This text was pulled from the PDF automatically and may contain mistakes. The PDF is the official record, so check it before relying on this.
Page 1
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 20, 2024
The Meeting of the City of Dover Planning Commission was held on Monday, May 20, 2024 at
7:00 PM as an In-Person Meeting and also using the phone/videoconferencing system WebEx.
The Meeting Session was conducted with Chair Mrs. Maucher presiding. Members present were
Mr. Cooper, Mr. Roach (virtual), Mr. Witham, Mrs. Denney, Mr. Baldwin, Mrs. Welsh, and Mrs.
Maucher. Dr. Jones and Mr. Reaves were absent.
Staff members present were Mrs. Dawn Melson-Williams, Ms. Katherine Oehmke, Mr. Jason
Lyon (virtual), and Mrs. Kristen Mullaney.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mrs. Maucher stated that application C-24-01 Tower-Based Wireless Communications Facility
at 640 Lafferty Lane (Rise Up Towers, LLC) will not be heard tonight due to incomplete public
notice.
Mrs. Welsh moved to approve the Agenda as submitted, seconded by Mr. Witham and the motion
was carried 7-0 with Dr. Jones and Mr. Reaves absent.
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 15, 2024
Mrs. Welsh moved to approve the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 15, 2024,
seconded by Mr. Baldwin and the motion was carried 7-0 with Dr. Jones and Mr. Reaves absent.
COMMUNICATIONS & REPORTS
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that the next Planning Commission regular meeting is scheduled
for Monday, June 17, 2024 at 7:00PM in the City Hall Council Chambers.
Mrs. Melson-Williams provided an update on the regular City Council and various Committee
meetings held on April 22 & 23, 2024 and May 13 & 14, 2024.
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that she wanted to share for the benefit of the public that there is an
announcement that the City’s Customer Service Building located at 5 East Reed Street is going
to be closed as repairs are made to the HVAC system. That starts on Wednesday, May 22, 2024
and they are hoping the building will reopen to customers on June 10, 2024. There are other
ways to still make payments on your utilities bills. Those include the drive through at that
location which will remain open, the payment drop box, and of course there is an online
opportunity as well. For more information visit the City’s website at www.cityofdover.com for
any utility billing questions that you may have.
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that the Downtown Dover Pathways Study last week had a design
charrette known at the Loockerman Street Design Charrette. It was Monday through Wednesday
of last week with a series of collaborative meetings, activities, discussions, and Open House
events held here focused on the portion of Loockerman Street between South State Street and the
split where it becomes Forest Street near the railroad tracks. There is an upcoming public utility
1
Page 2
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
project where water lines and sewer lines will be replaced, hence causing disturbance in the
roadway. This was an opportunity to gather design input for how that roadway and the associated
sidewalks, etc. go back. They gathered information and that Study will have a final report that
comes out this summer and hopefully lends some information to how that project will progress.
Our website on the Meeting Agenda includes the link for the Downtown Dover Pathways Project
website. It is one of the projects of the Dover/Kent County MPO.
OPENING REMARKS CONCERNING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
Mrs. Melson-Williams presented the audience information on policies and procedures for the In-
Person Meeting and Virtual Meeting using the WebEx system.
OLD BUSINESS
Requests for Extensions of Planning Commission Approval:
S-22-09 Dover Apartments at Leipsic Road (The Edge) – Request for One-Year Extension of the
Planning Commission conditional approval of June 21, 2022, for a Site Development
Application for the construction of six (6) 3-story, 46,800 GSF garden style apartment buildings
each containing thirty-six (36) units for a total of 216 apartment units. Also proposed are eleven
(11) garage buildings, a Clubhouse with Pool, Recreation Facilities, parking, and other site
improvements. The approval included a waiver to reduce the parking requirement and the Active
Recreation Area Plan with Partial Fee-in-lieu of Active Recreation Area Construction. The
property is zoned SC-2 (Community Shopping Center Development Zone) and partially subject
to the SWPOZ (Source Water Protection Overlay Zone) Tier 3: Excellent Recharge Area. The
property is located on the southeast side of Leipsic Road east of North DuPont Highway. The
owner of record is currently Metropolitan 8, LLC. Property is currently unaddressed. Tax Parcel:
ED-05-068.05-01-15.01-000. Council District 3.
Representative: Mr. James Taylor, Verdantas (virtual); Mr. Sam Guarnier, Verdantas
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that the first application is S-22-09 Dover Apartments at Leipsic
Road (The Edge). Planning Commission originally saw this application back in June 2022. It is a
proposal for a series of six apartment buildings, some associated garage buildings to serve that, a
pool, a clubhouse and other recreation facilities on the site located on the south side of Leipsic
Road just to the east of DuPont Highway. It was a total of 216 apartment units. The project has
been moving through the review process to achieve agency approvals and they do have several
of them in hand including DelDOT, the Fire Marshal’s Office, and the Kent Conservation
District. The Planning Office actually received today their Final Plan submission of the Record
Plan and Site Plans; so, their Final Plan approval is imminent. They have filed a Site Work
Permit for the site and they anticipate a Building Permit Application to follow suit soon. Today,
they are seeking a one-year extension because with an action by Planning Commission in June
2022, they are coming up on their two-year initial approval. The Planning Commission has the
ability to grant an additional one-year extension. She does see the project engineer Mr. James
Taylor has joined us online.
