Skip to main content
AskDover

Attachment

Utility Committee. Feb 28, 2011.

Open the PDF

This text was pulled from the PDF automatically and may contain mistakes. The PDF is the official record, so check it before relying on this.

2 pages have little or no readable text here, often scans or drawings. See the PDF for those.

Page 1

UTILITY COMMITTEE AGENDA February 28, 2011 - 5:00 P.M. - Council Chambers - City Hall - City of Dover Public comments are welcomed on any item and will be permitted at appropriate times. When possible, please notify the City Clerk (736-7008 or e-m ail at CityClerk@dover.de.us) should you wish to be recognized. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS 1. Yard Waste Collection Program 2. Generation Revenue Forecast 3. Power Plant FY 2012 Capital Investment Plan (CIP) Review 4. 2012-2016 Utility Capital Investment Plan (CIP) 5. PACE/NAES Monthly Report (December) 6. Adjournment by 5:55 P.M. /tm S:\AGENDAS & MINUTES\Committee-Agendas\2011\02-28-2011 UTILITY.wpd THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.

Page 2

Department of Public Services Yard Waste Separation Plan February 18, 2011

Page 3

BACKGROUND Starting on January 1, 2011, the Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) implemented a ban on yard waste at the Sandtown landfill. Starting July 1, 2011 the DSWA will start enforcing the ban. This ban was a condition of approval from DNREC to operate the landfill. The ban requires all waste haulers to separate out yard waste from the municipal solid waste stream. Haulers have the ability to dump yard waste at the landfill; however, it must be segregated from the municipal solid waste and dumped in a different area. Currently, the tipping fee at the Sandtown landfill for yard waste is the same as municipal solid waste ($72.00 / ton). The City of Dover is not required to dispose of our yard waste at the Sandtown landfill and staff is reviewing options to dispose of this material at other local locations to reduce costs. The separation of yard waste from municipal solid waste will place additional burdens on City staff and our customers. Failure to separate out yard waste will ultimately lead to monetary fines from DNREC; therefore, we need to implement a plan that is customer friendly, cost effective, and produces the required results. We will need to change a number of operational procedures, and we know our customers will be open minded and patient with the changes. This plan has three goals: 1) Comply with the DSWA yard waste ban; 2) Prevent increasing costs to the City of Dover; and 3) Educate our customers on ways to manage their yard waste so that they have a lesser impact on the overall environment and costs to the City. STAFFING & VEHICLES The City of Dover plans to pick up and dispose of yard waste materials using current staffing levels and existing city vehicles, without the need to increase any related costs. Yard waste collection will be provided on a year round basis. CONTAINERS Every property owner, homeowner and/or resident must provide their own private yard waste container to receive service. The maximum container size is 35-gallons. If a customer does not already own the proper size container, they can be purchased affordably at local stores. The following is a list of sample prices found in Dover: ‐ 34-gallon square plastic container with wheels - $18.87 ‐ 35-gallon round (heavy duty) plastic container with wheels - $19.40 ‐ 32-gallon round plastic container without wheels - $13.98 1

Page 4

There is no limit to the number of private yard waste containers that can be set out on a weekly basis for no extra charge. No metal containers will be allowed since they are easily damaged and the city will not reimburse customers for damage to private containers. NEW RULES The City of Dover must adopt a series of new rules to accomplish the separation of yard waste from regular municipal waste in order to avoid fines at the landfill, and to keep our operating costs from increasing. These new rules include the following: 1) All household trash must be bagged and placed into the 95-gallon black container provided by the City. No trash bags will be picked up that are outside of the 95-gallon container. 2) All yard waste material must be placed in a privately owned, 35-gallon or less plastic container. No metal containers will be allowed. The 35-gallon limit is intended to prevent back injuries to our employees from handling containers that are too heavy. 3) Grass clippings, leaves, small shrubs, plants, weeds, small limbs and sticks can all be put in the yard waste container. 4) Only, loose yard waste material can be placed inside of the containers. No plastic or paper bags can be used. The use of bags inside of the yard waste container creates operational problems at the landfill, since the bags need to be opened to demonstrate that nothing is being disposed of that is not allowed in the yard waste section of the landfill. 5) Bulk yard waste (tree limbs, bushes, tree logs, etc) and bulk household trash (furniture, large appliances, rugs, etc) will be collected on alternating weeks. Bulk yard waste will be collected on the same day as recycling. Residents will be allowed to place bulk yard waste at the curbside in an amount not to exceed 4’x4’x8’. Amounts over a single pile of 4’x4’x8’ will be picked up for an extra charge. Small loose limbs must be bundled using biodegradable twine. Large limbs must be cut into lengths less than 8’. 2

Page 5

YEAR ROUND SERVICE SCHEDULES Weekly An unlimited number of yard waste containers, 35-gallon or less in size, will be picked up on a weekly basis, the same day as normal trash collection. Bi-Weekly: – Recycling schedules will remain the same. – Bulk Yard Waste includes large limbs, branches and shrubs that do not fit into the 35-gallon container. Bulk Yard Waste will be collected on the same day as the customer’s recycling. – Bulk Household Waste includes all furniture, carpet, appliances and light construction debris will be collected the week when recycling is not picked up. Seasonal – Leaf Collection will be expanded in an effort to reduce the amount of yard waste that is placed into containers. Leaf collection services will be expanded by adding a second collection season during the month of April, of each year, to allow residents to rake their leaves and dead grass to the curbside for collection. The leaf collection schedule in the fall will remain the same from October 15 to January 15. YARD WASTE REDUCTION STRATEGIES: Through our marketing and public education plan, we will encourage customers to implement waste reduction strategies on their properties. Significant waste reduction is possible through the use of backyard composting and mulching mowers. Landscape planning and other activities can also significantly reduce the amount of yard waste generated from individual properties. Reduction of waste equates to cost savings. 3

Page 6

MARKETING AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PLAN The proposed yard waste separation purpose, schedules, and rules will be communicated with our customers through the Dover City Newsletter, Dover TV, press releases, web and social networking sites, advertisings, billing inserts, brochures, and public events attend by the City’s Public Relations team. In addition, these same venues will be used to education people about composting, mulching mowers blades, and landscaping strategies. We will explore providing some public education seminars on household composting. February 17, 2011 4

Page 7

Generation Revenue Forecast City of Dover March 14, 2011

Page 8

Understanding the cash flow scenarios is critical to long term planning and key tactical decisions PROBLEM DEFINITION Several factors led analyze the cash flow scenarios for the McKee Run and Van Sant • Changing market t structure – PJM RPM auction • PJM reserve margins • Unit age • Plant life assessment findings • Opinion that Units 1 and 2 may have about 5 years of remaining life • Proposed high profile transmission upgrades • Relatively light maintenance prior to new RPM market structure • Unit 1 forced outage • Capacity increases • New generation options Further, understanding when economic retirement is likely supports answering five key questions: • What generation cash flows might Dover reasonably expect to earn? • What should Dover be willing to spend on unit maintenance? • What should Dover be willing to spend in the event of a forced outage? • At what point should a catastrophic failure result in unit retirement? • When might replacement capacity/ PPAs be required? -2- Proprietary & Confidential The Power of Integration

Page 9

Our approach leveraged the generation economic model Pace developed last year APPROACH • Economic Assessment: Develop unit-by-unit projected cash flows based on updated strategic cash flow model developed last year ILLUSTRATIVE UNIT END OF LIFE CASH FLOW, $000 • Forecasted End of Life: Identify point in time where 700 incremental cash is consistently negative 600 • Decision Rule: Estimate remaining unit cash earnings 500 Example: potential at each year to determine maximum willing to pay for Remaining 400 an unplanned repair/ event Unit Cash Flow at Year • Monitoring: Update model as major inputs change (i.e. market 300 2014-15 prices, generation forecast, OPEX/ CAPEX estimates, 200 environmental regulatory changes, etc.) and consider ancillary 100 economic impacts (i.e. water and electric sales) 0 • New questions: 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19 2019‐20 2020‐21 ‐100 – How will insurance rates change post Unit 1 issue? ‐200 – What equipment modifications will the insurance ‐300 company require? What will they cost? ‐400 – How to consider replacement capacity (i.e. W. Deptford, Beasley, etc.)? – Decommissioning cost? – Capacity buy back – low risk, high cost? -3- Proprietary & Confidential The Power of Integration

Page 10

All of Dover units should continue to generate positive cash flows for another 15-20 years barring catastrophic failure BASELINE CASH FLOWS FORECASTED ANNUAL GENERATION CASH FLOWS, $ 8,000,000 • By 2030 Dover could earn a cumulative $55-60 million from 7,000,000 generation 6,000,000 – Cash flows squeezed in later years 5,000,000 as operating and capital expenses rise 4,000,000 • Annual cash flow only negative in 3,000,000 2011-12 2,000,000 – 2011-12 cash flow position results 1,000,000 from capacity prices declining to $110/ MW-day 0 – Without $400k capital contingency 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19 2019‐20 2020‐21 2021‐22 2022‐23 2023‐24 2024‐25 2025‐26 2026‐27 2027‐28 2028‐29 2029‐30 2030‐31 ‐1,000,000 (total across all units) cash flow is ‐2,000,000 slightly positive • Revenues remain highly contingent upon capacity prices and reliable Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 11 operations (low EFORd) Note: analysis assumes a $100k capital contingency charge for each unit; model also assumes all capital is paid for from current year cash -4- Proprietary & Confidential The Power of Integration

Page 11

Generation cash flows should remain positive even if capacity prices fall significantly CAPACITY PRICE SCENARIOS AND IMPACTS FORECASTED CAPACITY PRICES, $/MW-day 300 • The biggest risk to cash flow is declining 250 capacity prices potentially driven by the 200 MAPP project – Capacity prices expected to drop 5% in 2015 150 when the MAPP project online and level off a few years later 100 – DEMEC projects capacity prices will not drop 50 at all • Capacity prices must fall well below ‐ 2010‐11 2011‐12 expectations to turn cash flow negative – A 38% drop in 2015 takes Unit 1 and 2 cash 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19 flows negative in five years 2019‐20 2020‐21 2021‐22 2022‐23 2023‐24 2024‐25 2025‐26 2026‐27 – A 50% drop would d irive Unit 3 cash flows 2027‐28 2028‐29 2029‐30 2030‐31 Base Unit 3 Stress negative immediately Note: analysis assumes a $100k capital contingency charge for each unit; model also assumes all capital is paid for from current year cash -5- Proprietary & Confidential The Power of Integration

Page 12

Cash flows should remain robust even in the event of catastrophic failures CATASTROPHIC FAILURE IMPACTS FORECASTED ANNUAL CASH FLOWS AFTER CATASTROPHIC FAILURE, $ 9,000,000 • A forced outage too expensive to repair is 8,000,000 catastrophic and this represents a high risk impact but low probability risk 7 000 ,000,000 – For Units 1,2, and 11 short term negative cash 6,000,000 flows are quickly recovered in subsequent 5,000,000 years; this is not true for Unit 3 • Quantifiable economics of failure include: 4,000,000 – Foregone revenue 3,000,000 – Requirement to buyback power to replace lost 2,000,000 commitments – Reduced fuel, O&M, and Capital expenses for 1,000,000 the lost unit ‐ – Decommissioning costs 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19 2019‐20 2020‐21 2021‐22 2022‐23 2023‐24 2024‐25 2025‐26 2026‐27 2027‐28 2028‐29 2029‐30 2030‐31 (1,000,000) (2,000,000) Baseline Unit 2 Failure Unit 11 Failure Unit 3 Failure Note: analysis assumes a $100k capital contingency charge for each unit; model also assumes all capital is paid for from current year cash; model assumes capacity buyback at base residual prices; decommissioning costs not included as they are unknown and likely immaterial for this analysis. -6- Proprietary & Confidential The Power of Integration

Page 13

Potential cash flows are strong enough to withstand significant repair expense HOW MUCH COULD YOU BE WILLING TO SPEND TO REPAIR A UNIT? • Conversely – What would you be willing to pay for NET PRESENT VALUE OF LOST OPERATING CASH FLOW the future cash flow? With a three or five year Jan. 1, 2010 Forced Outage, $ million return: ‐ NET PRESENT VALUE OF LOST OPERATING Unit 2 Unit 11 Unit 3 CASH FLOW, $ million (5.00) Payback Unit 1/2 Unit 3 Unit 11 3 year 0.6 7.7 3.0 (10.00) 5 year 1.6 15.3 5.0 – As you approach the end of economic life future (15.00) cash potential diminishes and the amount you will be willing to pay also declines. (20.00) • Key questions: 1 Year NPV 3 Year NPV 5 Year NPV 7 Year NPV – What would cash flow reductions from early unit retirement mean to Dover? ti – How is this risk mitigated today? • Quality maintenance • Capital replacement/ improvement Note: analysis assumes a $100k capital contingency charge for each unit; model • Insurance also assumes all capital is paid for from current year cash; model assumes capacity l buyback at base residual prices; decommissioning costs not included as they are • Reserve funds unknown and likely immaterial for this analysis; applied 6% discount rate. – Is the current mitigation plan sufficient? -7- Proprietary & Confidential The Power of Integration

Page 14

Understanding operational risk impacts and developing mitigation plans NEXT STEPS Monitoring operational risk position • U d pdate model as iprices and expenses h change • Recall that capacity prices are fixed and known for three years forward, still permitting Dover insight into the levels of exposure • Buyback will take place in the incremental not base residual auctions. Historically incremental auction prices have been less than those in the base residual auction, but the gap is l closing. Our model assumes buyback at the base residual price to be conservative. • Older plants such as these will require more frequent small maintenance/ repair • Environmental requirements Evaluate Dover’s risk mitigation plan in event of catastrophic failure • Unit condition monitoring and proactive risk reduction projects, especially for Unit 3 • City’s insurance policies: capital costs, lost business revenue • Reserve/ contingent funds ti • Investment in training and skills • Others -8- Proprietary & Confidential The Power of Integration

Page 15

New projects are highlighted. City of Dover, Delaware DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT Department Project# Priority FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Public Utilities-Power Plant McKee Run Unit 3 Boiler Air Heater #1-EG 2 440,000 440,000 McKee Run Unit 3 Turbine Inspection #2-EG 3 348,000 673,000 1,021,000 Units 1 & 2 Life Extension #3-EG n/a 184,000 52,000 182,000 149,000 22,000 589,000 McKee Run Unit 3 Boiler Systems #4-EG 5 130,000 163,000 97,000 390,000 McKee Run Unit 3 Auxillary System Components #5-EG 4 113,000 143,000 261,000 25,000 542,000 Unit 3 FD & ID Fan Control Damper Upgrade #6-EG 2 92,000 92,000 Unit 3 DCS Computers & Software Upgrades #7-EG 1 85,000 85,000 McKee Run Unit 3 Air Heater Expansion Joint #8-EG n/a 70,000 70,000 Miscellaneous Capital Equipment Relacements #9-EG 1 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 55,000 335,000 McKee Run Demineralizer Control Replacement 10-EG 2 65,000 65,000 Van Sant Unit 11 Component Replacements 11-EG 9 50,000 97,000 143,000 290,000 McKee Run Switchyard Blast Walls 12-EG n/a 50,000 50,000 McKee Run Preservation of Structures 13-EG n/a 38,000 42,000 30,000 110,000 Units 1 & 2 Cooling Tower Life Extension 14-EG 2 25,410 37,260 91,000 75,000 228,670 Unit 3 Cooling Water Line Life Extension 15-EG n/a 25,000 350,000 375,000 McKee Run Unit 3 Stack Repairs 16-EG 1 25,000 50,000 75,000 Unit 3 Cooling Tower Life Extension 17-EG 1 417,390 461,290 878,680 Van Sant Capacity Increase 18-EG n/a 550,000 550,000 McKee Run Units 1 & 2 Stack Repairs 19-EG n/a 75,000 75,000 Van Sant Unit 11 Major Overhaul/Inspection 20-EG n/a 150,000 850,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 McKee Run Hot Water Boilers 21-EG n/a 70,000 70,000 McKee Run Unit 3 High Energy Piping Inspection 22-EG n/a 40,000 360,000 400,000 Metering System Upgrades 23-EG n/a 25,000 125,000 150,000 Units 1 & 2 Boiler Repairs 24-EG n/a 10,000 160,000 170,000 McKee Run Building Equipment Replacement 25-EG n/a 110,000 110,000 Public Utilities-Power Plant Total 1,810,410 2,180,650 1,839,290 1,736,000 1,595,000 9,161,350 GRAND TOTAL 1,810,410 2,180,650 1,839,290 1,736,000 1,595,000 9,161,350 Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 16

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # #1-EG Project Name McKee Run Unit 3 Boiler Air Heater Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 2 New Project: Yes Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $440,000 This project will perform the needed replacement of the boiler air heater casing, internal components, and structural members which were identified during a planned unit inspection in October 2010. These repairs are required to prevent further deterioration of the air heater structure, maintain the integrity of the air heater casing, and continued availability of the boiler to be dispatched for generation. Justification This project will be performed concurrently with other maintenance activities scheduled during the planned maintenance outage period. Delaying this project will result in further deterioration of boiler performance and could result in the failure of the air heater and subsequent unit forced out of service with loss of generation for an extended period of time. Would expect this project to be funded outside the normal operating budget. This project will be scheduled to take place during the spring of 2012 to coincide with the planned outage of Unit 3. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Construction/Maintenance 350,000 350,000 Miscellaneous 90,000 90,000 Total 440,000 440,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 440,000 440,000 Total 440,000 440,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 17

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # #2-EG Project Name McKee Run Unit 3 Turbine Inspection Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Services Director Category Electric Priority 3 New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $1,209,000 This project will inspect turbine, generator, and auxiliary equipment to determine repairs needed to keep the unit operational and to assess remaining life of the unit. Assess repair quotes, if repairs are needed, to determine best available options. This project will be completed in two phases, an initial limited inspection followed by an extensive detailed inspection and repair planned outage. The first phase will utilize borescope equipment to determine condition of components that can be observed through limited access locations along the turbine casing and through turbine inlet valve/s. This inspection will provide a general condition assessment of a portion of the highly stress components of the turbine and may provide insight into the extent of replacement parts needed to successfully execute phase 2. Phase 2 to be completed one year later will include a full disassembly and inspection of the turbine and auxiliary equipment and a limited disassembly of the Generator. Added scope items to 2016- minor turbine inspections-$160,000 and 2017 condenser vacuum pump refurbishments-$28,000. Scheduled for spring of 2011 for phase 1 and spring of 2012 for phase 2. This project was previously in the 5 year plan as a 2014 project. The project price is an estimated cost based on budgetary vendor pricing and does not include the cost of any major turbine component parts. Justification An assessment of the unit needs to be performed to determine condition of the highly stressed turbine components to assure continued reliability. Documented condition of rotor blading during last inspection noted deterioration of 9th stage blades and temporary repairs performed. A significant probability that the blades should be replaced. Additionally, high pressure rotor bore has never been inspected and should be performed per industry standards. Consequences of delaying or eliminating this project include possible catastrophic equipment failure and indefinite loss of unit availability. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Construction/Maintenance 256,000 467,000 723,000 188,000 Other 32,000 111,000 143,000 Total Miscellaneous 60,000 95,000 155,000 Total 348,000 673,000 1,021,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Electric I & E Fund 348,000 673,000 1,021,000 188,000 Total 348,000 673,000 1,021,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 18

