Attachment

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION AGENDA JUNE 26, 2013 - 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 15 LOOCKERMAN PLAZA - DOVER, DELAWARE Public comments are welcomed on any item and will be permitted at appropriate times. When possible, please notify the City Clerk (736-7008 or e-mail at CityClerk@dover.de.us) should you wish to be recognized. 1. Call to Order/Roll Call 2. Moment of Silence 3. Adoption of Minutes A. Regular Meeting of June 27, 2012 B. Regular Meeting of April 24, 2013 4. Comments/Presentations from Members of the Community This segment is provided to extend the opportunity to the general public to share their questions, thoughts, comments, concerns, and complaints. Discussion of any item appearing on the agenda is prohibited. Citizen comments are limited to three (3) minutes, and this segment will not exceed 30 minutes. The Human Relations Commission is prohibited from taking action since items to be discussed do not appear on the published agenda; however, they may schedule such items as regular agenda items and act upon them in the future. 5. Chair's Report (Sudler) 6. Committee Reports A. School Programs (Wasfi) B. Community Programs (Allen-Pyne) C. Assessment (Edamatsu) D. Intake Forms 7. Unfinished Business A. Review/Recommendation to Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee - Resolution/Funding - Cessation of Illegal Gang Formation in Dover B. Formation of Grant Ad-Hoc Committee C. Formation of Resolution Ad-Hoc Committee 8. New Business A. Discussion - May 28, 2013 Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report - Proposed Amendments to Chapter 58 - Human Relations Commission 9. Scheduling of the Next Regular Meeting 10. Announcements 11. Adjournment by 9:00 p.m. /dd S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS\Misc-Agendas\HUMAN RELATIONS\2013\06-26-2013 DHRC.wpd THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.

DOVER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 2013 CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL, DOVER Present: Chairman, Roy Sudler, Jr., Vice Chair, Dawn Allen-Pyne, Commissioner Ellen O. Wasfi, Dr. Linda Hackett, Commissioner Justina H. Brewington, Commissioner and Commissioner Faye Della White Absent: Dr. Edamatsu. 1. Call to Order/Roll Call: Chairman, Roy Sudler, Jr. called the Dover Human Relations Commission Meeting to order on this day, Wednesday, April 24, 2013 at 7:16 p.m. 2. Moment of Silence: was observed. 3. Commissioner Wasfi motioned to have Approval of Minutes automatically placed on agenda as item number three on the agenda. Vice Chairman Dawn Allen-Pyne second Motioned Carried. 4. Comments/Presentations from Members of the Community: There were no comments made at this time. 5. Chair’s Report: Chairman Sudler asked the Commissioners to review the Chair’s Report. Chairman Sudler advised that the Flow Chart that was presented at the meeting he attended will be presented to the Commissioners at the next meeting. Chairman Sudler reported that on April 13, 2013 at approximately 8:30 p.m. to 3:00 pm he participated in the Delaware Department of Justice Crime Free Multi-Housing Program Training which reviewed: • City of Dover’s Property Inspection Tips • Best Practices For Landlords • Best Eviction Process For Landlords • Fair Housing and Tenant Screening Techniques On April 16, 2013 at approximately 5:46pm, a resident of Dover inquired about the process for filing an intake form with the Dover Human Relations Commission. Chairman Sudler explained to the person to the process and gave them an intake form. On April 17, 2013 at approximately 11:17am, Chairman Sudler was contacted by a resident of Dover who recently inquired about the Intake process for DHRC on April 16, 2013. The resident is working on a statement of events to file as an intake form with DHRC. DHRC-(PO) Case #01.2013-04-17 [01=Number of Cases 2013=Year-04=Month-17Day] 1

On April 22, 2013 at approximately 8:30pm, Chairman Sudler spoke with Chief James E. Hosfelt of the Dover Police Department and Ann Marie Townsend, City Developer and both individuals agreed to participate in a special forum titled Landlord’s and Tenant’s Obligation to Adhere to New City Ordinance #2013-04 Sec 22-331 (Purpose, Applicability, Definition and Compliance). On March 25, 2013 at approximately 7:47pm, Chairman Sudler presented the following items for review of content of the Speech Flowchart for Annual Presentation.:  ORIGIN OF THE DHRC In the year 2001, a Resident of Dover, Delaware named Reginald L. Hannah age 39, died while in custody of the Dover Police during a routine traffic stop. Reginald L. Hannah’s controversial death accompanied by death threats and shots fired towards Dover Police Officers, in result, sparked racial tension and intergroup conflict between most Caucasian and African American Communities. In an effort to relieve the racial tension in Dover, Delaware; Director of the State Human Relations Commission in 2001, Juana Fuentes-Bowles, NAACP, IMA, Councilman James Hutchison who was at that time was Mayor James Hutchison, Councilman Wallace R. Dixon, at that time Elder Wallace R. Dixon and myself Roy Sudler, Jr. all participated on the “Dover Community Harmony Panel” which helped to create the Dover Human Relations Commission. The issues, strategies, objectives and clergy involvement is provided for review in your annual report packet. 2. Enabling Legislative Powers and Duties Of the Dover Human Relations Commission is Pursuant to Chapter 2 – Administrative, Article I, Division 6, Section 2 – 21 and Article II Section 58 – 31 Titled Human Relations Commission’s Purpose; (1) Fairness and Respect among all citizens of Dover (2) Monitoring and developing ways to measure community relations particularly those that are a source of intergroup conflict (3) Involve all segments of the community in understanding and appreciating the benefits of positive intergroup relations (4) Offer a range of programs and services that will help its residents and neighborhoods prevent and resolve issues of human relations; and (5) Develop ways of anticipating, preparing for, and relieving community tensions arising from intergroup conflict.  The Commission Members are [Look at Slide] We will now review item #3 3. The Commission’s Meeting and Procedural Flowchart States that once the Commission has received an Intake Form from a Resident of Dover, it is then submitted to the City Clerk’s Office for a case number and placed on the Commission’s Business Meeting Agenda under New Business, ten [10] days prior to the next scheduled meeting. 2

