CCW Packet - REVISED 01-26-2021

Council Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda January 26, 2021 - 6:00 p.m. The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee agenda has been revised by removing Evaluation of Proposals - HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) Design and Install for the City of Dover Warehouse, City Hall, and Electric Administration Buildings. This meeting will be held remotely via WebEx. Public participation information is as follows: Phone: 1-408-418-9388 Link: https://rb.gy/xq5qxe Event number: 179 099 3281 Event password: DOVER (if needed) If you are new to WebEx get the app now at https://www.webex.com/ to be ready when the meeting starts. Public comments are welcomed on any item and will be permitted at the appropriate time. When possible, please notify the City Clerk (736-7008 or email at cityclerk@dover.de.us) should you wish to be recognized. Utility Committee Adoption of the Agenda (Actionable and Informational Items) Actionable Items 1. Annexation Request - 228 Mifflin Road, Owned by Debora G. Hansen 2. Recess of Utility Committee meeting Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Adoption of the Agenda Actionable Items 1. Proposed Budget Amendments to the 2019 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act (Staff recommendation: Approval of the proposed Budget amendment totaling $312,161 for Fiscal Year 2019)

Council Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda - January 26, 2021 Page 2 Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee - Actionable Items (Continued) 2. Segal Waters Consulting - Classification, Compensation and Benefit Study (Staff recommendation: Approval of the implementation of the Classification, Compensation and Benefit Study as presented) 3. Update on Body Worn Cameras (Staff recommendation: Approval of the proposed Body Worn Camera Program ($799,930.10 over five years) and the evidence manager position ($357,572.00 over five years) needed to maintain the program) 4. Review of Expenditures - Dover Police Academy (Staff recommendation: If the Committee determines that the program should be continued: 1) Approve the Spring Academy expenses if the State Academy is not a viable option for Spring 2021. 2) Recommend that the Council direct Police Command Staff to prepare a full budget for a FY 2021-22 Academy for the budget review process with assistance from the several departments affected) 5. Adjournment of Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Adoption of the Agenda Informational Items 1. COVID-19 Vaccine Information (Dr. Richard Pescatore, Chief Physician, Delaware Division of Public Health) 2. Update on Social Professional/Law Enforcement Collaborative 3. Adjournment of Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting Utility Committee Informational Items 1. Update on Stormwater Design Projects 2. Update on Silver Lake Dam Inspection 3. Update on the Decommissioning of the McKee Run Power Plant 4. Adjournment of Utility Committee meeting Adjournment of Council Committee of the Whole meeting S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Committee-Agendas\2021\01-26-2021 CCW Agenda - REVISED.wpd The agenda items as listed may not be considered in sequence. Pursuant to 29 Del.C. §1004(e)(2), this agenda is subject to change to include the addition or deletion of items, including executive sessions, which arise at the time of the meeting.

• PETITION TO ANNEX AND REZONE PROPERTY Before the Dover City Council of the Whole – Utility Committee January 26, 2021 File Number: AX-21-01 Ordinance Number: 2020-17 Applicant: Debora G. Hansen Owner of Record: Debora G. Hansen Property Address: 228 Mifflin Road, Dover DE Tax Parcel ID #: ED-00-076.14-01-08.00-000 Lot Size: 0.6087 acres (26,514.97 SF) Present Zoning: RS-1 (Single Family Residential Zone) Proposed Zoning: R-8 (One Family Residence Zone) SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) Comprehensive Plan Category 1: High Priority Annexation Areas Designation: Comprehensive Plan Residential Low Density Land Use Designation: Present Use: Single Family Dwelling Proposed Use: Single Family Dwelling Utility Availability: Electric: 228 Mifflin Road is not currently served by the City of Dover. Water and Sanitary Sewer: 228 Mifflin Road is not currently served by City of Dover Water or Sanitary Sewer. Water and Sanitary Sewer are available on the opposite side of Mifflin Road. This property is situated on the west side of the road. Installation of utilities will require DelDOT approval. The

property owner is responsible for any and all costs associated with extending and providing service to the existing dwelling including tapping the sanitary sewer and water mains, paying impact fees and obtaining permits. Staff Recommendation: The Electric Department has no objection to the annexation. The Department of Water & Wastewater has no objection to the annexation. Attachments: Letter regarding Sewer Availability from Kent County Public Works Annexation Map Exhibit AX-21-01

J!ent ~ountp Kent County 1JBepartment of ~ubltc Works Administrative Complex Wastewater Facilities 555 Bay Road Phone: 302-335-6000 (J)ivision of'Engineering Dover, DE 19901 Fax: 302-335-0365 (Handicapped Accessible) Phone: 302-744-2430 Fax: 302-736-2100 www.co.kent.de.us January 7, 2021 David S. Hugg, III, Director of Planning & Inspections City of Dover P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 RE: SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY 228 MIFFLIN ROAD TAX MAP PARCEL NO. ED-00-076.14-01-08.00 Dear Mr. Hugg: We are in receipt of the City's request, complying with the Office of State Planning Coordination submission requirements, for sewer service availability. Your correspondence indicates the parcel in question, (ED-00-076.14- 01-08.00) approximately 0.6087 +/- acres, is located entirely within Kent County. Based upon the proposed R-8 (One Family Residence Zone and SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone)) zonings and the land use limitations associated with these zoning classifications, we expect the proposed flow of 250 gallons per day (1 EDU equivalent) associated with this annexation to be within the City's requested flow envelope and are therefore covered by the City's Contract User Agreement. It appears that the resulting flow would be directed through the City of Dover's local gravity collection system to the County Pump Station No. 4, which in tum will flow to the Kent County Regional Resource Recovery Facility (KCRRRF). Any upgrades to the local/municipal system will be the responsibility of the City. Kent County has enough capacity in the downstream infrastructure to accommodate the proposed annexation. Please review your previous requests to update as needed. Sincerely, ~~~ Marie Betty Lafortune Engineering Project Manager I V:\PublicWorks\CONTRACTS - CONTRACT USERS\CU - Municipalities\DOVER - FLOW\Sewer Availability\City of Dover- Sewer Availability - 2-00- 076.14-01-08.00

City of Dover Application No.: AX-21-01 Department of Planning & Inspections R-8 RG-2 R-8 R-8 Site RM-1 Mi ffl ROS in R d R-8 R-8 Tile: Lands of Debora G. Hansen Ordinance #: 2020-17 Addresses: 228 Mifflin Rd Legend Parcel ID: ED-00-076.14-01-08.00-000 Existing Zoning: RS-1 Residential Single Family Zone Proposed Zoning: R-8 One Family Residence Zone Owner: SWPOZ Source Water Protection Overlay Zone Debora G. Hansen - Subject Property D Dover Boundary D Zoning Date: 11/25/2020 D Dover Parcels « D Kent County Parcels 0 100 200 400 Feet ~ SWPOZ Tier 3

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Committee of the Whole (Legislative and Finance) DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Planning Department DATE SUBMITTED: January 13, 2021 PREPARED BY: Tracey Harvey SUBJECT: Proposed Budget Amendment to the 2019 CDBG Action Plan with the special allocation authorized by the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: CARES Act Funding First Round Allocation REVIEWED BY: Planning Director EXHIBITS: CARES Act allocation award letter EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $312,161 AMOUNT BUDGETED: $312,161 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): TIMETABLE: Pending Council approval, the Planning Office will publish a public notice allowing a 5-day comment period for citizens to comment on the proposed amendment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Budget amendment totaling $312,161 for Fiscal Year 2019. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The City of Dover partnered with the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) to administer the first round of CARES Act funding to prevent, prepare and respond to coronavirus (COVID-19). The funds were used to provide motel vouchers to homeless families and individuals and pay utilities for persons facing disconnection of their services due to Covid-19. The first round of funding in the amount of $163,211 has been expended servicing 70 families and individuals. DHSS has agreed to continue to administer the grant with the second round of funding that will provide motel vouchers and pay utilities for persons facing disconnection of services due to Covid-19.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, DC 20410-7000 ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT September 11, 2020 The Honorable Robin Christiansen Mayor of Dover 15 Loockerman Plaza City Hall Dover, DE 19901-7327 Dear Mayor Christiansen: I am pleased to inform you of a special allocation to your jurisdiction of Community Development Block Grant funds to be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus (COVID-19). This allocation was authorized by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), Public Law 116-136, which was signed by President Trump on March 27, 2020, to respond to the growing effects of this historic public health crisis. The CARES Act made available $5 billion in Community Development Block Grant Coronavirus (CDBG-CV) funds. Of this amount, the Department immediately allocated $2 billion on March 27, 2020, the same day President Trump signed the Act, based on the fiscal year 2020 CDBG formula; this constituted the first round of CDBG-CV funds. Next, $1 billion was required by the Act to be allocated to States and insular areas within 45 days of enactment of the Act; HUD accomplished this on May 11, 2020, and this constituted the second round of CDBG-CV funds. Finally, the remaining $2 billion in CDBG-CV funds was required by the Act to be allocated to states and local governments at the discretion of the Secretary on a rolling basis; HUD accomplished this on September 11, 2020, and this constituted the third round of CDBG-CV funds. Additionally, up to $10 million will be set aside for technical assistance. Accordingly, this letter informs you that your jurisdiction’s allocation for the third round is $312,161. Your cumulative amount for all allocation rounds is $475,372. The CARES Act adds additional flexibility for both the CDBG-CV grant and, in some cases, for the annual FY2019 and FY2020 CDBG grants in these unprecedented times. The public comment period is reduced to not less than 5 days, grantees may use virtual public hearings when necessary for public health reasons, the public services cap is suspended during the emergency, and States and local governments may reimburse costs of eligible activities incurred for pandemic response regardless of the date. In addition, the CARES Act authorizes the HUD Secretary to grant waivers and alternative requirements of statutes and regulations the HUD Secretary administers in connection with the use of CDBG-CV funds and fiscal year 2019 and 2020 CDBG funds (except for requirements related to fair housing, nondiscrimination, labor standards, and the environment). Waivers and alternative www.hud.gov espanol.hud.gov

requirements can be granted when necessary to expedite and facilitate the use of funds to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CDBG CARES Act Federal Register Notice (FR-6218-N-01) was released on August 10, 2020. The notice describes the allocations and grant procedures applicable to the CDBG-CV grants. It also describes the program flexibilities, waivers, and alternative requirements that apply to the CDBG-CV grants as well as the fiscal year 2019 and 2020 CDBG grants. As further such flexibilities become available, they will be posted on HUD’s website and distributed to grantees. The Department will also support grantees with technical assistance. As you develop your plan for the use of these grant funds, we encourage you to consider approaches that prioritize the unique needs of low- and moderate–income persons and the development of partnerships between all levels of government and the private for-profit and non- profit sectors. You should coordinate with state and local health authorities before undertaking any activity to support state or local pandemic response. CDBG-CV grants will be subject to oversight, reporting, and the requirement that each grantee have adequate procedures to prevent the duplication of benefits (DOB). HUD will provide guidance and technical assistance on DOB, the prevention of fraud, waste, and abuse, and on documenting the impact of this program for beneficiaries. Reminder, all CPD Grantees must ensure they maintain active Dun and Bradstreet Numbering System (DUNS) numbers in the System for Award Management (SAM) system. Entities must have an active and unexpired DUNS before execution of grant agreements to avoid delays in the obligation of funds- which will delay your ability to drawdown funds in the Integrated Disbursement & Information System (IDIS). Grantees are required to maintain an active SAMs registration by re-activating their DUNS number annually in the SAM system for the entire drawdown period of their grants. DUNS numbers can be registered and renewed each year at the following website: https://www.sam.gov/SAM/. The Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD) is looking forward to working with you to successfully meet the urgent and complex challenges faced by our communities. If you or any member of your staff has questions, please contact your local CPD Field Office Director or CPDQuestionsAnswered@hud.gov. Sincerely, John Gibbs Acting Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Manager and Human Resources DATE SUBMITTED: 1/5/21 PREPARED BY: Matt Harline, Interim City Manager and Kim Hawkins, Human Resources Director REFERENCE: Classification, Compensation and Benefit Study conducted by Segal Waters Consulting (now Segal) RELATED PROJECT: Pay for Performance evaluation system REVIEWED BY: Matt Harline, Interim City Manager EXHIBITS: Presentation by Segal EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Approximately $173,000 would be required to fully implement the raises recommended by this report. AMOUNT BUDGETED: To be budgeted in future fiscal years FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Individual department budgets TIMETABLE: FY22 – FY24 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the implementation of the Classification, Compensation and Benefit Study as presented. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS In FY 2020 a Request for Proposal (RPP) was issued to hire a firm to complete a classification, compensation, benefits system and pay for performance evaluation system. After a careful review of the three proposals submitted, staff recommended that City Council award the project to Segal Waters Consulting which the Council approved at their regular meeting on March 9, 2020. A similar study, including a pay-for-performance study was last completed in the early 2000’s, and during the discussion at the Committee meeting of February 25, 2020, it was agreed to include the pay-for-performance as an option. The proposal and the subsequent study include all non-bargaining employees and a few positions represented by the labor group AFSMCE. The represented positions included, Accountant, Engineer, Librarian and Planner and these positions were identified due to some difficulties hiring and retaining employees in these positions. As a result of the study, Segal has completed the following tasks: created a market survey, created new salary ranges, assigned each position to a salary range, determine salary adjustments for employees, reviewed exemption status based on the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), created new job description and reviewed our benefits. Over the last ten months, the Segal working team completed an in-depth study of our current system. The internal process included discussions with Department Heads and presentations to employees. A key component of the project was the Job Description Questionnaire (JDQ) with specific questions about responsibilities and span of influence that each employee completed. The JDQs that the employees completed were reviewed by their supervisor/department head. The JDQ, along with market data, were the key elements in grading the position and assigning a salary range. The market analysis included both a survey of local governments and analysis of existing market surveys. Segal contacted 15 government entities to participate in the study. Ten (10) responded favorably to Segal’s request. Segal also reviewed three reputable published surveys. Finally, Segal analyzed the JDQ responses for the approximate 55 positions. There were 36 positions similar enough to be compared with positions from the 10

other organizations. Based upon market data, JDQs and internal equity, Segal used their own proprietary evaluation tool to develop the grade assignments for all positions, relying primarily on JDQs where there was no market data. To fully implement the recommendations of the study immediately, the approximate cost will be less than $173,000. This amount does not include salary adjustments made at July 1, 2020, and therefore the cost for full implementation would be slightly less. Any pay increases awarded since the time salaries were captured by Segal, will be taken into consideration before implementation. At a minimum, staff recommends for the Council to direct staff to budget funds to bring the 11 employees identified as being below their grade level, to be brought to the minimum salary of their assigned labor grade by July 1, 2021 at a cost of approximately $70,000. Approximately $103,000 will be required to adjust salaries for time in position for 23 employees (which includes the 11 below their assigned range). It is recommended that the other adjustments be phased in over three (3) years. When the study began, employees were assured that no employee’s salary would be decreased as a result of the study. Three (3) employees have salaries that exceeds the maximum salary range. Future annual payments could be made to these employees as a one-time lump sum payment rather than added to base salary, or salaries could be frozen until range adjustments allow for a raise. As with any salary increase, the supervisor, department head and the City Manager may limit or delay raises if there are documented performance issues. To put this in some perspective, remember that the majority of the positions analyzed were competitive and no adjustment was needed. Moreover, the total amount of proposed increases was slightly over 3% for the salaries considered, but less than 1% of wages for the entire City. Segal furthers recommend that a similar survey be completed every 3-4 years in order to remain competitive in the labor market. In regards to benefits, while our benefits are competitive, it was noted that our cost sharing for dependent vision insurance is less competitive compared to the other ten (10) public entities. Human Resources will be exploring opportunities to enhance this benefit for our employees. It should be noted that the Committee previously reviewed the Pay-for-Performance study and recommended that it be placed on hold until the new City Manager is brought on board. In conclusion, staff recommends that the results of the classification, compensation and benefits system study be approved and implemented as presented.

City of Dover Classification & Total Compensation Study Report of Findings & Recommendations January 2021 Paula Singer, Vice President / Cristy Reetz, Consultant / Katie Kiesel, Associate / Jack Jones, Associate Consultant © 2021 by The Segal Group, Inc.

│Agenda Introduction Total Compensation Classification Analysis Salary Structure Development Appendix 1

Introduction Background • The City of Dover (“Dover” or the “City”), located in Delaware, is dedicated to providing residents, businesses and visitors with a great place in which to live, work and visit • To ensure that the City of Dover is able to attract and retain top talent, as well as serve their community, Dover has engaged Segal to perform a classification, compensation and benefits study which will affect approximately 80 non-represented employees across 62 job titles • Segal worked collaboratively with the Dover Project Team, Matt Harline and Kim Hawkins, on decision making and deliverables • In this engagement, Segal completed the following activities: Project Total Compensation Classification Analysis Recommendations Initiation Assessment ✓ Leadership interviews ✓ Identification of custom ✓ Development of Job ❑ Prepare report of findings ✓ Collection and review of survey peers and Description and recommendations study documents published survey sources Questionnaire ❑ Presentation to Council ✓ Development, distribution ✓ Training for employees and analysis of survey on JDQ ✓ Collection and review of ✓ Collection and analysis of survey data JDQ ✓ Salary structure ✓ Classification structure development development ✓ FLSA review Report • The following report provides 1) the findings from the total compensation assessment, 2) the findings from the classification assessment, and 3) Segal’s overall recommendations and proposed next steps 2

Introduction Executive Summary Total Compensation Classification Analysis • Generally, the City is competitive against the market at • In select areas, there is a desire for additional career 91% of the market midpoint, which is within the ladders (e.g., engineers, Human Resources) Summary of Key Findings competitive range of 90-110% • Key features of the new classification structure should – Salary range minimums are currently slightly less include: competitive at 86% of market – Clear career paths • The City’s pay practices are slightly less competitive – Consistent job titling across departments than market, as peers offer more flexible work – Updated job descriptions that reflect current duties arrangements. The design of Dover’s pay program is and responsibilities consistent with peers • Benefits offered by the City of Dover are competitive – The medical plan provided is highly competitive – Rewards are competitive against peers – Retirement benefits lag slightly • Adopt the proposed salary structure consisting of 16 • Adopt the new classification structure, which includes: Summary of Recommendations grades – Creation of 5 new positions to allow for career – Bring all incumbents up to the minimum of their new growth and reflect unique duties and responsibilities salary range for a cost of $71,066 – Retitling of 22 jobs to promote role clarity and – Adjust individual salaries based on years in position simplify job titling for a cost of $122,088 – Update of FLSA status for 6 jobs at the City • Consider a phased implementation approach, for • Prepared 59 new job descriptions using the updated incumbents with an overall increase to control costs format to reflect current duties and responsibilities over 3 years • Adjust the salary structure annually. Conduct a market assessment every 3-4 years to ensure market alignment 3

│Agenda Introduction Total Compensation I. Compensation Assessment II. Benefits Assessment III. Total Compensation Assessment Classification Analysis Salary Structure Development Appendix 4

Compensation Assessment Market Data Collection Methodology Segal utilized the following methodology to gather and analyze market data for this study: • Custom Survey. Segal conducted a custom survey to gather information on base pay, pay policies, and benefits – The survey and all components were reviewed and approved by the Dover Project Team, Matt Harline and Kim Hawkins – Segal completed an extensive quality review of all survey data, including contacting respondents for data clarification and applying appropriate adjustments if there were significant differences between the Dover job and the survey job – Geographic adjustments, to the Dover, DE location, were applied to custom survey pay data reported • Published Survey. Segal utilized 3 reputable published surveys (CompAnalyst, ERI and PayFactors) to gather information on pay components – Following market best practices, the Dover jobs were matched based on the content of the job – Segal completed an extensive quality review of all survey data, including applying appropriate adjustments if there were significant differences between the Dover job and the survey job – The survey matches were reviewed, approved and validated by the Dover Project Team • Data Aging. All benchmark data were pulled based on a common date of May 1, 2020 Using these data sources, Segal benchmarked a total of 35 City of Dover jobs, which includes 63% of the select employee population covered in this study. 5

Compensation Assessment Peer Comparators • The Dover Project Team identified the following peer comparators based on geography and characteristics of the organizations Survey Peer Comparator Participation Cecil County, MD ✓ City of Frederick, MD ✓ City of Middletown City of Milford, DE ✓ City of Newark, DE ✓ City of Smyrna City of Wilmington, DE Delaware State University Kent County, DE ✓ New Castle County State of Delaware ✓ Sussex County, DE ✓ Town of Georgetown, DE ✓ Town of Ocean City, DE ✓ Town of Salisbury, MD1 ✓ 10 The City of Dover had 67% survey participation 1 Segal completed the survey based on the peer’s current salary structure. 6

Compensation Assessment Summary & Distribution of Individual Competitiveness City Level of Competitiveness Minimum Midpoint Maximum Custom Survey 88% 92% 95% Published Survey 84% 88% 86% Overall 86% 91% 92% • The City of Dover’s pay ranges are market competitive overall at the midpoints and maximums, with the minimums being below market. Market competitiveness is defined as 90-110% Distribution of Individual Competitiveness 1 37% 31% 17% 3% 11% Less than 90% 90-100% 100-110% Greater than 110% Insufficient Data • While overall the City of Dover’s midpoints are market competitive, individual jobs competitiveness will vary. In the above chart, most jobs with sufficient data2 (48%) are found in the market competitive corridor • Details on individual job competitiveness is on the next few slides 1 Chart does not equal 100% due to rounding. 2 Jobs with sufficient data have 4 or more matches. Insufficient data is defined as having fewer than 4 matches. 7

Compensation Assessment By Job Title (alpha order) City of Dover, DE Base Pay as % of Peer Market Average City of Dover, DE Count of % to % to % to Position Matches Minimum Midpoint Maximum Accountant 10 73% 77% 78% Central Services Director 0 N/A N/A N/A Chief Of Police 7 87% 100% 110% City Assessor 7 69% 72% 73% City Clerk 5 91% 106% 118% City Manager 7 84% 95% 104% Civil Engineer 8 88% 94% 96% Controller/Treasurer 11 110% 114% 115% Customer Services Manager 8 87% 88% 88% Electric Director 5 87% 91% 94% Electric Line Crew Supervisor 3 N/A N/A N/A Electrical Engineer 7 85% 91% 94% Environmental Scientist 5 101% 101% 99% Fire Marshal 3 N/A N/A N/A Fleet And Facilities Manager 8 67% 66% 64% Fleet Services Coordinator 7 86% 90% 84% GIS Manager 7 77% 80% 81% Human Resources Coordinator 9 85% 89% 90% Human Resources Director 12 97% 100% 100% 8

Compensation Assessment By Job Title (alpha order) continued City of Dover, DE Base Pay as % of Peer Market Average City of Dover, DE Count of % to % to % to Position Matches Minimum Midpoint Maximum Information Technology Director 12 95% 97% 98% Librarian 7 100% 95% 89% Library Director 6 87% 90% 88% Parks And Recreation Director 6 75% 77% 78% Payroll Specialist 10 79% 86% 88% Planner 8 95% 95% 94% Planning Director 9 96% 100% 103% Principal Planner 7 79% 84% 85% Public Works Director 8 97% 99% 100% Recreation Center Coordinator 7 74% 77% 78% Senior LAN Analyst 9 80% 82% 83% Supervisor Of A Public Works Division 8 73% 76% 77% Supervisor Of Property/ Code Enforcement 2 N/A N/A N/A Water Production Supervisor 7 91% 96% 95% Water Wastewater Utility Director 7 96% 101% 103% Water/Wastewater Supervisor 11 81% 83% 81% 9

Compensation Assessment Summary of Findings • When combining the data collected from the custom and published surveys. Dover is at 91% of the overall market midpoint and just within the competitive range (defined as 90% to 110%) 135% % of Market Median 120% 105% 92% 88% 91% 90% 75% 60% 45% 30% 15% 0% Custom Survey Published Surveys Total Competitive Range (90% to 110% of Market) 10

Benefits Assessment Evaluation Method for Assessing Competitiveness • Considering all of the numerical values for each benefit provision assessed for a particular benefit plan, Segal makes a qualitative judgment about competitive positioning based on the rating table below: Statistical Reference Rating The plan consistently scores in the top 2 quartiles The plan consistently scores near or above the median with more scores below the 3rd quartile than above it The plan generally scores near the median or has variable scores; some above median and equally some below The plan consistently scores near or below the median with more values above the 1st quartile than below it The plan consistently scores below the median with most values at or below the 1st quartile Not Competitive Less Competitive Competitive More Competitive Highly Competitive 11

Benefits Assessment Summary of Findings1 • In general, the benefits offered by Dover are competitive. The table below provides an overview of the competitive positioning by offering: City of Dover Benefit Offering Overall Observations • Competitive with the market, as 67% of peers also offer more Medical Plans Offered than one medical plan Total Health Plan Offerings, • The City is Competitive with the market average of total monthly cost in the PPO and HMO plans Medical, Dental, & Vision • Competitive with the cost share on PPO and HMO plans as Cost and Cost Share well • Competitive PPO plan, as the City contributes on average with an 85/15 cost share with employees across all tiers of Medical & Prescription Drugs, coverage, while peers have similar cost share offerings PPO Cost and Cost Share • Monthly premiums for employees are Competitive than peers, since they are similar to the market average • Less Competitive compared to peers, as employees are Dental responsible for 100% of dental premiums, in any tier of coverage. Three other peers do not cover any cost to dental. • The City covers all costs for the employee, making the program Highly Competitive Vision • Less Competitive compared to the market when a child, spouse or family is added, as the cost share goes as low as 30/70 for family coverage Not Competitive Less Competitive Competitive More Competitive Highly Competitive 1 Additional information on the benefits assessment can be found in Appendix I or the additional excel document provided to the Dover Project Team. 12

Benefits Assessment Summary of Findings1 continued City of Dover Benefit Offering Overall Observations • Competitive compared to market, as peers reported providing Defined Benefit Retirement an average match of 9.8% as their total contributions to their Plan defined benefit program, only 0.3% higher than Dover’s match • More Competitive compared to market as most peers do not Defined Contribution offer this type of retirement plan. Dover offers employees Retirement Plan both defined benefit and defined contribution plan • Highly Competitive to the market as Dover provides employees with an average of 3 more days of vacation • Most peers offer personal days. Not Competitive as this type Time Off of leave is not provided by the City • Dover offers one less holiday than peers, making the City Less Competitive • Competitive additional benefits, including tuition Other Benefits reimbursement, employee assistance, and wellness • The majority of the peers and the City do not offer Rewards N/A performance-based rewards Not Competitive Less Competitive Competitive More Competitive Highly Competitive 1 Additional information on the benefits assessment can be found in Appendix I or the additional excel document provided to the Dover Project Team. 13

Total Compensation Assessment Summary of Findings • The following data are included in the Total Compensation Analysis: – Base Pay Midpoint – Market Average Cost of PPO, HMO, and HDHP plans – Market Average of Employer Contribution Towards Retirement Benefits • Defined Benefit (normal cost only) • Defined Contribution • Deferred Compensation • Social Security • The City of Dover’s market competitiveness increases slightly when looking at a Total Compensation package, as shown in the table below: Total Compensation City of Dover, DE as a % of Market 93% 14

│Agenda Introduction Total Compensation Classification Analysis I. Methodology II. Summary of Findings III. FLSA Analysis IV. Segal Evaluator V. Job Description Update Salary Structure Development Appendix 15

Classification Analysis Methodology • A classification analysis is conducted to 1) better understand the work and services that are being performed by staff and 2) best define job titles, job duties and minimum requirements • In addition, a job evaluation creates an internal hierarchy to best understand how jobs relate to one another • Segal utilized the following methodology to conduct a classification analysis and job evaluation of 54 non- represented and select represented positions Developing a Job Leading 4 Reviewing 72 Creating a Analysing FLSA Updating Job Description Employee employee completed Classification Status Descriptions Questionnaire (JDQ) Presentations JDQs Structure • In addition to the details provided in this report, the Dover Project Team has received 1) the job description questionnaire, 2) the employee presentation, and 3) the classification structure in excel • Segal conducted employee presentations as a way to introduce the employees to the job description questionnaires and to process that would follow 16