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # #3-EG Project Name Units 1 & 2 Life Extension Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $2,453,000 Replace or procure capital equipment. Equipment includes the following: 2011-Turbine valve and first stage inspection-$170k, Oil lubricating system components- $10k 2012 – ID/FD fans and motors-$114,000, Boiler feed pumps and motors- $22,000 2012 - Condensate pumps and motors-$20k, K Heater level controllers-$20k, Circulating water pump motor-$8k 2013 - Boiler Inspection -$150k, condensate pumps and motors-$20k, Circulating water pump and motor-$32k 2014 – Boiler major inspection- $150k, Circulating water pump and motor-$32k 2015 – Main steam piping inspection and pipe hanger repairs-$105k, Boiler feed pump and motors-$44k 2016 – Boiler feed pumps and motors-$22k Beyond 2016- Major turbine/generator inspections-$1400k, Feed pump recirculation valves-$60k, FD fan motor -$12k, Steam air heater coils- $50,000, condensate pump and motor-$80k, Circulating water pumps and motor-$82k Justification This project is required to fund the replace of capital items that are expected to reach their useful life in 2011 to 2014 and will need to be replaced to maintain plant system and unit reliability. Extended equipment and /or unit outage time will result from lack of funding this project. This will have a direct effect on the cost of energy during the extended outage time as well as increase future energy capacity charges. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future 180,000 Construction/Maintenance 184,000 52,000 182,000 149,000 22,000 589,000 1,684,000 Total Total 184,000 52,000 182,000 149,000 22,000 589,000 Total Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future 180,000 Electric I & E Fund 184,000 52,000 182,000 149,000 22,000 589,000 1,684,000 Total Total 184,000 52,000 182,000 149,000 22,000 589,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 19

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # #4-EG Project Name McKee Run Unit 3 Boiler Systems Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 5 New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $962,000 This project will perform inspections of boiler systems to evaluate the remaining life of critical boiler and supporting system components. Subsequent to those inspections, repair/ replacement costs will be developed for the major boiler components. Additionally, major critical equipment of supporting systems which have already been identified as needing replacement or refurbishment will be addressed in this project. Major equipment includes the following: Boiler, ID and FD fans and motors, boosted overfire air fan and motor. Equipment repairs added to this project beyond 2016, include major boiler inspection, chemical cleaning and repairs to air heater. This is a multi-year project beginning in 2012 and continuing into 2017. In general, most work activities will require planned outages and therefore will be scheduled to coincide with planned outages. Justification Critical system equipment represent components that, if they fail, will result in lose of generation and or capacity. Identifying the condition of critical components will allow for proper prioritization of maintenance activities and resources. Delaying this project could result in the failure of critical unit equipment and subsequent loss of generation and or capacity. More importantly, component failure could also result in safety risk to personnel This project will performed concurrently with several other projects intended to determine the condition of the all McKee Run Unit 3 critical equipment. Reference McKee Run Unit 3 Turbine Inspection Project and McKee Run Unit 3 Auxiliary System Component Project. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Construction/Maintenance 90,000 113,000 87,000 290,000 572,000 Other 10,000 15,000 25,000 Total Miscellaneous 30,000 35,000 10,000 75,000 Total 130,000 163,000 97,000 390,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Electric I & E Fund 130,000 163,000 97,000 390,000 572,000 Total 130,000 163,000 97,000 390,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 20

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # #5-EG Project Name McKee Run Unit 3 Auxillary System Components Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 4 New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $598,000 This project will perform inspections and repairs of Unit auxiliary system components that have been identified as critical through the plant life assessment study. Critical auxiliary systems components are those components that could result in unit load reduction or outage with consequential loss of capacity and / or generating although they would not individually affect the long range financial viability of the unit. Components identified include Boiler feed pumps and motors, condensate pumps and motors, circulating water pumps and motors, feedwater heater #5. This project captures the costs of the replacement/ refurbishment multiple components.This is a multi-year project beginning in 2012 and continuing into 2015. Justification Critical system components that, if they fail, will result in loss of generation and or capacity. Addressing these assets in a systematic fashion will result in minimizing forced outages and eliminating major maintenance expenses associated with component failure. Performing work work as scheduled will also levelize maintenance expenditures. Delaying this project could result in the failure of critical unit equipment and subsequent lose of generation and or capacity. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Construction/Maintenance 75,000 80,000 130,000 24,000 309,000 56,000 Other 3,000 6,000 6,000 1,000 16,000 Total Miscellaneous 35,000 57,000 125,000 217,000 Total 113,000 143,000 261,000 25,000 542,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Electric I & E Fund 113,000 143,000 261,000 25,000 542,000 56,000 Total 113,000 143,000 261,000 25,000 542,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 21

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # #6-EG Project Name Unit 3 FD & ID Fan Control Damper Upgrade Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 2 New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $92,000 Replace the 8 existing pneumatic Forced Draft (FD) & Induced Draft (ID) Fan control & isolation operators with electric drive operators. Justification To have a more repeatable control of the fan control damper position and a more reliable controller. Extreme weather conditions have affected the operability and repeatability of these large pneumatic controllers. Additionally, parts for the existing controllers are becoming hard to find. The electric drive operators will not be affected by weather and they will provide repeatable control with far less hysteresis than the pneumatic drives. This will provide greater capability to tune the boiler combustion process resulting in improved unit efficiency and stack emissions. Completing this project will result in a more reliable system that will improve the efficiency of the fans and boiler and will help ensure compliance with our current air permits. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Miscellaneous 92,000 92,000 Total 92,000 92,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 92,000 92,000 Total 92,000 92,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 22

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # #7-EG Project Name Unit 3 DCS Computers & Software Upgrades Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 1 New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $85,000 This project will replace the 7 existing Digital Control System (DCS) computers (servers-4, clients-2 and logic developer-1) and upgrade the ABB software that is being used to control the Boiler Master/ Electro Hydraulic Control (EHC) System and the Burner Management System that are located in Unit 3 control room (clients) and in the Net 90 control room (server and logic developer). This will ensure that when Unit 3 is called upon to operate that the plants staff will be able to start on bring Unit 3 on line with no outages. The project is estimated to be completed in 2012. The computer and ABB controls upgrade would allow the system to operate faster and be more reliable. Additionally, life cycle of these computer systems is typically 5 to 6 years. Justification The DCS computers were installed in March of 2003 as part of the Over-Fired Air Project. These computers are in service 24/7 and due to their run time and the life expectancy of the computers, the need to change out the computer and upgrade the ABB control system is consistent with COD IT protocol of changing out computers after five years. By upgrading the computers and the control software, the plant will have a more reliable system. Included in the software upgrade is an improvement in the redundancy of the EHC Computers. Due to the age of the computers, one of the computers could crash resulting in Unit 3 not be available to run when called upon. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Miscellaneous 85,000 85,000 Total 85,000 85,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 85,000 85,000 Total 85,000 85,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 23

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # #8-EG Project Name McKee Run Unit 3 Air Heater Expansion Joint Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: Yes Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $205,000 This project will replace the Unit 3 boiler air heater, hot air outlet expansion joint which has reached the end of its’ useful life. During Unit 3 operations in August of 2010, a thermographic survey detected multiple cracks in this expansion joint. The work is scheduled to be completed in the spring of 2011. The added expansion joint replacements will be scheduled for 2012 (air heater hot gas inlet ) and 2016 (air heater hot gas outlet). Justification This expansion joint has failed in multiple locations, allowing hot air to escape from the ductwork going to the boiler. This has a direct impact on the performance of the Unit, limiting capacity and reducing efficiency. Replacement of this expansion joint is necessary in order to recover unit efficiency. This project will be implemented in 2011 and be completed in 2017. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future 65,000 Construction/Maintenance 70,000 70,000 70,000 Total Total 70,000 70,000 Total Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future 65,000 Electric I & E Fund 70,000 70,000 70,000 Total Total 70,000 70,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 24

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # #9-EG Project Name Miscellaneous Capital Equipment Relacements Type Equipment Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 1 New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $486,000 Replace or procure capital equipment valued between $5,000 and $25,000. Equipment includes the following: Fiscal 2011- cooling water booster pumps- $20k, Control valves- $15k, Unit 1 boiler feed pump-25k, boiler safety and control valves-$16k Fiscal 2012- Station critical pumps and motors-$40k, cooling tower fan drives- $6k, HVAC and process Equipment motors and breakers-$10k, minor boiler tube repairs-$14k Fiscal 2013- #1 and #3 elevator mechanical components-20k, Units 1,2 and 3 Pilot gas piping and instrumentation component inspections- $50,000, Fiscal 2014 - Station critical pumps and motors- $20k, Boiler system safety and control valves -$30,000, minor boiler tube repairs-$20 Items listed above are not inclusive of all years but represent the first several years of the project. Justification This project is required to fund the replace of capital items that are expected to reach their useful life in 2011 and beyond that have not been identified in other Capital projects and will need to be replaced to maintain plant system and unit reliability. Extended equipment and /or unit outage time will result from lack of funding this project. This will have a direct effect on the cost of energy during the extended outage time as well as increase future energy capacity charges. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future 71,000 Miscellaneous 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 55,000 335,000 80,000 Total Total 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 55,000 335,000 Total Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future 71,000 Electric I & E Fund 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 55,000 335,000 80,000 Total Total 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 55,000 335,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 25

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 10-EG Project Name McKee Run Demineralizer Control Replacement Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 2 New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $65,000 This project will replace the existing demineralizer control system with a state of the art solid state programmable controller. Replacement to be completed in 2012. The system has been reliable over its operating life, but parts are getting harder to find, and maintenance of the system controls is increasing. The cost identified assumes the replacement of the controls only. Justification The existing demineralizer system is a 1960’s vintage. Replacing of the existing controls on the system would improve reliability. Replacement parts for our current system are becoming obsolete and hard to locate. If we were to have a major problem with the demineralizer system, it could impact the unit run time and could result in a forced outage. Repairs requiring an extended outage of the demineralizer system would require having a portable demineralizer brought in and temporarily hooked up until the repairs were made and the system put back in service. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Construction/Maintenance 65,000 65,000 Total 65,000 65,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 65,000 65,000 Total 65,000 65,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 26

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 11-EG Project Name Van Sant Unit 11 Component Replacements Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Plant Manager Category Electric Priority 9 -- New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $1,340,000 Replace or procure capital equipment valued between $5,000 and $25,000. Equipment includes the following: Process equipment motors (2012) - $22k (2014) - $7k Station critical system pumps and blowers (2012) - $15k and (2014) - $30k Cooling/Circulating Water pumps and motors (2012) - $13k and (2014) - $10k Rebuild of Black Start- Starting Diesel Engine (2014) - $30k Air Intake System Filtration System (2014) - $20k 2016- Generator , stack, and lube oil pump inspections-$140k Beyond 2016- combustion and hot gas path inspections- $1,050k Justification This project is required to fund the replace of capital items that are expected to reach their useful life in 2012 and beyond and will need to be replaced or refurbished to maintain plant system and unit reliability. Extended equipment and /or unit outage time will result from lack of funding this project. This will have a direct effect on the cost of energy during the extended outage time as well as increase future energy capacity charges. This project will be implemented in 2012 and continue through 2016. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Construction/Maintenance 50,000 97,000 143,000 290,000 1,050,000 Total 50,000 97,000 143,000 290,000 Total Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Electric I & E Fund 50,000 97,000 143,000 290,000 1,050,000 Total 50,000 97,000 143,000 290,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 27

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EG Project Name McKee Run Switchyard Blast Walls Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Plant Manager Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: Yes Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $50,000 This project will install blast walls between the auxiliary transformers in the McKee Run Switchyard. There is a possibility, if the walls are built, there may be a reduction in insurance premium costs, but that cost is undetermined at this time. Recommendation from the insurance company to install blast walls between our transformers. In addition, safety of personnel working in the plant and that of the citizens living outside the plant perimeter could be affected by flying debris. There is a possibility, if the walls are built, there may be a reduction in insurance premium costs, but that cost is undetermined at this time. Justification Per NFPA, outdoor oil-insulated transformers should be separated from adjacent structures and from each other by firewalls, spatial separation, or other approved means for the purpose of limiting the damage and potential spread of fire from a transformer failure. There is a greater risk of damage to equipment the longer the project is delayed. If damage occurs there will be high replacement/repair costs of the affected transformers, high possibility of lost revenue from Units 1 and 2 generation, and an increase in City of Dover budget in terms of having to purchase additional capacity due to the loss of the generating capacity of Units 1 and 2. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 10,000 10,000 Construction/Maintenance 40,000 40,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 28

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 13-EG Project Name McKee Run Preservation of Structures Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Plant Manager Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $110,000 This project includes sandblasting and painting the plant structures along with the retirement of equipment placed out of service. This work will be completed over several fiscal year budgets starting in 2012 and completing in 2014 Justification Structural steel painting is needed in various areas throughout the plant proper as well as various outbuildings on the plant property to maintain the physical building structures and equipment in an acceptable condition and prevent further deterioration. This project represents a minimum preservation and maintenance of structures consistent with the expected life of the station. Consequences of delaying or eliminating this project will result in the acceleration of deterioration of plant structures and larger future costs associated with strutual repairs. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Construction/Maintenance 38,000 42,000 30,000 110,000 Total 38,000 42,000 30,000 110,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 38,000 42,000 30,000 110,000 Total 38,000 42,000 30,000 110,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 29

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 14-EG Project Name Units 1 & 2 Cooling Tower Life Extension Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 2 New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $477,400 This project will repair the cooling tower decking, mechanical and internal structure on Unit 1 and 2 Cooling Tower. This is significantly important to the upcoming discharge limit that is being proposed by the Delaware River Basin Committee (DRBC). Note: The project scope added refurbishment of fans, motors and drives in FY 2016 and 2017. This repair/replacement work will extend the service life of the tower a minimum of ten years. Justification The cooling tower decking has reached its serviceable life and is in need of immediate replacement in order to maintain its current thermal efficiency as well as its structural integrity. Continued deterioration of the tower will effect unit performance and will limit the unit full load capability. In order to extend the life of the plant, these repairs/ replacements will be required. Additionally this will aid in meeting the discharge temperature limitations that is being actively sought by the DRBC (Delaware river Basin Commission). The integrity of the cooling tower decking and main structure frame work has become an issue. Continued deterioration of the cooling tower wood members and fan decking could result in an employee related accident or equipment failure. Also continued deterioration of the cooling tower performance will lead to load reductions on the unit during periods of high ambient temperatures. This will occur during the time period when generation costs are at their peak. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future 173,730 Miscellaneous 25,410 37,260 91,000 75,000 228,670 75,000 Total Total 25,410 37,260 91,000 75,000 228,670 Total Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future 173,730 Electric I & E Fund 25,410 37,260 91,000 75,000 228,670 75,000 Total Total 25,410 37,260 91,000 75,000 228,670 Total Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 30

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 15-EG Project Name Unit 3 Cooling Water Line Life Extension Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Plant Manager Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $375,000 This project will inspect and repair the underground cooling water line from the Unit 3 condenser to the cooling tower. A condition assessment and life evaluation will be performed on this pipe in 2012 to develop a repair/replace action plan to address the suitability for continued operation as well as extending the life of the piping beyond 2015. The actual repairs will be completed in 2014. We would expect this project to be funded outside the normal operating budget. Completion of the project as scheduled will eliminate the need to add additional O&M funding for emergency repairs in future years. The condition assessment will be completed in 2012with the repair/construction work to be completed in 2014. The results of the condition assessment will determine what action plan will be developed. The budgeted costs assume repairs of the lines (2) from the cooling tower to the plant exterior wall. Justification The condition of the underground cooling water line has required numerous repairs over the life of the plant and is expected to reach its useful life in the 2012-2015 time period. It is expected that the repair frequency will accelerate over the next several years as the internal pipe coating continues to degrade. Delaying this project beyond 2014 will increase the risk of a failure causing an extended unit outage to repair or replace the failed pipe as well incur water spillage to the ground. Additional budget dollars will need to be allocated to repair/ replace sections of piping. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 25,000 25,000 Miscellaneous 350,000 350,000 Total 25,000 350,000 375,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 25,000 350,000 375,000 Total 25,000 350,000 375,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 31

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 16-EG Project Name McKee Run Unit 3 Stack Repairs Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 1 New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $75,000 An inspection will be made and assessment will be made from the inspection to determine the remaining life of the stack and also provide cost of any repairs required to extend the life of the stack for 15 to 20 yrs. Repairs to the stack lining and exterior will be made in order to allow continued operation of Unit 3. A determination for the necessity of repairs to Unit 3 stack will be performed on an annual basis. An internal and external inspection will be performed by outside consultant in 2012. Justification Current plans are to contract for an external and internal inspection in 2012 to develop an action plan to extend the life of the stack as well as develop costs for the repairs of the stack by outside contractors. We will perform in-house inspections of the stack on an annual basis until 2015 at which time we will contract for needed repairs as determined by the 2012 and subsequent yearly inspections. Delaying necessary repairs could lead to more costly repairs in the future, unplanned forced outage on Unit 3, fall out of internal material upon the surrounding community and potential injury to employees. Earnings from the sale of capacity may also be affected. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Miscellaneous 25,000 50,000 75,000 Total 25,000 50,000 75,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 25,000 50,000 75,000 Total 25,000 50,000 75,000 Budget Impact/Other Due to the reduced operation of Unit 3, the plan is to inspect the stack in fiscal year 2012. The repair portion of the project has been moved out to fiscal year 2014 /15. The plan is to perform regular assessments of the internal condition to the stack, then determine when repairs may be necessary. Severe damage may move the repairs to an earlier date however the reduced run time of Unit 3 may afford an ability to postpone repairs to a later date. Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 32

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 17-EG Project Name Unit 3 Cooling Tower Life Extension Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 1 New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $1,277,018 This project will repair the cooling tower decking, mechanical and internal structure on Unit 3 Cooling Tower. The repairs/replacements include a new design on Unit 3 Cooling Tower to improve heat transfer and assure that the discharge temperature of the cooling tower continues to meet regulatory requirements. This is significantly important to the upcoming discharge limit that is being proposed by the Delaware River Basin Committee (DRBC). Inspection of the tower was completed in 2009. Engineering and bid cycle to be completed in 2010 within the operations budget. The installation work to be completed in 2012 and 2013. This repair / replacement work will extend the service life of the towers five to ten years. Justification The cooling tower is nearing the end of life its serviceable life and is expected to impact the cooling tower performance to an extent that it will also affect unit performance and will limit the unit full load capability. In order to extend the life of the plant, these repairs/ replacements will be required as well as aid in meeting the discharge temperature limitations that is being actively sought by the DRBC. The integrity of the cooling tower decking and main structure frame work has become an issue. Continued deterioration of the cooling tower wood members and fan decking could result in an employee related accident or equipment failure. Also continued deterioration of the cooling tower performance will lead to load reductions on the unit during periods of high ambient temperatures. This will occur during the time period when generation costs are at their peak. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 398,338 Construction/Maintenance 417,390 461,290 878,680 Total Total 417,390 461,290 878,680 Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 398,338 Electric I & E Fund 417,390 461,290 878,680 Total Total 417,390 461,290 878,680 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 33

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 18-EG Project Name Van Sant Capacity Increase Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Plant Manager Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: Yes Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $550,000 This project will increase the electric generation output of the VanSant Unit 11 gas turbine generator by installing technology specifically designed to decrease the air inlet temperatures to the gas turbine during high ambient air temperature days. This project is dependent on obtaining favorable payback as determined by an evaluation of available technologies conducted as part of a strategically budgeted initiative that will determine the most cost effective technology to utilize. This initiative is contained in the 2012 Strategic level of the Power Plant O&M budget. The project is estimated to be completed in 2013. Multiple technologies to achieve the increased generator output will be evaluated in 2012 Justification This project will provide a positive cash flow within 5 years of installation as the City of Dover will benefit through additional capacity and generation sales. Each year this project is delayed will result in lost revenue opportunity to the City of Dover. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 75,000 75,000 Construction/Maintenance 475,000 475,000 Total 550,000 550,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 550,000 550,000 Total 550,000 550,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 34

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 19-EG Project Name McKee Run Units 1 & 2 Stack Repairs Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life 15-20 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $75,000 Repairs to the stack lining and exterior will be made in order allow continued operation of these units. In addition, an assessment will be made to determine the remaining life of the stack and also provide cost of any repairs required to extend the life of the stack for another 15 to 20 yrs. Due to the reduced operation of Units 1 & 2, the project has been moved out to fiscal year 2013. Plans to perform regular assessments of the internal damage to the common stack will determine when future repairs may be necessary. Severe damage may move the repairs to an earlier date however the reduced run time of Units 1 & 2 may continue to afford the plant the ability to postpone repairs to a later date past the proposed. The current expectation is to perform the repairs in fiscal year 2013. A determination for the necessity of repairs to Units 1 & 2 common stack will be performed on an annual basis. An internal and external inspection will be performed by outside consultant in 2011. Justification Current plans are to perform in-house inspections of the stack on an annual basis and to contract the repairs of the stack by outside contractors. Delaying necessary repairs could lead to more costly repairs in the future, simultaneous unplanned forced outages on both Units 1 & 2, fall out of internal material upon the surrounding community and potential injury to employees. Earnings from the sale of capacity may also be affected. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Miscellaneous 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 35

