This text was pulled from the PDF automatically and may contain mistakes. The PDF is the official record, so check it before relying on this.
Page 1
CITY OF DOVER HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
AGENDA
THURSDAY, November 21, 2019 – 3:30 PM
City Hall – Conference Room
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MEETING on September 19, 2019
COMMUNICATIONS & REPORTS
1. Summary of Activity
a. Summary of Applications 2018 and 2019
b. Summary of Architectural Review Certifications for 2019
2. Department of Planning & Inspections Update
NEW APPLICATIONS - None
NEW BUSINESS
1. Review of Permits Referred to Commission
2. Annual Meeting of Historic District Commission
a. Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman
b. Meeting & Deadline Schedule for 2020
3. Certified Local Government (CLG) Program
a. Status of FFY2018 CLG Grant
b. Update on FFY2019 CLG Grant Application Submission
4. Project for Dover’s 2019 Comprehensive Plan
a. Release DRAFT Plan (dated 10/1/2019) is available for review. See Project website:
https://www.cityofdover.com/2019-comprehensive-plan
b. Release DRAFT Chapter 6 – Historic Preservation Plan and associated Maps 6-1A
and 6-1B
c. Update on Public Outreach Events held for 2019 Comprehensive Plan:
i. Open House Event – October 23, 2019
ii. Visitation Event – October 24, 2019
d. Update on Next Steps
i. PLUS Review Comments Received
ii. Preparation of FINAL DRAFT
iii. Formal Review Process and Public Hearings
ADJOURN
THE AGENDA ITEMS MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO
CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSION.
Agenda Posted: November 12, 2019
Page 2
CITY OF DOVER
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
September 19, 2019
The Regular Meeting of the City of Dover Historic District Commission was held on Thursday,
September 19, 2019 at 3:30 PM with Chairperson Mr. McDaniel presiding. Members present were
Mr. Street, Mr. Czerwinski, Mr. McDaniel and Ms. Mason. Ms. Horsey was absent.
Planning Office Staff members present were Mrs. Melson-Williams, and Mrs. Mullaney.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mr. Street moved for approval of the agenda and to move the New Business before
Communications and Reports, seconded by Mr. Czerwinski and the motion was unanimously
carried 4-0. Ms. Horsey was absent.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
MEETING OF JUNE 20, 2019
Mr. Czerwinski moved for approval of the meeting minutes of June 20, 2019, seconded by Mr.
Street and the motion was unanimously carried 4-0. Ms. Mason was absent.
ADOPTION OF SUMMARY MINUTES OF THE REGULAR HISTORIC DISTRICT
COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2019
Mr. Czerwinski moved for approval of the summary meeting minutes of August 15, 2019, seconded
by Mr. Street and the motion was unanimously carried 4-0. Ms. Horsey was absent.
NEW BUSINESS
Review of Permits Referred to Commission
HI-19-04 Referral of Fence Permit #19-1218 at 2 Kings Highway NE – Referral by the City Planner
to the Historic District Commission for Review of Architectural Review Certification for Fence
Permit application #19-1218 for fence replacement project. Project involves replacement of an
existing white wood fence (and chain-link fence) with five-foot metal picket fence along the Kings
Highway and Division Street frontages. The property is zoned R-10 (One-Family Residence Zone)
and is subject to the H (Historic District Overlay Zone). The property is located at the corner of
Kings Highway NE where Kings Highway and Division Street merge, south of the intersection with
Maple Lane. The owner of record is Samuel Ryan Halpern. Address: 2 Kings Highway NE. Tax
Parcel: ED-05-077.05-04-44.00-000. Council District 2. A previous Application HI-16-02 for
construction of Carriage House Building at this property was reviewed April 21, 2016.
Mrs. Melson-Williams gave a brief introduction of application HI-19-04 regarding the proposed
fence project and the Staff Report on the Permit requested.
Chairman McDaniel mentioned that as Chairman on the Murphey School Board he did not think
their property adjoins that property. Mrs. Melson-Williams replied it did not.
Representative(s): Mr. Ryan Halpern and Mrs. Stephany Halpern as property owners; and Mr.
Chris Volkomer, contractor.
Page 3
CITY OF DOVER HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 19, 2019
Mr. Halpern mentioned that he wanted to make clear that he is sensitive to the Historic District; he
lives in Dover and he did not want to do anything to cause any friction. He simply wants to make
something more pleasing. The chain-link fence is disgusting and has been disgusting. Now is the
time because we are redoing all the landscaping and have several projects on the house itself which
includes interior renovation and at the back of the house a complete landscape and redesign and
cleaning of the property. We are also removing old trees. We will now have a fence to view into the
property which will be something very nice to look at. The last phase of the house will be to replace
all the vinyl siding with some type of lap siding or hardie board to bring it back to and away from
the vinyl siding that is not part of the historic recommendation. He loves the white wood fence and it
looks great, but he cannot maintain it. It is constant maintenance. There are sections now that look
like it is going to fall, and he must do something different. There is true iron at the Governor’s
property that he thinks is cost prohibitive and that probably has further maintenance. Across the
street is Zimmerman’s old property currently has aluminum wrought iron. We are looking to keep
the five-foot fence height for a couple of reasons such as security and pets. The back of the property
has been done from a prior Permit. As he referred to the first picture that represented the back of the
property free landscaping, there is an example of the black fence. The aluminum wrought iron tends
to look cheap at times and that is the reason he was thinking to put up brick piers along the fence
line. He is sensitive to the recommendations from the Planning Commission (Staff). If we can put
them at the corner of the property or at the joining of the fences and minimize the amount of brick
pillars, he is willing to do that because it is cheaper for him. In the alley access behind the house
there is a weird triangle, and there have been many times he has almost hit a pedestrian coming out
of the area because he cannot see them nor can the pedestrian see him. He thought about a mirror
system, but that is not going to work. He would like to cut the corner and move the fence back to a
45-degree angle where the chain-link fence is located. He could put two brick pillars there and
joined it together with the black aluminum fence or a brick wall where we could put the addresses
and a planter or lantern. He is open for suggestions. The side entrance has been the bain of my
existence and have since secured it with screws. There are times children will open the fence and
leave it open as they are walking down the street. This is also the area where we found a squatter and
their belongings. He has since removed all the grass on the sidewalk near the chain-link fence and
slats. A sprinkler has been installed and he will be receiving sod next week. Besides the sidewalk,
the street will look much better as well. There will most likely be some type of fast vegetation such
as an Emerald Arbor or something that will allow privacy. He will temporarily put some type of
mesh for privacy behind it which will look nice until there are trees and coverage. There is also a
photo of the termite ridden 6x6 fence post. He stated that he saw a Recommendation from Planning
Staff to leave the pergola in place and put brick piers in front of it with a fence. He wants to figure
out a way to save it. The base is toast from terminate damage to the point that the fears for the
mailman every time he walks in. He is thinking that a good compromise is to take the top off
because it does match the front of the property and build two brick pillars. It would then rest on top
of the brick pillar system and it would maintain the top. Whether we would restore or rebuild, we
would do something. We would paint it white and have it rest on two of the brick columns as a base
system. He stated that he listed 8-foot brick pillars with a 7-foot sunburst top matching aluminum
gate that will be secured for the mailman. There will be some type of electric fence access. If the
Commission feels that this is a good compromise, whatever the current height is we will leave in
place and just build the new foundation made of brick. He mentioned that he showed the intersection
of the white picket fence with the adjacent Hall House fence which is a 4-foot black wrought iron
2
Page 4
CITY OF DOVER HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 19, 2019
fence. He believes if he breaks that up and puts a brick pillar it would be nice and look much better.
The adjacent property looks like aluminum, but he thinks it is a 4 ½ -foot fence. It does not appear to
be a 4-foot fence or a 5-foot fence.
Mr. Halpern was asked which property was he referencing? Mr. Halpern replied the Governor’s Café
(across the street).
Mr. Halpern also referenced another photo on the corner where the trash trucks also have a problem.
He stated that he also paid to have the electric buried in the alley. The only wires on the pole is the
cable TV wires (lines). He was not sure if the City had any dealing with Comcast which sometimes
can be difficult. We would like to propose without paying to have the pole relocated where the
telephone intercepts the home. The other property he also owns so there would be no permission that
would need to be granted. There are some renderings of the exact height, style of the gate that would
be at the front of the building and a brick pillar with a molded cornice with the dimensions. He stated
that coming out of the alley you cannot see from the left and he would like to bump it back. The City
Planning was leading towards Kings Highway and Division Street for that corner. He understands
the safety concerns. He took a picture of the angle where a driver would sit and the ability to view
down the street which is pretty good clearance. He thinks with the opening in the new aluminum
fence system you will gain even more visibility.
Mr. Street asked for clarification if the applicant was proposing 5-foot brick pillars and fencing. Mr.
