This text was pulled from the PDF automatically and may contain mistakes. The PDF is the official record, so check it before relying on this.
Page 1
SAFETY ADVISORY AND
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
AGENDA
June 24, 2008 - 6:00 P.M. - Caucus Room - City Hall - City of Dover
Public comments are welcomed on any item and will be permitted at appropriate times.
When possible, please notify the City Clerk (736-7008 or e-m ail at Tm cdowell@dover.de.us)
should you wish to be recognized.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
1. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Review: Transportation Chapter
2. Briefing on MPO Projects (Juanita Wieczoreck)
/tm
S:\ClerksOffice\Agendas&Minutes\Committee-Agendas\DRAFTS\2008\06-24-2008 SA&T.wpd
THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO
INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.
Page 2
CHAPTER 9
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Part I - Background
The Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) was established in
1992 in response to the United States Inter-modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
of 1991 (ISTEA). The Act was reauthorized by the US Congress in 1998 as the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21). Building on these two
landmark bills, Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) was created in August 2005. The Dover/Kent County
MPO has updated its 2030 Long range Transportation Plan (LRTP) in May 2005.
As the City formulated the Dover Plan in 2003, the Dover/Kent MPO concurrently
developed its 2030 LRTP for Kent County. The transportation chapter from the 2003
plan was derived largely from that MPO plan. The City of Dover is a leading member of
the Dover/Kent County MPO and the City of Dover Planning Department was
represented on the LRTP steering committee. This 2008 Update is based on a
combination of the 2030 LRTP and SAFETEA-LU, both published in 2005. Where
appropriate, the results of Dover citizen participation workshops are included, in addition
to Dover-specific transportation goals and policies.
Patterns of Travel
Auto Travel
Over the past several decades, automobiles have increasingly dominated the way people
travel. Many factors have led to this increased dependence on automobiles including
development patterns, employment trends, population growth and demographics, and
income trends, specifically:
• Most workers continue to drive alone.
• Few workers choose to walk, bicycle or carpool.
• More people are riding transit, but not to work.
• The number of vehicles owned by each household is increasing with most
households owning at least two vehicles.
• The annual number of vehicle miles traveled increased at a greater rate than total
roadway mileage, vehicles, or drivers.
In short, more vehicles are being driven more miles while carrying fewer people.
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 1
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 3
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is a key measure of roadway use. Overall the statewide
VMT increased by 21.2 percent between 1999 and 2006. Chart 8-1 depicts the change in
VMT in Kent County.
Chart 9-1
Total Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled (in millions) in Kent County (1999-2006)
Source: Delaware Department of Transportation
Another indicator of vehicular travel is the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) on
roadways. The following table illustrates the AADT at DelDOT counting stations in Kent
County. Locations in Dover are highlighted. Road segments in or near Dover are shaded.
Table 9-1: AADT and Percent Change, 2002 – 2006
CHANGE CHANGE
ROAD LOCATION 2002 2004 2006
02-04 04-06
US 13 Dover Downs 45,731 49,091 56,662 7.35% 15.42%
RD 88 NE of Dover 1,622 1,531 1,600 -5.61% 4.51%
DE 8 W. Dover City Limit 12,019 12,005 11,697 -0.12% -2.57%
US 13 Court Street, Dover 25,881 23,596 24,945 -8.83% 5.72%
US 113 Court Street, Dover 25,408 24,876 22,751 -2.09% -8.54%
Source: Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), 2006 Traffic Summary
SR 1 remains the major thoroughfare through Dover and Kent County. Increases in
AADT can be linked to increased development such as that on DE Route 8 in Dover.
AADT on Rt. 13 near Dover Downs continues to be the highest and has increased
between 2002 and 2006.
Increases in traffic on Rt. 8, Rt. 113 and Rt. 13 and the resulting increased AADT on
Dover roads were discussed during citizen participation workshops. When asked if Rts. 8,
113, and 13 were adequate to handle daily traffic, the majority of responded stated that
they were not, and that respondents’ daily commute did take significately longer than 5
years ago. In 2003, when asked if US Routes 13/113 were adequate to handle daily
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 2
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 4
traffic present on the road respondents were split, with 44% disagreeing with this
statement. Clearly traffic and traffic congestion continues to be an issue for the public in
Dover.
The Dover Kent MPO’s 2030 LRTP expands on these detailed findings throughout the
City and Kent County at-large.
Truck Travel
The dominant means of transporting goods in Dover, as in all of Delaware and the United
States, is trucking. Trucks move about 80% of manufactured goods to and from
Delaware each year.
In Kent County, US Route 13, US Route 113, and SR 1 are major truck routes. In Dover,
McKee-Saulsbury Road is a designated truck route to serve the industrial areas on the
west side of Dover. Rt. 8/Scarborough Road connecting SR 1 with McKee/Saulsbury
Road has enhanced this truck connection to Dover in recent years. Development of the
industrial area in southeast Dover, Horsepond Road and Lafferty Lane also increased
truck traffic.
