Page 1
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
Monday, April 21, 2014 – 7:00 P.M.
City Hall Council Chambers
15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, Delaware
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
1) This agenda includes the applications previously scheduled for the March 17, 2014
meeting of the Planning Meeting. Due to weather conditions the March meeting was
cancelled. Public Notice was completed for these applications giving notice of tonight’s
(April 21, 2014) hearing date.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING of February 18, 2014
ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF QUARTERLY WORKSHOP MEETING of February 19, 2014
COMMUNICATIONS & REPORTS
1) Reminder: The next Planning Commission regular meeting is scheduled for MONDAY,
May 19, 2014 at 7:00pm in the City Council Chambers.
2) Reminder: The next Planning Commission Quarterly Workshop is scheduled for TUESDAY,
May 20 2014 at 12:00 noon in the City Hall Conference Room
3) Update on City Council Actions
4) Update on Planning activities
5) Education & Training Opportunities
OPENING REMARKS CONCERNING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
OLD BUSINESS
1) Requests for Extensions of Planning Commission Approval: None
2) Revision to Development Applications:
a) C-10-05 New Dover High School: Revision to Sidewalk – Revision of sidewalk network
design for the New Dover High School. The property is zoned R-10 (One Family
Residence Zone) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The property is
located on the south side of Forrest Avenue and east of Dover High Drive. The owner of
record is the Capital School District. Address: 1650 Forrest Avenue. Tax Parcel: ED-05-
076.00-02-07.00-000. The Planning Commission conditionally approved Conditional Use
Page 2
City of Dover Planning Commission Agenda
Public Hearing: April 21, 2014
Page 2 of 4
Site Plan C-10-05 on December 20, 2010, Final Site Plan Approval was granted to S-11-
18, and approval granted to a Revised Parking Justification and Waiver Request for
Parking Justification on October 21, 2013.
NEW BUSINESS
NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
1) S-14-04 Kent County Community School Additions at 65 Carver Road and 901 Forest Street
– Public Hearing and Site Development Plan Review to permit the construction of building
additions totaling 18,280 S.F. between two buildings with the associated site improvements
on a 45.46 acre parcel. The building additions consist of 2,640 S.F. to the Kent County
Community School at William Henry Middle School and 15,634 S.F. to Booker T.
Washington Elementary School. The property is zoned I-O (Institutional and Office Zone)
and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone 1). The property is located on the north
side of Forest Avenue between Weston Drive and Carver Road. The owner of record is
Dover Special School District (Capital School District). Property Addresses: 65 Carver Road,
901 Forest Street. Tax Parcels: ED-05-076.07-01-55.00-000, ED-05-076.07-01-65.00-000,
ED-05-076.07-01-66.00-000, and ED-05-076.08-01-28.00-000. Council District 4.
2) S-14-05 Winner Volkswagen Showroom at 1387 North DuPont Highway – Public Hearing
and Site Development Plan Review to permit the construction of a new 20,178 S.F.
showroom and service building adjacent to an existing showroom building with associated
site improvements on a 5.505 acre parcel. The property is zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial
Zone) and a portion is subject to the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone). The
property is located on the east side of North DuPont Highway and northwest of the entrances
to Dover Mall. The owner of record is 1387 DuPont Highway, LLC c/o Michael Hynansky
and lessee is Winner Dover 1387, LLC c/o Michael Hynansky. Property Address: 1387
North DuPont Highway. Tax Parcel: ED-05-057.00-01-15.00-000. Council District 3.
Waivers Requested: Reduction of Arterial Street Buffer, Consideration of Tree Mitigation
Plan.
3) SB-14-01 Dover Mall at 1365 North DuPont Highway: Minor Subdivision Plan – Public
Hearing and Minor Subdivision Plan Review to create three (3) lots from an existing parcel
totaling 149.3225 acres +/- of land. The lots proposed are Lot 1 of 53.1704 acres, Lot 2 of
30.7046 acres, and remaining residue land of 65.4475 acres. The property is zoned SC-3
(Regional Shopping Center Zone) and a portion is subject to the SWPOZ (Source Water
Protection Overlay Zone). The property is located on the east side of North DuPont Highway.
The owner of record is Dover Mall, LLC. Property Address: 1365 North DuPont Highway.
Tax Parcel: ED-05-057.00-01-14.00. Council District 3. Waiver Requested: Subdivision
Waiver of Requirement for Lot Frontage on a Public Street.
4) C-14-01 Personal Service Nail Salon at 235 W Loockerman Street – Public Hearing and
Conditional Use Review to permit a nail salon in an existing 1,400 S.F. +/- first floor tenant
space with associated interior improvements. The property is zoned C-2 (Central Commercial
Zone) and subject to the H (Historic District Zone). A Conditional Use permit is required
when other personal service stores are located within 250 feet of the proposed business site.
The property is located on the north side of Loockerman Street and east of the intersection
Page 3
City of Dover Planning Commission Agenda
Public Hearing: April 21, 2014
Page 3 of 4
with South New Street. The owner of record is Shreege Properties, LLC. Property Addresses:
235 West Loockerman Street. Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.09-01-50.00-000. Council District 4.
5) C-14-02 YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club at 825 Kenton Road – Public Hearing and
Conditional Use Site Plan Review to permit the construction of a new 1,600 S.F. pavilion,
conversion of the property to public sewer service, and associated site improvements on an
18.3 acre parcel. The property is zoned R-10 (One-Family Residence Zone). The property is
located on the east side of Kenton Road and south of Walker Road. The owner of record is
YMCA of Delaware. Property Address: 825 Kenton Road. Tax Parcel: ED05-067.18-02-
01.00-000. Council District 1. Waiver Requested: Partial Elimination of Sidewalk
Requirement.
6) S-14-08 Woodland Tree Clearing Plan of 560 Bay Road – Public Hearing and Site
Development Plan Review to permit the clearing of approximately 7.45 acres +/- of trees
(woodland) on a 12.67 acre +/- parcel. No buildings or paving are proposed. This is
associated with the Woodland Tree Mitigation Plan at the Anne McClements Woodland
Tract (Fork Branch Nature Preserve) previously approved by the Planning Commission on
April 19, 2010 with Application S-10-03 South Dover Plaza. The Woodland Mitigation Plan
was implemented and completed by October 2013. The property is zoned C-4 (Highway
Commercial Zone). The property is located on the southwest side of Bay Road. The owner of
record is S H E Holdings, LLC. Property Address: 560 Bay Road. Tax Parcel: ED-05-
077.00-01-10.00-000. Council District 2.
7) MI-14-02 Text Amendment: Revisions to Conditional Uses in RG-1/RG-2 – Public Hearing
and Review for Recommendation to City Council on a Text Amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance, Article 3 Section 2 General Residence Zones (RG-1 and RG-2) relating to
conditional uses. The proposed ordinance re-designates subsection (d) as subsection (e), and
inserts a new subsection (d) that allows professional offices as a Conditional Use within the
General Residence Zone on State Street and Governors Avenue between Water Street and
Mary Street, and on Route 8 subject to a series of restrictions. Ordinance #2014-05.
(Applicant Request and City Council Sponsors: Bonar, Hutchison, Lynn)
8) MI-14-03 Text Amendment: Revisions to Uses in Shopping Center Development Zones – –
Public Hearing and Review for Recommendation to City Council on Text Amendments to
the Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 Section 17 Shopping Center Development (SC-1, SC-2, and
SC-3). The proposed ordinance adds light motor vehicle service as an accessory use in the
SC-2 zone subject to conditions. The proposed ordinance would permit apartments and
multi-family dwellings as part of a mixed-use development in the SC-3 zone. Ordinance
#2014-06. (Applicant Requests and City Council Sponsors: Bonar, Hare, Lynn)
9) S-14-03 Watertower Place at 50 North DuPont Highway – Public Hearing and REVISED
Site Development Plan Review (formerly named Tower Commons) to permit the demolition
of existing office and industrial buildings and the construction of a shopping center
consisting of a total of four restaurant and commercial retail buildings with the associated site
improvements in Phase 1. Building 1 – Restaurant of 6,400 SF, Building 2 –
Restaurant/Retail of 9,600 SF, Building 3 – Restaurant of 5,030 SF, and Building 4 – Retail
of 14,820 SF. The overall property consists of 9.3 acres and is zoned SC-1 (Neighborhood
Shopping Center Zone) and subject to the Source Water Protection Overlay Zone (SWPOZ).
The property is bounded by North DuPont Highway, Division Street, Kings Highway, and
Page 4
City of Dover Planning Commission Agenda
Public Hearing: April 21, 2014
Page 4 of 4
Maple Parkway. The owner of record is Playtex Manufacturing, Inc. and the equitable owner
is TC Holdings, LLC. Property Addresses: 50 N. DuPont Highway and 519 East Division
Street. Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.06-01-02.00-000. Council District 2. This application will
require a Board of Adjustment application for a parking variance. Waivers Requested:
Partial Elimination of Sidewalks on Kings Highway and Maple Parkway, Requirement to
Reduce Imperious Area (Floodplain Requirement), Reduction of the Arterial Street Buffer.
ADJOURN
THE AGENDA ITEMS MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO
CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE
SESSIONS.
Posted Agenda: posted April 11, 2014 at 4:00pm
Page 5
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING of February
18, 2014
o These Meeting Minutes were distributed to the Planning
Commission for the March 17, 2014 meeting. Adoption of
these Meeting Minutes will be considered at the April 21,
2014 meeting of the Planning Commission.
MINUTES OF QUARTERLY WORKSHOP
MEETING of February 19, 2014
o These Meeting Minutes were distributed to the Planning
Commission for the March 17, 2014 meeting. Adoption of
these Meeting Minutes will be considered at the April 21,
2014 meeting of the Planning Commission.
The March Meeting of the Planning Commission was cancelled due to
weather conditions.
If you have questions or need additional copies of the Meeting Minutes,
please contact Planning Staff at 736-7196.
Page 7
C-10-05 New Dover High School: Revision to Sidewalk
– Revision of sidewalk network design for the New Dover High School.
The property is zoned R-10 (One Family Residence Zone) and subject to
the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The property is located on the
south side of Forrest Avenue and east of Dover High Drive. The owner
of record is the Capital School District. Address: 1650 Forrest Avenue.
Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.00-02-07.00-000. The Planning Commission
conditionally approved Conditional Use Site Plan C-10-05 on December
20, 2010, Final Site Plan Approval was granted to S-11-18, and
approval granted to a Revised Parking Justification and Waiver Request
for Parking Justification on October 21, 2013.
Information on this application was distributed to the Planning
Commission for the March 17, 2014 meeting. Please utilize this
information as the application will be considered at the April 21,
2014 meeting of the Planning Commission. This information
consisted of the following item which has been provided again.
o A copy of Site Plan Sheet C-001C (Bid Pack C – Updated)
from Check Print drawing set of 1/28/2014 is provided as
reference for this update on the sidewalk network design.
As previously referenced, Staff is now providing a summary of the
information from the Safety Advisory & Transportation Committee
and an update on the project status. See Memorandum of March 14,
2014 in reference to “Request to Eliminate ‘S’ Sidewalk between
Dover High Front Entrance and Route 8 Sidewalk.”
If you have questions or need additional copies of the application
information, please contact Planning Staff at 736-7196.
Page 10
S-14-04 Kent County Community School Additions at
65 Carver Road and 901 Forest Street – Public Hearing and
Site Development Plan Review to permit the construction of building
additions totaling 18,280 S.F. between two buildings with the associated
site improvements on a 45.46 acre parcel. The building additions consist
of 2,640 S.F. to the Kent County Community School at William Henry
Middle School and 15,634 S.F. to Booker T. Washington Elementary
School. The property is zoned I-O (Institutional and Office Zone) and
subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone 1). The property is located
on the north side of Forest Avenue between Weston Drive and Carver
Road. The owner of record is Dover Special School District (Capital
School District). Property Addresses: 65 Carver Road, 901 Forest Street.
Tax Parcels: ED-05-076.07-01-55.00-000, ED-05-076.07-01-65.00-000,
ED-05-076.07-01-66.00-000, and ED-05-076.08-01-28.00-000. Council
District 4.
Information on this application was distributed to the Planning
Commission for the March 17, 2014 meeting. Please utilize this
information as the application will be considered at the April 21,
2014 meeting of the Planning Commission.
See also the attached Memorandum dated March 11, 2014 from
DNREC – Division of Watershed Stewardship regarding the
Sediment & Stormwater Management for the project. This is to be
made part of the Development Advisory Committee (DAC) Report
and Comments.
If you have questions or need additional copies of the application
information, please contact Planning Staff at 736-7196.
Page 12
S-14-05 Winner Volkswagen Showroom at 1387 North
DuPont Highway – Public Hearing and Site Development Plan
Review to permit the construction of a new 20,178 S.F. showroom and
service building adjacent to an existing showroom building with
associated site improvements on a 5.505 acre parcel. The property is
zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone) and a portion is subject to the
SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone). The property is
located on the east side of North DuPont Highway and northwest of the
entrances to Dover Mall. The owner of record is 1387 DuPont Highway,
LLC c/o Michael Hynansky and lessee is Winner Dover 1387, LLC c/o
Michael Hynansky. Property Address: 1387 North DuPont Highway.
Tax Parcel: ED-05-057.00-01-15.00-000. Council District 3. Waivers
Requested: Reduction of Arterial Street Buffer, Consideration of Tree
Mitigation Plan.
Information on this application was distributed to the Planning
Commission for the March 17, 2014 meeting. Please utilize this
information as the application will be considered at the April 21,
2014 meeting of the Planning Commission.
See also attached Letter of March 20, 2014 summarizing a meeting
between the applicant and DelDOT regarding the transportation
planning and off-site improvements for the project.
If you have questions or need additional copies of the application
information, please contact Planning Staff at 736-7196.
Page 16
SB-14-01 Dover Mall at 1365 North DuPont Highway:
Minor Subdivision Plan – Public Hearing and Minor
Subdivision Plan Review to create three (3) lots from an existing parcel
totaling 149.3225 acres +/- of land. The lots proposed are Lot 1 of
53.1704 acres, Lot 2 of 30.7046 acres, and remaining residue land of
65.4475 acres. The property is zoned SC-3 (Regional Shopping Center
Zone) and a portion is subject to the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection
Overlay Zone). The property is located on the east side of North DuPont
Highway. The owner of record is Dover Mall, LLC. Property Address:
1365 North DuPont Highway. Tax Parcel: ED-05-057.00-01-14.00.
Council District 3. Waiver Requested: Subdivision Waiver of
Requirement for Lot Frontage on a Public Street.
Information on this application was distributed to the Planning
Commission for the March 17, 2014 meeting. Please utilize this
information as the application will be considered at the April 21,
2014 meeting of the Planning Commission.
See the attached Memorandum dated March 14, 2014 as a follow-up
to the Emergency Services concerns for this project.
If you have questions or need additional copies of the application
information, please contact Planning Staff at 736-7196.
Page 18
City of Dover
DATA SHEET FOR CONDITIONAL USE PLAN REVIEW
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OF April 9, 2014
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF April 21, 2014
Plan Title: Personal Service Nail Salon
C-14-01
Plan Type: Conditional Use Plan
Property Location: North side of Loockerman Street east of South New Street
Property Address: 235 West Loockerman Street
Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.09-01-50.00-000
Owner: Shreege Properties, LLC
Lessee: Denise Anderson
Tenant Space Area: 1,400 SF ±
Present Use: Vacant first floor tenant space
Proposed Use: Nail Salon
Sewer & Water: City of Dover
Zoning Classification: C-2 (Central Commercial Zone)
H (Historic District Zone)
P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903
Community Excellence Through Quality Service
Page 19
CITY OF DOVER City of
Dover
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Planning
Office
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: April 9, 2014
APPLICATION: Personal Service Nail Salon at 235 West Loockerman Street
FILE #: C-14-01 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Planning
CONTACT PERSON: Tracey Harvey PHONE #: (302) 736-7196
PLAN SUMMARY:
This Conditional Use Plan Review is to permit a Nail Salon on the 1,400 S.F. first floor tenant
space of an existing building located at 235 West Loockerman Street. The property for the
proposed development is zoned C-2 (Central Commercial Zone) and is subject to the H (Historic
District Zone). The property is located on the north side of Loockerman Street and east of the
intersection of South New Street. The owner of record is Shreege Properties, LLC and the lessee
is Denise Anderson. The property address is 235 West Loockerman Street. Tax Parcel: ED-05-
077.09-01-50.00-000.
Project Site
This building was built in 1920’s as a mixed-use building. It is within the Historic District Zone
and listed in the National Register of Historic Places as a contributing resource to the Victorian
Dover Historic District (K-396.81). The following excerpt on the building is from the National
Register nomination.
K-396.81 233-239 West Loockerman Street – 1920s, 3-story, 4 x 8 bay, brick
commercial/residential structure; flat roof, decorative brick cornice, pilaster strips; 6/1 sash triple
nd rd st
windows on 2 and 3 floor levels; large display windows for 4 separate businesses on 1 floor
level.
The building is within the Historic District. Any exterior changes including signage are subject
to the Architectural Review Certification process and compliance with the Design Standards and
Guidelines for the City of Dover Historic District Zone.
The building consists of three floors. The first floor of the building is divided into multiple tenant
spaces. This tenant space was most recently utilized as the Ancient Way Massage and Day Spa
(Application C-06-07). The second and third floors of the building consist of two separate
apartments. The tenant space located on the west side of the subject tenant space is a shoe repair
establishment, and the adjacent building located to the east side of the proposed site is the
Tresses Hair Studio. The Tresses Hair Studio is a personal service store located within 250 feet
of the subject site.
Page 20
C-14-01 Personal Service Nail Salon at 235 W. Loockerman St.
Final DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 2
Proposed Project
The application seeks to allow for the establishment of a Nail Salon on the first floor of the
existing building. The plan indicates there will be a waiting area for clients in the front of the
building, a pedicure station, a nail dryer table, a nail bar station, and an eyebrow waxing station.
Due to its location, this type of land use as a Nail Salon (a personal service store) on the first
floor requires Conditional Use approval by the Planning Commission as noted in Article 3
§13.21 of the Zoning Ordinance.
13.2 Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the
planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general conditions set
forth in article 10, section 10.1 [1] of this ordinance and to any specified requirements set forth
below. Any of the following uses in existence at the time this ordinance [section] is adopted are
considered permitted uses, and shall not lose their status as permitted uses in their existing
locations unless the use is changed to one of the uses listed above in [sub] section 13.1 of this
ordinance [section]. Changes from one conditional use to another will require conditional use
approval.
13.21 Personal service stores, including, but not limited to, barbershops, beauty shops, tailors,
day spas, and other establishments in which the primary business is the sale of a service, rather
than a product, located on the first floor on Loockerman Street between State Street and New
Street and located within 250 feet of another personal service store.
This Conditional Use is subject to the requirements of Article 10 §1 further discussed below.
With Conditional Use applications, the Planning Commission reviews the proposed project to
determine whether or not the intended use is appropriate in type and scale for the immediate
neighborhood. The Commission must also consider whether or not the proposed use will have
an adverse impact on the future orderly development of the surrounding area. Several sections of
the Zoning Ordinance which relate to the role of the Commission in reviewing Conditional Use
applications are particularly relevant when reviewing this application:
1.1 Accessibility for emergency response. That all proposed structures, equipment or material
shall be readily accessible for fire, ambulance, police, and other emergency response;
1.2 Harmony of location, size and character. That the proposed use shall be of such location,
size and character that, in general, it will be in harmony with the appropriate and orderly
development of the zone in which it is proposed to be situated and will not be detrimental to the
orderly development of adjacent properties in accordance with the zoning classification of such
properties;
For a use seeking conditional use approval that proposes to occupy an existing structure in the
C-2 Zoning District, Article 3 §13.3 outlines the submission requirements. These requirements
include a map of the property showing existing conditions and a conceptual floor plan with the
appropriate legal data.
13.3 Submission requirements for conditional uses in the C-2 zone. The following submission
requirements shall be used in lieu of the requirements of article 10, section 1.6, in the event that
the business, office, or establishment seeking conditional use approval will be occupying an
existing structure:
(a) The applicant shall cause a site map to be prepared. The applicant shall submit 21
copies of the site map at the time of application. The site map shall conform to the
Page 21
C-14-01 Personal Service Nail Salon at 235 W. Loockerman St.
