This text was pulled from the PDF automatically and may contain mistakes. The PDF is the official record, so check it before relying on this.
1 page has little or no readable text here, often scans or drawings. See the PDF for those.
Page 1
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
Tuesday, January 22, 2019 – 7:00 P.M.
City Hall, City Council Chambers
15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, Delaware
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF MEETING of December 17, 2018
COMMUNICATIONS & REPORTS
1) Reminder: The next Planning Commission regular meeting is scheduled for TUESDAY,
February 19, 2019 at 7:00pm in the City Council Chambers.
2) Update on City Council Actions
3) Department of Planning & Inspections Updates
a. Education and Training Opportunities
b. Report on Summary of Applications 2018
OPENING REMARKS CONCERNING MEETING PROCEDURES
OLD BUSINESS
1) Requests for Extensions of Planning Commission Approval: None
NEW APPLICATIONS
1) MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior
Living Residential & Townhome Option) - Public Hearing and Review of Amendments
to Revise the Pattern Book (Comprehensive Design Standards Manual) for the
Residential District component of the Traditional Neighborhood Design project known as
Eden Hill Farm TND. The Amendment presented as Pattern Book pages focus on
information for a Senior Living Residential & Townhome Options. The Residential
District consists multiple parcels totaling of 109.034 acres ± of land and is zoned TND
(Traditional Neighborhood Design). The project is located south West North Street and
Wemyss Road and southeast of the intersection of West North Street and Saulsbury
Road/POW-MIA Parkway. The owner of record for the unbuilt area of the Residential
District is Eden Hill Residential, LLC. Tax Parcels: Multiple parcels of the Residential
District on map ED-05-076.04. Council District 2. The current Implementation Plan SB-
06-03 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District Implementation Plan was granted
conditional approval on June 19, 2006 by the Planning Commission and there have been
other subsequent approvals related to lot layout and Pattern Book revisions. Related
Applications: SB-07-01, MI-08-03, MI-08-20, MI-09-03, MI-09-13, MI-10-04, MI-10-14, and
MI-10-20. A Revised Implementation Plan S-15-07 (with S-15-10) for the Residential District
was reviewed in 2015 but has not achieved plan approval.
NEW BUSINESS
1) Resolution honoring Dean Holden for his service on the Planning Commission
2) Nomination and Election of Officer (Vice-Chairman)
Page 2
City of Dover Planning Commission Agenda
Public Hearing: January 22, 2019
Page 2 of 2
3) Appointment to the Architectural Review Oversight Subcommittee of Planning Commission
(in accordance with Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 §2.28): Planning Commission Member
4) Project for Dover’s 2019 Comprehensive Plan
a. Update on Project Activities
ADJOURN
THE AGENDA ITEMS MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE
TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.
Posted Agenda: January 11, 2019
Page 3
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 17, 2018
The Regular Meeting of the City of Dover Planning Commission was held on Monday,
December 17, 2018 at 7:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers with Chairman Mr. Tolbert
presiding. Members present were Mr. Roach, Ms. Edwards, Mr. Holt, Mr. Baldwin, Dr. Jones,
Mrs. Welsh, Ms. Maucher and Mr. Tolbert. Mr. Holden was absent. (Mr. Holden arrived at 7:02
pm.)
Staff members present were Mrs. Dawn Melson-Williams, Mr. Jason Lyon, Mr. Julian
Swierczek, Mrs. Tracey Harvey and Mrs. Kristen Mullaney.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Ms. Maucher moved to approve the agenda as submitted, seconded by Mr. Holt and the motion
was unanimously carried 8-0 with Mr. Holden absent.
APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF
NOVEMBER 19, 2018
Mr. Holt moved to approve the Planning Commission Meeting minutes of November 19, 2018,
seconded by Mrs. Welsh and the motion was unanimously carried 8-0 with Mr. Holden absent.
COMMUNICATIONS & REPORTS
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that the next Planning Commission regular meeting is scheduled
for Tuesday, January 22, 2019 at 7:00pm in the City Council Chambers.
Mr. Swierczek provided an update on the regular City Council and various Committee meetings
held on December 10 & 11, 2018.
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that included in the packet for tonight was the Institute for Public
Administration’s Training Series. She believes that Ms. Edwards and Dr. Jones had indicated
their hope to attend a couple of trainings and she believes that they have been scheduled. The
next training session is scheduled for January 18, 2019 and it’s “Planning Your Community’s
Future.” They are going to talk about the basics of planning and things like Comprehensive Plans
and the like. The deadline is the day before. Some of these classes do fill quickly so if you have
any interest please let Planning Staff know and they will get you signed up.
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that also included in the packet was the Schedule of Meeting
Deadlines and Application Deadlines for 2019. Please mark your calendars for the Planning
Commission meeting dates.
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that there was another handout left on the desks tonight related to
the Senator Bike Way in preparation for what will be future project activities. This was received
this evening from the Public Works Office and Mr. Lyon is here if there are any questions.
Basically there is a segment of West Division Street leading towards the railroad tracks and then
turning up North West Street that will have within the next few months signage that indicates no
parking on the street in preparation for what will be bike and pedestrian improvements in those
1
Page 4
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 17, 2018
segments. It is a DelDOT project that is expected to start this Spring. Just to be aware, the
Senator Bike Way project is more than just one segment; so this is the segment that DelDOT will
be focusing on this Spring and Summer.
OPENING REMARKS CONCERNING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
Mrs. Melson-Williams presented the audience information on policies and procedures for the
meeting.
OLD BUSINESS
1) Requests for Extensions of Planning Commission Approval: None
NEW APPLICATIONS
1) C-18-05 Our Future Christian Childcare Center II at 614 South DuPont Highway – Public
Hearing and Review of Application for Conditional Use to permit conversion of an existing
4,300 +/- SF one-story building into a Child Day Care Center to serve 40 children. The
property consists of a 0.69-acre (30,000 +/- SF) parcel and is located on the west side of
South DuPont Highway, south of River Road. The property is zoned C-4 (Highway
Commercial Zone). The owner of record is Christian Life Center and the applicant is
Jacqueline Harris. Property Address: 614 South DuPont Highway. Tax Parcel: ED-05-
077.14-01-19.01-000. Council District 4.
Representatives: Mr. Anthony Harris & Mrs. Jacqueline Harris, Our Future Christian Child
Care Center
Mrs. Harvey stated that this plan is for the review of a Conditional Use Plan to permit conversion
of an existing 4,300 SF one story building into a Child Day Care Center to serve 40 children with
6 attendants. The property consists of over 3,200 SF and is located on the west side of South
DuPont Highway south of River Road. The property is zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone).
The owner of record is Christian Life Center and the applicant leasee is Jacqueline Harris. The
property address is 614 South DuPont Highway.
The existing building was previously utilized as a church. The applicant is not proposing any
renovations to the building. The proposed hours of operation are from 6:30AM to 6:00PM
Monday through Friday. A fence is proposed to surround an outdoor playground area in the rear
of the building. Child Day Care Centers require one parking space for every ten children and one
parking space for every adult attendant. Based on the number of children at forty and the number
of adult attendants at six, a total of ten parking spaces are required. The Site Plan indicates that
there are forty-seven existing parking spaces with two handicapped parking spaces located in the
rear of the property which is near the front main entrance located on the north side of the
building. The parking requirement has been met. There is a concrete island located along South
DuPont Highway dividing the site entrance and exit. On the front (east) side of the building there
is another concrete island with parking on both sides. There is not a particular area improved as a
sidewalk along the frontage; however, the area is paved. There is a sidewalk in the rear of the
building with no access to the building. The front and rear entrance to the building is located on
2
Page 5
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 17, 2018
the north and south sides of the building and the areas are paved leading to the building.
Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission prescribe the following conditions
and safeguards. The path of the pedestrian circulation to the outdoor play area from the building
should be identified. The implementation of additional crosswalk markings, site elements and
signage may be necessary in areas where the path of travel crosses parking areas or over a drive
aisle. Staff recommends a pedestrian crosswalk to be striped at the front entrance and exit points
of the site from DuPont Highway. Staff accepts the existing conditions of the parking lot and will
not require the installation of upright curbing. In the parking space locations there are existing
features that includes parking bumpers and fencing that limit vehicle travel.
Mr. Harris stated that they have already met with all of the participants in this project and they
agree and are working cooperatively with Staff to complete all of the necessities to create this
opportunity for this Day Care.
Mr. Harris shared a video with the Commission.
The video states “My name is Anthony Harris and I am a Master Corporal for Wilmington
Police. I have been a Police Officer for 26 years now and my wife and I decided two years ago
that we wanted to open up a day care that caterers and develops our kids and to prepare our kids
for school. The name of the day care is Our Future Christian Child Care Center. It is a Police
based day care and what that is, is every once in a while our Officers come in and interact with
the kids, develop a rapport with the kids. We also bring in Officers from different divisions to
talk about what we do in the community and we talk about our assignment. The first two months
that we were open my wife and I talked about it, I stayed out of the day care in uniform so the
kids were calling us Mr. Anthony and Ms. Jackie. Two months later, I walked in with my
uniform and the kids were very hesitant to interact with me. But a week later, the kids relate to
me as Mr. Anthony and realize that I am a human in uniform or out of uniform, that I am a
human that cares about our kids and that cares about our future. As I was walking through the
day care one day to leave, one of the kids said Mr. Anthony we love you and I was in uniform.
