowlodga al Iha ltnllnt'a vacllllno 1111 rentet unit M hnpoasbility ur fllrthtr IX'WPancy1 or s3 IQ.1Fire, water and other issues • (21 If continued occuP11ncy It lllWfUI, v111cato a"¥ put of the p111mleee rvndarad unua.bl1 by fl,. or cnualty, In which .:Me the ten;iinl'• li•blllty for rvnt •h•ll ba reduced In propc>lllan to tho dlmlnlltlon Of ttl• t.IJlt rentill value of the rvntBI UR~ . • (b) If the nrnfill agnttHMnt le terminated, the landlord ehall timely nitum •ny HClll'ltY d1po11t, IJ)tt 0.potlt and pnr-pirld rant. axcept that to which the landlord la entllled to retain puni11.1nt to lhl• C«le. Accouriuno tor l'lfnt 111 the n11111t of t.nnlnatlon or apportionment ahall be made aa of Iha ~of the fire or Cllitll~. S4 IO I §§ 5307. Tenant'• remedies relating to th• nmtal unit; repair and deduction fTOm rent • l•I If 1h111 lat'ldlatd of a rental unit fella to repelr, maintain flt keep In a aanltaty cot'ldltlon 11111eeaed ~mlae• ot plltfonn Id any olhat numn.,,. rilqUir&d by etatute, cOde ot -nMce, ot M tttffd It> In the a rental 1Qt'18Mfll'll: end, If at'llt beil'l(I nalflild In wrlUng by Iha t.1'111nt ta do eo, tile landiMI ~ • C1) Fells ID .........., sudt foHLd within ;Ml dip fftll'll the l'&Cllpt of Ille l'lotlC&: ot 7

• (~) Fall• lo lnhl«I• reuonable comdlvit RlllM111,... wMff •pproprllltJ!, lncllldlng, but not Hmlted to, II•• obllllnlng of an ...tinlol• "11119 pttilipedlva ~~"' "1 the corrwc\lol\, wlllllll 10 days frvm lht ~lpt of Ille l\OllCe: • Th•11 th• l•n1n1 may Imm~•·~•~ door h••• c!on• lfl• nec..1uy - 111 a """'""•Ion•! mU1nw. An.r the ..ark I• d<;I.,., thv 1e1111nt moy d•duet 1rom Ille Aini I reuonabll sum, nOI txCHdlng $200, or ~·111111" Qf 1 monlh'1 rent. Wlllcllaver i9 les•, for th• 111<pendllurH by •Ubmltllng to Ille i.MIOnl CXlpiM of thOM 11Kt11j>t1 cov•rl119 at loaot lh• sum d•cluctecl. 55 [OJ Tenant Remedies • bl In no 1v11nt may • tanant repair or cau.. anything ta bll nipalntd •t ti!• Uindlord'• vxpenae when ~ eon<lltlOn cOmplalnltd ofwn c1uud by tlle w•nt of duv i:are by Iha t1mant, • m'!Mbtl' of the tenant'• famlly or an11t111r p..-ton on tilt pnrm1...11 with Iha IJ!narrl'1 conHnL • (c) A tenant who It otnti'MH dellnqullllt In tha payment of r.nt may not t.ka advantage of~ ~In provided In thla aactlon. • (d) The t.tn.int It INiblll for any damage to Ptrson• or pl'Opilrty where much dam•gt WH ~uHd by the tenant or by 110meona authorized by the wnant 111 making aid nipalni. sG lgj §5302 Tenant Remedy • e) The tenant may not terminate the rental agreement for a condition caused by the want of due care by the tenant, a member of tenant's family or any other person on the premises with the tenant's consent. If a tenant terminates wrongfully, the tenant shall remain obligated under the rental agreement 57 [ij_J§ 5505. Tenm1t's obligation relating todefective conditions • (al Any ~~ eondltlOCI Of the pnimhiea which_, to ttlt ttnant's attention, and whleft ~ ttnant hn ntaaon to bellt11t 11 tn• duty Of the l11ndlord or of anoth•r tnant to ...pair, 1hd be ..poitad In wrtllng Dy th4I tvnant to the landlord aa 110Qn H It ptaetfcabl9. The tenant ahal be l'ffPOMllblt ror any ff•blllty or Injury ra1ultlng to tllt l;mdlord ... a raault of t11t ttnant'• hHura to timely Nport •11eh eonCltaon. • (bl A t•n•nt on whom 11 compl1lnt In ajeccm.nt or lln •dlon 119aln•l tha preml1t1 II Hl'Ylld ah1U lmmedlataly n(ltlf'j ti!