Halpern replied that initially he was; but he is open to just the major intersection points verses every
so often. Mr. Street mentioned that he was okay so far. He just wanted to make sure that it was clear
on the request of the brick pillars, fencing, alleyway, and columns. He thinks that it is fine. The only
caution is regarding the corner and Division Street it is State street maintained by DelDOT. He
advised the applicant to obtain the necessary Permits.
Chairman McDaniel asked Mr. Street if he was referring to coming out of the alley or off the street.
Mr. Street replied that he was talking about any fence work that is being done on Division Street.
Mr. Halpern replied that Pierce Fencing Company did the work in the back yard.
Mr. Czerwinski mentioned that he did not have any questions, but he did have concerns regarding
the 5-foot height of the fence. The fact that no other properties have a 5-foot fence. The height of the
fence comes across as a high security presence. Historically, we did not have high fences like that.
The 4-foot fence with the spike top is enough for security. If you want to put the 5-foot across the
back which he believes is currently there. Mr. Halpern replied all if it is a 5-foot fence.
Mr. Czerwinski stated that he personally had an issue with the 5-foot fence. Aesthetically you have
this high fence that looks like it is meant to be high security. There are no other properties in the area
that actually that has a fence like that. He thinks that it is rather unappealing when you have a high
fence like that. He could be the only one feeling this way. There is a fence next to you which is the
Hall House and the fence across the street. There are fences in the whole area that are 3 to 4 foot-tall
and then there is your 5-foot fence which sticks out and does not historically match the area. When
you were along State Street, any wrought iron fence was 3 to 4-feet. Mr. Halpern asked Mr.
Czerwinski if he was referring to the existing 5-foot fence. Mr. Czerwinski stated that this was built
before the Ordinance was made regarding the 5-foot fence. Mr. Halpern asked Mr. Czerwinski if he
3
Page 5
CITY OF DOVER HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 19, 2019
felt it represents the same type of cosmetic appearance. Mr. Czerwinski replied yes. Mr. Czerwinski
mentioned that he understands the privacy and that there was a secondary fence built in the back.
From an aesthetic point of view when you are trying to present your house and you have a high
fence that it comes across rather odd to have a high fence that is purposeful built to block the view of
the house. Whoever lived there before, the high fence had the same sense that regarding privacy. He
thinks the fence was built in the 90’s before the requirements for the Architectural Review. Again,
he is personally against the 5-foot fence because it comes across as “offputting” and is not
historically accurate. If you are doing the spike fence, it is going to give you security. He stated that
he was cool with everything else (the pillars and he is happy with the design). He thinks it will be
very fitting for the area.
Mr. Volhomer asked when the existing 5-foot fence was actually built? Mr. Halpern replied in the
90’s. Mr. Volhomer mentioned that from an aesthetic point of view if it was a brand-new fence
sitting there, it would not look out of place with that house and it is a 5-foot fence.
Mr. Volhomer mentioned that the fence that is going to be installed now instead of having a 2 ½ inch
wide pickets they are ½ inch. Technically, with this fence you get an even better view of the house
verses the old fence where you have less view of the house. He thinks that you are going to end up
with a better view.
Mr. Czerwinski mentioned if you look at the area as a whole and you drive down the street and you
are going down Kings Highway you have 3-foot fences and then all of a sudden there is a 5-foot
fence going around the corner. It sets itself off and it is not within the purview. There is a reason
why they put the 4-foot fence limit in the Historic District because that is what was historically in the
neighborhood. The 5-foot fence does not work in the City, perhaps in the suburbs. When you have
something that tall in the City, it stands out.
Mr. Halpern asked a question regarding the height of the fence at the substation that is down the
street. He thinks is owned by the City and was not sure it was in the Historic District. Mr.
Czerwinski replied yes, it is about 10-feet tall and it was done because they did not want people
climbing the fence.
Ms. Mason stated that she did not have a problem with the 5-foot fence. She said that she thinks it is
attractive. As she looks at the other fences and aside from the color, she thinks it looks so much
better in the neighborhood. She thinks this existing fence does stick out. She mentioned that she
walks all over Dover daily and as she walks by the house located at 2 Kings Highway, she would
always say I really cannot peak into this house to get a better look. She suggested maybe there could
be a compromise. You have the spike; the spikes can be very dangerous. Mr. Czerwinski mentioned
that the spikes are part of the design.
Mr. Halpern mentioned that he was open, there are other designs and points.
Ms. Mason mentioned that the fence is also to keep the dogs inside the yard.
Mr. Halpern mentioned that the fence itself it double picketed which means they are closer together
to prevent the smaller dogs from getting through.
4
Page 6
CITY OF DOVER HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 19, 2019
Ms. Halpern mentioned that it will also prevent a lot of trash from being thrown over into their yard
which is currently happening.
Mr. Czerwinski asked what the overall height of the fence was. Mr. Halpern replied that the
connecting joints were right at 5-feet. The actual 6x6 that is currently there is higher.
Chairman McDaniel mentioned that the new 5-foot fence was just replacing the existing fence and it
will be better and easier to see through.
4:02 (58) Mr. McDaniel asked about the gate opening on Division Street (showing an image of the
existing). Mr. Halpern replied that he would like to break the joint up with maybe a wider brick
column or brick pillars and separating it by fence. He does not want to have a gate on that side.
Chairman McDaniel mentioned that he did not like the idea of the brick wall with lettering or
something with letters on it. He was not sure if the applicant was trying to appease the City or the
Historic District Commission, but he did not like the idea of the lettering.
Mr. Czerwinski asked if that was a request or was that something that was just brought up at the
meeting. Mr. McDaniel replied no, it was not a request.
Mr. Halpern mentioned that the reason he did not invest a lot of money in actual designs is because
he knew there would need to be changes. He was presenting ideas that he had and was looking for
some feedback. Mr. McDaniel said he understood, and overall, he liked the designs. He mentioned
that they were a little fuzzy on how many brick pillars there will be, where they will be located, and
how big they are and if you are changing things around regarding the entrance way. Overall, as he
previously mentioned he likes this design and concept. He can see what the applicant is trying to do
and thinks that he is doing a good job. He is very ambivalent about the Kings Highway corner and
setting the fence back as suggested by Staff. He could not help but think that you will be able to see
better around the corner than you can now. The way the street is angled now because he comes down
that street all the time and he always turns right. He does not have to worry about trying to cross
over at the other side. He knows that in previous hearings the Commission has worried about
corners, but that corner seems to be an easier one to see around.
Mr. Halpern mentioned that he could amend his application for the brick columns. Now, if he could
try to visualize all the columns, he realizes that the brick pillars can change the appearance of the
house even by doing it at the corner or intersections of the fences. This will enrich the look without
just putting up a straight black fence.
Mr. Street suggested lowering the number of 5-foot pillars to 3 or 4 pillars to the transition. Whether
you put 3 or 4 columns along that road you will still have a problem with at least ½ - to one dozen
brick pillars on Kings Highway and Division Street.
Mrs. Melson-Williams gave a brief overview of Staff Findings from the Review of the Building
Permit. She suggested another option for the entrance pergola is that it has some depth to it so she is
not sure how they would set it on brick piers. It may be better to, in that case, give it new posts that
come down and that may be an easier fix if that is where the termite problem is happening.
5
Page 7
CITY OF DOVER HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 19, 2019
Mr. Halpern asked if 19 ½ inches was the suggested and if that was based on the construction
number width of the pier system and how the bricks line up. He mentioned that 22 inches is the next
size of a pier system that they can do.
Mr. Volhomer mentioned that one of the entrances was deeper because the fence is out closer to the
road. The fence turns at a 90-degree angle and goes in about 3-feet and then you have the structure.
The structure is only about 2-feet deep.
Mrs. Melson-Williams mentioned that Staff was suggesting that the structure become a free-standing
element once you pass through your gate or fence line. Then it is something you walk under enroute
to the house.
Mr. Street asked when the arched gate entry was constructed. Mr. McDaniel replied we don’t know,
but he is glad to see the fence go.
Mr. Street wanted to know how they could dictate saving the pergola if it was built in the 1990’s. He
mentioned that it is a nice piece; he likes it. If you could do something to compliment it or keep it,
but at the same time they are trying to replace a fence that needs some work and help.
Ms. Mason mentioned that she thinks they should keep the pergola because it is part of the original
design of the house.
Chairman McDaniel mentioned that he did not think they should keep the pergola because it was
constructed with pressure treated wood.
Mr. Halpern mentioned that he has a picture and it was not a fence system. It was just shrubbery all
over the place for that house. What makes the fence so hard to maintain is having to go to the Amish
and get them to hand make it and then replace it.
Mr. Street recommended approval of application HI-19-04 with the Staff Findings of the
Architectural Review Certification for the replacement of the existing fence materials, brick piers,
corner visibility on Kings Highway; and the applicant can choose to keep the existing wood pergola
feature; and the applicant can choose to retain or not retain the existing arched (side) gate entry. The
motion was seconded by Ms. Mason and unanimously carried 4-0. Ms. Horsey was absent.