That is what is going to make a difference in our community.”
Mr. Harris stated that the reason he wanted to share that is because he is currently retired from
Wilmington Police. He retired in July 2018 and out of 28 years of law enforcement, what he
realized that there is a challenge today of our kids and interacting with current law enforcement
because of social media. What he realized is, as Police Officers we have to go back to our
community when they are young because the most influential age of our kids are as toddlers. He
currently has the opportunity to travel around the Country and talk to high school aged kids in a
program called The Law and You. What he is learning from talking to over 85,000 kids over the
last year and a half is why couldn’t this happen earlier? What he realizes is the concept that we
have and we’ve implanted for the last four years at Our Future Christian Child Care Center in the
City of Wilmington is the earlier that you interact with our kids, the more they understand, the
more they comply, the more they listen, the more they are waiting for direction. Those are some
of the issues that we deal with in our day care with some of our kids. Our goal is to open up
around the Country. As long as we can interact with the local law enforcement to get them to
interact this will change the future of our kids with their interaction with law enforcement as they
3
Page 6
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 17, 2018
go forward.
Ms. Edwards questioned what response was received from the local law enforcement agency?
Responding to Ms. Edwards, Mr. Harris stated that one of the other things that he has the
opportunity to do is be the representative for Police Department Insurance in the State of
Delaware. He has done a presentation for Dover Police and talked to the Chief about it. He said
to let them know when the day care center is open and they will cooperate. He has traveled to
Georgia, Texas and Florida and has spoken with people about the project and they can’t wait.
Mr. Roach stated that one section states that there will be services for children ages 2-6 and the
other side says ages 1-12. Is there a difference as far as what services are provided at certain
times or is it just after care of the kids who are older than 6? Responding to Mr. Roach, Mrs.
Harris stated that the at the center in Wilmington, they started at that age but the center in Dover
will be a little bit different. The Wilmington location is for ages 2-6 and the Dover location will
be for ages 1-12.
Dr. Jones stated that ideally children are in school from ages 6-12 so does your program provide
the educational opportunities and structure for school aged children? Responding to Dr. Jones,
Mrs. Harris stated that school aged children are only there in the morning and in the afternoon.
They will be there for before and after care but in the Summer they will be there full time for
Summer Camp.
Dr. Jones questioned if all of the funding will come from parent payment or do you get State
funding? Responding to Dr. Jones, Mrs. Harris stated that they would actually get both. They
would accept the Purchase of Care Program and then private pay.
Dr. Jones further questioned if they have experienced any issues regarding the separation of
church and State in terms of funding? She asks that question because of the way the brochure
speaks to the fact that it is a Christian environment and so forth. Responding to Dr. Jones, Mr.
Harris stated no, there are no issues with that.
Mr. Tolbert questioned if the site in Wilmington, DE is the only other site that you have?
Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Mrs. Harris stated yes.
Mr. Tolbert further questioned what is the involvement with the parents of the children?
Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Mrs. Harris stated that they do have opportunities where they have
some activities where the parents may come in for life skills training. They have some
opportunities where they do a Parent Night where the children come in with their parents and do
an activity. They don’t have a lot of them because unfortunately a lot of our parents are working
parents and they don’t have a lot of time. Around the holidays they have big dinners with the
parents and kids and they give out gifts. They also have a program where they give out turkey
dinners. For Thanksgiving, they were able to bless some families with dinners and during
Christmas time they normally adopt a couple of the families.
Mr. Tolbert questioned if the parents have any kind of parent organizations that deal with your
organization? Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Mrs. Harris stated no but that is something to look
4
Page 7
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 17, 2018
forward to doing.
Mr. Tolbert stated that the reason that he raises the question about parents is that parents are so
important of course and we have a lot of young parents who are not able to parent well and that
has a tremendous effect on the children. The way parents deal with children can make your job
easy or difficult. Responding to Mr. Tolbert, Mrs. Harris stated that is definitely something that
they can look towards. She will say that before opening up the child care center, she used to
work for a program called Parents As Teachers. She worked for that program for over ten years.
The program was to teach the early parents what they need to be doing with their children from
birth until they go to Kindergarten so she understands exactly where you are coming from with
that; it is very important.
Mr. Roach stated that his daughter used to go to King Christian Academy and they incorporated
the Christian values throughout the curriculum for the kids. Is that going to be the idea with this
center or is it just going to be essentially day care but it’s based on Christian values without
actually being incorporated throughout the daily things? Do you have prayer in the morning or
Bible lessons in the afternoon? He is just trying to get a general idea as far as how a day would
go at your day care center. Responding to Mr. Roach, Mrs. Harris stated that they use High
Scope as their curriculum. Each month they have a particular person in the Bible that they
highlight for the month or it may be a scripture. There is prayer every morning before they start
their day and of course we pray before we eat at things like that.
Mr. Tolbert opened a public hearing and after seeing no one wishing to speak, closed the public
hearing.
Mr. Holden moved to approve C-18-05 Our Future Christian Childcare Center II at 614 South
DuPont Highway, to include the recommended additional considerations on (DAC Report)Page
6 related to pedestrian circulation, sidewalk and upright curbing and that the applicant works
with Staff to resolve those issues. He thinks that it is in harmony with location, size and
character of the location request. He thinks that it is a service that we need in our footprint and
he thinks the applicants bring to them good experience and success in this matter. Seconded by
Mr. Holt and the motion carried 9-0 by roll call vote. Mr. Holden voting yes; for the reasons
stated. Mr. Roach voting yes; for the reasons previously stated. Ms. Edwards voting yes; based
on the applicant’s willingness to work with Staff and resolve the issues on Page 6. She also feels
that they are really providing a great service to the community and helping to guide and groom
our children when they are young and the most ready to learn. Mr. Holt voting yes; he thinks
that it is a real win win for the City of Dover and he thinks that it is going to be a really great
thing for the young people in our area. Mr. Baldwin voting yes; for all of the reasons previously
stated. Dr. Jones voting yes; for all of the reasons and conditions previously stated. Mrs. Welsh
voting yes; for all of the reasons previously stated. Ms. Maucher voting yes; for reasons
previously stated. Mr. Tolbert voting yes; the applicant has presented a very professional
understanding of the services that they provide and the need for those services. With their
understanding of the services that they provide and the success that they have had, he hopes that
they can help some of the local programs to reach the level of professionalism that they
presented here this evening.
5
Page 8
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 17, 2018
NEW BUSINESS
1) Project for Dover’s 2019 Comprehensive Plan
a. Update on Project Activities
b. Continued Review of Preliminary DRAFT Goals & Recommendations
c. Continued Review of Preliminary DRAFT Land Development Plan Map Series
d. Continued of Preliminary DRAFT Annexation Plan Map Series
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that as a reminder, they have issued Preliminary Drafts of the
Goals & Recommendations, the Land Development Plan Map Series and the Annexation Plan
Map Series. If you have questions or have comments on those, please share them with Planning
Staff. You can also point people to the website that was noted in the packet for the project. Staff
has continued to work on writing and they are actually going very thoroughly through the Goals
& Recommendations at the Staff level and there will recently be some refinement there. She will
be happy to answer any questions that you may have thought of since the last meeting on any of
those topics. Dr. Jones gave her some written comments on the Goals & Recommendations
tonight and they encourage that from all of the Commissioners.
They are still working towards the drafting of the text of the entire document. That will have to
go through a very formal review and approval process. They are not quite sure of the timing of
that as of yet but they intend to be done before summer. Hopefully by the next meeting they will
have a better sense of what their future timing will be related to the issuing of a Draft and getting
that out for its formal review and hearing process.
Meeting adjourned at 7:35 PM.
Sincerely,
Kristen Mullaney
Secretary
6
Page 10
City of Dover, Delaware
Summary of Applications
2017 2018
Application Type 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total
Board of
Adjustment
13 9 17 18 25 38 20 15 15 13 15 17 14 15 16 9 2 4 2 17 1 2 4 5 12
Annexations 2 3 5 6 10 4 3 1 0 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Conditional Use 2 8 8 9 8 7 14 8 5 7 6 11 6 4 5 1 1 2 2 6 1 2 1 1 5
Site Plans 37 37 33 39 49 66 43 29 33 23 20 21 24 16 24 10 7 8 8 33 3 2 4 3 12
Subdivisions 2 10 10 8 7 7 2 7 5 2 2 6 5 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 4
Rezoning 5 8 9 7 13 10 11 5 8 6 2 3 4 4 7 2 1 2 0 5 0 0 2 1 3
Miscellaneous 14 11 25 17 17 23 20 15 20 17 24 22 14 14 18 1 0 5 2 8 4 3 5 1 13
Unified Sign 1 2 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 2 2 3 1 2 4 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0
Historic District
Commission
6 11 7 3 9 7 4 4 11 5 7 5 6 8 6 0 2 1 1 4 0 1 2 0 3
TOTAL 82 99 114 108 138 163 120 85 97 75 79 91 74 66 83 23 14 23 17 77 10 12 21 11 54
*Summary as of 2018 yearend including applications received for the December meetings of the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment and
Historic District Commission and including Administrative Plan Reviews.