• landlord In wrttlng. • C) The pravla!Qn• of ttllt Hetlon ahall not apply whar11 ltlt ""ill!Ord hat 11ctual notlc. of the defactlvt condition 58 fg] §5514... • •) 1'IHo P•'l'O .. Of lht ffCUlllV de~ll ohall ba: -V - C1) T& rotm"-t Ill• llMIOl'CI for t~uol d•llWGH aauaod to the pramf•ff lilt ltnlilll wltfoh o•c•od na.,...l w.u and *Nr, or Wlllch Ctnnol be comaa.d by palnUnt •nd ortUM""1cl••nin•t1n4lor - (1) To pay lhl landklnl kit l~ _,,..,.._.duo wndot the rantAI •IJ.ndoNMnt Df thtl rwntll •grMment •y '" ..n&... li ~nd/or •-nt. lfti:l~dlnQ t• "'""'"" and """''du•'"',,_.,..,.,.lt...,....fion <>r - (3) To ralmburH th• i.111110111 ror •11 NHOllillbM *"fl*n- ln•urnd In ..""..una Ind rtNnlk\O Ille p1Wmi•H OOUHd by"" P"lllllUN l•l'llth\llliOrl af th• rontAI •l'"llllnUy tho l•nonta, ""lah lneludu l•nnln•~n Pli"•.,,l lo§ 5314 al thl1111111. prDvldlfti th.ol -b•"""'""' oau1ed by """"'"'"- purouant lot HU tlf W. "'l;o -..u not ,_,,d, monlft'• nn<. sg iul For abandonment: §5507 ... -- • (d) II lhe len ..nl wro1111111ny quill 1111 l't!lntalunll and u.,.qutyOQlly lndlc1tee by wOrdtl or de..i. Iii• wn•nr1 Intention not ID r11oume tenoncy, such ·~tk>n b~ Ila len1nl •ll•tt entillelhe lendlonl ta Pf"';e9d ae epec1nec1 elaawhero In this ~h;!111er Mel ttle tenant,.. .. , bo hble fOf tht 1-er of the follow1nf1 lot audl •bandonmelll: • (1) Tile •ntlre renl-flor'!lllNmel11derDflh• mnn ..nd tl<P9n•1 for actual da11111gos cous91lb~ tt..1 ten•nl (otllftrthall norm.lwmr and 1o..r~ which arv Incurred In prepll'l"il the rental imlt 1or •MW l•Mnt: 61' • (2J All r.nl a.c ciued cturtng the period rv-bly nec. .ury to rt.l'*nl tho pnnnlau • • ttlr rental; plu1 Ille dlfo...,nca ~ 8'1cll 111r renlll end me Nnt agreed lo In Uut prior nlfll..l 191"ff1111nt: ptue .,.,,... ... lnclmM 1o ~nl; rwp111r d•l!'llO• ~•u•Dd by th• 111n~n1 (b&yond nonnal WHr 1nd teat); plH • rvaollllbl9 c:ommlaelon, II Mtu,...d by th• lmdlord for 1111 rwenung Of thtt prvmlllw. In 1ny event. 1111 1111donl h,.. • dufy to mH1111t1 de!MgH Go IT:ll § 5513. Landlord remedes relating to breach ofrules and covenants • (a) II Iha tlllnant brat<:hin •nY Nie ~ coven•nl wlllch hi matorilll lo the rori•-4 ~51•nment, U.. landlotd aholl nalfy the ••ruilll l;lf IUCh bnt•ch In writing, .lll1d •h"M alloW 11 IHel 7 daye al'ltt e...:11 nolloa far ranady ar corncHon of lllft bteach. lhia soofion sholl fl<ll •Pt>IY to lahi paymant of ront wtol~'1 ho cov.rvcl undtr§ U02 or thla UUll. • (1) Suell llatk:e shall •ub.ton•l•Nr 1pec:lly fl• rul• dlflldlY lirelehed and advlsa th• t.n.,t U...1, If 1119 vlolaton eont~.,.. - 7 da", 111' landl"'rd may i.rmlnete lht rtnlllagrtlt'llttlt tlld bring an action larMtmrnary poHeMIOfl, SUCh ll~lica •h•l •o mt.a lhat it le given ,,..,,....,,to lhl• ••:don, ind II !ht ttnanl comml~ a 1ub1111nUtlly alr'llllar breach wllhht 1 pu, th• 1ana1on1 may 111~ upon eueh nottc• ae gt0unds lor lnllJOllng an action far summary paHMllOfl. 