Classification Analysis Summary of Findings Based on the results of the classification analysis, Segal recommends taking the following steps: 1. Adopt new classification structure for non-represented and a few represented positions, in which 5 new classifications were recommended: • Civil Engineer II • Executive Assistant to the City Manager • Fire Marshal • Electrical Engineer II • Human Resources Coordinator II 2. Review FLSA Status for all positions, review and consider adjusting the FLSA status for the following titles: Exempt Non-Exempt • Engineering Services & System Operations Supervisor • Building Supervisor (combined with Service Center Clerk) • GIS Manager • Librarian I • Planner I • Recreation Center Coordinator 3. Approve proposed job description format in order to draft job descriptions for 59 City of Dover jobs1 to reflect the current minimum requirements and core responsibilities of the position 4. Communicate changes to classification to all affected employees and share the updated job description 1 Includes 5 new recommended positions 17

Classification Analysis FLSA Analysis • As part of the classification analysis, Segal conducted a review of the FLSA status for 59 job at the City of Dover. This review was conducted by applying the test defined by the Department of Labor regulation to the Job Description Questionnaires completed and reviewed by the City of Dover • Based on our analysis, 80% of reviewed jobs should be classified as exempt and 20% as non-exempt1 Current Proposed Exempt 36 47 Non-Exempt 13 12 Multiple 2 0 Vacant 8 0 Total 59 59 • For the proposed 47 exempt positions at the City, the most common FLSA Exemption Criteria is “Executive” Count Percent Administrative Exemption 9 19% Computer Employee Exemption 1 2% Executive Exemption 19 40% Police, Fire Fighters, Paramedics & Other First Responders 2 4% Professional Exemption 16 34% Total 47 100% 1 Segal’s recommendations regarding FLSA exemptions do not constitute a legal opinion. The City of Dover may wish to have our recommendations reviewed by independent legal counsel. 18

Classification Analysis Segal EvaluatorTM (SE) • In addition to considering the JDQs completed by employees, Segal applied the Segal EvaluatorTM (“SE”) tool to assess internal equity. The eight (8) compensable factors included in the tool are described below: Measures the minimum formalized training or education that is required for entry Formal Education into the position Measures the minimum level of work experience required for entry into the Experience position Measures the supervisory or managerial role of the job and the degree of Management/Supervision complexity of work performed by those being supervised Measures the job requirements of interaction with others outside direct reporting Human Collaboration Skills relationships Freedom to Act/Impact of Measures the degree of freedom to exercise authority as well as assesses the Action impact of actions measures the knowledge and skill level required by the job and how the Knowledge & Skills application impacts the City Fiscal Responsibility and/or Measures the accountability and participation, if any, as it relates to the fiscal Risk Impact accountability for one’s department or assigned area(s) of responsibility Measures the surroundings or physical conditions under which the work must Working Conditions be performed • Each of the factors listed above have multiple levels and points associated with those levels. The sum of the points for the 8 compensable factors determines the assigned grade 19

Classification Analysis Job Description Update • Based on the finalization of the classification analysis, the City of Dover and Segal drafted new job descriptions for 59 jobs using the 72 JDQs completed by employees • Job descriptions are important documents that: – Provide a detailed summary of characteristics and responsibilities of the job – Establish the job purpose and core essential functions (or duties) and define the approximate time spent on each function – Define the criteria (e.g., education, experience, specialized training, certifications) necessary to be successful in the role – Capture information regarding the job’s working environment such as the level of autonomy and reporting relationships • Accurate and up to date are essential for various initiatives including – Benchmarking and Grade Assignment – Recruiting and Promotion – Performance Review 20

│Agenda Introduction Total Compensation Classification Analysis Performance Management Salary Structure Development I. Methodology II. Proposed Structure III. Implementation Appendix 21

Salary Structure Methodology Purpose • A salary structure defines ranges of pay for jobs within an organization and helps to manage: – The minimum and maximum of pay for jobs – The progression of jobs within the City – The desired relationship to market – The appropriate individual pay positioning reflective of skill, experience, and performance Development Methodology • Market data midpoints were used as a reference for creating the salary structure • The Segal Evaluator (SE) is used to determine the number of salary grades the structure needs • Jobs were assigned to the salary grade with the midpoint closest to the market midpoint for the job1 to ensure competitiveness; assignments were also reviewed and modified as needed to ensure internal equity ILLUSTRATIVE METHODOLOGY Grade B Grade A Minimum Midpoint Maximum 1 Non-benchmark jobs were assigned to the salary structure based on Segal Evaluator (SE) and an internal comparison to a similar benchmark job. 22

Salary Structure Proposed Structure • The salary structure below is developed for the non-represented positions and a few represented positions in the City Proposed Salary Structure Proposed Hourly Rates Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum Minimum Midpoint Maximum 1 $28,000 $35,000 $42,000 $13.46 $16.83 $20.19 2 $30,300 $37,800 $45,300 $14.57 $18.17 $21.78 3 $32,800 $40,900 $49,000 $15.77 $19.66 $23.56 4 $35,400 $44,200 $53,000 $17.02 $21.25 $25.48 5 $38,300 $47,800 $57,300 $18.41 $22.98 $27.55 6 $41,400 $51,700 $62,000 $19.90 $24.86 $29.81 7 $44,800 $55,900 $67,000 $21.54 $26.88 $32.21 8 $48,400 $60,400 $72,400 $23.27 $29.04 $34.81 9 $52,300 $65,300 $78,300 $25.14 $31.39 $37.64 10 $56,500 $70,600 $84,700 $27.16 $33.94 $40.72 11 $61,100 $76,300 $91,500 $29.38 $36.68 $43.99 12 $66,000 $82,500 $99,000 $31.73 $39.66 $47.60 13 $71,300 $89,100 $106,900 $34.28 $42.84 $51.39 14 $77,100 $96,300 $115,500 $37.07 $46.30 $55.53 15 $83,300 $104,100 $124,900 $40.05 $50.05 $60.05 16 $89,700 $116,600 $143,500 $43.13 $56.06 $68.99 17 $107,700 $140,000 $172,300 $51.78 $67.31 $82.84 23

Salary Structure Proposed Structure continued Proposed Salary Structure Grade Job Titles Min Mid Max 1 None Assigned $28,000 $35,000 $42,000 2 • Administrative Assistant $30,300 $37,800 $45,300 • Accounting Specialist 3 • Executive Assistant to the City Manager $32,800 $40,900 $49,000 4 None Assigned $35,400 $44,200 $53,000 5 • FOIA/Records Coordinator $38,300 $47,800 $57,300 6 • Payroll Specialist $41,400 $51,700 $62,000 • Accountant 7 • Budget Analyst • Fleet Services Coordinator $44,800 $55,900 $67,000 • Librarian I • Code Enforcement Supervisor • Environmental Scientist • Planner I 8 • Customer Service Supervisor • Human Resources Coordinator I • Recreation Center Coordinator $48,400 $60,400 $72,400 • Civil Engineer I • Water & Wastewater • Assistant City Clerk 9 • Human Resources Coordinator II Supervisor $52,300 $65,300 $78,300 • Billing & Collections Supervisor • Librarian II • Water Production Supervisor • Civil Engineer II • Field Supervisor II • GIS Manager 10 • Customer Service Director • Fire Marshal • Senior LAN Analyst $56,500 $70,600 $84,700 • Assistant Library Director 11 • Electrical Engineer I • Fleet & Facilities Manager $61,100 $76,300 $91,500 • Construction Manager • Assistant Controller & Treasurer • Electrical Engineer II • Principal Planner 12 • City Assessor • Line Crew Manager $66,000 $82,500 $99,000 • Water Production Manager • Contract & Procurement Manager • Financial Reporting & Accounting Manager 13 • City Clerk • Engineering & Systems Operations Supervisor $71,300 $89,100 $106,900 • Central Services Director • Director of Parks & Recreations 14 • Director of Water & Wastewater $77,100 $96,300 $115,500 • Deputy Chief of Police • Library Director • Controller & Treasurer • Information Technology Director • City Planner & Economic 15 • Human Resources Director • Public Works Director Development Director $83,300 $104,100 $124,900 16 • Assistant City Manager • Chief of Police • Electric Director $89,700 $116,600 $143,500 17 • City Manager $107,700 $140,000 $172,300 24

Implementation Cost to Minimum Cost to Minimum Targeted Positioning • Upon the implementation date Grade Incumbents Impacted Cost to Minimum of a revised salary structure, 1 0 $0 all incumbents should be 2 0 $0 brought to at least their salary 3 0 $0 grade minimum 4 0 $0 • The total cost to the new 5 1 $2,940 grade minimums is $71,066 6 1 $1,131 • This total cost represents 7 1 $2,885 1.86% of current payroll, as 8 5 $13,533 it relates to the annual 9 3 $12,465 salaries for the 56 incumbents 10 3 $24,337 included in the analysis 11 1 $4,108 ($3,816,094) 12 1 $6,262 13 0 $0 14 1 $3,406 15 0 $0 16 0 $0 17 0 $0 Total 17 $71,066 25

Implementation Time in Position Cost Time in Position Targeted Positioning • As an optional step, Dover Grade Incumbents Impacted Cost to Target1 should review the placement of 1 0 $0 all individuals1 within their salary 2 0 $0 range 3 1 $471 • Between 0 and 10 years in 4 0 $0 position, an individual would 5 0 $0 receive a 2.5% increase to their 6 1 $2,070 salary. From 11 to 15 years in 7 1 $1,094 position, the incumbent would 8 5 $23,001 receive a 1.75% increase to 9 4 $10,199 base salary 10 4 $20,917 • The total cost to the target 11 2 $7,630 placement would be $122,088 12 4 $30,784 13 0 $0 • This total cost represents 3.20% 14 1 $1,928 of current payroll, as it relates to the annual salaries for the 56 15 2 $23,339 incumbents included in the 16 1 $657 analysis ($3,816,094) 17 0 $0 Total 26 $122,088 1 Additional information on the ranges for placement can be found in Appendix II. 26

Implementation Costing Summary • In summary, the total cost to The City of Dover would be approximately $193,154 or 5.06% of the current payroll1: 1. Bring 17 incumbents to the minimum of the adjusted salary range 2. Bring 26 incumbents to their target placement in their adjusted salary range Costing Step Incumbents Impacted Cost Structure Minimum 17 $71,066 Individual Placement 26 $122,088 Total Gross Payroll Cost 31 $193,154 Key Decision Point: Approve costing for the adjusted Salary Structure. 1 This total cost represents 5.06% of current payroll for the 56 incumbents included in the analysis ($3,816,094) 27

Implementation Options • Typically, organizations implement new salary structures over several years. Segal recommends following a multi-year implementation plan at the City of Dover to manage annual costs • The table below presents the estimated annual costs to 1. Bring incumbents to the structure minimum 2. Move incumbents through the structure based on years in position 3. Costing assumes that incumbents will receive a maximum adjustment of $5,000 annually Percent of Cost Payroll1 Year 1 $135,586 3.55% Year 2 $46,356 1.21% Year 3 $11,213 0.29% Total $193,154 5.06% 1 Current payroll represents the sum of the annual salaries ($3,816,094) for incumbents (N=56) included in the analysis. Totals may be off slightly due to rounding. 28

Implementation Ongoing Maintenance The maintenance of a salary structure should be an ongoing process: • Communication. Provide total compensation statements to employees on an annual basis so they understand the value of what they receive from the City (including benefits) • Attraction and Retention. Pay attention to Dover’s ability to recruit and retain staff. If there are difficulties for specific positions, it may be time to review the position’s salary grade and consider adjustments • Job Descriptions. Review job descriptions annually during performance reviews to ensure accuracy. Accurate up-to-date job descriptions will help the City of Dover to ensure pay positioning is appropriate based on the position responsibilities and knowledge, skill, and ability required to perform those responsibilities • Red Circling Policy. If an individual is at or above the maximum of their salary range, Segal recommends providing any applicable increases in the form of a lump sum in lieu of an increase to their base salary. Currently, 3 individuals are above the maximum of their proposed range for an annual cost of $17,190 • Annual Adjustments. Adjust the salary structure annually (if possible) using an amount reflective of market movement. Segal provides clients an Annual Compensation Planning Analysis Survey every fall that can be used to obtain this adjustment factor, at no charge • Market Assessments. Assesses the competitiveness of the salary structure, via a competitive compensation assessment, compared to the market every three to four years to ensure alignment 29

│Agenda Introduction Total Compensation Classification Analysis Performance Management Salary Structure Development Appendix I. Benefits Assessment Details II. Individual Placement Details III. Managing Individual Pay – Implementation Option 30

I. Benefits Assessment Details Prevalent Pay Practices • The City of Dover offers some differentials and other additional pay practices, below are some comparisons to the overall offerings of the peer employers. Provisions Dover Peers Pay Differentials Approximately 70% of peers provide a shift differential. Typical practices include only Shift Differential None providing the differential to non-exempt, hourly, union or emergency workers. Differentials are provided as a flat rate or percentage of the employee’s hourly rate 1 hour at current rate per Generally peers provide a flat rate for a specified number of hours an employee is on- On-Call Pay day call. Approximately 80% of peers surveyed offer this type of pay differential Only 1/3 of peers provide bilingual pay per month or per pay period. The differential Bilingual Pay None ranges from approximately $80 to $100 Additional Pay Policies Hire above Yes, but internal equity must 67% of peers allow hiring above the minimum of the range. It is common practice to consider Minimum be considered internal equity when making hiring decisions Flexible Work No 56% of peers offer flexible work Schedule Remote Work No 67% of offer remote work Compressed Work No 56% of peers offer compressed work Use of Automobile No 56% of peers offer use of an automobile 31

I. Benefits Assessment Details Prevalence of Medical Benefits • Generally, Dover offers a wider variety of health plans to employees than their peers Provisions Dover Peers Type of Health Plans State of Delaware Plan Yes 22% Long Term Disability Yes 89% Group Life Insurance Yes 100% Retirement Healthcare Benefit Yes 67% Benefits Varying by Job Level No 0% Health Plans Offered Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) Plan Yes 100% Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) Yes 56% High Deductible Health Plan (HDHP) Plan No 44% Prescription Drug Plan (included in medical cost) Yes 100% Dental Coverage (included in medical cost) No 11% Vision Coverage (included in medical cost) No 22% 32

I. Benefits Assessment Details Monthly Premiums for Total Health Benefits • Below, we present an average of the total health and welfare1 monthly costs, across all tiers of coverage, to the employer and the employee: PPO/POS HMO HDHP Survey Participants ER2 EE3 ER2 EE3 ER2 EE3 Town of Ocean City, MD $1,236 $309 $1,085 $121 $944 $167 Town of Georgetown, DE N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sussex County, DE $658 $71 N/A N/A N/A N/A Cecil County, MD $1,389 $217 N/A N/A $1,701 $121 City of Newark, DE $1,760 $155 $1,763 $155 $1,339 $8 City of Milford, DE4 $1,283 $308 $1,183 $290 N/A N/A City of Frederick, MD $1,259 $458 $607 $238 $470 $193 State of Delaware5 $1,197 $140 $1,233 $176 N/A N/A Kent County, DE $2,091 $344 N/A N/A N/A N/A Market Average $1,359 $250 $1,174 $196 $1,113 $122 City of Dover, DE $1,283 $308 $1,183 $290 N/A N/A 1. The total health and welfare costs are inclusive of the primary health, prescription drug, dental, and vision programs. 2. ER: Employer Contribution. 3. EE: Employee Contribution. 4. Used Dover’s reported rates for City of Milford, as they are both in the state program 5. The State of Delaware reported their FY20 rates 33

I. Benefits Assessment Details Cost Sharing for Total Health Benefits • Below, we present an average of the total health and welfare1 monthly cost share, across all tiers of coverage, to the employer and the employee: PPO/POS HMO HDHP Survey Participants ER2 EE3 ER2 EE3 ER2 EE3 Town of Ocean City, MD 80% 20% 90% 10% 85% 15% Town of Georgetown, DE N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sussex County, DE 90% 10% N/A N/A N/A N/A Cecil County, MD 87% 13% N/A N/A 93% 7% City of Newark, DE 92% 8% 92% 8% 99% 1% City of Milford, DE4 81% 19% 80% 20% N/A N/A City of Frederick, MD 73% 27% 72% 28% 71% 29% State of Delaware5 90% 10% 88% 12% N/A N/A Kent County, DE 86% 14% N/A N/A N/A N/A Survey Average 84% 16% 86% 14% 90% 10% City of Dover 81% 19% 80% 20% N/A N/A 1. The total health and welfare costs are inclusive of the primary health, prescription drug, dental, and vision programs. 2. ER: Employer Contribution. 3. EE: Employee Contribution. 4. Used Dover’s reported rates for City of Milford, as they are both in the state program 5. The State of Delaware reported their FY20 rates 34

I. Benefits Assessment Details Monthly Premiums for PPO Plan • Below, we present the monthly premiums for each peer and market average, across all tiers of coverage, to the employer and the employee: EE Only EE + Child EE + Spouse Family Survey Participant ER EE ER EE ER EE ER EE Town of Ocean City, MD $530 $132 $1,348 $337 $1,348 $337 $1,718 $430 Town of Georgetown, DE N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sussex County, DE $323 $21 $660 $65 $660 $65 $890 $110 Cecil County, MD $538 $60 $1,320 $181 $1,541 $236 $1,762 $291 City of Newark, DE $831 $0 $1,582 $131 $1,748 $160 $2,530 $297 City of Milford, DE1 $711 $125 $1,094 $193 $1,473 $260 $1,840 $325 City of Frederick, MD $665 $226 $1,378 $463 $1,378 $463 $1,613 $542 State of Delaware2 $668 $28 $1,015 $42 $1,381 $58 $1,727 $72 Kent County, DE $1,130 $85 $1,713 $231 $2,393 $401 $2,879 $522 Market Average $674 $85 $1,264 $205 $1,490 $248 $1,870 $324 City of Dover, DE $711 $125 $1,094 $193 $1,473 $260 $1,840 $325 1. Used Dover’s reported rates for City of Milford, as they are both in the state program 2. The State of Delaware reported their FY20 rates 35

I. Benefits Assessment Details Cost Sharing for PPO Plan • Below, we present the monthly cost share for each peer and market average, across all tiers of coverage, to the employer and the employee: EE Only EE + Child EE + Spouse Family Survey Participant ER EE ER EE ER EE ER EE Town of Ocean City, MD 80% 20% 80% 20% 80% 20% 80% 20% Town of Georgetown, DE N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sussex County, DE 94% 6% 91% 9% 91% 9% 89% 11% Cecil County, MD 90% 10% 88% 12% 87% 13% 86% 14% City of Newark, DE 100% 0% 92% 8% 92% 8% 89% 11% City of Milford, DE 85% 15% 85% 15% 85% 15% 85% 15% City of Frederick, MD 75% 25% 75% 25% 75% 25% 75% 25% State of Delaware 96% 4% 96% 4% 96% 4% 96% 4% Kent County, DE 93% 7% 88% 12% 86% 14% 85% 15% Market Average 89% 11% 87% 13% 86% 14% 86% 14% City of Dover, DE 85% 15% 85% 15% 85% 15% 85% 15% 1. Used Dover’s reported rates for City of Milford, as they are both in the state program 2. The State of Delaware reported their FY20 rates 36

I. Benefits Assessment Details Social Security Participation • The social security participation at Dover are consistent with their peers. 100% of peers participate in social security Survey Participants Social Security OASDI Medicare Town of Ocean City, MD Yes 6.2% 1.45% Town of Georgetown, DE Yes 6.2% 1.45% Sussex County, DE Yes 6.2% 1.45% Cecil County, MD Yes 6.2% 1.45% City of Newark, DE Yes 6.2% 1.45% City of Milford, DE Yes 6.2% 1.45% City of Frederick, MD Yes 6.2% 1.45% State of Delaware Yes 6.2% 1.45% Kent County, DE Yes 6.2% 1.45% City of Dover Yes 6.2% 1.45% 37

I. Benefits Assessment Details Retirement Plan Offerings and Financials • The defined benefit plan at Dover is slightly less competitive when compared to their peers. Generally, survey respondents had a higher employer contribution with an average of 11.04%. The majority (67%) of the City of Dover’s peers provide a defined benefit plan Defined Benefit Plan EE ER Normal ER EE Contributions Total Survey Participants Provided Cost1 Contribution Contribution Picked up by Contribution ER? Town of Ocean City, MD No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Town of Georgetown, DE Yes 6.3% 12.0% 5.0% No 6.3% Sussex County, DE Yes 9.9% 11.7% 3.0% Yes 12.9% Cecil County, MD Yes 10.2% 10.2% 7.0% No 10.2% City of Newark, DE No N/A N/A 4.5% No N/A City of Milford, DE Yes 6.3% 12.0% 5.0% No 6.3% City of Frederick, MD No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A State of Delaware Yes 6.3% 12.0% 5.0% Yes 11.3% Kent County, DE Yes 6.8% 8.4% 5.0% Yes 11.8% Survey Average N/A 7.66% 11.04% 4.93% N/A 9.8% City of Dover Yes 9.50% 9.50% 3.5% No 9.5% 1 The ER Normal Cost (Employer Normal Cost) is the percentage of retirement benefit minus the unfunded liability 38

I. Benefits Assessment Details Retirement Plan Offerings and Financials continued • The defined contribution plan at Dover is competitive when compared to their peers. Only a handful of peers (22%) provide this type of retirement plan. Defined Contribution Plan Type of ER Max EE Survey Participants Max ER Match Plan Contribution Contribution Town of Ocean City, MD 401a 7.00% N/A 7.00% Town of Georgetown, DE None N/A N/A N/A Sussex County, DE None N/A N/A N/A Cecil County, MD None N/A N/A N/A City of Newark, DE 401(a) N/A 6.00% 6.00% City of Milford, DE None N/A N/A N/A City of Frederick, MD None N/A N/A N/A State of Delaware None N/A N/A N/A Kent County, DE None N/A N/A N/A Survey Average N/A 7.00% 6.00% 6.50% City of Dover ICMA 3.00% 6.00% IRS Max 39

I. Benefits Assessment Details Retirement Plan Offerings and Financials • The City of Dover offers a voluntary deferred compensation plan. Only a handful of peers provide an average employer match of approximately $350 Deferred Compensation Plan ER ER Match ER Match EE Survey Participants Type of Plan Contribution (%) ($) Contribution Town of Ocean City, MD 457b Flat $ N/A $200 None Town of Georgetown, DE None N/A N/A N/A N/A Sussex County, DE Valic/Naco None N/A N/A N/A Cecil County, MD 457 Flat $ N/A $500 None 457 Deferred City of Newark, DE None N/A N/A 5% Compensation Plan Defer -Delaware City of Milford, DE None N/A N/A N/A Retirement Savings Plan City of Frederick, MD Empower 457b None N/A N/A N/A Defer -Delaware State of Delaware None N/A N/A N/A Retirement Savings Plan Kent County 457 Kent County, DE None N/A N/A N/A Deferred Comp Plan Survey Average N/A $350 N/A City of Dover ICMA or Nationwide None N/A N/A None 40

I. Benefits Assessment Details Time Off Benefits: Holidays • Dover offers fewer holidays and does not provide a floating holiday, which makes it less competitive. To increase competitiveness, the City could give employees a day off for General Election Day, Christmas Eve, and/or a floating holiday Provisions Dover Peers Holidays Offered New Year’s Day X 100% Martin Luther King Jr. Day X 100% President’s Day X 78% Memorial Day X 100% Independence Day X 100% Labor Day X 100% Columbus Day 33% Veteran’s Day X 89% Thanksgiving X 100% Day after Thanksgiving X 100% Christmas Eve 67% Christmas Day X 100% General Election Day, Good Friday, Other Good Friday Returns Day and New Year’s Eve Total/Average 11 12 Floating Holiday Offered No 60% 41

I. Benefits Assessment Details Time Off Benefits: Vacation • Dover is highly competitive when compared to their peers, as they offer among the most vacation days for employees across all years of service. It is common practice amongst peers and at Dover to provide vacation days instead of a combination paid time off plan • Most peers (60%) provide personal days. Currently, the City of Dover is not competitive as personal days are not provided to employees, although it makes up for it with vacation days Provisions Dover Peers Time Off Policy Vacation Days Yes 100% Paid Time Off No 0% Number of Days by Years of Service 1-5 Years 15 12 6-10 Years 21 16 11-15 Years 21 19 16-20 Years 24 22 20+ Years 27 23 Personal Days Offered No 60% 42

I. Benefits Assessment Details Time Off Benefits: Sick Days and Leave • Dover offers competitive parental leave as compared to their peers Provisions Dover Peers Sick Days Offered Yes 100% Maternity Leave Offered Yes 11% Provided to All Yes 100% Up to 6 months – Eligibility Details 12 weeks paid leave unpaid Paternity Leave Offered No 11% Provided to All N/A 100% Eligibility Details N/A 12 weeks paid leave 43

I. Benefits Assessment Details Other Benefits • Generally, Dover offers competitive programs for Employee Assistance, Tuition Reimbursement, and Wellness Programs Provisions Dover Peers Employee Assistance Program Offered Yes 89% Provided to All No 56% The most common program is Health/Advocate. Peers Details Health/Advocate use various third party vendors Tuition Reimbursement Offered Yes 56% Wellness Programs Offered Yes 56% 44

II. Individual Positioning Details Time in Position Placement – FOR IMPLEMENTATION ONLY • The table below presents Segal’s methodology to place incumbents in the appropriate salary within their range. Placement was determined solely on years in position and should be reviewed against recent performance evaluations and other criteria to be developed by the City Completed Year in Position Grade 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 $28,000 $28,700 $29,400 $30,100 $30,800 $31,500 $32,200 $32,900 $33,600 $34,300 $35,000 $35,613 $36,225 $36,838 $37,450 $38,063 2 $30,300 $31,058 $31,815 $32,573 $33,330 $34,088 $34,845 $35,603 $36,360 $37,118 $37,875 $38,538 $39,201 $39,863 $40,526 $41,189 3 $32,800 $33,620 $34,440 $35,260 $36,080 $36,900 $37,720 $38,540 $39,360 $40,180 $41,000 $41,718 $42,435 $43,153 $43,870 $44,588 4 $35,400 $36,285 $37,170 $38,055 $38,940 $39,825 $40,710 $41,595 $42,480 $43,365 $44,250 $45,024 $45,799 $46,573 $47,348 $48,122 5 $38,300 $39,258 $40,215 $41,173 $42,130 $43,088 $44,045 $45,003 $45,960 $46,918 $47,875 $48,713 $49,551 $50,388 $51,226 $52,064 6 $41,400 $42,435 $43,470 $44,505 $45,540 $46,575 $47,610 $48,645 $49,680 $50,715 $51,750 $52,656 $53,561 $54,467 $55,373 $56,278 7 $44,800 $45,920 $47,040 $48,160 $49,280 $50,400 $51,520 $52,640 $53,760 $54,880 $56,000 $56,980 $57,960 $58,940 $59,920 $60,900 8 $48,400 $49,610 $50,820 $52,030 $53,240 $54,450 $55,660 $56,870 $58,080 $59,290 $60,500 $61,559 $62,618 $63,676 $64,735 $65,794 9 $52,300 $53,608 $54,915 $56,223 $57,530 $58,838 $60,145 $61,453 $62,760 $64,068 $65,375 $66,519 $67,663 $68,807 $69,951 $71,095 10 $56,500 $57,913 $59,325 $60,738 $62,150 $63,563 $64,975 $66,388 $67,800 $69,213 $70,625 $71,861 $73,097 $74,333 $75,569 $76,805 11 $61,100 $62,628 $64,155 $65,683 $67,210 $68,738 $70,265 $71,793 $73,320 $74,848 $76,375 $77,712 $79,048 $80,385 $81,721 $83,058 12 $66,000 $67,650 $69,300 $70,950 $72,600 $74,250 $75,900 $77,550 $79,200 $80,850 $82,500 $83,944 $85,388 $86,831 $88,275 $89,719 13 $71,300 $73,083 $74,865 $76,648 $78,430 $80,213 $81,995 $83,778 $85,560 $87,343 $89,125 $90,685 $92,244 $93,804 $95,364 $96,923 14 $77,100 $79,028 $80,955 $82,883 $84,810 $86,738 $88,665 $90,593 $92,520 $94,448 $96,375 $98,062 $99,748 $101,435 $103,121 $104,808 15 $83,300 $85,383 $87,465 $89,548 $91,630 $93,713 $95,795 $97,878 $99,960 $102,043 $104,125 $105,947 $107,769 $109,592 $111,414 $113,236 16 $89,700 $91,943 $94,185 $96,428 $98,670 $100,913 $103,155 $105,398 $107,640 $109,883 $112,125 $114,087 $116,049 $118,012 $119,974 $121,936 • Between 0 and 10 years in position, an individual would receive a 2.5% increase to their salary. From 11 to 15 years in position, the incumbent would receive a 1.75% increase to base salary 45