Page 11
City of Dover
DATA SHEET and APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
Consideration of Revised Pattern Book Guidelines
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING of January 9, 2019
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF January 22, 2019
Project: Eden Hill Farm – Traditional Neighborhood Design: Residential District
Revised Pattern Book: Senior Living Residential & Townhouse Option, MI-
19-01
Associated Plans: Eden Hill Farm TND, Z-05-03
Residential District Implementation Plan, SB-06-03
Residential District Administrative Subdivision Plan: Record Plan and
Construction Plans, SB-07-01
Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District - Lot Revisions to Townhouses,
MI-08-03
Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District - Lot 1 Revision (Condominium
Lot to Duplex Lots), MI-08-20
Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Duplex Lot setbacks, MI-09-03
Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District - Lots 4 and 5 Revisions
(Condominium Lots to Townhouse Lots), MI-09-13
Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District - Revisions to Lots 2F, 2G, and 2H
(Minor Lot Line Adjustment Plan), MI-10-04
Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District - Townhouse Styles for Phase 2
and Pattern Book Revisions for Duplex Lots, MI-10-14
Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District - Phase 2 Lot Revisions, MI-10-20
Eden Hill Farm – Traditional Neighborhood Design: Residential District
Revised Implementation Plan, S-15-07
Residential District – Revised Active Recreation Plan S-15-10
Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Architecture Concept, MI-18-10
Application: MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND Residential District: Revised
Pattern book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse Option) –
Review of Amendments to Revise the Pattern Book for the
Residential District component of the TND
Location: Resident District: Area southeast of intersection Wemyss Road and
POW-MIA Parkway
Tax Parcel: Areas on map ED-05-076.04
Area of TND: 272.04 acres +/-
Area of Residential District: 109.2049 acres +/-
Zoning: TND (Traditional Neighborhood Design Zone)
P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903
Community Excellence Through Quality Service
Page 12
MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse
Option)
DAC Report of January 9, 2019
Page 2 of 12
Project Description (Review of Updated Submission of 1/11/2019):
This is the review of Amendments to Revise the Pattern Book (Comprehensive Design Standards
Manual) pertaining to the Eden Hill Farm TND Residential District. The first Pattern Book
Amendment is to establish standards for a Senior Living Residential Village of one-story single
family detached units. The second Pattern Book Amendment is for Townhouse Options relating to
architectural styles and lot format. An Updated Submission was received January 11, 2019.
The following report will provide background information on the Eden Hill Farm TND: Resident
District and Review the Amendments to Revise the Pattern Book.
Traditional Neighborhood Design Zone Process
The Zoning Ordinance, Article 3, Section 28 outlines the requirements for the Traditional
Neighborhood Design Zone (TND) including the development criteria and procedure. The first step
of the Traditional Neighborhood Design Zone is an application for rezoning to TND which includes
review of a Master Plan. The subject property Eden Hill Farm has achieved the zoning classification
of TND (Traditional Neighborhood Design) and approval of the General Overall Master Plan. Next
reviews of the Implementation Plans for each District of the TND for compliance with the approved
General Overall Master Plan occur. Then is review of Administrative Site Plans for individual
building development or Subdivision Plans for recordation of lots. For the Residential District, there
is an Implementation Plan in place and it has been previously amended.
Eden Hill Farm TND: Previous Application Reviews and Plan Approvals
The following provides a summary of the project review process to date for the Eden Hill Farm
TND: Residential District.
Date Application Plan Type Action Description
Number
June 20, 2005 Z-05-03 Rezoning Application Planning Rezoning to TND including
Commission acceptance of the General Overall
recommendation Master Plan and the Master
of approval for Comprehensive Development
rezoning to TND Standards Manual (Pattern Book)
with its Addendum of 6/9/05 for the
project in accordance with the
conditions of approval outlined in the
Development Advisory Committee
(DAC) comments
July 22, 2005 Z-05-03 Rezoning Application City Council Property rezoned to TND with
approval of General Overall Master Plan and
rezoning to TND Pattern Book
June 19, 2006 SB-06-03 Implementation Plan DAC May-June Implementation Plan and Pattern
– Residential District 2006; Planning Book Amendments
Commission
approval
2007 SB-07-01 Administrative Staff & Agency Residential District – Record Plan
Subdivision Plan Review and Construction Plan Set
September SB-07-01 Record Plan – Staff approval Record Plan: Sheets 1-6 with parcels
10, 2007 Residential District 9/6/07; Record and street layout
Plan recorded
Page 13
MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse
Option)
DAC Report of January 9, 2019
Page 3 of 12
Date Application Plan Type Action Description
Number
March 16, MI-09-03 Pattern Book Planning Reduced Duplex Building Restriction
2009 Revisions on Duplex Commission Line (setback) to 15 feet
Lots approval Pattern Book sheet (page 40) to be
3/16/2009 revised (Addendum IV)
October 26, MI-09-13 Record Plan Staff and Agency Record Plan recorded; Revised Final
2009 Revisions to Lots 4 Review and Construction Plan sheets
and 5: Condo into approval; Record
Townhouse Lots, Plan recorded
Construction Plan
revisions
March 3, MI-10-04 Record Plan Staff Review and Minor Lot Line Adjustment Plan
2010 Revisions to Lots 2F, Approval affecting three lots; Record Plan
2G, and 2H recorded
November 15, MI-10-14 Pattern Book Planning Request to continue use of Phase 1
2010 Implementation for Commission Townhouse Architecture Styles into
Townhouses and approval with Phase 2; Series of Pattern Book
Revisions for Duplex conditions on Revisions for Duplex Lots
Lots 11/15/2010 (Addendum V)
December 10, MI-10-20 Phase 2 Lot Staff and Agency Minor Lot Line Adjustment Plan to
2010 Revisions Review of Record reconfigure single units to duplex
Plan and units and revise townhouse lots from
associated Site 25 ft. width to 20 ft. width. Also,
Plan revisions; revisions to Site Plan for
Comments issued infrastructure construction.
February 22, MI-10-20 Phase 2 – Townhouse Planning Action to establish required side yard
2011 Interpretation Setbacks Commission setbacks for townhouses in Phase 2
consideration of area when more than two groupings
Pattern Book of building occur. Requirement to
Guidelines; PC complete a final version of the
action 2/22/2011 Pattern Book.
Record Plan of Record Plan of Phase 2 recorded and
Phase 2 area updates to Construction Plans of
recorded 3/1/2012 Landscape Plans and Utilities Plans.
May 18, 2015 S-15-07* Implementation Plan DAC April-May Revised Implementation Plan – Sheet
– Residential District 2015; Planning Submission of Concept Plan:
Commission Increase in dwelling unit count;
approval with Change in mix of unit types; Revised
conditions open space design; and Revisions to
5/18/2015 street layout
Check Print
Review in 2017
August 2015 S-15-10* Revised Active Planning Revised Active Recreation Area and
Recreation Area Plan Commission Open Space Plan to create large area
– Residential District approval with with clubhouse building and
conditions amenities
8/17/2015 Associated with S-15-07
Check Print
Review in 2017
*The most recent Revised Implementation Plan has not achieved Final Plan approval.
Page 14
MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse
Option)
DAC Report of January 9, 2019
Page 4 of 12
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SUMMARY
The Implementation Plan reviewed as SB-06-03 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District
Implementation Plan consisted of 665 dwelling units. The Plan Set for the Residential District
depicted the development and the associated elements such as the subdivision entrance access,
public street and alley network and street section design, pedestrian network, building sites, parking
areas, stormwater management, Active Recreation Area (parks and Community Center building),
open space and landscaping. As approved the development offered several housing types including
single family detached units in three styles: courtyard lots, carriage house lots, and cottage lots;
duplex units; townhouse units in four lot widths; and condominium units in two types: 12 unit
buildings and 24 unit buildings. The lot sizes were developed on a module system which would
allow for the mixing of unit types within a given street block. This Implementation Plan for the
Residential District received Planning Commission was approval on June 19, 2006 and Final Plan
approvals on September 10, 2007 (Record Plan) and December 10, 2007 (Construction Plan).
During 2008-2012, several revisions to the Residential District were made affecting the Record
Plan relating to lot revisions in the Phase 1 area including approvals for the subdivision of five
condominium lots into duplex and townhouse lots. The Record Plan (as revised and recorded in
2012) shows the Residential District consisting of a total of 651 residential units. (See Attachment
Record Plan sheet exhibit.)