2
Page 3
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
Mr. Taylor stated that he wanted to apologize for not being able to be there in person this
evening. Mrs. Melson-Williams did a great job at summarizing where we are at in the process
which is basically at the end of the approvals. The plans are ready to be submitted for the
Building Permits once the Planning Staff has approved the Final Plan.
Mrs. Denney moved to approve S-22-09 Dover Apartments at Leipsic Road (The Edge) for a
one-year extension as it appears that they have been doing due diligence but as we know,
sometimes these things take a little longer than necessary, seconded by Mrs. Welsh and the
motion was carried 7-0 by voice vote with Dr. Jones and Mr. Reaves absent.
SB-23-03 Revised Stonebrook East Planned Neighborhood Design at McKee Road and W.
Denneys Road - Request for a Extension of the Planning Commission conditional approval
granted December 18, 2023 for the Revised Subdivision Plan to increase the number of
townhouses from 87 to 103 townhouses (increase of 16 townhouse units) and to decrease the
number of garden apartment units from 168 to 138 garden apartment units (decrease of 30 units).
This development known as Stonebrook East Planned Neighborhood Design (PND) proposes
241 dwelling units, recreational areas, open space, and stormwater management areas. The
conditional approval included PND- Alternative Design Standards. The property is zoned RM-1
(Medium Density Residential Zone) and approved as a PND (Planned Neighborhood Design
Option). The site is on the northeast corner of McKee Road and W. Denneys Road. Property
Address: intersection of McKee Road and West Denneys Road. Property Owners: Hanae
Harmony Properties and Stonebrook East 168 LLC. Tax Parcels: ED-05-057.03-01-01.00-000 to
ED-05-057.03-01-92.00-000. Council District 1.
Representative: Mr. Sam Guarnier, Verdantas; Mr. James Taylor, Verdantas (virtual)
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that this is a Request for Extension. There is a slightly different
timeframe with this one. This application was a combination of a Conditional Use Site Plan
Subdivision Application associated with Stonebrook East Planned Neighborhood Design on
West Denneys Road just east of McKee Road; kind of at that northeast corner. It was a project
that consists of a mix of townhouse units as well as apartment buildings for a total of 103
townhouses and 138 apartment units. With a Subdivision, they are actually only given six
months to be moving forward. Again, with this project they have been working on plan
submissions that they will be making in the near future to the regulatory agencies to satisfy those
requirements. The Planning Commission did review this application back in December 2023 and
six months have sped by since Christmas time. They are here tonight seeking a Request for
Extension. Again, we have Mr. James Taylor from Verdantas that has joined us online as well as
his colleague Mr. Sam Guarnier who is here this evening in person.
Mr. Guarnier stated that they have been working through some stormwater issues that have come
up on the site. They had to do some additional testing and they are working through finalizing
those plans looking to submit in the near future.
Mrs. Denney stated that we all know that Kent Conservation is inundated and it takes a little
longer. Is that the main hold up? Responding to Mrs. Denney, Mr. Guarnier stated yes, they had
to do some testing so it kind of pushed things back a little bit. That was the main hold up and we
3
Page 4
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
are getting ready to submit to them now. Everything else is more or less ready to submit.
Mr. Taylor stated that six months for a Subdivision approval is a very short timeframe to go
through to get the approvals from DelDOT. With this, we are trying to work through the aspects
related to getting the stormwater design to meet the regulations and like Mr. Guarnier said,
additional testing was required and that design is done at this point that they will be able to
submit in the near future.
Mrs. Welsh moved to approve SB-23-03 Revised Stonebrook East Planned Neighborhood Design
at McKee Road and W. Denneys Road for a one year extension, seconded by Mr. Witham and the
motion was carried 7-0 by voice vote with Dr. Jones and Mr. Reaves absent.
NEW APPLICATIONS
Z-24-05 Lands of Chiang & Sons Properties, LLC at 1241 College Park Drive: Rezoning C-PO
to IO - Public Hearing and Review for Recommendation to City Council of a Rezoning
application for a parcel of land consisting of 1.1024 acres +/-. The property is zoned C-PO
(Commercial and Professional Office Zone). The proposed zoning for the property is IO
(Institutional and Office Zone). The property is located on the east side of College Park Drive (a
private street) and north of State College Road. The owner of record is Chiang & Sons
Properties, LLC. Property Address: 1241 College Park Drive. Tax Parcel: ED-05-067.00-02-
12.08-000. Council District 4. Ordinance #2024-11. The First Reading of the Proposed
Ordinance was held on April 22, 2024 and Public Hearings scheduled for Planning Commission
on May 20, 2024 and City Council on June 10, 2024.
