Page 1
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
APRIL 24, 2018 - 6:00 P.M .
C ITY HALL C OUNCIL C HAMBERS, 15 LOOCKERMAN P LAZA, D OVER, D ELAWARE
P UBLIC COMMENTS ARE WELCOMED ON ANY ITEM AND WILL BE PERMITTED AT APPROPRIATE TIMES. W HEN POSSIBLE,
PLEASE NOTIFY THE C ITY C LERK (736-7008 OR E-MAIL AT C ITYC LERK@ DOVER.DE.US) SHOULD YOU WISH TO BE
RECOGNIZED.
LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
AGENDA ADDITIONS/D ELETIONS
1. D OWNTOWN D OVER B USINESS IMPROVEMENT D ISTRICT (BID) B UDGET AND ASSESSMENT (T AX) R ATES FOR
F ISCAL YEAR 2018-2019
(S TAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED BUDGET AND ASSESSMENT (TAX) RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR
2018-19, AS PRESENTED)
2. ADJOURNMENT OF LEGISLATIVE, F INANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION C OMMITTEE MEETING
SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
AGENDA ADDITIONS/D ELETIONS
1. D ELAWARE D EPARTMENT OF T RANSPORTATION (D ELDOT) P ROJECT UPDATES
A. S ENATOR B IKEWAY
B. B RADFORD S TREET S TREETSCAPE
2. P RESENTATION BY THE D OVER/KENT C OUNTY M ETROPOLITAN P LANNING O RGANIZATION (MPO) - D OVER
C APITAL G ATEWAY P LAN AND D ESIGN B OOK
3. R EQUEST FOR LETTER - D OVER/KENT C OUNTY M ETROPOLITAN P LANNING O RGANIZATION (MPO) S UPPORT
FOR A S ERVICE R OAD TO THE G ARRISON T ECHNOLOGY P ARK AND ADEQUATE A F ULL C ONNECTION WITH
R OUTE 1 (M R. ANDERSON)
4. UPDATE - S AFETY ISSUES AT THE LIBRARY (M R. LINDELL)
(T HIS ITEM WAS DEFERRED DURING THE MEETING OF MARCH 27, 2018 DUE TO TIME CONSTRAINTS)
5. O FFICIAL R EQUEST FOR C OMPARISON ANALYSIS OF N ATURE AND S TATUS UPDATE: 2015, 2016 AND 2017
C OMMUNITY C OMPLAINTS AGAINST D OVER P OLICE O FFICERS (M R. S UDLER)
6. D OVER P OLICE C ADET P ROGRAM - D ISCUSSION OF O FFICIAL C ADET D UTIES R EQUIRED UNDER THE G RANT
(M R. S UDLER)
7. ADJOURNMENT OF S AFETY ADVISORY AND T RANSPORTATION C OMMITTEE MEETING
ADJOURNMENT OF C OUNCIL C OMMITTEE OF THE W HOLE MEETING
/TM S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\COMMITTEE-AGENDAS\2018\04-24-2018 CCW AGENDA.WPD
THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. PURSUANT TO 29 DEL. C. §10004(E)(2), THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO
CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, W HICH A RISE AT THE TIME OF THE MEETING.
Page 2
CITY OF DOVER
LEGISLATIVE FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
April 24, 2018
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT -
ASSESSMENT (TAX) RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019
Submitted by: Cheryl A. Bundek, AAS
INTRODUCTION
The Business Improvement District (BID) Ordinance adopted by City Council requires that Council
must adopt a BID budget and assessment every year. This report presents the proposed budget and
assessment for fiscal year 2018-19.
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT AND BUDGET
(A) Appendix D, Article III, Section 9(f) requires that a budget be submitted to City Council for
consideration and approval.
For your consideration, we have attached the FY 2018-2019 budget showing BID tax revenue
and the expenses charged against this revenue (Attachment A).
(B) For your consideration, we have also provided the tax calculation worksheet with
recommended rates (Attachment B).
REQUEST FOR ACTION
We request Council to approve the following budget for fiscal year 2018-19 Attachment A, and
Assessment (Tax) Rate for 2018-19 - Attachment B.
T:\BID Assessment Rates\FY19 BID MEMO TO COUNCIL.doc
1
Page 3
ATTACHMENT A
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
CASH RECEIPTS BUDGET FOR 2018-19
BID TAX REVENUE AND EXPENSES CHARGED AGAINST THIS REVENUE
ADMINISTERED THROUGH CITY OF DOVER
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET:
1. The amount hereinafter named aggregating Zero dollars, ($0.00) or so much thereof as may
be necessary is hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for economic
development purposes for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2018, and ending June 30, 2019:
REVENUE PROPOSED
Tax Revenue $0.00
EXPENSES
Personnel & Administration Expenses $0.00
T:\BID Assessment Rates\FY19 BID MEMO TO COUNCIL.doc
2
Page 4
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF DOVER
LEGISLATIVE FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
April 24, 2018
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT -
ASSESSMENT (TAX) RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET
JULY 1, 2018 TO JUNE 30, 2019
Zone are per the City of Dover Code Appendix D-Article III, Section 9(e).
ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 3 TOTAL
Aggregate Assessments $42,311,100 $70,449,900 $40,519,500 $153,280,500
Assessment Tax Rate per $100 - - - ---
Revenue Raised $0 $0 $0 $0
% Revenue Raised 0% 0% 0% 0%
Number of Parcels 133 135 45 313
Average Assessment $0 $0 $0 $0
NOTE: These figures were estimated per the 2015 reassessed values. The revenue percentages by
Zone are per the City of Dover Code Appendix D-Article III, Section 9(e).
T:\BID Assessment Rates\FY19 BID MEMO TO COUNCIL.doc
3
Page 5
To: Rich Vetter
The Dover/ Kent MPO
From: Shilpa Mallem, TYLI
Date: 6/14/2017
Re: Garrison Oak Traffic Study – Technical Memorandum
Introduction:
The Dover/ Kent County Metropolitan Organization (Dover/ Kent MPO) has tasked T.Y. Lin International
(TYLI) to conduct a traffic study along the roadways and intersections surrounding the Garrison Oak
Technology Park (Tech Park) in Dover, DE. The purpose of this Technical Memorandum (Tech Memo) is
to document the process and results of the traffic study including the existing and future traffic conditions
in the study area in relation to the development of the Tech Park.