*A Residential District REVISED Implementation Plan S-15-07 which focused on revisions to
create areas of multi-family (apartment) unit development was granted conditional approval by the
Planning Commission on May 18, 2015 for a Revised Plan consisting of 742 residential units
(single family detached units, duplexes, townhouses, and multi-family units), the redesign open
space areas, a community center, and revised street layout. This Revised Implementation Plan and
its Revised Active Recreation Area Plan was not finalized.
Comprehensive Development Standards Manual (Pattern Book)
As part of the Traditional Neighborhood Design process, the Implementation Comprehensive
Development Standards Manual (Pattern Book) consists of a written and graphic description of the
owner/developer’s proposed approach to each of the items listed in Zoning Ordinance, Article 3
§28.84. The purpose of the Pattern Book is to set the standards and guidelines for the design,
construction, and maintenance of the land and buildings in the Residential District. Any
development within the Residential District must comply with the Pattern Book.
The Pattern Book sets the guidelines for development within the Traditional Neighborhood Design
project acting as a portion of the code requirements for development. The Pattern Book is intended
to present the ‘general character’ of the project with the images in the Pattern Book giving examples
of the precedents to aspire to and concepts and guidelines of the new buildings to be constructed.
The Pattern Book describes the architectural precedents for each housing type in Section A:
Introduction. Then the Pattern Book in Section C: Community Patterns: Residential describes the
concepts for each housing type. These pages establish the standards for the building restriction lines
and porch restriction lines thus creating the buildable area on each lot; garage placement options of
detached and attached garages with alley access, etc. The Pattern Book in Section D: Architectural
Patterns describes the various design elements for the Residential District, specifically elements
including Windows & Doors, Dormers & Bay Windows, Porches, Materials, and Accessory
Page 15
MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse
Option)
DAC Report of January 9, 2019
Page 5 of 12
Structures. For each specific element, the Required, Encouraged, and Prohibited elements are given.
The approved Final Pattern Book for the Eden Hill Farm Residential District consists of the Eden
Hill Farm Pattern Book 1st Edition 5/6/2005 with Addendum I of 6/9/2005 and Addendum II of
5/5/2006; and by reference the Townhouse Lot Revisions of March 7, 2008 (Addendum III:
townhouse unit lot widths), Revised page 40 (Addendum IV: Duplex Building Restriction Line
revisions) of May 21, 2009, the Duplex Lot Revisions as approved by the Planning Commission on
November 15, 2010 (Addendum V), and Interpretation of Setbacks for Townhouse units by
Planning Commission on February 22, 2011. After consideration of multiple revisions to the
Pattern Book, the Planning Commission prescribed the requirement that a version of the Final
Pattern Book for the Residential District be prepared (this has not been completed to date). The
REVISED Implementation Plan S-15-07/S-15-10 Applicant was working to complete and fully
update a Final Version of the Pattern Book for the Residential District as part of its Check Print
Review process; however, it was never finalized. The complete Eden Hill Farm: Pattern Book and
Addendums submitted to date are on file at the Department of Planning and Inspections.
Construction Activity in Residential District
In Phase 1 of the Residential District, a total of 83 Building Permits have been issued and dwellings
completed. The predominate house type constructed has been townhouse units on 20-foot-wide lots.
The townhouse units currently built are a three-story unit with attached (included) garage and a two-
story unit with a detached garage. In Phase 1, the townhouse units have been constructed in groups:
one set of three units, 10 sets of six units, and 2 sets of seven units. Three sets of duplex units have
been constructed. A portion of the street network has been completed and dedicated to the City of
Dover. These streets include Lloyd Street, Wemyss Road, and portions of South Greenberry Lane,
Ruth Way, Ann Moore Street, and Ridgely Boulevard.
Other Activity Associated with Residential District
During 2017 and 2018 Planning Staff met with a potential owner and the housing unit developer to
discuss their proposal for continuation of the build-out of Eden Hill Farm TND Residential District.
Their proposal focuses on two concepts: an Architecture Concept for townhouse units and an
Architecture Concept for single family detached dwellings (in a 55+ community format). At their
June 18, 2018, July 16, 2018 and November 19, 2018 Meetings, the Planning Commission
discussed their concepts and noted the appropriate application and submission processes required.
Summary of Project Application to Revise Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential &
Townhouse Option) MI-19-01:
The Application submission included a Pattern Book document of a series of pages (Cover, Preface,
and Pages 1-6) titled Eden Hill Farm: Senior Living Residential & Townhome Option dated
December 7, 2018. There are two Amendments to Revise the Pattern Book of the Residential
District. (This will be identified as Addendum VI.) On January 11, 2019 an Updated Submission
was received and this Report reviews the most recent submission.
Amendment #1: SENIOR LIVING RESIDENTIAL VILLAGE
The applicant has proposed a Pattern Book Amendment to establish standards for a Senior Living
Residential Village. It is to consist of one-story single family detached units with front loaded
Page 16
MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse
Option)
DAC Report of January 9, 2019
Page 6 of 12
attached garages. It is proposed for the southern portion of the Residential District and it to include
the elimination of the rear access alleys. See Pages of 1-3 of Revised Pattern Book Submission.
The Pattern Book Amendment describes the concepts for the Senior Living Residential units as a
single family detached unit. These pages establish the standards for the lot width of 76 feet and lot
depth of 110 feet; standards for setbacks as the building restriction lines, porch restriction lines thus
creating the buildable area on each lot; garage placement as front loaded; and some architectural
characteristics for the unit style. Also provided are a series of images for the unit models showing
the front elevation of each house with its vehicular access from the street to a front loaded, attached
garage. One side elevation view is also shown. For this unit type, the garage appears to be the
primary element of the building that projects closest to the street; this garage placement format does
not comply with the current provisions of the approved Pattern Book.
Amendment #2: TOWNHOUSE OPTIONS (Style Additions)
The second Pattern Book Amendment is for Townhouse Options relating to architectural styles and
lot format. It presents townhouse unit type in a twenty (20) foot wide lot width in a front-loaded
format and rear loaded lot format. The front-loaded townhouse units are mentioned on the Preface
page and Page 5; however, there is not a lot layout shown. Alleys are the access point for the rear
loaded townhouse units. Townhouse units are shown in two-story and three-story building styles.
Off-street parking is an attached garage unit or a paved parking area. See Pages 4-6 of Revised
Pattern Book Submission.
The Pattern Book Amendment describes the townhouse units establishing the standards for 20-foot
wide lots; standards for setbacks as the building restriction lines, porch restriction lines thus creating
the buildable area on each lot; access/garage placement; and some architectural characteristics for
the unit style. Also provided are a series of images for a townhouse unit model as showing the front
elevation of each and a description of side elevation features.
A variety of lot widths are available for townhouse lots. The original Pattern Book only established
townhouse lots at a twenty-five (25) foot wide townhouse unit. Then in April/May 2008
(Application MI-08-03), the Planning Commission granted approval for a series of variations in the
unit types for townhouses, specifically the lot widths in the following variations: twenty (20) foot
wide townhouse lots, twenty-two (22) foot wide townhouse lots, twenty-four (24) foot wide
townhouse lots in addition to the twenty-five (25) foot wide lots. The Townhouse unit at a twenty
(20) foot wide lot width is already established.
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN
CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S
AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE.
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1) Pattern Book is intended to present the ‘general character’ of the project with the images in the
Pattern Book giving concepts and guidelines of the new buildings to be constructed. For a
Traditional Neighborhood Design project, the interaction of people in the environment is
Page 17
MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse
Option)
DAC Report of January 9, 2019
Page 7 of 12
important to help establish the sense of community through interaction opportunities i.e.
pedestrian movement, porches, open space, building placement, etc.
2) The Comprehensive Design Standards Manual (Pattern Book) is required to be updated to
reflect the various approvals by the Planning Commission including the previously approved
revisions.
a) The approved amendments from 2005-2012 are listed below:
i) Addendums I and II consist of text revisions throughout the Pattern Book.
ii) The document “Townhouse Lot Revisions” included the various lot widths approved for
the townhouse units (Addendum III).
iii) A revised page 40 presents the duplex setback options for the lot and setback (building
and porch) dimensions (Addendum IV).
iv) Duplex Lot Revisions and Interpretation of Townhouse Setbacks (Addendum V)
b) The Pattern Book pages related to Condominium units must be revised and updated to
discuss the requirements and design concepts for Multi-family units if items from the
Revised Plans of S-15-07/S-15-10 are being retained.
3) The Comprehensive Design Standards Manual (Pattern Book) is required to be amended to
reflect any changes recommended and approvals by the Planning Commission. Pages to amend
the Pattern Book must be submitted to document any proposed revisions approved by Planning
Commission. This information will be amended to the Final Pattern Book in order to maintain a
Final approved document to assist in the construction review process. This set of Revisions
would be identified as Addendum VI.