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 20-EG Project Name Van Sant Unit 11 Major Overhaul/Inspection Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $2,000,000 This project will perform major overhaul on unit due to OEM recommended repair frequency based on factored starts of the unit from first commissioning and from last inspection/repair interval. This project will be implemented in 2014 with long lead material purchases and installation in 2016. Justification This project is required to fund the purchase of all parts needed to perform a major overhaul on the unit based on estimated factored starts since unit was first commissioned and since last the Hot Gas Path. This project will span the course of two years. In Year 1, the majority of the parts will be purchased and services will be lined up for the actual installation on the unit in Year 2. Extended equipment and /or unit outage time will result from lack of funding this project. This will have a direct effect on the cost of energy during the extended outage time as well as increase future energy capacity charges. In addition, gradual degradation of the unit’s output could occur which would have a negative effect on the capacity rating of the unit and could result in catastrophic failure of the unit. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 100,000 50,000 150,000 Construction/Maintenance 600,000 600,000 Other 100,000 100,000 Miscellaneous 150,000 750,000 250,000 1,150,000 Total 150,000 850,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 150,000 850,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 Total 150,000 850,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 36

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 21-EG Project Name McKee Run Hot Water Boilers Type Equipment Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $70,000 This project will replace the 2 existing hot water boilers with smaller more efficient (90 percent or better) boilers. This project will tie in the Units 1 and 2 plant heating system to the hot water system. This project was originally set up for 2011. The plant Hot water boilers would only be supplying heat to the plant. The existing hot water boilers are 36 yrs old and have an efficiency of less than 85%. Justification A result of the conversion from residual to distillate oil as part of the pollution remediation project, the existing hot water boilers will no longer be needed to heat oil. Therefore the only load on the hot water system will be for plant heating. The existing hot water boilers are grossly oversized for this application and not suited for this seasonal operating mode. Additionally, the boilers are 36 years old and approaching end of life. Replacing the existing boilers with properly sized boilers will reduce costs on monthly gas usage and reduced maintenance on existing boilers. Installing more efficient boilers will also result in reducing the carbon footprint of the plant. The boilers are approaching end of life and are requiring more frequent maintenance. Repalcing these in 2014 will reduce the potential for experiencing system outages and more expensive repairs. Additionally, the sooner we replace the current boilers with the more efficient units the sooner we will realize payback on investment. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Miscellaneous 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 37

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 22-EG Project Name McKee Run Unit 3 High Energy Piping Inspection Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $400,000 This project will develop and implement a high energy piping inspection program for the Unit 3 piping systems. Included will be the main steam, hot and cold reheat lines as well as feed water and condensate piping. This program is intended to prevent any long term stress or flow induced pipe failures from occurring. Program development will be completed in the fall of 2014. The inspections will be completed during the spring 2015 planned outage. Justification High energy piping systems are subject to service related structural failure due to the high temperature service under which they operate. Additionally, lower temperature piping systems are subject to accelerated corrosion rates due to flow characteristics. Identifying any such piping before failures occur will prevent extended forced outage to make emergency repairs/replacement. Delaying this project could result in the failure of critical piping systems and subsequent lose of generation and or capacity. More importantly, component failure could also result in safety risk to personnel. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 40,000 40,000 80,000 Construction/Maintenance 280,000 280,000 Other 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 360,000 400,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 40,000 360,000 400,000 Total 40,000 360,000 400,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 38

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 23-EG Project Name Metering System Upgrades Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: Yes Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $150,000 : This project involves the replacement of all the meters (15) in the COD system that are currently tied to the metering computer at McKee Run Generating Station. In addition, costs associated with the replacement of the Metering computer (PC) at McKee Run and an alternate demark for the telephone line that the NRG meter uses to communicate data to the McKee Run computer is included in this project. A metering computer would also be installed at the City of Dover dispatch center for use. At the present time, there are annual maintenance costs associated with keeping the reliability of the meters and the metering software current. In addition, a software maintenance fee is included in the annual budget. Justification The meters are 14 years old and the metering computer is 4 years old and nearing the end of their recommended service life. The metering system provides the City of Dover, PaceGlobal, NAES, PJM, NRG and Delmarva Power with accurate data for revenue metering, cost metering, load scheduling and forecasting and for generator capacity rating verification purposes. Submission of this data/information is also an important part of compliance with various NERC standards. Non-compliance with NERC Standards could result in fines and other penalties. Delaying or eliminating this project could have a substantial effect on the City of Dover Electrical bill. Failures to the meters or computers would force the City of Dover to rely on DPL metering, NRG metering and/or other methods of determining load usage costs and generation revenues. In addition, costs associated with the manual documentation and submission of the information would be labor intensive and could become extremely costly. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 25,000 25,000 Construction/Maintenance 125,000 125,000 Total 25,000 125,000 150,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 25,000 125,000 150,000 Total 25,000 125,000 150,000 Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 39

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 24-EG Project Name Units 1 & 2 Boiler Repairs Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: Yes Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $365,000 This project will replace certain boiler components on units 1 and 2 boilers. Equipment to be addressed include the following: FD and ID fan damper drives – 2016-$90,000 Air Heater Inlet and outlet expansion joints – 2016- $60,000 FD fan expansion joint – 2019- $60,000 Boiler exit expansion joint -2019- $60,000 Replace air heater Baskets -2020-$75,000 Air heater cleaning -2015 - $10,000, 2016 - $10,00 This project will be implemented in 2015 and continue into 2020. This project would be funded outside of the normal O&M budget. Should result in reduced risk of increasing maintenance budget in the future. Justification This project is required to fund the replacement of capital items that are expected to reach their useful life in 2016 and beyond. This equipment is associated with the boiler gas flow system and the condition of these items is critical to the efficient operation of the boilers. A continuous deterioration of unit performance, both generation output and capacity, will occur from lack of funding this project. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Construction/Maintenance 10,000 160,000 170,000 195,000 Total 10,000 160,000 170,000 Total Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Electric I & E Fund 10,000 160,000 170,000 195,000 Total 10,000 160,000 170,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 40

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 25-EG Project Name McKee Run Building Equipment Replacement Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities-Power Plant Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: Yes Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $215,000 This project includes the replacement of certain building support systems along with the paving of roadways around the cooling towers at the McKee Run Generating station. The specific building systems to be addressed include: Supervisors Office Roof top Air Conditioners – 2016-$30,000 Control Room rooftop air Conditioning Unit – 2017 - $50,000 Administrative Building roof top Air Conditioner -2020 -$30,000 Rebuild #1 elevator – 2019-$25,000 Pave roadway around cooling towers and tank berm -2016- $80,000 This project will be implemented in 2016 and complete in 2020 This project is expected to be funding outside the normal O&M budget. It should result in reducing the risk of increased maintenance budget in the future. Justification This project is required to fund the replacement of roof top air conditioners that are expected to reach their useful life starting in 2016. In addition, the #1 elevator is expected to require significant rebuilding to maintain it’s reliability. Major maintenance was performed last in 1999. The roadway around the cooling towers is expected to need major repair due to damage resulting from heavy vehicle and construction equipment traffic associated with the cooling tower repairs scheduled for 2011 through 2015. Continuing increase in the costs to maintain this equipment will result from the lack of funding this project. In addition, critical temperature control is necessary to keep plant instrumentation located in the control room at acceptable operating conditions. Allowing the temperature to exceed design conditions could contribute to reduced control equipment life and possible reduced unit reliability. Maintaining the roadway access to the cooling towers and oil tank area is critical to being able to respond to emergencies at those locations. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Construction/Maintenance 110,000 110,000 105,000 Total 110,000 110,000 Total Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Electric I & E Fund 110,000 110,000 105,000 Total 110,000 110,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Page 41

New Projects are highlighted. City of Dover, Delaware DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT Department Project# Priority FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Public Utilities- Electric Eng Substation PT & CT Replacement 12-EE1101 5 267,715 267,715 Lighting Project and Rehabilitation 12-EE1103 4 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Equipment Replacement 12-EE1192 3 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Generataor Replacement 12-EE1290 2 50,000 50,000 Frazier Substation Reliability Upgrade 12-EE1291 9 155,000 610,247 765,247 Distribution Feeder Replacement Program 12-EE1292 8 277,510 277,510 277,510 277,510 277,510 1,387,550 Distribution Capacitors and Controls 12-EE1293 10 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Transmission Line Maintenance Program 12-EE1294 7 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 SCADA Master Hardware Replacement 12-EE1596 6 75,000 75,000 Distribution Upgrades 12-EV1101 1 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Outage Management & Automatic Voice Reponse 13-EE1390 n/a 250,000 250,000 69 kV Substation Switch Replacement 13-EE1391 n/a 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Horsepond Substation Reliability Upgrade 13-EE1392 n/a 170,000 591,812 761,812 Division Street Substation Fence 13-EE1595 n/a 70,000 70,000 General Scott Switchgear 14-EE1490 n/a 800,000 300,000 1,100,000 Horsepond to Cartanza 69 kV Rebuild 15-EE1590 n/a 330,467 330,467 System Automation 15-EE1591 n/a 300,000 150,000 450,000 69 kV Cable Replacement North Street 15-EE1593 n/a 85,000 480,710 565,710 System Operations Monitoring 15-EE1594 n/a 30,000 30,000 McKee Run Yard Rebuild 16-EE1592 n/a 450,000 450,000 Public Utilities- Electric Eng Total 1,590,225 2,222,757 2,514,322 2,167,977 2,123,220 10,618,501 Public Utilities-Electric T&D New Developments 12-EE1111 1 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 3,000,000 Public Utilities-Electric T&D Total 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 3,000,000 GRAND TOTAL 2,190,225 2,822,757 3,114,322 2,767,977 2,723,220 13,618,501 Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 42

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EE1101 Project Name Substation PT & CT Replacement Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 5 New Project: No Account Number: 487-8300-563.70-27 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $784,813 This project replaces aging metering/system protection equipment in the older substations. The equipment to be replaced measures the line voltage and current which is then interpreted by the relays for system protection. Additionally, the lightning arrestors will be replaced which protects the equipment during lightning strikes. This is the final year of a three year project. Justification This equipment has a normal 30-year life and has exceeded that in all of our substations except the newest substations. By replacing the equipment during normal scheduled maintenance shut downs, it will prevent larger outages due to equipment failure. Such equipment has caused large outages by faulting due to its age. Additionally, many of the current components have not been tested for PCB’s which could result in expensive cleanup charges should they fail. Materials to be ordered in September 2011. Equipment will start arriving in the spring 2012 and be installed during the regular scheduled substation maintenance schedules until the project is completed. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 517,098 Construction/Maintenance 267,715 267,715 Total Total 267,715 267,715 Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 517,098 Electric I & E Fund 267,715 267,715 Total Total 267,715 267,715 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 43

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EE1103 Project Name Lighting Project and Rehabilitation Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 10-12 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 4 New Project: No Account Number: 487-8300-563.50-76 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $650,000 This fund was developed to replace and repair existing street lights or install new lights upon customer request. This fund will remain active as long as there are improvements to be made. Private area lighting requests are a source of revenue for the City. Areas completed are Greens of Dover, Farmview, Twelve Oaks, Old Mill Acres I, White Oak Apartments, Westfield, Fairview, Cranberry Run, Millcreek, Independence Village and Governors Avenue (South 100 Block), Deerfield, Central Middle School, Fox Hall, Hidden Oaks, and a portion of North Governors Ave. Areas to be completed this budget year include The Meadows, Turnberry, Baltray, Acorn Farms, Bicentennial and some improvements to The Green. Justification The Electric Division receives numerous requests for lighting improvements. These requests are due to the lights aging, and as they age they put out less light and become unreliable. There are many developments that are in need of street light improvements. This fund would also provide funding for new large security light requests. Consequences of delaying or eliminating this project include constant complaints of poor street lighting and multiple failures due to antiquated lights. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 400,000 Construction/Maintenance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Total Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 400,000 Electric I & E Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Total Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 44

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EE1192 Project Name Equipment Replacement Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 3 New Project: No Account Number: 487-8300-563.70-27 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $280,000 Replacement of capital equipment valued between $5,000 and $25,000. Justification Extended equipment and/or unit outage time will result from lack of funding this project. This will have a direct effect on the cost of energy during the extended outage time as well as increase future energy capacity charges. This project is required to fund the replacement of capital items that are expected to reach their useful life and will need to be replaced to maintain system reliability Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 80,000 Equip/Vehicle/Furnishings 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Total Total 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 80,000 Electric I & E Fund 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Total Total 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 45

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EE1290 Project Name Generataor Replacement Type Equipment Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 15-20 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 2 New Project: No Account Number: 487-8300-563.40-25 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $50,000 Replace the existing Public Utilities Administration Building’s back-up generator. Justification The Public Utilities building houses the 24 hour system operations facility, for the city’s electric and water/wastewater infrastructure. The existing 1975 back-up generator has reached its mechanical limits and is now requiring numerous unplanned cost, to ensure that it is operational. the Public Utilities building were to experience an electrical outage and this back-up generator were to fail, the electric and water/wastewater departments would not be able to monitor or remotely control their respective systems or communicate with customers and staff. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Equip/Vehicle/Furnishings 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 46

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EE1291 Project Name Frazier Substation Reliability Upgrade Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 9 -- New Project: No Account Number: 487-8300-563.70-27 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $765,247 The high side of the substation will be upgraded to include transmission line protection breakers as well as the transformer breaker. Justification When the transmission line experiences a fault this substation loses power until the short circuit is found and the appropriate switching is accomplished. With the installation of the two new line breakers the faulted transmission line will be isolated from the substation and the customers will not experience an interruption of service. Consequences of delaying or eliminating thie project will be accepting the outages in the northwest section of the system during transmission line faults. The design will begin in July 2011; materials will be ordered in July 2012 and construction to be completed by June 2013. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 155,000 155,000 Construction/Maintenance 610,247 610,247 Total 155,000 610,247 765,247 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 155,000 610,247 765,247 Total 155,000 610,247 765,247 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 47

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EE1292 Project Name Distribution Feeder Replacement Program Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 8 -- New Project: No Account Number: 487-8300-563.90-25 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $1,387,550 Substation feeders are defined as the three-phase lines that carry the load from the substations to the customers’ neighborhood. They interconnect to other substations to provide load redundancy should there be a failure of an adjacent substation. Many of the older substation feeders have smaller conductors that cannot carry the load that is required during system peaks and emergency situations. This project would systematically upgrade these conductors to increase the capacity of the feeders as well as ultimately reducing system losses. Lastly, many of the feeder components have reached the end of their useful life and require substantial maintenance. Justification Due to the age and condition of the current feeders, delaying this systematic maintenance/upgrade program will result in reduced system utilization as well as detrimentally impacting future reliability. These lines are typically older, smaller, and are reaching the end of their life. This program will provide the needed systematic maintenance to the conductors, cross arms, switches, and insulators, as well as increasing system capacity hence resulting in more efficient operations by reducing line losses. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Construction/Maintenance 277,510 277,510 277,510 277,510 277,510 1,387,550 Total 277,510 277,510 277,510 277,510 277,510 1,387,550 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 277,510 277,510 277,510 277,510 277,510 1,387,550 Total 277,510 277,510 277,510 277,510 277,510 1,387,550 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 48

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EE1293 Project Name Distribution Capacitors and Controls Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 15-20 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 10 -- New Project: No Account Number: 48-8300-563.60-82 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $964,995 Install distribution capacitors throughout the system to correct poor power factor on distribution circuits. Install capacitor controllers capable of two-way communication to provide real-time monitoring and remote control operation. These controllers will be capable of switching the capacitors on and off to comply with system requirements. This project will also replace outdated substation meters with units capable of advanced metering such as power factor and harmonics to further analyze system performance. Lastly, distribution line recorders will be purchased and installed to provide power factor recordings to fine tune this operation. Justification Additional capacitance is required in order to meet system power factor requirements at the Delmarva Power and Light interchange point. This was substantiated through a load-flow study conducted by Shaw in early 2004 and distribution study by Wilson & Wilson in 2006. The current capacitor controls are not providing the granularity required to turn them off and on as required to meet both the power quality requirements of our customers and DP&L requirements. Additional controls are required to fine tune the systems operation. Without the additional capacitor banks and more importantly controls, the City may experience a low/high voltage problem at the customer level and/or the possibility of having to pay power factor penalties to Delmarva Power and Light. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 464,995 Construction/Maintenance 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Total Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 464,995 Electric I & E Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Total Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 49

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EE1294 Project Name Transmission Line Maintenance Program Type Maintenance Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 7 -- New Project: No Account Number: 487-8300-563.70-35 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $375,000 Replace aging porcelain insulators on the transmission pole lines with new polymer insulators. Justification Insulators have a defined equipment life due to sun and weather conditions breaking down the porcelain and base bonding cement. Insulators installed in 1960's and 1970's are due for replacement because of this deterioration. We have experienced several transmission outages due to insulator failure. Replacing the insulators should extend the life an additional 30 years. Outages may occur if insulators are not replaced and fail due to deterioration. Beginning in FY 2012 through FY 2017, we will replace the insulators on the older transmission lines. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Miscellaneous 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Total 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Total 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 50

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EE1596 Project Name SCADA Master Hardware Replacement Type Unassigned Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 5 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 6 -- New Project: Yes Account Number: TBD Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $75,000 This project would replace the aging Master station hardware. The Master station receives all the analog data, alarms and control for all electrical substations and wastewater lift stations. The master station in comprised of Dual Host Servers, Dual Operator consoles, paging system, web server, 2-Firewalls for DMZ and One remote access/support firewall. Justification The equipment has reached the end of its expected life and has already experienced a failure of one of the servers which required substantial expense to repair. It should be noted that this computer system operates 24/7; the additional firewalls are required to meet required system cyber security. If the system fails we will not be able to monitor or control electrical substations and we will not be able to view alarms for wastewater lift stations. This failure could result in electrical outages or wastewater overflows. The equipment will be ordered and replaced during the FY 12 budget year. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Construction/Maintenance 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 51

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EV1101 Project Name Distribution Upgrades Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 1 New Project: No Account Number: 487-8300-563.90-25 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $4,554,000 This project involves the systemic replacement of overhead lines with underground lines whenever services are being moved, wire is damaged, trees cause a high number of outages, or development is in progress, and when it is beneficial to the Utility to convert to underground. This can involve a single line section or an entire residential neighborhood. Annual outage records are reviewed and selected areas are scheduled for upgrade to underground service. Additionally, this program funds the replacement of existing underground conductors and equipment that have reached their useful life and have started failing and require replacement. This project will be ongoing over the 12 months of the budget year. This account is used to upgrade any trouble areas during the year. The following developments are to be upgraded: Huntley Circle and Autumn woods Apts. Justification The number of storm and tree-related outages has been greatly reduced under this program and further improvements can be made to insure the most reliable electric service possible. Reliability has become one of most important factors to electric customers, second only to safety. The utility has responded by attempting to provide the most reliable system possible. Underground cable replacement is necessary as the useful, reliable, life of the original underground cable was 20-30 years. By proactively replacing this cable we will minimize outages and improve system reliability. In addition to cable replacement, overhead lines are replaced with underground to minimize outages caused by tree growth or animal contact. Lastly, overhead lines that have reached the end of their useful life are replaced with underground instead of rebuilding the overhead. : Continued outages lead to increased complaints from our customers and will lead to customer dissatisfaction. There will be increased costs for repairs made under outage conditions as well as loss of electric revenue. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Construction/Maintenance 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Total 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Total 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 52