Final DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 3
following specifications and the following elements shall be included on the site map:
1. The map shall be at least 11 [inches] by 17 inches, but not more than 24
[inches] by 36 inches, and at a scale of ten, 20, 30 or 40 feet to the inch, except
that, if the property has a maximum dimension over 900 feet, a scale of 50 feet to
the inch may be used.
2. The existing building and conditions on the lot must be depicted. It is
permissible to utilize the most recent mortgage survey of the property for this
purpose. If conditions, such as landscaping and accessory structures, on the lot
have changed since the survey was completed, the applicant shall depict these
changes on the plan to the best of his/her ability. However, the nature and extent
of such revisions must be approved by the city planner at the required pre-
application meeting.
3. A conceptual floor plan of the building is required. This floor plan must depict
the location and percent of total floor area devoted to the proposed uses. Any
uses on separate floors which are not the subject of the application must be
referenced by a note on the plan. The city planner may request more detailed
information, including architectural floor plans, on a case-by-case basis at his/her
discretion.
4. Legal data:
(a) Lot, blocks, and section number.
(b) Name and address of the owner of record.
(c) Name and address of the equitable owner, if any.
(d) Name and address of the person, firm, or organization preparing the
map.
(e) Date, north point, and written and graphical scale.
(f) The location and names of adjacent streets.
(g) The location, zoning, and owners of record of all adjacent properties.
Staff notes that the case of this proposal of the existing building occupies the entire property
parcel.
SITE CONSIDERATIONS:
Trash Collection
There is not a specific Dumpster pad requirement for personal service uses. Arrangements for
trash collection will need to be made with either the City of Dover or a private trash collection
service. Dumpster enclosures are required and must be implemented where space is available on
a site. Currently, trash collection along Loockerman Street is curbside pick-up on a designated
night by the City of Dover.
Parking
The C-2 zoning district does not have an off-street parking requirement for existing buildings.
Staff notes that there are several municipal parking lots located within the immediate area and on
street parking.
Bicycle Parking
Bicycle parking is not required as there is no off-street parking requirement. There are bicycle
parking facilities along West Loockerman Street (post style).
Page 22
C-14-01 Personal Service Nail Salon at 235 W. Loockerman St.
Final DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 4
Sidewalk
There is existing sidewalk along West Loockerman Street.
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN
CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S
AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE.
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1) The Site Data and plan drawing column will need to be updated prior to Final Approval with
the following items. Staff recommends utilizing an 11x17 plan sheet size to present the
project floor plan (on half the sheet) and then to listing the data information.
a) Any changes recommended or approvals by the Planning Commission.
b) Indicate the proposed use.
c) Add legal data items :
1. Name and address of the owner of record.
2. Name of lessee as preparer of plan and date.
3. Tax Parcel identification number
4. List zoning districts: C-2 and H
2) Provide an Owner’s Certification note and signature line to plan sheet. See text below.
OWNER’S CERTIFICATION:
I, _______________________, hereby certify that I am the owner of the property described and
shown on this plan, that the plan was made at my direction, and that I acknowledge the same to be
my act and desire the plan to be developed as shown in accordance with all applicable laws and
regulations.
DATE ___________________ SIGNATURE_____________________________
3) Lessee’s signature and certification notes will need to be added to the plan sheet.
LESSES’S CERTIFICATION:
I, _______________________, hereby certify that I am the lessee of the tenant space described and
shown on this plan, that the plan was made at my direction, and that I acknowledge the same to be
my act and desire the plan to be developed as shown in accordance with all applicable laws and
regulations.
DATE ___________________ SIGNATURE_____________________________
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
None
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
Page 23
C-14-01 Personal Service Nail Salon at 235 W. Loockerman St.
Final DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 5
1) Following Planning Commission approval of the Conditional Use Plan, the Plan must be
revised to meet all conditions of approval from the Development Advisory Committee or
as otherwise noted. A Check Print must be submitted for review by Planning Office Staff.
Upon determination that the Plan is complete and all agency approvals have been
received, copies of the Plan may be submitted for final endorsement.
2) The use as a personal service store must comply with applicable Building Codes and Fire
Codes. The applicant is advised to meet with the City’s Fire Marshall and Building
Inspector to learn more about these requirements.
3) The applicant shall be aware that the Conditional Use Plan approval does not represent a
Sign Permit, nor does it convey permission to place any sign on the premises. Any
proposed site or building identification sign shall require a Sign Permit from the City of
Dover prior to placement of any such sign.
4) The applicant shall be aware that the Conditional Use Plan approval does not represent a
Building Permit and associated construction activity permits. A separate application
process is required for issuance of a Building Permit and Certificate of Occupancy from
the City of Dover.
5) Exterior renovations to the building are subject to Architectural Review Certification as
the property is located within the Historic District. This may include review by the
Historic District Commission.
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible.
Page 24
C ITY OF DOVER
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
A PPLICATION R EVIEW C OMMENTARY
S TAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: A PRIL 2, 2014
A PPLICATION: PERSONAL S ERVICE N AIL SALON, 235 W.
LOOCKERMAN S TREET
FILE #: C-14-01
R EVIEWING AGENCY : City of Dover Electric and Public Works Departments
CONTACT PERSON: Aren Wright - Electric
Jason A. Lyon, P.E. – Public Works
CONTACT PHONE #: ELECTRIC - 302-736-7070 / PUBLIC WORKS – 302-736-7025
T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN
A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE .
T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT :
C ITY AND STATE CODE R EQUIREMENTS
ELECTRIC
1. Owner is responsible for following the requirements outlined in the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. The
handbook is now available on the website at the following link: http://www.cityofdover.com/Public-Documents-4017/.
2. The roadway and curbing must be in.
3. The right-of-way must be within 6" of final grade.
4. The property corners must be staked.
5. Owner is responsible for locating all water, sewer, and storm sewer lines.
6. Owner is responsible for installing all conduits and equipment pads per the City of Dover Engineering Department
specifications.
7. Owner is responsible for site and/or street lighting.
8. Meter locations will be determined by City of Dover Engineering Department.
9. Load sheets and AutoCAD compatible DXF or DWG diskettes of site plans, including driveways, are required prior to
receiving approved electrical construction drawings.
10. Any relocation of existing electrical equipment will be engineered by the City of Dover Electric Department. Developer
may be required to perform a quantity of the relocation. Any work performed by the City of Dover will be at the
owner’s expense.
11. Prior to construction, owner is responsible for granting an easement to the City of Dover Electric
Department. Easement forms will be furnished and prepared by the City of Dover Electric Engineering Department.
12. Fees will be assessed upon final site plans. The owner will be responsible for fees assessed prior to
construction. Owner is required to sign off plans prepared by the Electric Department.
13. Must maintain 10' clearance around all electrical equipment, unless pre-approved by the City of Dover Electric
Engineering Department.
14. Prior to the completion of any/all designs and estimates, the owner is responsible for providing the Electric
Engineering Department with a physical address of the property.
Page 25
Personal Service Nail Salon
File #: C-14-01
April 2, 2014
Page 2 of 3
15. All Engineering and design for Dover Electric will be engineered upon final approved plans. All Engineering work will
be furnished by the City’s Electric Engineering Department.
WATER
1. All water utility components must meet the requirements of the Water Wastewater Handbook, effective date March 22,
2010. Please contact our office for more information.
2. The following notes must be added to the plans:
a. Any existing water lines not to be utilized by the proposed facility must be properly abandoned at the mains in
accordance with the City of Dover Department of Public Works specifications and requirements.
3. Water usage projections (peak demand or plumbing fixtures) must be submitted to our office to correctly determine
the size of the domestic and irrigation (if applicable) water meter for the proposed building. These projections must be
submitted prior to approval so the meter size can be placed on the final plan. The proposed water meter must be
installed in a pit per City of Dover requirements and manufacturer’s recommendations. Also, a dual check valve is
required downstream of the meter.
WASTEWATER
1. All wastewater utility components must meet the requirements of the Water Wastewater Handbook, effective date
March 22, 2010. Please contact our office for more information.
2. The following notes must be added to the plans:
a. Any existing sanitary sewer lines not to be utilized by the proposed facility must be properly abandoned at the
mains in accordance with the City of Dover Department of Public Works specifications and requirements.
b. Part II, Chapter 180, Article III, Section 180-10 of the Code of Kent County requires that “no person shall
discharge or cause to be discharged any stormwater, surface water, uncontaminated groundwater, roof runoff,
subsurface drainage, uncontaminated noncontact cooling water or unpolluted industrial process waters to any
sanitary sewer”, this shall include condensate. Sec. 110-231 of the City of Dover Code defines storm sewer as
“…any system used for conveying rain water, surface water, condensate, cooling water or similar liquid wastes,
exclusive of sewage.” The contractor, developer, owner and designers shall ensure during construction that no
illegal discharges to the sanitary sewer system are created with the site improvements.
3. The size, length, slope, type and flow directions must be shown on all existing and proposed sanitary sewer lines.
Rim and invert elevations must be labeled on all sanitary structures, including cleanouts.
4. Cleanouts must be installed on sanitary sewer laterals within five feet (5’) of the building, one foot (1’) outside of the
right-of-way and at all bends. Any cleanout located within a traffic bearing location shall be installed with a heavy duty
cast iron frame and cover to prevent damage to the cleanout and lateral.
5. Sizing (flow) calculations must be submitted for all sanitary sewer laterals (other than for single-family dwellings)
showing that velocity and all other requirements are met.
6. The minimum size of all sanitary sewer laterals shall be six-inch (6”).
S TORMWATER / S TREETS / SANITATION / GROUNDS / GENERAL
1. None.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES
ELECTRIC
1. Owner must give the City of Dover Electric Department three (3) month notice prior to construction. Owner is
responsible for following the requirements outlined in the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. The handbook is
now available on the website at the following link: http://www.cityofdover.com/departments/electric/documents/.
WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER / STREETS /SANITATION / GROUNDS / GENERAL
1. None.
A DVISORY COMMENTS TO THE A PPLICANT
Page 26
Personal Service Nail Salon
File #: C-14-01
April 2, 2014
Page 3 of 3
ELECTRIC
1. None
WATER
1. Depending on the additional number of fixtures proposed with this project, additional impact fees may be assessed to
this property.
WASTEWATER
1. Depending on the additional number of fixtures proposed with this project, additional impact fees may be assessed to
this property.
SANITATION
1. Sanitation service shall remain as is until further notice from the City of Dover.
S TORMWATER / S TREETS / GROUNDS
1. None
GENERAL
1. Construction plans will not be reviewed by our office unless all previous comments have been clearly addressed
within the plan set and accordingly identified within an itemized response letter and with the Water/Wastewater Initial
Plan Submission Checklist, which can be obtained from the following website: https://imageserv9.team-
logic.com/mediaLibrary/198/WaterWastewaterHandbookFinal_1.pdf, page 88.
I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE
C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .
Page 27
C F
I I
CITY OF DOVER T R
Y E
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
O M
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY F A
R
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: 04/09/14 D S
O H
V A
E L
R
APPLICATION: 235 W Loockerman St Personal Service Nail Salon
FILE #: C-14-01 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal
CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Deputy Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY,
AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF
EXPERTISE.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY
THE APPLICANT:
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
Proposed building is business.
Any gas fired HVAC equipment must be equipped with emergency cut off switches remotely
located.
Address numbers of at least 12 inches in height must be placed on the street side of the building
visible from the street. Label all suites
Any natural or LP gas bottles, meters, values, regulators, etc., must have impact protection.
Full building and fire plan review is required.
Building cannot be occupied or construction or renovations started until completion of building
and fire plan review.
Knox Box required.
Project to be completed per approved Site Plan.
Page 28
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
An on-site meeting is required. NFPA 101 Life Safety Code 24.1.3.3 needs to be ensured.
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
After any application has been approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant has a
maximum of thirty (30) days to appeal to the Code Board of Appeals Committee.
All comments from this office, approved by the Planning Commission are at the expense of the
owner/applicant.
The proposed building will be reviewed under business Occupancy.
The City of Dover uses the 2012 NFPA Life Safety Code, 2009 IBC, latest editions of all other
NFPA Codes and the 2012 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations.
The Dover Fire Department request that a 8 ½ X 11 copy of the floor plan and site plan be
submitted to Station 1, attention Fire Chief, prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued.
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible.
Page 29
CITY OF DOVER D
E
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
L
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D
O
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: April 2, 2014 T
===============================================================
APPLICATION: Personal Service Nail Salon at 235 West Loockerman Street
FILE#: C-14-01 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT
CONTACT PERSON: Julio F. Seneus PHONE#: 760-2145
===============================================================
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT:
CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1. The department has no comments.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the planning department as soon as possible.
Page 30
CITY OF DOVER
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
April 2014
APPLICATION: Personal Service Nail Salon
FILE #: C-14-01
REVIEWING AGENCY: Kent Conservation District
CONTACT PERSON: David C. Cahill PHONE #: 741-2600 ext.3
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND
COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE
FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE
APPLICANT:
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1. Kent Conservation District has no objection to conditional use site plan of the above referenced site.
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
1. If at any time expansion or earth disturbing activity (clearing, grubbing tree clearing etc.) takes place and
exceeds 5000 square feet; a detailed Sediment and Stormwater Management Plan must be submitted and
approved to the Kent Conversation District.
Page 31
City of Dover
DATA SHEET FOR CONDITIONAL USE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OF April 9, 2014
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF April 21, 2014
Plan Title: YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club at 825 Kenton Road
C-14-02
Plan Type: Conditional Use Site Plan
Applicants: Owner of Record: YMCA of Delaware
Location: Northeast side of Kenton Road, south of Walker Road, entrance across from Fox Hall
Road.
Address: 825 Kenton Road
Tax Parcel: ED05-067.18-02-01.00-000
Site Area: 18.3 acres +/-
Zoning: R-10 (One-Family Residence)
Proposed Use: Swimming Pool, Annual Membership Club
Building Areas: Existing Building(s) – 2,765 S.F. (Total) (Pool House)
Proposed Building(s) – 1,600 S.F. Pavilion
120 S.F. Hygiene Hut
Impervious Areas: Existing – 9%
Proposed – 8%
Floor Area Ratio: 0.005
Off Street Parking: Required – N/A
Existing – 125 parking spaces (2 ADA)
Proposed – 124 parking spaces (5 ADA)
Sanitary Facilities: Existing – Private, Proposed – City of Dover
Water Supply: City of Dover
Waivers Requested: Partial Elimination of Sidewalk Requirement
P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903
Community Excellence Through Quality Service
Page 32
City of
Dover
CITY OF DOVER Planning
Office
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: April 9, 2014
APPLICATION: YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club at 825 Kenton Road
FILE #: C-14-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Planning Office
CONTACT PERSON: Bill Cook, Planner PHONE #: 302.736.7196
PLAN SUMMARY
This is a Conditional Use Site Plan to permit the construction of a 1,600 S.F. pavilion and other
associated site improvements on an 18.3 acre parcel. The property is zoned R-10 (One-Family
Residence) and is located on the northeast side of Kenton Road, south of Walker Road, with an
entrance across from Fox Hall Road. The owner of record is YMCA of Delaware. Property
Address: 825 Kenton Road. Tax Parcel: ED05-067.18-02-01.00-000.
Site History
Staff has found no record of past approvals by the City of Dover Planning Commission for the
former Kent Swim Club. Records show a series of Building Permits between 1992 and 2012 for
minor site improvements, as well as improvements and repairs to structures and site features.
The Kent Swim Club is believed to have been established sometime in the 1950’s. This property
was part of a large area along Kenton Road that was annexed into the City of Dover on August
12, 1969. At an unknown point in time (between 1969-1994), the zoning was set as RC
(Recreational and Commercial Zone). Then as part of the 1996 Comprehensive Rezoning (a
follow-up to the adoption of The Dover Plan: 1996 Comprehensive Plan) the property was
rezoned to R-10 (One-Family Residence Zone).
The continued use of the facility is determined to be a “legal non-conforming use” that is eligible
for Conditional Use consideration.
CONDITIONAL USE
Within the R-10 zoning district, the use of a property for an “annual membership club” is
permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use by the Planning Commission. Zoning
Ordinance, Article 3 Section 1.14c sets specific limitations for outdoor entertainment, exterior
lighting, public address systems, and setbacks.
With Conditional Use Applications, the Planning Commission reviews the proposed project to
determine whether or not the intended use is appropriate in type and scale for the immediate
neighborhood. The Commission must also consider whether or not the proposed use will have
an adverse impact on the future orderly development of the surrounding area. The following are
Page 33
C-14-02 YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club at 825 Kenton Road
DAC Report of April 9, 2014
Page 3 of 7
sections of the Zoning Ordinance which relate to the role of the Commission in reviewing
Conditional Use applications:
Article 10. Planning Commission
Section 1. Approval of conditional uses.
On application and after public notice and hearing, the commission may authorize the
issuance by the city planner of permits for any of the conditional uses for which this ordinance
requires, in the district in which such use is proposed to be located. In approving any such use,
the planning commission shall take into consideration the public health, safety and welfare, the
comfort and convenience of the public in general and of the residents of the immediate
neighborhood in particular, and may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards as may be
required in order that the results of its action may, to the maximum extent possible, further the
expressed intent of this ordinance and the accomplishment of the following objectives in
particular:
1.1 Accessibility for emergency response. That all proposed structures, equipment or
material shall be readily accessible for fire, ambulance, police, and other emergency
response;
1.2 Harmony of location, size and character. That the proposed use shall be of such
location, size and character that, in general, it will be in harmony with the appropriate and
orderly development of the zone in which it is proposed to be situated and will not be
detrimental to the orderly development of adjacent properties in accordance with the
zoning classification of such properties;
1.3 Residential zones. That, in addition to the above, in the case of any use located in,
or adjacent to, a residential zone:
1.31 The location and size of such use, the nature and intensity of operations
involved in or conducted in connection therewith, its site layout and its relation to
access streets shall be such that both pedestrian and vehicular traffic to and from
the use and the assembly of persons in connection therewith will not be
hazardous or inconvenient to, or incongruous with, the said residential district or
conflict with the normal traffic of the neighborhood; and
1.32 The location and height of buildings, the location, nature and height of
walls and fences, the nature and extent of landscaping, and other improvements
on the site shall be such that the use will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings.
The Planning Commission may set conditions of approval for the Conditional Use during the
review process. They also have the ability to require periodic renewal of a Conditional Use
Permit and also can consider revocation of a Conditional Use Permit.
PROJECT SUMMARY
This project will add a pavilion structure on a site northeast of the existing parking lot. A mobile
restroom structure will be sited northeast of the existing pool house and connected to water and
sewer service. Existing tennis and volleyball courts visible from Kenton Road will be
demolished and replaced by a playground. A sidewalk will be constructed on the left side of the
entrance drive off Kenton Road, and additional ADA parking spaces will be marked and
allocated from the existing parking lot. The applicant also proposes removing an existing septic
tank and connecting to public sewer service via a connection to be established within the
adjacent condominium development.
BUILDING ARCHITECTURE
The plans for the pavilion show a simple open structure of wood columns and pre-engineered
Page 34
C-14-02 YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club at 825 Kenton Road
DAC Report of April 9, 2014
Page 4 of 7
wood trusses with a composite shingle roof. The structure design has been used at other YMCA
facilities. The “hygiene hut” is a mobile structure with separate men’s and women’s restroom
facilities, hot and cold water, lighting, and HVAC.
Both the pavilion and hygiene hut comply with zoning requirements of a minimum 50 foot
setback from the property lines for all structures for this type of Conditional Use in a residential
zoning district.
SITE CONSIDERATIONS
Portions of the property contain identified wetland areas, and the majority of the site remains
wooded. Sidewalks are located along the Kenton Road frontage north of the site entrance and
along the Walker Road frontage. Various utility infrastructure components are also found along
the road frontages. A stormwater pond is found adjacent to the property at the intersection of
Walker Road and Kenton Road.
Entrances
The site is accessed by two driveways. The driveway from Kenton Road at Fox Hall Road is
approximately 12 feet wide. There are right and left turn lanes from Kenton Road. The second
driveway is approximately 17 feet wide and is located off Walker Road near Harmony Lane.
Walker Road at this location has paved shoulders on both sides without marked turn lanes. The
applicant has indicated the intention to establish a one-way traffic pattern whereby traffic enters
from Kenton Road and exits to Walker Road.