Despite the concentration of industrial uses and warehouse facilities in Dover and
surrounding areas of Kent County, there is no full service truck stop facility in the area.
This has led to an increasing problem of trucks parking overnight along road shoulders
and in shopping center parking lots.
Public Transit
Public transit in Kent County is provided to a service area covering approximately 27.45
square miles, centered around Dover. The public transit service area is defined as any
location within one-quarter mile on either side of a bus route. DART First State has
improved services in Dover and the surrounding area. DART now provides weekday
service from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. along routes in Dover and Kent County with an new Go
Link Night Service provides Dover residents with connections to fixed route transit
service within the City. The Water Street Transfer Center remains DART hub for this
operation, utilizing a timed-transfer system. A fleet of ten medium-sized buses provides
weekday service along thirteen local routes (Routes 100-109, 112, 113, 401) in Dover
and the surrounding areas. In 2004, this transit fleet logged 426,806 vehicle miles and
31,674 vehicle hours. Two Inter-County bus routes also connect all three counties to
Dover. Route 301 connects Wilmington to Dover on weekdays and Route 303 connects
Dover-Milford-Georgetown between Kent and Sussex Counties. During the summer
months, Dart operates Route 305 on weekends, connecting Wilmington and Dover with
Rehoboth Beach. A maintenance and repair facility is located at the Department of
Transportation complex in Dover.
Ridership has increased slowly but steadily since 2003 with over 300,000 passenger trips
annually in Kent County. Dart First State estimates that nearly half of these riders were
high school or university students. The remaining riders were largely transit dependent;
meaning, most public transit riders lack independent means of transportation. Primary
trip destinations included school, commuting, medical services and shopping. Table 8-3
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 3
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 5
provides operating statistics for DART First State South District from 1999 through
2004.
Table 9-2: Transit Operating Statistics, 1999-2004
Measure 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Miles 385,725 420,707 403,975 408,430 408,528 426,806
Hours 28,179 31,577 30,928 30,933 30,820 31,674
Passenger
Trips 311,964 311,855 301,623 308,716 303,914 308,759
Trips/Mile 0.81 0.74 0.75 0.76 0.74 0.72
Trips/Hour 11.07 9.88 9.75 9.98 9.86 9.75
Source: Delaware Transit Corporation
DART First State also provides the Paratransit door-to-door bus service in Dover for
individuals who are unable to use fixed route bus service due to age or disability.
Certification, as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act, is required to utilize the
Para-transit service. The service is also available to individuals in need of transportation
to and from renal care dialysis treatment. Reservations for this service must be made at
least one day in advance. Some private and public social service agencies also offer
transportation to the elderly and disabled.
In 2007, the DART First State supplemented the “Transitioning to Transit: Delaware’s
Long Range Transit Plan for the 21st Century” with the 2008-2013 Business Plan. This
6-year plan recognizes Kent County and, more appropriately, Dover’s, increased need for
public transit. In this plan, the DART First State realizes that it has to “tailor downstate
transit to the needs of distinct markets, such as Kent County.” The plan highlights a
number of “better service arrangements” that can be explored to improve public transit in
Kent County. Examples of these arrangements include evening and weekend services in
the Dover area, and shortening the times between buses.
DART has also added the “Get a Job, Get a Ride” program to provide employees
throughout the state with discounted/ free transit cards during the first month of
employment. Employers are required to register with DART in order to quality their
employees.
Even with the increase in transit ridership along DART routes, citizens have continued to
raise concerns about the inaccessibility and inconvenience of the Greyhound/Carolina
Trailways Lines intercity bus service. Eleven to twelve thousand passengers arrive and
depart from Dover’s Greyhound terminal annually. A large number of these riders are
going to and coming from the Dover Air Force Base; many others are students traveling
to and from colleges and family members visiting relatives. The scheduled arrivals and
departures in Dover mainly link to New York City in the north, through Wilmington and
Philadelphia; and through Salisbury, Maryland to Norfolk, Va., where connections can be
made for further travel into the South.
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 4
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 6
Noting that Greyhound/Carolina Trailways shares its terminal facilities with local transit
agencies in more than ninety cities, the DART First State service has explored the
possibility of co-locating its transit hub in Dover with Greyhound/Carolina Trailways. In
2004, the Dover/Kent MPO approached City Council with a request to build a new transit
Hub along Queen and Water Streets to serve as a multimodal transit center for the Dover
and surrounding Kent County area. The hub would serve as a bus, DART and taxi
service hub with the ability to integrate rail service in the future. The proposed fully
enclosed terminal facility would provide local transit users with shelter from inclement
weather and meet these critical local transit needs.