61 fOl • The IHu<11nce of a notice pYrsuant to this section does not BStabllsh that the lnltl111I bre,ch of the rental agreement actually occurred for pulJJOHB of this Hctlon. • (2) If~ wnint'g breach can be remedied by the landlord, 11s by cleaning, repairing, repl111clng ;11 damaged item or the like, the landlord may so remedy the tanant'a breach ;1nd bill Ute ~nant for the actual and reasonabl11 cD11t& or such remedy. Such bllllng shall be due and payable as additional rent, Immediately upon receipt. &2 lo J§ 5513. Landlord remedies relating to breach of rules and covenants cont... 8

• l:J) IF en• temurt'• bnt11ch of a rule or QOYtn•nt ar.o conetltute• • nwt11r1a1 brHch Of an obllgatlon Imposed upon ttnantt l>Y • m11nldp;il, county or •Ute code, ol'dl111nc• ot at.lute, the landlord m•y t•rmlmita th• rental agreement fnel bl'lng an .ctlon f()f' summary poHaHlon. • (bl Whan a braach by 1 ttnant cauHt or thraatan• to e•llH lrrtpatabla henn to any pe,.on or ptoparty, or the tenM1t la convicted of a els" A, ml1111.,,.anor or felony duitng tht ttrm Of tht tan11ncy which cauHO or ttll'Hltl19d to c.ouse lmip• ..b'- h•nn to any pw.on or property, ttt. l•ndlord may, without notice, romedy "" IU'HCh and bnl the tenant•• provlOtd In 1ubs11ctlon (a) of thla •eGtlon; lmmtdlataly hlrmlnate Iha rant.JI •greement upon notice to the tenant •nd bl'lrlg an action for aumm•ry pot11ulor1; ot do bath. 63 igj PLEASE NOTE ..•. t THIS IS AN EXCEPTIONAl.LY IMPORTANT PART OF THE CODE, THIS IS THE ONL.Y IECTIOH WHERE YOU 00 NOT NEED TO GIVE THE TENANT AN OPPORTUNITY TO CURE. • THERE DOES NOT NEED TO BE AN ARREST (AlTHOUGH THAT WtL.L. ALWAYS HEl,P) YOU SIMPL.Y HAVE TO PROVE THE CONDUCT OR FAILURE TO ACT CAUSED Oft lliEA.TENED TO CAUSE THI! HARM. • REMEMBER TO LOOK FOR OTHEI\ CODE VIOLATIONS LIKE HOUSING CODE&, OR LOCAL ORDINANCES. 64 l_g I YOUR CHOICES: • C) Upon notice to tenant, the landlord may bring an action or proceeding for waste or for breach of contract tor damagvs suffered by the tenant's willful or negligent failure to comply with tenant's responsl blllties under the preceding tection. The Ian dlord may request a forthwith summons. 65 (E.ij 9. Terminating a Rental Agreement GENERAL RULES AND EXCEPTIONS • To *"'1ntti9 a ... ~ mgrHmant written notice It rtqUll'ff by both parllae. If Iha landlord lnt.nd• to nat ranaw or ttrmlnatt at tM Hplratlon then th• landlord muat gl'll* th• tenant written notice, 10 day• Ill lldvancm of th• axpl~on of tM yealty cont..ct. If the ranral •greement II monthly, then the landlord mutt gin th• tanant 60 d•y• notlet 111 wntlng, and th.t notice •tll'UI to run on th• flm day of the fnllowtng mont.,, • If Iha tenant lnwnel• to ttrmlnllla, the same gent"'I rui. applltt. Tha tenant muat give the ltlndlotd SO dily• written notl~t. A tenant mav illao glva the landlord a ttmiin•tlon notlc• at laaat "& day• prior to tl'lt elttdlve data on a renewal wttl'I modlflcalil;ln•. 