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that as a follow up Planning Staff will prepare a written decision and
with that we can complete the review of the Permit. The Permit will reflect where you have options
to make the choices regarding the pergola and the gate section. If there are any drawings that will
reflect how it is going to work out to be, then Planning Staff can amend that information into the
Permit.
Mr. Volhomer asked if they could make the 45 into the alley (45 turn of the fence at the alley
intersection with Division Street)? Mrs. Melson-Williams replied yes, that is not a problem.
6
Page 8
CITY OF DOVER HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 19, 2019
COMMUNICATIONS & REPORTS
Summary of Applications for 2018 and 2019
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that there have not been any changes other than this application HI-
19-04 as the fourth application for this year.
Summary of Architectural Review Certifications for 2019
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that with the Summary of Applications there were 18 applications.
There was only one that had Historic District Commission interaction and that was the one
associated with the Governor’s Café at 144 Kings Hwy SW. The Building Permit was issued but
she is not sure if the work has started. She thinks they had a meeting regarding their ABC license
that they had to pursue because of the expansion of the kitchen. Majority of the Permits through
the end of August consist of interior renovations, exterior renovations, roof and Demolition
Permits and signage.
Chairman McDaniel mentioned that Delaware State University applied for a Sign Permit for the
Parsonage Building and asked if they purchased the building. Mrs. Melson-Williams replied that
the building was a gift. She was not sure how they plan to use the building.
Ms. Mason mentioned that the Doggy Daycare is now a tattoo parlor (property at S. Governors
Avenue).
Department of Planning & Inspections Update
Mrs. Melson-Williams mentioned that there was no update. The Planning Office is still down one
Planner.
Update on August 15, 2019 Presentation on Small-Cell Wireless Installations (HI-19-03)
Mrs. Melson-Williams mentioned that a copy of the Power Point presentation was provided for
information in your packet that Mr. Robinson, Electric Director gave out at the last meeting. There
is no way to make the stuff historic, but there are ways to minimize the potential impact.
Mr. Czerwinski asked how many towers were going to be downtown. Mrs. Melson-Williams
replied that it depends on the multiple carriers potentially involved and the technology is much
shorter of a distance that they have to be spaced.
Certified Local Government (CLG) Program
Status of FFY2018 CLG Grant
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that there is one of the latest progress reports related to the
Comprehensive Plan Chapter. On June 20, 2019 there was the Historic District Workshop Event.
The handouts from the event is available.
Update on FFY2019 CLG Grant Application Submission
The grant focus will be to hire a consultant to work on the Design Standards and Guidelines. We
have not heard anything at the current time regarding the Grant Agreement.
Office received the Grant Application for FFY2019 that will start July 1, 2019.
7
Page 9
CITY OF DOVER HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 19, 2019
Chairman McDaniel asked if Mrs. Melson-Williams would hear something within the next
month. Mrs. Melson-Williams replied she hoped so.
Chairman McDaniel asked if we are going to hire a consultant to do the update of the Design
Standards and Guidelines. Mrs. Melson-Williams replied yes.
Mr. Street asked what was the timeframe on the Grant? Mrs. Melson-Williams replied that the
Grant is typically a July-June timeframe which is different than the Federal Fiscal Year that
starts on October 1. She was not sure how it plays out if you have not started yet. There are ways
they can extend the June 30th end date on the backend.
Mr. Czerwinski asked if the Grants had to be bid on? Mrs. Melson-Williams replied from the
City’s procurement side of the rules you have to follow; it depends on what the total cost is. We
are under $25,000 so that gives us a little bit more of flexibility on how we can go out and seek
consultant services. This will probably not be your typical Request for Proposal because it is
very specialized. We have had work done previously on the Request for Proposal. There are
firms out there that are qualified.
Ms. Mason asked if $5000 was the total of the Grant? Mrs. Melson-Williams replied that it was
more than that. It is a Grant and match scenario. The Grant is $9200 and the required City match
is $6100. We actually have more than the required match on the City side which is $10,000 in
the Budget.
Project for Dover’s 2019 Comprehensive Plan
Update on Project Activities
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that the Comprehensive Plan is required every ten years. A Project
Update through September was handed out to all members present at the meeting. In the past few
months, Staff has been working on intense text writing and map development. In mid-August,
we issued internally a Staff Draft #1where Staff compiled all the chapters that different
individuals were writing into one document so that we could read through the entire thing and
share it with the City’s Department Head. We are in the process of taking all the feedback from
amongst the City Planning Staff as well as several Department Heads. We do expect to hear from
the City Manager tomorrow. The next key deadline is October 1, 2019. We need to submit a
draft of the Comprehensive Plan and the Maps to the State for the Plus Review process. We will
also be using the October 1, 2019 deadline to release the draft to the public in its entirety. We are
planning two Open House Events which will be held on October 23, 2019 and a visitation day at
City Hall on October 24, 2019. Once we have the Plus Review comments then we will have to
go back into the plan and make any necessary changes and then we will be back into the formal
Public Hearing process that has to occur with the Planning Commission and City Council. That
is shaping up into a December or January timeframe. The Plan includes short- and long-term
future implementation and goals. This also includes the Historic Preservation section. The
Design Standards and Guideline is a short term. We will also be updating the website on the
Comprehensive Plan. Mrs. Melson-Williams asked the members of the Historic District
Commission to review Chapter 15 of the Draft Comprehensive Plan and if there are any
questions or concerns please reach out to her. Staff will be doing an update and Plan
8
Page 10
CITY OF DOVER HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 19, 2019
Implementation Chapter to City Council at their Council Committee of the Whole on September
24, 2019. They have previously seen the Goals and Recommendations. Planning Commission
was updated earlier this week and we will be doing a more formalized presentation of the draft in
October.
Mr. Street moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Ms. Mason and unanimously carried 4-0.
Meeting adjourned at 4:45 PM
Sincerely,
Maretta Savage-Purnell
Secretary
9
Page 11
Summary of Permit Applications with Architectural Review Certification
2019 - Updated Thru 10-31-2019
DATE PERMIT # LOCATION TYPE ACTION ON ARCHITECTURAL NOTES
REVIEW CERTIFICATE
1/7/2019 18-2072 144 Kings Hwy SW, Building Permit - Building HDC Approval with Conditions on Construction of Kitchen Addition on
Governors Café Addition ARC 12/21/07: Application HI-17-04: west elevation. Project also subject
Staff Approval per ARC to Conditional Use C-18-01. Permit
issued.
2/11/2019 18-2115 201 W. Loockerman St. Building Permit - Interior Staff Approval. No ArchRevCert Interior renovations for café.
Renovation required for interior work. Project has a separate permit for
exterior work.
2/14/2019 19-131 108 E. Water St, Offices Building Permit - Interior and Staff Approval of ramp. No Interior renovations of office
Exterior Renovations ArchRevCert required for interior spaces; exterior work to
work. reconstruction portions of rear
accessibility ramp.
2/19/2019 19-159 401 Federal St, Townsend Roof Permit Not reviewed by Planning Staff. Roof replacement project with
Building Issued by Administrative Staff after similar/in-kind roof shingle
Building Code Review. materials.
2/25/2019 19-207 145 S. New St Demolition Permit - Interior Staff Approval for interior selective Interior demolition only. Project to
demolition. convert building to apartment units
is subject to a separate permit.
3/14/2019 19-94 306 S. State St., Law Offices Building Permit - Interior and Staff Approval. No ArchRevCert Interior renovations for offices.
Exterior Renovations required for interior work. Exterior work to improve access at
side rear entry door and rear fire
escape on south elevation.
4/29/2019 18-1927 145 S. New St Building Permit - Interior and Staff Approval. Interior renovations to fit-out for
Exterior Renovations four apartment units. Some exterior
changes related to windows and
doors. Staff worked with applicant
to bring project activities into
compliance with DS&G.
4/8/2019 19-354 54 S. State St, Presbyterian Temporary Sign Permit Staff Approval. Installation of vinyl banner from
Church of Dover 4/8/2019 to 4/22/2019.
Page 12
Summary of Permit Applications with Architectural Review Certification
2019 - Updated Thru 10-31-2019
DATE PERMIT # LOCATION TYPE ACTION ON ARCHITECTURAL NOTES
REVIEW CERTIFICATE
4/1/2019 19-387 305 W. Loockerman St., Sign Permit Staff Approval. Installation of window sign for new
Sold Out Sneakers (Retail retail store.
Store)
5/1/2019 18-2009 120 S. Governors Avenue, Building Permit Staff Approval. Pavilion structure in playground
Kent County Community area of Day Care Center. Limited
Action Agency visibility.
5/6/2019 19-653 203 S. State Street, Sign Permit Staff Approval Reface sign panel in existing
Delaware State University decorative pole sign at northwest
Foundation corner of building.
