Attachment

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MARCH 12, 2012 - 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 15 LOOCKERMAN PLAZA DOVER, DELAWARE OPEN FORUM - 15 MINUTES PRIOR TO OFFICIAL MEETING (7:15 P.M.) The “Open Forum” segment is provided to extend the opportunity to the general public to share their questions, thoughts, comments, concerns, and complaints. Discussion of any item appearing on the agenda as a public hearing is prohibited during the Open Forum as an opportunity will be provided during consideration of that item. Citizen comments are limited to three (3) minutes. Council is prohibited from taking action since they are not in official session; however, they may schedule such items as regular agenda items and act upon them in the future. INVOCATION BY CHAPLAIN WALLACE DIXON PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCILMAN HUTCHISON AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS * CONSENT AGENDA Those items on the Council Agenda which are considered routine and non-controversial shall be marked with an asterisk (*) and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. * 1. Adoption of Minutes - Regular Council Meeting of February 27, 2012 - Special Council Meeting of February 27, 2012 2. Presentation - Fire Department Annual Report 3. Proclamations A. Earth Hour (Saturday, March 31, 2012 at 8:30 P.M.) B. Irish-American Heritage Month 4. Appeal of Denial of Administrative Building Permit - 149 South Governors Avenue (D&S Investment Company) 5. Public Hearings - Violations of Dangerous Building Ordinance A. Property located at 26 North Kirkwood Street, owned by Joe Burden B. Property located at 14 South Queen Street, owned by Charles E. Marshall

Council Agenda - March 12, 2012 Page 2 6. Public Hearing/Final Reading - Proposed Ordinance The First Reading of the following proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of January 23, 2012. Copies of the proposed ordinance are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers. A. Ordinance #2012-02 Amending the 2008 Comprehensive Plan by replacing Table 12-1: Land Development Plan, Map 13-1: Annexation Areas, and Map 13-2: Potential Land Use for Annexation Areas 7. Utility Committee Report - February 27, 2012 A. Dedication of Rights-of-Way and Public Infrastructure - Lexington Glen - Phase I (Committee Recommended Acceptance of the Dedication of Rights-of-Way and Public Infrastructure for Lexington Glen - Phase I to Include All of the Referenced Public Improvements, with the Stipulation That the Letter of Credit Is Received Prior to Council Action) B. Cash-In-Lieu of Pump Station Upgrades Agreement - Village of Maple Dale Senior Housing (Committee Recommended Execution of a Cash-in-Lieu Agreement with Maple Dale Country Club, Inc., with the Stipulation That No Additional Building Permits Would Be Issued Without Receipt of Payment in Full in the Amount of $36,570) * C. NAES Agreement Extension (Committee Recommended Authorizing the City Manager To: 1) Issue a Letter Advising North American Energy Services (NAES) of the City's Desire to Review and Renegotiate the Terms of the Operations and Maintenance (O & M) Agreement; and 2) Issue a Letter to Mr. Kirk Betts, Utility Attorney, to Commence Contract Negotiations) * D. Updates (Committee Action Not Required) * 8. Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report - February 27, 2012 A. Staff Recommendations - Economic Development Office (Committee Recommended That the Recommendations Regarding the (EDO) Be Returned to the City Manager for Redevelopment) B. Authorization to Purchase Virtual Server (Police Department) (Committee Recommended Approval of the Sole Vendor Purchase from Dell for a Virtual Server/Storage Array at a Cost of $42,600) C. Proposed Ordinance #2012-07 - Incentives for Redevelopment of Vacant Commercial Buildings (See Item #14-A) (Committee Recommended Adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2012-07, as Amended to Allow Redevelopment Incentives City-wide)

Council Agenda - March 12, 2012 Page 3 9. Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Report - February 29, 2012 * A. Presentation - Silver Lake to Isaacs Branch Trail Concept (Committee Action Not Required) * B. Announcement of Road Closures (Committee Action Not Required) * C. Discussion - Establishing City Emergency Operations Center (Committee Recommended Approval of Staff’s Recommendation to Establish City Hall as the City’s Designated Emergency Operations Center (EOC), with the Dover Police Department to Serve as the Backup EOC, and the Kent County 911 Center to Serve as the City’s Temporary (Alternate) Backup to the Police Department) D. Proposed Ordinances d-1. #2012-06 Creating a New Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew (See Item #14-B) (Committee Recommended Adoption of Ordinance #2012-06) d-2. #2012-08 Amending Chapter 70 - Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions (See Item #14-C) (Committee Recommended Adoption of Ordinance #2012-08) * E. Update - Dover High School Construction (Committee Action Not Required) * 10. Monthly Reports - January 2012 A. Budget E. City Planner B. Chief of Police F. Dover Fire Department C. City Assessor G. Capital Investment Plan (CIP) D. City Manager 11. Setting of Property Assessment Appeals * 12. Engagement Letter - Labor Negotiations 13. Evaluation of Bids - Library Furniture 14. First Reading - Proposed Ordinances The First Reading is offered on the following proposed ordinances. Final action by Council will take place during the Second Reading of the ordinances on April 9, 2012. Copies of all proposed ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. A. Ordinance #2012-07 with LF&A-1 - Incentives for Redevelopment of Vacant Commercial Buildings (Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee) B. Ordinance #2012-06 Creating a New Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew (Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee) C. Ordinance #2012-08 with S-1 - Amending Chapter 70 - Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions (Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee)

Council Agenda - March 12, 2012 Page 4 15. Final Reading - Proposed Ordinance #2012-03 The First Reading of the following proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of February 27, 2012. Copies of the proposed ordinance are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers. A. Ordinance #2012-03 - Related to Senior Citizen Income Exclusions 16. Council Members Announcements /tm S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Council-Agendas\2012\03-12-2012.wpd THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING The Regular Council Meeting was held on February 27, 2012 at 7:30 p.m. with Acting Council President Williams presiding in the absence of Council President Leary. Council members present were Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Russell, Dr. McGlumphy, Mr. Lynn, Mr. Bonar, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Council staff members present were Police Chief Hosfelt, Ms. Russell, Mrs. Mitchell, Mrs. Townshend, Fire Chief Fortney, Mr. Koenig, City Solicitor Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Mayor Carey was also present. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Acting Council President Williams declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council was not in official session and could not take formal action. Mr. Gerald Rocha, 523 Schooner Court, yielded his time to Pastor Gregory Gordon. Pastor Gregory Gordon, 54 S. New Street, expressed his concerns regarding the relationship of the Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP), area merchants, and the City’s Economic Development Office (EDO) and about the possibility of separating the DDP and the EDO. He felt that Mr. Ed Perez, Project Coordinator in the EDO, has played a key role in holding these entities together. Pastor Gordon explained that, as a volunteer, he had observed Mr. Perez working with and assisting merchants, shoppers, citizens, and residents of the downtown area. Pastor Gordon relayed additional concerns regarding the lack of availability of local jobs. He advised members that he is acquainted with many skilled laborers, masons, plumbers, welders, etc., all of whom remain unemployed, despite many construction projects occurring in the downtown area. He recommended that the City’s bid process be revised to consider of the number of individuals that the contractor plans to employ from the City. Pastor Gordon assured members that he has the background and employees to assist the City, explaining that the people he represents do not want a “handout;” they want to work. He commended the Police Department for improvements made to the New Street area and noted that there is much more work to be done. The invocation was given by Chaplain Dixon, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Hutchison moved for approval of the agenda as presented, seconded by Mr. Bonar and unanimously carried. Dr. McGlumphy requested that Items #7A, Review and Recommendation - Filling Critical Positions, and #7E, Request of City Manager - Employee Related Benefits/Expenses, be removed from the consent agenda. Mr. Lynn requested that Item #6A, Garrison Tract Infrastructure Financing, be removed from the consent agenda. Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the consent agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Council President Leary absent).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 2 ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2012 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 13, 2012 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Bonar, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and bore the written approval of Mayor Carey. Certificate of Congratulations - 2011 Dover Post Great Person of the Year: Herb Konowitz Mrs. Traci McDowell, City Clerk, read the following Certificate of Congratulations into the record: CERTIFICATE OF CONGRATULATIONS The Mayor and Council of the City of Dover take great pleasure in honoring Mr. Herb Konowitz for being chosen as the winner of the prestigious 2011 Dover Post Great Person of the Year Award which is awarded to individuals who have made a difference in the lives of others. We are pleased to recognize Mr. Konowitz for his past service and continued dedication to the local community. With gratitude and best wishes for the future. February 27, 2012 Mayor Carey presented the Certificate to Mr. Konowitz and relayed appreciation for the work he has done for the betterment of the community. He noted that, due to the efforts of Mr. Konowitz, many citizens have been taken off the streets, were provided mentoring, and have found jobs. Mr. Konowitz expressed his appreciation for the recognition and read the following statement into the record: “Mayor Carey, Pres. Leary, City Council Persons and friends, thank you for this award you have bestowed on me as the Great Person of our community for 2011. I am humbled standing before you with that title, but I accept it not only for me but with those persons who are helping turn around our great city of Dover and the rest of Kent County. About 5 years ago we had an emergency in this city due to extremely cold temperatures. The House of Pride, through their leader, Marian Harris, tried to accommodate the sleeping requirements of many homeless men who showed up on their doorsteps. Although the House of Pride owned numerous, and somewhat dilapidated, houses on New Street, they did not have enough space, so Marian took

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 3 it on herself and got 3 yellow school buses delivered to her properties. She had them located behind the houses, equipped them with electric heaters, and accepted homeless men for residency. Marian made these men somewhat comfortable and fed them. I don't think you know what it feels like when you are trying to stay warm in sub 20 degree weather. It didn't take long for some of the owners on New Street to complain to the City of Dover. The House of Pride was found in violation of their conditional use permits and was told to remove the buses. All of these homeless men were back on the street. God outstretched his hand and found Pastor Cox of Christ Church; Jeanine Kleimo, our present Chair of the Dover Interfaith Mission; a retired Presbyterian Minister from New York, Pastor Lee McCallum; and others. They assembled some leadership and opened the meeting room of Christ Church to these abandoned homeless men. The rest is history, about which I know some of you are familiar. I don't want to make light of it, but the men were housed in many of our churches during the winter, sometimes for a week and some for as much as a month. The outpouring of help was unbelievable. Church and synagogue members brought in food every night. The idea of a permanent shelter began to take place and approximately one and one half years ago, through the help of so many people, we were able to renovate a building that now houses 36 previously homeless men. To date, as you know, we have housed and fed over 700 homeless men, 365 days a year. Over 60% of these men have found employment. Last year we served over 12,000 plates of food with a food budget of zero. We are supported by over 47 faith community facilities by over 1000 volunteers. We are supported by local grants, a small state grant, contributions from individuals, some corporations, and, especially, some of our largest churches. Our operating budget is about $100,000 per year. We are able to do this because we have only two paid staff. The rest of us are volunteers. We would not be successful if it were not for the dedication of Mrs. Jeanine Kleimo, our Chair, last year's recipient of the Governor's Volunteer Award and, last year's Great Person Award winner for 2010; our Treasurer, Walter Bagley; our most dedicated intake manager, Cathi Kopera; and 15 other board members, including your own Sophia Russell, our newly re-elected councilwoman; and my moral supporter and wife of 53 years and a Dover Interfaith volunteer, Linda. Mayor Carlton Carey, Senators, Carper and Coons, and State Senator Brian Bushweller and Representative Daryl Scott have been right there from the beginning. I can't tell you how much support we have received from these people. This year the community spoke through the Dover Post and an election was held with the following results: Herb Konowitz, received the most votes; board member and Capital school board member, Brian Lewis, was next; our own Cathi Kopera, next; former Kent County Levy Court Commissioner, and my friend Paul Davis, next; and another board member and our assistant treasurer Kathy Lessard, next. Four out of five top vote getters were from the Dover Interfaith Mission for Housing. I ask them to rise for a round of applause.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 4 I accept this award not for me but for all of us. This is not about me. As you are aware, we have recently experienced an inordinate amount of crime in our city. I am here to tell you that this will be reined in. Through the leadership of the Greater Dover Committee we have assembled the leaders who can make decisions. We have organized a Task Force that is analyzing the area from Division Street to Kent General Hospital, from the St. Jones River to just over the railroad tracks. A survey is being conducted by the City of Dover police force, under the able leadership of Chief Hosfelt. The patrolmen are in the process of going door-to-door and distributing these surveys. As soon as they are picked up and analyzed we will proceed with making many changes to our city, such as additional lighting in key areas, and enforcing the neighborhood watch program. You are already seeing a greater concentration of our police force on the streets, and the crime has diminished. The Downtown Dover Partnership has also stepped up to the plate. These leaders are leading. The Bayard Hotel has been leveled and a modern residential and retail facility is rising from the rubble. The Dannemann building, this week, has been leveled. Some of the old Loockerman Street buildings have been purchased and are in the process of being renovated and will be ultimately occupied by businesses that are in demand by the people of Central Delaware. Land for a beautiful commons and additional parking has been purchased with a state grant. Streets around Wesley College will be closed to vehicular traffic making the campus more beautiful and safer for the students. Soon Wesley College will be renovating and occupying the Frear Building with their Nursing School. The transportation depot has been completed and has become more accessible to so many workers. The City of Dover is On The Move. However, we must continue to accommodate the 250 to 300 homeless people in our area. I envision a campus facility to house, not only the homeless men, but also the homeless women and children. There is a tremendous need for a detoxification center for those whom are addicted to alcohol and drugs. Until we address these problems we will be stymied. Plans are being formulated. The only permanent detoxification center in Delaware is located in Delaware City. One must have pull to get in. The center that was previously located in Ellendale, in Sussex County, was closed. A recent development has occurred. Those suffering from alcohol addiction, after being treated in a permanent detox center, can be given an injection of Vivatrol, monthly, to eliminate the desire for a drink. We have tested it with two of our clients, and it is successful. There is hope for the future. Can you imagine what we can accomplish with those suffering from alcoholism? The Downtown Dover Partnership and the Greater Dover Committee have the vision we need to keep Central Delaware on the move.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 5 I would like to just take a couple more minutes to tell you of the successes experienced by some of our guests: At Christmas time the employees of Vaughn Correction appeared at the Shelter and presented 30 gift cards for our men to show that DOC [Department of Corrections] appreciates the help they have been given in placing ex-offenders in a safe environment while trying to acclimate themselves back into the community. You never know who may show up at our door. Some time ago 2 long lost cousins were reunited after 15 years. One from California. The other from Florida. They were too busy getting caught up, they hardly bothered to eat. A student from Wilmington College, who is writing a paper for one of her classes, came to observe and help serve dinner. She visited with some of the men, after which she came and asked Cathi Kopera if she could come back at a later date to be a volunteer. Like most people she has this stereotype idea. Her whole idea of homeless has changed. She thought she would be nervous but instead felt very comfortable and found it to be a very warm and loving atmosphere - like a family. During the prayer circle she said," I felt like crying, the men are so grateful and appreciative of all you do for them.” One day I accompanied one of our men to a job interview, as I do, to the newly opened Chick-fil-A restaurant. The owner, Mary Johnson, conducted the interview from 10:00 a.m. to 12:45 p.m. She wanted to know everything about Daniel, and why was he incarcerated. Daniel had been a heavy equipment operator but couldn't find employment in Dover. She saw what she wanted to see and offered Daniel a job, at minimum wage, making sure the supplies are kept up for her customers. Daniel worked his way up through the organization and became one of her lead people. There is a very happy man in New York. Gabby finally got his Permanent Resident Alien Card. It was sent to the mission. Cathi called him and he wanted her to pass on to anyone who had a part in helping him get his card - a huge thank you. He had been fighting to get his visa for 10 years. Only when he got to Dover Interfaith did he get the extra help needed. He is now working in the security field, doing well in New York City. Sex offenders are the most difficult to place. These men have committed a crime but they, too, are human beings, who have paid their dues. Mark and Jesus have found employment at an orange juice plant and have worked their way up to leadership positions with numerous raises. Lastly I have to tell you about Carlos. He came to us from an agency in Georgetown. Carlos was deaf, couldn't speak, and was homeless. No one wanted to give him the time of day. We told the agency to send him to Dover. When he arrived he couldn't talk or hear. He and I communicated with the pad and pencil. Soon he learned that he could text faster than he could write. So, here he was texting and I was writing.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 6 I called Terry Murphy, President of Kent General and asked him to call Dr. Steve Cooper to get us an appointment. Within one half hour a call came in from Cooper's office, saying that someone had called him from DIMH [Dover Interfaith Mission for Housing]. We were told that this would not be necessary in the future, that they would take care of Carlos. Carlos was tested and was found to have little hearing in his left ear and no hearing in his right ear, but he was a candidate for the Cochlear Implant. I said, "Great." But Steve said he would never receive it because Carlos was on Medicaid, and they wouldn't pay for it. Dr. Cooper swabbed Carlo's throat and we were instructed to go directly to the hospital to get tested. He gave Carlos a prescription and was told to take the pills for 14 days. At the end of 13 days Carlos was sitting at a computer, searching for employment. He turned around and started talking. God had touched Carlos and all of us. Later, I took Carlos to Johns Hopkins where they gave him a loaner hearing aid. We are trying to raise funds for the purchase of a new hearing aid through the Lions Club Foundation and some of the local Rotaries. These are just a few of the stories about the men of Dover Interfaith. This award is not about me. I am proud to serve as Great Person of the Year 2011 and I thank you for your support and tonight's presentation.” Mayor Carey recognized the other individuals who were nominated for the award and relayed congratulations. PUBLIC HEARING - VIOLATION OF DANGEROUS BUILDING ORDINANCE - PROPERTY LOCATED AT 38 SOUTH NEW STREET (OWNER OF RECORD: HOUSE OF PRIDE, INC.) A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider a violation of the Dangerous Building Ordinance at 38 S. New Street, owned by House of Pride, Inc. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, stated that the property consists of a two (2) story, wood-frame dwelling. She advised members that the building is a single-family dwelling that had been divided into two (2) apartments, which is a non-conforming use according to the Zoning Ordinance. Most recently, the house had received conditional use approval for the House of Pride to use as a transitional home associated with their recovery and transitional housing program. On January 8, 2012, the property was severely damaged by fire and was subsequently condemned on January 9, 2012. Mrs. Townshend reviewed a presentation depicting the condition of the structure (Exhibit #1). Mrs. Townshend advised members that emails have been exchanged between the City Planner and Ms. Sandra Dean, attorney for the House of Pride, regarding the repair of the structure. Under the provisions of the City’s Clean Hands Ordinance (Dover Code, Chapter 1, Section 1-13 - Denial of permits or approvals for failure to comply with requirements for payment, actions, or filings), the City cannot issue a building permit to reconstruct damaged portions of the structure until all outstanding payments due to the City are paid in full. Although there are no current outstanding payments against the property, she stated that there are unpaid demolition charges for

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 7 35 N. New Street ($12,977.50) and 106 S. New Street ($21,902.75). To date, these charges have not been paid, and no application has been filed to make the repairs. Staff recommended that City Council: 1) declare this building and any accessory buildings on this property dangerous; 2) order the property repaired or demolished by March 27, 2012 by the owner or equity owner at their own risk; 3) order the Building Inspector to cause the repair or demolition of the structure if not completed by the owner within 10 days of the date established by City Council; and 4) order the City Manager, with the assistance of the City Solicitor, to cause the cost of repairs or demolition to be charged against the land on which the building exists as a municipal lien or cause such cost to be added to the tax duplicate as an assessment, or to be levied as a special tax, or to be recovered in a suit at law against the owner. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Townshend confirmed that the City would not issue permits to repair this property due to outstanding charges. She also indicated that, based on information received from the insurance company, since the cost of the repairs exceeds 75% of the value of the structure, the property could not be restored to a multi-family use and reminded members that two (2) story apartments are a non-conforming use of the property. At the request of Mr. Anderson, City Solicitor Rodriguez indicated that the City’s current Clean Hands ordinance does not provide any exceptions. In response to Mrs. Russell, Mrs. Townshend stated that although the recommendation indicates that repairs (or demolition) should be completed by March 27, 2012, if renovations are in progress and are proceeding in an adequate manner, the City would not move forward with the demolition. Acting Council President Williams declared the public hearing open. Ms. Sandra Dean, attorney representing House of Pride, stated that although there was no opposition to the property being declared dangerous, there was opposition to the proposed demolition. She explained that the two (2) demolition liens total $34,880.25, which the House of Pride will not have funds to pay until those lots are sold. The damage at 38 S. New Street was fully covered by insurance and that payment has been received and will be used to move forward with the repair and renovation of the building. The House of Pride was advised on February 27, 2012 of the requirement for the property to be renovated to a single-family dwelling. She stated that the Board of Directors would need to review the matter to determine if a conditional use application should be submitted for consideration. She indicated that the property would be renovated as a single-family dwelling. On behalf of the House of Pride, Ms. Dean requested that City Council waive the requirement that the demolition liens be paid prior to the City issuing a building permit in order to begin repairs at 38 S. New Street. There being no one else wishing to speak, Acting Council President Williams declared the public hearing closed.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 8 Mr. Anderson moved to table the matter to allow staff the opportunity to review the possibility of amending the Clean Hands ordinance to allow exceptions, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a roll call vote of five (5) yes, three (3) no (Dr. McGlumphy, Mr. Hutchison, and Mrs. Williams), and one (1) absent (Council President Leary). RESCHEDULING OF PUBLIC HEARING/FINAL READING - REZONING The First Reading of proposed Ordinance #2012-04 was accomplished during the Council Meeting of January 23, 2012 and a Public Hearing set for March 12, 2012 at 7:30 p.m. Acting Council President Williams advised members that staff requested that this item be postponed due to inadequate public notice. As a result, staff recommended that the Public Hearing/Final Reading before City Council be rescheduled for April 9, 2012. Mr. Bonar moved to reschedule the Public Hearing/Final Reading for April 9, 2012 at 7:30 p.m. for the rezoning of property located at 4 Mifflin Road, owned by Peter and Bonnie Reidy, consisting of 1.25+/- acres; property located at 24 Mifflin Road, owned by Robert Klewans and Carol Candor, consisting of 0.55+/- acres; and property located at 1510 Forrest Avenue, owned by Doreen E. Lucas, consisting of 0.41+/- acres. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT - FEBRUARY 13, 2012 The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee met on February 13, 2012 with Chairwoman Russell presiding. Accounting of Summer Program Revenues Members reviewed the Substance Abuse Program Revenue and Expense Report for Fiscal Year 2011. Mrs. Sherwanda Rachal-Speaks, Recreation Specialist, noted that the purpose of the grants received is to provide services to 100 at-risk youth who are identified as having economic and/or academic disadvantages. She also provided an overview of the purpose and function of the various programs funded through the grants. Mrs. Rachal-Speaks also noted that a Youth Connections Parent/Student Handbook is provided to all parents of participants in the after-school program. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mrs. Rachal-Speaks indicated that Youth Connections started with a grant from the State through the Delaware Prevention Network and has been in existence for 17 years. The after-school program is a licensed program that is overseen by teachers and workers who must meet specified criteria for providing care to young children, including completion of classes, background checks, and 18 hours of training each year. Mrs. Russell suggested that Mrs. Rachal-Speaks meet with Police Chief Hosfelt to assist in the development of a program being instituted by the Police Department for the youth in the downtown area.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 9 The Committee recommended acceptance of the Accounting of Summer Program Revenues as presented by staff. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Council President Leary absent). Proposed Revisions to Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Guidelines Members were reminded that during their meeting of January 9, 2012, the Parks, Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee recommended that Council approve a change to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) subgrant procedure to have applicants apply for multi-year funding that would coincide with the length of the Community Development Consolidated Plan. City Council approved the Committee’s recommendation on January 23, 2012. During the January 9, 2012 Committee meeting, it was noted that if the change to the procedure was approved, staff would prepare an amendment to the Consolidated Plan with the upcoming round of funding allocation and the program guidelines would be revised and brought to the Committee for their review. As a result, staff presented proposed revisions to the CDBG Program Guidelines which would integrate the multi-year subgrant process. Mrs. Tracey Harvey, Community Development Manager, reviewed the proposed revised CDBG Program Guidelines and noted that substantive changes were highlighted. She explained that, according to the revised guidelines, subrecipients (non-City entities) would apply for eligibility for funding on multi-year cycles and would provide the information necessary to evaluate the proposal according to the criteria in this application. City projects and programs that are eligible for funding would be specified in the Consolidated Plan and would not be required to submit a formal application. Both non-City and City applicants would be required to submit an annual funding request with a budget and program description. The revised guidelines would also allow the Director of Planning and Community Development to bring additional potential subgrantees forward to the Committee for consideration of funding during the Consolidated Plan year if special circumstances arise. Staff recommended approval of the revised CDBG Program Guidelines, as presented. In response to Mrs. Russell, Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, assured members that each funding request, including any request of the City, would be ranked by the Committee during the review process. Responding to Mr. Anderson’s concerns regarding accountability, Mrs. Townshend indicated that funding requests are reviewed each year and members are provided monthly updates; therefore, if a subgrantee does not perform as expected, the Committee can reconsider their grant funding. Elaborating, Mrs. Harvey advised members that the City also has contracts with the subrecipients; therefore, if it is found that a subrecipient is not performing well, the City has the right to terminate the contract.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 10 The Committee recommended approval of the revised Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Guidelines, as recommended by staff. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Council President Leary absent). UPDATES The following updates were provided to members Planning and Funding for New Library Ms. Marjorie Cyr, Library Director, advised members that construction of the new Dover Public Library is approximately 50% complete and the metal roof should be installed next week. Staff is finalizing the shelving and furniture listing for the building. She indicated that construction is on target for completion of the building in June or July, with a ribbon cutting to occur in September 2012. Ms. Cyr stated that the Capital Campaign has received two (2) $100,000 donations, one of which is a challenge pledge, and that the Campaign is approximately one-third of the way toward meeting the goal. She informed members that the other donation was from a local Dover family who was very specific that they did not want their gift to go toward meeting the challenge pledge in order to encourage the community to continue to contribute toward the challenge. Ms. Cyr advised members that Memorial Brick Pavers are still for sale (at a cost of $125 each) and will be placed at the Loockerman Street entrance to the library. She also advised members that a fund raising concert is scheduled for March 3, 2012 at the Wesley Chapel. In response to Mrs. Russell, Ms. Cyr indicated that two (2) tours of the new Library facility were conducted for City Council members and that Kent County Levy Court members were provided a tour earlier in the day. She stated that the tours are very important, particularly for potential donors, and if members knew of interested parties, she requested that they contact her to make tour arrangements. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Cyr stated that any donation received, with the exception of the brick paver sales, would be counted toward the challenge pledge. Ms. Cyr advised members that the Events Committee is planning a Ball to take place around the time of the ribbon cutting. The Committee is working with the Governor’s Office to schedule the ribbon cutting event for September 20, 2012. She stated that it is hoped that the Ball would become an annual event to help support the Library and that this year’s theme will be “Dancing with Da Vinci.” CDBG Program Mrs. Tracey Harvey, Community Development Manager, reported on the Status of FY 2011 CDBG Projects as of January 2012. She noted that 5:00 p.m. today is the deadline for the CDBG Applications for multi-year projects.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 11 It was noted that the report provided to members indicates an Unencumbered Balance of $0 for Connections Community Support, which should be $5,000 and that the $5,000 listed as Funds Expended should be $0. Responding to Mrs. Russell, Mrs. Harvey confirmed that the RC&D facility has moved to Milford; however, continues to provide services to City of Dover residents. In regard to the Street Program, Mrs. Harvey indicated that it is anticipated that the project will begin in the Summer of 2012. Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend explained that a water line replacement is scheduled to occur on New Street next summer and that the paving cannot begin until the water main work has been completed. Housing and Recovery Act of 2008 Funds (Neighborhood Stabilization Fund) Mrs. Tracey Harvey, Community Development Manager, reviewed the Update on the Housing and Recovery Act of 2008 Funds (Neighborhood Stabilization Program). Dover Youth Advisory Committee Mrs. Russell advised members that during the Regular Council Meeting of January 9, 2012, Council approved reappointments to the Dover Youth Advisory Committee. She stated that the members attended a recent Delaware League of Local Governments Meeting, where they were presented with certificates in recognition that this group is the only municipal youth committee in the State of Delaware. She noted that the Boys and Girls Club is attempting to create a youth committee to serve as an advisory board. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mrs. Russell stated that there are nine (9) members who serve on the Youth Advisory Committee. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for acceptance of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Council President Leary absent). UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT - FEBRUARY 13, 2012 The Utility Committee met on February 13, 2012 with Chairman Bonar presiding. Garrison Tract Infrastructure Financing Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, read the following statement into the record: “Calpine is a leading independent power producer of reliable electricity to a wide range of customers and communities. Founded in 1984, Calpine is capable of delivering approximately 28,000 megawatts of clean efficient power generation, in 20 U.S. states and Canada, with 91 operating power plants and two under construction. Calpine's fleet of natural gas-fired plants is among the youngest and cleanest in the country. The average plant age is about 12 years old, and the fleet emits fewer greenhouse gases per megawatt hour generated than any other independent power producer in the United States. Following its acquisition of Conectiv Energy in 2010, which added 19 new plants in the Eastern PJM region,

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 12 Calpine's portfolio now has significant scale in three major power markets: Texas, California and the Mid-Atlantic. With a modern, diverse and flexible fleet of state-of-the-art plants, Calpine is poised to benefit from price and volume improvements in all three areas as the country's economic recovery strengthens. Calpine is proposing to construct a 309-megawatt, energy efficient, merchant power production facility (known as the Garrison Energy Center (GEC)) on a roughly 37-acre site located at the Garrison Oak Technical Park just east of Rt. 1 off of White Oak Road. Their site development application has been submitted to the City and their project will be considered by the City's Planning Commission in March 2012. The proposed site is industrially zoned although currently undeveloped. The City and Calpine are parties to an Option to Lease agreement which would permit Calpine to lease the land for a 30-year term with four (4) five-year options. Calpine has now received the results of the PJM System Impact Study. The results of the study have identified various electrical infrastructure upgrades that will be required to inject the power into the PJM grid. The necessary upgrades to the power transmission system in the Pennsylvania area may also require an additional investment on Calpine's behalf. Pending approval by their board of directors and favorable market conditions, Calpine expects to be in a position to obtain building permits and start site construction to allow for a June 2015 commercial operation date. Both DEDO (Delaware Economic Development Office) and DNREC (Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control) are supportive of the project based on the REMI [Regional Economic Models, Inc.] study which concluded that the GEC will provide a significant Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increase, jobs creation, and lower wholesale energy costs for Delawareans. Specifically, the REMI study indicates the proposed project will create 200-250 (peak) construction jobs and a GDP increase of $25 million during construction of the facility. 15 direct jobs and 67 indirect jobs and a GDP increase of $126 million during operations of the facility will also be achieved. 121 indirect jobs and a GDP increase of $96 million will be brought about by the lower wholesale energy prices Delaware will realize once the GEC is added to the regional power generation mix. According to the analysis done by an independent energy consulting firm, during the first six (6) years of operation, the GEC will: 1) Decrease Delaware wholesale energy costs by at least $95 million. 2) Reduce residential customer bills by up to $1-1.25/month provided transmission and distribution charges are held constant. The infrastructure build-out at the Garrison Oak Technical Park will enable Delaware and the City of Dover to draw other industrial tenants, thus further expanding economic and job opportunity beyond this specific project.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 13 Based upon the projected utility demands and property improvements, the expected revenues associated with the project have been estimated as follows: City Water Revenue $1.6 million per year City Sewer Revenue $258,600 per year Land Lease Income $28,000 per year plus an annual escalator Property Taxes $150,000 (City & County Combined) Back Up Electric Power $250,000 TOTAL: $2,286,600 As we previously indicated, the City of Dover has encouraged Calpine to apply for a Delaware New Jobs Infrastructure Fund grant, which the City agreed to sign on as its public sponsor. During Calpine's discussions with the State of Delaware, representatives from State government indicated that the City of Dover must have "skin in the game" for this project to come to fruition. There are several infrastructure investments outside of the site plan boundaries that Calpine has requested third-party funding for. These investments include approximately 6 miles of a new large diameter natural gas pipeline, as well as water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and road improvements for a portion of the Garrison Oak Technical Park. The estimated cost of these infrastructure investments is $12 million. My purpose for coming before the Utility Committee tonight is to request your support for funding of these infrastructure improvements up to a target amount of $6 million dollars. The City intends to work with the State of Delaware and other entities to fund the balance of the infrastructure investments. In addition, we hope to reduce the economic outlay from the City of Dover as more detailed estimates are forged. The GEC provides a unique opportunity to lower wholesale energy costs on the supply side of the energy equation since this is an energy efficient unit. This efficiency will increase the operating value of this asset. Thank You.” Responding to Mr. Blakeman, Mr. Koenig indicated that the $6M would pay for infrastructure which is associated with the extension of a gas lateral from north of Cheswold to the Garrison Farm and GEC, as well as extending water, sewer, and road infrastructure on the Garrison property. He noted that a total of $12M of off-site infrastructure improvements is associated with water, sewer, road, and gas line construction specifically being requested and it is hoped that the remaining $6M will be obtained from the State of Delaware through grant monies. Mr. Koenig explained that the request is to offer a commitment of $6M. If this is approved by City Council, staff will distribute a letter to Calpine, which would be included in a package that Calpine is assembling for their Board and used in negotiations with the PJM grid. He stated that the commitment letter is the next step for the City and would not commit the City to pay $6M if the project does not move forward.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 14 In response to Mr. Blakeman, Mr. Koenig stated that the City may not actually provide $6M to Calpine; however, the City of Dover may contract for the $6M to build the infrastructure. The $6M investment would occur only if Calpine pulls a building permit and begins construction of the project. Mr. Koenig explained his understanding that the City of Dover would own all of the infrastructure constructed using the $12M, including the gas pipelines, water, sewer, and roads. Mr. Bonar clarified that the request is for the City to provide an authorization to commit up to $6M in contributions toward the project and that payment of the funds would not be guaranteed if the project does not move forward. Concurring, Mr. Koenig indicated that if the project does not move forward, the City would not be obligated to build any of the infrastructure. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Koenig confirmed that the perceived lack of infrastructure has been delaying the development of the Garrison Tract. He advised members that preliminary designs for infrastructure have been prepared for a field located on the Garrison Tract; however, there are no roads or water for a majority of the park. The water system was expanded from the Wild Meadows Subdivision to the location of the LS Power facility in preparation of the Garrison Center. Mr. Koenig noted that a lot could not be offered for sale there since there is no infrastructure for a finished lot. He confirmed that the Calpine project could potentially provide opportunity for other projects for the Garrison Farm and the proposed infrastructure would open 65% of the project for development once completed. Mr. Anderson questioned if fees would be involved for the gas that passes through the gas lines. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that there have not been formal discussions with Eastern Shore Natural Gas or Chesapeake Utilities in this regard; however, it is possible the City of Dover could potentially own the gas lines and then establish an agreement for operation and maintenance with either Eastern Shore Natural Gas or Chesapeake Utilities. The City could potentially receive revenue in the future, as additional gas is delivered or additional taps are made off the line. Mr. Lynn relayed concerns regarding the Calpine project in general and questioned if there have been any conversations with any representatives of Wild Meadows regarding their feelings about such a project being in close proximity. Mr. Koenig stated that it has been his experience that the residents of Wild Meadows have been very vocal in the past regarding any potential problems and that to date, he was not aware of any concerns. He was aware that a “field trip” has been planned in the near future to visit another facility similar to the proposed project. Mr. Lynn advised members that, as he requested, Calpine has reached out to the residents of the Wild Meadows Subdivision to make sure they are kept abreast of all developments. It was his opinion that Calpine has shown exemplary corporate citizenship in this regard. His concern was that the residents of Wild Meadows have not rendered their opinions regarding their support of this project. His fear was that the residents would be opposed to the construction of a plant directly behind them and, as a result, he spoke to the City’s Economic Development Director, Mr. Bill Neaton, to determine the possibility of moving the Calpine site to another location on the Garrison Tract (further from Wild Meadows). Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that this project has been in discussion for approximately two (2) years and feared that it may be too late to consider moving the location, particularly since

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 15 the location has been discussed with DNREC as well as the State Planning Office. He also noted that the site plan application has been filed with the City. The Committee recommended the endorsement of up to $6M of in-kind contributions for the infrastructure financing for the Garrison Tract. Due to recent information provided to City Council, Mr. Lynn relayed his concerns with the Committee’s recommendation. Although the City would not be obligated to provide the in-kind contributions if the project does not go forward, as a result of the information provided to City Council, he had concerns regarding the City committing such a large amount. At the request of Mr. Lynn, Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, stated that staff is in the process of gathering detailed information regarding the project. She felt that Council could move forward since there was no obligation to commit to the bond unless the project moves forward. However, staff was unsure of what the bond coverage would be at this time. Mr. Lynn indicated his concern regarding the funds being committed by the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) and felt that the matter warrants further discussion. He questioned if a delay in taking action on the part of the City would send a negative message to Calpine and the State in general. Responding, Mrs. Mitchell felt this would send a negative message; however, should members wish to table the matter, this would not suggest that Council is against the project but would just be a delay in action by Council. She noted that the matter was presented at this time due to a timetable that Calpine was attempting to meet for a meeting they had scheduled for the end of March 2012. Mr. Lynn moved to table the matter to be reconsidered as soon as practical but before the end of March 2012, thus meeting Calpine’s deadline, seconded by Mr. Hutchison. In response to Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Koenig stated that the Calpine project could move forward regardless of the solar energy facility at the property. Mr. Bonar reminded members that this project is at a very critical juncture in its discussion and felt that the new information provided to members was not a reason to table the matter. He felt that any delay by City Council would not only send a negative message to Calpine, but also to the State of Delaware, which is very interested in finding a way to bring lower utility rates to State residents. He felt strongly that Council should move forward with the bond proposal. Mr. Anderson felt that the Garrison Tract has been a waste of money, explaining that no infrastructure has been built and none of the promises made have been fulfilled. He stated that the City now has the opportunity to take action and the State is willing to pay funds that were promised several years ago. The City is being blamed for higher utility rates, which are the result of State mandates. It was his opinion that the City should take action at this time.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 16 In response to concerns of Dr. McGlumphy and Mr. Hare, Mr. Bonar stated that the $6M bond obligation would come to fruition only if the plant is built and if this does not occur, the City has absolutely no expense or commitment. He reminded members that there have been numerous opportunities for the City to act on items during the past several years and, because the City did not act, those projects came to fruition elsewhere. He stated that if the City does not act at this time, the State will not act favorably. Mr. Bonar indicated that not only will the project bring an estimated $2.3M to the City in additional revenues, it would also result in a benefit to every single resident of the State of Delaware. He stressed that this is a highly important matter and that the City should proceed. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Mitchell explained that the funding source for the bond (e.g., enterprise fund vs. general obligation bond) would depend upon what the City chooses to bond (infrastructure, purchased power, etc.). The motion to table the matter to be reconsidered as soon as practical but before the end of March 2012, thus meeting Calpine’s deadline, failed by a roll call vote of five (5) no, three (3) yes (Dr. McGlumphy, Mr. Lynn, and Mr. Hare), and one (1) absent (Council President Leary). Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation for the endorsement of up to $6M of in-kind contributions for the infrastructure financing for the Garrison Tract. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes, two(2) no (Mr. Lynn and Mr. Hare), and one (1) absent (Council President Leary). Review of Utility Related Capital Investment Plan (CIP) (Electric and Water/Wastewater) Members reviewed a Project Tracking Report, as of December 31, 2011, for the Utility (Electric and Water/Wastewater) Related Capital Investment Plan (CIP). Responding to Mr. Bonar, Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, indicated that the paving of Hazel Road should be completed in March 2012. He reminded members that a water line replacement was completed on Hazel Road and that the last street program issued included Hazel Road; therefore, curb and sidewalk repairs should be occurring. He stated that once asphalt plants open again in the Spring, the street will be paved and completed. In response to Mr. Anderson regarding the Inflow/Infiltration project, Mr. Koenig stated that although he did not have the outlay of the scale (prioritization of areas), he assured members that staff has been working diligently to maintain the schedule. He noted that the reports provided were from December and that actual construction progress may be further than what was indicated in the report. In response to Mr. Blakeman regarding the repairs on Unit #3, Mr. Koenig indicated that both preventative and long-term maintenance were being conducted on Unit #3 at the same time. The Committee recommended acceptance of the Utility Related CIP Report as presented.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 17 By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Council President Leary absent). 30-Day Update - Garrison Oak Technical Park Project Mr. Bonar referred to the first agenda item discussed by members (Garrison Tract Infrastructure Financing) and noted that it would serve as the 30-day update. Mr. Bonar moved for acceptance of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Anderson and carried, with Mr. Lynn voting no. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT - FEBRUARY 13, 2012 The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met on February 13, 2012 with Councilman Hare presiding in the absence of Chairman McGlumphy. Review and Recommendation - Filling Critical Positions During their Regular Meeting of January 23, 2012, City Council approved an amendment to the process for filling critical positions, which was approved by City Council on August 22, 2011, to specify that if a position becomes vacant that will affect public or employee safety or cause financial harm to the City, Permission to Recruit, Hiring Justification Outline, and Wage and Benefit Information for Employee Hiring and Transfers forms shall be submitted to the Legislative, Finance, and Administrative Committee, and that such requests would be forwarded to the City Manager and Controller/Treasurer for their review and recommendation prior to the Committee’s consideration. Fire Dispatcher Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed Fire Chief Jack Fortney’s request to fill one (1) vacant Fire Dispatcher position. The current vacancy was the result of the transfer/promotion of Mr. Matt Carey from a Fire Dispatcher in the Fire Department to a Communication Operator in the Police Department. The Fire Dispatcher position has been vacant since November 1, 2011, which has increased the level of stress on current staff and has the potential to degrade service if the position remains unfilled. In reviewing the Fire Chief’s hiring justification outline, Mr. Koenig stated his support of the request; however, he recommended approval with the condition that the candidate selected must pass the same background check that is required by the Police Department for Communication Operators. He reminded members that his long-term objective for both Police and Fire Department dispatch operations is to have a consolidated facility that would eventually integrate emergency dispatch functions. Mr. Koenig felt that the requirement of a background check would help lay the foundation for that transition. Mr. Koenig noted that the total cost of annual wages and benefits for the position was estimated at $51,224.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 18 Responding to Mr. Anderson, Fire Chief Fortney indicated that there were five (5) full-time dispatcher positions and one (1) part-time position in the Fire Department and that four (4) full-time positions and one (1) part-time position are currently filled. The Committee recommended approval of the request to recruit for the Fire Dispatcher, with the condition that the candidate selected to fill the position must pass the same background check that is required by the Police Department for their Communication Operators, as recommended by staff. Dr. McGlumphy explained that his request to remove the filling of critical positions from the consent agenda was due to his feeling that action by Council should be taken and voted upon separately. Dr. McGlumphy moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Anderson. Dr. McGlumphy stated that he was presenting the Committee’s recommendations; however, he would vote on the matter according to his position. Responding to comments of Mr. Hare, Mr. Hutchison suggested that members consider that there are currently 30 vacant positions within the City and that the City Manager has been charged with reviewing current operations and presenting recommendations. He felt that additional requests would be forthcoming as the City Manager continues to review and assess the operations of the City. He requested that members of Council support the City Manager in this regard. On a call for the question by Mr. Bonar, the motion to approve the Committee’s recommendation for approval of the request to recruit for the Fire Dispatcher, with the condition that the candidate selected to fill the position must pass the same background check that is required by the Police Department for their Communication Operators, as recommended by staff, was carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes, two (2) no (Dr. McGlumphy and Mrs. Williams), and one (1) absent (Council President Leary). Electric Department Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed a request from Mr. Jeremy Johnson, Interim Electric Director, to fill three (3) vacant or soon to be vacant positions within the Electric Department. He advised members that there are a total of six (6) vacant positions within this department currently. An additional vacancy is expected on or about April 1, 2012, due to an expected retirement. Due to the considerable number of vacancies in the current fiscal year, funds are available to fill the requested positions. In addition, Mr. Koenig stated that adequate funds should be available in the FY 2013 budget since he did not anticipate filling several of the vacant positions. He noted that the Departmental Budget and Support Supervisor position will be removed from the FY 2013 budget altogether. Mr. Koenig advised members that these positions were also identified by the former Public Utilities Director, Mr. Ron Lunt, as being critical to the function of the City’s electric utility. Based upon the reviews by Mr. Johnson and Mr. Lunt, he concluded that these positions are critical and must be filled. He noted that the request would upgrade the open position of Substation Relay Foreman to