Pursuant to the Flowchart, the Commission is responsible and charged with investigating the facts, merit and jurisdiction of the complaint in a hearing session. The Commission only hears both parties testimony and does not make a decision during the night of the hearing. The Commission’s Recommendation for Action and Jurisdiction is assessed at the Decision-Making Meeting which is held at a later date determined by the Commission after considering all of the facts and circumstance related to the complaint. We will now review item #4 4. 2012 INTAKE FORMS REPORTED The first report was filed in January 2012, which involved an array of 1. 3/5 Index Cards that were disseminated on the streets of Down - Town Dover and Delaware State University’s Campus which displayed an image of a person of color hanging by a rope tied to his or her neck from a tree with a racial slur statement saying, “Cleaning Up the Streets One Nigger at a Time”  The second report was also filed in January 2012, which involved an 2. Alleged Excessive Force Complaint between a Dover Police Officer and a Dover Resident. The witness to the alleged assault feared for his or her safety and chose not to report the incident to Industrial Affairs for the Dover Police Department. The third report was filed in September 2012, which involved an 3. Alleged Hanging Report that according to Henry Fordham, took place at Silver-Lake Recreational Park located in Dover, Delaware on September 21, 2012. On September 28, 2012, The Dover Human Relations Commission scheduled a Special Roundtable Meeting for October 5, 2012, to hear the testimony of Mr. Henry Fordham. [Please see Roundtable Agenda pg. 30, City Solicitor’s Opinion pg.34 and 4th District Councilmen Andersons Opinion on pg. 35 in Annual Report]  We will now review item # 5. ITEM 5 Complaint against DHRC On November 5, 2012, the City Clerk’s Office and City Manager received an official complaint from Mr. Eshed Alston a resident of Dover, who claims that the Commission is not investigating or informing the Black Community of the factual existence of lynching activity in the City of Dover. [Please review pg. 33 of Annual Report 3

Item 6 DHRC - CONCERNS: The Dover Human Relations Commission is very concerned about the amount of intake forms that indicate racial tension in the City of Dover being deferred out to other agencies for investigation. Pursuant to Chapter 2 – Administrative, Article I, Division 6, Section 2 – 21 and Article II Section 58 – 31 Titled Human Relations Commission’s Purpose; the Commission has been granted the Powers and Duties to investigate claims of unfair treatment and develop ways to monitor intergroup conflict among all segments of the City of Dover. The ambiguity of our purpose and constant deferrals of intake complaint forms followed by constant ostracism from constituents of Dover regarding the Commission’s lack of investigating official intake complaint forms have unfortunately, contributed significantly to the resignation of current and previous commission members, especially after hearing the nature and urgency of resident’s concerns and not being able to investigate the merit of their complaint. In an effort to avoid further resignations of current and future Commission Members, it is my recommendation, as Chairman of the Dover Human Relations Commission, that the Mayor and City Council of Dover, Delaware, conduct a Special Meeting with the Dover Human Relations Commission, City Clerk’s Office and City Solicitor in quest of interpreting Chapter 2 – Administrative, Article I, Division 6, Section 2 – 21 of the Dover Code and Article II. Human Relations Commission, Sec. 58-31. Purpose: to mitigate or eradicate current and future Commission Member’s concerns and feelings of not fulfilling their duties as Commissioners who advocate Human and Civil Rights for all segments of Dover, Delaware. We will now review item # 7. Item 7 Certificates of Training Were received in the areas of 1) Title 25 State of Delaware’s Landlord / Tenant Codes This training covered key issues involving: Fair Housing Initiatives Landlord & Tenant’s Remedies for Breach of Rules and Covenants; and Zero-Tolerance Rules & Regulations for Subsidy Housing [HUD] [Please refer to pg. 16 of your annual report packet] The second training identified 2) How to Investigate and Prosecute Hate Crimes The training covered an array of topics such as the need for Non-Governmental Organizations to be more proactive and aware of the statutes and laws involving hate crimes.  This training was the foundation of the Dover Human Relations Commission’s Special Meeting conducted on August 9, 2012 [Please review attachment for training outline on pg. 7 of your Annual Report Packet] 4