Study Area:
The Garrison Oak Tech Park is located just east of SR 1, with its access located along White Oak Road. It
is a 389 acre property comprising of 15 lots slated for development. At the time of this study, there are three
developed lots in the park, Dover Sun Park (103.4 acres), Garrison Energy Center (86.4 acres) and the Uzin
Utz manufacturing facility. One additional lot (Advantech) is expected to be developed during 2017,
creating 60 jobs on site. The rest of the lot sizes range between 10 – 14 acres each.
The Tech Park is currently located just north and east of the SR 8 interchange along SR 1. Most of the Tech
Park traffic is assumed to use this interchange and the local roads on the west side of SR 1 to access the
Tech Park. Traffic accessing the Tech Park is expected to increase in the near future as additional tenants
occupy the vacant lots. The State of Delaware owns several parcels of land along the east side of SR 1 that
may be used to construct a roadway that would connect the Tech Park with the SR 8 interchange. Figure 1
shows the location of the study area.
White Oak Road: The section of White Oak Road in the study area is an east-west roadway, located east
of US 13 in the City of Dover, DE. According to DelDOT’s Vehicle Volume Summary 2015, White Oak
Road is classified as an urban local street carrying an Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) of 2,374
vehicles per day (vpd). It is a two-lane roadway carrying one 11’ travel lane and 8’ shoulder in each
direction.
Acorn Lane: Acorn Lane is a north-south roadway extending between White Oak Road and North Little
Creek Road, east of Dover, DE. It is classified as an urban collector carrying an AADT of 1,149 vpd. It is
a two lane road with one 11’ travel lane in each direction. There is an existing bike lane along the east side
of the roadway that extends about 2000’ north of its intersection with North Little Creek Road. Acorn Lane
currently acts as an access road for vehicles traveling along northbound (NB) and southbound (SB) State
Route (SR) 1 to access the Tech Park through North Little Creek Road and White Oak Road.
North Little Creek Road: North Little Creek Road (Little Creek Rd) in the study area is a part of the SR
8 corridor, east of Dover, DE. It is classified as a rural major collector with an AADT of 4,351 vpd. It is
also a two lane roadway with one 11’ travel lane and 8’ shoulder in each direction.
222 South Dupont Highway, Suite 103 | Dover, Delaware 19901 | T 302.724.8001 | www.tylin.com
Page 6
Garrison Oak Traffic Study
Garrison Oak Tech Park N
Study Intersections (5)
Figure 1: Study Area
Study Intersections:
White Oak Road at Garrison Oak Drive: White Oak Road intersects Garrison Oak Dr., the access roadway
to the Tech Park as a three-legged intersection, just east of SR 1 in Dover. White Oak Road comprises the
east and west legs of the intersection, while Garrison Oak Dr. comprises the north leg of the intersection.
There are no turn lanes or traffic control devices at this intersection. Field visits showed that the traffic
exiting Garrison Oak stops for the traffic traveling through on White Oak Road.
White Oak Road at Acorn Lane: White Oak Road also intersects Acorn Lane as a three-legged intersection,
with White Oak Road comprising the east and west legs of the intersection and Acorn Lane comprising the
south leg of the intersection. There are no existing turn lanes at this intersection. The traffic along Acorn
Lane approaching White Oak Road is controlled by a STOP sign.
Little Creek Rd at Acorn Lane: Little Creek Rd intersects Acorn Lane as a three-legged intersection with
Little Creek Rd comprising the east and west legs of the intersection, while Acorn Lane comprises the north
leg of the intersection. Westbound (WB) Little Creek Rd has one through lane and one right turn lane, while
eastbound (EB) Little Creek Rd has one shared through/left turn lane and one bypass lane. Acorn Lane at
this intersection has one shared through/left/ right turn lane, and is controlled by a STOP sign.
Little Creek Rd at SR 1 ramps: Little Creek Rd intersects the SR 1 SB off-ramp as well as SR 1 NB on-
ramp as three-legged intersections on either side of the SR 1 overpass over Little Creek Rd (see Figure 1).
2
Page 7
Garrison Oak Traffic Study
At both these intersections, Little Creek Rd comprises the east and west legs of the intersections, while the
one-way ramps comprise the north legs of the intersections. The SB SR 1 off-ramp comprises of a left turn
lane and a right turn lane, and is controlled by a STOP sign. At its intersection with SR 1 NB on-ramp, EB
Little Creek Rd has one left turn lane and one through lane, and WB Little Creek Rd has one shared
through/right turn lane.
Data Collection:
TYLI collected turning movement counts at the following five intersections in the vicinity of the Tech Park:
1. Tech Park entrance at White Oak Road
2. White Oak Road at Acorn Lane
3. Little Creek Road at Acorn Lane
4. Little Creek Road at SR 1 SB off-ramp
5. Little Creek Road at SR 1 NB on-ramp
The turning movement counts were collected between October 4, 2016 and October 13, 2016 during the
AM and PM peak hours on weekdays under clear weather conditions. These counts included car and truck
traffic traveling along the study roadways and intersections. No traffic issues or backups were noticed at
these intersections, or along the study area roadways during the field observations. Figure 2 shows the
existing turning movement counts at all five study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours.
AM(PM)
Figure 2: Existing Traffic – Turning Movement Counts
Existing Traffic Conditions:
The Tech Park currently has three developments, the Dover Sun Park, Garrison Oak Energy Company and
Uzin Utz facility that are operational and contribute to the existing field traffic counts. According to
information received from the City of Dover, an additional development, Advantech is scheduled to be
operational in 2017. This development will include office space for 60 employees. According to ITE’s Trip
3
Page 8
Garrison Oak Traffic Study
Generation Manual, 9th Edition, the Trip Generation information for a General Office Building (710) with
60 employees is:
Weekday AM Peak Hour:
Average rate of trips: 0.48*60 = 29 trips
% Entering: 0.88*29 = 25 trips
% Exiting: 0.12*29 = 4 trips
Weekday PM Peak Hour:
Average rate of trips: 0.46*60 = 28 trips
% Entering: 0.17*28 = 5 trips
% Exiting: 0.83*25 = 23 trips
This trip generation information was combined with the existing counts, and distributed proportionately
through the study intersections to generate the baseline conditions for the traffic analysis. Figure 3 shows
the baseline traffic conditions, which include all known development in the Tech Park at the time of the
study.