Sidewalks
The site plan proposes a new sidewalk to be installed on the northwest side of the Kenton Road
entrance driveway, connecting to the existing sidewalk along the Kenton Road frontage. A
sidewalk does not exist on the Kenton Road frontage southeast of the entrance.
Waiver Request for Partial Elimination of Sidewalk Requirement
The applicant is requesting a waiver to eliminate the requirement to install a sidewalk along the
Kenton Road frontage southeast of the entrance drive. In their written waiver request, the
applicant notes that perimeter fencing and a variety of utility structures are found along the
roadside. Future DelDOT improvement plans may necessitate reconfiguration of the right-of-
way and relocation of utilities, at which time sidewalk construction could take place.
Lighting
The existing Site Plan indicates three (3) light fixtures on poles in the parking area, and two (2)
near the entrance to the pool house. No additional lighting is proposed.
Trash
There is no requirement for dumpsters in residentially zoned districts. Trash collection must be
provided by a private contractor per comments from the Department of Public Works. Due to the
non-residential use of the property a dumpster enclosure is recommended if the applicant
requires a dumpster to serve the needs of the property.
Signage
No signage is shown in the proposed plan. Any signage must be approved through a separate
sign approval and permitting process.
Page 35
C-14-02 YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club at 825 Kenton Road
DAC Report of April 9, 2014
Page 5 of 7
PARKING SUMMARY
The parking requirement for such a conditional use in an R-10 zoning district is not established,
and the Zoning Ordinance does not have a parking calculation specific to pools. The number of
employees was not identified, and parking demand likely varies due to the seasonal use patterns
of an outdoor recreation facility. The proposed parking is reduced by one space from the current
condition (125 spaces) to a total of 124 spaces. The number of ADA parking spaces is increased
from 2 to 5 by revised marking and the reallocation of one standard parking space.
The applicant is reminded that parking on grass surfaces is prohibited.
Bicycle Parking
The site is required to provide bicycle parking. The bicycle parking calculation is one for every
twenty parking spaces. Based on the number of parking spaces at 124, then seven (7) bicycle
parking spaces are required. The plan indicates seven (7) bicycle parking spaces will be provided
by racks on-site located adjacent to the sidewalk entering the facility from Kenton Road.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
The total woodland area prior to proposed site improvements is 714,384 SF (16.4 acres).
Following the proposed tree removal, the woodland area to be preserved is 704,236 SF (16.19
acres). The woodland clearance proposed is approximately 1.42% (10,148 SF) of the total pre-
project woodland area and does not approach the 50% tree clearing threshold requiring a tree
mitigation plan.
The planting of thirty-one (31) trees is required based on the total amount of non-woodland area
(92,912 SF) on the site following clearance for the pavilion site and tree clearing for the
proposed sewer utility line.
The applicant proposes tree planting along the entrance driveway from Kenton Road, inside the
property line adjacent to the Kenton Road frontage northwest of the entrance, and between the
parking lot and the new playground area. Additional trees are proposed on the property adjacent
to the stormwater pond at the corner of Kenton Road and Walker Road. The proposed trees
consist of a mix of deciduous trees, ornamental trees and shrubs, and evergreen trees and shrubs.
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN
CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S
AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE.
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1) The Site Plan must be updated with changes recommended or approvals including any
waivers granted by the Planning Commission. Add to plan as reference notes.
2) Plan Sheet Revisions:
a) Label dimensions of all existing and proposed structures.
b) Label dimensions of proposed play area.
c) Provide label legend(s).
d) Provide legend/description of identified soil types.
Page 36
C-14-02 YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club at 825 Kenton Road
DAC Report of April 9, 2014
Page 6 of 7
e) The Site Data Column will need to be updated prior to Final Approval with the
following:
i) Provide Floor Area Ratio for project site.
ii) Any changes recommended or approvals including information on any waivers
granted by the Planning Commission.
3) Proposed Hygiene Hut
a) Provide details on necessary service connections.
b) Indicate paths and accessibility to the hut.
4) The proposed sidewalk entering the property should terminate in an ADA approved ramp.
Provide detail on the Site plan.
5) Add construction details for proposed site elements such as bicycle racks and sidewalks.
6) Provide a narrative description of proposed trash collection.
7) A dumpster enclosure is required. Provide description/details of construction materials and
note proposed location on the Site Plan.
8) Documentation of agreements with the adjacent English Village Condominium Association
with regards to the sewer connection easement must be provided and indicated on the Site
Plan.
9) Add note to the Site Plan to indicate direction, power, and time of use for any outdoor
lighting.
10) If a Record Plan is required by another agency, then submission is also required to the
Planning Office for review and approval.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
1) Waiver Request- Elimination of Sidewalk Requirement: Staff recommends that the Waiver
Request be granted recognizing the potential impact of future DelDOT capital improvements
on Kenton Road. Staff accepts the proposed option of payment in lieu of sidewalk
construction as outlined in the DelDOT comments. The applicant would pay into the Kent
County Sidewalk and Multi-Use Path Fund in lieu of constructing the sidewalk.
2) Provide details of contracted trash collection service, and indicate locations of proposed trash
receptacles. Staff recommends construction of a dumpster enclosure to screen trash
receptacles.
3) Provide clarification of the vehicle traffic patterns on the site as the main entrance drive
appears to accommodate one-way traffic due to the drive width of 12 feet. Appropriate traffic
control measures should be added to clearly indicate a one-way circulation pattern.
4) Proposed Pavilion:
a) Provide a path to the pavilion structure. Indicate dimensions, location, and surface.
Page 37
C-14-02 YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club at 825 Kenton Road
DAC Report of April 9, 2014
Page 7 of 7
b) Indicate floor details of the pavilion (dirt, concrete, etc.).
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
1) Other agencies and departments which participate in the Development Advisory
Committee may provide additional comments related to their areas of expertise and code
requirements.
2) Following Planning Commission approval of the Conditional Use Site Plan, the Plan
must be revised to meet all conditions of approval from the Development Advisory
Committee or as otherwise noted. A Check Print must be submitted for review by
Planning Office Staff and directly to other agencies. Upon determination that the Plan is
complete and all agency approvals have been received, copies of the Plan may be
submitted for final endorsement.
3) In the event, that major changes and revisions to the Conditional Use Site Development
Plan occur in the finalization of the Plan contact the Planning Office. Examples include
reorientation of the buildings, relocation of site components like stormwater management
areas, and increases in floor area count. These changes may require resubmittal for
review by the Development Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, or other
agencies and commissions making recommendations in regards to the plan.
4) For building construction, the requirements of the building code or fire code must be
complied with. Consult with the Chief Building Inspector and City of Dover Fire Marshal
for these requirements. The resolution of these items may impact the site design including
such items as building dimensions and height, building openings, and fire protection
needs, etc.
5) The applicant/developer shall be aware that prior to any ground disturbing activities on
the site the appropriate site inspections, Pre-Construction meetings (including a City of
Dover Pre-Construction meeting), and permits are required.
6) Construction may have an effect on the adjacent property owners and nearby travel lanes.
Any work requiring the closing or rerouting of potential customers or visitors to adjacent
properties should be coordinated as to offer the least amount of inconvenience to the
adjacent property owners.
7) The applicant shall be aware that Conditional Use Site Plan approval does not represent a
Sign Permit, nor does it convey permission to place any sign on the premises. Any
proposed site or building identification sign shall require a Sign Permit from the City of
Dover prior to placement of any such sign. It is recommended that the applicant discuss the
sign regulation requirements with the Planning Staff prior to applying for a Sign Permit.
8) The applicant shall be aware that Conditional Use Site Plan approval does not represent a
Building Permit and associated construction activity permits. A separate application
process is required for issuance of a Building Permit from the City of Dover.
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible.
Page 38
C ITY OF DOVER
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
A PPLICATION R EVIEW C OMMENTARY
S TAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: A PRIL 2, 2014
A PPLICATION : YMCA OF DELAWARE K ENT SWIM C LUB
FILE #: C-14-02
R EVIEWING AGENCY : City of Dover Electric and Public Works Departments
CONTACT PERSON: Aren Wright - Electric
Jason A. Lyon, P.E. – Public Works
CONTACT PHONE #: E LECTRIC - 302-736-7070 / PUBLIC WORKS – 302-736-7025
T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN
A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE .
T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT :
C ITY AND STATE CODE R EQUIREMENTS
ELECTRIC
1. Owner is responsible for following the requirements outlined in the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. The
handbook is now available on the website at the following link: http://www.cityofdover.com/Public-Documents-4017/.
2. The roadway and curbing must be in.
3. The right-of-way must be within 6" of final grade.
4. The property corners must be staked.
5. Owner is responsible for locating all water, sewer, and storm sewer lines.
6. Owner is responsible for installing all conduits and equipment pads per the City of Dover Engineering Department
specifications.
7. Owner is responsible for site and/or street lighting.
8. Meter locations will be determined by City of Dover Engineering Department.
9. Load sheets and AutoCAD compatible DXF or DWG diskettes of site plans, including driveways, are required prior to
receiving approved electrical construction drawings.
10. Any relocation of existing electrical equipment will be engineered by the City of Dover Electric Department. Developer
may be required to perform a quantity of the relocation. Any work performed by the City of Dover will be at the
owner’s expense.
11. Prior to construction, owner is responsible for granting an easement to the City of Dover Electric
Department. Easement forms will be furnished and prepared by the City of Dover Electric Engineering Department.
12. Fees will be assessed upon final site plans. The owner will be responsible for fees assessed prior to
construction. Owner is required to sign off plans prepared by the Electric Department.
13. Must maintain 10' clearance around all electrical equipment, unless pre-approved by the City of Dover Electric
Engineering Department.
14. Prior to the completion of any/all designs and estimates, the owner is responsible for providing the Electric
Engineering Department with a physical address of the property.
15. All Engineering and design for Dover Electric will be engineered upon final approved plans. All Engineering work will
be furnished by the City’s Electric Engineering Department.
Page 39
YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club
File #: C-14-02
April 2, 2014
Page 2 of 4
WATER
1. All water utility components must meet the requirements of the Water Wastewater Handbook, effective date March 22,
2010. Please contact our office for more information.
2. The following notes must be added to the plans:
a. Hydrant connections by the contractor are prohibited. This method may not be utilized during any phase of the
project.
b. Any existing water lines not to be utilized by the proposed facility must be properly abandoned at the mains in
accordance with the City of Dover Department of Public Works specifications and requirements.
c. The site contractor shall contact the City of Dover Public Works Construction Manager at (302) 736-7025 prior to
the start of construction. A representative from the City of Dover Department of Public Works must observe and
approve all City owned water and sanitary sewer interconnections and testing. All water taps must be performed
by a City of Dover approved contractor. The proposed location for the water connection may need to be adjusted
in the field due to conditions of the existing main. Possible conditions that would require tapping relocation
include proximity to pipe joints, other taps, concrete encasements, conflict with other utilities, and the like. Test
holes must be performed by the contractor to determine the best tapping location. The City of Dover will not be
held responsible for field conditions requiring adjustment of the tapping location or for any work required by the
contractor to make an appropriate and lawful connection.
3. The size, type, and location of all proposed and existing water lines and valves must be shown on the plan.
4. Water usage projections (peak demand or plumbing fixtures) must be submitted to our office to correctly determine
the size of the domestic and irrigation (if applicable) water meter for the proposed building. These projections must be
submitted prior to approval so the meter size can be placed on the final site plan. The proposed water meter must be
installed in a pit per City of Dover requirements and manufacturer’s recommendations. Also, a dual check valve is
required downstream of the meter.
5. The domestic service, fire main connection and valves must be clearly shown for each building. A valve must be
installed at the tee to isolate combined fire and domestic water service to the building from the water loop. Typically
this valve is installed at the tee or an acceptable distance from the building. A valve must be provided on the
domestic water service, which must be tapped off of the combined eight-inch (8”) fire/domestic service outside of the
building. The domestic water tap and valve should be as close to the building as possible. Typically, the domestic tap
and valve are located within five feet (5’) to ten feet (10’) of the building. A blow up detail of this layout is
recommended.
6. Provide a construction detail for the proposed restraining system for the fire main located within the buildings. The
Department of Public Works will test and inspect all fire mains to a blind flange located inside the buildings. The blind
flange with tap is used for hydrostatic pressure testing (200 psi for two (2) hours) and dechlorination. The flange must
be restrained in the direction of the pipe entering the facility. A pipe entering horizontally through a wall sleeve shall
be restrained with rods through the wall. A pipe entering vertically through a slab shall be restrained through the floor
to the ninety degree (90) bend and thrust block. All rods shall be a minimum of ¾” all thread. All pipes through walls
and slabs must be Class 52 cement lined ductile iron pipe. Confirm particulars to meet this requirement with
mechanical designer.
WASTEWATER
1. All wastewater utility components must meet the requirements of the Water Wastewater Handbook, effective date
March 22, 2010. Please contact our office for more information.
2. The following notes must be added to the plans:
a. Any existing sanitary sewer lines not to be utilized by the proposed facility must be properly abandoned at the
mains in accordance with the City of Dover Department of Public Works specifications and requirements.
b. Part II, Chapter 180, Article III, Section 180-10 of the Code of Kent County requires that “no person shall
discharge or cause to be discharged any stormwater, surface water, uncontaminated groundwater, roof runoff,
subsurface drainage, uncontaminated noncontact cooling water or unpolluted industrial process waters to any
sanitary sewer”, this shall include condensate. Sec. 110-231 of the City of Dover Code defines storm sewer as
“…any system used for conveying rain water, surface water, condensate, cooling water or similar liquid wastes,
Page 40
YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club
File #: C-14-02
April 2, 2014
Page 3 of 4
exclusive of sewage.” The contractor, developer, owner and designers shall ensure during construction that no
illegal discharges to the sanitary sewer system are created with the site improvements.
3. The size, length, slope, type and flow directions must be shown on all existing and proposed sanitary sewer lines.
Rim and invert elevations must be labeled on all sanitary structures, including cleanouts.
4. Cleanouts must be installed on sanitary sewer laterals within five feet (5’) of the building, one foot (1’) outside of the
right-of-way and at all bends. The maximum spacing between cleanouts shall be 100 feet. Any cleanout located
within a traffic bearing location shall be installed with a heavy duty cast iron frame and cover to prevent damage to the
cleanout and lateral.
5. Sizing (flow) calculations must be submitted for all sanitary sewer laterals (other than for single-family dwellings)
showing that velocity and all other requirements are met.
6. Calculations must be submitted that prove the downstream sanitary sewer main can properly convey the proposed
effluent produced by this project.
7. The minimum size of all sanitary sewer laterals shall be six-inch (6”).
8. All structures containing food service facilities require the installation of a minimum 1,000 gallon, two chamber grease
trap. All grease traps shall meet all current Kent County, Delaware Code of Ordinances requirements (Article III, §
180-13) A construction detail for the proposed grease trap, as well as the proposed location, must be provided on the
plan.
9. Final site plan approval will not be granted until confirmation is made that the existing septic tank will be properly
abandoned, per all DNREC requirements.
S TORMWATER
1. Final site plan approval will not be granted until a copy of the approved Stormwater/Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan from Kent Conservation District is submitted to our office.
S TREETS / SANITATION / GROUNDS
1. None.
GENERAL
1. All existing utilities shall be adjusted to final grade in accordance with current City of Dover requirements and
practices. This must be included as a note on the plan.
2. No trees may be planted within ten feet (10’) of underground utility infrastructure.
3. The final site plan must be submitted in the following compatible digital formats:
a. AutoCAD 2004 (.dwg format).
b. Adobe Reader (.pdf format).
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES
ELECTRIC
1. Owner must give the City of Dover Electric Department three (3) month notice prior to construction. Owner is
responsible for following the requirements outlined in the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. The handbook is
now available on the website at the following link: http://www.cityofdover.com/departments/electric/documents/.
WATER / STORMWATER / STREETS /SANITATION / GROUNDS / GENERAL
1. None.
WASTEWATER
1. This plan proposes a connection to a private sanitary sewer main on the property owned by English Village. As this is
not owned, operated or maintained by the City of Dover, an easement and maintenance agreement between YMCA
and English Village prior to approval.
2. Further detail must be provided on the proposed “Hygiene Hut”, including, but not limited to, plumbing fixtures and
use. Depending on the information provided, further comments may be required.
Page 41
YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club
File #: C-14-02
April 2, 2014
Page 4 of 4
A DVISORY COMMENTS TO THE A PPLICANT
ELECTRIC
1. None
WATER
1. Hydrant flow testing is currently only performed during the spring and fall. The applicant must call the Department of
Public Works directly to schedule these tests. This applies to both existing hydrants as well as those proposed for the
site.
2. Depending on the additional number of fixtures proposed with this project, additional impact fees may be assessed to
this property.
WASTEWATER
1. The proposed layout of sanitary sewer infrastructure will not be owned, operated or maintained by the City of Dover, it
is considered private.
2. Prior to plan approval, the sanitary sewer system plans may be required to be submitted to the DNREC, Division of
Water Resources, Surface Water Discharges Section for review and approval. The owner/developer is responsible
for providing all application fees, completed forms and plan sets directly to DNREC.
3. Sanitary Sewer impact fees will be assessed to this property.
SANITATION
1. Sanitation service must be provided by a private contractor.
S TORMWATER / S TREETS / G ROUNDS
1. None
GENERAL
1. Construction plans will not be reviewed by our office unless all previous comments have been clearly addressed
within the plan set and accordingly identified within an itemized response letter and with the Water/Wastewater Initial
Plan Submission Checklist, which can be obtained from the following website: https://imageserv9.team-
logic.com/mediaLibrary/198/WaterWastewaterHandbookFinal_1.pdf, page 88.
I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE
C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .
Page 42
C F
I I
CITY OF DOVER T R
Y E
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
O M
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY F A
R
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: April 9, 2014 D S
O H
V A
E L
APPLICATION: 825 Kenton Rd, YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club
R
FILE #: C-14-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal
CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Deputy Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY,
AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF
EXPERTISE.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY
THE APPLICANT:
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
Project to be completed per approved Site Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
Future building projects may require a fire hydrant placed within the complex
After any application has been approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant has a
maximum of thirty (30) days to appeal to the Code Board of Appeals Committee.
All comments from this office, approved by the Planning Commission are at the expense of the
owner/applicant.
The City of Dover uses the 2012 NFPA Life Safety Code, 2009 IBC, latest editions of all other
NFPA Codes and the 2012 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations.
The Dover Fire Department request that a 8 ½ X 11 copy of the floor plan and site plan be
submitted to Station 1, attention Fire Chief, prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued.
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above
contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible.
Page 43
CITY OF DOVER D
E
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
L
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D
O
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: April 2, 2014 T
===============================================================
APPLICATION: YMCA of Delaware Kent Swim Club at 825 Kenton Road
FILE#: C-14-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT
CONTACT PERSON: Julio F. Seneus PHONE#: 760-2145
===============================================================
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT:
CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1. Per Section 3.6.5 of the Standards and Regulations for Subdivision Streets and
State Highway Access Adopted February 15, 2010, an 80-foot wide right-of-
way (40-feet from the centerline) is required for a major collector. According
to the Kent County Classification Maps, KCR 157 (Walker Road) is classified
as a major collector road. If the existing right-of-way does not have the proper
width along the frontage of the site, the department will require 40-feet of
right-of-way dedication from the innermost edge of the through lane for
public use.
2. Per Section 3.6.5 of the Standards and Regulations for Subdivision Streets and
State Highway Access Adopted February 15, 2010, an 80-foot wide right-of-
way (40-feet from the centerline) is required for a minor arterial. According to
the Kent County Classification Maps, KCR 104 (Kenton Road) is classified as
a minor arterial road. If the existing right-of-way does not have the proper
width along the frontage of the site, the department will require 40-feet of
right-of-way dedication from the innermost edge of the through lane for
public use.
3. ADA compliant sidewalk must be installed along the southern portion of the
site on Kenton Road. However, the Department will allow a payment towards
the Kent County Sidewalk and Multi-use path (MUP) Fund in lieu of
constructing the sidewalk. The developer must submit to the Department an
amount of $8,240 for the construction of the sidewalk. I have attached the cost
and estimation spreadsheet of the sidewalk for your review. In addition, the
Page 44
Letter of No Objection (LONOR) will not be released this project until the fee
is received and processed by the Department.
