This text was pulled from the PDF automatically and may contain mistakes. The PDF is the official record, so check it before relying on this.
3 pages have little or no readable text here, often scans or drawings. See the PDF for those.
Page 1
SPECIAL LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND
ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
AGENDA
May 7, 2007 - 6:00 P.M. - Council Chambers - City Hall - City of Dover
Public comments are welcomed on any item and will be permitted at appropriate times.
When possible, please notify the City Clerk (736-7008 or e-mail at
Tmcdowell@dover.de.us) should you wish to be recognized.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
1. Review of Audit Proposals and Selection of Firm
2. Adjournment
/tm
S:\ClerksOffice\Agendas&M inutes\Committee-Agendas\2007\05-07-2007 Special LF&A.wpd
THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO
INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.
Page 2
City of Dover
Finance Department
PO Box 475 |
Dover DE 19903-0475
Phone: (302-736-7018 ;
FAX: (302) 736-7177
E-Mail: dmitchell @dover.de.us
MEMORANDUM
To: Legislative, Finance & Administration Committee
From: Donna Mitchell, Treasurer/Finance Director
Copy: Tracey Lisiecki & City Clerk
Date: May 3, 2007
Subject: LF&A Meeting-May 8, 2007 Agenda Item 1
Please bring your copies of the technical proposals for audit services from the two Certified
Public Accounting firms and your scoring sheet to the May 8, 2007 meeting. These items were
sent to you on April 18, 2007. We will be discussing everyone’s comments and scores and after
the technical scores have been calculated we will review the sealed price proposals.
Page 3
LF&A Mtg 4/23/07
City of Dover
Finance Department
PO Box 475 /
Dover DE 19903-0475 \
Phone: (302-736-7018
FAX: (302) 736-7177
E-Mail: dmitchell @dover.de.us
MEMORANDUM
To: Legislative, Finance & Administration Committee
From: Donna Mitchell, Treasurer/Finance Director
Copy: Tracey Lisiecki & City Clerk
Date: April 18, 2007
Subject: Audit Proposals
Enclosed are copies of the technical proposals for audit services we received from two Certified
Public Accounting firms. A scoring sheet has been included for your review. We will be
scheduling a meeting with the Legislative, Finance, & Administrative Committee sometime the
first week of May to discuss everyone’s comments and scores. After the technical scores have
been calculated we will review the sealed price proposals.
Other enclosures —
Request for Proposal
Scoring Sheets
Calendar
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES EVALUATION CRITERIA
Proposals will be evaluated using three sets of criteria. Firms meeting the mandatory criteria will
have their proposals evaluated and scored for both technical qualifications and price. The
following represent the principal selection criteria, which will be considered during the evaluation
process.
1. Mandatory Elements
a. The audit firm is independent and licensed to practice in the State of
Delaware
b. The firm has no conflict of interest with regard to any other work performed
by the firm for the City of Dover
Cc. The firm adheres to the instructions in this request for proposal on preparing
and submitting the proposal
d. The firm submits a copy of its last external quality control review report and
the firm has a record of quality audit work.
e. The firm’s professional personnel have received adequate continuing
professional education within the preceding two (2) years.
2. Technical Quality: (Maximum Points - 70)
a. Expertise and Experience
(1) The firm's past experience and performance on comparable
government engagements
(2) The quality of the firm's professional personnel to be assigned to the
engagement and the quality of the firm's management support
personnel to be available for technical consultation
b. Audit Approach
(1) Adequacy of proposed staffing plan for various segments of the
engagement
(2) Adequacy of sampling techniques
(3) Adequacy of analytical procedures
3. Price: (Maximum Points - 30)
COST WILL NOT BE THE PRIMARY FACTOR IN THE SELECTION OF AN
AUDIT FIRM
1 of 2
Page 5
PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES EVALUATION 2007
EXHIBIT C
FIRMS
Clifton Gunderson
LLP
Faw Casson & Co
EVALUATORS: 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
WEIGHT
EVALUATIONCRITERIA FACTOR
it. MANDATORYELEMENTS (mark with x)
a. |The audit firmis independent and licensed to practice in Delaware. xX
The firm has no conflict of interest with regard to any other work performed by the
b. firm for State or Kent County Xx
The firm's professional personnel have received adequate continuing professional
c._|education within the preceding two (2) years. x
The firm submits a copy of its last external quality control review report and the
d.__|firm has a record of quality audit work. x
The firm adheres to the instructions in this request for proposal on preparing and
e. submitting the proposal. x
2. a. TECHNICALQUALITY-EXPERTIS= AND EXPERIENCE
‘The firm's past experience and performance on comparable government of
(1)_\engagement. 20
he quality of the firm's professional personnel to be assigned to the engagement
and the quality of the firm's management support personnel to be available for
(2) technical consultant. 20
b. AUDIT APPROACH
(1) \Adequacy of proposal staffing plan for various segments of the engagement. 10
(2) [Adequacy of sampling techniques. 10
(3) Adequacy of analytical procedures. 10
TOTAL
70
00 0 0 0
Page 6
2007 Audit Calendar
City of Dover
APRIL MAY JUNE
s ] w 7 > Js ls] o- w 7 s[s] ™ w T * |e
Tam
ae 0 6 5 7 3
Contract Interim Work
2 | a B 2 2 a» [alo] a 22 ogres stan] 24 a | | ® ° » 2 Piteimuo| oy
en
@ a | = = 2 a 2 = @ 2 =| ©
JULY AUGUST ‘SEPTEMBER,
s | w 7 > [sls] o™ w 7 s[s] ™ w + * [es
1 2 3 5 ° ‘2 3 4 1
Daal An
s | o Pan 1" 2 ws fuls |e 7 ® ° wo fufe] s 4 5 6 > |e
submited
« | 7 8 ° ~ [a fel] 1 6 18 7 «lof © 1 2 5 « fs
2 |e 2 2 7 7 [=|ol] @ a we 8 a |=|«|@ ° ° 20 a | 2
Tear
» | @ st 2 | a * 2» so | convo ala 2 2 a 2 | =
competes
Til Blancos & Sippot Soules Conpted #31 @
OCTOBER NOVEMBER, DECEMBER
s | w 7 es w 7 ee en w + Ts
1 2 3 a 5 ° 3 Mectge wih Audiors froqusted wih LFA 1
> |g [Baton
8 ° 101 0 2 | ines! 7 8 os Jule | a 5 ° 7 A
: ‘8 ‘8 ” ® w fo] | wz [omens] a6 6 «© |vl|e] 1 2 8 wu fos
‘auator
Daft
schon & , Fal : «lo , » [orm] . |
2) Neratemertsto * % a 2 | 18 | changes | al 2 ® y 5 5 enter a
‘Audion
Frat CaFRie
» | Ps a Pa 7 2 5
carn-ira| 2 2 2 2 cron | * |
Dra CAFR compte by Octobe 81 (rus Notes & SatstbalSecion) rip CRASS OS ODE a
Holidays - Green
Key Dates in RFP - Yellow
Page 7
CITY OF DOVER
Dover, Delaware
Jobinteemieiee
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES
Janis C. Nesterak, CPA
Faw, Casson & Co., LLP
160 Greentree Drive, Suite 203
Dover, Delaware 19904
Phone Number — 302-674-4305
Fax Number = 302-674-0910
E-Mail — jon@faweasson.com
April 13, 2007
Page 8
. CONTENTS
JE EIO EIU ISIS TIS SII SE
Letter Of Transmittal
Firm Profile
Requested Information
Peer Review Report
Personnel
Recent Audit Work
Audit Approach
Proposer Warranties
ARES HS IIIT III
EXHIBIT
mo oO @
fo}
Page 9
. A
OFFICES CFe MEMBERS.
SALISBURY, MD aW, AMERICAN INSTITUTE
DOVER, DE { OF CERTIFIED
OGEAN CITY, MD O O. L L P PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ley AGN INTERNATIONAL,
CERTIF‘ED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS BUSINESS CONSULTANTS
MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE AND
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
CITY OF DOVER
15 East Loockerman Street
Dover, Delaware 19901
Gentlemen:
Faw, Casson & Co., LLP is pleased to respond to the Request for Proposat for
Professional Auditing Services for the City of Dover.
We propose to provide the services as detailed in the Request for Proposal dated
March 14, 2007 and as discussed in this proposal. We understand the calendar as described in
the Request for Proposal and commit ourselves to meeting that timeline.
If selected. to be the City’s auditors, Janis C. Nesterak will continue to serve as
audit partner. Mrs. Nesterak's area of expertise is in governmental auditing and. financial
reporting. She is the only CPA in Delaware to serve as a judge for the Certificate for Excellence
in Financial Reporting Program sponsored by the Government Finance Officers Association.
Thus, she brings to the City her experience not only with other governmental units in this area,
but also from other units around the Country. Mrs. Nesterak’s experience with the financial
statements of many entities, combined with her knowledge of and experience.with the finances of
the City, make her most qualified to assist the City as it grows and becomes more complex.
In addition to irs. Nesterak’s expertise described above, Faw, Casson & Co.,
LLP, the largest firm in Dover and on the Delmarva Peninsula, through its own talent and its
membership in the AGN International — North America, Inc., is able to provide you with
experience and technical expertise beyond what could be developed in a smailer firm. Yet, as a
Dover firm, we are available on short notice to help you with projects and problems in areas such
as tax advice and compliance, budgeting, grants management and compliance, management
consulting, and to offer flexibility in scheduling so as to provide the most efficient and convenient
audit service fo the City.
This proposal is a firm and irrevocable offer for ninety days.
We would appreciate the opportunity to continue to be of service to the City.
Sincerely,
Jennings P. Hastings
Managing Partner
Page 10
FIRM PROFILE
Faw, Casson & Co,, LLP, founded in 1944, is in the practice of public accounting,
serving clients in various states. The Firm has grown with the area it serves and is presently the
largest firm on the Delmarva Peninsula and one of the largest firms in Delaware and Maryland,
with offices located in Dover, Delaware and Salisbury and Ocean City, Maryland.
The Firm is proud of the reputation it has achieved through the years for high
quality work, Every effort is made to maintain the quality of our professional services. Services
to our clients are rendered in the areas of auditing, accounting, taxation, management consulting,
computer consulting and data processing.
The partners and staff of Faw, Casson & Co., LLP have the primary responsibility
to furnish our clients with the best professional service. Because of our size, we are able to
maintain areas of expertise within the Firm and at the same time provide personal attention and
service to our clients.
The Firm has undergone an extensive peer review every three years since 1978.
In each review, the Firm has received an unqualified report and no-letter of comments,
Faw, Casson & Co., LLP continually strives to provide services to our profession
and to participate meaningfully in local community affairs. Much time and effort is spent in
support of our local, state and national professional organizations. Further, many of our partners
devote time to providing leadership in community organizations.
Our Firm is also a Charter Member of the AGN International ~ North America,
Inc. which consists of approximately fifty Jarger firms throughout the United States. The
Association Is equal in size to the twelfth largest accounting firm in the world. By belonging to the
Association, we are able to pool our resources to better serve our clients.