III. Managing Individual Pay Option for Salary Structure Implementation • Once jobs are assigned to the salary structure, the next step is to determine where individual incumbents should be paid within their assigned range • While the structure provides some guidance for compensation in the form of defined ranges, individuals should be paid at various points within the range based on criteria such as: – Experience – Length of service – Expertise and content knowledge – Performance – Internal equity • Ideally, adjusting the current salary structure requires a thorough review of salaries and the appropriateness of individual pay positioning against the below elements: Minimum ¼ Mark Midpoint ¾ Mark Maximum 1st Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile • New to job • Will perform most job • Will perform all aspects of job • Expert in all job criteria responsibilities effectively effectively and independently • Has broad knowledge of own area • On learning curve, building both skills and knowledge as well as • Possesses all/most of the base • Experienced in the job and as well as related and system wide ability to handle job responsibilities knowledge and skill requirements, possesses required knowledge and areas but may need to build upon them skills • Depth and breadth of experience in through experience • Exhibits desired competencies to the job and specialized skills add • May still be learning some aspects perform job successfully significant value of job or developing expertise to • Seasoned and proficient at building • Will serve as expert resource handle them more independently job responsibilities and/or role model/mentor to others and effectively in similar jobs or to other areas • Exhibits most desired competencies to perform job successfully 46

MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM To, To: Hon Robin Christiansen, Hon. Robin Christiansen, Mayor Members of Maya! & Members Dave! City Council 0! Dover Council From: From: Thomas A. Johnson, Thomas Chief of Johnson, Jr., Chief of Police Police Date: Date: January 19, 2021 January 2021 Police Department Dovur Police Snbjact: Dover Subject: Deplnmant— (EWC) Smut Camera (BWC) Worn Camera - Body Worn Status BACKGROUND late May, in late In the issue May, 2020, the oi Police issue of iteiorm became Police Reform became a focal focal point ofof not Americans, but not only Americans, but in communities communities around around the the world. world. One One otthe many topics of the many topics involved involved in In these these ongoing ongoing discussions discussions is the is the thatcody Worn Cameras role that.Body role Cameras play in the the shift toward additional shirt toward addlliorial transparency. transparency The The Dover Police Police Department endorses the concept oithe Department endorses the concept of the Body Worn Camera Camera and has been monitoring the continued has been monitoring the continued development of development otthistechnology this technology for the past lor the past half-decade Department has half-decade. The Department has previewed the the produced by systems produced systems several manutacturers by several hastheframewolkola manufacturers and has the framework of a Policy already incorporated incorporated into into the Written directives system. There written directives system. There have been been indicators at both the both the State and Federall level and Federa level that suggest that suggest there there will he be subsidies subsidies made made availableto available to local municipallties municipalities to to acquire and deploy awc BWC devices, Those conversations continue as legislators devices. for the meet tor legislators meet first session the first oi 2021 session of 2021. purpose of The purpose olthis Memorandum is to inform this Memorandum micro. the the othcrals oithe officials of olooverthe city of the City recommendation Dover the recommendation nf the of Police Department Dover Police the Dover Department should should a decision decision he be made made to to proceed to to a iaody Body Warn Worn Camera Camera program without delay. Itit should program without should be he noted that the noted that the following iniormation represents iollowing information departure represents a departure from this recommendation positlon on this our original position from our following the recommendation railowing field the field testing ofoi Coban Cohan BWC technology. In Cohan does in short, Coban the products and have the does not have support the services necessary to support and services necessary the BWC requirements requirements of oithe Dover Police Department, Dover Police The cameras Department. The cameras do do not function function long enough or well enough toto support patrol officers. support patrol officers. The overall system increases the overall system the worltioad workload ofoi involved involved employees heyond reasonable beyond reasonable levels levels and and the suhware package th e software package lacks lacks the necessary the necessary functions functions to manage the to manage the video files errectiveiy video Cohan also continues to effectively. Coban to struggle struggle With interoperabilityof the inter-operability with the of its own own products. or TECHNOLOGY COMPARISONOF COMPARISON TECHNOLOGV there has communication. there prior communication, in prior In has been outline of been a comparative outline available technology that of available that included included equipment horn COBAN, AXON, equipment from Aon, and and WATCHGUARD. For reasons that referenced in the will be relerehced that wlll iii the following sections, following sections, it has has become become clear clear to us that Mon/Taser to us that Axon/Taser is is the the only sensible sensible choice choice for for the the Dover Dover

Page 22 of Page a or 3 Police Department Department at this this current time. Cooan current point in time. has continued Coban has the reliab to fail the continued to reliability, compatibility compatibility and efficiency lest, Watchguard efficiency test. Watchgua rd has has carved carved out a small small share share ottlie DELMARVA of the DELMARVA market market but they but th more expensive and are more ey are and do the capacity to have the do not have other inter-related to help solve other challenges inter-related challenges at data of data coll collection and the desire and the desire toto leverage every every avenue of accountability for for operations. operations. it It does does offer “neuromuscular Iflcapacllatlon" not offer a " neuromuscular incapacitation" or “conducted "conducted energy” energy" device device in its its product product line line lor for comparison comparison or bundled bundled cost cost savings savings considerations. considerations. For For these these reasons, reasons, and and due due the continued to the to continued superior lound during results found superior results every reference during every check, in and reference check, out of and out of Delaware, Delaware, ourourtocus focus has been to has been to the quickest and frind the and most cost-effective costseffectlve path to to bring bringthe Axon product product to Dover. Dover. STAFFING couleEmfiloNs STAFFING CONSIDERATIONS stated on prior As stated As occasions, Dover PD is prior occasions, open to is open the concept to the concept of When staff of civilian staff performing the function the function 0! BWC system maintenance of maintenance so inng long as thethe 'lndlviduil[s) possess law individual(s) possess law enforcement sophistication. enforcement sophistication. that in mind, With that With in revised recommendation mind, our revised recommendation is to is to begin with addition at the addition with the full-time of a fu Evidence ll-time Evidence Manager to Manager workload of the workload absorb the to absorb the BWC oi the awc program program as well direct oversight to well as provide direct to the the Evidence Technician Evidence Technician position. Our Clurcontinued research research has has revealed revealed to usthat the to us maintenance at the maintenance of files is BWC files BWC is more ofof an evidence ratherflian function rather evidence function IT roie, Therefme; than an IT role. instead of Therefore; instead LAN analyst, of a LAN ana the Evidence the Manager Evidence Manager position (attached) was (attached) was submitted submitted to to the the current current FVZZ FY22 budget budget development development This new cycle. This new position track to stlil on track is still position is under the to fall under the Office Office of Prufzssional Standards of Professional within the Standards Withlli the chain of agency chain agency of command command. As bath the As both the Evidence Technician and Evidence Technician and the the Evidence would be Manager would Evidence Manager be cross cross trained trained in all all evidence evidence duties, including duties, Including the the new nwc system, BWC system, the the concept concept or of an additional additional part- time position time position might might bebe premature. premature. If the workload If the workload proves consistently beyond the proves to be consistently of capacity of the capacity the proposed the the part-time model, the staffing model, proposed staffing panrtime position cou could considered in be considered ld be inthe fut future, ure. RECOMMENDATION ENDATION immediate implementation, For immediate For implementation, the updated recommendation the updated recommendation is is that that funds oe authorized funds be authorized forlor purchase of purchase ewe solution the BWC af the ofleled by AXON/TASER solution offered savings offered by Cooan perceived cost savings AXON/TASER. The perceived Coban quickly disappeared after mapping out disappeared after the wortflow out the workflow through all or all of our mandated processes. For the mandated processes. the loreseeable future, foreseeable ruture, it it is is assessed assessed that that the the Cuban Caban dash cams cams and and interview room room devices devices wi|| will serve serve theirintended their purpose. Intended purpose. At some some point, when when practical practical and and economical, economical, there there is is a likelihood likelihood thatthe that the Axon version Axon or dash and room version of room cameras cameras will bebe obtained achieve maximum efficiency obtained to achieve efficiency in thethe zone of video evidence, of video evidence. Add itionally, during the the most recent most recent period of of law: research, BWC research, certain certain lacts facts came to light to our existing light regarding our devices which are part of Taser devices existing laser the Axon product line. of the while negotiating While tor the negotiating for the best irest possible possioie pricing and payment payment terms, we became aware of terms, we of several facts facts and lactors and factors relevant the BWC proiect relevant to the Taser program. project and our existing laser the availability included the This included program. This ability or updated of updated Taser devices, common sense interoperability oi devices, common sense inter-operability of Axon products, improved accountability controls and the controls the introduction virtual reality training system to introduction of a virtual Officers fat prepare nfficers to prepare the when the for when raser isis being considered laser "aerisk" individuals. situations involving "at-risk" considered in situations individuals. while there has oeen While there been no official official announcement made, announcement made, Axon Axon is is on track track to eliminate eliminate the the option oi option of buying their Taser their laser products in individual individual units. traditional model This traditional units. Th model has has led to chronic problem of gaps to a chronic device maintenance gaps in device maintenance that have that have impacted risk management management concerns introducing, and concerns. They are introducing, and will to, eventually migrate to, will eventually

Page 3 Page ol 1 3of3 "Certification” or a "Certification" ”Suhscrlptlnn" program. or "Subscription" This program program. This oithe basically pull all of program will basically the separately separately priced components priced components of at the the Taser system bundled subscription system into a bundled subscription system. system. it purchased If this time, purchased at this hve (5) time, as a five lSl year held personnel package, all Dover PD field year package, receive the would receive personnel would the newest version of newest version of both the Body Worn Camera both the Camera and Taser Taser technology. included in the technology. Included price per the price per bundle would device bundle device would bebe all associated including holsters, dutv equipment including associated equipment cartridges, tralnlng duty cartridges, training replacement cartridges following cartridges, replacement tollowing use, batteries, cameras, use, batteries, vouchers hardware, vouchers computer hardware, cameras, computer for all required instructor for instructor training, a live-action live-action training suit the agency, for the suit for agency, warranty coverage, and warranty coverage, of the all of the new new virtual-reality vinnal»rea|ity training available trainlng avai the package timeline. duting the lable during timeline. The program program and cost estimates are estimates are contained contained in the the attached attached presentation presentation. For the the five year year package, they have they also have also agreed toto hack-load the combined back-load the combined payment that the payment plan so that first year the first roughly 8% of year costs are roughly ofthe tutal cost of total of approximately approximately $759,500 $799,900. Other facts Other facts relevant relevant to this recommendation to this recommendation are the the pending purchases of ot needed needed Taser supplies set 2021. We are preparing a purchase order to occur in early 2021. to order for for $18,000 $20,000 worth $13,000 - $10,000 worth of oicarlridges, cartridges, batteries batteries and and other supplies. other supplies. Also Also at of note, a little little less less than halfol than half of our Taser devices Taser devices will be be out of out of warranty in warranty and most of 2011 and in early 2021 oi the the remaining remaining ones will expireexpire in early 2022 Tasers out of 2022. Tasers of tun-price replacement, warranty are a full-price warranty replacement. One One example of the accountability upgrade would of the would be be the the automatic the BWC of the activation of automatic activation law: when the new when the version of new version Taser and/or of Teser the issued and/or the issued firearm firearm is removed is removed from its from its holster, one holster. One example of the the improved access access to data data is is the the automatic automatic uploading oi of all information directly from discharge information discharge the smart train the smart battery battery toto the the office at Professional Office of standards. Professional Standards. Neither of Neither these wou of these automated if we wnuld be automated if we were pvaceed without were to proceed without this cnmhined offer. this combined offer. The attached presentation contalns many attached presentation contains many Ollie! other noteworthv noteworthy details. details. IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION the approval of upon the Upon of Dover City Council, thethe Dover Police Department Department wou would execute the the proposal offered and make Axon and offered by Axon make preparations preparations (or for delivery in July, 2021. Leading into the into the July the window, the window, Evidence Manage! can be Evidence Manager identified and be identified and all involved Sta" can go involved staff an thmugh through the the Axon training program training program that covers that the Officer covers the Ofil'rersufety The program Safety package. The program in thethe field tield would would begin as soon soon as the devices the devices received and were received were and ready fordeployment, ready for scenario, the deployment. In thisscenario, in Dover Police Department the Dover Department will continue continue seek funding seek lunding support support trom from any available available source, source, including the the Violent-Crimes Violent-Crimes Grant Grant which has historicallydetrayed historically the cost of defrayed the at the the raser resource. As Taser resource. structured, and referenced As currently structured, referenced earlier, the proposal the would reauire proposal would require 8% of the cost oi the cost paid in the in first year the first year and the remaining 92% and the equal 92% paid in equal portions starting portions starting in the the second second year year and and mnn'lng running through the the fifth fifth year. year. There There is some flexibility in some flexibility this proposed this schedule should proposed schedule should it be be necessary. necessary. Respectfully submitted. Respectfully submitted.

19/ 1/19/2021 BODTWDRNCAMERA BODYWORN CAMERA 2021 PROGRAM 2021 PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATION DOVERPOUCEDEPARTMENT BACKGROUND BACKGROUND decade has last decade The last has featured an ongoing call for expanded: for expanded: ' • Transparency •- Accountability •-Evidenh Evidentiary ProofI • Acquisition of emerging technologies within the criminal justice system and policing profession. 1

1/19/2011 1/19/2021 BACKGROUND BACKGROUND Camera (BWC) Body Worn Camera Body devices advance (EWC) devices advance all four (out of these pxiaxides an they: priorities as •- Offer unomez ofpoaanidem dimension of another dimension •. inuease me public‘l Increase the post-incident review confidence in police public's confidence police -~--- mechanisms accountability mechanisms accountability (13th and audio video and •- Capture video audio corroboration cmmbornmm of oi written reports • Increase the effectiveness of policing priorities COBAN TECHNOLOGIES ‘AN BUSTlNG *AN VENDOR EXISTING VENDOR . Currently car/inim-iaw room pmvideliin-car/interview Cunamly provides cunanu mam cameras - Itn was awc product theix BWC hoped that their wan hoped would: product would: -• iniegme wiih Euiiy integrate Easily with existing .ynenu existing systems • Improve internal processes • Save a substantial amount of money • lt did mmg of those things. 2

1/19/2021 AXON ENTERPRISE, AXON ENG ENTERPRISE, INC. CAMERA 3 BODY CAMERA 3 Cmnuy anjayl • Currently ohhe enjoys 80% of agency mariner large agency the large market the next lowest Was the lowelt quote quote {mm the 2020 survey from the survey vendor (Taser exufing vendor an existing • Was an (rarer program) Commonly the Consistently rim: often the most mommended flaw-ice alien recommended M device** • Met or exceeded all Dover Police requirements • Advantages in amaa not initially identified RECOMMENDATION •. City Council Council Approve the addition Approve the addnion of of one FTE to one (1) FTE to manage the program manage the program •' This esfimnle of {mm the original estimate Thin is a reduction from L5 FTE 0! 1.5 [hmfinalyu] PI'E [LAN Analyst] '• The position has also [aimed to be proved In be more of E‘vidanoa-xallled(Ill: of an Evidence-related task aridence Manager pmposed Evidence • The proposed ~ Manager would be be non-bargaining Mn-bugaimng and supervise :upervise the existing [n pasiiion. [FY 22 Evidence Technician position. Pexmmiel Request is :42 Personnel filed] in filed) he cross-trained poliliom would be Bum positions • Both ~ cmu-lmined to re handle non-supemwryluaks a.“ non-supervisory handle all tasks -CinC • City Council . iinpmmapmoxmekwmomwsueqmn Approve the purchase of the Axon/Taser Officer Safety Plan 7 • Complete five (5) year solution to agency BWC and Taser programmrequirements • Higheat pc,telllial available for achieving community satisfaction 3

1/ 19/ 2021 1/19/2021 EVIDENCE MANAGER POSITION EVIDENCE MANAGER POSITION TRADITIONAL EVIDENCE TRADITIONAL WORK EVIDENCEWORK WORN CAMERA BODY WORN CAMERA IMPACT (3019 DATA) (2019 PROJECTIONS lepmte transacuons 8.800 separate •- 6,600 transactions •- ~30 ~30 Amiva Officers per Active Officers per day as separate •- 66 umpom for sepnme transports for testing «smug 24-h“: days per ass 24-hour • 365 ~ per year year • 300+ separate court transfers Loooanda • ~ 11,000 BWC data dumps per year • 350+ investigative transfers • Each dump has 8-12 hrs. of files • OJ190ing inventory/audit tasks AXON/TASER AXON/ TASER OFFICER OFFICER SAFETY PLAN SAFETY PLAN WORN CAMERA BODY WORN 1 TASER 7 LATET (CM 3) GENERATION (CAM LATEST GENERATION 10 BWC INTEGRATEDTO INTEGRATED EWC Impmvedvideo •- Improved Images Video Images • mime. ~ awe upon Activates BWC upon deployment Enhanced Audio Capture -• Enhanced Clplule •- Additional m use opc'om for Additional options • Automatic Activation Options • Integrated GPS data ['respond') ammgshn •' Smart voltage technology • Mora accurate device • Advanced Oversight Capability • Automated technology 4

1/19/2011 1/19/2021 does the how does 50 how Question: So the Dover Taser Program Dover PD Taser Program bbecome part Camera presentation? the Body Worn Camera part of the Answer: Answer: While researching the While the Axon BWC product. certain product, the facts came to light about the certain facts between our rel fionshi between relationship Energy Device our Conducted Energy Device (CED) program and the proposed BWC program. MODEL X-26 TASER MODEL TASER X-ZG Tm: was This the original wal the iswad to Olhcexl. device issued vaginal device Officers. Axon dimmmued discontinued itn amluld 2014‘ around 2014. Itn is luppmsfl with parts/service. longer supported in no longer pam/uewice. Very . ,wwmhainnnam m, few remain at Dover PD. 5

19/ 2011 1/19/2021 X—26-P TASER MODEL X-26-P m. n the This is mm ma cunent device innadm device issued Oflicen. to Officers. in. better technology u has better It alien. sham adjunablaenergy effect. technology & adjustable Mmommunnammmumdame. Most Officers at Dover PD carry this device. Most will be beyond warranty by 2022. X—26-P TASER MODEL X-26-P __ ___.,,,._... --··------·--" ..._.. n is It weameppmut and in more weather-proof and has reduced voltage. reduced voltage. --_ ______.,,, 'nu': device is generally This man isin conflicting There lea effective. generallyless comma research data email. Mlymnatulcedinu‘ainmmduof May eflective. in prim. print. have resulted in the increased UOF --------111 _------ --_____ .., {Unintended Consequence) - 6

15/ 2021 1/19/2021 TASER MODELT-7 T-'Z 1“: wireless I! has It Whale" connection connection to BWC. BWC. device adjusts Thil device This adjusts energy the pmbes. energy to the probes. ha- guwm-u‘c It has under. in/uuz data transfer. automatic in/out Also integrates to our rep orting software. [BlueTeam, lAPro] TASER MODELT-7 T—7 due to Avoids close smooo in 10 $20,000 in x-ze-p-xemed mu X-26-P-related costs pending in Iaxumry pending in o! 2021 (banana/cartridge!) January of (batteries/cartridges) x-zs-P on X-26-P euly end cm track to early at Lila. and of life. Walk Axon migrating toward subscription model. Also migrating back to the 'two cartridge' model 7

1/19/2021 AXON BODY CAMERA 3 Reduced Motion Reduced Molion Blurring Blurring Enhanced Low-light Enhanced Low-light performance Live-stream Live-stream capabilities has 4 microphones Now has micmphonea for better (01 b audio etter audio AXON BODY CAMERA 3 Comes with Comes blue tooth Wilh a blue tooth device device m an. mumqmdfor each climax] (Hand-held officer] Wireless real-time Wireless real-time connection connection to Taser 7 autoictivme capabilities Wireless auto-activate Wireless capabilities Multiple mans Multiple mounting options 8

1/19/2021 AXON/TASER OFFICER AXON/TASER SAFETY PLAN OFFICER SAFETY PLAN •El Begins the merger Begins with the oi the merger of the existing Taser and pending existing Tasez pending Body Camera programs Worn Camera ping-rams • Includes a five-year D Includes all devices package - covers all five-year package accessories devices & accessories • Cameras with Worn Cameras El 70 New Body Worn with two (2) sets scheduled of scheduled sets of replacement cameras (damage/iailures/upgndes) replacement (damage/failures/upgrades) [210 total] •D 85 35 NewT-7 Tuners with T—7 Tasers wiIh replacement Tum (damage/failures) replacement Tasers (damage/(angles) ' • ,Device Docking Stations, cCables ,and A“ . » Replacement n. Batteries 1 ( • Replacement Training .in.d: Duty Taser Cartridges [Unlimited] AXON/TASER OFFICER AXON/TASER SAFETY PLAN OFFICER SAFETY PLAN •D Concurrent Concurrent unlimited subscription to unlimited subscription data storage to data via Evidence.cam via Evidence.com •D All training-related necessities training-related necessities •C] Full-body Taser training suit hill-body Taser suit mi •El Instructor User training Online User Instructor and Online ' System • Virtual geslfiy 1 1 Reality Training tern • Equipment & Current/Future software • Vi ·cl~ hardware for data transfer and cti,vation 9

1/19/1021 1/19/2021 AXON/TASER OFFICER SAFETY PLAN AXON/TASEROFFICERSAFETYPLAN AXON EVIDENCE.COM AXON EVIDENCE.COM VIRTUAL REALITY REAHTYTRAIN'ENG TRAINING Suppon •- Complete DPD File Support -• Schizophrenia Schizophrenia Desktop/Mobile Integration •- Desktop/Mobile Integxation •- Suicidal Suicidal Ideafion Ideation mil: (Digital) •- Audit Trails (Digital) • Autism ~ tad Rad • Automated ' Redaction -• Hud olHeIxinfl Hard of Hearing • Automated File Identification • Peer InteIVention (pending) • Connection to Attorney General AXON/TASER OFFICER AXON/TASER OFFICER SAFETY PLAN •El Total Cost Cost of Officer Safety Plan 379933010 Over Plan is $799,930.10 over 5 yrs. yrs. •El Back-loaded Back-loaded (Covid-19) (Covid-19) payment plan •DYeax 8% or $63,944.70 (can be Year 1 is 8% 1 deferred 90 days) be deferred •DYeaxs are equally Years 2Z - 5 are divided at $183,996.35 equally divided $183,996.85 per per year year •CI Effective "out-clause" language Efiective "out-clause" funding threatened language if funding threatened • Some program costs may still gee be eligible for grant funding « . • Remaining costs in support of X-26-P will be either defra: d or eliminated 10

1/19/1021 1/19/2021 EVIDENCE EVIDENCE MANAGER POSITION MANAGER POSITION 'lbtal Cost U Total D Cost of Evidence Manage! is Evidence Manager aver 5 years is $357,572.00 over years •El $69,274.00 in FY 22 $69,214.00 in •D $80,236.00 380336.00 by FYFY26 D A part-time position may be necessary in the future should workload exceed current projections OVERALL VALUE TO OVERALL TO DOVER DOVER •- A demnnatxated commitment to industry best practice: demonstrated commitment practices Ownerlhip of leading-edge •- Ownership technology in multiple leading—edge technology categones multiple categories Improved organizational •- Improved eficiency in case organizational efficiency management caae management •- Meeting stakeholder expectations Meeting stakeholder entomement 21n Century law enforcement expectationa in 21st • Cost consolidation at a strategic moment [I• C en awe, 3"' Cen Taser,COVID pricing) • Multi-disciplinary approach to better outcomes following force application "'l'raildilg ~ 0Dliile, Live) "Teohllol9gy (intez-openhility) *Ovenighl (random. lffllDl) 11 11

1/19/2021 RISK MANAGEMENT under warranty •- Taser units not under longer have warranty no longer have the the Axon coverage insurance coverage •- l10 occurrence 1! per occurrence OMillion per hum is related if harm Iniluza related to product failure Traveler's Insurance Information from Txaveler's •‘ Information Insurance Company “,1 .. related lawsuits are now Taser deployments • Most use-of-force • More than all other less-lethal events combined THE BOTTOM LINE •' The cost of the the Axon BWC, by yrs., is just under we! 5 y'rs., by itself, over $293,000 under $293,000 •' Historical Historical data Tm: X-ZG-P our Taser projacls our daka projects cogs, over X-26-P costs, ave! 5 yrs., ave! $130,000 y'n., is over incorporate the Axon BWC, withaut aside. to incorporate stifling aside, ‘• Staffing OSP, is $433,000 without USP, $423,000 • The basic difference between the two approaches is appox. $377,000 • Historical data shows there is grant money available to defray Taser costs • Grant dollars ue potentially available for BWC technology as well 12

1/19/2021 THE BOTTOM LINE omcer Safety •- The Officer upgrade delivers me Program upgrade Safety Program {clluwingz the following: •' A bener. Imaner. more better, smarter, canducted energy maze humane conducted device (CED) *' energy device ** •- Mini-med alsunnce that Taser uses are Automated assurance are captured vi- BWC cupiuxed via EWC ieanueu features minus leaving the assurance that Firearms •- Automated assurance Ihe holster are captured captured as well •- Auiomaieul nwc activation Automated BWC parameters via vehicle acuvau’on parameters installed signal uuii vehicle installed unit mamlnx Links room •- Little lubility buck yum to deflect liability for Axon oinaver in the City of back to [w-muuy]J Dover [Warranty • A giant stride forwud in training capability for CED (At-risk populations) MON/THEIR OFFERS AXON/TASER MOST COMPLETE THE MOST THE COMPLETE ems SOLUTIONTO THE BODY SOLUTION WORN CAMERA WORN CAMERA NEEDS NEEDS OF OF THE DOVER POLICE. DOVER POLICE. The“0fhcex The vlhle in Sum, Plan" has value "Officer Safety I“ deliver] olpmen dilecl delivery (he direct the of proven BWC W!“ as lechxmlogy as well technology an indirect a: the ind-lien bemiiu \c Firm] Invafliglllom‘ benefits to Patrol, investigations, Adi-mumm-and Taming, Administration Training, Ind Professional Standards through it's 13 13

Dover Police Dept. - DE AXON SALES REPRESENTATIVE Roscoe Brown 6106204681 rbrown@axon.com ISSUED 1/16/2021 Q-283589-44212.027RB 1