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 19 an Electrical Engineering position and that the estimated budget impact of this upgrade is $18,409; however, this change would significantly expand the City’s engineering capability. Staff recommended that the Substation Relay Foreman vacancy be filled by an Electrical Engineer, which would increase efficiency because the Substation Relay Foreman’s responsibilities would be satisfied and some engineering duties could be absorbed. Additionally, staff recommended hiring two (2) Substation Technicians at the entry-level grade. This would replace the vacant Substation Technician II and prepare the department for the retirement of the other Substation Technician. In response to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Johnson stated that the Substation Department provides safety to City employees and the general public and plays a vital role in restoring power during outages. Additional functions of this department include substation maintenance, completion of capital projects, and support of the Electric Department’s daily operation. He stated that the minimum staffing level of the Substation Department is five (5) employees and that the Department is currently operating with three (3), with a Substation Technician expected to retire in April 2012. As an example of the effect on the public’s safety, Mr. Johnson explained that if a vehicle was to hit an electric pole, causing power lines to go down, and the Substation Department did not function properly and remove power from the system, those lines would remain energized and could cause danger to the public. Mr. Hare reminded members that City Council has been considering the possibility of selling the City’s utility and questioned if the proposed action should be taken at this time, since Council is waiting for responses to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Cost of Service Study and would be making a decision in this regard. Responding, Mr. Johnson explained that the request would address the City’s immediate need to continue to provide safe and reliable electric service. Concurring, Mr. Bonar felt that whether the City decides to maintain the electric system is a separate issue to be considered once a study of the entire system has been completed. In the interim, the City has the responsibility to maintain the safety and reliability of the system. In his opinion, the requested positions were critical for providing for the reliability, adequacy, and safety of the system and he urged members to support the request. The Committee recommended approval of the request to recruit an Electrical Engineer for the Electric Department, as recommended by staff. Dr. McGlumphy moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Russell and carried by a roll call vote of seven (7) yes, one (1) no (Dr. McGlumphy), and one (1) absent (Council President Leary). In regard to the anticipated retirement of a Substation Technician, Mr. Hare questioned if the employee had submitted his retirement application. Responding, Mr. Johnson stated that, although he was unsure if the paperwork had been completed, the employee had met with the Human Resources Department and indicated his intention to retire in April 2012.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 20 Mr. Hare suggested the possibility of delaying the filling of the second position until the current employee retires. Responding, Mr. Koenig explained the length of time involved in the hiring process for such a position and suggested that if members had reservations regarding hiring two (2) Substation Technician positions at this time, they could recommend filling one (1) at this time, with the stipulation that the second position would be filled upon the retirement of the Substation Technician that is anticipated in April 2012. The Committee recommended approval of the request to recruit for one (1) of the Substation Technicians for the Electric Department, with the caveat that if the current Substation Technician submits his retirement application, staff could recruit for the second Substation Technician. Dr. McGlumphy moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Bonar and carried by a roll call vote of five (5) yes, three (3) no (Mrs. Russell, Dr. McGlumphy, and Mrs. Williams), and one (1) absent (Council President Leary). United Networks of America Revised Letter of Agreement During their meeting of December 12, 2011, members considered a Letter of Agreement with United Networks of America and tabled the matter until such time that some type of accounting assurance is provided to the City. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed a revised Letter of Agreement which addressed the concerns relayed by members during their December 12, 2011 meeting. Staff recommended that staff be authorized to sign the revised Letter of Agreement with United Networks of America to begin the Health Discount Card Program. In response to Mr. Shevock, Mr. Koenig assured members that there would be no expenses for the City of Dover as a result of this program. Elaborating, Mr. Anderson indicated that the program itself provides several thousand copies of the material (brochures, cards, etc.) free of charge; however, if the City wished to promote the program beyond what is provided, those costs would be borne by the City. The Committee recommended that staff be authorized to sign the revised Letter of Agreement with United Networks of America to begin the Health Discount Card Program. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation that staff be authorized to sign the revised Letter of Agreement with United Networks of America to begin the Health Discount Card Program (Exhibit #2), seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Council President Leary absent). Staff Recommendations - Economic Development Office During their meeting of January 9, 2012, Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed a memorandum outlining a recommendation for restructuring the City’s Economic Development Office and the Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP). Members tabled the matter to allow the DDP Board to submit a response.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 21 Mr. Koenig reminded members of Recommendations #1-6 from the memorandum dated January 5, 2011. He stated that executive sessions were held to discuss qualifications and other personnel matters and the recommendations were also discussed with several members of the DDP and the DDP Board. Mr. Koenig noted that the DDP Board requested several amendments to staff’s recommendation. It was the Board’s opinion that the current Business Improvement District (BID) tax allocation would not be sufficient to cover the cost of the operation of the DDP; therefore, they requested that this tax be increased in the FY 2013 budget to provide a total transfer of $100,000. Mr. Koenig indicated that if the recommendation is implemented, the DDP would use its own funds and hire an Executive Director to manage the mission of the DDP. The DDP also felt that there would be a continued need for accounting and administrative support from the City of Dover in the near term (one (1) to three (3) years) for DDP Board and Committee Meetings. Mr. Koenig stated that the IUE Union objected to Recommendation #5, stating that it would be a violation of their contract. He noted that this matter had not been reviewed by the City’s labor attorney. Mr. Koenig felt that associated managerial rights provided in the contract would supercede the IUE’s position on this matter. In regard to concerns of a potential conflict of interest if the Economic Development Office was located in the Planning Department, Mr. Koenig stated that it could be argued that such a conflict could exist with any department. He indicated that the rationale for relocating the Economic Development Office to the Planning Department is that first contact typically occurs in that office, explaining that most individuals do not contact the City Manager’s Office for this type of information. He felt confident that moving the Economic Development Office to the Planning Department would not create a direct conflict of interest. Mr. Koenig reminded members that the purpose of his recommendations was to discuss with City Council ways to address budget gaps and maintain levels of service. He relayed his support for the desire of the DDP to hire their own Executive Director, who would concentrate solely on the projects and mission of the DDP. He noted that the original recommendation included an effective date of February 1, 2012, which has passed. In response to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Koenig stated that the DDP’s Board made a valid point regarding the need for additional funding and support beyond June 30, 2012; however, he felt that their request and his recommendation should be negotiated in this regard. Mr. Koenig indicated that his recommendations would provide a savings in the amount of $100,000 in employee costs for FY 2013 and a reduction in administrative expenses. He noted that the BID tax transfer allocation is currently $51,000; therefore, an additional $49,000 would be necessary to fill the DDP’s request of $100,000 for the next fiscal year. This would result in only a $51,000 savings for FY 2013. Mr. Anderson referred to a conversation he had with Ms. Georgeanna Windley (email previously provided to members) who indicated that she thought the program should be tweaked; however, she felt this would be counterproductive without a thorough assessment.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 22 Responding to Mr. Lynn, Mr. Koenig stated his belief that staff could not produce documentation that would outline revenues that the Economic Development Office or Economic Development Manager position produce which exceed the costs. Mr. Lynn encouraged members not to recommend placing the Office under the Planning Department, explaining his feeling that it is imperative that the integrity of Planning Department opinions regarding site plans, subdivisions, conditional use, and rezonings be protected from accusations of bias from an opposing public. He felt that the economic development professional would surely cultivate projects that would go before the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment, and City Council. If the economic development professional were placed under the Planning Director, their independence on any matter would be compromised and every decision that is opposed would be open to litigation. Mr. Lynn also felt that this restructuring would diminish the status of the economic development professional, who should have complete access to the City Manager and the Mayor without having to go through the Planning Director, and that this office should have its own letterhead, website, etc. Mr. Hare reminded members that prior to 2008, the Mayor and City Manager performed the City’s economic development function in association with Kent County, and that this approach had proven successful for many years. He did not support the expenditure of funds for a separate economic development office and suggested that if it is maintained, since half of the responsibilities would be eliminated, it should consist of only a part-time employee (25 hours per week). Disagreeing, Mr. Anderson reminded members that, prior to 2008, the City’s downtown area began to weaken, and there was an increase in crime and a flight in businesses and jobs. It was his opinion that since the City acquired its own Economic Development Office, there has been slow improvement in the downtown area and the City has received millions of dollars in investments which will begin to take effect in March, including the North Street Project, Collegian site, revitalization of the old C-Moore’s building, the Downtown charrette plan, etc. Mr. Koenig reiterated that staff’s recommendation is based on comments that were made by members of Council and the DDP. One major concern was that the City’s workforce expanded in 2008 and a revenue stream was not developed to fund the Economic Development Office. He explained that when next year’s budget is prepared, staff will be required to add a funding source for this Office and one of the reasons the recommendation was developed was due to this gap in the City’s budget. Mr. Koenig concurred with the importance of economic development for the City and explained that the question is how this need ranks in priority as the budget is developed. He stated no objection to members rejecting staff’s recommendation or tabling the matter to have staff respond to questions; however, he did not feel that providing answers to the questions would move the matter forward. The Committee recommended tabling the matter to allow staff additional time to work with the Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) on the development of a recommendation. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Council President Leary absent).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 23 Staff Recommendations - Community Development Office During their meeting of January 9, 2012, Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, reviewed a recommendation to restructure the Community Development Program and the current Community Development Manager position to allow the incumbent of this position to take on additional responsibilities outside the Community Development Program. Members tabled action to allow further discussion, possibly in executive session. Mrs. Townshend reminded members of the recommendation and noted that a discussion of personnel matters related to this issue was held in executive session. Mr. Hare stated that, after discussing this matter with other jurisdictions involved with the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, he felt that the work does not require a 40-hour week. Although he had no objections to assigning the current Community Development Manager as a Planner I, he did object to providing the employee a salary at the top of the pay scale for a Planner I since the employee does not currently qualify for the position of Planner I. Responding, Mrs. Townshend stated that staff is working to address budgetary issues while maintaining a level of service. She stated that this employee’s current salary is higher than the pay scale for a Planner I and staff’s recommendation was for the Community Development Manager to retain her current salary in an attempt to be fair to the employee. It was Mrs. Russell’s feeling that it would be unfair to punish an employee who may prove to be as valuable in the new position as she has in her current position, where she provided years of service to the City. In response to Mr. Hare, Mrs. Townshend clarified that the current Community Development Manager is not experienced in many of the primary duties of a Planner I; however, that is not an indication that the employee is not qualified. It was her opinion that the employee is qualified to serve as a Planner and, although she will need training, this is necessary even for individuals with a planning background. She noted that the recommendation is to merge the vacant Planner and CDBG positions and that the previous Planner (who earned approximately $40,000 per year) did not have a CDBG background. She explained the importance of properly managing the CDBG program and keeping it in line with Federal requirements. The Committee recommended that staff be authorized to restructure the Community Development Program and the current Community Development Manager position to allow for this position to take on additional responsibilities outside the Community Development Program, as recommended by staff. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Council President Leary absent). Proposed Ordinance #2012-03 - Related to Senior Citizen Income Exclusions During their meeting of January 23, 2012, members considered Proposed Ordinance #2012-03, which would amend Chapter 102 - Taxation, Article VI - Exemptions; Board of Assessment Appeals, Section 102-183 - Tax Exemption for Senior Citizens by replacing the language “federal

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 24 civil service retirement” with “Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS)” and changing the computation of the property owner’s entitlement for the deduction from a dollar amount to a percentage of the Social Security maximum benefit. After much discussion, the Committee referred the matter back to staff for clarification of the language. Ms. Cheryl Russell, City Assessor, stated that staff considered amending the language of the proposed ordinance title to specify that the senior citizen abatement was for low-income senior citizens, which was referred to the City Solicitor for review. She advised members that the City Solicitor recommended not changing the title of the ordinance. She explained that the authority for this exemption comes from 22 Del C §1001, “Exemptions from Municipal Taxation on Real Property For Persons 65 Years of Age or Older.” Staff recommended adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2012-03 amending Section 102-183 (b)(3) to update the language to specify Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) as the type of Civil Service Retirement to be excluded and also to strike out the dollar amount for the maximum amount allowed for the deduction from income. Staff also recommended changing the wording in Line 48 for clarification (eliminating “Appeals from”). The Committee recommended adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2012-03, as recommended by staff. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Council President Leary absent). (The First Reading of Ordinance #2012-03 will take place during the latter part of the meeting.) Request of City Manager - Employment Related Benefits/Expenses Members reviewed a request from Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, to consider approval of a $400 car allowance rather than the use of a City vehicle and a $100 special cell phone allowance rather than the use of a City cell phone. He provided members with support documentation for each of the requests. The Committee recommended approval of the City Manager’s request for a $400 car allowance and $100 special cell phone allowance. Dr. McGlumphy moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hutchison. Mr. Anderson requested the division of the question to allow for separate motions. Mr. Anderson felt that the car allowance would ultimately save the City money; however, with regard to the cell phone allowance, since the City has a policy regarding the use of cell phones, he did not feel that an exception should be made for the City Manager. The motion to approve the City Manager’s request for a $400 car allowance was carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes, two (2) no (Dr. McGlumphy and Mr. Lynn), and one (1) absent (Council President Leary).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 25 The motion to approve the City Manager’s request for a $100 special cell phone allowance was carried by a roll call vote of five (5) yes, three (3) no (Mr. Anderson, Dr. McGlumphy, and Mr. Lynn), and one (1) absent (Council President Leary). Dr. McGlumphy moved for acceptance of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Bonar and unanimously carried. EVALUATION OF BIDS - LIBRARY FURNITURE Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed a request for the purchase of furniture for the new Library and advised members that construction of the new Library is 50% complete and is progressing on schedule, with a targeted completion date in June 2012 and a potential opening date in September 2012. He explained that lead time on the order and delivery of furniture is necessary so that shelving may be installed by EDiS to meet the construction schedule and deadlines. Mr. Koenig indicated that staff has reviewed and recommended approval of the purchase from Diversified Storage Solutions through State contract, in accordance with the City of Dover Purchasing Policy. He noted that the total amount budgeted for furniture and shelving is $703,000 and the purchase request totals $292,738, specifically for shelving, panels, and countertops. He stated that the balance of the furniture to be purchased is currently being reviewed by staff and will be brought forward to Council in March. Staff recommended approval of the purchase of the shelving, end panels, and countertops in the amount of $292,738. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Koenig stated that these items were not included in the City’s contract with EdiS; however, he assured members that the purchase was included as a line item in the original project budget. In response to Mrs. Williams, Mrs. Mitchell confirmed that the expenditure is part of the $3.5M included in the City’s budget for the project. Mr. Anderson moved for approval of staff’s recommendation to purchase shelving, end panels, and countertops in the amount of $292,738, seconded by Mr. Hare and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. PROPOSED CANCELLATION OF COUNCIL AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS FALLING IN THE WEEK OF THE FOURTH MONDAY OF EVERY THIRD MONTH (MARCH, JUNE, SEPTEMBER, AND DECEMBER) Due to short staffing related to the hiring freeze and current budgetary constraints that the City is facing, some members of Council suggested holding fewer City Council and Committee meetings. Many of the recent meetings have had short agendas and it was felt that those items could be combined into one meeting, thereby providing additional time for day-to-day operations for those departments that are short-staffed.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 26 As a result, Council President Leary recommended the cancellation of the Utility Committee, Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee, and City Council meetings falling in the week of the fourth Monday of every third month (March, June, September, and December) and moving the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meetings falling in those months to the week of the second Monday of that same month. By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of Council President Leary’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Council President Leary absent). SELECTION OF POLLING PLACES FOR 2012 REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION Members were advised that the City of Dover Election Board met on February 23, 2012 and recommended that the Elk’s Lodge at 200 Salisbury Road be utilized as the polling place for the First District and the Dover Park Recreation Center at 1210 White Oak Road be utilized as the polling place for the Third District for the Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, April 17, 2012. Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Election Board’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Lynn and unanimously carried. APPOINTMENT RECOMMENDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT LEARY - PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE - DAVID L. BONAR (TO FILL UNEXPIRED TERM OF WILLIAM F. HARE - TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 14, 2012) Council President Leary recommended the appointment of Councilman David L. Bonar to serve on the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee for a term to expire May 14, 2012 (to fill the unexpired term of William F. Hare). By consent agenda, Mr. Bonar moved for approval of Council President Leary’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hutchison and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Council President Leary absent). FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2012-03 Council President Williams reminded the public that copies of proposed ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. Final action by Council on the proposed ordinance will take place during the Council Meeting of March 12, 2012. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2012-03 AMENDING CHAPTER 102 - TAXATION, ARTICLE VI - EXEMPTIONS; BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, SECTION 102-183 - TAX EXEMPTION FOR SENIOR CITIZENS

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 27 COUNCIL MEMBERS ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Anderson announced that on February 29, 2012, Westminster Village will introduce “Masterpiece Living,” which will provide information on ways to live in older age successfully. It will be a comprehensive approach and open to the public. Mrs. Russell advised members that the Boys and Girls Club at Simon Circle will begin a youth basketball program from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on February 24, 2012 and that volunteers are needed. The program is sponsored by the Drug and Alcohol Awareness Program and includes an educational component. Mr. Hare stated that the Police Department will hold a Promotion Ceremony on February 28, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. and encouraged members of Council to attend to show their support. In response to Mr. Hare regarding the possibility of changing the 2:00 p.m. meeting time set for the Council Retreat on March 30, 2012, Mrs. Williams suggested that this matter be reviewed with the City Clerk’s Office. Mr. Bonar moved to adjourn into executive session (which was recessed earlier in the evening), seconded by Mrs. Russell and unanimously carried. Meeting Adjourned at 8:55 P.M. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All orders, ordinances, and resolutions adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of February 27, 2012, are hereby approved. CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. MAYOR /TM/jg S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Council-Minutes\2012\02-27-2012 COUNCIL.wpd Exhibits Attached to Original Minutes and File Copy Exhibit #1 - Presentation - Violation of Dangerous Building Ordinance - 38 South New Street Exhibit #2 - Revised Letter of Agreement with United Networks of America

SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING A Special Council Meeting was held on February 27, 2012 at 4:50 p.m. with Councilwoman Williams presiding in the absence of Council President Leary. Members present were Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Russell, Dr. McGlumphy, Mr. Lynn, Mr. Bonar, Mr. Hare, and Mr. Hutchison. Council staff members present were Mr. Koenig, Mrs. Mitchell, Mr. Johnson, and Mrs. McDowell. Mayor Carey was also present. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS The agenda was approved by unanimous consent. Mr. Bonar moved to recess into executive session to discuss legal matters, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. Meeting recessed at 5:33 p.m., reconvened at 8:55 p.m., and adjourned at 9:30 p.m. CALPINE PROJECT UPDATE During the executive session, Mr. Kirk Betts, Betts & Holt, LLP, provided an update on the Calpine project. Mr. Bonar moved to retain Mr. Betts as legal counsel for the Calpine Project, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Mr. Hare moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Meeting Adjourned at 9:31 P.M. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All orders, ordinances, and resolutions adopted by City Council during their Special Meeting of February 27, 2012, are hereby approved. CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. MAYOR /TM S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Council-Minutes\2012\02-27-2012 SPECIAL.wpd

2011 ANNUAL REPORT

Alarms by Time of Day 00:00 -00:59 33 01:00 -01:59 20 02:00 -02:59 21 03:00 -03:59 21 04:00 -04:59 26 05:00 -05:59 15 06:00 -06:59 21 07:00 -07:59 29 08:00 -08:59 51 09:00 - 09:59 52 10:00 - 10:59 48 11:00 - 11:59 62 12:00 - 12:59 49 13:00 - 13:59 47 14:00 - 14:59 64 15:00 - 15:59 51 16:00 - 16:59 46 17:00 - 17:59 53 18:00 - 18:59 62 19:00 - 19:59 61 20:00 - 20:59 56 21:00 - 21:59 65 22:00 - 22:59 40 23:00 - 23:59 43 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Manpower Hours By Situation Found Special Incident 14 Severe Weather 94 False Alarm 1963 Good Intent Call 559 Service Call 1178 Hazardous Condition 1264 Rescue & Emergency 330 Overpressure 49 Fire 1889 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

ALARMS BY MONTH 150 133 91 89 89 98 95 100 84 81 72 66 69 69 50 0 2011 CALLS BY FIRE DEPARTMENT 1200 1000 800 600 1028 400 AMOUNT OF 200 590 518 283 CALLS 0

100’ rear mount foot aluminum ladder with a 12 foot jack spread, 500 gallons of water, 1,500 G.P.M. pump, 900’ 5" supply line, 300’ 3" hose, (3) 200' 1 3/4 pre- connects, Full complement of engine/truck company equipment, Equipment for high angle, confined space, water and ice rescues

On November 01, 2011 at 1209, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched for a motor vehicle collision (MVC) with a subject trapped at the intersection of Scarborough Rd and N. Dupont Hwy. Dover 16, Deputy Chief West, arrived first on scene in the Command Car to find a rollback truck on its side with a vehicle on the rollback portion of the truck. The subject inside the cab was egress challenged and could not exit the vehicle under his own power. Additional units arrived on scene and were directed to stabilize the vehicles, and remove the windshield of rollback to gain access to the driver. The subject was extricated and transported to the local Emergency Department for evaluation. On October 28, 2011 at 2311, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched to 39 S. Queen St for a working house fire. E4 under the direction of Capt. Hall was first on scene and found heavy fire showing from division 1 and 2 on the Alpha side of a 2-story single family dwelling. E4 secured a water source and advanced a 1-3/4” attack line through the front door of the residence. Crews encountered heavy fire conditions throughout the structure. L1 arrived on scene and advanced a second 1-3/4” attack line. Additional crews arrived on scene and performed search and rescue, ventilation and extensive overhaul.

On October 27, 2011 at 2125, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched to 726 Slaughter St. for a working house fire. E4 under the direction of Asst Chief Carey was first on scene and found fire showing from the Alpha side of a 2-story single family dwelling. E4 secured a water source and advanced an 1-3/4” attack line through the front door of the residence. Crews found two rooms fully involved. L1 arrived on scene and performed horizontal ventilation on all four sides of the structure. Additional crews arrived on scene and performed search and rescue and overhaul. On October 25, 2011 at 2256, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched to 1661 S. Dupont Hwy for a ladder company assist with the Camden-Wyoming VFC for a working building fire. Capt Knight arrived on scene with L2 and was directed to place the aerial in service to vent the roof. E3 arrived on scene as well and crews from both units made several vent holes in the roof of the structure. Engine crews from CWVFC extinguished the fire within.

On October 25, 2011 at 2016, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched for a motor vehicle collision (MVC) with a subject trapped at the intersection of Leipsic Rd and Persimmon Tree Lane. Dover E4, under the direction of Chief Fortney, was first on scene and found two vehicles involved in an apparent head-on collision with a subject entrapped. Crews quickly stabilized the vehicle and removed the roof/doors to expose the subject. The subject was extricated and transported to the local Emergency Department along with the driver of the other vehicle. On September 21, 2011 at 1836, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched to 25 N. Kirkwood St. for a working house fire. Chief Fortney arrived first on scene in the Command car to find a 2-story single family dwelling with heavy fire showing. E4 arrived on scene, secured a water source and advanced an 1-3/4” attack line through the side door of the residence. Crews encountered heavy fire conditions on the first floor. L1 arrived on scene and was directed to advance a second attack line into the structure for suppression. L1’s crew advanced a second 1-3/4” attack line through the front to assist with fire attack. R1 arrived on scene and was directed to assist in suppression efforts. Due to the deteriorating conditions of the second floor and attic, Chief Fortney ordered an evacuation of the structure and ordered an exterior attack. After the bulk of the fire was knocked down, crews again advanced into the structure to perform search and rescue to extinguish any hot spots. Both primary and secondary searches proved negative. Crews remained on scene performing extensive overhaul.

On August 19, 2011 at 1301, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched to 255 S. Governors Blvd for a working house fire. E4, under the direction of Capt. Hall, was first on scene and found fire showing from the “C” side of a 1-story single family dwelling. E4 secured a water source and advanced an 1-3/4” attack line through the front door of the residence. Crews found two rooms fully involved. E41-6 arrived on scene and advanced a second 1-3/4” attack line to assist with fire attack. L2 arrived on scene, laddered the structure and performed vertical ventilation. Additional crews arrived on scene and secured utilities and assisted in overhaul and salvage. Primary and secondary searches proved negative On July 17, 2011 at 0621, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched to 114 Spruance Rd for a working house fire. E4, under the direction of Deputy Chief West, was first on scene and found fire showing from the “A” side of a 1-story single family dwelling. E4 secured a water source and advanced an 1-3/4” attack line through the front door of the residence. Crews found the bulk of the fire to be above them in the attic. E3 arrived on scene and advanced a second 1-3/4” attack line into the residence. L2 arrived on scene, performed horizontal ventilation and secured the utilities. E54-5 assisted with fire attack and extensive overhaul. R43 provided the RIT. Primary and secondary searches were conducted and two pet birds were removed from the residence in apparent good health.

On June 7, 2011 at 1248, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched for a reported mulch fire in front of a residence. The call was quickly upgraded to a working alarm when the local communications centers began taking numerous calls of the house now on fire. Duty Officer Capt. Hall was first to arrive on scene to find a 2-story drug treatment center with heavy fire and smoke conditions on the “A” side of the structure. On May 23, 2011 at 1859, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched to 70 Mifflin Road for a Working House fire. E3 under the direction of Past Chief Bashista was first on scene and found fire showing from the Charlie side of a 1-story single family dwelling. E3 secured a water source and advanced an 1-3/4” attack line through the front door of the residence. Crews found two rooms fully involved with extension into attic and the rear of the structure. E4 arrived on scene; Past Chief Bashista passed Command to Assistant Chief Carey. E4's crew advanced a second 1-3/4” attack line through the front to assist with fire attack. L2 arrived on scene, laddered the structure and performed vertical ventilation. E41-3 assisted with fire attack and extinguished the attic. E6 arrived on scene and advanced a 300’ 1-3/4” attack line to the rear of the structure. Medical personnel on scene provided patient care to the homeowner who was home at the fires onset

On February 9, 2011 at 0238, the Dover Fire Department was dispatched for a working house fire at 455 New Castle Ave. E4, under the direction of Chief Fortney, was first on scene and found heavy smoke billowing from a “middle of the row”, row home. E4’s crew established a water supply and advanced a 1-3/4” attack line into the residence through the front door. L2 arrived on scene and performed an initial search and advanced a second 1-3/4” attack line into the residence. E54-5 and E6 arrived on scene minutes afterwards and set up the RIT and the aerial. E3 and E41-3 arrived on scene and were directed to perform searches in the exposure residences and a secondary search in the fire residence. All searches proved negative. Interior crews encountered heavy fire conditions and also had a large volume of fire above in the attic. As crews were inside pulling the ceiling to gain access to the attic space, the fire vented through the roof and sections began to sag. At 0254, Chief Fortney directed the removal of all personnel from the residence and the evacuation tones were sounded. After a quick par check was complete, crews placed the aerial in service and knocked down the bulk of the remaining fire. When deemed safe, crews again entered the structure and placed hand-lines back in service to extinguish a few hot spots and perform a lengthy over haul. The crews worked in adverse conditions in bitter cold with the temperature dropping to 8F with the wind-chill. Due to an aggressive attack, the fire was contained to the residence of origin and there was no extension into the adjacent residences

Hurricane Irene Saturday, August 27, 2011 The Dover Fire Department responded to almost 50 storm related calls in just over a 12 hour time frame in support of Hurricane Irene efforts. Volunteer crews fully staffed 4 engines, 2 ladder trucks, a brush piece, a utility piece and a marine unit for almost 24 hours. All crews were centrally located at the HQ station downtown and responded to a myriad of calls ranging from water rescues to hazardous flooding conditions at the local hospital. The Department is very proud of the herculean effort that was put forth by its members.

FIRE PREVENTION - IN OCTOBER, NATIONAL NIGHT OUT - ON AUG 2ND, DURING FIRE PREVENTION WEEK, THE THE DOVER FIRE DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT GOES TO LOCAL SCHOOLS PARTICIPATED IN THE NATIONAL THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF DOVER TO NIGHT OUT EVENT HELD AT THE DOVER EDUCATE THE CHILDREN ON VARIOUS TARGET. THE EVENT WAS SPONSORED ISSUES. THE MEMBERS PUT ON A BY DOVER POLICE DEPARTMENT AND DEMONSTRATION WITH A FIREFIGHTER, TARGET. NATIONAL NIGHT OUT IS AN DRESSED AS THEY WOULD BE ON A FIRE OPPORTUNITY TO HEIGHTEN SCENE, TO SHOW THE CHILDREN HOW AWARENESS OF DRUG AND CRIME IMPORTANT IT IS TO NOT BE AFRAID OF PREVENTION EFFORTS, STRENGTHEN A FIREFIGHTER. THE CHILDREN ARE NEIGHBORHOOD SPIRIT AND POLICE ABLE TO SEE WHAT THE FIREFIGHTER COMMUNITY RELATIONS. WOULD LOOK LIKE AND HOW THEY WOULD SOUND IN THE EVENT OF AN ACTUAL EMERGENCY.

Big Event Weekend for the DFD Saturday, September 17, 2011 The Dover Fire Department had a busy event weekend. It started Friday night with the Backyard Burner event at Bubba’s Rock Shak. The evening was a big success again. Patrons enjoyed Kristen and the Noise and socializing with State firefighters. The following morning was the first annual DFD 5K. Over 80 runners participated. Ages ranged from youth through senior citizens. Along with the 5K was a push-up competition sponsored by the Punch Kettle Bell Gym and a hot wing eating competition sponsored by the Dover Buffalo Wild Wings. The DFD would like to thank the many sponsors who made these events such a great success. Special thanks go out to the Little Creek VFC for the use of their EMS gator. Members also had our Engine 2 and antique Engine 8 judged in the DVFA Conference. The apparatus were awarded 2nd and 8th place respectively in their categories. In the afternoon, the membership participated in the DVFA Conference parade followed shortly after by a crab feast put on by with the Little Creek Fire Company. None of these events would have been possible without the stand-by crews we had in our station from Friday afternoon until Sunday morning.

Charlie Boyer, Fireman of the Year Terry Whitham, Chief's Award Ronald Rhodes, Firefighter of the Year Roger Wolfgang John L. LeCompte, II. Kevin Lane Ronald Rhodes James Naylor Trey Small Sabrina Naylor Matthew Carey Jake Shepherd Tom Trader

1028 Incidents responded to….. Thousands of children taught about fire safety and prevention…… Countless hours of training to become better , more experienced firefighters….. Nights, weekends, holidays away from families…... The above represents the dedication of the VOLUNTEERS from the Dover Fire Department!!

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: City Council DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Planning & Inspections DATE SUBMITTED: March 2, 2012 PREPARED BY: Ann Marie Townshend, AICP, Director of Planning and Community Development SUBJECT: 26 North Kirkwood Street, Dover, Delaware – Violation of Dangerous Building Ordinance REFERENCE: Chapter 22, Article XI – Dangerous Buildings, Sec. 22-385 - Hearing before Council and Chapter 22, Article XI - Dangerous Buildings Case #10-3256 RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: Scott D. Koenig, P.E., City Manager; Donna Mitchell, City Controller/Treasurer EXHIBITS: PowerPoint Presentation and File Photos to be presented at the Council meeting. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Preliminary estimate is $10,000-15,000. AMOUNT BUDGETED: $100,000 Budgeted for all demolitions Citywide in the FY-2012 Budget $17,453.16 remains in line item. FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): 110-1600-534-30-33 – Page 155 in the FY 2012 Operating Budget. TIMETABLE: As soon as possible. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Declare this building on this property dangerous. 2. Order the property repaired or demolished by April 12, 2012 by the owner or equity owner at their own risk. 3. Order the Building Inspector to cause the repair or demolition of the structures if not completed by the owner within 10 days of the date established by City Council. 4. Order the City Manager with the assistance of the City Solicitor to cause the cost of repairs or demolition to be charged against the land on which the building exists as a municipal lien or cause such cost to be added to the tax duplicate as an assessment, or to be levied as a special tax, or to be recovered in a suit at law against the owner. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The property is owned by Joe Burden, Sr. The property consists of a two-story wood frame dwelling. The dwelling was condemned as unfit for human habitation on 11/18/2010 due to the degree of damage to the structure from a fire that occurred on the night of 11/17/2010. On 5/20/2011 the City staff registered the structure as a vacant building, no fees have been paid. Mr. Burden attempted to obtain a renovation permit on 12/9/2011 but was denied by the City until all taxes, fees, citations and other outstanding charges due to the City of Dover are paid in full. Currently, the structure is still vacant, with no utilities and in a serious state of disrepair.

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: City Council DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Planning & Inspections DATE SUBMITTED: March 2, 2012 PREPARED BY: Ann Marie Townshend, AICP, Director of Planning and Community Development SUBJECT: 14 South Queen Street, Dover, Delaware – Violation of Dangerous Building Ordinance REFERENCE: Chapter 22, Article XI – Dangerous Buildings, Sec. 22-385 - Hearing before Council and Chapter 22, Article XI - Dangerous Buildings Case # 08-3393 & 08-3455 RELATED PROJECT: N/A APPROVALS: Scott D. Koenig, P.E., City Manager; Donna Mitchell, City Controller/Treasurer EXHIBITS: PowerPoint Presentation and File Photos to be presented at the Council meeting. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Preliminary estimate is $10,000-15,000. AMOUNT BUDGETED: $100,000 Budgeted for all demolitions Citywide in the FY-2012 Budget; $17,453.16 remains in line item. FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): 110-1600-534-30-33 – Page 155 in the FY 2012 Operating Budget. TIMETABLE: As soon as possible. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Declare this building on this property dangerous. 2. Order the property repaired or demolished by April 12, 2012 by the owner or equity owner at their own risk. 3. Order the Building Inspector to cause the repair or demolition of the structures if not completed by the owner within 10 days of the date established by City Council. 4. Order the City Manager with the assistance of the City Solicitor to cause the cost of repairs or demolition to be charged against the land on which the building exists as a municipal lien or cause such cost to be added to the tax duplicate as an assessment, or to be levied as a special tax, or to be recovered in a suit at law against the owner. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The property is owned by Charles E. Marshall. The property consists of a two-story wood frame dwelling. On 9/12/2008, the property was posted for not having any electrical service, and then condemned for unfit for habitation on 9/15/2008 due to no utilities and the degree to which the property was in disrepair. There were numerous broken windows, missing siding, missing gutters, unsecurable rear door, and a collapsed rear roof. The building was staff registered as a vacant building on 2/12/2009, and the owner was ordered to secure the building. No vacant ordiance fees have been paid. Staff was preparing to present this building to Council as a dangerous building on 11/22/2010, when the owner requested additional time to make repairs to the structure. The owner obtained the necessary permit on 12/1/2010, but after 6 months, the permit expired with little work done to the home. What work was done, was not completed to code specifications. The home is currently still vacant, with no utilities, in a serious state of disrepair, and the rear utility room and part of the rear 2nd story wall are still open to the elements.

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Public Hearing before the Dover City Council March 12, 2012 Proposed Amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan: A summary of the proposed amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan follows. A. Land Development Plan Amendment – Change of land use classification for three parcels located at the southwest corner of Forrest Avenue (Route 8) and Mifflin Road from Residential Low Density to Commercial. This amendment has been requested by the affected property owners, in conjunction with a rezoning request, as specified in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. B. Annexation Plan Amendment – Addition of property south of South Little Creek Road and east of Horsepond Road as “Category 2 Annexation Area” with a land use classification of Agriculture. This amendment has been requested by the affected property owner in anticipation of developing the property as a solar power generation facility. Planning Commission Recommendation: Following public hearings before the Planning Commission on February 21, 2012 (a separate hearing on each proposed amendment), the Planning Commission passed the following motions: A. Mr. Ambruso moved to forward recommendation to City Council to deny MI-12-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2012 Part A- request to change from Residential Low-Density to Commercial, seconded by Mr. Friedman and the motion was unanimously carried 6-0 with Mr. Holt, Mr. Nichols and Colonel Welsh absent. B. Mr. Ambruso moved to forward recommendation to City Council of approval for MI-12-01 Part B- request to take into the Annexation Area of Map 13-1 and 13-2 as a Category 2 with the Land Use Classification of Agriculture, seconded by Mr. Baldwin and the motion was unanimously carried 5-0 with Mr. Holt, Mr. Nichols, Colonel Welsh and Mr. Friedman absent. Ordinance Number: 2012-02 File Number: MI-12-01

MI-12-01 – 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Report to City Council March 12, 2012 Page 2 Project Background: The 2008 Comprehensive Plan was adopted by City Council on February 9, 2008, and subsequently amended on November 23, 2009, (in conjunction with the 2009 Comprehensive Rezoning Project), amended on March 14, 2011, and amended on April 11, 2011. As adopted, the 2008 Comprehensive Plan sets forth a process by which the Comprehensive Plan can be amended on an annual basis. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan can be initiated by staff or requested by members of the public. For amendments to the Comprehensive Plan that involve rezoning of property, the requests are processed concurrently. The process to amend the Comprehensive Plan is detailed in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 15: Implementation, specifically on pages 183 and 184 of the Plan. This process involves review of the proposed amendments through PLUS (Preliminary Land Use Services). These Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2012 were presented at the January 25, 2012 PLUS review meeting and PLUS review comments are attached to this report. The proposed amendments are detailed below and represented in the attachments. A. Land Use Classification Change from Residential Low Density (Map 12-1) This proposed amendment is an applicant-initiated amendment, where three property owners are requesting a change to the Land Use Classification for three contiguous properties located at the corner of Mifflin Road and Forrest Avenue (Delaware Route 8). The request is that Land Use Classification be changed from Residential Low Density to Commercial as depicted on Map 12-1: Land Development Plan. This request is associated with the rezoning application for the same properties, identified as Z-12-01 Lands of Reidy, Lucas and Klewans at southwest corner of Route 8 and Mifflin Road. The properties involved are as follows: • 4 Mifflin Road, ED-05-076.09-01-11.00-000 • 24 Mifflin Road, ED-05-076.09-01-12.00-000 • 1510 Forrest Avenue, ED-05-076.06-01-08.00-000 According to the applicant: As these parcels are located in a very commercialized area and will provide convenient services and job opportunities for the community in addition to providing increased tax revenue for the city. Regarding Commercial uses, in Chapter 12 – Land Development, page 151 and 152, the 2008 Comprehensive Plan recommends the following: The Delaware Route 8 corridor continues to be an area subject to increasing commercial development pressure. This area is subject to the Corridor Overlay Zone (COZ-1), which has ensured that the development of this corridor does not mirror that of Route 13. The Comprehensive Land Development Plan recommends that Route 8, west of the railroad tracks continue to develop as either commercial or professional offices. With the requirements of the Corridor Overlay Zone as well as implementation of the Route 8

MI-12-01 – 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Report to City Council March 12, 2012 Page 3 study performed by the Dover/Kent County MPO, efforts to provide cross access easements and a potential service road will be an essential component to the further development of the corridor. The subject properties are located at the southwest corner of Mifflin Road and Forrest Avenue (Delaware Route 8). The properties to the north across Forrest Avenue consist of a residential condominium complex. The properties to the east across Mifflin Road are commercial in nature. The property to the south is residential property along Mifflin Road. The property immediately west along Forrest Avenue is in unincorporated Kent County and remains agricultural in use. When the Planning Office developed the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, the initial staff recommendation was to change this corner to reflect a Land Use Classification of Commercial. Following public testimony at the public hearing held by City Council regarding the Comprehensive Plan, City Council unanimously voted to change the Land Use Classification from the proposed Commercial use to Residential Low Density use. This change was reflected in the final 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Excerpts of the public testimony regarding this application are attached. B. Annexation Plan Amendment (Map 13-1 & Map 13-2) This proposed amendment is an applicant-initiated amendment, where the applicant is requesting that the annexation area be expanded in the southeast side of the City, south of South Little Creek Road and east of Horsepond Road. The request is for a portion of parcel ED-00-078.00- 01-25.00-000 in the ownership of Eastern Woodlands Holdings, LLC. The request would have this area added as a Category 2 Annexation Area on Map 13-1: Annexation Areas with a Land Use Classification of Agriculture on Map 13-2: Potential Land Use for Annexation Areas. According to the applicant: The petition for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is to include the subject parcel with the Category 2 Annexation area. The property is zoned AC within Kent County. The owner would be proposing to keep the zoning as A- Agriculture within the City of Dover for the purpose of constructing a solar energy farm. The proposal is consistent with Chapter 13 of the City of Dover Comprehensive Plan goals to “Create an environment for long term investment in Dover focusing on green technology and entrepreneurial business.” The developer will be making a significant investment in the solar farm to provide a longer term green energy project The project would benefit the citizens of Dover and Delaware. The City of Dover owns their own electric utility which would benefit from the solar farm. The property is bounded on the east by parcels zoned AC within Kent County. The property is bounded on the west by parcels within the City of Dover with C-3 - Service Commercial, M – Manufacturing and IO – Institutional Office zoning districts. The proposed Agricultural zone and solar farm use would be consistent in use and activity. The solar farm would not be a significant generator of activity or traffic, similar to standard agriculture.

MI-12-01 – 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Report to City Council March 12, 2012 Page 4 The subject area is located east of Delaware Route 1, which is an area where State, County and City policies have not supported large scale development. However, the property is also located adjacent to parcels within the City and within the Category 1 Annexation areas, and the proposed land use classification would not permit large scale or high intensity development. Recommendations of the Planning Commission: A. Land Use Classification Change from Residential Low Density (Map 12-1) From the language in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and analysis of the Route 8 corridor, which is largely commercial, the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan appears to be consistent with the development of the area and the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. However, there was significant public opposition to a similar proposal in 2009. The character of the adjoining residential area remains the same as it was in 2009, as does the commercial character of the Route 8 corridor. Staff submitted a recommendation to the Planning Commission to support the change to a Land Use Classification of Commercial for these three properties, but to recommend that a less intense zone be applied to the subject properties than the requested C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone). These specifics regarding the zoning recommendation will be addressed in the report for the rezoning application. The staff recommendation was made prior to and without the benefit of public testimony on the matter. Following a public hearing before the Planning Commission on February 21, 2012, where two members of the public spoke in opposition to the proposed amendment, the Planning Commission recommended that City Council deny the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment. B. Annexation Plan Amendment (Map 13-1 & Map 13-2) Staff submitted a recommendation to the Planning Commission to support t the addition of this property to the Category 2 Annexation Area with a Land Use Classification of Agriculture. The support of the amendment is not indicative of support of the annexation itself. If the property is proposed for annexation, Staff believes that deference must be given to the results of the Cost Revenue Analysis to determine if the annexation is in the best interest of the City. Inclusion of the property in the annexation area would allow the applicant to request annexation, at which time a full review of the application can occur. Staff notes that the property is located within the AICUZ (Air Installations Compatible Use Zone) Study area for the Dover Air Force Base, and if annexed, the zoning of the property would be subject to the requirements of the Airport Environs Overlay Zone (AEOZ). The staff recommendation was made prior to and without the benefit of public testimony on the matter. Following a public hearing before the Planning Commission on February 21, 2012, where no members of the public spoke regarding the proposed amendment, the

MI-12-01 – 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Report to City Council March 12, 2012 Page 5 Planning Commission recommended that City Council approve the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Attachments: Proposed Amendments to Maps 12-1, 13-1 & 13-2 Land Development Plan, Annexation Area, and Potential Land Use for Annexation Areas (3 maps) City Council Minutes of January 5, 2009 (select pages) City Council Minutes of February 2, 2009 (select pages) Excerpt from DRAFT Planning Commission Minutes of February 21, 2012 DAC Agency Comments PLUS Comment Letter

City of Dover, DRAFT Le wisD r Delaware Map 12-1:Land ate Development Plan DRAFT St H w y 1 d ugh R C Scarboro fo w r d Carro ra ll A D r R d ek ve Dr Ag Preservation Districts ys r e rt n ne illc Ku We State Ag Easements De sic eip Municipal Boundaries M av er W Dr Old L Mc Pl Ke az e el awa r e State a Dr Roads D n iv ers Hydrology R d U Rd ity Rd Rd ge Water Bodies k lle oa Co Dr in e d Land Use Classifications R te d Ol N ic Whi Du randyw ip Active Agriculture s po Le nt B Hw Commercial St at DoverAFB y n A ve d e R Hw ge Dr y Industrial and Public Utilities o r R 1 ac k Rd d N oa B i te ol Me Dr im Institutional lle y le Wh Bu le Troo rio i al Mi Dr r t C ck n ck V Rd S ilv e Ln gs e l D Mixed Use so e Bu n z g ous n B o arv Rd Rd L P in Dr M C Office oolh e r a ke B lvd cK r Sch ils on D t D r Pl ee Brad Rd ea kR d Open Space, Conservation, Recreation re s ttn e Fr W le Oa o dc y t ie Rd r Residential High Density rD Bu te Rd Wo hi t St k Ave te S r t W co c s Ave ss S Residential Low Density dford Ro an N Sta A ve r nous S HH op kin r Rd e c oa Residential Medium Density N Bra ve rnors e Lon A Ke n Walk NW Pl t ton d wS R s R Rd g Po d Train Track Ca illi A c acia e Tre t St N Ne est S t ce o ing am W d Willi NG an r R Fox Rd B icen in t R rn Bu r rS ru N Dupo P ea e Water n St Dr d S p sch R d el R D or m rb et gu St H az Mi t y e d Clara u ee pen d e l se Av e t ta N Littl e Creek Rd tennia l B l v Rd nS M ar In d e Sw Ha la nd l Av Sauls B NQ N U p en h si o il lu o E xt nt H i vi St Clara ED Ke n e Dr bury Ave Gr ware ne wy d Dela ton R en St yD t t tS on S Hil l R d ce an d un t re Rd Rid Fult r Park Dr Blvd rm d Hw e ly St ck y Ro St oo e Dr ge ion No b Div is EL As Adopted on Lady Bu g D W ed S t Kings r t : W Re l mes S Forrest Ave Forest Leg February 9, 2009 Forrest Ave St ve S Saul Linc oln St Court St w S Qu ve A Ho S Littl e Cree k Rd is lati Fa n St S Farmview Dr Paul St S Ne w St eral St Ro As Amended in r St F ed November 2009, St d Traf ghte E Wa vd sbury R al Slau e en ter St Bl Dr do ga B lvd en is March 2011 & April 2011 r t Ot Ave rS r H Elm Te lue r ta Wate H o rs e th t or Dr be tS w r SW W Ri v B sl e is e ib n As Proposed March 2012 Tr Dr M r R Ha Be N d l Sunset Ter if f e We s tt bi est o in R R nd St ve po 0 3,000 6,000 t St Pu Ba r S State St d L ic Feet 1 Monroe Ter bl yR Rd Dr d e H wy i ll Dr a d Tr Sa Wyom ing M il y tv t Hw rel n t au Ln fe t le at Sta t az rty S Governors Ave Elec s p or t yB e West view Ter H St p on ffe Pine ir La o nC lv d s St tr ic S Bradford St S Du Lotu i l Rd Ave Wyom ing Ave Paper Map DISCLAIMER: Roosevelt Ave r Ave Ga By acceptance of this map material, you agree to the following: la x y S ta r lifte Rd Dr This map material is made available by the City of Dover, n ctor onne Dr Oa k r to Ly R Ho n haven D r C Ba y r se Delaware as a public service. The material is for reference n Ru n Bu po n on d Rd purposes only, and the City makes no warranty, he w d representation, or guaranty as to the accuracy of the Ne d material. You release the City, its agents, servants, Fid Pu nc ler y and employees, from any and all liability related to the Alder Rd t Hw material, including its accuracy, availability, use, and s A Kes selring v e Grn misuse. In no event shall the City be liable for any direct Ave Mockingbird up o n or indirect damages suffered related to the use of this data Mim osa Ave including, but not limited to, physical injury, death, property SD damage, economic loss, or other consequential damages suffered by the Recipient or others arising from any inadequacies of the digital data or the Recipient’s use of this data. The material is in the public domain and may be copied without permission. Citation to the source would be appreciated. Any errors or omissions in the material should be reported to the City of Dover, Delaware’s Public Services US Department. Hw y 11 3 Date Printed: April 25, 2011 Date Created: June 5, 2008 File: m:\ps_data\Comp Plan 2008 \Final Maps Update 2011 \land_development_plan 0 2,700 5,400 Department: Planning Feet City of Dover, Delaware

DRAFT City of Dover, Delaware Map 13-1 Potential Annexation Areas See Note B DRAFT Ag Preservation Districts See Note B State Ag Easements Municipal Boundaries See Note B See Note B County Parcels Dover Parcels Common Interest with Wyoming Category 1: High Priority Annexation Areas Category 2: 0-10 years See Note A Priority Annexation Areas Category 3: 5 + years Areas to be Considered for Long Term Annexation Areas of Concern As Adopted on See Note A : 0 February 9, 2009 As Proposed March 2012 4,200 8,400 See Note A Feet See Note A Paper Map DISCLAIMER: By acceptance of this map material, you agree to the following: This map material is made available by the City of Dover, Delaware as a public See Note A service. The material is for reference purposes only, and the City makes no warranty, representation, or guaranty as to the accuracy of the material. You release the City, its agents, servants, and employees, from any and all liability related to the material, including its accuracy, vailability, use, and misuse. In no event shall the City be liable for any direct or indirect damages suffered related to the use of this data including, but not limited to, physical injury, death, property damage, economic loss, or other consequential damages suffered by the Recipient or others arising from any inadequacies of the digital data or the Recipient’s use of this data. The material is in the public domain and may be copied without permission. Citation to the source would be appreciated. Note B: Any errors or omissions in the material should be reported to the City of Dover, Any development in this area will be subject to the provisions of a master plan to be developed in Delaware’s Public Services Department. Note A: cooperation with the property owner, the State of Delaware, and the City of Dover. If any of this These parcels are enrolled in an Agricultural Preservation District (APD) . area annexes prior to plans for development, the land will be zoned A (Agriculture Zone). If Date Printed: February 2, 2009 The City of Dover may consider these parcels for annexation when annexation is associated with a development application, a zoning district will be applied that is Date Created: May 15, 2008 and if the APD is removed by the owners, but only with the property compatible with a master plan associated with the property to be annexed. No amendment to File: m:\ps_data\projects\comp_plan2008\ owner's consent. A plan amendment will not be required, unless the Comprehensive Plan is required as long as development is proposed in accordance with a master final Maps\ \Final Potential Annexation areas five years have passed between the date of plan certification and plan developed in coordination with the property owner, the State of Delaware, and the City of Dover. Department: Planning and Inspections the application for annexation. City of Dover, Delaware

City of Dover, DRAFT Delaware Map 13-2 See Note B Potential Land Use for Annexation Areas Commercial See Note B See Note B Industrial and Public Utilities Mixed Use Office and Office Park Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density To Be Master Planned at time of Annexation Active Agriculture Common Interest with Wyoming Municipal Boundaries County Parcels Dover Parcels DRAFT As Adopted on : 0 February 9, 2009 As Proposed March 2012 3,000 6,000 Feet Paper Map DISCLAIMER: By acceptance of this map material, you agree to the following: This map material is made available by the City of Dover, Delaware as a public service. The material is for reference purposes only, and the City makes no warranty, representation, or guaranty as to the accuracy of the material. You release the City, its agents, servants, and employees, from any and all liability related to the material, including its accuracy, vailability, use, and misuse. In no event shall the City be liable for any direct or indirect damages suffered related to the use of this data including, but not limited to, physical injury, death, property damage, economic loss, or other consequential damages suffered by the Recipient or others arising from any inadequacies of the digital data or the Recipient’s use of this data. Note B: Any development in this area will be subject to the provisions of a The material is in the public domain and may be copied without permission. master plan to be developed in cooperation with the property Citation to the source would be appreciated. owner, the State of Delaware, and the City of Dover. If any of this Any errors or omissions in the material should be reported to the City of Dover, area annexes prior to plans for development, the land will be zoned Delaware’s Public Services Department. A (Agriculture Zone). If annexation is associated with a development application, a zoning district will be applied that is Date Printed: February 9, 2009 compatible with a master plan associated with the property to be Date Created: July 17, 2008 annexed. No amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is required as File: m:\ps_data\projects\comp_plan2008 long as development is proposed in accordance with a master plan \Final Land Use forannexation areas developed in coordination with the property owner, the State of Map Created by: Delaware, and the City of Dover. Department: Planning and Inspections City of Dover, Delaware

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 2009 PAGE 4 Mr. Ruane encouraged members to consider not only the current user of the property and how it is used, but also how it could be used under the land designation and its subsequent zoning. He suggested that a more appropriate land use designation would be institutional. At the request of Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Townshend stated that, depending on the commercial zoning classification, convenience stores, restaurants, etc., could be permitted. The motion to approve the Planning Commission’s recommendation for Item #2 to change the land use designation from residential to commercial for property located at 200 Saulsbury Road was carried by a role call vote of five (5) yes, two (2) no (Mrs. Russell and Mr. Ruane), and two (2) abstentions (Mr. McGlumphy and Mrs. Williams). Mr. McGlumphy and Mrs. Williams abstained due to their current and previous affiliation with the Elks Lodge. Items #3, #4, and #7 - Land Development Plan Change - #3: 4 Mifflin Road, Owned by Peter and Bonny Reidy; #4: 24 Mifflin Road, Owned by Robert Klewans and Carol Candor; and #7: 1510 Forrest Avenue, Owned by Doreen Lucas Mrs. Townshend reviewed the requests of Peter and Bonny Reidy - 4 Mifflin Road (ED05-076.09-01- 11.00) ; Robert Klewans and Carol Candor - 24 Mifflin Road (ED05-076.09-01-12.00); and Doreen Lucas - 1510 Forrest Avenue (ED05-076.09-01-08.00) to change the land use designation for the properties located at 4 Mifflin Road, 24 Mifflin Road, and 1510 Forrest Avenue from residential to commercial. She noted that staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request for the properties to be reflected as commercial in the Comprehensive Plan. Council President Hogan declared the public hearing open. Mr. Richard L. Ornauer, 17 Mifflin Road, stated that items #3 and #4 are properties located within the Mifflin Road Neighborhood Association and since item #7 is not (1510 Forrest Avenue), he requested that the items be separated. Responding, Council President Hogan indicated that during the voting, item #7 will be considered separately. Mr. Ornauer thanked the Planning Staff for the multiple hours of work and public workshops held in the development of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. He relayed opposition to the request for the properties on Mifflin Road being designated as commercial. With reference to the close proximity to the proposed new Dover High School, Mr. Ornauer assured members that there is no relationship between Mifflin Road and the proposed high school. He advised members that on October 18, 1985, an application was made for changing the properties at Route 8 and Mifflin Road to commercial, which was denied by the Planning Commission on November 18, 1985 by a vote of six (6) to two (2). He also advised members that a petition was submitted by the Mifflin Road Neighborhood Association in opposition to the commercialization of the properties. He noted that two (2) of the signers of the petition are the applicants to items #3 and #4. In addition, he stated that they are signatories to a petition opposed to the establishment of the original Wawa. Since City Council overruled the Planning Commission’s recommendation to deny the application for changing the properties to commercial, Mr. Ornauer advised members that the Mifflin Road Neighborhood Association filed a law suit against the City of Dover. He stated that the court case ultimately went to Chancery Court and, in a decision issued on November 28, 1985, Vice Chancellor Jacobson supported the Association, indicating that there was nothing to support the requested change in zoning.