Representative: Mr. Nik Patel, Avi Consulting Group
Ms. Oehmke stated that the Rezoning for Mr. Chiang & Sons Properties, LLC at 1241 College
Park Drive is located on the east side of College Park Drive. It’s a private street north of State
College Road. It’s just over one acre. It is currently an office building. It is zoned C-PO
(Commercial and Professional Office Zone). This property has a little bit of history. There was a
storm that came through Dover and condemned the building. The property was purchased by
Chiang & Sons Properties, LLC in July 2022. In September 2022, they did try to put through a
Conditional Use Application that was heard by the Planning Commission. It was denied and in
January 2023, a Building Permit was approved for renovations. They speedily finished their
renovations and received their Certificate of Occupancy by December 2023. The screen shows a
rendering of what the building currently looks like. They did a lovely job fixing that up. This is
the Site Plan of the property with its parking and landscaping. The use comparison between the
C-PO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) and the IO (Institutional and Office Zone) as
you can see on the screen, gives them quite a few more opportunities for tenants to use the space
within the building, including as places of public assembly and child care centers. For this
property, according to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Category is Office and Office Parks.
This allows for mainly day time use and it’s tucked into a little office park as you can see here. If
there are any questions, we have Mr. Nik Patel, the real estate agent for the client here.
Mr. Patel stated that he is representing the client and the description from Ms. Oehmke was
4
Page 5
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
pretty thorough. Currently, the property is still vacant. It is for sale and lease; they just haven’t
had any activity. A lot of the requests that they are getting are for uses that are under IO
(Institutional and Office Zone) and not the C-PO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone).
They felt like this would be a good opportunity to get the building back up and running and
hopefully marketable for lease or for sale.
Mrs. Maucher opened the public hearing and after seeing no one wishing to speak, closed the
public hearing.
Mrs. Denney stated that she wants to note that within this there is an elimination for street
frontage sidewalk as well as the upright curbing and with the change of zoning. Responding to
Mrs. Denney, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that she thinks that Mrs. Denney is mixing up
applications; this is a Rezoning application.
Mr. Witham stated that Staff does make a recommendation to the Commission that the proposed
zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He should have asked this question to the
applicant earlier, but he was wondering how long this matter has been on the market for the
existing businesses under the current zoning? Responding to Mr. Witham, Mr. Patel stated that
it’s actually been on the market since prior to our completion of our Certificate of Occupancy.
So, it’s been over eight months.
Mr. Witham asked if there were any takers yet. Responding to Mr. Witham, Mr. Patel stated no.
Mrs. Welsh moved to recommend approval to City Council for application Z-24-05 Lands of
Chiang & Sons Properties, LLC at 1241 College Park Drive: Rezoning C-PO to IO, seconded by
Mr. Witham and the motion was carried 7-0 by roll call vote with Dr. Jones and Mr. Reaves
absent. Mrs. Welsh voting yes; as mentioned in the request for the Rezoning to IO (Institutional
and Office Zone), that provides a better opportunity for the parcel to be turned into a viable
business and to get rid of a vacant building that is just sitting there and that has been destroyed
at one point and now re-accomplished. Mr. Cooper voting yes; for reasons stated. Mr. Roach
voting yes; for reasons stated. They have been cooperative with the Planning Staff and it fits the
Comprehensive Plan. Mrs. Denney voting yes; she thinks after all of the time and not having any
interest in the zoning that exists that the change in zoning may help allow this building to have
useful tenants now. Mr. Witham voting yes; for the reasons set forth by his fellow Commissioners
and also to include the reasons set forth in the Staff recommendation and this Rezoning would be
consist with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Baldwin voting yes; for reasons stated. Mrs. Maucher
voting yes; for reasons stated.
S-24-05 Lands of Ken Barrett Builders for Office Building at 1413 New Burton Road – Public
Hearing and Review of a Site Development Plan Application to permit construction of a one-
story 3,026 SF office building and associated site improvements. The property is zoned C-1A
(Limited Commercial Zone) consisting of 0.41 acres. The property is located on the east side of
New Burton Road, north of Garton Lane. The owner of record is Ken Barrett Builders LLC.
Property Address: 1413 New Burton Road. Tax Parcel: ED-05-085.11-01-01.00-000. Council
District 2. Waiver Requests: Elimination of Upright Curbing and Elimination of Sidewalk.