We are constantly striving to achieve our goal to be a positive contributing force:
within the accounting profession and te maintain a prestigious firm in the states or jurisdictions in
which we practice.
The continued success of our Firm is assured through our dedication to quality
work, technical competence and service to our profession and community.
Page 11
REQUESTED INFORMATION
Faw, Casson & Co., LLP is a properly licensed certified public accounting firm
and is independent of the City of Dover as defined by generally accepted auditing standards and
apport
ting and auditing practice of Faw,
‘the year ended May 31, 2004.
the year ended May 31, 2004. A
i structure and the policies
te assurance of complying with
scribed in the Statements on
Certified Public Accountants (the
¢ the responsibilities of the firm,
- system, and the firm’s
ished by the Peer Review
included procedures to plan and
stion of the peer review process.
te system of quality control or all
slective tests. Because there are
-y control, departures from the
revaluation of a system of quality
f quality control may become
> of compliance with the policies
sand auditing practice applicable
or the year ended May 31, 2004,
rol standards for an accounting
slied with during the year then
ring with applicable professional
the Government Accountability Office's Government Auditina Standards _.Kay. nrafaccinn
nal stat. :
SEPT SPELT ER KNOW LECIBE aiRE S
To The Partners of
Faw, Casson & Co., LLP
And the Center for Public Company Audit Firms
Peer Review Committee
We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accour
Casson & Co., LLP applicable to non-SEC issuers in effect for
The firm has informed us that it did not audit SEC-issuers for 1
system of quality control encompasses the firm’s organization:
adopted and procedutes established to provide it with reasonat
professional standards. The elements of quality control are de:
Quality Control Standards issued by the American Institute of
AICPA). The design of the system, and compliance with it, ar
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the
compliance with that system based on our review.
Our review was conducted in accordance with standards establ
Committee of the Center for Public Company Audit Firms and
perform the review that are summarized in the attached descrit
Our review would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in th
instances of lack of compliance with it since it was based on s¢
inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quali
system may occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any
control to future periods is subject to the risk that the system o
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degre
or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting
to the non-SEC issuers of Faw, Casson & Co., LLP in effect &
has been designed to meet the requirements of the quality cont
and auditing practice established by the AICPA, and was comy
ended to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of comply
standards.
7/ James E. Folsom
Team Captain
Page 12
Accountants Global Network
October 19, 2004 “Sharing Specialized Knowle
d Support”
To The Partners of
Faw, Casson & Co., LLP
And the Center for Public Company Audit Firms
Peer Review Committee
We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Faw,
Casson & Co., LLP applicable to non-SEC issuers in effect for the year ended May 31, 2004.
The firm has informed us that it did not audit SEC-issuers for the year ended May 31, 2004. A
system of quality control encompasses the firm’s organizational structure and the policies
adopted and procedures established to provide it with reasonable assurance of complying with
professional standards. The elements of quality control are described in the Statements on
Quality Control Standards issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (the
AICPA). The design of the system, and compliance with it, are the responsibilities of the firm,
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system, and the firm’s
compliance with that system based on our review.
Our review was conducted in accordance with standards established by the Peer Review
Committee of the Center for Public Company Audit Firms and included procedures to plan and
perform the review that are summarized in the attached description of the peer review process.
Our review would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system of quality control or all
instances of lack of compliance with it since it was based on selective tests. Because there are
inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quality control, departures from the
system may occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of a system of quality
control to future periods is subject to the risk that the system of quality control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice applicable
to the non-SEC issuers of Faw, Casson & Co., LLP in effect for the year ended May 31, 2004,
has been designed to: meet the requirements of the quality control standards for an accounting
and auditing practice established by the AICPA, and was complied with during the year then
ended to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of complying with applicable professional
standards.
James E. Folsom
Team Captain
Nort AMERICA
2851 South Parker Road, Suite 850 » Aurora, CO 80014
Phone: (303) 743-7880 - Fax: (303) 743-7660
http://wwwagn.org
Page 14
Planning the Review for the Firm’s Accounting and Auditing Practice Applicable to Non-
SEC issuers
To plan the review of Faw, Casson & Co., LLP, we obtained an understanding of (1) the nature
and extent of the firm’s accounting and auditing practice, and (2) the design of the firm’s system
of quality control sufficient to assess the inherent and control risks implicit in its practice,
Inherent risks were assessed by obtaining an understanding of the firm’s practice, such as the
industries of its clients and other factors of complexity in serving those clients, and the
organization of the firm’s personnel into practice units. Control risks were assessed by obtaining
an understanding of the design, of the firm’s system of quality control, including its audit
methodology, and monitoring procedures. Assessing control risk is the process of evaluating the
effectiveness of the reviewed firm’s system of quality control in preventing the performance of
engagements that do not comply with professional standards.
Performing the Review for the Firm’s Accounting and Auditing Practice Applicable to
Non-SEC issuers:
Based on our assessment of the combined level of inherent and control risks, we identified
practice units and selected engagements within those units to test for compliance with the firm’s
system of quality control. The engagements selected for review included engagements
performed under the Government Auditing Standards, an audit of a Non-Profit Entity, an audit of
a Manufacturing Company, and audits of Employee Benefit Plans. The engagements selected
for review represented a cross-section of the firm’s accounting and auditing practice with
emphasis on higher-risk engagements. The engagement reviews included examining working
paper files and reports and interviewing engagement personnel.
‘The scope of the peer review also included examining selected administrative and personnel files
to determine compliance with the firm’s policies and procedures for the elements of quality
control pertaining to independence, integrity, and objectivity; porsonncl management, and
acceptance and continuance of clients and engagements. Prior to concluding the review, we
reassessed the adequacy of scope and conducted a meeting with firm management to discuss our
findings and recommendations.
Page 15
PERSONNEL
ENGAGEMENT PARTNER ~ JANIS C. NESTERAK, CPA
Mrs, Nesterak, the Firm's Director of Accounting and Auditing, has twenty-nine
years of governmental auditing experience. She currently acts as engagement partner for the
City of Dover, Delaware and as independent technical reviewer for the City of Harrington and the
Boards of Education of Worcester and Wicomico Counties and several Maryland municipalities.
She serves on the Special Review Committee of the Government Finance Officers Association.
In this capacity, she reviews and judges governmental financial reports submitted to the GFOA
for consideration in the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in. Financial Reporting program.
She algo serves on the Peer Review Committee of the Delaware Society and Penneylvania
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. which accepts peer review reports of CPA firms.
She annually completes 40 - 50 hours of Continuing Professional Education
(CPE) specifically in the governmental accounting and auditing area. This CPE includes the
courses offered by the AICPA, Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants,
Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Delaware Society of Certified Public
Accountants and the Delaware Office of Auditor of Accountants.
Mrs. Nesterak, a Delaware and Maryland CPA, is a member of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Delaware Society of Certified Public Accountants,
Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants and the Government Finance Officer’s
Association.
INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEWER — RONALD W. HICKMAN, CPA
Mr. Hickman currently acts as engagement partner for the City of Harrington,
various Maryland municipalities and the Boards of Education of Worcester and Wicomico
Counties and as independent technical reviewer for the City of Dover. Mr. Hickman, a Maryland
CPA, is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Maryland
Association of Certified Public Accountants.
He annually completes 20 - 25 hours of CPE in the governmental accounting and
auditing area.
MANAGER - KIMBERLY A. FONDA, CPA
Mrs. Fonda has served on the City of Dover audit team for six years. She also
acts as in-charge auditor for several commercial audits and has recently served on audits of
Delaware schoo! districts. A Delaware CPA, Mrs. Fonda has eight years of governmental
experience and reguiarly receives 20 hours of CPE specific to the governmental environment.
Mrs. Fonda is a certified fraud examiner (CFE). She is a member of the AICPA and DSGPA.
Page 16
RECENT AUDIT WORK
CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE
Audit Of Financial Statements And Single Audit - June 30, 2006
Engagement Partner ~ Janis C. Nesterak
Hours ~ 675
Client Contact — Donna &. Mitchell, Finance Director
302-736-7018
WICOMICO BOARD OF EDUCATION, MARYLAND
Audit Of Financial Statements And Single Audit - June 30, 2006
Engagement Partner - Ronald W. Hickman
Hours ~ 400
Client Contact - E. Bruce Ford, Controller
410-677-4557
CITY OF HARRINGTON, DELAWARE
Audit Of Financial Statements.— June 30, 2005
! Ei p _R MMi an
We propose to audit the financial statements of the City of Dover for the years ending June 30, 2007
2011. Our audits will be conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Goverment
Standards, Issued by the Comptroller General of the United States: and. Office of Management and Budget
ircular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations. We will also provide
ce to the City to meet the requirements of the GFOA’s Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
| Reporting program.
4s the current auditors for the City, we have an understanding of the City’s internal control structure as of
2008. That knowledge is documented though memos and checklists. For the June 30, 2007 audit, we will
nd update these memos and checklists with City staff. Due to the changes in operations in the electric
3 will dedicate additional time to interviews of staff and reviews of policies and procedures to determine key
relative to the purchasing and expenditures cycles of the utility.
We will update our knowledge of laws and regulations that are significant to the audit by review of City
‘and committee) minutes and inquiry of management, finance and grants administration personnel,
Jpon completion of the updated documentation of the City's internat control structure, financial reporting
\ processing procedures, we will make an initial assessment of audit risk. Based on this assessment, we
gn our audit steps which will consist of tests of the Gity’s procedures and controls (tests of controls),
l tests and substantive tests (e.g. confirmations, review of supporting documentation, and observation of
as\ la antininata nelna taefe Af Anntenin anmhinand willl meek dient ue
through
Auditing
(OMB) (
assistan
Financia
June 30
review €
utility, w:
controls.
Council:
and date
will des!
analyticé
invantarl
Page 17
AUDIT APPROACH
We propose to audit the financial statements of the City of Dover for the years ending June 30, 2007
through 2011. Our audits will be conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; Government
Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptrotler General of the United States; and Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations. We will aiso provide
assistance to the City to meet the requirements of the GFOA’s Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
Financial Reporting prograrn.
As the current auditors for the City, we have an understanding of the City’s internal control structure as of
June 30, 2006. That knowledge is documented though memos and checklists. For the June 30, 2007 audit, we will
review and update these memos and checklists with City staff. Due to the changes in operations in the electric
utility, we will dedicate additional time to interviews of staff and reviews of policies and procedures to determine key
controls relative to the purchasing and. expenditures cycles of the utility.
We will update our knowledge of laws and regulations that'are significant to the audit by review of City
Council (and committee) minutes and inquiry of management, finance and grants administration personnel.