(Mann—«212.021» Q-283589-44212.027RB Axnn Enhmfiso. Axon Enterprise, Inc. new NN 85th 17800 can 51 Sl Somali-10‘ Anmna 85255 Scottsdale, Arizona 35255 mm hymem Terms: N21 Payment Net 30 Ems UNM States United New PM Delivery Method: Fedex -EGMM Deflvuy Ground Pm Phone: (BOO) 0732731 (800) 976-2737 ms: xsrxasunnv: SALES REPRESENTATIVE R0550: Brown Roscoe Brawn To SHIP TO SHIP BILLTO BILL TO mm. mm Dewar Police Dover Dept. A- DE Puma mam. Phone: 6106204681 mvwmwn mm EmII rbrO\vn@axon.com Email: nowrvoliu Dover Police n-pI DE Dept. - DE 4005S QUEEN ST 400 "x Fax: s ouEEN 400 S 400 QUEEN ST DE 19904 DOVER. DE 19904 DOVER,DE19$DA DOVER, us DE 19904 mm" mm” PRIMARY CONTACT us my» Phone· EmaII Email: Velr Year11 - USP OSP77 Tenn UstUnH lblm Descdption Quantity Net UnH Price Total(USO) (Months) Price Axon Plana & Packages 73746 PROFESSIONAL EVIDENCE PROFESSIONAL LIcENsE DOM LICENSE EVIDENCE.COM 60 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 UNLIMITED Aon EVIDENOECOM UNLIMITED EVIDENCE.COM AXON DEVICE DEVICE mac 73686 moms STORAGE “‘7 60 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 ms: 73683 GE EwaENcE 10 GB A-wcARr STORAGE com A-LA-CART EVIDENCE.COM so 60 mu 700 0.00 0.00 0.00 mm 20248 EvaNcEcoN ACCESS LICENSE TASER 7 EVIDENCE.COM 00 60 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 73445 73449 RESPOND DEVICE RESPOND ucENsE DEVICE LICENSE 30 60 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 um swmnns 73638 AccEss LICENSE STANDARDS ACCESS ucENsE on 60 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 2”” use: am mamnss REPLACEMENT TASER 7 DUTY CARTRIDGE REPLACEMENT 20246 9° 60 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 LICENSE ACCESS LICENSE 13w 73687 EVIDENCE cw VIEWER LICENSE EVIDENCE.COM VIEWER LICENSE no 60 0.00 0.00 0.00 20245 20248 TASER 7 EVIDENCE TASER com ACCESS LICENSE EVIDENCE.COM LIcENsE an 60 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 7353: 73683 as SYWGE A-LACART STORAGE EVIDENCECOM A-LA-CART 10 GB EVIDENCE.COM so 60 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 73746 PROFESSIONAL EVIDENCE coM LICENSE EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE 60 60 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 IHardware TASEN 77 HOLSTER TASER HOLSTER ·- SAFARILAND, NNocARI SAFARILAND, RH+CART 20160 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 CARRIER CARRIER 7sm5 75015 SIGNAL SIDEANM SIGNAL KII SIDEARM KIT m 70 0.00 0 0.00 w o0.00 20050 20050 NOOMND-LODP TRAINING (HAL HOOK-AND-LOOP (NALr) sun TI SUIT 1I um 0.00 mm 0.00 (100 0.00 Q-283181..421Z.027RB 2

Year1 •-osp7 OSP 7 (Cominuod) (Continued) Tenn Uet Unit Net Unit Price Total(USD) 111m OMcrlptlon Quantity (llonths) Price Hardware Continued) TASER 7 HANDLE, HANDLE. YLW, men VISIBILITY YLW. HIGH WSVBILITV “ma 20008 (GREEN usERL (GREEN LASER), cuss CLASS 3R 3R 7° 70 °0.00 ”‘7 ”‘7 0.00 °0.00 no mo 20040 YASER 7 HANDLE TASER HANDLE WARRANTY, LYEAR WARRANTY, 4-YEAR 7!: 70 um 0.00 um 0.00 Mu 0.00 7:202 73202 new 3 -, «Am AXON BODY 3 NA10 7a 70 can no 69900 n on 0.00 a nu 0.00 CARTRIDGE, swamps WE CARTRIDGE. 7 LIVE (15 22175 22175 TASER 7 DEGREE) N5 DEGREE) NS STANDOFF (3.5- am 210 am 0.00 no 0.00 om 0.00 YASER 77 LIVE LIVE CARTRIDGE, CLOSE CARTRIDGE, CLOSE ””6 22176 TASER QUARTERS (12-0EGREE) QUARTERS Ms (12-DEGREE) NS 2‘" 210 n m 0.00 a “a 0.00 u u“ 0.00 2117B 22179 usER 71INERT TASER s'rmnor; CARTRIDGE, STANDOFF INERT CARTRIDGE, so 50 am 0.00 u.un 0.00 um 0.00 (”DEGREE (3.5-0EGREE) NS NS ”‘5‘ 22181 use»; mmmeg mass ME" CARTRIDGE, CLOSE TASER 7 INERT 5" 50 °W 0.00 °W 0.00 °W 0.00 QUARTERS (12-0EGREE) QUARTERS (VZADEGREE) NS 71cm 71044 BATTERY, SIGNAL BATTERY. swam cm SIGNAL SIDEARM, CR2430 140 140 um 0.00 um 0.00 um 0.00 5mm: SINGLE PACK ma: 70033 WALL MOUNT WALL smchr‘ ASSY. MOUNT BRACKET, ASSY, 9s an 43.90 4390 43.90 (a 395.10 EVIDENCE DOCK EVIDENCE.COM DOCK 742m 74210 aonvs- Axon BODY AXON an 3 • 6a BAY DOCK 9 meme 1,495.00 n no 0.00 we 0.00 22775 22175 TAsER TASER 77 LIVE LIVE CARTRIDGE smmoFF As CARTRIDGE, STANDOFF Er (3.5- 740 140 n no 0.00 n an 0.00 a on 0.00 DEGREE NS DEGREE) NS 22"“ 22176 visa: 7 LIVE TASER 7 CARTRIDGE, cLosE LIVE CARTRIDGE, CLOSE “° 140 °°° 0.00 ““7 0.00 M“ 0.00 OUARTERS (12-DEGREE) QUARTERS NS (12-DEGREE) NS noomumoow TRN (HALT) TASER 7 HOOK-AND-LOOP MALT} “a TASER 22177 us STANDOFF NS CARTRIDGE STANDOFF CARTRIDGE, no 140 0.00 n m 0.00 D "‘7 0.00 2217:: 22178 "Wows? mu (HALT) LASER 7 HOOK-ANQ..LOOP TRN TASER cum“ NS CLOSE QUART CARTRIDGE CLOSE CARTRIDGE, NS (mm W 140 ° no 0.00 " °° 0.00 ” W 0.00 2nms 20018 use»: mmERv PACK, TASER 7 BATTERY PACK, YAC'HCAL TACTICAL m 84 a0.00 an n w 0.00 n on 0.00 207141 20041 Vain” a ”‘3me "W 4• TASER 7 BATTERY PACK WARRANTY, YEAR "‘ u 84 000 0.00 am 0.00 mm 0.00 mm 20042 TASER 77 DOCK & TASER wmwm‘ CORE WARRANTY, + L CORE 4- 1 o m 0.00 n no 0.00 um 0.00 YEAR 7mm 70033 WALL mum smKEr. ASSY‘ WALL MOUNT BRACKET, ASSY, 1 1 nos 0.00 0.00 on um 0.00 EVIDENcEch nocx EVIDENCE.COM DOCK 742m 74200 man mm TASER 77 6-BAY DOCK DOCK ANO CORE AND CORE I1 a an 0.00 o0.00 no n no 0.00 YARGETFRAME TARGET PROFESSIONAL, 27.5 IN FRAME, PROFESSIONAL, x IN. X ”we" 80090 75 IN., 75 m.. TASER 7 ‘1 W" 0.00 °'°° 0.00 ”‘7 0.00 71534 11534 usa-c to USB-C usmcame FOR m USB-A CABLE A33 0R FOR AB3 OR FLEX 2 70 a an 0.00 a an 0.00 n no 0.00 Mouun FLEXIBLE, MAGNEr MOUNT, MAGNET FLEXIBLE, AXON "”2” 74020 RAPIDLOCK RAPIDLOCK 17 77 n no 0.00 nm 0.00 o0.00 7am 70112 AXON svemL AXON um SIGNAL UNIT 15 15 277 no 279.00 m 279.00 as 4,185.00 no 74200 74200 m7 nocxmn 7AsER 7 6-BAY DOCK TASER AND cmE CORE 2 2 man on 1,500.00 1.5mm 1,500.00 moo no 3,000,00

Vw1-osp1qcomm Year 1 - OSP 7 (Continued) Tenn Lr.t Unit Net Unit Price Total(U80) Item DNcrlpllon Quantity (llontll9) Price Hardware Continued 20042 “Sim not.” mzwmamw‘ 4. TASER 7 DOCK & CORE WARRANTY, 4- 2 300.00 300.00 600.00 YEAR Other 73946 OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 7 BUNDLE HEADER 60 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 73958 OFFICER SAFETY Pl.AN 7 PAYMENT 12 70 1,908.00 299.78 20,984.60 73827 AB3 CAMERA TAP WARRANTY 60 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 73828 AB3 8 BAY DOCK TAP WARRANTY 60 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 20120 TASER 7 INSTRUCTOR COURSE VOUCHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 TASER 7 MASTER INSTRUCTOR SCHOOL 20119 0.00 0.00 0.00 VOUCHER TASER 7 TARGET, CONDUCTIVE, 80087 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROFESSIONAL (RUGGEOIZED) NORTH AMER POWER NORTH can: re: L An: 8- POWER CORD FOR AB3 71019 m m ”mum Doox BAY, AB2 1-BAY I 6-BAY DOCK EVIDENCE.COM PROFESSIONAL LICENSE 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 73837 12 10 468.00 468.00 4,680.00 PAYMENT 20270 HTC FOCUS+ VIRTUAL REALITY HEADSET 3 999.00 0.00 0.00 20271 AXON VR CONTROLLER KJT 0.00 0.00 0.00 ServlcN 85144 AXON STARTER 2,750.00 2,750.00 2,750.00 85147 CEWSTARTER 2,750.00 2,750.00 2,750.00 80129 susm on ROUTER ONLYOR SIGNAL ONLY RWTER ONLY ONLY 15 250.00 250.00 3,750.00 msnuumuu PER INSTALLATION vEnIcLE PER VEHICLE VIRTUAL REALITY TRAINING (51-100) 20384 60 0.00 0.00 0.00 LICENSE VIRTUAL REALITY TRAINING VIRTUAL REALITY (61-100) TRAINING (51-100) 20385 12 13,680.00 10,500.00 10,500.00 PAYMENY PAYMENT Subtotal 53,594.70 Estimated 0.00 Shipping Estimated Tax 0.00 Total 53,594.70 Q-2831189 H212.027RB 4

Volr11 --17cm Year T7 Cert Tenn List Unit Nit Unit Pltce Total(UID) 1111111 DHcripllon lllonthal QuanlltJ Price Axon Plana & Packallff 20246 ussfi 1 EWDENCECOM TASER 7 LIcEIIsE EVlDENCE.COM ACCESS LICENSE 60 15 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 20240 20246 mm? 17 DUTV TASER REPLACEMENY CARTRIDGE REPLACEMENT DUTY CARTRIDGE 60 15 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 LICENSE ACCESS LICENSE 20246 THE? 7LEVIDENCE TASER EVIDENCE com ucENsE COM ACCESS LICENSE 60 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 Hardware TASER 1 TASER smxamo. HOLSTER .. SAFARILAND, 7 HOLSTER 000 000 one 20150 chuu amen 20160 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 RH+CART CARRIER nus 22175 ImEIuLIVE TASER amino: sunnorr (as 7 LIVE CARTRIDGE, STANDOFF (3.5- 45 0,00 0.00 am 0.00 0.00 nEanEE) us DEGREE)NS YASER 77 LIVE TASER cLosE CARTRIDGE. CLOSE LIVE CARTRIDGE, um 221 76 mamas QUARTERS (12-DEGREE) (12—DEGREEDNS 45 0.00 0.00 0.00 20008 20006 imam, TASER 7 VLw, HIGH HANDLE, YLW, VIsIqurv HIGH VlSIBIUTY 15 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 cuss wen). CLASS 3R (GREEN LASER), an 20040 user; TASER 1 WARRANTY, HEAR 7 HANDLE WARRANTV. 4-YEAR 15 0.00 a an 0.00 a an 0.00 22m 22179 usEa 7 INERT CARTRIDGE, TASER 7mg” SYMBOFF CARTRIDGE. STANDOFF 1s 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (is-DEGREE) NS (3.6-DEGREEJ Ms 221m 22161 cunmueE. CLOSE IMERT CARTRIDGE, TASER 7 INERT 15 a on 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 museum QUARTERS (12-DEGREE) NS QUARTERS NS 2115 22175 1% TASER 77WE usenzafls I: s. SYANDOFF (3.5- CARTRIDGE, STANDOFF LIVE CARTRIDGE, DEGREE) NS 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22170 22176 nsER 7 LIVE TASER CARTRIDGE. CLOSE LIVE CARTRIDGE, 30 0.00 00 u an 0.00 mm 0.00 ouAmERs (IzoonEEI NS 5(me QUARTERS (12-DEGREE) NS may 0W TASER 7 HOOK-ANO-LOOP TRN TRN (HALT) (HALT) 22117 22177 30 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 srmnarF NS CARTRIDGE, STANDOFF NS 22175 22 176 nssa HocKMIMuoP TRN TASER 77 HOOK-AND-LOOP mu (HALT) (mm 30 000 0.00 0,00 0.00 00.00 an mum NS CLOSE QUART CARTRIDGE. CLOSE CARTRIDGE, NS 20010 20018 nsER 77 BATTERY TASER mm ucnw BUMTERV PACK, TACTICAL I! 18 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20041 20041 use: aArrERv PACK TASER 77 BATTERY wmmrrv. 4- PACK WARRANTY, 47 «a 18 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 van YEAR 2004: 20042 usea poem TASER 71 DOCK & CORE COREWARRMHV. 4« WARRANTY, 4- 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 YEAR YEAR WALL MOUNT WALL BRACKET. Assv. MOUNY BRACKET. ASSY, 70033 1 000 0.00 a an 0.00 an 0.00 EVIDENCE mock COM DOCK EVlDENCE.COM 74200 74200 rAsER 71 LMY TASER DOEK AND CORE 6-BAY DOCK CORE 1 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 • Q-2113189 44212.027R8 II

Yuri1 -.17 Year cm (Continued) T7 Cert (Continued) Tenn LiltUnlt Net Unit Price Total (USD) Ham DNcrlptlon (Montha) Quantity Pllce Hardware Continued) TARGET YARGEY FRAME, PROFESSIONAL 27.5 IN FRAME. PROFESSIONAL, x IN. X 80090 1 a no 0.00 u m1 0.00 000 0.00 75 75 IN IN., usER TASER 7 mm awrlcmou 1135M7 CERTIFICATION BUNDLE TASER HEADER BUNDLE HEADER so 60 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 TASER 7 CERTIFICATION TASER CERTIFICATION BUNDLE BUNDLE 20437 20437 PAYMENT PAYMENT «2 12 \5 15 seem 690.00 ssouu 690.00 10.35000 10,350.00 an» Not Eligible TASER 1 I N~~~~~o Not 1W0 R owns: MEN Wong Eligible 153E“ R COURSE VOUCHER 7INSTRUCTOR TASER 7 OOURSE INSTRUCTOR COURSE 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 VOUGHER VOUCHER Nm Eligible Not gimme TASER 77 MASTER Not MASTER Nal Eligible mern mswucmw YASER 7 MASTER INSTRUCTOR Ewg‘bk TASER 1 am 0.00 000 0.00 one 0.00 swoon. INsrRucro SCHOOL INSTRUCTO VOUCHER VOUCHER R scHooL RSCHOOL vouc vouc Ellalnh Mm Eligible Not m mam-mm Mus: Halt Suit Not Eligible Halt Suit 1v am 0.00 on 0.00 non 0.00 TASER 77 TARGET, TARGET. CONDUCTIVE, CONDUCHVE‘ my 80087 TASER musesmzsm PROFESSIONAL (RUGGEDIZED) PROFESSIONAL 1 1 a0.00 no 00.00 on u on 0.00 sum-I Subtotal 15,350.00 10,350.00 m bum-Ind Tax Estimated u m 0.00 Tm Total 30735an 10,350.00 Spares Tenn U.t Unit Net Unit Price T01al(U8D) Ham DNcrlptlon (Monthl) Quantity Price Hardware “$5 2m (GREEN 20008 TASER YLW. HIGH VlSIllUTV LE. YLW, 7 HANDLE, (GREJMSEM cuss 3R LASER), CLASS a: VISIBILITY 2 om 0.00 Mo' 0.00 am ’ 0.00 73202 73202 sum 33- NA AXON BODY Nina 10 2 n nu 0.00 am 0.00 a no 0.00 new 20040 TASER 7 TASER Mums WARRANTY, 7 HANDLE ”EM WARRANTY.4-YEAR 2 0.00 am 0.00 am 0.00 11534 11534 usw use”: toIn USB-A CABLE USB-C run AB3 CABLE FOR on FLEX As: OR FLEX 2 2 u am 0.00 one 0.00 u 0.00 um Wk uawr. name. AXON MAGNET MOUNT, FLEXIBLE, AXON 74020 K RAPIDLOCK 2 Ma 0.00 moo 0.00 om 0.00 Q-283111 U212.027RB •

Spam (Continued) Spares (Cominuld) Tenn List Unit 111m Deectlptlon Quan1lty NetUnltl'llce Tolal(USO) (Months) Price Other 73w 73827 ABS CAMERA AB3 up wmmn CAMERA TAP WARRANTY ‘2 12 2 arm 0.00 mm 0.00 000 0.00 SW Subtotal we 0.00 Emma Tux Estimated Tax n0.00 on Tout Total om 0.00 YBII‘ Year2 2 Tenn u.tUnlt 1111m DNcllpllon Quantity Net Unit Pllce Tolal (USO) (Months) Price Hardware TASER 7 LIVE CARTRIDGE, STANDOFF (3.5- 22175 140 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEGREE) NS ””5 22 176 ass»! 77 LIVE TASER WE CARTRIDGE cLosE CARTRIDGE. CLOSE W 140 a no 0.00 °°° 0.00 °°° 0.00 QUARTERS (12-DEGREE) QUARTERS 1|}DEGREE) NS NS 22175 22175 TASERIWEcAkaua: TASER srANDoFm.s~ 7 LIVE CARTRIDGE, STANDOFF (3.5- an 30 6.50 0.00 o0.00 um - 0.00 DEGREE-.3048 DEGREE) NS 22175 22176 mamas: uv: CARTRIDGE, CLOSE YASER 77 LIVE TASER QUARTERS (IZ-DEGREE) QUARTERS moss NS (12-DEGREE) NS m 30 on 0.00 D 0.00 on w o0.00 Other 73958 OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 7 PAYMENT 12 70 1,908.00 1.908.00 133,560.00 2am 20120 use»: 77|NSI'RUC1OR TASER INSTRUCTOR counss voucuzn COURSE VOUCHER 1 1 n no 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 201W 201 19 1mm INSTRUCTOR mHODL TREE“7 MASTER INSTRUCTOR TASER VOUCHER VOUCHER SCHOOL 11 0.3“ 0.00 am 0.00 "DO 0.00 EvaMCE mm paarsssxom EVIDENCE.COM ucENsE PROFESSIONAL LICENSE 73337 73837 PAYMENT PAYMENT ‘2 12 70 10 “B W 468.00 463 468.00 DO #53030 4,680.00 20457 20437 TASER 7 :35 » W7 PAYMENT “ ' “7'” ”WM CERTIFICATION BUNDLE 12 12 ‘5 15 (tam 690.00 mm 690.00 10mm 10,350.00 Services was 777mm (51-100) REALM TRAINING VIRTUAL REALITY (51-100) 35.405 :5 20385 ”we” PAYMENT 12 12 I1 13,560 no 13,680.00 35406 35,406.35 35,406.35 5w 18:59:55 Subtotal Emmm m Estimated Tax 183,996.35 o oo 0.00 Tm: Total 153m“ 183,996.35 Year 3 D9lcllptlon Tenn Lilt Unit 111m Quantity Net Unit Pllce Total (USO) (Months) Price Hardware 22175 22175 us TASER a; mmEmAunnan‘ 7 LIVE CARTRIDGE, DEGREBNS DEGREE) STANDOFF (3.5- ND 140 0,00 0.00 ' o.oof~‘ 0.50 0,“? 0.00 Q...283689 t4212.027RB 7

Yuur 33 (Continued) Year (Conflnued) Tenn u.t Unit Net Unit Price Total(USD) 11am Dllacrlpllon (Monthe) Quantity Price ardware (Continued TASER 1 umRmGE CLOSE WE CARTRIDGE, CLOSE 2“" TASER 7 LIVE 22176 («I 140 o on 0.00 n on 0.00 man 0.00 magma mqm us CHARTERS (12-DEGREE) NS QUARTERS WWMMWP mu (HALT) TASER 7 HOOK-AND-LOOP TRN (Hun om,. , ., ado 4 mm" Mn , 22177 us CARTRIDGE, STANDOFF NS 140 0.00 0.00 a»? 0.00 HDOKMDLOOP TRN (mm TRN (HALT) gm” 1 HOOK-AND-LOOP YASER 7 TASER 22m 22178 (MRTRIDGE CARTRIDGE, CLOSE QUART QUART NS NS «40 140 n w 0.00 u 0.00 um 0.00 ., 15%)"7 LIVE CARTRIDGE, STANDOFF TASER SYANDOFHI5~(3,5- 22175 22175 DEGREE)NS :0 30 MD 0.00 “9,00 0.00 £99 0.00 22‘75 22176 am: we mammE 7 LIVE CARTRIDGE, CLOSE TASER 1 30 u 0.00 am 0.00 e on 0.00 uuerRs (anagram NS QUARTERS (12-DEGREE) N5 @111 22177 1mruogxwpwop mman TASER 7 HOOK-ANO-LOOP TRN (HALT) 3° 30 (509 0.00 1m 0.00 mg 0.00 cum»; CARTRIDGE, stmnqr’r us STANDOFF NS 22m; TASER 1 1A5ER 7 HOOK-ANDLOOP mu (HALT) HOOK-AND-LOOP TRN (rum 30 ow" 22178 0.00 0.00 0.00 CARTRIDGE cLosE QUART NS CARTRIDGE, CLOSE Other ‘ . 73309 nxgu‘ j AXON n‘EFnEsHONE CAMERA REFRESH ONE 70 . 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 73958 73958 SAFETY PLAN OFFICER SAFETY OFFICER 7 PAYMENT PLAN 7 PAYMENT ‘2 12 7n 70 £308.00 1,908.00 £608 1,908.00 133 56100 133,560.00 73m 73689 20120 MULWYEWMOCK MULTI-BAY TASER nsmssn 1sr REFRESH BWC DOCK 1ST TASER 7 INSTRUCTOR NSTRUCTDR COURSE COURSE VOUCHER VOUCHEH a9 ‘1 an 0.00 0.00 00 m 0.00 0.00 D an ‘ Md 0.00 00.00 on ism 73309 WSWREFRESH ONE AXON CAMERA REFRESH ONE 2 2 ago 0.00 no 0.00 0.00 mm 201 19 mama INSTRUCTOR use»: 77 MASTER TASER msmucmn scHnuL SCHOOL 1 non 0.00 um 0.00 0.00 VOUCHER VOUCHER EVIDENCE.COM PROFESSIONAL EV! UGENSE PROFESSIONAL LICENSE M7 magma » 73837 PAYMENT ‘2 12 19 10 4%“! 468.00 465,99 468.00 4,680.00 TASER 7 TASER CERT‘FIOATIONBUNDLE 7 CERTIFICATION BUNDLE 2W7 20437 PAYMENT PAYMENT 12 ‘5 15 am 690.00 “0 W 690.00 10,350.00 Services VIRTUAL REALITY TRAINING (511an TRAINING (51-100) 20385 PAYMENT 12 12 _‘ is 650m 13,680.00 35.406.35 35,406.35 sum-I Subtotal 183.996 as 183,996.35 Estimated Tax 0.00 rm Total mm 183,996.35 Year4 Term UatUnlt Item D11c lptl(m Quantity Net Unit Price TOIIII (USD) (Monthe) Price Hardware ”"5 22 175 mamas srmmw WE CARTRIDGE,. STANDOFF 4a YASER 77 LIVE TASER (3.5- us 140 can 0.00 u no 0.00 one 0.00 DEGREE) NS DEGREE) MS Q.28318M4212.027RS 8

Your 44 (Conti Year (Conflnuod) nued) Tenn LIit Unit llilm O.Cltpllon Quantity Net Unit Price Total (IJ80) (Months) Price Hanlwa,. (Continued) 22176 TABER? TASER WE CARTRIDGE, 7 LIVE CLOSE cARmIDaE. CLOSE un 140 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUARIERS QUARTERS I12 DEGREE) us (12-DEGREE) NS rAsER 77 LIVE CARTRIDGE. smmors LIVE CARTRIDGE, STANDOFF I: no TASER 57 (3.5- 22175 22175 30 0.00 van 0.00 0.00 DEGREE) NS DEGREE) Ms TAEEIU TASER 7 lNE CLOSE EARTRIDGE. CLOSE LIVE CARTRIDGE, 21179 22176 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUARTERS s (ll-DEGREE) (12-DEGREE) us NS Other 73955 73958 omen sum OFFICER SAFETY PLAN 1 PAVMENI 7 PAYMENT 12 70 I son an 1,908.00 was an 1.908.00 mama: 133,560.00 20120 20120 INgmucToR COURSE VOUCHER T INSTRUCTOR TASER 7 VOUCHER 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 YASER 77 MASTER TASER INSTRUCTOR scHooL MAsTEII INSTRUCTOR SCHOOL 20119 20119 VOUCHER VOUCHER I1 am 0.00 000 0.00 coo 0.00 LICENSE EvmfiIfifiDoM PROFESSIONAL LICENSE EVIDENCE.COM 13m 73837 PAYMENT PAYMENT 12 12 10 10 «a no 468.00 468.00 meow 4.680.00 10.37 20437 use»: 77 CERTIFICATION TASER cErmrIcamou BUNDLE BuNDLE 12 12 I5 15 mm 690.00 690.00 111.350 on 10,350.00 FAVMENY PAYMENT Services VIRTUAL REALIW‘TRAINING VIRTUAL REALITY ion) (51-100) TRAINING (51 20385 PAYMENT PAYMENT 12 12 1 1 13.901» 13.680.00 35.40945 35,406.35 35.4136 35,406,35 SumI Subtotal 133.995 183,996.35 Emu-m Estimated Tlx Tax we 0.00 Tam Total 133.996 as 183,996.35 Vnr 5 Year6 Tenn LIit Unit 11am DNCltptlon Quantity Net Unit Price Total (UID) (Montha) Price Hardwal9 22175 22175 we canmuee, STANDOFF ”55}? 77 LIVE CARTRIDGE, TASER stNDoFF (3.5- (3,5. 1w 140 0 on 0.00 0.00 I) DO 0.00 DEGREE) NSNS 22110 22176 wmuas. cLosE rAsER 7T LIVE CARTRIDGE, CLOSE TASER W) 140 me 0.00 am 0.00 0.00 ouAR QUARTERS (12.nEenEE)NS (12-0EGREE) NS 22175 nszn TASER 77 LIVE LIVE CARTRIDGE. srANDoFF (3.5- CARTRIDGE. STANDOFF I157 an 30 ow 0.00 0.00 D 0.00 O DEGREE) NSMS IASER 71?qu cLosE cmmlnaE. CLOSE 8 TASER LIVE CARTRIDGE, tino 22176 ouAR (1IDEGJIEE) NS QUARTERS (12-DEGREE) 30 .oS 0.00 (L00 0.00 W 0.00 Other 73955 73958 mm 71 PAYMENT omega SAFETY PLAN OFFICER PAYMENT 12 12 10 70 19mm 1,908.00 I in! M 1,908.00 ‘33 133,560.00 mm 73310 men 73688 Axon CAMERA REFREsII TWO A)(ON CAMERA MULTI-BAY MULTI-BAV BWC REFRESH awe DOCK Two 2ND REFRESH DOCK 2ND REFRESH 7a 70 9 9 m 0.00 Dan 0.00 (:ch 0.00 n w 0.00 Imp 0.00 0.0!) 0.00 zoIzo 20120 YASEKWNE’I’RUOTOR TASER? nouns: VOUCHER INSTRUCTOR COURSE VOUCHER I1 0.00 0.00 (L00 0.00 0.00 Q-283189-44212.Q27RB •

(mm-d) Vur 5 (Continued) Year Tenn LletUnlt Item DIIC lpllc.tl Quantltr Net Unit Price TOllll (USD) (Months) Pltc• Other (Continued) mm 73310 Aon CAMERA AXON «Emzsmwo CAMERA REFRESH TWO 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 20119 m TASER 7 MASTER INSTRUCTOR SCHOOL v 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 mew VOUCHER PROFESSIONAL LICENSE EVIDENCE.COM PROFESSIONAL LICENSE 73837 12 10 468.00 468.00 4,680.00 PAmEm PAYMENT TASER 7 CERTIFICATION BUNDLE 20437 12 15 690.00 690.00 10,350.00 PAYMENT Servlc:ee vmruAL REAuTv TRAINING VIRTUAL REALITY (SI-100) TRAINING (51-100) 20385 ”ma" PAYMENT I2 12 1 1 1mm: 13,680.00 35,406.35 35,406.35 35,406.35 Subtotal 183,996.35 Estimated Tax 0.00 Total 183,996.35 Grend Total 799 930.1 Q.283SIM4212.027R8 10