5
Page 6
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
Representative: Mr. Kevin Minnich, Minnich Engineering
Ms. Oehmke stated that Application S-24-05 is an office building at 1413 New Burton Road. It’s
on the east side of New Burton, north of Webbs Lane. It is 0.41 acres and is zoned C-1A
(Limited Commercial Zone). It is going to be a one story, roughly 3,000 SF office building and
they have requested two waivers: one for the elimination of street frontage sidewalk and one for
an elimination of upright curbing. The rendering on the screen shows what the site looks like
now. It used to be a single family dwelling with a storage accessory structure in the rear. It has a
rather large parking lot already. The next rendering shows the proposed site. They have updated
this graphic. They have updated their parking to twelve spaces rather than the ten spaces. As you
can see, they have already provided for bike parking and dumpster requirements, handicap
parking, and they already have their DelDOT entrance for New Burton Road. As you can see
here, a view down the street shows that there are not currently sidewalks in this area or upright
curbing in either direction. Here are some renderings of what the rear and front of the building
will look like. The next rendering shows the side elevations. They have provided a floor plan for
us that is consistent with an office or a medical office and we have a Landscape Plan. It will have
an opaque barrier fence between the residential properties to the north and then you can see the
landscaping will cover the fence on the side of the office.
Mr. Minnich stated that he is representing the new owner, Mr. Ken Barrett. Mr. Bob Larimore (a
local land surveyor) was the owner of the property for a long time. He feels like he should ask
for a moment of silence since he is no longer with us and he was a good friend. They are trying
to redevelop the site and it’s a challenging site because it’s a small site. It is not a square site; it’s
a triangle so it places limitations on the site. We do have the DelDOT approval for a small
entrance and we do have Kent Conservation District’s approval. They still need to get the
approval from the Public Works Department and anything else that Planning Department
required. As far as the DAC Report, they are all good with that Report. The comments that were
in the DAC Report were minor and we can make any changes that were needed in the DAC
Report. The two main things are what Ms. Oehmke hinted on which was the sidewalk waiver and
the waiver for the curbing. He thinks some of that is tailored because of the type, size, and
configuration of the site.
Mrs. Denney stated that she really feels strongly when we start eliminating sidewalks in already
developed areas such as this. If we require sidewalk, it’s the beginning of what the next one will
have to have and then eventually we will have sidewalks. When you think about other businesses
and things that are there, it’s not a huge piece of property for the sidewalk. She really doesn’t
like to see eliminations of sidewalk. With the curbing requirement, she is retired from managing
an orthopedic surgery group and tripping over curbing blocks creates a whole lot of business.
That is not as important unless it keeps a car from going out into a street or into a building. To
her, that isn’t as great of a situation. She does like to see sidewalks. She thinks they have to start
somewhere with getting the sidewalks in or we will forever be without sidewalks. Especially
now in that area, we have the Recreation Center and things going on and have more pedestrian
traffic.
Mr. Minnich asked if the sidewalk waiver ever been approved by Planning Commission.
Responding to Mr. Minnich, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that the Planning Commission has
6
Page 7
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
considered a number of sidewalk waivers throughout the City. There have been some that have
been granted because of future sidewalk projects that were eminent. There have also been others
where the configuration of the property or its topography limits the ability to install a sidewalk.
Certainly, this property is a strange shape. It is at grade with the adjacent roadway. She believes
that Staff had recommended approval of the request for elimination of the sidewalk noting that
there is actually shoulder in this area and she believes that as part of the DelDOT approval of
their small commercial entrance, they (DelDOT) were not requiring the improvement to include
the sidewalk provisions.
Mr. Minnich stated that he did get a follow up email from DelDOT saying that they forgot to say
that the applicant will need to pay the cash-in-lieu of the sidewalk. He told Mr. Will Mobley at
DelDOT to hold off until they have this meeting tonight because they don’t want to pay that until
they know whether or not they are going to get the Waiver for the sidewalk. They are aware of
that and obviously if they don’t get the Waiver, they will probably install the sidewalk because
DelDOT’s price will probably be a lot more expensive. He just wasn’t sure if the sidewalk
waivers were ever granted. He hasn’t had a lot of luck with that being done; he thinks this is a
candidate for a waiver in his opinion.
Mr. Witham stated that he assumes if this property is in grade level with the roadway, if the
sidewalk was installed it would be a raised sidewalk; therefore, it would be above the roadway.
Is that correct? Responding to Mr. Witham, Mr. Minnich stated probably yes.
Mr. Witham stated that if a person was riding a bicycle and they wanted to use the sidewalk for
the short distance that this property consists, they would have to shift their bike upwards on the
sidewalk which is a hazard in his view.
Mrs. Maucher asked if there was a map showing the other properties because she lives adjacent
to New Burton Road. Isn’t it residential next to it? So, there really is not going to be the
opportunity for extension. Responding to Mrs. Maucher, Mr. Minnich stated that there is
residential to the north of this site.
Mrs. Maucher asked if it was adjacent to residential. Responding to Mrs. Maucher, Mr. Minnich
stated yes, it is adjacent to residential.