4) Townhouse Units are required to comply with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Article 5
§17 – Emergency Access Requirements. These requirements are outlined in Article 5 §17 (5)(a)
and the requirements depend on the number of units grouped together and their fire protection
status. The establishment of Townhouse Units on lots with rear alleys satisfies this provision.
a) The Applicant has verbally noted that all Townhouse units will have an alley; however, the
Revised Pattern Book Submission does not clearly present this. Any proposed Amendment
to create Townhouse Units without a rear alley access may appear to comply with these rear
emergency access provisions. There are provisions for the Planning Commission (and City
Council) to consider a waiver; a waiver request has not been received.
5) Consideration must be given to the location/placement of driveways to access lots with front-
loaded garages. Residential driveways are required to be a minimum of 9 feet in width and a
depth of at least 18 feet is required to park in the driveway and maintain passage along the street
frontage sidewalk. The placement of the house/garage may also limit the driveway depth.
Careful consideration of driveway location is also necessary to establish the ability for on street
parking. There are also provisions related to parking distances from street intersections, fire
hydrants, etc.
6) The current Pattern Book (with Addendums I-V) does not allow the garage to project closer to
the street than the massing of the house. This Amendment makes a request to allow that design
format of a front loaded garage closer to the street for the Senior Living Village only.
Page 18
MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse
Option)
DAC Report of January 9, 2019
Page 8 of 12
7) The following items are identified for addition, correction, or clarification following review of
the Revised Pattern Book document submission:
a) Cover:
i) Identified as Pattern Book associated with Residential District and be consistent with the
Amendment topic names in the document.
ii) This is considered as Addendum VI and the edition date will need to be updated as this
progresses thru review. The date should also be reflected in all page footers.
b) Preface:
i) Be consistent with the name for the Senior Living area.
ii) Clarify if a front accessed (no alley) Townhouse unit is proposed and update Pattern
Book as necessary. The Applicant has verbally indicated that the Duplex unit lot type
would be utilized where there is not an alley present.
iii) For Townhouse Units, the elimination of rear access alleys will require a waiver of the
Zoning Ordinance’s Rear Emergency Access requirements and specific design elements
(such exterior finishes, sprinklering, etc.). See Comment #4 above and Fire Marshal’s
comments.
c) Page 1 – Lot Types Senior Living Village
i) Add a written description of the Senior Living Village lot type and architecture; similar
to Section C in original Pattern Book for each unit type.
ii) Label the types of setbacks (Building Restriction Line and Porch Restriction line, etc.).
iii) Add rear setback dimension and label on corner lot.
iv) Add information on lot Landscaping (shrubs and ground covers) and Tree Planting
Requirements for this lot type (see Page 96 of original Pattern Book).
v) Identify minimum number of off-street parking spaces and how they can be achieved i.e.
garage, driveway. Provide details of garage types and driveways.
vi) Describe considerations for placement and details of driveways and mailboxes.
vii) Add reference to Section D: Architectural Patterns for Residential.
d) Page 2 and 3 – Senior Living Village
i) Note that the images shown are only examples of units and that there may be other
styles, elevations, and architecture which complies with the Pattern Book.
ii) Add description of provisions/conditions for front-loaded garages such as materials,
detailing, etc. Specific discussion of the scenario where the garage projects closer to the
street must be included.
iii) Add reference to Section D: Architectural Patterns for Residential where discussion of
materials and building elements are found.
iv) Add any specific provisions related to the requirements for the side elevations of Senior
Living units at street corners. The Revised Pattern Book presents one example side
elevation which is very plain (only two windows) and limited other detailing (i.e. no
watertable, trimwork, projections, etc.).
e) Pages 4-6 – Lot Types Townhouses
i) Add a written description of the new townhouse unit types.
ii) Clarify Townhouse unit format – Page 5 still shows an example of a front-loaded
Townhouse unit (with front parking pad). Clarify intent.
iii) See other comments about townhouse units without alleys. The front loading of
Page 19
MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse
Option)
DAC Report of January 9, 2019
Page 9 of 12
townhouse units results in concerns with limits on landscaping and tree planting, issues
with trash and recycling can storage, appearance of front elevation, on-street parking and
community interaction.
iv) Label the different setbacks (Building Restriction Line and Porch Restriction Line).
v) Note that the images shown are only examples of units and that there may be other
styles, elevations, and architecture which complies with the Pattern Book.
vi) Add reference to Section D: Architectural Patterns for Residential where discussion of
materials and building elements are found.
vii) Identify exterior finish and trimwork options for side elevations of two-story townhouse
units.
viii) Add requirements for landscaping bed on side elevation including number and size
of shrubs, etc. Trees could also be increased in this area also.
f) It is noted that compliance with the current Pattern Book provisions is required unless a
specific amendment is approved for an alternative requirement/provision.
8) Clarify that the presentations of the Senior Living units and the Townhouse unit type images are
examples for the elevations and lot layouts. Alternative designs (other than those pictured) may
also follow the Pattern Book guidelines. Administrative review of each proposed dwelling
unit/building will occur at the time of Building Permit submission to ensure compliance with the
Pattern Book.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
The TND option was designed and adopted to facilitate the development of a neighborhood of
mixed uses that encouraged walkability, human scale, exceptional design, etc. that was different
from the typical development patterns previously seen in Dover. It was intended to have an identity
and form that showcased how traditional neighborhoods developed historically while allowing
increased flexibility on the part of the developer(s) within the parameters and options set forth in
“design” documents (the Pattern Book and Implementation Plans).
1) Alley Access: Staff recommends that all lots with access to an alley (as shown on the
approved Implementation Plan) be required to take vehicular access only from the alley no
matter the unit type. This access pattern was clearly established in the intent of the
Traditional Neighborhood Design concept and the Residential District Implementation Plan
and approved Construction Plans for Eden Hill Farm TND. Alleys are intended to be service
and access areas.
2) Townhouse Units without Alleys: Staff does not support approval of the Townhouse Unit
type where no alleys are present. Lots that do not include a rear alley should be developed
with single family detached units or duplex units. The Revised Pattern Book document
includes some references and images to front-loaded Townhouse Units; whereas the
Applicant has indicated they will not be utilized.
3) Garage Placement: A series of new concepts for garage placement have been introduced
with this Pattern Book Addendum.
Page 20
MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse
Option)
DAC Report of January 9, 2019
Page 10 of 12
a) Special care must be taken to avoid the garage dominating the lot’s presentation to the
street and dominating the principal façade of the unit. In instances where front access to
the lot is required by the lot and street layout, efforts should be made to reduce the
prominence of the garage.
b) Staff supports the methods for garage placement on properties which places the garage
in a secondary position. The garage should be located to the rear of the building, setback
behind the building mass, or as a detached building as described on Pattern Book page
71.
c) If the Planning Commission wishes to approve the use of front-loaded garages on the
Senior Living units only, the Staff recommends the following design features be required
to be implemented: the installation of decorative garage door (carriage style, colored,
and with windows) and other detailing (trimwork, hardware, etc.).
d) Staff recommends for increased compliance of front-loaded garages with the intent of
the TND that the following design features be encouraged (or required): that ten feet of
building massing project closer to the street than the garage façade/elevation either in the
form of a porch projecting closer to the street or a floor plan design placing at least ten
feet of living space closer to the street.
9) Recommendations on Amendment #1 – Senior Living Residential Village: The following
comments are offered in regards to the establishment of Senior Living units. The
recommendations are made in order to maintain, to achieve and/or increase compliance with the
Pattern Book:
a) Corner lots are considered to have two street front facades and are important visual
elements. The building design should take advantage of the corner opportunity for design
elements to highlight the corner or side of the house.
b) See separate comments and recommendations about front-loaded garages.
c) Staff recommends the following detail revisions for the exterior finishes and elements of the
Senior Living residential units.
i) Add requirements for garage detailing when it is the predominant (closest to the street)
element i.e. color, format, hardware, etc.
ii) Encourage use of porches, bay/box windows, pent roofs, and entry portico roofs on front
and side elevations.
iii) Encourage trimwork details such as dental molding, heavier cornices, corner brackets,
wide trim around windows, wide corner boards, etc.
iv) Utilize other colors for the trimwork, door and window surrounds, gutters, etc. The detail
is lost and becomes flat in appearance when the trim color is just a color shade of the
building siding.
v) Utilize a variety of siding exposure details such as beaded, dutchlap, or clapboard siding
profiles or shakes/shingles forms.
d) Recommend using multiple models (house designs) for the construction of the Senior Living
units in the development. Reliance on even the four models (depicted in this submission)
will not create the true variation in housing that the TND concept aspires to be. Among the
models and associated elevations presented there is minimal variation in the options. The
front door remains in the same location for all units and the front façade pattern is
window(s), entry door, garage door.
Page 21
MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse
Option)
DAC Report of January 9, 2019
Page 11 of 12
e) Utilize a variety of architectural styles. The Pattern Book suggests Colonial Revival,
Bungalow, Arts & Crafts, Victorian, and Colonial styles (Federal, Georgian, etc.).