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 13-EE1390 Project Name Outage Management & Automatic Voice Reponse Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 5 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: 487-8300-563.40-25 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $250,000 To implement an outage management system that overlays the public utilities newly installed GIS mapping system. This project will be completed in FY 2013. Justification This outage management system will increase the electric department’s efficiency in managing outages. The system will provide the operators a precise troubleshooting algorithm, to allow for nearly immediate identification of the outage causes and quick dispatch of restoration personnel. The system will also provide an automatic voice response to manage the inrush of telephone calls, when an outage is being experienced. Therefore, additional public utilities’ staff will no longer be required to postpone their work obligations, to relocate to the system operation center or assist in receiving telephone calls. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Miscellaneous 250,000 250,000 Total 250,000 250,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 250,000 250,000 Total 250,000 250,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 53

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 13-EE1391 Project Name 69 kV Substation Switch Replacement Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: 487-8300-563.70-35 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $240,000 This project will be replacing obsolete 69kV switches in the substation/transmission system. Justification The majority of the switches are very old, making for difficult operation and frequent maintenance to ensure operation as needed. Delaying this program will result in switch failure possibly resulting in wide spread power outages. The system has experienced more frequent switch failures in recent years. The new switches will be gang operated switches which are electrically better to operate and most importantly increase safety to the operator. The switches that are to be replaced have reached the life expectancy and have a potential of failure if not replaced. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Miscellaneous 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Total 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Total 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 54

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 13-EE1392 Project Name Horsepond Substation Reliability Upgrade Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: 487-8300-563.70-27 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $761,812 The high-side of the substation will be upgraded to include two transmission line protection breakers. Justification When the transmission line experiences a fault this substation loses power until the short circuit is found and the appropriate switching is accomplished. With the installation of the line breakers the faulted transmission line will be isolated from the substation and the customers will not experience an interruption of service. Consequences of delaying or eliminating this project will result in accepting the outages in the southeast section of the system during transmission line faults. The design and long lead time materials will be completed in FY 2013 and the majority of the materials will be purchased and construction completed in FY 2014. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 70,000 60,000 130,000 Construction/Maintenance 100,000 531,812 631,812 Total 170,000 591,812 761,812 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 170,000 591,812 761,812 Total 170,000 591,812 761,812 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 55

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 13-EE1595 Project Name Division Street Substation Fence Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $70,000 This project will replace the existing fence at the Division Street Substation. Justification This project will replace the existing fence at Division Street Substation with a decorative fence, similar to the fence that was erected at St. Jones Substation. The existing fence no longer meets the National Electric Safety Code height requirements and is generally in poor condition. Existing structure does not meet the National Electric Safety Code (NESC). Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Other 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 56

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 14-EE1490 Project Name General Scott Switchgear Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $1,100,000 This project will replace the metal clad switchgear and replace the distribution breakers as they have reached the end of their useful life. Justification This station carries the industrial and residential load on the west side of Dover. The station distribution switch gear was installed in 1985 and the replacement of the switch gear should extend the life of the equipment to 2033. Additionally, the breakers have numerous moving parts, including plastic components that tend to fail with age resulting in mis-operation of the breaker. By replacing the General Scott’s aging switchgear, it will extend the life of the switchgear, and replacing the breakers will facilitate correct fault operation. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Construction/Maintenance 800,000 800,000 Miscellaneous 300,000 300,000 Total 800,000 300,000 1,100,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 800,000 300,000 1,100,000 Total 800,000 300,000 1,100,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 57

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 15-EE1590 Project Name Horsepond to Cartanza 69 kV Rebuild Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: TBD Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $330,467 This project will replace the poles, conductor, and insulators from Horsepond Substation to Long Point Road.This project will begin and reach completion in FY 2015. Justification Currently, the conductor size from Horsepond substation to Long Point rd limits the capacity that can be carried on feeder 4. An upgrade from the existing 636 ACSR to 795 ACSR would lift this limit and match the conductor from Cartanza Substation to Horsepond Substation. The poles have nearly reached the life expectancy. The batch of poles from Horsepond to Long Point Road have been known to have numerous problems with woodpecker destruction. The annual pole testing program has noted deficiencies in the above ground condition of these poles. Aging poles and hardware may fail causing outage in east Dover. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 75,000 75,000 Construction/Maintenance 225,425 225,425 Other 30,042 30,042 Total 330,467 330,467 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 330,467 330,467 Total 330,467 330,467 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 58

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 15-EE1591 Project Name System Automation Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 5-10 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: TBD Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $450,000 This project will engineer and install a self healing or "smart" distribution system. This project will begin in FY 2015 and reach completion in FY 2020. Justification This project will include an engineering study to be performed using a system model to develop a scheme that will allow the distribution system to be self healing in the event of a fault. Following the study, automation equipment will be purchased to detect problems on the system, isolate the affected area, and reenergize lines not affected. This will improve the reliability of the city’s local electric grid, minimize customer outages, and increase customer satisfaction. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 300,000 150,000 450,000 Total 300,000 150,000 450,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 300,000 150,000 450,000 Total 300,000 150,000 450,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 59

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 15-EE1593 Project Name 69 kV Cable Replacement North Street Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 30+ years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: TBD Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $565,710 This project will replace the aging 69 KV underground cables from North Street switching yard to Kraft’s and Proctor & Gamble’s (customer owned) substations. Justification Proctor & Gamble and Kraft are two (2) of the City of Dover’s 69 KV customers and it is our obligation to provide them with adequate and reliable service. The cables were installed in 1973 and have had two repairs. The first repair was in 1986 and the second repair was in 1992. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 85,000 85,000 Construction/Maintenance 480,710 480,710 Total 85,000 480,710 565,710 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 85,000 480,710 565,710 Total 85,000 480,710 565,710 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 60

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 15-EE1594 Project Name System Operations Monitoring Type Equipment Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 5 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $30,000 This project will replace the system operations monitoring screens.Completion is schedule for FY2015. Justification This project replaces the existing monitoring screens in system operations, with projection screens. City staff uses an array of these devices to view and operate the electric system and the lift stations. Additionally, the Public Utilities recently added 6 security cameras surrounding its facility and 2 security cameras at the interconnecting substation, which is our connection to the bulk electric system. These monitoring screens are also utilize in these security hardening measures. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Equip/Vehicle/Furnishings 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 61

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 16-EE1592 Project Name McKee Run Yard Rebuild Type Improvement Department Public Utilities- Electric Eng Useful Life 25+ years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: TBD Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $450,000 The purpose of this project is to refurbish McKee Run switching yard. The engineering will be completed in FY 2015. Construction will be the following year, FY 2016. Justification The City of Dover’s electrical system has undergone a complete conversion to a 69KV transmission network. Hence, eliminating the old 22KV transmission network. Therefore, the 22KV system located at McKee Run Generating Plant should also be eliminated and a second 12470/69 KV step-up transformer should be installed, provided that Units 1 & 2 are still in operation. The estimate is based on using the old Mid City Step up transformer. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 250,000 250,000 Miscellaneous 200,000 200,000 Total 450,000 450,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 450,000 450,000 Total 450,000 450,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 62

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-EE1111 Project Name New Developments Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Electric T&D Useful Life 30+ years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Electric Priority 1 New Project: No Account Number: 4878200-562.Several Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $4,634,800 This project purchases materials and equipment that are used to provide electric service to new housing developments, businesses, and industrial developments. Additionally, a portion of this expense is offset by the extension payments whereby new developers pay a $1,100 per residential lot connection fee, or business and industrial developers pay the total material expense for line extensions. This is an ongoing project and effects three separate accounts: 487-8200-562.60-31, 60-34, and 60-46. Justification During the course of each budget year, new developers request line extensions for new electric projects. Some are new projects, while other projects may have received plan approval previously but were not completed for any number of reasons. Consequences of delaying or eliminating this project include developers would not be able to receive electric service to new facilities. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Construction/Maintenance 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 3,000,000 Total 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 3,000,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Electric I & E Fund 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 3,000,000 Total 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 3,000,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 63

City of Dover, Delaware DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT Department Project# Priority FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Inflow/Infiltration Removal 12-WW1101 4 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,175,000 1,250,000 5,675,000 SCADA Equipment Technology Upgrade 12-WW1102 2 84,900 87,900 172,800 Lepore Road Pump Station Replacement 12-WW1104 3 350,000 350,000 Miscellaneous Sewer System Improvements 12-WW1105 1 37,000 39,000 41,000 43,000 45,000 205,000 Baltray Pump State Replacement 12-WW1290 6 25,000 100,000 125,000 Dover Brook Gardens Pump Station Upgrade 12-WW1291 7 15,000 50,000 65,000 Brandywine Pump Station Replacement 12-WW1292 8 52,000 350,000 402,000 McKee Road Pump Station Communator Replacement 12-WW1293 5 10,000 45,000 55,000 Hazlettville Road Interceptor 13-WW1390 n/a 30,000 740,000 770,000 Westover Pump Station and Force Main Upgrade 13-WW1392 n/a 65,000 703,800 768,800 Dover East Pump Station Abandonment & Sewer Line 13-WW1393 n/a 40,000 213,800 253,800 Lakeview Drive Pump Station Replacement 14-WW1580 n/a 52,000 450,000 502,000 Retreat Pump Station Replacement 15-WW1595 n/a 52,000 360,500 412,500 Rolling Acres Pump Station Replacement 16-WW1590 n/a 52,000 52,000 Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Total 1,573,900 1,806,900 3,000,600 1,720,000 1,707,500 9,808,900 Public Utilities-Water Mgmnt Miscellaneous Distribution System Improvements 12-WD1101 1 60,000 70,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 355,000 Wellhead Redevelopment Program 12-WD1102 2 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 82,500 372,500 Emergency Generators (Wells) 12-WD1292 4 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Water Quality Improvements 12-WQ1101 3 500,000 750,000 945,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 4,695,000 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tower 13-WD1290 n/a 2,000,000 390,000 2,390,000 Piney Point Well 13-WD1390 n/a 450,000 450,000 Future Columbia Well Installation 14-WD1490 n/a 55,000 55,000 Water Treatment Plant Process Improvements 14-WQ1390 n/a 150,000 350,000 550,000 1,050,000 SCADA Equipment Technology Upgrade 15-WD1590 n/a 80,000 80,000 160,000 Public Utilities-Water Mgmnt Total 705,000 3,420,000 1,770,000 1,585,000 2,287,500 9,767,500 GRAND TOTAL 2,278,900 5,226,900 4,770,600 3,305,000 3,995,000 19,576,400 Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 64

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WW1101 Project Name Inflow/Infiltration Removal Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 50 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 4 New Project: No Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $5,675,000 This project will identify and correct areas in the sanitary sewer collection system that are deteriorating and allowing groundwater to enter the sanitary sewer system through cracked pipes and/or joints. Video investigations of the lines will be performed in-house to determine the condition of subject pipes which may help with the identification of sump pumps and other illicit connections to the system which will have to be removed by individual property owners. In conjunction with the Water Quality Improvement Projects, sanitary sewer lines within the project areas will be video inspected to determine main condition. A work plan will be developed based on the results of the investigation. Justification The wet weather experienced in both 2003 and 2009/2010, highlighted the fact that we have an aging wastewater system that requires more attention to the condition of the old pipe network and more monitoring of illicit connections to the system. Inflow and infiltration are problems that all customers pay for since they are costs that are not assigned to an individual customer. Therefore, all customers are affected by expenses related to inflow and infiltration. Delaying or eliminating this project will result in continued higher treatment charges for wastewater flow to Kent County than is necessary. In addition, the reduction in available capacity in the City and county systems due to inflow and infiltration will reduce the capacity available for future growth. The wet weather which was experienced in both 2003 and 2009/2010, exemplified the fact that the aging and deteriorating sanitary sewer system allows groundwater and rain water to enter the system. This in turn results in higher treatment charges from Kent County. In FY 2011 a new groundwater inflow adjustment charge was established as a result. It is critical to continue making improvements on a regular and planned basis to improve the integrity of the wastewater system. Weather occurs in a cyclical fashion and discrepancies between fees collected and charges received will likely happen again when groundwater and precipitation levels rise. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Construction/Maintenance 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,175,000 1,250,000 5,675,000 Total 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,175,000 1,250,000 5,675,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total W/WW Debt Financing 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,175,000 1,250,000 5,675,000 Total 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,175,000 1,250,000 5,675,000 Budget Impact/Other The project will reduce the operating budget over time due to the reduction in costs for sewage treatment paid to Kent County. All savings are cumulative. Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 65

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WW1102 Project Name SCADA Equipment Technology Upgrade Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 10-12 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 2 New Project: No Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $484,800 This project involves the replacement of antiquated and/or obsolete remote terminal units (RTUs) at sewage pumping stations with new up-to- date serviceable SCADA equipment. Microwave radios, antennas, and enclosures would be upgraded as needed. The RTU and radio are the reporting equipment for the SCADA system (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) which reports, on a constant basis, the status of alarms at the City's pumping stations. The RTUs that are being replaced are outdated and unable to be repaired. Most of the equipment is installed in two steel cabinets mounted outside and are corroding. The new equipment is installed within a single fiberglass NEMA 4 enclosure. Justification Replace failing antiquated equipment with completely new alarm reporting equipment to provide reliable SCADA system reporting and to prevent the need for costly non budgeted emergency repairs. Equipment is becoming old, not supported by the manufacturer, and obsolete. Each Year; order equipment and construct cabinets and back-plates by December; complete installation by June. Stations being completed in FY 2012: DelTech Pump Station, Turnberry Pump Station, Baltray Pump Station, Westminster Pump Station, Emerald Point Pump Station and Kurt Drive Pump Station. This is an ongoing project that started in FY 2008, and will be completed in FY 2013. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 312,000 Construction/Maintenance 16,000 16,600 32,600 Miscellaneous 68,900 71,300 140,200 Total Total 84,900 87,900 172,800 Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 312,000 W/WW Debt Financing 84,900 87,900 172,800 Total Total 84,900 87,900 172,800 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 66

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WW1104 Project Name Lepore Road Pump Station Replacement Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 3 New Project: No Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $402,000 A replacement of this station was identified in the 2009 Wastewater Master Plan, and the current proposal is to completely replace the aging station with a new Smith & Loveless Station, as well as address problems in the immediate upstream gravity sanitary sewer lines. Justification The existing pumps are oversized and inefficient. Therefore, new pumps will be sized for the correct capacity of the wet well. The brick wet well is subject to the groundwater infiltration. The upstream gravity line has a depression that collects grease. Delaying or eliminating this project would result in the continued deterioration of the infrastructure necessitating the need for more extensive repairs in the future. This project will have a slight impact on our Inflow and Infiltration problem. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 52,000 Construction/Maintenance 350,000 350,000 Total Total 350,000 350,000 Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 52,000 W/WW Debt Financing 350,000 350,000 Total Total 350,000 350,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 67

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WW1105 Project Name Miscellaneous Sewer System Improvements Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 1 New Project: WW1105 Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-35 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $414,500 This project will primarily address emergency sanitary sewer infrastructure repairs including sanitary sewer mains and laterals within major roadways, major pump station and force main failures and associated appurtenances. These funds can also be used to partner with private developers to oversize future mains or to install associated improvements to meet the long term goals of the utility. Justification Emergency repairs are performed by private contractors or in-house crews as dictated by the scope of work. All costs for over sizing will be paid through negotiated cost and public utilities agreements. Due to the age of the sanitary sewer system, it can be expected that system failures will occur resulting in capital expenses to repair or replace the failed component(s). In addition, missing opportunities to oversize or reroute mains will result in higher construction costs in the future. Delaying or eliminating this project would result in reduced ability to properly address system failures and missed opportunities to expand the system. This is an ongoing annual program. Emergency repairs are addressed as they occur. This project will primarily address emergency sanitary sewer infrastructure repairs including sanitary sewer mains and laterals within major roadways, major pump station and force main failures and associated appurtenances. These funds can also be used to partner with private developers to oversize future mains or to install associated improvements to meet the long term goals of the utility. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 209,500 Construction/Maintenance 37,000 39,000 41,000 43,000 45,000 205,000 Total Total 37,000 39,000 41,000 43,000 45,000 205,000 Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 209,500 W/WW Debt Financing 37,000 39,000 41,000 43,000 45,000 205,000 Total Total 37,000 39,000 41,000 43,000 45,000 205,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 68

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WW1290 Project Name Baltray Pump State Replacement Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 6 -- New Project: No Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $125,000 The proposed project includes the in kind replacement of the grinder pumping station installed with the construction of the Baltray Subdivision in 1988. The station is approaching its anticipated life expectancy of 20-25 years. The grinder pumps, rail system, and electric controls and communator will be replaced. Justification Replace the aging station with new components to prevent the need for costly non budgeted repairs to maintain operation. Because of the age of the pump station, certain parts are no longer obtainable, and replacement of equipment is costly. Grinder pumps require periodic repairs and replacement to maintain efficient operation. During previous pump removal, staff has noticed leaking seals and instability in the rail system for the pumps due to corrosion. Although grinder pumps are less costly than standard pumps used elsewhere, they are only appropriate under certain conditions. As a grinder pump is still effective at this location, it will be replaced in kind. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 25,000 25,000 Construction/Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total 25,000 100,000 125,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 25,000 100,000 125,000 Total 25,000 100,000 125,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 69

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WW1291 Project Name Dover Brook Gardens Pump Station Upgrade Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 7 -- New Project: No Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $65,000 This project would construct a force main priming loop to insure that adequate back pressure is provided to the check valves to maintain prime on the vacuum primed Smith & Loveless pumps and upgrade to maintain or increase capacity. The loop is to create a high point in the force main above the pumps to provide a column of water against the check valves. The existing force main was originally installed with a constant slope away from the station to the receiving gravity sewer manhole. The force main drains by gravity away from the check valves providing very little static water pressure to hold check valves closed. Justification Reduce maintenance time of cleaning check valves weekly and on-call or overtime pay when the pumps lose prime. Staff has observed numerous high wet well alarms due to pump loss of prime. Construction to be provided by in-house crew. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 15,000 15,000 Construction/Maintenance 50,000 50,000 Total 15,000 50,000 65,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 15,000 50,000 65,000 Total 15,000 50,000 65,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 70

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WW1292 Project Name Brandywine Pump Station Replacement Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 8 -- New Project: Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $402,000 The proposed project includes the replacement of the Smith & Loveless package pumping station installed in 1977. The station has exceeded its life anticipated expectancy of 20-25 years and is in need of a capacity upgrade due to the increased growth in the basin. Justification Replace the aged station with a completely new station to prevent the need for costly non budgeted repairs to maintain operation. Due to the age of the pump station, certain parts are no longer obtainable, and replacement of equipment is costly. This station was installed for the Dover Country Club Apartments when City sewer was made available to this area. The site was previously outside the City's service area and had its own onsite sewer treatment system. Over the life span of this station, it has seen increased flows with the construction of Mallard Pond, Marsh Creek, and Westwind Meadows, and the extension of service to Fox Hall Drive and possible infiltration. Based on the monthly runtime hours, the station is currently operating at 130 percent of desired capacity. Staff has observed numerous pump clogs and failures in the past years. The Dover Country Club and Brandywine Condo sewer lines are old and possibly influenced by infiltration. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 52,000 52,000 Construction/Maintenance 350,000 350,000 Total 52,000 350,000 402,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 52,000 350,000 402,000 Total 52,000 350,000 402,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 71

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WW1293 Project Name McKee Road Pump Station Communator Replacement Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 5 New Project: No Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $55,000 The proposed project includes the replacement of the communator at the influent line to the pumping station installed in 1995. This acts as a screen/grinder at the influent side of the station, cutting or stopping large debris from entering the wet well and clogging the pumps. The communator motor has run 24/7 since the initial startup of the pumping station. Justification Replace the aging equipment to prevent the need for costly unbudgeted repairs to maintain operation. Unbudgeted costly repairs to communator and damage to a pump when failure occurs. Due to the age of the station, certain parts are no longer obtainable, and replacement of equipment is costly. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 10,000 10,000 Construction/Maintenance 45,000 45,000 Total 10,000 45,000 55,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 10,000 45,000 55,000 Total 10,000 45,000 55,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 72

