COUNCIL PACKET

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA June 28, 2010 - 7:30 P.M. - Council Chambers - City Hall - City of Dover OPEN FORUM - 15 MINUTES PRIOR TO OFFICIAL MEETING (7:15 P.M.) INVOCATION BY CHAPLAIN WALLACE DIXON PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS * CONSENT AGENDA Those items on the Council Agenda which are considered routine and non-controversial shall be marked with an asterisk (*) and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. * 1. Adoption of Minutes - Regular Council Meeting of June 14, 2010 2. Public Hearing - Board of Assessment Appeals Exemption Reports - May 5, May 26, and June 9, 2010 A. May 5, 2010 * a-1. A&I Housing Inc. - 80 N. Halsey Rd. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) * a-2. A&I Housing Inc. - 235 N. New St. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) * a-3. A&I Housing Inc. - 728 Maple Pky. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) * a-4. DIMA IX Inc. - 456 E. Loockerman St. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) * a-5. DIMA IX Inc. - 223 Mifflin Rd. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) * a-6. DIMA IX Inc. - 15 Pin Oak Dr. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) * a-7. Pennsylvania Lines - Land/Tracks S. West St. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption)

Council Agenda June 28, 2010 Page 2 * a-8. Pennsylvania Lines - Land/Tracks New Burton Rd. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) * a-9. Village of Westover Homeowners Assoc. - Open Space Village of Westover (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) a-10. Westover LLC - Open Space Village of Westover (Assessor Recommended Denial of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Denial of Request for Exemption) a-11. Robino-Sea Chase LLC - Open Space Village of Westover (Assessor Recommended Denial of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Denial of Request for Exemption) B. May 26, 2010 * b-1. Persimmon Park Place Condominium Council Inc. - Open Space Persimmon Park (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Requested Item be Tabled Pending Legal Opinion) * b-2. First Pilgrim Baptist Church - 350 Frear Dr. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Requested Item be Tabled Pending Legal Opinion) * b-3. YMCA - 1145 S. State St. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) * b-4. YMCA - 1169 S. State St. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) b-5. Correctional Officers Assoc. - 1243 College Park Dr. (Assessor Recommended Denial of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Denial of Request for Exemption) C. June 9, 2010 c-1. First Pilgrim Baptist Church - 350 Frear Dr. (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Denial of Request for Exemption) * c-2. Persimmon Park Place Condominium Council Inc. - Open Space Persimmon Park (Assessor Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) (Board Recommended Approval of Request for Exemption) * 3. Utility Committee Report - June 14, 2010 A. National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit (Committee Recommended Acceptance of the Report)

Council Agenda June 28, 2010 Page 3 4. Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report - June 14, 2010 * A. Review and Recommendation - Filling Critical Positions a-1. Permanent Full Time and Temporary Full Time Administrative Assistant - City Clerk’s Office (Committee Recommended that Staff be Granted Permission to Recruit for the Permanent, Full-Time Administrative Assistant Position in the City Clerk's Office and Temporarily Hire the Previous Records Management Coordinator, Ms. Denise Devine, until a Permanent Employee Can Be Hired) a-2. Temporary Full Time Payroll Specialist - Finance Department (Committee Recommended that Staff be Granted Permission to Recruit for the Temporary, Full-Time Payroll Specialist Position in the Finance Department) B. Medicare Part B Reimbursement Exception (Committee Recommended Approval of this Non-Precedent Setting Request for a Medicare Part B Reimbursement Exception) * C. Concerns Regarding Bidding by Minority Businesses (Committee Recommended that Staff be Directed to Study the Bidding Process as it Relates to Minorities and Women and Bring a Program Back to the Committee that Would Address the Issues Discussed by Members) * D. Proposed Ordinance #2010-18 - Appendix B - Zoning, Article 9 - Board of Adjustment (See Item #12-A) (Committee Recommended that Proposed Ordinance #2010-18 be Forwarded to City Council for a First Reading on June 28, 2010; Referred to the Planning Commission for Consideration on July 19, 2010; and that a Final Reading and Public Hearing Be Set Before City Council on August 9, 2010) * E. Refunding of 2004 Electric Revenue Bonds (Committee Recommended Approval to Refund the 2004 Taxable Electric Revenue Bonds with Series 2010 Tax Exempt Electric Revenue Bonds) * F. Reaffirmation of Authority to Purchase Utility Commodities and Execute Contracts (Committee Recommended Reaffirmation that the City: 1) May Enter into Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreements, International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreements, North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) Master Agreements, or Other Similar Enabling Agreements, along with Any Related Schedules, Credit Support Documents and Confirmations, or Other Documents Pertaining to Any Energy Commodity or Investment Transactions; 2) May Enter into Energy Commodity or Investment Transactions for a Duration Not to Exceed Six (6) Years from the Date of Transaction Execution; 3) Has Authorized Pace Global Asset Management, LLC ("Pace Global") to Act as its Agent for All Energy Commodity and Related Investment Transactions; and 4) Has Granted the City Manager and Mayor the Authority to Execute Energy Commodity and Investment Transactions on Behalf of the City)

Council Agenda June 28, 2010 Page 4 5. Special Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Report - June 28, 2010 (Considered During the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Meeting Earlier in the Evening) A. Approval of 2010 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Five (5) Year Consolidated Plan and Proposed Resolution #2010-04 (Council Referred Back to Committee During Their Meeting of June 14, 2010) * 6. Annual Report - Dover Fire Department * 7. Monthly CIP Report - April 2010 8. Expenditure Authorization A. 2010 Office of Justice Programs (OJP) Justice Assistance Grant B. CIP Project PD1001 - Core Law Enforcement Server Replacements 9. Evaluation of Bids A. FY 2011 Street Program B. Miscellaneous Concrete Repair Program * 10. Election to Fill Vacancy - Robbins Hose Company - Terms to Expire December 31, 2010 (All Positions Unopposed) Deputy Fire Chief - David Carey First Assistant Fire Chief - Timothy Mullaney, Jr. Fourth Assistant Fire Chief - Carl Troubetaris Second Fire Line Captain - Donald Stock * 11. Appointments - Recommended by Mayor Carey A. Dover MPO Public Advisory Committee - Two (2) Year Term to Expire July 2012 - Dr. Carlton L. Cannon, Jr. (Reappointment) B. Board of Adjustment - Three (3) Year Terms to Expire July 2013 (Reappointments) b-1. K. C. Sheth, Chairperson (Reappointment) b-2. William Hufnal (Reappointment) 12. First Reading - Proposed Ordinances The First Reading is offered on the following proposed ordinances. Since they are amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map, they are recommended for referral to the Planning Commission on July 19, 2010, and that Public Hearings be set for August 9, 2010 at 7:30 p.m. and that the Second Readings and Final Action by Council take place at that time. Copies of all proposed ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office. A. Proposed Ordinance #2010-18 - Appendix B - Zoning, Article 9 - Board of Adjustment (Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee) B. Proposed Ordinance No. 2010-21 - Recreational and Open Space (ROS) Zone Map Amendments

Council Agenda June 28, 2010 Page 5 13. Final Reading - Proposed Ordinances The First Reading of the following proposed ordinances was accomplished during the Council Meeting of June 14, 2010. Copies of the proposed ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers. A. Ordinance #2010-20 - Notification of Tax Rate Increase Over the Rolled Back Tax Rate [Required in accordance with 22 Delaware Code Section 1105(b)] B. Ordinance #2010-19 - Budget Ordinances - 2010/2011 City of Dover Budget b-1. General Fund - Cash Receipts and Budget b-2. Governmental Capital Projects Fund - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-3. General Fund Contingency - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-4. General Capital Asset Replacement Fund - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-5. Municipal Street Aid Fund - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-6. Water/Wastewater Fund - Revenue and Budget b-7. Water/Wastewater Improvement and Extension Fund - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-8. Water/Wastewater Capital Asset Reserve - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-9. Water/Wastewater Contingency Reserve - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-10. Electric Revenue Fund - Revenue and Budget b-11. Electric Utility Improvement and Extension Fund - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-12. Electric Utility Contingency Reserve - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-13. Electric Utility Depreciation Reserve - Sources and Uses of Funds b-14. Electric Utility Future Capacity Reserve - Sources and Uses of Funds b-15. Electric Utility Insurance Stabilization Reserve - Sources and Uses of Funds b-16. Electric Utility Rate Stabilization Reserve - Sources and Uses of Funds b-17. Workers Compensation Fund - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-18. Community Transportation Improvement Fund - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-19. OPEB (Other Post-Employment Benefits) Reserve Fund - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-20. Parkland/Recreation Reserve - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-21. Library Reserve - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget b-22. Library Grant Fund - Cash Receipts/Revenue and Budget C. Downtown Dover Business Improvement District-Cash Receipts/Budget FY 2010-2011 D. Proposed Ordinance #2010-13 - Furloughs and Pension Plan Closing 14. Council Members Announcements /tm S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Council-Agendas\2010\06-28-2010.wpd THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING The Regular Council Meeting was held on June 14, 2010 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Hogan presiding. Council members present were Mr. Bonar, Mrs. Russell, Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. Leary, Mr. McGiffin, Mrs. Williams, Mr. Salters, and Mr. Ruane. Council staff members present were Police Chief Hosfelt, Ms. Russell, Mrs. Mitchell, Mrs. Townshend, Fire Chief Christiansen, Mr. DePrima, City Solicitor Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Mayor Carey was also present. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Hogan declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council is not in official session and cannot take formal action. There was no one present wishing to speak during the Open Forum. The invocation was given by Councilman Salters, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Leary moved for approval of the agenda as presented, seconded by Mrs. Williams and unanimously carried. Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the consent agenda, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 24, 2010 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of May 24, 2010 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Bonar, seconded by Mr. Leary and bore the written approval of Mayor Carey. PRESENTATION - GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (GFOA) DISTINGUISHED BUDGET AWARD The Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2009, from the Government Finance Officers Association, was awarded to the City of Dover. This award signifies the excellent manner in which the City prepares and presents its budget. Mayor Carey presented the award to Mrs. Teresa Tieman, Senior City Administrator, and noted that this is the 20th time the City has received this award. Mayor Carey commended the budget team for their efforts. Mrs. Tieman relayed appreciation to all the participants in the budget process, including the citizens, members of Council, department heads and their administrative assistants, and the employees of the City of Dover, as well as the budget team (Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, and Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer), who played a major role in the preparation of the document. She also thanked Ms. Hollie Ford, Administrative Assistant, for her diligent work and effort in the preparation of the budget.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 2 PUBLIC HEARING - ELECTRIC FUND BUDGET A public hearing on the Electric Revenue Fund Budget is required for compliance with Section 505 of the 1993 Electric Revenue Refunding Bond Issue (Refunding 1985 Electric Revenue Bond) prior to adoption of the budget. Notice of the public hearing was properly advertised for this time and place. Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, announced that the proposed Electric Fund budget for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 proposes $110,118,113 in revenues and expenses, which includes a $2M power cost adjustment to be credited back to customers. The adjustment would be reflected in the billings for July as a .0028 credit per kWh, which would create a $33.00 per year reduction in electric rates for an average home in the City. He noted that the budget also includes $8,744,651 in the fund balance to meet policy requirements in this regard and an $8,856,000 transfer to the Electric Fund. Council President Hogan declared the public hearing open. There being no one present wishing to speak during the public hearing, Council President Hogan declared the public hearing closed. No further action was taken. Council President Hogan noted that the First Reading of the Budget Ordinances will take place during the latter part of the meeting and that the Final Reading and adoption of the Ordinances are scheduled for the Regular Council Meeting of June 28, 2010. PUBLIC HEARING/FINAL READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-12 - ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider approval of proposed land and zoning text amendments that propose to create a Recreation and Open Space (ROS) Zone that would be applied to City parks, protected open space, recreation areas within residential developments, and other areas identified as “Open Space” within the Land Development Plan. Mr. Salters moved that the Final Reading of the proposed zoning text amendment be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. McGiffin and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the Ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of April 26, 2010.) Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that staff developed the Proposed Ordinance as an implementation measure associated with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed zone would be applied to areas shown as Open Space on the Land Development Plan of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Mrs. Townshend explained that the proposed amendment would adopt the permitted uses, conditional uses, bulk standards, and design requirements for the proposed zone. In developing the Proposed Ordinance, she stated that staff reviewed the Land Development Plan to ensure that the uses permitted and bulk standards set forth are consistent with the areas where the zone will ultimately be applied. Members were advised that the rezoning of properties will require separate action by the Planning Commission and City Council. Mrs. Townshend noted that the text amendment creating the Recreation and Open Space (ROS) Zone is the first in a two (2) phase process. Staff is currently working on determining which properties in the City will be proposed for rezoning to this

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 3 classification and notifying affected property owners. She indicated that staff expects to bring the parcels proposed for rezoning forward for a First Reading at the June 28, 2010 City Council meeting. Mrs. Townshend advised members that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendments. Council President Hogan declared the hearing open. There being no one present wishing to speak during the public hearing, Council President Hogan declared the hearing closed. Mr. McGlumphy moved for adoption of Ordinance #2010-12 (Exhibit #1), seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING (BUDGET HEARINGS) MINUTES OF MAY 18, 19, 20, AND 25, 2010 The Minutes of the Special Council Meeting (Budget Hearings) of May 18, 19, 20, and 25, 2010 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Bonar, seconded by Mr. Leary and bore the written approval of Mayor Carey. Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, provided a briefing on the Budget Hearings, as follows: Setting of Property Tax Rate for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Mr. DePrima reminded members that the property tax rate for FY 2010/2011 was set at 0.33¢ per $100 of assessed value and that the previous assessed value of property in the City was based on the reassessment concluded in 2005. Based on these figures, he explained that the total tax base for the City of Dover was projected as $2,913,538,826. Upon completion of the reevaluation in 2010, Mr. DePrima indicated that the new assessed value for the City of Dover totals $3,093,511,459, an increase of approximately 6%. In accordance with Delaware State Law, he advised that the City must publish a “roll back tax rate” to account for the 6% increase, which would equate to .3108¢ per $100 of assessed value. Mr. DePrima noted that if Council decides to levy taxes above this rate, the City must state this change as a tax increase. He noted that the current proposed budget includes a proposed rate increase in the amount of .3378¢ per $100 of assessed value, which equates to an 8.68% tax rate increase. Budget Ordinances - Proposed 2010/2011 Noting that there are 22 budgets, Mr. DePrima provided a briefing on the three (3) main budgets proposed, as follows: General Fund, Cash Receipts and Budget - $37,709,966 Mr. DePrima noted that the General Fund meets the fund balance requirements of 8% and includes an 8.68% increase in taxes, an increase of $5.85 for the average homeowner for monthly trash fee, and a 3% increase in business license fee for most businesses.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 4 Water/Wastewater Fund - Revenue and Budget - $12,778,737 Mr. DePrima explained that the Water/Wastewater Fund includes a water increase of approximately .11¢, a wastewater rate increase of 26%, and a new groundwater infiltration charge of $1.05 per 1,000 gallons. While these rate increases are substantial, he indicated that City of Dover rates overall are well below the average rates for water and wastewater providers in the State of Delaware. Electric Revenue Fund - Revenue and Budget - $110,115,281 Mr. DePrima stated that the Electric Revenue Fund includes a Power Cost Adjustment credit in the amount of .0028¢ per kWh, which will fund approximately $2M back to rate payers and provide the average homeowner approximately $33 per year in credits. Budget Ordinances - Downtown Dover Business Improvement District - Cash Receipts/Budget FY 2010-2011 Mr. DePrima reminded members that the proposed Downtown Dover Business Improvement District, Cash Receipts and Budget, totals $52,144, which includes the setting of a tax rate for the district. Like the property tax, he advised members that a roll back tax rate is required by Delaware State Law. He noted that there are no proposed tax increases; therefore, adoption of the roll back tax rate is requested. The roll back rate for Zone 1 is .0634¢ per $100; Zone 2 is .0349¢ per $100; and Zone 3 is .0156¢ per $100. Mr. McGlumphy noted that the proposed budget includes various salary increases for FY 2010 and a restoration of 2009 salary increases, as well as an additional 3% increase for non-bargaining and Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) employees. He also noted that the City is currently in negotiations with two (2) unions, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) and the International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried Machine and Furniture Workers and Communication Workers of America (IUE-CWA). It was his understanding that the restoration of the 2009 salaries provides a 3.5% increase for employees of the IUE-CWA, non-bargaining, and FOP, and a 4% increase for employees of the IBEW. Mr. McGlumphy indicated his opposition to the proposed budget, stating that he felt it was not a sustainable budget, it compounds legacy cost, and the citizens of Dover are not in favor of it. Responding to Council President Hogan, Mr. McGlumphy explained that when he mentioned the “restoration” of 2009 salaries, he was referring to the cancellation of employee furloughs, which negated salary increases in FY 2009. Mr. McGlumphy confirmed that salaries for City Council would also be restored under the proposed budget. Mr. McGiffin moved to accept the Council Budget Hearings Report, seconded by Mr. Salters and carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes and three (3) no (Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. Leary, and Mrs. Williams).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 5 UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT - MAY 24, 2010 The Utility Committee met on May 24, 2010 with Chairman Ruane presiding. Request for Alley and Street Abandonments - 100 Block of North Governors Avenue Alley West, the Southern Portion of the 200 Block of North Governors Avenue Alley East, a Portion of the Unit Block of North Bradford Street, the Unit Block of Fulton Street, a Portion of the Unit Block of Cecil Street, a Portion of the 200 Block of North Bradford Street, and the Northern Portion of the Unit Block of North State Street Alley West - Wesley College Members considered a request from Wesley College that the City abandon portions of streets and alleys in the vicinity of Wesley College, as follows: Area #1 - Alley between North Governors Avenue and North New Street from Cecil Street to Fulton Street; Area #2- Portion of alley between North Bradford Street and North Governors Avenue, north of Cecil Street; Area #3- North Bradford Street between W. Division and Fulton Streets (portions only); Area #4- Fulton Street between North Governors Avenue and North State Street; Area #5- Cecil Street between North Governors Avenue and North State (portion only); Area #6- North Bradford Street between Cecil and Mary Streets (portions only); Area #7- Portion of alley between North State Street and North Bradford Street, south of Fulton Street and north of W. Division Street. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that the request is being made in anticipation of implementation of the Wesley College Master Plan for creating a more pedestrian-oriented campus. She stated that the subject property consists of public streets owned and maintained by the City of Dover. The portions of rights-of-way requested for abandonment are adjacent on both sides to other properties owned by Wesley College. Fulton and Cecil Streets (Areas #4 and #5) connect North State Street with North Governors Avenue and are conduits for through traffic between the two (2) roads. The two (2) segments of North Bradford Street (Areas #3 and #6) that are requested for abandonment end at the college. Mrs. Townshend noted that several alley segments are also proposed to be vacated. Members were provided a diagram depicting the location of each of the areas. Mrs. Townshend indicated that the Planning staff supports Wesley College’s vision of a pedestrian-oriented campus and, should the long-term abandonment of the subject streets help accomplish this objective, staff supports the conceptual request. However, she stated that staff recommends that such approval be conditioned on abandonment coinciding with future site plan approval. Because these are public streets that are part of the downtown grid system, Mrs. Townshend stated that staff believes that Wesley and the City should consider the testimony presented by the public on this matter, as well as a phased abandonment. Mrs. Townshend noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the street and alley abandonment, as requested by Wesley College. She advised members that the Planning Commission’s motion did not reference the conditions recommended by Planning staff and requested that these conditions be addressed by the Utility Committee. Referring to the first condition, Mrs. Townshend indicated that the City Manager has recommended that the abandonment be linked

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 6 to the completion of the implementation of the Wesley College site plan. She stated that the intent is to ensure that the City maintains ownership of the subject streets and alleys until they are altered in accordance with the site plan. Mrs. Townshend explained that the recommended conditions are as follows: 1) Abandonment should be timed so that the City maintains ownership and maintenance of the subject streets and alleys until site improvements involving those areas are made, in accordance with a site plan approved by the Planning Commission. 2) All public electric, water, wastewater, and storm sewer infrastructure must be located within permanent utility easements, in accordance with the recommendations set forth in the Public Utilities comments from the Development Advisory Commission (DAC) report dated April 1, 2010 (provided to members). Mrs. Townshend indicated that she had discussed this request with Fire Chief Sean Christiansen, who indicated that comments from Fire Department staff will occur when the streets are actually altered or blocked off. She stated that, if staff’s recommendation to link the abandonments with the site plan is incorporated in the Utility Committee’s recommendation to Council, this would satisfy the Fire Department’s concerns since they would perform a review at that time. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Townshend assured members that the omission of the DAC comments in the recommendation from the Planning Commission was an oversight. She noted that the Commission’s recommendations normally include DAC comments and that it was realized after the minutes were completed that this was not accomplished. She stated that the applicant was made aware of the conditions. Mr. Gregg Moore, Becker Morgan Group (representing Wesley College), noted that during the public hearing before the Planning Commission, the applicant indicated concurrence with the provision that no improvements, changes, or modifications would be made to any of the roadways until the plan to create the walking campus is accepted by the Planning Commission. Mr. Moore briefed members on the request and the plan to create a walking campus for Wesley College (details, including maps, were provided to members). Referring to the map, he indicated that the plan would include improvements, walkways, easements, etc. He noted that the plan, when presented to the Planning Commission, will depict how a cul-de-sac would be created on the property to allow emergency services into the portion of Cecil Street that will remain unchanged. Responding to Mr. McGiffin, Mrs. Townshend stated that adjacent property owners include Wesley College and one (1) additional property owner, and that these owners were notified, as required. Mr. Moore noted that Dr. William Johnston, President of Wesley College, contacted neighbors adjacent to the areas who would potentially be affected and that the College also held neighborhood meetings and provided updates on the long-term plan and the requests for alley and street abandonments.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 7 In response to Mr. Bonar regarding adequate parking, Mr. Moore indicated that Wesley College is considering the prohibition of freshman/underclassman vehicle usage, as well as the addition of a parking garage and/or flat parking lots. He assured members that Wesley College understands that if parking is eliminated, parking must be provided elsewhere. Mrs. Townshend noted that staff’s report includes a comment regarding the elimination of parking and that the site plan would require a specific plan to accommodate displaced parking to avoid dispersion of parking into nearby neighborhood streets. Mr. Clarence Savin, 226 N. Governors Avenue, relayed concerns regarding the current parking conditions at Wesley College and the surrounding areas and felt that prohibiting freshman from having vehicles on campus would make parking conditions worse for the neighboring streets. Although he had no objections to the long-term plan proposed by Wesley College, he felt that parking should be addressed prior to any approvals. Mr. Savin indicated that there are already parking concerns on his block, explaining that there are two (2) houses on the block permitted to house Wesley students and that there are currently four (4) houses. He questioned how Wesley College plans to access the parking lot at the old tennis courts and allow for delivery trucks (for the kitchen) if Fulton Street and parts of Cecil Streets will be closed. With reference to the neighborhood meetings held by Wesley College, Mr. Savin indicated that no one on the 200 block of N. Governors Avenue was notified of such meetings. Prior to taking any further action, he felt that the City should require Wesley College to provide adequate parking. Mr. Michael Maciarello, 11 Cecil Street, advised members that, in addition to a neighborhood presentation, Dr. Johnston provided a presentation of the plans for Wesley College to him personally. Mr. Maciarello indicated his opposition to the proposal, explaining his feeling that the pedestrian- oriented campus plan does not fulfill the primary point for the project, which is improved safety. He stated that the majority of traffic on Cecil and Fulton Streets consists of Wesley College students cruising for parking spaces, since proximity to their classes is an issue. Mr. Maciarello noted that the neighborhood association has been working on obtaining cross-walks for school children coming from the west side of Governors Avenue going to Central Middle School, and this took three (3) years to accomplish. It was his feeling that the Wesley College request appears to be “fast tracked”. Mr. Maciarello indicated that the first steps in achieving the goal would be to eliminate parking from Cecil Street to Fulton Street since this would “push” traffic out and would be a less expensive option. He felt that his residence would be the most affected, since the closing of the street would occur right before his home, noting that emergency response would be delayed. He suggested that Wesley College consider development of their properties located on the east side of Governors Avenue and incorporate a parking garage with a pedestrian overpass. This would link the two (2) properties in a manner that would be more conducive to pedestrian traffic and safety. In response to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Townshend explained that the process for street and alley abandonment requires that the matter be presented to Council to set a public hearing (for June 28, 2010), if recommended favorably by the Committee. She indicated staff’s reluctance to expand the notification beyond the required adjacent property owners, explaining concern that this could create problems; however, should the Committee make such recommendation, she suggested that property owners within 200’ be contacted.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 8 Responding to Mr. Hogan, Mr. Moore stated that there has not been any final determination regarding the location of a parking garage and that the College has considered utilizing property they currently own, as well as purchasing property for this purpose; however, he indicated that no final decision has been made in this regard. In order to assure adequate parking, Mr. Moore stated that there would be a need to replace every parking space lost as a result of the abandonments and, depending upon what building or structures are added, there would be additional parking necessary to assist with the current parking situation. Mr. McGiffin relayed concern with recommending approval of the request at this time due to the lack of public notification. Mr. Snaman noted that the role of the Utility Committee is to assure that utilities are not affected by such an abandonment and suggested that any concerns regarding parking would be addressed by the Planning Commission. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Townshend explained that the parking concerns have been included by the Planning Staff as advisory comments and that all comments, including the requirement to compensate for displaced parking, must be included in the site plan. The Committee recommended that the request be postponed to allow Planning Staff to notify all property owners within 200’ and that the item be reconsidered by the Utility Committee during their meeting of June 28, 2010. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Review of Utility Related CIP’s (Electric and Water/Wastewater) Members were provided a Project Tracking Report, as of March 31, 2010, for the Utility (Electric and Water/Wastewater) Related Capital Investment Plan (CIP). Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, noted that, since the State financing has been finalized, the City has begun construction of several projects, particularly in Wastewater. The Committee recommended acceptance of the Utility Related CIP’s Report. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Update - Green Energy Funding and Programming Members were provided an update, as of May 13, 2010, on Green Energy Funding and Programming, which included details regarding those grants that were paid, pending applications, energy depot fees, and energy efficiency campaigns/education programs. Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, suggested that 2010 applications may surpass those from 2009. The Committee recommended acceptance of the Green Energy Funding and Programming Update provided by staff.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 9 By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. PACE/NAES Monthly Report (February and March) (Deferred by Committee on April 26, 2010) Members were provided the PACE/NAES Monthly Reports for February and March. The reports were provided to allow members the opportunity to monitor what is being sold in electric and the revenues received, which will give members a better understanding of any fluctuations and make improvements if deemed necessary. Although it was not staff’s intention to make a presentation of the reports, they welcomed any questions. The Committee recommended acceptance of the PACE/NAES Monthly Reports for February and March 2010. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for acceptance of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT - MAY 24, 2010 The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met on May 24, 2010 with Chairman McGlumphy presiding. Medicare Part B Reimbursement Exception Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, reminded members that effective May 1, 2010, the Electric/Water Meter Reading Division was downsized by two (2) Field Service Representatives (FSR’s). One of the FSR’s elected to retire rather than accept a transfer offer. This employee had approximately 33 years of service. Mr. DePrima explained that the International Union of the Electronic, Electric, Salaried Machine and Furniture Workers - Communication Workers of America (IUE-CWA), which represents the FSR positions, has requested that the City make an exception to the Letter of Understanding dated October 12, 2007. This letter indicates that IUE-CWA members who retire on or after January 31, 2010 will not be entitled to have their Medicare Part B premium payments paid by the City. Mr. DePrima stated that it is believed that, had the IUE-CWA employee known that his position would be eliminated effective May 1, 2010, he would have elected to retire prior to January 31, 2010 and thus would have been entitled to the reimbursement. Staff recommended approval of this non-precedent setting request. Responding to Mr. Leary, Mr. DePrima advised members that the FSR positions were the only reductions in force that occurred within a short period of time of the agreement; therefore, there are no other employees affected by the reductions in force to whom this exception would apply.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 10 Mr. McGlumphy questioned if a legal opinion was obtained, as he had requested. He relayed concern that the matter would set a precedent. Responding, Mr. DePrima stated that a legal opinion could be provided prior to this matter being presented to Council for final action. In response to Dr. Jones, Mr. DePrima indicated that the employee’s salary would have been preserved had he accepted the transfer; however, the position offered was not a comparable position. He explained that, although he felt confident that the employee could have learned the job, the position offered had another skill set that would have required additional training. At the request of Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. Kenneth Clendaniel, President IUE-CWA Local 88315, advised members that the employee had served as a meter reader for 33 years and that the salary for the position offered to the employee, if transferred, would have been “frozen” for eight (8) years. Responding to Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. Clendaniel stated that he did not foresee a similar situation arising in the future. He assured members that if the employee had anticipated his position being eliminated, he would have retired prior to January 31st; however, he was not advised of the circumstance until after that date. Mr. Salters felt that the employee’s longevity and loyalty to the City should be given consideration and recommended that the request be approved. Mr. McGlumphy reiterated his concerns with the legality of the issue and felt that there should be legal documentation to support any action taken in this regard. Responding, Mr. DePrima relayed no objections to tabling the matter until a legal opinion is obtained. The Committee recommended that the matter be tabled pending receipt of a legal opinion. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Discussion - Fiscal Year 2010 Audit Program Staff provided members with a Fiscal Year 2010 Audit Calendar for their review. Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, noted that the agenda reflected Fiscal Year 2011; however, the calendar was for Fiscal Year 2010. She also noted that the draft audit report is scheduled to be presented to the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee on October 25, 2010. The Committee recommended acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2010 Audit Calendar. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 11 Downtown Dover Business Improvement District (BID) Assessment (Tax) Rate for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, explained that, in accordance with Appendix D, Article III, Section 9(f) of the Dover Code, City Council must adopt a Business Improvement District (BID) budget and assessment every year. Members were provided the FY 2010-2011 Budget showing BID tax revenue and the expenses charged against that revenue, as well as a tax calculation worksheet with recommended rates. Mrs. Mitchell noted that the revenue percentages by zone have been calculated in accordance with Section 9(e) of Appendix D, Article III of the Dover Code and that the amounts were estimated per the reassessed values. Staff recommended approval of the Downtown Dover Business Improvement District (BID) Budget Ordinance for Fiscal Year 2010-11 (attachment to Committee minutes), and the Assessment (Tax) Rate for 2010-11 (attachment to Committee minutes). (City Clerk’s Office Note: During the Budget Hearing of May 25, 2010, Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that staff’s intention was to maintain the same rate by applying the previous assessed values with the previous assessed rates to determine the tax. Since the BID tax had already been presented to the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee, who formulated a recommendation for Council, Mr. DePrima stated that the Ordinance would be amended to reflect the rolled-back rate, for presentation to Council on June 14, 2010.) The Committee recommended approval of staff’s recommendation. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. (The First Reading of the Ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting.) Proposed Ordinance #2010-13 - Furloughs and Pension Plan Closing During their meeting of April 12, 2010, members considered Proposed Ordinance #2010-13, amending Division 7 - General Employees Pension Plan of the Dover Code. At that time, it was noted that no further action would be required since staff would be making additional amendments based on the Committee’s discussion and that this matter would be brought back to the Committee for further review and recommendation to City Council. Mrs. Kimberly Hawkins, Human Resources Director, advised members that the Ordinance had been updated with comments and suggestions from the April 12, 2010 Committee meeting and that the updates were noted in blue font. The Committee recommended adoption of Ordinance #2010-13 as presented. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. (The First Reading of the Proposed Ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting.)

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 12 Concerns Regarding Bidding by Minority Businesses Due to time constraints, this item was deferred until the next meeting. Mr. McGlumphy advised members that for the next year, he would no longer be serving as Chair and relayed appreciation to the staff and Committee members for their service to the Committee during his tenure. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for acceptance of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. MONTHLY REPORTS - APRIL 2010 By motion of Mr. Bonar, seconded by Mr. Leary, the following monthly reports were accepted by consent agenda: Budget Report Chief of Police Report City Assessor Report City Manager's Report City Planner’s Report Dover Fire Department Report (March) APPROVAL OF 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FIVE (5) YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND PROPOSED RESOLUTION #2010-04 Members were provided the 2010 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Five (5) Year Consolidated Plan and Proposed Resolution #2010-04. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that the Consolidated Plan (2010-2014) is a five (5) year plan mandated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This plan identifies the specific needs concerning affordable housing, homeownership, housing rehabilitation, and community development. She noted that the Consolidated Plan is due for 2010, which is a census year, and that the census data used to develop the plan (from 2000) is dated. She indicated that when the 2010 census data is available, it is staff’s desire to update and amend the Consolidated Plan. Mrs. Russell moved to refer the 2010 CDBG Five (5) Year Consolidated Plan and Proposed Resolution #2010-04 back to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee to be considered during a Special Meeting on June 28, 2010, and to be immediately considered by Council later that same evening. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ruane. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mrs. Russell stated that although members of the Committee were invited to attend the public hearings, some members were unable to attend and the Committee did not have the opportunity to discuss the proposed Plan or Resolution.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 13 The motion to refer the 2010 CDBG Five (5) Year Consolidated Plan and Proposed Resolution #2010-04 back to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee to be considered during a Special Meeting on June 28, 2010 and to be immediately considered by Council later that same evening was unanimously carried. EVALUATION OF BIDS - EAST NORTH STATE STREET PHASE A PIPE MATERIALS Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that as a part of the proposed Water Quality Improvements to the City of Dover’s water system, the Public Utilities Department is upgrading the existing water main in Hazel Road, Maryland Avenue and a portion of American Avenue. Staff solicited bids for the East North State Street Phase A pipe materials for the supply of major water line materials to complete this portion of the project. He noted that subsequent bids will include fill material (stone, select backfill, etc.) and paving materials/contractor. This activity is being performed as identified in the Utilities Water Quality Evaluation performed on the water system and will be installed by the Utilities Construction Crew. Staff recommended awarding the bid to the lowest bidder, Belair Road Supply, for the amount of $96,669.50. Mr. McGiffin moved for approval of staff’s recommendation to award the bid to the lowest bidder, Belair Road Supply, for the amount of $96,669.50, seconded by Mr. Ruane and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS - CURBSIDE RECYCLING SERVICES Members were advised that the contract for Curbside Recycling Services with the Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) will expire on June 30, 2010, with the last pick-up day being June 29, 2010. Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that staff solicited proposals from qualified vendors earlier in the year to provide this service and that there were four (4) vendors who submitted proposals. Since receipt of the proposals, State legislation has been passed to require the DSWA to exit the collection business, so their proposal was technically withdrawn. Staff has reviewed the remaining proposals and confirmed all of the costs associated with a proposed agreement. In addition, staff has analyzed the cost to provide this service using City labor and equipment. Based on the analysis of this information, staff recommended execution of a contract with Inland Service Corporation at the following rates: July 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011 – Year 1 - $1.18 per pick up (every other week service) July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2012 – Year 2 - $1.19 per pick up (every other week service) July 1, 2012 – June 30, 2013 – Year 3 - $1.21 per pick up (every other week service) Mr. DePrima indicated the estimated annual contract value as follows: Year 1 - $ 235,622.40 – based on 7,680 customers on July 1, 2010 Year 2 - $ 239,166.20 – based on 7,730 customers on July 1, 2011 Year 3 - $ 244,758.80 – based on 7,780 customers on July 1, 2012

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 14 Noting that the contract would encumber funds that are included as a part of the proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2010 as well as Fiscal Years 2011 and 2012, Mrs. Williams relayed concerns with the approval of the recommendation since the necessary funds have not been authorized by Council. Responding to Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. DePrima stated that the only cost for the City would be for the purchase of trash barrels. The proposal is that costs for recycling will be covered by a trash fee paid by all residents. He explained that this is no different than other special trash services provided to residents that some take advantage of and others do not, such as bulk pickup. In response to Mr. Ruane, Mr. DePrima confirmed that there is State legislation program that mandates the City to provide recycling and there is a “bottle” bill associated that provides for the collection of deposit fees that the City can apply for at a later date; however, no funds were included in the proposed budget since staff was unsure of how the rebate program would work. Mrs. Williams questioned how other municipalities (Newark and Harrington) eliminated the service through budgetary cutbacks if recycling has been mandated by Delaware State Law. Responding, Mr. DePrima indicated that he was not aware of any municipalities eliminating recycling from their budgets. To his knowledge, he stated that the City of Newark provides trash service and would, therefore, be required to provide recycling services. However, he stated that the City of Harrington does not provide trash service; therefore, their trash provider would be required to provide recycling services. Mr. DePrima stated that this requirement is also true in unincorporated areas for companies that serve county residents. Mr. Salters requested that staff provide members with the details regarding the four (4) proposals submitted. Mr. McGiffin moved for approval of staff’s recommendation to authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with Inland Service Corporation to provide curbside recycling at the following rates: July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011 (Year 1) - $1.18 per pick up (every other week service); July 1, 2011 - June 30, 2012 (Year 2) - $1.19 per pick up (every other week service); July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013 (Year 3) - $1.21 per pick up (every other week service). The motion was seconded by Mr. Ruane and carried by a roll call vote of seven (7) yes and two (2) no (Mr. McGlumphy and Mrs. Williams). REAPPOINTMENTS - RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR CAREY Mayor Carey requested the following reappointments for consideration: Planning Commission - Three (3) Year Terms to Expire June 1, 2013 John H. Baldwin, Sr. - Fourth District Ron Shomo - Fourth District Michael Hemmig - At-Large Dover Public Library Commission - Five (5) Year Term to Expire June 16, 2015 Lois J. Dunning

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 15 By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the reappointments to the Planning Commission and Dover Public Library Commission as recommended by Mayor Carey. The motion was seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCES Council President Hogan reminded the public that copies of the Proposed Ordinance are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. Final action by Council on the Proposed Ordinances will take place during the Council Meeting of June 28, 2010. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the Ordinance Amendments as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: < ORDINANCE #2010-20 - NOTIFICATION OF TAX RATE INCREASE OVER THE ROLLED BACK TAX RATE [REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 22 DELAWARE CODE, SECTION 1105(B)] < ORDINANCE #2010-19 - BUDGET ORDINANCES - 2010/2011 CITY OF DOVER BUDGET < GENERAL FUND - CASH RECEIPTS AND BUDGET < GOVERNM ENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUES AND BUDGET < GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUE AND BUDGET < GENERAL CAPITAL ASSET REPLACEM ENT FUND - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUE AND BUDGET < MUNICIPAL STREET AID FUND - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUE AND BUDGET < WATER /WASTEWATER FUND - REVENUE AND BUDGET < W A T E R /W A S T E W A T E R IM P R O V E M E N T A N D E X T E N S IO N F U N D - C A S H RECEIPTS /REVENUE AND BUDGET < WATER /WASTEWATER CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUE AND BUDGET < WATER /WASTEWATER CONTINGENCY RESERVE - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUE AND BUDGET < ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND - REVENUE AND BUDGET < ELECTRIC UTILITY IM PROVEM ENT AND EXTENSION FUND - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUE AND BUDGET < ELECTRIC UTILITY CONTINGENCY RESERVE - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUE AND BUDGET < ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPRECIATION RESERVE - SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS < ELECTRIC UTILITY FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE - SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS < ELECTRIC UTILITY INSURANCE STABILIZATION RESERVE - SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS < ELECTRIC UTILITY RATE STABILIZATION RESERVE - SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS < WORKERS COM PENSATION FUND - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUE AND BUDGET < COM M UNITY TRANSPORTATION IM PROVEM ENT FUND - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUE AND BUDGET < OPEB (OT H ER POST -RETIREM ENT BENEFITS ) RESERVE FU N D - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUES AND BUDGET < PARKLAND /RECREATION RESERVE - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUES AND BUDGET < LIBRARY RESERVE - CASH RECEIPTS /REVENUES AND BUDGET < DOWNTOWN DOVER BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - CASH RECEIPTS/BUDGET FY2010-2011 < PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-13 - FURLOUGHS AND PENSION PLAN CLOSING

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 16 COUNCIL MEMBERS ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. McGiffin encouraged everyone to attend the African American Festival on Saturday, June 26, 2010 from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Legislative Mall. Mrs. Russell noted that staff had previously indicated assurance that a policy would be developed to allow extra consideration for City of Dover residents when applying for City positions. Responding, Mr. DePrima stated that this is a goal that has been established for the Human Resources Department and that there has been progress made towards this end. However, he noted that, this four (4) person department has been short one (1) employee, which has resulting in some departmental goals not being accomplished. As a result, Mr. DePrima indicated that he has extended this goal and hoped to have a program developed by the Fall of 2010. He explained that a part of the goal was to develop a Handbook amendment to allow preference for applicants who live within the City; however, there were additional goals included to help improve minority representation. Mr. Ruane commended the Fire and Police Departments for the manner in which they handled a recent tragic fire. After speaking with Fire Chief Christiansen, he indicated that it may be necessary for the City to consider additional legislation to promote fire safety and stated his willingness to assist the Department in this endeavor. Echoing Mr. Ruane, Mr. Bonar indicated he has had several conversations with Fire Chief Christiansen as well as the Fire Marshall’s Office, and he stated that there is a distinct need for a review of the City’s ordinances as they relate to fire alarms. Council President Hogan referred to a recent article in a local newspaper which recognized the Police Department and commended the actions of the Department staff for their heroic actions during the fire mentioned by Mr. Ruane. Mr. Salters referred to a natural gas incident that occurred at his residence and stated that the Dover Fire Department, Chesapeake Utilities, and Eashum Plumbing responded and resolved the problem. Mrs. Russell noted that Woodcrest is an old complex; however, it was her feeling that there was a need for the City to consider a sprinkler system ordinance. Mr. Leary moved for adjournment, seconded by Mrs. Williams and unanimously carried. Meeting Adjourned at 8:20 P.M. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 17 All orders, ordinances, and resolutions adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of June 14, 2010, are hereby approved. CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. MAYOR /TM/jg S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Council-Minutes\2010\06-14-2010 Council.wpd Exhibit Attached to Original Minutes and File Copy Exhibit #1 - Ordinance #2010-12 - Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 30 - Recreational and Open Space Zone and Article 4 - Zoning Bulk and Parking Regulations

City Council’s Board of Assessment Appeals May 05, 2010 The Board of Assessment Appeals was brought to order at 9:04 A.M. by City Assessor Cheryl Russell. Board Members present were: James Welsh, Todd Stonesifer and William T. Garfinkel. Staff present was : City Assessor Cheryl Russell and Administrative Assistant Annette Hart. 1. Exemptions A. 1. A & I Housing Inc. Location: 80 N Halsey Road - ED05-68.18-02-74.00 Background and Analysis Original: $135,000 Request: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel falls under State Statute §8105 Property owned by Governmental religious educational or charitable agency. A & I Housing Inc. Does not meet the required date of July 14, 1988 for the creation of their corporation and therefore may be ineligible. Recommended Actions: Staff recommends consideration of approval. No one from A & I Housing Inc. was present at the hearing. Ms Russell went over the code and made it clear that even though the organization does not meet the required date of July 14, 1988, staff recommends that the property be exempt. Mr. Garfinkel was wondering about the relation of the owner and the subcontract they have, because it appears that they manage the houses. In the state law it states that if the property is sold for investment, they are not entitled for an exemption, he went on to say that if the owner was present at the meeting, that would have been a question that would have been asked. Mr. Garfinkel did want it to go on record, that the board was not able to ask the appellant any question, as no one was present. Mr. Stonesifer explained that in his understanding A & I Housing Inc. purchases homes, in his case older homes, fixes them up and rents the homes to mentally challenged individuals at a very low rent.

Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to recommend the organization to receive exemption status, as they non profit, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0 2. A & I Housing Inc. Location: 235 N New St - ED05-076.08-02-63.03 Background and Analysis Original: $128,700 Request: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel falls under State Statute §8105 Property owned by Governmental religious educational or charitable agency. A & I Housing Inc. Does not meet the required date of July 14, 1988 for the creation of their corporation and therefore may be ineligible. Recommended Actions: Staff recommends consideration of approval. Mr. Garfinkel was wondering about the relation of the owner and the subcontract they have, because it appears that they manage the houses. In the state law it states that if the property is sold for investment, they are not entitled for an exemption, he went on to say that if the owner was present at the meeting, that would have been a question that would have been asked. Mr. Garfinkel did want it to go on record, that the board was not able to ask the appellant any question, as no one was present. Mr. Stonesifer explained that in his understanding A & I Housing Inc. purchases homes, in his case older homes, fixes them up and rents the homes to mentally challenged individuals at a very low rent. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to recommend the organization to receive exemption status, as they are non profit, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0

3. A & I Housing Inc. Location: 728 Maple Parkway - ED05-068.18-05-01.00 Background and Analysis Original: $133,300 Request: Exemption Status This parcel falls under State Statute §8105 Property owned by Governmental religious educational or charitable agency. A & I Housing Inc. Does not meet the required date of July 14, 1988 for the creation of their corporation and therefore may be ineligible. Recommended Actions: Staff recommends consideration of approval. Mr. Garfinkel was wondering about the relation of the owner and the subcontract they have, because it appears that they manage the houses. In the state law it states that if the property is sold for investment, they are not entitled for an exemption, he went on to say that if the owner was present at the meeting, that would have been a question that would have been asked. Mr. Garfinkel did want it to go on record, that the board was not able to ask the appellant any question, as no one was present. Mr. Stonesifer explained that in his understanding A & I Housing Inc. purchases homes, in his case older homes, fixes them up and rents the homes to mentally challenged individuals at a very low rent. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to recommend the organization to receive exemption status, as they are non profit, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0 B. 1. DIMA IX Inc.

Location: 456 E Loockerman St.- ED05-077.06-01-67.00 Background and Analysis Original: $206,300 Request: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel falls under State Statute §8105 Property owned by Governmental religious educational or charitable agency. DIMA IX Inc. does not meet the required date of July 14, 1988 for the creation of their corporation and therefore may be ineligible. Recommended Actions: Staff recommends consideration of approval. Ms. Russell explained to the board that this company is the same affiliation as A & I Housing Inc. It is the same situation as A & I Housing Inc. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to recommend the organization to receive exemption status, as they are non profit, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0 2. DIMA IX Inc. Location: 223 Mifflin Road - ED05-076.10-02-03.01 Background and Analysis Original: $212,400 Request: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel falls under State Statute §8105 Property owned by Governmental religious educational or charitable agency. DIMA IX Inc. does not meet the required date of July 14, 1988 for the creation of their corporation and therefore may be ineligible. Recommended Actions: Staff recommends consideration of approval. Ms. Russell explained to the board that this company is the same affiliation as A & I Housing Inc.

It is the same situation as A & I Housing Inc. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to recommend the organization to receive exemption status, as they are non profit, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0 3. DIMA I X Inc. Location: 15 Pin Oak Dr. - ED05-067.14-04-23.00 Background and Analysis Original: $197,300 Request: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request This parcel falls under State Statute §8105 Property owned by Governmental religious educational or charitable agency. DIMA IX Inc. does not meet the required date of July 14, 1988 for the creation of their corporation and therefore may be ineligible. Recommended Actions: Staff recommends consideration of approval. Ms. Russell explained to the board that this company is the same affiliation as A & I Housing Inc. It is the same situation as A & I Housing Inc. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to recommend the organization to receive exemption status, as they are non profit, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0 C. 1. Pennsylvania Lines LLC Location: Land/Tracks - S West St. - ED05-076.08-01-43.00

Background and Analysis Original: $150,000 Request: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel falls under State Statue 9 Del. C. §8108 Railroad property. Ms. Russell told the board that no one was present to represent this organization. She went on to explain, that she recommends this property be approved from exemption as it falls under State Statue 9 Del. C. §80108 Railroad property. Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to approve the request for exemption, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0 2. Pennsylvania Lines LLC Location: Land/Tracks - New Burton Road Background and Analysis Original $729,000 Request Exemption Status Reason for Exemption: This parcel falls under Stat Statue 9 Del. C. §8108 Railroad property. Ms. Russell told the board that no one was present to represent this organization. She went on to explain, that she recommends this property be approved from exemption as it falls under State Statue 9 Del. C. §80108 Railroad property Mr. Stonesifer made the motion to approve the request for exemption, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0 D. 1. Village of Westover Homeowners Assoc. Location: Open Spaces - Village of Westover

Parcel Original Request ED05-076.09-02-01 $113,300 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-01-57.00 $ 71,900 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-01-58.00 $143,000 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-02-57.00 $ 7,100 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-02-58.00 $ 94,100 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-02-59.00 $ 39,200 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-02-60.00 $ 98,000 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-02-61.00 $ 39,200 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-03-18.00 $121,500 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-03-31.00 $ 27,400 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-04-64.00 $ 23,100 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-04-65.00 $ 19,200 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-04-66.00 $ 12,600 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-04-87.00 $ 37,400 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-05-48.00 $ 28,600 Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel falls under Stat Statue C.§8110 Civic organizations owning parkland. Mrs. Grden represented the homeowners Association via phone. Ms Russell pointed out to the board and Mrs. Grt that under Delaware State Law if the land is owned by a homeowner association they would be able to be exempt . Mr Stoneseifer made the motion to approve the exemption status, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0 E. Westover LLC Location: Open Spaces - Village of Westover Parcel Original Request ED05-0746.09-02-39.00 $ 29,000 Exemption Status ED05-076.10-02-87.00 $666,000 Exemption Status

ED05-076.10-02-89.00 $ 70,600 Exemption Status ED05-076.13-03-33.00 $165,800 Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel does not fall under State Statute 9 Del. C. §8110 Civic organizations owning parkland. Ms. Russell pointed out that these 4 properties is to deny, because they are not owned by the homeowner association but by the developer. Mr. Stonesifer asked if this land is to be turned over into the name of the homeowners association at which time Mrs. Grden explained that the land is still in the name of Westover LLC and that this was an oversight. She went on to explain that the homeowner association is maintaining the open spaces. Mr Garfinkel made the motion to deny the request for exemption which was seconded by Mr. Stoneseifer. Motion carried 3-0 F. Robino-Sea Chase LLC Location: Open Spaces - Village of Westover Parcel Original Request ED05-076.09-02-86.00 $ 9,800 Exemption Status ED05-076.09-02-87.00 $ 23,500 Exemption Status ED05-076.09-02-88.00 $ 54,900 Exemption Status ED05-076.09-02-89.00 $ 5,900 Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel do not fal under State Statute 9 Del. C. §8110 Civic organizations owning parkland. Ms. Russell also recommends to deny these properties, as they do not fall under the Homeowner Association. Mr. Stoneseifer asked why the homeowner association is filing for exemption, when these parcels are not owned by them. Mr. Stonesifer made the recommended to deny the request for exemption which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0

City Council’s Board of Assessment Appeals May 26, 2010 The Board of Assessment Appeals was brought to order at 9:00 A.M. by City Assessor Cheryl Russell. Board Members present were: James Welsh, Tom Burns and William T. Garfinkel. Staff present was : City Assessor Cheryl Russell and Administrative Assistant Annette Hart. Exemptions A. Persimmon Park Place Condominium Council Inc. Location: 110 Persimmon Cir. - LC05-058.17-03-2.00 Background and Analysis Original: $318,500 Requested: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel falls under State Statute 9 Del. C. §8110 Civic Organizations owning parkland. Mr. Tolbert was there to speak for the Corporation. He brought with him a letter in which he explains that Persimmon Park Place Condominium Council Inc. is a not for profit organization and that the general purpose for the organization is to maintain, operate and administer the common element areas and community facilities in Persimmon Park Place Condominium Mobile Park Development. Mr. Garfinkel asked for which areas the exemption is being sought. Mr. Tolbert explained that they are Parking Lots, Pool, Park Areas, Club House, etc. Ms. Russell explained that it is all on one parcel. Mr. Burns ask if the public is allowed on these areas at which time Mr. Tolbert said that only residence are allowed and only those who are invited by residence. Mr. Tolbert made it clear to the board understands that these areas are only for those who live there. Mr. Burns asked if anyone who is on the Association would be able to rent the pool area to outsiders in order to earn extra money, Mr. Tolbert told him that this is not the case. After Mr. Tolbert left the room the board went into liberation. Ms. Russell pointed out that in the Delaware State Code the word “or”, is used not the word “and” as earlier discussed, she believes that as long as the members are allowed to use the areas without being charged it is the Assessor’s recommendation to grant the exemption. Mr. Burns asked if “or” is the correct wording and what the City’s Legal Opinion is? Ms. Russell pointed out the Village of Westover is also exempt. After some deliberation Mr. Burns asked if Ms. Russell could get a legal opinion of the definition of the land.