10) Recommendations on Amendment #2: Townhouse Unit Style - The following comments are
offered in regards to the additional Townhouse Unit Styles. Staff recommends the following in
order to achieve and/or increase compliance with the Pattern Book and the intent of the TND:
a) Staff encourages the use of a variety of townhouse unit types in varying lot widths (Existing:
20 feet, 22 feet, 24 feet, and 25 feet width units.
b) Staff does not support the use of front-loaded Townhouse Units.
c) Staff recommends utilizing variation in the number of units grouped together within a street
block such as groupings of three or four units. This may require revisions to the Record Plan
for the lot arrangements in some instances.
d) Corner lots are considered to have two street front facades and are important visual
elements. The building design should take advantage of the corner opportunity for design
elements to highlight the corner or side of the house.
e) Staff recommends the following detail revisions for the exterior finishes and elements of the
Townhouse units.
i) Encourage use of porches, bay/box windows, pent roofs, and entry portico roofs on front
and side elevations.
ii) Encourage trimwork details such as dental molding, heavier cornices, corner brackets,
wide trim around windows, wide corner boards, etc.
iii) Utilize other colors for the trimwork, door and window surrounds, gutters, etc. The detail
is lost and becomes flat in appearance when the trim color is just a color shade of the
building siding.
iv) Utilize a variety of siding exposure details such as beaded, dutchlap, or clapboard siding
profiles or shakes/shingles forms.
11) Staff recommends the following as a series of key concepts emphasized for the development of
Residential Units. Most of these concepts are further detailed in the Pattern Book (and approved
addendums).
a) Staff recommends that all lots with access to an alley be required to take vehicular access
only from the alley no matter the unit type. This access pattern was clearly established in the
intent of the Traditional Neighborhood Design concept and the Residential District
Implementation Plan.
b) Staff recommends utilizing variation in the number of units grouped together within a street
block such as groupings of three, or four units or up to a maximum of six units for
townhouse groupings.
c) Corner lots are considered to have two street front facades and are important visual
elements. The building design should take advantage of the corner opportunity for design
elements (architecture, detailing, and materials) to highlight the corner or end of building.
d) Staff recommends the increased use of porches or enhanced covered entries for main
entrances on the front elevations and/or side elevations of the residential units. All lots have
a designated porch restriction line that allows this element to be closer to the street than the
other portions of the building. Porches are key elements of the precedents for the District
and encourage interaction.
Page 22
MI-19-01 Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District – Revised Pattern Book (Senior Living Residential & Townhouse
Option)
DAC Report of January 9, 2019
Page 12 of 12
e) Staff encourages variation in the house architectural style and design, color, materials, and
detailing to detail to create the variations seem in the traditional residential areas of the City
and to avoid uniformity of design.
12) Pattern Book – Final Version for Residential District: Staff recommends the requirement of the
development of a Final Version of the Pattern Book for the Residential District as approved and
amended to date. Currently, staff must complete compliance review by accessing multiple
documents each with its own amendments (Addendums I-V and proposed Addendum VI). It is
very complex and will become even more so as the development progresses, involves other
builders, etc. Staff can make recommendations on the contents of a final edition document (i.e.
specific pages from the Master Plan Pattern Book and the associated addendums) for the
Residential District. Each of the other Districts in the Eden Hill Farm TND has a Final Pattern
Book.
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
1) Other agencies and departments which participate in the Development Advisory Committee
may provide additional comments related to their areas of expertise and code requirements.
2) If Planning Commission approval is granted to the proposed requests, the Pattern Book must
be revised to meet all conditions of approval from the Development Advisory Committee or
as otherwise noted to create a Final Pattern Book for the Residential District.
3) An Application for a Revised Implementation Plan must be submitted and reviewed by the
Planning Commission for the establishment of the Senior Living Residential Village. An
Administrative Plan Review Application may be utilized to subdivide (replat) the area
proposed with Townhouse Lots.
4) Each construction model/unit will be reviewed by Staff for compliance with the approved
Pattern Book through the Building Permit process.
5) In the event, that changes and revisions to the plan or Pattern Book contact the Planning
Office. These changes may require resubmittal for review by the Development Advisory
Committee, Planning Commission, or other commissions making recommendations in
regards to the plan.
6) The applicant/developer shall be aware that prior to any ground disturbing activities or start
of construction activities on the site the appropriate plan approvals, site inspections, Pre-
Construction meetings, and permits are required.
7) Additional coordination as related to construction activities will be necessary to minimize
the effect on the adjacent property owners and the adjacent roadway. During construction of
streets, the developer shall coordinate the required street light placement and electric utility
routing and equipment with the City of Dover Electric Department and in accordance with
the Pattern Book.
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above
contact person and the Planning Office as soon as possible.
Page 23
CITY OF DOVER
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
JANUARY 2, 2019
APPLICATION: Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District- Revised
Patternbook (Senior Living Residential &
Townhome Option)
FILE #: MI-19-01
REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric and Public Works Departments
CONTACT PERSON: Paul Waddell - Electric
Jason A. Lyon, P.E. – Public Works
CONTACT PHONE #: Electric - 302-736-7070 Public Works – 302-736-7025
T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN
A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE .
T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT :
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS
ELECTRIC
1. The roadway and curbing must be in.
2. The right-of-way must be within 6" of final grade.
3. The property corners must be staked.
4. Owner is responsible for locating all water, sewer, and storm sewer lines.
5. Owner is responsible for installing all conduits and equipment pads per the City of Dover Engineering Department
specifications.
6. Owner is responsible for site and/or street lighting.
7. Meter locations will be determined by City of Dover Engineering Department.
8. Load sheets and AutoCAD compatible DXF or DWG diskettes of site plans, including driveways, are required prior to
receiving approved electrical construction drawings.
9. Any relocation of existing electrical equipment will be engineered by the City of Dover Electric Department. Developer
may be required to perform a quantity of the relocation. Any work performed by the City of Dover will be at the
owner’s expense.
10. Prior to construction, owner is responsible for granting an easement to the City of Dover Electric Department.
Easement forms will be furnished and prepared by the City of Dover Electric Engineering Department.
11. Fees will be assessed upon final site plans. The owner will be responsible for fees assessed prior to construction.
Owner is required to sign off plans prepared by the Electric Department.
12. Must maintain 10' clearance around all electrical equipment, unless pre-approved by the City of Dover Electric
Engineering Department.
13. Prior to the completion of any/all designs and estimates, the owner is responsible for providing the Electric
Engineering Department with a physical address of the property.
14. All Engineering and design for Dover Electric will be engineered upon final approved plans. All Engineering work will
be furnished by the City’s Electric Engineering Department.
Page 24
Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District- Revised Patternbook (Senior Living Residential & Townhome Option)
File #: MI-19-01
January 2, 2019
Page 2 of 4
WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER / SANITATION / STREETS / GROUNDS
1. Our office has no objections to the proposed revisions to the patternbook.
2. The proposed subdivision plan for this Residential District will need to be submitted to and approved by the
Department of Public Works.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES
ELECTRIC
1. Owner must give the City of Dover Electric Department three (3) months notice prior to construction. Owner is
responsible for following the requirements outlined in the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. The handbook is
now available on the website at the following link: http://www.cityofdover.com/departments/electric/documents/.
WATER
1. All water utility components must meet the requirements of the Water Wastewater Handbook, effective date March 22,
2010. Please contact our office for more information.
2. The following notes must be added to the site plans:
a. Hydrant connections by the contractor are prohibited. This method may not be utilized during any phase of the
project.
b. Any existing water lines not to be utilized by the proposed facility must be properly abandoned at the mains in
accordance with the City of Dover Department of Public Works specifications and requirements.
c. The site contractor shall contact the City of Dover Public Works Construction Manager at (302) 736-7025 prior to
the start of construction. A representative from the City of Dover Department of Public Works must observe and
approve all City owned water and sanitary sewer interconnections and testing. All water taps must be performed
by a City of Dover approved contractor. The proposed location for the water connection may need to be adjusted
in the field due to conditions of the existing main. Possible conditions that would require tapping relocation
include proximity to pipe joints, other taps, concrete encasements, conflict with other utilities, and the like. Test
holes must be performed by the contractor to determine the best tapping location. The City of Dover will not be
held responsible for field conditions requiring adjustment of the tapping location or for any work required by the
contractor to make an appropriate and lawful connection.
3. The size, type, and location of all proposed and existing water lines and valves must be shown on the plan.
4. Water usage projections (peak demand or plumbing fixtures) must be submitted to our office to correctly determine
the size of the domestic and irrigation (if applicable) water meter for the proposed building. These projections must be
submitted prior to approval so the meter size can be placed on the final site plan. The proposed water meter must be
installed in a pit per City of Dover requirements and manufacturer’s recommendations. Also, a dual check valve is
required downstream of the meter.