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 13-WW1390 Project Name Hazlettville Road Interceptor Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 90+ years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority n/a New Project: Yes Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-35 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $770,000 This project, identified in the 2009 Wastewater Master Plan, identified sections of 15” gravity wastewater main as being overloaded in peak conditions, due to a negative slope in the pipe. This project calls for the upgrade of roughly 1,320 linear feet of wastewater main. The proposed upgrade will install 21” main at proper slope to provide adequate capacity and allow for future growth in the basin. Justification This project has been identified by the 2009 Wastewater Master Plan that the section of pipes is flowing nearly full, due to negative slope. This project will allow for proper capacity to handle current flow as well to allow for growth. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 30,000 30,000 Construction/Maintenance 740,000 740,000 Total 30,000 740,000 770,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 30,000 740,000 770,000 Total 30,000 740,000 770,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 73

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 13-WW1392 Project Name Westover Pump Station and Force Main Upgrade Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $768,800 The proposed project includes the upgrade of the Smith & Loveless pumping station and force main installed in 1994. The pump station's available capacity will be consumed with the build out of the Village of Cannon Mills and will be in need of additional capacity in order to be able receive additional flow from the west. The project will include replacement of interior six-inch suction and discharge piping with eight-inch pipe, upgrade 1,400 feet of six-inch force main to 12-inch diameter pipe from the station to Electric Avenue. Justification Provide adequate capacity to receive additional sewage flow from the immediate vicinity due to development and annexation. Possible pipe rupture due to high head pressures and water hammer. A rupture could cause the station to flood causing damage to motors and controls or spilling raw sewage into the Puncheon Run stream. This project is related to the Comprehensive Plan Update. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 65,000 65,000 Construction/Maintenance 703,800 703,800 Total 65,000 703,800 768,800 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 65,000 703,800 768,800 Total 65,000 703,800 768,800 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 74

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 13-WW1393 Project Name Dover East Pump Station Abandonment & Sewer Line Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 90+ years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-35 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $253,800 The proposed project includes the abandonment and removal of the existing Smith & Loveless package capsular pumping station. This scope of work will also include the removal of the existing wet well. The station will be eliminated due to the construction to occur on the Rojan Meadows Subdivision site. East Dover MHP will connect to the new Rojan Meadows pump station by installing approximately 400 lf of 12” gravity sanitary sewer. The existing Dover East station has exceeded its anticipated life expectancy of 20-25 years and the removal of this station can be justified because of the pump station being constructed at the Rojan Meadows Subdivision site. The pump station at Rojan Meadows will be sized to handle the Dover East wastewater and will discharge directly into the Central Transmission Bypass. Justification The removal of the existing pump station will prevent the need for maintenance, and costly repairs to the system. The gravity sanitary sewer line will be beneficial to the City of Dover because of the low maintenance costs compared to the costs of maintaining and operating the existing pump station. Maintenance and expense for operating a station is no longer required. This station was installed with the development of the East Dover Mobile Home Park in 1973. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 40,000 40,000 Construction/Maintenance 213,800 213,800 Total 40,000 213,800 253,800 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 40,000 213,800 253,800 Total 40,000 213,800 253,800 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 75

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 14-WW1580 Project Name Lakeview Drive Pump Station Replacement Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: TBD Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $502,000 This project calls for replacement of the Smith & Loveless package pumping station installed in 1971. The station has exceeded its life anticipated expectancy of 20-25 years and is need of a capacity upgrade due to high peak inflow rates. Justification Replace the aged station with a completely new station to prevent the need for costly unbudgeted repairs to maintain operation. Due to the age of the station, certain parts are no longer obtainable and replacement of equipment is costly. Design and bid in FY 2014; construction in FY 2015. This station is located within the roadway of Lakeview Drive. The design portion of this project is to address the relocation of this station. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 52,000 52,000 Construction/Maintenance 450,000 450,000 Total 52,000 450,000 502,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 52,000 450,000 502,000 Total 52,000 450,000 502,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 76

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 15-WW1595 Project Name Retreat Pump Station Replacement Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: TBD Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $412,500 The proposed project includes the replacement of the Smith & Loveless package pumping station installed in 1978. The station has exceeded its life expectancy of 20-25 years and is in need of a capacity upgrade due to the increased growth in the basin. Justification Replace the aged station with a completely new station to prevent the need for costly non budgeted repairs to maintain operation. Due to the age of the pump station, certain parts are no longer obtainable and replacement of equipment is costly. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 52,000 52,000 Construction/Maintenance 360,500 360,500 Total 52,000 360,500 412,500 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total W/WW Debt Financing 360,500 360,500 Water/Wastewater Fund 52,000 52,000 Total 52,000 360,500 412,500 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 77

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 16-WW1590 Project Name Rolling Acres Pump Station Replacement Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Wastewater Mg Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: 417-6900-569.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $412,500 This project calls for replacement of the Smith & Loveless package pumping station installed in 1973 in order to handle the commercial areas from Harrington Realty Shopping Center to the Howard Johnson Hotel. The station has exceeded its life anticipated expectancy of 20-25 years and is in need of a capacity upgrade due to the high peak inflow rates. Justification Replace the aged station with a completely new station to prevent the need for costly unbudgeted repairs to maintain operation. Due to the age of the station, certain parts are no longer obtainable, and replacement of equipment is costly. This station experiences periods of high inflow rates due to the hotel occupancy and is susceptible to possible inflow/infiltration. Staff has observed numerous pump high wet well alarms due to high inflows and increased runtimes during wet months. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Planning/Design 52,000 52,000 360,500 Total 52,000 52,000 Total Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Future Water/Wastewater Fund 52,000 52,000 360,500 Total 52,000 52,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 78

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WD1101 Project Name Miscellaneous Distribution System Improvements Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Water Mgmnt Useful Life Unknown Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 1 New Project: No Account Number: 417-6800-568.40-34 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $883,948 This project will primarily address emergency distribution system infrastructure repairs including water mains and services within major roadways and associated appurtenances. This project will also install improvements identified by the flushing program such as valve insertions and hydrant installations. These funds can also be used to partner with private developers to oversize future mains or to install associated improvements to meet the long term goals of the utility. Justification Due to the age of the water system, it can be expected that system failures will occur resulting in capital expenses to repair or replace the failed component(s). Implementing improvements identified by the flushing program will aide in improved operational control of the system. In addition, missing opportunities to oversize or reroute mains will result in higher construction costs in the future. Delaying or eliminating this project would result in reduced ability to properly address system failures and missed opportunities to expand the distribution system. This is an ongoing annual program. Emergency repairs are addressed as they occur. Emergency repairs are performed by private contractors or in-house crews as dictated by the scope of work. All costs for over sizing will be paid through negotiated cost and public utilities agreements. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 528,948 Construction/Maintenance 60,000 70,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 355,000 Total Total 60,000 70,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 355,000 Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 528,948 W/WW Debt Financing 60,000 70,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 355,000 Total Total 60,000 70,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 355,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 79

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WD1102 Project Name Wellhead Redevelopment Program Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Water Mgmnt Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 2 New Project: No Account Number: 417-6800-568.40-34 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $768,462 This project will provide for rehabilitation and repair of each deep wellhead in an effort to maintain operations and/or increase the yield of each well as it relates to the permitted allocation. Justification The well screening and gravel pack requires cleaning over time due to a buildup of mineral deposits and foreign materials such as clay and silt. This maintenance effort is critical to ensure that production can continue to meet demand. It is also necessary to maintain the operational aspects of each well and provide repairs as needed to minimize downtime to maintain system capacity. Delaying or eliminating this project would result in the continued deterioration of the well screen, gravel pack, and well yield over time. It would also result in increased well downtime, emergency repairs, and decreased capacity. These issues can lead to increased flow pattern changes and water quality concerns. Improved operating efficiencies at the wellhead will slightly reduce power costs, but this savings has not been quantified. FY 2008; total well inspection and testing performed. FY 2009: Motors at Wells #6A and #9 were rebuilt, and wells #13R and #15 were redeveloped. FY 2010: Well #10. FY 2011: Well #4 redevelopment and well piping improvements at various well locations. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Construction/Maintenance 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 82,500 372,500 Total 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 82,500 372,500 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total W/WW Debt Financing 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 82,500 372,500 Total 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 82,500 372,500 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 80

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WD1292 Project Name Emergency Generators (Wells) Type Equipment Department Public Utilities-Water Mgmnt Useful Life 10-12 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 4 New Project: No Account Number: 417-6800-568.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $240,000 This project, identified in the 2006 Water Master Plan Update, would provide emergency generators for large production wells. Justification This project will provide emergency power to wells for continued water production and reliability in the event of power disruptions or other emergencies. Portable or fixed generators are currently not available to most of the deep wells. All generators purchased will be permanent fixtures at each site. Generator purchased in FY 2012 will support Well #2, FY 2013 will support Well #6 and FY 2014 will support Well #10. Currently, a portable generator is stationed at Well #10, after installation of permanent generator at Well #10; the portable generator will be used at medium sized production wells as needed. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Miscellaneous 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Total 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Total 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 81

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 12-WQ1101 Project Name Water Quality Improvements Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Water Mgmnt Useful Life 90+ years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority 3 New Project: No Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $4,695,000 This project was first identified by staff and the 2006 Water Master Plan Update, and has since become further refined with the FY 2006 Water Quality Evaluation. Projects to be included under this category primarily consist of replacement or relining of old unlined cast iron water main within the City’s water distribution system; system upgrades to improve system control; and utilization of a consultant to provide additional design and evaluation services, as needed. Recent research and data collections have produced a Water Main Rehabilitation Priority List, based on several criterions to identify water mains that are in need of replacement or relining. Pipes will be upgraded according to the severity of the pipe condition, as well as coordination with the City of Dover’s Public Services Street Rehabilitation Program. Between FY 2008 and FY 2011, the deep well contact chamber designs were completed and installed completed. Water mains have been replaced over this time frame in Washington Street, Pennsylvania Avenue, South Street, Pear Street, West Street, Hazel Road, Maryland Avenue and American Avenue. Operational efforts, such as flushing, will continue to occur on a routine basis. Justification Water quality complaints have eroded consumer confidence in the City’s water supply as the water is perceived to be aesthetically unpleasant. In order to reduce complaints and potentially alleviate this problem, it is necessary to implement the improvements identified by staff, the 2006 Water Master Plan Update, and the FY 2006 Water Quality Evaluation. Delaying or eliminating this project will prolong customer dissatisfaction and further erode confidence in the City’s water supply. In addition, main rehabilitation and replacement, ensuring pipes do not significantly exceed the expected life cycle, is critical to provide a reliable supply of water for our customers and for fire suppression. Water leaks and breaks on older lines can have a significant impact on our ability to serve over time. As part of the Water Main Rehabilitation Priority List, water lines were identified throughout the City that requires replacement/relining. Using this as a guide the following water line rehabilitation projects are scheduled for FY 2012: William Street Construction, West Street East Alley Construction, Fairview East & West Alley Design, Lakewood Place Design and Governors Ave. W Alley Design. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 86,000 65,000 50,000 125,000 150,000 476,000 Construction/Maintenance 414,000 685,000 895,000 875,000 1,350,000 4,219,000 Total 500,000 750,000 945,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 4,695,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total W/WW Debt Financing 500,000 750,000 945,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 4,695,000 Total 500,000 750,000 945,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 4,695,000 Budget Impact/Other Addressing the brown water and associated water quality concerns of the City’s water system will not only require capital improvements to the system but also operational changes. Some operation changes will result in no net effect on the operating budget, while others will need to be addressed in the development of future operating budgets. Such items include tools and supplies necessary to improve system sampling and monitoring as well as tools and supplies necessary to improve system-wide flushing operations. Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 82

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 13-WD1290 Project Name 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tower Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Water Mgmnt Useful Life 90+ years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: 417-6800-568.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $3,085,000 The proposed project, identified by staff and confirmed by the 2006 Water Master Plan Update, will construct a new 1.0 million gallon elevated storage tank within the distribution system. Justification This project was determined necessary by the 2006 Water Mater Plan Update in order to meet future storage volume requirements based upon demands and to aid in reducing low pressure areas and enhance fire suppression capability. Delaying or eliminating this project will result in preventing growth within the system, particularly, fire suppression measures will be compromised. This project is related to the Piney Point Well. Construction is planned for FY 2013 and FY 2014 The planning, site selection and land acquisition was conducted between FY 2009 and FY 2011. For bonding purposes, the construction of the tank has been divided between two fiscal years. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 695,000 Construction/Maintenance 2,000,000 390,000 2,390,000 Total Total 2,000,000 390,000 2,390,000 Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 695,000 W/WW Debt Financing 2,000,000 390,000 2,390,000 Total Total 2,000,000 390,000 2,390,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 83

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 13-WD1390 Project Name Piney Point Well Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Water Mgmnt Useful Life 50 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority n/a New Project: Account Number: Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $645,000 This project, identified by staff and confirmed by the 2006 Water Master Plan Update, proposes the drilling of a new Piney Point Aquifer Production Well to increase production capacity up to our current permitted allocation as well as increase system pressure and stabilize the chlorine residuals of the City. Justification A reduction in long-term yield from our Piney Point Well is causing a greater reliance on our more costly aquifers. Delaying or eliminating this project would result in the continued reduction in our production capabilities under our permitted allocation, as well as our ability to meet projected demand increases. This project is related to the 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tank. Planning started in FY 2009. Design continued in FY 2010 and FY 2011. Construction to be completed in FY 2013. The proposed wellhead is planned to be located in Schutte Park. It is intended that the yield from a new production well will allow us to abandon one of our poorly performing wells. Prior Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 195,000 Construction/Maintenance 450,000 450,000 Total Total 450,000 450,000 Prior Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total 195,000 Water/Wastewater Fund 450,000 450,000 Total Total 450,000 450,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 84

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 14-WD1490 Project Name Future Columbia Well Installation Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Water Mgmnt Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: 417-6800-568.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $55,000 This project, identified by staff and confirmed by the 2006 Water Master Plan Update, proposes the drilling of new shallow well to increase production capacity at the Water Treatment Plant to design levels of 5.0 Million Gallons per Day. This project is to be completed in conjunction with the Water Treatment Plant Process Improvements. Justification To meet increased water demand and fire suppression requirements. Delaying or eliminating this project would result in the continued reduction in our production capabilities under our permitted allocation, as well as limiting the City’s growth. This project is related to the Water Treament Plant Process Improvements. Planning is proposed for FY 2014. Design and site procurement are planned for FY 2017. Construction to be completed in FY 2018. The specific location of a proposed wellhead has not been determined at this time. The location will be selected in the planning and design phase. In addition, the yield from a new production well may allow us to abandon some of our poorly performing wells. Land costs are based upon the need of 1/4 acre of land for the project. This project will be designed in FY 2014 to coincide with the Water Treatment Plant Process Improvements Design, Construction is planned for FY 18. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 25,000 25,000 Land Acquisition 30,000 30,000 Total 55,000 55,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 55,000 55,000 Total 55,000 55,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 85

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 14-WQ1390 Project Name Water Treatment Plant Process Improvements Type Improvement Department Public Utilities-Water Mgmnt Useful Life 20-25 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority n/a New Project: No Account Number: TBD Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $1,050,000 This project, identified in the 2006 Water Master Plan Update, proposes process improvements to the existing Water Treatment Plant. Due to limitations with the Ozone Contactors, the capacity at the Water Treatment Plant is limited to 4.0 Million Gallons per day, as opposed to 5.0 Million Gallons per day, as originally designed. A consultant will be utilized to determine the best means and improvements necessary to increase the capacity. This project is to be performed in conjunction with the future Columbia Well installation. Justification Process improvements will allow for capacity enhancements as well as improved ability to meet regulatory requirements. Delaying or eliminating this project can result in production capacity decreases, which could limit growth, and/or regulatory compliance. Planning is proposed for FY 2014. Construction to begin in FY 2015. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Planning/Design 150,000 150,000 Construction/Maintenance 350,000 550,000 900,000 Total 150,000 350,000 550,000 1,050,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 150,000 350,000 550,000 1,050,000 Total 150,000 350,000 550,000 1,050,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 86

DRAFT Capital Investments Plan FY 12 thru FY 16 City of Dover, Delaware Project # 15-WD1590 Project Name SCADA Equipment Technology Upgrade Type Equipment Department Public Utilities-Water Mgmnt Useful Life 10-12 years Contact Public Utilities Director Category Water/Wastewater Priority n/a New Project: Yes Account Number: 417-6800-568.40-31 Time-Line: Description Total Project Cost: $160,000 This project involves the replacement of antiquated and/or obsolete equipment related to the SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) system, which controls water production. This equipment includes, but not limited to, Remote Telemetry Units (RTUs), Master Telemetry Unit (MTU) and Radios. SCADA is used for reporting, on a constant basis, the status of the City of Dover’s water production wells as well as the Water Treatment Plant. The equipment being replaced would be outdated, or unable to be repaired. Justification Replace failing and antiquated equipment to improve monitoring ability and system control to comply with regulatory and reporting requirements and to prevent the need for costly non budgeted emergency repairs. Due to the age of some of the equipment, only used parts are available. Lack of alarms regarding problems at water production wells and the water treatment plant. Failures would provide no advance warnings of failures in the field at water production sites. Previous Remote Control and Monitoring Projects, Routine operational replacement of old exhausted equipment. Water Treatment Plant Process Improvements. Each Year: order equipment for delivery by December; complete installation by June. It is estimated that upgrades will be made at deep well sites and the Water Treatment Plant, as part of this program. Expenditures FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Miscellaneous 80,000 80,000 160,000 Total 80,000 80,000 160,000 Funding Sources FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Water/Wastewater Fund 80,000 80,000 160,000 Total 80,000 80,000 160,000 Budget Impact/Other Thursday, February 17, 2011

Page 87

4401 Fair Lakes Court Fairfax, VA 22033 USA Phone: 1.703.818.9100 www.paceglobal.com City of Dover December Monthly Report Energy and Operations Management January 27, 2011 This Report was produced by Pace Global Energy Services, LLC (“Pace Global”) and is meant to be read as a whole and in conjunction with this disclaimer. Any use of this Report other than as a whole and in conjunction with this disclaimer is forbidden. Any use of this Report outside of its stated purpose without the prior written consent of Pace Global is forbidden. Except for its stated purpose, this Report may not be copied or distributed in whole or in part without Pace Global’s prior written consent. This Report and the information and statements herein are based in whole or in part on information obtained from various sources as of December, 2010. While Pace Global believes such information to be accurate, it makes no assurances, endorsements or warranties, express or implied, as to the validity, accuracy or completeness of any such information, any conclusions based thereon, or any methods disclosed in this Report. Pace Global assumes no responsibility for the results of any actions and inactions taken on the basis of this Report. By a party using, acting or relying on this Report, such party consents and agrees that Pace Global, its employees, directors, officers, contractors, advisors, members, affiliates, successors and agents shall have no liability with respect to such use, actions, inactions, or reliance. This Report does contain some forward-looking opinions. Certain unanticipated factors could cause actual results to differ from the opinions contained herein. Forward-looking opinions are based on historical and/or current information that relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Some of the unanticipated factors, among others, that could cause the actual results to differ include regulatory developments, technological changes, competitive conditions, new products, general economic conditions, changes in tax laws, adequacy of reserves, credit and other risks associated with City of Dover and/or other third parties, significant changes in interest rates and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Further, certain statements, findings and conclusions in this Report are based on Pace Global’s interpretations of various contracts. Interpretations of these contracts by legal counsel or a jurisdictional body could differ. Setting the Pace in energy since 1976 Washington • Houston • Columbia • London • Moscow

Page 88

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 – Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................2 2.0 – Budget Report .......................................................................................................................5 2.1 – Variance Report ..................................................................................................................6 2.2 – Variance Analysis ...............................................................................................................8 3.0 – Energy management ...........................................................................................................10 3.1 – Purchased Power ...............................................................................................................10 3.2 – Generation Management ...................................................................................................13 3.3 – Emissions and Allowance Management ...........................................................................20 4.0 – Operations Management ....................................................................................................26 Appendices ....................................................................................................................................42 I. PJM Invoice Breakdown ....................................................................................................42 II. Load, All In Energy and all in cost of service table...........................................................43 III. Glossary .............................................................................................................................44 1