During the community planning workshops, the lack of public transit was often
mentioned and ranked as the fifth highest "need" in Dover out of a possible 20. Overall,
when discussing what citizens liked least about Dover, the lack of transit ranked 13th out
of 132 dislikes. When surveying people’s opinions about US Route 13, 46% of the
respondents felt that there need to be more bus shelters along local routes.
Pedestrian and Bikeways
A number of different types of facilities accommodate the use of bicycling and walking
as travel modes within the City. Bicycle facilities on separate rights-of-way include bike
paths, bike trails and greenways. Bicycle facilities within the roadway rights-of-way
include bike lanes, paved shoulders, wide curb lanes, shared roadways, and bike routes.
When surveyed during the 2008 public workshops, 68% of respondents stated there are
an insufficient number of sidewalks with the City. A higher number of respondents
stated that more bike and pedestrian walkways/paths need to be built. The previous
community planning workshops in 2003 supported more bikeways and sidewalks. When
discussing the needs and dislikes of living in Dover the need for sidewalks and bicycle
paths ranked 4th and 6th respectively out 20 problems listed. In addition walking/bicycle
trails ranked 3rd out of 10 possible choices by survey participants.
Bikeways and pedestrian ways along the collector and arterial streets are fragmented.
Some roadways are augmented with a cautionary “share the road” signs to increase
motorists’ awareness of the presence of bicycles. Today, several types of facilities
accommodate the use of bicycling and walking as a travel mode. All of these facility
types are represented in Dover, although the City still lacks a completely interconnected
bicycle and pedestrian transportation system. Dover requires that sidewalks be
constructed as a part of any new development or redevelopment application, and this
requirement has led to a great increase in sidewalks located throughout the City. The
challenge will be connecting those segments.
Since 2003, significant progress toward the sidewalk and bike path goals has been
achieved. Many of these projects have been completed in conjunction with other road
improvement projects, and as a part of development proposals involving particular
parcels. Notable improvements include a bike path and sidewalk along North Street from
Mifflin Road to West Street (part of which was constructed by private developers), new
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 5
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 7
sidewalks on US Route 13 between Loockerman Street and Division Street, phase II
completion of the St. Jones Greenway – Isaac Branch Trail, addition of sidewalks about
Rt. 13 from Court Street to Denny’s Road, and a proposed bicycle and pedestrian
underpass to connect the South Dover residential neighborhoods with Schutte Park.
Recent statistics reveal that the percentage of roads with sidewalks increased slightly in
the county. The City of Dover requires that multi-modal sidewalks be installed in all new
developments along frontage.
Rail Transportation
The Delmarva Secondary Line is the primary north-south rail connection along Delmarva
and is operated by Norfolk-Southern as a freight line. It roughly parallels the US Route
13 roadway corridor and bisects Dover. To the north, this line connects to the Northeast
Corridor serving many destinations in the northeastern United States.
Inter-modal transfer centers, switching yards, and similar facilities greatly increase the
feasibility of rail transport. In Dover, a switching yard services the Kraft Foods and
Procter and Gamble Paper plant on the west side of Dover. In this same area along New
Burton Road, Norfolk-Southern often stores and switches cars for its general operation.
The location of this switch/storage yard is problematic at best. Its present location not
only causes noise problems, but the storage and marshalling of chemical cars poses a
potential environmental and safety hazard to area residents. The leak of the chemical
styrene in 2006 originated from a rail car carrying styrene monomer caused a partial
evacuation of areas near Cheswold on the Reichhold Chemical property. The area is
adjacent to heavily populated residential neighborhoods. This leak raised the level of
awareness of residents and City government. It provided the impetus for hiring an
Emergency Management Coordinator and the updating and implementation of a Disaster
Relief Plan. It is a priority for the City to address the marshalling of railcars and the
substances that may or many not contain to protect the health, safety and welfare of its
residents.
Freight Rail
The future of rail travel in Delaware is bolstered by the commitment of Norfolk-Southern
Railroad to continuing in the region. In addition, the Commuter Rail Study recommended
that passenger rail eventually be extended to Dover. It is encouraging to note that recently
Norfolk-Southern has taken more of an interest in the flexible operating strategies
necessary to make small rail corridors, such as the one through Dover, profitable for the
carrier and accessible to a variety of industries. The viability of the rail service is
hindered by the lack of an operating inter-modal rail facility in Kent County. Corrado
American has ceased operation of their facility in Felton. Few comments related to
freight rail were received during the community planning workshops.
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 6
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 8
Passenger Rail
Passenger rail services is only offered in Kent County during special events such as
NASCAR races at Dover Downs and the State Fair in Harrington The future of rail travel
in Delaware has been discussed at length throughout the past 2 decades. In 2003,
DelDOT conducted a Commuter Rail Study under the Wilmington-Dover Rail Service
Task Force. The study was conducted to determine the feasibility of expanding passenger
rail service from Newark/Wilmington to Middletown and then expanding further to
Dover. Results of the study indicated that passenger rail service to the Dover area was not
feasible until 2025.
