CCW Minutes

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE The Council Committee of the Whole met on January 14, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. with Council President Anderson presiding. Members of Council present were Ms. Arndt, Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Hare, Mr. Lewis (via WebEx), Mr. Neil, Dr. Pillsbury, Mr. Rocha, and Dr. Sudler. Mayor Christiansen was also present. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Garfinkel, and Mr. Shevock (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). Mr. Iriowen and Mr. Wilson (Utility) were absent. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Hare moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried. Council Reports – December 2024 First District Dr. Pillsbury reported that she attended their First District Town Hall in December. She explained that it was not well attended but very helpful. She also reported attending all the holiday celebrations and especially enjoyed the Kwanza celebration. Mr. Rocha reported that he attended the same events as Dr. Pillsbury. He was present for the tree lighting ceremony and was the Master of Ceremonies (MC) for the Dashing Through Downtown Dover Parade on Loockerman Street. Second District Mr. Hare reported that the tree lighting ceremony was cold and many of the kids were gone by the time Santa arrived. Mr. Lewis had nothing to report. Third District Mr. Neil reported that he and Ms. Arndt attended the tree lighting ceremony and they “knocked it out of the ballpark” on “We Wish You a Merry Christmas”. He received a constituent complaint regarding shots heard in the Garrison Track, the constituent wanted to know if hunting is still allowed there. He also received a complaint regarding an exceptionally high water bill which Jason Lyon promptly followed up on. He reported receiving multiple complaints regarding snow removal in Wild Meadows. He attended the Library Board meeting and noted that statistically, Kent County residents are using the library more than city residents. Under the new formula, the reimbursement to the city continues to drop. Brian Sylvester, Library Director, intends to prepare a presentation for Kent County Levy Court to request adjusting the formula. Mr. Neil reported sending alerts to the Third District Civic and Homeowners Association leaders regarding the January 13, 2025, Safety Action Workshop held at the Modern Maturity Center, KnowBe4 Scam Alerts, snow removal updates, and resumption of trash pickup.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 14, 2025 PAGE 2 Ms. Arndt reported that she attended the wonderful holiday events. She thanked the staff and volunteers who made the events possible. She also thanked the Dover Fire Department for allowing her to ride in the fire engine so that she did not have to walk in the cold during the parade. She emphasized her enthusiasm for being able to use the fire siren. She attended the 10th anniversary event of the Downtown Development District held at Rail Haus which celebrated the City of Dover's 10 years in the program. Lastly, she attended the Loockerman Street Tour with Governor- Elect Meyer. She explained that it was nice to spend time with him but even more so with the merchants on Loockerman. She explained that there is a lot of energy and excitement about what is to come, and she is looking forward to supporting them as a council member. Fourth District Dr. Sudler reported that he attended the celebration and final walk for Deputy Chief Spicer as well as the tree lighting ceremony. He received complaints about overgrown tree limbs on Forest Avenue as well as Conwell Street. He stated he would turn the pictures over to the City Manager and Assistant City Manager to aid in getting those complaints addressed. He reported receiving a call from a constituent asking the city to create a Homeowner Association Task Force. The constituent stated that those who are part of a homeowners association do not feel they are being treated fairly. At-Large Mr. Boggerty reported that he attended the swearing-in ceremony of Bethany Hall-Long as well as the inauguration of the 153rd General Assembly of Delaware. Mr. Boggerty also paid his respects to Richard “Mouse” Smith, Delaware NAACP President, who tragically passed away unexpectedly. Lastly, Mr. Boggerty reported that on February 8, 2025, he will be hosting a faith- based workshop sponsored by the Gospel Music Workshop of America. They will be showcasing the local youth, artists, and music. Youths aged 10 to high school are welcome to register with talents ranging from singing, writing, musical instruments, dance, and art. Registration will be free and the event is scheduled to be held at The WELL Church. On January 31, 2025, a round table discussion will be held regarding the movie The Forge at The WELL Church. The discussion will be geared towards young men, fathers, and uncles. Council President Anderson Council President Anderson reported that he was unable to attend the tree-lighting ceremony due to being ill. He commended Sankofa on raising the bar on events surrounding the December holidays. He stated they always bring an international flavor to Christmas from different places around the world and he is looking forward to their Martin Luther King events on January 20, 2025. Mr. Anderson reported that on January 18, 2025, he will be attending a preinaugural reception to provide a positive opportunity for the city. He stated there have been positive interactions and meetings with legislators, creating a partnership to represent the mutual constituents. He reported that the constituents from Kirkwood Street had some complaints regarding snow removal, but Queen Street noted that everything was handled perfectly. He praised the sanitation crews for picking up five days' worth of trash in three days after working 12-hour shifts during the snowstorm. Mr. Anderson also reported attending the 10th anniversary event of the Downtown Development District held at Rail Haus.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 14, 2025 PAGE 3 Selection Process of New City Solicitor (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager) Mr. David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, reviewed the background information regarding the selection process of a new city solicitor. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Dr. Sudler thanked him for compiling the data. Dr. Sudler requested a list be compiled of the services that the city is currently paying for. He would like to see the top three areas for which they provide services. He recommended that the conceptual models be provided to the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee so that they can absorb which model might be the best fit for the city. Whether they would like to hire an attorney who would work directly and solely for the City of Dover or what they have been traditionally doing. Dr. Sudler requested that the city publicly post the position and refrain from contacting any individuals directly, to ensure an unbiased hiring process. Dr. Sudler also recommended going outside of Delaware to see what small municipalities in Maryland are doing and bring that to the committee. Dr. Sudler would like to use that information to compile criteria. He would like to see the top five issues that the new solicitor will be dealing with. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that he could certainly do that. He also stated that any individual chosen must be a member of the Delaware Bar and have been practicing law in Delaware. Mr. Hugg stated that they will also need to include attorneys who specialize in other areas such as unions and police matters. Dr. Sudler requested the breakdown of funds that the City is paying by specialty or expertise (unions/police matters) versus how much the city pays the City Solicitor. Dr. Sudler hopes to find an attorney who specializes in many different areas to save the city money. Dr. Sudler noted that currently in the code it does not state that the city has authority to hire outside attorneys, so that may need to be changed. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that some of the attorneys on the list only represent one municipality and a lot of that sometimes depends on where their offices are located. There are a few others who have made representing municipalities a specialty. Mr. Hugg noted that they could specify that the attorney would only represent the City of Dover. Mr. Hugg did reference the City of Rehoboth’s Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and how they did discuss in-house counsel as a full-time employee. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that he believes there is enough work for an in-house attorney and that an in-house attorney would make sense. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that having an in-house attorney could save the city money and give them more access to an attorney who does not charge $400 an hour every 15 minutes. The attorney would be available for Council meetings, Committee meetings, and other meetings as requested. Mr. Hugg noted that there are some advantages to having an in-house attorney. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that he does not believe that they could find an attorney who fits all their needs and that he would not recommend that either. He explained that having worked with bond counsel, labor union, and employment counsel, they are specialized fields and

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 14, 2025 PAGE 4 he would be very cautious of the in-house attorney handling everything. Mr. Hugg noted that right now the City Solicitor and himself are the ones that reach out and work with outside counsel on a regular basis. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Ms. Arndt recommended not making the RFQ process restricted. She recommended creating a list that was fairly general but still encompassed all the necessary requirements. That would give Council the opportunity to negotiate further once they see the proposals. Then at that point, if there are other items that they may want to include, they can negotiate with the applicant. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Hugg stated that if they look at the Rehoboth RFQ documents, under requirements and duties, the fifth one mentions that there are items that the attorney should be familiar with. Then it sets out a list of possible areas of law, so it does not only state land use, zoning, or finance. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Ms. Arndt stated she believes that the Rehoboth RFQ is a good one to build from. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Mr. Boggerty stated that he would be cautious about attempting to find a one-stop shop. While they can have a general attorney who can advise and guide them, they want subject matter experts to the best of their ability, especially because of the time restraints that it could take to perform the task. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that the code does not give them a whole lot of advice as far as the Deputy Solicitor. It requires that there be an attorney licensed to practice in Delaware in a manner as determined by the city solicitor. He stated that historically they have not had a great deal of involvement in selecting the Deputy Solicitor. Mr. Hugg noted that he would be very concerned about having a deputy in a different firm. Mr. Hugg stated that they may want to think about the deputy position and tighten the criteria a bit or define a little more thoroughly what the deputy’s primary role is. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that he would not recommend having an RFQ for each position. Mr. Hugg noted that the language in the code is very vague so it may be to their advantage to at least spell it out more. In addition to stating that they are to be a member of the Delaware Bar and practice for at least five years, maybe a little more specificity with three years’ experience in land use law, and two years’ experience in another field that defines a little more of what the job is. Mr. Hare stated that if they hire a solicitor or if they hire an in-house solicitor, they are going to be held responsible for the advice they give the city to act on. He believes that the solicitor should have the majority of the input on who their deputy is going to be. Mr. Hare explained that if the solicitor is not available then the deputy solicitor attends in their place. Mr. Hare stated that they should hire the solicitor, and then have the solicitor make recommendations for the Deputy Solicitor position. He believes that their main focus should be to get the solicitor hired and then worry about the deputy, but not do both at the same time.