Item 8 ******************************************************************** SPECIAL FORUM ON COMMUNITY AND STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN REPORTING AND RESOLVING HATE CRIMES IN COMMUNITIES AND HIGHER LEARNING INSTITUTIONS: ********************************************************************  Was a partnership initiative with the State Human Relations Commission, Delaware Department of Justice, Delaware State University Police Department, Delaware State University’s Counseling Division, 31st District House of Representative Darryl Scott and the Dover Human Relations Commission in accordance with Article II. Section 58 – 21 (1) Fairness \ Respect and (4) Prevent and Monitor Human Relations in Dover, Delaware. The forum focused on raising the awareness and involvement in resolving and reporting racial and sexual orientation hate crimes in Dover and throughout the State of Delaware. In addition, to review ethical remedies for dealing with emotional, spiritual, and social challenges for victims of bias- motivated violence. Some of the highlighted information discussed was Title 42 U.S.C. Code 3631 as a Hate Crime covered under the State of Delaware’s Title 11 Code 1304 Section (a) (2), selection of victim due to race and sexual orientation. Chief Prosecutor of Kent County, Delaware {Ken Haltom Esq.} from the Department of Justice stated, “He knows that hate crimes occur more often than what is being reported and he feels and understands the frustration that a person can experience, but he believes that forums such as this one would help to promote healthy dialogue and change in the State of Delaware. In fact, Chief Haltom shared with the Commission that out of 15 years of practicing law, this forum was the first of its kind according to his experience, which he feels is a big change for him, one which he embrace and is eager to be a big part of. [Please Review Special Forum Minutes Located on pg. 18 – 29 Annual Report]  In conclusion of the Dover Human Relations Commission’s 2012 Annual Report Presentation, Item number 9 titled: PROPOSED RESOLUTION AND FUNDING ********************************************************************was approved by the Commission on June 27, 2012, The Commission’s approval of the final resolution draft, titled: Cessation of Illegal Gang Formation in Dover, Delaware, was due to the amount of complaints and concerns from Dover Residents and Business Owners complaining about the enormous amount of gang activity and graffiti growth in the City of Dover and throughout Kent County. 5

This Resolution was written as a plan of action to provide the City of Dover with additional monetary resources and youth enrichment programs that will help eliminate illegal gang activity in the City of Dover. According to the City’s Controller Mrs. Donna Mitchell, the City’s Human Relations Commission is the first Commission to seek or inquire about a grant on behalf of the City during her tenure with the City of Dover. The Principle of the Grant is provided by OJJDP, which promotes Defending Childhood Resource Centers and Improving the Nation’s Response to Children Exposed to Violence. [Please turn to page 13 – 15 of the annual report and follow me as I read the resolution.] DHRC – 2012 PROPOSED RESOLUTION & FUNDING FOR CESSATION OF ILLEGAL GANG FORMATION IN DOVER, DELAWARE *********************************************************** Whereas; The City of Dover, the State Capital, strives to be a model for all cities in Delaware and the United States. Whereas; The Mayor and City Council have granted Powers and Duties to the Dover Human Relations Commission, Pursuant to Article II. Sec. 58-31. Whereas; Article II Sec. 58-31 titles (2), (4) and (5) charges the DHRC with developing ways to measure and monitor community relations and offer a range of programs and services that will help Dover residents identify and resolve issues of human relations; anticipating, preparing for, and relieving community tensions arising from intergroup conflict.(Code 1981, § 2-16; Ord. of 2-11-2002) Whereas; The Dover Human Relations Commission through open discussion with members of the community and the knowledge of local events has found that gun possession and illegal gang activity is at an all-time high. Whereas; Illegal gangs are a group of individuals consisting of three or more persons whose demoralizing influence, common interest, attitude and graffiti signs significantly contribute to the commission of disruptive behavior and criminal enterprises in the City of Dover. Whereas; the number of illegal gang organizations in Dover and Kent County has increased over the last few years, cultivating an environment of psychic imprisonment, mistrust and fear among citizens of Dover. Whereas; Illegal gang culture and activities have played a significant role in student dropout rates, drug activity and random acts of violence, often leaving innocent bystanders paralyzed and traumatized for life. Whereas; Illegal gang graffiti promoting hate, fear and danger has defaced public and private sector facilities, impeding home and business owner’s rights to market or enjoy their property, without unwelcomed and unauthorized graffiti signs. Therefore, Be it Resolved; That the Residents of Dover, Delaware, the Mayor, City Council, Dover Police Department, Delaware Department of Justice and the Dover Human Relations Commission have observed with dismay the escalation of gang growth and development in our communities and will merge resources and efforts to intensify the pursuit of eliminating illegal gang formation, activities, and communication, including the display of graffiti signs in Dover, Delaware. 6

Be it Further Resolved; that we will accomplish this goal and establish a New Community and Family Involvement Paradigm for Cessation of Illegal Gang Formation by 1. Cleaning up our streets together, showing resistance to illegal gang formation and unwelcomed graffiti signs through unity and clear purpose; 2. Increasing individual’s awareness and accountability for reporting known illegal gang activity and \ or formation in your community. 3. Strengthening parent and family involvement in the childrearing and educational process 4. Implementing and supporting additional intervention and summer programs; and 5. Providing additional funding to the Dover Police Department through grant and other resources to establish additional police stations in areas with high volumes of crime to protect Dover residents from being a target of bias-motivated violence in the City of Dover. As the year 2013 continues, the Dover Human Relations Commission looks forward to addressing unfair treatment claims in an effort to promote and monitor amicable relations between all races in the City of Dover. On behalf of the Dover Human Relations Commission, we thank The Mayor and Dover City Council Members for appointing each and every one of us, to serve the Dover Community in such an imperative and essential way. o That will conclude the Dover Human Relations Commission’s 2012 Annual Report Thank You. Are there any Questions??????????? That concluded the Chair’s report. Dr. Hackett commented that the report was very well done. Chairman Sudler stated that the new Commissioners should express their concerns. He also mentioned the problem with the turnover of Commissioners. Dr. Hackett and Commissioner White mentioned that they attended the Mayors Reception and spoke to the Mayor regarding more support. Commissioner Wasfi mentioned that we should have a follow through with what was mentioned in the Annual Report. 6. Committee Report: a. School Programs Commissioner Wasfi – nothing to report at this time. b. Community Programs: Commissioner Dawn Allen-Pyne – nothing to report at this time. c. Assessment: Commissioner Edamatsu – not present to report. 7

