Attachment

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MARCH 11, 2013 - 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 15 LOOCKERMAN PLAZA DOVER , DELAWARE OPEN FORUM - 15 MINUTES PRIOR TO OFFICIAL MEETING (7:15 P.M.) The “Open Forum” segment is provided to extend the opportunity to the general public to share their questions, thoughts, comments, concerns, and complaints. Discussion of any item appearing on the agenda as a public hearing is prohibited during the Open Forum as an opportunity will be provided during consideration of that item. Citizen comments are limited to three (3) minutes. Council is prohibited from taking action since they are not in official session; however, they may schedule such items as regular agenda items and act upon them in the future. INVOCATION BY DR. W. THOMAS MERCER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN LYNN AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS * CONSENT AGENDA Those items on the Council Agenda which are considered routine and non-controversial shall be marked with an asterisk (*) and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. * 1. Adoption of Minutes - Regular Council Meeting of February 25, 2013 2. Proclamation - Earth Hour (March 23, 2013 at 8:30 p.m.) 3. Presentation - Planning, Inspections, and Recreation Annual Report 4. Public Hearing - Proposed Resolution No. 2013-07 Approving Alley Abandonment (Paper) - 235 (Case), 239 (McCabe-Cort), and 243 (Marami Partners) Bayard Avenue 5. Public Hearing/Final Reading - Proposed Ordinance #2013-01 The First Reading of the following proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of January 28, 2013. Copies of the proposed ordinance are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers. A. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX B - ZONING , ARTICLE 3 - DISTRICT REGULATIONS, SECTION 22 - AIRPORT ENVIRONS OVERLAY ZONE (AEOZ)

Council Agenda - March 11, 2013 Page 2 6. Rezoning Request - Public Hearing/Final Reading of Proposed Ordinance #2013-02 The First Reading of the following proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of January 28, 2013. Copies of the proposed ordinance are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers. A. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE BOUNDARY OF THE AIRPORT ENVIRONS OVERLAY ZONE (AEOZ) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2010 AIR INSTALLATION COMPATIBLE USE ZONE (AICUZ) STUDY PUBLISHED BY THE DOVER AIR FORCE BASE 7. Utility Committee Report - February 25, 2013 * A. Annexation Request - 1174 S. Governors Avenue, Owned by Sipple's Used Cars, Inc. (Committee Recommended Annexation of the Property and Adoption of Resolution No. 2013-06 Setting the Annexation Referendum) B. Dedication of Rights-of-Way and Public Infrastructure b-1. The Village of Cannon Mill - Phase I (Committee Recommended Acceptance of Dedication of Rights-of-Way and Public Infrastructure in Phase I of the Village of Cannon Mill Subdivision, Including All of the Referenced Public Improvements)(Staff Recommends Deferring Action Until March 25, 2013) b-2. The Village of Westover - Phase VI (Committee Recommended Acceptance of Dedication of Rights-of-Way and Public Infrastructure in Phase VI of the Village of Westover Subdivision, Including All of the Referenced Public Improvements)(Staff Recommends Deferring Action Until March 25, 2013) * C. Update - Calpine (Committee Action Not Required for this Item) 8. Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report - February 25, 2013 A. Proposed Charter Amendments a-1. Article II - Mayor and Council, Section 13 - Vacancies; Forfeiture of Office; Filling of Vacancies (Committee Made No Recommendation) a-2. Article II - Mayor and Council, Section 5 - Council to Be Legislative Body; Size; Districts; Terms of Mayor and Councilmen; Qualifications (Committee Recommended Approval of the Proposed Charter Amendments and that a Resolution (No. 2013-09) Requesting the General Assembly to Amend the City of Dover Charter be Prepared for Council’s Review and Adoption) a-3. Article I - Powers of the City, Section 1.05 - Procedure to Extend Boundaries (Committee Recommended Approval of the Proposed Charter Amendments and that a Resolution (No. 2013-10) Requesting the General Assembly to Amend the City of Dover Charter be Prepared for Council’s Review and Adoption) * B. Disposal of Excess Property - Justice of the Peace (JP) Court 7 and 16 (Committee Recommended Authorizing the City Manager to Become a Co-Applicant With the State of Delaware on a Site Plan Application to Expand JP Court 7 and 16 Located at the Intersection of Bank Lane and West Street. Once the Amount of Land Necessary to Accommodate the Proposed Expansion is Known, the City Manager Will Return to the Committee with a Recommendation Regarding the Disposal of City Property Necessary to Accommodate the Proposed Expansion)

Council Agenda - March 11, 2013 Page 3 * 9. Monthly Reports - January 2013 A. Budget B. Chief of Police C. City Assessor D. City Manager E. City Planner F. Dover Fire Department G. Economic Development Office 10. Setting of Property Assessment Appeals (Staff Recommends May 20 - May 24, 2013 - 9:00 A.M. Until 4:00 P.M., May 28 - May 31, 2013 - 9:00 A.M. until 4:00 P.M., One Evening (If Needed). The Hearing Times Are Subject to Change) 11. Evaluation of Bids A. Cannon Mill Paving Improvements Program (Tabled by City Council During Their Regular Meeting of February 25, 2013) (Staff Recommended Awarding a Unit Price Contract for the Cannon Mill Paving Improvements Program to Harmony Construction Company Based on the Prevailing Wage Unit Prices for Each Work Item Submitted. The Total Work Authorized Under this Contract Will Not Exceed the Available Funding in Conjunction with the Co-Project FY 2013 Street and Alley Program)(Staff Recommends Deferring Action Until March 25, 2013) B. Change Order for NRG Sanitary Sewer Upgrade (Staff Recommends Approval of Change Order Request Submitted by Tri-State Grouting, LLC, in the Amount of $57,622) C. Mowing Contract (Staff Recommends Awarding a Mowing Contract to Priority Services LLC in the Amount of $32,820 for the CY 2013 Mowing Season) 12. Final Reading - Proposed Ordinance #2013-03 The First Reading of Proposed Ordinance #2013-03 was accomplished during the Council Meeting of February 25, 2013. Copies of the proposed ordinance are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers. A. Staff Substitute #1 for Ordinance #2013-03 - Amending Chapter 22 - Buildings and Building Regulations, Article XII - Vacant Buildings 13. Council Members Announcements /tm S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS\Council-Agendas\2013\03-11-2013.wpd THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING The Regular Council Meeting was held on February 25, 2013 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Leary presiding. Council members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Lynn, Mr. Perza, Mr. Bonar, Mrs. Williams, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Council staff members present were Police Chief Hosfelt, Mrs. Mitchell, Mrs. Townshend, Fire Chief West, Mr. Koenig, Deputy City Solicitor Pepper, and Mrs. McDowell. Mayor Carey was also present. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Leary declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council was not in official session and could not take formal action. There was no one present wishing to speak during the Open Forum. The invocation was given by Reverend Robert Appling of Victory Chapel Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Bonar and unanimously carried. Mr. Perza requested that Item #6A - Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Report of February 11, 2013 - Review of Revised Active Recreation Plan - Clearview Meadow, be removed from the Consent Agenda. Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Consent Agenda, as amended, seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 11, 2013 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 11, 2013 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Hare, seconded by Mrs. Williams and bore the written approval of Mayor Carey. CERTIFICATE OF CONGRATULATIONS - DOVER SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA 45TH YEAR ANNIVERSARY The following Certificate of Congratulations was read into the record by the City Clerk: WHEREAS, the Dover Symphony Orchestra is a landmark organization which, since its foundation in 1968, has strived to bring live performances of classical and orchestral music to the Dover and Central Delaware area, to further the musical arts generally and symphonic music particularly, to provide educational and performing opportunities for the citizens of Delaware and neighboring communities, and to encourage the interest of young people in orchestral music; and

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 2 WHEREAS, throughout its history, hundreds of dedicated musicians, from all walks of life, ranging from students to senior citizens and including professional musicians, music teachers, and amateur players, have committed countless volunteer hours to setting up, rehearsing, and performing with the Dover Symphony Orchestra; and WHEREAS, in 2013, the Dover Symphony Orchestra entered its 45th year of providing classical and popular music to Central Delaware. NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE, are privileged to present this Certificate of Congratulations to The Dover Symphony Orchestra In recognition of the celebration of its 45th anniversary and in appreciation for inspiring area musicians and audiences throughout the years. On behalf of the Mayor and City Council, Mayor Carey presented the Certificate to Donald Buxton - Conductor, Nancy Pikulik - President, and Cynthia Witt - Business Manager. Ms. Pikulik, on behalf of the Dover Symphony Orchestra, thanked members for the recognition. PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS WEEK The City Clerk read the following Proclamation into the record: WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) are continuing their partnership to increase awareness of the dangers posed by severe weather and the steps that can be taken to prepare for hazardous storms; and WHEREAS, in 2012 there were more than 450 weather-related fatalities and nearly 2,600 injuries, despite advance warning; and WHEREAS, the 2013 National Severe Weather Preparedness Week theme, "Be a Force of Nature," promotes a nationwide effort to raise public awareness of the importance of preparation in preventing the injuries that often occur during severe weather events. NOW, THEREFORE, I, CARLETON E. CAREY, SR., MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, do hereby proclaim the week of March 3-9, 2013, as NATIONAL SEVERE WEATHER PREPAREDNESS WEEK in the City of Dover and encourage all individuals, families, and businesses in the Dover community to take the time to become educated on measures that can be taken to prepare for weather-related emergencies. HEARING/VIOLATION OF DANGEROUS BUILDING ORDINANCE - 416 WEST DIVISION STREET, OWNED BY THE ESTATE OF EVELYN WATSON A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider a violation of the Dangerous Building Ordinance at 416 West Division Street, owned by the Estate of Evelyn Watson. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, explained that the property was a two (2) story, wood-framed, single family home. The house had been vacant since August 2010 and was boarded by City crews in December 2010. Boards had been removed in the past and windows had been broken. The property had been re-secured by City staff. There were numerous code violations existing on the property.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 3 Mrs. Townshend reviewed a presentation depicting the condition of the structure (Exhibit #1). Staff recommended that City Council take the following action for property located at 416 West Division Street: 1) Declare this building and all accessory structures on this property dangerous. 2) Order the property repaired or demolished by March 25, 2013 by the owner or equity owner at their own risk. 3) Order the Building Inspector to cause the repair or demolition of the structures if not completed by the owner within 10 days of the date established by City Council. 4) Order the City Manager, with the assistance of the City Solicitor, to cause the cost of repairs or demolition to be charged against the land on which the building exists as a municipal lien or cause such cost to be added to the tax duplicate as an assessment, or to be levied as a special tax, or to be recovered in a suit at law against the owner. Council President Leary declared the public hearing open and, there being no one present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Hutchison moved that the structure located at 416 West Division Street be declared a dangerous building and ordered that the property be demolished or repaired by March 25, 2013 in accordance with the process recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. PRESENTATION - FIRE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT Former Fire Chief Jack Fortney reviewed the 2012 Fire Department Annual Report. He noted that the two (2) busiest months were April, with 98 incidents, and October, with 94 incidents. The slowest months were January and September, with 72 incidents each month. Chief Fortney stated that the Department averages two (2) runs per day. In response to Mr. Hutchison, Chief Fortney stated that most of the calls that the Department responds to are false alarms. Mr. Anderson noted that 1,670 man hours were spent for fires and 1,640 man hours were spent on false alarms. Chief Fortney responded that the Fire Department and the Fire Marshal’s Office were doing what they could to deter false alarms. Members relayed their appreciation for the Fire Department’s service to the City. Mr. Bonar moved for acceptance of the Fire Department Annual Report, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and unanimously carried. PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT - FEBRUARY 11, 2013 The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee met on February 11, 2013 with Chairman Bonar presiding. Mr. Anderson requested the addition of Item #5A- Public Comments on Recreation Issues.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 4 Review of Revised Active Recreation Plan - Clearview Meadow Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, reviewed detailed information regarding a revised Active Recreation Plan for Clearview Meadow. She noted that Clearview Meadow is a Planned Neighborhood Development (PND), consisting of 88.2524+/- acres, located north of South Little Creek Road, south of North Little Creek Road, and east of Babb Drive. She stated that a 6.8429 acre Active Recreation Area was initially shown, including a walking path system, play structure, swings, tennis court, picnic tables, and benches. This active recreational component was reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission on July 27, 2004. A Revised Recreation Plan #1 was reviewed by the Parks, Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee on November 9, 2004 and received Planning Commission approval on December 20, 2004. She noted that the Revised Recreation Plan #1 involved the elimination of the tennis court and the addition of a swimming pool and bath house facility with an associated parking lot. The playground equipment was also relocated in this redesign. Mrs. Townshend advised members that the Concept Plan for Clearview Meadow PND received Planning Commission approval on April 19, 2004 and the Preliminary Subdivision Plan received conditional approval from the Planning Commission on September 20, 2004. The Record Plan for the Subdivision was recorded on September 30, 2005 and the Final Construction Plans were approved January 19, 2006. The development, as approved, consists of the following: 167 single family detached homes, 48 duplexes, and 88 townhouses for a total of 303 dwelling units. The initial phases of construction and home building focused on the southern portion of the subdivision along the streets of Mer Way, Lady Bug Drive, and Nob Hill Road. Access into the subdivision is provided by John Hunn Brown Boulevard and Babb Drive. Currently, there are 26 duplex units, 35 townhouse units, and two (2) single-family detached units complete (63 units complete); two (2) duplex units under construction; and one (1) single-family detached home in permit review. Mrs. Townshend explained that, due to the economy, progress on this development ceased; however, it has recently been purchased by a new developer, Shirliz LLC c/o Knollwood Development Corporation, who has submitted the Revised Active Recreation Plan #2. Mrs. Townshend indicated that the applicant has proposed several revisions to the Active Recreation Area of the subdivision, which includes 6.5624 acres of land to be reserved as Active Recreation Area, creating a park area centrally located in the subdivision. The revision proposes the elimination of the swimming pool and bathhouse building, relocation of the gazebo, and the addition of a community building with parking lot; a play area that contains a swing set and a play structure and series of benches and picnic tables remain throughout the site. She stated that the amenities are connected by a walking path system that is five (5) feet in width and constructed of bituminous asphalt and a large lawn area is central to the recreation area. With regard to the community building, Mrs. Townshend stated that the architecture and floor plan submitted indicate a one (1) story building with a front entry porch. The exterior finish materials appear to be a horizontal siding, a shake style shingle in the gables, and a gable roof. The interior includes an exercise room, a small meeting (card/game) room, and a large meeting room, along with restroom facilities, storage, and a small kitchen. The plan also depicts a 15-space parking lot to be

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 5 located in front of the building. She reviewed information from the submitted Plan (last updated January 22, 2013) for the Revised Active Recreation Area #2 to be constructed, as follows: Required Provided on Plan Active Recreation Area 275 S.F. per dwelling unit or Community building, gazebo, (Article 5 §10.16) 0.5 acre, greater thereof lawn area, walking paths, and 305 DU = 83,875 S.F. playground area = Total of (1.925 ac) 6.5624 acres Requires 1.925 acres Active Recreation Amenities Accessible Centrally located in the (Article 5 §10.15) development. Access to all residential lots via the walking paths and sidewalk network. Accessible access to the community building is unclear. Parking lot provides one handicapped accessible parking space. Active Recreation Amenities Age Oriented to development Community Building (Article 5 §10.15) Playground Area Equipment Gazebo Benches & Picnic Tables Walking path Parking Off-street parking provided for each dwelling unit on the individual lots with street frontage sidewalks to recreation areas. A parking lot with 15 spaces is also located on the south side of the Community Building. Setbacks: 30 feet from Community Building and residential lots and 25 feet from Gazebo locations are in right-of-way for street compliance with the setbacks as required. Landscaping The Revised Active Recreation Plan #2 shows trees and landscaping around the site. Staff submitted the following comments and recommendations regarding the Active Recreation Area to be constructed: 1) The proposed plan meets the area requirements for the Active Recreation Area. The plan is required to provide 1.925 acres of Active Recreation Area and it is proposing 6.5624 acres of Active Recreation Area.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 6 2) Staff recommends approval of the Community Building, Gazebo, the swing set and the playground area, walking path, and site furnishings with comments and conditions provided below. 3) The following items should be included on the Plan to clarify the construction of the recreation area improvements: a) Provide lighting around the Active Recreation Areas. b) Lawn areas shall be appropriate planted (seeded or sodded) a maintained for active recreation activities. c) Clarify the total square footage of the Community Building. d) Provide bike racks near the Community Building. e) Identify utility service connections to the Community Building. f) Identify the phasing for the construction of the Active Recreation Area with relation to the building construction phasing to ensure that the development of the Active Recreation amenities keeps pace with the building construction. 4) The Community Building must include an accessible entrance route for entry into the building. Currently, the front porch is elevated several steps with no ramp system depicted. 5) Ensure barrier free access is provided at all intersections of drive lanes and sidewalks including the entrance to the parking lot for active recreation area. 6) Ensure that tree planting locations do not conflict with utility lines or locations. 7) The community building must comply with the building and fire code requirements. 8) The applicant is reminded of the requirements for construction phasing of the recreation area as associated with the development of the residential units. The 17,325 S.F. of recreation area for the residential units constructed to date (275 S.F. x 63 dwelling units) is being met by several open lawn areas in the vicinity of John Hunn Brown Boulevard. (a) Article 5 §10.6 Construction Phasing. The recreation and open space areas shall be completed in a proportion equal to or greater than the proportion of residential dwelling units completed, except that one hundred (100) percent of the recreation and open space areas shall be completed prior to issuing building permits for the final twenty (20) percent of the dwelling units proposed. Building permits shall not be issued for dwelling units unless the requirements of this section are met. 9) There shall be provisions which ensure that the common open space land (including active recreation area) shall continue as such and be properly managed and maintained.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 7 10) In the event, that major changes and revisions to the Plan occur in the finalization of the Revised Recreation Plan and associated Minor Subdivision Plan contact the Department of Planning and Inspections. Examples include reorientation of elements, relocation of site components, etc. These changes may require resubmittal for review by the Development Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, or other agencies and commissions making recommendations in regards to the plan. 11) The applicant/developer shall be aware that prior to any ground disturbing activities on the site the appropriate site inspections and permits are required. The applicant shall be aware that Recreation Plan approval does not represent a Building Permit and associated construction activity permits. A separate application process is required for issuance of a Building Permit from the City of Dover. 12) Construction may have an effect on the adjacent property owners and nearby travel lanes. Any work requiring the closing or rerouting of traffic should be coordinated as to offer the least amount of inconvenience. The Committee recommended acceptance of the Revised Active Recreation Area Plan #2 for Clearview Meadow, as presented and with the inclusion of staff’s comments and recommendations. During the City Council meeting, Mrs. Townshend advised members that the developer proposed to amend the Active Recreation Area Plan by replacing the previously proposed pool with a community center. She noted that staff was supportive of the amendment. Mrs. Townshend indicated that some of the residents had since expressed concern with the elimination of the proposed pool. Those residents had been advised to attend the Planning Commission meeting to express their concerns. Responding to Mr. Perza, Mrs. Townshend clarified that the Committee’s recommendation for approval was based on the plan meeting all of the City’s Code requirements and was not necessarily an endorsement. She noted that the residents of Clearview Meadow would have an opportunity to express their concerns at the Planning Commission meeting prior to final action on the plan and that public notice would be provided. Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Dixon and unanimously carried. Overview of Recreation Fees and Proposal for Open Gym Fees for Non-Residents of Dover Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, introduced Mr. Wayne Voshell, Manager of the John W. Pitts Recreation Center. She advised members that the City of Dover’s Recreation Division offers a variety of programs that are supported by fees, including participation fees for recreation programs, fitness classes, and sports leagues; field rental fees for use of multipurpose and softball fields and park pavilions; and rental fees for use of the Pitts Center Gym and multi-purpose room. She explained that fees for program participation are set based on the program and are advertised in the program guide. Members reviewed the Recreation Department Fields, Parks & Pavilion Rental Rates.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 8 Mrs. Townshend advised members that, in evaluating the fee structure to improve cost recovery associated with recreation programming, staff developed a proposal to charge fees to non-residents of Dover for participation in Open Gym. Based on data regarding non-resident participants in Open Gym, staff estimated that the new fee would generate approximately $5,000 annually. This would account for an increase in the Recreation Division’s revenue of approximately four (4) percent (4%). Mrs. Townshend stated that since the Recreation Division is a General Fund Department, which is supported by tax revenue, a modest fee for non-residents to participate in Open Gym was an issue of equity. She assured members that the purpose of the proposed fees was for cost recovery and not to make a profit. Mrs. Townshend stated that demographic information from users (obtained from Open Gym card applications) indicated that non-resident users are from Camden, Clayton, Felton, Magnolia, Milford, and Smyrna and the majority reside in more affluent developments such as Cardinal Hills, Old Mill Acres, St. Jones Commons, etc. She noted that there are some users from General’s Green, Capital Park, and Rodney Village, which are considered low-income areas. She assured members that staff was sensitive to the economic issue and did not want to adversely impact a community that needs recreation and may be unable to afford such a fee. Staff recommended approval of the Open Gym Fees, as proposed. Mr. Voshell advised members that he had not discovered another similar facility in the State of Delaware that provides an Open Gym Program like the City of Dover’s or that offers the number of hours available for the gym. He stated that all such facilities are fee based, including the Boys and Girls Club. In response to Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Townshend reminded members that the contribution provided by Kent County was granted as a capital investment for the facility. Noting that County residents are able to participate in the City leagues, classes, or any other program held at the Pitts Center for the same fees as City residents, she felt that the County was provided a value for their investment. Noting that senior citizens would be exempted, Mr. Anderson suggested that individuals who are Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) recipients, who wish to disclose such information, also be provided an exemption. Mrs. Townshend referred to the City’s Super Summer Playground Program that has been offered for several years at a minimal fee of $150 for the six (6) weeks of camp. In reviewing the costs versus the revenue for the program, she stated that the City has been realizing a $12,000 deficit. Of the 40 participants, she stated that 22 were out of City and all participants were from suburban, middle-class families. She noted that the program had been restructured to run the entire time school is closed during the summer. In order to break even, she stated that the fee must be $75-$80 per week; therefore, the fee has been set for $80 per week, with a discounted rate of $75 for siblings. If a participant is registered for more than one (1) week, the fee after the first $80 would be $75. In addition, extended hours will be offered at an additional charge for those parents who rely on day camp programs to provide their child care. Mrs. Townshend stated that the increase in fees will allow the City to cover the costs, explaining her feeling that the City should not be subsidizing child care for middle-class families who do not live in the City.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 9 Responding to Mr. Bonar, Mrs. Townshend stated that staff did not perform a comparison with the YMCA since their programs are based on memberships; however, she stated that the City’s Summer Camp was half the cost (with the increase) of the program offered by Delaware Technical and Community College. The Committee recommended approval of staff’s proposal for Open Gym fees for non-residents of Dover, with the stipulation that staff establishes a scholarship for people who are eligible for Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) for use of the Open Gym period. During the City Council meeting, Mrs. Townshend reviewed the Overview of Recreation Fees and Proposal for Open Gym Fees for Non-Residents of Dover. She noted that the open gym participants who are not residents of the City are mainly residents of Camden, Clayton, Felton, Magnolia, Wyoming, Smyrna, Wilmington, Frederica, and the Winding Ridge, Cardinal Hills, Derbywood, Rodney Village, Capital Park, and Generals Green developments. Mrs. Townshend pointed out that these areas represent a broad economic spectrum of users. She reminded members that the Committee had recommended waiving the fee for participants who are eligible for Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT). Mrs. Townshend reviewed Recreation Trends for Fiscal Years 2012-2013, which was updated with current numbers (Exhibit #2). She noted that recreation revenues dropped almost 27% between 2008 and 2012 and the expenses were increasing. Mrs. Townshend noted that the 2012 figures included the retirement payout to the previous director and 2013 reflected a decreased expenditure due to the unfilled position. She stated that her goal was to find ways of covering the cost of the programs. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mrs. Townshend stated that she did not think that the development of the Kent County Sports Complex would have a significant impact on revenue since it will cater to regional tournament sports. Currently, there is more demand for City field space for soccer and lacrosse groups than can be accommodated. Mrs. Townshend stated that she is new to the department and could not determine the reason for the fluctuation in revenue over the years. Mr. Lynn expressed concern with charging what he believed to be the most vulnerable citizens - the elderly and the youth of Capital Park, Generals Green, and Rodney Village - for use of the open gym. He felt that involvement with athletics was a positive activity which would keep the youth out of trouble and that $5,000 in revenue would not offset the benefits that would be eliminated. Mr. Lynn felt that the stigma associated with EBT would prohibit many from disclosing their status for exemption from the fee. He also noted that there were many working poor families who were not eligible for those benefits but did not have the disposable income to pay for the use of the Pitts Center. Noting that Kent County helped pay for the Center, Mr. Lynn felt it was inequitable to deny County residents the opportunity to use the facility. Mrs. Townshend stated that senior citizens would be exempt regardless of their residency. Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hare.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 10 Mr. Anderson noted that program fees had not increased in many years and many of the participants do not pay City taxes. Mr. Hare suggested that the County’s initial contribution may have exhausted itself by now and they may be willing to make an additional donation to help cover operating expenses. At that time, the fee for non-residents could be reconsidered. Mrs. Townshend compared this fee with the fee that the City previously charged non-residents for use of the Library. Eventually, a reciprocal borrowing agreement was developed for Library patrons. Responding to Mr. Lynn, Chief Hosfelt stated that he did not have the data to support a relationship between imposing a fee and an increase in youth-related crime. The motion to approve staff's proposal for Open Gym fees for non-residents of Dover, with the stipulation that staff establishes a scholarship for people who are eligible for Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) for use of the Open Gym period, was carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes (Mr. Perza, Mr. Bonar, Mrs. Williams, Mr. Hare, Mr. Hutchison, and Mr. Leary) and three (3) no (Mr. Anderson, Mr. Dixon, and Mr. Lynn). Planning for Affordable Housing and Homelessness Referring to the need for affordable housing and the need to address homelessness, Mr. Anderson relayed appreciation for the beginning of a State charrette on this issue and to members of City Council and the Mayor for their efforts in this regard. However, he suggested that as the City of Dover plans for the future, all citizens should be given consideration. In order to do this, he suggested that there must be an understanding of what occurs on a daily basis in the City. Mr. Anderson noted that although the Dover Interfaith Mission for Housing had no representative present to address members, he invited others, as follows: Ms. Manivanh Johnson, President of Open Doors Ministry (6284 West Denneys Road); Mr. Mike Rowe, Program Director for the Veterans Outreach Program at People’s Place in Milford (1129 Airport Road, Milford); and Ms. Vickie Bryant, Support Services for Veterans’ Families at People’s Place in Milford. Ms. Johnson explained the issues involving homelessness and needy families in the City of Dover and surrounding communities and advised members that she spends a great deal of time with the homeless. She advised members that during the past year, Open Doors Ministry distributed over 400 backpacks filled with essentials to the homeless and needy families, as well as approximately 50 sleeping bags during the past winter. She advised members that Open Doors Ministry also provides clothing, bus tickets, food vouchers, utility bill assistance, etc. She requested the City’s assistance in relaying these needs to the community. Concurring with Mr. Bonar, Mr. Rowe stated that although the agency is out of Milford, it covers both Kent and Sussex Counties and noted that there is a shelter on College Road in Dover. He explained that one of the big problems with the homeless is that they do not know where to go for assistance, although there are resources available. He suggested that the City of Dover hold a networking event attended by the various agencies. This could be accomplished at no cost to the

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 11 taxpayers, since sponsors would be obtained by his and other similar agencies and could be held at a place such as the Modern Maturity Center. The doors would be opened to the homeless so that they could receive direction for assistance, and this would also allow the agencies to network together in an attempt to better serve the homeless. Mr. Rowe advised members that People’s Place also assists individuals with utility bills, rent, security deposits, etc. It also offers a new program that will assist veterans and their families by offering temporary financial assistance to keep them from losing their rental homes, provide security deposits, or assist with utility bills. Mr. Rowe explained that many of the homeless are accustomed to living on the streets and, when provided assistance, will return to being homeless by choice. However, he shared success stories where assistance was provided and within a few months, these individuals obtained housing on their own. Mr. Bonar noted that although there is a directory of the various social services and community action agencies in existence, it does not provide financial criteria, updated telephone numbers, etc. He suggested that there be a concerted effort among State, County, and local governments and utility companies to compile this information to be provided to each governmental agency and service provider. This would provide a means of providing individual direction to those who meet various criteria. Mr. Bonar felt that it would behoove service providers to put together an organization to assist in developing a directory with the information to be made available to all those who wish to render such services. Concurring with Mr. Bonar, Ms. Bryant indicated that she had been in contact with veterans who were very disgruntled. She stated that, along with assistance, there must be some type of sustainable income so that if a program is able to help, there would not be a need for such help month after month. She explained that there are not adequate funds or resources to help everyone on a daily basis. Ms. Bryant advised members that it is difficult to know where to refer unemployed veterans for assistance. Mr. Anderson relayed appreciation for the work done by the individuals who addressed members and their organizations. Noting that the State paid $2M for hotels to house homeless families, Mr. Anderson inquired about the demographics of the homeless and whether it is easier or more difficult to find resources to help men, women, or families, etc. Responding, Ms. Johnson stated that the majority of those she comes in contact with are individuals and that they seem to be the hardest to provide assistance for. Mr. Rowe stated that his agency’s demographics fall in line with the national average in Delaware. Although veterans are less than 10% of the nation’s population, he noted that 30% of all homeless people are veterans, 45% of whom are Vietnam veterans. Of this 45%, he stated that 10% are women. Since there are many more service women today than in previous years, he felt that statistics for female homeless veterans would increase in the future.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 12 Mr. Anderson noted that Mr. Herb Konowitz, Interfaith Mission for Housing (who was unable to attend the meeting) had requested that he advise members regarding a problem with individuals who are being discharged from institutions such as hospitals, behavioral centers, and prisons to “nowhere,” with no transitional assistance provided. There was no action taken by the Committee on this matter. Semi-Annual Review - Statistics Regarding Jobs and Businesses Gained and Lost in the City of Dover Since July 2012 Mr. William Neaton, Economic Development Director, reviewed the semi-annual report of employment statistics on the 14 largest employers in the Dover area and reminded members that this information is updated and presented to members on a semi-annual basis. The report provided statistics regarding jobs and businesses gained and lost in the City of Dover since July 2012. Prefacing his comments, Mr. Neaton noted that there was a very positive feeling among those who attended the unveiling of the Kent County Profile a few weeks ago. He stated that over $1 billion in construction projects are occurring in Kent County and around the City of Dover. He felt confident that the statistics provided in the report were an indication of this positive movement. Mr. Bonar advised members that in the next six (6) weeks, approximately 300 jobs would start up within the City limits as a result of the efforts of Mr. Neaton. Responding, Mr. Neaton stated that a meeting was scheduled for next Tuesday (February 19th) with the contractor for this $3-$4M project. The primary purpose of the meeting would be to emphasize the importance of keeping as many jobs local as possible. Referring to the decrease in permanent employees for the Hotel and Casino at Dover Downs, Mr. Neaton stated that several surrounding states had approved legalized gambling, which was impacting Dover Downs and was reflected in the decrease in these employees. However, he noted that with the expansion of Kool-Aid operations, there would be 29 additional jobs at Kraft Foods. Also, he reminded members that ILC would be expanding, although Dover was not selected for the new location. He explained that ILC was able to purchase a facility in Sussex County for approximately half the cost of locating in Dover. Mr. Bonar noted that several large commercial buildings remain vacant in the City of Dover. He suggested that the landlords reduce rental fees to attract businesses to Dover. He indicated that if Council action were necessary, such as a reduction in a tax rate, he would support those efforts. Mr. Anderson stated that several businesses that recently opened in the downtown area remain in business. He suggested that staff develop an informational brochure explaining the services provided. He also suggested that when a business license is obtained, staff request contact information from the new business to forward to the Economic Development Office. Mr. Neaton advised members that when a new business begins, the Economic Development Office makes sure that there is a viable business plan and the resources to start up. He felt that this has helped in the success of businesses.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 13 Mr. Neaton informed members that he attends the “Kent is Open For Business” meeting held on the first Thursday morning of every month, which he felt was a great resource for any new business. He stated that at one time there were nine (9) individuals attending who were planning to start new businesses; however, recently the number of attendees had declined. The participants at the last meeting decided to make changes in order to attract more participants, such as increasing marketing, providing a guest speaker every month, etc. He assured members that efforts have been made to provide more resources for smaller businesses to become more successful. Responding to Mr. Bonar, Mr. Neaton stated that although he does not attend the Statewide Chamber of Commerce meetings, he does attend the Delawareans for Environmental and Economic Development (DEED) meetings, Committee of 100 meetings, etc., and that he just met with the new Economic Development Director from the City of Wilmington. Referring to the Committee of 100 Meetings, he stated that Dover will be hosting the next meeting. Committee action was not required on this matter. Update - CDBG Program Mrs. Tracey Harvey, Planner I, reviewed the Status of FY-12 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Projects - February 2013. She advised members that Habitat for Humanity is presently under contract for a Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) property, with the closing scheduled for Friday, February 15th. Public Comments on Recreation Issues Mr. Anderson explained that he had requested public comments on recreation issues to consider youth programs and other ideas for the future of youth and other community programs. Dr. Kim Warfield, 1403 Windmill Drive, advised members that she is the founder and CEO of the Delaware Minority Outreach. She explained that, as a retired New York City police detective, she had witnessed many young women and men get into criminal activity. She stated that the Outreach serves low-income communities and that the parents in these communities are often in prison, on welfare, etc. The Outreach was created with the anticipation of stopping criminal activity in the low- income communities. She explained the various programs provided, one (1) of which is the Cadet Corps which teaches discipline, how to exercise, how to disarm people with guns in school, how to eat properly, etc. Dr. Warfield indicated that the Outreach had partnered with other organizations within the City of Dover and participates in their programs, such as the Exploring Program with the Boy Scouts. She noted that the Delaware State Police is very involved in the Exploring Program. Dr. Warfield explained that youth initially become involved in criminal activity because they have no place to go and need someone to care about them. She stated that the Outreach is in need of more space and noted that the Dover Park Recreation building was vacant and that her organization would like to utilize the facility, since it has a football field, basketball court, etc.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 14 Mr. Bonar reminded members that there were issues with the building and that it was currently being reviewed to determine what renovations might be necessary. Once this information is provided and the cost for the renovations is known, he stated that the City would be in a position to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) so that bids for the facility could be submitted. Mr. Bonar moved for acceptance of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT - FEBRUARY 11, 2013 The Utility Committee met on February 11, 2013 with Chairman Bonar presiding. Request for Alley Abandonment (Paper) - 235 (Case), 239 (McCabe-Cort), and 243 (Marami Partners) Bayard Avenue A request was received from Ms. Joan Case for the abandonment of an alley located behind her property on Bayard Avenue. A letter was subsequently sent to all adjacent property owners to determine their interest in participating in the abandonment and having a portion of the alley conveyed to them. Two (2) additional property owners expressed interest in participating. The names of interested property owners and the addresses of their affected properties are as follows: 1) Ms. Joan Case - 235 Bayard Avenue; 2) Ms. Claudia McCabe-Cort - 239 Bayard Avenue; and 3) Marami Partners - 243 Bayard Avenue. Members reviewed a map of the area and a list of adjacent property owners. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, assured members that staff has confirmed that the alley is unimproved and considered to be a “paper” alley. He noted that electric utility infrastructure and storm drainage infrastructure are located within the alley; therefore, public utility easements will be required. Since the alley is 14 feet wide, half of the alley or seven (7) feet, would be conveyed to the requesting parties. Staff recommended conveyance of seven (7) feet of said alley to only 235, 239 and 243 Bayard Avenue and in conjunction with the provision of a public utility easement for each parcel. Conveyance would be in proportions complimentary to the existing lot widths of these parcels. Should members favor approval of the request, staff recommended: 1) abandonment of the subject alley with conveyance of seven feet (7’) of said alley to 235, 239 and 243 Bayard Avenue, currently owned by Ms. Joan Case, Ms. Claudia McCabe-Cort and Marami Partners, respectively, in conjunction with the provision of a public utility easement for each parcel; and 2) adoption of a resolution by Council setting a public hearing regarding the proposed abandonment for March 11, 2013. (City Clerk’s Office Note: In accordance with the City’s Procedure for Alley Abandonments, a Resolution setting the Public Hearing will be presented to Council for consideration for adoption.) Responding to Mr. Perza, Mr. Koenig explained that the remaining adjacent property owners had no interest in the additional property and if the City were to abandon the property, these owners would not maintain the property, which would create problems for the City. Should any of these property owners desire the property in the future, they would need to submit a request to the City and the same procedure would be followed.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 15 The Committee recommended approval of staff’s recommendation to abandon the subject alley with conveyance of seven feet (7') of said alley to 235, 239 and 243 Bayard Avenue, currently owned by Ms. Joan Case, Ms. Claudia McCabe-Cort and Marami Partners, respectively, in conjunction with the provision of a public utility easement for each parcel; and for the adoption of a Resolution setting a public hearing for March 11, 2013 at 7:30 p.m. regarding the proposed abandonment. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Williams and, by a unanimous roll call vote, Resolution No. 2013-05 was adopted, as follows: A RESOLUTION PROPOSING THE VACATING AND ABANDONMENT OF A CERTAIN ALLEY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DOVER. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: Section 1. The Council of the City of Dover favors the vacating and abandonment of the following portions of an alley: Adjacent to 235 Bayard Avenue (ED-05-077.06-01-84.00) Being a portion of that certain piece or parcel of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware, being an unimproved public alley running in a north to south direction, located to the east of Bayard Avenue, said portion of alley beginning at a point identified as the northeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-84.00; thence running with Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-84.00 South 22 degrees 11 minutes East 60.01 feet along the westerly line of the 14' wide alley to the northeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-85.00; thence running North 68 degrees 53 minutes East 7 feet crossing into said 14' wide alley to a point in the center of the alley, opposite the northeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-85.00; thence running North 22 degrees 11 minutes West 60.01 feet parallel to the westerly line of the 14' wide alley to a point; thence running South 68 degrees 53 minutes West 7 feet to the westerly side of the 14' wide alley, being the point and place of beginning and containing 0.0096 acres (420 square feet) of land be the same more or less. The above described parcel of land shall be considered a public utility easement, reserving the rights of the City of Dover, their agents or assigns to free access for ingress and egress to these premises and every part thereof at all times for purpose of installing, maintaining and operating its existing public utilities. Adjacent to 239 Bayard Avenue (ED-05-077.06-01-85.00) Being a portion of that certain piece or parcel of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware, being an unimproved public alley running in a north to south direction, located to the east of Bayard Avenue, said portion of alley beginning at a point identified as the northeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-85.00; thence running with Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-85.00 South 22 degrees 11 minutes East 60.01 feet along the westerly line of the 14' wide

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 16 alley to the northeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-86.00; thence running North 68 degrees 53 minutes East 7 feet crossing into said 14' wide alley to a point in the center of the alley, opposite the northeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-86.00; thence running North 22 degrees 11 minutes West 60.01 feet parallel to the westerly line of the 14' wide alley to a point; thence running South 68 degrees 53 minutes West 7 feet to the westerly side of the 14' wide alley, being the point and place of beginning and containing 0.0096 acres (420 square feet) of land be the same more or less. The above described parcel of land shall be considered a public utility easement, reserving the rights of the City of Dover, their agents or assigns to free access for ingress and egress to these premises and every part thereof at all times for purpose of installing, maintaining and operating its existing public utilities. Adjacent to 243 Bayard Avenue (ED-05-077.06-01-86.00) Being a portion of that certain piece or parcel of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware, being an unimproved public alley running in a north to south direction, located to the east of Bayard Avenue, said portion of alley beginning at a point identified as the northeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-86.00; thence running with Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-86.00 South 22 degrees 11 minutes East 68 feet along the westerly line of the 14' wide alley to the southeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-86.00 being the southeast terminus of the 14' wide alley; thence running North 55 degrees 29 minutes 31 seconds East 7.2 feet crossing into said 14' wide alley to a point in the center of the alley, opposite the southeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-86.00; thence running North 22 degrees 11 minutes West 66.3 feet parallel to the westerly line of the 14' wide alley to a point; thence running South 68 degrees 53 minutes West 7 feet to the westerly side of the 14' wide alley, being the point and place of beginning and containing 0.0108 acres (470.15 square feet) of land be the same more or less. The above described parcel of land shall be considered a public utility easement, reserving the rights of the City of Dover, their agents or assigns to free access for ingress and egress to these premises and every part thereof at all times for purpose of installing, maintaining and operating its existing public utilities. Section 2. The Council of the City of Dover will sit on Monday, March 11, 2013, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers at City Hall, Dover, Delaware, to hear the objections of such residents of the City or owners of the property affected as shall attend, in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of the Charter of the City of Dover (Chapter 158, Volume 36, Laws of Delaware). Section 3. The Clerk of Council is hereby directed to post copies of this Resolution in five or more public places in the City of Dover. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 25, 2013

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 17 Quarterly Review of Utility Related Capital Investment Plan (CIP) (Electric and Water/Wastewater) (October, November, and December) Members were provided a Project Tracking Report, as of December 31, 2012, for the Utility (Electric and Water/Wastewater) Related Capital Investment Plan (CIP). Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that several projects were underway and noted that City Council would be considering Engineering Service Agreements as well as the Street Program. Although departments were working with limited staff, he stated that most projects were moving forward and assured members that staff was working hard to keep the CIP on track. TEA/NAES Report (November) Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed the TEA/NAES Monthly Report for November 2012 and reminded members that staff reviews this report with TEA on a monthly basis. The report is provided to allow for the monitoring of electric sales and revenues received, which will provide a better understanding of any fluctuations that occur and allow the opportunity to make improvements if deemed necessary. Referring to Power Supply costs, Mr. Koenig noted that the City was running below budget on costs, which had been consistent for several months. In response to Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Koenig stated that although there was a time when the City bought hedge energy five (5) years in advance, this had been reduced to a three (3) year horizon. Looking out three (3) years, he stated that the City was hedged approximately 50%. The portfolio had been pulled back somewhat on hedge transactions because the City was trying to take advantage of low market conditions; therefore, the target for the current year was to hedge approximately 80% of the Power Purchase and buy the remaining 20% in the spot market. He noted that this approach had worked well under the current operating conditions. The Committee recommended acceptance of the TEA/NAES Monthly Report for November 2012. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. UPDATES Members were provided the following updates: Green Energy Funding and Programming Members reviewed an update on the Green Energy Funding and Programming. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that there were still customers on the waiting list for reimbursement and that the City had reopened the grant applications; however, the City was not receiving a continuous supply of applications.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 18 National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, stated that staff was continuing to work on activities related to the permit and utilizing the intern from Wesley College to assist with the permit requirements. Within the last week, staff provided businesses information on how to maintain their stormwater areas, which was well received and has started a dialogue. Mrs. Townshend stated that the City’s Annual Report will be submitted to the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) within the next two (2) weeks. The current challenge was that there were staff vacancies at DNREC for employees who oversee the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program. Solar Park Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, noted that members were provided details of the Electric Revenue Fund, Electric Supply & Generation - Cost per MWh by supply source for FY 2013 by Month. He reminded members that this information was being provided in response to Mr. Blakeman’s questions during a previous meeting regarding the amount the City is receiving and paying in regard to solar energy. Mr. Koenig referenced the bar chart provided and explained that it depicts the City’s costs per MWh for the current fiscal year. Responding to Mr. Hare, Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, explained that the spreadsheet provided total power supply and generation numbers and combined them to show the net. The chart showed the cost per MWh by source of supply. She stated that the spreadsheet provided figures for each source of supply, including the net, as well as the total power supply and plant costs. Referring to the report, she noted that the total power supply and plant cost was $28,109,056. Of that amount, $728,272 was for the Sun Park - Energy and $157,894 is for the Sun Park - Renewable Energy Credits (RECs). She explained that the City was making money on the plant itself, not on the cost of supply for the Sun Park, but by generating (capacity credits), as well as spot market energy that was sold when the plant was run. Mrs. Mitchell also noted that the Generation Credit was $5,662,597 and the Supply was $33,771,653 with all power supply included; however, the PJM capacity load was $5,640,726, which would be higher if the City did not have the capacity credit in the amount of $7,158,061. She explained that the difference between the $7,158,061 and $5,640,726 was the margin the City is making on having the plant run. Mr. Hare questioned if the City was making approximately $2M on the Solar Park. Responding, Mrs. Mitchell stated that the Solar Park continues to cost more per MWh and was not helping with the load. As requested by Mr. Hare, Mrs. Mitchell reiterated that the cost of the Solar Park was reflected in “Dover Sun Park - Energy,” which totaled $728,272 and “Dover Sun Park - REC, which totaled $157,894. Mr. Bonar reminded members that the Solar Park was the result of a legislative mandate which required the City to provide renewable energy credits and renewable energy resources. In regard to the cost of the Solar Park, Mr. Koenig explained that this would be the amount that is paid to LS Power less what is collected for the power. At this point, there was no report that netted these two (2) amounts. Responding, Mr. Hare requested that a simple report be provided to members detailing this information.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 19 Calpine Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, indicated that the Calpine Project continued to move forward and that City staff was holding weekly conference calls with principals of the projects. Additional staff meetings were being conducted to address infrastructure issues. Staff was anticipating the issuance of a building permit and for earth moving to occur within the next 45-60 days and was working on milestones to meet the demands of the Calpine Project. To his knowledge, Calpine’s air permit had been issued and they were continuing to work on obtaining stormwater management and other administrative approvals necessary for a spring start. He anticipated construction to begin April 1, 2013. Mr. Bonar advised members that staff, along with some members of City Council, would be meeting with those in charge of the construction of the power plant within the next couple of weeks to ascertain the number of jobs that would be brought to the area due to the construction. He stated that it had been estimated that 300 jobs would be created. He stated that both Calpine and Kvaerner Construction had been strongly encouraged to hire locally; however, he noted that some employees would be coming from Philadelphia and New Jersey to provide technical skills that may not be available locally. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for acceptance of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT - FEBRUARY 11, 2013 The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met on February 11, 2013 with Chairman Lynn presiding. Purchase of In-Car Computers that Integrate with the Ten Video Systems Purchased Previously with Office of Highway Safety (OHS) Funds During their Regular Meeting of January 14, 2013, City Council approved the purchase of ten in-car video systems with funds granted from the Office of Highway Safety. Police Chief Hosfelt reminded members that these systems are not stand alone systems in the vehicles and require that an integrated computer component be installed in the vehicle to function as intended. The computer component is proprietary and must be purchased from the same sole source vendor, HubData911. Police Chief Hosfelt explained that there are five (5) mobile computer replacements and associated vehicle mounts funded in the Police Department’s FY13 computer replacement and vehicle equipment funding lines. In addition, grant funds are being secured to fund the additional five (5) mobile computers and associated vehicle mounts, for a total of ten in-car computer and video systems for the City’s patrol fleet. These ten systems would upgrade and replace ten older systems in the fleet, which would replace the last of the VHS technology in-car camera systems and update a few of the older digital camera systems. Police Chief Hosfelt stated that this matter had previously been considered; however, since some of the grant funding had been redirected, it was felt that this matter should be reconsidered for approval. He noted that half of the funding ($32,245) was included in the City’s Budget and the remaining half would be obtained from State grant funding, for a total amount of $64,490 for the purchase of the in-car computers.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 20 The Committee recommended approval of staff’s recommendation to purchase ten (10) in-car computers and associated vehicle mounts necessary for the operation of the in-car video systems. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Proposed Ordinance - Staff Substitute #1 for Ordinance #2013-03 - Amending Chapter 22 - Buildings and Building Regulations, Article XII - Vacant Buildings During their meeting of January 14, 2013, members considered proposed Ordinance #2013-03 amending Chapter 22 - Buildings and Building Regulations, Article XII - Vacant Buildings. After much discussion, members referred the matter back to staff to allow them to hold a workshop to develop amendments for consideration and staff was instructed to include residential properties. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that staff met with Mr. Phil McGinnis, Policy Director for the Kent County Association of Realtors, and, as a result, Staff Substitute #1 for Ordinance #2013-03 was developed. She explained that the two (2) main differences were reflected in Lines 21-26, which is a change in the definition of a vacant building, and Line 116, which would extend the exemption to those buildings that are actively being offered for sale or lease from three (3) to five (5) years. Staff recommended adoption of Staff Substitute #1 for Ordinance #2013-03. Responding to Mr. Perza, Mrs. Townshend stated that the definition of an unoccupied building/property, for the purpose of this section of the Code, would include those properties that are not occupied in accordance with their intended use. She noted that, should a building have a change in its use which did not require a zoning amendment, there would still be a requirement for the City to review its current use. Mr. Perza suggested that the proposed ordinance include a specific definition for an unoccupied building. Mr. Phil McGinnis, 555 E. Loockerman Street, reviewed comments regarding the proposed amendment. Responding to Mr. Hare, Mrs. Townshend indicated that the additional amendments presented by Mr. McGinnis had not been incorporated into the proposed Ordinance; however, she indicated no objections. The Committee recommended approval of Staff Substitute #1 for Ordinance #2013-03, stipulating that it include those changes presented by Mr. McGinnis. (The First Reading of the ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting.) By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 21 Staff Substitute #1 for Ordinance #2013-04 - Amending Chapter 22 - Buildings and Building Regulations, Article X - Rental Dwellings During their Regular Meeting of January 28, 2013, City Council considered proposed Ordinance #2013-04 amending Chapter 22 - Buildings and Building Regulations, Article X - Rental Dwellings, without a recommendation by the Committee. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, had advised members that several concerns were relayed during the Committee meeting and in a letter from local Realtors. As a result, she met with Deputy City Solicitor William Pepper, Police Chief James Hosfelt, MCpl. Paul Bernat, and Councilman Lynn to develop two (2) staff amendments. These amendments were presented to City Council for their review and consideration, which resulted in additional recommendations by City Council. After much discussion, it was suggested that all of the amendments proposed during the discussion be consolidated and presented as a whole. Therefore, City Council referred the matter back to the Committee for their review and recommendation. Mrs. Townshend reviewed the proposed amendments, indicating that they would address previously relayed concerns and incorporate the suggestions made by the Committee as well as City Council. She explained the dire need for the proposed ordinance, not just for a few bad landlords and/or neighborhoods, but for the entire City. In support of the proposed amendments, Police Chief Hosfelt stated that they would provide the Police Department and City another tool to help evict those individuals who are “bringing down” the City and noted that each Council District would benefit from such an ordinance. He advised members that such programs have had great success, citing the Dover Housing Authority and several other apartment managers, throughout the City. As an example, he stated that there was one (1) major incident in a Dover Housing Authority residence last year and within 24 hours, there was a U-Haul outside of the residence. Since then, there have been no major problems, explaining that this approach sends a clear message to the neighborhood and goes hand in hand with the Downtown Safety Task Force and the Wells Fargo Grant initiative and would support all issues the City has been attempting to address and eradicate. Although landlords may not initially like the new regulations, Chief Hosfelt felt confident that they would realize that the regulations serve as a tool to help them with problem tenants. Mr. Lynn advised members that since the Justice of the Peace Court in Delaware has exclusive jurisdiction over all landlord/tenant actions, Chief Magistrate Alan G. Davis was requested to review the proposed ordinance amendments and noted that his comments were provided to members. On behalf of the Committee, he relayed great appreciation to Chief Magistrate Davis for taking his time to review and comment on this matter. In addition, Mr. Lynn noted the receipt of correspondence received from Mr. William Hickcox. Mr. Anderson reiterated his concerns and noted that they were also mentioned by Chief Magistrate Davis; therefore, he suggested the following amendments: 1) change SA#1 (a)(1) from “Any arrest for a Felony” to “Any conviction for a Felony”; and 2) change SA#1 (a)(2) from “Three or more arrests for Class A Misdemeanors within a 12-month period” to “Three or more arrests for Class A Misdemeanors or above within a 12-month period.” Otherwise, he stated that the City would be in court fighting the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and everyone else, which he would not object to as long as the City had a “strong hand.” Mr. Anderson stated that the heart of this ordinance was absolutely necessary and was not punishing landlords, but rather protecting them