J\AXON Discounts (uso) Discounts (usn) Amount List Amount W: wwmq mm. Expiration: 0113112021 Quota 894.162.10 894,162.10 Discounts 94,232.00 Total 799,930.10 mum nu- wilt-Ila taxes maul excludes appl/cable "Total of Payments Summary of Summary Payments Payment Amount (USO) USP 77 Year 11 - OSP Year 53.59410 53,594.70 Veav 11 --'r7 Year Can TT Cert 10,350.00 10,350.00 Spares 0.00 0.00 Year22 Yea! 153396.35 183.996.35 Year Year33 183,996.35 183,996.35 Year4 Year4 153396.35 183,996.35 Years5 Veal 103,996,115 183,996.35 Grand Total 799,930.10 ~212.027RS f I(_ ( (.'( [ i_ ', 11

Yuumbfiflhmnwwmwmflmlm Taxi& &ubject io change at order proces&ing witn valid exemption, Axon's Sals- Tunnl and Sales Tenns Ind Condiflom Conditions mama-WW)mu- om I$r: limited mum upon m oondltionaJ mum:- ofum m mm mm and m Axon's u.” sums Mm! m- Quote This “mm to and upon your yaw acceptance mum: se.t the provisions forth herein Alan . Master .m Purchasing Services and Pun-ma Agreement “nu-mmmm (posted at www.axpn.com/legaUsales-lerms-and-conditioos), as well as the attached Sumem mam-um" Im-m MWm4sM4uA-m Statement of Work (SOW) for Axon Fleet and/or Axon lnteNlew Rm much-5e W Room l)<lrchase, maple-Mn pm... mm um mm am! Issued Inm response tom this Any purchase order applicable. Any "mum m. mum um. Quote is mm, in .. subject solely lbuv- referenced terms .m em above to the Md conditions. By mnmmw signing yuulewnlmmmyuumlrmwl below, you Io-mrlmowmu: represent that you are lawfully able to m.ummmm-nmnmmmmmmmmm enter Into contracts. If YO<J are signing or, behalf of an entity (Including but not limited to tile mum mm” m‘ am:3mm mayom. company, municipafity, or m goverMJent agency «u you war“ Mum you for whom m you law-um work), YO<J "may represent to um Am tllat YO<J m Axon you run have Iqll legal authority w um um to bind you an llyuu that entity. If m. do not hmlm have an not this autho<ity, please do mum not sign tllis Quote. sign-mu Signature: m Date: m - (Print): Name u-mm, Tmc: Title: (vanll no. (Or write PO# w NIA): mm mm anlmwm W Almflunnmm em. to Roseoe 8'0'M'l at Please sign and eman mm rbroYA1@axon.com or fax to In mm you for Thank um a. valued our being w your unlmr For Am customer. vuuefl Axon mm m order, yolJ/ convenience on your next mu am Amer, please am my check out mun: um our online store buy.axon.com m. trademarks The m mm above arem. theIna property Ind-milk) referenced m." wan-fly of mm». mm their respective owners. -Axon llltllmal lJN On comm sruc Cootract#: SFDC ovum: Order Type: awn RMA#: Ada-“Una Address Used: so: SO#: Comments: Q-28318M4212.027RB 12

J\AXON Dover Police Dept. - DE ATTENTION ATTENTION This order This order may for freight qualify for may qualify «eight shipping, the following information. out the please fill out shipping. please information, What is What is me Contact name the contact and name and numbeiiorthis phone number phone shipmeni'» for this shipment? Whatare your What your recewing hours? receiving hours? (Monday-Friday) dock available Is a dock Is iorims available for this I incuming shipment? , incoming shipment? there any Are there Are any delivery reslricimns? [no restrictions? (no box box etc) trucks, etc.) trucks, Q-283689-M212.027RB 13

ADDITIONAL PROGRAM/PERSON NEL REQUEST PROGRAM/PERSONNEL REQUEST mama." DEPARTMENT; Ponce Police Adminislrawe mam. Administrative DIVISION, wnoumursvv TYPE lam-nan OF REQUEST: RE-GRADED new [I RE•TITLE/REClASSIFY PROMOTED ximnfllscwslwl] D magnum ADD STAFF 18] Wmumou: Evidenc.t: Manager mlE/DESCRIPTION: mmMm-l/Tmnldm mam /Tec:hnldan AFS119-1 I ulwmxiuu NEW PROGRAM vex Yes mammm Eva/wanna CHANGE IN PROGRAM LEVEi/WORKLOAD m Yes swmnrmmmaun mamwmorram: SUMMARIZE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES/COST (numnwmmlzwwj OFFSETS: (DETAIL ITEMIZATION BELOW) maaaaaanamaa TOTAL EXPENDITURES aammmcas PERSONAL SERVICES summnn SUPPUES wnnus AND SERVICES camaomm CAPITAL OUTLAY Iumfivmvaru BUDGET YEAR TOTAL 59,274 69,274 0a 0D 59.27: 69,274 aasvarrsns COST OFFSETS (smmmmnnm (SUBTRACT} COST OFFSET sum-«AI SUBTOTAL mu 69,274 mm mulls TOTAL REVENUES (mmmauuarmu navmua (SUBTRACT} ANTICIPATED REVENUE nmum NET nsmamn TOTAL FISCAL EFFECT: 59,27: 69,274 mum EXPLAIN mammm m THE JUSTIFICATION FOR M: THISumm PROGRAM ox vsvswunlrnumvlrmn OR PERSONNEL REQUEST WITH AT LEAST THREE msnminnlu aranavaasum YEARS OF RElATED STATISTICS |I.L.wannmn, (I.E., WORK.LOAD, wunwll, In.) OVERTIME, In aaamon, ETC.) IN muaam mamas mum mum ma REQUEST ISa DENIED? n THE ADDmON, WHAT ARETHE CONQUENCES IF TM Police The nemmanmmaw PnHaa Department amawysaaaawman currently employs {Mute Technician. one civilian evidence AuncapuamnemaanaaYum-km Yemnldan‘ At Inception, the pusnlun handled only Evidence Te<:hnk:ian position anlyma the mam re<:eipt ind and mama storage av of ma case Ymuzuwun investigation evident; ev1dence. Soon may, after, an all pmptny property and and depanmenhehud department-related pamanaam photography rupnnxlhllmes responsibilities were aaaaa added. aaamnma Beginning In me work vemme 1539, the m 1999, position swam ma Dusmen volume for this m expanded. The aaammam steadily axaanaaa department had 81 m Wu: :1 Officers assigned ana Implunemld and implemented «a use of the ufan dammit system an electronk: mam to m havcnflz indlntk barcode and track amcles Annamme. articles. At that time, ma :v‘dln‘e Wake the evidence Intake wanna-Ind Zimarliclu was around 2100 peryear. articles per smaa year. Since man, ma department then, the aapanmam has hi: added aaaaa more maaa Wu“ Officers Ind and le will Inn have was 106 aamamauam authorizations «aaaaa funded by m: the and end .11 of m1. FY21. aaaaananuy, Concurrently, ma the mmaaaam introduction a: digital of who evidence and video dlpu‘ and awaaaaa flies Wes has chum! the maaamauuy changed has fundamentally ma scope anna Snap! of puma". maanaa the position. maa aIs now muw‘y Evidence intake roughly 45m 4800 phyxlnl physical inklescoHamd articles w vearpmsme collected per year uiaaa evidence plus the video asczhud with ev‘dame associated mm 40 in-car Aflanursyslemund mwwaw mom ma Interview systems and the rewmmxsysum room recording system. m panama wlll This position puma. oversight will provide innmnns as amaanaa functions an evidence av all {7142!}an of a; well wan as naawa staffing aa back-up during the mama staffing dunng absence ofa; ma maaaaakahnmin the Evidence Technician. "mm functions Those lumlonslnclud: (away storage the receipt, Include the sxmaaaana remevalolcas: and retrieval avxaaaawaaox of case evidence, photographs. It\u‘su ana pnoxwaam videos and mamaas annual reviews also Includes Vex/heme! of zv‘dlm! for evidence mm" disposition lav either d‘spnymun by aaamauan or Mfirev}, destruction by Officers, m disposition fllxnommn of cl aviaanaa aaaaaa, Innskvx lungs! needed, evidence no lon.ger transfers ar of aviflzmz evidence In mhev anndes to other agencies pmusslnl or «or processing for mama, answering uv analysis, :nswmnx queries cman and «am Officers aaanas from am: agencies ana other mama inm investigations "Mules Involved mvammom and [he ad)udk:atlon am: the muss. Mludkallonprocess, gamma processing a1 of illegal Mlelal dm| drug ma case mud; funds n: to ma the Niamey Attorney aamara General's amaa, office, aamwauaa completing :xpunflmenu expungements ar or pamnns, pardons, ana and mhu mated other related aauaa duties. wnn the With aaamon of ma addition at the Ier ma In-car camera aaman te<:hnology, vacmva‘y, more mm» wank mm: manual aaaaa to wax added wor1c was m ma m; position, This \ngludu the position. "an, mnavmvideos lrom Includes retrieving from ma the mar camera in-car aaaxaa, uploading cameva devices, unlaaama the the Video: videos to gamed computer la secured storage ana mmamar xmlile mam and making mowed required comes copies a« of ma the video: videos. TM; This a is mmmmea complicated m by m ma fact that the that the ma aaaamnam mummy has department currentty rm two mu different dxflzmm mobile manna waaa mmmml svxlemx video recording systems m service. a; in aamaa. max nacama As funds ivixlihk, ma become available, aldzv the older ana more and wmwaama system mar: cumbersome Svsxem Is hem phased \s being phased out. am In maamm, evidence ma meantime, In the puanIEI have awaanaa personnel to be (mum have an mam data bum Recent mm both. familiar with an: on video Manna video demansmm aa steady evidence demonstrates sin-’1 .maaaa increase in .a ma the volume volume at of aamana demand. mm". 2m. During 2018, ass 366 mam major aan data warmers transfers lack took plan a; place as wan well In as 270 Office! & Officer m a 177 Attorney mines“ Genera! requests Allomev General fay for v‘den video mas files wava were mama. re<:elved. Dunn: Duringms, 2019, mum major am data mascara transfers were Iawar lower a: at 211, 281, am but 191 298 omaay Officer ma Attorney and 190 vlquzns and requests annual requests mamay General mquafi were waaa vuewzd cavm has received. COVID mmzwhatskewed has somewhat akawaa the 202a aau ma 2020 data. It:2 Wu handingmay." was trending during ma higher duvmg the quanar but Flrsl Quarter First but moderated durinnh: maaayaxaa during nnlnmamrmrsimer‘ency the ongoing Governor's order: In Emergency Orders raspuuaaaa m response ma aanaamla to the nasana flu! pandemic. Despite dynamic, mara that dynamc, there hm been have bun 268 165 major am zuns'm, "mm data 1a: Officer transfers, 263 offiaa: requests vaquans and ma lSS Almmzy namal 155 Attorney vtquzflsIhmu'h General requests through 20In November 202a,2020. ma \mmemenuunn The implementation of Manamnawaw Managing mm m mama requires video evidence an camaya (BWC) Bafly Worn camera the new Body mnadwnnnd lemme: more Dmlmm wm lawC) program nma than actions and time ma regular aaa 70 will add mu‘avuldenze 7n Lamevas cameras to the Aaamam-aanaaaau evidence. Regular n ma aamma will) maaawana existing video management maaa anaaaa In evidence gets checked mana aama and out burden. via aaaaaaa barcode. mama has waaa evidence Video his to be be uploaded Iran the cameras unloaded from ameras m ma secure to the mama, logged mama location, comuuw storage aaama computer waned In that it «ma; verified 1mm m and venfled to m: relates m the vehide. ma mkmnmd vanmla referenced Ween have The Officers hiv: to u; an: mdmm for w tag each video{s) car every aaaa, £152;in case; and when when may they mikz make in an umv, error, awaaaca evidence pngnngl personnel In: have In to hllnw- follow~ up mlh them to nu with an resolve «swam uh: discrepancy and index 1550M: the Index 1: m manaaav mam use manager man-I case In the digital it in AlIu pmpev system. After preservation, avmaa proper preservmun. puwnne‘ will evidence personnel wlll ananas by am othlr entitles man other work with 4»; access «7 providing am: ma digital aaaanaa to the evidence fur am proceedings aua for court pmfled‘ngx maaamwa purposes. mhev Investigative and other Dummies m to an In addition «a \mmemeamuumndiddmnnalvidlo immense amount hall-e. the of additional vldeo footase, Iwc prosram a». BWC wfllikomtmduce pray-m will also M of new introduce a lot nfncwiudn-mmnd mammmnms. Some audit•related requirements. Sammy!are mama In various laws or rooted \nuv‘uusllwxuvmlululonsznfl regulations and umers muuedhninnsundlvdx aanam t·o accreditation others pertain standards. w‘m respeuw With respect unsound will laws, evidence personnel amaay laws. to privacy mu m mama m mama. (am also be tasked with redacting features of people and any Adnmilhhlekalwesewum My Identifiable (blurring out) imc‘u In videos other articles 9mm vlfleos prior mlnselnm: man release to their to the yublk public. mummy, all Ultimately, mm a.» be am.“ actions will an police b! dummmtld, documented, from«mm writing mm" hckau to wvmnl parking tickets tampon-1m: responding m criminal aligning to anmmau offenses .a in mule); ind Inlulcflanx progress and interactions with alum: mm End: scene citizens. Each auumamaa may a documented (km is mane that m. videos naaa ten may have videos or 91mm: 9... would more that mama be uphidgd .aa aa upk>aded maaaaaa and w: and managed puma" would this position would a». have ma veanslbmzy for primary responsibility the primary mm. for syncing all a... together m; data :H this (cluhar and mik‘ng n and making inflame fur It available ipnmpnlw dlssem‘naunn for appropriate Newmvme dissemination. However mum the amount walk mamama work that mama IsImam aa required would be lhuipiflly aavana the well beyond Mouton-person capacity of our maaaaa Section. one-person Evidence samaa, An mama Section m. Evidence mam be Secllon Manager would aa vaaanaa mm mm [M Impact of m absorb the required to law: mum“ m aa BWC program as :s well wan as lnsrall ma necessary Install the Izmunubllwfor uneasily accountability [or m; this mum a responsibility. ms am of .aaaaaalamzy critical area This mm aa the primary control would be position would am conml point for(or all we systems .3“ the Manna generated mums and evidence unamaa by w ma my the body wan. mum worn cameras. It u would maintain malnum theme syflams aaaa to systems used dcwmnad the m download ma data ham the data from Lh: cameras camzmx var ma purp0se for the awaaaa of name or stora. museum: retrieval of ge and subsequent at files mm. mm, as files for review. Lastty, a; maanaa, muammama mentioned, It will picksslnnllsundavd ensure the professional standard Is ml‘milned on a maintained nnaH 1am of all forms Maiden: maaaaaa by evidence managed Mme DnverPnhu the Dover Depanmun. Police Department.

mu DESCRIBE (1) THEBENEFITS o1 m (1) This position (1) (um-1mm pushlon will pun-m,ANO OF FUNDING, delw increased wm deliver mo (2) w: COSTS OF NOT FUNDING THISPROGRAM O m THE Manna transparency mar ummmms Innxpirency of m 771qu m police m renown REQUEST: cum lawsuits mlmmm costly wmk and help minimize palm! work onRPERSONNEL Ilwxuns or 71mm: cum against the department, m claims mm m 1191mm, hm both 57.4mm of mam. mm my. Increasing In hive been which have In recent years. 111m, having In addition, years 1.. m mm. the addmum‘ addltlonal person person in Name smug“ .1» Evidence m the mu help mlnwmu Section will minimize wan wait mm for times mm: mm equipmentproblems ’57 getti ng body camera equipment mm mm files and, getting video pmhlemx fixed, mum: «mm-1 as well mu delivered files prepared and new mums mm. mu as keeping operations running mm ma‘y 147mm, more timely and and efficiently. 12) If (2) mom. the m! funded, w not mu not cum!!! staff will the current m nm be Me to b: able lap up mm on keep up may we already increasing with the Immaslm workload. 34117171317»: 11mm of The addition BWC mhnohn 91 swc ml! technology will at: our take our woman! workload an to in «may an entiretynu new ma. level. wnmm Without (he the mama-mum:of introduction a Mama, Manager, mums Officers m1 and lmphmx employees wul will camimm conUnue an to anagram experience any: of increasing delays mum incmaslnl magnitude In my. mu: suppon of m support mum uf evidence upmum. momma: IsIs ummma Flaw, not operations. Finally, mmsmnlv well-m 7mm. 1a consistently nm having well-managed swc program ad BWC wru Drum!" Will mm m MMwMIen! create an environment where public confidence DuuM um undermined. Doubt gems! In will persist uurcommmemln m our commitment to mmpmncy muunummy ind/M accountability transparency and/or mum wwm 141m 111m (he Improved defense and thus the clams/law 31m: mummy claims/law against liability suits M“ Ion. be lost. will be HRSONAI. Sl!IIVICIS wan ACCT# usual-mu DESCRIPTION mussm REQUEST FY am FY+l we FY+Z m3 FY+3 rvu FY+4 ms FY+S 11m 10•11 5mm Salaries 16,7111 46,700 41,1011 48,100 :9 son 49,500 51 we 51000 51,590 52,500 um 54.100 um 10-12 menial! Overtime 0n 0n 0n 0n 0n a0 1111 10-14 names FICA Taxes 3,573 3,650 3,680 3,717 3,787 3 3,902 5,1115 4,016 1,133 4,139 11:15 10-15 mun Immune Health Insurance 11,171 13,171 13.555 13,565 13.371 13,971 14,311 14,389 11,313 14,819 15,162 15,262 me 10-16 no Immune LID Insurance as: 262 man 266.20 2m 270 17s 276 230 280 m 284 175 1117 10-17 workmln'scumpenumn Workman's Comoensatlon 151 151 155 156 150 160 155 165 m1 170 175 nus 10-19 Per-mu Pension 21:02 2,802 1.315 2,886 mm 2,970 3,060 3,1159 3,1511 3,150 3,246 3,1115 um 10-20 um OPEB 2,515 2,615 1.591 2,694 2,771 2,772 2,856 2,1155 1,940 2,940 3,030 mu TOTAL 59,271 69,274 71347 71,347 73m 73,430 75,541 75,648 77 7s 77,875 59,1313 80,236 SUPPUES AND SERVICES pom ACCT# nun-man DESCRIPTION nmussvn REQUEST FY FY+l m1 n11 FY+Z m3 FY +3 ma FY+4 ms FY+S «77» TOTAL 0n 0n 0n a 0 0n a0 CAPITAL OUTLAY mm TOTAL 011 0n 0a a 0 0n 0n my mmHumane GRAND TOTAL 59 17. 69,274 71,347 73,431 73,430 75 543 7S,648 77,175 77,875 19.235 80,236 comm mum can, CONTACT PERSON: Capt. Hermance PHONE #: 736-7110

Dover Police Dept. - DE AXON SALES REPRESENTATIVE Roscoe Brown 6106204681 rbrown@axon.com ISSUED 8/7/2020 Q-263610-44050.617RB 1

o-mumuaflka Q-263610-44050.617RB Am Era-lurks. Inc. Axon Enterprise, Inc. mow 17800 N 35m 51 85th St Sums-u, Amnml mmum Scottsdale, umau States United 552.55 Arizona 85255 pm um Payment Terms: um mm Fug-1.6mm D-Iv-ry Mettlod: Fedex - Dellve,y Net an 30 Ground mm. (800) Phone: «my 978-2737 um mnznznnnv: SALES REPRESENTATIVE Roscoe Brown RO$COO ammo SHIP TO Mwm Mailey Marvin «may mm BlLL TO now Puma Dover Dept. -, DE Police Dept DE Ema nmazfilmi Pnone: 6106204881 Mmom Fax: cam Email: itrown@a.xon.com PchI Dept Dam Police Dover Dem •» DE 4m s 400 S QUEEN ST ‘“ 400 S 400 5 QUEEN sr QUEEN ST as 19904 DOVER, DE DOVER, mam WWW “mm, PRIMARY CONTACT ncvsn‘ DE DOVER. us 19904 want us ".mnwm Marvin Malley us mm (34m mm Phone: (302) H 736-7111 Em. maMn mmwyfiq m. m. Email: marvin.mailey@cj,state.de.us Yul Year11 Term List Unit Item Deec:rlptlon Quantity Net Unit Price Total (USD) (Monthl) Price Axon Plans & Packages 73683 an Evmeucs m GB 10 com A-LA-CART EVIDENCE.COM ALAVCARI'STORAGE 60 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 73m 73746 7333: 73683 950mm 10 as EVIDENCE m GB EVIDENCECOM LICENSE PROFESSIONAL EVIDENCE.COM coM A-LA-CARY EVIDENCE.COM uceus: A-LA-CART STORAGE w 60 so 60 6a 70 100 0.00 a 0.00 0.00 n on 0.00 0.00 0.00 o m: 0.00 73840 alumina“ Access LICENSE BAS‘IE ACCESS EVlDENCE.COM BASIC LICENSE an 60 70 my am 0.00 am 0.00 0.00 7st: 73683 as EVIDENCE w GB 10 EmochEcoM LLAfiART STORAGE COM A-LA-CART m 60 Lsnn 1,500 a an 0.00 u an 0.00 n0.00 on ! Hardware I 73202 AonHQW AXON mm BODY 3a .- NA10 70 699.00 0.00 0.00 742m 74210 now a3 -8 Axon BODY AXON re BAY sAV DOCK BOOK 9 L495 on 1,495.00 1:95 on 1,495.00 «3,455 on 13,455.00 mm 74028 cu? MOUNT, AXON RAPIDLOCK WING CLIP WING RAHDLocK 77 77 0.00 0.00 gm 0.00 0.00 0.00 mm 11534 ussc “SBA CABLE u: USB-A USB-C to row AB3 cAaLE FOR on FLEX As: OR FLEX 2 70 one 0.00 o no 0.00 00.00 an ems 87063 PLAN BODY TECH ASSURANCE PLAN BODY 3 CAMERA CAMERA: 12 70 333.00 336.00 cm 0.00 0m 0.00 ”WE," PAYMENT 2mm 87062 TECH ASSURANCE PLAN TECH PLAN EVBAV sum 3 8-BAY BODY ‘2 12 9 55‘ °° 354.00 35‘ °° 354.00 3J8600 3,186.00 DOCK PAYMENY DOCK PAYMENT 70033 amxn, Moum BRACKET, Assv‘ WALL MOUNT WALL ASSY, 9 9 mac 43.90 “3° 43.90 assAn 395.10 EonNcacou DOCK EVIDENCE.COM been Other 7mm 71019 rowan CORD NORTH AMER POWER NORTH cum) FOR row AB3 a. A33 8- 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 new saAV DOCK AB2 1-BAY /I 6-BAY BAY. AER BAV‘ DUCK Q.263610 UOII0.617RS 2

Van (continued) Year 1 (Continued) Tenn u.tllnlt Quantity Nat Unit Price Total (USO) """' DNcrlpClon r (Continued) (MonlM) Price EVIDENCE.COM PROFESSIONAL LICENSE 73837 12 6 ‘ 468.00 468.00 2,808.00 pA PAYMENT _ ‘ _ 73w Evmsucz 73841 BASIC uczwse com BASIC EVIDENCE.COM mama LICENSE PAYMENT \2 12 70 «an no 180.00 man 180.00 11mm 12,600.00 13321 73827 As; AB3 mm m: mam CAMERA TAP WARRANTY an 60 In 70 Me 0.00 om 0.00 um 0.00 um 73828 an up wwww AB: 85 BAY DOCK AB3 DOCKTAP WARRANTY an 60 9s a an 0.00 a an 0.00 a m) 0.00 mu 73831 10 ‘D GB 57' EVIDENCE.COM STORAGE PAYMENT FEMS“”mm" A-LA-CART 12 12 tam 1,500 4w 4.80 0.00 am 0.00 Servtcn 35144 85144 STARTER AXON STARTER 1 1 175mm 2,750.00 won 667.09 w 09 667.09 sum Subtotal ”111.19 33,111 .19 2mm: Estimated "0.00 W W In 5mm; Shipping Estimated Tax um 0.00 nml Total mm ‘9 33,111 .19 Spares Tenn UetUnlt Imm DHcrlptlon Quantity Net Unit Price Total(USD) (Monthll) Price Hardware 73202 0' BODY 3 -_'NA10a AXON _ : 2 699.00 0.00 0.00 YECH TECH ASSURANCE PLAN BODV 3 CAMERA PLAN BODY CAMERA mes 87063 “m PAYMENTm an 60 2 1,680.00 u 09 0.00 0.00 um 74028 WING CLIP , meocK gnaw, Axon RAPIDLOCK 'P MOUNT, AXON 2 2 0.00 moo 0.00 0.00 nsu 11534 ussc Us“ cm: m pox AB3 OR m USB-A CABLE FOR USB-C to 0R FLEX FLEX 2z 2 0.00 mm 0.00 0.00 mm 73202 Mm mm a •- NA AXON BODY 3 NA“: 10 55 may 699.00 Mo 0.00 0.00 TECH ASSURANCE PLAN BODYJCAMERA PLAN BODY 3 CAMERA 37063 87063 Eszéfiumuce PAYMENT SO 60 5 1.66000 1,680.00 000 0.00 0.00 um WING muggy 74028 CLIP MOUNT, MON mmmcx MOUNY, AXON RAPIDLOCK 55 am 0.00 one 0.00 0.00 nsu 11534 usac to USB-C Us” cm: son AB3 m USB-A CABLE FOR As: OR nsxz on FLEX 2 5 u an 0.00 am 0.00 u an 0.00 Other 73827 AB3 CAMERA TAP WARRANTY no 60 2 0,00 000 0.00 0.00 73827 ABS CAMERA AB3 upwmmmv CAMERA TAP WARRANTY an 60 5 0.00 o 0.00 even 0.00 WI Subtotal m Esumnled Estimated Tax 0.00 0.00 n m 0.00 WU Total um 0.00 Q-283610 UOIO!i117RB 3