AM(PM)
Figure 3: Study Baseline Traffic – Turning Movement Counts
The baseline traffic counts were analyzed using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) 2010 for
unsignalized intersections. Table 1 shows the Level of Service (LOS) at each of the movements at the five
study intersections under baseline conditions.
4
Page 9
Garrison Oak Traffic Study
The HCS analysis and results show that there is no existing traffic congestion at any of the study
intersections during both the AM and PM peak hours, validating the field observations. All HCS worksheets
are included in Appendix A.
Table 1: Baseline Traffic Conditions – AM and PM hour LOS and delay
Proposed Development:
After the development of the Advantech property, the Tech Park is expected to have 11 additional lots that
would be available for development in the future. The square footage of the office/ working area for the
existing developments show that approximately 3.5% of the total lot area was used as office space.
Therefore, for the purpose of this study, it was assumed that 4% of the proposed lot area(s) would be
developed into office/ working space.
Applying factors provided by the ITE’s Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, the Trip Generation
information for an Industrial Park (130), the proposed AM and PM peak hour traffic was calculated as
shown in Table 2.
Proposed Traffic Conditions:
In order to study the traffic impacts throughout the development of the Tech Park, the proposed traffic was
analyzed for three future conditions:
1. Traffic impacts when 50% of the proposed lots have been developed (50% Build)
2. Traffic impacts when 75% of the proposed lots have been developed (75% Build)
3. Traffic impacts when all the proposed lots have been developed (100% Build)
The trip generation information for all three future conditions was adjusted accordingly and distributed
through the traffic network as shown in Figures 4, 5 and 6. The detailed trip distribution for each of the
future conditions is included in Appendix B.
5
Page 10
Garrison Oak Traffic Study
Table 2: Trip Generation information – Proposed Development
Garrison Oak Tech Park - Proposed Development
# of proposed lots: 11
Area of each lot: ~10 acres
Office space in each lot = 4%: = 0.04 * 43,560*10 17,424 sq. ft.
Total proposed office area =17,424 * 11 191,664 sq. ft.
Weekday AM Peak Hour:
Average rate of trips: 0.82 *191.664 = 158 vehicles
% Entering: 0.82*158 = 130 vehicles
% Exiting: 0.18*158= 28 vehicles
Weekday PM Peak Hour:
Average rate of trips: 0.85*191.664 = 163 vehicles
% Entering: 0.21*163 34 vehicles
% Exiting: 0.79*163 129 vehicles
AM(PM)
Figure 4: Future traffic conditions with 50% Build
6
Page 11
Garrison Oak Traffic Study
AM(PM)
Figure 5: Future traffic conditions with 75% Build
AM(PM)
Figure 6: Future traffic conditions with 100% Build
7
Page 12
Garrison Oak Traffic Study
Similar to the study baseline traffic conditions, the three future traffic conditions were analyzed using HCS
2010 to determine the critical movement LOS at each of the study intersections. Table 3 shows the LOS at
the critical movements at each of the study intersections under baseline conditions as well as the three future
traffic conditions. All HCS worksheets are included in Appendix A.
Table 3: HCS LOS under baseline and future traffic conditions
The results show that the delay gradually increases with the additional traffic at each stage of development.
However, as seen in Table 3, the delay would still be under acceptable conditions (below LOS D), provided
the rate of the future growth in development is consistent with the current trend.
Area development – L.D. Shank Property:
The City of Dover provided information on a potential development that is expected along White Oak Road,
to the east of the Tech Park, Triad Farms, LLC (L.D. Shank). The property is zoned as a residential
development and is expected to house approximately 400 equivalent dwelling units (EDU). According to
ITE’s Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, the trip generation information for a Residential Planned Unit
Development (270) with 400 EDUs is:
Weekday AM Peak Hour:
Average rate of trips: 0.51*400 = 204 trips
% Entering: 0.22*204 = 45 trips
% Exiting: 0.78*204 = 159 trips
Weekday PM Peak Hour:
Average rate of trips: 0.62*400 = 248 trips
% Entering: 0.65*248 = 161 trips
% Exiting: 0.35*248 = 87 trips
Since most of this traffic is expected to use White Oak Road and the two study intersections of Garrison
Oak and Acorn Lane, these traffic volumes were added to the volumes along White Oak Road during the
AM and PM peak hours, and distributed proportionately as shown in Figure 7 to determine the traffic
impacts on the study intersections. Table 4 shows the LOS at the study intersections for this potential future
scenario.
8
Page 13
Garrison Oak Traffic Study
AM(PM)
Figure 7: Future Traffic Conditions with L.D. Shank’s property
Table 4: HCS LOS under baseline, future 100% build and LD Shank Development
9
Page 14
Garrison Oak Traffic Study
Conclusions and Results:
Traffic analysis shows that assuming the Tech Park grows at the current rate, all study intersections in the
vicinity of the Tech Park are expected to operate at acceptable LOS when the Tech Park is completely
occupied and operational. However, if any of the proposed developments in the future expect to
accommodate a significantly higher number of workers than the current rate, a further traffic study would
be necessary to quantify the traffic impacts and mitigation measures. The traffic conditions along Acorn
Lane should also be studied at that time to determine the increase in volumes and the effects on the
surrounding communities. This study also recommends adding a STOP sign along the SB approach of
Garrison Oak Dr. at its intersection with White Oak Road.
While this report recognizes that a new connector road connecting North Little Creek Road to the Garrison
Oak Industrial Park is not required at this time based on current knowledge, it recommends that the City of
Dover include an alignment study (conducted by DelDOT) as a transportation component of their upcoming
Comprehensive Plan update. The report recommends that the study determine the feasibility of constructing
the connector roadway, and initiate preliminary design to reserve a corridor so the alignment is in place if
the roadway is warranted in the future.
