CCW Packet REVISED

Council Committee of the Whole. Apr 12, 2022.

This text was pulled from the PDF automatically and may contain mistakes. The PDF is the official record, so check it before relying on this.

47 pages have little or no readable text here, often scans or drawings. See the PDF for those.

Page 1

CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers, 15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, Delaware AGENDA THE AGENDA AND PAPERLESS PACKET FOR THIS MEETING HAVE BEEN REVISED TO INCLUDE MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR ITEM #15 EXTENSION OF THE AMBULANCE SERVICE CONTRACT DATED JANUARY 22, 2019 Public comments are welcomed on any item and will be permitted at the appropriate time. When possible, please notify the City Clerk (302-736-7008 or email at cityclerk@dover.de.us) should you wish to be recognized. VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE This meeting will be held in City Hall Council Chambers with electronic access via WebEx. Public participation information is as follows: Dial: 1-408-418-9388 Link: https://rb.gy/mbd7hq Event number: 2343 851 1269 Event password: DOVER (if needed) If you are new to WebEx, get the app now at https://www.webex.com/ to be ready when the meeting starts. CALL COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING TO ORDER PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 1. Annual Report - Silver Lake Commission (Staff recommendation: Acceptance of the Annual Report) 1

Page 2

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING - April 12, 2022 PAGE 2 2. Review of Active Recreation Area Plan and Consideration of Cash-in-Lieu of Active Recreation Construction - McKee Road Apartments at 1385 McKee Road (Planning Reference #S-21-11) (Dawn Melson-Williams, Interim Planning and Community Development Director) Review of a Site Development Application for the construction of sixteen (16) 10,000 SF garden style apartment buildings each containing twenty-four (24) units for a total of 384 apartment units. Also proposed are sixteen (16) garage buildings, a Club House with Pool, walking paths, picnic areas, a dog park, playing field, parking, and other site improvements. The property is zoned RG- 2 (General Residence Zone) and C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). This development application is only for the residential zoned portion of the property. The commercial portion will be developed under separate application. The property is located on the east side of McKee Road near the intersection of McKee Road and Scarborough Road. The owner of record is McKee Cap, LLC. Property Address: 1385 McKee Road. Tax Parcel: ED-05-067.00-02-57.00-000. Council District 4. Review of Active Recreation Area Plan with Consideration of Fee-in-lieu of Active Recreation Area Construction. Waiver Requests: Partial Elimination of Upright Curbing, Reduction of Required Parking, and the Elimination of Sidewalk along the Public Street Frontage. 3. Strategies to Address Food Deserts in the City (Nikko Brady, Nicole Minni, and Karen Shore, Delaware Department of Agriculture) (Committee Action Not Required) 4. Proposed Categorization of Williams Park and Division and Kirkwood Streets Park as Safe Haven Parks in the City of Dover (Councilman Andre Boggerty and Councilwoman Trish Arndt) (Recommendation: Approval of categorizing Williams Park and Division and Kirkwood Streets Park as Safe Haven Parks) MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS 5. Council President Sudler 6. First District 7. Second District 8. Third District 9. Fourth District 10. At-Large 11. Mayor Christiansen ADJOURNMENT OF THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING 2

Page 3

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING - April 12, 2022 PAGE 3 LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 12. Evaluation of Proposals - SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) Equipment and Technology Upgrade (Paul Waddell, Electric Director) (Staff recommendation: Purchasing the SCADA Master software from Survalent and utilizing IT department to purchase the required hardware) 13. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application Review (Tracey Harvey, CBDG Program Manager) (Staff recommendation: Award $300,000 in CDBG funds to sub-grantees to carry out approved CDBG activities) 14. Consideration of Draft House Bill - City of Dover Charter Amendment (Representative Sean Lynn) 15. Extension of the Ambulance Service Contract dated January 22, 2019 (David S. Hugg III, City Manager) (Staff recommendation: Authorizing the City Manager the right to extend the contract term by one year under the Original Agreement signed on January 22, 2019, XVII. Terms, Review, Termination, and Assignment, Section B, Contract period may be extended by the City of Dover for two (2) additional one (1) year terms if contractor agrees to hold the prices as negotiated. If such an extension occurs, it will be agreed upon by both St. Francis and The City of Dover in written documentation. This is the first one year extension expiring on March 31, 2023. 16. Evaluation of Proposals - Auditor - (Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer) (Staff recommendation: Approval of SB & Company, LLC for the audit services contract not to exceed the fixed price of $51,195, Proposal dated March 22, 2022) 17. Status of Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) and Pension Funds (Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer) (Staff recommendation: Accept the Post Retirement Benefit Liabilities Presentation of July 1, 2021, for Fiscal Year 2022) 18. Proposed Ordinance #2022-03 - Chapter 82 – Planning, Section 82-2 City Planner (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager) (Staff recommendation: Approval of the proposed amendment) 19. Report on Bond Bill Requests (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager) (Committee Action Not Required) 3

Page 4

COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING - April 12, 2022 PAGE 4 20. Report on Segal Study (Sharon Duca, Assistant City Manager) (Staff recommendation: Refer to the City Manager’s Office to complete the pilot test to further assess the Segal Evaluator, Job Description Questionnaires and Job Descriptions) 21. Report on River Walk Progress (Sharon Duca, Assistant City Manager) (Staff recommendation: Authorize the following: 1) that the proposed use of the old Public Works Yard (PWII) off of East Water Street be a potential River Walk Park area; 2) that City funds or other funding sources be used toward the proposed project and 3) that staff work on obtaining funds for the project and work on the project itself) ADJOURNMENT OF THE LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING ADJOURNMENT OF THE COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. PURSUANT TO 29 DEL. C. §10004(e)(2), THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, WHICH ARISE AT THE TIME OF THE MEETING 4

Page 5

Item 2. City of Dover DATA SHEET FOR RECREATION PLAN REVIEW Review of Active Recreation Area Plan and Consideration of Cash-in-Lieu Donation PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING OF April 12, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING of April 18, 2022 Plan Title: McKee Road Apartments Plan Type: Active Recreation Area and Consideration of Cash-in-lieu Donation (Cash-in-lieu of Recreation Area Construction) Associated with Site Development Plan S-21-11 Location: Northeast side of McKee Road at the intersection of McKee Road and Scarborough Road Address: 1385-1389 McKee Road Tax Parcel: ED-05-067.00-02-57.00-000 Owner/Applicant: MCKEE CAP, LLC Site Area: 78.60 acres Zoning: RG-2 (General Residence Zone), C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone), and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) Present Use: Vacant land, wooded areas Proposed Use: Multi-family Community (Apartment Buildings) Dwelling Units: 384 units Recreation Area: Required – 105,600 SF Provided – 87,075 SF (Deficient 18,525 SF) Proposed Cash-in-lieu Donation: $15,561.00 (Appraised Value $0.84/SF x 18,525 SF) P. O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903 5 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

Page 6

Item 2. S-21-11: McKee Road Apartments Active Recreation Area Review and Consideration of Cash-in-Lieu Report to Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee – April 12, 2022 Page 2 of 8 I. PROJECT SUMMARY: The project proposes the construction of sixteen (16) 3-story garden-style apartment buildings each containing twenty-four (24) apartment units. The property at 1385-1389 McKee Road was annexed into the City of Dover in June of 2020. At that time the property was zoned RG-2 (General Residence Zone) with a 5.26-acre portion at the front of the property along McKee Road across from the Emerald Pointe Subdivision zoned C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone). A portion of the property is also subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The current application under review is for the residential portion of the property only. II. ACTIVE RECREATION AREA PLAN SUMMARY: As part of the Plan review process for this project, the applicant prepared a Conceptual Recreation Plan (Revision Received March 29, 2022) which illustrates how the McKee Road Apartments development will provide recreation amenities in accordance with the design specifications described in Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 Section 10: Open space, recreation, and other public facilities. Due to the property size and unit density, this project does not qualify for any of the Active Recreation Area exemptions for small developments under Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 §10.5. The Active Recreation Area is required at a rate of 275 SF per dwelling unit or a half acre (21,780 SF), whichever is greater. With this project of three hundred and eighty-four (384) units, the Active Recreation Area requirement calculates to 105,600 SF which is greater than the half-acre (21,780 SF). The Active Recreation Area proposal for the McKee Road Apartments project is depicted on the Recreation Plans (Revision Received March 29, 2022) and in a Letter of Request. The proposal is to provide a “Club House/Pool” area of 12,000 SF near the entrance to the Community, a concrete Walking Trail throughout the community of 20,275 SF, a Grass Turf Playing Field of 28,000 SF, seven (7) picnic areas totaling 13,300 SF, and a dog park of 13,500 SF. The following table provides information from the submitted Plan for the Active Recreation Area as proposed: Required Provided on Plan Active Recreation 275 S.F. per dwelling unit or ½ • Club House – 6,000 SF Area (Article 5 acre (21,780 SF) whichever is • Pool – 6,000 SF §10.514) greater to be provided on site. • Walking Trail: 6 ft. wide concrete pathway 384 DU = 105,600 SF (2.42 ac) including general Required = 105,600 SF sidewalk areas – 20,275 SF Provided: 87,075 SF (1.99 ac.) • Grass Turf Playing Deficient: 18,525 SF (0.43 ac) Field: maintained grass area measuring 140 ft by 200 ft – 28,000 SF • Dog Park – 13,500 SF • Picnic Areas (7) at 1,900 SF each – 13,300 SF Active Recreation Accessible It is unclear. A floor plan of the Amenities proposed Club House has not 6

Page 7

Item 2. S-21-11: McKee Road Apartments Active Recreation Area Review and Consideration of Cash-in-Lieu Report to Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee – April 12, 2022 Page 3 of 8 (Article 5 §10.15) been submitted; one accessible parking space is provided at Club House. No curb cuts or ramps shown on sidewalks or near street crossings. There is no sidewalk connection to Turf Field. Unsure if any picnic areas will be accessible. Active Recreation Age Oriented to development All amenities seem to be geared Amenities towards older adults. No (Article 5 §10.15) amenities focused on families with small children. Parking Parking is shown near the Club House as a twenty-six (26) space parking lot. No additional parking is located near the Turf Field. Setbacks: 30 feet from There are no specific equipment residential lots and 25 feet from amenities or designated game right-of-way for street court surfaces that must meet this requirement. However the Turf Playing Field does have a corner that goes right to the property line that abuts the railroad tracks which may be of concern. Landscaping Landscaping shows increased tree planting along McKee Road behind the Club House and Pool Area and trees along the walking paths to provide shade. III. CONSIDERATION OF CASH-IN-LIEU The applicant has made a request for consideration of Cash-in-lieu of Recreation Area Construction. Their request seeks to pay cash-in-lieu of construction for the remaining Recreation Area of 18,525 SF (105,600 SF – 87,075 SF). If the Planning Commission determines that the construction of some or all of the required Active Recreation Area is not practical or desirable, then they shall require a full or partial Cash-in-Lieu donation for the portion of the Active Recreation Area determined as not practical or desirable. The applicant would be required to make a cash donation to the City’s Parkland Reserve Fund in lieu of the required recreation area. Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 §10 addresses Open Space, Recreation and Other Public Facilities outlines the calculation of the amount for cash-in-lieu of recreation area construction. 7

Page 8

Item 2. S-21-11: McKee Road Apartments Active Recreation Area Review and Consideration of Cash-in-Lieu Report to Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee – April 12, 2022 Page 4 of 8 For the calculation of the amount of the cash donation, the Zoning Ordinance, Article 5 §10.173 Amount of cash donation specifies that the “cash donation shall be equivalent to the appraised value of land area required…” and that land area value shall be “based on the appraisal prepared for the developer to secure construction financing.” An appraisal performed by CBRE, Inc., dated October 6, 2021, was submitted to the Planning Office on April 1, 2022. This appraisal identifies the value of the gross land areas as $2,850,000. Based on this value the required amount of cash donation would therefore be $15,561. See calculation below: 2021 Appraisal of Land Value: $2,850,000 Land Area = 78.00 AC or 3,397,680 SF $2,850,000 / 3,397,680 SF = $0.84/SF Active Recreation Area Deficit = 18,525 SF x $0.84 Cash-in-Lieu Amount = $15,561 It is noted that this calculation is based on the size of the proposed active recreation area amenities. Should the recreation areas change in size, then the Active Recreation Area Deficit may change requiring recalculation of the Cash-in-Lieu amount. IV. REVIEW PROCESS The Planning Office has prepared this Active Recreation Area Report outlining the Recreation Area proposal and noting the request for Cash-in-lieu donation. The Parks, Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee will need to consider the proposed Active Recreation Area and the proposed Cash-in-lieu of Recreation Area payment request and make a recommendation. The Planning Commission must act to accept the Recreation Area Plan and the Cash-in-lieu donation as part of its review of the Site Development Plan. The Cash-in-lieu amount and the number and types of amenities are subject to change as further details of the plan become finalized. The Parks, Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee will review the Recreation Area Plan and the Consideration for the Cash-in-lieu for McKee Road Apartments at their meeting on April 12, 2022. The Planning Commission Public Hearing and Review of the Site Development Plan S-21-11 and the Recreation Area Plan/Consideration of Cash-in-lieu is scheduled for April 18, 2022. V. CODE CITATIONS: Dover Code of Ordinances, Appendix B – Zoning, Article 5 – Supplementary Regulations, Section 10 – Open Space, Recreation and Other Public Facilities (select excerpts). Article 5 Section 10 Section 10. - Open space, recreation and other public facilities. The City of Dover shall require the reservation of open space, recreation and other public facilities in accordance with the provisions of this section as a condition of approval for all one-family dwelling, two- family dwelling and multiple-family dwelling residential developments requiring conditional use approval, site development plan approval, or land subdivision approval by the City of Dover Planning Commission. 10.1 Recreation areas. 8

Page 9

Item 2. S-21-11: McKee Road Apartments Active Recreation Area Review and Consideration of Cash-in-Lieu Report to Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee – April 12, 2022 Page 5 of 8 10.11 Purpose. The purpose of this section is to ensure that active recreation areas are provided as an integral design element within residential developments and that such facilities are of an adequate scale in relation to the size of the residential development and which provide residents with a variety of active recreational pursuits. 10.12 Dedication required. The commission shall require the dedication or reservation of recreation areas, and the subsequent construction of recreation facilities of a character, extent and location suitable to the needs created by a development for recreation facilities as defined and in accordance with the design guidelines set forth. 10.13 Definition. The following are illustrative of the types of recreation areas and subsequent facilities that shall be deemed to serve active recreational needs and therefore to count toward satisfaction of the recreation area requirements of this section: tennis courts, handball courts, racquetball courts, swimming pools, saunas and exercise rooms, meeting or activity rooms within clubhouses, baseball and soccer fields, basketball courts, volleyball courts, swings, slides and play apparatus, and developed walking, jogging or biking trails. 10.14 Recreation area review…. 10.15 Design guidelines… 10.16 Area required. All residential developments shall provide recreational areas in a size equal to 275 square feet per dwelling unit or one-half acre of land, whichever is greater. In no case shall the commission require that more than ten percent of the gross area of the development be so dedicated or reserved when the gross area is greater than five acres. 10.17 Cash in lieu of recreation area construction. 10.171 Determination of suitability for cash donation. If the commission determines that the construction of recreation is not practical due to close proximity to existing available recreation facilities or infeasible due to natural characteristics of the land or will not benefit the residents of the development, the commission shall require a full or partial cash in lieu of areas of donation to be made by the developer in lieu of a full or partial dedication of land. 10.172 Separate recreation account. The cash donation shall be deposited in a separate account to be used for parks, playgrounds or recreational purposes. 10.173 Amount of cash donation. The cash donation shall be equivalent to the appraised value of land area required in section 10.16. The land area value shall be based on the appraisal prepared for the developer to secure construction financing. This submitted appraisal shall be a copy of the original supplied to the lending institution, with that institution identified, and shall conform in all ways to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal practice and be performed by an appropriately qualified certified appraiser. If an appraisal prepared for construction financing is not available, then the developer shall have an appraisal done in accordance with the procedures set forth in [sub]section 10.174. 10.174 Appeal of appraised value. If the city does not accept the land value established by the appraisal detailed in [sub]section 10.173, the city may, at the developer's expense, require another appraisal be performed. This appraisal will be let on a bid basis between at least three appropriately qualified, certified appraisers selected by the city. The appraiser(s) who prepared the original appraisal in [sub]section 10.173 cannot be a party to this appeal appraisal. 10.175 Payment of cash donation. One hundred percent cash donation provided under this section shall be collected prior to issuing the first building permit for the development. 9

Page 10

Item 2. S-21-11: McKee Road Apartments Active Recreation Area Review and Consideration of Cash-in-Lieu Report to Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee – April 12, 2022 Page 6 of 8 10.7 Council approval. Prior to acceptance by the planning commission, all areas planned for public dedication, or cash donations provided under this section must be submitted to, and approved by the parks, recreation, and community enhancement committee of the City of Dover, and shall be subject to final review and approval by [the] city council. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The following are comments and recommendations from Staff of the Planning Office following review of the Active Recreation Area Plan and Request for Consideration of Cash-in-lieu. 1) Cash-in-Lieu/Area Deficiency: The proposed components throughout the apartment complex as Active Recreation Area – the Club House with Pool, Concrete Walking Trail, Picnic Areas, Dog Park, and Turf Playing Field. With 384 units proposed the total required Active Recreation Area is 105,600 SF and what is proposed is an area of 87,075 SF, a deficit of 18,525 SF (0.43 ac). a. The deficiency of Active Recreation Area must be satisfied. It is the applicant’s intent to pay a Cash-in-Lieu Donation for the remainder of the Active Recreation Area not provided. Other options could be to reduce the unit count or to provide additional amenities throughout the development. 2) Active Recreation Area: As a residential development there is a requirement for Active Recreation area. The project proposes a Club House and Pool Area, Concrete Walking Trails, Picnic Areas, Dog Park, and a Grass Turf Playing Field. The Plan (of March 29, 2022) lacks detail such as a layout for the Club House, or any additional amenities like landscaping, benches, or dog waste stations. While an extensive trail is shown throughout the apartment community, the connectivity to the Club House is very poor only showing sidewalk on the opposite side of the road from the Club House with no crosswalk in the vicinity of the Club House. No bicycle parking is shown on the plans near the Club House or apartment buildings. Staff Recommends the following regarding this Recreation Area: a. Club House / Pool: Further development of the Active Recreation Areas at the Club House and Pool are needed. A floor plan and general use description of the areas within the Club House are needed. The area for the pool and pool deck should be called out on the plans and not just in the data column. Specific amenities in this facility should be identified in order to be evaluated for appropriateness. b. Concrete Walking Trail: There are additional amenities that could be placed along the Trail to extend its use. Dog waste stations, benches and physical fitness stations are all possible additions that would improve the use of the walking trails. Additionally, Staff recommends the developer to reconsider the use of concrete for the walking path in environmentally sensitive areas such as through the patch of woods opposite Buildings 1 and 2. c. Turf Playing Field: The grass turf playing field would benefit from seating, nets, or a shade structure for spectators. d. Bicycle Parking: Bicycle parking should be located inside and around the Apartment 10