While the respondents to the workshop questionnaire did not comment on a desire for rail
service in Dover, on a scales from 1-10, the majority of respondents liked the proximity
of Dover to other large cities (61%).
Aviation
The primary aviation facility in Kent County is Dover Air Force Base (DAFB), which
permits limited public service at an adjacent civil air terminal, the Central Delaware
Commuter Air Facility. In addition to the facilities at the DAFB, five of Kent County’s
other public use aviation facilities provide general aviation services. Another, the
DelDOT Helistop is a publicly owned helicopter-landing pad, located at the DelDOT
complex in Dover, and available for public use. An ancillary facility, the Kent County
Aero Park is a 115-acre county-owned industrial/business park located next to the Air
Force Base. Several of the twenty-three lots in the park are reserved for aircraft related
industries.
Within the next 15 to 20 years, the county’s facilities will be inadequate. To meet future
needs and provide public aviation facilities in Kent County, the State has acquired the
Delaware Airpark in Cheswold. This facility is located less than five miles away from
Dover, and is important to future economic development efforts. Some improvements
are planned to the airpark, including runway enhancements intended to accommodate
larger aircraft. The Delaware River and Bay Authority (DRBA) is currently operating
both the Delaware Airpark and the Central Delaware Commuter Air Facility.
The City is also currently collaborating to conduct an Aviation Study to explore the
feasibility of launching commuter commercial airline service(s) at the Civil Air Terminal
(CAT) at Dover Air Force Base. The purpose of the study is the see if there is enough
demand to attract commercial airlines to the CAT and explore funding options/
opportunities in the future.
Roadway Systems
Like Maryland and Virginia, the State of Delaware, through the Delaware Department of
Transportation, owns and maintains the vast majority of the roadways. Virtually all
arterial and collector roads are managed by the State. The City of Dover owns and
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 7
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 9
maintains only the local street system in the City. The partnership between the City, the
Dover/Kent County MPO, and DelDOT is critically important to coordinating land use
and transportation planning in Dover.
The City’s roadways range in character from four-lane highways to local streets. The
functional classification system classifies roadways based on the degree to which they
limit access. The functional classes are listed below and are based on the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) Functional Classification guidelines. The City’s
classifications systems differ slightly from that of DelDOT. These classifications need to
be aligned with DelDOT in order to alleviate confusion and streamline projects.
Urban Principal Arterial System
In every urban environment, there exists a system of streets and highways that can be
identified as unusually significant to the area in which it lies in terms of the nature and
composition of travel it serves. This system is not restricted to controlled access routes.
In order to preserve the identification of controlled access facilities, the principal arterial
system is stratified as follows: (1) Interstate, (2) other freeways and expressways, and (3)
other principal arterials (with no control of access). For principal arterials, the concept of
service to abutting land should be subordinate to the provision of travel service to major
traffic movements.
Dover’s principal arterials are State Route 1, US Route 13 and US Route 113.
Urban Minor Arterial Street System
The minor arterial street system includes all arterials not classified as a principal and
contains facilities that place more emphasis on land access than the higher system, and
offer a lower level of traffic mobility. Such facilities may carry local bus routes and
provide intra-community continuity, but ideally should not penetrate identifiable
neighborhoods.
The minor arteries in Dover include: State Street, Governors Avenue, McKee / Saulsbury
Road, Walker Road, College Road, Forrest Avenue, and N. Little Creek Road.
Urban Collector Street System
The collector street system provides land access service and traffic circulation within
residential neighborhoods, commercial and industrial areas. Collector streets may
penetrate residential neighborhoods, distributing trips from the arterials through the area
to the ultimate destination. The collector street also collects traffic from local streets in
residential neighborhoods and channels it into the arterial system.
Urban Local Street System
The local street system comprises all facilities not on one of the higher systems. It serves
primarily to provide direct access to abutting land and access to the higher order systems.
It offers the lowest level of mobility and usually contains no bus routes.
City Streets
The City owns and maintains approximately 100 miles of roadway within the City limits.
As developments have moved forward to completion and infrastructure has been
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 8
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 10
dedicated to the City, this mileage has grown over time. Table 9-3 [include table] shows
the increase in City street mileage between 2005 and 2008. As developments continue to
move forward to completion and infrastructure dedication, the street mileage will
continue to increase over time. The City has an active program to maintain City streets
and to repave streets as they deteriorate over time. The City’s Street Program is funded
through the City’s general fund budget, as well as through legislator commitments of
Community Transportation Fund dollars. The City also sweeps City streets on a weekly
basis.