10
Page 15
APPENDIX A
HCS WORKSHEETS
Page 16
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Garrison Oak
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Existing Conditions - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: Whote Oak Road North/South Street: Garrison Oak Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 11 33 70 0
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.42 0.78 0.60 0.79 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
15 78 0 0 88 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 0 5
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 0 0 5
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 15 5
C (m) (veh/h) 1459 976
v/c 0.01 0.01
95% queue length 0.03 0.02
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 8.7
LOS A A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 8.7
Approach LOS -- -- A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/27/2016 12:28 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k27EF.tmp 12/27/2016
Page 17
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Existing Conditions - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 39 25 12 63
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.75 0.78 0.60 0.69 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 52 32 19 91 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration TR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 29 5
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
48 0 12 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 19 60
C (m) (veh/h) 1513 817
v/c 0.01 0.07
95% queue length 0.04 0.24
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 9.8
LOS A A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.8
Approach LOS -- -- A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/27/2016 12:29 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kF00D.tmp 12/27/2016
Page 18
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection N Little Creek at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Existing Conditions - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 19 134 308 18
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.80 0.78 0.60 0.82 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
24 167 0 0 375 26
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 32 44
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.67 1.00 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 47 0 51
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 24 98
C (m) (veh/h) 1158 540
v/c 0.02 0.18
95% queue length 0.06 0.66
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.2 13.1
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 13.1
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/27/2016 12:27 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k95DD.tmp 12/27/2016
Page 19
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 NB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Existing Conditions - AM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 NB On-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 67 165 75 27
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.60 0.79 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
108 214 0 0 94 36
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 8
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT
v (veh/h) 108
C (m) (veh/h) 1455
v/c 0.07
95% queue length 0.24
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7
LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- --
Approach LOS -- --
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/27/2016 12:33 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k95DD.tmp 12/27/2016
Page 20
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 SB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Existing Conditions - AM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 SB Off-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 166 75
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.90 0.78 0.60 0.78 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 184 0 0 96 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration T T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 66 203
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 92 0 344
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LR
v (veh/h) 436
C (m) (veh/h) 892
v/c 0.49
95% queue length 2.74
Control Delay (s/veh) 12.8
LOS B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.8
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/27/2016 12:30 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k95DD.tmp 12/27/2016
Page 21
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Garrison Oak
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Existing Conditions - PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: North/South Street: Garrison Oak Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 4 66 63 0
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.42 0.78 0.60 0.79 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
5 157 0 0 79 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 1 3
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 1 0 3
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 5 4
C (m) (veh/h) 1470 911
v/c 0.00 0.00
95% queue length 0.01 0.01
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 9.0
LOS A A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.0
Approach LOS -- -- A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:02 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k96AD.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 22
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem Intersection White Oak at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period Existing - PM Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 61 55 10 56
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.60 0.69 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 61 70 16 81 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration TR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 57 9
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
94 0 22 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 16 116
C (m) (veh/h) 1454 800
v/c 0.01 0.14
95% queue length 0.03 0.51
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 10.3
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.3
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:59 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k1131.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 23
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection N Little Creek at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Existing Conditions - PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 52 334 171 27
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.80 0.78 0.60 0.82 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
65 417 0 0 208 39
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 30 19
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.67 1.00 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 44 0 22
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 65 66
C (m) (veh/h) 1319 430
v/c 0.05 0.15
95% queue length 0.16 0.54
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 14.9
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 14.9
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:57 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k4091.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 24
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 NB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Existing Conditions - PM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 NB On-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 184 131 124 71
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.60 0.79 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
296 170 0 0 156 94
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 8
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT
v (veh/h) 296
C (m) (veh/h) 1316
v/c 0.22
95% queue length 0.86
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5
LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- --
Approach LOS -- --
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:52 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kFB46.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 25
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 SB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Existing Conditions - PM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 SB Off-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 292 124
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.90 0.78 0.60 0.78 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 324 0 0 158 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration T T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 31 101
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 43 0 171
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LR
v (veh/h) 214
C (m) (veh/h) 786
v/c 0.27
95% queue length 1.11
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.3
LOS B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.3
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:55 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k70ED.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 26
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Garrison Oak
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 50% Build - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: Whote Oak Road North/South Street: Garrison Oak Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 79 33 70 9
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.42 0.78 0.60 0.79 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
114 78 0 0 88 9
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 4 18
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 4 0 19
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 114 23
C (m) (veh/h) 1448 861
v/c 0.08 0.03
95% queue length 0.26 0.08
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 9.3
LOS A A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.3
Approach LOS -- -- A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 11:59 AM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k37DB.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 27
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 50% Build - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 91 25 14 73
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.75 0.78 0.60 0.69 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 121 32 23 105 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration TR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 29 12
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
48 0 29 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 23 77
C (m) (veh/h) 1428 760
v/c 0.02 0.10
95% queue length 0.05 0.34
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 10.3