6/13/2019 18-767 Near 401 Federal St, Building Permit Staff Approval Replacement of Bus Shelter at
Townsend Building corner of Loockerman Plaza and
Federal Street.
7/12/2019 19-888 2 Kings Hwy, NE Fence Permit Staff Approval Replacement of fence across
interior of yard and fencing along
alley of property with metal picket
style fence.
7/10/2019 19-928 111 W. Loockerman St. at Temporary Sign Permit Staff Approval Installation of temporary sign on
rear, Duck Creek Printing east wall face from 7/10/2019 to
10/10/2019.
7/22/2019 19-987 420 S. State Street Window Permit Not reviewed by Planning Staff. Window replacement.
Issued by Administrative Staff only.
8/26/2019 19-938 523 S. State Street, Christ Building Permit Staff Approval. Placement of accessory structure
Church (shed) at north edge of large
parking lot.
8/8/2019 19-967 401 Federal St, Townsend Building Permit - Interior Staff Approval. No ArchRevCert Interior Renovations for office
Building Renovations required for interior work. space.
8/16/2019 19-1132 10 Kings Hwy, NE Roof Permit Staff Approval. Repair and replacement of rolled
roofing on rear of house.
10/23/2019 19-1218 2 Kings Hwy, NE Fence Permit HDC Consultation on ArchRevCert on Replacement of existing wood and
9/19/2019; Staff Approval per ARC chain-link fencing with new metal
picket fence. HI-19-04
Page 13
Summary of Permit Applications with Architectural Review Certification
2019 - Updated Thru 10-31-2019
DATE PERMIT # LOCATION TYPE ACTION ON ARCHITECTURAL NOTES
REVIEW CERTIFICATE
10/4/2019 19-1294 126 W Loockerman Street, Administrative Building Permit -HDC/PC Approval with Conditions on Site Work prep and utility work
Loockerman Way Site Work ARC 9/19/2016: Application HI-16- prior to building construction start.
05: Staff Approval per ARC Master Plan S-16-18, Site Plan S-19-
21 for two mixed use
(commercial/office) buildings
10/8/2019 19-1301 151-181 Kings Hwy SW, Administrative Building Permit -Staff Approval. Brick repair and repointing on
Woodburn Exterior Renovations chimneys.
10/8/2019 19-1302 304 S Governors Avenue, Administrative Building Permit -Staff Approval. Brick repair and replacement, brick
Reith Hall Exterior Renovations repointing of exterior walls (select
areas).
10/21/2019 19-1420 304 S State Street Demolition Permit - Selective Staff Approval - due to emergency Selective Demolition (removal of
case. exterior wall) for stabilization of
front façade following exterior brick
veneer surface fell from 2nd/3rd
floor area.
Page 14
City of Dover Historic District Commission
Summary of Applications 2018
Updated thru October 31, 2019
FILE# PLAN NAME LOCATION TYPE ACTION STATUS
HI-18-01 CLG Grant Certified Local Information File Notice of Eligibility for Grant Grant Application received; awaiting Formal
Application for Government 3/15/2018; FFY2018 CLG Grant Award Letter and Letter of Agreement;
FFY2018 Application for Grant Application submitted 5/11/2018 to Grant Timeframe to be 7/1/18-6/30/19
Funding SHPO
HI-18-02 Referral of 12 Kings Highway Demolition Permit - Permit #18-1104 referred to HDC by Permit Application received 6/25/2018;
Demolition NE, Elizabeth W. Accessory Structure City Planner 7/5/2018 for consultation Additional Information received 7/9/2018
Permit #18-1104 Murphey School on Architectural Review Certification; enabled ArchRevCert to be granted: Permit
Accessory Applicant provided additional issued 7/10/2018; Update on Status to HDC
Structure information to Planner; Planner issued on 7/19/2018; Structure Demolished
ArchRevCert 7/10/2018
HI-18-03 Referral of Fence 401 South Governors Fence Permit Permit #18-1207 referred to HDC by Permit application received 7/13/2018;
Permit #18-1207 Avenue City Planner 7/18/2018 for HDC authorizes fence height and
consultation on Architectural Review recommends materials; Permit to be issued
Certification; Considered at 7/19/2018 subject to conditions of Architectural
HDC Meeting - approval granted for 6 Review Certification. No activity for this
ft. height with recommendations on potential user.
fence material
Page 15
City of Dover Historic District Commission
Summary of Applications 2019
Updated thru October 31, 2019
FILE# PLAN NAME LOCATION TYPE ACTION STATUS
HI-19-01 Information on Downtown Dover; Presentation Informational Presentation and Information heard on grant funded Mural
Downtown Dover Potential Mural Consultation on Wall Preparation for S. project from Design Committee of
Mural Project Location at 109-113 Bradford St. elevation - HDC Downtown Dover Partnership; Property
W. Loockerman recommendation to not allow painting Owner to be advised that masonry wall
Street of an existing masonry wall should not be painted
HI-19-02 CLG Grant Certified Local Information File Notice of Eligibility for Grant Grant Application submitted; awaiting
Application for Government 6/14/2019; FFY2019 CLG Grant Formal Award Letter and Letter of
FFY2019 Application for Grant Application submitted 7/11/2019 to Agreement; Grant Timeframe Summer
Funding SHPO 2019-6/30/2019
HI-19-03 Information on Historic District and Information File Informational Presentation by City's Ongoing efforts to establish provisions for
Small-Cell Citywide Electric Director to HDC design, permitting, and implementation
Wireless Facilities
HI-19-04 Referral of Fence 2 Kings Highway NE Fence Permit Permit #19-1218 referred to HDC by Permit application received 9/4/2019; HDC
Permit #19-1218 City Planner 9/9/2019 for consultation authorizes fence height and recommended
on Architectural Review Certification; elements, materials, & location; Permit
Considered at 9/19/2019 HDC Meeting issued 10/23/2019 subject to conditions of
- approval granted for 5 ft. metal Architectural Review Certification.
picket fence with recommendations
on brick piers, pergola, and fence
materials & location
Page 16
CITY OF DOVER
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION DRAFT 11-5-2019
DRAFT Schedule of application deadlines and Historic District Commission meeting dates for
the year of 2020. The submittal procedures for the Historic District Commission are outlined in
Zoning Ordinance, Article 10, Section 3.2. Prior to application submission a Pre-Application
Meeting with Planning Staff is required.
MONTH DEADLINE DATE MEETING DATE
JANUARY 12/13/2019 01/16/2020
FEBRUARY 01/17/2020 02/20/2020
MARCH 02/14/2020 03/19/2020
APRIL 03/13/2020 04/16/2020
MAY 04/17/2020 05/21/2020
JUNE 05/15/2020 06/18/2020
JULY 06/12/2020 07/16/2020
AUGUST 07/17/2020 08/20/2020
SEPTEMBER 08/14/2020 09/17/2020
OCTOBER 09/11/2020 10/15/2020
NOVEMBER 10/16/2020 11/19/2020
DECEMBER 11/13/2020 12/17/2020
JANUARY 12/18/2020 01/21/2021
For Information Contact: City of Dover
Department of Planning & Inspections
15 Loockerman Plaza
P.O. Box 475
Dover, DE 19903
(302) 736-7196
(302) 736-4217 Fax
www.cityofdover.com
Page 17
Project for Dover’s 2019 Comprehensive Plan
Update for November 21, 2019 Historic District Commission Meeting
• Release DRAFT Plan (dated 10/1/2019)
o The Release DRAFT Plan was submitted to PLUS
(Preliminary Land Use Services) Review process on October
1, 2019. Planning Staff participated in the PLUS Review
Meeting on October 23rd.
o The Release DRAFT Plan is posted on the City’s Website on
the 2019 Comprehensive Plan Webpage.
o See the 2019 Comprehensive Plan Webpage for project
information and the links for documents and maps issued.
▪ https://www.cityofdover.com/2019-comprehensive-plan
• Update on Public Outreach Events held for 2019 Comprehensive Plan:
▪ Open House Event – October 23, 2019
▪ Visitation Event – October 24, 2019
• Update on Next Steps
o The PLUS Review Comments were received on November 8,
2019. Planning Staff is reviewing these comments for action.
o Formal Review Process and Public Hearings:
▪ A Final DRAFT Plan (document and maps) will be
prepared and issued.
▪ A summary of any specific Requests/Comments to the
DRAFT Plan will be compiled for review.
▪ Formal Review and Public Hearings to be scheduled:
• Planning Commission – December 16, 2019
• City Council – in January 2020
Page 18
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
Release DRAFT #1- 10.1.2019
Chapter 6
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN
HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF DOVER
The founding and development of the City begins in the seventeenth century with William Penn’s
order to layout the Town of Dover in 1683 and is later realized by plat in 1717. Many residents of
the Dover area played key roles in the development and formation of the City of Dover, State of
Delaware, and even the United States of America. These people range from Caesar Rodney as a
signer of the Declaration of Independence to members of the Ridgely family like Mabel Lloyd
Ridgely as a Suffragist and preservationist. Although the City traces its roots over three hundred
years, the City of Dover is known for its exemplification of a late-nineteenth century townscape.