Upon completion of the updated documentation of the City’s internat control structure, financial reporting
and data processing procedures, we will make an initial assessment of audit risk. Based on this assessment, we
will design our audit steps which will consist of tests of the City's procedures and controls (tests of controls),
analytical tests and substantive tests (e.g, confirmations, review of supporting documentation, and observation of
inventories). We anticipate using tests of controls combined with analytical procedures to audit revenues,
expenditures and payroll and to use a substantive approach on balance sheet accounts. We expect to perform the
test of controls in early June. The samples selected for the tests will be varied depending on the anticipated
reliance on these tests, results of prior years’ tests, risk assessment, City personnel issues and other factors. It is
* not anticipated that statistical sampling will be used significantly nor that will any test require a sample in excess of
50.
Analytical procedures will be used in planning stages and as a primary or secondary audit procedure and
will include predictive tests, ratios, comparisons to budget and prior year’s information.
As the single audit consists of an internal control section and a compliance testing section, we will obtain
an understanding of the controls in place to ensure compliance with the requirements associated with each
particular major program and then test compliance with those requirements. The nature, timing and extent of the
compliance test will depend on the results on the internal contro! tests.
By July 10, we will provide the City with a detailed audit plan and a list of schedules to be prepared by the
City.
At the end of June, we expect to test controls over inventory by taking physical Inventory counts at the
City's warehouses and fuel storage facilities. Also, at the end of June, we will send confirmations for cash,
investments, bonds and pension information.
We do not anticipate a need to use EDP software in the audit.
The City anticipates that it will have ail of its individual funds (general, water/wastewater, electric and “small
funds”) ready for audit by August 31. in September, the audit manager and two staff auditors will perform audit
procedures that will include substantive and analytical procedures. We will review the preliminary drafts of these
funds’ financial statements/schedules as they are completed. Proposed adjusting entries will be presented to the
City as they are identified.
Page 18
AUDIT APPROACH - CONTINUED
In October, we will review successive drafts of the financial statements as they are prepared by the City
and will draft management letter recommendations for the City’s review. We. will work closely with the City's
finance department to have the financial statement drafts and auditor communications (and subsequent final
versions) to the City's Legistative, Finance and Administrative Committee at the designated times. Dependent
upon the City staff's completion of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, we will complete the single
audit procedures, The extent of these audit procedures will be determined by the number and complexity of the
major programs.
Our anticipated staffing and number of hours for this plan is as follows:
Discussions with staff regarding internal controls and fraud and other riske, and proparation of
documentation:
Partner 2 Hours
Manager 26 Hours
Review of Council.and Committee minutes:
Manager 25 Hours
Assessment of risk and design of audit programs:
Partner 10 Hours
Manager 60 Hours
Test of Controls;
Staff , 40 Hours
Inventory observation and tests of controls:
Manager 2 Hours
Staff 15 Hours
Third party confirmation requests and follow-up:
Staff 12 Hours
Performance and review of audit procedures on non-major funds:
Manager 10 Hours
Staff 40 Hours
Performance and review of specific audit procedures on major funds:
General:
Partner 4 Hours
Manager and Staff 65 Hours
Electric:
Partner 8 Hours
Manager and Staff 73 Hours
Water/Wastewater:
Partner 4 Hours
Manager and Staff 39 Hours
Page 19
AUDIT APPROACH - CONTINUED
Performance and review of audit procedures performed on an all funds basis:
Partner
Manager and Staff
5 Hours
46 Hours
Preliminary review of first draft of major fund financial statements:
Partner
A Aerinindentinn aad wacinnne ae ne af enn edetne Aik
Nature of Services Required.
sat it is willing and able to comply. with State of Delaware laws with
n-state of Delaware) corporations.
rat it is willing and able to obtain an errors and omissions insurance
dent amount of coverage for the willful or negligent acts, or omissions of
es or agents thereof.
hat it will not delegate or subcontract its responsibilities under an
3 prior written permission of the City of Dover.
at all information provided by it in connection with this proposal is true
erak
:Co., LLP
20 Hours
foe 1 a en
set forth In Section il,
Proposer warrants tt
respect to foreign (no
Proposer warrants tt
; policy providing a pru
any officers, employe
Proposer warrants t
agreement without th:
Proposer warrants th
and accurate,
ae
Vi cf
nature Of Official:
Name: Janis C. Nest
Title: Partner
Firm: Faw, Casson &
Date: April 13, 2007
Page 20
PROPOSER WARRANTIES
The proposer certifies it can and will provide and make available, as a minimum, all services
set forth In Section II, Nature of Services Required.
Proposer watrants that it is willing and able to comply with State of Delaware laws with
respect to foreign (non-state of Delaware) corporations.
. Proposer warrants that It is willing and able to obtain an errors and omissions insurance
policy providing a prudent amount of coverage for the wiliful or negligent acts, or omissions of
any officers, employees or agents thereof.
. Proposer warrants that it will not delegate or subcontract its responsibilities under an
agreement without the prior written permission of the City of Dover.
Proposer warrants that all information provided by It in connection with this proposal is true
and accurate,
— "
Signature Of Official:
Name: Janis C. Nesterak
Title: Partner
Firm: Faw, Casson & Co., LLP
Date: April 13, 2007
Page 21
How Clifton Gunderson Can Be an Asset to the City of Dover
Technical Section
Proposal to Provide Professional Auditing Services
Request for Proposal 07-0048FN
April 18, 2007
COPY
Prepared by:
Clifton Gunderson LLP
J. Michael Stephens, CPA, CFE, CGFM
Partner
9515 Deereco Road, Suite 500
Timonium, Maryland 21093
888-778-9588
Mike.Stephens@cliftoncpa.com
www.cliftoncpa.com
Clifton
Gunderson Lip
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 22
Table of Contents (Section B.1.b)
Transmittal Letter (Section 4.a.i1i)....ssssrscssssssssessessssessscseseenssesceneserscacenrecnesecneneesencnoesenceeesatescees 1
Technical Proposal (Section B
Independence (Section B.2) 3
License to Practice in Delaware (Section B.3) ...s.sssssessrsssecersnsssecessesnsecsecnnsscneavensecesensassorssenseseseses 3
Firm Qualifications and Experience (Section B.4) ..ssssccsssssssrserscerscsssenccesscserscsssrsasararsaconsnentscencerse 3
Partner, Supervisory and Staff Qualifications and Expertence (Sectton B.5) w.ssescsssssssscssesececssesersssees &
Similar Engagements with Other Government Entities (Section B.6) ....s.ssssseesssnsesesesressesesserseense 16
Specific Audit Approach (Section B.7)......008
Proposed Segmentation of Engagement (Section B.7.a)
Staff Assigned to Each Proposed Segment of Engagement (Section B.7.b) ..ssesserssceveeseeeevses
Sample Sizes and the Extent Statistical Sampling is to be Used (Section B.7.C).s.sssesccosvseseees
Extent and Use of EDP Software on the Engagement (Section B.7.d)
Type and Extent of Analytical Procedures to be Used (Section B.7.e) ..
Approach to be Taken to Gain and Document an Understanding of the City of Dover's
Internal Control Structure (Section B.7.f).....sssesessesecseeesseeeeeeees
Approach to Determining Laws and Regulations Subject to Test Work (Section B.7. 4). tenes
Approach to Drawing Audit Samples for Purposes of Tests of Compliance (Section B.7.h)......+«
Identification of Potential Audit Problems (Section B.8)....s-ssscscsssecseccserecsscnsensesecsesersesesecnescseeses 24
CONCLUSION ......ssscasssssecssscrssssssnsssssssssasssnessensssnsessssassssssesesssansnsssssssssasansnsssssnsessessnsesesssesssessesss 2D
Attachment A: License to Practice in the State of Delaware
Attachment B: Peer Review Report
Attachment C: Professional Resumes
Attachment D: Proposer Warranties
Ale ‘underson LLP
Cerlitied Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 23
Transmittal Letter (Section 4.a.iii)
April 18, 2007
Ms, Donna S, Mitchell
Treasurer/Finance Director
15 East Loockerman Street
Dover, Delaware 19901
Dear Ms, Mitchell:
Thank you for considering Clifton Gunderson as a provider of audit services for the City of Dover (the City).
We understand that the City is seeking a qualified CPA firm to audit its financial statements for the fiscal
years 2007 through 2011, The audits will be performed in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the standards set forth for financial audits in the General Accounting Office’s Government
Auditing Standards (2006), the provisions of the Single Audit Act of 1984 (as amended by the Single Audit
Act of 1996) and US Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments,
and Non-Profit Organizations, as well as the City of Dover, Charter, Article IV.
We are confident that our substantial experience providing audit and accounting services to cities and
other governmental entities, bolstered by our service-oriented philosophy and depth of resources, will
make Clifton Gunderson the ideal candidate to fulfill the scope of your audit. We are committed to
performing this work within the desired time periods established in Request for Proposal 07-0048FN, and
have the knowledge and resources to complete the engagement in an efficient and effective manner.
Following is a sampling of qualities that set Clifton Gunderson apart from other firms:
¢ Experience. The City will be served by members of our local Government Services Team, which has
one of the fastest growing governmental practices in the State of Delaware. In addition to over
60 governmental clients in Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia, this team currently performs
audit engagements for a variety of Delaware-based governmental entities, such as Delaware State
University and New Castle County. In fact, due to the continued growth of our Delaware-based
governmental practice, Clifton Gunderson recently announced the opening of a new office in
Newark, Delaware, which we intend to be full service and open by June 1.
¢ Understanding. The members of our local Governmental Services Team have a thorough
understanding of the issues and challenges faced by governmental entities in Delaware. For
example, Lori Stoughton, the senior audit manager assigned to your engagement team, recently
joined Clifton Gunderson from the State of Delaware, where she served as deputy auditor of the
lifton ;
anderson LLP City of Dover 1
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 24
State. Her knowledge, combined with the insight of our seasoned, tocal professionals will allow
for a more efficient, effective engagement - saving you time and money.
« Resources. In addition to the over 100 members of our local Governmental Services Team, the
City will have access to Clifton Gunderson’s extensive network of governmental resources,
including key members of the firm-wide Governmental Services Team.
Clifton Gunderson takes no exceptions to the requirements of the Request for Proposal (RFP). Our
proposal is a firm and irrevocable offer for ninely (90) days after Lhe proposal due date.
We appreciate being considered for this work and assure you, if it is entrusted to us, that you will receive
the high level of close, personal attention that you deserve. We would be pleased to discuss this proposal
in greater detail and make a presentation to you as you prepare to select a CPA firm. Please contact me at
888-778-9588 or Mike,Stephens@cliftoncpa.com to answer any questions.
Sincerely,
CLIFTON GUNDERSON LLP
J. Michael Stephens, CPA, CFE, CGFM
Partner
Cikerrers Gunderson LLP City of Dover
Cortitied Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 25
Technical Proposal (section B)
Independence (Section B.2)
Clifton Gunderson is independent of the City of Dover as defined by generally accepted auditing standards
and the U.S. Government Accountability Office’s Government Auditing Standards.
Clifton Gunderson has not had any professional relationships involving the City of Dover or any of its
agencies for the past five (5) years.