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 14, 2025 PAGE 5 Dr. Sudler suggested hiring two hybrid lawyers and a hybrid paralegal who has multiple skill sets. Dr. Sudler stated that his main concern is that sometimes, the deputy solicitor is being paid the same amount as the solicitor. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg noted that in other contracts there is a $50 to $100 difference because the primary solicitors are charging $500 an hour to begin with. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that it was Crystal Carey, who is another attorney at Schmittinger and Rodriguez. She practices a lot as if she were an outside specialty attorney for the city. He believes she handles employment and finance law. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Dr. Sudler stated that he would like to add to the code that the deputy solicitor has at least five years of practicing law experience as well. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that Mr. Rodriguez did indicate to him that they would continue to provide services if the city is not able to hire a new solicitor by May. Mr. Rodriguez has indicated that they will not walk away from the city, but they have indicated clearly that they do not want to continue to be the city’s solicitor on a full-time basis. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Dr. Sudler stated that he would like to see a clause added to the code that the outgoing city solicitor must provide the city with more than 90 or 120 days to properly search for a new solicitor. Possibly a six-month process. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Council President Anderson stated that he does not think that they should shy away from sending notifications to all the firms that provide municipal law as long as they send it to all of them. They cannot pick and choose who to send the notice to. They will also be sending it out in a variety of ways, such as the legal section of the newspaper, the city’s website, and the Delaware League of Local Governments. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hugg stated that there is a subscription service through the Delaware Bar for attorney solicitations as well. Mr. Rocha stated that he would like to have the Legislative, Finance, and Administration committee sit down with Mr. Hugg to figure out the best way to produce the RFQ. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hugg stated that at the bottom of page three of Rehoboth’s RFQ, there is a reference to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) opinion that the selection must be open to the public. Mr. Hugg requested the city clerk to research that particular FOIA decision so they would know precisely what the issues were that resulted in that decision. UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee met with Chairman Neil presiding.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 14, 2025 PAGE 6 Adoption of Agenda Dr. Pillsbury moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Ms. Arndt and unanimously carried. (City Clerk’s Office Note: Mr. Iriowen was noted as being present prior to the committee meeting but did not successfully contact the clerk, therefore he is considered absent.) Request for Alley Abandonment (Improved) – Downtown Mobility Center Project (Dawn Melson-Williams, Principal Planner) – (Alley extending north from Minor Street. Alley which is located in the block between South Governors Avenue and South Bradford Street) Ms. Dawn Melson-Williams, Principal Planner, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the request for abandonment of the improved alley. Staff recommended that the referenced alley be abandoned. If the Utility Committee and/or City Council was in favor of proceeding with the proposed abandonment the following actions were recommended: 1) The Downtown Dover Partnership would have to work with Public Works to relocate two dumpsters for downtown business trash removal and that a waterline would also need to be relocated; 2) That City Council adopt a Resolution setting a public hearing regarding the proposed abandonment for February 10, 2025. Mr. Hare moved to accept staff recommendations. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that currently the alley is improved, meaning it has pavement, and it is owned as a public alley that the city would hold ownership of. In some cases, it crosses individual property lines, but it has been treated as a public alley. She explained that the abandonment is a process to relinquish the ownership of the land mass and that the alley was distributed to the adjacent property owners. In this case, the adjacent property owners at the time are a mix of different individual organizations, including the City of Dover. Ms. Melson-Williams noted that the long-term plan for the six parcels is to be consolidated into one large tract of land for the development of a building. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that parcels 148 and 150 are owned by an entity that was associated with representatives of the partnership. She noted that the process would be that the Utility Committee make a recommendation and that it would be forwarded to City Council. City Council has a few steps that they would have to take for the abandonment of an alley, which would include a public hearing at a council meeting and the adoption of a resolution to take such action. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the short answer would be yes that the Downtown Dover Partnership would have control of the property, or some entity would. She noted that there has been separate action by council regarding some of the city-owned parcels in that area, but this would be a specific process focused on the area of the alley. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that currently, the City of Dover maintains that property. She was unsure if it was in the Charter or the Dover Code of Ordinances that would give council the power to lay out, locate, abandon, et cetera, the streets, sidewalks, alleys, and the