Dover’s first modern development “boom” began immediately after the end of the Civil War when
commercial growth was spurred primarily by the extension of railroad services to the City,
connecting the Dover area’s agricultural products to large urban markets to the north and west.
The Green and then the downtown core area of Loockerman Street were the significant commercial
and cultural districts. Development of the City continued in the twentieth century with residential,
commercial, and major industrial areas extending out from the core. Residential development
expanded the downtown street grid to the north and south. Post-World War II residential
subdivisions developed surrounding the City’s core and continued into the mid-to-late twentieth
century to provide housing for the workforce of the new industries like Playtex and Dover Air
Force Base. The development then focused on auto-oriented commercial development along Route
13 (DuPont Highway), Bay Road, and Forrest Avenue (Route 8) corridors.
A majority of the historic resources in Dover are centered around and to the north of The Green.
The development of this historic area has been categorized into three distinct phases of growth.
Identified by their historical incorporation of developed areas into the City during the period from
the Civil War until the late 1920s, the dates assigned to these growth periods are 1868, 1885, and
1929. The 1868 City limits were bounded by Water Street on the south, Division Street on the
north, West Street and the railroad on the west, and King’s Highway on the east. In 1885, the City
stretched northward as far as Clara Street and the 1929 limits reached Ross Street to the north and
South Street to the south. Neither the 1885 expansion nor the 1929 expansion significantly added
developed areas to the east or west of the original boundaries. The combined area covers the
historic core of the City of Dover.
However, the City continued to grow extending into previous agricultural areas surrounding the
City. This brought additional urban/suburban development and annexation of the areas into the
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019 Page 6 - 1
Page 19
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
City. Auto-oriented commercial development occurred along major road corridors and residential
development focused on subdivisions of the mid-to late twentieth century. Some of these areas
contain potential historic resources as development (buildings) reach the 50-year age mark.
IDENTIFICATION OF HISTORIC RESOURCES
Delaware Cultural Resource Survey
The formal identification of historic resources begins with Cultural Resource Surveys according
to the criteria and standards set by the Delaware State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO),
Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs. This is a systematic inventory of Delaware’s buildings,
structures, sites, and objects over fifty (50) years old. Each property is assigned a Cultural Resource
Survey (CRS) number. The public CRS (Cultural Resource Survey) information is accessible
through CHRIS (Cultural and Historic Resource Information System). Government agencies,
consultants, and SHPO staff supply this survey information by conducting projects, reviews, and
grant-funded surveys. Within the City of Dover, the core Downtown area and some of the adjacent
residential areas were subject to Cultural Resource Surveys completed in the 1980s. Additional
historic resources have been surveyed as part of road development projects in other areas of the
City. It is important to note that not all areas of the City have been subject to this survey, especially
areas of early-to-mid twentieth century development. There is an ongoing need for updated survey
information in order to address gaps in previous survey and items of out-of-date information.
Information from the Delaware CRS can be used for local planning initiatives and the
determination of local priorities for identification, evaluation, registration, and treatment of
historic resources. The CRS information can be updated to record significant changes, including
demolition, that have occurred to a historic resource overtime. The City can be an active
participant to provide updated CRS information. There is a need for further survey work such as
survey of early to mid-twentieth century resources within the City.
Further the evaluation and registration of historic resources may lead to specific types of
designation including recognition of individual properties and historic districts. There are two
types of historic districts established in the City of Dover: the federally designated historic districts
listed in the National Register of Historic Places and a local Historic District Zone. The boundaries
of the local Historic District Zone overlap portions of two of the National Register listed historic
districts. The locations of each of the districts are shown on Maps 6-1A and 6-1B and are described
as follows.
National Register of Historic Places
Listing properties in the National Register of Historic Places is governed by a program established
by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. These properties are given
protection when potentially impacted by federal actions. Further, the listed properties may be
eligible to apply for the Federal and/or State Historic Preservation Tax Incentives program for
certified rehabilitations. Other grants and incentives may also be available for these properties.
The designation as a National Register Historic District does not impose land use or structure
design restrictions on the property owners within the district boundaries. Most of the benefit to
those properties within the National Register of Historic Places comes in the form of pride,
Page 6 - 2 –Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Page 20
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
recognition, and local awareness. In Dover, there are three Historic Districts listed in the National
Register of Historic Places. See Maps 6-1A and 6-1B for locations of National Register Historic
Districts.
National Register of Historic Places: Dover Green Historic District
The Dover Green Historic District (K00394) encompasses the area of earliest development in
Dover. It is bordered on the north by North Street, on the south by South Street, on the east by
Federal Street, and on the west by South Governors Avenue. The Dover Green Historic District
was established to recognize the historic importance of the area during the City’s development in
the eighteenth century. The district includes a range of building types from residences and offices
to governmental and church buildings. The key feature of this district is the park known as The
Green. The Green is now part of the First State National Historical Park.
National Register of Historic Places: Victorian Dover Historic District
The Victorian Dover Historic District (K00396) includes the historic areas north of The Green
surrounding both Governors Avenue and State Street. The district stretches as far north as Mary
Street and Walker Road, and is bounded on the south by North Street, on the east by the St. Jones
River, and on the west by North West Street and the areas of New Street and North Governors
Avenue. The Victorian Dover Historic District was established to recognize a portion of the
historic development of Dover during the nineteenth century and post-Civil War period. It includes
residential and commercial areas.
National Register of Historic Places: Little Creek Hundred Rural Historic District
The Little Creek Hundred Rural Historic District (K-5686) includes an agricultural landscape
located east of Dover and northwest of the town of Little Creek. A portion of this historic district
on the west side of Long Point Road lies within the City of Dover boundaries.
Table 6-1: Properties Listed in the National Register of Historic Places
CRS# Property Name
DE00104 First Broiler House (relocated to DE Agricultural Museum & Village)
K00104 Bradford-Loockerman House
K00106 Christ Church
K00107 Delaware State Museum Buildings
K00110 Governor’s House (Woodburn)
K00112 Loockerman Hall
K00115 Old State House
K00125 Eden Hill
K00126 Greenwold
K00347 John Bullen House
K00486 Hughes-Willis Site
K06396 Palmer House
Source: Delaware State Historic Preservation Office
National Register of Historic Places: Individual Properties
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019 Page 6 - 3
Page 21
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
A number of individual properties within the City of Dover are listed in the National Register of
Historic Places. These properties include residences, governmental buildings, churches, and
archaeological sites. The Table 6-1 above identifies these properties. See also Maps 6-1A and 6-
1B for general locations of properties individually listed in the National Register.
Dover Local Historic District Zone
Dover’s local Historic District Zone was established by a set of local ordinances under state
enabling legislation. The local Historic District Zone functions as an overlay zone. The provisions
for the Historic District Zone (H) are outlined in Article 3 §21 of the Zoning Ordinance and its
area is depicted on the City’s official Zoning Map. The Historic District Zone was created in order
to preserve the historic character of an individual historic resource or a district as a whole. The
local Historic District Zone is a positive force in the active preservation activities regarding
Dover’s historic resources
Established in 1961, the local Historic District Zone encompasses those historic areas of Dover
whose design and environment are essential parts of the historic character of the City. The Historic
District Commission was formally established in 1993 and the Design Standards and Guidelines
for the City of Dover Historic District Zone were adopted. In 1997, the local Historic District Zone
was expanded to encompass the properties fronting on Loockerman Street from State Street to
Forest Street. The local Historic District Zone (H) is approximately bounded on the north by Reed
and Fulton Streets, on the south by North and South Streets, on the east by the St. Jones River, and
on the west by North West Street. See Maps 6-1A and 6-1B.
Within the Dover Historic District Zone, proposals for specific types of construction activities such
as new construction, additions to existing buildings, exterior renovations, and demolition of
buildings are subject to a design review process known as Architectural Review Certification. As
stated in the Design Standards and Guidelines for the City of Dover Historic District Zone, an
Architectural Review Certificate will be granted for the project “if it is found that the architectural
style, general design, height, bulk and setbacks, arrangement location and materials affecting the
exterior appearance are generally in harmony with neighboring structures and complementary to
the traditional architectural standards of the historic district.” Thus, proposals are reviewed for
conformity with the design criteria and development guidelines found in the Design Standards and
Guidelines of the City of Dover Historic District Zone.
For Architectural Review Certification, the Staff reviews of certain types of the projects such as
signage, fences, and minor exterior improvements through the Building Permit process. Historic
District Commission reviews specific types of construction projects and demolition requests in
order to grant the Architectural Review Certificate to the project. In instances such as Site
Development Plans where the proposed project also requires Planning Commission review, the
Historic District Commission makes a recommendation on the Architectural Review Certificate
which is forwarded to the Planning Commission. See Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 Section 3).