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 2009 PAGE 5 Mr. Ornauer indicated that Mifflin Road has been designated as a residential roadway by the State Department of Transportation. He also advised members that, in accordance with the Delaware Route 8 Study, there will be revisions to the Route 8/Mifflin Road Intersection, including access to the Country Club Apartments. He requested, on behalf of the Mifflin Road Neighborhood Association, that the proposed changes to items #3 and #4 be denied and that the R-8 zoning classification be retained, which, he noted, is the zoning classification of all properties located on the west side of Mifflin Road, as well as those located on the east side with the exception of the bank (intersection of Route 8 and Mifflin Road). Mrs. Rexene Ornauer, 17 Mifflin Road, advised members that, due to the amount of traffic on Mifflin Road, residents have difficulty exiting their drive-ways safely. She noted safety issues involving the intersection at Route 8 and Mifflin Road, as well as the entranceway to the bank due to its close proximity to the intersection. She stated that of those proposed commercial properties, it would not be possible to install a safe entrance/exit on Mifflin Road. She urged members not to take any further action that would make Mifflin Road any more unsafe. Ms. Jennifer Holden, 15 Mifflin Road, concurred with the traffic concerns on Mifflin Road and requested that the roadway remain residential. Although action cannot be taken to reverse the current commercial properties located at the end of Mifflin Road, she stated that action can be taken to preserve the remaining residential properties. Mr. Carl Patterson, 19 Mifflin Road, reiterated that Mifflin Road consists of a beautiful residential area. He noted that the Wawa has encroached on the quality of life for the residents of Mifflin Road and he felt that approval of the request would be a disaster for these residents. With no one else wishing to speak, Council President Hogan declared the public hearing closed. Responding to Mr. Leary, Mrs. Townshend explained that the factors involving staff’s recommendation were due to the corner property across from the subject parcels being commercial and that the predominant use along the Route 8 corridor is becoming commercial. She also reminded members that staff’s recommendations were made prior to any public testimony. Mr. Slavin moved to approve the Planning Commission’s recommendation for items #3 - 4 Mifflin Road and #4 - 24 Mifflin Road to change the land use designation for these properties from residential to commercial. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Williams and failed by a unanimous roll call vote. Mrs. Williams moved to deny the Planning Commission’s recommendation for Item #3 - 4 Mifflin Road and Item #4 - 24 Mifflin Road and that these properties be designated as low density residential in the Land Development Plan. The motion was seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Since the result of the motion was against the Planning Commission’s recommendation, Council President Hogan explained that each member must state their reasons. Mr. Leary stated his reasons were due to the continuing acute nature of the traffic problems along Mifflin Road and his feeling that staff and the Planning Commission did not have the opportunity to consider the changes coming forward from DelDOT.

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 2009 PAGE 6 Mrs. Russell stated her reason was due to the objections from the residents of Mifflin Road and indicated that they are homeowners and taxpayers whose opinions matter. Mr. McGlumphy indicated his reason was due to the request being against the City’s principle to establish more residential properties. He also indicated his being cognizant of the neighbors and their opinions. Mr. Slavin stated his concurrence with the reasons as stated by Mr. Leary. Mr. McGiffin stated his reason was for the preservation of the residential character of the neighborhood. Mrs. Williams stated her reasons involved concerns of traffic safety and the well-being of the residents of Mifflin Road and also due to the expenditure of taxpayer’s money in addressing traffic issues on this roadway. Mr. Salters stated his reason was due to the safety of the residents of Mifflin Road. Mr. Ruane referred to page 149 of the draft 2008 Comprehensive Plan, which indicates the assumptions for residential land use and noted that proper separation of incompatible land uses is accomplished through physical distance and buffering, which creates stronger neighborhoods. He stated that Mifflin Road is a strong neighborhood which he wishes to maintain. In addition to those reasons as stated by members, Council President Hogan indicated his reason was a desire to maintain residential properties along Route 8 towards the proposed high school and avoid commercialization of properties surrounding the proposed high school. Mr. Slavin moved to approve the Planning Commission’s recommendation for Item #7 - 1510 Forrest Avenue to change the land use designation for this property from residential to commercial, seconded by Mr. Salters. Mr. McGiffin noted that the property adjacent to 1510 Forrest Avenue, which is located in the County, is zoned residential. Considering the action Council took in regards to Items #3 and #4, involving 4 and 24 Mifflin Road, it was his opinion that the Planning Commission and staff’s recommendations are not as logical at this time. The motion to approve the Planning Commission’s recommendation for Item #7 failed by a unanimous roll call vote. Mrs. Williams moved to deny the Planning Commission’s recommendation for Item #7 and that the property located at 1510 Forrest Avenue be designated as low density residential in the Land Development Plan. The motion was seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 2009 PAGE 7 Since the result of the motion was against the Planning Commission’s recommendation, Council President Hogan explained that each member must state their reasons. Mr. Leary stated his reasons were due to the continuing traffic problems along Route 8 and that a change in the land use would break up a residential neighborhood area. Mrs. Russell stated her concurrence with the reasons stated by Mr. Leary. Mr. McGlumphy indicated his reason was due to safety issues and spot zoning. Mr. Slavin stated his concurrence with the reasons stated by Mr. Leary. Mr. McGiffin stated his reason was for the preservation of the residential character of the neighborhood. Mrs. Williams stated her reason was due to non-conforming issues. Mr. Salters stated his reason was due to safety issues. Mr. Ruane stated his reason was for a separation of residential areas from incompatible uses. Council President Hogan indicated his reason was due to objections of a commercial zone between two (2) residential properties on a roadway towards the proposed high school. Item #5 - Land Development Plan Change - 509 S. State Street, Owned by Bruce Ennis Mrs. Townshend reviewed the request of Mr. Bruce Ennis to change the land use designation for 509 S. State Street (ED05-077.09-05-45.00) from commercial to mixed use. She noted that staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request for the property to be reflected as mixed use in the Comprehensive Plan. Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mrs. Townshend stated that although the request involved the property located at 509 S. State Street, in reviewing the request, staff has included all properties on S. State Street zoned RG-O from Water Street to Elm Terrace in the mixed use classification. Mr. Ruane suggested that until there are provisions that identify what the mixed use designation means, it should not be utilized. Council President Hogan declared the public hearing open. There being no one present wishing to speak, Council President Hogan declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Slavin moved for approval of the Planning Commission’s recommendation for Item #5 to change the land use classification to mixed use for property located at 509 S. State Street. The motion was seconded by Mr. McGiffin and carried by a roll call vote of eight (8) yes and one (1) no (Mr. Ruane).

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 2, 2009 PAGE 5 Mifflin Road Mr. Pete Reidy, 4 Mifflin Road, stated that he was “caught off guard” when Council voted in opposition to the request to convert his property to commercial. He explained that much of the traffic along Mifflin Road is a result of housing developments that have occurred during the past five (5) to six (6) years. He advised members that the property is primarily a Route 8 item as opposed to a Mifflin Road item and that when the property was purchased, it had a Forrest Avenue address. Noting that commercial properties have continued to grow along Route 8, he relayed difficulty in understanding why it should end at his property. He requested Council’s reconsideration for approval of the long-term plan. Mr. Bob Klewans, 24 Mifflin Road, stated his request to be included with the “Reidy” property was made with the understanding that the development of the property would allow ingress/egress from Route 8 and would not generate additional traffic along Mifflin Road. He explained that the traffic problem along Mifflin Road is not with the commercial properties but rather with there being no other north/south street connecting North Street with Route 8. It was his opinion that Mifflin Road has become a throughway due to the growth of the City and that the excessive traffic along Mifflin Road is not the result of the commercial properties at the intersection of Mifflin Road and Route 8. Mr. Klewans also noted that there has been additional traffic resulting from the addition of the Pitts Center and Schutte Park, located off of Electric Avenue, which is an extension of Mifflin Road that crosses North Street. Mr. Richard Ornauer, 17 Mifflin Road, stated that in addition to his family, he was addressing members on behalf of the Mifflin Road Neighborhood Association. He advised members that there is another north/south street connecting North Street with Route 8, which is Saulsbury Road. He noted that Mifflin Road has become a thoroughfare that connects the community of Wyoming and Dover. In addition to an email previously submitted to Council, he presented a petition signed by 48 residents of Mifflin Road in opposition to any change from residential to commercial for properties located at 4 and 24 Mifflin Road (Exhibit #2). As indicated in the email, he reiterated that the Mifflin Road Neighborhood Association strongly opposes any change from the basic residential nature of Mifflin Road. Mr. A.C. Lucas, 178 Humphreys Drive, Camden, stated that he owns 1521 Forrest Avenue, which is adjacent to Mr. Reidy’s property. He stated that these corner properties are located in a good location for commercial use, less than 150 yards from a large shopping center, the Wawa, and WSFS bank, and offers good exposure for any business, which typically results in good revenue. With regards to the traffic, he stated that any growth in the City will create an increase in traffic. He noted that although its completion will be 10+ years, the West Side Connector will provide traffic relief to the area. Mr. Lucas reminded members that, should the land use change for the properties, it does not necessarily equate to a rezoning. A rezoning application will require analysis by the City to assure it is beneficial; however, if the land use is not changed, a rezoning request would not be permitted. Mrs. Rexene Ornauer, 17 Mifflin Road, advised members that, while canvassing the neighborhood, she was apprised of many traffic safety concerns involving residents attempting to exit their driveways. She also indicated that there were many concerns relayed regarding the vehicular speeds

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 2, 2009 PAGE 6 along Mifflin Road, which had been designated as a residential street by DelDOT. She stated that although there has been building west and south of Dover, there is no need to make the traffic situation worse. She felt that the commercial area along Route 8 should stop at Mifflin Road and noted that all properties along Route 8 west of Mifflin Road are residential. She felt that this would particularly be important considering that a high school is planned for the area. Mr. Larry Josefowski, 27 Mifflin Road, stated his concurrence with the statements of Mr. and Mrs. Ornauer. Although he felt that the corner properties would be a great location for a business, he did not feel it would be a good idea for the residents of the area. He reiterated the importance of considering the close proximity of the new high school. His biggest concern is with regards to the potential of expanding commercial properties along Mifflin Road beyond the corner properties. Ms. Dawn Ford, 44 Mifflin Road, stated her belief that the properties would provide for a successful commercial business, which is a concern. As a result of its potential success, it would only cause additional safety issues and other problems that are being realized by the residents of the area. She questioned where the residents’ rights stop versus those who wish to develop commercial properties. On behalf of the mothers who reside along Mifflin Road, she requested that members consider their concerns when they hear their daughters pulling out of the driveway onto Mifflin Road and they hear horns honking. Ms. Ford advised members that she recently considered selling her home, but decided against it. Since she has been a resident for 17 years, she thought it would be best to have her voice heard by those responsible for making decisions for the betterment of the community. East Loockerman Street Mr. James Thistlewood, 455 East Loockerman (corner of Bayard Avenue and East Loockerman), noted that this section of East Loockerman Street serves as a gateway to the City and that the residents take pride in maintaining their property in representing the City. He felt that this area should be residential and minimally remain at its current zoning with no further commercialization. He stated that East Dover is one of the oldest communities in Dover and should be maintained as a residential area. Dr. Joel Halpern advised members that he was raised at 445 East Loockerman Street and represents Ms. Florence Halpern. He, too, noted that this section of East Loockerman Street serves as a gateway to the City for those entering off of Route 13. He felt it was critical that the area remain residential. Ms. Pat Heather, 432 East Loockerman Street, relayed concern with any change making commercial properties along this street. Being a resident since 1958, she stated that it is a wonderful neighborhood and requested that members keep it as such. Mr. William Coughlin. 529 East Loockerman Street, referred to a letter dated December 20, 2007 from HUB Associates (Exhibit #3), which explains their intentions for the development of the southwest corner of East Loockerman Street and Route 13. He relayed concern that the changes proposed would have a negative impact on the residential community surrounding the properties. He noted that in 1997, a variance was provided to the HUB Associates and that the property with the house should have been provided an R-10 zoning classification; however, it was zoned as CPO. In

Excerpt from DRAFT Planning Commission Minutes of February 21, 2012 MI-12-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2012 – Public Hearing and Review for Recommendation to City Council on a series of Amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, as amended, by replacing Map 12-1: Land Development Plan, Map 13-1: Annexation Areas, and Map 13-2 Potential Land Use for Annexation Areas. Ordinance #2012-12. Under consideration are requests from the following applicants: A. Request from three parcels located at the southwest corner of Forrest Avenue (Route 8) and Mifflin Road to revise the Land Use Classification from Residential Low Density to Commercial on Map 12-1: Land Development Plan Map. Property Addresses: 4 Mifflin Road, 24 Mifflin Road, and 1510 Forrest Avenue. This is associated with rezoning application Z-12-01. B. Request from a property located south of South Little Creek Road and east of Horsepond Road to be added to Map13-1: Annexation Areas as a Category 2 Annexation Area and added to Map 13-2: Potential Land Use for Annexation Areas with a Land Use Classification as Agriculture. Property: Portion of parcel ED-00- 078.00-01-25.00-000 in the ownership of Eastern Woodlands Holdings, LLC C/o Chris Coker). Mrs. Townshend stated that we have two (2) applicants that have requested Plan Amendments. For clarity, Staff would recommend that two (2) public hearings be held, one on each. There are two (2) amendments to the Comprehensive Plan that have been requested by property owners. One is an amendment to the Land Development Plan which is Map 12-1 and the other is an amendment to the Annexation Plan. Part A: Mrs. Townshend further stated that she would start discussion with regards to the Land Development Plan Amendment. This is a change in land use classification from Residential Low-Density to Commercial for the property located at the southwest corner of Mifflin Road and Route 8. This is associated with a Rezoning application Z-12-01 which has been deferred to next month’s Planning Commission. This application involves three (3) properties: 4 Mifflin Road, 24 Mifflin Road, and 1510 Forrest Avenue. Mrs. Townshend further stated the report includes information from the applicant and analysis from Staff’s perspective of how this relates to the language in the Comprehensive Plan and the broader goals of the Comprehensive Plan. In this particular case, Staff has included excerpts of minutes from City Council meetings on January 5 and February 2, 2009 when the Comprehensive Plan was initially adopted. At that time, the property owners had requested that this area be viewed as commercial in the Comprehensive Plan. You will find in the attached minutes that a number of property owners along Mifflin Road expressed concern about the commercial use of that corner. Mrs. Townshend further stated in looking at the Comprehensive Plan language and the development pattern in this area, there seems to be some degree of justification in that commercial uses are appropriate for that area; however, Staff is aware of some concerns regarding conflict of some of the more intense commercial uses and how they would relate to the

adjacent residential properties. Mrs. Townshend further started that Staff notes that the property across the street that is the location of the WSFS Bank is zoned CPO so this property is shown as commercial in the Comprehensive Plan; however, holds the CPO zoning which is a lower intensity and lower traffic generator. Typically, the operations that you have in the CPO zone have hours that are more compatible than a 24 hour convenience store. One of the suggestions that Staff has made to the applicant is that if the Comprehensive Plan Amendment moves forward with a favorable recommendation, that they look at the zoning and have a zoning that maybe more compatible to a transition between the commercial area and the residential area. Mrs. Townshend further stated as it relates to the Comprehensive Plan itself, the Staff recommendation is that the requested change from Residential Low-Density to Commercial is very much in keeping with the character of the area, the Route 8 area in particular and the description of this area as depicted in the Comprehensive Plan. There were no questions from any Planning Commission members at this time. Mr. Hemmig opened a public hearing. Mr. A.C. Lucas – Camden, Delaware – Stated that he is one of the owners of 1510 Forrest Avenue. He would like to reiterate that the 2008 Comprehensive Plan seems to be consistent. He would also like everyone to take into consideration that this is within the Corridor Overlay Zone so hopefully it would be more suitable as a transitional area because of the enhanced design requirements of that Corridor Overlay Zone. Mr. Tom Bynes – 1514 Forrest Avenue – Stated that he actually lives at 1514 Forrest Avenue as this is our home. We have lived here since 1985 and have watched Route 8 go from two (2) lanes to three (3) lanes. His concern is commercializing this property as he is adjacent to it. He does not understand how anything could go commercial there and not impede traffic that we already have there now. As we sit there today trying to get out of our driveway at certain times of the day, it is almost impossible with race weekends being the same. This is something that we have lived with because we have lived there a long time. With the idea of commercializing this property, he cannot see how entry and exit could work on Route 8 right now the way that it is. How will they get into whatever commercial goes in there and how are they going to get out? As close as they are to the corner he does not see it working. Mr. Edwin Baker – 1526 Forrest Avenue – Stated that his first concern is that he is curious as to why there are three properties that are up for rezoning and what will develop here. If it is going to be a situation where there is a type of construction it will be for the business. Because we have had the Wawa store which is where the bank is now which was an overnight operation and his concern would be what is going to be the ultimate limit for this. In other words, he was told at one time that this was going to be the ultimate line for commercial usage and now all of a sudden there are three (3) more properties that have come up which is going to move it a little further. His concern is the type of zoning that it will be. He does not want to see a gas station or a liquor store or a 24 hour service center there. His concern is the type of zoning that you end up

recommending. He would assume that no one can divulge who is looking at this property and what it is going to be? Responding to Mr. Baker, Mrs. Townshend stated that she has not heard anything from the applicant. Mr. Baker further stated that it is odd that three (3) properties in a row have requested this zoning so there is obviously someone interested that needs a lot of property to build whatever they want to build. Responding to Mr. Baker, Mr. Townshend stated that the request was for C-2A which is what the Wawa property has which would allow things that are twenty-four hour operations. The WSFS property at the opposite corner is zoned CPO which allows for banks, professional offices, financial institutions and insurance agencies which tend to be less intense of a use than the hard core commercial uses. The CPO zone when it was developed in the 1990’s, was frequently used as a transitional zone between commercial areas and residential areas. Mrs. Townshend further stated in fairness to the applicant, she will tell you that she only got them the zoning comparison information today so they have probably not made a determination if they will change the nature of the zoning application to either one of those zones. In the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as proposed, it would allow for either of these zoning classifications. This does not mean that they get to choose; it does have to go through the process and either would be consistent with the Plan. Mr. Baker further stated that his concern is going to be that the zoning eliminates 24 hour service there along with those types of businesses because he can tell you from living here for 40 some years since the commercial area has come they have had several robberies in this area. The Dairy Queen has been robbed, Wawa has had some problems, and the bank has had a hold up once. You can see as a resident, we are starting to get concerned. His other concern will be that once this is rezoned and we find out what it is going to be there he will be concerned as to how they buffer the property from the rest of the residents. The reason for that is that we have livestock behind this area and when it is opened up as you may or may not know, it is hard to see our property at this point; however, when they remove these houses, it will expose our property which we have horses on. This is going to cause a potential problem because he already has some problems with the apartments across the street as he has people who come over and want to stick their hands over and want to feed the horses. As this moves forward these are the things that we would like to see addressed. Mrs. Bonnie Reidy – 4 Mifflin Road also known as 1512 Forrest Avenue – Stated that the concerns that have been brought up today have been brought up many times before. She has been a resident of Mifflin Road for twenty-eight (28) years and when they first moved there, it was a country setting. We then went to five (5) lanes of traffic with the turn lane in the middle with several accidents happening on the corner as they still do. The traffic concerns are going to become more evident once the high school comes in and there is no stopping that right now because that is in the making and we will have a lot of younger drivers. She does not see the traffic as being the issue here because the traffic is already there. She does not see how that is

going to change anything. As far as bringing in people who are unwanted, their own house on the corner was also robbed, these things do happen. She does not see with changing this from Residential to Commercial that it is going to change any of that. Mr. Hemmig closed the public hearing after seeing no one else wishing to speak. Mr. Hemmig stated that he understands that people commenting on this the last time at the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting are here again. He has personal concerns with the types of commercial uses without some restrictions. You are jumping the creek here and going into heavy residential areas. Mr. Friedman stated that we have spent a lot of time in working with the WSFS Bank and the Wawa site making sure that the WSFS was a lower level of density. He would not be in favor of zoning this to C-2A as it is in a residential neighborhood area. Mr. Baldwin questioned if this application moves forward, there will be a hearing on the rezoning correct? Responding to Mr. Baldwin, Mrs. Townshend stated yes, the Rezoning hearing will be scheduled for next month. This only changes the Comprehensive Plan which technically under State law would have to happen before we could rezone the piece to either C- 2A or CPO. Mr. Ambruso stated that he was not comfortable with changing the zoning just for the sake of changing it. We already know what it is; we do not know what it will be. Mr. Hemmig stated that he would agree with Mr. Ambruso as he is opposed as we have the Comprehensive Plan laid out as medium residential and he feels that it should stay that way. Mr. Ambruso moved to forward recommendation to City Council to deny MI-12-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2012 Part A- request to change from Residential Low-Density to Commercial, seconded by Mr. Friedman and the motion was unanimously carried 6-0 with Mr. Holt, Mr. Nichols and Colonel Welsh absent. Part B: Request from a property located south of South Little Creek Road and east of Horsepond Road to be added to Map 13-1: Annexation Areas as a Category 2 Annexation Area and added to Map 13-2: Potential Land Use for Annexation Areas with a Land Use Classification as Agriculture. Mrs. Townshend stated that this is for property that is located east of Horsepond Road and south of South Little Creek Road that is to be added to the annexation area. Currently, there are properties adjacent to this that front Horsepond Road that are within the Category 1 Annexation area. In keeping with the policy of limited or no growth east of State Route 1, the larger properties that are east of Horsepond Road and south of South Little Creek Road were never included in the annexation area. The property owner of this property had approached the City and is working with a solar energy provider to look at the idea of developing solar energy on the site. There have been some discussions with the City in this regard and with the Dover Air Force Base on how the energy could be used. At this point, her understanding is that neither the Base

nor the City has committed to purchasing energy from a solar facility here. Neither the City Electric Department nor the Base has determined whether there is any interest in pursuing that. This cannot be considered for annexation unless it is in the annexation area. The applicant has requested that this area be added to the annexation area as Category 2 with a Land Use Designation of Agriculture. Mr. Friedman left the meeting at 8:40 PM leaving quorum for the remainder of the meeting at five (5) members. Mrs. Townshend further stated that Staff has received the PLUS comments regarding this application and there was not a lot of detail provided on this particular area from the State because it is Level IV and because it is east of State Route 1. The State does not object to the Plan Amendment because of the restrictions of the Airport Environs Overlay Zone and the fact that we would be looking to bring it into an Agricultural zone. There was no comment from any Planning Commission members at this time. Mr. Hemmig opened a public hearing and after seeing no one wishing to speak closed the public hearing. Mr. Hemmig stated that it makes sense to bring this as future area for annexation. Mr. Ambruso moved to forward recommendation to City Council of approval for MI-12-01 Part B Request to take into the Annexation Area of Map 13-1 and 13-2 as a Category 2 with the Land Use Classification of Agriculture, seconded by Mr. Baldwin and the motion was unanimously carried 5-0 with Mr. Holt, Mr. Nichols, Colonel Welsh and Mr. Friedman absent.

CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2012 APPLICATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 2012 FILE #: MI-12-01 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric and Public Works Departments CONTACT PERSON: Steve Enss - Electric Jason A. Lyon - Water, Wastewater, Stormwater CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7070 T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER 1. Our office has no objections to the proposed amendments. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER 1. None ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT ELECTRIC / WATER / WASTEWATER / STORMWATER 1. None. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE .

CITY OF DOVER D E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE L APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D O D.A.C. MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 T =============================================================== APPLICATION: Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2012 FILE#: MI-12-01 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT CONTACT PERSON: Julio F. Seneus PHONE#: 760-2145 =============================================================== THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. DelDOT has no comments. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person and the planning department as soon as possible.

1 FINAL READING 2 CITY OF DOVER 3 PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2012-02 4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY REPLACING 5 MAP 12-1: LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP 13-1: ANNEXATION AREAS, AND 6 MAP 13-2 POTENTIAL LAND USE FOR ANNEXATION AREAS. 7 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dover, on February 9, 2009, adopted the 2008 8 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Title 22, Section 702 of the Delaware Code; and 9 WHEREAS, the Honorable Jack Markell, Governor of the State of Delaware, certified the 2008 10 Comprehensive Plan on April 24, 2009; and 11 WHEREAS, the 2008 Comprehensive Plan allows for an annual amendment process; and 12 WHEREAS, four property owners have requested amendments to the Land Development Plan Map 13 (Map 12-1) and Annexation Plan (Maps 13-1 and 13-2), in accordance with the process set forth in 14 the 2008 Comprehensive Plan; and 15 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 21, 2012, after which the 16 Commission made a recommendation in regards to the proposed amendments to the Land 17 Development Plan and Annexation Plan related to the above request. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED THAT the Mayor and Council of the City of Dover 19 hereby amend Map 12-1: Land Development Plan, Map 13-1: Annexation Areas, and Map 13-2 20 Potential Land Use for Annexation Areas of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, as amended on 21 November 23, 2009; March 14, 2011; and April 11, 2011, by replacing the referenced maps with 22 the Amended Map 12-1, 13-1 and 13-2, presented to City Council on March 12, 2012. 23 ADOPTED: 24 SYNOPSIS 25 The proposed ordinance would adopt amendments to the 26 2008 Comprehensive Plan, as amended on November 23, 2009; 27 March 14, 2011; and April 11, 2011. 28 Actions History 29 March 12, 2012 - Scheduled for Public Hearing/Final Reading by Council 30 January 23, 2012 - First Reading/Referral by Council 31 February 21, 2012 - Scheduled for Consideration by Planning Commission 32 March 12, 2012 - Scheduled for Public Hearing/Final Reading by Council

UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee Meeting was held on February 27, 2012 at 5:39 p.m. with Chairman Bonar presiding. Members present were Mr. Lynn, Mrs. Williams, Mr. Blakeman, and Mr. Snaman. Members of Council present were Mr. Hare (departed at 5:48 p.m.) and Mr. Hutchison (arrived at 5:49 p.m.). Mayor Carey (arrived at 5:41 p.m.) was also present. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS By unanimous consent, the agenda was approved as presented. Dedication of Rights-of-Way and Public Infrastructure - Lexington Glen - Phase I Members were advised that Ashburn Homes, Inc., the party responsible for completing the public infrastructure within Phase 1 of the Lexington Glen Subdivision, has requested that all public infrastructure improvements related to this phase be dedicated to the City of Dover for permanent ownership and maintenance. Members reviewed an outline of all public improvements associated with Phase 1 and a map showing the general location and configuration of the subject rights-of-way. The total construction value of the public improvements is $1,184,627. Ashburn Homes, Inc. has completed construction of the improvements within Phase 1 in accordance with City standards and specifications. After construction was completed, City staff inspected the public improvements and developed a list of repairs to be made to meet the City of Dover Standards and Specifications for Public Works Construction. As of this date, all work required by Ms. Sharon Duca, Interim Public Works Director, has been completed. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that a one (1) year Maintenance Agreement, Letter of Credit, and a Release of Liabilities is required to be submitted as part of the dedication process. Although the Letter of Credit had not yet been submitted, he stated that it was anticipated that it would be received prior to consideration of the Committee’s recommendation by City Council. As-built drawings of the infrastructure have been provided to staff. Staff recommended acceptance of the dedication of rights-of-way and public infrastructure in Phase 1 of the Lexington Glen Subdivision, with the stipulation that the Letter of Credit must be received prior to Council action, with dedication to include all of the referenced public improvements, as follows: Sewer Utility Infrastructure (Construction Value = $234,137 ): 10" SDR-35 PVC Sanitary Sewer Main - 1,865 l.f. 8" SDR-35 PVC Sanitary Sewer Main - 945 l.f. 6" PVC Sanitary Sewer Laterals - 3,430 l.f. (98 laterals) 4' Diameter Sanitary Sewer Manholes - 12 ea. (67.42 v.f.) 8" PVC Sanitary Force Main - 110 l.f. Water Utility Infrastructure (Construction Value = $207,148 ): 8" Ductile Iron (Class 52 Cement Lined) Water Main - 3,815 l.f. 6" Ductile Iron (Class 52 Cement Lined) Water Main - 160 l.f. 1" Polyethylene Water Service Lines - 3,185 l.f. (98 services) 8" Gate Valve - 13 ea. 6" Hydrant Valve - 7 ea. Fire Hydrants - 7 ea.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 2 Storm Water Infrastructure (Construction Value = $335,564): Catch Basins - 45 ea. 4' Diameter Storm Sewer Manholes - 3 ea. Outfall Structure - 1 ea. 15" Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 2,144 l.f. 18" Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 355 l.f. 24" Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 1,536 l.f. 30" Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 1,023 l.f. 36" Type III Reinforced Concrete Pipe - 408 l.f. Flared End Sections (Concrete) - 8 ea. Street Infrastructure (0.5771 miles) (Construction Value = $407,778): Nicholas Drive Station 2+82 to Station 15+55 1,273 l.f. Thornton Street Station 0+00 to Station 10+00 1,000 l.f. Lexington Place Station 11+20 to Station 18+94 774 l.f. Mrs. Williams moved to recommend acceptance of the dedication of rights-of-way and public infrastructure for Lexington Glen - Phase I to include all of the referenced public improvements, as recommended by staff, with the stipulation that the Letter of Credit is received prior to Council action. The motion was seconded by Mr. Snaman and unanimously carried. Cash-In-Lieu of Pump Station Upgrades Agreement - Village of Maple Dale Senior Housing Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reminded members that the Village of Maple Dale Senior Housing Subdivision is currently under construction and that the subdivision is in the sanitary sewer basin that flows to the Retreat Pump Station, which is located on Pine Valley Road. The Retreat Pump Station is in need of upgrades in order to properly handle the proposed sanitary sewer flow from the complete build out of the Village of Maple Dale Senior Housing Subdivision. He stated that, typically, the developer would have to perform the upgrades to the infrastructure prior to building residences. The complete replacement of the Retreat Pump Station is planned to occur in Fiscal Year 2016. As such, staff believes that it is in the best interest of all to perform the overall replacement as planned in Fiscal Year 2016 but to utilize a cash-in-lieu of agreement with the developer rather than perform the upgrades now. He assured members that this would ensure that the new components are not removed after only four (4) years of usage. Mr. Koenig explained that, in lieu of the pump station upgrades, staff and Becker Morgan Group, Inc., (consulting engineer) agreed that a specified number of residences (30 townhomes and 18 condominium units) could be built without affecting the performance of the existing pump station. This was determined after a fairly extensive technical review of the pump station’s capacity and performance, as well as projected flows and construction timeframe. The monetary value of the upgrades that would be required for the pump station ($36,570) was established following staff’s review and approval of submitted estimates. Members reviewed a draft agreement in which Maple Dale Country Club, Inc., would pay for the necessary improvements to the pump station. This agreement states that only 30 townhomes and 18 condominium units could be built before the Retreat Pump Station is replaced.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 3 Staff recommended execution of the agreement. In response to Mr. Hare, Mr. Koenig indicated that construction has already begun on four (4) units and the required building permits have been obtained. He assured members that the City would require payment of the cash-in-lieu amount of $36,570 prior to issuing any additional building permits. Mrs. Williams moved to recommend execution of a cash-in-lieu agreement with Maple Dale Country Club, Inc. (Attachment #1), with the stipulation that no additional building permits would be issued without receipt of payment in full in the amount of $36,570. The motion was seconded by Mr. Snaman and unanimously carried. North American Energy Services (NAES) Agreement Extension Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, advised members that an Operations and Maintenance (O & M) Agreement for the City’s electric generating facilities was entered into with North American Energy Services (NAES) in 2006. The previous City Manager was prepared to extend the agreement as it currently stands through May 31, 2014. Mr. Koenig stated that, given recent discussions regarding electric rates and cost of service, staff believes that the City should renegotiate the terms of the O & M Agreement. Mr. Koenig indicated that, based on the review of Mr. Kirk Betts, the City’s Utility Attorney, the initial term of the NAES contract was four (4) years, ending in June 2010, and the agreement has an evergreen provision that would permit the City to extend the agreement on an annual basis after the initial term. All the compensation provisions remain except escalation, which is an annual adjustment. The City may terminate the agreement by giving notice at least 18 months before the proposed termination date. This notice may be given at any time. A request may be made at any time to enter into sole source negotiations with NAES to adjust the terms of compensation. Staff recommended that Council authorize the City Manager to: 1) issue a letter advising NAES of the City’s desire to review and renegotiate the terms of the O & M Agreement; and 2) issue a letter to Mr. Kirk Betts, Utility Attorney, to commence the contract negotiations. Responding to Mr. Blakeman, Mr. Koenig indicated that the concept of issuing a Request for Proposals (RFP) was discussed by Mrs. Donna Mitchell, Controller/Treasurer, and Mr. Betts. It was his understanding that once NAES is notified of the City’s desire to renegotiate, they will respond with a very favorable contract price; however, he assured members that if this is not the case, the City could solicit proposals through the market. Mr. Blakeman moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation to authorize the City Manager to: 1) issue a letter advising North American Energy Services (NAES) of the City’s desire to review and renegotiate the terms of the Operations and Maintenance (O & M) Agreement; and 2) issue a letter to Mr. Kirk Betts, Utility Attorney, to commence contract negotiations. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lynn and unanimously carried. Update - Green Energy Funding and Programming Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, noted that members received an update on Green Energy Funding and Programming and offered to respond to any questions.

UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 4 Update - Garrison Oak Technical Park Project Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, stated that staff is working on finalizing the plat for the Garrison Oak Technical Park so that lots can be recorded. It was his understanding that Calpine Corporation has filed an application which is scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission during their March meeting. He noted that the Calpine project will be constructed on one of the lots created by the subdivision of the Garrison Oak Technical Park. Mr. Koenig advised members that staff has also been working with Becker Morgan Group, the consulting engineer, regarding the construction drawings for the roads and the water and sewer systems associated with the subdivision plan related to the project. He stated that the discussions with Calpine Corporation are separate and on-going. By unanimous consent, the meeting adjourned at 5:52 P.M. David L. Bonar Chairman DLB/DD/jg/js/tm S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Minutes\2012\02-27-2012 UTILITY.wpd Attachment Attachment #1 - Cash-in-Lieu Agreement - Village of Maple Dale Senior Housing

ATTACHMENT #1 Utility Committee Meeting of February 27, 2012 CASH IN-LIEU AGREEMENT VILLAGE OF MAPLE DALE SENIOR HOUSING This AGREEMENT made this _____ day of __________ 2012 by and between the City of Dover, a Delaware Municipal Corporation, whose address is 15 Loockerman Plaza, P.O. Box 475, Dover, Delaware 19903-0475 (hereinafter referred to as the CITY), and the Maple Dale Country Club, Inc., whose address is 180 Maple Dale Circle, Dover, Delaware, 19904 (hereinafter referred to as MAPLE DALE). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, MAPLE DALE provides funding in the amount of $36,570 for the following future CITY project: 1. Retreat Pump Station Replacement, scheduled to begin in FY 2015 (July 1, 2014 – June 30, 2015). WHEREAS, the purpose of these monies is to provide the necessary improvements to the Retreat Pump Station in relation to the proposed residential construction, in lieu of MAPLE DALE providing the required upgrades for the construction of residential units. WHEREAS, these improvements fall within the limits of a CITY capital improvement project rather than a private construction project. Now therefore, CITY and MAPLE DALE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter stipulated to be kept and performed, agree as follows: SECTION I MAPLE DALE agrees to the following terms: A. MAPLE DALE will provide the CITY the funding of $36,570 prior to construction of the agreed upon residential units (thirty (30) townhomes as well as one eighteen (18) unit condominium). B. MAPLE DALE shall not construct any additional residential units prior to the CITY upgrading the Retreat Pump Station, which will be designed to have the available capacity for the remaining residential units provided in the “Village of Maple Dale Senior Housing” approved subdivision plans. C. MAPLE DALE acknowledges that this agreement does not relieve the owner from paying impact fees, or other associates fees deemed necessary with this project.

SECTION II CITY agrees to the following terms: A. CITY will provide appropriate notice and/or justification to MAPLE DALE if the Retreat Pump Station Replacement project is delayed. B. CITY will provide appropriate notice to MAPLE DALE when the Retreat Pump Station Replacement project begins and finishes. CITY and MAPLE DALE agree that this agreement is the entire and complete Agreement between the parties and that no alterations, modification or amendments of this Agreement shall be made or deemed valid unless approved in writing and signed by both parties. IN WINESS THEREOF, the parties hereunto have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate, the day and year first above written. CITY OF DOVER Approved as to form: By: ______________________ ______________________ City Solicitor Scott Koenig, P.E. City Manager MAPLE DALE COUNTY CLUB, INC. Approved as to form: By: ______________________ ______________________

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting was held on February 27, 2012 at 6:00 p.m. with Chairman McGlumphy presiding. Members present were Mr. Anderson (arrived at 6:08 p.m.), Mr. Hare (arrived at 6:01 p.m.), Dr. Jones, and Mr. Shevock. Members of Council present were Mr. Bonar (arrived at 6:15 p.m.), Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Lynn, and Mrs. Williams (arrived at 6:16 p.m.). Mayor Carey was also present (arrived at 6:03 p.m.). AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Shevock moved for approval of the agenda, as presented, seconded by Dr. Jones and unanimously carried. Staff Recommendations - Economic Development Office (Tabled by Committee on February 13, 2012) During their meeting of January 9, 2012, Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, reviewed a memorandum outlining a recommendation for restructuring the City’s Economic Development Office (EDO) and the Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP). Members tabled the matter to allow the DDP Board to submit a response. During their meeting of February 13, 2012, members again reviewed staff’s recommendation for restructuring the City’s EDO and, after much discussion, they tabled the matter to allow staff additional time to work with the DDP on the development of a recommendation. By unanimous consent, the matter was removed from the table. Mr. Koenig stated that, during the deliberations that have taken place over the last two (2) months regarding the recommendation to separate the economic development function of the City from the staffing of the DDP, many details were brought forth, and he felt that the initially proposed concept was lost. In an effort to help move the discussion forward, Mr. Koenig developed a simplified graphic representation of the current EDO/DDP structure and the proposed structure, which would separate the two (2) functions, and he reviewed this concept with members. Mr. Koenig noted that the long-term cost savings that would be produced by staff’s recommendation would apply in two (2) ways: 1) two (2) positions would be cut from the budget and the current employees would be relocated to other departments where vacancies exist; and 2) the City would continue to provide financial support for the DDP; however, there would be no unfunded liability or Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) costs associated with staff hired by the DDP. He reminded members that these are costs that would escalate over time and would impact the budget on a long-term basis under the current structure. Mr. Koenig reviewed a memorandum that he had prepared to address some of the questions that were posed during the previous Committee meeting regarding this issue. It was noted that one of these questions focused on whether or not the EDO is “profitable.” He reviewed an email dated February 21, 2012, submitted by Mr. William Neaton, Economic Development Manager, which supported the profitability of the department. Mr. Koenig stated that some of the information provided in this email was subjective and that the annual budget for this function has averaged approximately $223,000 over the past three (3) fiscal years.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 2 Mr. Koenig stated that one of the reasons for staff’s recommendation was to assist with funding the City’s budget during the next fiscal year. He reminded members that the EDO was one of the last “umbrellas” of service added to the City’s portfolio. It was created in 2008 at a time when the economy started to decline, and since that time this decline has continued. Mr. Koenig noted that there was no revenue stream associated with the services provided when the EDO was created. Since funding resources are constrained, Mr. Koenig stated he felt an obligation to discuss with members whether the EDO is the most critical service and consideration of: a) the manner in which it is funded; b) how it is operated; or c) the possibility of eliminating it. It was Mr. Hare’s recollection that, in accordance with the City Charter, the Mayor was responsible for the City’s economic development and questioned when the Charter was amended to eliminate this responsibility from the Mayor. Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that economic development transferred from the Mayor’s oversight to a separate office in 2008. Mrs. Holly Malone, 115 Shinnecock Road (former member of City Council), stated that the duties of the Mayor are to oversee the Police Department and that the EDO does not fall under the Police Department. Although Mrs. Malone understood that the Mayor promotes economic development, she felt this was not his primary responsibility. She noted that economic development is not currently included in the Mayor’s budget. For clarification, Dr. McGlumphy noted that prior to 2008/2009, economic development was included in the job description and objectives for the Mayor’s Office; however, when new job descriptions were developed at that time, economic development was no longer listed under the Mayor’s responsibilities. He suggested that Mrs. Malone review the minutes of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee of June 8, 2009, and September 14, 2009, and the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee minutes of November 23, 2009. Dr. McGlumphy explained that these minutes clearly delineate the “power struggle” that occurred regarding the placement of the EDO in the organization, as well as difficulties in the development of its objectives and benchmarks. Mrs. Malone suggested that the Mayor and City Council work together to enhance construction and building downtown, which is important for the livelihood of the City of Dover. Noting that there were several concerns regarding staff’s recommendation, Mr. Koenig stated no objection to developing an alternative recommendation and expressed his willingness to take direction from the Committee in this regard. Mr. Lynn reiterated his objections to the EDO being placed under the Planning and Inspections Department, due to potential conflicts of interest. He explained his opinion that it is imperative that the integrity of the Planning Department’s opinions with respect to site plans, subdivisions, conditional use, and rezonings be protected from accusations of bias from the opposing public. He felt that the economic development professional would be involved with cultivating projects that

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 3 would go before the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment, and City Council. If the economic development professional were placed under the direction of the Planning Director, in his opinion, the Planning Director’s independence in these matters would be compromised. Responding to Mr. Lynn, Mr. Koenig stated that there are numerous models throughout the country that endorse having an economic development professional in the planning area. Although he understood the concerns regarding a potential conflict of interest, he explained that the City’s economic development professional does not have independent authority to “make deals” or to offer incentives by his own actions. Any type of proposal for tax abatement or other incentives, over and above what is prescribed in other plans, would require consideration by Council or another Board for a recommendation and approval. Mr. Koenig stated his belief that the economic development professional for the City would have a relatively small range of items to negotiate within the structure of the City’s government. He also felt that no matter where the economic development professional is located, that individual would have to work with the Planning Office in a very integrated fashion, since any proposal presented for economic development would first have the challenge of assuring that it meets land use specifications. Mr. Koenig reminded members that within the City’s structure, there are prescribed sets of rules, explaining that the zoning ordinance indicates what can and what cannot be done with a piece of property. The Board of Adjustment is required to be very prescriptive in what is authorized and must provide specific reasons for allowing variances. He assured members that the City of Dover’s government is set up in such a sophisticated manner that the City could overcome any related challenges. Mr. Lynn noted that the definition of recklessness is “the conscious knowledge of risk and a conscious decision to disregard that risk.” He felt that staff has stated that there is a potential risk and questioned whether the benefit of placing the economic development professional under the Planning Office would outweigh the risk. He suggested that the economic professional either remain under the City Manager’s Office or be moved to the Mayor’s Office. Responding, Mr. Koenig felt that there would be risk regardless of where this individual is placed, explaining that challenges would occur under any circumstances when there is opposition to a proposed project. He reiterated his opinion that there would be no more risk for the City if the economic development professional were placed under the Planning Office than any other office, since the City makes professional decisions based on the Dover Code and the best interests of the City. Mr. Lynn also relayed concern that placing the economic development professional under the Planning Office would diminish the position and give the appearance that they are “less important.” Responding, Mr. Koenig stated that prior to the City establishing a dedicated economic development position, economic development for the City was handled through “a committee approach.” He explained that parties who were interested in development projects in the City would contact either the Mayor or City Manager and staff would develop an application for the Kent Economic Development Partnership or the Delaware Economic Development Office (DEDO). Several department heads would then fill in their components of the proposal for submission. Mr. Koenig felt that, regardless of whether the economic development position serves as a coordinator or a manager, perceptions of the position would be based on the performance of the individual, in terms of how articulate and engaging they are. He felt that this would determine the amount of respect they

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 4 are afforded by others in the economic development community. Although he understood that being a department head could add stature to the position, Mr. Koenig reminded members that the City has constrained resources, which was the rationale for staff’s recommendation. He explained that placing the position in the City Manager’s Office was not considered because Council had previously relayed concerns regarding the number of employees in the City Manager’s Office. Mr. Lynn reminded members that it was previously mentioned that the recommendation was submitted by staff solely for budgetary reasons. He noted that Mr. Neaton testified that the City’s EDO has “paid for itself” and referred to the memo provided by Mr. Neaton, dated February 21, 2012, indicating that if the Calpine project (which Mr. Neaton is currently working on) comes to fruition, it would generate $2.3M for the City, which would cover the EDO budget for 10 years. He reiterated his opinion that the City’s EDO does “pay for itself” and questioned why there would be any change whatsoever. Mr. Lynn urged members to reject staff’s recommendation in its entirety. Mrs. Williams recalled a previous development project that was handled by the City as a “committee of staff,” as previously described by Mr. Koenig, which was a team effort that provided the developer the same message from all facets of the City. She questioned why certain members of Council were attempting to micro-manage staff, explaining that Mr. Koenig was hired as the City Manager and that personnel is not the purview of Council. She suggested that members accept staff’s recommendation. Mr. Hare indicated his concurrence with the concerns of Mr. Lynn regarding the position being placed under the Planning Office. He explained his perspective that the economic development professional seeks businesses to come to the City and that it is not their responsibility to obtain the necessary permits, etc. He suggested that the individual should work with the Mayor and DEDO and should not be a part of the Planning Office. Mr. Anderson reminded members that in September 2011, he suggested that the EDO be relocated to the Mayor’s Office. At that time, it was decided that members should concentrate on the hiring of a City Manager. He suggested that his recommendation be reconsidered, noting that the Mayor’s Office is where the businesses are focused, and he stated the need for someone to advocate independently from other City departments. Mr. Anderson stated that technically, in accordance with the City Charter, if the economic development professional is under the City Manager’s charge, Council’s ability to interact with the professional could be restricted by the City Manager. He noted that if the position were under the charge of the Planning Office, this restriction would not exist. However, if the position were under the charge of the Mayor’s Office, he felt it would provide a unified voice for economic development. Mr. Anderson felt that there are sections of staff’s recommendation that have merit and suggested that staff reconsider the recommendation for consideration prior to the new budget year. He also relayed concern that staff’s recommendation in its current form could risk millions of dollars in State monies by making changes at this time. Mr. Bob Aellis, 29 Dornoch Way, Townshend, stated that, as a small business owner of Veterans Lighting and Firesigns 1075, approximately two (2) years ago, representatives from his company began working with Mr. Neaton and Mayor Carey to bring a Light-Emitting Diode (LED)

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 5 manufacturing company from Canada to Dover. He advised members that meetings were held with several representatives of New Castle County, Sussex County, DEDO, Senators Coons and Carper, and several other business persons and entities in an attempt to make the manufacturing facility come to fruition. It was Mr. Aeillis’ opinion that these meetings would not have been possible without the assistance of Mr. Neaton and the City’s EDO and that Mr. Neaton served as one of the best facilitators he has worked with. He noted that he has since worked with Mr. Neaton in attempts to bring other manufacturing facilities to the City of Dover to produce jobs. Mr. Aellis stated his feeling that the City’s EDO is “more than just dollars and cents and balance sheets.” He indicated that he is a member of the Delaware Economic Environmental Development (DEED) Committee, which has referred to the City’s EDO on numerous occasions and is currently in the process of requesting that Mr. Neaton speak with the DEED Committee. Mr. Aeillis urged members to maintain the City’s EDO as it currently is today. Mrs. Malone clarified her understanding that economic development is a part of the Mayor’s responsibility; however, she felt that Council should work with and assist the Mayor to promote economic development in the downtown area, as well as the entire City. Based on members’ comments during the past several meetings, Mr. Bonar suggested that staff go back to the “drawing board” regarding this issue. Referring to Mrs. Williams’ comments regarding micro-managing, Mr. Lynn stated that economic development is critically important to the City; therefore, he was not willing to abdicate his thoughts and have “blind faith” in the City Manager and provide him “carte blanche.” He explained that economic development promotes fiscal stability; its business activities create revenues that fund local services, and the cost and quality of life of every household in the City are directly dependent on the City’s local economic conditions. He did not consider his position to be one of micro- managing but an indication that he was performing the duty that he was elected to do, which is to preserve, maintain, and grow the City’s economy. It was his opinion that the budget issues facing the City could not be resolved by making “cuts” and suggested that it is necessary is for the City to “plant seeds” in order to grow its way out of the budget situation. Mrs. Williams felt that there was a duplication of economic development services provided by the State, County, and City. It was her feeling that there are more than enough economic development personnel to assist the City’s growth and that the City should not replicate the efforts of other entities. She suggested that the issue be given to the City Manager to handle. Mr. Hutchison stated that he worked on economic opportunity during his tenure as Mayor. He indicated that he was not an expert on economic development, but served as a contact person for the City and referred these matter to the experts within the City. Although he understood the importance of maintaining an economic development professional within the City, he explained the importance of the Mayor being a part of the economic development system. Mr. Anderson moved to recommend that staff’s recommendations regarding the EDO be returned to the City Manager for redevelopment, seconded by Mr. Shevock.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 6 Responding to Mr. Hare, Mr. Koenig confirmed that staff’s recommendations regarding this matter were initiated when the City was made aware of the desire of the DDP to hire their own Executive Director. It was his opinion that the only action necessary was for staff to provide a recommended effective date as to when the City’s EDO would no longer provide administrative support to the DDP. On a call for the question, the motion to recommend that staff’s recommendations regarding the (EDO) be returned to the City Manager for redevelopment was unanimously carried. Mr. Anderson moved to consider Agenda Item #3 prior to Agenda Item #2, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. Authorization to Purchase Virtual Server (Police Department) Chief Hosfelt presented a request to approve a sole vendor purchase of a Virtual Server/Storage Array at a cost of $42,600. Members reviewed detailed information regarding the concept of a virtual server system. Chief Hosfelt explained that migrating to virtual servers and consolidating the computer data storage in a storage array would yield many benefits and savings over time. The Police Department would be able to reduce their physical hardware footprint and hardware costs, power consumption costs, and possibly some software licensing costs if vendor licensing methods remain the same. Chief Hosfelt advised members that the purchase would be made from Dell, which is a State contract vendor source for computer hardware. He explained that it is necessary to purchase Dell equipment to ensure that the new hardware integrates and communicates properly with the other existing servers and storage hardware currently in use in the Police Department. Chief Hosfelt indicated that funds from three (3) grants would be combined for this purchase and no matching funds would be required of the City. Staff recommended approval of the sole vendor purchase from Dell for a Virtual Server/Storage Array at a cost of $42,600. Mr. Hare moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. Proposed Ordinance #2012-07 - Incentives for Redevelopment of Vacant Commercial Buildings Staff presented members with Proposed Ordinance #2012-07 which would allow for waiver of half of the building permit fee, half of the City water and wastewater impact fees, and tax abatement on the value of improvements for redevelopment of commercial buildings of 5,000 square feet or greater, located along Route 13, Bay Road, Court Street between Bay Road and Route 13, and Route 8 west of the railroad tracks. The proposed ordinance was modeled after the downtown redevelopment incentives.

LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012 PAGE 7 Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, advised members that, due to the economic downturn, municipalities in Delaware and elsewhere are offering waivers of certain fees to help spur economic growth. She noted that the proposed ordinance was drafted with a “sunset” date of December 31, 2015; therefore, incentives would be available for a finite period of time while the City attempts to encourage economic growth and filling commercial vacancies on the City’s primary commercial corridors. Mrs. Townshend indicated that the costs involved with this incentive would be associated with loss of revenue related to the waiver and are difficult to quantify, as they would depend upon the cost of specific commercial building renovations, changes in use that would require additional plumbing fixtures, and the demand for the incentives. Staff recommended that the proposed ordinance be forwarded to City Council for a First Reading on March 12, 2012 and for a Final Reading and Council Action on April 9, 2012. Mr. Shevock noted that the incentives would be restricted to certain areas of the City and although he understood the reasons for this, he suggested that the City consider offering the incentives to the entire City, reminding members that a sunset clause had been incorporated. Mr. Shevock moved to amend Proposed Ordinance #2012-07 to allow redevelopment incentives City-wide (removing Lines 17 and 18) and to recommend adoption of the ordinance as amended (Attachment #1). The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Mr. Shevock moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Meeting Adjourned at 6:53 P.M. William P. McGlumphy Chairman WPM/DD/jg/js/tm S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Minutes\2012\02-27-2012 LF&A.wpd Attachment to Original and File Copy Attachment #1 - Proposed Ordinance #2012-07 with LF&A Amendment No. 1 - Incentives for Redevelopment of Vacant Commercial Buildings

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE The Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Meeting was held on February 29, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. with Chairman Hutchison presiding. Members present were Mr. Lynn, Mr. Davis, and Mr. W. Hutchison. Mrs. Russell was absent. Councilman Hare and Mayor Carey were also present AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS Mr. Davis moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. W. Hutchison and unanimously carried. Presentation - Silver Lake to Isaacs Branch Trail Concept Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, provided members with a map depicting proposed bicycle/pedestrian improvements in the Silver Lake/Isaacs Branch area (Attachment #1). She reminded members that there is currently a concrete multi-use path that travels through Silver Lake Park and another path near Public Safety Boulevard, behind Winner Ford, that travels to Route 10 and is referred to as the Isaacs Branch segment. She advised members that the State has expressed an interest in connecting these two (2) trail systems with a St. Jones River Trail. Mrs. Townshend stated that in the last State Bond Bill, monies were earmarked for trails and, as a result, Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) and the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) have become very active in cultivating community trails. Mrs. Townshend indicated that both DNREC and DelDOT contacted the City regarding the possibility of conducting a study (concept plan) regarding a connection between these two (2) trails. Referring to the map, she reviewed a proposed phased project for the Silver Lake to Isaacs Branch Trail Concept, which would provide both recreational and transportation benefits for pedestrians and bicyclists. She noted that the long-term plan would involve several property owners, environmental issues, etc. Mrs. Townshend advised members that public workshops are planned to discuss the concept plan and she felt that this matter should be presented to the Committee for their information prior to the workshops. The Committee took no further action. Announcement of Road Closures (Gary Laing) Mr. Gary Laing, Community Relations Officer and Public Relations Liaison, Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), explained that DelDOT has scheduled several repaving projects in the next year and advised members that some of the work includes the City’s Historic District and involves curb ramps, road striping, etc. He assured members that DelDOT has complied with the mandate to notify residents regarding planned night work. Mr. Laing noted that very little response has been received in response to DelDOT’s notification, which clearly indicated that non-response from residents would be construed by DelDOT as consent. Mr. Laing stated that he was not aware of the construction schedule and, therefore, did not have a start date for the project. However, he noted that DelDOT takes certain events, such as Dover Days, NASCAR races, and holidays, into consideration when scheduling work and would not allow street closures during these times.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 29, 2012 PAGE 2 Chairman Hutchison requested that Mr. Laing provide staff with the details, including the exact dates and streets involved. Responding to Mr. W. Hutchison, Mr. Laing explained that roadways are constructed so that the water runs off toward the curb and into the drainage system and water can accumulate where American Disabilities Act (ADA) sidewalk ramps are located. He indicated that it is hoped that the drainage system will support the runoff of water; however, water can sometimes build up in these areas, particularly during heavy rains. Discussion - Establishing City Emergency Operations Center (January 23, 2012 - Committee Recommended Referral Back to Staff for a Report to the Committee at the Next Committee Meeting) During their meeting of January 23, 2012, members reviewed correspondence from Mr. Dave Truax, Fire Marshal, relaying his concerns regarding the City’s lack of emergency preparedness awareness (outside of emergency services and emergency management personnel) and the need for an operational Emergency Operations Center (EOC) in the City. After much discussion, the matter was referred back to staff for a report to the Committee at their next meeting. Mr. Scott Koenig, City Manager, provided members a brief history of the City’s Emergency Management Plan (approved by the Mayor in August 2010) and stated that he felt the basic plan would meet the City’s current needs, although modifications would be needed as the City moves forward. He advised members that there are updates in the text of the plan that need to become more “fluid” and noted that this has not occurred because the Emergency Management Coordinator retired and a replacement was not hired due to budgetary reasons. The current plan provides for the EOC to be located at City Hall, the designation of the City’s Police Department as a backup to the City Hall EOC, and the establishment of the Kent 911 Center as backup to the Police Department EOC. He stated that the City could also utilize the Electric Administration Building if necessary. Mr. Koenig advised members that the Delaware Emergency Management Agency (DEMA) uses guidelines entitled “Design Recommendations and Criteria for Emergency Operations” as a framework for designing their EOC and advised members of some of the criteria included. He indicated that keeping the EOC at City Hall would meet many of the requirements and that it would be nearly impossible to integrate an EOC into any building and have it meet all of the requirements. Mr. Koenig noted that City Hall has ample space that is readily accessible by employees, public officials, and the public and felt assured that the Police Department would not find it desirable for people (such as volunteers) to wander through their facility during a crisis event. In addition, he noted that City Hall has restrooms, kitchen facilities, and separate rooms for confidential meetings and briefings (which play an important role in the establishment of an EOC), and additional space for a sleeping area if deemed necessary. Mr. Koenig noted that the only shortcoming for the use of City Hall as the EOC is the lack of a backup power source. As a result, he suggested that a generator be installed at City Hall, which would produce enough power to run a portion of the building.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 29, 2012 PAGE 3 Mr. Koenig stated that during the design of the new Library, there was discussion regarding the concept of adding space for a designed and constructed EOC, at a cost of $500,000 to $1M. Staff felt that due to the costs, it was not possible to include an EOC and there was no further action taken to bring the matter to City Council. Mr. Koenig stated his opinion that it would be in the best interest of the City to assign City Hall as the primary EOC. He also suggested that City Council be requested to reassign emergency management duties to a specific individual within the City’s organization. He advised members that this request will be presented to the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee during their next meeting scheduled for March 12, 2012. Responding to Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Koenig indicated that upon the retirement of the City’s Emergency Management Coordinator, his duties were dispersed among three (3) employees: the Public Affairs Coordinator, the Public Services Manager, and the City Manager. He recommended that all responsibilities be assigned to the Public Affairs Coordinator. In response to Mr. Davis, Mr. Koenig stated that the generator is currently being stored at the Warehouse and that the electrical engineers have estimated connection costs at $15,000 to $50,000, depending upon the need for a new pad. He indicated that he had not resolved to use that particular generator at this time; however, staff would continue to review this matter and will likely include a recommendation as part of the budget preparation for next fiscal year. At the request of Mr. Hutchison, Chief Hosfelt indicated his support for the recommendations presented by the City Manager. Mr. Lynn moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation to establish City Hall as the City’s designated Emergency Operations Center (EOC), with the Dover Police Department to serve as the backup EOC, and the Kent County 911 Center to serve as the City’s temporary (alternate) backup to the Police Department. The motion was seconded by Mr. Davis and unanimously carried. Proposed Ordinance - #2012-06 Creating a New Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew Mr. Hare reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 - Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew and explained that the proposed ordinance mimics the City of Milford’s juvenile curfew ordinance. He noted that the proposal was the result of his participation in numerous “ride alongs” with the Dover Police Department. Mr. Hare felt that there was no reason for individuals under the age of 17 to be out in the late night/early morning hours. During his “ride alongs,” he observed several 13 to 14-year-olds walking the streets at 2:00 a.m. When questioned by the police, these juveniles indicated that they would be going home, only to be observed walking the streets again at 3:00 a.m. or 4:00 a.m. He advised members that the police indicated that they have no authority to take action in this regard. Referring to the comments submitted by Mrs. Russell, dated February 29, 2012 (Attachment #2), Mr. Hare advised members that his observations were made in various areas throughout the City and not just in the Fourth District. He indicated that the State of Delaware does not have a curfew law.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 29, 2012 PAGE 4 Mr. Hare felt that the proposed ordinance includes provisions that would allow a juvenile with legitimate reasons to be out late in the evening or early morning hours and addresses other concerns that may be raised. Responding to Mr. W. Hutchison, Chief Hosfelt indicated that the proposed ordinance would provide police officers a useful tool and he did not feel that enforcement would place a burden on the Police Department. Mr. Lynn moved to recommend adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 - Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew, seconded by Mr. W. Hutchison and unanimously carried. Proposed Ordinance #2012-08 Amending Chapter 70 - Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions Mr. Lynn presented Proposed Ordinance #2012-08, which would amend Chapter 70 - Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions, by prohibiting registered Tier II and Tier III sex offenders from living or working within 500 feet of a daycare center and from participating in certain events involving children. He advised members that constituents in the White Oak/Towne Point area approached him regarding their concerns related to a home that had been occupied by multiple sex offenders and was located in close proximity to a daycare center. Mr. Lynn advised members of a situation that occurred in the City of Wilmington whereby a daycare center moved near a residence occupied by multiple sex offenders (Harriet Tubman Safe House). The City of Wilmington police attempted to enforce the prohibition against sex offenders living near a school, which would have forced the sex offenders to move. He noted that the State statute indicates that sex offenders may not reside or work within 500 feet of a school; however, he explained his interpretation that the term “school” does not include daycare centers. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) litigated the Harriet Tubman case and stated they felt that the provisions regarding schools, as indicated in the State statute, do not refer to daycare centers. Mr. Lynn explained that the practical effect of the ACLU’s argument is that more protection is afforded to children from five (5) to 18 years of age than children zero (0) to five (5) years of age, although he suggested that this may not have been the General Assembly’s intent. As a result, Mr. Lynn felt that the City should address the issue to resolve any problems and protect the safety of the children within the City of Dover. In researching the matter, Mr. Lynn stated that there is a “routine activity” theory (developed in 1979 by Marcus Felson and Lawrence E. Cohen) which indicates that for crimes to occur, three (3) conditions must exist: 1) the presence of a motivated offender; 2) access to a potential victim; and 3) absence of capable guardians to prevent criminal activity. Applying this to sex offender residence restrictions would suggest that predatory or pedophiliac sex offenders are most likely to commit new assaults against children when they have unrestricted or unmonitored access to them. Thus, living in close proximity to schools or other places known to cater to children might increase opportunities for sex offenders to have contact with children or view children playing, thus reinforcing their already sexually deviant preferences and facilitating child sexual abuse.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 29, 2012 PAGE 5 Mr. Lynn stated that although there have not been many studies conducted regarding recidivism rates and close proximity to daycare centers and schools, he located a study conducted by Dr. Paul Zandbergen (available at www.paulzandbergen.com), which indicates that evidence was not conclusive that the residential restrictions have any effect on recidivism rates; however, Dr. Zandbergen noted that there were limitations to his study. Specifically, he noted that the sample size was diluted by the inclusion of low-level sex offenders. Mr. Lynn explained that the State of Delaware and General Assembly determined that it was not desirable to have sex offenders living or working within 500 feet of schools and, as such, this same protection should be provided to children aged zero (0) to five (5) years of age. He noted that the proposed ordinance amendment applies only to Tier II and Tier III sex offenders and only to commercial daycare centers (in-home daycare centers would not be included). He also noted that any sex offenders affected by the amendment would have one (1) year to comply. Referring to the comments submitted by Mrs. Russell (see Attachment #2), Mr. Lynn stated that if a daycare center were to open next to a sex offender’s residence, the sex offender would have one (1) year to relocate, the same timeframe would apply to offenders who currently reside within the specified distance of a daycare center. According to his discussions with Chief Hosfelt, the Police Department would be able to handle enforcement of the proposed ordinance. Mr. Lynn explained that the proposed ordinance does not include home daycare centers because their inclusion would prohibit sex offenders from living almost anywhere in the City of Dover. He assured members that the proposed ordinance does not violate State law. Chief Hosfelt introduced Cpl. Harvey Jaksch and Cpl. Mickie Price, who serve as the Sex Offenders Unit for the City of Dover Police Department. He explained that the number of sex offenders changes daily and that it is estimated that there are 10 sex offenders in the City that the proposed ordinance would affect currently. He stated that there are 192 Tier II and Tier III sex offenders and a total of 213 sex offenders in the City of Dover. Chief Hosfelt stated that the monitoring practices employed by the City’s Sex Offenders Unit far exceed State requirements. Chief Hosfelt stated that, after researching sample ordinances throughout the nation, staff determined that similar ordinances have included language concerning holidays (such as wearing costumes, distributing candy, etc.). It was staff’s opinion that the City’s ordinance should include such language as well; therefore, it was incorporated in the proposed ordinance (see Prohibited Activities for Sexual Offenders). Responding to Mr. Hutchison, Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, clarified that although drafts of the proposed ordinance were submitted to the City Solicitor’s Office for review, the final draft has not been reviewed at this time. Mrs. Traci McDowell, City Clerk, indicated that once a recommendation is formulated by the Committee, staff would forward the draft ordinance to the City Solicitor for final review prior to Council action. Mr. Lynn advised members that copies of the proposed ordinance have also been forwarded to the Attorney General’s Office for their review and comment.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 29, 2012 PAGE 6 Mrs. Townshend stated that a map depicting the commercial daycare centers within the City was available. Chief Hosfelt stated that there are currently 35 commercial daycare centers and 63 in-home daycare centers. Mr. Lynn moved to recommend adoption of Proposed Ordinance #2012-08 - Chapter 70 - Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions, seconded by Mr. Davis and unanimously carried. Update - Dover High School Construction Mrs. Ann Marie Townshend, Director of Planning and Community Development, reminded members that during their previous meeting there was much discussion regarding the new Dover High School’s east entrance (which lines up with Heatherfield East), which had been planned as a signalized intersection with a pedestrian crossing. She reminded members that the most recent comments received from the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) were extremely adamant that their traffic section opposes a signal in this location. She stated that the City Manager sent a letter to Secretary Bhatt, as directed, to relay support for the signalization of the east entrance intersection and a pedestrian crossing. Staff received a response from Secretary Bhatt indicating that the letter was received and forwarded to appropriate staff. If a positive response is not received, she anticipated the need for the City to seek assistance from legislators. Mr. Gary Laing, Community Relations Officer and Public Relations Liaison, DelDOT, stated that he spoke with the Director of Traffic regarding this matter and advised members that the Capital School District had conducted a traffic study for a signal at the west entrance, where the warrants were met. He advised members that in order for a signal to be installed, the intersection must meet warrants and that the installation of signals involves liability issues. In response to Mr. Lynn, Mrs. Townshend stated that a signal was proposed for the east entrance on the plan documents that were submitted and approved by the Planning Commission. She assured members that DelDOT was included in development meetings with the developer for the Dover High School project. Responding to Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Laing stated that the DelDOT Director of Traffic has recommended that the Capital School District request another study. He stated that it is not unusual for a development site plan that is submitted to a municipality or other governmental organization to include a traffic signal; however, that does not commit DelDOT to install the signal, since a study would not have been completed to determine whether or not a signal is warranted. Mr. Hutchison requested that staff reach out to all involved parties in an attempt to resolve this matter and that the City submit a request for a study. Mr. Davis moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Lynn and unanimously carried.

SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 29, 2012 PAGE 7 Meeting Adjourned at 6:04 P.M. James L. Hutchison Chairman JLH/TM/jg/js/dd S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Minutes\2012\02-29-2012 SA&T.wpd Attachments Attachment #1 - Map Depicting the Proposed Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements Attachment #2 - Comments of Mrs. Russell, dated February 29, 2012

ATTACHMENT #1 SA&T Committee Meeting of February 29, 2012 City Of Dover Proposed Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements DNREC MURPHEY SCHOOL BAY HEALTH SILVER LAKE PARK KE DU OF RK YO W IL ST STATE ARCHIVES CITY OF EET E. LI E ST R RE DOVER STA TE W AM AT T ER PE R NN ST ST DRI VE WIDEN EXISTING PARK SIDEWALK EE E RE CK BAY HEALTH T SA T DI AR VI CITY OF DOVER AC CAPITOL POLICE ON SI 13 HOLY CROSS E N KI NEW TRAIL .L O ST E O AV CK T E REE NU R M E A NEW TRAIL N ST SOUTH DOVER R ELEMENTARY E E T LANDS OF LOPER FAMILY COURT S COURT LANDS OF ARELLANO RIVER R TREET CAPITAL GREEN OA PI NE D LO E. W A T ER ST TU RE SS ET TR EE S T RE E T T ATTACHMENT #1 13 U.S ROUTE 13 SB U.S ROUTE 13 NB SAF ETY BLVD. LEGEND WINNER FORD EXISTING BIKE/PED TRAIL IC PHASE 1 BL PU PHASE 2 POTENTIAL FUTURE PHASE 113 0' 200' 400' SA&T Committee Meeting of February 29, 2012 February 2012

ATTACHMENT #2 SA&T Committee Meeting of February 29, 2012 February 29, 2012 I am unable to attend tonight’s Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting; however, I would like to express my opinion regarding Agenda Item #4A, Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 Creating a New Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew, and Agenda Item #4B, Proposed Ordinance #2012-08 Amending Chapter 70 - Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions. 4A. Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 Creating a New Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew I do not support this Proposed Ordinance. I believe that this ordinance would place an undue burden on the parents of the children who violate it. Many parents work jobs or hours that make it difficult for them to monitor their children all the time. Additionally, I believe that every child should be treated consistently and that this ordinance allows for each case to be handled at the discretion of the police officer. I am also concerned because I believe that this Proposed Ordinance will negatively impact residents in the 4th District. I would like staff to provide answers to the following questions: • Does the State have a curfew law? • If the State does not have a curfew law, then why is it necessary for the City to develop a curfew law? • What are the consequences if the parent is unable to pay the fines? 4B. Proposed Ordinance #2012-08 Amending Chapter 70 - Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions I do not agree with this Proposed Ordinance. I personally believe that those individuals who are required to register with the State as sex offenders have paid their debt to society and should not be continuously punished for their crime. In regard to youth who are convicted sex offenders, I believe that the labeling of these individuals prevents them from obtaining employment and increases the chance that they will develop drug and alcohol problems. If sex offenders register with the State, follow all established rules and regulations, and pay their taxes, I believe that is enough. It is my opinion that this Proposed Ordinance will negatively impact many residents in the 4th District. In addition, I am not sure that this type of legislation will solve the problem, because there are so many exceptions to the rules. For example, I previously spoke with the Chief of Police regarding a registered sex offender living across the street from Booker T. Washington Elementary School and next to a home daycare center, and he informed me that sex offenders are classified according to different levels. He explained that this particular offender was not prohibited from communication with young children because the nature of his original offense did not involve youth. I would like staff to provide answers to the following questions: • What if a registered offender has signed a lease and established residency, and then a daycare center opens? • How will the City enforce this ordinance for those sex offenders who are now in violation? • Will the Police Department be able to handle the enforcement of this ordinance? • Why does this not address home daycare centers? • Are we in violation of the State laws pertaining to this matter? Respectfully, Sophia R. Russell, Fourth District Representative

CITY OF DOVER FINANCE & CENTRAL SERVICES DEPARTMENTS MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT JANUARY 2012 PREPARED BY: FINANCE DEPARTMENT PLEASE NOTE – THIS REPORT PROVIDES TOP LINE INFORMATION ON THE THREE MAJOR OPERATING FUNDS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT.

Page 2 of 11 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Budget Report January 2012 S Strategic Objectives for Fiscal Year 2011 – 2012 1. Coordinate audit program with the Legislative, Finance & Administrative Committee. 2. Fortis training and implementation for Payroll and Accounts Payable. 3. Each Staff Member will take three in-house Sungard training sessions. ACTIVITY LEVELS FY11 YTD FY12 YTD BANK TRENDS Number of Deposits Made 1,972 2,973 Total Amount of All Deposits $ 90,472,388 $ 93,489,779 PAYROLL Hours % Amount Hours % Amount Gross wages per registers 560,429 100.0% $ 12,591,416 548,696 100.0% $ 13,114,572 Wages and Hours Worked Regular 465,559 83.1% $ 9,951,667 461,558 84.1% $ 10,050,589 All over time 22,049 3.9% $ 905,834 21,149 3.9% $ 954,745 Other Paid or Unpaid Wages and Hours Vacation 36,500 6.5% $ 928,775 35,353 6.4% $ 1,153,017 Sick 11,200 2.0% $ 257,354 14,394 2.6% $ 359,805 Furlough (July 2010) 1,482 0.3% $ - - 0.0% $ - Terminal Leave - Retiree Vacation/Sick Payout 3,220 0.6% $ 91,298 7,702 1.4% $ 262,642 Comp Time (Police) 4,406 0.8% $ 139,481 6,196 1.1% $ 181,700 Personal 785 0.1% $ 22,076 791 0.1% $ 20,959 Leave Without Pay 2,399 0.4% $ - - 0.0% $ - Other (description below) 12,807 2.3% $ 294,931 1,554 0.3% $ 131,116 Other includes: pay adjustments, military differential pay, committee meetings, worker compensation tracking/adjustments, etc. Other Activity Number of Pay Periods 16 16 Number of Payroll Checks & Direct Deposits Issued 6,555 6,156 Number of Pension Checks Issued 1,668 1,673 Total Pension Benefits Paid - Defined Benefit Plan $ 2,646,116 $ 2,716,295 Payroll Checks & Direct Deposits issued: number of payroll checks issued for FY 2010 includes separate checks for shoe allowance & clothing allowance. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Number of Check Vouchers 3,781 3,498 Number of EFT Vouchers 1,207 1,257 Vouchers Dollar Amount Disbursed $ 58,215,528 $ 53,315,202

Page 3 of 11 CENTRAL SERVICES JANUARY 2012REPORT S t o c k P urc ha s e s by F und Items on Hand w ith no Usage ov er 36 Months $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $1,000,000 $800,000 $ 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 $600,000 $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $400,000 $200,000 $0 Jan-11 Feb- M ar- A pr-11 M ay- Jun-11 Jul-11 A ug- Sep- Oct-11 No v- Dec- Jan- J a n F e b M a r A pr M a y J un J ul A ug S e p O c t N o v D e c J a n 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Electric Water General E le c t ric Wa t e r G e ne ra l Funds C o nt ing ency & W ar eho use St o ck Electric: $33,267 Water: $7,183 $3 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2,700 2,600 General: $5,262 2,500 $2 ,50 0 ,0 0 0 2,400 2,300 2,200 $2 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 , 10 0 2,000 $1,50 0 ,0 0 0 1, 9 0 0 1, 8 0 0 Fuel Use Unleaded: 10,332.1 gallons 1, 7 0 0 $1, 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 1, 6 0 0 1, 5 0 0 Diesel: 6,829.0 gallons 1, 4 0 0 $50 0 ,0 0 0 1, 3 0 0 Total: $ 49,379 D ec F eb Apr Jun A ug O ct D ec 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 T o t al D o ll ar V alue T o t al Line I t ems Total Dollar Value: $2,486,742 Total Line Items: 1,491 Major Program Updates Measure January 12 FY End 2011 Difference Issue Effectiveness – How often the warehouse has what the FY to date 99.23% +0.49% customer needs when it is 99.72% needed. Turn Over Rate (4-5 per year) – Indicates that the material FY to date stocked is the material being 1 every 14.42 years -2.51 years 1 every 11.91 years used. Bids for non-inventory items converted to purchase orders FY to date within timeframe. (Quantity and 11 out of 12 – 91.67% +8.33% 3 out of 3 – 100% Percentage) Sealed bids prepared, received & distributed within 7 working FY to date days of receipt. (Quantity and 36 out of 38 – 94.7% -2.4% 12 out of 13 – 92.3% Percentage) Mail receiving lowest discounted FY to date rate. (Quantity and Percentage) 399,185 pieces – 181,120 pieces – +0.7% 95.96% 96.66%

Page 4 of 11 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2012 General Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance (Unaudited) $ 3,322,305 $ 3,322,305 $ 3,561,837 $ (239,532) 107.2% Revenues Court of Chancery Fees 690,000 690,000 321,400 368,600 46.6% Fines & Police Revenues 939,000 939,000 639,809 299,191 68.1% Franchise Fees 520,000 520,000 222,752 297,248 42.8% Grants 753,500 833,373 288,703 544,670 34.6% Intrafund Services 4,359,171 4,359,171 2,378,878 1,980,293 54.6% Library & Recreation Revenues 587,000 587,000 401,791 185,209 68.4% Licenses & Permits 2,457,675 2,457,675 2,075,502 382,173 84.4% Property Taxes (Includes BID Revenue) (1) 11,185,188 11,185,188 10,933,156 252,032 97.7% Sanitation Revenues 2,050,000 2,050,000 1,132,567 917,433 55.2% Other Miscellaneous Revenues 381,650 381,650 107,533 274,117 28.2% Garrison Farm Rent Revenue 87,000 87,000 61,890 25,110 71.1% Transfers-In from Special Funds & Utilities Civil Traffic Penalties 1,000,000 1,000,000 360,531 639,469 36.1% Municipal Street Aid Fund 526,814 526,814 527,412 (598) 100.1% Transfer Taxes 900,000 900,000 963,257 (63,257) 107.0% Water/Wastewater Fund 424,508 424,508 200,000 224,508 47.1% Electric Fund 7,876,288 7,876,288 4,000,000 3,876,288 50.8% Total Revenues 34,737,794 34,817,667 24,615,181 10,202,486 70.7% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 38,060,099 $ 38,139,972 $ 28,177,018 $ 9,962,954 73.9% Expenditures City Clerk & Council $ 417,092 $ 417,092 $ 196,181 $ 220,911 47.0% Mayor, City Manager & Human Resources 1,088,039 1,088,039 576,490 511,549 53.0% Police & Police Extra Duty 13,386,407 13,386,407 7,553,889 5,832,518 56.4% Public Services 4,566,400 4,646,273 2,542,185 2,104,088 54.7% Central Services 2,341,454 2,341,454 1,336,647 1,004,807 57.1% Planning & Inspections 1,934,120 1,934,120 1,106,475 827,645 57.2% Finance, Info Tech & Customer Services 2,466,266 2,466,266 1,383,391 1,082,875 56.1% Library & Recreation 1,948,788 1,948,788 1,075,306 873,482 55.2% Fire Department 684,725 684,725 423,695 261,030 61.9% Assessor 213,175 213,175 108,119 105,056 50.7% Insurance 550,000 550,000 381,025 168,975 69.3% OPEB - Retiree’s Health Care Contribution 1,374,709 1,374,709 687,353 687,356 50.0% Police Pension Trust Contribution - State Grant 620,000 620,000 165,375 454,625 26.7% Appropriation to Pension Fund 1,545,000 1,545,000 1,045,000 500,000 67.6% Street Lights 960,000 960,000 580,500 379,500 60.5% Debt Service 327,270 327,270 303,400 23,870 92.7% Provision for Uncollectible 10,000 10,000 10,000 - 100.0% Transfers Out Capital Asset Reserve 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 100.0% Capital Projects Fund 623,847 623,847 623,847 - 100.0% Total Expenditures 35,257,292 35,337,165 20,298,878 15,038,287 57.4% Budget Balance - Working Capital 2,802,807 2,802,807 - 2,802,807 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenditures $ 38,060,099 $ 38,139,972 $ 20,298,878 $ 17,841,094 53.2% Reserve Balances Contingency $ 725,554 $ 711,747 $ 718,084 (1) Property Taxes are the taxes billed and not cash received. The outstanding receivable balance as of 01/31/12 is $684,978.96 as compared to $642,187.58 in January 2011.

Page 5 of 11 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2012 Water/Wastewater Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Water (Unaudited) $ 2,385,027 $ 2,385,027 $ 2,567,172 $ (182,145) 107.6% Beginning Balance - Wastewater (Unaudited) $ 1,741,242 $ 1,741,242 $ 1,931,514 $ (190,272) 110.9% Beginning Balance - Kent County Treatment (Unaudited) $ (1,757,484) $ (1,757,484) $ (1,243,243) $ (514,241) 70.7% 2,368,785 2,368,785 3,255,443 (886,658) 137.4% Revenues Water Fees 4,603,400 4,603,400 2,897,188 1,706,212 62.9% Wastewater Fees 3,756,700 3,756,700 2,229,693 1,527,007 59.4% Kent County Treatment Fees 3,090,900 3,090,900 1,840,625 1,250,275 59.5% Ground Water Adjustment Fees 1,386,900 1,386,900 721,909 664,991 52.1% Water Tank Leases 307,600 307,600 168,923 138,677 54.9% Miscellaneous 85,800 85,800 55,097 30,703 64.2% Impact Fees - Water 323,000 323,000 190,000 133,000 58.8% Impact Fees - Wastewater 357,000 357,000 212,100 144,900 59.4% Total Revenues 13,911,300 13,911,300 8,315,535 5,595,765 59.8% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 16,280,085 $ 16,280,085 $ 11,570,978 $ 4,709,107 71.1% Expenses Water/Wastewater Operating Divisions Engineering & Inspection $ 622,230 $ 622,230 $ 278,880 $ 343,350 44.8% Water 382,655 382,655 222,906 159,749 58.3% Water Treatment Plant 1,543,114 1,543,114 810,959 732,155 52.6% Wastewater 959,735 959,735 514,617 445,118 53.6% Construction & Inspection 440,088 440,088 203,255 236,833 46.2% Kent County Treatment Fees 4,235,400 4,235,400 2,275,736 1,959,664 53.7% Intrafund Services 1,228,596 1,228,596 627,865 600,731 51.1% OPEB - Retiree’s Health Care Contribution 190,830 190,830 95,416 95,414 50.0% Pension Unfunded Liability 228,400 228,400 114,200 114,200 50.0% Debt Service 736,936 736,936 318,139 418,797 43.2% Inventory/Fixed Asset Write-offs 10,000 10,000 10,000 - 100.0% Transfers Out General Fund 424,508 424,508 200,000 224,508 47.1% Uncollectible Reserve 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 100.0% Contingency Reserve 8,000 8,000 8,000 - 100.0% Water I & E Fund 750,000 750,000 750,000 - 100.0% Wastewater I & E Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 100.0% Capital Asset Reserve - Water 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 100.0% Capital Asset Reserve - Wastewater 300,000 300,000 300,000 - 100.0% Impact Fee Reserve - Water 36,147 36,147 - 36,147 0.0% Total Expenses 13,201,639 13,201,639 7,834,973 5,366,666 59.3% Budget Balances Budget Balance - Working Capital - Water 2,738,400 2,738,400 - 2,738,400 0.0% Budget Balance - Working Capital - WW 1,855,130 1,855,130 - 1,855,130 0.0% Budget Balance-Working Capital - KSA (1,515,084) (1,515,084) - (1,515,084) 0.0% Total Budget Balances 3,078,446 3,078,446 - 3,078,446 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 16,280,085 $ 16,280,085 $ 7,834,973 $ 8,445,112 48.1% Reserve Balances Contingency-Water $ 130,696 $ 136,680 $ 101,537 Contingency-Wastewater $ 146,149 $ 152,839 $ 184,497 Impact Fee Reserve - Sewer NO BUDGET NO BUDGET $ 3,349,696 Impact Fee Reserve - Water NO BUDGET NO BUDGET $ 380,193 Bond Coverage Ratio (Covenant 1.20) 5.39 4.47 7.42

Page 6 of 11 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2012 Electric Revenue Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance (Unaudited) $ 11,867,003 $ 11,867,003 $ 12,440,550 $ (573,547) 104.8% Revenues Sales to Customers 95,675,500 95,675,500 59,256,214 36,419,286 61.9% Purchased Power Adjustment - Credit (6,012,000) (6,012,000) (3,748,116) (2,263,884) 62.3% Utility Tax 1,966,100 1,966,100 943,454 1,022,646 48.0% Weyandt Hall Rents 225,000 225,000 85,496 139,504 38.0% Miscellaneous Revenues 1,048,000 1,048,000 783,640 264,360 74.8% Interest Earned 264,900 264,900 84,554 180,346 31.9% Transfer from Rate Stabilization 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 100.0% Intrafund Service Receipts Water/Wastewater 240,203 240,203 99,997 140,206 41.6% Total Revenues 94,407,703 94,407,703 58,505,239 35,902,464 62.0% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 106,274,706 $ 106,274,706 $ 70,945,789 $ 35,328,917 66.8% Expenses Power Supply & Generation Power Supply $ 42,047,430 $ 42,047,430 $ 26,162,558 $ 15,884,872 62.2% Power Supply Management/Incentive 1,170,000 1,170,000 581,000 589,000 49.7% Capacity Charges 8,506,512 8,506,512 4,801,381 3,705,131 56.4% PJM Charges - Load 15,043,396 15,043,396 7,051,985 7,991,411 46.9% Total Power Supply 66,767,338 66,767,338 38,596,924 28,170,414 57.8% Plant Operations 5,964,817 5,964,817 2,905,481 3,059,336 48.7% Generation Fuels 664,641 664,641 1,355,251 (690,610) 203.9% Capacity Credits (7,388,283) (7,388,283) (3,759,970) (3,628,313) 50.9% PJM Credits (1,285,675) (1,285,675) (3,365,049) 2,079,374 261.7% Total Generation (2,044,500) (2,044,500) (2,864,287) 819,787 140.1% Total Power Supply & Plant 64,722,838 64,722,838 35,732,637 28,990,201 55.2% Electric Operating Divisions: Transmission/Distribution 3,162,026 3,162,026 1,607,748 1,554,278 50.8% Electrical Engineering 1,177,060 1,177,060 538,830 638,230 45.8% Administration 602,715 602,715 374,970 227,745 62.2% Meter Reading 215,208 215,208 115,619 99,589 53.7% Systems Operations 473,895 473,895 284,077 189,818 59.9% Intrafund Services 3,370,778 3,370,778 1,851,010 1,519,768 54.9% Utility Tax 1,966,100 1,966,100 943,454 1,022,646 48.0% OPEB Trust Contribution - Unfunded Liability 1,115,300 1,115,300 1,115,300 - 100.0% OPEB - Retirees Health Care Contribution 646,510 646,510 323,256 323,254 50.0% Pension Trust Contribution - Unfunded liability 1,110,500 1,110,500 555,250 555,250 50.0% Interest on Deposits 54,500 54,500 12,552 41,948 23.0% Green Energy Payment to DEMEC 129,000 129,000 78,184 50,816 60.6% Accounts Receivable Write-Offs 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 100.0% Inventory Write-Offs 175,000 175,000 175,000 - 100.0% Contractual Services Power Supply 115,000 115,000 - 115,000 0.0% Debt Service 3,336,800 3,336,800 1,966,873 1,369,927 58.9% Transfers Out: General Fund 7,876,288 7,876,288 4,000,000 3,876,288 50.8% Electric Improvement & Extension Fund 3,500,000 3,500,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 42.9% Total Expenses 93,899,518 93,899,518 51,324,760 42,574,758 54.7% Budget Balance - Working Capital 12,375,188 12,375,188 - 12,375,188 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenses $ 106,274,706 $ 106,274,706 $ 51,324,760 $ 54,949,946 48.3% Reserve Balances Contingency Reserve $ 1,110,496 $ 1,056,789 $ 1,066,198 Insurance Reserve $ 350,000 $ 344,905 $ 335,811 Rate Stabilization Reserve $ 5,406,419 $ 5,346,768 $ 5,207,875 Bond Coverage Ratio (Covenant 1.25) 2.07 2.07 5.48 Megawatt Hours Sold & Purchased Sales to Customers MWh (excluding Street Light MWh) 707,536 707,536 437,349 Sales per MWh $ 129.688 $ 129.688 $ 129.256 Purchased/Generated MWh 738,215 738,215 442,546 All In MWh Supply & Generation $ 87.675 $ 87.675 $ 80.743

Page 7 of 11 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2012 General Capital Project Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Projects (Unaudited) $ 195,191 $ 195,191 $ 236,392 $ (41,201) 121.1% Beginning Balance - Library $ - $ 100,962 $ 100,962 $ - 100.0% Revenues Transfer from General Fund for Projects 623,847 623,847 623,847 - 100.0% State Grant - Library 5,597,505 7,422,183 1,467,775 5,954,408 19.8% Miscellaneous Receipts - - 23,870 (23,870) 0.0% Library Bond Issue/Contributions 2,334,889 4,184,961 500,000 3,684,961 11.9% Loan Proceeds - Street Projects & City Hall (1) 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 0.0% Transfer from Library Reserve 3,262,615 2,590,784 2,594,860 (4,076) 100.2% Interest Earnings 10,900 10,900 7,209 3,691 66.1% Income from Sale of Assets - - 36,701 (36,701) 0.0% Total Revenues 13,829,756 16,832,675 5,254,262 11,578,413 31.2% Total Beginning Balance & Revenue $ 14,024,947 $ 17,128,828 $ 5,591,616 $ 11,537,212 32.6% Expenditures Fire $ 244,820 $ 244,820 $ 216,794 $ 28,026 88.6% Library 11,195,009 14,298,890 4,171,226 10,127,664 29.2% Recreation 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 0.0% Police 65,000 65,000 23,410 41,590 36.0% Streets (1) 1,230,027 230,027 2,206 227,821 1.0% Sanitation 136,500 136,500 - 136,500 0.0% Information Technology 6,400 6,400 5,204 1,196 81.3% Facilities Management - 220,000 - 220,000 0.0% Loan Issuance Costs - 30,000 - 30,000 0.0% Transfer to Capital Asset Reserve - - 27,638 (27,638) 0.0% Transfer Out to CT Fund-Streets - 1,750,000 - 1,750,000 0.0% Total Expenditures 12,907,756 17,011,637 4,446,478 12,565,159 26.1% Budget Balance - Bond Proceeds 1,000,000 - - - 0.0% Budget Balance - Projects 117,191 117,191 - 117,191 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenditures $ 14,024,947 $ 17,128,828 $ 4,446,478 $ 12,682,350 26.0% Reserve Balances Capital Asset Replacement Reserve $ 464,145 $ 460,920 $ 484,894 Library Reserve $ - $ - $ - Parkland/Recreation $ 197,272 $ 201,422 $ 198,423 (1) Street program - Budget includes $2 million for street repaving and City Hall improvements to be completed over two years (FY12 & FY13). Will be funded by bond issue or commercial bank loan.

Page 8 of 11 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2012 Water/Wastewater Improvement & Extension Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance - Water (Unaudited) $ 1,139,872 $ 1,139,872 $ 1,537,774 $ (397,902) 134.9% Beginning Balance - Wastewater (Unaudited) $ 303,476 $ 303,476 $ 339,673 $ (36,197) 111.9% Revenues Interest Earned - - 17,816 (17,816) 0.0% State Loan-Water - 1,923,489 1,819,333 104,156 94.6% State Loan-Wastewater 2009 1,800,000 1,621,272 787,433 833,839 48.6% State Loan-Wastewater 2011 - 765,060 - 765,060 0.0% Transfer from Water Operating Fund for Water 750,000 750,000 750,000 - 100.0% Transfer from Wastewater Operating Fund for Wastewater 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 100.0% Transfer from Impact Fee Reserve - Wastewater 262,840 867,032 760,270 106,762 87.7% Total Revenues 3,812,840 6,926,853 5,134,852 1,792,001 74.1% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 5,256,188 $ 8,370,201 $ 7,012,299 $ 1,357,902 83.8% Expenses Water $ 766,240 $ 3,086,468 $ 1,916,062 $ 1,170,406 62.1% Wastewater 3,404,900 4,217,976 1,188,092 3,029,884 28.2% Water Treatment Plant 22,900 22,900 22,898 2 100.0% Water Construction 30,100 30,100 29,985 115 99.6% Total Expenses 4,224,140 7,357,444 3,157,037 4,200,407 74.7% Budget Balance - Working Capital - Water 1,070,632 673,893 - 673,893 0.0% Budget Balance - Working Capital - Wastewater (38,584) 338,864 - 338,864 0.0% Total Budget Balances 1,032,048 1,012,757 - 1,012,757 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 5,256,188 $ 8,370,201 $ 3,157,037 $ 5,213,164 37.7% Reserve Balances Capital Asset Replacement - Water $ 452,146 $ 431,777 $ 425,263 Capital Asset Replacement - Wastewater $ 473,524 $ 473,020 $ 471,604

Page 9 of 11 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2012 Electric Improvement & Extension Fund Summary Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance (Unaudited) $ 2,561,096 $ 2,648,141 $ 3,175,375 $ (527,234) 119.9% Revenues Interest Earnings 38,400 38,400 15,810 22,590 41.2% Transfer from Electric Revenue Fund 3,500,000 3,500,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 42.9% Transfer from Insurance Stabilization 70,730 70,730 70,730 - 100.0% Transfer from Depreciation Reserve 300,000 300,000 300,000 - 100.0% Total Revenues 3,909,130 3,909,130 1,886,540 2,022,590 48.3% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 6,470,226 $ 6,557,271 $ 5,061,915 $ 1,495,356 77.2% Expenses Power Plant $ 1,810,410 $ 1,897,455 $ 355,042 $ 1,542,413 18.7% Transmission/Distribution 648,337 648,337 309,397 338,940 47.7% Electrical Engineering 1,790,716 1,790,716 1,023,565 767,151 57.2% Meter Reading 20,000 20,000 - 20,000 0.0% Total Expenses 4,269,463 4,356,508 1,688,004 2,668,504 38.7% Budget Balance - Working Capital 2,200,763 2,200,763 - 2,200,763 0.0% Total Budget Balance & Expenses $ 6,470,226 $ 6,557,271 $ 1,688,004 $ 4,869,267 25.7% Reserve Balances Depreciation Reserve $ 10,018,155 $ 9,918,621 $ 9,700,066 Future Capacity Reserve $ 10,073,428 $ 9,957,571 $ 9,763,217

Page 10 of 11 City of Dover Finance Department Monthly Report – January 2012 Community Transportation Improvement Fund Revised 58% of Budget Budget YTD Balance Budget Beginning Balance (Unaudited) $ 312,651 $ 312,651 $ 435,160 $ (122,509) 139.2% Revenues Grants Revenue 1,900,000 1,900,000 166,627 1,733,373 8.8% Transfer In Loan Proceeds - 1,750,000 - 1,750,000 0.0% Interest Earned 2,800 2,800 209 2,591 7.5% Total Revenues 1,902,800 3,652,800 166,836 3,485,964 4.6% Total Beginning Balance & Revenues $ 2,215,451 $ 3,965,451 $ 601,996 $ 3,363,455 15.2% Expenses Program Expenses $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 29,223 $ 2,170,777 1.3% Program Expenses - City appropriated - 875,000 - 875,000 0.0% Total Expenses 2,200,000 3,075,000 29,223 3,045,777 1.0% Budget Balance - Working Capital 15,451 890,451 - 890,451 0.0% Total Budget Balances & Expenses $ 2,215,451 $ 3,965,451 $ 29,223 $ 3,936,228 0.7%

Page 11 of 11 CITY OF DOVER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN UNRESERVED FUND PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2012 CDBG/NSP SUBSTANCE POLICE LIBRARY HOUSING ABUSE PREV. GRANTS GRANTS (2) GRANTS GRANT (1) TOTALS REVENUES: State Grants received $ 49,778 $ 280,467 $ - $ 21,925 $ 352,170 Federal Grants received 87,146 1,280 90,091 - 178,517 Recreation revenue - - - 4,967 4,967 Investment income (loss) 149 - - - 149 TOTAL REVENUES $ 137,073 $ 281,747 $ 90,091 $ 26,892 $ 535,803 EXPENDITURES: Program expenditures $ 299,555 $ 96,948 $ - $ 54,285 $ 450,788 Program expenditures - NSP - - 55,014 - 55,014 Program expenditures - CDBG - - 107,187 - 107,187 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 299,555 $ 96,948 $ 162,201 $ 54,285 $ 612,989 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures $ (162,482) $ 184,799 $ (72,110) $ (27,393) $ (77,186) Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers-out (20,448) - - - (20,448) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures & other uses $ (182,930) $ 184,799 $ (72,110) $ (27,393) $ (97,634) FUND BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF YEAR $ 415,403 $ 47,472 $ 73,368 $ 16,326 $ 552,569 FUND BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD $ 232,473 $ 232,271 $ 1,258 $ (11,067) $ 454,935 Notes: (1) Substance Abuse Prev. Grant: This grant is on a reimbursement basis. (2) Library Grants Library personnel were not able to expend all of the grant in FY 2011. A letter was written by the Department Head requesting permission to spend the grant out in FY 2012.