d. Intake Forms: Chairman Sudler asked if anyone was interested in fulfilling the Intake Form Chair position. Commissioner Brewington and Vice Chair Allen-Pyne agreed to oversee this position. Commissioner White said she will help as needed. Chairman Sudler appointed Commissioner Brewington and Vice Chair Allen-Pyne fill this position. Dr. Hackett stated that the problem she sees is where people go in with an intake and the Commissioners are not aware of it. She believes that we should be made aware and advised if it was out sourced. Commissioner Wasfi suggested that we need to inquire about obtaining a mailbox for the Commission in order to receive incoming intake forms. 7. Unfinished Business: a. Formation of an Ad Hoc Committee for Grant Proposal – Chairman Sudler differed this until our next meeting. b. Formation of an Ad Hoc Committee for Resolution Proposal – Chairman Sudler differed this until our next meeting. 8. New Business: a. Commissioners Wasfi meeting with a Native American Chief – Commissioner Wasfi reported that November is Native American Heritage Month and she is working on creating a Resolution. She also reported that the League of Women Voters had a program of Document of Discovery telling of the problems they face in society. Chief Dennis Coker will work with the Commission on a Resolution. Commissioner Wasfi stated once we review the Document of Discovery, we will see their struggles as a minority and as part of the community. b. Chairman Sudler asked if we can review the last part of his packet labeled “Landlord Tenants Ordinance”. Chairman Sudler stated that the Commissioners need to educate the community on how they will be affected by this new ordinance. Chairman Sudler mentioned that we should have a Special Forum. Commissioner Wasfi said this ordinance was in the paper change and followed by Council. Chairman Sudler ask for a motion to accept a Special Forum to go over Landlord Tenant Ordinance Commissioner White motioned Commissioner Wasfi second It was agreed up that on Wednesday, June 5, 2013 at 7pm this Special Forum will take place. Chairman Sudler advised that Dover Chief of Police and Ann Marie Townsend said they will attend such a forum to go over the new ordinances. This will be advertised in the newspaper and Commissioner White will get the information for the press release from the Dover Post. c. DHRC Community Meetings: Dr. Hackett was appointed by Chairman Sudler to oversee this task. Chairman Sudler reported that Bible Way has agreed to allow the Commission to meet in their basement for Community Meetings. Commissioner White said Village II will also make their facility available. Dr. Hackett said Calvary will let us use their facility. d. Dr. Hackett stated that she will shoot for Sunday, June 23rd for the Commissions first visitation. 9. Scheduling of the Next Regular Meeting: May 22, 2013 @ 7pm at Dover City Hall 8

10. Announcements: a. Commissioner Wasfi announced that the YMCA will be sponsoring a Race Relations Forum this Saturday in Newark. She advised that she will email the announcement to the Commissioners. Commissioner Wasfi also announced that April 26, 2013 is International Seed Day. b. Chairman Sudler announced that the Department of Justice plans on having a document shredding event on Saturday, May 4, 2013 from 9am to 1pm in DelDOT’ S Administration Building parking lot. 11. Adjournment : Commissioner Sudler asked for motion to adjourn the meeting Commissioner Wasfi made motion for the meeting to be adjourned Vice Chair, Dawn Allen-Pyne second. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:10pm Respectfully Submitted, Belinda Talton 9

DHRC – 2012 PROPOSED RESOLUTION & FUNDING A. RESOLUTION: CESSATION OF ILLEGAL GANG FORMATION IN DOVER, DELAWARE ************************************************************************* Whereas; The City of Dover, the State Capital, strives to be a model for all cities in Delaware and the United State. Whereas; The Mayor and City Council have granted Powers and Duties to the Dover Human Relations Commission, Pursuant to Article II. Sec. 58-31. Whereas; Article II Sec. 58-31 titles (2), (4) and (5) charges the DHRC with developing ways to measure and monitor community relations and offer a range of programs and services that will help Dover residents identify and resolve issues of human relations; anticipating, preparing for, and relieving community tensions arising from intergroup conflict.(Code 1981, § 2-16; Ord. of 2-11- 2002) Whereas; The Dover Human Relations Commission through open discussion with members of the community and the knowledge of local events has found that gun possession and illegal gang activity is at an all-time high. Whereas; Illegal gangs are a group of individuals consisting of three or more persons whose demoralizing influence, common interest, attitude and graffiti signs significantly contribute to the commission of disruptive behavior and criminal enterprises in the City of Dover. Whereas; The number of illegal gang organizations in Dover and Kent County has increased over the last few years, cultivating an environment of psychic imprisonment, mistrust and fear among citizens of Dover. 1