Page 11

Item 2. S-21-11: McKee Road Apartments Active Recreation Area Review and Consideration of Cash-in-Lieu Report to Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee – April 12, 2022 Page 7 of 8 Buildings as well as outside of the Club House/Pool area. The presence of the trail on the property would suggest that not only would pedestrians use it, but heavy bicycle use would be common amongst the tenants. Based on the parking on site, the Code requires a minimum of thirty-nine (39) bicycle parking spaces. i. Add exterior (outside) bicycle parking specific to the apartment buildings. ii. Add other bicycle parking locations on site near the Club House and Grass Turf Field. iii. Provide an indoor bike storage area for apartment tenants. e. Pedestrian Connectivity: Staff notes that the sidewalk system could easily be extended in several locations to increase pedestrian connectivity for the overall development. i. Extension of the sidewalk from south of Building 1 along the west side of the entrance drive to the Club House would eliminate the need for pedestrians to cross the entrance drive multiple times. ii. Placement of a crosswalk to the right of Building 10 would complete the loop of the walking trail. A crosswalk at the drive aisle to get to Buildings 3 and 4 would also assist pedestrians in getting to the walking trail portion that runs through the wooded area. f. Accessibility: The details that would show the accessibility of some of the recreation features are not included on this plan. Staff recommends including details showcasing the accessibility in the following areas: i. Show access ramps in the sidewalk/trail networks and in and out of buildings such as the club house and pool area. ii. Show extension of sidewalks to picnic areas. iii. Provide details on handicapped accessible seating options at tables in the picnic areas. g. Age-Based Amenities: It is unclear what the age group is that these apartments will be marketed to. There are no amenities for families with young children. If the apartments were geared towards an older population, one would expect to see benches along the sidewalks for resting. Even if the development was marketed to older people there is a good possibility some of them would have grandchildren and would appreciate a place to take them to play. If this development was geared towards younger people, one would expect to see additional facilities like a fire pit or outdoor seating area where they could gather socially. Opportunities for physical fitness beyond just the walking trail could be offered such as fitness stations, and indoor gym facility, etc. 3) Consideration of Cash-in-lieu of Recreation Area Construction: The Commission should determine how the proposal should best address the requirement for an Active Recreation Area, which must be at least 275 SF per dwelling unit (275 SF x 384 D.U. = 105,600 SF) as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant is seeking to instead pay a Cash-in-lieu for 11

Page 12

Item 2. S-21-11: McKee Road Apartments Active Recreation Area Review and Consideration of Cash-in-Lieu Report to Parks, Recreation & Community Enhancement Committee – April 12, 2022 Page 8 of 8 the 18,525 SF deficit of the required Active Recreation Area. Staff recommends acceptance of the $15,561 Cash-in-Lieu of Recreation Area Construction donation. VII. ADVISORY COMMENTS 1) The Site Development Plan set including any floor plans depicting the Recreational Area in the Club House are to include appropriate improvements, plans, and details of the Recreation Area as approved. 2) When a Cash-in-lieu of Active Recreation Area Construction payment amount is determined and agreed upon, it shall be submitted to the Planning Office prior to the issuance of the Building Permit for the first Apartment Building. The Cash-in-lieu donation will be deposited in the City’s Parkland Reserve Fund account. 3) There shall be provisions which ensure that the community space (all areas under consideration for Active Recreation Areas) shall continue as such and be properly managed and maintained. The developer shall either retain ownership and responsibility for maintenance of the common use areas or provide for and establish one (1) or more organizations for the ownership and maintenance of all common space i.e. a Homeowners Association. The organization shall be responsible for maintenance, insurance and taxes on the community space. 4) In the event, that major changes and revisions to the Plan occur in the finalization of the Plan contact the Planning Office. Examples include reorientation of buildings, relocation of site components, changes in floor area or unit count, or design revisions impacting Active Recreation Areas. These changes may require resubmission for review by the Development Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, or other agencies and commissions making recommendations in regard to the plan. 5) The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee shall submit to the Planning Commission a report detailing the recommendations as to the Recreation Area Plan and Request for Consideration of Cash-in-Lieu. Attachments: • Site Plan S-21-11 McKee Road Apartments Recreation Plan Sheets C-001, C-201, C- 201.1, C-201.2, L-101, L-101.1, and L-101.2 (Revisions Received March 29, 2022) • Building Architecture: Photos of Existing Apartment Projects from Developer • Letter regarding Recreational Areas and Request for Consideration of Cash-in-lieu Donation including Appraisal Information dated 4/1/2022 • Letter addressing Staff Recommendations Dated 4/6/2022 12

Page 13

24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 Item 2. SITE DATA 24x36 24x36 1. OWNER OF RECORD: MEB PROPERTIES LLC N N zC N U cB PO BOX 237 Sa Uz CHESWOLD, DE 19936 Fg C U cA 24x36 (302) 422-3732 Sa p 24x36 cB U SC U RO RO A 2. EQUITABLE OWNER: LC CONSTRUCTION R B BO BO OR H LO G Fgc AR AR U 105 FOULK ROAD O R A SC SC OA cB D WILMINGTON, DE 19810 GH GH Sa bB H 24x36 (302) 429-8700 AD AD 24x36 RO RO FgcA 3. ENGINEER / SURVEYOR: BECKER MORGAN GROUP INC. SacB 309 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVENUE 24x36 DOVER, DE 19904 (302) 734-7950 M CK EE D ARCH I T E C TURE 24x36 ENG I NE E R I NG A RO 4. CITY OF DOVER APP. NO. S-21-11 RO SITE SITE RO SITE H SacB AD AD Fg bB HbB cA 5. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1385 MCKEE ROAD MC MC 24x36 DOVER, DE 19901 KE E KE E Dover, DE 24x36 6. PROPERTY MAP NUMBER: 2-00-06700-01-0100-00001 FgcA M CK EE HbB 309 S. Governors Ave. 7. ZONING CLASSIFICATION: RG-2 GENERAL RESIDENCE, C-2A - LIMITED CENTRAL COMMERCIAL RO AD H Dover, DE 19904 W bB bB (PARCEL CONTAINS COZ OVERLAY ZONE dc A H kB Ph. 302.734.7950 H FgcA 24x36 9. DEED SUMMARY: D.R. 5366/292, D.R. 463/180 cA Wd cA FgcA HbB Fax 302.734.7965 24x36 Fa HbB 10. PLAT REFERENCE: 255-86 11. NUMBER OF LOTS: EXISTING: 1 M C K M C K Salisbury, MD EE EE 24x36 12. SITE AREA: TOTAL PARCEL 78.60 ACRES (3,423,816 SQFT) R O A R O A 312 West Main St. Suite 300 24x36 WOODLAND AREA 42.5 ACRES (3,423,816 SQFT) D D Salisbury, MD 21801 WOODLAND TO REMAIN 38.49 ACRES (3,423,816 SQFT) KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE Ph. 410.546.9100 12. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT: 1 TREE/3000 SQFT OF DEVELOPMENT AREA. Fax 410.546.5824 24x36 AREA OF DEVELOPMENT 1,291,563 SQFT (29.72 ACRES) LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1" = 1200' LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1" = 3000' SOIL SURVEY MAP SCALE: 1" = 1,200' Wilmington, NC 24x36 1 / 3000 SQFT = 431 TREES ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR RIPARIAN BUFFERS (1.63 ACRES OF AREA) SOIL MAP TAKEN FROM "SOIL SURVEY, KENT COUNTY 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 118 TREES (CANOPY AND UNDERSTORY TREES VARYING IN HEIGHT AND SIZE) 24x36 49 SHRUBS (1 GAL POTS OR BARE ROOTS) DELAWARE", MAP NO. 18 & 22 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 24x36 FgcA : FALLSINGTON LOAMS, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES, MID-ATLANTIC Ph. 910.341.7600 12. ACTIVE RECREATION AREA: REQUIREMENT: 275 SQFT/DU 384 * 275 = 105,600 SQFT COSTAL PLAIN Fax 910.341.7506 HbB : HAMBROOK SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES PROVIDED: 77,586 SQFT (28,014 SQFT BALANCE) HkB : HAMBROOK-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 0 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES www.beckermorgan.com 24x36 (+/- 12,000 SQFT CLUBHOUSE/POOL AREA) LO : LONGMARSH AND INDIANTOWN SOILS, FREQUENTLY FLOODED 24x36 (+/- 45,311 SQFT ACTIVE MANICURED TURF FIELDS) SacB : SASSAFRAS SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES, (+/- 20,275 SQFT ACTIVE CONCRETE WALKING TRAILS) MID-ATLANTIC COSTAL PLAIN FEE IN LIEU REQUESTED FOR BALANCE UzC : UDORTHENTS, 0 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES WdcA : WOODSTOWN SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES, FCM 24x36 13. PRESENT USE: VACANT LAND 24x36 14. PROPOSED USE: MULTI-FAMILY COMMUNITY S 34° 52' 34" E 20' B.R.L. MID-ATLANTIC COSTAL PLAIN LA DEL. R.R. REND S N/F AL ESTATE AG 15 PROPOSED BUILDING: BUILDING: 3-STORY, 24 UNITS, +/-10,200 S.F. ED-00-05 ENT 7.00-02-08.00-0 20' B.R.L. 0001 16. BUILDING TYPE: TYPE IIB .8 24x36 13 24x36 548 G FIRC IL DIN 17. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: EXISTING: <1% - 14,560 S.F. (0.33 ACRES) BU 20' B.R.L. ED ITS . ± PROPOSED: 19% - 651,850 S.F. (14.96 ACRES) P OS 24 U0NSQ.F??T.??' 7' P RO 0 0,0 L.: 1 . E F.F MAX IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE - 75% (71,376 SQFT - 1.6385 ACRES) 24x36 18. PARKING CALCULATIONS: APARTMENTS 2 PER DWELLING AND I FOR EVERY 200 SQ.FT. OFFICE SPACE PROPOSED BU 24 UNITS 10,000 SQ.FT. ILDING 6 2723.4 '7 12.73' 24x36 F.F. EL.: ??.? ± AND 0.25 PER DWELLING UNIT FOR VISITOR SPACE. PR ?' FIP ING REQUIRED: 864 PROVIDED: 768 1 . E ILD F.F BU ED ITS . ± 24x36 HANDICAP PARKING SPACES: 32 24x36 14 OS 4 UN Q.FT ?' OP 02,000 LS.: ??.? LOADING BERTHS: N/A REQUIRED / BLD: 2.25 SPACES / UNIT @ 24 UNITS /BLD = 54 SPACES ING S 37 ED IT . ± ILD 5 15 7' PROVIDED: 48 SPACES / BUILDING (REQUESTED WAIVER) BUS OS 4 UN Q.FT ?' DING ° 16' AD 24 30' LANDS N/F 8° 1 10,000UNITS B.R HANDICAP PARKING SPACES: 1 PER BUILDING OP 02,000 LS.: ??.? 1 . E .L. 24x36 24x36 F.F STOLZFUS-MAST PART. BUIL F.F. EL SQ.FT. ± 19. SETBACKS: FRONT YARD: 30' 12 T. M. 2-05-06700-02-1202-00001 N2 RORIES PROPOSED BUILDI 51" W G DEED REF. 6511/192 SIDE YARD: 25' (50' TOTAL BOTH SIDES) OSED .: ??.? IN PR ZONE: M (C.O.D.) ?' REAR YARD: 30' ILD NG 7 S BU 10,0. EL.: PROP 20. BULK REQUIREMENTS: RG-2: GENERAL RESIDENCE (CITY OF DOVER) 10,000 SQ.FT. ± D S .± ' 24x36 24x36 VA SE24 UNSITQ.FT.? F.F 32" H F.F. EL.: ??.??' O ? 24 UNIT OP 21. SIGNAGE FUTURE PERMIT SUBMISSION ?? UG IDTH 00 22. SOURCE OF WATER: CITY OF DOVER E PR RO W. W 24x36 23. SOURCE OF SEWER: CITY OF DOVER SIRC 16 24x36 LANDS N/F 24. SOURCE OF GAS: CHESAPEAKE G COLLEGE PARK MGMT. BO R.O. IN . OS 24 U0 SQ.F??.??' T. M. 2-05-06700-02-1201-00001 ILD 388 25. SOURCE OF ELECTRIC: CITY OF DOVER BU DEED REF. 495/081 0 AR 10,0. EL.: ED NITS T. ± ZONE: M (C.O.D.) 24x36 26. 27. ROAD CLASSIFICATION: STATE STRATEGY LEVEL: MCKEE ROAD, MINOR ARTERIAL (K640) INVESTMENT LEVEL I .18' 11 F.F N 24x36 SC G OP 28. DELDOT TID: PARCELS OUTSIDE OF DELDOT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS IN PR PR OS 24 U0 SQ.F??.??' PROPOSED BUILDING 3 ILD OP BU PROPOSED BUILDING 4 29. DELDOT PROJECT ID No.: ??? 0 G 10,0. EL.: ED NITS T. ± ,0 L IN 24x36 F.F 24 UNITS 10 F. E F. ILD 30. LAND USE JURISDICTION: CITY OF DOVER 24 UNITS BUS . ± 24x36 10,000 SQ.FT. ± 31. PROPERTY LOCATION: LATITUDE N39° 04' 51.39" WRS80 - NAD83 (2011) OP 10,000 SQ.FT. ± EDUNIT .FT .??' F.F. EL.: ??.??' OS 24 00 SQ.: ?? LANDS N/F N2 PR (RD LONGITUDE W75° 30' 15.69" WRS80 - NAD83 (2011) F.F. EL.: ??.??' DARTSWIFT PROPERTY 8 T. M. 2-05-06700-02-1203-00001 24x36 32. SURVEY DATUM: NGS MONUMENTS 9° 0 DEED REF. 237/298 24x36 .N VERTICAL: NAVD 88 - E35 ZONE: M (C.O.D.) 6' 0 LANDS N/F HORIZONTAL: NAD 83 (2011) - CORS 0 MEB PROPERTIES, LLC 719.6 10,0. EL.: F.F PR T. M. PARCEL 2-00-06700-01-0100-00001 OP O. 3" E ING 33. SURVEY UNIT: LINEAR: US SURVEY FOOT RADIUS: 1849.86' BU ILD DEED REF. 5366/292 ED ITS . ± ZONING: RS1 (K.C.) 24x36 ANGULAR: DEGREES MINUTES SECONDS (DMS) ARC LENGTH: 1709.26' OS 24 U0NSQ.F??T.??' PERMANENT STORMWATER EASEMENT 78.60 ACRES± 7' 24x36 29 10 TO BENEFIT THE STATE OF DELAWARE COORDINATE TYPE: GROUND SEE DEED REF: 463-180 PROJECT TITLE CHD. BRG: N 12° 09' 31" W FCM FCM 34. MONUMENTATION: 4 FOUND / 3 SET CHD. LENGTH: 1649.10' 4) PROPOSED BUILDING 9 35. SURVEY CLASSIFICATION: SUBURBAN SURVEY 24x36 36. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA: 0.27 ACRES 24 UNITS S 36 MCKEE ROAD 24x36 10,000 SQ.FT. ± 13" W 37. TOTAL WOODLAND PRES. AREA 38.50 ACRES 38. 39. PERCENT SLOPE DUMPSTER REQUIREMENTS : SLOPES VARY BETWEEN 1-5% ACROSS THE SITE. 2 DUMPSTERS FOR FIRST 48 UNITES THEN 1 PER 24. F.F. EL.: ??.??' ° 06' LANDS N/F CAPITAL SCHOOL DISTRICT T. M. 2-05-06700-02-4800-00001 APPARTMENTS 33' 24x36 24x36 DEED REF. 107/313 192. 1 24 B F.F ,000 NITS UIL ZONE: IO (C.O.D.) 2 0 U REQUIRED :2 FOR FIRST 48 UNITS. 384 - 48 = 336 UNITS / 24 = 14 DUMPSTERS . E SQ DIN PROVIDED : 16 DUMPSTERS FCM L.: .FT ?? . ± .?? ' G ED N 40° 42' 45" W MCKEE ROAD OS OP PR 30' B.R.L. 293.51' CITY OF DOVER S 48° 16' 18" W 24x36 24x36 30 'B .R .L 10 24 U B LANDS N/F KENT COUNTY, DE MARTHA E. . 1 F.F ,000 NITS UIL . E SQ L.: .FT ?? . ± DIN G T. M. 2-00-06700BAYNARD -01-02 DEED REF. X20/0 00-00001 .?? ' ED ZONE: RS1 (K.C.)78 24x36 OS 24x36 OP PR ) 24x36 56 24x36 .1 30' B.R.L. .W RO 0 25 50 100 S 38° 37' 45" E 825.31' X SCALE : 1" = 50' FIP .W A N 51° 22' 15" E 24x36 30 24x36 'B .R.L . 80' ID D CO X Z-1 RE TH ( 60' STR R CO ICT SHEET TITLE A D. V 30' Z-1 ION RE B.R 24x36 275.00' .L. 24x36 STR R IE N ICT S O ION COVER SHEET 527.51' EE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENTS 24x36 C K R .O 100' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK . 24x36 50' COZ-1 RESTRICTION . 80' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK M 30' B.R.L. 50' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK 40' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK 30' B.R.L. 50' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK 40' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK 30' B.R.L. 30' B.R.L. 40' COZ-1 RESTRICTION 840.20' N 38° 37' 45" W 24x36 FCM MCKEE ROAD (RD. NO. 156) FCM FCM FCM . 24x36 R.O.W. WIDTH VARIES FCM 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 0 50 100 200 24x36 24x36 SCALE : 1" = 100' 24x36 24x36 ISSUE BLOCK LEGEND ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED 24x36 24x36 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SANITARY GRAVITY SEWER LINE, EX. 10"S 10" S SIZE & FLOW DIRECTION CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SLAB / PAVING SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN, SIZE EX. 10" F.M. 12" F.M. IMPERVIOUS SURFACED ROAD, DRIVE & FLOW DIRECTION 24x36 24x36 OR PARKING LOT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (S.M.H.) INDIVIDUAL TREE OR BUSH N/A EVERGREEN DECIDUOUS SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT WIRE FENCE X X X X X X 24x36 CHAINLINK FENCE WATER MAIN & SIZE EX. 10" W 12" W 24x36 STOCKADE FENCE FIRE HYDRANT F.H. F.H. . STRUCTURE (CONCRETE, WOOD, WATER VALVE (W.V.) OR METER (W.M.) . . . 24x36 METAL, ETC.) W.M. W.V. W.M. W.V. 24x36 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (S.D.M.H.) LAYER STATE: C-001 DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE EMBANKMENT SIDESLOPES (DOWN) STORM DRAIN LINE (CMP OR RCP) PROJECT NO.: 2018217.00 24x36 24x36 CONTOUR 49 55 CATCH BASIN DATE: 10/01/2021 43.55 ELEVATION SPOT SHOT 25.15 25.50 T.C. UTILITY POLE W/ OVERHEAD SERVICE (TELEPHONE OR ELECTRIC OR BOTH) SCALE: 1" = 100' 25.00 B.C. BENCH MARK DRAWN BY: A.C.F. PROJ. MGR.: J.N.S. 24x36 24x36 N/A UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC U.E. U.E. PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE U.T. U.T. SHEET CENTERLINE UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN EX. 2" G 2" G 24x36 LIGHT POLE PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED N/A C-001 COPYRIGHT 2019 24x36 13 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2018\2018217\DWG\2018217-SITE-C3D18.dwg, Mar 25, 2022 - 10:26am .PDF 24x36 24x36 2022-03-25 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36