Dover Police Department Monthly Report To Mayor and City Council “To Protect and Serve” January 2012

February 17, 2012 Honorable Carleton E. Carey, Sr., Mayor Members of Dover City Council City Hall Dover, DE 19901 Mayor Carey and Council Members: The following is the report on Police Department activities for the month of January 2012: COMPLAINTS Total complaints received through January 31st, numbered 2,860. This is an increase of 390 complaints over the same time period for last year. 4,000 2,860 3,000 2,346 2,382 2,470 2,071 2,000 1,000 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS 12 11 12 9 Cases Reported in 8 January 8 Cases Cleared in January 4 2 2 2 Cases Cleared from 1 Previous Months 0 0 Burglary Robbery Rape

Report to Mayor and Council January 2012 Page 2 COMMUNITY POLICE SECTION ENFORCEMENT ACTION ARRESTS ABANDONED VEHICLES 0 ALCOHOL VIOLATIONS/DUI’S 1 ASSIST OTHER 0 WARRANTS ON FILE 0 BIKE ON SIDEWALK 1 CITY PARK VIOLATIONS 0 CRIMINAL ARRESTS 76 DRUG RELATED ARRESTS 0 LOUD MUSIC 0 MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS 1 PARKING VIOLATIONS 4 PEDDLER 0 MEETINGS 26 PROSTITUTION 0 COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT DCO’S 0 WANTED CHECKS/CPC’S 4 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 21 WARNINGS 11 FUGITIVE 2 TOTAL ARRESTS 147 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 3,000 The department issued 1,568 traffic citations through this reporting period. This is decrease of 108 1,953 1,948 citations over the number issued during the same 2,000 1,489 1,676 1,568 period last year. 1,000 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 TRAFFIC CRASHES Through January 31st, Dover Police investigated 152 traffic crashes. This is an increase of 14 accidents investigated during the same period last year. 500 400 300 200 145 151 134 138 152 100 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Report to Mayor and Council January 2012 Page 3 2% 911 CENTER 7% During the month of January, our 911 Center handled a total of 9,648 calls averaging 312 calls per day. VoIP 24% Dispatchers handled 2,363 calls on the 911 wireless 911 Landline lines, an average of 77 calls per day, 696 calls on the 911 Wireless 911 landlines, an average of 23 calls per day, and 167 Administrative calls on the Voice Over Internet Protocol lines an 67% average of 6 calls per day. CITY ORDINANCE SUMMONS 1,200 Through January 31st, we issued 570 city ordinance 919 summons, a decrease of 152 summons over January of last 788 722 year. *Note: of those summonses issued in January, 19 800 629 551 570 were issued for handicapped parking violations, 9 for fire 457 451 419 468 lane parking violations, 18 for false alarms (15 for 3-5 400 alarms, 2 for 6-9 alarms, 1 for 10-15 alarms, and 0 for 16 or more alarms) and 6 for noise violations (4 for vehicle 0 violations and 2 for residence violations). 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 ISSUED PAID Listed below are the major crimes and activities that occurred during the month of January:  On January 2, 2012, at approximately 1300 hours, an unknown white male, possibly Hispanic, entered a local bank located on N. DuPont Hwy., and once inside, produced a hand written note demanding money. He then indicated he had a gun and fled with an undetermined amount of money. The subject was described as being between the ages of 30-40, 5’07”—5’08”, thin build, wearing a dark blue winter coat, blue jeans, and a black knit cap. An arrest of the subject was made in this case.  On January 3, 2012, between 0800-2000 hours, an unknown person(s) entered a victim’s residence through an unsecure window and removed electronic equipment and US currency before fleeing. Currently, there are no known suspects for this incident.  On January 5, 2012, Dover Detectives responded to Bay Health Hospital Emergency Room to investigate an assault/stabbing. The investigation revealed that the two male victims, who are brothers, age 20 and 26 were at a local restaurant/bar and became involved in a physical altercation with unknown suspects in the rear parking lot at approximately 0115 hours. During the altercation, the 26 year old victim sustained an apparent broken jaw. The 20 year old victim was stabbed two times and sustained injuries to his kidney area and intestines. Both victims left the scene and were taken to a residence in Camden, DE. A 911 call was placed from the Camden residence and both victims were transported to Bay Health in Dover. Dover Officers did not receive any calls about the altercation and did not respond to the establishment at the time of the original incident. The 26 year old victim was treated at Bay Health Hospital for the broken jaw. His 20 year old brother was airlifted to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, PA to undergo surgery. He was listed in critical condition. An arrest of the subject was made in this case.  The Criminal Investigations Unit made an arrest in a burglary that occurred during the holiday break at the University of Delaware campus on Transportation Circle in Dover. The investigation revealed that the suspect used his girlfriend's key to gain access to the university. The suspect's girlfriend is an employee who was out of town during the time of the incident. Once inside, the suspect removed laptop computers and other electronic equipment. The suspect was later identified and arrested without incident.

Report to Mayor and Council January 2012 Page 4  On January 11, 2012, the Dover Police Sex Offender Unit obtained a warrant for a registered Tier 2 Sex Offender after he checked out of his motel and failed to notify S.B.I. within three days as required by law.  On January 22, 2012, Dover Officers responded to an apartment complex regarding a possible robbery and abduction of a victim who was reported to have been taken hostage by an armed gunman. The reporting person, age 26, stated that he and the alleged victim were accosted by armed suspects in the parking lot at the apartment complex and that the victim was forced into an apartment in “F” Building. He then fled and further reported that the victim’s girlfriend had gone to the apartment and was forced out by an armed gunman. He stated that the girlfriend advised that the victim was being pistol whipped by the suspects. Dover Officers activated the Crisis Negotiation Team and the Special Operations Response Team, who, in turn, initiated evacuation procedures. Crisis Negotiators were able to establish that the alleged victim was not present at the apartment complex and that he was safe. The victim denied being held hostage at any point in time, and simultaneously, the reporting person admitted to Dover Detectives that he had fabricated the story. He was arrested for Falsely Reporting an Incident.  On January 22, 2012, at approximately 0700 hours, Dover Officers responded to a robbery complaint that had occurred in the Bay Health Hospital Emergency Room waiting area. The investigation revealed that the 72 year old female victim was struck in the head and her purse was forcibly removed from her while she was seated in the waiting room. The suspect fled on foot but was apprehended by Bay Health Security Officers after a foot chase. All of the victim’s property was returned and the suspect was turned over to responding Dover Officers. The victim was treated and released from the emergency room for a minor head contusion.  On January 20, 2012, at approximately 0100 hours, it was reported that masked subjects made entry into a victim’s apartment which is located in the unit block of N. Governors Avenue. One of the subjects displayed a handgun and the victim was threatened with it. The subjects then fled from the residence once they obtained money from the victim. A joint investigation with Dover Detectives and the Delaware State Police led to the identities of the subjects involved in the home invasion. The three suspects were apprehended in Cecil County, Maryland and were extradited back to Delaware.  On Friday, January 27, 2012 at approximately 1500 hours, a Dover Officer was on patrol when he conducted a traffic stop of the subjects. After detecting the odor of fresh marijuana, and locating drug paraphernalia on one of the defendants, a vehicle search was conducted. The officer then located a large amount of pre-packaged marijuana and a loaded handgun. It was discovered that the handgun was stolen from a neighboring jurisdiction.  On January 29, 2012, at approximately 2045 hours, a delivery driver from a local pizza establishment was robbed at gunpoint by two males in the area of Forrest Creek Drive. The suspects were described as being between 16-20 years of age and wearing dark clothing. One of them produced a handgun, demanded the food and money, then both fled on foot. An arrest of both subjects has been made in this case. Respectfully Submitted, James E. Hosfelt, Jr. Chief of Police JEH:sbf

Monthly Report January 2012 Office of City Assessor

Assessor’s Report Number of Deeds Stamped for the Transfer Tax Dollar Amount for the Month Month of January 2011/2012 of January 2011/2012 33 $100 Thousands 40 29 $57 30 $50 $18 20 8 6 $7 $19 $0 6 $2 $7 $0 10 2 1 1 3 1 2011 2011 $0 0 2012 2012 First Time Buyer for Month of January January 2011/2012 Realty PropertySales 2011/2012 in Dollars Received Prior to Recording 8 $4 8 $4 Millions 6 6 Res. Non‐First $3 6 $2 $1 Time Buyers $1 2011 $0 $0 $0 4 Res. First Time $1 $0 $0 2 2012 $0 Buyers 2 0 2011 2012 Major Updates Nov ‐ 11 Dec ‐ 11 Jan ‐ 12 Assessment Change $7,200 $3,147,900 $ 333,500 Residential Sales Ratio Report Sales in Study Total Assessed Value Total Sale Pric e Ratio PRD 12 $1,526,800 $1,276,000 1.23 1.06 Ratio – Assessed Value divided by Sale Price. PRD – Mean – A PRD above 1.03 tends to indicate assessment regressivity – high valued properties are under appraised relative to low valued properties. A PRD below .98 tends to indicate assessment progressivity – high valued properties are relatively over appraised. 1

Assessor’s Report Points of Interest Scanning & Filing ‐ All new deeds are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. ‐ All appeal documents and correspondence are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. ‐All old property record cards are scanned and indexed into Fortis. Assessor’s Office Supplemental Billing ‐ Supplemental bills were mailed out totaling $5,293. 2

City of Dover Sales Ratio Report for January 2012 PARID Address Total Assessed Value Sales DT Sales Price ASR ED05‐067.14‐04‐12.00 142 RED OAK RD $163,900 31‐Jan‐12 $215,000 0.76 ED05‐068.18‐01‐49.00 136 GREENHILL AVE $141,900 20‐Jan‐12 $90,000 1.58 ED05‐075.08‐01‐26.00 215 CHELSEA WAY $223,200 6‐Jan‐12 $250,000 0.89 ED05‐076.06‐01‐87.00 9 HARLECH HALL $60,600 18‐Jan‐12 $61,000 0.99 ED05‐076.12‐02‐48.00 102 KIRKWOOD ST $43,500 31‐Jan‐12 $50,000 0.87 ED05‐076.12‐02‐62.00 115‐117 S KIRKWOOD ST $93,700 31‐Jan‐12 $77,000 1.22 ED05‐076.20‐02‐07.00 1158 CHARLES DR $176,900 13‐Jan‐12 $125,000 1.42 ED05‐077.06‐02‐21.00 759 S HALSEY RD $143,700 31‐Jan‐12 $100,000 1.44 ED05‐077.07‐01‐65.00 307 REGENT ST $162,100 30‐Jan‐12 $83,000 1.95 ED05‐085.12‐01‐64.00 350 ALDER RD $148,600 31‐Jan‐12 $122,000 1.22

CITY MANAGER’S MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY 2012 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012

Customer Services  In the month of January we processed 1,492 payments as of January 31, 2012.  City of Dover property taxes were due July 31, 2011 (July 31 in 2011 was a Sunday). As of January 31, 2012 the delinquent property taxes total 694,786.73 for all tax years. Our collection efforts include sending a delin- quent statement, making phone calls, and enforcing the Clean Hands Act. The Inspection and Planning Depart- ments have been providing assistance in collecting these outstanding debts. In November the properties over one year delinquent will be selected to process for the monition sale. Currently, there are approx 70 properties selected for processing. Human Resources  Began contract negotiations with the FOP. Parks, Recreation & Library Library  841 children attended 27 children’s programs & 53 teens attended 6 teen programs.  Job Center noted 98 participants this month. Parks & Recreation  The Co-ed Indoor Field Hockey League kicked off with 7 adult teams & 14 teams signed up for the Middle School Indoor Field Hockey League. Public Works  Working on CIP and additional funding for future street program and other projects. 2 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012

PUBLIC AFFAIRS AVERAGE TIME TO CLOSE COMPLAINTS RECEIVED - January 2012 Department Total # Complaints # Of Days Planning/Code Enforcement 22 2.3days (property code violations) Police (community policing) 0 0 days Public Services - Grounds 1 - Sanitation 1.1 days 0 - Streets 0 Public Utilities 2 .85 days Site Admin/Other Departments 5 1.2 days Social Media JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC Jan OTHER ACTIVITIES 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Facebook - New Posts 57 38 42 37 34 29 17 29 22 21 17 9 11 1,88 1,9 2,11 2,21 2,27 2,19 2,77 2,79 2,77 2,19 2,96 3,11 Facebook - Page Views 2,206 2 03 4 7 6 6 6 6 7 8 6 2 Facebook - Replies to ques- 21 16 19 11 12 16 13 26 14 11 17 9 11 tions Press Releases 4 3 5 4 6 16 11 19 11 13 11 3 5 Ceremonial Documents 15 12 17 20 19 18 17 11 24 22 19 16 19 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012 3

CUSTOMER SERVICES WORK ORDERS PROCESSED EXTENSIONS OF CREDIT 3,000 1,000 908 2,500 765 1,985 2,042 800 708 1,892 682 683 2,000 1,804 1,659 1,668 1,683 1,623 1,583 1,658 593 1,540 1,447 600 539 547 1,500 1,361 1,000 400 303 223 500 200 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 CUSTOMER PAYMENT USAGE CUTS FOR NON PAYMENT 80,000 $2,000,000 60,000 $1,600,000 36,13038,655 40,000 $1,200,000 $1,010,956 $831,683 17,424 16,345 13,351 $800,000 20,000 13,224 69 86 $400,000 $272,534 0 $122,959 Drive-Thru Over the Mail, Drop Credit Bank $- Window Counter Box Cards Drafts January 2012January 2011 FYTD12 FYTD11 2012 YTD 2011YTD FY 2012 FY 2011 Major Program Updates Jan 2012 Jan 2011 Difference Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Number of Customers Served 21,703 22,704 (1,001) 167,755 176,065 Final Bills 585 483 102 4,687 4,591 Estimated Bills 159 139 20 1,095 1,014 Penalties Posted $ 20,734 $ 31,703 $ (10,969) $ 134,035 $ 161,526 Extensions of Credit - Amount Extended $ 90,052 $ 219,241 $ (129,188) $ 1,304,052 $ 1,397,147 Balance Transfers $ 438 $ 3,273 $ (2,835) $ 11,743 $ 18,637 Utility Collections $ 27,124 $ 30,320 $ (3,196) $ 207,318 $ 184,509 Special Assessments $ - $ 515 $ (515) $ 110 $ 7,334 Miscellaneous Billings $ 158,332 $ 62,837 $ 95,495 $ 1,028,263 $ 867,656 CNP through Disconnect Collars $ 32 2 30 93 55 Court Cases - - - - - Tamperings 7 2 5 33 29 Taxes Levied (includes carry forward) $ 833,863 $ 716,680 $ 117,184 $ 8,241,542 $ 5,319,804 Billing Adjustments $ - $ 8,209 $ (8,209) $ 20,170 $ (222,224) Total Taxes Collected $ 139,077 $ 45,764 $ 93,313 $ 10,358,845 $ 9,648,180 Taxes Outstanding $ 694,787 $ 662,707 $ 32,080 $ 8,824,270 $ 5,982,511 Payments in Lieu $ - $ 1,500 $ (1,500) $ - $ 10,500 Billing Accuracy (on schedule billings) 99.0% 99.0% - 99.0% 99.0% Bills Published on Schedule 99.0% 99.9% - 99.9% 99.9% Meters Read on Schedule 99.9% 99.9% - 99.9% 99.9% Customer Satisfaction Rating 99.9% 99.7% - 99.7% 99.7% Delinquent Accounts Collected 99.7% 99.8% - 99.8% 99.8% 4 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012

HUMAN RESOURCES Customer Service Contacts 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Citizens Assisted 147 46 52 305 38 47 63 57 35 51 41 37 59 Employees Assisted 62 55 58 65 210 37 51 46 41 43 38 49 56 Applications Processed 235 24 39 273 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Category Total 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 * Caucasian 313 314 315 316 316 313 310 306 302 299 299 299 295 N/A * Minorities 61 61 61 63 63 63 63 63 63 62 61 59 59 N/A Hired 2 1 1 5 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - 12 Terminated/Resigned/ - - - 2 1 2 3 4 5 4 2 2 4 29 Retired Transferred/Promoted - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - 2 Jobs Posted 3 - 1 3 - - - 1 - - - - - 8 Workers Comp. Injuries 7 2 2 5 5 5 4 7 4 2 9 4 3 59 Workers Comp. Hours 360 445 336 438 50 46 63 135 263 565 369 418 315 3,803 Insurance Claims 3 3 6 8 2 5 3 10 1 2 1 2 1 47 Full-time Employees: 342 Part-time Employees: 12 (4 Pitts Center, 1 Recreation, 7 Library) -Numbers do not reflect, temporary, seasonal, relief fire dispatchers, committee or council members. Resigned: Public Utilities Director Retired: Administrative Assistant (Police), Craftsperson II (Central Services), Depart. Budget & Support Supervisor (Public Utilities) Recruitment Information American Asian/Paci In Out Position Total Female Male Black White Hispanic Indian/Alaskan Unknown fic Islander Dover Dover Native No Positions Posted Unfilled/Open Positions by Department* Unfilled/Open Positions Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan By Department 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12** Electric 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 5 Public Works 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 3 3 5 5 9 Police 2 2 2 - - - 4 4 4 5 3 3 3 All Other Departments 4 3 3 4.5 4.5 7.5 5 6.5 8.5 12 10.5 12.5 11.5 Totals 11 10 9 8.5 8.5 12.5 12 14.5 19.5 22.5 23.5 25.5 28.5 *Not used for Budgeting Purposes **Organization Change Human Resources Clerk on terminal leave (included in totals). Electric: Substation Technician, Journeyman – 1 st Class Lineman, Substation Relay Foreman, Public Utilities Director, Dept. Budget & Support Supervisor Public Works: Motor Equipment Operator II/Water, Heavy Equipment Operator II, Field Supervisor I - Streets, and (2) MEO I & (1) MEO II – Sanitation, Public Services Manager, Custodian I (1), Facilities Management - Craftsperson II Police: (3) Police Officers All Other Departments: Sr. LAN Analyst (due to A. Siegel currently acting as IT Director), LAN Analyst, Human Resources Clerk, Human Resources and Safety Coordinator, Senior City Administrator, Library Clerk (PT), (2)Library Page (PT), Administrative Assistant - Clerk’s Office, Planner II, Fire Dispatcher, Central Services Director, Central Mailroom Clerk City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012 5

HUMAN RESOURCES continued Bonus Programs by Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Bonus Program Category Total 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Stop Program-Sensibly Taking Off Pounds(weigh- - 27 17 6 21 - 15 4 5 22 5 8 - 130 ins) Caught Doing it Right- Promotes employees - - - - - - - 1 1 1 - - 3 productivity & creativity - (submissions) Breathe Program-Rewards for ending tobacco use - - - - - - 1 1 - 1 - 1 4 - (submissions) Ducs in a Row-Doing Useful Community Service - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (submissions) Workers Comp Injuries 20 15 10 5 0 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- * 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Elect ric Public Works Police Ot hers * Organization Change Electric: 0 Public Works: 1 Police: 2 All Other Depts.: 0 * * Organization Change Electric: 168 Public Works: 148 Police: 0 All Other Depts.: 0 6 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Service Requests Resolved Citizen Action Center - Customers w/ New Issues 250 233 216 221 150 200 179 186 180 130 162 165 168 63 154 151 159 144 110 129 70 32 114 150 125 90 38 78 44 33 88 31 100 70 81 50 50 30 10 0 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Programming Requests Completed Page Views - City of Dover Web Page 30 50,000 24 45,000 25 40,000 35,000 Pages Viewed 20 17 15 16 15 16 15 15 16 30,000 14 14 15 43,152 12 25,000 38,777 39,261 11 36,358 20,000 28,600 10 23,639 15,000 22,347 20,460 19,853 16,470 18,965 17,995 17,120 5 10,000 5,000 0 0 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Current Performance Indicators Last Month Same Month Month Last Year iSeries Availability 100% 100% 100% Server Availability 100% 100% 100% AS/400 Connections N/A N/A N/A (concurrent/authorized users) PCs Supported 343 341 336 Scheduled PCs Replaced - - - Servers Supported 16 16 16 People Trained 4 9 2 Availability Statistics based on 7:00 AM until 5:00 PM Monday—Friday City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012 7

PARKS, RECREATION & LIBRARY Library Adult Services Childrens Services 1000 1000 500 500 0 0 Jan 11 Feb 11 Mar 11 Apr 11 May 11 June 11 July 11 Aug 11 Sept 11 Oct 11 Nov 11 Dec 11 Jan 12 Jan 11 Feb 11 Mar 11 Apr 11 May 11 June 11 July 11 Aug 11 Sept 11 Oct 11 Nov 11 Dec 11 Jan 12 Reference – 184 Reader’s Advisory – 33 Reference - 99; Reader’s Advisory – 63 Electronic Assistance – 156; Electronic Assistance – 29; Outreach – 0 ****We have amended our Electronic Assistance, Reader's Advisory & Reference transactions to more accurately represent the actual statistics.*** Circulation January 12 FYTD 12 January 11 FYTD 11 Dover residents 16,070 114,729 16,708 119,372 Kent residents* 14,024 100,468 15,775 160,269 Non-county residents 2,102 12,162 1,905 10,232 Registrations Dover residents 197 1,365 220 1,635 Kent residents* 80 554 79 697 Non-county residents 8 69 7 74 Other Visiting Patrons 29,582 217,372 29,291 215,938 Meeting Room Usage** 80 440 180 1,620 Photocopier Usage 1,332 9,181 1,476 10,872 Dial-A-Story 607 6,658 1,014 8,348 Computer Usage 3,951 28,978 4,220 31,423 Holds (Total) 7,019 49,377 6,549 47,317 *Breakout of Kent County Residential Statistics Circulation Registrations Harrington: 130 Harrington: 1 Smyrna: 695 Smyrna: 3 Milford: 105 Milford: 1 Outside City Limits: 13,094 Outside City Limits: 83 Total Registered Users: (Card Holders) City: 18,083 Kent County: 13,522 Outside Kent County: 1,120 Other Points of Interest: Inter/Interlibrary***: 0 items loaned out Technical services: 4,481 items added 24 items borrowed 2,514 items deleted Volunteers: 369.5 hours of service completed ** Meeting Room Usage The meeting room is no longer available for rental as it has become the designated location of the Job Center. *** Inter/Intralibrary We are re-evaluating the way our Interlibrary & Holds statistics are being reported. You'll notice that the totals for these stats are now being combined and the Interlibrary numbers are much lower than in the past 8 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012

Parks and Recreation 0 Recreation Revenue Recreation Revenue Breakdown 6 1 25,000 1 , 6 6 $30,000.00 0 7 , 2 2 7 8 7 , 6 1 7 20,000 8 , 1 $25,000.00 5 1 0 6 .5 $20,000.00 15,000 8 2 0 6 2 2 7 0 ,8 0 , 7 ,6 ,6 9 0 9 9 3 , 9 9 6 8 $15,000.00 9 8 2 , , 10,000 6 7 7 0 2 8 4 $10,000.00 , 3 ,2 5,000 3 $5,000.00 0 $0.00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oc t Nov Dec Jan Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oc t Nov Dec Jan 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Year To Date Revenue Comparison FY11 $58,164 vs FY12: $61,021 General – $1,138 Rental Payments – $2.468 Sports – $1.195 Leagues – $3,815 Trips – $531 Rentals JANUARY 12 FYTD 12 JANUARY 11 FYTD 11 Baseball/Softball Field Rentals* 0 98 0 111 Dover Park Pavilions (2) 0 48 0 18 Multipurpose/Field Hockey Field Rentals* 0 22 0 54 Recreation Center – Dover Park 6 86 5 114 Silver Lake Pavilions (2) / Schutte (1) 0 19 0 34 Soccer Field Rentals* 0 6 0 9 Stage – Mobile Platform 0 15 0 19 *These numbers reflect groups that utilized our facilities during July. Dover Park Program Attendance* JANUAR 12 FYTD 12 JANUARY 11 FYTD 11 No program activities took place in Dover Park during January 2012. *This number reflects activities that took place in December. (Not included on the JWP report.) FREE Open Gym Registration Cards* - through 12/31/2011 Total Cards Issued: 4,741 City Residents: 2,106 - (44%) Non-City Residents: 2,635- (56%) - Kent County: 2,168 - (46%) - Sussex County: 149 - (3%) - New Castle County: 106 - (2%) - Out of State: 212 - (4%) *The cards permit entrance to the facility during scheduled Public Open Gym Periods at no charge. City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012 9

PUBLIC WORKS Administration Administrative review and inspection services continued on all residential and commercial developments. The following residential subdivisions are in various phases of construction: Oak Shadows Emerald Pointe Lexington Glenn Village of Westover (Phase VI) Farthing Woods Eden Hill (Residential) Patriot Village Clearview Meadows Village of Cannon Mill Sanitation Monthly Total Refuse (Tons) Sanitation Hours 1,500 1200 998 1000 898 1,000 924 887 829 845 812 804 762 779 795 713 706 800 636 560 558 473 600 441 412 500 390 363 240 400 254 188 167 169 202 129 157 144 162 75 200 49 39 0 0 - 0 J an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Bulk Automated Jan 12 Jan 11 JANUARY 12 FYTD 12 JANUARY 11 FYTD 11 Trips to DSWA Sandtown Landfill 181 1267 193 1,639 Total Tonnage to DSWA 924.73 7,229.20 966.76 8,486.19 90-Gallon Containers Delivered 18 136 12 139 300-Gallon Containers Delivered 5 23 3 30 Total Man Hours-containers Delivered 49 310 39 375 CURBSIDE RECYCLING TOTAL # OF TOTAL # OF AC- WEIGHT/LBS. AVE. LBS. STATS HOUSEHOLDS COUNTS January 2012 19,173 8,532 287,260 14.98 10 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012

Streets JANUARY 12 FYTD 12 JANUARY 11 FYTD 11 Signed Installed 60 141 15 136 Signs Repaired 24 123 38 137 Curbs Painted Yellow (feet) 0 942 15 848 New Post Installed 7 46 0 50 Storm Catch Basins Repaired 1 31 0 30 Storm Catch Basin Repairing (Hrs.) 42 142 0 196 Storm Catch Basins Cleaned 1,631 1,937 50 73 Storm Catch Basins Cleaning (Hrs.) 448 681 100 110 Hot Mix Patching (Tons) 0 63 0 93 Hot Mix Patching (Hrs.) 0 420 0 351 Cold Mix Patching Hrs.) 32 261 72 224 Concrete Work (Hrs) 0 544 0 221 Concrete Patching (Cubic Yards) 0 1 0 37 Street and Alley Maintenance (Hrs) 168 1,184 155 1,089 Ditch Work (Hrs). 0 64 0 65 Street Sweeping (Miles) 1,234 5,555 303 5,629 Street Sweeping (Cubic Yards) 342 1,352 120 1,359 Leaves Collected (Cubic Yards) 475 14,674 325 8,525 Leaf Collection (Miles) 976 5,182 420 5,745 Grounds Arborist Crew JANUARY 2012 JANUARY 2011 Trees Trimmed 41 30 Trees Removed 24* 15 Trees Planted 12 0 Stumps Removed 17** 0 *Most of these were small trees along the stream and ditches between Bicentennial Village and Four Seasons to Saulsbury Road to keep water flowing. **The majority of stumps were from street trees between the curb and the sidewalk. Removal of a large, hazardous cherry tree along the property line between 306 Kings Highway and the Silver Lake Park. The Grounds Divi- sion removed the tree, ground out the stump, repaired the landscape including hauling in topsoil and seeding the area. Beautification Crew  Installed fiberglass marker stakes around the flower beds on The Plaza, Route 8, and Fox Hall to alert snow removal personnel of the location of the beds.  Removed the candles and wreaths from City Hall, the Library and Weyandt Hall.  Cleaned up the greenhouse including weeding, washing all benches with bleach to prepare for sowing seed and potting up plugs next month. Mowing Crew  Collected and chipped 921 Christmas trees to be used to mulch trees and shrubs in upcoming landscape projects.  Assisted in taking down the Peace sign on The Green and bringing in the three floating Christmas trees on Silver Lake and Mirror Lake. City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012 11

Geographic Information Systems (GIS)  Prepared Fire Marshall’s monthly report.  Prepared hand trash pickup area map for sanitation.  Prepared alley abandonment maps for City Clerk’s office.  Created and printed several maps and posters for Downtown Dover Development Office. Fleet and Facilities Management Fleet Maintenance Work Orders: 54 Major Program Updates Measure January 12 January 11 DIFFERENCE Fleet Maintenance Scheduled Preventative Maintenance 6 out of 32 6 out of 20 appointments being kept (Quantity and - 11.25% 18.75% 30.0% Percentage) Facilities Management Routine work orders completed within 5 30 out of 32 36 out of 39 + 1.44% days (Quantity and Percentage) 93.75% 92.31% Emergency work orders completed with- 11 out of 11 4 out of 4 0% in 2 days (Quantity and Percentage) 100% 100% SOP/CIP Updates (percentages below represent percent completed) FY-2011 Spring Street Program – 28.5% 12 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012

PUBLIC UTILITIES Electric System Peak Total System Load 172.6 200 81,797 100,000 165.5 153.8 153.8 71,888 74,068 64,474 65,231 139.3 61,675 60,425 80,000 54,947 57,409 54,078 56,161 57,142 53,525 150 108.2 104.8 106.9 106.13 60,000 98.6 101.8 98.5 97.3 100 40,000 20,000 Jan 11 Feb 11 Mar 11 Apr 11 May 11 Jun 11 Jul 11 Aug 11 Sep 11 Oct 11 Nov 11 Dec 11 Jan 12 50 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Outages Customers of Gained/Lost 35 8,000 40 34 25 6,000 30 Customers 23 23 Outages 15 4,000 17 18 16 20 8 8 9 10 5 2,000 10 4 5 6 0 -5 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan 0 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Jan 11 Feb 11 Mar 11 Apr 11 May 11 Jun 11 Jul 11 Aug 11 Sep 11 Oct 11 Nov 11 Dec 11 Jan 12 Outages Outages: 3 Customers: 842 Electric Monthly Outage Report The annual outage goal will be less than 295 minutes per customer, which is a Delaware Standard. This will be measured by calculating the System Average Interruption Duration Index. FY 12 YTD FY 11 FY 10 55.35 63.78 160.14 Controllable Outages Average Response Time Annual goal is less than 40 Goal is less than 30 minutes Month Year-to-date Month Year-to-date 2 39 19.33 Minutes 32.22 Minutes City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012 13

Electric Engineering Design Major Program Updates JAN 12 JAN 11 DIFF FY12 YTD FY11 Extensions Design Completed Within 30 days 0 0 - 4 0 of complete Submission New Underground Installation % Completed New Underground Installation % Completed N/A JAN 12 JAN 11 FY12 YTD PROGRAM UPDATES Tree Trimming 131 246 958 Number of Oil Releases 1 3 1 Lost Time Accidents – All Electric Utility Divisions 0 0 8 New Services 10 8 90 Major Goals Completed in the Past Two Months N/A 14 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012

Water/Wastewater Water Production/Billed Consumption/Flow to Kent County 255,000,000 205,000,000 155,000,000 105,000,000 55,000,000 5,000,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 Total Water Prod . Billed Consump t. ENGINEERING SUMMARY Major Program Updates JANUARY 12 JANUARY 11 DIFF FY12 YTD FY11 State and Federal Violations 0 violations 0 violations - - - Water Quality Complaints 1 1 -1 65 78 Plan Review Completed Within 30 days of Sub- 6 plans 3 3 100% 95% mission 100% 100% plans Field Inspection Response within 48 hours of 3.33 96.67% 100% 99.14% 97.07% Request % Major Goals Completed in the Past Two Months None OPERATIONAL SUMMARY JANUARY 12 JANUARY 11 Current FY Task Water Production – Daily Average 3,731,806 3,950,871 968,549,000 Average Field Response Time (goal is < 30 minutes) 18 20.25 22.4 Water Mains Repaired 3 0 18 Water Service Lines Repaired 0 0 11 Wastewater Mains Repaired 0 1 2 Wastewater Service Lines Repaired 1 0 8 Sewer Lines Flushed – Linear Feet 79,512 26,181 358,785 Percentage of Flow Sent to Kent County vs. Gallons Billed 133% 100% 106% (inflow/Infiltration monitoring) Total Water Meters in City Distribution System 14,009 13,893 69 Lost Time Accidents – All Water/Wastewater Divisions 0 0 1 City Manager’s Monthly Report, January 2012 15

CITY PLANNER’S MONTHLY REPORT Public Services Group P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 Phone: (302) 736-7196 Fax (302) 736-4217 January 2012 PERSONEL On January 18, 2012 Dawn Melson-Williams (Principal Planner) and Janelle Cornwell (Planner II) attended an APA webcast audio conference “Resilient Planning Agencies” at the co-sponsored by the Delaware Chapter of the American Planning Associations (APA) and the Kent County Department of Planning Services. EDEN HILL FARM TND • In January 2012, construction continues on a set of six townhouse dwelling units located in the 400 block of Ridgely Boulevard within Phase 1 of the Residential District. The Building Permits for another series of six townhouse units (401-411 Ridgely Boulevard) were issued January 10, 2012. For the Residential District of Eden Hill Farm Traditional Neighborhood Design, the totals are now 59 dwelling units complete of the 71 permits approved for dwelling units. • There are approximately six residential lots left in Phase 1 of the project. With the project anticipated to seek commencement of development in Phase 2, City Staff will be working with the site developer in regards to addressing delays in street lighting installation, tree planting requirements, and other infrastructure items. • In January, there was no specific activity associated with the Professional Office, Medical & Financial District. • There was no activity associated with the Neighborhood Commercial District. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Planning Staff continues to focus efforts on the implementation items identified in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as amended. • Planning Staff continues to work on the development of several ordinances and a future update to the AEOZ (Airport Environs Overlay Zone). • On January 9, 2012 the City Council approved a text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow for limited commercial uses accessory to residential uses on properties in the General Residence Zones (RG-1 and RG-2) that are within the Historic District Zone or listed in the National Register of Historic Places through a Conditional Use process (MI-11-17, Ordinance #2011-29). • As part of the annual opportunity for consideration of applications to amend the Comprehensive Plan, the City Council conducted the First Reading of Ordinance #2012-02 for amendments to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan for Map 12-1: Land Development Plan Map and Map 13-1 Annexation Areas and Map 13-2 Potential Land Use for Annexation Areas. The Public Hearings on these requests were scheduled for February 21st at the Planning Commission and March 12th at City Council. These two requests were also considered at the PLUS Review (Preliminary Land Use Services) meeting of January 25, 2012. Other Activities New Dover High School Project (C-10-05/S-11-18) – Construction activities related to utilities, stormwater management facilities, site prep, and building foundation construction activities continue at the site. The Planning Office issued comments on the Site Plan set associated with the overall site development plan (Bid

Pack C) on January 23, 2012. The monthly progress meeting on the Dover High School project was held on January 19th with Planning Staff and Public Utilities Staff meeting with the district’s design professionals and DelDOT staff. Review of the plans for transportation elements (the west entrance, east entrance, Dover High Drive) associated with the school project continues. It is anticipated that the Building Permit (Structure) application for the high school building will be filed for review in the upcoming weeks. CODE ENFORCEMENT Case Type # cases current # cases % staff initiated % staff initiated month YTD current month YTD No valid rental permit 6 6 100% 100% No valid building permit 1 1 100% 100% Tall grass and weeds 1 1 100% 100% Unregistered vehicle 8 8 50% 50% Abandoned vehicle 15 15 67% 67% Annual Housing Inspection 105 105 99% 99% Property Maintenance – 35 35 83% 83% Exterior Electric Termination 18 18 89% 89% Dover Code of Ordinances 18 18 94% 94% Zoning 7 7 43% 43% Total Cases 214 214 Total # of Inspections 321 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT U CDBG FY11 PROJECTS Homeownership Assistance Program Four families have purchased homes using the Dover First Start Program and two families are scheduled to close at the end of the month. Homeowner Rehabilitation Program One home has been completed and two are scheduled to be completed early February. Dover Interfaith Mission to the Homeless CDBG funds have been utilized to cover the operation cost for the shelter. Emergency Home Repair Project Emergency repairs have been completed on four properties. Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) The City was awarded $1,426,740 for the acquisition and rehab of foreclosed properties to be sold to qualifying families. A total of $1,249,467 has been expended on the acquisition and renovations for 8 properties. One property has been purchased with program income and is for sale. The remaining balance of $177,272 will be utilized for renovations and acquisition. Three properties have been sold, four are for sale, one is a lease purchase and one is a rental that serves persons with disabilities. The City has partnered with Central Delaware Habitat for Humanity as an NSP partner. 218 Ann Avenue (sold) 337 N. Governors Avenue (for sale) 343 Mimosa Avenue (sold) 254 Green Blade Drive (sold)

907 Woodcrest Avenue (lease purchase) 302 Stonebrook Place (for sale) 1430 S. Hancock (group home rental) 11 Westover Drive (under contract) 1415 S. Hancock (for sale) BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS REPORTS Board of Adjustment: The Board of Adjustment met on January 18, 2012 and took the following actions. The next regular scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment is scheduled for February 15, 2012. 1. Applicant #V-12-01 - 1159 South DuPont Highway: Mark Lloyd – Moved to approve variance pertaining to a pylon sign. Historic District Commission: The Historic District Commission met on January 16, 2012 and took the following actions. The next Historic District Commission meeting is scheduled for February 16, 2012. 1. HI-11-01 Building at 326 West Loockerman Street: Building Demolition – Moved to approve a one year extension of the Architectural Review Certification for demolition of existing building. 2. HI-10-04 Wesley United Methodist Church: Elevation and Canopy Addition: Architectural Review Certification – Moved to recommend approval the requested additional height of the fence to allow a fence height of five feet. 3. HI-12-01 Building Permit #12-0018 for Frankfurt Bakery at 323 South Governors Avenue – Moved to approve the Architectural Review Certification for Building Permit with conditions to revise elements of the exterior finish materials and door and window replacements. Planning Commission The Planning Commission met on January 17, 2012 and took the actions summarized listed below. The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for February 21, 2012 (Tuesday due to holiday). 1. S-11-16 Governors Avenue Animal Hospital at 1008 South Governors Avenue – Informational item to clarify building floor area in approved Site Plan. No action required. 2. SB-12-01 Lands of Donnelly at 99 Pine Valley Road – Approved Minor Subdivision Plan to create two lots from the existing parcel with conditions that the property line be adjusted to accommodate the driveway and approval of the waiver as requested for the elimination of sidewalk. The Revised Plan provided the meeting was accepted. LIFE SAFETY Inspections JANUARY 12 FYTD 12 JANUARY 11 FYTD 11 Fire Protection Inspections (new & existing) 15 351 30 379 Fire Code Inspections 20 296 16 695 Inspection Deficiencies 5 368 11 710 Certificate of Occupancy 5 19 1 39 Office 77 674 94 729 Meetings 15.5 215.5 46 306 Plan Review 56 282 39 294 Training 160 390 177 379 Fire Investigations 3 57 46 132 Accidental $80,000.00 $205,010.00 $20,000.00 $88,950.00 Incendiary $0.00 $59,500.00 $0.00 $192,550.00 Undetermined $0.00 $20,000.00 $300.00 $22,600.00

PERMITTING AND LICENSING Permits Issued JANUARY 12 FYTD 12 JANUARY 11 FYTD 11 Administrative Permit 1 13 0 12 Building Addition/Renovation Permits 34 221 34 323 Building Permits 7 101 5 72 Demolition Permits 3 12 1 13 Fence Permits 11 64 2 41 Fire Prevention Permits 9 46 6 40 Mechanical Permits 14 164 23 154 Plumbing Permits 36 252 34 284 Sign Permits 27 161 14 119 Swimming Pool Permits 0 6 0 2 Business Licenses 36 1,340 28 1,487 Fire Protection 69 412 Merchant Licenses 3 265 1 272 Contractor Licenses 31 705 20 770 Lodging House Licenses 3 8 0 0 Mobile Homes 24 297 1 229 Public Occupancy 34 78 2 34 Rental Dwelling 389 487 1 64 BUILDING INSPECTIONS JANUARY 12 FYTD 12 JANUARY 11 FYTD 11 Building 260 2,089 311 2,680 Plumbing/Mechanical 325 2,455 266 2,618 Certificate of Occupancy 4 67 11 131 DANGEROUS BUILDINGS/DEMOLITION STATUS The following buildings were demolished during January, after prior dangerous building declaration by City Council: • 423 Collins Drive • 29 North Kirkwood Street Asbestos abatement was begun on the following building, after prior dangerous building declaration by City Council: • 41 South Queen Street The following buildings were declared dangerous by City Council on January 27, 2012: • 123 Blue Beach Drive • 22 Fair Wind Place DOWNTOWN DOVER PARTNERSHIP • January’s First Friday featured the “Meet the Artist’s” Reception and Auction at the Dover Art League for the DDP’s first community Art Project. More than 40 Stars were auctioned off to attendees and the evening was enjoyed by artists, their friends and family members, and the public. Proceeds from the sale of the STARS were split between the Artists and the DDP Design Committee. • Bill Neaton and Gregg Moore provided an overview of the downtown projects for Senator Chris Coons and Bill took the Senator on a tour to meet several of the small business owners. He also provided an update on downtown projects to the Kent County Tourism Board, and the Harrington ERA Leads Group.

• Bill attended the Greater Dover Committee Legislative Lunch, the Delaware State Chamber’s Annual Dinner and the CDCC Military Affaire. • Bill Neaton and Gary Cecchett coordinated a meeting with ING Direct and Wohlsen Construction on New Market Tax Credit Financing as a possible source of financing for future downtown development projects. • The DDP co-sponsored a workshop with the YWCA on Excel. The staff completed the annual Main Street certification self-assessment for DEDO. DDP staff provided an overview of the outcomes of the Dover Branding Project and our plans for implementation including the new street banners in the Loockerman Corridor, redesign of the Bradford Street Kiosk and the DDP website, and a downtown Dover shopping guide and information brochure. • Demolition began on the renovation project at 22-24 West Loockerman Street. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE • Bill Neaton continued to meet with Calpine and facilitate their application process for state funding. • Bill had several meetings with Alan Levin and other DEDO staff to discuss progress on downtown projects. • Bill met with Harry Williams, DSU president, to provide an update on City of Dover Economic Development projects and identify ways to work with the university. • Bill attended meetings with Mezzetta, a food processing company interested in possible expansion to the Dover area. • Bill provided the semi-annual update to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee of employment statistics for Dover’s major employers. Measures: 1. Maintain an unemployment rate for the City of Dover that is lower than national and state averages. 2009-2010 Actual 2010-2011 Actual 2011-2012 Projected Results <10% rate in July 2010 <10% unemployment rate in July <10% unemployment rate in July 9.5% - U.S. Rate 2011 2012 8.5% - DE Rate 9.2 % - U.S. Rate 8.5 % - U.S. Rate 9.9% - City of Dover Rate 8.0 % - DE Rate 7.4 % - DE Rate July 2010 – Actual 9.9% - City of Dover Rate 8.1% - City of Dover Rate June 2011 – Actual DECEMBER 2011 – Actual 2. Monitor number of contacts with small businesses and with out-of-town companies interested in locating in Dover. 2009-2010 Actual 2010-2011 Actual 2011-2012 Projected Results ≥20 contacts with potential ≥20 contacts with potential small >20 contacts with potential small small businesses; businesses; businesses; 11 contacts YTD 12 contacts YTD 10 Contacts YTD ≥15 contacts with out-of-town ≥15 contacts with out-of-town 11 contacts with out-of-town companies interested in locating companies interested in locating companies interested in locating in Dover. in Dover. in Dover 8 contacts YTD 10 contacts YTD 8 Contacts YTD Submitted by: Ann Marie Townshend, AICP Planning & Community Development Director

Date Range: From 01/01/2012 to 01/31/2012 Incident Type Report (Summary) Dover Fire Department Count Pct of Total Est Total Est Incident Type Incidents Loss Loss 1 Fire 111 Building fire 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 113 Cooking fire, confined to container 11 15.28% $0 0.00% 114 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 116 Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire confined 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 131 Passenger vehicle fire 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 141 Forest, woods or wildland fire 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 151 Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 1 1.39% $0 0.00% Totals 17 23.61% $0 0.00% 2 Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat(no fire) 221 Overpressure rupture of air or gas pipe/pipeline 1 1.39% $0 0.00% Totals 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 3 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident 322 Motor vehicle accident with injuries 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 350 Extrication, rescue, other 2 2.78% $0 0.00% 352 Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 1 1.39% $0 0.00% Totals 4 5.56% $0 0.00% 4 Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 400 Hazardous condition, other 2 2.78% $0 0.00% 410 Combustible/flammable gas/liquid condition, other 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 412 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 424 Carbon monoxide incident 3 4.17% $0 0.00% 440 Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 445 Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 1 1.39% $0 0.00% Totals 9 12.50% $0 0.00% 5 Service Call 510 Person in distress, other 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 511 Lock-out 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 531 Smoke or odor removal 3 4.17% $0 0.00% 550 Public service assistance, other 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 571 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 1 1.39% $0 0.00% Totals 7 9.72% $0 0.00% 6 Good Intent Call 600 Good intent call, other 6 8.33% $0 0.00% 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 2 2.78% $0 0.00% 652 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 1 1.39% $0 0.00% Totals 9 12.50% $0 0.00% 7 False Alarm & False Call 700 False alarm or false call, other 7 9.72% $0 0.00% 715 Local alarm system, malicious false alarm 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 730 System malfunction, other 3 4.17% $0 0.00% 733 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 6 8.33% $0 0.00% 735 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 736 CO detector activation due to malfunction 2 2.78% $0 0.00% 740 Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 1 1.39% $0 0.00% 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 3 4.17% $0 0.00% 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 1 1.39% $0 0.00% Date: 02/27/2012 Page: 1

Date Range: From 01/01/2012 to 01/31/2012 Incident Type Report (Summary) Dover Fire Department Count Pct of Total Est Total Est Incident Type Incidents Loss Loss Totals 25 34.72% $0 0.00% 8 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster Totals 0 0.00% $0 0.00% 9 Special Incident Type Totals 0 0.00% $0 0.00% Totals 72 $0 Date: 02/27/2012 Page: 2

Date Range: From 01/ 01/ 2012 to 01/ 31/ 2012 Manpower Hours by Sitation Found Dover Fire Department Num ber of Hours by Situation Found Sum of # Attending X Incident Length 114 Fire 17 Overpressure Rupture, Exp Overpressure Rupture, Exp Fire 12 Rescue & Emergency Medica 53 Hazardous Condition (No F Rescue & Emergency Medica 35 Service Call 32 Good Intent Call 101 False Alarm & False Call 0 Severe Weather & Natural 0 Special Incident Type Hazardous Condition (No F Severe Weather & Natural Special Incident Type Service Call False Alarm & False Call Good Intent Call Date: 02/27/2012 Page: 1

Date Range: From 01/ 01/ 2012 to 01/ 31/ 2012 Alarms by Month of Year Dover Fire Department 72 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Date: 02/27/2012 Page: 1

Date Range: From 01/01/2012 to 01/31/2012 Incident Run Log Company: All Companies Dover Fire Department Sorted by: Incident Number Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type 01/01/2012 30046 2012-000001 00:27 9 PAR HAVEN DR C False alarm or false call, other DFD responded to the above address in reference to am issue with the boiler. On arrival, crews determined a small motor on the boiler was in need of repair. Maintenance was on scene and stated it is due to be repaired on Tuesday. No further action taken. 01/01/2012 30046 2012-000002 06:08 1358 FORREST AVE Smoke or odor removal DFD responded to the above location in reference to smoke inside the business. On arrival, crews determined the cause was a heater malfunction. The manager of the store was advised to contact a service tech as soon as possible. No further action taken. 01/01/2012 30046 2012-000003 09:07 756 MILLER DR CO detector activation due to malfunction MALFUNCTIONING CO DETECTOR. 01/01/2012 30046 2012-000004 19:42 1408 HOPKINS AVE Cooking fire, confined to container DFD responded to the above address in reference to a possible oven fire. On arrival, crews determined there was a small cooking fire contained to the oven and same was extinguished prior to fire personnel arrival. Positive pressure was placed at the front door to remove a light haze of smoke. No further action taken. 01/01/2012 30046 2012-000005 23:41 65 CARVER RD False alarm or false call, other DFD responded to the above address in reference to an alarm activation. On arrival, crews conducted a walk through of the building and met with negative results. No further action taken. 01/02/2012 30046 2012-000006 14:05 2 N STATE ST False alarm or false call, other DFD responded to the above location in reference to an alarm activatioin. Crews conducted a walk through of the building and met with negative results. No further action taken. 01/03/2012 30046 2012-000007 05:23 430 COLLEGE RD 500 False alarm or false call, other Crews from L-1 and E6 found a malfunctioning sprinkler system. The sprinkler system pump was leaking was from several spots. The scene was turned over to the property manager and the building was placed on fire watch. The FM was to be notified in the morning due to the building being listed as abandoned and should no longer be listed that way. 01/03/2012 30046 2012-000008 09:21 1 PAT LYNN DR Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke Crews checked the second floor and found no smoke condition. The school turned there heat on for the first time in 2 weeks and dust from that action caused someone on site to pull the pull station near door 1.Scene was turned over to Fm 2 01/03/2012 30046 2012-000009 16:28 111 W LOOCKERMAN ST Carbon monoxide incident E6'S CREW PROVIDED POSITIVE PRESSURE TO APT 3. E6'S CREW TOOK READINGS OF 42 PARTS PER MILLION OF C.O. THE HOMEOWNER WAS EVALUTAED BY B63 AND E6 CLEARED TURNING THE SCENE OVER TO THEM. 01/04/2012 30046 2012-000010 09:27 1200 N DUPONT HWY System malfunction, other Writer responded to above for report of an alarm. Village Cafe was investigated and it was found that the alarm was in supervisory mode. Scene was turned over to FM-1. 01/04/2012 30046 2012-000011 17:56 49 CATHY AVE Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) CREWS FOUND A 500 GALLON PROPANE TANK LEAKING NEXT TO 49 CATHY AVE. E6'S CREW SECURED THE VALVE AND COMMAND HAD DOVER CONTACT NGS COOPERATION TO COME AND REPAIR THE TANK. UNITS CLEARED AND THE HOMEOWNER WAS ADVISED TO WAIT A 29 CATHY AVE UNTIL THE GAS COMPANY ARRIVED. 01/04/2012 30046 2012-000012 18:36 217 HARRIET ST Good intent call, other B9 CHECK THE AREA FOR A FIELD FIRE WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. DOVER 21 MADE CONTACT WITH THE RP AND SHE ADVISED THE HOUSE 2 DOORS DOWN WAS SHOOTING OFF FIRE WORKS. 01/05/2012 30046 2012-000013 02:12 160 WILLIS RD Carbon monoxide incident On arrival found high CO readings in Apts A ,B , C, D. Crews secured all gas applances and the natural gas to the apartments. All residences were ventilated and had readings of 0 CO prior to clearing the scene. Scene turned over to Chesapeake and bulding maintenance. 01/05/2012 30046 2012-000014 02:21 424 FEDERAL STREET Good intent call, other Responded to the above address for a report of seeing smoke. Crew from engine 3 investigated to find steam coming from a building behind the courthouse. Scene was placed under control. 01/05/2012 30046 2012-000015 17:38 201 ORCHARD AVE Cooking fire, confined to container E6 responded for a reported oven fire at the above address. Upon arrival crews found that food had fallen in the coil area. The power to the stove was secured and homeowner was advised to have someone look at it before placing it back into service. 01/05/2012 30046 2012-000016 21:00 202 BAY TREE RD A System malfunction, other On the above date and time units were alerted for report of an automatic fire alarm E6 arrived on scene and writer assumed command. Crews investigated and found the panel to say general fire alarm. Crews conducted a walk thru of buildings A. B, and C. Crews found no smoke or fire as well as no detectors lit or pull stations activated. Scene was placed under control and turned over to maintenance. 01/06/2012 30046 2012-000017 14:41 131 W LOOCKERMAN ST Extrication, rescue, other On arrival found a puppy's head stuck in a rod iron fence. Crew cut the fence and freed the puppy from same. No further action. 01/07/2012 30046 2012-000018 07:49 1200 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation due to malfunction On arrival found a smoke detector activation in the elevator shaft. DSU PD had checked the area with negetive results. Fire alarm system had several trouble alarms on the panel and the system would not reset. Building placed on fire watch and PD advised to contact the Fire Dept when the system was back in service. Dover 17 cleared. 01/07/2012 30046 2012-000019 18:10 267 MAIN ST Person in distress, other assist elderly female with getting off the floor. Date: 02/27/2012 Page: 1 Time:08:25