Whereas; Illegal gang culture and activities have played a significant role in student dropout rates, drug activity and random acts of violence, often leaving innocent bystanders paralyzed and traumatized for life. Whereas; Illegal gang graffiti promoting hate, fear and danger has defaced public and private sector facilities, impeding home and business owner’s rights to market or enjoy their property, without unwelcomed and unauthorized graffiti signs. Therefore, Be it Resolved; That the Residents of Dover, Delaware, the Mayor, City Council, Dover Police Department, Delaware Department of Justice and the Dover Human Relations Commission have observed with dismay the escalation of gang growth and development in our communities and will merge resources and efforts to intensify the pursuit of eliminating illegal gang formation, activities, and communication, including the display of graffiti signs in Dover, Delaware. Be it Further Resolved; That we will accomplish this goal and establish a New Community and Family Involvement Paradigm for Cessation of Illegal Gang Formation by 1. Cleaning up our streets together, showing resistance to illegal gang formation and unwelcomed graffiti signs through unity and clear purpose; 2. Increasing individual’s awareness and accountability for reporting known illegal gang activity and \ or formation in your community. 3. Strengthening parent and family involvement in the childrearing and educational process 4. Implementing and supporting additional intervention and summer programs; and 2

5. Providing additional funding to the Dover Police Department through grants and other resources to establish additional police stations in areas with high volumes of crime to protect Dover residents from being a target of bias-motivated violence in the City of Dover. B). Grant Sample: OJJDP FY 2012 Defending Childhood Resource Center: Improving the Nation’s Response to Children Exposed to Violence. 3

EXCERPT FROM THE LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF MAY 28, 2013 The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting was held on May 28, 2013, at 5:36 p.m. with Chairman Lynn presiding. Members present were Mr. Hare, Mr. Slavin, Mr. Rushe, and Mr. Shevock. Members of Council present were Council President Bonar, Mr. Dixon, and Mr. Hutchison. Mayor Carey was also present. Proposed Amendments to Chapter 58 - Human Relations Commission Members were reminded that in March 2001, two (2) incidents occurred which caused racial tension and divisiveness within the City of Dover, as follows: 1) the shooting of a police officer in the Capital Green area; and 2) the death of Mr. Reginald Hannah. As a result, then Mayor Hutchison requested an Emergency Council Meeting to discuss the conflicting issues involving the community, which was held on March 25, 2001. Subsequently, the Delaware Human Relations Commission held a series of Dover Community Meetings throughout the year to begin a dialogue and develop objectives to restore and rebuild the community, together with all citizens of Dover. Those that attended these meetings worked to develop and prioritize a list of issues as well as strategies and objectives to resolve those issues. During those Community Meetings, it was suggested that a local Human Relations Commission be established. As a result, during their Regular Meeting of February 22, 2002, Dover City Council adopted an ordinance establishing the City of Dover Human Relations Commission (DHRC). Mr. Hutchison advised members of his concerns regarding the Dover Human Relations Commission. He noted that although the Commission was established to restore and rebuild the community, during the past several years, the Commission had experienced low meeting attendance (by both members and citizens), and that the Mayor and Council have received resignations from numerous members. As a result, the Commission has experienced difficulty in obtaining the required quorum of members to convene meetings and conduct official business. In addition, Mr. Hutchison indicated that there had been a lack of communication between the Commission and Council, as well as between the Commission and members of City staff. The Commission had repeatedly jeopardized the City’s compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) through its disregard of requests to provide detailed meeting minutes. Mr. Hutchison recommended that the Committee examine the role and performance of the Dover Human Relations Commission to determine the following: 1) if the Commission is fulfilling its purpose; 2) if there is evidence of a continued necessity for the Commission, or if it is a duplication of services provided by other agencies, committees, etc. within the City and/or State of Delaware; 3) the possibility of amending Sec. 58-33 (c) - Meetings, of the Dover Code to limit the Commission to meeting on an as needed basis, in the same manner as many other City committees, commissions and boards, including the Construction Code Appeals Committee, Election Board, Ethics Commission, and Property Maintenance Code Board of Appeals; 4) the possibility of amending Sec. 58-32 (b) - Composition; appointment, of the Dover Code to reduce the membership of the Commission from fifteen (15) to seven (7), which would maintain the threshold originally proposed during the Dover Community Meeting of December 4, 2001; and 5) direct staff to prepare a Proposed Ordinance reflecting the recommendation of the Committee for a First Reading at City Council during the Regular Meeting of June 10, 2013 and Final Reading on June 24, 2013.

EXCERPT FROM THE LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF MAY 28, 2013 PAGE 2 Concurring with the concerns of Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Hare also felt that 15 members was too many and stated his understanding that the State Human Relations Commission only meets when a complaint has been filed. He felt that this was the intent of Council when establishing the Dover Human Relations Commission. Mr. Dixon suggested that training be provided for members of the Commission, as well as the City at-large, by the State Human Relations Commission. He explained that training would provide guidelines for members and give them information on their mission and what could be done to help the City. Mr. Bonar also agreed that 15 members was too large a body and that if the City chose to continue to have such a commission, its members should be provided a set standard of guidelines so that they have a clear understanding of their duties and responsibilities. As mentioned by Mr. Hare, it was his understanding that holding meetings on a regular basis had sometimes caused members to “go on fishing expeditions” to conjure up issues, which he felt did not serve the City or its citizens. He suggested that members examine the structure and the contents of rules and regulations for the operation of the Commission. In response to Mr. Slavin, Mr. Hutchison concurred that Recommendation #5, directing staff to prepare a Proposed Ordinance reflecting the recommendation of the Committee for a First Reading at City Council during the Regular Meeting of June 10, 2013 and Final Reading on June 24, 2013, should be delayed until the completion of Recommendations #1-4. Mr. Roy Sudler, Jr., Chairman of the DHRC, agreed that 15 members may be too many, explaining that it was challenging at times to obtain a quorum at meetings. It was his belief that the State Human Relations Commission had a significant role in the establishment of the by-laws and procedures established for the DHRC. He felt that the State Human Relations Commission could assist the City in providing guidance in functioning more effectively. Mr. Sudler reminded members that he was recently requested to conduct a self-review of the DHRC, which was considered by Council on January 23, 2012. He noted that #7 of that report indicated the need for the DHRC and the City to work together to develop an improved and long-range strategy plan and an annual operational plan for the Commission, which would greatly enhance the Commission and City’s ability to monitor, measure, and evaluate the effectiveness of the City and the Commission in meeting its five (5) standard needs. Referring to the five (5) standard needs, he suggested that members consider what had been accomplished since 2010 and review the 2012 Annual Report of the Commission. He felt that members would then be able to make a more educated decision in regard to a plan of action. In conclusion, Mr. Sudler provided a Demand for Hearing, Written Complaint and Memorandum of Record, which was submitted to the DHRC by EShed Alston, expressing his opinion that the DHRC Chairman, Roy Sudler, Jr., should be removed from office (Attachment #3). Ms. Linda Hackett, 1117 Charles Drive, advised members that she serves on the DHRC and indicated her desire to meet with City officials to discuss tasks that should be focused on together. She supported the Commission and indicated that there was a lot of work necessary to address many