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 22 (property values, enhanced ability to safeguard their property and property rights), as well as the surrounding residents. Rather than viewing the amendments as a punishment to landlords, he stated that it should be viewed as something that empowers landlords to be a part of keeping the community safe. Mr. Hare again relayed his objections with creating requirements for excellent landlords who have never caused problems in order to address issues created by other landlords. He suggested that only those landlords who have had violations or issues be made to take the required landlord class. Those landlords that opt out of taking the class and then have a problem would be required to pay a severe penalty ($200) and be mandated to then take the class. He stated his understanding of the need for the requirements but felt that they should specifically be for problematic landlords rather than penalizing all landlords by requiring them to take the class. Mr. Rushe explained his concern with the City infringing upon the property rights of both landlord and tenants. Referring to the letter received from Chief Magistrate Davis, he noted that there were such laws already in the Delaware Code, although it refers to convictions rather than arrests. Mr. Bonar advised members that other than the naming of Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, this issue had resulted in the receipt of more phone calls than any other issue in his time serving as a member of City Council. He referred to an email received from a local property owner who operates a bed and breakfast and also serves as a Realtor, and read a portion of the email, as follows:: “We have made a very large investment in this City and want to promote Dover in both of the businesses but I have to tell my guests where it is safe to walk. Our current tenant is in an apartment and she tells me she is afraid to go out at night because of the gangs of young men who hang out in the alley and obvious drug activity that goes on in the neighborhood.” Mr. Bonar stated that this property owner asked if the City could do something about these concerns. He felt it was Council’s responsibility to take action and that the proposed ordinance was a step in the right direction. In response to Mr. Bonar, Mr. Pepper stated that he had worked with staff (Mrs. Townshend and Police Chief Hosfelt) as well as Mr. Lynn in the development of the proposed ordinance and amendments. He noted that the concept was to apply the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations that apply to public housing to all rental housing throughout the City. He assured members that HUD regulations had been upheld in Delaware and if there is criminal activity in public housing, the individuals involved can be evicted, noting that there was no requirement of a conviction. Mr. Pepper felt that the City may be “pushing it” by instituting the regulations on just an arrest, particularly for those crimes that are less than Class A misdemeanors. Noting that the purpose was to maintain a quality of life, he suggested the inclusion of a list of crimes. Mr. Bonar stated his desire for the City to err more on the side of caution and make sure that citizenry is not subjected to undue legal expenses when it can be avoided. Responding, Mr. Pepper noted that the noise ordinance, which requires eviction after a certain threshold, would not be covered under the Delaware Code referred to by the Chief Magistrate; therefore, he stated that the City had already gone into “uncharted waters.” However, he stated that he was not aware of how many cases of eviction there had been under the noise ordinance since the City Solicitor’s Office is not typically involved. Mr. Bonar questioned if the Police Department or Planning and Community Development Department would have such records.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 23 Responding to Mr. Hutchison, Mrs. Townshend stated that the proposed ordinance was compatible with all federally funded housing. Mr. Bonar also expressed concern with the City applying guidelines that are relevant to a federally funded jurisdiction to those of a privately owned rental unit whose occupants do not receive any subsidy. Mr. Perza indicated his concurrence with several comments that had been made by Mr. Rushe regarding future impacts; with Mr. Bonar regarding the state of our neighborhoods and the concerns of the growth of Dover and desires of our neighborhoods in the future; and with Mr. Pepper, particularly regarding the notice requirement as it pertains to what is required of a tenant. He expressed his reservations regarding leaving a vague decision up to the Chief of Police or any City official, suggesting that offenses and requirements be very specific and include a defined list. Mr. Joseph E. Bauer, Sr., 135 Old Forge Drive (Hamlet), advised members that he had observed members discussing their concerns about how the proposed ordinance would affect problem tenants and landlords. He advised members that these situations affect him and his wife as residents. Upon retirement in 1995, they moved into their residence and, for the love of the area, they purchased the property in 1998. He stated that the first couple of years were nice; however, he stated that now, when the weather is nice, it is necessary for him to observe who is outside in order to avoid a confrontation. Mr. Bauer stated that it is a regular occurrence for police officers to pay visits to other residents. He indicated that his property was recently appraised at the same level as when it was purchased in 1998, and though he acknowledged that the economy had been down, he thought there would have been some growth since 1998. Having observed other properties in the neighborhood, he stated that he could plainly see that it was not the same type of neighborhood as it was in 1995. Although there was concern for those that the proposed ordinance would directly affect, Mr. Bauer requested that members also consider and understand the deleterious affects these problems have caused to other residents who live in the City and pay taxes. He relayed his support for the proposed ordinance and felt that it would help keep his neighborhood at its current level and allow for it to grow into the type of neighborhood it was when he first moved into the area. Mr. Steve Wilson, 51 Greenwood Drive, stated his observation that there are no longer middle-class developments in the City and there is an abundance of apartments being bought by investors who do not live in Delaware. These investors immediately apply for Section 8 Housing so that they will not have to fix these buildings up. He noted that there are other agencies that house mental patients, sex offenders, or legitimate criminals that would otherwise be in mental institutions, halfway houses, or prisons. He advised members that these landlords are aware of what is occurring with their tenants but they have no interest in anything but money. Mr. Wilson suggested that the housing authorities make sure that only those that are entitled to live at a residence are actually living there, explaining that on several occasions individuals from another area are arrested. He felt that if the City would take the time to contact the jurisdiction from which the arrested individuals come, their benefits would be terminated due to non-residency. He felt that more effort should be made to cross reference so that many of the problems could be eliminated. Ms. Mary Jane Starkey, 139 Old Forge Drive, advised members that the property next door to her is a problem for the City. The landlord lives in New Jersey and does nothing for the property unless the City becomes involved. She indicated that the fence in the back and front of the property is

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 24 currently in bad shape. The landlord has had to install three (3) new storm doors recently because the tenants destroy them. She stated that, as adjacent property owners, they have done everything possible to have something done with the landlord as well as the tenants. She stated that two (2) boys who were tenants have both been arrested and convicted for serious crimes involving guns. Ms. Starkey advised members that one of the boys was responsible for assaulting an individual in the area and is due to be released soon, and that this is very frightening. She indicated that these boys have been observed carrying a dog by its ears, using a kitten as a basketball, etc. She stated that police are constantly being observed swarming the neighborhood. Although she understands the concerns some members have regarding good landlords, she explained that it was unfair for good residents to pay for bad residents. Ms. Ami Sebastian-Hauer, Executive Director of the Dover Housing Authority, advised members of the Dover Housing Authority’s experience with the “one strike you’re out” policy. In 1996, HUD authorized all housing authorities to adopt a policy that would allow them to evict tenants/participants in Section 8 for criminal activity. She stated that the policy addresses criminal activity, explaining that individuals do not need to be arrested, nor must there be a conviction in order to evict a tenant. All tenants in public housing and Section 8 are required to follow the policies. If DHA becomes aware of any violation, they allow for due process, providing seven (7) days for repair. Management talks to the individual, and if it is discovered that the violation has not been corrected to their satisfaction, then the tenant is convicted. Ms. Sebastian-Hauer reminded members of a major shooting that occurred at Manchester Square in 2010. It was discovered that two (2) of the Dover Housing Authority’s tenants housed two (2) of the shooters and allowed guns to be brought into the public housing units. These tenants were given 24 hour evictions and left within that time frame. She reiterated that the Dover Housing Authority is permitted to terminate Section 8 assistance based on an individual’s participation in criminal and drug related activity and no arrest or conviction is necessary. At the request of Mrs. Williams, Ms. Sebastian-Hauer advised members that since the policy went into effect, the Dover Housing Authority has been proactive and has reviewed the issues as a whole. Noting that they provide program and services for families, she explained that they began to address “soft” skills, assure children have after school activities, and improve developments by increasing lighting and installing security cameras. As a result of these actions, she stated that the housing stock has improved and that they have been able to decrease their maintenance staff from 15 to eight (8). Mr. Phil McGinnis, 555 E. Loockerman Street, stated that he represents the Kent County Association of Realtors (KCAR) and reviewed comments regarding the proposed amendment. Mrs. Townshend stated no objections to incorporating the suggestions provided by the KCAR and felt that they would provide clarification. The Committee recommended referring Staff Substitute #1 for Ordinance #2013-04 back to staff, to allow for the inclusion of the changes presented by Mr. McGinnis and to ensure that the concerns relayed by Chief Magistrate Davis are addressed. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 25 Proposed Charter Amendments Due to time constraints, Chairman Lynn stated that the Proposed Charter Amendments would be deferred until the next meeting. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for acceptance of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report, seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. EVALUATION OF BIDS - UNIT 3 GENERATOR WORK Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that this project is intended to perform inspections and repairs to the Unit 3 Generator to be completed during the scheduled upcoming spring outage on that unit. Included in the inspection will be a full battery of electrical tests on the generator to determine condition for continued operation. As part of that inspection, typical wear components such hydrogen seals and insulation bushings will be replaced. No major component replacements are anticipated. Proposals were solicited from ten (10) vendors; three (3) did not respond, three (3) declined to bid, and four (4) provided proposals. The proposals were evaluated using cost, experience, and bid completeness. The bidder with the highest evaluated score is North American Energy Services (NAES) Turbine Services. That bidder also provided the lowest bid. Following is a summary of the evaluation scores and the submittal prices: Evaluation Score Contractor (out of a possible 5.00) Price NAES Turbine Service 4.61 $199,675.00 TurboCare 4.60 $209,920.00 Turbine Pros 3.33 $277,396.00 General Electric 3.01 $447,518.00 The contract price leaves $36,325 (15.4%) of the budget to cover the Plant Operator’s materials and unknown items. If it is determined that additional funds are needed to complete unforeseen major repairs, the funding sources will be identified and submitted to City Staff recommended awarding the contract to the low bidder, North American Energy Services (NAES) Turbine Services in the Amount of $199,675. Mr. Bonar moved for approval of Staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 26 EVALUATION OF BIDS - ELECTRIC POLE INSPECTION AND TREATMENT Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, informed members that this is an on-going maintenance program to treat and preserve wooden electric poles that make up part of the City’s electric infrastructure. This maintenance program allows the Electric Department to target rotting poles and replace them prior to jeopardizing the integrity of our electric system. It is a utility standard that all poles be tested once every ten (10) years. To complete testing of all poles (transmission and distribution) throughout the City, the testing program will test roughly 20% of all poles every year for the next five (5) years. The inspection of the poles will determine what type of treatment, if any, is necessary to preserve the life of the poles. It will also identify poles that are in immediate need of replacement at which time City crews will replace those poles. Bids were solicited and advertised according to City Purchasing Policy by the City’s Contract and Procurement Manager under Bid #13-0021EL. Bids were sent directly to three (3) pole testing companies. Only one bid was received and reviewed by staff. Responding to Mr. Perza, Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, stated that Osmose Utilities Services, Inc., was prepared to spend up to $55,000 to test 20% of the poles. He noted that the amount of $31,801 provided was an estimate for 1,000 poles. Mr. Perza noted that it cost $134,000 to bury one (1) mile of cable versus $21,000 to extend one (1) mile of cable overhead and that 60% of the electric lines were now underground. Mr. Koenig noted that those prices were for materials only. He stated that all new installations for subdivisions are underground and each year the City is converting overhead to underground at a rate of approximately $500,000 per year. Staff recommended awarding the three (3) year contract to Osmose Utilities Services, Inc., and the option to extend the contract for two (2) additional one (1) year extensions. Mr. Perza moved for approval of Staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. EVALUATION OF BIDS - CANNON MILL PAVING IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM In concurrence with the City of Dover’s Capital Investments Plan, it was proposed to rehabilitate and complete pavement sections within the City of Dover during Fiscal Year 2013. In particular, the final pavement section, type ‘C’ surface coat, was never installed in the Cannon Mill Subdivision due to the project owners filing for bankruptcy. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, stated that the Letter of Credit was not adequate to cover the expenses and he noted that staff had been working with local legislators to try to find ways to get bankrupt developments dedicated for public maintenance and ownership. He advised members that, earlier in the evening, the Utility Committee recommended that the roads in Cannon Mill be dedicated for public ownership. Mr. Koenig advised that the roads must be dedicated to qualify for Community Transportation Funds and Senator Bushweller and Representative Scott had agreed to fund $165,000 for the paving and completion of the infrastructure in Phase I of the Village of

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 27 Cannon Mill. The total length of scheduled street repaving/overlaying was approximately 4,230 linear feet or 0.80 miles. The following locations were included in the proposed scope of work to be completed under the Cannon Mill Paving Improvements Program: Street Name Exhibit Title Street Name Exhibit Title Cannon Mill Drive Cannon Mill Paradee Drive Cannon Mill East Sheldrake Circle Cannon Mill Quillen Street Cannon Mill Lester Court Cannon Mill West Sheldrake Circle Cannon Mill Nine (9) contractors submitted unit price bids for the proposed work to be performed. Based on the proposed quantities, the estimated contract values were as follows: Contractor Location Amount of Bid Amount of Bid (With Prevailing (Without Wages) Prevailing Wages) American Infrastructure, Inc. West Chester, PA $336, 332.80 $333,140.50 Daisy Construction Co. New Castle, DE $290, 319.70 $277,479.60 David A. Bramble, Inc. Chestertown, MD $289, 980.70 $275,437.10 Del-mar-va Paving Co., Inc. Seaford, DE $285, 975.35 $261,440.05 Diamond Materials, LLC Wilmington, DE $294, 611.18 $278,888.26 George & Lynch Dover, DE $326, 124.05* $314, 028.15* GWP Enterprises Franklinville, NJ $288, 424.34 $281, 469.47 Harmony Construction Co. Wilmington, De $275, 854.27 $264, 051.33 Jerry's Paving Inc. Milford, De $283, 959.67 $266, 517.90 *Evaluated Bid based on Local Vendor Preference The Cannon Mill Paving Improvements Program contract documents allow staff to alter quantities up to 35% without changes to unit prices; therefore, the contract final value may be adjusted to reflect all available funding. Harmony Construction Company, Inc., submitted all of the contractor’s qualification information, which included a list of recently completed projects similar in scope, as well as a financial statement, that were all found to be adequate. It was staff’s opinion that the bid represented fair market value and their qualifications were in accordance with the requirements of this project. In conclusion, staff recommended awarding a construction contract to Harmony Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $275,854.27 for the Cannon Mill Paving Improvement Program, contingent upon acceptance of infrastructure dedication by City Council.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 28 Staff recommended awarding a unit price contract, based upon Bid #13-0016PW, for the Cannon Mill Paving Improvements Program to Harmony Construction Company based on the With Prevailing Wage unit prices for each work item submitted. The Scope of Work for the program would be altered to reflect the funding that had been secured to complete each location. The Public Works Director may add or delete from the contract based on available funding throughout the contract period and inform the City Manager of such additions and deletions. All work would be paid for at the unit prices bid for work completed and accepted by the City of Dover. The total work authorized under this contract would not exceed the available funding in conjunction with the co-project FY 2013 Street and Alley Program. Mr. Koenig requested that this approval be contingent upon Council’s approval of the Dedication of Rights-of-Way and Public Infrastructure - The Village of Cannon Mill - Phase I, which was scheduled for consideration on March 11, 2013. Mr. Lynn asked if the approval of this item could be deferred until the next Council meeting to coincide with the consideration of the Utility Committee’s recommendation that the roads in Cannon Mill be dedicated for public ownership without jeopardizing receipt of Community Transportation Funds. Mr. Koenig stated that this would not jeopardize funding and would only delay construction by two (2) weeks. Mr. Bonar moved for approval of staff’s recommendation to award a unit price contract for the Cannon Mill Paving Improvements Program to Harmony Construction Company. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Lynn moved to table this item until the next Council meeting to afford time to explore the possibility of suing the First National Bank of Wyoming relative to the line of credit. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and carried by a roll call vote of eight (8) yes (Mr. Anderson, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Lynn, Mr. Perza, Mr. Bonar, Mrs. Williams, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison) and one (1) no (Mr. Leary). EVALUATION OF BIDS - PINEY POINT WELL DESIGN/BUILD Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, stated that this project proposes designing and drilling a new production well in the Piney Point Aquifer. This new well, located in Schutte Park, would be a replacement of former Production Well #12, which was located off of Water Street. This well would increase production capacity, increase system pressure, and stabilize chlorine residuals in the water distribution system and was justified with the growing demand of the City’s residents and industrial users. Staff decided to utilize a design/build method to construct this production well. The contractors were responsible for submitting designs that meet the requirements outlined in the Request for Proposals, as well as all applicable regulations. The specific work for this project includes the design and construction of a new well, building, chlorine feed system, 30-inch ductile iron pipe chlorine contact tank and associated piping, valves, meters, appurtenances, excavation, backfill, testing, startup and site restoration. Staff recommended awarding the Contract to JJID (James Julian, Inc., of Delaware) for an amount not to exceed $892,000. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mr. Koenig stated that wells could last for 50 or 60 years, depending on the maintenance and the underground formation. He noted that Well #12 dates back to the 1960's or 1970's and, because of the sub-surface strata, it was not a high-producing well.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 29 Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Koenig stated that this project would help stabilize some of the chlorine residuals in the system, but a considerable amount of pipe would need to be replaced or relined to address the brown water problem in this area. Mr. Anderson stated that if production were not restored, there could be a risk of the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) reducing the City’s allocation, which could negatively affect the economic, industrial, and large manufacturing development in the City. Mrs. Williams moved for approval of staff’s recommendation to award the Contract to JJID (James Julian, Inc., of Delaware) for an amount not to exceed $892,000, seconded by Mr. Anderson and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. APPOINTMENTS/REAPPOINTMENTS - BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS - FOUR (4) YEAR TERMS EXPIRING MARCH 2017 By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the following reappointments to the Board of Assessment Appeals. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Thomas Burns, Real Estate Brokerage of Sales James Galvin, Undesignated William Garfinkel, Undesignated FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE Council President Leary reminded the public that copies of the proposed ordinance were available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or could be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. Final action by Council on the proposed ordinance would take place during the Council Meeting of March 11, 2013. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that the amendments were primarily housekeeping in nature and would improve the administration of the Vacant Building Ordinance. Additionally, the ordinance would set separate, increased fees for vacant commercial properties greater than or equal to 10,000 square feet in floor area. Mrs. Townshend noted that discussion with local Realtors had resulted in an improved definition of a vacant building. Mr. Perza asked if any thought was given to providing a definition for an unoccupied building for purposes of enforcement. Responding, Mrs. Townshend expressed concern with being so specific that the obvious could be missed. She preferred to rely on the building being used for its intended purpose as the standard definition. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the Ordinance Amendment as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: STAFF SUBSTITUTE #1 FOR ORDINANCE #2013-03 (AMENDED) - CHAPTER 22 - BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS, ARTICLE XII - VACANT BUILDINGS

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 30 COUNCIL MEMBERS ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Leary announced that there would be a 5K run/walk for diabetes to benefit the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation on Saturday, March 9th at Fairview Elementary School. Registration would begin at 9:00 a.m. and the 5K at 10:00 a.m. Anyone interested in the event should contact Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend at 242-0381. Mr. Lynn stated that a meeting was held at the Dover Police Department on Wednesday, February 20, 2013 with some members of the downtown community who were very concerned with crime in the downtown Dover area. He thanked Chief Hosfelt and his staff, Mr. Koenig, Mrs. Townshend, the Code Enforcement Staff, specifically Mr. McGinnis, and Councilman Bonar for their participation. Mr. Hutchison announced that there would be no Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Meeting on Wednesday, February 27, 2013. Mr. Hutchison announced that the Dover Little League is getting ready to start the 2013 baseball season and they are approximately $3,000 short in meeting their operating budget for the year. He requested each member of Council to consider making a $100 donation to the Little League, which is a well run, worthwhile organization. Mr. Bonar moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. Meeting Adjourned at 8:58 P.M. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All orders, ordinances, and resolutions adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of February 25, 2013, are hereby approved. CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. MAYOR /TM S:\ClerksOffice\Agendas&Minutes\Council-Minutes\2005\08-22-2005 Council.wpd Exhibits Exhibit #1 - Presentation - Violation of Dangerous Building Ordinance - 416 West Division Street Exhibit #2 - Recreation Trends for Fiscal Years 2012-2013

EXHIBIT #1 EXHIBIT #1 Regular Council Meeting of 02/25/2013 Violation of Dangerous Regular Council Meeting of 02/25/2013 Building Ordinance 416 W Division Street Planning & Inspections Department Dover, Delaware February 25, 2013

416 W Division St Case History  6 code enforcement cases since 2010 – Exterior code violations – Closing of a vacant building  The utilities were terminated on May 24, 2010  Registered as vacant by the city on December 6, 2010  Condemned by City Staff on December 13, 2010 due to no active utilities, broken windows, unlocked doors and subjects gaining entry to the property.  Source of neighbor complaints  Outstanding Charges – Fees for securing the building – $500.00 in unpaid registration fees

Dangerous Building Code – Chapter 22 Article XI, Sec. 22-381 (5) Unfit for habitation. (9) General welfare. (10) Code violations. (12) Unoccupied buildings.

Recommended Council Action  Declare this property dangerous.  Order the property repaired or demolished by March 25, 2013 by the owner or equity owner at their own risk.  Order the Building Inspector to cause the repair or demolition of the property if not completed by the owner within 10 days of the date established by City Council.  Order the City Manager with the assistance of the City Solicitor to cause the cost of repairs or demolition to be charged against the land on which the property exists as a municipal lien or cause such cost to be added to the tax duplicate as an assessment, or to be levied as a special tax, or to be recovered in a suit at law against the owner.

EXHIBIT #2 EXHIBIT #2 Regular Council Meeting of 02/25/2013 Regular Council Meeting of 02/25/2013

Planning, Inspections & Recreation 2012 Annual Report Introduction 2012 was a year of change and adjustment within the Department of Planning and Inspections. With citywide reorganization, Planning and Inspections came back together as one department after being separated since 2006. In July, Economic Development moved out of the Planning and Inspections Department and into the Mayor’s Office. Also in July, the City’s Recreation Division joined the Planning and Inspections Department. The economic downturn has continued to affect the Planning and Inspections area, as application volumes remained low and building vacancy remained high. In Fiscal Year 2012, which ended June 30, 2012, the Department brought in $2,769,564 in the Planning and Inspections area, an increase in $352,000 over the prior fiscal year. As in prior years, institutional projects continued strong, contributing to the local economy. Notable construction projects included:  New Dover High School Construction underway  Capital School District Administrative Complex completed  Renovations to the Kent County Court House nearly complete  Site improvements at the Booker T. Washington Elementary School/William Henry Middle School Campus  Construction underway on the Delaware Technical and Community College Campus  Continued renovations at Bayhealth Kent General Hospital An exciting addition to the Department is the Recreation Division. The Recreation staff has been working hard to build on the strengths of our programming and look for opportunities to improve our service to the community. In October, the Recreation staff was relocated from Dover Park on White Oak Road to the John W. Pitts Center. While the staff has been adjusting to the new space constraints, having the entire Recreation staff located in one facility has allowed us to improve efficiency and expand services. In late 2012, through modifying staff schedules, we were able to start opening the Pitts Center at 6:30 a.m. for early morning walkers. The expanded hours have been well received by the community. A lot of time and attention has been paid to working with Calpine Corporation to get the plans complete for the Garrison Energy Cen- ter, which is expected to begin construction in spring 2013. The Plan- ning Office also continued to work closely with the Capital School District and DelDOT as the new Dover High School construction has progressed. Efforts continue with regard to ensuring safe access to the Dover High School for pedestrians. Another priority of the Department over the last year was addressing the issue of vacant and dangerous buildings. During 2012, 28 build- ings were declared dangerous by City Council, 10 buildings were de- Dover High School—A Bird’s Eye View 1

molished either by the owner due to a dangerous building declaration or by the City, and 8 properties were re- paired by the owner. At the close of 2012, 366 buildings were registered Vacant, and $28,750 in fees were collected from Vacant Building registrations. These numbers demonstrate the City’s commitment to address the problems of vacant and deteriorated properties. Respectfully Submitted, Ann Marie Townshend, AICP Director of Planning, Inspections & Recreation Building Inspections Staff: Greg Akers, Chief Building Inspector / Plans Examiner; Mike McGregor Building Inspector II; and Chris Scott, Licensed Plumbing / HVAC Inspector II. Mr. Akers supervises the construction inspectors, reviews of construction documents for permitting, and meets with design professionals concerning proposed construction projects. Mr. McGregor assists in review of construction documents, performs inspections of commercial and residential work under construction and manufactured buildings. Mr. Scott’s responsibilities are Greg Akers, Chief Building Inspector inclusive of assisting in plans review and performance of plumb- ing and HVAC inspections for commercial and residential buildings under construction. The Building Inspections staff assists in revitalizing abandoned structures through the plans and permits pro- cess, responds to inquiries related to construction, assists in property damage assessment after significant damage causing events occur, enforces licensing of contractors, and regulates permit requirements for con- struction and/or repairs regulated by the Building and Life Safety Codes. The City has adopted the 2009 Inter- national Code series. During 2012, the Building Inspections staff conducted 7,969 inspections. Of these, 3,577 were building construction inspections, 4,392 were Plumbing/HVAC inspections, and 128 were building walk-throughs. Building and Life Safety Codes address occupancy, structural strength, means of egress, sanitation, adequate lighting and ventila- tion, accessibility, energy conservation and life safety in regard to new and existing buildings, facilities and systems. These issues are specific to structures and adja- cent structures as they may relate. Chris Scott, Plumbing / HVAC Inspector II Mike McGregor, Building Inspector II 2

Permits Issued Type of permit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Construction 940 839 825 742 772 Plumbing / Mechanical 1,350 1,027 1,077 672 713 Fire Prevention / Life Safety 121 97 91 93 81 Totals 2,411 1,963 1,993 1,507 1,566 Back to Life! In 2012, while new construction was slow, great progress was made as two abandoned construction projects found new life and were completed and occupied. The Grande, the former Dove View apartments near Forrest Avenue that sat vacant in a state of partial completion since 2008 were completed and occupied in late 2012. Construction on a third building should begin in 2013. The Silver Bullit Office Building on Route 13 was also completed and occupied in 2012. City Planning and Inspections staff worked closely with the owners of both projects to help bring them back to life. The Grande, ______Dove View _____ Silver Bullit, __North DuPont Highway 3

2012: Progress in Pictures Kent County Courthouse Renovations, The Green Bayard Plaza, 200 West Loockerman Street Coming Soon—Grotto’s! Governors Avenue Animal Hospital Dover High School—Under Construction Dover Public Library 4

Fire Marshal’s Office Staff: David Truax, Fire Marshal; Timothy Mullaney, Jr., Deputy Fire Marshal/Inspector I. For the year 2012, the Fire Marshal’s Office conducted inspections in 376 occupancies with the following types of inspections 127 Property Maintenance Inspections, 180 Fire Code Inspections, 71 New Fire Protection Inspections, 238 Existing Fire Protection Inspections, 41 Certificate of Occupancy Inspections, 262 License and Permit Inspections, 87 Administrative walk-through Inspections, and 157 Life Safety Inspections. A total of 1539 inspections were completed for the year with 199 deficiencies found and corrected. Total complaints handled were 487. Tim Mullaney digs through debris at fire scene Fire investigations for 2012 were as follows: Accidental 27, Incendiary 22, and Undetermined 7 for a total of 56 fire investigations. Fire loss for 2012 is: Accidental causes $161,350, Incendiary causes $215,250, and Undetermined causes $22,500 for a total fire loss of $399,100. There were seven injuries and one death due to fire in 2012. Fire protection saves is when a fire alarm, single station smoke detector, fire extinguisher or fire suppression system activates and sounds an alarm or suppresses a fire. Of the 19 activations reported, 5 were fire alarm activations, 10 were single station smoke detectors, 2 were sprinkler activations, and 2 were a fire Fatal Fire at 38 N. New Street extinguisher. The Fire Marshal’s Office is made up of the Fire Marshal and two Deputy Fire Marshals with the responsibility for conducting inspections annually and semi-annually in Apartments, Assembly, Daycares, Health Care, Industrial, Mercantile, Schools, Hotels & Motels, and Business occupancies. The Fire Marshal’s Office handles complaints with regard to over-crowding, locked means of egress, fire lanes, and impaired fire protection. The sprinkler, fire alarm, Clearfield Apartment Fire hood suppression, and other forms of fire protection are reviewed and tested by the Fire Marshal’s Office. The Office is responsible for the investigation into origin and cause of fires and explosions within the City of Dover. In May of 2012, Tim Mullaney graduated from the New Castle Police Academy and is certified as a law enforcement officer. The addition of this certification has greatly enhanced the Office’s ability to investigate fires by allowing the Office to conduct the investigation from start to finish. Dave Truax inspects a hoarder’s residence 5

Code Enforcement & Property Maintenance Staff: Tim Taraila, Inspector III/Code Enforcement Supervisor; Ron Coburn, Inspector II/Vacant Buildings; David McGinnis, Inspector I; Jason Osika, Inspector I; Sam Gonzalez, Inspector I. The Code Enforcement Officers entered a total of 3,476 cases into the H.T.E. system with regard to violations of the Dover Code of Ordinances and Zoning Ordi- nance. Based on the data demonstrating the reason for the inspections, more than 68 percent of cases are Types of Inspections/Cases Entered initiated by Planning, Inspections or Public Works staff . Within these cases, 6,709 inspections were Annual Rental Housing Inspections 541 performed for code compliance. All cases entered must have an origination code, such as a citizen complaint or Property Maintenance Exterior 540 an officer’s observation. Listed is a break- down of the reasons for inspections, the number of Tall Grass and Weeds 578 inspections performed by the Code Enforcement Abandoned Vehicle 120 Inspections staff, and a list of the different types of inspections conducted. After struggling with how to Unregistered Vehicle 26 respond to complaints that involve violations inside owner-occupied dwelling, particularly those involving No Valid Rental Permit 143 unsanitary conditions that create problems for neighbors; the Code Enforcement Division was Electric Service Termination 311 successful in obtaining search warrants through Court 7 to gain access to dwellings. While this is a tool that will All Others 851 be used only when all other routes of addressing these violations are unsuccessful, it will allow the Division to TOTAL 3,476 address complaints that previously would have had insufficient resolution. Causes for Inspections: In addition, the Property Maintenance and Code En- Citizen/Tenant complaint 718 forcement Officers conducted another 192 inspections relating to new Construction, Building, Fence, and Sign City Council/Mayor/City Manager 32 Permits. The Officers also assisted in the collection of Itinerant Merchant Licenses during the two Race Opera- Electric Department Referral 288 tions conducted at Dover International Speed- Other Agency Referral 71 way. These operations were conducted during the spring and fall NASCAR sporting events. Staff Initiated 2,367 TOTAL 3,476 6

Vacant Buildings As part of the Vacant Buildings program the Code Enforcement Officers registered in 2012 a total of 366 buildings within the City limits of Dover and collected $28,750 in registration fees from these registrations. Since the program began in 2007, a total of 826 structures have been registered as vacant. Currently, staff estimates that there are approximately 300 of these structures still vacant. Numerous previous registered vacant buildings have come into code compliance by either being re-occupied or by being demol- ished. Demolition in Progress Dangerous Buildings and Demolitions 45 buildings or structures were active on the Dangerous Building Demolished by the City of Dover: List. Of these, the following 10 structures were demolished, 5 by the City and 5 by the owner, with 11 additional structures coming 423 Collins Drive into code compliance by renovations or abatement. 41 S Queen Street 118 N Ann Avenue Licensing and Permitting 14 S Queen Street Staff: Kristen Mullaney, Office Assistant II; Judy Rockey, Office 171 Orchard Avenue Assistant II; Diane Metsch, Administrative Assistant. Demolished or Repaired by Owner The Permit and Licensing staff is the first contact most customers 344 West Wind Drive have with the Department of Planning and Inspections and with the 357, 361, 365, 408 Northdown Drive City of Dover, as they staff City Hall’s front counter. This staff is responsible for the receipt and processing of all permit and license application, including building permits, rental permits, public occupancy permits, and business licenses. They are also responsi- ble for ensuring that delinquent permit and license renewals are distributed to the appropriate staff for follow-up. In addition, they answer the phones for the Planning and Inspections Department, field questions from the public, handle complaints, and schedule inspections and meetings for departmental staff. The charts includ- ed are examples of just some of the important work done by this staff. Their contributions to customer service are immeasurable. While much of their work cannot be directly quantified, without 7

their efforts, the Department could not function. They present a high standard of prompt and courteous ser- vice. Planning Office Staff: Dawn Melson-Williams, Principal Planner; Janelle Cornwell, Planner II; Tracey Harvey, Planner I; Maretta Purnell, Secretary II. Planning Applications/Boards and Commissions The Planning Office coordinates the review and approval of all development applications within the City and provides support to the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment, and Historic District Commission. Dur- ing 2012, the Planning Office processed 79 new applications and continued review on applications that had been submitted in previous years. Community Development In 2012, the Community Development Office became a part of the Planning Office. With concurrence of City Council, the pro- gram was changed to select applicants for a three-year period. Funding requests from selected applicants will be reviewed an- nually by the Parks, Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee. The Community Development program is also re- sponsible to ensuring that the City works with partners to affirmatively further fair housing. In this regard, the Planning Commission received Fair Housing training from the Delaware Human Relations staff. The fol- lowing applications were awarded funding in 2012:  Milford Housing Development Corporation (MHDC) Emergency Home Repairs—Emergency re- pairs have been completed on two (2) owner occupied homes eliminating severe housing conditions that constitute health and safety hazards year to date.  Homeownership Assistance Program—Throughout the year, four (4) families closed on homes using the City of Dover’s Homeownership Assistance Program and received homeownership counseling through NCALL.  Dover Interfaith Mission to the Homeless—CDBG funds were utilized to cover the operations costs for the homeless shelter.  NCALL Research—Ten (10) first-time homebuyers re- ceived housing counseling and foreclosure prevention.  Serenity Place—CDBG funds were utilized to assist in the rebuilding of a treatment facility that services men who suf- fer from substance abuse.  Elizabeth Murphey School—CDBG funds were provided to install a geothermal heating system in one of the facilities that services children that are at risk for homelessness. The Community Development Program also administers fund- ing for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP). In 2009, City of Dover was awarded 1.5 million dollars from Delaware State Housing Authority to purchase foreclosed properties in 343 Mimosa Avenue—NSP Home the City, rehabilitate them, and sell them to eligible fami- 8

lies. The City has partnered with Dover Housing Authority, Diamond State Community Land Trust, Connec- tions Community Support Program and Habitat for Humanity. To date, the partners have purchased 10 proper- ties. Eight (8) properties have been sold, one is a lease purchase, and one is a rental that serves persons with disabilities. Comprehensive Plan Implementation & Ordinance Development The Planning Office is responsible for developing ordinances and other activities to implement the City’s Comprehensive Plan. In this regard, the following projects were priorities of the Planning Staff in 2012:  Update to Sign Regulations—The Planning Office met with members of the business and real estate community for six months to conduct a comprehensive review of the City’s sign regulations. In August, City Council approved Ordinance #2012-13, comprehensively updating the sign regulations. 218 Ann Avenue—NSP Home  Capital City Trail—The Planning Office has worked with the Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Association and DelDOT on planning of the Capital City Trail, which will connect Silver Lake Park with Public Safety Boulevard, where the St. Jones Greenway Isaacs Branch trail begins. Construction of the first phase of this regional trail project is expected to begin in spring 2013, and will include a multi-purpose trail along the St. Jones River between Loockerman Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard behind the Delaware Public Archives parking area.  Comprehensive Plan Amendment—In accordance with the approved procedure for annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Office processed a request to amend the Land Development Plan Map. This request was approved by City Council in March.  Amendment to the A (Agriculture) Zone—Members of City Council sponsored an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow for the sale of agricultural equipment within the A Zone. Ordinance #2012-14 was approved by City Council on August 13, 2012.  Amendment to RGO (General Residence and Office) Zone—Members of City Council sponsored an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow for sale of alcohol in restaurants within the RGO Zone and H (Historic District) Zone. Sale of alcohol will be subject to Conditional Use approval by the Planning Com- mission. City Council approved Ordinance #2012-15 on August 13, 2012.  Amendments to AEOZ (Airport Environs Overlay Zone)—Planning staff began the process to adopt ordinances to update the City’s Airport Environs Overlay Zone based on the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone study completed by the Dover Air Force Base in 2010. All affected property owners were con- tacted regarding the proposed changes, and the Planning Office held a public workshop on November 8, 2012. The ordinance amendments will be presented to City Council in early 2013.  Bamboo Ordinance—The Planning Office did research and drafted an ordinance to prohibit the growing of bamboo on properties within the City. Ordinance #2012-16 was approved by City Council on July 9, 2012.  Update to Community Flood Insurance Rate Maps—The Planning Office is participating in the process of updates to specific Community Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) as a result of a new Flood Insurance Study. The updates are the result of a Coastal Study for Kent County and a study of the Murderkill Water- shed. The process is on-going as there is a specific review and adoption process for the FIRM Map panels by FEMA and the community. The City will be required to review its existing floodplain codes and ordi- nances as part of this adoption process in 2013 (Zoning Ordinance Article 5 Section 4). In addition, other floodplain and drainage planning activities are occurring in Delaware. Planning Staff attended the Senate Bill 64 Floodplain and Drainage Advisory Committee Community Outreach Meeting 9

on August 15, 2012. The meeting included a review of the Adopted Floodplain and Drainage Standards and Recommendations (DNREC Secretary’s Order # 2012-WS-0029 effective August 2, 2012). As a fol- low-up, municipalities were asked to self-review their existing regulations to access and report on the con- sistencies/deficiencies of local programs regarding floodplain and drainage activities and their capacity to implement the standards and recommendations. The Planning Office completed self-assessment and sub- mitted it to DNREC in December 2012. The self-assessment identified a number of areas where Dover could improve its floodplain and drainage regulations; Planning Staff will continue working on this in 2013.  Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS4)—The Planning Office has continued to work to implement the requirements of our MS4 permit. Much of the support for the permit implementation has been provided by Major Projects  Dover Public Library The Dover Public Library project (S-10-06) after receiving Site Plan approvals and Building Permits in 2011 was actively under construction in 2012. The Planning Staff participated in inspections for the building and site to confirm compliance with the approved Site Plan in mid- September 2012 for a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. Members of the Planning Staff also attended the ribbon cutting ceremony on Septem- ber 20, 2012 to celebrate the opening of the new Dover Public Library. Site improvement work continued in the Fall-Winter of 2012 on areas such as the Reading Garden, installation of site furnishings, paving, etc.  New Dover High School Project (C-10-05 and S-11-18) The Site Development Master Plan for the new Dover High School pro- ject was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission in Decem- ber 2010. In 2012, Planning Staff continues to be involved in the vari- ous planning discussions and review activities related to the new Dover High School project to be constructed on the south side of Forrest Ave- nue (Route 8). Dover Public Library—Opened September Through August 2012, the Planning Staff continued monthly progress meetings on the project with City Staff (Planning, Public Works, and Public Utilities), the district, their design professionals and construction manager, and other appropriate review agencies. In 2012, the new Dover High School pro- gressed from foundation work to building construction. The Building Permit for the building construction was issued in March 2012, and construction on the signalized west entrance (Dover High Drive and Route 8) began in July 2012. In June 2012, the results of the signal analysis being con- ducted for the east entrance were received noting that a signal is not warranted at that location. City Staff, the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee, and City Council have expressed concerns regarding traffic and pedestrian access in the area of the east entrance. 10

Discussions with DelDOT remain on-going on this item.  Garrison Oak Technical Park/Garrison Energy Center The City continued to move forward during 2012 with review of the subdivision of the Garrison Oak Tech- nical Park. In April, the Planning Commission reviewed and granted conditional approval of the Garrison En- ergy Center Master Plan. Staff has continued to review the site plan phases administratively along with other review agencies. Calpine Corporation subsequently prepared a report to address the Performance Standards identified in the Zoning Ordinance, which was approved by the Planning Commission in August. Staff contin- ues to work closely with Calpine and others to keep the project on track to break ground in March 2013. Boards and Commissions Planning Commission The Planning Commission consist of nine members with Col. Robert Welsh as Chairman and Fred Tolbert as Vice-Chairman. The Planning Commission met monthly in 2012. The Planning Commission reviewed 34 applications for 2012. The Commission reviewed 12 Site Plan, 6 Conditional Use Plans, 2 Minor Subdivision Plans, 2 Comprehensive Unified Sign Plans and 9 Miscellaneous applications. The Site Plans reviewed by the Planning Commission included an addition to the Dover Mall for the establishment of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Leander Lakes to allow for the construction of 240 apartments to be located off of Forrest Ave, multiple build- ing additions at the Delaware Technical and Community College and to allow for the construction of Serenity Place. The Conditional Use applications included the establishment of a tea house on North State Street, and the establishment of a church on Loocker- man Street. The Planning Commission made Planning Commission Applications recommendation to City Council on 1 An- nexation and 2 Rezoning's and revisions to 2012 the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. A number of the Miscellaneous applications were text Mi s cellaneous amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. The 9 Planning Commission made recommendation Site Plans 12 to City Council on the various text amend- Unified Sign ments. The text amendments included a 2 comprehensive update to the Sign Regula- Subdivisions tions, revisions to the RG-O and A Zoning 2 Conditional Rezoning 2 Districts. Annexations Uses 6 1 There were an additional 23 applications that were submitted to the Planning Office for administrative review. This included 8 Administrative Site Plan and 15 Miscellaneous applications. The Administrative Site Plans included a building addition to Winner Ford-Hyundai, the Wesley College Streetscape Improvements, the in- stallation of new building equipment for NRG Energy Center of W. North St., and the first phase of the new Optics Building at Delaware State University. A number of the Miscellaneous applications involved the movement of property lines or the combination of parcels. Historic District Commission The Historic District Commission consists of five members with Dick Scrafford as Chairman and Charles Salkin as Vice-Chairman. The Historic District Commission held five meetings in 2012. The Historic District Commission reviewed seven (7) applications for Architectural Review Certificates in 2012. This included the referral of one Building Permit to the Historic District Commission for review of the exterior finishes for the 11

Frankfurt Bakery at 323 South Governors Avenue and one Building Permit for review of the Pedestrian and Landscape Enhancements of the East Edge of The Green and Court Street Promenade. Other projects reviewed involved proposals for a Banner Programs at the Johnson Victrola Museum and the Wesley Permits issued for Architectural Review Certification U.M. Church; Rear Plaza Improvements at 22- 2012 24 West Loockerman Street and the request for 2 demolition of the building at 509 South State Building Permits Reviewed by Staff Street (action on application in February 2013). Building Permits Reviewed In July, the Historic District Commission also 25 by HDC heard a presentation on the bike and pedestrian 27 Building Permits Reviewed improvements for the Court Street Gateway by HDC and PC Sign Permits Reviewed by project. Staff Sign Permits Reviewed by Of the 61 building permits issued in the HDC 4 Historic District in 2012, 47 permits required 3 Architectural Review Certification. A break- down of permits handled administratively versus those reviewed by the Historic District Commission is in- cluded in the appendix. The Historic District area of Downtown Dover continues to be the site of many community festivals, parades, and activities associated with the First State Heritage Park. The construction of several major projects previ- ously reviewed by the Historic District Commission brought changes to Downtown Dover as well. September 2012 saw the opening of the Dover Public Library at 35 Loockerman Plaza. In 2012, construction activities also continued with renovations at the old Kent County Courthouse, the construction of the Bayard Plaza mixed use building at 200 West Loockerman Street, and construction of Loockerman Way (plaza area) and North Street Parking Lot Improvements. Board of Adjustment The Planning Office received 15 variance applications for the Board of Adjustment in 2012. Of those, 10 variances were approved, two were denied, two applications were withdrawn by the applicant, and one application was deferred until January 2013. Four variance requests were related to signage, three were requesting a reduction in parking requirements, and two were requesting the re-establishment of non-conforming uses. The Board of Adjustment has a narrow focus in its role, as specified by the Zoning Ordi- nance and Delaware Code. The Board strictly applies the legal standard prescribed by code, which has helped to keep the volume of applications submitted to the Board relatively low. 12

Recreation Division Full-Time Staff: Carolyn Courtney, Administra- tive Assistant; Steve Pickering, Sports Coordina- tor; Wayne Voshell, Recreation Center Coordina- tor; Sherwanda Rachal-Speaks, Recreation Spe- cialist; Peggy O’Brien, Office Assistant II. In ad- A peek into our numbers…. dition to the full-time staff, the Recreation Divi- sion is staffed by three part-time employees and  50,754 patrons & visitors were recorded in the three seasonal/temporary employees. Pitts Center  4,000 (approx.) participated in our softball, field hockey, lacrosse and volleyball leagues  $112,500 Total FY12 revenues  $60,000 Leagues  $20,000 General Recreation  $18,000 Field/Building Rentals  $ 7,300 Trips  $ 7,200 Sports  35 Children served in Towne Point After School Program  124 Children participated in Super Summer Playground and Camp Small Wonder The Recreation Division is responsible for the  371 People participated in non-league sports operation of the John W. Pitts Center, a number of sports leagues for youth and adults, an after  235 People attended fishing and bus trips school program at Towne Point Elementary  5,357 People attended the Concerts on the School, several summer camp programs, and a Green variety of recreation programs including fitness  130 People attended enrichment programs classes, bus trips, enrichment classes, and other fun activities for all segments of the City’s diverse  431 People attended fitness programs population. 13

Zach Carter Retires after 23 Years of Service After 23 years of dedicated service to the City of Dover, Zach Carter announced his retirement in the summer of 2012. Zach gave his all to the City and on the many boards and commissions on which he held a seat. The St. Jones Greenway Commis- sion, Silver Lake Commission, Kent County Tourism, First Night Dover, 4th of July Committee, and Greater Dover Arts Council just to name a few. During his tenure, Dover’s park facilities flourished and recreation programs grew. Silver Lake Park, Mayfair Park, New Street Park, Dover Park, and local neighbor- hood parks are just some of the examples that showcase Zach’s commitment to the residents of Dover. His ability to obtain grant funding was a key factor in installing age appropriate playground equipment, replacing non-compliant equipment in parks throughout the City of Dover. Much work was done under his leadership on water quality and restoration efforts for Silver Lake, Mirror Lake and the St. Jones. Workshops and planting projects were hosted to encourage the community involvement in shrub/tree planting projects. His contributions will be long lasting for Dover. On a personal note, Zach’s love for sports was known by many as he coached his children on various sports teams and was a fixture on the sideline when not managing or coaching. Today, Zach remains in Dover with his wife Janet. On hot summer days you’ll find him on a baseball dia- mond as he continues managing the American Legion Fox Post II baseball team. Silver Lake Commission Completed in partnership with DNREC with grant funding this project has been well received by our With Dean Holden as Chairman, the Silver Lake park users, fisherman, & families who have appreci- Commission hosted many items on their agenda this ated efforts to improve and protect this waterway. past year. Noted as a major accomplishment, the restoration and stream bank revitalization to the St. In the near future, they will be a partner with Jones stream that runs below the Silver Lake dam. DRNEC as they work to restore Mirror Lake and remove the “mud flap” seen at low tide. Current, Silver Lake Commission members include: Dean Holden, Zachery Carter, David Edgell, James Burcham, Nancy Wagner, and Melanie Tymes. Before During Construction Construction Completed 14

Personnel Changes The continued dedication and professionalism of the staff of the Department of Planning, Inspections and Recreation is a critical element in providing services to the community. These qualities allow staff to successfully interact with the residents of our City and support continued community improvement. There were a number of staffing changes within the Department during 2012. The changes are as follows: Tracey Harvey was reclassified from Community Development Manager to Planner I. Changes were made to streamline management of the Community Development program and Tracey assisted with a number of Planning Office responsibilities including Rental Dwelling permit review, site plan review, review of variance applications, and other planning functions. Maretta Purnell was relocated from the Front Office (Licensing and Permitting Division) to the Planning Office. Diane Metsch was relocated from the Planning Office to the Front Office to supervise the Li- censing and Permitting Division. Ann Marie Townshend assumed oversight of the Recreation Division in July, following the retirement of Zach Carter as the Director of Parks and Recreation in June. Ann Marie and the Recreation staff spent the second half of 2012 becoming acquainted with each other and reviewing the programs and opera- tions to try to build on the strengths of our staff and our programs. Ed Martin, Inspector I, was transferred from Building Inspections to Code Enforcement in March 2012. Ultimately, Ed retired from employment in August 2012. Professional Development Staff throughout the department continued to participate in training local opportunities, as reported in our monthly reports. Below are some professional development accomplishments by staff within the department:  In May, Tim Mullaney graduated from the New Castle County Police Academy and became a sworn law enforcement officer.  In December, Dawn Melson-Williams ended her term as the Secretary of the Delaware Chapter of the American Planning Association, Janelle Cornwell assumed the role of Secretary of the Delaware Chapter of the American Planning Association and Ann Marie Townshend became Vice President/President Elect of the Delaware Chapter of the American Planning Association.  Tracey Harvey was elected Regional NAHRO Board Secretary and Panelist for the Statewide Analysis of Impediments at the Governors Conference on Housing. She was also elected to NCALL Board of Com- missioners.  David McGinnis received the International Property Maintenance Certification in 2012. 15

City of Dover MAYOR AND COUNCIL 1 DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013-07 2 A RESOLUTION VACATING AND ABANDONING PORTIONS OF A CERTAIN ALLEY 3 SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DOVER. 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL 5 MET: 6 Section 1. The Council of the City of Dover hereby vacates and abandons the following portions of an alley: 7 Adjacent to 235 Bayard Avenue (ED-05-077.06-01-84.00) 8 Being a portion of that certain piece or parcel of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of 9 Delaware, being an unimproved public alley running in a north to south direction, located to the east of 10 Bayard Avenue, said portion of alley beginning at a point identified as the northeast corner of Parcel No. 11 ED-05-077.06-01-84.00; thence running with Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-84.00 South 22 degrees 11 12 minutes East 60.01 feet along the westerly line of the 14’ wide alley to the northeast corner of Parcel No. 13 ED-05-077.06-01-85.00; thence running North 68 degrees 53 minutes East 7 feet crossing into said 14’ wide 14 alley to a point in the center of the alley, opposite the northeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-85.00; 15 thence running North 22 degrees 11 minutes West 60.01 feet parallel to the westerly line of the 14’ wide 16 alley to a point; thence running South 68 degrees 53 minutes West 7 feet to the westerly side of the 14’ wide 17 alley, being the point and place of beginning and containing 0.0096 acres (420 square feet) of land be the 18 same more or less. The above described parcel of land shall be considered a public utility easement, 19 reserving the rights of the City of Dover, their agents or assigns to free access for ingress and egress to these 20 premises and every part thereof at all times for purpose of installing, maintaining and operating its existing 21 public utilities. 22 Adjacent to 239 Bayard Avenue (ED-05-077.06-01-85.00) 23 Being a portion of that certain piece or parcel of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of 24 Delaware, being an unimproved public alley running in a north to south direction, located to the east of 25 Bayard Avenue, said portion of alley beginning at a point identified as the northeast corner of Parcel No. 26 ED-05-077.06-01-85.00; thence running with Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-85.00 South 22 degrees 11 27 minutes East 60.01 feet along the westerly line of the 14’ wide alley to the northeast corner of Parcel No. 28 ED-05-077.06-01-86.00; thence running North 68 degrees 53 minutes East 7 feet crossing into said 14’ wide 29 alley to a point in the center of the alley, opposite the northeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-86.00; 30 thence running North 22 degrees 11 minutes West 60.01 feet parallel to the westerly line of the 14’ wide 31 alley to a point; thence running South 68 degrees 53 minutes West 7 feet to the westerly side of the 14’ wide 32 alley, being the point and place of beginning and containing 0.0096 acres (420 square feet) of land be the 33 same more or less. The above described parcel of land shall be considered a public utility easement, 34 reserving the rights of the City of Dover, their agents or assigns to free access for ingress and egress to these 35 premises and every part thereof at all times for purpose of installing, maintaining and operating its existing 36 public utilities. P.O. Box 475 ˜ Dover, Delaware ˜19903 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013-07 PAGE 2 37 Adjacent to 243 Bayard Avenue (ED-05-077.06-01-86.00) 38 Being a portion of that certain piece or parcel of land situated in the City of Dover, Kent County, State of 39 Delaware, being an unimproved public alley running in a north to south direction, located to the east of 40 Bayard Avenue, said portion of alley beginning at a point identified as the northeast corner of Parcel No. 41 ED-05-077.06-01-86.00; thence running with Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-86.00 South 22 degrees 11 42 minutes East 68 feet along the westerly line of the 14’ wide alley to the southeast corner of Parcel No. ED- 43 05-077.06-01-86.00 being the southeast terminus of the 14’ wide alley; thence running North 55 degrees 29 44 minutes 31 seconds East 7.2 feet crossing into said 14’ wide alley to a point in the center of the alley, 45 opposite the southeast corner of Parcel No. ED-05-077.06-01-86.00; thence running North 22 degrees 11 46 minutes West 66.3 feet parallel to the westerly line of the 14’ wide alley to a point; thence running South 47 68 degrees 53 minutes West 7 feet to the westerly side of the 14’ wide alley, being the point and place of 48 beginning and containing 0.0108 acres (470.15 square feet) of land be the same more or less. The above 49 described parcel of land shall be considered a public utility easement, reserving the rights of the City of 50 Dover, their agents or assigns to free access for ingress and egress to these premises and every part thereof 51 at all times for purpose of installing, maintaining and operating its existing public utilities. 52 53 Section 2. Since no person has been deprived of property by the vacating and abandoning of the aforesaid 54 portions of the alley, no compensation is awarded. 55 Section 3. The City shall retain a utility easement for the entire length and width of the aforesaid alley and 56 all costs of conveyance shall be borne by the property owners. 57 Section 4. This resolution shall be effective upon the filing of a revised plot plan of the aforesaid alley. 58 ADOPTED: * 59 S:\ABANDONMENTS\2012\235 BAYARD AVENUE\2013-07 - Abandonment of Alley - Bayard Avenue.wpd 60 61 CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. THOMAS J. LEARY 62 MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT 63 Actions History: 64 March 11, 2013 - Introduced at City Council