4. In order to be issued an entrance plan approval, the Department will require the
applicant to provide the proper forms, fees, and plans.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the planning department as soon as possible.
Page 45
CITY OF DOVER
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
April 2014
APPLICATION: YMCA Delaware Kent Swim Club
FILE #: C-14-02
REVIEWING AGENCY: Kent Conservation District
CONTACT PERSON: David C. Cahill PHONE #: 741-2600 ext.3
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND
COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE
FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE
APPLICANT:
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1. Kent Conservation District has no objection to conditional use site plan of the above referenced site.
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
1. The sanitary sewer show on the plan may require a standard utility plan approval from the Conservation
District.
2. If at any time expansion or earth disturbing activity (clearing, grubbing tree clearing etc.) takes place and
exceeds 5000 square feet; a detailed Sediment and Stormwater Management Plan must be submitted and
approved to the Kent Conversation District.
Page 47
City of Dover
DATA SHEET FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OF April 9, 2014
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF April 21, 2014
Plan Title: Woodland Tree Clearing Plan of 560 Bay Road
Plan Type: Site Development Plan (Woodland Tree Clearing Plan)
Property Location: West side of Bay Road across from the Blue Hen Corporate Center
Property Addresses: 560 Bay Road, Dover
Tax Parcels: ED-05-077.00-01-10.00-000
Owner: S.H.E Holdings, LLC
Site Area: 12.9371 acres +/-
Zoning Classification: C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone)
Waiver Requested: Request to Exceed Maximum Tree Clearing on site
Woodland Mitigation Plan Review
P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903
Community Excellence Through Quality Service
Page 48
City of
CITY OF DOVER Dover
Planning
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Office
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: April 9, 2014
APPLICATION: Woodland Tree Clearing Plan at 560 Bay Road
FILE #: S-14-08 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Planning
CONTACT PERSON: Dawn Melson-Williams, AICP PHONE #: (302) 736-7196
PLAN SUMMARY:
This a Site Development Plan for Woodland Tree Clearing to permit the clearing of
approximately 7.45 acres +/- of trees on a 12.67 acre +/- parcel. No buildings or paving are
proposed by this plan. This proposal is associated with the Woodland Tree Mitigation Plan at the
Anne McClements Woodland Tract (Fork Branch Nature Preserve) previously approved by the
Planning Commission on April 19, 2010 with Application S-10-03 South Dover Plaza. The
Woodland Mitigation Plan was implemented and completed by October 2013. The property is
zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone). The property is located on the southwest side of Bay
Road. The owner of record is S.H.E. Holdings, LLC. Property Address: 560 Bay Road. Tax
Parcel: ED-05-077.00-01-10.00-000. Council District 2.
Previous Application
On April 19, 2010, the Planning Commission granted conditional approval of a Site
Development Master Plan (S-10-03) for the construction of a four commercial retail buildings
known as the South Dover Plaza on the properties at 560 and 600 Bay Road. The project was
granted an extension of approval for the start of Phase 1 on March 21, 2011 and a second
extension of approval on February 21 2012. As a result of the extensions, the approval for the
South Dover Plaza project was to expire on April 30, 2013. The plan has expired as the
Administrative Site Plan for first phase was not finalized and no construction activity
commenced. An associated application (V-10-02) to the Board of Adjustment where variances
associated with required lot width per building were granted in March 2010 has also expired.
SITE CONSIDERATIONS
Site Entrance
The site will utilize the existing access point to Bay Road (labeled as U.S. Route 113) in the
northeast corner of the property to serve as the stabilized construction entrance for the proposed
tree clearing project. The site does not have sidewalks along the Bay Road frontage; however,
the implementation of sidewalks will not be required for consideration of this Woodland
Clearing Plan. Permanent site entrances and street frontage sidewalks will be reviewed with any
future redevelopment plan for the property.
Page 49
S-14-08 Woodland Tree Clearing Plan of 560 Bay Road
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 2
TREE CLEARING PLAN
A written waiver request to exceed the maximum amount of tree clearing on the property at 560
Bay Road and Woodland Mitigation Plan has been submitted to the Planning Office for
consideration by the Planning Commission.
Waiver Request: Request to Exceed Woodland Clearing
The site has approximately 7.45 acres of woodland as shown on the Tree Clearing Plan sheet and
documented in the Woodland Delineation Report (dated May 2005) for the project site. The Site
Plan proposes to clear all of the woodland on the site. The proposal to clear all of the woodland
on the site exceeds the 50% amount of woodland clearing permitted in the Zoning Ordinance.
(Article 5 Section 16.53). A waiver to exceed the 50% clearing of woodland may be granted by
the Planning Commission; however, mitigation for the tree clearing occurs in the form of
planting new woodland areas. (Article 5 Section 16.91b). See excerpt from Zoning Ordinance.
Article 5 §16.9 Tree mitigation.
16.91 Planning commission waiver. The planning commission may waive the provisions of
[sub]sections 16.52, 16.53, and 16.62, and require replacement planting for mitigation purposes
should the planning commission determine, after demonstration by the applicant, that due to
physical limitations of the land which would otherwise prohibit the reasonable use of the land, or
for purposes of preserving, protecting and promoting the interest of public health, safety, welfare
and/or public convenience. All tree mitigation plantings must occur within the corporate limits of
the City of Dover. Tree mitigation may occur off-site in accordance with the provisions listed
below in this ordinance:
(a) If a waiver is sought from the provisions of § [subsection] 16.62, new tree plantings are
required at a rate of 1:1. All new tree plantings shall meet the minimum size at planting
requirements of the City of Dover table of trees.
(b) If a waiver is sought from the provisions of § [subsection] 16.52 and/or § [subsection] 16.53,
then mitigation must be in the form of newly created woodland areas. New woodlands shall be
created at a rate of 1.25 times the amount of woodlands to be removed. A woodland mitigation
plan shall be prepared by a licensed forester, landscape architect, or certified nursery
professional, for the consideration of the planning commission.
(c) All tree mitigation must occur on-site unless an off-site location is specifically approved by
the planning commission. When considering off-site locations for tree mitigation, the commission
shall consider:
1) A physical hardship related to the land which would otherwise prohibit compliance on
the subject site;
2) Whether the mitigation plan proposed by the applicant is superior in terms of
environmental benefits, tree quantity, or aesthetic qualities compared to strict compliance
with the ordinance on-site.
In this case, the mitigation shall occur as newly created woodland at a rate of 1.25 times the
amount cleared. For this site the existing woodland area is 7.45 acres whereas, 3.725 acres could
be cleared without mitigation. For the remaining 3.725 acres of woodland cleared above the
maximum clearing threshold, the new woodland area must be 4.65 acres. Plan indicates the
cleared area will be stabilized with grass plantings.
Review of Woodland Mitigation Plan
Tree mitigation shall occur on-site unless an off-site location is approved by the Planning
Commission (Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 Section 16.91c). The tree mitigation for this site was
Page 50
S-14-08 Woodland Tree Clearing Plan of 560 Bay Road
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 3
proposed to occur on a State-owned parcel of land located on Kenton Road known as the Anne
McClements Woodland Tract (Fork Branch Nature Preserve) in a Mitigation Plan previously
approved by the Planning Commission in 2010. The details of the tree planting plan were
outlined in the Forest Mitigation Plan Report (Dated March 2006 and as proposed for
amendment by letter of 10/16/2009).
A plan sheet entitled Woodland Mitigation Plan (dated 3/1/2006) shows the areas of potential
planting on the east side of Kenton Road. The plan shows planting in three areas: Old Field
Mitigation Area of 0.3241 acres, Scrub/Shrub Mitigation Area of 1.7937 acres, and Agricultural
Mitigation Area of 2.8920 acres. This totals to 5.0098 acres+/- for the mitigation planting areas.
The Letter of 10/16/2009 describes the planting of 140 trees throughout a 2.12 acre field and a
2.9 acre scrub-shrub/forested area. Copies of the Woodland (Forest) Mitigation Plan Report
(March 2006 and as proposed for amendment by letter of 10/16/2009) have been provided.
A note on the Tree Clearing Plan indicated that the Woodland Mitigation Plan (of March 2006)
was implemented and the mitigation was completed on October 17, 2013 and a letter of October
25, 2013 documenting the planting of 140 trees. Thus, the Woodland Mitigation Plan was
implemented prior to the tree clearing on the subject site.
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN
CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S
AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE.
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1) Review of the application by the City’s Property Maintenance/Code Enforcement
Division notes that the property owner S.H.E. Holdings, LLC has outstanding fines
related to violations on the property at 600 Bay Road. The provisions of the “Clean
Hands Ordinance” prohibit City actions and approvals associated with delinquent
properties. In accordance with the provisions of Dover Code, Chapter 1, Sec. 1-
13. Denial of permits or approvals for failure to comply with requirements for payment,
actions, or filing these outstanding fines must be paid prior to action by the Planning
Commission on the subject application S-14-08. Contact the Code Enforcement Division
at (302)736-7010 for more information.
2) The maximum amount of tree clearing shall be complied with in accordance to the Zoning
Ordinance unless a waiver is granted by the Planning Commission and acceptance of the
Woodland Mitigation Plan (as already implemented) is also approved as the mitigation for
the tree clearing. A written waiver request to exceed the maximum amount of tree clearing
has been submitted to the Planning Office for consideration by the Planning Commission.
3) A letter of October 25, 2013 from DNREC – Delaware Division of Parks and Recreation
documents the completion of the initial tree plantings as outlined to be implemented in the
Woodland Mitigation Plan. Also submit to the Planning Office copies of the Monitoring
Reports on the five acre mitigation site in the Fork Branch Nature Preserve following the
completion of any monitoring activities.
Page 51
S-14-08 Woodland Tree Clearing Plan of 560 Bay Road
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 4
4) Revise the following on the Tree Clearing Plan:
a. Revise the street name from U.S. Route 113 to Bay Road on all Plan Sheets. This street
segment is no longer identified as U.S. Route 113.
b. The building on the Lands of Peterson is not a restaurant building; update.
c. Update ownership of property at 600 Bay Road (shown as owned by H.B.H Investors).
5) Provide the following information in the Plan Data Column on the Tree Clearing Plan Sheet:
a. The Plan will need to be updated to reflect any changes recommended or approvals or
waivers granted by the Planning Commission.
b. List the amount of existing woodlands.
c. Check number of Plan Data column items.
d. Item #27 – list the date of Planning Commission action on the Off-Site Tree Mitigation
Plan.
e. Delete Item #27 that refers to Planning Commission review of architectural elevations.
f. Delete Item #35 that refers to the Board of Adjustment action on the lot width variance.
The approval of this variance has expired.
g. Delete Item #40 as lane closures will not apply to this tree clearing project.
h. In the Sequence of Construction, add a requirement for a City of Dover Administrative
Building Permit to track tree clearing project and add notification of the Kent
Conservation District.
6) Indicate the following on the Woodland Mitigation Plan Sheet.
a. Indicate the number of trees planted and types of trees planted.
b. Reference the Report documents and any approved modifications.
c. Indicate any special conditions for management of the mitigation plantings.
d. Document implementation of Woodland Mitigation Plan and monitoring.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
1) Recommendation on Waiver Requests:
a. Exceed maximum amount of woodland clearing: Staff recognizes the poor quality make-
up of the existing woodland on the property at 560 Bay Road and recommends the
applicant maintain any woodland area not proposed for development while pursuing
approval of a Woodland Mitigation Plan for the areas exceeding the clearing maximum.
b. Woodland Mitigation Plan: Staff supports the Woodland Mitigation Plan developed in
conjunction with DNREC-Division of Parks & Recreation for the McClements Woodland
Tract at the Fork Branch Nature Preserve (Forest Mitigation Plan dated March 2006 and
as proposed for amendment by Letter of 10/16/2009). Staff recommends acceptance of
the Mitigation Plan as implemented in 2013. The Plan mitigates the successional poor
quality woodland located on the property at 560 Bay Road with a quality reforestation of
a large contiguous natural area.
i. Staff requests copies of the annual Forest Monitoring Reports. Document of
completion of the initial planting has been received.
Page 52
S-14-08 Woodland Tree Clearing Plan of 560 Bay Road
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 5
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
1) In the event, that major changes and revisions to the Tree Clearing Site Plan occur in the
finalization of the Plan contact the Department of Planning and Inspections. These
changes may require resubmittal for review by the Development Advisory Committee,
Planning Commission, or other agencies and commissions making recommendations in
regards to the plan.
2) Following Planning Commission approval of the Tree Clearing Plan, the Plan must be
revised to meet all conditions of approval from the Development Advisory Committee or
as otherwise noted. A Check Print must be submitted for review by Planning Office Staff
and the other commenting agencies. Upon determination that the Plan is complete and all
agency approvals have been received, copies of the Plan may be submitted for final
endorsement.
3) Other agencies and departments which participate in the Development Advisory
Committee may provide additional comments related to their areas of expertise and code
requirements.
4) The applicant/developer shall be aware that prior to any ground disturbing activities on
the site the appropriate site inspections and permits are required. An Administrative
Building Permit application will be required to track the activities of the Tree Clearing.
5) Tree clearing activities may have an effect on the adjacent properties. Any work
requiring the closing or rerouting of residents or visitors to adjacent properties should be
coordinated as to offer the least amount of inconvenience to the adjacent property
owners.
6) The applicant shall be aware that Site Development Plan review and approval will be
required for the redevelopment of the property including any proposed addition of
impervious surfaces, buildings, etc. to the existing property.
7) The applicant shall be aware that Site Development Plan approval does not represent a
Sign Permit, nor does it convey permission to place any sign on the premises. Any
proposed site shall require a Sign Permit from the City of Dover prior to placement of
any such sign.
8) The applicant shall be aware that Site development Plan approval does not represent a
Building Permit and associated construction activity permits. A separate application
process is required for issuance of a Building Permit from the City of Dover.
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible.
Page 53
CITY OF DOVER
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: APRIL 2, 2014
APPLICATION: Woodland Tree Clearing Plan, 560 Bay Rd
FILE #: S-14-08
REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric and Public Works Departments
CONTACT PERSON: Aren Wright - Electric
Jason A. Lyon, P.E. – Public Works
CONTACT PHONE #: Electric - 302-736-7070 Public Works – 302-736-7025
T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN
A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE .
T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT :
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS
ELECTRIC
1. The roadway and curbing must be in.
2. The right-of-way must be within 6" of final grade.
3. The property corners must be staked.
4. Owner is responsible for locating all water, sewer, and storm sewer lines.
5. Owner is responsible for installing all conduits and equipment pads per the City of Dover Engineering Department
specifications.
6. Owner is responsible for site and/or street lighting.
7. Meter locations will be determined by City of Dover Engineering Department.
8. Load sheets and AutoCAD compatible DXF or DWG diskettes of site plans, including driveways, are required prior to
receiving approved electrical construction drawings.
9. Any relocation of existing electrical equipment will be engineered by the City of Dover Electric Department. Developer
may be required to perform a quantity of the relocation. Any work performed by the City of Dover will be at the
owner’s expense.
10. Prior to construction, owner is responsible for granting an easement to the City of Dover Electric
Department. Easement forms will be furnished and prepared by the City of Dover Electric Engineering Department.
11. Fees will be assessed upon final site plans. The owner will be responsible for fees assessed prior to
construction. Owner is required to sign off plans prepared by the Electric Department.
12. Must maintain 10' clearance around all electrical equipment, unless pre-approved by the City of Dover Electric
Engineering Department.
13. Prior to the completion of any/all designs and estimates, the owner is responsible for providing the Electric
Engineering Department with a physical address of the property.
14. All Engineering and design for Dover Electric will be engineered upon final approved plans. All Engineering work will
be furnished by the City’s Electric Engineering Department.
Page 54
Woodland Tree Clearing Plan
File #: S-14-08
April 2, 2014
Page 2 of 2
WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GROUNDS / GENERAL
1. No objection to this proposal.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES
ELECTRIC
1. Owner must give the City of Dover Electric Department three (3) months notice prior to construction. Owner is
responsible for following the requirements outlined in the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. The handbook is
now available on the website at the following link: http://www.cityofdover.com/departments/electric/documents/.
WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GROUNDS / GENERAL
1. None.
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT
ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / SANITATION / STORMWATER / STREETS / GROUNDS / GENERAL
1. In the future, if this site is developed, it shall be held to all applicable requirements of the City of Dover, pertaining to
Site Plan or Subdivision submission.
I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE
C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .
Page 55
CITY OF DOVER D
E
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
L
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D
O
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: April 2, 2014 T
===============================================================
APPLICATION: Woodland Tree Clearing Plan of 560 Bay Road
FILE#: S-14-08 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT
CONTACT PERSON: Julio F. Seneus PHONE#: 760-2145
===============================================================
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT:
CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1. The department has no comments.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the planning department as soon as possible.
Page 56
CITY OF DOVER
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
April 2014
APPLICATION: Woodlands Tree Clearing Plan 560 Bay Road
FILE #: S-14-08
REVIEWING AGENCY: Kent Conservation District
CONTACT PERSON: David C. Cahill PHONE #: 741-2600 ext.3
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN
IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT:
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1. As of January 1, 2014 the new Delaware Stormwater Regulations have taken effect.
2. A Stormwater Assessment Study (SAS) package must be submitted to the Kent Conservation District prior
to a pre application meeting being scheduled.
3. As the disturbance for this site will exceed 5,000 square feet, a detailed sediment and stormwater management plan
must be reviewed and approved by our office prior to any land disturbing activity (i.e. clearing, grubbing, filling,
grading, etc.) taking place. The review fee and a completed Application for a Detailed Plan are due at the time of
plan submittal to our office. Construction inspection fees based on developed area and stormwater facility
maintenance inspection fees based on the number of stormwater facilities are due prior to the start of construction.
Please refer to the fee schedule for those amounts.
4. The following notes must appear on the record plan:
The Kent Conservation District reserves the right to enter private property for purposes of periodic site
inspection.
The Kent Conservation District reserves the right to add, modify, of delete any erosion or sediment
control measure, as it deems necessary.
A clear statement of defined maintenance responsibility for stormwater management facilities must be
provided on the Record Plan.
5. A soils investigation supporting the stormwater management facility design is required to determine impacts of the
seasonal high groundwater level and soils for any basin design.
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
1. The change in land use cover requires that the project be subject to sediment and stormwater management plan
approval.
2. Green Technologies (bio retention, bio swales etc.) must be considered before traditional facilities can be considered.
3. The preferred methods of stormwater management are those practices that maximize the use of the natural features
of a site, promote recharge and minimize the reliance on structural components.
4. It is recommended that the stormwater management areas be incorporated into the overall landscape plan to enhance
water quality and to make the stormwater facility an attractive community amenity.
5. A letter of no objection to recordation will be provided once the detailed Sediment and Stormwater Management
plan has been approved.
Page 57
PETITION TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT
Report to the
Dover Planning Commission
April 21, 2014
Proposed Change: Amendment to Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 –District Regulations,
Section 2 – General Residence Zones (RG-1 and RG-2), to add a
new conditional use.
Summary of Amendment: The proposed amendment was sponsored by members of City
Council in response to a constituent request. The amendment
would add allow for professional offices as a conditional use
within the General Residence Zones on State Street and Governors
Avenue between Mary and Water Streets and on the entirety of
Route 8. Maps are provided as an attachment to this report to
show what parcels currently meet the criteria to be considered for
professional offices under the proposed amendment.
Ordinance Number: 2014-05
File Number: MI-14-02
Page 58
FIRST READING
CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-05
1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL
2 MET:
3 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 2 - General residence zones (RG-1 and
4 RG-2), Subsection 2.4 - Conditional Uses, of the Dover Code be amended by re-designating existing
5 subsection (d) as subsection (e), and inserting a new subsection (d) to read as follows:
6 (d) Professional offices may be permitted on State Street and Governors Avenue between Water Street
7 and Mary Street, and on Route 8 in its entirety, subject to the following restrictions:
8 i. The office operations shall be conducted in such a manner as to maintain the residential
9 character of the surrounding neighborhood, and no changes or improvements shall be made to
10 the premises which might preclude utilization of the premises for residential purposes in the
11 future.
12 ii. There shall be no other professional office located in the same zoning district within 250 feet
13 of the premises.
14 iii. No display of products or goods shall be visible from the street.