Page 14

24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 Item 2. KEY MAP - MCKEE ROAD APPARTMENTS FCM 24x36 24x36 . N SC AR H 24x36 24x36 C-206 C-204 UG RO BO A RO 24x36 24x36 D C-203 FCM 30 24x36 C-205 33 ARCH I T E C TURE 24x36 S 34° 52' 34" E C-201 30 ENG I NE E R I NG 33 20' B.R.L. 24x36 C-202 30 Dover, DE 24x36 36.6' MCKEE ROAD 34 35 31 29 309 S. Governors Ave. EX. 35 32 WETLANDS 27 2298 Dover, DE 19904 33 33 Ph. 302.734.7950 SCALE: 1" = 750' 24x36 34 20' B.R.L. Fax 302.734.7965 24x36 33 33 35 34 50' Salisbury, MD 35 29 36 EX. 24x36 ACTIVE 37 36 8"W WETLANDS 312 West Main St. Suite 300 24x36 OPEN SPACE 30 Salisbury, MD 21801 .87' 28000 SQFT 13 6' 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) Ph. 410.546.9100 ING 36 30 548 33 100' ILD 50' WETLANDS U G 34 BUFFER Fax 410.546.5824 ± D BS 37 30 SE UNIT FT. 30 24x36 24x36 PO 24 0 SQ. 37.5' 36 Wilmington, NC O 00 35 TURF 34 PLAYING FIELDS PR 10, F. EL .: 37 F. F.H. PICNIC AREA 36 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 1,900 S.F. ± 37 10' 38 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 24x36 36 37 Ph. 910.341.7600 24x36 6' SEWE R C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 31 36 31 Fax 910.341.7506 36 37 G 100' WETLANDS PROPOSED B 35 10' BUFFER UILDING 6 www.beckermorgan.com 18' S GE 24 UNITS RA 24x36 24x36 32 8" 32 10,000 SQ.FT. GA CES W.V. 36 F.F. EL.: 38.5'± 4' ED SPA 18' OS 34 15' 37 OP ING G 33 9X18' PARKING SPACE 18' PR PARK E 12' AG 33 38 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 36 AR ES 24x36 12' 24x36 R SEWE 4' D G PAC F.H. OS E S 5 4' 38 ING 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 12' OP ING 12' 34 37 6' PR PARK 36 6' ILD G 5 18' 18' S 37 G 8" 34 FCM 6' BU 18' 24x36 35 35 G W.V. 37 24x36 37 35 SWM AREA 36 G ED ITS . ± 15' F 12' 8"W 36 12' 15' OS 4 UN Q.FT .5' G G 8" S PICNIC AREA W.V. 12 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEWER 12' OP 02,000ESL.: 37 36 G 8" S ' 1,900 S.F. ± 36 35 4' 8"W PR 24x36 12' 6' 4' 24x36 37 12' C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 36 15' 35 SEW 1 F. 37 18' ER 35 8"W . 36 PICNIC AREA 38 PROPOSED GA 1,900 S.F. ± 36 5 PARKING SP RAGE W.V. ACES 9X18' PARKING SPACE 8 "S 336 37 15 50' EX. WETLANDS 6 24x36 F.H. PICNIC AREA 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 24x36 G SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 38 1,900 S.F. ± 36 36 ED ITS . ± 8"W 37 37 OS 4 UN Q.FT .5' 36 G G OP 02,000ESL.: 37 LANDS N/F 24x36 G 36 37 MEB PROPERTIES, LLC 8"W 24x36 30' 6' 37 37 8"W 18' T. M. PARCEL 2-00-06700-01-0100-00001 PR B.R DEED REF. 5366/292 .L. 12' 38 ZONING: RS1 (K.C.) 1 F. 5 78.60 ACRES± BU 317 37 F. 18' 12' 18' DING ILD 24 2' 18' 37 24x36 24x36 10,000UNITS 12' C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID R SEWE 12' 10' C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER 15' 38 ING 18' BUIL 4' 4' GE GE 8"W F.F. E SQ.FT. ± 18' 4' 36 RA 14 RA GA CES GA CES PROP G L.: 38 24x36 24x36 ED SPA ED SPA OSED G 50' WETLANDS 5 PAROSED GAR G G OS 35 OS 6' .5' BUFFER N2 OP ING OP ING . ED ITS . ± SWM AREA PR PARK PR PARK KING A SPAC GE 6' OS 4 UN Q.FT ??' 8° 1 6' PROP 8"W N PROPOSED BUIL 12' 12' 5 39 5 50' 36 34 24x36 24x36 12' OP 02,000 LS.: ??. 18' 37 7' 3 4' 10' 8" S ES PR 18' 38 8"W SEWE R 2" C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 24 UNITS 100' 4' 1 . E BU DING 7 E 15' 37 10,000 SQ.FT. ± 8" F.F 24x36 G 33 24x36 ACTIVE ACTIVE ILD 37 18' WIDE SUBSURFACE G 36 SC 35 S FIRE ACCESS (TYP.) ACTIVE F.F. EL.: 37.5' G WALKING TRAIL 8"W DOG PARK WALKING TRAIL 35 ING 35 39 13.500 S.F. ± 18' G 10' G WALKING TRAIL 34 4,776 S.F. ± AR 36 5,800 S.F. ± 18' 10' 6,825 S.F. ± 33 24x36 12 8"W 24x36 AD 38 9X18' PARKING SPACE 36 37 39 38 SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 37 ROARIES 39 100' WETLANDS 38 PICNIC AREA 9X18' PARKING SPACE BUFFER 36 EX. WETLANDS 37 1,900 S.F. ± 24x36 37 LINE 24x36 EX. WETLANDS 37 LINE PROJECT TITLE H HV G UGWIDT SIRC 49' G DOUBLE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE (TYP.) 10' 36 15' C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID R 8" WATER LINE SEWE 24x36 RO .W. 18' 15. 38 10' 4' RA GE 36 G 8" SEWER LINE MCKEE ROAD 24x36 GA CES 9X18' PARKING SPACE W.V. PROPOSED 5 SPACE 6' BO R.O 39 50' ' 6' SWM AREA 39 18' GARAGE ED SPA APPARTMENTS 8" WATER LINE G 8"W 38 18 F.H. OS 36 OP ING PICNIC AREA 106' ED ITS . ± 37 36 PR PARK 1,900 S.F. ± 35 36 3332 24x36 34 6' 24x36 35 OS 4 UN Q.FT .5' 37 15. 6' 8" 5 31 (R 3231 MCKEE ROAD 4' 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) OP 02,000ESL.: 37 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 37 G S DOUBLE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE (TYP.) D. 388 G 4' 3334 G 18' WIDE SUBSURFACE CITY OF DOVER PR FIRE ACCESS (TYP.) 24x36 37 12' 18' 9X18' PARKING SPACE 24x36 NO .18' 12' 1 F. BU 39 18' KENT COUNTY, DE PROPOSED GARAGE G F. 8" S 8"W 18' .2 15' 37 ILD 12' G 37 ING 9X18' PARKING SPACE 4' 36 94 GE 12' 36 24x36 24x36 5 PARKING SPACES 38 RA .4' 50 10' 18' 38 38 GA CES ) 18' 16 ED SPA 36 50' OS W.V. 37 OP ING G ED ITS . ± PR PARK 24x36 G 4' 10' 24x36 35 18' OS 4 UN Q.FT ??' 6' 5 OP 02,000 LS.: ??. 8" 38 S 4' 34 8"W PR 35 18' 12' 12' 18' 18' 12' 12' 18' 35 37 24x36 24x36 1 . E 12' ING PROPOSED BUILDING 3 37 12' F.F PROPOSED BUILDING 4 ILD 39 6' 36 SHEET TITLE 24x36 BU G 24 UNITS 24x36 35 24 UNITS G 9X18' PARKING SPACE SEWE R W.V. 37 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 6' 36 11 AG E 18' W.V. W.V. 10,000 SQ.FT. ± 38 SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 8" S SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 6' 38 10,000 SQ.FT. ± SITE PLAN AR ES F.F. EL.: 38.5' 24x36 39 6' 18' OS E OP ING PR PARK D GSPAC 4' G 36 12' S 18' 37 10' F.F. EL.: 38.5' PR. TREE LINE . 24x36 8" 35 36 37 40 18' 12' 12' 18' 5 12' 36 15' W.V. 37 F.H. 37 . 24x36 12' 12' F.H . 12' G 4' 8 "S 18' 6' G 12' 12' 8"W . 24x36 N2 G 32 40 36 33 34 35 12' 18' 32 9° 0 12' 8"W 33 18' 12' 38 34 36 15' 24x36 24x36 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 35 8" 6' 0 . C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW W.V ER 18' 36 4' 6' S 6' 36 36 3" E 6' PROPOSED GARAGE 41 G 12' 18' 39 10 36 18' 12' 24x36 G 24x36 IL DIN 3638 8" S PR. TREE LINE BU 5 PARKING SPACES G 0 25 50 100 ED NITS T. ± 40 P OS 24 U0 SQ.F37.5' 8"W 38 38 24x36 P RO 00 10, F. EL .: 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 24x36 F. 6' 8" SEWER LINE 41 37 RADIUS: 1849.86' 42 10' 37 SCALE : 1" = 50' 8" WATER LINE 24x36 ARC LENGTH: 1709.26' 8"W 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 37 24x36 38 SEWER 18' C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID CHD. BRG: N 12° 09' 31" W 6' ISSUE BLOCK CHD. LENGTH: 1649.10' 37 39 12' 37 8" S FCM G 37 G 38 6' 40 12' C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID R SEWE 24x36 G 38 24x36 42 50' WETLANDS 37 BUFFER 6' EX. W.V. 8" PR. TREE LINE WETLANDS 8"W W.V. S F.H. W.V. 43 37 12' 12' 39 41 6' W.V. SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 24x36 100' WETLANDS 38 G 39 24x36 38 BUFFER 39 8" SEWER LINE 44 39 8" WATER LINE 40 40 39 SC 10 0' 41 50 42 AR 24x36 24x36 ' EX. WETLANDS PR. TREE LINE 18' 40 EX. WETLANDS G 40 PR. TREE LINE 39 PR ADES LINE 41 5 P OPO AR SED 8"W 12' . KIN G 8" . . ROARI 4' G S ARA S 6' . 24x36 PA GE 24x36 SWM AREA 12' CE S 17 41 12' MARK DATE DESCRIPTION V 37 9X18' PARKING SPACE 8"W 9' G LAYER STATE: C-201 41 41 39 38 H H 42 4 1 40 18' 40 12' G IDT PROJECT NO.: 2018217.00 36 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 4' 24x36 U .W 36 4 39 DATE: 10-01-2021 24x36 RO.O.W 37 41 0 42 G 38 41 BO R 39 6' 41 SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SCALE: 1" = 50' 24x36 37 38 0 36 40 42 42 41 41 DRAWN BY: A.C.F. PROJ. MGR.: J.N.S. 24x36 39 4142 41 4 24 PR G (R OP OS 41 SHEET D. D 10 24 U B E 24x36 N O 24 F.F ,000 NITS UIL . E SQ L.: .FT. 43. ± DIN G 2 8"W G G 18' C-201 24x36 .2 FCM 30' COPYRIGHT 2019 14 94 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2018\2018217\DWG\2018217-SITE-C3D18.dwg, Mar 29, 2022 - 10:34am .PDF 24x36 24x36 ) 2022-03-29 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36