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 14, 2025 PAGE 7 like. There were statements about the abandonment in that it would mean a transfer of ownership, not necessarily one of neglect. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated it would be located in Article Two, Section 27, but was unsure if that was the Dover Code of Ordinance reference or a Charter reference. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hare stated that it would have been easier if it had said that this was the alley where they wanted to build the parking garage and that the city would be turning the property over to the Downtown Dover Partnership. He believed that everyone would have understood that without going through all the abandonment discussion, and that the Downtown Dover Partnership would be responsible for that property once it went through all the approvals, not the city. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the developer of the project would have to fund the relocation of the water line in conjunction with the plans approved by the city’s Department of Water and Wastewater. She does not believe it would be part of the overall utility project in the Loockerman Street Corridor. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the alley would become part of the development area for the building. It would be dissolved, as Mr. Lewis said. She noted that the land that currently served as that alley would become part of the overall development project area, and the building would take up the six parcels. It would no longer be a way to cross that area because the proposed building is a large rectangle that would encompass that area. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Melson-Williams clarified that the alleyway would not be in existence. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated the planning office was not involved with knowing the value of the property. She believed that the code gave council the discretion regarding how the transfer occurs and whether it would need to be purchased or other considerations in transferring the title to it. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that code citation could be found in Article Two (2), Section 27, Power of Council to locate, layout, and locate abandoned streets and sidewalks. She believed that it was part of their Charter. Mr. Hare moved to accept staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Ms. Arndt and unanimously carried. Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project Update (Jason Lyon, Water/Wastewater Director) Mr. Jason Lyon, Water/Wastewater Director, reviewed the background and analysis of the Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project. Staff recommended that the committee provide a recommended direction, based upon the two options provided by staff, to City Council for acceptance and implementation.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 14, 2025 PAGE 8 Dr. Sudler stated that with a lot of financial constraints that the city has gone through, he would go with option two, reduce the scope of the project to meet the minimum requirements of the Environmental Improvement Project (EIP). Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lyon confirmed with the state that the bond bill money could not be used for the Environmental Improvement Project (EIP). Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lyon stated that it would be removing the clarifying rings, planting a meadow, and landscape, and providing a repairing buffer. He noted that a repairing buffer was like a filter before the water goes into the river, but there would be no drainage improvements with that. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lyon stated that the original plan was kind of an open channel through that area, and then revised that to be a culvert, which would allow for future development. The plan was that they would remove any of the contaminated soil as part of the drainage project in concert and the clarifying rings would then stay there because they were thinking about redeveloping it. They would renegotiate with them to eventually redevelop the site. He noted that they do not want to dump a bunch of money into it now until they can get it figured out. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lyon stated that they could go with option two, it could be redeveloped but the drainage would not be there to help. In his opinion, it would not be prudent to develop that site with not enough drainage to pull that through that area, it would be a flooded mess. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lyon stated that the Bayhealth property area was prone to flooding, even though they have been lucky not to experience an event so far. He noted that any event exceeding a 10-year storm, which would have a one in ten chance of happening, would result in flooding in that area. Mr. Neil stated that the idea of having stormwater as an enterprise fund was a wise decision, but the outcome was not wise. He believed that they needed to go back to that because they needed that as a permanent source of funding for stormwater. He explained that the first step would be to take a look as fast as possible at reverse engineering the financials. Mr. Neil stated that they need to consider all properties, including those that do not pay taxes, and divide it up in terms of the money that they need using the smaller houses that are located throughout the city, moving up to how much it would cost them, and then move up to the larger buildings and see what the costs would be for those. There needs to be another method of figuring out how to make the equity between the actual size of the houses or buildings that they are dealing with. Mr. Neil explained that when 30% or more of the properties were not paying taxes, the amount should not have exceeded what it did, so the process had to be reversed. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Lyon stated that if they went with the Environmental Improvement Project (EIP), there would be no upstream drainage improvement project. He noted that it would just do the minimum and the meadow would be there, which would not improve any drainage issues. Mr. Lyon explained that in the notes, they would have to break those agreements, and those discussions would have to happen with the consultants and the organizations involved. He stated