Alley Adjacent to 235, 239 & 245 Bayard Avenue Proposed Alley Abandonment !Ò§ !Ò§ Ò ! § 505 516 × 554 t a nS 514 e rm 512 Ò§ ck !Ò! oo × § E L !Ò§ Ò ! § 508 . ! !Ò§ 506 §Ò ! Ò ! § . ! 222 × 221 456 Ò ! § !Ò§Ò§ ! 225 !Ò§ ya !Ò§ 216 Ba 229 rd e !Ò§ Ò ! § Av 235 222 !Ò§ !Ò§ × 239 Ò ! § 232 Ò ! § 236 !Ò§ 243 Ò ! § !Ò§ Ò ! § 391 !Ò§ 240 . ! !Ò§ Ò! 244 × § !Ò§ 413 250 340 Ò ! § !Ò§ 258 Legend 0 50 100 200 Feet Ò × Hydrants ! § Ò ! ¯ § Overhead Electric Pole Underground Electric Lines Overhead Electric Lines Date Printed: February 1, 2013 Water Main File: m:\gis_data\projects/tech_mxds Hydrant Line \st_abandonment_map_235_bayard_ave . Manholes ! Department: Public Works GIS Sewer Line City of Dover, Delaware Bayard Avenue Alley Dover Parcels

PETITION TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AND ZONING MAP Public Hearing before the City of Dover City Council March 11, 2013 Proposed Zoning Change: Amendment to Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 Section 22 AEOZ and Zoning Map to comply with the 2010 Air Installation Compatible Use Zone Study (AICUZ) Update completed by the Dover Air Force Base Summary of Amendment: Staff developed the proposed Text Amendment and Comprehensive Rezoning to comply with the 2010 Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Study Update completed by the Dover Air Force Base. A large portion of the text amendment is to reflect the updated Land Use Compatibility Table (Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 Section 22.6). The proposed Land Use Compatibility Table is more detailed with regards to specific uses within the AEOZ. The proposed Comprehensive Rezoning is based on the updated Noise Zones that reduce the size and location of the Noise Zones within the City of Dover. This rezoning will require separate action by the Planning Commission and City Council. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at their meeting of February 19, 2013. In developing the proposed ordinance, staff reviewed the Land Development Plan of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan to ensure that the Text Amendment and Comprehensive Rezoning are consistent with the policies to support and protect the vital interest of the Dover Air Force Base. These areas impacted by the Text Amendment and Comprehensive Rezoning are located on the east side of the city near the Air Force Base. Recommendation of The Planning Commission recommended that City Council Planning Commission: approve Ordinances #2013-01 and #2013-02 as proposed at their meeting on February 19, 2013. Ordinance Numbers: 2013-01 text Amendment to Zoning Ordinance 2013-02 Amendment to Zoning Map (Comprehensive Rezoning) File Number: MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendment: AEOZ (Airport Environs Overlay Zone) MI-12-24 List of Packet Items: • Summary o Background on Project o Chronology of Events o Sample of Letter of Workshop o Public Notice Advertisements o Citizens Brochure: Air Installation Compatible Use Zone Study Update o • Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 2-19-13 (draft) • AEOZ o Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 Section 22 Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) Proposed Ordinance #2013-01 (Final Reading) o Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance: Proposed Ordinance #2013-02 (Final Reading)  Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) Amendments 2013 Map • Exhibit Maps o Properties within Current AEOZ o Properties to be Removed from AEOZ o Properties to Continue to be within AEOZ • Summary Table Listing of Properties for Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ o Listing of properties to be removed from the AEOZ o Listing of properties to continue to be within the AEOZ

City of Dover Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendment – AEOZ Background on Project MI-12-24 On February 12, 2001, the Dover City Council adopted the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) as Article 3 Section 22 of the Zoning Ordinance. This section of the Zoning Ordinance is intended to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by identifying areas impacted by high levels of aircraft noise and the potential for aircraft accidents associated with airport operations and by regulating land use and the construction of buildings within such areas surrounding the Dover Air Force Base. The AEOZ is a zoning overlay used in conjunction with the underlying zoning for the property. In August of 2010, the Dover Air Force Base completed an update to their Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ). A copy of the updated AICUZ Study is available in the Planning Office. The Planning Staff began to draft ordinances to update the Zoning Map and Article 3 Section 22 AEOZ to comply with the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone Study Update. A large portion of the text amendment is to reflect the updated land use compatibility table (Article 3 Section 22.6). The proposed land use compatibility table is more detailed with regards to specific uses within the AEOZ. The proposed rezoning is based on the updated Noise Zones that reduce the size and location of the Noise Zones within the City of Dover. A list of properties proposed for rezoning was identified based on the new Noise Zones. The Chapter 12: Land Development Plan (including Map 12-1: Land Development Plan) of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan identified (pages 156-157) that the City should support and protect the vital interest of the Dover Air Force Base. Policies identified indicate that the City should restrict land use in accordance with the most current edition of the AICUZ and require noise attenuation measures for properties in the vicinity of the Dover Air Force Base. Policies further recognized the AEOZ within the Zoning Ordinance and the recognition of updates to the Zoning Map as needed to coincide with the most recent AICUZ document. The Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendments – AEOZ proposes to rezone 685 properties located near the Dover Air Force Base and to amend Article 3 Section 22 of the Zoning Ordinance to be in compliance with the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone Study Update. In an effort to ensure transparency in this process and allow time for public comment, the Planning Office sent out letters to property owners of all lands proposed for rezoning on October 24, 2012, explaining the proposal and offering the opportunity for affected property owners to attend a workshop on November 8, 2012 to meet with Planning Staff and the Community Planner from the Dover Air Force Base. The Text Amendment process follows the procedures for Zoning Text Amendments of the Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 Section 5.2 P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendment – AEOZ Background on Project MI-12-24 Page | 2 5.23 Report of the planning commission. Regarding each proposed amendment to the ordinance text, the planning commission shall provide a report to the city council stating a recommended action with regards to the proposed amendment, along with the commission's evaluation of the following factors: (A) Whether such change is consistent with the aims and principles embodied in the ordinance as to the particular zones concerned; and (B) Whether such proposed amendment is consistent with the aims of the comprehensive plan of the city. The rezoning process follows the procedures for Comprehensive Zoning Map Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 Section 5.4. 5.43 Report of the planning commission. Regarding each application for a comprehensive zoning map amendment, the planning commission shall provide a report to the city council stating a recommended action with regards to the proposed amendment, along with the commission's evaluation of the following factors: (A) Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change would be compatible with the existing uses and zones in the area concerned; (B) Whether adequate public services and infrastructure exist or can be created or expanded to serve the needs of any additional demand as a result of such change; and (C) Whether the proposed change is in accordance with the city's current comprehensive plan. City Council conducted its First Reading of the ordinances (Ordinance #2013-01 and Ordinance #2013-02) to accomplish the Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendments – AEOZ on January 28, 2013, referred the ordinances to the Planning Commission for public hearing and consideration on February 19, 2013, and set the public hearing and final action by City Council for March 11, 2013. The Planning Office sent mailed notices on January 30, 2013 to all property affected owners proposed for Rezoning informing them of the proposal and published advertisements in the Dover Post on February 1, 2013 and Delaware State News on February 3, 2013. The Planning Commission held public hearings for the proposed Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendments – AEOZ per Article 10, Sections 5.23 and 5.43 of the Zoning Ordinance at their meeting of February 19, 2013. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendments- AEOZ to City Council. City Council shall conduct a Final Reading and Public Hearing at their meeting of March 11, 2013.

Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendment: Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) Chronology of Events August 2010 Dover Air Force Base adopts Air Installation Compatible Use Zone Study Update. March 2011 to City Planning Staff drafts an ordinance to update the AEOZ based on the October 2012 adopted Air Installation Compatible Use Zone Study Update and identifies properties proposed to be rezoned based on the Study. (MI-12-24) October 24, 2012 Property owners with properties proposed for Rezoning were contacted by mail informing them of a workshop with Planning Staff to discuss concerns and to gather information. • Workshop Letter mailed to 502 property owners involving 685 properties. • Phone Inquiries: 14 • E-mail Inquiries: 3 November 8, 2012 Planning Staff along with the Community Planner from the Dover Air Force Base hold a Public Workshop from 9:00am-12:00 (noon) and from 4:00pm- 7:00pm. • 16 property owners stop by to discuss rezoning. January 28, 2013 The First Readings of Ordinance #2013-01 and Ordinance #2013-02 occur before the City Council and forwarded to the City of Dover Planning Commission for a Public Hearing at the February 19, 2013 meeting. A Final Public Hearing before City Council was scheduled for March 11, 2013. January 30, 2013 Property owners with properties proposed for Rezoning were contacted by mail notifying them of the Public Hearings scheduled before the Planning Commission and City Council and to contact Planning Staff to discuss concerns. • Notice Letter mailed to 502 property owners involving 685 properties. February 1, 2013 Legal ads were placed in the Dover Post and Delaware State News February 3, 2013 regarding the proposed Rezoning and Text Amendments. February 19, 2013 The Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendment: AEOZ is presented to the Planning Commission for the purpose of conducting a public hearing and formulating a recommendation to City Council. • The Planning Commission moved to recommend approval to the City Council for the adoption of the Text Amendment for the AEOZ finding that the amendment is consistent with the city’s Comprehensive Plan. Page 1 of 2 – Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendments: AEOZ Zone February 20, 2013

• The Planning Commission moved to recommend approval to the City Council for the adoption of the Comprehensive Rezoning associated with the AEOZ finding that the proposed rezoning is compatible with the uses and zones in the area and that the rezoning is in accordance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. March 11, 2013 Public Hearing is scheduled on Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendments: AEOZ before the City Council. Page 2 of 2 – Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendments: AEOZ Zone February 20, 2013

City of Dover October 24, 2012 1062 LAFFERTY LLC 207 JOHNCE RD NEWARK, DE 19711 RE: Change in Zoning Designation: From C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone C to C-3 1062 LAFFERTY LN Tax Parcel Number: ED05-086.00-01-07.00 Dear 1062 LAFFERTY LLC, On February 12, 2001, the Dover City Council adopted the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) as Article 3 Section 22 of the Zoning Ordinance. This section of the Zoning Ordinance is intended to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by identifying areas impacted by high levels of aircraft noise and the potential for aircraft accidents associated with airport operations and by regulating land use and the construction of buildings within such areas surrounding the Dover Air Force Base. The AEOZ is a zoning overlay used in conjunction with the underlying zoning for the property. In August of 2010, the Dover Air Force Base completed an update to their Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ). As part of the implementation process for the AICUZ, the Planning Staff has identified a number of properties where changes to the AEOZ zoning designation are necessary to achieve compliance with the AICUZ. We have also identified changes to the AEOZ regulations outlined of the Zoning Ordinance. Your property is located at 1062 LAFFERTY LN and identified by tax parcel number ED05-086.00-01- 07.00. The property is being recommended to be removed from the AEOZ. The underlying zoning of the property is not proposed to change as a part of this rezoning process. We are currently recommending that its zoning be changed from C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone C to C-3. The purpose of this letter is to advise you of the proposed change and to inform you of opportunities that you will have to ask questions and express your thoughts regarding our recommended changes. We will be holding a Public Workshop on Thursday November 8, 2012 in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover. There will be information on display from 9:00am-12:00pm and from 4:00-7:00pm. Staff will be available to address both specific property concerns as well as general questions about the process and the implications for the City. A follow up notification will be sent to you by mail when the dates for the Public Hearings before Planning Commission and City Council for this comprehensive Rezoning are established. All Public Hearings and announcements are kept up to date and can be viewed at www.cityofdover.com. If you have a concern with the recommended zone changes, this will be your best opportunity to discuss it with Planning Office Staff. If you have any concerns, I hope you will take advantage of the opportunities we are offering to discuss the zoning of your property. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call the Planning Office at (302) 736-7196 or email compplan@dover.de.us Sincerely, Ann Marie Townshend, AICP Director of Planning and Community Development P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

City of Dover January 30, 2013 AMISIAL,FRANCIENNE & MAXY,SAINTAMISE 3 NICHOLAS DR DOVER, DE 19904 RE: Change in Zoning Designation: From R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II to R-8, AEOZ APZ II 3 NICHOLAS DR Tax Parcel Number: ED05-068.20-01-55.00 Dear AMISIAL,FRANCIENNE & MAXY,SAINTAMISE, This is a follow up letter to a letter dated October 24, 2012 informing you of the City’s proposal to amend the Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 Section 22 Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) and Zoning Map as it relates to the boundaries of the AEOZ. This section of the Zoning Ordinance is intended to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by identifying areas impacted by high levels of aircraft noise and the potential for aircraft accidents associated with airport operations and by regulating land use and the construction of buildings within such areas surrounding the Dover Air Force Base. The AEOZ is a zoning overlay used in conjunction with the underlying zoning for the property. In August of 2010, the Dover Air Force Base completed an update to their Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ). Using this study update the City is moving forward with the amendments to the AEOZ and Zoning Map. As part of the City’s amendment to the AEOZ, a number of properties were identified to be rezoned. Your property is located at 3 NICHOLAS DR and identified by tax parcel number ED05-068.20-01- 55.00. The property is being recommended for a change to the AEOZ. The underlying zoning of the property is not proposed to change as a part of this rezoning process. We are currently recommending that its zoning be changed from R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II to R-8, AEOZ APZ II. Staff notes that some properties will have the same proposed zoning designation as the current zoning designations. This occurs as the location of the AEOZ Noise Zone on the property is changing. The purpose of this letter is to advise you of the proposed change and to inform you of opportunities that you will have to ask questions and express your thoughts regarding the recommended changes at two Public Hearings. • The Planning Commission will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday February 19, 2013 at 7:00pm in Council Chambers of City Hall at 15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, Delaware regarding the proposed rezoning. • City Council will hold a Public Hearing on Monday March 11, 2013 at 7:30pm in Council Chambers of City Hall at 15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, Delaware regarding the proposed rezoning. All Public Hearings and announcements are kept up to date and can be viewed at www.cityofdover.com. The documents for the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 Section 22 AEOZ and Zoning Map are also available for review in the Planning Office, City Hall 15 Loockerman Plaza for review. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call the Planning Office at (302) 736-7196 or email compplan@dover.de.us Sincerely, Ann Marie Townshend, AICP Director of Planning and Community Development P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

PUBLIC NOTICE CITY OF DOVER AIRPORT ENVIRONS OVERLAY ZONE AMENDMENTS The City of Dover Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on amendments to the Zoning Ordinance Article 3 Section 22 Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) and Zoning Map as it relates to the boundaries of the AEOZ, on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, located at 15 East Loockerman Plaza in Dover. Dover City Council will hold a final public hearing on amendments to Zoning Ordinance Article 3 Section 22 Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) and Zoning Map as it relates to the boundaries of the AEOZ, on Monday, March 11, 2013 at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, located at 15 East Loockerman Plaza in Dover. The proposed amendments are in accordance with the 2010 AICUZ Study Published by the Dover Air Force Base. These amendments are available for review at the Planning and Inspections counter in City Hall at 15 East Loockerman Plaza in Dover. Information is also available on the City’s website at www.cityofdover.com. During the public hearings, you may appear either in person, or by agent or attorney, and present any comments. Comments may also be submitted in writing via e-mail at compplan@dover.de.us or via U.S. mail at: City of Dover Planning Office P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Please call the Planning Office at (302) 736-7196 with any questions. Sincerely, Ann Marie Townshend, AICP Director of Planning & Community Development

CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION February 19, 2013 Excerpt from Meeting Minutes - Draft MI-12-24 Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendment: AEOZ (Airport Environs Overlay Zone) a) Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance: AEOZ (Airport Environs Overlay Zone) – Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council on proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to update the provisions of the AEOZ (Airport Environs Overlay Zone). This Ordinance amends Appendix B: Zoning, Article 3 Section 22 – Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) including the Land Use Compatibility Table. Ordinance # 2013-01. b) Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ Zoning – Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council on proposed rezoning of 685 properties in the eastern portion of the City by changing the boundary of the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) in accordance with the 2010 Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Study published by the Dover Air Force Base. The proposed changes involve revisions to the noise contours boundaries now as the Noise Zones A-D of the AEOZ zoning classifications. Ordinance # 2013-02. Mrs. Townshend stated that there were two (2) parts. One part being the Zoning Text Amendments and the Comprehensive Zoning Map Amendment associated with implementing the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ). She stated that an overview of the Text Amendment would be given first, along with a Public Hearing and then the changes to the map would follow. Mrs. Townshend stated that this a project that is being completed in accordance with the 2010 Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Study developed by the Dover Air Force Base. The Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) was adopted by City Council in 2001 and this is an updated of that Zone. Mrs. Townshend stated that the primary change in the text was that the former Land Use Compatibility Tables were removed and we inserted what the Dover Air Force Base has currently. There are no significant changes. Mrs. Townshend stated that in some cases, it breaks down things more clearly. The Text Amendment states what you can do in the different Noise Zones, the Accident Potential Zones and the Clear Zones. Mrs. Townshend further stated that changes were made to the purpose and intent in order to make it clearer. Mrs. Townshend stated that the most significant change to the text is under Tab AEOZ, page 2, lines 70-83. It currently states that additions to existing commercial buildings are permitted but limited to no more than 3,000 square feet. A practical example of where this was a problem was at Dover Behavioral Health. This project went to the Board of Adjustment in order to do an expansion of greater than 3,000 square feet. Mrs. Townshend further stated that in trying to prevent deferring that type of expansion to the Board of Adjustment, knowing that it is very limited in terms of that type of use and that a lot of what’s in the zone complies with the use requirements, they proposed a change. Additions to existing non-residential buildings designed for human occupation shall be limited to a maximum increase of 50 percent of the floor area. Mrs. Townshend stated that it is now more of a ratio approach. For instance, a 2,500 square foot operation cannot be expanded by more

Excerpt from CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION- DRAFT FEBRAURY 19, 2013 than double. She also pointed out that a large facility is still limited to 50 percent increase. This text amendment provides a check and balance that unlimited expansion is not applicable, by pro-rating the expansion based on the size of the facility. Mrs. Townshend stated that additions to existing non-residential buildings designed for storage warehousing and other uses not intended for human occupancy as a primary use, are unlimited in floor area. Typically, most of the warehousing uses are permitted but they wanted to make it clear that there is a limit on expansion for buildings intended for human occupancy versus buildings that are used for storage. Mrs. Townshend stated that when going through the process for both the map and text changes, they coordinated closely with the Community Planner for the Dover Air Force Base. All of the materials have been available for review and they have not received any concerns. She further stated that when the public workshop was held in November 2012, the Community Planner for the Dover Air Force Base did attend. The purpose of the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) is to protect the Air Force Base from encroachment of incompatible uses in the area surrounding the Dover Air Force Base. Colonel Welsh questioned if the Dover Air Force Base was in compliance with the purposed amendments? Responding to Colonel Welsh, Mrs. Townshend stated yes, the Dover Air Force Base had not stated otherwise and they have been working very closely with them. Colonel Welsh opened a public hearing. Mr. Donald Glanden – DHK, LLC 14 Starlifter Avenue Dover DE 19901 Mr. Glanden stated that he presently has a building located in the Industrial Park on Starlifter Avenue. He further stated that the zoning will continue to be zoned M (Manufacturing), but the Noise Zone is being changed from Noise Zone C to Noise Zones A and B. Mr. Glanden asked for clarification as to how that would affect their operation or how it affects their property? Responding to Mr. Glanden, Mrs. Townshend stated that in terms of their operation, the Noise Zone change does not affect any operation that is existing. The Noise Zones A and B are less restrictive than Noise Zone C. She further stated that Noise Zones C and D are the more intense Noise Zones. Primarily, especially as it related to the manufacturing type operations and warehousing type operations, the Noise Zone affects it in terms of building construction and the noise attenuation you need to construct the building to. Mr. Glanden further questioned if the zoning change would make it more difficult for new construction to come in to the Industrial Park? Responding to Mr. Glanden, Mrs. Townshend stated that it would not make it more difficult. With the change in the noise contours they are seeing a contraction of the Noise Zones. She further stated that the change would take away some level of restriction. Mr. Mark Dunkle – Parkowski, Guerke & Swayze P.A. 116 W Water Street Dover DE 19904 Mr. Dunkle stated that he was here on behalf of Dover Behavioral Health and that they fully support the common sense amendment and also appreciate the language. 2

Excerpt from CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION- DRAFT FEBRAURY 19, 2013 Ms. Kam Yeung – First State Billiard Inc 10 Maggies Way Dover DE 19901 Ms. Yeung stated that she currently owns a building located in Bryan Business Park which is a pool hall. She further stated that she was confused with the Noise Zone change. Responding to Ms. Yeung, Colonel Welsh stated that the zoning at ground level was not changing. The zoning change has to do with the flight path of the air craft and the noise and also the Accident Potential Area. Colonel Welsh further stated that these areas have actually shrunk, so if you were not affected before then you should not be affected now. Mrs. Townshend stated that there is an issue with this property since it is located within the Accident Potential Zone. She pointed out that the Accident Potential Zones have not changed with this amendment. With regard to the pool hall, it would be limited to the type of expansion. The building is now zoned as a public assembly, so it would not be a permitted use. Any expansion would be limited to 50 percent expansion of the existing area. Mrs. Townshend gave an example of a 5,000 square foot building; they would only be allowed to expand no more than 50 percent. Ms. Yeung stated that she was not looking for expansion; she is trying to sell the property. She further stated that her property is limited to the type of use that is able to be at this location. Responding to Ms. Yeung, Mrs. Townshend stated that this is not something that is changing. She further stated that the existing pool hall was a non-conforming use previously. The Planning Office has spoken with people about a number of things opening at this location. The reality is that the property is located within the Accident Potential Zone where even under the current language in the Zoning Ordinance, public assemblies or similar activities are prohibited from starting new. Ms. Yeung questioned if any other type of business could open at this location? Responding to Ms. Yeung, Mrs. Townshend stated that businesses can open. There are just restrictions on the types of uses at this location based on the issue of safety and how many people are going to be in the flight zone. Ms. Yeung stated that at the present time, her occupant load at this time is about 300 people. Mrs. Townshend stated that Ms. Yeung’s existing business is legal non-conforming in the zone. She further stated that that type of use can continue as long as the business does not cease for the period of a year. Colonel Welsh stated that if Ms. Yeung were going to sell the property and it remained a pool hall, then she would have no issue. Responding to Colonel Welsh, Ms. Yeung stated that due to the economy being so bad, no one has extra money to spend to keep the pool hall open. She further stated that she has potential buyers from India, who want to open a temple at the location. Mrs. Townshend stated that opening a temple at this location would be an issue in terms of both the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) and the zoning of the property, which is zoned C-3 (Service Commercial Zone). A public assembly would not be something permitted in the C-3 (Service Commercial) Zone. Colonel Welsh closed the public hearing after seeing no one else wishing to speak. 3

Excerpt from CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION- DRAFT FEBRAURY 19, 2013 Mr. Ambruso moved to recommend approval to the City Council on the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the updating of the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ), amending Appendix B, Article 3 Section 22, including the Land Use Compatibility Table, seconded by Ms. Still and the motion was unanimously carried 6-0 with Mr. Shomo, Mr. Holt and Dr. Jones absent. Mrs. Townshend stated that Part B of the Comprehensive Rezoning and Text Amendment was the Comprehensive Zoning Map Amendment. She stated that this was the map companion for the text amendment that was just discussed. Mrs. Townshend asked members to look specifically at the Exhibit Maps in their packets. She further stated that in an effort to answer any questions and concerns at the front end of things, the Planning Office held a workshop on November 8, 2012. A notice was sent to all property owners, inviting them to attend the workshop. She stated that a number of people did attend the workshop. Mrs. Townshend stated that what was being presented was a change to the Zoning Map based on the 2010 Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Study published by the Dover Air Force Base in August 2010. The primary change being made is on the second map. A number of properties (shown in purple) under the map amendment, will be removed from the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ). These properties would come out of the Noise Zone. She stated that the Accident Potential Zone I, Accident Potential Zone II and the Clear Zone do not change on the map but the Noise Zones change fairly significantly. There will be a number of properties coming out of the Noise Zones and then those which remain in the Noise Zones are shifting and contracting. For example, numerous properties are shifting from Noise Zones C and D to Noise Zones B or A. She stated there are also some properties under Noise Zones B and C, but the line shifts on the property. The primary impact that this has on properties deals with new construction and the noise attenuation that has to be built into the buildings. Mrs. Townshend further stated that the use restrictions are not changing. For example, going from a Noise Zone D or C to a Noise Zone B or A the restrictions decrease to a degree. She stated that all properties owners affected by this change have been notified multiple times. The first notification was for the Workshop followed by the official Public Notice. Mrs. Townshend asked members to look at page two (2) under Summary. She stated that when making a motion it would be important to hit the factors specified in the Zoning Ordinance that need to be considered. She further stated that for any Rezoning, the Planning Commission’s report needs to consider whether such change is consistent with the aims and principles embodied into the Zoning Ordinance as to the particular zones concerned. Based on the fact that this is being done in accordance with implementation of the 2010 Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Study published by the Dover Air Force Base, we believe that it is clearly met. Also, whether such proposed amendment is consistent with the aims of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Dover. There is significant deference to the Air Force Base given in the Comprehensive Plan and the importance of protecting the Air Force Base as an employer and also preventing encroachment of incompatible uses through the use of the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ). Section 5.43 states that the Planning Commission needs to determine whether the uses permitted by the proposed change are compatible with the existing uses and zones in the areas concerned. She again stated that this would be relieving a level of restriction 4

Excerpt from CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION- DRAFT FEBRAURY 19, 2013 rather than adding a level of restriction. In cases where a business may be legal non-conforming, the amendment does not change how that use continues or the fact that it could not be re- established if it were to expire. Whether adequate public services and infrastructure exist or can be created or expanded to service the needs of any additional demand as a result of such change. She stated that this is an Overlay Zone, so she does not see this being a concern. Also, whether the proposed change is in accordance with the City of Dover’s Comprehensive Plan. This ties into the concept of updating the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) in accordance with the current data which is very much consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's goals as it relates to the Dover Air Force Base. Colonel Welsh opened a public hearing and after seeing no one wishing to speak, closed the public hearing. Mr. Ambruso moved to recommend approval to City Council on the proposed rezoning of the 685 properties in the eastern portion of the City, by changing the boundaries of the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) in accordance with the 2010 Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Study, published by the Dover Air Force Base. These proposed changes involve revisions to the noise contour boundaries, known as the Noise Zones A-D of the AEOZ zoning classification, Ordinance # 2013-02. Also for the record, the proposed changes are consistent with the principles embodied in the Zoning Ordinance and the City of Dover’s Comprehensive Plan and the other criteria specified in the Zoning Ordinance, seconded by Ms. Still and the motion was unanimously carried 6-0 with Mr. Shomo, Mr. Holt and Dr. Jones absent. 5

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE #2013-01 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 2 3 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 22 Airport Environs Overlay 4 Zone (AEOZ) be amended by deleting the text shown in red bold strikethrough and inserting the 5 text in blue bold italics as follows: 6 7 Sec[tion] 22. Airport environs overlay zone (AEOZ). 8 22.1 Purpose and intent. 9 The airport environs overlay zone (AEOZ) is expressly intended to protect the public health, 10 safety, and welfare by identifying areas impacted by high levels of aircraft noise, and the 11 potential for aircraft accidents associated with airport operations, by regulating land use and the 12 construction of buildings within such areas. The AEOZ is further intended to preserve and 13 promote the integrity of the mission of Dover Air Force Base (DAFB) as a matter of local, 14 regional and national importance, by regulating development and land use within the specific 15 areas surrounding DAFB, and to protect DAFB from encroachment of incompatible land uses. 16 The AEOZ shall serve as an overlay zone that applies additional standards and requirements to 17 properties located therein. 18 19 (a) The AEOZ is based on information provided by the Dover Air Force Base’s Air 20 Installation Compatible Use Zone Study Update. The City shall work with the Dover Air 21 Force Base to update the provisions of this section as needed. 22 (b) In case of conflicting standards and requirements, the more stringent standards and 23 requirements shall apply. Uses prohibited by the underlying zoning designations of the 24 properties within the AEOZ shall not be permitted by this section. 25 22.2 Definitions. 26 (1) (a) Air installations compatible use zones (AICUZ): is a department of defense program to 27 achieve compatibility between air installations and neighboring communities. 28 (2) (b) Airport environs: is the geographic area that is affected by airport air traffic operations and 29 defined on the basis of those areas immediately impacted by aircraft noise of the 65 decibels 30 (dBs) and greater noise exposure areas as delineated by the current and approved DAFB air 31 compatibility use zone study. This area is represented as the airport environs overlay zone 32 (AEOZ). 33 (3) (c) Day-night average A-weighted sound level (DNL): is a cumulative aircraft noise index 34 which estimates the exposure to aircraft noise and relates the estimated exposure to an expected 35 community response; a 24-hour energy average sound level expressed in decibels (dBs), with a 36 ten-decibel penalty applied to noise occurring between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. 37 (4) (d) DNL contour: is an isoline linking together a series of points of equal cumulative noise 38 exposure based on Ldn metric. Such contours are developed based on aircraft flight patterns, 39 number of daily aircraft operations by type of aircraft and time of day, noise characteristics of 40 each aircraft, and typical runway usage patterns. 41 (5) (e) Decibel (dB) : is a unit of measure of sound pressure or intensity. 42 (6) (f) Ldn metric: is the average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, 43 obtained by adding ten decibels to the hourly noise levels measured during the night (10:00 p.m. 44 to 7:00 a.m.). 45 (g) SLUCM: Standard Land Use Coding Manual, U.S. Department of Transportation. 1

46 22.3 Accident potential zones and noise zones. The AEOZ is comprised of two basic regulatory 47 components: accident potential zones and noise zones. This section establishes three accident potential 48 zones and four noise zones. The boundaries of each of these zones are delineated on the City of Dover 49 zoning map and are further described as follows: 50 (a) Accident potential zones: 51 (1) Clear zone (CZ) is that area immediately adjoining the end of a runway and which 52 extends outward from the edge of the runway a distance of 3,000 feet and which is 3,000 53 feet in width )(1,500 feet to either side of the centerline of the airport runway); 54 (2) Accident potential zone I (APZ I) is that area immediately adjoining the outer edge of 55 the CZ and which extends outward from the boundary of the CZ a distance of 5,000 feet, 56 and which is 3,000 feet in width (1,500 feet to either side of the centerline of the 57 airport runway); and 58 (3) Accident potential zone II (APZ II) is that area immediately adjoining the outer edge 59 of the APZ I and which extends outward from the boundary of the APZ I a distance of 60 7,000 feet, and which is 3,000 feet in width. 61 (b) Noise zones: 62 (1) Noise zone A (DNL A) is that area within and bounded by DNL contour lines of 63 between 65 decibels and 69 decibels of noise pressure. 64 (2) Noise zone B (DNL B) is that area within and bounded by DNL contour lines of 65 between 70 decibels and 74 decibels of noise pressure. 66 (3) Noise zone C (DNL C) is that area within and bounded by DNL contour lines of 67 between 75 decibels and 79 decibels of noise pressure. 68 (4) Noise zone D (DNL D) is that area within and bounded by DNL contour lines of 80 69 decibels and subject to noise pressure of 80 decibels and greater. 70 22.4 Exemptions. The following uses and structures are exempt from compliance with the provisions of 71 this article section: 72 (a) Additions to existing one-family dwellings. Additions to existing one-family dwellings may 73 be permitted when all other applicable zoning district bulk requirements are met. 74 (b) Additions to existing commercial non-residential buildings. Additions to existing 75 commercial buildings limited to a maximum additional floor area of 3,000 square feet for 76 buildings designed and intended for human occupancy, and unlimited floor area for 77 additions to buildings primarily used for storage, warehousing and other uses not designed 78 or intended for human occupancy as a primary use. 79 (1) Additions to existing non-residential buildings designed for human occupation 80 shall be limited to a maximum increase of 50% of the floor area. 81 (2) Additions to existing non-residential buildings designed for storage, warehousing 82 and other uses not designed or intended for human occupancy as a primary use are 83 unlimited in floor area. 84 (c) Temporary uses. Temporary uses [which] include but are not limited to public gatherings, 85 celebrations and outdoor entertainment events are permitted, so long as the period of operation 86 does not exceed five days. 87 (d) Temporary structures. Temporary buildings and structures such as tents, pavilions, bleachers, 88 etc., that are not used for residential purposes, and which meet said applicable requirements as 89 contained within this zoning ordinance [appendix] are permitted, so long as such uses and 90 associated structures are constructed incidental to a permitted use. 91 (e) Agricultural uses, operations and structures. Agricultural uses, operations, and 92 buildings and associated nonresidential structures, and lands in agricultural production. 2

93 (f e) Accessory uses and structures. Accessory uses and structures incidental to a permitted 94 principal structure or use. 95 22.5 Land use and development standards. Any building or portion thereof constructed or placed within 96 the AEOZ after the effective date of this section shall, and comply[ing] with the following standards: 97 (a) Unless specifically exempted under [sub]section 22.4 above, land uses shall be permitted or 98 prohibited in accordance with [sub]section 22.6, land use compatibility table. 99 (b) Proposed structures situated within noise zones A through D shall be constructed with noise 100 attenuation features to achieve the minimum interior noise level reductions specified by building 101 type in [sub]section 22.6, land use compatibility table. 102 (c) In APZ I and APZ II, no structure may be erected over 60 feet in height, regardless of zoning 103 district bulk regulations of the individual zoning district. 104 (d) All building permit applications for construction of new buildings or building additions not 105 exempted under section 22.4, within AEOZ shall be accompanied by a written statement from a 106 licensed architect or engineer, which lists all construction materials to be used and the resultant 107 interior noise level reductions to be achieved. The written analysis provided by the engineer or 108 architect shall demonstrate that the proposed construction will achieve compliance with the 109 minimum required interior noise level reductions specified in [sub]section 22.6, land use 110 compatibility table. 111 22.6 Land use compatibility table. 112 TABLE INSET: 113 3

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY TABLE Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) AEOZ Zones Noise Zones Accident Potential Zones Land Use A B C D CZ APZ 1 APZ II 65-69 dB 70-74 dB 75-79 dB 80 + dB Single, Two, and Multifamily Y1 Y1 Y1 Y1 N N Y5 Manufactured Housing Y1 Y1 Y1 Y1 N N N RESIDENTIAL Hotels, Motels, and Lodges Y2 Y3 N N N N N All Other Y1 Y1 N N N N N Residential Retail Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Business Services Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Personal Services Y Y2 N N N N N Professional Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Services Professional Offices Y Y2 N N N N N All Other Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Commercial Manufacturing, Warehousing, Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Distribution NONRESIDENTParking Facilities Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 IAL All Other Industrial Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Hospitals, Nursing Homes Y2 Y3 N N N N N Other Medical Y Y3 Y3 N N N Y 3,4 Facilities Educational Y2 Y3 N N N N N Facilities Houses of Worship, Public Assembly Y2 Y3 N N N N N Government Y Y3 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Facilities Parks & Recreation Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 ALL OTHER USES Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N6 Y 3,4 Y 3,4 114 Y Land use permitted 115 N Land use prohibited 116 1 Interior noise level reduction of 25 db is required in subdistrict A, 30 db in subdistrict B, 35 db in 117 subdistrict C, and 40 db in subdistrict D. 4

118 2 Interior noise level reduction of 25 db is required for all areas where the public is received, office 119 areas, noise-sensitive areas, or where the normal noise level is low. 120 3 Interior noise level reduction of 30 db is required for all areas where the public is received, office 121 areas, noise-sensitive areas, or when the normal level is low. 122 4 Structures not exceeding 60 feet in height within APZ I and II. 123 5 Single-family dwellings with a gross density of no more than one unit to the acre. 124 6 Agricultural uses not prohibited by [subsection] 22.8. Land Use Compatibility Table Accident Potential Noise Zones in DNL dBA Zones SLUCM Name Clear APZ I APZ II A B C D No. Zone 65-69 70-74 75-79 80+ 10 Residential 11 Household units 11.11 Single units; detached N N Y5, 12 Y1,12 Y2 N N 11.12 Single units; semidetached and attached N N N Y1 Y2 N N 11.31 Apartments N N N Y1 Y2 N N 12 Group quarters N N N Y1 Y2 N N 13 Residential hotels N N N Y1 Y2 N N 14 Mobile home parks or courts N N N N N N N 15 Transient lodgings N N N Y1 Y2 Y5 N 16 Other residential N N N Y1 Y2 N N 20 Manufacturing Food & kindred products; 21 N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 manufacturing 22 Textile mill products; manufacturing N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Apparel and other finished products 23 made from fabrics, leather, and similar N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 materials; manufacturing Lumber and wood products (except 24 N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 furniture); manufacturing 25 Furniture and fixtures; manufacturing N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 26 Paper & allied products; manufacturing N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Printing, publishing, and allied 27 N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 industries Chemicals and allied products; 28 N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 manufacturing Petroleum refining and related 29 N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 industries 30 Manufacturing Rubber and misc. plastic products, 31 N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 manufacturing Stone, clay and glass products 32 N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 manufacturing 33 Primary metal industries N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Fabricated metal products; 34 N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 manufacturing Professional, scientific, and controlling instruments; photographic and optical 35 N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 N goods; watches and clocks manufacturing 5

39 Miscellaneous manufacturing N Y5,9 Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Transportation, Communications and 40 Utilities 41 Railroad, rapid rail transit and street N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 railroad transportation 42 Motor vehicle transportation N Y Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 43 Aircraft transportation N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 44 Marine craft transportation N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 45 Highway & street right-of-way N Y Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 46 Automobile parking N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 47 Communications N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 N 48 Utilities N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Other transportation communications 49 N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 N and utilities 50 Trade 51 Wholesale trade N Y5 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 52 Retail trade-building materials, N Y5 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 hardware and farm equipment 53 Retail trade-general merchandise N N Y5 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 54 Retail trade-food N N Y5 Y1 Y2 Y3 N Retail trade-automotive, marine craft, Y2 Y3 55 N Y5 Y5 Y1 N aircraft and accessories 56 Retail trade-apparel and accessories N N Y5 Y1 Y2 Y3 N Retail trade-furniture, home furnishings 57 N N Y5 Y1 Y2 Y3 N and equipment Retail trade-eating and drinking 58 N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 N establishments 59 Other retail trade N N Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 60 Services Finance, insurance and real estate 61 N N Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N services 62 Personal services N N Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 62.4 Cemeteries N N Y11 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 63 Business services N Y5,9 Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 64 Repair services N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 65 Professional services N N Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 65.1 Hospitals, nursing homes N N N Y1 Y2 N N 65.1 Other medical facilities N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 N 66 Contract construction services N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 N 67 Governmental services N N Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 68 Educational services N N N Y1 Y2 N N 69 Miscellaneous services N N Y5 Y1 Y2 Y3 N Cultural, Entertainment and 70 Recreational 71 Cultural activities (including churches) N N N Y1 Y2 N N 71.2 Nature exhibits N N Y Y1 N N N 72 Public assembly N N N Y1 N N N 72.1 Auditoriums, concert halls N N N Y1 Y2 N N 72.11 Outdoor music shell, amphitheaters N N N N N N N 72.2 Outdoor sports arenas, spectator sports N N N Y6 Y6 N N 73 Amusements N N Y9 Y1 Y2 N N 6

74 Recreational activities (including golf N N Y Y Y N N courses, riding stables, water recreation) 75 Resorts and group camps N N N Y1 Y2 N N 76 Parks N Y9 Y9 Y Y N N Other cultural, entertainment and 79 N N N Y2 Y3 N N recreation 80 Resources Production and Extraction 81 Agriculture (except livestock) Y8 Y Y Y7 Y7 Y8 Y8 81.5 to Livestock farming and animal breeding N Y Y Y7 Y7 N N 81.7 82 Agricultural related activities N Y Y Y7 Y7 N N 83 Forestry activities and related services N Y Y Y7 Y7 N N 84 Fishing activities and related services N N N N N N N N Mining activities and related services N N N N N N N Other resources production and 89 N N N N N N N extraction 125 126 Y - (Yes) - Land use and related structures are compatible without restriction. 127 N - (No) - Land use and related structures are not compatible and are prohibited. 128 Yx - (yes with restrictions) - Land use and related structures generally compatible; see notes 1-12. 129 NLR - (Noise Level Reduction) - NLR (outdoor to indoor) to be achieved through incorporation of 130 noise attenuation measures into the design and construction of the structures. 131 132 NOTES 133 1. Require NLR of 25dB for DNL A. 134 2. Require NLR of 30dB for DNL B. 135 3. Require NLR of 35dB for DNL C. 136 4. Require NLR of 40dB for DNL D. 137 5. Require NLR of noise zone and building location and site planning, and design and use of berms 138 and barriers can help mitigate outdoor exposure, particularly from near ground level sources. 139 Measures that reduce outdoor noise should be used whenever practical in preference to measures 140 which only protect interior spaces. 141 6. Require NLR of noise zone and special sound reinforcement systems are installed. 142 7. Associated residential uses require NLR of noise zone. 143 8. Structures are not permitted and personnel should wear hearing protection devices. 144 9. Facilities shall be low intensity. 145 10. No Passenger terminals and no major aboveground transmission lines in APZ I. 146 11. Excludes chapels. 147 12. Maximum density of 1 dwelling unit per acre. 148 149 22.7 Design standards. 150 (a) All buildings and structures to be constructed or placed within the AEOZ shall be situated on the 151 portion of the lot that affords the least noise impact to the proposed building or structure, wherever and 152 whenever practicable. Buildings and structures shall be designed and oriented to minimize exposure to the 153 noise source and should take maximum advantage of existing physical features to minimize noise impact. 154 Windows, doors and other building openings shall be located the greatest possible distance away from the 155 noise source. 156 (b) The establishment of active recreation areas such as game fields and playgrounds shall be 157 avoided within noise zones B through D. Landscape buffer plantings and related screening material 158 shall be used whenever practicable to deflect noise away from areas intended for human habitation. 159 22.8 Prohibited uses. In addition to uses prohibited by [sub]section 22.6, land use compatibility table, the 160 following activities are prohibited within the CZ, APZ I and APZ II zones of the AEOZ, including, but 7

161 not limited to:, :storage of explosives, hazardous or toxic materials/waste; aboveground transmission 162 lines; uses that release into the air any substance which would impair visibility or otherwise interfere with 163 the operation of military aircraft (dust, smoke, etc.); uses that produce light emissions, direct or indirect, 164 which would interfere with pilot vision; and uses that attract birds or water fowl, such as, but not limited 165 to, landfills, wastewater treatment facilities, and associated settling ponds, artificial marshes, dredge spoil 166 materials, sand and gravel dredging operations and open fish farming. 167 (a) Storage of explosives; 168 (b) Hazardous or toxic materials/waste; 169 (c) Aboveground transmission lines; 170 (d) Uses that release into the air any substance which would impair visibility or otherwise interfere 171 with the operation of aircraft (dust, smoke, etc.); 172 (e) Uses that produce light emission, direct or indirect, which would interfere with pilot vision; 173 (f) And uses that attract birds or water fowl, such as, but not limited to, landfills, wastewater 174 treatment facilities, and associated settling ponds, artificial marshes, dredge spoil materials, 175 sand and gravel dredging operations and open fish farming. 176 177 SNOPSIS 178 The proposed ordinance would update the Airport Environs Overlay 179 Zone in accordance with the 2010 Air Installation Compatible Use Zone 180 study published by the Dover Air Force Base. 181 182 Actions History: January 14, 2013 – Introduced at the Legislative, Finance and 183 Administration Committee 184 January 28, 2013 – First Reading at City Council 185 February 19, 2013 - Public Hearing at Planning Commission 8

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE #2013-02 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE 2 CITY OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE BOUNDARY OF THE AIRPORT ENVIRONS 3 OVERLAY ZONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2010 AICUZ STUDY PUBLISHED BY 4 THE DOVER AIR FORCE BASE. 5 6 WHEREAS, the City of Dover adopted the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) in 2001 to 7 protect the public health, safety, and welfare by identifying areas impacted by high levels of 8 aircraft noise, and the potential for aircraft accidents associated with airport operations, by 9 regulating land use and the construction of buildings within such areas; and to preserve and 10 promote the integrity of the mission of Dover Air Force Base (DAFB) as a matter of local, 11 regional and national importance, by regulating development and land use within the specific 12 areas surrounding DAFB, and to protect DAFB from encroachment of incompatible land uses; 13 and 14 15 WHEREAS, the Clear Zone, Accident Potential Zones, and Noise Zones identified as the AEOZ 16 on the Zoning Map and in Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 22 17 AEOZ are based upon information provided by the Dover Air Force Base. 18 19 WHEREAS, the Dover Air Force Base completed an Air Installation Compatibility Use Zone 20 study in 2010, which changed the noise contours in the noise zones surrounding the Dover Air 21 Force Base, and provided this updated information to the City of Dover; and 22 23 WHEREAS, the City of Dover Planning Office notified all affected property owners and held a 24 public workshop on November 8, 2012, to answer any questions that property owners might have 25 regarding the changes to the AEOZ; and 26 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY 28 OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 29 30 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map 31 and Zoning Ordinance of the City of Dover is amended by changing the Airport 32 Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) in accordance with the map presented to City 33 Council on March 11, 2013 entitled “Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) – 34 2013 Amendments.” 35 36 SYNOPSIS 37 The proposed ordinance would incorporate the changes to the Air 38 Installation Compatible Use Zone into the Zoning Map as the Airport 39 Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ). 40

41 Actions History: January 14, 2013 – Introduced at the Legislative, Finance and 42 Administration Committee 43 January 28, 2013 – First Reading at City Council 44 February 19, 2013 - Public Hearing at Planning Commission

RM-1 a r y￿ Suv a o lu ton Stat Lon g Poin t rn a Re v R-8 Hanc ock wy A k ins eH Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) - 2013 Amendments Hop 1 nton DRAFT A R-8 Thor Long roo k o Nich yb ia Sh a d Acac ROS Point R-8 las Teak Le x in g ton Fox RG-2 RG-1 Litl e Cr eek￿ CPO RM-1 R-8 Prospect Ke Corne dtree nto n r Roun t Pil o RG-3 MHP d ow Sha p er Cam eo Rege n t Co o R-8 RG-3 Signal Ingram B M o na r ch Hol m arrister es C-1 C-1A C-3 C-3 IPM CPO C-3 rta rd Barl r Mag g ies be Ro awfo wle s￿ Fo D Cr MC IO Ot State Kim sle t b e R-8 IPM P u Hw y 1 Ha r t on RM-2 C-3 Ho rs nc h e M ag R-8 nd eon Run Connector e po SC-3 Plu m M IPM M C-3 R-8 Wi Ho C-3 ck rs ep ￿ on r ty C-4 R-20 L affe d M M Ho rse nd sid en t C-4 M po P re Bay IPM IPM IPM Starlifer ￿ Galaxy C-4 on IPM gst Isle MHP Bay C-3 n v i d Hors C-4 Li eral an s ler R-8 e pond Em r Ev Fow le Si st R-8 Bar l Ca C-4 Mays Bay ￿ B ufan J anes t Pos R-8 le s Cor n er R-20 US Hw Legend y 11 3 Zoning US Hw Dover Boundary y 11 3 APZ I APZ II CZ SWPOZ Tier 1 SWPOZ Tier 2 SWPOZ Tier 3 Proposed Noise Zones A Contour Line 65 B Contour Line 70 C Contour Line 75 side D Contour Line 80 Bay Dover Parcels Ki t s A Hu m mo Bay c k￿ DRAFT de Bays i Map Created by: Planning Office Date Map Printed: 2-21-13 File Path: PS Data/Projects/AEOZ/Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) 2013 Amendments 0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 Feet

DRAFT R-8 Pl a za Current properties within AEOZ IPM Whiteoak do wl k ar M ou CPO A with current Noise Zones IPM-2 R-15 R-20 rn i ng M D ea ov R-8 e Pu rp le M Legend R-20 R-8 ar tin R-8 R-8 Zoning SWPOZ Tier 2 ROS hi teo R-8 nd SWPOZ Tier 1 ak RM-2 Towns e oon IPM-2 W Long Point S ch er A A SWPOZ Excellent Recharge Areas ROS RM-2 St at s Bo R-8 gg eH nc ind wy el M arin A APZ I ho A W rv er A 1 Ca ll we O ak itz C-2A r ind APZ II RM-2 Ni m o R-8 hite cD ind W O ld W l d￿ ir w Vonda M d W rfie Fa r ac oa R-15 M CZ e R-8 G a yT re rb rn Sta Aco th Ar Ba ay Dover ur y Parcels ed Eis e es nn R-20 ven KeCurrent Parcels kwithin RG-2 Str er AEOZ Ste ip ow Oa on RM-1 nh ley ad R-20 Pa Long Point R-8Br ite Do Tea s Frea o n h R v R-10 Suva Noise is Zone r W A o er r Ha r C-1 rty rna ary tion RG-2 ckford RG-1 lu Noise Zone B Acor n e vo ck SC-2 R-7 R R-8 Hanco C-PONoise Zone C RG-3 ROS k ins R-20 Hop A nton RG-2 C-4 R-7 Thor Noise Zone D n Nixo Cly m er ce ROS ruan R-8 Long Sp Acor n k broo Mi ts ch er RG-3 Sh ady ol as Nich t ls RG-1 R-8 Poin Ha R-7 Girl ROS lli R-8 Edgehill Wi R-7 ey l an d R-7 Scout Linde Acacia Teak L exin s Up ill gton Fox C-4 nh ple ee n Gr Ma R-7 R-7 RG-2 RG-1 Litl e Cr eek￿ io n n e rm a is Edge Loo ck RG-2 Div CPO C-4 nt C-1 R-8 rta mo Ma R-8 il ls ey o w ta R-8 Ha Aham SC-1 co Sw a ll Blue l an RM-1 Prospect SC-2 hil rm dw e R-10 ge at Ed ke Cal oc b ill Lo No Ke nh C-4 RG-2 Corne Ro nto n ll ree Hill r un G nH S n Joh w u nnBr a nt ot dtree e Du po CPO MHP il P ow n Ba b R-10 C-4 b RG-3 ow n n e ll Brown d Sha Bu Lady Bu g R-8 per Bay Cameo Coo SC-2 C-4 ou ard RM-1 Rege n t nd tre R R-10 IO JH e RG-1 IO IO RG-3 C-4 Ingram Moriarity Un ited C-2A M er Cou a rch Barrister y ntr Ba es Court H ol Mo n IO ROS Signal m Litl e Cr eek ￿ Litl e Cr eek￿ y IO C-4 R-20 Dupo C-1 C-1A nt v rtn￿C-4 R-8 C-3 IPM Ri River r Kent Ma C-3 er lle C-3 wg ill Mi IO C-3 rl CPO Co n Ba Maggi e s RG-1 Water Lev e He Blu RM-2 rta RG-1 be ord yC Sussex Ro wf Ots￿ r d w le g I s lan Cra et D IO rt Fo MC ou Lo n IO C-4 Ki Ha sl Collins m be Dupo rt o n Ri v nt R-8 IPM er C-3 ond K SC-3 sep e ar s RG-1 RGO n necto r Ho r n e y a ge C-4 e um M C-2A Blu ROS He n SC-2 Pl C-1A M u n Co C-4 Dupo nt eo M Bay nR IPM C-3 g bli R-8 Bulld o R-10 Pu unch P Wi C-3 afe C-4 ck Laurel cS 1 ty Hw y Pin e ￿ R-20 R-8 Hor R-8 R-10 n rt y se M ato State ffe po Lotus ort La nd nsp IO Tra re t nsi Sig C-4 Ever Tra en g ho R-8 nS rse M Ho p po nd IPM C-4 C-4 s evelt M C-1 o MHP ROS Ro R-8 IPM Gal IPM axy tor C-4 RG-2 nec Con R un C-4 Puncheon Bay IPM C-3 on Ho i ngst Isle MHP rs epo ROS v Li rald nd e r R-8 Em ns wle Ba rl v a Fo tle E s R-8 Sir Ca Bay C-4 R-8 Map Created by: Planning Office Date Map Printed: 10-24-12 File Path: DRAFT R-20 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet

DRAFT Ap ril R-8 Pl az a A Parcels to be removed from AEOZ IPM Whiteoak do wl k ar M ou M CPO R-8 ea rn i R-20 IPM-2 R-15 ng ov e Pu D rp le M R-8 ar ti n R-20 R-8 R-8 ROS hi R-8 teoa n d k RM-2 To wn se oon IPM-2 W Long Point S ch er A A oggs ROS RM-2 B M arin nc ind A R-8 vel ho A W er A ar C k Oa Stat ll C-2A ur we ind i te r eH Wh th o itz R-8 W Old wy Ar cD ind ir Fa rd w l d￿ Vonda 1 ac M W m oa Ni e rfie yT re rb R-15 R-8 G a M Ba Sta Acorn ay y ed nn e es R-20 Eis Ke Str ley Steven RG-2 ip ak ad on RM-1 Br eO R-20 Pa Long Point R-8 er Do Tea ea on hitRo ow Suva Fr s nh ve R-10 r is W r rr Ha rna C-1 rty d ary RG-2 tio n ckfor RG-1 n v olu ck SC-2 Acor Re R-8 Hanco C-PO R-7 RG-2 ROS kins RG-3 R-20 Hop A nton C-4 R-7 Nixo n m Thor Cly er ROS R-8 Long nc n Acor k lli rua broo Mi ts Wi o l as Sp Sh a dy Nich s ls Point R-8 Ha ch RG-1 Girl R-7 e ROS er Edgehill RG-3 R-8 ey Acacia Teak d C-4 Upl an R-7 Scout Linde L exin ill R-7 gton Fox le ee nh p n Gr Ma R-7 RG-2 RG-1 e e rm a n Litl e Cr eek￿ Edg RG-2 is io n Loo ck CPO C-4 nt en Div C-1 R-8 mo ard R-7 Ma rta g G R-8 il in Spr ls ey o wt a Ha Aham SC-1 R-8 co Sw a ll l ue nt hil Bl po ge an RM-1 Prospect Ed e Du rm dw at R-10 SC-2 cke Cal oo No b ill L RG-2 Ke nh C-4 Corne nto ll ee n Hill r Gr S Jo h n w u nnBr a nH ot e CPO il P n Ba b MHP ow C-4 b RG-3 d ow n n e ll Brown Sha Bay Bu Lady Bu g p er R-8 Cameo Coo ard SC-2 C-4 RM-1 ou R-10 Rege n t n d t re R IO JH e RG-1 IO IO RG-3 C-4 Ingram Moriarity ited M er Un C-2A Cou a rch Barrister Court ntr Ho lm o n Ba y es M IO ROS Signal Litl e Cr eek ￿ River Litl e Cr eek￿ y IO C-4 R-20 RG-1 Dupo C-1 C-1A nt Ke rtn￿ r R-8 C-3 IPM nt Ma C-4 lle C-3 ill Mi IO C-3 rl CPO C-3 wg en Ba Maggi e s Lev RG-1 Water Co RG-3 eH rta yC Sussex Blu be ord RG-1 Ro rt wf Ots￿ r ou d w le g I s l an Cra et Fo D IO MC Lo n IO en Ki sl in Coll s C-4 eH m be Ha IPM Dupo Blu rt o n Ri v nt RM-2 R-8 er C-3 Hor RG-1 RGO SC-3 a r s neagye Con nect ond Ke M sep or C-2A C-4 e um Blu n ROS He SC-2 Pl C-1A M C-4 Dupo R un nt M Bay C-3 g eo IPM R-8 Bu lldo n bli R-10 ch Pu P Ho C-3 un Wi rse afe C-4 ck Laurel po cS 1 Hw y nd Pine ty ￿ R-20 R-8 R-10 n rt y M ato State R-8 ffe Lotus ort La nsp IO Tra re t nsi Sig n Tra Ever C-4 en g R-8 Legend Sh o rse M Ho p nd IPM po C-4 s evelt C-4 M Zoning o MHP ROS C-1 Ro R-8 SWPOZ Tier 2 IPM IPM Gal C-4 or axy RG-2 t n ec SWPOZ Tier 1 C on Ru n C-4 Puncheon Bay SWPOZ ExcellentIPM Recharge Areas C-3 n H sto o rs ROS iv ing d Isle MHP Parcels to be removed from AEOZ ep o nd L ra l C-4 e er R-8 Em ns Fowl e a stl l Me APZ I Ba r E v Sir rlin Ca R-8 APZ II C-4 Bay CZ R-8 Proposed Noise Zones Map Created by: Planning Office A ContourLine65 Date Map Printed: 10-24-12 File Path: R-20 B ContourLine70 DRAFT C ContourLine75 D ContourLine80 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Dover Parcels Feet

A h ite O ak RM-2 DRAFT W O ld Vo n d a R-15 way s Parcels within AEOZ ip e S tr St A RM-1 at P R-20 Lo ng Po in t Te a eH S uva wy a r ty 1 rn a R-10 a ry tio n o lu ck A co r R ev R-8 H a n c o ROS k in s n R-20 Ho p Tho r me n to n A C ly r ROS R-8 Lon g A cor k b ro o o la s S h ad y N ic h P o in n R-8 ROS t L in d e A cacia Teak L e x in n gt o n Fo x RG-2 RG-1 Lit l e Cr ee k￿ CPO Ma r ta R-8 h a m A RM-1 Pros pe ct Ca l dw n e ll Co rne n to r S Ke R n H i ll w ot a RM-1 n dtr e e e N ou il P ob RG-3 w MHP do La dy B Sha ug p er R-8 C oo Cam eo IO RG-3 Ingram l m es a rc h M ar ga ret H oROS o n Sign al Co M R-8 u n try Litl e Cr eek ￿ C-1 C-1A IO IPM R-8 CPO C-3 C-3 e n C-3 r l eH Ba M aggi e s B lu RM-2 be rt a o rd r Ro d wf w le Ot n g I sl a n C ra e t Fo D IO s￿ MC Lo Ha sl Ki m be rt o n R-8 IPM Ke C-3 H or a rsn C o n nec t o r e y ge s ep a M o nd B lu SC-3 m P lu M e He R un n M C-3 eon IPM g ch R-8 B u ll d o P un C-4 Wi C-3 ck 1 Hw y t y￿ R-8 H o r t on ￿ S t a te R-20 L affer se M o rt a po Tra nsp nd IO n sit Tra Bay Ho M rs e po nd C-4 M IPM IPM IPM St arlif er ￿ G a lax y C-4 B ay IPM C-3 n sto i n g Is l e MHP L iv r a l d H o rs e er R-8 E m n s Fo w l e po n d a e Ev stl Bar l S ir Ca R-8 M ay s B ay C-4 Ja n e s R-8 Legend R-20 Zoning SWPOZ Tier 2 SWPOZ Tier 1 SWPOZ Excellent Recharge Areas Proposed Noise Zones A ContourLine65 Map Created by: Planning Office B ContourLine70 Date Map Printed: 10-24-12 File Path: C ContourLine75 DRAFT US Hw D ContourLine80 y1 13 Dover Parcels 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 AEOZ Parcels Feet US Hw y1 13

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 1R ED05-086.00-01-07.00 1062 LAFFERTY LN C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone C C-3 C-3 2R ED05-077.07-01-62.00 180 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 3R ED05-068.19-02-85.00 SHADYBROOK DR ROS, AEOZ Noise Zone A ROS ROS 4R ED05-068.19-02-85.00 SHADYBROOK DR ROS, AEOZ Noise Zone A ROS ROS 5R ED05-068.19-02-85.00 SHADYBROOK DR ROS, AEOZ Noise Zone A ROS ROS 6R ED05-077.11-04-55.00 452 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 7R ED05-077.11-03-16.00 308 REGENT ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 8R ED05-077.11-04-43.00 480 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 9R ED05-068.19-02-36.00 206 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 10R ED05-077.11-04-66.00 445 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 11R ED05-077.00-01-21.00 835 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 3 C-4, SWPOZ Tier 3 C-4, SWPOZ Tier 3 12R ED05-077.11-02-61.00 674 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 13R ED05-077.11-04-39.00 492 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 14R ED05-077.11-04-83.00 489 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 15R ED05-077.11-04-41.00 488 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 16R ED05-077.11-04-42.00 484 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 17R ED05-077.11-04-59.00 431 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 18R ED05-068.19-05-20.00 152 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 19R ED05-077.11-04-84.00 491 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 20R ED05-068.19-05-28.00 168 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 21R ED05-068.19-05-29.00 170 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 22R ED05-068.20-01-36.00 223 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 23R ED05-068.20-01-31.00 233 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 24R ED05-068.19-05-40.00 192 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 25R ED05-068.19-05-34.00 180 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 26R ED05-068.19-05-35.00 182 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 27R ED05-068.19-05-36.00 184 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 28R ED05-068.19-05-37.00 186 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 29R ED05-068.19-02-28.00 125 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 30R ED05-077.11-03-21.00 211 INGRAM ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 31R ED05-077.07-01-04.00 143 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 32R ED05-077.11-02-52.00 604 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 33R ED05-068.19-05-31.00 174 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 34R ED05-077.16-01-01.00 699 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 35R ED05-077.11-02-66.00 663 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 36R ED05-068.19-05-27.00 166 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 37R ED05-077.11-04-86.00 495 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 38R ED05-077.11-04-45.00 476 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 39R ED05-077.11-04-75.00 467 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 40R ED05-077.11-04-51.00 460 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 41R ED05-077.11-04-87.00 497 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 42R ED05-077.11-04-62.00 437 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 43R ED05-077.11-04-65.00 443 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 44R ED05-077.11-04-61.00 435 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 45R ED05-077.11-04-71.00 455 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 46R ED05-077.11-04-60.00 433 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 47R ED05-077.11-04-46.00 474 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 48R ED05-077.11-04-78.00 473 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 49R ED05-077.07-01-32.00 63 MORIARTY ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 50R ED05-077.11-02-79.00 565 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 51R LC05-068.00-01-06.00 LONG POINT RD RM-2, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 2 RM-2, SWPOZ Tier 2 RM-2, SWPOZ Tier 2 52R ED05-077.11-04-63.00 439 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 53R ED05-068.15-03-22.00 1437 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 54R ED05-077.11-03-49.00 121 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 55R ED05-077.07-01-40.00 47 MORIARTY ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 56R ED05-068.19-05-80.00 208 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 57R ED05-077.11-02-57.00 642 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 58R ED05-086.00-01-11.00 1171 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone A C-4 C-4 59R ED05-086.00-01-13.00 1235 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone D C-4 C-4 60R ED05-077.07-01-56.00 31 MORIARTY ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 61R ED05-077.07-01-17.00 169 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 62R ED05-077.07-01-60.00 58 MORIARTY ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 63R ED05-077.07-01-59.00 56 MORIARTY ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 64R ED05-077.07-01-54.00 27 MORIARTY ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 65R ED05-077.00-01-01.00 655 BAY RD RM-2, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 1 RM-2, SWPOZ Tier 1 RM-2, SWPOZ Tier 1 66R ED05-077.00-01-19.09 605 BAY RD RM-2, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 1 RM-2, SWPOZ Tier 1 RM-2, SWPOZ Tier 1 67R ED05-077.00-01-19.05 655 BAY RD SC-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A SC-3 SC-3 68R ED05-077.00-01-19.07 655 BAY RD SC-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 3 SC-3, SWPOZ Tier 3 SC-3, SWPOZ Tier 3 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 69R ED05-077.00-01-19.08 655 BAY RD SC-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 3 SC-3, SWPOZ Tier 3 SC-3, SWPOZ Tier 3 70R ED05-077.11-04-44.00 478 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 71R ED05-077.07-01-33.00 61 MORIARTY ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 72R ED05-077.11-02-84.00 529 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 73R ED05-077.11-02-21.00 622 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 74R ED05-068.20-01-57.00 1542 N LITTLE CREEK RD RG-1, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-1 RG-1 75R ED05-068.19-05-30.00 172 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 76R ED05-077.11-03-27.00 9 MORIARTY ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 77R ED05-077.11-04-80.00 479 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 78R ED05-077.11-03-54.00 131 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 79R ED05-077.07-01-61.00 184 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 80R ED05-068.20-01-28.00 239 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 81R ED05-077.07-01-58.00 46 MORIARTY ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 82R ED05-077.07-01-57.00 44 MORIARTY ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 83R ED05-077.11-02-59.00 658 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 84R ED05-068.15-03-58.00 1435 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 85R ED05-068.15-03-20.00 1433 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 86R ED05-077.11-02-63.00 690 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 87R ED05-068.19-05-41.00 194 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 88R ED05-068.15-03-30.00 1426 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 89R ED05-068.19-05-89.00 226 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 90R ED05-077.07-01-37.00 53 MORIARTY ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 91R ED05-077.11-03-18.00 312 REGENT ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 92R ED05-068.19-05-18.00 148 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 93R ED05-077.11-02-43.00 515 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 94R ED05-077.11-02-32.00 593 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 95R ED05-077.12-01-04.00 1132 S LITTLE CREEK RD CPO, AEOZ Noise Zone B CPO CPO 96R ED05-068.15-03-69.00 1418 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 97R ED05-077.11-02-30.00 605 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 98R ED05-077.11-04-50.00 462 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 99R ED05-077.11-02-41.00 535 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 100R ED05-068.20-01-46.00 203 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 101R ED05-068.19-05-81.00 210 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 102R ED05-068.19-02-26.00 120 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 103R ED05-077.00-02-02.00 S LITTLE CREEK RD MHP, AEOZ Noise Zone B MHP MHP 104R ED05-068.19-02-86.00 N LITTLE CREEK RD ROS, AEOZ Noise Zone A ROS ROS 105R ED05-077.11-03-25.00 203 INGRAM ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 106R ED05-077.11-04-53.00 456 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 107R ED05-068.19-02-34.00 101 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 108R ED05-077.11-02-49.00 582 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 109R LC05-069.00-01-07.00 LONG POINT RD A, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, SWPOZ Tier 2 110R ED05-068.15-03-28.00 1430 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 111R ED05-068.19-02-44.00 219 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 112R ED05-077.11-03-56.00 135 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 113R ED05-077.11-03-30.00 210 INGRAM ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 114R ED05-077.07-01-06.00 147 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 115R ED05-068.19-02-53.00 47 ACACIA PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 116R ED05-077.11-03-43.00 HOLMES ST ROS, AEOZ Noise Zone A ROS ROS 117R ED05-068.19-02-21.00 100 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 118R ED05-068.15-05-23.00 168 REVOLUTIONARY BLVDR-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 119R ED05-068.20-01-38.00 219 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 120R ED05-068.19-05-91.00 230 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 121R ED05-077.11-02-37.00 563 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 122R ED05-077.11-02-14.00 568 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 123R ED05-077.11-03-28.00 206 INGRAM ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 124R ED05-068.15-03-64.00 1428 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 125R ED05-077.11-02-85.00 521 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 126R ED05-068.19-05-56.00 157 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 127R ED05-077.11-02-90.00 980 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-1, AEOZ Noise Zone A C-1 C-1 128R ED05-068.15-03-55.00 1429 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 129R ED05-068.19-05-21.00 154 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 130R ED05-068.15-03-27.00 1432 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 131R ED05-077.11-03-46.00 115 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 132R ED05-068.15-03-65.00 1426 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 133R ED05-077.00-03-05.00 600 KRISKO CIR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B IPM IPM 134R ED05-077.00-03-04.00 700 KRISKO CIR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone A IPM IPM 135R ED05-077.11-02-39.00 549 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 136R ED05-068.19-05-88.00 224 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 137R ED05-077.07-01-08.00 151 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 138R ED05-077.11-03-55.00 133 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 139R ED05-077.11-02-56.00 634 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 140R ED05-068.19-05-50.00 169 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 141R ED05-077.11-02-06.00 510 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 142R ED05-077.11-03-31.00 118 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 143R ED05-068.20-01-37.00 221 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 144R ED05-077.07-01-03.00 141 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 145R ED05-077.11-03-38.00 101 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 146R ED05-077.11-03-15.00 306 REGENT ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 147R ED05-077.11-02-28.00 621 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 148R ED05-086.00-01-02.00 1011 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone B C-4 C-4 149R ED05-077.00-01-26.01 1011 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone B C-4 C-4 150R ED05-086.00-01-01.00 1007 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone B, SWPOZ Tier 3 C-4, SWPOZ Tier 3 C-4, SWPOZ Tier 3 151R ED05-077.00-02-01.00 1061 S LITTLE CREEK RD MHP, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B MHP MHP 152R ED05-077.11-03-47.00 117 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 153R ED05-077.00-01-28.02 540 LAFFERTY LN M. AEOZ Noise Zones B and C M M 154R ED05-068.19-02-37.00 210 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 155R ED05-077.07-01-64.00 170 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 156R ED05-068.19-02-22.00 104 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 157R ED05-077.11-03-42.00 109 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 158R ED05-077.11-04-77.00 471 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 159R ED05-068.19-05-26.00 164 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 160R ED05-077.00-03-02.00 201 STOVER BLVD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 3 C-4, SWPOZ Tier 3 C-4, SWPOZ Tier 3 161R ED05-077.11-02-89.00 972 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-1, AEOZ Noise Zone A C-1 C-1 162R ED05-068.19-02-31.00 113 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 163R ED05-077.11-03-36.00 102 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 164R ED05-077.11-03-48.00 119 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 165R ED05-077.11-02-07.00 518 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 166R ED05-068.19-05-52.00 165 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 167R ED05-068.20-01-29.00 237 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 168R ED05-068.15-03-52.00 1423 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 169R ED05-068.19-02-19.00 4 ACACIA PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 170R ED05-068.15-03-25.00 1436 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 171R ED05-068.19-02-51.00 43 ACACIA PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 172R ED05-068.19-02-35.00 202 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 173R ED05-077.11-02-33.00 587 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 174R ED05-077.16-01-03.00 695 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 175R ED05-077.16-01-02.00 697 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 176R ED05-086.00-01-14.00 1251 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone D C-4 C-4 177R ED05-086.00-01-15.00 15 BUFFTON DR C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone D C-4 C-4 178R ED05-077.07-01-29.00 193 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 179R ED05-068.19-02-29.00 121 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 180R ED05-077.11-02-40.00 543 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 181R ED05-077.11-03-40.00 105 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 182R ED05-077.16-02-01.00 420 LAFFERTY LN R-20, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-20 R-20 183R ED05-077.11-02-44.00 505 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 184R ED05-068.19-05-24.00 160 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 185R ED05-068.19-02-43.00 223 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 186R ED05-077.11-04-52.00 458 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 187R ED05-077.11-04-74.00 465 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 188R ED05-077.11-02-82.00 543 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 189R ED05-068.19-02-32.00 109 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 190R ED05-077.07-01-41.00 45 MORIARTY ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 191R ED05-077.07-01-16.00 167 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 192R ED05-077.11-02-78.00 573 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 193R ED05-068.19-05-19.00 150 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 194R ED05-077.11-04-79.00 475 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 195R ED05-068.20-01-35.00 225 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 196R ED05-077.07-01-28.00 191 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 197R ED05-077.11-02-69.00 637 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 198R ED05-077.11-04-76.00 469 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 199R ED05-077.11-02-09.00 532 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 200R ED05-068.15-03-51.00 1421 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 201R ED05-077.11-02-11.00 546 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 202R ED05-077.11-02-08.00 524 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 203R ED05-077.11-02-74.00 599 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 204R ED05-077.11-04-72.00 457 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 205R ED05-077.11-02-46.00 558 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 206R ED05-068.19-05-90.00 228 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 207R ED05-077.11-02-17.00 590 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 208R ED05-068.19-02-33.00 105 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 209R ED05-077.16-02-02.00 392 LAFFERTY LN R-20, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-20 R-20 210R ED05-068.20-01-30.00 235 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 211R ED05-077.11-03-39.00 103 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 212R ED05-068.19-05-33.00 178 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 213R ED05-077.07-01-11.00 157 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 214R ED05-077.11-02-87.00 503 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 215R ED05-068.19-05-32.00 176 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 216R ED05-068.19-05-86.00 220 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 217R ED05-068.19-05-22.00 156 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 218R ED05-077.11-03-44.00 111 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 219R ED05-077.11-02-22.00 628 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 220R ED05-077.11-02-23.00 636 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 221R ED05-077.11-03-29.00 208 INGRAM ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 222R ED05-068.19-05-15.00 142 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 223R ED05-077.11-02-38.00 555 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 224R ED05-077.11-02-27.00 629 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 225R ED05-068.19-02-41.00 226 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 226R ED05-068.15-03-61.00 1434 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 227R ED05-077.11-02-71.00 623 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 228R ED05-068.19-02-48.00 203 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 229R ED05-077.11-03-17.00 310 REGENT ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 230R ED05-077.11-02-80.00 557 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 231R ED05-077.11-02-60.00 666 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 232R ED05-077.11-03-37.00 7 MORIARTY ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 233R ED05-077.11-04-40.00 490 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 234R ED05-077.11-02-29.00 615 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 235R ED05-068.19-05-76.00 58 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 236R ED05-077.11-02-03.00 504 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 1 R-8, SWPOZ Tier 1 R-8, SWPOZ Tier 1 237R ED05-077.11-02-53.00 610 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 238R ED05-077.07-01-55.00 29 MORIARTY ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 239R ED05-068.19-05-38.00 188 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 240R ED05-068.19-05-42.00 193 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 241R ED05-068.15-03-67.00 1422 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 242R ED05-068.19-05-14.00 140 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 243R ED05-068.19-05-17.00 146 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 244R ED05-068.19-02-56.00 48 ACACIA PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 245R ED05-077.11-02-48.00 574 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 256R ED05-068.19-05-49.00 171 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 247R ED05-077.07-01-34.00 59 MORIARTY ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 248R ED05-068.19-05-79.00 206 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 249R ED05-077.07-01-18.00 171 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 250R ED05-077.07-01-20.00 175 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 251R ED05-068.19-02-46.00 211 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 252R ED05-077.11-02-55.00 626 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 253R ED05-077.11-03-23.00 207 INGRAM ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 254R ED05-077.16-01-07.00 683 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B R-8 R-8 255R ED05-068.19-05-48.00 173 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 256R ED05-077.07-01-24.00 183 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 257R ED05-068.19-05-54.00 161 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 258R ED05-068.19-05-78.00 204 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 259R ED05-077.11-02-75.00 593 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 260R ED05-077.11-03-34.00 106 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 261R ED05-077.11-02-16.00 584 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 262R ED05-068.19-05-72.00 50 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 263R ED05-068.15-04-51.00 1508 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 264R ED05-068.15-04-52.00 1504 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 265R ED05-068.15-04-54.00 1501 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 266R ED05-068.15-04-56.00 1509 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 267R ED05-068.15-04-57.00 1513 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 268R ED05-068.15-04-58.00 1517 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 269R ED05-068.15-04-64.00 1504 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 270R ED05-068.15-04-55.00 1505 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 271R ED05-068.15-04-59.00 1521 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 272R ED05-068.15-04-60.00 1520 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 273R ED05-068.15-04-61.00 1516 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 274R ED05-068.15-04-62.00 1512 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 275R ED05-068.15-04-47.00 1505 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 276R ED05-068.15-04-49.00 1513 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 277R ED05-068.15-04-46.00 1501 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 278R ED05-068.15-04-48.00 1509 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 279R ED05-068.15-04-63.00 1508 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 280R ED05-068.15-04-53.00 1500 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 281R ED05-068.15-04-50.00 1512 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8 R-8 282R ED05-068.15-04-65.00 1500 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 283R ED05-068.15-04-99.00 SUVARNA LN RM-1, AEOZ Noise Zone A RM-1 RM-1 284R ED05-077.11-02-15.00 576 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 285R ED05-077.11-02-35.00 575 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 286R ED05-086.00-01-09.00 1151 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise zones C and D C-4 C-4 287R ED05-068.20-01-09.00 111 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 288R ED05-077.07-01-26.00 187 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 289R ED05-068.19-05-92.00 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 290R ED05-068.19-05-94.00 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 291R ED05-068.20-01-01.00 100 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 292R ED05-068.20-01-02.00 102 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 293R ED05-068.20-01-03.00 104 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 294R ED05-068.20-01-04.00 106 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 295R ED05-068.20-01-05.00 108 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 296R ED05-068.20-01-06.00 110 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 297R ED05-068.20-01-07.00 112 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 298R ED05-068.19-05-01.00 114 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 299R ED05-068.19-05-02.00 116 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 300R ED05-068.20-01-12.00 105 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 301R ED05-068.20-01-11.00 107 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 302R ED05-068.20-01-10.00 109 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 303R ED05-068.20-01-08.00 113 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 304R ED05-068.19-05-70.00 115 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 305R ED05-068.19-05-69.00 117 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 306R ED05-068.19-05-68.00 119 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 307R ED05-068.19-05-67.00 121 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 308R ED05-068.19-05-65.00 133 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 309R ED05-068.19-05-64.00 135 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 310R ED05-068.19-05-63.00 137 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 311R ED05-068.19-05-62.00 139 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 312R ED05-068.19-05-61.00 147 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 313R ED05-068.19-05-43.00 191 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 314R ED05-068.19-05-66.00 131 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 315R ED05-068.19-05-60.00 149 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 316R ED05-068.19-05-59.00 151 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 317R ED05-068.19-05-58.00 153 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 318R ED05-068.19-05-57.00 155 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 319R ED05-068.19-05-03.00 118 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 320R ED05-068.19-05-04.00 120 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 321R ED05-068.19-05-05.00 122 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 322R ED05-068.19-05-08.00 128 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 323R ED05-068.19-05-09.00 130 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 324R ED05-068.19-05-10.00 132 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 325R ED05-068.19-05-11.00 134 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 326R ED05-068.19-05-12.00 136 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 327R ED05-068.19-05-13.00 138 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 328R ED05-068.19-05-16.00 144 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 329R ED05-068.19-02-45.00 215 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 330R ED05-068.19-03-01.00 1506 N LITTLE CREEK RD MHP, AEOZ Noise Zone A MHP MHP 331R ED05-068.15-03-21.00 1435 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 332R ED05-068.19-02-18.00 6 ACACIA PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 333R ED05-068.15-03-57.00 1433 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 334R ED05-077.11-04-56.00 450 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 335R ED05-077.11-02-51.00 598 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 336R ED05-077.11-02-18.00 598 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 337R ED05-077.11-02-65.00 669 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 338R ED05-077.07-01-38.00 51 MORIARTY ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 339R ED05-068.20-01-40.00 215 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 340R ED05-077.11-03-26.00 201 INGRAM ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 341R ED05-077.11-02-62.00 682 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 342R ED05-077.07-01-15.00 165 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 343R ED05-077.11-02-64.00 675 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B R-8 R-8 344R ED05-068.20-01-43.00 209 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 345R ED05-068.19-02-20.00 2 ACACIA PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 346R ED05-077.07-01-65.00 307 REGENT ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 347R ED05-068.20-01-27.00 46 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 348R ED05-077.11-02-70.00 631 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 349R ED05-077.11-02-67.00 655 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 350R ED05-077.07-01-14.00 163 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 351R ED05-077.07-01-23.00 181 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 352R ED05-077.07-01-22.00 179 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 353R ED05-077.07-01-21.00 177 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 354R ED05-077.07-01-13.00 161 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 355R ED05-077.07-01-10.00 155 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 356R ED05-077.11-02-34.00 581 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 357R ED05-068.19-02-40.00 222 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 358R ED05-068.19-05-39.00 190 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 359R ED05-068.20-01-45.00 205 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 360R ED05-068.15-03-63.00 1430 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 361R ED05-077.00-01-26.00 LAFFERTY LN IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D IPM IPM 362R ED05-077.11-02-42.00 527 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 363R ED05-077.11-02-47.00 566 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 364R ED05-077.11-02-68.00 645 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 365R ED05-077.07-01-35.00 57 MORIARTY ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 366R ED05-077.11-02-77.00 581 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 367R ED05-077.11-03-20.00 130 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 368R ED05-068.19-02-39.00 218 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 369R ED05-077.11-04-47.00 472 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 370R ED05-077.11-04-54.00 454 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 371R ED05-077.11-04-49.00 466 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 372R ED05-068.20-01-44.00 207 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 373R ED05-068.19-05-82.00 212 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 374R ED05-068.15-03-29.00 1428 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 375R ED05-077.11-03-45.00 113 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 376R ED05-077.11-03-57.00 137 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 377R ED05-077.07-01-66.00 305 REGENT ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 378R ED05-068.20-01-41.00 213 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 379R ED05-068.19-02-27.00 124 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 380R ED05-068.19-05-77.00 202 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 381R ED05-068.19-02-24.00 112 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 382R ED05-077.07-01-63.00 174 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 383R ED05-077.07-01-27.00 189 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 384R ED05-086.00-01-19.00 1106 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone C C-4 C-4 385R ED05-086.00-01-20.00 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C C-4 C-4 386R ED05-086.00-01-18.00 1080 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone C C-4 C-4 387R ED05-077.07-01-19.00 173 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 388R ED05-068.19-05-06.00 124 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 389R ED05-077.11-03-33.00 108 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 390R ED05-077.11-04-38.00 494 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 391R ED05-077.11-04-70.00 453 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 392R ED05-077.11-02-10.00 538 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 393R ED05-068.19-05-51.00 167 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 394R ED05-077.11-04-81.00 483 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 395R ED05-077.11-02-05.00 518 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 396R ED05-077.11-03-13.00 302 REGENT ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 397R ED05-077.07-01-09.00 153 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 398R ED05-077.11-02-25.00 698 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 399R ED05-077.11-02-76.00 587 ROBERTA AVE R-8,AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 400R ED05-068.19-05-44.00 189 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 401R ED05-077.11-02-88.00 968 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-1, AEOZ Noise Zone A C-1 C-1 402R ED05-068.19-05-07.00 126 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 403R ED05-077.11-03-14.00 304 REGENT ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 404R ED05-077.11-02-81.00 551 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 405R ED05-077.11-04-48.00 470 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 406R ED05-077.11-04-85.00 493 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 407R ED05-077.11-04-68.00 449 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 408R ED05-077.11-02-45.00 548 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 409R ED05-077.11-02-19.00 606 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 410R ED05-077.11-02-20.00 614 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 411R ED05-068.19-05-85.00 218 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 412R ED05-068.15-03-66.00 1424 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 413R ED05-068.19-02-38.00 214 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 414R ED05-068.20-01-39.00 217 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 415R ED05-068.19-05-25.00 162 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 416R ED05-077.07-01-25.00 185 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 417R ED05-068.19-05-73.00 52 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 418R ED05-068.20-01-58.00 1554 N LITTLE CREEK RD RG-1, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B RG-1 RG-1 419R ED05-068.19-02-54.00 49 ACACIA PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 420R ED05-068.19-02-30.00 117 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 421R ED05-068.19-05-45.00 187 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 422R ED05-077.11-03-50.00 123 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 423R ED05-077.00-01-27.01 580 LAFFERTY LN M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C M M 424R ED05-068.19-05-46.00 185 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 425R ED05-068.19-05-23.00 158 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 426R ED05-077.11-02-58.00 650 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 427R ED05-077.11-03-24.00 205 INGRAM ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 428R ED05-077.11-04-37.00 496 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 429R ED05-077.11-02-72.00 615 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 430R ED05-077.11-02-83.00 537 ROBERTA AVE R-8,AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 431R ED05-068.20-01-32.00 231 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 432R ED05-077.11-02-13.00 562 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 433R ED05-077.11-02-12.00 554 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 434R ED05-077.11-02-73.00 607 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 435R ED05-077.11-02-86.00 505 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 436R ED05-068.19-05-83.00 214 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 437R ED05-068.20-01-34.00 227 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 438R ED05-077.00-01-25.01 LAFFERTY LN IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C IPM IPM 439R ED05-077.00-01-25.00 640 LAFFERTY LN IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C IPM IPM 440R ED05-077.00-01-25.03 LAFFERTY LN IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C IPM IPM 441R ED05-077.00-01-25.02 LAFFERTY LN IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C IPM IPM 442R ED05-068.20-01-33.00 229 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 443R ED05-077.11-04-73.00 461 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 444R ED05-077.11-04-82.00 487 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 445R ED05-077.07-01-30.00 195 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 446R ED05-086.00-01-17.00 1166 BAY RD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone C C-4 C-4 447R ED05-077.07-06-99.00 NOB HILL RD RM-1, AEOZ Noise Zone A RM-1 RM-1 448R ED05-068.20-01-26.00 44 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 449R ED05-077.11-02-31.00 599 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 450R ED05-077.11-04-57.00 425 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 451R ED05-077.00-03-01.00 101 STOVER BLVD C-4, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 3 C-4, SWPOZ Tier 3 C-4, SWPOZ Tier 3 452R ED05-077.00-03-09.00 KRISKO CIR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone A IPM IPM 453R ED05-077.00-03-08.00 KRISKO CIR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B IPM IPM 454R ED05-077.00-03-07.00 KRISKO CIR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM IPM 455R ED05-077.00-03-06.00 KRISKO CIR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B IPM IPM 456R ED05-077.00-03-11.00 KRISKO CIR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone A IPM IPM 457R ED05-077.00-03-12.00 KRISKO CIR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B IPM IPM 458R ED05-077.00-03-03.00 KRISKO CIR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 3 IPM, SWPOZ Tier 3 IPM, SWPOZ Tier 3 459R ED05-077.00-03-10.00 KRISKO CIR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 3 IPM, SWPOZ Tier 3 IPM, SWPOZ Tier 3 460R ED05-068.19-03-02.00 1462 N LITTLE CREEK RD RG-2, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-2 RG-2 461R ED05-068.19-02-52.00 45 ACACIA PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 462R ED05-068.15-03-54.00 1427 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 463R ED05-068.19-05-47.00 175 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 464R ED05-077.11-02-54.00 618 ROBERTA AVE R-8 ,AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 465R ED05-077.11-04-67.00 447 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 466R ED05-077.11-02-91.00 982 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-1, AEOZ Noise Zone A C-1 C-1 467R ED05-077.11-02-24.00 644 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 468R ED05-068.00-01-06.01 N LITTLE CREEK RD A, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, SWPOZ Tier 2 469R ED05-068.00-01-04.00 WHITE OAK RD A, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, SWPOZ Tier 2 470R ED05-077.00-01-18.00 800 BAY RD IO, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tiers 1 and 3 IO, SWPOZ Tiers 1 and 3 IO, SWPOZ Tiers 1 and 3 471R ED05-077.00-01-23.00 BAY RD M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C M M 472R ED05-077.11-03-51.00 125 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 473R ED05-068.19-05-74.00 54 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 474R ED05-068.19-02-55.00 50 ACACIA PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 475R ED05-077.16-01-06.00 689 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B R-8 R-8 476R ED05-077.11-02-26.00 635 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 477R ED05-068.19-05-75.00 56 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 478R ED05-077.11-04-58.00 429 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 479R ED05-077.11-04-88.00 499 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 480R ED05-068.20-01-25.00 42 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 481R ED05-068.20-01-24.00 40 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 482R ED05-068.20-01-13.00 103 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 483R ED05-068.19-05-84.00 216 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 484R ED05-068.15-03-19.00 1431 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 485R ED05-077.11-03-22.00 209 INGRAM ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 486R ED05-077.11-03-53.00 129 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 487R ED05-086.00-01-05.00 1008 LAFFERTY LN C-4, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C C-4 C-4 488R ED05-068.15-03-56.00 1431 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 489R ED05-068.15-03-68.00 1420 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 490R ED05-077.11-04-36.00 498 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 491R ED05-068.15-03-53.00 1425 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 492R ED05-077.12-01-02.00 521 OTIS DR C-1A, C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B C-1A and C-3 C-1A and C-3 493R ED05-077.16-02-03.01 LAFFERTY LN M, AEOZ Noise Zone B M M 494R ED05-077.11-02-92.00 994 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A C-3 C-3 495R ED05-077.07-01-36.00 55 MORIARTY ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 496R ED05-077.00-01-18.01 69 TRANSPORTATION LN IO, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 3 IO, SWPOZ Tier 3 IO, SWPOZ Tier 3 497R ED05-068.15-03-62.00 1432 HOPKINS AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 498R ED05-077.07-01-53.00 25 MORIARTY ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 499R ED05-077.16-01-05.00 691 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B R-8 R-8 500R ED05-077.16-01-04.00 693 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B R-8 R-8 501R ED05-077.11-03-19.00 144 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 502R ED05-077.11-02-04.00 510 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 1 R-8, SWPOZ Tier 1 R-8, SWPOZ Tier 1 503R ED05-068.19-05-87.00 222 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 504R ED05-077.11-03-52.00 127 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 505R ED05-077.07-01-31.00 65 MORIARTY ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 506R ED05-077.11-03-35.00 104 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 507R ED05-077.12-01-03.00 1100 S LITTLE CREEK RD CPO, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B CPO CPO 508R ED05-077.11-04-64.00 441 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 509R ED05-068.19-02-47.00 207 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 510R ED05-068.19-02-25.00 116 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be removed ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 511R ED05-077.11-02-50.00 590 ROBERTA AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 512R ED05-077.11-03-32.00 112 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 513R ED05-068.19-05-71.00 48 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 514R ED05-068.19-02-42.00 225 SHADYBROOK DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 515R ED05-077.07-01-07.00 149 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 516R ED05-077.07-01-05.00 145 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 517R ED05-077.07-01-02.00 139 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 518R ED05-077.11-02-36.00 569 CRAWFORD AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 519R ED05-077.11-03-41.00 107 HOLMES ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 520R ED05-068.19-05-53.00 163 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 521R ED05-077.11-04-69.00 451 BARRISTER PL RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 522R ED05-068.19-02-23.00 108 TEAK CT R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 523R ED05-068.15-03-26.00 1434 S HANCOCK AVE R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 524R ED05-077.07-01-12.00 159 HOLMES ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 525R ED05-068.19-05-55.00 159 LEXINGTON PL R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 526R ED05-077.07-01-39.00 49 MORIARTY ST RG-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A RG-3 RG-3 527R ED05-068.20-01-42.00 211 THORNTON ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-8 R-8 City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be remain ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 1C ED05-068.20-01-55.00 3 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 2C ED05-087.06-01-18.00 1161 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C 3C ED05-087.06-01-17.00 1171 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 4C ED05-087.06-01-04.00 1080 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 5C ED05-068.20-01-52.00 15 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 6C ED05-077.16-02-12.03 131 ROSEMARY RD M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II 7C ED05-077.12-01-09.00 1256 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II 8C ED05-077.12-01-08.00 1236 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II C-3, AEOZ APZ II C-3, AEOZ APZ II 9C ED05-078.00-01-08.01 S LITTLE CREEK RD IO, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II, SWPOZ Tier 1 IO, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II, SWPOZ Tier 1 IO, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II, SWPOZ Tier 1 10C ED05-078.00-01-08.02 HORSEPOND RD IO, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II IO, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II IO, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II 11C ED05-078.13-01-17.00 1059 HORSEPOND RD C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ I C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I 12C ED05-078.13-01-14.00 1084 HORSEPOND RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I 13C ED05-068.20-01-22.00 28 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 14C ED05-078.00-01-10.06 MAGGIES WAY C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II 15C ED05-078.00-01-10.07 HORSEPOND RD C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II 16C ED05-078.00-01-10.04 15 MAGGIES WAY C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II 17C ED05-078.00-01-10.02 5 MAGGIES WAY C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II 18C ED05-078.00-01-10.05 25 MAGGIES WAY C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II 19C ED05-078.00-01-10.03 24 MAGGIES WAY C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II 20C ED05-077.16-02-10.00 848 HORSEPOND RD M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II 21C ED05-087.06-01-16.00 1183 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 22C ED05-087.00-01-03.00 1757 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 23C ED05-087.06-01-22.00 1131 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 24C ED05-068.20-01-54.00 7 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 25C ED05-068.00-01-07.00 N LITTLE CREEK RD A, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II, SWPOZ Tier 2 26C ED05-096.00-01-01.00 143 BAY RD A, AEOZ Noise Zone A A, AEOZ Noise Zone B A, AEOZ Noise Zone B 27C ED05-078.00-01-10.01 10 MAGGIES WAY C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II 28C ED05-086.00-01-08.01 BAY RD MHP, AEOZ Noise Zone D MHP, AEOZ Noise Zone A MHP, AEOZ Noise Zone A 29C ED05-078.00-01-09.00 1500 S LITTLE CREEK RD IO, AEOZ Noise Zone B, AZP II, SWPOZ Tier 1 IO, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II, SWPOZ Tier 1 IO, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II, SWPOZ Tier 1 30C ED05-087.00-01-05.01 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 31C ED05-087.00-01-07.26 235 GALAXY DR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 32C LC05-069.00-01-08.01 LONG POINT RD A, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, SWPOZ Tier 2 33C ED05-087.00-01-07.17 34 STARLIFTER AVE IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 34C ED05-068.20-01-49.00 27 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 35C ED05-077.00-01-29.00 119 LAFFERTY LN M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ I 36C ED05-087.00-01-07.15 14 STARLIFTER AVE IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 37C ED05-078.13-01-08.00 16 WICK ST R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I 38C ED05-078.13-01-10.00 HORSEPOND RD M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I 39C ED05-087.00-01-06.00 BAY RD R-20, AEOZ Noise Zones A, B, C and D, CZ, APZ I, SWPOZ Tier 3 R-20, AEOZ Noise Zones A, B, C and D, CZ, APZ I, SWPOZ Tier 3 R-20, AEOZ Noise Zones A, B, C and D, CZ, APZ I, SWPOZ Tier 3 40C ED05-087.00-01-01.00 30 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ 41C ED05-078.13-01-12.00 1046 HORSEPOND RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I R-8 AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8 AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I 42C ED05-077.00-01-28.03 30 LAFFERTY LN M, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zone A, and APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zone A, and APZ I 43C ED05-077.00-01-28.00 LAFFERTY LN M, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D, CZ and APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones A, B, C and D, CZ and APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones A, B, C and D, CZ and APZ I 44C ED05-087.06-01-25.00 1075 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C 45C ED05-068.20-01-15.00 12 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 46C ED05-087.06-01-05.00 1100 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 47C ED05-087.06-01-24.00 1087 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be remain ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 48C ED05-078.13-01-09.00 1100 HORSEPOND RD M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I 49C ED05-087.06-01-26.00 1065 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 50C ED05-077.12-01-06.01 1196 S LITTLE CREEK RD M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II 51C ED05-077.12-01-12.00 1276 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II 52C ED05-078.13-01-03.00 50 BULLDOG DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise zones B and C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise zones B and C, APZ I 53C ED05-078.00-01-07.00 1175 HORSEPOND RD M, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ I 54C ED05-078.13-01-01.00 53 LAFFERTY LN R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ I 55C ED05-068.20-01-17.00 16 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 56C ED05-087.06-01-13.00 1230 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 57C ED05-087.06-01-15.00 1197 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 58C ED05-087.06-01-12.00 1212 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 59C ED05-087.06-01-09.00 1162 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C 60C ED05-068.20-01-47.00 39 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 61C ED05-078.13-01-05.00 958 HORSEPOND RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I 62C ED05-078.13-01-04.00 67 BULLDOG DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C APZ I 63C ED05-087.06-01-14.00 11 JANES CIR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 64C ED05-068.20-01-61.00 1600 N LITTLE CREEK RD CPO, AEOZ Noise Zones B, APZ II CPO, AEOZ APZ II CPO, AEOZ APZ II 65C ED05-068.20-01-62.00 N LITTLE CREEK RD CPO, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II CPO, AEOZ APZ II CPO, AEOZ APZ II 66C ED05-087.06-01-32.00 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 67C ED05-087.06-01-03.00 1046 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 68C ED05-087.06-01-27.00 1049 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 69C ED05-077.16-02-11.00 730 HORSEPOND RD C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II 70C ED05-087.00-01-07.14 110 GALAXY DR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 71C ED05-087.00-01-07.13 118 GALAXY DR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 72C ED05-087.00-01-05.00 52 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B, C and D, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B, C and D, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B, C and D, CZ 73C ED05-087.00-01-07.00 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C 74C ED05-087.00-01-07.24 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 75C ED05-087.00-01-07.18 40 STARLIFTER AVE IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 76C ED05-087.00-01-07.03 33 LAFFERTY LN IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C 77C ED05-087.00-01-07.04 51 STARLIFTER AVE IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C 78C ED05-087.00-01-07.22 GALAXY DR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 79C ED05-087.00-01-07.12 GALAXY DR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 80C ED05-087.00-01-07.23 GALAXY DR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 81C ED05-087.00-01-07.02 25 STARLIFTER AVE IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C 82C ED05-078.13-01-02.00 23 LAFFERTY LN R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I 83C ED05-086.00-01-08.00 1131 S BAY RD C-4, MHP, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D C-4, MHP, AEOZ Noise Zone A C-4, MHP, AEOZ Noise Zone A 84C ED05-077.12-01-06.00 1180 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-3, M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II C-3, M, AEOZ APZ II C-3, M, AEOZ APZ II 85C ED05-077.16-02-06.00 150 LAFFERTY LN M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I and APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zone A APZ I and APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zone A APZ I and APZ II 86C ED05-077.12-01-06.00 1180 S LITTLE CREEK RD M, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II M, AEOZ APZ II M, AEOZ APZ II 87C ED05-068.20-01-56.00 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 88C ED05-068.19-05-93.00 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 89C ED05-068.20-01-53.00 11 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 90C ED05-068.20-01-51.00 19 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 91C ED05-068.20-01-19.00 22 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 92C ED05-068.20-01-50.00 23 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 93C ED05-068.20-01-23.00 30 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 94C ED05-077.12-01-07.00 1240 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II C-3, AEOZ APZ II C-3, AEOZ APZ II City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be remain ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 95C ED05-077.12-01-10.00 1246 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II C-3, AEOZ APZ II C-3, AEOZ APZ II 96C ED05-078.13-01-13.00 1062 HORSEPOND RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I 97C ED05-077.00-01-28.04 LAFFERTY LN M, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ I 98C ED05-087.06-01-07.00 1130 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 99C ED05-068.20-01-60.00 1572 N LITTLE CREEK RD RG-1, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II RG-1, AEOZ APZ II RG-1, AEOZ APZ II 100C ED05-068.20-01-59.00 1566 N LITTLE CREEK RD RG-1, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ II RG-1, AEOZ APZ II RG-1, AEOZ APZ II 101C ED05-077.16-02-12.00 122 ROSEMARY RD M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, and APZ I and II M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I and II M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I and II 102C ED05-087.06-01-08.00 1144 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 103C ED05-077.00-01-27.00 141 LAFFERTY LN IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ I 104C ED05-087.00-01-07.16 26 STARLIFTER AVE IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B 105C ED05-078.13-01-07.00 HORSEPOND RD M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I 106C ED05-078.13-01-06.00 71 BULLDOG DR M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I 107C ED05-087.06-01-29.00 2040 HORSEPOND RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 108C ED05-077.16-02-09.00 858 HORSEPOND RD C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I and APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I and APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I and APZ II 109C ED05-068.20-01-48.00 31 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 110C ED05-087.06-01-02.00 1030 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 111C ED05-078.13-01-15.00 1122 HORSEPOND RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I 112C ED05-077.00-02-03.00 N LITTLE CREEK RD RM-1, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B APZ 1 RM-1, AEOZ APZ I RM-1, AEOZ APZ I 113C ED05-078.13-01-11.00 1026 HORSEPOND RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I 114C ED05-087.06-01-10.00 1182 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 115C ED05-077.16-02-07.00 136 LAFFERTY LN R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ I R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ I 116C ED05-077.16-02-12.01 110 LAFFERTY LN M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ I M, AEOZ Noise Zone B, APZ I 117C ED05-077.16-02-12.02 119 ROSEMARY RD M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I and APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ I and APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ I and APZ II 118C ED05-087.06-01-28.00 2022 HORSEPOND RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 119C ED05-087.06-01-20.00 1137 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 120C LC05-069.00-01-08.00 LONG POINT RD A, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 2 A, AEOZ Noise Zone A, SWPOZ Tier 2 121C ED05-087.00-01-08.00 2199 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D 122C ED05-096.00-01-02.00 3 BAY RD R-20, AEOZ Noise Zone A R-20, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-20, AEOZ Noise Zone B 123C ED05-087.00-01-09.00 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone D IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone D IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone D 124C ED05-087.00-01-07.01 60 STARLIFTER AVE IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones A B and C, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ 125C ED05-068.20-01-20.00 24 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 126C ED05-068.20-01-21.00 26 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 127C ED05-077.12-01-11.00 S LITTLE CREEK RD C-3, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II C-3, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II 128C ED05-068.20-01-18.00 18 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 129C ED05-078.00-01-01.00 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I 130C ED05-078.00-01-01.03 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I 131C ED05-078.00-01-01.02 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I 132C ED05-078.00-01-02.00 1262 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I 133C ED05-078.00-01-03.00 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B, C and D, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B, C and D, APZ I 134C ED05-078.00-01-01.01 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I 135C ED05-087.00-01-02.00 10 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ 136C ED05-087.00-01-04.00 1766 HORSEPOND RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B 137C ED05-087.06-01-21.00 1125 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 138C ED05-087.06-01-06.00 1116 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 139C ED05-087.06-01-19.00 1149 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 140C ED05-087.06-01-30.00 2054 HORSEPOND RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C 141C ED05-078.00-01-06.00 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone B City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

Comprehensive Rezoning: AEOZ - Properties to be remain ID PARCELID Property Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning PC Recommendation City Council Action 142C ED05-078.00-01-05.00 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ and APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ and APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ and APZ I 143C ED05-077.16-02-05.00 LAFFERTY LN M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I and II M, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ I and II M, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ I and II 144C ED05-068.20-01-16.00 14 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II 145C ED05-078.00-01-08.00 725 HORSEPOND RD APT JONES IO, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II IO, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II IO, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II 146C ED05-077.00-01-27.02 BAY RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone D, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone A and B, APZ I IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone A and B, APZ I 147C ED05-087.00-01-05.02 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone D, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ 148C ED05-087.00-01-05.03 HORSEPOND RD IPM, AEOZ Nose Zones C and D, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, CZ 149C ED05-077.00-01-28.01 BAY RD M, AEOZ Noise Zone D, CZ M, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D, CZ M, AEOZ Noise Zones C and D, CZ 150C ED05-077.00-01-28.01 BAY RD M, AEOZ Noise Zone D, CZ M, AEOZ Noise Zones A, B, C and D, CZ M, AEOZ Noise Zones A, B, C and D, CZ 151C ED05-087.06-01-01.00 1986 HORSEPOND RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 152C ED05-078.13-01-19.00 HORSEPOND RD M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ II M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ II 153C ED05-078.13-01-18.00 883 HORSEPOND RD APT C M, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ I and II M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I and II M, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ I and II 154C ED05-077.12-01-13.00 1277 MCD DR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones B and C, APZ II IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II IPM, AEOZ Noise Zones A and B, APZ II 155C ED05-077.12-01-13.00 1277 MCD DR IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone C, APZ II IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II IPM, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II 156C ED05-087.06-01-23.00 1099 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 157C ED05-087.06-01-11.00 1196 JANES RD R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone C R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone B 158C ED05-068.20-01-14.00 10 NICHOLAS DR R-8, AEOZ Noise Zone A, APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II R-8, AEOZ APZ II City Council March 11, 2013 MI-12-24