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.3
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 11:52 AM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k95A2.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 28
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection N Little Creek at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 50% Build - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 22 134 308 21
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.80 0.78 0.60 0.82 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
27 167 0 0 375 30
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 33 45
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.67 1.00 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 49 0 52
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 27 101
C (m) (veh/h) 1154 534
v/c 0.02 0.19
95% queue length 0.07 0.69
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.2 13.3
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 13.3
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 11:49 AM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kBED9.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 29
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 NB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed - 50% Build - AM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 NB On-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 68 166 76 27
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.60 0.79 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
109 215 0 0 96 36
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 8
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT
v (veh/h) 109
C (m) (veh/h) 1453
v/c 0.08
95% queue length 0.24
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7
LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- --
Approach LOS -- --
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 11:24 AM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k2F83.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 30
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 SB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed - 50% Build - AM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 SB Off-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 167 76
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.90 0.78 0.60 0.78 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 185 0 0 97 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration T T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 66 206
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 92 0 349
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LR
v (veh/h) 441
C (m) (veh/h) 891
v/c 0.49
95% queue length 2.80
Control Delay (s/veh) 12.9
LOS B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.9
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 11:50 AM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kAA2B.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 31
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Garrison Oak
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 50% Build - PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Garrison Oak Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 20 66 63 4
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.42 0.78 0.60 0.79 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
28 157 0 0 79 4
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 21 59
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 21 0 64
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 28 85
C (m) (veh/h) 1465 888
v/c 0.02 0.10
95% queue length 0.06 0.32
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 9.5
LOS A A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.5
Approach LOS -- -- A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:15 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k96AD.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 32
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 50% Build - PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 73 55 17 96
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.60 0.69 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 73 70 28 139 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration TR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 57 11
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
94 0 27 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 28 121
C (m) (veh/h) 1440 722
v/c 0.02 0.17
95% queue length 0.06 0.60
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 11.0
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.0
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:25 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k362F.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 33
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection N Little Creek at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 50% Build - PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 53 334 171 28
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.80 0.78 0.60 0.82 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
67 417 0 0 208 41
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 34 22
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.67 1.00 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 50 0 25
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 67 75
C (m) (veh/h) 1317 427
v/c 0.05 0.18
95% queue length 0.16 0.63
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 15.2
LOS A C
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 15.2
Approach LOS -- -- C
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:27 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k7355.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 34
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 NB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed - 50% Build - PM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 NB On-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 187 133 124 71
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.60 0.79 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
301 172 0 0 156 94
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 8
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT
v (veh/h) 301
C (m) (veh/h) 1316
v/c 0.23
95% queue length 0.88
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5
LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- --
Approach LOS -- --
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:31 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k3F1E.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 35
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 SB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed - 50% Build - PM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 SB Off-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 297 124
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.90 0.78 0.60 0.78 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 330 0 0 158 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration T T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 31 102
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 43 0 172
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LR
v (veh/h) 215
C (m) (veh/h) 784
v/c 0.27
95% queue length 1.12
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.3
LOS B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.3
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:29 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k85C0.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 36
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Garrison Oak
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 75% Build - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: Whote Oak Road North/South Street: Garrison Oak Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 108 33 70 12
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.42 0.78 0.60 0.79 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
156 78 0 0 88 12
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 5 23
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 5 0 24
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 156 29
C (m) (veh/h) 1444 825
v/c 0.11 0.04
95% queue length 0.36 0.11
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 9.5
LOS A A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.5
Approach LOS -- -- A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:07 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k37DB.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 37
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 75% Build - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 117 25 15 77
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.75 0.78 0.60 0.69 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 156 32 24 111 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration TR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 29 15
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
48 0 37 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 24 85
C (m) (veh/h) 1386 733
v/c 0.02 0.12
95% queue length 0.05 0.39
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 10.6
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.6
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:18 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kA8F6.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 38
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection N Little Creek at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 75% Build - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 24 134 308 23
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.80 0.78 0.60 0.82 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
30 167 0 0 375 33
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 33 46
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.67 1.00 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 49 0 54
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 30 103
C (m) (veh/h) 1151 531
v/c 0.03 0.19
95% queue length 0.08 0.71
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.2 13.4
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 13.4
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:19 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k1EF3.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 39
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 NB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed - 75% Build - AM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 NB On-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 68 166 76 27
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.60 0.79 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
109 215 0 0 96 36
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 8
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT
v (veh/h) 109
C (m) (veh/h) 1453