Table 9-3 Certified Street Mileage: City of Dover, 2005 – 2007
2005 2006 2007 2008
100.26 miles
93.61 miles 94.10 miles 96.27 miles (anticipated)
This represents a 2.84% increase in total mileage over past 3 years. In addition, the City
estimates that approximately 8-10 miles of streets are under construction with in new
subdivision that have not been dedicated to public maintenance as 2007
Roadway Capacity and Performance
The need for road improvements were identified in the community workshops in March
and June 2008. Just over 50% of respondents stated that Routes 13 and 113 were not
adequate to handle daily traffic present on the road while 61% responded that Rt. 8 is not
adequate to handle its daily traffic. In addition, participants were asked if their overall
commute was longer in 008 than in the previous 5 years. The majority (60%) stated in
the affirmative, that their commute today takes more time than 5 years ago. Additionally,
participants were asked to rate if the appearance of the Rt. 13 corridor has improved in
recent years. Nearly 59% stated that the corridor has not improved in appearance and
many commented that the increase of strip malls along Rt. 13 has increased traffic
overall.
Air Quality: The Ozone Challenge
According to the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA of 1990), the Kent County
portion of the Dover/Kent County MPO planning area is designated as a moderate non-
attainment area for ozone under the 8-hour standard. The air quality analysis conducted
for the 2005 Dover/Kent County MPO transportation plan update identified emissions
impacts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) - the two
compound precursors of ground level ozone formation. Both Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOC) - or hydrocarbons - and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) are the result of
imperfect combustion within a vehicle’s engine. When combined with sunlight, they
form ground-level ozone, the major component of smog that can damage lung tissue,
aggravate respiratory disease and make people more susceptible to respiratory infections.
Automobile emissions are one of the major contributors to ozone formation.
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 9
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 11
The previous sections of the plan that detail the increase in vehicle usage and roadway
congestion demonstrates that there are some significant challenges that will have to be
overcome to improve our air quality in Dover. The cultural and societal trends that have
led to increased use of our roadways will not be easy to counter, at least in the short term.
The Dover Plan is committed to meeting the “ozone challenge” through a variety of
strategies which seek to provide alternative transportation options to residents, and to
ensure that Dover’s built environment provides opportunities for those residents to take
advantage of those alternatives. The following is a summary of some of the strategies
employed by this plan:
• The Land Development Plan encourages mixed-use development in Downtown
Dover, and provides for various well integrated residential and employment
centers throughout the City. See Chapter 12 for more information.
• Opportunities for increased use of public transportation are supported.
• Numerous bicycle and pedestrian improvements are being suggested by the MPO
and the City, and a major strategy of this plan is to encourage interconnections to
provide a continuous bicycle and pedestrian transportation system.
• This plan contains an economic development chapter which seeks to attract
business and industry to Dover. More employment opportunities may lead to
more people living and working in the same community. Employees who live
and work in Dover may find commuting by transit, bicycle or as pedestrians to be
viable options. See Chapter 10 for more information.
• The City is in full support of the MPO’s efforts to decrease ozone pollution, and
to educate the public regarding “the Ozone Challenge.”
Assessing Future Transportation Needs
To determine future transportation needs, the MPO not only scrutinized the trends
described, but used those trends to develop travel demand forecasts that would indicate
the highways on which congestion could be expected by 2030. Once those highways
were identified, strategies and actions could be examined and analyzed for their value to
mitigate expected deficiencies.
Dover Transit Hub (DTH)
The Dover Transit hub has outgrown the existing Water Street Transfer Hub in Dover
and the State’s Division of Facilities Management has stated the site is needed to
“support the court system expansion in Downtown Dover.” DelDOT has purchased the
former George & Lynch property at Water and Queen Streets to support the new transit
hub. The site has been cleared and Phase I & II environmental studies have been
completed. Conceptual plans were completed in 2008 and the City is currently meeting
with DelDOT, MPO members and design engineers to study the funding possibilities and
feasibility of the DTH. The site is designed to include an indoor waiting area, ticket
sales, restrooms, and service DART local, para-transit and intercounty lines as well as
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 10
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 12
commercial bus service and taxis. It has also been identified as an ideal location for
future growth for downstate commuter rail.
Travel Demand Analysis
To develop travel demand forecasts that would identify transportation system
deficiencies, it was necessary to generate traffic volumes to represent:
• Existing conditions
• Future conditions with no change in the roadway network (2030 no-build)
• Future conditions with changes (2030 build)
These traffic volumes were calculated and assigned to the roadway network by means of
DelDOT’s transportation plan computer model of Kent and Sussex Counties. The model
uses a three-step process to model travel. Demographic data is used to determine how
many trips are generated by each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ), and the TAZ to which
each trip is destined. Trips are assigned to paths along the highway network based on
minimal path travel times, forming link volumes.
Over the last five years, the MPO member governments have recognized the impact of
sprawl, which necessitates travel by private automobile, on the region’s mobility.
Consequently, new policies encourage growth in areas close to existing infrastructure by
means of a facilitated development process and public funding.