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE #2013-01 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 2 3 That Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 22 Airport Environs Overlay 4 Zone (AEOZ) be amended by deleting the text shown in red bold strikethrough and inserting the 5 text in blue bold italics as follows: 6 7 Sec[tion] 22. Airport environs overlay zone (AEOZ). 8 22.1 Purpose and intent. 9 The airport environs overlay zone (AEOZ) is expressly intended to protect the public health, 10 safety, and welfare by identifying areas impacted by high levels of aircraft noise, and the 11 potential for aircraft accidents associated with airport operations, by regulating land use and the 12 construction of buildings within such areas. The AEOZ is further intended to preserve and 13 promote the integrity of the mission of Dover Air Force Base (DAFB) as a matter of local, 14 regional and national importance, by regulating development and land use within the specific 15 areas surrounding DAFB, and to protect DAFB from encroachment of incompatible land uses. 16 The AEOZ shall serve as an overlay zone that applies additional standards and requirements to 17 properties located therein. 18 19 (a) The AEOZ is based on information provided by the Dover Air Force Base’s Air 20 Installation Compatible Use Zone Study Update. The City shall work with the Dover Air 21 Force Base to update the provisions of this section as needed. 22 (b) In case of conflicting standards and requirements, the more stringent standards and 23 requirements shall apply. Uses prohibited by the underlying zoning designations of the 24 properties within the AEOZ shall not be permitted by this section. 25 22.2 Definitions. 26 (1) (a) Air installations compatible use zones (AICUZ): is a department of defense program to 27 achieve compatibility between air installations and neighboring communities. 28 (2) (b) Airport environs: is the geographic area that is affected by airport air traffic operations and 29 defined on the basis of those areas immediately impacted by aircraft noise of the 65 decibels 30 (dBs) and greater noise exposure areas as delineated by the current and approved DAFB air 31 compatibility use zone study. This area is represented as the airport environs overlay zone 32 (AEOZ). 33 (3) (c) Day-night average A-weighted sound level (DNL): is a cumulative aircraft noise index 34 which estimates the exposure to aircraft noise and relates the estimated exposure to an expected 35 community response; a 24-hour energy average sound level expressed in decibels (dBs), with a 36 ten-decibel penalty applied to noise occurring between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. 37 (4) (d) DNL contour: is an isoline linking together a series of points of equal cumulative noise 38 exposure based on Ldn metric. Such contours are developed based on aircraft flight patterns, 39 number of daily aircraft operations by type of aircraft and time of day, noise characteristics of 40 each aircraft, and typical runway usage patterns. 41 (5) (e) Decibel (dB) : is a unit of measure of sound pressure or intensity. 42 (6) (f) Ldn metric: is the average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, 43 obtained by adding ten decibels to the hourly noise levels measured during the night (10:00 p.m. 44 to 7:00 a.m.). 45 (g) SLUCM: Standard Land Use Coding Manual, U.S. Department of Transportation. 1

46 22.3 Accident potential zones and noise zones. The AEOZ is comprised of two basic regulatory 47 components: accident potential zones and noise zones. This section establishes three accident potential 48 zones and four noise zones. The boundaries of each of these zones are delineated on the City of Dover 49 zoning map and are further described as follows: 50 (a) Accident potential zones: 51 (1) Clear zone (CZ) is that area immediately adjoining the end of a runway and which 52 extends outward from the edge of the runway a distance of 3,000 feet and which is 3,000 53 feet in width )(1,500 feet to either side of the centerline of the airport runway); 54 (2) Accident potential zone I (APZ I) is that area immediately adjoining the outer edge of 55 the CZ and which extends outward from the boundary of the CZ a distance of 5,000 feet, 56 and which is 3,000 feet in width (1,500 feet to either side of the centerline of the 57 airport runway); and 58 (3) Accident potential zone II (APZ II) is that area immediately adjoining the outer edge 59 of the APZ I and which extends outward from the boundary of the APZ I a distance of 60 7,000 feet, and which is 3,000 feet in width. 61 (b) Noise zones: 62 (1) Noise zone A (DNL A) is that area within and bounded by DNL contour lines of 63 between 65 decibels and 69 decibels of noise pressure. 64 (2) Noise zone B (DNL B) is that area within and bounded by DNL contour lines of 65 between 70 decibels and 74 decibels of noise pressure. 66 (3) Noise zone C (DNL C) is that area within and bounded by DNL contour lines of 67 between 75 decibels and 79 decibels of noise pressure. 68 (4) Noise zone D (DNL D) is that area within and bounded by DNL contour lines of 80 69 decibels and subject to noise pressure of 80 decibels and greater. 70 22.4 Exemptions. The following uses and structures are exempt from compliance with the provisions of 71 this article section: 72 (a) Additions to existing one-family dwellings. Additions to existing one-family dwellings may 73 be permitted when all other applicable zoning district bulk requirements are met. 74 (b) Additions to existing commercial non-residential buildings. Additions to existing 75 commercial buildings limited to a maximum additional floor area of 3,000 square feet for 76 buildings designed and intended for human occupancy, and unlimited floor area for 77 additions to buildings primarily used for storage, warehousing and other uses not designed 78 or intended for human occupancy as a primary use. 79 (1) Additions to existing non-residential buildings designed for human occupation 80 shall be limited to a maximum increase of 50% of the floor area. 81 (2) Additions to existing non-residential buildings designed for storage, warehousing 82 and other uses not designed or intended for human occupancy as a primary use are 83 unlimited in floor area. 84 (c) Temporary uses. Temporary uses [which] include but are not limited to public gatherings, 85 celebrations and outdoor entertainment events are permitted, so long as the period of operation 86 does not exceed five days. 87 (d) Temporary structures. Temporary buildings and structures such as tents, pavilions, bleachers, 88 etc., that are not used for residential purposes, and which meet said applicable requirements as 89 contained within this zoning ordinance [appendix] are permitted, so long as such uses and 90 associated structures are constructed incidental to a permitted use. 91 (e) Agricultural uses, operations and structures. Agricultural uses, operations, and 92 buildings and associated nonresidential structures, and lands in agricultural production. 2

93 (f e) Accessory uses and structures. Accessory uses and structures incidental to a permitted 94 principal structure or use. 95 22.5 Land use and development standards. Any building or portion thereof constructed or placed within 96 the AEOZ after the effective date of this section shall, and comply[ing] with the following standards: 97 (a) Unless specifically exempted under [sub]section 22.4 above, land uses shall be permitted or 98 prohibited in accordance with [sub]section 22.6, land use compatibility table. 99 (b) Proposed structures situated within noise zones A through D shall be constructed with noise 100 attenuation features to achieve the minimum interior noise level reductions specified by building 101 type in [sub]section 22.6, land use compatibility table. 102 (c) In APZ I and APZ II, no structure may be erected over 60 feet in height, regardless of zoning 103 district bulk regulations of the individual zoning district. 104 (d) All building permit applications for construction of new buildings or building additions not 105 exempted under section 22.4, within AEOZ shall be accompanied by a written statement from a 106 licensed architect or engineer, which lists all construction materials to be used and the resultant 107 interior noise level reductions to be achieved. The written analysis provided by the engineer or 108 architect shall demonstrate that the proposed construction will achieve compliance with the 109 minimum required interior noise level reductions specified in [sub]section 22.6, land use 110 compatibility table. 111 22.6 Land use compatibility table. 112 TABLE INSET: 113 3

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY TABLE Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) AEOZ Zones Noise Zones Accident Potential Zones Land Use A B C D CZ APZ 1 APZ II 65-69 dB 70-74 dB 75-79 dB 80 + dB Single, Two, and Multifamily Y1 Y1 Y1 Y1 N N Y5 Manufactured Housing Y1 Y1 Y1 Y1 N N N RESIDENTIAL Hotels, Motels, and Lodges Y2 Y3 N N N N N All Other Y1 Y1 N N N N N Residential Retail Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Business Services Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Personal Services Y Y2 N N N N N Professional Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Services Professional Offices Y Y2 N N N N N All Other Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Commercial Manufacturing, Warehousing, Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Distribution NONRESIDENTParking Facilities Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 IAL All Other Industrial Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Hospitals, Nursing Homes Y2 Y3 N N N N N Other Medical Y Y3 Y3 N N N Y 3,4 Facilities Educational Y2 Y3 N N N N N Facilities Houses of Worship, Public Assembly Y2 Y3 N N N N N Government Y Y3 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 Facilities Parks & Recreation Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N Y 3,4 Y 3,4 ALL OTHER USES Y Y2 Y3 Y3 N6 Y 3,4 Y 3,4 114 Y Land use permitted 115 N Land use prohibited 116 1 Interior noise level reduction of 25 db is required in subdistrict A, 30 db in subdistrict B, 35 db in 117 subdistrict C, and 40 db in subdistrict D. 4

118 2 Interior noise level reduction of 25 db is required for all areas where the public is received, office 119 areas, noise-sensitive areas, or where the normal noise level is low. 120 3 Interior noise level reduction of 30 db is required for all areas where the public is received, office 121 areas, noise-sensitive areas, or when the normal level is low. 122 4 Structures not exceeding 60 feet in height within APZ I and II. 123 5 Single-family dwellings with a gross density of no more than one unit to the acre. 124 6 Agricultural uses not prohibited by [subsection] 22.8. Land Use Compatibility Table Accident Potential Noise Zones in DNL dBA Zones SLUCM Name Clear APZ I APZ II A B C D No. Zone 65-69 70-74 75-79 80+ 10 Residential 11 Household units 11.11 Single units; detached N N Y5, 12 Y1,12 Y2 N N 11.12 Single units; semidetached and attached N N N Y1 Y2 N N 11.31 Apartments N N N Y1 Y2 N N 12 Group quarters N N N Y1 Y2 N N 13 Residential hotels N N N Y1 Y2 N N 14 Mobile home parks or courts N N N N N N N 15 Transient lodgings N N N Y1 Y2 Y5 N 16 Other residential N N N Y1 Y2 N N 20 Manufacturing Food & kindred products; 21 N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 manufacturing 22 Textile mill products; manufacturing N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Apparel and other finished products 23 made from fabrics, leather, and similar N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 materials; manufacturing Lumber and wood products (except 24 N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 furniture); manufacturing 25 Furniture and fixtures; manufacturing N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 26 Paper & allied products; manufacturing N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Printing, publishing, and allied 27 N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 industries Chemicals and allied products; 28 N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 manufacturing Petroleum refining and related 29 N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 industries 30 Manufacturing Rubber and misc. plastic products, 31 N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 manufacturing Stone, clay and glass products 32 N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 manufacturing 33 Primary metal industries N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Fabricated metal products; 34 N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 manufacturing Professional, scientific, and controlling instruments; photographic and optical 35 N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 N goods; watches and clocks manufacturing 5

39 Miscellaneous manufacturing N Y5,9 Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Transportation, Communications and 40 Utilities 41 Railroad, rapid rail transit and street N N Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 railroad transportation 42 Motor vehicle transportation N Y Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 43 Aircraft transportation N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 44 Marine craft transportation N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 45 Highway & street right-of-way N Y Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 46 Automobile parking N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 47 Communications N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 N 48 Utilities N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Other transportation communications 49 N Y10 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 N and utilities 50 Trade 51 Wholesale trade N Y5 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 52 Retail trade-building materials, N Y5 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 hardware and farm equipment 53 Retail trade-general merchandise N N Y5 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 54 Retail trade-food N N Y5 Y1 Y2 Y3 N Retail trade-automotive, marine craft, Y2 Y3 55 N Y5 Y5 Y1 N aircraft and accessories 56 Retail trade-apparel and accessories N N Y5 Y1 Y2 Y3 N Retail trade-furniture, home furnishings 57 N N Y5 Y1 Y2 Y3 N and equipment Retail trade-eating and drinking 58 N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 N establishments 59 Other retail trade N N Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 60 Services Finance, insurance and real estate 61 N N Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N services 62 Personal services N N Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 62.4 Cemeteries N N Y11 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 63 Business services N Y5,9 Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 64 Repair services N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 65 Professional services N N Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 65.1 Hospitals, nursing homes N N N Y1 Y2 N N 65.1 Other medical facilities N N N Y1 Y2 Y3 N 66 Contract construction services N Y5,9 Y Y1 Y2 Y3 N 67 Governmental services N N Y5,9 Y1 Y2 Y3 N 68 Educational services N N N Y1 Y2 N N 69 Miscellaneous services N N Y5 Y1 Y2 Y3 N Cultural, Entertainment and 70 Recreational 71 Cultural activities (including churches) N N N Y1 Y2 N N 71.2 Nature exhibits N N Y Y1 N N N 72 Public assembly N N N Y1 N N N 72.1 Auditoriums, concert halls N N N Y1 Y2 N N 72.11 Outdoor music shell, amphitheaters N N N N N N N 72.2 Outdoor sports arenas, spectator sports N N N Y6 Y6 N N 73 Amusements N N Y9 Y1 Y2 N N 6

74 Recreational activities (including golf N N Y Y Y N N courses, riding stables, water recreation) 75 Resorts and group camps N N N Y1 Y2 N N 76 Parks N Y9 Y9 Y Y N N Other cultural, entertainment and 79 N N N Y2 Y3 N N recreation 80 Resources Production and Extraction 81 Agriculture (except livestock) Y8 Y Y Y7 Y7 Y8 Y8 81.5 to Livestock farming and animal breeding N Y Y Y7 Y7 N N 81.7 82 Agricultural related activities N Y Y Y7 Y7 N N 83 Forestry activities and related services N Y Y Y7 Y7 N N 84 Fishing activities and related services N N N N N N N N Mining activities and related services N N N N N N N Other resources production and 89 N N N N N N N extraction 125 126 Y - (Yes) - Land use and related structures are compatible without restriction. 127 N - (No) - Land use and related structures are not compatible and are prohibited. 128 Yx - (yes with restrictions) - Land use and related structures generally compatible; see notes 1-12. 129 NLR - (Noise Level Reduction) - NLR (outdoor to indoor) to be achieved through incorporation of 130 noise attenuation measures into the design and construction of the structures. 131 132 NOTES 133 1. Require NLR of 25dB for DNL A. 134 2. Require NLR of 30dB for DNL B. 135 3. Require NLR of 35dB for DNL C. 136 4. Require NLR of 40dB for DNL D. 137 5. Require NLR of noise zone and building location and site planning, and design and use of berms 138 and barriers can help mitigate outdoor exposure, particularly from near ground level sources. 139 Measures that reduce outdoor noise should be used whenever practical in preference to measures 140 which only protect interior spaces. 141 6. Require NLR of noise zone and special sound reinforcement systems are installed. 142 7. Associated residential uses require NLR of noise zone. 143 8. Structures are not permitted and personnel should wear hearing protection devices. 144 9. Facilities shall be low intensity. 145 10. No Passenger terminals and no major aboveground transmission lines in APZ I. 146 11. Excludes chapels. 147 12. Maximum density of 1 dwelling unit per acre. 148 149 22.7 Design standards. 150 (a) All buildings and structures to be constructed or placed within the AEOZ shall be situated on the 151 portion of the lot that affords the least noise impact to the proposed building or structure, wherever and 152 whenever practicable. Buildings and structures shall be designed and oriented to minimize exposure to the 153 noise source and should take maximum advantage of existing physical features to minimize noise impact. 154 Windows, doors and other building openings shall be located the greatest possible distance away from the 155 noise source. 156 (b) The establishment of active recreation areas such as game fields and playgrounds shall be 157 avoided within noise zones B through D. Landscape buffer plantings and related screening material 158 shall be used whenever practicable to deflect noise away from areas intended for human habitation. 159 22.8 Prohibited uses. In addition to uses prohibited by [sub]section 22.6, land use compatibility table, the 160 following activities are prohibited within the CZ, APZ I and APZ II zones of the AEOZ, including, but 7

161 not limited to:, :storage of explosives, hazardous or toxic materials/waste; aboveground transmission 162 lines; uses that release into the air any substance which would impair visibility or otherwise interfere with 163 the operation of military aircraft (dust, smoke, etc.); uses that produce light emissions, direct or indirect, 164 which would interfere with pilot vision; and uses that attract birds or water fowl, such as, but not limited 165 to, landfills, wastewater treatment facilities, and associated settling ponds, artificial marshes, dredge spoil 166 materials, sand and gravel dredging operations and open fish farming. 167 (a) Storage of explosives; 168 (b) Hazardous or toxic materials/waste; 169 (c) Aboveground transmission lines; 170 (d) Uses that release into the air any substance which would impair visibility or otherwise interfere 171 with the operation of aircraft (dust, smoke, etc.); 172 (e) Uses that produce light emission, direct or indirect, which would interfere with pilot vision; 173 (f) And uses that attract birds or water fowl, such as, but not limited to, landfills, wastewater 174 treatment facilities, and associated settling ponds, artificial marshes, dredge spoil materials, 175 sand and gravel dredging operations and open fish farming. 176 177 SNOPSIS 178 The proposed ordinance would update the Airport Environs Overlay 179 Zone in accordance with the 2010 Air Installation Compatible Use Zone 180 study published by the Dover Air Force Base. 181 182 Actions History: 183 January 28, 2013 – First Reading by Council 184 January 14, 2013 – Introduced at the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee 185 January 28, 2013 – First Reading at City Council 186 8

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE #2013-02 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE 2 CITY OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE BOUNDARY OF THE AIRPORT ENVIRONS 3 OVERLAY ZONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2010 AICUZ STUDY PUBLISHED BY 4 THE DOVER AIR FORCE BASE. 5 6 WHEREAS, the City of Dover adopted the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) in 2001 to 7 protect the public health, safety, and welfare by identifying areas impacted by high levels of 8 aircraft noise, and the potential for aircraft accidents associated with airport operations, by 9 regulating land use and the construction of buildings within such areas; and to preserve and 10 promote the integrity of the mission of Dover Air Force Base (DAFB) as a matter of local, 11 regional and national importance, by regulating development and land use within the specific 12 areas surrounding DAFB, and to protect DAFB from encroachment of incompatible land uses; 13 and 14 15 WHEREAS, the Clear Zone, Accident Potential Zones, and Noise Zones identified as the AEOZ 16 on the Zoning Map and in Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 22 17 AEOZ are based upon information provided by the Dover Air Force Base. 18 19 WHEREAS, the Dover Air Force Base completed an Air Installation Compatibility Use Zone 20 study in 2010, which changed the noise contours in the noise zones surrounding the Dover Air 21 Force Base, and provided this updated information to the City of Dover; and 22 23 WHEREAS, the City of Dover Planning Office notified all affected property owners and held a 24 public workshop on November 8, 2012, to answer any questions that property owners might have 25 regarding the changes to the AEOZ; and 26 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY 28 OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 29 30 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map 31 and Zoning Ordinance of the City of Dover is amended by changing the Airport 32 Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) in accordance with the map presented to City 33 Council on March 11, 2013 entitled “Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) – 34 2013 Amendments.” 35 36 SYNOPSIS 37 The proposed ordinance would incorporate the changes to the Air 38 Installation Compatible Use Zone into the Zoning Map as the Airport 39 Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ). 40 41 Actions History: 42 January 28, 2013 – First Reading by Council 43 January 14, 2013 – Introduced at the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee

UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee Meeting was held on February 25, 2013 at 5:01 p.m. with Chairman Bonar presiding. Members present were Mr. Perza, Mrs. Williams (arrived at 5:24 p.m.), and Mr. Blakeman. Mr. Snaman was absent. Members of Council present were Mr. Dixon and Mr. Lynn (arrived at 5:05 p.m.), Mr. Hare (arrived at 5:14 p.m. and departed at 5:23 p.m.), Mr. Hutchison, and Council President Leary (arrived at 5:10 p.m.). Mayor Carey was also present. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS By unanimous consent, the agenda was approved as presented. Annexation Request - Property Located at 1174 South Governors Avenue, Owned by Sipple’s Used Cars, Inc. Members were provided a Petition to Annex and Zone Property located at 1174 South Governors Avenue, consisting of 8,250+/- SF, owned by Sipple’s Used Cars, Inc. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that the property is currently served by City of Dover Electric and, although there is no sanitary sewer or water service to the property, both sanitary sewer and water mains run on South Governors Avenue in front of the property. She indicated that the property owner would be responsible for the costs associated with tapping the sanitary sewer and water mains, extending services to the property, payment of impact fees, and obtaining permits associated with such improvements. Staff recommended annexation of the property and adoption of Resolution No. 2013-06 setting the annexation referendum. In response to Mr. Perza, Mrs. Traci McDowell, City Clerk, indicated that the cost of holding such a referendum would be approximately $150. Noting that a proposed Charter Amendment was scheduled for consideration by City Council in the very near future that would change the annexation procedure by eliminating the need for a referendum for single property requests, Mr. Perza questioned if action on this request should be delayed until action was taken on the Charter Amendment, which would allow for administrative approval of the annexation. Responding, Mrs. Townshend stated that the applicant had requested City sewer. She stated that if action were delayed, the City would need to extend water and sewer to the property, with the stipulation that the property would be annexed at a later date. Mrs. McDowell advised members that the Charter Amendment was scheduled to be considered by the Legislative, Finance, and Administrative Committee during their meeting scheduled later in the evening and, should it be approved by City Council, there was no guarantee that it would be approved by the State Legislature. Mr. Blakeman moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation for annexation of the property and adoption of Resolution No. 2013-06 (Attachment #1) setting the annexation referendum for property located at 1174 South Governors Avenue, owned by Sipple’s Used Cars, Inc. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Williams and unanimously carried.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 2 Dedication of Rights-of-Way and Public Infrastructure - Village of Cannon Mill - Phase I Staff submitted a request for all public infrastructure improvements related to Phase 1 of the Village of Cannon Mill to be dedicated to the City of Dover for permanent ownership and maintenance. Members were provided a list of the public improvements associated with Phase 1. The total construction value of the public improvements was $1,170,700. Members reviewed a map showing the general location and configuration of the subject rights-of-way. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that the original developer filed for bankruptcy, which resulted in work stoppage within the subdivision. The final wearing course and punch list items remained to be completed to meet the City of Dover Standards and Specifications for Public Works Construction and had been outstanding for many years. The Department was prepared to complete the work required, pending rights-of-way and public infrastructure dedication. He stated that during their meeting scheduled for later in the evening, City Council would be considering a request for a contract in the amount of $275,000 to complete the paving and concrete improvements for this subdivision. He advised members that Representative Darryl Scott and Senator Brian Bushweller had agreed to contribute $165,000 of the $275,000 in community transportation funds. Mr. Koenig explained that, in order to use these funds, the roads must be dedicated prior to the agreements being signed. Staff recommended acceptance of the dedication of rights-of-way and public infrastructure in the Village of Cannon Mill Subdivision (Phase I), with dedication to include all of the referenced public improvements, as follows: Sewer Utility Infrastructure (Construction Value = $265,100): 10” SDR-35 PVC Sanitary Sewer Main - 1,945 l.f. 8” SDR-35 PVC Sanitary Sewer Main - 2,755 l.f. 6” PVC Sanitary Sewer Laterals - 3,300 l.f. (134 laterals) 4' Diameter Sanitary Sewer Manholes - 24 ea. (214 v.f.) Water Utility Infrastructure (Construction Value = $162,000): 8” Ductile Iron (Class 52 Cement Lined) Water Main - 6,100 l.f. 6” Ductile Iron (Class 52 Cement Lined) Water Main - 255 l.f. 1” K Copper Water Service Lines - 3,600 l.f. (134 services) 8” Gate Valve - 20 ea. 6” Hydrant Valve - 9 ea. Fire Hydrants - 9 ea.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 3 Storm Water Infrastructure (Construction Value = $169,700): Catch Basins - 40 ea. 4’ Diameter Storm Sewer Manholes - 3 ea. Outfall Structure - 4 ea. 15” Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 1,610 l.f. 18” Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 905 l.f. 24” Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 735 l.f. 30” Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 465 l.f. Street Infrastructure (0.7348 miles) (Construction Value = $573,900): Cannon Mill Dr. Station 0+00 to Station 6+50 650 l.f. East Sheldrake Cir. Station 37+75 to Station 20+50 580 l.f. West Sheldrake Cir. Station 0+00 to Station 6+00 600 l.f. Paradee Dr. Station 0+00 to Station 11+00 1,100 l.f. Quillen St. Station 0+00 to Station 7+00 700 l.f. Lester Court Station 0+00 to Station 6+00 600 l.f. Mr. Koenig stated that once these improvements are completed, staff would be working with Artisans’ Bank, who had purchased a portion of the remainder of the development, to obtain a new Letter of Credit on this portion. He indicated that when those lots that are in foreclosure are sold to a new developer, the City would require a Letter of Credit for the balance of the subdivision for the Village of Cannon Mill. Responding to Mrs. Williams regarding egresses involving the new Dover High School, Mr. Koenig stated that the Village of Westover egress is no longer being considered; however, the Village of Cannon Mill remains as originally proposed. Referring to the map provided, Mr. Koenig stated that there was a right-of-way that extends to the new Dover High School property. He noted that, in planning the High School, this was projected to be a road connection; however, that connection was unfunded and the dedication being considered at this time did not include that length of roadway. Mrs. Williams questioned if the two (2) projects (the dedication and moving the right-of-way down the property of the Village of Cannon Mill) could be dovetailed. Responding, Mr. Koenig did not feel this would be necessary since the additional dedication could be submitted at a later date. With regard to the school issue, he stated that moving the project down Hazlettville Road would be an issue to be worked out with the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), Agricultural Land Preservation, and Papen Farms. It was his belief that this project would not be addressed in the next two (2) years but would be considered in the next five (5) to ten (10) years. In response to Mr. Perza, Mr. Koenig indicated that the City received correspondence stating that the original Letter of Credit from 2005 was rescinded. He advised members that Deputy City Solicitor Pepper reviewed the letter and had indicated that the City could challenge it in court since it was not sent certified; however, he stated that this was an unsecured Letter of Credit and the original developer was no longer involved with this subdivision.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 4 Mrs. Williams moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation for the acceptance of the dedication of public infrastructure for The Village of Cannon Mill - Phase I to include all of the referenced public improvements. The motion was seconded by Mr. Blakeman and carried with Mr. Perza voting no. Dedication of Rights-of-Way and Public Infrastructure - Village of Westover- Phase VI Staff submitted a request for all public infrastructure improvements related to Phase VI of the Village of Westover to be dedicated to the City of Dover for permanent ownership and maintenance. Members were provided a list of the public improvements associated with Phase 1. The total construction value of the public improvements was $1,092,501. Members were provided a map showing the general location and configuration of the subject rights-of-way. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that the original developer filed for bankruptcy, which resulted in work stoppage within the subdivision. The final wearing course and punch list items remained to be completed to meet the City of Dover Standards and Specifications for Public Works Construction and had been outstanding for many years. The Department was prepared to complete the work required, pending rights-of-way and public infrastructure dedication. Mr. Koenig indicated that the City had a Letter of Credit issued by Wilmington Trust, in the approximate amount of $265,000. He noted that Wilmington Trust had been acquired by M&T Bank and that staff believed that the Bank would take charge, hire a contractor, and finish the subdivision in order to avoid the City’s calling the Letter of Credit. However, he stated that in speaking with a representative of M&T Bank, the City was provided a choice between: 1) going through the extended process of the bank hiring a contractor on their schedule, or 2) calling the Letter of Credit. He stated that staff had drafted the call of the Letter of Credit and, once submitted with the site drafts, the bank would issue a check to the City in the amount of the Letter of Credit (approximately $264,000), which would allow completion of the top coat of paving and the installation of sidewalks. Mr. Koenig reiterated that during their meeting scheduled for later in the evening, City Council would be considering a request for a unit price paving contract and, although it was primarily associated with the Village of Cannon Mill, it could be extended for the Village of Westover, if approved by City Council. Mr. Koenig advised members that there had been several complaints from residents regarding the appearance of the property and residents felt that the City should take appropriate action. He stated that some residents had indicated a desire to sell their homes. He noted that a few buildings in the subdivision had been demolished by the City. Staff recommended acceptance of the dedication of rights-of-way and public infrastructure in the Village of Westover Subdivision -Phase VI, with dedication to include all of the referenced public improvements, as follows:

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 5 Sewer Utility Infrastructure (Construction Value = $184,461): 8” SDR-35 PVC Sanitary Sewer Main - 2,150 l.f. 6” PVC Sanitary Sewer Laterals - 2,206 l.f. (69 laterals) 4’ Diameter Sanitary sewer Manholes - 10 ea. Water Utility Infrastructure (Construction Value = $167,820): 8” Ductile Iron (Class 52 Cement Lined) Water Main - 2,600 l.f. 8” Gate valves - 5 ea 1” K Copper Water Services - 2,182 l.f. (69 services) Fire Hydrants - 3 ea. 1” K Copper Water Services - 2,182 l.f. (69 services) Storm Water Infrastructure (Construction Value = $323,296): Catch Basins Type J - 9 ea. Catch Basins Type JJ - 6 ea. Del Dot J Box - 3 ea. PW-BD-2 Mod 2 / Mod 1 - 3 ea. Type-B-2 - 3 ea. 15” Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 596 l.f. 18” Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 76 l.f. 24” Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 46 l.f. 27” Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 380 l.f. 19x30” Eliptical Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 19 l.f. 15” HDPE Pipe - 464 l.f. 18” HDPE Pipe - 813 l.f. 24” HDPE Pipe - 529 l.f. 30” HDPE Pipe - 105 l.f. Street Infrastructure (0.4256 miles) (Construction Value = $416,924): Northdown Drive Station20+00 to Station 40+00 2,000 l.f. Margate Circle Station0+18 to Station 2+65 247 l.f. Mr. Perza relayed concern that banks would not take issuing a Letter of Credit seriously if the City does not call them. Responding, Mr. Koenig indicated that the Letter of Credit for the Village of Cannon Mill was issued by the First National Bank of Wyoming and it included a clause that would allow them to cancel the Letter without approval of the City. He assured members that since then, the format used in the Letter of Credit issued by Wilmington Trust has been used as the standard. Mr. Blakeman moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation for the acceptance of the dedication of public infrastructure for The Village of Westover - Phase VI to include all of the referenced public improvements. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Williams and unanimously carried.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 6 Update - Calpine Mr. Bonar relayed his appreciation to staff for their untiring efforts and work associated with the Calpine project. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that staff had been holding weekly conference calls, as well as weekly face-to-face meetings, with Calpine. He stated that the Calpine Corporation was prepared to begin work on the temporary road as early as March 1, 2013. They continue to push their Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) contractor, Kvaerner, Inc., to begin construction on April 1, 2013 to take possession of the site. Mr. Koenig stated that staff was currently working on the extension of the water line from the Wild Meadows Subdivision to the back of the LS Power property. It was anticipated that the pipe would be delivered on February 26, 2013 to begin the extension in a southerly direction to a point where water had been requested on the Calpine property. Staff was also working on consulting contracts for the water tower and the sanitary sewer pumping station, which would serve the entire Garrison Tract. Concurrently, staff, along with the Becker Morgan Group, was completing the subdivision plans to lay out and eventually construct the balance of the infrastructure associated with the roads and storm sewer for the entire Garrison Oak Technical Park. Mr. Koenig announced that the Calpine Corporation was expected to apply for a building permit for construction to begin soon after April 1, 2013. Staff was attempting to provide an advance construction authorization (phasing of construction) so that all of the outside agency approvals would be lined up when the building permit was issued for the Calpine project. It was anticipated that Calpine, through Kvaerner, Inc., would mobilize the site and begin earth moving on Lot 7 on April 1, 2013. Mr. Koenig stated that Calpine continued to work on the alignment of the feeders that would come from the Energy Center and tie back to the City’s 230kV tie. In regard to the LS Power complaints of the plume coming off the energy center in the future and dust during construction, he stated that it was anticipated that these issues would be resolved within the next few days. He noted that additional review of Calpine’s air permit application had been requested by an adjacent property owner. This will be conducted by the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) Environmental Appeals Board. Mr. Koenig felt confident that the project would be well underway very soon. Responding to Mrs. Williams, Mr. Koenig stated that there was a maximum daily demand (running 24/7) for Block 1 in the amount of 2.3M gallons of water and the water tower would hold 1.5M gallons of water. He indicated that the City would try to constantly feed water into that water tower. Mr. Bonar advised members that staff was emphatic on ensuring that the fire protection system and water pressure in the City would be adequately protected.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 7 By unanimous consent, the meeting adjourned at 5:31 P.M. David L. Bonar Chairman DLB/tm/jg S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS\Committee-Minutes\2013\02-25-2013 UTILITY.wpd Attachment Attachment #1 - Resolution #2013-06 - Setting Annexation Referendum for Property Located at 1174 South Governors Avenue, owned by Sipple's Used Cars, Inc

ATTACHMENT #1 Utility Committee Meeting of 02/25/2013 City of Dover MAYOR AND COUNCIL 1 DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013-06 2 A RESOLUTION PROPOSING THE INCLUSION OF AN AREA WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE CITY 3 OF DOVER AND CALLING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE SAID AREA. 4 WHEREAS, the Charter of the City of Dover authorizes Council to extend the boundaries of the said City 5 after a special election of the qualified voters and real estate owners of the territory proposed to be annexed, 6 and 7 WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the City of Dover deem it in the best interest of the City of Dover 8 to include an area located at 1174 South Governors Avenue, which is contiguous to the present City limits, 9 into the limits of the City of Dover and within a zoning classification as recommended by the City of Dover 10 Planning Commission. 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, 12 IN COUNCIL MET: 13 1. That a special election be held for an area located at 1174 South Governors Avenue situated in East 14 Dover Hundred, Kent County, State of Delaware. 15 2. That the election be held on the 11th day of April, 2013 commencing at the hour of 11:00 a.m. in the 16 City Hall Annex, 15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, Delaware, for the purpose of submitting the question 17 of annexation of the above area to those persons entitled to vote thereon. 18 3. That the election be held and conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Charter of the City of 19 Dover as amended. 20 4. That this resolution be published in accordance with the City of Dover Charter. 21 ADOPTED: * 22 S:\ANNEXATIONS\Annex-2013\1174 S Governors Ave\Referendum Resolution No 2013-06.wpd 23 24 CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. THOMAS J. LEARY 25 MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT 26 Actions History: 27 February 25, 2013 - Introduced at Utility Committee P.O. Box 475 ˜ Dover, Delaware ˜19903 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting was held on February 25, 2013, at 5:33 p.m. with Chairman Lynn presiding. Members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Rushe. Mr. Shevock was absent. Members of Council present were Council President Leary, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Perza, Mr. Bonar, Mrs. Williams, and Mr. Hutchison (departed at 5:58 p.m. and returned at 6:13 p.m.). Mayor Carey was also present. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Rushe moved for approval of the agenda as presented, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Proposed Charter Amendment - Article II - Mayor and Council, Section 13 - Vacancies; Forfeiture of Office; Filling of Vacancies (Deferred by Committee on February 11, 2013 Due to Time Constraints) At the request of Councilman Anderson, staff prepared a draft amendment to Article II - Mayor and Council, Section 13 - Vacancies; Forfeiture of Office; Filling of Vacancies of the City of Dover Charter. This amendment would add a provision for elected officials to designate temporary successors in the event that they are absent or unable, for physical, mental or legal reasons, to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of the office for an extended period of time. In addition, the amendment would change the provisions regarding the filling of vacancies for the Mayor and Council seats to specify that offices vacated within six (6) months of the next election would remain vacant until the next election; however, those offices vacated for more than six (6) months from the next election would be filled through a Special Election. Members were reminded that Charter Amendments require adoption of a Resolution requesting the General Assembly to approve the amendments. Upon adoption of the Resolution, staff will forward it to local legislators for consideration. Staff recommended approval of the proposed amendments to the City of Dover Charter and adoption of the subsequent Resolution requesting the General Assembly to amend the City Charter. Mr. Anderson noted that if an executive position has a temporary vacancy, there is a mechanism to fill that vacancy. He did not believe that legislative positions were less important and advised members that many towns across the nation have worked to find ways to get around some of the political difficulties in filling such positions. He stated that the City Clerk conducted research at his request and that consideration was given to previous comments made by members of City Council related to this topic in the development of the proposed amendment, which was modeled after legislation in other states, particularly Alabama. Mr. Anderson reminded members that the need for such a mechanism had increased substantially since the terms of office were expanded to four (4) years. Mr. Hutchison noted that each Council District had two (2) representatives and that the At-Large Council Member and the Mayor also serve residents; therefore, each District would still have three (3) elected representatives in the event of the absence of one (1) member. Responding, Mr. Anderson felt that the citizens of Dover would be better served if there was a greater likelihood of having a full Council.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 2 Council President Leary did not recall any problems with obtaining a quorum or other issues as a result of members of Council being unable to attend meetings. It was his feeling that the proposal was an attempt to solve a problem that did not exist. Mr. Perza explained that the integrity of the process being discussed was important. Noting that members of Council are chosen by City residents, he felt that nominating temporary placeholders would take away some of the integrity. He advised members that if he were in a situation that would impact those who elected him to serve by causing him to step away for an extended period of time he would resign, and he felt that it would be incumbent on the person holding office to consider resignation. Although the reasons for proposing the amendment were to cover military and other legitimate absences, he cautioned members of potential abuse by members of Council who may not want to vote on a particular issue and choose to take a lengthy vacation. Concurring with Mr. Lynn, Mr. Hare suggested that members consider the proposed amendment if it were felt that such a vacancy would be detrimental to conducting City Council business. Mr. Bonar expressed his opinion that the intent of the request for a Charter change was well founded; however, in listening to the comments relayed by members, he felt that the rationale for placing trust in the body of City Council as currently structured seemed sound. He concurred with Mr. Hutchison’s comments, stating that although members of Council are elected by district, they serve the entire City and would assist any district affected by a member of Council who was absent for any reason. In response to concerns of possible abuse, Mr. Anderson noted that the proposed amendment was specifically for members who are absent due to physical, mental, or legal reasons. Responding to Mr. Lynn, Mr. Anderson stated that the proposed amendment had not been reviewed by the City Solicitor’s Office. Responding to Mr. Lynn’s suggestion to table the matter to allow for review by the City Solicitor, Mr. Perza stated his objections, explaining that he had not heard enough support to justify the legal expense. If there were no consensus to move forward, he felt that there was no need to spend additional resources studying the issue. Mr. Hare moved for the issue to be presented to City Council for their consideration without a recommendation from the Committee, seconded by Mr. Anderson and carried with Mr. Lynn voting no. Proposed Charter Amendment - Article II - Mayor and Council, Section 5 - Council to Be Legislative Body; size; Districts; Terms of Mayor and Councilmen; Qualifications (Deferred by Committee on February 11, 2013 Due to Time Constraints) Mrs. Traci McDowell, City Clerk, advised members that it was recently brought to staff’s attention that the current wording of Article II - Mayor and Council, Section 5 - Council to be Legislative Body; Size; Districts; Terms of Mayor and Councilmen; Qualifications, indicates that in order to be eligible to be elected as mayor or as a member of council, the person must, as of the date of the

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 3 election, be: (4) Eighteen years of age. This amendment would correct that language to be “Eighteen years of age or older.” She also noted that additional amendments were proposed to make the language in this section more concise. Members were reminded that Charter Amendments require adoption of a Resolution requesting the General Assembly to approve the amendments. Upon adoption of the Resolution, staff would forward it to local legislators for submission. Staff recommended approval of the proposed amendments to the City of Dover Charter and adoption of the subsequent Resolution requesting the General Assembly to amend the City Charter. Mr. Anderson moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation and adoption of the Resolution requesting the General Assembly to approve the Charter Amendments. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. Proposed Charter Amendment - Article I - Powers of the City, Section 1.05 - Procedure to Extend Boundaries (Deferred by Committee on February 11, 2013 Due to Time Constraints) Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that the Planning Office and City Clerk's Office began working on a Charter Amendment regarding annexation several years ago when the City was receiving a lot of interest in annexation. She stated that the Charter currently requires that all petitions for annexation be subject to an election of the owners and residents of the property proposed for annexation. In reviewing many annexation requests, it became apparent that the added step of an election in cases where the only person(s) voting were those who requested annexation was an inefficient use of City staff and financial resources, as well as an added burden to the property owner(s). She stated that a Charter amendment was required to eliminate this unnecessary step. Mrs. Townshend explained that the proposed Charter amendment developed by staff would eliminate the requirement for an election when the property owner had requested annexation of their property. However, the proposal would require an election in the cases where the entirety of the area proposed for annexation was not the subject of a request from the property owners. As proposed, she assured members that the City would not be able to annex land against the owner's wishes without the opportunity for the owner to vote in an election. She stated that the proposed Charter amendment would simplify the annexation process and reduce unnecessary costs but still allow property owners a vote if their property were the subject of an annexation proposal that was not petitioned by the owners. Members were reminded that Charter Amendments require adoption of a Resolution requesting the General Assembly to approve the amendments. Upon adoption of the Resolution, staff would forward it to local legislators for submission. Staff recommended approval of the proposed amendments to the City of Dover Charter and adoption of the subsequent Resolution requesting the General Assembly to amend the City Charter.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 4 Mr. Hare moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation and adoption of the Resolution requesting the General Assembly to approve the Charter Amendments. The motion was seconded by Mr. Rushe and unanimously carried. Disposal of Excess Property - Justice of the Peace (JP) Court 7 and 16 Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that the City received a request from Cabe Associates, Inc. and Delaware Architects, LLC on behalf of the State of Delaware, Administrative Office of the Court, to potentially expand the existing Justice of the Peace (JP) Court 7 and 16 building located at the intersection of Bank Lane and West Street immediately adjacent to the Dover Police Department. The proposed court expansion is desired in order to meet the area’s growing needs for court facilities. At this time, only the JP Court 7 and 16 building footprint is owned by the State of Delaware. In order for the court to expand, the City of Dover must agree to dispose of any surrounding land required to accommodate the proposed expansion. Mr. Koenig explained that since the engineers and architects were in the early planning stages, exact land requirements were unknown at this time; therefore, he envisioned the request to be a two (2) step process. The first step would be to receive approval from City Council for the City Manager to become a co-applicant, along with the State of Delaware, on a site plan application for the proposed expansion. He stated that the site plan and facilities planning process would identify the exact amount of land that would be needed by the court to expand. Once the exact amount of land was known, the City Manager would fully initiate the Procedures for Sale and Disposal of Real Property and return to the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee with a specific recommendation regarding the transfer of any land necessary to accommodate the proposed expansion of the court. Mr. Koenig assured members that staff would work closely with the project engineer, project architect, representatives from the State of Delaware, and the Dover Police Department to design a project that would meet the needs of the Court while addressing any operational concerns of the Dover Police Department, since they are the adjoining property owner. Staff recommended that the City Manager be authorized to become a co-applicant, along with the State of Delaware, on a site plan application to expand JP Court 7 and 16 located at the intersection of Bank Lane and West Street. Once the amount of land necessary to accommodate the proposed expansion is known, the City Manager would return to the Committee with a recommendation regarding the disposal of City property necessary to accommodate the proposed expansion. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Koenig confirmed that the State of Delaware would be bearing all costs associated with this matter. Mr. Hutchison questioned if staff had considered the open space adjacent to the Police Station on the southwest corner. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that there had not been any recent discussions; however, he felt that the JP Court 7 and 16 expansion may reignite that interest. Mr. Hutchison advised members that approximately 50 people work in JP Court 7 and 16 and noted the convenience

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2013 PAGE 5 of the Court’s location for police officers due to its close proximity to the Police Station. He urged members to support the request and approve staff’s recommendation. Due to his wife’s employment at the Court, he advised members that he would not be voting on this issue. Mr. Hare moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation authorizing the City Manager to become a co-applicant, along with the State of Delaware, on a site plan application to expand JP Court 7 and 16 located at the intersection of Bank Lane and West Street; once the amount of land necessary to accommodate the proposed expansion is known, the City Manager will return to the Committee with a recommendation regarding the disposal of City property necessary to accommodate the proposed expansion. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. By unanimous consent, the meeting adjourned at 6:16 P.M. Sean M. Lynn Chairman SML/tm/jg/js/mk S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS\Committee-Minutes\2013\02-25-2013 LF&A.wpd

City of Dover MAYOR AND COUNCIL 1 DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013-08 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 3 That the Mayor and Council have determined that the Charter of the City of Dover should be amended to 4 provide for the appointment of temporary successors to elected officials in the event of an extended absence. 5 Therefore, the Mayor and Council of the City of Dover respectfully request the General Assembly of the 6 State of Delaware to amend Article II - Mayor and Council, Section 13. - Vacancies; forfeiture of office; 7 filling of vacancies, of its Charter, which amendments, if adopted by the General Assembly, would be as 8 follows: 9 CITY OF DOVER CHARTER - ARTICLE II - MAYOR AND COUNCIL 10 Section 13. - Temporary successors; Vacancies; forfeiture of office; filling of vacancies 11 (a) Temporary successors. Within 30 days of entering upon the duties of their office, each elected 12 official shall designate by name and order of succession no less than three nor more than seven 13 temporary successors to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of their office, but not hold 14 the office, in the event that the elected official is absent from the city or unable, for physical, 15 mental, or legal reason, to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of their office. 16 (1) Qualifications of temporary successors. No person shall be designated to serve, nor serve, 17 as a temporary successor unless such person is legally qualified under the charter and the 18 code of ordinances of the City of Dover to hold the office of the person whose powers and 19 duties they are designated to succeed. 20 (2) Assumption of powers and duties by temporary successor. Temporary successors shall 21 take the same oath of office as prescribed for the elected official upon assuming the 22 powers and duties of the office. 23 (3) Term of temporary successors. The temporary successor designation is assigned and 24 revoked at the pleasure of the elected official. 25 (4) Periodic review of temporary successor designations. It shall be incumbent upon each 26 elected official to review and revise as necessary their temporary successor designees to 27 ensure that at all times there are at least three duly authorized temporary successors for 28 each elected official of the City. P.O. Box 475 ˜ Dover, Delaware ˜19903 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

Draft Proposed Resolution No. 2013-08 - Temporary Successor/Filling of Vacancy Page 2 29 (5) Recording and publication of successors. The name, address, and rank in order of 30 succession of each temporary successor designee shall be filed with the city clerk. Any 31 changes to the elected official’s designations shall become effective when the elected 32 official files those changes with the city clerk. The city clerk shall maintain a current list 33 of the names and order of succession of each designee for temporary successors and it 34 shall be open to public inspection. 35 (6) Compensation. Temporary successors shall serve without salary. They shall, however, be 36 entitled to reimbursement for actual expenses necessarily incurred in the performance of 37 their powers and duties. 38 (a)(b) Vacancies. The office of a council member shall become vacant upon the member's death, 39 resignation, or removal from office or forfeiture of office in any manner authorized by law. 40 (b)(c) Forfeiture of office. A council member shall forfeit that office if the council member: 41 (1) Fails to meet the residency requirements, 42 (2) Violates any express prohibition of this charter, 43 (3) Is convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, or 44 (4) Fails to attend three consecutive regular meetings of the council without being excused by 45 the council. 46 In the case of any such vacancy or of any vacancy created by death, resignation or otherwise for which said 47 vacancy shall be less than six months from the next election in duration, the office shall remain vacant. 48 If such vacancy should be in excess of six months from the next election in duration, a Special Election 49 shall be held to fill such vacancy, this Special Election to be held no sooner than 30 days from the date of 50 the vacancy, but said sSpecial eElection to be held no later than 60 days after the date of the vacancy. If 51 council fails to call for a Special Election, the Special Election shall be called by the Election Board. 52 ADOPTED: * 53 S:\RESOLUTIONS-PROCLAMATIONS-TRIBUTES\2013\Draft\2013-08 Request to GA- Temporary Successor-Filling of Vacancy w Markup.wpd 54 55 CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. THOMAS J. LEARY 56 MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT 57 SYNOPSIS 58 This amendment provides for the appointment of temporary successors to 59 elected officials in the event of an extended absence. 60 Actions History: 61 March 11, 2013 - Considered by City Council

City of Dover MAYOR AND COUNCIL DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013-09 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 2 That the Mayor and Council have determined that the Charter of the City of Dover should be amended to 3 correct the wording for the age requirement to run for office and to improve readability. Therefore, the 4 Mayor and Council of the City of Dover respectfully request the General Assembly of the State of Delaware 5 to amend Article II - Mayor and Council, Section 5. - Council to be legislative body; size; districts; terms 6 of mayor and councilmen; qualifications, of its Charter, which amendments, if adopted by the General 7 Assembly, would be as follows: 8 CITY OF DOVER CHARTER - ARTICLE II - MAYOR AND COUNCIL 9 Sec. 5. - Council to be legislative body; size; districts; terms of mayor and councilmen; qualifications. 10 The council shall be the legislative body of the city and composed of nine members nominated and elected 11 as herein provided. 12 In order that the members of council shall be distributed over the city, the The city shall be divided into 13 four election districts, the district boundaries of which shall he be established by council so that the 14 districts they are nearly equal in population as shown by the most recent federal decennial census based 15 on the latest federal decennial census information. The district boundaries established for municipal 16 elections shall be used for the next regular municipal election and shall continue in effect until the next 17 succeeding federal decennial census is made available for use by municipalities in the State of Delaware. 18 , at which time council shall redistrict the city so that the districts shall be nearly equal in population 19 in accordance with said census, which redistricting shall be used for the next regular municipal 20 election, which procedure shall be followed by council after each succeeding federal decennial census 21 in this manner so that the districts shall be maintained as nearly equal in population as possible at all 22 times. 23 At the regular municipal election held in April of 2012, the mayor shall be elected at-large. The term of 24 mayor elected at the April 2012 regular municipal election shall be for a period of three years, commencing 25 on the second Monday in May following his/her election and continuing for a term of three years until the 26 second Monday in May 2015, or until his/her successor has been duly elected and qualified. 27 Thereafter, commencing with the regular municipal election to be held in April of 2015, the term of mayor 28 shall be for a period of four years commencing on the second Monday in May following his/her election and 29 continuing for a term of four years until the second Monday in May, or until his/her successor has been duly 30 elected and qualified. 31 At the regular municipal election held in April of 2012, four councilmen shall be elected by district voting 32 from each of the districts of the city. The term of the councilmen elected at the April 2012 regular municipal 33 election shall be for three years, commencing on the second Monday in May following their election and 34 continuing for a term of three years until the second Monday in May 2015, or until their successors have 35 been duly elected and qualified.

DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013-09 PAGE 2 36 At the regular municipal election held in April of 2013, five councilmen shall be elected, four by district 37 voting being from the districts and one at-large. The term of the councilmen elected at the April 2013 regular 38 municipal election shall be for a period of four years, commencing on the second Monday in May following 39 their election and continuing for a period of four years until the second Monday in May, or until their 40 successors have been duly elected and qualified. 41 Thereafter, commencing with the regular municipal election to be held in April of 2013, the terms of the 42 councilmen shall be for a period of four years, commencing on the second Monday in May following their 43 election and continuing for a term of four years until the second Monday in May, or until their successors 44 have been duly elected and qualified. The mayor and at-large councilman shall be elected at alternating 45 biennial regular municipal elections. 46 In order to be eligible to be elected as mayor or as a member of council, the person must as of the date of 47 the election be: 48 (1) A citizen of the United States and of the State of Delaware; 49 (2) A resident of the city and having continuously resided therein or in an area annexed to the 50 city during the two years next immediately preceding the day of the election; 51 (3) A resident of the election district from which they are seeking election, unless they are 52 seeking election as an at-large councilman or mayor; 53 (4) Eighteen years of age or older; and 54 (5) Nominated therefore, as hereinafter provided. 55 Holding Other Office. Except where authorized by law, no council members shall hold any other elected 56 public office, city office, or city employment during the term for which the member was elected to the 57 council. No council member shall hold any other city office or employment during the term for which 58 the member was elected to the council. No former council members shall hold any compensated 59 appointive office or employment with the city until one year after the expiration of the term for which the 60 member was elected to the council, unless granted a waiver by the Board of Ethics (Ethics Commission). 61 (Amd. of 7-12-2005 (S.B. 126); Amd. of 7-8-2009 (S.B. 165, § 6); Ord. No. 2010-23, 8-23-2010 (S.B. 8); 62 Res. No. 2011-11, 10-10-2011, (S.B. 165)) 63 ADOPTED: * 64 S:\RESOLUTIONS-PROCLAMATIONS-TRIBUTES\2013\Draft\2013-09 Request to GA- Correction to Age Requirement w Markup.wpd 65 66 CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. THOMAS J. LEARY 67 MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT 68 Actions History: 69 March 11, 2013 - Introduced at City Council

City of Dover MAYOR AND COUNCIL 1 DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013-10 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 3 That the Mayor and Council have determined that the Charter of the City of Dover should be amended to 4 remove the requirement for an annexation referendum election when the annexation is the result of a request 5 from the property owner(s). Therefore, the Mayor and Council of the City of Dover respectfully request the 6 General Assembly of the State of Delaware to amend Article I - Powers of the City, Section 1.05 Procedure 7 to extend boundaries, of its Charter, which amendments, if adopted by the General Assembly, would be as 8 follows: 9 CITY OF DOVER CHARTER - ARTICLE I - POWERS OF THE CITY 10 Sec. 1.05. - Procedure to extend boundaries. 11 The City may, from time to time, extend its boundaries in accordance with Title 22, Chapter 1, 12 Section 101 (22 Del. C. § 101) through the following annexation processes: 13 (1) In the case where annexation is petitioned by all owners of all property considered for 14 annexation, no election shall be required. 15 For an annexation petition not requiring an election, such petition shall be processed in 16 accordance with procedures established for amendments to the zoning map, specified in Dover 17 Code, Appendix B - Zoning. All annexation petitions shall be processed concurrently with the 18 rezoning of the property considered for annexation and shall be subject to public hearing before 19 City Council. Public notice shall be completed in accordance with the provisions of the Dover 20 Code relating to amendment of the zoning map. 21 (2) In the case where annexation is not petitioned by all owners of all property considered for 22 annexation, such annexation shall be subject to an election, as follows: 23 (a) In order to extend the boundaries of the City of Dover the council shall adopt a resolution 24 proposing the inclusion of territory or territories all property considered for annexation 25 within the limits of the City of Dover and calling for a special election to be held not less 26 than 30 nor more than 60 days after the adoption of the resolution, in said territory or 27 territories in accordance with Title 22, Chapter 1, Section 101, Delaware Code (22 Del. C. 28 § 101) insofar as applicable. P.O. Box 475 ˜ Dover, Delaware ˜19903 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013-10 PAGE 2 29 SaidThe resolution shall contain a description of the territory or territories proposed to 30 be annexed all property considered for annexation, and shall specify the date of such the 31 election, which shall be not less than 30 nor more than 60 days after the adoption of 32 said resolution, and the place or places of said election. Said The resolution shall be 33 published in at least two issues of a newspaper of general circulation within the City of 34 Dover at least two weeks prior to the day of said election. 35 Elections may be held in more than one of said territories on the same day, but the said 36 elections shall be separate; only the votes of qualified voters of a territory as herein 37 described shall be counted in the election to determine whether the territory shall be 38 annexed. 39 (b) Any such The annexation election shall be held by the city’s election officers. of the 40 election district or districts of Kent County which shall include the territory proposed 41 to be annexed. Every person 18 years of age or upwards who is duly registered upon 42 the books of registered voters for said election district, or districts, who is a resident of 43 the territory proposed to be included within the limits of the City of Dover, and who 44 does not own real estate within said territory shall be entitled to one vote at the election 45 to determine whether said territory shall be annexed; and every person who is the 46 owner of real estate within a territory proposed to be included assessed to them on the 47 assessment records of Kent County, Each owner of the property considered for 48 annexation shall be entitled to one vote. Owners of real estate in common shall be entitled 49 to one vote each. Life tenants shall be entitled to one vote each, but the holders of the 50 remainder interest or similar interest subject to the life estate shall not be entitled to vote. 51 Corporations, firms or associations shall be entitled to one vote, the same as private persons. 52 More than one annexation election may be held on the same day; however, the elections 53 shall be separate. 54 The Council of the City of Dover shall provide the ballots for any such election and shall 55 bear the cost of holding such annexation elections. The ballots shall briefly indicate the 56 territory property proposed to be included for annexation and shall provide two boxes on 57 the ballot beside which shall appear the words "FOR inclusion within the City of Dover," and 58 "AGAINST inclusion within the City of Dover." Each voter shall indicate their preference 59 by making a mark within the box beside the words expressing their preference. 60 At any such election For the annexation election, the polls shall he open from at 11:00 61 a.m. to and remain open until each eligible voter has cast their vote or until 8:00 p.m., 62 whichever occurs first. When the polls are closed the election officers shall publicly count 63 the votes and forthwith certify to the clerk of the council the number of votes cast for and 64 against inclusion within the city limits. At the next regular or special meeting of the council, 65 the mayor and council shall receive the results of the election and make the same a part of 66 the minutes of said meeting.

DRAFT PROPOSED COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013-10 PAGE 3 67 If a majority of the votes cast in an annexation election held in a territory proposed to be 68 annexed shall be in favor of the inclusion of that territory property, the council may 69 thereupon adopt a resolution annexing said territory property and including same within the 70 limits of the City of Dover. Upon the adoption of a resolution of annexation, a copy thereof 71 certified by the clerk of council and a map of the area annexed shall be forthwith filed for 72 record with the Recorder of Deeds of Kent County, and the area so annexed shall for all 73 purposes thenceforth be part of the City of Dover. 74 If a majority of the votes cast in an annexation election held in a territory proposed to be 75 annexed shall be against the inclusion of that territory property within the limits of the City 76 of Dover, the proposed annexation of said territory property shall be declared to have failed. 77 Nothing in this Charter shall prohibit the council from resubmitting a proposal of for 78 annexation to the eligible voters of for said territory property, or any portion thereof, under 79 the authority of this section and in accordance with the provisions thereof. 80 (Amd. of 7-8-2009 (S.B. 165, § 2)) 81 ADOPTED: * 82 S:\RESOLUTIONS-PROCLAMATIONS-TRIBUTES\2013\Draft\2013-10 Request to GA- Annexation w Markup.wpd 83 84 CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. THOMAS J. LEARY 85 MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT 86 Actions History: 87 March 11, 2013 - Introduced at City Council

CITY OF DOVER FINANCE & CENTRAL SERVICES DEPARTMENTS MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT JANUARY 2013 PREPARED BY: FINANCE DEPARTMENT PLEASE NOTE – THIS REPORT PROVIDES TOP LINE INFORMATION ON THE OPERATING FUNDS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT.

2 of 9 CITY OF DOVER January 2013 Monthly Budget Reports S FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY LEVELS FY12 YTD FY13 YTD BANK TRENDS Number of Deposits Made (Hand, ACH & Wire Lockbox FY13) 2,973 3,168 Total Amount of All Deposits $ 93,489,779 $ 88,963,328 PAYROLL Hours % Amount Hours % Amount Gross wages per registers 556,671 100.0% $ 13,114,572 496,867 100.0% $ 11,908,812 Wages and Hours Worked Regular 461,558 82.9% $ 10,050,589 413,230 83.2% $ 9,179,059 All over time 21,149 3.8% $ 954,745 24,669 5.0% $ 1,087,259 Other Paid or Unpaid Wages and Hours Vacation 43,328 7.8% $ 1,153,017 29,316 5.9% $ 759,746 Sick 14,394 2.6% $ 359,805 12,042 2.4% $ 302,513 Terminal Leave - Retiree Vacation/Sick Payout 7,702 1.4% $ 262,642 10,631 2.1% $ 299,542 Comp Time 6,196 1.1% $ 181,700 5,220 1.1% $ 147,446 Personal 791 0.1% $ 20,959 779 0.2% $ 21,687 Leave Without Pay - 0.0% $ - - 0.0% $ - Other (description below) 1,554 0.3% $ 131,116 982 0.2% $ 111,561 Other includes: pay adjustments, military differential pay, committee meetings, worker compensation tracking/adjustments, etc. Other Activity Number of Pay Periods 16 15 Number of Payroll Checks & Direct Deposits Issued 6,156 5,452 Number of Pension Checks Issued 1,673 1,726 Total Pension Benefits Paid - Defined Benefit Plan $ 2,716,295 $ 2,851,716 Payroll Checks & Direct Deposits issued: number of payroll checks issued for FY 2010 includes separate checks for shoe allowance & clothing allowance. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Number of Check Vouchers 3,498 3,679 Number of EFT Vouchers 1,257 1,210 Vouchers Dollar Amount Disbursed $ 53,315,202 $ 51,505,548 CENTRAL SERVICES ACTIVITY LEVELS Contingency & Warehouse Stock $620 Total Amount of Items on Hand $2,600,000 2400 $520 $2,500,000 2200 Total Dollar Value $2,400,000 Total Line Items $420 2000 Thousands $2,300,000 1800 $320 $2,200,000 1600 $220 $2,100,000 1400 $120 $2,000,000 1200 $20 Jan‐12 Feb‐12 Mar‐12 Apr‐12 May‐12 Jun‐12 Jul‐12 Aug‐12 Sep‐12 Oct‐12 Nov‐12 Dec‐12 Jan‐13 Electric Water General Total Dollar Value Total Line Items Electric: $531,573 Water: $57,868 General: $35,611 Value: $2,361,571 Line Items: 1,460 S t o c k P urc ha s e s by F und $ 3 5 0 ,0 0 0 Fuel Use $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 Unleaded: 10,605.6 gallons $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 Diesel: 6,152.5 gallons $ 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 Total: $ 50,282 $ 15 0 ,0 0 0 $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $0 Jan F eb M a r A pr M a y J un J ul A ug S e p O c t N o v D e c Jan 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 E le c t ric Wa t e r G e ne ra l Electric: $315,288 Water: $2,569 General: $9,406

3 of 9 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report –January 2013 General Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - unaudited $ 2,666,600 $ 2,734,400 $ - $ 2,734,400 0.0% Revenues Court of Chancery Fees 753,800 753,800 346,300 407,500 45.9% Fines & Police Revenues 1,162,400 1,162,400 690,873 471,527 59.4% Franchise Fees 550,000 550,000 248,688 301,312 45.2% Grants 708,500 708,500 363,055 345,445 51.2% Intrafund Services 4,329,100 4,329,100 2,322,230 2,006,870 53.6% Library & Recreation Revenues 602,100 602,100 282,787 319,313 47.0% Licenses & Permits 2,508,300 2,508,300 2,131,914 376,386 85.0% Property Taxes (Includes BID Revenue) (1) 11,049,000 11,115,000 11,078,301 36,699 99.7% Sanitation Revenues 2,690,200 2,690,200 1,532,828 1,157,372 57.0% Other Miscellaneous Revenues 130,500 130,500 100,889 29,611 77.3% Garrison Farm Rent Revenue 62,000 62,000 88,338 (26,338) 142.5% Civil Traffic Penalties 750,000 750,000 118,991 631,009 15.9% Municipal Street Aid Fund 527,400 527,400 265,434 261,966 50.3% Transfer Taxes 1,370,000 1,370,000 279,646 1,090,354 20.4% Verizon and CI Reserves 11,000 11,000 - 11,000 0.0% Water/Wastewater Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 - 100.0% Electric Fund 8,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 2,000,000 75.0% Total Revenues 35,704,300 35,770,300 26,350,274 9,420,026 73.7% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 38,370,900 $ 38,504,700 $ 26,350,274 $ 12,154,426 68.4% Expenditures City Clerk & Council $ 441,100 $ 441,100 $ 234,084 $ 207,016 53.1% Mayor, City Manager & Human Resources 822,100 822,100 465,983 356,117 56.7% Police & Police Extra Duty 13,774,600 13,774,600 8,081,204 5,693,396 58.7% Public Services 4,359,300 4,406,850 2,303,049 2,103,801 52.3% Central Services 1,968,400 1,978,350 1,048,203 930,147 53.0% Planning & Inspections 1,996,600 2,014,500 1,066,439 948,061 52.9% Finance, Info Tech & Customer Services 2,423,400 2,423,400 1,347,354 1,076,046 55.6% Library & Recreation 1,963,600 1,976,600 1,003,471 973,129 50.8% Fire Department 688,300 688,300 424,730 263,570 61.7% Assessor 187,500 187,500 108,434 79,066 57.8% Contribution to DDP 180,000 180,000 180,000 - 100.0% Miscellaneous Grant Expense 25,000 25,000 - 25,000 0.0% Other Employment Expenses 463,400 442,800 - 442,800 0.0% Insurance 600,000 600,000 173,527 426,473 28.9% OPEB - Retiree’s Health Care Contribution 1,620,600 1,620,600 810,300 810,300 50.0% Police Pension Trust Contribution - State Grant 500,000 500,000 309,614 190,386 61.9% Appropriation to Emp Pension Fund - Unfunded Liability 1,310,500 1,310,500 1,310,500 - 100.0% Appropriation to Police Pension Fund 95,000 95,000 95,000 - 100.0% Street Lights 869,700 869,700 514,351 355,349 59.1% Debt Service 624,200 624,200 340,951 283,249 54.6% Provision for Uncollectible 10,000 10,000 10,000 - 100.0% Transfers Out 0.0% Capital Projects Fund 613,400 613,400 306,700 306,700 50.0% Total Expenditures 35,536,700 35,604,500 20,133,894 15,470,606 56.5% Budget Balance - Working Capital 2,834,200 2,900,200 - 2,900,200 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenditures $ 38,370,900 $ 38,504,700 $ 20,133,894 $ 18,370,806 52.3% Reserve Balances Contingency $ 731,100 $ 731,100 $ 728,839 (1) Property Taxes are the taxes billed and not cash received. The outstanding receivable balance as of 1/31/13 is $457,629.73 as compared to $684,978.96 in January 2012.

4 of 9 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report –January 2013 Water/Wastewater Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Water - unaudited $ 865,100 $ 884,600 $ - $ 884,600 0.0% Beginning Balance - Wastewater - unaudited $ 853,000 $ 867,800 $ - $ 867,800 0.0% Beginning Balance - Kent County Treatment - unaudited $ (553,500) $ (553,500) $ - $ (553,500) 0.0% 1,164,600 1,198,900 - 1,198,900 0.0% Revenues Water Fees 4,730,700 4,730,700 2,831,776 1,898,924 59.9% Wastewater Fees 3,834,600 3,834,600 2,146,406 1,688,194 56.0% Kent County Treatment Fees 3,090,800 3,090,800 1,764,550 1,326,250 57.1% Ground Water Adjustment Fees 1,257,600 1,257,600 792,015 465,585 63.0% Water Tank Leases 313,500 313,500 175,777 137,723 56.1% Interest Earnings - Water 8,700 8,700 1,851 6,849 21.3% Interest Earnings - Water/Wastewater 17,100 17,100 3,595 13,505 21.0% Miscellaneous 77,000 77,000 52,353 24,647 68.0% Impact Fees - Water 317,000 317,000 307,136 9,864 96.9% Impact Fees - Wastewater 350,000 350,000 133,192 216,808 38.1% Total Revenues 13,997,000 13,997,000 8,208,651 5,788,349 58.6% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 15,161,600 $ 15,195,900 $ 8,208,651 $ 6,987,249 54.0% Expenses Water/Wastewater Operating Divisions Engineering & Inspection $ 597,900 $ 601,900 $ 264,531 $ 337,369 43.9% Water 408,200 415,000 221,808 193,192 53.4% Water Treatment Plant 1,522,600 1,535,400 780,553 754,847 50.8% Wastewater 993,000 997,000 407,325 589,675 40.9% Construction & Inspection 345,700 353,200 189,434 163,766 53.6% Kent County Treatment Fees 3,600,000 3,600,000 1,684,292 1,915,708 46.8% Intrafund Services 1,235,400 1,235,400 638,476 596,924 51.7% Pension Unfunded Liability 309,800 309,800 309,800 - 100.0% OPEB - Retiree's Health Care Contributions 220,000 220,000 110,000 110,000 50.0% Debt Service 1,263,600 1,263,600 391,861 871,739 31.0% Inventory/Fixed Asset Write-offs 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 100.0% Other Employment Expenses 16,200 15,400 - 15,400 0.0% Transfers Out General Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 - 100.0% Uncollectible Reserve 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 100.0% Water I & E Fund 1,700,000 1,700,000 850,000 850,000 50.0% Wastewater I & E Fund 1,200,000 1,200,000 600,000 600,000 50.0% Capital Asset Reserve - Water 70,000 70,000 70,000 - 100.0% Capital Asset Reserve - Wastewater 22,000 22,000 22,000 - 100.0% Total Expenses 14,014,400 14,048,700 7,050,080 6,998,620 50.2% Budget Balances Budget Balance - Working Capital - Water 482,700 482,700 - 482,700 0.0% Budget Balance - Working Capital - WW 664,500 664,500 - 664,500 0.0% Total Budget Balances 1,147,200 1,147,200 - 1,147,200 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 15,161,600 $ 15,195,900 $ 7,050,080 $ 8,145,820 46.4% Reserve Balances Contingency-Water $ 103,724 $ 103,724 $ 103,372 Contingency-Wastewater $ 189,176 $ 189,176 $ 186,945 Impact Fee Reserve - Sewer NO BUDGET NO BUDGET $ 3,515,998 Impact Fee Reserve - Water NO BUDGET NO BUDGET $ 443,349 Bond Coverage Ratio (Covenant 1.20) 3.73 3.33 4.96

5 of 9 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report –January 2013 Electric Revenue Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - unaudited $ 7,184,000 $ 7,201,500 $ - $ 7,201,500 0.0% Revenues Sales to Customers 85,071,400 85,071,400 53,033,989 32,037,411 62.3% Utility Tax 1,595,200 1,595,200 875,720 719,480 54.9% Weyandt Hall Rents 225,000 225,000 116,467 108,533 51.8% Miscellaneous Revenues 979,700 979,700 800,384 179,316 81.7% Interest Earned 107,800 107,800 66,994 40,806 62.1% Transfer from Rate Stabilization 5,400,000 5,400,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 50.0% Intrafund Service Receipts Water/Wastewater 130,800 130,800 78,275 52,525 59.8% Total Revenues 93,509,900 93,509,900 57,671,829 35,838,071 61.7% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 100,693,900 $ 100,711,400 $ 57,671,829 $ 43,039,571 57.3% Expenses Power Supply & Generation Hedged Energy $ 39,468,900 $ 39,468,900 $ 23,201,613 $ 16,267,287 58.8% Power Supply Management/Incentive 996,000 996,000 581,000 415,000 58.3% Capacity Charges 12,564,800 12,564,800 6,591,060 5,973,740 52.5% Dover Sun Park Energy 1,414,500 1,414,500 798,689 615,811 56.5% Solar Renewal Energy Credits - 351,600 170,641 180,959 48.5% PJM Charges - Energy 17,508,300 13,752,300 3,366,314 10,385,986 24.5% PJM Charges - Transmission & Fees - 3,756,000 4,535,744 (779,744) 120.8% Total Power Supply 71,952,500 72,304,100 39,245,061 33,059,039 54.3% Plant Operations 5,914,900 5,914,900 3,156,340 2,758,560 53.4% Generation Fuels 586,000 586,000 952,227 (366,227) 162.5% Capacity Credits (14,318,600) (14,318,600) (8,364,038) (5,954,562) 58.4% PJM Spot Market Energy (772,700) (1,124,300) (1,865,604) 741,304 165.9% PJM Credits (427,000) (427,000) (310,505) (116,495) 72.7% Total Generation (9,017,400) (9,369,000) (6,431,580) (2,937,420) 68.6% Total Power Supply & Plant 62,935,100 62,935,100 32,813,481 30,121,619 52.1% Electric Operating Divisions: Transmission/Distribution 3,223,600 3,233,700 1,919,823 1,313,877 59.4% Electrical Engineering 1,163,900 1,171,300 592,861 578,439 50.6% Administration 501,200 501,200 210,046 291,154 41.9% Meter Reading 212,500 212,500 125,286 87,214 59.0% Systems Operations 517,600 526,300 314,156 212,144 59.7% Intrafund Services 3,224,500 3,224,500 1,762,029 1,462,471 54.6% Utility Tax 1,595,200 1,595,200 875,721 719,479 54.9% OPEB - Retirees Health Care Contribution 696,500 696,500 348,250 348,250 50.0% Pension Trust Contribution - Unfunded liability 1,074,200 1,074,200 1,074,200 - 100.0% Interest on Deposits 35,000 35,000 16,146 18,854 46.1% Green Energy Payment to DEMEC 129,000 129,000 86,058 42,942 66.7% Accounts Receivable Write-Offs 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 100.0% Inventory Write-Offs 175,000 175,000 175,000 - 100.0% Other Employee Expenses 157,900 149,200 - 149,200 0.0% Contractual Services Power Supply 190,000 190,000 35,413 154,587 18.6% Debt Service 3,323,600 3,323,600 1,970,079 1,353,521 59.3% Transfers Out: General Fund 8,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 2,000,000 75.0% Electric Improvement & Extension Fund 3,500,000 3,500,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 50.0% Total Expenses 90,804,800 90,822,300 50,218,549 40,603,751 55.3% Budget Balance - Working Capital 9,889,100 9,889,100 - 9,889,100 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenses $ 100,693,900 $ 100,711,400 $ 50,218,549 $ 50,492,851 49.9% Reserve Balances Contingency Reserve $ 816,200 $ 816,200 $ 808,529 Insurance Reserve $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 727,904 Rate Stabilization Reserve $ 4,947,600 $ 4,947,600 $ 7,631,498 Bond Coverage Ratio (Covenant 1.25) 2.74 2.87 5.78 Megawatt Hours Sold & Purchased Sales to Customers MWh (excluding Street Light MWh) 709,972 709,972 444,907 62.7% Sales per MWh $ 119.824 $ 119.824 $ 119.202 99.5% Purchased/Generated MWh 750,296 750,297 447,764 59.7% All In MWh Supply & Generation 83.88 $ 83.880 $ 73.283 87.4%

6 of 9 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report –January 2013 General Capital Project Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Projects - unaudited $ 294,400 $ 241,100 $ - $ 241,100 0.0% Beginning Balance - Library - unaudited $ - $ (95,500) $ - $ (95,500) 0.0% Revenues State Grant - Other 108,000 158,000 156,381 1,619 99.0% Interest Earnings - - 8,212 (8,212) 0.0% Income from Sale of Assets - - - - 0.0% Loan Proceeds - Streets, City Hall 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 0.0% Loan Proceeds - Garrison Farm 2,000,000 - - - 0.0% Transfer from General Fund for Projects 613,400 613,400 306,700 306,700 50.0% Police Grant 33,800 33,800 - 33,800 0.0% Transfer from Future Capacity Reserve - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 0.0% MSA Capital Contribution - 132,200 - 132,200 0.0% Subtotal Project Receipts 4,755,200 4,937,400 471,293 4,466,107 State Grant - Library 884,200 1,912,700 1,500,324 412,376 78.4% Loan Proceeds - Library Green Energy Project - 648,500 648,500 - 100.0% Kent County Library Contribution 250,000 250,000 250,000 - 100.0% Transfer from Library Foundation 67,500 - - - 0.0% Library Donations - 173,400 434,820 (261,420) 250.8% Income from Sale of Library/Bridge Loan 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 - 100.0% Subtotal Library Project Receipts 2,401,700 4,184,600 4,033,644 150,956 96.4% Total Revenues 7,156,900 9,122,000 4,504,937 4,617,063 49.4% Total Beginning Balance & Revenue $ 7,451,300 $ 9,267,600 $ 4,504,937 $ 4,762,663 48.6% Expenditures Fire $ 238,500 $ 238,500 $ 238,515 $ (15) 100.0% Grounds Maintenance 112,000 112,000 - 112,000 0.0% Library 2,535,000 4,089,100 3,299,238 789,862 80.7% Recreation 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 0.0% Police 197,000 197,000 171,304 25,696 87.0% Streets (1) 1,974,000 2,144,200 20,747 2,123,453 1.0% Sanitation 150,000 150,000 - 150,000 0.0% Information Technology 57,000 107,000 50,198 56,802 46.9% Facilities Management 381,000 381,000 96,275 284,725 25.3% Mayor 33,000 33,000 33,000 - 100.0% Loan Issuance Costs 56,000 - 1,029 (1,029) 0.0% Transfer to Community Transportation Fund 1,606,700 1,606,700 - 1,606,700 0.0% Total Expenditures 7,370,200 9,088,500 3,910,306 5,178,194 43.0% Budget Balance - Projects 81,100 179,100 - 179,100 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenditures $ 7,451,300 $ 9,267,600 $ 3,910,306 $ 5,357,294 42.2% Reserve Balances Capital Asset Replacement Reserve $ 503,000 $ 503,000 $ 503,752 Parkland/Recreation $ 202,600 $ 202,600 $ 201,393 (1) Street program - Budget includes $2 million for street repaving and City Hall improvements to be completed over two years (Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013). Will be funded by bond issue or commercial bank loan.

7 of 9 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report –January 2013 Water/Wastewater Improvement & Extension Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Water - unaudited $ 3,071,800 $ 3,811,200 $ - $ 3,811,200 0.0% Beginning Balance - Wastewater - unaudited $ 1,013,600 $ 2,641,000 $ - $ 2,641,000 0.0% Revenues Bond Proceeds - Water 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 0.0% Bond Proceeds - Wastewater 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 0.0% State Loan-Wastewater 2011 - - 297,239 (297,239) 0.0% Income from Sale of Assets - - 4,171 (4,171) 0.0% Interest Earned 25,000 25,000 54,301 (29,301) 217.2% Transfer from Water Operating Fund for Water 1,700,000 1,700,000 850,000 850,000 50.0% Transfer from Wastewater Operating Fund for Wastewater 1,200,000 1,200,000 600,000 600,000 50.0% Transfer from Impact Fee Reserve - Water 300,000 300,000 - 300,000 0.0% Transfer from Impact Fee Reserve - Wastewater 250,000 250,000 - 250,000 0.0% Total Revenues 7,475,000 7,475,000 1,805,711 5,669,289 24.2% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 11,560,400 $ 13,927,200 $ 1,805,711 $ 12,121,489 13.0% Expenses Bond Issue Costs $ 344,000 $ 344,000 $ 4,739 $ 339,261 1.4% Engineering & Inspection 23,400 23,400 - 23,400 0.0% Water 5,140,000 5,762,600 334,764 5,427,836 5.8% Wastewater 3,817,300 5,798,400 777,646 5,020,754 13.4% Water Treatment Plant 24,100 24,100 - 24,100 0.0% Water Construction 31,000 31,000 35,890 (4,890) 115.8% Total Expenses 9,379,800 11,983,500 1,153,039 10,830,461 9.6% Budget Balance - Working Capital - Water 1,675,500 1,772,300 - 1,772,300 0.0% Budget Balance - Working Capital - Wastewater 505,100 171,400 - 171,400 0.0% Total Budget Balances 2,180,600 1,943,700 - 1,943,700 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 11,560,400 $ 13,927,200 $ 1,153,039 $ 12,774,161 8.3% Reserve Balances Capital Asset Replacement - Water $ 501,100 $ 501,100 $ 501,898 Capital Asset Replacement - Wastewater $ 501,100 $ 501,100 $ 500,749

8 of 9 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report –January 2013 Electric Improvement & Extension Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - unaudited $ 2,714,600 $ 3,534,600 $ - $ 3,534,600 0.0% Revenues Interest Earnings 40,700 40,700 26,420 14,280 64.9% Income from Sale of Assets - - 5,203 (5,203) 0.0% Transfer from Electric Revenue Fund 3,500,000 3,500,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 50.0% Transfer from Future Capacity Reserve 550,000 550,000 550,000 - 100.0% Total Revenues 4,090,700 4,090,700 2,331,623 1,759,077 57.0% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 6,805,300 $ 7,625,300 $ 2,331,623 $ 5,293,677 30.6% Expenses Power Plant $ 1,441,300 $ 1,786,600 $ 282,602 $ 1,503,998 15.8% Transmission/Distribution 596,000 896,000 576,200 319,800 64.3% Electrical Engineering 1,932,700 1,942,800 576,274 1,366,526 29.7% Total Expenses 3,970,000 4,625,400 1,435,076 3,190,324 31.0% Budget Balance - Working Capital 2,835,300 2,999,900 - 2,999,900 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenses $ 6,805,300 $ 7,625,300 $ 1,435,076 $ 6,190,224 18.8% Reserve Balances Depreciation Reserve $ 9,864,800 $ 9,864,800 $ 9,786,611 Future Capacity Reserve $ 9,362,000 $ 9,362,000 $ 9,302,635 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report –January 2013 Community Transportation Improvement Fund Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - unaudited $ 435,700 $ 435,700 $ - $ 435,700 0.0% Revenues Grants Revenue 300,000 300,000 4,497 295,503 1.5% Transfer from General Capital Project Fund 1,606,700 1,606,700 - 1,606,700 0.0% Interest Earned 500 500 11 489 2.2% Total Revenues 1,907,200 1,907,200 4,508 1,902,692 0.2% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 2,342,900 $ 2,342,900 $ 4,508 $ 2,338,392 0.2% Expenses Program Expenses $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 62,677 $ 637,323 9.0% Program Expenses - City appropriated 1,546,700 1,546,700 - 1,546,700 0.0% Program Expenses- Concrete Program 60,000 60,000 6,199 53,801 10.3% Total Expenses 2,306,700 2,306,700 68,876 2,237,824 3.0% Budget Balance - Working Capital 36,200 36,200 - 36,200 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 2,342,900 $ 2,342,900 $ 68,876 $ 2,274,024 2.9%

9 of 9 CITY OF DOVER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN UNRESERVED FUND PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2013 CDBG/NSP SUBSTANCE POLICE LIBRARY HOUSING ABUSE PREV. GRANTS GRANTS GRANTS GRANT TOTALS REVENUES: State Grants received $ 66,676 $ - $ - $ 33,567 $ 100,243 Federal Grants received 187,534 1,275 344,850 - 533,659 Recreation revenue - - - 5,736 5,736 Investment income (loss) 66 - - 2 68 TOTAL REVENUES $ 254,276 $ 1,275 $ 344,850 $ 39,305 $ 639,706 EXPENDITURES: Program expenditures $ 234,537 $ 98,862 $ - $ 44,965 $ 378,364 Program expenditures - NSP - - 201,083 - 201,083 Program expenditures - CDBG - - 139,858 - 139,858 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 234,537 $ 98,862 $ 340,941 $ 44,965 $ 719,305 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures $ 19,739 $ (97,587) $ 3,909 $ (5,660) $ (79,599) Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers-out (35,318) - - - (35,318) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures & other uses $ (15,579) $ (97,587) $ 3,909 $ (5,660) $ (114,917) FUND BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF YEAR $ 178,432 $ 30,008 $ 16,197 $ 21,620 $ 246,257 FUND BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD $ 162,853 $ (67,579) $ 20,106 $ 15,960 $ 131,340

Dover Police Department Monthly Report To Mayor and City Council “To Protect and Serve” January 2013

February 27, 2013 Honorable Carleton E. Carey, Sr., Mayor Members of Dover City Council City Hall Dover, DE 19901 Mayor Carey and Council Members: The following is the monthly report for Dover Police Department activities for the month of January 2013: COMPLAINTS st Total complaints received through January 31 numbered 2,927. This is an increase of 67 complaints over the same time period last year. 5,000 4,000 2860 2927 3,000 2382 2470 2071 2,000 1,000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS 20 Cases Reported in 16 January 13 10 12 Cases Cleared in 8 7 January 8 6 6 Cases Cleared 4 2 0 from Previous 0 Months 0 Burglary Robbery Rape

Report to Mayor and Council January 2013 Page 2 COMMUNITY POLICE SECTION ENFORCEMENT ACTION Contacts ABANDONED VEHICLES 0 ALCOHOL VIOLATIONS/DUI’S 3 ASSIST OTHER 4 WARRANTS ON FILE 0 BIKE ON SIDEWALK 0 CITY PARK VIOLATIONS 2 CRIMINAL ARRESTS 9 DRUG RELATED ARRESTS 0 LOUD MUSIC 0 MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS 25 PARKING VIOLATIONS 26 PEDDLER 1 MEETINGS 100 PROSTITUTION 0 COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT 0 DCO’S WANTED CHECKS/CPC’S 17 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 48 WARNINGS 12 FUGITIVE 9 TOTAL CONTACTS 256 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 4,000 The department issued 1,363 traffic citations through this reporting period. This is a decrease 3,000 of 205 citations over the number issued during the same period last year. 1,953 1,948 2,000 1,676 1,568 1,363 1,000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 TRAFFIC CRASHES st Through January 31 , Dover Police investigated 140 traffic crashes. This is a decrease of 12 crashes investigated during the same period last year. 300 250 200 151 152 134 138 140 150 100 50 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Report to Mayor and Council January 2013 Page 3 911 CENTER During the month of January, our 911 Center handled a total of 9,483 calls averaging 306 calls 25% per day. Dispatchers handled 2,380 calls on the 911 wireless lines, an average of 77 calls per day, 664 calls on the 911 landlines, an average of 22 911 Wireless calls per day, and 164 calls on the Voice Over Internet Protocol lines with an average of 6 calls 911 Landline per day. 7% VolP 66% 2% Administrative CITY ORDINANCE SUMMONS st 1,000 Through January 31 , we issued 641 City ordinance summons, an increase of 788 71 summons over the same period last 800 722 641 year. *Note: Of those summonses issued 629 570 in January, 15 DCO’s were issued for 600 451 468 457 2,623 handicapped parking violations, 16 for fire 362 lane parking violations, 66 for false alarms 400 (30 for 3-5 alarms, 22 for 6-9 alarms, 10 for 10-15 alarms, and 3 for 16 or more 200 alarms) and 4 for noise violations (1 for vehicle violations and 3 for residence 0 violations). 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ISSUED PAID Listed below are the major crimes and activities that occurred during the month of January: • On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 at 0415 hours, Dover Police Patrol Officers responded to a reported shooting in the 930 Building of Whatcoat Village Apartments. The 39 year old male victim was located inside the stairwell of the building with a gunshot wound to the neck. The victim was transported to Bayhealth/Kent General Hospital for treatment and was released a short time later. The Dover Police Criminal Investigations Unit began their investigation into the incident, however, the victim refused to cooperate in the investigation or the identification of the suspect. There is no known motive for the shooting at this time. • On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 at 2315 hours, officers from The Dover Police Drug, Vice and Organized Crime Unit / Operation Safe Streets with the assistance of the Delaware State Police Governor’s Task Force arrested defendant, BM 36. Defendant was arrested as a result of the joint drug investigation at a hotel room at 764 Leipsic Road, (Comfort Inn and Suites) Dover, DE. Officers knew the defendant was wanted on outstanding warrants. As they attempted to contact him at the hotel room, he ran from officers and resisted arrest as he attempted to flush some of the drugs down the toilet. A search of the hotel room revealed 23 bags of Heroin, 6.8 grams of Crack Cocaine, 23 Hydrocodone Pills and $644.00 of suspected drug money. The defendant was wanted on numerous outstanding warrants from Smyrna Police Department and also had numerous bench warrants from court. • On Saturday, January 5, 2013 at 2356 hours, Dover Police Patrol Officers responded to a reported shooting victim who arrived at Bayhealth/Kent General Hospital ER. The 22 year old male victim stated he was shot in the left arm in the area of S. Kirkwood Street by an unknown suspect. The Dover Police Criminal Investigations Unit began their investigation into the incident and believed the suspect was shot with a shotgun containing bird or steel shot (numerous small pellets). However, the victim refused to cooperate in the investigation or the identification of the suspect. A spent shotgun shell

consistent with the victim's wound was located in the area of 39 S. Kirkwood Street. There is no known motive for the shooting at this time. • The Dover Police Criminal Investigations Unit is currently investigating a burglary at 231 N. New Street. The burglary occurred between Monday, December 10, 2012 and Friday, January 4, 2013. The suspect entered the residence through a window. Once inside the suspect removed electronic equipment and fled undetected. • On Monday, January 7, 2013 at approximately 1700 hours, officers from The Dover Police Drug, Vice and Organized Crime Unit and Operation Safe Streets arrested defendant WM23. Defendant was arrested as a result of a drug investigation at his residence in the 200 block of Pebble Valley Place, Dover, DE. A search of the defendant’s bedroom revealed 219.1 grams of marijuana. • The Dover Police Criminal Investigations Unit is currently investigating a burglary at 42 N. Governors Ave. The burglary occurred between Friday, January 4, 2013 and Friday, January 11, 2013. The suspect entered the residence through a window. Once inside the suspect removed jewelry, a camera and other miscellaneous items and fled undetected. • On Sunday January 13, 2013 at approximately 2100 hours, two white male suspects wearing hooded sweatshirts entered the Walgreens Pharmacy located at 1215 S. State St. and displayed a large hunting knife, then demanded money from the clerk. They fled the business eastbound on foot on Roosevelt Ave with an undetermined amount of cash. One suspect was described as 5’10”-6’stocky build with a goatee, 25-35 years of age. The other was described as same height, medium build in his 50’s. No one was injured during the incident. • On Sunday January 13, 2013 at approximately 1830 hours, a dark colored vehicle pulled up in front of a residence in the unit block of Ann Ave and approximately 5 to 6 shots were fired into the residence and at the open garage where two people were seated. A 44 year old female was struck in the back by what appeared to be a ricochet or small fragment from the round. The victim was treated and released from Bay Health for the minor injury. Shell casings recovered at the scene indicated a 9mm handgun was used. • On January 16, 2013 the Dover Police arrested defendant, 28, of Columbia MD, for two counts of Rape 3rd after investigation revealed that he had a sexual relationship with a 15 year old female. Defendant was apprehended by detectives at a hotel in Dover where he came to meet the victim. • The Dover Police Criminal Investigation Unit would like to make citizens aware of a scam being advertised on Craig’s List. Detectives have taken several complaints from victims who have used Craig’s List to locate apartments and or rental homes in the Dover area. The victims have contacted an individual who has them sign a contract and provide money up front. The locations in question are already legally occupied and unable to be leased. The victims are then unable to re- contact the scammers after the money is provided. Just use caution if you are in the market to rent and are conducting business solely through the internet. • On Friday January 18, 2013, officers from the Dover Police Department Drug, Vice and Organized Crime Unit along with the Safe Streets Unit executed a search warrant at 170 Mitscher Road, Dover. As a result of the search warrant officers located 110 bags of heroin, $6,003.00, 7 grams marijuana, .4 grams cocaine, one 9mm semiautomatic handgun, one 44 magnum revolver and arrested two adult male defendants. • On Sunday January 20 at approximately 0600 hours, a 30 year old female victim awoke to find an acquaintance having sexual intercourse with her without her consent. The victim and several friends rented a room at a Dover Hotel on S. DuPont Hwy Saturday for a small party. One female witness invited several friends to the room, which included the suspect. Sometime during the early hours on Sunday the victim went into her room and fell asleep as several guests remained in the other room. At approximately 0600 the victim awoke to find the defendant, 26, having sex with her. As the victim realized what was happening she kicked the defendant off of her and ran into the bathroom with her clothes that he had removed. The victim began screaming and the defendant fled on foot. Officers located the defendant a short distance from the hotel and placed him in custody. • On Sunday January 20 at approximately 0130 hours an 18 year old male victim was driving south bound in the Unit Block of South Governors Avenue. The victim observed an SUV turning around in the street and he stopped. Victim also observed a large group of subjects standing just beyond the SUV. Victim then observed a male wearing all black clothing pointing a gun in his direction. The suspect then fired several rounds striking the victims vehicle. The victim reversed and fled without be injured. Officers responded and discovered a parked vehicle was also damaged by gunfire. This incident is believed to stem from an earlier altercation and that the person in the SUV was the possible target and victim was caught in the cross fire. On Friday, January 25, 2013 Dover Police Detectives from the Criminal Investigation Unit/Detective Section with assistance from Detectives from the Drug, Vice and Organized Crime Section along with Operation Safe Streets obtained arrest warrants for the defendant, BM 26, for the above shooting on S. Governor’s Avenue. Their investigation revealed the shooting was a result of a physical altercation that occurred IFO 26 S. Governors Avenue involving numerous subjects. Defendant was arrested a short time later by the Community Policing Section without incident. • On Sunday January 20 at approximately 0050 hours a Dover Police K-9 officer was patrolling the downtown area when he heard a subject screaming for the police while being chased by two suspects in the 100 block of South Governors Avenue. As the officer drove towards them, the suspects fled to a waiting vehicle. The officer pursued the vehicle onto S. New Street where it pulled over. With the assistance of additional Dover officers, three suspects were taken into custody, a small caliber handgun and three bandanas were also confiscated from the vehicle. It was determined that two of the suspects had covered their faces with the bandanas, displayed the handgun at the victim and demanded money while the third suspect waited in the vehicle to drive them from the scene; the victim fled when he observed the patrol car. Three defendants were arrested. • On Tuesday January 22, 2013 at approximately 1230 hours, the Dover Police responded to the Sleep Inn, located at 1784 N. DuPont Hwy, for a report of a handgun left in one of the rooms. Detectives found a .25 cal handgun, and both .25 and 9mm ammunition, along with multiple items of drug paraphernalia in the room. Investigation revealed that the defendant, BM of Chestertown MD, had possessed these items. Officers awaited his return to the hotel after determining that he was

a person prohibited from possessing a firearm. Upon his return, he fled in a vehicle and nearly struck one of the officers. A pursuit ensued which ended in the WalMart Parking lot north of Dover where defendant was apprehended and found to be a fugitive from Maryland. • On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 at 2317 hours, the Dover Police Department Drug, Vice and Organized Crime Unit along with Operation Safe Streets Unit stopped a vehicle for a traffic violation. Officers then observed the front passenger attempting to swallow a bag of suspected marijuana. After officers removed the suspect from the vehicle, he attempted to flee on foot. The suspect was apprehended after a struggle with officers. 6.9 grams of marijuana was recovered. • On January 29, 2013 at approximately 1130 hours, the Dover Police received a report of a burglary in progress in the 400 block of Cold Spring Place. The two suspects, 16 and 17 years of age, were damaging the rear door attempting to gain entry into the residence. Responding officers then stopped the two suspects as they were leaving the area in a white BMW and apprehended both during the traffic stop. A search of the vehicle yielded stolen property from several burglaries in the Dover area. Defendants were charged with burglaries and related charges from Green Blade Dr., Seskinore Ct., Bacon Ave., and Nimitz Rd., as well as the attempted burglary at Cold Spring Pl.. • On January 29, 2013 the Dover Police arrested defendant. WM 25 of Dover, for a string of burglaries occurring on the west side of the city. Investigation revealed that defendant committed a burglary in the 1400 block of S. Farmview Dr, 3 burglaries at Ruben Trucking located at 1575 McKee Rd., and a burglary in the 300 block of Northdown Dr. in the Village of Westover. Respectfully Submitted, James E. Hosfelt, Jr. Chief of Police

Monthly Report January 2013 Office of City Assessor

••‡••‘”ǯ•‡’‘”– NumberofDeedsStampedforthe TransferTaxDollarAmountforthe MonthofJanuary2012/2013 MonthofJanuary2012/2013 28 $400 $331 30 26 Thousands 25 20 14 13 9 10 $200 15 $37 $11 $16 10 3 2 2013 $26 $12 $11 $0 2013 1 0 5 $0 0 2012 2012 FirstTimeBuyerforMonthof January2012/2013Realty January2012/2013 PropertySalesinDollarsReceived PriortoRecording 14 15 13 10 Res.NonͲFirst $30 $22 9 Millions 10 TimeBuyers $20 $2 $2 $2$2 $1 $1 $0 Res.FirstTime 2013 $10 Buyers $0 5 2012 0 2013 2012 MajorUpdates NovemberͲ12  DecemberͲ12 JanuaryͲ13 AssessmentChange $1,056,900 Ͳ$1,011,900 $2,141,400  ResidentialSalesRatioReport SalesinStudy TotalAssessedValue TotalSalePric e Ratio PRD 15 $2,793,900 $2,771,300 1.00 1.04  Ratio–AssessedValuedividedbySalePrice. PRD–Mean–APRDabove1.03tendstoindicateassessmentregressivity–highvaluedpropertiesareunder appraisedrelativetolowvaluedproperties.APRDbelow.98tendstoindicateassessmentprogressivity–high valuedpropertiesarerelativelyoverappraised.  1

••‡••‘”ǯ•‡’‘”–  PointsofInterest  Scanning&Filing  ͲAllnewdeedsarebeingscannedandattachedtotheCAMAsoftwareforeasyretrieval.  ͲAllappealdocumentsandcorrespondencearebeingscannedandattachedtotheCAMAsoftwarefor easyretrieval.  ͲAlloldpropertyrecordcardsarebeingscannedandindexedintoFortis.   2015Revaluation  ͲTheAssessor’sOfficehasstartedthe2015Revaluationprocessbyvisitingvariousneighborhoods andcollectingdata,ifnecessary.  Assessor’sOffice  SupplementalBilling  ͲSupplementalbillsweremailedouttotaling$8,439.30    2

FEB 20, 2013 CITY OF DOVER PAGE: 1 12:32 PM SALES RATIO REPORT CA324 PARID NBHD LUC ADDRESS UNITS STYLE YRBLT STORIES SFLA GRADE CDU TOTAL APPR SALE DT PRICE ASR ED05-066.12-01-34.00 3 R10 99 PINE VALLEY RD 1 5 1984 2 3800 B+ GD 344,300 08-JAN-13 410,000 ED05-067.09-01-06.00 3A R10 518 TROON RD 1 5 1980 2 2748 B GD 301,700 10-JAN-13 263,500 ED05-067.12-03-19.00 8B R10 939 SILVER LAKE DR 1 13 1983 2 2120 B VG 203,700 07-JAN-13 202,000 ED05-067.17-01-75.00 20 R10 33 SCIOTO CT 1 5 1973 2 2114 C+ AV 192,400 25-JAN-13 199,500 ED05-068.10-04-17.00 16L R10 12 ANCHOR LN 1 5 2001 2 1772 C+ AV 164,700 30-JAN-13 148,000 ED05-068.17-02-48.00 8 R10 222 N STATE ST 1 1 1900 2 2481 B- GD 211,800 30-JAN-13 269,000 ED05-068.18-03-68.00 27 R10 1008 E DIVISION ST 1 14 1954 1 1320 C GD 144,900 29-JAN-13 149,900 ED05-076.05-02-52.00 16D R10 42 TALLOWICK LN 1 5 1987 2 1448 C+ AV 141,800 30-JAN-13 163,000 ED05-076.10-02-50.00 16A R10 1444 WOODMILL DR 1 14 1990 1 1401 C+ AV 172,200 29-JAN-13 180,000 ED05-076.13-02-29.00 25 R10 115 THAMES DR 1 13 1995 2 2024 C+ AV 145,000 07-JAN-13 110,000 ED05-077.06-01-13.00 8 R10 51 PARK DR 1 1 1940 1 1394 C+ GD 172,000 28-JAN-13 158,500 ED05-077.06-02-60.01 27 R10 783 E LOOCKERMAN ST 1 3 1981 1 2003 C+ AV 175,300 15-JAN-13 155,000 ED05-077.07-01-36.00 16I R10 55 MORIARTY ST 1 13 2006 2 1296 C AV 127,600 30-JAN-13 95,000 ED05-085.11-01-50.00 12 R10 142 TURNER DR 1 14 1968 1 1103 C AV 152,300 30-JAN-13 135,000 ED05-085.12-01-75.00 12 R10 345 KESSELRING AVE 1 5 1966 2 1660 C+ FR 144,200 31-JAN-13 132,900

CITY MANAGER’S MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY 2013 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013

Customer Services  As of January 31, 2013, we processed 1,917 payments for the month.  City of Dover property taxes were due July 31, 2012. As of January 31, 2013, the delinquent property taxes total $459,686.66 for all tax years plus penalties. Our collection efforts include sending a delinquent state- ment, making phone calls, and enforcing the Clean Hands Act. The Planning and Inspections Department has been providing assistance in collecting these outstanding debts. In December, the properties over one (1) year delinquent were selected to be processed for the monition sale. There are currently 60 properties in the monition process. Human Resources  Continued contract negotiations with DOE bargaining unit Library  514 attended 26 programs for adults.  42 attended 12 programs for teens.  1,180 attended 52 programs for children.  242 attended 18 programs/classes coordinated through the Job Center. Public Works  Working on CIP and additional funding for future street program and other projects. 2 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013

CUSTOMER SERVICES WORK ORDERS PROCESSED Extensions of Credit 3,000 400 2,500 2,349 297 300 248 251 1,920 223 231 228 2,000 1,783 1,836 188 207 1,658 1,658 1,730 1,576 184 168 156 1,576 1,6551,652 1,50 9 200 157 159 1,500 1,350 100 1,000 500 0 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov-Dec- Jan- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 CUSTOMER PAYMENT USAGE CUTS FOR NON PAYMENT 80,000 $2,000,000 60,000 $1,600,000 38,334 $1,260,348 40,000 36,130 $1,200,000 16,345 $738,422 17,096 13,224 $800,000 20,000 13,320 86 69 $400,000 $ 163,948 0 $150,657 Drive-Thru Over the Mail, Drop Credit Bank Drafts $- Window Counter Box Cards January 2013 Januaary 2013 FYTD13 FYTD12 2013 YTD 2012YTD FY 2013 FY 2012 Major Program Updates Jan 2013 Jan 2012 Difference Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Number of Customers Served 21,453 21,703 (250) 167,695 167,755 Final Bills 498 585 (87) 4,382 4,687 Estimated Bills 164 159 5 1,090 1,095 Penalties Posted $ 18,920 $ 20,734 (1,814) $ 139,106 $ 134,035 Extensions of Credit - Amount Extended $ 75,526 $ 90,052 (14,526) $ 602,117 $ 1,304,052 Balance Transfers $ 3,901 $ 438 3,462 $ 17,368 $ 11,743 Utility Collections $ 16,752 $ 27,124 (10,372) $ 159,485 $ 207,318 Special Assessments $ - $ - - $ 659 $ 110 Miscellaneous Billings $ 142,941 $ 158,332 (15,392) $ 868,684 $ 1,028,263 CNP through Disconnect Collars $ 19 $ 32 (13) 220 93 Court Cases - - - - - Tamperings - 7 (7) 18 33 Taxes Levied (includes carry forward) $ 10,901,726 $ 833,863 10,067,863 $ 65,410,357 $ 8,241,542 Billing Adjustments $ 10,837 $ - 10,837 $ 33,249 $ 20,170 Total Taxes Collected $ 10,253,053 $ 139,077 10,113,977 $ - $ 10,225,290 Taxes Outstanding $ 459,687 $ 694,787 (235,100) $ - $ 694,787 Payments in Lieu $ 10,000 $ - 10,000 $ 38,450 $ - Billing Accuracy (on schedule billings) 99.0% 99.0% - 99.0% 99.0% Bills Published on Schedule 99.0% 99.0% - 99.9% 99.9% Meters Read on Schedule 99.9% 99.9% - 99.9% 99.9% Customer Satisfaction Rating 99.9% 99.9% - 99.7% 99.7% Delinquent Accounts Collected 99.7% 99.7% - 99.8% 99.8% City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013 3