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 14, 2025 PAGE 9 that it would be imperative that they have a game plan for sustainable payments for this, but it is not his jurisdiction. He believed that they should get the drainage improvement project done. It is just a matter of making sure that they have a sustainable plan going forward for it and that it would be the biggest anchor of their capital program for stormwater in the next five years and it needs to be accounted for. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Lyon stated that there has been a conversation with DNREC about the Environmental Improvement Project (EIP). They have been willing to work with the city on a timeline, in regard to the bond bill money, the $8.3 million that would come from the state. He mentioned that they have funds that need to be used before June 30, 2026, but he had received verbal confirmation from the state that they would extend the date if needed. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Lyon acknowledged that there are taxes and payments are out-of- pocket expenses for constituents but reminded them that if the project keeps getting delayed, the cost will rise due to inflation. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Lyon stated that his prediction for the cost to go up would be roughly 3.5% per year. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Lyon stated that they had not considered the idea of bonding the project. He noted that it would come with interest, but they could take a look at that and bring it back to the committee. Mr. Neil suggested that Mr. Lyon work with his staff to find out what the process would be for bonding and reinstating the enterprise fund in a different formula so that they could have options to look at and how it would work. No action was taken at this time. Evaluation of Proposals – White Oak Road Pump Station Grit Removal System Engineering Support (Jason Lyon, Water/Wastewater Director) Mr. Jason Lyon, Water/Wastewater Director, reviewed the background and analysis of the evaluation of proposals for the White Oak Road Pump Station Grit Removal System Engineering Support. Staff recommended awarding the contract to Century Engineering for the White Oak Road Pump Station Grit Removal System Engineering Support, RFP #25-0013WW, for the amount of $65,620. Dr. Sudler moved to accept staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Utility Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 7:46 p.m.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 14, 2025 PAGE 10 LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Chairman Rocha presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Hare moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Boggerty and unanimously carried. Economic Development Fund and Community Development Fund Guidelines (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager Mr. David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, reviewed the proposed Economic Development Fund and Community Development Fund guidelines. Staff recommended approval of the recommended guidelines. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Hugg agreed that they would need something more specific and directed to administer a project. He stated that it was part of the plan and that he was going to take one piece at a time to make sure that council was on board with how they were going to do things. He would then bring something to them depending on whether the application was to be approved by council or not, but he could bring that to them in the next few weeks. Ms. Arndt moved to add a follow-up on receipts or proof that funds were administered in the way that they were intended, a specified timeline so that money is not administered and sit for several years, a means to claw back the funds if the project is not completed and to make sure that it is not to benefit one person, property, or business owner, it is to benefit the community and that must be demonstrated. The motion was seconded by Dr. Sudler and carried with Mr. Lewis abstaining. Ms. Arndt clarified that she intended to approve the guidelines with the inclusion of the items listed, along with the understanding that they will be developing a process. Proposed Ordinance #2025-02 – Project Carry-Forward Budget Balances/Proposed Budget Amendments (Patricia Marney, Controller/Treasurer) Ms. Patricia Marney, Controller/Treasurer reviewed the proposed carry-forward budget balances and Proposed Ordinance #2025-02. Staff recommended approval of the proposed Budget Amendments totaling $24,744,582 for Fiscal Year 2025 and adoption of Ordinance #2025-02. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Marney stated that the items that they would need to look out for would be the stormwater utility. She mentioned that they are reviewing different qualifications and how they can continually fund stormwater utility expenditures. As of right now, they have moved back to the general fund. Fortunately, they have not finished transferring all of the transfers for assets and the employees through the financials as far as booking those entries. As they are looking at the budget being carried forward, those items are already in the general fund. She noted that the documentation was provided in the packet.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 14, 2025 PAGE 11 Ms. Marney stated that they do need to work together as a team to re-evaluate the needs for stormwater utility and come back with a different plan. She believes that they would need a tax increase and then how they packaged that to the citizens going forward would be a challenge for all of them. Ms. Arndt moved to accept the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. Mr. Rocha moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Mr. Anderson moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. David L. Anderson Council President