Ms. Russell suggested the Exemption request to be tabled until a legal opinion has been obtained. Mr. Burns made to motion to table the Exemption to get a legal opinion of the definition of the land, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0 B. First Pilgrim Baptist Church Location: 350 Frear Drive - ED05-068.14-01-14.00 Background and Analysis Original: $142,100 Requested: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel falls under State Statute 9 De. C.§8105 Property owned by governmental, religious, educational or charitable agency. The board introduced themselves to Mrs. Miles, who is also the pastor of First Pilgrim Baptist church. Mrs. Miles asked the board, that the day-care center located at 350 Frear Drive, be exempted and that the church is a non-profit organization. She told the board that the upstairs of the building, is not rented out. Mrs. Miles explained that the church is not gaining any funding from the daycare center and that in fact 75% of the daycare center is funded by the church. The church has not pursued the idea of renting out the upstairs of the building as there are to many rules and regulation with running a daycare center. She went on to say, that only church members are helping out with the daycare as means of some income for them. Mrs. Miles told the board that the First Pilgrim Baptist church does have an exemption with the Levy Court. Mr. Garfinkel asked if the daycare is properly zoned with the City, at which time Mrs. Miles assured that all of the proper steps have been taken. Mr. Garfinkel also asked who the property was purchased from and was told that the property was purchased from a family in that area. Mrs. Miles was asked if anybody is living in the property, she replied that no one lives there it is only used as a daycare. Mr. Garfinkel asked if the property is payed for by church funds and was told that the church does pay for the property. Mr. Burns asked if any part of the house is donated to the church and if the person that sold the house to church was a member of the church, which they were not. Mr. Burns asked how many children are allowed to be in the daycare center. Mrs. Miles told him that they are allowed 28 children, 14 during the day and 14 at night, which she explained that they have never had that many children at the daycare center. She explained that the State does not fund as much to daycare facilities anymore as they did in the past and that some families pay $25-$50 per week. After Mr. Garfinkel asked the question if any of the Board Member of the church work at the daycare, Mrs. Miles replied, that one of the board members does help out whenever one of the child care providers is absent. Mr. Burns went on to

summerize, that the daycare has 12 students, who’s families are paying a portion, the State pays a portion and the church subsidizes the rest of the cost. Mrs. Miles explained that the original intent for the daycare was to help out church members who cannot afford daycare and that perhaps the money generated by the daycare would pay the mortgage, which has not happened yet. Mr. Burns asked how much the mortgage was, which according to Mrs. Miles is $1,500 per month. Mrs. Miles was asked if any of the members help with cutting the grass, at which time she explained that her husband takes care of the gras cutting. Mr. Burns asked if the church, which is located in the town of Camden has daycare facility . Mrs. Miles replied that would be nice, but would also create problems, especially with funerals and church services, when the fellowship hall needs to be used. Mr. Burns asked why a church, that is based in Camden, would create a daycare in the City of Dover, when they are not even renting out the second floor. Mrs. Miles explained that she lives in Dover and most of her parishioners live in Dover as well. She said that they did look for a property in Camden but when this house came available they decided to buy it as she lives close to the property and is able to look over things much easier. After Mrs. Miles left, the board deliberated. Mr. Burns explained that there are lot of rules and regulation related to daycare. Mr. Burns was wondering why the property was exempt from the Transfer Tax at the time of purchase, when the church is clearly paying a mortgage, which means that there was in fact a purchase price. .Ms. Russell explained that because they were exempt they did not have to disclose the amount of the sale, which is part of a Delaware law. Mr. Burns asked how other daycare in the city are assessed. Ms. Russell said that usually daycare’s are within the residence, where they are assessed as residential homes. One daycare in the city which is exempt, is “Moms House” which is for single moms. Mr. Burns explains that the daycare in question does employ people. Ms. Russell suggested to table the matter and get a legal opinion, to find out what information the county used to exempt this property. Motion to table the manner was made by Mr. Burns seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion accepted 3-0 C. Young Men’s Christian Association of Delaware Inc. Location: 1145 S. State St. - ED05-077.17-05-57.00

Background and Analysis Original: 245,000 Requested: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel fall under State Statute 9 Del. C. §8106 Specific organizations and purposes. Mr. Kelly and Mr. Pool were present to represent the YMCA. The gentleman explained that the YMCA purchased the property to expand the facility to add a gym. After the gentleman left the room the board deliberated. Mr. Welsh made the motion to exempt the property which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0 D. Young Men’s Christian Association of Delaware Inc. Location: 1169 S State Street - ED05-077.17-05-58.00 Background and Analysis Original: $322,000 Request: Exemptions Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel fall under State Statute 9 Del. C. §8106 Specific organizations and purposes. Mr. Kelly and Mr. Pool were present to represent the YMCA. The gentleman explained that the YMCA purchased the property to expand the facility to add a gym. After the gentleman left the room the board deliberated. Mr. Welsh made the motion to exempt the property which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0 D. Correctional Officers Association of Delaware

Location: 1243 College Park Drive - ED05-067.00-02-12.09 Background and Analysis Original: $ 691,600 Request: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel has a 501 ( c ) 5 status with the Federal Government. At this time, they do not have an exemption with Kent County. An opinion was requested from the Assessor’s Office, please see attached. Before the meeting Mr. Russell explained to the board that the representative for this property had called into the office to let the board know that he would not be able to make the meeting, due to health reasons. Ms. Russell suggested to go over the documents supplied to the board and make a decision based on this information. Ms. Russell recommended denial as the organization does not have an exemption with the county. After Ms. Russell found out that the organization does not have an exemption from the county, she asked for a legal opinion, which also suggested the organization does not qualify. Mr. Garfinkel said that based on the legal opinion provided by Ms. Russell, there would be no reason to exempt this property. Mr. Garfinkel made the motion to deny the exemption, which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried. 3-0

City Council’s Board of Assessment Appeals June 09, 2010 The Board of Assessment Appeals was brought to order at 9:30 A.M. by City Assessor Cheryl Russell. Board Members present were: James Welsh, Tom Burns and William T. Garfinkel. Staff present was : City Assessor Cheryl Russell and Administrative Assistant Annette Hart and Paul Miller from Tyler Technologies. Exemptions A. Persimmon Park Place Condominium Council Inc. Location: 110 Persimmon Cir. - LC05-058.17-03-2.00 Background and Analysis Original: $318,500 Requested: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel falls under State Statute 9 Del. C. §8110 Civic Organizations owning parkland. “Minutes taken from the original appeal hearing May 26,2010" “Mr. Tolbert was there to speak for the Corporation. He brought with him a letter in which he explains that Persimmon Park Place Condominium Council Inc. is a not organized for profit organization and that the general purpose for the organization is to maintain, operate and administer the common element areas and community facilities in Persimmon Park Place Condominium Mobile Park Development. Mr. Garfinkel asked for which areas the exemption is being sought. Mr. Tolbert explained that they are Parking Lots, Pool, Park Areas, Club House, etc. Ms. Russell explained that it is all on one parcel. Mr. Burns ask if the public is allowed on these areas at which time Mr. Tolbert said that only residence are allowed and only those who are invited by residence. Mr. Tolbert made it clear to the board understands that these areas are only for those who live there. Mr. Burns asked if anyone who is on the Association would be able to rent the pool area to outsiders in order to earn extra money, Mr. Tolbert told him that this is not the case. After Mr. Tolbert left the room the board went into deliberation. Ms. Russell pointed out that in the Delaware State Code the word “or”, is used not the word “and” as earlier discussed, she believes that as long as the members are allowed to use the areas without being charged it is the Assessor’s recommendation to grant the exemption. Mr. Burns asked if “or” is the correct wording and what the City’s Legal Opinion is? Ms. Russell pointed out the Village of Westover is also exempt. After

some deliberation Mr. Burns asked if Ms. Russell could get a legal opinion of the definition of the land. Ms. Russell suggested the Exemption request to be tabled until a legal opinion has been obtained. Mr. Burns made to motion to table the Exemption to get a legal opinion of the definition of the land, which was seconded by Mr. Garfinkel. Motion carried 3-0" This request for Exemption was brought back to the board on June 09, 2010 after the requested legal opinion had been obtained. Mr. Garfinkel expressed that these spaces are not public open space but private open space. Ms. Russell explained that each development is required to have a certain amount of open space. Mr. Burns asked if all open spaces in the City of Dover are exempt at which time Ms. Russell explained that the exemptions have to be requested same as Village of Westover, which was just granted an exemption a couple of weeks prior. The parcels do have to be in the name of the Homeowners Association, they cannot be in the builders name. Mr. Burns asked the question if once the open space has been exempt, if anybody can come an use those areas. Mr. Garfinkel expressed the same concern, as he had asked the question at the first hearing and was told by Mr. Tolbert, that only people that own property in the neighborhood would be allowed to use those areas. In Mr. Burns’s opinion, the open spaces should be taxed ever so slightly, so the open spaces stay private, because he believes that if the open spaces are public other people will use it. Mr. Miller pointed out to the board, that if for some reason anybody starts using the open spaces, that then the homeowner association could request the exemption to be lifted, he also pointed out to the board that the homeowners association asked for the exemption. Mr. Burns made the motion to grant the exemption which was seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion carried 3-0 B. First Pilgrim Baptist Church Location: 350 Frear Drive - ED05-068.14-01-14.00 Background and Analysis Original: $142,100 Requested: Exemption Status Reason for Exemption Request: This parcel falls under State Statute 9 De. C.§8105 Property owned by governmental, religious, educational of charitable agency.

“Minutes taken from the original appeal hearing May 26,2010" “The board introduced themselves to Mrs. Miles, who is also the pastor of First Pilgrim Baptist church. Mrs. Miles asked the board, that the day-care center located at 350 Frear Drive, be exempted and that the church is a non-profit organization. She told the board that the upstairs of the building, is not rente out. Mrs. Miles explained that the church is not gaining any funding from the daycare center and that in fact 75% of the daycare center is funded by the church. The church has not pursuit the idea of renting out the upstairs of the building as there are to many rules and regulation with running a daycare center. She went on to say, that only church members are helping out with the daycare as means of some income for them. Mrs. Miles told the board that the First Pilgrim Baptist church does have an exemption with the Levy Court. Mr. Garfinkel asked if the daycare is properly zoned with the City, at which time Mrs. Miles assured that all of the proper steps have been taken. Mr. Garfinkel also asked who the property was purchased from and was told that the property was purchased from a family in that area. Mrs. Miles was asked if anybody is living in the property, she replied that no one lives there it is only used as a daycare. Mr. Garfinkel asked if the property is payed for by church funds and was told that the church does pay for the property. Mr. Burns asked if any part of the house is donated to the church and if the person that sold the house to church was a member of the church, which they were not. Mr. Burns asked how many children are allowed to be in the daycare center. Mrs. Miles told him that they are allowed 28 children, 14 during the day and 14 at night, which she explained that they have never had that many children at the daycare center. She explained that the State does not fund as much to daycare facilities anymore as they did in the past and that some families pay $25-$50 per week. After Mr. Garfinkel asked the question if any of the Board Member of the church work at the daycare, Mrs. Miles replied, that one of the board members does help out whenever one of the child care providers is absent. Mr. Burns went on to summerize, that the daycare has 12 students, who’s families are paying a portion, the State pays a portion and the church subsidizes the rest of the cost. Mrs. Miles explained that the original intend for the daycare was to help out church members who cannot afford daycare and that perhaps the money generated by the daycare would pay the mortgage, which has not happened yet. Mr. Burns asked how much the mortgage was, which according to Mrs. Miles is $1,500 per month. Mrs. Miles was asked if any of the members help with cutting the gras, at which time she explained that her husband takes care of the gras cutting. Mr. Burns asked if the church, which is located in the town of Camden has daycare facility . Mrs. Miles replied that would be nice, but would also create problems, especially with funerals and church services, when the fellowship hall needs to be used. Mr. Burns asked why a church, that is based in Camden, would create a daycare in the City of Dover, when they are not eve renting out the second floor. Mrs. Miles explained that she lives in Dover and most of her parishioners live in Dover as well. She said that they did look for a property in Camden but when this house came available they decided to buy it as she lives close to the property and is able to look over things much easier. After Mrs. Miles left, the board deliberated. Mr. Burns explained that there are lot of rules and regulation related to daycare. Mr. Burns was wondering why the property was exempt from the Transfer Tax at the time of purchase, when the church is clearly paying a mortgage, which means that there was in fact a purchase price. .Mr. Russell explained that because they are church they did not have to disclose the amount of the sale,

which is part of a Delaware law. Mr. Burns asked how other daycare in the city are assessed. Ms. Russel said that usually daycare’s are within the residence, where they are assessed as residential homes. One daycare in the city which is exempt, is “Moms House” which is for single moms. Mr. Burns explains that in the daycare in question does employ people. Ms. Russell suggested to table the matter and get a legal opinion, to find out what information the county used to exempt this property. Motion to table the manner was made by Mr. Burns seconded by Mr. Welsh. Motion accepted 3-0" This request for Exemption was brought back to the board on June 09, 2010 after the requested legal opinion had been obtained. After the board read over the legal opinion Mr. Garfinkel raised the question, about the daycare being a business. Mr. Burns remembered that Mrs. Miles had said that the church is paying for the mortgage, which in Mr. Burns’s opinion, is what the daycare is used for. Mr. Miller (Tyler Technologies) pointed out that the use of the daycare is for charity purposes. In Mr. Millers opinion the question is the organization for profit or for charity? . Mr. Burns expressed his concern about the location of the property. He was wondering if a church which is located in the town of Camden, would buy a home in the city of Dover to use as a daycare. In his opinion the organization was making money, as they have a mortgage to pay. Mr. Burns said that most residential daycares have the owner living in the home and are taxed. Ms. Russell pointed out that those daycares are making money. He also pointed out that Mrs. Miles did say that one of the board members does work at the daycare. Ms. Russell pointed out that it had been said that the board member helping out was only helping out if the daycare was short one person. In Mr. Millers opinion the church is not making any money, when Mr. Garfinkel pointed out that the daycare is making money. In Mr. Burns’s opinion the daycare is hiding behind the church and used to pay for the mortgage. Ms. Russell pointed to the YMCA which the board just granted exemption for, they also have a daycare in the facility. In Mr. Garfinkel’s opinion, the YMCA cannot be compared to this daycare, this was a property bought for a specific purpose. Ms. Russell explained that if Mrs. Miles would start renting out the upstairs, then the building would only be 50% exempt. In Mr. Burns’s and Mr. Garfinkel’s opinion, the lawyer was not very clear in explaining the law. Ms. Russell explained that if the organization would bring in people and charge for daycare that would be for profit, but in this case the church is trying to help out its less fortunate church goers. Mr. Garfinkel stated that if the daycare was in the church he would not have a problem, but since a house was bought for purpose of daycare, it does not seem clear to him. Mr. Burns made the motion to deny the request for exemption, which was seconded by Mr.Garfinkel. Motion carried 2-1 (Welsh voted against motion)

UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee Meeting was held on June 14, 2010 at 5:00 p.m. with Chairman Ruane presiding. Members present were Mr. Bonar, Mr. McGiffin, Major Kosior, and Mr. Snaman. Members of Council present included Council President Hogan and Mr. Leary. Mayor Carey was also present (arrived at 5:10 p.m.). AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Snaman moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Bonar and unanimously carried. National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit In response to inquiries and a request of Mr. Ruane, Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, and Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, provided members with information regarding the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit. The information explained what the Dover NPDES permit is, how it has been administered in the past, and how it will be administered it in the future. Mrs. Townshend advised members that the City of Dover operates what the Federal government recognizes as a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. Under the National Clean Water Act, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates these systems through state environmental agencies. In Delaware, the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) is the delegated regulatory agency under the EPA. The purpose of regulation is to minimize pollution that flows into local rivers and streams from municipal storm systems. Typically this includes any pollutant that falls on roadways, including litter, car oil, household chemicals dumped down drains, and fertilizers or pesticides applied to lawns. In August 2003, DNREC issued a five (5)-year permit to the City of Dover that required the City to take measures to encourage the removal of pollutants from stormwater run-off that ultimately ends up in the City’s water bodies, including Silver Lake and the St. Jones River. Mrs. Townshend stated that the permit includes six (6) measures and a series of actions to be completed each year, as follows: 1) public education and outreach; 2) public involvement and participation; 3) illicit discharge detection and elimination; 4) construction site stormwater runoff control; 5) post-construction stormwater management in newly developed areas and redeveloped areas; and 6) pollution prevention and good housekeeping She indicated that originally, the Public Works Department was responsible for the permit, and it was assigned to the engineering staff within that department. In 2006, with the reorganization of Public Works, Planning, and Public Utilities, the engineering staff moved to the Public Utilities Department; however, management of the permit remained under what became the Public Services Department. With no specific staff assigned to manage this responsibility, completing the

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 2 requirements became an increased challenge. Staff from various divisions and departments (including Geographic Information System (GIS), Public Affairs, Engineering, and Planning) were contributing to the effort. Mr. DePrima explained that it became increasingly evident that the skills of the Planning Department were much better suited to coordinating the permitting documents and reporting them to DNREC. Over the last year, the Planning Office has worked with the Public Services Manager/Director of Public Works to bring the permit up to date. City staff has met with DNREC staff on numerous occasions to resolve issues associated with the permit, and a number of permit requirements are being implemented. Mr. DePrima advised members that the City will strengthen implementation of a committee approach to future permit management. Utilizing this approach, the Planning Department will be responsible for making NPDES permit applications, monitoring progress, and filing reports with DNREC. Various departments will be assigned action items related to the permit, and those action items will be included in department goals and performance evaluation goals of staff members. Responding to Mr. Bonar regarding improvements to the runoff into Silver Lake since 2003, Mr. Scott Koenig, Public Services Manager/Director of Public Works, advised members that the City is not currently required to conduct chemical or quantitative analysis on the waters entering Silver Lake or the St. Jones and explained the difficulties in measuring such pollutants. He stated that, currently, the permit requires assurance that the City is educating the public on practices that will improve water quality, and is less concerned with empirical analysis of hard data. He stated that these education efforts include improving construction techniques, mapping and maintaining the system, etc., and measurements would be based on improvements, such as the construction of a stormwater pond, rather than measurement of contaminants. Also in response to Mr. Bonar, Mr. Koenig stated that control measures have been instituted by Delaware State University. During the past 5-10 years, there have been quantitative construction improvements at Delaware State University that would, from an engineering standpoint, result in a scientific response that there has been an improvement to the water quality; however, it would be difficult to measure this improvement. Mr. Bonar recollected the use of Silver Lake, several years ago, as a prime recreational resource area that was used for swimming, water skiing, etc. He expressed his hope that the quality of the lake could be restored so that it could once again be utilized in this fashion. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that a study was conducted that indicated that significant financial investments would be required to restore Silver Lake as a recreational area. In addition, he explained that management of Silver Lake requires a cooperative effort from the County and several other entities outside the City’s jurisdiction. Mr. Koenig noted that, although City resources spent on the Lake would assist in its improvement, this would not resolve the issue, since the City would be treating the problem at the end rather than resolving the factors that initially create the pollutants. Mr. Koenig added that, although Silver Lake is a major water asset in the City, it is only a small aspect of the MS4 permit.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 3 Referring to Measurement #5, post-construction stormwater management in newly developed areas and redeveloped areas, Mr. Ruane questioned if the current permit refers to any objectives related to the maintenance of stormwater ponds. Responding, Mrs. Townshend stated that the requirements regarding stormwater ponds are under the jurisdiction of the Kent Conservation District. The permit does require the adoption of ordinances relating to the area of stormwater, and she anticipated this would be addressed through the committee process. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Townshend stated that a letter was received in May 2010 from DNREC that included requirements of the City to be completed by November 1, 2010 in order to renew the permit. Mr. Ruane requested that the Committee be provided periodic updates on this issue. Mr. DePrima reminded members that there is a City Council session scheduled for Wednesday, June 16, 2010, to review the City Manager’s performance goals and that one of his goals is to produce a report to Council describing Wilmington’s stormwater management system utility, the systems that other municipalities have implemented in this regard, and the availability of funding for this type of project. Mr. DePrima introduced Ms. Laura Allison, DNREC - Silver Lake/St. Jones Watershed Coordinator, whose responsibility is to focus on the improvement and management of the St. Jones Watershed and Silver Lake. Ms. Allison stated that she was recently assigned to this position and looks forward to working with the City. Mr. Bonar encouraged staff to research the possibility of securing grants for this project. Mr. DePrima assured members that staff is poised to pursue grants since Silver Lake is “the most studied lake in Delaware”; however, he cautioned that estimated costs to eradicate the problems at the Lake are significant. The report was accepted by unanimous consent. Mr. Bonar requested that staff contact Ms. Katherine Hamilton, President of GridWise Alliance, to request that a presentation be made to the Committee on the subject of “Smart Meters”. By unanimous consent, the meeting adjourned at 5:35 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Eugene B. Ruane Chairman EBR/JS/jg/ac/tm S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Minutes\2010\06-14-2010 Utility.wpd

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting was held on June 14, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. with Chairman Leary presiding. Members present were Mr. McGiffin, Mr. Salters (arrived at 6:14 p.m.) , Dr. Jones, and Mr. Shevock. Members of Council present were Mrs. Russell (arrived at 6:51 p.m.) , Mr. Bonar, Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Williams (arrived at 6:18 p.m.) , and Council President Hogan. Mayor Carey was also present. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Dr. Jones moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. Review and Recommendation - Filling of Critical Positions During their meeting of February 23, 2009, members recommended approval of the Hiring Freeze for Fiscal Year 2008-2009, but to allow the hiring of critical positions through the review and approval of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee and City Council. It was suggested that there be a “standing” agenda item to consider the filling of critical positions and, if there are no positions to consider, the item could be removed. Permanent Full time and Temporary Full-Time Administrative Assistant - City Clerk’s Office Members considered a request for permission to recruit for a permanent, full-time Administrative Assistant position in the City Clerk’s Office. In addition, members were provided a request to waive Article V – Recruitment and Selection, Section 1 – Recruitment Sources of the Employee Handbook and temporarily hire the previous Records Management Coordinator, Ms. Denise Devine, until a permanent employee can be hired. Mrs. Traci McDowell, City Clerk, reviewed the permission to recruit and reminded members that Mrs. Rebecca Rollison was recently promoted to Fire Chief’s Assistant with the Fire Department. She also reminded members that Ms. Devine is fully trained in records management, conduct of municipal elections, and Clerk’s Office administrative responsibilities, including preparation of Council packets (paper and paperless), and would be available for immediate employment. Responding to Mr. Leary, Mrs. McDowell stated that the process for hiring to fill a vacant position is lengthy and, referring to the recent filling of the Fire Chief’s Assistant position, she noted that the request for permission to recruit was considered by the Committee on January 25, 2010 and that Mrs. Rollison began serving in that capacity on May 17, 2010. In response to Dr. Jones’ concerns, Mrs. McDowell assured members that the permanent, full-time position will be opened to anyone wishing to apply. Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend that staff be granted permission to recruit for the permanent, full-time Administrative Assistant position in the City Clerk’s Office and temporarily hire the previous Records Management Coordinator, Ms. Denise Devine, until a permanent employee can be hired. The motion was seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 2 Temporary Full-Time Payroll Specialist - Finance Department Members considered a request for permission to recruit for a temporary, full-time Payroll Specialist position in the Finance Department. Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, reviewed the permission to recruit and reminded members that the City’s current Payroll Specialist, Mr. Turhan Jordan, has recently been given orders for military deployment for one (1) year. Since staff is currently working on the Request for Proposals (RFP) for outsourcing payroll services, she explained that it is not desired to make any permanent decisions regarding the position at this time. Responding to Mr. McGlumphy, Mrs. Mitchell indicated that for previous positions, it was determined that it was less expensive to utilize an employee from a temporary employment agency than to hire an employee directly. Mr. McGlumphy requested that staff provide all costs associated with filling vacant positions in the future. Dr. Jones moved to recommend that staff be granted permission to recruit for the temporary, full-time Payroll Specialist position in the Finance Department, seconded by Mr. McGiffin and unanimously carried. Medicare Part B Reimbursement Exception During their meeting of May 24, 2010, members considered a request of the International Union of the Electronic, Electric, Salaried Machine and Furniture Workers - Communication Workers of America (IUE-CWA) for a Medicare Part B reimbursement exception for a retired Field Service Representative with 33 years of service. After much discussion, the matter was tabled until receipt of a legal opinion. Mr. McGiffin moved to remove the matter from the table, seconded by Dr. Jones and unanimously carried. Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, noted the receipt of a legal opinion from Deputy City Solicitor William Pepper, Sr., which was provided to members for their review and consideration. Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend approval of this non-precedent setting request for a Medicare Part B reimbursement exception. The motion was seconded by Dr. Jones and carried with Mr. Leary voting no. Concerns Regarding Bidding by Minority Businesses (Deferred by Committee on May 24, 2010 Due to Time Constraints) Mr. Anthony DePrima, City Manager, advised members that the City has a provision within the purchasing guidelines which allows for a 3% preference if a business is a Certified Minority or Women’s Business (certified by the State of Delaware). This preference is included as a part of a bid packet, which also contains instructions on how a business can claim this preference. He stated that, to his knowledge, although the City has awarded contracts or business to minority businesses, it has not been due to the preference allowed, but rather because they had submitted the lowest bid.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 3 Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. DePrima clarified that, although some businesses have included a minority certification with their bid, they were either the lowest bidder or did not fall within the 3% range permitted for consideration. In response to Mr. Salters, Mr. DePrima stated that the City of Dover does not “set aside” a certain number of contracts to be made available only for minority bids. He was not aware of any communities that provide for a “set aside” clause and suggested that if it was the desire of members, staff would conduct further research into this matter. Mr. McGlumphy suggested that a more conscious effort be made to attract minority businesses and felt that the City often utilizes the same vendors. In addition to researching the possibility of providing “set aside” contracts, he suggested that staff develop an ordinance that provides for greater diversity in the City’s vendor preferences. Mr. Bonar suggested that staff research the minority and women’s business program provided by the State of Delaware. Mr. Clay Hammond, 505 Troon Road, advised members that he serves as the Chairman of the Delmarva Black Chamber of Commerce and member of the Governor’s Supply and Diversity Council. Rather than the development of an ordinance, he felt the City would be better served by providing a program that would encompass both above and below-bid threshold purchases. Noting the importance of small businesses to the local economy, Mr. Hammond advised members that the use of a program that promotes diversified use of small businesses would reduce unemployment, increase licensing, etc. He suggested that members review the program developed by the City of Wilmington for further consideration. Mr. Salters moved to recommend that staff be directed to study the bidding process as it relates to minorities and women and bring a program back to the Committee that would address the issues discussed by members. The motion was seconded by Dr. Jones and unanimously carried. Responding to Mr. Leary, Mr. DePrima indicated that a report could be brought back to the committee within 90 days. Proposed Ordinance #2010-18 - Appendix B - Zoning, Article 9 - Board of Adjustment Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that the State statute (Del. Code, Title 22, Chapter 3 - Municipal Zoning Regulations, Subchapter II - Board of Adjustment) establishes the legal authority for municipal boards of adjustment. Over time, case law has clarified the State law regarding the role of boards of adjustment and the standards for granting use and area variances. The standards for a variance set forth in the City of Dover Zoning Ordinance are currently more stringent than the standards supported by Delaware case law. This has created challenges for the Board of Adjustment, the Planning Staff, and applicants to the Board of Adjustment in evaluating applications to the Board.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 4 Staff provided members with a Proposed Ordinance that would bring the City’s Zoning Ordinance into compliance with the State statute and case law and help to avoid confusion in evaluating applications to the Board of Adjustment. Members were assured that the Proposed Ordinance was reviewed by City Solicitor Nicholas Rodriguez to ensure that it complies with State statute and case law. Staff recommended that Proposed Ordinance #2010-18 be forwarded to City Council for a First Reading on June 28, 2010; referred to the Planning Commission for consideration on July 19, 2010; and that a Final Reading and public hearing be set before City Council on August 9, 2010. Responding to Mr. Bonar, Mrs. Townshend stated that staff will be presenting additional amendments for consideration and that, in some instances, it will align the City more with the State. She felt that this could be a goal to be further discussed during her annual review of goals with Council. Mr. Ruane suggested that the notification process should be expanded for matters being considered by the Board of Adjustment. Responding, Mrs. Townshend stated that Section 3.1 requires notification to be provided to all property owners abutting the immediate area being considered, as well as those property owners within 200 feet. Mr. Ruane noted that, according to line 155, notification could be provided for property owners “within 200 feet or such additional distance as the board of adjustment may deem advisable...”. He felt that there were instances when the notification should be broadened. Responding, Mrs. Townshend stated that City staff would not be making such decision, since it specifies that the Board of Adjustment would be making such determination, and that if 200 feet is felt to be too narrow and should be broadened, she suggested that members consider an amendment. In response to Mr. McGiffin, Mrs. Townshend confirmed that the Board of Adjustment has a very narrow role and that the legal case for a variance is either there or not; however, during the site plan, conditional use, and subdivision process, public testimony is given consideration in making a decision. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Townshend indicated that the Proposed Ordinance does not include any provision regarding matters that have been in violation for a period of time; however, she stated that case law indicates that receiving forgiveness for being in violation rather than obtaining permission is not a reason to deny a variance. In reviewing case law, she stated that each case must be considered individually and based on the facts of the case and not based on a single issue. Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend that Proposed Ordinance #2010-18 (Attachment #1) be forwarded to City Council for a First Reading on June 28, 2010; referred to the Planning Commission for consideration on July 19, 2010; and that a Final Reading and public hearing be set before City Council on August 9, 2010. The motion was seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 5 Refunding of 2004 Electric Revenue Bonds Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, advised members that current interest rates on tax-exempt municipal bonds would provide the City of Dover with approximately $1.2 million in savings if the City refunded the 2004 Electric Revenue Bonds. She indicated that the City’s Debt Policy provides guidance for refinancing debt if the present value savings over the life of the respective issue is three percent (3%) or greater. She advised members that the savings calculated on the current 2004 Series was at 3.09% as of April 16, 2010 and that since that time, rates have lowered. Mrs. Mitchell reminded members that these bonds were issued as taxable bonds due to the previous power supply contract with Duke Energy. She explained that the City would refund the bonds with tax-exempt bonds, as permitted under IRS regulations with the structure of current power supply contracts. Once staff has completed the bond prospectus and all the necessary financing documents, Mrs. Mitchell indicated that staff would submit the final Bond Resolution to City Council for approval. She assured members that the City’s Bond Counsel has reviewed the refunding and confirmed the ability to refinance as a tax-exempt issue. Staff recommended approval to refund the 2004 Taxable Electric Revenue Bonds with Series 2010 Tax Exempt Electric Revenue Bonds. Mr. Salters moved to recommend approval to refund the 2004 Taxable Electric Revenue Bonds with Series 2010 Tax Exempt Electric Revenue Bonds, seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. Reaffirmation of Authority to Purchase Utility Commodities and Execute Contracts During the Council Meeting of May 3, 2006, Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, advised members that the City of Dover has in place an approved risk management policy associated with the purchase of energy commodity and related investment contracts. The purpose of the energy commodity and investment contracts resulting from the application of the risk management policy is: 1) to secure economic and reliable energy supply to meet the ongoing energy requirements of the City and its citizens; and 2) to provide price certainty for those end users purchasing electricity supply from the City. To facilitate the City’s continuing ability to utilize a wide array of tools to control future energy costs and secure energy supplies, the City works with multiple counterparties to establish enabling agreements that allow for a diversification of counterparty credit risk and a competitive procurement model for the purchase of energy commodity and related investments. Mrs. Mitchell reminded members that the City Manager and Mayor were authorized to sign purchase power supply agreements. PACE has since been acquiring counterparties, so that there is a diverse group of vendors for the City to make power supply purchases. She advised members that some of these vendors have requested reaffirmation from Council of authority for the City Manager and Mayor to sign the agreements.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 6 Mrs. Mitchell explained that the purpose of the request is to reaffirm that, as noted in the City Council minutes dated May 3, 2006, the City of Dover: 1) May enter into Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreements, International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreements, North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) Master Agreements, or other similar enabling agreements, along with any related schedules, credit support documents and confirmations, or other documents pertaining to any energy commodity or investment transactions; 2) May enter into energy commodity or investment transactions for a duration not to exceed six (6) years from the date of transaction execution; 3) Has authorized Pace Global Asset Management, LLC (“Pace Global”) to act as its agent for all energy commodity and related investment transactions; and 4) Has granted the City Manager and Mayor the authority to execute energy commodity and investment transactions on behalf of the City. City Clerk’s Office Note: During their Special Meeting of May 3, 2006, City Council authorized the Mayor and City Manager, individually, to enter into master agreements between suppliers of electricity and the City of Dover to establish contractual relationships for transactions to implement the electricity and fuels purchasing strategy, plan and transactions contemplated under the Energy Management Agreement with Pace Global Asset Management, LLC. Staff recommended that Council confirm the City’s ability and authority to enter into energy commodity transactions. Mr. McGiffin moved to recommend reaffirmation that the City: 1) may enter into Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreements, International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreements, North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) Master Agreements, or other similar enabling agreements, along with any related schedules, credit support documents and confirmations, or other documents pertaining to any energy commodity or investment transactions; 2) may enter into energy commodity or investment transactions for a duration not to exceed six (6) years from the date of transaction execution; 3) has authorized Pace Global Asset Management, LLC ("Pace Global") to act as its agent for all energy commodity and related investment transactions; and 4) has granted the City Manager and Mayor the authority to execute energy commodity and investment transactions on behalf of the City. The motion was seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried. Mr. McGiffin moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2010 PAGE 7 Meeting adjourned at 6:56 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Thomas J. Leary Chairman TJL/JS/jg/ac/tm S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Minutes\2010\06-14-2010 LF&A.wpd Attachments Attachment #1 - Proposed Ordinance #2010-18 - Appendix B - Zoning, Article 9 - Board of Adjustment

ATTACHMENT #1 LF&A Committee Meeting of 06/14/2010 CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-18 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN 2 COUNCIL MET: 3 4 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 9 – Board of Adjustment, be amended by inserting the text 5 indicated in blue, bold, italics and delete the text indicated in red, bold, strike-through, as follows: 6 7 ARTICLE 9. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 8 9 Section 1. Creation, appointment and organization. 10 11 There shall be a board of adjustment pursuant to the provisions of chapter 3 of title 22, 12 Municipalities, of the Delaware Code Annotated (22 Del. C. § 301 et seq.). 13 14 Section 2. Powers and duties. 15 16 The board of adjustment shall have all the powers and duties prescribed by law and by 17 this ordinance, which are more particularly specified as follows, provided that none of the 18 following provisions shall be deemed to limit any power of the said board that is conferred by 19 law: 20 21 2.1 Interpretation. On appeal from an order, requirement, decision or determination 22 made by an administrative official, or a request by any official, board or agency of the 23 city, to decide any of the following questions: 24 25 2.11 Determination of the meaning of any portion of the text of this ordinance 26 or of any condition or requirement specified or made under the provisions of 27 this ordinance. 28 29 2.12 Determination of the exact location of any district boundary shown on the 30 zoning map. 31 32 2.2 Variances. To authorize, upon appeal in specific cases, such variance from the 33 terms of this ordinance, other than variance of any use regulations, except a variance 34 permitting addition to or extension of an existing nonconforming use of a more 35 restrictive nature than the conforming use in the area as will not be contrary to the 36 public interest where, owing to exceptional and extraordinary circumstances, there are 37 practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in the way of carrying out of the strict 38 letter of this ordinance, subject to terms and conditions to be fixed by the board; 39 provided, however, that no such variance shall be granted unless the board finds: 40 41 (a) That there are physical conditions, fully described in the findings of 42 the board, applying to the land or building for which the variance is 43 sought, which conditions are peculiar to such land or building, and have 44 not resulted from any act of the applicant or any predecessor in title; 45 and 46

47 (b) That, for reasons fully set forth in the findings of the board, the 48 aforesaid circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application 49 of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of all 50 reasonable use of such land or building and the granting of the variance 51 is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building, and that the 52 variance as granted by the board is the minimum variance that will 53 accomplish this purpose; and 54 55 (c) That the granting of the variance under such conditions as the 56 board may deem necessary or desirable to apply thereto will be in 57 harmony with the general purpose and intent of this ordinance, will not 58 represent a radical departure therefrom, will not be injurious to the 59 neighborhood, will not change the character thereof and will not be 60 otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 61 62 2.21 The needs or desires of a particular owner or tenant or of a particular prospective 63 owner or tenant shall not, either alone or in conjunction with other factors, afford any 64 basis for the granting of a variance. The fact that the improvements already existing 65 at the time of the application are old, obsolete, outmoded or in disrepair, or the fact 66 that the property is then unimproved, shall not be deemed to make the plight of the 67 property unique or to contribute thereto. 68 69 2.22 Where the board finds the zoning classification of a particular property to be 70 conducive to the deprivation of all reasonable use of the land or building by the owner 71 thereof, and where the board deems the same condition to apply generally to other land 72 or buildings in the same neighborhood or zone, the said board may call this condition 73 to the attention of the planning commission for recommending amendment to the 74 zoning ordinance. 75 76 2.23 In all cases where the board of adjustment grants a variance from the strict 77 application of the requirements of this ordinance, it shall be the duty of such board to 78 attach conditions and safeguards as may be required in order that the result of its 79 action may be as nearly as possible in accordance with the intent and purposes of this 80 ordinance. 81 82 2.24 Whenever the board of adjustment denies an application for variance, such 83 application for variance, or an application on the same property which is substantially 84 similar, shall not be accepted for reconsideration by the board of adjustment sooner 85 than one year from the date of denial. 86 87 The board of adjustment shall have the powers and duties as specified in Delaware Code 88 Annotated (22 Del. C. § 301 et seq.) and as articulated below: 89 90 2.1 Variance – The board shall have the authority to authorize variances from provisions 91 of the zoning ordinance that are not contrary to public interest where the board 92 determines that a literal interpretation of the zoning ordinance would result in undue 93 hardship or exceptional practical difficulties to the applicant. In granting variances, the 94 board shall determine that the spirit of the zoning ordinance is observed and substantial 95 justice done. 96

97 2.11 Area Variance. A variance shall be considered an area variance if it relates to bulk 98 standards, signage regulations, and other provisions of the zoning ordinance that address 99 lot layout, buffers, and dimensions. In considering a request for an area variance, the 100 board shall evaluate the following criteria and document them in their findings of fact: 101 102 (a) the nature of the zone in which the property lies; 103 104 (b) the character of the immediate vicinity and the contained uses therein; 105 106 (c) whether, if the restriction upon the applicant’s property were removed, such 107 removal would seriously affect neighboring properties and uses; and 108 109 (d) whether, if the restriction is not removed, the restriction would create 110 unnecessary hardship or exceptional practical difficulty for the owner in his 111 efforts to make normal improvements in the character of that use of the property 112 that is a permitted use under the provisions of the zoning ordinance. 113 114 2.12 Use Variance. A variance shall be considered a use variance if it would permit a use 115 of the subject property that would otherwise not be permitted on the subject property. In 116 considering a request for a use variance, the board shall determine that the following 117 criteria exist and document them in their findings of fact: 118 119 (a) That there are physical conditions applying to the land or building for which 120 the variance is sought, which conditions are peculiar to such land or building, and 121 have not resulted from any act of the applicant or any predecessor in title; and 122 123 (b) That the aforesaid circumstances or conditions are such that the strict 124 application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of all 125 reasonable use of such land or building and the granting of the variance is 126 necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building, and that the variance as 127 granted by the board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; 128 and 129 130 (c) That the granting of the variance under such conditions as the board may 131 deem necessary or desirable to apply thereto will be in harmony with the general 132 purpose and intent of this ordinance, will not represent a radical departure 133 therefrom, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, will not change the character 134 thereof and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 135 136 2.2 Appeal of administrative order, requirement, decision, or determination – The board shall 137 have the authority to hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is any order, requirement, 138 decision or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement of the zoning 139 ordinance. Appeals to the board may be made by any person aggrieved or by any officer, 140 department, board or bureau of the municipality affected by any decision of an administrative 141 officer. 142 143 Section 3. Procedure. 144 145 The powers and duties of the board of adjustment shall be exercised in accordance with the 146 following procedure:

147 3.1 The board of adjustment shall not decide upon any appeal for interpretation or 148 variance without first holding a public hearing, notice of which hearing and of the substance 149 of the appeal or application shall be given by publication in the official newspaper of the city 150 at least ten days before the date of such hearing. In addition to such published notice, the 151 board of adjustment shall cause notice to be given of the substance of every appeal for a 152 variance, together with notice of the hearing thereon, by causing notices thereof to be mailed 153 by postal card or other means at least ten days before the date of said hearing to the owners 154 of all property abutting that held by the applicant in the immediate area (whether or not 155 involved in such appeal) and all other owners within 200 feet, or such additional distance as 156 the board of adjustment may deem advisable, from the exterior boundaries of the land 157 involved in such appeal, as the names of said owners appear on the last completed 158 assessment roll of the city. Any or all of the notices required by this [sub]section shall be 159 issued by the office of the city clerk city planner on order of the board of adjustment or 160 upon order of the chairperson of said board if the appeal is received when the board is not 161 in session and the chairperson deems it necessary or desirable to expedite the public hearing 162 on such appeal. Provided that due notice shall have been published as above provided and 163 that there shall have been substantial compliance with the remaining provisions of the 164 paragraph [subsection], the failure to give notice in exact conformance herewith shall not 165 be deemed to invalidate action taken by the board of adjustment in connection with the 166 granting of any appeal or variance. 167 168 3.2 If the land involved in an appeal or application lies within 500 feet of the boundary of 169 any other incorporated municipality, the city clerk city planner shall also transmit to the 170 municipal clerk of such other municipality a copy of the official notice of the public hearing 171 thereon not later than the day after such notice appears in the official newspaper of the city. 172 173 3.3 At least ten days before the date of any public hearing, the secretary of the board 174 of adjustment shall transmit to the secretary of the planning commission a copy of any 175 appeal or application, together with a copy of the notice of such hearing. The planning 176 commission may submit to the board of adjustment an advisory opinion on said appeal 177 or application at any time prior to the rendering of a decision.3.4 178 179 3.4 3.3 Unless work is commenced and diligently prosecuted within one year of the date of 180 the granting of a variance, such variance shall become null and void. 181 182 3.5 3.4All appeals and variance applications and appeals made to the board of adjustment 183 shall be in writing, on forms prescribed by the board and approved by the planning 184 commission. All variance requests and appeals from an order, requirement, decision or 185 determination made by an administrative official, board or agency of the city for 186 residential uses shall be accompanied by a fee as provided for in Appendix F--Fees and 187 Fines. All variance requests for nonresidential uses shall be accompanied by a fee as 188 provided for in Appendix F--Fees and Fines. All appeals from an order, requirement, 189 decision or determination made by an administrative official, board or agency of the 190 city shall be accompanied by a fee as provided for in Appendix F--Fees and Fines. The 191 board of adjustment may, in its discretion, return to the applicant part or all of the fee paid 192 by him in the event that his appeal under section 2.2 Appeal of administrative order, 193 requirement, decision, or determination 2.1 (interpretation) hereof is partially or wholly 194 successful. The fees filed in connection with applications under section 2.1 Variance 2.2 195 (variances) shall not be returnable, regardless of disposition of the case by the board. 196

197 3.6 3.5 Each appeal or variance application or appeal shall fully set forth the circumstances 198 of the case. Every appeal or variance application or appeal shall refer to the specific 199 provision of the ordinance involved, and shall exactly set forth, as the case may be, the 200 interpretation that is claimed, the details of the variance that is applied for and the grounds 201 on which it is claimed that the same should be granted. 202 203 3.7 3.6 Every decision of the board of adjustment shall be recorded in accordance with 204 standard forms adopted by the board, and shall fully set forth the circumstances of the case 205 and shall contain a full record of the findings on which the decision is based. Every decision 206 of the board shall be by resolution and each such resolution shall be filed by case number, 207 together with all documents pertaining thereto. The board of adjustment shall notify the 208 city planner, each member of the city council, and the chairperson of the planning 209 commission in Dover, and the municipal clerk of any affected municipality given notice 210 of hearings as set forth in [sub]section 3.2 of its decision in each case. 211 212 3.8 3.7 All the provisions of this ordinance relating to the board of adjustment shall be 213 strictly construed. The board, as a body of limited jurisdiction, shall act in full conformity 214 with all provisions of law and of this ordinance and in strict compliance with all limitations 215 contained therein; provided, however, that if the procedural requirements set forth in this 216 ordinance have been substantially observed, no applicant or appellant shall be deprived of 217 the right of application or appeal. 218 219 3.8 Whenever the board of adjustment denies an application for variance, such application 220 for variance, or an application on the same property which is substantially similar, shall 221 not be accepted for reconsideration by the board of adjustment sooner than one year from 222 the date of denial. 223 224 225 ADOPTED: * 226 227 228 SYNOPSIS 229 The proposed ordinance brings the City’s code provisions governing 230 Board of Adjustment into conformance with State statutes and case 231 law. 232 233 234 Actions History: 235 June 14, 2010 - Introduced in Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee

City of Dover, Delaware FY 2010 -2014 Five Year Consolidated Plan Prepared by: The City of Dover Community Development Office June 28, 2010

2010-2014 CONSOLIDATED PLAN Acknowledgements Mayor: Carleton E. Carey, Sr. City Manager: Anthony J. DePrima, AICP City Council: Kenneth L. Hogan Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee Beverly C. Williams Sophia Russell William P. McGlumphy Eugene B. Ruane Eugene B. Ruane Kenneth L. Hogan Sophia R. Russell David Lewis Reuben Salters Ann Horsey David L. Bonar James G. McGiffin, Jr. Thomas J. Leary The 2010 Consolidated Plan project team: Community Development Staff: Tracey N. Harvey, Community Development Manager City of Dover Planning Staff: Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning & Community Development Dawn Melson Williams, AICP, Principal Planner Michael Albert, AICP, Planner II Jeremy Gibb, GIS Technician Maretta Purnell, Office Assistant II Dover Housing Authority Ami Sebastian Hauer, Executive Director Delaware State Housing Paula Voshell, Management Analysis III Authority Homeless Planning Council Susan Starrett, Executive Director

ii I Summary of the Consolidated Plan Development Process (24 CFR 91 (a)) ........................................ 1 I.1 Lead Agency (24 CFR 91.200(b)) .............................................................................................. 1 I.2 Managing the Process (24 CFR 91.200(b)) ................................................................................ 2 I.3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 2 II Community Description and Citizen Participation (24 CFR 91.200(b) ................................................ 3 II.1 BACKGROUND AND TRENDS (24 CFR 91.200 (a))............................................................. 3 Map II-1a State of Delaware ................................................................................................................................ 3 MAP II-1 City of Dover Census Tracts ............................................................................................................ .4 Demographics (24 CFR 91.200 (a))..................................................................................................................... 6 TABLE II-2a Population Growth ....................................................................................................................... 6 TABLE II-2b Age of Population………………………………………………………………………………...6 TABLE II-2c Age of Profiles in Dover ………………………………………………………………………… 7 TABLE II-2c Racial Composition 2000 ............................................................................................................. 7 TABLE II-2d Median Family Income2000 ........................................................................................................ 8 TABLE II-2e Median Family Income by Race 2005 .......................................................................................... 8 TABLE II-2f Percentage of Persons Living Below the Poverty Line by Race .................................................... 9 II.2 AREAS OF RACIAL, ETHNIC AND LOW INCOME CONCENTRATIONS ...................... 9 Map II-2 Areas of Minority Concentration ....................................................................................................... 10 Map II-3 Low-Moderate Income Concentration 2000 ...................................................................................... 11 II.3 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION .............................................................................................................12 Citizen Participation Plan .................................................................................................................................. 12 II.4 IDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS AND THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS ......................16 III HOUSING , HOMELESS AND SPECIAL NEEDS ASSEESSMENT .............................................17 III.1 GENERAL (24 CFR 91.205 (a)) ..................................................................................................17 TABLE 4A Priority Public Housing Needs-Dover Public Housing Authority ................................................. 18 III.2 CATEGORIES OF PERSONS AFFECTED (24 CFR 91.205 (b) .........................................................19 Very Low-Income (0 to 50% of median family income). .................................................................................. 19 Other Low-Income (51 to 80% of median family income) ................................................................................ 20 Moderate Income (81 to 95% of median family income) .................................................................................. 20 TABLE 2A Priority Needs Summary Table ..................................................................................................... 21 TABLE III B-7 LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN THE CITY OF DOVER ............... 22 TABLE III B-8 ESTIMATED LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN THE CITY OF DOVER EXPERIENCING HOUSING PROBLEMS ....................................................................................... 22 III.3 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ...........................................................................................................23 III.4 HOMELESS FACILITIES (24 CFR 91.215(c)) ...............................................................................23 CITY OF DOVER HOMELESS POPULATION ……………………………………………………………. .24 Homeless prevention activities and Chronic Homelessness …………………………………….. 25 TABLE 1A Emergency Families Shetered ....................................................................................................... 26 III.5 SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITIES AND SERVICES (24 CFR 91.215(d)) ...............................................28 IV HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS (24CFR 91.210) ...........................................................................29 IV.1 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS (A) ...............................................................................................29 IV.2 PUBLIC AND ASSISTED HOUSING (24 CFR 91.210 b) .................................................................30 Table IV B-2 (DHA) PUBLIC OR SUBSIDIZED UNITS BY BEDROOM SIZE ........................................... 30 Table IV B-3 (DSHA)PUBLIC HOUSING UNITS BY BEDROOM SIZE IN THE CITY OF DOVER ......... 31 Table IV B-4 PRIVATE LOW/MOD INCOME HOUSING PROJECTS ........................................................ 31 IV.3 SECTION 8 HOUSING ...................................................................................................................31 Table IV B-5 (DHA) SECTION 8 RENTAL VOUCHERS OFFERED ............................................................. 32 Table IV B-6 (DSHA)SECTION 8 RENTAL VOUCHERS OFFERED........................................................... 32 IV.4 BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING……………………………………………........33 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS .................................................................................................................... 35

iii V STRATEGIC PLAN (24 CFR 91.25) ...................................................................................................41 V.1 GENERAL (A) .............................................................................................................................42 TABLE V – 1 PRIORITY RANKING RESULTS ............................................................................................ 42 V.2 STRATEGY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING (24 CFR 91.215 (b))....................................................42 PROVIDE DECENT HOUSING. .........................................................................................................42 GOAL AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................42 V.3 BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING (24 CFR 91.215(e)) ...........................................43 V.4 INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE.............................................................................................43 CURRENT INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE .......................................................................................................43 ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS ............................................................................................................45 AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING............................................................................................45 V.5 PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................................................45 PUBLIC HOUSING RESIDENT INITIATIVES .................................................................................45 V.6 LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUCTION ....................................................................46 V.7 ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY ................................................................................................46 VI Action Plan ............................................................................................................................................49 VI.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................50 VI.2 Application for Federal Assistance ............................................................................................50 VI.3 Background................................................................................................................................51 VI.4 Resources (24 CFR 91.220 (b)) .................................................................................................52 FEDERAL PROGRAMS (24 CFR 91.220 (b)(1)) ............................................................................................ 53 NON-FEDERAL PUBLIC PROGRAMS(24 CFR 91.220 (b)(2)) ................................................................... 53 1. STATE PROGRAMS .............................................................................................................................53 2. LOCAL PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................................53 3. PRIVATE RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................54 VI.5 ACTION PLAN GOALS ..........................................................................................................55 VI.6 ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN .....................................................................................56 PROJECT 1 HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ...............................................................................56 PROJECT 2 HOMEOWNER REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE PROGAM .............................................................56 PROJECT 3 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................56 PROJECT 4 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY .........................................................................................................56 PROJECT 5 CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY SUPPORT PROGRAM .....................................................................56 PROJECT 6 FIRST STATE RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL .....................................56 PROJECT 7 COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................56 VI.7 MAPS OF DOVER ........................................................................................................................58 MAP II-1 CITY OF DOVER CENSUS TRACTS AND BLOCK GROUPS ..............................................................59 MAP II - 2 CITY OF DOVER AREAS OF MINORITY CONCENTRATION ..........................................................60 MAP II - 3 CITY OF DOVER LOW TO MODERATE INCOME AREAS ...............................................................61 VI.8 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION: ...........................................................................................62 VI.9 SERVICE DELIVERY AND MANAGEMENT: .....................................................................62 VI.10 HOMELESS AND OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS ACTIVITIES: ...............................................63 VI.11 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION .............................................................................................64 VII. SUMMARY OF CITIZEN COMMENTS ..........................................................................................65 VII.1 General Certifications ............................................................................................................66 VII.2 Specific CDBG Certifications ...............................................................................................70 VII.3 APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS ....................................................................................72 VIII Definitions ...........................................................................................................................................74 IX Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................77 IX.1 General Procedures ....................................................................................................................77

1 City of Dover, Delaware Community Development Office Consolidated Plan (2010-2014) I SUMMARY OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS (24 CFR 91 (a)) The Consolidated Plan for the City of Dover serves as the primary planning document for identifying and meeting the housing and community development needs for the low and moderate-income residents of Dover. Created through Title I of the National Affordable Housing Act, the Consolidated Plan also serves as a requirement for the receipt of federal funds allocated annually to each reporting jurisdiction. The Consolidated Plan replaced two previously required planning documents, the Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) and the Comprehensive Homeless Assistance Plan (CHAP). The Consolidated Plan approach is also the means to meet the application requirements for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) formula programs. This process replaces prior CPD planning and application requirements with a single document, and satisfies the submission requirements of the four CPD formula programs for local jurisdictions. The City of Dover’s Consolidated Plan development process consisted of the following steps: 1. Identification of Stakeholders. 2. Conduct workshop to develop needs of the community. 3. Conduct workshop with Stakeholders to rank priorities. 4. Conduct first public hearing with results of priorities from workshops. 5. CDBG Advisory Committee meeting for review and recommendations. 6. Unveil Draft Consolidated Plan for 30-day review period. 7. Prepare final City of Dover 2010 Consolidated Plan. 8. Submit final plan to City Council for approval. 9. Submit City of Dover 2010 Consolidated Plan to HUD. I.1 LEAD AGENCY (24 CFR 91.200(b)) The City of Dover is a major City in the state in population, area and employment. A popularly elected nine-member City Council and full-time Mayor represent Dover’s population. All elected officials serve two-year terms with four Council members elected each year and the At-large member elected every other year. Council appoints a City Manager that oversees most of the day-to-day operations of the City including water, sewer, trash, streets and electric service. The Council also appoints other key department

2 heads such as the City Planner, Building Inspector, City Engineer, Controller/Treasurer, Fire Marshal, Tax Assessor, and the City Clerk. The Police Department is under the Mayor’s Office. The City privately contracts Emergency Medical Services and the Fire Department is volunteer. The Community Development Office is a part of the Department of Planning in the Public Services Department. The Community Development Office has one full time employee, the Manager, who administers the CDBG Grant and is the Fair Housing Coordinator. Clerical, planning and inspection assistance is provided by the Planning and Inspections Department. The Building Inspections Office also provides housing and life safety inspections throughout the City including property maintenance. The Dover Housing Authority provides responsibility for the public housing needs within the City and is a separate entity from the City. The Delaware State Housing Authority who operates both Section 8 vouchers and public housing units also caters to the housing needs of low-moderate income families. I.2 Managing the Process (24 CFR 91.200 (b) Development of the Consolidated Plan has involved months of effort and coordination by the Manager of the Community Development Office. Stakeholders assembled included members of the community, elected and appointed officials, private citizens, community groups, housing authorities, various county and state agencies within the City of Dover to consult on topics regarding homelessness, persons with disabilities, elderly, persons with HIV/AIDS, and services for children. After the Stakeholders were assembled and their input solicited, work began by updating all of the information into the Consolidated Plan. The result is formulated in the goals developed to address the needs of the City. The following is a list of stakeholders who participated in the planning process of the Consolidated Plan. • Homeless Planning Council • Delaware State Housing Authority • Dover Housing Authority • City of Dover Planning Department • House of Pride • State of Delaware Department of Health and Social Services • Delaware HIV Consortium • State of Delaware Division of Family Services • City of Dover City Manager’s Office I.3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Consolidated Plan (2010-2014) is a five-year plan mandated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This plan identifies the specific needs concerning affordable housing, homeownership, housing rehabilitation, and community development such as: infrastructure, economic development and public service needs. The Strategic Plan element of this plan specifies the goals identified in the preparation of this plan and includes the five goals that the Consolidated Plan revolves around. These goals in order of priority are:

3 1. Provide aid to special needs persons 2. Preserve the existing housing stock in the City of Dover 3. Encourage owner occupied housing in low to moderate income areas 4. Provide safe and livable neighborhoods 5. Aid economic opportunity in low to moderate income areas The Action Plan Component of the Plan specifies how the projects will further these goals for Fiscal Year 2010. II Community Description and Citizen Participation (24 CFR 91.200 (b)) II.1 Background and Trends (24 CFR 91.200 (a) Dover, the Capital of Delaware, is centrally located in the state and is part of the Mid- Atlantic region. The City is located approximately 90 miles from both Philadelphia and Washington, D.C. Dover’s population ranks second only to Wilmington, Delaware. Delaware and the Eastern Shore counties of Maryland and Virginia comprise the Delmarva Peninsula. Dover is also the largest city in land area on the peninsula with a total land area of over 23 square miles. Map II-1 shows the census tracts within the corporate limits, while Map II-1a reflects the regional influence. Map II-1a State of Delaware Dover has experienced a rapid rise in population over the previous decade. The population increased from 1990 to 2000 by 16.3%. Dover’s population has continued to grow since 2000. The City’s current population is estimated at 36,627 according to Delaware Population Consortium 2009 Report. The 2010 Census data will provide new population counts for comparison once the reports have been released. Dover’s daytime population, estimated to be greater than 80,000, further galvanized its central role in the

4 region. The Delaware Population Consortium 2009 population projections continue to indicate growth in the City’s population through 2030. Dover’s historic role as central to Kent County has continued for well over three centuries since it was originally laid out by William Penn in 1683 to serve as St. Jones County Seat. The original grid pattern still exists in the historic downtown area surrounding The Green, laid out in 1717, and Capitol Complex, which serves as both the County Seat and the Capitol of the State. This central part of the City now serves as one of the employment centers with a large concentration of professional and government offices. Merely blocks away, the commercial center of the Downtown along the axis of Loockerman Street has begun to revitalize with incentives associated with the Main Street designation. The commercial center is not very deep with the beginnings of lower to moderate income housing demands from the mid 19th – mid 20th centuries becoming the norm. The City’s center is a diverse area with income levels varying from street to street within block groups and census tracts. Low-moderate income areas near the center of the City may even be as close as directly across the street from moderate-upper income levels. This makes it very difficult to target areas by Census tract or block group. The City has undertaken individual surveys to designate areas as target blocks. Map II-I, references those tracts which qualify as low to moderate income areas. To the east of the central portion of the City is the Route 13 and Bay Road corridors to which the retail center for the entire region moved beginning in the 1950’s and continues today. Major business and employment centers have shifted to this corridor with the largest employers in the retail, service, and commercial recreation areas being along these corridors. These include the Dover Mall; big box retailers including Wal-Mart, Lowe’s, Sam’s Club, K-Mart and many other retail chains; and Dover Downs Hotel & Casino and Dover International Speedway (Home to two NASCAR races annually, harness racing and a casino). Three of Dover’s four institutions of higher learning Delaware Technical and Community College, Delaware State University and Wilmington University are located along this corridor.