5. The domestic service, fire main connection and valves must be clearly shown for each building. A valve must be
installed at the tee to isolate combined fire and domestic water service to the building from the water loop. Typically
this valve is installed at the tee or an acceptable distance from the building. A valve must be provided on the
domestic water service, which must be tapped off of the combined eight-inch (8”) fire/domestic service outside of the
building. The domestic water tap and valve should be as close to the building as possible. Typically, the domestic tap
and valve are located within five feet (5’) to ten feet (10’) of the building. A blow up detail of this layout is
recommended.
6. Provide a construction detail for the proposed restraining system for the fire main located within the buildings. The
Department of Public Works will test and inspect all fire mains to a blind flange located inside the buildings. The blind
flange with tap is used for hydrostatic pressure testing (200 psi for two (2) hours) and dechlorination. The flange must
be restrained in the direction of the pipe entering the facility. A pipe entering horizontally through a wall sleeve shall
be restrained with rods through the wall. A pipe entering vertically through a slab shall be restrained through the floor
to the ninety degree (90) bend and thrust block. All rods shall be a minimum of ¾” all thread. All pipes through walls
and slabs must be Class 52 cement lined ductile iron pipe. Confirm particulars to meet this requirement with
mechanical designer.
Page 25
Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District- Revised Patternbook (Senior Living Residential & Townhome Option)
File #: MI-19-01
January 2, 2019
Page 3 of 4
WASTEWATER
1. All wastewater utility components must meet the requirements of the Water Wastewater Handbook, effective date
March 22, 2010. Please contact our office for more information.
2. The following notes must be added to the site plans:
a. Any existing sanitary sewer lines not to be utilized by the proposed facility must be properly abandoned at the
mains in accordance with the City of Dover Department of Public Works specifications and requirements.
b. Part II, Chapter 180, Article III, Section 180-10 of the Code of Kent County requires that “no person shall
discharge or cause to be discharged any stormwater, surface water, uncontaminated groundwater, roof runoff,
subsurface drainage, uncontaminated noncontact cooling water or unpolluted industrial process waters to any
sanitary sewer”, this shall include condensate. Sec. 110-231 of the City of Dover Code defines storm sewer as
“…any system used for conveying rain water, surface water, condensate, cooling water or similar liquid wastes,
exclusive of sewage.” The contractor, developer, owner and designers shall ensure during construction that no
illegal discharges to the sanitary sewer system are created with the site improvements.
3. The size, length, slope, type and flow directions must be shown on all existing and proposed sanitary sewer lines.
Rim and invert elevations must be labeled on all sanitary structures, including cleanouts.
4. Cleanouts must be installed on sanitary sewer laterals within five feet (5’) of the building, one foot (1’) outside of the
right-of-way and at all bends. Any cleanout located within a traffic bearing location shall be installed with a heavy duty
cast iron frame and cover to prevent damage to the cleanout and lateral.
5. Sizing (flow) calculations must be submitted for all sanitary sewer laterals (other than for single-family dwellings)
showing that velocity and all other requirements are met.
6. The minimum size of all sanitary sewer laterals shall be six-inch (6”).
7. If kitchen facilities are proposed a minimum 1,000 gallon, two chamber grease trap, meeting all Kent County
ordinance requirements, must be provided. A construction detail for the proposed grease trap, as well as the
proposed location, must be provided on the plan.
8. Sanitary sewer laterals shall be connected directly to the main, not manholes, unless impracticable, as determined by
the Department of Public Works.
9. Per the Water / Wastewater Handbook, only one service connection shall be made to each building. If impracticable,
a waiver request may be submitted for review.
STORMWATER
1. Final site plan approval will not be granted until a copy of the approved Stormwater/Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan from Kent Conservation District is submitted to our office.
2. The size, length, slope, type and flow directions must be shown on all existing and proposed storm sewer lines. Rim
and invert elevations must be labeled on all stormwater structures.
STREETS
1. Final site plan approval will not be granted until a copy of the approved entrance plan, signed by DelDOT is submitted
to our office.
SANITATION / GROUNDS
1. None
GENERAL
1. All existing utilities shall be adjusted to final grade in accordance with current City of Dover requirements and
practices. This must be included as a note on the plan.
2. Trees shall be installed at least ten feet (10’) away from all underground infrastructure.
3. The final site plan must be submitted in the following compatible digital formats:
a. AutoCAD 2004 (.dwg format).
Page 26
Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District- Revised Patternbook (Senior Living Residential & Townhome Option)
File #: MI-19-01
January 2, 2019
Page 4 of 4
b. Adobe Reader (.pdf format).
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT
ELECTRIC
1. None.
WATER
1. The City of Dover water system is available to this site. The developer is responsible for all costs associated with
extending and providing service to the proposed development.
2. Prior to plan approval, the water system plans must be submitted to the Division of Public Health, Office of Drinking
Water for review and approval. The owner/developer will be responsible for providing all completed forms and plan
sets to the City of Dover as required for submission to the Office of Drinking Water. Plans will not be submitted to the
Office of Drinking Water until review has been completed by our office.
3. Hydrant flow testing is currently only performed during the spring and fall. The applicant must call the Department of
Public Works directly to schedule these tests. This applies to both existing hydrants as well as those proposed for the
site.
4. Water impact fees may be required for this proposed site plan.
WASTEWATER
1. The City of Dover sanitary sewer system is available to this site. The developer is responsible for all costs associated
with extending and providing service and capacity to the proposed development.
2. Prior to plan approval, the sanitary sewer system plans must be submitted to the DNREC, Division of Water
Resources, Surface Water Discharges Section for review and approval. The owner/developer is responsible for
providing all application fees, completed forms and plan sets directly to DNREC.
3. Profiles of the sanitary sewer main must be provided with the construction plans. All water, sanitary sewer and storm
sewer crossings must be shown on the profiles.
4. Wastewater impact fees may be required for this proposed site plan.
STORMWATER / GROUNDS / STREETS
1. None.
SANITATION
1. Every person occupying a residence or duplex and every owner of an apartment shall provide such premises with a
sufficient number of solid waste containers to provide adequate capacity for the solid waste placed out for collection
without overloading the capacity of the containers.
GENERAL
1. The applicant is advised that depending upon the size of the existing water service and sanitary sewer lateral to be
abandoned, flowable fill may be required.
2. Construction plans will not be reviewed by our office unless all previous comments have been clearly addressed
within the plan set and accordingly identified within an itemized response letter and with the Water/Wastewater Initial
Plan Submission Checklist, which can be obtained from the following website: https://imageserv9.team-
logic.com/mediaLibrary/198/WaterWastewaterHandbookFinal_1.pdf, page 88.
I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE
C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .
Page 27
C F
MI-19-01 I I
T R
CITY OF DOVER Y E
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE O M
F A
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
R
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: 01/02/19 D S
O H
V A
E L
APPLICATION: Eden Hill Farm TND: Residential District
R
FILE #: MI-19-01 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal
CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY, AND
COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY THE
APPLICANT:
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1. Proposed building is residential.
2. Emergency access to rear building areas compliant with City of Dover Code (Appendix B-
Zoning, Article 5- Supplementary Regulations, Section 17);
all four stories and greater buildings require 24ft fire lane at the rear.
All two to three story apartment structures require an 18ft Secondary Fire Lane at the rear.
All townhouses (3-8 units with no fire protection) require a 16ft alley or 18ft secondary fire lane
at the rear.
3. Street width shall be in accordance with City of Dover Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Article
VII, Section A. 13,
Residential areas
24 feet wide with no parking,
30 feet wide with parking on one side, or
36 feet wide with parking on both sides
Commercial areas
26 feet wide with no parking,
32 feet wide with parking on one side, or
38 feet wide with parking on both sides
Alley
12 feet wide
Any dead end road more than 300 feet in length shall be provided with a turnaround or cul-de-
sac as outlined in the 2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 705, chapter 5, 2.3.
Page 28
4. Speed Reduction Devices must be approved, please see City of Dover Ordinance Chapter 98-10 in
reference to this process.
5. Gated Areas: Fire Department access shall be provided to the property through the use of a
system or device approved by the Fire Marshal. The system or device required shall be located in
an area accessible to the fire department and approved by the Fire Marshal. All gates shall be
either automatic or manual.
An automated system shall consist of one manual and one automated means to open the gate.
The owner or their representative shall meet with the Fire Marshal prior to submission to agree
on the system. A letter of agreement shall be created, and signed by both parties. The letter shall
include a detailed description of both the manual and automated means.
A manual gate shall consist of one manual means to open the gate. The owner or their
representative shall meet with the Fire Marshal prior to submission to agree on the means to
open. A letter of agreement shall be created, and signed by both parties. The letter shall include a
detailed description of the manual means to open.
To be considered accessible for fire department apparatus the actual clear openings shall be not
less than 14 feet, the paved surface through the gate shall be not less than 12 feet, and the gate
shall be setback from the perpendicular street by at least 50 feet.