Page 89

1.0 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Generation MWh's: Actual v Budget All In Unit Energy Cost - Actual v Budget Actual Load vs Budget Load 30,000 100,000 $92 25,000 $90 75,000 $88 20,000 $86 MWh MWh $/MWh 15,000 50,000 $84 10,000 $82 25,000 5,000 $80 0 $78 0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Budget Gen Actual Gen Budget Actual Budget ($/MWh) Actual ($/MWh) Budget WA Actual WA Purchased Power Management Wholesale load for the month of December was 63,566 MWhs, versus a weather normalized projected load of 58,125 MWhs. Hedged transactions accounted for 48,200 MWhs or 76% of this volume (83% of forecasted load) at a cost of $3.73 million. Spot Market purchases resulted in a PJM charge of $1.33 million (a $1.3 million charge in the Day Ahead market and a $300 thousand charge in the Real Time market). Other PJM related charges accounted for an additional cost of $1.4 million, inclusive of all load related fees. December’s Energy Only Unit Cost, excluding capacity obligations and credits, was $1.98/MWh unfavorable compared to the budgeted value of $85.35/MWh. Dover’s projected all in Cost of Service for FY2010-2011 is $88.46/MWh, or $2.77/MWh favorable as compared to the Budget1. Generation and Asset Management For the month of December the McKee Run and Van Sant units were not dispatched into the PJM market. A relatively low average for on-peak LMPs during the month demonstrated that the PJM system did not generally require support from peaking units. The budget did not project generation for this month. Emissions Allowance Management Given the regulatory uncertainty surrounding the allowance markets, Dover has elected not to include revenues from emission allowance sales in its 2010-2011 fiscal year budget. Dover purchased and retired 53 NOX seasonal allowances on November 23rd in order to meet its 2010 NOX seasonal compliance position. Dover has the appropriate number of allowances were set aside for retirement (see Exhibit 1). 1 The projected all in Cost of Service is based on YTD actual results for 6 months and 6 months of projected costs. 2

Page 90

Exhibit 1: Emissions and Allowance Summary through December 31, 2010 2010-2011 EMISSIONS & ALLOWANCE SUMMARY SO2 NOx Date Action Allowance Sale Revenue1 Allowance Sale Revenue1 Allocation Price Allocation2 Price Seas. Ann. 1/1/08 2007 Carryover 549 0 -- -- -- 1/1/09 2008 Carryover 2,691 0 1/1/09 Initial 2009 2,723 -- -- 51 78 -- -- Allocation 2/1/10 Initial 2010 1,988 49 76 Allocation N/A 2003-2006 139 Carryover 9/29/09 SO2 Sales (1,500) 11/12/09 NOX Ann. Sales (45) 11/13/09 SO2 Sales (1,410) 11/20/09 NOx Seas. Sales (25) 12/31/09 2009 YTD (1) -- -- (6) (13) -- -- Emissions3 12/31/10 2010 YTD (2) -- -- (54) (54) -- -- Emissions 6/1/10 State Re- -- -- -- 3 2 -- -- allocation 10/31/10 EPA Linearity (68) TBD Testing Req. 11/23/10 Market Purchase 53 Totals - Allowances 5,177 -- $0 2 44 -- $0 $0 $0 Total Revenue $0 Notes: (1) Revenue calculations account for a $0.50/ton broker fee for SO2, $10/ton broker fee for NOx annual and $5/ton broker fee for NOX seasonal. (2) Per the Clean Air Interstate Rule, in 2009 NOx emissions will be governed by a seasonal and annual program. The NOx seasonal emissions pertain only to emissions (May 1 – Sep 30), similar to the previous trading regimen. Annual emissions cover the entire year. Given current dispatch expectations, the market value of the remaining 2007-2010 Dover allowance inventory is approximately $34,766.25 at the time of this report. This represents 3,191 pre-CAIR SO2 allowances trading at $9/ton, 1,986 post-CAIR SO2 allowances2 trading at 2 Pace Global is assuming and recommending that Dover retire vintage 2010 SO2 allowances for their 2010 emissions. Per CAIR, 2010 or later vintage allowances are worth half of a ton for compliance purposes. Given the regulatory and legislative uncertainty surrounding the SO2 markets, and the greater value 2009 allowances have for compliance purposes, Pace Global recommends retaining 2009 vintage allowances over 2010 vintage allowances when possible. 3

Page 91

$5/ton, and 2 NOx seasonal allowances trading at $25/ton. NOx annual allowances are currently trading at $345/ton, however after an expected true-up with the 2010 annual season NOx program, Dover does not have any NOx annual allowances in its allowance bank. EMISSIONS & ALLOWANCE SUMMARY Through December 31, 2010 Allowance Allowance Emissions Emissions Allowances Allowances Allowance Vintage Allocation Month Sold Month Sold Balance SO2 – 2003-06 1393 N/A N/A 0 139 0 SO2 – 2007 2723 0 98 0 2,455 1704 SO2 – 2008 2723 0 32 0 2,392 299 SO2 – 2009 2723 0 1 0 0 2722 SO2 – 2010 1988 0 2 0 0 1986 NOx – 2007 198 0 32 0 166 0 NOx – 2008 198 0 20 0 178 0 5 NOx Annu – 2009 80 0 13 0 45 22 NOx Seas – 2009 53 0 6 0 25 0 NOx Annu – 2010 76 0 54 0 0 22 NOx Seas – 2010 50 0 54 0 0 0 Operations Management Summary During the month of December there were no reportable or lost time accidents or injuries. The facility has now gone 78 days without an OSHA recordable accident and 78 consecutive days without a lost time reportable accident. There were zero Environmental Notices of Violations issued and no near miss events. There were no unit dispatches by PJM for the generating Units at McKee Run or the Unit at Van Sant. Monthly Budget Variance - The actual expenses attributable to O&M of the two sites for the month of December were $650,730. The expenses were $160,215 or 32.66% over the approved budget of $490,515. The principal reasons for the negative variance were due to higher electricity demand charges, increases in Contractual Services and Right of Ways costs, and the costs associated with the repairs of the Unit 3 boiler. 3 To facilitate tracking of emission allowances, the EPA assigns an identification number and serial number to every allowance. During the allowance transfer transaction, 139 unaccounted SO2 allowances from vintage years 2003-06 were utilized. 4 Corrected 2007 SO2 tons emitted to reflect actual emission for Units 3 & 11. The December 2007 report included emissions for all four units. 5 Approximately 10 tons of NOx emissions resulted from the February 2010 McKee Run testing associated with the Pollution Remediation project and the June 2010 emission testing project. 4

Page 92

Risk Management Summary Forward PJM power prices were mixed since the last reporting period. Further out fiscal years fell during the period while the more near-term years rose slightly. The mixed prices were driven by cold temperatures across much of the country pushing nearer term prices up. Further out prices fall in large part due to the continued bearish storage picture. Note that the 2010-2011 year also had a higher priced month, January, roll off causing a drop in the average price for the remainder of the year, even though the remaining months increased since the last reporting period. Forward Dover Zone power prices for FY 2010-11 decreased by $4.49 (a decrease of 10.13%) since the last reporting period while FY 2011-2012, FY 2012-2013, FY 2013-2014, and FY 2014-2015 all changed by approximately +$1.02/MWh to -$1.42/MWh (representing a range of 1.97% increase and a 2.54% decrease, respectively) compared with the last reporting period. The individual years’ hedge ratios and Cost-of-Service projections are shown in the table below: Wholesale Cost-of-Service Summary (Projected) Date 1/20/2011 Budget January Dec Nov Cost-of Cost-of- Service Year-to Forecasted Cost-of Cost-of Hedge Power Year Service w/Solar Ratio Year over 2009- Service Service Budget Costs Only Increase 10 Budget $/MWh $/MWh $/MWh* 2010-2011 N/A $85.15 89% -4.8% -8.97% $84.93 $84.98 2011-2012 N/A $79.52 85% -7.4% -15.73% $79.49 $79.45 2012-2013 N/A $72.69 76% -8.7% -23.09% $73.04 $73.02 2013-2014 N/A $70.61 48% -3.0% -25.41% $71.46 $71.49 2014-2015 N/A $68.94 9% -2.5% -27.26% $70.24 $70.79 *Note that the "Cost-of-Service w/Solar Costs Only" column does not reflect the SREC benefit the City will receive since the SREC prices are currently unknown **Assumes solar generation will start in June 2011 5

Page 93

2.0 – BUDGET REPORT 2.1 – VARIANCE REPORT Budget Actual Variance Dec-10 Dec-10 Dec-10 Load Forecast 58,125 63,566 (5,441) Power Supply Power Supply $3,785,224 $3,737,702 $47,522 Power Supply Management $186,783 $190,422 ($3,639) Capacity Charges - Load $1,025,694 $1,078,287 ($52,593) PJM Charges - Load $989,182 $1,623,087 ($633,905) Total - Power Supply $5,986,883 $6,629,499 ($642,616) Generation Plant Operations $490,515 $650,730 ($160,215) Generation Fuel $0 $0 $0 Capacity Credits ($1,002,527) ($1,002,528) $0 PJM Credits ($34,875) ($34,012) ($863) Total - Generation ($546,888) ($385,810) ($161,078) Emission Allowance Sales Total - Emission Allowance Sales $0 $0 $0 Total Power Supply & Generation $5,439,996 $6,243,689 ($803,694) Total Power Supply, Generation & Emission Sales $5,439,996 $6,243,689 ($803,694) Unit Costs Total – Power Supply $103.00 $104.29 ($1.29) Total - Generation + Emission Sales ($9.41) ($6.07) ($3.34) Final Cost of Service to City of Dover Ratepayers $93.59 $98.22 ($4.63) 6

Page 94

Budget Actual Variance YTD YTD YTD Load Forecast 388,917 403,114 (14,196) Power Supply Power Supply $25,641,214 $25,202,312 $438,902 Power Supply Management $1,158,784 $1,192,945 ($34,161) Capacity Charges - Load $6,087,992 $6,398,107 ($310,115) PJM Charges - Load $6,071,508 $7,734,611 ($1,663,103) Total - Power Supply $38,959,497 $40,527,974 ($1,568,477) Generation Plant Operations $2,670,528 $3,110,417 ($439,889) Generation Fuel $191,020 $3,138,177 ($2,947,157) Capacity Credits ($5,950,486) ($5,961,780) $11,294 PJM Credits ($440,748) ($5,278,531) $4,837,783 Total - Generation ($3,529,686) ($4,991,717) $1,462,031 Emission Allowance Sales Total - Emission Allowance Sales $0 $3,445 ($3,445) Total Power Supply & Generation $35,429,811 $35,536,257 ($106,446) Total Power Supply, Generation & Emission Sales $35,429,811 $35,539,702 ($109,891) Unit Costs Total – Power Supply $100.17 $100.54 ($0.36) Total - Generation + Emission Sales ($9.08) ($12.37) $3.30 Final Cost of Service to City of Dover Ratepayers $91.10 $88.16 $2.94 7

Page 95

2.2 – VARIANCE ANALYSIS Power Supply • Power Supply realized a favorable $47 thousand variance compared to the budget. This favorable variance was primarily due to the timing of Dover’s options purchase and payment of the associated premium. During FY2009-10 the City of Dover purchased Options as insurance to protect Dover from incremental energy cost exposure. The current City of Dover power supply and generation budget indicates that 100% of this purchase was expensed as a Power Supply Cost in the FY2009-10 period, however the FY2010-11 budget accrues this expense monthly. • PJM Charges for Load experienced a negative $634 thousand variance relative to the monthly budget. This variance was driven by Dover’s open position, which was 55% higher than budget. A larger volume of open positions, coupled with higher than projected PJM energy open prices, resulted in a total Open Position cost that was $572 thousand greater than budget. Secondary factors associated with this unfavorable variance include: a $96 thousand unfavorable variance in Basis costs, a $55 thousand Transmission Cost increase (in June PJM raised the transmission costs going forward due to the transmission owner’s update of its annual network service requirements and rates), a $13 thousand unfavorable variance in Transmission Rights Credits, and a $26 thousand unfavorable variance in PJM ancillary charges. Offsetting these unfavorable variances were a $115 thousand favorable variance in Load Following and a $13.5 thousand favorable variance in the Transmission Loss Refund. • Capacity Charges for Load realized a negative $53 thousand variance relative to the monthly budget. This variance is the result of PJM finalizing its new prices for the FY 2010-11 PJM Base Residual Auction. These revised prices, which became effective in June 2010, resulted in a 5% increase in the per MW-day UCAP charge applicable to Dover (increasing the rate to $187.34/MW-day). PJM also adjusted the Interruptible Load for Reliability (ILR) resources cost for the Delivery Year relative to the Forecasted RTO IRL Obligation in a manner that negatively impacts Dover. These charges will result in unfavorable variances each month during the current fiscal year. • For the month an unfavorable $586 thousand net variance between Power Supply (fixed positions) and PJM Charges for Load (open positions, transmission, etc.) was realized due to an unfavorable $459 thousand variance, caused by a change in volume, and an unfavorable $127 thousand variance, caused by a change in price. Hence, 78% of the unfavorable variance can be attributed to volume changes with 22% of the unfavorable variance being attributed to price changes. • The Power Supply Management variance is merely an estimate at this point. 8

Page 96

Generation • Plant O&M reported an unfavorable variance of $160 thousand compared to the monthly O&M Budget of $491 thousand. The principal reasons for this unfavorable variance were (i) higher than expected electric demand charges, (ii) increases in contractual services and right of ways costs and (iii) unbudgeted repair costs associated with Unit 3 boiler. 9

Page 97

3.0 – ENERGY MANAGEMENT 3.1 – PURCHASED POWER Management Highlights • Dover’s December load was 63,566 MWh, which was 9.3% above the weather normalized load of 58,125 MWh. Hedge volumes accounted for 75.8% of actual load for the month. • The December All In Unit Energy cost (excluding capacity) of $87.33 per MWh is $1.98 per MWh higher than the monthly budget. Actual Load vs Budget Load 100,000 75,000 MWh 50,000 25,000 0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Budget Actual 10

Page 98

All In Unit Energy Cost - Actual v Budget $92 $90 $88 $86 $/MWh $84 $82 $80 $78 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Budget ($/MWh) Actual ($/MWh) Budget WA Actual WA 11

Page 99

Purchased Power Variance Report Budget Actual Variance Dec-10 Dec-10 Dec-10 City of Dover Load Load Obligation (MWh) 58,125 63,566 (5,441) Unit Energy Costs ($ per MWh) Energy Cost (inc. Load Following & Pace Fees) $79.32 $80.27 ($0.95) Pass Through $5.09 $6.14 ($1.05) Incentive Fees $0.95 $0.92 $0.02 Total - All In Unit Energy Cost $85.35 $87.33 ($1.98) Purchased Power Variance Analysis • The actual Dover load of 63,566 MWh was 9.3% above the projected December load of 58,125 MWh. • The All In Unit Energy Cost was $1.98 per MWh higher than budget due to increased open volume purchases, increased energy costs, an unfavorable basis variance and an increased transmission cost. Offsetting these negative variances were increased load following charges and higher than expected transmission related refunds. • The Management Incentive fee variance on a $/MWh basis is merely an estimate at this point. PJM Power Balancing and Load Related Fees Purchased Power (Hedges): 48,200 MWhs @ $77.54/MWh: $3,737,702 Power Balancing; Additional PJM, and Energy Manager Fee6: $2,891,797 Total Cost to Serve Load (63,566 MWhs) $6,629,499 All In $/MWh load cost inclusive of Energy Management Fees: $104.29/MWh 6 Includes estimated Incentive Fees. 12

Page 100

3.2 – GENERATION MANAGEMENT • During the month, PJM did not dispatch Dover’s units into the market. The budget did not expect any generation for the month. Generation MWh's: Actual v Budget 30,000 25,000 20,000 MWh 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Budget Gen Actual Gen 13

Page 101

2010-11 Generation Production Margin v Budget $1,500 Thousands $1,250 $1,000 $750 $500 $250 $0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Budget ($) Actual ($) 14

Page 102

Generation Management Variance Report Budget Actual Variance Dec-10 Dec-10 Dec-10 Self-Supplied Capacity from Gen (MW) McKee Run 1 17 17 0 McKee Run 2 17 17 0 McKee Run 3 100.3 100.3 0 Van Sant 39 39 0 Self Supplied Capacity from Gen (MW) 173.3 173.3 0 Additional Capacity from PJM Incremental Auction 1.7 1.7 0 Total Capacity from Gen (MW) 175 175 0 Gen Capacity Sales to PJM ($/MW.d) $186.12 $186.12 $0.00 Incremental Auction Sales to PJM ($/MW.d) $50.00 $50.00 $0.00 Power Sales Power Sales (MWh) 0 0 0 Sales Revenue ($ per MWh) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Power Sales Revenue ($) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Variable Fuel & Transport Fuel Oil No.2 Volume - McKee (gal) 0 0 0 Fuel Oil No.2 - McKee ($/gal) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fuel Oil No.2 Cost of Goods Sold - McKee ($) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fuel Oil No.2 Volume - Van Sant (gal) 0 0 0 Fuel Oil No.2 - Van Sant ($/gal) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fuel Oil No.2 Cost of Goods Sold - Van Sant ($) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Gas Volume (Dth) 0 0 0 Unit Gas Price ($/Dth) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Variable Gas Cost ($) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Transport ($) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Variable Gas and Transport Costs ($) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Variable Fuel & Transport Costs ($) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Testing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Generation Production Margin $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Generation Capacity Payment Total - Generation Capacity Payment ($1,002,527) ($1,002,528) $0 15

Page 103

Generation Management Variance Analysis Fuel Expense • PJM did not dispatch Dover’s units into the market, nor did the units consume natural gas or fuel oil related to power generation. Generation Production Margin Transaction Volumes Revenue/(Cost) PJM Invoice for Power Sold 0 MWhs $0 Fuel and Transport 0 Dth gas/0 gal #6 oil $0 0 gal #2 oil Generation Production Margin 0 MWhs $0 The following non-production energy revenues and costs are generally fixed and are not directly related to generation dispatch and power production. Effective September 2009 FERC approved the City of Dover’s reactive supply service compensation resulting in approximately $29 thousand of revenue per month. PJM Invoice (Black Start) $4,545 Reactive Supply Credit $29,468 Fuel Oil Tank Heating & Black Start Gas Supply $0 Eastern Shore Demand Charge $0 Eastern Shore Transport and Imbalance Charge $0 Transco Demand Charge $0 Non-Production Energy Revenue/(Costs) $34,013 16

Page 104

Fuel and Transportation • During the month there were no unit dispatches by PJM. Date Volume (Dth) Price ($/Dth) Total Commodity Cost ($) Hess Corp Sub-Total 0 $0.00 $0.00 PESCO Sub-Total 0 $0.00 $0.00 NJNG Sub-Total 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 0 $0.00 $0.00 Due to the conversion from #6 residual oil to low sulfur #2 oil, the need for a constant supply of natural gas to heat the #6 oil is no longer required. Some gas will still be required for winter space heating of the building(s). Pace will coordinate with NAES on the procurement of such supply. This expense will now fall under the plant’s utility costs and be paid and budgeted for by the station. 17

Page 105

Gas Transportation Purchased City of Dover decided not to renew agreements with the Eastern Shore Natural Gas Pipeline (“ESNG”) and TransCo to provide firm natural gas deliveries to the McKee Run and Van Sant stations. The City of Dover previously notified ESNG and TransCo of its intent to terminate these existing firm capacity agreements and, as a result, the City no longer pays firm demand charges or adjustments. ESNG FT Demand Charge $ 0 TransCo FT Demand Charge $ 0 Total Purchases $ 0 Other Gas Purchases Commodity and transportation imbalances on Eastern Shore Pipeline for the month resulted in no charge. The components of this charge are summarized as follows: Eastern Shore Transport and Imbalance Charges Imbalance/Dth Estimated Cost/Dth Estimated Total Cost 0 $0.00 $0.00 Transport Volume/Dth $/Dth Total Cost Firm/IT 0 $0.00 $0.00 Net Charge $0.00 18