15 iv. There shall be no exterior effects such as noise, traffic, odor, dust, smoke, gas, fumes,
16 radiation, or electromagnetic interference.
17 v. A minimum of two (2) off-street parking spaces shall be required.
18 vi. No more than four (4) off-street parking spaces shall be permitted. Furthermore, all off-street
19 spaces shall be visually screened from adjacent residential uses, to the greatest extent possible,
20 by employing a landscape screen no less than six and one half (6½) feet high, which landscape
21 screen shall be properly maintained throughout the duration of the professional office use on
22 the subject premises.
23 vii. Signage shall be limited to one (1) sign, not to exceed six (6) square feet in area. No sign may
24 be illuminated.
25 viii. The hours of operation shall not commence prior to 6:00 a.m. and shall cease no later than
26 8:00 p.m., with no more than six (6) employees engaged in the operations upon the premises
27 at any given time.
28 ix. The Planning Commission shall have the authority to impose such additional conditions and
29 restrictions as may be necessary or appropriate to protect the general health, safety, and welfare
30 of the residents of surrounding properties.
31 ADOPTED: *
32 S:\ORDINANCES\2014\DRAFT\Ordinance #2014-05 Amending Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 2 - General Residence-First Reading.wpd
33 SYNOPSIS
34 The proposed ordinance would allow professional offices as a conditional use within the
35 General Residence Zone on State Street and Governors Avenue between Water Street and
36 Mary Street, and on Route 8 in its entirety, subject to a series of restrictions. Under the
37 proposed ordinance, the establishment of such an office would be subject to conditional use
38 approval, which includes a public hearing before the Planning Commission.
39 (SPONSORS: BONAR, HUTCHISON, AND LYNN)
40 Actions History
41 03/24/2014 - Scheduled for First Reading
42 03/10/2014 - Introduced at Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee
Page 59
CITY OF DOVER
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: APRIL 2, 2014
APPLICATION: TEXT AMENDMENT: REVISIONS TO CONDITIONAL
USES IN RG-1/RG-1
FILE #: MI-14-02
REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric and Public Works Departments
CONTACT PERSON: Aren Wright - Electric
Jason A. Lyon – Public Works
CONTACT PHONE #: ELECTRIC - 302-736-7070 PUBLIC WORKS – 302-736-7025
T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN
A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE .
T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT :
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS
ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER / SANITATION / STREETS / GROUNDS
1. Our office has no objections to the proposed amendments.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES
ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER / SANITATION / STREETS / GROUNDS
1. None
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT
ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER / SANITATION / STREETS / GROUNDS
1. None.
I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE
C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .
Page 60
C F
I I
CITY OF DOVER T R
Y E
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
O M
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY F A
R
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: 04/09/14 D S
O H
V A
E L
R
APPLICATION: Revisions to Conditional Uses in RG-1/RG-2
FILE #: MI-14-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal
CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Deputy Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY,
AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF
EXPERTISE.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY
THE APPLICANT:
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
Any gas fired HVAC equipment must be equipped with emergency cut off switches remotely
located.
Address numbers of at least 12 inches in height must be placed on the street side of the building
visible from the street. Label all suites
Any natural or LP gas bottles, meters, values, regulators, etc., must have impact protection.
Full building and fire plan review is required.
Building cannot be occupied or construction or renovations started until completion of building
and fire plan review.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
Any change of use will need building and fire plan review and approval
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
Page 61
After any application has been approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant has a
maximum of thirty (30) days to appeal to the Code Board of Appeals Committee.
All comments from this office, approved by the Planning Commission are at the expense of the
owner/applicant.
The City of Dover uses the 2012 NFPA Life Safety Code, 2009 IBC, latest editions of all other
NFPA Codes and the 2012 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations.
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible.
Page 62
EXCERPTS FROM DRAFT MEETING MINTUES OF THE DOVER CITY COUNCIL
MEETING OF MARCH 24, 2014
FROM PAGE 1 and PAGE 2
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
The Regular Council Meeting was held on March 24, 2014 at 7:30 p.m. with Council
President Bonar presiding. Council members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Perza,
Mr. Slavin, Mrs. Williams, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Lynn was absent.
Council staff members present were Police Chief Hosfelt, Mrs. Mitchell, Mr. Koenig,
Mrs. Townshend, Fire Chief Carey, City Solicitor Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Mayor
Carey was also present.
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council
Meeting. Council President Bonar declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those
present that Council was not in official session and could not take formal action.
Mr. EShed Alston, 406 Arnold Court, stated that his family name, Alston, is Swedish in origin
and that there is a rural marker designated “Alston Branch” en route to Smyrna. He advised
members that he recently attended a Federal District Court hearing for a case involving dog
fighting and cruelty to animals charges against Mr. Hazzard. He reminded members that
last year, he and Professor Jahi Issa were threatened with a pit bull dog. They attempted to use
the same prosecutory authority on their behalf but to no avail. Mr. Alston expressed his
belief that there is a status arrangement in the State of Delaware whereby a black dog has
better civil rights than a black man. He explained that the State of Delaware will prosecute
when a black litigant, in this case, Mr. Hazzard, uses a black dog as an instrument of
crime. However, a black dog was used by a Caucasian as an instrument of crime against
himself and Dr. Issa, and no action had been taken as of one (1) year later. Mr. Alston stated
that the goal should be for everyone to have a cohesive understanding for the betterment of
the entire community. He stated that limitations should not be placed on a citizen’s right to be
heard but rather on the government. It was his opinion that the state that had existed the longest,
Delaware, had changed the least in this regard.
Mr. Joseph D’Urso, 305 N. State Street, relayed concerns regarding Proposed Ordinance #2014-
05, which would allow professional offices as a conditional use within the General Residence
Zones on State Street and Governors Avenue between Water Street and Mary Street, and on
Route 8 in its entirety. He stated that he, his family, and neighbors were most concerned
about safety issues. Mr. D’Urso also expressed concern regarding the proposed boundaries,
explaining that his property is located between Mary Street and Hazel Street and that the
proposed ordinance extends to Mary Street. He requested that consideration be given to
extending the boundary to Washington Street to bring it into conformity with the present RG-1
zoning classification. (City Clerk’s Office Note: Proposed Ordinance #2014-05 was
scheduled for consideration during the latter part of the meeting.)
Excerpts of City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 5
Page 63
Ms. Yvonne Hall, 228 N. State Street, stated that she was not opposed to
Proposed Ordinance #2014-05; however, she requested reassurance that there would not be
changes to the appearance of the City’s Victorian/Historic District. She advised members that she,
along with several other neighbors, wanted to be sure that there would not be additional
apartments, explaining that there had been several issues involving those apartments
currently established in the area. Ms. Hall noted that there were 21 homes along North State
Street that currently have an RG-1 zoning
classification and that these homeowners desire assurance that there will not be a lot of changes
that would affect their neighborhood. She indicated that the property owners along North State
Street are not currently provided safety and the area is not quiet or trash free. Ms. Hall explained
that these residents were requesting assurance of ample parking if businesses are permitted,
since there was currently a lack of parking. (City Clerk’s Office Note: Proposed Ordinance
#2014-05 was scheduled for consideration during the latter part of the meeting.)
Mrs. Nancy Gardner, 213 N. State Street, stated that she and her husband had been residents
for 40 years and had seen all types of changes during that time - some for the better and others
for the worse. She felt that if the changes were made as stipulated in Proposed Ordinance
#2014-05, then the City must enforce them equitably. She noted that she resided between two (2)
buildings, one (1) of which was converted from single-family to multi-rental, and had not
observed equitable attention to either historic district requirements or the law/spirit under which
the historic district was created. Mrs. Gardner indicated that she had observed substantial
violations of building codes, etc., and realized that the City works extremely hard in code
enforcement in those neighborhoods that have more difficulty. She stated that it had become
apparent that she and her husband should live in a one
(1) floor dwelling; however, selling their home, which is located between two (2) buildings that
are non-conforming and continuously becoming more non-conforming, would be difficult and
frustrating. In addition, Mrs. Gardner suggested that residents be notified of any
proposed amendments through the media, such as the local newspapers, rather than being
dependent upon neighbors. (City Clerk’s Office Note: Proposed Ordinance #2014-05 was
scheduled for consideration during the latter part of the meeting.)
Responding, Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community
Development, explained that Proposed Ordinance #2014-05, which amends the Zoning Code,
would have a First Reading, public hearings before both the Planning Commission and City
Council, and a Final Reading prior to adoption. She noted that the public hearings would be
advertised in the newspaper. Mrs. Townshend offered to meet with anyone with questions prior
to these public hearings if the matter was referred beyond a First Reading.
At the request of Mr. Slavin, Mrs. Townshend explained that the process for consideration of
a zoning text amendment involves two (2) months of meetings prior to any final action being
taken.
Ms. Paula Kinsey, 224 N. State Street, reminded members that, two (2) years ago, members of
City Council authorized her to open “Tea for Two” at 224 N. State Street. She indicated that it
had been very successful and had served thousands of people from all over the State of
Delaware. For years, she had heard that Dover needed “something” and suggested that “Tea for
Two” should be only a beginning and that other such improvements should continue along State
Excerpts of City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 5
Page 64
Street. Ms. Kinsey stated that Wesley College had beautiful office buildings and business
localities on State Street. However, she felt that the area around The Green was deteriorating
rather than improving, noting that the buildings were in disrepair and appearing more
commercialized. She advised members that properties along State Street continued to
deteriorate, with buildings becoming fire hazards, etc., and felt that the City should review the
area for possible improvements.
The invocation was given by Councilman Perza, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
EXCERPTS FROM PAGE 8 and PAGES 9-12
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE REPORT - MARCH 10, 2014
The Parks, Recreation, and Community En ancement Committee met on
March 10, 2014 with Chairman Dixon presiding.
Proposed Ordinances Amending Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District
Regulations
Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised
members that the proposed ordinances amending Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 -
District Regulations, were being presented at the request of Mr. John Paradee, on behalf of
his clients, and that the required sponsorship from members of City Council had been
obtained.
#2014-05 Amending Section 2 - General Residence Zones (RG-1 and RG-2),
Subsection 2.4 - Conditional Uses (Sponsors: Bonar, Hutchison, and Lynn)
Mrs. Townshend explained that Proposed Ordinance #2014-05 would amend Section 2
- General Residence Zones (RG-1 and RG-2), Subsection 2.4 - Conditional Uses by
allowing professional offices as a conditional use within the General Residence Zone
on State Street and Governors Avenue between Water Street and Mary Street, and on
Route 8 in its entirety. The proposed ordinance includes provisions that would
protect the character of the residential area and would allow professional offices as
a conditional use, subject to a public hearing and review by the Planning
Commission.
Staff recommended adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2014-05.
Responding to Mr. Hutchison, Mrs. Townshend stated that most of the properties
along State Street and Governors Avenue would be subject to the proposed
amendment. She noted that the Wesley College properties are not zoned General
Residence. She indicated that the proposed amendment would primarily affect the
older Victorian homes along State and Division Streets; however, it was her
estimation that there was not a large number of such properties.
Excerpts of City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 5
Page 65
In response to Mr. Perza regarding feedback from members of the
residential communities along State Street, Governors Avenue, or Route 8
regarding this proposal, Mrs. Townshend stated that Mr. Rhett Ruggerio, the
property owner who requested the proposed amendment, in conjunction with
his attorney, Mr. John Paradee, met and worked very closely with the
neighbors of his property (north of Division Street - Delaware Avenue,
Pennsylvania Avenue, Maple Avenue, etc.) to address any concerns they may
have had. Mrs Townsend reminded members that Mr. Ruggerio originally
requested a rezoning; however, due to the large variety of uses allowed in the
General Residence and Office (RGO) zone and not allowed in the General
Residence Zone, the residents seemed more comfortable with the conditional use
approach within the residential zone. She noted that owners were having
difficulty selling older Victorian homes along State and Division Streets and that
the proposed amendment would assure that the properties are maintained.
Mrs. Townshend explained that the process would require an application for
each property to the Planning Commission and would provide required public
notices and public hearings, etc. She confirmed that there were parking
requirements which would be regulated through the permit process.
The Committee recommended adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2014-05, as
recommended by staff.
During the Council Meeting of March 24, 2014, members considered the Proposed Ordinance.
Mr. Anderson moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr.
Hutchison.
Mr. Slavin noted that the proposed amendment was initiated after a single rezoning request
for property located on Division Street did not receive support. He questioned why this matter was
now being presented for all properties along Division Street and some property along State
Street. Responding, Mrs. Townshend explained that the individual rezoning request, for
property located on Division Street, was for a zoning classification of General Residence and
Office (RG-O). She indicated that the neighboring residents were very concerned with the array
of uses permitted in the RG-O zoning classification, which could include apartments. During the
public hearing before the Planning Commission, these concerned residents indicated that they
were not in opposition to an office but were in opposition to the other permitted uses within the
RG-O zoning classification. At that point, she indicated that there was discussion regarding
the possibility of creating a very narrowly defined conditional use that would allow
professional offices with proper distancing requirements within the RG-1 and RG-2 zones
along those major roads, rather than changing the zoning of the property, which would allow
uses that would be considered objectionable.
Referring to the off-street parking requirements for offices, Mr. Slavin stated that this would
require traffic to flow through the alleyways of North State Street (both east and west alleys)
near many of the properties along Division and State Streets. Confirming, Mrs. Townshend stated
Excerpts of City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5
Page 66
that a minimum of two (2) parking spaces would be required for off-street parking, which is the
same requirement
for a residence, and a maximum of four (4) parking spaces; therefore, these requirements would limit
the size of any type of office establishment. As a resident who lives along one (1) of those alleys,
Mr. Slavin relayed his concern that these alleys are not engineered for additional traffic.
In response to Mrs. Williams, Mrs. Townshend explained that, if the ordinance were adopted, a
conditional use application would be required for any professional office to be established in the
area. As a result, information relevant to a specific property would be submitted and public notice
would be provided that would include a mailing to property owners within 200 feet, a legal ad in the
newspaper, and posting at the property. At that point, residents would be given the opportunity to
express their concerns. She concurred that there may be properties that cannot feasibly provide the
specific requirements, but there are others than can. She reminded members that with a conditional
use application, these types of issues and requirements are reviewed by the Planning Commission
on an individual basis. Mrs. Townshend indicated that there had been instances where a request for
a conditional use had been granted and the property owners/tenants had violated the conditions of
the conditional use. When the City becomes aware of violations, staff documents them and then
presents them to the Planning Commission for consideration of revoking the conditional use.
Referring to concerns relayed during the Open Forum regarding the potential effect of the proposed
amendment on the Historic District and being aware that the City’s Victorian District, which
encompasses portions of North State Street, is on the National Register of Historic Places, Mr. Slavin
requested clarification regarding the City’s Historic District. Responding, Mrs. Townshend stated
that the City’s Historic District includes properties on State Street to Delaware Avenue; therefore,
the proposed amendments would not affect properties within the City’s Historic District. As a result,
any conditional use application would go only before the Planning Commission for their review and
would not require a review by the Historic District Commission, unless the City were to change the
Historic District boundaries.
The motion to approve the Committee’s recommendation for adoption of Proposed
Ordinance #2014-05 was unanimously carried. (The First Reading of Proposed Ordinance
#2014-05 will take place during the latter part of the meeting.)
Excerpts of City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5
Page 67
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE MEETING OF MARCH 10, 2014 Excerpt from PAGE 3
The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Meeting was held on March 10, 2014,
at 3:31 p.m. with Chairman Dixon presiding Members present were Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Perza, Mr.
Caldwell, and Mrs. Horsey (arrived at 3:33 pm).
Proposed Ordinances Amending Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations
Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that
the proposed ordinances amending Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, were being
presented at the request of Mr. John Paradee, on behalf of his clients, and that the required sponsorship
from members of City Council had been obtained.
#2014-05 Amending Section 2 - General Residence Zones (RG-1 and RG-2), Subsection 2.4 - Conditional
Uses (Sponsors: Bonar, Hutchison, and Lynn)
Mrs. Townshend explained that Proposed Ordinance #2014-05 would amend Section 2 - General
Residence Zones (RG-1 and RG-2), Subsection 2.4 - Conditional Uses by allowing professional offices
as a conditional use within the General Residence Zone on State Street and Governors Avenue between
Water Street and Mary Street, and on Route 8 in its entirety. The proposed ordinance includes provisions
that would protect the character of the residential area and would allow professional offices as a
conditional use, subject to a public hearing and review by the Planning Commission.
Staff recommended adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2014-05.
Responding to Mr. Hutchison, Mrs. Townshend stated that most of the properties along State Street and
Governors Avenue would be subject to the proposed amendment. She noted that the Wesley College
properties are not zoned General Residence. She indicated that the proposed amendment would primarily
affect the older Victorian homes along State and Division Streets; however, it was her estimation that there
was not a large number of such properties.
In response to Mr. Perza regarding feedback from members of the residential communities along State
Street, Governors Avenue, or Route 8 regarding this proposal, Mrs. Townshend stated that Mr. Rhett
Ruggerio, the property owner who requested the proposed amendment, in conjunction with his attorney,
Mr. John Paradee, met and worked very closely with the neighbors of his property (north of Division Street
- Delaware Avenue, Pennsylvania Avenue, Maple Avenue, etc.) to address any concerns they may have
had. Mrs Townsend reminded members that Mr. Ruggerio originally requested a rezoning; however, due
to the large variety of uses allowed in the General Residence and Office (RGO) zone and not allowed in
the General Residence Zone, the residents seemed more comfortable with the conditional use approach
within the residential zone. She noted that owners were having difficulty selling older Victorian homes
along State and Division Streets and that the proposed amendment would assure that the properties are
maintained.
Mrs. Townshend explained that the process would require an application for each property to the Planning
Commission and would provide required public notices and public hearings, etc. She confirmed that there
were parking requirements which would be regulated through the permit process.
Mr. Hutchison moved to recommend adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2014-05, as recommended
by staff, seconded by Mrs. Horsey and unanimously carried.