v/c 0.08
95% queue length 0.24
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7
LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- --
Approach LOS -- --
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:34 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k923A.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 40
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 SB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed - 75% Build - AM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 SB Off-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 168 76
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.90 0.78 0.60 0.78 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 186 0 0 97 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration T T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 66 207
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 92 0 350
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LR
v (veh/h) 442
C (m) (veh/h) 896
v/c 0.49
95% queue length 2.78
Control Delay (s/veh) 12.9
LOS B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.9
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:21 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kA460.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 41
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Garrison Oak
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 75% Build - PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Garrison Oak Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 27 66 63 6
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.42 0.78 0.60 0.79 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
39 157 0 0 79 6
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 30 82
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 30 0 89
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 39 119
C (m) (veh/h) 1462 874
v/c 0.03 0.14
95% queue length 0.08 0.47
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 9.8
LOS A A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.8
Approach LOS -- -- A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:42 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kAF9D.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 42
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 75% Build - PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 79 55 21 116
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.60 0.69 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 79 70 34 168 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration TR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 57 12
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
94 0 29 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 34 123
C (m) (veh/h) 1432 685
v/c 0.02 0.18
95% queue length 0.07 0.65
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 11.4
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.4
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:40 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kE0D2.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 43
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection N Little Creek at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed - 75% Build - PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 54 334 171 28
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.80 0.78 0.60 0.82 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
68 417 0 0 208 41
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 37 23
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.67 1.00 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 55 0 27
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 68 82
C (m) (veh/h) 1317 424
v/c 0.05 0.19
95% queue length 0.16 0.71
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 15.5
LOS A C
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 15.5
Approach LOS -- -- C
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:37 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kD108.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 44
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 NB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed - 75% Build - PM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 NB On-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 188 134 124 71
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.60 0.79 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
303 174 0 0 156 94
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 8
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT
v (veh/h) 303
C (m) (veh/h) 1316
v/c 0.23
95% queue length 0.89
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6
LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- --
Approach LOS -- --
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:32 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kDDA1.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 45
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 SB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed - 75% Build - PM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 SB Off-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 299 124
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.90 0.78 0.60 0.78 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 332 0 0 158 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration T T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 31 102
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 43 0 172
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LR
v (veh/h) 215
C (m) (veh/h) 783
v/c 0.27
95% queue length 1.12
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.3
LOS B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.3
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:34 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k8FDA.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 46
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Garrison Oak
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed -100% Build - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: Whote Oak Road North/South Street: Garrison Oak Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 137 33 70 15
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.42 0.78 0.60 0.79 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
198 78 0 0 88 15
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 6 29
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 6 0 31
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 198 37
C (m) (veh/h) 1440 796
v/c 0.14 0.05
95% queue length 0.48 0.15
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 9.7
LOS A A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.7
Approach LOS -- -- A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:49 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kCC72.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 47
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed -100% Build - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 143 25 16 82
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.75 0.78 0.60 0.69 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 190 32 26 118 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration TR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 29 18
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
48 0 44 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 26 92
C (m) (veh/h) 1347 702
v/c 0.02 0.13
95% queue length 0.06 0.45
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 10.9
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.9
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:47 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k9F9A.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 48
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection N Little Creek at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed -100% Build - AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 26 134 308 24
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.80 0.78 0.60 0.82 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
32 167 0 0 375 35
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 34 46
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.67 1.00 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 50 0 54
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 32 104
C (m) (veh/h) 1149 528
v/c 0.03 0.20
95% queue length 0.09 0.73
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.2 13.5
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 13.5
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:44 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k9B0B.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 49
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 NB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed -100% Build - AM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 NB On-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 68 166 76 27
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.60 0.79 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
109 215 0 0 96 36
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 8
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT
v (veh/h) 109
C (m) (veh/h) 1453
v/c 0.08
95% queue length 0.24
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7
LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- --
Approach LOS -- --
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:39 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k923A.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 50
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 SB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed -100% Build - AM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 SB Off-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 168 76
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.90 0.78 0.60 0.78 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 186 0 0 97 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration T T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 66 208
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 92 0 352
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LR
v (veh/h) 444
C (m) (veh/h) 896
v/c 0.50
95% queue length 2.81
Control Delay (s/veh) 12.9
LOS B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.9
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 12:42 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k6DD1.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 51
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Garrison Oak
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed -100% Build - PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Garrison Oak Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 34 66 63 7
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.42 0.78 0.60 0.79 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
49 157 0 0 79 7