VII! 2 Year2 Tenn UetUnlt n.m DMcrlpllon (llonllls) Quantity Price Net Unit Price Total (USO) Hardware max mun/tun: mu saw atCAMERA TECH ASSURANCE PLAN BODY 3 1: m - a ,, aim: M66 A «23.520110 mum 87063 12 70 336.00 336.00 23,520.00 PAYMENT 37062 87062 run “an new 3a rscx ASSURANCE PLAN 8-BAY BODY TECH u 12 9s :54 m 354.00 35 2,093.38 13.340 :4 18,840.24 ”WEN max PAYMENT DOCK Other on PROFESSIONAL PROFESSION LICENSE 13m 73837 EVIDENCE.COM :11 ‘‘ PAYMENT LICENSE 12 12 6a 468.00 “w, 468.00 amen 2,808.00 73w 73841 EVIDENCE sou BASIC EVIDENCE.COM BASIC ucswss mmzm LICENSE PAYMENT 12 12 70 mm 180.00 mo 180.00 12.500 12,600.00 raw . 73831 w GB 10 egi‘ewggwacan EVIDENCE.COM A-LA-CART gunmen/Mam STORAGE PAYMENT mum 12 12 1.500 1,500 ,uo, 4.80 w: ; 4.80 V 7mm - 7,200.00 v summm Subtotal sues 64,968.24 5mm m Estimated Tax n no 0.00 ram Total sues,» 64,968.24 Your Year33 Tenn I.lat Unit Item Deecripllon Quantity Net Unit Prlee Total(USD) (Months) Price Hardware was: mm ASSURANCE PLAN TECH ASSURANCE scmsm aonv 3 CAMERA PLAN BODY u m 87063 “man PAYMENT 12 70 335 no 336.00 00 336.00 23.51;: no 23,520.00 rain AQEURANOE PLAN TECH ASSURANCE sows ”AV BODY 3 PLAN 8-BAY am: 87062 110::me DOCK PAYMENT , 12 12 9a sum 354.00 as 2,093.36 mum 18,840.24 I Other I 733:7 73837 swnsnce paorzssmm LICENSE cou PROFESSIONAL EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE a 12 6u «a no 468.00 we no 468.00 2,305 on 2,808.00 mmsm PAYMENT 1w" 73841 WGWBASICLICENSE EVIDENCE.COM BASIC LICENSE PAYMENT PAYMENT 12 m 70 up 180.00 man 180.00 12mm 12,600.00 mas 73309 new CAMERA AXON BODY narnesn one CAMERAREFRESH ONE 70 am 0.00 a0.00 on a on 0.00 mac 73689 Muuuw awe DOCK MULTl-BAY BWC nocx MIDmass" mu REFRESH 9I am 0.00 00.00 am 0.00 mos 73309 AXON aouv cmsm REFRESH on: BODY CAMERA names” ONE 21 o no 0.00 am 0.00 a0.00 no mos 73309 AXDNSWVCAMERA AXON BODY on: REFRESH ONE CAMERA REFRESH 5 5 am 0.00 a0.00 on so a0.00 Q-263810-4CCl50.617RB 4

v." (Continued) Year 3 (Continued) Item Deacnpllon Tenn Quan1lty ~ Net UnltPllce Total(USD) (lllonths) Other (Contin.,.d) 73531 73831 an EVIDENCE.COM «a GB 10 MACARY EmnEMcELOM A-LA-CART 12 12 L500 1,500 ‘50 4.80 AW 4.80 7100 7,200.00 STORAGE PAYMENT STORAGE FAYMENY mm! Subtotal «mm 64,968.24 Enmaued Tlx Estimated Tax 0 00 0.00 mi Total 64,ng 64,968.24 Velr Year4 Tenn UlltUnlt Net Unit Price Total (USO) Item Deec:nptlon Quantity (Months) Price Hardware 87063 TECH ASSURANCE TECH soon MM PLAN BODY 3 CAMERA ASSURANCE PLAN 12 70 336.00 336.00 2.1.520on 23,520.00 PAYMENT PAYMENT me: 87062 PLAN 8- TECH ASSURANCE PLAN new ”mam EDDY 3 BAY BODY 8-BAY 12 9 awe 354.00 new 2,093.36 mum 18,840.24 , DOCK PAYMENT Other EVIDENCE.00M PROFEssIONAL EVIDENCE.COM PROFESSIONAL UCENSE LICENSE 12 H 6 468.00 468.00 2,808.00 73837 PAmEMV PAYMENT mm 73841 EVIDENCE BASIC ucmse com BASIC EVIDENCE.COM FAVMENY LICENSE PAYMENT 12 12 70 mu m 180.00 mm: 180.00 1250090 12,600.00 1:19;) 10 "‘ bzogvAwwm GB EVIDENCE.COM A-LA-CART won an AM 12mm , 73551 73831 31.0 wimw STORAGE PAYMENT 12 12 1,500 4.80 4.80 7,200.00 sum-4 Subtotal Mass 64,968.24 Elmraw Estimated Tax 0.00 0.00 Total uses 64,968.24 Your Years5 Tenn Lletllnlt Item Desctlptlon Quantity Net Unit Price Total (USD) (Monthe) Price Hardware TECH ASSURANCE PLAN BODY SCAMERA BODV 3 CAMERA 57063 87063 PAYMENT PAYMENT 12 10 70 336.00 335 m 336.00 2! 520m 23,520.00 87062 WCEFMNHA‘IW‘IS TECH ASSURANCE PLAN DOCK PAYMENT 8-BAY BODY 3 12 9 354.00 gown 2,093.36 mm 18,640.24 Other EVIDENCECOM PROFESSIONAL UCENSE EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE «as m 2 am: no 73637 mm“ 73837 12 6 468.00 468.00 2,608.00 PAYMENT 71w 73841 Evméyighopu BASIC ucENsE PAYMENT EVIDENCE.COM BAStC LICENSE PAYMENT 12 12 10 70 1mm 180.00 1mm 180.00 12mm 12,600.00 mm 73310 sow Axon BODY CAMERA AXON Mo REFRESH lWO CAMERA REFRESH 10 70 can 0.00 u on 0.00 one 0.00 man 73688 mum» awe DOCK MULTI-BAY BWC FINAL RBRESH DOCK FINAL REFRESH H 9 mm 0.00 am 0.00 (we 0.00 mm 73310 sow CAMERA REFRESH AXON BODY CAMERA Mo REFRESH lWO 2 we 0.00 a oo 0.00 o no 0.00 Q-26361~.617RB 5

Yur 5 {Continued) Year (Conflnuod) Tenn UstUnlt Net Unit Price Tofal(USD) _ Ham Deecrlptlon Quantity (Months) Price Other (ConUnued) 7am 73310 3on CAMERA REFRES AXON BODY CAMERA AXON REFRESH TWO , 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 GB EVIDENCE 10 COM A-LA—CARY EVIDENCE.COM A-LA-CART 73531 73831 STORAGE PAYMENT STORAGE PAVMENY 12 12 L500 1,500 ‘4.80 W 4 an 4.80 7,200.00 smut Subtotal mew 64,968.24 Emu-mind Tux Estimated Tax 00.00 w 91w Total 64,968.24 Grand Total 292,ff4.11 Q.263810-44050.617RB 8

J\AXON Discounts (usoi Discounts (usn) am- Wm: mum Quota Expiration: 08/31/2020 List Amount 328‘753. 328,753.10 1 Discounts 35,768.95 Total 292,984.15 m- mm.- wile-bk taxes 'Taul excludes appl/cab/e "Total Summary of Payments Summary of Payments Payment Amount (USD) Year1 Year1 33,111.19 Spares Spares 0.00 0.00 Year Year2 64863124 64,968.24 Yea! 33 Year $4,965.24 64,968.24 Yea! Year4 $4,968.24 64,968.24 Veer 55 Year M96824 64,968.24 Grand Total 292,984.15 Q-263610-<M050.617RB 7

W» m mm u :subject 10 Tax l:s man-nu. um M m. .m 1mm .. order processing with valid exemption. change 81 Silas Tenns Axon’I Sales Axon's Ind Conditions Torml and Condfluns nu Dual. is This Quote mm .u n lfmited to madman-l upon (a and conditional am. pm...» m m. mum ma want-ma of the pro\lisions set forth herein Mr acceptance upon your mm SoMou and Axon'sI Ma$tet Services and Man Pumuw Ag,eement m Purchasing Mae/mm mm n (posted at WMY axon - m .. mm.Strand «mm m “flu In: attached com/legal{ffles-terms-and;<;onditlgi)sl , ss well ss the mar—1 Statement of alwm Am Interview (sow; fo, Axon Fleet and/0< Axon WO<k (SOW) mum-w Ram Room nuvchue numme mm mm“, um mm issued inm resp0<1se to lllis amuse order My purc:11ase purchase, ff applicable, My unnamay m. Quote Is subject manhunt-layman: In the above solely 10 referenced terms and um annulu- conditions. By «my signing new. below, you mmmm n mm“ mm: mwm mam-n mm contracts, Ifwan-m mmwmmn, yuu represent 111st you are lawfully able to enter into IMHNnfluflW you are signing on behalf of an entity “mmmm (lndudlng but not limited to the mum mm m- mama-m or co,npany, municipality, have .mly Wm mm m m» .2me m government luancy p‘usemwmtm this authority. please do our whom you work). you agency for om ms Quote. not sign this w: mum um yw represent to am you ha"" Arm lllal m Axon MVI legal authority «a um um to t,;nd that mm entity. If you do not mm mum. Signature: um Date: um. I-nmr Nome (Print): mu: TIiie: ,0. mu. [or wrtte PO# (Or mu: NIA}: mm mm. m "mama W Him Nun-m Please sign mm mm or and email to Roscoe Brown al rbr0VK1@axon.com m fax to mm Thank you . mm mm a vah.Jed Axon my being you for mmr mm mmemm on Axwl oostomer. Fa, your convenience your mu an yum um. um: mmw next order. please check out our mime Mm buy.@)!On.com ootine store m mammmm m Ibwe are tne The trademar1<s referenced above Wm arm's-wav- mm m- propeny of their respedlve 01M1ers. SFOC Contracl#: Order Type: RMA#: Address Used: SO#: Comments: Q.263610 440ICl.617RB 8

COMMITTEE ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole – Legislative, Finance and Administrative Committee DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Manager’s Office DATE SUBMITTED: January 21, 2021 PREPARED BY: Matt Harline, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Review of Expenditures - Dover Police Academy REFERENCE: None RELATED PROJECT: N/A REVIEWED BY: Matt Harline, Interim City Manager EXHIBITS: A – Expenditure Spreadsheet (created by Robin Adkins, modified by Matt Harline) EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: ~$16,633.82 AMOUNT BUDGETED: None FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): unknown – possible $15,000 offset with tuition revenues from other cities. TIME TIMETABLE: Spring Academy will start in early April RECOMMENDED ACTION: If the Committee determines that the program should be continued: 1. Approve the Spring Academy expenses if the State Academy is not a viable option for Spring 2021. 2. Recommend that the Council direct Police Command Staff to prepare a full budget for a FY 2021-22 Academy for the budget review process with assistance from the several departments affected. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION: In the summer of 2020 the Dover Police Department (DPD) was recruiting for eight open positions that were in the FY2021 budget. With the pandemic affecting the ability of the Delaware State Police Academy to accept all of the officers that the City had ready, Chief Thomas Johnson approached his immediate supervisor, Mayor Christiansen about the possibility about reviving the Dover Police Academy. With approval to go ahead, the DPD staff quickly assembled an academy and reached out to nearby police departments and enrolled several recruits and launched the Academy on October 4, 2020. Years ago, the DPD held their own academy and had obtained certification for operating a police academy in Delaware. That certification had not lapsed and so the Dover Police Academy is a fully certified academy in the State of Delaware. Moreover, DPD has routinely lent staff to the State Police Academy, most recently PFC Willie Johnson. As one of the largest departments in the State and having full CALEA (Commission for the Accreditation of Law Enforcement Agencies) accreditation, DPD were able to have staff available for various modules of the Academy without sacrificing quality. ANALYIS: However, there are costs to the operation, and it is clear that a more deliberate analysis of the cost and benefits is overdue. The City Manager’s Office has repeated the advice that all affected departments be brought in to help develop a better analysis (CMO – budgeting, Customer Service – billing, Fleet services – vehicles, Finance – overall accounting). Attached is a spreadsheet put together by DPD to review the expenses and revenue sources with some minor edits by the City Manager. The cost of the Fall Academy includes both capital costs and operational costs and they are not well separated, but the net cost for just the Fall Academy is approximately $9,600. This does not count the funds original amount budgeted for training eleven new officers ($15,950 – with assumptions for attrition plus openings) or the additional unbudgeted but necessary expenditure for the three additional recruits ($4,350) which the City would have spent without the Academy.

Determining the costs to a finer detail would require pulling out the capital expenditures for things like workout equipment, mats & wall pads, the facility work and properly amortizing them. It would require getting a full cost of the personnel costs that would be required for each “semester”. During the Fall of 2020, DPD had several officers whose regular duties were curtailed by COVID (e.g. the School Resource Officer), assisted with construction and training and so their labor costs do not appear to be fully scored in this analysis. This will not be the case in the future and the full cost for those officers will need to be assessed. In addition, three vehicles that had been declared surplus and were headed for GovDeals were required for the driving part of the Academy. One of those cars was pretty badly damaged and its value diminished. Finally, the billing for other local law enforcement agencies was developed on the fly, but a better assessment, the costs that should be charged and how applications and billing will be handled needs to be worked out both for Spring and for the FY 2022 budget if the Academy is to move forward. As for revenue streams, it should be noted that even with a short notice period, several agencies sent officers and paid tuition. The spreadsheet shows $11,275 in tuition paid, and there has been a great deal of interest from other agencies for this Spring Academy. The fee/tuition established by DPD in Fall 2020 was $1,000 and the spreadsheet shows $15,000 plus there will be five new DPD recruits. For the capital costs $24,908.63 was redirected from Federal Forfeiture funds and from a Violent Crimes grant to standing up the Academy – with full vetting to assure compliance. We also had $3,233 donated. The remaining funds required were either budgeted funds for supplies and equipment that were in the FY21 budget. The City also pursued CARES funds to offset some costs associated with running the Academy, since COVID prompted the need, but we were denied. Based on the information present, the City should expect unique costs for the Academy to run about $16,600 for supplies for the Spring Academy, but this includes no salary expenses for instruction, no indirect costs for billing, fleet services, etc. If we continue to charge $1,000 for outside agencies and we get the estimated fifteen recruits from other agencies for the Academy, most of those known costs will be offset. It is clear that the $1,450 charged by the State, including room and board, is highly subsidized. Without outside assistance, it is not clear if the City can continue to run the Academy without additional expense. PROPOSED ACTION • If the State Academy is able to absorb all of the City of Dover recruits for their Spring Academy, this option should also be evaluated. • If the Spring Academy is the best option, the Committee should recommend that DPD continue with the Spring Academy. • If the Committee is interested in pursuing a continuation of the Dover Police Academy, the Committee should recommend that the Council direct staff to review all costs from the Fall course and the preliminary numbers for Spring 2021 and the Academy and include it in a proposal that includes the full costs and the possible sources of revenues that can be evaluated during the FY 2022 budget process.

FY21 DOVER POLICE ACADEMY PROGRAM EXPENSES as of 12/7/20 Budget / Approved Items Estimate Spent Encumb Balance Source / Account Remarks Account Police Academy Office Supplies 704.54 704.54 - - Budget / 52026 moved from 52022 100-11-17-00-000-52026 Police Academy Cleaning Supplies 193.74 77.40 Budget / 52026 100-11-17-00-000-52026 Workout Equipment 9,597.53 9,597.53 - - Budget / 52026 100-11-17-00-000-52026 Defensive Tactics Equipment 1,154.59 1,154.59 - - Budget / 52026 100-11-17-00-000-52026 Mats & Wall Pads 3,447.00 2,927.00 - 520.00 Budget / 52026 100-11-17-00-000-52026 Academy Simuntions 6,689.73 544.29 - 6,145.44 Budget / 52026 Pending Receipt 100-11-17-00-000-52026 Other program supplies 1,031.54 1,031.54 - - Budget / 52026 100-11-17-00-000-52026 Academy Taser Supplies 6,262.00 - - 6,262.00 Budget / 52026 Pending Receipt 100-11-17-00-000-52026 knife fighting kit 955.50 955.50 - - Budget / 52026 100-11-17-00-000-52026 Police Academy PT Gear 2,712.00 2,712.00 - - Budget / 52026 moved from 52029 100-11-17-00-000-52026 Misc Food & Water 597.68 597.68 - - Budget / 52026 moved from 53028 100-11-17-00-000-52026 Dover recruits & instructors uniforms 6,055.65 6,055.65 - - Budget / 52029 100-11-17-00-000-52029 Overtime 5,041.98 5,041.98 - - Budget / 30-51012 Instructor preparation and 100-11-17-30-000-51012 consturction help Facility work (walls & flooring) 10,425.63 10,425.63 - - Fed Forfeiture / 52026 207-11-17-34-000-52026 PDGFEDFORF-Line 1 Facility work (lighting) 6,250.00 6,250.00 - - Fed Forfeiture / 52026 Devary Electric - FF funds 207-11-17-34-000-52026 approved 9/9/20 & 10/5/20 PDGFEDFORF-Line 1 Microsoft Surface Pros (3 ea) 5,000.00 - - 5,000.00 Grant / V-21-20 Pending Receipt 209-11-17-32-000-52026 PDGVCF-2020-line 9 Total 66,119.11 48,075.33 - 17,927.44 *budget expenses coded to PDACMY 33,345.85 20,302.07 - 13,043.78 Budget / 52026 program equipment & supplies 100-11-17-00-000-52026 6,055.65 6,055.65 - - Budget / 52029 uniforms 100-11-17-00-000-52029 5,041.98 5,041.98 Budget / 30-51012 Overtime 100-11-17-30-000-51012 Expense Totals by Account 5,000.00 - - 5,000.00 Grant / V-21-20 Microsoft Surface Pros (3 ea) 209-11-17-32-000-52026 PDGVCF-2020-line 9 19,908.63 16,675.63 - 3,233.00 Fed Forfeiture / 52026 facility work 207-11-17-34-000-52026 PDGFEDFORF-Line 1 Total Expenses 69,352.11 48,075.33 - 21,276.78 *budget expenses coded to PDACMY REVENUES Amount Vendor / Description Account Donations Received (materials value reflected, no funding received) 458.00 U and I Builders, Inc. 200 ea 2X4 wood studs used in construction n/a 750.00 PPG, Inc interior paint for new area n/a 750.00 Crossfit Killshot 1 ea 4 person worm n/a 1,275.00 DE Emergency Mdical Services 1ea AED unit n/a Grant Fund Revenues 19,908.63 Federal Forfeiture (facility work) 207-11-00-00-000-33141 5,000.00 Violent Crimes Fund Grant (instructor tablets) 209-11-00-00-000-33165 Revenues from Agencies (Billed Tuition & PT Gear) 11,275.00 Fall 2020 Academy Session - Revenues Received 100-11-00-00-000-35126 PA 15,000.00 Spring 2021 Academy Session - Estimated Revenues 100-11-00-00-000-35126 PA Total Revenues 39,416.63 SAVINGS Amount Description Account 15,950.00 FY21 Tuition budgeted for DSP Academy (11 recruits at $1450 each) 100-11-17-00-000-53028 4,350.00 Tuition for higher than normal attrition (3 recruits over amount budgeted) 100-11-17-00-000-53028 Total Savings 20,300.00 NET TOTAL (9,635.48) SURPLUS OR (SHORTFALL) (Revenues + Savings - Expenses)

COMMITTEE INFORMATIONAL ITEM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Works DATE SUBMITTED: January 15, 2020 PREPARED BY: Sharon J. Duca, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Update on Stormwater Design Projects REFERENCE: Mirror Lake Drainage Basin Improvements and East Lake Garden Drainage Basin Improvements Projects RELATED PROJECT: N/A REVIEWED BY: Matt Harline, Interim City Manager EXHIBITS: N/A EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $34,000 and $44,500, respectively FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Funding is available through a carry forward of the FY20 capital budget for the projects. Mirror Lake Drainage Basin Improvements has a budget of $75,000 (101- 12-18-60-000-54030) and East Lake Garden Drainage Basins Improvements has a budget of $80,000 (101-12- 18-60-000-54030). BUDGETED IMPACT: Both projects are within budget. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The Mirror Lake Drainage Basin Improvements and East Lake Garden Basin Improvements Projects were identified by staff to upgrade existing stormwater infrastructure upstream of Mirror Lake and within the East Lake Garden Development, respectively. Both projects are for the design of the necessary improvements. These projects were advertised to the public as a Request for Proposals in accordance with the City’s purchasing policy by the City’s Purchasing Agent. Proposals for Mirror Lake Drainage Basin Improvements (RFP #21-0004PW) were opened on September 10, 2020 and proposals for East Lake Garden Drainage Basin Improvements (RFP #21-0003PW) were opened on September 9, 2020. The Mirror Lake project received eight (8) proposals while the East Lake Garden project received nine (9). All proposals were evaluated and rated in accordance with the criteria established in the Request for Proposals. The proposal evaluations are as provided below:

Mirror Lake Drainage Basin Improvements CONSULTANT LOCATION AVERAGE SCORE TOTAL COST Davis, Bowen & Friedel Milford, DE 83.0 $34,000 Century Engineering Dover, DE 78.2 $63,050 Pennoni Associates Newark, DE 71.4 $54,000 Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson Newark, DE 67.2 $116,927 Remington & Vernick Newark, DE 64.9 $76,332 Apex Engineering Newport, DE 63.5 $42,525 KCI Technologies Dover, DE 62.4 $52,562 Duffield Associates Dover, DE nonresponsive incomplete East Lake Garden Drainage Basin Improvements CONSULTANT LOCATION AVERAGE SCORE TOTAL COST Davis, Bowen & Friedel Milford, DE 85.5 $44,500 Century Engineering Dover, DE 81.5 $76,145 Pennoni Associates Newark, DE 79.0 $62,000 Bohler Engineering Rehobeth, DE 73.6 $53,250 Remington & Vernick Newark, DE 73.1 $75,868 Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson Newark, DE 72.9 $116,927 KCI Technologies Dover, DE 69.8 $57,237 Apex Engineering Newport, DE 64.0 $54,450 Duffield Associates Dover, DE nonresponsive incomplete City staff reviewed the submissions and found that the Davis, Bowen & Friedel proposals for both projects met all requirements for the qualifications of the projects and received the highest average score from the evaluators. The Department of Public Works will proceed with awarding these contracts to Davis, Bowen & Friedel in accordance with the purchasing policy for Professional Services under $50,000.

COMMITTEE INFORMATIONAL ITEM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Works DATE SUBMITTED: January 15, 2020 PREPARED BY: Sharon J. Duca, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Update on Silver Lake Dam Inspection REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: N/A REVIEWED BY: Matt Harline, Interim City Manager EXHIBITS: FY20 Silver Lake Dam Inspection Update Memorandum Silver Lake Dam 2020 Inspection Report EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: N/A FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): N/A BUDGETED IMPACT: N/A BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The Department of Public Works (DPW) utilizes a consultant to perform an annual inspection of the Silver Lake Dam. The FY20 inspection was performed on April 3, 2020 with final report provided on October 6, 2020. The next inspection will occur in the spring of 2021. The Silver Lake Dam 2020 Inspection Report provides the results of the field observations of the embankment dam, concrete spillway and drop inlet. The report also includes recommendations for repair and maintenance. The FY20 Silver Lake Dam Inspection Update provides a summary of the recommendations provided in the report. Action items are assigned to either the Parks & Recreation Department’s Ground Division or the DPW Engineering Division. The plan of action and/or status for the recommendations are included within the memorandum. The breakdown of the thirty-one (31) action items contained within the report is as follows: - 7 items complete or no further action required; - 11 items included within the P&R Grounds Division Annual Maintenance Checklist; - 2 items requiring further evaluation or monitoring by P&R; - 1 item to be developed into a future CIP by the DPW Engineering Division; - 4 items requiring further evaluation or monitoring by the DPW Engineering Division; and - 6 items included in the FY21 Silver Lake Dam Improvements CIP (to be bid out in February 2021).

MEMORANDUM Department of Public Works P.O. Box 475 Dover, Delaware 19903 Phone: (302) 736-7025 Fax: (302) 736-7092 E-mail: sduca@dover.de.us TO: Matthew C. Harline, Interim City Manager CC: Robin Eaton, Parks & Recreation Director FROM: Sharon J. Duca, P.E., Public Works Director DATE: January 14, 2020 SUBJECT: FY20 Silver Lake Dam Inspection Update Due to the projected cost of the project, a Request for Quotes to perform the FY20 Silver Lake Dam Inspection was sent out on March 4, 2020 to ten (10) consulting firms. One firm, Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson (JMT), responded to the request and was ultimately awarded the project. The Silver Lake Dam Inspection Report, originally dated April 30, 2020, last revised October 6, 2020, contains various recommendations necessary to maintain the dam in good working order. The tables below provide a summary of the recommendations as well as a status update of each. It should be noted that based upon the FY19 Silver Lake Dam Inspection report, a Silver Lake Dam Annual Maintenance Checklist for the Parks & Recreation Department Grounds Division was developed in January 2020. Due to the occurrence of COVID-19 in March 2020, the annual maintenance activities for 2020 were not started until after the FY20 Silver Lake Dam Inspection was performed. Since that time, annual maintenance activities have been performed and will continue to be performed. Some of the recommendations below added additional activities to the Annual Maintenance Checklist. CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ASSIGNMENT STATUS Upstream Control all weeds within the rip rap with herbicide Grounds Annual Maintenance Slope and remove. Checklist – 3x Per Year Remove accumulated trash along the water line at Grounds Annual Maintenance the west end of the left embankment. Checklist – 1x Per Year Monitor areas reseeded with grass to ensure full Grounds Annual Maintenance coverage. Fill in any that have not grown in with Checklist – 2x Per Year additional seed. Periodically monitor two small stumps near the Grounds Annual Maintenance signs near the boat ramp. Leave in place if no Checklist – 3x Per Year longer alive. Consider repairing asphalt roadway along the Engineering Future CIP proposal. crest of the embankment.