5 Residential development over the past five years has been characterized by a few large scale mixed-use subdivisions, traditional subdivisions, and the addition of four major privatized student housing complexes. Residential development has not kept pace with the growing commercial sector due to lower development cost beyond City limits. The majority of new residential construction has occurred in the suburban areas of west Dover, expanding into agricultural and woodland areas. Detached single-family homes have remained the dominant housing type, representing 41% off all housing since 2003. However, over the period of 2003-2007, increasing numbers of townhouses, duplexes and multi-family dwellings have been constructed with multi-family units growing at the highest rate of 46%. Constructions continued in the mixed housing neighborhoods of Village of Cannon Mills, and Village of Westover with build-out of Phases V and VI. New conventional single family detached housing subdivisions approved and under construction include Nottingham Meadows (212 units), Emerald Point (107 units), Maple Glen (34 units), Four Seasons (43 units), and Farthing Woods (17 units). Mixed unit subdivisions still under construction include Clearview Meadows Planned Neighborhood Design (PND), Lexington Glen PND, Patriot Village PND, and Eden Hill Farms Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND). The eastern section makes up a part of the City that begins with the Route 13 corridor and moves eastward toward the Delaware Bay. These neighborhoods consist of mostly single family neighborhoods constructed during the housing boom of the last half of the 20th century. This area is also sprinkled with some higher density residential developments including a mixture of townhouses and multifamily dwellings. The new developments include Lexington Glen PND, Patriot Village PND, Clearview Meadows PND and Blue Hen Apartments. This area is home to the largest concentration of multiple family units in the City. This broad area includes existing development such as Baytree, The Laurels, Manchester Square and higher end residential uses just west of Route 13 such as the neo- traditional development of Overlook and the Silver Mill apartment building. The southern section of the City is an area dominated by single family residences and professional offices. Also included in this area is Bayhealth Medical Center (Kent General Hospital). The Dover Air Force Base dominates the southeast section of the City. The southwest area of the City include the new developments of Nottingham Meadows (single family homes) and the Eden Hill Farms Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) which includes a residential area of townhouses and a professional office building with a walk-in emergency clinic. The third and final section of the City is the western half, which can roughly be described as the area west of the Norfolk and Southern Rail Line to the corporate limits. This area is home to the industrial base of the City including Kraft Foods, Playtex Apparel and Proctor and Gamble. Public and private interests groups are involved in projects on Dover’s West Side thus beginning the implementation of the Strategic Plan for that area (Strategic Development Plan for the West Side, August 2000). Other large employers on this side of town are mostly located in the industrial parks of West Dover. Residential developments in this section of the City include Village of Cannon Mill PND, Village of Westover PND, Emerald Point, and Farthing Woods.

6 Demographics (24 CFR 91.200 (a)) According to the 2000 Census the total population of Dover was 32,043. This represents a 16% increase from the official 1990 Census figures from 27,529. Of that population a total of 4,017 people resided in group quarters, the vast majority of these people resided in Dormitories associated with Delaware State University and Wesley College, and the barracks of Dover Air Force Base. The remaining 28,026 persons occupied the 12,340 households in the City. The average size of a household in 2000 was 2.5 persons. Revised estimates furnished by the United States Census Bureau in 2000 are reflected in the following table. The 2000-2020 population projections, furnished by the Delaware Population Consortium, show continued growth at a stable rate. These projections are estimates based on the 2000 Census numbers and when making projections that far out the numbers are generally lower than will be reflected in the 2010 decennial Census. TABLE II-2a Population Growth Year Population increase % Growth Source of Data 2000 32,043 4,606 16% US Census Bureau 2008 36,359 4,316 14% Delaware Population Consortium (projection) 2010 37,479 1,120 2.9% Delaware Population Consortium (projection) 2015 38,053 574 1.5% Delaware Population Consortium (projection) 2020 38,635 582 1.5% Delaware Population Consortium (projection) Source: Delaware Population Consortium 2008 Report Age Distribution In addition to growth, it is useful to consider the future population’s age distribution. This information (such as the number of school age children, elderly, or size of labor force) facilities appropriate infrastructure planning. The 2008 Delaware Population Consortium Report revealed that Dover will have a relatively stable proportion of people in age groups 0-64 from 2008 and 2020. This can perhaps be attributed to the influence of major institutions located in Dover including Dover Air Force Base, Wesley College and Delaware State University. Table II-2b shows the age distribution of Dover’s population as estimated. There will also be a high proportion of senior adults (65 and older) residing within the City. This can be attributed to the growth of institutional and retirement communities in Dover. TABLE II-2b Age of Population For Dover Year Population 0- 64 > 65 % of Population 2000 32,200 26,444 4,318 13 2005 34,025 29,449 4,576 13 2010 37,387 32,175 5,211 13 2015 38,163 32,354 5,809 15 2020 38,956 32,512 6,443 16 Source: Delaware Population Consortium 2009 Report

7 Predicting population demographics is critical to infrastructure planning. The historical trend that are evidenced by comparing the 1990 and 2000 US Census combined with the yearly projections from the Delaware Population Consortium provide a foundation for estimation. Table II-2c depicts population trends in the various age groups. This information assists in planning for facilities, housing and other activities. Table II-2c Age Profiles in Dover, by Percent 2008 2010 2015 2020 Age People Percentage People Percentage People Percentage People Percentage Group of of of of population increase population increase population increase population Increase 0-19 10,154 28% 8% 10,322 28% 2% 10,254 27% -0.6% 10,520 27% 3% 20-24 3,906 11% 17% 4,037 11% 3% 3,948 10% -2% 3,676 10% -7% 25-44 8,946 25% -0.1% 8,991 24% 0.5% 9,024 24% 0.3% 9,233 24% 2% 45-64 8,353 23% 25% 8,903 24% 6% 9,035 24% 2% 8,815 23% -3% 65+ 4,999 14% 14% 5,224 14% 4% 5,792 15% 10% 6,390 17% 9% 36,359 11% 37,479 3% 38,053 2% 38,635 2% Source: Delaware Population Consortium 2008 Report The upcoming 2010 Census will report if this trend is continuing. TABLE II-2c Racial Composition 2000 Native American Hawaiian Hispanic Black or Indian and and Some Two or or Latino Geographic Total African Alaska Other Other More (of any Area Population White American Native Asian Pacific Race Races race) Islander State of Delaware 783,600 584,773 150,666 2,731 16,259 283 15,855 13,033 37,277 City of Dover 32,135 17,655 11,961 146 1,016 12 503 842 1,327 Kent County 126,697 93,106 26,180 806 461 50 1,611 2,807 4,069 Totals 852,098 629,198 169,830 3,063 17,769 332 16,987 17,736 40,158 Source: 2000 US Census For the purpose of the Census, a household is a group of individuals occupying a housing unit. A household may either be a family unit (individuals related by blood or marriage)

8 or a non-family unit (individuals living together but not related). This is the basic unit above individuals the Census tracks for the purpose of tracking income. The decennial Census relies on this unit of measurement to determine poverty status. The 2000 Census average household income in the City of Dover was $38,669. The State of Delaware’s average was $47,381. The following table (Table II-2d) compares Dover’s median family income to other local political subdivisions. TABLE II-2d Median Family Income 2000 City of Dover Kent County State of Delaware Median $38,669 $40,950 $47,381 Household Income Median Non- $25,909 $28,683 $23,305 Family Household Income Median Family $48,338 $46,504 $40,252 Household Income Source: 2000 US Census By combing the two previous tables one can see that the income characteristics by race of householder are disproportionate. This trend is not unique to Dover as can be seen in Table II-2e; it is apparent throughout the region. In general, white households tend to be more affluent than African American households. One other trend apparent is that there is a concentration of poor African American households within the City limits, greater than the surrounding county or throughout the state. The income level for both white and African American households in the City is substantially lower than the rest of the state. The African American households within the City also have a significantly lower income than their counterparts in Kent County. This indicates that there is a large concentration of the poorest African Americans in Kent County, within the corporate limits of the City. TABLE II-2e Median Family Income by Race 2005 City of Dover Kent County State of Delaware White $42,937 $50,722 $55,427 African $30,138 $35,888 $40,553 American Asian $36,406 $48,370 $76,149 Hispanic or $29,453 $31,554 $43,547 Latino Other $26,607 $58,054 $44,466 Two or More $38,232 $43,227 $50,155 Races Source: American Community Survey 2005

9 The next area of interest when looking at the demographic makeup of the City deals with those persons living under the poverty level of 13.8%. Table II-2f demonstrates the poverty level for different ethnic groups living in Dover, as compared to the rest of the County and State. TABLE II-2f Percentage of Persons Living Below the Poverty Line by Race City of Dover Kent County State of Delaware Persons below 13.8% 10.7% 9.2% Poverty Level, Total White 6.7% 7.9% 6.3% Black or 23.0% 19.6% 18.6% African American American 35.9% 18.5% 15.5% Indian & Alaska Native Asian 17.6% 13.1% 8.8% Native 0% 37.0% 5.3% Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander Some Other 43.0% 23.4% 23.7% Race Two or More 13.8% 12.6% 15.5% Races Hispanic or 19.8% 14.9% 22.3% Latino Source: 2000 U.S. Census of Population & Housing In conclusion it can be said that the demographic makeup of the City is diverse. The fact that none of the large census tracts that lie within the City of Dover show concentrations of low-moderate incomes does not mean that large areas of low-moderate persons do not exist. It is a dynamic of Dover’s diversity that more affluent residents live within blocks if not merely separated by an alley of low-moderate income areas. To accurately establish the concentrations specific studies of individual blocks must be made. II.2 AREAS OF RACIAL, ETHNIC AND LOW INCOME CONCENTRATIONS Dover, Delaware’s the largest municipality in land area, is a very diverse City. The community consists of many different neighborhoods with many cultures immediately adjacent to each other. In Dover, neighborhoods of affluent predominantly white residents, border neighborhoods of ethnic diversity with only an alley separating them. The relative large land size of the City combined with the relatively low population,

10 estimated at 36,627, gives Dover its relatively lower density, when compared to other cities of similar population. The highest densities are mostly found in the traditional downtown area of Central Dover. Dover’s periphery is dominated by low-density suburban type single-family neighborhoods. Due to these historical development patterns, areas of racial, ethnic, and low-income concentrations are dispersed throughout the community. The Census Bureau defines an area of “Concentration” as a neighborhood or development in which more than thirty (30%) percent of the population has a common race, ethnicity or income. Map II-2 shows the minority concentrations by census tract within the City. MAP II-2 AREAS OF MINORITY CONCENTRATION The largest minority group in Dover is the African-American community. This community is located in two major areas. The first area is the historically African American settlement area. These areas were originally laid out and developed by African Americans, included in this category are Lincoln Park, Northwest Dover Heights, The College Settlement on State College Road and the western edges of Central Dover. The second area is dominated by the public housing developments and subsidized private developments, which have attracted a large number of minority residents. Included in this category are Capital Green, Whatcoat Apartments, Simon Circle, and Manchester Square.

11 In the City of Dover, HUD has designated those Census Block groups, which have greater than a 51% concentration of low-moderate income persons. This is graphically represented in Map II-3 below. The areas within City limits are limited to Block Group 408-01, 413-01, 412-01 and 410-02. MAP II-3 LOW-MODERATE INCOME CONCENTRATION 2000

12 II.3 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The public participation events planned for the Consolidated Plan (2010-2014) represent the culmination of decades of experience in conducting similar events. In addition to the normal advertising of meetings in the local press, the staff notified stakeholders in writing and by the internet. The public was also notified of all meetings and hearings. The following section summarizes each of the Citizen Participation components of the Consolidated Plan. Citizen Participation Plan A. Purpose The City of Dover’s Consolidated Plan Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) has been prepared by the City of Dover in accordance with the requirements contained in Part 9115 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The CPP outlines the various methods the City of Dover will use to inform its citizens of, and actively involve them in, developing the Consolidated Plan. The Consolidated Plan serves as the housing and community development planning document of the City and its application for funding under the current Community Planning and Development (CDP) formula grant program (CDBG). B. Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee (PR&CE) In order to assure citizen participation and involvement in the Consolidated and Action Plan process, the Community Development Department reports to PR &CE Committee which: 1. Is composed of 3 members of City Council and two (2) private citizens. 2. Provides updates on grant funded projects during monthly meetings. 3. Provides the opportunity to review and comment upon all aspects of the Consolidated Plan process including: a. Providing input on housing and community development needs and priorities; b. Recommending funding activities; c. Participating in making amendments to the Consolidated Plan;

13 C. Timely Access to Meetings and Information All citizens, particularly low and moderate income persons, shall be provided with reasonable and timely access to local meeting information and records relating to both the proposed use of funds and their actual use in the Consolidated Plan. Such information shall include but not be limited to: 1. Pertinent mailings relating to the Consolidated Plan; 2. Notice of and records of public hearings; 3. Key program documents, including prior applications, letters of approval, contracts, status reports, audit reports, and proposed applications; 4. Copies of program regulations; 5. Documents on other program requirements such as contracting procedures, environmental/historic preservation policies, fair housing and equal opportunity requirements, and acquisition and relocation provisions. D. Technical Assistance Technical assistance is provided to groups and representatives of persons of low and moderate income that request assistance in developing proposals for funding under any of the programs covered by the Consolidated Plan. The level and type of technical assistance to be provided will be determined by the City and will include those training activities necessary to increase the ability of low and moderate income persons to be involved effectively in the development, planning and design of the program proposals. E. Public Hearings Be held at times and locations convenient to potential and actual beneficiaries and with accommodations for persons with disabilities. To the maximum extent possible, all public hearings shall be held in the evening hours after 5:00 PM. All public hearing sites must be accessible to ramps or elevators and be convenient to parking or public transportation. Two public hearings are required. Adequate notice is given through advertisement in the City’s local newspaper, the Delaware State News and copies of the notices are sent to such service agencies and public housing administration offices who serve and advocate for the low and very low income persons and disability communities to encourage citizens participation input by the citizens and their advocates, meet the needs of citizens and particularly those who are beneficiaries of the programs covered in the Consolidated Plan.

14 A minimum of two public hearings are held. The first public hearing the City will make available to citizens, public agencies and other interested parties information that includes the amount of the Entitlement Grant and a list of sub- recipient grant requests including the amount that will benefit persons of low and moderate income. The draft plan will be made available for thirty days in the City Hall Planning Department at 15 E. Loockerman Street, the Dover Public Library at 45 S. State Street and on the City’s website. The plan will also be accessible to persons with disabilities. The City will consider any comments or views of citizens received in writing or orally at the public hearing. A summary of these comments or views and summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons therefore, shall be attached to the plan. Any amendments to the plan will be advertised in the local newspaper and sent to Social Service Agencies and Public Housing Officials. The City will provide a thirty-day period to receive comments on the substantial amendment before the amendment is implemented. The same procedure will be followed as explained above. Performance Reports The Citizen Plan will provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on the Performance Report for the City in which the Department of Housing and Urban Development distributes annually. A fifteen-day period will be set aside for comments. The City will consider any comments or views of citizens received in writing or orally at public hearings in preparing the Performance Report. A summary of these comments or views shall be attached to the Performance Report. F. Response to Comments The City will consider any comments or views of citizens or units of local government received in writing, or orally at public hearings, meetings, etc., in preparing the City’s final Consolidated Plan and Performance Report. The City must provide a timely written response to written complaints and grievances within 15 working days. The written response must document the reasons for whatever action was taken. A summary of these comments and responses shall be attached to the final Consolidated Plan amendment of the plan or Performance Report. G. Criteria for Amendments to Consolidated Plan The City will publish the proposed amendment in the public notice section of a local newspaper. Comments will be requested for a thirty-day period, after

15 which time, the City will consider any comments received and, if appropriate, modify the proposed actions. A summary of these comments shall be attached to the amendment submitted to HUD. Amendments to the Consolidated Plan The following criteria will be used in determining what actions will constitute a substantive change in the City’s planned or actual activities under the Consolidated Plan, and which will require an amendment to the plan. ● Changes in Allocation Amounts: Any significant change in the allocation of funds under a specific program or activity defined under the Consolidated Plan shall require the City to prepare and pass an amendment to the Consolidated Plan. In the case of changes to specific allocations, significant change will be defined as any change in the allocation of funds under a specific program or activity which is greater than 20% of the total funds allocated to that program or activity. Any change that involves 10% or more of the total allocation (entitlement plus program income) in any given grant year, will also be considered a significant change. ● Changes in the Method of Distribution of Funds: Any significant change in an established method for the distribution of funds defined within the Consolidated Plan for a specific program or activity, will require that the City prepare and pass an amendment to the Consolidated Plan. Significant in this case will imply that a method(s) for the distribution of funds for the program or activity was defined within the Consolidated Plan, and the City subsequently changed this method of distribution (i.e. if the City decided to distribute funds for a program through a process of soliciting proposals through a Request For Proposals, and then decided instead to distribute the funds for the program or activity through a negotiated contract.) The second criteria, which must also be met for a change in method of distribution to be considered significant, will be when the funds in question are greater than 20% of the total CPS funding allocated to that program or activity. ● Using Consolidation Plan Funds for Activities not described in the Consolidated Plan: If the City proposes to use funds from any program covered by the Consolidated Plan (including program income) to carry out an activity not previously described in the Action Plan, the City will be required to prepare and request an amendment to the Consolidated Plan. ● Changes in the Location of an Activity: If the City significantly changes the location of an activity, the City will be required to prepare and request an amendment to the Consolidated Plan. Changes in the location of an

16 activity shall be considered significant if the City had specifically defined a location for an activity within the Consolidated Plan and subsequently decides to choose an alternative site for the location of that activity and thereby shifts the target benefit of that activity to a new area. ● Changes in the Beneficiaries of an Activity: If the City decides to significantly change the established beneficiaries of a specific activity (a defined “target group”) defined in the Consolidated Plan, than the City will be required to prepare and pass an amendment to the Consolidated Plan. In the case of a change in beneficiaries of an activity, significant shall mean that the estimated number of individuals of the targeted group who will be benefited will change more than 10% of the total number of individuals in that group originally estimated. If an activity benefit is changed from one national objective to another, the City will not request an amendment unless other amendment thresholds are met. H. Consolidated Plan Adoption The draft Consolidated Plan will be made available to the public per notice in the Delaware State News, the City’s website and copies available at City Hall and the Library. Comments received will be considered prior to its adoption. The Consolidated Plan will be considered adopted once approved by City Council. Upon adoption, another notice will be placed in the Delaware State News stating that the Consolidated Plan has been adopted and is on file and available from the City of Dover. II.4 IDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS AND THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS The Community Development Department identified the major Stakeholders. The identification of these groups ranged from the City Manager, the Planning and Community Development Director, the Director of the Homeless Planning Council, the Executive Director of the House of Pride and their clients, a representative from the Delaware State Housing Authority, a member of City Council and private citizens. In the planning process of the Consolidated Plan, the City conducted two goal setting workshops to determine the needs of the community. Meetings were held by staff on November 19, 2009 and January 7, 2010. The stakeholders listed above participated and prioritized the needs of the community. Detailed results of the goal setting workshops are exhibited in the Strategic Plan on page 42.

17 III HOUSING, HOMELESS AND SPECIAL NEEDS ASSEESSMENT Tables 4A and 4B list the housing needs of families that are on the waiting list for subsidized housing based on income, racial composition and the elderly for Dover Housing Authority. III.1 GENERAL (24 CFR 91.205 (a)) Table 4A Dover Housing Authority Housing Needs of Families on the Section 8 Waiting List # of Families % of total families Waiting list total 657 Extremely low income <=30% 466 71% AMI Very low income >30% but <=50% 158 24% AMI Low income >50% but <=80% 32 5% Families with children 483 74% Elderly families 28 4% Families with Disabilities 19 3% Race/ethnicity White 100 15% Race/ethnicity Black 542 83% Race/ethnicity American Indian 6 <1% Race/ethnicity Asian 7 1% Race/ethnicity Pacific Islander 0 0 Race/ethnicity Latino 2 <1% Characteristics by Bedroom Size 1BR 150 2BR 195 3BR 119 4BR 50 5BR 8 5+BR 0 Source : Dover Housing Authority 2010

18 Table 4B Dover Housing Authority Housing Needs of Families on the Public Housing Waiting List # of Families % of total families Waiting list total 471 Extremely low income <=30% 362 79% AMI Very low income >30% but <=50% 88 19% AMI Low income >50% but <=80% 19 4% Families with children 286 61% Elderly families 30 6% Families with Disabilities 22 5% Race/ethnicity White 96 20% Race/ethnicity Black 364 77% Race/ethnicity American Indian 0 0 Race/ethnicity Asian 5 1% Race/ethnicity Pacific Islander 0 0 Race/ethnicity Latino 6 1% Source: Dover Housing Authority 2010 Note: Characteristics by Bedroom Size given for Section 8 only. Dover Housing Authority Strategy for Addressing Needs ● Employ effective maintenance and management policies to minimize the number of public housing units off-line. ● Reduce turnover time for vacated public housing units. ● Maintain or increase Section 8 lease-up rates by establishing payment standards that will enable families to rent throughout the jurisdiction. ● Undertake measures to ensure access to affordable housing among families assisted by the Public Housing Authority, regardless of unit size required.

19 ● Maintain or increase Section 8 lease-up rates by marketing the program to owners, particularly those outside of areas of minority and poverty concentration. ● Maintain or increase Section 8 lease-up rates by effectively screening Section 8 applicants to increase owner acceptance of program. III.2 CATEGORIES OF PERSONS AFFECTED (24 CFR 91.205 (b)) Very Low-Income (0 to 30% of Median Family Income). According to the 2000 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, which is data used by local governments for housing planning, there are 2,212 households in the very low-income category that are renting housing in the City. Of those a very high percentage (67.5%) has indicated that they have a housing problem. Those problems could range from substandard conditions to overcrowding. A high percentage (65%) pay greater than 30% of their income toward rent and smaller, but still significant, percentage (54.2%) pay greater than 50% of their income toward rent. A high percentage (53.1%) of very-low income households is elderly which further limits their housing options. The Dover Housing Authority has 1128 families on its waiting list for public housing and Section 8 assistance. Of those, 828 are very low income. The waiting list is currently open for public housing but closed for Section 8. In terms of owner-occupants, there are 684 households in the very-low income category. Of those, a very high percentage (69.3%) indicates that they have a housing problem. A high percentage (67.2%) pay greater than 30% of their income for housing and a significant percentage (55%) pay more than 50% of their income for housing. The percentage of other very-low income owner-occupant households that have housing problems or suffer from a housing cost burden is 66.7% Low Income (31 to 50% of the Median Family Income) According to the 2000 CHAS data, there are 1,047 in the low income category that are renting in the City of Dover. Of those, (68.1%) has indicated that they have a housing problem. A high percentage of 65.2% also indicates that they are paying greater than 30% of their income towards rent. The number paying greater than 50% is (28.3%). The percentage of other low income renters that have housing problems or suffer from a cost burden is very high at (83.9%). There are 1,480 households in the low income category that own their own homes. Of those, (64.7%) are experiencing having a housing problem, and (62.6%) are paying greater than 30% of their income for housing. The number paying greater than 50% of their income for housing is (32.7%). The percentage of other low owner–occupants that have housing problems or suffer from a housing cost burden is (87.5%).

20 Other Low-income (51 to 80% of median family income) According to the 2000 CHAS Data Book there are 1,192 households in the other low- income category that are renting housing in the City. Of those a very high percentage (52%) has indicated that they have a housing problem. A high percentage (48.3%) also indicates that they are paying greater than 30% of their income towards rent. The number paying greater than 50% of their income for housing is relatively insignificant. The percentage of other low-income renters that have housing problems or suffer from a housing cost burden is 57.9%. There are 197 households in the other low-income category that own their homes. Of those, 13.9% indicate having either a housing problem or paying greater than 30% of their income for housing. The number paying greater than 50% of their income for housing is relatively insignificant. Moderate Income (81 to 95% of median family income) According to the 2000 CHAS Data Book data there are 2,435 households in the moderate-income category that are renting housing in the City of Dover. Of these households, only 9.7% indicate having a housing problem and only 5.8% are paying more than 30% of their income toward rent. The number paying greater than 50% of their income for housing is relatively insignificant. The percentage of other moderate-income renters that have housing problems or suffer from a housing cost burden is 40.1%. There are only 4,953 households in the moderate-income category that own their homes. Of those, only 9.7% indicate having either a housing problem or paying greater than 30% of their income for housing. The number paying greater than 50% of their income for housing are experiencing housing problems.

21 The following three tables summarize this information: TABLE 2A PRIORITY NEEDS SUMMARY TABLE PRIORITY Priority Need HOUSING NEEDS Level Unmet (households) High, Medium, Low Need 0-30% Medium 934 Small Related 31-50% Medium 464 51-80% Low 431 0-30% Low 113 Large Related 31-50% Low 59 51-80% Low 104 Renter 0-30% Low 456 Elderly 31-50% Medium 243 51-80% Low 168 0-30% Medium 709 All Other 31-50% Low 393 51-80% Medium 489 0-30% High 684 Owner 31-50% Medium 251 51-80% Low 839 Special Populations 0-80% N/A Source: 2000 CHAS Data

22 Table III B-7 LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN THE CITY OF DOVER Total Number of Households in Income Category Very Low Income Renters (0%-30% MFI) 2212 Very Low Income Owners (0%-30%MFI) 684 Low Income Renters (31%-50% MFI) 1047 Low Income Owners (31%-50% MFI) 433 Other Low Income Renters (51%-80% MFI) 316 Other Low Income Owners (51%-80% MFI) 64 Moderate Income Renters (81%-95% MFI) 2435 Moderate Income Owners (81%-95% MFI) 4953 Total Low and Moderate Income Households / Total Households 10664/13180 Low/Mod Income Households as a % of Total Households 42% Source: 2000 CHAS Data Table III B-8 PERCENT OF OTHER LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN THE CITY OF DOVER EXPERIENCING HOUSING PROBLEMS Percent of Other Household Income Category Experiencing Housing Problems 73% Very Low Income Renters (0%-30% MFI) 66.7% Very Low Income Owners (0%-30%MFI) Low Income Renters (31%-50% MFI) 83.9% 87.5% Low Income Owners (31%-50% MFI) 57.9% Other Low Income Renters (51%-80% MFI) 72.6% Other Low Income Owners (51%-80% MFI) 5.6% Moderate Income Renters (81%-95% MFI) 13.9% Moderate Income Owners (81%-95% MFI) Source: 2000 CHAS Data The categories listed below give descriptions of the facilities and agencies that service low income and special needs persons.

23 III.3 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY Habitat for Humanity is a national organization that provides home ownership opportunities to low-income families through a no-interest long-term mortgage. Homes are sold on a no profit basis to families who are required to take part in a “sweat-equity” program. The Central Delaware Habitat for Humanity has completed the build of its 14th home in the City of Dover. Their goal is to complete an additional 3 homes in 2010 in the City of Dover. III.4 HOMELESS FACILITIES (24 CFR 91.215 (c)) Salvation Army - This organization carries out crisis alleviation through the administration of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) shelter, utilities, rent and mortgage assistance programs. It also coordinates and refers people to shelters, motels, and local service providers. Its youth activities included: the After School Achievement Program (ASAP), summer camp, Alternative School, Christmas toy and food donations. The adult programs include: nursing home and prison visitation, daily hot meal program, home league mothers support, GED education and basketball leagues. Eight-O-One Life Encompassing Living Program - This program houses adolescents ages 10-18 years old in a crisis situation for a thirty-day period. It also provides diagnostic treatment services to adolescents and AFDC recipients who have been determined to be "at risk" for being abused and neglected. This facility has 12 beds. Shepherd Place, Inc. - This agency operates a relief shelter for homeless women and children only. It provides emergency food baskets, information and referral services, and transportation for in house clients. The services are available on a 24-hour basis, the average stay at the shelter is 2-3 weeks, but does not exceed 30 days. The facility has 20 beds and is located just beyond the City limits. People’s Place II – (Formerly known as Whatcoat Social Service Agency: Ruth M. Dorsey Shelter) This agency operates a relief shelter for homeless persons. It provides emergency food baskets, information and referral services, and transportation for in house clients. The services are available on a 24-hour basis, the average stay at the shelter is 2-3 weeks, but does not exceed 30 days. This facility has 46 beds. Connections Community Support Program - This agency is the only agency in the city that exclusively services the chronically homeless. Their facility has 10 beds in addition to supportive services programs for their clients. Dover Interfaith Mission for Housing – This agency is a newly established 501(c) 3 that will provide 40 to 50 beds year round for homeless persons and is estimated to serve 150 persons annually.

24 CITY OF DOVER HOMELESS POPULATION The Homeless Planning Council of Delaware conducted a point-in-time study on January 27, 2009. The number of homeless identified was based on a survey of shelters and other homeless service providers, providers serving homeless individuals with mental health, substance abuse disorders, and anecdotal information. The homeless population for the City of Dover was estimated at 254 individuals. Of the 254 individuals, 200 were adults and 54 were children from the ages of 0-17 accounting for 32 families. Of the unaccompanied adults (159 persons) 53 met the definition of chronically homeless which is an unaccompanied individual who has a disabling condition and has been homeless for a year or more, or had at least four episodes of homelessness in the past three years. Table 1A diagrams the emergency families sheltered, transitional families sheltered, permanent families sheltered and emergency shelters in the City of Dover, with subpopulations for Kent County included on page 26. HOMELESS NEEDS AND FACILITIES ● The State of Delaware’s welfare reform legislation essentially replaces the idea of “entitlements” to persons with a new system of incentives linking benefits to obtaining employment. This argues for expanding job opportunities available to low and moderate income persons. ● There are a series of programs, grants, and charity foundations that will help persons “at risk” of homelessness by providing assistance with rent, mortgage payments, and utility bills on a one time basis. Connections Community Support Program also provides vouchers for motel stays on a short-term basis. However, the challenge is to match the program with the persons or households in need. ● There are only two emergency homeless shelters in Kent County, both in the immediate Dover area. The Shepherd Place is located just south of the Dover City limits. People’s Place is located on College Road. Both have a maximum stay of 30 days, and are usually full to capacity with a waiting list. Other facilities, such as the Salvation Army, open their doors to the homeless during periods of extreme heat or cold. Dover Interfaith Mission to the Homeless is a newly established 501(c) 3 that has plans to open a homeless shelter in the City that will provide 40 to 50 beds year round and provide shelter for 30 to 90 days. Renovations for this project are currently underway and they are expected to serve up to 150 homeless persons annually. ● Whatcoat Social Services (now People’s Place) constructed 10 transitional housing units in 2007 on the land adjacent to the shelter. Clients will participate in the program for at least two years. While in the program, the clients will be expected to receive further education, obtain job skills and accept case

25 management which will prepare them for eventual home ownership. The goal is to reduce the housing gap of continuum care in the City of Dover. ● There is a great need for “transitional housing.” It is estimated by the service providers that it takes the average family a period of 90 days to move from homelessness, to a stable job and finally to a new home. With the maximum stay at the emergency shelters limited to 30 days, many families find themselves homeless a second time before they can obtain more permanent housing. Homeless Prevention Activities and Chronic Homelessness Community Development staff has been identified as a Stakeholder and serves as a member of The Delaware Interagency Homeless Planning Council to oversee the implementation of the plan and educate the community about the need and for the advantages of ending chronic homelessness. The City will continue to participate as a member of the Homeless Council to assist in addressing the needs to end chronic homelessness. The City has developed the following goals to assist in homeless prevention: ● Complete a Fair Housing Plan in the fall of 2010 that will identify housing impediments for the City of Dover, and work to successfully eliminate those impediments. ● Continue to utilize programs to eliminate significant barriers to affordable housing. ● Continue working with the two housing authorities and other housing providers to provide assistance to very low and extremely low income persons. ● Continue working with the Delaware Fair Housing Task Force to ensure fair treatment and fair housing practices are being administered to City of Dover residents through outreach and education that will be provided by Dover Housing Authority and the Kent County Human Relations Division. The series of tables in Table 1A provide information of the most recent Point in Time survey conducted on January 27, 2009. The survey was conducted by the Homeless Planning Council of Delaware.

26 Table 1A Homeless and Special Needs Population Emergency Families Sheltered City of Dover Agency County # of Number Persons in Total individuals of beds family with served children year round Peoples Kent 11 12 3 95 Place II Shepherd Kent 20 30 13 499 Place People’s Kent 28 46 10 583 Place II Total 59 88 26 1177 Subpopulations Served in Emergency Housing for Families on January 27, 2009 Kent County Capacity 66 Numbered Sheltered 59 Seriously Mentally III 0 Chronic Substance Abuser 0 Veterans 1 Persons with AIDS 0 Victims of Domestic Violence 1 Unaccompanied Youth under 3 18 years of age Total 130 Emergency Shelters, City of Dover (non family) Agency County # of Number of Total individuals beds served year round House of Kent 10 24 18 Pride Aid in Kent 1 6 16 Dover Dover Kent 27 28 200 Interfaith Mission Totals 38 58 234

27 Subpopulations Served in Emergency Shelters non family on January 27, 2009 Kent County Capacity 58 Numbered Sheltered 38 Chronically Homeless 10 Seriously Mentally Ill 3 Chronic Substance Abusers 5 Persons with AIDS 0 Total 114 Permanent Housing Programs Agency County # of Number Total individuals of beds served year round Connections Kent 32 30 46 Easy Access Transitional Housing Programs Agency County # of Number Total individuals of beds served year round House of Kent 10 24 18 Pride Connections Kent 17 22 25 Aid in Dover Kent 6 6 17 Totals 33 52 60 Transitional Sheltered Subpopulations Served in Transitional Housing on January 27, 2009 Kent County Capacity 52 Numbered Sheltered 33 Seriously Mentally Ill 0 Chronic Substance Abuser 0 Veterans 0 Persons with AIDS 3 Victims of Domestic Violence 0

28 Unmet Needs The Continuum of Care table identifies that there are 1,648 beds needed for transitional or permanent supportive housing. Of the additional beds, 220 would be designated for transitional housing for homeless individuals and 1,398 would be designated for the homeless individual in long term supportive housing. There is no additional need seen for emergency shelter beds, although current (2010) economic conditions have increased demand for emergency shelter beds and some providers are reporting a presumably short term need. Unmet Homeless Needs in Delaware, 2009 All Year –Round Beds/Units Beds for Units for Beds for Households Households with Households Total Year Round Children without Children Beds with Children Emergency Shelter 0 0 0 0 Transitional Housing 0 0 220 220 Safe Haven 0 0 0 0 Permanent Supportive 30 15 1398 Housing 1398 Total 30 15 1618 1648 SOURCE: 2009 EXHIBIT 1: DELAWARE STATE –WIDE CONTINUUM OF CARE III.5 SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITIES AND SERVICES (24 CFR 91.215(d)) Elderly and the Frail Elderly – Housing for the elderly population has continued to grow with expansion of existing facilities and the completion of new senior housing complexes. The City has a large number of assisted living providers including: Luther Towers, Westminster Village, Luther Village, Owens Manor, Silver Lake, and Courtland Manor. Dover has 1,228 dedicated senior-living units, of which 489 are independent living facilities or apartments, 450 are nursing home beds, and 290 assisted living beds. These facilities typically require a substantial entry fee and $1200 to $2000 per month in rental and service fees. Handicapped Disabled - There is one group home in the City of Dover that serves 8 people. The facility is operated by Ken Crest, Inc. located on Walker Road. There are a number of other single-family dwellings that have been converted to group homes meeting the definition of a single-family dwelling, contributing to a combined total of 22 beds. Transitional Housing Recovery Program – The House of Pride provides short-term and long-term transitional living for those who have a substance abuse as well as a recovery program that provides an array of services that include prevention education, counseling,

29 pre-employment skills, and training required for successful employment in order to gain the self-sufficiency of the client. Connections CSP, Inc. – The Connections program has developed a new permanent housing project which operates in the City of Dover located in the Country Village Apartments. This project provides rental subsidies for the supervision of 10 homeless adults who have substance use disorders and who are receiving treatment in Connections’ Alcohol and Drug Day Treatment Program in Kent County. IV HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS (24 CFR 91.210) IV.1 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS At the time of the 2000 Census there were 13,195 dwelling units in the City of Dover. Of these housing units, 12,340 were occupied. Just over half of these (6,454 or 52%) were owner occupied with the remaining 5,886 (48%) are rental units. There was a 6.5% vacancy rate for the rental units. This low vacancy rate indicated a need for rental housing. . Dover’s housing stock is of significantly different composition than the housing typically found in the rest of the State of Delaware and Kent County. In keeping with Dover’s more urban environment, multi-family units accounted for approximately 34.8% of housing units in Dover in the year 2000. In the same year, multi-family units composed only 18.7% of units in the entire state and 14.5% in Kent County. Similarly, 44.8% of Dover’s housing units were of the single-family detached variety, while this housing type accounted for 55.9% of all the state’s housing units and 58.4% of all Kent County’s housing units. The age of Dover’s housing stock is comparable to the age of housing stock across the State with the median year of construction for owner-occupied houses in 1974. Nearly half of all housing units in the City of Dover were occupied by renters in the year 2000, while renters occupied less than a third of housing in Kent County and the State of Delaware. Reflective of a well-educated and significant professional workforce, a higher percentage of Dover’s residents have admitted a Bachelor’s degree or higher than have done so at the State or County level, However, Dover’s median household income of $38,669 is less than the median income for the State ($47,381) and Kent County ($40,950) as per the 2000 Census data. Also, a greater percentage of Dover’s residents live below the poverty level than do across the State and County. The vacancy for owner and renter occupied units indicates there is not a shortage of housing, but there is a strong demand. The number of new residential housing developments validates this recently approved by the City of Dover. From 2003-2007 the City of Dover’s Planning Commission approved a total of 3,755 new residential units. Of these units, 1,076 were single family detached, 1,207 were single family attached, with the majority being 1,282 multifamily units. As these numbers indicate, none of the types of units proposed dominates the other. Grouping the single-family unit types does however dominate the multi-family. The trend towards providing alternative affordable

30 housing opportunities indicates that there is and will continue to be a need for first time homebuyers and low to moderate-income buyers’ assistance. IV.2 PUBLIC AND ASSISTED HOUSING (24 CFR 91.210 b) The City of Dover is served by two public housing authorities: the Dover Housing Authority and the Delaware State Housing Authority. The two housing authorities operate public housing units within the City of Dover. The following tables demonstrate the number of units and the bedroom distribution for both housing authority’s public and subsidized units: Table IV B-2 Dover Housing Authority PUBLIC OR SUBSIDIZED UNITS BY BEDROOM SIZE 0/1 2 3 4 5 DEVELOPMENT BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM TOTAL Colonial Gardens 0/0 11 22 8 5 46 Senate View 0/0 22 38 0 0 60 Queen Manor 30 / 18 2 0 0 0 50 Manchester Square 0/8 30 22 12 3 75 Manchester Court 0/0 0 8 0 0 8 Hayes Drive 0/0 0 14 0 0 14 Scattered Sites I 0/0 0 9 1 0 10 Scattered Site II 0/0 0 9 1 0 10 Scattered Site III 0/0 0 5 0 0 5 Scattered Site IV 0/0 0 4 0 0 4 Scattered Site V 0/0 2 0 0 0 2 Derby Estates I 0/0 5 8 2 0 15 Derby Estates II 0/0 6 9 0 0 15 Owens Manor 0/48 12 0 0 0 60 TOTAL 30 / 74 90 148 24 8 374 Source: Dover Housing Authority 2005 The Dover Housing Authority (DHA) has a total of 314 public housing units available for occupancy. The majority of these units have 3 bedrooms (47%). DHA also completed the construction of Owens Manor, a 60 unit senior housing building in 2000, bringing the public total of public housing units to 374.

31 Table IV B-3 Delaware State Housing Authority PUBLIC HOUSING UNITS BY BEDROOM SIZE IN THE CITY OF DOVER 0/1 2 3 4 5 DEVELOPMENT BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM TOTAL Liberty Court 0/25 71 12 0 0 108 Capital Green 0/6 99 33 6 0 144 TOTAL 0/31 170 45 6 0 252 Delaware State Housing Authority 2010 Table IV B-4 PRIVATE LOW/MOD INCOME HOUSING PROJECTS UNIT TYPE FAMILY/ELDERLY NUMBER OF DEVELOPMENT UNITS Willis Road Estates Townhouse Family 17 The Laurels Townhouse Family 76 Walker Woods I Townhouse Family 51 Walker Woods II Townhouse Family 19 East Lake Apartments Apartments Family 48 River Chase Apartments Family 78 Whatcoat Village Apartments Family 78 New Hope Housing Apartments Family 23 New Hope Housing II Apartments Family 18 Persimmon Tree Apartments Family 95 Mishoe Towers Apartments Elderly 25 Luther Towers I Apartments Elderly 149 Luther Towers II Apartments Elderly 50 Luther Towers III Apartments Elderly 49 Luther Towers IV Apartments Elderly 44 Luther Village I Apartments Elderly 68 Luther Village II Apartments Elderly 32 Clearfield Apartments Family 96 TOTAL 1016 City of Dover Public Services Department 2010 There are at least 1,016 low to moderate-income rental housing units located in the City of Dover. Of these units, 317 are designated as elderly with 599 units being family. Using the 2000 U. S. Census data that there are 13,195 dwelling units in the City, low to moderate-income rental units account for 7% of the housing stock. When considered in combination with public housing there are a total of 1,386 rental units available to low to moderate-income persons in the City of Dover at below market rates and account for 11% of the total housing stock. IV.3 SECTION 8 HOUSING Both the Dover Housing Authority and the Delaware State Housing Authority provide rental assistance to low and moderate-income persons through HUD's Section 8 Program. The following tables demonstrate the number of units and the bedroom distribution for both housing authorities Section 8 Rental Vouchers:

32 TABLE III-B-5 DOVER HOUSING AUTHORITY (DHA) SECTION 8 RENTAL VOUCHERS OFFERED IN THE CITY OF DOVER 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom 1 45 48 70 19 2 0 185 Source: Dover Housing Authority 2010 The Dover Housing Authority offers a total of 220 rental vouchers through the Section 8 program issued by HUD. All of these are tenant based, meaning that they are offered only to tenants of DHA’s waiting list. Presently 84% of these vouchers were under lease agreements, with the exception of 30 mainstream vouchers in which 100% are in utilization. Currently 657 applicants are on the waiting list which was closed on January 1, 2010. Table III-B-6 DELAWARE STATE HOUSING AUTHORITY (DSHA) SECTION 8 RENTAL VOUCHERS OFFERED IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE 1 2 3 4 5 Total Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Rental Vouchers 330 307 230 35 3 905 Source: Delaware State Housing Authority 2010 OWENS MANOR SENIOR HOUSING 1 2 Total Bedroom Bedroom Rental Vouchers 48 12 60 Source: Dover Housing Authority 2010 The Delaware State Housing Authority offers a total of 905 rental vouchers through the Section 8 program for the State of Delaware. These vouchers are offered to families seeking housing within the three counties of the State. There are no anticipated "losses" to the Section 8 inventory due to prepayment or voluntary termination of a federally assisted mortgage. DSHA is the Public Housing Authority for Kent and Sussex Counties with the exception of the City of Dover. DSHA owns and operates 508 units of Public Housing located throughout both counties and administers 905 Housing Choice Vouchers subsidizing rent in private-sector housing. In addition, DSHA administers 50 Family Unification Vouchers (FUP). FUP is a program under which vouchers are provided to families for

33 whom the lack of adequate housing is a primary factor in the imminent placement of the family’s child, or children, in out-of-home care; or the delay in the discharge of the child, or children, to the family from out of home care. Youths at least 18 years old and not more than 21 years old who left foster care at age 16 or older and who do not have adequate housing are also eligible to receive housing assistance. DSHA currently allocates 20 vouchers for family unification and 30 vouchers for foster youth. Dover’s owner occupied housing units are what one would expect in a community that went through major growth during the Post-War suburbanizing period. Most of these units have three or more bedrooms. Dover had 13,357 dwelling units in 2000, in which 12,340 were owner occupied. This represents a 26% increase in total units available from 1990 to 2000. Of the occupied units, 52% were owner occupied and 48% were rental units, which was a 2% increase in occupied rental units from 1990. The median value of an owner occupied dwelling unit was $111,300 in 2000. The median gross rent for the renter occupied unit was $577. The typical apartment unit has 2 bedrooms. One bedroom and three bedrooms hold 30 and 20% of the market respectfully. IV.4 BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING (24 CFR 91.210 (e)) At this time, it is the City of Dover's contention that there are no "barriers to affordable housing" which describes dwelling units whose total costs are deemed “affordable” to those who have a median income. The following is a sample of current public policies, which support and encourage affordable housing: • Inclusionary Zoning - Unlike many communities, Dover has not practiced “exclusionary zoning” were most of the underdeveloped land is designated for large lot single family detached homes. To the contrary, The Dover Plan (Dover’s Comprehensive Plan) designates a large portion of underdeveloped lands for medium density housing, and a smaller but significant portion for high density housing. The land is subsequently zoned accordingly, permitting a range of residential densities and housing types. The most recent plan, the 2008 Comprehensive Plan was adopted in February 2009. The Land Development Plan specifically identifies a range of residential land uses from low density to high density throughout the City. The plan continues to recommend a range of residential densities and focuses specifically on housing in one chapter. • Traditional Neighborhood Design Zone - The ordinance establishing the Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) was adopted in 2004 allows for the creation of a walkable pedestrian friendly mixed-use neighborhood with residential, commercial, and professional office areas. As the first TND project in the City, the Eden Hill Farm TND is under construction. By the end of 2009 Phase I of the residential district included a total of 21 townhouses with construction of additional townhouse units and duplex units anticipated in 2010. In 2008, the first office building in the office district was completed. The general overall master plan for the development incorporates a mix of residential types from single family homes to townhouses and the potential for apartments over commercial uses.