HUMAN RESOURCES Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Category Total 12 12 12 12 12 12 2012** 2012 12 12 12 12 13 Caucasian* 295 294* 291 289 290 285 286 282 286 285 283 287 288 N/A * Minorities 59 59* 57 56 57 58 59 58 58 58 57 57 56 N/A Hired 0 2 0 0 2 6 0 1 5 0 1 6 3 26 Terminated/Resigned/ 4 3 5 3 2 5 0 5 1 0 4 2 3 37 Retired/Other Transferred/Promoted 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 8 Jobs Posted 0 0 3 4 2 2 0 4 1 2 4 0 4 26 Workers Comp. Inju- 3 3 6 2 2 1 4 2 2 5 0 4 3 37 ries Workers Comp. Hours 315 222 55 195 112 139 164 192 160 66 138 341 363 2462 Insurance Claims 1 2 4 3 6 2 3 1 3 3 4 2 5 39 Full-time Employees: 329 Part-time Employees: 15 (3 Pitts Center, 1 Recreation, 11 Library) -Numbers do not reflect, temporary, seasonal, relief fire dispatchers, committee or council members. * Correction to February 2012; **Correction to July 2012 Position Terminated: MEO I Position Transferred: Administrative Assistant in Inspections to Administrative Assistant IT Department; Animal Control Officer to Building Craftsperson, Communication Officer to Animal Control Officer Hired: Water Treatment Plant Operator I, Police Communication Operator, Police Officer Positions Posted: Account Clerk II, Customer Service; Account Clerk III, Customer Service; Inspector II, Fire Marshall; Lineman 1 st Class I (2 positions) Resigned: Billing Clerk Recruitment Information (Job posting closed in January) Asian/ American Indi- Out Un- In Position Total Female Male Black White Hispanic Pacific Is- an/Alaskan Na- known Dover Do- lander tive ver Inspector II, Fire Marshall 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lineman 1st Class I 6 0 6 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 5 Unfilled/Open Positions by Department* Unfilled/Open Positions Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan By Department 12** 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 Electric 5 5 5 5 3 3 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 Public Works 9 11 13 13 15 16 9 12 13 12 12 14 13 Police 3 1 2 3 2 4 3 4 5 5 5 4 1 All Other Departments 11.5 12 13 15 14 15 8 9 6 6 7 7 7.5 Totals 28.5 29 33 36 34 38 21 27 26 26 27 26 25.5 *Not used for Budgeting Purposes **Organization Change ² The following has been updated to reflected the Fiscal 2012-13 Budget Electric: Electric Director, Electrical Engineer, Senior Lineman, Line Crew Superintendent (on terminal leave); Public Works: (2) Utility Maintenance Mechanic I/ Wastewater, (2) Motor Equipment Operator I and II/Sanitation, Vehicle Maintenance -Mechanic I, Operations -Construction Manager, Buildings Craftsperson I & II, Custodian, Water/Wastewater Manager, (1) Motor Equipment Operator I/Streets, Motor Equipment Operation I (water), Motor Equipment Operator I (grounds) Police: Records Unit Supervisor All Other Departments: Library Clerk II, Library Assistant, Account Clerk III, Librarian, Inspector II (Fire Marshall); Administrative Assistant (Inspections); Building Supervisor (part-time) 4 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013

HUMAN RESOURCES continued Workers Comp Injuries 20 15 10 5 0 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul-12 Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 Electric Public Works Police Others Electric: 0 Public Works: 1 Police: 2 All Other Depts.: 0 Turnover Statistics 2010 2011 2012* 2013 (CYD) Total Turnover % 5.57 6.75 11.00 0.87 Termination Turnover % 0.27 1.08 0.29 0.29 Resignation Turnover % 2.12 4.05 5.21 0.29 Retirement Turnover % 3.18 1.62 5.50 0.29 * Healthcare cost sharing implemented Average Employees 2010 2011 2012* 2013(YTD) Total Number of Employees Separating from Service 21 25 38 3 Average Number of Full-time Employees 362 356 333 329 Average Number of Part-time Employees 16 15 12 15 * Healthcare cost sharing implemented City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013 5

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Service Requests Resolved Citizen Action Center - Customers w/ New Issues 250 234 221 150 202 206 198 192 200 186 182 179 177 130 171 162 144 110 150 90 100 70 50 100 94 100 50 86 86 82 48 60 57 61 30 45 58 0 31 10 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 Programming Requests Completed Page Views - City of Dover Web Page 30 28 30,000 24 23 25 21 21 25,000 20 16 16 17 Pages Viewed 20,000 15 15 14 12 13 27,002 15 15,000 20,942 22,051 22,828 22,905 23,096 19,853 19,936 20,685 18,886 19,308 19,853 17,542 10 10,000 5 5,000 0 0 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 Current Performance Indicators Last Month Same Month Month Last Year iSeries Availability 100% 100% 100% Server Availability 100% 100% 100% AS/400 Connections (concurrent/authorized users) N/A N/A N/A PCs Supported 358 356 341 Scheduled PCs Replaced - - - Servers Supported 14 14 16 People Trained 4 19 4 Availability Statistics based on 7:00 AM until 5:00 PM Monday—Friday 6 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013

LIBRARY Adult Services Childrens Services 1000 1000 500 500 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 Reference Reader's Advisory Electronic Assistance Reference Reader's Advisory Electronic Assistance Reference – 295; Reader’s Advisory – 224; Reference - 402; Reader’s Advisory – 159; Electronic Assistance – 354 Electronic Assistance – 116 ****We have amended our Electronic Assistance, Reader's Advisory & Reference transactions to more accurately represent the actual statistics.*** Circulation Jan 13 FYTD 13 Jan 12 FYTD 12 Dover residents 21,231 128,018 16,070 114,729 Ebooks 1,132 6,193 725 1,012 Kent residents* 16,349 98,821 14,024 100,468 Non-county residents 2,283 14,216 2,102 12,162 Registrations Dover residents 427 2,551 197 1,365 Kent residents* 187 771 80 554 Non-county residents 12 77 8 69 Other Visiting Patrons 30,271 184,506 29,582 217,372 Meeting Room Usage 1,177 5,662 80 440 Photocopier Usage 2,034 8,651 1,332 9,181 Dial-A-Story N/A 1,911 607 6,658 Computer Usage 4,579 26,217 3,951 28,978 Holds (Total) 6,705 38,498 7,019 49,091 *Breakout of Kent County Residential Statistics Circulation Registrations Harrington: 313 Harrington: 2 Smyrna: 1,384 Smyrna: 30 Milford: 134 Milford: 0 Outside City Limits: 14,518 Outside City Limits: 155 Total Registered Users: (Card Holders) City: 19,932 Kent County: 13,152 Outside Kent County: 958 Other Points of Interest: Inter/Interlibrary***: 73 items loaned out Technical services: 1,258 items added 47 items borrowed 234 items deleted Volunteers: 285.5 hours of service completed City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013 7

PUBLIC WORKS Administration Administrative review and inspection services continued on all residential and commercial developments. The following residential subdivisions are in various phases of construction: Oak Shadows Emerald Pointe Lexington Glenn Village of Westover (Phase VI) Farthing Woods Eden Hill (Residential) Patriot Village Clearview Meadows Village of Cannon Mill Sanitation Monthly Total Refuse (Tons) Sanitation Hours 1,500 1200 940 928 1000 1,000 826 826 864 862 762 769 790 788 764 810 800 713 710 663 598 560 600 500 400 302 254 162 148 143 155 150 131 141 108 118 131 123 130 99 200 42 49 - 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Bulk Collection Mechanized Hand Trash Container 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 Collection Collection Repair/Delivery Bulk Automated Jan 13 Jan 12 JANUARY 13 FYTD 13 JANUARY 12 FYTD 12 Trips to DSWA Sandtown Landfill 184 1,206 179 1,265 Total Tonnage to DSWA 939.89 6,678.58 912.57 7,217.04 90-Gallon Containers Delivered 29 184 18 136 300-Gallon Containers Delivered 7 23 5 23 Total Man Hours-containers Delivered 42 295 49 133 CURBSIDE RECYCLING TOTAL # OF TOTAL # OF STATS HOUSEHOLDS ACCOUNTS WEIGHT/LBS. AVE. LBS. COLLECTED January 2013 20,239 8,683 289,860 14.26 8 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013

PUBLIC WORKS continued Streets JANAURY 13 FYTD 13 JANUARY 12 FYTD 12 Signed Installed 24 179 60 141 Signs Repaired 0 64 24 123 Curbs Painted Yellow (feet) 12 5,527 0 942 New Post Installed 0 29 7 46 Storm Catch Basins Repaired 0 1 1 27 Storm Catch Basin Repairing (Hrs.) 0 1 1 11 Storm Catch Basins Cleaned 1,317 1,761 1,631 1,835 Storm Catch Basins Cleaning (Hrs.) 316 626 448 697 Hot Mix Patching (Tons) 0 236 0 63 Hot Mix Patching (Hrs.) 0 283 0 420 Cold Mix Patching Hrs.) 64 345 32 261 Concrete Work (Hrs) 0 435 0 544 Concrete Patching (Cubic Yards) 0 4 0 1 Street and Alley Maintenance (Hrs) 168 1,184 168 1,184 Ditch Work (Hrs). 0 102 0 64 Street Sweeping (Miles) 672 4,895 1,234 5,555 Street Sweeping (Cubic Yards) 212 1,302 342 1,352 Leaves Collected (Cubic Yards) 368 14,455 475 14,674 Leaf Collection (Miles) 825 5,593 976 5,182 Grounds Arborist Crew JANUARY 2013 JANUARY 2012 Trees Trimmed 47 41 Trees Removed 13 24  Completed cutting back the alleys in Sherwood.  Removed a large fallen tree in the ditch at Mallard Pond.  Assisted with removing three floating trees on Silver Lake and Mirror Lake.  Removed a large fallen tree in the Puncheon Run stream.  Turned in a group at stumps to “Miss Utility” to be ground out. Beautification Crew  Completed the cleaning of the entire inside of the greenhouse in preparation for spring planting.  Began sowing annual/perennial seeds in the flats.  Flagged traffic when removing floating Christmas trees from Silver and Mirror Lakes.  Attended the Horticulture/Pesticide Conference to get CEU’s and viewed some presentations on new plants, con- tainer gardening and underutilized evergreen and deciduous tree species. Mowing Crew  Removed leaves from the Crossgates Park.  Snow and ice removal from 4 miles of sidewalks and jogging trails after a couple of light snowfalls.  Assisted with the collection and chipping of approximately 1,400 Christmas trees at residential locations. City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013 9

PUBLIC WORKS continued Geographic Information Systems (GIS)  Created large street map for the Dover Post Office.  Printed Voter District maps for the City Clerk’s Office.  Printed 2013 Packet Calendar for City Clerk’s Office.  Printed various documents for the Finance Director to present during the Council meeting.  Modify proposed alley abandonment map for 20 Carver Road.  Printed snow quadrant maps.  Created contracted grass area tables.  Created map showing property owners around The Green. Fleet and Facilities Management Fleet Maintenance Work Orders: 58 Major Program Updates Measure January 2013 January 2012 DIFFERENCE *10 out of 23 43.48% 6 Unscheduled PM’s Scheduled Preventative Maintenance appoint- 6 out of 32 19 No room in shop For + 24.73 % ments being kept (Quantity and Percentage) 18.75% PM, due to breakdowns Moved to February PM Schedule Facilities Management Routine work orders completed within 5 days 26 out of 27 30 out of 32 + 2.55 % (Quantity and Percentage) 96.30% % Emergency work orders completed within 2 days 4 out of 4 11 out of 11 0% (Quantity and Percentage) 100% 100 % 10 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013

PUBLIC WORKS continued Water/Wastewater Water Production/Billed Consumption/Flow to Kent County 255,000,000 205,000,000 155,000,000 105,000,000 55,000,000 5,000,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 Total Water Prod. Billed Consumpt. ENGINEERING SUMMARY Major Program Updates JANUARY 2013 JANUARY 2012 DIFF FY13 YTD FY12 State and Federal Violations 0 violations 0 violations - - - Water Quality Complaints 3 1 +2 41 65 Plan Review Completed Within 30 days 11 plan 6 plan 49 +5 47 of Submission 100% 100% Field Inspection Response within 48 10 29 -19 186 186 hours of Request OPERATIONAL SUMMARY Task JANUARY 13 JANUARY 12 CURRENT FY Water Production - Daily Average 3,662,581 3,731,806 112,354,000 Average Field Response Time (goal is <30 minutes) 22.24 16.6 20.07 Water Mains Repaired 0 3 21 Water Service Lines Repaired 2 1 15 Wastewater Mains Repaired 0 0 3 Wastewater Service Lines Repaired 0 0 3 Sewer Lines Flushed - linear feet 72,804 79,512 541,918 Sewer Mains Videoed -linear feet 8,553 365 41,226 Total Fire Hydrants in Service 1,802 1,781 1,802 Total Water Meters in City Distribution System 14,089 13,999 14,089 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013 11

PUBLIC UTILITIES Electric System Peak Total System Load 171.1 200 100,000 81,930 158.5 153.4 77,547 143.7 66,593 62,510 140 80,000 60,425 60,085 61,952 118.4 57,915 111.22 56,336 55,973 150 55,238 54,951 55,553 106.13 109.3 102.9 99.6 94.5 99.2 60,000 100 40,000 50 20,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 Outages Customers of Gained/Lost 35 6,000 100 88 25 80 Customers 4,000 Outages 60 54 15 2,000 40 26 5 10 6 13 15 20 5 9 2 2 2 2 -5 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan 0 0 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Outages 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 Outages: 2 Customers: 10 Electric Monthly Outage Report The annual outage goal will be less than 295 Controllable Outages Average Response Time minutes per customer, which is a Delaware Annual goal is less than 40 Goal is less than 30 minutes Standard. This will be measured by calculating the System Average Interruption Duration Index. Month Year-to-date Month Year-to-date FY 13 YTD FY 12 FY 11 1 21 31.0 Minutes 27.72 Minutes 51.08 39.44 63.78 JAN 13 JAN 12 FY13 YTD PROGRAM UPDATES Tree Trimming 211 96 1589 Number of Oil Releases 0 0 0 Lost Time Accidents – All Electric Utility Divisions 0 0 2 New Services 15 10 181 Major Goals Completed in the Past Two Months *Extended Fiber infrastructure to Woodbrook Professional Center.* 12 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2013

City Planner’s Monthly Report Planning, Inspections & Recreation January 2013 Planning, Inspections & Recreation Highlights  High Attendance at the Pitts Center—In January, the John W. Pitts Center saw its highest monthly total program attendance at (13,104) since opening in 2008!  Early Morning Gym Hours a Success—Increased hours at the Pitts Center for early morning walkers and joggers without increasing our budget. By flexing staff schedules, we began opening the Pitts Center at 6:30 am. In the month of January, this early morning opening hosted 46 patrons on the indoor walking track.  National Monument Project—The Planning Office spent much of January working with other City departments and the National Park Service to put the documentation together for The Green to be included in the proposed National Monument site for Delaware.  Bicycle/Pedestrian Subcommittee -The Planning Office held a workshop for members of the public interested in learning more about the creation of the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Subcommittee. Over 30 members of the public attended and others submitted interest by e-mail.  Vacant Buildings—During the month of January staff registered 41 additional structures as vacant buildings for a total of 352 active registrations, and the City also collected $5,750 in Vacant Building Registration Fees.  Construction Permits—Building permits were issued for rebuilding Serenity Place and for renovations at Old Navy at the Dover Mall. Personnel and Training Updates On January 16, 2013 Ann Marie Townshend, Janelle Cornwell, and Dawn Melson-Williams attended the Audio Web-Conference Zoning for Small Business held at the Dover Public Library Meeting Room. On January 25, 2013 Maretta Purnell, Kathleen Still, Dean Holden, Ronald, and Fred Tolbert attended the Delaware Planning Education Program (Planning 101) Workshop held at the University of Delaware Paradee Center in Dover, Delaware.

Planning, Inspections & Recreation Revenue FY '13 Budget FY '13 Actual (YTD) Revenue Stream Looking Forward…. Business License $1,455,000 $ 1,440,784 99% Trailer License $23,000 $ 21,039 91% The following activities are planned Building Permits $400,000 $ 163,939 41% for February and will be reported in Cert. of Occupancy $9,000 $ 4,220 47% the February Monthly Report: Public Occupancy $9,000 $ 8,084 90%  Pitts Goes Red! Lodging House $12,000 $ 14,643 122%  Work on Vacant Building and Plumbing/Heating/Air $70,000 $ 47,644 68% Crime Free Housing Ordinances Sprinkler $25,000 $ 13,154 53%  Continued coordination with Rental Inspection Fee $325,000 $ 279,120 86% DelDOT, Dover/Kent MPO, and Miscellaneous $25,000 $ 10,637 43% Capital School District regarding Fire Protection Fees $30,300 $ 21,155 70% safe pedestrian access to the new Vacant Building Reg. $15,000 $ 33,250 222% Dover High School Total P&I Revenue $2,398,300 $ 2,057,668 86% Recreation $130,000 $69,202 53% PLANNING OFFICE The Planning Office is part of the review process for certain types of construction activity permits (Building Permits, Sign Permits, etc.) and Certificate of Occupancy permits. For January 2013, Planning Staff was involved with review of 48 Permits and 4 Certificates of Occupancy permits (2013 Year to Date total of 52 Permits and COs compared to 61 year-to-date in 2012). Planning Staff also reviews new applications for Business Licenses and Rental Dwelling Permits. The Green – Proposal as a National Monument The Planning Office conducted a Public Workshop on January 23, 2013 for the adjacent property owners in regards to consideration of The Green as a National Monument and the associated Preservation & Conservation Easement. There were 15 attendees at the Workshop. Planning Staff also began work on preparing the Baseline Documentation for The Green. Comprehensive Plan Implementation Planning Staff continues to focus on the various implementation items identified in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as amended.  The text amendment and Zoning Map amendment to update the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ) as a result of the recent AICUZ Study for Dover Air Force Base began the formal review

process with a presentation at the January 14th Legislative Finance and Administration Committee Meeting. The amendments will be considered by the Planning Commission in February before final hearings by City Council in March. nd  On January 22 , the Planning Office a Public Workshop to gather interest in the Bicycle & Pedestrian Sub-Committee that will be formed. There were 30 attendees at the Workshop. Staff is seeking more detailed information from those attendees expressing interest in serving on the Sub-Committee in order to select a balanced committee.  Other on-going efforts of the Planning Office include participating in planning for the Capital City Trail, participating in the planning and development design of Garrison Oak Technical Park, and research for future ordinance amendments related to the commercial zoning classifications. New Dover High School Project (C-10-05/S-11-18) Construction activities related to site improvements and the building construction activities continue at the new Dover High School project site. The applicant continues to work on the design for the east entrance. The safety concerns for pedestrian and vehicular traffic at the High School were an agenda item at the January 30th Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting. As directed, the Planning Staff will continue to work the Capital School District to gather information on the walking student population, sidewalk availability, etc. The construction continues on the signalized west entrance (Dover High Drive) and Route 8 improvements. Stormwater Compliance With the assistance of Wesley College, staff worked on completing the annual report on our permit activities for 2012 to submit to DNREC in February. Additionally, a handout was distributed to businesses regarding maintenance of stormwater management facilities. BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTIVITY Board of Adjustment The Board of Adjustment met on January 16, 2013. The next regular scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment is scheduled for February 20, 2013.  V-13-01 Variances at 127 South DuPont Hwy – Approved variances for application V-13-01 with the condition that the front setback be located within 20ft of the right-of-way on South DuPont Highway which allows for the movement of the tanks and the canopy six (6) feet from the rear property line based on the testimony given and the conditions of the comments made in the Staff Report.  V-12-15 Variances at 35 Loockerman Plaza – Approved variance for application V-12-15 based upon testimony given by Counsel and Engineering Principal and is provided in the staff recommendations for approval in the Staff Report. Approval is granted finding that the building as constructed will continue to be consistent with the surrounding area (Downtown environment and the Historic Zone) and the encroachment will be minimum in nature and visually almost non-existent. Historic District Commission The Historic District Commission met on January 17, 2013. The next Historic District Commission meeting is scheduled for February 21, 2013.  HI-12-06 Demolition of Building at 509 South State Street – Received an update on project and then took action to re-table the application for building demolition at 509 South State Street in order to comply

with the previous meeting’s decision seeking additional information in order to render a decision. Planning Commission The Planning Commission met on January 22, 2013 and took the actions summarized listed below. The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for February 19, 2013.  SB-13-01 Lands of 1151-1155 Walker Rd, LLC: Parcel Subdivision – Conditional approval of the application SB-13-01 for subdivision into two lots and recommendation of approval of the waiver request to allow lot within frontage on a public street based on the applicant’s acceptance of the DAC recommendations.  S-13-01 7-Eleven at 127 S DuPont Highway: Construction of Retail Store with Gas Pumps— Conditional approval of Site Plan application S-13-01 and the waiver requests reduction of arterial street buffer and Tree Mitigation Plan as long as all DAC requirements and recommendations are met. Dangerous Building/Demolition Status The following buildings were declared dangerous by City Council:  488 North East Avenue – An asbestos survey has been completed and abatement is being scheduled.  39 Primrose Drive – Demolition should proceed in February.  126 N. Ann Avenue – Permits were issued for renovations to the property.  212 N. Governors Avenue – Sunnyfield Contracting demolished the structure and garage.  209 N New Street – Chase Bank has requested additional time, and staff has worked to contact the property owner.  628 N West Street – Progress has been made by the owner in removing clutter, trash and debris from the interior of the property. Exterior improvements are Code Enforcement Activity still required. Case Type # cases cur‐ # cases % staff ini ‐ % staff ini ‐  312/314 W Division St – rent month YTD ated current ated YTD There has been no activity, month and staff expects to initiate No valid rental permit 6 6 83% 83% the demolition process No valid building permit 7 7 71% 71% shortly after the February Tall grass and weeds 1 1 100% 100% 13, 2013 deadline set by Unregistered vehicle 5 5 80% 80% City Council. Abandoned vehicle 21 21 95% 95%  316 & 320 W Division St – Annual Housing Inspec on 40 40 93% 93% Progress has been made to Property Maintenance – 67 67 73% 73% repair the properties. Staff Exterior will continue to monitor the condition of the Electric Termina on 3 3 100% 100% properties. Dover Code of Ordinances 57 57 86% 86% Zoning 10 10 80% 80% Total Cases 217 217 Total # of Inspec ons For Month 344

Fire Marshal’s Office, Building Inspections & Licensing Summary LIFE SAFETY Inspec ons Jan 13 FYTD 13 JAN 12 FYTD 12 Fire Protec on Inspec ons (new & ex‐ is ng) 15 127 15 351 Fire Code Inspec ons 25 74 20 296 Inspec on Deficiencies 5 66 5 368 Cer ficate of Occupancy 9 36 5 19 Accidental $4000.00 $6450.00 $80,000.00 $205,010.00 Incendiary $1000 $1100.00 $0 $59,500.00 Undetermined $300 $0 $0 $20,000.00 PERMITTING AND LICENSING Permits Issued JAN 12 FYTD 13 JAN 12 FYTD 12 Administra ve Permit 3 17 1 13 Building Addi on/Renova on Permits 27 176 34 221 Building Permits 2 80 7 101 Demoli on Permits 4 27 3 12 Fence Permits 4 49 11 64 Fire Preven on Permits 12 62 9 46 Mechanical Permits 22 192 14 164 Plumbing Permits 26 204 36 252 Sign Permits 21 144 27 161 Swimming Pool Permits 0 10 0 6 Business Licenses 33 962 36 1,340 Merchant Licenses 8 256 3 265 Contractor Licenses 22 640 31 705 Lodging House Licenses 18 49 3 8 Mobile Homes 17 217 24 297 Public Occupancy 113 298 34 78 Rental Dwelling 1614 2522 389 487 BUILDING INSPECTIONS JAN 13 FYTD 13 JAN 12 FYTD 12 Building 437 1,973 260 2,089 Plumbing/Mechanical 364 2,149 325 2,455 Cer ficate of Occupancy 4 60 4 67

John W. Pitts Center Usage Total Program Attendance Facility Usage By The Hour 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Feb 12 May 12 June 12 Oct 12 Jan 12 Apr 12 Aug 12 Sept 12 Nov 12 Dec 12 Jan 13 Mar 12 July 12 Program Attendance** JANUARY 13 FYTD 13 JANUARY 12 FYTD 12 Total 13,104 30,310 12,189 29,163 Open Gym 1,045 5,465 795 4,503 Fitness Classes 394 2,169 212 2,038 Leagues 9,702 16, 877 9,060 16,505 Camps 0 254 0 348 Sports Classes 201 908 278 1,038 Meetings & Rentals 1,762 4,555 1,838 4,602 Enrichment Classes 0 82 6 129 Facility Usage By The Hour JANUARY 13 FYTD 13 JANUARY 12 FYTD 12 Open Gym 415 3,199.25 314.75 3,048.5 Fitness Classes 52.5 304.5 32 288 Leagues 241 458 149.5 365.5 Camps 0 49 0 44 Sports Classes 23 113 19.5 135 Meetings & Rentals 39 192.5 80.75 233.75 Enrichment Classes 0 41.5 6 60 Total Facility Usage Hours 770.5 4,357.75 602.5 4,174.75 We are issuing FREE Recreation Center ID Cards to track facility usage during Public Open Gym Periods. The statistics listed below reflect those that have completed the registration. Open Gym Registrations: Total ID cards issued: 5,466 City Residents: 2,419 (44%) Non-City Residents: 3,047 (56%) Kent County Residents: 2,526 (46%) Sussex County Residents: 185 (3%) New Castle County Residents: 110 (2%) Out of State Residents: 226 (4%)

Date Range: From 01/01/2013 to 01/31/2013 Incident Type Report (Summary) Dover Fire Department Count Pct of Total Est Total Est Incident Type Incidents Loss Loss 1 Fire 111 Building fire 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 113 Cooking fire, confined to container 12 13.48% $0 0.00% 118 Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 150 Outside rubbish fire, other 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 151 Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 1 1.12% $0 0.00% Totals 17 19.10% $0 0.00% 2 Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat(no fire) Totals 0 0.00% $0 0.00% 3 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident 322 Motor vehicle accident with injuries 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 352 Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 2 2.25% $0 0.00% Totals 4 4.49% $0 0.00% 4 Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 412 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 3 3.37% $0 0.00% 413 Oil or other combustible liquid spill 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 440 Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 3 3.37% $0 0.00% 442 Overheated motor 3 3.37% $0 0.00% 445 Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 451 Biological hazard, confirmed or suspected 1 1.12% $0 0.00% Totals 14 15.73% $0 0.00% 5 Service Call 500 Service Call, other 3 3.37% $0 0.00% 511 Lock-out 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 520 Water problem, other 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 521 Water evacuation 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 522 Water or steam leak 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 531 Smoke or odor removal 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 550 Public service assistance, other 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 553 Public service 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 554 Assist invalid 1 1.12% $0 0.00% Totals 12 13.48% $0 0.00% 6 Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, other 4 4.49% $0 0.00% 611 Dispatched & canceled en route 6 6.74% $0 0.00% 622 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 652 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 1 1.12% $0 0.00% Totals 14 15.73% $0 0.00% 7 False Alarm & False Call 700 False alarm or false call, other 9 10.11% $0 0.00% 710 Malicious, mischievous false call, other 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 730 System malfunction, other 2 2.25% $0 0.00% 733 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 3 3.37% $0 0.00% 740 Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 1 1.12% $0 0.00% Date: 03/04/2013 Page: 1

Date Range: From 01/01/2013 to 01/31/2013 Incident Type Report (Summary) Dover Fire Department Count Pct of Total Est Total Est Incident Type Incidents Loss Loss 741 Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 742 Extinguishing system activation 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 1 1.12% $0 0.00% 744 Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 3 3.37% $0 0.00% 745 Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 6 6.74% $0 0.00% Totals 28 31.46% $0 0.00% 8 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster Totals 0 0.00% $0 0.00% 9 Special Incident Type Totals 0 0.00% $0 0.00% Totals 89 $0 Date: 03/04/2013 Page: 2

Date Range: From 01/01/2013 to 01/31/2013 Manpower Hours by Sitation Found Dover Fire Department Num ber of Hours by Situation Found Rescue & Emergency Medica Sum of # Attending X Incident Length Overpressure Rupture, Exp 165 Fire 0 Overpressure Rupture, Exp 120 Rescue & Emergency Medica 119 Hazardous Condition (No F Fire 39 Service Call 23 Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition (No F 341 False Alarm & False Call 0 Severe Weather & Natural 0 Special Incident Type Severe Weather & Natural Special Incident Type Service Call Good Intent Call False Alarm & False Call Date: 03/04/2013 Page: 1

Date Range: From 01/01/2013 to 01/31/2013 Alarms by Month of Year Dover Fire Department 95 89 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Jan-2013 Date: 03/04/2013 Page: 1

Date Range: From 01/01/2013 to 01/31/2013 Incident Run Log Company: All Companies Dover Fire Department Sorted by: Incident Number Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type 01/01/2013 30046 2013-000001 04:00 127 SAXTON RD Building fire On 01/01/13 at 0356 hrs, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched to 127 Saxton Rd for a working house fire. L1, under the direction of Deputy Chief M. Carey, arrived on scene to find a one-story, single family dwelling, with fire showing from the roof. L1 secured a hydrant and advanced a 1-3/4 attack line for an aggressive interior attack. E7 arrived on scene and provided the truck company functions. E2 arrived on scene and preformed the primary and secondary searches which proved negative. E41-1 provided the RIT.E6 assisted with overhaul. The scene is being investigated by the State Fire Marshal’s office. 01/01/2013 30046 2013-000002 15:21 255 WEBBS LN C Cooking fire, confined to container Ladder 1 A reported light smoke coming from apartment 32C. Maintenance was on scene but left. I approved forcible entry into apartment 32C. No one was home at the time. Ladder ones crew found a pot on the stove burning. Ladder 1 did positive ventilation to the apartment complex. Turned over to building maintenance. 01/01/2013 30046 2013-000003 15:58 820 CARVEL DR H Smoke detector activation due to malfunction Ladder 1 A reporting smoke detector activation of Z2SD5 entryway of laundry room. crew investigated with nothing found. Ladder 1 returned with alarm still sounding waiting on maintenance to reset. 01/01/2013 30046 2013-000004 20:57 123 REESE ST Outside rubbish fire, other resident was burning his Christmas tree. I advised him of the proper way to burn in the city limits. The resident put the fire out before we arrived on scene. 01/02/2013 30046 2013-000005 18:48 1137 S STATE ST Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional On arrival found a pull station activated after being struck by a basketball in the Gym. Maintenance was reseting alarm on arrival. Dover 17 Cleared. 01/03/2013 30046 2013-000006 09:48 1030 FORREST AVE 109 Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other Crews found and electrical circuit box shorting out. Power was secured to the box and units cleared. The scene was turned over to FM4 01/03/2013 30046 2013-000007 19:48 123 N DUPONT HWY Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other Crews found a small work station on fire, that was put out prior to our arrival. Crews secured the work station and checked for extension, The scene was turned over to Fm1. 01/04/2013 30046 2013-000008 10:27 RIDGELY AND FULTON STREETS Good intent call, other REPORTED A BOX TRUCK WITH INSULATION WAS SMOKING. ONE CALL. ON ARRIVAL VEHICLE HAD LEFT AREA. NO SERVICES NEEDED. 01/04/2013 30046 2013-000009 18:39 225 S STATE ST False alarm or false call, other Investigated incident. Units 224 and 225 are connected within the fire alarm. Occupant in 224 pulled the pull station inside the front door to see if it work. Incident was placed under fire watch untill owner could come and reset alarm. 01/05/2013 30046 2013-000010 02:08 414 E WIND DR Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other L1, E7, E2 RESPONDED FOR AN ODOR OF SMOKE IN THE RESIDENCE. THEY ARRIVED AND INVESTIGATED AND IT COULD NOT BE DETERMINED WHAT THE SMELL WAS OR WHERE IT WAS COMING FROM . HOMEOWNER ADVISED TO KEEP AND EYE ON THINGS AND CALL BACK IF NECESSARY. 01/05/2013 30046 2013-000011 21:30 50 GLENN STREET Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) Crews responded for report of a smell of gas around the above area. Crews arrived and Chief West assumed command. Crews checked the surrounding streets and found it to swamp gas causing the smell. Scene was placed under control . 01/06/2013 30046 2013-000012 02:47 522 GREENHILL RD Smoke or odor removal On arrival found a skunk odor in the house mistaken for gas. Residence checked with negative results. 01/06/2013 30046 2013-000013 19:03 WEBBS LANE Malicious, mischievous false call, other On arrival found a pull station activated inside the front door of Building D. Crews checked the building with negative results. 01/06/2013 30046 2013-000014 19:08 640 S STATE ST Oil or other combustible liquid spill Responded to the above location for a report of a diesel spill on the 3rd floor. While en route dispatch advised that denrec would be making a response as well. Arrived on location along with 54 units and all crews did a walk through of the building to find some fuel had leaked to the second floor. Management from KGH advised 18 that there was no need for denrec they were going to contact serv-pro. Scene was placed under control and turned over to Management and FM1. 01/07/2013 30046 2013-000015 15:50 335 CRICKLE CREEK LN Good intent call, other Homeowner states that she smelled gas coming from her fireplace. Upon arrival homeowner had turned off gas to fire place. I was unable to get a reading and asked her to turn it back on. I still was not able to get a reading. I adviced her that I was not getting a reading and that if she felt unsafe to turn it off and call chesapeake utilities to come and check it out. 01/07/2013 30046 2013-000016 20:30 319 BILLY MITCHELL LN Trash or rubbish fire, contained L1 RESPONDED TO APT D304 FOR REPORT OF SMOKE IN THE RESIDENCE. IT WAS FOUND THAT THE RESIDENT DISCARDED ASHES FROM A CIGARETTE INTO HER TRASH CAN INSIDE THE APARTMENT. SHE EXTINGUISHED SAME PRIOR TO FD ARRIVAL. 01/08/2013 30046 2013-000017 07:16 103 PAR HAVEN DR K Cooking fire, confined to container Writer completed a walk through of the building and found smoke detector 1 activated on the first floor. Occupents advised writer that the occupent of apartment 12 burned food and left the area. FM 2 was notified and writer cleared. 01/09/2013 30046 2013-000018 16:10 S STATE ST & S DUPONT HWY Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle Upon arrival pts did not need to be extricated. Crews of R1 and E7 assisted with medical care, and placed oil dry on the road. B-41 transported 1 to KGH ER and A-41 transported 2, including a minor to KGH ER. 01/09/2013 30046 2013-000019 18:45 538 BAY RD Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional On arrival fire alarm was reset prior to FD arrival. Crews walked through the building with negative results. Date: 03/04/2013 Page: 1 Time:11:24

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type 01/10/2013 30046 2013-000020 08:49 1012 S GOVERNORS AVE Public service 18 RESPONDED TO ABOVE FOR REPORT OF A SMALL CHILD CALLING 911 SEVERAL TIMES STATING THERE WAS A FIRE. DOVER PD ARRIVED AND FOUND A 3 YEAR FEMALE IN POSSESSION OF A 911 PHONE MAKING THE CALLS. THE PHONE WAS SECURED AND SCENE WAS TURNED OVER TO DOVER PD. 01/10/2013 30046 2013-000021 13:49 383 N DUPONT HWY Biological hazard, confirmed or suspected 18 RESPONDED TO ABOVE FOR REPORT OF A BIOLOGICAL HAZARD. WRITER ARRIVED AND FOUND TWO BOXES CONTAINING MEDICAL SUPPLIES. ALL WAS TAKEN INTO FD CUSTODY AND TURNED OVER TO DOVER PD EVIDENCE FOR DESTRUCTION. 01/10/2013 30046 2013-000022 15:07 51 WEBBS LN H Cooking fire, confined to container L1 RESPONDED TO ABOVE FOR REPORT OF ALARM SOUNDING. CREWS INVESTIGATED AND FOUND UNATTENDED COOKING IN APT 309. SCENE WAS PLACED UNDER CONTROL. 01/10/2013 30046 2013-000023 16:47 119 LINDEN CT Cooking fire, confined to container L1, E7 responded to above for report of smoke detector activation. L1 arrived and Chief West assumed command. L1s crews investigated and found the smoke from the stove while cooking set the detector off. Placed under control . 01/11/2013 30046 2013-000024 21:18 51 WEBBS LN D False alarm or false call, other WRITER COMPLETED A WALK THROUGH OF THE BUILDING WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THE ALARM WAS RESET PRIOR TO OUR ARRIVAL BY ADVANTEC. DISPATCH WAS ADVISED THE ALARM WAS SOUNDING FOR APPROX. TWO HOURS BEFORE THEY CALLED. 01/12/2013 30046 2013-000025 09:39 425 BEUVALE LN Smoke scare, odor of smoke Crews found a small fan on the second floor with a motor burned up. There was no extension or need for positive pressure. 01/12/2013 30046 2013-000026 10:04 36 THE GREEN Dispatched & canceled en route Recieved a call for structure fire from kent center. While on the call disptached recieved a call from the owner advising she burned a pot and everything was fine. Writer cancelled the response. 01/12/2013 30046 2013-000027 12:28 FORREST AVE Motor vehicle accident with injuries Motor Vehicle Collision in the intersection. One SUV on its side with one patient removed from vehicle. Vehicles roof was removed and patient extricated. BLS injuries. 01/12/2013 30046 2013-000028 20:27 400 COUNTRY DR Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) Upon arrival Ladder 1 crew found nothing evident of a gas leak. 01/13/2013 30046 2013-000029 05:55 1358 FORREST AVE Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill Upon arrival found about 15 to 20 gallons of fuel in the gas station. Eng 2 driver and myself applied oil dry. 01/13/2013 30046 2013-000030 19:55 1910 WHITEOAK RD Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle Units dispatched to a report of a downed aircraft in the area of Bayside Dr and Rt 9. After searching for approx 90 mins, the downed aircraft a single engine Piper type airplane was located in a strip of trees off of Whiteoak Rd in the area of SR1. The downed aircraft had a single male pilot that was deceased and a DOPA was granted to ALS on scene. Medical examiner arrived and began investigation until arrival of FAA. FAA and NTSB units arrived on scene and assumed command of scene. Dover Fire units remained on scene to extricate remains after the OK from Medical examiner and FAA. 01/15/2013 30046 2013-000031 03:39 144 KINGS CLIFF Assist invalid ASSISTED 63 WITH LIFTING PATIENT FROM FLOOR BACK INTO WHEELCHAIR. 01/15/2013 30046 2013-000032 10:43 211 DELAWARE AVE Public service assistance, other Stand-by at station 1 for Jack Markell inauguration. 01/15/2013 30046 2013-000033 11:12 303 DOVEVIEW DR System malfunction, other Ladders 1 crew investigated and found alarm panel saying a phone line connection failure. FM 1 on location as well placed building on fire watch till the problem has been fixed. 01/15/2013 30046 2013-000034 23:43 303 DOVEVIEW DR Water or steam leak WRITER RESPONDED TO ABOVE FOR REPORT OF ALARM SOUNDING IN BUILDING 300 . UPON ARRIVAL WRITER CHECKED THE PANEL AND NOTICED A WATERFLOW ACTIVATION. NO LEAKS WERE PRESENT IN BUILDING 300 OR 400. THE PUMPHOUSE WAS ACTIVATED AND RUNNING HOWEVER. FORCIBLE ENTRY WAS MADE TO THE PUMP HOUSE DUE TO MAINTENANCE NOT HAVING A KEY TO THE BUILDING. ONCE INSIDE WRITER LOCATED THE MAIN FIRE PUMP RUNNING AND LEAKING WATER OUT OF SAME. ALARMS WERE SILENCED AND THE SCENE WAS TURNED OVER TO BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND THE ALARM COMPANY WAS ALSO SENDING A REPRESENTATIVE TO WORK ON SAME. 01/16/2013 30046 2013-000035 08:07 35 COMMERNCE WAY SUITE False alarm or false call, other Crews found a pull station knocked off the wall by a fork lift. The walk through of the building was negative and units cleared. 01/16/2013 30046 2013-000036 10:22 1131 BAY ROAD LOT 144 Service Call, other Assist B-63 put patient back into bed...... 01/17/2013 30046 2013-000037 14:14 750 HOLLY DR Overheated motor On arrival found smoke in the basement coming from the rear of the dryer. Crews investigated and found a water pump from the washer to the sewer line had burned up. power secured to same all units cleared. 01/17/2013 30046 2013-000038 15:57 500 PERSIMMON TREE LA 2 Dispatched & canceled en route Maintenance called and stated people were smoking in the hallway and set off the detector. Maintenance was instructed to reset the fire alarm by FD. 01/18/2013 30046 2013-000039 01:33 992 WHATCOAT DR Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill Responded to the above location for gas leaking from a vehicle as the result of shots fired into the vehicle. Crew from Engine 3 used stay dry and scene was placed under control and returned. 01/18/2013 30046 2013-000040 13:30 1567 MCKEE RD Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional Date: 03/04/2013 Page: 2 Time:11:24

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type CONSTRUCTION WORKERS SET ALARM OFF. BUILDING HAS BEEN PLACED ON FIRE WATCH AND TO ADVISE DISPATCH WHEN WORK IS DONE. 01/19/2013 30046 2013-000041 10:28 411 S QUEEN ST Smoke or odor removal Apartment 102 unattended cooking...occupant of 102 had a medical issue A-63 was called by Dover Police....Dover Police also forced entry into apartment... 01/19/2013 30046 2013-000042 18:55 365 N DUPONT HWY Extinguishing system activation RESPONDED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS FOR A REPORT OF A GENERAL FIRE ALARM ACTIVATION. AN INVESTIGATION FOUND THE ANSUL SYSTEM IN THE KITCHEN WAS ACTIVATED FOR UNKNOWN REASONS. FM-1 RESPONDED AND ASSISTANCE WAS REQUEST FROM THE DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH. THE FACILITY WAS EVACUATED. 01/19/2013 30046 2013-000043 21:15 365 N DUPONT HWY Unintentional transmission of alarm, other RESPONDED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS FOR A REPORT OF AN AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM. AN INVESTIGATION FOUND A TECHNICIAN WAS WORKING ON THE SYSTEM AS A RESULT OF THE PREVIOUS ANSUL SYSTEM ACTIVATION. NO NOTIFICATION WAS MADE OF THE TEST. 01/20/2013 30046 2013-000044 10:33 950 WHATCOAT DR False alarm or false call, other Writer responded to above for report of fire alarm sounding. Writer arrived and found no such activation. 01/20/2013 30046 2013-000045 17:44 1300 Farmview dr. Cooking fire, confined to container Unattended cooking in Apt F 01/20/2013 30046 2013-000046 19:09 864 S STATE ST Detector activation, no fire - unintentional BASEMENT SMOKE DETECTOR ACTIVATION. UPON INVESTAGATING FOUND NOTHING. 01/20/2013 30046 2013-000047 20:56 868 S STATE ST Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional pull station actativation. scene turned over to occupant 01/21/2013 30046 2013-000048 17:39 255 WEBBS LN E Service Call, other VEHICLE LEAKING GAS. CREW FROM BRUSH 9 PUT DOWN STAY DRY TO CONTROL THE LEAK. 01/21/2013 30046 2013-000049 19:13 1001 N DUPONT HWY 13 Overheated motor On arrival manager advised that the fire alarm had activated for a duct detector and their was smoke coming fro the duct work inthe front fo the store. Crews investigated same and found a HVAC unit on the roof had malfunctioned. Power was secured to same and units cleared. Building turned over to maintenance. 01/22/2013 30046 2013-000050 14:11 1119 FORREST AVE Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional On arrival FM1 was on location with an alarm company perfroming a system test. DOver 17 cleared. 01/22/2013 30046 2013-000051 17:03 105 N AMERICAN AVE Good intent call, other E6, L1 responded to above for report of vapor coming from a chimney in the area. Crews investigated and found it was a heater pipe hooked to the chimney stack causing same. Was placed under control. 01/22/2013 30046 2013-000052 21:45 41 S GOVERNORS AVE Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire RESPONDED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS FOR A REPORT OF A TRASH CAN ON FIRE WITH EXPOSURE TO A HOUSE. UPON ARRIVAL, UNITS FOUND A COD TRASH CAN MOSTLY EXTINGUISHED WITH DAMAGE TO PORCH LATTICEWORK. FM-2 WAS CALLED. 01/23/2013 30046 2013-000053 00:29 1300 S FARMVIEW DR F False alarm or false call, other Crews completed a walk through of the building with negative results. Maintenance was notified and units cleared with the alarm still sounding. 01/23/2013 30046 2013-000054 05:04 1300 S FARMVIEW DR F Dispatched & canceled en route Writer was notified of a walk in complaint at Dover Police that the alarm was still sounding from the prior False Alarm. Writer had dispatch contact maintenance to have him respond. FM was notified to respond during their normal business hours. 01/23/2013 30046 2013-000055 08:31 15 WATERFALL DR False alarm or false call, other Crews found a smoke detector sounding in a vacant home. Crews gained access through an unlocked garage door and completed a walk through with negative results. The property owner was notified through dispatch and units cleared. 01/23/2013 30046 2013-000056 16:57 1300 S FARMVIEW DR F Cooking fire, confined to container The alarm was reset prior to our arrival by maintenance . Crews completed a walk through of the building and found unattended cooking in room F-1. Crews provided positive pressure and cleared. 01/23/2013 30046 2013-000057 17:14 1300 S FARMVIEW DR F Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) While on scene of a cooking fire, crews discovered a gas leak at the main going into the building. Writier requested Chesapeke Utilities and had all units clear. The scene was turned over to FM2. 01/23/2013 30046 2013-000058 23:45 1300 S FARMVIEW DR F Smoke detector activation due to malfunction woodmill building F was on Fire watch. Dover 21 responded to above address to investigate alarm activation. Building maintenance was on scene doing there building check as required. The maintenance man did say the alarm company was coming to replace bad detectors. 01/24/2013 30046 2013-000059 12:36 127 SAXTON RD Water evacuation Writer responded to above for report of water coming out of the front door. Writer noticed same and noticed the front door was unlocked. Writer entered the residence after announcing Fire Dept several times. Writer noticed once the front door was open a pvc water pipe in the ceiling in the front living room had been broken off and was evacuating water. Writer cleared and scene was turned over to City water and Electric. 01/24/2013 30046 2013-000060 12:48 1202 WHITEOAK RD Detector activation, no fire - unintentional On arrival occupant stated he had an electric heater in the bathroom that activated the alarm. Crews checked the building with negative results. 01/24/2013 30046 2013-000061 21:01 105 N AMERICAN AVE Smoke scare, odor of smoke Writer responded to above for vapor coming from chimney again. Writer noticed a light smoke coming from the heat stack but no major issue. Writer talked to landlord and advised her that the residence had no heat do to no oil in the tank located in the basement. Was placed under control and residents were advised to contact the city ref same. Date: 03/04/2013 Page: 3 Time:11:24

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type 01/25/2013 30046 2013-000062 07:24 1300 S FARMVIEW DR D False alarm or false call, other E6 responded to above for report of alarm sounding . Crews investigated and found no smoke detectors or pull stations activated in the building. Scene was turned over to building maintenance. 01/25/2013 30046 2013-000063 09:18 605 BAY RD Cooking fire, confined to container E6 responded to above for report of alarm sounding . Crew investigated and found someone burnt popcorn in common room microwave. Scene was placed under control. 01/25/2013 30046 2013-000064 11:11 222 S DUPONT HWY Overheated motor On the above date and time E6, L1, E3 responded for report of smoke in the ceiling area of above. Writer assumed command and crews were sent inside from E6 and E3. L1s crews checked the roof area for problems with the HVAC system. Crews found a HVAC system on the roof , above the kitchen area with burned insulation inside of the unit causing the smoke problem in the ceiling area. Power was secured to the entire building until HVAC professional fixes the system. Scene was placed under control and turned over to the Health Inspector and City FM. 01/25/2013 30046 2013-000065 15:23 986 WHATCOAT DR 14 Cooking fire, confined to container THE CALL WAS RECEIVED AS AN OVEN FIRE WITH NO INJURIES AND ALL OCCUPANTS OUT OF THE APT. DOVER PD ARRIVED ON SCENE FIRST AND ADVISED THAT THE FIRE WAS OUT. E3 ARRIVED ON SCENE AND PASSED COMMAND TO E6 OFFICER, G. WHITT. ENGINE THREE'S CREW PROCEEDED INSIDE TO INVESTIGATE AND REQUESTED MECHANICAL VENTILATION FROM THE CREW ON E6. E3 OFFICER CONFIRMED THAT THE FIRE WAS OUT, WENT UNDER CONTROL, AND BOTH UNITS RETURNED. User: SHEPHERD, JAKE 1/25/2013 16:10:03 01/25/2013 30046 2013-000066 19:55 640 S GOVERNORS AVE Service Call, other CREW UNLOCKED THE VEHICLE AND REMOVED THE CHILD WHO WAS UN HARMED. 01/25/2013 30046 2013-000067 20:47 1300 S FARMVIEW DR D False alarm or false call, other Writer completed a walk through of the building with negative results. Writer cleared and turned the scene over to maintenance. 01/26/2013 30046 2013-000068 09:44 283 KENTWOOD DR Cooking fire, confined to container E-3 on location to find a stove on fire with extension to the wall. Fm 28 was notified. E-3 crew did some minor overhaul.. 01/26/2013 30046 2013-000069 12:47 42 STEVENSON DR Dispatched & canceled en route DISPATCHED TO ASSIST BLS AND ALS WITH A CPR. CANCELLED BEFORE ARRIVAL 01/26/2013 30046 2013-000070 14:20 1243 COLLEGE PARK DR Dispatched & canceled en route CALL FROM KENTCENTER ADVISING A WATER FLOW ALARM. SECOND CALL FROM ALARM COMPANY ADVISING PROPER PASSCODE AND WISHING TO CANCEL. CAR 2 WITH 20 CANCELLED UPON RESPONDING. 01/26/2013 30046 2013-000071 16:29 835 BAY RD Smoke detector activation due to malfunction Dover 21 on location of above address was have 2 large dinner events. Due to high volume of smokers smoking it set off the smoke detector in the basement. 01/26/2013 30046 2013-000072 23:38 255 WEBBS LN E Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional A resident called and said they were moving and hit a pull station which set off the fire alarm. Dover 21 investigated it to find a pull station ripped off the wall and the alarm had been silence by the resident that was moving. maintenance was called and informed to fix the pull station that night. 01/27/2013 30046 2013-000073 20:39 1119 FORREST AVE Water problem, other Responded to the above Apt bldg 403 Dove View for a report of water coming from the bldg. Arrived on location and noticed water coming from a closet on the outside of the Apt. Requested that dispatched have the city of Dover water dept make a response as well as maintenance. Water dept on arrived on location and secured the water to the bldg and maintenance secured the water to the sprinkler system. The outside closet door was opened and we found a busted pipe. Scene was placed under control and turned over to maintenance. FM 2 was informed of the problem and he advised that he would stop by Monday morning. 01/28/2013 30046 2013-000074 08:00 330 W WIND DR Cooking fire, confined to container 01/28/2013 30046 2013-000075 08:23 135 HAMAN DR Cooking fire, confined to container CREWS FOUND AN OVEN FIRE THAT WAS EXTINGUSHED PRIOR TO OUR ARRIVAL. CREWS SECURED THE OVEN AND TURNED THE SCENE OVER TO FM1. 01/28/2013 30046 2013-000076 15:01 1200 N DUPONT HWY Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional Pipe broken on the roof. 01/28/2013 30046 2013-000077 18:46 1200 N DUPONT HWY False alarm or false call, other WRITER COMPLETED A WALK THROUGH OF THE BUILDING WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THE SCENE WAS TURNED OVER TO DSU POLICE AND THE BUILDING WAS PLACED ON FIRE WATCH. 01/29/2013 30046 2013-000078 11:32 500 ANN MOORE ST Detector activation, no fire - unintentional Smoke detector activation, unknown 01/29/2013 30046 2013-000079 15:34 1131 N DUPONT HWY No incident found on arrival at dispatch address Writer responded to above for report of black smoke in the area . Writer contacted several employees and checked the entire perimeter of the mall and Dover Downs finding no smoke or fire. 01/29/2013 30046 2013-000080 20:22 1010 LAFFERTY LANE Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional E6 and writer responded to above for report of a heater that backfired. Crews investigated and found no issues . Alarm was reset prior to arrival . 01/30/2013 30046 2013-000081 00:41 100 N. GOVERNORS AVE. Motor vehicle accident with injuries MVC BLS only. 15 cleared all units. 01/30/2013 30046 2013-000082 10:05 302 GOOCHS LN Lock-out Writer responded to above for a child locked in a Red Chrysler Pacifica. Writer used the lock out kit and unlocked the vehicle. 2 year old child Date: 03/04/2013 Page: 4 Time:11:24