Page 68
IO RG-1 R-10 ROS R-7
C-3 C-4
M RG-1 R-10 R-7
RG-1 C-4
RG-1 RG-2
RG-1 R-8
RG-1 RG-1
RG-1
Exhibit Map
IO 241
R-8
y
Mar
231 ROS IO
228 229
Proposed Ordinance
C-3
IO RG-1 227 IO
237 RG-1 224
RGO R-8 C-4
#2014-05
RG-1 222
IO 238 235
219
RG-1 236 233 218
R-8
232 230 227 RG-1 216
215
228 212 213
226 223
M RG-3 219 201
224
RG-1 IO RG-1 208
200
220
RG-1 SC-1
RGO C-4
Map 1 of 3
216
RG-1 RG-1
214 IO
RG-1 RG-1 212 129 ROS
e
Stat
IO 127
RG-1 RG-1 RG-1
110
RG-1 RG-1 IO
Downtown Dover Area
107
M IO RG-1
C-1 105 RG-1
sion
Divi
15
IO 9 11
RG-1
IO 5
RG-1 RG-1 RG-1 1 RG-1
RG-1 103 109 R-10 R-10
RGO
RG-1 43
41
RG-1 42 RGO
38 IO
1 R-10
IPM RG-1 34 IO
RG-1 C-1 IO
Ü
32 30 R-8 R-10
28 RGO IO
RG-1 24
22 R-10
RG-1 RG-1 18 16
RG-1 12
R-10
C-3 RG-1 RG-1 RGO RGO R-10
RG-1 C-2
RG-1 C-1A C-1A C-1A RGO ROS
RGO
C-1A C-2
RG-1
RG-1 C-1A 7
RG-2 R-10
C-1A C-1A 8 9
M C-1A C-2
12 15 RGO
sion
16 17 19
Divi
C-1A C-1A 18 20
21 23 RG-1
C-3 C-1A 26
25
28
29 RG-1 R-10 R-10
C-1A 30 32
C-2A
C-3 RG-1 34 33
M 40 41 43 R-10
44 46
Gov 55 IO
C-2A RG-1 48
50 C-2 R-10 R-10
C-2A
RG-1
54
56 erno C-2A C-2A
rs
RG-1 RGO
C-1A C-3 ROS
C-2
C-2 RG-1
844
C-1 C-3 IO
C-2
IO RG-1 C-2
e
Stat
RG-1
838
C-3 RG-1
C-2A C-2 IO
C-2 RGO IO
C-2 C-2
C-2 ROS
R-8 C-2 RG-1
R-8 C-3 C-3 IO
IO
RG-1
R-8 RG-3 IO RG-1
C-2 C-2
RGO ROS
C-2
IO C-2
RG-1 C-2 RG-1
RGO
LEGEND
C-2 RG-1
RG-1 IO RGO
IO RG-1 ROS R-20
RG-1
RG-1 ROS
IO C-2A
IO Zoned RG-1, RG-2
IO RG-1 RG-1
RG-1 IO
Defining Streets
RG-1
RGO ROS
RG-1 C-3 Zoning Districts
RGO
RG-1 C-2A
IO
RG-1 Dover Parcels
C-2A
RG-4 C-2A RG-1 Historic District
er
IO
TND
Wat R-8
ROS RG-1 Corridor Overlay Zone
RGO RG-1
IO RGO R-8 City Limits
C-1A
C-2A 0C-2A 325 650
IO 1,300 1,950 2,600
RG-1
Feet
IO R-8 R-8
MI-14-02
IO R-8
Page 69
R-10 R-10 R-8 R-7 R-7 R-8 R-8 R-20
CPO R-8
RM-2 ROS RG-1 IO IO CPO
R-10 ROS R-8
M R-8 R-8 R-8 R-8
R-10 R-8 CPO RG-3 C-1A R-8
R-10 R-7 R-8 R-8
RC R-10 RG-3
C-2A ROS C-1A R-8 R-8 R-8
RG-3 R-8 R-8 R-8 R-8 R-8
RG-3 R-7 R-7 CPO
ROS R-8
Exhibit Map
ROS C-2A R-8
ROS R-8 R-8 R-8 R-8
RM-1 RM-1 R-10 IO R-8
RG-2
ROS
R-8 IO ROS ROS SC-1 R-8 R-8
Proposed Ordinance
R-8 R-8 R-8
R-8 ROS RG-3
R-8
C-1 R-8
CPO R-8
ROS
#2014-05
IO R-8 R-8
ROS RG-2 R-8 R-8
R-8 R-8 R-10 CPO CPO M
R-10 RM-2 ROS R-8
R-10 R-8 R-8
R-7 RG-1 R-8 R-8 R-8
IO
R-8 RG-1
R-8 R-8 ROS ROS RG-1
R-8 R-8 R-8 ROS
Map 2 of 3
ROS IO
IO R-8 RG-1
C-3
ROS RG-1
R-8 R-8 IPM M
ROS R-8 R-8
R-10 R-8
RM-1 R-8
RM-1 R-8 IO
West of Downtown
RG-3 IO C-3 IO
R-15 RG-3 CPO RG-1
RM-1 R-8 R-8
RM-1 ROS ROS ROS RG-1
RG-2 M
R-8 RG-3
RM-1 RG-3 R-8
ROS RM-1 RG-1 RG-1
R-8 RG-2 C-2A
RG-3 RG-3 RG-1
ROS C-1 RG-1
RG-3 RM-1 M RG-1
RM-1 RG-3 RM-1 C-3 IO
RG-3 RG-3 R-8 RG-2 RG-1
A RG-3 RG-1
RG-1
Ü
R-10 RG-2 RG-3 RM-1 RM-1 C-2A
ROS RG-3 RG-1 RG-1
ROS
R-8 ROS
RG-3 CPO C-3 RG-1RG-1
RG-2 RG-2 RG-1 RG-1
RG-2
R-10 R-8 RG-2 RG-1 RG-1
SC-2 IO RGO M C-1A C-1A
R-10 RG-2 RG-2 RG-3 C-3
R-10 RG-3 RG-5 C-1A C-1A
M C-3
87 ROS RG-2 C-1A C-2A
R-10 RG-2 C-2A
R-20 RG-3 n
DivisioC-1A
R-10 C-2A C-1A C-2A C-2A
RG-3 ROS RM-2 CPO CPO RG-1
R-8
Forrest
RG-3 RG-1
R-20 C-3
RG-3 CPO 934 922
916 902
880 856
CPO 4 5 900 862 844 C-1 C-3
CPO C-2A SC-1 C-3 C-2A C-2A C-2A 1140
RG-1 RG-1 RG-1 C-1A 848 838 IO RG-1
CPO 1148 RG-1 C-3
RG-1 C-2A
C-1A CPO C-2A RG-1
908
R-8 R-8 R-8 RG-1
CPO RG-2 C-2A CPO SC-2 RG-1 RG-1 C-3 C-3
R-8 RG-2 ROS R-8 R-8 RG-3
RG-1 RG-1 IO
RG-2 RG-1
R-8 RG-1 RG-1 RG-1 IO
R-8 IO
RG-2 RG-1
RM-1 RG-1
R-10 ROS
RM-1 RG-1 C-3
RM-1 RG-1
R-8 RG-1
ROS
RM-1 RG-2
RM-2 ROS C-2A
RM-1 RM-1 IPM
RM-1 ROS R-8
RM-1
R-8
RM-1 RM-1
RM-1 RM-1
RM-1 CPO
R-10 RM-1 RM-1
RM-1 ROS RM-1 RM-1 R-8
RM-1 RM-1 IPM
RM-1 RM-1 RM-1
ROS IPM
ROS RM-1 ROS R-8
RM-1 RM-1
RM-1
RM-1
RM-1 ROS
RM-1 RM-1
RM-1
ROS RM-1
RM-1
RM-1
TND
RM-1 RM-1
RM-1 ROS LEGEND
ROS
IPM
C-1A Zoned RG-1, RG-2
RM-1 RM-1
Defining Streets
R-8
ROS Zoning Districts
R-8
R-8 Dover Parcels
R-8
R-8
R-8 Historic District
R-20 R-8 R-8 Corridor Overlay Zone
ROS R-10
R-10
R-10
City Limits
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000R-10
R-10
R-10
Feet R-10
R-10
R-10 R-10
MI-14-02
Page 70
RM-2 RM-2
R-8 RM-2 C-2A
RM-2
R-8 RM-2 R-15 R-15
R-8 RM-2
R-8
R-8 R-8 Exhibit Map
R-8 R-20 Proposed Ordinance
#2014-05
R-8 A
R-8 RG-2
R-20 RM-1
R-10
R-8
R-8
C-1
Map 3 of 3
R-10
RG-2 C-1
R-8 RG-1 RG-2 R-8
C-1 R-7
SC-2 C-PO R-8
RG-3
East of Downtown
ROS
R-7 RG-2
RG-3 R-7 R-20
C-4 R-7 RG-3 A
R-8
R-7 RG-2 R-20
R-7 R-20 R-8
R-8
R-7 R-7 R-8 R-8
RG-1
R-7 R-7 RG-3
Ü
R-7 R-7
R-7 R-8 R-8
R-7 R-8
Little ROS ROS
C-4 R-7 R-7 R-8
RG-1 R-7 Creek
RM-2
R-7
R-7 R-7 R-8
R-7 R-7 RG-2
1542
Little Creek
R-7 R-7 1554
RG-1 1572
1462
R-7 R-7 R-7 R-8 1566
R-7 CPO
si on C-1
R-8
ivi
RG-2 RG-2
C-4
RG-1
R-7 R-7 D
R-8
641 R-8
RG-2 R-8 R-8
C-4
R-8 R-8
SC-1 R-8
R-8 R-8
R-10 SC-2 RM-1
RG-2
R-10
C-4
C-4
R-10 C-4
R-10
MHP
R-10 CPO
R-10 C-4
RG-3
R-10
R-10 RM-1 R-8
LEGEND
SC-2 C-4
R-10
IO RG-3 Zoned RG-1, RG-2
R-8
RG-1 IO C-2A IO RG-3 Defining Streets
C-4 RM-2
C-4 R-8 R-8 Zoning Districts
RG-3
RG-1 R-8 ROS Dover Parcels
IO R-8
IO
R-20 RG-1 C-4 C-4
C-4 C-4 C-1
Accident Potential Zone
RG-1 RG-1 C-1A
RG-1 RG-1 C-4 R-8
C-3 C-3 IPM
65 Noise Zone A
RG-1 R-8 C-3
IO 70 Noise Zone B
RG-1
RG-1
RG-1 RG-3
CPO
C-3 75 Noise Zone C
RG-1 IO
RG-1 M
C-4
R-8 IPM 80 Noise Zone D
RG-1 RM-2
IO SC-3 City Limits
0 600 1,200 2,400 3,600 4,800
RG-1
RG-1
SC-2
R-8 C-3 Feet MI-14-02
Page 71
PETITION TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT
Report to the
Dover Planning Commission
April 21, 2014
Proposed Change: Amendment to Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 – District Regulations,
Section 17 – Shopping Center Development (SC-1, SC-2 and SC-
3), to add a new use to the SC-2 (Community Shopping Center)
zone and add to add a new use to the SC-3 (Regional Shopping
Center) zone.
Summary of Amendment: The proposed amendment was sponsored by members of City
Council in response to constituent requests. There are two pieces
of this amendment:
1. The addition of “light motor vehicle service” as an accessory
use to a permitted use with certain restrictions in the SC-2
Zone.
Properties within the City that are zoned SC-2 include Greentree
Shopping Center, Gateway West, Bay Court Plaza, Edgehill
Shopping Center, Center at Dover (Kohl’s, AC Moore, etc.),
North Dover Shopping Center (Acme, TJ Maxx, etc.), Dover
Mart, Home Depot, former Berry Van Lines property at Leipsic
Road and Route 13, Delaware State University property at
southwest corner of College Road and Route 13, and Carroll’s
Corner.
2. The addition of apartments as part of a mixed use development,
in accordance with specified bulk standards, in the SC-3 Zone.
Properties within the City that are zoned SC-3 include Dover
Mall and Blue Hen Corporate Center.
Comments: At the March 10, 2014 meeting of the Parks, Recreation and
Community Enhancement Committee, the Committee heard public
testimony in opposition to the proposed amendment to the SC-3
Zone. A copy of the Committee meeting minutes is attached, along
with the draft City Council minutes from March 24, 2014 where the
proposed ordinance was discussed on the floor of City Council.
Ordinance Number: 2014-06
File Number: MI-14-03
Page 72
FIRST READING
CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2014-06
1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL
2 MET:
3 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 17 - Shopping Center Development
4 [(SC-1, SC-2 and SC-3)], Subsection 17.32 be amended by adding a new paragraph 6 to read as follows:
5 6. Light motor vehicle service accessory to a permitted use, provided that all work is completed
6 inside a building and that no automobiles are stored outside.
7 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED:
8 That Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 17 - Shopping Center Development
9 [(SC-1, SC-2 and SC-3)], Subsection 17.33 be amended by striking the text indicated in red strikeout and
10 inserting the bold, blue text, as follows:
11 17.33 In a regional shopping center (SC-3), [the following are permitted uses:]
12 1. All retail, office, personal service, recreational and institutional facilities which can be
13 shown, by market analysis, to be needed, and which will have no adverse effect on adjacent
14 land uses.;
15 2. Apartments and multi-family dwellings as part of a mixed-use development, subject to
16 the following requirements:
17 (a) a maximum building height of six (6) stories or 75 feet, whichever is less; and
18 (b) a maximum floor area ratio of 3.0.
19 ADOPTED: *
20 S:\ORDINANCES\2014\DRAFT\Ordinance #2014-06 Amending Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 17 - Shopping Center Development .wpd
21 SYNOPSIS
22 The proposed ordinance would permit apartments and multi-family dwellings as part of a
23 mixed-use development in the regional shopping center (SC-3) zone.
24 (SPONSORS: BONAR, HARE, AND LYNN)
25 Actions History
26 03/24/2014 - Scheduled for First Reading
27 03/10/2014 - Introduced at Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee
Page 73
CITY OF DOVER
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: APRIL 2, 2014
APPLICATION: TEXT AMENDMENT: REVISIONS TO USES SHOPPING
CENTER DEVELOPMENT ZONES
FILE #: MI-14-03
REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric and Public Works Departments
CONTACT PERSON: Aren Wright - Electric
Jason A. Lyon – Public Works
CONTACT PHONE #: ELECTRIC - 302-736-7070 PUBLIC WORKS – 302-736-7025
T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN
A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE .
T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT :
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS
ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER / SANITATION / STREETS / GROUNDS
1. Our office has no objections to the proposed amendments.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES
ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER / SANITATION / STREETS / GROUNDS
1. None
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT
ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER / SANITATION / STREETS / GROUNDS
1. None.
I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE
C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .
Page 74
C F
I I
CITY OF DOVER T R
Y E
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
O M
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY F A
R
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: 04/09/14 D S
O H
V A
E L
R
APPLICATION: Revisions to Uses in Shopping Center Development Zones
FILE #: MI-14-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal
CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Deputy Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY,
AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF
EXPERTISE.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY
THE APPLICANT:
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
Any gas fired HVAC equipment must be equipped with emergency cut off switches remotely
located.
Address numbers of at least 12 inches in height must be placed on the street side of the building
visible from the street. Label all suites
Any natural or LP gas bottles, meters, values, regulators, etc., must have impact protection.
Full building and fire plan review is required.
Building cannot be occupied or construction or renovations started until completion of building
and fire plan review.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
Any change of use will need building and fire plan review and approval
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
Page 75
After any application has been approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant has a
maximum of thirty (30) days to appeal to the Code Board of Appeals Committee.
All comments from this office, approved by the Planning Commission are at the expense of the
owner/applicant.
The City of Dover uses the 2012 NFPA Life Safety Code, 2009 IBC, latest editions of all other
NFPA Codes and the 2012 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations.
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible.
Page 76
CITY OF DOVER D
E
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
L
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D
O
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: April 2, 2014 T
===============================================================
APPLICATION: Text Amendment: Revisions to Uses In Shopping Center Development
Zones
FILE#: MI-14-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT
CONTACT PERSON: Julio F. Seneus PHONE#: 760-2145
===============================================================
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT:
CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1. The department has no comments.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the planning department as soon as possible.
Page 77
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE MEETING OF MARCH 10, 2014 Excerpt from PAGE 3 and 4
The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Meeting was held on March 10, 2014,
at 3:31 p.m. with Chairman Dixon presiding Members present were Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Perza, Mr.
Caldwell, and Mrs. Horsey (arrived at 3:33 pm).
Proposed Ordinances Amending Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations
Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that
the proposed ordinances amending Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, were being
presented at the request of Mr. John Paradee, on behalf of his clients, and that the required sponsorship
from members of City Council had been obtained.
#2014-06 Amending Section 17 - Shopping Center Development (Permitted Uses) (Sponsors: Bonar,
Hare, and Lynn)
Mrs. Townshend explained that Proposed Ordinance #2014-06 amending Section 17 - Shopping Center
Development (Permitted Uses) would allow apartments and multi-family residential uses within mixed use
developments as permitted uses within the SC-3 (Regional Shopping Center) Zone. She explained that
there are two (2) properties in the City with the SC-3 Regional Shopping Zone classification, the Dover
Mall and the Blue Hen Mall, and that the request for the ordinance amendment was submitted on behalf
of the Dover Mall.
Mrs. Townshend advised members that the proposed ordinance also included an amendment to the SC-2
(Community Shopping Center) Zone to allow light automobile maintenance, provided that vehicles not
be stored on the site and that all work take place within an enclosed building. She indicated that this
request was submitted by the owner of the Greentree Shopping Center and that other properties in the City
with an SC-2 zoning classification that would be affected by the amendment include the North Dover
Shopping Center, Value City Shopping Center, Dover Mart Shopping Center, and Metro Shopping Center.
Staff recommended adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2014-06.
Responding to Mr. Perza regarding possible environmental concerns, Mrs. Townshend stated that staff
realizes that some properties are not well managed and to assure such instances are not allowed, the
permitted use would be for light maintenance, entirely within a building (no maintenance done on outside
of building), etc. She explained that the City would have to keep a close watch to assure that no fluids are
being discharged inappropriately. Mrs. Townshend stated that if a business was not being operated
properly, the City would be authorized to close the business and intermediately, the business would be
notified of the violation, then fined, and if compliance was not obtained, the City would issue a provisional
order. If compliance was not met at that time, she stated that the business would then be closed. She
advised members that fines for commercial properties start at $50 and technically, the City can fine up to
$1,000 per day.
In response to Mr. Hutchison, Mrs. Townshend assured members that compatibility issues with the
adjacent properties are considered in reviewing application requests for a permitted use.
Page 78
Mr. Denis McGlynn, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Dover Downs and Dover Motor Sports, advised
members that the Dover Downs property is adjacent to the Dover Mall, where the proposed project would
be located. He met with representatives of the Dover Mall to explain the concerns of Dover Downs, not
with the subdivision or additional expansion of commercial use on the site, but with the addition of
residential properties to the site. He explained that their concern was that the residential properties would
only add enemies to the Speedway and this proposed residential development would be closer to Dover
Downs than other existing residential areas. Allowing such a project would make a lot of residents
unhappy due to the NASCAR races, NASCAR testing done throughout the summer, the Monster Racing
experience that operates 60 days per year, the Firefly Music Festival, etc. He admitted that Dover Downs
and Dover Motor Sports operations create noise and traffic on a regular basis and stated that it was not their
desire to make life more difficult for all. Mr. McGlynn noted that the Comprehensive Plan assigned the
SC-3 zoning classification for the Dover Mall property for a reason and he believed that one (1) of those
reasons was due to the existence of Dover Downs.
Mr. Hutchison moved to recommend against adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2014-06 due to
to encroachment issues with Dover Downs, seconded by Mr. Perza and unanimously carried.
Page 79
EXCERPTS FROM DRAFT MEETING MINTUES OF THE DOVER CITY COUNCIL
MEETING OF MARCH 24, 2014
FROM PAGE 1
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
The Regular Council Meeting was held on March 24, 2014 at 7:30 p.m. with Council
President Bonar presiding. Council members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Perza,
Mr. Slavin, Mrs. Williams, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Lynn was absent.
Council staff members present were Police Chief Hosfelt, Mrs. Mitchell, Mr. Koenig,
Mrs. Townshend, Fire Chief Carey, City Solicitor Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Mayor
Carey was also present.
EXCERPTS FROM PAGE 8 and PAGES 13-15
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT
COMMITTEE REPORT - MARCH 10, 2014
The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee met on
March 10, 2014 with Chairman Dixon presiding.
Proposed Ordinances Amending Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District
Regulations
Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development,
advised members that the proposed ordinances amending Appendix B - Zoning,
Article 3 - District Regulations, were being presented at the request of Mr. John
Paradee, on behalf of his clients, and that the required sponsorship from members of
City Council had been obtained.
#2014-06 Amending Section 17 - Shopping Center Development (Permitted Uses)
(Sponsors: Bonar, Hare, and Lynn)
Mrs. Townshend explained that Proposed Ordinance #2014-06 amending Section 17
- Shopping Center Development (Permitted Uses) would allow apartments and
multi-family residential uses within mixed use developments as permitted uses
within the SC-3 (Regional Shopping Center) Zone. She explained that there are two
(2) properties in the City with the SC-3 Regional Shopping Zone classification, the
Dover Mall and the Blue Hen Mall, and that the request for the ordinance amendment
was submitted on behalf of the Dover Mall.
Mrs. Townshend advised members that the proposed ordinance also included an
amendment to the SC-2 (Community Shopping Center) Zone to allow light
automobile maintenance, provided that vehicles not be stored on the site and that all
work take place within an enclosed building. She indicated that this request was
Page 80
submitted by the owner of the Greentree Shopping Center and that other properties
in the City with an SC-2 zoning classification that would be affected by the
amendment include the North Dover Shopping Center, Value City Shopping Center,
Dover Mart Shopping Center, and Metro Shopping Center.
Staff recommended adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2014-06.
Responding to Mr. Perza regarding possible environmental concerns,
Mrs. Townshend stated that staff realizes that some properties are not well managed
and to assure such instances are not allowed, the permitted use would be for light
maintenance, entirely within a building (no maintenance done on outside of
building), etc. She explained that the City would have to keep a close watch to
assure that no fluids are being discharged inappropriately. Mrs. Townshend stated
that if a business was not being operated properly, the City would be authorized to
close the business and intermediately, the business would be notified of the violation,
then fined, and if compliance was not obtained, the City would issue a provisional
order. If compliance was not met at that time, she stated that the business would then
be closed. She advised members that fines for commercial properties start at $50 and
technically, the City can fine up to $1,000 per day.