Mrs. Maucher stated that she doesn’t like sidewalks to nowhere and putting a small segment in
when there is not going to be an opportunity to connect. How about on the other side the
property? Responding to Mrs. Maucher, Mr. Minnich stated no, on the other side, the person is
renovating the building on the south side. That is already paved parking in that area so there is no
sidewalk per say. There is no sidewalk all the way down to where Delaware State News used to
be. That is all shoulder all the way down. The nearest sidewalk is probably down by Puncheon
Run.
Mr. Cooper stated that he believes to the north it is the apartment complex and there is no access
to the road because there is a fence there. So, he doesn’t think that he has a problem with the
Waiver. He doesn’t see a reason to put it there.
7
Page 8
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
Mrs. Denney stated that also when you put a sidewalk in, it tends to create almost like an
ingress/egress point as opposed to the whole parking lot being ingress/egress across the width of
it. Again, just because the Rec Center, as she comes and goes and she goes to the Rec Center
quite a bit because she also drags her grandkids back and forth from there, there is a little more
pedestrian traffic. Some of them are kids and it just seems to her, that that kind of designates an
ingress/egress as opposed to just back onto New Burton Road. That troubles her, that there is no
ingress/egress and the sidewalk would create that.
Mrs. Maucher opened the public hearing and after seeing no one wishing to speak, closed the
public hearing.
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that there is one individual who joined us online, Elizabeth D. She
doesn’t believe that she wishes to speak but she did note in the chat to the north of this site, there
is no sidewalk that concurs with the statement that Mr. Cooper was making. It is kind of the back
side of that adjacent apartment complex and there is a fence there with no access all the way up
to Kesselring Drive which is the next intersection to the north.
Mrs. Maucher closed the public hearing.
Mr. Cooper moved to approve S-24-05 Lands of Ken Barrett Builders for Office Building at 1413
New Burton Road to include both Waiver Requests for the elimination of upright curbing and the
elimination of sidewalk, seconded by Mrs. Welsh and the motion was carried 7-0 by roll call vote
with Dr. Jones and Mr. Reaves absent. Mr. Cooper voting yes; based on Staff recommendations
and the application as a whole. He thinks that the sidewalk discussion is the first time in his
entire life that he has ever disagreed with Mrs. Denney but he thinks that a sidewalk to nowhere
on that short little block doesn’t do much. Mr. Roach voting yes. Mrs. Denney voting yes;
because she thinks that the zoning change needs to happen there. Unfortunately, she is not
agreeing with the other part but as a whole she does think the zoning should be changed. Mr.
Witham voting yes; for the reasons set forth on the record tonight as well as what is set forth in
Staff recommendations. It appears that while the waiver on the sidewalks is somewhat unique
and may be the first time that we have done this, but it does seem to meet the requirements
according to Article 5, Section 18.5 as well as the requirements for the waiver of the upright
curbing in accordance with Article 6, Subparagraph 3.6B. Mr. Baldwin voting yes. Mrs. Welsh
voting yes; for the reasons previously stated. Mrs. Maucher voting yes; based on DAC comments
and Staff recommendations.
S-24-06 Revised Leander Lakes III Apartments – Public Hearing and Review of a Revision to
the Site Development Plan Application S-23-04 for the construction of eight (8) 3-story garden
style apartment buildings and 1 (one) 2-story 8 unit building for a total of two hundred (200)
units and Active Recreation Areas to be known as Leander Lakes III. The Revised Plan involves
the reconfiguration and relocation of the access drive connection to Forrest Avenue for the
apartment complex. The parcel with the Access Drive is zoned RM-2 (Medium Density
Residence Zone) and partially subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The Apartment
Complex project area (future 25-acre parcel) is zoned RM-2 (Medium Density Residence Zone)
and partially subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) with the balance of this parcel zoned
R-10 (One Family Residence Zone) and partially subject to COZ-1 (Commercial Overlay Zone).
8
Page 9
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
The property is located on the south side of Forrest Avenue west of Dover High Drive. The
owners of record are Leander Lakes IV, LLC (previous owner: Jireh Christian Center) and
Calvary Baptist Church of Dover with equitable owner/developer as Leander Lakes III, LLC.
Property Addresses: 2161 Forrest Avenue and part of 2285 Forrest Avenue. Tax Parcels: ED-05-
075.00-01-05.00-000 and ED-05-075.00-01-06.00-000. Council District 1. Waiver Request:
Elimination of Curbing on Access Drive. This site was granted conditional approval for a 200-
unit apartment complex with Site Plan S-23-04 Leander Lakes III by the Planning Commission
on February 21, 2023. A Minor Subdivision Plan to create the 25-acre parcel for Leander Lakes
III has been approved.