We understand that we shall provide the City written notice of any professional relationships entered into
during the period of this agreement.
, License to Practice in Delaware (Section B.3)
Clifton Gunderson LLP is licensed to practice public accounting in the State of Delaware. The firm’s license
to practice in the State of Delaware is included in Attachment A.
J. Michael Stephens, the partner-in-charge of your engagement, will apply to become licensed in the
State of Delaware upon award notification and prior to commencing work. Keith Novak, the unassociated
audit review partner, and Lori Stoughton, the senior audit manager, possess certified public accountant
licenses for the State of Delaware. All CPAs working on this engagement either have or will obtain
: necessary state licensure to properly practice in Delaware.
‘ng Governmental Entities Extensive Experience Servi
1 largest governmental audit practices in the country. We currently serve Clifton Gunderson has one of tt
entities nationwide, including cities, counties, state agencies, housing more than 1,000 governmental
ital Services Team has experience in all aspects of governmental auditing, authorities, etc. Our Governme
agements, and has assisted several clients in earning and retaining the accounting and consulting eng
‘xcetlence in Financial Reporting. Certificate of Achievement for f
dur experience in providing services to state and local governmental The following table highlights «
entities nationwide:
Page 26
Extensive Experience Serving Governmental Entities
Clifton Gunderson has one of the largest governmental audit practices in the country. We currently serve
more than 1,000 governmental entities nationwide, including cities, counties, state agencies, housing
authorities, etc. Our Governmental Services Team has experience in all aspects of governmental auditing,
accounting and consulting engagements, and has assisted several clients in earning and retaining the
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting.
The following table highlights our experience in providing services to state and local governmental
entities nationwide:
State Higher Housing
Agencies Counties Municipalities Education* Aut i
Arizona x Xx
Colorado x x- X x x x
Delaware x x
District of x
Columbia
Georgia xX
Idaho x
Iinois x x Xx xX x x
Indiana x x x
Towa x X Xx x x
Kansas X
Maryland x x x x x x x
Mississippi x
Missouri x
Nevada x x
New York |
North Carolina x x
Ohio x x
Pennsylvania x Xx x
South Carolina x
Texas . X XxX x x
Virginia X x X x x x
Washington X
West Virginia Xx
Wisconsin X x X Xx x x x
Clifton ;
A Gunderson LLP City of Dover 4
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 27
Locally, the professionals who will serve the City currently serve over 70 governmental entities, including
numerous cities, county governments, and specialized taxing districts and authorities in the Mid-Atlantic
region. The City will benefit from this valuable expertise,
Federal A-133 Audit Clients, Continued
¢ Carroll County Board of Education ¢ Harford County Board of Education
«Cecil Community College ¢ Housing Authority of Baltimore City
«Civic Works . * Howard Community College
« Community Colleges of Baltimore ¢ Howard County Board of Education
County « Maryland Committee for Children
* Nelaware County Community College * Montgomery County Public Schoals
e District of Columbia Housing Authority * Montgomery Housing Opportunities
¢ Frederick Community College Commission
e Frederick County Board of Education « Newport News Board of Education
© Harford Community College ¢ Northern Virginia Regional Commission
* Harford Community Action Agency * Queen Anne’s County, Maryland
The staff members assigned to your audit have performed hundreds of such audits and have received
specialized training in governmental accounting, auditing and financial reporting, In addition, they
receive training on the compliance requirements of OMB Circular A-133 and the use of the related
compliance supplements.
Size of Governmental Audit Practice
Over 100 professionals comprise our local Governmental Services Team. These individuals serve
governmental entities in Delaware, Maryland and surrounding states, as well as clients across the
country, Additionally, we have access to firm-wide experts and resources as needed to fulfill the
requirements of the contract.
Location from Which the Work Will Be Performed
The City will be served by members of our local Governmental Services Team, currently staffed by
professionals in our Baltimore, Maryland office. Due to the growth of our Delaware and greater
Philadelphia governmental practice, Clifton Gunderson recently announced the opening of a new office in
Delaware, which we intend to be full service and open by June 1. We anticipate that work for this
engagement will be performed from both the Baltimore, Maryland and Delaware offices.
Page 28
Federal A-133 Audit Clients, Continued
© Carroll County Board of Education © Harford County Board of Education
« Cecil Community College ¢ Housing Authority of Baltimore City
© Civic Works © Howard Community College
* Community Colleges of Baltimore ¢ Howard County Board of Education
County © Maryland Committee for Children
¢ Delaware County Community College e Montgomery County Public Schools
© District of Columbia Housing Authority * Montgomery Housing Opportunities
e Frederick Community College Commission
e Frederick County Board of Education ¢ Newport News Board of Education
¢ Harford Community College ¢ Northern Virginia Regional Commission
* Harford Community Action Agency * Queen Anne’s County, Maryland
The staff members assigned to your audit have performed hundreds of such audits and have received
specialized training in governmental accounting, auditing and financial reporting, In addition, they
receive training on the compliance requirements of OMB Circular A-133 and the use of the related
compliance supplements.
Size of Governmental Audit Practice
Over 100 professionals comprise our local Governmental Services Team. These individuals serve
governmental entities in Delaware, Maryland and surrounding states, as well as clients across the
country, Additionally, we have access to firm-wide experts and resources as needed to fulfill the
requirements of the contract.
Location from Which the Work Will Be Performed
The City will be served by members of our local Governmental Services Team, currently staffed by
professionals in our Baltimore, Maryland office. Due to the growth of our Delaware and greater
Philadelphia governmental practice, Clifton Gunderson recently announced the opening of a new office in
Delaware, which we intend to be full service and open by June 1. We anticipate that work for this
engagement will be performed from both the Baltimore, Maryland and Delaware offices.
Following is the address of the Baltimore office (also the local Governmental Services Team
headquarters):
Timonium Corporate Center
9515 Deereco Road, Suite 500
Timonium, Maryland 21093
888-778-9588
Chifto: ;
A Gunderson LLP City of Dover 6
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 30
engagements. A copy of our most recent peer review report, dated December 14, 2004, has been
included in Attachment B.
* — Clifton Gunderson has also developed a quality control manual to dictate the quality control
standards and policies of our firm. These standards often exceed requirements set forth by
professional standards and governmental guidelines. To monitor the adherence to policies and
procedures, and to assure the quality and accuracy of services provided meet our high standard of
client services, each office must have a regular internal examination performed by professionals
from other firm offices,
¢ We follow quality control standards as prescribed by the AICPA and the Government
Accountability Office. A partner-in-charge is involved in the planning, fieldwork and post
fieldwork review. In addition, a second partner reviews the audit prior to issuance of the reports.
Federal or State Desk Reviews or Field Reviews
Clifton Gunderson has been subject to several federal and state desk reviews by state oversight agencies
during the past three years, and we have had no findings. In addition, our government audits are subject
to review by each agency's Office of Inspector General, as well as the U.S. Government Accountability
Office. The results of these reviews indicated that our reports and workpapers met all reporting
requirements specific to the engagement and that the workpapers complied with all specified criteria.
Disciplinary Actions Taken
There have been no terminations or disciplinary actions taken, and there are none pending, against
Clifton Gunderson during the past three years with any regulatory bodies or professional organizations.
Partner, Supervisory and Staff Qualifications and Experience (Section B.5)
The professionals at Clifton Gunderson operate as a team. We
have found that the best way to thoroughly meet the needs of The close, personal attention
our clients is to work together, utilizing each other's areas of
specialty. Our partners and managers stay closely involved from our senior level personnel,
with all of our clients, so you know your engagement will be
handled with the highest degree of accuracy and combined with our low partner-
professionalism. to-staff ratio, sets Clifton
We have structured your client service team to provide you Gunderson apart from many other
with the most experience with audit and accounting issues
related to city governments. Our team of professionals is CPA firms.
knowledgeable about the changing rules, regulations,
standards, and market trends you face, and spend upwards of 60 percent of their time working solely with
the government sector. Furthermore, our national network of CPAs and consultants means that if you
need Specialized help, we have a professional on staff who can provide it.
Al citten “A Gunderson LLP City of Dover 8
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 31
As previously noted, all CPAs assigned to your engagement team either have or will obtain necessary state
licensure to practice in Delaware upon contract award.
Your engagement team will include the following members of our local Governmental Services Team:
J. Michael Stephens, CPA, CFE, CGFM - Engagement Partner-in-Charge
As the partner-in-charge of the City’s engagement. team, Mike will oversee all engagement.
responsibilities for the audit, including reviewing the audit program, coordinating activities with the
senior audit manager, and directing all meetings with the City. Mike will be available throughout the
engagement and at any time during the year.
Mike specializes in governmental auditing and accounting services, including the audits of state, local
and federal entities. He also has experience in dealing with fraud, having worked on approximately 30
fraud engagements with all types of organizations, including government and nonprofit entities.
During his career of more than 21 years, Mike has developed significant state and local government audit
experience. His recent state and local government clients include Artington County, Virginia; Maryland
Environmental Service; Anne Arundel County, Maryland; Queen Anne’s County, Maryland; Arlington
County Public Schools; City of Havre de Grace, Maryland; City of Greenbelt, Maryland; Northern Virginia
Regional Commission; District of Columbia Housing Authority; Housing Authority of Baltimore City; and
Arlington County Employees’ Retirement System.
Mike is a member of the Association of Government Accountants, American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants and the Association of Certified Fraud
Examiners. He has a bachelor of science degree with a major in accounting from Loyola College in
Maryland.
His relevant continuing professional education during the past three years has included:
2006
Clifton Gunderson Designated Single Audit Reviewer Webcast (2 hours)
MACPA 2006 Government and Not-for-Profit Conference (8 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Evaluation Training (1.5 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Auditing Updates Training (8 hours)
AHACPA PHA Financial Conference (16 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Single Audits (4 hours)
Business Learning Institute Ethics: Approaches and Application (4 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Annual Assurance Services Conference (16.5 hours)
AICPA Accounting for Leases (2 hours)
eoroecere eee
Guiftan son LLP City of Dover 9
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 32
AICPA Standards Update and Implementation Guide (6 hours)
MACPA 2005 Government and Not-for-Profit Conference (8 hours)
‘of Accountants, and the Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants. Keith has a bachelor
science degree with a major in accounting from the University of Maryland.