34 • Planned Neighborhood Design Option – The Planned Neighborhood Design (PND) encourages superior site design by relaxing bulk standards, requiring more open space and recreational areas, permitting various housing styles in all zones, and providing incentives to mix housing types to encourage less homogeneous development patterns. Accessory apartment associated with single family residences are permitted if certain design criteria are met. Density bonuses for community features (such as neighborhood commercial uses for day care centers) are offered. Although there are no direct requirements for affordable housing or subsidized units, clearly these types of units could easily accommodate within these style developments. Four PND developments are currently under construction (Lexington Glen, Clearview Meadows, Village of Cannon Mills and Patriot Village) and propose to offer over 800 new housing units including single family detached, townhouses, duplexes, and apartment units. Stonebrook West and Stonebrook East are PND projects yet to start construction. Phase I of the Luther Village PND provides 68 units and Phase II provides 32 units in a Senior Citizen Housing Option for low & very low income persons. Several other PND projects pending construction are under the senior citizen housing option are The Arbors and Dove View Senior Apartments. Several apartment projects are also under review including Woodmill Apartment Expansion and Leander Lakes Apartments that will provide this housing type adjacent to other residential types and near commercial areas. Blue Hen Apartments Complex is currently under construction. • Incentives for Downtown Development - In order to encourage the redevelopment of downtown Dover, special incentives are offered in specified areas. These incentives include parking requirement reductions, tax incentives, sanitary sewer and water impact fee waivers, and building permit fee caps. In addition, many properties may be eligible for Historic Preservation Tax Credits. The Downtown Dover Partnership offers a façade grant program. • Support of Public and Assisted Housing - In the City of Dover there are two full service housing authorities, and numerous assisted housing projects offering below market rents to those with low to moderate incomes. Currently there are 1,174 of these units in the city, which represents nearly 10% of Dover's total housing stock. It is the City of Dover's policy to support the activities of our two housing authorities. In addition, there are no policy-based disincentives for the construction of additional assisted housing units in appropriate zoning districts. • Lien Forgiveness for Habitat For Humanity - The City of Dover has a policy to forgive any liens for back taxes on properties which is acquired by Habitat for Humanity. This policy serves to provide an incentive to rehabilitate older properties, and place them back in the housing stock as owner occupied units.

35 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS In preparation for determining the needs of the community, the City conducted a series of workshops to obtain the views of citizens, State agencies, Civic Leaders and the State Public Housing Authority. The comments are listed below. Homeless Needs: The City of Dover is involved in several efforts to promote homeownership throughout the City, but particularly in the Downtown Target Area. The Target Area is defined The City will review alternatives for zoning amendments that promote general availability of affordable homeownership opportunities as well as continue to provide CDBG funding to projects that will assist with the homeless needs in the city. Housing Needs: Throughout the five years, the City will prioritize housing needs in the Target Area and throughout the City limits. The housing initiatives will include housing rehabilitation, emergency home repairs, and expand minority homeownership with the assistance of down payment assistance. The City through the Neighborhood Stabilization Program will provide affordable housing with the purchase of foreclosed properties that will be renovated and brought up to code to be sold to qualifying homebuyers. The City will also provide CDBG funding for the renovation of housing units Citywide to be sold to low to moderate income families and continue to partner with NCALL to provide down payment assistance to low to moderate income families throughout the City. Public Service Needs: The City will continue with the Crime Prevention Program as part of a need determined in the public workshop. This program has been very successful in the target area in the area of reducing crime. The city will also continue to support social service programs that will provide services to low income persons. Public Facilities: The Eight-O-One Shelter who provides emergency diagnostic shelter serves for children and youth between the ages of 10 and 18 who are at risk for abuse, neglect, dependency and homelessness, has plans for development of a Youth Activity Center. This center will provide an environment in which homeless children and youth earn access to specialized recreational activities. The Activity Center will assist young people by positively reinforcing behaviors which are directed at the importance of respecting themselves and others, their own property and the property of others. Infrastructure Improvements: The City of Dover began the streets improvement project in FY03 to reconstruct the streets and curbs in the Target Area to increase the livability of the neighborhood. CDBG funds and other funding sources were used to complete this project. A reconstruction project of streets, sidewalks and curbs was completed in 2006. In future years, the City

36 will fund street and sidewalk construction .in other low to moderate income areas throughout the City. Economic Development: Economic development is one of the most important issues facing the City of Dover over the next 20 years. The City of Dover effectively serves as the core of central Delaware and is the leader in the area’s economic growth. Today, more than half of the population of Kent County lives in and around Dover. Dover is a city that hosts a diverse mixture of major commercial and manufacturing firms, in addition to a large retail, hospitality and public sector. Regional development patterns and recent improvements in the area’s transportation infrastructure have increased the accessibility of Dover to and from larger urban markets north and west of the City. Consequently, the City is in a position to attract and benefit from new and developing economic sectors. The City of Dover 2008 Comprehensive Plan has developed Economic Development Goals that the City will implement throughout the five year plan. The following is an excerpt from Chapter 10 of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Goals and Recommendations. Progress has been made in several of the goals to date including the establishment of the City’s Economic Development office in October 2008. Part II – Plan Goals: Economic Development Goal 1: Attract and Retain High-Paying Quality Jobs by Targeting Large Firms and Businesses to Major Growth Areas in the City Recommendation 1: Adopt Economic Development Strategies Recommendation 2: Hire an Economic Development Professional to Attract and Retain Businesses within the City of Dover Goal 2: Revitalize Downtown Dover as a Vibrant Town Center Integrating the Hospital, the Colleges & Universities, the State and City Governments with Business (Retail and Professional), Housing and Tourism Recommendation 3: Continue to Develop and Promote Incentives for Downtown Redevelopment Recommendation 4: Adopt 2006 Downtown Dover Economic Enhancement Strategy (DDEES) (Hyett-Palma Strategy) Recommendation 5: Create a Visual Master Plan and Form-Based Code for Downtown Recommendation 6: Support Mixed-Use Development

37 Goal 3: Ensure that Zoning Requirements Encourage the Uses Desired and Do Not Create Impediments to Desired Business Growth Recommendations 7: Review and Modify Zoning Districts to ensure that Desired Uses are encouraged and Incompatible Uses are tightly controlled Recommendation 8: Protect existing establishments from encroachment: Goal 4: Create an Environment for Long Term Economic Investment in Dover Focusing on Green Technology and Entrepreneurial Businesses Recommendations 9: Separate light and heavy manufacturing to prohibit non- manufacturing entities in that respective zone. Goal 5: Actively Market Garrison Oak Recommendation 10: Develop a Master Plan for Garrison Oak that allows for interested parties to expedite the planning and building phases including the following: Recommendation 11: Market Garrison Oak as a potential site for green, alternative and low-carbon energy plant(s), and for large technological and manufacturing firms that support these industries. Recommendation 12: Explore the Creation of a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District for Garrison Oak Comprehensive Planning: The 2008 Comprehensive Plan for the City of Dover uses the information gathered and analyzed through public participation workshops, City Commissions and Council input and comprehensive history of the previous five years to set forth goals and recommendations. Table 1-1 provides a brief listing of the goals in each chapter. Table 1-1: Plan Chapter Goals: Natural Resources Goal 1: Protect the Natural Environment and Environmental Goal 2: Improve Watershed Quality Protection Goal 3: Encourage Green Development and Sustainable Energy Practices Goal 1: Preserve and Protect Historic Resources Historic Preservation Goal 2: Provide and Promote Incentives for Preservation Activities Goal 3: Increase Public Information on Historic Resources Goal 4: Collaborate with Diverse Groups and Governments

38 Goal 1: Proactively Maintain Existing Infrastructure and Expand Public Utilities and Infrastructure When Beneficial Community Goal 2: Enhance Infrastructure to Meet Community Needs Infrastructure Goal 3: Meet or exceed the State and Federal requirements of the NPDES permit and Stormwater Management Plan Goal 1: Provide a System of Interconnected Open Space Areas and Recreational Opportunities Goal 2: The City must be prepared to face and quickly address potential disasters both natural and man-made. Community Services Goal 3: The City should provide and Maintain high quality police, fire, and Facilities and ambulance services to all residents, properties, and visitors within Dover. Goal 4: The City should work to ensure the protection and preservation of its own resources ranging from natural, historic, and cultural including the physical facilities containing these resources. Goal 5: Protect and Preserve the City Owned Resources Goal 1: Preserve and Maintain the Existing Transportation System Goal 2: Increase Coordination with Agencies Transportation Goal 3: Develop and Expand Alternate Modes of Transportation Goal 4: Create Recommendations and Policies for Roadways and Development Goal 5: Air Quality: The Ozone Challenge Goal 1: Attract and Retain High-Paying Quality Jobs by Targeting Large Firms and Businesses to Major Growth Areas in the City Goal 2: Revitalize Downtown Dover as a Vibrant Town Center Integrating the Hospital, the Colleges & Universities, the State and City Economic Governments with Business (Retail and Professional), Housing and Development Tourism Goal 3: Ensure that Zoning Requirements Encourage the Uses Desired and Do Not Create Impediments to Desired Business Growth Goal 4: Create an Environment for Long Term Economic Investment in Dover Focusing on Green Technology and Entrepreneurial Businesses Goal 5: Actively Market Garrison Oak Goal 1: Encourage Balanced Housing Opportunities for All Income Levels and Phases in Life Housing & Goal 2: Preserve Existing Housing Stock Community Goal 3: Provide Safe Livable Neighborhoods Development Goal 4: Provide Homeownership Opportunities for Low/Moderate Income Source: 2008 Comprehensive Plan, City of Dover

39 Table 2B list the Non-Housing Community Development Needs as determined by the City of Dover’s City Manager’s office addressing the level of need and the estimated funding to address the needs. Table 2B Non-Housing Community Development Needs PRIORITY COMMUNITY Priority Need Level Estimated Estimated Dollars DEVELOPMENT NEEDS High, Medium, Low, Priority Units to Address No Such Need PUBLIC FACILITY NEEDS Neighborhood Facilities Low Unknown Unknown Parks and/or Recreation Facilities High 4 $1,700,000 Health Facilities State Provided Service N/A N/A Parking Facilities High 1 $500,000 Solid Waste Disposal Improvements Medium City Provided $500,000 Service Asbestos Removal High 1 $12,000 Non-Residential Historic Preservation State Provided Service N/A N/A Other Public Facility Needs High 1 Library INFRASTRUCTURE Water/Sewer Improvements High City Provided $12,746,500 Service Street Improvements Medium City Provided 6,500,000 Service Sidewalks Medium City Provided $250,000 Service Sewer Improvements High City Provided $16,764,000 Service Flood Drain Improvements Medium City Provided $250,000 Service Other Infrastructure Needs High City Provided $0 Service PUBLIC SERVICE NEEDS Handicapped Services State Provided Services N/A N/A Transportation Services State Provided Services N/A N/A Substance Abuse Services High CDBG funded Unknown Employment Training High CDBG funded Unknown Health Services State Provided Services N/A N/A Other Public Service Needs Medium CDBG funded Unknown ANTI-CRIME PROGRAMS Crime Awareness High $100,000 Other Anti-Crime Programs Medium $300,000

40 YOUTH PROGRAMS Youth Centers Medium Unknown Unknown Child Care Centers Low Unknown Unknown Youth Services Medium $5000 Child Care Services Low Unknown Unknown Other Youth Programs Medium Unknown Unknown SENIOR PROGRAMS Senior Centers Low Unknown Unknown Senior Services Medium Unknown Unknown Other Senior Programs Low Unknown Unknown ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Rehab; Publicly- or Privately – Owned High $500,000 Commercial/Industrial CI Infrastructure Development High Unknown Pending Other Commercial/Industrial Improvements Medium Unknown Unknown Micro-Enterprise Assistance Low Unknown Unknown ED Technical Assistance Low Unknown Unknown Other Economic Development Medium Unknown Unknown PLANNING Planning Low Unknown No funding available Source: City of Dover’s City Manager’s Office 2010

41 V STRATEGIC PLAN (24 CFR 91.25) V.1 GENERAL (A) This Consolidated Plan was prepared in compliance with the federal regulations requiring a Consolidated Plan every five years. The majority of the information has been updated; however, most of the base population numbers are over ten years old since they reference 2000 Census data. An analysis of the population information and HUD’s requirements was conducted by the Community Development Staff in conjunction with the City's Focus Groups. The following priorities have been prepared to guide our Community Development Block Grant Program into the next five years. A goal setting workshop was held on November 19, 2009 and January 7, 2010. The stakeholders and citizens were given the opportunity to determine the needs of the community. The following table demonstrates the results of the voting exercise of Community Development needs in order of priority. TABLE V – 1 PRIORITY RANKING RESULTS Total # of Priority Categories Priority Needs Participants Surveyed Housing Needs 2 7 Infrastructure Improvements 6 7 Public Service Needs 3 7 Homeless Needs 1 7 Public Facilities Needs 5 7 Economic Development Needs 4 7 The results of the voting led to the formulation of specific goals and objectives for the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan. The rankings are attributed to actual subcategory voting and combination of similar activities. In total, approximately 7 people participated in the goal setting workshops. The results combined with the guidelines from Housing and Urban Development have led us to establish 5 goals and objectives. The Goals follow in order of priority: Priority Goal Specific 1 Goal Provide aid to special needs persons. 2 Goal Preserve the existing housing stock in the City. 3 Goal Encourage owner occupied housing in low to moderate income areas.

42 4 Goal Provide safe and livable neighborhoods. 5 Goal Aid economic opportunity in low to moderate income areas. V.2 STRATEGY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING (24 CFR 91.215 (b)) As the entity responsible for HUD CDBG Entitlement Funds, the City of Dover is responsive to the housing needs of its low-moderate income residents. The City provides a wide variety of services to all of its residents as well as an increased effort to accommodate the needs of low-moderate income families. The City offers the following strategic plan to address the needs identified. The needs were developed through the Consolidated Plan process by the Community Development Department. The following strategies for the affordable housing are grouped together in a prioritiy set forth by HUD: PRIORITY: PROVIDE DECENT HOUSING GOAL 1: Encourage owner occupied housing in low/moderate-income areas. OBJECTIVES: The City through the Neighborhood Stabilization Program will purchase foreclosed properties, renovate and sell to qualifying homebuyers. The City will continue with the Homeownership Downpayment and Settlement Assistance Program to qualified families or individuals with assistance of up to $10,000.00. GOAL 2: Preserve the existing housing stock in the City of Dover. OBJECTIVES: The City will continue to rehabilitate owner occupied homes with families who are low to moderate income. The City will provide assistance to emergency repairs housing programs that will eliminate severe housing conditions that constitute health and safety hazards. The City will address the infrastructure needs in qualifying census tract areas with the reconstruction of streets and curbs.

43 GOAL 3: Provide safe and livable neighborhoods. OBJECTIVE: The City will work in conjunction with the Dover Police Department to continue Community Policing in the target area. GOAL 4: Provide aid to special needs persons OBJECTIVE: The City will support the city’s homeless population by working with non-profit organizations and other housing providers. V.3 BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING (24 CFR 91.215(e)) At this time, it is the City of Dover's contention that there are no "barriers to affordable housing" which is the result of public policy. V.4 INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE Current Institutional Structure Dover's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program is administered by the Dover Community Development Office. This office is a part of the City of Dover Department of Planning and Inspections. As needed, the Department of Planning and Inspections provides planning, administrative, and other assistance to the Community Development Office. The Community Development Manager has been designated by the Mayor to manage and disperse CDBG funds. In order to assist the Manager in the preparation of plans, drafting of priorities and review of funding applications, the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee (PR&CE) has been designated as the review committee. This committee is comprised of three City Council persons and two citizens. The PR&CE Committee also votes on and has final approval on funding applications. Organizational Relationships The City of Dover has close working relationships with the service providers and housing authorities in Dover. These relationships are described below: Public Housing: The City of Dover is served by two housing authorities. The Delaware State Housing Authority (DSHA) is a statewide organization. The Dover Housing

44 Authority (DHA) is a local agency, which only operates within Dover. Both of these Housing Authorities offer Public Housing, Section 8 rental assistance, and supportive services to residents of Dover. The City of Dover supports and assists these housing authorities through direct funding, zoning accommodation, and infrastructure improvements where necessary. The City of Dover and the two housing authorities are also linked through a continuous dialogue about housing and planning issues in Dover. Homeless Shelter: The Ruth N. Dorsey Shelter, operated by Peoples Place II is the only homeless shelter in the City of Dover. This facility provides 46 beds for homeless families. The City of Dover has supported the shelter over the past several years by providing CDBG funding to address their renovation needs. Other Service Providers: The City of Dover regularly works with other members of the local network of service providers. These providers include: The House of P.R.I.D.E. Peoples Place II NCALL City of Dover Police Department Dover Interfaith Mission Diamond State Community Land Trust Gaps in the Delivery System There are specific barriers to Fair Housing that continue to permeate the fabric of the City of Dover’s communities that still have not been addressed in the State’s Analysis of Impediments. These impediments will be addressed in the 2010 Analysis of Impediments that will be completed in the fall of 2010. Strengths in the Delivery System The City is in the process of addressing the barriers to fair housing that exist in the City and the State and will include specific actions the City will take to address the impediments to further fair housing. The 2010 Analysis of Impediments is underway. The City is part of the collaboration with Delaware State Housing Authority, New Castle County and the City of Wilmington to implement this plan. Community Development staff is still an active member on the Fair Housing Task Force of Delaware and will continue to provide outreach and education in the community. Gaps in the Delivery System for Public Housing The City has successfully bridged the gap in the system in our relationship with Dover Housing Authority (DHA). Since 2005, the City has provided grants to DHA to renovate two homes in the City’s target area to be sold to low to moderate income persons as part of Senator Carper’s Homeownership Initiative. Strengths in the Delivery System for Public Housing The City has joined a partnership with Dover Housing Authority as one of the three partners for funding received from Delaware State Housing Authority for the

45 Neighborhood Stabilization Program to purchase foreclosed and abandoned properties, renovate them and sell them qualified homebuyers. The City is also working with Dover Housing Authority in conjunction with Habitat for Humanity for a one day clean up event in the target area focusing on improving curb appeal and streetscape in the downtown target area that is scheduled for August 2010. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing The City of Dover has collaborated with Delaware State Housing Authority, New Castle County and the City of Wilmington to complete and Analysis of Impediments that is expected to be completed in the fall of 2010. The study will include a breakdown of the impediments specifically for the City of Dover, in which the city will take measures to eliminate once identified. The Community Development Manager is also a member of the Delaware Fair Housing Task Force that continues to work effortlessly to eliminate the impediments throughout the State of Delaware. V.5 PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS The Dover Housing Authority has established the following objectives for fiscal year 2010: 1. With funds received through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the Authority is making energy efficiency improvements in all of its public housing units. The Authority is improving window and door seals, installing additional insulation, and installing energy efficient hot water heaters. At its elderly site, Queen Manor Senior Apartments, the Authority is making improvements to the roof and replacing all unit windows to energy rated windows. 2. The second major project started in calendar year 2010 is major renovations to be completed on units at the Authority’s Senate View public housing development. The renovations will include installation of additional site lighting and installation of a security system to ensure the safety and security of the residents as well as the construction site. 3. Through its subsidiary, Dover Community Partnership, Inc., the Authority will re-start its efforts to revitalize a 20-block area of Downtown Dover. PUBLIC HOUSING RESIDENT INITIATIVES: The Dover Housing Authority continues to provide services and programs that empower residents achieve economic self-sufficiency: 1. Family Self-Sufficiency Program 2. Homeownership Program (Public Housing, Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher, and the Carper/City of Dover Homeownership Initiative (available to the general public meeting program criteria)

46 3. GED/ABE Literacy Classes 4. Employment Training for Adults and Youth 5. After School and Summer Programs for Youth 6. Life Skills and Soft Skills Training for Adults V.6 LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUCTION In 2000, the City of Dover had 13,359 housing units in its jurisdiction based on 2000 US Census Data. Of those 5,886 are renter occupied and 6,454 are owner occupied. Of our renter-occupied units 3,376 units or about 70% of the total were built before 1979. Of the owner-occupied unites 4,179 units or about 80% of the total were built before 1979. Although the City does not have detailed data on the potential incidence of the lead-based paint hazard, these statistics at least indicate that the City’s housing stock is highly “at- risk”. In addition, a high incidence of the rental (65%) and owner occupied (35%) units that are “at-risk” are occupied by very-low income families that are at least able to be in position to afford the abatement of the hazard if it does exist. Currently, the State of Delaware of Public Health enforces lead-based paint abatement within the City of Dover. Under the State’s program, families with children who have been diagnosed by the Public Health Centers with lead poisoning are referred to a State Lead-Based Paint Inspector. The Inspector then performs the relevant technical analysis of the family residence. If lead-based paint is discovered, abatement is required. The City of Dover Department of Inspections acts in partnership with the State in assuring that lead based paint hazards are reduced or eliminated, and the affected housing units are brought up to code. The City currently requires lead-based paint testing and abatement in conjunction with its Home Repair Loan Program and CDBG rehabilitation programs. The City of Dover Department of Planning and Inspections does not have the equipment necessary to accurately identify lead-based paint during housing inspections. However, the City staff attended Lead-Based paint workshop and is currently working with the State Health Department for Inspector training and certification. In addition to the activities of the City of Dover and the State of Delaware Department of Public Health, the Dover Housing Authority has been active in lead-based paint abatement in the City. The Dover Housing Authority has tested and abated lead-based paint in all its Public Housing units. The Dover Housing Authority also deals with the lead based paint hazard in private rental units through the enforcement of the Housing Quality Standards in conjunction with its Section 8 Rental Voucher Program. V.7 ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY In 2000, the US Census found that approximately 13.8% of Dover's population lived below the poverty level. This percentage was somewhat higher than surrounding areas in

47 Kent County (which had 8.1% of the population below poverty level) and higher than the average for the State of Delaware (6.5%). Clearly, there is a concentration of persons living below the poverty level in Dover. To address poverty within the City of Dover, a multi-faceted Anti Poverty Strategy will be described below. This strategy stresses partnership with and the support of other agencies and organizations. Within the City of Dover there are two full service housing authorities, and various social service agencies which need and deserve the City's support. In addition to these service providers, the City of Dover will direct revitalization, economic development, and code enforcement efforts at low to moderate income neighborhoods. This will provide quality places for people in these neighborhoods to live and work, and provide them with new and better opportunities to earn a living. The following are the four main elements of the City of Dover's Anti-Poverty Strategy: • Highest Priority Given to Funding Proposals which Address or Fight Poverty: The City of Dover’s PR&CE Committee will give the highest priority in the Five Year Plan to proposals which are targeted towards those living in poverty. These proposals must be consistent with one or more of the following Priorities identified in this plan: o Encourage Affordable Owner Occupied Housing in Low to Moderate Income Areas o Improve Quality of Housing Stock o Aid in Economic Opportunities in Low to Moderate Income Areas • Support Family Self-Sufficiency Programs and other Resident Initiatives/Counseling Programs at Dover's Housing Authorities: Both the Delaware State Housing Authority and the Dover Housing Authority provide their residents with support and assistance in job training, parenting, counseling, financial management, and other skills. These programs are integrated in the housing programs through the Family Self-Sufficiency Program and/or other Resident Initiatives. It is the position of the City of Dover that these programs provide excellent opportunities for those in public housing to become economically and socially self sufficient. The City of Dover will provide assistance and support as requested to encourage the continuance of these programs. • Support the Various Social Service Providers that serve Dover's poor: There is a network of service providers presently operating in Dover that serve the City's poor. These providers include The State of Delaware Division of Health and Social Services and the State Service Centers. There are also numerous non- profit corporations within the City, including the House of Pride and People’s Place and Dover Interfaith Mission to the homeless. The City will support the

48 missions and the functions of these organizations by providing technical and planning support, and when possible implementing physical improvements to infrastructure, which serves these facilities. • Economic Development: The only way to solve the problem of poverty is to help families earn more money. To do so, there must be an abundant supply of jobs available to low and moderate income persons. It is the strategy of the City to use multiple approaches to job creation. Through the Downtown Dover Partnership encourages the development and expansion of businesses in the Downtown Area. A special focus should be firms, which provide jobs for low to moderate-income persons. Job creation in the Downtown area will serve the dual goals of maintaining and enhancing the older buildings in this historic area, and providing employment in close proximity to a low to moderate income neighborhood. The Central Delaware Chamber of Commerce encourages the development of new business elsewhere in the Dover area. The attraction and retention of new corporations and manufacturing firms to Dover will provide additional jobs for low to moderate-income persons. One opportunity for new business location is the Garrison Oak Technology Park.

49 VI Action Plan VI.1 Introduction The 2010 Action Plan is a supplementary document to the five-year Consolidated Plan (2010-2014). The Goals and Objectives focus on developing and sustaining viable communities and improving low and moderate income persons are addressed in the Consolidated Plan as part of the strategy for addressing the needs of low and moderate income people. The specific goals and objectives are presented in this Action Plan. Each year the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development upon congressional approval allocates to the City of Dover Community Development Block Grant Program. VI.2 Application for Federal Assistance The Application for Federal Assistance from the City of Dover for the 2010 fiscal year will be included in the Consolidated Plan submitted to HUD once approved by City Council.

50 CITY OF DOVER FISCAL YEAR 2010 CDBG FEDERAL RESOURCES City of Dover Federal Resources CDBG Action Plan 7/01/10 – 6/30/11 Dover, DE 19901 CDBG FEDERAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE FOR USE: CDBG Anticipated Funds Allocation: $274,000 Anticipated Program Income $ 10,292 Total: ________ $284,292

51 VI.3 BACKGROUND The Congress of the U.S., through the enactment of the “Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, has authorized that Federal funds be allocated to the entitlement community, the City of Dover, Delaware, to support Community Development activities within the boundaries of the City. ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITY AND CERTIFICATION The Mayor and Council has duly adopted as an official act a resolution authorizing Tracey N. Harvey as the official representative of the City of Dover to submit certifications to the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development that are required by Section 106(d) (2) (c) (iv) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992. A copy of the certifications can be found in section VIII titled “Certifications” in this document. AMOUNT OF AVAILABLE FUNDS The City of Dover is in receipt of fiscal year 2010 CDBG fund assignment. The total fiscal year 2010 fund assignment for Dover is $296,526. An amendment will be made during fiscal 2010 to allocate the additional funding received from HUD. PROGRAM DESIGN The City CDBG Program has been designed so as:  To give maximum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low and moderate income persons; or  To aid in the prevention of slums or neighborhood blight; and to meet other Community Development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health and welfare of the community where other financial resources are not available to meet such needs.  The funds shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less than 70 percent of such funds are used for activities that benefit low and moderate income.

52 VI.4 Resources (24 CFR 91.220 (b)) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (24 CFR 91.220 (b) (1)) The City of Dover anticipates that it will be pursuing funding opportunities in conjunction with the following federal programs to support the activities specified in this Consolidated Plan: Public Housing Development Program: Provides capital grants to local public housing authorities for the acquisition and/or rehabilitation of existing rental properties, or the construction of new rental units for low-income families. Responsible agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development. Community Development Block Grant: See local program description. Affordable Housing Program: Provides subsidy funds for low-income and moderate- income households through number of institutions of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) for the purchase, construction or rehabilitation of affordable rental or owner occupied housing. Responsible agency: FHLBB. Community Investment Program: Provides funds through number of institutions of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLBB) for community – oriented mortgage lending, including home purchase and rehabilitation for both renter and owner occupants, and to finance commercial and economic development activities. Responsible agency: FHLBB. Lead Based Paint Abatement Program: Provides grants to abate lead-based paint and lead dust in low and moderate-income owner occupied units, and in low-income privately owned rental units. Responsible agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development. NON-FEDERAL PUBLIC PROGRAMS (24 CFR 91.220 (b) (2)) 1. STATE PROGRAMS Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program (HRLP): Kent County provides home improvement loans to owner-occupants or landlords interested in moderately rehabilitating existing properties. These loans, up to a maximum amount of $15,000 per unit, are made at 3% interest rate for a term up to ten years. Program is available statewide. 2. LOCAL PROGRAMS City of Dover Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program: This program has been designed to expand housing opportunities and housing choices for low and moderate income persons living in targeted areas of Dover, to protect the public health and welfare of Dover citizens, especially low and moderate income persons by:

53 1) Preventing or eliminating slums or neighborhood blight. 2) Rehabilitation of Substandard Owner Occupied Housing 3) Infrastructure needs met in the target area The following is a brief list of the projects funded through the City of Dover CDBG program from previous funding years to demonstrate the range of activities covered by the program:  From 2008 to 2009 there were 12 owner occupied homes rehabilitated to meet standards of the City Housing Code under the Homeowner Rehabilitation Assistance Program.  From 2000 to 2010, down payment and settlement assistance was provided to a total of 72 first time home buyers who are low to moderate income persons through the Dover First Start Program.  In 2007, CDBG funds were used to rehabilitate 5 residential rental units in the Downtown Target Area in which one unit has been made handicap accessible and all units’ service low to moderate income persons.  In 2007 and 2008, Connections Community Support Program was provided a grant for operating cost to provide meals and furnishings for 10 Easy Access 2 Permanent Housing residents who were seeking support to break the cycle of chronic homelessness. Funding was also provided for motel vouchers to provide temporary housing to homeless persons.  From 2005 to 2010, the First State Resource Development Council has provided quality emergency home repairs to 36 homeowners eliminating conditions that constitute health and safety hazards. Target Block Program: The purpose of the target block approach is to concentrate resources available to the public, private, and non-profit sectors for housing programs in a specific area (known as the Target Area). The Target Area consists of one of Dover’s oldest working class neighborhoods located in west central Downtown. This concentrated approach is to insure the likelihood of an immediate visual impact and long- term stabilizing effect of each area. The major element of the Target Block Program will be concentrated home-to-home internal inspection to determining deficiencies which need to be corrected. Substandard housing requiring plumbing, electrical update to meet the Dover Building Code, but which is basically sound and suitable for rehabilitation has been targeted. A sufficient number of low and moderate income families must reside in the area.

54 Inclusionary Zoning: Unlike many communities, Dover has not practiced “exclusionary zoning” were most of the undeveloped land is designated for large lot single family detached homes. To the contrary, Dover’s Comprehensive Land Development Plan designates a large portion of undeveloped lands for moderate density housing, and a smaller but significant portion for high density housing. The land is subsequently zoned accordingly, permitting a range of residential densities and housing types. The City of Dover Zoning Ordinance includes two provisions promoting mixed residential developments. The first called the Planned Neighborhood Design Option encourages superior site design by relaxing bulk standards, requiring more open space and recreational areas, permitting various housing styles in all zones, and providing incentives to mix housing types to encourage less homogeneous development patterns. Accessory apartments associated with single family residences are permitted if certain design criteria are met. Density bonuses for community features (such as neighborhood commercial uses or day care centers) are offered. Although there are no direct requirements for affordable housing or subsidized units, clearly these types of units could easily be accommodated within these style developments. Four PND developments under construction are currently pending promise to offer over a variety of new housing units including single family detached, townhouses, duplexes, and apartment units. The second provision for mixed use development is the Traditional Neighborhood Design Zone. This zoning classification was adopted in November of 2004. As stated in the ordinance, “the intent of the Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) zone is to create a walkable and pedestrian friendly, economically viable professional, commercial and mixed use residential neighborhood for people of different ages and incomes that draw from the best architectural and community design features of Delaware and the Delmarva Peninsula.” The TND encourages greater integration of land uses and diversity of lot sizes. There are no direct requirements for affordable housing or subsidized units however; these types of units could be accommodated within this style of development. One TND project is currently under construction. Proactive Code Enforcement: The City of Dover has adopted the 2009 ICC International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) as its Housing Code and has four full time Code Enforcement Officers dedicated to enforcing the provisions of the IPMC and other provisions of the Dover Code. The Officers work throughout the City, but has concentrated efforts on the older neighborhoods in west central Dover. Code Enforcement Staff routinely inspect rental dwelling units to ensure that they meet the requirements of the IPMC. Inspections typically include all exterior and interior structural members, heating, plumbing, and venting systems, space requirements, sanitary facilities and exterior property maintenance. 3. PRIVATE RESOURCES For-Profit In the for-profit area the major resources for housing will be local lending institutions that are looking for quality housing projects (Ownership and rental) to support in conjunction

55 with their requirement to comply with the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). Several local banking institutions in response to CRA requirements have joined together to form the Delaware Community Investment Council. The Council will provide low-interest loans to non-profits for developing affordable housing. Favorable mortgage lending terms for projects not typically financed that are in areas under-served by local financial institutions will be the primary resource expected. Non-Profit There are several non-profit foundations that serve the Dover area and have established housing, and housing related services as priorities for their annual or semi-annual grants. Among them are the following: Delaware Community Foundation Crystal Trust Milton and Hattie Kutz Foundation Gannett Communities Funds In addition to non-profit foundations there are several non-profit organizations that provide housing or housing related services. For example the National Council on Agricultural Life and Labor Research Fund, Inc. (NCALL) provides comprehensive home ownership counseling services and technical assistance to non-profits involved with the HOME program and Central Delaware Habitat for Humanity and Dover’s First Start Home Ownership Down Payment and Settlement Program. VI.4 ACTION PLAN GOALS The following are the five year goals that will be implemented from the Consolidated Plan. 1. Provide aid to special needs persons. 2. Preserve the existing housing stock in the City. 3. Encourage owner occupied housing in low to moderate income areas 4. Provide decent and safe neighborhoods 5. Aid economic opportunity in low to moderate income areas. VI.5 ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN The following activities are to be funded by the City of Dover Community Development Office for Fiscal year 2010.

56 Project 1 Homeownership Assistance Program CDBG Funds will be used to provide settlement assistance to low to moderate income persons to purchase homes in the City of Dover. Total Funding……………………………………………………$40,000.00 Project 2 Homeowner Rehabilitation Assistance Program CDBG funds will be used to rehabilitate qualified owner/occupied homes found in violation of the City’s Housing Code. Total Funding…………………………………………………… $48,000.00 Project 3 Program Administration CDBG Funds will be used to oversee management, monitoring and coordination of the CDBG program in the City of Dover. Total Funding…………………………………………………… $56,858.00 Project 4 Habitat for Humanity CDBG funds will be used to renovate a single family residential home that will provide affordable housing to a low income family. Total Funding…………………………………………………. $32,000.00 Project 5 Connections Community Support Program CDBG funds will be used to provide motel vouchers to homeless individuals and families who have no other immediate housing alternatives. Total Funding………………………………………………….. $12,000.00 Project 6 First State Resource Conservation and Development Council (RC&D) CDBG funds will be used to assist very low income homeowners with emergency repairs to eliminate severe housing conditions that constitute health and safety hazards. Project Funding…………………………………………………… $32,000.00 Project 7 Community Revitalization Infrastructure CDBG Funds will address the infrastructure needs of the qualifying census tract areas with the reconstruction of the streets and curbs.

57 Total Funding……………………………………………………… $63,434.00 Total CDBG grant funding………………………………………………… $284,292.00

58 VI.6 MAPS OF DOVER The following maps depict the City of Dover. Map II-1 City of Dover Census Tracts and Block Groups This map shows the various Census Tracts and Census Block Groups in the City of Dover area. The Tracts and Blocks are numbered for easy reference to sections of the text which mention specific tract and block numbers. Map II - 2 City of Dover Areas of Minority Concentration This map shows the areas where minorities are concentrated in the City of Dover. Map II - 3 City of Dover Low to Moderate Income Areas This map shows Dover's low to moderate income areas, based on the 2000 US Census Block Groups. HUD has designated that for Dover, areas with more than a 51% population of low to moderate income persons qualify for area benefit activities. The block groups with 51% low to moderate income population or greater are shown in yellow on Map II - 3.

59 Map II-1 City of Dover Census Tracts and Block Groups

60 Map II - 2 City of Dover Areas of Minority Concentration

61 Map II - 3 City of Dover Low to Moderate Income Areas

62 VI.7 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Project 10-1 – Homeownership Assistance Program Citywide Project 10-2 – Homeowner Rehabilitation Assistance Program This project will be available citywide to low to moderate income residents of Dover. Project 10-3 - Program Administration Citywide Project 10- 4 – Habitat for Humanity West Dover Project 10-5 – Connections Community Support Program Citywide Project 10- 6 – First State Resource Conservation and Development Council Citywide Project 10-7 – Community Revitalization Infrastructure Citywide VI.8 SERVICE DELIVERY AND MANAGEMENT The City of Dover Community Development Office will assume overall responsibility for the implementation of the Action Plan. In addition, the Community Development Office will directly manage and administer the City of Dover Housing Rehabilitation Grant Program and the Home Ownership Grant Program. NCALL will provide home ownership counseling directly to low and moderate income home buyers in Dover. The City of Dover Public Services Department will implement the Infrastructure Revitalization project through the procurement process.

63 VI.9 HUD FUNDED HOMELESS AND OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS ACTIVITIES At the present time, there are three scattered site neighborhood homes that have been developed by the Alliance for the Mentally Ill in Delaware. These homes provide housing for persons who are very low chronically mentally ill. The homes have been funded through the HUD Section 202 Program so that the residents pay 30% of their adjusted gross income for rent and utilities. The homes have project based rent subsidies. The Delaware HIV Consortium’s HOPWA (Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS) program. The consortium entered into a contract with the Delaware State Housing Authority to provide tenant based rental assistance to people with HIV/AIDS in the State of Delaware. This program is now fully operational statewide. Clients are referred to the program by staff from agencies that provide HIV case management services such as Kent County Counseling Services and the Division of Public Health Offices in Dover. In Kent County, the program currently provides rental assistance to approximately 35 families and has an additional waiting list of 270 families. Because the demand for the program is greater than can be met, staff encourages all program participants and potential program participants to apply for alternate forms of subsidized housing through such avenues as Dover Housing Authority and the Delaware State Housing Authority. VI.10 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION The following is the resolution that will be submitted for adoption by the Dover City Council on June 28, 2010 to approve the Application for Federal Assistance for fiscal year 2010, the 2010 Action Plan and the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan.

64 City of Dover MAYOR AND COUNCIL DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2010-04 A RESOLUTION PROPOSING APPROVAL OF THE 2010-2014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSOLIDATED PLAN. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Dover is entitled to $296,526 through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant program; and WHEREAS, the City of Dover has prepared the 2010–2014 Consolidated Plan, in accordance with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development guidelines, that serves as the primary planning document for identifying and meeting the housing and community development needs for the low and moderate-income residents of Dover; and WHEREAS, the City of Dover is in favor of utilizing the Community Development Block Grant funds for the community development purposes in accordance with the National Community Development objectives of benefiting low and moderate income families, eliminating slums and blight, and meeting other community development objectives; and WHEREAS, the United State Department of Housing and Urban Development requires the City of Dover to submit a Consolidated Plan and an Action Plan for Application for Federal Assistance including the proposed use of funds and including certain certifications and policies to obtain its $296,526 entitlement; and use of $10,292 in program income for eligible activities; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER APPROVE THE 2010 – 2014 Consolidated Plan and application for Federal Assistance included in the Action Plan, along certifications and policies attached, and authorize its forwarding to the United States Department of Urban Development for consideration. ______________________________ ______________________________ CARLETON E. CAREY SR. KENNETH L. HOGAN MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT

65 SUMMARY OF CITIZEN COMMENTS The City of Dover encourages citizen participation in the Consolidated Plan development process. Citizen participation invitations to the development of the Consolidated Plan were advertised in the city’s local newspaper, the City’s website and mailed to interested parties. Public Notice and meetings for the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan were as follows: - November 19, 2009, a public meeting was held to discuss the development of the Five Year Consolidated Plan. - January 7, 2010, a public meeting was held to determine the needs of the community and the development of the Consolidated Plan. There were 20 people in attendance for this meeting. On January 7, 2010 a public meeting was held to discuss the development process of the Consolidated Plan as well as determine the needs of the community. There were 20 people in attendance. Attendees were asked to complete a community development needs survey to determine the priority needs of the community. Although there were 20 people in attendance, only 7 people participated in the survey. Following a presentation of the Consolidated Plan process, topics of discussion included: a) allocating more funding to assist people with special needs, b) continue to support the housing rehabilitation and homeownership assistance programs and c) provide community policing in the target area and repair the infrastructure in qualifying census tract areas. - May 11, 2010 a public hearing was held to afford the citizens to comment on the Draft Consolidated Plan and the 2010 Action Plan. There was no one in attendance. Public Notice The City of Dover Community Development Office will be holding a public hearing Tuesday, May 11, 2010 at 5:30 pm in the City Hall Council Chambers to afford the citizens an opportunity to comment on the draft five year Consolidated Plan 2010-2014, and the draft FY 2010 Action Plan. The plan will be submitted to the U. S. Department of Housing & Urban Development no later than June 16, 2010. The Consolidated Plan serves as the housing planning document for the city and the Action Plan serves as an application for funding for the Community Development Block Program. The city will consider any comments or views of citizens received in writing or orally at the public hearing. A summary of these comments or views and summary of any comments or views not accepted and reasons therefore, shall be attached to the final plan. If you have a vision, hearing, or physical impairment that requires accommodations either in the reading of this notice or at the public hearing noted above, the city will provide appropriate assistance. Please call (302) 736-7175 to schedule assistance, and for hearing impaired, TDD (302) 739-7428 between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:00 pm Monday through Friday.

66 Certifications VII. I General Certifications In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the Consolidated Plan regulations, the jurisdiction certifies that: Affirmatively Further Fair Housing -- The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing, which means it will conduct an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting that analysis and actions in this regard prepare an analysis of impediments and maintain records pertaining to carrying out this certification. Anti-Discrimination -- The grants will be conducted and administered in compliance with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-3620), the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Executive Orders 11063, 11625, 12138, 12432 and 12892, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), the Americans with Disabilities Act (title II) and implementing regulations. Anti-displacement and Relocation Plan -- It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, as required under §570.606(b) and Federal implementing regulations; and that it has in effect and is following a residential anti displacement and relocation assistance plan required under section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and the relocation requirements of §570.606(c) governing optional relocation assistance under section 105(a)(11) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended; Drug Free Workplace -- It will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: 1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; 2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about (a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (b) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;

67 (c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; 3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1; 4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will - (a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; 5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; 6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted - (a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; 7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. 8. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant:

68 Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) Dover City Hall 15 East Loockerman Street Dover, DE 19901 Check if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here; the certification with regard to the drug-free workplace required by 24 CFR part 24, subpart F. Anti-Lobbying -- To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief: 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and 3. It will require that the language of paragraph (n) of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub-grants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. The jurisdiction is in compliance with restrictions on lobbying required by 24 CFR part 87, together with disclosure forms, if required by that part.

69 Legal Authority -- It possesses legal authority under State and local law to make grant submissions and to execute a community development and housing programs and the jurisdiction's governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act a resolution, motion or similar action authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the grantee to submit the housing and community development plan and amendments thereto and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the grantee to act in connection with the submission of the housing and community development plan and to provide such additional information as may be required; Applicable Laws -- The jurisdiction will comply with the other provisions of the Acts covering programs covered by the HCD plan and with other applicable laws. Signature Date Title

70 VII.2 Specific CDBG Certifications The Entitlement Community certifies that: Use of Funds -- It has developed its HCD plan one-year projected use of funds so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; (the projected use of funds may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available); except that the aggregate use of CDBG funds received under section 106 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and if applicable, under section 108 of the same Act, during program year(s) 2010-2014 (a period specified by the grantee consisting of one, two, or three specific consecutive program years), shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less than 70 percent of such funds are used for activities that benefit such persons during such period; Community Development Plan -- It has developed a community development plan, for the period specified in the paragraph above, that identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short and long-term community development objectives that have been developed in accordance with the primary objective and requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended; Special Assessments -- It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted in whole or in part with funds provided under section 106 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, or with amounts resulting from a guarantee under section 108 of the same Act by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements, unless: 1. Funds received under section 106 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, are used to pay the proportion of such fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of such public improvements that are financed from revenue sources other than under Title I of that Act; or 2. For purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of moderate income, the grantee certifies to the Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received under section 106 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, to comply with the requirements of subparagraph (1) above; Lead-Based Paint -- Its notification, inspection, testing and abatement procedures concerning lead-based paint will comply with §570.608;

71 Excessive Force -- It has adopted and is enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non- violent civil rights demonstrations; and 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction; Signature Date Title

72 VII. 3 APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING LOBBYING AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS: A. Lobbying Certification This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. B. Drug-Free Workplace Certification 1. By signing and/or submitting this application or grant agreement, the grantee is providing the certification set out in paragraph (o). 2. The certification set out in paragraph (o) is a material representation of fact upon which reliance is placed when the agency awards the grant. If it is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered a false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act, HUD, in addition to any other remedies available to the Federal Government, may take action authorized under the Drug-Free Workplace Act. 3. For grantees other than individuals, Alternate I applies. (This is the information to which entitlement grantees certify). 4. For grantees who are individuals, Alternate II applies. (Not applicable to CDBG Entitlement grantees.) 5. Workplaces under grants, for grantees other than individuals, need not be identified on the certification. If known, they may be identified in the grant application. If the grantee does not identify the workplaces at the time of application, or upon award, if there is no application, the grantee must keep the identity of the workplace(s) on file in its office and make the information available for Federal inspection. Failure to identify all known workplaces constitutes a violation of the grantee's drug-free workplace requirements. 6. Workplace identifications must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the grant takes place.

73 Categorical descriptions may be used (e.g., all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio stations). 7. If the workplace identified to the agency changes during the performance of the grant, the grantee shall inform the agency of the change(s), if it previously identified the workplaces in question (see paragraph five). 8. Definitions of terms in the Non procurement Suspension and Debarment common rule and Drug-Free Workplace common rule apply to this certification. Grantees' attention is called, in particular, to the following definitions from these rules: "Controlled substance" means a controlled substance in Schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.812) and as further defined by regulation (21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15); "Conviction" means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes; "Criminal drug statute" means a Federal or non-Federal criminal statute involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, use, or possession of any controlled substance; "Employee" means the employee of a grantee directly engaged in the performance of work under a grant, including: (i) All "direct charge" employees; (ii) all "indirect charge" employees unless their impact or involvement is insignificant to the performance of the grant; and (iii) temporary personnel and consultants who are directly engaged in the performance of work under the grant and who are not on the grantee's payroll. This definition does not include workers not on the payroll of the grantee (e.g., volunteers, even if used to meet a matching requirement; consultants or independent contractors not on the grantee's payroll; or employees of subrecipients or subcontractors in covered workplace.

74 VIII DEFINITIONS Certification. A written assertion, based on supporting evidence, that must be kept available for inspection by HUD, by the Inspector General of HUD, and by the public. The assertion shall be deemed to be accurate unless HUD determines otherwise, after inspecting the evidence and providing due notice and opportunity for comment. Consolidated plan (or "the plan"). The document that is submitted to HUD that serves as the planning document (comprehensive housing affordability strategy and community development plan) of the jurisdiction and an application for funding under any of the Community Planning and Development formula grant programs (CDBG, ESG, HOME, or HOPWA), which is prepared in accordance with the process prescribed in this part. Consortium. An organization of geographically contiguous units of general local government that are acting as a single unit of general local government for purposes of the HOME program (see 24 CFR part 92). Cost burden. The extent to which gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceed 30 percent of gross income, based on data available from the U.S. Census Bureau. Emergency shelter. Any facility with overnight sleeping accommodations, the primary purpose of which is to provide temporary shelter for the homeless in general or for specific populations of the homeless. Extremely low-income family. Family whose income is between 0 and 30 percent of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD with adjustments for smaller and larger families, except that HUD may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 30 percent of the median for the area on the basis of HUD's findings that such variations are necessary because of prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents, or unusually high or low family incomes. Homeless family with children. A family composed of the following types of homeless persons: at least one parent or guardian and one child under the age of 18; a pregnant woman; or a person in the process of securing legal custody of a person under the age of 18. Homeless person. A youth (17 years or younger) not accompanied by an adult (18 years or older) or an adult without children, who is homeless (not imprisoned or otherwise detained pursuant to an Act of Congress or a State law), including the following: (1) An individual who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence; and (2) An individual who has a primary nighttime residence that is:

75 (i) A supervised publicly or privately operated shelter designed to provide temporary living accommodations (including welfare hotels, congregate shelters, and transitional housing for the mentally ill); (ii) An institution that provides a temporary residence for individuals intended to be institutionalized; or (iii) A public or private place not designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings. Homeless subpopulations. Include but are not limited to the following categories of homeless persons: severely mentally ill only, alcohol/drug addicted only, severely mentally ill and alcohol/drug addicted, fleeing domestic violence, youth, and persons with HIV/AIDS. Jurisdiction. A State or unit of general local government. Large family. Family of five or more persons. Lead-based paint hazards. Any condition that causes exposure to lead from lead- contaminated dust, lead-contaminated soil, lead-contaminated paint that is deteriorated or present in accessible surfaces, friction surfaces, or impact surfaces that would result in adverse human health effects as established by the appropriate Federal agency. Low-income families. Low-income families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of the median family income for the area, as determined by HUD with adjustments for smaller and larger families, except that HUD may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 50 percent of the median for the area on the basis of HUD's findings that such variations are necessary because of prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents, or unusually high or low family incomes. Middle-income family. Family whose income is between 80 percent and 95 percent of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for smaller and larger families, except that HUD may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 95 percent of the median for the area on the basis of HUD's findings that such variations are necessary because of prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents, or unusually high or low family incomes. (This corresponds to the term "moderate income family" under the CHAS statute, 42 U.S.C. 12705.) Moderate-income family. Family whose income does not exceed 80 percent of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD with adjustments for smaller and larger families, except that HUD may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 80 percent of the median for the area on the basis of HUD's findings that such variations are necessary because of prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents, or unusually high or low family incomes.

76 Overcrowding. For purposes of describing relative housing needs, a housing unit containing more than one person per room, as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, for which data are made available by the Census Bureau. (See 24 CFR 791.402(b).) Person with a disability. A person who is determined to: (1) Have a physical, mental or emotional impairment that: (i) Is expected to be of long-continued and indefinite duration; (ii) Substantially impedes his or her ability to live independently; and (iii) Is of such a nature that the ability could be improved by more suitable housing conditions; or (2) Have a developmental disability, as defined in section 102(7) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6001-6007); or (3) Be the surviving member or members of any family that had been living in an assisted unit with the deceased member of the family who had a disability at the time of his or her death. Poverty level family. Family with an income below the poverty line, as defined by the Office of Management and Budget and revised annually. Severe cost burden. The extent to which gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceed 50 percent of gross income, based on data available from the U.S. Census Bureau. State. Any State of the United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Transitional housing. A project that is designed to provide housing and appropriate supportive services to homeless persons to facilitate movement to independent living within 24 months, or a longer period approved by HUD. For purposes of the HOME program, there is no HUD- approved time period for moving to independent living. Unit of general local government. A city, town, township, county, parish, village, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State; an urban county; and a consortium of such political subdivisions recognized by HUD in accordance with the HOME program (24 CFR part 92) or the CDBG program (24 CFR part 570).