EXCERPT FROM THE LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF MAY 28, 2013 PAGE 3 concerns throughout the City. She relayed her interest in the youth in the City and felt that the Commission should be a viable part of the community and that great things could be accomplished if the City and the Commission worked more closely together. It was her hope that members would be provided an objective and that everyone be made aware of what is expected of both the Commission and the City. Mr. Shevock moved to recommend that this matter be referred to staff to formulate a recommendation for the Committee’s consideration and that a date be established for the First Reading of the related proposed ordinance, seconded by Mr. Hare. Mr. Slavin relayed his opposition, explaining that what had been recommended was for the Committee to conduct the examination and then the matter would be referred to staff for the drafting of an ordinance. He explained that referring it directly to staff would place them in a difficult position and felt that it would be disingenuous for members to indicate a desire to have discussions of the issues and without holding such discussion. Mr. Slavin suggested that a Special Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting be scheduled specifically to discuss this issue and noted that there may be a need to have more than one (1) meeting. Mr. Shevock withdrew his motion, as did the seconder. Mr. Slavin moved to recommend that the Chair of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee schedule a Special meeting for the purposes of discussing Recommendation Items #1-5 included in the Committee Action Form pertaining to the Dover Human Relations Commission. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Lynn stated that he would schedule a Special Committee Meeting following Council’s approval of the Committee’s recommendation. S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS\Misc-Packets\2013\HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION\06-26-2013\ORIGINALS\Excerpt - 05-28-2013 LF&A - Proposed Amendments to Chp 58 - Human Relations Commission.wpd Attachments Attachment #3 - Demand for Hearing, Written Complaint and Memorandum of Record submitted by Mr. Eshed Alston

ATTACHMENT #3 LF&A COMMITTEE MEETING OF 05-28-2013

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee MEETING DATE: 05/28/13 DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Council PREPARED BY: Denise L. Devine, Assistant City Clerk, on Behalf of Councilman James Hutchison, Sr. SUBJECT: Dover Human Relations Commission DATE SUBMITTED: 05/23/2013 RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: LF&A Committee and City Council EXHIBITS: Dover Community Meeting Minutes (May 1, 2001 - December 4, 2001); Chapter 58 - Human Relations, Article II - Human Relations Commission of the Dover Code TIMETABLE: Direct staff to prepare a Proposed Ordinance reflecting the recommendation of the Committee for First Reading by City Council during the Regular Meeting of June 10, 2013 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Councilman Hutchison requests that the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee examine the role and performance of the Dover Human Relations Commission to determine the following: 1) if the Commission is fulfilling its purpose; 2) if there is evidence of a continued necessity for the Commission, or if it is a duplication of services provided by other agencies, committees, etc. within the City and/or State of Delaware; 3) the possibility of amending Sec. 58-33 (c) - Meetings, of the Dover Code to limit the Commission to meeting on an as needed basis, in the same manner as many other City committees, commissions and boards, including the Construction Code Appeals Committee, Election Board, Ethics Commission, and Property Maintenance Code Board of Appeals; 4) the possibility of amending Sec. 58- 32 (b) - Composition; appointment, of the Dover Code to reduce the membership of the Commission from fifteen (15) to seven (7), which would maintain the threshold originally proposed during the Dover Community Meeting of December 4, 2001; and 5) direct staff to prepare a Proposed Ordinance reflecting the recommendation of the Committee for First Reading at City Council during the Regular Meeting of June 10, 2013 and Final Reading on June 24, 2013. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS In 2001, two (2) incidents occurred during the month of March (one (1) involving the shooting of a police officer in the Capital Green area, and one (1) involving the death of Mr. Reginald Hannah) which caused racial tension and divisiveness within the City of Dover. As a result, Mayor Hutchison requested an Emergency Council Meeting to discuss the conflicting issues involving the community, which was held on March 25, 2001. Subsequently, the Delaware Human Relations Commission held a series of Dover Community Meetings throughout the year (Exhibits), to begin a dialogue and develop objectives to restore and rebuild the community, together with all citizens of Dover. Those in attendance at these Community Meetings worked to develop and prioritize a list of issues as well as strategies and objectives for resolution. During the Dover Community Meeting held on August 28, 2001, those present reviewed five (5) alternatives for developing a forum for the community. During the Dover Community Meeting of September 25, 2001, Councilman Eugene Ruane reviewed a list of what he felt the responsibilities of a local Human Relations Commission would entail.

Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Meeting of May 28, 2013 Page 2 Committee Action Form - Dover Human Relations Commission During their Regular Meeting of February 22, 2002, Dover City Council adopted an ordinance establishing the City of Dover Human Relations Commission. The Commission was established to restore and rebuild the community, however, during the past several years, the Commission has experienced low meeting attendance rates, by both members and citizens, and the Mayor and Council have received resignations from numerous members. As a result, the Commission has experienced difficulty in obtaining the required quorum of members to convene meetings and conduct official business. Additionally, there is a lack of communication between the Commission and Council, as well as between the Commission and members of City staff. The Commission has repeatedly jeopardized the City’s compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) through its disregard of requests to provide detailed meeting minutes. Councilman Hutchison requests that the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee examine the role and performance of the Dover Human Relations Commission to determine the following: 1) if the Commission is fulfilling its purpose; 2) if there is evidence of a continued necessity for the Commission, or if it is a duplication of services provided by other agencies, committees, etc. within the City and/or State of Delaware; 3) the possibility of amending Sec. 58-33 (c) - Meetings, of the Dover Code to limit the Commission to meeting on an as needed basis, in the same manner as many other City committees, commissions and boards, including the Construction Code Appeals Committee, Election Board, Ethics Commission, and Property Maintenance Code Board of Appeals; 4) the possibility of amending Sec. 58-32 (b) - Composition; appointment, of the Dover Code to reduce the membership of the Commission from fifteen (15) to seven (7), which would maintain the threshold originally proposed during the Dover Community Meeting of December 4, 2001; and 5) direct staff to prepare a Proposed Ordinance reflecting the recommendation of the Committee for First Reading at City Council during the Regular Meeting of June 10, 2013 and Final Reading on June 24, 2013. S:\CAFS\05-28-2013-LF&A-Human Relations Commission Historical Overview CAF.wpd

EXCERPT FROM CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 22, 2001 HUMAN RELATIONS COMMITTEE UPDATE Ms. Juana Fuentes-Bowles, Director of the Delaware State Division of Human Relations advised members that a group of community members have worked diligently to begin dialogue, and develop objectives and strategies to restore and rebuild the community. As an enforcement agency of the State Human Relations Commission, she stated that there are many tasks one of which is to promote amicable relationships among all racial ethnical groups in the State of Delaware. During the past six (6) months, the State Human Relations Commission felt that due to the climate in the Dover community, it was important to take necessary steps to develop strategies to avoid potential escalating tension within the community. Ms. Fuentes-Bowles relayed appreciation for those members of Council and staff that have been participating in the meetings that have occurred for the past several months. As a result, she stated that the group has identified seven (7) priority issues that need to be addressed, as follows: 1) concerns of citizens; 2) how citizens are viewed by local officials; 3) how citizens view the Dover Police Department; 4) isolation; 5) Dover Police Department recruitment, promotions, retention, new hires, minority group members, etc.; 6) role of the Capital School District; and 7) the media. Referring to the first issue being citizens’ concerns, Ms. Fuentes-Bowles explained that citizens feared that if they made a complaint, there would be adverse actions towards them, and that many were not aware of how to make a complaint to the City or the Police Department. A Task Force was developed in formulating a process to address these issues. On behalf of the Task Force, she presented a new Citizen Complaint Form and Citizen Complaint Process Brochure to Chief Horvath developed to be used by the City of Dover Police Department. It is hoped that the Chief, as well as Mayor and Council will welcome and implement the form and brochure as a part of City policy. On behalf of the Dover Police Department, Chief Horvath commended all those that worked on this project and relayed assurance that the new form and brochure will be utilized, stating his feeling that it will enhance the department’s public service. Ms. Fuentes-Bowles advised members that the next Human Relations Commission’s meeting is scheduled to be held on November 20, 2001 at 6:30 p.m. at the State DelDOT facility. The topic for discussion is to consider the establishment of a local Human Relations Commission. Council President McGlumphy thanked Ms. Fuentes-Bowles and the members of the Human Relations Commission and other community participants for beginning the building of harmony in the City and for taking positive action in this regard.

Municode Page 1 of 3 Dover, Delaware, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - CODE OF ORDINANCES >> Chapter 58 - HUMAN RELATIONS >> ARTICLE II. - HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION >> ARTICLE II. - HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Sec. 58-31. - Purpose. Sec. 58-32. - Established; composition; appointment; representation; holding other office; removal from office; terms of office; vacancies; reappointments. Sec. 58-33. - Organization; quorum; meetings; rules of procedure; limitation of functions; agreements; compensation; legal counsel; reports. Sec. 58-34. - Expenses. Sec. 58-35. - Conflicts of interest. Sec. 58-36. - Powers and duties. Sec. 58-31. - Purpose. The city council has deemed it to be in the best interest of the city to establish a human relations commission to include members who are broadly representative of the entire community and who are committed to a philosophy of inclusion, intergroup cooperation, and fair treatment that will effectively help the city meet the following needs: (1) Fairness, respect. Promote and develop an environment of fairness and respect among its citizens; (2) Monitoring. Develop ways to measure and monitor community relations, particularly those that are sources of intergroup conflict; (3) Intergroup relations. Involve all segments of the community in understanding and appreciating the benefits of positive intergroup relations; (4) Issues. Offer a range of programs and services that will help its residents and neighborhoods prevent and resolve issues of human relations; and (5) Intergroup conflict. Develop ways of anticipating, preparing for, and relieving community tensions arising from intergroup conflict. (Code 1981, § 2-16; Ord. of 2-11-2002) Sec. 58-32. - Established; composition; appointment; representation; holding other office; removal from office; terms of office; vacancies; reappointments. (a) Established. There is hereby established an advisory commission to be known as the "City of Dover Human Relations Commission," to carry out the objectives as described in this article. (b) Composition; appointment. The commission shall consist of 15 members, all residents of the city. Five of these members shall be appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the city council. Ten of these members shall be appointed by the president of the council, based upon recommendations from the council and confirmed by the council. (c) Representation. In selecting the membership of the commission, the mayor and president of the council and the council shall take particular care to ensure that the commission is broadly representative of racial, religious, gender and ethnic groups residing in the city. http://library.municode.com/print.aspx?h=&clientID=13910&HTMRequest=http%3a%2f... 5/23/2013