Page 106

Purchased Commodity Fuel Oil Summary Neither McKee Run nor Van Sant was dispatched into PJM and no #2 fuel oil was consumed for the month. The McKee Run tank must maintain 3 days of load equivalent dispatches for its units. The McKee Run tank must maintain 3 days of load equivalent dispatches for its units. Tank Inventory Estimates as of December 31 Tank Tank Capacity Inventory In Days of Burn (gallon) (gallon) (Typical Dispatch7) McKee Run (#2 Fuel 2,554,105 452,525 3 Oil) Van Sant 258,000 140,065 3 (#2 Fuel Oil) 7 As measured by tank level instruments. Tank levels may change due to oil temperature. 19

Page 107

3.3 – EMISSIONS AND ALLOWANCE MANAGEMENT Given the regulatory uncertainty surrounding the allowance markets, Dover has elected not to include revenues from emission allowance sales in its 2010-2011 fiscal year budget. Dover purchased and retired 53 NOX seasonal allowances on November 23rd in order to meet their 2010 NOX seasonal compliance position. Dover has the appropriate number of allowances were set aside for retirement (see Exhibit 1). Exhibit 1: Emissions and Allowance Summary through November 30, 2010 2010-2011 EMISSIONS & ALLOWANCE SUMMARY SO2 NOx Date Action Allowance Sale Revenue1 Allowance Sale Revenue1 Allocation Price Allocation2 Price Seas. Ann. 1/1/08 2007 Carryover 549 0 -- -- -- 1/1/09 2008 Carryover 2,691 0 1/1/09 Initial 2009 2,723 -- -- 51 78 -- -- Allocation 2/1/10 Initial 2010 1,988 49 76 Allocation N/A 2003-2006 139 Carryover 9/29/09 SO2 Sales (1,500) 11/12/09 NOX Ann. Sales (45) 11/13/09 SO2 Sales (1,410) 11/20/09 NOx Seas. Sales (25) 12/31/09 2009 YTD (1) -- -- (6) (13) -- -- Emissions3 12/31/10 2010 YTD (2) -- -- (54) (54) -- -- Emissions 6/1/10 State Re- -- -- -- 3 2 -- -- allocation 10/31/10 EPA Linearity (68) TBD Testing Req. 11/23/10 Market Purchase 53 Totals - Allowances 5,177 -- $0 2 44 -- $0 $0 $0 Total Revenue $0 Notes: (1) Revenue calculations account for a $0.50/ton broker fee for SO2, $10/ton broker fee for NOx annual and $5/ton broker fee for NOX seasonal. (2) Per the Clean Air Interstate Rule, in 2009 NOx emissions will be governed by a seasonal and annual program. The NOx seasonal emissions pertain only to emissions (May 1 – Sep 30), similar to the previous trading regimen. Annual emissions cover the entire year. 20

Page 108

Given current dispatch expectations, the market value of the remaining 2007-2010 Dover allowance inventory is approximately $38,699 at the time of this report. This represents 3,191 pre-CAIR SO2 allowances trading at $9/ton, 1,986 post-CAIR SO2 allowances8 trading at $5/ton, and 2 NOx seasonal allowances trading at $25/ton. SO2 SO2 prices continue to hover around $10/ton for vintage 2009 or earlier, and $5/ton for vintage 2010 or later (see Figure 1 – SO2 Prices since Last Monthly Report). No substantial change is expected in the price of SO2 allowances until either EPA releases a final version of the Clean Air Transport Rule (Transport Rule) or Congress intervenes with legislation. If the Transport Rule is finalized in a form similar to that of the proposed rule, Pace Global’s expectation is that the existing bank of SO2 allowances will not be permitted for compliance. Figure 1 – SO2 Prices since Last Monthly Report SO2 Allowance Prices (Dec / Jan) $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 12/16/2010 12/18/2010 12/20/2010 12/22/2010 12/24/2010 12/26/2010 12/28/2010 12/30/2010 1/1/2011 1/3/2011 1/5/2011 1/7/2011 1/9/2011 1/11/2011 1/13/2011 1/15/2011 1/17/2011 1/19/2011 2009 (pre‐CAIR) 2010/2011 (post‐CAIR) NOx The NOX annual allowance market continued to gain momentum and allowances are currently trading at their highest levels since late October 2010 (See Figure 2 – NOX annual prices since last monthly report.) Pace Global is currently working with Dover and NAES in evaluating the potential need to purchase additional NOX annual allowances to cover Dover’s 2010 emissions. 8 Pace Global is assuming and recommending that Dover retire vintage 2010 SO2 allowances for their 2010 emissions. Per CAIR, 2010 or later vintage allowances are worth half of a ton for compliance purposes. Given the regulatory and legislative uncertainty surrounding the SO2 markets and the greater value 2009 allowances have for compliance purposes, Pace Global recommends retaining 2009 vintage allowances over 2010 vintage allowances when possible. 21

Page 109

The deadline for purchase and retirement of allowances, should such a transaction be necessary, is March 1, 2011. NOX seasonal prices continue to fluctuate between $25/ton and $30/ton and little movement is expected as units generate in the non-ozone-season months (See Figure 3 – NOX seasonal prices since last monthly report.) Under the proposed Transport Rule, it is unclear how existing NOX allowances (both annual and seasonal) will be treated for compliance purposes. The rule contemplates a number of methods for dealing with the existing NOX banks, including permitting use for compliance at a discounted rate. Current expectation is that the existing bank will not be permitted to carry over into the new program. Figure 2 – NOX annual prices since last monthly report NOX Annual Allowance Prices (Dec / Jan) $360.00 $340.00 $320.00 $300.00 $280.00 $260.00 $240.00 $220.00 $200.00 12/16/2010 12/18/2010 12/20/2010 12/22/2010 12/24/2010 12/26/2010 12/28/2010 12/30/2010 1/1/2011 1/3/2011 1/5/2011 1/7/2011 1/9/2011 1/11/2011 1/13/2011 1/15/2011 1/17/2011 1/19/2011 22

Page 110

Figure 3 – NOX seasonal prices since last monthly report NOX Seasonal Allowance Prices (Dec / Jan) $31.00 $30.00 $29.00 $28.00 $27.00 $26.00 $25.00 $24.00 $23.00 $22.00 12/16/2010 12/18/2010 12/20/2010 12/22/2010 12/24/2010 12/26/2010 12/28/2010 12/30/2010 1/1/2011 1/3/2011 1/5/2011 1/7/2011 1/9/2011 1/11/2011 1/13/2011 1/15/2011 1/17/2011 1/19/2011 SO2 and NOx Outlook The SO2 and NOX markets continue to operate in a state of regulatory uncertainty. While the proposed Transport Rule provides some guidance, the final version is not expected to be released until June 2011. EPA recently released some changes and alternative methodologies to those originally included in the proposed rule. On January 7, 2011, EPA issued 2 alternative methodologies for calculating allowance allocations to units covered by the program. The original methodology contemplated in the proposed rule would have calculated allowance allocations based on historical emissions and expected future emissions – determined by an EPA model. Under the original methodology, Dover’s two covered units would have received minimal allowances via allocation (See Figure 4 - Dover Allowance Allocation under Original Proposed Transport Rule). Figure 4 - Dover Allowance Allocation under Original Proposed Transport Rule Original Transport Rule Allocations Ozone Annual Season 2012 SO2 2014 SO2 NOx NOx Plant Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation McKee Run 2 2 0 14 Van Sant Station 0 0 5 1 Total 2 2 5 15 23

Page 111

Under the two alternative methodologies, allowance allocations would be based on a unit’s three highest annual heat input values within the previous five years. The second alternative allocation methodology places a limiter on some units if their “reasonably foreseeable maximum emissions” are higher than what they would receive simply using historical heat input. The limiter would not impact Dover directly, but would increase to overall pool from which Dover would be eligible to pull from, thus slightly increasing their total allowances. In either case, Dover receives substantially more allowances under the new proposed allocation methods (see Figure 5 – Allowance Allocations under EPA’s Alternative Methodologies.) Figure 5 – Allowance Allocations under EPA’s Alternative Methodologies New Alternative Transport Rule Allocations: Option 1 Ozone Annual Season 2012 SO2 2014 SO2 NOx NOx Plant Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation McKee Run 45 45 36 17 Van Sant Station 3 3 3 1 Total 48 48 38 18 New Alternative Transport Rule Allocations: Option 2 Ozone Annual Season 2012 SO2 2014 SO2 NOx NOx Plant Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation McKee Run 50 50 37 17 Van Sant Station 4 4 3 1 Total 53 53 40 19 As the 112th Congress settles in, the talk of limiting EPA’s existing regulatory authority is increasing. Expectation is that at some point this year Senator Carper (D-DE) will make a push for a “3-pollutant” bill, which would regulate the SO2 and NOX emissions markets. It is likely that Carper’s bill would provide a smoother transition from the current rules under CAIR than that of the Transport Rule by allowing current allowances to retain some value for future compliance. Additionally, there have been rumblings amongst the new members of Congress that they will push to siphon EPA’s regulatory budget, however those efforts are more likely to be directed at CO2 regulation than SO2 and NOX. 24

Page 112

RGGI and Federal Carbon Outlook RGGI allowance prices continue to flounder around the statutory floor price of $1.86/ton. RGGI is substantially over supplied and as a result allowances prices have remained extremely low (see Error! Reference source not found.). Figure 6 – RGGI Allowance Prices RGGI Prices (Dec / Jan) $1.95 $1.90 $1.85 $1.80 12/17/2010 12/19/2010 12/21/2010 12/23/2010 12/25/2010 12/27/2010 12/29/2010 12/31/2010 1/2/2011 1/4/2011 1/6/2011 1/8/2011 1/10/2011 1/12/2011 1/14/2011 1/16/2011 1/18/2011 1/20/2011 The conversion potential of RGGI allowances into federal allowance volume in a national carbon market remains the main support for RGGI pricing. However, with major uncertainty surrounding the ultimate ability to pass legislation in the near-term, RGGI allowance prices continue to remain very low. Based on projected generation and emissions, Dover is projected to have an excess of 150,000 allowances through 2013 with a market value at current prices of $291,000. The first true-up period for RGGI will take place on December 31st, 2011. Despite the high level of uncertainty surrounding carbon legislation, Pace Global continues to anticipate an eventual price on carbon at a national level, although the timing, method, and scope of coverage are all substantially unknown at this time. Pace Global expects carbon regulation to evolve through three main drivers: 1. Legislation; 2. EPA regulation under their existing authority; and 3. Linkage of regional and state initiatives. The third peg of these drivers, regional and state initiatives, got a major boost on December 16, 2010, as the California Air Resource Board approved rules for a cap-and-trade program that will begin in 2012. The carbon pricing three drivers will likely develop in parallel and, at times, in concert with one another. Through the three drivers, Pace Global anticipates a national price on carbon emissions via a market based system, or combination of systems, beginning sometime between 2014 and 2017. 25

Page 113

4.0 – OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Management Highlights • During the month of December, there were no restricted work days or lost time accidents. The facility has now gone 78 days without an OSHA recordable accident and 78 consecutive days without a lost time reportable accident. • The plant received no Notice of Violations (NOVs). There were no environmental deviations or other permit deviations during the month. • No units were dispatched by PJM for the month of December. • Mechanical staff completed the installation of the new atomizing air dryer and installed piping to the existing system to better utilize the new air compressor during times when the unit is off line for economics. • IC&E staff installed two new batteries for the Van Sant fire protection system control cabinet. • IC&E staff completed sixteen hours of DCS training from Warren Professionals. • The draft O&M budget was supplied to Pace Global for review in early December and was approved. The draft FY11-12 budget must be entered into HTE no later than 1/3/2011. • The following is the NAES Monthly Report as submitted to PGAM. 26

Page 114

NAES Corporation Dover, Delaware December 2010 Monthly Report Happy Holidays from McKee Run Generating Station 27

Page 115

Table of Contents 1.0 Environmental, Health and Safety 2.0 Financial 3.0 Operations 4.0 Maintenance 5.0 CIP 6.0 General Plant Information 7.0 Summary of NAES Performance 28

Page 116

1.0 Environmental, Health and Safety: During the month of December, there were no restricted work days or lost time accidents. The facility has now gone 78 days without an OSHA recordable accident and 78 consecutive days without a lost time reportable accident. The plant received no Notice of Violations (NOVs). There were no environmental deviations or other permit deviations during the month. Environmental, Health and Safety Statistics Month Fiscal Year to Date (December 10) (7/1/10-6/30/11) NOVs 0 0 Opacity Deviations 0 9 Environmental Deviations 0 0 OSHA Recordable 0 1 OSHA LTA's 0 0 First Aid cases 0 0 Restricted Workday Accident 0 0 Near Miss 0 3 Man Hours Worked 3,596.00 78,448.75 Date last OSHA Recordable 10/14/10 Date last Lost Time Accident 10/14/10 Days since last OSHA recordable 78 Days since last Lost Time Accident 78 Emissions (NOx & SO2) All data thru 12/31/10 NOx Summary - Year (May-Sept.)Tons Year Unit #1 Unit #2 Unit #3 Unit #11 TOTAL 2009 0.9 0.7 4.2 0.6 6.4 2010 0.7 2.2 119.2 3.3 125.4 2011 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NOx Summary - Year (Jan. – Dec.)Tons Year Unit #1 Unit #2 Unit #3 Unit #11 TOTAL 2009 0.9 0.7 10.1 0.6 12.3 2010 0.7 2.2 119.2 3.3 125.4 2011 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29

Page 117

CAIR NOx Allowances Summary* NOx Allowances Available NOx Allowance Balance CAIR NOx CAIR NOx (Per Facility, Prior to Sale) Total NOx Allowance Allowances McKee Run Tons Vintage Sold YTD (Yr/Season) Van Sant Emitted McKee Run Van Sant (Yr/Season) (Yr/ (Yr/Season) (Yr/Season) Season) 2009 45/25 75*/50* 5/3 12/5 - 1/1 18/19 4/2 2010 0 73/47* 5/3 119**/119** -46/-72 2/0 - 3/3 Note *- State Reallocation for McKee Run 2 tons Year 2009, 2 tons Ozone Season 2009 and 1 ton Ozone Season 2010. Note ** - The higher NOx emissions are attributed to data substitution rules that use significantly higher emission rates than actually were emitted. The implementation of the data substitution rules were caused by performing a linearity test outside the grace period. NAES ESS was able to provide assistance in reducing the NOx emissions from 137 tons to 119 tons since the October report. They are also investigating another option with the EPA that could reduce the emissions further. As of December 31, 2010, the EPA has informed NAES that they will review the petition once they reconvene in January 2011. SO2 Summary - Year (Jan.-Dec.)Tons Year Unit #1 Unit #2 Unit #3 Unit #11 TOTAL 2009 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.4 2010 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 2011 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Denoted data is as of 10/31/2010 from EDR submittal to EPA SO2 Allowances Summary SO2 Allowances Available Total SO2 SO2 (Per Unit, Prior to Sale & Tons Emitted SO2 SO2 Allowance Allowances Reconciliation) – Allowances Vintage Sold - YTD U3 and U11 Balance Unit #3 Unit #11 YTD 2003-2006 139 138 1 0 0 2007 2455 2585 138 98 170 2008 2392 2585 138 32 299 2009 0 2585 138 0 2723 2010 0 1850 138 0 1987 2011 0 1850 138 0 1988 Note: Denoted data is as of 12/31/2010 30

Page 118

CO2 Allowances Summary* CO2 CO2 CO2 Allowances Available Total CO2 CO2 Allowance Allowances (Per Facility, Prior to Tons Emitted Allowance Vintage Sold YTD Sale) Balance McKee Run Van Sant 2009 0 59,805 1,699 5,796 55,708 2010 0 47,844 1,636 32,971 16,509 2011 0 35,883 1,227 0 37,110 2012 0 23,922 818 0 24,740 2013 0 11,961 409 0 12,370 Note: All CO2 allowance values are provided by the RGGI CO2 Allowance Tracking System 31

Page 119

2.0 Financial Financial – Current Month Month –December 2010 Actual Budget Variance Personnel 364,064 359,899 (4,165) Materials & Supplies 6,044 7,650 1,606 Administrative Expenses 280,622 122,966 (157,656) Total $650,730 $490,515 ($160,215) Financial – Fiscal Year to Date Number of Months - 6 Actual Budget Variance Personnel 1,536,436 1,545,489 9,053 Materials & Supplies 174,043 93,570 (80,473) Administrative Expenses 1,399,939 1,031,469 (368,470) Total $3,110,418 $2,670,528 ($439,890) 2.1 Variance analysis: The original budget for December was $490,515. The actual expenses for December were $650,730 for an unfavorable variance of $160,215 or approximately 32.66%. The variance was due to the following: PERSONNEL EXPENSES – The extension of the current Collective Bargaining Agreement by the company and by the union provided for a wage increase retroactive to July 1, 2010. This increase was expensed in December 2010, although it was offset somewhat by lower labor, overtime, and burdens during the month which contributed to a total unfavorable variance of $4,165. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES EXPENSES – A favorable variance of $1,606 was realized due to lower spending in Printing/Duplicating, Medical Supplies and Building Maintenance. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES - Higher than budgeted expenses in Electric, Contractual Services, Right of Ways/Permits, Boiler Systems and Turbine Generator Systems contributed to an unfavorable variance of $157,656. The variance in the Electric account is due to the increased run time in July, which due to plant equipment configuration change (running auxiliaries off the Unit 3 Start-up Transformer) caused a significant increase in the monthly ratcheting demand charge. Boiler Systems incurred an unfavorable variance due to unexpected costs associated with Unit 3 Boiler tube leak repairs. The budget is currently forecast to finish this fiscal year at $6,176,631 expensed versus $5,689,315 budgeted thereby realizing a 108.6% expenditure rate. The high expenditure rate is due primarily to increased unit operation time which to a large scale directly led to an increase in electric and water costs over the original budget. In addition, operational limits created a need for alternate auxiliary power sources that resulted in a higher demand charge for electricity which will continue throughout the rest of the fiscal year and into the next fiscal year. 32

Page 120

3.0 Operations Unit Operations / Outages / Trips No units were dispatched by PJM for the month of December. Month – December 2010 McKee McKee McKee MRS Van Sant Total Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Facility Unit 11 All Units Capacity MW 17 17 102 136 39 175 On Line Hours Hrs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Starts # 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gross Generation MWh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Net Generation MWh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Auxiliaries MWh 34.824 34.824 155.209 224.857 8.345 233.202 Auxiliaries purchased MWh 34.824 34.824 155.209 224.857 8.345 233.202 Fuel Gas Used MMBTU 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fuel Oil Used MMBTU 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fuel Oil Used Gallons 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Fuel MMBTU 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Net Heat Rate BTU/KWh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unit Trips # 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capacity Factor % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Availability Factor % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Commercial % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unavailability (CU) Planned Outage Hours Hours 493.50 493.50 493.50 1,480.50 0.0 1,480.50 Maintenance Outage Hours 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hours Forced Outage Hours Hours 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Reserve Shutdown Hours 744.00 744.00 744.00 2,232.00 744.00 2,976.00 Hours HW Boiler Gas Usage MMBTU 1,250.106 1,250.106 Pilot Gas Usage MMBTU 0 0 0 0 # Note: Does not include HWB or Pilot Gas. Fuel usage numbers are taken from fuel flow instruments. 33