Page 15

24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 30 Item 2. 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) KEY MAP - MCKEE ROAD APPARTMENTS 33 50' WETLANDS 6' 100' 30 20' B.R.L. 24x36 G 34 BUFFER 24x36 37 30 34 31 36 . 30 35N SC AR F.H. PICNIC AREA 36 24x36 H C-206 C-204 1,900 S.F. ± 37 10' 24x36 38 UG 37 RO 36 31 BO 30 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID R SEWE 31 36 24x36 RO A G 100' WETLANDS PROPOSED B BUFFER UILDING 6 24x36 S D GE 24 UNITS RA 32 29 8" 32 10,000 SQ.FT GA CES W.V. C-203 36 .± F.F. EL.: 38.5' 18' WIDE SUBSURFACE FIRE ACCESS (TYP.) 4' ED SPA 32 C-205 OS 37 ARCH I T E C TURE OP ING 24x36 33 24x36 18' 18' PR PARK E E AG AR ES D GSPAC 5 4' 12' C-201 33 38 F.H. 38 8"W 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 29 30 3 321 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ENG I NE E R I NG OS ING OP ING 12' 34 37 6' PR PARK 6' 36 Dover, DE ILD 5 18' 24x36 8" C-202 18' EX. 24x36 37 G 3029 34 WETLANDS BU S MCKEE ROAD 35 G W.V. 37 309 S. Governors Ave. 37 32 31 35 SWM AREA 36 G 6' ED ITS . ± 36 15' F 12' 12' 8"W 15' G Dover, DE 19904 OS 4 UN Q.FT .5' G G 8" S Ph. 302.734.7950 SCALE: 1" = 750' SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 12 12' OP 02,000ESL.: 37 24x36 8" S Fax 302.734.7965 ' 24x36 36 35 4' PR C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 6' 4' ' G SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 36 36 12 15' 1 F. Salisbury, MD SEW 37 ER 18' 8"W PROPOSED GA 12 ' ACTIVE 36 . 38 5 PARKING SP RAGE S ACES WALKING TRAIL 34 312 West Main St. Suite 300 24x36 8" 15 EX. 3366 24x36 37 50' WETLANDS PICNIC AREA 2,874 S.F. ± 32 Salisbury, MD 21801 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 38 1,900 S.F. ± Ph. 410.546.9100 ING 37 36 Fax 410.546.5824 37 ILD 36 24x36 G 24x36 G Wilmington, NC BU LANDS N/F 36 37 37 6' MEB PROPERTIES, LLC 8"W 1 3 32 3 8"W T. M. PARCEL 2-00-06700-01-0100-00001 ED ITS . ± F 18' DEED REF. 5366/292 G 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 G OS 4 UN Q.FT .5' 12' 38 ZONING: RS1 (K.C.) 5 78.60 ACRES± 0 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 37 OP 02,000ESL.: 37 24x36 24x36 18' 31 7 12' Ph. 910.341.7600 24 DING 2' 18' PR 37 10,000UNITS 12' 10' 30 Fax 910.341.7506 1 F. C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER 38 . 18' BUIL 4' W.V. GE 8"W www.beckermorgan.com F.F. E SQ.FT. ± 18' 4' 36 RA 24x36 24x36 14 31 GA CES PROP G ED SPA L.: 38 OSED 50' WETLANDS 5 PAROSED GAR G G OS 6' 35 .5' BUFFER OP ING 12' 18' SWM AREA 18' PR PARK 12' KING A SPAC GE G 50' 8"W 24x36 24x36 PROP 6' PROPOSED BUIL 12' 39 5 50' 12' 36 37 34 32 ES 4' 34 10' 8" S 36 18' 38 SEWE R C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 24 UNITS PROPOSED GARA 100' 4' 24x36 24x36 DING 7 15' 37 10,000 SQ.FT. ± 8" S 5 PARKING SPAC GE G 33 6' ACTIVE G ACTIVE 18' WIDE SUBSURFACE 36 37 8"W 100' 32 FIRE ACCESS (TYP.) ACTIVE F.F. EL.: 37.5' WALKING TRAIL 8"W DOG PARK WALKING TRAIL 35 39 13.500 S.F. ± 18' G 10' G WALKING TRAIL 34 5,800 S.F. ± 4,776 S.F. ± 18' ES 24x36 10' 24x36 8"W 6,825 S.F. ± 33 9X18' PARKING SPACE G 36 32 38 SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 15' 4' 32100' WETLANDS 37 100' WETLANDS BUFFER EX. WETLANDS 24x36 9X18' PARKING SPACE BUFFER 38 PICNIC AREA LINE 36 EX. WETLANDS 37 1,900 S.F. ± 24x36 37 LINE 34 EX. WETLANDS 37 LINE G PR. TREE LINE DOUBLE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE (TYP.) 24x36 36 15' 8" WATER LINE 24x36 38 4' GE G RA 36 10' 8" SEWER LINE GA CES 9X18' PARKING SPACE W.V. PROPOSED 5 SPACE 6' SWM AREA 39 18' GARAGE ED SPA 8" WATER LINE 8"W F.H. G OS 36 F.H. OP ING 106' 24x36 24x36 PICNIC AREA W.V. ED ITS . ± 36 33 PR PARK 1,900 S.F. ± 35 3332 34 6' 35 OS 4 UN Q.FT 5' 6' 8" 5 31 3231 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 33 33 OP 02,000ESL.: 37. 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 37 G S 6' 35 32 32 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) G 18' WIDE SUBSURFACE DOUBLE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE (TYP.) 4' 3334 24x36 24x36 G PR FIRE ACCESS (TYP.) 18' 35 35 12' 9X18' PARKING SPACE 8" WATER LINE 1 F. 33 12' 39 BU . PROPOSED GARAGE G 8" SEWER LINE F. 8" S 8"W 18' 24x36 15' 37 ILD 12' G 37 N 24x36 ING 9X18' PARKING SPACE F.H. 4' 36 G GE 12' W.V. C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 36 R SEWE 5 PARKING SPACES 38 RA 18' 38 38 GA CES 16 ED SPA 36 50' OS W.V. 24x36 37 34 24x36 OP ING G PR. TREE LINE PR PARK G 4' 8"W 10' 35 18' 5 8" 24x36 S 4' 34 PR 36 24x36 8"W 35 18' 12' 12' 18' 18' 12' 12' 18' 35 35 G OP 37 33 33 35 12' BS .± PROPOSED BUILDING 3 37 12' EDUNIT .FT .xx' PROPOSED BUILDING 4 39 6' 18 ' 35 24x36 36 36 12 ' 12 ' OS 24 00 SQ.: xx PROJECT TITLE 24x36 24 UNITS G ,0 L UI EX. 10 F. E ' 18 24 UNITS WETLANDS G 9X18' PARKING SPACE 35 LD SEWE R W.V. 37 6' F. C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 6' 36 4' 10,000 SQ.FT. ± 18' 38 SEWER 8" S 6' 34 34 IN 10,000 SQ.FT. ± C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID MCKEE ROAD C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER GE W.V. W.V. 38 G 36 F.F. EL.: 38.5' RA 24x36 24x36 GA A C E S GE 36 PR. TREE LINE 8 F.F. EL.: 38.5' D E SP 12' 37 PR. TREE LINE 36 8" G OS RA ES 18' 10' OP ING S GA AC 35 APPARTMENTS 6' 18' PR PARK 4' G S 8" 35 36 35 PR. TREE LINE ED SP 5 12' 12' OS ING W.V. 12' 18' 15' 37 37 OP K 24x36 18' F.H. 24x36 36 4' S 6' PR PAR 4' 36 12' 12' 12' F.H . 12' G 8" 18' G 12' 8"W 5 15 ' MCKEE ROAD G 32 36 33 36 24x36 12' 8"W 34 35 32 18' 12' 12' 18' 37 CITY OF DOVER 24x36 33 34 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID W.V . 15' 8" 36 35 PICNIC AREA G W KENT COUNTY, DE 18' 36 4' 37 10 8" 6' S 6' 1,900 S.F. ± 37 ' 36 36 6' 38 PROPOSED GARAGE 24x36 G 12' 18' ' 24x36 10 36 18' 12' 37 18 37 ING 8" S 38 ILD 3638 PR. TREE LINE 39 BU 39 65' 5 PARKING SPACES G 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) SEDUNITS.FT. ±' O 4 Q .5 8"W 38 OP 02,000ESL.: 37 38 24x36 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 24x36 100' PR SEWER 1 F. 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 38 MAINTENANCE . G F 40 BUILDING 6' 8" SEWER LINE 37 9X18' PARKING SPACE 24x36 10' 37 37 24x36 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 8" WATER LINE 39 8"W 37 38 SEWER 18' C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 6' 37 39 12' 37 8" S 37 SHEET TITLE G 37 50' EX. 24x36 G 38 6' WETLANDS 24x36 40 12' 40 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID R SEWE G 38 37 40 SITE PLAN 50' WETLANDS 42 BUFFER 6' EX. W.V. 8" PR. TREE LINE WETLANDS 8"W W.V. S G W.V. 24x36 100' WETLANDS 37 38 41 6' 12' G 12' F.H. W.V. SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 39 41 38 50' WETLANDS BUFFER . 24x36 39 41 . BUFFER 38 39 39 39 40 8" SEWER LINE 39 8" WATER LINE 40 40 39 42 PR. TREE LINE . PROPOSED BUILDING 9 15' 24x36 24x36 R 0' 41 50 4' 10 CA 42 ' EX. 40 WETLANDS PR. TREE LINE 18' PROPOSED GARAGE EX. WETLANDS G 8"W 8" S PR. TREE LINE 39 PR 40 BO 24 UNITS LINE 41 12' 5 P OPO AR SED 8"W 24x36 KIN G 8" 24x36 RO G S ARA 10,000 SQ.FT. ± 4' S 6' G PA GE 5 PARKING SPACES SWM AREA 12' CE 17 41 37 S 12' 6' U 41 F.F. EL.: 40.00' 37 9X18' PARKING SPACE 8"W 9' G G 41 41 39 38 H 42 4 1 40 36 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 18' 40 12' 10' 18' 24x36 4' 38 24x36 36 4' 4 39 40 39 37 0 25 50 100 RO 41 0 42 G 38 41 18' 12' 12' 18' 39 24x36 AD 39 6' 41 SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 24x36 37 38 0 36 40 42 42 41 41 39 4142 41 4 24 PR G G 40 40 SCALE : 1" = 50' (R OP OS 41 9X18' PARKING SPACE 24x36 D. E 10 24 U B D 8"W 24x36 F.F ,000 NITS UILD 24 N . E SQ. ING 18' 41 ISSUE BLOCK O L.: FT 43. . ± 2 8"W G G PR .2 24 30' 12' 5 P OPO AR SED 8" 24x36 ) 41 41 4' KIN G G S ARA S 24x36 94 PA GE 1 FI 8' W 41 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 41 SEW ER 12' CE 8"W 42 40 41 42 22. 60' G S RE I D AC E 9' 24 39 1 41 8" W CE SUB 18' SS SU G 8" 10' EX. 38 41 18' 4' 24x36 WETLANDS 100' (T RF 24x36 39 19. YP A 24 40 18' 4' .) CE 42 S 15' G 6' W.V. W.V. SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 24x36 24 30 40 8" 41 24x36 'B .R W.V. S SEWER .L C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID . 42 41 38 18 FIR' WID 41 PR G 40 EA ES OP . CC UBS ES OS . . S ( URFA E 6' . 24x36 TY P.) CE D G 10 24 U BU 24x36 F.H. F.F,000 SNITS ILD 40 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 10' . E Q. L.: FT. ING 40 40 LAYER STATE: C-201 G 42. ± 1 18' 5' 41 PROJECT NO.: 2018217.00 24x36 6' WIDE P.C.C. SIDEWALK (TYP.) 24x36 W.V. 41 42 DATE: 10-01-2021 42 41 41 42 50' 41 ' SCALE: 1" = 50' 41 12 10 0' ' FO 12 DRAWN BY: A.C.F. PROJ. MGR.: J.N.S. 24x36 24x36 G 42 42 SHEET PR. TREE LINE PR. TREE LINE 42 EX. WETLANDS FO C-201.1 24x36 8" W 24x36 COPYRIGHT 2019 15 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2018\2018217\DWG\2018217-SITE-C3D18.dwg, Mar 29, 2022 - 10:35am .PDF 24x36 24x36 2022-03-29 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36 24x36

Page 16

Page 17

24x36 24x36 Item 2. OE KEY MAP - MCKEE 3 ROAD APPARTMENTS EX. OE 1 WETLANDS OE 24x36 G 3 24x36 DIN 3 OE PS UIL . . TO OE N OE D BS 20' B.R.L. H UG C-PR-L-TREE-PS G OE C-PR-L-TREE-PS ± 3 E IT L-106 . ' RO OS 24 UNSQ.FT 24x36 24x36 L-104 .?? BO TO C-PR-L-TREE-PS OP 000 : ? ? SC AR PR 10, . EL. F.H. 5 24x36 F.F AD PA 24x36 RO SEWE C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID R 2 L-103 PROPOSED B L-105 G AS 24 UNITS UILDING 6 ARCH I T E C TURE 24x36 2 24x36 10,000 SQ.FT. L-101 0.52 ACRES F.F. EL.: ??.? ± AS ENG I NE E R I NG ING 5 RIPARIAN BUFFER PLANTING AREA ?' G Dover, DE GS L-102 ILD 24x36 24x36 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID R SEWE F.H. MCKEE ROAD 5 3 309 S. Governors Ave. BU C-PR-L -TREE -CV PA PP Dover, DE 19904 G EX. Ph. 302.734.7950 SCALE: 1" = 750' G WETLANDS 24x36 F. G Fax 302.734.7965 ED ITS . ± 24x36 2 SWM AREA G 2 -CV -TREE C-PR-L CR G OS 4 UN Q.FT ??' G G AS Salisbury, MD SEWER 5 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID C-PR-L-TREE-PS OP 02,000 LS.: ??. -CV 312 West Main St. Suite 300 -TREE C-PR-L 24x36 2 0.85 ACRES AS C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 3 24x36 5 SEWER RIPARIAN BUFFER G C-PR-L -TREE -CV CA Salisbury, MD 21801 14 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW C-PR-L-TREE-PS ER PR PP PLANTING AREA PS Ph. 410.546.9100 1 . E C-PR-L-TREE-PS Fax 410.546.5824 ING EX. F 24x36 WETLANDS 24x36 3 SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 4 Wilmington, NC 5 E UNIT .FT. ±?' -CV -TREE C-PR-L D CR GS PP 5 2 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 2 UIL 15 S ? G C-PR-L-TREE-AR Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LT 2 000 : ? 24x36 G CA 24x36 PROP Ph. 910.341.7600 B -CV -TREE C-PR-L CR 10, . EL. O 24 SQ .? 1 G Fax 910.341.7506 D S C-PR-L -TREE -CV G CR 5 F.F www.beckermorgan.com OSED 24x36 PA 24x36 10,00 S 2 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER 5 C-PR-L-TREE-AR F.F. E0 SQ.FT. ± CA -CV ING 7 -TREE C-PR-L 3 C-PR-L-TREE-PS TO 24 UN BUILDIN OP C-PR-L-TREE-PS 24x36 G PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS 2 24x36 L.: ?? G G G PR 3 C-PR-L-TREE-AR CA .??' SWM AREA PROPOSED BUIL GS C-PR-L-TREE-AR G G 24x36 1 24x36 24 UNITS 3 5 IT -CV -TREE C-PR-L LT CR PS R SEWE C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 3 10,000 SQ.FT. ± C-PR-L -TREE -CV GS C-PR-L-TREE-PS D 24x36 24x36 G 2 G 5 4 1 F.F. EL.: ??.??' 3 C-PR-L-TREE-PS G C-PR-L-TREE-AR GS 2 CA G C-PR-L-TREE-AR PP C-PR-L-TREE-PS LT CR C-PR-L -TREE -CV 3 G 24x36 C-PR-L -TREE -CV CR TO C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L -TREE -CV 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-PS G 2 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID -CV -TREE SEW C-PR-L ER C-PR-L-TREE-AR 1 CA 1 24x36 AS PA 24x36 2 1 3 G 3 C-PR-L-TREE-AR CA C-PR-L -TREE -CV C-PR-L -TREE -CV CR G CR TO 16 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID R SEWE 24x36 2 C-PR-L -TREE -CV G 24x36 CR 3 C-PR-L-TREE-AR 3 ING SWM AREA PY C-PR-L-TREE-PS G F.H. PS G F.H. C-PR-L-TREE-PS 3 C-PR-L -TREE -CV D NBITS T. ± C-PR-L-TREE-PS 24x36 3 GS D 24x36 2 24 0 SQ ??.? UIL 3 -CV -TREE AS C-PR-L CA 2 3 TO CA 3 . 00 G 2 : E 10, . EL. G TO G PS N -CV -TREE C-PR-L CR S U .F ?' 24x36 1 24x36 PA . F C-PR-L-TREE-PS G C-PR-L-TREE-PS F -TREE -CV 2 4 G GS C-PR-L C-PR-L-TREE-PS 24x36 11 CR C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID G F.H. 24x36 PO R SEWE 5 3 ING TO 2 AS O 2 1 PR CA PR -CV G C-PR-L -TREE CR PROPOSED BUILDING 3 S 24 U SQ.F .??' CA -CV -TREE C-PR-L 24x36 24x36 ILD G BUS ?? S .± EDUNIT .FT .??' PROPOSED BUILDING 4 D 000 : C-PR-L-TREE-AR E NIT T. ± OS 24 0 SQ: ?? 10, . EL. 24x36 24x36 C-PR-L -TREE -CV C-PR-L-TREE-QPH G C-PR-L-TREE-AR PROJECT TITLE 24 UNITS 3 F.F OP 0,00. EL. 6 CR 1 24 UNITS MCKEE ROAD GB CA BU C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR 24x36 24x36 G 10,000 SQ.FT. ± EX. O 1 WETLANDS -CV C-PR-L-TREE-AR -TREE C-PR-L OP G 7 SEWE R 1 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID F.F LT 10,000 SQ.FT. ± ILD APPARTMENTS SEWER CR C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER C-PR-L-TREE-QPH PR F.F. EL.: ??.??' 0.85 ACRES 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-AR 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER C-PR-L -TREE -CV G IN 3 24x36 F.F. EL.: ??.??' C-PR-L-TREE-AR G LT C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L -TREE -CV PLANTING AREA G PP MCKEE ROAD F.H. 8 CITY OF DOVER 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH 5 5 24x36 G F.H . G 3 G PP 3 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH GS KENT COUNTY, DE GS 5 TO 24x36 1 24x36 GS C-PR-L-TREE-AR G C-PR-L-TREE-AR SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID CA 4 0.52 ACRES PY C-PR-L-TREE-QPH G RIPARIAN BUFFER 4 2 ED ITS . ± 24x36 PLANTING AREA 24x36 GS PA OS 24 U0NSQ.?F?T.??' PR OP 00 : G 10, . EL. 1 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-AR 3 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID CA F.F C-PR-L-TREE-PS SEWER PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS 24x36 24x36 BU G 3 C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-PS ILD GB ING 2 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH SHEET TITLE 3 2 PY 10 24x36 24x36 LT C-PR-L-TREE-QPH SEWER GS C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 1 0.26 ACRES CONCEPT C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-QPH RIPARIAN BUFFER C-PR-L-TREE-PS FCM PLANTING AREA G 1 C-PR-L -TREE -CV AS 3 EX. WETLANDS G LANDSCAPE PLAN C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID R SEWE 24x36 G C-PR-L-TREE-QPH GB 24x36 1 CR 8 LT C-PR-L-TREE-AR 3 C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS EX. WETLANDS F.H. SEWER G . PROPOSED BUILDING 9 . C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 24x36 PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS G 24x36 3 PS SC C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-AR 24x36 3 3 24x36 AR EX. 24 UNITS WETLANDS GS 9 G2 AS GB ADES AS 10,000 SQ.FT. ± 2 ROARI 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH G 24x36 SWM AREA CA C-PR-L-TREE-AR V G 0 25 50 100 F.F. EL.: ??.??' H H G IDT U .W 24x36 24x36 RO.O.W C-PR-L-TREE-QPH G C-PR-L-TREE-AR SCALE : 1" = 50' C-PR-L-TREE-PS 3 BO R -CV C-PR-L-TREE-PS -TREE C-PR-L C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER 24x36 24x36 24 2 D G G ISSUE BLOCK (R 10 24 U B F ,00 NIT UI 2 D. .F 0 S LD CR 24x36 N 24 . EL SQ.F ING 24x36 .: T O ? ?.?. ± G G .2 ?' E C-PR-L -TREE -CV 94 24 PO 24x36 ) S PR SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 24x36 24 O G 2 3 EX. G GS PP WETLANDS 24x36 24 1 24x36 G C-PR-L-TREE-QPH PA SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 1 . 24 30 ' B. 1 PA . . . 24x36 R. AS 24x36 SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID L. 1 D G MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 10 24 U B 1 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH LAYER STATE: L-101 F. ,000 NIT UIL 24 3 CR 3 PROJECT NO.: 2018217.00 F S D C-PR-L-TREE-QPH EL SQ.F G 24x36 GS C-PR-L-TREE-QPH . ING F.H. C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS 24x36 .: T DATE: 03/22/22 ?.?. ± 24 ? G C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS -CV -TREE C-PR-L ?' C-PR-L-TREE-QPH SE SCALE: 1" = 30' PR C-PR-L-TREE-QPH 1 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH O PO PA DRAWN BY: S.W.A PROJ. MGR.: J.N.S. 24x36 SHEET 3 FO GS L-101.1 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH 24x36 G 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH COPYRIGHT 2019 17 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2018\2018217\DWG\2018217-LSCAPE-C3D18.dwg, Mar 28, 2022 - 12:02pm .PDF 24x36 24x36 2022-03-28