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type 01/07/2012 30046 2012-000020 22:48 992 WHATCOAT DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction Activation due to malfunction. Residents stated alarm had been going off for an hour. Dispatch advised they had a respondent en route but with a 45 to 1 hour ETA. Writer removed lock with and hinge with minimal damage, from door to silenced alarm. 01/08/2012 30046 2012-000021 20:31 38 S NEW ST Building fire Dover Fire Department responded to 38 S New Street in reference to a working house fire with a possible subject trapped. On arrival, Engine 4 (15) reported a two story residence with smoke showing from the second floor. At this point, wirter assumed command of the scene. Crew from Engine 4 immediately advanced a 1 3/4 " preconnect line through the front door and proceeded to the second floor. Ladder 2 arrived directly behind Engine 4 and Ladder 2's crew began search and rescue. At 2036 hours, Engine 4A (West) advised writer he and his partner (O'Connor III) located a victim in the fire room and the victim was confirmed DOA. The victim was unable to be removed. Engine 4 quickly extinguished the visible fire and Ladder 1's crew arrived and assisted with the interior search. Engine 54-5 arrived on scene and was assigned RIT and 41-3 arrived and their crew was assigned to perform vertical ventilation. Engine 3 and Engine 6 arrived and were instructed to standby rear of Engine 4 for assignment. At 2056 hours, the scene was placed under control. Crews remained on scene and performed extensive overhaul to the residence. After this, the scene was turned over to the City od Dover Fire Marshal's office and Dover Police Criminal Investigation Unit. 01/09/2012 30046 2012-000022 11:17 1200 N DUPONT HWY False alarm or false call, other BURNT HAIR APT E56. 01/09/2012 30046 2012-000023 18:36 1300 S FARMVIEW DR D Cooking fire, confined to container Cooking fire contained to stove. 01/09/2012 30046 2012-000024 20:18 1225 WALKER RD Alarm system sounded due to malfunction Crews completed a walk through of the building and had negative results. Maintance was notified and units cleared with the alarm still sounding. 01/10/2012 30046 2012-000025 16:47 835 BAY RD False alarm or false call, other E4 responded for report of alarm sounding. Upon arrival crews investigated and found it was a false alarm. 01/10/2012 30046 2012-000026 19:32 537 S STATE ST Good intent call, other Dispatched to above address for a gas leak outside the structure. Upon arrival found an odor of sewer gas in the area. The origin of the smell was coming from the city sewer plant, at the rear of the arer. Good intent call. Cleared. 01/11/2012 30046 2012-000027 17:09 97 Commerce way Lock-out B9 responded and succesfully unlocked a TransCare ambulance that was transporting a patient from FMC at the above address. Minimal damage was done to drivers side paint inside the door area. 01/12/2012 30046 2012-000028 13:25 132 BLUE BEACH DR Cooking fire, confined to container Dispatched to the above location for a possible oven fire. Upon arrival, E-4's crews entered the residence and found a small plastic spatula had been left in the oven. The oven had been turned on by the home owner not knowing that there was a spatula inside. Crew's used an ABC extinguisher and put out the smoldering plastic. No extension noted and no mechanical ventilation required. Home owner was advised to let the plastic cool, then remove it and clean the area prior to using the oven again. State FM-13 was also on scene and witness same. Cleared the scene. User: O'Connor, Jr., Michael 01/12/2012 14:30:18 01/13/2012 30046 2012-000029 06:33 1200 N DUPONT HWY Arcing, shorted electrical equipment Transformer arching next to the Washington cottage. The building was checked for any problems and it was clear. City electric was requested for pole 5 and the scene was turned over to dsu police. 01/13/2012 30046 2012-000030 12:21 200 HIAWATHA LA 20 Cooking fire, confined to container Dispatched to above address for a oven fire. Upon arrival Dover PD on scene and had fire in the oven extinguished. Resident had oven in self clean mode but forgot to remove foil. Checked for extension. Cleared and turned over to bldg. maintenance. G.D.Whitt Asst. Chief 01/13/2012 30046 2012-000031 15:44 1300 S farmview drive Forest, woods or wildland fire WOODMILL APTS BRUSH FIRE 01/13/2012 30046 2012-000032 15:51 500 PERSIMMON TREE LA 6 Cooking fire, confined to container Dispatched to above address for a bldg. fire. Upon arrival found an unattended cooking on the stove. Had jump seat crew investigate, found a pot on the stove had burnt but the fire was out. Went under control and set up PP fan to remove smoke. Cleared. G.D.Whitt Asst. Chief 01/14/2012 30046 2012-000033 11:45 898 WOODCREST DR Cooking fire, confined to container Responded to the above address for a possible unattended cooking. Crew from ladder 1 investigated to find unattended cooking in apt 1/7. Scene was placed under control and turned over to maintenance. 01/14/2012 30046 2012-000034 12:24 234 S GOVERNORS BLVD Combustible/flammable gas/liquid condition, other DFD responded to the above location in reference to a possible gas leak inside the residence. On arrival, crews deteremined the odor was from a space heater. No action taken. 01/14/2012 30046 2012-000035 23:17 76 BEACON HILL DR Cooking fire, confined to container RESPONDED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS FOR A REPORT OF AN AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM ACTIVATION. AN INVESTIGATION FOUND BURNT POPCORN IN THE MICROWAVE ACTIVATED THE ALARM. NO DAMAGE WAS CAUSED, NO ACTION TAKEN 01/15/2012 30046 2012-000036 01:28 904 WHATCOAT DR Passenger vehicle fire Date: 02/27/2012 Page: 2 Time:08:25

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type RESPONDED TO THE PARKING LOT OF THE ABOVE ADDRESS FOR A REPORT OF A VEHICLE FIRE. UNITS ARRIVED ON LOCATION TO FIND A VEHICLE THAT HAD BEEN ON FIRE AND WAS MOSTLY EXTINGUISHED WITH AN ABC EXTINGUISHER PRIOR TO FD ARRIVAL. THERE WAS STILL SMOKE IN THE DASH AREA. UNITS REMOVED THE DASH TO CHECK FOR EXTENSION/ADDITIONAL FIRE. THE BATTERY WAS DISCONNECTED. BMX 325i STEVEN KAPPER DE# 973643 01/15/2012 30046 2012-000037 08:22 30 N NEW ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction Call from the resident reporting that his alarm had activated for an unknown reason and wanted the residence checked. 54-15 (Bundek) had just cleared a stand by for Dover so he was sent to the residence to investigate. 54-15 found a detector which had malfunctioned. Resident was advised to have it replaced. 01/15/2012 30046 2012-000038 21:52 451 BANK LA Overpressure rupture of air or gas pipe/pipeline Dispatched to an active gas leak at the Chesapeake Storage fascility. Upon arrival, observed a leak under pressure coming from what appeared to be a relief valve and standpipe. The utility company was contacted to respond. Rail service was temporarily shut down due to the proximity of the leak to the tracks. Once technicians were on scene, the discovered a failed relief valve in the metering house. The relief valve was reset and terminated the leak. Placed the situation under control and released rail traffic. User: O'Connor, Jr., Michael 01/15/2012 23:16:36 01/16/2012 30046 2012-000039 12:44 30 THE GREEN Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional On arrival occupant stated they were cleaning the basement and the detector activated from dust. Building checked with negetive results. 01/16/2012 30046 2012-000040 14:24 32 W LOOCKERMAN ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction On arrival found a smoke detector activated outside of Apt 306. Building checked with negetive results. Units cleared. 01/16/2012 30046 2012-000041 17:04 1191 JEFFERSON CT Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO On arrival occupant stated her CO detector started beeping this afternoon every few minutes. Residence was checked with FD gas meter with negetive results. Bad detector. Units cleared. 01/17/2012 30046 2012-000042 10:50 611 FOREST ST System malfunction, other Dispatched to above address for an automatic fire alarm. Upon arrival had crews from E4 and L2 investigate. They did not find anything and had the owner try to reset panel. Panel didn't reset, but went into trouble. Capt Hall advised tham to call thier alarm company to fix the system. Cleared. 01/17/2012 30046 2012-000043 16:17 11 LESTER CT Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other On the above date Dover Fire was alerted for report of a dryer fire inside the residence. Crews responded and found a electrical problem with the dryer. Dryer was removed for safety issues and homeowner was told to have electrician look into the problem. Homeowner was a Grant subject. 01/18/2012 30046 2012-000044 15:30 2030 PINE CABIN RD BLDG G Local alarm system, malicious false alarm PULL STATION FIRST FLOOR HALLWAY.R 01/18/2012 30046 2012-000045 15:55 141 N GOVERNORS BLVD Public service assistance, other CHILD LOCKED IN VEHICLE. SUBJECT EXTRICATED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT. 01/18/2012 30046 2012-000046 22:11 200 BANNING ST 170 Unintentional transmission of alarm, other On arrival cleaning personnel stated they were leaving when the AFA activated. Crews checked the building and found a pull station activated in the Post Op area. Pull station 1M003. Building checked with negetive results. All units cleared. No key card for front door entry in knox box. 01/18/2012 30046 2012-000047 23:59 1200 N DUPONT HWY Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional Dispatched to the above location for an AFA. Upon arrival, was met by DSU Security who advised burnt popcorn in the 3rd floor common area. Investigated and found same. Alarm was reset by security after investigation. Cleared scene. User: O'Connor, Jr., Michael 01/22/2012 14:42:40 01/19/2012 30046 2012-000048 13:32 124 S STATE ST Smoke scare, odor of smoke E4's Crews checked a faulty heating system on the roof. L1's crew also checked the rest of the building for a sign or smell of smoke with no findings. Units cleared and turned the scene over to FM2. 01/19/2012 30046 2012-000049 16:26 SAULSBURY RD Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle MVC with no entrapment. No action taken. 01/22/2012 30046 2012-000050 11:26 400 DOGWOOD AVE Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue Responded to the above address for a report of a chimney fire. Crew from engine 4 investigated to find embers falling into the bottom of the fire place. They called for a salvage bucket to remove all the debris. FF Rhodes then when to the attic to check for any possible extension and FF Bashista went to the roof to check for extension. Attic division advised that there was crack on the inside part of the chimney facing the attic with embers blowing in the attic. The roof division reported alot of heat coming from the siding so he opened it up to check for extension he also requested a water can. I advised dispatch to contact the on call FM. FF Bashista was able to get the remaining embers with the water can and attic confirmed they were now clear with no embers. Scene was placed under control and turned over to FM1. 01/22/2012 30046 2012-000051 14:12 492 BARRISTER PL Smoke scare, odor of smoke Dispatched to the above location for a smoke investigation. Dispatched received a single call relating black smoke coming from the above location. While en route, Dover PD went on location and found the situation under control (smoke from wood stove). Held response to a single engine. Upon arrival, crew investigated and learned that the homeowner had started his wood stove by using lighter fluid. It was also noted that there was a very large pile of wood inside in the rear of the residence. Home owner was advised that using lighter fluid was not safe indoors. Cleared the scene. Date: 02/27/2012 Page: 3 Time:08:25

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type User: O'Connor, Jr., Michael 01/22/2012 14:36:40 01/23/2012 30046 2012-000052 14:26 414 S GREENBERRY LANE Carbon monoxide incident On arrival checked the residence and found 28ppm of CO in the residence. Chesapeake Utilities responded and the scene was turned over to same. Dover 17 cleared. 01/24/2012 30046 2012-000053 08:12 120 S GOVERNORS AVE A Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional On arrival crews found unattended cooking in the kitchen of the structure. Occupants were cooking meatballs that smoked up the kitchen and activated the alarm. All units cleared. 01/24/2012 30046 2012-000054 12:51 21 N STATE ST Smoke detector activation due to malfunction On arival building manager advised there was a smoke detector activation outside Apt 330. Crews checked the area with negative results. All units cleared. 01/24/2012 30046 2012-000055 14:07 820 CARVEL DR J Smoke or odor removal E4 ARRIVED TO FIND A TRASH CAN THAT WAS SET ON FIRE IN THE BASEMENT OF BUILDING J. DOVER 21 (M.CAREY) WAS ALSO ADVISED OF A TRASH CAN ON FIRE IN THE BASEMENT OF BUILDING I. CREWS REMOVED THE TRASH CAN THAT WAS ALREADY EXTINGUISHED BY RESIDENCES AND PROVIDED POSITIVE PRESSURE. UNITS CLEARED AND THE SCENE WAS TURNED OVER TO FM 1, FM2, AND DOVER POLICE. 01/24/2012 30046 2012-000056 14:07 820 CARVEL DR I Smoke or odor removal E4 ARRIVED TO FIND A TRASH CAN THAT WAS SET ON FIRE IN THE BASEMENT OF BUILDING I. DOVER 21 (M.CAREY) WAS ALSO ADVISED OF A TRASH CAN ON FIRE IN THE BASEMENT OF BUILDING J. CREWS REMOVED THE TRASH CAN THAT WAS ALREADY EXTINGUISHED BY RESIDENCES. UNITS CLEARED AND THE SCENE WAS TURNED OVER TO FM 1, FM2, AND DOVER POLICE. 01/24/2012 30046 2012-000057 14:57 25 S NEW ST Cooking fire, confined to container E4'S CREW FOUND A OVEN FIRE THAT WAS EXTINGUISHED PRIOR TO OUR ARRIVAL. E4 PROVIDED POSITIVE PRESSURE AND E4 CLEARED. 01/24/2012 30046 2012-000058 23:52 332 LOCUST POINT PL False alarm or false call, other DFD responded to the above address in reference to an alarm activation. On arrival, the home owner advised he had a water leak which got inot the detector. This is the reason the alarm activated. No further action taken. 01/25/2012 30046 2012-000059 02:45 208 PRESIDENT DR Hazardous condition, other DFD responded to the above address in reference to a possible gas leak inside the residence. On arrival, crews determined the odor was emitting from a space heater. No action taken. 01/26/2012 30046 2012-000060 16:52 956 WHATCOAT DR Cooking fire, confined to container Unattended cooking. No action taken. 01/26/2012 30046 2012-000061 18:26 139 SEWAN CIR CO detector activation due to malfunction Dispatched to above address for a CO detector activation with injuries. Upon arrival found B63 on scene. B63 advised that there were no injuries but the CO detector had sounded. Crew from E4 investigated and found that the detector had malfunctioned. Told home owner of same and to change the battery. Cleared all units. G.D.Whitt Asst. Chief Dover Fire Dept. 01/27/2012 30046 2012-000062 07:24 101 S QUEEN ST Good intent call, other Dover Fire was alerted for report of a smoke detector going off in the above residence. Crews arrived on scene and found an abandoned residence with a audible smoke detector. Crews forced entry thru the front door and cleared the residence. Scene was placed under control and turned over to City Inspections and Dover PD. 01/27/2012 30046 2012-000063 07:39 654 N DUPONT HWY Extrication, rescue, other E4 and L1 responded for report of a subject with her hand trapped in the engine block to her vehicle in the parking lot of above. Upon arrival A63 had already removed the patient and was preparting for transport. Scene was placed under control and victim was transported to KGH. 01/27/2012 30046 2012-000064 18:17 350 S QUEEN ST Good intent call, other GOOD INTENT CALL FOR ODOR OF GAS. 01/27/2012 30046 2012-000065 18:52 75 MCDANIEL DR Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire confined On arrival found a 1 story single family dwelling with smoke in the structure. Occupant stated her kerosene heater had caught on fire in the house and that she had extinguished the fire. Occupant also removed the heater from the structure prior to FD arrival. Crews checked the residence with negative results. Crew set up positive pressure to ventilate the house. Scene turned over to the occupant all units cleared. 01/28/2012 30046 2012-000066 19:15 164 NORWICH WAY Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire Dispatched to the above location for a fire investigation. Upon arrival, found an open burn in a back yard. The home owner was burning an old tree fort. Advised the home owner of proper procedures and open burning regulations. Home owner extinguished the fire with the garden hose. No further action required. User: O'Connor, Jr., Michael 01/29/2012 06:45:31 01/29/2012 30046 2012-000067 12:13 1 E WALNUT ST Cover assignment, standby, moveup Engine cover assignment Station 55 Magnolia. 01/29/2012 30046 2012-000068 17:37 S STATE ST & BEECHWOOD AVE Good intent call, other 21 checked the area for a small fire on top of a picnic table. 21 checked the area with negative results. 01/29/2012 30046 2012-000069 23:08 1131 N DUPONT HWY Hazardous condition, other Date: 02/27/2012 Page: 4 Time:08:25

Date FDID Incident# Alarm ### Address Suite Type L1 AND E4 CREWS FOUND A DISH WASHER THAT WAS EXTINGUSHED PRIOR TO OUR ARRIVAL BY DOVER DOWNS SECURITY. THE POWER WAS SECURED TO THE KITCHEN AREA ON THE SECOND FLOOR. ( BANQUET KITCHEN BREAKER.) CREWS CLEARED WITH NO FURTHER ACTION NEEDED AND TURNED THE SCENE OVER TO DOVER DOWNS SECURITY. 01/30/2012 30046 2012-000070 14:31 259 NORTHDOWN DR Smoke detector activation due to malfunction Smoke detector activation in vacant townhouse. Unfounded reason. 01/30/2012 30046 2012-000071 15:02 298 S DUPONT WHY Motor vehicle accident with injuries Responded to MVC with reported entrapment. Upon arrival a single patient had self extricated and was being treated by ALS/BLS 01/31/2012 30046 2012-000072 03:06 161 WESTMINSTER DR Cooking fire, confined to container Food burned on the stove by elderly gentelman. Total Incidents: 72

FY 11-12 City Funded Account Balance Sheet ACCOUNT BUDGET SPENT BALANCE Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance $ 62,000.00 $ 53,061.41 $ 8,938.59 Gasoline $ 19,050.00 $ 11,728.37 $ 7,321.63 Medical Supplies $ 700.00 $ 700.00 Other Equipment Repairs $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Program Expenses $ 36,630.00 $ 29,565.14 $ 7,064.86 Radio Repairs $ 2,000.00 $ 652.27 $ 1,347.73 Safety & Security $ 2,150.00 $ 2,013.72 $ 136.28 Small Tools $ 4,800.00 $ 4,816.73 $ (16.73) Uniforms & Firefighting Gear $ 26,100.00 $ 19,342.49 $ 6,757.51 Building Expenses- Electricity $ 51,820.00 $ 30,478.86 $ 21,341.14 Building Maintenance Supplies $ 1,650.00 $ 62.31 $ 1,587.69 Heating Expenses- Gas $ 20,000.00 $ 4,903.72 $ 15,096.28 Telephone $ 20,340.00 $ 3,928.49 $ 16,411.51 Water & Sewer $ 3,150.00 $ 756.92 $ 2,393.08 Contractual Services $ 16,587.00 $ 16,587.00 Training & Travel $ 8,815.00 $ 4,184.00 $ 4,631.00 Pension $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 Office Supplies $ 2,500.00 $888.90 $ 1,611.10 Balance as of: 01/31/12

4:13 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 02/27/12 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail January 2012 Type Date Num Name Memo Clr Split Amount Balance Ordinary Income/Expense Income City Quarterly Deposit Deposit 01/27/2012 220092 Deposit City Fund Account 70,323.00 70,323.00 Total City Quarterly Deposit 70,323.00 70,323.00 Total Income 70,323.00 70,323.00 Expense Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance Check 01/15/2012 578 Atlantic Emergency Solutions Invoice # MOR1585MOP City Fund Account 3,419.17 3,419.17 Check 01/15/2012 583 Dover Automotive Invoice # 470213 City Fund Account 213.88 3,633.05 Check 01/22/2012 588 Atlantic Emergency Solutions Invoice-MOR1569MOP City Fund Account 525.19 4,158.24 Check 01/27/2012 590 Atlantic Emergency Solutions MORO653MOP City Fund Account 443.40 4,601.64 Check 01/27/2012 590 Atlantic Emergency Solutions MCR0661MC City Fund Account 1,013.11 5,614.75 Check 01/27/2012 590 Atlantic Emergency Solutions MOR1516MOP City Fund Account 1,322.42 6,937.17 Check 01/27/2012 590 Atlantic Emergency Solutions MOR1088MOP City Fund Account 738.52 7,675.69 Check 01/27/2012 593 Delmarva Kenworth Invoice DK186457 City Fund Account 113.96 7,789.65 Total Apparatus Repairs & Maintenance 7,789.65 7,789.65 Electricity Check 01/07/2012 576 City of Dover Utility 44343-32052 City Fund Account 3,038.46 3,038.46 Check 01/15/2012 581 City of Dover Utility Acct # 44255-31966 City Fund Account 584.66 3,623.12 Total Electricity 3,623.12 3,623.12 Gasoline Check 01/27/2012 592 City of Dover Oct & Nov Unleaded City Fund Account 770.07 770.07 Check 01/27/2012 592 City of Dover Oct & Nov Bio Diesel City Fund Account 3,121.77 3,891.84 Total Gasoline 3,891.84 3,891.84 Heating Expenses- Gas Check 01/15/2012 580 Chesapeake Utilities Acct # 01-72348-3180-1 City Fund Account 1,754.30 1,754.30 Check 01/15/2012 580 Chesapeake Utilities Acct # 01-300566-14195-1 City Fund Account 429.56 2,183.86 Total Heating Expenses- Gas 2,183.86 2,183.86 Office Supplies Check 01/21/2012 587 Staples Certificate Paper City Fund Account 6.29 6.29 Check 01/27/2012 592 City of Dover Oct & Nov Postage Charges City Fund Account 78.18 84.47 Total Office Supplies 84.47 84.47 Program Expenses Check 01/15/2012 577 Airpower International Annual Maintenance Contract for Air Compressor City Fund Account 1,883.00 1,883.00 Check 01/15/2012 585 Witmer Public Safety Inv # 1300157 City Fund Account 924.84 2,807.84 Check 01/15/2012 586 Witmer Public Safety Inv # 1141284 City Fund Account 101.83 2,909.67 Check 01/27/2012 596 Municipal Emergency Services Invoice-00286755_SNV City Fund Account 10,097.70 13,007.37 Total Program Expenses 13,007.37 13,007.37 Small Tolls Check 01/15/2012 586 Witmer Public Safety Inv # 1310927 City Fund Account 173.00 173.00 Total Small Tolls 173.00 173.00 Telephone Check 01/07/2012 575 Chief Technologies, LLC Invoice # 605 City Fund Account 342.00 342.00 Check 01/27/2012 592 City of Dover Oct & Nov Verizon Charges City Fund Account 486.08 828.08 Check 01/27/2012 592 City of Dover Oct & Nov Cavalier Charges City Fund Account 35.35 863.43 Total Telephone 863.43 863.43 Page 1 of 2

4:13 PM Robbins Hose Company # 1, Inc. 02/27/12 Accrual Basis Profit & Loss Detail January 2012 Type Date Num Name Memo Clr Split Amount Balance Training & Travel Expenses Check 01/15/2012 582 Delaware Safety Council 15 students City Fund Account 300.00 300.00 Total Training & Travel Expenses 300.00 300.00 Uniforms Check 01/15/2012 579 Charles Boyer Ticket # 219116 City Fund Account 21.25 21.25 Check 01/15/2012 584 Municipal Emergency Services Inv 00286272_SNV City Fund Account 1,075.57 1,096.82 Check 01/22/2012 589 Witmer Public Safety Invoice- 1307293 City Fund Account 889.60 1,986.42 Check 01/27/2012 591 Charles Boyer Invoice- 219117 City Fund Account 81.60 2,068.02 Check 01/27/2012 594 Dover Army-Navy Store Invoice # 18922 City Fund Account 629.20 2,697.22 Check 01/27/2012 595 Municipal Emergency Services Invoice-00282231_SNV City Fund Account 6,585.82 9,283.04 Total Uniforms 9,283.04 9,283.04 Water/Sewer Check 01/07/2012 576 City of Dover Utility 44345-32054 City Fund Account 46.25 46.25 Check 01/07/2012 576 City of Dover Utility 44341-32050 City Fund Account 11.54 57.79 Check 01/15/2012 581 City of Dover Utility Acct # 44253-31964 City Fund Account 20.96 78.75 Total Water/Sewer 78.75 78.75 Total Expense 41,278.53 41,278.53 Net Ordinary Income 29,044.47 29,044.47 Net Income 29,044.47 29,044.47 Page 2 of 2

Page 1 of 5 City of Dover Capital Investment Plan Project Tracking Report January 31, 2012 Points to Remember - * Original Project Budget = Original Total Project Budget initially included in approved annual budget. * Latest Project Budget = Revised Total Project Budget included in most recent approved annual budget or one of the following: bond resolution, revolving fund loan agreement, Council approved budget amendment, or City Manager approved amendment as per the Budget Amendment Procedure. * Current Fiscal Year - Revised Fiscal Year Budget = Current Year approved project budgets plus carry forward balances of unspent budgets in the prior fiscal year. Project Carry Forward balances will be submitted to City Council for amendment in January 2010. Can also be amended with City Manager approval per the Budget Amendment Procedure. * Water Quality, Inflow/Infiltration, Distribution Upgrades and New Development projects are budgeted as a blanket project and once individual projects are identified and estimated they are created using an allocation of the overall budgeted amount. * Status and Comments provided by City Manager. * For Finance purposes projects are considered completed when placed in service and all charges have been processed. Community Water & Total Current Year Budget Funding Sources General Transportation Wastewater Electric CIP Budget Balance $ 78,000 $ 118,588 $ 430,591 $ 360,333 $ 987,512 Library Funding - FY11 Budget Balance 100,962 - - 87,045 188,007 Federal and/or State Grants 7,422,183 1,400,000 - - 8,822,183 Library Green Energy/Bridge Loan 2,700,000 - - - 2,700,000 Friends of the Library Donation 210,000 - - - 210,000 Kent County Library Contribution 1,000,000 - - - 1,000,000 Library Reserve 2,590,784 - - - 2,590,784 Construction Loan 274,961 - - - 274,961 Community Transportation Fund - FY11 Balances - 678,612 - - 678,612 Revolving Fund Loans - - 4,309,821 - 4,309,821 Transfer from Capital Reserves - - - 370,730 370,730 Impact Fees - - 867,032 - 867,032 Loan Proceeds - Streets & City Hall 1,970,000 - - - 1,970,000 Transfer Loan Proceeds to CT Fund - Streets - 875,000 - - 875,000 Transfer from Operating Funds 623,847 - 1,750,000 3,500,000 5,873,847 Interest Earned 10,900 2,800 - 38,400 52,100 Total Funding Sources (Unaudited) $ 16,981,637 $ 3,075,000 $ 7,357,444 $ 4,356,508 $ 31,770,589

City of Dover General Fund - Major CIP Projects Page 2 of 5 January, 2012 Hide TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project Current Revised Fiscal Project Project Project To Date Budget % Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD % Budget Code Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY2009 Bid Pack A - Done. 2 LB0901 M/G New Library Project $ 18,200,000 $ 20,469,080 $ 8,341,416 $ 12,127,664 40.8% $ 11,195,009 $ 14,298,890 $ 4,171,226 29.2% Started Bid Pack B - 40% Complete/Construction 3 Totals - FY09 $ 18,200,000 $ 20,469,080 $ 8,341,416 $ 12,127,664 40.8% $ 11,195,009 $ 14,298,890 $ 4,171,226 29.2% 4 5 FY2012 6 --- Ann FD Truck Payment $ 244,820 $ 244,820 $ 216,794 $ 28,026 88.6% $ 244,820 $ 244,820 $ 216,794 88.6% Sweeper due in Jan. 2012; Sanitation 7 --- Vehicles & Equipment 377,927 377,927 29,299 348,628 7.8% 377,927 377,927 29,299 7.8% Truck due in March 2012; Roof Replacement @ 8 PR1201 Dover Park 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 0.0% 30,000 30,000 - 0.0% 9 CT Fund B/L Streets & Alleys Program 1,000,000 1,750,000 - 1,750,000 0.0% 1,000,000 1,750,000 - 0.0% Pending financing 10 ST1202 Concrete Program 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 0.0% 30,000 30,000 - 0.0% Bid development in process Streets Dump Truck 11 ST1203 Refurbishment 30,000 30,000 1,521 28,479 5.1% 30,000 30,000 1,521 5.1% In progress 12 City Hall Sprinkler System - - - - 0.0% - 220,000 - 0.0% 13 Totals - FY12 $ 1,712,747 $ 2,462,747 $ 247,614 $ 2,215,133 10.1% $ 1,712,747 $ 2,682,747 $ 247,614 9.2% 14 15 Grand Totals $ 19,912,747 $ 22,931,827 $ 8,589,030 $ 14,342,797 37.5% $ 12,907,756 $ 16,981,637 $ 4,418,840 26.0% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is re-budgeted to start over each fiscal year. G = Grant funded project B/L = To be financed through bonds or commercial loan; Projects will be completed through CT Fund, therefore the loan proceeds will be transferred from Capital Fund into the Community Transportation Fund

City of Dover Community Transportation & General Fund Street Funds - Major CIP Projects Page 3 of 5 January, 2012 Hide TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project Current Revised Fiscal Project Project Project To Date Budget % Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD % Budget Code Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY 2007 2 CT0708 M E. Water Street Brick $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - $ 65,000 0.0% $ - $ 65,000 $ - 0.0% Specialty contract needed. 3 Totals $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ - $ 65,000 0.0% $ - $ 65,000 $ - 0.0% 4 5 FY 2009 6 CT0977 M Schutte Parking Lot $ 21,950 $ 21,950 $ - $ 21,950 0.0% $ - $ 21,950 $ - 0.0% Deferred 7 CT1165 M Rte. 13,N. State -Kings Hwy 591,662 591,662 - 591,662 0.0% - 591,662 - 0.0% 8 Totals $ 613,612 $ 613,612 $ - $ 21,950 0.0% $ - $ 613,612 $ - 0.0% 9 10 FY2012 Concrete work on Independence 11 CT M Street Projects - State Funds $ 950,000 $ 800,000 $ 9,135 $ 790,865 1.1% $ 950,000 $ 121,388 $ 9,135 7.5% In process Blvd complete Concrete work on Hazel to 12 Various B/L Street Projects - General Fund 350,000 1,750,000 15,300 1,734,700 0.9% 350,000 875,000 15,300 In process proceed in January/February 13 CT1201 M North Street Roundabout - 500,000 - 500,000 0.0% - 500,000 - 0.0% In process 60% complete 14 TE1201 M Lincoln Park Center 900,000 900,000 4,788 895,212 0.0% 900,000 900,000 4,788 0.5% 15 Totals $ 2,200,000 $ 3,950,000 $ 29,223 $ 3,920,777 0.7% $ 2,200,000 $ 2,396,388 $ 29,223 1.3% 16 17 Grand Totals $ 2,878,612 $ 4,628,612 $ 29,223 $ 4,007,727 0.6% $ 2,200,000 $ 3,075,000 $ 29,223 1.3% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is re-budgeted to start over each fiscal year. C = Project funded by combination of CT Funds and General Fund B/L = To be financed through bonds or commercial loan; Projects will be completed through CT Fund, therefore the loan proceeds will be transferred from Capital Fund into the Community Transportation Fund;

City of Dover Water/Wastewater Improvement & Extension Fund - Major CIP Projects Page 4 of 5 January, 2012 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project % Approved Revised Fiscal % Project Project Project To Date Budget Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD Budget Code Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY 2008 Option to purchase land agreement 2 WD0804 M 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage $ 4,196,600 $ 2,590,000 $ 29,099 $ 2,560,901 1.1% $ - $ 178,916 $ 8,015 4.5% Started under review 3 WD0805 M Piney Point Well 398,800 665,000 69,316 595,684 10.4% - 147,319 1,634 1.1% Started DNREC permitting ongoing US 13 East Sanitary Sewer 4 WW0810 M/SL Interceptor 2,376,800 3,022,562 3,231,960 (209,398) 106.9% - 295,722 286,361 96.8% Complete Complete 5 Totals - FY08 $ 6,972,200 $ 6,277,562 $ 3,330,375 $ 2,947,187 53.1% $ - $ 621,957 $ 296,010 47.6% 6 7 FY2009 8 WQ0905 M/SL Bayard Avenue $ 590,910 $ 490,910 $ 475,888 $ 15,022 96.9% $ - $ 239,121 $ 189,098 79.1% In process Complete; Final invoice Jan 2012; 9 WQ0907 M/SL Route 13 Water Main 1,058,700 2,282,682 1,944,598 338,084 85.2% - 1,869,872 1,531,787 81.9% In process Constr complete; Punchlist & Insp; 10 Totals - FY09 $ 1,649,610 $ 2,773,592 $ 2,420,485 $ 353,107 87.3% $ - $ 2,108,993 $ 1,720,885 81.6% 11 12 FY2010 Work is complete; close out 13 WW1001 M/SL Inflow/Infiltration Removal $ 1,800,000 $ 2,122,536 $ 1,761,684 $ 360,852 83.0% $ 1,800,000 $ 766,201 $ 404,128 52.7% In process documents/final invoice in progress 14 WW1007 M/SL Fox Hall Pump Station 427,900 392,044 50,491 341,553 12.9% - 360,687 278 0.1% Started Will start after Heatherfield; 15 WW1008 M/SL Heatherfield F/M Rerouting 220,400 324,916 48,973 275,943 15.1% - 237,506 278 0.1% Started Project 75% complete; Not paid yet; Resolution of easement issue 16 WW1010 I Tar Ditch Interceptor Upgrade 518,230 518,230 28,014 490,216 5.4% - 495,359 5,143 1.0% Started pending; 17 Totals - FY10 $ 2,966,530 $ 3,357,726 $ 1,889,162 $ 1,468,564 56.3% $ 1,800,000 $ 1,859,753 $ 409,828 22.0% 18 19 FY2011 20 WQ1103 WQI - Ross Street - 71,840 - 71,840 0.0% 71,840 36,840 - 0.0% Preliminary design complete 21 WW1101 M/SL Inflow/Infiltration Removal 500,000 500,000 364,340 135,660 72.9% - 457,601 321,940 70.4% Started Project 97% complete; 22 WW1104 SL Lepore Road P/S Replacement 52,000 402,000 71,661 330,339 17.8% 350,000 350,000 16,125 4.6% Started Final design revisions pending; 23 Totals - FY11 $ 552,000 $ 973,840 $ 436,001 $ 537,839 44.8% $ 421,840 $ 844,441 $ 338,065 40.0% 24 25 FY2012 26 --- Vehicles & Equipment $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 110,514 $ 4,486 96.1% $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 110,514 96.1% In process Vehicles received; 27 WD1201 Pay-As-You-Go Water Station 30,240 30,240 - 30,240 0.0% 30,240 30,240 - 0.0% Specs being developed 28 WD1202 R Misc. Distribution Upgrades 60,000 60,000 5,706 54,294 9.5% 60,000 60,000 5,706 9.5% Misc. repairs or emergencies 29 WD1203 R Wellhead Redevelopment Program 65,000 65,000 42,821 22,179 65.9% 65,000 65,000 42,821 65.9% In process Well #1 complete; Well #9 rehab 30 WD1204 R Emergency Generators 80,000 80,000 - 80,000 0.0% 80,000 - - 0.0% Grant dependent 31 WQ1201 WQI - Wesley Campus 51,200 51,200 - 51,200 0.0% 51,200 51,200 - 0.0% Installation to begin late February 32 WQ1202 WQI - New Street 97,120 97,120 9,600.00 87,520 9.9% 97,120 97,120 9,600 9.9% Started Design started; 33 WQ1203 WQI - Silver Lake 279,840 279,840 98,585.59 181,254 35.2% 279,840 279,840 98,586 35.2% In process Construction started 34 WW1201 M/SL Inflow/Infiltration Removal 1,000,000 1,000,000 22,725 977,275 2.3% 1,000,000 1,000,000 22,725 2.3% Started Design started, early spring const. 35 WW1202 R SCADA Equipment Replacement 84,900 84,900 65,696 19,204 77.4% 84,900 84,900 65,696 77.4% In process Project 50% complete 36 WW1203 R Misc. Sewer System Improve 37,000 37,000 9,935 27,065 26.9% 37,000 37,000 9,935 26.9% Misc. repairs or emergencies 37 WW1204 M Wilmington College Pump Station 25,000 25,000 8,627 16,373 34.5% 25,000 25,000 8,627 34.5% Started Design started - actually Baltray PS 38 WW1205 M Dover Brook Gardens P/S Replace 15,000 15,000 3,345.57 11,654 22.3% 15,000 15,000 3,346 22.3% Started Design started 39 WW1206 M Brandywine Pump Station Replace 52,000 52,000 12,624.52 39,375 24.3% 52,000 52,000 12,625 24.3% Started Design started McKee Rd Pump Station Design started 40 WW1207 M Communator Replacement 10,000 10,000 2,050.62 7,949 20.5% 10,000 10,000 2,051 20.5% 41 $ 2,002,300 $ 2,002,300 $ 392,229.63 $ 1,610,070 0.0% $ 2,002,300 $ 1,922,300 $ 392,230 20.4% 42 43 Grand Totals $ 14,142,640 $ 15,385,020 $ 8,468,254 $ 6,916,766 55.0% $ 4,224,140 $ 7,357,444 $ 3,157,018 42.9% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is re-budgeted to start over each fiscal year. SL = State Loan Project - construction phase is financed I = Impact Fee (partially) financed project

City of Dover Electric Improvement & Extension Fund - Major CIP Projects Page 5 of 5 January, 2012 TOTAL PROJECT - PAST, CURRENT & FUTURE BUDGETS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR Original Latest Project Project % Current Revised Fiscal % Project Project Project To Date Budget Budget Fiscal Yr. Fiscal Yr. YTD Budget Code Type Description Budget Budget Expenses Balance Spent Budget Budget Expenses Spent Status Comments 1 FY2011 2 EG1102 M Units 1 & 2 Cooling Tower 372,400 199,140 134,538 64,602 67.6% 25,410 25,410 400 1.6% Work deferred to 2012 3 EG1107 M Units 1 & 2 Life Extension 802,000 409,000 269,517 139,483 65.9% 184,000 196,331 56,848 29.0% Motor work this spring 4 EG1112 M Unit 3 Heat Expansion Joint - 150,000 143,508 6,492 95.7% 70,000 82,807 76,315 92.2% Complete 5 EG1113 Units 1 & 2 Control Modifications - 150,000 138,733 11,267 92.5% - 25,700 14,432 56.2% Started Complete w/Spring outage 6 EG1114 Unit 3 Gas Line Modification - 60,000 39,516 20,484 65.9% - 36,207 15,723 43.4% Complete 7 $ 1,174,400 $ 968,140 $ 725,812 $ 242,328 75.0% $ 279,410 $ 366,455 $ 163,719 44.7% 8 9 FY2012 10 --- Vehicles & Equipment $ 168,828 $ 168,828 $ 71,241 $ 97,587 42.2% $ 168,828 $ 144,328 $ 71,241 49.4% All vehicles received 11 EE1201 Substation PT & CT Replacement 267,715 267,715 188,708 79,007 70.5% 267,715 267,715 188,708 70.5% In process 75% materials received 12 EE1202 R Lighting Project & Rehabilitation 50,000 50,000 49,832 168 99.7% 50,000 50,000 49,832 99.7% Complete 13 EE1203 R Equipment Replacement 40,000 40,000 10,525 29,475 26.3% 40,000 40,000 10,525 26.3% In process Equipment ordered 14 EE1204 Generator Replacement 50,000 50,000 30,961 19,039 61.9% 50,000 50,000 30,961 61.9% Complete 15 EE1205 M Frazier Substation Upgrade 765,247 155,000 110,881 44,119 71.5% 155,000 155,000 110,881 71.5% In process Materials ordered 16 EE1206 R Disb. Feeder Replacement 377,510 377,510 238,729 138,781 63.2% 377,510 377,510 238,729 63.2% In process On-going 17 EE1207 R Disb. Capacitors & Controls 100,000 100,000 26,494 73,506 26.5% 100,000 100,000 26,494 26.5% In process Materials ordered 18 EE1208 R Transmission Line Maintenance 75,000 75,000 26,967 48,033 36.0% 75,000 75,000 26,967 36.0% Started Materials ordered Scada Master Hardware 19 EE1209 Replacement 75,000 75,000 71,560 3,440 95.4% 75,000 75,000 71,560 95.4% Started Materials ordered 20 EE1210 Substation Battery - 24,500 15,251 9,249 62.2% 24,500 24,500 15,251 62.2% In process 60% materials received 21 EE1212 R UG Transformers 70,536 70,536 49,651 20,885 70.4% 70,536 70,536 49,651 70.4% In process On-going 22 EE1212 R UG Conductors 479,464 479,464 193,856 285,608 40.4% 479,464 479,464 193,856 40.4% In process On-going 23 EE1212 R Meters 50,000 50,000 17,652 32,348 35.3% 50,000 50,000 17,652 35.3% In process On-going 24 EG1201 Unit 3 Boiler Air Heater 440,000 440,000 76,677 363,323 17.4% 440,000 440,000 76,677 17.4% Started Bid rec'd; CAF to Council 2/12 25 EG1202 M Unit 3 Boiler Systems 390,000 130,000 - 130,000 0.0% 130,000 130,000 0.0% Will complete Spring outage; Unit 3 FD & ID Fan Control Damper 26 EG1203 Upgrade 92,000 92,000 1,478 90,522 1.6% 92,000 92,000 1,478 1.6% Started Developing contract scope/bid Unit 3 DCS Computers & Software 27 EG1204 Upgrades 85,000 85,000 - 85,000 0.0% 85,000 85,000 - 0.0% To be completed by 6/3012; 28 EG1205 R Misc. Equipment Replacement 70,000 70,000 21,280 48,720 30.4% 70,000 70,000 21,280 30.4% In process On-going; 50% complete Demineralizer Control Replace @ 29 EG1206 McKee Run 65,000 65,000 - 65,000 0.0% 65,000 65,000 - 0.0% Bids in Feb; Complete by June Unit 11 Component Replacement @ 30 EG1207 M Van Sant 50,000 50,000 24,595 25,405 49.2% 50,000 50,000 24,595 49.2% In process Remaining scoped in devlpmnt Switchyard Blast Walls @ McKee Developing work scope; To be 31 EG1208 Run 50,000 50,000 5,328 44,672 10.7% 50,000 50,000 5,328 10.7% In process completed June 2012 32 EG1209 M Building Preservation @ McKee Run 38,000 38,000 5,650 32,350 14.9% 38,000 38,000 5,650 14.9% In process Sent out bids; Completion 6/12 Unit 3 Cooling Water Line Life 33 EG1210 M Extension 25,000 25,000 - 25,000 0.0% 25,000 25,000 - 0.0% Defer to FY13 34 EG1211 M Unit 3 Stack Repairs 25,000 25,000 - 25,000 0.0% 25,000 25,000 - 0.0% On track for spring outage; Bid 35 EG1212 M Unit 3 Turbine Inspection 1,021,000 348,000 8,634 339,366 2.5% 348,000 348,000 8,634 2.5% In process High bid; Council amendment; Partial completion; scope to 36 EG1213 M Unit 3 Aux System Components 542,000 113,000 47,682 65,318 42.2% 113,000 113,000 47,682 42.2% In process finish being developed 37 EU1201 R Distribution Upgrades 500,000 500,000 230,655 269,345 46.1% 500,000 500,000 230,655 46.1% In process On-going 38 $ 5,962,300 $ 4,014,553 $ 1,524,285 $ 2,490,268 0.0% $ 4,014,553 $ 3,990,053 $ 1,524,285 38.2% 39 40 Grand Totals $ 7,136,700 $ 4,982,693 $ 2,250,097 $ 2,732,596 25.0% $ 4,293,963 $ 4,356,508 $ 1,688,004 38.7% Legend M = Multi-year project - a project with a specific schedule to occur over multiple years. R = Recurring project - a project that begins and ends each fiscal year and is re-budgeted to start over each fiscal year. B = Bonded Project S = State fully or partially reimbursed project

City Assessor’s Office MEMO TO: Mayor & Council FROM: Cheryl A. Russell, AAS RE: Property Assessment Appeal Dates I request the following dates and times be established for the 2012 Property Assessment Appeals. May 21, 2012 - May 25, 2012 9:00 A.M. until 4:00 P.M. May 29, 2012 - June 1, 2012 9:00 A.M. until 4:00 P.M.* The hearing times are subject to change. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Assessor’s Office. *If Needed

BAIRD MANDALAS llc ATTORNEYS AT LAW 103 S. Bradford Street Dover, Delaware 19904 (302)677-0061 (Tel.) (302) 677-0065 (FAX) AUTHOR'S EMAIL: glenn@bairdmandalas.com March 7,2012 Scott Koenig, City Manager City Hall -15 Loockerman Plaza Dover, Delaware 19903 RE: City of Dover Labor Negotiations Dear City Manager Koenig: Thank you for selecting Baird Mandalas, LLC to represent the City of Dover in connection with labor negotiations with the Dover Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 15 ("FOP"), the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1238 ("IBEW"), and the Dover Organization of Employees ("DOE"). This letter will confirm the terms of my firm's engagement. I will have primary responsibility for your representation but I may use other firm lawyers and legal assistants as appropriate under the circumstances. The specific terms of my firm's engagement are as follows: 1. Fees and Hourly Rates: My firm's fee to negotiate collective bargaining agreements outside of mediation, arbitration, or litigation between the City and the FOP, the City and DOE, and the wage and benefits portion of the IBEW collective bargaining agreement shall be FIFTY- FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS (555,000). The fee shall be for the limited services aforementioned and shall be earned as follows: l-'ee Schedule $4,487.50 Due now for services already rendered (see enclosed invoices) 57,500 per month for an estimated four months, and due on the 10th day of the subsequent month for each of March, April, May, and June, 2012. 530,000.00 (in four monthly installments) For negotiating sessions, negotiating preparations, telephone calls, research, preparation of correspondence and memorandums, and other related activities. $12,000.00 Due upon the execution of the FOP collective bargaining agreement. $5,000.00 Due upon the execution of the DOE collective bargaining agreement. Due upon the execution of an agreement on the wage and benefits $3,512.50 portion of the IBEW collective bargaining agreement. $55,000 (Total)

March 7, 2012 Page 2 Any additional services including mediation, arbitration, and litigation, and tasks associated with mediation, arbitration, and litigation, shall be additional services not included in the fee schedule above, and shall be separately invoiced at the hourly rate of $160 per hour. I may rely upon other lawyers and assistants in my firm for additional services including Kevin Baird, Esquire, and Michael Hoffman, Esquire, whose services shall also be invoiced at the hourly rate of $160 per hour. 2. Billing: My firm will provide you with monthly invoices that itemize all fees and costs expended on your behalf. All invoices are due and payable upon receipt, and any balances which remain outstanding more than 60 days may accrue interest. 3. Retainer: My firm will not require an advance retainer for this representation. If we receive any money from you that is not for fees earned or costs it will be placed into our Rule 1.15 attorney trust account and will be applied to future invoices. Any of those funds remaining in our trust account at the end of this representation will be returned to you. 4. Expedited Matters: Should you require our services on an expedited or emergency basis, we may charge at a higher rate. 5. Termination for Non-Pavment: We reserve the right to terminate our attorney/client relationship for non-payment of fees and costs. 6. Costs: "Costs" include any and all out-of-pocket expenses, such as filing fees, transcript costs, expert fees, copying costs, long distance telephone calls, cellular telephone charges, and travel expenses. All costs expended on your behalf will be itemized and billed on each monthly statement. 7. Documents/files: 1 may send you documents, correspondence, and other information throughout the representation. These copies will be your file copies, please retain them. I will also keep the information in a file in my office, which will be my file. At the conclusion of your matter, I will close my file and store your file for approximately five years. I will destroy the file after that period unless you instruct me in writing now to keep your file longer. 8. Miscellaneous. Every effort will be made to keep you well informed as to the progress of all matters at all times. Please feel free to call at any time to discuss the present status or any other aspect of any matter. I have made no guarantees regarding the disposition of any phase of any matters in which the City has sought or may seek my assistance, and any estimation of the probable outcome is expressed only as an opinion.