FY 2020 Silver Lake Dam Inspection Update January 14, 2021 Page 2 of 4 CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ASSIGNMENT STATUS Upstream Monitor depressions in the crest periodically. Engineering Continue to monitor. Slope (Depression holding water in left portion of crest of the left embankment noted in the FY19 report; not noted during FY20 inspection.) Fill gaps present in rip rap along right upstream Grounds Complete 10/2020. No embankment with additional rip rap. further action required. Downstream Control all weeds within the rip rap with herbicide Grounds Annual Maintenance Slope and remove. Checklist – 3x Per Year Cover bare spots on left side of the spillway with Grounds Annual Maintenance new grass. Checklist – 2x Per Year Periodically monitor woody bushes/weeds Grounds Annual Maintenance growing in the fence that cordons off bottom of Checklist – 2x Per Year fish ladder and near fish ladder sign. Leave in place if no longer alive. Replace No. 57 stone, between fish ladder and Engineering Not for erosion chain link fence, with rip rap if it is for erosion mitigation. No further mitigation. action required. Remediate eroded area with exposed tree roots Grounds Complete 10/2020. No on downhill side of upper portions of parking lot. further action required. Concrete Repair spalls in concrete wingwalls with epoxy Engineering FY21 Silver Lake Dam Spillway – concrete. Improvements CIP Upstream ($51,700 total). Face and Wing Repair crack in left wingwall with pressure Engineering FY21 Silver Lake Dam Walls injected epoxy. Improvements CIP ($51,700 total). Re-adjust rotated fence extension on left wingwall Grounds Completed 5/2020. No and secure to prevent rotation again. further action required. Concrete Rust stain, efflorescence and water leakage on Engineering FY21 Silver Lake Dam Spillway – right wingwall originating from a crack/spall in Improvements CIP Downstream concrete (suggests water penetrating from earth ($51,700 total). Face and Wing side of wall). Condition appears similar to that Walls observed in FY19 inspection. Not immediate concern but potential for issue in future. Investigate source of leaking water and condition of concrete to determine appropriate repair. Concrete Repair incipient spalls on left wingwall with epoxy Engineering FY21 Silver Lake Dam Spillway – concrete. Improvements CIP Downstream ($51,700 total). Face and Wing Walls

FY 2020 Silver Lake Dam Inspection Update January 14, 2021 Page 3 of 4 CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ASSIGNMENT SATUS Fish Ladder Repair broken weld splice on fish ladder support. Engineering Evaluate solution with consultant due to wet conditions. Monitor leaks noted to originate from joints in Engineering Monitor. fish ladder. Not considered significant enough to warrant repair at this time. Repair leaks if progress to show signs of structural fatigue. Pedestrian Repair joint material delamination on pier 6. Engineering FY21 Silver Lake Dam Walkway Improvements CIP ($51,700 total). Repair topside crack on span 4. Engineering FY21 Silver Lake Dam Improvements CIP ($51,700 total). Clean and paint guardrail posts and railings. Grounds P&R Director determined monitoring most appropriate response of this aesthetic item. Monitor sag in pedestrian bridge noted in FY19 Engineering Continue to monitor. report. Re-observe by structural engineer if signs of structural fatigue noted provide updated repair recommendations. Outlet Works Replace corroded hardware below the waterline Grounds Lake did not drawdown throughout the outlet structure. low enough to address in 10/2020. P&R researching utilizing an underwater contractor. Exit Channel Control all weeds within the rip rap with herbicide Grounds Annual Maintenance and remove. Checklist – 3x Per Year. Cover bare spots with new grass. Grounds Annual Maintenance Checklist – Quarterly Boat Dock Remove existing 2x decking and replace with new Grounds Completed 5/2020. No lumber and stainless-steel fasteners. further action required. Remove and replace existing rub rail. Grounds Completed 5/2020. No further action required. Boat Dock Replace 4 outboard cleats and provide new Grounds Completed 5/2020. No matching inboard cleats. further action required. General Monitor areas where new grass seed has been Grounds Annual Maintenance Maintenance planted for growth. Checklist – Quarterly Items

FY 2020 Silver Lake Dam Inspection Update January 14, 2021 Page 4 of 4 CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ASSIGNMENT STATUS General Remove weeds growing from joints between rip Grounds Annual Maintenance Maintenance rap stones and maintain to prevent further Checklist – Quarterly Items growth. TASK TOTALS 31 No further action required. 7 P&R Grounds Division – Annual Maintenance Checklist 11 P&R Grounds Division – Evaluate / Monitor 2 DPW Engineering Division – Future CIP proposal 1 DPW Engineering Division – Evaluate / Monitor 4 DPW FY21 Silver Lake Dam Improvements CIP ($51,700 total) 6

S I LV E R L A K E D A M DAM SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT Prepared for City of Dover Department of Public Works October 6, 2020 JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN & THOMPSON Engineerinl,! \ Brighier Fu/Ure ®

October 6, 2020 City of Dover Department of Public Works P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Attention: Mr. Bob LaFountain Project Manager Reference: Silver Lake Dam 2020 Inspection Final Report Dover, Delaware JMT Job No.: 20-01016-001 Dear Mr. Lyon: Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. (JMT) is pleased to submit this final results of our visual dam safety inspection of the Silver Lake Dam. This report contains the results of the dam safety inspection and a discussion of our observations and recommendations for remedial repairs for the existing dam. The following scope of work was performed: (1) Review previous dam safety inspection reports and available plans. (2) Perform field observations by geotechnical and structural engineers to determine the conditions of the crest, upstream and downstream slopes of the embankment dam and concrete spillway per DDSD’s checklist. (3) Perform underwater condition survey of the submerged portions of the concrete spillway and drop inlet including the sluice gate. (4) Prepare a written report to provide the results of the field observations of the embankment dam concrete spillway and drop inlet and recommendations for repairs and maintenance items that should be performed. It has been our pleasure to be of service to the City of Dover Department of Public Works. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN AND THOMPSON, INC. Patrick E. Ostrowski Michael E. Leffler, P.E. Associate Vice President Q 40 Wight Avenue, Hunt Valley, MD 21030 \. (410) 329-3100 (:.') www.jmt.com

SILVER LAKE DAM INSPECTION FINAL REPORT Dover, Delaware JMT Job No.: 20-01016-001 Prepared for: CITY OF DOVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P.O. BOX 475 DOVER, DELAWARE 19903 Submitted by: Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. 121 Continental Drive, Suite 300 Newark, Delaware, 19713 October 6, 2020 Q 40 Wight Avenue, Hun t Valley, MD 21030 \. (410) 329-3100 (:.') www.jmt.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 DAM INFORMATION 3 2.1 General................................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Embankment Dam .............................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Concrete Spillway................................................................................................................ 4 2.4 Outlet Works ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.5 Pedestrian Walkway ........................................................................................................... 5 3.0 OBSERVATIONS 6 3.1 General................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Earth Embankment ............................................................................................................. 6 3.2.1 Upstream Slope ...................................................................................................... 6 3.2.2 Downstream Slope ................................................................................................. 6 3.3 Concrete Spillway and Wing Walls ..................................................................................... 7 3.3.1 Upstream Face and Wing Walls ............................................................................. 7 3.3.2 Downstream Face and Wing Walls ........................................................................ 8 3.3.3 Fish Ladder ............................................................................................................. 8 3.4 Pedestrian Walkway ........................................................................................................... 8 3.5 Outlet Works ....................................................................................................................... 9 3.6 Exit Channel ........................................................................................................................ 9 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 10 4.1 General.............................................................................................................................. 10 4.2 Earth Embankment ........................................................................................................... 10 4.2.1 Upstream Slope .................................................................................................... 10 4.2.2 Downstream Slope ............................................................................................... 10 4.3 Concrete Spillway.............................................................................................................. 10 4.3.1 Upstream Face and Wing Walls ........................................................................... 10 4.3.2 Downstream Face and Wing Walls ...................................................................... 10 4.3.3 Fish Ladder ........................................................................................................... 11 4.4 Pedestrian Walkway ......................................................................................................... 11 4.5 Outlet Works ..................................................................................................................... 11 4.6 Exit Channel ...................................................................................................................... 11 5.0 CLOSING 11 APPENDICES Appendix A - Site Location Map Appendix B - Inspection Photos Appendix C - Delaware Dam Safety Inspection Checklist Appendix D – Cost Estimate Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Draft Inspection Report May 4, 2020

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Originally constructed in 1944, the Silver Lake Dam is an earthen embankment type dam with a concrete spillway located near its center. In order to drain the reservoir in emergency situations, a riser structure with a sluice gate and 24-inch pipe that outlets through the downstream face of the concrete spillways is located towards the western side of the concrete spillway. The base flow is controlled by a concrete chute that is located on the western side of the emergency spillway. Due to the failure implications and state guidelines, the Silver Lake Dam is classified as a high hazard dam. Failure of this dam has the high probability to cause loss of human life in addition to other consequences. As such, the City has requested JMT to perform an inspection of the dam and report our findings herein. JMT performed both above water and underwater inspections of the Silver Lake Dam on April 3, 2020 to assess the functionality of the dam and identify deficiencies and the need for remedial repairs. Our underwater inspections included the concrete spillway and the drop-inlet outlet works while visual observations of the above water components included the earth embankment, concrete spillway and wing walls, pedestrian walkway, drop-inlet outlet works, and the exit channel. Observations of the dam’s condition and recommendations made herein are intended to assist the City of Dover in programming the dam repairs in order to maintain safe operations of the dam. The following is a summary of our observations and recommendations: OBSERVATIONS: • Upstream Slope of Earthen Dam o Visual inspection indicates the slope is in generally good to very good condition. o Rip rap appears to be in good condition with the exception of some woody weeds were noted. o The Crest appears to be in good to very good condition with the exception of large bare areas were observed on the left and right sides of the boat ramp. New grass seed was planted in these areas and has not begun to germinate. o The concrete crack repairs located on the boat ramp and underneath the dock appeared to be adequately repaired and in good condition. o Some bare spots in the grass were noted near the end of the rip rap on the right upstream slope. • Downstream Slope of Earthen Dam o Visual inspection indicates the slope is in generally good to very good condition. o Some bare spots possibly due to mower disturbance were noted on the downstream slope left of the spillway. o Some woody bushes/weeds were noted growing in the fence that cordons off the bottom of the fish ladder, near the fish ladder sign at the left downstream slope and in the rip rap near the bottom of the fish ladder. o Some small stumps were noted near the gate for the fish ladder fence. o Some erosion exposing tree roots were noted near the upper portions of the parking lot. Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 1 October 6, 2020

• Concrete Spillway and Wing Walls o Water was flowing over the crest of the spillway at the time of the inspection; therefore, it was not possible to properly inspect the concrete surface. Visual inspection indicates the spillway is in generally good condition. o The wing walls were generally in good condition except for the following:  Concrete damage noted on the wing walls included cracks with efflorescence, spalls, pop-outs, and light to heavy abrasions with exposed aggregate were noted on the upstream and downstream faces. See the observations section of the report for additional details.  Two spalls were noted on the downstream left wingwall and one crack on the downstream right wingwall was noted to have rust staining. o The pond bottom was protected at the upstream edge of the spillway with approximately 1 to 1 ½ foot nominal size stone riprap, except between spans 2 through 4 where no riprap was noted. • Fish Ladder o Visual inspection indicates the fish ladder is in generally good condition with the exception of the following:  There are areas of mild to moderate corrosion of the steel support members.  A broken weld splice and leaks located at several of the joints along the fish ladder were noted. • Pedestrian Walkway o The pedestrian walkway was in fair condition with noted concrete damage included abrasions with exposed aggregate, failed repair, light cracking with efflorescence and honeycombing were noted. See the observations section of the report for additional details. • Drop-Inlet Outlet Works o The wooden outlet structure upstream of Span 8 is in satisfactory condition. o The sluice gate and all associated components are all in good condition. o The right downstream pile has heavy checking and heart rot with up to 50% section loss in the top 5 feet but is believed to be sacrificial and no repair is recommended at this time. o The sluice gate was not operated for evaluation. • Exit Channel o Rip rap and smaller stone was noted above the waterline in the fish ladder side of the stilling basin. • Boat Dock o The decking has splits and rotted areas. Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 2 October 6, 2020

RECOMMENDATIONS: This report contains observations and recommendations in accordance with dam safety regulations and standard inspection techniques for such facilities. Overall, results indicate that the dam is considered in good condition without the need for immediate remedial actions. However, JMT has identified several non-emergency remedial actions that we recommend become prioritized and programmed for action over the next two years. These remedial actions are summarized below and included in Section 4 of this report. Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 3 October 6, 2020

2.0 DAM INFORMATION 2.1 General The Silver Lake Dam is located within Silver Lake Park and is at the terminus of Lewis Mill Drive in Dover, Delaware as shown in Figure 1 and Appendix A of this report. The City of Dover requested JMT to perform an inspection of the dam based on Delaware state guidelines and sound engineering principles. The inspection of the dam occurred on April 3, 2020 and included above ground and below water inspections. Due to the lack of existing dam drawings, most dimensions mentioned in this report were estimated. Figure 1. Silver Lake Dam Location The Silver Lake Dam is classified as a high hazard dam in accordance with the Delaware Dam Safety guidelines. Based on its definition, a high hazard dam has the potential to cause probable loss of human life in the event of a dam failure or faulty operations. In addition, failure would cause economic loss, environmental damage, disruption of lifeline facilities, or can impact other concerns. The dam is located along the St. Jones River and is an earthen embankment dam with a length of approximately 630 feet. The dam’s western abutment is located near its intersection with the sandy beach. The dam consists of a concrete gravity dam spillway approximately 150 feet in length, which is located near the middle of the earthen dam. A boat ramp is located about 85 feet east of the east wall of the spillway. The dam’s outlet works consists of a wood riser structure with a 24-inch diameter cast iron pipe that exits the dam through the downstream toe of the concrete spillway on the eastern side. Figure 2 highlights the critical components of the dam. Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 4 October 6, 2020

Concrete Spillway ,, Outlet Works Structure I '' I ' '\._ I ' "- I ' Pedestrian Walkway I j ;- I I Earth Embankment Figure 2. Silver Lake Dam Inspection Components 2.2 Embankment Dam Based on measurements from the staff gauge located on the east wall of the concrete spillway, the dam’s top elevation is EL 20.0 and the downstream toe is EL 5.0, resulting in an overall dam height of approximately 15 feet. The crest width of the dam is about 20 feet at its narrowest point. The side slopes of the upstream face of the dam are roughly 3:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. The downstream slopes of the dam are 2:1, where the slopes are more gradual near the earthen portions of the dam at the east and west abutments, they are in the range of 5:1 or flatter. 2.3 Concrete Spillway The concrete dam spillway serves as both the principal and emergency spillway. The entrance and exit channels to the spillway consist of concrete gravity retaining walls. A concrete chute measuring about 2.5 feet wide (W) by 1.5 feet deep (D) is located on the east side of the spillway and is believed to have been designed to carry the base flow over the spillway. Flash boards are located in the upstream end of the concrete chute which can be removed to lower the lake about 1.5 feet below the top of the concrete spillway. A fish ladder is located between the east wing wall of the spillway and the base flow concrete chute. 2.4 Outlet Works The riser structure for the outlet works is located about 50 feet out into the lake for the top of the concrete spillway. The riser structure was constructed with timber materials and measures approximately 10 feet by 10 feet in plan dimensions. A 24-inch cast iron pipe extends from the downstream side of the riser structure and exits through the downstream side of the concrete spillway. A sluice gate is located on the upstream side of the riser structure and is believed to be used for reservoir drawdown in emergency situations. The sluice gate consists of a flat metal plate and stem. The stem can be accessed through a trap door in the top of the riser structure to raise and lower the sluice gate. Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 5 October 6, 2020

2.5 Pedestrian Walkway A pedestrian walkway is located on the top of the concrete spillway. The walkway measures 3 feet wide and was constructed with reinforced concrete. The walkway is supported by concrete piers fixed to the top of the concrete spillway. A chain link fence is located on each side of the walkway to act as a railing and fall protection. Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 6 October 6, 2020

3.0 OBSERVATIONS 3.1 General The Silver Lake Dam consists of an earthen embankment dam with a concrete spillway. JMT performed visual observations of the dam on April 3, 2020. In addition to ground inspections, JMT also performed underwater inspections with in-house diving crews. These inspections were performed simultaneously under the supervision of JMT engineers. Included in Appendix B are photographs taken during the inspection that represent the observations that are summarized below for the various dam components. The Delaware Dam Safety Inspection Checklist is included in Appendix C. Please note that all references regarding direction (i.e. left or right) are referenced as if the observer was facing downstream. Therefore, left was noted to be in the general east direction and right was noted to be in the general west direction. 3.2 Earth Embankment 3.2.1 Upstream Slope 1. Some trash and debris have collected upstream of the rip rap at the left upstream slope. (Photo 1) 2. Rip rap is in good condition with some woody weeds were noted left of the boat ramp. 3. Crest is in good to very good condition, with the exception of large bare areas that were noted on the left and right sides of the boat ramp. New grass seed was planted but has not yet germinated. (Photo 2) 4. Some 2 to 3 inch diameter woody stumps were noted near the signs and wooden bollards to the left of the boat ramp, and some asphalt has been placed along both sides of the boat ramp. (Photo 3) 5. The concrete crack repairs on the boat ramp appears to have been adequately repaired and in good condition, though a new crack has developed on the right side of the ramp. (Photo 4) 6. The concrete repair underneath the dock appears to have been adequately repaired and in good condition. (Photo 5) 7. Some weeds were noted in the rip rap along the left upstream slope. (Photo 6) 8. New rip rap has been placed along the left and right upstream wingwalls to address erosion. (Photos 7 and 8) 9. Some bushy weeds were noted in the rip rap and just uphill of the rip rap on the right upstream slope. (Photos 9 and 10) 10. Some gaps in the rip rap were noted on the right slope. 11. Some bare spots in the grass was noted near the end of the rip rap on the right upstream slope. (Photo 11) 12. A concrete slab measuring about 10 by 8 feet was noted in the crest of the right slope, approximately 50 feet from right wing wall. (Photo 12) 13. Moderate alligator cracking and a shoving failure was noted in the asphalt roadway near the upper parking area/crest of the left slope. (Photo 13) 3.2.2 Downstream Slope 1. New grass has grown to address previously noted bare spots near the right downstream wingwall. (Photo 14) Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 7 October 6, 2020

2. New rip rap has been placed along the lower portion of the right downstream wingwall to address previously noted erosion. (Photo 15) 3. Some bare spots possibly due to mower disturbance were noted on the left downstream slope. (Photo 16) 4. Some woody bushes/weeds were noted growing in the fence that cordons off the bottom of the fish ladder and near the fish ladder sign at the left downstream slope. (Photos 17 and 18) 5. No. 57 stone was noted to have been placed inside the fence near the fish ladder. 6. Some woody bushes/weeds were noted in the rip rap near the bottom of the fish ladder. (Photo 19) 7. Some small stumps were noted near the gate for the fish ladder fence. (Photo 20) 8. Some erosion exposing tree roots were noted near the upper portions of the parking lot. (Photo 21) 3.3 Concrete Spillway and Wing Walls 3.3.1 Upstream Face and Wing Walls Overall view of right wingwall (Photo 22) Overall view of left wingwall (Photo 23) 1. The upstream face is in good condition with areas of mild abrasion up to ¼” deep (D). 2. New stone riprap has been placed along the bank and covers the north end of the left wingwall. The delamination detected on the previous report was not accessible. 3. 5 feet south of the north end of the left wingwall, 1.4 feet above the mudline, there is a 4’L x up to 1”W horizontal crack. 4. 9 feet south of the north end of left wingwall, 2 feet above the waterline, there is a 12”L x 4”H x 1”D spall. 5. 12 feet south of the north end of the left wingwall, 4 feet above the mudline, there is a 5” diameter x ½”D spall. 6. There is a 1.2’L x 6”H x 2”D spall on the left wingwall where the wall meets the spillway. 7. There are fine cracks with efflorescence throughout the left and right wingwalls. 8. The left wingwall has a 14”H x ¼”D band of abrasion with exposed aggregate at the waterline. 9. The right wingwall has a 1’H x ¼”D band of abrasion with exposed aggregate at the waterline. 10. The right wingwall has random, small pop-outs up to 3”D throughout. 11. 10 feet south of the north end of the right wingwall, there is a 2’L x 6”H x 1”D area of heavy abrasion with exposed aggregate. 12. The pond bottom was protected at the upstream edge of the spillway with approximately 1 to 1 ½ foot nominal size stone riprap, except between spans 2 through 4 where no riprap was noted. The pond bottom consisted of silt and sand at this location. 13. The top fence extension on the left wingwall was rotated over. 3.3.2 Downstream Face and Wing Walls Overall view of right wingwall (Photo 24) Overall view of left wingwall (Photo 25) Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 8 October 6, 2020

1. The timber flash boards for the base concrete flow chute are in satisfactory condition. The stainless-steel angle has moderate corrosion and the hardware has mild corrosion. 2. The downstream toe of the spillway was in satisfactory condition with moderate abrasion up to ½”D. The toe is exposed the entire length with a vertical exposure of 5”-16”H. There is no undermining. 3. There is 8”-12” diameter riprap in the downstream channel and along the base of the exposed toe. 4. At the south end of the left wingwall there is a 6”L x 7”H x 1”D spall (Photo 26). 5. 10 feet south of the spillway on the left wingwall, 2.5 feet above the mudline, there is a 1SF incipient spall with rust staining (Photo 27). Note that the delamination observed in the previous report has progressed into a spall as noted. 6. 4 feet south of the spillway on the left wingwall, 2.5 feet above the mudline, there is a 0.5SF incipient spall with rust staining (Photo 28). 7. 25 feet north of the south end on the right wingwall, there is fine cracking with rust staining (Photo 29). 8. The right wingwall has fine diagonal cracks with efflorescence throughout (Photo 24). 9. There is a 7”H x ¼”D band of abrasion with exposed aggregate along the base of each wingwall. 3.3.3 Fish Ladder Overall view of fish ladder (Photo 30) 1. The stainless-steel fish ladder was in good condition. 2. There are areas of mild to moderate corrosion of the steel support members with up to 10% section loss. 3. The 6th support from the downstream end has a broken weld splice (Photo 31 and 32). 4. There were leaks located at several of the joints along the fish ladder. The pin hole leak noted in the previous report was not observed during this inspection, possibly because it was clogged or due to less turbulent flow. 3.3.4 Spillway Overall view of spillway (Photo 33) 1. Water was flowing over the crest of the spillway at the time of the inspection; therefore, it was not possibly to properly inspect the concrete surface. 2. There appeared to soft marine growth and moderate abrasion throughout the face of the spillway and the downstream apron. 3.4 Pedestrian Walkway (spans numbered from right to left) 1. There is light to moderate abrasion up to ½”D with exposed aggregate, located from the waterline down on all piers. 2. Pier 2 has a failed repair on the top of the right face and has left a 2’L x 3”H x 1”D spall (Photo 34). 3. There is fine cracking with efflorescence in the repaired area under spans 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9 (Span 4 Photo 35, Span 9 Photo 36). 4. There is mild honeycombing of the concrete under span 3. 5. Pier 6 has corner edge abrasion on the top right side 18”L x 6”H x 1”D (Photo 37). Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 9 October 6, 2020

6. Pier 6 has delamination of joint material topside. 7. Pier 7 has corner edge abrasion on the top left side 12”L x 2”H x 1”D, and on the right side near the waterline 8”L x 3”H x 1”D (Photos 38 and 39). 8. The water level at the time of the inspection was 4.1 feet below the bottom of the walkway. 9. Span 4 contains a diagonal crack (approx. 12” long) topside near pier 4. 10. The guard rails on the walkway are rusted and in fair to poor condition. 3.5 Outlet Works 1. The wooden outlet structure upstream of Span 8 is in satisfactory condition. There is a light covering of soft marine growth and minor checks in the timber elements with up to 1/16”D penetration with an awl. 2. The trash rack and fencing are in good condition. 3. The sluice gate and all associated components – frame, stops, wedges, seal, stem guide, and hardware – are all in good condition. 4. The timber structure’s galvanized hardware is in poor condition below the water with up to 30% section loss (photos unavailable due to water clarity). 5. The floor slab beneath the gate has mild abrasion with exposed aggregate. 6. There was ½”D of silt covering the floor slab. 7. The right downstream pile has heavy checking and heart rot with up to 50% section loss in the top 5 feet. These piles are believed to be sacrificial (Photo 40). 8. There was approximately 8 feet of water above the top of the sluice gate at the time of the inspection. 9. The sluice gate was not operated for evaluation. 3.6 Exit Channel 1. Water was flowing through the exit channel, therefore it was not possible to visually observe the bottom of the exit channel. However, divers walked in the exist channel downstream of the spillway. 2. Some bushy/woody weeds were noted at the base of the rip rap along the right side of the exit channel. (Photos 41 and 42) 3. Many bare spots were noted along both the left and right sides of the exit channel. (Photo 43) 4. Rip rap and smaller stone was noted above the waterline in the fish ladder side of the stilling basin. 3.7 Boat Dock 1. The boat dock was observed to be in fair to poor condition. 2. The decking has splits and rotted areas. 3. The four outboard cleats are in good condition. One inboard cleat is missing, the other inboard cleat does not match the others. 4. The existing rub rail is damaged and detached from the dock. Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 10 October 6, 2020

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 General Based on our observations, we consider the dam in good condition and not in danger of failure. The results of our observations indicated that there are various components of the dam that need remedial repair. These repairs are not considered critical and do not require immediate attention. However, we recommend that these repairs be prioritized and programmed to be addressed in the next one to two years to prevent further problems that could lead to failure. The following parts of this section detail recommendations for specific remedial actions categorized by its location. The remedial repairs are also outlined in the Delaware Dam Safety Inspection Checklist is included in Appendix C. 4.2 Earth Embankment 4.2.1 Upstream Slope 1. All weeds noted within the rip rap should be controlled with herbicide and removed. 2. The trash that has accumulated along the water line at the west end of the left embankment should be removed. 3. Monitor the areas that have been reseeded with grass to ensure full coverage and fill in any that have not germinated with additional seed. 4. The two small stumps near the signs near the boat ramp can be left in place provided they are no longer alive and should be monitored periodically. 5. Consideration should be given to repair the asphalt roadway along the crest of the embankment. 6. A depression that was holding water was noted in the left portion of the crest of the left embankment in the 2019 report but was not noted during the current inspection. Depressions in the crest should be monitored periodically. 7. Any gaps present in the rip rap along the right upstream embankment should be filled with additional rip rap. 4.2.2 Downstream Slope 1. All weeds noted within the rip rap should be removed and controlled with herbicide so future weeds do not grow. 2. The bare spots on left side of the spillway should be seeded and covered with new grass. 3. The woody bushes/weeds that were noted growing in the fence that cordons off the bottom of the fish ladder and near the fish ladder sign can be left in place provided they are no longer alive and should be monitored periodically. 4. It was unknown what the purpose of the No. 57 stone noted between the fish ladder and the chain link fence is. If it is for erosion mitigation, it should be replaced with rip rap. 5. Remediate the eroded area with exposed tree roots on the downhill side of the upper portions of the parking lot 4.3 Concrete Spillway and Wing Walls 4.3.1 Upstream Face and Wing Walls 1. Repair the spalls in the concrete wingwalls with epoxy concrete. 2. Repair the crack in the left wingwall with pressure injected epoxy. 3. Re-adjust rotated fence extension on left wingwall and secure to prevent rotation again. Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 11 October 6, 2020

4.3.2 Downstream Face and Wing Walls 1. Repair the incipient spalls on the left wingwall with epoxy concrete. 2. The rust stain, efflorescence, and water leakage on the right wingwall appears to be originating from a crack/spall in the concrete/ which suggests water is penetrating from the earth side of the wall. The condition of the rust stain and water leakage appears similar to the condition observed in the 2019 inspection. Though there is no immediate concern, if it is left alone there could be a potential issue in the future. The source of the water leaking and condition of the concrete should be investigated to determine an appropriate repair. 4.3.3 Fish Ladder 1. Repair broken weld splice on the fish ladder support. 2. The leaks noted to originate from joints in the fish ladder are not considered significant enough to warrant repair, at this time. However, the leaks should be monitored and if they progress to show signs of structural fatigue they should be repaired. 4.4 Pedestrian Walkway 1. Repair joint material delamination on Pier 6. 2. Repair topside crack on Span 4. 3. Clean and paint guardrail posts and railings. Secure any loose fencing to the railing posts with appropriate non-corrosive wire ties. 4. Continue to monitor the sag in the pedestrian bridge noted in the previous report. If signs of structural fatigue are noted, they should be reobserved by a structural engineer to provide updated recommendations on the need for repair. 4.5 Outlet Works 1. Replace corroded hardware below the waterline throughout the outlet structure. 4.6 Exit Channel 1. All weeds noted within the rip rap should be controlled with herbicide and removed. 2. The bare spots should be covered with new grass. 4.7 Boat Dock 1. Remove the existing decking and replace with new lumber and stainless-steel fasteners. 2. Remove and replace the existing rub rail. 3. Replace the 4 outboard cleats and provide new matching inboard cleats. Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 12 October 6, 2020

5.0 CLOSING This report has been prepared to provide the City of Dover with the results of observations and recommendations for remedial repairs that should be performed on the dam. This report is intended to provide the City of Dover with the necessary information to program on going repairs and maintenance of the dam. The report scope is limited to recommendations pertaining to specific scope of the project and the location described. Silver Lake Dam Safety Inspection Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Page 13 October 6, 2020

Site Vicinity Map N Silver Lake Dam Dover, Delaware JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN &THOMPSON

Photo 1. Trash along left upstream slope Photo 2. Bare areas where new grass seed has been placed adjacent to boat ramp

Photo 3. Old stumps and new asphalt to remediate erosion along boat ramp. New crack in boat ramp Photo 4. New crack in boat ramp.

Photo 5. Concrete repair beneath boat ramp. Photo 6. Weeds in rip rap along left upstream slope.

Photo 7. New rip rap along left upstream wing wall. Photo 8. New rip rap along right upstream wing wall.

Photo 9. Weeds in rip rap on right upstream slope. Photo 10. Weeds uphill of rip rap on right upstream slope.

Photo 11. Bare spots in grass near end of upstream slope. Photo 12. Concrete slab in crest of right slope

Photo 13. Pavement failures in crest of left slope Photo 14. New grass on downstream side of right embankment.

Photo 15. New rip rap along right downstream wing wall. Photo 16. Bare spots on left downstream slope.

Photo 17. Bush/weeds growing in fence on left downstream slope. Photo 18. Bush growing in fence near fish ladder sign.

Photo 19. Woody bushes/weeds in rip rap near bottom of fish ladder. Photo 20. Stumps near fence gate surrounding fish ladder.

Photo 21. Erosion with exposed roots noted on downstream slope of upper parking area. Photo 22. Overall view of right wing wall

Photo 23. Overall view of left upstream wingwall. Photo 24. Overall view of right upstream wingwall.

Photo 25. Overall view of left wing wall and fish ladder. Photo 26. Spall on left wing wall beneath fish ladder.

Photo 27. 1SF incipient spall with rust staning on left wing wall. Photo 28. 0.5SF incipient spall with rust staining on left wing wall.

Photo 29. Fine cracking with rust staning on right wing wall. Photo 30. Overall view of fish ladder.

Photo 31. Broken weld splice on 6th support from downstream end. Photo 32. Broken weld splice on 6th support from downstream end.

Photo 33. Overall view of spillway. Photo 34. Failed repair at top of right face and noted spall.

Photo 35. Fine cracks/efflorescence Span 4. Photo 36. Fine cracks/efflorescence Span 9.

Photo 37. Pier 6 corner edge abrasion. Photo 38. Pier 7 corner edge abrasion on top left side.

Photo 39. Pier 7 corner edge abrasion on bottom right side near water line. Photo 40. Right downstream pile with estimated 50% section loss.

Photo 41. Bushy/weeds along right side downstream channel. Photo 42. Bushy/weeds along right side downstream channel.

Photo 43. Typical bare spots noted along left and right sides of exit channel.