His recent relevant continuing professional education for the past three years includes:
2006
© Maryland Government Finance Officers Association Winter Conference (6 hours)
© Maryland Association of CPA’s “Yellow Book Update,” presenter {1 hour)
Government Finance Officers Association of United States and Canada Annual Conferenc
hours)
Clifton Gunderson Audit Updates Seminar (8 hours)
Maryland Government Finance Officers Association Summer Conference (6 hours)
Maryland Association of Community Colleges Annual Update (1 hour)
Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants Ethics: Approaches and Applicatio
i hours)
e(10
eevee
as (4
Ino
IS
IS
foi
Maryland Government Finance Officers Association GASB Update (3 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Independence Rules for Firm Professionals (4 hours)
Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants Government and Not-for-Profit Up
hours)
g- ; ) « Maryland Government Finance Officers Association Intermediate Government Accountin
instructor (20 hours)
ite- « Maryland Association of Community College Business Officers GASB Nos. 43 and 45 Updi
instructor (2 hours}
9 hours) * Maryland Association of Government Finance Officers Association Summer Conference ('
Clifton Gunderson Intermediate Government Accounting- instructor (6 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Single Audit Update (1 hour)
Me © Clifton Gunderson Audits of Community Colleges (2 hours) - Instructor
Clifton Gunderson Audits of Higher Education (4 hours) - Instructor
eee
date (8
.
onns
Page 33
Accountants, and the Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants. Keith has a bachelor of
science degree with a major in accounting from the University of Maryland.
His recent relevant continuing professional education for the past three years includes:
2006
* Maryland Government Finance Officers Association Winter Conference (6 hours)
© Maryland Association of CPA’s “Yellow Book Update,” presenter (1 hour)
Government Finance Officers Association of United States and Canada Annual Conference (10
hours)
Clifton Gunderson Audit Updates Seminar (8 hours)
Maryland Government Finance Officers Association Summer Conference (6 hours)
Maryland Association of Community Colleges Annual Update (1 hour)
Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants Ethics: Approaches and Applications (4
hours)
eee
In
iS
iO
io
Maryland Government Finance Officers Association GASB Update (3 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Independence Rules for Firm Professionals (4 hours)
Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants Government and Not-for-Profit Update (8
hours)
* Maryland Government Finance Officers Association Intermediate Government Accounting-
instructor (20 hours)
Maryland Association of Community College Business Officers GASB Nos. 43 and 45 Update-
instructor (2 hours)
Maryland Association of Government Finance Officers Association Summer Conference (9 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Intermediate Government Accounting- instructor (6 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Single Audit Update (1 hour)
Clifton Gunderson Audits of Community Colleges (2 hours) - Instructor
Clifton Gunderson Audits of Higher Education (4 hours) - Instructor
eoeee ° eee
Ino
iS
I>
iS
AICPA CPE Direct (8 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Audit and Accounting Update (8 hours)
Maryland Government Finance Officers Association Winter Technical Update (3 hours)
AICPA The Big Picture (1.5 hours)
AICPA Audit and Accounting Independence (3.5 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Assurance Services Training (12 hours)
Maryland Government Finance Officers Association GASB# 40 - Everything You Want to Know -
Instructor (2 hours)
Government Finance Officers Association New Implementation Guidance from GASB (1 hour)
Government Finance Officers Association Applying the Latest Audit Guidance (2 hours)
Ciiftga on LLP City of Dover 1
Cerfified Public Accountants & Consultants
eoecveee
Page 34
Government Finance Officers Association Rooting Out Fraud in the Public Sector (2 hours)
Government Finance Officers Association Accounting for Postretirement Healthcare (2 hours)
AICPA Spring Standards Update and Implementation (4 hours)
Clifton Gunderson GASB Update (2 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Government Day (8 hours)
North Carolina Government Finance Officers Association Summer Meeting (5 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Independence Update and SAS 99 (3 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Audit and Accounting Update (4 hours)
Lori Stoughton, CPA, CICA - Senior Audit Manager
As the senior manager of your engagement team, Lori will be responsible for the overall direction of the
engagement and will be one of your day-to-day contacts. She will also be available throughout the
engagement and at any time during the year,
Lori has been actively involved in the performance of financial and compliance audits of government
entities for more than 13 years. She is an expert in the performance of single audits and GASB
implementation, and recently joined Clifton Gunderson from the State of Delaware, where she served as
deputy auditor of the State. In this position, she managed an extensive number of financial statement
audits, performance audits and agreed-upon procedures, and was responsible for providing training to
municipal governments regarding GASB 43 and 45 requirements for Other Post Employment Benefits.
to, ber sw i L 4 loved. by.a“Ria.JW accounting firm and canted ac a.cantar
Py
State of Delaware Division of Revenue Tax Conferenc
GFOA Government GAAP Update (4 hours)
KPMG Single Audit (4 hours)
Thomson Risk Assessment (12 hours)
Government Finance Officers Association Conference
2 (6.5 hours)
oeoeree
(19 hours)
8
AICPA Tax Planning (15 hours)
KPMG SOX in Government (3 hours)
National State Auditors Association Conference (16 |
AOA Financial Statement Audit (5 hours)
AOA Professional Ethics (3 hours)
yours)
nm
Ss
r=
Page 35
«State of Delaware Division of Revenue Tax Conference (6.5 hours)
© —GFOA Government GAAP Update (4 hours)
© KPMG Single Audit (4 hours)
¢ Thomson Risk Assessment (12 hours)
© Government Finance Officers Association Conference (19 hours)
@ AICPA Tax Planning (415 hours)
* KPMG SOX in Government (3 hours)
¢ National State Auditors Association Conference (16 hours)
* AOA Financial Statement Audit (5 hours)
© AOA Professional Ethics (3 hours)
NASCAT Ethics (2 hours)
AICPA Professional Ethics (18 hours)
AICPA Government Accounting Update (16 hours)
AOA Internal Controls (4 hours)
Charles Kelly, Audit Manager
Chuck will serve as an audit manager assigned to the engagement team, and will perform fieldwork. Chuck
' has over four years of experience specializing in auditing and accounting with an emphasis on
governmental entities, He is thoroughly versed in single audits, and is actively involved in the financial
and compliance audits of a number of our governmental clients, including the State of South Carolina,
Delaware County Community College and Howard Community College. He holds a master’s degree in
accounting and a bachelor of science degree with a double major in accounting and finance from Virginia
Polytechnic Institute.
His relevant continuing professional education during the past three years has included:
2006
Clifton Gunderson Assurance Update (8.5 hours}
Clifton Gunderson Ethics: Approaches and Applications (4 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Software Training (4 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Single Audits (4 hours)
Clifton Gunderson CAAT Software Training (8 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Wisdom (26.5 hours)
Lazard Dana SFA Training (24 hours)
Clifton
Gunderson LLP City of Dover 3B
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 36
2005
* Clifton Gunderson Nonprofit Training (3 hours)
¢ Clifton Gunderson Community College Audit Training (4 hours)
* Clifton Gunderson Single Audit Training (4 hours)
¢ — Clifton Gunderson Independence Rules for Firm Professionals (4 hours)
¢ MACPA Government Day (8 hours)
¢ Clifton Gunderson Audit and Accounting Procedures Update (8 hours)
© MGFOA Spring Conference (3 hours)
2004
°
.
.
.
.
Clifton Gunderson Financial Institutions/Credit Unions (8 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Audit and Accounting Conference (8 hours)
Clifton Gunderson Government Day (8 hours}
Clifton Gunderson State and Local Government Training (8 hours)
AICPA Intermediate Staff Training (9.5 hours)
Michael A. DaGrossa, CISSP, CCE, CEH, Senior IT Manager - Information Technology Resource
Mike will be available as a key IT resource, and will available throughout the engagement. He has over ten
years of experience, and provides solutions-oriented IT risk management services to organizations of all
types and sizes. Formerly with AIG, Michael created and led the company’s IT Risk Management Group.
Michael’s expertise lies in information security strategy, computer forensics, system design and
implementation, and business continuity and disaster recovery planning. He has a proven track record of
managing audits and regulatory compliance from an IT perspective,
Michael is a member of the AIG Global Security Steering Committee, AIG Global TRC Technical Review
Committee and the ASIS. In addition, he is program director for the Board of Directors Infragard. He has a
bachelor of science degree with a major in business management from the University of Phoenix.
Staff Assigned to the Engagement Team
In addition, we will assign senior associates and associates with governmental audit experience as
needed to assist in performing the assigned audit tasks. These staff members will be determined based on
the final scheduling of audit tasks with management.
Staff Continuity
Itis the policy of the firm to consistently maintain the same staff on engagements to ensure continuity to
the client. This will allow us to maximize efficiencies, and reduce the learning curve of a new engagement
team. These professionals are knowledgeable about the changing rules, regulations, standards, and
trends affecting state, local and federal governmental agencies.
Page 37
Project assignments are based on experience and expertise, the degree of technical proficiency required,
timing and workload levels, and the supervisory staff to be involved in a specific engagement. We clearly
understand that our ability to serve our clients lies in the quality of our staff.
Quality of Staff During the Engagement
The firm is dedicated to ensuring only the highest-
quality staffing arrangements for each of its clients. Our
firm requires all partners and staff to annually
participate in a minimum of 40 hours of continuing
professional education courses, This includes a
minimum of 24 hours every two years directly related to
governmental auditing in accordance with the
standards set forth in the Yellow Book,
Changes in Supervisory Staff
Engagement partners, managers, other supervisory
staff and specialists may be changed if they leave the
firm, are promoted or assigned to another office. These
personnel may also be changed for other reasons with
the express prior written permission of the City. We
understand, as stated in the RFP, that the City retains
the right to approve or reject replacements.
Changes in Audit Personnel
The local office that will serve the City is a
finalist in the Baltimore Business
Journal's 2007 Best Places to Work Awards
Program ... this speaks volumes of the
Jirm’s commitment to recruiting
and retaining
high-quality
professionals.
We understand that other audit personnel may be changed at our discretion provided that replacements
have substantially the same or better qualifications or experience.
Clifton
Gunderson LLP
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
City of Dover 15
Page 38
Similar Engagements with Other Government Entities (Section B.6)
Following is a sampling of significant engagements performed in the last three years by the members of our
local team. We encourage you to contact these references to learn more about our experience and commitment
to quality client services.
New Castle County, Delaware
87 Reads Way
New Castle, Delaware 19720
Contact: Mr. Michael Strine
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Phone: 302-395-5279
Services Provided: Financial statement audit in accordance with Governmental Auditing Standards and
single audit in accordance with OMB Circular A-133
Length of Service: May 2006 - Present
Hours: 1,200
Partner-in-Charge: Keith F. Novak
Town of Ocean City, Maryland
P.O. Box 158
Ocean City, Maryland 21843
Contact: Ms. Martha Bennett
Title: Finance Officer
Phone: 410-289-8941
Services Provided: Financial statement audit in accordance with Governmental Auditing Standards and
single audit in accordance with OMB Circular A-133
Length of Service: June 2002 - Present
Hours: 600
Partner-in-Charge: Keith F. Novak
Dover Federal Credit Union
P.O. Box 02009
Dover Air Force Base, Delaware 19902
Contact: David Clendaniel
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Phone: 302-678-8646
Services Provided: Financial statement audit
Length of Service: 2004 — Present
Hours: 400
Clifton Gunderson Partner-in-Charge: Mark W. Gillett
Clifton .