The changes in these policies were reflected in the travel demand analysis through the
redistribution of population to the TAZs. Representatives of the DelDOT, county, and
City planning offices met and worked together to reallocate population among the TAZs
in the model. The redistributed population, along with the existing transportation system,
comprised the “base case” scenario for each run of the model. The travel demand model
was run with this scenario to indicate where current congestion problems exist.
The analysis identified over 20 roadways with segments that would be deficient if current
trends in population, employment and trip making continued and the roadway network
was not improved. This was labeled the 2030 “no-build” scenario. The segments
projected to be deficient by 2030 are indicated below in Table 9-4 and shown in the map
appendix.
Table 9-4: 2030 “No Build” Deficient Roadway Segments
Roadway Segment
US Route 13 Crawford Carroll Avenue to College Road
College Road to N. State Street
N. State Street to Townsend Boulevard
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 11
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 13
Roadway Segment
Loockerman Street to Route 13/113 split
Puncheon Run Connector to Governors
Avenue
Governors Avenue to Meadow Glen
SR 1 Old Lebanon Road to South State Street
Scarborough Road Crawford Carroll Avenue
Alt US 113 State Street Roosevelt Avenue to Route 3
DE 8 Saulsbury Road to Loockerman Street
Loockerman Street to West Street
N. State Street to Kings Highway
Kings Highway to Park Drive
Kings Highway to Route 13
Route 13 to Halsey Road
Saulsbury Road Walker Road to Clara Street
Route 8 to Hazlettville Road
US 13 Alt Governors Ave. Walker Road to Mary Street
Loockerman Street Route 8 to Bradford Street
Federal Street to Park Drive
Kenton Road Walker Road to Fieldstone Court
Foxhall Drive to Route 8
Walker Road N. State Street to Dover High School
K73 Hazlettville Road Hazlettville Road at Eden Hill
Kings Highway Route 8 to Route 13
N. State Street Route 13 to Walker Road
Mary Street to Route 8
Wyoming Mill Road New Burton Road to Camden/Wyoming
Avenue
Source: Dover / Kent County MPO LRTP 2030
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 12
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 14
Part II: Transportation Accomplishments Since 2003
Since 2003 there have been a number of significant transportation improvements in
Dover that have served to implement the Comprehensive Plan, as well as a number of
studies which have been completed that have furthered the goals of the plan. These
accomplishments are summarized below.
Recent Road System Improvements
[Currently being updated with Public Services]
In an effort to increase capacity in and around Dover, the following improvements have
been accomplished since 2003:
• Partial interchange at SR 1 and DE Route 8 for use by the general public.
• Widening of White Oak Road, from US Route 13 to SR 1.
• Implementation of Intelligent Transportation Systems, particularly improvements
to lights on Route 8, and US Route 13.
• A New Public Transit Transfer Center in Downtown Dover.
• The creation of service roads to serve US Route 13 establishments through rear
access.
• Construction of the Mifflin Road roundabout.
• Improvements to the North Street corridor from West Street to Mifflin Road.
• Intersection improvements on North Street, West Street, Saulsbury Road, and
Mifflin Road.
Signalization
As noted previously, citizens have been concerned about the functioning of the traffic
lights in the Dover area. Their concerns are about the traffic flow and the congestion at
certain intersections. They generally express their concerns by questioning the
sequencing and timing of the lights.
The State Department of Transportation developed an “Integrated Transportation
Management System,” commonly referred to as “DelTRAC.” This system uses a
multimodal approach to improving the movement of people and goods by using modern
technology and a Transportation Management Center (TMC) to monitor travel and adjust
signals, signage and public transit to lessen congestion.
In 2008, the City completed Phase II of the Signalization Project incorporating 18
signalized intersections in Dover into the DelTrac system. As a result, DelDOT is now
responsible for the monitoring and adjusting of current conditions and signals
automatically adjusting these traffic signals, freeway access, lane use and traffic
schedules in response to real-time demand in the Dover area.
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 13
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 15
Along with the assumption of ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all 18
intersections, the project included the replacement of each signal with ornamental mast
arms and pedestrian poles. In addition, pedestrian facilities (curb ramps, crosswalks and
pedestrian signals) were upgraded to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) requirements.
Dover Bikeways & Pedestrian Transportation Plan
The City of Dover contracted with an engineering, architecture, and planning consulting
firm, “The RBA Group.” This firm prepared the “Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation
Plan.” The report was completed in June 1997. This was the result of a year-long
planning process that responded to the growing need for the integration of transportation
alternatives in Dover. While this report is 11 years old, it is still relevant in regards to the
need for multi-modal streets and sidewalks. Many participants in the workshops,
however, voiced the need for updating this report to make it more relevant to Dover’s
growing communities.