Municode Page 2 of 3 (d) Holding other office; removal. No member of the commission shall hold any elected or appointed office under the government of the United States or the state, county, or city. The mayor or the city council president may remove members of the commission, with the concurrence of the city council, for substantial neglect of duty, or gross misconduct in office. (e) Terms of office; vacancies. A member of the commission shall be appointed for a term of office of three years and until his successor has been appointed and has qualified. The appointees shall be appointed for staggered terms of office. When a vacancy occurs in the membership of the commission, it shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired portion of the term in the same manner as the original appointment. (f) Reappointments. Members may be reappointed. (Code 1981, § 2-17; Ord. of 2-11-2002; Ord. No. 2010-23, 8-23-2010) Sec. 58-33. - Organization; quorum; meetings; rules of procedure; limitation of functions; agreements; compensation; legal counsel; reports. (a) Organization. The human relations commission shall annually elect its own chairperson to preside over its meetings and may create and fill such other offices and committees among its members as may be found necessary and proper for its effective organization. (b) Quorum. A majority of the membership of the commission shall constitute a quorum and, if a quorum is present, a vacancy on the commission shall not impair the right of the remaining members to exercise all the powers of the commission. (c) Meetings. The commission shall hold such meetings as may be deemed necessary for the completion of its purposes, responsibilities and functions. Regular meetings shall be held at least once per month unless there is no business to be considered by the commission. Special meetings may be called by the chairperson or three members of the commission. (d) Rules of procedure. The commission is also authorized to adopt rules of procedure for the conduct of its meetings. (e) Functions limited. The commission shall not involve itself in activities or functions already assigned by law or decree to other governmental bodies. (f) Agreements. The commission may enter into agreements and build partnerships with other entities and organizations for the purpose of more efficiently and effectively carrying out its responsibilities. (g) Compensation. Members of the commission shall receive no compensation. (h) Legal counsel. The city solicitor shall provide legal counsel to the commission and shall be the legal representative of the commission in connection with its duties hereunder, on a case -by-case basis, or determine that outside counsel is needed and obtain such outside counsel for a particular matter. (i) Reports. The commission shall make such reports to the mayor and city council as shall be periodically necessary. An annual report of its accomplishments and a summary of its recommendations, as appropriate, shall be sent to the mayor and the city council. (Code 1981, § 2-18; Ord. of 2-11-2002) Sec. 58-34. - Expenses. (a) Budget. The city council may appropriate a budget for the city human relations commission to provide for necessary expenses and expenditures. (b) http://library.municode.com/print.aspx?h=&clientID=13910&HTMRequest=http%3a%2f... 5/23/2013

Municode Page 3 of 3 Other funding. The commission may also receive funding from other governmental, philanthropic or private organizations for the exclusive purpose of carrying out its responsibilities. (Code 1981, § 2-19; Ord. of 2-11-2002) Sec. 58-35. - Conflicts of interest. If any member of the human relations commission concludes that he has a conflict of interest with respect to a matter which is pending before the commission, that member shall disqualify himself from participating in any deliberations, discussions and decision making processes of the commission. (Code 1981, § 2-20; Ord. of 2-11-2002) Sec. 58-36. - Powers and duties. The powers and duties of the human relations commission shall be to: (1) Recommendations. Review city programs, activities, functions and ordinances, and make recommendations to the city council for new, amended or changed programs, functions, activities or ordinances which would support inclusiveness and civility among city residents and enhance communication and understanding among residents of the city; (2) Intergroup conflicts. Inquire into incidents of intergroup conflicts and disputes within the city and take such action as may be designed to alleviate such conflicts and disputes; (3) Intergroup cooperation. Promote and encourage communications between and cooperation of all groups interested in bettering human relations in the city; (4) Complaints. Seek the active assistance of the state human relations commission in the solution of complaints of alleged discrimination which fall within the jurisdiction of the state commission; (5) Research, education, etc. Engage in such research, education and advocacy as, in the judgment of the commission or the city council, may be needed to improve human relations in the city; (6) Programs. Develop and maintain programs that build positive relations among communities and enhance problem-solving skills among residents throughout the city; (7) Other functions. Do all other acts and deeds necessary and proper to carry out and effectively accomplish the objectives, functions and services contemplated by the provisions of this article. (Code 1981, § 2-21; Ord. of 2-11-2002) http://library.municode.com/print.aspx?h=&clientID=13910&HTMRequest=http%3a%2f... 5/23/2013