In response to Mr. Hutchison, Mrs. Townshend assured members that compatibility
issues with the adjacent properties are considered in reviewing application requests
for a permitted use.
Mr. Denis McGlynn, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Dover Downs and Dover
Motor Sports, advised members that the Dover Downs property is adjacent to the
Dover Mall, where the proposed project would be located. He met with
representatives of the Dover Mall to explain the concerns of Dover Downs, not with
the subdivision or additional expansion of commercial use on the site, but with
the addition of residential properties to the site. He explained that their concern was
that the residential properties would only add enemies to the Speedway and this
proposed residential development would be closer to Dover Downs than
other existing residential areas. Allowing such a project would make a lot of
residents unhappy due to the NASCAR races, NASCAR testing done throughout
the summer, the Monster Racing experience that operates 60 days per year, the
Firefly Music Festival, etc. He admitted that Dover Downs and Dover Motor
Sports operations create noise and traffic on a regular basis and stated that it
was not their desire to make life more difficult for all. Mr. McGlynn noted that
the Comprehensive Plan assigned the SC-3 zoning classification for the Dover
Mall property for a reason and he believed that one (1) of those reasons was due
to the existence of Dover Downs.
The Committee recommended denial of Proposed Ordinance #2014-06 due to
encroachment issues with Dover Downs.
Page 81
During the Council Meeting, at the request of Chairman Dixon, Mrs. Townshend briefed members
on the proposed ordinance and Committee’s recommendation. She explained that there were
two (2) issues to be considered, as follows: 1) amendments to the Shopping Center Zoning
Classification (SC-3) which would allow apartments and multi-family dwellings if made a part of
a mixed use development and assigned some of the bulk standards relative to the height of the
buildings, which did not receive favorable recommendation by the Committee due to the testimony
shared during the Committee meeting; and 2) amendments to the Shopping Center Zoning
Classifications (SC-1, SC-2, and SC-3) which would allow for light motor vehicle service accessory
to a permitted use.
Mrs. Townshend referred to a letter, dated March 24, 2014, submitted by Mr. Barry Anstine,
Managing Member of the JBP Greentree Properties, LLC, developers and owners of the Greentree
Village Center (Exhibit #2), noting that Proposed Ordinance #2014-06 included amendments to the
SC-3 Zone regarding apartments and multi-family dwellings that may not have the support for
further consideration. Rather than not taking further action on the entire ordinance, she stated that
Mr. Anstine requested that the City move forward with considering Proposed Ordinance #2014-06
and striking any uses in the SC-3 Zone that members did not wish to pursue at this time. As
indicated in Mr. Anstine’s letter, she explained that the Greentree Village Center had been in
discussions with Mid-Atlantic AAA regarding the possibility of developing a Car Care Center in the
vacant building previously occupied by Blockbuster. The AAA Car Care Center would offer
automotive services, such as tire, battery, and wiper blade replacements, with the anticipation that
car owners would wait while services are completed.
In response to Mr. Slavin, Mrs. Townshend indicated that without an amendment, the owners of the
Greentree Village Center would not be permitted to request a conditional use for the property.
Mr. Hutchison stated that since he is a Board Member of AAA, he would abstain from voting on the
issue.
Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mrs. Townshend explained that building renovations to the former
Blockbuster building would be required to accommodate the desires of the owners of the Greentree
Village Center to establish a AAA Car Care Center. She assured members that the owners would
be required to submit building plans that would require fire code, building code, and zoning review
by the City. Although the proposed amendment would not automatically allow such a business, it
would provide the opportunity to establish such a business as a conditional use.
Mr. Hare felt that an amendment to the SC-2 Zoning Classification could possibly cultivate the
establishment of businesses in the City of Dover. He concurred with the concerns relative to the
proposed amendments to the SC-3 Zoning Classification that would allow apartments and multi-
family dwellings and questioned why there would be an interest in residing in such close
proximity to either the Dover Mall or Dover Downs.
In response to Mr. Hare, Mrs. Townshend clarified that the elimination of the proposed amendments
to the SC-3 Zoning Classification that would allow apartments and multi-family dwellings would
require striking Lines #7-18 of the proposed ordinance. If the amendment were approved, the First
Excerpts of City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4
Page 82
Reading and referral of the proposed ordinance, scheduled for the latter part of the meeting
(Agenda Item #10B), would include the proposed ordinance as amended (striking Lines #7-18).
Mr. Slavin moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation for denial of
Proposed Ordinance #2014-06 due to encroachment issues with Dover Downs, seconded by
Mrs. Williams.
Mr. Anderson felt that the proposed ordinance could add value to the City and that making certain
amendments could alleviate some legitimate concerns. He suggested that members approve the
proposed ordinance, with amendments, to be referred and allow for its consideration and public
input. It was his feeling that the City too often shackles businesses and that denying the
consideration of the proposed amendment would deny more jobs and people’s rights to use their
property. He suggested stipulating that such use would not adversely affect adjacent property
owners.
Responding to Mr. Perza, Mrs. Townshend explained that if the Committee’s recommendation were
approved, the proposed ordinance would not move forward for a First Reading and referral (in
essence, Agenda Item #10-B would automatically be eliminated for consideration). In order for a
First Reading and further consideration and public testimony of Proposed Ordinance #2014-06,
members of City Council would need to vote in opposition to the motion to approve the Committee’s
recommendation.
The motion for approval of the Committee’s recommendation unanimously failed. (The First
Reading of Proposed Ordinance #2014-06 will take place during the latter part of the meeting.)
Excerpts of City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4
Page 83
City of Dover
DATA SHEET FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OF April 9, 2014
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF April 21, 2014
Plan Title: Tower Commons (Water Tower Place)
S-14-03
Plan Type: Site Plan
Property Location: Northwest corner of North DuPont Highway (U.S. 13) and East
Division Street (Delaware Route 8) and bounded by Kings
Highway and Maple Parkway
Property Address: 50 North DuPont Highway
Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.06-01-02.00-000
Owner: Playtex Manufacturing Inc.
Equitable Owner: TC Holdings LLC
Project Engineer: Karins and Associates
Building Area: Proposed 35,850 SF
Existing Use: Vacant Industrial Buildings
Proposed Use: Two Restaurant Buildings, One Retail/Restaurant Building, and One
Retail Building
Off Street Parking: Proposed: 234 spaces
Required: 189 minimum and 237 maximum
Sewer & Water: City of Dover
Zoning Classification: SC-1 (Neighborhood Shopping Center Zone)
SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) – portion of site
Waiver Requested: Requirement to Reduce Impervious Area (Floodplain
Requirement)
Partial Elimination of Sidewalk
Reduction in Arterial Street Buffer
P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903
Community Excellence Through Quality Service
Page 84
S-14-03 Tower Commons at 50 N. DuPont Highway - REVISED
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 2
C P
I L
T A
Y N
N
CITY OF DOVER O I
F N
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE G
D
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY O
V
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: April 9, 2014 E
R
APPLICATION: Water Tower Place (Formerly Tower Commons) at 50 N. DuPont Highway__
FILE #: S-14-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Planning
CONTACT PERSON: Ann Marie Townshend, AICP PHONE #: (302) 736-7196
PLAN SUMMARY:
This Site Plan would provide for redevelopment of the former Playtex Manufacturing site at the
northwest corner of North DuPont Highway and East Division Street. The subject property is
zoned SC-1 (Neighborhood Shopping Center Zone), with a portion of the site along the western
edge within the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) – Tier 1 Secondary Wellhead
Protection Area. The owner of record is Playtex Manufacturing Inc. The property address is 50
North DuPont Highway. Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.06-01-02.00-000.
The proposed site renovations include the demolition of one of the two existing industrial
buildings and the construction of four buildings as follows:
Building 1 – Restaurant (1 story) 6,400 SF
Building 2 – Retail/Restaurant (2 story) 9,600 SF
Building 3 – Restaurant (1 story) 5,030 SF
Building 4 – Retail (1 story) 14,820 SF
The proposed access for the site includes a total of four (4) access points. These include one full
access location off of Maple Parkway, one right in/right out from North DuPont Highway, and
two access points from East Division Street (one right in and one full access).
Parking Summary
The minimum parking requirement for the SC-1 (Neighborhood Shopping Center Zone) is one
Page 85
S-14-03 Tower Commons at 50 N. DuPont Highway - REVISED
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 3
(1) parking space for every three hundred square feet of gross leasable area for the retail
buildings, and one space for every four table seats and one space for every three bar seats for the
restaurants. Based on the proposed retail floor area of 19,620 square feet and the seat count
provided for the restaurants, a total of 189 parking spaces are required. This includes 66 spaces
for the retail uses and 123 spaces for the restaurant uses. The proposed Site Plan includes 234
spaces, which is less than the 237 maximum allowable spaces. Thirteen handicap accessible
spaces are provided.
Bicycle Parking
The minimum bicycle parking is one (1) bike space for every twenty (20) parking spaces
provided. Based on the number of 234 proposed parking spaces, twelve (12) bicycle parking
spaces are required. The proposed plan shows 20 bicycle parking spaces, with bicycle racks
located near each proposed building.
Architecture
No architecture has been provided for review as required by Zoning Ordinance, Article 5, §19.
SITE CONSIDERATIONS
Source Water Protection Overlay Zone Requirements
The property is located partially within the SWPOZ – Tier 1 (Secondary Wellhead Protection
Area). The following uses are prohibited within the area of the site that is within the SWPOZ:
29.51 Uses prohibited:
a) Automobile body/repair shop, motor vehicle, boat or farm equipment service;
b) Gas stations and motor vehicle service stations;
c) Fleet/trucking/bus terminal;
d) Dry cleaner;
e) Electrical/electronic manufacturing facility;
f) Machine shop;
g) Metal plating/finishing/fabricating facility;
h) Chemical processing/storage facility;
i) Wood preserving/treating facility;
j) Junk yard/scrap yard/salvage yard;
k) Mines/gravel pit;
l) Land divisions resulting in high density (> one unit/acre) septic systems;
m) Equipment maintenance/fueling areas;
n) Injection wells/dry wells/sumps, except for single-family residences directing
gutter downspouts to a drywell;
o) Underground storage tanks;
p) All uses not permitted in the underlying zone district.
The SWPOZ Tier 1 is subject to the following:
29.92 Open space. Areas within 50 feet of the well shall be 100 percent open space.
Page 86
S-14-03 Tower Commons at 50 N. DuPont Highway - REVISED
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 4
29.93 [Hazardous materials restrictions.] New development within 75 feet of the well
must demonstrate that the new development will not produce, store, transfer or
otherwise handle hazardous materials.
29.94 [Runoff.] The natural runoff flowing into wellhead areas shall be allowed and all
new stormwater runoff shall be diverted around the wellhead protection areas wherever
practical.
Waiver Requested: Flood Hazard Area
A portion of the site is within the Flood Hazard Area (100 year flood plain) as identified on the
FIRM Panel of Kent County Delaware Map Number 10001C0167H, dated May 5, 2003. In
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 §11.21, redevelopment of the site must include
a 15 percent reduction in the amount of impervious from predevelopment conditions. Because
less than 33 percent of the site is within the Flood Hazard Area, the Planning Commission may
waive or reduce the amount of impervious cover reduction required. A waiver request has been
submitted.
Dumpster
The proposed shopping center will be served by private trash collection. For the restaurant uses,
two (2) dumpster pads are required for the first 3,000 square feet, and one (1) additional
dumpster pad is required for each additional 3,000 square feet or fraction thereof. Based on this
calculation, three (3) dumpster pads are required for the smaller restaurant in Building 3, four (4)
dumpster pads are required for the larger restaurant in Building 1, and three (3) dumpster pads
are required for the mixed retail/restaurant in Building 2. For the remainder of the shopping
center, two (2) dumpster pads are required for the first two tenants and one for each additional
tenant thereafter. Therefore a total of twelve (12) dumpster pads are required for the site. The
minimum size of a dumpster pad is 12’x12’. The minimum size of the dumpster enclosures is
10’x10’. The Site Plan shows two dumpster pads on the site, behind Building 2 and Building 3.
Each measures approximately 10’x20’. Building 1 and Building 4 appear to have trash
compactors proposed. If the dumpster requirements exceed what is needed on the site, areas can
be shown as reserved for future use. The City Planner may require the owner of record to
construct the dumpster pad and enclosure on the area shown as reserved if the dumpsters are
needed in the future.
Loading Space
Zoning Ordinance, Article 6 §4.23 requires loading spaces to be installed for retail and service
buildings at a rate of one space per 8,000 SF to 25,000 SF and one for each additional 25,000 SF.
Based on the square footage of Building 1 and Building 3, no loading spaces are required;
however, one (1) loading space is required for Building 2 and Building 4. The proposed plan
shows loading spaces at the rear of each building.
Waiver Requested: Sidewalks
Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 §18 requires sidewalks to be installed along the public street frontage
of a property. Sidewalk currently exists along East Division Street. The proposed plan shows
sidewalks along the frontage of the site on East Division Street, North DuPont Highway, and a
portion of Maple Parkway. Sidewalk is not shown along the Kings Highway frontage or the
westernmost portion of the Maple Parkway frontage of the property. These are the portions of the
Page 87
S-14-03 Tower Commons at 50 N. DuPont Highway - REVISED
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 5
site identified as Phase 2. Unless a waiver is granted by the Planning Commission, sidewalk must
be constructed along these frontages during the initial development. A sidewalk waiver request for
installation of this sidewalk has been submitted.
The Zoning Ordinance also requires that sidewalks be provided into the site. The Plan as proposed
shows sidewalk access into the site at all vehicle access points at several other locations on the site.
The Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 § 17.6 requires that pedestrian traffic be separated from vehicle
traffic by means of appropriate site design and traffic control devices.
Internal Circulation
The site includes drive aisles around each of the buildings and a drive aisle that goes through the site
in a north/south direction connecting East Division Street and Maple Parkway. The drive aisle
coming off North DuPont Highway terminates at this drive aisle. The primary drive aisles have been
designed to avoid conflicts between through traffic and cars backing out of parking spaces.
Curbing
Article 6 § 3.6 (b) requires curbing for all parking areas. The plan provides curbing around the
building drive aisles and the parking areas. There are no areas shown on the plan without curbing.
Lighting
The location of lighting is not indicated on the plan. Lighting shall be provided at 1 ½
footcandles at grade. The lighting should be deflected away from residential properties and shall
not be distracting to traffic on adjacent roads. The design/style of the fixtures should be
provided on the Site Detail Plan sheet.
Landscaping and Tree Planting
One (1) tree is required for every 3,000 SF of non-woodland lot area. Based on the Tree Density
Worksheet on the Checklist for Site Plan Applications, the site includes 9.3 acres or 405,108SF
of lot area (no woodland area). Based on this, 136 trees are required on the site. The Landscape
Plan shows 141 trees. All trees shall be located ten (10) feet from utilities.
The site also requires a 30-foot Arterial Street Buffer along North DuPont Highway and a 10-
foot landscaped buffer along all lot lines. A minimum of ten percent of the lot area shall include
landscaping, pedestrian malls and courtyards; and parking areas shall be landscaped.
The Zoning Ordinance, Article 5, §7.23 requires that when a parking lot is located across the
street from a residential zoning district:
it shall be screened from view of such land by a thick hedge located along a line
drawn parallel to the street and a distance of 20 feet therefrom, such hedge to be
interrupted only at points of ingress and egress. The open area between such
hedge and the street shall be landscaped in harmony with the landscaping
prevailing on neighboring properties fronting on the same street. A fence five feet
high may be required while such hedge is growing to a suitable thickness.
Page 88
S-14-03 Tower Commons at 50 N. DuPont Highway - REVISED
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 6
There are residential uses located across the street on the south side of East Division Street;
therefore this thick hedge is required between the parking lot and East Division Street. The
Landscape Plan shows a thick hedge in this area to be planted with Foster Holly and Hicks Yew.
Waiver Requested: Arterial Street Buffer
North DuPont Highway (U.S Route 13) is considered as a principal arterial and requires a thirty (30)
foot landscape buffer along the road frontage known as an Arterial Street Buffer. The buffer is
measured from the edge of the right-of-way. This plan does not provide the required thirty (30) foot
landscape buffer along DuPont Highway. The plan provides twenty (20) feet of landscape buffer
along DuPont Highway. The Arterial Street Buffer is required to be planted in a variety of trees,
shrubs and ground cover. Planting of the Arterial Street Buffer is required to be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission. A written waiver request for the reduction in the width of
the Arterial Street Buffer has been submitted to the Planning Office for consideration by the
Planning Commission.
The SC-1 (Neighborhood Shopping Center Zone) requires a ten (10) foot landscape area to be
located along all lot lines.
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN
CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S
AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE.
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1) The Arterial Street Buffer shall be provided in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance unless
a waiver is granted by the Planning Commission. A written waiver request for a reduction of
the Arterial Street Buffer width to twenty (20) feet has been submitted to the Planning Office
for consideration by the Planning Commission.
2) Building architectural elevations must be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission. These may be reviewed as old business once architectural elevations are
available.
3) Provide or revise the following information in the Data Column on the Title Sheet:
a) The Plan will need to be updated to reflect any changes recommended or approvals or
waivers granted by the Planning Commission.
b) In Note 6 the existing zoning should reflect the SWPOZ, as a portion of the site is
subject to this zone.
c) Include the percent of the site that will be comprised of landscaping.
d) Include the percentage and acreage of the site that is located within the Flood Hazard
Area.
e) Revise the number of dumpster pads and enclosures required to twelve (12),
including the detail of the calculation as provided in the DAC report. Show areas
reserved for future dumpster locations on the plan, and provide a note that any
reserved dumpster areas shall be constructed if determined to be necessary by the
Page 89
S-14-03 Tower Commons at 50 N. DuPont Highway - REVISED
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 7
Planning Director.
f) Changes to plan drawings may require additional corrections and/or additions to the
Data Column.
4) A sidewalk is required along all street frontages. As submitted, the Site Plan does not show
sidewalk along a portion of the Maple Parkway frontage and the Kings Highway frontage. A
waiver request has been submitted to the Planning Commission to waive the requirement that
these sidewalks be constructed with the proposed improvements.
5) Please provide the name and address of the owner of record of the adjoining property, as well
as the zoning of this property.
6) Show locations for twelve (12) dumpster pads at 12’x12’ each. Also, please note that State
regulations require recycling for commercial trash pick-up. All dumpsters are required to be
within an enclosure. Please ensure that the site accommodates both trash and recycling pick-
up in accordance with City and State requirements.
7) As it relates to the Flood Hazard Area requirements in the Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 §
11.211, a 15% reduction of impervious cover on the entire site is required. Because less than
33% of the site is within the Flood Hazard Area, the applicant may request that the Planning
Commission waive this requirement. Note 17 states that a 15 percent reduction of impervious
cover within the Flood Hazard Area is achieved through the proposed Site Plan. If a 15
percent reduction is not achieved on the entire site, then a waiver is necessary. A waiver
request has been submitted for consideration by the Planning Commission.
8) Any proposed construction within the Flood Hazard Area is subject to the requirements of
Chapter 50 of the Dover Code of Ordinances.
9) On the Site Development Plan sheet please add the boundary of the Source Water Protection
Overlay Zone on the lot.
10) Provide construction details for the following but not limited to: lighting, crosswalks,
dumpster pad and enclosure, paving, bicycle racks, curbing, traffic control signage, etc.
11) The site is being reviewed through the State of Delaware Brownfield Program. Please
provide documentation to the Planning Office of any documentation with regard to
environmental contamination and/or clean-up related to the site.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
1) Recommendation on Waiver Request:
a. Reduction of Impervious Cover on Floodplain Impacted Site: Staff recommends
approval of this waiver. The proposed plan shows a reduction of impervious cover
Page 90
S-14-03 Tower Commons at 50 N. DuPont Highway - REVISED
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 8
within the floodplain portion of the site, but does not achieve a 15% reduction of
impervious cover on the entire site. Only 5% of the site is within the floodplain,
and conditions in this portion of the site will be improved.
b. Elimination of Requirement to Install Frontage Sidewalk along Areas of the Site
Identified as “Phase 2”:
i. Kings Highway: Staff recommends approval of this waiver and
acknowledges that the issues with grade changes cause difficulty with
construction of a sidewalk along the Kings Highway frontage. Such a
sidewalk would need to be constructed at the time that Phase 2 is
developed. If DelDOT requires that the frontage sidewalk be constructed,
then the applicant must comply with this requirement.
ii. Maple Parkway: Staff recommends denial of this waiver, as this is an
important component of infrastructure, and there are no technical issues
that would prevent the sidewalk from being constructed.
c. Reduction of Arterial Street Buffer: Staff recommends approval of the reduction
of the Arterial Street Buffer to twenty (20) feet. The buffer provided will include
the required landscaping. The addition of deceleration lanes creates a condition
that justifies the reduction.
