Skip to main content
AskDover

Attachment

Committee Minutes. Aug 26, 2003.

Open the PDF

This text was pulled from the PDF automatically and may contain mistakes. The PDF is the official record, so check it before relying on this.

1 page has little or no readable text here, often scans or drawings. See the PDF for those.

Page 1

ATTACHMENT #1 Electric Rate Study Rate Design Presentation City of Dover August 26, 2003 . . Burns Brian Farber - Project Manager McDonnell SINCE 1698 Final Step of Electric Rate Study Rate Design Study Detailed Cost- of-Service Study Comprehensive Revenue Requirements Study Information and Tools

Page 2

Presentation Outline ¢ Recap of Cost-of-Service Results * Review of Rate Design Considerations ¢ Overview of Rate Design Model Presentation of Proposed Rates by Rate Schedule Classification FY2004 Revenue Requirement Dollars in Millions Purchased Power Cost $35.2 63.8% Operations Expense 10.5 19.0% Depreciation Expense 3.9 7.1% Cost of Debt 1.4 2.5% Operating Transfers 4.8 8.7% Street Lighting Contribution 0.5 0.9% Net Margins 1.3 2.4% Other Revenue -2.4 4.3% Total $55.2. 100.0%

Page 3

Summary - Unbundled Revenue Requirement Dollars in Millions Demand $14.3 26.0% Energy 28.0 50.8% Transmission 4.5 8.2% Distribution 4.6 8.4% Customer 3.7 6.7% Total $55.2 100.0% Cost of Service Analysis Summary Results .00 7 ‘Current Rate Revenues vs. Allocated Revenue GicentkWh current rates convkWh rev rqmt fT |

Page 4

Divergent Rate Design Objectives Retail Electric Rate Design Promoye DNevenue Syeihy Factors Affecting Rate Design * Cost-of-Service Analysis Results ¢ Specific Objectives of City ¢ Competition With Other Energy Sources e Revenue Stability ¢ Price Stability * Ease of Administration

Page 5

Decisions on Revenue Changes ¢ Which Rate Schedules - —are to be increased and by how much? —are to be decreased and by how much? —are not to be changed? * How is City to be Made Whole? ¢ What Specific Criteria are to be Considered? Rate Design Model Rate Schedules Monthly Billing Histo ¢ Current ¢ kWh Energy ¢ Proposed * kW Demand ¢ Competition e Revenue

Page 6

Rate Design Model Considers Various Types of Charges * Cents per kWh Energy Dollars per kW Demand Demand Ratchet Customer Charge Minimum Bill Power Cost Adjustment Factor Major Rate Components * Energy Rate ¢ Sum of Variable Costs of Service ¢ Demand Rate e Sum of Power Supply Demand and Non-Customer- Related Fixed System Costs ¢ Customer Charge «© Sum of Customer Related Fixed System Costs

Page 7

Proposed Rate Classifications Residential Small Commercial Medium Commercial Large Commercial Primary Metering Street Lighting ¢ Security Lighting Large Customers With Separate Rates Dover Air Force Base Kraft Proctor & Gamble Tilcon Delaware First State Power Mgmt

Page 8

Comparison of Revenue Requirement and Revenue From Current Rates Revenue Current Rate Class Requirement Rates Variance Percent Residential $16,610 $16,291 $319 Small Commercial 2,343 2,646 (304) Medium Commercial : 14,340 (862) Large Commercial 1,037 14 Primary 9,941 878 Street Lighting 59 (23) Security Lighting 629 23 Other 10,207 (45) Total $55,150 $55,150 ($0) Residential Rate Rate Current Proposed Schedule Rate Rate Customer Charge $4.00 $5.00 Energy Charge $0.0880 Summer $0.0924 Winter First 1,000 kWh $0.0880 Over 1,000 kWh $0.0808

Page 9

Residential Rate Comparison Average Monthly Bill per kWh Existing Proposed Mitford Newark Smyma Rate Schedule Small Commercial Rate Rate Current Proposed Schedule Rate Rate Customer Charge $5.00 $10.00 Energy Charge Summer $0.1014 $0.0880 Winter $0.0914 $0.0820

Page 10

Small Commercial Rate Comparison Average Monthly Bill per kWh Existing Proposed Mitford Newark Rate Schedute Medium Commercial Rate Rate Current Schedule __ Rate Customer Charge $5.00 Without Metered Demand Energy Charge Summer $0.0521 Winter $0.0460 With Metered Demand Demand Charge Summer $10.75 Winter $7.80 Energy Charge Summer $0.0521 Winter $0.0460 Proposed Rate $10.00 $0.0880 $0.0820 $12.00 $10.00 $0.0470 $0.0380

Page 11

Medium Commercial Rate Comparison Average Monthly Bill per kWh = - Existing Proposed Milford Newark Rate Schedule Large Commercial Rate Rate Current Proposed Schedule Rate Rate Customer Charge $5.00 $10.00 Demand Charge Summer $8.75 $12.00 Winter $6.80 $10.00 Energy Charge $0.0450 Summer $0.0430 Winter $0.0380

Page 12

Large Commercial Rate Comparison Average Monthly Bill per kWh SSSESTESE Existing Proposed Milford Newark Rate Schedule Primary Metering Rate Rate Current Proposed Schedule Rate Rate Customer Charge $10.00 Demand Charge Summer $8.00 $12.00 Winter $5.30 $10.00 Energy Charge $0.0450 Summer $0.0400 Winter $0.0380

Page 13

Il per kWh Average Monthly B jo fo] 2 = © a £ fe) O @ — © 8 a fo2] c = 2 oO = > = © £ ih o Rate Schedule G Existing ™@ Proposed Newark Conectiv z Rea KNW} \G wyvv”vy' © Average Rate Comparison Primary Metering Small Commercial Medium Commercial Large Commercial Residential Rate Schedule 13

Page 14

Street Lighting Rate Rate Current Proposed Schedule Rate Rate Customer Charge $10.00 Energy Charge $0.0808 $0.0570 Comparison of Projected Revenue From Proposed Rates and Current Rates Rate Class Residential Proposed Current Rates Rates Variance $16,443 $16,291 $152 Small Commercial 2,646 (173) Medium Commercial 14,340 (372) Large Commercial 1,037 14 Primary 9,941 393 Street Lighting 59 (14) Security Lighting 629 ie) Other Total 10,207 10,207 (¢) $55,150 $55,150 $0 Percent 6.5% “2.6% 1.3% 4.0% -24.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14

Page 15

Other Proposed Rate Provisions ¢ No Changes in Separate Rate Schedules for Security Lighting and Large Customers ¢ Change Threshold between Small and Medium Commercial Rate Schedules From an Energy Basis to a Demand Basis ¢ Change Demand Ratchet on Medium and Large Commercial and Primary Metering Rate Schedules from 60% to 100% e Change Power Factor Requirement From 90% to 95% Purchased Power Cost Adjustment ¢ Additional Charge Above Rate Schedules * Provides Recovery of Contractual Increases in Power Costs * Calculated Annually * Current Methodology Provides Partial Recovery ¢ New Methodology Provides Full Recovery * Includes True-up of Past Year Cost Recovery

Page 16

Project Report Covers All Phases Discussion and Questions

Back to this meeting