Page 121

2010-2011 Fiscal Year-to-Date (6 Months) McKee McKee McKee MRS Van Sant Total Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Facility Unit 11 All Units Capacity MW 17 17 102 136 39 175 On Line Hours Hrs 13.033 128.966 625.956 767.955 129.627 897.582 Starts # 1 3 43 47 24 71 Gross Generation MWh 154.626 1,216.601 44,513.459 45,884.686 4,334.660 50,219.346 Net Generation MWh 147.111 1,141.623 41,999.488 43,588.222 4,331.722 49,919.944 Total Auxiliaries MWh 191.947 259.409 4,728.140 5,179.496 19.150 5,198.646 Auxiliaries purchased MWh 184.432 184.432 2,218.413 2,587.277 16.722 2,603.999 Fuel Gas Used MMBTU 2,183.250 15,245.85 445,263.45 462,692.55 53,766.951 516,459.50 0 1 1 1 Fuel Oil Used MMBTU 0.0 0.0 12,488.410 12,488.410 135.922 12,624.332 Fuel Oil Used Gallons 0.0 0.0 87,457 87,457 982 88,439 Total Fuel MMBTU 2,183.250 15,245.85 457,751.86 475,180.96 57,492.169 532,673.13 0 1 1 0 Net Heat Rate BTU/KWh 14,841 13,355 11,047 13,081 13,234 13,158 Unit Trips # 1 0 3 4 2 6 Capacity Factor % 0.20 1.52 9.14 5.81 2.51 7.07 Availability Factor % 56.84 69.97 69.83 65.54 100.00 74.16 Commercial % 6.6 0 0.03* 0.85 0 0.66 Unavailability (CU) Planned Outage Hours Hours 1,326.500 1,326.500 1,326.500 3,979.500 0.0 3,979.500 Maintenance Outage Hours 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hours Forced Outage Hours Hours 579.830 0 6.317 586.15 0 586.15 Reserve Shutdown Hours 2,510.670 2,961.534 2,529.443 8,001.647 4,287.373 12,288.647 Hours HW Boiler Gas Usage MMBTU 1,586.106 1,586.106 Pilot Gas Usage MMBTU 0 0 0 0 Note: * Calculation does not include 3.317 hours that were Outside Management Control (OMC) Capacity Testing – FY 2010-2011 Summer 2010 (June 1- Aug 31) Winter 2010-2011 (Dec 1- Mar 1) Unit Rated Net Reported Net Unit Rated Net Reported Net Capability (MW) Capability (MW) Capability (MW) Capability (MW) 1 17 17.20 1 17 * 2 17 18.09 2 17 * 3 102 102.68 3 102 * VanSant 39 39.30 11 39 * Total 175 178.67 Total 175 * Winter Capacity Test Exemption Program Note: * depicts a unit that has not completed capacity test for the PJM Winter Capacity Demonstration Period in FY 2010-2011. All City of Dover Units were in the revised PJM 34

Page 122

Fuel Oil Inventory Monthly Monthly Fuel Monthly FY 10-11 Fuel FY 10-11 Inventory Inventory Purchases Inventory Inventory Purchases Inventory (Start) (End) (Month) (Change) (Start) (YTD) (Change) McKee Run (#2 Fuel Oil) 454,725 452,525 0 (2,200) 448,556 82,623* 3,969 Van Sant 140,065 140,065 0 0 143,099 0 (3,034) (#2 Fuel Oil) Note: As measured by tank level instruments. Tank levels may change due to oil temperature. Note: * An oil purchase was made in October, 2010 for #2 oil to replenish oil stocks used during testing of Unit 3 during the summer period. Approximately 53,000 gallons were received in October 2010 and 30,007 gallons were delivered in the first week of November to complete the purchase. Van Sant Lifetime through 12/31/10 Actual Starts Factored Starts Fired Hours Van Sant 1240 2147.65 4100.86 Since HGP - Dec 2004 189 479.95 717.28 Team Report: Plant employees continue working on their General Physics topics during the month. The inclusion of these courses has provided opportunities for increased knowledge of plant operations, to satisfy OSHA and PJM requirements, and to build a solid foundation for cross training employees at the City of Dover generation facilities. Many of these courses are included in the Employee Qualification program that will help prepare operators for advancement within the line of progression jobs. Operation teams have been re-organizing and removing obsolete MSDS sheets to be placed in the inactive files. The notebooks which contain the active MSDS sheets were replaced and new storage area has been provided that will allow for easier access. Operations teams have been assisting the Maintenance Team in remodeling an office area that was formerly used as a storage area. The area will now be used as an office area for the Materials Coordinator within the main plant. File cabinets, a desk and other support equipment and material have been moved into the office and is almost fully operational. 35

Page 123

4.0 Maintenance During the month of December, plant maintenance staff continued addressing the backlog of work orders. There were sixty-five work orders issued with fifty-three work orders being completed during the month. The table below summarizes the monthly work order activities. Work Order Report December - 0 Outstanding From Outstanding Previous Issued This Completed at the end of Priority # Months Month This Month the month 1 11 1 9 3 2 17 11 9 19 3 37 11 17 31 4 9 10 1 18 5 7 0 0 7 SW1 0 0 0 0 SW2 0 0 0 0 SW3 1 0 0 1 SW4 0 1 0 1 SW5 0 0 0 0 PM 29 31 17 43 Totals 111 65 53 123 Note: PM's are included in the priority totals Notable activities during the month include: 1) Mechanical staff completed the installation of the new atomizing air dryer and installed piping to the existing system to better utilize the new air compressor during times when the unit is off line for economics. 2) IC&E staff installed two new batteries for the Van Sant fire protection system control cabinet. Fire protection alarm panel was activated when the batteries reached their serviceable life. 3) IC&E staff completed sixteen hours of DCS training from Warren Professionals. Training was held on the Unit 3 Net 90 system controls. Training consisted of navigation of systems, composer logic to actual hardware, graphic changes, finding components in drawings and navigating around drawings. 4) IC&E staff ran new cable from the Net 90 room to the CEMS room and field landed the new wires for the CEMS ON-Line - fuel being combusted detection. 36

Page 124

5) Mechanical staff prefabricated one hundred and twenty linear feet of stainless steel piping for replacement of the hydrogen line feeding units one and two generators. The replacement will be completed during the spring outage when both units are safely degassed for outage work. At that time, the new line will be installed and pressure tested for leaks. 5.0 Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Project Description Update Number Progress: The project has been completed except for some final MR Fire Protection training for personnel. Final drawings and documentation would then be EG0801 System Upgrades supplied to the plant to work towards closing out the project. Schedule: This work was completed in December. Progress: Additional molded case breakers that will lower the Arc Flash Exposure level have been received for replacement at McKee Run. Once the new breakers have been installed, all breaker cubicles will be MR & VS Arc Flash relabeled as necessary based on the updated Arc Flash Analysis which EG0904 Analysis would incorporate the new breaker ratings. It is expected that, as a result of all the modifications to the electrical system, a revised plant uniform policy could be implemented based on the final analysis. Schedule: Project is expected to be completed in January. Progress: This project has been completed. Final review of “as-built” Van Sant Mark IV EG1001 documents from the controls system vendor has been completed. Controls Upgrade Schedule: The project was closed out in December. Progress: All electrical equipment and mechanical equipment was tested and checked out for vibration. This work was completed on Unit 3 Cooling Tower EG1101 November 21. Life Extension Schedule: No other work is planned for this project during the remainder of the fiscal year. Progress: Work scope to replace the lower decking has been completed and is in the process of going out for bids to be completed in Units 1 & 2 Cooling EG1102 the Spring 2011 Outage. Tower Life Extension Schedule: Pre-bid meeting and bids are due by the middle of February 2011. Progress: Started on the development of the project work scope Unit 3 Turbine documents. EG1103 Schedule: This project has been deferred until 2011-2012 fiscal year. Inspection Progress: Started on the development of the project work scope Unit 3 Aux System documents. EG1104 Schedule: This project has been deferred until 2011-2012 fiscal year. Components 37

Page 125

Progress: This project is for the unexpected needs that may occur during a budget year that were unexpected due to equipment failure for Miscellaneous Capital example. EG1105 Equipment Schedule: The funding is in place. Some funds have been used to Replacements cover the cost of the Unit 3 600-lb steam station valve repairs, Unit 3 Cooling Water Booster Pump Repairs, and circuit breakers for the power distribution system. Progress: Started on the development of the project work scope document. EG1106 Unit 3 Stack Repairs Schedule: This project has been deferred until 2011-2012 fiscal year. Progress: Started on the development of the project work scope Units 1 & 2 Life documents. EG1107 Schedule: This is tentatively scheduled for the Spring Outage 2011. Extension Some of the work has been deferred until the 2011-2012 fiscal year. Progress: The repair work has been completed. Unit 1 Forced Outage Schedule: This work is complete and final disposition of the insurance EG1108 Repairs reimbursement submittal is outstanding. Progress: Started on the development of the project work scope Unit 3 FD & ID Fan documents. EG1109 Damper Upgrade Schedule: This project has been deferred until 2011-2012 fiscal year. Progress: Started on the development of the project work scope Unit 3 DCS Computers documents. EG1110 & Software Upgrades Schedule: This project has been deferred until 2011-2012 fiscal year. Progress: Started on the development of the project work scope Unit 3 Air Heater documents. EG1112 Expansion Joint Schedule: This is scheduled for the Spring Outage 2011. Progress: Started on the development of the project work scope Units 1 & 2 Controls documents and a parts list is almost ready to send to plant purchasing. EG1113 Modifications Schedule: This is scheduled for the Spring Outage 2011. Progress: Started on the development of the project work scope Unit 3 Gas Line documents. Gas valves have been ordered but not received. EG1114 Modifications Schedule: This is scheduled for the Spring Outage 2011. 38

Page 126

5.1 CIP Budget Approved Latest Project Description Budget Estimate Number ($ X 1000) ($ X 1000) EG0801 MR Fire Protection System Upgrades 50 45 EG0904 MR & VS Arc Flash Analysis Phase II 125 75* Unit 3 Cooling Tower Life Extension EG1101 398 380 Units 1 & 2 Cooling Tower Life EG1102 173 150 Extension EG1103 Unit 3 Turbine Inspection 348 348 EG1104 Unit 3 Aux System Components 113 113 EG1106 Unit 3 Stack Repairs 25 25 EG1107 Units 1 & 2 Life Extension 276 276 Unit 1 Forced Outage EG1108 412** 412 Repairs EG1109 Unit 3 FD & ID Fan Damper Upgrade 45 45 Unit 3 DCS Computers & Software EG1110 30 30 Upgrades EG1112 Unit 3 Air Heater Expansion Joint 65## 65 EG1113 Units 1 & 2 Controls Modifications 150## 150 EG1114 Unit 3 Gas Line Modifications 60## 60 * $50K removed and put into O&M budget - $41K was actual Phase I cost. The remaining $75K was put into the 2010 O&M budget. ** This project was not budgeted for 2011. ## Project was not in original FY11 CIP but was approved by COD Council in late 2010. 39

Page 127

6.0 General Plant Information Training: Plant employees continue working on their General Physics topics during the month. The inclusion of these courses has provided opportunities for increased knowledge of plant operations, to satisfy OSHA and PJM requirements, and to build a solid foundation for cross training employees at the City of Dover generation facilities. Many of these courses are included in the Employee Qualification program that will help prepare operators for advancement within the line of progression jobs. The PJM Generation Systems Operator exam study groups continue to meet during the month with different study topics. The study group focuses on subjects that are covered on the exam. This month’s topics were Reserves, Capacity Shortage, Supplementary Status Report, Transmission and Voltage Emergencies. During the month, new Safety committee members were selected to serve for the year 2011. The Plant Safety Committee consists of representatives from each of the Operations and from the Maintenance Team to aid in ensuring the plant and personnel remain safe by conducting area inspections, performing assessments, and bringing safety ideas and projects to the table that could aid in improving overall plant safety. Other Events: The draft budget was supplied to Pace Global for review in early December and was approved. The draft FY11-12 budget must be entered into HTE no later than 1/3/2011. Due to the amount of information needed to be inputted into the COD financial software, a time schedule was developed to ensure enough time is allocated for the data entry process. Calendar of Events Date Winter Capacity Period December 1, 2010 to February 28, 2011 McKee Run and Van Sant Title V Annual Certification Due February 1, 2011 NOx Emissions Reconciliation Due March 1, 2011 SO2 Emissions Reconciliation Due March 1, 2011 SARA III Report March 1, 2011 Annual Van Sant Black Start Test March 2011 (Exact Date TBD) Units 1, 2, and 3 Spring Outage March 28, 2011 – May 23, 3011 Unit 11 Spring Outage March 14, 2011 – March 28, 2011 40

Page 128

EIA-923 Report April 15, 2011 EIA-860 Report May 15, 2011 Fiscal Year 2010-20011 Ends June 30, 2011 PJM Summer Capacity Test Period June 1, 2011- August 31, 2011 McKee Run and Van Sant Title V Semi-Annual Certification Due August 1, 2011 NOx Ozone Season Starts May 1, 2011 NOx Ozone Season Ends September 30, 2011 One Year Accident Free October 14, 2011 #1 Unit Annual Inspection October , 2011 #2 Unit Annual Inspection October , 2011 7.0 Summary of NAES Performance to Date Plant Performance FY 2010-2011 Measure Month Year to Date YTD FY Maximum Incentive Incentive Commercial 0% 0.66% $63,262 $89,586 Unavailability (CU) Safety 1 1 $8,398 $16,797 Environmental 0 0 $16,797 $16,797 Capacity Tests Summer Winter Summer Winter Completed Unit 1 No No Yes Yes* $3,360 $3,360 Unit 2 No No Yes Yes* $3,360 $3,360 Unit 3 No No Yes Yes* $20,157 $20,157 Unit 11 No No Yes Yes* $6,719 $6,719 Total YTD 77.85% Total YTD Incentive $122,052 $156,775 Incentive % Note - * Unit is expected to be in the PJM Winter Capacity Test Exemption Program 41

Page 129

APPENDICES I. PJM INVOICE BREAKDOWN The PJM bill is a record of all Electricity Transactions, Transmission Services, Ancillary Services and Miscellaneous fees that allow the PJM to operate. Below is a list of the line items on the PJM bill including all generator activity. PJM Bill Line Items Gen Load Net Day Ahead Energy $0.00 ($1,296,295.64) ($1,296,295.64) Real-time Energy $0.00 ($29,910.19) ($29,910.19) Transmission Losses Credits $0.00 $93,229.70 $93,229.70 Network Integration Transmission Service Charges $0.00 ($270,028.60) ($270,028.60) Inadvertent Interchange Charges $0.00 ($944.40) ($944.40) Regulation Charges $0.00 ($25,272.85) ($25,272.85) Synchronized Reserve Charges $0.00 ($11,756.37) ($11,756.37) Balancing Operating Reserves Charges $0.00 ($26,314.26) ($26,314.26) Day Ahead Operating Reserves Charges $0.00 ($11,085.31) ($11,085.31) Day-ahead Scheduling Reserve $0.00 ($127.46) ($127.46) Synchronous Condensing Charges $0.00 ($56.16) ($56.16) Reactive Services Charges $0.00 ($1,554.76) ($1,554.76) Meter Correction Charges $0.00 $125.64 $125.64 Day-ahead Operating Reserve for Load Response $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Balancing Operating Reserve for Load Response $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Balancing Operating Reserves Credits $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Day Ahead Operating Reserves Credits $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Locational Reliability Charges $0.00 ($1,080,033.18) ($1,080,033.18) Capacity Transfer Rights Credits $0.00 $1,745.61 $1,745.61 Capacity Resource Deficiency Credits $0.00 $0.31 $0.31 Demand Response and ILR Compliance Penalty Credits $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 RPM Auction Credits $1,002,527.60 $0.00 $1,002,527.60 Auction Revenue Rights Credits $0.00 $31,448.26 $31,448.26 Synchronized Reserve Credits $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PJM Scheduling System Control and Dispatch Service Charges $0.00 ($9,882.62) ($9,882.62) Transmission Owner Scheduling System Control and Dispatch Service Charges $0.00 ($4,856.61) ($4,856.61) Reactive Supply and Voltage Control from Generation Sources Service Charges $0.00 ($33,905.93) ($33,905.93) Reactive Supply Credit $29,467.58 $0.00 $29,467.58 Black Start Service Charges $0.00 ($1,289.64) ($1,289.64) North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Charge $0.00 ($529.46) ($529.46) Reliability First Corporation (RFC) Charges $0.00 ($967.39) ($967.39) Expansion Cost Recovery Charges $0.00 ($438.03) ($438.03) Transmission Enhancement Charges $0.00 ($9,673.22) ($9,673.22) Black Start Service Credits $4,544.50 $0.00 $4,544.50 Non-Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service Credits $0.00 $451.83 $451.83 42

Page 130

Generation Deactivation $0.00 $794.40 $794.40 Market Monitoring Unit (MMU) Funding $0.00 ($330.80) ($330.80) Organization of PJM States, Inc. (OPSI) Funding $0.00 ($35.97) ($35.97) FERC Annual Recovery $0.00 ($4,078.73) ($4,078.73) PJM Annual Membership $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 EFOR-P $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 DPL Settlement B $0.00 $0.32 $0.32 PPA $0.00 ($9,802.88) ($9,802.88) $1,036,539.68 ($2,701,374.39) ($1,664,834.71) II. LOAD, ALL IN ENERGY AND ALL IN COST OF SERVICE TABLE Budget Load Actual Load Budget AIE Actual AIE Actual YTD AIE Budget AICS Actual AICS Actual YTD AICS (MWh) (MWh) ($/MWh) ($/MWh) ($/MWh) ($/MWh) ($/MWh) ($/MWh) Jul 77,912 83,163 $83.50 $90.72 $90.72 $92.25 $81.36 $81.36 Aug 76,267 78,755 $85.20 $82.76 $86.85 $89.62 $83.03 $82.17 Sep 64,317 66,782 $84.83 $82.73 $85.65 $90.04 $91.13 $84.79 Oct 58,076 56,452 $83.68 $79.72 $84.47 $89.77 $87.24 $85.27 Nov 54,220 54,396 $84.68 $82.56 $84.17 $91.53 $91.56 $86.28 Dec 58,125 63,566 $85.35 $87.33 $84.67 $93.59 $98.22 $88.16 Jan 60,136 $84.94 $92.76 Feb 54,199 $83.56 $91.20 Mar 56,334 $84.16 $90.46 Apr 52,554 $83.69 $91.16 May 58,744 $79.63 $85.58 Jun 67,331 $80.51 $96.23 43

Page 131

III. GLOSSARY Energy Only Unit Cost ("EOU") accounts for the wholesale energy costs excluding capacity obligations, capacity credits for Dover-owned generation, generation revenues, generating plant costs, the black start ancillary services credit for the Van Sant plant, and revenues associated with the sale of emission allowances. The AIE includes the costs from settling the hedged or forward transactions; the energy bought on the ISO (Independent System Operator or PJM) day-ahead to cover the open position (un-hedged); load following costs associated with balancing the actual load in the ISO real-time market; energy management service related fees; the ISO transmission charges and credits to load serving entities; the ISO ancillary services charges such as generation regulation, spinning reserve, and reactive power; and the ISO administrative charges and cost of service recovery fees. All In Cost of Service ("AICS") accounts for the net cost of wholesale power to the City of Dover Electric Utility. The AICS starts with the AIE and adds the costs or credits from capacity obligations, capacity credits for Dover-owned generation, generation revenues, generating plant costs, the black start ancillary services credit for the Van Sant plant, and revenues associated with the sale of emission allowances. Black Start is a generating ancillary service that is the process of restoring a generating plant to service without the support of an external power supply to power auxiliary equipment needed for start up operations. Capacity UCAP Obligated Purchased is the obligation and payment by all load serving entities in PJM including Dover for the Unforced Capacity (UCAP) requirement from PJM that satisfies the PJM reserve requirements. Generation Capacity Credit: is the credit provided to generators for supply capacity to the system. The price is determined by the PJM Reliability Pricing Market auction process that includes three auctions for each capacity year. Generation Production Margin accounts for the variable margin excluding variable O&M and emissions. The Generation Production Margin is calculated by taking the PJM revenues credited to the plant including any balancing charges or credits less the fuel costs. Generation Production Margin includes both “Economic and reliability dispatch” and “Testing.” Economic and reliability dispatch equals the margin achieved when Dover’s generating plants are dispatched by PJM for either economic dispatch (the system energy price is greater than the Dover bid price) or reliability dispatch whereby PJM pays the generating cost of the plants for the hours the plant is run to support the system. Generation Testing equals the Generation Production Margin associated with testing. This is usually expected to be a negative margin because the plant is potentially being dispatched / run when energy prices do not cover its costs. Non-Production Revenue equals the credits from PJM to Dover for Generation Capacity Credit, the Black Start Revenue and the sales by Dover of Emission Allowances. 44

Back to this meeting