Page 6 - 4 –Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Page 22
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
HISTORIC PRESERVATION: DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY AND HISTORIC
RESOURCES
The growth and development activity in the City is faced with the challenge of balancing
preservation as related to building, history, and culture with the development activity of a modern
society. Certain types of development activity on properties within the designated local Historic
District Zone (H) are subject to a design review process known as the Architectural Review
Certification. This design review process is part of the regulatory authority established in the
Zoning Ordinance. The earliest land use codes of the City dating to the 1960’s recognized the
special character of the oldest sections of the City and sought to protect it.
Most of the regulations associated with the preservation and/or protection of historic resources
focus on consideration of an area’s character. The character of an area includes elements like
architectural style, building form, siting and placement, presentation of the streetscape, and
landscaping. The concept of land use focuses more on the location of the development and the type
of uses that occur together or in close proximity. Also, the elements of density, lot coverage (paved
versus open land), infrastructure, a mix of uses, a diversity of uses, open space, and public space
are related to land use. The choices made related to these character elements and land use have an
economic impact ranging from jobs created/retained to construction costs, income, wealth,
taxation, housing affordability, quality of life, and tourism opportunities.
Development activity within the area of the Historic District and even other areas of the City has
the potential to impact historic resources. Within the current City boundaries, development activity
may range from the adaptive re-use of an existing building to infill of a vacant property to the
development of a large tract of land. Also, as the City continues to annex land, the consideration
of the historical importance of these lands may need to focus on historic resources such as
agricultural landscapes (and buildings), archaeology, and even early to mid-twentieth century
buildings.
With the existing regulations and current design review process in the City of Dover’s Historic
District Zone, several concerns have been expressed including how to clarify the process, how to
encourage reuse of existing buildings, how to encourage appropriate architecture for new buildings
on infill sites, the interaction with Downtown revitalization efforts, and material selection.
Contemporary planning concepts assist with preservation efforts. An emphasis on
neighborhood/area planning can address character, the importance of building form, and urban
design principles as key concepts. Other approaches include new standards for construction and
rehabilitation, a focus on smarter growth by mixing uses, sustainability, utilization of existing
infrastructure, various approaches to affordable housing, and form-based codes.
Another issue that has arisen in recent years relating to revitalization and redevelopment of
Loockerman Street is the role of the Historic District Zone (H) on Loockerman Street. The need
to revisit the Design Standards and Guidelines of the City of Dover Historic District Zone, and
specifically to address how the guidelines apply to special areas and approaches to modern
materials and technology. Historic District Commission members, other elected officials, and
some members of the public have expressed a concern that Historic Preservation should play a
more prominent role in the area encompassing and immediately surrounding The Green than along
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019 Page 6 - 5
Page 23
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
the Loockerman Street commercial corridor. Comments noted that the standards and guidelines
should appropriately differentiate between the two areas. Some feedback received indicated that
the Loockerman Street corridor should be removed from the Historic District Zone (H) entirely.
However, to preserve the overall character of the area, differing treatment within the Guidelines is
a more appropriate approach to this issue.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION: PROGRAMS AND GROUPS
Several entities are involved in the preservation of historic and cultural resources in the City of
Dover. These include local, state and federal governmental agencies as well as private and not-for-
profit organizations. Some of the major agencies and organizations are identified and described
below.
Dover Historic District Commission
The Historic District Commission was established in 1993 by the Zoning Ordinance (Article 10
§3) to create and maintain district zone guidelines and review proposed developments and projects
within the local Historic District Zone. The Historic District Commission consists of five
appointed City residents who have “a special interest, experience or knowledge in history,
architecture, or historic preservation” with other qualifications related to profession, District
residents, or business representatives. The types of projects reviewed for Architectural Review
Certification range from exterior renovations to new development projects for multi-story
buildings. In the period from 1998-2018, the Historic District Commission reviewed sixty-three
(63) applications. Some of the large projects include the Dover Public Library, Loockerman Way
Plaza and North Street Improvements. Other projects reviewed include a variety of parking lots,
smaller building additions, signage, and building renovation projects. In addition, the Commission
advises City officials on all matters regarding historic preservation in the City and acts as a local
government liaison when meeting with outside officials about historic preservation matters.
State Agencies
The Delaware Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs focuses on historic resources through
historical research, stewardship, management of historic properties, interpretation, and public
education. The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) is a part of this state agency which
conducts statewide and local historic preservation activities. The SHPO provides informational
assistance to property owners and local governments pursuing preservation activities. The SHPO
also manages the Certified Local Government (CLG) and Historic Preservation Tax Credit
programs and reviews federally assisted projects for their effects on historic properties. In addition,
the SHPO facilitates nominations of properties to the National Register of Historic Places and
maintains information about surveyed cultural resources statewide. As part of their goals to
provide information on historic resources, they maintain CHRIS (Cultural and Historic Resource
Information System), a web-based interactive map. The agency also just completed Delaware’s
Historic Preservation Plan 2018-2022 entitled Partners in Preservation: Planning for the Future.
The Office of State Planning Coordination recognizes preservation as a component of the planning
process associated with land use planning, conservation, economic growth, and redevelopment
Page 6 - 6 –Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Page 24
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
activities. Its involvement includes the Preliminary Land Use Services (PLUS) review process and
the Downtown Development District program.
Several other state agencies contribute to preservation efforts by supporting local community
redevelopment initiatives. The Delaware Office of Management and Budget provides monetary
and informational assistance. The Division of Facilities Management, within the department,
manages a number of state-owned historic buildings within Dover. The Delaware Department of
Transportation (DelDOT) administers recognition programs and grant funding opportunities, such
as the Delaware Scenic and Historic Highways program and Transportation Enhancement
program. The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC),
in addition to having offices within adaptively used historic buildings, plays a role in park
programming, in conservation programs associated with the St. Jones River adjacent to
Downtown, and other cultural resource management and planning. Other divisions and agencies
contribute to land protection activities as part of the Open Space Program and federal and state
wildlife areas.
The Delaware Department of Agriculture (DDA) assists in administering the Delaware
Agricultural Lands Preservation program. The program includes land enrolled in ten-year
Agricultural Preservation Districts and land permanently protected through the Purchase of
Development Rights. Many of these properties include historic dwellings and agricultural
outbuildings, as well as archaeological sites. There two farms within the City limits protected
through the Purchase of Development Rights program of the Agricultural Lands Preservation
program: one on the north side of Route 8 at the City’s western boundary and the second along
Long Point Road on the east side of the City.
First State Heritage Park at Dover
The First State Heritage Park at Dover (FSHP) is a State park initiative established in 2004 that
focuses the historic resources of Dover in a non-traditional approach to a park. The concept creates
Delaware’s first urban “park without boundaries” linking together a series of historic and cultural
sites. It is a partnership of state agencies under the leadership of Delaware State Parks in addition
to the City and a variety of private entities (non-profits and churches). The First State Heritage
Park at Dover instituted “First Saturdays” to coordinate programming and interpretation at local
museums and participated in the development and installation of signage, wayfinding and
information features such as maps, banners, and waysides. The FSHP also focuses on the
promotion of heritage tourism with innovative opportunities to learn about Dover’s history through
costumed interpreters, hands-on children’s activities, and a variety of walking tours including the
popular “cemetery lantern tours.” The FSHP program is actively involved in the preservation,
restoration, and research of the one-story frame building located at 43 The Green, known as the
John Bell House.
Federal Agencies
The U.S. Department of the Interior administers most federal government programs and assistance.
The National Park Service, part of the Department of the Interior, maintains the National Register
of Historic Places and the Heritage Preservation Services program, and oversees the CLG
(Certified Local Government) program. These programs provide recognition, monetary assistance
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019 Page 6 - 7
Page 25
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
and tax incentives for rehabilitation projects of certified historic properties. The Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation administers the federal regulations for implementing Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and well as other programs such as the Preserve
America program. Section 106 requires federal agencies to consider the effects of projects (that
they carry out, approve or fund) on historic projects.
First State National Historical Park
In 2013, The Green in Dover was designated as part of the First State National Monument which
consists of the Woodlawn Property along the Brandywine Creek and the New Castle Courthouse
Complex of the New Castle Green and the Old Sheriff’s House. In 2015, these properties along
with other sites, such as the John Dickinson Plantation just east of Dover, became the First State
National Historical Park. The Green is owned by the City of Dover as parkland and agreements
(covenants) were established with the National Park Service as a result of the its designation as a
National Historical Park.
Other Organizations
Downtown Dover Partnership
The Downtown Dover Partnership formed in 2008 combining the Downtown Dover Development
Corporation, the Dover Parking Authority, and Main Street Dover. From its Bylaws, the purpose
of the Downtown Dover Partnership is “to promote the public welfare of the residents of the City
of Dover, Delaware by promoting and furthering in any way, the development of the economic,
cultural, and historic resources of the downtown area of the City of Dover and to provide for the
residents to the extent that the common good and general welfare of the community is served.”