Page 18

24x36 24x36 Item 2. CA 4 KEY MAP - MCKEE ROAD APPARTMENTS 24x36 PY 24x36 2 . . N PA H UG RO 24x36 L-106 L-104 1 24x36 BO C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID CA SEWER AR SC G 24x36 AD 24x36 RO L-103 1 L-105 ARCH I T E C TURE C-PR-L-TREE-PS 24x36 C-PR-L -TREE -CV AS 3 C-PR-L-TREE-PS EX. WETLANDS 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS 1 L-101 ENG I NE E R I NG CR 24x36 L-102 G Dover, DE 24x36 PROPOSED BUILDING 9 MCKEE ROAD 309 S. Governors Ave. Dover, DE 19904 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH SCALE: 1" = 750' Ph. 302.734.7950 24x36 Fax 302.734.7965 24x36 3 24 UNITS 9 Salisbury, MD AS GB 312 West Main St. Suite 300 10,000 SQ.FT. ± 24x36 24x36 2 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH G Salisbury, MD 21801 CA Ph. 410.546.9100 Fax 410.546.5824 F.F. EL.: ??.??' 24x36 24x36 Wilmington, NC C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-PS 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 24x36 3 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 24x36 Ph. 910.341.7600 C-PR-L-TREE-PS -CV -TREE C-PR-L C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER Fax 910.341.7506 G 24x36 2 www.beckermorgan.com 24x36 CR -CV -TREE C-PR-L 24x36 24x36 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER 30' B.R.L. G 3 2 24x36 G GS PP 24x36 1 G C-PR-L-TREE-QPH PA SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 1 24x36 1 PA 24x36 AS SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID D G 1 10 24 U B 1 F. ,000 NIT UIL CR 3 24x36 F EL SQ.F S D 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH G . ING F.H. C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS .: T ? ?.?. ± C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L -TREE -CV G ?' SE OP 24x36 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH 1 O PR PA 24x36 3 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH GS G C-PR-L-TREE-QPH EX. 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH WETLANDS 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH . N C-PR-L-TREE-QPH 24x36 G 24x36 7 30' B.R.L. GB 24x36 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH SWM AREA G 24x36 24x36 9 GB C-PR-L-TREE-QPH 3 FIP OE SWM AREA 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH PROJECT TITLE C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS G C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR OE C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH 1 3 24x36 GS AS OE OE MCKEE ROAD 24x36 24x36 3 G G G G G F.H. G G G G G OE G OE G APPARTMENTS 24x36 PA OE MCKEE ROAD C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH OE 24x36 1 OE CITY OF DOVER 24x36 GS OE KENT COUNTY, DE OE G OE 12 24x36 24x36 14 3 AS OE LT GB OE 24x36 OE 2 3 24x36 OE AS EX. WETLANDS PP OE C-PR-L-TREE-PS OE C-PR-L-TREE-PS 3 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS 24x36 FO 8 100' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK G LT 3 8 1 7 2 3 SHEET TITLE FO PP AS LT LT LT 24x36 PA 3 3 80' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK 24x36 PP PA 3 3 3 FO 3 3 3 CONCEPT C-PR-L-TREE-AR PP 30' B.R.L. PA PP PA 50' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK 50' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK C-PR-L-TREE-AR PP PA F.H. 24x36 FO C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR 30' B.R.L. 40' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK 30' B.R.L. 40' CORRIDOR OVERLAY SETBACK 30' B.R.L. LANDSCAPE PLAN 24x36 FO . C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR G C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR FO . C-PR-L-TREE-AR 24x36 24x36 FCM FCM FO FO FO FOOE FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO OE OE OE OE OE OE FO OE FO FO FO FO FO FO FO 24x36 FO FO FO FO 24x36 24" R.C.P. 24" R.C.P. OE INV: 41.93' INV: XX.XX' 24" R.C.P. 24" R.C.P. INV: 43.89' INV: 44.07' 24 24 24x36 G 24x36 OE 0 25 50 100 24x36 24x36 OE SCALE : 1" = 50' 24x36 24x36 ISSUE BLOCK G EX. SAN. MH.: ?? RIM EL.: 47.96' EX. C.B.: ?? EX. C.B.: ?? INV. IN: ??.??' GRATE: 47.72' GRATE: 49.34' INV. OUT: ??.??' INV. IN: ??.??' INV. IN: ??.??' 24x36 OE G G G G INV. OUT: ??.??' INV. OUT: ??.??' G 24x36 OE W.V. G G G G F.H. EX. 4"W G G G 24x36 G 24x36 G G 24x36 24x36 . . . . 24x36 24x36 G MARK DATE DESCRIPTION LAYER STATE: L-101 PROJECT NO.: 2018217.00 24x36 24x36 DATE: 03/22/22 SCALE: 1" = 30' DRAWN BY: S.W.A PROJ. MGR.: J.N.S. 24x36 24x36 SHEET 24x36 L-101.2 COPYRIGHT 2019 24x36 18 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2018\2018217\DWG\2018217-LSCAPE-C3D18.dwg, Mar 28, 2022 - 12:03pm .PDF 24x36 24x36 2022-03-28

Page 19

24x36 24x36 Item 2. KEY MAP - MCKEE ROAD APPARTMENTS FCM 24x36 24x36 . . N OE H OE UG OE RO OE 24x36 24x36 L-106 L-104 BO AR OE OE SC OE OE OE OE 24x36 AD OE OE 24x36 RO OE OE L-103 OE OE FCM 30 OE OE 24x36 L-105 OE OE OE OE ARCH I T E C TURE 24x36 8 OE L-101 LT C-PR-L-TREE-AR OE OE 30 OE ENG I NE E R I NG OE 20' B.R.L. 4 3 OE Dover, DE L-102 24x36 AS TO OE 24x36 MCKEE ROAD EX. OE 309 S. Governors Ave. WETLANDS OE Dover, DE 19904 SCALE: 1" = 750' C-PR-L-TREE-AR OE Ph. 302.734.7950 OE 20' B.R.L. 24x36 3 OE Fax 302.734.7965 24x36 3 GS Salisbury, MD PA 13 EX. WETLANDS 24x36 IN G 3 3 312 West Main St. Suite 300 24x36 ILD PS TO Salisbury, MD 21801 C-PR-L-TREE-AR D BUS G C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS Ph. 410.546.9100 Fax 410.546.5824 E NIT T. ± S 24 U SQ.F .??' 24x36 O C-PR-L-TREE-PS 24x36 OP 000 : ? ? Wilmington, NC PR 10, . EL. F.H. 5 3333 Jaeckle Drive, Suite 120 F.F C-PR-L-TREE-AR 24x36 PA Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 24x36 SEWE R C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID Ph. 910.341.7600 2 PROPOSED B Fax 910.341.7506 G AS UILDING 6 24 UNITS www.beckermorgan.com 10,000 SQ.FT 24x36 24x36 0.52 ACRES F.F. EL.: ??.?. ± C-PR-L-TREE-AR ING 5 RIPARIAN BUFFER PLANTING AREA ?' G 3 GS ILD C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID R GB SEWE 24x36 24x36 2 F.H. GS 5 BU E-CV L-TRE PA C-PR- C-PR-L-TREE-QPH G FCM C-PR-L-TREE-AR G F. G ED ITS . ± 24x36 24x36 2 SWM AREA G 2 -CV -TREE C-PR-L CR OS 4 UN Q.FT ??' C-PR-L-TREE-QPH G G AS C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEWER G OP 02,000 LS.: ??. -CV -TREE C-PR-L 2 0.85 ACRES 24x36 5 RIPARIAN BUFFER 24x36 CA C-PR-L-TREE-PS -CV -TREE 14 C-PR-L C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER PLANTING AREA PR C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-QPH PP 3 1 . E C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS ING EX. F WETLANDS 24x36 F.H. 24x36 G 3 SEW C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 4 ER 5 E IT . E-CV L-TRE C-PR- D CR ± GS PP 5 2 2 UIL 3 15 OS 24 UNSQ.FT.??' ? C-PR-L-TREE-AR G C-PR-L-TREE-AR LT 2 000 : ? AS G G CA UILDIN B -CV -TREE 24x36 C-PR-L 24x36 CR 10, . EL. 30' B.R 1 .L. D S 24 -CV -TREE 10,000UNITS C-PR-L CR F.F G 24x36 8 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEWE R 24x36 2 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER AS 12 5 F.F. E SQ.FT. ± C-PR-L-TREE-AR CA E-CV DING 7 L-TRE C-PR- 3 C-PR-L-TREE-PS TO B OP C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS ING G L.: ?? 2 C-PR-L-TREE-PS 24x36 24x36 OSED G G G PR CA .??' 3 EDUNITS.FT. ±?' C-PR-L-TREE-AR D GS C-PR-L-TREE-AR SWM AREA . IL ? 1 N PROPOSED BUIL 000 : ? 3 5 BU 24x36 -CV 24x36 S -TREE C-PR-L CR 10, . EL. PROP LT 3 PS 24 UNITS SEWE O 24 SQ .? R C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID C-PR-L -TREE -CV GS F.F C-PR-L-TREE-PS 24x36 G 24x36 G 5 4 1 SC G3 2 C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-AR GS 2 CA G C-PR-L-TREE-AR PP C-PR-L-TREE-PS LT CR 3 G AR -CV -TREE C-PR-L -TREE -CV CR TO C-PR-L-TREE-PS OP C-PR-L -CV -TREE C-PR-L AD 24x36 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-PS 2 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID E-CV L-TRE SEW C-PR- ER PR ROARIES C-PR-L-TREE-AR 1 CA 1 24x36 AS PA 24x36 2 1 PROJECT TITLE H HV 3 G 3 C-PR-L-TREE-AR CA C-PR- L-TRE E-CV CR UGWIDT -CV -TREE C-PR-L SIRC G CR TO 16 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID R SEWE 2 24x36 RO .W. CR C-PR-L -TREE -CV 3 G C-PR-L-TREE-AR MCKEE ROAD 24x36 BO R.O ING SWM AREA C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS 3 G F.H. C-PR-L-TREE-PS 3 C-PR-L -TREE -CV APPARTMENTS EDUNITS.FT. ±?' C-PR-L-TREE-PS 24x36 TO 3 2 D GS 24x36 3 -CV -TREE AS C-PR-L 2 IL CA (R ? 000 : ? TO MCKEE ROAD BU 3 CA S G 2 10, . EL. D. 3 G PS G C-PR-L -TREE -CV CR CITY OF DOVER O 24 SQ .? 24x36 PS 1 24x36 NO PA F.F KENT COUNTY, DE C-PR-L-TREE-PS G C-PR-L-TREE-PS 4 C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS 2 .2 -CV -TREE G GS C-PR-L C-PR-L-TREE-PS 11 CR C-PR-L-TREE-PS 94 24x36 24x36 5 3 OP ING ) TO 2 AS 2 1 CA G D PR CR PROPOSED BUILDING 3 D S ± CA -CV -TREE C-PR-L IL 24x36 G 24x36 SE24 UNSIQT .FT..??' BU PROPOSED BUILDING 4 00 : C-PR-L-TREE-AR O 10, . EL. -CV -TREE C-PR-L C-PR-L-TREE-QPH 24x36 24x36 P C-PR-L-TREE-AR 24 UNITS 3 F F. ?? 6 CR 1 0 24 UNITS SHEET TITLE C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-AR GB CA 10,000 SQ.FT. ± 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-AR G C-PR-L -TREE -CV 24x36 G 7 SEWE R C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID O LT C-PR-L-TREE-QPH SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 10,000 SQ.FT. ± C-PR-L-TREE-QPH CONCEPT PR F.F. EL.: ??.??' 0.85 ACRES LANDSCAPE PLAN C-PR-L-TREE-AR RIPARIAN BUFFER 1 F.F. EL.: ??.??' 24x36 24x36 PLANTING AREA -CV -TREE C-PR-L C-PR-L-TREE-AR G C-PR-L-TREE-AR LT C-PR-L-TREE-AR F.H. . 5 . C-PR-L-TREE-QPH 24x36 24x36 . G G PP 3 G F.H 3 C-PR-L-TREE-QPH GS 5 TO GS C-PR-L-TREE-AR 24x36 24x36 C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEW ER C-PR-L-TREE-AR 0.52 ACRES C-PR-L-TREE-QPH G RIPARIAN BUFFER 4 ED ITS . ± PLANTING AREA GS OS 24 U0NSQ.?F?T.??' 24x36 24x36 PR OP 00 : G 0 25 50 100 10, . EL. C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-AR 3 F.F C-PR-L-TREE-PS PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS BU 24x36 24x36 3 C-PR-L-TREE-AR C-PR-L-TREE-PS ILD GB ING 2 SCALE : 1" = 50' C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH 3 2 PY 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-AR 10 0.26 ACRES SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID C-PR-L-TREE-QPH C-PR-L-TREE-QPH GS LT ISSUE BLOCK 24x36 FCM RIPARIAN BUFFER G PLANTING AREA G C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID SEWE R 1 24x36 G C-PR-L-TREE-QPH GB 24x36 8 C-PR-L-TREE-AR EX. WETLANDS LT F.H. 3 C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS SEWER C-PR-U-SEWER-MH-4ID 24x36 PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS C-PR-L-TREE-PS G 24x36 3 PS SC C-PR-L-TREE-AR 3 AR 24x36 EX. 9 24x36 WETLANDS GS G2 AS ADES AS . ROARI . . . 24x36 SWM AREA 24x36 C-PR-L-TREE-AR G MARK DATE DESCRIPTION V LAYER STATE: L-101 H H G IDT PROJECT NO.: 2018217.00 24x36 U .W 24x36 RO.O.W C-PR-L-TREE-AR G DATE: 03/22/22 BO R SCALE: 1" = 30' DRAWN BY: S.W.A PROJ. MGR.: J.N.S. 24x36 24x36 24 D G (R 2 10 24 U B F ,00 NI UI SHEET D. . F 0 T S L D . EL SQ.F ING L-101 24 24x36 N .: T 24x36 O ? ?.?. ± G G .2 FCM ?' E PO COPYRIGHT 2019 19 94 S F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2018\2018217\DWG\2018217-LSCAPE-C3D18.dwg, Mar 28, 2022 - 12:01pm O .PDF 24x36 24x36 ) PR 2022-03-28

Page 20

Item 2. 20

Page 21

Item 2. 21

Page 22

Item 2. 22

Page 23

Item 2. April 1, 2022 Mrs. Samantha Bulkilvish Planner, City of Dover Department of Planning and Inspections P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903-0475 PLANNING OUR CLIENTS’ SUCCESS RE: Parks and Recreation / Planning Commission Request MCKEE ROAD APARTMENTS Dover, Delaware 2018217.00 Dear Mrs. Bulkilvish: On behalf of the applicant and owner, as we have previously discussed, we are hereby submitting the requested appraisal for the property as well as an updated calculation and detail for the picnic areas shown on the plans. With 384 total units development, the City’s Code requires 105,600 square feet of active recreation area. The Project is proposing approximately 12,000 square feet of Active Recreation area in the form of a Pool and Clubhouse facility. Additionally, the project proposes roughly, 20275 linear feet of walking paths at 6’ wide, a manicured flat field for active recreation @ 28,000 sqft as well as seven (7) gilling stations and picnic areas @1900 sqft throughout the development. The total active recreation space for the complex equates to roughly 74,135 square feet, which is short of the 105,600 sq. ft. required by code. This leaves a balance of +/- 31,465 sqft. We will be requesting that the balance be accounted for by a fee in leu contribution for the remaining Active Recreation. By our calculations, this equates to roughly $31,465. Please contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, BECKER MORGAN GROUP, INC. BECKER MORGAN GROUP, INC. ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING 309 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVENUE Jonathan N. H. Street DOVER, DE 19904 302.734.7950 Associate FAX 302.734.7965 JNS/ PORT EXCHANGE SUITE 300 312 WEST MAIN STREET Enclosures SALISBURY, MD 21801 410.546.9100 cc: Bill Krapf, LC Management FAX 410.546.5824 201821700av-COD-ltr.docx ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING SUITE 211 3205 RANDALL PARKWAY WILMINGTON, NC 28403 910.341.7600 FAX 910.342.7506 www.beckermorgan.com 23

Page 24

Item 2. 24

Page 25

Item 2. 25

Page 26

Item 2. 26

Page 27

Item 2. 27

Page 28

Item 2. April 6, 2022 Mrs. Samantha Bulkilvish Planner, City of Dover Department of Planning and Inspections P.O. Box 475 Dover, DE 19903-0475 PLANNING OUR CLIENTS’ SUCCESS RE: Parks and Recreation / Planning Commission Request MCKEE ROAD APARTMENTS Dover, Delaware 2018217.00 Dear Mrs. Bulkilvish: In response to the Parks and Recreation Committee report received in our office April 5, 2022, we would like to offer an additional narrative to our previous submission in hopes to clarify some of the concerns raised in the report. Specifically, item no. 2 within the Staff Recommendations. Item no. 2 addresses some items which the planning department deems would be beneficial to the active recreation plan for the development. These items include further development of the clubhouse and pool, walking trail clarifications, turf field amenities, bicycle parking, pedestrian connectivity, and lastly age-based amenities. We would like to offer these clarifications to the plan, addressing the issues one by one. Club house and Pool Area: As the clubhouse and pool area are still being developed, the owner has agreed to provide staff with some examples of the developer’s recent clubhouses on other projects to give staff a visual on the scale and materials of the structure as well as providing an additional narrative on the clubhouse space and how it would be utilized. The owner’s representative has agreed to provide these details under a separate cover. Concrete walking trails: The staff recommendation of provide alternative materials rather than concrete in the areas closer to the wetland buffers. This idea has previously been discussed BECKER MORGAN GROUP, INC. among the design team and was intended to be integrated into the construction documents. It is our intention to utilize a stone dust type trail material in the areas leading up to and away from the ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING more sensitive areas closer to the wetland buffers. Concrete would be utilized adjacent to drive 309 SOUTH GOVERNORS isles, and in and amongst the buildings farther from the buffered areas. As discussed at the DAC AVENUE meeting 4/6/2022, providing waste bag dispensers, and benches along the walking trails can DOVER, DE 19904 certainly be added to the plan and will be placed appropriately. Benches can and will also be 302.734.7950 FAX 302.734.7965 placed in the area of the manicured turf field. The landscape plan will be adjusted to both make accommodations for the fire access road as discussed with the City Fire Marshal as well as an PORT EXCHANGE attempt to provide more shade trees on the south side of the field. Additionally, the pedestrian SUITE 300 connectivity comments with regard to the extension of the sidewalk to the clubhouse and 312 WEST MAIN STREET SALISBURY, MD 21801 placement a crosswalk to the right of building 10 can and will be addressed in the plans. 410.546.9100 FAX 410.546.5824 Bicycle Parking facilities are required by code and will be provided on the plan in locations both convenient to the apartment residents and amenities. Bike facilities will also be located adjacent ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING to the club house and the playing field. Indoor storage of bicycles can be achieved by the use of SUITE 211 the storage locker located on each apartment balcony. 3205 RANDALL PARKWAY WILMINGTON, NC 28403 Shade structures, physical fitness stations and children's playgrounds are not intended to be 910.341.7600 FAX 910.342.7506 included on the plans currently. As the developer is the owner and operator of hundreds of communities and pride themselves on tenant retention and satisfaction, additional amenities www.beckermorgan.com 28