77 IX MONITORING IX 1 General Procedures Monitoring is basically a review of programs, projects and activities administrative procedures as an on-going process that is implemented. When a sub-recipient receives notification of grant award the process continues through invoices, monthly report submittal, and one site visit\ including activity closeout. The monitoring reports are used to determine the process and identification problems. Staff reviews the reports with the sub-recipient and suggests changes and/or modifications as needed. If issues are identified, staff makes specific recommendations for addressing the problems and identifies action that must be taken and a deadline is included in the monitoring letter.

DOVER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2009 ANNUAL REPORT

June 14, 2010 Mayor and City Council PO Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Dear Mayor Carey and members of City Council: The members of the Dover Fire Department experienced a challenging year for 2009 and although the economy is still not at its best, we are looking forward to a better 2010. The year started out with the continuation of Haggerty and Haggerty Recommendation Committee Meetings with the goal of finding a solution to address the needs of the DFD and continue the excellent partnership with the City of Dover and members of City Council. This month also brought the discontinuation of the Kent County Special Operations due to the inability to financially support or manage the program. In February, the Fire Marshal Investigation Units were relocated to Station 1 allowing proper storage and faster deployment of the units due to a centralized location. Carter Knotts retired in March after 28 years of service leaving a vacant position in the Fire Chief’s Office. This position was temporarily filled by Dispatcher Osika and Dispatcher Carey was temporarily placed in the rotating shift schedule. In April, the first of two Firefighter’s Night Out (Can you take the heat) events took place. These events were held to give City Council and Department Heads a first hand experience of volunteer firefighter. The design of a new fire alarm activation report was started to allow the Fire Marshal’s Office a better way to mitigate and track activations. In May, City Council accepted the recommendations of the Haggerty and Haggerty Joint Committee Meetings as a way to improve the working relationship between City Council and the Fire Department. July was a month of transition for the Dover Fire Department with the resignation of several officers. The resignations included Chief Strochine, and Assistant Chiefs Glenn Whitt, Jason Osika, and Derek Larson. 103 South Governors Avenue ● Dover, Delaware 19904 Headquarters: (302) 736-7168 ● Fire Chief’s Office: (302) 736-7167 ● FAX: (302) 736-7166

The Delaware Volunteer Firefighters Association Annual Conference took place in September. This conference offers various fire and medical seminars with guest speakers from around the country. Fire Prevention Week is in October and members of the Dover Fire Department were able to reach out to over 3,000 children within our fire district. Due to an increase in kitchen fires, Mayor Carey and the DFD held a joint press conference to demonstrate how to properly extinguish a fire on a stove and explained the dangers of unattended cooking. Due to poor weather conditions in December, the Annual Operation Santa was cancelled. In 2009, the Fire Department saw a 42% reduction in State Funding and we don’t anticipate an increase for the following year. Although the year has been difficult, we will continue to provide superior fire & rescue services to the citizens of the City of Dover and surrounding areas. Sincerely, Sean P.M. Christiansen Chief of Department 103 South Governors Avenue ● Dover, Delaware 19904 Headquarters: (302) 736-7168 ● Fire Chief’s Office: (302) 736-7167 ● FAX: (302) 736-7166

Dover Fire Districts Leipsic Cheswold 2 Dover 1 Little Creek Hartly Dover Air Force Base Legend Dover Fire Districts Kent County Fire Districts Dover Air Force Base Camden-Wyoming City Boundary Roads Rivers & Streams Water Bodies 1 inch = 7,450 feet Magnolia Date Printed: June 4, 2010 Date Created: June 4, 2010 File: m:\gis_data\projects\tech_mxds \fire_districts_8x11 Department: Public Services GIS City of Dover, DE Bowers Felton

FIRE INCIDENTS FOR 2009 REPORT CONTAINS STATION 1 AND STATION 2 Date FDID Incident# Alarm Street # Address Suite Type 01/01/2009 30046 2009-000001 02:41 39 Primreose Dr. Fires in structure other than in a building 01/01/2009 30046 2009-000002 09:34 317 ALDER RD Carbon monoxide incident 01/01/2009 30046 2009-000003 19:39 IAO KENTON RD / W DENNY'S RD No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 01/02/2009 30046 2009-000004 08:38 1231 N Dupont Hwy False alarm or false call, other 01/02/2009 30046 2009-000005 13:30 260 BEISER BLVD. Good intent call, other 01/02/2009 30046 2009-000006 14:36 908 WOODCREST DR 3-10 Good intent call, other 01/02/2009 30046 2009-000007 18:54 986 WHATCOAT DR Passenger vehicle fire 01/03/2009 30046 2009-000008 10:59 3000 LEMAY LA BLD C Water or steam leak 01/03/2009 30046 2009-000009 15:10 2898 ARTHURSVILLE RD Cover assignment, standby, moveup 01/03/2009 30046 2009-000010 16:41 1011 BAY RD Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 01/05/2009 30046 2009-000011 02:51 561 N DUPONT HWY Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 01/05/2009 30046 2009-000012 06:40 200 BANNING ST False alarm or false call, other 01/06/2009 30046 2009-000014 16:21 337 ALDER RD EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 01/07/2009 30046 2009-000015 18:53 400 COURT ST Smoke scare, odor of smoke 01/07/2009 30046 2009-000016 21:25 612 Pear St Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 01/09/2009 30046 2009-000017 18:28 115 WILLIS RD Passenger vehicle fire 01/09/2009 30046 2009-000018 19:03 245 S DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 01/10/2009 30046 2009-000019 02:25 611 FOREST ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 01/10/2009 30046 2009-000020 19:46 500 PERSIMMON TREE LA 223 Cooking fire, confined to container 01/11/2009 30046 2009-000021 10:42 211 DELAWARE AVE Good intent call, other 01/11/2009 30046 2009-000022 17:11 74 PAR HAVEN DRIVE BLD H 23 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 01/12/2009 30046 2009-000023 09:34 1832 N DUPONT HWY Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 01/12/2009 30046 2009-000024 13:32 1030 FORREST AVE Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 01/12/2009 30046 2009-000025 17:05 944 BOGGS DRIVE Cooking fire, confined to container 01/12/2009 30046 2009-000026 18:22 320 KESSELRING AVE. CO detector activation due to malfunction

01/12/2009 30046 2009-000027 18:29 315 BILLY MITCHELL LANE Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 01/14/2009 30046 2009-000028 13:10 640 S STATE ST Building fire 01/14/2009 30046 2009-000029 21:11 S STATE ST & HOPE ST Rescue, EMS incident, other 01/14/2009 30046 2009-000030 22:58 39 N NEW ST Heat from short circuit (wiring), defective/worn 01/16/2009 30046 2009-000031 00:39 3098 N DUPONT HWY Building fire 01/16/2009 30046 2009-000032 01:47 21 MUIRFIELD CT Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 01/16/2009 30046 2009-000033 02:36 34 STARLIFTER AVE Good intent call, other 01/16/2009 30046 2009-000034 06:47 DAFB MAIN GATE Person in distress, other 01/16/2009 30046 2009-000035 10:08 310 BILLY MITCHELL LA F 202 Cooking fire, confined to container 01/16/2009 30046 2009-000036 15:57 139 COOPER RD Building fire 01/16/2009 30046 2009-000037 17:58 SPRUANCE RD Smoke scare, odor of smoke 01/16/2009 30046 2009-000038 19:33 263 NORTHDOWN DR Toxic condition, other 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000039 04:47 1780 N DUPONT HWY Water or steam leak 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000040 05:01 216 N STATE ST Carbon monoxide incident 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000041 05:57 103 PERIWINKLE DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000042 07:44 655 FAIRFIELD INN Cooking fire, confined to container 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000043 12:01 411 LEGISLATIVE AVE Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000044 13:18 21 NORTH STATE STREET Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000045 13:22 430 COLLEGE ROAD Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000046 13:55 430 COLLEGE ROAD Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000047 14:18 684 FOREST STREET Water or steam leak 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000048 16:02 2735 FOREST AVE Water or steam leak 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000049 16:27 191 NORTH DUPONT HIGHWAY Water or steam leak 01/17/2009 30046 2009-000050 23:26 43 MER WAY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 01/18/2009 30046 2009-000051 00:52 353 RUSTIC LA Building fire 01/18/2009 30046 2009-000052 01:55 51 WEBBS LA Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 01/18/2009 30046 2009-000053 02:07 807 TOWNSEND BLVD Water or steam leak 01/18/2009 30046 2009-000054 11:18 1704 E LEBANON RD Water problem, other

01/18/2009 30046 2009-000055 14:51 2574 FORREST AVE Building fire 01/19/2009 30046 2009-000056 02:20 1080 SILVER LAKE BLVD Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 01/19/2009 30046 2009-000057 16:59 425 N DUPONT HWY Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 01/19/2009 30046 2009-000058 20:44 WEST STREET Good intent call, other 01/20/2009 30046 2009-000059 09:18 30 OLD RUDNICK LA Cooking fire, confined to container 01/20/2009 30046 2009-000060 15:34 407 DOGWOOD AVE CO detector activation due to malfunction 01/20/2009 30046 2009-000061 17:51 111 S. New St Telephone, malicious false alarm 01/21/2009 30046 2009-000062 01:21 203 SHEPPARD STREET Fire in mobile home used as fixed residence 01/21/2009 30046 2009-000063 03:29 1165 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 01/21/2009 30046 2009-000064 07:47 SR1 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 01/21/2009 30046 2009-000065 13:07 141 BERTRAND DR Good intent call, other 01/21/2009 30046 2009-000066 15:47 107 New St Fires in structure other than in a building 01/21/2009 30046 2009-000067 18:21 80 KENTWOOD DR Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 01/21/2009 30046 2009-000068 23:40 COURT ST Good intent call, other 01/22/2009 30046 2009-000069 05:06 M/M SR1 & M/M 95 Steam, other gas mistaken for smoke, other 01/22/2009 30046 2009-000070 10:08 884 WALKER RD Extinguishing system activation 01/22/2009 30046 2009-000071 18:48 892 WOODCREST DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 01/22/2009 30046 2009-000072 19:43 1420 MCKEE RD Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 01/22/2009 30046 2009-000073 21:25 2735 FORREST AVE Water or steam leak 01/22/2009 30046 2009-000074 23:42 860 PAUL ST Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 01/23/2009 30046 2009-000075 11:42 1548 TARALIA RD Cultivated vegetation, crop fire, other 01/23/2009 30046 2009-000076 15:11 32 S GOVERNORS AVE HazMat release investigation w/no HazMat 01/24/2009 30046 2009-000077 02:39 1434 S Farmview Dr. Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 01/24/2009 30046 2009-000078 16:37 727 MAPLE PARKWAY Water or steam leak 01/25/2009 30046 2009-000079 01:31 118 WEST DIVISION STREET Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 01/25/2009 30046 2009-000080 18:43 502 ROBERTA AVE Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 01/26/2009 30046 2009-000081 15:54 534 Central Church Rd Dispatched & canceled en route 01/26/2009 30046 2009-000082 20:26 114 THAMES DR Public service

01/27/2009 30046 2009-000083 15:21 69 TRANSPORTATION CIRCLE Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 01/29/2009 30046 2009-000084 16:52 1080 SILVER LAKE BLVD Malicious, mischievous false call, other 01/29/2009 30046 2009-000085 20:43 766 VICTORY CHAPEL RD Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue 01/29/2009 30046 2009-000086 22:03 609 RIVER RD Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 01/30/2009 30046 2009-000087 03:24 177 WILLIS RD Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 01/30/2009 30046 2009-000088 17:51 956 WHATCOAT DR 12 Cooking fire, confined to container 01/30/2009 30046 2009-000089 23:26 3282 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 01/31/2009 30046 2009-000090 23:59 411 S QUEEN ST 207 Cooking fire, confined to container 02/02/2009 30046 2009-000091 18:46 391 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 02/02/2009 30046 2009-000092 20:50 232 N GOVERNORS BLVD Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire confined 02/03/2009 30046 2009-000093 12:56 411 REED ST Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 02/04/2009 30046 2009-000094 00:25 950 WHATCOAT DR Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 02/04/2009 30046 2009-000095 13:41 391 N DUPONT HWY Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 02/05/2009 30046 2009-000096 05:04 1365 N DUPONT HWY Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 02/06/2009 30046 2009-000097 15:57 196 COMMERCE WAY Water or steam leak 02/06/2009 30046 2009-000098 17:10 16 N GOVERNORS AVE Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 02/06/2009 30046 2009-000099 19:49 235 W LOOCKERMAN ST Telephone, malicious false alarm 02/07/2009 30046 2009-000100 11:22 16 CLARA ST System malfunction, other 02/07/2009 30046 2009-000101 12:00 381 RITA WILMA RD Water or steam leak 02/07/2009 30046 2009-000102 14:45 18 GREENHILL AVE Cooking fire, confined to container 02/08/2009 30046 2009-000103 03:06 1700 N DUPONT HWY J Building fire 02/08/2009 30046 2009-000104 03:25 3282 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 02/08/2009 30046 2009-000105 21:21 184 WILLIS RD Passenger vehicle fire 02/08/2009 30046 2009-000106 21:53 1706 N DUPONT HWY Water or steam leak 02/09/2009 30046 2009-000107 15:52 1030 FORREST AVE Grass fire 02/09/2009 30046 2009-000108 18:51 150 SAULSBURY RD HazMat release investigation w/no HazMat 02/10/2009 30046 2009-000109 18:53 120 GREENHILL AVE Good intent call, other 02/10/2009 30046 2009-000110 19:55 950 N STATE ST Water & ice-related rescue, other

02/10/2009 30046 2009-000111 22:30 200 BANNING ST Good intent call, other 02/11/2009 30046 2009-000112 18:27 1137 S STATE ST Outside rubbish fire, other 02/11/2009 30046 2009-000113 19:31 2168 FORREST AVE Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 02/12/2009 30046 2009-000114 13:57 600 JEFFERIC BLVD Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 02/12/2009 30046 2009-000115 14:14 59 BADGERS LAIR DR Cultivated grain or crop fire 02/12/2009 30046 2009-000116 16:00 102 N GOVERNORS AVE Grass fire 02/12/2009 30046 2009-000117 17:35 3282 N DUPONT HWY Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 02/13/2009 30046 2009-000118 12:01 1070 CHESTNUT GROVE RD Outside storage fire 02/13/2009 30046 2009-000119 12:12 KENTON RD F/O COURTSIDE Fires in structure other than in a building 02/13/2009 30046 2009-000120 12:58 110 HAMAN DR Grass fire 02/13/2009 30046 2009-000121 21:28 820 CARVEL DR J-7 Building fire 02/13/2009 30046 2009-000122 22:48 950 WHATCOAT DR 24 Cooking fire, confined to container 02/14/2009 30046 2009-000123 13:37 1571 PEACHTREE RUN Cover assignment, standby, moveup 02/14/2009 30046 2009-000124 19:45 35 MORIARTY ST Cooking fire, confined to container 02/15/2009 30046 2009-000125 06:58 1706 N DUPONT HWY Cooking fire, confined to container 02/15/2009 30046 2009-000126 15:34 51 WEBBS LA Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 02/16/2009 30046 2009-000127 00:50 171 WESTMINSTER DR Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 02/16/2009 30046 2009-000128 01:05 910 WHATCOAT DR Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 02/16/2009 30046 2009-000129 02:38 1300 S FARMVIEW DR M HazMat release investigation w/no HazMat 02/16/2009 30046 2009-000130 10:18 1420 MCKEE RD Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 02/16/2009 30046 2009-000131 21:03 956 WHATCOAT DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 02/18/2009 30046 2009-000132 07:21 35 COMMERCE WAY Malicious, mischievous false call, other 02/18/2009 30046 2009-000133 07:53 137 SWEETGUM DR False alarm or false call, other 02/18/2009 30046 2009-000134 08:05 WATER ST BUS STATION Oil or other combustible liquid spill 02/19/2009 30046 2009-000135 10:54 375 S NEW ST False alarm or false call, other 02/19/2009 30046 2009-000136 15:25 700 WALKER RD Trash or rubbish fire, contained 02/19/2009 30046 2009-000137 19:35 910 WHATCOAT DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 02/19/2009 30046 2009-000138 21:39 118 ORCHARD AVE Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire

02/19/2009 30046 2009-000139 23:03 500 PERSIMMON TREE LA Good intent call, other 02/20/2009 30046 2009-000140 00:26 511 MAPLE PKWY Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 02/20/2009 30046 2009-000141 05:05 507 CAROL ST Cooking fire, confined to container 02/20/2009 30046 2009-000142 08:37 100 ENTERPRISE PL Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 02/20/2009 30046 2009-000143 12:37 627 W DIVISION ST Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 02/20/2009 30046 2009-000144 19:52 SR 1 Motor vehicle accident with no injuries. 02/20/2009 30046 2009-000145 20:17 456 E LOOCKERMAN STREET False alarm or false call, other 02/21/2009 30046 2009-000146 04:24 863 MONROE TERRACE Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 02/21/2009 30046 2009-000147 15:01 500 TROON RD Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 02/22/2009 30046 2009-000148 13:21 119 SPRUANCE RD Hazardous condition, other 02/23/2009 30046 2009-000149 09:06 1095 S BRADFORD ST Oil or other combustible liquid spill 02/23/2009 30046 2009-000150 09:22 340 N QUEEN ST System malfunction, other 02/23/2009 30046 2009-000151 14:40 E NORTH ST & S STATE ST Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 02/24/2009 30046 2009-000152 01:18 1200 N DUPONT HWY 3420 Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 02/24/2009 30046 2009-000153 16:13 384 MOCKINGBIRD AVE Cooking fire, confined to container 02/24/2009 30046 2009-000154 16:19 33 SPRUANCE RD Assist police or other governmental agency 02/25/2009 30046 2009-000155 02:18 500 PERSIMMON TREE LA 713 Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire confined 02/25/2009 30046 2009-000156 06:39 1300 S FARMVIEW DR Local alarm system, malicious false alarm 02/25/2009 30046 2009-000157 11:51 151 UPLAND AVE System malfunction, other 02/25/2009 30046 2009-000158 14:28 480 BANK LA Good intent call, other 02/26/2009 30046 2009-000159 04:35 407 DAVID HALL RD Cover assignment, standby, moveup 02/26/2009 30046 2009-000160 07:05 1225 WALKER RD Medical assist, assist EMS crew 02/27/2009 30046 2009-000161 09:09 293 S. SAULSBURY RD Good intent call, other 02/27/2009 30046 2009-000162 15:20 130 S NEW ST Good intent call, other 02/27/2009 30046 2009-000163 16:47 ASBURY AVE Forest, woods or wildland fire 02/28/2009 30046 2009-000164 09:41 255 WEBBS LA Municipal alarm system, malicious false alarm 03/01/2009 30046 2009-000165 19:42 227 CECIL ST Trash or rubbish fire, contained 03/01/2009 30046 2009-000166 22:30 2030 PINE CABIN RD BLDG G Cooking fire, confined to container

03/01/2009 30046 2009-000167 23:41 103 SAXTON RD Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 03/01/2009 30046 2009-000168 23:49 24 Glennwood dr Building fire 03/02/2009 30046 2009-000169 02:54 631 Ridgley st SUITE False alarm or false call, other 03/02/2009 30046 2009-000170 03:01 1565 MCKEE RD System malfunction, other 03/02/2009 30046 2009-000171 12:05 108 S governors blvd Passenger vehicle fire 03/02/2009 30046 2009-000172 22:28 1509 FAWN ST False alarm or false call, other 03/03/2009 30046 2009-000173 15:20 877 WOODCREST DR Passenger vehicle fire 03/03/2009 30046 2009-000174 19:56 561 N DUPONT HWY Water or steam leak 03/04/2009 30046 2009-000175 07:59 1289 WALKER RD BUILDING L Heat from short circuit (wiring), defective/worn 03/04/2009 30046 2009-000176 11:42 1000 HAYES DR Cooking fire, confined to container 03/04/2009 30046 2009-000177 19:02 196 COMMERCE WAY Water problem, other 03/05/2009 30046 2009-000178 13:50 STATE ROUTE 1 Excessive heat, scorch burns with no ignition 03/05/2009 30046 2009-000179 15:09 196 COMMERCE WAY False alarm or false call, other 03/05/2009 30046 2009-000180 17:04 105 KATRINA WAY Water problem, other 03/05/2009 30046 2009-000181 18:01 400 N DUPONT HWY BLDG False alarm or false call, other 03/05/2009 30046 2009-000182 18:11 14 S BRADFORD ST Lock-out 03/05/2009 30046 2009-000183 18:27 1289 WALKER RD BUILD N Service Call, other 03/06/2009 30046 2009-000184 03:51 42 PINE CABIN DR Fire, other 03/06/2009 30046 2009-000185 13:31 109 WOODBROOK RD Building fire 03/06/2009 30046 2009-000186 18:35 245 S DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 03/06/2009 30046 2009-000187 19:34 1706 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 03/06/2009 30046 2009-000188 19:36 216 SOUTH ST Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 03/06/2009 30046 2009-000189 22:24 10 FAIRWAY LAKES DR G-22 Building fire 03/07/2009 30046 2009-000190 14:17 100 HAMAN DR Cooking fire, confined to container 03/07/2009 30046 2009-000191 18:02 310 BILLY MITCHELL LA Cooking fire, confined to container 03/09/2009 30046 2009-000192 11:11 1200 N DUPONT HWY Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 03/10/2009 30046 2009-000193 18:42 210 BAY TREE RD BLD Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 03/11/2009 30046 2009-000194 02:13 600 JEFFERIC BLVD Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional

03/11/2009 30046 2009-000195 09:17 W North St Chemical spill or leak 03/11/2009 30046 2009-000196 15:17 2736 FORREST AVE Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 03/12/2009 30046 2009-000197 13:35 1200 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 03/12/2009 30046 2009-000198 22:31 3282 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 03/13/2009 30046 2009-000199 15:10 FORREST AVE / SALUSBERY RD Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 03/15/2009 30046 2009-000200 02:35 IAO 3282 N. DuPont Hwy Vehicle accident, general cleanup 03/15/2009 30046 2009-000201 16:35 320 RAYMOND ST Cooking fire, confined to container 03/15/2009 30046 2009-000202 17:09 210 BAY TREE RD Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 03/16/2009 30046 2009-000203 03:00 22 OLD RUDNICK LA Good intent call, other 03/16/2009 30046 2009-000204 14:43 411 LEGISLATIVE AVE Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire confined 03/16/2009 30046 2009-000205 20:31 224 BRADLEY RD Passenger vehicle fire 03/17/2009 30046 2009-000206 02:13 472 BARRISTER PL Building fire 03/18/2009 30046 2009-000207 07:36 406 COUNTRY DR Malicious, mischievous false call, other 03/18/2009 30046 2009-000208 11:37 4720 W DENNYS RD Carbon monoxide incident 03/18/2009 30046 2009-000209 14:34 631 RIDGELY ST Malicious, mischievous false call, other 03/18/2009 30046 2009-000210 16:04 E LOOCKERMAN ST Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 03/18/2009 30046 2009-000211 19:03 50 BILLINGS DR Cooking fire, confined to container 03/20/2009 30046 2009-000212 07:50 1121 FORREST AVE Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 03/20/2009 30046 2009-000213 12:46 181 KENTWOOD DR Smoke scare, odor of smoke 03/20/2009 30046 2009-000214 22:07 460 COUNTRY DR Hazardous condition, other 03/21/2009 30046 2009-000215 00:15 255 WEBBS LA Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 03/21/2009 30046 2009-000216 23:46 19 N GOVERNORS AVE False alarm or false call, other 03/22/2009 30046 2009-000217 12:48 908 WOODCREST DR Forest, woods or wildland fire 03/22/2009 30046 2009-000218 17:57 210 BAY TREE RD BLD D Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 03/22/2009 30046 2009-000219 19:57 1365 N DUPONT HWY Grass fire 03/23/2009 30046 2009-000220 08:33 4028 Forest Ave Authorized controlled burning 03/23/2009 30046 2009-000221 14:09 54 VILLAGE DR Building fire 03/23/2009 30046 2009-000222 14:19 BAY ROAD Good intent call, other

03/23/2009 30046 2009-000223 17:44 1300 S FARMVIEW DR Grass fire 03/23/2009 30046 2009-000224 18:07 Bayside Dr Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 03/23/2009 30046 2009-000225 23:53 105 KATRINA WAY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 03/24/2009 30046 2009-000226 04:27 12 DWAYNE CIRCLE Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 03/24/2009 30046 2009-000227 15:20 1 PAT LYNN DR Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 03/24/2009 30046 2009-000228 15:56 120 S GOVERNORS AVE Direct tie to FD, malicious false alarm 03/24/2009 30046 2009-000229 19:38 255 WEBBS LANE Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 03/25/2009 30046 2009-000230 15:58 SALISBURY RD Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 03/25/2009 30046 2009-000231 18:23 1200 N DUPONT HWY Natural vegetation fire, other 03/26/2009 30046 2009-000232 00:06 N dupont hwy Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 03/26/2009 30046 2009-000233 09:46 PEAR ST Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 03/26/2009 30046 2009-000234 12:49 140 S GOVERNORS BLVD Smoke scare, odor of smoke 03/27/2009 30046 2009-000235 09:37 938 S BRADFORD ST Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 03/27/2009 30046 2009-000236 14:03 350 PEAR ST Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 03/28/2009 30046 2009-000237 04:47 330 W WIND DR Public service assistance, other 03/28/2009 30046 2009-000238 10:12 209 S STATE ST Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 03/28/2009 30046 2009-000239 10:46 220 WILLIAM ST 428A Building or structure weakened or collapsed 03/29/2009 30046 2009-000240 10:09 206 GRINDING WHEEL DR Service Call, other 03/29/2009 30046 2009-000241 14:51 3 RIVERSIDE RD Good intent call, other 03/29/2009 30046 2009-000242 15:38 255 WEBBS LA; BLD D Malicious, mischievous false call, other 03/29/2009 30046 2009-000243 17:48 BAY RD Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 03/29/2009 30046 2009-000244 20:08 418 N GOVERNORS AVE Hazardous condition, other 03/30/2009 30046 2009-000245 19:56 418 N GOVERNORS AVE Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 03/31/2009 30046 2009-000246 06:08 404 S STATE ST Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 03/31/2009 30046 2009-000247 12:40 139 LYNNHAVEN DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 03/31/2009 30046 2009-000248 21:04 42 HEATHERFIELD WAY Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 03/31/2009 30046 2009-000249 22:14 S DUPONT HWY Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 04/01/2009 30046 2009-000250 14:31 306 S STATE ST Carbon monoxide incident

04/01/2009 30046 2009-000251 19:20 411 S QUEEN ST Cooking fire, confined to container 04/02/2009 30046 2009-000252 14:21 1704 E LEBANON RD Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 04/02/2009 30046 2009-000253 17:13 532 RIVER RD Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 04/02/2009 30046 2009-000254 19:40 1080 SILVER LAKE BLVD Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 04/02/2009 30046 2009-000255 21:23 682 ROBERTA AV Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 04/03/2009 30046 2009-000256 10:44 65 CARVER RD False alarm or false call, other 04/03/2009 30046 2009-000257 21:40 139 S STATE ST Assist police or other governmental agency 04/04/2009 30046 2009-000258 10:29 45 S STATE ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 04/04/2009 30046 2009-000259 17:40 2030 PINE CABIN RD BLDG D Cooking fire, confined to container 04/05/2009 30046 2009-000260 02:04 2030 320 BILLY MITCHELL LN BLDG G False alarm or false call, other 04/05/2009 30046 2009-000261 10:55 45 S STATE ST Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 04/05/2009 30046 2009-000262 14:36 3957 HAZLETTVILLE RD Building fire 04/05/2009 30046 2009-000263 18:32 418 NORTH GOVERNORS Carbon monoxide incident 04/06/2009 30046 2009-000264 19:25 104 SAULSBURY RD False alarm or false call, other 04/07/2009 30046 2009-000265 07:54 1074 S STATE ST Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 04/07/2009 30046 2009-000266 09:26 21 WAYNE DR Extrication of victim(s) from building/structure 04/08/2009 30046 2009-000267 11:58 42 PRIMROSE DR Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 04/08/2009 30046 2009-000268 18:47 820 CARVEL DR Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 04/08/2009 30046 2009-000269 20:55 413 COURT ST Cooking fire, confined to container 04/09/2009 30046 2009-000270 18:09 102 S governors ave Malicious, mischievous false call, other 04/10/2009 30046 2009-000271 17:23 405 DOGWOOD AVE Cooking fire, confined to container 04/11/2009 30046 2009-000272 16:50 NEW BURTON RD Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 04/12/2009 30046 2009-000273 18:35 SR 1 Passenger vehicle fire 04/12/2009 30046 2009-000274 19:48 2030 PINE CABIN RD BLDG D Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 04/12/2009 30046 2009-000275 21:05 1154 S GOVERNORS AVE Mobile property (vehicle) fire, other 04/13/2009 30046 2009-000277 07:41 605 Bay Rd. Building fire 04/13/2009 30046 2009-000276 07:41 615 N W FRONT ST Cover assignment, standby, moveup 04/13/2009 30046 2009-000278 13:50 200 BANNING ST Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle

04/14/2009 30046 2009-000279 00:46 297 KESSELRING AVE Good intent call, other 04/14/2009 30046 2009-000280 15:16 1300 S FARMVIEW DR False alarm or false call, other 04/17/2009 30046 2009-000281 03:04 2 S BRADFORD ST Good intent call, other 04/18/2009 30046 2009-000282 07:00 430 COLLEGE RD Water or steam leak 04/18/2009 30046 2009-000283 09:42 30 S GOVERNORS AVE Police matter 04/18/2009 30046 2009-000284 16:22 430 COURT ST Attempted burning, illegal action, other 04/19/2009 30046 2009-000285 02:32 908 WOODCREST DR Building fire 04/19/2009 30046 2009-000286 06:35 314 N GOVERNORS AVE 04/21/2009 30046 2009-000287 00:24 ROCKFORD CROSSING System malfunction, other 04/21/2009 30046 2009-000288 08:03 1200 N DUPONT HWY Passenger vehicle fire 04/21/2009 30046 2009-000289 17:07 1290 BAY RD Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 04/22/2009 30046 2009-000290 05:22 1300 FARMVIEW DR Hazardous condition, other 04/22/2009 30046 2009-000291 09:14 1095 S BRADFORD ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 04/22/2009 30046 2009-000292 18:18 10 FAIRWAY LAKES DR Smoke scare, odor of smoke 04/22/2009 30046 2009-000293 20:33 122 WILLIAM PENN ST False alarm or false call, other 04/23/2009 30046 2009-000294 01:25 904 WHATCOAT DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 04/23/2009 30046 2009-000295 15:07 181 WESTMINSTER DR Extinguishing system activation due to malfunction 04/23/2009 30046 2009-000296 15:32 1200 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 04/23/2009 30046 2009-000297 19:22 2030 GENERALS WAY Cooking fire, confined to container 04/23/2009 30046 2009-000298 22:49 126 N KIRKWOOD ST Outside rubbish fire, other 04/23/2009 30046 2009-000299 23:19 32 W LOOCKERMAN ST Outside rubbish fire, other 04/23/2009 30046 2009-000300 23:34 118 BANK LANE Building fire 04/24/2009 30046 2009-000301 00:12 506 S STATE ST System malfunction, other 04/24/2009 30046 2009-000302 18:13 Lakeland ave Forest, woods or wildland fire 04/24/2009 30046 2009-000303 19:48 32 S GOVERNORS AVE Cooking fire, confined to container 04/25/2009 30046 2009-000304 04:00 20 N BRADFORD ST Cooking fire, confined to container 04/25/2009 30046 2009-000305 11:57 S STATE ST & E WATER ST Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 04/25/2009 30046 2009-000306 12:01 1365 N. DUPONT HIGHWAY Direct tie to FD, malicious false alarm

04/25/2009 30046 2009-000307 18:18 38 THE GREEN System malfunction, other 04/25/2009 30046 2009-000308 20:49 3000 LEMAY LA Municipal alarm system, malicious false alarm 04/25/2009 30046 2009-000309 23:20 IAO ROBERTA AVE. Authorized controlled burning 04/25/2009 30046 2009-000310 23:32 245 S DUPONT HWY False alarm or false call, other 04/26/2009 30046 2009-000311 06:06 1180 WALKER RD Cooking fire, confined to container 04/26/2009 30046 2009-000312 18:43 18 SPRUANCE RD Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 04/26/2009 30046 2009-000313 20:16 45 POPLAR LA System malfunction, other 04/26/2009 30046 2009-000314 20:36 506 S. STATE ST System malfunction, other 04/26/2009 30046 2009-000315 21:55 121 MILLCREEK DR Building fire 04/27/2009 30046 2009-000316 10:06 271 N DUPONT HWY False alarm or false call, other 04/28/2009 30046 2009-000317 06:22 1450 S DUPONT HWY False alarm or false call, other 04/28/2009 30046 2009-000318 15:48 113 LOTUS ST Person in distress, other 04/28/2009 30046 2009-000319 23:33 892 WOODCREST DR 2-6 Building fire 04/29/2009 30046 2009-000320 11:03 350 PEAR ST Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 04/29/2009 30046 2009-000321 11:24 1200 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 04/29/2009 30046 2009-000322 19:37 104 OVERLOOK PL Good intent call, other 04/30/2009 30046 2009-000323 12:22 1700 N DUPONT HWY Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 04/30/2009 30046 2009-000324 13:34 1005 N STATE ST False alarm or false call, other 04/30/2009 30046 2009-000325 19:31 108 TRAFALGAR DR Overheated motor 05/01/2009 30046 2009-000326 00:15 506 S STATE ST System malfunction, other 05/01/2009 30046 2009-000327 17:02 101 BABB DR Cooking fire, confined to container 05/01/2009 30046 2009-000328 18:58 101 BABB DR 1126 Cooking fire, confined to container 05/02/2009 30046 2009-000329 14:32 410 Nimitz Rd Building fire 05/02/2009 30046 2009-000330 21:03 889 S LITTLE CREEK RD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 05/03/2009 30046 2009-000331 02:44 892 WOODCREST DR 1-1 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 05/03/2009 30046 2009-000332 11:31 1365 WEST NORTH STREET False alarm or false call, other 05/03/2009 30046 2009-000333 20:50 3626 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 05/04/2009 30046 2009-000334 13:29 120 S GOVERNORS AVE Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional

05/04/2009 30046 2009-000335 19:00 1700 N DUPONT HWY Good intent call, other 05/05/2009 30046 2009-000336 06:36 317 ALDER RD Heat from short circuit (wiring), defective/worn 05/05/2009 30046 2009-000337 10:13 89 KINGS HWY Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 05/05/2009 30046 2009-000338 15:47 837 Bison Rd Fires in structure other than in a building 05/06/2009 30046 2009-000339 09:52 1365 N DUPONT HWY Extinguishing system activation 05/07/2009 30046 2009-000340 04:43 1121 FORREST AVE Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 05/07/2009 30046 2009-000341 10:04 1030 FORREST AVE 124/12 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 05/07/2009 30046 2009-000342 16:48 561 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 05/08/2009 30046 2009-000343 12:26 2020 SHARON hILL ROAD System malfunction, other 05/08/2009 30046 2009-000344 19:17 1760 N DUPONT HWY Good intent call, other 05/08/2009 30046 2009-000345 20:14 121 KINGS CLIFF False alarm or false call, other 05/08/2009 30046 2009-000346 20:40 140 BURNING TREE RD False alarm or false call, other 05/08/2009 30046 2009-000347 20:49 400 N DUPONT HWY E False alarm or false call, other 05/08/2009 30046 2009-000348 22:08 6284 W DENNEYS RD Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 05/09/2009 30046 2009-000349 18:05 1262 HORSEPOND RD System malfunction, other 05/09/2009 30046 2009-000350 20:29 2030 GENERALS WAY B Service Call, other 05/10/2009 30046 2009-000351 00:29 1080 SILVER LAKE BLVD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 05/10/2009 30046 2009-000352 07:51 1080 SILVER LAKE BLVD Heat detector activation due to malfunction 05/10/2009 30046 2009-000353 08:25 1365 N DUPONT HWY Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 05/10/2009 30046 2009-000354 09:13 507 CAROL ST Cooking fire, confined to container 05/10/2009 30046 2009-000355 13:52 920 S GOVERNORS AVE Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 05/10/2009 30046 2009-000356 17:21 404 WALKER ROAD Oil or other combustible liquid spill 05/10/2009 30046 2009-000357 18:34 655 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 05/10/2009 30046 2009-000358 21:57 400 N DUPONT HWY E System malfunction, other 05/11/2009 30046 2009-000359 03:22 35 COMMERCE WAY SUITE Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 05/11/2009 30046 2009-000360 18:49 BUCKSON DRIVE Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 05/11/2009 30046 2009-000361 22:03 133 DORIAN False alarm or false call, other 05/12/2009 30046 2009-000362 08:17 561 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other

05/12/2009 30046 2009-000363 10:48 260 BEISER BLVD Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 05/14/2009 30046 2009-000364 16:05 245 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 05/15/2009 30046 2009-000365 12:02 1708 E LEBANON RD Assist police or other governmental agency 05/16/2009 30046 2009-000366 07:48 46 NICHOLAS DR Cooking fire, confined to container 05/17/2009 30046 2009-000367 10:59 185 S GOVERNORS BLVD Good intent call, other 05/18/2009 30046 2009-000368 10:26 334 NORTH DOWN DRIVE Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 05/18/2009 30046 2009-000369 19:51 1200 N DUPONT HWY Good intent call, other 05/19/2009 30046 2009-000370 10:19 211 DELAWARE AVE Malicious, mischievous false call, other 05/20/2009 30046 2009-000371 01:18 65 DENNIS AVE Service Call, other 05/20/2009 30046 2009-000372 18:23 1207 WHITEOAK RD Smoke or odor removal 05/21/2009 30046 2009-000373 02:09 1136 YEARSLEY DR Service Call, other 05/21/2009 30046 2009-000374 08:21 102 W WATER ST Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 05/22/2009 30046 2009-000375 02:17 325 BROAD STAIRS PL Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 05/22/2009 30046 2009-000376 11:50 120 COOPER RD Cooking fire, confined to container 05/22/2009 30046 2009-000377 14:04 60 CARVER RD False alarm or false call, other 05/22/2009 30046 2009-000378 16:00 120 S GOVERNORS AVE A False alarm or false call, other 05/22/2009 30046 2009-000379 17:05 123 S QUEEN ST Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 05/22/2009 30046 2009-000380 17:29 86 HARRIET ST Grass fire 05/23/2009 30046 2009-000381 14:47 SR1 SR1 @ MAIN TOLL PLAZA MM 63 Passenger vehicle fire 05/24/2009 30046 2009-000382 09:51 24 STONEY DR Passenger vehicle fire 05/24/2009 30046 2009-000383 15:52 910 WHATCOAT DR Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 05/24/2009 30046 2009-000384 16:06 117 GREENHILL AVE Malicious, mischievous false call, other 05/25/2009 30046 2009-000385 00:02 3779 PINE CABIN ROAD Outside equipment fire 05/25/2009 30046 2009-000386 13:23 304 S. STATE Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 05/25/2009 30046 2009-000387 15:44 102 S STATE ST False alarm or false call, other 05/26/2009 30046 2009-000388 07:16 100 SCULL TERR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 05/26/2009 30046 2009-000389 09:47 909 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 05/28/2009 30046 2009-000390 18:26 561 N DUPONT HWY Unintentional transmission of alarm, other

05/29/2009 30046 2009-000391 20:34 221 FALMOUTH WAY Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 05/30/2009 30046 2009-000392 08:07 3700 BAY RD Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 05/30/2009 30046 2009-000393 17:19 233 LOOCKERMAN ST System malfunction, other 05/30/2009 30046 2009-000394 20:58 GREENTREE DR 160 SUITE Passenger vehicle fire 05/30/2009 30046 2009-000395 22:14 1200 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 05/31/2009 30046 2009-000396 00:14 CARROLLS PLAZA Smoke scare, odor of smoke 05/31/2009 30046 2009-000397 16:28 549 GEORGE WASHINGTON DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 05/31/2009 30046 2009-000398 17:30 801 N DUPONT HWY Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 05/31/2009 30046 2009-000399 18:38 855 LEPSIC RD Natural vegetation fire, other 05/31/2009 30046 2009-000400 18:48 515 N DUPONT HWY Outside rubbish fire, other 05/31/2009 30046 2009-000401 23:47 652 N DUPONT HWY Good intent call, other 06/01/2009 30046 2009-000402 00:49 100 Campus Dr System malfunction, other 06/01/2009 30046 2009-000403 01:15 S DUPONT HWY Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 06/01/2009 30046 2009-000404 04:02 129 PERIWINKLE DR Building fire 06/01/2009 30046 2009-000405 14:06 506 S STATE ST Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 06/01/2009 30046 2009-000406 18:33 1131 N DUPONT HWY Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 06/01/2009 30046 2009-000407 18:50 100 Campus Dr Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 06/02/2009 30046 2009-000408 01:20 446 COUNTRY DR Local alarm system, malicious false alarm 06/02/2009 30046 2009-000409 04:48 1277 S GOVERNORS AVE Outside rubbish fire, other 06/03/2009 30046 2009-000410 09:29 1679 S STATE ST LOT 56 Outside storage fire 06/03/2009 30046 2009-000411 19:15 186 CARNOUSTIE RD Cooking fire, confined to container 06/03/2009 30046 2009-000412 19:35 216 GREEN BLADE DR Public service 06/04/2009 30046 2009-000413 04:00 222 S DUPONT HWY Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 06/05/2009 30046 2009-000414 09:33 43 HIGHVIEW AVE Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 06/05/2009 30046 2009-000415 19:43 400 N DUPONT HWY E Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 06/06/2009 30046 2009-000416 01:35 1450 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 06/06/2009 30046 2009-000417 07:49 251 NORTHDOWN DR Passenger vehicle fire 06/06/2009 30046 2009-000418 18:45 111 S NEW ST Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional

06/07/2009 30046 2009-000419 12:53 1123 OAK DR Cooking fire, confined to container 06/07/2009 30046 2009-000420 20:45 957 SUNSET TERR Smoke scare, odor of smoke 06/07/2009 30046 2009-000421 21:48 1365 W NORTH ST Cooking fire, confined to container 06/09/2009 30046 2009-000422 00:45 970 WHATCOAT DR Central station, malicious false alarm 06/09/2009 30046 2009-000423 06:37 1200 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 06/09/2009 30046 2009-000424 16:38 W NORTH ST Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 06/09/2009 30046 2009-000425 18:57 267 SHEFFIELD DR Building fire 06/09/2009 30046 2009-000426 19:08 150 SAULSBURY RD False alarm or false call, other 06/10/2009 30046 2009-000427 05:14 1180 WALKER RD Cooking fire, confined to container 06/11/2009 30046 2009-000428 01:10 19 S STATE ST Malicious, mischievous false call, other 06/11/2009 30046 2009-000429 10:43 1536 N DUPONT HWY Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 06/14/2009 30046 2009-000430 03:04 1137 S STATE ST Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 06/15/2009 30046 2009-000431 11:56 110 FIREHOUSE LANE Cover assignment, standby, moveup 06/15/2009 30046 2009-000432 14:40 1180 WALKER RD False alarm or false call, other 06/16/2009 30046 2009-000433 08:56 23 S NEW ST Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 06/17/2009 30046 2009-000434 11:15 1572 N DUPONT HWY Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 06/17/2009 30046 2009-000435 17:07 1200 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 06/17/2009 30046 2009-000436 19:13 50 ROCKFORD CROSSING Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 06/17/2009 30046 2009-000437 20:33 800 BAY RD Malicious, mischievous false call, other 06/17/2009 30046 2009-000438 20:33 1225 WALKER RD Water evacuation 06/18/2009 30046 2009-000439 02:54 35 COMMERCE WAY SUITE False alarm or false call, other 06/18/2009 30046 2009-000440 21:10 162 STONEY DR Good intent call, other 06/19/2009 30046 2009-000441 09:05 1706 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 06/19/2009 30046 2009-000442 12:47 DuPont Hwy. Rescue, EMS incident, other 06/20/2009 30046 2009-000443 10:04 129 FALMOUTH WAY Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 06/20/2009 30046 2009-000444 15:22 986 WHATCOAT DR Vicinity alarm (incident in other location) 06/20/2009 30046 2009-000445 16:33 2030 GENERALS WAY B Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 06/20/2009 30046 2009-000446 18:01 1125 FORREST AVE Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional

06/20/2009 30046 2009-000447 19:01 138 GORDON PLACE Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 06/20/2009 30046 2009-000448 21:49 919 BUCK DR Building fire 06/21/2009 30046 2009-000449 01:40 1450 N DUPONT HWY 06/21/2009 30046 2009-000450 10:26 212 PORTMARNOCK CT Cooking fire, confined to container 06/21/2009 30046 2009-000451 14:27 1057 S GOVERNORS AVE Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 06/22/2009 30046 2009-000452 11:24 1095 S BRADFORD ST A Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 06/22/2009 30046 2009-000453 14:17 1450 N DUPONT HWY Extinguishing system activation due to malfunction 06/22/2009 30046 2009-000454 20:56 1300 S FARMVIEW DR F Cooking fire, confined to container 06/22/2009 30046 2009-000455 21:17 103 PINE ST Outside rubbish fire, other 06/22/2009 30046 2009-000456 22:06 735 BACON AVE Good intent call, other 06/23/2009 30046 2009-000457 11:47 8 MANOR DR System malfunction, other 06/23/2009 30046 2009-000458 18:28 930 WHATCOAT DR Local alarm system, malicious false alarm 06/23/2009 30046 2009-000459 18:51 369 BEECHWOOD AVE Lock-in (if lock out , use 511 ) 06/23/2009 30046 2009-000460 19:07 1200 N DUPONT HWY False alarm or false call, other 06/23/2009 30046 2009-000461 19:12 280 ROSE VALLEY SCHOOL RD Outside rubbish fire, other 06/24/2009 30046 2009-000462 11:50 1006 COLLEGE RD Passenger vehicle fire 06/24/2009 30046 2009-000463 16:35 FORREST AVE Rescue, EMS incident, other 06/24/2009 30046 2009-000464 17:05 73 WILLIAM CHANDLER ST Cooking fire, confined to container 06/25/2009 30046 2009-000465 20:56 11 PAR HAVEN DR D Good intent call, other 06/26/2009 30046 2009-000466 10:33 06/26/2009 30046 2009-000467 21:04 255 WEBBS LA B Cooking fire, confined to container 06/27/2009 30046 2009-000468 06:00 2898 ARTHURSVILLE RD Cover assignment, standby, moveup 06/27/2009 30046 2009-000469 11:21 1231 N Dupont hwy Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 06/27/2009 30046 2009-000470 12:13 1424 FORREST AVE Combustible/flammable gas/liquid condition, other 06/27/2009 30046 2009-000471 16:20 573 ROBERTA AV Passenger vehicle fire 06/27/2009 30046 2009-000472 17:58 SHARON HILL RD Rescue, EMS incident, other 06/29/2009 30046 2009-000473 01:49 30 S NEW ST 06/29/2009 30046 2009-000474 18:51 414 E WIND DR

06/30/2009 30046 2009-000475 17:33 100 HAMAN DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 07/01/2009 30046 2009-000476 08:48 52 ANCHOR LANE Combustible/flammable gas/liquid condition, other 07/01/2009 30046 2009-000477 18:14 234 N KIRKWOOD ST Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 07/03/2009 30046 2009-000478 04:25 50 HERITAGE DR Good intent call, other 07/03/2009 30046 2009-000479 05:39 317 S STATE ST False alarm or false call, other 07/03/2009 30046 2009-000480 16:21 PHEOINIX DR Water & ice-related rescue, other 07/03/2009 30046 2009-000481 20:36 181 WESTMINSTER DR Person in distress, other 07/03/2009 30046 2009-000482 20:41 225 CECIL ST System malfunction, other 07/03/2009 30046 2009-000483 21:09 1200 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 07/04/2009 30046 2009-000484 01:38 68 STEVENSON DR 68 Special outside fire, other 07/04/2009 30046 2009-000485 01:46 1289 WALKER RD BUILD A Good intent call, other 07/04/2009 30046 2009-000486 01:47 109- WILLIS RD Good intent call, other 07/04/2009 30046 2009-000487 14:02 20 S QUEEN ST Trash or rubbish fire, contained 07/04/2009 30046 2009-000488 14:42 744 RIVER RD Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 07/04/2009 30046 2009-000489 16:14 1095 S BRADFORD ST C Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 07/06/2009 30046 2009-000490 09:58 1091 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 07/07/2009 30046 2009-000491 13:16 308 N QUEEN ST Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 07/08/2009 30046 2009-000492 03:13 868 WOODCREST DR BLDG I 07/08/2009 30046 2009-000493 18:25 1704 E LEBANON RD Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 07/08/2009 30046 2009-000494 22:13 11 PAR HAVEN DR A Service Call, other 07/09/2009 30046 2009-000495 00:40 413 COURT ST J Malicious, mischievous false call, other 07/09/2009 30046 2009-000496 21:25 119 HOLMES ST Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 07/10/2009 30046 2009-000497 06:03 2800 N DUPONT HWY Hazardous condition, other 07/10/2009 30046 2009-000498 11:02 21 HERITAGE DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 07/11/2009 30046 2009-000499 09:33 FORREST AVE Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 07/12/2009 30046 2009-000500 02:26 166 HAMPTON DR False alarm or false call, other 07/13/2009 30046 2009-000501 08:18 116 SHADOW CT Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 07/13/2009 30046 2009-000502 21:16 1570 N DUPONT HWY Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other

07/14/2009 30046 2009-000503 18:17 400 COURT ST 07/14/2009 30046 2009-000504 19:45 150 SAULSBURY RD Extinguishing system activation due to malfunction 07/14/2009 30046 2009-000505 21:28 566 WALNUT SHADE RD Building fire 07/15/2009 30046 2009-000506 17:44 290 S DUPONT HWY 07/15/2009 30046 2009-000507 18:38 1113 S. State St Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 07/16/2009 30046 2009-000508 15:55 3000 LEMAY LA C System malfunction, other 07/16/2009 30046 2009-000509 20:41 184 WILLIS RD H Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 07/17/2009 30046 2009-000510 01:28 1289 WALKER RD BUILD A Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 07/17/2009 30046 2009-000511 17:49 1300 S FARMVIEW DR G Malicious, mischievous false call, other 07/18/2009 30046 2009-000512 07:31 227 FIDDLERS GREEN Cooking fire, confined to container 07/19/2009 30046 2009-000513 10:27 644 S QUEEN ST 105 Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 07/19/2009 30046 2009-000514 22:19 77 Grissom st Good intent call, other 07/20/2009 30046 2009-000515 14:28 45 ANCHOR LANE CO detector activation due to malfunction 07/20/2009 30046 2009-000516 20:30 145 HAMAN DR Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 07/20/2009 30046 2009-000517 20:36 113 WYOMING AVE Good intent call, other 07/21/2009 30046 2009-000518 02:42 50 TAMMY DR Fire, other 07/21/2009 30046 2009-000519 09:52 RT 1 SB Grass fire 07/22/2009 30046 2009-000520 19:40 595 FOREST ST Hazardous condition, other 07/23/2009 30046 2009-000521 08:21 1200 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 07/24/2009 30046 2009-000522 14:58 92 Village dr Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 07/25/2009 30046 2009-000523 23:04 11 PAR HAVEN DR D Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 07/25/2009 30046 2009-000524 23:07 1300 S FARMVIEW DR A Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 07/25/2009 30046 2009-000525 23:17 11 PAR HAVEN DR G Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 07/25/2009 30046 2009-000526 23:25 11 PAR HAVEN DR B Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 07/26/2009 30046 2009-000527 01:49 222 S DUPONT HWY Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 07/27/2009 30046 2009-000528 13:28 18 OLD RUDNICK LA Passenger vehicle fire 07/27/2009 30046 2009-000529 20:42 ROUTE 1 LAFFERTY LA TO END OF Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 07/28/2009 30046 2009-000530 11:56 121 W LOOCKERMAN ST Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional

07/28/2009 30046 2009-000531 12:55 316 S GOVERNORS AVE Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 07/28/2009 30046 2009-000532 18:59 848 WOODCREST DR BLDG C Malicious, mischievous false call, other 07/28/2009 30046 2009-000533 19:36 1788 N DUPONT HWY 07/29/2009 30046 2009-000534 07:05 19 N GOVERNORS AVE Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 07/29/2009 30046 2009-000535 11:56 3876 Turkey Point Rd. Building fire 07/29/2009 30046 2009-000536 18:58 63 SAXTON RD Public service assistance, other 07/29/2009 30046 2009-000537 18:58 100 ENTERPRISE PL Water problem, other 07/29/2009 30046 2009-000538 20:02 226 S STATE ST Steam, other gas mistaken for smoke, other 07/30/2009 30046 2009-000539 00:33 431 BARRISTER PL Building fire 07/30/2009 30046 2009-000540 01:00 1080 SILVER LAKE BLVD Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 07/30/2009 30046 2009-000541 04:09 111 S QUEEN ST Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 07/31/2009 30046 2009-000542 16:52 N LITTLE CREEK RD Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 07/31/2009 30046 2009-000543 16:53 575 CRAWFORD AVE Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 07/31/2009 30046 2009-000544 17:24 618 ROBERTA AVE Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 07/31/2009 30046 2009-000545 18:09 WAPLES AVE Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 07/31/2009 30046 2009-000546 23:47 1131 N DUPONT HWY Passenger vehicle fire 08/01/2009 30046 2009-000547 11:01 344 N new st Authorized controlled burning 08/01/2009 30046 2009-000548 15:54 1425 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 08/01/2009 30046 2009-000549 22:17 2030 PINE CABIN RD BLDG D Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 08/03/2009 30046 2009-000550 20:15 631 S STATE ST System malfunction, other 08/04/2009 30046 2009-000551 03:37 730 W DIVISION ST Good intent call, other 08/04/2009 30046 2009-000552 20:35 304 S state st Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 08/05/2009 30046 2009-000553 01:59 908 WOODCREST DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 08/05/2009 30046 2009-000554 14:23 631 S STATE ST Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 08/06/2009 30046 2009-000555 06:08 600 JEFFERIC BLVD False alarm or false call, other 08/06/2009 30046 2009-000556 08:37 30 HOYLAKE CT Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 08/06/2009 30046 2009-000557 18:48 437 TROON RD Cooking fire, confined to container 08/06/2009 30046 2009-000558 21:21 405 DOGWOOD AVE Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional

08/07/2009 30046 2009-000559 13:30 FORREST AVE Good intent call, other 08/07/2009 30046 2009-000560 17:42 BAY ROAD Smoke or odor removal 08/07/2009 30046 2009-000561 19:14 500 PERSIMMON TREE LA 1 Cooking fire, confined to container 08/08/2009 30046 2009-000562 04:35 1450 S DUPONT HWY Passenger vehicle fire 08/08/2009 30046 2009-000563 09:51 121 W LOOCKERMAN ST Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 08/08/2009 30046 2009-000564 20:38 526 WALKER RD Building fire 08/09/2009 30046 2009-000565 16:44 95 SAXTON RD Medical assist, assist EMS crew 08/10/2009 30046 2009-000566 02:41 3 WATERFALL DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 08/10/2009 30046 2009-000567 13:22 1575 MCKEE RD 102 Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 08/10/2009 30046 2009-000568 19:50 KENTON RD Good intent call, other 08/11/2009 30046 2009-000569 08:49 953 CHESTNUT GROVE RD False alarm or false call, other 08/11/2009 30046 2009-000570 09:15 39 TISCHER DR Good intent call, other 08/11/2009 30046 2009-000571 10:36 631 S STATE ST Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 08/12/2009 30046 2009-000572 17:03 1231 N dupont hwy Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 08/12/2009 30046 2009-000573 23:20 150 SAULSBURY RD Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 08/13/2009 30046 2009-000574 06:55 RT. 1 N/B Passenger vehicle fire 08/13/2009 30046 2009-000575 07:43 RT 1 N/B Passenger vehicle fire 08/13/2009 30046 2009-000576 14:42 27 N DUPONT HWY Public service 08/13/2009 30046 2009-000577 19:49 970 WHATCOAT DR Malicious, mischievous false call, other 08/14/2009 30046 2009-000578 03:34 CLARA ST Passenger vehicle fire 08/14/2009 30046 2009-000579 07:47 520 S. WEST ST Building fire 08/15/2009 30046 2009-000580 02:55 11 STEVENSON DR Service Call, other 08/15/2009 30046 2009-000581 13:41 353 N GOVERNORS AVE False alarm or false call, other 08/15/2009 30046 2009-000582 18:59 353 N GOVERNORS AVE Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 08/15/2009 30046 2009-000583 22:59 992 WHATCOAT DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 08/16/2009 30046 2009-000584 18:59 195 LYNNHAVEN DR Overheated motor 08/17/2009 30046 2009-000585 22:05 132 S NEW ST Cooking fire, confined to container 08/18/2009 30046 2009-000586 08:46 591 S DUPONT HWY

08/18/2009 30046 2009-000587 15:47 636 Nimitiz rd Rd Service Call, other 08/18/2009 30046 2009-000588 16:25 Court st Good intent call, other 08/20/2009 30046 2009-000589 08:01 121 DUKE OF YORK Heat detector activation due to malfunction 08/20/2009 30046 2009-000590 09:39 430 COLLEGE RD 600 Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 08/20/2009 30046 2009-000591 11:40 303 NORTHDOWN DR 08/21/2009 30046 2009-000592 14:00 257 N DUPONT HWY Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 08/22/2009 30046 2009-000593 03:29 5 CHASE HALL Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 08/22/2009 30046 2009-000594 07:39 911 S DUPONT HWY 1 Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 08/22/2009 30046 2009-000595 08:01 537 ROBERTA AV Lightning strike (no fire) 08/22/2009 30046 2009-000596 09:10 224 KESSELRING AVE Service Call, other 08/22/2009 30046 2009-000597 09:42 319 BILLY MITCHELL LANE Medical assist, assist EMS crew 08/22/2009 30046 2009-000598 09:55 S STATE ST & E REED ST Extrication, rescue, other 08/22/2009 30046 2009-000599 23:11 1365 N DUPONT HWY 3000 System malfunction, other 08/22/2009 30046 2009-000600 23:52 324 BROADSTAIRS PLACE System malfunction, other 08/23/2009 30046 2009-000601 05:15 1080 SILVER LAKE BLVD Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 08/23/2009 30046 2009-000602 08:39 12 MANOR DR Overheated motor 08/23/2009 30046 2009-000603 10:57 97 COMMERCE WAY 101 Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 08/23/2009 30046 2009-000604 17:18 195 WILLIS RD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 08/24/2009 30046 2009-000605 10:44 EAST AVE 08/24/2009 30046 2009-000606 14:48 211 DELAWARE AVE 08/25/2009 30046 2009-000607 01:45 35 COMMERCE WAY SUITE Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 08/25/2009 30046 2009-000608 20:04 S QUEEN ST Good intent call, other 08/26/2009 30046 2009-000609 11:08 319 WILLIAM Ave Building fire 08/26/2009 30046 2009-000610 11:45 848 WOODCREST DR BLDG B B1 08/27/2009 30046 2009-000611 08:46 121 DUKE OF YORK Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 08/27/2009 30046 2009-000612 08:49 230 BEISER BLVD 103 Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 08/27/2009 30046 2009-000613 08:59 104 GAGEN CT Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 08/27/2009 30046 2009-000614 15:46 131 SAULSBURY RD Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill

08/27/2009 30046 2009-000615 21:02 280 Quails Nest Dr. Good intent call, other 08/28/2009 30046 2009-000616 00:29 1300 S FARMVIEW DR L Public service 08/28/2009 30046 2009-000617 11:00 31 KENTWOOD DR False alarm or false call, other 08/28/2009 30046 2009-000618 15:39 110 SHINNECOCK RD False alarm or false call, other 08/28/2009 30046 2009-000619 16:00 426 S NEW ST Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 08/28/2009 30046 2009-000620 19:06 WYOMING AVE & NEW BURTON RD 08/28/2009 30046 2009-000621 20:34 640 LAFFERTY LA Lock-in (if lock out , use 511 ) 08/29/2009 30046 2009-000622 03:32 1420 MCKEE RD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 08/29/2009 30046 2009-000623 08:53 162 WILLIS RD Service Call, other 08/29/2009 30046 2009-000624 16:41 461 N DUPONT HWY Passenger vehicle fire 08/30/2009 30046 2009-000625 05:55 1030 FORREST AVE 107 Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 08/30/2009 30046 2009-000626 19:27 Rt 1 NB mile marker 65 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 08/30/2009 30046 2009-000627 20:14 1423 NEW BURTON RD Special outside fire, other 08/30/2009 30046 2009-000628 23:11 623 FULTON ST Building fire 08/31/2009 30046 2009-000629 05:32 623 FULTON ST Building fire 09/01/2009 30046 2009-000630 11:25 BAY RD Good intent call, other 09/01/2009 30046 2009-000631 17:27 1244 FORREST AVE Extrication, rescue, other 09/01/2009 30046 2009-000632 21:05 744 RIVER RD Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 09/01/2009 30046 2009-000633 22:23 210 BAY TREE RD E Extinguishing system activation due to malfunction 09/02/2009 30046 2009-000634 05:57 15 PARK DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 09/02/2009 30046 2009-000635 12:59 13 ROOSEVELT AVE BLDG A 4 Cooking fire, confined to container 09/03/2009 30046 2009-000636 06:03 1180 WALKER RD Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 09/03/2009 30046 2009-000637 08:10 744 RIVER RD False alarm or false call, other 09/03/2009 30046 2009-000638 12:15 148 Quails Nest Dr Cooking fire, confined to container 09/03/2009 30046 2009-000639 15:10 S DUPONT HWY Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 09/04/2009 30046 2009-000640 10:58 744 RIVER RD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 09/04/2009 30046 2009-000641 14:43 1030 FORREST AVE 107 System malfunction, other 09/04/2009 30046 2009-000642 16:18 706 WILLIAM ST System malfunction, other

09/04/2009 30046 2009-000643 22:09 210 BAY TREE RD E Extinguishing system activation due to malfunction 09/06/2009 30046 2009-000644 12:34 1525 E. LEBANON ROAD Building fire 09/06/2009 30046 2009-000645 16:19 7 NIXON LA Person in distress, other 09/07/2009 30046 2009-000646 13:03 1425 N DUPONT HWY Dispatched & canceled en route 09/07/2009 30046 2009-000647 14:32 22 MORIARTY STREET Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 09/08/2009 30046 2009-000648 03:03 2267 KITTS HUMMOCK ROAD Cover assignment, standby, moveup 09/08/2009 30046 2009-000649 03:12 311 MAIN ST Cover assignment, standby, moveup 09/08/2009 30046 2009-000650 08:42 RT 10 OVERPASS & SR1 Good intent call, other 09/08/2009 30046 2009-000651 18:41 80 PUGH ST Person in distress, other 09/08/2009 30046 2009-000652 20:32 1300 S FARMVIEW DR E Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 09/09/2009 30046 2009-000653 13:30 1131 N DUPONT HWY 09/09/2009 30046 2009-000654 13:45 293 S. SAULSBURY RD False alarm or false call, other 09/09/2009 30046 2009-000655 19:06 300 W WATER ST Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 09/11/2009 30046 2009-000656 16:36 11 KINGS HWY Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 09/11/2009 30046 2009-000657 20:41 300 W WATER ST Smoke scare, odor of smoke 09/12/2009 30046 2009-000658 01:18 820 CARVEL DR A Passenger vehicle fire 09/13/2009 30046 2009-000659 12:31 1200 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 09/13/2009 30046 2009-000660 21:04 1300 S FARMVIEW DR E Cooking fire, confined to container 09/14/2009 30046 2009-000661 14:29 40 E DIVISION ST Overpressure rupture, explosion, overheat other 09/14/2009 30046 2009-000662 16:40 1001 N DUPONT HWY 13 Vicinity alarm (incident in other location) 09/14/2009 30046 2009-000663 16:52 216 GREEN BLADE DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 09/14/2009 30046 2009-000664 19:51 2 HUNTLEY CIR Vicinity alarm (incident in other location) 09/14/2009 30046 2009-000665 22:13 210 BAY TREE RD E Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 09/15/2009 30046 2009-000666 13:49 2 STEELE RD Good intent call, other 09/16/2009 30046 2009-000667 12:49 350 PEAR ST Cooking fire, confined to container 09/16/2009 30046 2009-000668 14:04 400 N DUPONT HWY A System malfunction, other 09/16/2009 30046 2009-000669 18:13 54 S STATE ST Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 09/17/2009 30046 2009-000670 17:10 103 MOURNING DOVE LANE Cooking fire, confined to container

09/18/2009 30046 2009-000671 15:25 228 NORTHDOWN DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 09/19/2009 30046 2009-000672 14:09 930 WHATCOAT DR Cooking fire, confined to container 09/19/2009 30046 2009-000673 18:52 KESSELRING AVE & NEW BURTON RD Vehicle accident, general cleanup 09/19/2009 30046 2009-000674 23:17 140 HAMAN DR 09/20/2009 30046 2009-000675 02:34 120 N STATE ST Cooking fire, confined to container 09/20/2009 30046 2009-000676 06:35 N DUPONT HWY Outside rubbish fire, other 09/20/2009 30046 2009-000677 06:52 N STATE ST & WALKER RD Assist police or other governmental agency 09/20/2009 30046 2009-000678 08:52 54 BALTUSROL RD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 09/20/2009 30046 2009-000679 10:22 1225 WALKER RD Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 09/20/2009 30046 2009-000680 13:49 255 WEBBS LA B Outside rubbish fire, other 09/20/2009 30046 2009-000681 14:15 425 COUNTRY DR Carbon monoxide incident 09/20/2009 30046 2009-000682 19:52 138 Spruance rd Fire, other 09/20/2009 30046 2009-000683 23:30 60 ROCKFORD CROSSING Carbon monoxide incident 09/21/2009 30046 2009-000684 17:03 1200 N DUPONT HWY DELA Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 09/21/2009 30046 2009-000685 22:33 22 LOST TREE CT Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 09/23/2009 30046 2009-000686 01:26 51 WEBBS LA E Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 09/23/2009 30046 2009-000687 02:22 254 N GOVERNORS BLVD Building fire 09/23/2009 30046 2009-000688 18:50 114 DAVIS CIR Cooking fire, confined to container 09/23/2009 30046 2009-000689 23:13 3000 LEMAY LA C Good intent call, other 09/24/2009 30046 2009-000690 13:26 215 ROSS ST 09/25/2009 30046 2009-000691 18:17 14 M0riarity street False alarm or false call, other 09/25/2009 30046 2009-000692 19:13 50 ROCKFORD CROSSING Good intent call, other 09/26/2009 30046 2009-000693 00:39 1131 N DUPONT HWY Good intent call, other 09/26/2009 30046 2009-000694 02:05 STATE COLLEGE ROAD 09/26/2009 30046 2009-000695 04:15 801 N DUPONT HWY 09/26/2009 30046 2009-000696 13:22 1200 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 09/26/2009 30046 2009-000697 20:30 1131 N DUPONT HWY Good intent call, other 09/27/2009 30046 2009-000698 04:36 1131 N DUPONT HWY Carbon monoxide incident

09/27/2009 30046 2009-000699 13:47 600 JEFFERIC BLVD Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 09/27/2009 30046 2009-000700 20:14 Reed st Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 09/28/2009 30046 2009-000701 02:52 51 WEBBS LA A Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 09/29/2009 30046 2009-000702 04:17 1365 N DUPONT HWY 5000 Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 09/29/2009 30046 2009-000703 17:50 350 Pear st System malfunction, other 09/30/2009 30046 2009-000704 18:03 711 BICENTENNIAL BLVD Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 10/01/2009 30046 2009-000705 16:25 899 S. LITTLE CREEK False alarm or false call, other 10/02/2009 30046 2009-000706 08:38 210 MONARCH DR Fire in mobile home used as fixed residence 10/02/2009 30046 2009-000707 18:28 24 WILLIS RD Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 10/03/2009 30046 2009-000708 16:19 21 S LITTLE CREEK RD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 10/04/2009 30046 2009-000709 17:43 30 HOYLAKE CT Cooking fire, confined to container 10/05/2009 30046 2009-000710 18:16 S DUPONT HWY & S STATE ST Smoke scare, odor of smoke 10/05/2009 30046 2009-000711 21:13 374 MIMOSA AV Smoke or odor removal 10/06/2009 30046 2009-000712 02:23 211 DELAWARE AVE System malfunction, other 10/07/2009 30046 2009-000713 12:30 51 WEBBS LA J Cooking fire, confined to container 10/08/2009 30046 2009-000714 16:19 State rt 1 Extrication, rescue, other 10/09/2009 30046 2009-000715 01:33 910 WHATCOAT DR Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 10/09/2009 30046 2009-000716 23:18 1506 N LITTLE CREEK RD 5 Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 10/09/2009 30046 2009-000717 23:58 914 WOODCREST DR Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 10/10/2009 30046 2009-000718 15:17 11 PAR HAVEN DR D Excessive heat, scorch burns with no ignition 10/10/2009 30046 2009-000719 21:34 GREENTREE DRIVE Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 10/10/2009 30046 2009-000720 22:46 1131 N DUPONT HWY 10/11/2009 30046 2009-000721 07:41 209 S STATE ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 10/11/2009 30046 2009-000722 10:58 905 S GOVERNORS AVE System malfunction, other 10/11/2009 30046 2009-000723 17:47 59 CHATHAM CT Cooking fire, confined to container 10/11/2009 30046 2009-000724 18:10 561 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 10/11/2009 30046 2009-000725 19:23 North Dupont Highway Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 10/12/2009 30046 2009-000726 09:39 1224 FORREST AVE Smoke detector activation due to malfunction

10/12/2009 30046 2009-000727 23:13 100 HAMAN DR Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 10/13/2009 30046 2009-000728 01:34 710 BUCKSON DR Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 10/13/2009 30046 2009-000729 09:55 681 Ridgley st Malicious, mischievous false call, other 10/13/2009 30046 2009-000730 12:07 900 Public Safety Blvd Cooking fire, confined to container 10/13/2009 30046 2009-000731 17:51 2161 FORREST AVE Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 10/14/2009 30046 2009-000732 00:22 85 COUNTRY FIVE DR Fire in mobile home used as fixed residence 10/14/2009 30046 2009-000733 14:34 1441 N DUPONT HWY 10/15/2009 30046 2009-000734 13:21 STATE STREET Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 10/15/2009 30046 2009-000735 20:32 51 WEBBS LA BB Cooking fire, confined to container 10/16/2009 30046 2009-000736 00:43 604 FAIRVIEW AVE Smoke scare, odor of smoke 10/17/2009 30046 2009-000737 15:53 255 WEBBS LA G Central station, malicious false alarm 10/17/2009 30046 2009-000738 16:43 1580 S DUPONT HWY 10/17/2009 30046 2009-000739 16:53 135 QUAIL HOLLOW DR 10/17/2009 30046 2009-000740 20:50 400 N DUPONT HWY Building fire 10/17/2009 30046 2009-000741 21:08 956 WHATCOAT DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 10/18/2009 30046 2009-000742 02:55 WYOMING MILL RD Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 10/18/2009 30046 2009-000743 07:33 WYOMING MILL RD Assist police or other governmental agency 10/18/2009 30046 2009-000744 19:57 1365 W NORTH ST Cooking fire, confined to container 10/19/2009 30046 2009-000745 16:25 340 EISENHOWER DR 10/19/2009 30046 2009-000746 20:37 858 WOODCREST DR BLDG E Cooking fire, confined to container 10/20/2009 30046 2009-000747 13:33 181 WESTMINSTER DR Extinguishing system activation due to malfunction 10/21/2009 30046 2009-000748 08:15 113 Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 10/21/2009 30046 2009-000749 20:03 430 KINGS HWY NE 1 Cooking fire, confined to container 10/21/2009 30046 2009-000750 20:06 908 WOODCREST DR Cooking fire, confined to container 10/22/2009 30046 2009-000751 19:23 255 WEBBS LA D Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 10/22/2009 30046 2009-000752 20:42 186 STONEY DR Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue 10/23/2009 30046 2009-000753 12:47 SR 1 Good intent call, other 10/23/2009 30046 2009-000754 20:24 550 S NEW ST System malfunction, other

10/24/2009 30046 2009-000755 12:06 1300 S FARMVIEW DR I False alarm or false call, other 10/24/2009 30046 2009-000756 16:24 1365 N DUPONT HWY 3054 10/25/2009 30046 2009-000757 13:11 209 S STATE ST Good intent call, other 10/25/2009 30046 2009-000758 15:23 45 S STATE ST Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 10/25/2009 30046 2009-000759 20:52 1001 WHITEOAK RD BLDG L False alarm or false call, other 10/26/2009 30046 2009-000760 04:46 300 JEFFREY PL 10/26/2009 30046 2009-000761 13:20 211 DELAWARE AVE Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 10/26/2009 30046 2009-000762 19:34 135 HAMAN DR Cooking fire, confined to container 10/27/2009 30046 2009-000763 00:34 35 COMMERNCE WAY SUITE Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 10/27/2009 30046 2009-000764 02:14 105 KATRINA WAY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 10/27/2009 30046 2009-000765 03:28 207 N WEST ST Good intent call, other 10/27/2009 30046 2009-000766 10:30 1 PAT LYNN DR 10/27/2009 30046 2009-000767 17:39 1200 N DUPONT HWY Central station, malicious false alarm 10/27/2009 30046 2009-000768 19:43 315 BILLY MITCHELL LA BLDG Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 10/27/2009 30046 2009-000769 23:25 117 QUAIL HOLLOW DR Good intent call, other 10/29/2009 30046 2009-000770 02:13 1365 N DUPONT HWY 5000 Extinguishing system activation 10/29/2009 30046 2009-000771 02:14 430 COLLEGE RD 500 Extinguishing system activation due to malfunction 10/29/2009 30046 2009-000772 06:26 2401 KENTON RD Building fire 10/29/2009 30046 2009-000773 10:45 216 S GOVERNORS BLVD CO detector activation due to malfunction 10/30/2009 30046 2009-000774 14:54 251 N GOVERNORS BLVD Overpressure rupture, explosion, overheat other 10/31/2009 30046 2009-000775 02:30 1225 WALKER RD System malfunction, other 10/31/2009 30046 2009-000776 21:24 110 S NEW ST Cooking fire, confined to container 10/31/2009 30046 2009-000777 22:37 Sherwood ct Medical assist, assist EMS crew 10/31/2009 30046 2009-000778 23:15 3000 LEMAY LA C-102 Cooking fire, confined to container 11/01/2009 30046 2009-000779 11:49 1575 MCKEE RD 102 Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 11/01/2009 30046 2009-000780 15:09 1574 N DUPONT HWY False alarm or false call, other 11/01/2009 30046 2009-000781 18:05 1221 COLLEGE PARK DR Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 11/01/2009 30046 2009-000782 23:11 900 PUBLIC SAFETY BLVD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction

11/02/2009 30046 2009-000783 00:03 515 ANNMORE ST Good intent call, other 11/03/2009 30046 2009-000784 14:28 COLLEGE RD Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 11/03/2009 30046 2009-000785 17:06 1572- N DUPONT HWY Passenger vehicle fire 11/03/2009 30046 2009-000786 17:11 337 WEST WIND DR Smoke scare, odor of smoke 11/03/2009 30046 2009-000787 22:45 744 RIVER RD Heat detector activation due to malfunction 11/04/2009 30046 2009-000788 00:09 172 HAMPTON DR Building fire 11/04/2009 30046 2009-000789 05:17 105 KATRINA WAY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 11/04/2009 30046 2009-000790 08:50 1030 FORREST AVE False alarm or false call, other 11/04/2009 30046 2009-000791 19:57 211 DELAWARE AVE Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 11/05/2009 30046 2009-000792 09:54 1259 N DUPONT HWY 188 Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 11/05/2009 30046 2009-000793 10:55 523 Ann Moore St System malfunction, other 11/05/2009 30046 2009-000794 16:04 216 GREEN BLADE DR Malicious, mischievous false call, other 11/06/2009 30046 2009-000795 17:18 117 FALMOUTH WAY Cooking fire, confined to container 11/07/2009 30046 2009-000796 10:39 1001 WHITEOAK RD BLDG G Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 11/07/2009 30046 2009-000797 11:56 375 S NEW ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 11/07/2009 30046 2009-000798 14:21 77 E HUNTINGTON CIR Good intent call, other 11/07/2009 30046 2009-000799 15:54 504 RIVER RD Brush or brush-and-grass mixture fire 11/07/2009 30046 2009-000800 19:21 650 VIESTA AVE Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 11/07/2009 30046 2009-000801 20:57 561 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 11/08/2009 30046 2009-000802 08:03 193 MAPLE GLEN DR Cooking fire, confined to container 11/08/2009 30046 2009-000803 10:02 547 BUCKSON DR Good intent call, other 11/08/2009 30046 2009-000804 16:24 KENTON RD Medical assist, assist EMS crew 11/09/2009 30046 2009-000805 01:17 330 Westwind dr Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 11/10/2009 30046 2009-000806 06:06 705 N DUPONT HWY Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 11/10/2009 30046 2009-000807 13:32 986 WHATCOAT DR 33 Trash or rubbish fire, contained 11/11/2009 30046 2009-000808 00:17 1710 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 11/11/2009 30046 2009-000809 20:22 101 BABB DR Cooking fire, confined to container 11/12/2009 30046 2009-000810 07:47 413 ALDER RD False alarm or false call, other

11/13/2009 30046 2009-000811 08:56 1450 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 11/13/2009 30046 2009-000812 19:56 204 SPRINGFIELD WAY Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 11/13/2009 30046 2009-000813 20:04 184 WILLIS RD B Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 11/14/2009 30046 2009-000814 00:21 1300 S. FARMVIEW DRIVE, APT G27 Building fire 11/14/2009 30046 2009-000815 10:11 1368 ROSE VALLEY SCHOOL RD Rescue, EMS incident, other 11/14/2009 30046 2009-000816 13:46 3185 FORREST AVE Good intent call, other 11/14/2009 30046 2009-000817 17:38 137 MCBRY DR Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 11/15/2009 30046 2009-000818 11:25 163 ACORN LA Smoke or odor removal 11/16/2009 30046 2009-000819 02:50 820 CARVEL DR I System malfunction, other 11/16/2009 30046 2009-000820 04:16 138 KENTWOOD DR Fire in mobile home used as fixed residence 11/16/2009 30046 2009-000821 08:23 401 FEDERAL ST Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 11/16/2009 30046 2009-000822 15:19 SR1 SR1 S/O DAFB LANDING LIGHTS MM 50 Good intent call, other 11/16/2009 30046 2009-000823 20:01 1300 INDEPENDENCE BLVD J24 Public service assistance, other 11/17/2009 30046 2009-000824 02:28 2298 Forrest ave Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 11/17/2009 30046 2009-000825 17:57 92 PUGH AVE Service Call, other 11/17/2009 30046 2009-000826 19:08 2 STEWART CT Cooking fire, confined to container 11/18/2009 30046 2009-000827 09:54 S. DUPONT HIGHWAY Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 11/19/2009 30046 2009-000828 13:34 6 ARBOR DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 11/20/2009 30046 2009-000829 06:52 992 WHATCOAT DR Passenger vehicle fire 11/20/2009 30046 2009-000830 19:46 826 S BRADFORD ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 11/21/2009 30046 2009-000831 02:42 151 ROOSEVELT AVE Medical assist, assist EMS crew 11/21/2009 30046 2009-000832 11:40 1679 S state st Vicinity alarm (incident in other location) 11/21/2009 30046 2009-000833 17:15 COURT ST Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 11/22/2009 30046 2009-000834 19:20 411 S QUEEN ST Good intent call, other 11/22/2009 30046 2009-000835 19:36 480 COUNTRY DR Good intent call, other 11/23/2009 30046 2009-000836 18:49 21 W LOOCKERMAN ST Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 11/23/2009 30046 2009-000837 19:14 737 S HALSEY RD Cooking fire, confined to container 11/24/2009 30046 2009-000838 02:45 116 SHINNECOCK RD Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO

11/24/2009 30046 2009-000839 15:29 1200 N DUPONT HWY Passenger vehicle fire 11/25/2009 30046 2009-000840 10:10 110 S NEW ST Cooking fire, confined to container 11/25/2009 30046 2009-000841 15:38 787 BACON AVE Cooking fire, confined to container 11/25/2009 30046 2009-000842 19:42 787 BACON AVE Cooking fire, confined to container 11/26/2009 30046 2009-000843 06:15 1001 WHITEOAK RD BLDG B Passenger vehicle fire 11/26/2009 30046 2009-000844 14:22 332 LOCUST POINT PL Cooking fire, confined to container 11/26/2009 30046 2009-000845 14:24 479 RIVER RD Cooking fire, confined to container 11/26/2009 30046 2009-000846 15:43 561 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 11/26/2009 30046 2009-000847 16:09 132 MATTERHORN DR Cooking fire, confined to container 11/26/2009 30046 2009-000848 18:15 362 FIDDLERS GREEN Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 11/27/2009 30046 2009-000849 07:01 1368 ROSE VALLEY SCHOOL RD Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 11/27/2009 30046 2009-000850 13:23 43 ROUNDTREE DR EAST Good intent call, other 11/27/2009 30046 2009-000851 16:59 222 W DIVISION ST Good intent call, other 11/27/2009 30046 2009-000852 21:54 956 WHATCOAT DR Smoke or odor removal 11/27/2009 30046 2009-000853 22:58 931 BUCK DR CO detector activation due to malfunction 11/28/2009 30046 2009-000854 13:12 N DUPONT HWY Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 11/29/2009 30046 2009-000855 12:38 2020 SHARON HILL RD System malfunction, other 11/29/2009 30046 2009-000856 13:09 625 NIMITZ RD System malfunction, other 11/29/2009 30046 2009-000857 15:37 691 ROBERTA AVE System malfunction, other 11/29/2009 30046 2009-000858 15:49 561 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 11/29/2009 30046 2009-000859 21:55 106 MIFFLIN RD Forest, woods or wildland fire 11/30/2009 30046 2009-000860 06:28 1574 N DUPONT HWY Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 11/30/2009 30046 2009-000861 13:01 895 SCHOOLHOUSE LN Outside rubbish fire, other 12/01/2009 30046 2009-000862 16:34 1300 S FARMVIEW DR E Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 12/01/2009 30046 2009-000863 18:34 20 Washington st Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 12/01/2009 30046 2009-000864 19:11 329 Northdown Dr Cooking fire, confined to container 12/01/2009 30046 2009-000865 20:24 820 CARVEL DR H System malfunction, other 12/02/2009 30046 2009-000866 14:53 160 STONEY DR Hazardous condition, other

12/03/2009 30046 2009-000867 18:52 820 CARVEL DR H Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 12/04/2009 30046 2009-000868 15:33 111 S WEST ST Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 12/05/2009 30046 2009-000869 15:26 SCARBROUGH RD EXIT 104 S/B LANE Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 12/05/2009 30046 2009-000870 15:35 SR1 & MAIN TOLL PLAZA Motor vehicle accident with injuries 12/05/2009 30046 2009-000871 21:32 195 COMMERCE WAY Building fire 12/06/2009 30046 2009-000872 11:20 1300 S FARMVIEW DR F Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 12/06/2009 30046 2009-000873 12:15 51 WEBBS LA D Cooking fire, confined to container 12/06/2009 30046 2009-000874 13:40 826 S BRADFORD ST Cooking fire, confined to container 12/06/2009 30046 2009-000875 15:09 1463 CHESTNUT GROVE RD Rescue, EMS incident, other 12/07/2009 30046 2009-000876 13:31 W north st Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 12/07/2009 30046 2009-000877 16:23 230 Presidents dr Building or structure weakened or collapsed 12/07/2009 30046 2009-000878 16:53 60 STEVENSON DR Hazardous condition, other 12/07/2009 30046 2009-000879 18:57 1710 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 12/08/2009 30046 2009-000880 14:02 1152 Years CO detector activation due to malfunction 12/08/2009 30046 2009-000881 16:24 SR1 SR1 @ MAIN TOLL PLAZA MM 63 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 12/08/2009 30046 2009-000882 17:42 1121 FORREST AVE Cooking fire, confined to container 12/08/2009 30046 2009-000883 21:28 908 WOODCREST DR Local alarm system, malicious false alarm 12/09/2009 30046 2009-000884 11:59 430 COLLEGE RD 100 Building fire 12/10/2009 30046 2009-000885 04:12 26 Richard blvd Building fire 12/10/2009 30046 2009-000886 15:35 200 E CAMDEN WYOMING AVE Cover assignment, standby, moveup 12/11/2009 30046 2009-000887 04:53 1200 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other 12/11/2009 30046 2009-000888 07:07 1300 S FARMVIEW DR F Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 12/11/2009 30046 2009-000889 13:36 S Dupont Service Call, other 12/11/2009 30046 2009-000890 23:03 ASBURY AVE Fire, other 12/12/2009 30046 2009-000891 04:50 511 N BRADFORD ST CO detector activation due to malfunction 12/12/2009 30046 2009-000892 08:52 S LOOCKERMAN ST Dispatched & canceled en route 12/12/2009 30046 2009-000893 10:10 245 S DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 12/12/2009 30046 2009-000894 14:32 139 S STATE ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction

12/13/2009 30046 2009-000895 18:04 30 HOYLAKE CT Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 12/14/2009 30046 2009-000896 02:56 1061 N DUPONT HWY Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 12/14/2009 30046 2009-000897 08:58 426 S STATE ST Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 12/14/2009 30046 2009-000898 15:25 76 BEACON HILL DR Cooking fire, confined to container 12/14/2009 30046 2009-000899 18:04 787 BACON AVE Cooking fire, confined to container 12/14/2009 30046 2009-000900 19:28 1706 N. DUPONT HIGHWAY Cooking fire, confined to container 12/14/2009 30046 2009-000901 21:26 36 SACKARACKIN AV Building fire 12/15/2009 30046 2009-000902 19:17 116 HIAWATHA LN Good intent call, other 12/17/2009 30046 2009-000903 19:23 956 WHATCOAT DR Vicinity alarm (incident in other location) 12/17/2009 30046 2009-000904 20:47 584 PERSIMMON TREE LA Special outside fire, other 12/18/2009 30046 2009-000905 14:47 117 WYOMING AVE Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 12/18/2009 30046 2009-000906 18:27 1679 S state st A18 Lock-out 12/18/2009 30046 2009-000907 19:02 1165 N DUPONT HWY 1 System malfunction, other 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000908 10:53 50 CARNOUSTIE RD Carbon monoxide incident 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000909 12:07 251 GREENWICH DRIVE Service Call, other 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000910 16:39 22 GRISTMILL DR Service Call, other 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000911 17:59 986 WHATCOAT DR False alarm or false call, other 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000912 18:00 3376 WEST DENNYS Hazardous condition, other 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000913 18:07 1685 S STATE ST 5 Severe weather or natural disaster, other 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000914 18:07 151 ROOSEVELT AVE B9 Severe weather or natural disaster, other 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000915 19:04 1300 S FARMVIEW DR F Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000916 19:09 485 WINDING CREEK RD Outside rubbish fire, other 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000917 20:56 240 TRAFALGAR DR Assist police or other governmental agency 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000918 23:06 247 KENTWOOD DR Public service 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000919 23:12 LINCOLN ST Dispatched & canceled en route 12/19/2009 30046 2009-000920 23:25 50 GLEN ST Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 12/20/2009 30046 2009-000921 00:22 BOGGS DR Assist police or other governmental agency 12/20/2009 30046 2009-000922 07:56 6 BELLRIVE CT Good intent call, other

12/20/2009 30046 2009-000923 09:20 400 HIAWATHA LA Public service assistance, other 12/20/2009 30046 2009-000924 10:23 949 WESTVIEW TERR Public service 12/20/2009 30046 2009-000925 13:32 23 CATHY AVE Public service 12/20/2009 30046 2009-000926 15:48 801 OTIS DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 12/20/2009 30046 2009-000927 16:00 26 THE GREEN False alarm or false call, other 12/20/2009 30046 2009-000928 17:06 137 MCBRY DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 12/20/2009 30046 2009-000929 17:16 801 OTIS DR System malfunction, other 12/21/2009 30046 2009-000930 07:23 400 COURT ST Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 12/21/2009 30046 2009-000931 17:39 Kenton Rd Service Call, other 12/21/2009 30046 2009-000932 19:03 1225 WALKER RD System malfunction, other 12/21/2009 30046 2009-000933 23:33 SCARBOUROUGH Good intent call, other 12/21/2009 30046 2009-000934 23:53 496 ARTIS DR Medical assist, assist EMS crew 12/22/2009 30046 2009-000935 08:00 966 SUNSET TERR Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 12/22/2009 30046 2009-000936 18:37 411 N BRADFORD Building fire 12/22/2009 30046 2009-000937 22:26 561 N DUPONT HWY False alarm or false call, other 12/24/2009 30046 2009-000938 01:48 271 SHEFFIELD DR No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 12/24/2009 30046 2009-000939 22:49 123 LADYBUG DR Hazardous condition, other 12/25/2009 30046 2009-000940 11:44 430 COLLEGE RD 600 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 12/25/2009 30046 2009-000941 11:56 765 BACON AVE Water problem, other 12/25/2009 30046 2009-000942 13:25 221 N NEW ST Cooking fire, confined to container 12/25/2009 30046 2009-000943 14:44 323 COLUMBIA AVE Good intent call, other 12/25/2009 30046 2009-000944 18:45 128 ALONZO DR Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 12/26/2009 30046 2009-000945 09:53 1165 N DUPONT HWY 3 System malfunction, other 12/26/2009 30046 2009-000946 11:00 1165 N DUPONT HWY 3 Service Call, other 12/26/2009 30046 2009-000947 21:49 30 HOYLAKE CT Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 12/27/2009 30046 2009-000948 04:35 46 S BRADFORD ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 12/27/2009 30046 2009-000949 09:03 46 S BRADFORD ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 12/27/2009 30046 2009-000950 14:54 101 KURT DR Gas leak (natural gas or LPG)

12/27/2009 30046 2009-000951 17:48 430 KENT Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 12/27/2009 30046 2009-000952 19:02 134 N. AMERICAN AVE Fire, other 12/28/2009 30046 2009-000953 03:04 66 WICK ST Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 12/28/2009 30046 2009-000954 05:43 55 LINCOLN ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 12/28/2009 30046 2009-000955 16:24 40 VIRGINIA AVE Cooking fire, confined to container 12/28/2009 30046 2009-000956 18:07 1703 E LEBANON RD Rescue, EMS incident, other 12/29/2009 30046 2009-000957 18:39 640 LAFFERTY LA Steam, other gas mistaken for smoke, other 12/29/2009 30046 2009-000958 19:53 PERSIMMON TREE LA Cover assignment, standby, moveup 12/30/2009 30046 2009-000959 13:12 1061 N DUPONT HWY Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 12/30/2009 30046 2009-000960 13:45 111 BURNING TREE RD Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 12/30/2009 30046 2009-000961 16:18 24 FREEDOM DR Smoke or odor removal Total Incidents: 960

FIRE DEPARTMENT APPARATUS 2007 - Car 1 - Chevrolet Tahoe Car 1 is utilized by the Fire Chief. It contains a, mapping and preplanning information, 1 MSA Air Pack, assorted, mobile command/accountability. 2008 - Car 2 - Chevrolet Tahoe Car 2 is rotated between the Deputy Chief, and Assistant Chiefs assigned as the On Duty Officer. It contains a laptop with mapping and preplanning information. 2001 - Brush 9 Ford F-350 Super Duty 4x4 200 Gallon Poly tank 180 GPM Hale Pump 200' 1" pre-connect booster reel 9,000 lb Warn Winch Assorted small hand tools 2 man cab

FIRE DEPARTMENT APPARATUS PAGE 2 2006 - Utility 1- Ford F-350 Super Duty Utility 1 is a Ford F-350 Super Duty pickup. It holds a crew of 6 and is primarily used for towing Marine 1 and the Foam Trailer. 2004 - Foam Unit (FD 46-13) Foam Trailer 1990 - Marine 1 Polar Kraft Mfg. Co Inc. Modified Flat Bottom

FIRE DEPARTMENT APPARATUS PAGE 3 2008 - Engine 2 - Pierce Pumper 750 gallon water tank 50 gallon foam tank 1500 GPM pump 2003 - Engine 3 - Pierce 1,000 gallon water tank 2,000 GPM 2 stage Hale Pump 1,000' 5" supply line 600' 3" hose 200' 2 1/2" pre-connect line with smooth bore (3) 200' 1 3/4 pre-connects Holmatro Portable Rescue System 6 man cab 2005 - Engine 4 - - Pierce 1,000 gallon water tank 2,000 GPM 2 stage Hale pump 1,000' 5" line 600' 3" hose 200' 2 1/2" pre-connect (3) 200' 1 3/4" pre-connect Holmatro Portable Rescue System 6 man cab

FIRE DEPARTMENT APPARATUS PAGE 4 2003 - Engine 6 - Pierce 1,000 gallon water tank 2,000 GPM 2 stage Hale Pump 1,000' 5" supply line 600' 3" hose 200' 2 1/2" pre-connect line with smooth bore (3) 200' 1 3/4 pre-connects Holmatro portable Rescue System 6 man cab 1997 - Engine 7- Pierce Dash 1,000 gallon water tank 2,000 GPM 2 stage Hale Pump 1,000' 5" supply line 600' 3" hose (3) 200' 1 3/4 pre-connects 200' 1" pre-connect booster line 200' 2 1/2" pre connect line Holmatro Portable Rescue System 6 man cab 2001 - Ladder 1 - Spartan Tractor 100' LTI Ariel Ladder Cascade system Stokes Basket Assorted Ground Ladders and poles 7 man crew

FIRE DEPARTMENT APPARATUS PAGE 5 2005 - Ladder 2 - Pierce 100' Tower Ladder Stokes Basket Cascade System Rope/Water Rescue Equipment K12 & cutters edge saws Assorted ground ladders and poles 1997 - Rescue 1 - Pierce Lance

January 16, 2009, Earle Teat Music - Firefighters battled frigid weather and icy conditions making fire ground operations extremely complex. As a result of the fire, over $1M in structural damage and property loss occurred. February 8, 2009, Cedar Chase Apartments - Three story multiple family dwelling with heavy fire venting from entire roof and third floor area. As a result of the fire, over $1M in structural damage and property loss occurred.

December 22, 2009 - Bradford Street – 2.5 story duplex – fire in rear of building, kitchen area – Fire displaced two adults and three children. August 30, 2009 - Fulton Street Extended – 1.5 story, single family dwelling – crews battled fire from outside after being called out due to structural failure.

Dispatcher Greg Parsell 15 Years of Full Time Service Dispatcher Chris Jacobs 12 Years of Full Time Service

Dispatcher Jason Osika 8 Years of Full Time Service Dispatcher Trey Small 3 Years of Full Time Service

Dispatcher Matt Carey 2 Years of Full Time Service

The Dover Fire Department offered the opportunity to City Council, Department Heads and Local Officials to “Walk in the Boots of a Dover Firefighter”…….. A first-hand experience of what the firefighters of the Dover Fire Department do on a routine basis.

City of Dover Capital Investment Plan Project Tracking Report April 30, 2010 Points to Remember - * Original Project Budget = Original Total Project Budget initially included in approved annual budget. * Latest Project Budget = Revised Total Project Budget included in most recent approved annual budget or one of the following: bond resolution, revolving fund loan agreement, Council approved budget amendment, or City Manager approved amendment as per the Budget Amendment Procedure. * Current Fiscal Year - Revised Fiscal Year Budget = Current Year approved project budgets plus carry forward balances of unspent budgets in the prior fiscal year. Project Carry Forward balances will be submitted to City Council for amendment in January 2010. Can also be amended with City Manager approval per the Budget Amendment Procedure. * Water Quality, Inflow/Infiltration, Distribution Upgrades and New Development projects are budgeted as a blanket project and once individual projects are identified and estimated they are created using an allocation of the overall budgeted amount. Examples are Water Quality - Pear Street; New Developments - Kent County Lighting; Distribution Upgrades - Crossgates; * The FY10 Budget for Community Transportation & Streets $350,000 is expected to change based on the State of the City Review. * Status and Comments provided by City Manager. * For Finance purposes projects are considered completed when placed in service and all charges have been processed. Community Water & Total Current Year Budget Funding Sources General Transportation Wastewater Electric CIP Beginning Budget Balance $ 375,408 $ - $ 699 $ 36,619 $ 412,726 Federal &/or State Grants 4,180,234 1,000,000 45,248 240,875 5,466,357 Revolving Fund Loans - - 8,346,498 - 8,346,498 Bond Proceeds 1,912,433 - - 4,240,034 6,152,467 Impact Fees - - 518,230 - 518,230 State Funds (FY09 Carry Forward Gov Ave) - - - 710,318 710,318 Parkland Reserve 40,000 - - - 40,000 Library Reserve & Contributions 3,180,235 - 3,180,235 Transfer from Operating Funds 344,802 472,690 700,000 961,012 2,478,504 Interest Earned 2,700 - - 33,700 36,400 Project Carry Forward Balances 51,006 - 1,094,697 2,652,769 3,798,472 Total Funding Sources (Unaudited) $ 10,086,818 $ 1,472,690 $ 10,705,372 $ 8,875,327 $ 31,140,207 Page 1 of 5

City of Dover General Fund - Major CIP Projects April, 2010 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project Current Revised Fiscal Project Project To Date Budget % Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD % Budget Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments FY2008 M Park Improvement Program $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 28,734 $ 1,266 95.8% $ - $ 30,000 $ 28,734 0.0% Complete Basketball court repaved. Totals - FY08 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 28,734 $ 1,266 95.8% $ - $ 30,000 $ 28,734 0.0% FY2009 M/G New Library Project $ 18,200,000 $ 24,679,934 $ 1,099,552 $ 23,580,382 4.5% $ 8,912,433 $ 9,272,902 $ 362,486 4.1% Started Starting Construction Documents. Totals - FY09 $ 18,200,000 $ 24,679,934 $ 1,099,552 $ 23,580,382 4.5% $ 8,912,433 $ 9,272,902 $ 362,486 4.1% FY2010 Vehicles & Equipment $ 372,910 $ 372,910 $ 265,261 $ 107,649 71.1% $ 372,910 $ 393,916 $ 265,261 71.1% Complete Includes DFD payment & Police grants. Contractor complete, will do some in house Concrete Program 50,000 50,000 40,627 9,373 81.3% 50,000 50,000 40,627 81.3% Complete repairs. Pitts Center Addition 50,000 50,000 - 50,000 0.0% - 40,000 - 0.0% Started Construction started. Transfer to CT Fund 300,000 300,000 - 300,000 0.0% 300,000 300,000 - 0.0% N/A Totals - FY10 $ 772,910 $ 772,910 $ 305,888 $ 467,022 39.6% $ 722,910 $ 783,916 $ 305,888 42.3% Grand Totals $ 19,002,910 $ 25,482,844 $ 1,434,173 $ 24,048,671 5.6% $ 9,635,343 $ 10,086,818 $ 697,107 7.2% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is rebudgeted to start over each fiscal year. G = Grant funded project Page 2 of 5

City of Dover Community Transportation & General Fund Street Funds - Major CIP Projects April, 2010 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project Current Revised Fiscal Project Project To Date Budget % Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD % Budget Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget (1) Expenses Spent Status Comments FY 2002 North Street Sidewalk $ 80,416 $ 80,416 $ - $ 80,416 0.0% $ - $ 80,416 $ - 0.0% Not started Work on hold pending Collegiate decision. Totals $ 80,416 $ 80,416 $ - $ 80,416 0.0% $ - $ 80,416 $ - 0.0% FY 2005 Dover Little League Parking Lot Awaiting DELDOT/staff decision on re- Phase II $ 14,906 $ 14,906 $ 3,332 $ 11,574 22.4% $ - $ 11,574 $ - 0.0% Done appropriation of available funds. Totals $ 14,906 $ 14,906 $ 3,332 $ 11,574 22.4% $ - $ 11,574 $ - 0.0% - FY 2006 M Lincoln Park Center $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 294,062 $ 105,938 73.5% $ - $ 147,275 $ 41,337 28.1% Started Ongoing. Totals $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 294,062 $ 105,938 73.5% $ - $ 147,275 $ 41,337 0.0% - - FY 2007 10% received from State, not part of street program. Separate contract do to E. Water Street Brick Sidewalk $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - $ 65,000 0.0% $ - $ 65,000 $ - 0.0% Not started nature of work. Totals $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - $ 65,000 0.0% $ - $ 65,000 $ - 0.0% FY 2009 Spruance Road - White Oak to Maple Parkway $ 141,000 $ 141,000 $ 101,464 $ 39,536 72.0% $ - $ 101,465 $ 101,464 100.0% Started Work in progress. Spruance Road - Maple Parkway to East Division 125,400 125,400 120,309 5,091 95.9% - 120,309 120,309 100.0% Started Work in progress. Various FY09 Streets 225,000 225,000 185,000 40,000 82.2% - 85,000 45,000 52.9% Started Independence & Greenway started. Schutte Park 21,950 21,950 - 21,950 0.0% - 21,950 - 0.0% Not Started Scheduled FY 2009. Woodsedge Road 75,000 75,000 113,234 (38,234) 151.0% - 113,234 113,234 100.0% Not Started Scheduled FY 2009. Various Streets 206,287 206,287 - 206,287 0.0% - 206,287 - 0.0% Not Started Scheduled FY 2009. Westover Landscaping 2,500 2,500 1,451 1,049 58.0% - 2,500 1,451 58.0% Work is done Totals $ 797,137 $ 797,137 $ 521,458 $ 275,679 65.4% $ - $ 650,745 $ 381,458 58.6% FY 2010 Street & Alley Program $ 350,000 $ 522,690 $ 30,895 491,795 5.9% $ 350,000 $ 472,690 $ 30,895 6.5% Not Started Original Budget should be $300,000. Budgeted CT Agreements FY10 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 0.0% 1,000,000 44,990 - 0.0% Not Started No fiscal FY10 agreements signed. Totals $ 1,350,000 $ 1,522,690 $ 30,895 $ 1,491,795 2.0% $ 1,350,000 $ 517,680 $ 30,895 6.0% Grand Totals $ 2,707,459 $ 2,880,149 $ 849,747 $ 2,030,402 29.5% $ 1,350,000 $ 1,472,690 $ 453,690 30.8% Legend - M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is rebudgeted to start over each fiscal year. Page 3 of 5