Representative: Mr. LB Steele, Leander Lakes III, LLC; Mr. Jim Eriksen, Solutions IPEM
Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that application is a Site Development Plan. It likely looks familiar
to most because there was a previous application known as S-23-04 that was considered by the
body back in February 2023 for this apartment complex project. The apartment complex is a
series of buildings with a total of 200 units. What is shown on the screen is part of the previous
location. It was part of the property located at 2285 Forrest Avenue where the Calvary Baptist
Church is under construction. This project involved a Minor Subdivision that focused on 25
acres on the eastern portion of that property and it was proposed for development. Now for the
new site area, the subdivision to pull out that 25 acres has actually been completed in recent
weeks but their project has picked up an additional land mass and that is the property located at
2161 Forrest Avenue. Most people may know that as property being in the ownership of Jireh
Christian Church. It was the Destiny Christian Church property and with this additional area they
are looking to revise the site access for this apartment complex known as Leander Lakes III.
Originally, the proposal was to provide a linkage to Forrest Avenue by way of the narrow tract of
land that they owned along the Calvary Church eastern boundary and link into the Calvary
access point that will lead to Forrest Avenue. With this Revision, they are looking to create a
different access road that would travel across the church property moving north and then
interconnecting with what is the existing drive and its existing connection to Forrest Avenue.
There is kind of a meandering path or driveway that exists that goes to that Destiny Christian
Church property. Leander Lakes III is proposed that it would interconnect first off with Leander
Lakes I at two points of Isabelle Isle. That was always in the plan but what is changed is the
connection that travels north and in this case, would link to that Destiny Christian Church drive.
On the Plan itself, they have actually gone through and made a number of the updates to the plan
set that was previously identified back in 2023. There was an Active Recreation Area Plan at that
time that was reviewed for the apartments and makes a series of recreation areas, fitness areas,
game play for corn hole and horseshoes as part of a larger walking trail network for the project
site. To talk a little bit about the apartment complex itself, what you kind of see in the white ring
shown on the screen is the series of parking lot spaces. The buildings are the next inter-ring.
There is a walking trail system that links from the buildings and around their rear. In the center
are two areas that would be part of the stormwater management for the site. The property is bi-
sected by this stream corridor that they are working through the appropriate permits for crossing
of that stream corridor with the drive aisle that will exist for the apartment complex. The
apartment complex is required to have rear emergency access to the buildings and that is
achieved by what they call a “super sidewalk” because it would be a sidewalk area that is to the
rear of the building that is ten (10) feet in width and then has additional four (4) feet of grass
9
Page 10
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
pavers on either side for a total width of eighteen (18) feet that would allow for fire apparatus to
access the rear of these buildings. Something that you hope you never need; but in the meantime,
it will also serve as part of the walking trail system for the project site. The apartment complex is
proposing the adequate number of parking spaces at 450 parking spaces; that meets our Code
requirements. Likewise, their Plan includes lighting and dumpsters. The stream has a buffering
requirement from it because it is identified as wetland areas. They intend to maintain a 50 foot
riparian buffer through that area. Additionally, while there is some woodland removal for the
project, the overall site will have to plant additional tress as part of their development activity
and we are looking at well over 300 trees. The requirement would be 341 and their initial plan is
showing 367 trees. Part of the property is adjacent to Forrest Avenue when you take into account
this access drive. That portion of the property is subject to the Corridor Overlay Zone but most of
those provisions do not come into play other than some tree planting requirements because the
major area of development is not within the Corridor Overlay Zone. As part of the Development
Advisory Committee Report, Planning Staff has granted approval to their Waiver Request that
they have filed associated with this access drive and that is for the partial elimination of upright
curbing along that access drive. That is something that Staff has the ability to grant when it’s tied
to stormwater management practices. We see this access drive as its first rendition and future
development may be forthcoming on the parcel 2161 Forrest Avenue would likely change the
format of that access drive. In updating their plans, the plan is also indicating that they are
planning for EV charging and putting in place, the infrastructure that would allow for at least two
spaces for each building. The variety of comments that follow as part of the Development
Advisory Committee Report are from the regulatory agencies including the Department of
Water/Wastewater related to water services. None of the streets or access drives that they are
proposing would become City streets with this project. They are linking to roads that are State
maintained roads so DelDOT has had some comments and has worked with the applicant in that
regard. They continue to work with the Kent Conservation District related to stormwater
management planning and then the associated permits related to that stream crossing with the
appropriate agency components of DNREC.
Mr. Eriksen stated that as described by City Staff, this application is for 200 multiplex dwellings
as well as a Minor Subdivision for the parcel located at 2285 Forrest Avenue in Dover. This site
may look familiar to some of you as this site has already received preliminary conditional
approval for this exact use in February 2023. As Staff described, they are back today because
they would like to make an adjustment to the access road connecting to Forrest Avenue. The
access road previously interconnected to the Calvary Baptist Church entrance and they are
proposing to relocate that access road such that it utilizes the existing entrance just east of there,
which is in front of the future Leander Lakes IV Project. If you look at this next slide, you see
the previously approved Leander Lakes III Project. At the time of the previous presentation, the
developer owned the existing Leander Lakes parcels and he had a contract in place for this 25
acre piece of land known as Leander Lakes III. He did not own the adjoining parcel just east
along Forrest Avenue which is labeled as “future Leander Lakes IV” on the screen. Upon
development of Leander Lakes III, that parcel would have been surrounded by other Leander
Lakes project; it was the hole in the doughnut. At the time that Leander Lakes III was brought
before the Commission last year, they had limited options for any connection to Forrest Avenue.