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type was okay . No need for EMS. 01/30/2013 30046 2013-000083 15:21 774 S STATE ST Arcing, shorted electrical equipment On arrival DPD was on scene and saw a transformer arching in the area of Gooden Ave and the Alley. City Electric Notified. 01/30/2013 30046 2013-000084 20:14 231 N NEW ST Outside rubbish fire, other Small outside burn pit. Residents advised to keep it under control. 01/31/2013 30046 2013-000085 03:21 1133 S LITTLE CREEK RD Good intent call, other Bad wiring on A/C unit. No need for FM 01/31/2013 30046 2013-000086 08:40 805 RIVER RD System malfunction, other Engine 6 A reporting no activation could not find any alarm activation. Contacted fm2 and placed building on Fire watch. 01/31/2013 30046 2013-000087 15:20 680 BAY RD Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke Owner of a hyundai tiburon thought that her wheel was on fire. Nothing found by FD, only steam from the left rear brake. 01/31/2013 30046 2013-000088 15:34 721 BACON AVE Cooking fire, confined to container Call for unattended cooking, unfounded 01/31/2013 30046 2013-000089 17:45 247 E SHELDRAKE CIR Dispatched & canceled en route Dispatch recieved a call for an oven fire. While on the phone the rp stated to disregard because she just paniced and there was no problem with the oven. No units responded. Total Incidents: 89

FY 12-13 City Funded Account Balance Sheet ACCOUNT BUDGET SPENT BALANCE Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance $ 67,000.00 $ 39,401.53 $ 27,598.47 Building Maintenace Supplies $ 1,650.00 $ 9.69 $ 1,640.31 Contractual Services $ 16,587.00 $ - $ 16,587.00 Electricity $ 51,820.00 $ 2,894.80 $ 48,925.20 Gasoline $ 19,050.00 $ 7,923.03 $ 11,126.97 Heating Expenses- Gas $ 20,000.00 $ 4,960.36 $ 15,039.64 Medical Supplies $ 700.00 $ - $ 700.00 Office Supplies $ 2,500.00 $ 627.63 $ 1,872.37 Other Equipment Repairs $ 4,000.00 $ - $ 4,000.00 Program Expenses $ 36,630.00 $ 12,922.86 $ 23,707.14 Radio Repairs $ 2,000.00 $ 1,085.07 $ 914.93 Safety & Security $ 2,150.00 $ - $ 2,150.00 Small Tools $ 4,800.00 $ 1,265.00 $ 3,535.00 Telephone $ 13,340.00 $ 3,286.25 $ 10,053.75 Training & Travel $ 8,815.00 $ 2,542.50 $ 6,272.50 Uniforms & Firefighting Gear $ 27,100.00 $ 4,470.95 $ 22,629.05 Water/ Sewer $ 3,150.00 $ 716.62 $ 2,433.38 Balance as of: 01/31/13

11:28 AM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 03/02/13 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail January 2013 Type Date Num Name Memo Clr Split Amount Balance Ordinary Income/Expense Expense Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance Check 01/09/2013 787 Atlantic Emergency Solutions Invoice # MOR2939MOP City Fund Account 93.50 93.50 Check 01/09/2013 788 Atlantic Emergency Solutions MOR2887MOP-Eng 2 City Fund Account 264.00 357.50 Check 01/09/2013 788 Atlantic Emergency Solutions MOR2888MOP-Eng 3 City Fund Account 264.00 621.50 Check 01/09/2013 788 Atlantic Emergency Solutions MOR2889MOP-L-1 City Fund Account 264.00 885.50 Check 01/09/2013 788 Atlantic Emergency Solutions MOR2890MOP-Eng 6 City Fund Account 264.00 1,149.50 Check 01/09/2013 788 Atlantic Emergency Solutions MOR2891MOP-Eng 7 City Fund Account 264.00 1,413.50 Check 01/09/2013 788 Atlantic Emergency Solutions MOR2892MOP-Eng 4 City Fund Account 264.00 1,677.50 Check 01/20/2013 792 Atlantic Emergency Solutions Engine 6 Siren Repairs City Fund Account 533.35 2,210.85 Check 01/20/2013 798 Kunkel Auto Supply Invoice # 056405050 City Fund Account 33.83 2,244.68 Total Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance 2,244.68 2,244.68 Electricity Check 01/20/2013 795 City of Dover Utility Acct # 44255-31966 City Fund Account 639.77 639.77 Check 01/20/2013 796 City of Dover Utility Acct # 44343-32052 City Fund Account 2,895.74 3,535.51 Total Electricity 3,535.51 3,535.51 Heating Expenses- Gas Check 01/20/2013 794 Chesapeake Utilities Acct # 01-72348-3180-1 City Fund Account 1,641.05 1,641.05 Check 01/20/2013 794 Chesapeake Utilities Acct # 01-300566-14195-1 City Fund Account 562.92 2,203.97 Total Heating Expenses- Gas 2,203.97 2,203.97 Program Expenses Check 01/20/2013 799 Witmer Public Safety Invoice- 1455434 City Fund Account 171.00 171.00 Total Program Expenses 171.00 171.00 Telephone Check 01/09/2013 791 Verizon Wireless Chief's Phone- $ 199.99 City Fund Account 335.73 335.73 Check 01/20/2013 793 Chief Technologies, LLC Website Hosting City Fund Account 342.00 677.73 Total Telephone 677.73 677.73 Training & Travel Expenses Check 01/20/2013 797 Delaware State Fire School Invoice- 13-1777- Fit Testing City Fund Account 100.00 100.00 Check 01/20/2013 797 Delaware State Fire School Invoice- 13-1776- FTO City Fund Account 150.00 250.00 Total Training & Travel Expenses 250.00 250.00 Uniforms Check 01/09/2013 789 Municipal Emergency Services Invoice # 00368677_SNV City Fund Account 847.78 847.78 Check 01/09/2013 790 Signature Stitches Invoice # 101 City Fund Account 316.70 1,164.48 Total Uniforms 1,164.48 1,164.48 Water/Sewer Check 01/20/2013 795 City of Dover Utility Acct # 44253-31964 City Fund Account 20.58 20.58 Check 01/20/2013 796 City of Dover Utility Acct # 44345-32054 City Fund Account 43.25 63.83 Check 01/20/2013 796 City of Dover Utility Acct # 44341-32050 City Fund Account 11.54 75.37 Total Water/Sewer 75.37 75.37 Total Expense 10,322.74 10,322.74 Net Ordinary Income -10,322.74 -10,322.74 Net Income -10,322.74 -10,322.74 Page 1 of 1

Monthly Report January 2013 Economic Development Office

2013 _01 Economic Development Monthly Report  Provided an economic overview to Hilary Jones of Hospitality Appraisals, the company doing the appraisal for the Extended Stay Suites for Tom Kramedas.  Conference call with Charlie Rodriguez of R&R Commercial Realty with regard to incentives for ILC at Enterprise Park.  Conference call with Joe Zilcosky, DEDO, re ILC and price quotes for facilities in Sussex County and in Kent County.  Reviewed Penoni Pump Station data with Gregg Moore and Jason Lyons for the Garrison Tract.  Gave an interview to Anthony Prado from the Dover Post regarding the Downtown Dover Partnership’s Annual Report.  Teleconference with Stu Widom and Champe Fisher from Calpine regarding Cartanza right-of- way agreement and moving of fence by DP&L. Discussed the need for compensation for the City for the easement at Cartanza.  Met with Mark Wagner of the Carpenters Union with regard to the EPC for the Calpine project.  Discussed ILC with the Mayor, discussed the problem with the Playtex Plant and asked him to call ILC.  Met with Val DeRocili regarding Chesapeake Supply and Capitol Scrap.  Met with Joe Petrosky regarding the mortgage and note for 1 West Loockerman.  Discussed with Becker Morgan the status of the stormwater review at Kent Conservation District for Calpine and the Garrison Tract.  Teleconference with Calpine, Mayor Carey, Councilman Bonar in regard to the road loop, new sewer line, and the road from the Sun Park to Lot 7.  Met with Mike Frebert regarding Brown Water recharge and the impact on property value on North DuPont Highway.  Discussed with former Councilman Salters easements for parking on site for Inner City Cultural League.  Informed Calpine that Jared Atkins from Kent Conservation District has comment letter with regard to stormwater plan on Lot 7.  Provided Council with annual report for the Downtown Dover Partnership.  Reviewed the RFP’s for the DDP Building for Architectural and Engineering Fit-out with Ted Nutter and Ann Marie Townshend, made recommendation to DDP Board for awarding the bid.  Conference call with Stu and Beth from Calpine to discuss the letter addressed to the Harmon’s regarding annexation of their property into the City.  Forwarded a copy of Ann Marie Townshend’s letter to the Harmon’s to Champ Fisher at Calpine.  Attended the Tourism Board meeting and provided a briefing on economic development projects.  Responded to Jim Waddington’s request for a site for a 500,000 square foot warehouse space and discussed possible locations - Tilcon, Reichold Chemical, and McKee Business Park with Charlie Rodriguez.

 Discussed the easement with Constance Malmberg with regard to fence along Citizens Bank property.  Met with Erin Cooper to discuss rezoning of 49 N New St for potential to construct a mixed use building.  Attended KCI Open House.  Attended Wilmington DEED meeting with Gary Patterson and became a member of DEED.  Met with Councilman Bonar regarding Calpine.  Signed the grant applications for Chesapeake Supply and Capitol Scrap for reimbursement of brownfield monies.  Met with Jonathan Street to separate charges for North Street Parking Lot from North Street Infrastructure improvements on Kent Construction invoice.  Met with attorney Jeff Young in reference to parking lot clean-up behind his office.  Completed the credit card set-up with WSFS and the parking meter company.  Met with Jim Waddington and provided overview of the Bayard Pharmacy and the Bayard Plaza.  Attended the Legislative Briefing sponsored by the Greater Dover Committee at Delaware State University.  Met with Mayor Carey and Beverly Jackson to develop the Economic Development Office Budget for FY14.  Talked to Jeff Stone at DEDO regarding a site for a company looking for 100,000 square feet of manufacturing and food processing space.  Prepared a summary of Garrison Infrastructure with a map for DEDO.  Provided Jeff Stone information on the Garrison Tract regarding water, sewer, road and property tax rates.  Met with Joe Petrosky regarding the former LEX site and a possible tenant.  Discussed the easement with Gregg Moore that Reuben Salters has requested for the ICCL building.  Discussed the national monument proposal with Lori James from Senator Carper’s office and the potential economic impact for the City of Dover.  Met with Henry Mast and reviewed the Bayard Pharmacy fit-out and timeframe.  Toured the Bayard Plaza apartments.  Met with Eric Mabus and discussed the impact fee abatements for the Bayard Pharmacy.  Attended the Kent Profile unveiling at Dover Public Library.  Met with Stu Widom to discuss easement arrangements at the Cartanza substation.  Met with Bob Ruggio to discuss downstate projects and marketing those projects.  Reviewed Verizon bill with Becker Morgan to discuss cost overruns and next steps with Verizon and Comcast.  Instructed Kent Construction to clean-up parking lot adjacent to Terry Jackson’s office.

 Teleconference with Delaware Electric Signal to discuss security fit-out for 22-24 W Loockerman Street.  Set-up economic summit meeting with the Committee of 100 to brief the Committee on downstate economic development initiatives.  Inspected 22-24 W Loockerman Street with Bryan Hutchison and notified contractors of deficiencies.  Attended a conference call with Calpine to discuss who will pay for the road extension and the timeframe for installing the road extension.  Discussed the not-for-profit status of the Downtown Dover Partnership with Bill Winters and provided the State documents showing the reinstatement of Main Street Dover – Inc. by the state.  Teleconference with Mike Miles from Delaware State Housing Authority in reference to inclement weather maintenance in North Street parking lot.  Inspected the roof at 22-24 W Loockerman with roof repairman and contracted for repair of four (4) existing leaks.  Teleconference with ICMA TV in regards to a Brownfield Television spot at the National Brownfields Conference to be held in Atlanta.  Met with Mike Vanderslice with regards to Brownfield site remediation.  Attended the groundbreaking of Harvest Ridge Winery.  Prepared fence easement between the Downtown Partnership and Citizens Bank with the assistance of Becker Morgan. Measures: 1. Maintain an unemployment rate for the City of Dover that is lower than national and state averages. 2010-2011 Actual 2011-2012 Actual 2012 - 2013 Projected Results <10% unemployment rate in <10% unemployment rate in <10% unemployment rate in July 2011 July 2012 July 2013 9.2 % - U.S. Rate 8.2% - U.S. Rate 7.8% - U.S. Rate 8.0 % - DE Rate 6.8 % - DE Rate 6.9% - DE Rate 9.9% - City of Dover Rate 8.6% - City of Dover Rate 8.4% - City of Dover Rate June 2011 – Actual June 2012 – Actual December 2012 – Actual* *Delaware unemployment statistics for January 2013 have not been published as of 2/28/13. 2. Monitor number of contacts with small businesses and with out-of-town companies interested in locating in Dover. 2010-2011 Actual 2011-2012 Actual 2012 - 2013 Projected Results ≥20 contacts with potential >20 contacts with potential >20 contacts with potential

small businesses; small businesses; small businesses; 12 contacts YTD 10 Contacts YTD 11 Contacts YTD ≥15 contacts with out-of-town 11 contacts with out-of-town 11 contacts with out-of-town companies interested in companies interested in companies interested in locating in Dover. locating in Dover locating in Dover 10 contacts YTD 9 Contacts YTD 5 Contacts YTD 2013_01 Downtown Dover Partnership  Provided technical assistance to seven (7) prospective small business individuals on overall business development within the Downtown Dover Business District.  Provided technical assistance (orientation) to two (2) existing small business owners in preparing and submitting small business loan application for loan consideration.  Continued providing technical assistance to nine (9) prospective small business individuals on locating available space within the downtown district to lease. Of these nine (9) inquiries; one (1) has signed leases to occupy current vacant spaces within downtown.  Provided technical assistance to one (1) existing small business owner on relocating businesses within district boundaries.  Coordinated and implemented with the Design Committee the Annual Star Celebration Reception.  Coordinated media (newspaper announcement), website and social media press releases of series of Special Events which occurred during January ’13 in downtown Dover.  In collaboration with the YWCA Delaware conducted four (4) small business development trainings on Business Basics for seventeen (17) participants.  Attended the Quarterly Main Street Manager’s Idea Exchange training on January 16 -17, 2013.  Attended the Delaware Cyber Security Awareness Training on January 8, 2013.  Attended the National League of Cities – Economic Development Webinar on January 22, 2013.  Attended the Kent County Profile Unveiling Ceremony on January 29, 2013.  Completed first phase of the Parking Committee Annual Downtown Dover Safety & Security with the participation of fifty-four merchants.

City Assessor’s Office MEMO TO: Mayor & Council FROM: Cheryl A. Russell, AAS RE: Property Assessment Appeal Dates I request the following dates and times be established for the 2013 Property Assessment Appeals. May 20, 2013 - May 24, 2013 9:00 A.M. until 4:00 P.M. May 28, 2013 – May 31, 2013 9:00 A.M. until 4:00 P.M.* One evening – if needed The hearing times are subject to change. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Assessor’s Office. *If Needed

Memorandum Office of the City Manager PO Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Phone: (302) 736-7005 FAX: (302) 736-7002 E-mail: skoenig@dover.de.us To: Members of City Council From: Scott D. Koenig, P.E. City Manager Date: March 6, 2013 Subject: Request to Table Various Items on March 11, 2013 Agenda In light of the discussion at the last City Council meeting with respect to the Letter of Credit for the Village of Cannon Mill, I am requesting that final action by the Dover City Council for the following items be delayed until the Regular Council Meeting scheduled for Monday, March 25, 2013: Dedication of Rights-of-Way and Utilities – Village of Cannon Mill - Phase I (Item # 7.B.b-1.) Dedication of Rights-of-Way and Utilities – Village of Westover – Phase VI (Item # 7.B.b-2.) Evaluation of Bids – Cannon Mill Paving Improvements Program (Item # 11.) The sight draft for the Village of Westover – Phase VI Letter of Credit is being presented to M&T Bank. The timeline for the issuance of funds is unconfirmed at the time of this writing. Staff intends to seek further action on the Letter of Credit for the Village of Cannon Mill; therefore, action on the paving contract bids for the Village of Cannon Mill should also be delayed until the second meeting in March. cc: City Clerk’s Office Donna Mitchell, Controller William Pepper, Assistant City Solicitor

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: City Council AGENDA ITEM: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Works DATE SUBMITTED: 02/01/2013 PREPARED BY: Sharon J. Duca, P.E., Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Evaluation of Bids – Cannon Mill Paving Improvements Program REFERENCE: CIP – Street & Alley Program RELATED PROJECT: FY 2013 Street & Alley Program APPROVALS: City Manager, Controller EXHIBITS: Aerial Map EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ 275,854.27 AMOUNT BUDGETED: See Funding Source FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Multiple Funding Sources: $1,546,700 General Fund; $700,000 Community Transportation Funds; $256,214 Municipal Street Aid Fund CIP Page: 91 Account No.: 147-1800-554.40-31 and 318-990-582.40-31 TIME TIMETABLE: Notice to Proceed to be issued within 60 days of Council approval. Project anticipated to be completed in 120 calendar days from Notice to Proceed issuance. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Award a unit price contract, based upon Bid #13-0016PW for the Cannon Mill Paving Improvements Program to Harmony Construction Co. based on the With Prevailing Wage unit prices for each work item submitted. The Scope of Work for the program will be altered to reflect the funding that has been secured to complete each location. The Public Works Director may add or delete from the contract based on available funding throughout the contract period and inform the City Manager of such additions and deletions. All work will be paid for at the unit prices bid for work completed and accepted by the City of Dover. The total work authorized under this contract will not exceed the available funding in conjunction with the co-project FY 2013 Street & Alley Program. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS In concurrence with the City of Dover’s Capital Investments Plan, it is proposed to rehabilitate and complete pavement sections within the City of Dover during Fiscal Year 2013. In particular, the final pavement section, type ‘C’ surface coat, was never installed in the Cannon Mill Subdivision due to the project owners filing for bankruptcy. The total length of scheduled street repaving / overlaying is approximately 4, 230 linear feet or 0.80 miles. The following locations were included in the proposed scope of work to be completed under the Cannon Mill Paving Improvements Program: STREET NAME EXHIBIT TITLE STREET NAME EXHIBIT TITLE CANNON MILL DRIVE CANNON MILL PARADEE DRIVE CANNON MILL EAST SHELDRAKE CIRCLE CANNON MILL QUILLEN STREET CANNON MILL LESTER COURT CANNON MILL WEST SHELDRAKE CIRCLE CANNON MILL

Bids were opened on Wednesday, January 30, 2013. Nine (9) contractors submitted unit price bids for the proposed work to be performed. Based on the proposed quantities, the estimated contract values are as follows: CONTRACTOR LOCATION AMOUNT OF BID (WITH AMOUNT OF BID (WITHOUT PREVAILING WAGES) PREVAILING WAGES) AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. WEST CHESTER, PA $336, 332.80 $333, 140.50 DAISY CONSTRUCTION CO. NEW CASTLE, DE $290, 319.70 $277, 479.60 DAVID A. BRAMBLE, INC. CHESTERTOWN, MD $289, 980.70 $275, 437.10 DEL-MAR-VA PAVING CO., INC. SEAFORD, DE $285, 975.35 $261, 440.05 DIAMOND MATERIALS, LLC WILMINGTON, DE $294, 611.18 $278, 888.26 GEORGE & LYNCH DOVER, DE $326, 124.05* $314, 028.15* GWP ENTERPRISES FRANKLINVILLE, NJ $288, 424.34 $281, 469.47 HARMONY CONSTRUCTION CO. WILMINGTON, DE $275, 854.27 $264, 051.33 JERRY'S PAVING INC. MILFORD, DE $283, 959.67 $266, 517.90 *Evaluated Bid based on Local Vendor Preference The Cannon Mill Paving Improvements Program contract documents allow staff to alter quantities up to 35% without changes to unit prices; therefore, the contract final value may be adjusted to reflect all available funding. Harmony Construction Co. submitted all of the contractor’s qualification information, which included a list of recently completed projects similar in scope, as well as a financial statement, that were all found to be adequate. It is staff’s opinion that the bid represents fair market value and their qualifications are in accordance with the requirements of this project. In conclusion, staff recommends awarding a construction contract to Harmony Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $275, 854.27 for the Cannon Mill Paving Improvement Program contingent upon acceptance of infrastructure dedication by City Council. Representative Scott has committed $100,000 in new community transportation funds to offset the cost of these improvements and staff is also seeking funding from other leg to provide additional offsets of cost.

416 10 14 412 15 408 6 11 DATE PRINTED: February 19, 2013 404 2 7 1570 FILE: m:\gis data\projects\tech_mxds 392 38 8 400 399 3 \cannon_mill_road_paving_map 400 363 396 392 395 384 396 405 1 inch = 315 feet DEPARTMENT: Public Works GIS 388 392 381 359 384 383 388 379 384 380 400 City of Dover, Delaware 355 380 409 376 375 380 363 377 351 372 371 376 359 376 Tribbitt St 372 404 413 347 364 363 368 355 373 343 360 359 364 351 372 ± 408 417 339 356 352351 355 360 356 347 369 328 335 348 347 352 368 412 421 344 343 348 343 331 344 365 324 340 339 339 364 416 327 336 335 340 335 425 331 336 Paradee Dr 361 Loftland Dr Village of Cannon Mills 320 323 332 328327 331 360 420 324 323 328332 429 319 324 327 357 319 356 316 315 316 320 320 323 424 433 312 311 316 351 311 308 307 312 319 352 349 312 307 303 308 347 304 315 345 428 437 304 348 343 441 308 303 311 341 432 449 307 304 338 337 43 6 445 27 30 27 0 3 336 335 189 2784 259 440 176 5 18 81 282 334 332 333 331 444 17 1 263 330 328 329 327 448 172 7 258 509 507 452 173 267 326 317 505 262 168 169 6 255 324 322 313 315 503 26 251 Fair 501 254 320 318 309 311 ne s 247 t Ct 164 316 307 305 243 508 402 12 312 239 504 5 310 308 500 121 235 403 401 306 304 160 231 407 405 117 302 10 10 8 113 230 409 10 6 156 Charring Cross Dr 410 2 10 111 413 411 412 10 4 152 227 272 0 223 414 339 337 333 219 270 268 415 341 148 215 48 303 418 343 211 266 264 207 260 263 347 345 144 203 261 44 47 W Sheldrake Cir E Sheldrake Cir 199 195 258 257 255 140 256 191 254 252 253 251 40 41 187 249 136 183 250 179 175 246 245 36 35 132 242 243 171 167 240 241 239 32 31 Pennington Pl 128 237 163 159 236 233 27 124 155 232 231 28 W estover Quillen St 151 230 228 229 23 28 4 147 Dr Northdown Dr 120 32 36 40 44 8 12 16 20 227 24 48 24 143 139 226 225 135 223 221 19 116 131 224 222 219 20 111 112 116 220 217 15 107 108 12 103 104 12 7 218 16 2 3 11 11 3 C T 9 215 12 11 5 216 raff 11 7 ir cl e 4 213 111 8 Le ic 214 s te 16 19 107 Tha mes 11 rC t 107 109 111 108 112 103 8 211 Dr 12 212 6 15 105 15 101 12 8 209 103 11 210 20 4 7 104 Type 16 20 4 20 7 5 102 Gag 203 2 101 5055 en 3 104 Legend Cannon Mill Dr Ct Trafalgar Paving Area 101 Dr 10 5 204 102 Dover Parcels 103 202 104 Hazlettville Rd 19 15 11 7 2 3 5096 18 14 10 6 2

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council AGENDA ITEM NO.: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Works - Wastewater DATE SUBMITTED: 3/1/13 PREPARED BY: Sharon Duca, P.E., Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Change Order for NRG Sanitary Sewer Upgrade REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: Inflow / Infiltration Removal APPROVALS: City Manager and Controller EXHIBITS: Attachment A (Site Plan), Attachment B (Change Order Submission) EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $57,622 (Original Approved Bid - $105,500) AMOUNT BUDGETED: $175,000 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Wastewater Management, Inflow / Infiltration Removal, CIP Account Number 417-6900-569.40-31, Project #II1305. This is one component of the tasks proposed within this project. TIME T TIMETABLE: Upon approval, project should be completed within six (6) weeks. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends approval of change order request, submitted by Tri-State Grouting, LLC, in the amount of $57,622. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS This project, which was approved by Council on October 22, 2012, began in earnest in late January. The contractor, Tri-State Grouting, LLC, has experienced significant unforeseen challenges that need to be addressed in order to accomplish the project assigned to them by the City of Dover. The following tabulation depicts the issues encountered on this project: ISSUE DESCRIPTION COST Additional Joints Original plan called for one joint to be repaired, due to the large volume of flow in pipe, to be original video could not detect additional issues. $3,000 Rehabilitated Increase in Pump To repair this sanitary sewer main, a bypass pump system was to be installed by the Size contractor, they were told to bypass a six-inch (6”) pipe and a fifteen (15”) pipe, actual field $3,000 conditions merited bypassing two (2) fifteen-inch (15”) pipes. Topsoil and Seed Due to the infiltration, a sink hole has been created on this site. The bid documents did not Sinkhole call out for site restoration if the non-evasive rehabilitation option was chosen (Tri-State $1,250 Grouting proposed relining). Contractor Lost An additional infiltration point was identified in the pipe after the pipe was bypassed. This Time was not identified because of the volume of flow in the pipe when the original video survey was conducted. The contractor had their labor and sub-contractors on site to and scheduled $26,427 to work that week to finalize the liner. Due to the new leak, the work could not be accomplished. The warranty on the liner would be voided had they proceeded. Well Pointing In an effort to stop the infiltration long enough to install the relining material to a dry surface, the contractor has proposed well pointing the perimeter of the existing sanitary $14,445 sewer main. This method has been approved by staff on a technical basis. Infiltration Patch To properly stop the infiltration and reassure that the relining material will not fail, a point $3,800 repair was proposed for the infiltration location within the pipe. Heavy Cleaning of Due to the infiltration, a large amount of sediment has built up inside the sewer main, $5,400 Sewer Main properly cleaning the main will assure a proper installation of the relining material. TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST $57,622 Staff believes that the above change orders are reasonable and are needed to properly finish the project. In accordance with the City of Dover Purchasing Policy & Procedures, Section 3.10, staff respectfully requests Council Approval for this Change Order.

ATTACHMENT A 1280 West North Street NRG Sanitary Sewer Upgrade 100 195 W North St 1260 Sanitary Sewer 1250 to be Rehabilitated 1310 1300 1280 1340 0 50 100 Feet Legend Pipe to Be Rehabilitated Sewer Line 20" 36" Date Printed: October 12, 2012 Pump Station 10" 21" 4" File: m:\gis_data\projects\tech_mxds \attachment_a_1280_w_north_st 12" 24" 6" Manholes Department: Public Works GIS Force Main 15" 27" 8" City of Dover, Delaware 16" 30" Dover Parcels 18" 35"

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: City Council AGENDA ITEM: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Works DATE SUBMITTED: 03/01/2013 PREPARED BY: Sharon J. Duca, P.E., Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Evaluation of Bids – Mowing Contract REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: City Manager, Controller EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1 – Grass Areas for Contract Maps Exhibit 2 – Proposed Mowing Contract Costs Exhibit 3 – Proposed Mowing Contract Costs by Division EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ 11,745.00 FY 2013 Spring $ 32,820.00 CY 2013 Mowing Season AMOUNT BUDGETED: $ 10,000 FY 2013 $ 33,000 FY 2014 Proposed FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Public Works Grounds Division Operating Budget, Page 263, Account No.: 110-1500-522.30-31. It is requested that the deficit be accounted for through savings realized in the 10 series due to staffing shortages in FY 2013. TIME TIMETABLE: Notice to Proceed to be issued within 30 days of Council approval. FY 2013 work will occur from April 15, 2013 to June 30, 2013. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Award a mowing contract to Priority Services LLC in the amount of $32,820.00 for the CY 2013 mowing season. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The City of Dover has been evaluating services performed by the City that can be privatized. Due to resignations and retirements within the Grounds Division of the Department of Public Works, as well as the need to avoid high employee and worker’s compensation costs, the contracting out of some of the mowing services has been reviewed by the Department. The areas under consideration consist primarily of those that require a considerable amount of staff time investment, particularly in that mobilization can require as much, if not more, time as the work itself. Staff made contact with Priority Services LLC, the company which currently holds the State mowing contract. They submitted prices for the locations identified within the exhibits and noted that they would maintain the prices throughout the mowing season rather than just the current fiscal year. $10,000 is currently available within the Grounds Division’s operating budget and savings have also been realized due to staffing shortages. In addition, the line item budget for this work has been submitted to be increased to cover annualized costs, which is offset by staffing reductions. Staff recommends awarding a mowing contract to Priority Services LLC in the amount of $32,820.00 for the CY 2013 mowing season.

Grass Areas for Contract Page 1 Exhibit Cartanza Substation Entrance Route 9 Pumping Station White Oak Road Wellhouse Cartanza Field Wellhouse Ap r il Dr Rd k Ln te oa la r k Me ad Long hi ow Po in t W Rd White Oak ni ng u r Ln Road Pumping Station M o ov e D Legend Ma Pur r t pl in e W ay Grass Areas Proposed for Contract Contract Costs ¯ Cartanza Substation: $30.00 Date Printed: January 15, 2013 Route 9 Pumping Station: $25.00 File: m:\gis_data\projects\tech_mxds White Oak road Wellhouse: $25.00 \contracted_grass_areas_1 Cartanza Field Wellhouse: $25.00 Department: Public Works GIS Rd Long White Oak Road Pumping Station: $40.00 it e o ak City of Dover, Delaware 1 inch = 1,060 feet Point Rd Wh

Dr in g k ee ri n d Dr cr G W h e el k Dr Sc arboroug Mi Grass Areas for Contract ll G ris t mi ll P l h Rd cr ee ill st M G m ri Page 2 Exhibit Rd i ll P l Mc Ke ys eR n ne d a te De St W ar e ity e law s t le D e Unive r ap r M nD Maple e Sta ity Ct le G n s en to e a Dr ng or i ve war G vi r De l l r o D Un n C ate St y ski Rd De it Se ey s Delaw rs a Unive re Dr Sta te lawa re nn te Dr De No rsity i Unive ne rth yw W ga d Mi an w Dr ch Br M ae cK lC D e la ware ee Unive S t ate ad t o Ke Rd n si rsity State College Me ng C t to n H em st e d Ct Road Pumping Station t yC M Fai r w a Ct is ho St l St go ry ra t as G re Ve y ip C d Wa ill on on m J Ph y Ct Ra St Wh ite m ar s h C C e ol w on le on st Pa D ge Topaz em lvd lS r rk el Cir G B t A Sc ar in k m ug ni ro C t Me ro r io l bo d m lP R n pa D t Rd er h Wes st Med i na h Retreat oo O W es in tm Tr rn oc k Ct Pumping n Rd r W Station tm in es Ct in st e yR Ct te rD ni st e d Po rtm e Tanz a r a in t Ct ar kC d R rD A ug s am t e r es usta tm es t le a ltra e rn Tam O qu C g i Baltray Ct w ic v Dr n s t Ct A ol B In r Ct er e Shante C Pumping Blac kh Pin wich Pr es Ct t C ak Station O W d S Pre M Ho San d yR stw cK yl Dr e ath ak all Fore ee R Ann Ct i c k e Pi ne V t O a R ed t C st Ave dC N r d eatl es kD C e e Cir ey r kD ie l nea r rf gl ui Wh on r Al M o nt Dr ylo O akm G le Lo nt t Ho Q llo ua il Ta Dr Dr ee s t ple ai s C w zo Tr Ma ne Ba ow Dr Ct a d Ln S Me d e n l tu wn Virgi n Br o dale Rd r Ga Av nia A ol St sr An Sain e O ld D r Turnberry Ct dr e t Be d ws e oo F or g Ironw ag Vil Ct llr Pumping iv e Cir e l Ct Station Dr urnbe Ke Hitc hing o u sti e Rd Post Dr NT n t Ci t tn u Dr rr y r Vi es Rd S Turnberr tage Dr ll C h ove y Dr eri Gr Ar bor D i ot o Ct a ge H Ke n d t on Wi Ca er R r Rd rn Walk Dr Fo nge d Sc Ln Mo ot Rd ie Ct st W in H a r mony Shin D r h n ec Fo ge rio t ir Bla As ock ot d Ca Ar nt tc o a t C l be r g W ha Rd r no Pat Ct Rd u Pl m nc B Dr Haz e Klei ed r g Cirb Ho m o l ti n e C n lvd eR Ke Sauls t Fr e d n to d eR Liberty D nR r n Dr d ratio b ury s ti la r D ec Sw ee Ca M a t t e r ho rn D ee n i n r e Bu r rn bl D r ou Rd Freed o m D r u T Rd g tg Dr ley M m Peb W Val ter Ln ou se Peb pligh L am English Village/The Es ng h E ig er C eeti L n r lD t Va e l bl e y P Greens Retention Pond H a rrow s ex n nn n ta ll ee e Dr e B i c e nt e l v d Dr Ha in ll Ln ad r ny D Gr ck ll on vy Hae B wi t a l Ct C Co lo Bl Ta l lo oo d Heatherfield Ca rolin Te Fie lds ton ia l I ar w Br i Ct Pumping N Ct as e Pl Sprin Geo rg e Pl ne te r C Station oli Per Gree n W h ing to P a ul ence Blvd r Sto n C old Contract Costs Pew Ca nd R e v e re C S to n Bro o e gP B lade D r nD ey Dr pe n Rd k l erse Pl w o dro N K ento r de t t C ir le D Wo Ct ht C t t In r iwink Tuc tStation:Che S om Dwig State College Road Pumping ke ls $30.00 ea Way Heatherfield Gree n ee n tree D Retreat Pumping Station: Ci r Fa Ma tthe w East Firelane Sq way Greenwa y Ln Gr r Stoney Dr lmo $25.00 Ke Ct W a ut h Cranbe Ct vi Ham pton Dr ad ison Greentree Dr Andrew Dr M y rr n Run D y Baltray Pumping Station: $25.00 Ct H am pton D r P ar Hav en Dr t r on C Turnberry Pumping Station: $25.00 L Ct Je ffer s fton Cre ek Ya irwa y n Ct o ut A s Ct n rm Heatherfield Pumping Station: h Way $40.00 sh Fa es D r Afto m A da Mar k La June Ln English Village Retention Pond: $60.00 Fo rrest Ave Forrest Ave Bennington S t Heatherfield East Fire Lane: $70.00 n ffli ¯ Mi wn St Fa Legend Rd N Farmview Dr t o n St Date Printed: January 15, 2013 S Farmv iew Dr Grass Areas File: m:\gis_data\projects\tech_mxds Benn i n g \contracted_grass_areas_2 Department: Public Works GIS afa lgar Dr Woo dmill Dr ga t e Tr City of Dover, Delaware Mar r Ci 1 inch = 1,300 feet ffl Mi d R in Proposed for Contract

ad fo Freed o m D r th S t N Br M ee t nn Smi B l v i al a Pea r er ic d English Village/The E ing h o E i g er t Mary Street N A m ve Pen Grass Areas for Contract Greens Retention Pond Ha rrow Dr a ll s se Ivy H x n ee eDr ad t t al n e in r D us e Bicent e Ct Clar a Ex St Ma r y St Playlot rd S t Ce c il St N St A n ns y lvan ate S Gr on l Ct C war e Ln H all M ap D ela e Bl lin aro Page 3 Exhibit lin eP l N C ePl ea T Spr in g Gr e en as W dence Blvd G eorg h g to P a ul Sau lsbu NW NK NQ ue e NN ew S NG no rs Fu lt on St t Av ia A ve l e Ln ov e r g el o od Peri y e ro Ston e r in t er R id St i rkw Cold R e v er e n B rook Blad e D Pew n n St isio pe Pl est Hw n Dr t Pl Ct N Ca K en to n Rd Ct C ry Rd E D iv de le D row t yS gs ood ht Ct St w ink Dwig Ave In r Gre en w W on St Kin Fult t e Ca rv er Rd entr e D St Ln Gre to n St a y Sq Greenw a y r Ct Wes ivisi o a d ison WD H ampt Greentre e Dr r Andrew D r M Pa r Hav e n D a df o on S Br e Dr n Dr irw ay nC to t Afto n C t sh ed St M a r Ln d rt r F a es D r Ct W Re a te si ms F or e S St Aly Af k D L ak A da Forest St Cr e e Cou Be tS SW Stre et Forrest Av e n r t r an d t Forest S d St rm a G ibbs Dr June t ee rd S cke s WR r M in o Bennington t S Loo laza Ln D r Bedford St est St P Lincoln S t St t an S t Be rtrand Dr nR t ocke rm rth S Dav is Cir ad Cherry St ffl i wn St ilro W Lo E No Mi R eese St Fa N Fa rmvie w Dr Ra ve alem A gton P aul St J e rus SG d S Farmv iew Dr The e Way Be nni re Davis Cir Ave St St rence t n n Ir m a se S t rS Ln ghte n ors h otgun G C la Re e Slau SN k Si Ba n C fa Tra lgar D Woo dm ill D r ov e r H aye s on C th S t M inim Rd W Nor ir ew S S r m bury k Ln fflin o Aly Mi d Simn Ba n r St S S auls ir es er D R r t a St Ci t th S t Ba n S St h W N or rc St ate S Wo Comm e rce n ing ater Ter Commerce Commerce Wa WW Elm Ch f fl t Mi Wa y Way C r arr llh St To in o d Rd fli n B lv d ou g M if y er ry R in D r t Pl Be i s th S se ss Wa S ou l sb u n Pe Pl to Sau i ng Wyoming Mill nn y St Realignment Dr ue e W es Rd n es am W North St yss y tov Th Wem een berr est SW e SQ S Gr L n Ann St rD t Hope St re r M oo S R ut h th r Rd N d ow n D Way or lle t vi et zl Dove r St Ha byshire d r t n R De C to ur Ct Ln B od al e ew Gooden o d n Konschak N e rw Ave x o n De Sh Sa kL shi Avenue oo Sunset Ter Monroe Ter ittin r b y ve Br br G ill Ln A Open Space ch ak Waples Ave le gh re e va K S Bradford St am u Woodford on Be in g Janeka Ln om Shank Rd Dr W y ill R d Av s c Ave M ctri Dr E le Wyoming Ave es Dr We s tview Ter ood se d g e Rd l Ch ar W Jefferson Wo o Ter db ur Dr n Monroe Cir Yearsley Ter Holly Dr Westwood Dr Ma l l a rd Dr St ew Cres cent Dr O ak D r ar Riverside Rd tC nt t po k Ly nn hav e n Dr Du wy B C ree Rd Beach S H lue B e nd Sh ad Ct ow Ca n a l St F iddlers Dr D G rn ea k kle ts CricLn Dr un e gw R Cre Do gwood Av eDo n r e o to Wi ch e c rb Pu n onn oo n te er dC ry Dr C Alde r Rd n Ru r Dr t o an Ave c t Kesselring SD m Pos t up Ha H w ont P Blvd Turn d Ave y Mock ingbir un er Dr c Co heo nn n Legend e Mimos a Av e Garton Ln Mayberry Ln Grass Areas Web bs er op R d Co ate Ln t Es We bbs Ln Proposed for Contract Contract Costs Mary Street Playlot: $50.00 Konschak Avenue Open Space: $35.00 Rodney Village Wellhouse: $50.00 Schutte Park Addition*: $1025.00 *Schutte Park Addition is under State Contract GSS13062 Rodney Village Well House ¯ Date Printed: January 15, 2013 File: m:\gis_data\projects\tech_mxds \contracted_grass_areas_3 Department: Public Works GIS City of Dover, Delaware 1 inch = 1,500 feet

Hol m e s St Barriste r Signal S Little Pl St Creek Rd Rober t Ave a Grass Areas for Contract Page 4 ExhibitBa Ot r l Ct Maggie s Wa y D Ct er Cr is wl D Dr Fo MC aw r fo Ha rd sle t Av e St C t ey Schoolview Hor Ke arsn e Pumping ond ag Station se p um Ct Pl Rd Ln rty B ulld ffe La o g Dr Ho r se n W S Ru r ic R d pon t n d k h eo ecto nc nn Ho Pu Co e Hw rs e n y1 R d po n Ru d n e o t or c h ne c S tat n Pu Con e Hw y1 S ta t rs Ho yR o Ba ep t en d nd id Rd es r Pr D Ba yR d e Starlifter Av Galax y D r Ba y Horsepond Road Pumping R d B ay e an o nL Station st ing Rd Liv lin er e M an Ct Ba rl Ls w ler an Fo d Ho r s Ev eR epon d R d S i r ay st l Ct W Ca L n M ay s Bay Ave Rd tan Buf n e s Rd Ja ne J a Ci r s Lebanon Substation/Wellhouse/Parking Lot Legend Grass Areas Proposed for Contract ¯ Contract Costs Date Printed: January 15, 2013 US File: m:\gis_data\projects\tech_mxds Hw y1 Schoolview Pumping Station: $35.00 \contracted_grass_areas_4 13 Department: Public Works GIS Horsepond Road Pumping Station: $35.00 City of Dover, Delaware 1 inch = 1,200 feet Lebanon Substation/Wellhouse: $50.00

Department of Public Works PO Box 475 Dover, Delaware 19903 Phone: (302)‐736‐7025 Fax: (302)‐736‐4217 PROPOSED MOWING CONTRACT COSTS Total Weekly Weekly Total Staff Total Staff Contract Contract Cost Contract Cost Mowing Mobilization Hours Saved Salary Saved Location Division Cost April 15 ‐ June Per Season Time Time Per Season Per Season per Cut 30 (11 Weeks) (31 Weeks) (minutes) (minutes) (31 Weeks) (31 Weeks) Baltray Pump Station Wastewater $ 25.00 $ 275.00 $ 775.00 20 30 25.8 $ 1,405.73 Cartanza Field Well Water $ 35.00 $ 385.00 $ 1,085.00 30 30 31.0 $ 1,681.44 Cartanza Substation Electric $ 30.00 $ 330.00 $ 930.00 25 30 28.4 $ 1,542.56 English Village Retention Pond Grounds $ 60.00 $ 660.00 $ 1,860.00 20 30 25.8 $ 1,534.80 Heatherfield Fire Lane Grounds $ 70.00 $ 770.00 $ 2,170.00 20 30 25.8 $ 1,534.80 Heatherfield Pump Station Wastewater $ 40.00 $ 440.00 $ 1,240.00 20 30 25.8 $ 1,534.80 Horsepond Road Pump Station Wastewater $ 35.00 $ 385.00 $ 1,085.00 30 30 31.0 $ 1,681.44 Konschak Avenue Open Space Grounds $ 35.00 $ 385.00 $ 1,085.00 30 30 31.0 $ 1,681.44 Lebanon Substation & Lot Electric $ 50.00 $ 550.00 $ 1,550.00 40 30 36.2 $ 1,958.52 Mary Street Park Grounds $ 50.00 $ 550.00 $ 1,550.00 30 30 31.0 $ 1,681.44 Retreat Pump Station Wastewater $ 25.00 $ 275.00 $ 775.00 20 30 25.8 $ 1,405.73 Rodney Village Well Water $ 50.00 $ 550.00 $ 1,550.00 25 30 28.4 $ 1,542.56 Route 9 Well Water $ 35.00 $ 385.00 $ 1,085.00 30 30 31.0 $ 1,681.44 Schoolview Pump Station Wastewater $ 35.00 $ 385.00 $ 1,085.00 20 30 25.8 $ 1,405.73 Schutte Park Addition* Grounds $ 1,025.00 $ 4,100.00 $ 11,275.00 510 30 99.0 $ 5,862.78 State College Road Pump Station Wastewater $ 30.00 $ 330.00 $ 930.00 30 30 31.0 $ 1,681.44 Turnberry Pump Station Wastewater $ 25.00 $ 275.00 $ 775.00 20 30 25.8 $ 1,405.73 White Oak Road Pump Station Wastewater $ 30.00 $ 330.00 $ 930.00 20 30 25.8 $ 1,405.73 White Oak Road Well Water $ 35.00 $ 385.00 $ 1,085.00 30 30 31.0 $ 1,835.82 Annual Costs / Savings $ 11,745.00 $ 32,820.00 615.7 $ 34,463.96 * Schutte Park Addition is currently under the State Contract GSS13062 and is mowed every three (3) weeks for a total of eleven (11) operations in CY 2013. Total Acres To Be Mowed By City 187.25 Acres To Be Mowed Under Contract 15.22 Acres Remaining 172.03

Department of Public Works PO Box 475 Dover, Delaware 19903 Phone: (302)‐736‐7025 Fax: (302)‐736‐4217 PROPOSED MOWING CONTRACT COSTS BY DIVISION Total Contract Cost Per Season Total Staff Hours Saved Per Season Total Staff Salary Saved Per Season Location (31 Weeks) (31 Weeks) (31 Weeks) Electric Cartanza Substation $ 1,860.00 25.8 $ 1,534.80 Lebanon Substation & Lot $ 775.00 25.8 $ 1,405.73 Electric Totals $ 2,635.00 51.7 $ 2,940.54 Grounds English Village Retention Pond $ 1,550.00 31.0 $ 1,534.80 Heatherfield Fire Lane $ 775.00 25.8 $ 1,534.80 Konschak Avenue Open Space $ 1,085.00 25.8 $ 1,681.44 Mary Street Park $ 1,085.00 31.0 $ 1,681.44 Grounds Totals $ 4,495.00 113.7 $ 6,432.48 Wastewater Baltray Pump Station $ 775.00 25.8 $ 1,405.73 Heatherfield Pump Station $ 1,240.00 25.8 $ 1,534.80 Horsepond Road Pump Station $ 1,085.00 31.0 $ 1,681.44 Retreat Pump Station $ 775.00 25.8 $ 1,405.73 Schoolview Pump Station $ 1,085.00 25.8 $ 1,405.73 State College Road Pump Station $ 930.00 31.0 $ 1,681.44 Turnberry Pump Station $ 775.00 25.8 $ 1,405.73 White Oak Road Pump Station $ 930.00 25.8 $ 1,405.73 Wastewater Totals $ 7,595.00 217.0 $ 11,926.35 Water Cartanza Field Well $ 1,085.00 31.0 $ 1,681.44 Rodney Village Well $ 1,550.00 28.4 $ 1,542.56 Route 9 Well $ 1,085.00 31.0 $ 1,681.44 White Oak Road Well $ 1,085.00 31.0 $ 1,835.82 Water Totals $ 4,805.00 121.4 $ 6,741.26

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER STAFF SUBSTITUTE #1 FOR ORDINANCE #2013-03 (as amended by the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee) 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN 2 COUNCIL MET: 3 That Chapter 22 – Buildings and Building Regulations, Article XII – Vacant Buildings be 4 amended by deleting the text shown in red bold strikethrough and inserting the text in blue bold 5 italics as follows: 6 ARTICLE XII. - VACANT BUILDINGS 7 Sec. 22-400. - Purpose; applicability; definitions. 8 (a) Purpose. The purpose and intent of this article is to establish a registration and 9 identification program of vacant buildings within the city. Vacant buildings are 10 detrimental to the surrounding buildings and neighborhoods in which they exist. The 11 article is also to ensure the public health, safety and welfare insofar as they are affected 12 by vacant buildings within the city. The health, safety and welfare of the neighborhoods 13 in which vacant buildings are located are of the utmost importance to the city, as is the 14 general community character in which these vacant buildings are located. 15 (b) Applicability. The provisions of this article shall apply to all matters affecting or relating 16 to vacant buildings. Where, in this article, different sections of this Code may specify 17 different requirements, the most restrictive shall govern. 18 (c) Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have 19 the meanings ascribe to them in this subsection, except where the context clearly 20 indicates a different meaning. 21 (1) Vacant building means a building, structure, or dwelling that has been unoccupied 22 for more than three consecutive months; or a commercial tenant space greater than 23 10,000 square feet in an otherwise occupied building, that has been left 24 unoccupied for more than three consecutivemonths. residential structure or a 25 dwelling unit or commercial unit within a building that has been left unoccupied 26 or unattended for three months or more. 27 (2) Actively for sale or lease means the building is being actively marketed through a 28 licensed real estate broker or the owner who is regularly advertising the property in 29 newspapers circulated in and around Dover, it is being offered for sale or lease at a 30 cost of no more than 25 percent over market rate as determined by the city assessor,

31 and the building is in reasonable condition for sale or lease, including but not limited 32 to: no trash has collected inside or outside of the building, the utilities are functional, 33 and it is not being used as storage that is unrelated to the former use. 34 Sec. 22-401. - Monitoring, inspection and condition standards. 35 (a) The building inspector shall inspect any premises in the city for the purpose of enforcing 36 and assuring compliance with the provisions of this article. Upon request of the building 37 inspector, an owner shall provide access to all interior portions of a vacant building in 38 order to permit a complete inspection. 39 Once a building/structure/unit or residence (hereon after referred to as building) is 40 registered as a vacant building, the vacant building shall be inspected annually for as long 41 as it is considered vacant. 42 (b) The vacant building shall be secured; however the windows and other entrances shall 43 not be boarded or made opaque. the exterior building and premises shall be 44 maintained in accordance with all City of Dover Code requirements. 45 (c) The vacant building shall be in reasonable condition (all utilities shall be functional, there 46 shall be no trash or debris inside or outside the building and it shall not to be used as 47 storage that is unrelated to the former use). 48 Sec. 22-402. - Agent—Responsible person required. 49 (a) Property manager. Any owner of a vacant building, residing outside of the county, shall 50 be required to have a licensed property manager residing or having an office located in 51 the county, or a family member or other designated individual who does not manage any 52 other real estate for a fee and who resides in the county acting as a property manager. The 53 property manager, including family members and designated individuals, shall have 54 charge, care and control of the vacant building, and shall provide access to the vacant 55 building for inspection upon request by the building inspector, within 90 30 days. 56 (b) Corporate or partnership owners. Any corporation or partnership owning a vacant 57 building shall have a designated member, partner, or employee having charge, care and 58 control of the vacant building. The designated member, partner or employee shall reside 59 in or have an office located in the county, or shall be required to have a licensed property 60 manager residing or having an office located in the county, or other designated individual 61 who does not manage any other real estate for a fee, and who resides in the county, acting 62 as a property manager. The property manager, or other designated individuals shall have 63 charge, care and control of the vacant building, and shall provide access to the vacant 64 building for inspection, upon request by the building inspector, within 90 30 days. 65 Sec. 22-403. - Registration and registration fee.

66 (a) Registration of building. There are two ways to register the building as vacant. 67 (1) The owner shall register with the city not later than 30 days after any building in the 68 city becomes vacant, as defined. 69 The registration of the vacant building shall include the site address, the name of the 70 current owner or owners, current address of the owner and of all applicable owners, 71 tax parcel number, proof of insurance on the building, description of the condition of 72 the building, plans for the building (to eliminate the vacancy), the responsible person 73 or agent and their contact information and any other applicable information. If any 74 information changes the owner is responsible for informing the city of those changes 75 in a timely manner. 76 (2) The building inspector or his designee, shall investigate any property that may be 77 subject to registration. Based upon his findings, the building inspector may register 78 the property as a vacant building subject to this chapter. 79 a. Notice of registration. Within five business days of such registration, the 80 licensing and permitting office shall notify the owners of the registered 81 property by certified mail at their last known address according to the records 82 of the city and Kent County. 83 b. Registration fee. 84 (i) The annual registration fee shall be paid at the time of registration. If 85 the building inspector registers the building as vacant the fee shall be 86 due not later than 30 days after the building is registered as vacant. 87 The annual registration fee will then be due by the 31st of March on 88 the registration anniversary date every year after that as long as it 89 remains vacant. The starting point for counting a building as being 90 vacant will begin on the date of the enactment of this article [June 26, 91 2006]. 92 (ii) The registration fee will be prorated for a building when it is first 93 registered as vacant from the date it is registered until the March 94 31 annual fee is due. 95 (iii) The annual fee is as provided for in Appendix F—Fees and Fines. 96 Sec. 22-404. - Violation and penalties. 97 (a) If the registration fee is not paid within 30 days of being due, the owner shall be in 98 violation of this article. 99 (1) A lien can be assessed against the property. Such fees shall be entered in the 100 municipal lien docket