66 IDI CHANGES TO CODE SINCE OUR LAST SEMINARlllllll • There have been significant changes to the section which allows a tenant to terminate w!tJl 30 days notice. 61 ID I § 5314. Tenant's right to early termination .. . •I EJCGtpt 11 It ottt.rwllle provided In thl• P•rt, WMMVtr tlthar party to a nint.JI ,91".,,.nl 110htfully lllacta to tennl1141te, th11 dutiea of each party under tht rental agreement ah.all ca1111e and aH PtrtlH ahall thereupon dlacharga •nll remalnlnCJ oblltatlon• H aoon H la Pl'lotlcllllt. • (bl Upon :ID daya'Mittan notice, which 30. . V PtrlOd than b•gln on tha 1atday oftht month following the day or •ctu•t noli<:•, th• t.nancv may be htnnlnmted: - 111 By 11'1• tana"t. ..,..Wlft•r" c:hanga In locauon ont•• "'"""l's empluyRMnt with the ten1nt'a 11i...n11e in the locatlari <>f !IN l4mant'a ,.. ldtno in •~GOH of 30 mllu ; fl"**""' •"'!'bY•r r.ciulrH a 68 fg] EARLV TENANT TERMINATION - (2) By the tenant, whenever the HrlOUI Illness of the tenant or the death or serious illnes9 of a member afthe tenanrs lmmedt.w t.mlty, residing thtiirein, requires a change In the lo~on of the tenanra rvsldence on a pennanent basis: - (3) By the tenant, when thtl lllnant ts ~eeepted for admission to a Hnlor clttzens' housing facility, Including subsidized publlc or prlvale housing, or a group or coope...ttve llvlng faclllty or nttirement home; 69 IQ) § 5314, Tenant's right to early termination cont .. - 141 8y th• tenant. W111n the tenant le ice~ Jof adMhilalan intn • ..rr1.1 unit .ubaldlzed by • govemmen111 entity DI' by 111 priwl• 11Qnprom corpor•llon, lllcludln9 eul!eldized pit••I• or public hou•lng; - 1$) Gy th• tenant Wl'lo, 111« Ille •~•cutlon or au.:h 11111!.ol ·~...,.nt, •nhlrs 111<1 mllltary IHfVlce of 11'1• Unll&d Stale& on actl.. duty; - Ill ly • 19nan1 who 111111 ylqttm o( d!!ma•UG 1byt11 vxull oft!ftttL !l!!!!!!!!o 6' • !!nmh•ho h!I obl!dntdor !1 tnklnq 1101! 1nHJ1 d91Dtttlc vlollDCI Qf abMff ftqm IDY GQUd pplp IAtflC)f. tJt dlH'n6*tJG violenctt proa~m or Hryk:tt GC • fYI By the aurvMng 1pouae or paraCIMI Npteltnllllllt Of the Hlata Of the ttlnilln~ upon ltit .,.....,, d the 1-nt 70 !QI More on Early Terminations • Paragraph (6) Is the paragraph that wlll be new to many of you. This section was 9

changed and now allows a new category of individuals to terminate their rental agreement early. •To understand this section you must understand that definitions that govern this section. They not only define the words they al90 Impose duties upon parties by the language used. 71 Lo I § 5141. Definitions • '1110 foH-1119 wordli, i..ma •nd phn•H•, 'When ueecl In lhl• Pert, 1h.otl ....,, lhtme•nlnga UCl'llMld to Uti11'n In It.I• •~tlon, •~~1111 whel'I Iha conto.1tl c~y lndk•C.• • dttt.rwnl meaning! .... • (B) .Dorn6811C abuoe" llhall nMen •nY act ar thre1l 1pl11et a vidm Df dQ!n.511<: M>uH or v101enco lhal elltior c;on..1"1•5 • crltM under Dol1w1tt law or any oci or th..11 Ur•t '10fl..itutM domelltlc vlolMH:• or dnnw•ll~ llluH u d1nnea 111ywr..re In 11• Delowar<1 CQd•, Pomtl!!G @MIO Ul'I bt verified by an of!ld1! documtPI· tl!Sb H •court order. or by 1 !!1!1b!1 thlUI p1rty !