Recommendations consisted of system-wide solutions for the entire City, on-road bicycle
and pedestrian improvements for the roadways within the study network, and
independent project recommendations. Comprehensive engineering design treatments
were not part of this plan, however, an assessment of some preliminary, route specific
improvement recommendations were made to identify target facility types for selected
routes. The study lists the top ten individual projects identified by the citizens of Dover.
This list includes the following: Schutte Park off-road connection; enhanced pedestrian
crossing – New Burton Road; a multi-purpose path between Delaware State University
and Delaware Technical & Community College; and Walker Road bicycle and pedestrian
facility improvements.
West Dover Connector Study
With the completion of SR 1 around Dover, east-west corridors in and out of the City
have increased in traffic. The City of Dover Comprehensive Plan and the Dover/Kent
MPO Long Range Transportation Plan recommended studying the extension of Saulsbury
Road due to persistent and fast-paced growth that contributes to existing and future traffic
congestion on existing roadways and through local neighborhoods. The West Dover
Connector project will study the feasibility of extending Saulsbury Road across what is
currently the Eden Hill Farm and adjacent agricultural parcels making connections to
New Burton Road and possibly to US 13. Because much of the land needed for such a
roadway is undeveloped, the opportunity still exists to make improvements that best
accommodate the area's multi-modal transportation needs. Alternative routes and
concepts are being developed with the input and guidance of the West Dover Connector
Working Group that began in 2004. This group is working in conjunction with DelDOT
and with neighborhood and community officials, schools, local government leaders,
concerned citizens, federal and state environmental and cultural resource agencies, and
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 14
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 16
others to develop options that meet the diverse needs of the community. Option #5C was
accepted by the City Council in December 2006.
The purpose of the West Dover Connector Working Group is to provide advice to
DelDOT regarding the West Dover Connector. The role of the Group is to assist DelDOT
by providing input, making suggestions, reviewing alternatives, narrowing the range of
alternatives, recommending alternatives that will receive detailed study, and
recommending preferred alternatives. The Group will help in developing a consensus and
gaining public comment and acceptance.
US Route 13/113 Corridor Study [Currently being updated with Public Services]
The purpose of the US Route 13 / 113 corridor through the City has changed. This
roadway once served the dual purposes of a high speed through travel route and as a local
access road to service the many commercial businesses that were constructed along it.
With SR 1 serving the needs of through travelers, US Route 13/113 is becoming a
destination for commerce and community activities, as well as a significant employment
center for the growing service sector. In order to address the changing character of this
roadway a workshop was conducted by the Dover/Kent County MPO. The purpose of
the workshop was to generate new ideas for improving the appearance and operation of
the corridor. The organization prepared a report entitled “Concept Plan for US Routes 13
and 113 in Dover – Phase I, Technical Memorandum II: Final Recommendations.” This
was adopted by the MPO in November 1, 2000.
The final recommendations of the study were:
• Create a corridor overlay zone;
• Service roads for local traffic;
• Assist voluntary development of rear access to business;
• Construction of sidewalks and bike paths;
• Median landscaping;
• Add bus pullovers where needed;
• Installation of attractive lights that serve both motorists and pedestrians;
• Bury utilities;
• Install pedestrian buttons at signals and strip crosswalks heavily;
• And develop a system of appropriate signage.
Phase II has been completed. Projects have been submitted and are working their way
through the project development process.
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 15
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 17
Part III –Goals and Recommendations
Goal 1: Preserve and Maintain the Existing System with Improved Management
Encroaching development and unlimited access onto the region’s major roadways
reduces system capacity. By guiding development, controlling access, and taking active
steps to preserve transportation system investments that have already been made, the
existing system can be maintained to a large degree.
Recommendation 1:
Increase the Capacity of the Transportation System through:
• Improving corridor intersections
• Upgrading facilities
• Concentrating on commercial corridors
• Increasing transit service efficiency
• Increasing park and ride usage
• Supporting travel demand management strategies
• Expanding DART First State Transit Service and routes
• Expanding Paratransit
• Expanding rail freight service
• Facilitating rail system access
• Supporting opportunities to expand aviation facilities
• Facilitating and expanding access to public/private airports in the region’s
transportation system
• Improving provisions for non-motorized travel
• Supporting the return of passenger rail service
• Finding new locations for highway/rail/air freight transfer facilities; re-location of
Norfolk-Southern switching yard on New Burton Road
• Increasing options for dependable commercial air freight and passenger service
through the Dover Air Force Base
• Establishing commercial large aircraft maintenance facility at the Civil Air
Terminal
Other Actions to increase capacity are:
• Transforming Route 8 and US Route 13 into “commercial boulevards” with
enhanced landscaping, improved transit stops and shelters, better pedestrian paths,
and sign control.
• Implementing recommendations from the Route 8 study and the Route 13/113
Study
• Constructing Park and Ride Lots.
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 16
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 18
Goal 2: Increase Coordination with Agencies
Work with citizens, DelDOT, and the MPO to develop sub-area plans for the areas
designated as Transportation Improvement Districts.