2) Staff notes that this location is a gateway from DuPont Highway to the downtown and
recommends that the architecture of the buildings on the site incorporate architectural
elements consistent with the location of a downtown gateway through incorporation of
brick and other materials and features characteristic of the area.
3) Staff recommends crosswalks be provided to allow for crossing from the sidewalk on the
west side of the north/south drive aisle to the building locations.
4) Staff recommends that where sidewalks enter the site and cross a drive aisle, crosswalks
be provided and the sidewalks line up on either side of the drive aisle. There are several
locations on the site, where the sidewalks are offset as they cross drive aisles.
5) Staff recommends that a safe pedestrian path be provided from the north/south drive aisle
to Building 3 and Building 4.
6) Staff recommends that any outside HVAC equipment be designed to minimize the impact
on adjacent property owners, adequately screened from public view and the overall
visible impact on the streetscape. The locations should be depicted on the plan.
7) Staff would recommend the applicant consider a Unified Comprehensive Sign Plan to
address signage on the site. The site qualifies for a Unified Comprehensive Sign Plan as
there are four buildings under common ownership located on one parcel.
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
1) The submitted Site Plan proposes retaining one of the two buildings and the surrounding
Page 91
S-14-03 Tower Commons at 50 N. DuPont Highway - REVISED
DAC Report – April 9, 2014
Page 9
area for future development. Development of this area will be subject review by the
Planning Commission under a separate application.
2) In the event, that major changes and revisions to the Site Plan occur in the finalization of
the Site Plan contact the Planning Office. Examples include reorientation of building
additions, and relocation of site components like dumpster pads, utilities, changes in
building size, etc. These changes may require resubmittal for review by the Development
Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, or other agencies and commissions making
recommendations in regards to the plan.
3) Other agencies and departments which participate in the Development Advisory
Committee may provide additional comments related to their areas of expertise and code
requirements.
4) Following Planning Commission approval of the Site Plan, the Plan must be revised to
meet all conditions of approval from the Development Advisory Committee or as
otherwise noted. A Check Print must be submitted for review by Planning Office Staff.
Upon determination that the Plan is complete and all agency approvals have been
received, copies of the Plan may be submitted for final endorsement.
5) The applicant/developer shall be aware that prior to any ground disturbing activities on
the site the appropriate site inspections, pre-construction, and permits are required.
6) Construction may have an effect on the adjacent property owners and nearby travel lanes.
Any work requiring the closing or rerouting of travelers to adjacent properties should be
coordinated as to offer the least amount of inconvenience to the adjacent property
owners.
7) The applicant shall be aware that Site Plan approval does not represent a Sign Permit, nor
does it convey permission to place any sign on the premises. Any proposed site or
building identification sign shall require a Sign Permit from the City of Dover prior to
placement of any such sign.
8) The applicant shall be aware that Site Plan approval does not represent a Building Permit
and associated construction activity permits. A separate application process is required
for issuance of a Building Permit from the City of Dover.
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible.
Page 92
CITY OF DOVER
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: APRIL 2, 2014
APPLICATION: Watertower Place, 50 N. DuPont Hwy.
FILE #: S-14-03 REVISED
REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric and Public Works Departments
CONTACT PERSON: Steve Enss - Electric
Jason A. Lyon, P.E. – Public Works
CONTACT PHONE #: Electric - 302-736-7070 Public Works – 302-736-7025
T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN
A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE .
T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT :
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS
ELECTRIC
1. The roadway and curbing must be in.
2. The right-of-way must be within 6" of final grade.
3. The property corners must be staked.
4. Owner is responsible for locating all water, sewer, and storm sewer lines.
5. Owner is responsible for installing all conduits and equipment pads per the City of Dover Engineering Department
specifications.
6. Owner is responsible for site and/or street lighting.
7. Meter locations will be determined by City of Dover Engineering Department.
8. Load sheets and AutoCAD compatible DXF or DWG diskettes of site plans, including driveways, are required prior to
receiving approved electrical construction drawings.
9. Any relocation of existing electrical equipment will be engineered by the City of Dover Electric Department. Developer
may be required to perform a quantity of the relocation. Any work performed by the City of Dover will be at the
owner’s expense.
10. Prior to construction, owner is responsible for granting an easement to the City of Dover Electric
Department. Easement forms will be furnished and prepared by the City of Dover Electric Engineering Department.
11. Fees will be assessed upon final site plans. The owner will be responsible for fees assessed prior to
construction. Owner is required to sign off plans prepared by the Electric Department.
12. Must maintain 10' clearance around all electrical equipment, unless pre-approved by the City of Dover Electric
Engineering Department.
13. Prior to the completion of any/all designs and estimates, the owner is responsible for providing the Electric
Engineering Department with a physical address of the property.
14. All Engineering and design for Dover Electric will be engineered upon final approved plans. All Engineering work will
be furnished by the City’s Electric Engineering Department.
Page 93
Tower Commons
File #: S-14-03
January 2, 2014
Page 2 of 4
WATER
1. All water utility components must meet the requirements of the Water Wastewater Handbook, effective date March 22,
2010. Please contact our office for more information.
2. The size, type, and location of all proposed and existing water lines and valves must be shown on the plan. Please
note that the water service located within the property will be owned, maintained and operated by the owner.
3. Water usage projections (peak demand or plumbing fixtures) must be submitted to our office to correctly determine
the size of the domestic and irrigation (if applicable) water meter for the proposed building. These projections must be
submitted prior to approval so the meter size can be placed on the final site plan. The proposed water meter must be
installed in a pit per City of Dover requirements and manufacturer’s recommendations. All water meters shall be
installed outside, in a meter pit or vault, on the domestic water service, in a non-traffic bearing location (which includes
vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic). Also, a dual check valve is required downstream of the meter.
4. Each water service line from the main to a property or principle structure shall be metered by a single water meter so
as to control the entire domestic supply.
5. The domestic service, fire main connection and valves must be clearly shown for each building. A valve must be
installed at the tee to isolate combined fire and domestic water service to the building from the water loop. Typically
this valve is installed at the tee or an acceptable distance from the building. A valve must be provided on the
domestic water service, which must be tapped off of the combined eight-inch (8”) fire/domestic service outside of the
building. The domestic water tap and valve should be as close to the building as possible. Typically, the domestic tap
and valve are located within five feet (5’) to ten feet (10’) of the building. A blow up detail of this layout is
recommended.
6. Provide a construction detail for the proposed restraining system for the fire main located within the buildings. The
Department of Public Works will test and inspect all fire mains to a blind flange located inside the buildings. The blind
flange with tap is used for hydrostatic pressure testing (200 psi for two (2) hours) and dechlorination. The flange must
be restrained in the direction of the pipe entering the facility. A pipe entering horizontally through a wall sleeve shall
be restrained with rods through the wall. A pipe entering vertically through a slab shall be restrained through the floor
to the ninety degree (90) bend and thrust block. All rods shall be a minimum of ¾” all thread. All pipes through walls
and slabs must be Class 52 cement lined ductile iron pipe. Confirm particulars to meet this requirement with
mechanical designer.
WASTEWATER
1. All wastewater utility components must meet the requirements of the Water Wastewater Handbook, effective date
March 22, 2010. Please contact our office for more information.
2. The size, length, slope, type and flow directions must be shown on all existing and proposed sanitary sewer lines.
Rim and invert elevations must be labeled on all sanitary structures.
3. Cleanouts must be installed on sanitary sewer laterals within five feet (5’) of the building, one foot (1’) outside of the
right-of-way and at all bends. Any cleanout located within a traffic bearing location shall be installed with a heavy duty
cast iron frame and cover to prevent damage to the cleanout and lateral.
4. Sizing (flow) calculations must be submitted for all sanitary sewer mains showing that velocity and all other
requirements are met. Any projected future flow requirement must be clearly identified. Please note that the sanitary
sewer service located within the property will be owned, maintained and operated by the owner.
5. Sizing (flow) calculations must be submitted for all sanitary sewer laterals (other than for single-family dwellings)
showing that velocity and all other requirements are met.
6. The minimum size of all sanitary sewer laterals shall be six-inch (6”).
7. If kitchen facilities are proposed a minimum 1,000 gallon, two chamber grease trap, meeting all Kent County
ordinance requirements, must be provided. A construction detail for the proposed grease trap, as well as the
proposed location, must be provided on the plan.
Page 94
Tower Commons
File #: S-14-03
January 2, 2014
Page 3 of 4
STORMWATER
1. Final site plan approval will not be granted until a copy of the approved Stormwater/Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan from Kent Conservation District is submitted to our office.
2. The size, length, slope, type and flow directions must be shown on all existing and proposed storm sewer lines. Rim
and invert elevations must be labeled on all stormwater structures.
STREETS
1. Final site plan approval will not be granted until a copy of the approved entrance plan, signed by DelDOT is submitted
to our office.
2. The current City of Dover standard street section provides for a 3’ grass strip between the curb and sidewalk. This
standard was administratively revised to meet ADA and FHA compliance with cross slope requirements and to
prevent cars from scrapping at driveways. The revised standard utilizes a five feet (5’) wide public sidewalk with a five
feet (5’) wide grass strip behind the curb. Install sidewalk along the Maple Parkway and Kings Highway NE where this
property has road frontage.
SANITATION / GROUNDS
1. None.
GENERAL
1. All existing utilities shall be adjusted to final grade in accordance with current City of Dover requirements and
practices. This must be included as a note on the plan.
2. The final site plan must be submitted in the following compatible digital formats:
a. AutoCAD 2004 (.dwg format).
b. Adobe Reader (.pdf format).
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES
ELECTRIC
1. Owner must give the City of Dover Electric Department three (3) months notice prior to construction. Owner is
responsible for following the requirements outlined in the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. The handbook is
now available on the website at the following link: http://www.cityofdover.com/departments/electric/documents/.
WATER
1. The current water allocation that is associated to this site shall be transferred to the City of Dover.
2. Please locate all wells that are located on the property, depict on plan set.
STREETS
1. The entirety of Maple Parkway shall be milled and overlaid to the City of Dover standard, depth of the mill and overlay
will be determined by the submission of core samples, to be provided by the owner / developer.
WASTEWATER / STORMWATER / SANITATION / GROUNDS / GENERAL
1. None.
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT
ELECTRIC
1. None.
Page 95
Tower Commons
File #: S-14-03
January 2, 2014
Page 4 of 4
WATER
1. The City of Dover water system is available to this site. The developer is responsible for all costs associated with
extending and providing service to the proposed development.
2. Prior to plan approval, the water system plans must be submitted to the Division of Public Health, Office of Drinking
Water for review and approval. The owner/developer will be responsible for providing all completed forms and plan
sets to the City of Dover as required for submission to the Office of Drinking Water. Plans will not be submitted to the
Office of Drinking Water until review has been completed by our office.
3. Hydrant flow testing is currently only performed during the spring and fall. The applicant must call the Department of
Public Works directly to schedule these tests. This applies to both existing hydrants as well as those proposed for the
site.
WASTEWATER
1. The City of Dover sanitary sewer system is available to this site. The developer is responsible for all costs associated
with extending and providing service and capacity to the proposed development.
2. Prior to plan approval, the sanitary sewer system plans must be submitted to the DNREC, Division of Water
Resources, Surface Water Discharges Section for review and approval. The owner/developer is responsible for
providing all application fees, completed forms and plan sets directly to DNREC.
3. Profiles of the sanitary sewer main must be provided with the construction plans. All water, sanitary sewer and storm
sewer crossings must be shown on the profiles.
STREETS
1. Further analysis must be submitted with regards to the entrance on Maple Parkway. The analysis should provide data
that justifies the proposed parking orientation with relation to safe entering and exiting of the proposed site.
2. One of the entrances on East Division Street should be eliminated.
STORMWATER / SANITATION / GROUNDS
1. None.
GENERAL
1. The applicant is advised that depending upon the size of the existing water service and sanitary sewer lateral to be
abandoned, flowable fill may be required.
2. Construction plans will not be reviewed by our office unless all previous comments have been clearly addressed
within the plan set and accordingly identified within an itemized response letter and with the Water/Wastewater Initial
Plan Submission Checklist, which can be obtained from the following website: https://imageserv9.team-
logic.com/mediaLibrary/198/WaterWastewaterHandbookFinal_1.pdf, page 88.
I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE
C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .
Page 96
C F
I I
CITY OF DOVER T R
Y E
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
O M
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY F A
R
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: 04/09/14 D S
O H
V A
E L
R
APPLICATION: 50 N. DuPont Hwy - Watertower Place (Plans of 3/14/14)
FILE #: S-14-03 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal
CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Deputy Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY,
AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF
EXPERTISE.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY
THE APPLICANT:
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
Proposed building is two restaurants, a combination restaurant/retail, and a drug store. Primary
fire lanes are required to be 24 feet wide and cover the side of the building that has the primary
entrance and exit. Secondary fire lanes can be reduced to 16 feet wide. Both can be no closer
than 10 feet to the building and no farther than 50 feet from the building. Fire lanes shall cover
the proposed building as discussed in the consultation meeting with the Fire Marshal. This must
be clearly shown on the plans.
Firefighter perimeter access will be clearly shown on the plans as discussed in the consultation
meeting with the Fire Marshal. Need to further discuss building 2 since it has changed since the
consultation.
Any gas fired HVAC equipment must be equipped with emergency cut off switches remotely
located.
Address numbers of at least 12 inches in height must be placed on the street side of the building
visible from the street. Label all suites
Any natural or LP gas bottles, meters, values, regulators, etc., must have impact protection.
Full building and fire plan review is required.
Page 97
Building cannot be occupied or construction or renovations started until completion of building
and fire plan review.
All required means of egress shall have an exit discharge consisting of a non slip surface, and
leading to and terminating at a public way.
As building is not sprinkler, all portions of the exterior of the first floor shall be within 400 feet
of a fire hydrant.
Sprinkler system required in building 1, 2, and 4. Systems to be monitored. Suggest running a
water line for a sprinkler system to building 3.
Sprinklers required in basements over 2500 sq. ft.
Fire Department connection is to be located within 50 feet of main entrance. Parking cannot
interfere with access to the FDC.
Fire Department connection to be located within 300 feet of fire hydrant, measured as hose
would come off the fire equipment.
Fire alarm system required in buildings 1, 2, 4, and possibly 3.
Knox Box required at each building. Building 2 would require one at the restaurant and one at
the retail.
Project to be completed per approved Site Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
As discussed in the consultation meeting with the Fire Marshal, the following is required:
2 fire hydrants, one in the area of the East entrance and one in the area of the West entrance
between buildings 2 and 3.
This office suggests no on street parking on Maple Parkway
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
After any application has been approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant has a
maximum of thirty (30) days to appeal to the Code Board of Appeals Committee.
All comments from this office, approved by the Planning Commission are at the expense of the
owner/applicant.
The proposed building will be reviewed under __________ Occupancy.
The City of Dover uses the 2012 NFPA Life Safety Code, 2009 IBC, latest editions of all other
NFPA Codes and the 2012 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations.
Page 98
The Dover Fire Department request that a 8 ½ X 11 copy of the floor plan and site plan be
submitted to Station 1, attention Fire Chief, prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued.
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the Planning Department as soon as possible.
Page 99
CITY OF DOVER D
E
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
L
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D
O
D.A.C. MEETING DATE: January 6, 2014 T
===============================================================
APPLICATION: Tower Commons at 50 North DuPont Highway
FILE#: S-14-02 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT
CONTACT PERSON: Julio F. Seneus PHONE#: 760-2145
===============================================================
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT:
CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1. In order to be issued an entrance plan approval, the Department will require the
applicant to provide the proper forms, fees, and plans.
2. ADA compliant curb ramps and sidewalks will be required for this project along the
site frontage on Walker Road.
3. Per Section 3.6.5 of the Standards and Regulations for Subdivision Streets and State
Highway Access Adopted February 15, 2010, an 80-foot wide right-of-way (40-feet
from the centerline) is required for a minor arterial. According to the Kent County
Classification Maps, KCR 002 (US Route 13) is classified as a minor arterial. If the
existing right-of-way does not have the proper width along the frontage of the site,
the Department will require 40-feet of right-of-way dedication from the innermost
edge of the through lane for public use.
4. Per Section 3.6.5 of the Standards and Regulations for Subdivision Streets and State
Highway Access Adopted February 15, 2010, an 80-foot wide right-of-way (40-feet
from the centerline) is required for a minor arterial. According to the Kent County
Classification Maps, KCR 016 (East Division Street) is classified as a minor arterial.
If the existing right-of-way does not have the proper width along the frontage of the
site, the Department will require 40-feet of right-of-way dedication from the center
line of the road for public use.
5. Per Section 3.6.5 of the Standards and Regulations for Subdivision Streets and State
Highway Access Adopted February 15, 2010, an 80-foot wide right-of-way (40-feet
from the centerline) is required for a major collector. According to the Kent County
Page 100
Classification Maps, KCR 066 (Kings Highway NE) is classified as a major
collector. If the existing right-of-way does not have the proper width along the
frontage of the site, the Department will require 40-feet of right-of-way dedication
from the center line of the road for public use.
6. An additional 15’ permanent easement will be required along all site frontages for
this project.
7. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) will be required for this project, since the proposed
development exceeds 50 VPH (Vehicle per Hour) or 400 VPD (Vehicle per Day).
When the study is completed, DelDOT will review it and send the recommendations
of the improvements to the City. The improvements contained in the study will be
implemented by the developer per DelDOT's discretion. To set up a scoping meeting
for this project, please contact Mr. Troy Brestel at (302) 760-2167 or via e-mail at
Troy.Brestel@state.de.us.
RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE
OBJECTIVES:
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
The Department is requiring a pre-submittal meeting with the applicant, and the auxiliary
lanes warrants will be evaluated and discussed at the pre-submittal meeting.
If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the
above contact person and the planning department as soon as possible.
Page 101
CITY OF DOVER
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY
April 2014
APPLICATION: Tower Commons at 50 North DuPont Highway
FILE #: S-14-03
REVIEWING AGENCY: Kent Conservation District
CONTACT PERSON: David C. Cahill PHONE #: 741-2600 ext.3
THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN
IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT:
CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1. As of January 1, 2014 the new Delaware Stormwater Regulations have taken effect.
2. A Stormwater Assessment Study (SAS) package must be submitted to the Kent Conservation District prior
to a pre application meeting being scheduled.
3. As the disturbance for this site will exceed 5,000 square feet, a detailed sediment and stormwater management plan
must be reviewed and approved by our office prior to any land disturbing activity (i.e. clearing, grubbing, filling,
grading, etc.) taking place. The review fee and a completed Application for a Detailed Plan are due at the time of
plan submittal to our office. Construction inspection fees based on developed area and stormwater facility
maintenance inspection fees based on the number of stormwater facilities are due prior to the start of construction.
Please refer to the fee schedule for those amounts.
4. The following notes must appear on the record plan:
The Kent Conservation District reserves the right to enter private property for purposes of periodic site
inspection.
The Kent Conservation District reserves the right to add, modify, of delete any erosion or sediment
control measure, as it deems necessary.
A clear statement of defined maintenance responsibility for stormwater management facilities must be
provided on the Record Plan.
5. A soils investigation supporting the stormwater management facility design is required to determine impacts of the
seasonal high groundwater level and soils for any basin design.
ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT:
1. The project is currently under review by the District and is grandfathered under the old Delaware Stormwater
Regulation.
2. Green Technologies (bio retention, bio swales etc.) must be considered before traditional facilities can be considered.
The use of green technologies are contingent on the soil conditions.
3. The preferred methods of stormwater management are those practices that maximize the use of the natural features
of a site, promote recharge and minimize the reliance on structural components.
4. It is recommended that the stormwater management areas be incorporated into the overall landscape plan to enhance
water quality and to make the stormwater facility an attractive community amenity.
5. A letter of no objection to recordation will be provided once the detailed Sediment and Stormwater Management
plan has been approved.