City of Dover Water/Wastewater Improvement & Extension Fund - Major CIP Projects April, 2010 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project % Approved Revised Fiscal % Project Project To Date Budget Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD Budget Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments FY 2008 South Governors Ave. Water Main Upgrade $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 2,664 $ 197,336 1.3% $ - $ 200,000 $ 2,664 1.3% Started Water lines done, doing service lines and hydrants. M 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tower 4,196,600 2,590,000 4,830 2,585,170 0.2% 200,000 196,255 1,085 0.6% Started Selecting Tank Model & Site; FY11 = Constr. M Piney Point Well 398,800 665,000 52,475 612,525 7.9% - 185,455 22,930 12.4% Started Applying for permits; FY11 = Constr. M South Governors Ave. Sewer Main 300,000 291,000 10,514 280,486 3.6% - 281,088 602 0.2% Started Construction North of Wyoming. M/SL US 13 East Sanitary Sewer Interceptor 2,376,800 3,409,641 395,236 3,014,405 11.6% 3,201,480 3,362,481 187,075 5.6% Started 19% of line installed. M Lafferty Lane Package P/S Replacement 230,000 374,369 418,833 (44,464) 111.9% - - 26,269 0.0% Completed In service. O/S Encumbrance $26,269. Totals - FY08 $ 7,702,200 $ 7,530,010 $ 884,552 $ 6,645,458 11.7% $ 3,401,480 $ 4,225,279 $ 240,625 5.7% FY2009 Washington Street $ 492,800 $ 310,100 $ 310,063 $ 37 100.0% $ - $ - $ - 0.0% Completed Pear Street 759,100 653,804 448,180 205,624 68.5% - 331,900 126,276 38.0% Completed South Street 120,800 79,800 37,469 42,331 47.0% - - - 0.0% Completed Contact Chambers - residual analyzers 100,000 113,800 95,484 18,316 83.9% - - - 0.0% Completed M/SL Bayard Avenue 590,910 590,910 6,490 584,420 1.1% 533,510 584,420 - 0.0% Started Council approved bid. M/SL East side N. State Street 868,707 876,703 29,003 847,700 3.3% 846,807 847,700 - 0.0% Started Council approved bid. M/SL Route 13 Water Main 1,058,700 1,091,797 116,824 974,973 10.7% 1,023,700 1,024,400 49,427 4.8% Started Going to bid. R Water Quality Improvements FY09 $ 3,991,017 $ 3,716,914 $ 1,043,513 $ 2,673,401 28.1% $ 2,404,017 $ 2,788,420 $ 175,703 42.9% Started See above. M/SL DE State University Pumping Station Repl. $ 386,400 $ 386,400 $ 38,177 $ 348,223 9.9% $ 336,400 $ 360,473 $ 12,250 3.4% Started Material ordered - August completion. M/SL Fox Hall/Retreat Force Main Rerouting 133,100 139,245 44,378 94,867 31.9% 107,200 107,200 12,333 11.5% Completed Done. M/SL Acorn Lane Pump Station Replace. 386,400 386,400 39,397 347,003 10.2% 336,400 359,823 12,820 3.6% Started Material ordered - August completion. Totals - FY09 $ 4,896,917 $ 4,628,959 $ 1,165,465 $ 3,463,494 25.2% $ 3,184,017 $ 3,615,916 $ 213,106 5.9% FY2010 Vehicles & Equipment $ 55,600 $ 66,310 $ 62,730 $ 3,580 94.6% $ 55,600 $ 66,310 $ 62,730 94.6% Completed Vehicles and equipment in service. Water Quality - McKee Run Plant 100,000 100,000 92,125 7,875 92.1% 100,000 100,000 92,125 92.1% Completed Done. M Water Quality - Walker Road 100,000 100,000 23,750 76,250 0.0% 100,000 100,000 23,750 23.8% Started In Design-survey only, in house design. R Wellhead Redevelopment Program 55,000 70,250 70,238 12 100.0% 55,000 70,250 70,238 100.0% Completed Done. Remote Control & Monitor Wells 55,000 55,000 23,104 31,896 42.0% 55,000 55,000 23,104 42.0% Started Radio in, installation next. R Misc. Distribution System Replacements 65,000 49,750 21,188 28,562 42.6% 65,000 49,750 21,188 42.6% Not Started Ongoing, as needed. M Inflow/Infiltration Removal 1,800,000 1,800,000 733 1,799,267 0.0% 1,800,000 1,800,000 733 0.0% Started Bidding complete in June. R Scada Technology Equip Upgrade 79,300 79,300 64,149 15,151 80.9% 79,300 79,300 64,149 80.9% Started Done. M Del. State Univ. Force Main Rerouting 137,700 137,700 - 137,700 0.0% 26,800 26,800 - 0.0% Started Being designed by Kent County. M Fox Hall Pump Station 427,900 427,900 - 427,900 0.0% 52,000 52,000 - 0.0% Started Design only, awarded to Braun Engineering. M Heatherfield Pumping Station Upgrade 220,400 220,400 - 220,400 0.0% 40,000 40,000 - 0.0% Started Design only, awarded to Braun Engineering. I Tar Ditch Interceptor Upgrade 518,230 518,230 - 518,230 0.0% 518,230 518,230 - 0.0% Started Design only, awarded to Braun Engineering. R Misc. Sewer System Improvements 33,000 22,290 - 22,290 0.0% 33,000 22,290 7,969 35.7% Not Started Ongoing, as needed. Various Pump Motor Replacements 45,248 45,248 - 45,248 0.0% - 45,248 - 0.0% Started Grant approved, ordering will begin. Totals - FY10 $ 3,692,378 $ 3,692,378 $ 358,017 $ 3,334,361 9.7% $ 2,979,930 $ 3,025,178 $ 365,986 12.1% Grand Totals $ 16,291,495 $ 15,851,347 $ 2,408,034 $ 13,443,313 15.2% $ 9,565,427 $ 10,866,373 $ 819,717 7.5% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is rebudgeted to start over each fiscal year. SL = State Loan Project - construction phase is financed I = Impact Fee Financed Project Page 4 of 5

City of Dover Electric Improvement & Extension Fund - Major CIP Projects April, 2010 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project % Current Revised Fiscal % Project Project To Date Budget Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD Budget Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments FY 2006 M/B 69 KV feeders 3 and 4 $ 11,060,000 $ 8,693,782 $ 8,628,675 $ 65,107 99.3% $ - $ 537,859 $ 472,752 87.9% Done In service. Completed south of Wyoming. M/S Governor's Avenue Rebuild 1,268,450 2,068,260 510,711 1,557,549 24.7% - 1,629,658 72,109 4.4% Started Conduit in, up to Waples. Totals - FY06 $ 12,328,450 $ 10,762,042 $ 9,139,387 $ 1,622,655 84.9% $ - $ 2,167,517 $ 544,861 25.1% FY 2008 Unit 3 Turb Bearing Fire Protect Work to start in July. Deluge $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 0.0% $ - $ 50,000 $ - 0.0% Started M/B Horsepond Road Substation 1,020,000 1,029,397 1,029,397 0 100.0% - - - 0.0% Completed In service. McKee Run Unit 3 Pollution M/B Done. Remediation & Fuel Testing 3,000,000 2,914,910 2,746,932 167,978 94.2% - 300,580 132,602 44.1% Completed M/B St. Jones Substation 5,376,068 5,955,878 5,955,878 (0) 100.0% - 79,692 79,692 100.0% Completed In service. Totals - FY08 $ 9,446,068 $ 9,950,185 $ 9,732,207 $ 217,978 97.8% $ - $ 430,272 $ 212,294 49.3% FY2009 Danner Farm Transformer $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 32,971 $ 12,029 73.3% $ - $ 21,417 $ 9,388 43.8% Completed Done. Distribution Upgrades - Schoolview 100,000 175,000 174,335 665 99.6% - 16,398 15,733 95.9% Completed Complete for year. McKee & VanSant Arc Flash 125,000 125,000 41,000 84,000 32.8% 75,000 75,000 - 0.0% Started Should be done in June. Totals - FY09 $ 270,000 $ 345,000 $ 248,306 $ 96,694 205.7% $ 75,000 $ 112,815 $ 25,121 33.5% FY2010 Vehicles & Equipment $ 347,042 $ 452,765 $ 372,814 $ 79,951 82.3% $ 347,042 $ 452,765 $ 372,814 82.3% Completed Truck and Equipment in service. B Vansant CT Mark IV Control (Replmnt) 700,000 610,000 265,933 344,067 43.6% 700,000 610,000 265,933 43.6% Completed In service. B Plant Driveway 240,000 240,000 - 240,000 0.0% 240,000 240,000 - 0.0% Started July complettion. R Misc. Upgrades 51,000 51,000 13,371 37,629 26.2% 51,000 51,000 13,371 26.2% Started Ongoing, as needed. McKee Run Smoke/Heat Detection 55,000 55,000 21,200 33,800 38.5% 55,000 55,000 21,200 38.5% Completed Completed. Work Mgmt. System R leplacement 85,000 85,000 83 84,917 0.1% 85,000 85,000 83 0.1% Started June completion. l Unit 3 Remove Cyclone Separators 51,000 80,000 822 79,178 1.0% 51,000 80,000 822 1.0% Completed Done. Unit 2 Remove Cyclone Separators 36,000 20,000 822 19,178 4.1% 36,000 20,000 822 4.1% Completed Done. Unit 1 Remove Cyclone Separators 36,000 20,000 822 19,178 4.1% 36,000 20,000 822 4.1% Completed Done. 10 KW Photovoltaic @ McKee 65,065 65,065 - 65,065 0.0% - 65,065 - 0.0% Started Material ordered. S LED Lighting Replacement 70,087 70,087 - 70,087 0.0% - 70,087 - 0.0% Started Contract for LED's being spec'd. R UG Transformers 156,570 156,570 64,299 92,271 41.1% 156,570 156,570 64,299 41.1% Started Ongoing, as needed. R UG Conductors 457,780 457,780 282,786 174,994 61.8% 457,780 438,780 282,786 64.4% Started Ongoing, as needed. R Kent County Lighting Project 216,950 216,950 40,777 176,173 18.8% 216,950 216,950 40,777 18.8% Started Working in Fairfield. R Single & 3 Phase Meters 50,000 50,000 17,618 32,382 35.2% 50,000 50,000 17,618 35.2% Started Ongoing as needed. Total New Developments 881,300 881,300 405,478 475,822 46.0% 881,300 862,300 405,478 47.0% R Lighting Improvements & Rehab 50,000 50,000 37,561 12,439 75.1% 50,000 69,000 37,561 54.4% Started June completion planned. R Replacement of 69KV Breakers 183,000 183,000 163,418 19,582 89.3% 183,000 183,000 163,418 89.3% Completed Done for year. R Replace SS Equipment (as required) 40,000 40,000 4,786 35,214 12.0% 40,000 47,425 4,786 10.1% Started Ongoing, as needed. R Distribution Capacitors 120,000 120,000 18,887 101,113 15.7% 120,000 120,000 18,887 15.7% Dropped Dropped, no longer needed. M/B Mid City Substation 1,488,461 1,213,711 600,224 613,487 49.5% 1,593,461 1,213,711 600,224 49.5% Completed In service. R PT & CT Replacement 260,880 260,880 135,790 125,090 52.1% 260,880 260,880 135,790 52.1% Completed Material only this year. R Transmission & Switches 23,000 23,000 10,332 12,668 44.9% 23,000 15,575 10,332 66.3% Started Ongoing as needed. R Upgrade Trans., Distr. Lines 351,096 351,096 185,266 165,830 52.8% 351,096 351,096 185,266 52.8% Started Ongoing as needed. B Crossgates 396,904 483,075 401,842 81,233 83.2% 396,904 483,075 401,842 83.2% Started Line burial ongoing. B Buchanan Acres 406,000 406,000 598,632 (192,632) 147.4% 406,000 662,543 598,632 90.4% Started Line burial ongoing. Total Distribution Upgrades 1,154,000 1,240,171 1,185,740 54,431 95.6% 1,154,000 1,496,714 1,185,740 79.2% In Kent Acres & S. of Dover. Totals - FY10 $ 6,768,135 $ 6,592,279 $ 3,625,944 $ 2,966,335 55.0% $ 5,906,683 $ 6,017,522 $ 3,238,084 53.8% Grand Totals $ 28,812,653 $ 27,649,506 $ 22,745,844 $ 4,903,662 82.3% $ 5,981,683 $ 8,728,126 $ 4,020,360 46.1% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is rebudgeted to start over each fiscal year. B = Bonded Project S = State fully or partially reimbursed project Page 5 of 5

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: City Council Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO.: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Police DATE SUBMITTED: 5/26/10 PREPARED BY: Captain Steven Getek / Administrative Division Commander SUBJECT: 2010 Office of Justice Programs (OJP) Justice Assistance Grant REFERENCE: Recurring Grant Funding RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: Committee EXHIBITS: N/A EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $86,575 AMOUNT BUDGETED: n/a FUNDING SOURCE: USDOJ Grant (as noted above) TIMETABLE: After approval is received from the Council, the Police Department will spend the funds according to the city purchasing policy. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend Council approve purchases at the June 28, 2010 session. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: The Dover Police Department recently received its annual allocation from the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) for the 2010 Justice Assistance Grant (JAG). Similar to previous years, Dover Police Department was identified as a disparate funding agency along with Smyrna Police Department and Kent County. There really is no disparate funding situation between the three entities because there is no law enforcement function at the county level. This is because law enforcement is provided by municipal police departments or the State Police for areas lying outside of incorporated limits within the county. In addition, the county also does not bear the cost for prosecution or incarceration that arises for Part 1 violent crimes since these costs are budgeted and paid for by the State of Delaware. The disparate condition above requires the submission of a joint grant application for the three agencies. Since Dover Police Department will be receiving the lion’s share of the amount, we will serve as the fiscal and administrative agent for the grant. This means that all funds for the grant will be disbursed through City of Dover accounts; however, Smyrna Police Department expenses will still be controlled and approved by the City of Smyrna. The table below shows the breakout of funds and the items the Dover Police Department plans to purchase with these funds. Dover Police Department Amount 1. Police Department website design $50,000 2. Supplemental computer upgrades and enhancements (not previously budgeted) 22,800 Subtotal $72,800 Smyrna Police Department $13,775 Grand Total $86,575

Notes on Dover Police Department Expenses:  Web Design Services ($50,000) – The city initiated a Request for Proposal package earlier this spring and received several bids from web design companies. Funding at the time was not secured for the Police Department portion, but the specifications for requirements were worked out by the working group that was put together for this project. The solicitation for this grant came up at the opportune time, so its funding will be used for this purpose.  Supplemental Computer Upgrades and Enhancements ($22,800) – The technological environment in Law Enforcement is constantly changing and the Police Department is often faced with finding funds to either troubleshoot or fix technology issues or incorporate new technology requirements passed down from State and Federal systems. Many of these changes do not occur in conjunction with the budget cycle. As a result, funds are not readily available, especially considering the current state of our national economy. These funds will help hedge these types of requirements in the future through the life of this grant.

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: City Council Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO.: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Police DATE SUBMITTED: 5/26/10 PREPARED BY: Captain Steven Getek / Administrative Division Commander SUBJECT: CIP Project PD1001 - Core Law Enforcement Server Replacements REFERENCE: FY10 CIP Budget, page 166 RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: Committee EXHIBITS: N/A EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $53,500 AMOUNT BUDGETED: $53,500 FUNDING SOURCE: FY10 CIP Budget, page 166 TIMETABLE: The Police Department is currently waiting for the final specifications for the computer servers from the vendor and will place the order immediately when they are received to meet the end of fiscal year deadline for these funds. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend Council approve purchases at the June 28, 2010 session. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: This project was already approved in the FY10 CIP budget. The project consists of the replacement of several servers that host the services platform for providing key law enforcement systems in dispatch, patrol, records and evidence. The systems are also accessed by all sworn personnel in processing complaints and calls for service. The vendors for this project will be New World for the main server software and Dell (state contract vendor) for the hardware. This action form is provided as information on the expenditures required since the dollar amount for the total project exceeds $25,000.

Notes on Dover Police Department Expenses:  Web Design Services ($50,000) – The city initiated a Request for Proposal package earlier this spring and received several bids from web design companies. Funding at the time was not secured for the Police Department portion, but the specifications for requirements were worked out by the working group that was put together for this project. The solicitation for this grant came up at the opportune time, so its funding will be used for this purpose.  Supplemental Computer Upgrades and Enhancements ($22,800) – The technological environment in Law Enforcement is constantly changing and the Police Department is often faced with finding funds to either troubleshoot or fix technology issues or incorporate new technology requirements passed down from State and Federal systems. Many of these changes do not occur in conjunction with the budget cycle. As a result, funds are not readily available, especially considering the current state of our national economy. These funds will help hedge these types of requirements in the future through the life of this grant.

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council AGENDA ITEM: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Services DATE SUBMITTED: 6/15/2010 PREPARED BY: Scott D. Koenig, P.E., Public Services Manager SUBJECT: Evaluation of Bids – FY-2011 Street Program REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: City Manager, Controller EXHIBITS: Attachment A – Unit Price Summary AMOUNT OF FUNDING AVAILABLE: $743,001.14 FUNDING SOURCES (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Multiple Funding Sources: $300,000 from the General Fund in FY-2011, $25,000 in private developer funds for Susan Place, $130,934 in Community Development Block Grant Funds, $144,000 in Community Transportation Funds and $143,067.14 in carryover of General Fund dollars from prior years; Page 77 in the CIP and Page 256 of the 2011 Draft Operating Budget. TIMETABLE: This is a unit price contract starting with the date of award to be completed within 120 calendar days. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Bid # 10-0041DPS. Award a unit price contract for the FY-2011 Street Program to Daisy Construction Co. based on the unit prices for each work item as shown in Attachment A. The scope of work for the program will be altered to reflect the funding that has been secured to complete each location. The Public Services Manager may add or delete from the contract based on available funding throughout the contract period and inform the City Manager of such additions or deletions. All work will be paid for at the unit prices bid for work completed and accepted by the City of Dover. The total work authorized under this contract will not exceed the available funding. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS In conjunction with the City of Dover’s Capital Investments Plan, it is proposed to rehabilitate various pavement sections throughout the City of Dover during Fiscal Year 2011. The following locations were included in the proposed scope of work to be completed under the FY-2011 Street Program: Washington Street Susan Place Delaware Avenue Alley S. Turnberry Lane Mitscher Road Hiawatha Lane Reed Street (State Street to Kings Highway) Bids were opened on Monday, June 7, 2010. Three (3) contractors submitted unit price bids for the proposed work to be performed. Based on the proposed quantities, the estimated contract values are as follows: Daisy Construction Co. New Castle, Delaware $638,232.95 George & Lynch, Inc. Dover, Delaware $721,001.31 David A. Bramble, Inc. Chestertown, MD $732,447.20 The FY-2011 Street Program contract documents allow staff to alter quantities up to 35% without changes to unit prices; therefore, the contract final value may be adjusted to reflect all available funding. Daisy Construction Co. was the city’s contractor for the last Street Program and their quality of work was more than satisfactory. In addition, their billing and certified payroll was submitted in a timely manner and coordinated with the Public Works Inspector.

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council AGENDA ITEM NO.: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Services DATE SUBMITTED: 6/15/2010 PREPARED BY: Scott D. Koenig, P.E., Public Services Manager SUBJECT: Evaluation of Bids – Miscellaneous Concrete Repair Program REFERENCE: Project # ST1101 (Proposed) RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: City Manager, Controller EXHIBITS: N/A EXPENDITURE ESTIMATE: $30,175.50 AMOUNT BUDGETED: $50,000.00 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Streets Division Operating Budget (147-1800- 554.40-31) - $50,000.00 (Concrete Construction & Replacement Program – Project # ST1101 (Page 256 of the 2011 Draft Operating Budget) TIME TIMETABLE: This is a unit price contract starting with the date of award and ending within sixty (60) calendar days after the Notice to Proceed. The estimated completion date is no later than September 30, 2010. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award a unit price contract for the FY-2011 Miscellaneous Concrete Repair Program based on the unit prices for each work item to Melvin Ray’s Masonry in the estimated amount of $30,175.50 based on the tentative scope of work. All work will be paid for at the unit prices bid for work completed and accepted by the City of Dover. Staff intends to increase the value of the contract to $40,000 - $45,000 based on the unit prices received. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS In conjunction with the City of Dover’s Capital Investments Plan, it is proposed to use a contractor to remove and replace approximately 6,148 square feet of miscellaneous concrete work at various tentative locations throughout the City of Dover during Fiscal Year 2011. Staff has visited each of the tentative work locations and has prepared a work plan and bid specification package for these repairs. Bids were opened on June 9, 2010, Bid Number: 10-0042DPS. Ten (10) contractors submitted unit price bids for the work to be performed as follows: Melvin Ray’s Masonry Marydel, Delaware $30,175.50 Aztech Contracting Clayton, Delaware $34,644.00 Byler’s Concrete, LLC Dover, Delaware $39,605.00 Peoples & sons, LLC Chester, PA (includes minority preference) $42,022.43 Ashton Group Ltd New Castle, Delaware $49,614.50 Fermanagh-Abruzzi Concrete New Castle, Delaware $53,208.50 Stripe-A-Lot, Inc. Wilmington, Delaware $53,688.00 Shea Concrete LTD Milford, Delaware $58,379.00 Brian Johnson, Inc. Newark, Delaware $73,203.80 Kent Construction Co. Smyrna, Delaware $108,785.50 If the contractor performs well on the scope of work identified in the bid package, staff intends to expand the scope of work to expend $40,000 - $45,000 on the contracted work.

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-18 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN 2 COUNCIL MET: 3 4 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 9 – Board of Adjustment, be amended by inserting the text 5 indicated in blue, bold, italics and delete the text indicated in red, bold, strike-through, as follows: 6 7 ARTICLE 9. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 8 9 Section 1. Creation, appointment and organization. 10 11 There shall be a board of adjustment pursuant to the provisions of chapter 3 of title 22, 12 Municipalities, of the Delaware Code Annotated (22 Del. C. § 301 et seq.). 13 14 Section 2. Powers and duties. 15 16 The board of adjustment shall have all the powers and duties prescribed by law and by 17 this ordinance, which are more particularly specified as follows, provided that none of the 18 following provisions shall be deemed to limit any power of the said board that is conferred by 19 law: 20 21 2.1 Interpretation. On appeal from an order, requirement, decision or determination 22 made by an administrative official, or a request by any official, board or agency of the 23 city, to decide any of the following questions: 24 25 2.11 Determination of the meaning of any portion of the text of this ordinance 26 or of any condition or requirement specified or made under the provisions of 27 this ordinance. 28 29 2.12 Determination of the exact location of any district boundary shown on the 30 zoning map. 31 32 2.2 Variances. To authorize, upon appeal in specific cases, such variance from the 33 terms of this ordinance, other than variance of any use regulations, except a variance 34 permitting addition to or extension of an existing nonconforming use of a more 35 restrictive nature than the conforming use in the area as will not be contrary to the 36 public interest where, owing to exceptional and extraordinary circumstances, there are 37 practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in the way of carrying out of the strict 38 letter of this ordinance, subject to terms and conditions to be fixed by the board; 39 provided, however, that no such variance shall be granted unless the board finds: 40 41 (a) That there are physical conditions, fully described in the findings of 42 the board, applying to the land or building for which the variance is 43 sought, which conditions are peculiar to such land or building, and have 44 not resulted from any act of the applicant or any predecessor in title; 45 and 46

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-18 PAGE 2 47 (b) That, for reasons fully set forth in the findings of the board, the 48 aforesaid circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application 49 of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of all 50 reasonable use of such land or building and the granting of the variance 51 is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building, and that the 52 variance as granted by the board is the minimum variance that will 53 accomplish this purpose; and 54 55 (c) That the granting of the variance under such conditions as the 56 board may deem necessary or desirable to apply thereto will be in 57 harmony with the general purpose and intent of this ordinance, will not 58 represent a radical departure therefrom, will not be injurious to the 59 neighborhood, will not change the character thereof and will not be 60 otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 61 62 2.21 The needs or desires of a particular owner or tenant or of a particular prospective 63 owner or tenant shall not, either alone or in conjunction with other factors, afford any 64 basis for the granting of a variance. The fact that the improvements already existing 65 at the time of the application are old, obsolete, outmoded or in disrepair, or the fact 66 that the property is then unimproved, shall not be deemed to make the plight of the 67 property unique or to contribute thereto. 68 69 2.22 Where the board finds the zoning classification of a particular property to be 70 conducive to the deprivation of all reasonable use of the land or building by the owner 71 thereof, and where the board deems the same condition to apply generally to other land 72 or buildings in the same neighborhood or zone, the said board may call this condition 73 to the attention of the planning commission for recommending amendment to the 74 zoning ordinance. 75 76 2.23 In all cases where the board of adjustment grants a variance from the strict 77 application of the requirements of this ordinance, it shall be the duty of such board to 78 attach conditions and safeguards as may be required in order that the result of its 79 action may be as nearly as possible in accordance with the intent and purposes of this 80 ordinance. 81 82 2.24 Whenever the board of adjustment denies an application for variance, such 83 application for variance, or an application on the same property which is substantially 84 similar, shall not be accepted for reconsideration by the board of adjustment sooner 85 than one year from the date of denial. 86 87 The board of adjustment shall have the powers and duties as specified in Delaware Code 88 Annotated (22 Del. C. § 301 et seq.) and as articulated below: 89 90 2.1 Variance – The board shall have the authority to authorize variances from provisions 91 of the zoning ordinance that are not contrary to public interest where the board 92 determines that a literal interpretation of the zoning ordinance would result in undue 93 hardship or exceptional practical difficulties to the applicant. In granting variances, the 94 board shall determine that the spirit of the zoning ordinance is observed and substantial 95 justice done.

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-18 PAGE 3 96 2.11 Area Variance. A variance shall be considered an area variance if it relates to bulk 97 standards, signage regulations, and other provisions of the zoning ordinance that address 98 lot layout, buffers, and dimensions. In considering a request for an area variance, the 99 board shall evaluate the following criteria and document them in their findings of fact: 100 101 (a) the nature of the zone in which the property lies; 102 103 (b) the character of the immediate vicinity and the contained uses therein; 104 105 (c) whether, if the restriction upon the applicant’s property were removed, such 106 removal would seriously affect neighboring properties and uses; and 107 108 (d) whether, if the restriction is not removed, the restriction would create 109 unnecessary hardship or exceptional practical difficulty for the owner in his 110 efforts to make normal improvements in the character of that use of the property 111 that is a permitted use under the provisions of the zoning ordinance. 112 113 2.12 Use Variance. A variance shall be considered a use variance if it would permit a use 114 of the subject property that would otherwise not be permitted on the subject property. In 115 considering a request for a use variance, the board shall determine that the following 116 criteria exist and document them in their findings of fact: 117 118 (a) That there are physical conditions applying to the land or building for which 119 the variance is sought, which conditions are peculiar to such land or building, and 120 have not resulted from any act of the applicant or any predecessor in title; and 121 122 (b) That the aforesaid circumstances or conditions are such that the strict 123 application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of all 124 reasonable use of such land or building and the granting of the variance is 125 necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building, and that the variance as 126 granted by the board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; 127 and 128 129 (c) That the granting of the variance under such conditions as the board may 130 deem necessary or desirable to apply thereto will be in harmony with the general 131 purpose and intent of this ordinance, will not represent a radical departure 132 therefrom, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, will not change the character 133 thereof and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 134 135 2.2 Appeal of administrative order, requirement, decision, or determination – The board shall 136 have the authority to hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is any order, requirement, 137 decision or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement of the zoning 138 ordinance. Appeals to the board may be made by any person aggrieved or by any officer, 139 department, board or bureau of the municipality affected by any decision of an administrative 140 officer. 141 142

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-18 PAGE 4 143 Section 3. Procedure. 144 145 The powers and duties of the board of adjustment shall be exercised in accordance with the 146 following procedure: 147 148 3.1 The board of adjustment shall not decide upon any appeal for interpretation or 149 variance without first holding a public hearing, notice of which hearing and of the substance 150 of the appeal or application shall be given by publication in the official newspaper of the city 151 at least ten days before the date of such hearing. In addition to such published notice, the 152 board of adjustment shall cause notice to be given of the substance of every appeal for a 153 variance, together with notice of the hearing thereon, by causing notices thereof to be mailed 154 by postal card or other means at least ten days before the date of said hearing to the owners 155 of all property abutting that held by the applicant in the immediate area (whether or not 156 involved in such appeal) and all other owners within 200 feet, or such additional distance as 157 the board of adjustment may deem advisable, from the exterior boundaries of the land 158 involved in such appeal, as the names of said owners appear on the last completed 159 assessment roll of the city. Any or all of the notices required by this [sub]section shall be 160 issued by the office of the city clerk city planner on order of the board of adjustment or 161 upon order of the chairperson of said board if the appeal is received when the board is not 162 in session and the chairperson deems it necessary or desirable to expedite the public hearing 163 on such appeal. Provided that due notice shall have been published as above provided and 164 that there shall have been substantial compliance with the remaining provisions of the 165 paragraph [subsection], the failure to give notice in exact conformance herewith shall not 166 be deemed to invalidate action taken by the board of adjustment in connection with the 167 granting of any appeal or variance. 168 169 3.2 If the land involved in an appeal or application lies within 500 feet of the boundary of 170 any other incorporated municipality, the city clerk city planner shall also transmit to the 171 municipal clerk of such other municipality a copy of the official notice of the public hearing 172 thereon not later than the day after such notice appears in the official newspaper of the city. 173 174 3.3 At least ten days before the date of any public hearing, the secretary of the board 175 of adjustment shall transmit to the secretary of the planning commission a copy of any 176 appeal or application, together with a copy of the notice of such hearing. The planning 177 commission may submit to the board of adjustment an advisory opinion on said appeal 178 or application at any time prior to the rendering of a decision.3.4 179 180 3.4 3.3 Unless work is commenced and diligently prosecuted within one year of the date of 181 the granting of a variance, such variance shall become null and void. 182 183 3.5 3.4All appeals and variance applications and appeals made to the board of adjustment 184 shall be in writing, on forms prescribed by the board and approved by the planning 185 commission. All variance requests and appeals from an order, requirement, decision or 186 determination made by an administrative official, board or agency of the city for 187 residential uses shall be accompanied by a fee as provided for in Appendix F--Fees and 188 Fines. All variance requests for nonresidential uses shall be accompanied by a fee as 189 provided for in Appendix F--Fees and Fines. All appeals from an order, requirement, 190 decision or determination made by an administrative official, board or agency of the 191 city shall be accompanied by a fee as provided for in Appendix F--Fees and Fines. The

PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-18 PAGE 5 192 board of adjustment may, in its discretion, return to the applicant part or all of the fee paid 193 by him in the event that his appeal under section 2.2 Appeal of administrative order, 194 requirement, decision, or determination 2.1 (interpretation) hereof is partially or wholly 195 successful. The fees filed in connection with applications under section 2.1 Variance 2.2 196 (variances) shall not be returnable, regardless of disposition of the case by the board. 197 198 3.6 3.5 Each appeal or variance application or appeal shall fully set forth the circumstances 199 of the case. Every appeal or variance application or appeal shall refer to the specific 200 provision of the ordinance involved, and shall exactly set forth, as the case may be, the 201 interpretation that is claimed, the details of the variance that is applied for and the grounds 202 on which it is claimed that the same should be granted. 203 204 3.7 3.6 Every decision of the board of adjustment shall be recorded in accordance with 205 standard forms adopted by the board, and shall fully set forth the circumstances of the case 206 and shall contain a full record of the findings on which the decision is based. Every decision 207 of the board shall be by resolution and each such resolution shall be filed by case number, 208 together with all documents pertaining thereto. The board of adjustment shall notify the 209 city planner, each member of the city council, and the chairperson of the planning 210 commission in Dover, and the municipal clerk of any affected municipality given notice 211 of hearings as set forth in [sub]section 3.2 of its decision in each case. 212 213 3.8 3.7 All the provisions of this ordinance relating to the board of adjustment shall be 214 strictly construed. The board, as a body of limited jurisdiction, shall act in full conformity 215 with all provisions of law and of this ordinance and in strict compliance with all limitations 216 contained therein; provided, however, that if the procedural requirements set forth in this 217 ordinance have been substantially observed, no applicant or appellant shall be deprived of 218 the right of application or appeal. 219 220 3.8 Whenever the board of adjustment denies an application for variance, such application 221 for variance, or an application on the same property which is substantially similar, shall 222 not be accepted for reconsideration by the board of adjustment sooner than one year from 223 the date of denial. 224 225 226 ADOPTED: * 227 228 229 SYNOPSIS 230 The proposed ordinance brings the City’s code provisions governing Board of 231 Adjustment into conformance with State statutes and case law. 232 233 234 Actions History: 235 June 14, 2010 - Introduced in Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee

PETITION TO AMEND ZONING MAP First Reading before the Dover City Council June 28, 2010 Proposed Zoning Change: Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map to rezone certain parcels throughout the City to ROS (Recreational and Open Space Zone) in conformance with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Summary of Amendment: Staff has initiated the rezoning of 150 parcels of land City-wide to the newly created ROS (Recreational and Open Space) Zone in accordance with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The properties proposed for rezoning consist of City parks, State-owned open space, restricted open space owned by homeowners associations (including active recreation areas, passive open space, and stormwater management areas), and Maple Dale Country Club. City Council adopted the Ordinance #2010-12, creating the ROS zone on June 14, 2010. The Planning Office sent letters to all affected property owners on June 7, 2010, informing them of the proposal and offering them the opportunity to meet with Planning Staff to answer questions and concerns they may have. The Planning Staff have met with a number of property owners and have answered any questions and concerns. In determining which parcels to bring forward as a part of the rezoning proposal, staff performed a detailed review of the areas shown as Open Space on the Land Development Plan (Map 12-1 as amended dated November 23, 2009) of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan to ensure that properties brought forward for rezoning are actual open space. Several parcels were not included, as staff determined that there was a mapping error. Staff will bring these forward for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment in accordance with timeframes set forth in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Other properties shown as Open Space are not proposed for rezoning at this time as the subdivision is pending start of construction, the subdivision is currently under development, or the area is protected as open space by other provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Attachments: Draft Ordinance Map Exhibits Property Listing of Lands Proposed for Rezoning Ordinance Number: 2010-21 File Number: MI-10-11

Forrest Fores Exhibit A June t Gibbs Independenc e o ck Bertrand ROS LiRezoning Wo o d st ncoln wn Fa Cherry Vine 92 Jawd Paul 16 Farmview n Davis ng to i B e nn r Ir ma ese ghte Wo odmill 33 32 s Slau Clare 15 Re ye Ha S im o n Tr 24 nce a Saulsb Minim af 13 al ga 12 14 17 r 19 Ban ury st er W or c h e 18 20 Com m erce ni ng rne st 11 s 21 se o u i rs in Be ise r Fai s llh sta iffl 2 ro r 22 Pa To Broad 25 rth C M g No ee arrin 1 ad Ch 8 23 Enterpr is 9 W 10 Sh e es es m ha yss e tov 7 k T Wem ld ra rth e r tri 3 4 e es na No ID # Property Address Llyo Current Zoning Proposed Zoning ef m Ja y Ka do 5 lett ville 1 NORTHDOWN DR Moo RM-1 re d ROS J fre H az Ann RM-1 Ruth w en 6 2 FAIRNEST CT ROS n u ill 3 NORTHDOWN DR RM-1 ROS Q Gagen 26 4 NORTHDOWN DR RM-1 ROS o 5 WESTOVER DR RM-1 ROS nn r Ca 6 NORTHDOWN DR RM-1 ROS Leste nM ale 27 7 TRAFALGAR DR 8 WESTOVER DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ RM-1 ROS nd ill W y o m i ng o s x rby 9 THAMES DR RM-1 ROS Sa k De i tti n oo 10 CHARRING CROSS DR RM-1 ROS Br br tr ill hire Elec 11 WESTOVER DR RM-1 ROS G e al Mill 12 WORCHESTER DR RM-1 ROS gh ic am uv 13 WESTOVER DR RM-1 ROS Be chak 14 WORCHESTER DR RM-1 ROS Kons 15 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS 16 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS Wyom ing 17 CHARRING CROSS DR RM-1 ROS 28 18 CHARRING CROSS DR RM-1 ROS 19 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS les Ye 20 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1 ROS Cha Ü r arsle y 21 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 22 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ n rto 23 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZHolly BuROS, SWPOZ 29 24 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ w Ne Legend 25 TRAFALGAR DR RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ S Oak te Dover Parcels Riverside 26 HAZLETTVILLE RD RM-1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ war t Dover Boundary ee 27 ELECTRIC AVE IO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ ROS, 125 Crickle Creek Crk d 28 10 ELECTRIC AVE IO, SWPOZ ad SWPOZ B en Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS Sh 29 WYOMING MILL RD R-10 w ROS Blue Beach Cana o Map Created: 30 CANAL ST R-10 ROS Department of Planning and Inspections Baker Turn 30 le 31 CRICKLE CREEK LN R-10 ROS l rs Date Map Created: 6-2-10 Fid d nt e Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 32 S FARMVIEW DR RG-2 ROS Wi File Path: Inspect/Comp Plan 2009/MI-10-11 33 S FARMVIEW DR RG-2 ROS rbe o od 0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600 Feet 31 92 SAULSBURY RD 127 DogwROS, RG-1, COZ-1 COZ-1 rry

66 Exhibit B e 49 ROS Rezoning ov tnu t Gr 48 Tu rnberry Baltusrol es Ch r Ta yl 47 o 45 Sc iot Legend o Ken ton 46 67 e Dover Parcels lle g Dover Boundary Arbo Wi Co ng Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS ed r Fo h ot As Shi nn ec oc ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning k 34 KENTON68 Ha r m o ny t RD RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 ee 35 N CAROLINE PL RG-3 r ROS dom Sw ing Wa l ke Free rn Ha Klei Bu ze 36 FORREST AVE RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 gu n m ltin e Tre e 37 DOVER-HARTLY RD RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 38 FORREST AVE RG-2, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1Liberty 44 ustie 39 HEATHERFIELD WAY R-8 and RG-2 ROS 43 Ca rn 40 PEBBLE VALLEY DR R-8 ROS o 41 HEATHERFIELD WAY R-8 ROS 42 CHELSEA l l WAY R-10 ROS Ha Independ enc e 43 Fo SWEETGUM DR x R-8 ROS r te 44 ARBOR DR R-8 pligh Lam ROS 89 45 ARBOR DR R-8 E ROS 88 n 46 S TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROSsse Sto ow 47 S TURNBERRY DR HarrRM-1 90 ROS xH ey a ll w ick 48 N TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROS llo ll Ta 49 39 MAPLE DALE RD RCIvy Ha ROS ble 91R-10 ne C ol d t Pe b 66 OAKMONT DR ROS F lin a l s to od Te Field ld wo 67 28 CARNOUSTIE RD R-10 ROS Green ar O g Bri Sprin ley brook Val lin Stone Caro in e Periw kle Blade Som 42 40 erse 35 t 41 38 C he lsea 39 Ü Map Created: Fa l m th ou Matthew Ke vi n 37 Greenway Hampto n Greentree Par Haven Department of Planning and Inspections Cranberry Run 36 Heatherfield Date Map Created: 6-2-10 Fairw Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 ide 34 h Cre File Path: Inspect/Comp Ya Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 La rm outh ou rts M a rs ay 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 C kes Forrest June Feet ek

k Exhibit C e re llc 57 h Scarboroug 58 ROS Rezoning Mi s ey st nn ri m ll G De i Mc Ke ty e r si ve ni 56 U on re State vin gt no ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 52 ap Co 55 M Se 45 ARBOR DR R-8 ROS w ar e Ni 59 ski 53 54 le 46 S TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROS 60 Ro en ck Gl bl De y ic 47 S TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROS la k 61 te ine 51 dy 48 N TURNBERRY DR RM-1 ROS ga Mi w an No rth ch r ae B 49 39 MAPLE DALE RD RC ROS l Ke n s in 50 236 KENTON RD RM-1, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 g to Hem ste n 51 5 W DENNEYS RD RM-1 ROS d 52 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 ROS 93 ow Me ad 53 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 ROS M ay is Fair w 54 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 M ROS olh Ja 50 o illip is g 55 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 ROS ry ho Gre Ph so e Vera n rs 56 MAPLE GLEN DR R-8 ROS h ma W hi t e e 57 126 MILLCREEK DR RM-1 ROS ton 58 8 GRINDINGCoWHEEL DR RM-1 ROS s lle Co em 59 MCKEE RD R-8, COZ-1 94 ROS, COZ-1 ge ell G in nw P Moonstone p M 60 1510 MCKEE RD ark R-8 ROS To Ar on az er al 61 MCKEE RD R-8, mCOZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 im t in es k Medi 62 l 62 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS y pa W 95 in arnoc lle 63 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS st k Va er n ah O ne 64 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS Po r t rush Portm Pi Me ti e 65 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS e rio olle n Ta nza n g A ug 63 66 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS y C e a ltra usta e ss ar in ern anter am 67 28 CARNOUSTIE RD R-10 ROS o Pr Sh Inv Tam O u Tro n B n Pi q es A wich tw O ea Gl e Blackh ak Re M Sa n d nea i ck dO cK gl H Legend ee Sa es 64 ak tCree le oy y in th Whea k tA la 49 For 70 Ma t Dover Parcels ke es on M Al ale o nt Qu lor Tr e ed ui Oakm Dover Boundary ail y Lo rfi es zo e pl nn Ta H st eld 71 to beorezoned to wROS 69Properties proposed Me 65 72 ad n V Bro ow llow Sai Ga irg Be nt An dre rde i A nn ni a llr od 73 ws ive Ironwo n Map Created: 66 75 Ü 74 Department of Planning and Inspections C arnoust l ro Date Map Created: 6-2-10 ge ie Villa us ov e 48 Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 Ke 76 a lt 45 nt Gr Turnberry File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning Ke ritage2009/MI-10-11 ut 47 B n nt on e r t Arb 1,770 Walke2,360 Ch es 46 67 o to 0 295 590 1,180 77 bury H 78 Sauls Feet or Sc i

Re n O ak Exhibit D Pi ld f ie 64 Me rio n d Oa k tC es ree ROS Rezoning k o Sch Mu on ir Fo Wils r ge ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 70 For Alon 64 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS olho 65 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS nt lor use ld zo o Oakm y 66 OAKMONT DR R-10 ROS O Qu oo ail ee Ta 67 28 CARNOUSTIE RD R-10 W ROS o Ho McK dc r ad llo 68 1357 WALKER RD RG-3 ROS 69 Me 71 69 OLD FORGE DR R-10 es t ROS en 72 wn w 65 70 OLD FORGE DR RG-3 Bu ROS ard Bro rn Ann t Tu wG 71 V OLD FORGE DR ir R-8 ttn r ROS 51 gi c es od er 72 VILLAGE ni DR RG-3 ROS rno ie Hi tch 73 a POST DR HITCHING RG-3 Wo ROS 96 Be od u st Ironwo 73 74 HITCHING POST DR RG-3 ROS e llr lle ing ive g 75 45 QUAIL HOLLOW DR R-8 ROS 66 74 75 Ca Co Po 76 HITCHING POST DR RG-3 ROS e 77 HERITAGE DR RG-3 ROS l Villag sro st ltu Ke 78 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8 ROS 76 nt Cobbler Ba 79 41 HOMBERG CIR R-8 ROS 80 HOMBERG CIR R-8 ROS ge ita 81 109 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8, COZ-1 ROS. COZ-1 Her 82 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 77 o to 83 209 MONT BLANC BLVD R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 67 S ci er 84 SAULSBURY RD R-8, COZ-1 ROS, COZ-1 Walk 85 744 BICENTENNIAL BLVD R-8 ROS 78 86 GEORGE WASHINGTON DR RM-1 ROS 87 GEORGE WASHINGTON DR RG-2 ROS Arlb 88 INDEPENDENCE BLVD c o t LN at RG-3 ROS rg Wha e 89 43 LAMPLIGHTER RG-3 ROS Ha r m o ny 68 79 90 43 LAMPLIGHTER LN RG-3 ROS F r eed 91 GREENS OF DOVER RG-3 ROS om Bice M on in nt e n 80 Kle t Bla io Patr Liber ty nial nc 81 n t ra tio De cla rn erho Matt s Saul all 83 xH bury Fo L am t pligh er Mee 82 84 90 89 88 Legend E C obb a hous Dover Parcels x leston E ige r Clar ti n g sse al e nt Dover Boundary w n H arro n e H nto all Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS Ke e In d on ny ti all Colo Ivy H 85 Ü ep 91 Cold C t en d a tone in Te Fields Fl c 86 en l g ld Sprin O e ro Pa u l Reve r e Stoneb Map Created: e Ge o r g ad h te Department of Planning and Inspections Green B l Was Pew Date Map Created: 6-2-10 87 38 Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 ok ingt 35 e r File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 Ca r o l in e drow Woo on ht Greenway 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 Dwig Feet

Exhibit E 93 ROS Rezoning si c Le e ip a Mi g ilm sho ol le ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning M W l C d is h oe it a 93 425 COLLEGE RD IO ROS R ra on Ja 94 COLLEGE RD R-20 ROS ym Ve so Du Ra n 95 WOODCREST DR R-8 ROS po 96 BUTTNER PL RG-3 ROS nt 97 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS Co 98 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS nw ell 99 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS 100 SILVER LAKE BLVD RG-3 ROS Hiawatha 94 101 WALKER RD R-20 ROS 102 OVERLOOK PL RG-3 ROS 103 N GOVERNORS AVE R-8 ROS Terry 97 104 N STATE ST R-8 ROS po re 95 99 Le 98 nu 100 W Ve in st a tm Vi e es k er st Overloo 102 L a ke State o Sch er Sil v olho on use Wils od Wo y nn on 101 Al ic k L t cres Patr r zo Legend ylo Ta 103 ry mete Qu Dover Parcels oria l Ce ail Lake sid e Me m H Boundary Dover Kee Mc Properties proposed to be wn rezoned to ROS Ann 104 oll o Bu tT rs Bro urn Vi ttn ern er 72 Walk o w r rg dc es er in 96 Map Created: oo ia Lake W Go Brad v Department lla of Planning and Inspections 73 view Vi Dateg Map Created: 6-2-10 s Fair e R os d Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 Caro woo ford Ü t Wes 75 File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 Pear 74 150 300 l 0 600 900 1,200 m bi a van i a 77 C ol u n syl Feet P en

k 145 143 Oa Exhibit F 141 n m Cly er Nixo 139 bia Lake k olum Oa C 107 te 140 hi ROS Rezoning Aco view d ison woo Fair W Caro Mad 108 Penn Sp r illis rn ney h S R od W tsc Girl s y lv ua n am Mi Willi ngt o l en 105 Edgehill hi a n ia ke n Lind Was La ce lse 109 Up Ha Av e er c ou Brad view ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 137 106 ee lan Gr y t 105 422 N NEW ST IO ROS d el le 110 is Mill Le w ford Haz p Ma nh Pear a d 106 414 N NEW ST IO ROS ill Clar rylan Ma th 107 RODNEY RD R-8 ROS Smi Ed g n on 108 WASHINGTON ST R-8 ROS Pen em en Mary 109 g G ard ST JONES RIVER R-20 ROS il Ma rt rin Sp 110 ST JONES RIVER R-20 ROS o wta t Ame sylv a ware 111 A ha m ania Dela 111 230 KINGS HWY R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ B a ll rican Sw lu e il Cec s 112 PARK DR R-10 ROS a King co ell ldw t 113 E LOOCKERMAN ST R-10 ROS Ca on Fult 114 COURT ST IO, H ROS Pe n n an 115 e410 LEGISLATIVE AVE IO, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H Jo Rid m 112 r hn gel er Park ck u nnBr Kirk Gov 116 THE GREEN Lo o RGO, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H H sion Stat e Divi rd y n d ya 117 THE GREEN ow RGO, H Ba ROS, H Nob Hill t woo Ba bb Wes en nors t on Que 118 EAST AVE un IO, n e lHl ROS Wes B New Lady Bu g Reed Libe 119 S DUPONT HWY RG-2 ROS reet 113 JH Bro 120 S NEW ST R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ Moriarity e St wn rty Stat 121 S QUEEN ST Dupont R-8 and CPO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ Z For est Minor Th e PL ited M er Un Cou Lincoln York Ra D uk e of 114 Cou rt n try Margaret Little Creek Davis 115 Cherry ilro Fed Paul Vine Pen n 116 ad eral ia m Will hter h 117 Ma rtin Slau g Clare Nort lle r nce 118 Kent Co Mi Le a Minim vy k Ban wg il tg Legi en Sho Co Kerb Sussex Cast H l er le ue ur Ban Wat slati v Bl t un in E lm New ni ng lins y Col Ba e Ri v Legend er th Dover Parcels Sou ll S cu Dover Boundary 119 ol Scho en tary Elem Ho l y Cross Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS cS bli Moo re Pu Map Created: Ann Hope Department of Planning and Inspections kin ur i on Ü ty arac La afe Date Map Created: 6-2-10 Sack ta t 121 Llyo 120 Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 po r el Bradford d ns 2009/MI-10-11 File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning Tra stv We iew to r Dover 0 275 550 1,100 1,650 2,200 n Bu Sunset Monroe w Feet Ne

bury ys s Sauls Wem ID # Property Address 119 Current Zoning Proposed Zoning t Llyo Wes 122 WESTVIEW TER R-10 ROS Que Moo re Exhibit G en New 123 WOODSEDGE RD R-10 ROS d Hope Ruth A nn 124 in S GOVERNORS AVE APT IRRIG R-10 k1052 ROS ty c afe ROS 120 Rezoning a ra Sack cS 121 125 NEW BURTON RD R-10 ROS bli 126 BLUE BEACH DR R-8 ROS Pu Dover 127 BLUE BEACH DR R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ Laurel 128 TURNER DR R-8 ROS d oo 129 1547 S DUPONT HWY CPO ROS w Gooden er 130 S Pi ne HWY DUPONT CPO ROS Sh 131 16 S STATE ST CPO ROS Waples 132 45 S DUPONT HWY R-20 ROS Monroe Westview Bradford hak tus 133 45LSoDUPONT HWY R-20 ROS Sunset Park Governors State Eve K 134 ST JONES RIVER IO ROS Janeka rgre Woodfor d ons ris en Shank M or c nt Orchard po Wyoming 134 Du Woo d Roosevelt n Ch ar s edge rto Ye les Jefferson ar River Chase 123 122 Bu sle y Wood burn New Holly Westwood Mal lard Oak St Crescent ew tor Sta c te nne Stre ar 124 o et t nC Lynnha ven Ru 125 on 133 Sh e nch Pu o adw Blue Beach 132 Ba ke r Turn Fid De dle at nt e s Wi rs Dogwoo d 127 rbe 126Alder rry Kesselring Legend 131 128 d Dover Parcels Mockingbir 130 nic k Dover Boundary R ud Old Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS Mimosa Turner 129 Post Haman Map Created: Mayberry er Department of Planning and Inspections Locust Point op Ü Co Date Map Created: 6-2-10 We bb s Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 Estat File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 0 262.5 525 1,050 1,575 2,100 e Feet

Exhibit H m ev Ni Stens on ley r Suva na ad Do it z on ROS Rezoning Br ve s rri x t on k r Ha Oa Bra te rd hi ck fo W ea Ro 145 144 Aco k c oc Fr rn Han r ns pki Ho 143 Tho 141 Sta 142 m er rnto n y Cly Hw illis Sp W Nixo te 140 139 ru o Mah n 1 an h ce Mi tsc as ga n Aca hol oo k Nic dybr Lex Sha 138 Girl er y cia Lind ingt ut Sc o Teak on 137 en Ha lse y 136 Fox Up on lan isi Div Little Creek d Gree nhill Ma rt a ll o t a i l a w an Ah a m B m er S lu e w ck co a o o ell L ldw t Prospect hill ge Ca Ed on Hill Corn er Kent ID # Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning wa n 135 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ N ob Se John R ou n tre 136 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ Pi l e 137 SHADYBROOK DR R-8 ROS nn d ot Hu Babb Legend n do w 138 N LITTLE CREEK RD R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ ow Bu ll a Br nn e Sh er 139 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ Dover Parcels op Lady Bug Co Cameo 140 NIXON LN R-20 ROS Dover Boundary Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS Regen t 141 NIXON LN R-20 ROS Dupont 142 NIXON LN R-20 ROS JH Brown Mo riarit Map Created: Mer Ingram M onarch Department of Planning and Inspections 143 NIXON LN R-20 ROS Signal B Date Map Created: 6-2-10 ay Co u 144 ACORN LN R-20 ROS Barrister Ü Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 ntry y Court Margaret Holme 135 File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 s 145 1210 WHITE OAK RD R-20 ROS Little Cree k M a rt i 0 195 390 780 1,170 1,560 Feet n

Exhibit I Jonathan se K urt ROS Rezoning to n mr o Mic Pri S ut lch helle We Kar en ID # Property Address Far Current Zoning Proposed Zoning rell Finis h Line 150 146 TOWNSEND BLVD A ud McG Ve r R-8 inn is ROS nell n Per si m m on 147 TOWNSEND BLVD rey r R-8 ROS ave o ly C ar 148 TOWNSEND BLVD We R-8 ROS n re Ol d ree Moo 149 TOWNSEND BLVD R-8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ an Mau Lei psi c Sus 150 110 PERSIMMON CIR MHP ROS Pl d az Gor Bet a h on ip s ic Le St at e Hw y 1 149 Legend 148 n Dover Parcels Du Hiawatha po Baco Nimitz Dover Boundary er nt feri Properties proposed to be rezoned to ROS State c ill M hoo 147 Sc Jef e or nd ne r Map Created: Bu ep Inspections 146 Department of PlanningLand ck d D ra pe To in wn r so W Date Map Created: 6-2-10 n se nu Ü Date Map Printed: 6-2-10 Ve gs a ck st File Path: Inspect/Comp Rezoning 2009/MI-10-11 Vi k g l A Bo e Bu 0 195 390 Ov e 780r lo o 1,170 1,560 rv e Marin nc h or 102 Feet Ca er