Page 29

Item 2. March 23, 2022 McKee Road Apartments Page 2 would be provided as the market and tenants demanded. As such, the items listed above do not account for a great deal of additional square footage beyond what is already accounted for in our calculation for fee in leu. With the adjustments listed above, the noted deficiencies amount to a possible shade structure, some exercise station, and a playground. We respectfully request that staff amend its statement in the report that the plan “does not comply with the purpose statement of Article 5”. While we understand the request, we would submit that these additional specific amenities mentioned in the report would be future maintenance issues, as well as possible liability concerns for the management of the facility. Please contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, BECKER MORGAN GROUP, INC. Jonathan N. H. Street Associate JNS/ Enclosures cc: Bill Krapf, LC Management 201821700ax-COD-ltr.docx 29

Page 30

Item 3. Delaware Healthy Food Retail Initiative: Kent County April 12, 2022 30

Page 31

Item 3. Delaware Dept. of Agriculture, the Delaware Farm and Food Council, and the University of Delaware Extension are teaming up with communities and state/local partners to improve healthy food retail access in Delaware 2020 - 2021 2021 - 2022 2022 - 2023 and beyond Community Engagement Pilot Launch and Asset Development Mapping 31

Page 32

Item 3. The Delaware Healthy Food Retail Initiative Increased inclusion and Support for farmers and Improved collaboration equity businesses in Delaware and capacity Increased purchasing Connect with and Statewide as well as and consumption of support complementary tailored community- nutritious foods efforts level efforts 32

Page 33

Delaware Food Retail Survey Item 3. • 5-15 minutes • English and Spanish versions • Online survey via Qualtrics • Tablet • Computer / laptop • Smart phone • The survey uses a variety of question formats; it uses various types of checks, logic, and carry-through responses • Priority population: • Delaware residents • 18+ • People at risk for nutrition insecurity 33

Page 34

Survey Sections Item 3. Demographics Supermarkets Convenience Dollar Stores Pharmacies Farms, Online SNAP & WIC Help Us What Other / Corner Farmers Shopping Prioritize Services Are Stores Markets, and Needed? Farm Stands 34

Page 35

Two Initial Pilot Locations Item 3. Dover and Harrington, Delaware Dover, DE 1 Urban and suburban Service members and families / AFB Harrington, DE  Small town 2  Rural 35

Page 36

The destination can be a residence or Pilot in Development participating community site, where people Item 3. receive (or pick up) their pre-ordered bags or boxes. Example: Seasonal produce buying club operating out of a place of worship, firehouse, or shelter. Food is purchased for Logistics software links Volunteers pick up the food, wholesale distribution to community volunteers with and drive it directly to its final customer(s) or store(s), or “tickets”; these tickets identify destination, in <30 minutes identified for discount resale. food in need of pick up and end-to-end. delivery; route optimization ensures efficiency and food safety in transit. The destination can be a small grocery store or market, which then sells the foods in their store that they purchased wholesale. Example: A small store purchases fresh local 36 produce wholesale from a larger grocery store.

Page 37

Sources of Food: Item 3. Delaware’s Diverse Producers and Food Businesses Direct from the farm Urban farm or community garden Farmers market or farm stand Supermarket Rural or independent Wholesaler or grocery store produce distributor 37

Page 38

Recipients of Food: Item 3. Delaware Residents, Community Sites, and Small Businesses Drop-off directly to individuals or Drop-off to rural or families at their homes independent grocery stores for them to then stock/sell Drop-off at local community site timed with a community pick-up, for example: Firehall Place of Worship Community Room 38 (Apartments, Senior Center, etc)

Page 39

Complementary Programming: Item 3. Nutrition, Health, and Wellness | Community Cohesion Nutrition & Cooking Lessons Community Health Education & Outreach Health Screenings Meet Your Farmer Live Music Children’s Events 39

Page 40

Also Exploring: Item 3. Door Dash’s Government &/or Nonprofit Partnership 40

Page 41

Item 4. ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee MEETING DATE: 04/12/2022 DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Clerk’s Office on Behalf of Councilman Boggerty and Councilwoman Arndt PREPARED BY: Rachel Engle, Assistant City Clerk DATE SUBMITTED: 04/05/2022 SUBJECT: Proposed Categorization of Williams Park and Division and Kirkwood Streets Parks as Safe Haven Parks RELATED PROJECT: None APPROVALS: CCW, Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee and City Council EXHIBITS: N/A EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: N/A AMOUNT BUDGETED: N/A FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget) N/A TIMETABLE: Consideration by Council Committee of the Whole/Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee on April 12, 2022 / Council’s consideration of Committee’s recommendation on April 28, 2022. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approval of categorizing Williams Park and Division and Kirkwood Streets Park as Safe Haven Parks. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Categorizing Williams Park (east side of the city) and Division and Kirkwood Streets Park (west side of the city) as Safe Haven Parks will honor victims and survivors of domestic violence, child abuse, and sexual assault and will serve as a place where the victims and survivors are honored for their strength and perseverance and also will allow them to create new memories and begin to heal. Williams Park and Division and Kirkwood Streets Park will be marked with a sign declaring each park as a Safe Haven with increased police patrol in the area. At a later date, a dedication of the parks will be scheduled to include community organizations to offer support and services. S:\CAFS\04-12-2022 P&R Safe Haven Parks.wpd 41

Page 42

Item 12. ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole – Legislative, Finance & Administration DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Electric DATE SUBMITTED: March 14, 2022 PREPARED BY: Paul Waddell, Electric Director SUBJECT: Evaluation of Proposals – SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) Equipment and Technology Upgrade REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: CIP – EE2202 – SCADA Master Hardware Replacement REVIEWED BY: Dave Hugg, City Manager; Lori Peddicord, Controller EXHIBITS: City of Dover SCADA Upgrade Ranking Sheets EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Approx. $541,000 (for License, Software & Hardware) AMOUNT BUDGETED: $550,000 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Electric Engineering / Page 152 – FY 2021-2022 TIMETABLE: Orders to be placed upon final approval by City Council RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends purchasing the SCADA Master software from Survalent and utilizing IT department to purchase the required hardware. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS This request is to fund the replacement of the existing Siemens Power TG Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Master Hardware/Software currently in use. This is due to the support for that platform being discontinued by the manufacturer due to the age of the product as well as the support for the hardware used to run the software. It should be noted that the system runs continuously (twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week) to monitor and track anomalies in the electrical and some aspects of the water system. Due to this being a wholesale change from the existing software system, the city worked with Quad3, a consultant knowledgeable in the drafting of proposals of this type. There was an initial pre-qualification screening sent to five (5) companies to validate if they did or did not meet the specifications and they all did. The Request for Proposal was solicited and advertised per the City Purchasing Policy by the Procurement Manager, posted on the City website, and sent directly to five (5) vendors that met the pre-qualification criteria. Siemens withdrew their pursuit due to not being able to support the windows-based system requirements and Hitachi (ABB) did not submit a proposal. The vendors hosted live demonstrations of the qualifying systems and the consultant, IT and Electric Department personnel were able to ask questions of the company. OSI, QEI and Survalent were demonstrated and proved very capable to perform the required tasks needed and offered a wide range of improvements from the current system. Of the three, Survalent was deemed to be the best option and was also the lowest cost with a base cost of $345,000. This is 20% less than QEI and over 39% less than OSI and when the additional options of mobile crew manager, AMI interface, OMS and public facing portals are included Survalent is still the lowest cost. It is the recommendation of staff and Quad3 that Survalent be awarded this contract to provide the SCADA upgrade to the City. 42

Page 43

Item 12. RFP 22-0019EL Procurement of Equipment and Services for SCADA System Master Station Upgrade Ranking Sheet Name: Jamie Sack OSI QEI Survalent Letter of Interest 0 - 10 10 10 10 Project Understanding, Approach, Sys. Details 0 - 30 26 18 25 Bill of Material for Software and Major Equipment 0 - 10 9 6 9 Project Team/Key Personnel 0 - 10 9 7 9 Overall Qualifications of Firm/Team 0 - 10 9 6 9 Bid Form, Bid Breakdown, and Supplemental Info. 0 - 20 12 15 19 On-Site Demonstration and Presentation 0 - 20 19 14 18 Total (0 - 110 points) 110 94 76 99 Name: Ed Sullivan OSI QEI Survalent Letter of Interest 0 - 10 10 10 10 Project Understanding, Approach, Sys. Details 0 - 30 26 18 24 Bill of Material for Software and Major Equipment 0 - 10 9 6 8 Project Team/Key Personnel 0 - 10 9 7 9 Overall Qualifications of Firm/Team 0 - 10 9 7 9 Bid Form, Bid Breakdown, and Supplemental Info. 0 - 20 12 16 19 On-Site Demonstration and Presentation 0 - 20 18 14 18 Total (0 - 110 points) 110 93 78 97 43

Page 44

Item 12. Name: ________________________________________ Shawn Burgett OSI QEI Survalent Letter of Interest 0 - 10 10 10 10 Project Understanding, Approach, Sys. Details 0 - 30 25 20 26 Bill of Material for Software and Major Equipment 0 - 10 8 5 8 Project Team/Key Personnel 0 - 10 9 9 9 Overall Qualifications of Firm/Team 0 - 10 9 7 8 Bid Form, Bid Breakdown, and Supplemental Info. 0 - 20 15 13 19 On-Site Demonstration and Presentation 0 - 20 18 15 18 Total (0 - 110 points) 110 94 79 98 Bid Summary Bid Item No. 1 1 $ 186,200.00 $ 176,505.00 $ 195,000.00 Bid Item No. 2 2 $ 244,950.00 $ 234,586.00 $ 150,000.00 Support (2 year) 3 $ 49,482.00 Included Included Total Base Bid 4 $ 480,632.00 $ 411,091.00 $ 345,000.00 Support Level 5 Gold Silver Mobile Crew 9 $ 95,000.00 $ 31,250.00 $ 35,794.00 AMI Interface No Price Included No Price Included $ 6,600.00 AVL Interface No Price Included No Price Included $ 4,400.00 OMS Dashboard 12 Included See MCC $ 22,242.00 Public Outage Portal 16 $ 24,500.00 See MCC $ 22,044.00 $ 4,470.00 Included Included with with MultiSpeak Software Modules $ 3,000.00 Modules Est. Total w/ Preferred Options 19 $ 600,132.00 $ 445,341.00 $ 440,550.00 44

Page 45

Item 13. ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of The Whole (Legislative, Finance and Administration) DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Planning & Community Development DATE SUBMITTED: 4/4/22 PREPARED BY: Tracey Harvey SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) proposed grant recommendations for multi-year approved CDBG projects REFERENCE: N/A RELATED PROJECT: N/A REVIEWED BY: N/A EXHIBITS: Proposed budget for CDBG recommendations EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $300,000 AMOUNT BUDGETED: $300,000 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): CDBG Entitlement Grant TIME TIMETABLE: Pending Council approval, CDBG grant agreements will be prepared for execution and initiation of projects effective 7/1/22. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award $300,000 in CDBG funds to sub-grantees to carry out approved CDBG activities. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Community Development Staff has provided the proposed Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocation recommendations for the FY 2022 CDBG grant renewal fiscal year. The proposed grant funding recommendations will be allocated to the sub-grantees that were awarded multi-year grants from the approved 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. The proposed grant allocation for fiscal year 2022 is being estimated due to the notice received form the Department of Housing and Urban Development stating that formula allocations will not be available until May 13th. Staff has estimated the proposed budget at $300,000. Twenty percent (20%) of the grant will be used for program administration to manage the CDBG program and up to fifteen percent (15%) of the grant will be applied towards public service activities not to exceed $45,000 Staff is requesting to include a contingency provision in its Action Plan to adjust the proposed budget from the estimated funding levels to match the actual allocation amounts as close to the proposed budget as possible to eliminate the need for additional publications and the citizen participation process in order to submit the final plan to HUD by May 24, 2022. Adjustments will be to the Homeownership Assistance Program with either an increase or decreased amount to total the actual allocation. Adjustments will only be made to public service activities if the 15% cap is lower than $45,000. 45

Page 46

Item 13. The following activities are projects to be funded with proposed recommended funding allocations by staff. Homeownership Assistance Program The city will provide settlement assistance up to $20,000.00 to assist up to 5 low to moderate income persons that are first time homebuyers purchase affordable housing in the City of Dover. Grant Request: $100,000 Recommended funded amount: $100,000 Program Administration CDBG funds will be used to oversee management, monitoring and coordination of the CDBG program in the City of Dover. Twenty percent 20% of the total grant allocation will be used to fund program administration. Recommended funded amount: $60,000 Dover Interfaith Mission for Housing CDBG funds will be used for operation costs for the building that will include utility and maintenance costs. This project is a public service activity and subject to the 15% cap requirement. Grant Request: $30,000 Recommended funded amount: $30,000 Central Delaware Housing Collaborative CDBG funds will be used for operations costs for a women’s shelter. This project is a public service activity and subject to the 15% cap requirement. Grant Request: $20,000 Recommended funded amount: $15,000 Milford Housing Development Corporation (Emergency Home Repairs) CDBG funds will be used to complete emergency home repairs for single family residential owner-occupied housing units that are found to be in violation of the City’s Housing Code. This project will serve between 5-15 low-income households. Grant Request: $40,000 Recommended funded amount: $40,000 Milford Housing Development Corporation (Homeowner Rehabilitation) CDBG funds will be used to rehabilitate single-family owner-occupied housing units that are found to be in violation of the City’s Housing Code. This project will service between 2-3 low-income households. Grant Request: $60,000 Recommended funded amount: $55,000 46

Page 47

Item 14. SPONSOR: Rep. Lynn & Rep. Bush & Sen. Bonini HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE BILL AN ACT TO AMEND THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF DOVER RELATING TO STAFFING OF THE CITY POLICE FORCE. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE (Two-thirds of all members elected to each house thereof concurring therein): 1 Section 1. Amend § 53 of the Charter of the City of Dover by making deletions as shown by strike through and 2 insertions as shown by underline as follows: 3 Sec. 53. Police; mayor to be conservator of peace. 4 (a) There shall be a city police force, the number thereof and their salaries shall be determined by the council, but 5 they shall be chosen and appointed by the mayor. The mayor is hereby vested with all the powers of a conservator of the 6 peace within the city limits. The Mayor shall appoint a Chief of Police subject to removal at any time by the Mayor in 7 accordance with applicable laws. The members of the police force shall be subject to his/her direction and orders delivered 8 through the proper chain of command and in accordance with applicable laws and ordinances. They shall preserve peace 9 and order, and compel obedience within the city limits to the ordinances of the city and the laws of the state. They shall 10 have such other duties as the council and the mayor shall prescribe by ordinance. 11 (b) Each member of the police force shall be vested with all the power and authority within the city limits and 12 within one mile outside of said limits, (and, in the case of the pursuit of an offender, without limit) of a constable of Kent 13 County. 14 (c)(1) The Mayor shall cause to be conducted a review of the city police force to determine the appropriate staffing 15 necessary to effectively meet the demand for police services. The Mayor shall ensure the review is completed not later than 16 February 1 of each fifth year beginning February 1, 2023. 17 (2) The Mayor shall select an independent entity to conduct the review required under paragraph (c)(1) of this 18 section. 19 (3) The independent entity shall review and determine the appropriate staffing necessary for the city police 20 force using an approach adopted by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies. 21 (4) The city manager shall, at a minimum, include in the annual budget required to be submitted to the council 22 under Section 44 of this Charter the following: Page 1 of 2 47 LC : MJC : CM Draft: 04/05/2022 09:35 AM 4801510165

Page 48

Item 14. 23 a. For the annual budget prepared in 2023 through 2027, 80% of the staffing recommended based on the 24 review required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section and sufficient funding to support that staffing. 25 b. For the annual budget prepared in 2028 through 2032, 90% of the staffing recommended based on the 26 review required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section and sufficient funding to support that staffing. 27 c. For the annual budget prepared in 2033 and after, 100% of the staffing recommended based on the 28 review required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section and sufficient funding to support that staffing. 29 (5) The council shall, at a minimum, adopt the staffing and funding recommendation contained in the annual 30 budget submitted by the city manager under paragraph (c)(4) of this section. SYNOPSIS This Act requires a quinquennial review of the City of Dover’s police force to determine the appropriate staffing necessary to effectively meet the demand for police services. The review must then, at a minimum, be the basis for the staffing and funding recommendation in the City’s annual budget prepared by the City manager, as follows: (1) For the annual budget prepared in 2023 through 2027, 80% of the staffing recommended based on the review required under this Act and sufficient funding to support that staffing. (2) For the annual budget prepared in 2028 through 2032, 90% of the staffing recommended based on the review required under this Act and sufficient funding to support that staffing. (3) For the annual budget prepared in 2033 and after, 100% of the staffing recommended based on the review required under this Act and sufficient funding to support that staffing. The City Council must, at a minimum, adopt the staffing and funding recommendation in the annual budget. This Act requires a greater than majority vote for passage because § 1 of Article IX of the Delaware Constitution requires the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members elected to each house of the General Assembly to amend a municipal charter. Page 2 of 2 48 LC : MJC : CM Draft: 04/05/2022 09:35 AM 4801510165

Page 49

Item 15. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DOVER and ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, Inc. WHEREAS, the City of Dover, herein referred to as City and St. Francis Hospital, Inc. referred to as Contractor have an agreement (“Agreement”) that was signed the 22nd day of January 2019 and became effective April 1, 2019 with the understanding that Contractor is to provide Emergency Medical Services to the City. WHEREAS the Agreement states that the City of Dover has the option to extend the contract two additional, one (1) year terms. (pg. 8 letter B in the Agreement). This confirms that the City is exercising its option to extend the Agreement for one year. NOW THEREFORE, the City and Contractor hereby agree that: 1. Renewal of the Agreement for one year terminating on March 31, 2023. 2. City will compensate Contractor at the rate of $100,000 annually paid in monthly installments of $8530 a month, with the March payment being $8150 a month. Coverage will remain the same (or increases but cannot decrease) as in the Agreement. 3. Contractor may terminate the Agreement without cause upon no less than ninety (90) days’ notice. 4. All other terms of the Agreement remain. ATTEST: THE CITY OF DOVER By: Witness City Manager Date: ATTEST: ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC. By: James L. Woodward President Date: 49

Page 50

Item 15. 50

Page 51

Item 15. 51

Page 52

Item 15. 52

Page 53

Item 15. 53

Page 54

Item 15. 54

Page 55

Item 15. 55

Page 56

Item 15. 56

Page 57

Item 15. XVII. TERMS, REVIEW, TERMINATION, AND ASSIGNMENT A. Term-The term of this agreement shall be for three (3) years unless terminated by the City for cause. The City will review the Contractor's performance on an ongoing basis throughout the term of this agreement. If, at any time, in the judgment of the City, the Contractor shall fail to fulfill any of its obligations under this agreement in a timely and proper manner or if the Contractor shall violate any of the terms of this agreement, the City shall have the right, in its reasonable discretion, to terminate this agreement. Prior to any such termination, the City shall provide written notice via e-mail and regular (USPS) mail to Contractor stating with specificity the alleged service failures or violations giving rise to the termination. Contractor and City agree to meet for a period of time not-to exceed ten (10) business days to discuss the reasons for the City's notice of termination, and shall attempt in good faith to resolve their issues in a way that preserves this agreement. Contractor shall have fourteen (14) days thereafter to address and correct the service failures or violations to the City's reasonable satisfaction before the termination becomes effective. The failure of the City to exercise any right under this agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the right to exercise the same right or any other right at any time. The contractor will give the City ninety (90) days' written notice of its intent to terminate this contract. The Contractor agrees to provide Emergency Medical Services to the City of Dover at a cost of $100,000 per year for the three (3) year term of the contract. Payments will be made in equal monthly installments of $8,350 from April 1 through February 1 of the following year. The March payment each year will be $8,150. All monthly payments shall be received by Contractor not later than the 15th day of each subsequent month. B. Contract period may be extended by the City of Dover for two (2) additional one (1) year terms if contractor agrees to hold the prices as negotiated. If such an extension occurs, it will be agreed upon by both St. Francis and The City of Dover in written documentation. C. Assignment - Contractor shall not assign any portion of this agreement or the services to be rendered thereunder without first obtaining written consent of the City. Any assignment made contrary to the provisions of this Section shall serve to terminate this Agreement at the option of the City. D. Effective Date-This contract shall become effective on the pt day of April 2019 and shall be in full force and effect for a period of three (3 years, terminating on the 31st of March 2022 unless otherwise extended by the City of Dover for the additional two (2) year option. This contract is subject to the Charter and ordinances of the City of Dover, Delaware and all applicable State and Federal laws. XVIII. EMPLOYMENT The Contractor shall be an equal opportunity employer, and as such, shall select employees on the basis of qualifications without regard to age, race, marital status, genetic Page 8 of 11 57

Page 58

Item 15. 58

Page 59

Item 15. 59

Page 60

Item 15. 60

Page 61

Item 15. 61

Page 62

Item 15. 62

Page 63

Item 15. 63

Page 64

Item 15. 64

Page 65

Item 15. 65

Page 66

Item 15. 66

Page 67

Item 15. 67

Page 68

Item 15. 68

Page 69

Item 15. 69

Page 70

Item 15. 70

Page 71

Item 15. 71

Page 72

Item 15. 72

Page 73

Item 15. 73

Page 74

Item 15. 74

Page 75

Item 15. 75

Page 76

Item 15. 76

Page 77

Item 15. 77

Page 78

Item 15. 78

Page 79

Item 15. 79

Page 80

Item 15. 80

Page 81

Item 15. 81

Page 82

Item 15. 82

Page 83

Item 15. 83

Page 84

Item 15. 84

Page 85

Item 15. 85

Page 86

Item 15. 86

Page 87

Item 15. 87

Page 88

Item 16. ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Finance Department DATE SUBMITTED: April 12, 2022 PREPARED BY: Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer SUBJECT: Evaluation of Proposals – Fiscal Years 2022 – 2026 Audit Services REFERENCE: Professional Auditing Services – RFP 22-0029FN RELATED PROJECT: REVIEWED BY: Tracey Lisiecki, Financial Reporting & Accounting Manager EXHIBITS: Cost Comparisons – Exhibit A EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $263,595 (5 Years) FY22 $49,703 AMOUNT BUDGETED: $62,000 FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget) : 100-16-23-99-000-53031- Contractual Services TIMETABLE: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of SB & Company, LLC for the audit services contract not to exceed the fixed price as provided in Exhibit A Proposal dated March 22, 2022 The City of Dover Finance Department solicited proposals of professional accounting firms for the annual audit services on February 22, 2022. On March 22, 2022 the City received three (3) proposals in response to the Request for Proposal. All proposals contained the mandatory elements. The proposal for Barbacane Thornton & Company qualifies as a local preference and proposes six (6) personnel on the engagement and allocating 440 hours with onsite presence The proposal submitted by CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP proposes five (5) personnel on the engagement allocating 408 hours with much of the legwork done by City Staff as they take a hybrid approach of part-time onsite presence. The proposal submitted by SB & Company LLC qualifies as a minority preference and proposes to have at least nine (9) personnel on the engagement allocating 368 hours including a top down approach resulting in greater partner involvement throughout the engagement and promising minimal procedures performed after the close of fieldwork. The results of the Finance Department review of evaluations are as indicated in the Exhibit A attached. 88

Page 89

Item 16. Exhibit A RFP 22-0029FN FIRMS Barbacane SB & Thornton & CliftonLarson Company Co. Allen LLP LLC WEIGHT EVALUATION CRITERIA FACTOR MANDATORY ELEMENTS (mark with x) The audit firm is independent and licensed to practice in Delaware. X X X X The firm has no conflict of interest with regard to any other work performed by the firm for State or Kent County X X X X The firm's professional personnel have received adequate continuing professional education within the preceding two (2) years. X X X X The firm submits a copy of its last external quality control review report and the firm has a record of quality audit work. X X X X TECHNICAL QUALITY-EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE The firm's past experience and performance on comparable government of engagement. 20 18 18 20 The quality of the firm's professional personnel to be assigned to the engagement and the quality of the firm's management support personnel to be available for technical consultant. 20 18 19 20 AUDIT APPROACH Adequacy of proposal staffing plan for various segments of the engagement. 10 9 7 10 Adequacy of sampling techniques. 10 10 10 10 Adequacy of analytical procedures. 10 10 10 10 TOTAL 70 64 63 70 PRICE 30 22 19 30 GRAND TOTAL 100 86 82 100 Audit Services RFP 22-0029FN Cost Comparisons 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Barbacane Thornton & Co $60,000 $60,750 $61,500 $62,250 $63,000 Total with 3% Local Preference $58,200 $58,928 $59,655 $60,383 $61,110 CliftonLarsonAllen LLP Total $ 61,142 $ 62,905 $ 64,720 $ 66,576 $ 68,513 SB & Company LLC $51,240 $52,778 $54,324 $55,907 $57,498 Total with 3% Minority Preference $49,703 $51,195 $52,694 $54,230 $55,773 89

Page 90

Item 17. City of Dover Post Retirement Benefit Liabilities As of July 1, 2021 for the Plan Year June 30, 2022 General Pension General Fund Water Fund Wastewater Fund Electric Fund City Total Funding Liability $ 38,689,779 $ 3,531,370 $ 1,189,828 $ 22,856,986 $ 66,267,963 Actuarial Value of Assets (22,761,096) (2,385,810) (1,586,210) (20,550,832) (47,283,948) Unfunded Liability $ 15,928,683 $ 1,145,560 $ (396,382) $ 2,306,154 $ 18,984,015 Funded % 58.83% 67.56% 133.31% 89.91% 71.35% Normal Cost $ 155,714 $ 22,620 $ - $ 45,443 $ 223,777 Amortization Payment 2,237,291 183,977 - 390,531 2,811,799 Interest at 6.5% 155,545 13,429 - 28,338 197,312 Actuarially Determined Contribution $ 2,548,550 $ 220,026 $ - $ 464,312 $ 3,232,888 Estimated Applicable Payroll $ 2,981,747 $ 329,774 $ 87,172 $ 1,369,917 $ 4,768,610 Normal Cost % of Payroll 5.22% 6.86% 0.00% 3.32% 4.69% Amortization & Interest % of Payroll 80.25% 59.86% 0.00% 30.58% 63.10% Actuarially Determined Contribution % of Payroll 85.47% 66.72% 0.00% 33.89% 67.80% Other Post Employment Benefits - Retirement Health Insurance General Fund Water Fund Wastewater Fund Electric Fund City Total Funding Liability $ 48,844,865 $ 2,941,924 $ 1,054,355 $ 9,874,783 $ 62,715,927 Actuarial Value of Assets (42,297,766) (2,194,195) (1,025,164) (10,654,100) (56,171,225) Unfunded Liability $ 6,547,099 $ 747,729 $ 29,191 $ (779,317) $ 6,544,702 Funded % 86.60% 74.58% 97.23% 107.89% 89.56% Normal Cost $ 1,007,853 $ 38,373 $ 23,759 $ 48,375 $ 1,118,360 Amortization Payment 488,868 55,832 2,180 (58,191) 488,689 Interest at 6.5% 97,287 6,123 1,686 (638) 104,458 Actuarially Determined Contribution - Prel $ 1,594,008 $ 100,328 $ 27,625 $ (10,454) $ 1,711,507 Expected Benefit Payments - Retiree's 2,150,983 198,552 132,368 827,301 3,309,205 Actuarially Determined Contribution - Final $ 3,744,991 $ 298,880 $ 159,993 $ 816,847 $ 5,020,712 Estimated Applicable Payroll $ 15,567,462 $ 1,126,073 $ 612,426 $ 2,449,702 $ 19,755,662 Trust Funding as a % of Coverd Payroll 3.50% 2.00% 2.00% 3.20% 5.66% Net Trust Funding $ 544,861 $ 22,521 $ 12,249 $ 78,390 $ 658,022 Estimated Claim Payments - Retiree's 2,150,983 198,552 132,368 827,301 3,309,205 Total Estimated OPEB Funding $ 2,695,844 $ 221,074 $ 144,617 $ 905,692 $ 3,967,227 Police Pension City of Dover State of Pro-Rata City of Dover Delaware Share City Total Funding Liability $ 18,261,831 $ 461,752 Actuarial Value of Assets (14,490,367) (446,384) Unfunded Liability $ 3,771,464 $ 15,368 $ 1,308,109 Funded % 79% 97% Normal Cost - $ 1,447,600 $ 1,447,600 Amortization Payment $ 1,047,102 1,047,102 Interest at 6.5% 68,062.00 68,062 Actuarially Determined Contribution $ 1,115,164 $ 2,562,764 Estimated Applicable Payroll $ 9,030,400 Normal Cost % of Payroll 16.03% 90

Page 91

Item 18. ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Manager DATE SUBMITTED: March 8, 2022 PREPARED BY: David S. Hugg III SUBJECT: Code Revision: Assignment of City Planner REFERENCE: RELATED PROJECT: REVIEWED BY: EXHIBITS: Ordinance Number 2202-XXX EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: n/a AMOUNT BUDGETED: n/a FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): n/a TIMETABLE: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Amend Code as requested BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Current code provisions have the City Planner appointed by and reporting to City Council. Also, they do not clearly identify the City Planner as the Director of the Department of Planning, Inspections and Community Development. Other City Department Heads, except the Controller/Treasurer, the City Clerk, and the Police Chief report to and are under the direction of the City Manager. This change is intended to improve efficiency, strengthen the managerial team, and ensure effective coordination among all the operating departments. The change does not affect the City Planner’s authority and duties as related to the Planning Commission, the Board of Adjustment, or the Historic District Commission. This proposed organizational structure is typical for other jurisdictions. 91

Page 92

Item 18. City of Dover PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2022-03 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL 2 MET: 3 That Chapter 82 – Planning, Section 82-2 City Planner be amended by inserting the text indicated in bold, 4 blue, and deleting the text indicated in red strikeout as follows: 5 Sec. 82-1. - Planning commission. 6 7 There is hereby created a planning commission. The members of the planning commission shall be 8 appointed by the mayor, subject to confirmation by the council. The planning commission shall consist of 9 nine members serving three-year terms. Two members shall be selected from each council district and one 10 member shall serve from the city at-large. The terms of the members shall be arranged so that each year the 11 terms of three members shall expire, and the expiration date shall be on June 1. Incumbent members of the 12 planning commission shall continue to serve beyond the expiration of their term until a successor is 13 appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the council. 14 (Code 1968, § 2-68; Ord. of 10-12-1970; Code 1981, § 17-1; Ord. of 6-27-1994) 15 Charter reference— Power of council to create planning commission, subpart A, § 23. 16 State Law reference— Planning commission, 22 Del. C. §§ 701—711. 17 Sec. 82-2. City planner. 18 There is hereby established the office of city planner who shall be selected by the city manager city council 19 and employed at the pleasure of city manager mayor and council. The city planner shall be the Director 20 of Planning, Inspections and Community Development, and be directly responsible to the city 21 manager mayor and council. 22 (Code 1968, § 2-68; Ord. of 10-12-1970; Code 1981, § 17-2; Ord. of 1-9-2006; Ord. of 7-24-2006(1); Ord. 23 No. 2009-24, 11-9-2009; Ord. No. 2015-21, 12-14-2015, eff. 1-1-2016 ) 24 Sec. 82-3. - Planning services. 25 26 (a)Zoning verification letters/administrative interpretations. A zoning verification letter or administrative 27 interpretation will be provided by the city planner upon request to verify the current zoning of a particular 28 piece of property and the types of uses that are allowed in that zoning district. A request for a zoning 29 verification letter or administrative interpretation shall be submitted using forms provided by the planning 30 office. Fees related to zoning verification letters shall be as provided for in Appendix F—Fees and 31 Fines.(b)Content. A zoning verification letter or administrative interpretation may contain the following P.O. Box 475 Dover, Delaware 19903 92 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

Page 93

Item 18. Ordinance #2022-03 - Ch. 82 Planning, Sec. 82-2 City Planner Page 2 32 information based upon the request received:(1)The zoning district of the property and any zoning overlay 33 districts applicable to the property.(2)Verification that a particular use is permitted within the property's 34 zoning district.(3)A list of permitted uses in the zoning district.(4)Identification of any current Notice of 35 Violations issued for code enforcement violations on the subject property.(5)Any other requested 36 information determined by the city planner to be within the scope of this section.(c)Appeal of zoning 37 verification letter or administrative interpretation. Any determination made by the city planner may be 38 appealed to the board of adjustment in accordance with the provisions of Appendix B—Zoning, Article 39 9—Board of Adjustment, Section 2.2—Appeal of administrative order, requirement, decision or 40 determination. 41 ( Ord. No. 2015-21, 12-14-2015, eff. 1-1-2016 ) 42 Sec. 80-703. - Post-retirement benefits. 43 ADOPTED: * 44 S:\ORDINANCES\2022\DRAFT\ORDINANCE #2022-03 - PLANNING - CITY PLANNER\Ordinance #2022-03 - Ch 82 Planning Sec 82-2 - City Planner.wpd 45 SYNOPSIS 46 This ordinance transfers the position of City Planner under the direction of the City Manager and clarifies 47 that the City planner shall also be the Director of Planning, Inspections and Community Development. 48 Current code provisions have the City Planner appointed by and reporting to City Council. Also, they do 49 not clearly identify the City Planner as the Director of the Department of Planning, Inspections and 50 Community Development. Other City Department Heads, except the Controller/Treasurer, the City Clerk, 51 and the Police Chief report to and are under the direction of the City Manager. 52 This change is intended to improve efficiency, strengthen the managerial team, and ensure effective 53 coordination among all the operating departments. The change does not affect the City Planner's authority 54 and duties as related to the Planning Commission, the Board of Adjustment, or the Historic District 55 Commission. 56 This proposed organizational structure is typical for other jurisdictions. 57 (SPONSORS: ANDERSON AND HUGG) 58 Actions History 59 04/12/2022 - Scheduled for Introduction - Council Committee of the Whole/Legislative, Finance, and Administration 60 Committee P.O. Box 475 Dover, Delaware 19903 93 Community Excellence Through Quality Service

Page 94

Item 19. WHAT: Request to State Joint Committee on Capital Improvements (a.k.a. Bond Bill Committee - FY 2023) 94

Page 95

Item 19. • Request $33,393,410 • $32,893,410 - Water and Wastewater infrastructure: Full Request: • Water Quality $12,633,960 • Wastewater $7,563,840 • Street and Stormwater $12,695,610 • $500,000 – River Walk (Phase I) 95

Page 96

Item 19. • Replace 7.2 miles of old (~60 years) water main Water • Upgrade capacity to 8” Quality • Reduce discolored water • Improve fire protection Projects • Minimize flushing losses and costs/lost reveues 96

Page 97

Item 19. • Replace 6 miles of deteriorated sewer main Wastewater • Minimize groundwater intrusion • Reduce impact on Kent Co. treatment allocation Inflow and • Reduce treatment costs to City (~$1.4 M) Infiltration • Decrease customer utility billing (groundwater Projects adjustment fee) • Allow use of funds for other needs 97

Page 98

Item 19. • Stormwater pipes are old and failing • Reduce local flooding Stormwater • Avoid sink holes and property damage Projects • Ensure ADA compliant sidewalks • Improve streets 98

Page 99

Item 19. Water, Wastewater, Stormwater Projects – Where? Economic Low Income Areas Development Opportunities • Capital Green • S. Little Creek – • Manchester square Starlifter Loop • Willis Road (Aeropark) 99

Page 100

Item 19. • Very Old and Failing Infrastructure (portions): Water, • West Street west alley Wastewater, • Fairview Ave east and west alleys • N. Bradford Street Stormwater • Queen Street Projects – • New Street • Kings Highway Where? • Reed Street • Bank Lane • Lakewood Place alley • Gov’s Blvd-N. Bradford west alley 100

Page 101

Item 19. • Phase I - design and engineering • Coordination with Meetinghouse Branch Drainage Project • Integration with PWII Voluntary Cleanup Program • Development of River Walk Plan River Walk 101

Page 102

Item 19. • Request submitted electronically and in writing (done) • Answer questions and supply any requested information Next Steps • Work with Dover legislative delegation to garner support • Simultaneously seek alternative funding (Infrastructure Act) 102

Page 103

Item 19. Fiscal Year 2023 City of Dover Utility Bond Bill Projects Separated by Low-Income Neighborhoods, Economic Development, and Old and Failing Infrastructure And Riverwalk Design Attachment B Project Description Water Costs Wastewater Costs Street Costs Stormwater Engineering / Inspections Costs TOTAL COSTS Comments Engineering & Inspections Low-Income Neighborhoods 10% of total nproject costs Manchester Square $ 756,000 $ 576,000 $ 266,400 $ 144,000 $ 174,240 $ 1,916,640 Wastewater Costs $192 / lf 192.00 Capital Green $ 2,910,000 $ 2,640,000 $ 1,742,400 $ 864,000 $ 815,640 $ 8,972,040 Street Costs (38' Width) / lf $270 Willis Road $ 408,000 $ 696,000 $ 516,000 $ 300,000 $ 192,000 $ 2,112,000 Alley Costs (12' Width no Conc.)/lf $35 $ 4,074,000 $ 3,912,000 $ 2,524,800 $ 1,308,000 $ 1,181,880 Total Investment for Low-Income Areas $ 13,000,680 Economic Development Opportunity Areas S Little Creek Loop - Starlilfter $ 2,411,160 $ - $ - $ - $ 241,116 $ 2,652,276 Enhance the viability of the Aeropark Total Investment for Economic Development Opportunity Areas $ 2,652,276 Old and Failing Infrastructure West Street West Alley $ 459,000 $ 362,880 $ 67,200 $ 3,600 $ 89,268 $ 981,948 William to Walker Stormwater Costs /lf $200 Fairview Avenue East Alley $ 459,000 $ 288,000 $ 67,200 $ - $ 81,420 $ 895,620 William to Walker Fairview Avenue West Alley $ 459,000 $ 362,880 $ 67,200 $ 3,600 $ 89,268 $ 981,948 William to Walker N. Bradford Street $ 163,200 $ 103,680 $ 137,700 $ - $ 40,458 $ 445,038 Walker to Ross Queen Street $ 1,103,160 $ 622,080 $ 874,800 $ 384,000 $ 298,404 $ 3,282,444 Mary to Loockerman New Street $ 1,297,440 $ 760,320 $ 1,296,000 $ 144,000 $ 349,776 $ 3,847,536 William to Loockerman Kings Highway $ 552,000 $ 145,152 $ 518,400 $ 60,000 $ 127,555 $ 1,403,107 Division to Loockerman Reed Street $ 240,000 $ 209,664 $ 398,400 $ 456,000 $ 130,406 $ 1,434,470 West Street to State Street Queen Street $ 240,000 $ 230,400 $ 324,000 $ 96,000 $ 89,040 $ 979,440 North Street to Water Street Bank Lane $ 480,000 $ 198,144 $ 631,800 $ 216,000 $ 152,594 $ 1,678,538 West Street to The Green Lakewood Place Alley East $ 360,000 $ 207,360 $ 42,000 $ 72,000 $ 68,136 $ 749,496 N. of William to Walker Governors Blvd / N Bradford Alley West $ 336,000 $ 161,280 $ 12,600 $ - $ 50,988 $ 560,868 N. Governors to William Total Investment for Aging $ 6,148,800 $ 3,651,840 $ 4,437,300 $ 1,435,200 $ 1,567,314 $ 17,240,454 Failing Infrastructure Subtotal of Infrastructure Request: $ 32,893,410.00 Riverwalk Design and Engineering: $500,000 Total City of Dover request to Joint Finance Committee $ 33,393,410.00 103

Page 104

Item 20. CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole (Leg & Fin) DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Manager’s Office SUBMITTED ON: April 1, 2022 PREPARED BY: Sharon J. Duca, P.E., Assistant City Manager REVIEWED BY: David S. Hugg, III, City Manager and Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer SUBJECT: Report on Segal Study TIMETABLE: Complete pilot test within thirty (30) days of Council approval. RELATED PROJECT: n/a EXHIBITS Exhibit A: Report on Segal Study Presentation REFERENCE: n/a EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: To be determined. AMOUNT BUDGETED: $0.00 at this time. FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): To be determined. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the City Manager’s Office to complete the pilot test to further assess the Segal Evaluator, JDQs and Job Descriptions. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: In FY 2020, a Request for Proposal was issued to hire a firm to complete a classification, compensation, benefits system and pay for performance evaluation system. Staff recommended that City Council award the project to Segal Waters Consulting (Segal) which City Council approved at their regular meeting on March 9, 2020, at a value of approximately $93,000. Segal’s Classification & Total Compensation Study Report of Findings & Recommendations (Segal Study) was presented to the Council Committee of the Whole on January 26, 2021. Ultimately it was referred back to staff at the Council Committee of the Whole meeting of February 23, 2021, due to various concerns of staff and Council. An update on the City Manager’s evaluation of the Segal Study was presented to the Council Committee of the Whole on December 14, 2021. At the time various questions were submitted to Segal and responses were received in January 2022. The Segal Study was to include all non-bargaining employees (currently forty-nine (49) positions) as well as a few positions represented by the labor group AFSCME (currently seven (7) positions) that were identified due to some difficulties hiring and retaining employees in those positions. It should be noted 104

Page 105

Item 20. that not all positions were included in all components of the study. In addition, a few positions have been created by the City since the study started while the study created a few positions as well. Based upon the City Manager’s Office review of available materials it has been confirmed that the following tasks were included in the Segal Study: creation of market competitiveness analysis, development of job description questionnaires, development of new job descriptions, creation of Segal Evaluator assessment of positions, creation of and assignment to new salary ranges, determination of salary adjustments for employees, review of employee exemption status, review of benefits and creation of performance evaluations. The Compensation Market Competitiveness Report reviewed thirty-five (35) positions (five (5) of which were AFSCME positions). Ten (10) government entities participated in the study to varying degrees which were also compared to three (3) published surveys. The number of ‘matches’ per position reviewed ranged from two (2) to twelve (12). Of those ‘matches’ not all were truly comparable to the City’s positions. Unfortunately, all ‘matches’ were used to develop an average market salary range for each compared position. Due to the number of inconsistencies, it is recommended that this portion of the Segal Study not be accepted for anything other than reference. Job Description Questionnaires (JDQs) were distributed that contained specific questions regarding a position’s responsibilities and span of influence. The JDQs were completed by each employee and reviewed by the employee’s supervisor/department head. The JDQ is a key document to the development of new job descriptions, grading the position and assigning a salary range. The City Manager’s Office will be reviewing these documents. In addition, all recently created City positions not previously included in the Segal Study will need a JDQ developed. Job Descriptions were developed for fifty-eight (58) positions of which forty-four (44) were non- bargaining, seven (7) were AFSCME, two (2) were part-time and five (5) were new positions. All department heads were given the opportunity to review the job descriptions twice; once in 2021 and once in 2022. The City Manager’s Office will review the job descriptions in conjunction the JDQ review. In addition, all recently created City positions not previously included in the Segal Study will need a job description developed. The Segal Evaluator is a proprietary evaluation tool that is used to develop grade assignments for all positions. Upon review of the Segal Evaluator scores and proposed pay grades it was found that twenty- seven (27) positions had scores that did not coincide with their proposed pay grade. It is understood that decisions were made to maintain internal equity however due to the volume of altered positions the City Manager’s Office would prefer to perform an additional review of this process. This would be done by conducting a pilot test with two (2) departments by closely assessing the JDQ responses, the job descriptions and the Segal Evaluator scoring. Compensation Salary Ranges were developed utilizing pay grades one (1) through seventeen (17). The City Manager’s Office has no objection to the proposed pay grades. The City Manager’s Office does not agree that any position should be downgraded in the current market or that staff salaries should be frozen at maximum. Instead, compensation should be evaluated every three (3) to four (4) years as recommended in the Segal Study. Salary Adjustments for Employees were previously established in two (2) phases. The first was to bring all effected staff up to the minimum pay grade and the second was to place effected staff appropriately within their pay grade. At this time all staff included in the study were brought up to minimum in FY 2022 except for two (2) non-bargaining staff members and one (1) AFSCME staff member. It is proposed that these three (3) staff members be addressed in the FY 2023 budget. In terms of placing staff appropriately within their pay grade the provided formula only calculates pay based upon years of service in a particular position. There is no consideration made for longevity with the City. This is a concern of 105

Page 106

Item 20. the City Manager’s Office and additional research must be performed to find a more appropriate means of calculation. Segal performed an Exemption Status Analysis based upon the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for all but two (2) positions. It will be necessary for the Human Resources Department to compare this information to existing designations. Any discrepancies would be addressed at that time. A Benefits Analysis was also performed as part of the Segal Study. Most of the City’s benefits were found to be competitive when compared to the ten (10) public entities. At this time the City Manager’s Office recommends that effort be put forth to fairly evaluate compensation and then improvements to benefits packages can be reviewed by the Human Resources Department. A new Performance Evaluation was developed as part of the Segal Study and training was provided to staff in October 2021. Utilization of the evaluation has not officially started. A pay-for-performance program was also not developed as part of the study. This area will require further review following the efforts to improve compensation. In summary, the next steps include the completion of the pilot test referenced above to further assess the Segal Evaluator, JDQs and Job Descriptions. It is intended that once this is complete, the appropriateness of positions and associated pay grades can be determined. 106

Page 107

Item 20. 04.12.22 REPORT ON SEGAL STUDY COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE 107

Page 108

Item 20. Background • Council approved awarding the • Study to include all non-bargaining Classification, Compensation, Benefits positions (currently 49) and a few System and Performance Evaluation System AFSCME positions (currently 7). RFP to Segal on 03.09.20. • Not all positions included in all • First presentation to the Council Committee components of the Study. of the Whole on 01.26.21. • Referred back to staff on 02.23.21. • City Manager’s Office (CMO) provided update to Council Committee of the Whole on 12.14.21. 108 2

Page 109

Item 20. Compensation Market Competitiveness Report 109 3

Page 110

Job Description Questionnaires, Job Descriptions Item 20. and Segal Evaluator Job Description Questionnaires Job Descriptions Segal Evaluator (JDQs) • Completed by each • Developed for 58 positions • Proprietary evaluation tool employee and reviewed by (44 non-bargaining, 7 to develop pay grade supervisor/department AFSCME, 2 part-time, 5 new assignments for positions. head. positions). • 27 positions had scores • Key document to develop • Department Heads reviewed which did not coincide with Job Descriptions and grade twice (2021 and 2022). proposed pay grade (internal the position. equity). • NEXT STEPS: CMO to review • NEXT STEPS: CMO to review all Job Descriptions and • NEXT STEPS: CMO to all JDQs and develop JDQs develop Job Descriptions for conduct pilot test with 2 for new positions following new positions following pilot departments to review JDQs, pilot test. test. Job Descriptions and Evaluator Scores. 110 4

Page 111

Compensation Salary Ranges, Salary Adjustments, Item 20. Exemption Status Analysis Compensation Salary Salary Adjustments for Exemption Status Ranges Employees Analysis • Pay Grades 1 – 17 • Staff brought up to • Based upon Fair Labor minimum pay grade in Standards Act; • City Manager’s Office FY 2022 except for 3 complete for all but 2 has no objections. employees (FY 2023). employees. • NEXT STEPS: Ensure • NEXT STEPS: Research • NEXT STEPS: HR to no one downgraded or appropriate calculations finalize verification. frozen. Re-evaluate to place employees in every 3 – 4 years. pay grades. 111 5

Page 112

Benefits Analysis and Performance Evaluation Item 20. Benefits Analysis Performance Evaluation • Most of City’s benefits • Evaluation form developed. competitive compared to 10 public entities. • Training provided however utilization not officially • NEXT STEPS: Complete effort started. to fairly evaluate compensation then HR review • Pay-for-performance not benefits improvements. developed. • NEXT STEPS: Complete effort to fairly evaluate compensation then conduct further review. 112 6

Page 113

1. Utilize Compensation Market Competitiveness Item 20. Report for reference only. 2. CMO to conduct pilot test to review/evaluate JDQs, Job Descriptions and Evaluator Scores. 3. CMO to review all JDQs and develop JDQs for new positions. 4. CMO to review all Job Descriptions and develop Job Descriptions for new positions. 5. CMO to complete re-evaluation of all Evaluator Scores. Adjust staff placement in Compensation Salary Ranges as required. NEXT STEPS Ensure no one downgraded or frozen. 6. CMO to budget for 3 employees to be brought PRIORITIZED up to minimum in FY 2023. 7. HR to research appropriate calculations to place employees within pay grades. 8. HR to finalize Exemption Status verification. 9. CMO/HR to review benefits improvements. 10. CMO/HR to review Pay-for-Performance/ Performance Evaluation implementation. 113 11. Re-evaluate every 3 – 4 years. 7

Page 114

Item 21. CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE ACTION FORM PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole (Leg & Fin) DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Manager’s Office SUBMITTED ON: April 1, 2022 PREPARED BY: Sharon J. Duca, P.E., Assistant City Manager REVIEWED BY: David S. Hugg, III, City Manager and Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer SUBJECT: Report on River Walk Progress TIMETABLE: To be determined based upon funding opportunities. RELATED PROJECT: Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project EXHIBITS Exhibit A – PWII Voluntary Cleanup Program & Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project REFERENCE: n/a EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: To be determined. AMOUNT BUDGETED: $0.00 at this time. FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): To be determined. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the following: 1) that the proposed use of the old Public Works Yard (PWII) off of E. Water Street be a potential River Walk Park area; 2) that City funds or other funding sources be used toward the proposed project and 3) that staff work on obtaining funds for the project and work on the project itself. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Pre-1940 the old Public Works Yard (PWII) off of E. Water Street was a natural branch of the St. Jones River – Meeting House Branch. Post-1940 PWII was operated as a dump for municipal solid waste, contracting waste, road and tree debris, glass, metal, and inert solid waste. The site also functioned as a wastewater treatment facility, prior to connecting to the Kent County sanitary sewer system, as well as an incinerator. Due to contaminants realized from these uses, PWII is currently part of the Delaware Natural Resources and Environmental Control’s (DNREC’s) Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). The site is no longer utilized as a Public Works yard and is currently vacant except for utility purposes. The first project proposed for the site is the Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project. It will improve the capacity of the stormwater system from Governors Avenue to the St. Jones River. This project addresses the flooding occurring to Bayhealth Hospital and various portions of downtown Dover by adequately conveying the ten-year storm through the expanded system. Across the PWII portion of 114

Page 115

Item 21. the project, an open channel design will restore the Meeting House Branch of the St. Jones River. Meeting House Branch was previously enclosed to accommodate the development of PWII and downtown Dover. Re-establishing the open channel would therefore replace the currently enclosed stormwater pipe and restore the previous waterway. The City of Dover has received funding from the State of Delaware FY2022 Bond Bill in the amount of $8,300,000 for this significant drainage improvement project. Prior to constructing the Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project, the PWII site must be remediated to accommodate the end use of the site in conjunction with the VCP. In order to ensure the site is properly remediated, the end use is proposed to be a River Walk Park. As such the site would be remediated to recreational use standards. (It should be noted that the remediation work may not address all aspects of the River Walk Park design as it is projected that the design detail will not be complete prior to the finalization of the VCP.) This project will focus on the natural beauty of the St. Jones River. Park features could include a pollinator garden, nature-scape playground, natural meadow area, a nature center and other public amenities including a pathway, benches and a bridge to connect the River Walk to the Capital Green neighborhood. It is required that the City pay for the site remediation with City funds. As such staff is looking for grants and other avenues of funding to fund the design and engineering of the River Walk Park project. A feasibility study including survey will need to be performed of the City’s subject properties in order to determine limitations to the site such as wetlands and utilities. It is currently projected that the Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project will be complete by the end of FY2024. Design and engineering for the River Walk Park could be performed simultaneously. It is anticipated that the environmental services of the Department of Public Works, the engineering services of the Department of Water & Wastewater as well as the Parks & Recreation Department would be involved to various degrees on this project. Before staff proceeds further on the project, it is requested that City Council authorize the following: 1) that the proposed use of PWII be a potential River Walk Park area; 2) that City funds or other funding sources be used toward the proposed project and 3) that staff work on obtaining funds for the project and work on the project itself. 115

Page 116

PWII Voluntary Cleanup Program Item 21. Maxar, Microsoft & b e Reha Wildlif er Cent for arden Fairy G Kids te Ga Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Gate Bridge EXHIBIT A ch River O un verlook k La ya Ka Project den tor Gar Pier Pollina ea Ar 116 ure Nat er t / Cen arket an M Artis Vendors / Food Trees s w/ Table es den t Bench l Artis ive Woo Loca p / Scape g Sho s ge Nature- nd Dinin room Brid Playgr ou Decorat Bath Garde ns and Nature s (DE Benche ciety) So omic Econ ment g rtain Parkin Ente rea Lot A Golf Cart 550 US Feet Deed Restriction (Fenced Area) County Pump Station Contaminated Property Contaminated Soil Proposed Open Channel Parcels Walking Path 275 137.5 0 ´

Back to this meeting