Basically, the only option was to provide a connection to Forrest Avenue through Calvary
Baptist Church’s proposed entrance because of that “hole in the doughnut.” Shortly after the
10
Page 11
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
approval of Leander Lakes III, the developer was able to secure the future Leander Lakes IV
parcel. Leander Lakes IV was brought before the Commission for a Rezoning in April 2023 and
the developer has since fully purchased the Leander Lakes IV parcel. Now having a better
picture of the future, the developer has brought Leander Lakes III back to the Commission to
request for the access road to be relocated and connect to the existing entrance in front of the
Leander Lakes IV parcel rather than the future entrance in front of the Calvary Baptist Church.
The developer intends to eventually develop Leander Lakes IV but has anticipated moving
forward with that after Leander Lakes III. The next slide shows the proposed Leander Lakes III
Plan which shows the access road in the future Leander Lakes IV parcel. Due to size and shape
of the Leander Lakes IV parcel, whenever that would be developed, there would likely be a
roadway constructed that would parallel the original Leander Lakes III roadway for
approximately 809 LF. This redundant infrastructure would be very wasteful and therefore is
generally considered a poor land planning practice. It would increase construction costs as well
as maintenance while providing very little benefit. These costs would ultimately result in higher
rents for future tenants of these properties. With that in mind, the decision was made to adjust the
Leander Lakes III Plan to move the access road per the Plan that you see in front of you today.
At the time of that decision, we were diligently pursuing approval of the previous layout of
Leander Lakes III and they were just about to submit their onsite engineering drawings to the
City. They were nearing approval of our DelDOT Plans and had a round of review with Kent
Conservation District. They paused on these processes so that they could make a final
determination on a path forward. They had to meet with DelDOT and the City to verify general
feasibility and discuss anticipated impacts and ensure they had a clear path forward. It took some
time to get all of that actually squared away and figured out, but they are comfortable with their
path forward at this time and all be it. This is a minor revision. It did take some time to figure it
all out.
The next slide shows an updated traffic distribution exhibit for DelDOT. Obviously, there is a
considerable amount of analysis of the DelDOT impacts and DelDOT is in general agreement
with their traffic information and plan. To summarize and simplify, the DelDOT impacts for
Leander Lakes III project revisions, the trips that were previously anticipated to use the Calvary
Baptist Church shared entrance are now anticipated to utilize the entrance in front of the future
Leander Lakes IV project. Beyond that, the overall impacts on the roads are still very similar to
what was previously presented. Leander Lakes III will be subject to the Area Wide Study Fee
meaning that the trip generation is not significant enough to warrant a Traffic Impact Study.
Instead, DelDOT will identify any DelDOT projects in the area and the developer will be
responsible for contributions to those projects based on the site’s share of traffic. This project
would also be responsible for any additional improvements required at the existing Leander
Lakes IV entrance to provide an entrance in compliance with DelDOT regulations. Leander
Lakes III will still have multiple access points and residents will still have the ability to utilize
the traffic light at the Dover High Drive intersection which will allow for better turning
movements as well as limit impacts on Forrest Avenue. There are still interconnections and
shared entrances for Leander Lakes projects; however, this updated design ultimately gives
control of these entrances that are utilized by Leander Lakes entirely to the developer. The
developer does not have to have concerns with impacts in coordination with the Calvary Baptist
Church’s project but will still have the same range of options available to the future residents to
utilize the best option available to enter and exit the site which will allows for a better flow of
11
Page 12
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
traffic and less meaningful impacts on Forrest Avenue. It also allows for a range of options for
emergency service vehicle access in the event of a road closure or another emergency. He
believes that largely covers the actual revisions to the plans. The next slide shows that they are
back at the aerial exhibit. Beyond the access road revision, the rest of the Site Plan is generally in
accordance with the previous design which was presented to the Commission last year. Staff did
a very nice job of explaining that layout and all of the details of it. As noted by Staff, they did
update the Plan to address any kind of conditions or considerations that were requested by the
Commission. They are moving forward with the Plan in front of you. To avoid any more
redundancy, he is not going to go into details on those areas as they were previously approved.
He will just generally state that everything is largely the same from a big picture land planning
standpoint. The site is still in the same proper investment level areas. It complies with the
Comprehensive Plan. It’s a permitted use. There is adequate parking and it provides for
stormwater management and utilities in an identical matter as what was previously presented.