March 7, 2012 Page 3 At your earliest opportunity, please countersign this agreement and return it in the enclosed envelope so that we will have a mutual memorandum of our understanding. ENN C. MANDALAS GCM/lss AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD this day of ,2012. BY: Authorized City Official

ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Parks, Recreation & Library DATE SUBMITTED: 3/2/12 PREPARED BY: Margery K. Cyr SUBJECT: Purchase of Furniture for New Library REFERENCE: New Library RELATED PROJECT: N/A REVIEWED BY: City Manager and Controller/Treasurer EXHIBITS: Furniture Specifications EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $309,000 AMOUNT BUDGETED: $703,000 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Parks, Recreation & Library CIP page 15 TIMETABLE: Order in March for delivery in July 2012 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council approval of the purchase of the furniture for the new Library in the amount of $309,000 from Corporate Interiors. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Ground was broken on the new Dover Public Library in April 2011. The Library is at 50% construction and on time for a June 2012 construction completion date. Included in the project budget is $703,000 for furniture and fixtures. There is lead time on the order and delivery necessary so that furniture may be delivered and installed to meet construction schedule and deadlines. The furniture and fixtures purchases are being coordinated with the construction and delivery dates. Furniture that could not be purchased through State contract will be bid and if applicable, presented to Council at a later date. In accordance with our purchasing policy, equipment purchases under $200,000 are not required to have Council approval, unless a sole source procurement, sole vendor or not low bid. Bids are required for purchased over $25,000 and staff oversees this process. Budget – Furniture & Fixtures $703,000 Shelving approved 2/27/11 $293,000 Furniture purchased through State contract $309,000 (as attached) Staff has reviewed and recommends approval of the furniture order from Corporate Interiors through the state contract which is per the cooperative purchasing policy (Section 3.5) in place in the City of Dover.

Quotation Page 1 of 48 Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL QUOTE TO: JESSICA DOUGHERTY SHIP TO: JESSICA DOUGHERTY HOLZMAN MOSS BOTTINO ARCHITECT HOLZMAN MOSS BOTTINO ARCHITECT 214 WEST 29TH STREET TOWER 214 WEST 29TH STREET TOWER 17TH FLOOR 17TH FLOOR New York, NY 10001 New York, NY 10001 P: 1.212.465.0808 X254 P: 1.212.465.0808 X254 F: 1.212.465.2226 F: 1.212.465.2226 Terms: NET 30 DAYS Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount QUOTES OF CORPORATE INTERIORS, INC. ARE VALID FOR 30 DAYS. APPROVAL: "By my signature below, I have reviewed all surface materials (i.e. paint, fabric, plastic, veneer, etc.) with my CI sales representative. I approve the selections as quoted." ALL PRICING ON THIS QUOTE IS BASED UPON THE QUANTITIES REQUESTED ON HOLZMAN MOSS DRAWINGS AND SPREADSHEET DATED 1/13/12. FINISHES ARE BASED UPON GROUP 1 FINISHES BEG Subsection 1ST FLOOR 1 1 9798BL SAFCO PR 132.68 132.68 AT YOUR DISPOSAL RECYCLING CENTER, 46"w x 16"d x 33"h, impact and moisture resistant polyethylene, three separate, 28 gallon bins under one lid, Decals are included Tag For: TR-01/RM 102-A 2 1 LNLECT2730 FIXTURES 865.08 865.08 Lectern, 27x30 E06 SATIN SILVER WOODGRAIN LAMINATES Woodgrain Laminates L12 WILD CHERRY LD Solid Urethane

Quotation Page 2 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount U05 WROUGHT IRON ~ Casters ~ Standard Modesty (same HPL as worksurface) Tag For: PO-01/107A-B 3 2 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 360.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/112 4 1 1961-6 GLOBAL I 285.00 285.00 ALERO-Medium Back Pneumatic Task chair w/arms - Fabric FINISHES ~03 GRADE 03 ~DRMA DRAMA D804 1-BLACK ARM GL A-(STD) HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE SSU FRAME/EDGE BK F-(STD) BLACK CASTER/KEYS (OPT) C1 C-(STD) 2" DUAL-WHL CASTOR - BLCK CHAIR BASES (OPT) ~ (STD) CYLINDER OPTION (OPT) ~ (STD) SEATING FOAM (OPT) ~ (STD) ARM WIDTH (OPT) ~ (STD) Tag For: CH-12/114 5 1 2243 GLOBAL I 184.00 184.00 DRAFTING STOOL KIT-W/ 10 gas cylinder. Chrome outer ring. Tag For: CH-12/114 6 6 383GA COMMUNITY 139.59 837.54 MELROSE ALL WOOD CHAIR, horizontal slat back, MWO MEDIUM WALNUT ON OAK Tag For: CH-04/114 7 1 LNSH3060CH/SM/LV FIXTURES 2,148.66 2,148.66 Teacher Station, 30x60, seated height, crank Adj, LH Small Cab Stg, RIGHT HAND LRG CAB ,

Quotation Page 3 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount HPLBP High Pressure Laminate Back Panel E016 SATIN SILVER WOODGRAIN LAMINATES Woodgrain Laminates L12 WILD CHERRY LD Solid Urethane U05 WROUGHT IRON M05 WROUGHT IRON ~ No Rack ~ Casters BP Black Pulls On Storage Tag For: DE-01/114 8 4 CUSTOM TERRAIN 3,008.35 12,033.40 CUSTOM DISPLAY TABLE AS PER DRAWING BD-01 PROVIDED BY HOLZMAN MOSS BOTTINO ARCHITECTURE. VENEER WITH CUSTOM FINISH TO MATCH COMMUNITY MEDIUM WALNUT ON OAK. Tag For: DT-01/114 9 6 TS31408 STEELCAS 957.60 5,745.60 Chair-Jenny, Lounge, Wood Arms ARMS :3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY UPHLSTRY:59DG GRADED IN PR. GRP. 7 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: OSCILLATE -3238 Color: MALLARD -401 Direction: VERTICAL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * LEG OPT *OPT:LEG OPTIONS WOOD WOOD LEGS LEGS LEGS WOOD VEN *LEGS:WOOD 3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: L-01A/114 10 5 TS31408 STEELCAS 982.11 4,910.55 Chair-Jenny, Lounge, Wood Arms ARMS :3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY UPHLSTRY:59DH GRADED IN PR. GRP. 8 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR

Quotation Page 4 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount Pattern: MAGLIA -3233 Color: KUMQUAT -701 Direction: VERTICAL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * LEG OPT *OPT:LEG OPTIONS WOOD WOOD LEGS LEGS LEGS WOOD VEN *LEGS:WOOD 3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: l-01B/114 11 10 TS31401 STEELCAS 673.17 6,731.70 Chair-Jenny,Armless UPHLSTRY:59DB GRADED IN PR. GRP. 2 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: LUDINGTON -3285 Color: EARTH -702 Direction: VERTICAL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * LEG OPT *OPT:LEG OPTIONS WOOD WOOD LEGS LEGS LEGS WOOD VEN *LEGS:WOOD 3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: L-02/114 12 1 OPAC-02A TERRAIN 1,584.60 1,584.60 CUSTOM UNIT AS PER DRAWING OPAC-02A PROVIDED BY HOLZMAN MOSS BOTTINO ARCHITURE. VENEER WITH CUSTOM FINISH TO MATCH COMMUNITY MEDIUM WALNUT ON OAK. Tag For: OP-02A/114 13 8 CYLINDER TABLE TERRAIN 251.18 2,009.44 18" DIAMETER x 18"H OVERALL, Wilsonart Laminate-7054-60 WILD CHERRY, 3"H BLACK PLINTH BASE Tag For: ST-01/114 14 4 820L-30RD CAROLINA 548.91 2,195.64 30" DIAM x 14.5H COCKTAIL TABLE WITH LAMINATE TOP. WILSONART 7054-60 WILD CHERRY Tag For: TA-02/114 15 3 JE42R-29MT COMMUNITY 517.94 1,553.82 JEFFERSON 42" DIAM x29H TABLE WITH TAPERED LEGS, ADA COMPLIANT

Quotation Page 5 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount MWO MEDIUM WALNUT ON OAK Tag For: TA-04/114 16 2 9798BL SAFCO PR 132.68 265.36 AT YOUR DISPOSAL RECYCLING CENTER, 46"w x 16"d x 33"h, impact and moisture resistant polyethylene, three separate, 28 gallon bins under one lid, Decals are included Tag For: TR-01/RM 114 17 1 1961-6 GLOBAL I 285.00 285.00 ALERO-Medium Back Pneumatic Task chair w/arms - Fabric FINISHES ~03 GRADE 03 ~DRMA DRAMA D804 1-BLACK ARM GL A-(STD) HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE SSU FRAME/EDGE BK F-(STD) BLACK CASTER/KEYS (OPT) C1 C-(STD) 2" DUAL-WHL CASTOR - BLCK CHAIR BASES (OPT) ~ (STD) CYLINDER OPTION (OPT) ~ (STD) SEATING FOAM (OPT) ~ (STD) ARM WIDTH (OPT) ~ (STD) Tag For: CH-12/115 18 1 2243 GLOBAL I 184.00 184.00 DRAFTING STOOL KIT-W/ 10 gas cylinder. Chrome outer ring. Tag For: CH-12/115 19 10 SG.AY.4L.15.6BK.7BK STELTER 73.14 731.40 VANERUM STELTER AIRLEY SHELL ON 4 LEG FRAME 15.5" HIGH BLACK SHELL WITH BLACK POWDER COATED FRAME FINISH, NYLON GLIDES. STANDARD VANERUM STELTER FINISHES Tag For: CH-07/115 20 10 SG.AY.4L.17.6BK.7BK STELTER 73.14 731.40 VANERUM STELTER AIRLEY SHELL ON 4 LEG FRAME 17.5"HIGH BLACK SHELL WITH BLACK POWDER COATED FRAME FINISH, NYLON GLIDES, STANDARD VANERUM STELTER

Quotation Page 6 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount FINISHES Tag For: CH-08/115 21 1 LNSH3060CH/SM/LV FIXTURES 2,148.66 2,148.66 Teacher Station, 30x60, seated height, crank Adj, LH Small Cab Stg, RIGHT HAND LRG CAB , HPLBP High Pressure Laminate Back Panel E06 SATIN SILVER WOODGRAIN LAMINATES Woodgrain Laminates L14 ZEBRANO LD Solid Urethane U05 WROUGHT IRON M05 WROUGHT IRON ~ No Rack ~ Casters BP Black Pulls On Storage Tag For: DE-01/115 22 1 OPAC-02B TERRAIN 1,741.73 1,741.73 CUSTOM UNIT AS PER DRAWING OPAC-02B PROVIDED BY HOLZMAN MOSS BOTTINO ARCHITURE. VENEER WITH CUSTOM FINISH TO MATCH COMMUNITY NATURAL MAPLE ON BEECH. INSET: MARMOLEUM REAL COLOR: 3173 VAN GOGH Tag For: OP-02B/115 23 1 OPAC-02C TERRAIN 2,850.00 2,850.00 CUSTOM UNIT AS PER DRAWING OPAC-02C PROVIDED BY HOLZMAN MOSS BOTTINO ARCHITURE. VENEER WITH CUSTOM FINISH TO MATCH COMMUNITY NATURAL MAPLE ON BEECH. INSET: MARMOLEUM REAL COLOR: 3173 VAN GOGH Tag For: OP-02C/115 24 1 ALT3000 AGATI 8,391.08 8,391.08 ALTRA FORMA SET C- 19 PIECE SET

Quotation Page 7 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount Tag For: SG-02/115 25 6 CYLINDER TABLE TERRAIN 251.18 1,507.08 18" DIAMETER x 18"H OVERALL, Wilsonart Laminate- 9011-58 FORMICA ZEBRANO 3"H BLACK PLINTH BASE Tag For: ST-01/115 26 6 TB.MIG.R.7236.7CM STELTER 596.25 3,577.50 72x30 EARLY CHILDHOOD COMPUTER TABLE, ADJ HGT MAPLE 2MP LAMINATE SMOKE STONE 9SS EDGE BAND Tag For: TA-05A/115 27 2 TB,MIG.R.3630.7CM STELTER 454.21 908.42 MIRAGE 36"W X 30"D TABLE, ADJ HGT MAPLE 2MP LAMINATE SMOKE STONE 9SS EDGE BAND Tag For: TA-05B/115 28 2 9798BL SAFCO PR 132.68 265.36 AT YOUR DISPOSAL RECYCLING CENTER, 46"w x 16"d x 33"h, impact and moisture resistant polyethylene, three separate, 28 gallon bins under one lid, Decals are included Tag For: TR-01/RM 115 29 33 SG.AY.4L.15.6BK.7BK STELTER 73.14 2,413.62 VANERUM STELTER AIRLEY SHELL ON 4 LEG FRAME 15.5" HIGH BLACK SHELL WITH BLACK POWDER COATED FRAME FINISH, NYLON GLIDES. STANDARD VANERUM STELTER FINISHES Tag For: CH-07/116 30 33 SG.AY.4L.17.6BK.7BK STELTER 73.14 2,413.62 VANERUM STELTER AIRLEY SHELL ON 4 LEG FRAME 17.5"HIGH BLACK SHELL WITH BLACK POWDER COATED FRAME FINISH, NYLON GLIDES, STANDARD VANERUM STELTER FINISHES Tag For: CH-08/116 31 2 KTV68 KRUEGER 301.60 603.20 DOLLY, COLOR: BE, BASE OPTION: SC Tag For: DO-01/116

Quotation Page 8 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount 32 11 S11475185 KRUEGER 387.44 4,261.84 30X72 table Special Items: • LEGS ARE FIXED HEIGHT AT 26" OVERALL TABLE HEIGHT STANDARD FINISHES Tag For: TA-10/116 33 1 SET UP FEE KRUEGER 75.00 75.00 ADDITIONAL 2 WEEK LEAD TIME REQUIRED 34 1 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 180.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/117 35 1 TS5HLEL2466 STEELCAS 434.34 434.34 Shell-Extended Corner,Curved Front, Left Hand,High-Pressure Laminate, 24x66x36 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OF-117/117 36 1 TS5HLDS2472 STEELCAS 306.66 306.66 Shell-Desk,High-Pressure Laminate,24x72 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * EP OPT *OPT:END PANEL OPTIONS CALH FRH CLEAR ACCESS LH, FULL RH - EN Tag For: OF-117/117 37 1 TS5LBBF23U STEELCAS 285.00 285.00 Pedestal-Underworksurface, Box/Box/File, 23dx27h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL

Quotation Page 9 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount Tag For: OF-117/117 38 1 TSAEGROM STEELCAS 26.79 26.79 Grommets-Package/10 Tag For: OF-117/117 39 2 TS5HL2436F2 STEELCAS 506.16 1,012.32 File-Freestanding Lateral, High-Pressure Laminate,24dx28 1/2hx36w BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-117/117 40 2 TS5TLSB3637 STEELCAS 212.61 425.22 Bookcase-Stacking, 36w37 1/2h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL TOP-SURF:26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL Tag For: OF-117/117 41 1 TS30104 STEELCAS 180.69 180.69 Chair-a la carte, Round Back, Guest, Leg Frame UPHLSTRY:5A21 RUST Tag For: L-03/117 42 3 TSAFHC2448M STEELCAS 591.09 1,773.27 Desk-Corner, Curved, Half-Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x48 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER Tag For: OF-119/119 43 1 TSAFHD2472M STEELCAS 499.89 499.89 Desk Shell-Half Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x72 BASIC :7225 SAND

Quotation Page 10 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER Tag For: OF-119/119 44 1 TSAFHE2460M STEELCAS 375.63 375.63 Return-Half Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x60 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER Tag For: OF-119/119 45 2 TSAFHR2448F STEELCAS 474.24 948.48 Return-Pedestal, Full Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x48 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-119/119 46 1 TSAFHR2448M STEELCAS 462.27 462.27 Return-Pedestal, Half Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x48 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-119/119 47 1 TSAWHR2448 STEELCAS 137.94 137.94 Worksurface-Straight, High Pressure Laminate, 24x48 EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER Tag For: OF-119/119 48 1 TS2F236UL STEELCAS 414.96 414.96 Lateral File-Two Drawer, Under Worksurface, 36"W

Quotation Page 11 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount BASIC :7225 SAND KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-119 49 4 TS5HL2436F2 STEELCAS 506.16 2,024.64 File-Freestanding Lateral, High-Pressure Laminate,24dx28 1/2hx36w BASIC :2L85 DUNE EDGE :6654 SAND FRONT :2L85 DUNE LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME TOP-SURF:2885 DUNE OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-119/119 50 4 TS5TLSB3637 STEELCAS 212.61 850.44 Bookcase-Stacking, 36w37 1/2h BASIC :2L85 DUNE TOP-SURF:2L85 DUNE Tag For: OF-119/119 51 1 TSAEGROM STEELCAS 26.79 26.79 Grommets-Package/10 Tag For: OF-119/119 52 2 UFB STEELCAS 12.54 25.08 Flush Mount Bracket Tag For: OF-119/119 53 3 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 540.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/119 54 2 EFL3818868S MAYLINE 433.78 867.56 4-POST METAL SHELVING 36Wx18Dx86H, STARTER UNIT Tag For: BK-12/120

Quotation Page 12 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount 55 6 EFO3618868A MAYLINE 363.86 2,183.16 4-POST METAL SHELVING, 36Wx18Dx85H, ADDER UNIT Tag For: BK-12/120 56 8 LANCASTER KRUEGER 264.48 2,115.84 lancaster chair without tablet arm, no power or data grade 1 pallas fabric flexing muscles in navy 27.185.104 Tag For: CH-05/121A 57 1 KI FREIGHT KRUEGER 450.00 450.00 FOR (8) LANCASTER CHAIRS 58 1 INSTALLATION KRUEGER 450.00 450.00 FOR (9) LANCASTER AUDITORIUM SEATS 59 2 EFL3818868S MAYLINE 433.78 867.56 4-POST METAL SHELVING 36Wx18Dx86H, STARTER UNIT Tag For: BK-12/121-B 60 2 TS31401 STEELCAS 673.17 1,346.34 Chair-Jenny,Armless UPHLSTRY:59DB GRADED IN PR. GRP. 2 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: LUDINGTON -3285 Color: EARTH -702 Direction: HORIZONTAL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * LEG OPT *OPT:LEG OPTIONS WOOD WOOD LEGS LEGS LEGS WOOD VEN *LEGS:WOOD 3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: L-02/122 61 2 CYLINDER TABLE TERRAIN 251.18 502.36 18" DIAMETER x 18"H OVERALL, Wilsonart Laminate- 7054-60 WILD CHERRY 3"H BLACK PLINTH BASE Tag For: ST-01/122 62 2 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 360.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/128

Quotation Page 13 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount 63 2 TSAFHC2448M STEELCAS 591.09 1,182.18 Desk-Corner, Curved, Half-Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x48 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * SUPT OPT *OPT:SUPPORT OPTIONS 2 CA 2 CLEAR ACCESS END PANELS Tag For: DE-02/RM 128 64 1 TSAFHN2472M STEELCAS 626.43 626.43 Desk-Single Pedestal, Half-Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x72 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL PED OPT *OPT:PEDESTAL OPTIONS BBF PED BOX/BOX/FILE PED Tag For: DE-02/RM 128 65 2 TSAFHE2442M STEELCAS 329.46 658.92 Return-Half Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x42 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER Tag For: DE-02/RM 128 66 2 TS2PBBF22U STEELCAS 235.98 471.96 Pedestal-Box/Box/File, Under Worksurface, 22"D BASIC :7225 SAND KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: DE-02/RM 128

Quotation Page 14 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount 67 2 TSAFHR2448M STEELCAS 462.27 924.54 Return-Pedestal, Half Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x48 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: DE-02/RM 128 68 1 TSAEGROM STEELCAS 26.79 26.79 Grommets-Package/10 Tag For: DE-02/RM 128 69 1 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 180.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/130 70 1 TS5HLEL2466 STEELCAS 434.34 434.34 Shell-Extended Corner,Curved Front, Left Hand,High-Pressure Laminate, 24x66x36 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OF-130/RM 130 71 1 TS5HLDS2472 STEELCAS 306.66 306.66 Shell-Desk,High-Pressure Laminate,24x72 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * EP OPT *OPT:END PANEL OPTIONS CALH FRH CLEAR ACCESS LH, FULL RH - EN Tag For: OF-130/RM 130 72 1 TS5LBBF23U STEELCAS 285.00 285.00 Pedestal-Underworksurface, Box/Box/File, 23dx27h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL

Quotation Page 15 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-130/RM 130 73 2 TS5HL2436F2 STEELCAS 506.16 1,012.32 File-Freestanding Lateral, High-Pressure Laminate,24dx28 1/2hx36w BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-130/RM 130 74 2 TS5TLSB3637 STEELCAS 212.61 425.22 Bookcase-Stacking, 36w37 1/2h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL TOP-SURF:26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL Tag For: OF-130/RM 130 75 1 TS30104 STEELCAS 180.69 180.69 Chair-a la carte, Round Back, Guest, Leg Frame UPHLSTRY:5A21 RUST Tag For: L-03/130 76 2 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 360.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/130A 77 2 TSAFHC2448M STEELCAS 591.09 1,182.18 Desk-Corner, Curved, Half-Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x48

Quotation Page 16 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * SUPT OPT *OPT:SUPPORT OPTIONS 2 CA 2 CLEAR ACCESS END PANELS Tag For: OF-131-A/131-A 78 1 TSAFHN2472M STEELCAS 626.43 626.43 Desk-Single Pedestal, Half-Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x72 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL PED OPT *OPT:PEDESTAL OPTIONS BBF PED BOX/BOX/FILE PED Tag For: OF-131-A/131-A 79 2 TSAFHE2442M STEELCAS 329.46 658.92 Return-Half Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x42 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER Tag For: OF-131-A/131-A 80 2 TS2PBBF22U STEELCAS 235.98 471.96 Pedestal-Box/Box/File, Under Worksurface, 22"D BASIC :7225 SAND KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-131-A/131-A 81 2 TSAFHR2448M STEELCAS 462.27 924.54 Return-Pedestal, Half Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x48 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM

Quotation Page 17 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-131-A/131-A 82 1 TSAEGROM STEELCAS 26.79 26.79 Grommets-Package/10 Tag For: OF-131-A/131-A 83 1 CUSTOM COUNTER TERRAIN 1,748.00 1,748.00 24" DEEP x 180" WIDE x 40" HIGH, TOP: STEELCASE LAMINATE 2854 VELLUM FIBER WITH CREAM EDGE. SUPPORTS & MODESTY PANEL: STEELCASE LAMINATE 2L85 DUNE OR WILSONART MATCH Tag For: OF-211 84 1 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 180.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/132 85 1 TS5HLCS2442 STEELCAS 359.10 359.10 Shell-Corner,High-Pressure Laminate, 24x42 BASIC :267L MARBLED CHERRY V2 LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OF-132/132 86 1 TS5HLDS2466 STEELCAS 296.97 296.97 Shell-Desk,High-Pressure Laminate,24x66 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * EP OPT *OPT:END PANEL OPTIONS CALH FRH CLEAR ACCESS LH, FULL RH - EN Tag For: OF-132/132 87 1 TS5HLDS2472 STEELCAS 306.66 306.66 Shell-Desk,High-Pressure Laminate,24x72 BASIC :262L MARBLED MAPLE LPL EDGE :6676 MARBLED MAPLE

Quotation Page 18 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount TOP-SURF:2612 MARBLED MAPLE OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * EP OPT *OPT:END PANEL OPTIONS CARH FLH CLEAR ACCESS RH, FULL LH - EN Tag For: OF-132/132 88 1 TS5LBBF23U STEELCAS 285.00 285.00 Pedestal-Underworksurface, Box/Box/File, 23dx27h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-132/132 89 1 TS5L2436UL STEELCAS 435.48 435.48 File-Underworksurface Lateral, 22dx27hx36w BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-132/132 90 1 TS5TLSB3637 STEELCAS 212.61 212.61 Bookcase-Stacking, 36w37 1/2h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL TOP-SURF:26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL Tag For: OF-132/132 91 1 TSAEGROM STEELCAS 26.79 26.79 Grommets-Package/10 Tag For: OF-132/132

Quotation Page 19 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount 92 1 TS30104 STEELCAS 180.69 180.69 Chair-a la carte, Round Back, Guest, Leg Frame UPHLSTRY:5A21 RUST Tag For: L-03/132 93 1 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 180.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/133 94 1 1961-6 GLOBAL I 285.00 285.00 ALERO-Medium Back Pneumatic Task chair w/arms - Fabric FINISHES ~03 GRADE 03 ~DRMA DRAMA D804 1-BLACK ARM GL A-(STD) HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE SSU FRAME/EDGE BK F-(STD) BLACK CASTER/KEYS (OPT) C1 C-(STD) 2" DUAL-WHL CASTOR - BLCK CHAIR BASES (OPT) ~ (STD) CYLINDER OPTION (OPT) ~ (STD) SEATING FOAM (OPT) ~ (STD) ARM WIDTH (OPT) ~ (STD) Tag For: CH-12/133 95 1 2243 GLOBAL I 184.00 184.00 DRAFTING STOOL KIT-W/ 10 gas cylinder. Chrome outer ring. Tag For: CH-12/133 Subsection Sub Total 110,651.38 DELAWARE - NON TAXABLE 0.00 Subsection Total 110,651.38 END Subsection BEG Subsection 2ND FLOOR 96 12 383GA COMMUNITY 139.59 1,675.08 MELROSE ALL WOOD CHAIR, horizontal slat back, MWO MEDIUM WALNUT ON OAK

Quotation Page 20 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount Tag For: CH-04/201 97 32 TS30805W STEELCAS 271.89 8,700.48 Chair-Crew, Guest, Armless, Wood Back, Glides BACK :3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY FRAME :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC SEAT :59DB GRADED IN PR. GRP. 2 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: LUDINGTON -3285 Color: EARTH -702 Direction: HORIZONTAL Tag For: CH-06/201 98 8 TS31408 STEELCAS 957.60 7,660.80 Chair-Jenny, Lounge, Wood Arms ARMS :3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY UPHLSTRY:59DG GRADED IN PR. GRP. 7 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: OSCILLATE -3238 Color: MALLARD -401 Direction: VERTICAL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * LEG OPT *OPT:LEG OPTIONS WOOD WOOD LEGS LEGS LEGS WOOD VEN *LEGS:WOOD 3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: L-06/201 99 4 CYLINDER TABLE TERRAIN 251.18 1,004.72 18" DIAMETER x 18"H OVERALL, Wilsonart Laminate-7054-60 WILD CHERRY 3"H BLACK PLINTH BASE Tag For: ST-01/201 100 6 JE42R-29MT COMMUNITY 517.94 3,107.64 JEFFERSON 42" DIAM x29H TABLE WITH TAPERED LEGS, ADA COMPLIANT MWO MEDIUM WALNUT ON OAK Tag For: TA-04/201 101 4 FMBDS2472 STEELCAS 1,592.01 6,368.04 BASE-DUAL SIDED, STRAIGHT,24X72 BASIC :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * TOP OPT *OPT:TOP SELECTION VEN TOP VENEER TOP TOP-SURF TOP SURFACE

Quotation Page 21 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount WOOD *TOP-SURF:WOOD 3402 FC/OP CLEAR CHERRY (AGED) Tag For: TA-11/201 102 4 FMEDS2472 STEELCAS 1,375.98 5,503.92 EXTENSION-DUAL SIDED, STRAIGHT,24X72 BASIC :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * TOP OPT *OPT:TOP SELECTION VEN TOP VENEER TOP TOP-SURF TOP SURFACE WOOD *TOP-SURF:WOOD 3402 FC/OP CLEAR CHERRY (AGED) Tag For: TA-11/201 103 4 FMVC STEELCAS 83.22 332.88 Riser-Vertebral Cable Tag For: TA-11/201 104 4 FMVI12H STEELCAS 123.12 492.48 Power Infeed-Hardwire to Modular, 12 Feet OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 3+1 Tag For: TA-11/201 105 4 FMVH63 STEELCAS 75.81 303.24 Harness-Modular, 63L OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 3+1 Tag For: TA-11/201 106 8 FMVPBS STEELCAS 91.20 729.60 Power Block-Standard Capacity OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 3+1 Tag For: TA-11/201 107 16 FMVPS STEELCAS 112.86 1,805.76 Power Strip-Power Strip with Cord and Rail Attachment Bracket Tag For: TA-11/201 108 8 FMVRD STEELCAS 23.94 191.52 Receptacle-Duplex

Quotation Page 22 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 PWR 3+1 POWER OPTIONS LINE 4 LINE 4 AMPERAGE *OPT:AMPERAGE OPTIONS 15 AMP 15 AMP GROUND *OPT:GROUND TYPE OPTIONS ISOLATED ISOLATED Tag For: TA-11/201 109 8 FMVRD STEELCAS 17.10 136.80 Receptacle-Duplex OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 PWR 3+1 POWER OPTIONS LINE 1 LINE 1 AMPERAGE *OPT:AMPERAGE OPTIONS 15 AMP 15 AMP GROUND *OPT:GROUND TYPE OPTIONS SYSTEM SYSTEM Tag For: TA-11/201 110 16 DSLEDR DETAILS 163.02 2,608.32 Task Light-Soto, LED, Rail Mount BASIC :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC Tag For: TA-11/201 111 1 1961-6 GLOBAL I 285.00 285.00 ALERO-Medium Back Pneumatic Task chair w/arms - Fabric FINISHES ~03 GRADE 03 ~DRMA DRAMA D804 1-BLACK ARM GL A-(STD) HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE SSU FRAME/EDGE BK F-(STD) BLACK CASTER/KEYS (OPT) C1 C-(STD) 2" DUAL-WHL CASTOR - BLCK CHAIR BASES (OPT) ~ (STD) CYLINDER OPTION (OPT) ~ (STD) SEATING FOAM (OPT) ~ (STD) ARM WIDTH (OPT) ~ (STD) Tag For: CH-12/202 112 1 2243 GLOBAL I 184.00 184.00 DRAFTING STOOL KIT-W/ 10 gas

Quotation Page 23 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount cylinder. Chrome outer ring. Tag For: CH-12/202 113 28 383GA COMMUNITY 139.59 3,908.52 MELROSE ALL WOOD CHAIR, horizontal slat back, MWO MEDIUM WALNUT ON OAK Tag For: CH-04/202 114 22 TS30805W STEELCAS 271.89 5,981.58 Chair-Crew, Guest, Armless, Wood Back, Glides BACK :3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY FRAME :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC SEAT :59DB GRADED IN PR. GRP. 2 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: LUDINGTON -3285 Color: EARTH -702 Direction: HORIZONTAL Tag For: CH-06/202 115 1 LNSH3060CH/SM/LV FIXTURES 2,148.66 2,148.66 Teacher Station, 30x60, seated height, crank Adj, LH Small Cab Stg, RIGHT HAND LRG CAB , HPLBP High Pressure Laminate Back Panel E06 SATIN SILVER WOODGRAIN LAMINATES Woodgrain Laminates L12 WILD CHERRY LD Solid Urethane U05 WROUGHT IRON M05 WROUGHT IRON ~ No Rack ~ Casters BP Black Pulls On Storage Tag For: DE-01/202 116 6 TS31408 STEELCAS 957.60 5,745.60 Chair-Jenny, Lounge, Wood Arms ARMS :3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY UPHLSTRY:59DG GRADED IN PR. GRP. 7

Quotation Page 24 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: OSCILLATE -3238 Color: MALLARD -401 Direction: VERTICAL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * LEG OPT *OPT:LEG OPTIONS WOOD WOOD LEGS LEGS LEGS WOOD VEN *LEGS:WOOD 3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: L-01A/202 117 5 TS31408 STEELCAS 982.11 4,910.55 Chair-Jenny, Lounge, Wood Arms ARMS :3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY UPHLSTRY:59DH GRADED IN PR. GRP. 8 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: MAGLIA -3233 Color: KUMQUAT -701 Direction: VERTICAL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * LEG OPT *OPT:LEG OPTIONS WOOD WOOD LEGS LEGS LEGS WOOD VEN *LEGS:WOOD 3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: l-01B/202 118 12 TS31401 STEELCAS 673.17 8,078.04 Chair-Jenny,Armless UPHLSTRY:59DB GRADED IN PR. GRP. 2 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: LUDINGTON -3285 Color: EARTH -702 Direction: HORIZONTAL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * LEG OPT *OPT:LEG OPTIONS WOOD WOOD LEGS LEGS LEGS WOOD VEN *LEGS:WOOD 3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: L-02/202 119 4 OPAC-01 TERRAIN 2,216.65 8,866.60 CUSTOM UNIT AS PER DRAWING OPAC-01 PROVIDED BY HOLZMAN MOSS BOTTINO ARCHITURE.

Quotation Page 25 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount VENEER WITH CUSTOM FINISH TO MATCH COMMUNITY MEDIUM WALNUT ON OAK. Tag For: OP-01/202 120 13 CYLINDER TABLE TERRAIN 251.18 3,265.34 18" DIAMETER x 18"H OVERALL, Wilsonart Laminate- 7054-60 WILD CHERRY 3"H BLACK PLINTH BASE Tag For: ST-01/202 121 1 FMBDS3096 STEELCAS 2,789.01 2,789.01 BASE-DUAL SIDED, STRAIGHT,30X96 BASIC :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * TOP OPT *OPT:TOP SELECTION VEN TOP VENEER TOP TOP-SURF TOP SURFACE WOOD *TOP-SURF:WOOD 3402 FC/OP CLEAR CHERRY (AGED) LEG OPT *OPT:LEG SELECTION STD LEG STD:STANDARD POST LEG TRAY OPT *OPT:TRAY SELECTION UPR/LOWR UPPER AND LOWER TRAY Tag For: TA-03A/202 122 1 FMEDS3048 STEELCAS 1,366.29 1,366.29 EXTENSION-DUAL SIDED, STRAIGHT,30X48 BASIC :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * TOP OPT *OPT:TOP SELECTION VEN TOP VENEER TOP TOP-SURF TOP SURFACE WOOD *TOP-SURF:WOOD 3402 FC/OP CLEAR CHERRY (AGED) TRAY OPT *OPT:TRAY SELECTION UPR/LOWR UPPER AND LOWER TRAY Tag For: TA-03A/202 123 1 FMCS2460 STEELCAS 557.46 557.46 End Counter-Straight, 24X60 OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * TOP OPT *OPT:TOP SELECTION VEN TOP VENEER TOP TOP-SURF TOP SURFACE WOOD *TOP-SURF:WOOD 3402 FC/OP CLEAR CHERRY (AGED) Tag For: TA-03A/202 124 3 FMSC4819 STEELCAS 247.95 743.85

Quotation Page 26 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount Screen-Centered, 19X48 OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * SURF OPT *OPT:SURFACE OPTIONS FABRIC FABRIC SURFACE SURFACE SURFACE BUZZ 2 *SURFACE:BUZZ 2 5F15 STONE Tag For: TA-03A/202 125 1 FMVC STEELCAS 83.22 83.22 Riser-Vertebral Cable Tag For: TA-03A/202 126 1 FMVI12H STEELCAS 123.12 123.12 Power Infeed-Hardwire to Modular, 12 Feet OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 3+1 Tag For: TA-03A/202 127 2 FMVH30 STEELCAS 59.28 118.56 Harness-Modular, 30L OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 3+1 Tag For: TA-03A/202 128 3 FMVPBH STEELCAS 193.23 579.69 Power Block-High Capacity, Accepts 1-4 Receptacles per Side OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 3+1 Tag For: TA-03A/202 129 6 FMVRD STEELCAS 23.94 143.64 Receptacle-Duplex OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 PWR 3+1 POWER OPTIONS LINE 4 LINE 4 AMPERAGE *OPT:AMPERAGE OPTIONS 15 AMP 15 AMP GROUND *OPT:GROUND TYPE OPTIONS ISOLATED ISOLATED Tag For: TA-03A/202 130 6 FMVRD STEELCAS 17.10 102.60 Receptacle-Duplex OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * *

Quotation Page 27 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 PWR 3+1 POWER OPTIONS LINE 1 LINE 1 AMPERAGE *OPT:AMPERAGE OPTIONS 15 AMP 15 AMP GROUND *OPT:GROUND TYPE OPTIONS SYSTEM SYSTEM Tag For: TA-03A/202 131 6 DSLEDR DETAILS 163.02 978.12 Task Light-Soto, LED, Rail Mount BASIC :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC Tag For: TA-03A/202 132 2 FMBDS3096 STEELCAS 2,789.01 5,578.02 BASE-DUAL SIDED, STRAIGHT,30X96 BASIC :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * TOP OPT *OPT:TOP SELECTION VEN TOP VENEER TOP TOP-SURF TOP SURFACE WOOD *TOP-SURF:WOOD 3402 FC/OP CLEAR CHERRY (AGED) LEG OPT *OPT:LEG SELECTION STD LEG STD:STANDARD POST LEG TRAY OPT *OPT:TRAY SELECTION UPR/LOWR UPPER AND LOWER TRAY Tag For: TA-03B/202 133 2 FMEDS3096 STEELCAS 2,528.52 5,057.04 EXTENSION-DUAL SIDED, STRAIGHT,30X96 BASIC :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * TOP OPT *OPT:TOP SELECTION VEN TOP VENEER TOP TOP-SURF TOP SURFACE WOOD *TOP-SURF:WOOD 3402 FC/OP CLEAR CHERRY (AGED) TRAY OPT *OPT:TRAY SELECTION UPR/LOWR UPPER AND LOWER TRAY Tag For: TA-03B/202 134 1 FMAS STEELCAS 11.97 11.97 Screen-Aligner Tag For: TA-03B/202 135 8 FMSC4819 STEELCAS 247.95 1,983.60 Screen-Centered, 19X48 OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * *

Quotation Page 28 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount SURF OPT *OPT:SURFACE OPTIONS FABRIC FABRIC SURFACE SURFACE SURFACE BUZZ 2 *SURFACE:BUZZ 2 5F15 STONE Tag For: TA-03B/202 136 2 FMVC STEELCAS 83.22 166.44 Riser-Vertebral Cable Tag For: TA-03B/202 137 2 FMVI12H STEELCAS 123.12 246.24 Power Infeed-Hardwire to Modular, 12 Feet OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 3+1 Tag For: TA-03B/202 138 2 FMVF STEELCAS 18.24 36.48 Filler Package-Data and Power Tag For: TA-03B/202 139 6 FMVH30 STEELCAS 59.28 355.68 Harness-Modular, 30L OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 3+1 Tag For: TA-03B/202 140 8 FMVPBH STEELCAS 193.23 1,545.84 Power Block-High Capacity, Accepts 1-4 Receptacles per Side OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 3+1 Tag For: TA-03B/202 141 16 FMVRD STEELCAS 23.94 383.04 Receptacle-Duplex OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 PWR 3+1 POWER OPTIONS LINE 4 LINE 4 AMPERAGE *OPT:AMPERAGE OPTIONS 15 AMP 15 AMP GROUND *OPT:GROUND TYPE OPTIONS ISOLATED ISOLATED Tag For: TA-03B/202

Quotation Page 29 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount 142 16 FMVRD STEELCAS 17.10 273.60 Receptacle-Duplex OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PWR OPT *OPT:POWER SCHEMATIC 3+1 PWR 3+1 POWER OPTIONS LINE 4 LINE 4 AMPERAGE *OPT:AMPERAGE OPTIONS 15 AMP 15 AMP GROUND *OPT:GROUND TYPE OPTIONS SYSTEM SYSTEM Tag For: TA-03B/202 143 6 DSLEDR DETAILS 163.02 978.12 Task Light-Soto, LED, Rail Mount BASIC :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC Tag For: TA-03B/202 144 12 JE42R-29MT COMMUNITY 517.94 6,215.28 JEFFERSON 42" DIAM x29H TABLE WITH TAPERED LEGS, ADA COMPLIANT MWO MEDIUM WALNUT ON OAK Tag For: TA-04/202 145 1 JE3660-27 COMMUNITY 487.86 487.86 JEFFERSON SERIES TAPERED LEG TABLE, 36Dx60W MWO MEDIUM WALNUT ON OAK Tag For: TA-12/202 146 4 9798BL SAFCO PR 132.68 530.72 AT YOUR DISPOSAL RECYCLING CENTER, 46"w x 16"d x 33"h, impact and moisture resistant polyethylene, three separate, 28 gallon bins under one lid, Decals are included Tag For: TR-01/RM 202 147 6 TS31401 STEELCAS 673.17 4,039.02 Chair-Jenny,Armless UPHLSTRY:59DB GRADED IN PR. GRP. 2 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: LUDINGTON -3285 Color: EARTH -702 Direction: HORIZONTAL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * LEG OPT *OPT:LEG OPTIONS WOOD WOOD LEGS LEGS LEGS WOOD VEN *LEGS:WOOD 3412 FC/OP NATURAL

Quotation Page 30 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount CHERRY Tag For: L-02/203 148 5 CYLINDER TABLE TERRAIN 251.18 1,255.90 18" DIAMETER x 18"H OVERALL, Wilsonart Laminate- 7054-60 WILD CHERRY 3"H BLACK PLINTH BASE Tag For: ST-01/203 149 4 TS30805W STEELCAS 271.89 1,087.56 Chair-Crew, Guest, Armless, Wood Back, Glides BACK :3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY FRAME :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC SEAT :59DB GRADED IN PR. GRP. 2 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: LUDINGTON -3285 Color: EARTH -702 Direction: HORIZONTAL Tag For: CH-06/207 150 1 9798BL SAFCO PR 132.68 132.68 AT YOUR DISPOSAL RECYCLING CENTER, 46"w x 16"d x 33"h, impact and moisture resistant polyethylene, three separate, 28 gallon bins under one lid, Decals are included Tag For: TR-01/RM 208 151 1 EFL3818868S MAYLINE 433.78 433.78 4-POST METAL SHELVING 36Wx18Dx86H, STARTER UNIT Tag For: BK-12/209 152 3 EFO3618868A MAYLINE 363.86 1,091.58 4-POST METAL SHELVING, 36Wx18Dx85H, ADDER UNIT Tag For: BK-12/209 153 10 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 1,800.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/210 154 1 TS5ATRE4120 STEELCAS 469.11 469.11 Table Top-Rectangular, 48x120 TOP-SURF:26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * *

Quotation Page 31 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount EDGE *OPT:EDGE PROFILE OPTIONS FLAT STD:FLAT EDGE PROFILE Tag For: TA-13/210 155 1 TS5ATBP120 STEELCAS 326.61 326.61 Table Base-Panel, 24x82-1/2x28 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL Tag For: TA-13/210 156 2 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 360.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/211 157 2 TSAFHC2448M STEELCAS 591.09 1,182.18 Desk-Corner, Curved, Half-Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x48 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * SUPT OPT *OPT:SUPPORT OPTIONS 2 CA 2 CLEAR ACCESS END PANELS Tag For: OF-211 158 1 TSAFHN2472M STEELCAS 626.43 626.43 Desk-Single Pedestal, Half-Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x72 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL PED OPT *OPT:PEDESTAL OPTIONS BBF PED BOX/BOX/FILE PED Tag For: OF-211 159 2 TSAFHE2442M STEELCAS 329.46 658.92 Return-Half Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x42 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER

Quotation Page 32 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount Tag For: OF-211 160 2 TS2PBBF22U STEELCAS 235.98 471.96 Pedestal-Box/Box/File, Under Worksurface, 22"D BASIC :7225 SAND KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-211 161 2 TSAFHR2448M STEELCAS 462.27 924.54 Return-Pedestal, Half Height Modesty Panel, High Pressure Laminate, 24x48 BASIC :7225 SAND EDGE :6631 CREAM TOP-SURF:2854 VELLUM FIBER KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-211 162 1 TSAEGROM STEELCAS 26.79 26.79 Grommets-Package/10 Tag For: OF-211 163 1 CUSTOM COUNTER TERRAIN 2,325.60 2,325.60 24" DEEP x 228" WIDE x 29" HIGH, TOP: STEELCASE LAMINATE 2854 VELLUM FIBER WITH CREAM EDGE. SUPPORTS & MODESTY PANEL: STEELCASE LAMINATE 2L85 DUNE OR WILSONART MATCH Tag For: OF-211 164 1 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 180.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/212 165 1 TS30104 STEELCAS 180.69 180.69 Chair-a la carte, Round Back, Guest, Leg Frame UPHLSTRY:5A21 RUST

Quotation Page 33 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount Tag For: L-03/212 166 1 TS5HLMD3672 STEELCAS 467.40 467.40 Peninsula-D Shape, Modesty Panel, High-Pressure Laminate, 36x72 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL COLUMN :7207 BLACK EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OF-212 167 1 TS5HLUL2442 STEELCAS 222.87 222.87 Shell-Return,Left Hand, High-Pressure Laminate,24x42 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OF-212 168 1 TS5HLBBF22M STEELCAS 408.12 408.12 Pedestal-Mobile, Box/Box/File, High-Pressure Laminate,22dx27h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-212 169 1 TSAEGROM STEELCAS 26.79 26.79 Grommets-Package/10 Tag For: OF-212 170 1 RLF18365F STEELCAS 1,085.85 1,085.85 Lateral File-1 Lift Up Door/Fixed Shelf, 4 Drawer, Flush Front, 18x36x65-1/2 BASIC :7238 FIELDSTONE LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME KEYS :SK PLUG OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * WGHT PKG *OPT:COUNTERWEIGHT PKG

Quotation Page 34 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount WEIGHT COUNTERWEIGHT PKG Tag For: OF-212 171 2 TS5TLBK3666 STEELCAS 293.55 587.10 Bookcase-36wx66h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL TOP-SURF:26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL Tag For: OF-212 172 1 EFL3818868S MAYLINE 433.78 433.78 4-POST METAL SHELVING 36Wx18Dx86H, STARTER UNIT Tag For: BK-12/213 173 1 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 180.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/214 174 1 TS5HLMD3672 STEELCAS 476.52 476.52 Peninsula-D Shape, Modesty Panel, High-Pressure Laminate, 36x72 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL COLUMN :4750 CHAMPAGNE METALLIC EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OF-214 175 1 TS5HLRR2448 STEELCAS 458.85 458.85 Return-Right Hand,High-Pressure Laminate,24x48 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PED OPT *OPT:SINGLE PEDESTAL OPTIONS BBF PED BOX-BOX-FILE PEDESTAL PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-214

Quotation Page 35 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount 176 2 TS5TLBK3666 STEELCAS 293.55 587.10 Bookcase-36wx66h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL TOP-SURF:26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL Tag For: OF-214 177 1 TS30104 STEELCAS 180.69 180.69 Chair-a la carte, Round Back, Guest, Leg Frame UPHLSTRY:5A21 RUST Tag For: L-03/214 178 6 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 1,080.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/216 179 1 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 180.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/217 180 1 TS5HLMD3072 STEELCAS 440.61 440.61 Peninsula-D Shape, Modesty Panel, High-Pressure Laminate, 30x72 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL COLUMN :4750 CHAMPAGNE METALLIC EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OF-217 181 1 TS5HLRR2448 STEELCAS 458.85 458.85 Return-Right Hand,High-Pressure Laminate,24x48 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL

Quotation Page 36 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount Tag For: OF-217 182 3 TS5HL2436F2 STEELCAS 506.16 1,518.48 File-Freestanding Lateral, High-Pressure Laminate,24dx28 1/2hx36w BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-217 183 5 TS5TLBK3672 STEELCAS 330.60 1,653.00 Bookcase-36wx72h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL TOP-SURF:26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL Tag For: OF217 185 1 TS4TBASE22 STEELCAS 180.12 180.12 Base-22" Diameter BASE :4750 CHAMPAGNE METALLIC Tag For: OFF 217 186 1 TS4THDR30 STEELCAS 142.50 142.50 Top-Round Table, High Pressure Laminate, 30" Diameter EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OFF 217 187 2 TS30104 STEELCAS 180.69 361.38 Chair-a la carte, Round Back, Guest, Leg Frame UPHLSTRY:5A21 RUST Tag For: L-03/217 188 2 TS31408 STEELCAS 957.60 1,915.20 Chair-Jenny, Lounge, Wood Arms ARMS :3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY UPHLSTRY:59DG GRADED IN PR. GRP. 7 DESIGNTEX GROUP

Quotation Page 37 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: OSCILLATE -3238 Color: MALLARD -401 Direction: VERTICAL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * LEG OPT *OPT:LEG OPTIONS WOOD WOOD LEGS LEGS LEGS WOOD VEN *LEGS:WOOD 3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: L-01A/219 189 1 CYLINDER TABLE TERRAIN 251.18 251.18 18" DIAMETER x 18"H OVERALL, Wilsonart Laminate-7054-60 WILD CHERRY 3"H BLACK PLINTH BASE Tag For: ST-01/219 190 1 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 180.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/220 191 1 TS5HLMD3672 STEELCAS 476.52 476.52 Peninsula-D Shape, Modesty Panel, High-Pressure Laminate, 36x72 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL COLUMN :4750 CHAMPAGNE METALLIC EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OF-220 192 1 TS5HLRL2448 STEELCAS 458.85 458.85 Return-Left Hand,High-Pressure Laminate, 24x48 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PED OPT *OPT:SINGLE PEDESTAL OPTIONS BBF PED BOX-BOX-FILE PEDESTAL PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL

Quotation Page 38 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-220 193 1 TSAEGROM STEELCAS 26.79 26.79 Grommets-Package/10 Tag For: OF-220 194 2 TS5HL2436F2 STEELCAS 506.16 1,012.32 File-Freestanding Lateral, High-Pressure Laminate,24dx28 1/2hx36w BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-220 195 2 TS5TLSB3637 STEELCAS 212.61 425.22 Bookcase-Stacking, 36w37 1/2h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL TOP-SURF:26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL Tag For: OF-220 196 1 TS30104 STEELCAS 180.69 180.69 Chair-a la carte, Round Back, Guest, Leg Frame UPHLSTRY:5A21 RUST Tag For: OF-220 197 4 383GA-STOOL COMMUNITY 164.50 658.00 MELROSE ALL WOOD STOOL, horizontal slat back, MWO MEDIUM WALNUT ON OAK Tag For: CH-11/228 198 4 TS31401 STEELCAS 673.17 2,692.68 Chair-Jenny,Armless UPHLSTRY:59DB GRADED IN PR. GRP. 2 DESIGNTEX GROUP Purchaser: VENDOR Pattern: LUDINGTON -3285

Quotation Page 39 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount Color: EARTH -702 Direction: HORIZONTAL OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * LEG OPT *OPT:LEG OPTIONS WOOD WOOD LEGS LEGS LEGS WOOD VEN *LEGS:WOOD 3412 FC/OP NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: L-02/228 199 3 CYLINDER TABLE TERRAIN 251.18 753.54 18" DIAMETER x 18"H OVERALL, Wilsonart Laminate-7054-60 WILD CHERRY 3"H BLACK PLINTH BASE Tag For: ST-01/228 Subsection Sub Total 153,165.01 DELAWARE - NON TAXABLE 0.00 Subsection Total 153,165.01 END Subsection BEG Subsection 3RD FLOOR 200 1 1961-6 GLOBAL I 285.00 285.00 ALERO-Medium Back Pneumatic Task chair w/arms - Fabric FINISHES ~03 GRADE 03 ~DRMA DRAMA D804 1-BLACK ARM GL A-(STD) HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE SSU FRAME/EDGE BK F-(STD) BLACK CASTER/KEYS (OPT) C1 C-(STD) 2" DUAL-WHL CASTOR - BLCK CHAIR BASES (OPT) ~ (STD) CYLINDER OPTION (OPT) ~ (STD) SEATING FOAM (OPT) ~ (STD) ARM WIDTH (OPT) ~ (STD) Tag For: CH-12/301 201 1 2243 GLOBAL I 184.00 184.00 DRAFTING STOOL KIT-W/ 10 gas cylinder. Chrome outer ring.