Gunderson LLP City of Dover
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
16
Page 39
Inaddition to the references above, our local office has provided auditing and accounting services to a variety of
government entities in the Last three years. A sampling of these similar in scope to the City is as follows:
Specific Audit Approach (Section B.7)
Our audit objective extends beyond the issuing of an opinion on financial statements. We believe that
good audit will yield substantial information for management and is a valuable tool in recognizing
opportunities and identifying areas that can be strengthened. An effective audit performed by our tea
and focused on the City will also provide:
An objective look at your policies and procedures
Valuable suggestions for improvements in your financial operations and other areas
An analysis of trends and unusual variations from year-to-year
Protection for current and future resources through improved internal controls
A deterrent to embezzlement and other fraudutent activities
Proposed Segmentation of the Engagement (Section B.7.a)
We will conduct our audit of the City in four primary phases:
Phase 1 - Planning
Phase 2 - Internal Control and Documentation (Fieldwork)
Phase 3 ~ Testing and Review (Fieldwork)
Phase 4 ~ Reporting and Meetings
Staff Assigned to Each Proposed Segment of the Engagement (Section B.7.b)
The following chart provides information regarding level of staff and number of hours to be assigned t
each proposed segment of the engagement:
Number of Hours byStaff Level
Engagement Partner Managers Supervisory Audit Staff
Seqment Staff
Planning 8 16 28 8 60
Fieldwork 17 46 133 114 310
Reporting and
Meetings a 8 16 32 4 60
Single Audit 4 10 __ 32 24 70
Total Hours 37 88 224 150 500
Page 40
Specific Audit Approach (Section B.7)
Our audit objective extends beyond the issuing of an opinion on financial statements. We believe that a
good audit will yield substantial information for management and is a valuable tool in recognizing
opportunities and identifying areas that can be strengthened. An effective audit performed by our team
and focused on the City will also provide:
An objective look at your policies and procedures
Valuable suggestions for improvements in your financial operations and other areas
An analysis of trends and unusual variations from year-to-year
Protection for current and future resources through improved internal controls
A deterrent to embezzlement and other fraudulent activities
Proposed Segmentation of the Engagement (Section B.7.a)
We will conduct our audit of the City in four primary phases:
Phase 1 ~ Planning
Phase 2 - Internal Control and Documentation (Fieldwork)
Phase 3 - Testing and Review (Fieldwork)
Phase 4 - Reporting and Meetings
Staff Assigned to Each Proposed Segment of the Engagement (Section B.7.b)
The following chart provides information regarding level of staff and number of hours to be assigned to
each proposed segment of the engagement:
Number of Hours. by Staff Level
Engagement Partner Managers Supervisory Audit Staff
Segment Staff
Planning 8 16 28 8 60
Fieldwork 17 46 133 114 310
Reporting and
Meetings 8 16 32 4 60
Single Audit 4 10 __ 32 24 70
Total Hours 37 J 88 2 150 500
Sample Sizes and the Extent to which Statistical Sampling is to be Used (Section B.7.c)
We extensively use statistical and non-statistical sampling during our audits of governmental entities.
The sampling techniques vary depending upon the nature of the test, such as internal control reliance,
substantive testing and transactional testing. Our sample sizes are directly related to the various risks
{inherent and control) associated with the item being tested, confidence level to be obtained and overall
materiality. Our sample sizes generally range to 30 items for control and transactional testing. The
samples for substantive testing are highly dependent upon the balance of the account being tested and
the materiality of the engagement.
funderson LLP City of Dover 18
Certified Fublic Accountants & Consultants
Page 41
We plan to determine the scope of work by applying the concepts of materiality and risk assessment to
effectively reduce examination inefficiencies. Our strategy for the EDP review of the applications will
involve reviewing all of the general control activities, including the computerized and manual processes.
During the planning phase of the engagement, we plan to gain an understanding of the City’s operations
by reviewing their current controls and control objectives as documented. We will also review prior years’
audit work and the status of corrective actions. Based on our preliminary review, we will perform an
initial risk assessment of each critical element in each general control category, as well as an overall
assessment of each control category. We will also develop preliminary estimates of materiality to assist in
developing our audit plan. We will then proceed to assess the significant computer-related controls.
For those controls that we deem to be ineffectively designed or not operating as intended, we will gather
sufficient evidence to support appropriate findings and to provide recommendations to improve internal
controls. For those controls we deem to be effectively designed, we will perform testing to determine
that they are operating as intended through a combination of procedures, including observation, inquiry,
inspection, and re-performance.
Our audit service is designed to protect the interests of management by concentrating on high-risk areas.
Risk identification is the first step of the audit process, providing the basis upon which the overall plan is
developed. Our risk assessment process involves consideration of the following types of risk:
© Inherent risk - the risk that an error in the accounting and reporting process may occur
¢ = Control risk - the risk that internal control systems designed to prevent or detect errors may fail
« Audit detection risk - the risk that audit procedures may fail to detect errors
Through careful consideration of the above risks and their interrelationships, we will develop an audit
plan and related programs that concentrate our efforts on those elements of your financial statements
that involve the greatest risk. At the same time, we will avoid the unnecessary application of
commonplace and traditional procedures to low-risk areas.
Extent of Use of EDP Software in the Engagement (Section B.7.d)
Virtually all of our larger governmental clients have highly sophisticated computerized accounting
systems. We will employ EDP Software throughout the entire audit to ensure efficiency and effectiveness.
Page 42
Extent of Use of EDP Software in the Engagement (Section B.7.d)
Virtuatly all of our larger governmental clients have highly sophisticated computerized accounting
systems. We will employ EDP Software throughout the entire audit to ensure efficiency and effectiveness.
Throughout the audit we will employ the use of CAATs to increase efficiency and effectiveness. The key
CAATs that we will use are as follows:
* ACL- ACL benefits the audit process through:
o Built-in audit functionality including powerful, audit specific commands and a self-
documenting audit trail
© 100 percent data coverage, which means certain audit procedures can be performed on
entire populations, not just samples
o Unparalleled data access allows us to access and analyze data from virtually any
computing environment
o Eliminates the need to extrapolate information from errors (a common effort when
manually auditing data) and allows for more precise conclusions
¢ Datalmport - Datalmport is data conversion software that translates text-based data from
virtually any source into nearly 40 database and spreadsheet formats, including Access, Excel,
HTML tables, dBase applications, and many others, We use Datalmport to extract data out of
mainframe reports and data dumps, print-to-disk files, downloaded information, e-mail, or any
other text file accessible on a PC.
These tools will allow us to more efficiently and effectively test the customer and vendor databases for
sampling purposes.
Type and Extent of Analytical Procedures to be Used (Section B.7.¢)
Preliminary Analytical Procedures will assist in planning the nature, timing and extent of auditing
procedures that will be used to obtain evidential matter. These procedures will focus on enhancing our
understanding of the financial results. These procedures are also used to identify any significant
transactions and events that have occurred since the last audit date, as weil as to identify any areas that
may represent specific risks relevant to the audit.
In performing our substantive testing, our audit efficiency initiative provides that we think analytically
first. By thinking analytically first, we can we can better understand the specific account balance being
tested and determine if the current balance or relationship with other account balances appears
reasonable. We will also employ analytical testing on smaller and/or lower risk accounts and cycles to
maintain efficiency and to meet milestones.
Al citten Gunderson Lip City of Dover 20
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 43
, Approach to be Taken to Gain and Document an Understanding of the City of Dover's
Internal Control Structure (Section B.7.f)
During the planning and internal control phases of our audit, we will develop our understanding of the
droach to Determining Laws and Regulations Subject to Test Work (Section B.7.g) : Ap)
determination of the laws and regulations that will be subject to audit test will be based on the Our
awing: : foll
* — Review of the City of Dover Code of Ordinances
¢ Review of Delaware State Code, as it applies to municipalities
* Review of the Code of Federal Regulations related to the City’s major program
© — Review of prior auditor's workpapers
© Inquiries of management, legal counsel and appropriate personnel
jroach to Drawing Audit Samples for Purposes of Tests of Compliance (Section B.7.h) Ap)
ulations Greater than 100 Pop
samples for purposes of compliance testing for populations greater than 100 are drawn randomly The
nthe population of transactions utilizing applicable numerical sample techniques. These techniques frot
sider confidence level, tolerable error and attribute risk in determining sample sizes. As discussed con
viously, we will use dual-purpose testing whenever possible to increase audit efficiency. : pre
ulations Less than 100 ' Por
samples for purposes of compliance testing for populations less than 100 are 25 percent of the The
ulation or the identification and testing of individually significant transactions to obtain adequate ; por
ulation coverage. an) Por
dorts to be Issued 4 Re]
owing the completion of the audit of the fiscal year's financial statements, we will issue: Foll
© Areport on the fair presentation of the financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles, including an opinion on the fair presentation of the
supplementary schedule of expenditures of federal awards in relation to the audited financial
statements. a
© Areport on compliance and internal control over financial reporting based on an audit of the
financial statements.
Page 44
Approach to Determining Laws and Regulations Subject to Test Work (Section B.7.g)
Our determination of the laws and regulations that will be subject to audit test will be based on the
following:
.
.
.
.
.
Review of the City of Dover Code of Ordinances
Review of Delaware State Code, as it applies to municipalities
Review of the Code of Federal Regulations related to the City’s major program
Review of prior auditor’s workpapers
Inquiries of management, legal counsel and appropriate personnel
Approach to Drawing Audit Samples for Purposes of Tests of Compliance (Section B.7.h)
Populations Greater than 100
The samples for purposes of compliance testing for populations greater than 100 are drawn randomly
from the population of transactions utilizing applicable numerical sample techniques. These techniques
consider confidence level, tolerable error and attribute risk in determining sample sizes. As discussed
previously, we will use dual-purpose testing whenever possible to increase audit efficiency.
Po: ions Less than 100
The samples for purposes of comptiance testing for populations less than 100 are 25 percent of the
population or the identification and testing of individually significant transactions to obtain adequate
population coverage.
Reports to be Issued
Following the completion of the audit of the fiscal year's financial statements, we will issue:
¢ Areport on the fair presentation of the financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles, including an opinion on the fair presentation of Lhe
supplementary schedule of expenditures of federal awards jn relation to the audited financial
statements.
¢ Areport on compliance and internal control over financial reporting based on an audit of the
financial statements.
¢ —Areport on compliance and internal control over compliance applicable to each major federal
program.
In the required report(s) on compliance and internal controls, we will communicate any reportable
conditions found during the audit. A reportable condition shall be detined as a significant deficiency in
the design or operation of the internal control structure which could adversely affect the organization's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data consistent with the assertions of
management in the financial statements.
Clifton ;
Gunderson LLP City of Dover 22
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 45
The report on compliance and internal controls shall include all material instances of noncompliance. ALL
nonmaterial instances of noncompliance will be reported in a separate management letter, which shall be
teferred to in the report on compliance and internal controls.
Irregularities and Illegal acts. We will make an immediate, written report to appropriate parties of all
irregularities and illegal acts or indications of illegal acts of which we become aware.