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 38 106
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 38 0 115
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 10
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 49 153
C (m) (veh/h) 1461 850
v/c 0.03 0.18
95% queue length 0.10 0.65
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 10.2
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.2
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:45 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kAF9D.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 52
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed -100% Build - PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 85 55 24 137
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.60 0.69 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 85 70 39 198 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration TR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 57 13
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
94 0 32 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 39 126
C (m) (veh/h) 1425 652
v/c 0.03 0.19
95% queue length 0.08 0.71
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 11.8
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.8
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:48 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k4B15.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 53
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection N Little Creek at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Proposed -100% Build - PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 54 334 171 28
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.80 0.78 0.60 0.82 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
68 417 0 0 208 41
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 39 25
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.67 1.00 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 58 0 29
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 68 87
C (m) (veh/h) 1317 426
v/c 0.05 0.20
95% queue length 0.16 0.76
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 15.6
LOS A C
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 15.6
Approach LOS -- -- C
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:51 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kEC37.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 54
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 NB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed -100% Build - PM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 NB On-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 189 135 124 71
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.60 0.79 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
304 175 0 0 156 94
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 8
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT
v (veh/h) 304
C (m) (veh/h) 1316
v/c 0.23
95% queue length 0.89
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6
LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- --
Approach LOS -- --
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:55 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kBFB.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 55
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 SB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Proposed -100% Build - PM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 SB Off-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 301 124
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.90 0.78 0.60 0.78 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 334 0 0 158 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration T T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 31 102
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 43 0 172
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LR
v (veh/h) 215
C (m) (veh/h) 783
v/c 0.27
95% queue length 1.12
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.3
LOS B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.3
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/29/2016 1:54 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k171.tmp 12/29/2016
Page 56
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Garrison Oak
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Prop_100% Build_LDS_AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: Whote Oak Road North/South Street: Garrison Oak Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 148 33 229 18
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.42 0.78 0.60 0.79 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
214 78 0 0 289 18
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 7 30
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 7 0 32
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 214 39
C (m) (veh/h) 1210 582
v/c 0.18 0.07
95% queue length 0.64 0.21
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 11.6
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.6
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/16/2017 3:06 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kC45C.tmp 1/16/2017
Page 57
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Prop_100% Build_LDS_ AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 161 25 41 218
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.75 0.78 0.60 0.69 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 214 32 68 315 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration TR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 29 20
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
48 0 49 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 68 97
C (m) (veh/h) 1320 533
v/c 0.05 0.18
95% queue length 0.16 0.66
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 13.3
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 13.3
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/16/2017 3:00 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k4EAD.tmp 1/16/2017
Page 58
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection N Little Creek at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Prop_100% Build_LDS_AM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 26 134 308 26
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.80 0.78 0.60 0.82 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
32 167 0 0 375 38
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 45 60
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.67 1.00 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 67 0 70
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 32 137
C (m) (veh/h) 1146 525
v/c 0.03 0.26
95% queue length 0.09 1.04
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.2 14.3
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 14.3
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/16/2017 3:08 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k47E4.tmp 1/16/2017
Page 59
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 NB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Prop_100% Build_LDS_AM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 NB On-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 71 174 76 27
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.60 0.79 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
114 225 0 0 96 36
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 8
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT
v (veh/h) 114
C (m) (veh/h) 1453
v/c 0.08
95% queue length 0.26
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7
LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- --
Approach LOS -- --
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/16/2017 3:14 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kAB90.tmp 1/16/2017
Page 60
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 SB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Prop_100% Build _LDS_AM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 SB Off-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 179 76
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.90 0.78 0.60 0.78 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 198 0 0 97 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration T T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 66 210
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 92 0 355
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LR
v (veh/h) 447
C (m) (veh/h) 894
v/c 0.50
95% queue length 2.85
Control Delay (s/veh) 13.0
LOS B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 13.0
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/16/2017 3:10 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kB0AF.tmp 1/16/2017
Page 61
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Garrison Oak
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Prop_100% Build_LDS_PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Garrison Oak Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 35 227 63 8
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 0.42 0.78 0.60 0.79 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
50 540 0 0 79 8
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 40 116
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 40 0 126
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 10
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 50 166
C (m) (veh/h) 1460 700
v/c 0.03 0.24
95% queue length 0.11 0.92
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 11.7
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.7
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/16/2017 3:16 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kAD70.tmp 1/16/2017
Page 62
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection White Oak at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Prop_100% Build_LDSPM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: White Oak Road North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 225 55 27 152
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.60 0.69 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 225 70 44 220 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration TR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 57 34
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
94 0 84 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 44 178
C (m) (veh/h) 1266 576
v/c 0.03 0.31
95% queue length 0.11 1.31
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 14.0
LOS A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 14.0
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/16/2017 3:27 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k2F4F.tmp 1/16/2017
Page 63
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem
Intersection N Little Creek at Acorn Lane
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International
Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Date Performed 12/27/2016