Delaware Dam Safety Program Visual Inspection Checklist This general checklist should be used as an aid when examining all dams. This checklist may not, however, include all features or conditions found at a specific dam that are relevant to the safety of that dam. All features integral to the safety of the dam being examined should be inspected and their condition reported. TYPE OF INSPECTION: (Regular, Formal or Informal): FORMAL DE INSPECTION YEAR: 2020 DAM NAME: Silver Lake Dam NID ID: S137 STATE ID: DE00031 LOCATION: St. Jones River, Dover, DE OWNER: The City of Dover, DE OPERATOR: DATE OF INSPECTION: April 3, 2020 RESERVOIR INFORMATION Normal Reservoir Elevation (ft): N/A Reservoir Elevation at time of inspection (ft): N/A WEATHER CONDITIONS (including recent rainfall): Sunny, windy, 50 degrees F Page 1

INSPECTION PERSONNEL Delaware Licensed Professional Engineer(s): Name Affiliation Michael E. Leffler, P.E. Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Assisted By: Name Affiliation Patrick E. Ostrowski, P.E. Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson Nicholas Leonard, P.E. Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson Kevin Reinhard Atlantic Engineering (A JMT Company) Alex Hierl Atlantic Engineering (A JMT Company) DNREC Dam Safety Program Representative(s): Name Affiliation Dam Owner Representative(s): Name Affiliation Paul Thompson Dover DPW Others: Name Affiliation Page 2

2008 DELAWARE DAM INVENTORY INFORMATION (provided by DNREC): HISTORY Date Constructed:1944 Dates(s) Reconstructed: N/A Designer: N/A Constructed By: N/A Owner & Address:The City of Dover, DE 19903 Owner/Operator present during inspection (yes or no): NO PREVIOUS INSPECTIONS Last Inspection: Last Regular Inspection: May 28, 2019 Phase I Inspection: January 1978 Last Formal Inspection: List all recommendations from previous inspection reports and note whether those items have been completed: Immediate Repairs No immediate repairs required. Non-Immediate Repairs Upstream Slope • All weeds noted within the rip rap should be controlled with herbicide and removed. Not completed • The trash that has accumulated along the water line at the west end of the left embankment should be removed. Continue to monitor - Some trash was noted during the inspection • The depression in the crest noted at the east end of the left embankment should be monitored to see if it is still holding water during better weather and filled in and seeded. Depression not detected, further monitoring required. • All bare spots along the left and right embankments should be seeded. Completed • The two small stumps near the No Parking sign can be left in place provided it is no longer alive and should be monitored periodically. Continue to monitor. • Further erosion along each of the wing walls on the should be mitigated by preventing concentrated flow adjacent to the wing wall or by placement of rip-rap. Completed • Missing rip rap noted along the right embankment should be replaced. Not completed Downstream Slope 1. The bare spots on either side of the spillway should be covered with new grass. Partially completed 2. It was unknown what the purpose of the No. 57 stone noted between the fish ladder and the chain link fence is. If it is for erosion mitigation, it should be replaced with rip rap. Not completed 3. It was unknown if the bare spot at the base of the right wing wall was due to erosion. The area should be remediated with rip rap. Not Completed Upstream Face and Wing Walls 1. All spalled concrete noted on the wing walls should be repaired. Not Completed 2. All delaminations noted in the left upstream wing wall should be repaired. Not Completed 3. Repair cracks in left wingwall. Not Completed 4. The north end of the left concrete abutment should be repaired with concrete patching material. Not Completed Downstream Face and Wing Walls 1. All spalled concrete noted on the wing walls should be repaired. Not Completed Page 3

2. The rust stain and the water leakage on the right-wing wall appears to be originating from a crack/spall in the concrete (behind the parge), which suggests water is penetrating from the earth-side of the wall (note that the 2014 and 2018 inspection documented rusting in this same location). The condition of the rust stain and water leakage appears to be worse than observed during the 2018 Inspection. Though there is no immediate concern, if left alone, there could be a potential issue in the future. The condition of the concrete and source of water leakage should be investigated and to determine appropriate repair. Note that the delamination observed in the 2018 report has progressed into a spall as noted. Not Completed Fish Ladder 1. Repair broken weld splice on the fish ladder support. Not Completed 2. Repair the leak near the steel frame support. Continue to monitor – Pinhole leak not observed during this inspection, noted leaks were from joints and are not significant enough to warrant repair, at this time leaks should be monitored for structural fatigue that would warrant repair. Pedestrian Walkway 1. Provide railing extensions (similar to the existing railing on the pedestrian walkway) on the entire right wing wall and upstream portion of left wing wall to increase the height from 36 inches to 42 inches minimum. Completed 2. Though no immediate action is required, the sag in the concrete walkway planks should continue to be monitored. Continue to monitor 3. Railings should be recoated, and the chain link infill should be securely attached with more wire ties at loose locations. Not Completed 4. The crack on the walkway at Span 4, as well as the spall on top of Pier 6, should be repaired. Other areas of spalling, efflorescence and honeycombing should also be repaired. Not Completed Outlet Works 1. Replace corroded hardware below the waterline throughout the outlet structure. Not Completed Exit Channel 1. Provide vegetation for the bare spots and remove the weeds noted adjacent to the riprap that lines the banks of the channel. Not Completed Boat Dock • Remove the existing 2x decking and replace with new lumber and stainless-steel fasteners. Not Completed • Remove and replace the existing rub rail. Not Completed • Salvage and replace the 4 outboard cleats and provide two new matching inboard cleats. Not Completed EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN (Required for all High and Significant Hazard dams) Date of Approved Plan: N/A Date of Plan Revision: N/A Is the notification flowchart complete and current? (If the notification flow chart is not complete and current, all modifications, corrections, and additions must be made and replacement pages submitted with this report) Is inundation mapping or a description included? N/A Are emergency materials and equipment identified? N/A When was the plan last tested? Page 4

DOWNSTREAM HAZARD CLASSIFICATIONS Present Hazard Classification: High Changes in Downstream Land Use and Habitation: No Is present classification appropriate? Yes OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Date of Operation and Maintenance Plan: N/A Are instructions adequate? N/A Do operating personnel follow instructions? N/A What are operating personnel capabilities? N/A EXAMINATION OF EMBANKMENT DAMS Page 5

DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE Embankment Material: Earth Cutoff Type: Unknown Impervious Core: Unknown Internal Drainage System: Outlets of a drainage system was not observed, which may indicate that one is not present. Movement (Horizontal and Vertical Alignment): None Observed Junctions with Abutments or Embankments: Good Condition. Erosion previously noted on upstream sides of left and right abutments has been covered with rip rap Miscellaneous: None CREST Vertical Alignment: Good Horizontal Alignment: Good Surface Cracks: None Observed Settlement: None Observed Unusual Conditions: None Observed UPSTREAM SLOPE Slope (Estimate) (H:V): 3H:1V Trees, Undesirable Growth or Debris, Animal Burrows: Upstream Slope in good to very good condition except as noted below. No animal burrows observed. 1. The rip-rap on both left and right slopes appeared to be in good condition, with some small to medium weeds noted. 2. Trash and debris accumulation was noted in the water at the end of the left upstream embankment. 3. The rip rap along the right upstream embankment was noted to be in good condition, though the rip rap appeared to be missing in one location. 4. Some small to moderate bare spots were noted in the upstream right embankment approximately 100 feet right of the wing wall. 5. New grass seed in areas adjacent to boat ramp should be monitored for growth. Sloughing, Subsidence or Depressions: 1. None observed. Slope Protection: 1. Riprap at water line was in very good condition with some weeds growing from the joints between the riprap stones Surface Cracks or Movement at Toe: 1. None observed. Unusual Conditions: 1. None observed. DOWNSTREAM SLOPE Page 6

Slope (Estimate) (H:V): Variable 2H:1V to flatter than 5H:1V Trees, Undesirable Growth or Debris, Animal Burrows: Downstream Slope in good to very good condition except as noted below. No animal burrows observed. 1. All weeds noted within the rip rap should be controlled with herbicide and removed. 2. The bare spots on left side of the spillway should be covered with new grass. 3. The woody bushes/weeds that were noted growing in the fence that cordons off the bottom of the fish ladder and near the fish ladder sign can be left in place provided they are no longer alive and should be monitored periodically. 4. It was unknown what the purpose of the No. 57 stone noted between the fish ladder and the chain link fence is. If it is for erosion mitigation, it should be replaced with rip rap. 5. Remediate the eroded area with exposed tree roots on the downhill side of the upper portions of the parking lot. Sloughing, Subsidence or Depressions: None observed Surface Cracks or Movement at Toe: None observed Seepage: None observed External Drainage System (Ditches, Trenches, Blanket): None observed Condition Around Outlet Structure: 1. Stilling basin at toe of concrete spillway in good conditions. No signs of seepage, boils or undermining of concrete spillway. Unusual Conditions: None observed ABUTMENTS AND TOE AREA Erosion at Contract: None observed Seepage or Wet Area Along Contract: None observed Signs of Movement: None observed Depressions, Sinkholes: None observed Unusual Conditions: None observed SEEPAGE OR TOE DRAIN FLOW MEASUREMENTS: NOT APPLICABLE Location Estimated Flow Color (Turbidity) OTHER CONDITIONS/OBSERVATIONS: NONE Page 7

EXAMINATION OF SPILLWAYS AND OUTLET WORKS TYPE(S) AND DESCRIPTION OF SPILLWAY(S) Primary: Concrete Dam Spillway with base flow chute with flash boards on west side of spillway Secondary (auxiliary): None Emergency: Combined with Primary Spillway Low Level Outlet (flashboards, operable gates, etc.): Wood riser structure with sluice gate Other: FOR EACH SPILLWAY THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS MUST BE EXAMINED WHERE APPROPRIATE ENTRANCE CHANNEL Description: Cast in place concrete wing walls Vegetation (Trees, Bushes): None Observed Debris: None Channel Side-Slope Stability: Concrete Wing walls were observed to be vertical and in good to very good condition. Slope Protection/Erosion: Rip rap has been placed to remediate erosion along right wing wall and in good condition. Unusual Conditions: None observed SPILLWAY CREST Description: Concrete Condition of Material: 1. Water was breaching overtop the crest of the spillway; therefore, could not clearly see the concrete surface. 2. The mudline is protected with approximately 1’ to 1 ½’ nominal size stone rip rap except, between spans 2 through 4 in which the mudline is sand and silt. Signs of Movement: None Observed Joints: Good Condition Unusual Conditions: None Observed DROP BOX N/A Description: N/A Condition of Material: N/A Signs of Movement: N/A Joints: N/A Floor: N/A Page 8

Unusual Conditions: N/A SPILLWAY WING WALLS AND DOWNSTREAM APRON Description: Concrete Condition of Material: 1. The timber flash boards for the base concrete flow chute are in satisfactory condition. The stainless-steel angle has moderate corrosion and the hardware has mild corrosion. 2. The downstream toe of the spillway was in satisfactory condition with moderate abrasion up to ½”D. The toe is exposed the entire length with a vertical exposure of 5”-16”H. There is no undermining. 3. There is 8”-12” diameter riprap in the downstream channel and along the base of the exposed toe. 4. At the south end of the left wingwall there is a 6”L x 7”H x 1”D spall. 5. 10 feet south of the spillway on the left wingwall, 2.5 feet above the mudline, there is a 1SF incipient spall with rust staining. 6. 4 feet south of the spillway on the left wingwall, 2.5 feet above the mudline, there is a 0.5SF incipient spall with rust staining. 7. 25 feet north of the south end on the right wingwall, there is fine cracking with rust staining. 8. The right wingwall has fine diagonal cracks with efflorescence throughout. 9. There is a 7”H x ¼”D band of abrasion with exposed aggregate along the base of each wingwall. Signs of Movement: None Joints: See above Drains: Weep holes See above Unusual Conditions: None DOWNSTREAM APRON Description: Concrete Condition of Material: Could not be observed due to water flow. Signs of Movement: Could not be observed due to water flow. Unusual Conditions: Could not be observed due to water flow. CULVERTS Description: 24-inch diameter cast iron pipe from low level outlet works penetrates downstream apron Condition of Material: Could not be observed due to water flow Joints: Could not observe. Recommend next inspection include video inspection of inside of the pipe. Signs of Movement: None observed at end of pipe. Seepage: None observed Location Estimated Flow Turbidity Unusual Conditions: TRASH RACKS Description: N/A Page 9

Condition of Material: N/A Unusual Conditions: N/A CHUTES Description: Base flow concrete chute located on west side of downstream apron with wood flash boards Condition of Material: Signs of Movement: None observed Unusual Conditions: None observed STILLING BASIN Description: 6 to 18-inch size stone riprap Condition of Material: Good with no signs of seepage and boils observed to be present Signs of Movement: None observed Erosion: None observed Unusual Conditions: None observed EXIT CHANNEL Vegetation (Trees, Bushes): Some minor vegetation was observed to be growing in riprap that lined the entrance channel at the end of the wing walls for the downstream apron. Debris: None observed Channel Side-Slope Stability: Good Condition. No signs of stability problems. Erosion: Some erosion and bare spots noted Unusual Conditions: None observed LOW LEVEL OUTLET Description: Wood riser structure with sluice gate Condition: 1. The wooden outlet structure upstream of Span 8 is in satisfactory condition. There is a light covering of soft marine growth and minor checks in the timber elements with up to 1/16”D penetration with an awl. 2. The trash rack and fencing is in good condition. 3. The sluice gate and all associated components – frame, stops, wedges, seal, stem guide, and hardware – are all in good condition. 4. The timber structure’s galvanized hardware is in poor condition below the water with up to 30% section loss (photos unavailable due to water clarity). 5. The floor slab beneath the gate has mild abrasion with exposed aggregate. 6. There was ½”D of silt covering the floor slab. 7. The right downstream pile has heavy checking and heart rot with up to 50% section loss in the top 5 feet. These piles are believed to be sacrificial (Photo 0836, overall 0837). 8. There was approximately 8 feet of water above the top of the sluice gate at the time of the inspection. 9. The sluice gate was not operated for evaluation. Trash Rack: Appears to be in good condition Leakage: None observed Page 10

Location Estimated Flow Unusual Conditions: None observed Was the low level outlet operated during the inspection? No however sluice gate was reported operational in memo dated 9/26/13 from Sharon Duca, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer. Were there difficulties operating the low level outlet? N/A When was the low level outlet last operated and did this conform with the Operation and Maintenance procedures? N/A Miscellaneous: None STILLING BASIN FOR LOW LEVEL OUTLET Description: Combined with stilling basin for combined principal and emergency spillways. See description above. Condition of Material: 1. The exit channel was observed to be in good condition. 2. The banks of the channel were lined with 1 to 2-foot diameter size riprap observed to be in good condition. 3. Several bare spots and some weeds were noted in the landscape areas directly adjacent to the riprap along the banks of the channel. Signs of Movement: None observed Erosion: None observed Unusual Conditions: None observed EXIT CHANNEL FOR LOW LEVEL OUTLET Description (Trees, Bushes): Debris: Channel Side-Slope Stability: Slope Protection Erosion: Unusual Conditions: Page 11

EXAMINATION OF CONCRETE AND MASONRY DAMS DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE Type of Dam (Gravity, Arch, etc.): Internal Drainage System: Movement (Horizontal and Vertical Alignment): Miscellaneous: UPSTREAM FACE Condition of Concrete or Masonry: Cracking: Location Orientation Length Width Type DOWNSTREAM FACE Condition of Concrete or Masonry: Cracking: Location Orientation Length Width Type Leakage through Dam (Location and Estimated Flow): CREST Condition of Concrete or Masonry: Cracking Location Orientation Length Width Type Signs of Movement: Differential Movement (Joint or Crack Separation or Offset): GALLERIES Cracking Location Orientation Length Width Type Differential Movement (Joint or Crack Separation): Leakage into Galleries (Location and Estimated Flow): Condition of Gallery Drains: Page 12

FOUNDATION Condition of Rock or Concrete Lining: Cracking: Signs of Movement: Seepage (Location and Estimated Flow): ABUTMENTS AND TOE AREA Seepage or Wet Areas: Signs of Movement: Cracking: Erosion: Unusual Conditions: Page 13

EXAMINATION OF OTHER FEATURES INSTRUMENTATION (Monumentation/Surveys, Observation Wells, Weirs, Piezometers, etc.) location, condition: No Instrumentations except for reservoir staff gauge was present (A separate report including instrument readings, condition of instruments, observations, and conclusions based upon the collected data should be attached.) RESERVOIR Slopes: Good Condition Sedimentation: Could not be observed Unusual Conditions Which Affect Dam: None observed Other Unusual Conditions: None observed APPURTENANT STRUCTURES Description and Condition of Each: Fish Ladder 1. The stainless-steel fish ladder was in good condition. 2. There are areas of mild to moderate corrosion of the steel support members with up to 10% section loss. 3. The 6th support from the downstream end has a broken weld splice. 4. There were leaks located at several of the joints along the fish ladder. Pedestrian Walkway over Spillway 1. There is light to moderate abrasion up to ½”D with exposed aggregate, located from the waterline down on all piers. 2. Pier 2 has a failed repair on the top of the right face and has left a 2’L x 3”H x 1”D spall. 3. There is fine cracking with efflorescence in the repaired area under spans 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9. 4. There is mild honeycombing of the concrete under span 3. 5. Pier 6 has corner edge abrasion on the top right side 18”L x 6”H x 1”D. 6. Pier 6 has delamination of joint material topside. 7. Pier 7 has corner edge abrasion on the top left side 12”L x 2”H x 1”D, and on the right side near the waterline 8”L x 3”H x 1”D. 8. The water level at the time of the inspection was 4.1 feet below the bottom of the walkway. 9. Span 4 contains a diagonal crack (approx. 12” long) topside near pier 4. 10. The guard rails on the walkway are rusted and in fair to poor condition. Page 14

RECOMMENDATIONS THE FOLLOWING REPAIRS SHOULD BE MADE IMMEDIATELY: No immediate repairs required THE FOLLOWING NON-IMMEDIATE REPAIRS/IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD BE MADE: Upstream Slope 1. All weeds noted within the rip rap should be controlled with herbicide and removed. 2. The trash that has accumulated along the water line at the west end of the left embankment should be removed. 3. Monitor the areas that have been reseeded with grass to ensure full coverage and fill in any that have not grown in with additional seed. 4. The two small stumps near the signs near the boat ramp can be left in place provided it is no longer alive and should be monitored periodically. 5. Consideration should be given to repair the asphalt roadway along the crest of the embankment. 6. Although not observed, continue to monitor for the depression in the left crest noted in the 2019 report. Downstream Slope 1. All weeds noted within the rip rap should be controlled with herbicide and removed. 2. The bare spots on left side of the spillway should be covered with new grass. 3. The woody bushes/weeds that were noted growing in the fence that cordons off the bottom of the fish ladder and near the fish ladder sign can be left in place provided they are no longer alive and should be monitored periodically. 4. It was unknown what the purpose of the No. 57 stone noted between the fish ladder and the chain link fence is. If it is for erosion mitigation, it should be replaced with rip rap. 5. Remediate the eroded area with exposed tree roots on the downhill side of the upper portions of the parking lot Upstream Face and Wing Walls 1. Repair the spalls in the concrete wingwalls with epoxy concrete. 2. Repair the crack in the left wingwall with pressure injected epoxy. 3. Re-adjust rotated fence extension on left wingwall and secure to prevent rotation again. Downstream Face and Wing Walls 1. Repair the incipient spalls on the left wingwall with epoxy concrete. 2. The rust stain, efflorescence, and water leakage on the right wingwall appears to be originating from a crack/spall in the concrete/ which suggests water is penetrating from the earth side of the wall. The condition of the rust stain and water leakage appears similar to the condition observed in the 2019 inspection. Though there is no immediate concern, if it is left alone there could be a potential issue in the future. The source of the water leaking and condition of the concrete should be investigated to determine an appropriate repair. Fish Ladder 1. Repair broken weld splice on the fish ladder support. Pedestrian Walkway 1. Repair joint material delamination on pier 6. 2. Repair topside crack on span 4. 3. Clean and paint guardrail posts and railings. Outlet Works 1. Replace corroded hardware below the waterline throughout the outlet structure. Exit Channel 1. All weeds noted within the rip rap should be controlled with herbicide and removed. 2. The bare spots should be covered with new grass. Boat Dock 1. Provide vegetation for the bare spots and remove the weeds noted adjacent to the rip rap that lines the banks of the channel. 2. Remove the existing 2x decking and replace with new lumber and stainless-steel fasteners. Page 15

THE FOLLOWING MAINTENANCE ITEMS SHOULD BE COMPLETED: 1. Area where new grass seed has been planted should be monitored for growth 2. Weeds growing from the joints between the rip rap stones should be removed and maintained to prevent further growth. THE FOLLOWING ENGINEERING ANALYSIS/STUDIES SHOULD BE PERFORMED: X Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis  Embankment Stability Analysis X Dam Failure Analysis/Inundation Mapping X Other: Structural design of concrete walkway over concrete spillway  None Page 16

CONDITION ASSESSMENT Silver Lake Dam was personally inspected by me and was found to be in the following condition (select one only):  SATISFACTORY No existing or potential dam safety deficiencies are recognized. Acceptable performance is expected under all loading conditions (static, hydrologic, seismic) in accordance with the applicable regulatory criteria or tolerable risk guidelines. X FAIR No existing dam safety deficiencies are recognized for normal loading conditions. Rare or extreme hydrologic and/or seismic events may result in a dam safety deficiency. Risk may be in the range to take further action.  POOR A dam safety deficiency is recognized for loading conditions which may realistically occur. Remedial action is necessary. POOR may also be used when uncertainties exist as to critical analysis parameters which identify a potential dam safety deficiency. Further investigations and studies are necessary.  UNSATISFACTORY A dam safety deficiency is recognized that requires immediate or emergency remedial action for problem resolution. Delaware Registered Professional Engineer Performing Condition Assessment: Name Michael E. Leffler DE PE License Number: 16329 Affiliation (Agency/Company) Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson, Inc. Signature _____________________________________ Date: April 30, 2020 Delaware Dam Safety Program Concurrence with Condition Assessment: Name _____________________________________DE PE License Number______________ Signature _____________________________________ Date _________________________ Dam Owner Acknowledgement of Condition Assessment: Name _____________________________________Title_______________________________ Signature _____________________________________ Date _________________________ Page 17

Appendix D – Cost Estimate Item Description Estimated Cost Rip Rap Repair Clearing and Grubbing $210 Geotextiles, Riprap $170 R-5 Rip Rap $1,950 Turbidity Curtain $10,350 Stabilize Slope Grading $4,010 Borrow, Type F $1,110 Topsoil (6" Depth) $4,180 Streambank Seed Mix, Seeding $9,280 Rehabilitate Piers Shallow Concrete Spall Repair $3,110 Pedestrian Walkway Shallow Concrete Spall Repair $4,140 Epoxy Injection Crack Repair $6,210 Fish Ladder Connection Epoxy Injection Crack Repair $1,250 Wing Walls Epoxy Injection Crack Repair $9,320 Petrographic Testing $2,490 Test Pit $2,760 Rust Spot Repair* $6,210 *Note: *It is assumed that the rust spot on the wing wall can be repaired by epoxy injection and that no repair to the rebar is necessary. If petrographic testing and/or the test pit indicates otherwise, the cost to repair the rebar and to fill in the hole could be much higher. Pricing assumes all of the work will be completed together. Individual selections of work may increase cost.

------TE A------ EllergyAuthority TEA and City of Dover Update on the Decommissioning of the McKee Run Power Plant City of Dover Council Committee of the Whole Utility Committee January 26, 2021

- -TEA- - Decommissioning Decision Background THE EnergyAuthority Summer 2016 • The Energy Authority (TEA) provided the City of Dover with an Integrated Resource Plan to provide the City with forward looking power supply projections and the City’s alternatives to meet those needs. • TEA evaluated cost benefit analysis of Firm Transportation (FT) service for Dover’s existing units. Analysis showed Dover’s existing generators did not operate enough to justify the ongoing fixed costs which would be required to acquire FT natural gas. May 2017 • Due to age and economics, Dover retired McKee Units 1 & 2 on May 31, 2017. • Generation Analysis was performed by an outside consultant in regard to PJM Auction participation. July 2017 • TEA provided the City of Dover a PJM Capacity Performance Penalty Risk Analysis for Vansant and McKee 3 May 2018 • McKee 3 was bid into PJM BRA Auction using breakeven cost from the generation analysis; unit was not selected by PJM, sending the City a definitive pricing signal. • City of Dover partnered with The Energy Authority (TEA) to manage the RFP process for Power August 2018 Supply (Energy and Capacity) January 2019 • RFP process for Energy and Capacity resulted in market intelligence that showed power supply purchase was substantially more economic for the City of Dover rate payers than the operation of McKee 3. February 2019 • City of Dover made the decision to move forward with decommissioning McKee 3. January 21, 2021 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY 2

- -TEA- - Background THE EnergyAuthority Oct 2019 • City of Dover began planning decommission activities and hired NAES to identify high level decommissioning tasks and major activities. Resulted in “Decommissioning Project Playbook.” June 2020 • Initial RFP for decommissioning activities was drafted, based on findings from NAES, and presented to DNREC for review. Aug 2020 • Dover elected to participate in DNREC’s Volunteer Cleanup Program (VCP). VCP Application filed and accepted. Sept 2020 • City of Dover partnered with The Energy Authority (TEA) to manage the RFP process under the VCP structure. January 21, 2021 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY 3

- -TEA- - DNREC, VCP Process THE EnergyAuthority Pre-VCP Agreement VCP Agreement Remediation Work ✓ 1. Application for VCP 1. Initial Investigation 1. Work items to complete, per • includes $5,000 deposit 2. Facility Evaluation DNREC approved Remedial 2. Dover selects Certified HSCA* Action plans After the Investigation/Evaluation, Consultant and submits to each step below will occur, if 2. Certification - Completion of DNREC deemed necessary. DNREC Remedy approval required at each step. 3. DNREC approves 1. Remedial Investigation 4. VCP Agreement executed 2. Feasibility Study between DNREC & Dover 3. Remedial Design • HSCA Consultant explicitly named in contract 4. Remedial Action • Includes Remedial Action Work Plan and Contaminated Materials Plan * HSCA: Hazardous Substance Clean-up Act http://www.dnrec.delaware.gov/dwhs/SIRB/Pages/SIRB_Definitions.aspx January 21, 2021 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY 4

- - -TEA- - EnergyAuthority Timeline May 31, 2021: Plant Shut-down Unknown? Decommission Activities • Disconnection of energy sources. • Removal of vehicles, relocation VCP: Investigation & Evaluation of equipment, and tools etc. • All tasks that don’t require HSCA VCP: Feasibility Study, Remedial Design & oversight. Action Plans • Includes Remedial Action Work Plan and Contaminated Materials Plan • Certain discoveries may require community or public hearings HSCA: Oversight of Work Activities I Sequence/timing of Work activities will • Includes Cleanup Activities • Other activities that may impact cleanup (e.g. Demolition or other Decommission not be known until Work Plans are activities that don’t involve any chemicals) finalized. Once known, HSCA consultant will HSCA or Contractor(s) • Various: Includes Dover City Personnel, NAES, et al manage Cleanup and Demolition Activities (possibly with other • • HSCA Consultant contractors. • Demolition activities Cleanup activities • Contractor(s), Unknown January 21, 2021 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY 5

- - -TEA- - RFP Timeline: HSCA Consultant EnergyAuthority RFP: Document Prep Start Date End Date RFP Review Draft: TEA/COD 01/25/2021 02/05/2021 RFP Review Draft: DNREC 02/01/2021 02/05/2021 RFP Final Version Ready 02/12/2021 RFP Process, HSCA Consultant RFP Notice Published 02/15/2021 -- RFP Q&A Meeting 2/22/2021 -- McKee Run Site Visit (optional) By appointment By appointment RFP Bids Due 3/18/2021 -- Notification sent to Short-List Respondents 5/26/2021 -- Notification of final Bid Recipient(s) 6/18/2021 -- Contract Negotiation and Finalization 6/18/2021 7/18/2021 Plant Activities Plant Shut Down 5/31/2021 Decommission Activities 6/1/2021 08/15/2021 January 21, 2021 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY 6