>!Of...lonal. lnc!vslnq 1 ~tl!ltl\lM!!llty or cfflc•r 1 lfomn!lc ylo!tnct or dpmtt!fc alkaaa aorvlc• 1ITT1vld1C or h11llh cart ,OfOYidef'. It It Jhe mn..s!c YIO!tru:t or •bljlt vteilm'a reop>nolbll!ty to !!!!!vldt !ht 111!11l!o •llttment fl'tlm the rd.obit !h!nl Piety, n l.g I How it is defined • (26) The terms "sexual offens11s" and "stalking" shall here have the same me;tnlngs as in Title 11. Stl\Ual offenses and sbllklng can be verified by an official document, gych as a court order. or bv a reliable third party profeislonal. Including a law enforcomont aaencv or officer. a sexual auault service proVfder. or health care provider. It !1 th& sexual assault or stalking victlm's reso<>nslbillt)' tQ provide the reliable statement from the reliable third eartv. 73 fCl] Protection for domestic abuse • We just discussed ace eptablu ruasons for early termination, now we will discuss a setles of new rights created by the code. •New affinnativu rights for certain tenants. • The nell;t section oft he code creates new right for tenants that will prevent you as a landlord from taking certain actions. • You must be aware of the limitations or you could tisk significant penalties. 741 U I § 5318. Protection for victims of domestic abuse, sexual offenses and/or stalking • l•I A l1ncllord ~ not pu .. u1 any •ctlon for 1ummlt'y po1HHlon, demand 1ny lnere.1 .. In rent, d•CllJ4H 1ny Htvlcn, or atharwlH c.a u-. 1ny 11tn1nt 10 quit a r1111tal unit where •.id ttnant It a vk:tlm of domestic ab••· Hii:ual vffilnH•, or stalking, llJtd where Hid ttn1nt hU obtained or hn aought ntlttanct ror domHtic abuae, •e•11•• ott.nsH, or .ulklng from •ny eourt. pollC., nladk:al emargoncy, domttlk: vloltnco, w Hxual off&nue PfOijrem OI' urvtca. • (bl If tilt tttltnt provv1 that the lllndlold lnttltuttd any oftha action• praltlblted by lllbHCtlon (•) ofthl• aectlon, 1bov•, within 90 dayt1 of any Incident In which tilt t.nant wu • victim of domeldc 111Use, ••ii:ual olfe...," incl/or 1talkln9, H •hall be • rebut tabit prHumptlon that ad lldion la In violation Of 1uboc:llon (•)of thl• •~on, lbOft, • fc) A landlord may .. but the p""umptlon that Iha pmhlbltad action It In vtotatlon Of •ubeactlon (a) of thlt H~on, above, If: - (1) Tho lf.ll(llorcl It HOklng to rvcov.,. pDllHttlon of tilt 1'91'1bl unit on the 1>aai. of'" •PPfOPriate nollce to tannln8'o ~II WH lllv-.i to th9 tenant prtor to the lneldtnt of dome1tlc abuH, aexual off•na••, or tt.llklng; ~ (2) The l1111dlord tHkl In 9ood filllh lo nocover "'"'"ulon of th• rtntal unit for lmm&dlM9 UH H th• landlOnl'• own raldenee; - (3) The landlord seek& in good faith to recover possession of the rental unit for the purpose of substantially altering, remodeling or demolishing the premises; - (4) The landlord seeks in good faith to recover possession of ttu,, rental unit for the purpose of immediately terminating, for at least 6 months, use of the premises as a rental unit; 77 [Q] § 6316. Protection for victims of domestic abuse, sexual offense& and/or stalking cont. • ISi 'i'ii• .-10n1 ha& In 9DCM1 f11tll convaclld llo Ml Ille pnil*l'f and tt\e cot11nd6f aaJe coctlelne a rap•aael'llltlot1 ftM"o Iha pu~hUlll' connrmlng hi• or hll' Intent 10UH111• prcperty In con111t1ncy with panigrapha (Zt.13) or (4) of 11111 1 .. baocllon; _ fB) Tll6 landl6td h•a IMICDmt llabla for o aubaunU1l l11erHH In property llXH or a 1ubelailflal lnCl'6He ~ other mai...U.nmnto• er Of*'allng ccillo. 1nd tucb lliblllly DCCUrred not I•• lllan 4 lllCICllha prtor to the dtmllld for tM Inc,._ Ill rent. •lld lho lnctMH 11'1 1'611t dtlH Ml. li<Cted the prlM'8la po- Of !M Mt lncl'OUO In 11•1 04' coal: _ (7) TI\tl i.tldlOt'd hH coinpleled a oubtltlltltl capita! lmptoritllollt Of Iha tenlll unH e.r the pr0porly !If which it I• •part, nat less 10

th•n •month a prior lo Ille dl!lm.,d J;ir lnc .. ned Nnl, •nd •Uch llll:nlll•• In ..nt doH nal excead lfto • ...,..,.,.which 11111y be d•med for r•dal'lll lncame '*" pyrpo1.s .,. a atralght~lno dtptKtallon Qf lh• Improvement, pro.ralDd •mi;in11 lll1 rvntal unite b1neflti.d by Ille lmptovi!lm"'1t; 78 [Ei I New limitations on tenant relations - (BJ Tllo landlord """ •1tllbU1h, by compeMlll evldt!in~, th11t th1 Nnt now d111111nd«I af Illa tanant ..,., not 111~ lhe rent cnerged othe1tmnant•af1lmll•r Nntal unlk 111 Iha Hr'n• oampl.,;; - (II The landlord o;an •1lllllU1n, DY competent evld11n~•. thmt th• dQm..tlc abuae, eeaual ••sault •ndlor 1i.lklng conelltulbe a vlabla and substmntlal 11.ii of .enoua phyalcilll Injury ID• tmrwnl who currently realdae in another unit at the ..me multl-vnll bUlldlllg H Iha dDmll""k; vlol9nc., MJlUal IBHUll 01 etalking vlc\lm: or - (10J The landlord, llfter IMlng ,,1van Mllca of lhtl .....,n\'1 vlc•mtzallon perf 6141(1J 01(28) of tlil• 1tt11, d11c:anllnuea thoal!I action• prohlbli.;l by 111ba1d1on (eJ of thla aactlon, •bav•. 79 J LJ I Your strongest defense •(d) A tenant who is otherwise delinquent in the payment of rent may not take advantage of the protection provided in this section. so IPI Trouble areas I want to shift to specific areas of concern and then answer some more questions from the audience. There are two specific areas I want to address: Your form SO's and Court of Common Pleas appeals. ! s1 DJ Recent updates you should be aware of BEFORE you go to Court s2 lc:Jl Court of Common Pleas Appeals • Du& lo ~ senes Of ,.i::41nt decisions In tile Court of Common Pi4;1$, you mU31 be carel1.JI Whal you ask fer wh1;111 you 8PP8EI" for 11181. 11

This certificate certifies that Roy Sudler. Jr. has participated in The Tenant Landlord Code Review on July 24, 2012 at PolyTech Adult Education Center in Woodside, DE with instructor Michael Morton, P.A. ~ I Training sponsored by DE NAHRO "'-:l.-d <a-:~-·--== Pam Ferguson, DE NAHRO President

I t" I • In House Ministric I 'I For Jesus Christ No Limils, No Boundaries, Nothing But Increase 'ORDER OF SERVICE ~~==.!g w~i-p::::::::w:=·) Sunday Evening Oellverance .....8:00PM Pra,..,. ThUl9. Nigh- Sludy... . 7:30PM Friday Joy Night . . , ......7:00PM Fot.ndlr&P91b"adtrOIWT~ ~Dr.llonnl9llgeilcMo A~laToruTuchf -~~- 302-430-3300 ' ) • .,., <4' . ••

-- -- ...

C.AR__ wASN DN P3 RJ

·- --

. , ~ .. .