Quotation Page 40 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount Tag For: CH-12/301 202 16 59003 FIXTURES 137.70 2,203.20 Pulse Armless Chair- Thermoplastic CC Clear Plastic Glide Upgrade ~ No Gang Upgrade P13 THERMO: Cornflower E06 FRAME: Satin Silver Tag For: CH-07/301 203 16 59003 FIXTURES 137.70 2,203.20 Pulse Armless Chair- Thermoplastic CC Clear Plastic Glide Upgrade ~ No Gang Upgrade P16 THERMO: Kiwi E06 FRAME: Satin Silver Tag For: CH-08/301 204 10 480120 STEELCAS 367.08 3,670.80 Chair-node, Tripod Base, Personal Worksurface BASE :6249 PLATINUM SOLID PAINT :4799 PLATINUM METALLIC SHELL :6333 PICASSO SURFACE :6249 PLATINUM SOLID OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * CASTERS *OPT:CASTERS OPTIONS HARD CST HARD CASTERS CUPHLDER *OPT:CUP HOLDER OPTION NO CUP NO CUP HOLDER Tag For: CH-09/301 205 1 LNSH3060CH/SM/LV FIXTURES 2,148.66 2,148.66 Teacher Station, 30x60, seated height, crank Adj, LH Small Cab Stg, RIGHT HAND LRG CAB , HPLBP High Pressure Laminate Back Panel E06 SATIN SILVER WOODGRAIN LAMINATES Woodgrain Laminates L14 ZEBRANO

Quotation Page 41 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount LD Solid Urethane U0 WROUGHT IRON M05 WROUGHT IRON ~ No Rack ~ Casters BP Black Pulls On Storage Tag For: DE-01/301 206 5 EN9201U JASPER 862.45 4,312.25 ENCORE SINGLE SEAT, UPH ARM Grade D ~ MOMENTUM VERGE 09097702 COLOR: LIVING S SATIN NICKEL LCL LOUNGE COLUMN LEG S SATIN NICKEL Tag For: L-07A/301 207 5 EN9201U JASPER 862.45 4,312.25 ENCORE SINGLE SEAT, UPH ARM Grade D ~ MOMENTUM VERGE 09097702 COLOR: DENIM S SATIN NICKEL LCL LOUNGE COLUMN LEG S SATIN NICKEL Tag For: L-07B/301 208 1 OPEC-02C TERRAIN 2,850.00 2,850.00 CUSTOM UNIT AS PER DRAWING OPAC-02C PROVIDED BY HOLZMAN MOSS BOTTINO ARCHITURE. VENEER WITH CUSTOM FINISH TO MATCH COMMUNITY NATURAL MAPLE ON BEECH INSET: MARMOLEUM REAL COLOR: 3173 VAN GOGH Tag For: OP-02C/301

Quotation Page 42 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount 209 3 TS4TWP STEELCAS 254.79 764.37 Campfire-Personal Table Tag For: ST-05/301 ONLY 1 FINISH AVAILABLE 210 4 TS4TPT STEELCAS 513.00 2,052.00 Campfire-Paper Table BASE :2539 WARM OAK (HPL) Tag For: ST-06/301 211 4 TS4TPTG STEELCAS 76.95 307.80 Campfire-Glass For Paper Table Tag For: ST-06/301 212 2 CUSTOM BENCHING UNIT TERRAIN 2,082.40 4,164.80 (2) 48x96 LAMINATE TABLE WITH METAL H-LEGS, METAL TABLE TOP TROUGH FOR ACCESS TO CABLING & POWER (NIC)IN CENTERED RACEWAY UNDER TABLE TOP. TERRAIN STANDARD WILSONART FUSION MAPLE LAMINATE & EDGE TERRAIN STANDARD PAINT 213 4 TS4THDR48 STEELCAS 221.16 884.64 Top-Round Table, High Pressure Laminate, 48" Diameter EDGE :6038 BLONDE ON MAPLE TOP-SURF:2592 BLONDE ON MAPLE Tag For: TA-14/301 214 4 TS4TBASE28 STEELCAS 266.19 1,064.76 Base-28" Diameter BASE :4750 CHAMPAGNE METALLIC Tag For: TA-14/301 215 2 9798BL SAFCO PR 132.68 265.36 AT YOUR DISPOSAL RECYCLING CENTER, 46"w x 16"d x 33"h, impact and moisture resistant polyethylene, three separate, 28 gallon bins under one lid, Decals are included Tag For: TR-01/RM 301 216 1 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 180.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: CH-02/304 217 1 TS5HLMD3672 STEELCAS 476.52 476.52 Peninsula-D Shape, Modesty Panel,

Quotation Page 43 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount High-Pressure Laminate, 36x72 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL COLUMN :4750 CHAMPAGNE METALLIC EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OF-304 218 1 TS5HLRL2448 STEELCAS 458.85 458.85 Return-Left Hand,High-Pressure Laminate, 24x48 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PED OPT *OPT:SINGLE PEDESTAL OPTIONS BBF PED BOX-BOX-FILE PEDESTAL PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-304 219 2 TS5HL2436F2 STEELCAS 506.16 1,012.32 File-Freestanding Lateral, High-Pressure Laminate,24dx28 1/2hx36w BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6676 MARBLED MAPLE FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-304 220 2 TS5TLSB3637 STEELCAS 212.61 425.22 Bookcase-Stacking, 36w37 1/2h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL TOP-SURF:26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL

Quotation Page 44 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount 221 1 TS5LBBF23U STEELCAS 285.00 285.00 Pedestal-Underworksurface, Box/Box/File, 23dx27h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-304 222 1 TS30104 STEELCAS 180.69 180.69 Chair-a la carte, Round Back, Guest, Leg Frame UPHLSTRY:5A21 RUST Tag For: L-03/304 223 1 TS5HLEL2466 STEELCAS 434.34 434.34 Shell-Extended Corner,Curved Front, Left Hand,High-Pressure Laminate, 24x66x36 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OF-305 224 1 TS5HLUR2448 STEELCAS 239.97 239.97 Shell-Return,Right Hand, High-Pressure Laminate,24x48 BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL EDGE :6034 NATURAL CHERRY TOP-SURF:2412 NATURAL CHERRY Tag For: OF-305 225 1 TS5LBBF23U STEELCAS 285.00 285.00 Pedestal-Underworksurface, Box/Box/File, 23dx27h BASIC :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL FRONT :26L1 NATURAL CHERRY (VERSION 2) LPL LOCK :9201 POLISHED CHROME OPTIONS * * OPTIONS * * PULLS *OPT:PULL OPTIONS

Quotation Page 45 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL Extended Line Quantity Catalog No./Description Unit Price Amount HDL PULL HANDLE PULL PULL PULL NICKEL *PULL:NICKEL 9211 NICKEL Tag For: OF-305 226 1 TSAEGROM STEELCAS 26.79 26.79 Grommets-Package/10 Tag For: OF-305 227 1 OTG11641B OFFICES TO 180.00 180.00 MESH BACK TASK CHAIR, BLACK LEATHER SEAT, BLACK FRAME Tag For: OF-305 Subsection Sub Total 35,857.79 DELAWARE - NON TAXABLE 0.00 Subsection Total 35,857.79 END Subsection 228 1 DESIGN CONTINGENCY CORPORAT 8,943.12 8,943.12 BUDGETARY DESIGN CONTINGENCY BASED ON 3% OF THE TOTAL FOR ANY FUTURE REVISIONS THAT COULD ADD TO THE COST OF THE OVERALL JOB. QUOTATION TOTALS Sub Total 308,617.30 DELAWARE - NON TAXABLE 0.00 Grand Total 308,617.30 *******End of Quotation*******

Quotation Page 46 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL

Quotation Page 47 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL

Quotation Page 48 of 48 (cont'd) Quote Quote Customer Account Project Number Date Customer Order Number Number Representative Number 113375 2/16/2012 STA004 SHAWN BELL

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2012-07 WITH LF&A #1 (LF&A Amendment Indicated in Red Strikeout) 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL 2 MET: 3 That the City of Dover Code of Ordinances be amended by inserting a new Appendix E - Commercial 4 Building Redevelopment, as follows: 5 APPENDIX E - COMMERCIAL BUILDING REDEVELOPMENT 6 ARTICLE I. - INTENT. 7 The city council has deemed it to be in the best interests of the residents of the city and in furtherance 8 of their health, safety, and welfare to promote the renovation and utilization of commercial buildings 9 on the city's principal commercial corridors. In order to promote the business growth and 10 reutilization of vacant commercial buildings along these corridors, city council has determined that 11 incentives in the forms of tax abatements, impact fee waivers, and building permit waivers should 12 be offered. 13 ARTICLE II. - ELIGIBILITY. 14 Section 1. - Eligible project. 15 Eligible project shall mean the renovation and establishment of a business in an existing 16 commercial building or tenant space which: 17 (a) Is located or addressed on U.S. Route 13, Bay Road, Court Street between U.S. Route 13 and 18 Bay Road, and Delaware Route 8 west of the railroad tracks; 19 (a) Is a minimum of 5,000 square feet of floor area; 20 (b) The fair market value of the materials to be used in and the labor to be performed on the 21 project exceeds the sum of $15,000.00; 22 (c) Is for commercial or office use; 23 (d) The establishment of a new business is proposed; and 24 (e) Conforms to the intent of this ordinance. 25 Construction or renovation of accessory buildings as defined in Appendix B - Zoning, Article 12 26 - Definitions, of the Dover code of ordinances shall not be eligible for redevelopment incentives. 27 Construction or renovation which constitutes ordinary replacement or routine maintenance shall not 28 qualify as an eligible project. Construction of new buildings shall not qualify as an eligible project.

Proposed Ordinance #2012-07 - New Appendix E - Commercial Building Redevelopment w/LF&A#1 Page 2 29 Section 2. - Redevelopment incentive ineligibility. 30 An otherwise eligible project shall be ineligible for redevelopment incentives if: 31 (a) An application for a building permit for the project was filed prior to the effective date of this 32 ordinance; or 33 (b) Construction or renovation commenced prior to the effective date of this ordinance; 34 (c) Issuance of the certificate of occupancy and/or the completion and finalization of the building 35 permit occurs before the application for redevelopment incentives is received; 36 (d) Construction or renovation commenced prior to the issuance of a building permit by the city 37 of Dover; 38 (e) Applications for incentives provided in this ordinance shall be subject to the provisions of 39 Chapter 1 - General Provisions, Section 1-13 - Denial of permits or approvals for failure to 40 comply with requirements for payment, actions, or filings. 41 ARTICLE III - INCENTIVES. 42 Section 1. - Waiver of fees. 43 Renovations meeting the eligibility requirements shall be eligible for the following incentives: 44 (a) Partial waiver of permit fees. Fifty percent of the fees for building, plumbing, mechanical, 45 and fire protection permits shall be waived for eligible projects. Sign permit fees shall not 46 be waived. 47 (b) Partial waiver of impact fees. For projects where renovation will constitute an increase in 48 equivalent dwelling units (EDU's) and require payment of impact fees, fifty percent of the 49 City's portion of the water and sewer impact fees shall be waived. The Kent County impact 50 fees and administrative charges shall not be waived. 51 Section 2. - Tax abatement. 52 Eligible projects shall receive property tax waivers for a period not to exceed ten years so that 53 improvements to the properties made in accordance with the intent of this ordinance will not be 54 taxed for a period of time not to exceed ten years from the date of the making of the 55 improvements. The said ten-year period will commence with the date of issuance of a building 56 permit. The property tax waiver shall apply only to the improvements and not to the property 57 value assessed prior to the improvements. 58 ARTICLE IV. - ADMINISTRATION. 59 The city manager and his staff shall develop the administrative procedures necessary to implement 60 this ordinance. The city manager and his staff shall promulgate reasonable standards to be used in 61 determining whether an eligible project shall receive redevelopment incentives and, if so, which incentives 62 shall be granted. Administrative staff shall review applications for redevelopment incentives and grant 63 incentives to eligible projects. Applicants shall be notified in writing of the action taken on their 64 applications.

Proposed Ordinance #2012-07 - New Appendix E - Commercial Building Redevelopment w/LF&A#1 Page 3 65 ARTICLE V. - APPEALS. 66 Applicants denied redevelopment incentives shall have the right to appeal the decision to the city 67 council within 30 days from the date of mailing of the formal notification. Such appeal shall be in writing, 68 signed by the owner of the property in question, and filed with the city clerk. 69 ARTICLE VI. - SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATES. 70 Section 1. - Severability. 71 Should any section or provision of this ordinance be declared to be unconstitutional or otherwise 72 invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any part thereof 73 other than the parts so declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. 74 Section 2. - Effective dates. 75 This ordinance shall be effective as of April 15, 2012. The provisions of this ordinance shall no 76 longer apply after December 31, 2015. 77 ADOPTED: * 78 S:\ORDINANCES\2012\Draft\2012-07 - New Appendix E - Commercial Building Redevelopment-w LF&A Amd No 1 - 1st Rdg.wpd 79 SYNOPSIS 80 The proposed ordinance would allow a partial waiver of building permit fees 81 and city impact fees, as well as tax abatement on improvements, for 82 redevelopment of vacant commercial buildings on Route 13, Bay Road, Court 83 Street between Bay Road and Route 13, and Route 8 west of the railroad 84 tracks. 85 (SPONSORS: STAFF) 86 Actions History: 87 Mar. 12, 2012 - Scheduled for First Reading Before City Council 88 Feb. 27, 2012 - Considered by the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2012-06 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL 2 MET: 3 That the Dover Code of Ordinances be amended by inserting a new Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew, to read 4 as follows: 5 Chapter 59 - JUVENILE CURFEW 6 Sec. 59-1. - Definitions. 7 When not inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future, words 8 in the plural number include the singular, and words in the singular number include the plural. The word 9 "shall" is always mandatory and not merely directory. The following words, terms and phrases, when used 10 in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly 11 indicates a different meaning: 12 City means the City of Dover, Delaware, with administrative offices at 15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, 13 Delaware. 14 Emergency means an unforeseen combination of circumstances or the resulting state that calls for 15 immediate action. The term includes, but is not limited to, a fire, natural disaster, automobile accident, or 16 any situation requiring immediate action to prevent serious bodily injury or loss of life. 17 Establishment means any privately owned place of business operated for a profit to which the public 18 is invited, including, but not limited to, any place of amusement or entertainment. 19 Juvenile or Minor means any unemancipated person under the age of 17 or, in equivalent phrasing 20 often herein employed, any person 16 or fewer years of age. 21 Operator means any individual, firm, association, partnership, or corporation operating, managing, 22 or conducting any establishment. The term includes the members or partners of an association or partnership 23 and the officers of a corporation. 24 Parent means any person having legal custody of a juvenile: 25 (1) As a natural or adoptive parent. 26 (2) As a legal guardian. 27 (3) As a person who stands in loco parentis. 28 (4) As a person to whom legal custody has been given by court order.

Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 - Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew Page 2 29 Public Place means any place to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access and 30 includes, but is not limited to, streets, common areas of schools, shopping centers, parking lots, parks, 31 playgrounds, transportation facilities, theaters, restaurants, shops, bowling alleys, taverns, cafes, arcades, 32 and similar areas that are open to the use of the public. As a type of public place, a street is a way or place, 33 of whatever nature, open to the use of the public as a matter of right for purposes of vehicular travel or, in 34 the case of a sidewalk thereof, for pedestrian travel. "Street" includes that legal right-of-way, including, but 35 not limited to, the cartway of traffic lanes, the curb, the sidewalks, whether paved or unpaved, and any grass 36 plots or other grounds found within the legal right-of-way of a street. 37 Remain means to stay behind, to tarry, and to stay unnecessarily in a public place, including the 38 congregating of groups (or of interacting minors) totaling four or more persons in which any juvenile 39 involved would not be using the streets for ordinary or serious purposes such as mere passage or going 40 home, or to fail to leave the premises of an establishment when requested to do so by a police officer or the 41 operator of an establishment. To implement this provision with additional precision and precaution, 42 numerous exceptions are expressly defined in this chapter. More exceptions become available with a 43 juvenile's increasing years and advancing maturity as appropriate in the interest of reasonable regulation. 44 Time of Night means based upon the prevailing standard of time, whether Eastern standard time or 45 Eastern daylight savings time, generally observed at that hour by the public in the city, prima facie the time 46 then observed in the city administrative offices and police station. 47 Years of Age means continues from one birthday, such as the 16th, to (but not including the day of) 48 the next, such as the 17th birthday, making it clear that 16 or fewer years of age is herein treated as 49 equivalent to the phrase "under 17 years of age." Similarly, for example, 11 or fewer years of age means 50 "under 12 years of age." 51 Sec. 59-2. - Curfew established. 52 (a) School year curfew. It shall be unlawful for any person 16 years or fewer of age (under 17) to be or 53 remain in or upon a public place within the City of Dover during the Caesar Rodney/Capital School 54 District designated school year for the period ending at 6:00 a.m. and beginning: 55 (1) At 12:00 midnight on Friday and Saturday nights; and 56 (2) At 11:00 p.m. on all other nights. 57 (b) Summer curfew. It shall be unlawful for any person 16 years or fewer of age (under 17) to be or remain 58 in or upon a public place within the City of Dover during the Caesar Rodney/Capital School District 59 designated summer break for the period ending at 6:00 a.m. and beginning: 60 (1) At 1:00 a.m. on Friday and Saturday nights; and 61 (2) At 12:00 midnight on all other nights.

Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 - Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew Page 3 62 Sec. 59-3. - Exceptions. 63 (a) The following shall constitute valid exceptions to the operation of this chapter: 64 (1) Accompanied by parent. When a juvenile is accompanied by a parent of such juvenile. 65 (2) Accompanied by authorized adult. When a juvenile is accompanied by an adult authorized by 66 a parent of such juvenile to take said parent's place in accompanying said juvenile for a 67 designated period of time and purpose within a specified area. 68 (3) Errand directed, in writing, by parent. When the juvenile is on an errand as directed by his/her 69 parent, provided that such juvenile shall have on his/her person a written note, signed by the 70 juvenile's parent, stating: 71 a. The date and time that the note was written (which shall not be more than 24 hours before 72 the time of the errand); 73 b. The name of the juvenile; 74 c. The name, address, and telephone number of the parent; and 75 d. The specific errand directed by the parent. 76 (4) Emergency. When a juvenile is assisting in an emergency, including, by way of example and not 77 in limitation, responding as a member of a volunteer fire company to a fire company or 78 paramedic call. 79 (5) First amendment rights. When a juvenile is exercising first amendment rights protected by the 80 United States Constitution, such as the free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, and the right 81 of assembly, by first delivering, to the person designated by the city's chief of police to receive 82 such information, a written communication, signed by the juvenile and countersigned, if 83 practicable, by a parent of the juvenile, with his/her home address and telephone number, 84 specifying when, where, and in what manner the juvenile will be in a public place during hours 85 when this chapter is applicable to said minor in the exercise of a first amendment right specified 86 in such communication. 87 (6) Reasonable necessity. In case of reasonable necessity for the juvenile remaining in a public place, 88 but only after the juvenile's parent has communicated to the chief of police or the person 89 designated by the chief of police to receive such notifications the facts establishing the 90 reasonable necessity relating to a specified public place at a designated time for a described 91 purpose, including points of origin and destination. A copy of the communication, or of the 92 police record thereof, duly certified by the chief of police to be correct, with an appropriate 93 notation of the time it was received and of the names and addresses of the parent and juvenile, 94 shall be admissible evidence. 95 (7) On own or neighbor's property. When a juvenile is on the sidewalk or property where the 96 juvenile resides, or on either side of or across the street from the place where the juvenile resides, 97 and the adult owner or resident of that property has given permission for the juvenile to be there.

Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 - Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew Page 4 98 (8) Returning home within one hour of official activity. When a juvenile is returning home from, and 99 within one hour of, the termination or closing of an official school, religious, or other 100 recreational activity supervised by adults, sponsored by the City of Dover, a recognized 101 charitable, benevolent, or civic association, or a similar entity that takes responsibility for the 102 minor. 103 (9) Special permit (individual). When authorized by special permit from the chief of police carried 104 on the person of the juvenile thus authorized, as follows: 105 a. When necessary nighttime activities of a juvenile may be inadequately provided for by other 106 provisions of this chapter, then recourse may be had to the chief of police, either for a 107 regulation as provided in subsection (a)(10) or for a special permit as the circumstances 108 warrant. 109 b. Upon a finding of undue hardship and reasonable necessity for the use of a public place to 110 the extent warranted by a written application signed by a juvenile and by a parent of the 111 juvenile, if feasible, stating: the name, age, and address of the juvenile; the name, address, 112 and telephone number of a parent thereof; the height, weight, sex, color of eyes and hair, and 113 other physical characteristics of the juvenile; the necessity that requires the juvenile to remain 114 upon a public place during the curfew hours otherwise applicable and the undue hardship that 115 will result if such permit is not granted; the public place; and the beginning and ending of 116 the period of time involved, by date and hour, the chief of police may grant a permit, in 117 writing, for the juvenile's use of a public place at such hours as in the opinion of the chief of 118 police may reasonably be necessary and consistent with the purposes of this chapter. In an 119 emergency, this may be handled by prior telephone or other effective communication, with 120 a corresponding record being made contemporaneously by the chief of police or by the 121 person designated by the chief of police to act on his/her behalf in an emergency at the police 122 station. 123 (10) Special regulation (group). When authorized by regulation issued by the chief of police in other 124 similar cases of reasonable necessity, similarly handled but adapted to reasonably necessary 125 nighttime activities of more juveniles than can readily be dealt with on an individual special 126 permit basis, but only where such juveniles will be under the active supervision of adults 127 responsible for such juveniles. Normally such regulation by the chief of police permitting use 128 of public places should be issued sufficiently in advance to permit appropriate publicity through 129 news media and through other agencies, such as the schools, and shall define the activity, the 130 scope of the use of the public places permitted, the period of time involved, not to extend more 131 than one hour beyond the time for termination of the activity, and the reason for finding that the 132 regulation is reasonably necessary and is consistent with the purposes of this chapter. 133 (11) Employment necessity. When the juvenile is legally employed, going to or returning home from 134 employment, and carries a certified card of employment, renewable each calendar month when 135 the current facts so warrant, dated or reissued not more than 45 days previously, signed by the 136 parent and employer and briefly identifying the juvenile, the addresses and telephone numbers 137 of the juvenile's home and place of employment, and the juvenile's hours of employment. The 138 city shall prepare a form to be used by employers for purposes of this subsection.

Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 - Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew Page 5 139 (12) Interstate or intrastate travel. When the juvenile is, with parental consent, engaged in normal 140 interstate or intrastate travel through the city or originating or terminating in the city. 141 (13) Married. When the juvenile is married or has been married pursuant to state law. 142 (14) Operator of establishment. In the case of an operator of an establishment, when the operator has 143 notified the police that a juvenile was present on the premises of the establishment during curfew 144 hours and refused to leave. 145 (b) Continuing consideration of exceptions. Each of the foregoing exceptions and their several limitations, 146 such as provisions for notification, are severable, as hereinafter provided but here reemphasized, and 147 will be considered by Council when warranted by future experience. 148 Sec. 59-4. - Parental responsibility. 149 (a) The foregoing exceptions to the operation of this chapter shall act only to create a waiver of 150 enforcement and affirmative defense(s) to such enforcement. By authorizing such exceptions, neither 151 the city nor any member of the police department shall assume any affirmative obligation or duty to 152 supervise the well-being of any juvenile acting pursuant to such authorized exception. 153 (b) It shall be unlawful for a parent having legal custody of a juvenile knowingly to permit or by inefficient 154 control to allow the juvenile to remain in any city public place under circumstances not constituting 155 an exception to, or otherwise beyond the scope of, this chapter. The term "knowingly" includes 156 knowledge that a parent should reasonably be expected to have concerning the whereabouts of a 157 juvenile in that parent's legal custody. This requirement is intended to hold a neglectful or careless 158 parent up to a reasonable community standard of parental responsibility through an objective test. It 159 shall, therefore, be no defense that a parent was completely indifferent to the activities or conduct or 160 whereabouts of such juvenile. 161 (c) It shall be unlawful for any parent to knowingly (as defined above) provide any false authorization, 162 information or certification, written or verbal, to the Dover police department in order to obtain an 163 exception to the operation of this chapter under Sec. 59-3 hereof. 164 Sec. 59-5. - Operator responsibility. 165 It shall be unlawful for any operator of an establishment to knowingly permit a juvenile to remain at the 166 establishment under circumstances not constituting an exception to, or otherwise beyond the scope of, this 167 chapter. The term "knowingly" includes knowledge that an operator should reasonably be expected to have 168 concerning the patrons of the establishment. The standard for "knowingly" shall be applied through an 169 objective test: whether a reasonable person in the operator's position should have known that the patron was 170 a juvenile in violation of this chapter. 171 Sec. 59-6. - Enforcement. 172 (a) If a police officer reasonably believes that a juvenile is in a public place in violation of this chapter, 173 the officer shall notify the juvenile that he/she is in violation of this chapter and shall require the 174 juvenile to provide his/her name, address, and telephone number and how to contact his/her parent or

Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 - Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew Page 6 175 guardian. In determining the age of the juvenile and in the absence of convincing evidence, such as 176 a birth certificate, a police officer shall, in the first instance of violation of the chapter, use his/her best 177 judgment in determining age. 178 (b) The police officer shall issue the juvenile a written warning that the juvenile is in violation of this 179 chapter and order the juvenile to go promptly home. The chief of police shall send the parent or 180 guardian of the juvenile written notice of the violation pursuant to subsection (f) hereof. 181 (c) Police procedures shall constantly be refined in the light of experience and may provide that the police 182 officer may deliver to a parent or guardian thereof a juvenile under appropriate circumstances; for 183 example, a juvenile of tender age, near home, whose identity and address may readily be ascertained 184 or are known. 185 (d) Notwithstanding subsection (b) of this section, when a juvenile has received one previous written 186 warning for violation of this chapter or a police officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the 187 juvenile has engaged in delinquent conduct, the procedure shall then be to take the juvenile to the 188 police station where a parent or guardian shall immediately be notified to come for the juvenile, 189 whereupon the parent or guardian and the juvenile shall be questioned. This is intended to permit 190 ascertainment, under constitutional safeguards, of relevant facts and to centralize responsibility in the 191 person designated there and then on duty for accurate, effective, fair, impartial, and uniform 192 enforcement and recording, thus making available experienced personnel and access to information 193 and records. 194 (e) When a parent or guardian, immediately called, has come to take charge of the juvenile and the 195 appropriate information has been recorded, the juvenile shall be released to the custody of such parent. 196 If the parent cannot be located or fails to take charge of the juvenile, then the juvenile shall be released 197 to the juvenile authorities, except to the extent that, in accordance with police regulations approved 198 in advance by juvenile authorities, the juvenile may temporarily be entrusted to an adult, neighbor, or 199 other person who will on behalf of a parent or guardian assume the responsibility of caring for the 200 juvenile pending the availability or arrival of a parent or guardian. 201 (f) In the case of a first violation of this chapter by a juvenile, the chief of police shall, by certified mail, 202 send to a parent or guardian written notice of the violation, with a warning that any subsequent 203 violation will result in full enforcement of this chapter, including enforcement of parental 204 responsibility and of applicable penalties. 205 (g) For the first violation of this chapter by an operator of an establishment who permits a juvenile to 206 remain on the premises, a police officer shall issue a written notice of the violation with a warning that 207 any subsequent violation will result in full enforcement of the chapter, including enforcement of 208 operator responsibility and of applicable penalties. 209 (h) In any event the police officer shall, within 24 hours, file a written report with the chief of police or 210 shall participate, to the extent of the information for which he/she is responsible, in the preparation of 211 a report on the curfew violation. It is not the intention of this section to require extensive reports that 212 will prevent police officers from performing their primary police duties. The reports shall be as simple 213 as is reasonably possible and may be completed by police department personnel other than sworn 214 police officers.

Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 - Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew Page 7 215 Sec. 59-7. - Violations and penalties. 216 (a) Parents. 217 (1) Offenses by the parent. If, after the warning notice pursuant to Sec. 59-6 of a first violation by 218 a juvenile, a parent violates Sec. 59-4 (in connection with a second violation by the juvenile), this 219 shall be treated as a first offense by the parent. For offenses by a parent, the fines shall be as 220 provided for in Appendix F - Fees and Fines. [First offense by a parent - $50, and for each 221 subsequent offense by a parent the fine shall be increased by an additional $20: e.g., $70 for the 222 second offense and $90 for the third offense.[Locate in Appendix F] Any court of competent 223 jurisdiction, upon finding a parent guilty, shall sentence the parent to pay this fine and the cost 224 of prosecution. 225 (2) Personnel costs. The parent or legal guardian having custody of a juvenile subject to this section 226 shall be liable for all costs incurred by the City of Dover for providing personnel to remain in the 227 company of a juvenile who has been detained as a curfew violator if the parent or guardian does 228 not pick up the juvenile within one hour after receiving notice from the city that the city is 229 detaining the juvenile for a curfew violation. The amount to be paid by the parent or guardian 230 shall be as provided for in Appendix F - Fees and Fines. [Locate in Appendix F] [based on the 231 hourly wage of the city employee who is assigned to remain with the juvenile plus the cost of 232 benefits for that employee.] 233 (3) The parent or legal guardian having custody of a juvenile subject to this section shall be liable 234 for any fine or condition of restitution or reparation imposed by a court upon a curfew violator, 235 provided that the curfew violator has not paid the fine or made restitution or reparation within 236 the time ordered by the court and further provided that the parent or legal guardian has been 237 made a party defendant in all enforcement proceedings against the curfew violator and shall be 238 served with all citations, summons, complaints, notices, and other documents required to be 239 served on the curfew violator defendant. 240 (b) Juveniles. Any juvenile who shall violate any of the provisions of this chapter more than three times 241 shall be reported by the chief of police to the juvenile authorities as a juvenile in need of supervision, 242 and the chief of police may proceed to file such charges with the courts as he/she may deem 243 appropriate. 244 (c) Operators. If, after the warning notice pursuant to Sec. 59-6 of a violation of this chapter, an operator 245 of an establishment violates Sec. 59-5 a second time, this shall be treated as a first offense by the 246 operator. For offenses by an operator, the fines shall be as provided for in Appendix F - Fees and 247 Fines. [Locate in Appendix F] [$50, and for each subsequent offense by an operator the fine shall be 248 increased by an additional $20: e.g., $70 for the second offense and $90 for the third offense.] 249 (d) False certification. Any parent convicted of knowingly providing any false authorization, information 250 or certification, written or verbal, to the Dover police department in violation of Sec. 59-4(c) shall pay 251 a fine as provided for in Appendix F - Fees and Fines. [Locate in Appendix F] [$50 for the first 252 offense, and for each subsequent offense the fine shall be increased by an additional $20, plus costs.]

Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 - Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew Page 8 253 Sec. 59-8. - Advisory opinions. 254 The city manager, after consultation with the city solicitor, is hereby authorized to give advisory opinions, 255 in writing, which shall be binding and shall be adhered to by the police until the chapter is amended in such 256 respect, interpreting terms, phrases, parts, or any provisions. Normally such advisory opinions shall be in 257 response to good faith, signed letters addressed to the city manager or to a member of the city council 258 questioning this chapter as ambiguous, having a potentially chilling effect on constitutional rights 259 specifically invoked or otherwise invalid, in all three categories with respect to proposed conduct definitely 260 described. This administrative remedy must be exhausted prior to presenting to any court a question in any 261 of the three categories. The city council does not intend a result through the enforcement of this chapter that 262 is absurd, impossible of execution, or unreasonable. Council intends that the chapter be held inapplicable 263 in such cases if anywhere its application would be unconstitutional under the Constitution of the State of 264 Delaware or the Constitution of the United States of America. 265 Sec. 59-9. - Continuing evaluation. 266 The city council shall continue its evaluation and updating of this chapter through methods including but 267 not limited to the following: 268 (a) Within six months after the implementation of this chapter, the chief of police shall provide the city 269 council with a report concerning the effect of this chapter on crimes committed by and against minors 270 and of the number of warnings issued and arrests of minors, parents, and operators hereunder and such 271 other information as council may request. 272 (b) On a regular basis, the city council shall receive informal reports of all exceptional cases hereunder 273 of reasonable necessity, the notices of school and other activities, the special permits and the 274 regulations authorized above, and the advisory opinions for consideration by the council in further 275 updating and continuing evaluation of this chapter. 276 Sec. 59-10. - Notice. 277 Notice of the existence of this chapter and of the curfew regulations established by it shall be posted in, on, 278 or about such public or quasi-public places as may be determined by the city manager or the police 279 department in order that the public may be constantly informed of the existence of this chapter and its 280 regulations. 281 City of Dover 282 Juvenile Curfew Ordinance 283 Employment Certificate 284 Pursuant to Sec. 59-3(a) - 11 of the City of Dover Juvenile Curfew Ordinance, this shall certify that: 285 286 Juvenile's name 287 288 Address 289 290 Address

Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 - Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew Page 9 291 is currently employed by: 292 293 Employer's name 294 295 Employer's address 296 297 Employer's address 298 299 Employer's telephone no. 300 and that he/she is scheduled to work during the following hours: 301 Sun. ________ Mon. ________ Tue. ________ Wed. ________ 302 Thur. ________ Fri. ________ Sat. ________ 303 304 Parent's name (print) 305 306 Parent's signature Employer's signature 307 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT Appendix F - Fees and Fines, be amended by inserting the text 308 indicated in bold, blue, italics, as follows: 309 Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew 310 Sec. 59-7 Violations and penalties. First offense by a parent - $50; each subsequent offense by a parent shall be Subsec. (a)(1) Offenses by the parent increased by an additional $20: e.g., $70 for the second offense and $90 for the third offense.

Proposed Ordinance #2012-06 - Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew Page 10 Personnel costs incurred by the City of The hourly wage Dover for providing personnel to remain and cost of benefits in the company of a juvenile who has of the city employee been detained as a curfew violator if the assigned to remain Subsec. (a)(2) parent or guardian does not pick up the with the juvenile juvenile within one hour after receiving notice from the city that the city is detaining the juvenile for a curfew violation. $50 for first offense by an operator; for each subsequent Operators - Any operator who knowingly offense the fine permits a juvenile to remain at the shall be increased Subsec. (c) establishment under circumstances not by an additional constituting an exception $20: e.g., $70 for the second offense and $90 for the third offense. $50 for the first False certification - Any parent convicted offense; for each of knowingly providing any false subsequent offense authorization, information or Subsec. (d) the fine shall be certification, written or verbal, to the increased by an Dover police department in violation of additional $20, plus Sec. 59-4(c) costs. 311 ADOPTED: * 312 S:\ORDINANCES\2012\Draft\2012-06 - New Chapter 59 - Juvenile Curfew-1ST RDG.wpd 313 SYNOPSIS 314 The proposed ordinance would establish a juvenile curfew. 315 (SPONSORS: HARE , ANDERSON , AND BONAR) 316 Actions History 317 Mar. 12, 2012 - Scheduled for First Reading by Council 318 Feb. 29, 2012 - Considered by the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee

FIRST READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2012-08 WITH S #1 (Staff Amendment Indicated in Red Strikeout) 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL 2 MET: 3 That Dover Code, Chapter 70 - Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions be amended to insert a new 4 Section 70-7 - Registered Sexual Offenders: 5 70-7. - Registered Sexual Offenders 6 (a) Registration Required. Sex offenders, as defined under the provisions of 11 Del. C., 7 c. 41, §4120A, shall register their places of residence and employment as required 8 under the provisions of 11 Del. C., c. 41, §4120. 9 (b) Prohibition on Residency and Employments. 10 (1) Sex offenders assigned as Risk Assessment Tier II or Tier III under the 11 provisions of 11 Del. C., c. 41, §4120, shall be prohibited from residence or 12 employment within 500 feet of a day care center as defined in Appendix B - 13 Zoning, Article 12 - Definitions, of the Dover Code. 14 (2) Any sex offender assigned as Risk Assessment Tier II or Tier III who 15 maintains residence or employment within 500 feet of a day care center on 16 the date of adoption of this ordinance shall comply with the provisions of the 17 ordinance within 12 months. 18 (3) Any sex offender who is under 18 years of age and resides with a parent or 19 legal guardian shall be exempt from the provision of subsection (b)(2) of this 20 section. 21 (c) Prohibition on rentals and leaseholds. 22 (1) It is unlawful for a property owner to knowingly and intentionally with actual 23 knowledge and after being made aware the person is a sexual offender let or 24 rent any place, structure, or part thereof, to a sexual offender, with the 25 knowledge that it will be used as a permanent or temporary residence, if such 26 place, structure or part thereof, is located within 500 feet of any day care 27 center. In any prosecution for a violation of this section it must be shown: 28 a. That the property owner knowingly and intentionally with actual 29 knowledge and after being made aware the person is a sexual offender 30 let or rented the premises to a person who was a registered sexual 31 offender; and

Proposed Ordinance #2012-08 with SA-1 - Amending Chpt 70 - Offenses & Misc Provisions Page 2 32 b. The property owner had actual knowledge that the place, structure, or 33 part thereof would be used by the registered sexual offender as a 34 permanent or temporary residence of property located within the 35 residential zoning classification. 36 Nothing herein shall be deemed to require the property owner to make any 37 independent determination whether the person is a sexual offender. 38 (2) Exclusions. A sexual offender abiding, lodging, or residing in a permanent 39 or temporary residence within 500 feet of any day care center does not 40 commit a violation of this section provided the sexual offender is in full 41 compliance with probation, parole, or conditional release, and does not 42 commit another sexual offense, and is in compliance with the residency 43 restrictions, if any of the following: 44 a. The sexual offender was a minor when committing the offense 45 causing the designation as a sexual offender and was not sentenced 46 as an adult for that offense. 47 b. The sexual offender is under the age of 18. 48 c. The day care center was opened or established after the sexual 49 offender established the permanent residence; and the residence 50 was reported and registered. 51 It is not the intent of this article to impair valid, existing and bona fide contract rights, 52 provided however that the provisions of this article shall apply upon final 53 termination. Extensions or renewals of any leasehold relationship is prohibited. 54 When a person who is the subject of this article changes residences, this article shall 55 fully apply to such persons. 56 (d) Measurement of distance. 57 For purposes of measuring separation of a residence from a day care center, all 58 distances shall be measured from the entrances and exits of the residence or place of 59 employment running in a direct line to the outermost entrances and exits of the day 60 care center. 61 (e) Prohibited Activities for Sexual Offenders. 62 (1) It is unlawful for any Sexual Offender to participate in a holiday event or 63 practice involving children under 18 years of age, such as distributing candy 64 or other items to children on Valentine's Day, Halloween, Christmas, or any 65 other holiday or event. Participation is to be defined as attendance at, or 66 taking part of, or cooperation with an event. 67 (2) It is unlawful for any Sexual Offender to wear costumes for the primary 68 purpose of entertaining, attracting, or encouraging interaction with children.

Proposed Ordinance #2012-08 with SA-1 - Amending Chpt 70 - Offenses & Misc Provisions Page 3 69 (3) Any person designated a sexual offender shall be required on October 70 thirty-first of each year or any other day upon which Halloween is celebrated 71 to: 72 a. Avoid all Halloween related contact with children; 73 b. Post a sign at his/her residence stating, "No candy or treats at this 74 residence." Such signs shall be in letters at least two inches high and 75 shall be legible from the street or road adjacent to the residence; 76 c. Except for lighting provided on a year round basis by a sexual 77 offender or the owner or manager of a multi-family residential unit 78 for the purpose of security or walkway or hallway illumination, all 79 outside residential lighting shall be off during the evening hours after 80 5:00 p.m., and no exterior holiday decorations shall be exhibited on 81 the sexual offender's residence or on the property upon which the 82 residence is located. 83 (4) Holiday events or practices in which the sexual offender is the parent or 84 guardian of the child or children involved, and where no non-familial 85 children are present, are exempt from this section. 86 (f) Penalties. Any person who violates this ordinance shall be fined in accordance with 87 Appendix F - Fees and Fines, Section 70-7. Every day that a violation occurs shall 88 constitute a separate offense. 89 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED That Appendix F- Fees and Fines be amended by adding a new 90 Section 70-7 under Chapter 70 - Offences and Miscellaneous Provisions as follows: 91 Sec. 70-7 Registered Sexual Offenders Subsec. (d) Penalties $500.00 for any offense; each day shall constitute a separate offense. 92 ADOPTED: * 93 SYNOPSIS 94 The proposed ordinance would prohibit registered Tier II and Tier III 95 sex offenders from living or working within 500 feet of a daycare 96 center and from participating in certain events involving children. 97 (Sponsors: Lynn, Anderson, Bonar) 98 Actions History: 99 March 9, 2012 - Scheduled for First Reading by City Council 100 February 29, 2012 - Considered by Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee

FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2012-03 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL 2 MET: 3 That Chapter 102 - Taxation, Article VI - Exemptions; Board of Assessment Appeals, Section 102-183 - Tax 4 Exemption for Senior Citizens, be amended by inserting the text indicated in bold, blue, italics and deleting 5 the text indicated in red strikeout as follows: 6 Sec. 102-183. - Tax exemption for senior citizens. 7 (a) Authority. This section is adopted to implement 22 Del. C. § 1001 et seq., granting exemptions from 8 municipal taxation on real property for persons 65 years of age or over. Compliance must be made 9 with such chapter 10 and this section in order to qualify for such exemption. 10 (b) Qualifications. The exemption shall be for real property owners 60 years of age or over. If qualified, 11 their real property shall be exempt from municipal taxation to the extent of the first $50,000.00 of 12 assessed valuation. This exemption shall be subject to the following: 13 (1) Owner resides alone. If the income of a property owner who resides alone exceeds the sum of 14 $15,851.00 (2008) for the income tax year immediately preceding the date of making an 15 application for the exemption, then the exemption shall not be granted. The maximum income 16 limit stated in the preceding sentence shall increase each year by the same percentage as the cost 17 of living adjustment granted to recipients of Social Security retirement benefits. 18 (2) Spouses reside together. If the income of a property owner and spouse who reside together 19 exceeds the sum of $22,192.00 (2008) for the income tax year immediately preceding the date 20 of making an application for the exemption, then the exemption shall not be granted. The 21 maximum income limit stated in the preceding sentence shall increase each year by the same 22 percentage as the cost of living adjustment granted to recipients of Social Security retirement 23 benefits. 24 (3) Exclusion from income. In computing income of the property owner in order to determine 25 entitlement for the deduction, Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) benefits up to 150 26 percent of the Social Security maximum benefit, Social Security benefits; and railroad pensions 27 and federal civil service retirement (not to exceed the sum of $35,190.00 (2010)—150 28 percent of the Social Security maximum benefit. The civil service retirement income 29 exclusion shall be based each year on the maximum Social Security benefit at 150 percent), 30 shall not be considered as income. 31 (4) Location, use of property. The real property must be located within the limits of the city and 32 must be used exclusively for residential purposes. 33 (5) Residence. The real property must be the legal residence of, and be occupied in whole or in part 34 by, the property owner.

Proposed Ordinance #2012-03 - Chpt 102-Taxation, Art. 6-Exemptions Page 2 35 (6) Owner of record. The property owner must be the owner of record of said real property as of 36 December 31 of the calendar year immediately preceding the date of making application for the 37 exemption. 38 (7) Time when age attained. The property owner must have attained the age of 60 years by March 39 1 of the year in which the exemption application is filed. 40 (8) Filing applications. Applications for exemption shall be filed in accordance with regulations 41 adopted by the city council and for cause shown. The city assessor may accept and act upon 42 applications received after any established application filing date. 43 (9) Refund. The city assessor is empowered to refund taxes paid by a qualified applicant who is 44 entitled to an exemption and successfully files for the same. 45 (10) Evidence. The city assessor's office shall be authorized to require any applicant to submit 46 evidence substantiating income reported for receipt of the exemption. The city assessor may deny 47 applications where requested income verification is not submitted by the applicant. 48 (11) Denial; appeals. Appeals from d Denial of exemptions by the city assessor and any other 49 complaints regarding the exemption process may be appealed by the taxpayer directly to the 50 board of assessment appeals . The board of assessment appeals shall have the power to affirm, 51 overrule or remand the decision of the city assessor. 52 (12) Interest; retroactive exemptions. Qualified senior citizens who fail to exercise their property tax 53 exemption shall not be entitled to any interest payments on said exemption amount; nor shall 54 unexercised property tax exemptions be retroactive beyond the current tax year. 55 (13) Penalties. Penalties assessed to delinquent property tax accounts that are eligible for a senior 56 citizen exemption that has not been exercised shall not be excused. 57 (14) Council review. City council will review these numbers at the conclusion of each reassessment. 58 ADOPTED: * 59 S:\ORDINANCES\2012\Draft\2012-03 - Chpt 102 - Taxation, Art. VI-Senior Citizen Exemption-FINAL RDG.wpd 60 SYNOPSIS 61 This amendment replaces the language “federal civil service retirement” with “Civil 62 Service Retirement System (CSRS)” and changes the computation of the property 63 owner’s entitlement for the deduction from a dollar amount to a percentage of the 64 Social Security maximum benefit. 65 Actions History 66 March 12, 2012 - Scheduled for Final Reading by Council 67 February 27, 2012 - First Reading Held by Council 68 February 13, 2012 - LF&A Committee Recommended Adoption 69 January 23, 2012 - Referred Back to Staff by the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee