CCW Packet

CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING Tuesday, September 09, 2025 at 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers, 15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, Delaware AGENDA Public comments are welcomed on any item and will be permitted at the appropriate time. When possible, please notify the City Clerk (302-736-7008 or email at cityclerk@dover.de.us) should you wish to be recognized. VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE This meeting will be held in City Hall Council Chambers with electronic access via WebEx. Public participation information is as follows: Dial: 1-650-479-3208 Link: https://rb.gy/tt2yzg Event number: 2530 458 3225 Event password: DOVER (if needed) If you are new to WebEx, get the app now at https://www.webex.com/ to be ready when the meeting starts. CALL COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING TO ORDER ADOPTION OF AGENDA COUNCIL REPORTS - AUGUST 2025 1. First District 2. Second District 3. Third District 4. Fourth District 5. At-Large 6. Council President Neil 1

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING - September 09, 2025 PAGE 2 PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 1. First State Aquatic Project (Courtney Ford, Head Coach, First State Masters Swimming) (Committee Action Not Required) 2. Review of Active Recreation Plan - The Governor: Mixed Use Building at 120 S. Governors Avenue (Located at 120 S. Governors Avenue and associated parcels at 105, 111, and 115 S. New Street: Site Plan/Architectural Review Certification S-25-11/ HI-25-02) (Dawn Melson- Williams, Principal Planner) (Staff Recommendation: Approval of the Active Recreation Area Plan for the project, subject to the conditions outlined in the Active Recreation Review Report) ADJOURNMENT OF THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 1. Investment Portfolio Presentation (Patricia Marney, Controller/Treasurer, Martin Hammond, Managing Director, PFM Asset Management, and Jeff Fasino, Senior Managing Consultant, PFM Asset Management) (Committee Action Not Required) 2. Change Order - Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project (Jason Lyon, Water & Wastewater Director) (Staff Recommendation: Approval from City Council of the proposed amendments to the engineering design scope by the consulting firms to complete the design of this project.) 3. County and Municipal General Pension Plan Update (Naomi Poole, Human Resources Director, Patricia Marney, Controller/Treasurer, and David S. Hugg, III, City Manager) (Committee Action Not Required) 4. Small Local Cybersecurity Grant Program (SLCGP) Grant Approval for FY26 Information Technology Projects (Joseph Simmons, Information Technology Director) (Staff Recommendation: Recommend approval of the following Small Local Cybersecurity Grant Program (SLCGP) grants totaling $316,000 through the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA): SLCGP-23-1157, SLCGP-23-1158, SLCGP-23- 1159, SLCGP-23-1160, and SLCGP-23-1161, and to authorize the City Manager to perform the necessary budget amendments based upon the awarded) 2

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING - September 09, 2025 PAGE 3 5. Non-Bargaining Step Proposal Discussion (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager) (Staff Recommendation: Discussion and direction for staff) 6. Review of Application for the Economic Development Fund (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager) (Staff Recommendation: Review, revise as needed, and approve) ADJOURNMENT OF THE LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING ADJOURNMENT OF THE COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. PURSUANT TO 29 DEL. C. §10004(e)(2), THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, WHICH ARISE AT THE TIME OF THE MEETING 3

Item 1. First State AQUATIC CENTER Transforming Delaware into a premier sports tourism destination The First State Aquatic Center (FSAC) represents a transformative opportunity to drive economic growth, boost local tourism, and provide essential aquatic facilities to the community. Featuring: 10-lane Olympic/Long course pool Recreational Ninja Cross (obstacle course attraction) 8-lane short course pool Outdoor Water Feature Zero-depth entry multi-use pool Spectator Seating 1,500+ The FSAC is designed to attract elite swimmers from the Mid-Atlantic region and beyond. With its strategic location, experienced leadership, and strong community backing, the FSAC is poised to become a key player in the sports tourism landscape while addressing a critical gap in the community: indoor, year-round swimming pools essential for health, wellness, and water safety in a state surrounded by water. Your investment will help turn this vision into a thriving reality for Delaware. Letters of Support Secure Site and Non-Profit Board Developer Co-Founder, CEO; Community; Courtney Ford, Owner First State Masters Swimming Home of the Delaware Swim Potential Sites: Team; South DAFB, DE Turf, Dover Mall, Co-Founder, Board President; Kitts Hummock/City of Dover Julie Gorman, Owner Edelman Spine & Orthopaedic Capitol School District Planning & Strategy Committee; Caesar Rodney School District Jenn Holmes, Joel Loftus, ReferralNeeded: John Van Gorp, Strohm Edwards State Rep; Services $20-$44mil Resource Development Committee; Kerri Evelyn Harris (pending) Knolan Rawlins, Laurie Judy, John Cribbin 60,-90,000 sq. ft Community Engagement Committee; 5-10 acres Janie Warren, Nanette Holmes, Sean Saxton STEPS IN CURRENT PHASE The FSAC has progressed from the "initiative" phase to a formalized board structure. With governance now in place, the board is actively fundraising to complete the feasibility and AUG 2025 design study. These efforts will provide critical insights into site selection, programming, and long-term sustainability. The project continues to engage stakeholders—including local government officials, community leaders, and potential partners—as it moves closer to realizing its vision. Follow us on social media | @1stMasters Watch our FSAC presentation on YouTube | @1stMastersDE CONNECT Sign the petition | tinyurl.com/ynxrkx3k Email us | FirstStateMastersSwimming@gmail.com 4 Empowering adults to improve their lives through swimming

MODEL FACILITES Item 1. Prince George’s County Sports and Learning Complex Features; 50 meter indoor; community/fitness pool; indoor gymnastics; indoor track; outdoor sport fields as well; classrooms Year; 2000 Size; 240,000 sq. ft Cost; $31 Million Nova Aquatics, VA Features; Macy’s Mall rebuild. An eight-lane 50-meter pool and two three-lane 25-yard pools. locker rooms, dry-land training area, administrative areas, and the Virginia Swim Shop Year; 2018 Size; 50,000 sq. ft Cost; $18 Million Virginia Military Institute Features; Indoor 50-meter swimming pool which holds 800,000 gallons of water. It has two 1-meter springboards, two 3-meter springboards, and a 5-meter dive platform, plus seating for 570 spectators. The pool is large enough to be divided into three sections, making diving, water polo, and competitive swimming possible simultaneously. Year built; 2020 Size; 58,000 sq. ft Cost; $44 Million Rockville Swim and Fitness Center, MD Features; New construction consists of 3 bodies of water: a free-form shaped activity pool with beach entries and interactive play features, a rectangular shaped wellness pool to serve a variety of uses and a water slide structure. Dryland installation of play features, deck areas, shade structures. Year built; 2024 Size; 53,000 sq. ft Cost; $13 Million 5

First State Item 1. AQUATIC P: 928-242-2586 CENTER E: FirstStateMastersSwimming@gmail.com @1stMasters @1stMastersDE Dear Supporter of the FSAC initiative, July 15, 2025 A place to swim, heal, train, and belong — that’s the vision behind the First State Aquatic Center (FSAC). A year-round aquatic and wellness facility designed to meet critical needs in Central Delaware and the Mid-Atlantic region. Despite being a state surrounded by water, Delaware currently lacks an indoor 50-meter pool and has few facilities that are fully accessible to veterans, seniors, families, and athletes all in one place. FSAC will change that. The proposed facility includes: Board of A 10-lane, 50-meter competition pool with seating for 1,500+ Directors An 8-lane short-course pool for lessons, rehab, and fitness A zero-depth entry warm therapy and teaching pool Community Outdoor water feature Engagement Fitness facilities, classrooms, and meeting space Nanette Holmes Dedicated access for teams, masters swimmers, and community use Sean Saxton Janie Warren FSAC will be more than a pool. It will be a community anchor, public health resource, and economic driver — hosting local and regional meets, creating jobs, and delivering Planning and Strategy life-saving swim instruction. Strohm Edwards Your support will help us: Jennifer Holmes Fund the feasibility study Maj. Joel Loftus John Van Gorp Complete design and engineering plans Begin site work and permitting Resource Development Whether you give $50 or $5,000, your donation directly supports this bold and vital John Cribbin project. Make a secure, tax-deductible gift at donorbox.org/fund-the-feasibility-study, Laurie Judy scan the QR code below, or contact us to explore sponsorship and other giving options. Knolan Rawlins Together, we can build something transformative for Delaware. With appreciation, Courtney Ford Julia Gorman Courtney Ford Julia Gorman Co-founder & Executive Director Co-founder & Board President 6

City of Dover Item 2. DATA SHEET FOR RECREATION PLAN REVIEW Review of Active Recreation Area Plan PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING OF September 9, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting of September 15, 2025 Plan Title: The Governor: Mixed-Use Building at 120 S. Governors Avenue, S-25-11 Plan Type: Site Development Plan: Active Recreation Area Plan Location: On the west side of South Governors Avenue and halfway between Reed Street and West Loockerman Street in Dover, DE Addresses: 120 S. Governors Avenue and 105, 111, and 115 S. New Street Tax Parcel: ED-05-077.09-01-144.00-000 (Related Properties) ED-05-077.09-01-37.00-000, ED-05-077.09-01-42.00-000, ED-05-077.09- 01-43.00-000 Owner: Downtown Dover Development Corporation c/o Downtown Dover Partnership and the City of Dover (Parcels at 105 and 115 S. New Street) Property Area: 1.7622 acres +/- (main parcel) 1.9813 acres +/- (total of all parcels) Proposed Use: Mixed-Use Commercial (Grocery, retail, restaurant, child day care center) and Multi-family Housing (Apartments – 120 units) and associated parking Zoning: C-2 (Central Commercial Zone) H (Historic District Zone) I. Project Summary The Governor: Mixed-Use Building at 120 S. Governors Avenue project will be reviewed as a Site Development Plan and for Architectural Review Certification by the Planning Commission. The Plan proposes construction of a mixed-use commercial and multi-family (apartment) building in Downtown Dover, to be located between South Governors Avenue and South New Street, midway between Reed Street and West Loockerman Street. The 1.7622+/- acre property is a vacant lot that was formerly an auto parts retail store and daycare center. The proposal includes a four-story, 139,306 SF mixed-use structure that includes space for retail, child day care, 120 residential apartments, and a roof-top courtyard, with 13 vehicle parking spaces and associated site improvements P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 7 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

S-25-11 The Governor: Mixed-Use Building at 120 S. Governors Avenue Item 2. Summary Report of Active Recreation Component Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee Meeting on September 9, 2025 Page 2 of 5 II. Active Recreation Area Plan Summary: As part of the Plan review process for this project, the applicant is required to provide open space and Active Recreation Area in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article 5, Section 10. Dover Code of Ordinances, Appendix B – Zoning, Article 5 – Supplementary Regulations, Section 10 – Open Space, Recreation and Other Public Facilities (select excerpts). Article 5 Section 10 Section 10. - Open space, recreation, and other public facilities. The City of Dover shall require the reservation of open space, recreation, and other public facilities in accordance with the provisions of this section as a condition of approval for all one-family dwelling, two-family dwelling and multiple-family dwelling residential developments requiring conditional use approval, site development plan approval, or land subdivision approval by the City of Dover Planning Commission. 10.1 Recreation areas. 10.11 Purpose. The purpose of this section is to ensure that active recreation areas are provided as an integral design element within residential developments and that such facilities are of an adequate scale in relation to the size of the residential development and which provide residents with a variety of active recreational pursuits. 10.12 Dedication required. The commission shall require the dedication or reservation of recreation areas, and the subsequent construction of recreation facilities of a character, extent and location suitable to the needs created by a development for recreation facilities as defined and in accordance with the design guidelines set forth. 10.13 Definition. The following are illustrative of the types of recreation areas and subsequent facilities that shall be deemed to serve active recreational needs and therefore to count toward satisfaction of the recreation area requirements of this section: tennis courts, handball courts, racquetball courts, swimming pools, saunas and exercise rooms, meeting or activity rooms within clubhouses, baseball and soccer fields, basketball courts, volleyball courts, swings, slides and play apparatus, and developed walking, jogging or biking trails. Because the project is located within the Downtown Redevelopment Target Area, it qualifies for an exemption under Article 5, §10.515 Residential developments located within the Downtown Redevelopment Target Area as defined in Appendix C. Under this provision, the applicant must provide 75 square feet of active recreation per dwelling unit with a minimum of 2,500 square feet provided on site. See code excerpt: Article 5 §10.5 Exemption to recreation area and open space dedication. 10.51 Exemptions for small developments. 10.515 Residential developments located within the Downtown Redevelopment Target Area as defined in Appendix C. These developments shall be exempt from the area requirements set forth in section 10.16, but shall be required to provide 75 square feet of active recreation area per dwelling unit with a minimum of 2,500 square feet provided on site. If the commission determines that the construction of the entirety of the required active recreation area is not practical or desirable, the commission shall require a cash in lieu donation for the active recreation area determined as not practical or desirable. Cash in lieu shall be calculated in accordance with subsection 10.173 of this article. The plan identifies a proposed 11,090 SF park area located on the three additional parcels along South New Street, to the northwest of the proposed building. This park would feature a dog park, playground area, and pollinator garden along with a variety of trees and shrubs. Although this 8

S-25-11 The Governor: Mixed-Use Building at 120 S. Governors Avenue Item 2. Summary Report of Active Recreation Component Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee Meeting on September 9, 2025 Page 3 of 5 already exceeds the required active recreation square footage (9,000 SF), the plan also proposes a courtyard/wellness area (5,729 SF); fitness center (2,054 SF); and community space (2,995 SF) on the first floor of the building. In addition to first floor amenities, a rooftop courtyard is proposed on the second floor measuring 7,225 SF. The total proposed area of active recreation space for the proposed project is 29,093 SF. This Active Recreation component must be reviewed by the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee for a recommendation prior to consideration of the Site Plan by Planning Commission. The following table provides information from the submitted Plans and drawings for The Governor: Mixed-Use Building at 120 S. Governors Avenue project showing the Active Recreation Area plan. This focuses on the amenities specifically being developed with this project: Required Provided on Plan Active Recreation Area 75 SF per dwelling unit or 5,729 SF Courtyard/Wellness Area (Article 5 §10.515) 2,500 SF, greater thereof 120 DU = 9,000 SF 11,090 SF Park Area of playground area, Requires 9,000 SF dog run, connection walkway 2,054 SF Fitness Center 2,995 SF Community Space 7,225 SF Rooftop Courtyard 20 Interior Bicycle Parking Spaces 20 External Bicycle Parking Spaces Total: 29,093 SF Active Recreation Accessible Elevators are provided on each floor to Amenities access the rooftop courtyard. First floor (Article 5 §10.15) active recreation amenities are accessible via a network of sidewalks with ramps to enter the building Active Recreation Age Oriented to Amenities can be used by a variety of age Amenities development groups. (Article 5 §10.15) Parking The entire site has 13 parking spaces to serve the residents with other parking nearby. Setbacks for equipment and Most amenities are within or associated game courts: 30 feet from with the building and comply. residential lots and 25 feet The distance of the playground equipment from right-of-way for street from the street must be shown and placement may need to be adjusted for compliance. Landscaping The Landscape Plan shows a variety of trees, shrubs, lawn spaces, and a pollinator garden. 9

S-25-11 The Governor: Mixed-Use Building at 120 S. Governors Avenue Item 2. Summary Report of Active Recreation Component Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee Meeting on September 9, 2025 Page 4 of 5 III. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The following are comments and recommendations from Staff of the Department of Planning & Inspections and the Parks & Recreation Department following review of the Active Recreation Area proposed for The Governor: Mixed-Use Building at 120 S. Governors Avenue project. 1. The project plan is required to provide 9,000 SF of Active Recreation Area. The Plan shows a total of 29,093 SF of Active Recreation Area including a 5,729 SF Courtyard/Wellness Area; 2,054 SF Fitness Center; 2,995 SF Community Space; 11,090 SF Park with playground and dog run; and 7,225 SF Rooftop Courtyard. a. Additionally, there is an indoor bike storage area that can store 20 bicycles and 20 exterior bicycle parking spaces. 2. Staff recommends approval of the proposed Active Recreation Area amenities, subject to review of the Active Recreation Plan sheet to confirm details. Staff also notes that this location in the Downtown is in a walkable area where the sidewalk system leads to open space areas like Mirror Lake Park, Silver Lake Park, the Legislative Mall area, and The Green, and to the Capital City Trail system. 3. The following items related to the recreation amenities: a. For playground area provide the distance of equipment from the street right-of- way to ensure compliance with the setback requirements. b. It is recommended that rules for usage of the dog-run area be posted along with any trash/waste disposal equipment. c. Identify if the playground usage will be limited by operations of the child day care center. d. Identify height and materials of the proposed fencing. 4. The applicant is reminded of the requirements for construction phasing of the recreation area associated with the development of the residential units. With all residential units in one building, the recreation amenities will have to be completed in conjunction with the building’s construction and prior to issuance of a Final Certificate of Occupancy. Article 5 §10.6 Construction Phasing. The recreation and open space areas shall be completed in a proportion equal to or greater than the proportion of residential dwelling units completed, except that one hundred (100) percent of the recreation and open space areas shall be completed prior to issuing building permits for the final twenty (20) percent of the dwelling units proposed. Building permits shall not be issued for dwelling units unless the requirements of this section are met. 5. There shall be provisions which ensure that the common open space land (including active recreation area) shall continue as such and be properly managed and maintained. The developer shall either retain ownership and responsibility for maintenance of such open land; or provide for and establish one (1) or more organizations for the ownership and maintenance of all common open space i.e. a Homeowners Association. The organization shall be responsible for maintenance, insurance and taxes on the common open space. 10

S-25-11 The Governor: Mixed-Use Building at 120 S. Governors Avenue Item 2. Summary Report of Active Recreation Component Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee Meeting on September 9, 2025 Page 5 of 5 IV. ADVISORY COMMENTS 1. In the event that major changes and revisions to the Site Plan occur in the finalization of the Site Plan, contact the Department of Planning and Inspections. Examples include reorientation of buildings, relocation of site components, and increases in building floor area. These changes may require resubmittal for review by the Development Advisory Committee, Historic District Commission, Planning Commission, or other agencies and commissions making recommendations in regard to the plan. 2. Clarify the status of ownership status of the parcels at 105 and 115 S. New Street as these is a specific process for the disposal of City owned properties. 3. The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee shall submit to the Planning Commission a report detailing the recommendations as to the Recreation Area Plan. Attachments: • Select Pages from S-25-11 Plan Set: o Cover Sheet and Overall Site Plan (C-001), Active Recreation Plan (C-202), and Landscape Plan Sheet (Z-100) dated August 2025 • Select Floor Plans from the Planning Board Presentation: Ground Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan • Select Building Renderings for view of site from S. Governors Avenue and S. New Street Note: This review Report was initially prepared by Staff of the Rossi Group (under a Planning Services contract with the City of Dover). The Report was completed with additional review and editing by the City’s Planning Office. 11

24x36 24x36 Item 8. WWW.beckermorgan.com GENERAL NOTES : 24x36 24x36 1. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS TAKEN FROM A PLAN ENTITLED "120 SOUTH GOVERNORS SITE AVENUE, PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-44.00-000 - BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AS PREPARED BY SHAHEED A. SMITH GEOSPATIAL, LLC, 2005 S. EASTON ROAD, SUITE 207, DOYLESTOWN, PA 18901 DATED 04-04-24 AND UPDATED ON 03-14-25. S. G 24x36 2. PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, ETC. AS MAY BE SHOWN . 24x36 D ST OR NOTED IN ANY RECORD, PUBLIC OR OTHERWISE, OR ANY REQUIREMENT OR REGULATION OF ANY PUBLIC AGENCY. REE OV E RS 3. THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN WERE TAKEN FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE RECORDS. ADDITIONALLY, A UTILITY MARK-OUT RNO RNO 24x36 WAS PROVIDED BY CENTURY ENGINEERING IN SEPTEMBER 2017. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT MISS UTILITY OF OVE 24x36 DELMARVA (1-800-282-8555) AND ENGAGE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATOR TO VERIFY THEIR EXACT LOCATION PRIOR TO THE S. N RS A S. G START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. ANY DAMAGE INCURRED TO ANY UTILITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY AT THE EW EW S. N CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. IF THE CONTRACTOR RELIES ON THE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON, HE DOES SO AT HIS VE. 24x36 OWN RISK AND WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION DUE TO TIME DELAYS FROM SAID RELIANCE. S T. SITE ARCH I T E C TURE 24x36 . ST. 4. FLOODPLAIN: PARCEL IS LOCATED WITHIN ZONE "X", AREA OF MINIMAL FLOODING HAZARD, BASED ON FEMA FIRM MAP AVE N ST. ENG I NE E R I NG 10001C0167H EFFECTIVE MAY 5TH, 2003. OCK ERMA W. LO T. MAN S Delaware B ECKER M ORGAN G ROUP ARCHITECTURE - ENGINEERING DELAWARE - MARYLAND - NORTH CAROLINA 5. ALL ROADS, PARKING AND OTHER PAVED AREAS WILL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED AND ARE NOT INTENDED OCKER 24x36 FOR DEDICATION. W. LO 24x36 Dover 6. DELAWARE REGULATIONS PROHIBIT THE BURIAL OF CONSTRUCTION DEMOLITION DEBRIS, INCLUDING TREES AND STUMPS REED STREET 302.734.7950 ON CONSTRUCTION SITES. ANY SOLID WASTE FOUND DURING EXCAVATION MUST BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISCARDED. RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH 25' Newark 24x36 7. ALL HANDICAPPED PARKING DEMARCATION, STALLS, AND BUILDING ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL ROAD 302.369.3700 24x36 "AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT" AND ANSI ICC A117.1 - 2017 " ACCESSIBLE AND USABLE BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES" Maryland 8. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970 AND ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS Salisbury 24x36 THERETO APPURTENANT. 410.546.9100 24x36 9. BEFORE THE CONTRACTOR CAN BEGIN CONSTRUCTION HE MUST OBTAIN THE PROPER PERMITS AND/OR APPROVALS FROM KENT COUNTY TAX ASSESSMENT MAP KENT COUNTY TAX ASSESSMENT MAP North Carolina THE CITY OF DOVER (C.O.D.), DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL (DNREC), DELAWARE LANDS N/F Charlotte 24x36 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DELDOT) , KENT CONSERVATION DISTRICT (KCD) AND ALL APPROPRIATE STATE AND UNION AMERICAN METHODIST 2-05-077.09-01-36.01-000 G.M. VICINITY MAP SCALE : 1" = 1,200' LOCATION MAP SCALE : 1" = 400' 980.270.9100 24x36 COUNTY AGENCIES. D.B. 26, PG. 301 X ZONING: C2 Raleigh 10. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF DOVER WATER & WASTEWATER 919.243.1332 24x36 DEPARTMENT AND THE STATE OF DELAWARE (DELDOT) STANDARDS AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS. X LANDS N/F THE CITY OF DOVER SITE DATA Wilmington 24x36 2-05-077.09-01-36.00-000 11. ALL FIRE LANE DEMARCATION AND FIRE LANE SIGNS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE FIRE PREVENTION N 73° 52' 06" E 111.17' D.B. 9182, PG. 28 ZONING: C2 1. OWNER OF RECORD: DOWNTOWN DOVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 910.341.7600 REGULATIONS. X 101 W LOOCKERMAN ST, SUITE 2B 12. ALL WORK WITHIN CITY/DELDOT MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAYS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS AS SET FORTH IN THE DOVER, DE, 19904 www.beckermorgan.com 24x36 CURRENT REVISION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, BY THE DELAWARE X (302) 678-2940 - EMAIL: diane@downtowndoverpartnership.com 24x36 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND ALL CITY OF DOVER REQUIREMENTS. S 16° 49' 03" E 2. ENGINEER / SURVEYOR: BECKER MORGAN GROUP INC. LANDS N/F 40.00' 13. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY CONTROL SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT N 16° 27' 55" W THE CITY OF DOVER 2-05-077.09-01-37.00-000 X 309 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVE. 24x36 VERSION OF THE DELAWARE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 40.00' D.B. 7920, PG. 212 DOVER, DE. 19904 24x36 ZONING: C2 (302) 734-7950 - EMAIL: mhenry@beckermorgan.com 14. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND SEDIMENT / EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT VERSION X N 73° 52' 05" E DELAWARE SEDIMENT AND STORMWATER REGULATIONS BY THE DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND 3. PROPERTY MAP NUMBERS: 2-05-07709-01-4400-00001 7.67' X X X X X X X X X X X X X (ADDITIONAL PROJECT PARCELS) 2-05-07709-01-4300-00001 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL. X X X X X X 24x36 2-05-07709-01-4200-00001 24x36 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL/STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES FOR ALL DIMENSIONS LANDS N/F 2-05-07709-01-3700-00001 OF BUILDINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINTS, AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN, SHOULD ONLY BE USED AS N 16° 27' 55" W DOWNTOWN DOVER X PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION 4. PROPERTY ADDRESS: PARCEL 44.00 120 S. GOVERNORS AVE, DOVER, DE 19904 A REFERENCE TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED PLANS. 26.50' 2-05-077.09-01-42.00-000 D.B. 7943, PG. 126 S 16° 07' 55" E (ADDITIONAL PROJECT PARCELS) PARCEL 43.00 115 S. NEW ST, DOVER, DE 19904 24x36 16. HYDRANT CONNECTIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR ARE PROHIBITED. THIS METHOD MAY NOT BE UTILIZED DURING ANY PHASE OF ZONING: C2 X 34.00' PARCEL 42.00 111 S. NEW ST, DOVER, DE 19904 24x36 THE PROJECT. PARCEL 37.00 105 S. NEW ST, DOVER, DE 19904 LANDS N/F FAMILY LEGACY, LLC 5. PROPERTY LOCATION: LATITUDE N39° 09' 32.26" - NAD83 (2011) 17. ALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINES, STORM DRAINS, AND WATER LINES NOT USED FOR THE PROPOSED FACILITY X 2-05-077.09-01-41.00-000 MUST BE PROPERLY ABANDONED AT THE MAINS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF DOVER WATER & WASTEWATER D.B. 9216, PG. 46 LONGITUDE W75° 31' 39.25" - NAD83 (2011) ZONING: C2 24x36 DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 6. ZONING CLASSIFICATION: EXISTING: C-2 - CENTRAL COMMERCIAL, HISTORIC DISTRICT 24x36 X S 16° 07' 55" E 18. PART II, CHAPTER 180, ARTICLE III, SECTION 180-10 OF THE CODE OF KENT COUNTY REQUIRES THAT "NO PERSON SHALL 26.00' PROPOSED: C-2 - CENTRAL COMMERCIAL, HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDS N/F DISCHARGE OR CAUSE TO BE DISCHARGED ANY STORMWATER, SURFACE WATER, UNCONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER, ROOF N 16° 27' 55" W THE CITY OF DOVER 7. DEED REFERENCE : DEED BOOK: D 4620/342 (PARCEL 44.00) 2-05-077.09-01-43.00-000 X RUNOFF, SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE, UNCONTAMINATED NONCONTACT COOLING WATER, CONDENSATE, OR UNPOLLUTED (ADDITIONAL PROJECT PARCELS) DEED BOOK: D 7920/215 (PARCEL 43.00) 24x36 INDUSTRIAL PROCESS WATERS TO ANY SANITARY SEWER". THE CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL ENSURE DURING 33.50' D.B. 7920, PG. 215 ZONING: C2 NORTHING 422,107.4710 EASTING 624,718.1040 DEED BOOK: D 7943/126 (PARCEL 42.00) 24x36 CONSTRUCTION THAT NO ILLEGAL DISCHARGES TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM ARE CREATED WITH THE SITE N 73° 52' 05" E 302.07' DEED BOOK: D 7920/212 (PARCEL 37.00) IMPROVEMENTS. 5' B.R.L. 8. PRESENT USE: PARKING LOT (FORMERLY PARKING LOT, RETAIL, DAYCARE) 24x36 19. THE SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF DOVER DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND WASTEWATER CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED USE: RETAIL, DAYCARE, RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS 24x36 MANAGER AT 302-736-7025 PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE CITY OF DOVER 9. PROPERTY AREA: PARCEL 44.00 76,762 S.F. (1.7622 ACRES) DSP S 16° 13' 26" E UPPER LEVEL WALL 253.77' DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND WASTEWATER MUST OBSERVE ALL CITY OWNED WATER AND SANITARY SEWER FLOORS 2 - ROOF 10. PROJECT AREA: PARCEL 44.00 76,762 S.F. (1.7622 ACRES) INTERCONNECTIONS AND TESTING. ALL WATER TAPS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A CITY OF DOVER APPROVED CONTRACTOR. (ADDITIONAL PROJECT PARCELS) PARCEL 43.00 3,562 S.F. (0.0818 ACRES) 24x36 THE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR THE WATER TAP MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED IN THE FIELD DUE TO CONDITIONS OF THE PARCEL 42.00 3,653 S.F. (0.0838 ACRES) 24x36 EXISTING MAIN. POSSIBLE CONDITIONS THAT WOULD REQUIRE TAPPING RELOCATION INCLUDE PROXIMITY TO PIPE JOINTS, PARCEL 37.00 2,330 S.F. (0.0535 ACRES) OTHER TAPS, CONCRETE ENCASEMENTS, CONFLICT WITH OTHER UTILITIES, AND THE LIKE. TEST HOLES MUST BE PERFORMED SOUTH GOVERNORS AVE. PROJECT AREA TOTAL: 86,307 S.F. (1.9813 ACRES) 24x36 BY THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE BEST TAPPING LOCATION. THE CITY OF DOVER WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD CONDITIONS REQUIRING ADJUSTMENT OF THE TAPPING LOCATION OR FOR ANY WORK REQUIRED BY THE DAY CARE 11. IMPERVIOUS (LOT) COVERAGE: MAXIMUM ALLOWED: 100% N 24x36 CONTRACTOR TO MAKE AN APPROPRIATE AND LAWFUL CONNECTION. EXISTING: 74,661 S.F. RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH 60' PROPOSED: 69,402 S.F. = 78.6% 20. IF THE APPROVED PLAN NEEDS TO MODIFIED DUE TO ERRORS OR OMISSIONS OR FIELD CONDITIONS, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT 12. BULK STANDARDS: C-2 - CENTRAL COMMERCIAL REQUIRED PROVIDED AND STORM WATER CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE KENT CONSERVATION LOT AREA (MIN.): N/A 1.7622 AC. (PARCEL 44) 24x36 DISTRICT (KCD). LOT WIDTH (MIN.): N/A 255.38 FT. 24x36 LOT DEPTH (MIN.): 70 FT. 302.07 FT. MINOR ARTERIAL 21. THE KENT CONSERVATION DISTRICT (KCD) RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF PERIODIC SITE INSPECTION. FRONT SETBACK: 0 FT. 6.16’(GOVERNORS), 52.27’(NEW) BALCONY SIDE SETBACK: 0 FT. 10.9' (N) - 21.7' (S) 24x36 22. ALL WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY COMPONENTS MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF DOVER WATER FLOOR 2 24x36 REAR SETBACK: 5 FT. N/A & WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS. UPPER LEVEL WALL X SIDE/REAR ADJ RESIDENTIAL: 15 FT. N/A FLOORS 2 - ROOF 23. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINAL GRADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT CITY OF DOVER 13. BUILDINGS: EXISTING: 0 S.F. 24x36 REQUIREMENTS AND PRACTICES. PROPOSED: 40,735 S.F. (1ST FLOOR) 24x36 32,857 S.F. (2ND FLOOR) PROJECT TITLE 24. PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR ORDERING OF MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENGAGE A PRIVATE SOUTH NEW STREET 32,857 S.F. (3RD FLOOR) UTILITY LOCATOR TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT EXTENTS AS WELL AS VERIFYING PROPOSED BUILDING 32,857 S.F. (4TH FLOOR) 24x36 25. ELEVATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES TO BE CROSSED WITH NEW IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT CONFLICTS/ISSUES TO THE ENGINEER. ALL SUBSURFACE UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON SURFACE EVIDENCE COLLECTED FROM THE FIELD RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH 60' FOUR STORY 40,750 S.F. FOOTPRINT F.F. EL.: 32.75' BALCONY TOTAL S.F. AT COMPLETION: HEIGHT: 139,306 S.F. 125 FT. (MAX.) 54'-3" DOWNTOWN 24x36 26. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND THE BEST AVAILABLE RECORDS. AT IT'S MEETING ON MM/DD/YYYY, THE CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION GRANTED CONDITIONAL APPROVAL FLOOR 2 STORIES: FLOOR AREA RATIO: NFPA CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 10 (MAX.) 5.0 (MAX.) TYPE II 4 1.81 DOVER LOCAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT 24x36 OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION #X-XX-XX. DWELLING UNITS 120 24x36 14. UTILITIES: WATER: CITY OF DOVER 24x36 BALCONY FLOOR 2 SEWER: GAS: ELECTRIC: CITY OF DOVER CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CITY OF DOVER CORPORATION 24x36 'THE GOVERNO UPPER LEVEL WALL FLOORS 2 - ROOF 15. PARKING CALCULATIONS : C-2 ZONING (NO REQUIREMENT) REQUIRED: 0 24x36 PROVIDED: 13 (SEE PARKING STATEMENT) 24x36 7 6 HANDICAPPED PARKING REQUIRED : 1 HANDICAPPED PARKING PROVIDED : 1 ( VAN ACCESSIBLE) BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED : 1 EXISTING BUILDING 24x36 BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED : 20 EXTERNAL, 20 INTERNAL (BIKE STORAGE ROOM) 24x36 BALCONY TOTAL PROVIDED : 40 FLOOR 2 16. LOADING CALCULATIONS : LOADING BERTHS REQUIRED : 2 120 S. GOVERNORS AVE. 24x36 17. DUMPSTER CALCULATIONS : LOADING BERTHS PROVIDED : DUMPSTERS REQUIRED : 2 7 CITY OF DOVER 24x36 DUMPSTERS PROVIDED : 2 EXTERNAL, 7 INTERNAL (TRASH ROOMS) KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE 18. TREE PRESERVATION : EX. WOODLAND AREA: 0 S.F. SHEET TITLE WOODLANDS TO BE CLEARED: 0 S.F. (0%) 24x36 TOTAL WOODLANDS REMAINING: 0 S.F. (0%) 24x36 N 16° 27' 55" W TOTAL NON-WOODLAND PROJECT AREA: 86,307 S.F. / 3,000 S.F. / TREE = 28.8 = 29 86,307 S.F. 29 TREES REQUIRED COVER SHEET 24x36 EXISTING TREES TO BE RETAINED: PROPOSED TREES: 7 28 .AND OVERALL 24x36 255.38' TOTAL TREES: 35 19. SIGNAGE : FUTURE PERMIT SUBMISSION .SITE PLAN LOADING ZONE LOADING ZONE 20. OUTDOOR LIGHTING : LIGHTING SHALL BE 1.5 FOOT CANDLES (MINIMUM) AT GRADE 24x36 5' B.R.L. 21. SURVEY DATUM: NGS MONUMENT: . 24x36 VERTICAL: NAVD88 HORIZONTAL: NAD 83 (2011 DSP) - 301.01' S 74° 10' 34" W 24x36 NOTE: X 22. MONUMENTATION: 3 FOUND / 0 SET 24x36 23. SOILS ON SITE: HkB - HAMBROOK-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 0 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES (ENTIRE SITE) PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR ORDERING OF 24. WETLAND AREA: 0.00 ACRES 24x36 MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENGAGE A PRIVATE UTILITY X 24x36 LOCATOR TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN LANDS N/F LANDS N/F 0 15 30 60 LOOCKERMAN SUITES, LLC 1999 PULASKI PROPERTY LLC 24x36 THE PROJECT EXTENTS AS WELL AS VERIFYING ELEVATIONS OF ALL 2-05-077.09-01-45.00-000 D.B. 9489, PG. 104 2-05-077.09-01-45.00-000 D.B. 13300, PG. 303 24x36 ZONING: C2 ZONING: C2 UTILITIES TO BE CROSSED WITH NEW IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR Do Not Explode - Select Scale SCALE: 1" = 30' 24x36 SHALL REPORT CONFLICTS/ISSUES TO THE ENGINEER. 24x36 ISSUE BLOCK LEGEND C-1-Notes-Legend-Landscape 24x36 ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED 24x36 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SANITARY GRAVITY SEWER LINE (S) EX. 10"S 10" S SIZE & FLOW DIRECTION CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SLAB / PAVING 24x36 SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN (F.M.) EX. 10" F.M. 12" F.M. 24x36 IMPERVIOUS SURFACED ROAD, DRIVE SIZE & FLOW DIRECTION OR PARKING LOT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (S.S.M.H.) INDIVIDUAL TREE OR BUSH EVERGREEN DECIDUOUS N/A OWNERS CERTIFICATION SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT (C.O.) 24x36 WIRE FENCE X X X X X X 24x36 WATER MAIN & SIZE EX. 10" W 12" W WE, DOWNTOWN DOVER PARTNERSHIP, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE ARE THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AND CHAINLINK FENCE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, THAT THE PLAN WAS MADE AT OUR DIRECTION, AND THAT WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE SAME TO BE OUR ACT STOCKADE FENCE FIRE HYDRANT (F.H.) F.H. F.H. AND DESIRE THE PLAN TO BE DEVELOPED AS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. . . . . 24x36 WATER VALVE (W.V.) OR METER (W.M.) 24x36 STRUCTURE (CONCRETE, WOOD, MARK DATE DESCRIPTION METAL, ETC.) W.M. W.V. W.M. W.V. LAYER STATE: C-001 STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (S.D.M.H.) DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE DOWNTOWN DOVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DATE PROJECT NO.: 2025041.00 24x36 STORM DRAIN LINE (CMP, RCP, HDPE) 24x36 WETLAND BOUNDARY LINE N/A V V V ENGINEERS CERTIFICATION DATE: 8-1-25 CONTOUR 49 55 CATCH BASIN (C.B.) SHEET INDEX ELEVATION SPOT SHOT 43.55 25.50 T.C. UTILITY POLE W/ OVERHEAD SERVICE C-001 COVER SHEET AND OVERALL SITE PLAN I, J. MICHAEL RIEMANN, P.E., HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A REGISTERED ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE, THAT THE SCALE: 1" = 30' 25.15 24x36 BENCH MARK 25.00 B.C. (TELEPHONE (O.T.), ELECTRIC (O.E.) C-101 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON HAS BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND TO MY BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND DRAWN BY: M.J.H. PROJ. MGR.: M.J.H. 24x36 N/A UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC (U.E.) C-201 SITE, UTILITY & GRADING PLAN BELIEF REPRESENTS GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES AS REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. U.E. U.E. PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SHEET UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE (U.T.) U.T. U.T. C-202 ACTIVE RECREATION PLAN Z-100 LANDSCAPE PLAN C-001 24x36 CENTERLINE 24x36 UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN (G) EX. 2" G 2" G LIGHT POLE J. MICHAEL RIEMANN, P.E DATE COPYRIGHT 2025 12 F:\Projects\2025\202504100\10_Civil\DWG\2025041-SITE-C3D21.dwg, Aug 01, 2025 - 10:57am .PDF 24x36 24x36 2025-08-01

24x36 24x36 Item 8. 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 ARCH I T E C TURE 24x36 ENG I NE E R I NG T Delaware EX. SIDEWALK 24x36 24x36 PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-36.01-000 Dover 302.734.7950 Newark 24x36 302.369.3700 24x36 Maryland Salisbury 24x36 410.546.9100 24x36 PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-37.00-000 PARK / PLAYGROUND North Carolina 24x36 Charlotte 24x36 980.270.9100 Raleigh PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-42.00-000 919.243.1332 24x36 Wilmington 24x36 910.341.7600 www.beckermorgan.com EX. SIDEWALK 24x36 24x36 PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-43.00-000 24x36 24x36 5' B.R.L. 24x36 24x36 REF. 24x36 24x36 REF. REF. REF. UTILITIES / REF. REF. REF. REF. REF. WASTE REF. REF. 24x36 24x36 ENCLOSURE FITNESS AREA REF. REF. REF. CENTER REF. REF. 24x36 REF. REF. REF. 24x36 REF. 24x36 COMMUNITY 24x36 SPACE COMMUNITY DSP EX. SIDEWALK REF. REF. 24x36 SPACE 24x36 COURTYARD / N 24x36 WELLNESS AREA 24x36 24x36 24x36 REF. REF. REF. REF. S. GOVERNORS AVE. 24x36 24x36 S. NEW STREET ROOFTOP AMENITY COURTYARD 7,225 SF 24x36 24x36 PROJECT TITLE 7 6 EX. SIDEWALK DOWNTOWN 24x36 REF. REF. 24x36 REF. DOVER REF. DEVELOPMENT 24x36 24x36 REF. REF. REF. REF. REF. REF. A.2 24x36 REF. REF. REF. CORPORATION 24x36 24x36 'THE GOVERNO 24x36 LOADING ZONE LOADING ZONE 24x36 24x36 MINOR ST (PAPER) 120 S. GOVERNORS AVE. 5' B.R.L. B V CITY OF DOVER 24x36 24x36 EX. SIDEWALK KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE EX. SIDEWALK SHEET TITLE 24x36 24x36 ACTIVE 24x36 RECREATION PLAN 24x36 1ST FLOOR SITE PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN . 24x36 1 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 2 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" . 24x36 0' 15' 30' 60' 0' 15' 30' 60' 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 0 15 30 60 24x36 24x36 120 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVENUE Do Not Explode - Select Scale ACTIVE RECREATION TABULATIONS (SQUARE FEET) SCALE: 1" = 30' 24x36 24x36 ISSUE BLOCK FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR FOURTH FLOOR PERCENTAGE TOTAL (SF) 24x36 24x36 COURTYARD/WELLNESS AREA 5,729 - - - 19.7% 5,729 FITNESS CENTER 2,054 - - - 7.1% 2,054 24x36 24x36 COMMUNITY SPACE 2,995 - - - 10.3% 2,995 24x36 PARK 11,090 - - - 38.1% 11,090 24x36 ROOFTOP COURTYARD - 7,225 - - 24.8% 7,225 . . . . 24x36 24x36 TOTAL ACTIVE RECREATION SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIRED (75 SF PER UNIT - TOTAL UNITS = 120) 9,000 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION LAYER STATE: Rec Plan TOTAL ACTIVE RECREATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED 29,093 PROJECT NO.: 2025041.00 24x36 24x36 DATE: 8-1-25 SCALE: 1" = 30' DRAWN BY: CS PROJ. MGR.: M.J.H. 24x36 24x36 SHEET 24x36 DRAWING BY CORE STATES GROUP C-202 COPYRIGHT 2025 24x36 13 F:\Projects\2025\202504100\10_Civil\DWG\2025041-REC PLANS-C3D21.dwg, Aug 01, 2025 - 9:57am .PDF 24x36 24x36 2025-08-01

34 8.26' Item 8. MATERIALS LEGEND PLANTING LEGEND TREE PROTECTION LEGEND 6' WOODEN FENCE LP STORM INLET 56.49' 20.97' CONC. PAVEMENT, LAWN TREE PROTECTION GRT=33.36 INV.=28.11 (18"RCP) PEDESTRIAN FENCE, NON-MOVEABLE MATERIALS SCHEDULE 34.14' X 36.99' G.M. CONC. PAVEMENT, CANOPY TREE TREE PROTECTION CONC. CURB X VEHICULAR - SEE CIVIL FENCE, MOVEABLE T DOG WASTE BIN. 12" CIP X UNIT PAVEMENT, TRUNK PROTECTION 8' PEDESTRIAN 5'-0" 77.68' EXISTING TREES STIPULATION FOR REUSE MIN. CO X QC TO REMAIN (6) THIS DRAWING WAS PREPARED FOR USE ON A SPECIFIC UNIT PAVEMENT, UNDERSTORY TREE, SITE, AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR USE ON A DIFFERENT DEP. CURB OVERHEAD WIRE X 1 PROJECT SITE OR LATER TIME. USE OF THIS DRAWING FUTURE DOG HT=12.8' VEHICULAR - SEE CIVIL MULTI-STEM FOR REFERENCE OR EXAMPLE ON ANOTHER PROJECT CO STUB CC REQUIRES THE SERVICES OF PROPERLY LICENSED PARK & NATURE X LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS. PRODUCTION PLAYSCAPE PB 1 ASPHALT PAVEMENT, UNDERSTORY TREE, OF THIS DRAWING FOR REUSE ON ANOTHER PROJECT IS DOG PARK SINGLE-STEM NOT AUTHORIZED AND MAY BE CONTRARY TO THE LAW. AR OVERHEAD WIRE X QR VEHICULAR - SEE CIVIL HT=13.2' 34 1 PROJECT TEAM 4 PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-37.00-000 X OVERHEAD WIRE CARPENTRY SHRUB HT=13.8' EXISTING FENCE PAVEMENT OWNER OF RECORD: X TO REMAIN DOWNTOWN DOVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CC 6' WOODEN FENCE PERMEABLE X X X X X X X X X X X 101 W LOOCKERMAN STREET X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X X X X X X X ENGINEERED WOOD SUITE 2B UP 17234 34 FIBER SAFETY SURFACE DOVER, DE, 19904 X HEDGE FOR AG DEVELOPER: SCREENING, PB PLANTING BED 1 PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-42.00-000 MOSAIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS JV 33 X 3' MIN. HT. 3002 CECIL B. MOORE AVENUE SUITE 202 X PHILADELPHIA, PA 19121 34 PROJECT INFORMATION TREE PRESERVATION 215-921-8107 X DEP. STUB NATURE PB CURB PO PB · PROJECT NAME: MIXED-USE BUILDING AT 120 S · EXISTING WOODLAND AREA: 0 SF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: OVERHEAD WIRE PLAYSCAPE 35.43 1 HT=14.2' X CONC. RETAINING GOVERNORS AVENUE, HI-25-02 · WOODLANDS TO BE CLEARED: 0 SF (0%) STUDIO SUSTENA 35 · ZONING CLASSIFICATION: · TOTAL WOODLANDS REMAINING: 0 SF (0%) OVERHEAD WIRE WALL 4537 WAYNE AVENUE HT=14.2' 33 EXISTING TREE EXISTING: C-2 - CENTRAL COMMERCIAL, HISTORIC DISTRICT · TOTAL NON-WOODLAND PROJECT AREA: 86,307 SF X 35.11 34 SUITE 201 PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-43.00-000 TO REMAIN (1) 4'-HIGH PRIVACY PROPOSED: C-2 - CENTRAL COMMERCIAL, HISTORIC · 86,307 SF / 3,000 SF / TREE = 28.8 = 29: 29 TREES 35 35 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19144 AG X FENCE, MOUNT DISTRICT REQUIRED 215-247-8784 | STUDIO-SUSTENA.COM OVERHEAD WIRE POLLINATOR TO TOP OF WALL · PARCEL NUMBERS: · EXISTING TREES TO BE RETAINED: 7 1 HT=14.5' GARDEN UP NO WIRES X DEP. ED-05-077.09-01-44.00-000 (MAIN PARCEL) · PROPOSED TREES: 28 ARCHITECT: TRENCH DRAIN - 5'-0" 32 CURB STUB IRON PIPE 33 35 5'-0" ED-05-077.09-01-43.00-000 · TOTAL TREES: 35 (ALL TREES SHALL HAVE A 1-YEAR CORE STATES GROUP UP 34 SEE CIVIL MIN. ED-05-077.09-01-42.00-000 REPLACEMENT GUARANTEE) 1315 WALNUT STREET FOUND & HELD 34 PB ED-05-077.09-01-37.00-000 SUITE 600 CONC. CURB 5' B.R.L. LS 33 · TOTAL ACREAGE: PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107 ED-05-077.09-01-44.00-000: 1.7622 ACRES (MAIN PARCEL) TREE PROTECTION 215-609-4609 3 OVERHEAD CO ED-05-077.09-01-43.00-000: 0.0818 ACRES WIRE NC . · LOTS IN NON-WOODLAND AREAS EXPECTED TO RETAIN QR HT=27.1' IRON PIPE ED-05-077.09-01-42.00-000: 0.0838 ACRES CIVIL ENGINEER: RB EXISTING TREES TO MEET TREE DENSITY FOUND & HELD CU ED-05-077.09-01-37.00-000: 0.0535 ACRES BECKER MORGAN GROUP, INC. 1 OVERHEAD WIRE WALK-OFF STRIP, REQUIREMENTS: PB PROJECT AREA TOTAL: 1.9813 ACRES 309 S. GOVERNORS AVENUE HT=26.1' TYP. ED-05-077.09-01-43.00-000 DOVER, DE 19904 ED-05-077.09-01-37.00-000 302-734-7950 · TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND AG OVERHEAD WIRE DEP. SETBACKS & YARD AREAS EACH INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP OF PROXIMATE TREES TO HT=26.3' CURB 1 REQUIRED ACHIEVED BE PROTECTED. · TREE PROTECTION AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY FRONT SETBACK 0' 5.8' FENCING AND SILT SOCKS SITUATED TO COINCIDE MV PB DEP. WITH THE DRIPLINES OF THE TREE OR GROUP OF 1 CURB SIDE YARD NONE REQUIRED 10' ON THE NORTH TREES TO BE PRESERVED. DUMPSTER/ BUT 5' MIN. IF 22' ON THE SOUTH · PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE ERECTED PRIOR TRANSFORMER PROVIDED TO CONSTRUCTION AND MUST REMAIN UNTIL THE 34 CONC. CURB ENCLOSURE PB FINAL LANDSCAPE IS INSTALLED. REAR YARD 20' ABOVE GROUND 37' GROUND FLOOR · TEMPORARILY MOVEABLE SECTIONS OF FENCING MAY FLOOR. AT GROUND 54' ABOVE GROUND BE CONSIDERED FOR LIMITED AREAS WHERE 32 FLOOR 5' REQUIRED FLOOR LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MAY OCCUR, SUCH AS GT PAVEMENT IN A FILL CONDITION. NO EXCAVATION CAFE TABLE AND SHALL OCCUR IN THESE AREAS. 1 CHAIRS, TYP. SENSITIVE HABITAT INFORMATION · SURVEY PREPARED BY SHAHEED A. SMITH EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PB PB LS · GEOSPATIAL, LLC ON 4/4/25 WETLANDS PRESENT ON SURVEY: NONE · TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND SILT SOCKS SHALL MIXED-USE HEDGE FOR SCREENING, 3' MIN. HT. 3 · WOODLANDS PRESENT ON SURVEY: NONE BE INSTALLED TO AVOID SEDIMENTATION INTRUSIONS AND EROSION IN TREE PROTECTION AREAS. BUILDING NS · SEE CIVIL FOR ADDITIONAL E&S INFORMATION. 120 S GOVERNORS AVE. PB PB 1 DOVER, DE 19904 METAL WALL, TYP. CONC. CURB GT CC WATER FEATURE 3 2 CHAIRS PB SEAL: DEP. CURB 33 STORM INLET GRT=31.73 INV.=27.54(12" RCP) PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-44.00-000 PB PB 7 6 PB CONC. CURB ISSUE BLOCK: PB 31 32 BENCH, TYP. DEP. CURB DEP. CURB HEDGE FOR SCREENING, 3' MIN. HT. DEP. CURB STORM INLET GRT=31.75 INV.A=29.88(8" PVC) INV.B=29.50(12" RCP) MV LOADING LOADING 1 ZONE ZONE CONC. CURB CONC. CURB 19'-0" MIN. GROCERY B PB A CONC. CURB TRUCK ACCESS LOADING ZONE 5' B.R.L. CONC. CURB 6.4' E X 32 CHECKED BY: LM X PIPE FOUND DRAWN BY: XW/LM 33 (DISTURBED) 31 CO 0.25' NW OFF LINE SCALE: AS NOTED 33 SHEET NAME: DEP. CURB 8' CHAIN LINK FENCE X 32 99.28' X LANDSCAPE PLAN 32.4 40.36' 24.60' 32.14 TC 31.76 BC SHEET NUMBER: 0' 20' 40' 60' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" Z-100 14

Item 2. 120 S GOVERNORS AVENUE MIXED USE DOVER, KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE PLANNING BOARD PRESENTATION PLANNING BOARD PRESENTATION | 1 AUGUST 2025 DOWNTOWN DOVER PARTNERSHIP | MOSAIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS JV + COLONIAL PARKING 15

S 09°06'07" E 48.20' N 08°44'17" W 48.59' L02- RESIDENTIAL FLOOR 32,387 S 09°05'49" E 48.31' RESIDENTIAL L03 - RESIDENTIAL FLOOR 32,387 12" CIP EX. SIDEWALK PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-36.01-000 77.68' S 81°30'37" W 81.64' T L04 - RESIDENTIAL FLOOR L05 - RESIDENTIAL FLOOR GROUND FLOOR PLAN 32,387 32,387 Item 8. 129,548 OVERHEAD WIRE N 81°30'37" E 111.64' S 81°30'20" W 30.00' HT=12.8' N 08°44'12" W 40.00' S 09°15'08" E 40.00' OVERHEAD WIRE HT=13.2' Total Building Area in SF: 169,080 OVERHEAD WIRE HT=13.8' PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-37.00-000 Total Development Site Area from assemblage below: 85,377 120 S. Governors Ave | Parcel ID: ED05-077.09-01-44.00 74,052 S 81°30'31" W 112.00' 115 S. New Street | Parcel ID: ED05-077.09-01-43.00 3,484 S 08°29'27" E 34.00' N 08°29'29" W 33.50' N 08°29'29" W 26.50' 111 S. New Street | Parcel ID: ED05-077.09-01-42.00 3,485 PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-42.00-000 S 08°29'29" E 7.50' 105 S. New Street | Parcel ID: ED05-077.09-01-37.00 4,356 N 81°30'31" E 60.50' C-2 Allowable FAR per DRAFT Proposed Ordinance 2024-01 C-2 Zone Revisions 5.0 S 08°55'29" E 60.00' N 81°30'31" E 60.50' EX. SIDEWALK OVERHEAD WIRE Proposed FAR 2.0 S 08°29'29" E 26.00' HT=14.2' OVERHEAD WIRE HT=14.2' PARCEL ED-05-077.09-01-43.00-000 OVERHEAD WIRE HT=14.5' 302.07'(SURVEY) N 81°30'31" E 304.33'(DEED) 5' B.R.L. CAFE BOH STAIR 1 COFFEE SHOP ELEC. BIKE PACKAGE REST. REST. OVERHEAD WIRE HT=26.3' BOH CORR. UTILITIES / DAYCARE FITNESS CORR. WASTE ENCLOSURE MAIL AREA AREA BUILDING STOR. MECH. /MAINT. ELEV 1/2 WATER 253.77' COMMUNITY SPACE COMMUNITY SPACE 255.38' A (15 NSF/UNIT) KIT. B (15 NSF/UNIT) EX. SIDEWALK FCC LOBBY SOUTH BRADFORD STREET COURTYARD / WELLNESS AREA LEASING OFC WEST VEST. S. GOVERNORS AVE. NEW ST. ENTRY GOVERNOR ST. S. NEW STREET ENTRY S 08°35'00" E SHOPPING CART RETURN BREAKROOM TEMPORARY 0 1 BENCHMARK 2 2.3 7 6 3 MAG NAIL EX. SIDEWALK ELEV.=32.20 4 GROCERY RETAIL 5 N 08°49'29" W FLOOR RETAIL BAY 3 6 6.6 7 7.1 A GROCERY TRASH RETAIL CORR. RETAIL BAY 2 A.2 BATHROOM GROCERY GROCERY FREIGHT RECEIVING AREA / REFRIGERATION RETAIL BAY 1 LOADING STOCK ROOM AREA STAIR 2 LOADING ZONE MINOR ST (PAPER) 5' B.R.L. LOADING ZONE B 6.4' N 81°49'00" E 127.14' V S 81°49'00" W 301.01'(SURVEY) P.O.B. S 08°11'00" EX.ESIDEWALK 22.00' 303.60'(DEED) EX. SIDEWALK N 08°11'00" W 45.00' 251.00' TIE TO S 08°11'57" E 24.32' S 82°29'14" W 112.15' 99.28' 40.36' 24.60' LOOCKERMAN STREET B.8 S 81°49'00" W 15.00' C CORE STATES GROUP | 1 AUGUST 2025 120 S GOV ERNORS AV ENUE MIX ED US E D OW N TOW N DOV E R PA RT NE R SHIP | MO SAIC DE VE LO P ME N T PARTN ERS J V + COLON IAL PARK IN G 516

FLOOR PLAN INFORMATION THE SET CONTAINS DRAWINGS AT DIFFERENT SCALES. IT IS THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS THAT CERTAIN INFORMATION IS GIVEN SPECIFICALLY ON EACH SERIES OF DRAWINGS AS FOLLOWS: OVERALL DRAWINGS - A-100 SERIES (1/16" = 1'-0") SECOND FLOOR PLAN Item 2. • OVERALL BUILDING PLAN LAYOUT • BUILDING ELEVATION, BUILDING SECTION AND WALL SECTION MARKERS • OVERALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS (TO FINISH FACE) • MATCHLINE DESIGNATION FOR SECTOR DRAWINGS SECTOR PLANS - A-110 SERIES (1/8" = 1'-0") The Philadelphia Building • PLAN LAYOUT PER SECTOR 1315 Walnut Street • DIMENSIONING Suite 600 • PARTITION TYPES Philadelphia, PA 19107 • KEYS TO ENLARGEMENTS (STAIRS/ELEVATORS/AMENITY SPACES) LEVELS L01 L02 L03 L04 TOTAL MIX 215.609.4609 • DOOR TAGS STAIR • DETAIL KEYS www.core-states.com BETA ALPHA DELTA DELTA ALPHA DELTA DELTA BETA DELTA ALPHA • PRIMARY FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT DELTA 0 11 11 11 33 28% ALPHA FLOOR PLAN 0 LEGEND21 21 21 63 53% BETA 0 FIRE EXTINGUISHER FE 7 7 7 21 18% GAMMA FIRE 0 EXTINGUISHER CABINET FEC 1 1 1 3 3% ALPHA SUBTOTALS 0 TWO WAY COMMUNICATION TWC 40 40 40 120 100% UNIT CHANGE IN FLOOR ELEVATION. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF OFFSET. BUILDING SERVICES BETA ALPHA DELTA DELTA BETA DELTA DELTA BETA NOT IN SCOPE PROGRESS PRINT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT ELEV NOT FOR OVERALL FLOOR PLAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ALPHA NOTES 6/10/2025 1:17:26 PM ELEV UNIT 1. UNITS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY, REFER TO THE UNIT PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2. REFER TO PARTITION TYPES FOR PARTITION THICKNESS AND DETAILS, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL WALL THICKNESS DIMENSIONS WITH SHEAR WALL LOCATIONS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3. PROVIDE MOISTURE-RESISTANCE GYPSUM WALL BOARD AT ALL WET WALLS. 4. PARTITION DEPTH AT FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET LOCATIONS SHALL ACCOMMODATE FULL CONCEALMENT OF CABINETS AS SPECIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER. 5. REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR ALL FLOOR DRAIN LOCATIONS. 6. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE THE ROUGH MATERIAL (FACE OF FRAMING, MASONRY, AND/OR CONCRETE.) ALPHA ALPHA 7. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DIMENSIONS TO WINDOWS AND DOORS ARE TO MASONRY OPENINGS IN CMU AND/OR CONCRETE AND CENTERLINE OF OPENING IN UNIT UNIT FRAMED WALLS. PARTITIONS ABOVE OPENINGS SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE PARTITIONS BESIDE THE OPENING. COORDINATE WALL CONSTRUCTION WITH PARTITION TYPES. 8. ALL HINGED DOORS SHALL BE SET FROM HINGE SIDE 6" FROM THE NEAREST PERPENDICULAR PARTITION, AND 4" FROM THE NEAREST PERPENDICULAR PARTITION WITHIN A RESIDENTIAL UNIT, UNO. 9. CONSTRUCTION OF FIRE-RATED PARTITIONS, INCLUDING TAPING A FINISHING OF GYPSUM WALLBOARD FOR FULL HEIGHT TO STRUCTURE ABOVE, SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL SPECIFICATIONS TO ACHIEVE RATING INDICATED. CONSTRUCT HIGHER RATED PARTITIONS FIRST, THEN PROCEED TO LOWER RATED PARITIONS, SEE ALPHA ALPHA PARTITION TYPES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 10. ACOUSTICAL (SOUND-ISOLATION) PARTITIONS SHALL BE SEALED FOR FULL HEIGHT TO UNIT UNIT PREVENT PASSAGE OF AIRBORNE SOUND. TAPE AND FINISH ALL GYPSUM WALLBOARD JOINTS AND FASTENERS (INCLUDING ABOVE CEILING). CAULK AT PERIMETER AND SEAL AT PENETRATIONS. 11. PROVIDE APPROVED FIRESTOPPING MATERIAL AT PENETRATIONS OF FIRE RATED PARTITIONS. 12. SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 13. DIMENSION TO WINDOW CENTER LINE, WINDOWS ARE VERTICALLY ALIGNED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 14. REFERENCE BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR WALL TYPE FINISHES. Project: ALPHA ALPHA 15. REFERENCE ID SHEETS TO NOTE ALL MILLWORK AND POTENTIAL HALF WALLS. 16. PER UL DESIGN ALTERNATE FRAMING FOR SOFFITS OR DROPPED CEILINGS BELOW NEW MIXED-USE UNIT UNIT THE FLOOR TRUSSES WITHOUT CREATING A SECONDARY CONCEALED SPACE IS ALLOWED. DEVELOPMENT 120 GOVERNORS AVENUE ROOF COURTYARD 120 Governors Avenue Dover, DE 19904 FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES ALPHA ALPHA 1 NOTE UNIT UNIT 2 NOTE ALPHA ALPHA BETA DELTA BUILDING UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT ALPHA SERVICES ALPHA UNIT UNIT Owner: MOSAIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 3002 CECIL B. MOORE BUILDING AVENUE SERVICES PHILADELPHIA, PA 19121 TRASH Autodesk Docs://2391.00-24 120 South Governors Avenue/2391_00-24 120 South Governors Avenue_4 Story.rvt ROOM ALPHA ALPHA BETA DELTA ALPHA GAMMA Issue/Revision: UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT ELEV UNIT UNIT STAIR Drawn: Author Reviewed: K. SKINNER Contact: M. MCCLOSKEY Project Number: 2391.00-24 Sheet Title: SECOND FLOOR PLAN 6/10/2025 1:17:26 PM SECOND FLOOR - BLOCK PLAN Sheet Number: 120 S GOV ERNORS AV ENUE MIX 1 CORE STATES GROUP | 1 AUGUST 2025 ED US E A-102 0' 4' 8' 16' SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" D OW N TOW N DOV E R PA RT NE R SHIP | MO SAIC DE VE LO P ME N T PARTN ERS J V + COLON IAL PARK IN G 717

PERSPECTIVE VIEW - S GOVERNORS AVE Item 2. 2: VIEW FACING SOUTH WEST FROM S GOVERNORS AVENUE CORE STATES GROUP | 1 AUGUST 2025 120 S GOV ERNORS AV ENUE MIX ED US E D OW N TOW N DOV E R PA RT NE R SHIP | MO SAIC DE VE LO P ME N T PARTN ERS J V + COLON IAL PARK IN G 1518

PERSPECTIVE VIEW - S NEW STREET Item 2. 3: VIEW FACING EAST FROM S NEW STREET CORE STATES GROUP | 1 AUGUST 2025 120 S GOV ERNORS AV ENUE MIX ED US E D OW N TOW N DOV E R PA RT NE R SHIP | MO SAIC DE VE LO P ME N T PARTN ERS J V + COLON IAL PARK IN G 1619

PERSPECTIVE VIEW - S NEW STREET Item 2. 4: VIEW FACING NORTH EAST FROM S NEW STREET CORE STATES GROUP | 1 AUGUST 2025 120 S GOV ERNORS AV ENUE MIX ED US E D OW N TOW N DOV E R PA RT NE R SHIP | MO SAIC DE VE LO P ME N T PARTN ERS J V + COLON IAL PARK IN G 1720

Item 1. CITY OF DOVER Investment Performance Review For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 PFM Asset Management Client Management Team A division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc Marty Hammond, Managing Director 200 Princeton South Corporate 213 Market Street Robert Cheddar, CFA, Managing Director Center, Suite 270A Harrisburg, PA 17101-2141 Jeffrey Fasino, Institutional Sales and Relationship Manager Ewing, NJ 08628 717-232-2723 Alessandra Demsko, Institutional Sales and Relationship Manager 609-452-0263 NOT FDIC INSURED : NO BANK GUARANTEE : MAY LOSE VALUE 21 For Institutional Investor or Investment Professional Use Only - This material is not for inspection by, distribution to, or quotation to the general public

Item 1. • Market Summary • Portfolio Review 22 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 2 of 21

Item 1. Market Summary 23 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 3 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 DOVER, CITY OF Market Item Summary 1. Summary future growth. However, consumer spending slowed notably, which may foreshadow decreased spending and investment due to declining confidence going forward. • The second quarter of 2025 was characterized by growing uncertainty as markets reacted to the volatile rollout of tariffs that were larger than expected. Markets Interest Rates reacted negatively during the first two weeks of the quarter and experienced the • The U.S. Treasury yield curve steepened over the quarter. The front end of the yield curve largest declines since the onset of the COVID pandemic. The rest of the quarter was moved lower amid expectations for Fed rate cuts while longer-dated tenors rose on marked by equity and bond markets recovering to pre-tariff levels on constructive concerns regarding the longer-term impacts of the proposed federal reconciliation bill. trade negotiations and stable economic data. • The 3-month Treasury was relatively unchanged given no rate cuts from the Fed • Inflation remained relatively benign but is expected to increase in the second half while 2- and 5-year Treasuries fell by 15-16 bps to 3.72% and 3.80% respectively. of the year as tariff-related cost pressures begin to emerge. The timing, extent, and In addition, the 2-year traded over a wide 60 basis point range during the quarter, duration of these pressures are unknown. highlighting the elevated volatility. The 10-year Treasury increased by 2 bps to • The labor market remained healthy though early signs of cooling are emerging, such 4.23% while the 30-year Treasury increased by 16 basis points to 4.78% as as rising initial jobless claims. Continuing claims have also increased, and a slower investors demanded more yield to make investments further out the curve. hiring rate may mean any acceleration in layoffs could result in unemployed workers • Short- and intermediate-duration U.S. Treasury indices generated positive total remaining without a job for longer. Federal job cuts are beginning to flow through the returns for the quarter. The ICE BofA 2-, 5-, and 10-year U.S. Treasury indices data, but severance packages and deferred resignations have delayed the impact on returned 1.11%, 1.66%, and 0.98% for the quarter, while the shorter-duration ICE claims data. However, the reduced pace of population growth, particularly among BofA 3-month U.S. Treasury index returned 1.04%. foreign-born workers, may suggest the economy needs fewer new jobs to keep the unemployment rate stable. Sector Performance • Consumer sentiment remains subdued due to expectations for higher prices and • Excess returns were strong across investment grade sectors as the spread widening weaker labor market conditions as tariffs weigh on the pace of economic growth. experienced in April reversed following trade news and resilient economic data. However, there has been modest improvement from the April lows due to progress on tariff negotiations. A sharp labor market downturn remains the biggest threat to • Federal Agency & supranational spreads remained low throughout Q2. Both sectors consumer spending. produced slightly positive excess returns for the quarter. Issuance remained light and the incremental income from the sectors is near zero. • The Federal Reserve (Fed) left the overnight policy rate unchanged at 4.25% - 4.50%. The Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) “dot plot” continues to suggest 50 • Investment-grade (IG) corporate bond spreads spiked early in the quarter on tariff basis points (bps) in rate cuts by the end of 2025, although there is a divergence of announcements, but as external stressors eased much of the widening retraced. views as eight members are calling for two rate cuts in 2025 and seven are calling for Demand for new issuance remains strong while net issuance is predicted to decrease none. Fed Chair Powell noted the Fed would likely be in a position to begin cutting over the balance of the year. Lower-quality issuers outperformed as did banks and rates again were it not for the unknown impact of tariffs, but the resilient economic other financials. data supports the Fed’s wait-and-see approach. • Asset-backed securities (ABS) spreads retraced over quarter, but to a lesser degree than most other sectors. ABS showed the impact of the slower decrease in spreads Economic Snapshot by posting more modest excess returns over the quarter. We expect the sector to • U.S. inflation moved marginally closer to the Fed’s 2% target, but tariff-driven price continue generating value from carry going forward. pressures may emerge as excess inventories built up before tariffs are depleted. Fed • Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) performance was strong across all structures Chair Powell said that he expects tariffs to impact inflation, but the size, duration, and coupons as rate volatility moderated over the quarter. Likewise, Agency-backed and time of tariff effects are highly uncertain. The year-over-year change in the commercial MBS (CMBS) also posted strong performance for the quarter and saw consumer price index (CPI) stood at 2.4% while core CPI, which excludes the volatile positive excess returns. food and energy components, moved marginally lower but rounded to an unchanged 2.8%. • Short-term credit (commercial paper and negotiable bank CDs) yields on the front end of the yield curve rose slightly in response to the approaching Treasury “X-Date” • U.S. real GDP turned negative in Q1 2025 mainly on the one-off effect of the trade (estimated date for Treasury to exhaust funds under the debt ceiling) while yields fell deficit expanding to the highest level on record as businesses increased imports in modestly on the long end as demand shifted into longer-term Treasury notes. Yield advance of tariffs. Strong inventories and higher fixed investment served as a bit spreads tightened over the quarter in response to moderated issuance and strong of an offset, and a decline in the trade deficit is expected to reverse and support demand. 24 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 4 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 DOVER, CITY OF Market Item Summary 1. Economic Snapshot Labor M arket Latest M ar '25 Jun '24 Unemployment Rate Jun'25 4.1% 4.2% 4.1% Unemployment Rate (left) vs. Change in Nonfarm Payrolls (right) Change In Non-Farm Payrolls Unemployment Rate 5.0% 800K Change In Non-Farm Payrolls Jun'25 147,000 120,000 87,000 4.0% 600K 3.0% Average Hourly Earnings (YoY) Jun'25 3.7% 3.9% 3.9% 400K 2.0% 200K Personal Income (YoY) M ay'25 4.5% 4.7% 5.4% 1.0% 0.0% 0 Initial Jobless Claims (week) 6/ 28/ 25 233,000 219,000 238,000 Jun '22 Dec '22 Jun '23 Dec '23 Jun '24 Dec '24 Jun '25 Growth 1 2 Real GDP (QoQ SAAR) 2025Q1 -0.5% 2.4% 1.6% Real GDP (QoQ) 5% 1 2 4% GDP Personal Consumption (QoQ SAAR) 2025Q1 0.5% 4.0% 1.9% 3% 2% Retail Sales (YoY) M ay'25 3.3% 5.1% 2.0% 1% 0% ISM M anufacturing Survey (month) Jun'25 49.0 49.0 48.3 -1% -2% Existing Home Sales SAAR (month) M ay'25 4.03 mil. 4.02 mil. 3.93 mil. Mar '22 Sep '22 Mar '23 Sep '23 Mar '24 Sep '24 Mar '25 Inflation / Prices Consumer Price Index Personal Consumption Expenditures (YoY) M ay'25 2.3% 2.3% 2.4% CPI (YoY) Core CPI (YoY) 10% Consumer Price Index (YoY) M ay'25 2.4% 2.4% 3.0% 9% 8% 7% 6% Consumer Price Index Core (YoY) M ay'25 2.8% 2.8% 3.3% 5% 4% 3% Crude Oil Futures (WTI, per barrel) Jun 30 $65.11 $71.48 $81.54 2% 1% 0% Jun '22 Dec '22 Jun '23 Dec '23 Jun '24 Dec '24 Gold Futures (oz.) Jun 30 $3,308 $3,123 $2,340 1. Data as of Fourth Quarter 2024. 2. Data as of First Quarter 2024. Note: YoY = year-over-year, QoQ = quarter-over-quarter, SAAR = seasonally adjusted annual rate, WTI = West Texas Intermediate crude oil. Source: Bloomberg Financial L.P. 25 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 5 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 DOVER, CITY OF Market Item Summary 1. Interest Rate Overview U.S. Treasury Note Yields U.S. Treasury Yield Curve 6.0% 6% 5.0% 5% 4% 4.0% 3% Yield 3.0% Yield 2% 1% 2.0% 0% 1.0% 3-yr 2-yr 1-yr 5-yr 7-yr 10-yr 20-yr 30-yr 0.0% 3-mo 6/30/24 9/30/24 12/31/24 3/31/25 6/30/25 Maturity 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year March 31, 2025 June 30, 2025 June 30, 2024 U.S. Treasury Yields Yield Curves as of June 30, 2025 Change over Change over 6% Maturity Jun '25 Mar '25 Jun '24 Quarter Year 5% 3-Month 4.30% 4.30% 0.00% 5.36% (1.06%) 4% 1-Year 3.97% 4.03% (0.06%) 5.12% (1.15%) 3% 2-Year 3.72% 3.89% (0.17%) 4.76% (1.04%) Yield 2% 5-Year 3.80% 3.95% (0.15%) 4.38% (0.58%) 1% 0% 10-Year 4.23% 4.21% 0.02% 4.40% (0.17%) 10-yr 25-yr 30-yr 3-yr 2-yr 5-yr 7-yr 30-Year 4.78% 4.57% 0.21% 4.56% 0.22% 1-yr 3-mo Maturity U.S. Treasury Federal Agency Corporates, A Rated Source: Bloomberg Financial L.P. 26 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 6 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 DOVER, CITY OF Market Item Summary 1. ICE BofA Index Returns As of 06/30/2025 Returns for Periods ended 06/30/2025 June 30, 2025 Duration Yield 3 Month 1 Year 3 Years 1-3 Year Indices U.S. Treasury 1.83 3.79% 1.18% 5.67% 3.41% Federal Agency 1.45 3.85% 1.12% 5.43% 3.53% U.S. Corporates, A-AAA rated 1.84 4.33% 1.40% 6.48% 4.45% Agency MBS (0 to 3 years) 1.91 4.45% 1.25% 5.84% 3.64% Taxable Municipals 1.86 4.14% 1.40% 6.07% 3.82% 1-5 Year Indices U.S. Treasury 2.55 3.77% 1.36% 6.07% 3.23% Federal Agency 2.07 3.83% 1.27% 5.72% 3.42% U.S. Corporates, A-AAA rated 2.64 4.38% 1.69% 7.06% 4.63% Agency MBS (0 to 5 years) 3.07 4.51% 1.67% 7.18% 3.69% Taxable Municipals 2.41 4.28% 1.50% 6.19% 3.65% Master Indices (Maturities 1 Year or Greater) U.S. Treasury 6.10 4.06% 0.76% 5.18% 1.31% Federal Agency 3.33 3.96% 1.30% 5.78% 3.08% U.S. Corporates, A-AAA rated 6.67 4.86% 1.65% 6.64% 3.67% Agency MBS (0 to 30 years) 5.79 4.97% 1.13% 6.42% 2.28% Taxable Municipals 8.81 5.24% 0.72% 4.82% 2.17% Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. Source: ICE BofA Indices. 27 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 7 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 DOVER, CITY OF Market Item Summary 1. Disclosures Indices shown are not available for investment. The index data reference herein is the property of the index provider and/or its licensors. The index provider assumes no liability in connections with its use and does not sponsor, endorse or recommend the products or services contained herein. Index returns do not reflect payment of any sales charges or fees an investor would pay to purchase the securities they represent. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause investment performance to be lower than the performance shown. The views expressed within this material constitute the perspective and judgment of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. at the time of distribution and are subject to change. Any forecast, projection, or prediction of the market, the economy, economic trends, and equity or fixed-income markets are based upon current opinion as of the date of issue and are also subject to change. Opinions and data presented are not necessarily indicative of future events or expected performance. Information contained herein is based on data obtained from recognized statistical services, issuer reports or communications, or other sources, believed to be reliable. No representation is made as to its accuracy or completeness. PFM Asset Management serves clients in the public sector and is a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc., which is the legal entity providing investment advisory services. U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. is a registered investment adviser, a direct subsidiary of U.S. Bank N.A. and an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank N.A. is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services, or performance of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. NOT FDIC INSURED : NO BANK GUARANTEE : MAY LOSE VALUE Further distribution is not permitted without prior written consent. 28 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 8 of 21

Item 1. Portfolio Review: DOVER POOLED INVESTMENT ACCOUNT 29 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 9 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF Portfolio Snapshot Portfolio Snapshot - DOVER POOLED INVESTMENT ACCOUNT¹ Portfolio Statistics Sector Allocation Total Market Value $113,085,929.43 Securities Sub-Total $112,227,266.41 U.S. Treasury | 43% Accrued Interest $784,725.16 Corporate | 40% Agency CMBS | 7% Cash $73,937.86 Supranational | 2% ABS | 2% Portfolio Effective Duration 2.06 years Commercial Paper | 2% Benchmark Effective Duration 2.05 years Municipal | 1% Federal Agency | 1% Yield At Cost 4.14% Agency MBS Pass Through | 1% Negotiable CD | 1% Yield At Market 4.20% Agency CMO | <1% Portfolio Credit Quality AA Credit Quality - S&P Duration Distribution Portf olio Benchmark AAA | 4% AA+ | 51% 30% 27% 25% 27% AA | 2% 24% 25% 23% 22% AA- | 5% A-1+ | 4% 18% 20% 15% A+ | 9% A | 9% 15% 11% A- | 10% 10% 8% A-1 | 1% BBB+ | 4% 5% Not Rated | 2% 0% 0-1 Yr 1-2 Yrs 2-3 Yrs 3-4 Yrs 4-5 Yrs 1. Yield and duration calculations exclude cash and cash equivalents. Sector allocation includes market values and accrued interest. The portfolio’s benchmark is the ICE BofA 0-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index. Source: Bloomberg Financial LP. An average of each security’s credit rating was assigned a numeric value and adjusted for its relative weighting in the portfolio. 2. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. 30 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 10 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF Portfolio Summary Issuer Diversification Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / Fitch Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / Fitch U.S. Treasury 43.2% Corporate 40.4% United States Treasury 43.2% AA / Aa / AA Analog Devices Inc 0.7% A/A/A Federal Agency 1.2% AstraZeneca PLC 0.8% A/A/A Federal Home Loan Banks 0.7% AA / Aa / NR Bank of America Corp 1.9% A / A / AA Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 0.5% AA / Aa / AA Bank of Montreal 0.7% A / A / AA Agency CMBS 6.6% Bank of New York Mellon Corp 0.8% A / Aa / AA Bank of Nova Scotia 0.5% A / A / AA Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 6.6% AA / Aa / AA Bayerische Motoren Werke AG 0.7% A / A / NR Agency CMO 0.3% BlackRock Inc 0.7% AA / Aa / NR Federal National Mortgage Association 0.3% AA / Aa / AA Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 0.5% A / A / NR Agency MBS Pass Through 0.8% Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 0.6% A / A / AA Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 0.2% AA / Aa / AA Charles Schwab Corp 0.4% A/A/A Federal National Mortgage Association 0.5% AA / Aa / AA Cintas Corp 0.3% A / A / NR Supranational 2.3% Cisco Systems Inc 1.5% AA / A / NR Asian Development Bank 2.3% AAA / Aaa / AAA Citigroup Inc 2.1% A/A/A Municipal 1.4% Confederation Nationale du Credit Mutue 0.5% A / A / AA Los Angeles Unified School District/CA 0.2% NR / Aa / AAA Credit Agricole Group 0.5% A / A / AA New York State Dormitory Authority 0.5% AA / NR / AA Cummins Inc 0.0% A / A / NR State Board of Administration Finance C 0.6% AA / Aa / AA Depository Trust & Clearing Corp 1.5% AA / Aa / NR Negotiable CD 0.7% Eli Lilly & Co 0.8% A / Aa / NR Goldman Sachs Group Inc 1.7% A/A/A Groupe BPCE 0.7% A/A/A Groupe BPCE 0.7% A/A/A Commercial Paper 1.5% Hershey Co 0.4% A / A / NR Bank of America Corp 1.5% A / NR / AA Honda Motor Co Ltd 0.7% A / A / NR Corporate 40.4% HSBC Holdings PLC 0.7% A/A/A Accenture PLC 0.3% AA / Aa / A Johnson & Johnson 1.5% AAA / Aaa / NR American Express Co 0.5% A/A/A JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.7% A / A / AA Ratings shown are calculated by assigning a numeral value to each security rating, then calculating a weighted average rating for each security type / issuer category using all available security ratings, excluding Not-Rated (NR) ratings. For security type / issuer categories where a rating from the applicable NRSRO is not available, a rating of NR is assigned. Includes accrued interest and excludes balances invested in overnight funds. 31 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 11 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF Portfolio Summary Issuer Diversification Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / Fitch Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / Fitch Corporate 40.4% ABS 1.6% Kenvue Inc 0.6% A / A / NR Bank of America Corp 0.2% NR / Aaa / AAA Mars Inc 0.4% A / A / NR BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 0.3% AAA / NR / AAA Mercedes-Benz Group AG 0.7% A / A / NR Kubota Credit Owner Trust 0.1% NR / Aaa / AAA Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 0.5% A/A/A Porsche Innovative Lease Owner 0.2% AAA / NR / AAA Morgan Stanley 2.4% A / Aa / AA Verizon Master Trust 0.7% NR / Aaa / AAA National Bank of Canada 0.7% BBB / A / A Total 100.0% National Rural Utilities Cooperative Fi 0.8% A/A/A NatWest Group PLC 0.4% A / A / AA Roche Holding AG 0.6% AA / Aa / AA Sanofi SA 0.7% AA / Aa / NR Siemens AG 0.7% AA / Aa / NR Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB 0.5% A / Aa / AA State Street Corp 1.5% A / Aa / AA Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings Inc 0.7% A / A / NR Svenska Handelsbanken AB 0.7% AA / Aa / AA Swedbank AB 1.5% A / Aa / AA Target Corp 0.1% A/A/A Toronto-Dominion Bank 0.8% A / A / AA Toyota Motor Corp 0.3% A/A/A Truist Financial Corp 0.2% A / Baa / A UBS Group AG 0.2% A / Aa / A United Parcel Service Inc 0.3% A / A / NR United Services Automobile Association 0.3% AA / Aa / NR Wells Fargo & Co 0.1% BBB / A / A Westpac Banking Corp 0.7% AA / A / NR Ratings shown are calculated by assigning a numeral value to each security rating, then calculating a weighted average rating for each security type / issuer category using all available security ratings, excluding Not-Rated (NR) ratings. For security type / issuer categories where a rating from the applicable NRSRO is not available, a rating of NR is assigned. Includes accrued interest and excludes balances invested in overnight funds. 32 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 12 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF Portfolio Characteristics Sector Allocation Review - DOVER POOLED INVESTMENT ACCOUNT Security Type Sep-24 % of Total Dec-24 % of Total Mar-25 % of Total Jun-25 % of Total U.S. Treasury $36.4 33.4% $42.3 39.0% $45.7 41.7% $48.6 43.2% Federal Agency $8.1 7.4% $6.1 5.7% $6.2 5.7% $1.4 1.2% Agency CMBS $8.0 7.3% $7.5 7.0% $7.5 6.9% $7.5 6.7% Agency CMO $0.4 0.3% $0.3 0.3% $0.3 0.3% $0.3 0.3% Agency MBS Pass Through $1.0 0.9% $0.9 0.9% $0.9 0.8% $0.9 0.8% Supranational $0.0 0.0% $2.6 2.4% $2.6 2.4% $2.6 2.4% Municipal $2.4 2.3% $2.5 2.3% $1.2 1.1% $1.5 1.4% Negotiable CD $0.8 0.7% $0.8 0.7% $0.8 0.7% $0.8 0.7% Commercial Paper $6.5 6.0% $6.5 6.1% $3.3 3.0% $1.7 1.5% Corporate $45.3 41.7% $38.5 35.6% $39.9 36.6% $45.3 40.2% ABS $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.8 0.8% $1.8 1.6% Total $108.8 100.0% $108.1 100.0% $109.3 100.0% $112.2 100.0% U.S. Treasury Agency CMBS Agency MBS Pass Through Municipal Negotiable CD Commercial Paper Corporate ABS Federal Agency Agency CMO Supranational $120.0 $120.0 $120.0 $120.0 $96.0 $96.0 $96.0 $96.0 $72.0 $72.0 $72.0 $72.0 Millions $48.0 Millions $48.0 Millions $48.0 Millions $48.0 $24.0 $24.0 $24.0 $24.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 September 2024 December 2024 March 2025 June 2025 Market values, excluding accrued interest. Only includes fixed-income securities held within the separately managed account(s) and LGIPs managed by PFMAM. Detail may not add to total due to rounding. 33 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 13 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF Portfolio Characteristics Historical Sector Allocation - DOVER POOLED INVESTMENT ACCOUNT 1% 2% 37% 40% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 7% 7% 6% 1% 42% 43% Mar-25 Jun-25 Only includes fixed-income securities held within the separately managed account(s) and LGIPs managed by PFMAM. 34 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 14 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF Portfolio Activity Portfolio Activity - DOVER POOLED INVESTMENT ACCOUNT Net Activity by Sector ($ millions) Sector Net Activity Corporate Corporate Corporate $4,938,194 U.S. Treasury $2,538,152 U.S. Treasury U.S. Treasury ABS $934,956 ABS ABS Municipal $265,000 Agency CMO ($11,464) Municipal Municipal Agency CMBS ($32,980) Agency CMO Agency CMO Agency MBS Pass Through ($50,189) Agency CMBS Agency CMBS Commercial Paper ($1,675,000) Federal Agency ($4,825,000) Agency MBS Pass Agency MBS Pass Through Through Total Net Activity $2,081,671 Commercial Paper Commercial Paper Federal Agency Federal Agency ($10.0) ($5.0) $0.0 $5.0 $10.0 $15.0 Sales/Maturities Purchases Based on total proceeds (principal and accrued interest) of buys, sells, maturities, and principal paydowns. Detail may not add to total due to rounding. 35 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 15 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF Portfolio Performance Portfolio Performance Portfolio Benchmark 8.0% 6.0% Return 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 3 Months 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years Total Return² 3 Months 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years¹ Portfolio 1.52% 6.47% 4.20% 1.81% 2.11% Benchmark³ 1.28% 5.80% 3.53% 1.31% 1.71% Difference 0.24% 0.67% 0.67% 0.50% 0.40% 1. The lesser of 10 years or since inception is shown. Since inception returns for periods one year or less are not shown. Performance inception date is September 30, 2011. 2. Returns for periods one year or less are presented on a periodic basis. Returns for periods greater than one year are presented on an annualized basis. 3. The portfolio’s benchmark is the ICE BofA 0-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index. Source: Bloomberg Financial LP. 36 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 16 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF 2013 DSRF Dover’s Debt Service Reserve Funds • The City’s 2013 debt service reserve portfolio is invested in U.S. Treasury and Federal Agency Notes. Effective Duration Q2 2025 Market Value Yield at Cost (years) 2013 Debt Service Reserve Fund $1,323,397 2.17 3.44% Effective Duration Q1 2025 Market Value Yield at Cost (years) 2013 Debt Service Reserve Fund $1,322,686 2.38 3.44% Data as of March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025. Market value includes accrued interest. Market value excludes cash balance. 37 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 17 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF Appendix Important Disclosures This material is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or a specific recommendation, as it was prepared without regard to any specific objectives or financial circumstances. PFMAM professionals have exercised reasonable professional care in the preparation of this performance report. Information in this report is obtained from sources external to PFMAM and is generally believed to be reliable and available to the public; however, we cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness or suitability. We rely on the client's custodian for security holdings and market values. Transaction dates reported by the custodian may differ from money manager statements. While efforts are made to ensure the data contained herein is accurate and complete, we disclaim all responsibility for any errors that may occur. References to particular issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be recommendations or advice regarding such issuers. Fixed income manager and index characteristics are gathered from external sources. When average credit quality is not available, it is estimated by taking the market value weights of individual credit tiers on the portion of the strategy rated by a NRSRO. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. The index returns shown throughout this material do not represent the results of actual trading of investor assets. Third-party providers maintain the indices shown and calculate the index levels and performance shown or discussed. Index returns do not reflect payment of any sales charges or fees an investor would pay to purchase the securities they represent. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause investment performance to be lower than the performance shown. The views expressed within this material constitute the perspective and judgment of PFMAM at the time of distribution and are subject to change. Any forecast, projection, or prediction of the market, the economy, economic trends, and equity or fixed-income markets are based upon certain assumptions and current opinion as of the date of issue and are also subject to change. Some, but not all assumptions are noted in the report. Assumptions may or may not be proven correct as actual events occur, and results may depend on events outside of your or our control. Changes in assumptions may have a material effect on results. Opinions and data presented are not necessarily indicative of future events or expected performance. PFM Asset Management serves clients in the public sector and is a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc., which is the legal entity providing investment advisory services. U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. is a registered investment adviser, a direct subsidiary of U.S. Bank N.A. and an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank N.A. is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services, or performance of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. The information contained is not an offer to purchase or sell any securities. Additional applicable regulatory information is available upon request. For more information regarding PFMAM's services or entities, please visit www.pfmam.com. Further distribution is not permitted without prior written consent. 38 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 18 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF Appendix Important Disclosures Generally, PFMAM’s market prices are derived from closing bid prices as of the last business day of the month as supplied by ICE Data Services. There may be differences in the values shown for investments due to accrued but uncollected income and the use of differing valuation sources and methods. Non-negotiable FDIC-insured bank certificates of deposit are priced at par. Although PFMAM believes the prices to be reliable, the values of the securities may not represent the prices at which the securities could have been bought or sold. Explanation of the valuation methods for a registered investment company or local government investment program is contained in the appropriate fund offering documentation or information statement. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, information is presented on a trade date basis; forward settling purchases are included in the monthly balances, and forward settling sales are excluded. Performance is presented in accordance with the CFA Institute's Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). Unless otherwise noted, performance is shown gross of fees. Quarterly returns are presented on an unannualized basis. Returns for periods greater than one year are presented on an annualized basis. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. ICE Bank of America Indices provided by Bloomberg Financial Markets. Money market fund/cash balances are included in performance and duration computations. Standard & Poor's is the source of the credit ratings. Distribution of credit rating is exclusive of money market fund/LGIP holdings. Callable securities in the portfolio are included in the maturity distribution analysis to their stated maturity date, although, they may be called prior to maturity. MBS maturities are represented by expected average life. 39 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 19 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF Appendix Glossary Accrued Interest: Interest that is due on a bond or other fixed income security since the last interest payment was made. Agencies: Federal agency securities and/or Government-sponsored enterprises. Amortized Cost: The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date until the date of the report. Discount or premium with respect to short-term securities (those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance) is amortized on a straight line basis. Such discount or premium with respect to longer-term securities is amortized using the constant yield basis. Asset-Backed Security: A financial instrument collateralized by an underlying pool of assets – usually ones that generate a cash flow from debt, such as loans, leases, credit card balances, and receivables. Bankers’ Acceptance: A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill as well as the insurer. Commercial Paper: An unsecured obligation issued by a corporation or bank to finance its short-term credit needs, such as accounts receivable and inventory. Contribution to Total Return: The weight of each individual security multiplied by its return, then summed for each sector to determine how much each sector added or subtracted from the overall portfolio performance. Effective Duration: A measure of the sensitivity of a security’s price to a change in interest rates, stated in years. Effective Yield: The total yield an investor receives in relation to the nominal yield or coupon of a bond. Effective yield takes into account the power of compounding on investment returns, while nominal yield does not. FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. A federal agency that insures bank deposits to a specified amount. Interest Rate: Interest per year divided by principal amount and expressed as a percentage. Market Value: The value that would be received or paid for an investment in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Maturity: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit: A CD with a very large denomination, usually $1 million or more, that can be traded in secondary markets. Par Value: The nominal dollar face amount of a security. Pass-through Security: A security representing pooled debt obligations that passes income from debtors to its shareholders. The most common type is the mortgage-backed security. 40 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 20 of 21

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Item 1. DOVER, CITY OF Appendix Glossary Repurchase Agreements: A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. Settle Date: The date on which the transaction is settled and monies/securities are exchanged. If the settle date of the transaction (i.e., coupon payments and maturity proceeds) occurs on a non-business day, the funds are exchanged on the next business day. Supranational: A multinational union or association in which member countries cede authority and sovereignty on at least some internal matters to the group, whose decisions are binding on its members. Trade Date: The date on which the transaction occurred; however, the final consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place. Unsettled Trade: A trade which has been executed; however, the final consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place. U.S. Treasury: The department of the U.S. government that issues Treasury securities. Yield: The rate of return based on the current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the time period remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis. YTM at Cost: The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return based on the original cost, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the time period from purchase date to maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis. YTM at Market: The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return based on the current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the time period remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis. 41 PFM Asset Management | pfmam.com Page 21 of 21

Item 2. CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole (Leg & Fin) DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Water & Wastewater SUBMITTED ON: August 29, 2025 PREPARED BY: Jason A. Lyon, P.E., Director of Water & Wastewater / Engineering Services REVIEWED BY: David S. Hugg, III, City Manager and Patricia M. Marney, Controller / Treasurer SUBJECT: Change Order – Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvements TIMETABLE: Notice to proceed to be issued within seven (7) days of Council approval. RELATED PROJECT: X REFERENCE: X EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $151,180.00 AVAILABLE BUDGET: $40,276.27 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Department of Public Works – Streets – Meeting House Branch Improvements, Project No. ST2003, Account No.: 101-12-18-35-000- 54030. Shortfall to be covered by SW2502 – Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvements, Project No. SW2502, Account No.: 101-12-18- 60-000-54031 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval from City Council of the proposed amendments to the engineering design scope by the consulting firms to complete design of this project. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: In the summer of 2022, AECOM was awarded a contract to complete engineering design work for the Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project. As this design was moving forward, various unforeseen items came up to complicate the project. This included the potential of creating a park on the property, which required a closed pipe design (instead of the originally designed open channel). Additionally, the city worked with Bayhealth to assure their future master plan did not conflict with our design. A third item was the requirement of wetland jurisdiction from DNREC. A fourth item included our consultant unsuccessfully locating a critical underground pipe that must be precisely designed to avoid any issues during construction. Finally, our environmental consultant, Compliance Environmental, provided a proposal to finalize the required DNREC feasibility study and provide additional support during excavation. 42

Item 2. Change Total Cumulative Change Date Description Order Project Order % against Amount Budget Original Budget 7/25/22 AECOM Contract Approved n/a $250,000 n/a 2/7/23 Agreement Amendment #1 – Hydraulic $7,000 $257,000 2.8% Model 5/22/23 Agreement Amendment #2 – Bayhealth $12,000 $269,000 7.6% Evaluation 5/22/23 Agreement Amendment #3 – Cost $1,500 $270,500 8.2% Comparison 6/2/23 Agreement Amendment #4 – Design of $9,000 $279,500 11.8% Culvert 10/18/24 Agreement Amendment #6 – $20,000 $299,500 19.8% Geotechnical Investigation n/a Proposed - Agreement Amendment #7 – $10,500 $310,000 24.0% Wetland Jurisdiction n/a Proposed - Compliance Environmental $99,980 $409,980 63.9% Inc. – Feasibility Study et. al. n/a Propossed – AECOM Subconsultant - $40,700 $450,680 80.2% Level A – Geophysical Services The shortfall will be covered by the following breakdown: Funding Description Current Spent / Savings / Requested Proposed Source Budget Encumbered Remaining Change Budget Remaining General ST2003 $266,000 $225,723.73 $40,276.27 $110,903.73 $74,000 Meeting House Branch Improvements General SW2502 $1,250,000 $0 $1,250,000 ($110,903.73) $1,139,096.27 Meeting House Drainage Improvements City staff recommend the authorization of the proposed amendments to complete the design of the Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project. 43

ACTION FORM Item 4. PROCEEDING: City Council Approval DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Information Technology DATE SUBMITTED: 8/25/2025 PREPARED BY: Joseph Simmons. Information Technology Director SUBJECT: SLCGP Cybersecurity Grants – Budget Amendment Request REFERENCE: RELATED PROJECT: REVIEWED BY: David S. Hugg, III, City Manager and Patricia M. Marney, Controller / Treasurer EXHIBITS: EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $316,000.00 AMOUNT BUDGETED: $0 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): IT Budget TIMETABLE: Completion by 2027 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the following grants that total $316,000 through the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency: SLCGP-23-1157, SLCGP-23-1158, SLCGP-23-1159, SLCGP-23-1160, and SLCGP-23-1161. The work performed by these grants will aid us in upgrading our infrastructure to better protect our system and network by enhancing security, and to update plans for best practices and Continuity of Operations. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The State of Delaware, through the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), has made available funds to improve the cybersecurity posture of municipalities, counties, and state agencies through a grant program. The city has been approved, and funding is available for a series of projects that were submitted. There is no cost share needed for these grants. These projects have been reviewed and approved by a State and Local Cybersecurity Grant committee, DEMA, CISA, and FEMA. They address areas that have been identified as improvements in various parts of our IT infrastructure. The plans are: SLCGP-23-1157-S: Cyber Resilience and Business Continuity Project ($170,000) The purpose of this project is to establish a framework and system that allows the City of Dover to continue critical operations in the face of disruptions, whether due to cyberattacks, phishing and social engineering attacks, ransomware infections, distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, advanced persistent threats, or other incidents. This project aims to reduce the amount of time the City of Dover's operations are affected by incidents, particularly those that threaten digital infrastructure, while safeguarding the city's data against threats that may compromise its confidentiality, integrity, and availability, ensuring that it can be accessed and used when needed. The scope of the project is to procure an on-site and cloud-based system for providing regular data backups, secure storage of backups (both on-site and off-site), and redundant hardware to ensure data can be restored quickly after an incident. In particular, to address failures in critical hardware systems (servers, networking equipment), inadequate backup storage capacity that can disrupt business continuity that could result in service disruptions and data loss. SLCGP-23-1158-S: ($29,000) Security, Compliance, and Identity Training ($20,000). Effective cybersecurity is the foundation for managing and securing an organization's identities, devices, apps, data, and infrastructure. Learn by doing hands-on exercises, training courses, and live classes that provide foundational and advanced- level knowledge on security, compliance, and identity concepts and related cloud-based and on-site security tools 44

and solutions. The purpose is to train the City of Dover IT staff on Microsoft and other security, compliance, and Item 4. identity solutions to provide a holistic and end-to-end security solution in the solution Microsoft 365 environment. This training will include the basic concepts of security, compliance, and identity of Microsoft identity and access management solutions, along with identifying and implementing compliance capabilities in Microsoft AD, and it connected identity technologies. This training includes identity content for enterprise application registration, conditional access, identity governance, and other identity tools. SLCGP-23-1159-S: Transition domain to .GOV from DOVER.DE.US ($20,000). Our current Dover.DE.US domain name is outdated, and since technically owned by the State of Delaware, getting certificates requires authorization from the state and causes delays in the certificate renewal process. Email and identity phishing campaigns are becoming more prevalent and are increasingly more elaborate. However, it can be difficult to know whether someone communicating via email is who they say they are, or that they really represent their purported government entity. The .gov is identified as a secure domain name that shows government websites and emails for the City of Dover adhere to the highest standards in data protection. SLCGP-23-1160-S: IT-OT Network Security ($87,000). Our Public Works and Electrical Departments' Operational Technology (OT) Infrastructure is the backbone of services provided to our communities, but it lags behind in software and hardware upgrades, needing to support modern cybersecurity tools and solutions. Critical infrastructure is targeted as one of the core areas for funding, addressing these shortcomings to protect against cybersecurity attacks. The importance of a secure infrastructure system within our OT network, like scanning and monitoring tools, updated hardware, and proper communication and network segregation, will help in protecting these critical assets. SLCGP-23-1161-S Cybersecurity Incident Plan Update - Phase 2 ($19,000). This project is phase two of the previous year's award grant (SLCGP-22-0976: Cybersecurity Incident Plan Update ($20,000)). This grant will complete the review and update our existing plans and policies, and detail a comprehensive and best practice guideline-compliant document. 45

Item 5. ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole - Legislative, Finance and Admin. Committee DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Manager and HR DATE SUBMITTED: 9/3/2025 PREPARED BY: David S. Hugg III SUBJECT: Non-bargaining Step Proposal Discussion REFERENCE: RELATED PROJECT: REVIEWED BY: City Manager and HR Director EXHIBITS: #1 - Discussion Paper, #2 - Examples of Compression and #3 - HR Director Wage Compression Recommendation EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: n/a AMOUNT BUDGETED: n/a FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): n/a TIMETABLE: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Discussion and Direction for staff BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Non-bargaining employees (those not represented by a union) traditionally receive a flat annual adjustment to their compensation as part of the budget preparation action. In recent years that increase was 3% and most recently set at 4%. This is significantly below the increases built into the various union scales as a result of both an annual adjustment of the pay scale and the award of an annual step in grade. These increases were around 7% depending on the union contract. This disparity results in what is known as “wage compression”, as discussed in the attached exhibits. Wage compression can result in reduced morale and retention, and difficulty filling managerial jobs. Staff wish to address this issue during the current Fiscal Year and as we go forward into the subsequent budget cycle which will commence this fall. There are two documents attached for committee consideration: a discussion paper drafted by the City Manager and a response with different options prepared by the HR Director. Input from the Council and Committee is desired so that the proposal can be more fully developed and possibly implemented as early as January 2026. 46

Item 5. Exhibit #1 DRAFT Discussion Paper for consideration by the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee Wage Compression- A Significant and Growing Concern for Dover Salaried and hourly (union represented) experience two different compensation structures. Salaried employment provides a fixed, predictable income, while hourly paid employment fluctuates based on hours worked, potentially including overtime. Salaried positions often come with benefits like health insurance and paid time off, while hourly employees may have more ability to earn overtime pay. Wage (or pay compression) occurs when there is little difference in pay between employees with varying levels of experience, skills, or seniority. This often happens when new hires are brought in at salaries close to or higher than those of long-tenured employees, or when the pay for lower-level positions approaches that of higher-level ones, especially when the differences between levels are too small to be meaningful. It also happens where there are union contract scales and steps that vary significantly compared to a non-union formula. It may occur when two otherwise comparable jobs are treated differently due to eligibility for union coverage (as a result of differing access to confidential records, for example). In some cases, this can even result in wage inversion , whereby new employees earn more than older, more experienced ones or when contracted increases move up faster over time than budgeted ones. Wage inversion opens up the door for a discrimination claim, especially if the individual earning less than the new hire is part of a protected class of worker based on gender, race, sexual orientation, age, or other underrepresented group. The employee has an opportunity to claim pay discrimination. Wage compression can be the result of external factors like minimum wage increases or a tight labor market or internal issues, such as a failure to keep pace with fair market pay. The negative impacts of Wage Compression hurt culture and employee morale, promoting a sense of unfairness at work, which may lead to an a decision to leave the city, or view the pay discrepancy as discriminatory. It encourages turnover and affects human capital, leading an enterprise to lose long-standing employees, who are often some of their best employees, and as noted above create grounds for litigation. 47

Item 5. Exhibit #1 Often employees represented by unions benefit as a result of a fixed automatic compensation increase, often combining a general wage increase for all positions (maybe inflation adjusted) plus an advancement (step-increase) in grade as a function of tenure. Salaried employees typically don’t get both. In Dover, in recent years union contract combined increases have averaged near 7%. In this same period, non-bargaining increases have ranged between 2% and 4% (current budget year is 4%) with no step or longevity increases. Benefits and other forms of added compensation are essentially the same for all employees except for the opportunity to work overtime. In many instances union employees may reach or exceed the compensation of a non- bargaining manager or supervisor where skills or education do not support the outcome. In some instances, employees tend to decline promotion to a managerial level because of the small difference in compensation, the benefits of a contract scale, and the ability to earn more with the benefit of overtime or special duty pay (1.5 to 2.0 x regular rate). Union representation provides many desired benefits such as predictability, job protection, added compensation, stronger grievance provisions, and built-in pay increases. But the desire for representation shouldn’t be to the detriment of those not represented, at least as it relates to fair compensation. EXAMPLES* - The following examples (See table) demonstrate the impact of wage compression or inversion, projected two years in the future. First example – equal positions but unequal compensation due to union contracted scale. Non-bargaining budgeted increases do not keep pace. The difference in current compensation is probably due to longevity. Because non-bargaining employees in this class have access to sensitive data, they are not union eligible. Second, third and fourth examples -reflects the cumulative effect of different percentages – plays out in subsequent years. They also demonstrate the manager/supervisor to employee relationship where employee closes in or exceeds manager’s compensation. The impact is exacerbated in future years. Fifth and sixth examples – these are examples of supervision of employees with specialized skills or credentials; the delta grows disproportionately (constantly widening spread) leading toa form of wage inversion. It's pretty common for technically skilled employees to make more than their managers in many industries. A skilled employee is typically compensated based on their specific, valuable skills, certification and knowledge, while a manager's compensation includes pay for taking on responsibilities, accountability, and leadership. Salary is about market value theoretically. If a manager is managing someone 48

Item 5. Exhibit #1 who’s highly technical with a rare skill set, then the manager should expect the employee’s salary to be independent of theirs. Prior to the consideration of the FY26 budget, Naomi Poole, HR Director, raised this concern in June in response to a compensation adjustment in the Police Department. Her original proposal**: What other Non-Bargaining Positions are involved? The 9% spread for the Chief and the Major do not impact the other non-bargaining employees. It is my assessment that pay equity amongst all non-bargaining employees should be comparable if not better than the other negotiated union contracts so that we can limit the impact of pay compression. Maintaining a 4% increase will continue to create a huge lag in pay equity and will increase the probability of union employees’ ability to make more than the non-bargaining employees that supervise them. My suggestion by no means is a permanent resolve, as that will take more resources and discussion, but merely a recommendation to keep non- bargaining pay scales above water. What would this cost to implement? With the help of my HR team, and Trish, we created a FY26 non-bargaining pay scale to include the average percentage that union employees are set to receive FY26. The average increase is 7%, and the non-bargaining scale reflects just that. The total additional cost added to the approved 4% non-bargaining increase will be approximately $130,448.35. I have included a spreadsheet with a full breakdown of how we arrived at the estimated amount. How soon can we act on the recommendations? My recommendations are certainly a change from what was already projected and approved for FY26. The changes would need approval, and once approved, my team and I can implement those changes for the July 1st increase as planned. Time is of the essence because HR would need an appropriate amount of time to build the new scale in Tyler. **Note: These recommendations were not deemed timely enough to become part of the FY26 budget. However, the Council President and the Chair of the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee requested that the issue be discussed further, with the possibility a mid-year correction. RECOMMENDATIONS: Any additional compensation during FY26 would require analysis to identify additional funding. Assuming that some additional funding is available, a short-term solution is to 49

Item 5. Exhibit #1 increase non-bargaining compensation by approximately 3% for the second half of the fiscal year (at a projected added cost of about $65,000 – this needs to be confirmed). Longer term considerations include creating a two-part salary adjustment for non- bargaining positions with a fixed base adjustment (4%-5%) and a second part based on some index (perhaps CPI) . Simply mirroring the average percentage increase granted to unionized civilian employees each year putting all employees on a level basis. Additionally, schedule a regular wage study for non-bargaining positions no less often that every 3- 5 year to reflect fair market conditions. Make necessary adjustments to base compensation. Finally, carefully identify those circumstances where an employee’s credentials, special skills, training, certifications/licensing, etc. support a wage exceeding the regular compensation structure and for those determine a market scale separate from practice. DSH Revised 8/30 (See also additional comments from HR Director Poole – separate document/email) 50

Item 5. Exhibit #2 Examples of compression: Assumptions: • Non-bargaining employees receive an additional 4% each year. • Union employees* (second number in each case) receive the increase assumed by contract of an additional 7% each year (average for illustration). • Does not adjust for longevity or maximum range. • Difference is non-bargaining amoumt over or below union (annualized). • Illustrative only. Now +Year 1 +Year 2 Admin, Assistant (NB) +4% $42,494 $44,194 $45,962 Admin. Assistant* +7% $45,739 $48,941 $52,367 Difference ($3,245) ($4,747) ($6,405) Assist Library Director (NB) +4% $79,518 $82,698 $86,007 Librarian II* +7% $75,296 $80,566 $86,206 Difference $4,222 $2,132 ($199) Code Enforcement, Mgr.(NB )+4% $69,364 $72,034 $74,915 Code Inspector II* +7% $67,392 $72,109 $77,156 Difference $1,972 ($75) ($2,241) P&R Director (NB) +4% $87.454 $90,952 $94,580 Recreation Specialist* +7% $82,492 $88,266 $94,445 Difference $4,620 $2,686 $135 Facilities Manager (NB) +4% $82,547 $85,849 $89,283 Electrician II* +7% $87,922 $94,087 $100,673 Difference ($5.375) ($8,238) ($11,390) Electric Director (NB) +4% $137,363 $142,857 $148,571 Engineer* +7% $138,424 $148,114 $158,482 Difference ($1,061) ($5,527) ($9,911) *Note: these examples are based on actual conditions, however some of the comparisons could be distorted because of longevity. They are intended to demonstrate the impacts of wage compression if extrapolated two years into the future at the 4% and 7% rates. 51

Item 5. Exhibit #3 Wage Compression Recommendation: There has been no radical change in positions and the job market that would otherwise require a market study. However, following the last civilian wage study, a comparable non- bargaining pay scale should have been implemented. Current compression issues are internal and largely due to inequities between unionized and non-unionized positions. Recommendation 1. Adjustment to Pay Increases o Instead of applying a 3% increase, non-bargaining employees should receive a total 6% increase to account for FY25 and FY26. o This mirrors increases granted to civilian unionized employees and places non-bargaining employees on a level playing field. o It also provides an opportunity to incorporate a new non-bargaining scale moving forward. 2. Cost of Living and Step Scale o A combined adjustment totaling 7% should be considered (4% cost of living + 3% step increase). o With each civilian negotiation cycle, the non-bargaining scale should be recalibrated to accommodate percentage changes, ensuring fairness and consistency. 3. Compression and Equity o Implementing a scale consistent with unionized employees will help reduce inequities and address compression concerns. o Supervisory positions, though smaller in number per the report I shared with you, should also be reviewed to ensure alignment. This recommendation should be fully costed by Finance. The non-bargaining pay scale must be rebuilt to reflect these changes so that the FY26 structure incorporates the adjustments that should have been made if a FY25 scale had originally been established for non-bargaining employees. To achieve equity, mitigate compression, and align with unionized pay practices, it is recommended that the City implement a 6% increase (spanning FY25 and FY26) for non- bargaining employees. Finance should rebuild the pay scale accordingly to ensure long- term alignment. This approach will at minimum bring civilian non-bargaining employees into parity with their unionized counterparts while providing a sustainable framework for future adjustments. 52

Item 6. ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole – Legislative, Finance and Admin. Committee DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Manager DATE SUBMITTED: 9/3/2025 PREPARED BY: David Hugg SUBJECT: Review of Application for the Economic Development Fund REFERENCE: RELATED PROJECT: REVIEWED BY: David Hugg EXHIBITS: Draft Application EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: n/a AMOUNT BUDGETED: n/a FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): n/a TIMETABLE: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and revise as needed and approve. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The City established an Economic Development Fund to promote projects that enhance the city’s economy. The Resolution creating the fund reads”: “The Mayor and City Council seek to set aside funds for economic development and community development projects to include opportunities to improve the city’s economy and quality of life. An economic development project will constitute a program or activity having the primary purpose of encouraging the establishment and growth of business in the city, including the creation and retention of jobs (Res. 2024-15, adopted October 29, 2024). The purpose of the Economic and Community Development funds will be for the use of programs, policies, or activities that seek to improve the economic well-being and quality of life for the residents of the City of Dover. Funds may be used for land or building acquisition, building renovation, matching funds for related grants, incentives associated with new or expanded businesses, workforce training and development, upfront and administrative costs associated with the issuance of conduit or TIF bonds, blight removal, or other purposes consistent with the economic development fund purposes.” As grants from this fund will benefit qualifying private parties, a rigorous application process is desired to ensure that the use of such funds has a high probability for success in its goals and has a lasting impact on achievement of the city’s economic development strategies and plans. The action requested is further discussion and input on the application process and requirements. 53

Item 6. APPLICATION FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND GRANT Version 8/26/2025 Purpose Statement: The “Mayor and City Council seek to set aside funds for economic development and community development projects to include opportunities to improve the city’s economy and quality of life. An economic development project will constitute a program or activity having the primary purpose of encouraging the establishment and growth of business in the city, including the creation and retention of jobs (Res. 2024-15, adopted October 29, 2024). The purpose of the Economic Development Fund will be for the use of programs, policies, or activities that seek to improve the economic well-being and quality of life for the residents of the City of Dover. Funds may be used for land or building acquisition, building renovation, matching funds for related grants, incentives associated with new or expanded businesses, workforce training and development, upfront and administrative costs associated with the issuance of conduit or TIF bonds, blight removal, or other purposes consistent with the economic development fund purposes. Grant cycle: applications may be submitted at any time and are subject to the availability of funds. Only 1 (one) grant will be awarded to the same applicant in any 12-month period. All applications must be sponsored by a councilmember and meet the criteria listed below: Applicant: Date of application_____________________ Received by City Clerk____________________ Applicant name ________________________________EIN #__________________________ Project Title:__________________________________________________________________ Project physical address (in the City of Dover)________________________________________ A project located outside city limits may be considered but must demonstrate a primary benefit to Dover residents. Council Sponsor (signature)______________________________________________________ Designation of Program/project Manager: include contact individual’s Name ___________________________________________________________________________ Address __________________________________________________________________________, 54

Item 6. Title _____________________________________________________ Phone number___________________________________________ Email ___________________________________________________ Proof of authority to submit application on behalf of applicant (attachment – must be submitted by an authorized representative of the applicant) Proof of non-profit status- (501c) or other non-profit status (attachment – must include latest IRS determination) Proof of operation for 2 ( two) years or more (attachment – annual reports, grant award letters, audits or similar documents) Joint Ventures: An applicant may be part of a joint venture with a for-profit entity who will not be eligible to receive Community Development Fund dollars. The same information must be provided as required of the applicant. Project description (500 words maximum) o Location map and street address of project o Zoning confirmation obtained from city Planning Department o Need demonstrating impact and value to City of Dover residents o Beneficiaries (immediate and long term) o Permission to use private property, if applicable o Statistics, photos, documents, supporting need The timeline for completion, a project must be completed not more than one year after application approval; an extension of up to one additional year may be granted at the discretion of the Parks, Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee. Project budget (explain all amounts): o Personnel costs__________________________ o Materials and supplies___________________ o Other funds (and source)_________________ o Miscellaneous___________________________ o Amount requested_______________________ (not to exceed $20,000) • Total_______________________ Sources and amounts of other funding __________________________________________ Dispersal and Reimbursement of Funds: Reporting; Audit; Clawback: 55

Item 6. (a) Invoicing for reimbursement: o Reimbursements require a written progress report and an invoice requesting reimbursement to be sent to the Department of Finance. o Receipts are required for all purchases or expenditures of more than $50, regardless of the method of payment of amount. o Timesheets or similar records are required with each personnel request. o Reimbursement will be no more often than once every two months (60days). o Reimbursement requires approval by the Controller/Treasurer and City Manager. o Payment will be by City check payable within 30 days to the applicant’s business account or by direct deposit. (b) Closeout and Final Reporting: o A final report including a financial statement is required within 60 days of the completion or termination of the project. o Twenty (20%) percent of the award will be held pending acceptance of the final report. o The city reserves the right to request a return of all or part of the funds if there is any evidence of fraud or misuse of any portion of the funds, and to disqualify the applicant with further funding. o Expenditures shall be subject to audit by the city at any time. Other Provisions and Restrictions: o Funds provided through this grant may be used as a local contribution or match regardless of source, provided such a match is authorized in writing by other funding sources. o Employees, elected officials, and others having direct financial dealings with the city are prohibited from benefitting from this fund. o Letters of support from community leaders and others who have knowledge of the applicant may be submitted (maximum of 4). Applications must be made on such forms and in accordance with such instructions as are prescribed by the City and include all forms and questionnaires as may be applicable to the specific proposed activity. A staff report will be prepared on each application that will at a minimum include the following: a certification that the application/applicant has met all applicable threshold requirements; certification that the proposed budget represents a realistic/ reasonable budget; conformance of the proposed activities to the goals and objectives of the Fund’s purpose; and an evaluation of the applicant’s capacity, and past performance, if relevant. All applications and the staff report will be considered by the Parks, Recreation and Community 56

Item 6. Enhancement Committee at a regularly scheduled meeting during which a public workshop will be conducted. An oral presentation by the applicant to the Committee is a factor in the final decision. Date and location of scheduled meeting and required public workshop (set by the City Clerk)_________________________________________________ Submit applications to: Attention: City Clerk, City of Dover P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19904 One signed original copy shall be submitted to the City Clerk’s Office electronically: two printed copies shall also be submitted. Signature of Authorized Applicant_ ___________________ Date ______________________ 57