Recommendation 2:
Leadership in the MPO
• Continue to play an active role in the Dover/Kent County MPO
• Continue to use the MPO as a forum for long-range transportation planning and
interacting with DelDOT.
Recommendation 3:
Streamline Project Submissions to DelDOT
Rather than piecemeal submissions of road improvement, restoration, streetscape, new
road construction, subject such projects as a package to make the process more efficient
and cost-effective.
Goal 3: Develop and Expand Alternate Modes of Transportation
Expanding facilities and services for alternate modes of transportation such as walking,
bicycling, taxi, and transit services enhances mobility for residents, reduces the number
of single-occupant vehicles, and reduces the need to own an automobile.
Recommendation 4:
Update and Implement the Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan to Improve
the Bike-Pedestrian Network
• Review the bicycle and pedestrian transportation network to identify gaps and
important segments needed to provide a continuous network.
• Develop an implementation plan to complete this network. The construction of
the missing sidewalk / bikepath segments can be accomplished utilizing a
combination of private development activities, City funding through the CIP, and
funding available through DelDOT and SAFETEA-LU.
Goal 4: Create Recommendations and Policies for Roadways and Development:
The City should cooperate with DelDOT through the Development Advisory Committee
(DAC) and the Dover/Kent County MPO the following:
• Support for access management along minor arterials and collector roads to
protect traffic capacity and preserve the character of existing neighborhoods.
• Support for pedestrian, bikeways, and public transit in subdivisions and site plan
applications.
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 17
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 19
Recommendation 5:
Implement the US Route 13/113 Corridor Improvements
• Consider the implementation of the recommendations of the US 13 / 113 Corridor
Study, which would most likely involve developing an overlay zone to implement
the study’s many design recommendations.
Recommendation 6:
West Dover Connector
• The City should work with DelDOT, the MPO, private property owners,
neighborhood and school organizations on the plans for the West Dover
Connector.
• Continue to participate in the West Dover Study Working Group and Alignment
Option 5.c. as designated by City Council
Recommendation 7:
Determine the Feasibility of Including an East/West Route in the Corridor Capacity
Preservation Program
Currently, there are no east/west roads in Dover and Kent County at-large, that are
subject to the Corridor Capacity Preservation Program (CCPP). With the pace of
development, it is important to plan ahead to protect the capacity of the highway
program. On September 29, 2005, the Mayor sent a letter to DelDOT requesting that
several east/west roads be studied for inclusion in the CCPP.
It is important for the current and future residents of Dover that east/west road(s) be
identified and included in the CCPP. Within the City and extending into Kent County,
these roads would include Route 8 and Hazletteville Road.
Recommendation 8:
Determine Costs necessary to Build Access Road via SR 1 to the Garrison Oaks
Tract
Recommendation 9:
Miscellaneous Transportation Improvements
• Advocate the following projects and studies to be placed in the MPO
Transportation Improvement Program and the DelDOT Capital Transportation
Program (CTP): The Transportation & Safety Advisory Committee of City
Council has prioritized these projects.
Prioritization of City Transportation Projects
Intermodal Transportation Terminal (Bus Station)
West Dover Connector
West Street Traffic Flow
Kenton Road Corridor Upgrades
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 18
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 20
Loockerman Street / Forrest Avenue Improvements
College Road Corridor Upgrades
U.S. Route 13 Sidewalk Construction
Garrison Tract Connector Road
Crawford Carroll Avenue Extension
U.S. Route 13 Service Road Corridor Study
East/West Route Corridor Study
Policy/Program Prioritization List
Weekend Bus Service
Air Passenger Travel
Red Light Photo Enforcement Program
Bike Path Connectivity
Goal 5: Air Quality: The Ozone Challenge
The City of Dover is committed to working with the Dover/Kent County MPO to reduce
the air quality impact of auto emissions through sound land use planning, enhancing the
bicycle and pedestrian transportation network in Dover, and encouraging increased use of
public transit.
Recommendation 10:
Continue to adhere to the Clean Air Act of 1990
• Update and implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan of 1997 to
reduce vehicle emissions
• Encourage and support the instillation of multimodal paths alongside street
frontages where appropriate.
• Improve and widen sidewalks for bicycle and pedestrian use
• Encourage DelDOT to increase bicycle paths along major routes within the City
Transportation Principle
It appears that the City, the State, and the MPO will have to employ increasingly creative
solutions to traffic congestion in Dover over the course of the 25-year planning horizon
reviewed by the MPO. Dover’s roadway network may be reaching the point where
traditional engineering-based roadway improvements may provide diminishing returns.
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 19
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008
Page 21
The City will strive to employ transportation alternatives to improve the quality and
efficiency of the transportation network as new challenges emerge in the coming
decades.
2008 Comprehensive Plan Page 20
Chapter 9 – DRAFT June 20, 2008