Please contact this office to discuss options available to comply with this requirement.
(2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 705, Chapter 5, 2.6)
6. All fire hydrants shall be marked as prescribed within the appropriate section of this regulation
and as illustrated by the appropriate figures of this regulation.
All fire hydrants shall have minimum of four-inch (4") solid yellow demarcation lines to define
specific areas, where fire hydrants are located along a curb line with permitted parking, the area
between the fire hydrant and the street or fire lane shall be stenciled with four inch (4")
demarcation lines and the words "NO PARKING", demarcation lines shall be measured from the
center line of the fire hydrant and extend for a distance 15 feet on both sides.
Where fire hydrants are located in parking lots or other areas susceptible to blockage by parked
vehicles they shall be treated as follows: fire hydrants shall be protected in all directions for a
distance of seven feet (7') with barriers or curbing, Minimum four-inch (4") diameter steel
bollards filled with concrete and marked yellow shall be installed at the outermost corners of the
fire hydrant demarcation area. The minimum height of the bollard shall be 36 inches above the
finished grade of the adjacent surface, and the steamer connection of all fire hydrants shall be
positioned so as to be facing the edge of the street, or traffic lane.
(2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations, 705, Chapter 6, 2)
The owner is responsible if the hydrant is private.
7. Hydrant barrels shall be provided with reflective material, such as paint, durable for
highway/roadway markings or a reflective tape of a minimum of 2” in width around the barrel
under the top flange, hydrant bonnets shall be color coded based on the following criteria: class
AA 1500 GPM - painted light blue, class A 1,000 GPM -1499 GPM - painted green, class B 500 -
999 GPM - painted orange, class C 250 - 499 GPM - painted red, class D under 250 GPM -
painted black.
(2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 703, Chapter 3. 4)
The owner is responsible if the hydrant is private.
Page 29
8. Every house, building or structure used or intended for use as living quarters or as a place for
conducting business, and having any wall facing or abutting any public or private street or alley,
shall have displayed on that wall, in legible, easily read characters which are of contrasting color
to the background, the proper street number for such house, building, or structure in accordance
with the following:
One-family and two-family residential structures, height, the number shall measure a minimum of four
inches in height, location, the number shall be placed on the house above or to the left or right of
the front entrance, color, the number shall be contrasting to the background color, Arabic numerals,
all numbers shall be Arabic numerals.
Multiple-family dwellings, measurements, the number shall measure a minimum of six inches when
identifying individual apartments with exterior doors, and 12 inches when identifying buildings
with apartment complexes where there are two or more buildings not assigned street addresses.
Individual buildings with street addresses shall have numbers measuring six inches, location,
numbers shall be placed either in the center of the building or on the street end of the building so
as to be visible from either the public or private street or from the parking lot, color, numbers shall
be contrasting to the background color, Arabic numerals, all numbers used shall be Arabic
numerals.
Commercial, industrial and office buildings, height, the numbers shall measure a minimum of 12 inches in
height, location generally, numbers shall be placed either in the center of the building or on the
street end of the building so as to be visible from either the public or private street or from the
parking lot,
property line or driveway, should the building be located far enough from a public or private road so
that the numbers are not clearly visible from the street, then the street address shall also be
posted on the property at or near the property line or driveway to said building,
color; each building, numbers shall be contrasting to the background color and shall be placed on
each building in the complex,
Arabic numerals, all numbers used shall be Arabic numerals,
Shopping centers. Shopping centers consisting of two or more stores shall have a tenant or suite
number affixed to the front of the tenant space and on the outside of the rear door which
corresponds with that tenant space. Numbers shall measure six inches in height.
(City of Dover Code of Ordinances, 98-344)
9. Project to be completed per approved Site Plan.
10. Full building and fire plan review is required.
11. Separate building permits/plans submission will be required for each building and/or tenant fit
out. If the permit submission is for a “shell” a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued.
Separate plans and permits submissions will be required for each “tenant fit out” at which time a
Certificate of Occupancy will be issued upon compliance/completion of each “tenant fit out”.
Each “shell” will require a fire permit for sprinkler and fire alarm if applicable. Those systems (for
the “shell”) must be accepted into service prior to any “tenant fit out” fire permits being issued.
Page 30
12. Construction or renovations cannot be started until building plans are approved.
13. Fire alarm systems, fire suppression systems, hoods, and hood suppression systems require a fire
permit from the Fire marshal’s Office. This work cannot be started until the permit is approved.
14. Building cannot be occupied by the public until a Certificate of Occupancy is obtained.
ADDITIONAL / SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS TO OBTAIN APPROVAL:
1. Ensure that the plan follows item # 2 listed above. Currently, I do not believe the
proposal is in compliance with item # 2. A sprinkler system and noncombustible
siding can be proposed in lieu of the rear access. If a sprinkler system is installed,
additional comments will be provided. If this option is chosen, a meeting needs to take
place with the Fire Marshal and Chief Building Inspector in reference to the same.
APPLICABLE CODES LISTED BELOW (NOT LIMITED TO):
2015 NFPA 1 Fire Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association)
2015 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association)
2013 NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association)
2013 NFPA 13 Installation of Sprinkler Systems (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association)
2009 IBC (International Building Code)
Latest editions of all other NFPA Codes as defined by the Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations
2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations
City of Dover Code of Ordinances
*If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above
contact person listed.
Page 31
Resolution
Whereas, Dean Holden became a member of the City of Dover Planning
Commission on June 25, 2012 and has served with diligence and distinction in this
capacity as an advocate for sound land use planning in the public interest; and,
Whereas, Dean Holden has played a key role in ensuring fundamental fairness
and careful forethought in the planning and development of the Capital City
through his service on the Planning Commission; and,
Whereas, Dean Holden has provided leadership on the Planning Commission
through his role as Vice Chairman of the Commission from July 2016 to December
2018 and through his service on the Architectural Review Oversight Subcommitee;
and,
Whereas, Dean Holden has influenced the pattern and appearance of development
in Dover through his contributions to the City’s 2019 Comprehensive Plan
Project; his efforts to ensure compliance with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan (as
amended); his participation in the development of amendments to the City of
Dover Zoning Ordinance regarding various zoning districts and development
design requirements; his knowledge of engineering topics; and his advocacy for
the implementation of pedestrian pathways and his attention to Silver Lake and
other environmental concerns; and,
Whereas, Dean Holden completed his term of service on the City of Dover
Planning Commission on January 3, 2019.
Now Therefore Be It Resolved That, the City of Dover Planning Commission does
hereby express its sincere appreciation to Dean Holden for his faithful and
exemplary service to the Citizens of the City of Dover as an active member of the
City of Dover Planning Commission and extends its very best wishes to Dean
Holden for a bright and prosperous future.
__________________________ _________________________
Fred Tolbert David S. Hugg, III
Planning Commission Chairman City Planner
Page 32
Appointment of the Architectural Review Oversight Subcommittee of
Planning Commission
As part of the Annual Meeting of the Planning Commission, one of the responsibilities of the
Planning Commission is to appoint the Architectural Review Oversight Subcommittee. The
following excerpt from the Zoning Ordinance is provided.
Appendix B: Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 Section 2. Site development plan approval.
2.28 Consideration shall be given to the physical orientation and architectural characteristics of
proposed buildings, the relationship of proposed buildings to existing buildings and to other proposed
buildings, and their contributions to the overall image of the immediate vicinity by considering the
building and architectural design guidelines as set forth in article 5, section 19. Design characteristics
of proposed buildings and building additions shall not detract or devalue existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity.
(A) If the planning commission determines that the proposed physical orientation and
architectural characteristics of the proposed buildings do not meet the intent and objectives of
this section, then the planning commission shall refer the proposal to the architectural review
oversight subcommittee for review and comment.
(B) The subcommittee shall meet and review the proposal with the applicant, and return its
comments to the planning commission by the next regularly scheduled meeting.
(C) The architectural review oversight subcommittee shall be appointed by the commission at its
annual meeting, and membership shall consist of two planning commission members, and
two design professionals with experience in construction, and the mayor or the mayor's
designee. Two alternate design professionals with experience in construction shall also be
appointed.
At the Annual Meeting of the Planning Commission on August 20, 2018 the following
individuals were appointed to the Architectural Review Oversight Subcommittee of Planning
Commission.
o Kathleen Welsh, Planning Commission member
o Dean Holden, Planning Commission member
o Mayor or Mayor’s designee
On September 17, 2018 the Planning Commission acted to appoint two Design Professional
members to the Subcommittee. No other Design Professionals as Alternates have been
appointed.
o Ms. Sarah Keifer, Director of Planning Services for Kent County, Design Professional
o Dr. R.J. Chandler, Faculty member of Architecture program at DelTech Community
College, Design Professional
The Planning Commission needs to act to designate another Planning Commission member
to this Subcommittee to replace former Commission & Subcommittee member Dean Holden.
Selection to Architectural Review Oversight Subcommittee of the Planning Commission 1-2019