MI‐10‐11 List of Properties proposed to be Rezoned to ROS ID # Parcel ID Property Address Owner Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 1 ED05‐076.13‐04‐87.00 NORTHDOWN DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 2 ED05‐076.13‐04‐64.00 FAIRNEST CT VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 3 ED05‐076.13‐04‐65.00 NORTHDOWN DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 4 ED05‐076.13‐05‐48.00 NORTHDOWN DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 5 ED05‐076.13‐02‐60.00 WESTOVER DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 6 ED05‐076.13‐02‐61.00 NORTHDOWN DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 7 ED05‐076.13‐01‐58.00 TRAFALGAR DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 8 ED05‐076.13‐01‐57.00 WESTOVER DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 9 ED05‐076.13‐02‐59.00 THAMES DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 10 ED05‐076.13‐03‐33.00 CHARRING CROSS DR WESTOVER LLC RM‐1 ROS 11 ED05‐076.13‐04‐66.00 WESTOVER DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 12 ED05‐076.09‐02‐86.00 WORCHESTER DR ROBINO‐SEA CHASE LLC RM‐1 ROS 13 ED05‐076.09‐02‐89.00 WESTOVER DR ROBINO‐SEA CHASE LLC RM‐1 ROS 14 ED05‐076.09‐02‐88.00 WORCHESTER DR ROBINO‐SEA CHASE LLC RM‐1 ROS 15 ED05‐076.09‐02‐01.00 TRAFALGAR DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 16 ED05‐076.10‐02‐87.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM‐1 ROS 17 ED05‐076.13‐03‐18.00 CHARRING CROSS DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 18 ED05‐076.13‐03‐18.00 CHARRING CROSS DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1 ROS 19 ED05 076. ‐076.10‐02‐89.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM‐1 ROS 20 ED05‐076.10‐02‐89.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM‐1 ROS 21 ED05‐076.10‐02‐89.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM‐1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 22 ED05‐076.13‐02‐58.00 TRAFALGAR DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 23 ED05‐076.13‐02‐57.00 TRAFALGAR DR VILLAGE OF WESTOVER HOMEOWNERS RM‐1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 24 ED05‐076.10‐02‐87.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM‐1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 25 ED05‐076.10‐02‐87.00 TRAFALGAR DR WESTOVER LLC RM‐1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 26 ED05‐076.00‐02‐04.02 HAZLETTVILLE RD CITY OF DOVER RM‐1, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 27 ED05‐076.00‐01‐06.01 ELECTRIC AVE CITY OF DOVER‐ Schutte Park IO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 28 ED05‐076.00‐01‐06.00 10 ELECTRIC AVE CITY OF DOVER‐ Schutte Park IO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 29 ED05‐085.06‐01‐71.00 WYOMING MILL RD HIDDEN CREEK HOMEOWNERS R‐10 ROS 30 ED05‐085.06‐01‐70.00 CANAL ST HIDDEN CREEK HOMEOWNERS R‐10 ROS 31 ED05‐085.06‐01‐73.00 CRICKLE CREEK LN HIDDEN CREEK HOMEOWNERS R‐10 ROS 32 ED05‐076.10‐01‐46.00 S FARMVIEW DR CITY OF DOVER RG‐2 ROS 33 ED05‐076.10‐01‐46.00 S FARMVIEW DR CITY OF DOVER RG‐2 ROS 34 ED05‐076.06‐06‐61.00 KENTON RD CITY OF DOVER RG‐2, COZ‐1 ROS, COZ‐1 35 ED05‐076.06‐08‐61.01 N CAROLINE PL CITY OF DOVER RG‐3 ROS 36 ED05‐076.05‐05‐37.00 FORREST AVE G&I VI DOVER COUNTRY CLUB LLC RG‐2, COZ‐1 ROS, COZ‐1 1 June 14, 2010

MI‐10‐11 List of Properties proposed to be Rezoned to ROS ID # Parcel ID Property Address Owner Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 37 ED05‐076.05‐04‐02.00 DOVER‐HARTLY RD CHIOS INVESTMENTS LLC RG‐2, COZ‐1 ROS, COZ‐1 38 ED05‐076.05‐01‐11.01 FORREST AVE CITY OF DOVER‐ Mallard Pond RG‐2, COZ‐1 ROS, COZ‐1 39 ED05‐076.05‐06‐16.00 HEATHERFIELD WAY FIRST FLAG, INC R‐8 and RG‐2 ROS 40 ED05‐076.05‐07‐10.00 PEBBLE VALLEY DR CITY OF DOVER R‐8 ROS 41 ED05‐076.05‐06‐31.00 HEATHERFIELD WAY FIRST FLAG, INC R‐8 ROS 42 ED05‐076.05‐08‐28.00 CHELSEA WAY CRANBERRY RUN MAINTENANCE CORP R‐10 ROS 43 ED05‐067.17‐04‐68.00 SWEETGUM DR CITY OF DOVER‐ Westfield R‐8 ROS 44 ED05‐067.17‐04‐69.00 ARBOR DR WESTFIELD MAINTENANCE CORP R‐8 ROS 45 ED05‐067.17‐04‐67.00 ARBOR DR WESTFIELD MAINTENANCE CORP R‐8 ROS 46 ED05‐067.17‐01‐39.00 S TURNBERRY DR TURNBERRY MAINTENANCE ASSOC RM‐1 ROS 47 ED05‐067.17‐01‐38.00 S TURNBERRY DR TURNBERRY MAINTENANCE ASSOC RM‐1 ROS 48 ED05‐067.17‐01‐01.00 N TURNBERRY DR TURNBERRY MAINTENANCE ASSOC RM‐1 ROS 49 ED05‐067.00‐04‐01.00 39 MAPLE DALE RD MAPLE DALE COUNTRY CLUB INC RC ROS 50 ED05‐066.00‐01‐07.00 236 KENTON RD STATE OF DELAWARE RM‐1, COZ‐1 ROS, COZ‐1 51 ED05‐066.00‐01‐07.03 5 W DENNEYS RD STATE OF DELAWARE RM‐1 ROS 52 ED05‐056.20‐01‐47.00 MAPLE GLEN DR MAPLE GLEN HOMEOWNERS R‐8 ROS 53 ED05‐056.20‐01‐46.00 MAPLE GLEN DR MAPLE GLEN HOMEOWNERS R‐8 ROS 54 ED05‐056.20‐01‐50.00 MAPLE GLEN DR MAPLE GLEN HOMEOWNERS R‐8 ROS 55 ED05 056. ‐056.20‐01‐49.00 MAPLE GLEN DR MAPLE GLEN HOMEOWNERS R‐8 ROS 56 ED05‐056.20‐01‐48.00 MAPLE GLEN DR MAPLE GLEN HOMEOWNERS R‐8 ROS 57 ED05‐057.17‐01‐70.01 126 MILLCREEK DR CITY OF DOVER‐ Mill Creek RM‐1 ROS 58 ED05‐057.17‐02‐35.01 8 GRINDING WHEEL DR STATE OF DELAWARE RM‐1 ROS 59 ED05‐067.05‐02‐19.00 MCKEE RD MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC R‐8, COZ‐1 ROS, COZ‐1 60 ED05‐067.05‐02‐19.01 1510 MCKEE RD FOX MEADOWS JOINT VENTURE R‐8 ROS 61 ED05‐067.05‐02‐19.00 MCKEE RD MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC R‐8, COZ‐1 ROS, COZ‐1 62 ED05‐067.13‐01‐82.00 OAKMONT DR CITY OF DOVER R‐10 ROS 63 ED05‐067.13‐01‐82.00 OAKMONT DR CITY OF DOVER R‐10 ROS 64 ED05‐067.13‐01‐82.00 OAKMONT DR CITY OF DOVER R‐10 ROS 65 ED05‐067.13‐01‐82.00 OAKMONT DR CITY OF DOVER R‐10 ROS 66 ED05‐067.13‐02‐34.00 OAKMONT DR CITY OF DOVER R‐10 ROS 67 ED05‐067.17‐01‐81.00 28 CARNOUSTIE RD FOX HALL PLANTATION CO R‐10 ROS 68 ED05‐067.18‐01‐66.00 1357 WALKER RD WALKER WOODS PARTNERS LP RG‐3 ROS 69 ED05‐067.14‐03‐01.00 OLD FORGE DR CITY OF DOVER‐ Hamlet R‐10 ROS 70 ED05‐067.14‐02‐61.00 OLD FORGE DR CITY OF DOVER‐ Hamlet RG‐3 ROS 71 ED05‐067.14‐03‐79.00 OLD FORGE DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC R‐8 ROS 72 ED05‐067.15‐01‐28.00 51 VILLAGE DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC RG‐3 ROS 2 June 14, 2010

MI‐10‐11 List of Properties proposed to be Rezoned to ROS ID # Parcel ID Property Address Owner Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 73 ED05‐067.15‐01‐01.00 HITCHING POST DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC RG‐3 ROS 74 ED05‐067.15‐01‐01.00 HITCHING POST DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC RG‐3 ROS 75 ED05‐067.15‐01‐76.00 45 QUAIL HOLLOW DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC R‐8 ROS 76 ED05‐067.19‐01‐01.00 HITCHING POST DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC RG‐3 ROS 77 ED05‐067.19‐01‐25.00 HERITAGE DR HAMLET HOMES ASSOC RG‐3 ROS 78 ED05‐067.19‐04‐44.00 MONT BLANC BLVD FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R‐8 ROS 79 ED05‐067.19‐04‐45.00 41 HOMBERG CIR FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R‐8 ROS 80 ED05‐067.19‐04‐46.00 HOMBERG CIR FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R‐8 ROS 81 ED05‐067.19‐04‐48.00 109 MONT BLANC BLVD FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R‐8, COZ‐1 ROS. COZ‐1 82 ED05‐067.19‐04‐54.00 MONT BLANC BLVD FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R‐8, COZ‐1 ROS, COZ‐1 83 ED05‐067.19‐04‐47.00 209 MONT BLANC BLVD FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R‐8, COZ‐1 ROS, COZ‐1 84 ED05‐067.19‐04‐53.00 SAULSBURY RD FOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC R‐8, COZ‐1 ROS, COZ‐1 85 ED05‐076.07‐02‐32.00 744 BICENTENNIAL BLVD CITY OF DOVER R‐8 ROS 86 ED05‐076.06‐05‐60.00 GEORGE WASHINGTON DR CITY OF DOVER RM‐1 ROS 87 ED05‐076.06‐07‐06.01 GEORGE WASHINGTON DR CITY OF DOVER RG‐2 ROS 88 ED05‐076.06‐05‐01.00 INDEPENDENCE BLVD CITY OF DOVER‐ Continental Park RG‐3 ROS 89 ED05‐076.06‐04‐26.00 43 LAMPLIGHTER LN THE GREENS TOWN MEETING ASSOC RG‐3 ROS 90 ED05‐076.06‐04‐26.00 43 LAMPLIGHTER LN THE GREENS TOWN MEETING ASSOC RG‐3 ROS 91 ED05 076. ‐076.06‐02‐12.01 GREENS OF DOVER CITY OF DOVER RG‐3 ROS 92 ED05‐076.11‐01‐36.00 SAULSBURY RD CITY OF DOVER‐ Saulsbury Park RG‐1, COZ‐1 ROS, COZ‐1 93 ED05‐067.00‐02‐35.00 425 COLLEGE RD CITY OF DOVER IO ROS 94 ED05‐067.00‐02‐23.00 COLLEGE RD SUNSET MEMORIAL GARDENS INC R‐20 ROS 95 ED05‐067.11‐01‐12.00 WOODCREST DR CITY OF DOVER R‐8 ROS 96 ED05‐067.15‐05‐30.00 BUTTNER PL OAKRIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC RG‐3 ROS 97 ED05‐067.12‐03‐35.00 SILVER LAKE BLVD SILVER LAKE TOWNHOUSE COMM RG‐3 ROS 98 ED05‐067.12‐03‐35.00 SILVER LAKE BLVD SILVER LAKE TOWNHOUSE COMM RG‐3 ROS 99 ED05‐067.12‐03‐35.00 SILVER LAKE BLVD SILVER LAKE TOWNHOUSE COMM RG‐3 ROS 100 ED05‐067.12‐03‐36.00 SILVER LAKE BLVD SILVER LAKE TOWNHOUSE COMM RG‐3 ROS 101 ED05‐067.16‐02‐89.00 WALKER RD CITY OF DOVER‐ Richardson Park R‐20 ROS 102 ED05‐068.09‐01‐84.00 OVERLOOK PL THE OVERLOOK ON SILVER LAKE RG‐3 ROS 103 ED05‐067.16‐02‐90.00 N GOVERNORS AVE CITY OF DOVER R‐8 ROS 104 ED05‐068.13‐01‐02.00 N STATE ST WESLEY METHODIST CHURCH R‐8 ROS 105 ED05‐067.20‐03‐01.00 422 N NEW ST CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS IO ROS 106 ED05‐067.20‐03‐02.00 414 N NEW ST CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS IO ROS 107 ED05‐068.17‐01‐32.00 RODNEY RD WHATCOAT METHODIST CHURCH R‐8 ROS 108 ED05‐068.17‐03‐16.00 WASHINGTON ST CITY OF DOVER‐ Silver Lake R‐8 ROS 3 June 14, 2010

MI‐10‐11 List of Properties proposed to be Rezoned to ROS ID # Parcel ID Property Address Owner Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 109 ED05‐068.17‐03‐25.00 ST JONES RIVER CITY OF DOVER‐ Silver Lake R‐20 ROS 110 ED05‐068.17‐03‐26.00 ST JONES RIVER CITY OF DOVER‐ Silver Lake R‐20 ROS 111 ED05‐077.05‐02‐48.00 230 KINGS HWY CITY OF DOVER‐ Silver Lake R‐8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 112 ED05‐077.05‐04‐48.00 PARK DR CITY OF DOVER‐ Memorial Park R‐10 ROS 113 ED05‐077.06‐01‐72.00 E LOOCKERMAN ST CITY OF DOVER R‐10 ROS 114 ED05‐077.09‐05‐14.00 COURT ST STATE OF DELAWARE IO, H ROS 115 ED05‐077.09‐05‐16.00 410 LEGISLATIVE AVE STATE OF DELAWARE IO, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H 116 ED05‐077.09‐05‐27.00 THE GREEN CITY OF DOVER‐ The Green RGO, SWPOZ, H ROS, SWPOZ, H 117 ED05‐077.09‐04‐64.00 THE GREEN CITY OF DOVER‐ The Green RGO, H ROS, H 118 ED05‐077.10‐01‐01.00 EAST AVE STATE OF DELAWARE IO, H ROS 119 ED05‐077.14‐01‐19.00 S DUPONT HWY CITY OF DOVER‐ Paul's Property RG‐2 ROS 120 ED05‐077.13‐01‐32.00 S NEW ST CITY OF DOVER‐ Dover St. & New St. R‐8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 121 ED05‐077.13‐01‐30.00 S QUEEN ST STATE OF DELAWARE R‐8 and CPO, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 122 ED05‐076.20‐03‐31.00 WESTVIEW TER CITY OF DOVER‐ Woodbrook R‐10 ROS 123 ED05‐076.20‐03‐33.00 WOODSEDGE RD CITY OF DOVER‐ Woodbrook R‐10 ROS 124 ED05‐086.05‐01‐01.00 1052 S GOVERNORS AVE APT IRRIG WOODBROOK DEV LLC R‐10 ROS 125 ED05‐085.08‐02‐35.00 NEW BURTON RD CITY OF DOVER‐ Crossgates R‐10 ROS 126 ED05‐085.12‐01‐06.00 BLUE BEACH DR CITY OF DOVER‐ Mayfair R‐8 ROS 127 ED05 085. ‐085.12‐01‐02.00 BLUE BEACH DR CITY OF DOVER‐ Mayfair R‐8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 128 ED05‐085.11‐01‐53.00 TURNER DR CITY OF DOVER‐ Turner Park R‐8 ROS 129 ED05‐086.00‐02‐05.00 1547 S DUPONT HWY STATE OF DELAWARE CPO ROS 130 ED05‐086.00‐02‐04.00 S DUPONT HWY STATE OF DELAWARE CPO ROS 131 ED05‐086.00‐02‐15.00 16 S STATE ST STATE OF DELAWARE CPO ROS 132 ED05‐086.06‐01‐01.00 45 S DUPONT HWY STATE OF DELAWARE R‐20 ROS 133 ED05‐086.06‐01‐01.00 45 S DUPONT HWY STATE OF DELAWARE R‐20 ROS 134 ED05‐077.18‐02‐92.00 ST JONES RIVER CITY OF DOVER IO ROS 135 ED05‐077.11‐03‐43.00 HOLMES ST COUNTRY LIVING HOMES LLC R‐8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ 136 ED05‐068.19‐02‐85.00 SHADYBROOK DR ACORN FARMS LTD R‐8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ 137 ED05‐068.19‐02‐85.00 SHADYBROOK DR ACORN FARMS LTD R‐8 ROS 138 ED05‐068.19‐02‐86.00 N LITTLE CREEK RD CITY OF DOVER‐ Acorn Farms R‐8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ 139 ED05‐068.19‐02‐85.00 SHADYBROOK DR ACORN FARMS LTD R‐8, AEOZ ROS, AEOZ 140 ED05‐068.19‐01‐31.00 NIXON LN CITY OF DOVER‐ Dover Park R‐20 ROS 141 ED05‐068.19‐01‐28.00 NIXON LN CITY OF DOVER‐ Dover Park R‐20 ROS 142 ED05‐068.19‐01‐30.00 NIXON LN CITY OF DOVER‐ Dover Park R‐20 ROS 143 ED05‐068.19‐01‐29.00 NIXON LN CITY OF DOVER‐ Dover Park R‐20 ROS 144 ED05‐068.15‐01‐05.00 ACORN LN CITY OF DOVER‐ Dover Park R‐20 ROS 4 June 14, 2010

MI‐10‐11 List of Properties proposed to be Rezoned to ROS ID # Parcel ID Property Address Owner Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 145 ED05‐068.15‐01‐01.00 1210 WHITE OAK RD CITY OF DOVER‐ DoverPark R‐20 ROS 146 ED05‐068.10‐01‐63.00 TOWNSEND BLVD CITY OF DOVER‐ Williams Park R‐8 ROS 147 LC05‐068.10‐01‐02.00 TOWNSEND BLVD CITY OF DOVER‐ Williams Park R‐8 ROS 148 LC05‐068.10‐01‐02.00 TOWNSEND BLVD CITY OF DOVER R‐8 ROS 149 ED05‐068.10‐01‐63.00 TOWNSEND BLVD CITY OF DOVER R‐8, SWPOZ ROS, SWPOZ 150 LC05‐058.17‐03‐42.00 110 PERSIMMON CIR PERSIMMON PARK PLACE MHP ROS 5 June 14, 2010

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-21 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF 2 DOVER BY CHANGING ZONING DESIGNATIONS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO THE 3 RECREATIONAL AND OPEN SPACE (ROS) ZONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2008 4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED ON NOVEMBER 23, 2009. 5 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within the limits 6 of the City of Dover; and 7 WHEREAS, Delaware Code, Title 22, Chapter 3 Municipal Zoning Regulations, Section 303, Purpose of 8 Regulations, states that zoning regulations shall be made in accordance with a Comprehensive Plan and 9 designed to lessen congestion in the streets, to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, to provide 10 health, general welfare, adequate light and air, to prevent the overcrowding of land, to avoid undue 11 concentration of population, and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewage, schools, 12 parks, and other public requirements; and 13 WHEREAS, Delaware Code, Title 22, Chapter 7 Planning Commission, Section 702 (c) Comprehensive 14 Development Plan, states that the Comprehensive Plan shall be the basis for the development of zoning 15 regulations and that upon adoption of the Comprehensive Development Plan, the official zoning map shall be 16 amended to rezone all lands within the municipality in accordance with the uses of land provided for in the 17 Comprehensive Development Plan; and 18 WHEREAS, the City of Dover adopted the City of Dover 2008 Comprehensive Plan on February 9, 2009 and 19 amended such on November 23, 2009; and 20 WHEREAS, on June 14, 2010, Dover City Council adopted Ordinance #2010-12, amending Appendix B - 21 Zoning to create the Recreational and Open Space (ROS) zone. 22 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has prepared a map for the Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS Rezoning, 23 showing recommendations to change zoning designations of specific properties to Recreational and Open Space 24 (ROS) zone so that the City of Dover Zoning Map is in accordance with the adopted 2008 Comprehensive Plan, 25 as amended on November 23, 2009. 26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, 27 IN COUNCIL MET: 28 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance 29 of the City of Dover is amended by changing the zoning designations of specific properties to Recreational and 30 Open Space (ROS) zone as depicted on the map entitled "City of Dover Comprehensive Rezoning 2010: ROS 31 Rezoning" dated August 9, 2010. 32 ADOPTED: * 33 SYNOPSIS 34 The proposed ordinance would rezone certain properties to the Recreational and Open Space (ROS) 35 Zone in conformance with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, as required by Delaware Code. 36 Actions History 37 June 28, 2010 - Introduction/First Reading at Council

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2010-20 1 WHEREAS, the 2010/2011 fiscal year property tax rate for the City of Dover is $.33(thirty-three 2 cents) per hundred of assessed value and the Tax Assessor reported that the total assessed value of 3 property as of December 31, 2009 was $2,911,319,620 and that the Supplement Billings for April 4 2010 were $2,219,200 making the FY 2011 (2005 Assessed Value) base $2,913,538,820; and 5 WHEREAS, upon completion of the re-evaluation completed in 2010, the Tax Assessor is reporting 6 that the total assessed value in 2009/2010 to be $3,093,511,459; and 7 WHEREAS, Delaware State Law: 22 Delaware Code Section 1105 (b) requires municipalities to 8 calculate a "rolled-back" tax rate so as to provide the same tax revenue as was levied during the prior 9 fiscal year and to state that the percent, if any, by which the property tax rate to be levied exceeds 10 the "rolled-back" property tax rate. 11 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY 12 OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 13 That the City of Dover "rolled-back" tax rate is $.3108 per hundred of assessed value, and 2010/2011 14 tax rate is to be set at $.3378 per hundred of assessed value, the increase over the rolled-back tax rate 15 being 8.68% 16 ADOPTED: * 17 Actions History 18 June 14, 2010 - First Reading

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2010‐19 1 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES 2 3 GENERAL FUND ‐ CASH RECEIPTS AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 4 5 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 6 7 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Thirty Seven Million Seven Hundred Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Six 8 dollars ($37,709,966)or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 9 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 10 and ending June 30, 2011: 11 2009/10 2010/11 12 RECEIPTS REVISED BUDGET 13 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 3,628,890 $ 2,277,575 14 FINES AND POLICE REVENUE 520,000 536,502 15 911 FEE 45,000 45,000 16 INVESTMENT INCOME 253,000 224,000 17 LIBRARY REVENUES 66,508 64,189 18 KENT COUNTY BOOK REIMBURSEMENT 460,000 460,000 19 BUSINESS LICENSES 1,465,000 1,523,675 20 PERMITS AND OTHER LICENSES 934,000 934,000 21 DEMOLITION REVENUE ‐ ‐ 22 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 54,250 54,250 23 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 300,000 300,000 24 PROPERTY TAXES 10,155,246 10,982,634 25 BID REVENUE 52,692 52,692 26 RECREATION REVENUE 141,500 141,500 27 FRANCHISE FEE 486,000 486,000 28 TRASH FEES 1,201,000 2,244,511 29 DSWA TRASH FEE REBATE 160,000 143,000 30 RENT REVENUE ‐ GARRISON FARM 41,535 87,000 31 COURT OF CHANCERY FEES 645,000 645,000 32 RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 20,609,621 21,201,528 33 34 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS 35 INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS WATER/WASTEWATER 968,999 975,872 36 INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS ELECTRIC 3,379,975 3,387,873 37 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 4,348,974 4,363,745 38 39 GRANTS 40 POLICE RELATED 100,000 138,350 41 CAPITAL SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE 73,500 73,500 42 POLICE PENSION GRANT 620,000 620,000 43 RECREATION GRANTS ‐ ‐ 44 MISC GRANT REVENUE ‐ ‐ 45 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT ‐ ‐ 46 SALE OF ASSETS ‐ ‐ 47 GRANTS SUBTOTAL 793,500 831,850 48 49 TRANSFERS FROM ‐ 50 TRANSFER TAX 830,000 1,000,000 51 MUNICIPAL STREET AID ‐ 526,843 52 CIVIL TRAFFIC PENALTIES 750,000 930,000 53 WATER/WASTEWATER 548,020 ‐ 54 ELECTRIC 6,758,100 8,856,000 55 PARKLAND RESERVE ‐ ‐ 56 LIBRARY RESERVE ‐ ‐ 57 CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ 58 WORKER'S COMP FUND 350,000 ‐ 59 CONTINGENCY FUND 9,236,120 11,312,843 60 TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL 61 $ 34,988,215 $ 37,709,966 62 TOTALS 63 1

64 GENERAL FUND CONTINUED ‐ CASH RECEIPTS AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 65 2009/10 2010/11 66 DEPARTMENT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 67 CITY CLERK $ 278,229 $ 287,403 68 COUNCIL 113,934 142,619 69 TAX ASSESSOR 565,924 197,249 70 FIRE 718,058 709,862 71 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 1,104,457 1,055,557 72 LIBRARY 1,128,481 1,126,227 73 RECREATION 754,140 789,648 74 LIFE SAFETY 508,320 501,835 75 CODE INFORCEMENT 359,064 276,481 76 PLANNING 400,895 424,836 77 INSPECTIONS 509,371 494,807 78 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 223,350 247,488 79 POLICE 12,307,566 12,458,373 80 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 449,516 449,516 81 STREETS 895,084 802,029 82 SANITATION 2,078,770 2,347,344 83 CITY MANAGER 566,474 569,096 84 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 797,071 748,214 85 FINANCE 781,791 827,169 86 PUBLIC SERVICES ‐ ADMINISTRATION 354,640 369,752 87 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 996,515 990,757 88 CENTRAL SERVICES 714,165 669,977 89 FLEET MAINTENANCE 712,645 761,929 90 CUSTOMER SERVICES 889,919 869,404 91 HUMAN RESOURCES 430,037 358,890 92 MAYOR 70,699 90,291 93 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTALS 28,709,115 28,566,753 94 OTHER EXPENSES 95 DEBT SERVICE 328,410 331,800 96 TRANSFER TO CONTINGENCY ‐ ‐ 97 DSWA RECYCLING PROGRAM ‐ ‐ 98 INSURANCE 600,000 600,000 99 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 1,014,820 1,297,509 100 RETIREES PAYMENTS ‐ ‐ 101 UNCOLLECTIBLES ‐ TRASH AND OTHER 10,000 10,000 102 LOSS ON SALE OF ASSET 42,993 ‐ 103 STORM EMERGENCY 350,000 ‐ 104 STREET LIGHTS 985,000 985,000 105 OTHER EXPENSE SUBTOTAL 3,331,223 3,224,309 106 GRANTS 107 IT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN ‐ ‐ 108 GRANTS SUBTOTAL ‐ ‐ 109 TRANSFERS 110 TRANSFER TO OPEB ‐ ‐ 111 TRANSFER TO PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY ‐ 995,000 112 TRANSFER TO POLICE PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 95,000 113 TRANSFER TO PENSION COLA ‐ ‐ 114 TRANSFER TO POLICE PENSION FUND 620,000 620,000 115 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ 116 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND ‐ PROJECTS 44,802 1,307,839 117 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND ‐ RESERVE ‐ ‐ 118 TRANSFER TO STREET PROGRAM ‐ 119 TRANSFER TO PARKLAND/RECREATION RESERVE ‐ 120 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY RESERVE ‐ 121 TRANSFER TO CDBG FUND 5,500 6,000 122 TRANSFER TO VERIZON RESERVE ‐ 123 INVENTORY WRITE OFFS ‐ ‐ 124 TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL 670,302 3,023,839 125 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 2,277,575 2,895,065 126 127 TOTALS $ 34,988,215 $ 37,709,966 128 129 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 130 inter‐departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 131 department except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City 132 Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 2

133 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 134 135 GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 136 137 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 138 139 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 140 141 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Million Two Hundred Twenty Nine Thousand Two 142 Hundred Fifty Seven dollars ($8,229,257) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby 143 appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the 144 Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 145 146 CASH RECEIPTS 147 2009/10 2010/11 148 REVISED BUDGET 149 BEGINNING BALANCE ‐ PROJECTS $ 462,693 $ 65,479 150 STATE GRANTS 780,290 3,343,520 151 INTEREST EARNINGS 2,700 10,900 152 INCOME FROM SALE OF ASSETS 29,200 ‐ 153 RECREATION GRANTS ‐ ‐ 154 POLICE GRANTS ‐ 18,000 155 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS ‐ ‐ 156 LIBRARY BOND ISSUE/CONTRIBUTIONS 602,384 1,000,000 157 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND FOR PROJECTS 44,802 1,307,839 158 TRANSFER FROM PARKLAND RESERVE (JWP CNTR) 40,000 ‐ 159 TRANSFER FROM LIBRARY RESERVE 177,906 2,343,519 160 GIFTS/DONATIONS (RECREATION) ‐ ‐ 161 PARKLAND RESERVE RECEIPT ‐ ‐ 162 TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ 140,000 163 164 TOTALS $ 2,139,975 $ 8,229,257 165 166 3

167 GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND ‐ CONTINUED 168 169 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 170 171 EXPENSE SUMMARY 172 173 2009/10 2010/11 174 DEPARTMENT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 175 CITY CLERK $ ‐ $ ‐ 176 COUNCIL ‐ ‐ 177 TAX ASSESSOR ‐ ‐ 178 FIRE 292,210 288,210 179 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE ‐ 63,675 180 LIBRARY 1,560,580 6,687,039 181 RECREATION 70,000 45,000 182 LIFE SAFETY ‐ ‐ 183 PLANNING ‐ ‐ 184 INSPECTIONS ‐ ‐ 185 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ‐ ‐ 186 POLICE 94,706 282,380 187 STREETS 50,000 481,055 188 SANITATION ‐ 246,075 189 CITY MANAGER ‐ ‐ 190 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 7,000 12,000 191 FINANCE ‐ ‐ 192 PUBLIC SERVICES ‐ ADMINISTRATION ‐ ‐ 193 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ‐ ‐ 194 CENTRAL SERVICES ‐ ‐ 195 FLEET MAINTENANCE ‐ ‐ 196 CUSTOMER SERVICES ‐ ‐ 197 HUMAN RESOURCES ‐ ‐ 198 MAYOR ‐ 83,323 199 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTAL 2,074,496 8,188,757 200 TRANSFERS 201 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ 202 TRANSFER TO PARKLAND RESERVE ‐ ‐ 203 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY RESERVE ‐ ‐ 204 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND ‐ ‐ 205 TRANSFER SUBTOTAL ‐ ‐ 206 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 65,479 40,500 207 208 TOTALS $ 2,139,975 $ 8,229,257 209 210 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 211 inter‐departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 212 department except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City 213 Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 4

214 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 215 216 GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY 217 218 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 219 220 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy 221 One dollars ($417,971) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 222 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 223 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 224 225 CASH RECEIPTS 226 2009/10 2010/11 227 REVISED BUDGET 228 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 744,871 $ 394,871 229 INTEREST EARNINGS ‐ 23,100 230 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND ‐ ‐ 231 232 TOTALS $ 744,871 $ 417,971 233 234 EXPENSE SUMMARY 235 2009/10 2010/11 236 REVISED BUDGET 237 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ 350,000 $ ‐ 238 TRANSFER TO OPEB ‐ ‐ 239 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY FUND ‐ ‐ 240 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 394,871 417,971 241 242 TOTALS $ 744,871 $ 417,971 243 244 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 245 inter‐departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 246 department except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City 247 Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 5

248 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 249 250 GENERAL CAPITAL ASSET REPLACEMENT FUND 251 252 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 253 254 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 255 256 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Fifty Six Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Five 257 dollars ($256,465) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 258 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 259 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 260 261 CASH RECEIPTS 262 2009/10 2010/11 263 REVISED BUDGET 264 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 241,965 $ 248,965 265 INTEREST EARNINGS 7,000 7,500 266 TRANSFER FROM GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL FUND ‐ ‐ 267 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND ‐ ‐ 268 269 TOTALS $ 248,965 $ 256,465 270 271 EXPENSE SUMMARY 272 2009/10 2010/11 273 REVISED BUDGET 274 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ ‐ $ ‐ 275 FOR CAPITAL ITEMS ‐ ‐ 276 TRANSFER TO GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL FUND ‐ 140,000 277 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 248,965 116,465 278 279 TOTALS $ 248,965 $ 256,465 280 281 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 282 inter‐departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 283 department except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City 284 Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 6

285 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 286 287 MUNICIPAL STREET AID FUND 288 289 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 290 291 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 292 293 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Hundred Twenty Seven Thousand Four Hundred Seventy 294 One dollars ($527,471) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 295 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 296 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 297 298 CASH RECEIPTS 299 2009/10 2010/11 300 REVISED BUDGET 301 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 428 $ 428 302 STATE GRANT ‐ 526,843 303 INTEREST EARNED ‐ 200 304 305 TOTALS $ 428 $ 527,471 306 307 308 BUDGET SUMMARY 309 2009/10 2010/11 310 REVISED BUDGET 311 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ ‐ $ 526,843 312 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 428 628 313 314 TOTALS $ 428 $ 527,471 315 316 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 317 inter‐departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 318 department except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City 319 Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 7

320 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 321 322 WATER/WASTEWATER FUND 323 324 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 325 326 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 327 328 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Twelve Million Seven Hundred Thirty Eight Thousand Two Hundred 329 Thirty Seven dollars ($12,738,237) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 330 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 331 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 332 333 2009/10 2010/11 334 BASE REVENUE REVISED BUDGET 335 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE ‐ WATER $ 659,584 $ 943,545 336 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE ‐ WASTEWATER 327,614 585,053 337 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE ‐ KCSA (397,473) (1,632,876) 338 WATER FEES 4,130,000 4,206,700 339 WASTEWATER FEES 2,700,000 3,308,300 340 WASTEWATER ADJUSTMENT FEES 3,000,000 4,275,600 341 WATER TANK SPACE LEASING 293,669 299,400 342 SEWER IMPACT FEES 320,000 323,000 343 WATER IMPACT FEES 250,000 357,000 344 INTEREST ‐ WATER 900 680 345 INTEREST ‐ WASTEWATER 1,100 835 346 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE 71,000 71,000 347 REVENUE SUBTOTAL 11,356,394 12,738,237 348 349 GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS 350 STATE REIMBURSEMENT ‐ ‐ 351 GRANT REVENUE ‐ ‐ 352 GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS SUBTOTAL ‐ ‐ 353 354 TRANSFERS FROM 355 TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ 356 TRANSFER FROM CONTINGENCY ‐ ‐ 357 TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL ‐ ‐ 358 359 TOTALS $ 11,356,394 $ 12,738,237 8

360 WATER/WASTEWATER FUND ‐ CONTINUED 361 362 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 363 364 2009/10 2010/11 365 DIRECT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 366 ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ 708,360 $ 642,878 367 WATER CONSTRUCTION 421,040 392,561 368 WATER DEPARTMENT 421,268 412,588 369 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 1,519,732 1,499,857 370 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 879,992 969,762 371 METER READING 71,350 ‐ 372 KENT COUNTY TREATMENT CHARGE 4,235,403 4,235,403 373 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL 8,257,145 8,153,049 374 375 OTHER EXPENSES 376 DEBT SERVICE ‐ WATER 244,000 246,403 377 DEBT SERVICE ‐ WASTEWATER 216,000 316,198 378 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 134,680 177,427 379 INTRAFUND SERVICE FEES 1,250,827 1,275,314 380 ARBITRAGE PAYMENT 60/40 Water ‐ 381 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 1,845,507 2,015,342 382 383 TRANSFER TO 384 GENERAL FUND FROM WATER 231,459 ‐ 385 GENERAL FUND FROM WASTEWATER 316,561 ‐ 386 WATER IMP AND EXT 500,000 500,000 387 WASTEWATER IMP AND EXT 200,000 500,000 388 TRANSFER TO OPEB ‐ ‐ 389 TRANSFER TO PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY ‐ 372,000 390 TRANSFER TO PENSION COLA ‐ ‐ 391 EWER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 104,000 6,802 392 WATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 6,000 110,597 393 CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE WATER ‐ 100,000 394 CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE WASTEWATER ‐ 100,000 395 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 1,358,020 1,689,399 396 397 CURRENT YEAR BALANCES 398 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE WATER 943,545 1,347,009 399 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE WASTEWATER 585,053 1,126,117 400 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE KCSA (1,632,876) (1,592,679) 401 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS (104,278) 880,447 402 403 TOTALS $ 11,356,394 $ 12,738,237 404 405 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 406 inter‐departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 407 department except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City 408 Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 9

409 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 410 411 WATER/WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION FUND 412 413 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 414 415 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 416 417 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Million Five Hundred Forty Five Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Nine 418 dollars ($5,545,339) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 419 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning 420 July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 421 422 CASH RECEIPTS 423 2009/10 2010/11 424 REVISED BUDGET 425 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE ‐ WATER $ 1,631,844 $ 743,431 426 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE ‐ WASTEWATER 625,152 257,168 427 PRIOR YEAR BOND PROCEED BALANCE SERIES 2009 ‐ ‐ 428 PRIOR YEAR BOND PROCEEDS ‐ WASTEWATER ‐ 286,500 429 BOND PROCEEDS ‐ WATER ‐ ‐ 430 BOND PROCEEDS ‐ WASTEWATER ‐ 3,016,200 431 STATE LOAN FUND ‐ WATER 2,404,017 ‐ 432 STATE LOAN FUND ‐ WASTEWATER 5,942,481 ‐ 433 TRANS FR WATER/WASTEWATER FOR WATER 500,000 500,000 434 TRANS FR WATER/WASTEWATER FOR WASTEWATER 200,000 500,000 435 TRANSFER FROM IMPACT FEE RESERVE 518,230 242,040 436 TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐WATER ‐ ‐ 437 TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐WASTEWATER ‐ ‐ 438 MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS ‐ ‐ 439 INCOME FROM SALE OF ASSETS ‐ ‐ 440 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS ‐ ‐ 441 FEDERAL/STATE GRANTS 45,248 ‐ 442 INTEREST INCOME ‐ ‐ 443 444 TOTALS $ 11,866,972 $ 5,545,339 445 446 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 447 448 EXPENSE SUMMARY 449 2009/10 2010/11 450 REVISED BUDGET 451 WATER $ 3,753,430 $ 620,000 452 WASTEWATER 6,787,443 1,560,700 453 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 39,000 ‐ 454 WATER CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ 455 ENGINEERING & INSPECTION ‐ ‐ 456 TRANSFER TO IMPACT FEE RESERVE ‐ ‐ 457 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE ‐ WATER BOND ‐ ‐ 458 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE ‐ WASTEWATER BOND 286,500 2,153,140 459 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE ‐ WATER 743,431 623,431 460 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE ‐ WASTEWATER 257,168 588,068 461 462 TOTALS $ 11,866,972 $ 5,545,339 463 464 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 465 inter‐departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 466 department except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City 467 Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 10

468 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 469 470 WATER/WASTEWATER CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 471 472 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 473 474 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 475 476 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Hundred Eighty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy 477 dollars ($487,770) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 478 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 479 beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 480 481 CASH RECEIPTS 482 2009/10 2010/11 483 REVISED BUDGET 484 BEGINNING BALANCE ‐ WATER $ 205,611 $ 212,603 485 BEGINNING BALANCE ‐ WASTEWATER 64,560 66,767 486 INTEREST EARNINGS ‐ WATER 6,991 6,400 487 INTEREST EARNINGS ‐ WASTEWATER 2,208 2,000 488 TRANSFER FROM WATER/WASTEWATER FUND ‐ 100,000 489 TRANSFER FROM WATER/WASTEWATER CONTINGENCY ‐ 100,000 490 491 TOTALS $ 279,370 $ 487,770 492 493 EXPENSE SUMMARY 494 2009/10 2010/11 495 REVISED BUDGET 496 TRANSFER TO WATER/WASTEWATER I &E FUND $ ‐ $ ‐ 497 TRANSFER TO WASTEWATER I &E FUND ‐ ‐ 498 TRANSFER TO WATER/WASTEWATER ‐ ‐ 499 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR WATER 212,603 319,003 500 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR WASTEWATER 66,767 168,767 501 502 TOTALS $ 279,370 $ 487,770 503 504 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 505 inter‐departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 506 department except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City 507 Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 11

508 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 509 510 WATER/WASTEWATER CONTINGENCY RESERVE 511 512 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 513 514 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 515 516 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Sixty Eight Thousand One Hundred Eighty Two 517 dollars ($268,182) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 518 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 519 beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 520 521 CASH RECEIPTS 522 2009/10 2010/11 523 REVISED BUDGET 524 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 251,601 $ 260,371 525 INTEREST EARNINGS 8,770 7,811 526 TRANSFER FROM WATER/WASTEWATER ‐ 527 528 TOTALS $ 260,371 $ 268,182 529 530 BUDGET SUMMARY 531 2009/10 2010/11 532 REVISED BUDGET 533 TRANSFER TO WATER $ ‐ $ ‐ 534 TRANSFER TO WASTEWATER ‐ ‐ 535 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE ‐ ‐ 536 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 260,371 268,182 537 538 TOTALS $ 260,371 $ 268,182 539 540 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 541 inter‐departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 542 department except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City 543 Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 12

544 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 545 546 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND 547 548 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 549 550 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 551 552 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Hundred Ten Million One Hundred Eighteen Thousand 553 One Hundred Thirty Three dollars ($110,118,133) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby 554 appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the 555 Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 556 557 2009/10 2010/11 558 REVISED BUDGET 559 BASE REVENUE 560 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 11,415,737 $ 12,086,275 561 DIRECT SALES TO CUSTOMER 95,830,100 96,595,300 562 PURCHASE POWER ADJUSTMENT ‐ (2,000,000) 563 UTILITY TAX 1,850,000 1,864,800 564 GREEN ENERGY 128,600 128,600 565 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 891,200 891,200 566 RENT REVENUE 186,816 186,816 567 EMISSION CREDIT SALES 274,000 ‐ 568 TRANSFER FROM RATE STABILIZATION ‐ ‐ 569 INTRAFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS WATER/WASTEWATER 281,828 299,442 570 REIMBURSEMENT OF BOND ISSUANCE COST ‐ ‐ 571 INTEREST EARNINGS 57,000 65,700 572 573 TOTALS $ 110,915,281 $ 110,118,133 13

574 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND ‐ CONTINUED 575 576 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 577 578 2009/10 2010/11 579 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 580 POWER SUPPLY $ 55,619,481 $ 48,059,699 581 POWER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 3,000,000 2,280,000 582 PJM CHARGES ‐ LOAD 7,356,438 11,850,876 583 CAPACITY CHARGES 13,456,389 11,618,223 584 RATE STABILIZATION CREDIT ‐ ‐ 585 SUB‐TOTAL POWER SUPPLY 79,432,308 73,808,798 586 PLANT OPERATIONS 5,768,710 5,694,315 587 GENERATIONS FUELS 213,529 297,820 588 PJM CREDITS (520,842) (720,797) 589 CAPACITY CREDITS (12,135,127) (11,488,785) 590 GENERATION SUBTOTAL (6,673,730) (6,217,447) 591 POWER SUPPLY & GENERATION SUBTOTAL 72,758,578 67,591,351 592 593 DIRECT EXPENDITURES 594 TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION 3,215,601 3,206,515 595 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 1,359,569 1,842,903 596 ADMINISTRATION 679,558 609,169 597 METER READING 281,614 222,908 598 SYSTEMS OPERATIONS 488,131 518,053 599 UTILITY TAX 1,850,000 1,864,800 600 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTALS 7,874,473 8,264,348 601 602 OTHER EXPENSES 603 ALLOW FOR UNCOLLECTIBLES 135,000 135,000 604 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 567,430 639,110 605 GREEN ENERGY PAYMENT TO DEMEC 128,600 128,600 606 INTRAFUND SERVICE FEES 3,379,975 3,387,873 607 INTEREST ON DEPOSITS 54,500 54,500 608 INVENTORY WRITE OFFS 175,000 175,000 609 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS ‐ ‐ 610 POWER SUPPLY STUDY 457,250 ‐ 611 DEBT SERVICE 3,956,600 4,058,700 612 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 8,854,355 8,578,783 613 TRANSFER TO 614 IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION 2,500,000 3,500,000 615 GENERAL FUND 6,758,100 8,856,000 616 TRANSFER TO CONTINGENCY 83,500 ‐ 617 TRANSFER TO PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY ‐ 833,000 618 TRANSFER TO PENSION COLA ‐ ‐ 619 TRANSFER TO OPEB ‐ 1,200,000 620 TRANSFER TO DEPRECIATION RESERVE ‐ 1,250,000 621 TRANSFER FUTURE CAPACITY ‐ ‐ 622 RATE STABILIZATION RESERVE ‐ 1,300,000 623 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 9,341,600 16,939,000 624 625 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 12,086,275 8,744,651 626 627 TOTALS $ 110,915,281 $ 110,118,133 628 629 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 630 inter‐departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 631 department except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City 632 Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 14

633 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 634 635 ELECTRIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION FUND 636 637 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 638 639 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 640 641 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Million Two Hundred Twenty Nine Thousand Five Hundred 642 Sixty One dollars ($5,229,561) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 643 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal 644 year beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 645 646 CASH RECEIPTS 647 2009/10 2010/11 648 REVISED BUDGET 649 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 2,625,760 $ 1,688,861 650 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE BOND 4,240,034 ‐ 651 INTEREST EARNINGS 25,000 40,700 652 INTEREST TRUSTEE 2,599 ‐ 653 INCOME FROM SALE OF ASSETS ‐ ‐ 654 ELECTRIC NEW SERVICE FEES ‐ ‐ 655 RECEIPT FROM DEPRECIATION RESERVE ‐ ‐ 656 RECEIPT FROM FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE ‐ ‐ 657 DEMA GRANT ‐ ‐ 658 STATE REIMBURSEMENT FOR SR1 &SR9 ‐ ‐ 659 STATE REIMBURSEMENT FOR GOVS AVE 710,318 ‐ 660 STATE GRANTS 105,723 ‐ 661 FEDERAL GRANTS 135,153 ‐ 662 BOND ISSUE 2008 ‐ ‐ 663 664 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC 2,500,000 3,500,000 665 666 TOTALS $ 10,344,587 $ 5,229,561 667 668 EXPENSE SUMMARY 669 2009/10 2010/11 670 REVISED BUDGET 671 672 ELECTRIC GENERATION $ 1,576,645 $ 1,480,068 673 TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION 1,108,147 739,000 674 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 5,865,211 1,390,429 675 ADMINISTRATION 105,723 ‐ 676 METER READING ‐ ‐ 677 SYSTEMS OPERATIONS ‐ ‐ 678 TRANSFER TO DEPRECIATION RESERVE ‐ ‐ 679 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 1,688,861 1,620,064 680 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE ‐BOND ‐ ‐ 681 682 TOTALS $ 10,344,587 $ 5,229,561 683 684 685 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make inter‐departmental 686 transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department except that the City 687 Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 15

688 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 689 690 ELECTRIC UTILITY CONTINGENCY RESERVE 691 692 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 693 694 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 695 696 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Seventy One Thousand Fifty Four dollars 697 ($1,071,054) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 698 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 699 beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 700 701 CASH RECEIPTS 702 2009/10 2010/11 703 REVISED BUDGET 704 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 928,654 $ 1,039,854 705 INTEREST EARNINGS 27,700 31,200 706 TRANSFER FROM INSURANCE STABILIZATION ‐ ‐ 707 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC REVENUE 83,500 ‐ 708 709 TOTALS $ 1,039,854 $ 1,071,054 710 711 EXPENSE SUMMARY 712 2009/10 2010/11 713 REVISED BUDGET 714 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC FUND $ ‐ $ ‐ 715 TRANSFER TO RATE STABILIZATION FUND ‐ ‐ 716 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 1,039,854 1,071,054 717 718 TOTALS $ 1,039,854 $ 1,071,054 719 720 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make inter‐ 721 departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department 722 except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 16

723 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 724 725 ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPRECIATION RESERVE 726 727 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2010‐2011 728 729 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 730 731 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Nine Million Five Hundred Seventy Two Thousand 732 Three Hundred Ninety dollars ($9,572,390) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby 733 appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the 734 Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 735 736 CASH RECEIPTS 737 2009/10 2010/11 738 REVISED BUDGET 739 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 7,789,990 $ 8,079,990 740 RECEIPT FROM ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND ‐ 1,250,000 741 INTEREST EARNINGS 290,000 242,400 742 743 TOTALS $ 8,079,990 $ 9,572,390 744 745 BUDGET SUMMARY 746 2009/10 2010/11 747 REVISED BUDGET 748 TRANSFER TO IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION $ ‐ $ ‐ 749 TRANSFER TO INSURANCE STABILIZATION ‐ ‐ 750 FOR CAPITAL ITEMS ‐ ‐ 751 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 8,079,990 9,572,390 752 753 TOTALS $ 8,079,990 $ 9,572,390 754 755 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make inter‐ 756 departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department 757 except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 17

758 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 759 760 ELECTRIC UTILITY FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE 761 762 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2010‐2011 763 764 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 765 766 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Nine Million Two Hundred Ninety Four Thousand Five Hundred Sixty 767 Three dollars ($9,294,563) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 768 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 769 beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 770 771 CASH RECEIPTS 772 2009/10 2010/11 773 REVISED BUDGET 774 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 8,763,863 $ 9,023,863 775 RECEIPT FROM ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND ‐ ‐ 776 INTEREST EARNINGS 260,000 270,700 777 778 TOTALS $ 9,023,863 $ 9,294,563 779 780 BUDGET SUMMARY 781 2009/10 2010/11 782 REVISED BUDGET 783 TRANSFER TO IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION $ ‐ $ ‐ 784 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 9,023,863 9,294,563 785 786 TOTALS $ 9,023,863 $ 9,294,563 787 788 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make inter‐ 789 departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department 790 except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 18

791 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 792 793 ELECTRIC UTILITY INSURANCE STABLIZATION RESERVE 794 795 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2010‐2011 796 797 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 798 799 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Hundred Eight Thousand Five Hundred Three dollars 800 ($408,503) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 801 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 802 beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 803 804 CASH RECEIPTS 805 2009/10 2010/11 806 REVISED BUDGET 807 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 385,103 $ 396,603 808 RECEIPT FROM ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND ‐ ‐ 809 RECEIPT FROM ELECTRIC DEPRECIATION RESERVE FUND ‐ ‐ 810 INTEREST EARNINGS 11,500 11,900 811 812 TOTALS $ 396,603 $ 408,503 813 814 BUDGET SUMMARY 815 2009/10 2010/11 816 REVISED BUDGET 817 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC REVENUE CONTINGENCY $ ‐ $ ‐ 818 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 396,603 408,503 819 820 TOTALS $ 396,603 $ 408,503 821 822 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make inter‐ 823 departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department 824 except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 19

825 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 826 827 ELECTRIC UTILITY RATE STABLIZATION RESERVE 828 829 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2010‐2011 830 831 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 832 833 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Six Million One Hundred Seventy One Thousand Twenty Seven 834 dollars ($6,171,027) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 835 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 836 beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 837 838 CASH RECEIPTS 839 2009/10 2010/11 840 REVISED BUDGET 841 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 4,652,527 $ 4,729,127 842 RECEIPT FROM ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND ‐ 1,300,000 843 RECEIPT FROM ELECTRIC CONTINGENCY ‐ ‐ 844 INTEREST EARNINGS 76,600 141,900 845 846 TOTALS $ 4,729,127 $ 6,171,027 847 848 BUDGET SUMMARY 849 2009/10 2010/11 850 REVISED BUDGET 851 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC FUND $ ‐ $ ‐ 852 853 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 4,729,127 6,171,027 854 855 TOTALS $ 4,729,127 $ 6,171,027 856 857 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make inter‐ 858 departmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department 859 except that the City Manager shall not make any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306 and/or #F306ADD. 20

860 2010‐2011 BUDGET ORDINANCES ‐ CONTINUED 861 862 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND 863 864 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2010‐2011 865 866 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 867 868 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Million Fifty Two Thousand Nine Hundred Seventeen dollars 869 ($2,052,917) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 870 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 871 beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011: 872 873