Reporting to the L. F. & A. Committee. We will ensure that the City of Dover's L. F. & A. committee is
informed of each of the following:
1. Our responsibitity under generally accepted auditing standards
2. Significant accounting policies
3. Management judgments and accounting estimates
4, Significant audit adjustments
5. Other information in documents containing audited financial statements
6. Disagreements with management
7. Management consultation with other accountants
8. Major issues discussed with management prior to retention
9. Difficulties encountered in performing the audit
Timeline
Segment/Deliverable Completed by
Planning June 22, 2007
Review of Audit Plan with the City duly 10, 2007 |
Test of Controls August 31, 2007
Fieldwork (1) November 3, 2007
Review of first draft of the CAFR (2) November 13, 2007
Review of final draft of the CAFR (3) November 23, 2007
Issue Audit Opinion Upon approval by Legislative and Finance
Committee.
Single Audit Reports Timing to be discussed with and agreed upon by
Management Letter the City
Audit Committee Communication Letter
(1) Dependent upon fund trial balances and supporting schedules being completed by the City by August 31, 2007 and all
government-wide adjustments being completed by October 22, 2007
(2) Dependent upon complete first draft of the CAFR submitted to Clifton Gunderson by November 5, 2007
(3) Dependent upon Final draft of CAFR submitted to Clifton Gunderson by November 21, 2007
Guiftan con LLP City of Dover 23
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 46
Identification of Anticipated Potential Audit Problems (section B.8)
An area of concern that is commonly encountered during transition to new engagements is the start-up
time required to familiarize ourselves with your operations. Upon appointment as auditors, we will
initiate a planning meeting with the Director of Finance. The purpose of the meeting will be to:
Review the audit approach and roles, and solicit comments and concerns
Schedute work
Establish key meeting and reporting dates
Review the audit requirements
During independent auditors’ first year, management may also be concerned about the potential
disruption of its personnel during the transition period while the new firm becomes familiar with the
City’s operations. We have addressed this concern by structuring our transition process to gain a
thorough understanding of your operations. That process has been successfully applied for numerous
organizations in the past.
Our approach to transition includes:
© Awell-structured, experienced engagement team
¢ More intensive involvement by partners and managers in the transition year
¢ Careful and complete communications at alt levels of the audit team to resolve issues and
concerns
¢ User-friendly audit tools
All transition activities will involve the on-site participation of the audit service team in order to:
¢ Focus our efforts only upon relevant matters
¢ Avoid unnecessary efforts by your personnel
e Make the audit process more responsive
We ask that the City provide access to all records required for the audit and other requirements of the
contract. In addition, we request that a project coordinator be assigned through whom we will
communicate and coordinate activities.
To assist in this process, we will provide a detailed Prepared by Client list early in the engagement. We will
ask that your accounting staff provide us with standard schedules, as well as additional requested
supporting items. We anticipate that your accounting personnel will need to locate and submit to us
certain invoices, vouchers, cancelled checks and other documents and records. We are extremely flexible
as to the format in which we receive this information and will ensure, through use of the latest
technology, that we do not ask you to re-create the wheel.
heres Gunderson Lip City of Dover 24
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 48
Attachment A: License to Practice in the State of Delaware
lifton ;
tunderson LLP City of Dover
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
26
Page 49
LE6z9S ealuvo 1 nOMLWa
"Haoo as deen OL avinwenis Gawd <1aG NOUWONCEY |
PS1Z-8601E GIN INAINOVLL
905 318 Gu OOSHSIG S196
od TT NOSYSONND NOLIO
NowVoo? ssamsng 3SN3IOM SSSNisng ey
9 002 ssGRLVCITVAe BC censevave
12 89218 20 ana
SHOIAUSS TWNOSUAd YO/GNY TYNOISSSI0ud ze
VdO-SHOIAUSS TWNOISSRHCUd wie OLS gaesaere
BYSNYML | ATSNONDISNOD.LSOd
TetaeP atc RN BAINSAZY 40 NOISIAG me SPPOLLOO0S on asnaon
Qniva BUVMV IEG 4O BLYLS :
Clifton
27
City of Dover
Al Gunderson LLP
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 50
Attachment B: Peer Review Report
SPOKANE uiney .
COLVAN, RNG ey
GRANDVIEW WALLA WALLA
MOSUSLAKE WENATCHIE
OMAK ‘YAKIMA
ouhia :
ew Commitice
Wing and auditing practices of ,
ms in effect for the year cnded
plicable to SHC issuers was not
ght Boardt (PCAOB) is
sand auditing practice in
ontrol encompasses the firm's
ACCOUNTING
AND
CONSUI-TING
SERVICES
‘To the Partners of
Clifton Gunderson LLP
andl the Center for Public Company Audit Firms Peer Revi
We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accour
Clifton Gunderson LLP (the fim) applicable to non-SEC issu
July 31, 2004. The firm’s accounting and auditing practice ap
reviewed by us since the Public Company Accounting Oversiy
responsible for inspecting that portion of the firm’s accounting
accordance with PCAOB requirements, A system of quality ¢
Page 51
ACCOUNTING
AND
CONSULTING
SERVICES
MUMBEROF
MeGLADRKY
NETWORK
SPOKANE Quiney
CONAN “TRLCHES
GRANDVIEW WALLA WALLA
MOSES LAKE: SWENARCHIEL:
OMAK VARIA
OTHELLO.
To the Partners of
Clifton Gunderson LLP
and the Center for Public Company Audit Firms Peer Review Commitece
We have reviewed (he system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of
Clifton Gunderson LLP (the fen) applicable to non-SEC issuers in effect for the year ended
July 31, 2004. The firm’s accounting and auditing practice applicable to SEC issuers was not
reviowed by us since the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) is
responsible for inspecting that portion of the firm’s accounting and auditing practice in
accordance with PCAOB requirements, A system of quality control encompasses the firm's
organizational structure aud the policies adopted ond procedures ostablished to provide it
with reasonable assurance of complying with professional standards. ‘The cloments of quality
control are described in the Statements on Quality Control Standards issued by the American
Tustitute of Certified Public Accountants (the AICPA). The design of the system, and
comptionce with it, are the responsibilities of the firm. Our responsibility is to express an
jon on the design of the system, and the firm’s compliance with that system based on our
review,
‘Our review was conducted in accordance with standards established by the Peer Review
Committee of the Center for Public Company Audit Firms and Inetuded pracedures to plan
and perfonn the reviow hat ure sumnterized in the attached description of the peer review
process, Our ceview would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system of quality
contol or ull instances of lack of compliance wih it since it was based on selective lests,
Because thore are Inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quality control,
departures from the system may occur and not be detected, Also, projection of any
evaluation of a system of quality control to future periods is subject to the risk that the
system of quality control may become inadequate because of chnnges in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Jn. our opinion, the system of quality control for the aceounting snd auditing practice
applicable to the non-SEC issuers of Clifton Gunderson LLP in offect for the year onded
duly 31, 2004, has been designed to mect the requirements of the quality control standards for
an accounting and auditing practice established by the AICPA, and was complied with during.
the year then ended fo provide the firm with reasonable assurance of complying wilh
applicable professional standards,
Lerten fen. PPh tee.
Spokane, Washington
December 14, 2004
Clifton
Gunderson LLP City of Dover
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
29
Page 52
Attachment C: Professional Resumes
A Clifton
Gunderson LLP
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
City of Dover
30
Page 53
J. Michael Stephens, CPA, CFE, CGFM
Engagement Partner-in-Charge
Education
Bachelor of science degree with a major in accounting, Loyola College
Professional Certifications
Certified Public Accountant — Maryland, Delaware (pending)
© Certified Government Financial Manager
* Certified Fraud Examiner
Years of Experience
Governmental auditing and accounting with an emphasis on federal and Local : .
agencies.
- Auditing services under contract with the Administrative Office of the U.S.
Courts including audits of federal, district, and bankruptcy courts, and
bankruptcy trustees
— Single audits of local government entities and nonprofits
~~ Public housing authorities
— Counties
— Public school systems
— Libraries
— CFO Act audits for the Office of Thrift Supervision, Financial Management
Service, Food and Drug Administration, Public Health Service, and National
Institutes of Health
— Auditing services under contract with the IG of the FDIC, RTC, U.S. Agency
for International Development, and the Library of Congress
~ Asset valuation reviews for the FDIC and RTC
Serve as partner responsible for numerous family-owned and closely held .
businesses. Services provided include audits, reviews, corporate taxes, and
business consulting.
Serve as nartner of various toes of nonprofit enaaaements includina audits of .
Page 54
¢ Governmental auditing and accounting with an emphasis on federal and local
agencies.
- Auditing services under contract with the Administrative Office of the U.S.
Courts including audits of federal, district, and bankruptcy courts, and
bankruptcy trustees
— Single audits of local government entities and nonprofits
~~ Public housing authorities
— Counties
~ Public school systems
— Libraries
~ CFO Act audits for the Office of Thrift Supervision, Financial Management
Service, Food and Drug Administration, Public Health Service, and National
Institutes of Health
~ Auditing services under contract with the 1G of the FDIC, RTC, U.S. Agency
for International Development, and the Library of Congress
- Asset valuation reviews for the FDIC and RTC
* Serve as partner responsible for numerous family-owned and closely held
businesses. Services provided include audits, reviews, corporate taxes, and
business consulting.
* Serve as partner of various types of nonprofit engagements including audits of
ial private schools, community housing entities, and trusts.
* Consulting to Maryland public housing authorities.
Presentations & Speeches
* “Developing and Implementing Effective Internal Controls,” sponsored by
Clifton Gunderson and Lorman Educational Services, December 2004
« “Fraud: Is Your Nonprofit Organization At Risk?,” Maryland Association of
Nonprofit Organizations, Silver Spring, MD, September 24, 2002
+ “Fraud: Is Your Nonprofit Organization At Risk?,” Maryland Association of
Community Services, Calverton, MD, June 26, 2002 .
Articles & Media Appearances
Lf « “Fraud Prevention Techniques for Businesses," Maryland Public Television,
“Business Connection,” Baltimore, MD, May 8, 2003
* “College Students and Credit Cards,” WIZ-TV, Baltimore, MD, August 17, 2002
« “Fraud Prevention Techniques for Businesses,” CNN Headline News Channel,
“Business Beat,” Baltimore, MD, May 15, 2002
Al Clifton
Gunderson Lip City of Dover 32
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 55
Results Obtained for Clients
« Assisted in detecting fraud and calculating fraud damages for various clients
including the U.S. Courts, financial institutions and nonprofits, and consulted
with U.S. Attorney's Office and FBI personnel to assist in prosecution.
* Performed agreed-upon procedures engagements on contracts entered into by
governmentalagencies. Engagements uncovered substantial sums to be recovered.
Assisted in training client personnel to prepare government required reports.
e Assisted clients in various audit related functions including review of internal
controls, operational audits, and systems reviews, resulting in reduction of
operating costs.
¢ Assisted an undercapitalized savings institution in developing and monitoring
a Capital Compliance Plan for the Office of Thrift Supervision.