This purpose statement also lists the following goals: to improve the opportunities for job creation,
to broaden the tax base through the development of the commercial and residential potential of the
Central Dover area, and to maintain and restore the historic and architectural and community
qualities of the downtown area consistent with the goals of the National Main Street Program.
The Downtown Dover Partnership continues to provide grants for historic properties through the
Facade Improvement Grant Program. The Downtown Delaware program, within the Department
of State’s Division of Small Business, provides technical assistance to the Downtown Dover
Partnership.
Friends of Old Dover
The Friends of Old Dover (previously also known as the Dover Historical Society) is a local non-
profit group that promotes preservation of properties with historical significance in Dover and
Kent County, Delaware. The group encourages the preservation and restoration of documents and
other memorabilia of historical, biographical, or genealogical significance. The Friends of Old
Dover educates citizens on Dover’s historical heritage by conducting Dover Days activities,
celebrations, memorial observations, educational programs and tours, and preservation awards.
Preservation Delaware, Inc.
Preservation Delaware, Inc. (PDI) is a statewide not-for-profit organization dedicated to preserving
historically and architecturally significant resources in the state. PDI provides information to
Delaware local governments and individual property owners seeking to preserve or rehabilitate
Page 6 - 8 –Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Page 26
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
historic structures. Its counterpart at the national level, the National Trust for Historic Preservation
provides leadership, education and advocacy to save America’s diverse historic places and
revitalize communities.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION: AVAILABLE PROGRAMS, INCENTIVES, AND
RESOURCES
Several assistance and certification programs are available to local governments and private
property owners pursuing historic and cultural resource preservation activities. There are other
approaches such as easements, covenants, and Transfer of Development Rights which may be
ways to assist in preservation activities as well. Four of the main programs and incentives are
described below.
Cer tified Local Government Program
In 1980, an amendment to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 established the Certified
Local Government (CLG) program to involve local governments in national preservation efforts.
Most states, including Delaware, created programs extending CLG status to local communities
with a local historic preservation district and a historic preservation commission. The CLG
program provides intensive protection to designated areas and eligibility for federal Historic
Preservation Funds. A Historic Preservation Fund grant from this program assisted in the
development of this Chapter. In addition, localities participating in the CLG program may
participate in the National Register nomination process for historic properties and are strongly
considered for training and technical assistance from the SHPO. The City of Dover was designated
a Certified Local Government in 2015.
Byways/Scenic and Historic Highways Program
Established and administered by the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), the
Delaware Byways/Scenic and Historic Highways program protects and promotes historically
significant corridors in Delaware through awareness and recognition. The program involves a
nomination process and the creation of a corridor plan. After receiving an official designation, the
sponsor must create and implement a corridor plan that includes a vision, goal statements, an
inventory of resources, a promotion and support plan, and a short-term action plan. Designated
corridors are eligible for grants through the Federal Highway Administration for the creation and
implementation of the plan. An area designated a Byway/Scenic and Historic Highway is promoted
through a number of State agencies. The Route 9 Coastal Heritage Highway (located east of Dover)
and the Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Byway (passes through Dover) have received this
designation.
Tax Credit Programs
Tax credit and incentive programs for historic preservation are available at the City, county, state,
and federal level for certified historic properties in Dover. The City of Dover Tax Credit Program
is administered by the Dover Historic District Commission and applies to exterior rehabilitations
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019 Page 6 - 9
Page 27
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
to properties within the local historic district or properties listed on the National Register of
Historic Places. The City program provides a tax credit amounting to 50% of the cost for approved
preservation, restoration, or rehabilitation project to the exterior architectural facades. The project
must cost a minimum of $1,200. The credit is provided in equal amounts over the period of ten
years with a maximum credit of $600 per year. The City’s program has had somewhat limited
participation.
The Tax Credit Program for Historic Properties in Kent County offers a county tax credit for
historic properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places based on preservation,
rehabilitation, and/or restoration projects involving exterior rehabilitations to the architectural
facades of buildings. The credit is applied to county property taxes and is similar in requirements
to the City program; however, the Kent County program is under-utilized.
The Delaware State Tax Credit Program applies to rehabilitations to those properties individually
listed on the National Register of Historic Places, those located within a National Register Historic
District and certified as contributing to the historical significance of that district, or those located
within a local historic district and deemed eligible for National Register listing. The rehabilitation
project must be certified by the SHPO and have “qualified” expenditures exceeding $5,000. The
tax credit ranges from 20-40% of the qualified expenditures and may be claimed after the SHPO
issues a certificate of completion for the project.
The U.S. Department of the Interior, in partnership with the U.S. Department of the Treasury and
the Internal Revenue Service, administers two federal tax credit programs (20% program and 10%
program) for rehabilitation projects on historic and non-historic properties. The 20% program
applies to improvements to those properties either listed on the National Register of Historic Places
or properties within a National Register Historic District that have obtained “Certified Historic
Structure” status through the SHPO. The rehabilitation project must be deemed a “certified
rehabilitation” to qualify for the tax credit program. The SHPO reviews these applications first
then forwards them to the National Park Service. The program provides a tax credit of 20% of the
total project cost and is applicable to all properties except owner-occupied residences. The 20%
credit may only be claimed after the National Park Service issues a certification of the completed
work and requires that the owner retain the property for a minimum of five years from the
completion of the project. The State and Federal Tax Credit programs have contributed to some
successful rehabilitation projects in Dover; however, the programs seem to be underutilized in
Dover as compared to other cities like Wilmington.
Incentive Programs
The City of Dover Code of Ordinances also establishes other development activity incentives for
the Downtown Redevelopment Target Area. Incentives range from tax abatement to reduction in
permit fees and impact fees depending on project criteria. Also, as part of the Downtown
Development District program there are other incentives and rebate programs available. Other
federal level incentives are the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program, Community
Development Block grant funds, and other programs administered by HUD.
Page 6 - 10 –Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Page 28
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
CULTURAL AND OTHER RESOURCES
The City of Dover not only possesses a number of historically significant structures, but also is
home to several unique cultural resources. As the capital of the state, Dover hosts many institutions
that illustrate and exemplify the cultural and historic character of both the City itself and the State
of Delaware as a whole. A few of these cultural and other resources are identified and described
below.
Museums and Cultural Institutions
Due to its own unique and rich history and its role as a state capital, the City of Dover hosts several
historical and cultural museums and institutions. In Dover, the Division of Historic and Cultural
Affairs administers the following state-owned museums which are accredited by the American
Alliance of Museums.
• The Old State House Museum
• Johnson Victrola Museum
Other museums and cultural institutions located in the City include:
• Air Mobility Command Museum (on the grounds of the Dover Air Force Base)
• Delaware Agricultural Museum and Village
• Delaware Public Archives (Hall of Records)
• Delaware State Police Museum and Education Center
• Delaware State University: Art Gallery
• Delaware State University Education and Humanities Theatre
• Dover Art League
• Dover International Speedway
• Legislative Hall
• Schwartz Center for the Arts (currently closed)
• Sewell C. Biggs Museum of American Art
• Various sculptures and memorials
Festivals, Celebrations, and Special Events
In addition to typical holiday celebrations and parades that are common to cities across the region
and the country, Dover hosts several festivals and celebrations that are distinctly unique to the
City. These include:
• African American Heritage Festival – A Citywide event recognizing the important role
of African American heritage in Dover.
• Amish County Bike Tour - Each September over 1,500 cyclists start this tour at
Legislative Mall area in Downtown Dover. The tour consisting of varying mile loops winds
through the Amish countryside southwest of Dover.
• Arts, Cultural and Heritage (ArCH) Field Days - ArCH Field Days for fourth grade
students are held on The Green in spring. The event managed by the First State Heritage
Park in collaboration with the National Park Service and other agencies and organization
reaches hundreds of students, teachers, and chaperones.
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019 Page 6 - 11
Page 29
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
• Arts on The Green – A Spring and Summer music and entertainment series that brings
family-style entertainment to Dover each week. The event is held on The Green.
• Dover Air Force Base Community Appreciation Days and Air Show Events – The
Dover Air Force Base hosts open houses and air show events.
• Dover Comic Con – This family-friendly, indoor-outdoor pop-culture festival held each
August is led by the Dover Public Library with other partner groups. It features vendors,
artists & artisans, authors, a cosplay competition, fan groups, pop-culture cars, food trucks
and panel discussions.
• Dover Days – A celebration of the historical heritage of Dover, held the first weekend of
May in the City’s historic district each year.
• Dover Mile – One of many races and walk-a-thons that travel through the historic district.
This one mile run and walk event sponsored by the Colonial Rotary Club of Dover is held
in June celebrating Flag Day.
• Firefly Music Festival - Dover International Speedway hosts the Firefly Music Festival
on its grounds known as The Woodlands located east of State Route 1. This multi-day
music festival brings artists in a variety of music genres and offers camping to its attendees.
• Governor’s Festivals at Woodburn – The Governor’s mansion hosts seasonal events
each year including a Fall Festival, Easter Egg Hunt and holiday events each December.
• July 4th Celebration – Legislative Hall provides a scenic backdrop for this annual
celebration and fireworks display.
• NASCAR Races– Dover International Speedway currently hosts two major stock car (and
truck) racing event weekends each year.
• Parades –Many parades travel the streets of Downtown Dover associated with holidays,
school and special events. One example is the St. Patrick’s Day Parade sponsored by
Downtown Dover Partnership.
Acknowledgment of Grant Assistance FFY2018 Certified Local Grant for Historic Preservation Chapter:
This Historic Preservation Plan Chapter of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan was produced with assistance from
the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior in
partnership with the Delaware Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs. Any opinions, findings, and
conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
reflect the views or polices of these agencies.
Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the
basis of race, color, national origin, disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have
been discriminated against in relation to this project, or if you desire further information, please write to:
Office of Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240.
Page 6 - 12 –Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Page 30
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Goal 1: Preserve and Protect Historic Resources
Preserve and provide better protection for historic resources and landscapes including individual
properties and historic districts to maintain community character, quality of life, and their
continued use.
Recommendation 1: Identification and Designation of the Dover Historic District Zone
• Identify and study properties and areas for potential future local Historic District
designation either as individual structures or as Historic District areas.
• Evaluate properties of interest and concentrated areas of historic resources for local
Historic District designation.
• Evaluate for local Historic District designation those areas currently listed in and/or eligible
for the National Register of Historic Places.
• Evaluate proposed annexation areas for historic resources to address needs for preservation
and protection.
Recommendation 2: Stewardship of Historic Resources
• Encourage stewardship activities by public and private owners of historic resources to
ensure the long-term care, protection, preservation, and continued existence of these
resources.
• Encourage appropriate stewardship of historic resources in City building projects and
infrastructure improvements located within designated historic districts or areas.
• Continue stewardship of The Green per the Preservation & Conservation Easement
established with its designation as a National Monument/National Historical Park.
• Develop strategies within disaster planning and disaster response plans that consider
historic resources.
Recommendation 3: Evaluation of Design Standards and Guidelines
• Evaluate and update the “Design Standards and Guidelines for the City of Dover Historic
District Zone.” This document was originally developed and adopted in 1992.
• Evaluate and consider the standards and guidelines regarding the levels of protection for
The Green and the Loockerman Street historic contexts.
• Evaluate and consider the use of modern materials and technologies in the standards and
guidelines.
Recommendation 4: Architectural Review Certification Process
• Refine the regulatory process and procedure for Architectural Review Certification for
properties located within the designated local Historic District Zone (H).
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019 Page 6 - 13
Page 31
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
• Offer education opportunities to the Historic District Commission, staff and the general
public on the Architectural Review Certification process.
• Evaluate process of requests for demolition and the identification of “demolition by
neglect” properties for code revisions and education opportunities.
Recommendation 5: Evaluate Impact of Development Activity on Historic Resources
• Explore other strategies, activities, and incentive programs to assist in the preservation and
protection of historic resources in order to balance the needs of preservation and
revitalization.
• Develop and/or improve incentives and ordinances that encourage the use of historic
structures and maintain historic integrity.
• Encourage use of flexible building codes when rehabilitation of existing historic buildings
is proposed.
• Focus planning initiatives on Downtown Dover to strengthen Loockerman Street and
adjoining areas while maintaining the balance of preservation and development activity.
• Ensure Community Development Block Grant Program activities complete the Section 106
Review process.
Recommendation 6: Support of Historic Resources and Landscapes
• Support consideration of historic resources and landscapes in development activities from
infill projects to land annexation.
• Continue to identify, assist, and review the nominations of eligible properties to the
National Register of Historic Places.
• Explore opportunities to amend or provide updated information to existing National
Register nominations to meet current standards.
• Explore opportunities to conduct and/or update the Delaware Cultural Resource Survey for
properties located within City limits.
• Ensure preservation efforts reflect the diversity of the community as reflected in the City’s
history, architecture, and culture.
• Recommend completion of a Self-Assessment for the Historic District Commission to
identify other strategic planning needs.
Goal 2: Provide and Promote Incentives for Preservation Activities
Provide and promote incentives for public and private preservation activities and the protection of
residential and non-residential historic properties including incentives to encourage continual use,
on-going maintenance of such properties, and appropriate in-fill project design.
Recommendation 7: Tax Credit Program for Historic Properties
• Continue the City’s Tax Credit Program for Historic Properties and promote awareness of
the program.
• Promote awareness of other Tax Credit Programs offered including State and Federal
programs.
Recommendation 8: Increase Participation in Resource-Bearing Programs
Page 6 - 14 –Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Page 32
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019
Chapter 6 Historic Preservation
Dover Comprehensive Plan 2019
• Continue participation in the Certified Local Government (CLG) program of the National
Park Service with a focus on increasing Historic District Commission training and
evaluating staff needs.
• Engage in evaluation, designation, and implementation of the Delaware Byways Program.
Goal 3: Increase Public Information on Historic Resources
Increase and promote dissemination of information on preservation activities, the value and
significance of historic resources, and historic and cultural heritage tourism opportunities to the
public and elected/appointed officials.
Recommendation 9: Public Outreach and Education
• Initiate educational programs on historic and cultural resources for the general public and
elected/appointed officials to increase awareness and understanding.
• Develop and/or update written and digital materials (brochures, process guides, web-based
postings, GIS mapping, etc.) on such topics as the local Historic District Zone, historic
resources, the Historic District Commission, the Architectural Review Certification
process, and the City’s Tax Credit Program for Historic Properties.
• Conduct workshop training with the Historic District Commission and Planning
Commission on preservation topics and the Architectural Review Certification process.
• Identify and implement methods of on-going communication with historic property owners
and interested groups.
Goal 4: Collaborate with Diverse Groups and Governments
Partner and collaborate with special interest groups and with municipal, state and federal
government agencies regarding preservation activities, cultural activities and heritage tourism.
Recommendation 10: Seek Assistance and Support of Interest Groups
• Continue to coordinate with and assist government agencies/officials and preservation
interest groups. Examples of these groups and agencies include the City Council, Planning
Commission, Historic District Commission, the Division of Historical & Cultural Affairs
(State Historic Preservation Office), the First State Heritage Park at Dover, and the First
State National Historical Park (National Park Service).
• Coordinate with preservation interest groups such as Downtown Dover Partnership,
Preservation Delaware, Friends of Old Dover, and others.
• Seek to educate other community-based organizations on preservation activities.
• Build relationships with the historic preservation programs and other related programs at
Delaware Technical & Community College, Delaware State University, Wesley College,
and the University of Delaware.
Release DRAFT #1 – 10.1.2019 Page 6 - 15
Page 33
City of Dover, DE 2019 Comprehensive Plan
File:
DRAFT
Map 6-1A: Historic Resources Date Updated: 10/01/2019
0 500 1,000 Feet
LEGEND
National Register Locations
National Register Districts
Victorian Dover Historic District
Dover Green Historic District
Parcels
Hydrology
Water Bodies
Roads
Dover Boundary
0 2,000 4,000 Feet
Inset Map
PAPER MAP DISCLAIMER:
By acceptance of this map material you agree to the following: This map material is
made available by the City of Dover, Delaware as a public service. The material is for
reference purposes only, and the City makes no warranty, re presentation, or guaranty
as to the accuracy of the material, including its accuracy, availability, use, and misuse.
In no event shall the City be liable for any direct or indirect damages suffered by the
Recipient or others arising from any inadequacies of the digital data or the Recipient's
use of this data. The material is in the public domain and may be copied without
permission. Citation to the source would be appreciated. Any errors or omissions in the
material should be reported to the City of Dover, Delaware's Public Works GIS
Division.
Page 34
City of Dover, DE 2019 Comprehensive Plan
File:
DRAFT
Map 6-1B: Historic Resources Date Updated: 10/01/2019
0 2,500 5,000 Feet
LEGEND
City of Dover
National Register
National Register Districts
Victorian Dover Historic District
Dover Green Historic District
Hydrology
Water Bodies
Roads
Dover Boundary
0 1,500 3,000 Feet
Inset Map
PAPER MAP DISCLAIMER:
By acceptance of this map material you agree to the following: This map material is
made available by the City of Dover, Delaware as a public service. The material is for
reference purposes only, and the City makes no warranty, re presentation, or guaranty
as to the accuracy of the material, including its accuracy, availability, use, and misuse.
In no event shall the City be liable for any direct or indirect damages suffered by the
Recipient or others arising from any inadequacies of the digital data or the Recipient's
use of this data. The material is in the public domain and may be copied without
permission. Citation to the source would be appreciated. Any errors or omissions in the
material should be reported to the City of Dover, Delaware's Public Works GIS
Division.