Analysis Year 2016
Prop_100% Build_LDS_PM
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: Acorn Lane
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 68 334 171 35
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.80 0.78 0.60 0.82 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
86 417 0 0 208 51
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 42 25
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.67 1.00 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 62 0 29
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 86 91
C (m) (veh/h) 1306 396
v/c 0.07 0.23
95% queue length 0.21 0.88
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.0 16.8
LOS A C
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 16.8
Approach LOS -- -- C
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/16/2017 3:29 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kA7D8.tmp 1/16/2017
Page 64
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 NB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Prop_100% Build_LDS_PM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 NB On-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 192 135 126 71
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.60 0.79 0.75
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
309 175 0 0 159 94
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 8
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT
v (veh/h) 309
C (m) (veh/h) 1312
v/c 0.24
95% queue length 0.92
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6
LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- --
Approach LOS -- --
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/16/2017 3:33 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k2996.tmp 1/16/2017
Page 65
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst Shilpa Mallem N Little Creek at SR 1 SB
Intersection
Agency/Co. T.Y. Lin International Ramp
Date Performed 12/27/2016 Jurisdiction City of Dover, DE
Prop_100% Build_LDS_PM Analysis Year 2016
Analysis Time Period
Peak
Project Description Garrison Oak Traffic Study
East/West Street: N Little Creek North/South Street: SR1 SB Off-Ramp
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 304 126
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.90 0.78 0.60 0.78 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 337 0 0 161 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration T T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 31 107
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.60 1.00 0.40 0.71 1.00 0.59
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0 43 0 181
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 2 0 3
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LR
v (veh/h) 224
C (m) (veh/h) 782
v/c 0.29
95% queue length 1.18
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.4
LOS B
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.4
Approach LOS -- -- B
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/16/2017 3:31 PM
file:///C:/Users/shilpa.mallem@tylin.com/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k9D82.tmp 1/16/2017
Page 66
APPENDIX B
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Page 67
Existing Traffic Conditions
Garrison Oak
N (3) (1)
63 (56) 5 0 0 (0)
12 (10) 70 (63)
White Oak
(61) 39 (4) 11
(55) 25 29 5 (66) 33
(57) (9)
Acorn Lane SR 1
SB Off Ramp NB On Ramp
(19) (30) (101) (31)
44 32 18 (27) 203 66 27 (71)
308 (171) 75 (124) 75 (124)
Little Creek
(52) 19 (292) 166 (184) 67
(334) 134 (131) 165
Page 68
Proposed Development: Advantech
Garrison Oak
N (18) (5)
2 (15) 2 2 5 (2)
(3)
White Oak
18 (3) 20
2
Acorn Lane SR 1
SB Off Ramp NB On Ramp
(3)
2 2
Little Creek
(3) (3)
Page 69
Study Baseline Conditions: Existing Traffic + Advantech
Garrison Oak
N (21) (6)
65 (71) 7 2 5 (2)
12 (13) 70 (63)
White Oak
(61) 57 (7) 31
(55) 25 29 7 (66) 33
(57) (9)
Acorn Lane SR 1
SB Off Ramp NB On Ramp
(19) (33) (101) (31)
44 32 20 (27) 205 66 27 (71)
308 (171) 75 (124) 75 (124)
Little Creek
(52) 19 (295) 166 (187) 67
(334) 134 (131) 165
Page 70
Garrison Oak Trip Generation and Distribution: 50% Build Out
Garrison Oak
N (48) (17)
10 (40) 12 3 7 (3)
2 (7) 0 (0)
White Oak
(12) 52 (14) 59
7 (0) 0
(2)
Acorn Lane SR 1
SB Off Ramp NB On Ramp
(3) (4) (1)
1 1 3 (1) 3
1 (0) 1 (0)
Little Creek
(1) 3 (5) 1 (3) 1
(2) 1
Page 71
Garrison Oak Trip Generation and Distribution: 75% Build Out
Garrison Oak
N (71) (26)
14 (60) 17 4 10 (5)
3 (11) 0 (0)
White Oak
(18) 78 (21) 88
10 (0) 0
(3)
Acorn Lane SR 1
SB Off Ramp NB On Ramp
(4) (7) (1)
2 1 5 (1) 4
1 (0) 1 (0)
Little Creek
(2) 5 (7) 2 (4) 1
(3) 1
Page 72
Garrison Oak Trip Generation and Distribution: 100% Build Out
Garrison Oak
N (95) (34)
19 (81) 23 5 13 (6)
4 (14)
White Oak
(24) 104 (28) 117
13
(4)
Acorn Lane SR 1
SB Off Ramp NB On Ramp
(6) (9) (1)
2 2 6 (1) 5
1 (0) 1 (0)
Little Creek
(2) 7 (9) 2 (5) 1
(4) 1
Page 73
Future Traffic Conditions - with 50% Proposed Buildout
Garrison Oak
N (69) (23)
75 (111) 19 5 12 (5)
14 (20) 70 (63)
White Oak
(73) 109 (21) 90
(55) 25 29 14 (66) 33
(57) (11)
Acorn Lane SR 1
SB Off Ramp NB On Ramp
(22) (37) (102) (31)
45 33 23 (28) 208 66 27 (71)
308 (171) 76 (124) 76 (124)
Little Creek
(53) 22 (300) 167 (190) 68
(334) 134 (133) 166
Page 74
Future Traffic Conditions - with 75% Proposed Buildout
Garrison Oak
N (92) (32)
79 (131) 24 6 15 (7)
15 (24) 70 (63)
White Oak
(79) 135 (28) 119
(55) 25 29 17 (66) 33
(57) (12)
Acorn Lane SR 1
SB Off Ramp NB On Ramp
(23) (40) (102) (31)
46 33 25 (28) 209 66 27 (71)
308 (171) 76 (124) 76 (124)
Little Creek
(54) 24 (302) 168 (191) 68
(334) 134 (134) 166
Page 75
Future Traffic Conditions - with 100% Proposed Buildout
Garrison Oak
N (116) (40)
84 (152) 30 7 18 (8)
16 (27) 70 (63)
White Oak
(85) 161 (35) 148
(55) 25 29 20 (66) 33
(57) (13)
Acorn Lane SR 1
SB Off Ramp NB On Ramp
(25) (42) (102) (31)
46 34 26 (28) 210 66 27 (71)
308 (171) 76 (124) 76 (124)
Little Creek
(54) 26 (304) 168 (192) 68
(334) 134 (135) 166
Page 76
Trip Generation and Distribution: L.D. Shank Property
Garrison Oak
N
134
25 159
White Oak
(140)
(161)
(21)
Acorn Lane SR 1
SB Off Ramp NB On Ramp
(5)
14 11 (7)
(2) (2)
Little Creek
(14) 11 3
8
Page 77
Future Traffic Conditions - with L.D. Shank's property and 100% Proposed Buildout at Garrison Oak
Garrison Oak
N
(116) (40)
218 (152) 30 7 18 (8)
41 (27) 229 (63)
White Oak
(225) 161 (35) 148
(55) 25 29 20 (227) 33
(57) (34)
Acorn Lane SR 1
SB Off Ramp NB On Ramp
(25) (42) (107) (31)
60 45 26 (35) 210 66 27 (71)
308 (171) 76 (126) 76 (126)
Little Creek
(68) 26 (304) 179 (192) 71
(334) 134 (135) 174
Page 78
DEPARTMENT OF POLICE
Chief Marvin C. Mailey 400 South Queen Street
Chief of Police Dover, Delaware 19904
302-736-7111
Fax: 302-672-1842
Dover Police Department Internal Affairs Citizen Complaint Statistical Summary
2015-2016-2017
Case Totals
This is a breakdown of the total number of cases received, completed, and sustained in 2015-2017.
Percent Percent
Incident Type Received Completed Sustained
Completed Sustained
Citizen Complaints 2015 14 14 100% 0 0%
Citizen Complaints 2016 5 5 100% 0 0%
Citizen Complaints 2017 19 19 100% 0 0%
Total 38 38 100% 0 0%
(Percentages are rounded to the next higher or lower number as appropriate)
Citizen Complaints 2015-2017
20
15
10
5
0
2015 2016 2017
Complaints Sustained
Page 79
PROCEDURAL NOTICE 46.1B
CADET PROGRAM
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this order is to establish standards for the administration and
operation of the Cadet Program, and its interactions with the other units within this
department and the citizens of the City of Dover.
II. POLICY
It is the policy of this department to provide cadet services to the citizens of the City
of Dover. The Cadet Program will assume high visibility patrol throughout the City of
Dover.
III. TRAINING
Prior to any assignments, Cadets will receive instruction and/or training appropriate
to the duties anticipated. Other such training is conducted one-on-one with an officer
assigned to perform such duties. Cadet training will vary from classroom to on-the-
job training.
IV. AUTHORIZED UNIFORM
In order to clearly distinguish Cadets from sworn officers, Cadets are authorized to
wear the SPECIAL EVENTS UNIFORM, described in Procedural Notice 22B 1V.4,
with the exception that their polo shirts are black and bright blue and black 5.11 rip
stop tactical pants.
V. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Cadets are NOT sworn officers and are NOT given the power of authority to make
physical arrests. Cadets shall have the authority to enforce City ordinance violations
and issue summons for these violations. Cadets shall not intentionally engage in
activities that may require the powers given to sworn officers, such as the use of
force or powers of arrest. This does not prohibit their ability to come to the aid of a
citizen, a fellow cadet, or a sworn officer in need of assistance as would any other
citizen or at the direction of a lawful order by a sworn officer. Cadets shall not be
assigned to perform law enforcement related tasks which require a law enforcement
officer without direct supervision of a sworn member of this agency. Cadets shall not
be assigned or authorized to carry any firearms while on duty. Cadets shall be
authorized to carry and will be assigned Tasers, after formal training has been
conducted by a certified Taser instructor.
A. Cadets will assist sworn members of this agency in accomplishing work
objectives to include:
1. Conducting foot patrol with the City of Dover limits
DEC 2017 PN 46.1B - 1
Page 80
2. Issuing Dover City Ordinance citations for violations observed for parking
and quality of life issues
3. Administrative duties
4. Assisting with crowd and traffic control at public events (i.e. music events,
fireworks displays, parades, and sporting events)
5. Assisting with crowd and traffic control at crime scenes, fires, traffic light
outages, and other unusual occurrences
6. Cadets may also be used as a resource for support services during
emergencies and large scale events in accordance with their scope of
authority
7. Any other related duties authorized by the Special Enforcement Unit
Commander or Immediate Supervisor.
VI. OPERTATION OF DEPARTMENTAL VEHICLES
Cadets may operate departmental vehicles ONLY if they are on duty, possess a valid
operator’s license, and directed to do so by a supervisor. Cadets are only permitted
to operate specialty vehicles for which they have received training. Vehicles
operated by any Cadet may ONLY be used for:
A. Transportation to and from maintenance facilities
B. Administrative purposes
C. Transportation to and from assignment locations
D. Special Assignment
VII. SUPERSEDES
This order supersedes all previous procedures, written and otherwise, not in
complete conformity herewith.
VIII. EFFECTIVE DATE
This order shall become effective upon execution and issuance. ORDER
EXECUTED and ISSUED this 5TH day of December, 2017.
__________________________
Marvin Mailey
Chief of Police
DEC 2017 PN 46.1B - 2