© Performed construction contract reviews for developers and purchasers, which
provided a basis for a reduction in construction cost.
Professional Affiliations
« American Institute of Certified Public Accountants - member
Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants - member
* Association of Government Accountants - member
* Association of Certified Fraud Examiners - member
Civic & Social Affiliations
Salvation Army - Advisory Board Member
© Camp Chapel United Methodist Church - finance committee chairman;
development committee treasurer
© Kennedy Krieger Institute
Clifton ;
Gunderson LLP City of Dover 33
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 56
u) Keith E, Novak, CPA
Unassociated Audit Review Partner
Education
Bachelor of science degree with a major in accounting, University of Maryland
Professional Certifications
arious audit related functions including review of
perational audits, and systems reviews, resulting in
ing costs.
tts in preparing and reviewing Official Statements in
nd issues.
‘das an expert witness on accounting matters in Federal
with a discrimination claim against a city.
tganizational structure and tax planning ideas.
sssociation of School Business Officers, November 2006
Standards Update,” Maryland Association of CPAs Annual
sovernment Conference, April 2006
” Maryland Government Finance Officers Association,
avenport Group LLC presentation, September 2006
te,” Maryland Association of Certified Public
2006
ryland Association of Community College Business
Maryland Association of Community Colleges,” July 2004
1g You Wanted to Know,” Maryland Government Finance
1, May 2004
tyland Association of Community College Business
Presentations
Assisted clients in v
internal controls, o
reduction of operat
Assisted governmet
connection with bo
Successfully testific
court in connection
Aided clients with c
“GASB 45 Oh No!” é
“Government Audit
Not-for-Profit and (
“The Cost of Fraud,’
January 2006
“GASB 43 vs. 45," C
“Yellow Book Upda
Accountants, April
“GASB Update,” Ma
Officers, June 2005
“Internal Control,”
“GASB 40: Everythi!
Officers Associatior
“GASB Update,” Ma
Page 57
Presentations
Professional Affiliations
e
.
Lifton
Assisted clients in various audit related functions including review of
internal controls, operational audits, and systems reviews, resulting in
reduction of operating costs.
Assisted governments in preparing and reviewing Official Statements in
connection with bond issues.
Successfully testified as an expert witness on accounting matters in Federal
court in connection with a discrimination claim against a city.
Aided clients with organizational structure and tax planning ideas.
“GASB 45 Oh No!” Association of School Business Officers, November 2006
“Government Audit Standards Update,” Maryland Association of CPAs Annual
Not-for-Profit and Government Conference, April 2006
“The Cost of Fraud,” Maryland Government Finance Officers Association,
January 2006
“GASB 43 vs. 45,” Davenport Group LLC presentation, September 2006
“Yellow Book Update,” Maryland Association of Certified Public
Accountants, April 2006
“GASB Update,” Maryland Association of Community College Business
Officers, June 2005
“Internal Control,” Maryland Association of Community Colleges,“ July 2004
“GASB 40: Everything You Wanted to Know,” Maryland Government Finance
Officers Association, May 2004
“GASB Update,” Maryland Association of Community College Business
Officers Association, November 2003
“Sarbanes-Oxley Where Do We Go From Here?,” Maryland Association of
Community College Business Officers Association, February 2003
“Intermediate Government Accounting,” Maryland Government Finance
Officers Association, annually since 1998
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants - member
Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants - member
Maryland Government Finance Officers Association - member and board
member
underson LLP City of Dover 35
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 58
¢ Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada -
member
: Civic & Social Affiliations
¢ SARC of Harford County - board member
* Student Sharing Coalition - board member and treasurer
os e Baltimore City Rotary - member
* Baltimore City Rotary Foundation - board member and.treasurer
Clifton
Gunderson LLP City of Dover 36
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 59
1 Lori Stoughton, CPA, CICA
Senior Audit Manager
Education
e Assists clients in various audit related functions including review of internal
controls, operational audits, and systems reviews, resulting in reduction of
operating costs.
© Past Adjunct Faculty for Widener University, School of Management
Presentations & Speeches
* Speaker, Association of Government Accountants, Dover Chapter
© Speaker, State Treasurer Municipal Luncheon GASB 43 and 45
® Speaker, Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants State and
Local Industry Conference
¢ Speaker, Government Finance Officers of Pennsylvania State Conference
© Speaker, Pennsylvania County Commissioners Conference
Professional Affiliations
« American Institute of Certified Public Accountants - member
¢ Association of Government Accountants, Dover Chapter - member
¢ National State Auditors Association, Single Audit Committee - past member
o) ¢ National State Auditors Association, Financial Reporting Committee ~ past
member
¢ Government Finance Officers Association - member
Page 60
¢ Assists clients in various audit related functions including review of internal
controls, operational audits, and systems reviews, resulting in reduction of
operating costs.
* Past Adjunct Faculty for Widener University, School of Management
Presentations & Speeches
« Speaker, Association of Government Accountants, Dover Chapter
¢ Speaker, State Treasurer Municipal Luncheon GASB 43 and 45
* Speaker, Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants State and
Local Industry Conference
e Speaker, Government Finance Officers of Pennsylvania State Conference
© Speaker, Pennsylvania County Commissioners Conference
Professional Affiliations
¢ American Institute of Certified Public Accountants - member
* Association of Government Accountants, Dover Chapter - member
¢ National State Auditors Association, Single Audit Committee — past member
© National State Auditors Association, Financial Reporting Committee - past
member
* Government Finance Officers Association - member
lifton .
runderson LLP City of Dover 38
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 61
Charles Kelly
Audit Manager
Education
.
Years of Experience
Master degree in accounting, Virginia Polytechnic Institute
Bachelor of science degree with a double major in accounting and financa,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute
4 years
Areas of Specialization
°
°
Relevant Experience
Audit and accounting for governmental entities
Single audits in accordance with OMB Circular A-133
Audit and accounting services for financial institutions
Performs audits of various governmental entities, including Delaware County
Community College, Howard Community College, and the State of South
Carolina
Performs audits in accordance with OMB Circular A-133
Prepares individual income tax returns
Prepares corporate and other business tax returns
Civic & Social Affiliations
Virginia Polytechnic Institute Alumni Association
Cli
Gunderson LLP City of Dover 39
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 62
Michael A. DaGrossa, CISSP, CCE, CHE, ACE, ITIL
Information Technology Resource
Education
ecovery planning for Personal Lines Data Center.
Disaster Recovery tests. Served as point of contact
*y Group to enable review and understanding of
compliance with all corporate IT Risk Management
iptiance with all IT Control policies, which resulted
n cyber related incidents.
all telecom related hardware and support meets
op remediation plans to mitigate risks so as to not
ructure,
sand tools to aid in investigations. Trained IT Risk
per evidence handling techniques as well as
2 various models for conducting investigations.
regarding background checks, corporate approved
id the detection of rogue systems in the
in order to proactively monitor vendor activity and
g business leads regarding the proper process.
ad security infrastructure including comprehensive
ytion, network and host based intrusion detection
data transfer methods, secure VPN, third party
physical security.
‘ide disaster recovery plan.
<ed activities for HIPAA compliance. This included
ns, maintenance and installation of Windows
j and installation of firewalls, IDS (Intrusion
ty audits, Internet security routers, switches,
a natuarl and earuave far cacuvitu ith arimars
Responsible for disaster r
Successfully conducted 9
for the Business Continui
current SLA’s.
Responsible for enforcing
policies. Have driven con
in measurable decreases /
Responsible for ensuring
AIG compliance and deve
impact Call Center infrast
Introduced new processe:
Management team on pro
educating the team on th
Strictly enforced policies
software and hardware ar
environment.
Worked with other teams
have assisted in educatin
Designed and implement:
security policy documenti
systems, firewalls, secure
partner connections, and
Implemented corporate »
Developed plans and trac
implementing EDI solutio
workstations, configurinc
Detection System), securi
carvare and hardanina thi
Page 63
Clifton
Responsible for disaster recovery planning for Personal Lines Data Center.
Successfully conducted 9 Disaster Recovery tests. Served as point of contact
for the Business Continuity Group to enable review and understanding of
current SLA’s.
Responsible for enforcing compliance with all corporate IT Risk Management
policies. Have driven compliance with alt IT Control policies, which resulted
in measurable decreases in cyber related incidents.
Responsible tor ensuring all telecom related hardware and support meets
AIG compliance and develop remediation plans to mitigate risks so as to not
impact Call Center infrastructure.
Introduced new processes and tools to aid in investigations. Trained IT Risk
Management team on proper evidence handling techniques as well as
educating the team on the various models for conducting investigations.
Strictly enforced policies regarding background checks, corporate approved
software and hardware and the detection of rogue systems in the
environment.
Worked with other teams in order to proactively monitor vendor activity and
have assisted in educating business leads regarding the proper process.
Designed and implemented security infrastructure including comprehensive
security policy documentation, network and host based intrusion detection
systems, firewalls, secure data transfer methods, secure VPN, third party
partner connections, and physical security.
Implemented corporate wide disaster recovery plan.
Developed plans and tracked activities for HIPAA compliance. This included
implementing EDI solutions, maintenance and installation of Windows
workstations, configuring and installation of firewalls, IDS (Intrusion
Detection System), security audits, Internet security routers, switches,
servers and hardening the network and servers for security with primary
focus on HIPAA.
Developed Security Offering: Responsible for developing business strategies
utilizing methodology and tools to analyze and assess customer security
strengths and vulnerabilities. Assisted in the development of security
policies.
Managed Service Offering: Assisted in the development of an operations
management and systems monitoring application based on third party tools
with a custom interface,
Developed an Information based security offering. Responsible for meeting
with vendors, developing relationships, verifying strategic products and
educating the engineers. Implementation and design of solutions.
Gunderson LLP City of Dover 41
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 64
¢ Citrix and Microsoft solutions requiring design and implementation
Professional Affiliations
* AIG Global Security Steering Committee - member
¢ AIG Global TRC, Technical Review Committee - member
© Board of Directors Infragard - program director
© ASIS - member
Clifton
Gunderson Lip City of Dover 42
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Page 65
APPENDIX C
PROPOSER WARRANTIES
A. The proposer certifies it can and will provide and make available, as a minimum, all services
set forth in Section II, Nature of Services Required.
B, Proposer watrants that itis willing and able to comply with State of Delaware laws with
respect to foreign (non-state of Delaware) corporations.
Cc Proposer warrants that it is willing and able to obtain an etrors and omissions insurance
policy providing a prudent amount of coverage for the willful or negligent acts, or omissions
of any officers, employees or agents thereof.
D. Proposer warrants that it will not delegate or subcontract its responsibilities under an
agreement without the prior written permission of the City of Dover.
E. Proposer warrants that all information provided by it in connection with this proposal is true
and accurate.
Signature of Offi A PAK. eT
Name (typed): J. Mieffael Stephens
Title: Partner
Firm: Clifton Gunderson LLP
Date:_ April 10, 2007
25