Mrs. Denney stated that ultimately everything is pretty much staying the same with the
additional piece of property, but the ingress/egress to Forrest Avenue is going to have a better
solution than going to Calvary Baptist Church. Responding to Mrs. Denney, Mr. Eriksen stated
that is correct. This is a better plan for the future development of Leander Lakes IV. It avoids
that redundant road. You would have two roads right next to each other like fifty feet apart.
Mrs. Denney asked if this eliminates that and just puts the one complete entrance out to Forrest
Avenue? Responding to Mrs. Denney, Mr. Eriksen stated yes.
Mrs. Welsh asked if the road that they are connecting to on the Revised Plan is an existing road.
Responding to Mrs. Welsh, Mr. Eriksen stated yes, it is existing.
Mrs. Welsh stated that she just wanted to make sure that it wasn’t planned for the Leander Lakes
IIII and it’s not really there yet. Responding to Mrs. Welsh, Mr. Eriksen stated that it’s there.
Mrs. Maucher opened the public hearing.
Mr. Miles Minear – 42 Paradise Lane Dover, DE 19904
Mr. Minear stated that he is a resident within two hundred (200) feet of this project. His question
is that at this point we are going to have two exits and entrance: one being with a traffic light and
the other not having a traffic light. Is that correct? Responding to Mr. Minear, Mrs. Maucher
stated no, she thinks the applicant can clarify.
Mr. Eriksen stated that they have two options off of Dover High Drive. Those two are through
the existing Leander Lakes Apartments that are out there. To utilize that to get off of Forrest
Avenue, you would utilize the traffic light at that intersection as well as the other entrance that
we have a more direct connection to that is the existing entrance to the existing Destiny Christian
Church. They would be making improvements to that entrance with this project.
Mr. Minear asked that as Leander Lakes IV comes into the picture, at that point you are going to
be requesting another ingress/egress? Responding to Mr. Minear, Mr. Eriksen stated that the
intention is to not add another entrance with Leander Lakes IV. There may additional
12
Page 13
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
improvements required with Leander Lakes IIII when you add the additional units.
Mr. Minear stated that at this point, there would only be two spots affected on Forrest Avenue;
the one with the light and the one without. Responding to Mr. Minear, Mr. Eriksen stated yes.
Mr. Steele stated that with the curb cut which is existing and the existing road by Destiny
Christian Church, what they are doing instead of bringing a road down their flagpole piece and
connecting to Calvary Baptist Church is omitting any connection to the Calvary property. They
are using what became their own property. They do not own this parcel (pointed at a parcel on
the screen) on the corner of this property. There will be two ingresses/egresses total. (Dover
Christian Church property at 1738 Forrest Avenue.)
Mr. Minear asked for Phase IV, where are they looking to egress? Responding to Mr. Minear,
Mr. Steele stated that they are going to use this road (pointed to road on screen) and something
will spit back out up to here (pointed to area on screen, of the same entrance drive to Destiny
Christian Church property). Truthfully, this has not been drawn yet. They’ve got some ideas, but
they haven’t finalized it. It’s probably going to be four buildings in a circle.
Mr. Minear asked if there was any potential connection (on Forrest Avenue). It is his
understanding that a roundabout is going in on Sharon Hill Road and Artis Drive in the future. Is
there any potential connection to that? Responding to Mr. Minear, Mr. Steele stated that they
don’t own anything to the west.
Mrs. Maucher closed the public hearing.
Mr. Witham moved to approve S-24-06 Revised Leander Lakes III Apartments as it does comport
with what Staff had recommended in comments and this seems to be a much more viable way to
resolve the connection for the applicant as opposed to what was apparently in the process before
and also inclusive of the waiver for the elimination of curbing on the access drive, seconded by
Mrs. Denney and the motion was carried 7-0 by roll call vote with Dr. Jones and Mr. Reaves
absent. Mr. Witham voting yes; this Plan is a very comprehensive plan that is a well thought out
plan with a number of already preapproved recommendations and does comport with what they
would like to see from all builders and developers. Mr. Baldwin voting yes; based on Staff
recommendations. Mrs. Welsh voting yes; it is a very frugal revision to the entrance of the
property. Mr. Cooper voting yes; for reasons stated. Mr. Roach voting yes; for reasons stated.
Mrs. Denney voting yes; she thinks that this change in the ingress/egress is like the finishing
touch and obviously the Plan was previously approved. She just wants to note that she really
appreciates the comments that they get from the State Planning Office with regard to these and
to her, that is like the finishing touch when you read everything that has been said. Also
appreciated is the addressing and sharing this ingress/egress instead of making multiple
entrances and exits out on Forrest Avenue. Mrs. Maucher voting yes; based on Staff
recommendations, DAC comments and our prior approval of the project as this is just a
modification to the entrance.
NEW BUSINESS
13
Page 14
CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 2024
Meeting adjourned at 8:27 PM.
Sincerely,
Kristen Mullaney
Secretary
14